September 2010

WI Harper Advisory Board Adds Expertise in Health Care and Greentech

September 27, 2010

WuXi Pharmatech Founder Dr. Ge Li and Environmental Expert Dr. Gordon Huang Bring Deep Industry Insights to Successful Private Equity Firm

Read the full article →

Video: Beveridge Discusses China-Russia Energy Deals, Prices: Video

September 27, 2010

Sept. 27 (Bloomberg) — Neil Beveridge, an analyst at Sanford C. Bernstein & Co. in Hong Kong, talks about energy cooperation between China and Russia. Russian President Dmitry Medvedev is on a three-day visit to China to diversify trade between the two countries. Beveridge speaks with Susan Li on Bloomberg Television’s “First Up.” (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Robert Reich: Republican Economics as Social Darwinism

September 26, 2010

John Boehner, the Republican House leader who will become Speaker if Democrats lose control of the House in the upcoming midterms, recently offered his solution to the current economic crisis: “Liquidate labor, liquidate stocks, liquidate the farmer, liquidate real estate. It will purge the rottenness out of the system. People will work harder, lead a more moral life.” Actually, those weren’t Boehner’s words. They were uttered by Herbert Hoover’s treasury secretary, millionaire industrialist Andrew Mellon, after the Great Crash of 1929. But they might as well have been Boehner’s because Hoover’s and Mellon’s means of purging the rottenness was by doing exactly what Boehner and his colleagues are now calling for: shrink government, cut the federal deficit, reduce the national debt, and balance the budget. And we all know what happened after 1929, at least until FDR reversed course. Boehner and other Republicans would even like to roll back the New Deal and get rid of Barack Obama’s smaller deal health-care law. The issue isn’t just economic. We’re back to tough love. The basic idea is to force people to live with the consequences of whatever happens to them. In the late 19th century it was called Social Darwinism. Only the fittest should survive, and any effort to save the less fit will undermine the moral fiber of society. Republicans have wanted to destroy Social Security since it was invented in 1935 by my predecessor as labor secretary, the great Frances Perkins. Remember George W. Bush’s proposal to privatize it? Had America agreed with him, millions of retirees would have been impoverished in 2008 when the stock market imploded. Of course Republicans don’t talk openly about destroying Social Security, because it’s so popular. The new Republican “pledge” promises only to put it on a “fiscally responsible footing.” Translated: we’ll privatize it. Look, I used to be a trustee of the Social Security trust fund. Believe me when I tell you Social Security is basically okay. It may need a little fine tuning but I guarantee you’ll receive your Social Security check by the time you retire even if that’s forty years from now. Medicare, on the other hand, is a huge problem and its projected deficits are truly scary. But that’s partly because George W. Bush created a new drug benefit that’s hugely profitable for Big Phrma (something the Republican pledge conspicuously fails to address). The underlying problem, though, is health-care costs are soaring. Repealing the new health-care legislation would cause health-care costs to rise even faster. In extending coverage, it allows 30 million Americans to get preventive care. Take it away and they’ll end up in far more expensive emergency rooms. The new law could help control rising health costs. It calls for medical “exchange” that will give people valuable information about health costs and benefits. The public should know certain expensive procedures only pad the paychecks of specialists while driving up the costs of insurance policies that offer them. Republicans also hate unemployment insurance. They’ve voted against every extension because, they say, it coddles the unemployed and keeps them from taking available jobs. That’s absurd. There are still 5 job seekers for every job opening, and unemployment insurance in most states pays only a small fraction of the full-time wage. Social insurance is fundamental to a civil society. It’s also good economics because it puts money in peoples’ pockets who then turn around and buy the things that others produce, thereby keeping those others in jobs. We’ve fallen into the bad habit of calling these programs “entitlements,” which sounds morally suspect — as if a more responsible public wouldn’t depend on them. If the Great Recession has taught us anything, it should be that.anyone can take a fall through no fault of their own. Finally, like Hoover and Mellon, Republicans want to cut the deficit and balance the budget at a time when a large portion of the workforce is idle. This defies economic logic. When consumers aren’t spending, businesses aren’t investing and exports can’t possibly fill the gap, and when state governments are slashing their budgets, the federal government has to spend more. Otherwise, the Great Recession will turn into exactly what Hoover and Mellon ushered in — a seemingly endless Great Depression. It’s also cruel. Cutting the deficit and balancing the budget any time soon will subject tens of millions of American families to unnecessary hardship and throw even more into poverty. Herbert Hoover and Andrew Mellon thought their economic policies would purge the rottenness out of the system and lead to a more moral life. Instead, it purged morality out of the system and lead to a more rotten life for millions of Americans. And that’s exactly what Republicans are offering yet again. Robert Reich is the author of Aftershock: The Next Economy and America’s Future , now in bookstores. This post originally appeared at RobertReich.org .

Read the full article →

Affinion To Raise 325M In Bond Sale

September 26, 2010

Affinion Group a global customer engagement solutions provider is planning to raise about 350 million in a sale of senior notes

Read the full article →

N America Yawns At Potential ArcelorMittal TK Stainless Spinoffs

September 26, 2010

ArcelorMittal SA and ThyssenKrupp AG have both expressed interest in spinning off their stainless steel divisions although the moves will have little direct impact on the North American market industry sources said

Read the full article →

Fitch Downgrades Older ReRemics82328232

September 26, 2010

Fitch Ratings has downgraded 70 of the US RMBS resecuritization trusts rated below BB that were issued before 2008

Read the full article →

Mortgage Apps Fall Amid Feds Growth Concern

September 26, 2010

Mortgage applications in the US fell for the third week in a row as the economic recovery struggles to gain momentum and unemployment continues to weigh on the housing market according to Bloomberg

Read the full article →

BofJ Officials Signal Possible Policy Easing Ahead

September 26, 2010

A member of the Bank of Japans policy committee suggested on Wednesday that further easing of monetary policy could be in the works if the economic recovery fails to gain momentum according to The Wall Street Journal

Read the full article →

Mattel Raises 500M In Note Sale

September 26, 2010

American toy company Mattel has sold 500 million of senior unsecured notes in two parts

Read the full article →

GM Reduces Offering To 810B

September 26, 2010

General Motors has reduced the value of its stock offering

Read the full article →

Gerdau Raises 125B In Debt Issue

September 26, 2010

Brazilian steel company Gerdau has sold 125 billion of senior unsecured notes

Read the full article →

General Growth Hires Banks For Share Sale

September 26, 2010

General Growth Properties has appointed a group of banks to sell 225 billion of shares

Read the full article →

Freescale Semiconductor Raises 750M

September 26, 2010

US semiconductor maker Freescale Semiconductor has sold 750 million of senior unsecured notes

Read the full article →

Evercores Washington Ties Help The Firm Gain Perspective

September 26, 2010

Flash back to January 1977 Jimmy Carter had just been sworn in as the 39th president and just like today the US was facing some daunting economic problems It fell to young Ralph Schlosstein a deputy assistant secretary of the Treasury now president and CEO of Evercore Partners to keep the lights on in New York City

Read the full article →

Berkshire Cuts Moodys Stake To 12

September 26, 2010

Warren Buffetts Berkshire Hathaway has lowered its stake in credit rating firm Moodys to 289 million shares

Read the full article →

Jobless Claims Increase As Existing Home Sales Gain

September 26, 2010

New claims for unemployment benefits unexpectedly jumped higher in the week ending Sept18 after two weeks of declines underscoring the continuing fragility of the US economic recovery according to Reuters

Read the full article →

US China Leaders Clash Over Yuan

September 26, 2010

Political leaders from the US and China clashed on Thursday in the latest flurry of debate over appreciation of the Chinese currency which had been artificially pegged against the dollar until June according to Reuters

Read the full article →

Avis Ups Dollar Thrifty Offer To 16B

September 26, 2010

US car rental company Avis Budget Group has sweetened its offer for Dollar Thrifty Automotive Group by 12

Read the full article →

Brett King: Bye Bye Tellers – Hello Branch 2.0

September 26, 2010

Given the challenges of branch banking today, there’s a bunch of innovations taking place in respect to “Engagement Banking” within the branch property and it’s clear that many banks feel the branch environment has to change to stimulate different activity in the branch. In BANK 2.0 I classify this need to change the engagement in this way: “The core function of the branch moving forward will be about establishing the relationship with the customer at inception, and extending that relationship through an advisory sales process and excellent customer support systems. It is conceivable that all of the transactional elements within a branch will be moved to automated banking within electronic banking centres, automated branches, ATMs or the Internet within the next 10 years. What then is left? The face-to-face, value-add of a real, live human interaction.” Chapter 3 – Rebuilding the Branch One Customer at a Time, BANK 2.0 So I wanted to take a quick snapshot at some true innovation in branch design and deployment today. I’m not talking about a fresh repaint, some new plastic signage, and more laptops and kiosks around the branch, I’m talking about something fundamentally different for customers. The Flagship Luxury Engagement Model There’s something about walking into a Louis Vuitton or Versace Luxury store, the expansive space of Virgin’s flagship store in London (Oxford Street), or the wonderment of the Apple Store in Manhattan or London. A retail experience like this is just begging for customers to visit you. On the other hand the traditional branch is just not, well… attractive. Design is an under leveraged resource in attracting and engaging customers today. Some banks, however, have tried to change that. Have a look at these innovators in branch design, and say goodbye to the high-counter, bulletproof glass paradigm: CheBanca! – Milan, Italy Where’s the teller? Nope…not here either More great photos here… Deutsche Bank Q110 – Berlin, Germany Where’s the teller – not here either.. . Engagement Banking with Microsoft Surface Tech More great photos here… Some other great examples of branch design for the low-counter, sales engagement model include Jyske Bank ,and an innovative explanation of branch function redesign from Grey Architecture for “Info Bank”. The POD concept Clearly many banks see the “POD” or a customer engagement area as a key component of branch design moving forward. This will be either through ‘stations’ or sales pods designed for customers to sit in privacy with a relationship manager to discuss their needs. Here are demonstrations of the two core concepts in deployment today: The teller ‘pod’ with stations with some transactional capability The ‘sales’ pod – maximizing the face-to-face engagement Taking Design Too far?? But some take it too far – like this example from HSBC at Design Miami 08 where the temporary branch/vip lounge looked more like a farmyard than a bank…The point is – it’s not about design as the sole criteria, it’s about the engagement. The digitally-enabled branch We already saw Microsoft Surface technology enabled in Deutsche’s Q110 branch – there are a bunch of other banks who are doing the same. In the video below you can see a discussion from the Microsoft Surface team on a possible Financial Services application, or click through to the Razorfish app on Microsoft Surface. Microsoft Surface Financial Services Application – Razorfish Demo from Razorfish – Emerging Experiences on Vimeo . HSBC Premier in Hong Kong and YES Bank in India have given their customers RFID -enabled ATM and Debit cards, so that when you walk in the branch, they already know who you are and can start anticipating how best to serve you. YES Bank’s RFID readers are hidden behind brand signage We know Banco Santander has already deployed a very cool media wall in their corporate headquarters (along with Robot assistants), but I envisage that media walls will increasingly come into the branch to create both a super-dynamic advertising environment, along with a place for customers to interact in-branch. Jeffry Pilcher at Financial Brand has done a great piece on branch design and the use of interaction – The Future Of Branches . Check it out if you can… Conclusions The future of the branch is about engagement. The old thinking that was based on getting customers into a branch to do a transaction and cross-selling them is no longer a viable model, because the branch provides no value-add for a transaction. Thus, if the branch is about an excellent, high-quality face-to-face interaction, we need to build for that. Open up the branches, hire new staff and put new systems in place designed to support the conversation with the customer. The high-counter old teller stations and staff who are versed in transactional banking, won’t work in the BANK 2.0 world. See our work on engagement banking in more detail here…

Read the full article →

David Isenberg: Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell, Don’t Oversee, Don’t Account

September 26, 2010

When, on Sep. 21, Senate Democrats failed, due to Republican opposition, to get the required 60 votes needed to put a referendum on the military’s “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy to a vote they did more than fail to repeal the policy which prevents gays and lesbians from serving openly in the military. Both parties screwed up the chance to get more effective accountability and oversight on private military and security contractors. Included in the FY 2011 National Defense Authorization bill were two very relevant, to the PMSC industry, provisions. They were pilot program on best value for contracts for private security functions, and standards and certification for private security contractors These are no-brainer ideas that anyone with even the most cursory understanding of federal contracting should want to see adopted. The idea that when evaluating a contractor’s bid one should look at factors other than the bottom line financial cost is, as Sherlock Holmes said, elementary. Things like a contractor’s past record, reputation and experience are, of course, just a few of the other criterion one would examine. Anyone who has ever hired a contractor to work on their home understands this. Groups like the Commission on Wartime Contracting have also called for this And, anyone who has ever followed the news about private security contractors over the years understands that the need for independent certification that PSC adhere to proscribed standards is vital. To its credit, IPOA a Washington, DC-based U.S. trade association for private military and security contractors supported both measures. See here and here for detail. Below are the two sections that deserve to be passed. Hopefully when the Defense Authorization bill finally does get passed these measures will still be included. H.R.5136 National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Reported in House – RH) SEC. 323. PILOT PROGRAM ON BEST VALUE FOR CONTRACTS FOR PRIVATE SECURITY FUNCTIONS. (a) Pilot Program Authorized- Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall establish a pilot program under which the Secretary shall implement a best value procurement standard in entering into contracts for the provision of private security functions in Afghanistan and Iraq. In entering into a covered contract under the pilot program, in addition to taking into consideration the cost of the contract, the Secretary shall take into consideration each of the following: (1) Past performance. (2) Quality. (3) Delivery. (4) Management expertise. (5) Technical approach. (6) Experience of key personnel. (7) Management structure. (8) Risk. (9) Such other matters as the Secretary determines are appropriate. (b) Justification- A covered contract under the pilot program may not be awarded unless the contracting officer for the contract justifies in writing the reason for the award of the contract. (c) Annual Report- Not later than January 15 of each year the pilot program under this section is carried out, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees an unclassified report containing each of the following: (1) A list of any covered contract awarded for private security functions in Afghanistan and Iraq under the pilot program. (2) A description of the matters that the Secretary of Defense took into consideration, in addition to cost, in awarding each such contract. (3) Any additional information or recommendations the Secretary considers appropriate to include with respect to the pilot program, the contracts awarded under the pilot program, or the considerations for evaluating such contracts. (d) Termination of Program- The authority of the Secretary of Defense to carry out a pilot program under this section terminates on September 30, 2013. The termination of the authority shall not affect the validity of contracts that are awarded or modified during the period of the pilot program, without regard to whether the contracts are performed during the period. (e) Discretionary Implementation After September 30, 2013- After September 30, 2013, implementation of a best value procurement standard in entering into contracts for the provision of private security functions in Afghanistan and Iraq shall be at the discretion of the Secretary of Defense. (f) Definitions- In this section: (1) The term `best value’ means providing the best overall benefit to the Government in accordance with the tradeoff process described in section 15.101-1 of title 48 of the Code of Federal Regulations. (2) The term `covered contract’ means– (A) a contract of the Department of Defense for the performance of services; or (B) a task order or delivery order issued under such a contract. (3) The term `private security functions’ means guarding, by a contractor under a covered contract, of personnel, facilities, or property of a Federal agency, the contractor, a subcontractor of a contractor, or a third party. SEC. 324. STANDARDS AND CERTIFICATION FOR PRIVATE SECURITY CONTRACTORS. (a) Third-party Certification Policy Guidance- Not later than 270 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall issue policy guidance requiring, as a condition for award of a covered contract for the provision of private security functions, that each contractor receive certification from a third party that the contractor adheres to specified operational and business practice standards. The guidance shall– (1) establish criteria for defining standard practices for the performance of private security functions, which shall reflect input from industry representatives as well as the Inspector General of the Department of Defense; (2) establish criteria for weapons training programs for contractors performing private security functions, including minimum requirements for weapons training programs of instruction and minimum qualifications for instructors for such programs; and (3) identify organizations that can carry out the certifications. (b) Regulations Required- Not later than 270 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall revise the Department of Defense supplement to the Federal Acquisition Regulation to carry out the requirements of this section and the guidance issued under this section. (c) Definitions- In this section: (1) The term `covered contract’ means– (A) a contract of the Department of Defense for the performance of services; (B) a subcontract at any tier under such contract; (C) a task order or delivery order issued under such a contract or subcontract. (2) The term `contractor’ means, with respect to a covered contract, the contractor or subcontractor carrying out the covered contract. (3) The term `private security functions’ means activities engaged in by a contractor under a covered contract as follows: (A) Guarding of personnel, facilities, or property of a Federal agency, the contractor or subcontractor, or a third party. (B) Any other activity for which personnel are required to carry weapons in the performance of their duties. (d) Exception- The requirements of this section shall not apply to contracts entered into by elements of the intelligence community in support of intelligence activities.

Read the full article →

Short Sales Sweep The Nation: Troubled Homeowners Walk Away With Less

September 26, 2010

A new wave of distressed home sales is rippling, more quietly this time, through American cities and suburbs. Its unsettling effects are playing out here in Manassas, along Brewer Creek Place, a modest, horseshoe-shaped street lined with 98 brick townhouses. Several years after the U.S. foreclosure crisis erupted, the U-Hauls are back. The last time, banks seized nearly every fourth house on the street through foreclosure. This time, homeowners are going another route: a short sale.

Read the full article →

KKR to buy Visma for $1.88b

September 26, 2010

KKR to buy Visma for $1.88b

Read the full article →

Ericsson to buy Nortel unit for $65m

September 26, 2010

Ericsson to buy Nortel unit for $65m

Read the full article →

Eurus, NRG to build solar plant in California

September 26, 2010

Eurus, NRG to build solar plant in California

Read the full article →

PLX to buy Ternetics for $35m

September 26, 2010

PLX to buy Ternetics for $35m

Read the full article →

German business confidence on the rise

September 26, 2010

German business confidence on the rise

Read the full article →

Ford’s China JV to build $500m plant

September 26, 2010

Ford’s China JV to build $500m plant

Read the full article →

Canada’s budget deficit narrows to $462m

September 26, 2010

Canada’s budget deficit narrows to $462m

Read the full article →

Hyundai to recall Sonata sedans in US

September 26, 2010

Hyundai to recall Sonata sedans in US

Read the full article →

Tevez fires Man City to win

September 26, 2010

Tevez fires Man City to win

Read the full article →

Iran to stop cyber worm attack

September 26, 2010

Iran to stop cyber worm attack

Read the full article →

Brazilian govt raises stake in Petrobras

September 26, 2010

Brazilian govt raises stake in Petrobras

Read the full article →

Plan to set up $701m polyethylene plant in Pakistan

September 26, 2010

Plan to set up $701m polyethylene plant in Pakistan

Read the full article →

Oil scene: A time bomb called energy poverty

September 26, 2010

Oil scene: A time bomb called energy poverty

Read the full article →

Russian investment outflow reaches $12b

September 26, 2010

Russian investment outflow reaches $12b

Read the full article →

Thailand’s economy boosted by exports increase

September 26, 2010

25 Sep 2010 According to a statement of Thailand economy, which is showing that the trade surplus has widened during the month of August, as the nation’s exports increased for the 10th straight mont…

Read the full article →

Citi Boosts Executive Pay

September 26, 2010

NEW YORK — Citigroup, still partly owned by the government after a rescue during the financial meltdown, is giving raises to top executives that could amount to millions of dollars. CEO Vikram Pandit, who is drawing a salary of $1 for the second year in a row, did not get a raise, but the chairman of the bank hinted it plans a big payout for him next year. The announcement Friday by Citi, which remains weaker than most of the large American banks two years after the meltdown, raised questions among experts on corporate governance. By paying the raises in company stock, not cash, Citi has decided to follow previously issued guidelines that limited salaries to $500,000 for the top 25 executives at financial institutions still receiving large amounts of federal help. “The question is do they deserve higher salaries, and are they evading rules to avoid losing talent?” asked Charles Elson, director of the Weinberg Center for corporate governance at the University of Delaware. Citi is fighting to keep talented bankers from jumping ship to any of its rivals on Wall Street, all of whom have repaid their federal bailout money and are not under the same kind of compensation restrictions. Edward Skyler, a spokesman for the bank, said the compensation levels “correspond with similarly situated executives in the industry.” Citi was the hardest-hit U.S. bank during the credit crisis of 2008, and received $45 billion in government bailout money under the Troubled Asset Relief Program, part of which was converted to stock last year. The government is gradually selling its stake and still owns about 17 percent of the bank. Though Citi has posted profits recently, Citi continues to be weighed down by large amounts of bad loans and investments it made in the run-up to the crisis. Pandit, who pledged last year to take a $1 salary until the bank returned to profitability, elected to keep that figure for this year, but he seems set for a big payday in 2011. Citi’s chairman, Richard Parsons, said in a statement that beginning next year the bank’s board “intends to compensate Vikram commensurate with the job of CEO of Citi.” Rolfe Kopelan, a managing partner at search firm Capstone Partnership and an expert on corporate compensation, said $1 still seems appropriate for Pandit. “It’s not ridiculous when you’re living on public funds, and when you’re one of the major causes of the recession,” Kopelan said. The biggest raise disclosed in Citi’s regulatory filing will go to John Havens, head of the bank’s institutional clients group. He will get a cash salary of $500,000 this year, the maximum under the cap, and $9 million of salary paid in stock. That compares with a salary of $975,000 last year for Havens, also in a blend of cash and stock. Including other awards of stock and options last year, Havens’ total compensation last year came to $11.2 million. Citibank did not disclose how much Havens might be awarded in other stock grants, but he could be eligible for a bonus this year of up to 50 percent of his salary, or $4.75 million. Manuel Medina-Mora, head of consumer banking for the Americas, will also get a cash salary of $500,000 and $7.45 million of salary in stock, making him eligible for a bonus of up to $4 million. Last year, Medina-Mora’s base salary was $972,000, and his total compensation including other awards of stock and options was $9.8 million. Chief Financial Officer John Gerspach’s salary will be $500,000 in cash and $4.17 million in stock, making him eligible for a bonus of up to $2.3 million. Last year, his cash and stock salary was $3.3 million, and his total compensation including other stock awards was $5 million. Under an amendment to the bank bailout law of 2008, Citi is still subject to the compensation restrictions as long as the government remains a shareholder. That means the top 25 executives cannot receive bonuses exceeding 50 percent of their salaries. In deciding to give their salary raises in stock, Citi chose to abide by a previous rule that governed the bailout, under which top executives could not receive more than $500,000 of their salary in cash. The Associated Press’ calculation for executive pay aims to isolate the value the company’s board placed on the CEO’s total compensation package. The figure includes salary, bonus, incentives, perks and the estimated value of stock options and awards. The calculations don’t include changes in the present value of pension benefits, and they sometimes differ from the totals companies list with federal regulators. ___ AP Business Writer Matthew Craft contributed to this report.

Read the full article →

GMAC Pulls Foreclosure Affidavits Signed By Kristine Wilson

September 26, 2010

Attorneys for homeowners in Florida say Ally Financial’s GMAC mortgage unit has begun to withdraw affidavits submitted in support of foreclosures that were signed by a second employee.

Read the full article →

GMAC Foreclosures Investigated By State Attorneys General

September 26, 2010

Attorneys general in three U.S. states are investigating foreclosures at Ally Financial Inc.’s GMAC Mortgage unit after the lender said it would halt some evictions following a discovery of faulty documentation.

Read the full article →

Danny Schechter: After Larry Summers, What? Will We Continue to Go Down Hill?

September 26, 2010

Summers Packs His Bags As The Recession is Said To Be Over And Media Buries Reports on Financial Crime As the November election approaches, the White House seems to be ending its Rip Van Winkle-like slumber and has begun crawling out of the bubble of its own making. Many fear it’s a bit late. The shakeup of President Obama’s economic team is long overdue. As Larry Summers slithers back to Harvard to save his tenure and write his book, he is likely to be replaced by exactly the wrong kind of person — a business executive, appointed to try to appease the Repugs and the Right. (Summers was paid $586,996-a-year at Hahvard and picks up all kinds of consulting deals on the side from Wall Street.) This maneuver won’t work of course because nothing Obama does will ever please them because they need him as their piñata, and a symbol of failure. He claims to see that but just can’t seem to get his appeasement gene in check. Notes the Naked Capitalism blog, “As much as some will be pleased to see Larry gone (he was a leading advocate of bank-friendly policies), his replacement is certain not to represent a change in philosophy… he has made the cardinal mistake of trying to please everyone and has succeeded in having no one happy with his policies.” Journalist Robert Scheer hopes “Summers will have time to reflect on the dismal arc of his split tenure in government service. Thanks to the banking debacle he did so much to initiate back in the Clinton years, the nation now has more people living in poverty, 43.6 million of them, than ever in our history. Americans have witnessed the disappearance of $11 trillion of their net worth, $1.5 trillion in the second quarter; the debt has risen alarmingly; unemployment is stuck at 9.6 percent; and trillions of dollars in toxic pools of housing stock are still held by the banks to be thrown into the housing market fire sale anytime home prices promise to edge upward. Behold what brilliance has wrought.” Financial journalist Michael M. Thomas believes that Summers like a gunslinger hired to clean up a town did what he was hired to do arguing, “Summers is leaving because he made sure real reform was discussed–but not accomplished.” “Larry Summers was tasked with making sure the kind of backlash that in 1933 unleashed Ferdinand Pecora on Wall Street didn’t happen in 2009. I think Larry Summers was tasked with marginalizing Paul Volcker, who could thus serve the new administration as moral window-dressing without actually causing trouble. I think it was understood from the outset that any meaningful economics program must involve taking Wall Street to the woodshed, and that this must not be allowed to happen.” Bob Woodward’s book on Obama focuses on an internal war over policy for the Afghan war. That may be mild compared to the revelations to come on the debates over what to do about the economy. (Woodward offers one telling detail about Obama’s approach describing how he laid out his plan in the form of a financial terms sheet used on Wall Street.) To “balance” his appointment of Elizabeth Warren, the President has nominated Jack Lews to head the Office of Management and Budget. Bernie Sanders says he will not support him because “I found too many echoes of the failed policies of the past in his responses to my questions on trade policy, Social Security, deregulation of banks and other issues.” Even as the rats jump ship. The National Bureau of Economic Research which took a year to admit that the country was in recession now says the Recession is over, a conclusion that is not widely shared especially because the structural, systemic and political problems that caused the crisis have not been remedied. The respected Chilean Economist Manfred Max-Neef says the US economy is “underdeveloping.” Others still fear a total collapse. But now that recovery has been pronounced — even if there has been no job creation — the media has a good excuse to move off the subject, to assume the best, and avoid investigating how the crisis happened, who benefited and who lost and is still losing, The issues I have been raising about the crimes of Wall Street have been brushed under the rug, even by filmmaker Oliver Stone from whom one might have expected a deeper critique in his new Wall Street Film, Money Never Sleeps . The Village Voice , who you would expect would welcome it, says Stone lets the “bad Guys off the hook?’ “If barely prosecuted, the real players in our last crash face a long pop-culture pillorying. That is not, however, how Stone works; regarding power, his conclusions are best summed up by the hippie chick at the Lincoln Memorial in Nixon: “You can’t stop it, can you? Even if you wanted to. It’s not you. It’s the system.” Floating off on a faux-naïve happy ending this time, one takes the lesson that there are no villains–or that villains are all there are.” So a generic indictment of “the system” substitutes for any exploration of the way that system actually worked, not just to make greed good but to hurt millions of people worldwide who lost jobs, homes and hope, plunging millions worldwide and here at home into deepening poverty. I personally gave Stone a copy of my investigative film Plunder The Crime of our Time months ago, but he seems to have brushed it off focusing instead on a miasma of slick Hollywood production values. (Disclosure: I made a documentary, Beyond JFK , for Oliver’s company and he was in it, that was back in 1992.) I have been getting some visibility for my DVD and companion book The Crime of our Time but not in mainstream media. Earlier this week, at a book launch, A Tea Party activist showed up for my spiel and took me to task loudly for being dismissive of her movement. But after we talked, I was pleased that she became open to my concerns and even, get this praised me as “fair and balanced.” I was surprised. You can hear some of our exchanges and a storm of debate on Between The Lines radio that I was also broadcasting over during my talk. The Tea Party people, by and large, don’t seem very angry with Wall Street. And as for the Republicans, Huff Post reports, “The Republican Party’s 21-page blueprint, “Pledge to America,” was put together with oversight by a House staffer who, up till April 2010, served as a lobbyist for some of the nation’s most powerful oil, pharmaceutical, and insurance companies, including AIG.” Short of a major deepening of the crisis in the next few weeks, the election will soon constitute all the news all the time. While voters are said to be angriest about the economy and Obama’s failures to stem the tide, the media will not devote much time or energy to educating the public about the deeper issues. Not when so many pundits and election insiders are fighting for face time on TV. Political blather and polls are back. Economic crime is downplayed. Unfortunately, one of the most important stories of our time is about to be buried again. News Dissector Danny Schechter made Plunder The Crime Or Our Time and wrote the companion book The Crime of our Time . See Plunderthecrimeofourtime.com . Comments to dissector@mediachannel.org.

Read the full article →

Stimulus Act Job Funding Set To Expire, Tens Of Thousands Facing Unemployment

September 25, 2010

Tens of thousands of people will lose their jobs within weeks unless Congress extends one of the more effective job-creating programs in the $787 billion stimulus act: a $1 billion New Deal-style program that directly paid the salaries of unemployed people

Read the full article →

Waylon Lewis: Whole Foods Dumps Silk Soy (VIDEO)

September 25, 2010

Whole Foods will no longer carry Dean Foods’ Silk Soy milk–instead goes with organic brands. Last year, Silk Soy–while continuing to offer a somewhat higher-priced organic option– pushed the majority of its soy milk to “natural” (the beans still weren’t genetically modified [GMO], which is great). It was a blow to the green movement–and one that changed Silk, overnight, from the world’s largest organic brand into, well, not. Recently, I interviewed my friends at the Dean Foods-owned White Wave/Silk Soy about their decision to go “natural.” To their credit, they were open about the up- and downsides. See the second half of the below video of elephant editor Waylon Lewis’ adventure at the recent Natural Products Expo West in LA, here: Whole Foods dumps Silk Soy. Silk, started by one of Boulder, Colorado’s natural products titans, Steve Demos , and now owned and controlled by mega-corp Dean Foods, was just dealt what must come as a pretty big blow–they’ve been cleaved from their strongest customer base–the conscious consumers who built Silk, back when it was owned by Mr. Demos, into a major player and first real alternative to milk. For more, click here or here or here or here . Or here . Excerpt via Planet Green : The Cornucopia Institute claimed victory against the largest soymilk producer in the country this week, after a landmark deal with Whole Foods: “Saying that its relationship with Dean Foods had ‘chilled,’ Whole Foods indicated it was bringing in a new branded organic soymilk partner, Earth Balance…’Dean Foods has been roundly criticized for taking the organic out of Silk, and now the marketplace and consumers are passing their judgment,’ said Mark Kastel, Cornucopia’s senior farm policy analyst. ‘They took what once was a pioneering 100% organic brand, before they acquired the company in 2003, and cheapened the product at the expense of American farmers and consumers. Now they are paying a price for their naked profiteering,’ Kastel added.” In addition, Whole Foods wants Earth Balance’s soymilk products to be made strictly from soybeans grown in the U.S. That stipulation likely comes as a direct response to Silk’s initial shift–even before it gave up on organic–away from domestic soybeans when it started sourcing (organic, at first) from China. …for the rest, click here. Excerpt via elephriend Alica Wallace of Boulder Daily Camera: Move comes in wake of WhiteWave shifting Silk away from certified organic soybeans Fourteen years ago, a burgeoning Boulder company — WhiteWave Inc. — was responsible for launching Silk soymilk, a brand that is now the category leader. So when Whole Foods Market wanted to boost its organic soymilk options a year after Dean Foods’ WhiteWave Foods shifted most of its Silk products away from certified organic soybeans, the Austin, Texas, grocer turned to a burgeoning Boulder County firm — one stocked with former White Wave employees. Whole Foods this week announced an agreement with Longmont-based Earth Balance under which the natural foods division of New Jersey-based spreads company Smart Balance Inc. would launch its line of organic soymilks at Whole Foods stores nationwide… for the rest, click here. I’ll leave you with a remarkable, though tangential factoid: “The NY Times reports that Silk spent $29.1 million on advertising in major media last year.” Whew!

Read the full article →

The 14th Banker: Misdiagnosis of Small Business Act

September 25, 2010

The AP did a reductionist story on the Small Business Legislation just passed by the Congress. This has circulated widely and the I will reference a version included in a post by Mish Shedlock , who I follow and generally find informative. On this one he has missed the boat. The Act does have something meaningful to offer, but only to bold and creative financiers and their clients. There is a refrain taken up by bankers immediately in the wake of the financial crash of 2007-2008. The refrain is this, “It is not our fault that small business lending plunged, there was no loan demand.” That refrain is basically repeated in Mish’s piece. Only now, we are two years later and in fact there is reduced loan demand. But contrary to his point, that does not make such a program irrelevant and wasteful, it makes it all the more necessary. You tell me, does this look like insightful economic analysis or political reactivity? When government passes out the money normally people are lined up, in advance, with both hands out. When that does not happen, it’s because the offer smells like a rotten fish. Please check out Obama’s latest rotten fish offering as described in  Small businesses, community bankers may snub Obama’s $30 billion loan program . So here we have the tone of the piece. Note the comment, “latest rotten fish offering”. I guess this follows on many previous rotten fish offerings. From the AP: President Barack Obama’s $30 billion small community business lending program faces one big challenge: many of the community banks and businesses it’s supposed to help don’t want it. The lending program is part of a bill that passed the House of Representatives on Thursday and now awaits the president’s signature. The legislation contains a mix of tax cuts and credits aimed at helping small businesses. The centerpiece of the bill is an effort to make billions of dollars available to community banks for loans to small businesses. Bank executives say their customers don’t want loans, even at low interest rates, because the sluggish economy has chilled expansion plans. Yes, the sluggish economy has chilled expansion plans. For historical context, we should be aware the the sluggish economy is the result of mal-investment by our largest financial institutions, hedge funds, private equity, pension funds, government sponsored enterprises, and individuals. Everyone wanted a quick profit. Banks chose to change their product mix to feed assets into securitized pools from which derivatives, CDOs, CDSs, etc could be created. Generally, this meant pushing standardized consumer loan products. The focus of credit activity shifted massively towards centrally underwritten, scored, mathematically modeled mortgages, home equity loans, and credit card products. These could be made sufficiently uniform to lump them together and sell off the risk to suckers at a quick profit. Customized personal credit and small business lending were de-emphasized. Why? they just did not generate the quick profit and the risk could not be offloaded to an investor or government sponsored enterprise. The result? Massive over-investment in residential real estate and debt fueled personal consumption. And, massive under-investment in the productive capacity of our industries. The busting of the bubble then had the follow on effect of putting most of our financial institutions on the brink of insolvency. The largest banks were saved by the bailout. Some will deny that they were saved by the bailout, saying they did not need the TARP. But the truth is, without the bailout all their counter-parties, including AIG and many foreign banks, would have wiped out even the strongest of our domestic financial institutions. Everyone was bailed out. Today however, despite what you will read below, many banks are constrained for capital and must limit lending and reduce their overall risk weighted assets. Do not let political posturing or propaganda fool you.  Recent unofficial problem bank lists indicate that there are well over 800 problem banks in this country. These banks cannot freely lend. Many other banks are suffering the same conditions even if they have not moved to the point of being “problem banks”. Lending is constrained. I have seen it in the market. The AP characterizes the situation as unproblematic, relying on the testimony of one banker. (there are others, but the AP article does no serious analysis) Bank executives say their customers don’t want loans, even at low interest rates, because the sluggish economy has chilled expansion plans. Some say the federal money isn’t worth it because they fear it will come with too much regulatory oversight. “We have taken a strategic decision not to have our primary regulator, the government, also be a partner in our bank,” said William Chase Jr., CEO of Triumph Bank in Memphis. Chase said the bank already has enough capital to meet the paltry demand for loans. “Our business customers are mired in uncertainty and are reluctant to invest in their businesses,” Chase said. This particular banker’s politics are also easily discerned. He does not want government money. Perhaps his little bank does not need it or does not have the creativity to know what to do with it. The crux of the lending program is this. The balance sheets of banks will be improved by increasing their capital positions with government purchases of preferred stock in banks with under $10 Billion in assets. Depending on their size, the banks can obtain this capital in amounts up to 5% of their assets. That is a huge amount of capital. In some cases it could increase capital ratios by up to 70% and fully support both the increase in loan portfolios and risk. The ask in return is moderate. The cost of capital is 5% at the baseline and can drop to as little as 1% if a bank increases its business loans by 10% or more from today’s lows. That is not hard for a bank with the ability to take on risk and a plan to do so. It is hard for a bank with no plan. But why would we want such to participate anyway? The loans may be used for these purposes: (15) SMALL BUSINESS LENDING. (A)   IN GENERAL The term ”small business lending” means small business lending, as defined by and reported in an eligible institution’s quarterly call report, of the following types: (i)   Commercial and industrial loans (ii)  Owner-occupied nonfarm, nonresidential real estate loans (iii) Loans to finance agricultural production and other loans to farmers. (iv) Loans secured by farmland. So these loans are for job creating activity and agriculture. A bank with a plan could seek to develop expertise in businesses related to clean efficient energy. No, a small bank cannot do massive wind farms. But they can support the myriad of small businesses, engineering firms, etc that support clean energy production. Or they could support the new technologies that provide for energy conservation. What would be required is actual expertise, not the mechanized mass-production, judgment free methods that have come to pervade the industry. A bank could also support the development of more healthy local fresh food production and the logistical apparatus to bring it to market. This would serve multi purposes of job creation, improving diet and health, reducing health care expenditures, and increasing quality of life. Such is the role finance used to play. There may not be massive demand for small business loans now. But should we be ready when the demand comes back? We cannot depend solely on the community banks that remain robust. We cannot depend on the mega-banks with their mechanized processes and lack of local knowledge or support for the subjective analytical processes that allow innovation. We cannot depend on bubble money providers from hedge funds and custodians for the uber rich. So we should have a program to support the development of more capacity for financial innovators in the banking sector, those that can develop a plan, build the expertise, act with purpose and integrity to do what is necessary to support our communities and the job and income growth that is necessary for a return to economic security. To quote Amar Bhidé: “The measure of a financial system ought to be the service it provides the economy as a whole, not the employment or bounties it bestows upon financiers.” So do not be discouraged by the words of Mish and others like him, works like these: So what does Congress do? Why it sets up a convoluted $30 billion program, onerous on small banks, so those small banks (who don’t want the money) can offer loans to small businesses that do not want the money either! That is simply defeatism and is neither forward looking or backwards aware. This is a nice simple program that will provide benefits if even 5% of financial institutions choose to participate. But do you know what? When they figure out how easy it is, plenty of financial institutions will draw this capital down and then employ it in ways that help get us out of this economic funk.

Read the full article →

Dan Dorfman: Abracadabra on Wall Street

September 25, 2010

Here we go, a dazzling display of Wall Street wizardry. Or more to the point, an amazing run of super up-and-down market calls from an amateur magician who could probably give Merlin a run for his money. That’s what I’ve seen from 70-year-old San Francisco money manager Gary Wollin, who runs about $105 million of assets under the banner, Gary Wollin & Co., and performs in magic circles under the name, The Great Baldini. When he’s on stage or giving investment speeches, Wollin, bald, bearded and easily passable for Santa Claus, generally opens his bag of tricks by turning a regular dollar bill into a giant-sized dollar bill. And that’s essentially his expectation for the stock market, as well, a considerably larger valuation for the Dow, which sees climbing from its current 10,860, to about 12,000 by year end. A relative unknown as money managers go, our magician has also displayed considerable razzle-dazzle in the marketplace in recent years with an awesome exhibition of uncanny market timing. That is, calling a series of significant up and down movements in equity prices. Here’s his documented record. In November 2007 with the Dow about 13,300, Wollin recommended that stocks be sold. It was wonderful market timing as the Dow subsequently crashed, plummeting to around 6,500 by March 18, 2009. At that point, he reversed course and said it was time to buy stocks again. One again, it was wonderful timing as the Dow climbed to 10,400 by February 18, 2010. At 10,400, he turned cautious, saying it was time to take a snooze. Indeed, sleep proved to be the right prescription for investors as the Dow slid to 10,120 by July, 21. Given his array of remarkable market calls, it’s no wonder that The Great Baldini’s forecasts have appeared a number of times in my writings. No one, though, can be Superman all the time, and Wollin showed it in mid-July by reiterating his snooze strategy. That was a goof since the Dow subsequently rose 740 points or about 7%. “I didn’t lose any sleep over missing that move,” says Wollin, “because I’m a long-term investor. The name of the game here is patience and no one is right 100% of the time.” As a money manager, Wollin, whose investment thrust centers on big name blue chips, is no slouch. Over the last 30 years, he tells me, he figures he”s outperformed the Dow by an average 2% a year. So far this year, he’s up 5.1%, slightly above the Dow’s rise of 4.1%. Why so gung-ho on the market with all the worrisome economic concerns out there? Wollin points to the following: The economy has stepped back from the edge of the cliff, is picking up steam and the National Bureau of Economic Research has declared the recession is over (which, by the way, a number of market pros strongly dispute). It looks like the European debt crisis has passed and investors are recognizing it. The Federal Reserve, fearful of killing the recovery, will continue to keep interest rates very low. There is enormous liquidity on the sidelines, notably the trillions of dollars sitting in money-market funds, bond funds and CDs. Vacation is over and the pros (mutual fund and hedge fund managers) have to start buying because anything they have in cash investments is earning practically zero percent. John Q. Public is also saddled with puny yields, as seen by money-market returns of 0.45% for two-year Treasuries, 2.6% for 10-year Treasuries, 0.06% for money-market funds, as measured by the Fidelity Cash Reserves Fund, and around 1.22% for CDs. Given, as well, a strengthening market, as seen in Friday’s nearly 198-point rise in the Dow, reflecting a positive economic report. Wollin expects a decided pickup soon in trading volume, a lot more corporate stock buybacks and an increasing number of companies issuing debt to buy back stock. In conjunction with this scenario, he expects more good economic news, namely top-line sales increases, higher earnings, little by little more job creations and a bottoming out of the housing market by the second quarter of 2011. To Wollin, it all means the public should soon be returning to the stock market. “Greed should come back in fashion big time as fear and uncertainty begin to evaporate,” he says. His 10 favorite stocks, all of which he views as market outperformers over the next 12 months, are IBM, Procter & Gamble, Triple M, Johnson & Johnson, Chevron, AT&T, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Federal Express, UPS and CSX Corp. One final question: How did Wollin come up with the name, The Great Baldini. “My girl friend and I had just finished making love,” he explained. “I’m bald, she said the sex was great, and from now on I’m going to call you The Great Baldini. And that was it.” It’s not every day I chat with a master in magic, the market and love-making. This was one of those days. What do you think? E-mail me at Dandordan@aol.com.

Read the full article →

U.S. Bails Out Major Credit Unions

September 25, 2010

WASHINGTON — Federal regulators took over three key lenders to U.S. credit unions, after losses on mortgage investments threatened to topple them. The move was a reminder that parts of the financial system are still burdened by the toxic assets two years after the financial crisis peaked. The National Credit Union Administration voted Friday to place into conservatorship three corporate credit unions: Members United Corporate Federal Credit Union of Warrenville, Ill; Southwest Corporate Federal Credit Union of Plano, Texas; and Constitution Corporate Federal Credit Union of Wallingford, Conn. Conservatorship allows the government to run financial companies while keeping them open. The government will replace the companies’ executives and boards. The companies will be shuttered, and their parts sold off to recoup losses. Corporate credit unions provide wholesale financing and investment services for the more than 7,000 U.S. credit unions. They do not offer retail services to consumers. Most retail credit unions remain healthy, and will continue operating as normal. Corporate credit unions made big bets on commercial and residential mortgage investments before the housing market collapsed. The bonds lost much of their value, leaving corporate credit unions with too little cash to cover unexpected losses. Regulators decided they could not be saved. The government will repackage $50 billion worth of toxic bonds from the companies it seized. New investments worth about $35 billion will be sold to private buyers. The government will guarantee them against losses. Officials said the plan will not cost taxpayers any money. The losses will be repaid with fees collected from credit unions, they said. The NCUA has borrowed billions from the Treasury to stabilize corporate credit unions. Treasury agreed to extend that loan through June 30, 2021, the NCUA said. That gives retail credit unions more time to spread out the cost of repaying. The NCUA has taken over five of the largest wholesale credit unions since March 2009. They account for 70 percent of the total assets of corporate credit unions, and 98 percent of the assets that lost value. The two largest companies were taken over last year. The three seized Friday also suffered big losses during the global credit collapse. Officials said they were kept open because of their importance to retail credit unions. “They weren’t just out there operating,” said Deborah Matz, chairman of the NCUA. “We were working very, very closely with their management to monitor their activities.”

Read the full article →

Bush Tax Cuts Reduced Total Income By $2.7 Trillion

September 25, 2010

Just as they did in 2000, the Republicans are running this year on an economic platform of tax cuts, especially making the tax cuts permanent for the richest among us. So how did the tax cuts work out? My analysis of the new data, with all figures in 2008 dollars: Total income was $2.74 trillion less during the eight Bush years than if incomes had stayed at 2000 levels.

Read the full article →

Ukraine signs coal deal with China

September 25, 2010

Ukraine signs coal deal with China

Read the full article →

US new home sales flat in August

September 25, 2010

US new home sales flat in August

Read the full article →