April 2011

Cleco Corp. Announces Chief Executive Succession

April 25, 2011

Michael H. Madison Announces Plans to Step Down as CEO and Retire at the End of the Year Bruce A. Williamson to Be Appointed President and Chief Executive Officer in July

Read the full article →

Lease Up: H-P To Establish Software Innovation Center in Sunnyvale

April 25, 2011

After plans to accelerate its software development initiatives, HP leased 393,776 square feet in two Moffett Towers office buildings in Sunnyvale, CA, where it plans to create a software innovation center. The new facility will consolidate several of the tech firm’s offices across the Bay Area, including those at recently acquired Fortify and ArcSight, and will focus on the company’s IT management, automation and security software. “Software…

Read the full article →

Richard Kagan Named to AccelOps Board of Directors

April 25, 2011

Data Center and Cloud Service Monitoring Startup Continues Build-Out of Leadership Team to Propel Company Into Next Stage of Growth

Read the full article →

Semantic Advertising Leader Peer39 Expands Executive and Sales Teams

April 25, 2011

New Vice President of Finance From DoubleVerify, Senior Director of Agency Sales From MediaMath, and Business Development Manager From PointRoll Join New York Headquarters

Read the full article →

Video: IPhone May Store Location Data; Crude Oil Climbs: Video

April 25, 2011

April 25 (Bloomberg) — Jane King summarizes the top stories this morning on the Bloomberg Business Report. (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Morgans Hotel Group To Sell 3 Assets for $277M

April 25, 2011

Morgans Hotel Group (Nasdaq:MHGC), a hospitality company that specializes in the boutique hotel concept, agreed to sell the Mondrian Los Angeles to hotel REIT Pebblebrook Hotel Trust (NYSE: PEB) for $137 million, or approximately $578,059 per key. The deal is set to close this quarter. MHGC said the transaction is expected to generate about $40 million in net proceeds after applying a portion of it along with approximately $6 million of cash in…

Read the full article →

Naveen Jain: Bring Back America’s Spirit of Innovation and Entrepreneurship

April 25, 2011

As the U.S. economy slowly moves out of the recession, it’s a good bet that businesses started or led by immigrants will play a substantial role in creating jobs and driving growth. In high tech, for instance, 52 percent of startups launched between 1995 and 2005 were founded by immigrants, and foreign nationals have filed for a quarter of patents in recent years. So why are we so eager to send talented immigrants back to their home countries, instead of keeping them here so they can continue to innovate? Our unwillingness to champion entrepreneurs, no matter where they come from, is part of a larger attitude problem around entrepreneurship: We don’t celebrate their achievements as much as we should, and our government support of entrepreneurs is weak. The end result is that talent is attracted here to attend our finest educational institutions, but may not be so welcomed if it wants to stick around and start a business. It wasn’t always this way. Innovators were revered, and schoolchildren learned the names of the great inventors alongside the names of renowned statesmen. Today, people idolize athletes and celebrities — and yes, highly successful and visionary business people like Bill Gates or Steve Jobs, but not the innovators who perhaps have not seen such high-flying levels of success. Can anyone name the inventors of GPS, which has such a huge impact on our lives today? (For the record, Roger Easton, creator of some of the key technologies that led to GPS, was recently inducted into the National Inventors Hall of Fame .) Aside from an attitude shift toward the valuable contributions of entrepreneurs and inventors, we need to cultivate more support on a government level. We can learn valuable lessons from Start-Up Chile , an effort funded by the Chilean government that aims to attract early-stage entrepreneurs from all over the world to launch their businesses in that country. The program provides subsidies to teams of entrepreneurs along with access to sources of capital. It’s a great idea, and one that promises to reap benefits for the country’s economy as well as provide a source for jobs. We need our own American “mobilization” for entrepreneurship and innovators — one that provides both the practical and inspirational support that will attract foreign talent to bring and grow their ideas here, and will help our homegrown talent thrive. Here’s what we need to make this vision happen: Longer stays for entrepreneurs : We don’t have enough of our own innovators in this country, which means we need to encourage budding inventors and entrepreneurs to come here, and stay here. Our current system — the H-1B visa that allows workers to come here temporarily, along with temporary visas for college students — doesn’t provide a long-term solution. We need easy and hassle free access to ” entrepreneur’s visa ” — one that would give deserving startup innovators the time they need to conduct their research, start a company, and see it through to success. The impact on our economy and the job market would be significant. Support from the White House : The President needs to champion the power of entrepreneurship and innovation to help turn around the economy. This message needs to resonate with high school and college students who are poised to create the next generation of entrepreneurs. It will also help restore some luster to the dulled reputations of innovators. In other needs, we need to make entrepreneurship a cherished national value. Connections to markets and customers : The prevailing myth is that innovators and their businesses only need startup capital. But more valuable than money would be a mechanism to bring together budding companies with customers and sources of steady income — perhaps by showcasing their wares on the shelves of America’s powerhouse retailers. Under the direction of the President or a specially created entrepreneurship council, a hundred or so CEOs could meet entrepreneurs and learn more about their innovations. Major retailers could create an “innovation aisle” in their stores to promote new inventions, helping create a funding pipeline to worthy businesses. Programs for college entrepreneurs : More schools need to drive the growth of innovation and entrepreneurship via special training or degree tracks. For instance, Babson College infuses entrepreneurship throughout its curriculum — in fact, one of its most popular classes, the “Ultimate Entrepreneurial Challenge,” lets students compete against each other in business challenges (very much like TV’s The Apprentice ). Unfettered, creative and enthusiastic entrepreneurship is one of the hallmarks of American life, and allowed us to attract the best and brightest to this country. Let’s bring back this spirit of entrepreneurship — to make the U.S. an attractive venue for talent from all over the world, and to do a better job of nurturing young talent here at home.

Read the full article →

Grant Cardone: Are the Rich Greedy?

April 25, 2011

Are the rich really greedy or is this just what those that aren’t rich say about those that are? And can a person’s income or net worth determine whether that person is greedy or not? When a person is promoted from a $60,000 a year to one paying $250,000 do they suddenly become consumed with greed? It is preposterous to think that that amount of money a person earns or the wealth they control have anything to do with greed! Greed is defined as the excessive desire to possess wealth or goods with the intention to keep it for one’s self. Greed by definition is then determined by desire and intention not by a person’s net worth. It seems that the rich are most often labeled greedy by two groups: 1) those that haven’t created financial success. 2) those with political agendas. This labeling is created from myths and misinformation about the rich. The misconception that the rich don’t help or don’t do their part or that they are greedy only demonstrates a misunderstanding, even an ignorance about the rich and wealth. This thinking stands in the way of entire classes of people from ever improving their financial situations. The Obama administration asserts that financial literacy is a ‘national crisis’ . Surveys suggest 75% of all workers don’t know how much money they need for retirement. Multiple studies of 12th graders produced consistent failing scores of only 50-55% on practical money questions. In my seminars I often hear, “if I had $1 million I would use it to help the less fortunate.” I always respond, “The most effective way to help the less fortunate is to quit being one of the less fortunate!” If you don’t come from wealth, I didn’t, then the only way to create it today is through hard work, risks, entrepreneurial effort, innovative thinking and by saving and investing! Those that create wealth honestly should be admired not labeled. Go to any third world country and financial success is admired and perceived as an ethical issue — a duty, obligation, even a responsibility to ensure the survival of their futures. Be honest, do you have a resentment of rich people? Do you believe rich people are greedy, shallow, unhappy and dysfunctional? Do you believe that the rich got rich by stepping over others? Do you believe the rich made money their god or that they don’t care about the less fortunate? If you harbor any of these beliefs creating financial security for yourself and your family is going to be almost impossible! And what about all the misinformation and myths about the rich. Consider the most simple of facts that if you are reading this from a computer you are rich compared to most people in the world. 1/3 of the people on this planet live on less than $166 a month making even those at poverty levels in the USA wealthy by comparison! The median income in the USA is $44,000 a year but the world median income is $2000 a year. The next time you say, “the rich are greedy”, by world standards, you are talking about yourself! Also, we determine who is rich and who is not. You may resent the hedge fund guys on Wall Street or the CEO’s of the big banks but it is you and me investing in their funds and banks. Steve Jobs’ net worth is in the multi-billions and was determined by all of us buying his products and downloading apps onto iPhones and iPads. Not even a criminal, is able to create riches without the help, trust and support of the marketplace. Others suggest that the rich are greedy and don’t give their fare share. The top 1.4 million earners in 2008 paid over 38% of ALL the income taxes collected by the IRS. Also just those earning incomes over $1 million a year were responsible for over 50% of all charitable donations? I have been studying the wealthy for years and one of the biggest differences is a willingness to work with no pay in hopes of some bigger payoff later. The poor and middle class see working for nothing unthinkable. At the age of 29 I went into business for myself and my income dropped by 1/3 from my previous job with me working 20 hours a day. Minimum wage may have made a bigger middle class but it also trapped entire classes of people to think in terms how much they get per hour rather than their financial freedom. Before you jump on the ‘rich people are greedy’ bandwagon consider the facts: 1) Rich has nothing to do with greed. 2) They pay most of the taxes collected. 3) They are responsible for 50% of all charitable donations. 4) Resenting the rich guarantees that you will always be poor or you have a political agenda! Grant Cardone, NY Times Best Selling Author The 10X Rule-The Difference Between Success and Failure

Read the full article →

Robert Kuttner: A Double Dip Recession for 2012?

April 25, 2011

Economists are painting a pretty bleak picture of the economic outlook between now and the November 2012 election. Will this hurt President Obama’s re-election chances? Or will voters blame the Party of No? That, of course, partly depends on what kind of campaign Obama runs and partly on the Republicans. But first, let’s take stock (actually, maybe let’s sell stock). The Federal Reserve has been buying up lots of bonds to keep interest rates very low. The Fed disguises what it’s doing with the antiseptic and mystifying term, “quantitative easing,” or QE for short. This is the second time the central bank has tried this trick, hence the coy nickname, QE 2. The problem is that very low interest rates only take you so far in a depressed economy. For the most part the Fed’s policy has been good for large banks and good for the stock market. Ordinary borrowers, businesses and homebuyers have trouble getting credit. But other factors are starting to limit the effectiveness of very low interest rates. For one, the very low rates in the US are depressing confidence in the dollar. That means we start importing inflation. For another, rising commodity prices worldwide — partly the result of the Fed’s policy, partly due to rising demand in India and China — means increasing prices of consumer goods at home. Five-dollar-a-gallon gas is not good for President Obama. Nor is the practice of food processing companies shrinking the size of standard packages to disguise price increases. And in the one part of the economy that might benefit from a little inflation, low interest rates have not worked to levitate depressed housing values. The time-tested remedy, when cheap money ceases working, is expansive fiscal policy — government deficits and public investment. Now there’s an idea. Oops. Forget it. There is, of course, huge pressure from the nation’s opinion elites to cut the deficit, long before the economy is out of the woods. It comes from four potent sources. Wall Street deficit hawks have been banging these drums for three decades, even during the late 1990s when the budget was in surplus. The elite media buys this story, hook, line, and sinker. Big deficits are seen as proof of partisan gridlock and government irresponsibility. The six bipartisan horsemen of budget apocalypse, Senators Warner, Chambliss et. al. are widely depicted as fiscal heroes. The pundits seem to forget where these deficits came from. Republicans since Ronald Reagan have pursued a strategy of cutting taxes and then expressing shock at the ensuing deficit and demanding program cuts accordingly. We were already having historically high deficits when the recession began, because of the Bush tax cuts of 2001 and 2003. Today’s even more extreme Republicans would cut taxes further, slash outlays to their lowest level since before FDR, invoking the gods of deficit reduction. President Obama, for his part, has fanned these flames with his appointment of the Bowles-Simpson commission, and his premature shift, as early as the 2010 State of the Union Address, from the theme of economic recovery and job creation to that of deficit reduction. His recent address at George Washington University was terrific at holding the line on Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security, but bought into the premise that we need deficit reduction more than we need job creation. Why is Obama pursuing this strategy? Partly because his conservative economic advisers buy it, and partly because his political advisers look at polls that tell them voters care about deficits, especially political independents. But that current of public opinion exists only because opinion leaders — including Obama himself — have made such a fetish of deficits. There is a whole politics that just isn’t on the table: massive public investment to create jobs and growth — which then increase revenues and bring down the deficit. The political scientist Walter Dean Burnham refers to this sort of dynamic as “a politics of excluded of alternatives.” But wait, isn’t the deficit a real problem? Yes, and no. Eventually, deficits at the 2011 level are not sustainable. However, the current accumulated debt held by the public of about 60 percent of GDP is not dire. We could have two or three years of bigger deficits, very major public investment, let the debt ratio peak at 100% of GDP; and then stronger recovery, lower unemployment, and higher taxes on the wealthy would bring the debt ratio slowly down, as occurred after WW II. Japan’s debt ratio, for comparative purposes, is over 200 % of GDP — and Japan is increasing government outlay to repair the damage of the earthquake and tsunami. Britain’s, after World War II, was over 250 percent, and Britain went on to enjoy a postwar recovery. Why can’t we have massive public reparation with war or natural disaster? Because politicians lack the vision and nerve. Austerity will only slow down the recovery. The idea that a steeper path to deficit reduction will somehow restore business confidence and thus more than offset the hit to purchasing power is just blarney. And with both parties committed to some version of austerity, we could easily have the worst of both worlds — increasing inflation coupled with persistent stagnation. However much the Republicans are at fault–for creating the financial collapse, blocking a stronger stimulus in 2009, and looting the Treasury with tax cuts for the rich, causing much of the deficit problem in the first place — an incumbent president tends to take the blame for hard economic times. Obama’s talk of having a kinder, gentler brand of deficit reduction is no match for rising fuel and food prices and persistent worries about basic economic security. Can the president shift to a rhetoric and policy that emphasizes the need for more jobs and a stronger recovery, and soon? Let’s hope so. There is nothing like an election hanging to concentrate a politician’s mind. Robert Kuttner is co-editor of The American Prospect and a senior fellow at Demos. His latest book is A Presidency in Peril .

Read the full article →

Readying for Volatility in USD, GBP and Risk-Based Crosses

April 25, 2011

Readying for Volatility in USD, GBP and Risk-Based Crosses

Read the full article →

GBP/USD: Trading the Advance 1Q U.K. GDP Report

April 25, 2011

GBP/USD: Trading the Advance 1Q U.K. GDP Report

Read the full article →

US Dollar Subject to Increased Event Risk in Coming Days

April 25, 2011

US Dollar Subject to Increased Event Risk in Coming Days

Read the full article →

U.S. fluctuate by midday…

April 25, 2011

U.S. fluctuate by midday…

Read the full article →

U.S stocks open in red today…

April 25, 2011

U.S stocks open in red today…

Read the full article →

A Calm Start for the Week with Housing Data from the United States

April 25, 2011

A Calm Start for the Week with Housing Data from the United States

Read the full article →

Forex Strategy Outlook: Breakout Systems Attractive on High Volatility

April 25, 2011

Forex Strategy Outlook: Breakout Systems Attractive on High Volatility

Read the full article →

Commodity Bloc Correction On Tap, Additional Japanese Yen Strength Ahead

April 25, 2011

Commodity Bloc Correction On Tap, Additional Japanese Yen Strength Ahead

Read the full article →

The Euro, Aussie, and Canadian Dollar’s Magical Story in FXCM’s Speculative Sentiment Index (SSI) Diary

April 25, 2011

The Euro, Aussie, and Canadian Dollar’s Magical Story in FXCM’s Speculative Sentiment Index (SSI) Diary

Read the full article →

Guest Commentary: The Rising Instability in the Middle East and Its Relation With Oil Prices

April 25, 2011

Guest Commentary: The Rising Instability in the Middle East and Its Relation With Oil Prices

Read the full article →

USDJPY: Long Entry Set to Trigger?

April 25, 2011

USDJPY: Long Entry Set to Trigger?

Read the full article →

Total to increase Russia output 30-fold

April 25, 2011

Total to increase Russia output 30-fold

Read the full article →

Sales of video games, accessories decrease 4% in Mar

April 25, 2011

Sales of video games, accessories decrease 4% in Mar

Read the full article →

China’s CPI up to 108 in Q1

April 25, 2011

China’s CPI up to 108 in Q1

Read the full article →

Publicis to increase growth 5%

April 25, 2011

Publicis to increase growth 5%

Read the full article →

China’s trademark applications up 25.4% in Q1

April 25, 2011

China’s trademark applications up 25.4% in Q1

Read the full article →

China raises mandatory quota for rare metals production

April 25, 2011

China raises mandatory quota for rare metals production

Read the full article →

Spain’s hotel occupancy up 5%

April 25, 2011

Spain’s hotel occupancy up 5%

Read the full article →

Teacher fund managers get USD8.2m in bonuses

April 25, 2011

Teacher fund managers get USD8.2m in bonuses

Read the full article →

Mexico imposes USD1b fine against Telcel

April 25, 2011

Mexico imposes USD1b fine against Telcel

Read the full article →

PepsiCo to build $60m bottling plant in Afghanistan

April 25, 2011

PepsiCo to build $60m bottling plant in Afghanistan

Read the full article →

AT&T to sell suitcase cellular antennas

April 25, 2011

AT&T to sell suitcase cellular antennas

Read the full article →

Yen falls against major currencies with the beginning of the week

April 25, 2011

Yen falls against major currencies with the beginning of the week

Read the full article →

Gold and Silver Set Record Highs on China Buying Bets, Oil Eyes April Top

April 25, 2011

Gold and Silver Set Record Highs on China Buying Bets, Oil Eyes April Top

Read the full article →

FOREX: Yen Slumps as US Treasury Yields Rise Ahead of Bond Auction

April 25, 2011

FOREX: Yen Slumps as US Treasury Yields Rise Ahead of Bond Auction

Read the full article →

Chavez to raise oil windfall tax

April 25, 2011

Chavez to raise oil windfall tax

Read the full article →

Gold shines

April 25, 2011

Gold shines

Read the full article →

Portugal’s debt increases from 8.6% to 9.1%

April 25, 2011

Portugal’s debt increases from 8.6% to 9.1%

Read the full article →

Kewaunee, Sheboygan counties to impose sales taxes

April 25, 2011

Kewaunee, Sheboygan counties to impose sales taxes

Read the full article →

Germany- Luxury meets performance

April 25, 2011

Germany- Luxury meets performance

Read the full article →

Chinese stock markets decline on concern inflation rates to accelerate more expectations

April 25, 2011

Chinese stock markets decline on concern inflation rates to accelerate more expectations

Read the full article →

Steel demand to decline in 2011

April 25, 2011

Steel demand to decline in 2011

Read the full article →

Preeti Vissa: The Government Will Help You Build Wealth — Unless You Really Need the Help

April 24, 2011

A while back I wrote about asset poverty and how asset-building, not just income, is critical to achieving financial stability. The good news is that the federal government has a number of programs aimed at helping individuals and families build assets such as retirement savings or owning a home. The bad news is that this assistance is heavily skewed toward those who are already well-off, with very little help available to those who need it most. The Annie E. Casey Foundation and the Corporation for Enterprise Development laid all this out in depressing detail in a report issued last year that should have gotten more attention than it did. The report explains that most of this asset-building assistance doesn’t come in the form of government checks or loans, but rather as income tax breaks — deductions for mortgage interest, for example, or tax-deferred contributions to a retirement account. This means that the poor, who pay relatively little in income taxes, get next to nothing from these breaks. And even those of moderate income, who typically still don’t itemize deductions, get very little: “A typical middle-class household making $50,000 a year receives less than $500 in benefits from the most expansive of these federal policies annually; families making $100,000 get about $2,000. By contrast, taxpayers bringing in more than $1 million enjoy $95,820 in annual support through mortgage and property tax deductions and investment tax breaks.” The millionaires, in other words, get a 9.5 percent break, while those making $50,000 get only one percent. “Expressed differently,” the report notes, “more than half of the $400 billion in benefits go to the top 5 percent of taxpayers, those earning more than $167,000. Meanwhile, low-income families get next to nothing.” The mortgage interest deduction, for example, skews overwhelmingly toward higher-income taxpayers with large, expensive homes. Those of modest means trying to buy a more basic dwelling often find that this deduction doesn’t change their tax liability at all. And while the tax code is larded with breaks for big corporations, there is precious little aid for what are called “micro-entrepreneurs” — individuals with businesses that have five or fewer workers and involve under $35,000 in startup capital. Yet owning a small business is a proven way to build wealth and financial stability: Households with a business owner have more than double the likelihood of having an annual income exceeding $50,000 than those without a business owner. And at the very low end of the income scale, many federal programs actually punish attempts to save by cutting off benefits for those with even a small amount of assets. There are ways to fix this. Programs based on refundable tax credits rather than deductions are more likely to give meaningful help to low-income families. Caps on the value of homes or other deductible assets (particularly for second homes) would help level the playing field. And asset limits that bar those on government assistance from saving and building even minimal financial security need to be rethought. Many politicians get indignant when you talk about “income redistribution.” But right now, we have lots of policies that redistribute income upward, and it’s time for that to change.

Read the full article →

Laura Cococcia: New in the Neighborhood: Copper Kettles Brings a Bit of Home to Hoboken

April 24, 2011

That moment — the one where a person decides to throw caution to the wind and go after their passion — can be tricky. Particularly when it comes to launching a small business — knowing it’s the right thing to do is one thing, but having a vision and plan to get there is another. Simply put, starting one’s own business is a full plate of hard work. Knowing this reality didn’t stop Bina Patel, principal and owner of Copper Kettles , one of Hoboken’s latest Washington Street residents. We recently caught up to connect more about the story behind her success, clearly fueled by her passion. In the interview, Patel shares the story of leaving her advertising career and launching her own business, the decision behind opening its doors in Hoboken and the power of personal communities. Laura Cococcia: What inspired you to open Copper Kettles? Was there moment when you knew you had to follow your passion and just do this? Bina Patel: I’d always known that one day, I wanted to own my own business but I didn’t know what that business would be or when I’d do it. Just… someday. My two great passions in life are cooking and interior decorating, so I knew it would probably be something related to one or the other. Whenever my husband and I traveled (which we did, quite a bit), I was always on the lookout for unique tools and gadgets for my kitchen. Now, as any New Yorker can attest to, space is at a premium in the city so anything I bought had to be not only aesthetically pleasing but also functional. The impetus itself was the sale of the advertising company I worked for. Burnt out and filled with dread at the possibility of moving elsewhere to do the exact same thing yet again, I thought that if I was willing to work this hard 12 hours a day, why not do it for myself? The moment of inspiration came the third time a big name store like Pottery Barn or Restoration Hardware started featuring one of my great “finds” on their shelves and I realized that I might actually have a knack for this. Things just started falling into place after that. Six months later, Copper Kettles was born and, so far, I have no regrets. LC: What has been the most rewarding part of opening and owning your own business? The most challenging? BP: The most rewarding part of opening Copper Kettles — by far — has been the reaction of my customers. They’re amazing! Watching folks walk in the store and begin “ooh-ing and ahh-ing” over everything on the shelves is such a satisfying experience. The feedback is immediate and it’s a direct result of my choices and efforts. It’s a great feeling to have your hard work appreciated, whether that means selling a $1 million proposal or picking the right spatula. The most challenging has been to avoid overextending myself or the business. Now that I’ve got a few months under my belt, I’m beginning to see the possibilities and, being a dreamer by nature, I’m tempted to expand in directions I’d never even imagined when I began. With each new suggestion or criticism, I have to keep reminding myself that I can’t be all things to all people, and growth will come over time. There was a vision but it was never written in stone, so I can pick and choose what I want to do next and plan accordingly. It’s a journey, not an itinerary so if I can’t make it happen tomorrow, I know I can and will. LC: What drew you open Copper Kettles in Hoboken, rather than in Manhattan or other nearby areas? BP: Of course, rent was a key decision factor for starting my search for space outside of Manhattan. At an average of $200 per square foot for retail space in the city and the fact that I had no prior experience launching a new brick-and-mortar, New York City was too much of a risk, particularly in this economy. So I focused my search just outside, as I knew I’d be spending a lot of time there, particularly in the beginning, and the commute couldn’t be overwhelming. I was looking for a quaint little town with a great sense of community, a touch of the bohemian and of course, foot traffic. Hoboken offered that and more. With one of the few thriving Main Streets left in the region, Hoboken is a hub of activity throughout the year. Folks come in to walk Washington Street from all the neighboring cities and now, thanks to the success of TLC’s Cake Boss television show, from across the country as well. In fact, Washington was even voted as one of the ” Top 10 Great Streets in America. ” Between the intentional absence of “big box” stores and a 20-minute commute to/from the city, all signs pointed to “yes” when it came to opening up a boutique in Hoboken. LC: What advice would you offer to others looking to start their own business? BP: Resources are all around you, if you just take the time to look — so look. The Internet, of course, is an obvious first stop for “how-to” in this day and age but sometimes it’s a real face-to-face conversation that leads to the best — and sometimes unexpected — information. As mentioned earlier, I’d had no prior experience opening a retail shop but I had access to lots of people who had so I’d plague them with questions about everything from where to buy shelves to what kind of POS system I should use. And I didn’t just approach family and friends — I’d go into other boutiques and ask to speak to the owner, I’d talk to the clerks if they weren’t available and of course, grill vendors whether it was on the phone or at trade shows. I was surprised at how patient everyone was, and by the depth of the insights they were willing to share. Even if they didn’t provide any new information per se, 9 times out 10 they generated a lead that did. It’s those tidbits borne from experience that proved the most useful then and still do to this day. Another big surprise was finding out that everyone harbors a hidden talent and all they needed was the opportunity to showcase it. For me, I discovered a cousin and his buddy were wizards with hammers and a power drill — they helped put together all of my shelving and even provided suggestions for inventory after watching cooking shows (secretly, of course!) When word spread that I was opening a kitchen and housewares boutique, a childhood friend’s husband asked if I needed help with branding — he was trying to launch his own graphic design firm and needed case studies. The Copper Kettles logo was his first project. A former co-worker, unbeknownst to me, wanted to start her own organic soap company — her products are now one of the top sellers in the store. Even if they weren’t ready to ditch their jobs and embark on new careers just yet, Copper Kettles gave them a chance to test the waters and I got some great expert services at little to no cost. It was a win-win situation for all of us. Additional Information: Copper Kettles 536 Washington Street, Hoboken NJ 07030 Tel. (201) 850-1890 Copper Kettles is a boutique shoppe specializing in unique gifts and essentials for the kitchen. With an eye toward style that doesn’t sacrifice functionality, our goal is to make cooking a truly delightful experience from pot to plate!

Read the full article →

AP: US Default Could Be Disastrous Choice For Economy

April 24, 2011

WASHINGTON — The United States has never defaulted on its debt and Democrats and Republicans say they don’t want it to happen now. But with partisan acrimony running at fever pitch, and Democrats and Republicans so far apart on how to tame the deficit, the unthinkable is suddenly being pondered. The government now borrows about 42 cents of every dollar it spends. Imagine that one day soon, the borrowing slams up against the current debt limit ceiling of $14.3 trillion and Congress fails to raise it. The damage would ripple across the entire economy, eventually affecting nearly every American, and rocking global markets in the process. A default would come if the government actually failed to fulfill a financial obligation, including repaying a loan or interest on that loan. The government borrows mostly by selling bonds to individuals and governments, with a promise to pay back the amount of the bond in a certain time period and agreeing to pay regular interest on that bond in the meantime. Among the first directly affected would likely be money-market funds holding government securities, banks that buy bonds directly from the Federal Reserve and resell them to consumers, including pension and mutual funds; and the foreign investor community, which holds nearly half of all Treasury securities. If the U.S. starts missing interest or principal payments, borrowers would demand higher and higher rates on new bonds, as they did with Greece, Portugal and other heavily indebted nations. Who wants to keep loaning money to a deadbeat nation that can’t pay its bills? At some point, the government would have to slash spending in other areas to make room for any further sales of Treasury bills and bonds. That could squeeze payments to federal contractors, and eventually even affect Social Security and other government benefit payments, as well as federal workers’ paychecks. A default would likely trigger another financial panic like the one in 2008 and plunge an economy still reeling from high joblessness and a battered housing market back into recession. Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke calls failure to raise the debt limit “a recovery-ending event.” U.S. stock markets would likely tank – devastating roughly half of U.S. households that own stocks, either individually or through 401(k) type retirement programs. Eventually, the cost of most credit would rise – from business and consumer loans to home mortgages, auto financing and credit cards. Continued stalemate could also further depress the value of the dollar and challenge the greenback’s status as the world’s prime “reserve currency.” China and other countries that now hold about 50 percent of all U.S. Treasury securities could start dumping them, further pushing up interest rates and swelling the national debt. It would be a vicious cycle of higher and higher interest rates and more and more debt. The U.S. has long been the global standard for financial stability and creditworthiness, with Treasury securities seen as a fail-safe investment. But after the near-shutdown of the U.S. government and a new credit-rating report this week questioning the country’s fiscal health, Treasury bills and bonds are losing luster. If there is a debt limit deadlock, the government by this summer could find itself legally unable to borrow more money to pay its bills, beginning with interest on its debt and gradually extending to day-to-day federal operations. At some point, the government would have to decide which bills to pay and which to put aside. The debt ceiling will be hit on or around May 16, the Treasury Department says. Unlike the threatened government shutdown, the impact would start slowly, but then build mightily until the damage would be so dire that few political leaders or economists even want to contemplate it. The day of reckoning could likely be delayed at least until early July with creative bookkeeping. When the House first rejected the Bush administration’s $600-billion bank bailout in September 2008, the Dow Jones industrials went into a dizzying 778-point tailspin. A whiff of a possible similar stock market collapse came on Monday with a sharp selloff on Wall Street when the Standard & Poors lowered its outlook on U.S. debt to “negative” from “stable,” possibly a first step toward a possible downgrade of America’s coveted AAA credit rating. “We haven’t downgraded it. We just said, if nothing happens, we may have to,” said S&P chief economist David Wyss. He said a government default remains uncharted territory, “which is one reason why it’s not a good idea to hit the debt ceiling.” “There’s reason to worry,” said Wyss. “But my best guess is that we sort of muddle through this. Cuts will be made, they’ll be too little too late, but at least they will be enough to maintain a triple-A rating.” “It’s another game of chicken. And this time there are Mack trucks going at each other, not bumper cars. This is a biggie,” said American University political scientist James Thurber. But he predicted that, as in the past, “there will be an accommodation. They will avoid a crash.” Investment bank J.P. Morgan Chase recently concluded that any delay in making an interest or principal payments by the Treasury “even for a very short period of time” would have large “long-term adverse consequences for Treasury finances and the U.S. economy.” The analysis is being circulated on Capitol Hill by supporters of raising the debt limit. “If anyone wants to push that button, which I think would be catastrophic and unpredictable, I think they’re crazy,” JP Morgan CEO Jaime Dimon said recently of those seeking to block raising the debt limit. House Speaker John Boehner and most other GOP leaders agree on the need to raise the debt limit – and don’t want to be held responsible for a new financial meltdown. Still, they want Obama to make more concessions on spending cuts than he has done thus far. That isn’t sitting well with liberal Democrats, who think Obama has already given too much ground. One reason the two parties can’t find common ground: they can’t even agree on what’s causing high deficits. Democrats mostly blame it on policies of George W. Bush: two wars, tax cuts that continue to benefit the wealthy and an expensive prescription drug program. Republicans see government spending as the culprit, particularly on Obama’s watch. In fact, the main reason is the deep recession, which slashed tax revenues and led to hundreds of billions of dollars in recession-fighting spending by both Bush and Obama. The debt was $9 trillion in late 2007 before the start of the Great Recession, and it’s just a sliver under the $14.3 trillion limit today. Even though GOP leaders say they want to avoid more economic chaos, there is a large crop of tea-party aligned Republicans threatening to refuse to raise the cap under almost any circumstance. Polls suggest a large percentage of Americans oppose raising the debt limit. The debt limit has been raised ten times over the past decade. Obama voted against Bush’s debt-limit increase in 2006 as a senator, accusing Bush of “a leadership failure.” Obama recently apologized for “making what is a political vote as opposed to doing what was important for the country.”

Read the full article →

Economists: Fed’s Stimulus Has Been A Disappointment

April 24, 2011

But most Americans are not feeling the difference, in part because those benefits have been surprisingly small. The latest estimates from economists, in fact, suggest that the pace of recovery from the global financial crisis has flagged since November, when the Fed started buying $600 billion in Treasury securities to push private dollars into investments that create jobs.

Read the full article →

Obama’s Latest Obstacle

April 24, 2011

WASHINGTON — With gas prices climbing and little relief in sight, President Barack Obama is scrambling to get ahead of the latest potential obstacle to his re-election bid, even as Republicans are making plans to exploit the issue. No one seems more aware of the electoral peril than Obama himself. “My poll numbers go up and down depending on the latest crisis, and right now gas prices are weighing heavily on people,” he told Democratic donors in Los Angeles this past week. In fact, Obama raised the issue unsolicited in a series of town meetings in Virginia, California and Nevada that were ostensibly about his deficit-reduction plan. And he made the gas spike the subject of his weekly radio and Internet address Saturday. “It’s just another burden when things were already pretty tough,” he said. As Obama well knows, Americans love their cars and remain heavily dependent on them, and they don’t hesitate to punish politicians when the cost of filling their tanks goes through the roof. Indeed, for presidents, responding to sudden surges is a recurring frustration. “These gas prices are killing you right now,” Obama said at Facebook headquarters in Palo Alto, acknowledging that many Americans can’t afford new fuel-efficient cars and must drive older models.. For some, he said, the cost of a fill-up has all but erased the benefit of the payroll tax holiday that he and congressional Republicans agreed on last December. On Saturday, Obama insisted in his radio and Internet address that the best answer is a long-term drive to develop alternatives to fossil fuel. He also renewed calls to end $4 billion in subsidies for oil and gas companies. “Instead of subsidizing yesterday’s energy sources,” he said, “we need to invest in tomorrow’s.” Republicans contend that high gas prices are the inevitable result of an administration they accuse of stifling domestic drilling, and which placed new curbs on offshore exploration after last spring’s disastrous BP oil spill. “The administration has declared what can only be described as a war on American energy,” said Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell. “Obama is vulnerable on gas prices and the Republicans have and will exploit this as a wedge issue,” said James Thurber, who directs the Center for Congressional and Presidential Studies at American University. Legislative aides report House Republicans are considering a series of hearings and floor votes on measures to boost domestic oil and gas production when Congress returns from its Easter break. Meantime, Obama has ordered his Justice Department to form a task force to look for fraud or manipulation in the oil markets. It will “root out” any abuses, he told a town meeting in Reno, Nev. The president is among those who’ve said the surging price for crude is caused by worries about political upheaval in the Arab world and increasing demand from China and elsewhere. Still, Americans have a tradition of holding the party in power responsible for rising gas costs. Obama’s focus on the issue came as a New York Times/CBS News poll published Thursday found that 70 percent of the public believes the country is headed in the wrong direction. That followed a March AP-GfK survey reflecting widespread discontent over the economy, with just 15 percent seeing an economic improvement the previous month. Through the spring, Obama’s approval numbers in several polls have slipped. “Gas prices are a major factor in his slide … along with unemployment and his talk about cuts and tax increases to deal with deficits and debt,” Thurber said. The national average price for a gallon of regular gasoline is currently $3.84, almost a dollar higher than a year ago. In many places, it’s well over $4. The gas price debate has a sense of deja vu to it, Obama notes. Vows to end dependence on expensive oil imports go back to Richard Nixon’s “Project Independence”, a 1973 response to the Arab oil embargo, and this has been a popular refrain by presidents of both parties over the last 40 years. “Whenever gas prices shoot up, like clockwork, you see politicians racing to the cameras, waving three-point plans for two dollar gas,” Obama said in Saturday’s address. But when prices subside, those plans are quietly shelved. Even calls to target price gouging have a familiar ring. When gas hit $3 a gallon in 2006, George W. Bush launched a probe, declaring Americans “don’t want and will not accept … manipulation of the market. And neither will I.” Seven months later, Bush took what he called a “thumping” in mid-term elections. Of course, other issues – especially Iraq – played a big role. But Obama can’t help pondering that example, and wondering what rising gas prices could do to his hopes for a second term.

Read the full article →

When Is Tracking Too Much?

April 24, 2011

SAN FRANCISCO — If you’re worried about privacy, you can turn off the function on your smartphone that tracks where you go. But that means giving up the services that probably made you want a smartphone in the first place. After all, how smart is an iPhone or an Android if you can’t use it to map your car trip or scan reviews of nearby restaurants? The debate over digital privacy flamed higher this week with news that Apple Inc.’s popular iPhones and iPads store users’ GPS coordinates for a year or more. Phones that run Google Inc.’s Android software also store users’ location data. And not only is the data stored – allowing anyone who can get their hands on the device to piece together a chillingly accurate profile of where you’ve been – but it’s also transmitted back to the companies to use for their own research. Now, cellphone service providers have had customers’ location data for almost as long as there have been cellphones. That’s how they make sure to route calls and Internet traffic to the right place. Law enforcement analyzes location data on iPhones for criminal evidence – a practice that Alex Levinson, technical lead for firm Katana Forensics, said has helped lead to convictions. And both Apple and Google have said that the location data that they collect from the phones is anonymous and not able to be tied back to specific users. But lawmakers and many users say storing the data creates an opportunity for one’s private information to be misused. Levinson, who raised the iPhone tracking issue last year, agrees that people should start thinking about location data as just as valuable and worth protecting as a wallet or bank account number. “We don’t know what they’re going to do with that information,” said Dawn Anderson, a creative director and Web developer in Glen Mills, Pa., who turned off the GPS feature on her Android-based phone even before the latest debate about location data. She said she doesn’t miss any of the location-based services in the phone. She uses the GPS unit in her car instead. “With any technology, there are security risks and breaches,” she added. “How do we know that it can’t be compromised in some way and used for criminal things?” Privacy watchdogs note that location data opens a big window into very private details of a person’s life, including the doctors they see, the friends they have and the places where they like to spend their time. Besides hackers, databases filled with such information could become inviting targets for stalkers, even divorce lawyers. Do you sync your iPhone to your computer? Well, all it would take to find out where you’ve been is simple, free software that pulls information from the computer. Voila! Your comings and goings, clandestine or otherwise, helpfully pinpointed on a map. One could make the case that privacy isn’t all that prized these days. People knowingly trade it away each day, checking in to restaurants and stores via social media sites like Foursquare, uploading party photos to Facebook to be seen by friends of friends of friends, and freely tweeting the minutiae of their lives on Twitter. More than 500 million people have shared their personal information with Facebook to connect with friends on the social networking service. Billions of people search Google and Yahoo each month, accepting their tracking “cookies” in exchange for access to the world’s digital information. And with about 5 billion people now using cellphones, a person’s location has become just another data point to be used for marketing, the same way that advertisers now use records of Web searches to show you online ads tailored to your interest in the Red Sox, or dancing, or certain stores. Autumn Bradfish, a sophomore at the University of Iowa, said she doesn’t see a problem with phone companies using her location to produce targeted ads, as long as they deliver relevant offers to her. She said she would not disable the tracking feature on her iPhone because she enjoys using a mapping app that helps her find new restaurants. “I’m terrible with maps,” she said. The very fact that your location is a moving target makes it that much more alluring for advertisers. Every new place you go represents a new selling opportunity. In that sense, smartphone technology is the ultimate matchmaker for marketers looking to assemble profiles on prospective customers. That profiling is what makes some users uneasy. At a technology conference in San Francisco this past week, security researchers disclosed that iPhones and iPads keep a small file of location data on their users. That file – which is not encrypted and thus vulnerable to hacking – is transferred when you sync your phone to your computer to back up information. Security firm F-Secure Corp. said the iPhone sends users’ location data to Apple twice a day to improve its database of known Wi-Fi networks. The data that is available goes back to last year’s launch of Apple’s new iOS 4 operating software. Researchers say the tracking was going on before that, though the file was in a different format and wasn’t easy to find until the new system came out. In June, Apple added a section to its privacy policy to note that it would collect some real-time location data from iPhone users in order to improve its features. While Apple has been silent about the latest findings, it has noted that its practice is clearly spelled out in user agreements. Other phone makers say the same. Google acknowledged this past week that it does store some location data directly on phones for a short time from users who have chosen to use GPS services, “in order to provide a better mobile experience on Android devices.” It too stressed that any location sharing on Android is done with the user’s permission. But consumer advocates warn that too many people click right through privacy notifications and breeze over or ignore such legalese. Case in point _some iPhone users who found about this past week about the data storage say they didn’t know anything about Apple’s tracking. “It’s like being stalked by a secret organization. Outrageous!” said Jill Kuraitis, 54, a freelance journalist in Boise, Idaho. “To be actively tracking millions of people without notification? It’s beyond unacceptable.” It’s easy to tell smartphone users that turning off tracking is as easy as finding their way to the settings menu. But to opt out of GPS service means preventing the software on your phone from using any information about where you are. That means cutting yourself off from the vast array of mobile apps that offer discounts and ads, allow you to connect more easily with friends who use social media, and simplify your life with map directions. Not a great trade-off. And if you thought there were laws that curbed tracking, think again. The government prohibits telephone companies from sharing customer data, including location information, with outside parties without first getting the customer’s consent. But those rules don’t apply to Apple and other phone makers. Nor do they apply to the new ecosystem of mobile services offered through those apps made by third-party developers. What’s more, because those rules were written for old-fashioned telephone service, it’s unclear whether they apply to mobile broadband service at all – even for wireless carriers that are also traditional phone companies, like AT&T Inc. and Verizon. Both the Federal Communications Commission and the Federal Trade Commission have said they are looking into the issue. But for now, it’s up to smartphone users to decide: Is it privacy they are most concerned about, or convenience? ___ AP writers Ryan J. Foley in Iowa City, Iowa, Kathy Matheson in Philadelphia and AP Technology Writers Joelle Tessler in Washington and Peter Svensson in New York contributed to this report.

Read the full article →

No More Bag Check Discounts

April 24, 2011

CHICAGO — There’s no more incentive to prepay online for your checked bags if you’re flying United Continental. The carrier has done away with the $2 to $3 discount that passengers used to get if they paid for their luggage online instead of at the ticket counter. The charge for domestic flights operated by Chicago-based United Continental Holdings Inc. is now $25 for the first bag and $35 for the second, no matter how or when you pay. The change began for tickets sold since March 9. United and Continental used to offer a $2 discount on the first bag and $3 off the second to encourage passengers to pay up before arriving at the airport. Delta Air Lines Inc. still offers a similar discount. Other carriers, including AMR Corp.’s American Airlines, never offered different prices. Southwest Airlines Co. continues to allow passengers to check two bags for free.

Read the full article →

Republicans Facing Tough Questions Over Proposed Medicare Overhaul

April 24, 2011

Anxiety is rising among some Republicans over the party’s embrace of a plan to overhaul Medicare, with GOP lawmakers already starting to face tough questions on the issue at town hall meetings back in their districts.

Read the full article →