July 2011

Uncertainy Carries Over into New Week; Franc to Fresh Record Highs

July 25, 2011

Uncertainy Carries Over into New Week; Franc to Fresh Record Highs

Read the full article →

Dollar May Find Lifeline in US Debt Impasse, Global Slowdown Fears

July 25, 2011

Dollar May Find Lifeline in US Debt Impasse, Global Slowdown Fears

Read the full article →

S&P 500 Chart Setup Still Broadly Bearish, Offering Hope to US Dollar

July 25, 2011

S&P 500 Chart Setup Still Broadly Bearish, Offering Hope to US Dollar

Read the full article →

China’s Alibaba to reveal its mobile operating system, smartphone

July 25, 2011

China’s Alibaba to reveal its mobile operating system, smartphone

Read the full article →

BP still recovering Mexico disaster

July 25, 2011

BP still recovering Mexico disaster

Read the full article →

Goldman Sachs to buy 26.47% of Aksa Enerji

July 25, 2011

Goldman Sachs to buy 26.47% of Aksa Enerji

Read the full article →

Caterpillar Q2 net earnings USD1.02b

July 25, 2011

Caterpillar Q2 net earnings USD1.02b

Read the full article →

Colombia’s Ecopetrol to sell USD1.4b stocks

July 25, 2011

Colombia’s Ecopetrol to sell USD1.4b stocks

Read the full article →

Singapore inflation accelerating on food, housing costs

July 25, 2011

Singapore inflation accelerating on food, housing costs

Read the full article →

France’s debts to grow by USD21.59b by 2014

July 25, 2011

France’s debts to grow by USD21.59b by 2014

Read the full article →

UK home prices down 3.9%

July 25, 2011

UK home prices down 3.9%

Read the full article →

Anglo American Platinum scores 20% rise in profit

July 25, 2011

Anglo American Platinum scores 20% rise in profit

Read the full article →

Moody’s cuts Greece’s credit rating 3 levels

July 25, 2011

Moody’s cuts Greece’s credit rating 3 levels

Read the full article →

Australian Producer Price rises 0.8% in the second quarter of 2011

July 25, 2011

Australian Producer Price rises 0.8% in the second quarter of 2011

Read the full article →

Asian Activities Report for July 25, 2011: Agri Energy Limited (ASX:AAE) Commences Drilling First Well in Syria

July 25, 2011

Asian Activities Report for July 25, 2011: Agri Energy Limited (ASX:AAE) Commences Drilling First Well in Syria

Read the full article →

Australian Dollar Mildly Strengthens on as-expected PPI

July 25, 2011

Australian Dollar Mildly Strengthens on as-expected PPI

Read the full article →

Dollar rebound hinges on US debt deal: Report

July 25, 2011

Dollar rebound hinges on US debt deal: Report

Read the full article →

Buy CHF/JPY Above 97.273

July 25, 2011

Buy CHF/JPY Above 97.273

Read the full article →

Channel Top, Declining RSI Point to AUD/CAD Short Scalp

July 25, 2011

Channel Top, Declining RSI Point to AUD/CAD Short Scalp

Read the full article →

New Zealand trade balance narrows in May as the nation’s exports retreat

July 25, 2011

New Zealand trade balance narrows in May as the nation’s exports retreat

Read the full article →

New Zealand Dollar Falls as Trade Data Miss Expectations

July 25, 2011

New Zealand Dollar Falls as Trade Data Miss Expectations

Read the full article →

U.S. Dollar Index Drifts as Debt Debates Risk Further Losses

July 25, 2011

U.S. Dollar Index Drifts as Debt Debates Risk Further Losses

Read the full article →

Austin Exploration Limited (ASX:AKK) Sold Farm-In Option in Seychelles to Focus On Developing USA Shale Assets

July 25, 2011

Austin Exploration Limited (ASX:AKK) Sold Farm-In Option in Seychelles to Focus On Developing USA Shale Assets

Read the full article →

VIDEO: MonAtom LLC Director Tsogtsaikhan Gombo Speaks With Frontier Securities at Mongolia: Capital Raising and Investment Conference

July 25, 2011

VIDEO: MonAtom LLC Director Tsogtsaikhan Gombo Speaks With Frontier Securities at Mongolia: Capital Raising and Investment Conference

Read the full article →

VIDEO: Credit Suisse (VTX:CSGN) Director Nicholas Denny Speaks With Frontier Securities at Mongolia: Capital Raising and Investment Conference

July 25, 2011

VIDEO: Credit Suisse (VTX:CSGN) Director Nicholas Denny Speaks With Frontier Securities at Mongolia: Capital Raising and Investment Conference

Read the full article →

Atlas Iron Limited (ASX:AGO) and FerrAus Limited (ASX:FRS) Provide Transaction Update on Share Subscription and Iron Ore Assets Acquisition

July 25, 2011

Atlas Iron Limited (ASX:AGO) and FerrAus Limited (ASX:FRS) Provide Transaction Update on Share Subscription and Iron Ore Assets Acquisition

Read the full article →

VIDEO: American Appraisal Group Director Advisory Services Thomas Eastling Speaks With Frontier Securities at Mongolia: Capital Raising and Investment Conference

July 25, 2011

VIDEO: American Appraisal Group Director Advisory Services Thomas Eastling Speaks With Frontier Securities at Mongolia: Capital Raising and Investment Conference

Read the full article →

Focus Minerals Limited (ASX:FML) Inaugural Drilling Program At Treasure Island Confirms Discovery Of A New Gold Camp

July 25, 2011

Focus Minerals Limited (ASX:FML) Inaugural Drilling Program At Treasure Island Confirms Discovery Of A New Gold Camp

Read the full article →

South Boulder Mines Limited (ASX:STB) Continues to Intersect Shallow Potash at Area B

July 25, 2011

South Boulder Mines Limited (ASX:STB) Continues to Intersect Shallow Potash at Area B

Read the full article →

Simon Dixon: Why You Will Have No Job Very Soon

July 25, 2011

It is my forecast that in the future you will not be able to find a job in your company because more and more ’things’ will be free.  Crazy, I know, but hear me out. We are living today, in what I call a free economy. The free economy is a trend that has gone out of control.  It started as a marketing strategy, then it became essential for all businesses, and now it will ultimately cost you your job. While many think todays high unemployment is a knock on from the recession, there is also a knock on worse than the recession in the form of the free economy. What used to be a trend has become the only way to engage customers today. Today, every bank or financial institution has to offer customers great free products, I call it ‘free bait’, to stand a chance at engaging a customer — think free software, free trials, free reports,  free smart phone apps, free videos etc. etc. As more and more ‘things’ become free, companies compete with each other to offer more and more for free, until they are offering their core service for free. As more becomes free, companies find ways to cut costs so they can offer their ‘things’ for free to compete.  The only way they can do this is by replacing your job with technology and computers, innovated by freelance contractors and run by outsourced teams, as we see all around us today. How did we get here?  The internet. With the rise of cloud computing, the price of bandwidth and storage dropping fast, the ‘free economy’ has become a movement for every industry. In fact my guess, is that right now you and your team are working on the very technology that will replace your job. As soon as you get it working smoothly, you will be offered a job as a contractor over the next ten years or so. Drastic, I know, but take a look at the trends. In order to give all this stuff away for free, companies need to produce their free goods at minimal costs. This means everything going digital. Virtually every product or industry that touches digital networks, quickly feels the effect of falling costs, but only when they figure out how to do it without the huge cost of staff. Facebook has 700 million customers and only 2000 staff and you don’t expect any level of customer service from them because it is free. So one by one, they are replacing staff with technology at a rapid rate as they automate their free offering. As the digital marketplace has become global, it has become common practice for businesses to give away some of their very best stuff for free (and lots of it), while ingeniously  developing a way to compete with others who want to give away higher and higher value innovations for free and still have a business – think Google and Facebook. So in the future you will work freelance as a contractor, as part of an outsourced team or as an entrepreneur yourself serving a niche audience, centered around the years of experience you have built up. My advice: start now, build your client base, develop your offer and start preparing your contacts for when you lose your job. Remember, as you become a contractor, you have to give away your services for free to stand any chance of attracting a customer in the free economy. Could we really live in a world where all services are outsourced and contracted?  Love to hear your thoughts…

Read the full article →

Edward J. Black: Lack of Wireless Competition Threatens Tech, Start-Ups

July 25, 2011

The success of tech companies and startups increasingly depends on the industry that allows them to reach customers — wireline and wireless Internet access providers. But AT&T’s aggressive proposal to takeover T-Mobile could have not a ripple, but a tsunami impact on businesses in the Internet ecosystem — and ultimately the economy. Unless antitrust authorities in Washington step up to block this anti-competitive merger, the nation would go backwards to 1993 — when we had two big wireless carriers. History is clear: before the Department of Justice split up Ma Bell in 1984 for blocking competitors, AT&T delayed any innovation disrupting its business model — including fax machines, cellular technology and the Internet itself. It’s ironic that AT&T is proposing to reassert dominance over the very business it once delayed — wireless phone and broadband service. Businesses from mobile applications to handsets would need to seek permission to innovate from either AT&T or Verizon in sort of game of “mother (or Ma) may I?” The proposed AT&T merger is a threat to the business model and shareholder value of every mobile Internet startup and emerging player expecting open access to the wireless Internet. Past innovations like the Android phone may not have been introduced if the wireless market was a duopoly. Industry leaders need to speak up. Apps makers already spend considerable time and expense in technical qualifications before they can be seriously considered to run on a carrier’s network. With less competition in the wireless Internet space, they will find themselves in shotgun weddings with either AT&T or Verizon, holding representation deals for the apps to be available exclusively to one carrier. Handset makers may need to offer AT&T and Verizon the best, newest innovations exclusively. Without similar offerings, Sprint, smaller carriers and newer wireless network entrants will fall further behind. Before LinkedIn’s public offering in May, its Securities and Exchange Commission filing listed reasons the business could falter. It noted that as more people access the Internet online, “our business could be adversely affected” if LinkedIn were blocked from a device, or users didn’t like the company’s mobile app. Another key risk for tech companies tied to this auction is it would delay overall solutions to the “spectrum crunch.” The coming spectrum crunch would make it harder for customers to access mobile apps and content they want. AT&T or Verizon can use spectrum as a reason to block apps that they claim use too much spectrum. AT&T initially intended to block YouTube from the iPhone, but Steve Jobs’ power of persuasion broke the impasse. The proposed takeover would give AT&T significantly more spectrum than any other carrier. Thus, the least efficient network would control the greatest concentration of wireless spectrum resources. The company has warehoused much of its spectrum — instead of innovatively building out more capacity for more customers. The future ability of tech companies here to reach customers across the Internet will be significantly impacted by the FCC and the Justice Department’s decision in Washington to approve or deny the merger. We need our industry’s leaders to not let ignorance, apathy, timidity or parochial miscalculation lull them into silence during this critical economic crossroads for our industry — and the nation’s economy.

Read the full article →

HuffPost Radio: Both Sides Now: Boehner’s Food Fight, Murdoch’s Schadenfreude Pie, Warren’s Just Desserts

July 25, 2011

By Mark Green All sides agree that this week feels like a sequel to Groundhog Day , with Boehner and Murdoch playing Bill Murray’s role. Is Warren prevailing in her fights? Has Murdoch stopped losing? Is all this giving Michele Bachmann a headache? (Listen to entire show below.) *On Creation of the CFPB and Warren’s ‘Fighting’ Stance. This week is the official start of the Consumer Finance Protection Bureau. Though Liberal heroine Elizabeth Warren thinks it up and organizes it, President Obama passes her over for the top appointment. Why? And could this slight mean that she will now run for Senate instead back in Massachusetts against Scott Brown? Mary Matalin acknowledges that “capitalism becomes cannibalism” without some moral baseline but stresses Sen. Shelby’s argument that it’s too big and unaccountable. Ron Reagan pushes the Barney Frank point that it’s needed to avoid lending fraud and Republicans are afraid not that it’ll fail but that it’ll work, adding that “they, and some Democrats, are in the hip pocket of the banking industry.” Can she be an effective Senate candidate? They agree that she has the personality and drive but might not be enough of a politician to prevail. *On “Debt Ceiling” Non-Agreement… If the NFL lockout and Greece bailout are being resolved, can Washington get by its impasse without ruining American Exceptionalism? And with polls showing that congressional Republicans are being blamed far more than Obama, does the GOP risk not only economic homicide but political suicide? We first listen to the President — President Reagan — explain how dangerous and dishonorable it is for any political party to threaten America’s full faith and credit. Ron Reagan calls the Tea Party wing “childish” in the negotiations. “Nothing is stopping Congress from raising the debt ceiling and avoiding the disaster my father talked about,” as has repeatedly happened in past decades when it came to paying our past bills. Mary agrees that the ceiling has to be raised but concludes that “there’s no appetite for for lifting it without spending limits… The issue is not the deficit but runaway government and record expenditures that have risen under this President.” Is the Gang of Six a fix? Is the GOP a “cult fringe” on revenues and deficits, as Sen. Harkin asserts, or crazy like a fox since they have pulled the entire debate over to their obsession with red ink? In the House-Obama stare-down, who flinches first? They discuss the facets, with Ms. Matalin ominously adding that if Congress doesn’t adequately reduce the deficit, “it could lead to a third party.” *On Murdoch before Parliament. To quote media columnist David Carr, Murdoch was apologetic but not responsible. Did he stop the hemorrhaging? And how can he appear to have been the ruthless, hands-on Wizard of Oz for 50 years… and then the somewhat hapless man behind the curtain that day in Parliament? While Mary and Ron agree that someone at the company condoned awful misconduct, they then part ways. Mary notes that other tabloids had engaged in bad conduct and liberals were complaining more than if MSNBC had similarly sinned. We listen to Jon Stewart tease Fox for being sensitive about “piling on,” as he airs a montage of its commentators piling on NPR after it fired Juan Williams (“Is NPR an agent of jihadist inquisition?” asks one host). Mr. Reagan doubles down: “As he approaches 80, Murdoch can look back from his perch now squatting atop a giant pile of crap.” *Quick Takes: Obesity, Light Bulbs, Kucinich, Bachmann. Consensus alert — three times left and right concur here: they disagree with an obesity doctor who recommends that, in extreme cases, it’s ok to take a morbidly obese child away from a parent; they concur that it should be up to Washington State voters (Ron’s one) if congressman Dennis Kucinich tries to switch seats and states if redistricted out of his Ohio districts; and neither thinks that Rep. Michele Bachmann’s migraines should be a presidential primary issue. They agree that this seems like more of a “right-wing hit job” than a serious issue, with Ron adding, “there are millions of reasons to vote against Michele Bachmann but migraines are not among them.” They clash, however, about the House vote to repeal a Bush 43 bill to encourage more energy-efficient light bulbs — more big brother or more energy independence? After agreeing that each looks awful under the fluorescent bulbs, we change the question to — can Mary and Ron look pretty while America reduces its energy dependence on oil-producing Arab states? Mark Green is the creator and host of Both Sides Now, which is powered by the American Federation of Teachers. Send all comments to Bothsidesradio.com , where you can also listen to prior shows. Both Sides Now is available Sat. 5-6 PM EST from Lifestyle TalkRadio Network & Sun. 8-9 AM EST from Business RadioTalk Network.

Read the full article →

Robert Kuttner: Obama Holds the Cards — If He Will Play Them Well

July 25, 2011

Here are a couple of things to keep in mind as the great contrived national debt crisis enters its final week. First, the Republicans are starting to lose whatever credibility they had with the broad public, as regular people finally start focusing on this story. The economic stakes are very high, President Obama was willing to give them most of the loaf, and they still wouldn’t make a deal. Second, no matter what the White House and Speaker Boehner claim, there is no way to do a big complex budget agreement between now and next week. The details are far too complex. Even the Gang of Six proposal was nothing more than broad outlines. Third, as this drama goes down to the wire, and financial markets begin to contemplate the possibility that the United States will actually default on its debts, the pressure on the Republicans by their Wall Street allies will only grow. At some point this week, stock and bond markets will begin to start swooning, and the usual wise guys will begin making high-risk bets at the expense of financial stability as a whole. Credit rating agencies, which should be accorded zero credibility after their role in causing the financial collapse by blessing junk sub-prime securities as Triple-A, could start downgrading the debt of the United States. And then things will get really interesting. The President of the United States will be revealed to be holding more of the cards — if he has the nerve to start playing his hand well (for a change). At that point, there are only two basic choices. Either the Republicans and the White House agree to some kind of short- or medium-term increase in the debt ceiling, in exchange for some kind of deal with details to be supplied later. Or the president invokes the 14th Amendment and declares that the debts of the United States will be paid. Under the first option, the deal could include a target figure for budget cuts, perhaps with relative tax increases and spending cuts spelled out — perhaps not. It could also include some kind of “fast track” process for Congress to give the budget deal an up or down vote after the details are filled in. One of the gimmicks being discussed is for a “super-Congress” that would come back with a long-term deal for the actual Congress to vote up or down — a kind of mutant hybrid of the Bowles-Simpson Commission and the Gang of Six, on steroids. I don’t trust that end-game, because it gives too much power to all the forces of austerity that have been too dominant in this debate all year. And it creates too much risk of Democrats being stampeded to give up too much on Social Security and Medicare and get too little in the way of tax hikes on the rich in return. The New York Times had a very instructive chart today, by the indispensable Teresa Tritch, showing that most of the budget shortfall going into the financial crisis was the result of the Bush tax cuts and wars — and that most of the rest of it since 2008 was the consequence of lost revenues from the recession itself. It had very little to do with public spending. This is the kind of detail that gets lost in the contrived hysteria. My guess is that the Republicans are so intoxicated with their own negativity that they will not be able to get to yes, even though Obama keeps trying to give away the store. The House Republican Caucus, in thrall to the Tea Party, is just too locked in to the premise of no new revenues under any circumstances So then we are left with the president’s powers under the 14th Amendment, an approach that Obama seemed to rule out last week, but may need to come back to. The fact is, the ritual of Congress periodically voting to approve an increase in the national debt only dates to the World War I era. Before that, government incurred debt and rolled it over as necessary. Congress, of course, approved legislation to levy and collect taxes, but management of the public debt was the business of the executive branch. And playing cute with the debt ceiling only dates to New Gingrich in the 1990s. Before that, increases in the debt ceiling, as necessary, were entirely pro forma votes. The 14th Amendment, in Section 4 provides that “The validity of the public debt of the United States…. shall not be questioned.” Although the 14th Amendment was part of a package of Amendments intended to resolve issues left over from the Civil War, the Supreme Court has interpreted the public debt provision as giving the president very broad authority. The government can go on selling bonds to cover its costs as long as money markets accept them. Lately, the Federal Reserve has been helping that process along. Whether Congress has voted to increase the permissible amount of total debt is a technicality. It’s not as if the government runs out of money next week. If President Obama were to invoke that emergency authority to prevent the economy from collapsing as money markets began shunning U.S. government bonds, it is hard to imagine Republican leaders suing the president… to demand what? That he let the economy go off a cliff? And it is even harder to imagine the Supreme Court, even a Court as partisan and corrupted as the Roberts Court, voting to tie Obama’s hands in an economic emergency that — keep in mind — is entirely contrived. Obama, the Great Conciliator, finally showed a bit of irritation and a bit of spine this past week. It would be perverse of him to reward Republican intransigence by agreeing to an 11th hour deal that, by definition, would have to be on almost entirely Republican terms to be approved by the Tea-Party besotted House of Representatives. Better to show some leadership in an emergency, invoke the 14th Amendment, calm money markets, and leave the Republicans sputtering mad. Obama might even come to enjoy exercising leadership. Robert Kuttner is co-editor of The American Prospect and a senior fellow at Demos. His most recent book is A Presidency in Peril.

Read the full article →

Keith Harrington: No Balanced Budget Without Independence From Wall Street

July 25, 2011

“We need to balance the budget in order to grow the economy.” In the midst of the federal budget debt ceiling food fight, this may be one of the only ideas both political parties can more or less agree on. And coincidentally, it may also be one of the best examples of just how completely out of touch with economic reality both parties are. Commentary on the so-called balanced budget amendment from an array of ideologically disparate economists points out why. CNN Money quoted Norman Ornstein of the arch-conservative American Enterprise Institute as saying of the proposed Balanced Budget Amendment or BBA: It is about the most irresponsible action imaginable… It would virtually ensure that an economic downturn would end up as a deep depression, by erasing any real ability of the government to pursue countercyclical fiscal policies and in fact demanding the opposite, at the worst possible time. Then there’s the head of the Congressional Budget Office who recently told Congress: By requiring a balanced budget every year, no matter the state of the economy, such an amendment would raise serious risks of tipping weak economies into recession and making recessions longer and deeper, causing very large job losses. That’s because the amendment would force policymakers to cut spending, raise taxes, or both just when the economy is weak or already in recession — the exact opposite of what good economic policy would advise. If you’re careful enough to read between the lines here, you’ll discover a pretty stunning admission. What these experts are essentially saying is that the federal government’s inability to maintain a balanced budget isn’t rooted in excessive spending or the near impossibility of passing major revenue hikes; it emerges from the reality of a growth-focused economy that is designed to produce “business cycles” (i.e. economic bubbles and downturns) as part of its basic functioning, and that requires government bailouts and interventions to keep from seizing up after downturns occur. In other words, what makes this idea of limiting debt to grow the economy so mindbogglingly absurd is that a growth-focused economy requires increasing debt in order to function. And the debt that’s necessary to keep our economy growing at the rate mainstream economists consider “healthy” isn’t the kind your grandfather would recognize. It isn’t supported by real investments from people creating socially useful products through honest labor. It isn’t backed by actual capital reserves or bank deposits. Not even close. Maintaining 3 percent annual GDP growth requires the issuance of gargantuan levels of debt that exceed lender equity by unconscionable ratios. We’re talking trillions of phantom dollars generated out of thin air each year by private banks using nothing but a few “creative accounting” strokes. The result is a money supply that greatly exceeds the size of the real economy — i.e. the production of real goods and services, or real tangible wealth. And given that money is actually a measure of debt (i.e. the amount of real goods and services I can demand for my money) our finance-dominated, growth-focused economy is essentially a system of permanent indebtedness — one where demands on real-economy goods and services will always exceed supply. The only corrective to this problem that our current economy can provide is a devaluation of all that phantom paper wealth, otherwise known as an economic crisis. Of course, the culpability for this ridiculous system doesn’t just lie with some unscrupulous Wall-Street bankers or hedge-fund managers. On the macro level, few players do more to help promote the debt that drives the economy than the Federal government’s very own banker, the Federal Reserve. Not only does the Fed help fuel debt bubbles like the mortgage bubbles by slashing interest rates to promote borrowing (and hence debt-fueled growth), but as we’ve seen when the debt bubble pops the Fed only helps generate more debt by stepping in to bail out the banks. With all this in mind, when we look back at those expert critiques, we can see a big hole in the reasoning. We see that, in contrast to what the experts claim, there’s nothing inherently stupid about requiring that the government keep its fiscal house in order; what makes it stupid is the stupid design of our economic system — a design that actually necessitates budget imbalances through its focus on growth and generating phantom paper wealth. So the very desirable goal of creating a more or less permanently balanced budget could be achieved and should be pursued, but it’s not going to be achieved by a balanced budget amendment or increased taxation and decreased spending; it can only be achieved by a complete overhaul of the design of our economy. And a good place to start this overhaul is with the money system itself. A recent report by the Institute for Policy Studies ‘ New Economy Working Group, provides a nice framework for what such an overhaul might entail. Entitled How to Liberate America from Wall-Street Rule the report offers six key recommendations, as described by David Korten on the NEWG blog : Break up the mega-banks and implement tax and regulatory policies that favor community financial institutions, with a preference for those organized as cooperatives or as for-profits owned by nonprofit foundations. Establish state-owned partnership banks in each of the 50 states, patterned after the Bank of North Dakota. These would serve as depositories for state financial assets to use in partnership with community financial institutions to fund local farms and businesses. Restructure the Federal Reserve to function under strict standards of transparency and public scrutiny, with General Accounting Office audits and Congressional oversight. Direct all new money created by the Federal Reserve to a Federal Recovery and Reconstruction Bank rather than the current practice of directing it as a subsidy to Wall Street banks. The FRRB would have a mandate to fund essential green infrastructure projects as designated by Congress. Rewrite international trade and investment rules to support national ownership, economic self-reliance, and economic self-determination. Implement appropriate regulatory and fiscal measures to secure the integrity of financial markets and the money/banking system. The upshot here would be an economy where the money-system is designed and operated like a well-regulated public utility whose purpose is to help generate real, tangible wealth that serves the interests of Main Street and not Wall-Street. In addition to creating a more stable, equitable, less debt-dependent economy, this approach to economic restructuring is critical to helping us deal with a different type of growth-driven debt that can never be forgiven or devalued: ecological debt. Since the late 1980′s we’ve been overshooting our sustainable natural resource budget every year, and running up enormous ecological debt. According to the Global Footprint Network , our global economy currently operates at 140 percent of sustainable global carrying capacity. That means every year, our use of ecological resources and services is 40 percent higher than what the global ecosystem is able to regenerate or assimilate. The situation is a lot like government over-spending but a lot scarier, because on a finite planet there’s a real physical limit to how high we can raise the ecological debt ceiling before it all comes crashing down. To balance the ecological budget and keep future generations from paying for our over-spending we need to move to a steady-state economy . That means establishing a system where we operate our economy within a set, stable our ecological budget and do not undermine future -economic and social health by over-consuming our natural capital reserves today. In other words, our economic redesign has to involve a shift away from growing GDP to growing the real indicators of social and economic well-being: real, meaningful employment, economic opportunity, education, healthcare, strong communities, food security, cultural capital, a healthy, beautiful resilient environment, and so forth. Of course, when our politicians can’t even get real or courageous enough to admit that we need to seriously raise taxes on the wealthy or slash military spending it would seem more than a little far-fetched to imagine they would embrace this kind radical system redesign. The growth dogma is the holiest of holies and occupies a completely sacrosanct, inviolable political zone that no politician would dare trespass upon. So for the time being the federal food fight is bound to continue, as will the pursuit of false solutions based on the absurd “balanced budget = economic growth” reasoning. We’ll maintain our debt-based, growth-focused economy until the laws of nature and math bring the debt ceiling crumbling down on our heads. But we shouldn’t just sit back and wait for this to happen. While proponents of the status quo try to delay our rendezvous with reality, advocates of real solutions have to stay active and vocal in promoting the real solutions. The world needs us to vigorously educate and advocate around those solutions now so that when the first major chunks of that ceiling start to fall, we’ll have a plan to keep our civilization from being permanently flattened.

Read the full article →

Wall Street Futures, U.S. Dollar Drop With No Debt Deal In Place

July 25, 2011

NEW YORK (David Gaffen) – Wall Street futures fell, the dollar dropped and gold rallied as Washington appeared no closer on Sunday to raising the debt ceiling to avert a devastating default. The decline in futures points to a poor open for markets and shows investors are getting increasingly worried about the failure of legislators to coalesce around one approach. “The fact that they seem to be jumping from one type of proposal to another and not converging on anything is beginning to worry markets,” said Steven Englander, head of G10 FX strategy at Citigroup. S&P 500 futures fell at the open of electronic trading. The benchmark S&P was down 0.9 percent, or 12 points, at 1,328.70. Early currency trading suggested a move away from the dollar, with the biggest drop in the greenback coming against the Swiss franc. In early Asian trading, the dollar dropped to 0.8132 against the Swiss franc, down 0.7 percent. In commodities trading, gold futures rose to $1,610 an ounce, up $8.70, a new record for the precious metal. White House officials and Republican leaders scrambled on Sunday to reassure global markets the United States would avert a debt default, but the two sides were still not close to a deal. House Speaker John Boehner told fellow Republicans on a conference call that a large-scale debt deal was not possible with President Barack Obama. An aide to U.S. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid told Reuters on Sunday the Nevada senator was outlining a plan that would cut $2.5 trillion in spending and increase the debt limit that he hoped would be brought to the Senate floor this week. Earlier in the day, White House Chief of Staff Bill Daley warned that there would be a “few stressful days” ahead for financial markets. “There’s an old saying that things don’t matter until the day they matter; we’re getting close to the day when it will matter,” said Quincy Krosby, market strategist at Prudential Financial in Newark, New Jersey. In the past few days, markets seesawed on reports suggesting progress toward an agreement to cut the deficit that would allow for the U.S. debt ceiling to be raised and avert a market-roiling default. (Editing by Dale Hudson) Copyright 2011 Thomson Reuters. Click for Restrictions .

Read the full article →

10 Companies Whose Highest-Ever Stock Prices Are Behind Them

July 25, 2011

Some of the best known publicly traded companies in the world have stocks that will never reach their all-time highs again. Many of them are not troubled firms. In a number of cases, they simply do not grow as rapidly as they did in the past. Alternatively, they may have had one or two catastrophes that badly damaged their fortunes. Microsoft is an example of the first case; Citigroup of the second.

Read the full article →

Don McNay: Making It in the World of Self-Employment

July 24, 2011

What do we do now? -Bill McKay (Robert Redford) in the 1972 movie The Candidate I believe in self-employment. It has worked well for me, and every trend shows that’s where growth and opportunity will come from. Leading more people down that road is also part of my overall goal to reduce the influence of Wall Street on people’s lives. People need to understand that money will not come in on a steady basis, the hours will be long, and they have to stay self-motivated. For those who understand the risks, and appreciate the opportunity to go after their dreams and visions, self-employment is the way to go. Being self-employed is good for people who need, or want, to work outside the nine-to-five world, even if it’s temporary. Self-employment is not often about financing a start-up company and making the INC 500. It is often about making a living at something you enjoy. For those of us with large and unlimited ambitions, and those who have a part-time gig on the weekends, business success comes down to finding and retaining excellent customers, who, in turn, refer you to people like them. In 1999, I went to Toronto several times to be part of the Strategic Coach program founded by Dan Sullivan. Dan is a coach to highly successful entrepreneurs and has published many books. Dan once said that all it took for anyone (entrepreneurs and non-entrepreneurs) to be successful is to: Be on time Finish what you start Say please and thank you Everything comes down to respect and appreciation of the people in your life. I am one of those people who tend to show up early for everything. Long before I heard of Dan Sullivan, I was a big football fan and embraced the concept of “Lombardi time.” The concept of “Lombardi time,” is a concept credited to legendary Green Bay Packers coach Vince Lombardi. The idea is to show up 15 minutes ahead of every scheduled meeting and use the time to catch your breath, collect your thoughts, and show respect for the people you are meeting with. I am frequently the first person in a meeting room but have never considered it “wasted time.” Finish what you start is one ideal that can trip up many people, including me. I have a lot of ideas and can get off track until I focus on a larger goal. Business people know that it is not the idea but the implementation that means success. You can immediately identify people who finish what they start: They have money in their pockets. Saying please and thank you gets overlooked. I’ve done that, too. Success in life is about relationships. No one rises to the top by herself. Somewhere along the way, a family member, teacher, mentor, or friend helped a person get to a higher level. Those who get to the top of the mountain never forget that. People who want to stay on top of the mountain need to continue to remember how they got there. At the 2009 Million Dollar Round Table, I was in the audience when Sullivan noted that entrepreneurs often neglected their best clients. He compared it to marriage. He said that when people are in a courtship, no one is ever “too busy.” Once they marry, the spouse is often secondary to work, children, and other interests and hobbies. Sullivan said many spouses could be accused of “bait and switch.” They were sold one type of relationship and got another. The same holds true for business clients. When Dan used the “bait and switch” line, it was like a punch to the gut. Or a wake-up call. It made me realize what many of us do, in business and life. We overlook the people to whom we are closest. My structured settlement firm was built by attorneys and claims people referring clients to me. Most have been sending clients for more than 20 years and are intensely loyal. When they quit referring me and start using a competitor, it hurts. It really hurts. It is like losing a family member. When I find out why, it is almost universally the same answer: Someone else took the time to build a closer relationship. It is never about competence or job performance, it is always about relationship. Sometimes the competitor has a geographic or family connection, but more often than not, it is because the referral source has not seen me in a long time. In Malcolm Gladwell’s book The Tipping Point , he talks about people he calls “connectors.” Connectors go out of their way to refer people to other people. I’m that kind of guy. If I like a service, person, or product, I tell everyone about it. How and why a person refers tells a lot about character. Often times, people will refer an idiot friend or brother-in-law for a job. They aren’t interested in helping a person solve a problem; they are trying to steer income to a buddy. When I find a person like that, I won’t ever refer him. I ultimately can’t trust his judgment or motives. I want my referrer to send the best person for a job, not the person who needs a job the most. When people get to the top and dominate their profession, they assume that potential customers will come to them because they are the best. Thus, they leave themselves vulnerable to someone who is developing relationships at other levels. Mark McCormick, who founded the IMG sports marketing empire, gave a great example in his book, What They Don’t Teach You at Harvard Business School . McCormick’s first three clients were Arnold Palmer, Jack Nicklaus, and Gary Player, the three greatest golfers of that generation. He naturally assumed all other golfers would come to him and his lack of a “courtship” allowed competitors to spring up and pick off business. McCormick and IMG figured out their mistake. McCormick died several years ago, but IMG continues to be one of the dominant sports marketing firms in the world. Being on time, finishing what you start, and saying please and thank you are the foundation of any successful business. Don McNay, CLU, ChFC, MSFS, CSSC of Richmond Kentucky is an award-winning financial columnist and Huffington Post Contributor. He is the author of the book, Wealth Without Wall Street: A Main Street Guide to Making Money, which will be released on September 5. McNay founded McNay Settlement Group, a structured settlement and financial consulting firm, in 1983, and Kentucky Guardianship Administrators LLC in 2000. McNay has Master’s Degrees from Vanderbilt and the American College and is in the Hall of Distinguished Alumni of Eastern Kentucky University. McNay is a Quarter Century member of the Million Dollar Round Table and has four professional designations in the financial services

Read the full article →

China’s H1 textile output up 30%

July 24, 2011

China’s H1 textile output up 30%

Read the full article →

Four Weird Recent Economic Studies

July 24, 2011

Studies show that flexing one’s muscles may help fight off—or possibly cause—wasteful impulse purchases, and other weird money findings.

Read the full article →

GOP Tries To Set Stage For Short-Term Debt Deal

July 24, 2011

WASHINGTON — Republicans tried to set the stage for a short-term agreement to raise the debt ceiling on Sunday, even as Democrats continued to insist that a long-term deal needed to be worked out. “I understand why they’re saying they won’t sign a short-term [deal], but I think they won’t have any choice, and I think that’s the only answer right now,” Sen. Tom Coburn (R-Okla.) said on NBC’s “Meet the Press.” In a briefing with the Republican conference on Saturday, House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) announced that he would press for a short-term deal — with major spending cuts paired with longer-term deficit-reduction strategies — as a way around the current impasse. This new focus was apparent in the statements of Republicans who appeared on the Sunday morning public affairs shows. They accused President Obama of trying to push the date for the next debt ceiling increase beyond 2012 because he doesn’t want to have to deal with it before his reelection. “It’s interesting that since 1972, Congress has raised the debt ceiling for six months or less 38 times. So we can surely extend it for five or six months — have this committee of Congress come back and report on the way to continue to reduce our deficit, and in that way avert the disaster and make forward progress,” said Sen. Jon Kyl (R-Ariz.) on CBS’s “Face the Nation.” “The problem, I think, is that the single most important thing to President Obama is extending this beyond his reelection campaign. He just doesn’t want to have to deal with it again.” “I know the president is worried about the next election. But my god, shouldn’t we be worried about the country ?” added Boehner on “Fox News Sunday.” Democrats, however, made clear they are still against a short-term deal, arguing that a debt ceiling raise should not be clouded by the politics surrounding the 2012 elections. On “Face the Nation,” White House Chief of Staff Bill Daley reiterated that the administration is opposed to a short-term raise. And a Democratic official familiar with negotiations told The Huffington Post that at a 50-minute-long White House meeting on Saturday morning, the president “said he would not accept a short term extension because it could lead to a downgrade” of the United States’ credit rating. Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.), also appearing on CBS, said that a short-term deal could potentially harm the credit rating of the country. “We absolutely do not want to default,” he said. “But this notion that we’re going to replay this movie in four or five months — that we’re going to face this whole thing all over again — the American economy is too fragile at this point in recovery for us to allow that to happen. “We’ve been warned — not by political advisers,” said Durbin. “I hear the Republicans. They want to make this a campaign issue. Ignore the political advisers for a moment. Listen to the economists who are telling us — all of them together — do not lurch from one five-month period to another when it comes to the credit rating of the United States of America. Not at this moment in history.”

Read the full article →

Tricia Fox: Amy Winehouse’s Untimely Death Is a Wake Up Call for Small Business Owners

July 24, 2011

It would be terribly remiss of me not to blog about the untimely death of the 27 year-old British singer Amy Winehouse today. Unlike others, I won’t be picking apart her chosen lifestyle, nor will I be judging her. She made her own choices and, although it would appear that these choices ultimately led to her death, they were hers to make. For small business owners there is, however, a lot to be learned from Amy’s untimely death. Although rarely referred to as such, most musical artists and celebrities are businesses in their own right. In fact, for all those detractors out there that say that being “self-employed” is not a “proper” business, think again. This successful business model is one that has been proven time and time again. But whether you are a pop star, a plumber or a business consultant, the same rules still apply: you are the product. And if that’s the case, you are going to need to take really good care for yourself if you want your business to succeed. Amy got off to a great start. She had the raw talent and the skills to write and perform. She trained herself, brought the right people around her and she made it to the big time. And quickly. With five grammys and a Brit Award to her name, you’d think she was untouchable. But, like every fledgling, fast growing business, Amy lost control. Her “brand” became driven by her record company. Her “image” was tinkered with, and her relationship with the media resembled more of a cat and mouse game (where Amy was the mouse), than a strategically managed campaign. Little by little the public saw a young, healthy, talented girl, slim down to just a shadow of her former self. At first, she was talented enough to get by. Live performances, although slightly edgy, were strong enough to forgive the fact that she’d obviously had a few before she went on stage. But eventually, even this all proved too much for her adoring fans and just a few months ago, the quality of her performance was so poor she was booed off stage in Serbia. There are so many parallels here in business. A young business starts well, and gets busy. The business owner frequently ignores their own health, swapping trips to the gym for an extra couple of hours in the office, eating takeaway dinners instead of healthy home cooked food, scrimping on sleep and generally running themselves into the ground. This cycle of personal abandonment all leads to poor decision-making in business. Recruiting too many staff (usually the wrong ones) too quickly. Missing deadlines. Not responding to customers. Falling behind with the business finances. And then the wheels fall off. This is the business equivalent of being booed off stage. Clients complain, or worse — walk, and businesses are left in a spiral of decline that, in some cases can be irreversible. So, my advice to small business owners (and pop stars) is this: your job is like a marathon, not a 100m sprint. You need to train for it. Moreover you need to maintain your own health and fitness first because if you are at the core of the business. You are the brand. Start eating healthily, stop scrimping on sleep and start going to the gym. It may sound simple. But it works. You will benefit. Your customers will benefit. Your business will benefit. And today, in honour of Amy Winehouse, I am going to go to the gym. For the first time in about six months. She’s just reminded me why I should.

Read the full article →

White House, Republicans Clash As Debt Ceiling Deadline Looms

July 24, 2011

WASHINGTON — Scrambling to head off disaster, House Speaker John Boehner on Sunday readied a plan to prevent the first government default in U.S. history and said Republicans would act alone if Democrats didn’t go along. The White House said President Barack Obama would veto a plan that failed to extend the nation’s borrowing power into 2013 as time for action drew dangerously close. On a day of deepening tension, Boehner hoped to outline at least a framework of a deal by 4 p.m. EDT that could get through a divided Congress and avert panic before Asian financial markets opened hours later. The government is on pace to run out of money to pay its bills unless the debt cap is raised by Aug. 2. Boehner’s plan, still under negotiation on Capitol Hill, would likely cut spending by at least $1 trillion and extend the federal borrowing limit by a slightly smaller dollar amount, into 2012. That’s intended to get the nation beyond this crisis and snag enough votes from House Republicans who won’t raise the debt limit without spending cuts, too. “I would prefer to have a bipartisan approach to solve this problem. If that is not possible, I and my Republican colleagues in the House are prepared to move on our own,” said Boehner, R-Ohio. Deeper and more complex reductions in the nation’s deficits would be part of the deal, but under later timelines. White House chief of staff William Daley said Obama is insisting that any package must expand the debt ceiling beyond the next presidential and congressional elections and into 2013 to provide economic certainty. Daley said anything short would be a gimmick and prompt the world to say: “These people just can’t get their act together.” White House and congressional leaders talked past each other on the Sunday talks shows as negotiations unfolded in secrecy. “There will be a two-stage process. It’s just not physically possible to do all of this in one step,” Boehner said amid White House insistence that the debt limit be extended beyond 2012. “I know the president is worried about his next election. But, my God, shouldn’t he be worried about the country?” Boehner planned to update Republican House members at 4:30 p.m. EDT. Republican leaders called the rank-and-file back to Washington earlier than expected for the new work week and set a mid-afternoon Monday meeting to go over the debt-limit legislation. With an eye on the financial markets, Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner insisted anew that United States would not default. “It’s just unthinkable,” Geithner said. “We never do that. It’s not going to happen.” The debt deal-making has consumed Washington for weeks and put on display a government that at times risks utter dysfunction. Even after talks about between Obama and Boehner broke down in spectacular fashion Friday, Geithner said the two men were still negotiating. He also suggested the ambitious framework the two leaders had discussed, targeting a deficit reduction of $4 trillion, remained under consideration. “I don’t know. It may be pretty hard to put Humpty Dumpty back together again,” Boehner said of that grand plan. “But my last offer is still out there. I have never taken my last offer off of the table and they never agreed to my last offer.” That last offer included $800 billion in new tax revenues as part of a broad reform that would lower tax rates. Obama wanted $400 billion more in tax revenue for deficit reduction to help balance out the spending cuts, he said. Or, if not that, a reduction in some of the proposed cuts being discussed to entitlement programs such as Medicare. The talks halted primarily over that issue and over how to ensure that both parties kept their reform promises in the months ahead. Staff members of the congressional leaders from both parties were working to come up with an emergency plan. Boehner said he wanted it a bipartisanship approach but was ready to move ahead if that didn’t happen. Any plan must get through the Democratic-run Senate, where Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., has called a short-term debt limit expansion unacceptable. Obama’s role looms, too. Asked if Obama would veto a plan that did not extend the government’s borrowing authority into 2013, Daley said, “Yes.” One key Republican lawmaker scoffed at the administration’s opposition to a debt-ceiling plan that doesn’t last into 2013. “I think that’s a ridiculous position because that’s what he’s going to get presented with,” said Sen. Tom Coburn, R-Okla. Under any scenario, Washington’s leaders have run themselves almost out of time. It will take days to move legislation through Congress. A default could cause catastrophic damage to the standing and the economy of the United States. Daley said, in fact, the consequences are already taking hold. “I don’t think there’s any question there’s been enormous damage done to our credit-worthiness around the world,” Daley said. Boehner appeared on “Fox News Sunday.” Geithner was on Fox, ABC’s “This Week” and CNN’s “State of the Union.” Daley and Coburn spoke on NBC’s “Meet the Press,” and Daley also appeared on CBS’ “Face the Nation.” ___ Associated Press writers Dave Espo, Alan Fram and Nedra Pickler contributed to this report.

Read the full article →

Bankers Unlikely To Get Help In Tax Evasion Probe

July 24, 2011

Switzerland’s parliament would not vote for a second tax treaty to help settle U.S. charges that Credit Suisse bankers helped wealthy Americans evade taxes, Swiss politicians were quoted as saying on Sunday. In 2009, the Swiss government cut a deal with Washington to hand over the details of 4,450 UBS bank accounts to the U.S. authorities to end a damaging lawsuit against the bank, lifting the veil on Switzerland’s cherished tradition of banking secrecy that had helped it build up a multi-trillion-dollar offshore banking industry. But politicians of various affiliations said there was little appetite for a second deal to help Credit Suisse, which is being probed by U.S. authorities as part of a broader investigation into banks suspected of helping Americans evade taxes. “The enthusiasm to guarantee a bank state help again is very low,” Christian Democrat (CVP) Pirmin Bischof was quoted as saying in the SonntagsZeitung. This view was echoed by Free Democrat (FDP) Ruedi Noser in the NZZ am Sonntag newspaper. “Parliament will not accept a second state treaty,” he said. Offshore tax havens have come under attack in recent years as cash-strapped governments seek to boost revenues in the wake of the financial crisis, forcing countries like Switzerland to pledge to cooperate more to help hunt tax cheats. Last week U.S. authorities indicted three Credit Suisse private bankers for allegedly helping wealthy Americans evade taxes, bringing the total number of Credit Suisse bankers indicted to seven. Despite their insistence Credit Suisse must solve its problems alone, the growing scrutiny from the U.S. has angered some politicians, potentially straining talks between the two countries on a multibillion dollar deal over Swiss banks helping Americans to shield their money from the U.S. taxman. “If the U.S. is going to act in such a way Switzerland must break off negotiations for a political solution,” Noser was cited as saying in the NZZ am Sonntag. The talks had already become bogged down due to Swiss insistence any deal leave Swiss bankers free from prosecution in the United States, sources said last month. The investigation against Credit Suisse has also prompted Swiss private banks Sarasin and Julius Baer to ban staff from traveling to the United States. “For the last two weeks it has been necessary to get approval for all private and business trips to the U.S.,” Sarasin spokesman Benedikt Gratzl told der Sonntag. “It’s about protection. So the bank and its employees will be protected from investigations and arrests,” Gratzl said. Julius Baer declined to comment to the paper and did not immediately respond to a request for comment from Reuters. (Reporting by Caroline Copley; Editing by Erica Billingham) Copyright 2011 Thomson Reuters. Click for Restrictions .

Read the full article →

States Raise Fines And Fees To Avoid Tax Increases

July 24, 2011

NARRAGANSETT, R.I. (AP) — Twenty dollars for a parking place wasn’t going to ruin Ellen Majka’s day at the beach. But she was still taken aback when she arrived at Rhode Island’s popular Scarborough state beach and learned that parking fees had nearly doubled. “It seems a little steep to me,” said Majka, of Westfield, Mass. “Add in the price of gas and it starts to add up. But I didn’t come two hours to turn back over $20.” As states and municipalities continue to grapple with the recession’s fallout, few turned to big, noticeable tax hikes this year. Instead, they’re slashing spending and turning to more modest, narrowly crafted increases in fees and fines — nickel-and-diming their way to a balanced budget. Louisiana and South Dakota raised state park fees, while California increased vehicle registration costs and Wisconsin started charging more to retake the state driving exam. Georgia raised fees on day care licenses, fireworks permits and traveling circuses. Oregon raised fees on medical marijuana, while Rhode Island imposed taxes on over-the-counter drugs, sightseeing tours and smartphone applications. Fines are going up in many places too. Tennessee lawmakers increased traffic fines. Wyoming raised fines for trucks exceeding weight limits. New York city increased fines for taxi drivers caught talking on a cellphone while driving. In Maryland, fee increases were common solutions this year as lawmakers struggled to balance the books without across-the-board tax increases. Not even newborns went unaffected, as birth certificate fees doubled from $12. The fee for a vanity license plate doubled from $25. A surcharge on filing land records will double from $20. Kim Malle, who lives on Maryland’s Eastern Shore, isn’t only unhappy about the recently approved fees; she’s also concerned about rising tolls that are under consideration. The Grasonville resident may have to pay more to take the Bay Bridge across the Chesapeake Bay when the toll rises from $2.50 to $5 on Oct. 1 and up to $8 by 2013. “I think this state has too many fees, definitely,” Malle said after walking out of a Motor Vehicle Administration Office, where she was returning tags for a vehicle that she had sold. “I don’t mind certain things, but I just think the state overdoes it.” Julio Reyes, who was at the same office to pay the certificate of title fee, said the recent jump from $50 to $100 to title a new car was too much, too fast. “I think maybe $20 more; that’s OK,” Reyes said. “100 percent? Too much.” Fee increases can be an attractive alternative for lawmakers worried about losing political points or increasing hardships by raising income or sales taxes across the board. Professional license fees are a cost of doing business. Recreational fees are paid only by users. Don’t want to pay a tax on a new smartphone app? Don’t download it. “The folks who run government weren’t born yesterday,” said Larry Gerston, a political science professor at San Jose State University. “When they see a fee that has a built-in user base, in times of difficulty they’ll do whatever they can to extract revenue from that base. Raising fees is often easier than raising taxes. They can avoid the controversy and the public backlash.” Or, as Maryland Democratic state Sen. Richard Madaleno of Montgomery puts it: “Politically, it does appear that fees are certainly something that are more feasible — no pun intended.” But some lawmakers are tiring of the practice of using fees to avoid the dreaded T-word. Texas state Rep. Richard Pena Raymond proposed a bill this year that would require lawmakers to officially label any proposed fee increase a tax increase. “They say, `Look, it’s not a tax, it’s a user fee,’” said Raymond, a Laredo Democrat. “I say that’s bull. The public is cynical already. We have to be honest and call it what it is: a tax.” Only two states opted for across-the-board tax increases this year to resolve budget deficits, according to Susan Urahn, managing director of the Pew Center on the States. Illinois lawmakers passed a 67 percent across-the-board income tax increase, while Connecticut legislators voted to raise the state’s sales tax rate from 6 percent to 6.35 percent and impose it on new services including manicures, pet grooming and yoga classes. For the majority of states, spending cuts and focused fine and fee increases were the preferred approach. States aren’t alone in raising fees. Colleges and universities have increased fees — and tuition — to make up for funding cuts. Cities, too, are getting into the game. On Tybee Island, Ga., beach tourists are shelling out about $870,000 a year more for parking meters and tickets than they did just four years ago. After a series of increases to hourly rates and fines, parking now competes neck-and-neck with property taxes as the island city’s top source of revenue. Meters and parking are projected to raise $2.15 million a year for the island city; property taxes revenues are projected to raise $2.16 million. “It seems like everywhere they can find a place, they want to stick a meter. They’re hungry for revenue,” said Doug Hall, who’s been told by city officials they’re looking to convert eight free parking spots to metered spaces in front of the small shopping center he owns. Providence, R.I., recently enacted a fee for disposing of a mattress. Philadelphia hiked parking meter fees as part of an aid package for schools, which were facing a shortfall created in part by cuts in state aid. Greensboro, N.C., doubled fines for parking in a fire lane from $25. Lawmakers say the new fees and fines are just keeping up with the times. Rhode Island, a summer playground for many in the Northeast, last raised its beach fees in 2002. Smartphone applications didn’t even exist when lawmakers imposed the sales tax on the purchase of software at a retail computer store. Rhode Island lawmakers said they only endorsed fee increases after exhausting the list of state services or programs that could be cut. They say a bigger, across-the-board income or sales tax increase would have been a far greater burden on taxpayers: the fee and tax increases will only raise $20 million in new revenue for a state budget of $7.7 billion. Earlier in the year, lawmakers balked at an ambitious call by independent Gov. Lincoln Chafee to expand the sales tax to raise $165 million. Critics of fee increases say lawmakers who favor them often believe taxpayers won’t notice a small fee increase. Rhode Island state Rep. Robert Watson disputes that, saying consumers often will change their behavior to avoid higher fees. “I think people make decisions based on being nickeled and dimed,” said Watson, an East Greenwich Republican. “People will drive across town to save a dollar. I absolutely think people might decide to go to a certain beach because the fee is lower.” Some disgruntled fee-payers are considering even bigger moves. Tom Tompkins was blunt when asked about the fee increases while walking out of a motor vehicle office in Annapolis, Md. “I want to move to Delaware,” said Tom Tompkins, 63, of Glen Burnie, Md. Tompkins, who is retired, cited an increase in Maryland’s sales tax rate from 5 to 6 percent, approved in 2007. The lifelong Maryland resident said Delaware, which has no sales tax, looks more inviting all the time. “It’s more than annoying,” Tompkins said of his state’s new taxes and fees. “I mean, if you figure that you pay state income taxes and then you have all these fees and taxes on top of what you have left after you pay state and federal income tax, it’s pretty substantial, and I’m very serious about relocating to a state that’s more tax friendly.” Witte reported from Annapolis, Md. Contributing to this report were Associated Press writers Jonathan Cooper in Salem, Ore.; Chet Brokaw in Pierre, S.D.; Julie Carr Smyth in Columbus, Ohio; Marc Levy in Harrisburg, Pa.; Melinda Deslatte in Baton Rouge, La.; and Russ Bynum in Savannah, Ga.

Read the full article →

Which Airlines Are Cashing In & Who’s Spreading The Love With The FAA Shutdown

July 24, 2011

In case you didn’t know, the FAA was forced to partially shutdown at midnight on Friday after Congress failed to resolve a dispute over the agency’s funding. It’s been estimated that the shutdown will cost the government $200 million per week in lost revenue from airline ticket taxes. CBS News reports that the uncollected tax will come out to roughly $61 per domestic ticket.

Read the full article →

Tim Geithner Mum On How U.S. Is Preparing For Default

July 24, 2011

WASHINGTON — Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner said in three talk show appearances Sunday he was still confident Congress and the administration would come to an agreement on raising the debt limit before time runs out, and he refused to reveal details of how the administration is planning to deal with a possible default if no such bargain is struck. “It’s unthinkable that this country will not meet its obligations on time. It’s just unthinkable we’d ever do that. It’s not going to happen,” Geithner said on CNN’s “State of the Union.” But the unthinkable is clearly being thought about. On Friday, Geithner met with Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke and Federal Reserve Bank of New York President William Dudley to discuss “the implications for the U.S. economy if Congress fails to act.” On “Fox News Sunday,” Geithner refused to give any specifics about the United States’ contingency plans, even when pressed repeatedly on the matter by host Chris Wallace. “Our plan is to get Congress to raise the debt ceiling raised on time … We do not have the ability, Chris, to protect the American people from the consequences of Congress not taking that action,” said Geithner, dodging Wallace’s question several times. Throughout his Sunday morning appearances, Geithner stressed that he believes some sort of grand bargain can still be reached before the country hits its $14.3 trillion limit on borrowing on Aug. 2, and he reiterated the administration’s opposition to a short-term plan. “The most important thing is that we remove this threat of default from the country for the next 18 months,” Geithner said on CNN, pushing the next time the debt ceiling would need to be raised beyond the 2012 elections. On Fox, he blamed politics for getting in the way of Congress taking action. “We are running out of runway,” said Geithner. “I never thought they would take it this close to the edge and let politics get in the way of demonstrating the will of paying our bills on time.” But later on Fox, House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) accused President Obama of worrying about reelection as one of the reasons he’s passing up a short-term deal. “I know the president is worried about the next election. But my god, shouldn’t we be worried about the country?” asked Boehner. Boehner said Friday that one of the reasons talks had broken down was that Obama “moved the goal post” on tax revenue. He said the original agreement was for $800 billion , but Democrats then wanted another $400 billion on top of that. But on ABC’s “This Week,” Geithner disputed that claim, denying that Democrats and Republicans had ever agreed on an $800 billion deal. “No, we did not. And the president and the speaker got very close. But there was a whole range of things yet to be resolved at that point when the speaker pulled out on Friday,” he said. “At that point, the Republicans were still asking for deeper cuts in Medicare and Medicaid than we thought was acceptable,” he continued. “Our position was — as you heard the president say — is we want to make sure the deal is balanced so that we’re not putting too much of the burden of getting our fiscal house in order on the backs of elderly Americans and the most vulnerable. And so at that point, we were very close, but we were not there yet.” On “Fox News Sunday,” Boehner said his offer of $800 billion in new revenue is still out there. “It may be pretty hard to put Humpty Dumpty back together again, but my last offer is still out there,” said Boehner. “I’ve never taken my last offer off the table.”

Read the full article →

White House: Debt Ceiling Talks Moving Into ‘Difficult Days’

July 24, 2011

WASHINGTON (Reuters) – White House Chief of Staff Bill Daley said Sunday that negotiations over the U.S. debt limit and deficit reduction were moving into “difficult days” and said it was crucial to market confidence to get a deal soon. Speaking on the NBC program “Meet the Press,” Daley expressed confidence that Congress would act in time to raise the debt ceiling because congressional leaders have all said default is not an option. Daley added, however, that markets around the world are waiting to see if U.S. officials can reach an agreement. “We are now getting to a point where markets around the world will question whether the political system can come together and compromise for the greater good of the country,” he said. Daley said the White House wants a deal struck that would raise the debt ceiling by enough so that another vote is not needed before the November 2012 elections. He said the White House is open to a two-step process in which some deficit savings are agreed upon later this year or early next year. “This has to be two steps,” he said. “But the second step must get us through ’13 without having to go through this ridiculous fight over extending the debt ceiling.” (Reporting by Dave Clarke and Caren Bohan; Editing by Christopher Wilson and Will Dunham) Copyright 2011 Thomson Reuters. Click for Restrictions .

Read the full article →

Boehner: ‘It May Be Pretty Hard To Put Humpty Dumpty Back Together Again’

July 24, 2011

WASHINGTON (Reuters) – Republican U.S. House of Representatives Speaker John Boehner said Sunday that he would prefer to unveil a bipartisan deal to raise the debt ceiling and that his last offer to Democratic President Barack Obama was still on the table. “The preferable path would be a bipartisan plan that involves all the leaders, but it is too early to decide whether that’s possible,” Boehner said on Fox News Sunday. “If that’s not possible, I and my Republican colleagues in the House are prepared to move on our own.” He also said that raising the debt ceiling and implementing major reforms would have to be done in two stages. `”There is going to be a two-stage process. It is not physically possible to do all of this in one step.” Boehner said his offer that included some $800 billion in new tax revenue and massive spending cuts was never withdrawn. That plan was dubbed the “grand bargain” despite his decision to walk away from negotiations with Obama last week. “I don’t know, it may be pretty hard to put Humpty Dumpty back together again. My last offer is still out there. I’ve never taken my last offer off the table,” Boehner said, noting that the White House never has agreed to it. At the moment, however, Boehner said that the better path was working with his congressional colleagues “to put together a process” that is do-able. (Reporting by Jeremy Pelofsky and Donna Smith, editing by Christopher Wilson) Copyright 2011 Thomson Reuters. Click for Restrictions .

Read the full article →

Vietnam’s July inflation up 22.16%

July 24, 2011

Vietnam’s July inflation up 22.16%

Read the full article →

Volvo Q2 net income up 62% to USD816m

July 24, 2011

Volvo Q2 net income up 62% to USD816m

Read the full article →