October 2010

Industry Veteran Ed Rogas Joins FormFactor Board of Directors

October 26, 2010

LIVERMORE, CA–(Marketwire – October 26, 2010) –  FormFactor, Inc. ( NASDAQ : FORM ) today announced the appointment of Edward Rogas, Jr. as a member of the company’s Board of Directors. Mr. Rogas’ considerable experience in the semiconductor equipment industry further strengthens the board’s technology and industry expertise. Mr. Rogas held management positions at Teradyne, Inc. for over 30 years, including serving as Sr. Vice President from 2000 through 2005. He currently serves on the Boards of Vitesse Semiconductor Corporation and Vignani Technologies Pvt Ltd. 

Read the full article →

Richard Barrington: The 10 Best States for Retirement (PHOTOS)

October 26, 2010

“Best of” lists are usually based on subjective points. When choosing our 10 best and worst states to retire, we went with the objective. Earlier this week, MoneyRates.com published a list of the 10 worst states for retirement . This list was based on a combination of quantifiable factors including: Economics (factoring in cost of living, unemployment, and average state and local tax burden) Climate Crime rate Life expectancy Now, the good news. MoneyRates.com has compiled a list of the 10 best states for retirement. You’ll find the MoneyRates.com list is not all geared to one set of priorities — it isn’t, for example, a list of 10 warm-weather states — but instead should have something for everybody. Some of the choices might surprise you, but when you look over the criteria, you can decide which states have the most appealing characteristics for your tastes. Then join the discussion on the best and worst states for retirement on the MoneyRates.com blog. The original article can be found at MoneyRates.com: 10 Best States for Retirement PHOTOS: Data sources: ACCRA Cost of Living Index, the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the Tax Foundation, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, MSNBC, the U.S. Census Bureau, Bloomberg Businessweek

Read the full article →

Video: TD Bank’s Clark Seeks Acquisition With `Right Culture’

October 26, 2010

Oct. 26 (Bloomberg) — Edmund Clark, chief executive officer of Toronto-Dominion Bank, talks with Bloomberg’s Melissa Long about the outlook for his company. Clark, speaking from the Economist magazine’s Buttonwood Gathering in New York, also discusses the prospects for the U.S. economy. (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

VHA Hires David J. Robertson to Lead Regional Hospital Network

October 26, 2010

IRVING, TX–(Marketwire – October 26, 2010) –  VHA Inc., the national health care network, has hired David J. Robertson as senior vice president and executive officer over its Oklahoma and Arkansas region. The VHA Oklahoma/Arkansas office coordinates and directs VHA efforts to serve 43 member hospitals and hundreds of non-acute care organizations in the two states. 

Read the full article →

Trycera Financial Appoints Two Key Executives

October 26, 2010

IRVINE, CA–(Marketwire – October 26, 2010) –  Trycera Financial, Inc. ( OTCBB : TRYF ), a diversified financial services company, today announced that it has appointed two key members to its executive leadership team.

Read the full article →

Robert D. Atkinson, Ph.D.: Ending Innovation Mercantilism

October 26, 2010

The following is a guest post written by Stephen Ezell, Senior Analyst, Information Technology and Innovation Foundation As it’s becoming clearer every day that innovation is the central driver of economic growth, more and more countries are trying to be innovation leaders. Unfortunately, in that quest all too many countries are choosing to go down a path of “innovation mercantilism” by implementing beggar-thy-neighbor strategies designed to gain advantage at the expense of other nations and overall global innovation progress. These nations see the royal road to prosperity as through expanded technology exports and the best way to do that they believe is through gaming the international trading system through a number of mercantilist practices, including by manipulating their currencies, distorting technology standards, providing export subsidies, forcing technology transfer as a condition of market access, pirating intellectual property, and favoring indigenous over foreign technology products and services in government procurement. While China is perhaps the most egregious example of a country practicing innovation mercantilism, it is by no means the only one, as similar (if not as prevalent) practices can be found in Brazil, Argentina, India, Japan, Russia, Singapore, South Korea, and a host of other, even European Union, nations. As these countries bend and break the rules, play zero-sum games, and think only about short-term gains for themselves at the expense of the rest of the world, they undermine and destabilize the international economy and risk killing the innovation goose that would lay the golden egg for them and for the rest of the world. In a just-released report, The Good, The Bad, The Ugly, and The Self-Destructive of Innovation Policy , the Information Technology and Innovation Foundation (ITIF), provides a comprehensive catalog of countries’ innovation policies toward skills and immigration, trade, tax, scientific research, intellectual property, government procurement, standards, and regulations. The report assesses whether countries are implementing innovation policies in ways that are either: 1) “Good,” benefiting the country and the world simultaneously; 2) “Bad,” failing to benefit either the country or the world; 3) “Ugly,” benefiting the country at the expense of other nations; or 4) “Self-destructive,” actually hurting the country while benefiting others. It finds that, unfortunately, the Good policies tend to be outnumbered by the Bad, Ugly, and Self-destructive ones. Many of the fastest growing innovation policies are of the Ugly variety; benefiting the country, at least in the short run, but hurting the rest of the world. Mercantilist practices can indeed be effective–there is no doubt about that. China’s “Ugly” practices such as currency manipulation, pilfering intellectual property, and forcing technology transfer as a condition of market access have in fact boosted the country’s exports, moved productive activity to its shores, and hurt foreign producers (and in many cases knocked them out of business entirely). From 2006 to 2010, China’s share of world exports jumped from 7 to 10 percent and the country ran up a $826 billion trade surplus in the years 2007 and 2008 alone. But many of the policies that nations think are beneficial to them are actually Bad. That is, the policies hurt not only the rest of the global economy, but also the economy of the nation implementing it. An example is mercantilist countries’ practice of manipulating their currencies to artificially lower them in an attempt to help their exporters. But doing so raises the price of capital goods, especially for information and communications technology (ICT) products, inhibiting the diffusion of ICTs throughout all other sectors of their economy, making those sectors less competitive, and causing overall economic productivity to stagnate. As another example of a Bad innovation policy, for every $1 of tariffs India imposed on imported ICT products (as part of its efforts to spur an indigenous computer industry), the country suffered a net economic loss of $1.30. Why then do so many nations pursue Ugly, Bad, or even Self-destructive innovation policies? Most of them–and the apologists who defend them–have convinced themselves that they need to do this to succeed economically. They are wrong. They believe that “exports are needed to create jobs.” In fact, exports don’t create jobs, at least in the moderate to long-term. These nations could achieve full employment just as readily by implementing a loose monetary policy, aggressive fiscal policy, and an effective social safety net. They don’t need trade surpluses to employ all their workers. They also claim that innovation mercantilism helps them move up the value chain and get richer. But in reality, the much surer way to get rich is through raising the productivity levels of all industries, not just export-oriented ones, particularly by applying innovation and leveraging information technology. Just look at Japan. It certainly boasts world-leading manufacturers in automobiles, consumer electronics, and ICT products, but the non-traded sectors of its economy, such as retail, have only a fraction of the productivity of Western ones, it trails badly in the usage of ICTs, and it conspicuously lacks any world-class service firms. Consequently, the overall productivity of Japan’s economy is 70 percent of America’s. As a recent New York Times article made clear, as Japan has reached the dead-end of a predominantly export-led growth strategy, it has fallen into economic malaise. Finally, many of these policies impoverish, not enrich, their citizens. For example, If China didn’t run its $428 billion trade surplus and instead imported real goods and services instead of Treasury bills, Chinese households would on average see a 17 percent increase in their disposable income. While many nations have bought into the wrong economic theory, it wouldn’t be as serious a problem as it is if their misguided policies didn’t also hurt other nations individually and global innovation rates overall. For example, when a country steals intellectual property, instead of itself expanding R&D funding, it lowers global knowledge stocks. Likewise, when one country manipulates its currency, others feel forced to follow suit to stay competitive. Thus, the global trading system devolves into a competition where every country is incented to cheat and so the overall global economy suffers. Other countries’ mercantilist policies not only move innovation-based jobs away from the United States, which is bad for us, but also undermine globalization, which is bad for all. As such, we need a system of globalization that moves nations away from Bad, Ugly, and Self-destructive polices toward Good ones, such as improved education systems, an openness to high-skill immigration, increased R&D funding, effective science and technology policies, policies to spur widespread digital transformation of their economies, etc. Good innovation policies benefit the entire world, because innovations in one place ultimately spillover to the benefit of citizens worldwide. Think of a new pharmaceutical developed in South Korea or France that benefits all peoples, or when nations adopt new techniques in teaching and training. To be sure, when other nations implement Good, effective innovation policies, it means the U.S. will have to compete even harder to be successful in the global race for innovation advantage. So when France trumps the United States by offering an R&D tax credit six times more generous, or Denmark creates innovation vouchers for small businesses, or the Netherlands and Switzerland offer tax exempt status for profits generated from a newly patented product, this is all tough, fair competition. Ideally, countries’ constructive innovation policies spur other countries to emulate or improve on them, and all countries win. How can we end innovation mercantilism and develop a better approach to globalization? We need to start with a recognition that the current approach to globalization is not working. The new approach should be grounded in the perspective that markets drive global trade; that countries adhere to their trade agreements; that genuine, value-added innovation across all sectors drives economic growth; and that fair competition between nations to develop the best innovation policies is good for the world. At the coming mid-November G-20 summit, President Obama needs to insist that putting an end to countries’ rampant innovation mercantilism and developing a more sustainable vision for globalization top the agenda. The G-20 should demand that the World Bank and other multinational development agencies reformulate their strategies with a focus on supporting only countries that mostly practice Good innovation policies, and withdraw support from those whose predominant strategy is based on Ugly and Bad ones. The WTO needs to finally recognize and combat that what has been transpiring in the global trading system is not occasional and random infractions of certain trade provisions by countries that should be handled on a case-by-case basis, but rather that some countries continue to systematically violate the core tenets of the WTO because their dominant logic toward trade is predicated on export-led growth through mercantilist practices. The only way to stop countries’ systematic manipulation to gain competitive advantage by beggaring their neighbors is if the nations which engage in it less than others–principally the U.S., the Commonwealth nations, and most European countries–alongside with international organizations including the World Bank, WTO, and the International Monetary Fund agree to cooperate to fight it. The status quo is no longer sustainable. We should use the institutions and rules we have at our disposal with more gusto and nip innovation mercantilism in the bud. However, if these measures prove insufficient, it may be time to think about establishing a new trade zone, perhaps modeled on the Trans-Pacific Partnership, which would include only those nations committed to good innovation policies. Innovation is poised to continue to bring globally shared growth and prosperity–but policymakers must understand this will only happen if all countries are compelled to play by the rules mutually established by the international community to guide the economic interactions between nations.

Read the full article →

Video: Brokers Flee Brokerages as Big Banks’ Assets Decline

October 26, 2010

Oct. 26 (Bloomberg) — More than 7,300 brokers have left the four biggest full-service brokerages — Morgan Stanley Smith Barney, Merrill Lynch, Wells Fargo Advisors and UBS Wealth Management Americas — from the beginning of 2009 through June, according to financial services research firm Aite Group LLC in Boston and company filings. Assets under management at the four top brokerages also fell, dropping 16 percent to $4.75 trillion from 2007 through 2009, Aite Group. Bloomberg’s Brennan Lothery reports. (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Hutchinson and Bloodgood LLP Announces New Partner Promotions

October 26, 2010

GLENDALE, CA and EL CENTRO, CA–(Marketwire – October 26, 2010) –  Hutchinson and Bloodgood LLP, a leading Certified Public Accountant and Consulting firm serving businesses and residents for over eighty-eight years, is pleased to announce that the following individuals have been promoted to Partner:

Read the full article →

Leo Hindery, Jr.: Out of School, Out of Work, Out of Luck: The Youth Jobs Crisis

October 26, 2010

“For disadvantaged youth lacking basic education, failure to find a first job or keep it for long can have negative long-term consequences on their career prospects that some experts refer to as ‘scarring’. Beyond the negative effects on future wages and employability, long spells of unemployment while young often create permanent scars through the harmful effects on a number of other outcomes, including happiness, job satisfaction and health, many years later.” This language is from the 2010 report of the 33-member Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, and while meant to be a coda for all the members, it seems to have special applicability today to the biggest OECD member of all, which of course is the United States of America, where fully 5 million out-of-school youth are now unemployed. In all, there are now 30 million real unemployed Americans — not just the 15 million “officially” being counted by the Bureau of Labor Statistics — and they are all entitled to every reasonable public, private, ‘public & private’, and organized labor-based effort to find them employment. But we know that a jobless recovery can seem even more “jobless” to some out-of-work Americans than others, and right now it is our nation’s African Americans, Latinos, blue collar males with high school diplomas and older workers who are facing much higher unemployment rates than other Americans. Side by side with these unemployed workers for whom the challenge of reemployment is particularly high, however, are, as I said, five million youth who are desperately seeking initial employment. And this is not by any measure a static number, for each year, in recessions and in good times alike, another 6.4 million or so young people graduate from high school and college. Five million is a huge, unprecedented number of unemployed youth — in recent past recessions it never exceeded 1.5 to 2 million — and the reason that this issue is so important is because a young person’s prolonged delay into his first job has career-long impacts which show up as more limited job skills, fewer subsequent promotions and thus much lower lifetime income. These unemployed young people are entitled to a new, broad-based, government-supported “Youth Employment Initiative” that draws from our previous experiences with Roosevelt’s CCC, Kennedy’s VISTA and Peace Corps programs, and Johnson’s CETA program and from newer programs like Teach for America and CityBridge Foundation’s Service Corps program. Unfortunately, because there are few extant agencies or initiatives which, even with immediate additional funding, could accommodate these five million youth, this new program will have to be instantly created. New Deal-like programs for workers whose earnings immediately cycle back into the economy were once our specialty — they should be again. The CCC under Roosevelt found hundreds of thousands of entry-level jobs for young people, and almost all of the costs of the CCC immediately flowed back into small businesses in local areas. VISTA placed young volunteers in deeply rural and poor urban communities working on uplifting poverty reduction efforts. The Peace Corps is of course the nearly fifty-year old international version of VISTA, but with the energy that the Obama administration and friends in the Congress like Nita Lowey it is now a trajectory of growth and impact never seen before in its history. This year there will be 8,600 Peace Corps Volunteers, up from the 7,500 when President Obama took office, and the goal is to reach 10,000 volunteers in 2011, the actual 50th anniversary of the founding of the Corps. These are worthwhile goals that should be supported, especially because the Peace Corps is now doing an amazing job of supporting career placement of its volunteers when they return home to the U.S., which ties in perfectly with the unemployed youth programs we need to create nation-wide. Of the two newer programs, Teach for America, on the Board of which I serve and was for several years its Chairman, each year takes 5,000 remarkable new college graduates — out of an applicant pool ten times as large — and finds them two-year teaching assignments in some of our nation’s most challenged public elementary and middle schools. Founded in 1990, 60% of TFA’s corps members have remarkably chosen to continue their careers in education after their initial two-year assignments. ServiceCorps’ three signature programs connect workers with compelling community projects that create a lasting, positive impact on both employees and their community, with a noteworthy emphasis on entry level positions. All of these programs have repeatedly proven their value over time, with many positive long-term benefits. The unemployed youth problem in this country today may be unprecedented in size, but solutions for it are not without models and past successes to emulate. Unemployed youth in 2010 are at once different and the same as the unemployed youth in the prior nine recessions since the end of WW II. Whatever differences do exist are mostly nuances that should not hold us back from acting. As complements to the Youth Employment Initiative, Congress should undertake community-based federal government job creation in general, which would bring immediate benefit especially to those employment-challenged African Americans, Latinos, blue collar males with high school diplomas, and older workers to whom I earlier referred. These efforts should be directed at restoring our environment, policing communities, providing child care and tutoring, cleaning up abandoned houses and buildings, maintaining parks and public spaces, and preserving historic buildings. President Obama’s recently announced transportation-based infrastructure initiatives for the next Congress to consider should also be expanded to recognize the special travails confronting the harder-to-place unemployed and to include energy conservation work in our schools and municipal buildings. These latter efforts would bring to the table an extraordinary combination of good energy policy, help to domestic manufacturers of green products, and initial and re-employment of deeply at risk workers. The federal government should also take steps within existing programs, including the Workforce Investment Act, to provide additional incentives for job creation and training in much needed areas such as nursing, engineering and math & science instruction. And we should create a Teacher’s Aid Corps to complement the Teacher’s Corps, which should include allowing reasonable amounts of time for job searches and added training. One of the greatest opportunities for the out-of-school unemployed youth and even many older unemployed workers, however, will always be found in apprentice programs. That same 2010 report from the OECD lauded such programs for allowing young workers to acquire much needed skills and work experience. It pointed out, as an example, that Germany, which has a long and proud history of high-quality apprentice programs, has an almost unbelievable low ratio of youth unemployment to adult unemployment of only 1.5 to 1, compared to 2.8 to 1 across the entirety of the OECD including the U.S. International research suggests that there are few more viable ways of making a difference in the short-term, in the absence of an improved economy and more dynamic labor market, than from apprentice programs. For example, a pan-European study by the European Central Bank found that direct interventions such as preferential hiring policies and greater wage flexibility have relatively little impact on improving job prospects for young people when markets are generally slow. However, the higher rates of youth employment in countries with apprenticeship systems suggest that the development of education and training programs linked specifically to labor market needs are the most promising longer-term option. More generally, we also know that policies intended to increase the academic attainment levels of all students in the United States clearly help to improve the job prospects of young people in the longer-term, and thus maximize the contribution of this group to economic growth. So, let me add another initiative to consider. Since 2006, long before the depths of this Great Recession of 2007 made many things suddenly seem automatic, I have proposed that all fixes to our nation’s education travails should start with improving the economic plight of our K-12 teachers, which we know would also have great ripple effects on the employment future of the country’s high school students and graduates. Specifically, it’s time for these teachers to be given federal income-tax relief, and we will all be the beneficiaries when they get it. Here’s why this makes sense. According to numerous surveys, both the public and teachers want an increase in teacher pay. Of course, there are other pressing issues, including better facilities, better curricula, better-trained administrators, and greater parent involvement. But responses to these needs, because they involve overcoming ingrained bureaucratic obstacles and instilling personal motivation, will take years to effect and move through the system. So, let’s start by giving refundable tax credits to K-12 teachers at all accredited schools based on their qualifications and teaching specialties, in order to increase the pool of teachers in critically important areas such as languages, math and sciences, and instructing students who are economically disadvantaged or have disabilities. Effective salaries would immediately rise to more livable levels, and improved quality would follow right behind. Our country has a long successful record of using the tax code to reward what we as a society determine are desirable social actions. We agree, for example, that it’s important to encourage homeownership, so we allow homeowners to deduct all sorts of related costs. And in the 1960s we gave income-tax relief to those VISTA and Peace Corps volunteers because their work was deemed so important — and today we give substantial relief to our courageous and patriotic active-duty military personnel. But teachers are just as patriotic and important, their contributions to our nation’s vibrancy and economic well-being are exceptional, and vis-à-vis all other municipal professions (police, fire, general services) they are far and away the most difficult public servants to recruit and retain. America has approximately three million K-12 teachers, which is a big number, yet their aggregate federal income taxes run only about $15 billion to $20 billion a year. This is only about six-tenths of one percent or so of the U.S. Treasury’s expected total receipts in any year — or a couple of months’ worth of our ongoing expenditures in Afghanistan. As with any material change to the tax code, we would need to “pay” for this benefit to teachers. But even in these budget-starved times there are many thoughtful ways to do this, starting with once and for all closing the entirety of the ‘carried interest’ tax loophole, which alone would just about cover the annual cost of the proposed teachers benefit. All informed citizens, starting with teachers themselves, want high teaching standards and accountability. Federal income tax relief for teachers of the sort I describe would be a powerful response to this demand, and a just as powerful step toward assuring the long-term vibrancy of our society, the health of our national economy, and our global competitiveness. Let me close by briefly going back to those five million out-of-school unemployed youth, for in so many ways they seem to be ground-zero indicators of the nation’s overall jobless plight and our solutions to that plight. Virtually all of the recommendations in this piece call for a greater role for the government, and I don’t apologize for any of that, for when the mountain of woe is as high as it is now, you call for Edmund Hillary, which in this case is the government. But it can’t be just the government, since, as our kids might say, we also need beaucoup amounts of enlightened private sector involvement in these efforts. Responsible business leaders with a pervasive sense of concurrent and equal corporate responsibility to shareholders, employees, communities and the nation are the logical individuals to kick-start these additional job-creation efforts, for it is they who should have the foresight to see the obvious benefits. But these problems are so great and such an overhang on our economy that we need the inspiration and perspiration of the leaders at every level of our national community. Leo Hindery, Jr. is Chairman of the US Economy/Smart Globalization Initiative at the New America Foundation and a member of the Council on Foreign Relations. Currently an investor in media companies, he is the former CEO of Tele-Communications, Inc. (TCI), Liberty Media and their successor AT&T Broadband. He also serves on the Board of the Huffington Post Investigative Fund.

Read the full article →

Corrupt Nation Rankings Released

October 26, 2010

Transparency international released their 2010 Corruption Perception Index , which compiles data on public sector corruption and perceptions of corruption around the world. A three-way tie between Denmark, New Zealand and Singapore topped the list, while Somalia, Myanmar, Uzbekistan and Sudan were at the bottom. While some of the listings may seem obvious, others could surprise you. Check out the list below to see if your corruption perceptions match reality, and check out the full list here .

Read the full article →

John Feffer: What’s So Funny About Outsourcing?

October 26, 2010

What were NBC executives thinking? The unemployment rate remains near double digits, and many Americans have simply stopped looking for work. And what does the network premiere this fall but a sitcom called Outsourced about an American manager sent to run a call center in India. The jokes revolve around funny names, unappetizing food, Sikh turbans, arranged marriages. “It’s hard to know what a normal smell is here and what isn’t,” says Todd Dempsy, the culturally insensitive manager played by Ben Rappaport, in last week’s “Touched by an Anglo” episode . And there’s indeed something fishy about a show that capitalizes on U.S. jobs going overseas during an economic downturn. On the other hand, Outsourced introduces American viewers to bhangra music and lots of Indian faces. It makes fun of the inanities of American culture (bachelorette parties, pimping cars, fake vomit). The acting is pretty good, including the very funny Sacha Dhawan and Anisha Nagarajan. An inter-cultural romance beckons on the horizon. There’s even the occasionally pointed comment, such as the assistant manager Rajiv’s aside to his American boss that “this country is just a cash register to you.” And it’s hard to remember when a prime time show took place somewhere other than the United States. If you get all of your information about the world from network television, you might not even be able to locate Canada on a map (oh, yeah, that place just to the right of Northern Exposure ). The premise of Outsourced is that Todd, the American manager, is saddled with a B team of call center employees — quirky but loveable underdogs who are just struggling to get by. In other words, American audiences are being asked to sympathize with a group of Indian workers lucky to have the jobs that Americans have recently lost. That the show succeeds in finding an audience — an average of 6.3 million viewers a week, making the show the #1 new network show so far this season — is quite an achievement. Or it’s another sign of the gulf between cosmopolitans who benefit from globalization and blue-collar workers whose wages have gone steadily downhill because of competition from abroad. Some people appreciate the 24-hour customer service line, regardless of the accent of the person on the other end. Others are strictly “Buy American.” Of course, sometimes the same person lost her job last week at the factory and this week shops at WalMart to save money by getting cheap shirts from Sri Lanka, cheap produce from Mexico, and cheap Halloween decorations from China. President Barack Obama has been on both sides of the debate. During the presidential election, as Foreign Policy In Focus contributor Roger Bybee explains in Obama’s About-Face on Trade , “both Obama and rival candidate Hillary Clinton continued to focus on free trade and the flight of jobs offshore. They felt compelled to do so to woo Democratic voters infuriated by corporations abandoning U.S. workers and communities. These perceptions are validated by data from Public Citizen estimating that the United States has lost about 4.9 million jobs and 43,000 factories because of free trade deals like the North American Free Trade Agreement and normalization of trade relations with China.” As president, meanwhile, “Obama has been waging a long-running battle against offshoring in general, and to India in particular,” writes FPIF contributor Saif Shahin in Obama: Blowing It on India . “Last year, he urged U.S. companies to ‘say no to Bangalore, yes to Buffalo.’ Two months ago, he signed into law a steep hike in the fees of some visa categories preferred by professionals working for Indian companies where information technology (IT) jobs are outsourced. The extra money will go into building a better border fence with Mexico.” But the president has also supported free-trade agreements with South Korea, Panama, and Colombia. And he pushed through bailouts for U.S. companies without conditions that would have restricted their outsourcing of jobs. He surrounded himself with a free-trade clique from Wall Street, so what did you expect? Progressives face a somewhat different dilemma on this issue. On the one hand, we have always stood with labor unions to support the creation (and retention) of good manufacturing jobs. On the other hand, we push for the radical reduction in global poverty. The rise of new service and manufacturing centers in China and India alone has pulled hundreds of millions out of poverty. “It’s possible to make the case that China’s success in bringing masses of peasants out of poverty–as many as 400 million and counting–is the single most important event in the world in the past quarter-century,” writes Robert Dreyfuss in The Nation . “To be sure, much of China’s growth since the late ’70s has come at the expense of the environment and of workers laboring under atrocious conditions.” In theory, the two positions can be reconciled. We must back trade and other policies that raise wages and provide good benefits in countries that use low-wage labor as their comparative advantage. In the case of chocolate, for instance, it’s not just low-wage labor but child labor and slavery that goes into the making of so much of the candy we hand out on Halloween, as Andrew Korfhage explains in this OtherWords op-ed. Tax policies that reduce the enormous disparity between CEO pay and the rest of the workforce would also help to level the playing field. In this way the national interest would converge with the global interest. Even if passed, however, such reforms would take some before equalizing wages and reducing the flow of jobs from the United States to India. In the meantime, the opportunity to hire a workforce that can give you “follow-the-sun” service at low wages and in English is an irresistible combination. Moreover, it’s become more difficult in an age of sustainability to make the rising-tide- lifts-all-boats argument. Environmentalists acknowledge that U.S. consumers are simply going to have to cut back on our disproportionate use of world resources if we are to have an equitable solution to the climate change problem. It’s nice to argue that the wages and benefits of workers around the world should be raised to American standards (and preferably those of the 1960s before real wages started to decline). But like a world that owns as many cars as Americans, is such a global wage regime environmentally feasible? Or will the gradual rise of wages in places like China and India necessarily involve a gradual decline in wages in places like the United States and Europe? Don’t expect Outsourced to wrestle with these difficult questions. It’s a sitcom, after all. But it remains a remarkable change in the zeitgeist that millions of Americans are willing, week after week, to watch and root for so many non-Americans (who are not kicking a soccer ball). If nothing else, Outsourced humanizes the people so often demonized for taking American jobs. Even the Buy America crowd can take some measure of solace when watching the show. Except for a few framing shots, the show is filmed in Los Angeles with American actors. However, director Ken Kwapis says that if the show is successful , he’ll do more work on location. Is Outsourced itself going to be outsourced? Subscribe to FPIF’s World Beat here . Sign up with FPIF on Facebook . Follow FPIF on Twitter. Follow John Feffer on Twitter.

Read the full article →

Jeffrey Rubin: Tightening Oil Markets Will Bring the Speculators Back

October 26, 2010

With oil prices now already above $80 per barrel and likely to hit triple-digit levels within months, you can expect to hear a lot more about the role of speculators in the marketplace. It’s always easier to find a convenient whipping boy than to recognize that depletion and the prospect of ever more costly fuel in the future are the real problems. For many people, the fact that oil prices fell below $40 per barrel during the depths of the last recession meant that oil had no business ever trading at triple-digit levels in the first place. For them, $147-per-barrel oil was just a speculative bubble that, like all bubbles, inevitably burst. Few could deny that speculators weren’t long oil when it soared to almost $150 per barrel, just as they were short oil when prices came crashing down. But focusing on the role of speculators is very much putting the cart before the horse. What folks don’t mention is that when oil prices eventually crashed during the recession, so did oil demand–and not just speculative demand, but real economic demand. That’s what happens when essentially oil-powered economies experience severe contractions. In 2009, global oil demand fell for the first time since 1983–a testament to the severity of the last recession. While drivers may have liked the pump prices that came along with the recession, oil producers certainly didn’t. Investments in future production, from Brazilian deep-water to Canadian tar sands, were slashed literally overnight as the price of oil fell well below the cost of developing new supply. As I’ve said before, peak oil isn’t a problem if the economy it’s powering is shrinking. Triple-digit oil prices are only a problem if we want the economy they’re fuelling to grow. And most of us do. As I’ve also said previously, the first thing you identify in an economic recovery, even the most anemic one, is that the economy starts burning more oil. The next thing is that oil prices start rising rapidly. Already they’re at more than double the levels of the last recession’s lows, and that’s with most major oil-consuming economies (including the world’s largest oil guzzler, the US) still operating well below their pre-recession levels. Movements in oil prices have never been linear in the past, and there’s no reason to expect them to be so in the future. The interaction between genuine market forces and financial speculation is a fact of life in virtually all commodity markets. Speculators have been in the oil market before, and guess what? They’ll soon be back. And it will be the same pull as ever–that of a world ever more desperate for the increasingly expensive fuel that got them on the price bandwagon last cycle and that will soon draw them back again.

Read the full article →

Video: Fillion Says `Regulatory Arbitrage’ for Banks Possible: Video

October 26, 2010

Oct. 26 (Bloomberg) — Jean-Yves Fillion, head of North America client coverage at BNP Paribas, talks about U.S. and European regulation of the financial industry. Fillion talks with Lisa Murphy on Bloomberg Television’s “Fast Forward.” (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

James M. Russell: Chris Rabb Talks Invisible Capital

October 26, 2010

When asked about the overriding concept of his new book, Invisible Capital: How Unseen Forces Shapes Entrepreneurial Opportunity , Chris Rabb put it in five simple words: “why Donald Trump is evil.” Though he says this with a laugh, Trump nonetheless represents to Rabb “how we view entrepreneurship, transcendent of political ideology” and why “a lot of people still believe there’s a meritocracy within [entrepreneurship].” This well-researched and argued book digs deep into the unseen privileges evident in even the most equitable business models. Rabb and I met recently to discuss this and other concepts in his new book. James M. Russell: So what is invisible capital? Chris Rabb: Essentially, invisible capital is human, social and cultural capital and the ways in which they manifest: human capital being your skills, credentials and experiences; social capital being your network and what they think of you; and cultural capital being how you operate in different environments and your ability to communicate in ways that inspire confidence and create opportunity. Though the top predictors for success in business are not race, class or gender that doesn’t mean that the most successful elements of an entrepreneur aren’t related to one’s race, class, or gender. If we talk about invisible capital and how it is manifested, we will be directly dealing with race, class and gender in a meaningful way. JMR: Why did you choose entrepreneurship as the topic? CR: A lot of people simply don’t have the literacy about American entrepreneurship that can actually help them start and run a business or even be an advocate for people who start enterprises, whether for profit or non-profit. But because we do not have that literacy, we do not have the structure nor the capacity to help people in meaningful ways. Right now, it is about rugged individualism. The people we could help, as well as the entrepreneurs, believe this notion that, regardless of background, they’ll just work harder. Because you know, if you watch Oprah and you have that positive attitude, you can do anything. There’s no evidence that proves this myth – because that is what it is: a myth. So the book tries to have us understand that there are different ways of defining entrepreneurship. JMR: Is there a correlation between your solution and social entrepreneurship? CR: Yeah, this overlaps the social entrepreneurship but a lot of advocates of social entrepreneurship do not talk about invisible capital.. Social entrepreneur’s projects require massive resources and a select group of consumers to buy the stuff they sell and often times, leverage pre-existing privileges that by definition excludes others. So if you don’t come to talk about the structural issues that create this invisible capital, then you’re doing a good thing, but you’re not really changing anything structurally. While my solution, commonwealth enterprises, create community assets for shared prosperity, that’s not necessarily the case with social entrepreneurship. Ben and Jerry’s is a good example of a social enterprise. They make great ice cream in a country that is obese. They gave more money to good causes than most corporations of the same size – before they sold out to multinational that is. But at the end of the day, they had a conventional product that was not particularly healthy. Ultimately if you talk about entrepreneurship as a vital part of the economy, you talk about creating businesses that will be self-sustaining and sustain communities and local economies JMR: What kind of existing enterprises are considered “commonwealth”? CR: We need to innovate entrepreneurship. The co-op model is one way which commonwealth enterprises can be facilitated but there are also other forms like low profit limited liability companies, l3cs or certified B corps Benefit corporations, as they’re called. These are just a few of the structural ways to look at building shared prosperity and community assets. JMR: You mention in the book that entrepreneurship transcends political ideology. Explain. CR: Politically, those of us who care about these issues in the terms of how progressive it is, are not invested. Mostly because many people who self identify as progressive or left feel that you have to French kiss capitalism to talk about entrepreneurship. You don’t. Entrepreneurship predates capitalism and there’s nothing inherent in entrepreneurship that is about profit maximization. JMR: Any final thoughts about your book? CR: It’s like the two fish: two fish were swimming along in the ocean and one fish looks at the other and says, “I love the water.” And the other fish looks at him and says, “What’s water?” At some point, somebody is going to have to acknowledge the obvious thing, that we’re surrounded by water and air. But if you don’t ever think about breathing nor the composition of air nor how the lungs work, you can make a lot of bad decisions. And the same thing is true with regard to entrepreneurship. Thank you to Natalie Trujillo for her help with this interview.

Read the full article →

Video: Dobson Says Risk of Capital Flows to Housing Compounded

October 26, 2010

Oct. 26 (Bloomberg) — Sean Dobson, chairman and chief executive officer of Amherst Securities Group LP, talks with Bloomberg’s Lisa Murphy about capital flows into the U.S. housing market. Dobson, speaking from the Economist magazine’s Buttonwood Gathering in New York, also discusses the role of credit-rating companies. (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Video: Tang Says Rapid Yuan Appreciation `Terrible for America’: Video

October 26, 2010

Oct. 26 (Bloomberg) — Donald Tang, chief executive officer at Citic Securities International Partners, talks about the outlook for Chinese currency policy, opportunities for U.S. investment in China and the outlook for the nation’s economy. Tang talks with Margaret Brennan on Bloomberg Television’s “InBusiness.” (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Video: Gross Says Public Deserves Disclosure of Campaign Funds

October 26, 2010

Oct. 26 (Bloomberg) — Kenneth Gross, partner at Skadden Arps Slate Meagher & Flom and a former general counsel to the Federal Election Commission, talks about political campaign contribution rules and the influence anonymous donations could have on the midterm elections. Gross speaks with Margaret Brennan on Bloomberg Television’s “InBusiness.” (This is an excerpt of the full interview. Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Eric Gaydon Joins C2 Reprographics as Director of Color Operations; Steve Spang and Eric Monroe Promoted

October 26, 2010

COSTA MESA, CA–(Marketwire – October 26, 2010) – Costa Mesa-based C2 Reprographics has hired a new Director of Color Operations and promoted two key employees.

Read the full article →

G.W. Schulz: With Border Surveillance in Trouble, a New Defense Contractor Lines Up

October 26, 2010

At a mid-October conference in Dallas that drew thousands of security industry professionals and government officials, defense mega-contractor Raytheon Co. unveiled its latest pricey product for keeping the nation safe, a bid to remotely detect would-be border crossers before they enter the country illegally. Command-and-control centers staffed by border patrol agents would swiftly collect and analyze mountains of data pouring in from surveillance cameras, radar systems, ground sensors and thermal-image devices busily monitoring possible intruders as they streamed toward the nation’s border. If all of this is starting to sound familiar, it should. Taxpayers have already shelled out at least $615 million to another major defense firm, Boeing Co., which made strikingly similar promises five years ago when it partnered with the Bush administration to create SBInet, a high-tech leg of the larger Secure Border Initiative . SBInet, also referred to as the “virtual fence,” called for filling the desert with modern observation widgets, including a string of towers topped by digital eyes capable of vastly expanding the miles of border that enforcement officers could otherwise effectively secure. The project has since fallen short of expectations, to put it lightly. A series of harsh reviews from congressional investigators at the Government Accountability Office and the Department of Homeland Security’s inspector general have criticized SBInet since its earliest days, pointing to poor planning, cost overruns, scheduling setbacks, technical failures and weak contractor oversight. The latest negative assessment surfaced just days after Raytheon’s announcement. GAO watchdogs called the deficient policing of SBInet’s prime contractor “a major contributor to the program’s well-chronicled history of not delivering promised system capabilities on time and on budget.” Word came Oct. 22 that the Department of Homeland Security would not continue work under Boeing’s contract, and the next day news surfaced that Obama administration officials planned to halt SBInet altogether. Connecticut Sen. Joe Lieberman, chair of the powerful Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, at an April hearing , called SBInet “a classic example of a program that was grossly oversold.” Colleague John McCain — hardly soft-spoken on the issue of border security this election year — piled on. “There’s been a lack of oversight. There’s been a lack of accountability. And by most reports, this virtual fence has been a complete failure.” So why is Raytheon charting a course toward border surveillance after so many costly headaches? For one thing, the Massachusetts-based company was among several that lost an earlier bid for the SBInet contract to Boeing in 2006. Raytheon may now be looking for a second chance to prove itself and simply take over where Boeing has been unsuccessful, rather than offer an entirely different solution with new hardware. (Requests for comment from Raytheon went unanswered.) Plus, the company is smarting over attempts to ink border security deals with Saudi Arabia and the U.K. worth a combined $4.5 billion that fell through. It’s also the case that 20,000 border patrol officers just aren’t enough to cool the ongoing national furor over illegal immigration and drug-cartel violence, even if the estimated price tag of each new hire is $160,000 for background checks, salaries, night-vision goggles and additional necessities. The promise of modern technology continues to be powerfully tempting, and if taxpayers will pony up more, then Raytheon wants a cut. While SBInet appears doomed, lawmakers and federal officials are still talking about what options may be available. GOP Congressman Michael McCaul of Texas sits on the House’s Homeland Security Committee and has said he’ll push for Defense Department technology being used in Afghanistan and Iraq. A DHS spokesman told the Los Angeles Times that border officials will determine “if there are alternatives that may more efficiently, effectively and economically meet our nation’s border security needs.” What exists on the border now is piecemeal. For the total investment so far from taxpayers, which is somewhere in the neighborhood of $800 million or more, two SBInet deployments cover about 53 miles in Arizona, a sliver of the almost 2,000 miles of border the nation shares with Mexico and far from what was originally envisioned. Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano earlier this year yanked $50 million in economic stimulus funds from SBInet, vowing to use it for truck-mounted cameras and other detection gear authorities believed could produce better results. A $600 million border security bill passed by Congress this summer included hiring additional agents and buying new pilotless drones, with $100 million of it coming from canceled SBInet funds. Raytheon says its own “Clear View,” as they’re calling the system, can be integrated with software and devices built by others. But the process of tying together, or integrating, SBInet’s array of highly technical components along a geographically diverse border — from laser range-finders to surveillance cameras to command centers — proved to be exceedingly difficult for Boeing. Trade publications say Raytheon doesn’t limit the application of Clear View just to government clients. It could also be used by private companies to secure sensitive manufacturing facilities, for example. But Washington always has money to spend, and Raytheon emphasizes Clear View’s potential value to the Department of Homeland Security. A former deputy chief of the Border Patrol, who now consults for Raytheon, told Government Security News the company had briefed senior federal officials about Clear View. Raytheon specifically mentioned SBInet at the conference where it showcased the system, arguing Clear View is superior to what Boeing has done because Raytheon’s software can not only “see” those headed for the border but track their movements, all while “correlating thousands of pieces of ever-changing data and presenting a clear and coherent picture of what’s happening at any given moment,” according to GSN . SBInet wasn’t even the first time we forked over substantial sums in an attempt at digital border security. The Clinton administration launched its lesser-known ISIS program in 1997, a planned network of seismic and infrared sensors combined with surveillance cameras. Auditors blasted it, too. For their part, Boeing executives defend SBInet and say the technology had begun to perform reliably, leading to the seizure of narcotics and interception of illegal border crossers. “In terms of performance on the program, progress is evident,” Boeing’s president of network and space systems, Roger Krone, told Congress in March. Apparently that wasn’t enough for Washington — SBInet is now an expensive lesson taxpayers had to learn the hard way. How much more would Raytheon charge for the privilege? G.W. Schulz joined the Center for Investigative Reporting in 2008 to launch its ongoing homeland security project. Read the project’s blog, Elevated Risk, here .

Read the full article →

Case-Shiller Index: Home Prices Fall In August As Market Shows Signs Of Trouble

October 26, 2010

WASHINGTON (AP, BY ALAN ZIBEL) — Home prices are weakening around the country, even in metro areas that were showing strength earlier in the year. The Standard & Poor’s/Case-Shiller 20-city home price index released Tuesday fell 0.2 percent in August from July. Fifteen of the cities showed monthly price declines. Prices are expected to drop further in the coming months. The biggest drop came in Phoenix. Prices there fell 1.3 percent from a month earlier. And prices in three California cities that had been rebounding — San Francisco, San Diego and Los Angeles — fell by less than 1 percent in August from July. Detroit, Chicago, Washington, New York and Las Vegas were the only cities to show monthly price increases. The 20-city index has risen 6.7 percent from its April 2009 bottom. But it remains nearly 28 percent below its July 2006 peak. A higher proportion of foreclosed homes likely pushed down California markets, said David Blitzer, the S&P index’s chairman. During the summer, foreclosures were moving swiftly. That was before allegations surfaced of mortgage lenders using flawed documents to foreclose on homes. Lenders responded by freezing foreclosures in many states. Even with the declines, the San Francisco area’s home prices have surged more than 21 percent from spring 2009, when they hit bottom. Prices in San Diego have risen nearly 14 percent and in Los Angeles they have increased by more than 10 percent in that same period. Home prices would have to rise by more than 50 percent in each of the markets to return to their peaks during the housing boom. Those California cities “had come back very fast and very strongly,” Blitzer said. “Prices come down when you get a lot more foreclosures.” Problems with flawed foreclosure paperwork could weaken home prices. That would happen if buyers fear purchasing foreclosed homes because the sale could be contested — or even canceled — if the previous owner claims the foreclosure was invalid. In an October survey taken by the National Association of Realtors, about 23 percent of real estate agents said they have a client who is no longer interested in purchasing a foreclosed property due to the foreclosure-document mess. In the short run, however, the documents problem could prop up sale prices if fewer foreclosed homes are put up for sale. Home prices rose in many markets from April through July. But those increases were mostly fueled by government tax credits, which have expired. Now that the peak buying season is over, a record number of foreclosures, job concerns and weak demand from buyers are pushing prices down. Most experts expect roughly 5 million homes to be sold through the entire year. That would be in line with last year’s totals and just above sales for 2008, the worst since 1997.

Read the full article →

Ifbyphone Names Jason Ferrara Vice President of Marketing

October 26, 2010

CHICAGO, IL–(Marketwire – October 26, 2010) –   Ifbyphone , an industry leading customer interaction company, today announced a key addition to its executive team with the hire of Jason Ferrara as Vice President of Marketing. Ferrara comes to his new role from another rapidly growing Chicago company, the nation’s largest online job site CareerBuilder.com. As Vice President Corporate Marketing at CareerBuilder.com Ferrara was responsible for business-to-business strategy, including communications, advertising, promotions, product marketing, e-commerce management, customer lifecycle and loyalty, and sales support. 

Read the full article →

Homeowners Protest HAMP: ‘It’s Just A Scam And The Banks Are Getting Everything’

October 26, 2010

WASHINTON — Judy Stratton said she and her husband Harry have tried since January 2009 to modify the mortgage on their home in Stayton, Ore. after a drop-off in demand for Harry’s floor maintenance services. In August, Stratton said, they received a rejection letter from their bank saying they did not qualify for help per the Obama administration’s Home Affordable Modification Program. “This was a lie — 100 percent lie,” Stratton said. “We ran off the guidelines. We met every single qualification to get a HAMP mod.” Nevertheless, Stratton said a foreclosure sale is scheduled for Nov. 24. She reached out to her friend Peggy Merrill, who attends the church where Stratton is music director. “I got together with Peggy and I was in tears: ‘We’re losing our house over a pack of lies!’” Merrill started doing some research into HAMP and did not like what she learned. “I was concerned about their house, but the more I got into it — it’s my tax money, $75 billion worth,” Merrill told HuffPost. “It’s just a scam and the banks are getting everything.” So they took to the streets. Merrill helped the Strattons organize what might have been the first grassroots anti-HAMP protest on Friday and Saturday. A group of six people picketed outside the state capitol in Salem, Ore. for six hours each day with signs that said things like “HOMES FORECLOSED – Your Tax $’s At Work.” Here’s what the protest looked like at the state capitol in Salem: Another: HAMP was initially funded with $50 billion in Wall Street bailout money and $25 billion from taxpayer-owned Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Struggling homeowners are supposed to be eligible for the program if they live in their home, owe less than $729,750, and their mortgage payments amount to more than 31 percent of their monthly payments — and they have to prove it. Qualified borrowers who successfully make three months of reduced “trial” payments are supposed to be put into five-year “permanent” modifications. It often doesn’t work out that way, as mortgage servicers lose paperwork and homeowners discover that the foreclosure process has moved faster than the trial process. President Obama said the program would help three to four million people modify their mortgages. But through September, 728,686 struggling homeowners have been kicked out of the program; just 640,300 remain, the Treasury Department reported on Monday. In a separate report on Monday, a federal watchdog said that some people who apply for HAMP “end up unnecessarily depleting their dwindling savings in an ultimately futile effort to obtain the sustainable relief promised by the program guidelines,” and that “even in circumstances where they never missed a payment, they may face back payments, penalties, and even late fees that suddenly become due on their ‘modified’ mortgages and that they are unable to pay, thus resulting in the very loss of their homes that HAMP is meant to prevent.” Judy Stratton said she has reached out to her congressman and her senators but she doesn’t know what to do next. She said, “My gosh — there’s no help.”

Read the full article →

Video: Faber Interview on U.S. Stocks, Fed Policy

October 26, 2010

Oct. 26 (Bloomberg) — Marc Faber, publisher of the Gloom, Boom & Doom report, discusses the potential impact of further quantitative easing by the Federal Reserve on stocks. Faber, speaking with Margaret Brennan on Bloomberg Television’s “InBusiness,” says more monetary easing could disappoint investors and may prompt a correction in U.S. stocks. (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Doug Kendall: The Chamber, Citizens United, and the Campaign for the Third Branch

October 26, 2010

Last week, investigators at the Center for American Progress released a bombshell , making public confidential materials penned by energy tycoon Charles Koch for a conference of well-heeled conservative activists this past June. These materials also included an invitation to far-right money men and women to another gathering scheduled for next January, to plan the takeover of the White House in 2012. While helping reveal the right’s political agenda, these materials also show just how central the courts are to their plans. For one surprising example, two names topped the list of luminaries who had previously attended Koch’s gatherings: Supreme Court Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas. Furthermore, consider the Chamber of Commerce, and the topic for discussion they chose for Koch’s gathering this past June. In the middle of a heated battle over the control of Congress — a fight that has crystallized the Chamber’s status as a leading financier of conservative causes — the Chamber chose to speak about the opportunity to win judicial elections and capture the state courts. This laser-like focus on the courts is missing on the left, which is far more focused on winning elections and legislative battles. But what if those legislative victories are overturned by the activist rulings of conservative judges? That is already happening in cases such as Citizens United v. FEC , where last January the Supreme Court gutted by a 5-4 vote the McCain-Feingold Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act — a law that progressive funders and activists had spent more than a decade mobilizing to produce. Citizens United is hardly an isolated example. In June, in the wake of Citizens United , the organization I head, Constitutional Accountability Center, comprehensively examined cases decided by the Supreme Court in which the Chamber of Commerce filed briefs since Justice Samuel Alito began participating in decisions in early 2006. Over this nearly five-year period (through the end of June 2010), the Chamber prevailed in 68 percent of its cases. The Chamber was even more successful in the October 2009 Term, winning over 80 percent of its cases (13 victories in 16 cases). Our study also demonstrated a pronounced ideological divide on the Court on Chamber positions: the Court’s conservative majority (Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Alito, Kennedy, Scalia, and Thomas) collectively voted for the Chamber 74 percent of the time while the Court’s moderate/liberal bloc (including former Justice David Souter, who was on the Court for most of these rulings) was more centrist, collectively casting 43% of its votes in favor of the Chamber. The response to our June study, even among many liberals in the Washington legal community, was muted. Indeed, Justice Breyer — who voted for the Chamber less than half the time in our June study — came to the Chamber’s defense, telling Bloomberg News that the Chamber’s recent success before the Court was nothing new because the Chamber has always done well before the Court. A follow-up study released today by Constitutional Accountability Center demonstrates that to be flat wrong. CAC studied the 5-year period immediately before any of the members of the Court’s current conservative majority took the bench. During the five Supreme Court Terms from October 1981 to June 1986, the Court ruled in the Chamber’s favor just 43% of the time. Even more striking was the lack of any comparable ideological divide on the Court during this earlier era. For example, the voting records of then-Justice William Rehnquist, widely viewed as the most conservative member of the Court of that era, and Justice William Brennan, its most liberal member, differed by only three points in support for the Chamber — 47% compared to 44%, respectively. Rehnquist and Brennan waged heated battles over hot-button social issues such as reproductive choice and affirmative action, but they did not battle often over the law’s impact on corporations. Not surprisingly, the Justice voting most often in favor of the Chamber in our earlier study was Lewis Powell. Justice Powell was a moderate on social issues and the Burger Court’s swing Justice on those topics. But he had also represented the Chamber of Commerce in private practice and penned a now famous 1971 memorandum instructing the Chamber to take advantage of a “neglected opportunity in the courts.” For the past 40 years, the Chamber of Commerce and its allies have taken to heart Justice Powell’s advice and worked tirelessly and step-by-step to push for a judiciary that is sympathetic to its legal arguments. How sympathetic? Consider that during the period of our 1981-1986 study, Justice Powell — the most pro-Chamber judge of his era — voted with the Chamber 59 percent of the time. His replacement, Justice Anthony Kennedy — the most moderate member of the Roberts Court’s conservative wing — voted with the Chamber 69 percent of the time during the period of our study of the Roberts Court. There has been a ton of coverage this election season of the Chamber of Commerce’s undisclosed donors and multi-million dollar expenditures on Congressional races across the country. But the Chamber’s efforts in the judicial arena have remained largely underneath the radar. This imbalance of attention is unfortunate, because while the success of the Chamber’s attempt to influence the mid-term election remains to be seen, we already know that the Chamber’s decades-long effort to influence the judiciary has been a resounding success.

Read the full article →

Video: Johnson Sees Juniper Growth on Mobile Web, Cloud Data: Video

October 26, 2010

Oct. 26 (Bloomberg) — Kevin Johnson, chief executive officer of Juniper Networks Inc., talks about his company’s smartphone security software for corporate customers and growth strategy. The package of programs is designed to secure e-mail and other information as employees transfer it between corporate networks and devices including Apple Inc.’s iPhone, Research In Motion Ltd.’s BlackBerry and handsets that run Google Inc.’s Android operating system, Juniper said today. Johnson speaks with Margaret Brennan on Bloomberg Television’s “InBusiness.” (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Video: Spier Says Buffett Treads `Fine Balance’ on Succession

October 26, 2010

Oct. 26 (Bloomberg) — Guy Spier, chief executive officer of Aquamarine Capital LLC, talks about succession planning at Berkshire Hathaway Inc. and hedge fund manager Todd Combs, who has named by Warren Buffett to run a “significant portion” of Berkshire’s investment portfolio. Todd Combs, who manages about $400 million in financial-services shares at Castle Point Capital in Greenwich, Connecticut, becomes an investment manager, Berkshire said. Spier speaks with Betty Liu on Bloomberg Television’s “In the Loop.” (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Video: GE Wins India Turbine Order; BMW Sales Practices Probed

October 26, 2010

Oct. 26 (Bloomberg) — Bloomberg’s Gigi Stone reports on the latest breaking news and top stories in today’s Business Briefs. (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Engage121 Strengthens Team, Announces Two Key Appointments

October 26, 2010

CEO Jon Victor Taps Jack Serpa & Nick Perold to Extend Engage121′s Leadership in Social Media Monitoring & Engagement

Read the full article →

MIT Entrepreneurship Review: JetPens: How To Be An Entrepreneur On Your Own Terms

October 26, 2010

“I didn’t have a very specific vision for a company. I wanted to do something that would increase the probability of success, and I also didn’t particularly want to answer to investors,” says JetPens co-founder Adrian Mak, who started his company in 2004 with an initial investment of $9,000. The company managed to achieve profitability after two years, without any additional financing, by selling Japanese pens, pencils and stationery to pen fanatics. Since characters in Asian alphabets are much more complex than the English alphabet, the writing instruments available in Asia are much more precise than those in the US. Because they never had to sell any equity to outside investors, the three founding partners have retained autonomy over the business and its profits and have shaped the organization to fit their personal goals. Of all the possibilities, why pens? AM: We saw from online forums that people were looking for them and realized that online retail fit our skill set well. We also saw that we could try it out in a way that wouldn’t be very capital-intensive. To start out, we spent about $5000 on merchandise, launched a cheap pilot to prove the business model, and got good results. So in at the beginning, you focused instead on proving the business model and bringing up the business? AM: Although some people perceive entrepreneurship as risky, we tried to create a scenario to minimize risk. We did things in a non-capital-intensive way. We avoided outside investors so we could keep control. We did a lot of things to save money in the beginning; for example, we didn’t spend any money on advertising early on because we had more time than money. We spent a lot of time doing online social marketing and search optimization. How else did your limited budget affect your strategy in the beginning? AM: A lot of our decision-making was driven by our lack of financial resources. It didn’t make sense to outsource warehousing either at our initial scale, so we kept all our merchandise in my living room, which was also our first office. Actually, I’d say all these decisions were made because we had no money, but we had a lot of desire. As for our marketing strategy in 2004, Facebook was just getting started and Twitter didn’t exist. Blogs and forums were really useful in our early days. This helped us with search engine rankings and driving traffic to the website. What advice would you give aspiring entrepreneurs, especially those who are still in school? AM: If you are young and don’t have a lot of obligations, just go for it. When you come up with your business plan, it doesn’t have to be really elaborate. Just work out the core economics of your business and work from there. I made a one-page spreadsheet to figure out how much money I needed to live on, and how many units we would have to sell to reach that number. It turned out that the number was within reason, and this spreadsheet was half our business plan. What would you say to aspiring entrepreneurs who are trying to figure out their motivations and values? AM: With the benefit of hindsight, I’d highly recommend understanding psychologically why you want to be an entrepreneur, because there are several good reasons. Do you primarily want to gain financial freedom, to make a big impact, to become a billionaire, or to create your ideal work environment? You want to gear your business decisions to reflect this, and good decisions should flow out of your core psychological desire — especially the type and size of market you decide to pursue, decisions about raising money and setting your company’ s level of aggressiveness. Check out the MIT Entrepreneurship Review for more information on Adrian and JetPens. You can also follow the MIT Entrepreneurship Review on Twitter at @ MITEReview .

Read the full article →

Lita Smith-Mines: The Signs, They Are A-Fadin’

October 26, 2010

Driving along a large retail road the other evening, I wondered where the florist on a very busy corner went. Moreover, what the heck was ORIS, which the display sign proclaimed was sold there instead? Nearby there was an ELI and a KE SHOP and a CE BA. Across the street was a JEWE and a MAR AR STUD. Further down I spied TY SUPPLIES, ACY and SSAGES. Had all the local businesses failed, and what were these strange stores peddling? Now that I was focusing, I saw that more than a few of the retail establishments bearing the name of my home town of Commack now had only the letters ACK or MMA or COMM lit up across the front of their store. It dawned on me that I didn’t happen to drive down the turnpike on the day a bulb or two burned atop one store or another. What I was seeing was the combined neglect of many retailers (or landlords), who individually may have thought better of shelling out the money it took to restore the B and the A and the G over the bagel store or to pay the electric bill for a lighted logo display during this depressing recession. Maybe there were bigger priorities than reenergizing the CHIN above the store that now proclaimed it sold ESE FOOD. If the ingredients couldn’t be bought and the cooks paid, the restaurant would surely go under. From the looks of it, perhaps the store that caters to “big & tall” men needed to worry about paying for the merchandise on its shelves. In that case, it might be understandable why they delayed fixing the G & TALL ME sign. Landlords with fewer tenants could certainly plot out a way to string along the last few renters by postponing the maintenance on a shopping center’s nighttime signage. As an observer merely driving by store after store after store adorned with strange arrangements of letters, I cannot know how much thought each retailer or property owner puts into the lighted logos. It is logical to suppose that they spend their days and nights worrying about paying for inventory, meeting payroll, and otherwise finding the cash to keep their doors open. However, I do know that the local mom & pop, bricks & mortar establishments are having a hell of a time surviving this economic climate. Thus, the lack of illumination at such stores can’t bode well for their continued existence. How will things improve for the pizza store that will bring the food to me if the glow above their doorframe shouts WE DELIV? Will anyone driving along at night know that a local jeweler guarantees to pay the best price for gold if all they see is W PAY TOP $$ FO? If a hungry driver is looking on both sides of the street for an enticing place to stop, I’m willing to bet that the eatery offering BUG & FRI is probably not going to be very tempting.

Read the full article →

Conihasset Capital Partners Announces Changes to Its Board of Directors and Formation of New Subsidiary

October 26, 2010

BOSTON, MA–(Marketwire – October 26, 2010) –  Conihasset Capital Partners, Inc. ( PINKSHEETS : CNHA ) (the “Company”) has announced that Bradley J. Hoecker has been appointed Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”). Mr. Hoecker succeeds former Chairman Lawrence Lipsher who remains on the Board as an independent member as well as the Chairman of the Compensation Committee. Jerry Julian also remains on the Board as an independent member and the Chairman of the Audit Committee. Paul Sonkin, Manager of the Hummingbird Value Fund, resigned from the Board in February 2010.

Read the full article →

Video: Fed Won’t Join Bank Group Appeal on Loan Disclosures

October 26, 2010

Oct. 26 (Bloomberg) — The Federal Reserve won’t join a banking industry trade group in asking the U.S. Supreme Court to let the government continue to withhold details of emergency loans made to financial firms in 2008. The Clearing House Association LLC, a group of the biggest commercial banks, is appealing a lower court order requiring the Federal Reserve to disclose lending records to Bloomberg LP, parent company of Bloomberg News. A federal judge ruled in August 2009 that the Fed had to disclose the names of banks that borrowed from its emergency lending programs. Bloomberg’s Michael McKee reports. (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Jamie Court: President Should Stop BP Administrator Feinberg From Helping The Chamber Of Commerce

October 26, 2010

You’re the President of the United States on the verge of a historic election. So you’re going to let one of your most important appointees give credibility to your biggest opponent and the BP spill victims’ greatest enemy, the Chamber of Commerce? BP Fund Administrator Kenneth Feinberg is scheduled for the keynote address at the Chamber of Commerce’s Institute for Legal Reform Wednesday. This is the oil-backed arm of the Chamber that wants to take away the legal rights of spill victims, and the rest of us too. So why is the President going to let Feinberg go? Obama should force Feinberg to withdraw or fire him. My letter to Obama today on behalf of Consumer Watchdog lays out the case for why this is just wrong. Given the Chamber’s controversial role in the 2010 election, the organization’s commitment to deny individual citizens their right to hold large corporations accountable and Mr. Feinberg’s own troubled record when it comes to administering the BP Victims Fund, it is highly inappropriate and probably unethical for Feinberg to go. Let’s start with the election. There is no greater threat to voters getting all the information they need to make an informed choice in the election next Tuesday than the Chamber of Commerce. Days before an election, Mr. Feinberg should not be credentialing one of its most anti-American causes — stripping citizens of their legal rights. The Chamber is engaging in one of the largest corporate campaign contribution laundering schemes in U.S. history. The President rightfully made public his concerns that the Chamber’s efforts to funnel millions of corporate dollars from undisclosed donors is compromising our democratic processes. Last Friday’s New York Times investigative report confirmed the fact that concealed donations to the Chamber’s efforts come from big oil, Wall Street tycoons and insurance industry trying to roll back financial protections, thwart the implementation of health care reform and shred environmental protections. The fact that the Chamber is largely hiding such activities from the American public is particularly troubling for our democracy. In California, for example, we at Consumer Watchdog have seen a Chamber-backed political action committee, JobsPAC, receive $3.8 million from the insurance industry for television commercials to elect the industry’s candidate for insurance commissioner. Television commercials for the industry’s candidate don’t disclose that the source of the contributions is from the insurance industry, only the Chamber’s committee. So the commercials can say the candidate for insurance commissioner is fighting the very insurance industry that is surreptitiously funding the advertisements. Now take a look at the Chamber’s Legal Institute. The Chamber’s Institute for Legal Reform has led deceptive efforts to change the composition of state supreme courts in order to make them pro-business and anti-consumer. Feinberg himself has been slow to pay compensation to victims of BP’s Gulf spill, largely small businesses and individuals. While he forces claimants to jump through bureaucratic hoops and provide endless paperwork, he accepts multimillion-dollar compensation from BP under a contract that has not been fully made public. The Chamber’s activities aimed at thwarting consumer rights and oil industry environmental safety in the Gulf may create an outright conflict of interest for Feinberg: • The Chamber has lobbied against the Death on the High Seas Act (as well as the whole SPILL Act that passed the House). • The Institute’s 990 Internal Revenue Service tax filing show that several oil companies sit on the board of their Institute for Legal Reform. Charles James is EVP at Chevron and Charles Matthews is General Counsel at Exxon. Mark Holden is Senior Vice President and General Counsel of Koch Industries. • The Chamber filed amicus briefs supporting Exxon as it fought punitive damages post-Valdez. That is here: http://secure.uschamber.com/NR/rdonlyres/ew3o3lcvdfcby5nnnpqkstiww3sdjucpeg5np5asvytg72zv2donrmfd5jo2xbfjlzqi75sz2drtlgnuufov53pn5sg/exxonshippingcovbakersc.pdf • The Chamber has been especially involved in Louisiana. The Institute for Legal Reform owns an outlet called Louisiana Record that is a propaganda outlet and has consistently ranked Louisiana at the bottom of their legal rankings list. http://www.instituteforlegalreform.com/lawsuit-climate.html The President shouldn’t allow his appointees to be helping the enemy of his Administration and the spill victims in the Gulf. All he needs to do is pick up the phone this time. Will he? ———————————————————————- Jamie Court is author of The Progressive’s Guide To Raising Hell http://www.raisinghellguide.com and president of Consumer Watchdog.

Read the full article →

Georges Ugeux: It’s the Dollar, Stupid

October 26, 2010

As hard to believe as it might be, the US authorities have discredited themselves in the handling of the so-called “currency crisis” and at the recent meeting of the G 20 Finance Ministers. For months, the Administration has tried to convince us that the future of the world economy was dependant on the exchange rate of the Yuan. The reality is very different. The United States keep its interest rates at historically low levels in order to stimulate the economy, and to indirectly support the banking system in its racketeering of consumers. By doing so, its interest rates no longer cover the “risk factor” that the markets consider to reflect its over-indebtedness. Such a policy is an answer to the slow economic recovery and high unemployment. It is perfectly coherent from a pure domestic viewpoint. At the international level, the insufficient remuneration of US Treasuries has a disastrous effect. First, it confirms the irresponsibility of the United States towards its international obligations. Nothing new. Since the “benevolent neglect” of the United States towards the dollar in the seventies, all US Administrations have neglected their responsibilities as the issuer of the most important currency in the world. It is their way to make the rest of the world pay for their defense umbrella. Or so the story goes. Regularly, the United States (and Larry Summers was the first engineer) went to visit foreign countries so that they act “responsibly” by increasing the value of their currency. Japan and China have been the prime targets of such policies. We fail to recognize that there might be some reasons why the dollar is structurally weak and neglected by its issuer: the Federal Reserve. Behind the currency debate, lies a somber reality. Most of China’s exports are the result of the relocation of production outside of the United States. It is American corporations that fuel the balance of payment deficit. Apparently this is for “competitive reasons.” To be clear, they want to increase their profits by producing cheaper goods abroad, and so do their competitors. By doing so, they strengthen the Yuan to the detriment of the dollar. What the Chinese are telling the United States is that they are unwilling to increase the value of the Yuan at the pace that the United States demands. They will not let the US increase their competitiveness while losing value on their holdings of US Treasuries. They are indeed the largest lender to the US Treaury. It is the weakness of the dollar that is the cause of currency disorders, not the disorder of other currencies. The United States has the right to have a currency policy totally driven by its self-interest. What does not work, is when the United States blames others for what is its own irresponsibility. That is plainly dishonest. Adding to that situation, Secretary Tim Geithner at the meeting of the Ministers of Finance presented a “plan” that the Administration should be ashamed of. Not only was it inapplicable, but it exhibited how little this Administration knows about international issues. As the single largest debtor country in the world, a country which depends heavily on foreign lending, the US simply cannot act this way. Geithner’s plan is to limit the balance of payment surplus to a certain percentage of the GDP of each country. The balance of payment deficit/surplus is the difference between exports and imports and currently the US deficit is at least 10%. The surplus of China is above 10%. How can champions of the market economy behave in such a contradictory manner? I suppose it’s easier to blame other countries than to convince US corporations to produce more domestically?! Maybe renouncing some of their bad habits (such as outrageous compensation) will make America competitive?! Or perhaps we should export more and import less? The answers to these questions lie in the United States, not abroad. A weak dollar will make US exports more competitive and imports more expensive. Casting blame on the world for your sins, while committing the most sins of all, is pure hypocrisy! It’s the dollar, stupid.

Read the full article →

Video: Mutascio Says U.S. Banking System Not Facing `Death’

October 26, 2010

Oct. 26 (Bloomberg) — Christopher Mutascio, an analyst with Stifel Nicolaus & Co., and Bloomberg’s Dawn Kopecki discuss the outlook for U.S. banks. They speak with Betty Liu on Bloomberg Television’s “In the Loop.” (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Refinancing Surges Even As Foreclosure Crisis Mounts

October 26, 2010

A rush by U.S. homeowners to refinance at near record-low interest rates marks a rare bright spot for the mortgage industry, under attack for choking the economy with shoddy loans and botched foreclosures.

Read the full article →

Video: Bristol-Myers Profit Beats Estimates; Waksal’s Venture

October 26, 2010

Oct. 26 (Bloomberg) — Bloomberg’s Shannon Pettypiece talks about today’s top health stories, including Bristol-Myers Squibb Co.’s third-quarter profit, which topped analysts’ estimates. She speaks with Betty Liu on Bloomberg Television’s “In The Loop.” (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Video: Home Prices in 20 U.S. Cities Rise Less Than Forecast

October 26, 2010

Oct. 26 (Bloomberg) — Home prices in 20 U.S. cities rose at a slower pace than forecast in August from a year earlier, reflecting slumping sales as the effects of a tax credit waned. The S&P/Case-Shiller index of property values increased 1.7 percent from August 2009, the smallest year-over-year gain since February, the group said today in New York. Bloomberg’s Michael McKee reports. (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Credit Card Offers Still Too Complex To Decipher: Study

October 26, 2010

NEW YORK — It’s becoming a little bit easier for credit card holders to understand the interest rates and penalty charges they face. That’s because regulations that took effect earlier this year are having an impact. But a study released Monday said credit card offers are still far more complicated than a decade ago, which makes it harder for consumers to comparison shop. The greater complexity didn’t arise from a requirement that banks disclose more information to consumers, said Josh Frank, a researcher at the Center for Responsible Lending who authored the study. “It was mainly due to more complexity in terms, more fees, more complex fee structures,” he said in an interview. As a result card offers now regularly include separate listings for balance transfer fees, minimum interest charges, cash advance interest rates, penalty rates and a number of other lines that were added to disclosures in recent years. Those fees existed on some cards for years, but they’ve proliferated so that they’re now nearly universal, said Ben Woolsey, director of marketing and consumer research for CreditCards.com, a consumer website not involved in the study. As more banks adopted these charges, they were added to more disclosures. The study looked at the disclosure boxes on mailed credit card offers from the top 25 issuers since 1999. The average box included 13 numbers related to specific terms or dates in 1999 and peaked at 33 numbers a decade later. Since February, when card regulations kicked in, the average has dipped to 26 numbers. That’s better, but still far more than an individual can process, particularly if trying to compare terms between cards to pick the best one, the study said. And that’s without counting the terms of rewards programs, which are generally not included in disclosure boxes. Consumers who are trying to compare offers can quickly reach information overload if they go point-by-point through different offers, the study said. It noted that some banks and credit unions are able to keep their offers simple by keeping their card terms simple. The American Banking Association said the study came across “as a less than subtle attempt” to get the government to require banks to issue “plain vanilla products,” or cards that carry the simplest terms. That would deny consumers “the benefits of innovation and choice,” the trade group said in an e-mailed response. Woolsey, of CreditCards.com, noted that the language used in credit card offers is really not designed for the people using the cards. The disclosures are “ultimately not for the purpose of consumer understanding, they’re really more for legal protection,” he said. “It becomes legalese, and it’s not highly explanatory.” Online: Center for Responsible Lending, http://www.responsiblelending.org

Read the full article →

Video: Bolton Says AIG Has `Solid Bench’ Behind Benmosche

October 26, 2010

Oct. 26 (Bloomberg) — Robert Bolton, managing director at Mendon Capital Advisors Corp., talks about American International Group Inc. Chief Executive Officer Robert Benmosche, who is battling cancer, and the outlook for the company’s management structure. Bolton speaks with Betty Liu on Bloomberg Television’s “In the Loop.” (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Video: Kushner Says Vostu Is `Laser Beam Focused’ on Brazil

October 26, 2010

Oct. 26 (Bloomberg) — Joshua Kushner, co-founder of Vostu and founder of Thrive Capital, a startup investment fund, discusses the outlook for Vostu and the focus of Thrive Capital. Kushner speaks with Betty Liu on Bloomberg Television’s “In the Loop.” (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Narus Appoints Rod Murchison Senior Vice President of Product Management

October 26, 2010

Veteran Executive Brings More Than 20 Years’ Innovation in Addressing Complex Network and Security Needs

Read the full article →

Prolitec Names Bhandari Director of Business Development

October 26, 2010

MILWAUKEE, WI–(Marketwire – October 26, 2010) –  Prolitec Inc., a leading developer of air treatment and air care technologies, today announced the appointment of Suresh Bhandari, 45, as Director of Business Development.

Read the full article →

Portfolio Recovery Associates Appoints Vice President

October 26, 2010

NORFOLK, VA–(Marketwire – October 26, 2010) –   Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc., ( NASDAQ : PRAA ) a company that purchases and manages portfolios of defaulted consumer receivables and provides a broad range of receivables management and payments processing services, today announced the hiring of Elizabeth Shumadine as vice president, Business Development.

Read the full article →

Former CVS Caremark Executive William Spalding Rejoins King & Spalding

October 26, 2010

ATLANTA, GA–(Marketwire – October 26, 2010) –  King & Spalding announced today that William R. Spalding, a former executive vice president of CVS Caremark, has rejoined the firm as a partner in the corporate practice. He will focus primarily on developing new clients and expanding existing business in the healthcare services, branded pharmaceuticals and healthcare information technology sectors, and providing advice in governance, internal investigations and disclosure matters to corporate boards of directors and audit committees. Spalding also will be active in King & Spalding’s industry initiatives on healthcare and the life sciences (pharmaceuticals, biotechnology and medical devices). 

Read the full article →