March 2010

Geely Buys Volvo From Ford for $1.8 Billion in Biggest Chinese Auto Deal

March 28, 2010

By Ola Kinnander and Keith Naughton March 29 (Bloomberg) — Zhejiang Geely Holding Co. agreed to buy Volvo Cars from Ford Motor Co. for $1.8 billion in the biggest overseas acquisition by a Chinese automaker, more than 18 months after the two companies first entered discussions. The price includes a $200 million note and the remainder to be paid in cash, Ford Chief Financial Officer Lewis Booth said yesterday in Gothenburg, Sweden. Time spent on seeking regulatory approval in different jurisdictions means the companies now aim to complete the deal in the third quarter, Geely Chairman Li Shufu said. Booming auto sales in China made the nation the largest car market last year, generating profit that’s allowing its manufacturers to reach out to Western markets and technologies. After the 2007 sale of Aston Martin, and of Jaguar and Land Rover to Tata Motors Ltd. for $2.4 billion the following year, divesting Volvo completes Ford Chief Executive Officer Alan Mulally ’s strategy of exiting European luxury lines to focus on its namesake brand. “If I were a competitor to Geely in China and all of a sudden I would lose ground to my competitor because they acquired Volvo, I would look to do the same,” Mike Tyndall , an automotive specialist with Nomura Securities in London, said in a telephone interview. “The experience of both Tata and Geely will be the real test.” Geely Automobile Holdings Ltd., the automaker’s listed unit, rose 4.7 percent as of 10:19 a.m in Hong Kong trading. Ford Supplies Yesterday’s agreement includes terms regarding intellectual property rights and supply as well as research and development, the Chinese company said. Geely will help Volvo, whose headquarters will stay in Gothenburg, tap China’s growing market, Li said at a joint press conference with Ford. Tata, India’s biggest truckmaker, reported its first profit in the quarter ended in December after paying off the remaining debt from the Jaguar and Land Rover acquisition in October by raising $750 million. Tata plans to have seven Jaguar and Land Rover dealerships in India this fiscal year, including ones currently operating in Mumbai and New Delhi. As part of its efforts to increase the Indian company’s sales abroad, Tata last month hired Carl-Peter Forster , a former General Motors Co. and Bayerische Motoren Werke AG executive, as chief executive, based in the company’s Mumbai headquarters. Forster will be responsible for reviving the slumping luxury brands that Tata bought from Ford while increasing sales of the $2500 Nano, the cheapest car in the world. Tata’s stock has risen 13.8 percent since the Jaguar and Land Rover deal was announced in March 2008. ‘Tiger’ “I see Volvo as a tiger: it belongs to the forest and shouldn’t be contained in the zoo,” Li said in Mandarin. “The heart of the tiger is in Sweden and Belgium,” he said, referring to the two countries where Volvo has its main plants. “Its paws should extend all across the world.” Volvo plans to produce 390,000 cars this year, compared with 330,000 in 2009, CEO Stephen Odell said. Geely will restore profitability to Volvo, according to Ford ’s Booth. Ford will continue to supply Volvo powertrains, stampings and some vehicle components. It also agreed to provide engineering and technology support, and access to tooling for common components for an unspecified period. The Swedish carmaker’s S40 model is built on the mechanical foundation of the Ford Focus now sold in Europe. Volvo supplies diesel engines for Ford’s European lineup. ‘Image Boost’ “We have continued to invest in Volvo, just as we did at Jaguar Land Rover, to make sure that our employees and now our ex-employees at Jaguar Land Rover are going to be working in a place that has good potential for the future,” Booth said in a March 24 interview. Jaguar Land Rover reported its first quarterly profit since being bought by India’s Tata Motors Ltd. in 2008 in February after shedding staff and boosting sales of luxury cars. Geely first approached Dearborn, Michigan-based Ford about buying Volvo in mid-2008, two people familiar with the talks have said. Ford named Geely its “preferred bidder” in October 2009 and said on Dec. 23 that they had agreed on the major terms of the transaction. The cash portion of the purchase price will be adjusted for Volvo’s pension deficits, debt, cash and working capital, which could mean a “significant decrease” in proceeds to Ford, the U.S. carmaker said. Volvo Loan The European Investment Bank approved a 200 million-euro loan to Volvo last year, pending a Swedish state guarantee for the credit. Sweden later put on hold that process, citing Volvo’s uncertain ownership. Industry Minister Maud Olofsson said in an interview yesterday that the government is willing to revisit the loan. Geely hasn’t decided whether it will apply for the credit, Li said. Li, Geely’s founder, has said he is seeking to have half the company’s sales from overseas markets by 2015. He aims to sell 200,000 Volvos a year in China, up from 22,405 last year, and has been seeking locations for a new plant there. Sales-tax cuts for smaller vehicles combined with rural subsidies boosted nationwide auto sales in China 46 percent last year to 13.6 million, helping it supplant the U.S. as the world’s largest auto market. Sales Slump Volvo sold 334,808 cars worldwide last year, a decline of 11 percent from 2008 and 27 percent from a peak of about 460,000 in 2007, according to the company. Its sales in the U.S. have risen for nine consecutive months and increased 40 percent this year through February. The Swedish carmaker has about 20,000 employees worldwide, including almost 14,000 in Sweden. It has about 2,500 dealers in 100 countries. The unit’s pretax loss narrowed to $934 million last year from $1.7 billion in 2008, Ford said on Jan. 28. Volvo’s last annual pretax profit was $377 million in 2005. Volvo was founded 1926 as a subsidiary SKF AB , today the world’s largest bearings maker. Volvo, which means “I roll” in Latin, was the name of one of SKF’s ball bearings series. Saab, Hummer Saab Automobile, the Swedish auto brand that was under General Motors Co.’s control for the past two decades, was sold last month to Dutch luxury-automaker Spyker Cars NV for about $400 million. GM last month failed to complete a sale of its Hummer line of sport-utility vehicles to Sichuan Tengzhong Heavy Industrial Machinery Co. after failing to win Chinese government approval, the Detroit-based automaker said. GM has said it will consider other bidders for Hummer, and may retire the brand. Shanghai-based SAIC Motor Corp., China’s biggest automaker, paid $116 million for the design rights of MG Rover Group Ltd.’s Rover 25 and 75 cars in 2005. In December, Beijing Automotive Industry Holding Co. acquired some technology from Saab for $200 million to develop its own vehicles. Ford ended three years of losses with net income of $2.7 billion in 2009 and was the only major U.S. automaker to avoid bankruptcy. Ford paid $6.5 billion for Volvo in 1999. “Compared to the business environment when we bought it, it’s a very different world,” Booth said March 24. “We only have so much management resource, we only have so much capital to invest and we needed to make sure we were focusing on the Ford business.” Citigroup Inc. and JPMorgan Chase & Co. are advising Ford on the deal. N.M. Rothschild & Sons Ltd. is advising Geely. To contact the reporters on this story: Ola Kinnander in Gothenburg, Sweden, via okinnander@bloomberg.net Keith Naughton in Dearborn, Michigan, at Knaughton3@bloomberg.net

Read the full article →

Papandreou Faces $21 Billion Greek Bond Burden After Securing EU’s Support

March 28, 2010

By John Fraher and Simon Kennedy March 29 (Bloomberg) — Greek Prime Minister George Papandreou , fresh from winning a European Union aid package last week, now has to prove he can keep his nation’s finances afloat. His government still has to raise as much as 15.5 billion euros ($21 billion) by the end of May, almost as much debt as it sold in the first quarter, says Petros Christodoulou , head of the country’s debt agency. Failure to do so could spark a new round of the fiscal crisis and trigger the use of the aid plan crafted by EU leaders in Brussels on March 25. The EU and International Monetary Fund pledge to help Greece finance the region’s biggest budget deficit should it run out of options in capital markets helped lift the euro from a 10-month low against the dollar and drove stocks higher around the world. Papandreou must now decide whether to wait and see if Greek bond yields decline further or try to raise cash right away to replenish the government’s coffers. “Greece still needs to raise a big amount money, and there is no guarantee that they can do it cheaply,” said Robin Marshall , director of fixed income in London at Smith & Williamson Investment Management, which oversees about $20 billion. “There’s still a lot of uncertainty, and we don’t know whether this mechanism that is being put in place works until it’s tested.” Papandreou told reporters March 26 that Greece will “find the opportune time to go out on the market.” The aid mechanism removes the risk of Greece failing to repay bond investors and “should tighten the spreads materially,” Christodoulou said in an e-mailed response to questions the same day. He declined to comment after the Financial Times quoted him March 27 saying the country would “like to return to the market within March.” Unsustainably High Papandreou demanded financial aid from the EU to help Greece reduce its borrowing costs , which he says are unsustainably high. Even after the bailout pledge, the yield on Greek 10-year bonds ended last week at 6.19 percent, still 3.04 percentage points above the rate on comparable German securities, the European benchmark. The gap was 2.39 percentage points at the start of this year and as high as 3.96 percentage points in January. Euro-area countries would grant more than half the loans and the IMF would provide the rest in the deal struck last week. Papandreou says he never expects to seek assistance. Its “counterproductive” to speculate about the scenarios, including developments on spreads, that would spur an aid request under the new facility, he said. Cost for EU Goldman Sachs Group Inc. Chief European Economist Erik Nielsen estimates Greece will ultimately need an 18-month package of as much as 25 billion euros with the IMF providing about 10 billion euros of that. French Finance Minister Christine Lagarde said March 27 in Cernobbio, Italy, that the EU’s strategy shows the “determination” of policy makers to “keep the euro stable.” Her German counterpart, Wolfgang Schaeuble, said in a Welt Online interview the same day that EU countries seeking IMF help must remain an exception and in the longer term “Europe must be able to solve” fiscal problems by itself. Greece faces about 12 billion euros of debt repayments in April, with 8.2 billion euros of five-year bonds and about 3.9 billion euros of bills maturing that month. It must repay 8.5 billion euros of 10-year bonds in May. While those are the only bond maturities Greece faces this year, the country needs an average of almost 2 billion euros a month to cover the budget deficit and interest payments on existing debt, its deficit reduction plan shows. The government aims to cut its shortfall by four percentage points in 2010 from last year’s 12.7 percent of gross domestic product, before satisfying the EU’s 3 percent limit by 2012. “The announcement of the bailout mechanism for Greece should end the immediate liquidity and therefore default risk for Greece,” Laurence Mutkin , head of European fixed-income strategy in London at Morgan Stanley, wrote in a report to clients. “However, we think that the longer term trajectory for Greece remains uncertain.” To contact the reporters on this story: John Fraher in London at jfraher@bloomberg.net Simon Kennedy in Paris at skennedy4@bloomberg.net

Read the full article →

Euro Strengthens as Greece Concerns Recede; Copper, Mining Stocks Advance

March 28, 2010

By Darren Boey March 29 (Bloomberg) — The euro strengthened against the dollar for a second day on receding concern Greece’s financial crisis will derail the 16-nation region’s economic recovery. Gains in copper drove stocks of Asian mining companies higher. The euro strengthened to $1.344 at 12:24 p.m. in Tokyo from $1.3410 in New York on March 26. Copper for delivery in three months in London gained 1.6 percent to $7,635 a metric ton as inventories slid. Nickel rose 3 percent to $24,300 a ton. A gauge of material producers on the MSCI Asia Pacific Index rose 0.3 percent. Standard & Poor’s 500 futures advanced 0.2 percent. The euro advanced before a report today forecast to show European economic confidence rose to the highest since June 2008 and builds on gains last week after the European Union and International Monetary Fund pledged to help Greece finance its budget deficit. The MSCI World Index has risen 2.2 percent this quarter, erasing declines of as much as 6.5 percent, as confidence in the global recovery grew. “People are becoming more bullish on riskier assets. Sovereign risk in Greece and Euroland will abate this year,” said Hideo Shimomura , who helps oversee $54.1 billion in Tokyo as chief fund investor at Mitsubishi UFJ Asset Management Co. Europe’s currency rose to 124.41 yen from 124.06 yen. The dollar traded at 92.65 yen from 92.52 yen. It touched 92.96 yen on March 25, the highest since Jan. 8. The euro has declined 6.2 percent against the dollar in the quarter ending March 31, the most since the three months ended Sept. 30, 2008. European Confidence An index of executive and consumer sentiment in the 16 nations using the euro rose to 97.1 this month from 95.9 in February, according to the median estimate of economists in a Bloomberg News survey. The European Commission in Brussels is scheduled to release the data today. ‘‘The euro has been benefiting from an agreement on Friday among European leaders that a rescue package for Greece is required,’’ said Mike Jones , a currency strategist at Bank of New Zealand Ltd. in Wellington. Australia’s currency strengthened 0.3 percent to 90.71 U.S. cents, and 0.5 percent to 84.05 yen. Australian retail sales rose 0.3 percent in February, after gaining 1.2 percent the previous month, according to the median forecast of 19 economists in a Bloomberg News survey. Interest rates may need to be increased further to contain inflation, Reserve Bank of Australia Governor Glenn Stevens said in an interview with Australia’s Channel Seven broadcast today. The bank has raised rates at four of its past five meetings. Retail Data ‘‘Retail trade is really the indicator of the degree to which interest-rate hikes are starting to affect the consumer,” said Amy Auster , head of foreign-exchange and international economics research at Australia & New Zealand Banking Group Ltd. in Melbourne. “If the retail-trade data on Wednesday cause the market to re-price the RBA’s April move, that would obviously be supportive for the Aussie.” Copper futures gained as stockpiles monitored by the London Metal Exchange dropped on March 26 to the lowest level since Jan. 11. Aluminum advanced 1.1 percent. Oil futures rose as much 0.7 percent to $81.25 a barrel in after-hours electronic trading on the New York Mercantile Exchange. BHP Billiton Ltd., the world’s largest mining company, gained 0.5 percent to A$43.51 in Sydney. Jiangxi Copper Co. climbed 1.7 percent to HK$16.84 in Hong Kong. China Petroleum & Chemical Corp., Asia’s biggest oil refiner that’s also known as Sinopec, gained 2.5 percent in Shanghai trading after 2009 earnings doubled. China Construction Bank Corp. , the country’s second-largest bank, advanced 2.2 percent in Shanghai after it said fourth-quarter profit more than doubled. China’s Shanghai Composite Index rose 1.8 percent to the highest in more than two months. Hong Kong’s Hang Seng Index increased 0.7 percent. Japanese Stocks Japan’s Nikkei 225 Stock Average lost 0.5 percent, led by companies trading without the rights to their latest dividends. Tokyo Gas Co., a gas utility, and Eisai Co., a drugmaker, dropped more than 1.6 percent. “Japanese shares are falling temporarily because they are ex-rights, although the market has been on an upward trend supported by strong demand from Asia,” said Akio Yoshino , chief economist at Societe Generale Asset Management (Japan) Inc., which manages the equivalent of $17 billion. Seven stocks advanced for every six that declined on the MSCI Asia Pacific Index , which gained 0.1 percent to 124.60. To contact the reporter for this story: Darren Boey at in Hong Kong or dboey@bloomberg.net ; Jonathan Burgos in Singapore at jburgos4@bloomberg.net .

Read the full article →

CoStar’s Retail News Roundup: Mar. 28 – Apr. 3, 2010

March 28, 2010

This week in the Retail Roundup, CoStar reports on expansions or new concepts at Best Buy and Yankee Candle; closings, cutbacks, bankruptcy, default, receivership or foreclosure news at Saks; acquisition, merger, loan, sale, or IPO activity at Glimcher…

Read the full article →

Why Two-Meter Billionaire Prokhorov Says He’s Only NBA Owner Who Can Dunk

March 28, 2010
Read the full article →

Deutsche Bank to Add Prime Brokerage Staff Targeting New Asia Hedge Funds

March 28, 2010

By Tomoko Yamazaki and Komaki Ito March 29 (Bloomberg) — Deutsche Bank AG ’s prime brokerage will hire more staff in Asia as it aims to lure business from hedge-fund startups in the region leading the global economic recovery, said Sean Capstick , head of capital introduction. Frankfurt-based Deutsche Bank has boosted its pan-Asian prime finance staff by about 20 percent over the last 18 months, said Capstick, declining to give details. The increasing number of startup funds in Asia will be key for growth at the division, which provides services to hedge funds, he said. “Within the global prime finance world, Asia is a big focus,” London-based Capstick said in an interview in Tokyo on March 25. “We’ve been very involved in the startup markets and that is something we absolutely plan to continue doing.” The industry may attract $222 billion of capital this year, according to a Deutsche Bank survey of investors this month, marking the first annual net inflow since the global financial crisis hit in 2007. Citigroup Inc. plans to double the size of a team helping pension and government-backed funds manage direct hedge fund investments. In the past 18 months in the Asia-Pacific, Deutsche Bank hired Merrill Lynch & Co.’s Masa Yanagisawa as a director for the hedge fund capital group in Tokyo. Harvey Twomey , Hong Kong- based head of prime finance institutional client group, also joined from Merrill Lynch, said Capstick. Taking Market Share Deutsche Bank has captured an increasing number of clients in the wake of the collapse of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. in September 2008 and Bear Stearns Cos.’s hedge funds in 2007 as investors sought businesses with European banks that had more stable balance sheets , Capstick said. The bank increased its market share among prime brokers to 8.2 percent at the end of 2009, ranking fifth, from 5.9 percent the end of 2007, according to Eurekahedge Pte . Top-ranked Goldman Sachs Group Inc. dropped to 17.7 percent from 18.5 percent, while second-place Morgan Stanley dropped to 16.3 percent from 20 percent. Analysts and managers left major financial institutions or global hedge funds and started their own firms last year to capitalize on investment opportunities in the wake of the worst market rout since the Great Depression. There were 102 hedge- fund startups in Asia in 2009, compared with 193 in Europe and 257 in the U.S., according to Eurekahedge, a Singapore-based data provider. Outperforming Investors are coming to Asia as the region’s economic growth helps boost performances among managers. The Eurekahedge Asian Hedge Fund Index returned 26 percent in 2009, beating the 20 percent gain by the global index. Emerging Asia is expected to grow at more than twice the pace of the global economy this year, led by China and India, International Monetary Fund official John Lipsky said earlier this month. Asia’s economy will expand by about 8.5 percent in 2010, Lipsky said, while the world economy is forecast to grow by about 4 percent this year. Forty-five percent of investors in Deutsche Bank’s survey said they would add investments in funds focusing on Asia outside of Japan this year, contrasting with 18 percent in 2009. For Japan, 24 percent of investors plan to add to their Japanese allocations this year, compared with 15 percent in 2009. “People are coming here looking for very good investment ideas and that now is translating directly through the startup market,” Capstick said. “We spend a very large amount of time meeting with people who are starting up hedge funds. Our role is to find which ones are going to flourish.” The eighth Deutsche Bank alternative investment survey polled asset managers, corporations, family offices, foundations and endowments, funds of funds, insurers, private banks, pension funds and investment consultants with more than $1.07 trillion of hedge fund assets in January. Hedge funds are mostly private pools of capital whose managers participate substantially in the profits from their speculation on whether the price of assets will rise or fall. To contact the reporters on this story: Tomoko Yamazaki in Tokyo at tyamazaki@bloomberg.net ; Komaki Ito in Tokyo at kito@bloomberg.net

Read the full article →

Japan’s February Retail Sales Rise 4.2%, Fastest Pace in More Than Decade

March 28, 2010

By Aki Ito March 29 (Bloomberg) — Japan’s retail sales gained at the fastest pace in more than a decade in February as the economic recovery spread to households. Sales rose 4.2 percent from a year earlier, the Trade Ministry said today in Tokyo, the biggest monthly jump since 1997. The median estimate of 12 economists surveyed was for a 1.6 percent climb. An export-fueled recovery and emergency stimulus spending are beginning to create jobs and support wages, improving prospects for companies including Dydo Drinco Inc. and Seven & I Holdings Co. Shares of retailers advanced after the report, and economists said the unexpected surge shows consumer outlays aren’t confined to goods supported by government measures. “Today’s report was much stronger than expectations,” said Hiroshi Shiraishi , an economist at BNP Paribas in Tokyo. “Because of the export rebound, profits are recovering, and that’s helping support wages and jobs. Consumer spending won’t make big drops ahead even when the stimulus starts to fade.” The yen traded at 92.65 per dollar at 11:09 a.m. in Tokyo from 92.44 before the report was published. The Topix Retail Trade Index rose 0.5 percent, outperforming the broader Topix Index, which fell 0.3 percent. The last time retail sales surged this much was when they advanced 12.4 percent in March 1997, a month before Japan raised the consumption tax to 5 percent from 3 percent. Higher demand for energy-efficient vehicles and flat-screen televisions bolstered sales last month, the government said. Clothing sales advanced 8.4 percent. Improving Market Seven & I, Japan’s largest retailer, gained 3.6 percent in Tokyo trading today after Morgan Stanley raised its rating on the stock to “overweight.” The operator of 7-Eleven convenience stores and Ito-Yokado supermarkets will benefit from a slower decline in consumer prices and an improving labor market, Morgan Stanley said in a report published March 26. From a month earlier, retail sales unexpectedly climbed 0.9 percent, the second consecutive gain. None of the eight economists surveyed by Bloomberg News predicted an increase, and their median estimate was for a 1.2 percent drop. Sales in the month ended March 20 at Dydo Drinco, a beverage maker, gained 7.2 percent from a year earlier. Consumer confidence advanced for a second month in February, led by sentiment about employment, a sign households may boost outlays in coming months as fears of being fired recede. Higher sentiment may help offset the unwinding of emergency government spending programs that gave consumers incentives to buy durable goods. ‘Lasting Positive Impact’ “Even though the boost will fade, you’re still going to get a lasting positive impact” from the stimulus, Julian Jessop , chief international economist at Capital Economics Ltd. in London, said before the report. Japan’s economy added the most jobs in more than three decades in January and workers’ pay declined at the slowest pace in 19 months. A report tomorrow will show the unemployment rate probably held at a 10-month low of 4.9 percent in February, according to the median forecast of 23 economists. Prime Minister Yukio Hatoyama won approval for his record 92.3 trillion yen ($996 billion) budget last week, securing funding to implement cornerstone election pledges to give households childcare handouts and provide free tuition at public high schools ahead of a July upper house election. Cheaper Prices Not all analysts are convinced the consumer outlays can be sustained. Households continue to demand lower prices for their products, threatening to erode the profit margins of retailers. “Consumer spending can’t increase regardless of jobs and incomes, which appear to have stopped declining but have failed to gained momentum,” said Hiroshi Watanabe , an economist at Daiwa Institute of Research in Tokyo. “The economy will only improve at a very moderate pace.” Daisyo Corp. , a Japanese style pub operator, reversed its full-year forecast to a net loss of 270 million yen from a 500 million yen profit, saying that an intensifying pricing war has made it difficult to boost sales. Richard Jerram , chief Asia economist at Macquarie Securities Ltd. in Tokyo, says a better labor market won’t boost the economy enough to end the country’s bout of deflation. Consumer prices excluding fresh food, the Bank of Japan’s preferred gauge of inflation, dropped 1.2 percent in February, prompting Finance Minister Naoto Kan to say that “more efforts” are needed to beat deflation. The central bank doubled a credit program to commercial lenders this month to 20 trillion yen. To contact the reporter on this story: Aki Ito in Tokyo at aito16@bloomberg.net

Read the full article →

Treasuries Find Greenspan’s Canary Growing Faint in Government Bond Mine

March 28, 2010

By Susanne Walker March 29 (Bloomberg) — Former Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan’s warning that rising yields on government debt will drive up American borrowing costs is resonating with the world’s biggest bond traders, who say this month’s losses in the market for U.S. Treasuries are just the beginning. Yields on 10-year notes, the benchmark for everything from mortgages to corporate bonds, climbed as high as 3.92 percent last week from a low of 3.53 percent in February. The 18 primary dealers of U.S. debt forecast the rate will reach 4.2 percent this year, the highest since October 2008, according to the median estimate in a survey by Bloomberg News. Higher yields are the “canary in the mine,” Greenspan said in a March 26 interview on Bloomberg Television’s ‘‘Political Capital With Al Hunt.” The increases reflect concern over “this huge overhang of federal debt which we have never seen before,” he said. The budget deficit , which hit $1.4 trillion in fiscal 2009, will drive Treasury sales to a record $2.43 trillion this year, a February survey of 10 dealers showed. “Bonds have seen their best days,” Bill Gross , manager of the world’s biggest bond fund at Pacific Investment Management Co., said in a March 25 interview with Tom Keene on Bloomberg radio from Pimco’s headquarters in Newport Beach, California. While Treasuries returned 0.9 percent this year, they fell after each of the government’s three note auctions last week, which drew less demand than traders estimated. Economists and strategists also predict rising yields in Germany, the U.K., Canada, Japan and the rest of world’s major economies, Bloomberg surveys show. Snowstorms, Greece “The rally in Treasuries is over,” said James Caron , head of U.S. interest-rate strategy at Morgan Stanley in New York. Storms in January and February, and concerns that Greece would default “slowed growth to a great degree,” he said. “Now things are normalizing and other indicators are showing the economy is getting better.” Morgan Stanley says U.S. yields will rise to 5.5 percent by year-end, from a nine-month high of 3.92 percent on March 25. Caron’s estimate is the highest among the primary dealers obligated to bid at government auctions. Treasuries would lose about 8.8 percent should the estimate prove correct. The 10-year Treasury yield rose 16 basis points, or 0.16 percentage point, last week to 3.85 percent, the biggest weekly increase since December. The 3.65 percent note due February 2020 fell 1 1/4, or $12.50 per $1,000 face amount, to 98 6/32, according to BGCantor Market Data. Rally Fades Treasuries surged at the start of the year, with Bank of America Merrill Lynch’s U.S. Treasury Master index gaining 1.58 percent in January, as investors sought the safety of government debt on speculation that the global recovery would falter. Those doubts diminished in February as returns slowed to 0.4 percent and disappeared this month as bonds lost 1.07 percent. Primary dealers say the losses will worsen as the U.S. economy rebounds from the worst financial turmoil since the Great Depression. Ten of the 18 dealers say the Fed will raise its target rate for overnight loans between banks before 2011. “We are no longer in the height of the financial crisis,” said Michael Pond , an interest-rate strategist in New York at Barclays Plc. “Many investors wouldn’t buy into the sustainability of the recovery until it came along with job creation. We’ll see that with this month’s employment report and those positive prints will continue.” The Labor Department may say April 2 that the U.S. added 190,000 jobs this month, after losing 36,000 in February, according to the median estimate of 62 economists surveyed by Bloomberg. Auction Demand The global economy will expand 3.6 percent in 2010, the median of 51 estimates in a separate Bloomberg survey shows, more than the 3 percent forecast they made six months ago. JPMorgan Chase & Co. expects global growth to reach “an above- trend 3.4 percent pace” as confidence improves and labor markets recover, according to a March 18 report. Bonds fell on March 23 after the Treasury’s $44 billion sale of two-year notes drew the weakest demand since December. The next day, five-year notes tumbled the most in seven months as the U.S. sold $42 billion at a higher yield than dealers forecast. Treasuries declined again on March 25 when the $32 billion auction of seven-year notes attracted the lowest ratio of bids received compared with those accepted in 10 months. Gross, who runs the $214 billion Total Return Fund , said investors should avoid the debt of the U.K. and invest in shorter-maturity U.S. and Brazilian securities and longer-term German and “core” Europe bonds. Goldman Bullish Goldman Sachs Group Inc., the world’s most profitable securities firm, is bullish on bonds. It expects inflation will remain in check as the economy expands slower than investors anticipate. Consumer prices excluding food and energy will rise at a 1 percent annual rate over the next few months, from 1.3 percent in February, the firm predicts. “Short-term U.S. interest rates will remain at rock-bottom levels for much longer than markets currently expect,” Jan Hatzius , Goldman’s chief U.S. economist, wrote in a report to clients on March 24. Goldman predicts 10-year yields will drop to 3.25 percent by year-end, the lowest of any of the primary dealers. The firm forecast at the start of 2009 the yield would end that year at 3.2 percent. It finished at 3.84 percent. While consumer prices are barely rising now, Gross said inflation will accelerate as countries sell record amounts of debt to finance deficits. Pimco announced in December that it would offer stock funds for the first time. Bunds, JGBs, Gilts The yield on the 10-year German bund will climb to 3.7 percent from 3.15 percent by the end of 2010, according to the median forecast of 17 firms in a Bloomberg News survey. Yields on Japanese government bonds of similar maturity will increase to 1.47 percent from 1.38 percent, and those in the U.K. will jump to 4.51 percent from 4.03 percent, separate surveys show. “There will be a steady march higher in sovereign debt costs,” said William O’Donnell , U.S. government bond strategist at primary dealer Royal Bank of Scotland Group Plc, in Stamford, Connecticut. “Debt service as a percentage of government expenditures will rise. There will be pressure on disposable income because household debt costs should rise.” America will use about 7 percent of tax revenue for debt payment in 2010 and almost 11 percent in 2013, while the U.K. is likely to spend 9 percent in 2013, rising to almost 12 percent under what Moody’s Investors Service describes as “adverse” scenarios. Greenspan’s Buffer Historically, there has been “a large buffer between the level of our federal debt and our capacity to borrow,” Greenspan said. “That’s narrowing. And I’m finding it very difficult to look into the future and not worry about that.” Rates for 30-year fixed U.S. mortgages rose to 4.99 percent for the week ended March 25, the highest since the period ended Feb. 25, McLean, Virginia-based Freddie Mac said in a statement. The extra yield investors demand to own corporate bonds rather than government debt shrank to the narrowest since November 2007 as faster economic growth has more than compensated for rising Treasury yields. Spreads have tightened to 151 basis points as of March 26, according to Bank of America Merrill Lynch’s Global Broad Market Corporate Index. The Fed cited evidence the recovery will be slow on March 16, when it reiterated rates will stay low for an “extended” period. The central bank has kept its target rate for overnight loans between banks in a range of zero to 0.25 percent since December 2008. “Economic conditions, including low rates of resource utilization, subdued inflation trends, and stable inflation expectations, are likely to warrant exceptionally low levels of the federal funds rate for an extended period,” the Federal Open Market Committee said in its statement. Too Cautious Fed Primary dealers say policy makers led by Chairman Ben S. Bernanke may be too cautious. They see the Fed raising rates to 1 percent on average this year as demand increases for cash to invest in riskier securities such as stocks and corporate bonds. “Risk appetites are rising and bonds will likely suffer,” Morgan Stanley’s Caron said. The 0.89 percent gain in Treasuries this quarter compares with 4.56 percent for the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index, 4.64 percent for speculative grade bonds, and a 2.2 percent loss for the S&P/GSCI Index of Commodities. “A labor market snapback will push the Fed into play,” said Carl Riccadonna , a senior economist in New York at Deutsche Bank AG. “They are moving in a less accommodative direction, but they will still be extremely accommodative. The peak in the unemployment rate came last fall. We should see sharper improvement over the next couple of months.” Deutsche forecasts the Fed will raise rates by August and to 1.25 percent by 2011. That rate is “not even approaching restrictive,” Riccadonna said. Following are the results of Bloomberg’s survey, conducted from March 22 to March 26. All values are for year-end: To contact the reporter on this story: Susanne Walker in New York at swalker33@bloomberg.net

Read the full article →

Treasuries Find Greenspan’s Canary Growing Faint in Government Bond Mine

March 28, 2010

By Susanne Walker March 29 (Bloomberg) — Former Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan’s warning that rising yields on government debt will drive up American borrowing costs is resonating with the world’s biggest bond traders, who say this month’s losses in the market for U.S. Treasuries are just the beginning. Yields on 10-year notes, the benchmark for everything from mortgages to corporate bonds, climbed as high as 3.92 percent last week from a low of 3.53 percent in February. The 18 primary dealers of U.S. debt forecast the rate will reach 4.2 percent this year, the highest since October 2008, according to the median estimate in a survey by Bloomberg News. Higher yields are the “canary in the mine,” Greenspan said in a March 26 interview on Bloomberg Television’s ‘‘Political Capital With Al Hunt.” The increases reflect concern over “this huge overhang of federal debt which we have never seen before,” he said. The budget deficit , which hit $1.4 trillion in fiscal 2009, will drive Treasury sales to a record $2.43 trillion this year, a February survey of 10 dealers showed. “Bonds have seen their best days,” Bill Gross , manager of the world’s biggest bond fund at Pacific Investment Management Co., said in a March 25 interview with Tom Keene on Bloomberg radio from Pimco’s headquarters in Newport Beach, California. While Treasuries returned 0.9 percent this year, they fell after each of the government’s three note auctions last week, which drew less demand than traders estimated. Economists and strategists also predict rising yields in Germany, the U.K., Canada, Japan and the rest of world’s major economies, Bloomberg surveys show. Snowstorms, Greece “The rally in Treasuries is over,” said James Caron , head of U.S. interest-rate strategy at Morgan Stanley in New York. Storms in January and February, and concerns that Greece would default “slowed growth to a great degree,” he said. “Now things are normalizing and other indicators are showing the economy is getting better.” Morgan Stanley says U.S. yields will rise to 5.5 percent by year-end, from a nine-month high of 3.92 percent on March 25. Caron’s estimate is the highest among the primary dealers obligated to bid at government auctions. Treasuries would lose about 8.8 percent should the estimate prove correct. The 10-year Treasury yield rose 16 basis points, or 0.16 percentage point, last week to 3.85 percent, the biggest weekly increase since December. The 3.65 percent note due February 2020 fell 1 1/4, or $12.50 per $1,000 face amount, to 98 6/32, according to BGCantor Market Data. Rally Fades Treasuries surged at the start of the year, with Bank of America Merrill Lynch’s U.S. Treasury Master index gaining 1.58 percent in January, as investors sought the safety of government debt on speculation that the global recovery would falter. Those doubts diminished in February as returns slowed to 0.4 percent and disappeared this month as bonds lost 1.07 percent. Primary dealers say the losses will worsen as the U.S. economy rebounds from the worst financial turmoil since the Great Depression. Ten of the 18 dealers say the Fed will raise its target rate for overnight loans between banks before 2011. “We are no longer in the height of the financial crisis,” said Michael Pond , an interest-rate strategist in New York at Barclays Plc. “Many investors wouldn’t buy into the sustainability of the recovery until it came along with job creation. We’ll see that with this month’s employment report and those positive prints will continue.” The Labor Department may say April 2 that the U.S. added 190,000 jobs this month, after losing 36,000 in February, according to the median estimate of 62 economists surveyed by Bloomberg. Auction Demand The global economy will expand 3.6 percent in 2010, the median of 51 estimates in a separate Bloomberg survey shows, more than the 3 percent forecast they made six months ago. JPMorgan Chase & Co. expects global growth to reach “an above- trend 3.4 percent pace” as confidence improves and labor markets recover, according to a March 18 report. Bonds fell on March 23 after the Treasury’s $44 billion sale of two-year notes drew the weakest demand since December. The next day, five-year notes tumbled the most in seven months as the U.S. sold $42 billion at a higher yield than dealers forecast. Treasuries declined again on March 25 when the $32 billion auction of seven-year notes attracted the lowest ratio of bids received compared with those accepted in 10 months. Gross, who runs the $214 billion Total Return Fund , said investors should avoid the debt of the U.K. and invest in shorter-maturity U.S. and Brazilian securities and longer-term German and “core” Europe bonds. Goldman Bullish Goldman Sachs Group Inc., the world’s most profitable securities firm, is bullish on bonds. It expects inflation will remain in check as the economy expands slower than investors anticipate. Consumer prices excluding food and energy will rise at a 1 percent annual rate over the next few months, from 1.3 percent in February, the firm predicts. “Short-term U.S. interest rates will remain at rock-bottom levels for much longer than markets currently expect,” Jan Hatzius , Goldman’s chief U.S. economist, wrote in a report to clients on March 24. Goldman predicts 10-year yields will drop to 3.25 percent by year-end, the lowest of any of the primary dealers. The firm forecast at the start of 2009 the yield would end that year at 3.2 percent. It finished at 3.84 percent. While consumer prices are barely rising now, Gross said inflation will accelerate as countries sell record amounts of debt to finance deficits. Pimco announced in December that it would offer stock funds for the first time. Bunds, JGBs, Gilts The yield on the 10-year German bund will climb to 3.7 percent from 3.15 percent by the end of 2010, according to the median forecast of 17 firms in a Bloomberg News survey. Yields on Japanese government bonds of similar maturity will increase to 1.47 percent from 1.38 percent, and those in the U.K. will jump to 4.51 percent from 4.03 percent, separate surveys show. “There will be a steady march higher in sovereign debt costs,” said William O’Donnell , U.S. government bond strategist at primary dealer Royal Bank of Scotland Group Plc, in Stamford, Connecticut. “Debt service as a percentage of government expenditures will rise. There will be pressure on disposable income because household debt costs should rise.” America will use about 7 percent of tax revenue for debt payment in 2010 and almost 11 percent in 2013, while the U.K. is likely to spend 9 percent in 2013, rising to almost 12 percent under what Moody’s Investors Service describes as “adverse” scenarios. Greenspan’s Buffer Historically, there has been “a large buffer between the level of our federal debt and our capacity to borrow,” Greenspan said. “That’s narrowing. And I’m finding it very difficult to look into the future and not worry about that.” Rates for 30-year fixed U.S. mortgages rose to 4.99 percent for the week ended March 25, the highest since the period ended Feb. 25, McLean, Virginia-based Freddie Mac said in a statement. The extra yield investors demand to own corporate bonds rather than government debt shrank to the narrowest since November 2007 as faster economic growth has more than compensated for rising Treasury yields. Spreads have tightened to 151 basis points as of March 26, according to Bank of America Merrill Lynch’s Global Broad Market Corporate Index. The Fed cited evidence the recovery will be slow on March 16, when it reiterated rates will stay low for an “extended” period. The central bank has kept its target rate for overnight loans between banks in a range of zero to 0.25 percent since December 2008. “Economic conditions, including low rates of resource utilization, subdued inflation trends, and stable inflation expectations, are likely to warrant exceptionally low levels of the federal funds rate for an extended period,” the Federal Open Market Committee said in its statement. Too Cautious Fed Primary dealers say policy makers led by Chairman Ben S. Bernanke may be too cautious. They see the Fed raising rates to 1 percent on average this year as demand increases for cash to invest in riskier securities such as stocks and corporate bonds. “Risk appetites are rising and bonds will likely suffer,” Morgan Stanley’s Caron said. The 0.89 percent gain in Treasuries this quarter compares with 4.56 percent for the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index, 4.64 percent for speculative grade bonds, and a 2.2 percent loss for the S&P/GSCI Index of Commodities. “A labor market snapback will push the Fed into play,” said Carl Riccadonna , a senior economist in New York at Deutsche Bank AG. “They are moving in a less accommodative direction, but they will still be extremely accommodative. The peak in the unemployment rate came last fall. We should see sharper improvement over the next couple of months.” Deutsche forecasts the Fed will raise rates by August and to 1.25 percent by 2011. That rate is “not even approaching restrictive,” Riccadonna said. Following are the results of Bloomberg’s survey, conducted from March 22 to March 26. All values are for year-end: To contact the reporter on this story: Susanne Walker in New York at swalker33@bloomberg.net

Read the full article →

Euro Rises Against Dollar as Greece Aid Plan Boosts Confidence in Europe

March 28, 2010

By Yoshiaki Nohara and Ron Harui March 29 (Bloomberg) — The euro strengthened against the dollar for a second day on receding concern Greece’s financial crisis will derail the 16-nation region’s economic recovery. The euro advanced against 11 of its 16 major counterparts before a report today forecast to show European economic confidence rose to the highest since June 2008. The yen headed for its first monthly decline versus the Australian dollar since December amid signs the world’s second-largest economy is recovering, spurring demand for higher-yielding assets. “The euro has been benefiting from an agreement on Friday among European leaders that a rescue package for Greece is required,” said Mike Jones , a currency strategist at Bank of New Zealand Ltd. in Wellington. “We’ve seen a bit of bounce in the euro on Friday, and that advance has continued into this morning.” The euro strengthened to $1.3430 at 10:21 a.m. in Tokyo from $1.3410 in New York on March 26. The euro has declined 6.2 percent against the dollar in the quarter ending March 31, the most since the three months ended Sept. 30, 2008. Europe’s currency rose to 124.32 yen from 124.06 yen. The dollar fetched 92.59 yen from 92.52 yen. It touched 92.96 yen on March 25, the highest since Jan. 8. The EU and International Monetary Fund pledged last week to help Greece finance the region’s biggest budget deficit if it runs out of options in capital markets. ‘Worst-Case Risks’ “As concern eased about worst-case risks, such a Greek default or delay in debt repayment, the euro advanced against major currencies,” strategists at Barclays Plc led by Masafumi Yamamoto , chief foreign-exchange strategist in Tokyo, wrote in a Japanese-language research note today. An index of executive and consumer sentiment in the 16 nations using the euro rose to 97.1 this month from 95.9 in February, according to the median estimate of economists in a Bloomberg News survey. The European Commission in Brussels is scheduled to release the data today. Japan’s retail sales advanced 4.2 percent in February from a year earlier, the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry said today in Tokyo. The Bank of Japan’s Tankan business confidence index rose to minus 14 in the first quarter from minus 24 in the three months ended in December, a separate Bloomberg survey showed before the April 1 report. ‘Upside Risks’ “We see mild upside risks to the Australian dollar against the yen this week as good Japanese data usually encourages Japanese investors to invest offshore on a more positive view about the global economy,” Joseph Capurso , a currency strategist in Sydney at Commonwealth Bank of Australia, wrote in a research note today. The benchmark interest rate of 0.1 percent in Japan compares with 4 percent in Australia, attracting investors to the South Pacific nation’s assets. The risk in such trades is that currency market moves will erase profits. Japan’s currency slipped 0.3 percent to 83.88 per Australian dollar today, and was poised for a 5 percent decline this month, the biggest drop among 16 most-active currencies. The dollar was near an 11-week high against the yen before a government report this week forecast to show U.S. payrolls rose the most in three years, adding to signs the U.S. economic recovery is gathering momentum. The Federal Reserve has pledged to keep benchmark rates low “for an extended period” to support an economic recovery. “As jobs data improve, expectations may rise that the Fed will remove ‘an extended period’ language in late April,” said Koji Fukaya , a senior currency strategist in Tokyo at Deutsche Bank AG. “The dollar-yen will remain in an uptrend.” The U.S. added 190,000 jobs in March, the most since March 2007, according to the median estimate of economists in a Bloomberg News survey before the Labor Department’s data due on April 2. ADP Employer Services is also forecast to report on March 31 that U.S. firms added 40,000 jobs this month, halting job losses that have lasted for two years, according to a separate survey. To contact the reporters on this story: Yoshiaki Nohara in Tokyo at ynohara1@bloomberg.net ; Ron Harui in Singapore at rharui@bloomberg.net .

Read the full article →

Euro Rises Against Dollar as Greece Aid Plan Boosts Confidence in Europe

March 28, 2010

By Yoshiaki Nohara and Ron Harui March 29 (Bloomberg) — The euro strengthened against the dollar for a second day on receding concern Greece’s financial crisis will derail the 16-nation region’s economic recovery. The euro advanced against 11 of its 16 major counterparts before a report today forecast to show European economic confidence rose to the highest since June 2008. The yen headed for its first monthly decline versus the Australian dollar since December amid signs the world’s second-largest economy is recovering, spurring demand for higher-yielding assets. “The euro has been benefiting from an agreement on Friday among European leaders that a rescue package for Greece is required,” said Mike Jones , a currency strategist at Bank of New Zealand Ltd. in Wellington. “We’ve seen a bit of bounce in the euro on Friday, and that advance has continued into this morning.” The euro strengthened to $1.3430 at 10:21 a.m. in Tokyo from $1.3410 in New York on March 26. The euro has declined 6.2 percent against the dollar in the quarter ending March 31, the most since the three months ended Sept. 30, 2008. Europe’s currency rose to 124.32 yen from 124.06 yen. The dollar fetched 92.59 yen from 92.52 yen. It touched 92.96 yen on March 25, the highest since Jan. 8. The EU and International Monetary Fund pledged last week to help Greece finance the region’s biggest budget deficit if it runs out of options in capital markets. ‘Worst-Case Risks’ “As concern eased about worst-case risks, such a Greek default or delay in debt repayment, the euro advanced against major currencies,” strategists at Barclays Plc led by Masafumi Yamamoto , chief foreign-exchange strategist in Tokyo, wrote in a Japanese-language research note today. An index of executive and consumer sentiment in the 16 nations using the euro rose to 97.1 this month from 95.9 in February, according to the median estimate of economists in a Bloomberg News survey. The European Commission in Brussels is scheduled to release the data today. Japan’s retail sales advanced 4.2 percent in February from a year earlier, the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry said today in Tokyo. The Bank of Japan’s Tankan business confidence index rose to minus 14 in the first quarter from minus 24 in the three months ended in December, a separate Bloomberg survey showed before the April 1 report. ‘Upside Risks’ “We see mild upside risks to the Australian dollar against the yen this week as good Japanese data usually encourages Japanese investors to invest offshore on a more positive view about the global economy,” Joseph Capurso , a currency strategist in Sydney at Commonwealth Bank of Australia, wrote in a research note today. The benchmark interest rate of 0.1 percent in Japan compares with 4 percent in Australia, attracting investors to the South Pacific nation’s assets. The risk in such trades is that currency market moves will erase profits. Japan’s currency slipped 0.3 percent to 83.88 per Australian dollar today, and was poised for a 5 percent decline this month, the biggest drop among 16 most-active currencies. The dollar was near an 11-week high against the yen before a government report this week forecast to show U.S. payrolls rose the most in three years, adding to signs the U.S. economic recovery is gathering momentum. The Federal Reserve has pledged to keep benchmark rates low “for an extended period” to support an economic recovery. “As jobs data improve, expectations may rise that the Fed will remove ‘an extended period’ language in late April,” said Koji Fukaya , a senior currency strategist in Tokyo at Deutsche Bank AG. “The dollar-yen will remain in an uptrend.” The U.S. added 190,000 jobs in March, the most since March 2007, according to the median estimate of economists in a Bloomberg News survey before the Labor Department’s data due on April 2. ADP Employer Services is also forecast to report on March 31 that U.S. firms added 40,000 jobs this month, halting job losses that have lasted for two years, according to a separate survey. To contact the reporters on this story: Yoshiaki Nohara in Tokyo at ynohara1@bloomberg.net ; Ron Harui in Singapore at rharui@bloomberg.net .

Read the full article →

Goldman Sachs Capitulation on Dollar Leads Turnaround on Outlook for U.S.

March 28, 2010

By Oliver Biggadike and Inyoung Hwang

Read the full article →

Goldman Sachs Capitulation on Dollar Leads Turnaround on Outlook for U.S.

March 28, 2010

By Oliver Biggadike and Inyoung Hwang

Read the full article →

Alan Schram: Where Did Inflation Go?

March 28, 2010

For those concerned about incipient inflation resulting from the gargantuan monetary expansion we had over the past 18 months and the budget deficits we are still running, the lack of inflation is confounding. One explanation is that the Consumer Price Index is inaccurate and misleading. For example, a third of the consumer price index is Owners’ Equivalent Rent, an artificial addition put into the CPI in 1980. In the go-go years of housing, real estate prices were up much more than the Owners Equivalent Rent, and the actual cost of living went up by about 7%. The CPI did not reflect that. Remove housing costs from the CPI, and inflation is back. In January the CPI was up 5.8% on an annualized basis, excluding owners-equivalent rent. Another important explanation is that historically, inflation lags growth in the money supply by at least a year. By that measure, we should expect inflation by the end of 2010. This happens because in a recession, demand falls and business activity declines. Businesses cut prices and reduce their borrowings. The Fed expands the money supply aggressively as a way to counter the recession. Inflation is the result of money supply growing at a higher rate than the goods and services in the economy. Right now commodity prices are starting to rise again, and it seems businesses are done lowering prices. The economy hasn’t caught up yet with the past decline. The slack left over from the recession is keeping inflationary pressures in check. This is why inflation lags. During the early stages of the business cycle, government deficits actually coincide with lower interest rates. Currently, the Federal Reserve set short term interest rates at almost zero. But this is temporary. Companies have become much more lean and competitive with the wave of streamlining that was forced on them by this deep recession. And as the economy begins to recover, both business and individual borrowing will increase, putting upward pressure on interest rates and fueling inflation. And if low interest rates trigger higher housing prices, inflation will be demonstrably higher. It isn’t all bad. Higher inflation might shrink the mountain of debt: Nonfederal government debt, now about $27 trillion, is almost four times as large as federal government debt (about $7.2 trillion). After all, it worked before. In 1946, post World War II, US national debt was 122% of GDP. Ten years of 4% average inflation later, it was half that. Inflation seems subdued now, but in light of the political constraints facing Social Security, Medicare and other entitlement spending, it is an inescapable certainty. At some point we will have to deal with the pernicious effects of a credit system flush with cash. Either we sharply reduce the growth in government spending or witness a steep rise in inflation. Alan Schram is the Managing Partner of Wellcap Partners, a Los Angeles based investment firm. Email at aschram@wellcappartners.com.

Read the full article →

Alan Schram: Where Did Inflation Go?

March 28, 2010

For those concerned about incipient inflation resulting from the gargantuan monetary expansion we had over the past 18 months and the budget deficits we are still running, the lack of inflation is confounding. One explanation is that the Consumer Price Index is inaccurate and misleading. For example, a third of the consumer price index is Owners’ Equivalent Rent, an artificial addition put into the CPI in 1980. In the go-go years of housing, real estate prices were up much more than the Owners Equivalent Rent, and the actual cost of living went up by about 7%. The CPI did not reflect that. Remove housing costs from the CPI, and inflation is back. In January the CPI was up 5.8% on an annualized basis, excluding owners-equivalent rent. Another important explanation is that historically, inflation lags growth in the money supply by at least a year. By that measure, we should expect inflation by the end of 2010. This happens because in a recession, demand falls and business activity declines. Businesses cut prices and reduce their borrowings. The Fed expands the money supply aggressively as a way to counter the recession. Inflation is the result of money supply growing at a higher rate than the goods and services in the economy. Right now commodity prices are starting to rise again, and it seems businesses are done lowering prices. The economy hasn’t caught up yet with the past decline. The slack left over from the recession is keeping inflationary pressures in check. This is why inflation lags. During the early stages of the business cycle, government deficits actually coincide with lower interest rates. Currently, the Federal Reserve set short term interest rates at almost zero. But this is temporary. Companies have become much more lean and competitive with the wave of streamlining that was forced on them by this deep recession. And as the economy begins to recover, both business and individual borrowing will increase, putting upward pressure on interest rates and fueling inflation. And if low interest rates trigger higher housing prices, inflation will be demonstrably higher. It isn’t all bad. Higher inflation might shrink the mountain of debt: Nonfederal government debt, now about $27 trillion, is almost four times as large as federal government debt (about $7.2 trillion). After all, it worked before. In 1946, post World War II, US national debt was 122% of GDP. Ten years of 4% average inflation later, it was half that. Inflation seems subdued now, but in light of the political constraints facing Social Security, Medicare and other entitlement spending, it is an inescapable certainty. At some point we will have to deal with the pernicious effects of a credit system flush with cash. Either we sharply reduce the growth in government spending or witness a steep rise in inflation. Alan Schram is the Managing Partner of Wellcap Partners, a Los Angeles based investment firm. Email at aschram@wellcappartners.com.

Read the full article →

Vicky Ward: How Lehman’s Hidden Inner Circle Brought the Bank Down

March 28, 2010

Senator Spencer Bacchus, the top Republican on the House Financial Services Committee is quite right to write to Lehman bankruptcy examiner Anton J. Valukas and ask to review communications between the Federal Reserve and the Securities and Exchange Commission about Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc, in preparation for an April 20 hearing into the Valukas report. He wants to know what exactly the SEC found out while it was inside Lehman — or more importantly what it missed. In his letter to Valukas. Bacchus wrote that Lehman “used accounting gimmicks to hide its debt and mask its insolvency…More disturbing, the examiner’s report also describes what appear to be significant failings on the part of officials” at the SEC and the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. The SEC and FED, after all, were inside Lehman Brothers for the last six months of its life. How did they miss all this? Sen. Chris Dodd, the Senate banking chair has asked former Lehman chief Dick Fuld to return to testify exactly how Lehman misled so many people. (Fuld’s lawyer has said Fuld had never heard of Repo 105, the accounting tool by which Lehman moved $50 billion of its balance sheets…) Perhaps some explanation may lie in an email I received today from one of Lehman’s most senior employees — someone who worked there for 17 years. He wrote to me off the record so I am not at liberty to disclose his identity, but he was very senior and widely respected. He is not the only Lehmanite to have responded to my new book, The Devil’s Casino (Wiley). Many have thanked me for exposing a culture led (and ruined) by a tiny leadership that was egregious, isolated and mendacious. Without exception, Lehman readers have told me I got it absolutely right — and — in particular they have agreed with today’s New York Post ‘s article which noted that the book maintains that Lehman’s president Joe Gregory was actually the chief villain at the firm, responsible for much of the over-risky leverage, and not so much Dick Fuld. (Incidentally all the e-mailers and callers have agreed that their wives loathed being “married to Lehman” as the book points out in one chapter.) What my e-mailer of today however points out is something that both Rep. Bacchus and Sen. Dodd may find useful as they follow up on Valukas’s report. He wrote, “like many former colleagues, I’m astonished at how much we didn’t know about the workings of the inner circle.” Note the last three words. “The Inner Circle.” This was not the whole Lehman’s executive committee. This was Fuld, Gregory, perhaps in reverse order, and then Gregory’s pet of the month, at one point Erin Callan, at another Mark Walsh. But it was a tiny unit, cut off from the rest of Lehman. He follows up. Dick’s hardly the gorilla. He’s funny, passionate, caring, competitive, and serious about the business. In a way, he almost cared too much about Lehman and its employees. Unfortunately, Joe G’s characterization highly-accurate. The commercial real estate book alone did not sink Lehman. Enormous and wrong prop bets on European interest rates in mid-2008 (FID chief Andy Morton moved on) and Alt-A MBS in NY also hurt. As detailed in Examiner’s Report …real estate exposure went against recommendation of firm’s own research department beginning in 2005. Why? The “growth engine” had to be fed. And internal politics. Realize that space did not allow a full consideration of so many other terrific contributors and positive firm attributes. For example, No. 1 U.S. bond house for nearly a quarter century thanks to so many terrific capital market soldiers (sales, trading, research, syndicate) trying to do the right thing for their clients. And starting in 1973, Lehman ran world’s largest debt index franchise that helped bolster its international reputation…. In the end, Paulson correct. Too many people in same seats for too long. Lehman would have been still standing if Mike Gelband had not been fired in 2007 for telling the truth and if the Lehman’s most competent executive, Bart McDade, had been elevated to president before 2008. So, here we have Lehman: “An inner circle” at the top cut off from the rest. It fires people for telling the truth, and fails to promote the most competent executive until too late…. This culture didn’t spring up in its last few months…it festered for years. Whatever the SEC and FED missed in the bank’s final six months, the cabal at the top was already set in its ways and adept at hiding what it was really doing from not just the SEC, Fed and market — but its own senior management. That really is a horrifying culture, and one I am delighted to have exposed. Vicky Ward is the author of The Devil’s Casino: Friendship, Betrayal and the High-Stakes Games Played Inside Lehman Brothers

Read the full article →

Vicky Ward: How Lehman’s Hidden Inner Circle Brought the Bank Down

March 28, 2010

Senator Spencer Bacchus, the top Republican on the House Financial Services Committee is quite right to write to Lehman bankruptcy examiner Anton J. Valukas and ask to review communications between the Federal Reserve and the Securities and Exchange Commission about Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc, in preparation for an April 20 hearing into the Valukas report. He wants to know what exactly the SEC found out while it was inside Lehman — or more importantly what it missed. In his letter to Valukas. Bacchus wrote that Lehman “used accounting gimmicks to hide its debt and mask its insolvency…More disturbing, the examiner’s report also describes what appear to be significant failings on the part of officials” at the SEC and the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. The SEC and FED, after all, were inside Lehman Brothers for the last six months of its life. How did they miss all this? Sen. Chris Dodd, the Senate banking chair has asked former Lehman chief Dick Fuld to return to testify exactly how Lehman misled so many people. (Fuld’s lawyer has said Fuld had never heard of Repo 105, the accounting tool by which Lehman moved $50 billion of its balance sheets…) Perhaps some explanation may lie in an email I received today from one of Lehman’s most senior employees — someone who worked there for 17 years. He wrote to me off the record so I am not at liberty to disclose his identity, but he was very senior and widely respected. He is not the only Lehmanite to have responded to my new book, The Devil’s Casino (Wiley). Many have thanked me for exposing a culture led (and ruined) by a tiny leadership that was egregious, isolated and mendacious. Without exception, Lehman readers have told me I got it absolutely right — and — in particular they have agreed with today’s New York Post ‘s article which noted that the book maintains that Lehman’s president Joe Gregory was actually the chief villain at the firm, responsible for much of the over-risky leverage, and not so much Dick Fuld. (Incidentally all the e-mailers and callers have agreed that their wives loathed being “married to Lehman” as the book points out in one chapter.) What my e-mailer of today however points out is something that both Rep. Bacchus and Sen. Dodd may find useful as they follow up on Valukas’s report. He wrote, “like many former colleagues, I’m astonished at how much we didn’t know about the workings of the inner circle.” Note the last three words. “The Inner Circle.” This was not the whole Lehman’s executive committee. This was Fuld, Gregory, perhaps in reverse order, and then Gregory’s pet of the month, at one point Erin Callan, at another Mark Walsh. But it was a tiny unit, cut off from the rest of Lehman. He follows up. Dick’s hardly the gorilla. He’s funny, passionate, caring, competitive, and serious about the business. In a way, he almost cared too much about Lehman and its employees. Unfortunately, Joe G’s characterization highly-accurate. The commercial real estate book alone did not sink Lehman. Enormous and wrong prop bets on European interest rates in mid-2008 (FID chief Andy Morton moved on) and Alt-A MBS in NY also hurt. As detailed in Examiner’s Report …real estate exposure went against recommendation of firm’s own research department beginning in 2005. Why? The “growth engine” had to be fed. And internal politics. Realize that space did not allow a full consideration of so many other terrific contributors and positive firm attributes. For example, No. 1 U.S. bond house for nearly a quarter century thanks to so many terrific capital market soldiers (sales, trading, research, syndicate) trying to do the right thing for their clients. And starting in 1973, Lehman ran world’s largest debt index franchise that helped bolster its international reputation…. In the end, Paulson correct. Too many people in same seats for too long. Lehman would have been still standing if Mike Gelband had not been fired in 2007 for telling the truth and if the Lehman’s most competent executive, Bart McDade, had been elevated to president before 2008. So, here we have Lehman: “An inner circle” at the top cut off from the rest. It fires people for telling the truth, and fails to promote the most competent executive until too late…. This culture didn’t spring up in its last few months…it festered for years. Whatever the SEC and FED missed in the bank’s final six months, the cabal at the top was already set in its ways and adept at hiding what it was really doing from not just the SEC, Fed and market — but its own senior management. That really is a horrifying culture, and one I am delighted to have exposed. Vicky Ward is the author of The Devil’s Casino: Friendship, Betrayal and the High-Stakes Games Played Inside Lehman Brothers

Read the full article →

Robert Kuttner: Next, Banking Reform

March 28, 2010

It was a pleasure to see President Obama exercise some leadership and muscle towards health reform, and more recently to pass a true “public option” for student loans. Apparently, the experience of leadership felt good, for the president decided to follow up by deciding to damn the torpedoes and making fifteen recess appointments, including Craig Becker to breathe some life into the National Labor Relations Board. Now, we need to see a similar display of presidential leadership on financial reform. The bill that passed the House last December is far too weak on all of the key issues. Gigantic banking conglomerates will remain “too big to fail.” There is no separation of commercial banking from investment banking or proprietary trading, nor meaningful reform of corrupted credit rating agencies. Regulation of derivatives such as credit default swaps is far too weak. Private equity companies and hedge funds are largely left alone. There is no serious reform of executive compensation. The next generation of bubbles is already incubating while we are still recovering from the damage of the previous one. The Dodd bill that will come before the full Senate later this spring is slightly worse in some respects, slightly better in others. The bill does include a version of Obama’s call to restore the Glass-Steagall wall between commercial and investment banking (the “Volcker Rule”); but where the House bill created an independent consumer financial protection agency, the Dodd bill places this new agency, of all places, in the Federal Reserve. It was the Fed’s total failure to enforce consumer protections on the books that invited the abuses that caused the collapse. The bankruptcy examiner’s revelations in his 2,200 page report about the behavior of Lehman Brothers should cause the White House to rethink its entire approach to financial reform. Basically, Lehman Brothers cooked its books for a few days four times a year, so that its quarterly reports would make the firm look far more solvent than it actually was. It used repurchase agreements (“repos”), which are short term loans, to disguise $30 to 50 billion worth of liabilities. This balance-sheet manipulation began in 2001, according to the examiner, Anton Valukas. This kind of behavior demonstrates the failure of three separate systems that are supposed to protect investors, creditors and the larger economy from willful corporate fraud. First, the Securities and Exchange Commission, which actually had personnel investigating Lehman at the time, and utterly missed what was going on right under the commission’s nose, in a lapse comparable to the Madoff scandal. Second, Lehman’s outside auditors, Ernst and Young, failed to blow the whistle. These abuses mostly occurred after Congress enacted the 2002 Sarbanes-Oxley Act, explicitly to improve corporate auditing in the wake of the Enron fraud. Obviously, though corporate lobbies have been complaining that Sarbanes-Oxley inflicted too much red tape, the Lehman affair demonstrates that it is too weak to do the job. Auditors and executives, in principle anyway, are criminally liable for accounting fraud. But that did not deter Lehman from faking its books and Ernst and Young from going along. According to the examiner’s report, despite the auditor’s acquiescence, Lehman was not able to find a law firm in the US to sign off on its bogus accounting. So Lehman went to the U.K., found a law firm, Linklater’s, to provide an opinion letter under British law okaying the dubious bookkeeping, and then ran the transactions through a London subsidiary. One backstop, that has been weakened in recent years both by Congressional action and by Supreme Court rulings, is the right of investors or creditors injured by fraudulent behavior to sue. The original securities laws of the Roosevelt era envisioned that this kind of litigation–”private right of action”–would keep both corporations, their auditors and the SEC honest. But bipartisan legislation in the 1990s and two major Supreme Court decisions on 1994 and 2008 have effectively eliminated liability for aiding and abetting securities fraud. You can be sure if this right were still available, Ernst and Young would have though twice about giving Lehman a clean bill of health. The politics of financial reform are drastically different from the politics of health care reform. For starters, Wall Street is massively unpopular in the country. By contrast, in the case of health care, some of the bill’s own weaknesses – the mandate, the diversion of Medicare funds, the tax on premiums of high-quality insurance – raised legitimate questions among many voters; Republicans succeed in creating lies about the bill (pulling the plug on Grandma, etc.) that only multiplied concerns. In the end, passing the bill was a genuinely difficult vote for many Democrats. Financial reform is a whole other story. It’s not a difficult vote to tighten restrictions on predator banks (except when it comes to campaign finance). Judging by the recent comments of Senator Bob Corker, one of the senior Republicans on the Senate Banking Committee, Republicans are genuinely worried about finding themselves on the wrong side of a populist issue if they try to block financial reform the same way they tried to block health reform. On financial reform, the real problem is not the Republicans–but whether Democrats will be tough enough. They have far more political room to force the Republicans to take a difficult vote than they are exercise. A cynic might think that Democrats such as Chris Dodd and Chuck Schumer are more worried about keeping Wall Street and the Fed happy than about maximizing the moment for reform and demonstrating to regular Americans which side they are on. And if President Obama wants to appeal to bipartisanship, here is an area where bipartisanship can actually go hand in hand with good government. One example is the amendment to require an independent audit of the Federal Reserve, which was cosponsored by one of the most progressive Democrats in the House, Alan Grayson of Florida, and the libertarian Republican Ron Paul of Texas. With the support of over 300 House Democrats, that bipartisan provision made it into the final House bill. Another good bipartisan bill was the Fraud Enforcement and Recovery Act, cosponsored by Democratic senators Ted Kaufman of Delaware, Pat Leahy of Vermont, and Republican Chuck Grassley of Iowa, the same Grassley who was part of the obstructions and myth-mongers when it came to health reform. But Grassley and other heartland Republicans are fed up with the double standard that places Wall Street ahead of Main Street. The Act, approved last May, helps–but does not fully restore the right of an injured investor or creditor to sue for damages in cases of securities, including those who aided or abetted a fraud, such as auditors who signed off on cooked books. As Sen. Kaufman said in a recent floor statement , “I’m concerned that the revelations about Lehman Brothers are just the tip of the iceberg. We have no reason to believe that the conduct detailed last week is somehow isolated or unique. Indeed, this sort of behavior is hardly novel. Enron engaged in similar deceit with some of its assets. And while we don’t have the benefit of an examiner’s report for other firms with a business model like Lehman’s, law enforcement authorities should be well on their way in conducting investigations of whether others used similar ‘accounting gimmicks’ to hide dangerous risk from investors and the public.” A good place to start would be to require real audits, similar to the autopsy performed on Lehman Brothers, of all the banks that took taxpayer money under the TARP program. Anyone who thinks that this sort of cooking of books was confined to Lehman Brothers is a good candidate to buy the Brooklyn Bridge–or worse, a bond backed by a sub-prime loan. President Obama could accomplish audit this simply by directing his Treasury Secretary to do it. Obama has at last discovered that the public expects him to lead; and that Republican whining about the perils of majority rule cuts no ice. His administration has now squandered more than a year, being far too soft on the Wall Street system that crashed the rest of the economy. Now, with his own stock risking, he can show his mettle by demanding much tougher financial reform and daring the Republicans to block it. Robert Kuttner is co-editor of The American Prospect and a Senior Fellow at Demos. His new book is A Presidency in Peril (Chelsea Green, April 2010)

Read the full article →

Robert Kuttner: Next, Banking Reform

March 28, 2010

It was a pleasure to see President Obama exercise some leadership and muscle towards health reform, and more recently to pass a true “public option” for student loans. Apparently, the experience of leadership felt good, for the president decided to follow up by deciding to damn the torpedoes and making fifteen recess appointments, including Craig Becker to breathe some life into the National Labor Relations Board. Now, we need to see a similar display of presidential leadership on financial reform. The bill that passed the House last December is far too weak on all of the key issues. Gigantic banking conglomerates will remain “too big to fail.” There is no separation of commercial banking from investment banking or proprietary trading, nor meaningful reform of corrupted credit rating agencies. Regulation of derivatives such as credit default swaps is far too weak. Private equity companies and hedge funds are largely left alone. There is no serious reform of executive compensation. The next generation of bubbles is already incubating while we are still recovering from the damage of the previous one. The Dodd bill that will come before the full Senate later this spring is slightly worse in some respects, slightly better in others. The bill does include a version of Obama’s call to restore the Glass-Steagall wall between commercial and investment banking (the “Volcker Rule”); but where the House bill created an independent consumer financial protection agency, the Dodd bill places this new agency, of all places, in the Federal Reserve. It was the Fed’s total failure to enforce consumer protections on the books that invited the abuses that caused the collapse. The bankruptcy examiner’s revelations in his 2,200 page report about the behavior of Lehman Brothers should cause the White House to rethink its entire approach to financial reform. Basically, Lehman Brothers cooked its books for a few days four times a year, so that its quarterly reports would make the firm look far more solvent than it actually was. It used repurchase agreements (“repos”), which are short term loans, to disguise $30 to 50 billion worth of liabilities. This balance-sheet manipulation began in 2001, according to the examiner, Anton Valukas. This kind of behavior demonstrates the failure of three separate systems that are supposed to protect investors, creditors and the larger economy from willful corporate fraud. First, the Securities and Exchange Commission, which actually had personnel investigating Lehman at the time, and utterly missed what was going on right under the commission’s nose, in a lapse comparable to the Madoff scandal. Second, Lehman’s outside auditors, Ernst and Young, failed to blow the whistle. These abuses mostly occurred after Congress enacted the 2002 Sarbanes-Oxley Act, explicitly to improve corporate auditing in the wake of the Enron fraud. Obviously, though corporate lobbies have been complaining that Sarbanes-Oxley inflicted too much red tape, the Lehman affair demonstrates that it is too weak to do the job. Auditors and executives, in principle anyway, are criminally liable for accounting fraud. But that did not deter Lehman from faking its books and Ernst and Young from going along. According to the examiner’s report, despite the auditor’s acquiescence, Lehman was not able to find a law firm in the US to sign off on its bogus accounting. So Lehman went to the U.K., found a law firm, Linklater’s, to provide an opinion letter under British law okaying the dubious bookkeeping, and then ran the transactions through a London subsidiary. One backstop, that has been weakened in recent years both by Congressional action and by Supreme Court rulings, is the right of investors or creditors injured by fraudulent behavior to sue. The original securities laws of the Roosevelt era envisioned that this kind of litigation–”private right of action”–would keep both corporations, their auditors and the SEC honest. But bipartisan legislation in the 1990s and two major Supreme Court decisions on 1994 and 2008 have effectively eliminated liability for aiding and abetting securities fraud. You can be sure if this right were still available, Ernst and Young would have though twice about giving Lehman a clean bill of health. The politics of financial reform are drastically different from the politics of health care reform. For starters, Wall Street is massively unpopular in the country. By contrast, in the case of health care, some of the bill’s own weaknesses – the mandate, the diversion of Medicare funds, the tax on premiums of high-quality insurance – raised legitimate questions among many voters; Republicans succeed in creating lies about the bill (pulling the plug on Grandma, etc.) that only multiplied concerns. In the end, passing the bill was a genuinely difficult vote for many Democrats. Financial reform is a whole other story. It’s not a difficult vote to tighten restrictions on predator banks (except when it comes to campaign finance). Judging by the recent comments of Senator Bob Corker, one of the senior Republicans on the Senate Banking Committee, Republicans are genuinely worried about finding themselves on the wrong side of a populist issue if they try to block financial reform the same way they tried to block health reform. On financial reform, the real problem is not the Republicans–but whether Democrats will be tough enough. They have far more political room to force the Republicans to take a difficult vote than they are exercise. A cynic might think that Democrats such as Chris Dodd and Chuck Schumer are more worried about keeping Wall Street and the Fed happy than about maximizing the moment for reform and demonstrating to regular Americans which side they are on. And if President Obama wants to appeal to bipartisanship, here is an area where bipartisanship can actually go hand in hand with good government. One example is the amendment to require an independent audit of the Federal Reserve, which was cosponsored by one of the most progressive Democrats in the House, Alan Grayson of Florida, and the libertarian Republican Ron Paul of Texas. With the support of over 300 House Democrats, that bipartisan provision made it into the final House bill. Another good bipartisan bill was the Fraud Enforcement and Recovery Act, cosponsored by Democratic senators Ted Kaufman of Delaware, Pat Leahy of Vermont, and Republican Chuck Grassley of Iowa, the same Grassley who was part of the obstructions and myth-mongers when it came to health reform. But Grassley and other heartland Republicans are fed up with the double standard that places Wall Street ahead of Main Street. The Act, approved last May, helps–but does not fully restore the right of an injured investor or creditor to sue for damages in cases of securities, including those who aided or abetted a fraud, such as auditors who signed off on cooked books. As Sen. Kaufman said in a recent floor statement , “I’m concerned that the revelations about Lehman Brothers are just the tip of the iceberg. We have no reason to believe that the conduct detailed last week is somehow isolated or unique. Indeed, this sort of behavior is hardly novel. Enron engaged in similar deceit with some of its assets. And while we don’t have the benefit of an examiner’s report for other firms with a business model like Lehman’s, law enforcement authorities should be well on their way in conducting investigations of whether others used similar ‘accounting gimmicks’ to hide dangerous risk from investors and the public.” A good place to start would be to require real audits, similar to the autopsy performed on Lehman Brothers, of all the banks that took taxpayer money under the TARP program. Anyone who thinks that this sort of cooking of books was confined to Lehman Brothers is a good candidate to buy the Brooklyn Bridge–or worse, a bond backed by a sub-prime loan. President Obama could accomplish audit this simply by directing his Treasury Secretary to do it. Obama has at last discovered that the public expects him to lead; and that Republican whining about the perils of majority rule cuts no ice. His administration has now squandered more than a year, being far too soft on the Wall Street system that crashed the rest of the economy. Now, with his own stock risking, he can show his mettle by demanding much tougher financial reform and daring the Republicans to block it. Robert Kuttner is co-editor of The American Prospect and a Senior Fellow at Demos. His new book is A Presidency in Peril (Chelsea Green, April 2010)

Read the full article →

Mortgage Modification Program: 12 Million Households ‘At-Risk’

March 28, 2010

Friday’s announcement that the administration is overhauling its mortgage modification program to encourage principal forgiveness shows they understand that unless folks have equity in their homes, mortgage defaults will continue in huge numbers. The plan is a decent one, and it appropriately would have lenders absorb the lion’s share of losses. Still, its an all-carrots approach that may be tough to get off the ground. And taxpayers would get even more deeply involved in housing finance. If it doesn’t work, regulators have a stick to force lenders to take losses, which I describe at the end.

Read the full article →

Mortgage Modification Program: 12 Million Households ‘At-Risk’

March 28, 2010

Friday’s announcement that the administration is overhauling its mortgage modification program to encourage principal forgiveness shows they understand that unless folks have equity in their homes, mortgage defaults will continue in huge numbers. The plan is a decent one, and it appropriately would have lenders absorb the lion’s share of losses. Still, its an all-carrots approach that may be tough to get off the ground. And taxpayers would get even more deeply involved in housing finance. If it doesn’t work, regulators have a stick to force lenders to take losses, which I describe at the end.

Read the full article →

Volvo To China: Ford Sells Swedish Automaker To Zhejiang Geely Holding Group

March 28, 2010

STOCKHOLM — Zhejiang Geely Holding Group signed a binding deal Sunday to buy Ford Motor Co.’s Volvo Cars unit for $1.8 billion, representing a coup for the independent Chinese automaker which is aiming to expand in Europe. The purchase gives Geely a European luxury car brand with a reputation for safety and quality at a time when China, which last year surpassed the U.S. as the world’s largest car market, is eager to improve its competitiveness by acquiring foreign automotive brands that might help it improve its technology and expand into overseas markets. The price, which includes a $200 million note with the remainder to be paid out in cash, is far less than the $6.45 billion Ford paid for the Swedish automaker in 1999. The U.S. automaker has been trying to sell Volvo since late 2008 to focus its resources on managing its core Ford, Lincoln and Mercury brands. “We think it’s a fair price for a good business, and yes, we’re happy with the deal we’ve achieved with Geely,” said Ford Chief Financial Officer Lewis Booth on Sunday at a news conference at Volvo Cars headquarters in Goteborg, on Sweden’s west coast. Booth added that his company believes that, under Geely, “Volvo can continue to build its business and return to profitability.” The agreement was signed by Booth and Geely’s chairman, Li Shufu, and witnessed by Li Yizhong, the Chinese minister of industry and information technology, as well as Swedish Minister for Enterprise and Energy Maud Olofsson. In a statement, Geely said it has secured all the financing necessary to complete the deal, as well as “significant working capital facilities to fund Volvo Cars’ ongoing business.” The sale is expected to be completed in the third quarter, subject to regulatory approvals. The deal also covers further agreements on intellectual property rights, supply, and research and development arrangements between Volvo Cars, Geely and Ford. The U.S. automaker has committed to provide engineering support, information technology, access to tooling for common parts and certain other services for a transition period to smooth the separation. Li, whose comments were translated by an interpreter, described the deal as “a milestone” for both Geely and Volvo, adding that his group will make a Volvo CEO public “in due course.” Geely said it aims to keep Volvo’s existing manufacturing facilities in Sweden and Belgium, but that it also will explore manufacturing opportunities in China. Volvo Cars will remain separate from Geely’s other operations, with its own Sweden-based management team and a new board of directors, the company said. “China, the largest car market in the world, will become Volvo’s second home market. Volvo will be uniquely positioned as a world-leading premium brand, tapping into the opportunities in the fast-growing China market,” Li said. As Western automakers unload unprofitable assets, they are finding keen buyers in Asia. In 2008, Ford sold its Jaguar and Land Rover brands to India’s Tata Motors Ltd. for $1.7 billion, a third of what it paid for them. In addition, General Motors Co. attempted to sell its rugged Hummer brand to a Chinese heavy equipment maker, but is now winding that brand down as the deal collapsed. China’s Beijing Automotive Industry Holdings has also agreed to buy some powertrain technology from GM’s Swedish Saab unit. Geely, an independent automaker that has struggled to upgrade its image in overseas markets, has long coveted a bigger foothold in Europe and has earlier been rumored to be bidding for Opel and Saab. The long-awaited Volvo acquisition is therefore important for the company, which has gradually built its business with little government support. Analyst Zhang Xin, with Guotai Junan Securities in Beijing, said Geely’s pledge to keep Volvo’s factory and business teams in Sweden after the takeover limits its leeway to cut costs. “Reality is always much crueler than what people would wish. Geely wants to build itself as a new ‘international Geely,’ so they sought a strong foreign brand like Volvo,” Zhang said. “Geely should foresee many difficulties. How will it manage to run Volvo well? How will it deal with the factory and employees? How much more will Geely have to spend to operate Volvo?” Volvo, whose first car left its Swedish factory in 1927, employs nearly 20,000 workers, most of them based in Sweden. The group, initially a subsidiary of ballbearing maker SKF, was listed on the stock exchange in 1935. In 2009, it sold 334,808 cars. It currently has 10 models on the global market, with its crossover XC60 being the best-seller. The United States, Sweden and Britain account for its three biggest markets. In a statement Sunday, Volvo Cars CEO Stephen Odell said Volvo managers fully endorse the sale to Geely. “We believe this is the right outcome for the business, and will provide Volvo Cars with the necessary resources, including the capital investment, to strengthen the business and to continue to move it forward in the future,” he said. Volvo dealers in the U.S. said Sunday that Geely’s assurance that the cars will still be made in Sweden has allayed customers’ concerns about quality control. Chinese automakers seeking to expand into U.S. markets have faced quality questions from consumers concerned about defects and problems with a number of Chinese exports ranging from drugs and foods to furniture and appliances. “They do show concern, but we are assuring them the quality of the car is still going to be there,” said Chris Gastmeyer, sales manager at Volvo of Orange County in Santa Ana, California, on Sunday. He said customers are comforted by the fact that the cars are still made in Sweden and that it’s business as usual at this point. Mike Kessler, new car sales manager at Volvo of Santa Monica, said he isn’t seeing much worry from shoppers as it appears the manufacturing will remain the same. But staff are eager to see what changes are in store after the transfer in ownership. “We are dying to see what happens because we need a jump-start,” he said. The sales staff hasn’t received any information yet about the plans of its new owners but Kessler hopes Geely has plans to help build new car sales and leases. “We are basically on hold,” he said. “I’m hoping it gets exciting.” ___ AP Business Writers Elaine Kurtenbach in Shanghai and Sarah Skidmore in Portland, Oregon, contributed to this report.

Read the full article →

Volvo To China: Ford Sells Swedish Automaker To Zhejiang Geely Holding Group

March 28, 2010

STOCKHOLM — Zhejiang Geely Holding Group signed a binding deal Sunday to buy Ford Motor Co.’s Volvo Cars unit for $1.8 billion, representing a coup for the independent Chinese automaker which is aiming to expand in Europe. The purchase gives Geely a European luxury car brand with a reputation for safety and quality at a time when China, which last year surpassed the U.S. as the world’s largest car market, is eager to improve its competitiveness by acquiring foreign automotive brands that might help it improve its technology and expand into overseas markets. The price, which includes a $200 million note with the remainder to be paid out in cash, is far less than the $6.45 billion Ford paid for the Swedish automaker in 1999. The U.S. automaker has been trying to sell Volvo since late 2008 to focus its resources on managing its core Ford, Lincoln and Mercury brands. “We think it’s a fair price for a good business, and yes, we’re happy with the deal we’ve achieved with Geely,” said Ford Chief Financial Officer Lewis Booth on Sunday at a news conference at Volvo Cars headquarters in Goteborg, on Sweden’s west coast. Booth added that his company believes that, under Geely, “Volvo can continue to build its business and return to profitability.” The agreement was signed by Booth and Geely’s chairman, Li Shufu, and witnessed by Li Yizhong, the Chinese minister of industry and information technology, as well as Swedish Minister for Enterprise and Energy Maud Olofsson. In a statement, Geely said it has secured all the financing necessary to complete the deal, as well as “significant working capital facilities to fund Volvo Cars’ ongoing business.” The sale is expected to be completed in the third quarter, subject to regulatory approvals. The deal also covers further agreements on intellectual property rights, supply, and research and development arrangements between Volvo Cars, Geely and Ford. The U.S. automaker has committed to provide engineering support, information technology, access to tooling for common parts and certain other services for a transition period to smooth the separation. Li, whose comments were translated by an interpreter, described the deal as “a milestone” for both Geely and Volvo, adding that his group will make a Volvo CEO public “in due course.” Geely said it aims to keep Volvo’s existing manufacturing facilities in Sweden and Belgium, but that it also will explore manufacturing opportunities in China. Volvo Cars will remain separate from Geely’s other operations, with its own Sweden-based management team and a new board of directors, the company said. “China, the largest car market in the world, will become Volvo’s second home market. Volvo will be uniquely positioned as a world-leading premium brand, tapping into the opportunities in the fast-growing China market,” Li said. As Western automakers unload unprofitable assets, they are finding keen buyers in Asia. In 2008, Ford sold its Jaguar and Land Rover brands to India’s Tata Motors Ltd. for $1.7 billion, a third of what it paid for them. In addition, General Motors Co. attempted to sell its rugged Hummer brand to a Chinese heavy equipment maker, but is now winding that brand down as the deal collapsed. China’s Beijing Automotive Industry Holdings has also agreed to buy some powertrain technology from GM’s Swedish Saab unit. Geely, an independent automaker that has struggled to upgrade its image in overseas markets, has long coveted a bigger foothold in Europe and has earlier been rumored to be bidding for Opel and Saab. The long-awaited Volvo acquisition is therefore important for the company, which has gradually built its business with little government support. Analyst Zhang Xin, with Guotai Junan Securities in Beijing, said Geely’s pledge to keep Volvo’s factory and business teams in Sweden after the takeover limits its leeway to cut costs. “Reality is always much crueler than what people would wish. Geely wants to build itself as a new ‘international Geely,’ so they sought a strong foreign brand like Volvo,” Zhang said. “Geely should foresee many difficulties. How will it manage to run Volvo well? How will it deal with the factory and employees? How much more will Geely have to spend to operate Volvo?” Volvo, whose first car left its Swedish factory in 1927, employs nearly 20,000 workers, most of them based in Sweden. The group, initially a subsidiary of ballbearing maker SKF, was listed on the stock exchange in 1935. In 2009, it sold 334,808 cars. It currently has 10 models on the global market, with its crossover XC60 being the best-seller. The United States, Sweden and Britain account for its three biggest markets. In a statement Sunday, Volvo Cars CEO Stephen Odell said Volvo managers fully endorse the sale to Geely. “We believe this is the right outcome for the business, and will provide Volvo Cars with the necessary resources, including the capital investment, to strengthen the business and to continue to move it forward in the future,” he said. Volvo dealers in the U.S. said Sunday that Geely’s assurance that the cars will still be made in Sweden has allayed customers’ concerns about quality control. Chinese automakers seeking to expand into U.S. markets have faced quality questions from consumers concerned about defects and problems with a number of Chinese exports ranging from drugs and foods to furniture and appliances. “They do show concern, but we are assuring them the quality of the car is still going to be there,” said Chris Gastmeyer, sales manager at Volvo of Orange County in Santa Ana, California, on Sunday. He said customers are comforted by the fact that the cars are still made in Sweden and that it’s business as usual at this point. Mike Kessler, new car sales manager at Volvo of Santa Monica, said he isn’t seeing much worry from shoppers as it appears the manufacturing will remain the same. But staff are eager to see what changes are in store after the transfer in ownership. “We are dying to see what happens because we need a jump-start,” he said. The sales staff hasn’t received any information yet about the plans of its new owners but Kessler hopes Geely has plans to help build new car sales and leases. “We are basically on hold,” he said. “I’m hoping it gets exciting.” ___ AP Business Writers Elaine Kurtenbach in Shanghai and Sarah Skidmore in Portland, Oregon, contributed to this report.

Read the full article →

Tyrannosaurus Rex Ancestors Once Roamed Australia, Bone Discovery Proves

March 28, 2010
Read the full article →

Colombia’s FARC Guerrillas Free Military Hostage, First Release in a Year

March 28, 2010

By Alexander Cuadros March 28 (Bloomberg) — Latin America’s oldest guerrilla group released their first hostage in a year today in a bid to inject themselves into Colombia’s presidential race after an eight-year offensive has pushed them to the country’s margins. The Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia, known as FARC, handed over Corporal Josue Daniel Calvo to Red Cross workers and Brazilian troops, who flew him by helicopter to the city of Villavicencio. The Colombian military suspended operations in the area to facilitate the release and are expected to do so again March 30 to allow for the handover of another hostage, Sergeant Pablo Emilio Moncayo, who was abducted in 1997. Calvo, captured after being shot in the leg during a firefight last April, could be seen crossing the tarmac of the Villavicencio airport with the aid of a walking stick, his family members’ arms hooked through his, in footage carried by Venezuela’s Telesur television network. Opposition Senator Piedad Cordoba , an ally of Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez , accompanied the operation after being granted permission by the government to broker the hostages’ release. The rebels, whose ranks have thinned by half to about 8,000 since 2002, are seeking to draw attention to their 46-year-old insurgency after suffering crippling setbacks in 2008, according to Aldo Civico of Columbia University’s Center for International Conflict Resolution. Car Bombing In the week before today’s release, the government blamed the FARC for setting off a car bomb that killed nine people in the western port city of Buenaventura. In December they kidnapped and killed the governor of southern Caqueta province in a show of strength unseen for years. “The FARC are looking to recover political space,” Civico said in a phone interview. “They’re desperate.” Since taking office in 2002, President Alvaro Uribe , backed by $600 million in annual U.S. anti-narcotics aid, has waged an offensive that has driven the FARC from major highways and reduced one of the world’s highest kidnapping rates by 93 percent to 213 last year. Colombians go to the polls to elect Uribe’s successor on May 30 after a constitutional court barred the popular, investment-friendly leader from seeking a third term. The current frontrunner, former Defense Minister Juan Manuel Santos , engineered some of the rebels’ worst defeats. In July 2008, he oversaw a rescue operation whereby army officers disguised as journalists and aid workers tricked the FARC into handing over its most valuable hostages: three U.S. defense contractors and French-Colombian politician Ingrid Betancourt . Weakened Peso The Colombian peso surged 7.7 percent the week of the rescue. Since then, it’s weakened 11 percent. Santos in March of that year also helped orchestrate a cross-border air raid on a guerrilla camp in Ecuador that killed the FARC’s second-in-command, Raul Reyes . If elected president, the battle-tested Santos may have more leeway than his rivals in pursuing peace talks with the guerrillas, according to Civico. “If Santos wins, he doesn’t have to prove to the country and the international community that he’s a tough guy,” Civico said. “Because of that, he’ll be in a much better position to show a more ecumenical, gentle face.” Santos has said he may reach out to the FARC. “Neither Uribe nor I have completely closed the door on dialogue, but it must be carried out with real foundations and in good faith,” Santos said in a March 17 interview with Barcelona, Spain-based La Vanguardia newspaper. “We’re tired of peace processes that the rebels take advantage of to gain oxygen.” Demilitarized Zone The government in 2002 abolished a demilitarized zone that for more than three years allowed the rebels free rein over a territory the size of Switzerland. Uribe has since pushed them deeper into the jungles of remote border regions. “There’s no chance of defeating the rebels militarily,” said Stephen Donehoo , a former U.S. military intelligence officer and managing director of Washington-based consultancy McLarty Associates. “But they do not present a military threat to the Colombian government anymore.” The FARC may be handing over hostages out of tactical necessity, freeing up their diminished fighting force for purposes other than guarding and caring for prisoners, said Donehoo, who advises multinational companies on doing business in Colombia and other Latin American countries. FARC commander Jorge Briceno in a January statement rejected a call to disarm by the head of Colombia’s armed forces. Kidnappings Reduced The FARC has reduced its dependency on kidnapping in recent years after hundreds of thousands of Colombians organized marches across the country to condemn the practice. Most of its funding today comes from drug-trafficking and extortion, though the estimated 66 prisoners it still holds, including 20 from the ranks of Colombia’s military, remain a powerful bargaining chip. Sergeant Moncayo’s father, Gustavo Moncayo, walked more than 700 miles from his hometown in southwest Colombia with a chain around his neck to bring attention to his son’s plight. “It will be my son who takes these chains off of me,” the schoolteacher said earlier this month. Sergeant Moncayo was taken hostage in December 1997 when the FARC attacked a military base in the southwest of the country. He was an 18-year old conscript at the time. The FARC have said they also plan to hand over the remains of Captain Julian Ernesto Guevara, who died in 2006 after almost eight years in captivity. The FARC’s last release was in March last year when they handed over a Swedish citizen, their last known foreign hostage. The previous month, they freed the ex-Governor of Meta state, Alan Jara, and former lawmaker Sigifredo Lopez. To contact the reporters on this story: Alexander Cuadros in Bogota at acuadros@bloomberg.net

Read the full article →

Obama Visits Afghanistan, Presses Karzai to Root Out Government Corruption

March 28, 2010

By Hans Nichols March 28 (Bloomberg) — President Barack Obama landed in Afghanistan today on an unannounced visit to press for progress from Afghan leaders and get a first-hand look at U.S. progress in the eight-year-old war. While saying he’s “encouraged by the progress that’s been made” in Afghanistan, Obama said after meeting with President Hamid Karzai in Kabul that the Afghan government must do more to root out corruption and improve governance. In a later speech to U.S. troops, Obama said the battle in Afghanistan is “essential” to U.S. security because if the region slides into chaos, al-Qaeda and the Taliban will have a haven from which to attack America. “If I thought for a minute that America’s vital interests were not served I would order you home right away,” Obama told a crowd of soldiers, sailors, Marines and Air Force personnel at Bagram airfield. “You will have the support to get the job done and I am confident that you can get the job done right here.” Obama is in the country as the U.S. role there is growing with an escalation of forces that he ordered, and allied troops are engaged in an offensive against the Taliban in southern Afghanistan. Obama’s visit, his first to Afghanistan since becoming president, is intended to emphasize U.S. calls for the Afghan government to crack down on corruption, fight drug trafficking that helps fund the insurgency and institute merit-based systems for government appointments, according to James Jones , Obama’s national security adviser. U.S. Expectations “We plan to engage President Karzai as we’re going to make him understand that in this second term that there are going to be certain things he has to do as the president of his country that have not been paid attention to almost since day one,” Jones told reporters aboard Air Force One. Obama invited Karzai for talks in Washington in May. “I want to send a strong message that partnership between the United States and Pakistan is going to continue,” Obama said. “We have seen already progress with respect to the military campaign against extremism, but we also want to continue to make progress on the civilian side.” Karzai said he wanted the U.S. partnership to continue “toward a stable, strong, peaceful Afghanistan” and he thanked the U.S. for its help in rebuilding. War Briefing While in Afghanistan, the president also got briefings from the commander he installed last June, General Stanley McChrystal , and Ambassador Karl Eikenberry , said press secretary Robert Gibbs . Landing in darkness at Bagram, Obama travelled the 50 miles to Kabul by helicopter to meet with Karzai at the presidential palace. He had a separate session with Karzai’s cabinet. The trip, kept secret because of security concerns, capped a week in which the president won a major domestic victory with passage of a sweeping overhaul of the U.S. health-care system and announced completion of a nuclear arms reduction treaty with Russia. Obama campaigned for office on a pledge to shift U.S. military resources to Afghanistan from Iraq. A year ago he ordered 17,000 combat troops and 4,000 trainers to the country ahead of Afghanistan’s elections. In December, Obama ordered another 30,000 forces be sent to the country, which ultimately will expand the number of military personnel to 100,000. At the same time he asked North Atlantic Treaty Organization countries to contribute more resources to the conflict. The escalation is intended to reverse Taliban gains and train Afghans to take control of their country so American forces can begin withdrawing in July 2011. U.S. Offensive The U.S. is leading a drive against the Taliban in southern Afghanistan. A 30-day offensive by 15,000 Afghan and NATO troops, including U.S. Marines and British forces, culminated earlier this month with allies taking control of the town of Marjah. It was the biggest operation against the Taliban since the 2001 U.S.-led invasion of Afghanistan following the Sept. 11 attacks by al-Qaeda. Officials have said they are making plans for an even bigger assault on the Taliban heartland city of Kandahar. The increased tempo of the U.S. military campaign has brought higher casualties. In the first two months of the year, 54 U.S. personnel were killed in action in Afghanistan, compared with 27 in the first two months of 2009, according to Defense Department figures . In all, 1,018 U.S. troops have died in Afghanistan, 742 of them as a result of combat. Regional Approach As part of the Obama administration’s strategy, the U.S. also has strengthened its relationship with the government of neighboring Pakistan, whose army has been fighting a rise in terrorism after the Taliban and remnants of al-Qaeda fled Afghanistan and thousands of tribesmen joined their ranks. Jones emphasized the importance of a regional approach to Afghanistan’s stability and said the administration is encouraged by the role Pakistan is playing. In 30 days, Karzai will convene a peace council with Afghan tribal and regional leaders, Lute said. Then in early May he hopes to host a foreign ministers conference in Kabul. The effort has resulted in the capture of some top Taliban leaders in both countries and increased pressure on remnants of al-Qaeda hiding in tribal areas along the border with Pakistan. The U.S. is still deploying the 30,000 additional troops that Obama authorized. The U.S. will have 98,000 troops there by Sept. 30 for a total of almost 150,000 from all 34 countries in the NATO-led coalition that aims to reverse Taliban gains and train Afghan security forces to begin taking over by July 2011. Defense Secretary Robert Gates , testifying to the Senate Appropriations Committee on March 25 said the Afghan army is making “real strides” and that changes are being made to improve training of Afghan police officers. To contact the reporter on this story: Hans Nichols in Afghanistan at Hnichols2@bloomberg.net ;

Read the full article →

Energy Producers, Consumers at Forum Seeking to Moderate Oil-Price Swings

March 28, 2010

By Margot Habiby March 28 (Bloomberg) — Energy producing and consuming countries representing about 90 percent of the world’s supply and demand will seek a “broad agreement” to prevent large oil price swings at a meeting beginning this week in Mexico. “There is great acknowledgement, more now than there ever was, that this kind of volatility is not good for producers or consumers,” Noe van Hulst , secretary-general of the Riyadh- based International Energy Forum, said today in an interview in Cancun, Mexico. He cited price fluctuations in 2008, when oil traded between $32.40 a barrel and a record $147.27 a barrel. Saudi Arabian Oil Minister Ali al-Naimi and U.S. Deputy Energy Secretary Daniel Poneman , representing the world’s biggest oil exporter and the largest consumer, will join ministers from more than 60 other countries at the Cancun meeting, which begins tomorrow and runs through March 31. Producers and consumers, working together, can curb volatility through increased transparency, Van Hulst said. Potential measures could include better oil supply and demand data from developing nations outside the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, he said. Non-OECD countries such as China and India are forecast to fuel energy-demand growth after the global economic recession. “Producers and consumers need to cooperate” and conduct a “frank and open dialog about everything that affects the market,” Van Hulst said. Crude oil for May delivery dropped 53 cents, or 0.7 percent, to settle at $80 a barrel on the New York Mercantile Exchange on March 26. Futures have increased 47 percent from a year earlier. The May contract declined 1.2 percent this week. To contact the reporter on this story: Margot Habiby in Cancun, Mexico at mhabiby@bloomberg.net .

Read the full article →

PetroChina Plans $60 Billion in Energy Acquisitions Abroad, Chairman Says

March 28, 2010

By Bloomberg News March 29 (Bloomberg) — PetroChina Co. will spend at least $60 billion in the next decade on overseas acquisitions to power the world’s fastest-growing major economy, challenging Exxon Mobil Corp. and BP Plc in the race to control oil and gas fields. “Ten years ago, PetroChina was a state-owned oil company, but now we have a goal of becoming an international, integrated energy company,” Jiang Jiemin, chairman of the world’s largest company by market value, said in a March 25 interview, where he announced the investment plan. Beijing-based PetroChina spent almost $7 billion in the last year to buy refineries and reserves in Australia, Canada, Singapore and Central Asia. The expansion pits PetroChina against Irving, Texas-based Exxon, which agreed to pay about $30 billion for U.S. gas producer XTO Energy Inc. in December. “Every five, 10 years or so, you’ll get the occasional $30 billion deal, but this is at least $6 billion every year and that’s significant for any major oil company,” said Neil Beveridge , an analyst at Sanford C. Bernstein Ltd. in Hong Kong. “This puts PetroChina on par or exceeding some international oil majors in spending.” Exxon is counting on gas to provide the bulk of its future growth with the acquisition of XTO Energy as well as new developments from the South Pacific to the Celtic Sea. BP, vying with Royal Dutch Shell Plc as Europe’s biggest oil company, paid at least $8.3 billion to acquire assets over the past 12 months. Spending by Chinese companies on mining and energy acquisitions reached a record $32 billion last year. PetroChina spent between $2 billion and $3 billion annually in the past five years, so the planned investment “is clearly a step up,” Beveridge said. Arrow Purchase Petrochina shares fell for a fifth day in Hong Kong on March 26 following the $3.2 billion purchase of Arrow Energy Ltd. last week. The Brisbane-based company extracts gas locked in coal formations. The decline highlighted concerns about potentially low returns. Investors want to see PetroChina acquire oil and gas resources that are plentiful and cheap to extract, Beveridge said. “Investors want to see growth at the company, but there may be concern growth is put above high returns,” he said. Longer-term investors are betting on PetroChina’s success, driving the shares up 40 percent in the last 12 months. That beat the 38 percent gain in BP and well outperformed the 3.1 percent decline in Exxon. The Arrow deal would help PetroChina develop the country’s coal-bed methane reserves that may be as much as 38 trillion cubic meters, said Jiang, 54. The Chinese company plans to boost its annual output capacity of the fuel to 4 billion cubic meters within five years, Jiang said. That could be 20 percent of China’s coal-bed methane output by 2015, which may reach 20 billion cubic meters by then, according to Sun Maoyuan, chairman of China United Coalbed Methane Co., a unit of China National Coal Group Corp., Nov. 2. Overseas Target PetroChina wants half its oil and gas to come from abroad by 2020, Jiang said in Hong Kong. The company, more than 80 percent owned by the state, currently gets less than a tenth of its production from overseas . The energy explorer and refiner plans to produce 400 million metric tons of oil and gas a year by 2020, Jiang said, without stating which countries are favored for investment. Purchases will be largely funded by the company’s cash flow and earnings, he said. “We aren’t going to operate in every oil-producing country,” said Jiang, who was elected as chairman in May 2007. “It’s not the more you eat, the better. You will suffer from indigestion if you eat too much.” Political Risk Politics is the biggest risk PetroChina faces in its expansion, Jiang said, without elaborating. Domestic rival Cnooc Ltd. dropped an $18.5 billion offer for El Segundo, California-based Unocal Corp. in 2005, the biggest overseas acquisition attempted by a Chinese company at the time. The offer met resistance from U.S. lawmakers on grounds the takeover would threaten national security. Cnooc hadn’t sought a majority stake in any overseas deal until this year when it agreed to buy half of Argentina’s second-largest oil producer Bridas Corp. for $3.1 billion. “Tell those who care about PetroChina, PetroChina will never ever be a threat to anybody,” said Jiang, previously a vice governor of Qinghai province in China’s far west. Russian Gas China wants to triple the use of gas to about 10 percent of energy consumption by 2020 to reduce use of coal. The country plans to import 68 billion cubic meters of the cleaner-burning fuel a year from Russia through two pipelines, Jiang said. That’s about 80 percent of China’s gas production last year. PetroChina’s parent, China Nationals Petroleum Corp., has been in talks with Russia on gas imports for more than a decade and has made “good progress” over the past two years with an initial pricing agreement signed at the end of 2009, Jiang said. The company will focus on its oil and gas business and won’t invest in renewable energy including wind and solar for now, Jiang said. “PetroChina is definitely among the key players globally now in the hunt for resources overseas,” Beveridge said. “It’s increasingly apparent that the international oil majors can no longer call all the shots.” — John Duce and Wang Ying in Hong Kong. Editors: Ryan Woo , Peter Langan . To contact the reporter on this story: Wang Ying in Hong Kong at ywang30@bloomberg.net ; John Duce in Hong Kong at Jduce1@bloomberg.net

Read the full article →

Greece’s Papandreou Faces $21 Billion Bond Burden After Winning EU Support

March 28, 2010

By John Fraher and Simon Kennedy March 29 (Bloomberg) — Greek Prime Minister George Papandreou , fresh from winning a European Union aid package last week, now has to prove he can keep his nation’s finances afloat. His government still has to raise as much as 15.5 billion euros ($21 billion) by the end of May, almost as much debt as it sold in the first quarter, says Petros Christodoulou , head of the country’s debt agency. Failure to do so could spark a new round of the fiscal crisis and trigger the use of the aid plan crafted by EU leaders in Brussels on March 25. The EU and International Monetary Fund pledge to help Greece finance the region’s biggest budget deficit should it run out of options in capital markets helped lift the euro from a 10-month low against the dollar and drove stocks higher around the world. Papandreou must now decide whether to wait and see if Greek bond yields decline further or try to raise cash right away to replenish the government’s coffers. “Greece still needs to raise a big amount money, and there is no guarantee that they can do it cheaply,” said Robin Marshall , director of fixed income in London at Smith & Williamson Investment Management, which oversees about $20 billion. “There’s still a lot of uncertainty, and we don’t know whether this mechanism that is being put in place works until it’s tested.” Papandreou told reporters March 26 that Greece will “find the opportune time to go out on the market.” The aid mechanism removes the risk of Greece failing to repay bond investors and “should tighten the spreads materially,” Christodoulou said in an e-mailed response to questions the same day. He declined to comment after the Financial Times quoted him March 27 saying the country would “like to return to the market within March.” Unsustainably High Papandreou demanded financial aid from the EU to help Greece reduce its borrowing costs , which he says are unsustainably high. Even after the bailout pledge, the yield on Greek 10-year bonds ended last week at 6.19 percent, still 3.04 percentage points above the rate on comparable German securities, the European benchmark. The gap was 2.39 percentage points at the start of this year and as high as 3.96 percentage points in January. Euro-area countries would grant more than half the loans and the IMF would provide the rest in the deal struck last week. Papandreou says he never expects to seek assistance. Its “counterproductive” to speculate about the scenarios, including developments on spreads, that would spur an aid request under the new facility, he said. Cost for EU Goldman Sachs Group Inc. Chief European Economist Erik Nielsen estimates Greece will ultimately need an 18-month package of as much as 25 billion euros with the IMF providing about 10 billion euros of that. French Finance Minister Christine Lagarde said March 27 in Cernobbio, Italy, that the EU’s strategy shows the “determination” of policy makers to “keep the euro stable.” Her German counterpart, Wolfgang Schaeuble, said in a Welt Online interview the same day that EU countries seeking IMF help must remain an exception and in the longer term “Europe must be able to solve” fiscal problems by itself. Greece faces about 12 billion euros of debt repayments in April, with 8.2 billion euros of five-year bonds and about 3.9 billion euros of bills maturing that month. It must repay 8.5 billion euros of 10-year bonds in May. While those are the only bond maturities Greece faces this year, the country needs an average of almost 2 billion euros a month to cover the budget deficit and interest payments on existing debt, its deficit reduction plan shows. The government aims to cut its shortfall by four percentage points in 2010 from last year’s 12.7 percent of gross domestic product, before satisfying the EU’s 3 percent limit by 2012. “The announcement of the bailout mechanism for Greece should end the immediate liquidity and therefore default risk for Greece,” Laurence Mutkin , head of European fixed-income strategy in London at Morgan Stanley, wrote in a report to clients. “However, we think that the longer term trajectory for Greece remains uncertain.” To contact the reporters on this story: John Fraher in London at jfraher@bloomberg.net Simon Kennedy in Paris at skennedy4@bloomberg.net

Read the full article →

China Construction Bank Net Income More Than Doubles After Lending Surges

March 28, 2010

By Bloomberg News March 29 (Bloomberg) — China Construction Bank Corp. , the nation’s second-largest lender, more than doubled profit in the fourth quarter as bad loans declined and lending surged amid a recovery in the world’s fastest-growing major economy. Net income climbed to 20.7 billion yuan ($3.03 billion) from 8.37 billion yuan in the fourth quarter of 2008, based on figures released by the Beijing-based company yesterday. China’s economic growth accelerated to 10.7 percent in the fourth quarter and property prices climbed the most in almost two years last month, buoyed by record lending. Construction Bank, established in 1954 to fund roads, railways, bridges and dams, poured money into projects around the nation after the government unleashed a $585 billion stimulus package. “Last year’s lending growth was phenomenal, but it also left us with a lot of side effects,” said Fu Lichun , a Beijing- based analyst at Southwest Securities Co. “Asset quality is the biggest risk lying ahead. China Construction Bank may do better than peers because it was more selective in choosing projects last year.” Non-performing loans at the bank fell to 72.2 billion yuan as of Dec. 31, down from 83.9 billion yuan a year ago, according to yesterday’s statement. The state-controlled lender extended 1 trillion yuan of new credit last year, double the figure in 2008, taking its total outstanding loans at the end of the year to 4.69 trillion yuan. Curb Lending Construction Bank, the nation’s biggest personal mortgage provider, and rivals said this month they will control the amount and pace of lending after Premier Wen Jiabao warned of “latent risk” in China’s banks. The amount of new credit they extended last year doubled to a record 9.59 trillion yuan. The lender will “continue to reinforce infrastructure, strengthen risk management and internal controls, reasonably control loan growth with an estimated RMB loan increase of about 17 percent,” Construction Bank said yesterday, referring to the shortened name of the renminbi, another term for the Chinese currency. Construction Bank’s Hong Kong-listed shares have dropped 8.7 percent this year on concern the government will tighten monetary policy and banks will sell additional shares to improve their financial strength after their lending spree. The benchmark Hang Seng Index has lost 3.7 percent so far in 2010. Larger rival Industrial & Commercial Bank of China Ltd. said on March 25 it will sell as much as 25 billion yuan of convertible bonds and issue up to 20 percent of equity capital in Hong Kong too boost capital. It posted its fastest profit growth in seven quarters, with a 58 percent jump in net income to 28.6 billion yuan. No Fund-Raising Bank of China Ltd. last week won shareholder approval to sell as much as 40 billion yuan of convertible bonds. Construction Bank Chairman Guo Shuqing said last month he has no plans to raise funds this year. China’s banking regulator told lenders to limit new lending to a combined total of 7.5 trillion yuan this year, 22 percent lower than last year’s record. The People’s Bank of China has raised the amount that banks must set aside as reserves twice this year to curb their credit growth. Fourth-quarter profit at Construction Bank was derived by subtracting nine-month profit from 2009 earnings reported yesterday. The company posted a 15.3 percent increase in net income in 2009 to 106.8 billion yuan, according to the statement. Construction Bank set aside 25.5 billion yuan in provisions against bad debts during the year, compared with 50.8 billion yuan in 2008. Its provision coverage ratio increased to 176 percent of non-performing loans , compared with 132 percent the previous year and higher than the 150 percent regulatory requirement, according to the statement. Loan Profitability Net interest income, or revenue from borrowers minus interest paid to depositors, dropped 5.8 percent to 212 billion yuan from 225 billion yuan last year. Net interest margin, a measure of loan profitability, narrowed to 2.41 percent in 2009 from 3.24 percent a year earlier, according to the statement. Construction Bank’s net fees and commission from services such as credit cards, custodian services and mutual fund sales, rose 25 percent to 48 billion yuan. — Luo Jun in Beijing and Debra Mao in Hong Kong. Editors: Brett Miller , Nerys Avery To contact Bloomberg News staff of this story: Luo Jun in Shanghai at +8621-6104-7021 or jluo6@bloomberg.net

Read the full article →

Junk Bonds Set Monthly Record in `Goldilocks’ Environment: Credit Markets

March 28, 2010

By Bryan Keogh and John Detrixhe March 29 (Bloomberg) — Junk bond sales reached a record this month as rising profits and record low Federal Reserve interest rates foster lending and investment to the lowest-rated borrowers. Companies worldwide issued $38.3 billion of junk bonds this month, passing the previous high of $36 billion in November 2006, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. Yields fell 0.95 percentage point this month to within 5.96 percentage points of government debt, the narrowest gap since January 2008, Bank of America Merrill Lynch index data show. This is “an almost ‘Goldilocks’ environment for leveraged credit markets,” JPMorgan Chase & Co. analysts led by Peter Acciavatti , the top-ranked high-yield strategist in Institutional Investor magazine’s annual survey for the past seven years, said in a March 26 report to the bank’s clients. Sales soared as investors plowed a record $33.6 billion into speculative-grade funds this quarter, according to Cambridge, Massachusetts-based research firm EPFR Global. Bonds of Stamford, Connecticut-based Frontier Communications Corp. and Consol Energy Inc. of Pittsburgh, which sold a combined $5.95 billion of debt last week, rose about 2 cents on the dollar to 102 cents. By comparison, companies pulled bond sales in February at the fastest pace since credit markets began to freeze in 2007 on concern that the inability of European governments to trim their budget deficits will threaten a global recovery. Loan Revival About $20 billion of high-yield, or leveraged, loans have been completed in February and March, compared with $38 billion for all of 2009, according to New York-based JPMorgan. Elsewhere in credit markets, yield spreads for company bonds shrank by an average 3 basis points last week to 151 basis points, or 1.51 percentage points, the narrowest since November 2007, according to Bank of America Merrill Lynch’s Global Broad Market Corporate Index. Yields rose to 4.02 percent from 3.98 percent. AmeriCredit Corp. will sell $200 million of bonds tied to loans in its first asset-backed offering since the end of a U.S. program to revive that market, OAO Russian Railways sold $1.5 billion of debt in its debut foreign bond issue, and Caixa Economica Federal , a government-controlled lender, plans to be the first Brazilian bank to sell local debt with a maturity of at least two years after the nation’s central bank opened up the market for such sales. Subprime Auto Debt Fort Worth, Texas-based AmeriCredit, a lender to auto buyers with poor credit, last issued similar debt in February through the Federal Reserve’s Term Asset-Backed Securities Loan Facility, which attracted investors by financing purchases of the securities. The TALF program ended earlier this month. OAO Russian Railways’s foreign bonds were sold at a lower yield than OAO Gazprom’s similar-maturity debt on speculation the notes will be included in benchmark bond indexes, making them more attractive to investors. The seven-year bonds were priced to yield 5.739 percent on March 26, according to a banker with knowledge of the transaction. That compares with a yield of 6.065 percent on Gazprom’s dollar bonds due 2018, according to Bloomberg prices. Caixa Economica , a Brasilia-based bank founded in 1861, may sell about 50 million reais ($27.5 million) of bonds called “letras financeiras” in May, Marcio Percival Alves Pinto , the bank’s vice-president of finance, said in a telephone interview. The cost to protect against defaults on U.S. corporate bonds fell, trading in a benchmark credit derivatives index shows. Default Swaps Credit-default swaps on the Markit CDX North America Investment Grade Index Series 14, which investors use to speculate on creditworthiness or to hedge against losses, declined 0.7 basis point to 87.25 basis points on March 26, according to CMA DataVision. For the week, the index rose 0.6 basis point. In London, the Markit iTraxx Europe Index, linked to credit-default swaps on 125 investment-grade companies, rose 0.88 basis point to a mid-price of 78.6, Markit composite prices show. Credit-default swaps tied to Greek government bonds fell 13.8 basis points to 295.5 on March 26, according to CMA, as leaders of the 16-nation euro region agreed to a potential bailout for Europe’s most indebted country. Default swaps on Greece soared to as high as 428 basis points on Feb. 4 on speculation the nation’s debt woes may spread to its southern European neighbors. Global Sales Credit swaps pay the buyer face value if a borrower defaults in exchange for the underlying securities or the cash equivalent. A basis point is 0.01 percentage point and equals $1,000 annually on a contract protecting $10 million of debt for five years. A decrease indicates improvement in the perception of credit quality; an increase, the opposite. Global corporate bond sales rose to $273 billion this month, up from $162 billion in February, Bloomberg data show. That compares with the monthly average of $265 billion in 2009, when sales for the year soared to a record $3.2 trillion. Companies raised $722 billion through bond issues this year, compared with $1 trillion in the first quarter of 2009. Returns for the month total 0.3 percent, and 2.52 percent for the year, according to according to Bank of America Merrill Lynch’s Global Broad Market Corporate Index. U.S. junk bonds have done better, gaining 2.94 percent this month and 4.64 percent for the year. JPMorgan’s Acciavatti said spreads may narrow another 85 basis points by year-end. Speculative-grade bonds are rated below Baa3 by Moody’s Investors Service and BBB- by Standard & Poor’s. Sales Double “Appetite is definitely there” for junk bonds, said Joel Levington , director of corporate credit for Brookfield Investment Management Inc. in New York, which has $24 billion in assets under management. Sales of high-yield bonds in March are more than double last month’s total of $16 billion, driving issuance this year to $78.5 billion, on pace for the busiest quarter on record, Bloomberg data show. High-yield companies, taking advantage of the lower borrowing costs, said they planned to repay debt with proceeds from at least $20 billion of this month’s bond sales. “The mindset of investors is that this spread product is ideally situated for this kind of macro environment,” said Charles Himmelberg , the chief credit strategist at Goldman Sachs Group Inc. in New York. Rising profits The fastest pace of economic growth in six years during the final three months of 2009 fueled a surge in corporate profits that may set the stage for job gains and a broadening of the U.S. recovery. Company earnings increased 8 percent in the fourth quarter, capping the biggest year-over-year gain in 25 years, the Commerce Department said on March 26. While economists expect the global economy to expand 3.6 percent this year, Fed Chairman Ben S. Bernanke told lawmakers March 25 that U.S. interest rates will likely remain low for some time to give the recovery time to become entrenched. Frontier’s four-part, $3.2 billion offering on March 26 was the largest sale of high-yield U.S. corporate bonds since May, when Teck Resources Ltd., a Vancouver-based metals producer, issued $4.23 billion of senior secured notes, Bloomberg data show. The telephone company’s five-year notes were bid at 102.25 cents on the dollar on their first day of trading, according to brokerage RW Pressprich & Co. The seven-year debt traded at a mid-price of 102 cents, the 10-year bonds were bid at 101.5 cents and the 12-year debt was bid at 101 cents. All the securities were issued at par, Bloomberg data show. Consol, Matalan Consol, the coal and natural gas producer, sold $2.75 billion of notes on March 24 in its largest bond and its first in eight years, Bloomberg data show. Consol, which split the offering between $1.5 billion of 8 percent notes due 2017 and $1.25 billion of 8.25 percent bonds maturing in 2020, plans to use the proceeds for an acquisition. On March 26, the 2017 notes traded at 102.375 and the 2020 notes reached 102.625, according to S&P LCD. Both were issued at par. The S&P/LSTA US Leveraged Loan 100 Index rose 0.34 cent last week to 90.84 cents on the dollar, the sixth straight weekly gain and putting the index at its highest level since June 30, 2008. Average loan rates, which are about 5.41 percentage points more than the London interbank offered rate, may narrow to 4.25 points more than Libor by year-end, Acciavatti said. Loans of U.K. budget clothing retailer Matalan Ltd., which sold 225 million pounds ($335 million) of high-yield bonds on March 24, rose in their first day of trading last week. The loans climbed to 100.5 percent of face value, from 99 percent, according to prices provided by Mizuho Financial Group Inc. and London-based credit broker Guy Butler Ltd. At least 17 borrowers postponed or withdrew $7.7 billion of debt sales through mid-February, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. That’s the most since more than 50 were canceled in the months after financial markets began to freeze in July 2007. To contact the reporters on this story: Bryan Keogh in London at bkeogh4@bloomberg.net ; John Detrixhe in New York at jdetrixhe1@bloomberg.net

Read the full article →

David Bolchover: Why High Pay is Bad for Capitalism

March 28, 2010

Too often, capitalism’s strongest supporters defend high executive pay, especially in the finance sector, in the belief that they are upholding the principles of the free market. This is a grave mistake. The market for pay has been distorted by self-interest, and the capitalist system they hold dear is suffering as a consequence. Since the 2008 financial crisis, much attention has focussed on how to ensure that large bonuses do not encourage employees to take excessive risks with investors’ money. But there is another, more deeply entrenched problem — one that has passed without serious challenge, but may pose an even greater long-term danger to capitalism. That is the abuse of the term “talent” when describing senior corporate executives or finance sector employees. These people, we are told, possess such rare commercial talent that they can rightfully lay claim to fabulous wealth. This view persists despite the absence of any reasonable method of measuring individual performance, let alone attributing a company’s financial success to it. The myth of rare talent is propagated and relentlessly championed not just by the high earners themselves, but also by many others who stand to gain from it — their headhunters, business schools and management consultancies that sell their services to company chiefs, and the senior employees of institutional shareholders who benefit financially from the exact same myth. Those who promote the “talent” argument repeatedly evoke an erroneous comparison with sports stars. Many people may object to the high earnings of the latter on moral grounds, but it is certainly rational to pay for sporting prowess that is highly transparent, and close to irreplaceable. Only a handful among the billions on the planet could emulate the skills and impact of Alex Rodriguez or Lionel Messi. By contrast, the success of a company may have little or nothing to do with the alleged abilities of its most prominent employees. Benign economic conditions, a powerful and long-established brand, a lack of industry competition, smart middle managers, or just plain luck, to name but a few factors, may have had a greater influence on corporate success. It is especially difficult to pinpoint executive influence in firms that employ tens of thousands of staff worldwide. Even if the impact of senior corporate executives was indeed measurable, what precisely is it that they do that a significant number of other diplomatic, articulate, persuasive, insightful, credible, energetic people with related experience couldn’t also do, given the right mentoring? Not everyone has what it takes, of course, but surely enough do to create sufficient competition for those top jobs. Or are we really to believe that the only people with commercial talent are the tall, white, middle-aged men who dominate Western boardrooms? Similarly, the supposed rare talents of super-rich employee bankers have not been adequately explained. An ability to sell, while reasonably uncommon, is hardly limited to a tiny proportion, especially as it is a skill that can be transferred across sectors, once supplemented with some product training. Some bankers have undoubtedly mastered complex financial products. But aren’t there sufficient numbers of university graduates in esoteric subjects to suggest that many more people are capable of mastering complexity? The truth is that the “talent” referred to in the workplace does not generally describe a rare ability, as it does in sport. Rather, it is duplicitously deployed to defend the positions and wealth of high-fliers in a knowledge-based economy, where the value of individual contribution is so subjective. In doing so, it serves to sanction the unwarranted plunder of shareholder funds. In the modern world, those shareholder funds mostly belong to the population at large, through their pensions and savings. Opinion polls reveal that while American people have no problem with entrepreneurs becoming extremely wealthy, they smell a giant rat in the form of high corporate pay. The growing realisation that a small club of insiders has stolen the system from them has created a widespread popular resentment, making democratic governments more prone to heavy-handed measures that stunt growth. The brazen appropriation of wealth also discredits the entire system of free enterprise. There are other damaging consequences of the talent myth. Excessive pay at the top of our public companies distorts the incentives for smart, hardworking people away from entrepreneurship, with all the creative energy and innovation it unleashes, and towards a life of office politics and ladder-climbing, working in jobs that many others could also do. Of course, not everyone weighs up whether to work in a large company or go it alone. It would be hard to imagine the likes of Bill Gates or Steve Jobs patiently making their way up a company hierarchy; likewise, many people will always prefer the relative security of a decent salary. But there also exists a substantial group of people who, while not natural risk-takers, are nevertheless driven to succeed, and dream of the independence that wealth brings. For them, the choice is clear. On the one hand, they can find a gap in a competitive market, raise start-up capital (perhaps mortgaging the family home), hire staff and crack the bureaucracy, all the while knowing that their business might well fail. On the other hand, they can play the corporate game, earning enough for a comfortable lifestyle on the way up, with a massive risk-free pot of gold on offer if they reach the top. The former course may seem more romantic, but the latter is difficult to resist. Extremely high pay, often perceived as a symbol of capitalist success, is in reality a major impediment to its success. The talent myth that sustains such excess must be confronted. David Bolchover ( www.davidbolchover.com ) is the author of “Pay Check: Are Top Earners Really Worth It?” (Coptic Publishing).

Read the full article →

States May Tax Services To Address Budget Shortfalls

March 28, 2010

In the scramble to find something, anything, to generate more revenue, states are considering new taxes on virtually everything: garbage pickup, dating services, bowling night, haircuts, even clowns.

Read the full article →

Dan Dorfman: Why Stock Sizzle Won’t Fizzle

March 28, 2010

“They ought to move the New York Stock Exchange from Wall Street to Cape Canaveral,” Los Angeles money manager Arnold Silver quipped the other day. Why so? “Because this market looks like it’s moon-bound,” he says. A flamboyant comment, of course, but not to Silver, a former day trader who runs his own firm, A. Silver Associates, and says the only question now, given the market’s sharply rising momentum, is how high is up. His view: The Dow (currently at 10,850), could reach 12,000 before the end of June as more and more investors shed their timidity and come out of the foxhole. In fact, Silver, a former bear who has swung into the bullish camp, thinks positive job hiring numbers for a couple of months — which he expects soon — could spur a stock buying frenzy. And that, he believes, could lead to an all-time high in the index (above its October 2007 peak of 14,164) before year end. For some thoughts on Silver’s “moon-bound” view, I rang up one of the investment community’s more incisive and analytical minds, Bill Rhodes, a former market strategist at Merrill Lynch. Methodical, scientific and exacting and presently skipper of Boston-based Rhodes Analytics, Rhodes is paid big bucks for doling out investment advice to major institutional investors, such as pension funds, mutual funds and hedge funds. Rhodes also boasts a snazzy record of catching up and down market movements. One of his more impressive calls came on March 22, 2009, when the S&P 500 was trading at 768. At the time, he told clients that an unusual flood of liquidity from the Fed and the Treasury signaled the likelihood of much higher equity prices. With the index more than 50% higher now at 1,166, it turned out to a super money-making call for any clients wise enough to heed his words. A former classical pianist, Rhodes tells me as he looks at his indicators and models — which show the market to be awesome — “it’s hard to say this market is not going to go higher or quarrel with that moon-bound comment.” Spelling out why he’s so gung-ho, Rhodes points to the following: –We’re in the early phase of an economic expansion. –Corporate profits are up 30% on a year-over-year basis. –The trend in retail sales is pretty good. –Initial jobless claims have retreated 30% year-over-year. –Year-over-year, the housing market is not as bad as it had been, with new home sales down 13%, versus a much heftier 39% year-over-year decline as of last March, and existing home sales are up about 43%. –Domestic non-financial and non-federal debt, year-over-year, is shrinking for the first time in 60 years, versus government debt, which is going through the roof. In addition, Rhodes notes the breadth of the market (advancing stocks, versus declining stocks) is tremendous, volatility is going down, spreads on stock prices between bids and asked are narrowing, and volume is picking up. “Based on what’s going on now, I think you can go into the market, buy and realize positive returns,” he says. Rhodes wouldn’t discuss individual stocks, but he did identify the sectors that show up strongest in his work. They are consumer discretionary, financials and export-oriented industrials, all of which are beneficiaries of an economy in the early stages of expansion. On a cautionary note, Rhodes expresses concern that the money stuffed into the financial system by central banks and finance ministers to keep it from going down is now being withdrawn. In the U.S., for example, he takes note of the shutting down of such government-support programs as commercial paper facilities and temporary liquidity swap arrangements. Since liquidity is being drained globally, he says, and the thing to do is to keep an eye on it because if something goes wrong, that’s where its going to happen. Another of his concerns is that debt is growing /by leaps and bounds worldwide and Moody’s, he points out, is even saying it may have to downgrade U.K. and U.S. debt. There’s an old Marine saying, No guts, no glory. Rhodes never said it in so many words, but his investment message is clear: Now is the time to realize more stock market glory if you’ve got the guts to play. He may be right, but it’s noteworthy to me that in the past two trading sessions (Thursday and Friday) the market racked up some impressive gains in early trading, only to see them substantially pared later in the day amid waves of brisk profit-taking. What does it mean? That the risks are far from over and bulls can also be gored. You may be one of them. What do you think? E-mail me at Dandordan@aol.com.

Read the full article →

What You Need To Know About Obama’s New Mortgage Aid Plan

March 28, 2010

WASHINGTON – The Obama administration on Friday announced a major reworking of its troubled $75 billion plan to prevent foreclosures. The revamped program is now designed to aid jobless homeowners and people who owe more on their mortgages than their homes are worth. Here’s a look at the details: Q. How many homeowners will this help? A. The effort is designed to enable the government to reach its original goal of helping 3 million to 4 million homeowners avoid foreclosure by the end of 2012. That benchmark has so far proved impossible to approach. Only 170,000 homeowners have completed loan modifications, out of 1.1 million who began the government’s Home Affordable Modification Program since it started last year. Q. How many borrowers are in trouble? A. About 6 million homeowners have missed at least two months of payments. And experts warn that 10 million to 12 million borrowers are in danger of foreclosure over the next three years. A growing risk is among homeowners who are “under water”: They owe more on their loans than their homes are worth. Q. How does the new plan work? A. Borrowers will get help in three ways: Jobless homeowners can get a three-to-six-month break on their mortgage payments. Banks will get financial incentives to reduce mortgage balances for under-water borrowers. And lenders can offer refinanced loans backed by the Federal Housing Administration to these borrowers. Q. When will all these programs be available? A. Government officials didn’t specify but said they should become available in the coming months. Q. I’m unemployed. How do I get help? A. That piece of the program is designed to give homeowners more time to find a job. Borrowers will have three to six months in which they’ll have to spend no more than 31 percent of their monthly income on their mortgages. If you do find a job during that time, you will be evaluated for a loan modification that could permanently reduce your payments. To qualify, you need to live in your home, have a mortgage of below $729,750 and receive unemployment benefits. Q. What happens if I don’t get a job after the time is up? A. Lenders will encourage you to consider a short sale, in which you sell your home for less than the mortgage amount. Another option is a deed-in-lieu of foreclosure, in which you agree to hand back the property to your lender. Q. I owe more on my mortgage than my house is worth. Will this help me? A. Maybe. The program depends on the willingness of mortgage companies to participate. Their track record has been shaky at best. Q. How does it work? A. Mortgage companies that already participate in the government’s foreclosure prevention program will have to consider reducing the mortgage amount for borrowers who owe at least 15 percent more than their home’s current value. Those reductions will happen gradually over three years and apply only if you miss no payments. Those companies will receive expanded incentives to do so. Q. What kind of incentives? A. For every dollar of principal the lender reduces, they will receive a subsidy of 10 to 21 cents. The larger subsidies will help reduce principal of borrowers who are less under water. Q. How do I qualify? A: You must have a mortgage of less than $729,750. You also must show that you are in financial trouble. And you have to be spending at least 31 percent of your pretax income on your mortgage payment. Q. So how do I apply? A. Call the company that sends your mortgage bill, also known as your mortgage servicer, to see if you qualify. If you can’t get hold of someone, try a nonprofit housing counselor. NeighborWorks America runs a national network of foreclosure counseling agencies. Try: http://www.findaforeclosurecounselor.org/ Q. How does the refinancing program work? A. Some borrowers will be able to refinance into loans backed by the Federal Housing Administration, which insures loans against default. The FHA will get $14 billion in incentive money from the federal bailout fund to make this happen. Lenders will have to reduce the homeowners’ primary mortgages by at least 10 percent. Q. How do I qualify? A. Homeowners must not have missed any payments on their home loans, must live in their home as a primary residence and must provide proof of income. Q. How do I apply for the FHA plan? A. You don’t. It’s voluntary for mortgage companies. They’ll evaluate whether they want to offer this option to homeowners.

Read the full article →

Richard Zombeck: ShameTheBanks.org Gaining Momentum

March 28, 2010

Since www.shamethebanks.org was launched on March 23 and announced on the Huff Post, the site has received thousands of visitors. Homeowners have been submitting stories , commenting on articles and stories, and downloading hundreds of mortgage related documents that are available on the site. The content on the site has received over 13,000 hits and continues to gain momentum. In the site’s short time on the web it’s been featured on moveyourmoney.info , with the tag line, “Want to tell people how you were abused by the big banks? Share your story at ShametheBanks.org , where you can read other horror stories and stay up to date on how government policies affect you.” Denise Richardson, consumer advocate and owner of GiveMeBackMyCredit.com , wrote in her recent Sun Sentinel post, “ShameTheBanks.org is a great non-commercial location for consumers to share their stories about fighting the banking system, lowering their interest rates, or advocating for student loan rights. It is also a resource, providing homeowners with mortgage and loan information drawn from across the Internet and beyond, all in one location.” Richardson also sent us an e-mail shortly after the site was announced on Huff Post . “I never heard of the site, so went to see if it was a legit site — I was thrilled that it was,” she wrote eluding to the enormous number of commercial sites offering similar information at a cost to already cash-strapped and desperate homeowners. Unfortunately not every site covering the crisis is as dedicated to helping homeowners or grateful to see another site as Richardson is. Earlier this month, in an effort to inform Congress and the powers that be about the daunting experiences homeowners were facing in getting loan modifications, I visited homeowner forums to solicit stories from people. On a recent visit to one forum I posted a request for information from homeowners who had received trial modifications and been granted permanent modifications. I wanted to repudiate the amount of “successful” modifications banks and servicers have claimed. The owner of the site banned me from the site the same day, claiming that I was self promoting, though it was difficult to read his response amongst the ads on the site. Over the last year, while blogging about the crisis, I have received a number of e-mails from homeowners recounting their stories and difficulties in getting any relief in this crisis. Each story is different and was sent with the hope that comes with media attention. As I wrote in my last post, “Every once in a while a story will pop up in the press about a homeowner being unfairly treated by a bank, like this Indiana couple who were denied a modification by GMAC for making their payments early . The bank is contacted by the media, the situation is rectified, the bank explains it away and inevitably they simply go back to business as usual with the rest of their customers -the ones who didn’t get media attention.” Initially people contacted me with trepidation and reserve, asking me to not mention them by name or location for fear that publicizing their plight would lead to retribution from the banks. A couple of weeks ago, facing a pile of e-mails, a few of us got together and decided to put a site together for people to tell their stories. I contacted each of the homeowners who had e-mailed me to inform them of shamethebanks.org and our intention. I fully expected to get push back and more misplaced fear. My inbox was brimming the next morning. “YES, you have my permission to use my case or words in anyway that will help another realize they are not alone and make the point the banks are scamming us by double and triple dipping ONCE they can do what they do to get our homes to auction,” was just one e-mail I received from Catherine Drake. She and her husband are among the many who have had enough and feel they have nothing to lose by coming forward and telling their story. Lori Kelly wrote, “Feel free to use my first and last name. I have nothing to hide. Except maybe the HAMP police,” she wrote. She now blogs on the site. The site is riddled with information, stories from homeowners are coming in every day, and the blogs are active. The contributors to the site are homeowners, consumer lawyers, and even some who worked for loan servicers. A few of the members have blogs on the site . Each of them is dedicated to one purpose: Helping homeowners find information and give them a voice they otherwise may not have had. The majority of of the comments are empathetic as people respond to the stories and blog posts.”I don’t even know you, but your story hits home with me,” one reader posts. Banks aren’t the only ones angering homeowners. People frustrated with how elected officials have responded to this situation leave their comments as well. “I went to Senator Feinstein’s office a few weeks back as I had petitioned for a meeting. I thought I was going to meet her, but ended up in a room with a twenty-something aide,” writes one reader. Another woman told me that Congressman Mike Conway of Texas told her, “I don’t get involved in the private sector.” Bank of America recently announced a plan to reduce principal after a tongue lashings from the White House. Treasury’s March report of modifications to date by servicer show’s Bank of America as having modified less than 10 percent of its eligible loans. There is little confidence among homeowners or economists that the bank will follow through with this recent announcement according to an NPR Radio broadcast . On March 4 Ocwen’s president, Ron Farris appeared before the Domestic Policy Subcommittee of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee and said, “In Ocwen’s experience, negative equity increases the chance of a re-default by one-and-a-half to two times.” This assessment by Farris may be accurate, but it is in stark contradiction to his companies policies. In e-mail communications and phone conversations with Jennifer Levy, an Ocwen Bank Loan Workout Specialist and Farris’ own secretary, Linda Ludwig, about our loan, both women stated emphatically that Ocwen never reduces principal, despite what their executives are quoted as saying. Ludwig even accused us of taking what they said out of context. Ocwen has been ordered by a judge to clean up their accounting , calling it “systematic abuse” and repeatedly been given a grade of “F” by the Better Business Bureau, yet Congress continues to accept their testimony without verifying any of their claims. A successful loan modification from either of Bank of America or Ocwen has yet to be reported. The public relations departments of these firms has done an excellent job convincing Congress and homeowners who are not trouble that they are doing great things, but the reality of the situation for homeowners is far from great and we’re posting new stories as they come in. In just one week shamethebanks.org has managed to reach more people than we had hoped. We’re hoping the momentum will continue and eventually reach Washington. Help spread the word and the shame at ShameTheBanks.org and tell your story about the bank or elected official treating you shamefully. Let them know that their plan isn’t working and homeowners continue to be duped out of their money and their homes.

Read the full article →

Obama Makes Unannounced Visit to Afghanistan as U.S. Steps Up Taliban War

March 28, 2010

By Hans Nichols March 28 (Bloomberg) — President Barack Obama landed in Afghanistan today on an unannounced visit to meet with Afghan government officials and get a briefing from U.S. military leaders on progress in the eight-year-old war. “I’m encouraged by the progress that’s been made” in Afghanistan, Obama said after meeting with President Hamid Karzai in Kabul. He called for more work by Afghanistan’s leaders to root out corruption and improve governance. Obama’s in the country as the U.S. role there is growing with an escalation of forces that he ordered and allied troops are engaged in an offense against the Taliban in southern Afghanistan. Landing at Bagram airfield under the cover of darkness, Obama travelled the 50 miles to Kabul by helicopter to meet with Karzai at the presidential palace. Obama also is holding a separate session with Karzai’s cabinet. Obama’s visit, his first to Afghanistan since becoming president, is intended to emphasize U.S. calls for the Afghan government to crack down on corruption, fight drug trafficking that helps fund the insurgency and institute merit-based systems for government appointments, according to James Jones , Obama’s national security adviser. “We plan to engage President Karzai as we’re going to make him understand that in this second term that there are going to be certain things he has to do as the president of his country that have not been paid attention to almost since day one,” Jones told reporters aboard Air Force One. Jones downplayed suggestions of tension between Obama and Karzai, saying, “I don’t think there’s any daylight between the two.” Karzai Invitation Obama invited Karzai for talks in Washington in May. “I want to send a strong message that partnership between the United States and Pakistan is going to continue,” Obama said. “We have seen already progress with respect to the military campaign against extremism, but we also want to continue to make progress on the civilian side.” While in Afghanistan, the president also plans to speak before U.S. troops and receive briefings from the commander he installed last June, General Stanley McChrystal , and Ambassador Karl Eikenberry , said press secretary Robert Gibbs . “One of the main reasons I am here is to just say thank you for the extraordinary efforts of our U.S. Troops,” Obama said. “All of us want to see a day when Afghanistan is going to be able to provide for its own security.” The trip, shrouded in secrecy because of security concerns, capped a week in which the president won a major domestic victory with passage of a sweeping overhaul of the U.S. health- care system and announced completion of a nuclear arms reduction treaty with Russia. Shift to Afghanistan Obama campaigned for office on a pledge to shift U.S. military resources from Iraq to Afghanistan. A year ago he ordered 17,000 combat troops and 4,000 trainers to the country ahead of Afghanistan’s elections. In December, Obama ordered another 30,000 forces be sent to the country, which ultimately will expand the number of military personnel to 100,000. At the same time he asked North Atlantic Treaty Organization countries to contribute more resources to the war. The escalation is intended to reverse Taliban gains and train afghans to take control of their country so American forces can begin withdrawing in July 2011. The U.S. is leading a drive against the Taliban in southern Afghanistan. A 30-day offensive by 15,000 Afghan and North Atlantic Treaty Organization troops, including U.S. Marines and British forces culminated earlier this month with allies taking control of the town of Marjah. Next Target It was the biggest operation against the Taliban since the 2001 U.S.-led invasion of Afghanistan following the Sept. 11 attacks by al-Qaeda. Officials have said they are making plans for an even bigger assault on the Taliban heartland city of Kandahar. As part of the Obama administration’s strategy, the U.S. also has strengthened its relationship with the government of neighboring Pakistan as well as with the Afghans. Jones and Deputy National Security Adviser Douglas Lute emphasized the importance of a regional approach to Afghanistan’s stability and said they are encouraged by the role Pakistan is playing. In 30 days, Karzai will convene a peace council with Afghan tribal and regional leaders, Lute said. Then in early May he hopes to host a foreign ministers conference in Kabul. Some Progress The effort has resulted in the capture of some top Taliban leaders in both countries and increased pressure of remnants of al-Qaeda hiding in tribal areas of the border. The U.S. is still deploying the 30,000 additional troops that Obama authorized. The U.S. will have 98,000 troops there by Sept. 30 for a total of almost 150,000 from all 34 countries in the NATO-led coalition that aims to reverse Taliban gains and train Afghan security forces to begin taking over by July 2011. Defense Secretary Robert Gates , testifying to the Senate Appropriations Committee on March 25 said the Afghan army is making “real strides” and that changes are being made to improve training of Afghan police officers. To contact the reporter on this story: Hans Nichols in Afghanistan at Hnichols2@bloomberg.net ;

Read the full article →

Dreamworks’ `Dragon’ Beats `Alice’ as Top Weekend Film With $43.3 Million

March 28, 2010

By James Callan and Michael Tsang March 28 (Bloomberg) — “How to Train Your Dragon,” DreamWorks Animation SKG Inc. ’s 3-D adventure, displaced “Alice in Wonderland” as the top film at U.S. and Canadian theaters this weekend, posting $43.3 million in ticket sales. “Alice” dropped to second after three weeks at No. 1, Hollywood.com Box-Office said today in an e-mailed statement. The Tim Burton movie has made $293 million for Walt Disney Co. in domestic theaters after four weeks of release. “How to Train Your Dragon,” which features the voices of Jay Baruchel and Gerard Butler , played in 3-D at more than half of the 4,055 theaters and in 185 in Imax venues, according to Box Office Mojo. The movie is competing for 3-D screens with “Alice” and News Corp.’s “Avatar,” the Sherman Oaks, California-based researcher said. “Clash of the Titans,” from Time Warner Inc., opens next weekend. “How to Train Your Dragon,” distributed for Dreamworks Animation by Viacom Inc.’s Paramount Pictures, tells the story of a young Viking who unexpectedly becomes the owner of one of the mythical creatures. DreamWorks’ last release, “Monsters vs. Aliens,” took in $198 million domestically, according to Box Office Mojo. “Hot Tub Time Machine,” starring John Cusack , opened in third place with $13.7 million for Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Inc. The R-rated comedy follows four men at a ski resort who are transported back in time to the 1980s, where they get a chance to alter their lives. To contact the reporters on this story: James Callan in New York at jcallan2@bloomberg.net ; Michael Tsang in New York at mtsang1@bloomberg.net .

Read the full article →

Sinopec Buys Angolan Oil Stake From Parent; Warns of Refining `Challenges’

March 28, 2010

By Bloomberg News March 29 (Bloomberg) — China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. , Asia’s biggest refiner, announced its first acquisition of a foreign oil field stake and said it faced “challenges” in the oil-processing business as competitors expand capacity. “Refining capacity is being added both inside and outside China,” the Beijing-based company known as Sinopec said in a statement yesterday as it reported 2009 profit more than doubled to 61.8 billion yuan ($9.1 billion). Sinopec said it will pay $2.5 billion to buy its parent’s stake in an Angolan oil field to boost crude-oil production. PetroChina Co. and Cnooc Ltd., Sinopec’s biggest rivals, are buying and building refineries in China and overseas to meet demand in the world’s fastest-growing major economy. Increasing oil production by almost 9 percent through the Angolan acquisition may help Sinopec counter government fuel price curbs and gain from higher crude oil prices. “This asset injection from the parent will better position Sinopec in the future,” said Gordon Kwan , head of regional energy research at Mirae Asset Securities Ltd. in Hong Kong. “It will increase its oil production business and reduce its reliance on refining.” Oil is trading 29 percent higher than last year’s average, adding to Sinopec’s raw material costs. Sinopec’s profit growth in 2010 may slow to 3 percent with net income reaching 63.73 billion yuan, according to a survey of 15 analyst estimates compiled by Bloomberg. Refining Business “The refining business will break even and profit could stay level this year, even fall slightly,” said Shi Yan , an energy analyst at UOB-Kay Hian Ltd. in Shanghai. Almost all of Sinopec’s revenue comes from refining, marketing and distributing petroleum products, according to the company’s 2007 annual report. About two percent is from oil exploration and production. The country’s second-biggest oil company and supplier of 80 percent of China’s fuel needs has risen 36 percent in Hong Kong trading over the past year compared with a 56 percent gain in the benchmark Hang Seng Index. Cnooc Ltd., China’s biggest offshore oil producer, has climbed 61 percent in the same period, while PetroChina , China’s largest energy company, has advanced 40 percent. Sinopec shares traded at HK$6.38 at the close of trading in Hong Kong last week. The company will hold 27.5 percent of Block 18 in Angola through an overseas unit, the oil refiner said in a separate statement to the Hong Kong stock exchange yesterday. The acquisition will increase Sinopec’s daily oil production by 8.8 percent, or 72,520 barrels, and boost proven reserves by 3.6 percent, or 102 million barrels. BP Plc owns 50 percent of the field. Addax Petroleum Parent China Petrochemical Corp. purchased Calgary-based Addax Petroleum Corp. for C$8.3 billion ($7.8 billion) last year to add oil reserves as domestic fuel demand rises. Spending by Chinese companies on mining and energy acquisitions reached a record $32 billion last year. China relaxed controls on fuel prices in 2008, prompting new investments in the industry. PetroChina’s acquisitions last year included a stake in Nippon Oil Corp’s Osaka processing unit and a refinery in Singapore. PetroChina plans to make its refining business “a major profit contributor,” President Zhou Jiping said last year. The parent of Cnooc, China’s biggest offshore oil producer, plans to triple the capacity of the company’s only refinery. “Demand for refined oil products is rising by about 6 percent a year, but refining capacity is increasing by about 12 percent a year,” said Shi at UOB Kay-Hian. 2009 Profit Sinopec’s 2009 profit more than doubled after the government allowed it to increase fuel prices and crude oil costs fell, according to yesterday’s statement to the Shanghai stock exchange. China raised fuel prices five times last year compared with once in 2008, while the average cost of oil dropped 38 percent amid the global economic downturn. The Beijing-based company’s 2009 earnings gained from rising domestic demand while global rivals suffered as the recession cut fuel use in Europe and the U.S. China’s fourth- quarter economic growth was the fastest since 2007. Last year, the nation overtook the U.S. to become the world’s biggest auto market, boosting demand for motor fuels. Exxon Mobil Net income at Exxon Mobil Corp. in the fourth quarter dropped 23 percent to $6.05 billion as losses at its U.S. refineries widened 14 fold, the company said in February. PetroChina on March 25 reported a 9.7 percent drop in net income as the oil producer sold crude at lower prices. Higher refining revenue failed to offset lower profits from exploration. Sinopec’s refining operating profit in 2009 was 23.1 billion yuan, compared with a loss a year earlier, according to today’s statement. Sinopec’s capital expenditure will be little changed at 112 billion yuan this year, compared with 110 billion yuan in 2009, it said today. The company plans to process 203 million tons of crude oil this year and produce 12 billion cubic meters of gas. Crude production may reach 42.55 million tons. — Wang Ying , Baizhen Chua and John Duce . Editors: Ang Bee Lin , John Viljoen . To contact the reporters on this story: Wang Ying in Hong Kong at Ywang30@bloomberg.net ;

Read the full article →

Geely Buys Volvo From Ford for $1.8 Billion in Record Chinese Auto Deal

March 28, 2010

By Ola Kinnander and Keith Naughton March 28 (Bloomberg) — Zhejiang Geely Holding Co. agreed to buy Volvo Cars from Ford Motor Co. for $1.8 billion in the biggest overseas acquisition by a Chinese automaker. The deal will close in the third quarter, after which Ford and Volvo will continue to cooperate, Ford Chief Financial Officer Lewis Booth told reporters today in Gothenburg, Sweden. The Chinese company will pay $1.6 billion in cash and the rest in a “note,” Ford said in a statement. Booming auto sales in China made the nation the largest car market last year, generating profit that’s allowing its manufacturers to reach out to Western markets and technologies. Selling Volvo will complete Ford Chief Executive Officer Alan Mulally ’s strategy of divesting European luxury lines to focus on its namesake brand. Ford has sold Jaguar, Land Rover and Aston Martin since 2007. “This could set the benchmark for more Chinese deals to come,” said Rebecca Lindland , an auto analyst at IHS Global Insight of Lexington, Massachusetts. “It potentially could allow Geely to come into the West with its own brand of vehicles.” The Swedish carmaker will tap China’s growing car market, Geely Chairman Li Shufu said at the press conference. Drop in Price Geely first approached Dearborn, Michigan-based Ford about buying Volvo in mid-2008, two people familiar with the talks have said. Ford named Geely its “preferred bidder” in October 2009 and said on Dec. 23 that they had agreed on the major terms of the transaction. Ford paid $6.5 billion for Volvo in 1999. “Compared to the business environment when we bought it, it’s a very different world,” Booth said in a March 24 interview. “We only have so much management resource, we only have so much capital to invest and we needed to make sure we were focusing on the Ford business.” Geely, China’s largest private automaker based on 2008 sales, will gain access to Volvo’s technology as well as an image boost because of the brand’s status as a premium vehicle line in China, said Vivien Chan , an analyst at SinoPac Securities Asia Ltd. in Hong Kong. Li, Geely’s founder, has said he is seeking to have half the company’s sales from overseas markets by 2015. He aims to sell 200,000 Volvos a year in China, up from 22,405 last year, and has been seeking locations for a new plant there. Biggest Car Market Sales-tax cuts for smaller vehicles combined with rural subsidies boosted nationwide auto sales in China 46 percent last year to 13.6 million, helping it supplant the U.S. as the world’s largest auto market. Volvo sold 334,808 cars worldwide last year, a decline of 11 percent from 2008 and 27 percent from a peak of about 460,000 in 2007, according to the company. Its sales in the U.S. have risen for nine consecutive months and increased 40 percent this year through February. Volvo CEO Stephen Odell said at the press conference today that the Swedish company plans to produce 390,000 cars this year, compared with 330,000 in 2009. Geely will restore profitability to Volvo, Booth said. The Swedish carmaker has about 20,000 employees worldwide, including almost 14,000 in Sweden. It has about 2,500 dealers in 100 countries. The unit’s pretax loss narrowed to $934 million last year from $1.7 billion in 2008, Ford said on Jan. 28. Volvo’s last annual pretax profit was $377 million in 2005. Saab Automobile, the Swedish auto brand that was under General Motors Co.’s control for the past two decades, was sold last month to Dutch luxury-car maker Spyker Cars NV for about $400 million. Sharing Technology Ford ended three years of losses with net income of $2.7 billion in 2009 and was the only major U.S. automaker to avoid bankruptcy. Ford has said it and Volvo will continue to share parts and technology. The Swedish carmaker’s S40 model is built on the mechanical foundation of the Ford Focus now sold in Europe. Volvo supplies diesel engines for Ford’s European lineup. Volvo’s managers endorse the sale to Geely, according to the Ford statement. To contact the reporters on this story: Ola Kinnander in Stockholm at okinnander@bloomberg.net Keith Naughton in Dearborn, Michigan, at Knaughton3@bloomberg.net

Read the full article →