August 2010

Liz Ryan: Resume Gaps, Blemishes, & Career Shifts: Yikes!

August 24, 2010

Job-seekers have a lot on their minds, but I don’t know of anything that worries job-hunters more than resume gaps and blemishes. You know what I’m talking about, I’ll bet. A resume gap causes job-seekers a lot of sleepness nights, and I don’t blame them. HR screeners and even hiring managers can have bizarre, paranoid reactions to resume gaps. For some reason, people see a gap in employment and they can only imagine two possibilities. Either the job-seeker was in prison during those missing years, or s/he was training with Al Qaeda. It’s really strange. There are other resume blemishes, apart from gaps. An unexpected shift in career direction needs some explanation. Moves into and out of corporate jobs (and moves in or out of consulting) can throw screeners for a loop, too. We’ll be addressing these resume issues and gazillions more in a free teleseminar on Wednesday, September 1, 2010 at seven p.m. Mountain time. The teleseminar will be presented by Glassdoo r, a very cool company salary-and-culture research site. Here are the details . Hope you can join us on September first! It will be fun.

Read the full article →

Liz Ryan: Resume Gaps, Blemishes, & Career Shifts: Yikes!

August 24, 2010

Job-seekers have a lot on their minds, but I don’t know of anything that worries job-hunters more than resume gaps and blemishes. You know what I’m talking about, I’ll bet. A resume gap causes job-seekers a lot of sleepness nights, and I don’t blame them. HR screeners and even hiring managers can have bizarre, paranoid reactions to resume gaps. For some reason, people see a gap in employment and they can only imagine two possibilities. Either the job-seeker was in prison during those missing years, or s/he was training with Al Qaeda. It’s really strange. There are other resume blemishes, apart from gaps. An unexpected shift in career direction needs some explanation. Moves into and out of corporate jobs (and moves in or out of consulting) can throw screeners for a loop, too. We’ll be addressing these resume issues and gazillions more in a free teleseminar on Wednesday, September 1, 2010 at seven p.m. Mountain time. The teleseminar will be presented by Glassdoo r, a very cool company salary-and-culture research site. Here are the details . Hope you can join us on September first! It will be fun.

Read the full article →

David Meerman Scott: Marketing Lessons from the Grateful Dead

August 24, 2010

We’re seeing an incredible revival of the 60s movement in modern day marketing. It’s no longer enough as a marketer to just come up with a good tag line, spend money on advertising, and hope the consumer minions bite. Shiny new toys don’t always win the day, instead consumers are looking for real connection. While Brian Halligan and I were researching and writing our new book Marketing Lessons from the Grateful Dead: What Every Business Can Learn From the Most Iconic Band in History , we found the masses online are eager to feel a part of a bigger community and want to be fans of companies they do business with. But how can marketers not only reach out to their particular fan base, but also inspire them to become like the Deadheads are to the Dead? As marketers, your goal is to spread the word about your product or service in the marketplace. Twenty years ago, the friction in the marketplace was high. To overcome this friction, you spent money on PR firms and on expensive advertising campaigns. Today the friction in the marketplace against getting your product known is much, much less. If you have a remarkable idea, you will attract bloggers and social media enthusiasts in your marketplace that will propel your idea without spending lots of money on PR and advertising. Like the Grateful Dead , you can set your content free and watch your fans and followers spread it far and wide. Learn from the music industry mistakes. Share freely and early and don’t place barriers that will keep your fans on the outside. The 60s saw a powerful wave of music and recently we’ve seen the downturn as the music industry focused solely on the bottom line instead of building a powerful fan base. The fans revolted and found ways to express their distaste for the industry through their pocketbooks. The music industry put strict barriers around artists’ content, and that battle continues. In contrast, the Grateful Dead shared their music freely with their fans (by allowing people to record concerts). Even to this day in the surviving members’ side projects such as Furthur (Bob Weir and Phil Lesh) and the Rhythm Devils (Bill Kreutzmann and Mickey Hart) encourage fans to record shows and by sharing and the base continues to grow and impact new generations of fans. Setting their music free only fueled their success as Deadheads spread their music far and wide. The more concerts the Grateful Dead performed, the more tapes were in the marketplace. The more copies were made of tapes, the more advertisements were in the marketplace pulling in new customers. It’s not just the Grateful Dead and it’s not just the music industry that can use these techniques. For example, MySQL , an open source, database management system used by companies all over the globe, was built at a time when the big competitors dominated the industry with paid, closed source software. Rather than try and compete with the likes of Microsoft and Oracle, MySQL gave away their product and made their money in other ways. The Grateful Dead teaches us that making it easy for our audience to spread our content makes our product known in the marketplace. Every market is competitive, especially online. Winners are those who make it as easy as possible for people to spread ideas through Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, YouTube, StumbleUpon, Digg, and other social networking sites. The demand for remarkable raises the bar for marketers and PR agencies who have to unlearn what they’ve learned and to not just “market to” a potential customer base, but rather “market with” fans. The 60s were all about the freedom of expression and to build and create a long-term fan base amidst all the marketing messaging out there, you’re going to have think more like the Grateful Dead (and do more dancing)!

Read the full article →

Kelsey Timmerman: 5 Reasons American Apparel Is on the Path to Bankruptcy

August 24, 2010

From the Financial Post ‘s story American Apparel a hipster darling no more as bankruptcy looms : “Dov Charney is at the moment of truth,” said Howard Davidowitz, chairman of Davidowitz & Associates Inc., a national retail consulting and investment banking firm based in New York City. “And all roads for him lead to hell. He’s got to pick the best of the worst choices.” Dov Charney is the controversial CEO of American Apparel , the US’s largest remaining apparel manufacturer. Dov is reportedly very hands on when it comes to clothes and, reportedly his female workers . I wrote about AA in my book Where Am I Wearing? as an option for engaged consumers who are looking to support American-made products. But recently the company’s stock has fallen lower than the necklines of their T-shirts — 66%. It’s doubtful that the brand will go away, but it sounds like they might be in for a restructuring and that likely means Dov will have to go away. This is a shame. Despite his alleged transgressions, I hate seeing someone forced from doing the something that they love. That said, why is American Apparel in this position? Here are five reasons: 1) Sex Sells except when it doesn’t No company has taken the advertising mantra “sex sells” to the level of American Apparel. I mean really, does anything say “come shop here and you’ll get laid” more than this? American Apparel sells T-shirts, socks, and everything in between, but most of their ads feature women barely wearing anything. I’ve never seen a copy of their catalog, likely because they are stuffed beneath the mattresses of every 13 year-old boy from here to Tuscaloosa. If men bought and wore pantyhose, this ad alone would keep them out of bankruptcy. Unfortunately, women buy pantyhose. The fact that their ads are oversexed (and Dov, the face and crotch of American Apparel is too) could have contributed to their decline. 2) Don’t mess with Woody Allen AA ran an ad with Woody Allen in it without his permission. Allen sued and won. Now AA is breathing it’s last breath. Woody Allen is still doing fine. Just saying… 3) A referendum on mustaches Need I say more? 4) Garment workers aren’t supposed to be paid a decent wage Last year AA had to layoff 1,500 workers under threat of a raid by the federal government to investigate claims of illegal immigrants working. Illegal or not, the workers were paid a respectable wage with respectable benefits. American Apparel workers made American Apparel products. This is something unheard of today. There’s no such thing as a GAP garment maker. The folks who make GAP work for some other factory in faraway places. Maybe it’s economically impossible for a brand to actually make something other than a commercial in today’s market. 5) Too cool for school I own two of their collared shirts and a few of their T-shirts. However, much of what they make is too cool, too fushcia, too (dare I say) ball hugging for me. I don’t know a single guy that owns a pair of pink pants, let alone pink briefs. — Which if any of the above factors played a roll in American Apparel’s troubles? I can’t say. Regardless, we live in a world where engaged consumers have limited options already. The loss of American Apparel would limit them even further.

Read the full article →

Kelsey Timmerman: 5 Reasons American Apparel Is on the Path to Bankruptcy

August 24, 2010

From the Financial Post ‘s story American Apparel a hipster darling no more as bankruptcy looms : “Dov Charney is at the moment of truth,” said Howard Davidowitz, chairman of Davidowitz & Associates Inc., a national retail consulting and investment banking firm based in New York City. “And all roads for him lead to hell. He’s got to pick the best of the worst choices.” Dov Charney is the controversial CEO of American Apparel , the US’s largest remaining apparel manufacturer. Dov is reportedly very hands on when it comes to clothes and, reportedly his female workers . I wrote about AA in my book Where Am I Wearing? as an option for engaged consumers who are looking to support American-made products. But recently the company’s stock has fallen lower than the necklines of their T-shirts — 66%. It’s doubtful that the brand will go away, but it sounds like they might be in for a restructuring and that likely means Dov will have to go away. This is a shame. Despite his alleged transgressions, I hate seeing someone forced from doing the something that they love. That said, why is American Apparel in this position? Here are five reasons: 1) Sex Sells except when it doesn’t No company has taken the advertising mantra “sex sells” to the level of American Apparel. I mean really, does anything say “come shop here and you’ll get laid” more than this? American Apparel sells T-shirts, socks, and everything in between, but most of their ads feature women barely wearing anything. I’ve never seen a copy of their catalog, likely because they are stuffed beneath the mattresses of every 13 year-old boy from here to Tuscaloosa. If men bought and wore pantyhose, this ad alone would keep them out of bankruptcy. Unfortunately, women buy pantyhose. The fact that their ads are oversexed (and Dov, the face and crotch of American Apparel is too) could have contributed to their decline. 2) Don’t mess with Woody Allen AA ran an ad with Woody Allen in it without his permission. Allen sued and won. Now AA is breathing it’s last breath. Woody Allen is still doing fine. Just saying… 3) A referendum on mustaches Need I say more? 4) Garment workers aren’t supposed to be paid a decent wage Last year AA had to layoff 1,500 workers under threat of a raid by the federal government to investigate claims of illegal immigrants working. Illegal or not, the workers were paid a respectable wage with respectable benefits. American Apparel workers made American Apparel products. This is something unheard of today. There’s no such thing as a GAP garment maker. The folks who make GAP work for some other factory in faraway places. Maybe it’s economically impossible for a brand to actually make something other than a commercial in today’s market. 5) Too cool for school I own two of their collared shirts and a few of their T-shirts. However, much of what they make is too cool, too fushcia, too (dare I say) ball hugging for me. I don’t know a single guy that owns a pair of pink pants, let alone pink briefs. — Which if any of the above factors played a roll in American Apparel’s troubles? I can’t say. Regardless, we live in a world where engaged consumers have limited options already. The loss of American Apparel would limit them even further.

Read the full article →

Kelsey Timmerman: 5 Reasons American Apparel Is on the Path to Bankruptcy

August 24, 2010

From the Financial Post ‘s story American Apparel a hipster darling no more as bankruptcy looms : “Dov Charney is at the moment of truth,” said Howard Davidowitz, chairman of Davidowitz & Associates Inc., a national retail consulting and investment banking firm based in New York City. “And all roads for him lead to hell. He’s got to pick the best of the worst choices.” Dov Charney is the controversial CEO of American Apparel , the US’s largest remaining apparel manufacturer. Dov is reportedly very hands on when it comes to clothes and, reportedly his female workers . I wrote about AA in my book Where Am I Wearing? as an option for engaged consumers who are looking to support American-made products. But recently the company’s stock has fallen lower than the necklines of their T-shirts — 66%. It’s doubtful that the brand will go away, but it sounds like they might be in for a restructuring and that likely means Dov will have to go away. This is a shame. Despite his alleged transgressions, I hate seeing someone forced from doing the something that they love. That said, why is American Apparel in this position? Here are five reasons: 1) Sex Sells except when it doesn’t No company has taken the advertising mantra “sex sells” to the level of American Apparel. I mean really, does anything say “come shop here and you’ll get laid” more than this? American Apparel sells T-shirts, socks, and everything in between, but most of their ads feature women barely wearing anything. I’ve never seen a copy of their catalog, likely because they are stuffed beneath the mattresses of every 13 year-old boy from here to Tuscaloosa. If men bought and wore pantyhose, this ad alone would keep them out of bankruptcy. Unfortunately, women buy pantyhose. The fact that their ads are oversexed (and Dov, the face and crotch of American Apparel is too) could have contributed to their decline. 2) Don’t mess with Woody Allen AA ran an ad with Woody Allen in it without his permission. Allen sued and won. Now AA is breathing it’s last breath. Woody Allen is still doing fine. Just saying… 3) A referendum on mustaches Need I say more? 4) Garment workers aren’t supposed to be paid a decent wage Last year AA had to layoff 1,500 workers under threat of a raid by the federal government to investigate claims of illegal immigrants working. Illegal or not, the workers were paid a respectable wage with respectable benefits. American Apparel workers made American Apparel products. This is something unheard of today. There’s no such thing as a GAP garment maker. The folks who make GAP work for some other factory in faraway places. Maybe it’s economically impossible for a brand to actually make something other than a commercial in today’s market. 5) Too cool for school I own two of their collared shirts and a few of their T-shirts. However, much of what they make is too cool, too fushcia, too (dare I say) ball hugging for me. I don’t know a single guy that owns a pair of pink pants, let alone pink briefs. — Which if any of the above factors played a roll in American Apparel’s troubles? I can’t say. Regardless, we live in a world where engaged consumers have limited options already. The loss of American Apparel would limit them even further.

Read the full article →

Kelsey Timmerman: 5 Reasons American Apparel Is on the Path to Bankruptcy

August 24, 2010

From the Financial Post ‘s story American Apparel a hipster darling no more as bankruptcy looms : “Dov Charney is at the moment of truth,” said Howard Davidowitz, chairman of Davidowitz & Associates Inc., a national retail consulting and investment banking firm based in New York City. “And all roads for him lead to hell. He’s got to pick the best of the worst choices.” Dov Charney is the controversial CEO of American Apparel , the US’s largest remaining apparel manufacturer. Dov is reportedly very hands on when it comes to clothes and, reportedly his female workers . I wrote about AA in my book Where Am I Wearing? as an option for engaged consumers who are looking to support American-made products. But recently the company’s stock has fallen lower than the necklines of their T-shirts — 66%. It’s doubtful that the brand will go away, but it sounds like they might be in for a restructuring and that likely means Dov will have to go away. This is a shame. Despite his alleged transgressions, I hate seeing someone forced from doing the something that they love. That said, why is American Apparel in this position? Here are five reasons: 1) Sex Sells except when it doesn’t No company has taken the advertising mantra “sex sells” to the level of American Apparel. I mean really, does anything say “come shop here and you’ll get laid” more than this? American Apparel sells T-shirts, socks, and everything in between, but most of their ads feature women barely wearing anything. I’ve never seen a copy of their catalog, likely because they are stuffed beneath the mattresses of every 13 year-old boy from here to Tuscaloosa. If men bought and wore pantyhose, this ad alone would keep them out of bankruptcy. Unfortunately, women buy pantyhose. The fact that their ads are oversexed (and Dov, the face and crotch of American Apparel is too) could have contributed to their decline. 2) Don’t mess with Woody Allen AA ran an ad with Woody Allen in it without his permission. Allen sued and won. Now AA is breathing it’s last breath. Woody Allen is still doing fine. Just saying… 3) A referendum on mustaches Need I say more? 4) Garment workers aren’t supposed to be paid a decent wage Last year AA had to layoff 1,500 workers under threat of a raid by the federal government to investigate claims of illegal immigrants working. Illegal or not, the workers were paid a respectable wage with respectable benefits. American Apparel workers made American Apparel products. This is something unheard of today. There’s no such thing as a GAP garment maker. The folks who make GAP work for some other factory in faraway places. Maybe it’s economically impossible for a brand to actually make something other than a commercial in today’s market. 5) Too cool for school I own two of their collared shirts and a few of their T-shirts. However, much of what they make is too cool, too fushcia, too (dare I say) ball hugging for me. I don’t know a single guy that owns a pair of pink pants, let alone pink briefs. — Which if any of the above factors played a roll in American Apparel’s troubles? I can’t say. Regardless, we live in a world where engaged consumers have limited options already. The loss of American Apparel would limit them even further.

Read the full article →

Video: Axiom’s Dalton Discusses U.S. Stocks, Federal Stimulus: Video

August 24, 2010

Aug. 24 (Bloomberg) — Liam Dalton, chief executive officer of Axiom Capital Management, talks about the outlook for U.S. stocks and the possibility that the government may enact further economic stimulus measures. Dalton talks with Matt Miller on Bloomberg Television’s “Street Smart.” (This is an excerpt of the full interview. Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Jonathan A. Schein: Why Beat Up a Fish Hatchery’s Solar Panels?

August 24, 2010

Last week, Roger Meiners, a senior fellow a the Property and Environmental Center in Bozeman, MT and a professor of economics at the University of Texas, Arlington wrote an op-ed piece in the Wall Street Journal proclaiming the federal stimulus program directed at creating green jobs to be a “turkey.” Meiners’ reasoning is based on the cost of installing solar panels at the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s Ennis National Fish Hatchery at a cost of $179,000–all paid for by stimulus money. According to Meiners, the solar panels may have a total life of 25 to possibly 40 years with the actual return on the investment taking closer to 70 years. He bases this claim on the fact that the fish hatchery requires 34,000 kilowatt hours per year, priced at $.10 per kilowatt, so the cost of energy needed to run the fish hatchery is $3,400 per year. The solar panels will generate 75% of the energy needed, for a savings of $2,550 annually. Therefore, Meiners reasons, if the panels last 40 years, they will save the hatchery approximately $102,000, leaving the remaining cost of $77,000 unfunded. In other words, this difference will have to be made up by the taxpayer. Let’s look at the actual economics of this. If the hatchery chose to place $2,550 per year in a savings account, accruing an average of 3% per annum for the next 25 years, the shortfall of $77,000 would be made up. That solution may seem simple, perhaps too simple for a professor of economics to understand that any savings will be ultimately be spent somewhere else and create additional stimulus. This may be Keynesian economics in its rawest form, but it’s relevant to this discussion. Meiners is also assuming that everything remains exactly the same for the next 70 years–that development of newer and more efficient solar panels will not happen, and that the replacement costs for those will not decrease over time. But if this were the case, all home computers would still cost thousands of dollars and we’d still be listening to music on $200 Sony Walkmans. So Meiners’ argument leaves absolutely no room for advancement. Perhaps the result of another stimulus package from the past–the building of the Fort Peck Dam project in northeast Montana–makes a good counterpoint to Meiners’ point of view. Built during the Great Depression (1933-1936) as a result of the Public Works Administration, Fort Peck Dam’s creation employed over 10,000 Montanans during the worst economic period in American history and made history–it is the largest hydraulically filled dam in the United States. Today Fort Peck Dam generates 185,000 kilowatts of energy every year. Just as there are today, there were probably many Depression-era naysayers who believed the dam’s building was just another federal government giveaway that would spend us all into oblivion. However, although there were problems with the dam’s construction, it’s still working pretty well after 70 years. And when it comes to the Ennis National Fish Hatchery, we are, once again, looking 70 years into a future that we cannot possibly foresee. If the past is any indication, perhaps we still have a chance to make it through. Meiners complains that “our great grandchildren will pay for it, since this piddly little project is part of the trillion-dollar deficit that we are unloading on future generations.” It’s obvious that, in general, Meiners does not agree with the Obama administration’s stimulus program. Fair enough. Certainly discussing the stimulus program’s potential flaws is worthwhile. However, it’s surprising that such an accomplished professor as Meiners would rely on such reductionist and cynical hyperbole to make his points. Jonathan A. Schein is CEO of ScheinMedia and publisher of MetroGreenBusiness.com

Read the full article →

Video: Anderson Says California Must Protect Taxpayer from IOUs: Video

August 24, 2010

Aug. 24 (Bloomberg) — California State Assemblyman Joel Anderson talks with Bloomberg’s Melissa Long about a bill that would allow California IOUs to be used to pay fees and taxes owed to the government. The need for the IOUs arose because a legislative logjam over how to erase a $19 billion deficit has prevented passage of a budget. The state will use the chits for everything from supplies to contracted services and health-care costs so it can make payments on priority items such as bonds. (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

SBA’s Katrina Loans Criticized For Mismanagement, Bias, ‘No Compassion’

August 24, 2010

CHALMETTE, La. — Five years after Hurricane Katrina, Jay Young is still haunted by the desperate voices on the other end of the telephone crying and begging for help. As a loan officer for a federal agency that was supposed to help homeowners and businesses get back on their feet, he had high expectations he could make a difference. But he recalls how he was forced to turn away many qualified applicants because of what he says was pressure from his supervisors to close files quickly. Karen Bazile remembers having high hopes, too, when she applied for a loan from the same agency, the Small Business Administration, to rebuild her home in the New Orleans suburb of Chalmette. While she ultimately got the money, she quickly lost faith as she struggled with different loan officers who misplaced her paperwork and told her she had only 48 hours to find and fax critical documents or her application would be canceled. ___ EDITOR’S NOTE: This story was reported by Associated Press writers Mitch Weiss, Michael Kunzelman, Holbrook Mohr, Cain Burdeau, Troy Thibodeaux and Jason Bronis. It was written by Weiss. ___ Some 160 miles to the east, in Alabama, Erik Schmitz, former commodore of the Fairhope Yacht Club, takes in a breathtaking view of Mobile Bay from a posh new clubhouse rebuilt in part with a $1.5 million disaster loan, the maximum from the SBA. For Schmitz, the entire loan process was smooth sailing. While stories of the Federal Emergency Management Agency’s contaminated trailers and the Army Corps of Engineers’ inability to shore up the levees captured the headlines in the aftermath of the deadly storms of 2005, the bungling of the SBA, the lead federal agency helping people rebuild their homes and businesses, has largely been untold. The sagas of Schmitz, Bazile and the SBA’s Young, who worked out of the agency’s massive loan processing center in Fort Worth, Texas, collectively reveal how the SBA failed in so many ways, an ominous experience as the agency prepares to play a similar role in the aftermath of the massive BP PLC oil spill. These are stories of a mismanaged bureaucracy that still hurt half a decade later: tales of applications for low-interest disaster loans that should have been approved but were not, of applications deleted from the SBA computer system for no valid reason, of impossible-to-meet deadlines manufactured to clear backlogs, and of a process so chaotic and painful that thousands simply gave up. An Associated Press investigation based on more than 200 interviews, thousands of pages of public documents obtained under the federal Freedom of Information Act and a first-ever detailed computer analysis of SBA data from hurricanes Katrina and Rita found that: _ Despite the obvious need, 55 percent of homeowners and businesses that applied for help after the hurricanes were turned away. According to data provided by SBA, of 318,953 applications processed, 175,463 were rejected and 143,490 were approved. _ Only 60 percent of the loan money approved by SBA ultimately reached applicants. Over the years, SBA officials have told congressional committees that the agency had approved more than $10 billion in loans, touting it as an example of how SBA had helped those on the Gulf Coast. However, according to the data, only $6.1 billion of the approved loan money has been dispensed. SBA officials say many applicants never accepted the loans because they found other ways to rebuild, including using insurance money. But many former applicants said in interviews that they just walked away because the entire process took too long and was too complicated. _ Of the money SBA did distribute, $357 million – nearly 6 percent – has never been repaid. More than a dozen people whose loans were charged off told the AP that the agency hasn’t contacted them about repayment. _ Country clubs, yacht clubs, exclusive private schools and megachurches received millions in loans from the agency founded in 1953 with a mission to “aid, counsel, assist and protect the interests of small business concerns.” Some of the more substantial operations rebuilt bigger and better, often contradicting SBA rules that say damaged buildings should be repaired only to their original state. _ Homeowners and businesses in higher-income areas were more likely to get a loan than those in lower-income areas, according to AP’s analysis of SBA data by ZIP code. “The truth is that only the wealthy moved through the system easily,” said Gale Martin, another former SBA loan officer. “If you were of a certain income, we funded you first, which is not the way the system is supposed to work.” Martin contended that contrary to the SBA mission to especially help people who didn’t always have the means to rebuild, applicants with higher credit scores and bigger incomes were cherry-picked for processing first because those files could be closed quicker. _ A disparity also existed along racial lines. For example, the predominantly white, wealthier Lakeview section of New Orleans had the city’s highest ratio of approvals to rejections, while the lowest approval rates were in poorer, mostly black areas like the Lower 9th Ward. But a racial disparity was clear even among economically similar areas. SBA approved nearly 66 percent of loan applications in a predominantly white part of suburban St. Bernard Parish but approved only 42.1 percent in a predominantly black, adjacent section of eastern New Orleans with comparable median household income. SBA officials said they don’t collect information about race on loan applications, but try to reach out to applicants in poor neighborhoods. Civil rights leaders say the agency hasn’t done enough to help. SBA officials insist the agency today is better prepared to handle a major disaster. “We’re not proud of what happened during the 2005 Gulf Coast hurricanes,” said James Rivera, deputy associate administrator of SBA’s office of disaster assistance. “Our response was slow, but we’ve learned from our mistakes. We’ve had five years to reflect on this.” During that period, agency officials say, they have added staff, improved technology and simplified the loan process to push money out quickly to disaster victims. But recent reports by government watchdog groups and some critics have slammed SBA for being too slow to implement measures that could improve an agency with a troubled past. Congressional investigators and SBA whistleblowers question whether the agency is any better equipped for a major disaster today, as the region grapples with the oil-spill related assault on three pillars of its economy – seafood, tourism and offshore drilling. The SBA is once again setting up disaster recovery centers along the Gulf Coast, although the oil spill effort will likely be overshadowed by the hurricanes’ economic toll. While BP is responsible for the financial impact caused by the spill, the SBA is helping people while they wait for the corporate assistance. “This is going to happen again – tomorrow – if there’s another Katrina,” Martin said. “They didn’t fix enough for it not to happen.” ___ Images of New Orleanians trapped inside the Superdome without food and water, or desperately waiting on rooftops for help, haunted Americans in September 2005. Police officers walked off the job, looters ransacked downtown shops, and critics scolded the Bush administration for being too slow to respond. Meanwhile, a different kind of chaos was unfolding inside the SBA. A new computer system that was supposed to speed and simplify the loan process crashed time and again, resulting in massive delays. But that wasn’t the only problem. “There were lots of people sitting around not doing anything with thousands of applications pouring in everyday,” said Brad Durtschi, a former SBA loan officer who now works for FEMA. In the years leading up to the storms, the agency’s staff had been cut. When Katrina hit, followed by Rita about three weeks later, SBA had only 880 employees to process hundreds of thousands of loan applications, including 190 loan officers working at the Fort Worth center. SBA scrambled to hire several thousand additional staffers, many to work in Texas, where loan applications filed in dozens of makeshift disaster recovery centers along the Gulf Coast were sent for processing. The new loan officers – many from the private sector, with no loan processing experience – were rushed into service and expected to navigate a complex set of rules and regulations. It was bedlam, Durtschi said. The loan applications piled up, and the phones rang and rang. People wanted to know if their application had been approved, and when they would receive money to help reopen their business or rebuild their home. At one point, officers were told by supervisors not to answer phones because the questions were taking up too much time, former loan officers and supervisors told the AP. By December 2005, the system was gridlocked. Hundreds of thousands of applications were sitting in computer queues awaiting processing. And the phone calls turned from inquisitive to frustrated to angry. “People called in everyday crying and begging,” Martin said. “We were forced to do things that were wrong.” With congressional pressure mounting to turn loans around more quickly, the agency began using new methods to clear the backlog that had little to do with helping people get loans, former loan officers and supervisors said. Supervisors would reject applications if a single sheet of paper or signature was out of place. In the first four months following Katrina and Rita, the agency rejected more loans than it approved, according to an AP analysis. Loan officers were required to process up to twice as many applications per day. When one landed on their desk, a loan officer had to try three times within 24 hours to reach the potential borrower by telephone. If they didn’t, the loan was either declined or indefinitely shelved. If shelved, the loan application was effectively canceled and a letter was generated saying the applicant had 60 days to reapply. But many times, the loan officers, under pressure to reach quotas, would call only once or not at all, then withdraw or decline the application, the former loan workers said. They and their supervisors described computer queues clogged with tens of thousands of loan applications, and of overwhelmed employees being told to put efficiency above all else and callously dismiss the pleas of desperate people. “People were homeless, living in their cars,” said Young, now a bank loan officer. “People were running out of rental assistance. They didn’t have a place to go. They had worn out their favors with their families. And they needed to move on. And they would call and ask: ‘Could you please do anything you can to help us?’” “I couldn’t sleep,” he said. “I knew it wasn’t right.” Said Durtschi: “We had no compassion for these people. To our supervisors, it was all about production and we hurt a lot of people along the way.” A 2007 report from the SBA’s Office of the Inspector General, which performs independent reviews and audits of the agency, criticized SBA for canceling pending approved loans without warning. During one period in 2006, the report said, the agency’s Buffalo, N.Y., call center terminated 7,752 pending loans without notifying borrowers in advance. In many cases, the investigators found, no call had ever been made to the applicant to begin final processing. If a loan officer did manage to reach a borrower, the applicant was given 48 hours to fax documents to bring the loan to the closing phase. Often, the borrower didn’t have all the paperwork readily available. “Maybe you need a deed and it’s at the courthouse, but the courthouse is under water. The documentation is destroyed,” said Young, the former SBA loan officer. “Or maybe you need payroll stubs, and that information is gone. Now you’re told you have 48 hours to get it. That’s even if we reach you by phone. We have your old phone number. Sometimes we call, sometimes we don’t.” When borrowers requested additional time, the agency was unyielding, Young said. “We never budged,” he said. “It was a manufactured deadline that put undue stress on people.” “At the end of the 48 hours, you’re wiped out from our queue,” he said. “You didn’t exist.” ___ When a borrower did find the critical documents and fax them to Fort Worth, the paperwork would often get lost. The office had only a few fax machines to handle the crush. Receipt of the documentation was assured only if a loan officer waited by the machine to snag the papers. Bazile remembers faxing 50- to 70-page packets two or three times before someone at the processing center would acknowledge receipt. “How could something like that get lost?” she wondered. “It was a constant frustration.” Plus, the documents contained personal information, such as Social Security and bank account numbers. Martin recalled once arguing unsuccessfully with her supervisor in favor of approving a loan for a small business owner and being told: “Don’t think about it. Move on.” “They were ruthless, absolutely ruthless,” Martin said of her bosses. “We weren’t there to help the public.” Those same supervisors often conducted contests with cash prizes to reward loan officers who cleared the most applications, usually by rejecting as many as possible. One supervisor told the AP she won $100 for exceeding production quotas. “I would hear loan officers laughing about the loans they turned down,” Young said. “The same people kept winning.” In recent weeks, the AP found more than two dozen of the same supervisors still working in the Fort Worth office. But all of the current supervisors reached by the AP declined to comment, saying the agency prohibited them from talking. Others recall that productivity was the mantra at staff meetings. At one, a supervisor explained to loan officers how to get people off the phone. Use an egg timer, he said. When it goes off, hang up. “Your performance was measured on the number of files you closed,” said Bill Russell, a former loan officer and certified public accountant. “It wasn’t long until people discovered that to meet the quota, the easiest thing to do was just to deny the loan.” One supervisor who spoke to the AP on condition of anonymity out of fear she would lose her job said that on weekends fellow supervisors and other managers would order pizza and just empty the queue of applications. The extra sessions were called “Signoff Sunday,” she said. “It was all about getting these loans out of the system to make it appear like we were clearing up the backlog and helping people. But we weren’t helping people. What we were doing was saving our own jobs.” SBA’s Rivera questioned whether supervisors pushed loans through without review. “Obviously when you have 4,250 employees, you’re going to have some disgruntled employees,” he said. He said loan officers had to meet strict production quotas in line with the private sector. If they didn’t, they could be let go. But it was another campaign that created even more chaos in Fort Worth. By fall 2006, more than a year after Katrina, loans were still not moving quickly enough, former workers recalled. So SBA began “90-in-45,” a campaign to remove 90,000 loan applications from the queue in just 45 days. “There was no real incentive to approve a loan,” Young said. When borrowers found out their applications had been canceled, they would often call pleading for another chance, he said, adding that his supervisors wouldn’t let him help. “It was heart wrenching,” he said, fighting back tears. “There were some nights that my wife would ask, ‘What’s wrong with you?’ I’d sit there alone at the table, late at night, staring into space. Some nights I was up to 3 in the morning and I had to be up at 6.” ___ Over the past year, AP reporters visited dozens of Gulf Coast communities, even going door-to-door in two neighborhoods – in Waveland, Miss., and Chalmette, La. with high concentrations of SBA loans that were approved but never disbursed. Time and again, on streets where recovery has been hard to come by and where tall untended grass and cracked concrete foundations stand as reminders that many more people used to live and work here, the stories were remarkably consistent: A nightmare of lost paperwork; sudden and onerous deadlines; uncooperative, even combative loan officers at the other end of the phone line. People in these communities are fiercely independent and wary of asking the government for help. Many said they did so because Katrina was so thoroughly destructive that they had no choice. But many of those who recalled their battles with SBA said they dreaded the possibility of having to ask the agency for help ever again. Scott Peterson is still angry about the months he spent fighting with the SBA for a loan to reopen his flooded seafood restaurant in Waveland, a quiet beach town on the Mississippi coast that was nearly wiped off the map. He was rejected twice for a loan to repair the S&B Bar and Grill – even though he believed he qualified. He reopened in 2006, but not before maxing out his credit cards and borrowing money from his parents to rebuild. He says he did the best he could, but some of the windows on his restaurant are still boarded up and the roof leaks. Peterson is hurting again in a new way, this time because the oil spill has made it hard to find the seafood that draws his customers. Despite his resentment and lack of faith in the SBA, he’s contemplating making another request for help. “It’s going to be something to see when I apply again,” he said, shaking his head while stirring a pot of chicken gumbo on his kitchen stove. Bazile remembers how she became so upset dealing with the SBA process that she had to seek medical assistance. “I had no idea how overwhelming it was going to be,” said Bazile, 44, a former newspaper reporter who now works in the St. Bernard Parish president’s office. “My blood pressure shot up. My cardiologist asked me to stay home for a week or so, and so I did, but the problems didn’t go away.” Dealing with the agency became a full-time job for Bazile, who lives on a street in Chalmette that saw one of the highest concentrations of SBA activity along the coast. She took a seven-week leave from her job at The Times-Picayune to contend with the mounds of paperwork and battery of phone calls it took to secure the money to rebuild her home. More than once, a loan officer gave her a 48-hour deadline – out of the blue – to provide a required document or risk having her file closed. Phone messages went unreturned, and faxes to SBA mysteriously went missing. “It caused incredible emotional distress on me,” said a tearful Bazile. “Many, many times my husband said, ‘Just let it go. Let it go. We’ll be all right.’ And we could have walked away. But, in the end, that low interest rate was the very key to the way we’re living right now. They owed it to us, and I wasn’t going to let somebody bully me out of it.” ___ Many SBA applicants along the Gulf Coast had left their flooded homes and businesses and were living in tents, government-issued trailers, or with family and friends – sometimes far from home. In many cases, SBA officials had encouraged them to apply for loans. Few of the more than 200 interviewed said they had a smooth ride. Hassie Howell, who owned six rental properties on the same street in Chalmette, was approved for a $300,000 loan to fix up all six. He repeatedly called SBA to find out when he would receive the money. But each time he called, he said, he was transferred to another loan officer who wanted even more paperwork before the money could be released. When he sent in the documents, there were “more unexplained delays.” “More excuses,” he said. In the meantime, he was losing money. Unable to wait any longer, Howell sold two properties elsewhere in Chalmette and used the proceeds to begin rebuilding the rental units. When SBA called nearly a year later and told him it was ready to disburse the $300,000, Howell felt it was too little, too late. “I didn’t want anything to do with them,” he said. Today, the street is plagued by omnipresent concrete slabs and vacant decrepit homes. A neighboring street is a tangle of empty, garbage-strewn lots and shoulder-high weeds. Five of his homes have tenants. The community was stable before Katrina, Howell said. Now it is transient. “If I had gotten the money early, we would have been up and others would have returned,” said Howell, who now lives in Baton Rouge, La. “The whole experience was a nightmare.” ___ From the Fairhope Yacht Club’s wraparound porch, Schmitz watches boats bob before a brilliant orange-and-pink sunset and describes how the old clubhouse, a rambling, one-story structure, was destroyed by Katrina. That left members with a choice: Restore the facility to its former specs or build a new multistory clubhouse with amenities that could attract new members. They chose the latter. The new club’s $4 million price tag includes an SBA loan of about $1.5 million. The facility is double the size of the old building, with a new restaurant and bar and a swimming pool that alone cost nearly $300,000. The Fairhope Yacht Club reopened in 2008; these days there’s a waiting list to join. “For us, Katrina was an opportunity to build something bigger and better,” said Schmitz, a short, thin former teacher who looked ready for a regatta, with his khaki shorts, white sneakers and red pullover shirt emblazoned with the yacht club’s logo – a blue and white striped flag with the club’s initials. The yacht club had enough insurance to rebuild without SBA money. But without the federal help there would have been no upgrade. “I don’t see anything wrong with that,” Schmitz said. Yet SBA regulations state that loan recipients should rebuild properties only to pre-storm conditions. “Any improvements beyond pre-disaster condition is upgrading, and is not eligible,” according to SBA regulations. “Our program is set up to return you to your pre-disaster condition,” said Jay MacKenna, an SBA spokesman. “So if you had a 1,000-square-foot mobile home and that was totally destroyed, we could help you replace your 1,000-square-foot mobile home. We would not be providing you money to go out and buy a 2,000-square-foot mobile home.” There are certain exceptions, but they have to be authorized on a case-by-case basis. For example, the agency will allow an upgrade if an applicant uses their own money or borrows from a private lender to pay for the extra improvements. But agency officials have to check whether the borrower has the ability to repay the SBA loan and “any other debts.” Borrowers don’t always tell SBA about the extra expenditures, though, and the agency doesn’t always check. Schmitz said the club didn’t ask SBA if it could upgrade. But it was no secret; everyone in the community knew they were building a bigger yacht club. He said he never saw anyone from the SBA visit while the clubhouse was under construction. “We just told them we needed the money to rebuild. It was quick and fast and we didn’t have any problems,” he said. “It was a wonderful experience.” Before the money was disbursed, the agency verified Fairhope “had injected sufficient funds into the project” to meet the guidelines, said SBA spokeswoman Carol Chastang. “There was no indication anywhere in the file that the yacht club upgraded their facilities using SBA disaster loan proceeds,” she said in an e-mail. But she also said the yacht club had “completed much of the rebuilding with insurance and outside funding by the time it applied for the SBA disaster loan.” “What does that tell you about how the entire process worked? Did they really need the money? This violates the spirit of the rules,” said Gale Martin, one of the former SBA loan officers. For his part, Schmitz said the club’s members helped navigate the loan through the system. “You have to understand that we have people from all walks of life,” he said. “We have lawyers. We’ve got people who – loan officers, and all this – who all knew pretty much the inside track on all this stuff, and they took care of it for us.” ___ Associated Press writers Brian Skoloff, Becky Bohrer, Carrie Osgood, Peter Prengaman and the AP News Research Center contributed to this story. ___ The AP National Investigative Team can be reached at investigate (at) ap.org

Read the full article →

SBA’s Katrina Loans Criticized For Mismanagement, Bias, ‘No Compassion’

August 24, 2010

CHALMETTE, La. — Five years after Hurricane Katrina, Jay Young is still haunted by the desperate voices on the other end of the telephone crying and begging for help. As a loan officer for a federal agency that was supposed to help homeowners and businesses get back on their feet, he had high expectations he could make a difference. But he recalls how he was forced to turn away many qualified applicants because of what he says was pressure from his supervisors to close files quickly. Karen Bazile remembers having high hopes, too, when she applied for a loan from the same agency, the Small Business Administration, to rebuild her home in the New Orleans suburb of Chalmette. While she ultimately got the money, she quickly lost faith as she struggled with different loan officers who misplaced her paperwork and told her she had only 48 hours to find and fax critical documents or her application would be canceled. ___ EDITOR’S NOTE: This story was reported by Associated Press writers Mitch Weiss, Michael Kunzelman, Holbrook Mohr, Cain Burdeau, Troy Thibodeaux and Jason Bronis. It was written by Weiss. ___ Some 160 miles to the east, in Alabama, Erik Schmitz, former commodore of the Fairhope Yacht Club, takes in a breathtaking view of Mobile Bay from a posh new clubhouse rebuilt in part with a $1.5 million disaster loan, the maximum from the SBA. For Schmitz, the entire loan process was smooth sailing. While stories of the Federal Emergency Management Agency’s contaminated trailers and the Army Corps of Engineers’ inability to shore up the levees captured the headlines in the aftermath of the deadly storms of 2005, the bungling of the SBA, the lead federal agency helping people rebuild their homes and businesses, has largely been untold. The sagas of Schmitz, Bazile and the SBA’s Young, who worked out of the agency’s massive loan processing center in Fort Worth, Texas, collectively reveal how the SBA failed in so many ways, an ominous experience as the agency prepares to play a similar role in the aftermath of the massive BP PLC oil spill. These are stories of a mismanaged bureaucracy that still hurt half a decade later: tales of applications for low-interest disaster loans that should have been approved but were not, of applications deleted from the SBA computer system for no valid reason, of impossible-to-meet deadlines manufactured to clear backlogs, and of a process so chaotic and painful that thousands simply gave up. An Associated Press investigation based on more than 200 interviews, thousands of pages of public documents obtained under the federal Freedom of Information Act and a first-ever detailed computer analysis of SBA data from hurricanes Katrina and Rita found that: _ Despite the obvious need, 55 percent of homeowners and businesses that applied for help after the hurricanes were turned away. According to data provided by SBA, of 318,953 applications processed, 175,463 were rejected and 143,490 were approved. _ Only 60 percent of the loan money approved by SBA ultimately reached applicants. Over the years, SBA officials have told congressional committees that the agency had approved more than $10 billion in loans, touting it as an example of how SBA had helped those on the Gulf Coast. However, according to the data, only $6.1 billion of the approved loan money has been dispensed. SBA officials say many applicants never accepted the loans because they found other ways to rebuild, including using insurance money. But many former applicants said in interviews that they just walked away because the entire process took too long and was too complicated. _ Of the money SBA did distribute, $357 million – nearly 6 percent – has never been repaid. More than a dozen people whose loans were charged off told the AP that the agency hasn’t contacted them about repayment. _ Country clubs, yacht clubs, exclusive private schools and megachurches received millions in loans from the agency founded in 1953 with a mission to “aid, counsel, assist and protect the interests of small business concerns.” Some of the more substantial operations rebuilt bigger and better, often contradicting SBA rules that say damaged buildings should be repaired only to their original state. _ Homeowners and businesses in higher-income areas were more likely to get a loan than those in lower-income areas, according to AP’s analysis of SBA data by ZIP code. “The truth is that only the wealthy moved through the system easily,” said Gale Martin, another former SBA loan officer. “If you were of a certain income, we funded you first, which is not the way the system is supposed to work.” Martin contended that contrary to the SBA mission to especially help people who didn’t always have the means to rebuild, applicants with higher credit scores and bigger incomes were cherry-picked for processing first because those files could be closed quicker. _ A disparity also existed along racial lines. For example, the predominantly white, wealthier Lakeview section of New Orleans had the city’s highest ratio of approvals to rejections, while the lowest approval rates were in poorer, mostly black areas like the Lower 9th Ward. But a racial disparity was clear even among economically similar areas. SBA approved nearly 66 percent of loan applications in a predominantly white part of suburban St. Bernard Parish but approved only 42.1 percent in a predominantly black, adjacent section of eastern New Orleans with comparable median household income. SBA officials said they don’t collect information about race on loan applications, but try to reach out to applicants in poor neighborhoods. Civil rights leaders say the agency hasn’t done enough to help. SBA officials insist the agency today is better prepared to handle a major disaster. “We’re not proud of what happened during the 2005 Gulf Coast hurricanes,” said James Rivera, deputy associate administrator of SBA’s office of disaster assistance. “Our response was slow, but we’ve learned from our mistakes. We’ve had five years to reflect on this.” During that period, agency officials say, they have added staff, improved technology and simplified the loan process to push money out quickly to disaster victims. But recent reports by government watchdog groups and some critics have slammed SBA for being too slow to implement measures that could improve an agency with a troubled past. Congressional investigators and SBA whistleblowers question whether the agency is any better equipped for a major disaster today, as the region grapples with the oil-spill related assault on three pillars of its economy – seafood, tourism and offshore drilling. The SBA is once again setting up disaster recovery centers along the Gulf Coast, although the oil spill effort will likely be overshadowed by the hurricanes’ economic toll. While BP is responsible for the financial impact caused by the spill, the SBA is helping people while they wait for the corporate assistance. “This is going to happen again – tomorrow – if there’s another Katrina,” Martin said. “They didn’t fix enough for it not to happen.” ___ Images of New Orleanians trapped inside the Superdome without food and water, or desperately waiting on rooftops for help, haunted Americans in September 2005. Police officers walked off the job, looters ransacked downtown shops, and critics scolded the Bush administration for being too slow to respond. Meanwhile, a different kind of chaos was unfolding inside the SBA. A new computer system that was supposed to speed and simplify the loan process crashed time and again, resulting in massive delays. But that wasn’t the only problem. “There were lots of people sitting around not doing anything with thousands of applications pouring in everyday,” said Brad Durtschi, a former SBA loan officer who now works for FEMA. In the years leading up to the storms, the agency’s staff had been cut. When Katrina hit, followed by Rita about three weeks later, SBA had only 880 employees to process hundreds of thousands of loan applications, including 190 loan officers working at the Fort Worth center. SBA scrambled to hire several thousand additional staffers, many to work in Texas, where loan applications filed in dozens of makeshift disaster recovery centers along the Gulf Coast were sent for processing. The new loan officers – many from the private sector, with no loan processing experience – were rushed into service and expected to navigate a complex set of rules and regulations. It was bedlam, Durtschi said. The loan applications piled up, and the phones rang and rang. People wanted to know if their application had been approved, and when they would receive money to help reopen their business or rebuild their home. At one point, officers were told by supervisors not to answer phones because the questions were taking up too much time, former loan officers and supervisors told the AP. By December 2005, the system was gridlocked. Hundreds of thousands of applications were sitting in computer queues awaiting processing. And the phone calls turned from inquisitive to frustrated to angry. “People called in everyday crying and begging,” Martin said. “We were forced to do things that were wrong.” With congressional pressure mounting to turn loans around more quickly, the agency began using new methods to clear the backlog that had little to do with helping people get loans, former loan officers and supervisors said. Supervisors would reject applications if a single sheet of paper or signature was out of place. In the first four months following Katrina and Rita, the agency rejected more loans than it approved, according to an AP analysis. Loan officers were required to process up to twice as many applications per day. When one landed on their desk, a loan officer had to try three times within 24 hours to reach the potential borrower by telephone. If they didn’t, the loan was either declined or indefinitely shelved. If shelved, the loan application was effectively canceled and a letter was generated saying the applicant had 60 days to reapply. But many times, the loan officers, under pressure to reach quotas, would call only once or not at all, then withdraw or decline the application, the former loan workers said. They and their supervisors described computer queues clogged with tens of thousands of loan applications, and of overwhelmed employees being told to put efficiency above all else and callously dismiss the pleas of desperate people. “People were homeless, living in their cars,” said Young, now a bank loan officer. “People were running out of rental assistance. They didn’t have a place to go. They had worn out their favors with their families. And they needed to move on. And they would call and ask: ‘Could you please do anything you can to help us?’” “I couldn’t sleep,” he said. “I knew it wasn’t right.” Said Durtschi: “We had no compassion for these people. To our supervisors, it was all about production and we hurt a lot of people along the way.” A 2007 report from the SBA’s Office of the Inspector General, which performs independent reviews and audits of the agency, criticized SBA for canceling pending approved loans without warning. During one period in 2006, the report said, the agency’s Buffalo, N.Y., call center terminated 7,752 pending loans without notifying borrowers in advance. In many cases, the investigators found, no call had ever been made to the applicant to begin final processing. If a loan officer did manage to reach a borrower, the applicant was given 48 hours to fax documents to bring the loan to the closing phase. Often, the borrower didn’t have all the paperwork readily available. “Maybe you need a deed and it’s at the courthouse, but the courthouse is under water. The documentation is destroyed,” said Young, the former SBA loan officer. “Or maybe you need payroll stubs, and that information is gone. Now you’re told you have 48 hours to get it. That’s even if we reach you by phone. We have your old phone number. Sometimes we call, sometimes we don’t.” When borrowers requested additional time, the agency was unyielding, Young said. “We never budged,” he said. “It was a manufactured deadline that put undue stress on people.” “At the end of the 48 hours, you’re wiped out from our queue,” he said. “You didn’t exist.” ___ When a borrower did find the critical documents and fax them to Fort Worth, the paperwork would often get lost. The office had only a few fax machines to handle the crush. Receipt of the documentation was assured only if a loan officer waited by the machine to snag the papers. Bazile remembers faxing 50- to 70-page packets two or three times before someone at the processing center would acknowledge receipt. “How could something like that get lost?” she wondered. “It was a constant frustration.” Plus, the documents contained personal information, such as Social Security and bank account numbers. Martin recalled once arguing unsuccessfully with her supervisor in favor of approving a loan for a small business owner and being told: “Don’t think about it. Move on.” “They were ruthless, absolutely ruthless,” Martin said of her bosses. “We weren’t there to help the public.” Those same supervisors often conducted contests with cash prizes to reward loan officers who cleared the most applications, usually by rejecting as many as possible. One supervisor told the AP she won $100 for exceeding production quotas. “I would hear loan officers laughing about the loans they turned down,” Young said. “The same people kept winning.” In recent weeks, the AP found more than two dozen of the same supervisors still working in the Fort Worth office. But all of the current supervisors reached by the AP declined to comment, saying the agency prohibited them from talking. Others recall that productivity was the mantra at staff meetings. At one, a supervisor explained to loan officers how to get people off the phone. Use an egg timer, he said. When it goes off, hang up. “Your performance was measured on the number of files you closed,” said Bill Russell, a former loan officer and certified public accountant. “It wasn’t long until people discovered that to meet the quota, the easiest thing to do was just to deny the loan.” One supervisor who spoke to the AP on condition of anonymity out of fear she would lose her job said that on weekends fellow supervisors and other managers would order pizza and just empty the queue of applications. The extra sessions were called “Signoff Sunday,” she said. “It was all about getting these loans out of the system to make it appear like we were clearing up the backlog and helping people. But we weren’t helping people. What we were doing was saving our own jobs.” SBA’s Rivera questioned whether supervisors pushed loans through without review. “Obviously when you have 4,250 employees, you’re going to have some disgruntled employees,” he said. He said loan officers had to meet strict production quotas in line with the private sector. If they didn’t, they could be let go. But it was another campaign that created even more chaos in Fort Worth. By fall 2006, more than a year after Katrina, loans were still not moving quickly enough, former workers recalled. So SBA began “90-in-45,” a campaign to remove 90,000 loan applications from the queue in just 45 days. “There was no real incentive to approve a loan,” Young said. When borrowers found out their applications had been canceled, they would often call pleading for another chance, he said, adding that his supervisors wouldn’t let him help. “It was heart wrenching,” he said, fighting back tears. “There were some nights that my wife would ask, ‘What’s wrong with you?’ I’d sit there alone at the table, late at night, staring into space. Some nights I was up to 3 in the morning and I had to be up at 6.” ___ Over the past year, AP reporters visited dozens of Gulf Coast communities, even going door-to-door in two neighborhoods – in Waveland, Miss., and Chalmette, La. with high concentrations of SBA loans that were approved but never disbursed. Time and again, on streets where recovery has been hard to come by and where tall untended grass and cracked concrete foundations stand as reminders that many more people used to live and work here, the stories were remarkably consistent: A nightmare of lost paperwork; sudden and onerous deadlines; uncooperative, even combative loan officers at the other end of the phone line. People in these communities are fiercely independent and wary of asking the government for help. Many said they did so because Katrina was so thoroughly destructive that they had no choice. But many of those who recalled their battles with SBA said they dreaded the possibility of having to ask the agency for help ever again. Scott Peterson is still angry about the months he spent fighting with the SBA for a loan to reopen his flooded seafood restaurant in Waveland, a quiet beach town on the Mississippi coast that was nearly wiped off the map. He was rejected twice for a loan to repair the S&B Bar and Grill – even though he believed he qualified. He reopened in 2006, but not before maxing out his credit cards and borrowing money from his parents to rebuild. He says he did the best he could, but some of the windows on his restaurant are still boarded up and the roof leaks. Peterson is hurting again in a new way, this time because the oil spill has made it hard to find the seafood that draws his customers. Despite his resentment and lack of faith in the SBA, he’s contemplating making another request for help. “It’s going to be something to see when I apply again,” he said, shaking his head while stirring a pot of chicken gumbo on his kitchen stove. Bazile remembers how she became so upset dealing with the SBA process that she had to seek medical assistance. “I had no idea how overwhelming it was going to be,” said Bazile, 44, a former newspaper reporter who now works in the St. Bernard Parish president’s office. “My blood pressure shot up. My cardiologist asked me to stay home for a week or so, and so I did, but the problems didn’t go away.” Dealing with the agency became a full-time job for Bazile, who lives on a street in Chalmette that saw one of the highest concentrations of SBA activity along the coast. She took a seven-week leave from her job at The Times-Picayune to contend with the mounds of paperwork and battery of phone calls it took to secure the money to rebuild her home. More than once, a loan officer gave her a 48-hour deadline – out of the blue – to provide a required document or risk having her file closed. Phone messages went unreturned, and faxes to SBA mysteriously went missing. “It caused incredible emotional distress on me,” said a tearful Bazile. “Many, many times my husband said, ‘Just let it go. Let it go. We’ll be all right.’ And we could have walked away. But, in the end, that low interest rate was the very key to the way we’re living right now. They owed it to us, and I wasn’t going to let somebody bully me out of it.” ___ Many SBA applicants along the Gulf Coast had left their flooded homes and businesses and were living in tents, government-issued trailers, or with family and friends – sometimes far from home. In many cases, SBA officials had encouraged them to apply for loans. Few of the more than 200 interviewed said they had a smooth ride. Hassie Howell, who owned six rental properties on the same street in Chalmette, was approved for a $300,000 loan to fix up all six. He repeatedly called SBA to find out when he would receive the money. But each time he called, he said, he was transferred to another loan officer who wanted even more paperwork before the money could be released. When he sent in the documents, there were “more unexplained delays.” “More excuses,” he said. In the meantime, he was losing money. Unable to wait any longer, Howell sold two properties elsewhere in Chalmette and used the proceeds to begin rebuilding the rental units. When SBA called nearly a year later and told him it was ready to disburse the $300,000, Howell felt it was too little, too late. “I didn’t want anything to do with them,” he said. Today, the street is plagued by omnipresent concrete slabs and vacant decrepit homes. A neighboring street is a tangle of empty, garbage-strewn lots and shoulder-high weeds. Five of his homes have tenants. The community was stable before Katrina, Howell said. Now it is transient. “If I had gotten the money early, we would have been up and others would have returned,” said Howell, who now lives in Baton Rouge, La. “The whole experience was a nightmare.” ___ From the Fairhope Yacht Club’s wraparound porch, Schmitz watches boats bob before a brilliant orange-and-pink sunset and describes how the old clubhouse, a rambling, one-story structure, was destroyed by Katrina. That left members with a choice: Restore the facility to its former specs or build a new multistory clubhouse with amenities that could attract new members. They chose the latter. The new club’s $4 million price tag includes an SBA loan of about $1.5 million. The facility is double the size of the old building, with a new restaurant and bar and a swimming pool that alone cost nearly $300,000. The Fairhope Yacht Club reopened in 2008; these days there’s a waiting list to join. “For us, Katrina was an opportunity to build something bigger and better,” said Schmitz, a short, thin former teacher who looked ready for a regatta, with his khaki shorts, white sneakers and red pullover shirt emblazoned with the yacht club’s logo – a blue and white striped flag with the club’s initials. The yacht club had enough insurance to rebuild without SBA money. But without the federal help there would have been no upgrade. “I don’t see anything wrong with that,” Schmitz said. Yet SBA regulations state that loan recipients should rebuild properties only to pre-storm conditions. “Any improvements beyond pre-disaster condition is upgrading, and is not eligible,” according to SBA regulations. “Our program is set up to return you to your pre-disaster condition,” said Jay MacKenna, an SBA spokesman. “So if you had a 1,000-square-foot mobile home and that was totally destroyed, we could help you replace your 1,000-square-foot mobile home. We would not be providing you money to go out and buy a 2,000-square-foot mobile home.” There are certain exceptions, but they have to be authorized on a case-by-case basis. For example, the agency will allow an upgrade if an applicant uses their own money or borrows from a private lender to pay for the extra improvements. But agency officials have to check whether the borrower has the ability to repay the SBA loan and “any other debts.” Borrowers don’t always tell SBA about the extra expenditures, though, and the agency doesn’t always check. Schmitz said the club didn’t ask SBA if it could upgrade. But it was no secret; everyone in the community knew they were building a bigger yacht club. He said he never saw anyone from the SBA visit while the clubhouse was under construction. “We just told them we needed the money to rebuild. It was quick and fast and we didn’t have any problems,” he said. “It was a wonderful experience.” Before the money was disbursed, the agency verified Fairhope “had injected sufficient funds into the project” to meet the guidelines, said SBA spokeswoman Carol Chastang. “There was no indication anywhere in the file that the yacht club upgraded their facilities using SBA disaster loan proceeds,” she said in an e-mail. But she also said the yacht club had “completed much of the rebuilding with insurance and outside funding by the time it applied for the SBA disaster loan.” “What does that tell you about how the entire process worked? Did they really need the money? This violates the spirit of the rules,” said Gale Martin, one of the former SBA loan officers. For his part, Schmitz said the club’s members helped navigate the loan through the system. “You have to understand that we have people from all walks of life,” he said. “We have lawyers. We’ve got people who – loan officers, and all this – who all knew pretty much the inside track on all this stuff, and they took care of it for us.” ___ Associated Press writers Brian Skoloff, Becky Bohrer, Carrie Osgood, Peter Prengaman and the AP News Research Center contributed to this story. ___ The AP National Investigative Team can be reached at investigate (at) ap.org

Read the full article →

SBA’s Katrina Loans Criticized For Mismanagement, Bias, ‘No Compassion’

August 24, 2010

CHALMETTE, La. — Five years after Hurricane Katrina, Jay Young is still haunted by the desperate voices on the other end of the telephone crying and begging for help. As a loan officer for a federal agency that was supposed to help homeowners and businesses get back on their feet, he had high expectations he could make a difference. But he recalls how he was forced to turn away many qualified applicants because of what he says was pressure from his supervisors to close files quickly. Karen Bazile remembers having high hopes, too, when she applied for a loan from the same agency, the Small Business Administration, to rebuild her home in the New Orleans suburb of Chalmette. While she ultimately got the money, she quickly lost faith as she struggled with different loan officers who misplaced her paperwork and told her she had only 48 hours to find and fax critical documents or her application would be canceled. ___ EDITOR’S NOTE: This story was reported by Associated Press writers Mitch Weiss, Michael Kunzelman, Holbrook Mohr, Cain Burdeau, Troy Thibodeaux and Jason Bronis. It was written by Weiss. ___ Some 160 miles to the east, in Alabama, Erik Schmitz, former commodore of the Fairhope Yacht Club, takes in a breathtaking view of Mobile Bay from a posh new clubhouse rebuilt in part with a $1.5 million disaster loan, the maximum from the SBA. For Schmitz, the entire loan process was smooth sailing. While stories of the Federal Emergency Management Agency’s contaminated trailers and the Army Corps of Engineers’ inability to shore up the levees captured the headlines in the aftermath of the deadly storms of 2005, the bungling of the SBA, the lead federal agency helping people rebuild their homes and businesses, has largely been untold. The sagas of Schmitz, Bazile and the SBA’s Young, who worked out of the agency’s massive loan processing center in Fort Worth, Texas, collectively reveal how the SBA failed in so many ways, an ominous experience as the agency prepares to play a similar role in the aftermath of the massive BP PLC oil spill. These are stories of a mismanaged bureaucracy that still hurt half a decade later: tales of applications for low-interest disaster loans that should have been approved but were not, of applications deleted from the SBA computer system for no valid reason, of impossible-to-meet deadlines manufactured to clear backlogs, and of a process so chaotic and painful that thousands simply gave up. An Associated Press investigation based on more than 200 interviews, thousands of pages of public documents obtained under the federal Freedom of Information Act and a first-ever detailed computer analysis of SBA data from hurricanes Katrina and Rita found that: _ Despite the obvious need, 55 percent of homeowners and businesses that applied for help after the hurricanes were turned away. According to data provided by SBA, of 318,953 applications processed, 175,463 were rejected and 143,490 were approved. _ Only 60 percent of the loan money approved by SBA ultimately reached applicants. Over the years, SBA officials have told congressional committees that the agency had approved more than $10 billion in loans, touting it as an example of how SBA had helped those on the Gulf Coast. However, according to the data, only $6.1 billion of the approved loan money has been dispensed. SBA officials say many applicants never accepted the loans because they found other ways to rebuild, including using insurance money. But many former applicants said in interviews that they just walked away because the entire process took too long and was too complicated. _ Of the money SBA did distribute, $357 million – nearly 6 percent – has never been repaid. More than a dozen people whose loans were charged off told the AP that the agency hasn’t contacted them about repayment. _ Country clubs, yacht clubs, exclusive private schools and megachurches received millions in loans from the agency founded in 1953 with a mission to “aid, counsel, assist and protect the interests of small business concerns.” Some of the more substantial operations rebuilt bigger and better, often contradicting SBA rules that say damaged buildings should be repaired only to their original state. _ Homeowners and businesses in higher-income areas were more likely to get a loan than those in lower-income areas, according to AP’s analysis of SBA data by ZIP code. “The truth is that only the wealthy moved through the system easily,” said Gale Martin, another former SBA loan officer. “If you were of a certain income, we funded you first, which is not the way the system is supposed to work.” Martin contended that contrary to the SBA mission to especially help people who didn’t always have the means to rebuild, applicants with higher credit scores and bigger incomes were cherry-picked for processing first because those files could be closed quicker. _ A disparity also existed along racial lines. For example, the predominantly white, wealthier Lakeview section of New Orleans had the city’s highest ratio of approvals to rejections, while the lowest approval rates were in poorer, mostly black areas like the Lower 9th Ward. But a racial disparity was clear even among economically similar areas. SBA approved nearly 66 percent of loan applications in a predominantly white part of suburban St. Bernard Parish but approved only 42.1 percent in a predominantly black, adjacent section of eastern New Orleans with comparable median household income. SBA officials said they don’t collect information about race on loan applications, but try to reach out to applicants in poor neighborhoods. Civil rights leaders say the agency hasn’t done enough to help. SBA officials insist the agency today is better prepared to handle a major disaster. “We’re not proud of what happened during the 2005 Gulf Coast hurricanes,” said James Rivera, deputy associate administrator of SBA’s office of disaster assistance. “Our response was slow, but we’ve learned from our mistakes. We’ve had five years to reflect on this.” During that period, agency officials say, they have added staff, improved technology and simplified the loan process to push money out quickly to disaster victims. But recent reports by government watchdog groups and some critics have slammed SBA for being too slow to implement measures that could improve an agency with a troubled past. Congressional investigators and SBA whistleblowers question whether the agency is any better equipped for a major disaster today, as the region grapples with the oil-spill related assault on three pillars of its economy – seafood, tourism and offshore drilling. The SBA is once again setting up disaster recovery centers along the Gulf Coast, although the oil spill effort will likely be overshadowed by the hurricanes’ economic toll. While BP is responsible for the financial impact caused by the spill, the SBA is helping people while they wait for the corporate assistance. “This is going to happen again – tomorrow – if there’s another Katrina,” Martin said. “They didn’t fix enough for it not to happen.” ___ Images of New Orleanians trapped inside the Superdome without food and water, or desperately waiting on rooftops for help, haunted Americans in September 2005. Police officers walked off the job, looters ransacked downtown shops, and critics scolded the Bush administration for being too slow to respond. Meanwhile, a different kind of chaos was unfolding inside the SBA. A new computer system that was supposed to speed and simplify the loan process crashed time and again, resulting in massive delays. But that wasn’t the only problem. “There were lots of people sitting around not doing anything with thousands of applications pouring in everyday,” said Brad Durtschi, a former SBA loan officer who now works for FEMA. In the years leading up to the storms, the agency’s staff had been cut. When Katrina hit, followed by Rita about three weeks later, SBA had only 880 employees to process hundreds of thousands of loan applications, including 190 loan officers working at the Fort Worth center. SBA scrambled to hire several thousand additional staffers, many to work in Texas, where loan applications filed in dozens of makeshift disaster recovery centers along the Gulf Coast were sent for processing. The new loan officers – many from the private sector, with no loan processing experience – were rushed into service and expected to navigate a complex set of rules and regulations. It was bedlam, Durtschi said. The loan applications piled up, and the phones rang and rang. People wanted to know if their application had been approved, and when they would receive money to help reopen their business or rebuild their home. At one point, officers were told by supervisors not to answer phones because the questions were taking up too much time, former loan officers and supervisors told the AP. By December 2005, the system was gridlocked. Hundreds of thousands of applications were sitting in computer queues awaiting processing. And the phone calls turned from inquisitive to frustrated to angry. “People called in everyday crying and begging,” Martin said. “We were forced to do things that were wrong.” With congressional pressure mounting to turn loans around more quickly, the agency began using new methods to clear the backlog that had little to do with helping people get loans, former loan officers and supervisors said. Supervisors would reject applications if a single sheet of paper or signature was out of place. In the first four months following Katrina and Rita, the agency rejected more loans than it approved, according to an AP analysis. Loan officers were required to process up to twice as many applications per day. When one landed on their desk, a loan officer had to try three times within 24 hours to reach the potential borrower by telephone. If they didn’t, the loan was either declined or indefinitely shelved. If shelved, the loan application was effectively canceled and a letter was generated saying the applicant had 60 days to reapply. But many times, the loan officers, under pressure to reach quotas, would call only once or not at all, then withdraw or decline the application, the former loan workers said. They and their supervisors described computer queues clogged with tens of thousands of loan applications, and of overwhelmed employees being told to put efficiency above all else and callously dismiss the pleas of desperate people. “People were homeless, living in their cars,” said Young, now a bank loan officer. “People were running out of rental assistance. They didn’t have a place to go. They had worn out their favors with their families. And they needed to move on. And they would call and ask: ‘Could you please do anything you can to help us?’” “I couldn’t sleep,” he said. “I knew it wasn’t right.” Said Durtschi: “We had no compassion for these people. To our supervisors, it was all about production and we hurt a lot of people along the way.” A 2007 report from the SBA’s Office of the Inspector General, which performs independent reviews and audits of the agency, criticized SBA for canceling pending approved loans without warning. During one period in 2006, the report said, the agency’s Buffalo, N.Y., call center terminated 7,752 pending loans without notifying borrowers in advance. In many cases, the investigators found, no call had ever been made to the applicant to begin final processing. If a loan officer did manage to reach a borrower, the applicant was given 48 hours to fax documents to bring the loan to the closing phase. Often, the borrower didn’t have all the paperwork readily available. “Maybe you need a deed and it’s at the courthouse, but the courthouse is under water. The documentation is destroyed,” said Young, the former SBA loan officer. “Or maybe you need payroll stubs, and that information is gone. Now you’re told you have 48 hours to get it. That’s even if we reach you by phone. We have your old phone number. Sometimes we call, sometimes we don’t.” When borrowers requested additional time, the agency was unyielding, Young said. “We never budged,” he said. “It was a manufactured deadline that put undue stress on people.” “At the end of the 48 hours, you’re wiped out from our queue,” he said. “You didn’t exist.” ___ When a borrower did find the critical documents and fax them to Fort Worth, the paperwork would often get lost. The office had only a few fax machines to handle the crush. Receipt of the documentation was assured only if a loan officer waited by the machine to snag the papers. Bazile remembers faxing 50- to 70-page packets two or three times before someone at the processing center would acknowledge receipt. “How could something like that get lost?” she wondered. “It was a constant frustration.” Plus, the documents contained personal information, such as Social Security and bank account numbers. Martin recalled once arguing unsuccessfully with her supervisor in favor of approving a loan for a small business owner and being told: “Don’t think about it. Move on.” “They were ruthless, absolutely ruthless,” Martin said of her bosses. “We weren’t there to help the public.” Those same supervisors often conducted contests with cash prizes to reward loan officers who cleared the most applications, usually by rejecting as many as possible. One supervisor told the AP she won $100 for exceeding production quotas. “I would hear loan officers laughing about the loans they turned down,” Young said. “The same people kept winning.” In recent weeks, the AP found more than two dozen of the same supervisors still working in the Fort Worth office. But all of the current supervisors reached by the AP declined to comment, saying the agency prohibited them from talking. Others recall that productivity was the mantra at staff meetings. At one, a supervisor explained to loan officers how to get people off the phone. Use an egg timer, he said. When it goes off, hang up. “Your performance was measured on the number of files you closed,” said Bill Russell, a former loan officer and certified public accountant. “It wasn’t long until people discovered that to meet the quota, the easiest thing to do was just to deny the loan.” One supervisor who spoke to the AP on condition of anonymity out of fear she would lose her job said that on weekends fellow supervisors and other managers would order pizza and just empty the queue of applications. The extra sessions were called “Signoff Sunday,” she said. “It was all about getting these loans out of the system to make it appear like we were clearing up the backlog and helping people. But we weren’t helping people. What we were doing was saving our own jobs.” SBA’s Rivera questioned whether supervisors pushed loans through without review. “Obviously when you have 4,250 employees, you’re going to have some disgruntled employees,” he said. He said loan officers had to meet strict production quotas in line with the private sector. If they didn’t, they could be let go. But it was another campaign that created even more chaos in Fort Worth. By fall 2006, more than a year after Katrina, loans were still not moving quickly enough, former workers recalled. So SBA began “90-in-45,” a campaign to remove 90,000 loan applications from the queue in just 45 days. “There was no real incentive to approve a loan,” Young said. When borrowers found out their applications had been canceled, they would often call pleading for another chance, he said, adding that his supervisors wouldn’t let him help. “It was heart wrenching,” he said, fighting back tears. “There were some nights that my wife would ask, ‘What’s wrong with you?’ I’d sit there alone at the table, late at night, staring into space. Some nights I was up to 3 in the morning and I had to be up at 6.” ___ Over the past year, AP reporters visited dozens of Gulf Coast communities, even going door-to-door in two neighborhoods – in Waveland, Miss., and Chalmette, La. with high concentrations of SBA loans that were approved but never disbursed. Time and again, on streets where recovery has been hard to come by and where tall untended grass and cracked concrete foundations stand as reminders that many more people used to live and work here, the stories were remarkably consistent: A nightmare of lost paperwork; sudden and onerous deadlines; uncooperative, even combative loan officers at the other end of the phone line. People in these communities are fiercely independent and wary of asking the government for help. Many said they did so because Katrina was so thoroughly destructive that they had no choice. But many of those who recalled their battles with SBA said they dreaded the possibility of having to ask the agency for help ever again. Scott Peterson is still angry about the months he spent fighting with the SBA for a loan to reopen his flooded seafood restaurant in Waveland, a quiet beach town on the Mississippi coast that was nearly wiped off the map. He was rejected twice for a loan to repair the S&B Bar and Grill – even though he believed he qualified. He reopened in 2006, but not before maxing out his credit cards and borrowing money from his parents to rebuild. He says he did the best he could, but some of the windows on his restaurant are still boarded up and the roof leaks. Peterson is hurting again in a new way, this time because the oil spill has made it hard to find the seafood that draws his customers. Despite his resentment and lack of faith in the SBA, he’s contemplating making another request for help. “It’s going to be something to see when I apply again,” he said, shaking his head while stirring a pot of chicken gumbo on his kitchen stove. Bazile remembers how she became so upset dealing with the SBA process that she had to seek medical assistance. “I had no idea how overwhelming it was going to be,” said Bazile, 44, a former newspaper reporter who now works in the St. Bernard Parish president’s office. “My blood pressure shot up. My cardiologist asked me to stay home for a week or so, and so I did, but the problems didn’t go away.” Dealing with the agency became a full-time job for Bazile, who lives on a street in Chalmette that saw one of the highest concentrations of SBA activity along the coast. She took a seven-week leave from her job at The Times-Picayune to contend with the mounds of paperwork and battery of phone calls it took to secure the money to rebuild her home. More than once, a loan officer gave her a 48-hour deadline – out of the blue – to provide a required document or risk having her file closed. Phone messages went unreturned, and faxes to SBA mysteriously went missing. “It caused incredible emotional distress on me,” said a tearful Bazile. “Many, many times my husband said, ‘Just let it go. Let it go. We’ll be all right.’ And we could have walked away. But, in the end, that low interest rate was the very key to the way we’re living right now. They owed it to us, and I wasn’t going to let somebody bully me out of it.” ___ Many SBA applicants along the Gulf Coast had left their flooded homes and businesses and were living in tents, government-issued trailers, or with family and friends – sometimes far from home. In many cases, SBA officials had encouraged them to apply for loans. Few of the more than 200 interviewed said they had a smooth ride. Hassie Howell, who owned six rental properties on the same street in Chalmette, was approved for a $300,000 loan to fix up all six. He repeatedly called SBA to find out when he would receive the money. But each time he called, he said, he was transferred to another loan officer who wanted even more paperwork before the money could be released. When he sent in the documents, there were “more unexplained delays.” “More excuses,” he said. In the meantime, he was losing money. Unable to wait any longer, Howell sold two properties elsewhere in Chalmette and used the proceeds to begin rebuilding the rental units. When SBA called nearly a year later and told him it was ready to disburse the $300,000, Howell felt it was too little, too late. “I didn’t want anything to do with them,” he said. Today, the street is plagued by omnipresent concrete slabs and vacant decrepit homes. A neighboring street is a tangle of empty, garbage-strewn lots and shoulder-high weeds. Five of his homes have tenants. The community was stable before Katrina, Howell said. Now it is transient. “If I had gotten the money early, we would have been up and others would have returned,” said Howell, who now lives in Baton Rouge, La. “The whole experience was a nightmare.” ___ From the Fairhope Yacht Club’s wraparound porch, Schmitz watches boats bob before a brilliant orange-and-pink sunset and describes how the old clubhouse, a rambling, one-story structure, was destroyed by Katrina. That left members with a choice: Restore the facility to its former specs or build a new multistory clubhouse with amenities that could attract new members. They chose the latter. The new club’s $4 million price tag includes an SBA loan of about $1.5 million. The facility is double the size of the old building, with a new restaurant and bar and a swimming pool that alone cost nearly $300,000. The Fairhope Yacht Club reopened in 2008; these days there’s a waiting list to join. “For us, Katrina was an opportunity to build something bigger and better,” said Schmitz, a short, thin former teacher who looked ready for a regatta, with his khaki shorts, white sneakers and red pullover shirt emblazoned with the yacht club’s logo – a blue and white striped flag with the club’s initials. The yacht club had enough insurance to rebuild without SBA money. But without the federal help there would have been no upgrade. “I don’t see anything wrong with that,” Schmitz said. Yet SBA regulations state that loan recipients should rebuild properties only to pre-storm conditions. “Any improvements beyond pre-disaster condition is upgrading, and is not eligible,” according to SBA regulations. “Our program is set up to return you to your pre-disaster condition,” said Jay MacKenna, an SBA spokesman. “So if you had a 1,000-square-foot mobile home and that was totally destroyed, we could help you replace your 1,000-square-foot mobile home. We would not be providing you money to go out and buy a 2,000-square-foot mobile home.” There are certain exceptions, but they have to be authorized on a case-by-case basis. For example, the agency will allow an upgrade if an applicant uses their own money or borrows from a private lender to pay for the extra improvements. But agency officials have to check whether the borrower has the ability to repay the SBA loan and “any other debts.” Borrowers don’t always tell SBA about the extra expenditures, though, and the agency doesn’t always check. Schmitz said the club didn’t ask SBA if it could upgrade. But it was no secret; everyone in the community knew they were building a bigger yacht club. He said he never saw anyone from the SBA visit while the clubhouse was under construction. “We just told them we needed the money to rebuild. It was quick and fast and we didn’t have any problems,” he said. “It was a wonderful experience.” Before the money was disbursed, the agency verified Fairhope “had injected sufficient funds into the project” to meet the guidelines, said SBA spokeswoman Carol Chastang. “There was no indication anywhere in the file that the yacht club upgraded their facilities using SBA disaster loan proceeds,” she said in an e-mail. But she also said the yacht club had “completed much of the rebuilding with insurance and outside funding by the time it applied for the SBA disaster loan.” “What does that tell you about how the entire process worked? Did they really need the money? This violates the spirit of the rules,” said Gale Martin, one of the former SBA loan officers. For his part, Schmitz said the club’s members helped navigate the loan through the system. “You have to understand that we have people from all walks of life,” he said. “We have lawyers. We’ve got people who – loan officers, and all this – who all knew pretty much the inside track on all this stuff, and they took care of it for us.” ___ Associated Press writers Brian Skoloff, Becky Bohrer, Carrie Osgood, Peter Prengaman and the AP News Research Center contributed to this story. ___ The AP National Investigative Team can be reached at investigate (at) ap.org

Read the full article →

SBA’s Katrina Loans Criticized For Mismanagement, Bias, ‘No Compassion’

August 24, 2010

CHALMETTE, La. — Five years after Hurricane Katrina, Jay Young is still haunted by the desperate voices on the other end of the telephone crying and begging for help. As a loan officer for a federal agency that was supposed to help homeowners and businesses get back on their feet, he had high expectations he could make a difference. But he recalls how he was forced to turn away many qualified applicants because of what he says was pressure from his supervisors to close files quickly. Karen Bazile remembers having high hopes, too, when she applied for a loan from the same agency, the Small Business Administration, to rebuild her home in the New Orleans suburb of Chalmette. While she ultimately got the money, she quickly lost faith as she struggled with different loan officers who misplaced her paperwork and told her she had only 48 hours to find and fax critical documents or her application would be canceled. ___ EDITOR’S NOTE: This story was reported by Associated Press writers Mitch Weiss, Michael Kunzelman, Holbrook Mohr, Cain Burdeau, Troy Thibodeaux and Jason Bronis. It was written by Weiss. ___ Some 160 miles to the east, in Alabama, Erik Schmitz, former commodore of the Fairhope Yacht Club, takes in a breathtaking view of Mobile Bay from a posh new clubhouse rebuilt in part with a $1.5 million disaster loan, the maximum from the SBA. For Schmitz, the entire loan process was smooth sailing. While stories of the Federal Emergency Management Agency’s contaminated trailers and the Army Corps of Engineers’ inability to shore up the levees captured the headlines in the aftermath of the deadly storms of 2005, the bungling of the SBA, the lead federal agency helping people rebuild their homes and businesses, has largely been untold. The sagas of Schmitz, Bazile and the SBA’s Young, who worked out of the agency’s massive loan processing center in Fort Worth, Texas, collectively reveal how the SBA failed in so many ways, an ominous experience as the agency prepares to play a similar role in the aftermath of the massive BP PLC oil spill. These are stories of a mismanaged bureaucracy that still hurt half a decade later: tales of applications for low-interest disaster loans that should have been approved but were not, of applications deleted from the SBA computer system for no valid reason, of impossible-to-meet deadlines manufactured to clear backlogs, and of a process so chaotic and painful that thousands simply gave up. An Associated Press investigation based on more than 200 interviews, thousands of pages of public documents obtained under the federal Freedom of Information Act and a first-ever detailed computer analysis of SBA data from hurricanes Katrina and Rita found that: _ Despite the obvious need, 55 percent of homeowners and businesses that applied for help after the hurricanes were turned away. According to data provided by SBA, of 318,953 applications processed, 175,463 were rejected and 143,490 were approved. _ Only 60 percent of the loan money approved by SBA ultimately reached applicants. Over the years, SBA officials have told congressional committees that the agency had approved more than $10 billion in loans, touting it as an example of how SBA had helped those on the Gulf Coast. However, according to the data, only $6.1 billion of the approved loan money has been dispensed. SBA officials say many applicants never accepted the loans because they found other ways to rebuild, including using insurance money. But many former applicants said in interviews that they just walked away because the entire process took too long and was too complicated. _ Of the money SBA did distribute, $357 million – nearly 6 percent – has never been repaid. More than a dozen people whose loans were charged off told the AP that the agency hasn’t contacted them about repayment. _ Country clubs, yacht clubs, exclusive private schools and megachurches received millions in loans from the agency founded in 1953 with a mission to “aid, counsel, assist and protect the interests of small business concerns.” Some of the more substantial operations rebuilt bigger and better, often contradicting SBA rules that say damaged buildings should be repaired only to their original state. _ Homeowners and businesses in higher-income areas were more likely to get a loan than those in lower-income areas, according to AP’s analysis of SBA data by ZIP code. “The truth is that only the wealthy moved through the system easily,” said Gale Martin, another former SBA loan officer. “If you were of a certain income, we funded you first, which is not the way the system is supposed to work.” Martin contended that contrary to the SBA mission to especially help people who didn’t always have the means to rebuild, applicants with higher credit scores and bigger incomes were cherry-picked for processing first because those files could be closed quicker. _ A disparity also existed along racial lines. For example, the predominantly white, wealthier Lakeview section of New Orleans had the city’s highest ratio of approvals to rejections, while the lowest approval rates were in poorer, mostly black areas like the Lower 9th Ward. But a racial disparity was clear even among economically similar areas. SBA approved nearly 66 percent of loan applications in a predominantly white part of suburban St. Bernard Parish but approved only 42.1 percent in a predominantly black, adjacent section of eastern New Orleans with comparable median household income. SBA officials said they don’t collect information about race on loan applications, but try to reach out to applicants in poor neighborhoods. Civil rights leaders say the agency hasn’t done enough to help. SBA officials insist the agency today is better prepared to handle a major disaster. “We’re not proud of what happened during the 2005 Gulf Coast hurricanes,” said James Rivera, deputy associate administrator of SBA’s office of disaster assistance. “Our response was slow, but we’ve learned from our mistakes. We’ve had five years to reflect on this.” During that period, agency officials say, they have added staff, improved technology and simplified the loan process to push money out quickly to disaster victims. But recent reports by government watchdog groups and some critics have slammed SBA for being too slow to implement measures that could improve an agency with a troubled past. Congressional investigators and SBA whistleblowers question whether the agency is any better equipped for a major disaster today, as the region grapples with the oil-spill related assault on three pillars of its economy – seafood, tourism and offshore drilling. The SBA is once again setting up disaster recovery centers along the Gulf Coast, although the oil spill effort will likely be overshadowed by the hurricanes’ economic toll. While BP is responsible for the financial impact caused by the spill, the SBA is helping people while they wait for the corporate assistance. “This is going to happen again – tomorrow – if there’s another Katrina,” Martin said. “They didn’t fix enough for it not to happen.” ___ Images of New Orleanians trapped inside the Superdome without food and water, or desperately waiting on rooftops for help, haunted Americans in September 2005. Police officers walked off the job, looters ransacked downtown shops, and critics scolded the Bush administration for being too slow to respond. Meanwhile, a different kind of chaos was unfolding inside the SBA. A new computer system that was supposed to speed and simplify the loan process crashed time and again, resulting in massive delays. But that wasn’t the only problem. “There were lots of people sitting around not doing anything with thousands of applications pouring in everyday,” said Brad Durtschi, a former SBA loan officer who now works for FEMA. In the years leading up to the storms, the agency’s staff had been cut. When Katrina hit, followed by Rita about three weeks later, SBA had only 880 employees to process hundreds of thousands of loan applications, including 190 loan officers working at the Fort Worth center. SBA scrambled to hire several thousand additional staffers, many to work in Texas, where loan applications filed in dozens of makeshift disaster recovery centers along the Gulf Coast were sent for processing. The new loan officers – many from the private sector, with no loan processing experience – were rushed into service and expected to navigate a complex set of rules and regulations. It was bedlam, Durtschi said. The loan applications piled up, and the phones rang and rang. People wanted to know if their application had been approved, and when they would receive money to help reopen their business or rebuild their home. At one point, officers were told by supervisors not to answer phones because the questions were taking up too much time, former loan officers and supervisors told the AP. By December 2005, the system was gridlocked. Hundreds of thousands of applications were sitting in computer queues awaiting processing. And the phone calls turned from inquisitive to frustrated to angry. “People called in everyday crying and begging,” Martin said. “We were forced to do things that were wrong.” With congressional pressure mounting to turn loans around more quickly, the agency began using new methods to clear the backlog that had little to do with helping people get loans, former loan officers and supervisors said. Supervisors would reject applications if a single sheet of paper or signature was out of place. In the first four months following Katrina and Rita, the agency rejected more loans than it approved, according to an AP analysis. Loan officers were required to process up to twice as many applications per day. When one landed on their desk, a loan officer had to try three times within 24 hours to reach the potential borrower by telephone. If they didn’t, the loan was either declined or indefinitely shelved. If shelved, the loan application was effectively canceled and a letter was generated saying the applicant had 60 days to reapply. But many times, the loan officers, under pressure to reach quotas, would call only once or not at all, then withdraw or decline the application, the former loan workers said. They and their supervisors described computer queues clogged with tens of thousands of loan applications, and of overwhelmed employees being told to put efficiency above all else and callously dismiss the pleas of desperate people. “People were homeless, living in their cars,” said Young, now a bank loan officer. “People were running out of rental assistance. They didn’t have a place to go. They had worn out their favors with their families. And they needed to move on. And they would call and ask: ‘Could you please do anything you can to help us?’” “I couldn’t sleep,” he said. “I knew it wasn’t right.” Said Durtschi: “We had no compassion for these people. To our supervisors, it was all about production and we hurt a lot of people along the way.” A 2007 report from the SBA’s Office of the Inspector General, which performs independent reviews and audits of the agency, criticized SBA for canceling pending approved loans without warning. During one period in 2006, the report said, the agency’s Buffalo, N.Y., call center terminated 7,752 pending loans without notifying borrowers in advance. In many cases, the investigators found, no call had ever been made to the applicant to begin final processing. If a loan officer did manage to reach a borrower, the applicant was given 48 hours to fax documents to bring the loan to the closing phase. Often, the borrower didn’t have all the paperwork readily available. “Maybe you need a deed and it’s at the courthouse, but the courthouse is under water. The documentation is destroyed,” said Young, the former SBA loan officer. “Or maybe you need payroll stubs, and that information is gone. Now you’re told you have 48 hours to get it. That’s even if we reach you by phone. We have your old phone number. Sometimes we call, sometimes we don’t.” When borrowers requested additional time, the agency was unyielding, Young said. “We never budged,” he said. “It was a manufactured deadline that put undue stress on people.” “At the end of the 48 hours, you’re wiped out from our queue,” he said. “You didn’t exist.” ___ When a borrower did find the critical documents and fax them to Fort Worth, the paperwork would often get lost. The office had only a few fax machines to handle the crush. Receipt of the documentation was assured only if a loan officer waited by the machine to snag the papers. Bazile remembers faxing 50- to 70-page packets two or three times before someone at the processing center would acknowledge receipt. “How could something like that get lost?” she wondered. “It was a constant frustration.” Plus, the documents contained personal information, such as Social Security and bank account numbers. Martin recalled once arguing unsuccessfully with her supervisor in favor of approving a loan for a small business owner and being told: “Don’t think about it. Move on.” “They were ruthless, absolutely ruthless,” Martin said of her bosses. “We weren’t there to help the public.” Those same supervisors often conducted contests with cash prizes to reward loan officers who cleared the most applications, usually by rejecting as many as possible. One supervisor told the AP she won $100 for exceeding production quotas. “I would hear loan officers laughing about the loans they turned down,” Young said. “The same people kept winning.” In recent weeks, the AP found more than two dozen of the same supervisors still working in the Fort Worth office. But all of the current supervisors reached by the AP declined to comment, saying the agency prohibited them from talking. Others recall that productivity was the mantra at staff meetings. At one, a supervisor explained to loan officers how to get people off the phone. Use an egg timer, he said. When it goes off, hang up. “Your performance was measured on the number of files you closed,” said Bill Russell, a former loan officer and certified public accountant. “It wasn’t long until people discovered that to meet the quota, the easiest thing to do was just to deny the loan.” One supervisor who spoke to the AP on condition of anonymity out of fear she would lose her job said that on weekends fellow supervisors and other managers would order pizza and just empty the queue of applications. The extra sessions were called “Signoff Sunday,” she said. “It was all about getting these loans out of the system to make it appear like we were clearing up the backlog and helping people. But we weren’t helping people. What we were doing was saving our own jobs.” SBA’s Rivera questioned whether supervisors pushed loans through without review. “Obviously when you have 4,250 employees, you’re going to have some disgruntled employees,” he said. He said loan officers had to meet strict production quotas in line with the private sector. If they didn’t, they could be let go. But it was another campaign that created even more chaos in Fort Worth. By fall 2006, more than a year after Katrina, loans were still not moving quickly enough, former workers recalled. So SBA began “90-in-45,” a campaign to remove 90,000 loan applications from the queue in just 45 days. “There was no real incentive to approve a loan,” Young said. When borrowers found out their applications had been canceled, they would often call pleading for another chance, he said, adding that his supervisors wouldn’t let him help. “It was heart wrenching,” he said, fighting back tears. “There were some nights that my wife would ask, ‘What’s wrong with you?’ I’d sit there alone at the table, late at night, staring into space. Some nights I was up to 3 in the morning and I had to be up at 6.” ___ Over the past year, AP reporters visited dozens of Gulf Coast communities, even going door-to-door in two neighborhoods – in Waveland, Miss., and Chalmette, La. with high concentrations of SBA loans that were approved but never disbursed. Time and again, on streets where recovery has been hard to come by and where tall untended grass and cracked concrete foundations stand as reminders that many more people used to live and work here, the stories were remarkably consistent: A nightmare of lost paperwork; sudden and onerous deadlines; uncooperative, even combative loan officers at the other end of the phone line. People in these communities are fiercely independent and wary of asking the government for help. Many said they did so because Katrina was so thoroughly destructive that they had no choice. But many of those who recalled their battles with SBA said they dreaded the possibility of having to ask the agency for help ever again. Scott Peterson is still angry about the months he spent fighting with the SBA for a loan to reopen his flooded seafood restaurant in Waveland, a quiet beach town on the Mississippi coast that was nearly wiped off the map. He was rejected twice for a loan to repair the S&B Bar and Grill – even though he believed he qualified. He reopened in 2006, but not before maxing out his credit cards and borrowing money from his parents to rebuild. He says he did the best he could, but some of the windows on his restaurant are still boarded up and the roof leaks. Peterson is hurting again in a new way, this time because the oil spill has made it hard to find the seafood that draws his customers. Despite his resentment and lack of faith in the SBA, he’s contemplating making another request for help. “It’s going to be something to see when I apply again,” he said, shaking his head while stirring a pot of chicken gumbo on his kitchen stove. Bazile remembers how she became so upset dealing with the SBA process that she had to seek medical assistance. “I had no idea how overwhelming it was going to be,” said Bazile, 44, a former newspaper reporter who now works in the St. Bernard Parish president’s office. “My blood pressure shot up. My cardiologist asked me to stay home for a week or so, and so I did, but the problems didn’t go away.” Dealing with the agency became a full-time job for Bazile, who lives on a street in Chalmette that saw one of the highest concentrations of SBA activity along the coast. She took a seven-week leave from her job at The Times-Picayune to contend with the mounds of paperwork and battery of phone calls it took to secure the money to rebuild her home. More than once, a loan officer gave her a 48-hour deadline – out of the blue – to provide a required document or risk having her file closed. Phone messages went unreturned, and faxes to SBA mysteriously went missing. “It caused incredible emotional distress on me,” said a tearful Bazile. “Many, many times my husband said, ‘Just let it go. Let it go. We’ll be all right.’ And we could have walked away. But, in the end, that low interest rate was the very key to the way we’re living right now. They owed it to us, and I wasn’t going to let somebody bully me out of it.” ___ Many SBA applicants along the Gulf Coast had left their flooded homes and businesses and were living in tents, government-issued trailers, or with family and friends – sometimes far from home. In many cases, SBA officials had encouraged them to apply for loans. Few of the more than 200 interviewed said they had a smooth ride. Hassie Howell, who owned six rental properties on the same street in Chalmette, was approved for a $300,000 loan to fix up all six. He repeatedly called SBA to find out when he would receive the money. But each time he called, he said, he was transferred to another loan officer who wanted even more paperwork before the money could be released. When he sent in the documents, there were “more unexplained delays.” “More excuses,” he said. In the meantime, he was losing money. Unable to wait any longer, Howell sold two properties elsewhere in Chalmette and used the proceeds to begin rebuilding the rental units. When SBA called nearly a year later and told him it was ready to disburse the $300,000, Howell felt it was too little, too late. “I didn’t want anything to do with them,” he said. Today, the street is plagued by omnipresent concrete slabs and vacant decrepit homes. A neighboring street is a tangle of empty, garbage-strewn lots and shoulder-high weeds. Five of his homes have tenants. The community was stable before Katrina, Howell said. Now it is transient. “If I had gotten the money early, we would have been up and others would have returned,” said Howell, who now lives in Baton Rouge, La. “The whole experience was a nightmare.” ___ From the Fairhope Yacht Club’s wraparound porch, Schmitz watches boats bob before a brilliant orange-and-pink sunset and describes how the old clubhouse, a rambling, one-story structure, was destroyed by Katrina. That left members with a choice: Restore the facility to its former specs or build a new multistory clubhouse with amenities that could attract new members. They chose the latter. The new club’s $4 million price tag includes an SBA loan of about $1.5 million. The facility is double the size of the old building, with a new restaurant and bar and a swimming pool that alone cost nearly $300,000. The Fairhope Yacht Club reopened in 2008; these days there’s a waiting list to join. “For us, Katrina was an opportunity to build something bigger and better,” said Schmitz, a short, thin former teacher who looked ready for a regatta, with his khaki shorts, white sneakers and red pullover shirt emblazoned with the yacht club’s logo – a blue and white striped flag with the club’s initials. The yacht club had enough insurance to rebuild without SBA money. But without the federal help there would have been no upgrade. “I don’t see anything wrong with that,” Schmitz said. Yet SBA regulations state that loan recipients should rebuild properties only to pre-storm conditions. “Any improvements beyond pre-disaster condition is upgrading, and is not eligible,” according to SBA regulations. “Our program is set up to return you to your pre-disaster condition,” said Jay MacKenna, an SBA spokesman. “So if you had a 1,000-square-foot mobile home and that was totally destroyed, we could help you replace your 1,000-square-foot mobile home. We would not be providing you money to go out and buy a 2,000-square-foot mobile home.” There are certain exceptions, but they have to be authorized on a case-by-case basis. For example, the agency will allow an upgrade if an applicant uses their own money or borrows from a private lender to pay for the extra improvements. But agency officials have to check whether the borrower has the ability to repay the SBA loan and “any other debts.” Borrowers don’t always tell SBA about the extra expenditures, though, and the agency doesn’t always check. Schmitz said the club didn’t ask SBA if it could upgrade. But it was no secret; everyone in the community knew they were building a bigger yacht club. He said he never saw anyone from the SBA visit while the clubhouse was under construction. “We just told them we needed the money to rebuild. It was quick and fast and we didn’t have any problems,” he said. “It was a wonderful experience.” Before the money was disbursed, the agency verified Fairhope “had injected sufficient funds into the project” to meet the guidelines, said SBA spokeswoman Carol Chastang. “There was no indication anywhere in the file that the yacht club upgraded their facilities using SBA disaster loan proceeds,” she said in an e-mail. But she also said the yacht club had “completed much of the rebuilding with insurance and outside funding by the time it applied for the SBA disaster loan.” “What does that tell you about how the entire process worked? Did they really need the money? This violates the spirit of the rules,” said Gale Martin, one of the former SBA loan officers. For his part, Schmitz said the club’s members helped navigate the loan through the system. “You have to understand that we have people from all walks of life,” he said. “We have lawyers. We’ve got people who – loan officers, and all this – who all knew pretty much the inside track on all this stuff, and they took care of it for us.” ___ Associated Press writers Brian Skoloff, Becky Bohrer, Carrie Osgood, Peter Prengaman and the AP News Research Center contributed to this story. ___ The AP National Investigative Team can be reached at investigate (at) ap.org

Read the full article →

SBA’s Katrina Loans Criticized For Mismanagement, Bias, ‘No Compassion’

August 24, 2010

CHALMETTE, La. — Five years after Hurricane Katrina, Jay Young is still haunted by the desperate voices on the other end of the telephone crying and begging for help. As a loan officer for a federal agency that was supposed to help homeowners and businesses get back on their feet, he had high expectations he could make a difference. But he recalls how he was forced to turn away many qualified applicants because of what he says was pressure from his supervisors to close files quickly. Karen Bazile remembers having high hopes, too, when she applied for a loan from the same agency, the Small Business Administration, to rebuild her home in the New Orleans suburb of Chalmette. While she ultimately got the money, she quickly lost faith as she struggled with different loan officers who misplaced her paperwork and told her she had only 48 hours to find and fax critical documents or her application would be canceled. ___ EDITOR’S NOTE: This story was reported by Associated Press writers Mitch Weiss, Michael Kunzelman, Holbrook Mohr, Cain Burdeau, Troy Thibodeaux and Jason Bronis. It was written by Weiss. ___ Some 160 miles to the east, in Alabama, Erik Schmitz, former commodore of the Fairhope Yacht Club, takes in a breathtaking view of Mobile Bay from a posh new clubhouse rebuilt in part with a $1.5 million disaster loan, the maximum from the SBA. For Schmitz, the entire loan process was smooth sailing. While stories of the Federal Emergency Management Agency’s contaminated trailers and the Army Corps of Engineers’ inability to shore up the levees captured the headlines in the aftermath of the deadly storms of 2005, the bungling of the SBA, the lead federal agency helping people rebuild their homes and businesses, has largely been untold. The sagas of Schmitz, Bazile and the SBA’s Young, who worked out of the agency’s massive loan processing center in Fort Worth, Texas, collectively reveal how the SBA failed in so many ways, an ominous experience as the agency prepares to play a similar role in the aftermath of the massive BP PLC oil spill. These are stories of a mismanaged bureaucracy that still hurt half a decade later: tales of applications for low-interest disaster loans that should have been approved but were not, of applications deleted from the SBA computer system for no valid reason, of impossible-to-meet deadlines manufactured to clear backlogs, and of a process so chaotic and painful that thousands simply gave up. An Associated Press investigation based on more than 200 interviews, thousands of pages of public documents obtained under the federal Freedom of Information Act and a first-ever detailed computer analysis of SBA data from hurricanes Katrina and Rita found that: _ Despite the obvious need, 55 percent of homeowners and businesses that applied for help after the hurricanes were turned away. According to data provided by SBA, of 318,953 applications processed, 175,463 were rejected and 143,490 were approved. _ Only 60 percent of the loan money approved by SBA ultimately reached applicants. Over the years, SBA officials have told congressional committees that the agency had approved more than $10 billion in loans, touting it as an example of how SBA had helped those on the Gulf Coast. However, according to the data, only $6.1 billion of the approved loan money has been dispensed. SBA officials say many applicants never accepted the loans because they found other ways to rebuild, including using insurance money. But many former applicants said in interviews that they just walked away because the entire process took too long and was too complicated. _ Of the money SBA did distribute, $357 million – nearly 6 percent – has never been repaid. More than a dozen people whose loans were charged off told the AP that the agency hasn’t contacted them about repayment. _ Country clubs, yacht clubs, exclusive private schools and megachurches received millions in loans from the agency founded in 1953 with a mission to “aid, counsel, assist and protect the interests of small business concerns.” Some of the more substantial operations rebuilt bigger and better, often contradicting SBA rules that say damaged buildings should be repaired only to their original state. _ Homeowners and businesses in higher-income areas were more likely to get a loan than those in lower-income areas, according to AP’s analysis of SBA data by ZIP code. “The truth is that only the wealthy moved through the system easily,” said Gale Martin, another former SBA loan officer. “If you were of a certain income, we funded you first, which is not the way the system is supposed to work.” Martin contended that contrary to the SBA mission to especially help people who didn’t always have the means to rebuild, applicants with higher credit scores and bigger incomes were cherry-picked for processing first because those files could be closed quicker. _ A disparity also existed along racial lines. For example, the predominantly white, wealthier Lakeview section of New Orleans had the city’s highest ratio of approvals to rejections, while the lowest approval rates were in poorer, mostly black areas like the Lower 9th Ward. But a racial disparity was clear even among economically similar areas. SBA approved nearly 66 percent of loan applications in a predominantly white part of suburban St. Bernard Parish but approved only 42.1 percent in a predominantly black, adjacent section of eastern New Orleans with comparable median household income. SBA officials said they don’t collect information about race on loan applications, but try to reach out to applicants in poor neighborhoods. Civil rights leaders say the agency hasn’t done enough to help. SBA officials insist the agency today is better prepared to handle a major disaster. “We’re not proud of what happened during the 2005 Gulf Coast hurricanes,” said James Rivera, deputy associate administrator of SBA’s office of disaster assistance. “Our response was slow, but we’ve learned from our mistakes. We’ve had five years to reflect on this.” During that period, agency officials say, they have added staff, improved technology and simplified the loan process to push money out quickly to disaster victims. But recent reports by government watchdog groups and some critics have slammed SBA for being too slow to implement measures that could improve an agency with a troubled past. Congressional investigators and SBA whistleblowers question whether the agency is any better equipped for a major disaster today, as the region grapples with the oil-spill related assault on three pillars of its economy – seafood, tourism and offshore drilling. The SBA is once again setting up disaster recovery centers along the Gulf Coast, although the oil spill effort will likely be overshadowed by the hurricanes’ economic toll. While BP is responsible for the financial impact caused by the spill, the SBA is helping people while they wait for the corporate assistance. “This is going to happen again – tomorrow – if there’s another Katrina,” Martin said. “They didn’t fix enough for it not to happen.” ___ Images of New Orleanians trapped inside the Superdome without food and water, or desperately waiting on rooftops for help, haunted Americans in September 2005. Police officers walked off the job, looters ransacked downtown shops, and critics scolded the Bush administration for being too slow to respond. Meanwhile, a different kind of chaos was unfolding inside the SBA. A new computer system that was supposed to speed and simplify the loan process crashed time and again, resulting in massive delays. But that wasn’t the only problem. “There were lots of people sitting around not doing anything with thousands of applications pouring in everyday,” said Brad Durtschi, a former SBA loan officer who now works for FEMA. In the years leading up to the storms, the agency’s staff had been cut. When Katrina hit, followed by Rita about three weeks later, SBA had only 880 employees to process hundreds of thousands of loan applications, including 190 loan officers working at the Fort Worth center. SBA scrambled to hire several thousand additional staffers, many to work in Texas, where loan applications filed in dozens of makeshift disaster recovery centers along the Gulf Coast were sent for processing. The new loan officers – many from the private sector, with no loan processing experience – were rushed into service and expected to navigate a complex set of rules and regulations. It was bedlam, Durtschi said. The loan applications piled up, and the phones rang and rang. People wanted to know if their application had been approved, and when they would receive money to help reopen their business or rebuild their home. At one point, officers were told by supervisors not to answer phones because the questions were taking up too much time, former loan officers and supervisors told the AP. By December 2005, the system was gridlocked. Hundreds of thousands of applications were sitting in computer queues awaiting processing. And the phone calls turned from inquisitive to frustrated to angry. “People called in everyday crying and begging,” Martin said. “We were forced to do things that were wrong.” With congressional pressure mounting to turn loans around more quickly, the agency began using new methods to clear the backlog that had little to do with helping people get loans, former loan officers and supervisors said. Supervisors would reject applications if a single sheet of paper or signature was out of place. In the first four months following Katrina and Rita, the agency rejected more loans than it approved, according to an AP analysis. Loan officers were required to process up to twice as many applications per day. When one landed on their desk, a loan officer had to try three times within 24 hours to reach the potential borrower by telephone. If they didn’t, the loan was either declined or indefinitely shelved. If shelved, the loan application was effectively canceled and a letter was generated saying the applicant had 60 days to reapply. But many times, the loan officers, under pressure to reach quotas, would call only once or not at all, then withdraw or decline the application, the former loan workers said. They and their supervisors described computer queues clogged with tens of thousands of loan applications, and of overwhelmed employees being told to put efficiency above all else and callously dismiss the pleas of desperate people. “People were homeless, living in their cars,” said Young, now a bank loan officer. “People were running out of rental assistance. They didn’t have a place to go. They had worn out their favors with their families. And they needed to move on. And they would call and ask: ‘Could you please do anything you can to help us?’” “I couldn’t sleep,” he said. “I knew it wasn’t right.” Said Durtschi: “We had no compassion for these people. To our supervisors, it was all about production and we hurt a lot of people along the way.” A 2007 report from the SBA’s Office of the Inspector General, which performs independent reviews and audits of the agency, criticized SBA for canceling pending approved loans without warning. During one period in 2006, the report said, the agency’s Buffalo, N.Y., call center terminated 7,752 pending loans without notifying borrowers in advance. In many cases, the investigators found, no call had ever been made to the applicant to begin final processing. If a loan officer did manage to reach a borrower, the applicant was given 48 hours to fax documents to bring the loan to the closing phase. Often, the borrower didn’t have all the paperwork readily available. “Maybe you need a deed and it’s at the courthouse, but the courthouse is under water. The documentation is destroyed,” said Young, the former SBA loan officer. “Or maybe you need payroll stubs, and that information is gone. Now you’re told you have 48 hours to get it. That’s even if we reach you by phone. We have your old phone number. Sometimes we call, sometimes we don’t.” When borrowers requested additional time, the agency was unyielding, Young said. “We never budged,” he said. “It was a manufactured deadline that put undue stress on people.” “At the end of the 48 hours, you’re wiped out from our queue,” he said. “You didn’t exist.” ___ When a borrower did find the critical documents and fax them to Fort Worth, the paperwork would often get lost. The office had only a few fax machines to handle the crush. Receipt of the documentation was assured only if a loan officer waited by the machine to snag the papers. Bazile remembers faxing 50- to 70-page packets two or three times before someone at the processing center would acknowledge receipt. “How could something like that get lost?” she wondered. “It was a constant frustration.” Plus, the documents contained personal information, such as Social Security and bank account numbers. Martin recalled once arguing unsuccessfully with her supervisor in favor of approving a loan for a small business owner and being told: “Don’t think about it. Move on.” “They were ruthless, absolutely ruthless,” Martin said of her bosses. “We weren’t there to help the public.” Those same supervisors often conducted contests with cash prizes to reward loan officers who cleared the most applications, usually by rejecting as many as possible. One supervisor told the AP she won $100 for exceeding production quotas. “I would hear loan officers laughing about the loans they turned down,” Young said. “The same people kept winning.” In recent weeks, the AP found more than two dozen of the same supervisors still working in the Fort Worth office. But all of the current supervisors reached by the AP declined to comment, saying the agency prohibited them from talking. Others recall that productivity was the mantra at staff meetings. At one, a supervisor explained to loan officers how to get people off the phone. Use an egg timer, he said. When it goes off, hang up. “Your performance was measured on the number of files you closed,” said Bill Russell, a former loan officer and certified public accountant. “It wasn’t long until people discovered that to meet the quota, the easiest thing to do was just to deny the loan.” One supervisor who spoke to the AP on condition of anonymity out of fear she would lose her job said that on weekends fellow supervisors and other managers would order pizza and just empty the queue of applications. The extra sessions were called “Signoff Sunday,” she said. “It was all about getting these loans out of the system to make it appear like we were clearing up the backlog and helping people. But we weren’t helping people. What we were doing was saving our own jobs.” SBA’s Rivera questioned whether supervisors pushed loans through without review. “Obviously when you have 4,250 employees, you’re going to have some disgruntled employees,” he said. He said loan officers had to meet strict production quotas in line with the private sector. If they didn’t, they could be let go. But it was another campaign that created even more chaos in Fort Worth. By fall 2006, more than a year after Katrina, loans were still not moving quickly enough, former workers recalled. So SBA began “90-in-45,” a campaign to remove 90,000 loan applications from the queue in just 45 days. “There was no real incentive to approve a loan,” Young said. When borrowers found out their applications had been canceled, they would often call pleading for another chance, he said, adding that his supervisors wouldn’t let him help. “It was heart wrenching,” he said, fighting back tears. “There were some nights that my wife would ask, ‘What’s wrong with you?’ I’d sit there alone at the table, late at night, staring into space. Some nights I was up to 3 in the morning and I had to be up at 6.” ___ Over the past year, AP reporters visited dozens of Gulf Coast communities, even going door-to-door in two neighborhoods – in Waveland, Miss., and Chalmette, La. with high concentrations of SBA loans that were approved but never disbursed. Time and again, on streets where recovery has been hard to come by and where tall untended grass and cracked concrete foundations stand as reminders that many more people used to live and work here, the stories were remarkably consistent: A nightmare of lost paperwork; sudden and onerous deadlines; uncooperative, even combative loan officers at the other end of the phone line. People in these communities are fiercely independent and wary of asking the government for help. Many said they did so because Katrina was so thoroughly destructive that they had no choice. But many of those who recalled their battles with SBA said they dreaded the possibility of having to ask the agency for help ever again. Scott Peterson is still angry about the months he spent fighting with the SBA for a loan to reopen his flooded seafood restaurant in Waveland, a quiet beach town on the Mississippi coast that was nearly wiped off the map. He was rejected twice for a loan to repair the S&B Bar and Grill – even though he believed he qualified. He reopened in 2006, but not before maxing out his credit cards and borrowing money from his parents to rebuild. He says he did the best he could, but some of the windows on his restaurant are still boarded up and the roof leaks. Peterson is hurting again in a new way, this time because the oil spill has made it hard to find the seafood that draws his customers. Despite his resentment and lack of faith in the SBA, he’s contemplating making another request for help. “It’s going to be something to see when I apply again,” he said, shaking his head while stirring a pot of chicken gumbo on his kitchen stove. Bazile remembers how she became so upset dealing with the SBA process that she had to seek medical assistance. “I had no idea how overwhelming it was going to be,” said Bazile, 44, a former newspaper reporter who now works in the St. Bernard Parish president’s office. “My blood pressure shot up. My cardiologist asked me to stay home for a week or so, and so I did, but the problems didn’t go away.” Dealing with the agency became a full-time job for Bazile, who lives on a street in Chalmette that saw one of the highest concentrations of SBA activity along the coast. She took a seven-week leave from her job at The Times-Picayune to contend with the mounds of paperwork and battery of phone calls it took to secure the money to rebuild her home. More than once, a loan officer gave her a 48-hour deadline – out of the blue – to provide a required document or risk having her file closed. Phone messages went unreturned, and faxes to SBA mysteriously went missing. “It caused incredible emotional distress on me,” said a tearful Bazile. “Many, many times my husband said, ‘Just let it go. Let it go. We’ll be all right.’ And we could have walked away. But, in the end, that low interest rate was the very key to the way we’re living right now. They owed it to us, and I wasn’t going to let somebody bully me out of it.” ___ Many SBA applicants along the Gulf Coast had left their flooded homes and businesses and were living in tents, government-issued trailers, or with family and friends – sometimes far from home. In many cases, SBA officials had encouraged them to apply for loans. Few of the more than 200 interviewed said they had a smooth ride. Hassie Howell, who owned six rental properties on the same street in Chalmette, was approved for a $300,000 loan to fix up all six. He repeatedly called SBA to find out when he would receive the money. But each time he called, he said, he was transferred to another loan officer who wanted even more paperwork before the money could be released. When he sent in the documents, there were “more unexplained delays.” “More excuses,” he said. In the meantime, he was losing money. Unable to wait any longer, Howell sold two properties elsewhere in Chalmette and used the proceeds to begin rebuilding the rental units. When SBA called nearly a year later and told him it was ready to disburse the $300,000, Howell felt it was too little, too late. “I didn’t want anything to do with them,” he said. Today, the street is plagued by omnipresent concrete slabs and vacant decrepit homes. A neighboring street is a tangle of empty, garbage-strewn lots and shoulder-high weeds. Five of his homes have tenants. The community was stable before Katrina, Howell said. Now it is transient. “If I had gotten the money early, we would have been up and others would have returned,” said Howell, who now lives in Baton Rouge, La. “The whole experience was a nightmare.” ___ From the Fairhope Yacht Club’s wraparound porch, Schmitz watches boats bob before a brilliant orange-and-pink sunset and describes how the old clubhouse, a rambling, one-story structure, was destroyed by Katrina. That left members with a choice: Restore the facility to its former specs or build a new multistory clubhouse with amenities that could attract new members. They chose the latter. The new club’s $4 million price tag includes an SBA loan of about $1.5 million. The facility is double the size of the old building, with a new restaurant and bar and a swimming pool that alone cost nearly $300,000. The Fairhope Yacht Club reopened in 2008; these days there’s a waiting list to join. “For us, Katrina was an opportunity to build something bigger and better,” said Schmitz, a short, thin former teacher who looked ready for a regatta, with his khaki shorts, white sneakers and red pullover shirt emblazoned with the yacht club’s logo – a blue and white striped flag with the club’s initials. The yacht club had enough insurance to rebuild without SBA money. But without the federal help there would have been no upgrade. “I don’t see anything wrong with that,” Schmitz said. Yet SBA regulations state that loan recipients should rebuild properties only to pre-storm conditions. “Any improvements beyond pre-disaster condition is upgrading, and is not eligible,” according to SBA regulations. “Our program is set up to return you to your pre-disaster condition,” said Jay MacKenna, an SBA spokesman. “So if you had a 1,000-square-foot mobile home and that was totally destroyed, we could help you replace your 1,000-square-foot mobile home. We would not be providing you money to go out and buy a 2,000-square-foot mobile home.” There are certain exceptions, but they have to be authorized on a case-by-case basis. For example, the agency will allow an upgrade if an applicant uses their own money or borrows from a private lender to pay for the extra improvements. But agency officials have to check whether the borrower has the ability to repay the SBA loan and “any other debts.” Borrowers don’t always tell SBA about the extra expenditures, though, and the agency doesn’t always check. Schmitz said the club didn’t ask SBA if it could upgrade. But it was no secret; everyone in the community knew they were building a bigger yacht club. He said he never saw anyone from the SBA visit while the clubhouse was under construction. “We just told them we needed the money to rebuild. It was quick and fast and we didn’t have any problems,” he said. “It was a wonderful experience.” Before the money was disbursed, the agency verified Fairhope “had injected sufficient funds into the project” to meet the guidelines, said SBA spokeswoman Carol Chastang. “There was no indication anywhere in the file that the yacht club upgraded their facilities using SBA disaster loan proceeds,” she said in an e-mail. But she also said the yacht club had “completed much of the rebuilding with insurance and outside funding by the time it applied for the SBA disaster loan.” “What does that tell you about how the entire process worked? Did they really need the money? This violates the spirit of the rules,” said Gale Martin, one of the former SBA loan officers. For his part, Schmitz said the club’s members helped navigate the loan through the system. “You have to understand that we have people from all walks of life,” he said. “We have lawyers. We’ve got people who – loan officers, and all this – who all knew pretty much the inside track on all this stuff, and they took care of it for us.” ___ Associated Press writers Brian Skoloff, Becky Bohrer, Carrie Osgood, Peter Prengaman and the AP News Research Center contributed to this story. ___ The AP National Investigative Team can be reached at investigate (at) ap.org

Read the full article →

First Midwest Bancorp, Inc. Welcomes Two New Directors

August 24, 2010

ITASCA, IL–(Marketwire – August 24, 2010) –  First Midwest Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company” or “First Midwest”) ( NASDAQ : FMBI ), the holding company of First Midwest Bank, announced today the appointment of Phupinder S. Gill, President of CME Group, and Michael J. Small, President and Chief Executive Officer of Aircell Holdings, LLC to its Board of Directors effective immediately.

Read the full article →

First Midwest Bancorp, Inc. Welcomes Two New Directors

August 24, 2010

ITASCA, IL–(Marketwire – August 24, 2010) –  First Midwest Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company” or “First Midwest”) ( NASDAQ : FMBI ), the holding company of First Midwest Bank, announced today the appointment of Phupinder S. Gill, President of CME Group, and Michael J. Small, President and Chief Executive Officer of Aircell Holdings, LLC to its Board of Directors effective immediately.

Read the full article →

First Midwest Bancorp, Inc. Welcomes Two New Directors

August 24, 2010

ITASCA, IL–(Marketwire – August 24, 2010) –  First Midwest Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company” or “First Midwest”) ( NASDAQ : FMBI ), the holding company of First Midwest Bank, announced today the appointment of Phupinder S. Gill, President of CME Group, and Michael J. Small, President and Chief Executive Officer of Aircell Holdings, LLC to its Board of Directors effective immediately.

Read the full article →

First Midwest Bancorp, Inc. Welcomes Two New Directors

August 24, 2010

ITASCA, IL–(Marketwire – August 24, 2010) –  First Midwest Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company” or “First Midwest”) ( NASDAQ : FMBI ), the holding company of First Midwest Bank, announced today the appointment of Phupinder S. Gill, President of CME Group, and Michael J. Small, President and Chief Executive Officer of Aircell Holdings, LLC to its Board of Directors effective immediately.

Read the full article →

Video: Businessweek’s Burrows Discusses Apple TV Rental Plan: Video

August 24, 2010

Aug. 24 (Bloomberg) — Bloomberg Businessweek’s Peter Burrows talks with Melissa Long about Apple Inc.’s discussions to let iTunes users rent TV shows for 99 cents. Apple is in advanced talks with News Corp. to offer the service, according to three people familiar with the plan. CBS Corp. and Walt Disney Co., where Apple Chief Executive Officer Steve Jobs is a board member and the largest shareholder, also are in talks about joining the effort, the people say. (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Video: Rosen Says U.S. Housing Market Looks `Abysmal’: Video

August 24, 2010

Aug. 24 (Bloomberg) — Jeffrey Rosen, an economist at Briefing.com, talks with Bloomberg’s Melissa Long about the U.S. housing market. Sales of existing homes dropped a record 27 percent in July to a 3.83 million annual pace, the lowest in a decade of record keeping and worse than the most pessimistic forecast of economists surveyed by Bloomberg News, according to figures released today by the National Association of Realtors. (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Video: Noe Says U.S. Slow on Shallow-Water Drilling Permits: Video

August 24, 2010

Aug. 24 (Bloomberg) — Jim Noe, senior vice president and general counsel of Hercules Offshore Inc., talks with Bloomberg’s Peter Cook about the Obama administration’s pace of granting of permits to drill for oil in the shallow waters of the Gulf of Mexico. Noe said the U.S. has issued three permits since modifying a moratorium on offshore drilling in late May, compared with as many as five permits issued a week before the BP Plc well blowout in April. (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Video: Osborne Says BOJ Yen Intervention Not Guaranteed to Work: Video

August 24, 2010

Aug. 24 (Bloomberg) — Shaun Osborne, chief currency strategist at TD Securities Inc., talks with Bloomberg’s Julie Hyman about the outlook for Japan’s yen. The yen advanced to the strongest in 15 years versus the dollar and to its highest level against the euro since 2001 even after Prime Minister Naoto Kan told reporters “steep currency gains are undesirable.” (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Arin Crumley: YouTube, Not TheirTube

August 24, 2010

In 2006, Time Magazine named “you” Person of the Year. “You” are the individual users who create content for the internet, and post it on websites that host photos, videos, music and text–sites like YouTube, Facebook, MySpace, Vimeo, and Flickr. But your ability to create and post original content online is being threatened. Viacom sued YouTube in 2007 for $1 billion, claiming that YouTube should be responsible for policing its users’ content for copyright violations. The court found that YouTube expeditiously responds to copyright holders’ requests to remove infringing content and complies with the law. But the media giant has now appealed, seeking to subject YouTube (and other websites that host content) to billions of dollars of liability. If successful, the vibrant era of user-generated content as we know it could come to an abrupt end. If it is not enough for YouTube, MySpace and Flickr to respond within minutes to copyright holders’ requests, then what standard must these websites meet? According to Viacom, these sites must review, research and investigate the origins of each of the hundreds of thousands of videos uploaded to their sites each day and approve each individually in advance. Today we can post media online in mere minutes. Under Viacom’s proposed rules, however, it could take days or weeks, and if YouTube can’t figure out if the poster actually has all the rights (via license or otherwise), it should not be posted at all. We call ourselves the Sideshow Coalition because Viacom has called us a “sideshow.” In fact, we are today’s creators, distributing to the world an unprecedented quantity and variety of art and building our careers through free online distribution channels such as YouTube. Viacom apparently considers us marginal and irrelevant. Or perhaps it views our success as a threat to its business. We believe the public wants and values creative expression unfiltered and unmediated by major media corporations. Our work is not simply some distraction to be viewed on the way to the big show. Our videos have collectively been viewed about three billion times – and we are only a few dozen out of millions of users who have posted original content on YouTube. This enthusiasm for our work has enabled us to pursue careers in entertainment, and through YouTube channels we earn revenue from the videos we create. We emphatically support the protection of intellectual property; creating intellectual property is how most of us make a living. But our goal is to ensure that everyone has the ability to share and profit from their intellectual property, not just big corporations. We love the Web because it levels the playing field. Anyone with talent, internet access and a video camera can present his or her ideas. Before the internet, you either did business with major media companies on their terms or you did not earn a living from entertainment because you could not reach a mass audience. The internet has liberated us and millions of others from gatekeepers who control the traditional distribution channels for our work. We can now be our own television stations, our own record labels and our own publishers. We can also be our own newsmakers and non-profits, using sites like YouTube to achieve social change. People have used YouTube to increase voter turnout and registration in the United States, to spread awareness about the Iranian government’s human rights abuses and to raise money to feed the hungry. The “protections” Viacom seeks would benefit itself at the expense of “us”–millions of independent media producers and billions of consumers. To foster creativity, innovation, free expression and economic opportunity, we will continue to urge the court to preserve the freedom of the internet. The authors are part of the Sideshow Coalition, a group of creative individuals unaffiliated with a major corporation who post original content on YouTube.

Read the full article →

Robert L. Borosage: Boehner’s Plan: Half Baked

August 24, 2010

Rep. John Boehner, the perpetually tanned House Minority leader, unveiled his plan to get the economy going today in a speech before the Cleveland City Club. Hold on to your job — if he becomes Speaker, things will get worse. Understandably, Boehner said not a word about the policies that led to the Great Recession. In fact, he said not a word about the economic collapse. Instead, he argued only that America’s economy was in trouble because business was scared to death. It isn’t the worst recession since the Great Depression, the lack of demand and customers that is plaguing businesses; it is the fear of tax hikes and regulation. In response, Boehner detailed a five point plan to “break the ongoing economic uncertainty.” Three of the five points are basically rhetorical. He calls on Obama to pledge to veto any future tax increase. He calls on Obama to fire his economic team. And he pledge to eliminate the 1099 tax return mandate that requires small businesses to report any expenditure on goods and services over $600, an aggravation that Democrats are intent on reversing also. The last two points have greater substance. Boehner would keep tax rates where they are, opposing Obama’s plan to let the Bush tax cuts expire for couples making more than $250,000 a year, or the top 2% of Americans. The Center for Budget and Policy Priorities estimates this would add about $1 trillion to the deficit over the next 10 years. Second, he would impose an immediate cut of about 25% on domestic discretionary spending, returning it back to 2008 levels, repealing any further recovery spending. Later, he suggests that the cut with a “hard cap” (presumably for 3 years) would save $340 billion, recouping a little more than a third of his proposed top end tax cut. That’s it. (Later in the speech, Boehner promises to unveil a more complete agenda in the future, and suggests possibilities, including the conservative standards — less spending, more tax cuts, less regulation, and more corporate trade treaties. Details to come later.) There are some major problems with the Boehner plan. 1. It is a joke. We have over 25 million people unemployed, with an economy that is slowing. The Boehner response is to keep tax rates where they are for the rich, and cut all recovery spending, slashing 25% from domestic discretionary spending. We know two things about this program: It will kill more jobs than it creates; and it will add to, not subtract, from projected deficits. 2. It’s half baked. It is as if Boehner hasn’t noticed what is going on in this country over the last decades of conservative domination. Instead he would exacerbate the worst ruinous trends. For example: We suffer from the worst inequality ever. The top 1% pockets about 20% of all income, and has captured 2/3 of all income growth in the Bush years before the recession. Boehner’s extension of the Bush top end tax cuts will simply add to that in after-tax income. We suffer a costly and growing public investment deficit — in everything from sewers and roads, to education and training, to research and development — areas vital to sustaining a competitive private economy. Slashing non-defense discretionary spending — which includes spending on education, on energy, on the environment, on everything the government does outside of defense and entitlements like Social Security and Medicare — will only worsen that. (And the hints Boehner offers about future plans aren’t reassuring: More trade treaties that led to ruinous trade deficits that force us to borrow $2 billion a day, largely from Chinese and Japanese central bankers; less regulation in the face of what deregulation of the big banks did to the economy, to the citizens in the Gulf, in the coal mines, and in the grocery store buying eggs; turning Medicare into a voucher, and more.) Boehner became an instant YouTube celebrity for his “hell no you can’t” rant on health care reform. So it is understandable why he would want to offer voters some clue about what Republicans are for, not just what they are against. And no doubt the rhetoric of his speech has been dial tested and focused grouped to the last syllable. But as a plan to get the country going, a plan to put people to work, a plan even to “break the ongoing economic uncertainty,” this is just silly. The time would have been better spent working on his tan.

Read the full article →

Wendy N. Powell: From Boss to Bully: When It Has Gone Too Far?

August 24, 2010

I have been bullied, you may have been bullied. We all know who they are, but do we know how to deal with them? Joe was a very good egg. He was the most knowledgeable and reliable of the managers and was the “go-to” person for all of the workplace history. A new director with a reputation for behaving badly was hired and he wanted to clean house as soon as he arrived. “Out with the old, in with the new” was his motto. He would say ” I don’t care about the way we used to do it. We need to change everything.” What he meant was he didn’t want any old corporate bones in the bone yard. The new boss started riding Joe’s every move; he berated and insulted him, created assignments with unrealistic expectations and goals, and even threw things across the room in an angry rage. Joe became fearful, agitated, and unable to concentrate. He felt frozen and unable to get his work done. Joe’s co-workers became concerned about his health and recommended that he get some help. “The boss wants me to leave. What am I going to do?” he thought on the way to his doctor’s appointment. He got some blood pressure medicine and was off work for a few days to re-group. The boss called him constantly asking for updates of his assignments, yelling at him, criticizing his progress. Joe went to sleep that night and never woke up again. Of course, this is an extreme and tragic story but unfortunately, it is true. Common threads surface about workplace bullying in the recent suicide at the University of Virginia. Managing editor Kevin Morrissey committed suicide following many cries for help and allegations of workplace bullying. These are allegations, not absolute proof of a bully driving someone to end his life. He had, however, left many indications about his risk for suicide before he took his life. In this case, Morrissey killed himself on the university campus, a clear last message to the University. According to the Workplace Bullying Institute , workplace bullying is defined as: Repeated, health-harming mistreatment of one or more persons by one or more perpetrators that takes one or more of the following forms: • Verbal abuse • Offensive conduct/behaviors (including nonverbal) which are threatening, humiliating, or intimidating • Work interference — sabotage — which prevents work from getting done How often is there a bully in the midst? According to the 2007 Workplace Bullying Institute’s national scientific survey , 37 percent of adult Americans have reported being bullied at work. This daunting figure doesn’t include employees who are considered collateral damage. The bully can be a man or woman and is likely to be a boss. If bullying is a result of our legal statutory rights, then our anti-discrimination laws apply and legal action is possible. It has been estimated that only 20 percent of bullying cases fall into this category. But at this time, there is no law against the bullying behavior in the United States. Refer to The Healthy Workplace Bill (HWB) for a legislative campaign that encourages states to pass legislation to address workplace bullying issues. In this case, the HWB has not been introduced in the State of Virginia. WARNING SIGNS OF BULLYING: When workplace issues create an emptiness and hopelessness for resolution, common trends surface when people are in dire need for assistance or potential intervention The employee cries for help. This cry often goes out to colleagues who they ask for collaboration. • They often do not suffer in silence. As in the Morrissey case, the employee discussed his plight with colleagues and contacted authorities at the employer, actually at least 18 times. • The employee feels there are no alternatives, no way out of the employment situation. Particularly in our difficult job market, employees need to remain in their jobs because of limited alternatives. They feel hopeless. • The employee is in a constant feeling of anxiety and experiences a sense of doom, scared that negative things are to come. WHAT HUMAN RESOURCES AND ADMINISTRATORS CAN DO: What should administrators and Human Resource professionals do to assist people like Kevin Morrissey, who are crying for help? First and foremost, distressed employees need an avenue to discuss the allegations and realize that they have been heard. Most importantly, a distressed employee needs the opportunity to vent in quick order. Project an environment of calmness and provide assurance that is it okay to vent. Have an employee assistance program at your fingertips. Either have expert, trained, and credentialed specialists on staff to provide help to employees in distress or pursue a contracted service where you can refer employees. Remember, we can give attention to staff, assure them that they are being heard, but when it comes to clinical issues, refer them to the right people for assistance. This assistance can take on the form of referrals for medical assistance and monitoring of their progress. Ask the complainant specific questions that will help you to make your conclusions about the complaint and the course of action to correct the problem. Remember, you need clear facts and evidence to move forward with any resulting disciplinary action.In most cases, there is another story and you need to know what that is. Don’t assume that administrators or human resource professionals have the skills to handle these serious types of allegations and investigations. Contract a skilled professional to provide training and practice so they will be well prepared when the needs are. Communicate to all employees the expectation to comply with the values of the organization. Make it everyone’s responsibility to keep your workplace free from bullying and harassing behaviors. WHAT TO DO IF YOU ARE THE ONE BEING BULLIED: If you have been personally bullied at work, this information rings all too clear. I liken the bully to a management terrorist. Bullies shake your very core and keep you worrying about the next strike. You appreciate the moments between episodes and fear for your next attack. You look around for who may be watching your embarrassment.Bullying is often contagious. And they do like an audience. perpetrator. • Address the issue “head-on”. Shed light on the issue to make the bully cognizant of your troubles • Take the issue up the corporate chain. • Show your tenacity and keep the story alive. • Don’t forget this if your career they are messing with. What do you have to lose? About Wendy N. Powell With more than 25 years of human resource and management consulting experience, WENDY N. POWELL has spent most of her career advising managers at the University of Michigan as well as many public and private sector organizations. She is currently on the business faculty at both Palm Beach State College and the University of Phoenix. A member of the Society for Human Resource Management, she received a leadership award in 2002 from the Midwest College and University Professional Association for Human Resources. For more information, please visit: http://www.managementexperienceacquired.com .

Read the full article →

MerchantCircle Announces Navam Welihinda as Director of Finance

August 24, 2010

MOUNTAIN VIEW, CA–(Marketwire – August 24, 2010) –  MerchantCircle, the nation’s largest social network of local business owners, today announced that Navam Welihinda has joined the company as director of finance. Welihinda will lead the company’s financial management as MerchantCircle builds on its member base of more than 1.3 million merchants. Welihinda comes to MerchantCircle from Sierra Ventures, where he evaluated investment opportunities in the software sector, helped shape investment strategy, and provided portfolio companies with counsel on operational models and other capital raise strategies.

Read the full article →

Video: Grasso Discusses Boehner’s Call for Geithner Resignation: Video

August 24, 2010

Aug. 24 (Bloomberg) — Richard Grasso, former chief executive officer of the New York Stock Exchange, talks about U.S. House Minority Leader John Boehner’s call for President Barack Obama to fire Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner and the other remaining members of the president’s economic team. Grasso talks with Margaret Brennan on Bloomberg Television’s “InBusiness. (This is an excerpt of the full interview. Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Stephen Cannon: When Gen Y Speaks, Boomers Must Listen

August 24, 2010

Generation Y, the 16- to 33-year-old set, has long been known as the “everybody gets a trophy” generation – no one wins, no one loses and no one gets picked last. As the first members of this generation enter their 30s, a lot of boomers wonder how their young colleagues will cope with losing a client, making a bad deal or even getting fired. Some older businesspeople seem to secretly relish the idea that the next generation is in for a rude awakening when they learn that in life there are winners and losers, and sometimes you do get picked last – or not at all. I prefer to look at the positives that helicopter parenting and a focus on egalitarianism has given the millennials. They have a huge amount of self-confidence, a strong support structure and a belief in inclusion. All of these things will serve them well. I choose to focus on these things not because I’m an optimist at heart, but because anyone who denigrates or ignores Generation Y does so at his own peril, as our country is on the verge of a generational tipping point that will change society unlike anything we’ve seen in 50 years. Gen Y is the largest consumer group in U.S. history and will soon be as important – and eventually more important – than the Baby Boomers. It’s larger in size and, by the end of this decade, will be fueling the economy. It will have more spending power than any other generation, giving its members the ability to make or break brands simply by paying attention to them. Generally, marketers are taught to speak to audiences “in their own language.” But Generation Y doesn’t actually have its own language. Unlike other generations, Gen Y never really rebelled. Many of its members listen to their parents’ music, love the movies their folks grew up on and use the same products. Its members may communicate differently – through social media and texting instead of phone calls and email – but they want to be spoken to as adults not “young people.” Old world values matter to them. Traditional brands that try to focus on youthful pursuits are making a huge mistake. It turns out that what Generation Y is interested in is authenticity, longevity and a proven track record. I’ve been shocked to see young people get more absorbed in racing footage from the 1950s than they do with stunt driving from today. In the coming years, I think you’ll see automakers focus less on things like torque, speed and horsepower and more on craftsmanship, heritage and real-world concerns like safety and environmental impact. But regardless of the qualities you focus on, simply telling people the good things about your product is no longer enough. One major area in which Generation Y differs from its parents is its focus on experiences as opposed to material things. I recently went into several top business schools to ask for ideas about reaching millennials and what I kept hearing was “what unique experiences can you offer us?” They want to go behind the scenes. They want to have a voice and interact with decision makers. This unique access gives them social capital – something they can Tweet about or post photos of on their Facebook profiles. Give them this and you’ll win their support. Recently, we offered a few Millennials in our GenBenz online community a sneak preview test drive of our new GLK compact SUV. A week later, to our pleasant surprise, we found this on YouTube . If having an expensive new car in the driveway was the status symbol of the ’80s and ’90s, having a say in the design or marketing of a new car is the status symbol of today. This generation truly believes it can change the world. Why wouldn’t they think they can change our products? There have been numerous books written about the needs of Generation Y, but the biggest mistake marketers can make is to focus on generational differences rather than similarities. While they may LOL and OMG on Facebook and hashtag on Twitter, they ultimately want the same thing humans have wanted from the beginning of time – to be asked questions, knowing we will listen to their answers.

Read the full article →

Video: PNC’s Dye Says U.S. Home Prices May Fall Another 5%-10%: Video

August 24, 2010

Aug. 24 (Bloomberg) — Robert Dye, senior economist at PNC Financial Services Group Inc., talks with Bloomberg’s Mark Crumpton about July U.S. existing home sales and the outlook for the housing market. Sales of previously owned homes plunged 27 percent in last month, twice as much as forecast, to a 3.83 million annual pace, figures from the National Association of Realtors showed today. (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Dr. Philip Neches: Uncle Sam’s Turn-Around Fund

August 24, 2010

You and I hold an investment in the most unlikely turn-around fund. It is about to realize a huge profit with the upcoming public offering of General Motors. Yes, Uncle Sam is a very successful turn-around manager – with an enviable track record. You and I, along with every other taxpayer, are limited partners in this one-of-a-kind turn-around fund. There is no more difficult situation in business than a turn-around. Management must do three very hard things at once: close the unsuccessful parts of the business with minimum loss to shareholders stabilize the good parts of the business with minimum loss of customers, and re-ignite growth with minimum resources. The company must simultaneously lay off some people, retrain and redeploy other people, and hire new people. All this must happen in the vortex of negative publicity, poisonous morale, and customer cynicism. A raw start-up from nothing is a piece of cake by comparison. In my career in business, I’ve been involved with a number of turn-around situations. More ultimately failed than succeeded, but the ones that made it were some of my most gratifying experiences. Also some of the most remunerative. Former Wall Street Journal editor Paul Ingrassia gives a highly readable account of the decades-long run-up to the GM turn-around effort in Crash Course: The American Automobile Industry’s Road from Glory to Disaster . As GM prepares to leave public ownership by taxpayers for public ownership by investors, it is well to review the trail of short-sighted self-absorbed folly by generations of auto industry management, labor leadership, and the GM Board itself. Ingrassia’s book ends with the reluctant passage through Congress of the legislation enabling the government to become the active turn-around investor and manager of GM. But what an active manager Uncle became! GM shed the historic Oldsmobile and Pontiac brands, and sold off Hummer, Saab, and Saturn, reducing its domestic line-up from 9 labels to 4. Over 900 dealers, 7 plants, and 22,500 employees went away. $77.7 billion in debt was restructured: that’s more than the GDP of Iraq. The government even restructured the once-passive Board of Directors, bringing in interim Chairmen with stellar track records. Kent Kressa led Northrup-Grumman through the massive consolidation of the aerospace industry following the end of the Cold War. Ed Whitacre led SBC through the years of chaos and consolidation following the 1996 telecommunications industry deregulation. In the process, SBC acquired AT&T and took the name of the more recognized but less powerful company. Now, as GM primps to go back to the stock market, the Board brought in telecomm veteran Dan Ackerman to give a sense of permanence to the new potential investors. Any good turn-around manager searches its Rolodex for new leadership. But no private turn-around firm can match Uncle’s reach. Any good turn-around manager will give the new leadership a strong incentive to do a good job. But none can match the psychic reward that comes from serving your country. Only Uncle Sam can do that. When one adds the closures and divestitures GM made during bankruptcy with those made in the years leading up to the final crisis (Delco, GMAC, EDS, Hughes, Detroit Diesel), it looks like the first mission of a turn-around was accomplished. The company, though smaller, is now actually focused on making and selling motor vehicles. The distractions are gone. While the larger economy is still struggling to get out of recession/depression, GM is growing: sales, profits, and employment are up. The second goal of the turn-around may be in sight: stability of the core business. A lot of excitement, fueled by hope and hype, surrounds the introduction of GM’s electric vehicle, the Chevy Volt. We will know soon enough if the Volt will electrify GM customers and shareholders, but they already feel the tingle. It is too soon to call the third leg of the turn-around, an exciting new product, a success. But it is clear that GM made the investment while going through its other wrenching transitions. Uncle Sam has been here before. The government played a less hands-on role in the revival of Chrylser under Lee Iaccoca a generation ago. Before that, the government restructured the freight rail industry when it was in collapse. It is hard to imagine a modern economy without freight rail! So why is Uncle Sam such a good restructuring manager? Probably because nobody — liberal or conservative, labor or management, government or private sector — wants Uncle in the turn-around business on a permanent basis. We create a turn-around team for each effort, and disband it as soon as the industry in question shows signs of returning health. We refuse to build “institutional knowledge” of such things, as Japan does in its infamous Ministry of International Trade and Industry (MITI). We do it only when we are desperate, our back to the wall, time running out, disaster for the economy and the people just inches away. How very American.

Read the full article →

Biden Mocks Boehner’s Call For Summers’ And Geithner’s Firing: ‘Very Constructive’

August 24, 2010

Vice Presidet Joe Biden reacted with a bit of sniping sarcasm to House Minority Leader John Boehner’s (R-Ohio) suggestion on Tuesday that the president hit the reset button and fire his top two economic advisers. “After months of promising a look at his party agenda for his plans for America,” Biden said, “his chief proposal, when you look at it, apparently was that the president should fire his economic team. Very constructive advice and we thank the leader for that.” Speaking at an event touting the impact of the stimulus on the fields of science and technology, the vice president tailored the first portions of his remarks into a comprehensive rebuttal to Boehner’s speech earlier in the day. “Mr. Boehner and his party ran the economy and the middle class literally into the ground,” Biden said at one point. “I’m still waiting for what it is that they are for… I know what they are against. What I don’t know, other than a tax cut for the top two percent of the taxpayers in America, I don’t know what they are for.” The critiques echoed those offered by others in the Democratic Party, including several members of the House, who hosted a pre-buttal conference call mocking Boehner for a lack of substantive ideas for economic recovery. “John Boehner and the Republican leadership wouldn’t know a new idea if they tripped on it,” Rep. Debbie Wasserman-Schultz (D-Fla.) told reporters on a Monday conference call organized by the Democratic National Committee. But it was not anticipated that Boehner would call for the firing of both Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner and chief economic adviser Larry Summers. And with hopes of drowning out the Ohio Republican’s much-publicized address, the White House re-calibrated Biden’s remarks and alerted reporters to tune into the speech minutes before it happened. UPDATE : Here are some more excerpts from Biden’s remarks in which he goes after not only Boehner but also the Minority Leader’s deputy, NRCC Chair Pete Session (R-Tex.). Let’s just review a little history here: For eight years before we arrived, Mr. Boehner and his party ran this economy and the middle class into the ground. They took the $237 billion surplus they inherited from the Clinton Administration and left us with a $1.3 trillion deficit, and, in the process, quadrupled the national debt – all before we had turned on the lights in the West Wing. They gave free rein to the special interests to write their own rules at the expense of everybody else. And the sum total of it was the greatest economic crisis since the Great Depression–a crisis that wreaked havoc on families and businesses across this country–a crisis from which we are still digging out. The head of their campaign committee, Representative Pete Sessions, said that if they were to take control of Congress this fall–which, by the way, they won’t–that they would go back to “the exact same agenda” they were pushing before President Obama took office. They think the policies they had in place during the Bush years–the ones Mr. Boehner helped craft and sell–were the right ones. Well, let me tell you, there are millions and millions of Americans who saw their paychecks shrink or their jobs, houses, and savings vanish. Mr. Boehner is nostalgic for those good old days… the American people are not. They don’t want to go back. They want to move forward.

Read the full article →

nSight Announces New Vice President of eLearning Services

August 24, 2010

Lee Stayton Helps Clients Improve Business Effectiveness With Creative eLearning Solutions

Read the full article →

8 Cities Where Home Prices Fell The FASTEST In The Last Year (PHOTOS)

August 24, 2010

If you’re still reeling from today’s grim data from the National Association of Realtors , which reported that sales of previously-occupied homes fell to a 15-year low, you’re not alone. As the real estate market continues to struggle — and begins to account for the expired first-time home buyer tax credit — there’s still a massive amount of ” shadow inventory ” dragging prices down. In fact, according to Calculated Risk, there’s 12.5 months of housing supply in the market , more than double the supply seen in a typical market. In comments to the AP, Paul Dales, U.S. economist with Capital Economics, put it this way: “With the increasingly inevitable double-dip in prices yet to come, things could yet get a lot worse.” To give you an idea of some of the hardest-hit markets across the country, we’ve compiled a snapshot of eight markets that showed the worst year-over-year declines in prices and sales of single-family homes as of July, according to the NAR’s figures. Which market will rebound? Check them out and vote below.

Read the full article →

Elizabeth Cordry: Why Fashion Seemingly Snubs the Internet: A Defensive

August 24, 2010

It is a truth universally acknowledged that the fashion industry has been notoriously slow to catch on to digital media. The few brands that have taken tentative steps towards using the internet to its full advantage, such as Burberry and Chanel, are being lauded as progressive, but when compared to other industries fashion is still woefully behind. From journalism and retail, to the back-end of wholesale buying, the fashion industry has on the whole squeaked along in the same way that it has for many years. Many observers blame this state of affairs on the industry’s concern for maintaining exclusivity; other say the internet simply is too ugly, not “on-brand” for high-end companies. These arguments have merits, but I believe they slow the process rather than stall it. It is possible that there is also a deeper structural issue in the industry that explains much of the trepidation. The fashion industry is one of the few creative industries that has never had to rely on technology to distribute its product. The film industry has navigated the transition from VCRs to DVDs to video downloads from a number of different devices. The music industry has transitioned from records to cassettes to CDs to music downloads. They have also long understood the value of creating content in a different medium, with Michael Jackson’s “Thriller” awakening the industry to the power of video. The fashion industry, on the other hand, has not transitioned in the same way. Clothes are still sold primarily in stores, where customers can have tangible access to the fabrics and fits. Perhaps more significantly, fashion still photography and the print editorial have long been the central medium for fashion journalism. All this adds up to an industry-wide lack of experience with, and knowledge of, technological developments. There is an argument to be made that it is this knowledge gap that is the most significant factor in slowing the transition to the online medium. Certainly the argument against selling clothes online is a strong one. It is hard to see how to fully communicate the value of a garment you can’t touch or try on. Moreover, clothes often just don’t look as good on a screen as they do on a body. However, what you lose in an up-close, physical, view of the dress and a luxurious store environment, you gain in the ability to communicate context, design inspiration, manufacturing background and the quality of the product. People who make this argument are forgetting that print magazines have been inspiring purchases since they were born, a sure sign that you don’t always need to see it on a hanger. The astounding success of Net-a-Porter also does a lot to disprove this theory. Print editorial seems to be the medium that is more at fault for their lack of internet adventures, although the defense here is strong too. The argument that editorial photographs do not translate as well on screen is true — they just don’t. But there seems to have been surprisingly little progress made in the realm of editorial video. All you need to see is the first ten minutes of “Breakfast at Tiffany’s” to understand the power of film in selling a look. What the challenge seems to be here is not the production, but the method of distribution. Fashion on TV has become associated with cheesy reality programming, such as “The Rachel Zoe Project,” “Project Runway” and “The Hills.” And the internet is, well, intimidating. This comes back to the central argument: industry leaders, having never had to dip their manicured toes into anything digital before, are struggling with a lack of experience. They are having a hard time understanding the power of the internet, let alone figuring out how to overcome the many challenges it provides. For there are many. Brands that have a very clear identity and idea of how to communicate themselves in traditional media are having to reinvent their message online. There is no room for error in branding, and they are going to get it right. The problem of the categorical ugliness of most of the internet is compounded by its new association with off-price sale sites like Gilt Groupe, and for the fact that when one thinks of online fashion journalism, one’s mind turns to 13 year old bloggers rather than to established industry authorities. But as the opportunity cost of staying offline has grown, these problems have turned from barriers of entry to challenges to overcome, and will in no way block future growth of the fashion industry online. The industry is made of the kind of people who can brand the be-jesus out of a PVC handbag. They’ll figure out the short-term issues with translating their brand online. Thus there is an argument to be made that the industry is not fearful, nor snobbish, nor ignorant. They simply lack the experience, and are aware of the fact. The fashion industry is simply biding their time, educating themselves, and planning with rigorous accuracy their branding attack. Elizabeth Cordry works in retail and online development at Rag & Bone in New York. She is the author of the blog www.fashionconnected.com , focusing on the fashion industry’s transition to the online world.

Read the full article →

Lloyd Chapman: Obama Refusing to Back Private Sector Jobs Bill

August 24, 2010

President Barack Obama is refusing to back a bill that could create millions of jobs in the private sector. The bill, the Fairness and Transparency in Contracting Act, H.R.2568, was introduced by Georgia Congressman Hank Johnson last May . The American Small Business League (ASBL) wrote the original draft of H.R. 2568. The bill is designed to stop the federal government from diverting over $100 billion a year in federal small business contracts to Fortune 500 firms and many of the largest businesses in Europe. Since 2003, a series of federal investigations have found billions of dollars a month in federal small business contracts have been diverted to firms like Lockheed Martin, Boeing, Northrop Grumman, Raytheon, General Dynamics, Bechtel, Dell Computer and Xerox. Corporate giants from around the world that have received U.S. government small business contracts include Rolls-Royce, British Aerospace (BAE), French giant Thales Communications, Ssangyong Corporation headquartered in Seoul, South Korea and Finmeccanica SpA, which is located in Italy and has 73,000 employees. A recent investigation by Stars and Stripes Magazine found the federal government had awarded over $41.6 billion in small business contracts to “miscellaneous foreign contractors.” H.R. 2568 would stop the federal government from reporting contract awards to publicly traded firms and foreign owned companies as small business awards. The bill is based on language in the Small Business Act, which states that a small business must be “independently owned” in order to receive federal small business contracts. If President Obama were to sign H.R. 2568 into law, or pass by executive order, over $100 billion in existing federal infrastructure spending would be redirected to legitimate small businesses in the private sector. Since the bill requires no new spending or tax increases, it is deficit neutral. The Obama Administration had estimated that for every billion dollars in infrastructure spending, 40,000 new jobs would be created . Based on those projections, if H.R. 2568 were to become law, over four million new jobs could be created. The ASBL points to H.R. 2568 as being far superior to the Obama Administration’s $30 billion small business lending bill. As opposed to a one-time infusion of $30 billion in loans, H.R. 2568 would inject over $100 billion a year in federal contracts into the small business economy for decades to come.

Read the full article →

Shawna Vercher: Under Secretary Francisco Sanchez Briefs FL Leaders On Exports

August 24, 2010

TAMPA, FL – Under Secretary of Commerce for International Trade Francisco Sanchez made his first trip home to Tampa with a message for Florida leaders: make exporting a top priority. “Our future is based, in large part, on trade,” said Sanchez as he addressed a crowd of approximately 250 heads of business, agriculture, aerospace and economic development. Sanchez’ trip comes just months after President Obama signed the Executive Order for the National Export Initiative . During his January State of the Union Address Obama stated his goal to double economic exports in the next five years. Doing so, Obama said, will support nearly two million higher-paying jobs. As the man tasked with ensuring that the NEI goal is met, Sanchez is currently traveling the country to show businesses and government entities exactly what needs to happen in order for exports to increase. Sanchez emphasized that small and medium-sized businesses would be the key to reaching the NEI goal. Currently most of the trading from those businesses is targeted to Mexico and Canada, but Sanchez advises business owners to consider emerging markets, such as China, Brazil and India, and what he calls “Next Tier” markets, including Vietnam, Saudi Arabia and Indonesia. The newly-formed Export Initiative Cabinet has also partnered with shipping providers including FedEx, UPS and the U.S. Postal Service to target those businesses already exporting at some level. Those businesses that show export activity are then proactively contacted and invited to participate in a training program to see how they can increase their capacity or get “export ready” for additional markets. While the NEI has already demonstrated some success – resulting in approximately $11.5 billion of commercial contracts in the last seven months – there are many hurdles that will have to be overcome. First, Sanchez and his team will need to ensure that trade laws are vigorously enforced while still “leveling the playing field” for American companies to compete for contracts. Sanchez emphasized that he feels that one of the biggest barriers to exports is corruption and stated that the Export Initiative Cabinet is already deploying a strategy of commercial diplomacy so that other countries are following suit in the crack-down of illegal trade practices. The other major dilemma for many businesses looking to export is a lack of credit in the marketplace. While the SBA is lending to some export-ready businesses, Sanchez is calling on private banks to open their doors to those wishing to begin or increase trade. Specifically, Sanchez cited Sun Trust as a national leader in export lending and encouraged other banks to follow their lead and, “…Seize the moment of economic rebuilding.” “Tampa’s roots in trade are the blue print for the future,” Sanchez said. “If you are not exporting then you do so at your own ill.” Shawna Vercher is an online news correspondent and president of The Society of Successful Women, a national advocacy group that champions the success of women globally. To learn more about Shawna or how you can attend the 2010 SSW Leadership Summit on October 8th, visit www.thessw.com or reach out to her on Facebook .

Read the full article →

Video: BGC Partners’ Colin Gillis Likes Apple, Microsoft: Video

August 24, 2010

Aug. 24 (Bloomberg) — Colin Gillis an analyst at BGC Partners LP, talks about the outlook for technology stocks, including Apple Inc., Microsoft Corp. and Google Inc. Gillis speaks with Margaret Brennan on Bloomberg Television’s “InBusiness”. (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Video: BGC Partners’ Colin Gillis Likes Apple, Microsoft: Video

August 24, 2010

Aug. 24 (Bloomberg) — Colin Gillis an analyst at BGC Partners LP, talks about the outlook for technology stocks, including Apple Inc., Microsoft Corp. and Google Inc. Gillis speaks with Margaret Brennan on Bloomberg Television’s “InBusiness”. (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Richard ‘Skip’ Bronson: Homeless and Empty Homes — an American Travesty

August 24, 2010

About 3.5 million US residents (about 1% of the population), including 1.35 million children, have been homeless for a significant period of time. Over 37,000 homeless individuals (including 16,000 children) stay in shelters in New York every night. This information was gathered by the Urban Institute , but actual numbers might be higher. Fox Business estimates, there are 18.9 million vacant homes across the country. 3.5 million people without homes; 18.9 million homes without residents. While an array of legal and logistical obstacles present themselves, the math is staggering. It’s time to sort out the regulations and rates that would facilitate the solution: turning empty houses into homes for those in need. While subprime loans have justly captured much of the ink as the culprit, overdevelopment is a major factor in the dramatic number of vacancies there are today. These are not just the homes of people who took on a mortgage they couldn’t afford; these are newly constructed houses without a buyer on the horizon. It’s not about taking a residence from someone who can’t pay his or her bills and giving it to another person who can’t make payments either, it’s about using resources we have in excess. I’ve been in real estate development for quite some time, enough to know that regardless of which political party is in charge, the market will follow the same cycle: demand, saturation and then glut. A suburb will start to attract homeowners, developers will react by building new homes in that area, and inevitably the supply will far outpace the demand. I’ve seen it happen time and time again. Usually the cycle ends through absorption, after a lull the homes are eventually sold and the train starts rolling again. However, with the current economic climate, we appear poised to remain in the glut portion of the cycle for an inordinate amount of time. Houses are unlike most products; they generally don’t depreciate with time and use. A house will not suffer from wear and tear the way a car will. Actually, the opposite is true. An empty residence will quickly go to seed. If you lived in a neighborhood with an abandoned house you’ll know what I mean. Without someone to take care of it, a property will decline steeply. But with someone living in the house…actually taking care of them…well, that’s a far better situation. No one benefits from an empty house. I’m not advocating giving houses away — such a move would create a host of political and fiscal problems — but government should be working toward a solution to match up the empty homes with those who need a roof to live under. A homeless population equivalent to the size of Los Angeles is unacceptable, and with over five times as many empty houses, we have not only a moral obligation but also an economic imperative to come up with a creative way to fix this travesty.

Read the full article →

Fawn Germer: "Success Is Always Temporary, Failure Lasts Much Much Longer"

August 24, 2010

Last week, I returned from a speaking tour of Asia where American bravado met Chinese humility. I am a leadership and motivation speaker who tells people to expect success, make decisions with confidence and to advertise their strengths and wins. That is the exact opposite of the Chinese way, which is to be humble and sense that failure looms. I just got an e-mail from my new friend, Elmer Cheng, who is senior manager of product development for Polygroup — the company that manufactures most of the artificial Christmas trees and backyard swimming pools in the U.S. He is the 24-year-old son of Paul Cheng, the patriarch and founder of the company. When I was in Hong Kong, I interviewed the family for a book I am writing about leadership, globalization and the Chinese way. I woke up to an e-mail today where Elmer gave me something significant to ponder. “We do not know how to handle praise very well,” he wrote of the Chinese people. “We are always unsure how to respond and it is almost borderline embarrassing. Of course, praise is always welcome but in practical terms, some Chinese may see it as useless, because receiving it does not teach you how to improve or maintain success. Receiving criticism on the other hand, gives you a path of what needs to be done. What drives us is the fear of failure and not a moment of praise. Success is always temporary, failure lasts much much longer.” That is the exact opposite of what American business leaders are coached to do. While it seems a little dark, this Chinese concept interests me because, for them, it seems like it is an equally effective model for success. They obviously are doing something that works. Last year, Polygroup was recognized as Walmart’s supplier of the year for the fifth time. I don’t imagine I’d get much business as a motivational speaker speaker on leadership if I stood in front of major corporations telling people to hunker down and fear failure. While some of the American business leaders I know don’t brag on themselves, few will underrate or abbreviate what they have done. When I interviewed many business people in China and Taiwan, almost all minimized their achievements. When I would ask them to summarize their successes, I got a lot of silence and stares — not because they didn’t know, not because their achievements were classified information, but because that simple, ice-breaking question caused real discomfort for them. I’d been told that the Chinese people were humble, but I never expected that humility to be so pronounced. Would they be more successful if they stopped fearing failure and started pounding on their chests saying, “I’m successful! I’m wonderful! And, doggone it, people like me!” I don’t know. The Law of Attraction, which says our thoughts create our reality, has spawned a self-help industry in the U.S. where people have tapped into the their inner guru to remind themselves that anything is possible if they expect success. Elmer Cheng showed me that much is possible by respecting failure and shutting up about the victories. I told him I am going to post an article about his thoughts on the Huffington Post, one of America’s top ten websites. His response? “You can use my quote but can I remain anonymous?” I told him it is important for me to use his name so readers will know I didn’t make anything up. Reluctantly, he agreed. Humble.

Read the full article →

‘Ebonics’ Translators Needed By Justice Department

August 24, 2010

The Smoking Gun (via Gawker ) reports that the Justice Department is looking to hire translators fluent in ‘ebonics’ to help monitor, transcribe and translate conversations recorded in drug investigations. The DEA is seeking a total of nine translators to enable the department to use their investigative technology to maximum effectiveness: …while “technology plays a major role in the DEA’s efforts, much of its success is increasingly dependent upon rapid and meticulous understanding of foreign languages used in conversations by speakers of languages other than English and in the translation, transcription and preparation of written documents.” The department’s backlog of unintelligible ‘ebonics’ transcripts would be a great story line for ” The Wire ,” but sadly that show has ended.

Read the full article →

Video: Woolfolk Says Yen `Not Nearly as Strong as We Think’: Video

August 24, 2010

Aug. 24 (Bloomberg) — Michael Woolfolk, senior currency strategist at Bank of New York Mellon Corp., talks about the outlook for the yen and U.S. economy. Woolfolk speaks with Margaret Brennan on Bloomberg Television’s “InBusiness.” (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Video: Woolfolk Says Yen `Not Nearly as Strong as We Think’: Video

August 24, 2010

Aug. 24 (Bloomberg) — Michael Woolfolk, senior currency strategist at Bank of New York Mellon Corp., talks about the outlook for the yen and U.S. economy. Woolfolk speaks with Margaret Brennan on Bloomberg Television’s “InBusiness.” (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Video: Markus Schomer Discusses July U.S. Existing Home Sales: Video

August 24, 2010

Aug. 24 (Bloomberg) — Markus Schomer, chief economist at Pinebridge Investments, discusses U.S. existing home sales for July and the outlook for the housing market and economy. Sales slumped more than forecast and the number of unsold houses swelled, evidence the market is depressed by foreclosures and limited job growth. Schomer talks with Margaret Brennan on Bloomberg Television’s “InBusiness.” (This is an excerpt of the full interview. Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Video: Markus Schomer Discusses July U.S. Existing Home Sales: Video

August 24, 2010

Aug. 24 (Bloomberg) — Markus Schomer, chief economist at Pinebridge Investments, discusses U.S. existing home sales for July and the outlook for the housing market and economy. Sales slumped more than forecast and the number of unsold houses swelled, evidence the market is depressed by foreclosures and limited job growth. Schomer talks with Margaret Brennan on Bloomberg Television’s “InBusiness.” (This is an excerpt of the full interview. Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Guitar Center, Inc. Announces Executive Succession Plan

August 24, 2010

WESTLAKE VILLAGE, CA–(Marketwire – August 24, 2010) –   Guitar Center, Inc. today announced a management succession plan to be implemented during the fourth quarter of 2010. Under this plan, Greg Trojan, presently President and Chief Operating Officer, will assume the position of Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Trojan will also remain a member of Guitar Center’s Board of Directors. Marty Albertson, presently Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, will step down as Chief Executive Officer but will remain as non-executive Chairman of the Board.

Read the full article →

Video: Regalado Says Miami Is Bringing Downtown `Back to Life’: Video

August 24, 2010

Aug. 24 (Bloomberg) — Miami Mayor Tomas Regalado talks about the city’s budget deficit and property market. Regalado, speaking with Betty Liu on Bloomberg Television’s “In the Loop,” also discusses the impact of LeBron James’ signing with the Miami Heat on the city’s economy. (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Video: Regalado Says Miami Is Bringing Downtown `Back to Life’: Video

August 24, 2010

Aug. 24 (Bloomberg) — Miami Mayor Tomas Regalado talks about the city’s budget deficit and property market. Regalado, speaking with Betty Liu on Bloomberg Television’s “In the Loop,” also discusses the impact of LeBron James’ signing with the Miami Heat on the city’s economy. (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Video: Lilico Sees ‘Rapid Growth’ for U.K. Economy Through 2011

August 24, 2010

Aug. 24 (Bloomberg) — Andrew Lilico, chief economist at Policy Exchange, and Charles Davis, an economist at the Centre for Economics and Business Research, talk about the U.K. recovery and the outlook for economic growth in 2011. They talk with Maryam Nemazee on Bloomberg Television’s “The Pulse.”

Read the full article →