June 2010

David Isenberg: Shaping Up Blackwater’s Act

June 29, 2010

There has been much talk and ritualistic hand wringing, gnashing of teeth, and tearing of hair since the news broke that the CIA awarded Xe Services, formerly Blackwater, a contract to guard some of its forward bases in war zones. CIA director Leon Panetta said on ABC’s This Week this past weekend that: State Department relies on them. We rely on them to a certain extent. So, we’ve bid out some of those contracts. They provided a bid that underbid everyone else by about $26 million and a panel that we had said that they can do the job, that they’ve shaped up their act, he said. There was really not much choice but to accept that contract,” said Panetta. I don’t know if Panetta was entirely truthful when he said they did not have much choice. After all, Blackwater may be among the biggest but it not the only firm capable of providing security for forward bases. What about DynCorp or Triple Canopy, for example? But Panetta was closer to the mark when he said that Xe Services has cleaned up its act. Let’s be honest here. I don’t know whether Xe will ever overcome the legacy of its days as Blackwater. Its genuine mistakes, as well as the years of, frequent, and often, grossly unfair characterizations of it took a toll in terms of public image. Obviously its rebranding effort has not worked, because people still think of it as Blackwater. But we need to be fair about this. It is not the same Blackwater. A lot has happened in the fifteen months since Eric Prince stepped down as President and CEO of Blackwater. Since March 2009 Xe has been led by Joseph Yorio. More important than his past Army service, at least to my way of thinking, is that he has lots of business experience running things, something Prince didn’t have prior to starting Blackwater. Yorio has worked 18 years in senior leadership roles in multinational corporations like Unisource Worldwide, Corporate Express, and DHL. According to a company overview Xe has been circulating during the past year it recognizes “that the company must work to address past, and to prevent future, errors in order to move forward,” To do so it restructured Xe’s legal department, first by retaining a partner from Crowell & Moring , a law firm with a top-tier Government Contracts practice, as its Acting General Counsel, and then by recruiting and hiring a new General Counsel, Christian Bonat, who most recently served as Senior Counsel to the General Counsel of the Department of Defense during the Obama Administration and previously as the Deputy General Counsel (Legal Counsel) of DoD in the Bush Administration. Bonat also leads the company’s anti-corruption efforts. The company has adopted a new anti-corruption policy, and is in the process of developing and implementing comprehensive compliance procedures and training, to help to ensure that all personnel are responsive to the requirements of U.S. law. While I think it would be better to not have the same person do both roles – after all, Xe can afford to pay the salary — it is a start. The company has also strengthened its commitment to accountability by hiring Karen Jones as Vice President for Export Compliance. In an innocuous, but telling sentence, the overview states, “In previous years, the company export compliance program was inadequate to address the regulatory requirements for exports of equipment in support of U.S. Government missions.” Finally, the company has instituted an Ethical Advocate Hotline managed by an independent vendor to field and respond to whistle-blower disclosures related to the company’s conduct worldwide. Once the vendor determines that a report does not implicate senior management personally, it is forwarded to the General Counsel and the COO for action. In addition to the current language and dialects offered on The Ethical Advocate website it will soon be available in a number of Afghan dialects. Of course, I wonder what happens if a report does implicate a member of senior management. I’m really not trying to be flippant here, but a hotline is only credible if a potential whistleblower thinks all disclosures are taken seriously. Perhaps Xe thinks that no member of senior management will ever do anything that merits blowing the whistle. Let’s hope that is so. So even these steps are not perfect they are significant improvements over what went before. In short, to paraphrase the old Virginia Slims cigarette commercial Blackwater has come a significant, if not a long, way, baby.

Read the full article →

Lease Up (June 27 – July 3): GSA, Neal Gerber Eisenberg Ink Major Lease Deals

June 29, 2010

Lease Up (June 27 – July 3): GSA, Neal Gerber Eisenberg Ink Major Lease Deals A Weekly Column of Major Corporate Expansions, Relocations and Lease Extensions CoStar compiles news of corporate expansions, relocations and lease extensions in the…

Read the full article →

Chris Matthews: High Speed Rail in America: Hope We Can Believe in

June 29, 2010

Let me finish tonight with the pathetic state of the economy and one big thing we can do about it. Today we learned the consumer confidence number fell nearly ten points since last month. It’s not hard to figure why. The unemployment number for May showed a dismal growth of just 41,000 in American civilian jobs. And people got the word. All this — the bad June unemployment number expected Friday, the bad consumer confidence number, the drop in the Dow — working together, and we’re looking at the plausibility of that “second dip” we’ve been warned about. I hear this all has the folks in the White House looking past a big defeat in November to what they can do going into 2012. It’s a brutal conundrum. Countries in Europe just made clear at the G-20 that they’re in no mood to boost spending to create markets for American goods. They’re tightening their belts, trying their best not be accused of doing what Greece did (living beyond their means). So we’ve got everybody in the world cutting back — and what’s that do to the prospect of an economic expansion? It kills it! If you’re looking for good news, I have one suggestion. Stop listening to Europe, stop listening to the conservatives, do what has worked in the past. What got us out of the Great Depression was production: massive industrial production to support the allies in World War Two. We need production for this country now. We need to build rapid rail to catch up to those allies from World War Two. France has the TGV . China is building its rapid rail system . It’s time we joined the movement. We need to go back to the future and become a country that builds things. It’ll create jobs. It’ll catch us up to the rest of the world. It’ll cut our reliance on oil. It’ll give us hope you can believe in. Look, Lincoln built the continental railroads even in the midst of the Civil War. Ike built the inter-state highway system in the supposedly do-nothing Fifties. President Obama… Just do it! Visit msnbc.com for breaking news , world news , and news about the economy

Read the full article →

SEC Paying $755,000 To Settle With Gary Aguirre, Lawyer Fired While Investigating Hedge Fund

June 29, 2010

WASHINGTON — The Securities and Exchange Commission is paying $755,000 to settle a lawsuit with a former staff lawyer who accused the agency of blocking his investigation of a prominent hedge fund. The SEC settlement of Gary Aguirre’s wrongful termination claim resolved a long-running controversy that prompted scrutiny in Congress and by the SEC inspector general. The settlement was announced Tuesday by the Government Accountability Project. Aguirre was fired by the SEC in September 2005. He went public in 2006 with allegations of interference by SEC officials in the probe of Pequot Capital Management and improper deference to a Wall Street executive whom Aguirre wanted to interview. That prompted an investigation by Republican staff of the Senate Judiciary and Finance Committees. The SEC initially took no enforcement action in the case, which was started in 2004 and closed in 2006. The agency reopened it in January 2009 after documents emerged in a divorce proceeding showing that Pequot began paying $2.1 million to a key witness in the case in mid-2007. Last month, Pequot and its founder and chairman, Arthur Samberg, agreed to pay a total of $28 million to settle the SEC’s charges of insider trading of Microsoft Corp. shares. The SEC alleged that the hedge fund traded Microsoft shares on confidential information provided by a former employee of the technology giant whom it later hired. Pequot, whose core hedge fund was liquidated last year, and Samberg, a well-known money manager and philanthropist, neither admitted nor denied wrongdoing. The $755,000 being paid to Aguirre represents his salary for four years and 10 months plus his attorneys’ fees, according to the Government Accountability Project, a group that works with whistleblowers. The group said it may be the largest settlement of its kind. Under terms of the settlement, which was approved by a judge at the federal Merit Systems Protection Board, Aguirre agreed to drop two related cases against the SEC. SEC spokesman John Nester said the settlement “resolves all outstanding litigation between the parties and reflects the agency’s determination to focus on its core mission of protecting investors.” Aguirre, in a statement, said “I think it’s fair to the public that the SEC pays for my work over the past four years and 10 months, since it generated $28 million to the U.S. Treasury. But it’s a shame the team I worked with at the SEC did not get to complete the Pequot investigation. The filing of the case in 2005 or 2006, before the financial crisis, would have been exactly what the Wall Street elite needed to hear at the perfect moment: the SEC goes after big fish too.” In August 2007, the Republican staff of the two Senate committees published a scathing report criticizing the SEC’s decision to fire Aguirre and close the first Pequot investigation. Sens. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, and Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania, then a Republican, spoke critically on the Senate floor that year about the SEC’s handling of the Pequot investigation. The SEC inspector general, David Kotz, in a report issued in late 2008, found there were “serious questions” about the impartiality and fairness of the agency’s probe of Pequot. “The settlement with Mr. Aguirre shows that the SEC is finally acknowledging its mistake,” Specter said in a statement Tuesday.

Read the full article →

Tracey Ann Foley, Accused Russian Spy, Was ‘Well-Liked’ And ‘Friendly,’ Her Boss Says

June 29, 2010

The boss of Massachusetts resident Tracey Ann Foley, who was arrested in connection with a massive Russian spy ring, has responded to the arrest on his company’s blog. (Hat tip to Portfolio .) Glenn Kelman , the CEO of the online real estate brokerage, Redfin , which is based in Seattle, wrote on his company’s blog that Foley was “well-liked” and “friendly.” He also defended his company’s hiring practices. Here’s Kelman : Before we hired Ms. Foley in February of this year, at least two Redfin employees interviewed her, using a template that focuses on character, specifically situations where the candidate has put customers’ interests ahead of her own, and where the candidate has worked on a team. She interviewed well. According to her application, she had worked since 2007 for the real estate brokerages Weichert and Channing Real Estate. As with every agent we hire, Redfin validated her social security number, her deal history and that her real estate license was in good standing; as with every agent we hire, we ran a criminal background check, which came up clean. The Washington Post referred to Foley, who lived in Cambridge, Massachusetts, as an “attractive, vaguely European blonde .” Foley lived with her husband, Donald Heathfield, in a $900,000 duplex near Harvard, the paper notes. Kelman added : We learned of her arrest by reading about it in the newspaper this afternoon, and haven’t communicated with her since. Because we don’t have a large human resources department to advise us on privacy matters, and since she has been accused of a grave crime, we have disclosed the facts of our relationship with Ms. Foley here, and would rather not venture opinions beyond that.

Read the full article →

Masked Protesters Clash With Greek Police (PHOTO)

June 29, 2010

(AP) ATHENS, Greece — Dozens of masked youths clashed with police at a union protest Tuesday in Athens during the country’s fifth general strike this year against the cash-strapped government’s planned pension and labor reforms. Riot police fired tear gas and stun grenades to disperse troublemakers who threw chunks of marble smashed off metro station entrances and set rubbish bins on fire. Running clashes continued along a major avenue – lined with shuttered shops and banks – as rioters armed with wooden clubs made repeated sallies against police. Seven policemen were injured in the clashes, and 13 demonstrators were detained, six of whom were arrested, police said. Riot police chased demonstrators into a main subway station, and an AP photographer saw police detain one young man in a subway car, spraying him with pepper spray. Demonstrators smashed bus stops and phone booths, and broke windows at three shops and two bank branches. The demonstration ended after a few hours, and rioters melted away toward the central Exarcheia district – a traditional anarchist hangout. However, Tuesday’s clashes were far more muted than the riots that erupted during a previous general strike on May 5, when three people died after becoming trapped in a bank torched by rioters. The violence came as some 10,000 people took part in a demonstration organized by the country’s two main labor unions and fringe left-wing groups. An earlier separate march by some 6,000 members of the Communist Party-backed PAME union ended peacefully. Tuesday’s strike shut down public services, disrupted transport, left hospitals operating on emergency staff and pulled all news broadcasts off the air. The country’s airports, however, remained open, and international flights were operating normally although nearly 100 domestic flights were canceled. Unions fiercely oppose draft legislation submitted to parliament last week that would increase retirement ages and make it cheaper for companies to fire workers. The measures – which include raising women’s retirement age to 65 to match those of men and require 40 years of social security contributions for a full pension – are aimed at fixing the country’s debt crisis, which has shaken the entire euro zone. “They’ve declared war on you, fight back!” PAME demonstrators chanted as they walked down a major avenue in the center of the capital. Greece is caught in a major debt and deficit crisis; it avoided bankruptcy last month only after receiving the first installment of a euro110 billion ($136 billion) emergency loan package from the European Union and the International Monetary Fund. In return, Athens passed painful austerity measures, cutting pensions and salaries and raising consumer taxes, and is now pushing through labor and social security reforms. Parliament is to start discussing the proposed reforms Tuesday, in a debate expected to last more than a week. Despite opposition from several of its own lawmakers, the center-left government – which holds a seven-seat majority in the 300-member house – is expected to win the final vote. Tension mounted once more in the country’s main port of Piraeus early Tuesday morning, where hundreds of PAME demonstrators attempted to prevent tourists and locals from boarding ferries to Aegean islands, even though a court had declared seamen’s participation in the strike illegal. “They want to put us in a straitjacket so we work for free all our lives so that some can have their wealth and get very rich at our expense,” said Sotiris Poulikogiannis, a protester in Piraeus. “We don’t accept this. Day by day we’ll grow stronger and more aware of how to overturn this situation.” The Civil Protection Ministry said all ships scheduled to leave in the morning did set sail, with about 350 passengers. However, about 50-100 people didn’t manage to board their ferries as strikers prevented them from entering the port. Authorities said their tickets would also be valid Wednesday. Another four ships that were to sail for Crete and the Cycladic islands in the early afternoon had informed passengers that they would depart at midnight, the ministry said. A similar strike by two seamen’s unions last week – which was also declared illegal – left thousands of travelers stranded in Piraeus for a day. Shipping companies and officials in Greece’s vital tourism industry strongly criticized the government for not taking action to stop the strikers. ____ Associated Press Television crews and photographers in Piraeus and Athens, and AP writer Nicholas Paphitis in Athens contributed.

Read the full article →

Potentially ‘Thousands’ Of Homeowners Improperly Denied Obama Mortgage Modifications, Administration Admits

June 29, 2010

Potentially “thousands” of troubled homeowners were denied opportunities to lower their monthly mortgage payments under the Obama administration’s signature foreclosure-prevention plan due to servicer errors and inadequate oversight by the Treasury Department, a government audit has found. Mortgage servicers failed to comply with basic guidelines, used different criteria to evaluate borrowers, recorded error rates up to six times their established thresholds, and couldn’t provide evidence that potentially eligible homeowners had been solicited for the administration’s Home Affordable Modification Program, also known as HAMP. The errors are partly due to Treasury’s failure to issue specific guidelines for servicers to follow, and the administration’s lack of quality-control standards. Because servicers aren’t required to adhere to the same set of standards, there’s a risk that firms aren’t identifying practices “that may lead to inequitable treatment of borrowers or harm taxpayers through greater potential for fraud or waste,” according to a Thursday report by the Government Accountability Office. But even if servicers were fraudulently modifying loans or improperly denying modifications to distressed homeowners, Treasury “has yet to establish specific consequences or penalties for noncompliance,” the GAO notes. The department has yet to fine any servicers for noncompliance, according to the report. Already, “Treasury specifically allows some differences in how servicers evaluate borrowers… that could result in inconsistent outcomes for borrowers,” the report found. The end result could be the “inequitable treatment” of struggling homeowners who were looking to an administration for help during the worst economic downturn since the Great Depression. HAMP is the centerpiece of the administration’s $75 billion effort to stem the rising tide of foreclosures. “I find it saddening and frustrating that none of these problems, which we among other people identified to Treasury over a year ago, have been meaningfully addressed,” said Diane E. Thompson, a lawyer with the National Consumer Law Center. “And as a result, we lost a major opportunity to stem the foreclosure crisis.” Last Thursday, the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee held a hearing to examine “the overall effectiveness of processes put in place by loan servicers as they implement HAMP and any other loan modification programs that help homeowners avoid foreclosures,” according to the panel’s announcement. Not a single question was asked about the GAO’s troubling findings, according to a transcript of the hearing. More than 16 months after President Barack Obama told a crowd in Mesa, Ariz., of his plan to help up to 4 million homeowners avoid foreclosure through restructured mortgages, nearly 436,000 homeowners have been kicked out of HAMP; about 340,000 homeowners have received permanent relief. Servicers largely pin the blame on homeowners, who either fail to provide documents required to modify their mortgages, miss monthly payments or lie about their situation, like their income. Treasury has echoed that complaint, but it’s also pointed its finger as servicers who were slow to gear up for perhaps the biggest effort ever to modify home mortgages and lower borrowers’ monthly payments, and thus at times proved inept to handle the volume. The GAO’s report, however, raises fresh questions about the effectiveness of a government program that repeatedly promised to help millions of distressed borrowers keep their homes and its overseers entrusted with that responsibility. The Treasury Department declined to comment, referring instead to its June 14 letter to GAO. In its letter, Treasury said it had begun to address many of the shortcomings identified by the GAO. For example, Treasury has created a compliance committee to review results and ensure consistent treatment. Also, the agency has carried out on-site reviews of servicers’ performance. But perhaps most important of all, “we believe the GAO did not sufficiently take into account the scope and complexity of the challenges Treasury faced when it developed and implemented a modification initiative, the scale of which has never been previously attempted,” Treasury Assistant Secretary for Financial Stability Herbert M. Allison, Jr. wrote. Among the problem areas GAO identified in its report: Half of the 10 servicers GAO interviewed experienced a 20-percent error rate for calculating borrower income when it came to processing loan modifications, when the servicers’ “own established error thresholds” were “often set at 3 to 5 percent.” GAO noted that “without accurate income calculations, similarly situated borrowers… may be inappropriately deemed eligible or ineligible” for HAMP modifications; Four of the 10 servicers properly test their results to ensure compliance; Treasury’s compliance unit identified four servicers that “could not always provide evidence that borrowers who were potentially eligible for HAMP had been solicited,” as is required; Some servicers erroneously charged borrowers “fees prohibited by HAMP guidelines” or failed to reduce borrowers’ monthly payments to 31 percent or less of their gross monthly income, a HAMP requirement; At least one servicer’s review of denied HAMP modifications focuses on whether borrowers were sent denial letters, rather than actually checking to see if homeowners were “appropriately” denied HAMP modifications; Treasury’s lack of clear consequences “risks inconsistent treatment of servicer noncompliance and lacks transparency with respect to the severity of the steps it will take for specific types of noncompliance”; Seven of the 10 servicers it contacted used different sets of criteria for determining “imminent default”. “While Treasury’s goal is to create uniform, clear, and consistent guidance for loan modifications across the servicing industry, as we noted in March 2010, Treasury has not provided specific guidance on how to determine whether borrowers are in imminent danger of default,” the GAO found. “As also noted in SIGTARP’s March 2010 report on HAMP, this lack of consistent and clear standards could mean that servicers are inconsistently applying criteria in this area and thereby inequitably treating borrowers across the program.” But “of concern,” GAO noted, was that Treasury’s compliance unit found that “15 of the largest 20 participating servicers did not comply with various aspects of the program guidelines” when it came to calculating whether borrowers were eligible for HAMP mods. The calculation, which requires using things like borrower income, the homeowner’s equity in their home, and other inputs to determine eligibility, is called the “net present value” test. In short, if the calculation shows that the owner of the loan — which includes investors — would get more money from a modified mortgage than a foreclosure, then the borrower qualifies for a HAMP modification. This complicated computer program has been guarded with relative secrecy by Treasury. Broad outlines describing the test have been publicly released, but specifics remain undisclosed. Because of errors in running these tests — and Treasury’s “lack of specific guidelines” in ensuring servicers grade themselves in a consistent manner — the number of borrowers who were denied HAMP modifications “could range from a handful to thousands, depending on the size of the servicer and the extent of the error,” GAO reports, citing the Treasury Department. Treasury is making servicers reach out to those homeowners. “None of these problems are new,” Thompson said. “There is no oversight and no accountability for this program. “There are thousands of people, maybe more than a million, who have lost their homes. It’s too late for them.”

Read the full article →

Chinese Companies ‘Renting’ White People, CNN Reports

June 29, 2010

For a day, a weekend, a week, up to even a month or two, Chinese companies are willing to pay high prices for fair-faced foreigners to join them as fake employees or business partners.

Read the full article →

Exobox Announces New CTO

June 29, 2010

HOUSTON, TX–(Marketwire – June 29, 2010) –  Exobox Technologies Corp. ( OTCBB : EXBX ) announced today Mark Kerzner is rejoining the Exobox team as its new Chief Technology Officer, effective July 1st, 2010. Mark has over 20 years of software developer experience. Mark previously worked for Exobox for almost a year as a Senior Software Developer, and later as a consultant to Exobox. Mark’s education includes an MS in Math from St. Petersburg University, another MS in Computer Science from St. Petersburg Electrical Engineering Institute, and a recent JD from Novus University. Mark’s goal in getting a law degree was to acquire practical knowledge of law and specifically, eDiscovery. This will enable him to lead software development projects in security, eDiscovery, and forensics. Mark is a Mensa member, and speaks seven languages.

Read the full article →

Andrew Winston: Nike’s Open (Green) Innovation

June 29, 2010

One of the hottest concepts in strategy and management today is the idea of ” open innovation .” Gone are the highly secluded R&D departments funded by a single company, carefully guarding secrets from the outside and even from other divisions. In its place, in theory, are hubs of collaboration capturing ideas from customers, academia, or some guys in a garage somewhere. Given the simultaneous growth of the sustainability movement, it’s no surprise that companies are starting to combine the concepts and try to create open green innovation. The general idea of this new collaborative approach to innovation has been kicking around since the 2003 publication of Open Innovation by professor Henry Chesbrough at UC Berkeley (see a recent article he wrote with some key examples here ). But it’s been gaining real currency in recent years as (a) large companies such as Procter & Gamble and IBM have embraced the concept, (b) the platforms for accessing many brains through social media have evolved, and (c) companies have looked for low-cost innovation pathways during tight times. The green shade of open innovation has appeared more recently. Earlier this year, Nike, Best Buy, Yahoo!, and a few others launched the GreenXChange , an organization dedicated to sharing patents and ideas that can help companies reduce their environmental impacts. The core non-corporate partner is Creative Commons , the godfather of modern idea sharing and an organization “dedicated to making it easier for people to share and build upon the work of others.” I met some of the key players in the GreenXChange consortium — and saw Professor Chesbrough speak — at the recent Sustainable Brands Conference . Nike managers described how this fascinating agreement to share patents works in practice. Earlier in the 2000s, Nike had developed a “green rubber” that lowered production costs and slashed toxic emissions by 96 percent. The company offered up this technology and the Canadian outdoor equipment company, Mountain Equipment Co-op, licensed it (for what I sense is a nominal fee) to apply to its products. Members of the GreenXChange contribute patents for new methods of production that reduce energy, water, toxicity, and so on. Each company can learn from and build on what has come before. As the Nike managers put it, companies have latent ideas and technologies sitting on shelves, not being used. Why not let others in? Is open innovation a great thing for sustainability? A couple of major points in its favor: First, it certainly represents heretical innovation of the innovation process itself, and I’m big proponent of asking heretical questions. Second, the energy, toxicity, waste, and water challenges the world faces are so great and pressing, we don’t have time to wait for every organization to discover cleaner ways of operating on its own — we need to share information and speed up adoption of new methods and technologies. We need cooperation across traditional boundaries and open innovation to solve the biggest problems, and that means companies sharing much more than they’re used to. But I’ll admit to having one major reservation about this innovation strategy. One of the core arguments for going green is that it creates competitive advantage, a logic that makes sustainability palatable to many corporate leaders. A skeptical executive would be completely right to ask, “Won’t sharing our ideas level the playing field and give away the keys to the candy store?” Imagine getting your patent attorney on board. Well, Nike execs brought theirs to the conference and he talked about his personal journey to seeing the value — to society and to Nike — in exchanging patents. I asked the manager leading the GreenXChange project my core question about giving up competitive advantage. Her logic was interesting. When the company discovers something like green rubber, “people” (meaning, I think, their employees and other key stakeholders) expect the company to do the right thing and spread the word — and so Nike does just that. But there are certain kinds of innovations the company wouldn’t share. The ideal shoe, this manager imagines, would likely be made from one material (which would greatly reduce its material use and lifecycle footprint and make recycling very easy). If Nike could accomplish this feat, the new geometry and design would be all Nike’s, and thus a source of real advantage. In the end, I come down firmly on the side of supporting open green innovation, especially given the scale and nature of the challenges we face. But for each company, the supporting logic for open green innovation will need to be balanced by a good understanding of where and when to share ideas, and which ideas are unique to the company’s core competencies — such as design and branding, in Nike’s case. Those latter ideas will drive profit and advantage. For now, it seems that Nike has this delicate balancing act down. This post first appeared at Harvard Business Review Online

Read the full article →

Scott Brown’s Opposition To Bank Fee Throws Wrench In Wall Street Reform

June 29, 2010

WASHINGTON (AP) — Top Democratic House and Senate negotiators who worked out a deal on a sweeping overhaul of financial regulations regrouped Tuesday to eliminate a $19 billion fee on banks that had threatened to derail the legislation. Eager to salvage one of President Barack Obama’s legislative priorities, lawmakers replaced the bank fee with budget adjustments involving the $700 billion bank bailout and increased premiums on bank deposit insurance. The bill’s fate was thrown into doubt this week following the death of Sen. Robert Byrd, D-W.Va., and after Republican Sen. Scott Brown of Massachusetts vowed to abandon his support for the bill if it retained the assessment on large banks and hedge funds. The money would be used to pay for the costs of the legislation. Uncertainty surrounding the bill raised doubts about Congress’ ability to complete the bill this week – a target both the White House and Democratic leaders. The House was still expected to vote on the bill Wednesday, but the Senate likely would take up the bill in two weeks following a recess. The legislation would rewrite financial regulations by putting new limits on bank activities, creating an independent consumer protection bureau and adding new rules for largely unregulated financial instruments. Besides Brown, Republican Sens. Olympia Snowe and Susan Collins of Maine, both of whom also voted for the Senate bill last month, said they, too, had qualms about the bank assessment that negotiators inserted into the bill last week. Without Byrd’s vote, the support of the three Republicans would be crucial to overcome 60-vote procedural hurdles that could defeat the legislation. Seeing nearly a year of work crumbling, Senate Banking Committee Chairman Chris Dodd, D-Conn., proposed Tuesday to replace the bank fee and pay for the bill with $11 billion that would be freed by ending the government’s authority to use the $700 billion bank bailout fund. Under that plan, the balance of the cost could be covered by increasing premium rates paid by commercial banks to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. to insure bank deposits. The additional FDIC premium would be paid by banks with assets greater than $10 billion. The bailout fund, known as the Troubled Asset Relief Program or TARP, was scheduled to expire in October. The new proposal would end TARP when the bill is enacted, essentially cutting Congress’ spending authority from $700 billion to $475 billion. That creates an accounting adjustment that would help cover the bill’s costs. Senate Republicans on the House-Senate conference committee angrily denounced Dodd’s proposal as “smoke and mirrors” that violated Congress’ intent to devote TARP repayments to reducing the deficit. “The American taxpayer should be affronted by this little bit of sleight of hand and gamesmanship,” said Sen. Judd Gregg, R-N.H. “What a piece of misleading, misdirected financial management this is.” The House Financial Services Committee chairman, Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass., who said the new proposal was worked out with Brown, Collins and Snowe, said he preferred the bank fee, which would be assessed on banks with assets greater than $50 billion and hedge funds of more than $10 billion. “I’m getting caught in the middle of an intra-Republican debate here,” he said. “The criticism by the Republican senators was aimed at a provision aimed at satisfying Sens. Snowe, Collins and Brown.” He added: “Why anyone would think that the large financial institutions should not pay the administrative costs, I don’t know, but apparently you couldn’t get 60 senators.”

Read the full article →

Joseph Casias: Walmart Fired Me For Using Medical Marijuana

June 29, 2010

DETROIT — A man who uses medical marijuana to treat symptoms of an inoperable brain tumor and cancer claims in a lawsuit filed Tuesday he was wrongfully fired from a Walmart store in Michigan after testing positive for the drug. Joseph Casias was fired last year after five years on the job in Battle Creek despite being legally registered with the state to use the drug, according to the lawsuit against the world’s largest retailer in state court. Casias, 30, said he didn’t use marijuana at work or come to work under the influence. Scott Michelman, a staff attorney with the American Civil Liberties Union, said the lawsuit aims to test the extent that Michigan’s law protects employees. “No patient should be forced to choose between adequate pain relief and gainful employment, and no employer should be allowed to intrude upon private medical choices made by employees in consultation with their doctors,” Michelman said. Michigan voters approved medical marijuana use in 2008. Federal law still prohibits the sale and cultivation of the drug. Bentonville, Ark.-based Wal-Mart Stores Inc. said in a statement that it is an “unfortunate situation all around.” It said it is sympathetic to Casias’ condition but said it is an issue of customer and employee safety. “The doctor prescribed treatment was not the relevant issue. The issue is about the ability of our associates to do their jobs safely,” the company said. “As more states allow this treatment, employers are left without any guidelines except the federal standard.” Casias’ drug test was given after he injured his knee at work in November, but the positive result on the urine test only indicated drug use in recent days or weeks, according to the lawsuit in Calhoun County Circuit Court. Casias said the injury had nothing to do with marijuana use; he simply stepped the wrong way. Fourteen states provide protections for patients who use marijuana as recommended by a doctor. While still illegal under federal law, U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder announced last year the Obama administration would relax prosecution guidelines. Some state courts, however, haven’t upheld employee protections. In April, the Oregon Supreme Court ruled that an employer is not required to accommodate the use of medical marijuana, saying state law is trumped by federal law. And in recent years, state supreme courts in Montana and California have ruled that medical marijuana laws don’t protect employees from being fired for using the drug. The ACLU argues, however, said Michigan’s law more explicitly protects employees from being disciplined for legally using medical marijuana. It said that includes Casias’ case, but not those who use the drug at work, for example. Casias’ cancer has been in remission for nine years, but the married father of two’s medical condition interferes with his ability to speak and causes pain. He said the use of medical marijuana, which was recommended by his oncologist after the law took effect, has decreased his pain without nausea that accompanied a previous medication. “For some people, working at Wal-Mart is just a job, but for me, it was a way of life,” Casias, of Battle Creek, said in a statement. “I came to Wal-Mart for a better opportunity for my family and I worked hard and proved myself. I just want the opportunity to continue my work.” The ACLU and its Michigan branch represent Casias along with attorney Daniel W. Grow in the lawsuit against Wal-Mart and a store manager.

Read the full article →

H&R Block Initiates Search for New General Counsel

June 29, 2010

KANSAS CITY, MO–(Marketwire – June 29, 2010) –   H&R Block ( NYSE : HRB ) today reported that the company is initiating a search for a new general counsel. Brian Woram, the company’s current general counsel, will leave the company as of July 2 for a new leadership opportunity.

Read the full article →

Liz Ryan: Help Me Write a Great Resume Bullet!

June 29, 2010

Dear Liz, I’ve never liked “puffing myself up” and always hated resumes for that reason. How can I say I’m an expert at anything when there’s always so much to learn (especially in my field)? Thanks, Maggie Dear Maggie, The good news is that we don’t have to puff ourselves up in a resume. We can tell stories. The story lets the reader know what we’ve done and lets him or her decide whether we’re a good fit. When we focus on the stories, we don’t need to stand back and praise ourselves. Stories also get across our abilities much more powerfully than our suspect self-assessments do. “I negotiated a $50K discount in our $175K annual office-supplies order” is a gazillion times stronger than “Strong negotiating skills.” We tend to believe the first person because s/he’s specific. About the second person, we may think “Well, I’m glad you’re impressed with your own negotiating skills.” Take care, Liz Dear Liz, The storytelling part is the tough part for me. But I’m doing my best. I never thought of asking the money I saved my employers and/or clients, and now of course it’s too late. Wish I’d done that. Hmm… Thanks, Maggie Dear Maggie, It’s not too late to tell stories about our past jobs, or figure out what we saved employers or clients in the past. You don’t need to know the exact dollar savings or the revenue your employers realized from your work. We can extrapolate. As long as we could make a reasonable case for the calculation that gave us the number on our resume (if asked – and that’s not likely) we are good to go. Here’s a way to think about that economic value: remember the pain that got your employer to give you a certain assignment in the first place. What was wrong? Now imagine what that problem was costing the employer in lost sales or added expense, per month. Post another question if you’re not sure how to get those numbers. Best, Liz Dear Liz, Ok, here’s a real world example: 15+ years ago I was the admin assistant at a hospital. One of the nurses noticed my design skills, and asked me to redesign one of the hospitals business forms. So I did, and found it fun. She was part of the Business Forms Committee, at the time, and after that form I became the designer for the committee. I can’t remember how many business forms I designed, and redesigned, but it became a hospital-wide project. At one point, the Print Room called me asking how I was designing the business forms, and if I was using the software they were using. I told him I was designing the forms in Microsoft Word (and Excel when necessary). He wasn’t too happy about that, and a few months later, it was understandable why. The hospital no longer needed the Print Room, and software for designing business forms. They were also able to cut the team that only handled this area. I haven’t a clue how much money I saved the hospital. By designing the forms in Word and Excel, each department was able to print the forms when necessary and no longer had to wait for them to be printed downstairs. Thanks, Maggie Dear Maggie, Great example! That’s tremendous. You saved the hospital at least $100k/year in print room expenses by pioneering desktop publishing. The fact that you sort of fell into it is a wonderful part of the story. (I feel sorry for the guy, but if he had been a bit more up on what’s going on in the content world he would have been better prepared.) Your resume bullet might look like this (it’ll depend on what title you had there, and what sorts of jobs you’re looking for now): – I designed one business form in Word, leading to the assignment to re-design forms across the hospital and ultimately, move all business form design to the desktop, saving $100K+/year Extrapolating the numbers (savings, in this case) is the easy part. You’ve already done the harder part, recalling the stories. We’re so trained to say “I answered calls, I went to meetings” that it’s easy for us to forget killer stories like yours! Way to go, Maggie! Liz p.s. My online courses “Put a Human Voice in Your Resume” and “Build Your Personal Brand” kick off this week. There’s more info here.

Read the full article →

The Most Unexpectedly Profitable Celebrity Businesses

June 29, 2010

Can’t take celebrity prankster Ashton Kutcher seriously? Think again. The actor has built something of a mini-media empire and is one of a handful of celebs who are making millions in their side jobs. Sure, there’ve been plenty of celebrity businesses and start-ups over the years — and many don’t get too far once the buzz dies down. But there are certainly a few celebrity businesses from which entrepreneurs could learn a lesson. Successful celebrity entreprenuers are known for creating unique ideas , zeroing in on niches , and for some putting an emphasis

Read the full article →

Ron Ashkenas: Beware Self-Inflicted Complexity

June 29, 2010

Cross-posted from Harvard Business Online If you’ve read the papers lately, it sounds like “complexity” is the explanation for many of the world’s problems. A feature story in the Sunday New York Times business section, titled “It’s Complicated,” suggested that too much complexity was behind the financial crisis, the difficulty in understanding health care reform, and the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico. The author of the article, David Segal, summed it up this way: “Complexity used to signify progress…the riddle of some advance in technology. Now complexity lurks behind the most expensive and intractable issues of our age.” Of course blaming complexity for various problems sounds good and may even feel good, but it doesn’t really accomplish anything unless we can do something about it. But in order to move into action, we first need to look at the difference between naturally occurring (and perhaps inevitable) complexity and complexity that is unnecessary and self-generated. With the former, the best we can do is to learn how to live with it; while the second type of complexity we can attack. Unfortunately, the two are often intertwined. And that’s where things really start to get complex. Let’s look at the ecological disaster in the Gulf of Mexico. Many aspects of this drama are just plain complex. Trying to stop the flow of an oil gusher 5000 feet below the surface in extremely cold water is a complex engineering challenge — as was the original exploration, drilling, and construction of the oil rig in the first place. Similarly, trying to contain the oil and limit the environmental impact is also complex, involving multiple technologies, the coordination of public agencies and private sector firms, and the mobilization of huge amounts of equipment and people. This is “inevitable complexity” — the application of advanced technologies and human ingenuity to solve new problems in uncharted and unclear waters (excuse the metaphor). What makes the Gulf situation so frustrating however is that a certain amount of unnecessary complexity may have contributed to the disaster in the first place, and since has made it harder to resolve. On the BP side it seems like operating pressures and quality assurance procedures were not properly balanced; and the accountability between BP and the operating company was unclear. From a safety perspective, the mixture of regulatory authority and industry support made it difficult to insist on compliance to disaster prevention standards. Then after the accident the confusion of responsibility between BP, the oil rig operator, and federal and local government slowed down the response and created disjointed and unclear communications. It’s possible to argue that these complexity issues are also the inevitable result of having multiple organizations trying to work together. But that would be a cop out. If the leaders of BP and government agencies had a constant and consistent focus on clarifying accountability, sharpening regulatory authority, and making it easy to do things the right way, the Gulf spill might have been prevented. This type of complexity is self-created by the way we structure and manage our organizations. And when combined with the already-existing complexity of technology and business, disasters can occur. But this isn’t just a problem for large-scale public issues. Every organization includes a mix of inevitable and preventable complexity. We have complex technologies and manufacturing procedures, multi-stream product discovery and development processes, intricate partnerships with suppliers and customers. All of these are complex. But when we amplify the complexity by adding unnecessary layers of management, confused accountability, slow and unclear decisions, garbled communications, and lack of focus, it’s our own fault. Maybe we don’t create ecological disasters, but we do create small ones in our own organizations every day. It’s easy to bash complexity. But we need to also look in the mirror and ask ourselves whether we are adding to the complexity. What’s your view?

Read the full article →

Robert Rosenthal: My Breakfast With Jeffrey

June 29, 2010

Jeffrey Hayzlett is a big, boisterous, pickup truck drivin’, pheasant hunting, South Dakotan cowboy. Part time. Most of the time, he is one of the most successful and well-known marketers in the country, having spent the last four years as the Chief Marketing Officer of Kodak. Hailed as a “celebrity CMO,” you might recognize him from his appearances on The Apprentice . And now he is an author, too, of the recently released business book, The Mirror Test , already in its second printing. We sat down recently to talk about the state of marketing, the state of South Dakota, and the best way to eat pheasant. Robert Rosenthal: Talk about the importance of ‘marketing’ in business today. Jeffrey Hayzlett: It all comes down to one thing: sales. The impact on growing the bottom line of your business. They say in good times advertise and in bad times advertise more — that couldn’t be more true today. Marketing should exist to grow sales and with that comes satisfied customers and greater margins. But let me add one thing: marketing “buzz” is not sales. When people talk to me about buzz, I tell them to buzz their way right out the door. Without specific sales expectations attached, buzz is like a whoopee cushion: a joke that has all the noise and none of the consequences of the real thing. RR: What is the impact of social media on marketing today? JH: In the broadest and briefest stroke possible: speed. Thanks to social networks and technological advances, information can be delivered and feedback can happen from any device, almost anywhere and at any time. But speed is nothing without relevancy. Your messages will never have a chance of getting through and be well received unless they are relevant to the customer or the community you are marketing or responding to. RR: How is that achieved? JH: In social media, relationships matter and those relationships must be maintained with relevant messages that are communicated regularly and authentically. But this is hard work to maintain. A lot of businesses think speed means easy. Not so. Social media is not exercise. You should not do it moderately. You need to drive it, set the tone, and support it or it will cost you more than money. Today if a company is not doing this to engage its customers and team it will fail to keep growing and die. RR: Speaking of speed, talk about the “118″ you write about in The Mirror Test. JH: The “118″ is my version of what some people still call “the elevator pitch.” Problem is that time used to mean three to five minutes. Now, an average elevator ride is about two minutes. But you only have seconds before I tune you out and maybe two minutes after that to completely sell me with your initial pitch. That’s where I came up with the 118. It’s the 118 seconds you actually have to pitch: 8 compelling seconds to hook me and up to 110 seconds to drive it home — less than two minutes with only seconds to spare. The first eight seconds is the length of time the average human can concentrate on something and not lose some focus. It is also the length of time of one of the toughest rides in the world: a qualified ride in professional bull riding. You must hold on as one of the meanest, toughest animals in the world tries to throw you off — just like any good prospect will. And if you make it those 8 seconds, I’ll give you 110 more to drive your message home with no bull. But please: No 30-page PowerPoints. If Moses could present the commandments in two slides, five bullet points each, you can do the same thing with yours. – Jeff Hayzlett RR: Did you learn more from running your own small business or from working at a Fortune 500 company? JH: Both. I’m not trying to be a smartass. I learned the core tenets of the things that were good for business in a small business. I learned the scale at a company like Kodak. I describe it in The Mirror Test , as “just zeroes.” The things that are good in big business are good in small business. There’s just a lot more of them. I learned better techniques and more sophistication in the bigger business and for that I’m very grateful. RR: Like you, I’ve traveled the world and have friends on every continent except Antarctica, but I don’t know anyone from South Dakota. JH: That happens a lot. Now you can say, “I know Jeff.” And that’s the way South Dakota is, that’s what really cool. I will be in England and all of sudden I’ll run into somebody for the first time and they’ll say, “oh, I know this person from South Dakota,” and they’ll tell me and I know who they are. That’s the kind of state that we live in. RR: How did growing up there inform your life experience? JH: A lot of my directness came from that. RR: It’s a very direct place? JH: Well, it’s a very polite place; but we’re really honest and everybody knows everybody and everybody’s business. Ok, I take it a step further and say, we know it, let’s just quit hiding it behind the counter and let’s talk about it. You all know that this guy is the smart guy and that guy isn’t and this guy is the rich guy… let’s not make believe we’re all the same because we’re not all the same. So I think there’s a real directness in South Dakota. It’s a populist state. That’s where the populist movement came from back in the late 1800′s. So it’s a big part of who we are. RR: I don’t see a lot of directness in corporate America today. I don’t know if we’re afraid of it, or for what reason we shun it, but it’s not a part of how companies behave. JH: Well, most companies try to avoid it because directness can cause them liability. So they look at it from a constriction point rather than an expansion point. Growth companies look at those things as an expansion point. With very big growth companies and growth cultures, you see a lot more of that. It’s like a high performance football team. A quarterback should say to the guard, “You missed the block.” We all know he missed his block. Why do we come back to the huddle and not talk about it. Instead, it should be, “Hit that guy next time.” RR: One of the consequences of social media is that, in effect, it forces more directness. JH: Oh, without question. I think because of the nature of the microscope that we live in, everything has become so public. You have to be concerned with what your brand looks like in this very transparent culture. But, if you don’t have something real at the core, then it really doesn’t matter, and that will be exposed very quickly. RR: For example… JH: You can be Apple, but unless you create a really cool product, then you can’t sell it. They happen to have cool products and they sell them at a premium. At one time, it wasn’t that way. And all companies go through that cycle. And that’s one of the key points: I always find companies are real successful when they go back to the core of who they are. RR: What do you want your legacy to be? JH: He was a good person. He helped. He contributed in some way. He’s a valuable member of the team. RR: What trait do you most admire in a person? JH: Openness. Awareness. Receptive to things. RR: What is the best way to prepare pheasant? JH: My favorite is what I call South Dakota Sweet & Sour . Start with pheasant breasts and cut them into thin strips, the smaller the better I think. Dip them in eggs, then coat them with seasoned flour and bread crumbs (or just flour will do) then fry them up just like chicken. I prefer peanut oil myself, but any will work. When done coat them with this special gourmet sweet and sour sauce… ketchup, vinegar, and sugar in equal parts. Take a cup of each and mix together and heat. You can adjust the amounts to your taste, but equal parts of each ingredient is best. Mix and heat then pour it over the fried fowl and you have a great appetizer or serve it up with some rice. Seriously good. RR: Let’s play name association. RR: Trump JH: Driven RR: Lady Gaga JH: Artistic RR: Rush Limbaugh JH: Loud RR: Ann Coulter JH: Shrill RR: Martha Stewart JH: Conglomerate RR: Seth Godin JH: Quirky RR: Ashton Kutcher JH: Cool RR: Steve Jobs JH: Vision RR: What’s your favorite meal? JH: Bone-in rib eye steak, medium rare, salad, and potato. And diet Mountain Dew. I could have that every night. (Note: If his wife is reading this, perhaps I mis-heard. He might have said grilled chicken and steamed vegetables.) RR: You have a motto? JH: Jump off the cliff. No one’s gonna die. RR: What talent would you most like to have? JH: Music. I have no rhythm. I wish I did. I’d be the first one voted off on Dancing With The Stars . Actually, Dance Your Ass Off would be more appropriate. RR: Why buy your new book? What do you hope readers get? JH: Practical advice about asking the key questions you need to survive and thrive in your business. RR: What do you know for sure? JH: That I don’t know what I don’t know. Here’s a link to Jeffrey Hayzlett’s book, The Mirror Test .

Read the full article →

Kathy Ruffing: Deficits Redux: Don’t Forget Interest Costs

June 29, 2010

A recent Heritage Foundation backgrounder would have you believe that President Bush’s tax cuts, two wars, and a new prescription drug program under Medicare “play a relatively minor role in the growth of future deficits.” Quite the contrary, the tax cuts alone are a huge factor. In 2019 alone, the Bush-era tax cuts (assuming that lawmakers extend them) plus interest would cost over $700 billion, or more than half of the roughly $1.3 trillion deficit we project for that year if the federal government continues current tax and spending policies. (Heritage understates the real effect of the tax cuts on the deficit by ignoring the increase in interest payments they cause The government has to borrow to make up for the lost revenues, which leads to larger debt and higher interest costs.) This doesn’t mean that we could solve the entire long-term deficit problem simply by letting the tax cuts expire as scheduled. But it does mean that both sides of the budget — expenditures and revenues, including the tax cuts — need to be on the table when serious conversations about deficit reduction begin. Heritage’s backgrounder is part of a continuing effort by some critics to absolve President Bush of the blame for current and future deficits and shift attention to other factors, such as the new policies of President Obama and the 111 th Congress. But their arguments don’t add up, as we explain in today’s updated paper . Kathy Ruffing is a senior policy analyst at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities and blogs regularly at Off the Charts.

Read the full article →

BRS Aerospace Appoints Sebastian Valdez as New CFO

June 29, 2010

SOUTH ST. PAUL, MN–(Marketwire – June 29, 2010) –  Ballistic Recovery Systems, Inc. d/b/a BRS Aerospace (“BRS” or the “Company”) of South St. Paul, Minnesota, USA ( PINKSHEETS : BRSI ) announced the appointment of Mr. Sebastian Valdez as Chief Financial Officer and a member of the Board of Directors of BRS. Thomas H. Adams Jr., a member of the BRS board since 1986, is retiring effective immediately. Sebastian Valdez will take Adams’ place on the board.

Read the full article →

Dave Johnson: The Real Deficit Is Jobs!

June 29, 2010

This post originally appeared at Campaign for America’s Future (CAF) at their Blog for OurFuture . I am a Fellow with CAF. The real deficit is jobs. That is one more of those things that everyone can see in front of their faces, but we’re told it isn’t what it is. There aren’t enough jobs, and we’re being told this is our fault because we wanted pensions and good wages and vacations and respect and dignity and please, sir, just a little slice of the pie. In case you haven’t noticed, the world’s economy is suddenly undergoing a classic “Shock Doctrine”-style, coordinated propaganda attack. The wealthy and powerful, having insisted that countries cut their taxes and run up debt , now insist that the middle class and poor must work harder, have their pensions reduced, sell off (to them) their publicly-held resources, and take other “austerity” steps to pay off the debt that these lazy, parasitic peasants dared to run up. The excuse is that “the markets” will “lose confidence” in us. Apparently we aren’t working the salt mines hard enough . “The markets” — that’s the crowd who got in trouble and insisted that the world would end unless we immediately handed over to them all the rest of the money in the world — will “lose confidence” in our ability to work the mines hard enough, and will cut us off, unless we cut our pensions, sell off (to them) our resources, and promise never to be lazy and make demands for better wages, pensions, workplace safety, and do it now . The real deficit is jobs. History teaches that the way out of an economic slowdown is to invest in infrastructure, education and modernizing manufacturing. Slactivist said it best the other day: This calls to mind an old story: But knowing their hypocrisy, he said unto them, “Why are you putting me to the test? Bring me a dime and let me see it.” And they brought one. Then he said to them, “Whose head is this — FDR’s or Herbert Hoover’s?” They answered, “Roosevelt’s.” And he said unto them, “Right. So shut up. Have you morons already forgotten the 20th Century? When the choice is between imitating what worked and what really, really didn’t work, why are you pretending it’s terribly complicated?” And after that, no one dared to ask him any question. I’m not an economist, but we’ve got five applicants for every single job opening. If you tell me that the best response to that situation is to lay off hundreds of thousands of teachers, I will not accept that this means that you’re smarter and more expert than I am. I will instead conclude — regardless of your prestige or position or years of study — that you’re a moral imbecile. According to the Labor Department: By the end of 2009, the jobless rate stood at 10.0 percent and the number of unemployed persons at 15.3 million. Among the unemployed, 4 in 10 (6.1 million) had been jobless for 27 weeks or more, by far the highest proportion of long-term unemployment on record, with data back to 1948. That’s right, it was the policies of austerity that created a depression, and the policies of job-creation, infrastructure investment and taxing the wealthy to pay for it that got us out. But that was back when We, the People were still in charge. In other news: Number Of Millionaires Grew Amid Recession . The rich grew richer last year, even as the world endured the worst recession in decades. Top 1 Percent of Americans Reaped Two-Thirds of Income Gains in Last Economic Expansion , Income Concentration in 2007 Was at Highest Level Since 1928, New Analysis Shows: Two-thirds of the nation’s total income gains from 2002 to 2007 flowed to the top 1 percent of U.S. households, and that top 1 percent held a larger share of income in 2007 than at any time since 1928, according to an analysis of newly released IRS data by economists Thomas Piketty and Emmanuel Saez. During those years, the Piketty-Saez data also show, the inflation-adjusted income of the top 1 percent of households g rew more than ten times faster than the income of the bottom 90 percent of households. Top 1% Increased Their Share of Wealth in Financial Crisis , According to his analysis, the top 1% held 34.6% of all national wealth in 2007. By Dec. 31, 2009, they held 35.6%. Meanwhile, share of national wealth held by the bottom 90% fell to 25% from 27%. Corporate Wealth Share Rises for Top-Income Americans In 2003 the top 1 percent of households owned 57.5 percent of corporate wealth, up from 53.4 percent the year before, according to a Congressional Budget Office analysis of the latest income tax data. . . . For every group below the top 1 percent , shares of corporate wealth have declined since 1991. . . . Long-term capital gains were taxed at 28 percent until 1997, and at 20 percent until 2003, when rates were cut to 15 percent. The top rate on dividends was cut to 15 percent from 35 percent that year. See if you can make the connection. They want us to cut back our pensions, cut our wages, sell off our resources and work harder, to pay back the money that was borrowed and handed to them . Sign up here for the CAF daily summary .

Read the full article →

Cosi, Inc. Names New Executive Chef

June 29, 2010

DEERFIELD, IL–(Marketwire – June 29, 2010) –  Così, Inc. ( NASDAQ : COSI ), the premium convenience restaurant company, announced today that it has named Kimberly Letizia as its Director of Culinary Innovation & Menu Strategy.

Read the full article →

PSVillage Hires Brian Whitefield as CEO

June 29, 2010

Senior Professional Services Executive Will Drive Expansion of Services and Resources for Growing Community

Read the full article →

Matt Kelly Joins RiverPark Capital as Firm Prepares to Launch Open-End Mutual Funds

June 29, 2010

NEW YORK, NY–(Marketwire – June 29, 2010) –  RiverPark Capital, an emerging asset management company, is pleased to announce that Matt Kelly has joined the firm as a Partner in charge of the firm’s distribution and marketing efforts. 

Read the full article →

Supertex Appoints New Vice President of Marketing

June 29, 2010

SUNNYVALE, CA–(Marketwire – June 29, 2010) – Supertex, Inc. ( NASDAQ : SUPX ) today reported that the Board of Directors has promoted Hernan DeGuzman to the position of Vice President of Marketing. He joined Supertex in 2004 as our Senior Technical Marketing Manager and was elevated in 2006 to Area Sales Manager of Asia and in March 2010 to Vice President of Sales over Asia. Prior to joining Supertex, he held sales management and field applications positions at BAE Sales, Power Integrations, and Unitrode Corporation. Mr. DeGuzman holds a B.S. degree in Electrical Engineering from University of California at Los Angeles and an M.S. degree in Electrical Engineering from University of Southern California. Mr. DeGuzman replaces Ahmed Masood who resigned last week.

Read the full article →

Stellar Biotechnologies Appoints John S. Sundsmo, Ph.D. to VP, Research & IP Management and Daniel C. Adelman, M.D. as Member of SAB

June 29, 2010

PORT HUENEME, CA–(Marketwire – June 29, 2010) –   Stellar Biotechnologies, Inc. ( PINKSHEETS : SBOTF ) ( TSX-V : KLH ) has appointed John S. Sundsmo, Ph.D., VP – Research & Intellectual Property Management and Daniel C. Adelman, M.D. as a member of the Scientific Advisory Board.

Read the full article →

Stellar Biotechnologies Appoints John S. Sundsmo, Ph.D. to VP, Research & IP Management and Daniel C. Adelman, M.D. as Member of SAB

June 29, 2010

PORT HUENEME, CA–(Marketwire – June 29, 2010) –   Stellar Biotechnologies, Inc. ( PINKSHEETS : SBOTF ) ( TSX-V : KLH ) has appointed John S. Sundsmo, Ph.D., VP – Research & Intellectual Property Management and Daniel C. Adelman, M.D. as a member of the Scientific Advisory Board.

Read the full article →

Banks, Financial Firms May Have Until 2022 To Comply With Volcker Rule In Wall Street Bill

June 29, 2010

Goldman Sachs Group Inc. and Citigroup Inc. are among U.S. banks that may have as long as a dozen years to cut stakes in in-house hedge funds and private- equity units under a regulatory revamp agreed to last week.

Read the full article →

Jack Myers: 2010 Broadcast and Cable Network TV Upfront Marketplace Returns to 2008 Level

June 29, 2010

Myers National Television 2010/2011 Upfront Marketplace Report

Read the full article →

Rogerscasey Names Adam Tosh New Managing Director, Investment Solutions

June 29, 2010

New Hire Continues Momentum of Maintaining a World-Class Team to Help Investment Clients Stay Ahead of Economic Trends and to Deliver Unparalleled Insight to Achieve Results

Read the full article →

Rogerscasey Names Adam Tosh New Managing Director, Investment Solutions

June 29, 2010

New Hire Continues Momentum of Maintaining a World-Class Team to Help Investment Clients Stay Ahead of Economic Trends and to Deliver Unparalleled Insight to Achieve Results

Read the full article →

Venda Names Ron Brien Vice President, Alliances & Marketing, Americas

June 29, 2010

Leading On-Demand eCommerce Provider Hires High-Growth SaaS Sales and Marketing Veteran to Head Strategic Initiatives

Read the full article →

Venda Names Ron Brien Vice President, Alliances & Marketing, Americas

June 29, 2010

Leading On-Demand eCommerce Provider Hires High-Growth SaaS Sales and Marketing Veteran to Head Strategic Initiatives

Read the full article →

uTest Adds Jim Savage to Its Board of Directors

June 29, 2010

Longworth Co-Founder Brings Wealth of Experience With High-Growth Web & Digital Media Startups

Read the full article →

uTest Adds Jim Savage to Its Board of Directors

June 29, 2010

Longworth Co-Founder Brings Wealth of Experience With High-Growth Web & Digital Media Startups

Read the full article →

Video: Musk’s Tesla Begins Trading Today After $226 Million IPO: Video

June 29, 2010

June 29 (Bloomberg) — Bloomberg’s Betty Liu reports on major newsmakers in today’s Movers & Shakers. (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Video: Wilbur Ross Discusses Assured Guaranty, State Budgets: Video

June 29, 2010

June 29 (Bloomberg) — Billionaire investor Wilbur Ross, chairman of WL Ross & Co., talks about state budgets, the municipal bond market and his stake in bond insurer Assured Guaranty Ltd. Ross speaks with Deirdre Bolton on Bloomberg Television’s “InsideTrack.” (This is an excerpt of the full interview. Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Video: Yormark Says Nets to Use New Arena, Coach to Woo LeBron: Video

June 29, 2010

June 29 (Bloomberg) — Brett Yormark, chief executive officer of the New Jersey Nets, says there isn’t a “silver bullet” to attract free agents but a combination of factors that will help the team recruit players like LeBron James. Bloomberg’s Michele Steele reports. (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Significant Chinese Steel Producer To Take 34% Stake In Dynasty Metals Australia Limited (ASX:DMA)

June 29, 2010

Significant Chinese Steel Producer To Take 34% Stake In Dynasty Metals Australia Limited (ASX:DMA)

Read the full article →

Australian Market Report of June 30, 2010

June 29, 2010

Australian Market Report of June 30, 2010

Read the full article →

328Mt Iron Ore Mineral Resource Reported At Iron Road Limited (ASX:IRD) Central Eyre Iron Project In South Australia

June 29, 2010

328Mt Iron Ore Mineral Resource Reported At Iron Road Limited (ASX:IRD) Central Eyre Iron Project In South Australia

Read the full article →

Burleson Energy Limited (ASX:BUR) Joann #1 Well Logging Completed And Moeller #1 Well Testing Commenced At Wilcox Drilling Program

June 29, 2010

Burleson Energy Limited (ASX:BUR) Joann #1 Well Logging Completed And Moeller #1 Well Testing Commenced At Wilcox Drilling Program

Read the full article →

Confidence in euro zone beats estimates

June 29, 2010

Confidence in euro zone beats estimates

Read the full article →

European stocks drop on Chinese growth concerns

June 29, 2010

European stocks drop on Chinese growth concerns

Read the full article →

Swiss Market Index declines at midday trading

June 29, 2010

Swiss Market Index declines at midday trading

Read the full article →

DJ STOXX shed points ahead of US data

June 29, 2010

DJ STOXX shed points ahead of US data

Read the full article →

Investors confirm their short positions

June 29, 2010

Investors confirm their short positions

Read the full article →

Dollar Gains as Investors Head for Safety

June 29, 2010

Dollar Gains as Investors Head for Safety

Read the full article →

Majors tumble on economic recovery fears

June 29, 2010

Majors tumble on economic recovery fears

Read the full article →

Dollars Strength Most Prominent against a Weak Euro as Spending Rises, Activity Dulls

June 29, 2010

Dollar’s Strength Most Prominent against a Weak Euro as Spending Rises, Activity Dulls

Read the full article →

Stock, Commodity Positioning Hints US Dollar to Decline

June 29, 2010

Stock, Commodity Positioning Hints US Dollar to Decline

Read the full article →