July 2011

American’s Confidence could plummet slighlty in June while Housing data tops the U.S. scene

July 26, 2011

The U.S Housing sector is still hammered from the remains of the worst financial crisis since WW2, as housing releases continue to show mixed signals confirming activities have frustratingly …

Read the full article →

U.S. Dollar Offered Lower Following Confidence, Housing Data

July 26, 2011

THE TAKEAWAY: U.S. Consumer Confidence Unexpectedly Rebounds > Outlook on Labor Market Improving > U.S. Dollar Bullish THE TAKEAWAY: U.S. New-Home Sales Disappoint > Labor Market, …

Read the full article →

Aussie Surges to Near Record Highs as U.S. Dollar Losses Steepen

July 26, 2011

Daily Winners and Losers The greenback continued to fall against all its major counterparts in the overnight sessions, with the Aussie toping the performance charts, advancing more than 0.90% at …

Read the full article →

U.S. Dollar Falls Flat as Debt-Deadlock Rages On

July 26, 2011

The U.S. Dollar was offered lower across the major currencies in the Asian and European sessions as it remains abundantly clear that neither Democrats nor Republicans are willing to give way from …

Read the full article →

Forex: U.S. Dollar Correction On Tap, Euro To Maintain Trend

July 26, 2011

Talking Points U.S. Dollar: Consumer Confidence, New Home Sales On Tap Euro: Breaks Above 78.6% Fib, ECB Sees Slowing Recovery British Pound: U.K. GDP, Service-Based Activity …

Read the full article →

U.S. Dollar Index Threatens Trend, AUD Eyes Record-High

July 26, 2011

DJ FXCM Dollar Index Index Last High Low Daily Change (MENAFN)374.85 -0.77 136.98% The Dow Jones-FXCM U.S. Dollar index extended the sharp reversal from earlier …

Read the full article →

A weak dollar…

July 26, 2011

The greenback saw a decline during the day dear reader against major currencies following the release of the report of consumer confidence for the month of July, which rose better than expected …

Read the full article →

U.S. Stocks extend plunge by midday…

July 26, 2011

U.S Stocks extended slump throughout Tuesday’s trading, driving benchmark indexes low for the second consecutive day, in light of fierce debt-limit talks as the country’s steps closer to …

Read the full article →

GBP/CHF Revisited- Trend Remains Intact, another Short Channel Scalp

July 26, 2011

The GBP/CHF has maintained a well defined descending channel formation since the start of April as haven flows continued to support the franc. This pair was the topic of a scalp report last week …

Read the full article →

U.S stocks close in red as fears persist…

July 26, 2011

U.S Stocks extended slump throughout Tuesday’s trading, driving benchmark indexes low for the second consecutive day, in light of fierce debt-limit talks as the country’s steps closer to …

Read the full article →

U.S. Dollar Plummets to Key Support Level- Traders Eye Debt Talks

July 26, 2011

The greenback was markedly lower for the 6th consecutive day with the Dow Jones FXCM Dollar Index (MENAFN)e Dow, the S&P 500, and the NASDAQ off 0.73%, 0.41%, and 0.10% respectively. The …

Read the full article →

Buy EUR/CAD Above 20-DMA, 38.2 Fibo

July 26, 2011

The Euro-Loonie pair has traded in a descending channel for nearly two and a half months, shaving off over 600-pips from the High set on May 5 to today. The pair has been quite volatile, trading …

Read the full article →

Drillsearch Energy Limited (ASX:DLS) and QGC Form A$130M Cooper Basin Shale Gas Joint Venture

July 26, 2011

http://www.abnnewswire.net/rss2/menafn/abn_menafn_en.asp Drillsearch Energy Ltd (MENAFN) with QGC a BG Group (LON:BG) company (“QGC”), to explore and develop unconventional shale and tight gas …

Read the full article →

Sino Gas And Energy Holdings Limited (ASX:SEH) Well Testing Program Continues to Achieve Strong Results

July 26, 2011

http://www.abnnewswire.net/rss2/menafn/abn_menafn_en.asp Sino Gas & Energy Holdings Limited (MENAFN) on the TB08 well. Sino Gas has re-flowed one of the upper zones in the TB08 well that was …

Read the full article →

Donna Flagg: How to Manage Difficult People

July 26, 2011

If you’re a manager, then you know what it is to have a problem employee and are probably also familiar with how difficult he or she is to handle. It can be perplexing because no matter what you do, he or she doesn’t seem to improve. In fact, more often than not, the situation becomes worse. I can’t tell you how many managers have told me that they wished they hadn’t wasted their valuable time, energy and resources trying to make bad employees into good ones or turn destructive behavior into its constructive counterpart. They talk about the aggravation and frustration that takes its toll only to end up in the same place every time: the employee has to go. Overwhelmingly they say they walked away from the situation having learned the hard way that people don’t change because someone else wants them to, even if it is their boss and even if they cognitively know that the end of their employment could be near. Rather, it is usually a case that proves true the old adage that people only change if — and when — they want to. Most commonly, managers become overly focused on the employee with the performance and/or attitude problem and then expend an inordinate amount of effort trying to “fix” them. We think that by taking disciplinary action, creating performance development plans and engaging in corrective counseling, we will be able to instill incentives in employees that in turn move them forward. Not so. Instead, managers end up chasing their tails, spinning their wheels and banging their heads against the wall, all for naught, most of the time. Despite what we think, we do not have the power we need to intrinsically influence folks at the level necessary, no matter how intricate and well thought out our systems may be. That being said, there are ways to handle problem employees that reduce the stress, minimize their taxing effect, expedite the process and contain the collateral damage they tend to create. All we need to do is flip it. Flip the focus. Flip the strategy. Stop trying to change people and start trying to create an opportunity for them to change themselves, should they decide it is in their best interest to do so. This way business continues as usual while the problem employee makes a choice as to whether he or she wants to jump on board — or off. It’s clean and easy without all the hassle. You don’t waste your time, can invest it in matters more apt to produce a positive return and have a new system in place that fosters a healthy, low-maintenance, low-drama environment, which is better for everyone involved including the business itself. So first, paint a picture that illustrates what you expect and communicate it to the employee. Second, be crystal clear about what is acceptable and what is not and stress in specific, no uncertain terms which behaviors will not be tolerated. And third, explain what will happen when and if the next infraction or incident occurs. Then do your own thing and give him or her the space to sink or swim. Finally, the only way this works is if you follow through on what you say. If you don’t, the wrong message is a mixed message and the situation becomes worse than before. Find Donna on: Krysalis Amazon Facebook YouTube

Read the full article →

FAA Shutdown Has Lawmakers Trading Blame Over Airport Project Halts

July 26, 2011

WASHINGTON — House and Senate leaders exchanged blame Monday for the legislative stalemate that precipitated a partial shutdown of the Federal Aviation Administration while making no overture to resolve the dispute. The FAA’s operating authority expired at midnight Friday, forcing a partial shutdown of the agency. Dozens of airport construction projects across the country have been put on hold and thousands of federal employees were out of work. Air traffic controllers have continued to work, as well as FAA employees who inspect the safety of planes and test pilots. Transportation officials have said safety won’t be compromised. But it was unclear how long the FAA can continue day-to-day operations before travelers begin to feel the effects of the shutdown. Rep. John Mica, R-Fla., chairman of the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee, said there have been no negotiations between the Republican-led House and the Democratic-led Senate to resolve the dispute. Republican leaders said they are determined to hold to their position that the Senate must accept a House-passed bill to extend the FAA’s operating through mid-September even though it contains a provision eliminating $16.5 million in air service subsidies for 13 rural airports that Democrats say is unacceptable. “This is sort of sad, you know,” Mica told reporters. “On the eve of the country’s finances near collapse, it’s sort of symbolic of the whole problem here: No one is willing to eliminate any wasteful programs.” The subsidy program was created after airlines were deregulated in 1978 to ensure continued service on less profitable routes to remote communities. Not all those communities are remote anymore. The GOP provision would end subsidies to communities less than 90 miles from a hub airport or where subsidies average greater than $1,000 per passenger. Democrats said the real issue is that Republicans are insisting Democrats accept a host of contentious provisions added to a long-term FAA spending bill approved by the House in April. Among their key differences is a GOP proposal sought by industry that would make it more difficult for airline workers to unionize. The Senate passed its own long-term funding bill in February without the labor provision, which Democrats insist much be dropped. They also accused Republicans of tying the elimination of rural air subsidies to their extension bill as a means to prod Democrats to make concessions on the labor issue. “House Republicans are nowhere to be found, refusing to come back to the negotiating table after pulling yet another cheap political stunt at the expense of rural Americans,” Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., said in a statement. “Their reckless intransigence has not only shut down the FAA, but is threatening Congress’ ability to successfully complete work on the long-term FAA reauthorization that our economy and the livelihoods of thousands depend upon,” he said. The shutdown is costing the FAA about $30 million a day in lost revenue because airlines no longer have authority to collect ticket taxes. That money goes into an aviation trust fund. The fund “has a healthy balance now, but that would be depleted in fairly rapid order” without congressional action, FAA Administrator Randy Babbitt told reporters in a conference call. Nearly 4,000 FAA employees in 35 states, and the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico, who are paid from the trust fund have been furloughed. About $2.5 billion in federal airport construction grants cannot be processed because workers who handle those grants have been furloughed, officials said. That, in turn, has halted construction projects, putting hundreds of other people employed by those jobs out of work. Dozens of stop-work orders were issued over the weekend for projects to build and modernize airport control towers, as well as other improvement projects, officials said. Many of the airport projects are designed to improve the efficiency of air travel and reduce congestion. “This is simply going to slow down our ability to expand to keep up with growing traffic demands,” Babbitt said. For example, work was scheduled to begin Saturday on a $6 million project to demolish a control tower at New York’s LaGuardia Airport. But the Paul J. Scariano construction firm laid off 40 workers who were assigned to the demolition project, leaving the partly dismantled tower unattended, company vice president Luca Toscano said. “I’m worried about the planes underneath,” Toscano said. “There’s nobody up there keeping an eye on the equipment or scaffolding or anything. If we get a bad storm, a piece of wood or something might go flying.” Work also has stopped for new control towers at airports in Las Vegas, Palm Springs, Calif., Oakland, Calif., Wilkes-Barre, Pa., Kalamazoo, Mich., and Gulfport, Miss., among other projects, officials said. At Oakland International Airport, 60 people working on the facility’s new $31 million control tower were told not to report to work on Monday, said Rosemary Barnes, an airport spokeswoman. Barnes said the construction workers would not get paid until the issue was resolved. Long-term funding authority for the FAA expired in 2007. Unable to agree on new long-term funding legislation for the agency, Congress has kept the FAA operating through a series of 20 short-term extension bills. ___ Associated Press writers Christopher Hawley in New York and Jason Dearen in San Francisco contributed to this report. ___ Online: FAA work stop orders: http://www.faa.gov/news/media/workstop/

Read the full article →

Ernan Roman: What’s Your Marketing Innovation Score?

July 26, 2011

Last December, I wrote two blogs ( Top 10 Marketing Challenges Part 1 , Part 2 ) to help corporate leaders with marketing management responsibilities. In those blogs, I warned of 10 “game-changer” challenges that these executives would face in 2011, given the rise of social media and a newly empowered consumer. Now it’s time to look at the list again… and assess your company’s progress in meeting each of these ten challenges. The resulting numerical score is your enterprise’s MIQ (Marketing Innovation Quotient) score. MARKETING INNOVATION CHALLENGE #1. Accept that the balance of power between buyer and seller has changed… forever. We have identified new ways our company can provide clearly defined, competitively differentiating value both at the point of purchase and throughout the customer’s lifecycle. Mid-year assessment score: 0 (no action taken yet in 2011) to 10 (industry role model) ____ MARKETING INNOVATION CHALLENGE #2. Completely re-think how you view your customers. We have made Customer Lifetime Value an essential business metric within our organization. Mid-year assessment score: 0 (no action taken yet in 2011) to 10 (industry role model): ____ MARKETING INNOVATION CHALLENGE #3. Stop chasing the “quickie”. Build relationships instead. The allocation of budget and resources has been shifted from a traditional focus on acquisition, to a balance between acquisition and retention. We have changed our compensation plans from an acquisition/new sales focus to reflect retention and repeat customer purchases. Mid-year assessment score: 0 (no action taken yet in 2011) to 10 (industry role model): ____ Note: Additional insights are contained in Ernan’s manifesto ” Don’t You Want to Do Real Marketing ?” published by 800-CEO-Read. MARKETING INNOVATION CHALLENGE #4. Communicate with customers and prospects through multiple channels. We emphasize the value of engaging with our company via all media and channels. Then we personalize the communications per individual opt-in preferences, so the value and relevance is obvious. Mid-year assessment score: 0 (no action taken yet in 2011) to 10 (industry role model): ____ MARKETING INNOVATION CHALLENGE #5. Create uniquely powerful opt-in preference-driven databases. Rethink your marketing so it provides unquestionable value from the consumer’s point of view. We have conducted research to identify the value propositions required to engage customers to opt-in and share their media, message, and offer preferences. We have developed an opt-in database to drive preference-based communications. Mid-year assessment score: 0 (no action taken yet in 2011) to 10 (industry role model): ____ MARKETING INNOVATION CHALLENGE #6. Re-design your web site to meet customer expectations. Given the rise of social media and the newly empowered consumer, re-think your entire website strategy. We have learned how customers and prospects define value and relevance, and we have followed their lead by connecting them with easy access to peers, subject matter experts, and the right people within our own organization. Mid-year assessment score: 0 (no action taken yet in 2011) to 10 (industry role model): ____ MARKETING INNOVATION CHALLENGE #7. Give customer service the respect it deserves. We have abandoned the view of customer service as an operations expense line-item, repositioned it as a revenue center, and synchronized it with our marketing efforts. Mid-year assessment score: 0 (no action taken yet in 2011) to 10 (industry role model): ____ MARKETING INNOVATION CHALLENGE #8. Don’t let short-term financial objectives destroy your long-term customer-focused strategies. We use quarterly financial forecasts as tools. We don’t let the tools run the business. Our organization’s strategies are focused on building and sustaining strong customer relationships. Mid-year assessment score: 0 (no action taken yet in 2011) to 10 (industry role model):____ MARKETING INNOVATION CHALLENGE #9: Model the behavior and the priorities. We have created an Employee Council and meet with its members at least once a quarter to hear about what is and what is not working. We model the resulting new behaviors and priorities from the top down. From the Mid-year assessment score: 0 (no action) to 10 (industry role model): ____ MARKETING INNOVATION CHALLENGE #10. Accept that ultimately, the responsibility for moving away from “business as usual” in any and all of these areas lies with senior leadership. If customer feedback dictates that a change is necessary in any area of our organization, our president, founder, or CEO is willing to make the necessary changes. Mid-year assessment score: 0 (no action) to 10 (industry role model): ____ Next Step: Share your organization’s midyear MIQ score with the senior management team… and identify specific areas for improvement in the second half of 2011. Ernan Roman is President of the marketing consultancy, Ernan Roman Direct Marketing. Recognized as the industry pioneer who created three transformational methodologies: Integrated Direct Marketing, Opt-In Marketing, and Voice of Customer Relationship Research. Clients include Microsoft, NBC Universal, Disney, Hewlett-Packard and IBM. Ernan was named to “B to B’s Who’s Who” as one of the “100 most influential people” in Business Marketing by Crain’s B to B Magazine. His fourth and latest book on marketing best practices is titled: Voice of the Customer Marketing: A Proven 5-Step Process to Create Customers Who Care, Spend, and Stay . Ernan is also the co-author of “Opt-In Marketing: Increase Sales Exponentially with Consensual Marketing” and author of “Integrated Direct Marketing: The Cutting Edge Strategy for Synchronizing Advertising, Direct Mail, Telemarketing and Field Sales.” www.erdm.com ernan@erdm.com

Read the full article →

Obama To Address Nation About Debt Ceiling Crisis

July 25, 2011

WASHINGTON — The White House says President Barack Obama will address the nation at 9 p.m. Monday to discuss the approaching debt limit deadline and an apparent political stalemate over deficit reduction proposals. White House spokesman Jay Carney announced the address after House Republican and Senate Democratic leaders unveiled competing plans to meet an Aug. 2 deadline to raise the government’s borrowing authority. Obama is supporting a proposal by Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid that would trim $2.7 trillion of government spending over 10 years. Reid’s plan does not include new tax revenue, as Obama has demanded. But unlike the GOP plan, it would extend the debt ceiling into 2013 – an Obama ultimatum. The House plan trims about $1.2 tillion but would only extend the debt ceiling for less than a year. THIS IS A BREAKING NEWS UPDATE. Check back soon for further information. AP’s earlier story is below. President Barack Obama is reiterating his call for a deficit-cutting plan that cuts spending and that also increases tax revenue by making the wealthy and corporations pay more to help stabilize the long-term debt. The president made his comments to the National Council of La Raza on Monday as congressional leaders struggled against time to come up with a plan to meet an Aug. 2 deadline to raise the nation’s debt ceiling. Obama said the wealthy and big corporations have to “pay their fair share, too.” And he alluded to the difficulty of cutting a deal, saying “compromise is becoming a dirty word.”

Read the full article →

ShareThis Names Former Google AdSense Executive Kurt Abrahamson as New CEO

July 25, 2011

Abrahamson to Focus on Scaling the ShareThis Platform for Massive Growth, Expansion and Leadership in Online Content and Advertising Economy

Read the full article →

Patricia Harned: After the Debacle: How News Corp Can Rebuild Trust

July 25, 2011

NewsCorp executive and scion James Murdoch, the man who oversaw the News of the World ( NOTW ), said the leadership of the now shuttered British tabloid “failed to get to the bottom of repeated wrongdoing that occurred without conscience or legitimate purpose.” But many wonder, amid a parade of arrests and revelation, whether the phone hacking and bribery at NOTW are truly the actions of one NewsCorp enterprise or an example of the company’s overall corporate culture. Events to date demonstrate that even experienced messengers, like those at NewsCorp, can struggle when the spotlight turns on them. This is why a recent report by the Ethics Resource Center’s Fellows program — Accepting Responsibility Responsibly: Corporate Response in Times of Crisis — advised Boards to put a crisis plan in place before disaster strikes. But for the Murdochs and their executive team, the time for planning ahead has passed. Now investigators, elected officials, and the general public rightfully want to know why the families of murder victims and soldiers were targeted by hackers. However contrite or creative its explanations for past acts, this is the time for NewsCorp to build a new corporate conscience. NewsCorp is now literally fighting for its life. The best defense, as we have seen with companies that have survived such crises, is not to spin its story, but to start writing a new one. But when asked by Members of Parliament if editors at other NewsCorp operations were reviewing their newsrooms to insure NOTW -type tactics were not being replicated, Rupert Murdoch answered “No, but I am more than prepared to do so.” The future of NewsCorp depends on just how prepared Mr. Murdoch really is. That review is just as critical as any other measure to NewsCorp uses to restore its name. To address the growing perception this problem reaches well beyond one paper, the company must revisit and reassert its corporate values. NewsCorp must spell out for every employee the core belief, from its very own standards of conduct that “Compliance with the law is crucial to the reputation of NewsCorp and its business units.” The challenge is making clear those are not just words on a page. NewsCorp must go beyond the newsroom, and into the boardroom, to create real reform. Our research suggests that NewsCorp can restore its good standing by embracing some cornerstone measures: Publicly reaffirm the primacy of its “Standards of Business Conduct” as the foundation for employee conduct all the way to the Executive Suite and provide employees. Live up to them. Set a tone at the top that consistently reinforces these values through both words and deeds. Tell employees, shareholders, and customers how company standards are guiding your decisions during this crisis. Hold accountable individuals at every level of the organization who have violated standards of professional conduct. Employees need to see that your company will conduct a fair investigation to identify the individuals who have been involved in this scandal. Renew attention to organizational culture and root out mixed messages or subtle signals that might open the door to misconduct. Not only can such measures restore public respect, but our 2009 National Business Ethics Survey® found that good conduct becomes self-reinforcing. In a strong ethical culture where employees are more committed to the company, workplace misconduct can be reduced by as much as 50%. Full-page newspaper ads and even personal apologies to the victims of this scandal look impressive. But post-recession consumers, who are more aware of the character of a parent company than ever before, are unlikely to be persuaded by gestures. Real recovery for NewsCorp will take time, discipline, and a concrete, top down commitment to ethical business conduct. Patricia J. Harned is President of ERC, which recently published Accepting Responsibility Responsibly, a report on how ethical values can guide an organization through crisis.

Read the full article →

Yadkin Valley Bank and Subsidiary Sidus Financial to Align Focus on Retail Mortgage Operations

July 25, 2011

F. Spencer Cosby, Jr. Announces Retirement Effective December 31, 2011

Read the full article →

The Real Housing Fix: Common-Sense Lending

July 25, 2011

It will take years before we can truly assess how far out of whack the real estate market was at the pinnacle of the housing boom last decade. That’s important to remember when assessing the current dismal state of the U.S. housing market. Lax lending standards that in 2005 allowed almost anyone to get a mortgage have been tightened considerably in the past couple of years — so much so that many housing experts believe the tougher standards are what’s blocking a sustained housing recovery.  The often-used analogy is that of a pendulum that swung a long way in one direction and has now inevitably swung a nearly equal distance in the opposite direction. Of course, no one questions why the new standards emerged. They are a direct response to a lending-era dominated by no income/no asset mortgages, otherwise known as “no doc” or liar loans.  The dilemma now is how to find a comfortable middle-ground.  Specifically, what’s needed are lending standards that balance the need for accountability and responsibility while at the same time fulfilling the important function that mortgages have served for decades — making homeownership an affordable option for millions of Americans. Nothing less than the health of the U.S. economy depends on it.  (New Home Sales Slip in June ) The U.S. has a “national priority of homeownership,” said Ron Phipps, president of the National Association of Realtors . “But it has to be sustainable. That should be the preface to the conversation about homeownership in the U.S.” The mortgage industry has taken important strides toward that goal of sustainability, reining in its practices in an effort to ensure that borrowers can actually repay their loans. There’s a movement afoot that would establish a national set of mortgage servicing standards designed to reduce costs to lenders and consumers alike, and also make the process more transparent and less cumbersome and confusing. The Mortgage Bankers Association supports the effort, arguing that consumers and lenders would benefit from a uniform set of standards that would cut down on paperwork and reduce legal expenses for both borrowers and lenders by significantly streamlining the process. “We at MBA believe that a consolidated national servicing standard, if developed in a cooperative manner, could stimulate much needed reform of a residential mortgage loan servicing system that has admittedly failed a great number of consumers during the recent foreclosure crisis,” MBA President David Stevens said during testimony earlier this month before Congress. Meanwhile, the Federal Reserve recently introduced a proposal that would require mortgage lenders to verify borrowers’ incomes and outstanding debt before approving a home loan. The idea is similar to the MBA supported measures: that is, create safeguards so that consumers borrow within their means and lenders make responsible loans. The Fed is currently seeking public comment on the plan. But while one half of the equation is making strides toward a solution as lenders address the folly of giving loans to people who can’t repay them, the other half of the equation is still in flux. That part of the solution will require a flexibility that allows otherwise qualified borrowers to obtain mortgages even it their finances — monthly income, credit history, outstanding debt, etc. — don’t precisely fit the rigid lending restrictions now in place. Phipps praised the new industry policies targeting “the terrible underwriting practices of the past decade that contributed to the real estate meltdown and subsequent financial crisis.”  He warned, however, that “punishing homeowners with overly stringent requirements is unnecessary and harmful.” The NAR believes U.S. home sales could potentially jump 15% — an estimated 750,000 sales in 2010 — if lending standards were relaxed just a bit. Industry experts are virtually unanimous in their belief that uniform standards for underwriters would benefit the mortgage industry (and ultimately the housing market), but uniform standards for borrowers do not. In fact, that’s already proving to be true. Patty Raymo, chief operating officer at Mortgage Master, a large Massachusetts-based residential mortgage lender, said stringent uniform lending standards, for the most part set by secondary market investors rather than the actual lenders, are excluding many qualified home buyers. Raymo cited the tough guidelines used by automated underwriting engines to determine if a borrower is qualified. Lenders plug a potential borrower’s financial data into these engines, and the software removes any human element of the decision making process. “In today’s world you can either get a loan or you can’t. There’s no gray area,” said Raymo. “The pendulum has definitely swung.” Consider, for example, debt ratio standards now required by the automated underwriting engines. Currently, a potential borrower’s debt ratio can’t exceed 45% of their gross monthly income. If the debt ratio falls “outside of that box,” in the parlance of the mortgage industry, the borrower’s application is automatically rejected. In the past, “common sense lending” allowed a lending officer to review a file and formulate their own decision. That process went awry during the housing boom, but now it has become overly restrictive. “It’s probably the most frustrating it’s been since I’ve been in the business. You see a loan that makes sense but it can’t get done because it doesn’t fit into the box. The automated underwriting engine probably  wouldn’t allow it, so you can’t do it. It would be nice if we get back to a point where we were able to make a decision outside that box,” said Raymo. The reason those boxes are so inflexible is that the secondary market for mortgages comprised of the big Wall Street investment banks — Citigroup (NYSE:C), Bank of America (NYSE:BAC), JPMorgan (NYSE:JPM) and Wells Fargo (NYSE:WFC) among them — are still healing from the collapse of the subprime mortgage market and remain extremely skittish toward risk. The big banks have made it clear to the lenders on the front lines of the mortgage industry — Mortgage Master, for example — that if a loan doesn’t pass their muster they won’t buy it. Consequently, if the big Wall Street banks won’t buy a loan the lenders won’t approve it. Raymo said she expects the big banks will eventually become less risk averse. “Eventually they will loosen up and there will be a balance but it’s going to take some time because everyone is still digging out from the mess that occurred,” she said.

Read the full article →

WATCH: Arianna Huffington Says ‘Job’s Issue Is A Demand Issue’

July 25, 2011

Politicians in Washington have yet to reach an agreement to raise the debt ceiling . Many other Americans have other concerns. Last night on ABC’s This Week with Christiane Amanpour , Huffington Post Media Group Editor-In-Chief Arianna Huffington, senior correspondent for FOX Business Network Charlie Gasparino, former Clinton Budget Director Alice Rivlin and journalist George Will sat down to debate the question on the minds of many Americans: What’s more important — the federal deficit or the jobs deficit? Polls continue to indicate that Americans say jobs is the more important issue facing America . The roundtable discussion on This Week , however, painted a more complicated picture. And while Charlie Gasparino says an agreement over the federal deficit might allay the hiring fears of small businesses, Arianna Huffington says the primary hurdle facing the jobs crisis is the lack of demand. “The jobs issue is a demand issue,” Huffington said. “Corporate America has $2 trillion dollars in cash they are not spending, corporate profits are up 60 percent, the problem is not the lack of cash, the problem is not that [businesses] can’t borrow money at very reasonable rates.” “The problem is [businesses] don’t trust demand,” Huffington continued. “By capping spending we’re going to make demand even weaker.” Watch the debate on the jobs and federal deficit question on “This Week”:

Read the full article →

Bradley Horowitz Named to Wordnik Board; Wordnik Raises $8 Million in Series C Funding

July 25, 2011

Horowitz Accepts First Board Appointment; New and Existing Investors Support Wordnik as It Takes Innovative Word/Context Discovery Capability to the Marketplace

Read the full article →

Wulf von Schimmelmann Joins Thomson Reuters Board

July 25, 2011

NEW YORK, NY–(Marketwire – Jul 25, 2011) – Thomson Reuters ( NYSE : TRI ) ( TSX : TRI ), the world’s leading source of intelligent information for businesses and professionals, today announced the appointment of Wulf von Schimmelmann (64) to the company’s Board of Directors.

Read the full article →

Online Room Rental Startup Airbnb Scores $112 Million in Financing

July 25, 2011

(Reuters) – Airbnb, a website that lets travelers rent rooms in private homes around the globe, has secured $112 million in a second round of financing from Andreessen Horowitz, DST Global and General Catalyst. Airbnb co-founder Joe Gebbia said the new financing will help the company expand internationally and open new offices. Gebbia and his roommate Brian Chesky founded Airbnb — or “Air bed-and-breakfast” — in 2008 after renting out air mattresses in their apartment to people attending a San Francisco design conference. The three-year-old website, which garners 30 million page views a month, matches travelers looking to rent a temporary space — from a room in a New York City apartment to a villa in France — with homeowners looking to pad their earnings or fill a short-term vacancy. Airbnb, which now has total funding of $119.8 million, offers listings in more than 16,000 cities in 186 countries. “Growth has been flat-out explosive, with over 2 million room nights already booked,” Andreessen Horowitz general partner Jeff Jordan said. Venture capital investments are on the rebound. VC firms raised $2.7 billion in the second quarter, an increase of 28 percent from a year earlier, according to data from Thomson Reuters and the National Venture Capital Association. But the fund-raising was spread across just 37 firms, continuing a trend of VC investment concentrating in a handful of more influential outfits such as Andreessen Horowitz. The concentration on fewer start-ups is pushing up valuations, industry experts say. During the 2010 second quarter, 48 firms raised $2.1 billion. (Reporting by Edwin Chan; editing by John Wallace) Copyright 2011 Thomson Reuters. Click for Restrictions .

Read the full article →

Poll Shows Where Voters Stand On Debt Ceiling Dispute

July 25, 2011

WASHINGTON — Just last fall, Americans were feeling better about their personal finances. Now they’re starting to worry more about how they’ll pay off debts as they feel the nation’s economic recovery wobbling. With Congress deadlocked over how to deal with the national debt, household debt is causing stress for nearly half the country, according to a new Associated Press-GfK poll. One in five adults worries about debt most or all of the time. If they bought something on a credit card in the past month, more than a third say they won’t pay it off when the bill comes. The increased stress represents a reversal from last fall’s AP-GfK poll, which found increasing confidence about personal finances. Debt-related stress is up 17 percent from that November survey, bumping such worries back up to levels seen in 2009 and in the spring of last year. “It’s not that our debt is huge. It’s just hard to make it, month to month,” said Theresa Telford, 45, a teacher’s aide raising four kids with her husband, a sheriff’s deputy. “It seems like everything is going up, but wages aren’t going up.” Telford is also nervous because she’s watched so many people lose their jobs in her small town of Davenport, Wash., and some of her friends still can’t find work. Although the recession officially ended in June 2009, Americans display little faith in a recovery hobbled by grinding unemployment, slow economic growth, volatile gasoline and food prices and political feuding over how to stem the skyrocketing national debt. Consumer confidence fell to a seven-month low in June in the Conference Board’s survey. “We’re starting to be fearful again that things may fall apart,” said Paul J. Lavrakas, a research psychologist and AP consultant who analyzed the survey. Lavrakas and other researchers have found that debt can be bad for the health as well as the wallet. Those suffering the most anxiety over their debt are at risk for stress-related illnesses, such as ulcers, depression or heart attacks. The poll found that households earning more than $75,000 had the biggest increase in debt-related stress since November. But stress levels continue to be highest within the most vulnerable groups: households that have lost jobs, people with family incomes below $20,000, single parents, and adults without high school diplomas. Married moms and adults under 30 years old showed significantly more anxiety than in the fall. In all, more than 40 million Americans are feeling serious stress over the money they owe, whether it’s for credit cards, mortgages, car loans or other debts, the poll indicates. It’s a tough period for high school dance instructor James J. Moran of Shelton, Conn. He doesn’t get paid during summer break, except for the occasional dancing or acting jobs he lands. “For three months I scrape by and I can only afford to make the minimum payments on my credit cards,” said Moran, who owes more than $5,000 on his cards and about $14,000 in student loans. “I put more toward the debts when I can, but when I can’t that’s when I really worry.” The news isn’t all bleak. Although it ticked upward, the Debt Stress Index based on the AP-GfK poll came in at 29.2, still within the range considered moderately low. Most people say they are handling their credit cards well in lean times. Nine out of 10 people with credit cards say they trust themselves to handle debt. Most say they use credit cards because they’re more convenient than cash. About half say they charge only what they can afford to pay for at the end of the month. “Am I going off and buying things right now? No,” said Donald Doane, 53, of Duluth, Minn. Doane said he carries “a little debt but nothing I can’t handle” on a low-interest credit card that he reserves for emergencies and big purchases. A salesman for Savories Catering in Duluth, Minn., Doane tracks the economy by how much his customers spend on wedding receptions and office parties. “People are spending,” he said, “it’s just that they’re being more frugal.” Americans have been borrowing less and saving more in response to the Great Recession and its aftermath. Credit card borrowing increased in May, only the second monthly gain since August 2008, according to the Federal Reserve’s latest figures. The total is still down 18.5 percent from its peak in August 2008. The AP-GfK poll put median credit card debt in June at $800, the same as in November. Average debt was down slightly from November at $3,200. About four in 10 people surveyed owe more than $1,000 in credit card debt. One in every 10 owes $10,000 or more. Lavrakas said the poll provides a snapshot of the typical American who’s seriously stressed by debt: a working parent, in his or her 30s or early 40s, who doesn’t have a high school diploma and is raising a family on household income of less than $20,000. Those reporting the highest stress levels were more likely than others to say they had debt due to medical bills, that their financial situation was “very poor,” that they charge things they know they cannot pay off when the bill comes and that they don’t trust themselves to manage their credit cards. They are pessimistic about the future, both because of their personal finances and the nation’s. “The most stressed people are at the lower financial tiers, and that’s just the reality of their life,” Lavrakas said. “The optimism that some of them may have had last fall didn’t pan out. They’ve sunk into being pessimistic and they have good reason to be.” Troy Clawson, a disabled former construction worker in Felsenthal, Ark., said he has been worrying more about his debts – his mortgage and car payments, medical bills for himself and his wife, and store credit cards at Wal-Mart and an auto repair shop. So Clawson, 60, is trying to be more cautious and avoid pulling out his credit cards. “I don’t really like to,” he said, “but sometimes it’s necessary when you’re in a bind.” The AP-GfK poll was conducted June 16-20 by GfK Roper Public Affairs and Corporate Communications. It involved landline and cell phone interviews with 1,001 adults nationwide, including 715 who have credit cards. Results for the full sample have a margin of sampling error of plus or minus 4.1 percentage points. ___ Associated Press writer Stacy Anderson, Polling Director Trevor Tompson, Deputy Polling Director Jennifer Agiesta and News Survey Specialist Dennis Junius contributed to this report. Online: Poll results: http://www.ap-gfkpoll.com

Read the full article →

Auto Union Wants Bigger Cut Of Detroit Success

July 25, 2011

AUBURN HILLS, Mich. (AP) — To help American carmakers stay in business, autoworkers grudgingly gave up pay raises and some benefits four years ago. Now that General Motors, Ford and Chrysler are making money again, workers want compensation for their sacrifice. Just how much they get is the central question hanging over contract talks that start this week between Detroit and one of the nation’s largest and most powerful unions. The negotiations, the first since Chrysler and GM took government aid and emerged from bankruptcy, will set wages and benefits for 111,000 members of the United Auto Workers, including those at Ford, which avoided bankruptcy by taking out massive private loans. The UAW’s four-year contracts with the Detroit Three expire on Sept. 14. There’s more at stake than pay. After the industry’s brush with financial ruin in 2008 and 2009, both sides know how quickly Detroit’s sales and profitability could vanish. Sales are on pace to reach nearly 13 million cars and trucks this year, better than the 10 million in 2009, but still below the 17 million peak in 2005. Americans are worried about buying cars when wages and the job market are weak. The workers and Detroit companies can’t leave themselves vulnerable to rivals. “Management’s not the enemy at this point,” says Jim Graham, a longtime local union president in Lordstown, Ohio, where workers make the Chevrolet Cruze car. “The enemy is the competition.” Even so, the talks won’t be easy. Chrysler, which is run by Italian automaker Fiat, wants to hold the line on wages and benefits, while GM and Ford want to cut labor costs even more. There’s friction inside the union, too. Many workers are eager to get a share of company profits and restore pay raises and some benefits given up during the financial crisis. “You want to get something back,” says Hans Smith, a worker at GM’s pickup plant in Flint, Mich., who knows they won’t get back all the concessions. That could create problems for the UAW’s new leader, Bob King, who preaches cooperation over confrontation. King wants to “make sure our members get their fair share of the upside” but also keep the companies competitive. Wall Street is watching, too. Stock prices at Ford and GM and a potential Chrysler public offering could be hurt if companies end up with higher costs. The talks started Monday at Chrysler’s Auburn Hills, Mich., headquarters with a series of friendly handshakes. Both sides wore matching maroon jackets to signal unity. Here are the key issues in the talks: — Reward for Risk: Workers want a bigger cut of the profits now that Detroit’s automakers are making money again. They got profit-sharing checks in January, but they’ll want bigger ones this year to offset the risk that they could nothing if the economy slows more and auto sales tank. They also resent the size of executive pay packages, particularly at Ford, where workers fume that Ford CEO Alan Mulally got $26.5 million for 2010. Some assembly-line workers are already mad about giving up guaranteed raises. They could resist profit-sharing. “Most workers say `No, that’s not good enough,’” says Gary Walkowicz, a Ford worker who ran unsuccessfully against King last year. “It’s like pie in the sky as opposed to real increases in wages to help us keep up with increasing prices.” The UAW’s ultimate weapon, a strike, is banned at GM and Chrysler under terms of the government bailout. The union could still strike at Ford. — Matching Rivals’ Costs: Even with big reductions in labor costs since 2007, GM and Ford still pay more in wages and benefits than Toyota, Honda and Hyundai, which don’t have unionized workers. Ford’s cost is the highest in Detroit at around $58 per hour, while Toyota’s is $55, according to the Center for Automotive Research. GM and Ford will try to cut costs further in talks this summer, while Chrysler, which has the lowest costs in Detroit, doesn’t want an increase. Still, factory wages and benefits cost the Detroit Three around $20 less an hour per worker than they did four years ago. In the last contract talks, companies got the union to form trust funds to manage the cost of their retirees’ health care. That took a huge cost off Detroit’s books once the companies gave money to the trusts. The union also agreed to lower wages for newly-hired workers, about half the $29 per hour that longtime union workers make. King says Detroit’s costs will fall as more new workers are hired. He says that the union won’t make any more financial concessions, but will look at other ways to cut costs, including health care changes, as long as members aren’t hurt. Al Iacobelli, Chrysler’s chief negotiator, says the company won’t go back to the old formula of pay raises. — Keeping U.S. Jobs: The UAW is eager to boost its ranks with more new hires. Its membership has fallen to 376,612, about a quarter of the 1.5 million it had at its peak in 1979. The companies, though, are reluctant to hire with auto sales and the economy still sputtering. King concedes that reopening plants would have to be justified by increased sales. In past years the spirit of cooperation at the start of talks quickly has turned to nastiness as both sides staked out their positions. But UAW Vice President General Holiefield says this year will be different. “We’ve come through hell and look where we’re at today,” he says. “I don’t see anything as an obstacle.”

Read the full article →

Dems: Boehner Once Backed A Debt Plan Similar To Reid’s Proposal

July 25, 2011

WASHINGTON — House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) backed a debt limit plan in the spring that sounds very much like a deal Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid will propose Monday, Democrats are pointing out. Reid (D-Nev.) is set to unveil a proposal that would cut $2.7 trillion in spending — without raising taxes — in an afternoon press conference. That sounds very much like the requirements Boehner laid out in a major speech to the Economic Club of New York on May 9. “Let me be as clear as I can,” Boehner said, as he acknowledged that many in the audience of bankers and financiers were uncomfortable with the idea of even flirting with a default on the U.S. debt. “Without significant spending cuts and reforms to reduce our debt, there will be no debt limit increase. And the cuts should be greater than the accompanying increase in debt authority the president is given,” Boehner said. “We should be talking about cuts of trillions, not just billions.” “They should be actual cuts and program reforms, not broad deficit or debt targets that punt the tough questions to the future,” he said. “And with the exception of tax hikes — which will destroy jobs — everything is on the table. That includes honest conversations about how best to preserve Medicare.” Reid’s plan may include cuts to Medicare providers , but it would spare beneficiaries. And with $2.7 in cuts, it exceeds the $2.4 trillion debt ceiling hike President Obama is seeking. But just because Boehner has backed something that sounds similar to the Reid plan before, there’s no guarantee that will back it again. Republicans have repeatedly rejected Democratic proposals over the course of the debt talks, even when they have backed the ideas behind them in the recent past. Indeed, Boehner has already signaled that he will oppose Reid’s plan , and he is slated to put forth a new proposal of his own on Monday afternoon. His plan puts the “Cut, Cap and Balance” proposal, which includes a balanced budget amendment to the U.S. Constitution, back on the table, even though it was rejected by the Senate last week . Watch Boehner’s May 9 speech here:

Read the full article →

Harlan Green: Who Will Drag Us Into the 21st Century?

July 25, 2011

Why is our government deadlocked on just about everything; unable to make decisions on financial regulations, the budget deficit and the role of government in general? Because we are locked in a battle of the centuries. Yes, we are talking about centuries of U.S. history that are seen differently by Democrats and Republicans, the young and old, and even coastal vs. Midwest and southern states. It is a struggle between those who have already entered the 21st century and those who are holding back because they are fearful of its faster pace, or have a great nostalgia for a much simpler, older America. The problem is that America has become an empire and the world’s leading super power, which costs money, to put it bluntly. And just as happened to empires of the past (British and Roman Empires come to mind), we have run up insurmountable debts that require us to relinquish some of that power to younger countries, such as India, China, and Brazil. We can no longer justify appropriating currently 25 percent of the world’s resources with just 5 percent of its population. The younger countries want what we have, in other words. And so true conservatives of all stripes are being true to their credo — prevent change; whether it is bigger government, universal health care, or climate change. While liberals in general want government to step in where private enterprise can’t or won’t — with a better social safety net, environmental protection, and above all greater income equality that has declined to pre-Great Depression levels. We actually know which states have entered the 21st century, and which haven’t. A very interesting study came out recently which analyzed the per capita ratio of passport holders in each state (via Grey’s Blog). It revealed that the states with the highest ratio of passport holders were also the states most connected with the rest of the world–whether with psychological traits such as an openness to change, higher incomes, or a higher level of education. And conversely, those states with the lowest ratio of passport holders were more isolationist, less educated, and less open to change. Which are the states with the highest ratio of passport holders? • NEW JERSEY 68.36% • ALASKA 65.01% • MASSACHUSETTS 63.42% • NEW YORK 62.47% • CALIFORNIA 60.19% • NEW HAMPSHIRE 59.39% • CONNECTICUT 58.50% • WASHINGTON 57.28% • VERMONT 56.32% • MARYLAND 56.21% The result is similar when comparing incomes. Maryland leads in median per capita income, followed by New Jersey, Connecticut, Delaware, Alaska, and Massachusetts. New York, California, and New Hampshire aren’t far behind. Conversely, Mississippi, West Virginia, Alabama, and Arkansas are at the bottom of the wealth ladder. Those states also have the highest and lowest educated workforces, respectively. Even more importantly, the most educated states have the most innovative workforce. There is a reason for it. The higher ratio passport-holding citizens have more open personality traits, such as Openness to Experience, according to studies done by Cambridge University Psychologist Jason Rentfrow and his colleagues. There are other measures of who has entered the 21st century, of course. One can say with the election of Barack Hussein Obama, African Americans have now entered the 21st century political mainstream. But until we have a female President, the feminine gender remains to some extent in the 20th century. Both African Americans and women didn’t have the right to vote until the early 20th century, after all. But there is another more fundamental change–and it is financial–that is already happening and will bring most of ‘U.S.’ into the 21st century. It is the development of a greater economic safety net, if you will, that makes it easier to judge and hedge against everyday risks; whether succeeding in a profession, or insuring the value of a home. Yale economist Robert Shiller details what to expect in a recent book, The New Financial Order, Risk in the 21st Century (Princeton U. Press, Princeton, NJ, 2003). He and Karl Case via their Macro Markets LLC are already responsible for setting up financial indexes, such as the S&P Case-Shiller Home Price Index that allows futures’ traders to index home price fluctuations and thus hedge against the future volatility of home prices. Right now we are witnessing an explosion of new information systems, payments’ systems, electronic markets, online personal financial planners,” says Dr. Shiller, “and other technologically induced economic innovations, and consequently much in our economy will be changed within just a few years. Almost all of our economy will be transformed within just a few decades.” Dr. Shiller maintains that such innovations will bring greater transparency to financial and other markets, as well as level the income and wealth playing field for average Americans who before now had little access to the new technologies that have created so much wealth. So we are joined in the eternal struggle between young and old, the present and past. Those who wish to live in this, the 21st century, will want to level the playing field of opportunity for all of ‘U.S.’, whatever our gender or ethnic origin; whether black, white, Hispanic, or Asian.

Read the full article →

Corbin Hiar: Stolen State Money: Trillions Lost Annually, Only Billions Have Been Recovered

July 25, 2011

By Corbin Hiar , iWatch News 6:00 am, July 25, 2011 The uprisings of the Arab spring have brought renewed attention to long-standing accusations that kleptocratic regimes throughout the Middle East have plundered their nations’ assets. But recovering those assets — though crucial to the future of these impoverished nations — remains a daunting challenge, according to a recently released report. Crime, corruption, and tax evasion by the global elite cost between $1 trillion and $1.6 trillion and hit poor countries especially hard, says the study, ” Barriers to Asset Recovery .” Yet in the past 15 years, only $5 billion in stolen assets have been repatriated. The report offers advice to policymakers aimed at increasing that lowly rate of return. It was produced by the Stolen Asset Recovery Initiative (StAR), a joint project of the World Bank Group and the Office on Drugs and Crime at the United Nations (U.N.). Like iWatch News’ World coverage on Facebook and get the latest news instantly. The problem, says Raymond Baker, the director of Global Financial Integrity, a Washington watchdog group, is that even in nations like Switzerland that have changed procedures and rules to reduce bank secrecy, “it’s not entirely clear” how foreign governments can get stolen assets back. The first efforts to put the spate of new rules to the test, Baker says, “will probably come from Egypt or Tunisia.” For the impoverished people of both these countries, who recently toppled long-standing authoritarian governments, the stakes are substantial.  U.S. intelligence officials estimate that deposed Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak accumulated between $1 billion and $5 billion during his 30-year reign. London’s Telegraph newspaper reported ex-Tunisian President Zine el-Abidine Ben Ali’s personal wealth at £3.5 billion.That’s the equivalent of $5.7 billion, more than an eighth of Tunisia’s annual gross domestic product . Even those estimates of ill-gotten wealth “[do] not capture… the societal costs of corruption,” the report adds. “Theft of assets by corrupt officials, often at the highest levels of government, weakens confidence in public institutions, damages the private investment climate, and divests needed funding available” for investments in public health, education, and infrastructure. And “there are many obstacles to asset recovery,” said Kevin Stephenson, a senior financial sector specialist at the World Bank and the lead author of the study, in a press release . “Not only is it a specialized legal process filled with delays and uncertainty, but there are also language barriers and a lack of trust when working with other countries.” The StAR report, released in late June, documents the few multilateral international legal instruments dispossessed governments have at their disposal. Chief among them: the U.N. Convention against Corruption, the U.N. Convention Against Transnational Organized Crime, and the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) on Money Laundering, an intergovernmental organization that develops policies to combat illegal cash flows. But they’re not worth much, according to Baker. “So you walk into a bank with those two treaties and the task force’s 40 recommendations and plunk them down, and say, ‘I want to recover money stolen by my corrupt former head of state.’ Then the banker raises his eyebrows and says, ‘You want to do what?’ ” As Baker suggests, financial institutions may be reluctant to honor international standards that are not even followed by many of the governments who seek to enforce them. The compliance rate for one important FATF recommendation is troublingly low, as the U.N. Office on Drugs and Crime pointed out in a 2009 report for the StAR Initiative. More than three-fifths of the 124 jurisdictions evaluated were not monitoring accounts held by politically powerful people. This is a challenge for regulators, even in the U.S., according to Sen. Carl Levin (D-Mich.). “Weakness in our financial regulations have allowed these [politically powerful people] to move millions of dollars into or through U.S. bank accounts, often by using shell company accounts, attorney-client accounts, escrow accounts, or other accounts, or by sending wire transfers that shoot through the system before our banks react,” he said in a 2010 hearing on international corruption. Often times, strong domestic legislation coupled with effective bilateral communication has proven to be a more powerful tool than multilateral international agreements. The report, which was largely scrubbed of specific names and jurisdictions, gives the example of a Swiss law that in 2005 allowed authorities “to declare that a former head of state, his family, and associates constituted a criminal organization” and could therefore have their property confiscated. The example sounds similar to the case of the late dictator General Sani Abacha , whose fortune was seized by the Swiss at the behest of the Nigerian government and then returned to Nigeria for use in poverty-reduction programs there. The World Bank did not respond to iWatch News’ requests for comment. The report may yet go some ways towards improving the implementation of international agreements to repatriate stolen national assets and encourage the spread of effective national legislation and cooperation. But for now Baker believes closing the loopholes that allow corrupt government officials to get away with it in the first place is more important than trying to recover what’s already been lost. For example, authorities in India, from which he he recently returned, have been “all exercised about recovering stolen money , but they’re not going to get very much. By all means, go for it,” Baker said, “but it’s far more important to curtail the outflow.” Read more investigations at iWatch News

Read the full article →

Peter S. Goodman: Republican ‘Terrorism’: Debt Ceiling Debate Are Dangerous For All

July 25, 2011

A major factor in how the United States wound up in hock to the tune of $14.3 trillion is the so-called Global War on Terror, the American jihad under which all causes have been subsumed, while niggling things like facts, the constitution and strategic objectives have been relegated to irrelevance. So it seems a tad ironic that as they attempt to square the books, the same Republicans who have so eagerly prosecuted the war on terror, running up huge deficits in the process, are now behaving like the enemies on which they have squandered so much blood and treasure: They are acting like terrorists. Yes, terrorists. A central feature of any fruitful negotiation is that both sides can reasonably assume that certain outcomes can be ruled out, chief among them the possibility that one party will resort to something so dangerous that it risks blowing everything up. Yet in threatening not to lift the debt ceiling without first extracting enormous cuts in government spending, Republicans are in essence threatening to obliterate the underpinnings of the global financial system — the bed-rock faith that, come what may, Uncle Sam always makes good. How can any rational negotiation take place in the face of such a threat? If the Republicans are serious about following through, they are either fundamentally ignorant about the workings of finance, or they are insane. Or to add a third possibility, they are courageously cynical: They are exploiting the assumption that the people they are dealing with will ultimately cave, paying whatever price is required to avert catastrophe. Act like a madman, the logic goes, and the sane people will be forced to accommodate. Meanwhile, the rest of us wait and worry and wonder what will happen, every day dominated by anxious talk that American creditors will start demanding higher interest rates on the next extension of credit, heaping fresh trouble on a stalling economy. We imagine what an American default would look like, a thought that renders the logic of global capital effectively inoperable. It would change everything — faith in the dollar, confidence in the sanctity of all debts. When everything is different, money has a way of standing still. Perhaps the Cuban missile crisis felt a little bit like this, with the crucial difference being that we are the ones stacking up the nuclear warheads and threatening to detonate them on ourselves. Obama has already rewarded extremism by signaling willingness to cut to some $3 trillion in spending from the federal budget — cuts that would tear further at the damaged fabric of the social safety net by reducing support for Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security, while adding to the drag on the economy. Which means that, whatever happens next, it’s not going to be good. Paul Krugman has it right : Either a deal gets cut and we avert financial crisis, while settling instead for the consequences of idiotic budget-cutting — the long, slow slog through elevated unemployment with no relief — or no deal happens and we find out what happens when the American Treasury slides into delinquency. Last rites have been proclaimed on civility in American politics so many times that bemoaning the state of things is a tired cliché. Yet this episode feels like the reaching of a new low, a renunciation of the most basic form of responsibility by people who were elected to pursue the national interest. The Iraq War was a disaster, an unenlightened response to the tragedy that was 9/11, and yet I’m willing to accept that the people who prosecuted that war believed that we would be safer for it, even as that has proven wrong. The deregulation of finance under the Clinton and Bush administrations produced tragic consequences. Yet there too, I am open to believing that it was a product of a flawed belief system that saturated too much of the decision-making class, a near-religious faith in the merits of laissez-faire economics. What is happening now is appalling in a wholly different way. One party is willfully and intentionally driving us to the edge of a cliff, using the national interest as a hostage. The American system is, like all systems of governance, imperfect and vulnerable to the foibles of the human beings who wield power, along with the fickle ways of the electorate. It is open to the manipulation of powerful organizations whose interests often pull in the opposite direction of the citizenry — people working stressful jobs, hauling kids to school and struggling to figure out how to pay their own bills, with little time left for keeping educated about the doings of the people who are supposed to be managing the national finances in Washington. And still the American system has proven dynamic and strong. It has weathered a civil war and two world wars. It has expanded the rights of people who have been systematically discriminated against. It has more often than not managed to balance the interests of a nation of people who are geographically scattered and separated by culture, race and religious beliefs. None of this is to dismiss the considerable injustice woven into American history, not to mention the present, but if you had to pick one way to run things off the global menu, you could do a lot worse than the American system of governance. Yet the system can only function so long as we can assume that the parties jockeying for influence will respect certain limits — that they will rule out certain tactics whose mere discussion is dangerously destabilizing. That is something we can no longer assume. One organized party is willing to threaten to lay everything to waste in the pursuit of its agenda. It is willing to court extreme danger for everyone as a means of getting its way. This is the message of the summer of 2011, a message that will remain even after some sort of unsatisfying deal is inevitably cut to avoid the prospect of default. The mindset of the terrorist has been insinuated into the practice of American policy.

Read the full article →

Special Master Sought To Oversee Oil Spill Claims, Kenneth Feinberg ‘Too Slow’

July 25, 2011

— The attorneys for people and businesses suing BP over last year’s Gulf oil spill want a federal judge to appoint a special master to oversee the claims process. They say in court papers Monday that administrator Kenneth Feinberg has been too slow to process interim payments from the $20 billion fund that BP set up to compensate people who lost their livelihoods when crude oil gushed from BP’s blown well. The payments are meant to tide people over until claims are settled. The lawyers say BP and Feinberg’s claims facility have benefited from desperate victims who choose quick one-time payments in exchange for promises not to sue. Last week, the Justice Department said an independent audit would be done to determine if claims are being processed appropriately. A message seeking comment was left with Feinberg.

Read the full article →

Nonprofit To Place Young Entrepreneurs In Poor Cities To Fuel Economy

July 25, 2011

A new nonprofit is pairing creative, eager entrepreneurs with distressed cities nationwide. Venture for America , modeled after Teach For America, is confident it can do for business what TFA has done for schools. Just as the successful education nonprofit puts high-performing college grads to work at schools in disadvantaged areas, VFA will recruit top college graduates to work for two years at business startups in hurting cities such as Detroit, New Orleans and Providence, R.I., according to Silicon Republic . The program seeks to help jumpstart the local economy starting next month through specific fields such as renewable energy development, health care innovation, nanotechnology and education. “Our goal is to have a micro-impact,” VFA president Andrew Yang told Boston Herald . “We want to be as big as possible and do as much good as possible. We want to rebuild the economy.” The grads will go to cities in groups to work at a startup. At the end of the two years, the top performer will get $100,000 in seed funding for a new business or to put toward his VFA position, according to the Herald. The young people who enroll in the program will be paid between $32,000 and $38,000 annually for two years. After that time, companies can opt to hire the VFA workers under new terms. Yang said he hopes that the college grads will end up staying in the cities where they’ve worked. “Our concrete goal is to generate 100,000 U.S. jobs by 2025,” the Herald reports. Yang also said his project should help young people coming out of college gain some direction. “The primary driver [for applicants] will be the desire to get into startups and learn how to build businesses,” he told Fast Company. “It’s not easy to find that experience out of college.”

Read the full article →

Jim Moret: Captain America Could Strike a Budget Deal

July 25, 2011

Captain Steve Rogers, best known as Captain America, is a superhero. His ideology is simple. It is not influenced by politics nor an allegiance based on lines on a map. He is driven by the principles of right over wrong. When a young, scrawny Rogers was asked by a doctor at an Army recruiting station, during the height of WWII, if he wanted to join the service so he could “kill Nazis,” his response was direct: “I just don’t like bullies.” Even when he is given superhuman strength, the Captain’s main weapon is not a gun, but a shield, as he consistently sees his duty as one of protection. I wish we had such a champion in America right now, when we clearly need one. His charge might seem worlds away from the European battlefronts portrayed in the film, leading Allied troops against Hitler’s forces. But the task here and now is no less serious on the economic front, with potentially devastating consequences to America if no agreement is reached in time to raise the debt ceiling. A critical scene in the movie shows a series of timers, counting down to the eventual self-destruction of an enemy munitions base. The situation for us is no less dire. A 1979 GAO report, cited in a recent Congressional Research Service report, stated: It is difficult to perceive all the adverse effects that a government default for even a short time would have on the economy and the public welfare. It is generally recognized that a default would preclude the government from honoring all of its obligations to pay for such things as employees’ salaries and wages; social security benefits, civil service retirement, and other benefits from trust funds; contractual services and supplies, and maturing securities…. At a minimum, however, the government could be subject to additional claims for interest on unredeemed matured debt and to claims for damages resulting from failure to make payments. But even beyond that, the full faith and credit of the U.S. government would be threatened. Domestic money markets, in which government securities play a major role, could be affected substantially. Precious days and minutes are being wasted as Congress and the President remain at an impasse over raising the debt limit. That decision has been made time and again by various administrations. According to the Congressional Research Service, the limit has been raised 74 times since 1962 and 10 of those times have been since 2001. Raising the limit has now been tied to lines in the sand drawn by both sides of the aisle. Where has that political brinksmanship gotten us? Both S&P and Moody’s have already threatened to downgrade the credit rating of the United States. Overseas markets and Wall Street alike are becoming increasingly nervous that an agreement may not be reached after all. Economists have warned of dire financial and political consequences but even that has not been enough to avoid an 11th hour showdown. The millions of Americans who have been struggling to find work, keep their homes and support their families, and the millions more who are for the first time in a generation worried about their financial futures and those of their children, are looking for a real hero to save them. To the president and members of Congress, I ask a simple question: “What would Steve Rogers do?” He was once a “little guy” who became a larger than life hero, but who never forgot his roots. He respected his new-found strength and responsibility and used his power to fight to protect others, even if that meant sacrificing himself. Captain America may be based on a comic book, but our elected leaders could learn a lot from him about honor, service and doing the right thing.

Read the full article →

Lawmakers split as debt deadline looms

July 25, 2011

By Andy Sullivan and Rick Cowan WASHINGTON (Reuters) – Lawmakers were locked in a standoff on Monday over dueling debt plans that offered little prospect for compromise, increasing the threat of a ratings downgrade and default that could sow chaos in global markets. Little more than a week before the August 2 deadline to raise the $14.3 trillion U.S. debt ceiling, President Barack Obama’s Democrats and their Republican rivals pursued separate budget proposals, with no clear path to bring them together. The impasse rattled investors worldwide, sending stocks and the dollar down and pushing gold to a record high, but falling far short of the panicky sell-off that some politicians in Washington had feared after weekend talks broke down. Market players warned of the prospects for a greater alarm and a downgrade of the United States’ gold-plated AAA rating if the debt stalemate goes down to the wire. The International Monetary Fund urged swift U.S. action on its debt problems to avert negative fallout globally. “If politicians don’t find a solution right now, we are facing a disaster of major proportions,” said Fidelio Tata, head of U.S. rates strategy at SG Corporate & Investment Banking in New York. The Dow Jones industrial average, the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index and the Nasdaq Composite Index were all down less than half a percent in mid-day trading. Obama and congressional leaders have tried to reassure global markets that the country will be able to service its debt and meet other obligations after August 2, when the Treasury Department says the United States will run out of money to pay all of its bills. Ratings agencies have warned that even if Congress raises the debt ceiling and averts a default, they may still strip the United States of its AAA credit rating if lawmakers fail to agree on deeper long-term budget cuts. THREAT TO CREDIT RATING A lower credit rating could raise borrowing costs not only for the U.S. government but also for other countries, companies and consumers because U.S. Treasuries are the benchmark by which many loans are measured. Faced with such dire prospects, top lawmakers set a Monday deadline to show markets a plan. Republicans, driven by the fiscally conservative Tea Party movement that helped them win control of the House of Representatives last November, strongly oppose tax increases. Democrats who control the Senate dislike proposed cuts to popular social programs and want some tax increases in addition to spending cuts. The House and Senate appeared to be heading for a showdown as their leaders developed competing plans to resolve the crisis. Critics said both sides appeared more interested in scoring political points than forging compromise as the 2012 election campaign gathers steam. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, a Democrat, aims to raise the debt ceiling by $2.7 trillion, enough to cover the country’s borrowing needs through the November 2012 elections. That would be paired with an equal amount in spending cuts over 10 years — short of the $4 trillion in deficit savings that experts say would be necessary to keep debt at a sustainable level. Republican House Speaker John Boehner’s plan would raise the debt limit in stages, forcing Congress to confront the politically painful issue again before the election. His plan could potentially deliver bigger budget savings through an overhaul of the tax code and a reform of expensive health benefits that are expected to balloon over the coming decade. Boehner has promised more details on his approach when he meets House Republicans at 2 p.m. (1800 GMT). Amid sharp partisan divisions, the International Monetary Fund said on Monday the United States must raise the debt ceiling quickly and get its debts under control for the sake of the global economy. U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton sought to reassure Asia, which holds close to $3 trillion in U.S. government debt, that the United States would reach a deal and avoid default. “I’m confident that Congress will do the right thing and secure a deal on the debt ceiling and work with President Obama to take the steps necessary to improve our long-term fiscal outlook,” she said in a speech in Hong Kong. Germany added its voice to those expecting U.S. lawmakers to reach a compromise, although elsewhere there were signs of frustration. Should the impasse in Congress prove unbreakable for raising the debt ceiling, Obama still has a constitutional escape hatch at his disposal, although he has expressed reluctance to resort to it. He could bypass lawmakers and invoke a little-known clause of the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, which states that the United States’ public debt “shall not be questioned.” (Additional reporting by Richard Cowan in Washington, Ryan Vlastelica in New York, Emily Kaiser in Singapore, Yoo Choonsik in Seoul; Editing by Will Dunham)

Read the full article →

Food inflation in focus amid lofty crop price outlook

July 25, 2011

By Karl Plume CHICAGO (Reuters) – Grain prices will likely remain elevated at the end of this year, a Reuters poll showed, providing little relief to food prices while continuing to challenge policymakers battling to tamp down inflation. Many analysts say the era of cheap food may well be over as rising crop production struggles to keep pace with soaring global demand, particularly from the mushrooming middle-class populations of developing nations such as China and India. But experts do not expect a repeat of the late-year grain market rallies of 2010 which ignited record food inflation that stirred popular unrest in the Middle East and North Africa, toppling governments in Egypt and Tunisia. The U.N. Food and Agriculture Organization’s index of food prices hit a record peak in February, creating fears of a repeat of the 2007/08 global food crisis that prompted food riots and forced millions into hunger. Governments have progressively taken steps to rein in soaring costs for staples that disproportionately impact the world’s poor, including the systemic releases of state grain stocks in China and the construction of grain silos in India. Much will hinge on weather in the U.S. Farm Belt this summer as near-perfect crop conditions are needed in the world’s top grain exporter to soothe markets on edge over shrinking stockpiles of corn and soybeans and rapidly rising demand for food. Debt problems in Europe and the United States will also play a role. If left unresolved, they could tip the world into another recession like the one that eroded grain prices beginning in late 2008. CORN SEEN RISING Prices of corn — a cornerstone of the food chain that impacts the cost of meat, milk, and eggs — are forecast to end 2011 at $6.89 per bushel, about 10 percent higher than a year earlier but short of June’s all-time high of nearly $8. At midmorning on Monday, spot corn futures on the Chicago Board of Trade were down about 2 percent at $6.75 a bushel. Strong demand from livestock and ethanol producers and concern over crop yields in the United States, the world’s largest producer and exporter, would lead to the third consecutive annual increase in corn prices. “I generally look for relatively high prices come year’s end with no major harvest correction,” said PFG Best analyst Tim Hannagan, referring to corn. “All end-users of grain such as ethanol producers, feeders, food processors and exporters will be aggressive buyers at harvest time to ensure they have their share of inventory as insurance for expected tight stocks and strong demand in 2012,” Hannagan said. Soybeans, which are crushed to produce soymeal, also a livestock feed, and soyoil used for cooking and to make biodiesel fuel, were seen at $13.92 a bushel at the end of the year, near 2010′s lofty close of $13.94. Soyoil prices themselves were seen rising about 3 percent year-on-year at 59.73 cents per lb, according to the average analyst forecast. Spot CBOT soybeans fell at midmorning on Monday to $13.55 a bushel while soyoil slid to 55.45 cents per lb, both down nearly 2 percent. The wild card for corn and soy prices may be China, the world’s top soybean importer and an emerging importer of corn, as policymakers there walk the line between red-hot economic growth and soaring inflation. “Both corn and soybeans have potential to go substantially higher if Chinese growth stays on track to provide firm demand. However, it may take time for that demand to develop, especially because China has shown the ability to be patient and buy only at lower price levels,” said Bryce Knorr, senior editor of Farm Futures Magazine. Wheat, a food staple grown in nearly every country around the world, was forecast to ease to $7.53 a bushel, down about 5 percent from the prior year as global stocks rebound following a severe drought last year in key exporter Russia and neighboring countries. But experts warned that wheat’s downside may be limited as cattle, hog and poultry producers around the world increasingly use it as an alternative feed grain instead of costly corn. Spot CBOT wheat futures fell about 2.5 percent on Monday to $6.73 per bushel. (Additional reporting by KT Arasu, Sam Nelson, Julie Ingwersen, Mark Weinraub and Michael Hirtzer; Editing by Dale Hudson)

Read the full article →

Agencies look for credit rating alternatives

July 25, 2011

By Dave Clarke WASHINGTON (Reuters) – Banking regulators expect to release proposals for replacing the work of credit rating agencies in their regulations later this year when comprehensive tougher capital standards are unveiled, the Federal Reserve said on Monday. Credit rating agencies, such as Moody’s Corp and McGraw-Hill Cos’ Standard & Poor’s, have been criticized for fueling the 2007-2009 financial crisis by assigning gold-plated ratings to securities that proved to be far more risky than advertised. In response, the 2010 Dodd-Frank financial oversight law requires regulators to strip from their regulations the reliance on credit rating agencies’ work to determine such things as capital requirements for banks based on the riskiness of their assets. Despite the criticisms leveled, credit rating agencies continue to play a major role in financial markets. For instance, they are now at the center of the debate over raising the U.S. debt ceiling because of the possibility the agencies will downgrade the United States’ prized Triple-A rating if a significant deficit reduction deal is not reached. In a report to Congress released on Monday, the Fed said that banking agencies are still working to find alternatives to the credit raters’ work, a task that has proven to be difficult. The Fed said regulators expect to propose alternatives when they unveil rules for implementing tougher capital requirements for banks required by Dodd-Frank and the recent international agreement known as Basel III. These rules are expected as early as this summer. In August 2010, the Fed, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency sought input on what could replace the work of credit raters, but the responses provided no easy answers. Acting Comptroller of the Currency John Walsh has pushed for Congress to revisit the ban to at least allow the use of their work in some instances. He and other regulators have warned it will be difficult to implement new, tougher capital standards for banks without some relief from the ban. In its report, the Fed said it identified 46 references to credit rating agencies in its rules, most of which dealt with capital requirements. Congress is unlikely to soften the ban because any legislation making a change to Dodd-Frank will likely become embroiled in larger fights over the law between Republicans and Democrats. (Reporting by Dave Clarke; Editing by Matthew Lewis and Tim Dobbyn)

Read the full article →

Carly Fiorina Joins the Foundation for Health Coverage Education’s Advisory Board

July 25, 2011

SAN JOSE, CA–(Marketwire – Jul 25, 2011) – Carly Fiorina, the former Hewlett-Packard (HP) CEO and 2010 U.S. Senate candidate for California, has joined the Advisory Board of the Foundation for Health Coverage Education (FHCE) ( www.CoverageForAll.org ), a San Jose, California-based non-profit organization with a mission to assist Americans with identifying their public and private health coverage options through simplified eligibility information.

Read the full article →

VIDEO: Trade and Development Bank of Mongolia President Randolph Koppa Speaks With Frontier Securities at Mongolia: Capital Raising and Investment Conference

July 25, 2011

VIDEO: Trade and Development Bank of Mongolia President Randolph Koppa Speaks With Frontier Securities at Mongolia: Capital Raising and Investment Conference

Read the full article →

VIDEO: Quam Asset Management (HKG:0952) Chief Executive Officer Richard Harris Speaks With Frontier Securities at Mongolia: Capital Raising and Investment Conference

July 25, 2011

VIDEO: Quam Asset Management (HKG:0952) Chief Executive Officer Richard Harris Speaks With Frontier Securities at Mongolia: Capital Raising and Investment Conference

Read the full article →

VIDEO: Hera Holding General Manager Peter J. Duhaime Speaks With Frontier Securities at Mongolia: Capital Raising and Investment Conference

July 25, 2011

VIDEO: Hera Holding General Manager Peter J. Duhaime Speaks With Frontier Securities at Mongolia: Capital Raising and Investment Conference

Read the full article →

BPH Energy Limited (ASX:BPH) Announce Key HLS5 Cancer Role Report

July 25, 2011

BPH Energy Limited (ASX:BPH) Announce Key HLS5 Cancer Role Report

Read the full article →

Drillsearch Energy Limited (ASX:DLS) Bauer-1 Oil Exploration Well Spuds

July 25, 2011

Drillsearch Energy Limited (ASX:DLS) Bauer-1 Oil Exploration Well Spuds

Read the full article →

US Debt Ceiling Talks Move in Wrong Direction; Weighs on Sentiment

July 25, 2011

US Debt Ceiling Talks Move in Wrong Direction; Weighs on Sentiment

Read the full article →

Dollar Index Setting Up For Further Losses Toward 9350

July 25, 2011

Dollar Index Setting Up For Further Losses Toward 9350

Read the full article →

FOREX: Swiss Franc Outperforms as US Debt Impasse Unnerves Markets

July 25, 2011

FOREX: Swiss Franc Outperforms as US Debt Impasse Unnerves Markets

Read the full article →

Debt Dilemma Triggers Risk Aversion Behavior

July 25, 2011

Debt Dilemma Triggers Risk Aversion Behavior

Read the full article →

EURUSD: Waiting for Sell Entry Signal

July 25, 2011

EURUSD: Waiting for Sell Entry Signal

Read the full article →

Oil Sold as US Debt Fears Sink Sentiment, Gold Up on Safety Demand

July 25, 2011

Oil Sold as US Debt Fears Sink Sentiment, Gold Up on Safety Demand

Read the full article →