March 2011

Economy Grew Faster Than Previously Thought In Fourth Quarter

March 25, 2011

WASHINGTON: The economy grew more quickly than previously estimated in the fourth quarter as businesses maintained fairly solid spending and restocked shelves to meet rising demand, while corporate profits increased 3.3 percent, a government report showed on Friday. Gross domestic product growth was revised up to an annualized rate of 3.1 percent, the Commerce Department said in its final estimate, close to its initial estimate of 3.2 percent published two months ago and up from its tally of 2.8 percent made in February. Economists had expected GDP growth, which measures total goods and services output within U.S. borders, to be revised up to a 3.0 percent pace. The economy expanded at a 2.6 percent rate in the third quarter. For the whole of 2010, the economy grew 2.9 percent, while corporate profits grew 20.4 percent, the most since 2004. Data so far suggest the economy maintained this growth pace in the first quarter, but there are concerns that rising oil prices could crimp consumer spending and slow the economic recovery. The pick-up in growth has been acknowledged by the Federal Reserve, which injected massive amounts of money into the economy to stimulate demand. The U.S. central bank is expected to conclude its $600 billion government bond buying program at the end of June. The government raised fourth-quarter growth estimates to reflect stronger business spending and inventory accumulation than previously forecast. Business investment rose at a 7.7 percent rate instead of 5.3 percent, lifted by spending on equipment and software, as well as on structures. Spending grew at a 10.0 percent pace in the third quarter. Spending on software and equipment increased at a 7.7 percent rate instead of 5.5 percent. Investment in structures rose at a solid 7.6 percent, the first increase since the second quarter of 2008. Business inventories increased $16.2 billion instead of the $7.1 billion estimated last month, subtracting a smaller 3.42 percentage points from GDP growth rather than the previously reported 3.70 percentage points drag. Excluding inventories, the economy expanded at an unrevised 6.7 percent pace, the fastest increase in domestic and foreign demand since 1998. Domestic purchases grew at a 3.2 percent rate instead of 3.1 percent. Consumer spending — which accounts for more than two-thirds of U.S. economic activity — grew at a 4.0 percent rate in the final three months of 2010 instead of 4.1 percent. It was still the fastest since the last three months of 2006 and was an acceleration from the third quarter’s 2.4 percent rate. The growth in exports was not as strong as previously estimated, while imports were revised a touch down. Trade added 3.27 percentage points to GDP growth instead of 3.35 percentage points. Government spending contracted at a 1.7 percent rate rather than 1.5 percent, due to weak state and local government outlays. The GDP report confirmed a pick-up in inflation pressures on surging food and gasoline prices. The personal consumption expenditures (PCE) index rose at a revised 1.7 percent rate in the fourth quarter instead of 1.8 percent. That compared to the third quarter’s 0.8 percent increase. But a “core” price index closely watched by the Fed advanced at a revised 0.4 percent rate instead of 0.5 percent. The increase was the smallest rise on record. (Reporting by Lucia Mutikani, Editing by Andrea Ricci) Copyright 2010 Thomson Reuters. Click for Restrictions .

Read the full article →

Video: Kraemer Says S&P to Reassess Greece, Portugal Amid ESM

March 25, 2011

March 25 (Bloomberg) — Moritz Kraemer, managing director of European sovereign ratings at Standard & Poor’s, discusses the outlook for the sovereign debt ratings of Greece and Portugal once full details of the European Stability Mechanism, the euro area’s permanent rescue fund, are disclosed. Kraemer speaks with Erik Schatzker on Bloomberg Television’s “InsideTrack.” (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Irish Banks Might Need Another Expensive Bailout

March 25, 2011

BRUSSELS – European finance ministers will decide on any necessary changes to Ireland’s bailout programme after the results next week of stress tests on Irish banks, the president of the European Council said on Thursday. Any decision would have to wait, Herman Van Rompuy said after chairing a meeting of EU leaders, who met against a backdrop of mounting concerns that Ireland may need more than the 35 billion euros ($49 billion) set aside under an EU/IMF bailout to prop up its banks. “We need to have those results to evaluate the consequences on the programme,” he told reporters, commenting on stress tests to check the health of Irish banks. “Then we can make a decision as soon as possible at the level of the finance ministers.” The European Central Bank, which is supporting Irish banks by lending them money they would normally borrow from peers, wants to gradually withdraw this, but Irish Prime Minister Enda Kenny is seeking support among EU leaders for more leeway. Earlier this week, Irish Finance Minister Michael Noonan made a similar plea for more flexibility to ECB President Jean-Claude Trichet. Dublin is also worried that pressure from the ECB could force a firesale of bad Irish loans and exacerbate its problems. But with bank stress tests still under way and any preliminary findings under wraps, Kenny was unable to soothe concerns about a larger rescue bill. “I think it’s much more important to be absolutely clear about the extent of the liabilities before we make any further discussions or negotiations,” Kenny said earlier, as he entered the leaders’ meeting. “From that point of view I have agreed that I will come back … when the extent of the stress tests are actually known,” said the Irish prime minister, who had originally hoped to win concessions on the interest rate charged on bailout loans. UNANSWERED QUESTIONS In a draft statement due to be published after the summit, the leaders outline only their ambition to agree on a plan to restructure troubled banks and decide how governments can help them. They are set to leave many questions unanswered, including how Ireland could be helped further if its existing bailout loans are not enough. Nor will they agree on the technicalities of how to increase the lending capacity of the European Financial Stability Facility, the current EU scheme to help countries in financial difficulty. ECB loans outstanding to banks in Ireland hit 117 billion euros ($165 billion) last month, more than a third higher than a year ago. The Irish central bank has also more than quadrupled its lending to the country’s banks, to 70 billion euros, over the same period. The ECB is working on a plan to wean struggling banks in Ireland and elsewhere that remain reliant on its funding. German central bank chief Axel Weber hinted that could be ready by the third quarter of this year. The Irish government also hopes to hand losses to some senior bondholders in Irish banks, a move many both in Brussels and other European capitals fear could prompt a new investor scare. Such a move could affect the more than 11 billion euros of bonds issued by Irish banks AIB and Bank of Ireland. These are not covered by a state guarantee handed out in haste to protect Irish banks, but which saddled the taxpayer with a bill many believe is unmanageable. But many EU countries oppose such a step. “This would be adventurism and reckless policy making,” said one official. Ireland will have the results of its banking sector stress tests by the end of next week, though it is still not clear how high the bar will be for banks to pass these financial health checks. The last round of tests were branded useless after Irish banks were given a clean bill of health — only months before the EU and International Monetary Fund were called to provide a bailout. (Additional reporting by Marc Jones in Frankfurt, editing by Rex Merrifield/Stephen Nisbet/Ruth Pitchford) Copyright 2011 Thomson Reuters. Click for Restrictions .

Read the full article →

Richard Greenwald: Lessons from History

March 25, 2011

One hundred years ago today, America witnessed one of the worst industrial tragedies in its history. New York City’s Triangle Factory, one of the largest garment factories in the country, caught fire killing 146 mostly young, immigrant women. The Triangle Fire was seared into the hearts of New Yorkers and the nation for generations. That tragedy, however, led to a new era of industrial safety regulation that briefly made New York the model for the country. One hundred years later, with a series of high-profile industrial accidents again in the news, its clear that we need to relearn the lessons of this long ago tragedy. March 25, 1911, started as any Saturday for the five hundred or so workers at Triangle: a work day, in a week of long hours, harsh conditions and miserable pay. Triangle occupied a notorious space in an industry know for notorious working conditions, even if it operated out of a modern Greenwich Village loft building. It kept tons of fabric on hand, dozens of 40-gallon oil canisters in stairways and regularly pad-locked exists. In 1909, as 20,000 workers struck over the garment industry’s terrible sweatshop conditions, Triangle resorted to violence to resist workers’ demands of better conditions and improved wages. The fire started on the 8th floor, sparked most likely by a carelessly tossed cigarette. As workers fled, management, on the 10th floor, were notified and escaped to a neighboring building via the roof. No one told the workers on the 9th floor, who were trapped behind locked doors in what can only be described as an inferno. There was little hope, as a crowd watched helpless women jump to their death rather than face the fire. The image of young women leaping to certain death haunted a generation. After the fire, many called it an accident, an act of god — sad but the sort of thing that happens–and answered with charity. But, as Rabbi Stephen Wise said, it is not the act of God but the inaction of man that is responsible. Workers and reformers agreed with Wise. The fire and the tragic deaths were avoidable. Something needed to be done. The fire united workers and reformers throughout the state, who pressured Al Smith and Robert Wagner, Assembly Speaker and Majority Leader of the Senate, into creating the Factory Investigating Committee (FIC), which they co-chaired. During its duration, 1911-1915, they rewrote New York’s labor, building, safety and industrial code creating better working conditions for the states millions of workers, making New York a model for the nation. Rather than turn away from responsibility, that generation met it head on, becoming champions of the common man. But, unfortunately, we have unlearned that important lesson. How many workers need to die before we realize it? Industrial accidents have gained renewed public attention this past year with mine collapses and oil rig explosions in the news. Yet, for all the public outrage, we have failed to learn from the past as we continue to see them as isolated acts of nature, rather than avoidable symptoms of a failed industrial regulation system. We loose sight of the dangers workers face by trivializing these stories as human-interest stories or solely focusing on the environmental impact. How many construction workers need to die before we learn that there is a problem in that industry that could be solved? Thirty plus years of deregulation comes with an all too real human price. We have federal and state agencies that have such little funding that they no longer function. We have so under funded the regulatory system, declawing it through starvation, that it is essentially meaningless. We have rolled back the clock. If we really cared about workers’ safety and health we would provide funding to increase the number of industrial inspectors at both the state and local level so they might find problems and correct them before we have another set of disaster. We have forgotten a lesson learned 100 years ago today, with the Triangle Fire: that the less we regulate, the more likely these events will happen and the more workers needlessly die. It is we who will have to live with the knowledge that we knew and chose to nothing. Triangle teaches us that it is never too late to learn from tragedies, even one that is 100 years old. Have we become desensitized to industrial disasters in our post-industrial age? It is easy for us to turn our backs, as many of our lives are not directly affected when workers die. It is tragic, but life goes on. But, in 1911, our society paused, taking moral stock of itself and did what was right. We need no more victims, because we already have 146. So on this day, in their memory, lets pledge to relearn from history so that no others join them. We wouldn’t need concerts and charities for industrial disasters if we truly learn from the Triangle Fire, because we could prevent them. Richard Greenwald, professor of history and Dean of the graduate school at Drew University in Madison, NJ, is the author of The Triangle Fire, The Protocols of Piece and the Making of Industrial Democracy in Progressive Era New York his new book, to be published by Bloomsbury Press is The Death of 9-5: Permanent Freelancers, Empty Offices and the New Way America Works.

Read the full article →

Video: U.S. GDP Grew 3.1% in Fourth Quarter, Revised From 2.8%

March 25, 2011

March 25 (Bloomberg) — The U.S. economy grew at a 3.1 percent annual rate in the fourth quarter, led by a jump in consumer spending that will be hard to match early in the year as energy prices surge. The revised increase in gross domestic product compares with a 2.8 percent estimate issued last month, figures from the Commerce Department showed today in Washington. Bloomberg’s Michael McKee reports. (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

GE’s U.S. Tax Bill? Zero

March 25, 2011

The company reported worldwide profits of $14.2 billion, and said $5.1 billion of the total came from its operations in the United States. Its American tax bill? None. In fact, G.E. claimed a tax benefit of $3.2 billion.

Read the full article →

Fannie Mae Internally Reported Foreclosure Abuses In 2006

March 25, 2011

Fannie Mae was warned in a 2006 internal report of abuses in the way lenders and their law firms handled foreclosures, The Wall Street Journal reported on Thursday. Fannie Mae (FNMA.OB) and Freddie Mac (FMCC.OB) have both been under investigation since September 2008 for their role in the mortgage crisis. The 2006 report said foreclosure attorneys in Florida had “routinely made” false statements in court in an effort to more quickly process foreclosures, The Wall Street Journal reported. The report said Fannie Mae officials “believe foreclosure counsel are sacrificing accuracy for speed” but did not name any firms, the Journal said. The internal document also raised questions about whether some mortgage servicers or another entity had the legal standing to foreclose, the newspaper said. The Fannie Mae report found no evidence that borrowers were improperly placed in foreclosure, The Wall Street Journal said. “Fannie Mae took the necessary steps to address the specific issues identified by the 2006 report and regularly evaluates and enhances oversight of its retained attorney network,” a spokeswoman for the government-controlled firm told the newspaper. The U.S. Treasury took control of Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae at the height of the financial crisis in September 2008 as losses mounted from mortgages gone bad. (Reporting by JoAnne Allen; Editing by Gary Hill) Copyright 2011 Thomson Reuters. Click for Restrictions .

Read the full article →

Video: Matlack Says Hermes Kin Have Control `For The Moment’

March 25, 2011

March 25 (Bloomberg) — Carol Matlack, a reporter for Bloomberg Businessweek, discusses the fight by Paris luxury house Hermes International SCA to fend off any takeover attempt by Bernard Arnault, head of LVMH Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SA. LVMH now owns a 20 percent stake in Hermes, manufacturer of sumptuous silk scarves and the iconic Birkin and Kelly handbags. Matlack speaks with Deirdre Bolton on Bloomberg Television’s “InsideTrack.” (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Exosphere Aircraft’s Directors Elect Howard Highsmith, a Veteran High Tech Consultant, to the Company’s Board

March 25, 2011

GRANITE FALLS, NC–(Marketwire – March 25, 2011) – Exosphere Aircraft ( PINKSHEETS : EXSA ) dba BCS, Inc., the nationwide leader in networking for the Internet, today reported that its Board of Directors has elected veteran high tech consultant Howard Highsmith as a board member.

Read the full article →

Video: U.S. Troops May ‘See’ Through Walls With Portable Gear

March 25, 2011

March 25 (Bloomberg) — A hand-held device that allows U.S. soldiers to detect enemies through walls or find victims under rubble may go into production as early as September. The Army agreed last year to pay as much as $150.9 million to Waltham, Massachusetts-based Raytheon Co. and New York-based L-3 Communications Holdings Inc. to construct 60 units for field testing. Bloomberg’s Megan Hughes reports. (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Video: Millstein Questions Long-Term Sustainability of Europe Debt

March 25, 2011

March 25 (Bloomberg) — Jim Millstein, former chief restructuring officer at the U.S. Treasury Department, talks about the outlook for the European sovereign debt crisis and the European Stability Mechanism, the euro area’s permanent bailout fund. Millstein speaks with Erik Schatzker on Bloomberg Television’s “InsideTrack.” (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

PacificHealth Laboratories Board Names New Chairman

March 25, 2011

MATAWAN, NJ–(Marketwire – March 25, 2011) –  PacificHealth Laboratories, Inc. ( OTCQB : PHLI ), a nutrition technology company, announced today that the Board of Directors voted to elect Dr. Robert Portman, Company founder, as its Chairman of the Board. Dr. Portman, a well-known sports science researcher and author, developed all of the Company’s sports nutrition products. Since August 2010, Dr. Portman has been working as a consultant for the Company. 

Read the full article →

Video: Southwest’s Kelly Calls Fuel Price `Single Biggest Risk’

March 25, 2011

March 25 (Bloomberg) — Gary Kelly, chief executive officer of Southwest Airlines Co., discusses the carrier’s jet fuel hedging program and fare strategy. Kelly talks with Deirdre Bolton on Bloomberg Television’s “InsideTrack.” (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Fed Official: High Unemployment Isn’t Inevitable After Bubbles Collapse

March 25, 2011

The collapse of an asset bubble will not necessarily lead to higher unemployment as long as monetary policy is loose enough, a top Federal Reserve Bank official said on Friday. But a central bank that has already lowered interest rates to zero may be unable to deliver adequately accommodative policy, and unemployment may rise, Minneapolis Federal Reserve Bank President Narayana Kocherlakota said in prepared remarks for delivery at an academic conference in Marseilles. Kocherlakota touched neither upon the U.S. economic outlook nor current monetary policy in his speech. An unusually strong disclaimer, he said his paper was only meant to explore a new economic model and contains “no information about my own thinking about current policy.” Since December 2008, the U.S. central bank has kept short-term interest rates near zero and has bought about $2 trillion in mortgage- and U.S.-government-backed debt to lower borrowing rates still further. But that has not been enough to bring down persistently high unemployment, which in February registered 8.9 percent. Meanwhile, median U.S. home prices — which soared before the crisis hit — sank to the lowest since December 2003. “The collapse of a bubble need have no impact on the economy, as long as the central bank lowers r* sufficiently,” he wrote, using economists’ shorthand for the real interest rate. “With insufficiently accommodative monetary policy (generated perhaps by the zero lower bound on nominal interest rates), the bubble collapse can lead to increases in unemployment.” In one of the paper’s more surprising claims, Kocherlakota suggested that extending unemployment benefits — sometimes seen as adding to the jobless rate because it can discourage those receiving benefits from actively seeking jobs — actually reduces it. Copyright 2011 Thomson Reuters. Click for Restrictions .

Read the full article →

Video: London Banks Pay Premium for City, Shun Canary Wharf

March 25, 2011

March 25 (Bloomberg) — Bloomberg’s Poppy Trowbridge reports on the competition between Canary Wharf and the City, London’s two financial districts, to attract financial services companies.

Read the full article →

Video: Passera Says Ferrero-Parmalat Union Could Be ‘Enormous’

March 25, 2011

March 25 (Bloomberg) — Intesa Sanpaolo SpA Chief Executive Officer Corrado Passera discusses the possible union between food companies Parmalat SpA and Ferrero SpA. He spoke yesterday with reporters in Rome.

Read the full article →

Video: Watchmakers Reassess Growth Forecasts Amid Global Risks

March 25, 2011

March 25 (Bloomberg) — Bloomberg’s Olivia Sterns reports from the world’s largest watch fair in Basel, Switzerland, on the outlook for growth in the industry.

Read the full article →

Video: Lamba Says RIM’s PlayBook Sales Targets `Tough’ to Meet

March 25, 2011

March 25 (Bloomberg) — Abhey Lamba, managing director at International Strategy & Investment Group, talks about the sales outlook for Research in Motion Ltd.’s PlayBook tablet. RIM, maker of the BlackBerry smartphone, fell as much as 13 percent in late trading yesterday after forecasting first-quarter revenue and profit that missed analysts’ estimates. Lamba speaks with Erik Schatzker on Bloomberg Television’s “InsideTrack.” (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Video: Kraemer Says S&P Concerned With Aspects of ESM Accord

March 25, 2011

March 25 (Bloomberg) — Moritz Kraemer, managing director of European sovereign ratings at Standard & Poor’s, discusses the European Stability Mechanism, the euro area’s permanent bailout fund. Leaders reached an accord Monday and conclude two days of meetings in Brussels today to endorse the package. Already the EU bowed to Germany’s demand to pare the fund’s paid-in capital as of 2013. Kraemer speaks with Erik Schatzker on Bloomberg’s Television “InsideTrack.” (Source: Bloomberg) (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Video: Informa’s Byrne Discusses Research In Motion’s Playbook

March 25, 2011

March 25 (Bloomberg) — Gavin Byrne, a senior analyst at Informa Telecoms and Media, talks about new products entering the tablet market, including Research In Motion Ltd.’s Playbook. He speaks with Maryam Nemazee on Bloomberg Television’s “The Pulse.”

Read the full article →

Video: Van Nieuwenhuijzen Sees Less Debt Contagion in Europe

March 25, 2011

March 25 (Bloomberg) — Valentijn van Nieuwenhuijzen, head of strategy and chief economist at ING Investment Management, talks about the prospects of an international bailout for Portugal and asset allocation. He speaks with Maryam Nemazee on Bloomberg Television’s “The Pulse.”

Read the full article →

Video: Citi’s Parsons Succeeds With His Mastery of the Schmooze

March 25, 2011

March 25 (Bloomberg) — Richard D. Parsons, the 62-year-old chairman of Citigroup Inc., has mastered his people skills and political connections, and they have powered his career to the top of some of America’s most prominent, and troubled, companies, Bloomberg Businessweek reports in its March 28 edition. Erik Schatzker reports in today’s Movers & Shakers. (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Video: IFO’s Sinn Says German Domestic Investment Spurs Growth

March 25, 2011

March 25 (Bloomberg) — Ifo Institute President Hans-Werner Sinn, talks about German business confidence, which fell less than economists expected in March. He speaks with Maryam Nemazee on Bloomberg Television’s “The Pulse.”

Read the full article →

Video: GLC’s Bell Says Portugal Can’t Survive Without Bailout

March 25, 2011

March 25 (Bloomberg) — Stephen Bell, chief economist at GLC Ltd., talks about the prospects for a European Union bailout of Portugal. He speaks with Francine Lacqua on Bloomberg Television’s “On The Move.”

Read the full article →

Video: Moody’s Howlader Says Gulf Banks `Insulated’ From Egypt

March 25, 2011

March 25 (Bloomberg) — Khalid Howlader, senior credit officer at Moody’s Investors Service, talks about the effect of unrest in North Africa on banks in the Middle East. He speaks with Francine Lacqua on Bloomberg Television’s “On The Move.”

Read the full article →

Video: Portugal’s Passos Says New Government Can Restore Trust

March 25, 2011

March 25 (Bloomberg) — Pedro Passos Coelho, the leader of Portugal’s opposition Social Democrats party, talks about the country’s austerity plan and negotiations with the European Union. He spoke with Bloomberg’s David Tweed in Brussels yesterday.

Read the full article →

Video: Portugal Crisis Highlights Euro-Zone Economic Divisions

March 25, 2011

March 25 (Bloomberg) — Bloomberg’s Nicole Itano reports from Lisbon on the political and economic crisis in Portugal following the resignation of Prime Minister Jose Socrates.

Read the full article →

Video: Forrester Says European Debt Contagion Has Decreased

March 25, 2011

March 25 (Bloomberg) — David Forrester, a Singapore-based currency economist at Barclays Capital, discusses the outlook for the euro and the risk of contagion from the debt crisis in Portugal. He talks with Linzie Janis on Bloomberg Television’s “Global Connection.”

Read the full article →

Leahy Presses Obama To Name Key Reformer To Swaps Panel

March 25, 2011

WASHINGTON — Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) is lobbying President Obama to appoint Sean Cota, a Vermont business owner and an advocate of the regulation of the derivatives trade, to an open seat on the powerful Commodity Futures Trading Commission. Leahy sent a letter to the president on Wednesday backing Cota’s appointment. Leahy’s pick for the panel runs Cota & Cota, a longtime family-owned home heating company based in Vermont. Cota was active in the Commodity Markets Oversight Coalition, an alliance of small businesses, consumer advocates and other “end users” of derivatives. Cota was a fixture on the Hill during Wall Street reform, articulating opposition to dark derivatives markets and serving as a counter balance to industry lobbyists who insisted that regulating derivatives and clearing them in the open on an exchange would increase the cost of hedging risk. He was part of a powerful coalition of unlikely allies who lobbied to bring derivatives trading into the sun. He’s a past chairman of the New England Fuel Institute, which lobbied on behalf of reform. Leahy is a senior member of the Senate Agriculture Committee, which has jurisdiction over CFTC nominations – a relic of the days when commodity futures were used primarily by farmers to hedge pricing risk. Some small businesses still rely on derivatives to hedge against the risk of inflation or price swings, but because most derivatives aren’t traded on exchanges similar to the stock market, small end users of swaps have little way of knowing whether they’re paying a fair price or getting gouged on fees. Leahy, a Democrat from Vermont, is also chairman of the Judiciary Committee, a powerful spot and one that controls the flow of judicial nominations that the administration wants confirmed. A White House that wants its judges confirmed can resist only a small number of entreaties from the panel’s chairman. Were Cota to be nominated, he’d face an uphill climb in a Senate that is approaching stalemate on confirmations, as Democrats lack the 60 votes needed to overcome a filibuster. The CFTC is currently led by Gary Gensler, who was initially greeted by liberal Democrats with great suspicion for his role in pushing deregulation in the 1990s and his long stint at Goldman Sachs. He has since had an ideological conversion, putting him firmly on the pro-regulatory side, and counts among his allies some of his former opponents. Cota and Gensler hold many of the same positions, but the two arrived at them by starkly divergent paths. Gensler was shocked out of his deregulatory mindset when the dark derivatives market nearly brought down the global economy. Cota, meanwhile, watched fuel prices in Vermont fluctuate over the years while the cost of hedging continued to climb. “Sean has years of experience working with me and other members of Congress on financial reform efforts,” Leahy wrote in the letter to the president, which was obtained by HuffPost. “An early voice warning of manipulation and fraud needlessly driving up the cost of energy to American consumers, Sean has testified before Congress and the CFTC nine times on commodity markets and financial derivatives. His knowledge was integral in the drafting of key commodity, swap, and derivative provisions of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act.” Spokespersons for Leahy and the White House weren’t immediately available.

Read the full article →

Ian Fletcher: A Review of Ha-Joon Chang’s 23 Things They Don’t Tell You About Capitalism

March 25, 2011

If you’re not happy with the way the U.S. economy is being run right now, you’ve been pretty much stuck talking to leftists to get any serious in-depth dissidence. With the exception of a few distinguished rightist critics like Paul Craig Roberts, a former Reagan appointee at the Treasury Department, most people who do hard-hitting across-the-board criticism of our present variety of capitalism are liberals and beyond. So if pink isn’t your political color, you’re pretty much stuck with narrow-bore criticism of the recent financial crisis–most of which comes down to “people were stupid and crooked.” Thus it is with great pleasure that I review Ha-Joon Chang’s new book 23 Things They Don’t Tell You About Capitalism . This is one of the toughest assaults on what passes for capitalism in the U.S. these days to come out in decades–but it is not especially a liberal or leftist book, and thus supplies the profound need America has for economic criticism that is both radical and bipartisan. There’s plenty here to offend both Republicans (Americans have no intrinsic right to be rich) and Democrats (immigration makes local workers poorer), but plenty to delight both, insofar as they are looking for real answers. This is a theoretically profound book, but emphatically not a book for theorists. It is thus a book for anyone who has grasped that America is being strangled by a set of myths about what capitalism is and how it works. Debunking these myths is thus job one. Ha-Joon Chang is a South Korean economist currently teaching at Cambridge University in England. His academic specialty up to now has been protectionism and state industrial policy, i.e. two things that conventional economics says can’t work. But his own native land is visible proof that they can. And this is just his starting point for exposing the flaws in conventional economic wisdom. Because Chang is so spot-on with most of what he has to say, I shall keep my commentary to a minimum and just reel off his insights in order. To wit: Thing 1: There is no such thing as a free market . Pace the glorification of the free market in recent years, this is largely a mythical animal. This is not just because of government interference, it is often because the private sector doesn’t want to be free, regardless of what it says. Even when we could hypothetically free up markets, we frequently wouldn’t be better off it we did. Thing 2: Companies should not be run in the interest of their owners . Not entirely, that is. Even the former king of “shareholder value” himself, ex-GE CEO Jack Welch, has recently conceded this. Long-term success requires taking seriously everyone who contributes to a business: not just equity investors but also employees, suppliers, customers, and plant communities. Thing 3: Most people in rich countries are paid more than they should be . Neither you nor I did anything to deserve to be born in this country–or after the invention of antibiotics, for that matter. This doesn’t mean we should feel guilty; it does mean we should remember we succeed in large part because of what society we belong to, not just due to our own efforts. Thing 4: The washing machine has changed the world more than the Internet . The washing machine and other labor-saving devices made feasible the radical change in women’s roles we know as feminism. Similarly, without the humble air conditioner, America would have no Sunbelt. Twitter doesn’t come close. Thing 5: Assume the worst about people and you will get the worst . Yes, people’s behavior is maybe 70 percent self-interested. But the remaining 30 percent is a big chunk, and you can’t make sense of even a capitalist economy without taking it seriously. Companies (and countries!) that understand this do better than those that try to run on selfishness alone. Thing 6: Greater macroeconomic stability has not made the world economy more stable . Brutal anti-inflationary policies can easily do more damage than the inflation they combat. Protecting the value of a nation’s money is less important that protecting its economy as a whole. We’ve had more financial crises the more obsessed with hard money we’ve become. Thing 7: Free-market policies rarely make poor countries rich . As I discussed in Chapter Six of my own book, every developed nation from England down to the present day got that way through protectionism and state industrial policy, not pure free markets. Even the good ol’ USA played this game from Independence until after WWII. Thing 8: Capital has a nationality . Capital mobility causes plenty of mischief in our overly globalized world, but it’s a myth that capital has been denationalized into free-floating ether. Money always belongs to somebody, and those somebodies have passports and home addresses. It matters who’s in charge, and the answer is never “nobody.” Thing 9: We do not live in a post-industrial age . The myth that we do has just led to the neglect of U.S. manufacturing while Japan and Germany remain quite competitive in hard industries despite paying decent wages. You can’t download a ride to work or the supermarket. Thing 10: The U.S. does not have the highest standard of living in the world . Much bad policy, both here and abroad, has been based on the idea that the American version of capitalism is observably superior. But our per-hour average income ranks about 8th in the world on a purchasing-power parity (read the book to find out what that is) basis. Thing 11: Africa is not destined for underdevelopment . Africans aren’t poor because of any mysterious or immutable factors. In the 1960s and 1970s, they were making progress. They’re poor for the same reasons other nations were once poor–which means that their poverty can be fixed if the apply the same solutions other nations have. Thing 12: Governments can pick winners . Not every time, and don’t get careless, but the free market isn’t always right, and the government isn’t always wrong. In the U.S., government was responsible for (in order) the Erie Canal, the Transcontinental Railroad, the Interstate Highway System, and the Internet. Not to mention the aircraft and semiconductor industries. In East Asia, governments did even more. Thing 13: Making rich people richer doesn’t make the rest of us richer . Trickle down economics doesn’t work because wealth doesn’t trickle down. It trickles up , which is why the rich are the rich in the first place. Thing 14: U.S. managers are overpriced . America has the highest-paid corporate managers in the world. We don’t have the best-performing industries. Are we getting our money’s worth? You do the math. Thing 15: People in poor countries are more entrepreneurial than people in rich countries . Yup: they open up fruit stands at the drop of a hat. This doesn’t stop them from being poor, so stop telling them they need to be more “entrepreneurial.” Their problems lie elsewhere. Thing 16: We are not smart enough to leave things to the market. In the real world, markets don’t take care of themselves. They need to be regulated. How much and in what way is legitimate party politics, but an unregulated economy is a dangerous fantasy. Thing 17: More education in itself is not going to make a country richer . You need not just education, but industries for educated people to work in. And paper-pushing education isn’t necessarily the kind of education you need–something America forgets with its neglect of serious vocational training. Again, ask Germany and Japan. Thing 18: What is good for General Motors is not necessarily good for the United States . There was (maybe) once a time when the interests of giant corporations were reasonably closely aligned with the interests of the national economies they reside in. That time is long gone. Multinationals will treat nations as hotels if we let them. Thing 19: Despite the fall of communism, we are still living in planned economies . Capitalist planned economies, that is–only nobody calls it that when we get the results that happy suburban consumers like ourselves want. The very fact that people are whining to Washington to solve our economic problems reveals how important planning is in this country. Thing 20: Equality of opportunity may be not be fair . A “get what you deserve” society sounds good, and in many ways it is, but there need to be some minimums for what even the losers get. Thing 21: Big government makes people more open to change . Because it makes them more able to take risks. Some economies with big welfare states do very well, thank you. It all depends on what kind of big government you have. If big government is always a loser, why is America borrowing money from Sweden ? Thing 22: Financial markets need to become less, not more, efficient . Efficiency in financial markets isn’t the same thing as efficiency in other industries. It can easily just mean “efficiently sinking into debt.” Even we Americans understood this from about 1930 to 1980; time to relearn it. Thing 23: Good economic policy does not require good economists . Most of the really important economic issues, the ones that decide whether nations sink or swim, are within the intellectual reach of intelligent non-economists. Technical Economics with a capital “E” has remarkably little to say about the things that really matter. Concerned citizens need to stop being intimidated by the experts here. On this last score, reading Dr. Chang’s book would be a good place to start.

Read the full article →

Video: Investor Maples Looks for `Thunder Lizard’ Startups

March 25, 2011

March 24 (Bloomberg) — Mike Maples, managing partner at Floodgate, talks about his investment strategy, the outlook for Twitter Inc. and the valuation of technology companies. He speaks with Cory Johnson and Emily Chang on Bloomberg Television’s “Bloomberg West.” (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Video: Analyst Sutherland Watching RIM PlayBook `Staying Power’

March 25, 2011

March 24 (Bloomberg) — Scott Sutherland, managing director of research at Wedbush Securities Inc., talks about the outlook for Research In Motion Ltd. RIM fell in late trading after forecasting first-quarter revenue and profit that missed analysts’ estimates. Sutherland speaks with Emily Chang and Cory Johnson on Bloomberg Television’s “Bloomberg West.” (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

CoStar’s People of Note (March 20-26)

March 25, 2011

This week’s People of Note includes the following markets: Atlanta, Boston, Dallas, East Bay, Long Island, Los Angeles, New York City, Philadelphia, San Francisco and South Bay. LOS ANGELES Lee & Associates Taps Toumazos as Principal Commercial real estate veteran Paulette Toumazos joined Lee & Associates-LA North/Ventura Inc. in Sherman Oaks, CA, as a principal. The 25-year industry professional focuses on the sale and leasing of office…

Read the full article →

CoStar’s People of Note (March 20-26)

March 25, 2011

This week’s People of Note includes the following markets: Atlanta, Boston, Dallas, East Bay, Long Island, Los Angeles, New York City, Philadelphia, San Francisco and South Bay. LOS ANGELES Lee & Associates Taps Toumazos as Principal Commercial real estate veteran Paulette Toumazos joined Lee & Associates-LA North/Ventura Inc. in Sherman Oaks, CA, as a principal. The 25-year industry professional focuses on the sale and leasing of office…

Read the full article →

Video: Rampolla Says Coconut Water Is Alternative to Gatorade

March 25, 2011

March 24 (Bloomberg) — Mark Rampolla, chief executive officer of Zico Beverages LLC, talks about the company’s Zico Pure Premium Cocunut water, its relationship with Coca-Cola Co. and Zico spokesperson Boston Celtics forward Kevin Garnett. Rampolla speaks with Bloomberg’s Pimm Fox on Bloomberg Television’s “Taking Stock.” (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Nicholas Carroll: Shifting the Focus From "Strategic Default" to "Prudent Walkaway"

March 25, 2011

A “strategic default” currently means walking away from an underwater home even though the owner could afford to pay the mortgage. However, this represents far less than half of walkaways. The vast majority of foreclosures happen to people who cannot afford to pay the mortgage. Portrayals of strategic default in 2009 were typically of homeowners who “used their home as an ATM,” or “deadbeats.” Even news stories describing the positive side of default didn’t entirely shake those images. One of the earliest semi-positive stories was in the Wall St. Journal , titled ” American Dream 2: Default, Then Rent .” This article described a couple who had defaulted, cut their housing costs from nearly $4,000/month to just over $2,000/month, and were living in a bigger house with “a swimming pool with three waterfalls.” Another strategic defaulter in the same article found the benefits of default-and-rent included the discretionary income to go out to dinner more often, and hang on to his series-6 BMW. These are not the people I meet in the course of interviewing and writing about surviving tough times. The people I meet are laid off, or from two incomes down to one, or on their way to medical bankruptcy. They cannot imagine a swimming pool, much less a waterfall — they just have bills they can’t pay, one of which is the mortgage. Some are slow in adjusting to the “new normal,” and still eat out regularly, but others have already cut back to eating out four times a year. Their home may be underwater — or they may have equity. Often it doesn’t matter, when the bottom line is that they have to choose between the mortgage and medical insurance — because losing medical insurance in America is potentially lethal. For this group, it is not a matter of cunningly defaulting to maintain a latte-sipping lifestyle. It is a matter of prudently walking away from the mortgage that is dragging their family and future under the waves. The benefit for people who act both prudently and decisively can be startling. Taking a fairly typical example from people I’ve interviewed, this is the family’s financial situation: Primary income of $3,000 net per month is gone, with one laid off. Secondary income of $2,000 net is still coming in. $40,000 in cash and savings, including the 401K. $20,000 in credit card debt. One car fully paid for. Second car — $10,000 owed. They have done a careful financial projection. The total monthly expenses are $5,000, right down to the last dime — which includes $2,500/month on mortgage and credit card bills. That says that if the main breadwinner is not fully employed in 14 months, they will lose the home — and of course take a dip in their credit rating. And if the job doesn’t come until the 13th month, it had better be at the same salary as the previous job, or they’ll lose the home anyway. Scenario A: Betting on a job, and continuing to pay the mortgage (a.k.a. “doing the right thing,” according to the moralists). They guess that they will be fully employed again in time to save the home. They continue paying mortgage, car payments, and minimum monthly credit card payments. If their bet is wrong, their trajectory is shown by the red line below. Scenario B: Prudently walking away . They decide that getting a job might require a career shift or relocation, with some time and money invested in re-education. They immediately stop paying the mortgage and credit card payments. In this scenario, they cut their expenses by $2,500/month (which rises to $3,500/month when they move out and start paying rent). If there is real equity in their financed car, they sell it and buy a used car to replace it. Worksheet online in MS Excel format or PDF The difference between A and B is incredible. If the family bets the primary bread-winner will be working within the year and is wrong, they could be leaving their home without enough money to rent a decent apartment in 14 months — exhausted, frightened, and possibly running on bald tires. (People who “do the right thing” tend to leave long before they actually get legal notice to move.) The family that bets the primary bread-winner will not find a job in 13 months and stops paying the debts will be leaving their home with $33,000 cash in hand, move to a rental (usually in the same school district, if need be), and will have three years for the primary bread-winner to find a job . And that’s their worst scenario — it’s quite likely they’ll be in the house for 18-24 months without making any mortgage payments. Conclusion: when the writing is on the wall, the best plan is often a prudent walkaway — an escape to the future, equipped with enough cash to get there.

Read the full article →

Indiana Prosecutor Suggested Scott Walker Fake Attack On Himself To Discredit Unions

March 25, 2011

INDIANAPOLIS — An Indiana prosecutor said one of his deputies resigned Thursday after admitting he sent an email to Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker suggesting the Republican fake an attack on himself to discredit the public employee unions protesting his plan to strip them of nearly all collective bargaining rights. Johnson County Prosecutor Brad Cooper said Carlos Lam resigned in a phone call about 5 a.m. Thursday after acknowledging that he sent the Feb. 19 email to Walker suggesting “the situation in WI presents a good opportunity for what’s called a ‘false flag’ operation.” “If you could employ an associate who pretends to be sympathetic to the unions’ cause to physically attack you (or even use a firearm against you), you could discredit the public unions,” Lam wrote in the email, which was obtained by The Associated Press. Cooper said Lam initially denied sending the email and said someone had hacked into his email account. But Lam later acknowledged he had written the message, and resigned hours before the Wisconsin Center for Investigative Journalism reported the contents publicly Thursday. “He wanted to come clean, I guess, and said he is the one who sent that email,” Cooper told the Daily Journal newspaper in Franklin, south of Indianapolis. A message left by the AP at a telephone listing for Lam was not immediately returned Thursday. Lam’s email was sent amid daily protests at the Wisconsin Capitol against Walker’s plan to take away public employees’ rights to collectively bargain for anything except wages no higher than inflation. “We cannot have the public unions hold the taxpayer hostage with their outrageous demands,” said the email, which urged Walker to “stay strong.” Lam is the second Indiana prosecutor to lose his job over volatile comments about the Wisconsin protests. Jeffrey Cox, a deputy attorney general, was fired last month after tweeting that police should use live ammunition against labor protesters. Wisconsin Republicans eventually used a procedural maneuver to pass the collective bargaining measure without Democrats who had fled to block a vote and Walker has signed it in to law. But a judge has issued a temporary restraining order to block the law from taking effect while courts consider a lawsuit alleging the Republicans’ move violated the state’s open meetings law and constitution.

Read the full article →

Eric J. Weiner: Gaddafi’s Long Reach

March 25, 2011

Regardless of how the Libyan revolt plays out, in the global economy the humanitarian crisis is just one deadly aspect of the fighting. Thousands have been killed and the fabric of society has been shredded in what has become a civil war. But to the nations of Europe that have come to rely on a steady flow of oil and petrodollars from Moammar Gaddafi’s nation, the destruction of what could be called Libya Inc. is likely to be the most painful blow. When the United Nations lifted sanctions on Libya in 2003, after Gaddafi’s regime accepted responsibility for the bombing of a Pan Am jet over Lockerbie, Scotland, many European countries rushed to do business with Gaddafi, despite his erratic history. Why? Because Libya was sitting on a deep, largely untapped reservoir of oil and a mountain of cash. It has more than 40 billion barrels of proven petroleum reserves , ninth most in the world, and its central bank holds $110 billion in foreign exchange reserves while its sovereign wealth fund, the Libyan Investment Authority, has $70 billion more to invest. Seeing the opportunity, Europe pounced. As a result, today just about all of Libya’s major trading partners are European. Take Italy, for example. Italy is by far Libya’s most active business partner, with more than $12 billion in two-way trade annually . Libya supplies almost a quarter of Italy’s oil, and Italy is the world’s largest importer of Libyan crude. Libya also owns 7.5% of the Italian bank UniCredit and has investments in Fiat, the defense conglomerate Finmeccanica, the energy company ENI, the soccer team Juventus and a variety of other Italian businesses. This financial backing helped Italy stave off the most damaging effects of the global recession that started in 2008. In response to international pressure, Italy has frozen some Libyan assets, but none belonging to the country’s central bank or the Libyan Investment Authority. However, Italy’s hardly the only cash-strapped European nation to forge significant economic ties with the Gaddafi regime. In 2009, the European Union’s two-way trading with Libya amounted to more than $37 billion , with Germany, France and Spain among its leading partners. Naturally, the bulk of this was petroleum because Libya supplies more than 10% of Europe’s oil. For a sense of just how much that is, consider that the United States, which had just $2.6 billion in two-way trade with Libya in 2009 and imports virtually no petroleum from the country, gets roughly 10% of its oil from Saudi Arabia. That’s what Europe is losing as Libya burns. In many ways, the nation with the most at stake economically is Britain. Although its annual trade with Libya amounts to less than $2.5 billion , Britain has recently emerged as a major target for Libyan investments. Libya has spent hundreds of millions of dollars on prime London commercial real estate. And last year, a senior executive with the Libyan Investment Authority announced that the fund had earmarked $8 billion exclusively for Britain . This pledge was welcome news for the British government, which has been trying to sell more than $40 billion in state-owned property to help address its yawning budget deficit. In short, it needs the money. Libya’s fascination with Britain stems from Gaddafi’s second-oldest son and presumed political heir, 38-year-old Saif al-Islam, who earned a doctorate from the London School of Economics, owns a $16-million mansion in London’s fashionable Hampstead Garden neighborhood and even opened the Libyan Investment Authority’s first foreign office in London. Over the years, the erudite younger Gaddafi charmed his way into British society, befriending Prince Andrew and visiting Buckingham Palace and Windsor Castle. Of course, now that he’s become a full-throated defender of his father’s savagery, Saif’s erstwhile friends are rushing to distance themselves. The London School of Economics, which has come under heavy criticism for accepting a $2.4-million donation from a Gaddafi charity, is looking into accusations that he plagiarized parts of his doctoral thesis. And his abandoned London home has been occupied by anti-Gaddafi protesters from throughout Britain. But none of these reprisals changes the cold reality that with Libya descending into chaos, Europe is losing a major partner just when its key economies are struggling to regain their footing. Though the timing may be terrible, the outcome shouldn’t be surprising. Europe’s leaders chose to look past the mercurial Gaddafi’s violent past, seeing only Libya’s fortune. And in a matter of weeks, Gaddafi has destroyed everything. As populist movements spread from North Africa to the Arabian Peninsula, where protests have erupted in Bahrain and Yemen, the U.S. will probably face similar issues over its troubling economic alliances, particularly with Saudi Arabia. So U.S. leaders would be wise to pay close attention to what happens with Libya and Europe. An entire continent is wondering: If not the Gaddafis, then who? And it probably won’t be long before America is asking the same questions about its friends as well. Originally published in the Los Angeles Times .

Read the full article →

Direxion Floats Three Bond Index ETFs

March 25, 2011

Direxion is launching three new bond index exchangetraded funds

Read the full article →

Video: Moffett Says Stock Market `Desensitized’ by World Events

March 24, 2011

March 24 (Bloomberg) — James Moffett, a fund manager at Scout Investment Advisors, talks about the performance of the U.S. stock market and his investment strategy for global stocks. Moffett speaks with Pimm Fox and Julie Hyman on Bloomberg Television’s “Taking Stock.” (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

RIM Slumps On BlackBerry Revenue Miss

March 24, 2011

NEW YORK — Research in Motion Ltd.’s stock took a hit Thursday after the maker of the BlackBerry reported revenue from its latest quarter that fell short of expectations and warned that sales in the current three-month period are shifting to cheaper models. RIM’s shares were down $6.59, or more than 10 percent, at $57.50 in extended trading after the Waterloo, Ontario, company reported results from the three months that ended Feb. 26. It posted net income of $934 million, or $1.78 per share, for its fiscal fourth quarter. That was up 31 percent from $710 million, or $1.27 per share, a year earlier. Analysts surveyed by FactSet expected earnings of $1.75 per share, on average. Revenue rose 36 percent to $5.6 billion, shy of the $5.65 billion expected by analysts. For the current quarter, ending in May, RIM said it expects earnings of $1.47 to $1.55 per share, below the average analyst forecast at $1.65. It said that was because cheaper phones would make up more of its sales in the quarter, and it’s spending more on research, development, sales and marketing, especially on its new tablet, the PlayBook. “These are investments in the future,” RIM co-CEO Jim Balsillie told investors on a conference call. The decline in earnings isn’t a trend, he said. The PlayBook and new “superphones” that use the same underlying software as the tablet will keep growth going, he said. “I have many corporate clients that have approached us about, you know, each wanting tens of thousands, several tens of thousands of PlayBooks,” Balsillie said. The PlayBook goes on a sale in the U.S. on April 19. It’s half the size of Apple Inc.’s iPad, and it’s designed to work both as a standalone tablet and as an accessory for a BlackBerry phone. RIM said Thursday that the PlayBook will be able to run applications written for Google Inc.’s Android software. RIM expects earnings for the entire fiscal year of $7.50 per share, well above the analyst forecast at $6.82. The growth of BlackBerry sales has slowed in North America due to competition from the iPhone and phones running Android. But overseas, sales are taking off, as corporations are only starting to put BlackBerrys in the hands of employees. Sales outside the old core markets of U.S., Britain and Canada are now 52 percent of the total, the company said. Cheaper models make up more of the overseas sales, analysts say. Balsillie also said the company is selling more of its cheaper phones because more BlackBerrys are sold without contracts. Such phones aren’t subsidized as much by the wireless carriers, so they’re usually cheaper, entry-level models.

Read the full article →

Video: Adnani Says U.S. Is Highly Reliant on Foreign Uranium

March 24, 2011

March 24 (Bloomberg) — Amir Adnani, chief executive officer of Uranium Energy Corp., talks about the company’s history, financing, uranium processing methods and outlook for sales. He talks with Pimm Fox on Bloomberg Television’s “Taking Stock.” (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Could Walker’s Proposed Schools Budget Cuts Backfire With GOP Voters?

March 24, 2011

BROOKFIELD, Wis. — Barb Feest wishes she could take back her vote for Wisconsin governor. The suburban Milwaukee woman cast her ballot for Republican Scott Walker in November. But she could only shake her head recently as she listened at a public forum to how Walker’s proposed budget cuts could affect schools. “He’s trying to balance the budget on the backs of teachers,” Feest said. “It took so long to get our schools where they are, and they’re going to cut it down in, what, two years? It’s not right.” Almost five months after the election, Feest and some other Republican voters are having doubts about their choices at the ballot box. Although they consider themselves fiscal conservatives, many of the same people who put Walker and other GOP leaders into office are now having second thoughts, largely because the cuts they are seeking could put the quality of their cherished local schools at risk. To ease a projected $3.6 billion budget deficit, Walker has sought to eliminate collective-bargaining rights for most public employees, including teachers – a move that has stirred an intense national debate about union rights and drawn tens of thousands of protesters to the Capitol. But that’s not Walker’s only school-related proposal. His two-year spending plan includes an 8 percent cut in aid to schools – about $835 million. And he wants to require districts to reduce their property-tax authority by an average of $550 per pupil – a move that makes it more difficult for schools to compensate for the lost money. The forum drew about 100 people, and about half, including Feest, came to find out how bad the cuts would be and express their support for teachers. The others who spoke supported Walker’s proposals, and some even suggested the governor seek more teacher concessions such as raising the minimum retirement age above 55. High school math teacher Ronn Blaha, 41, said he felt like a “punch-drunk boxer,” taking one hit after another from the community because Walker had completely vilified the entire teaching profession. “I voted for him because I wanted some restraint on frivolous spending,” Blaha told The Associated Press, adding that he now regrets his vote. “I did not anticipate that he considered education a frivolity.” Walker isn’t the only governor proposing education cuts. Under the budget offered by Ohio Gov. John Kasich, state aid to K-12 schools would actually increase, but overall funding would drop because of allocation changes and loss of stimulus dollars. Individual districts will learn more in days to come. Even longtime Republican voters are worried about the consequences of education cuts. And some are asking whether the quest for a balanced budget justifies gutting top schools that took decades to create. “It all concerns me,” said Donna Leslie, a West Chester, Ohio, mother whose youngest child is a senior in high school. “There are cuts that need to be made, but I don’t think we’re going about it in the right way.” She declined to say whether she voted for Kasich but said she supported a proposal on the same ballot to levy a tax for the Lakota school district in the southwestern corner of the state. She says the tax was voted down because “the tea party was just raging.” Some acknowledge that classroom cuts are inevitable, and many of them are looking for alternatives to expose their children to music and art. Others are confident that school officials will find ways to absorb the cuts without letting education suffer. Leslie expects school funding to continue declining and anti-tax attitudes to make it more difficult to pass school-related tax increases. To be sure, some Republicans say their governors are doing exactly what they were elected to do. Jane Peavler, co-chairwoman of the Brookfield district’s Parent Leadership Council, voted for Walker in November and continues to support him. In an email to the AP, she said the governor showed “great courage” in proposing his budget, and said she was confident that schools would find ways to adapt without letting education suffer. In Mason, Ohio, John Meyer has been an active critic of school administrators. He thinks schools can cut costs without hurting the quality of education. “There’s that great concern and fear, that if we don’t pay these exorbitant salaries, somewhere it’s going to affect our children’s education. I don’t believe that’s necessarily true,” said Meyer, whose two children attended local schools and are now in college. He said school employee benefits and the regular pay raises that administrators and teachers with extra education receive are beyond what can be afforded in the district of nearly 11,000 students. Wisconsin’s cuts affect every district, including wealthy Waukesha County’s Elmbrook schools, which face a $4.2 million budget shortfall in part because of declining enrollments and a hampered ability to raise money through property taxes. To compensate, the district may have to lay off some teachers and ask the remaining ones to teach an additional class period, Superintendent Matt Gibson said. It may also have to cut art and music classes, and average class sizes might creep upward, he added. Those outcomes are acceptable to Andrea Boll, who has three kids in the Elmbrook district. The 51-year-old said as long as the core curriculum in subjects such as math and science remained strong, parents could help pay extra for extra-curricular sports and music programs. However, some parents said severe budget cuts could have long-term effects that are impossible to predict. Andy Vrakas, 47, who has children in the fourth and sixth grades, said good schools do more than help students – they also raise property values and attract employers who know employees will be willing to relocate to those areas. Vrakas, an independent who has voted for Republican governors in the past but not for Walker, said he might even home-school his kids if certain programs get cut or scaled back. “Long-term, if test scores decline and the reputation declines, people might be sorry,” he said. ___ Sewell reported from West Chester, Ohio. ___ Dinesh Ramde can be reached at dramde(at)ap.org.

Read the full article →

Video: Fortuno Says Puerto Rico Will Fix Pensions in 8-10 Years

March 24, 2011

March 24 (Bloomberg) — Puerto Rico Governor Luis Fortuno, a Republican, talks about the U.S. territory’s fiscal policy. He speaks with Adam Johnson and Pimm Fox from the Strategas Global Macro Conference on Bloomberg Television’s “Taking Stock.” (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Video: Thorning Discusses U.S. Subsidies of Electric Cars

March 24, 2011

March 24 (Bloomberg) — Margo Thorning chief economist at the American Council for Capital Formation, talks about U.S. subsidies for electric-powered automobiles. She speaks with Matt Miller and Carol Massar on Bloomberg Television’s “Street Smart.” (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

ValueSelling Associates Names New Associate in India

March 24, 2011

RANCHO SANTA FE, CA–(Marketwire – March 24, 2011) – ValueSelling Associates, creator of the ValueSelling Framework®, has added a new associate to the team. Bhawani Srivastava, a certified facilitator of the ValueSelling instructor-led training program, will develop new business opportunities for ValueSelling in India.

Read the full article →

Video: Saluzzi Doubtful U.S. Firms Can Pass Along Higher Costs

March 24, 2011

March 24 (Bloomberg) — Joseph Saluzzi, co-head of equity trading at Themis Trading LLC, and John Brady, senior vice president at MF Global Inc., talk about the outlook for stocks, corporate earnings and the U.S. economy. They speak with Carol Massar, Matt Miller and Julie Hyman on Bloomberg Television’s “Taking Stock.” (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Julian Block: Filing-Time Fantasies

March 24, 2011

Most myths are fairly short lived. Some, though, just refuse to die. Take, for example, the one that makes the rounds every filing season about how to lessen the likelihood of an audit. According to that fable, the IRS programs its computers to go after late filers, not early filers. Why does the IRS pay less attention to early returns? Supposedly, the agency expects people whose 1040s can’t stand a close look to delay submission of their forms until the last minute. The companion myth is to go the reverse route. The computers are less likely to kick out the 1040s of late filers because the feds are overwhelmed with all kind of returns around April 15. Actually, says the IRS, and knowledgeable tax professionals agree, it makes absolutely no difference whether returns reach the agency early, in between or barely make the due date. That’s because it’s not until much later in the year that all returns go through computers that look them over for arithmetic errors and also single out those most ripe for audit on the basis of top-secret computations that assign scores to various items–charitable contributions and interest expenses, for instance. High-scoring returns, along with some chosen purely at random, are then closely scrutinized by IRS agents to determine which ones should actually be examined. The odds against any return being audited are reassuringly long–better than 100 to one. Put another way, the IRS examines about one percent of all individual returns. That said, it should come as no surprise that those odds can shorten considerably, depending on such factors as the amount and type of income you declare and what you do for a living. Overall odds may not mean that much anyway. Some years, the tax enforcers zero in certain occupations–doctors, dentists, attorneys and accountants, to cite several of the high-visibility groups that are routinely favored for audits. Why is that? Because, among other reasons, these folks file returns that show high incomes, hefty personal deductions in relation to their incomes, and sizable gray-area write-offs for business, as well as losses on investments in questionable tax shelters or in sideline ventures that turn out to be “hobbies,” defined by the IRS as activities pursued without expectations of profits. Hobbyists in IRS cross hairs include persons who offset their full-time salaries and other sources of income with losses they incurred in breeding horses or dogs, collecting and selling coins and stamps, or painting, photography and writing, to note just a few of the many possibilities. But hobby expenses are allowable only up to the extent of hobby income. Moreover, as the IRS learned long ago, many professionals are persistently poor record keepers who are unable to substantiate their spending for business expenditures, mainly because of the strict record-keeping requirements for entertainment and travel expenses. HOW NOT TO DO BATTLE WITH THE IRS . An Illinois taxpayer charged the IRS with violating his civil rights by picking his return for audit, thereby requiring more supporting data from him than from the millions who escaped examination. The Tax Court was cold to his complaint. Then there was Dean M. Hicks, a Costa Mesa, Calif., engineer. Dean was successfully prosecuted by the feds on charges that he fired 13 mortar shells at an IRS Service Center in Fresno, and placed a truck bomb–discovered before it exploded–at the agency’s West Los Angeles office. His motive? Dean told of a telephone conversation, during which IRS staffers made rude remarks and joked about the disallowance of a contribution deduction. *** Julian Block is an attorney and author based in Larchmont, N.Y. He has been cited as “a leading tax professional” (New York Times), “an accomplished writer on taxes” (Wall Street Journal) and “an authority on tax planning” (Financial Planning Magazine). His books include Julian Block’s Easy Tax Guide for Writers, Photographers, and Other Freelancers: Trim Taxes to the Legal Minimum.

Read the full article →