September 2011

Huffington Post…

WASHINGTON — Since announcing his run for the presidency, Texas Governor Rick Perry (R) has had to fend off allegations of crony capitalism . Such critiques have revealed the governor’s easy relationships with lobbyists , and his awarding campaign donors government contracts and influential positions on state boards. But Perry has also personally profited from these same relationships. His own deal making has helped him become a millionaire, and it has not gone unnoticed. In the late ’90s, federal law enforcement authorities investigated allegations that Perry had engaged in insider trading, sources involved in the inquiry tell The Huffington Post. On Jan. 24, 1996, Perry purchased 2,800 shares of stock in a company, Kinetic Concepts, Inc. , owned by a San Antonio businessman soon to be one of Perry’s top donors, James Leininger . It was great timing. Later that day, a group of investors bought up 2.2 million shares in the company, sending the price soaring and netting Perry a nice gain. On the day of the stock purchases, Perry had given a speech before a group founded by Leininger. Both Perry and Leininger later admitted talking on the day in question but denied discussing the stock. Perry would go on to sell his Kinetic Concepts stock — a total of more than 8,000 shares — a month later for a $38,000 profit. It took at least two years for an Austin attorney to uncover the suspicious trade. The attorney, who would only discuss the matter on condition of anonymity because he continues to have dealings with the U.S. Attorney’s Office, said he spoke with two sources who corroborated that Perry and Leininger had met on the day in question and that the donor had advised the politician on the stock purchase. “Perry bought immediately,” the attorney recalled. “I mean it was immediately. It was immediately after that that the transaction was announced and the stock went up considerably. My source was telling me that Leininger told [Perry] to go buy some stock.” “I was told that such a private conversation took place and in that private conversation, Leininger told him he needed to invest a little money,” the attorney added. The attorney took his findings to federal prosecutors. They met in an Austin ice cream parlor and he related what he knew. James William Blagg, who was the U.S. Attorney for Texas’ Western District at the time, confirmed there was an investigation into the Perry stock tip and that he deemed the allegation credible enough to pass to the FBI. “I received some information and supplied it to the FBI,” he told HuffPost. “That’s exactly what happened. That’s what I recall happening.” An FBI spokesperson did not return multiple calls seeking comment. The allegations may have had merit, Blagg recalled, but he questioned their provenance. They had come to him, he said, from strongly anti-Perry sources. The Austin attorney contradicts Blagg’s memory. He told HuffPost that one of his sources was getting information directly from the Perry camp. “The circumstances were so overwhelming that it made it very believable,” the attorney explained. “I didn’t doubt it. I certainly wouldn’t be talking to the U.S. Attorney’s Office if I thought it wasn’t credible. I still believe it to this day.” The problem, Blagg recalled, was that the information he received did not contain a smoking gun — an email exchange, a recorded conversation, anything that would have made the case airtight enough to indict a powerful Texas politician. Without documentation, insider-trading prosecutions become he said-she said affairs that are difficult to sell to a jury. Still, the tip merited enough interest to pass it up the chain. “I asked them [the FBI] to look into it,” Blagg said, “but nothing came of it.” After the news broke of the stock deal in 1998, both Perry and Leininger denied any wrongdoing. Perry told the Dallas Morning News : “There was never any conversation with Dr. Jim Leininger about his stock. There was talk about family and public policy, but not about the stock.” Mark Miner, Perry’s presidential campaign spokesman, responded to the allegations via email, telling HuffPost that the Securities and Exchange Commission had “reviewed the matter and dismissed it.” He added that the U.S. Attorney’s Office’s involvement was news to him. “I am not familiar with any other federal review,” Miner wrote, “and there was never action on these false accusations.” The episode was the closest Perry has come to serious legal jeopardy in connection with his controversial financial dealings with political cronies and top-tier donors. But the stock’s $38,000 payout was peanuts compared to Perry’s real estate transactions. * * * * * Perry’s business acumen wasn’t immediately apparent. He did not excel at Texas A&M. He flew beefed-up cargo planes in the Air Force before returning to his father’s farm in Haskell County. The hard work of farming did not interest Perry . “He never really had a job,” said Jim Hightower , the former Texas agriculture commissioner who lost his job to Perry in 1990. “It’s not like he’s a businessman.” In the year that he took over as agriculture commissioner, Perry’s net farm profits totaled $802 . “You’ve got a guy whose father went broke on a regular basis,” explained Peck Young , director of Austin Community College’s Center for Public Policy and Political Studies and a former political consultant. “Dry land farming — it’s a hard business to get rich on, easy to get broke on. The family was in financial straights. Then he got into politics.” Perhaps Perry’s most lavish pre-politics purchase was half an interest in 60 acres on the outskirts of Haskell County. The investment cost him $30,000. Perry shared the acreage with another couple, Tim and Paula Everett, who knew his wife, Anita, well. “We bought land so we could build a house on half of it and they could build a house on half of it,” Paula Everett told HuffPost. “I grew up with them. I went to elementary school and high school and college with Anita. Her dad was our family doctor.” Tim Everett said of Rick Perry: “He was like the rest of us here.” When Perry started out in the state legislature as a Democratic representative in the mid-’80s, his salary came to $7,200 a year. Anita Perry worked as a nurse. In 1985, the couple bought a house in Haskell for $95,000. Two years later, the Perrys had listed their total income at $45,000 . During one legislative session in Austin, Perry shared an apartment with three representatives. One roommate, former state Rep. Tom Uher, also a Democrat, recalled that Perry slept on the floor. Uher said he considered Perry to be nice but a “greenhorn.” Perry also liked to talk. “He was just a young, verbal guy,” Uher explained. “He didn’t show any wisdom or experience that he was one to listen to. To me, he never came across as having exceptional skills.” In the legislature, Perry and other like-minded fiscally conservative Democrats became known as “the pit bulls.” The title stuck, but their impact was limited. “He was no factor,” said Young. “I can tell you he was considered a non-player. He wasn’t a power. He didn’t have any say over legislation. The things he did touch were of no consequence to anybody.” Perry was elected agriculture commissioner in 1990. In his first decade holding state-wide office, he earned more than $2 million . In 2009, Perry listed his net worth at just over $1 million. As a government official with enormous hold on appointments and business interests across Texas, Perry created a one-man, public-private partnership where a key ex-staffer, along with donors and political allies, set up sweetheart deals. Pivotal appointments, government contracts and friendly legislation were soon to follow. At the center of it all were land transactions. A Perry friend and Austin businessman explained to HuffPost that there was nothing illegal going on. “It was friends giving him tips on something to buy,” he said. “It wasn’t like, ‘Here we’re going to set you up.’ And the deals were too small to accomplish something like that.” Miner, Perry’s campaign spokesman, doesn’t see the deals as anything close to crony capitalism. “As to the real estate transactions, all were above-board, arms-length, market-based transactions and fully disclosed on the Governor’s personal finance and tax forms,” he wrote in an email. But the Houston Chronicle reported that “almost everyone who steered Perry to his money-making deals has seen rewards. … Six received key state government appointments or jobs. Two benefited from government actions that had the potential to enhance their real estate holdings.” Young, the Austin Community College center director, said this type of transactional politics is nothing new in Texas. “The ethos here in Texas is you get into office and you’re stupid if you don’t get rich,” he explained. “[Perry] seemed to make an art form out of it. He managed to make it into a family business.” A few deals stick out. In 1993, Perry bought a nondescript piece of property in Austin for $122,000. The land would become essential to Dell Computer founder Michael Dell , who was building a home nearby. Perry later told the press that he had intended to build a home on the property. Two years later, Perry sold the nine acres to Dell for $465,000 . The Texas Tribune reported that Dell needed the land to “get access to important municipal sewage infrastructure.” News accounts noted that Tim Timmerman, an Austin real estate developer and Perry friend, had persuaded Perry to buy the land in the first place. Timmerman has since given close to $70,000 to Perry’s campaigns from 2000 to 2010, the Houston Chronicle reported , noting that Perry eventually appointed him to an influential board . Timmerman did not return multiple calls seeking comment. Mike Toomey , the lobbyist who would eventually work for Perry as his chief of staff and later become central in the HPV vaccine controversy , served as Perry’s power of attorney in the deal. Toomey did not return calls seeking comment. The Perry friend recalled encouraging Perry to buy the property he would later sell to Dell. Perry, he said, wasn’t so sure. The land was on the side of a hill. “I said I think it’s practically worthless,” the Perry friend explained, adding that it wasn’t “usable.” “But when Michael Dell wakes up and he’s planning his whole estate, he’ll want to buy it. His wife is going to demand that he buys that property.” Another long-time friend directed Perry to an even more lucrative deal. Republican Sen. Troy Fraser had known Perry since they were teenagers. They’d since followed each other’s careers closely. Perry had helped Fraser out when he first ran for the state legislature. So when Fraser took an interest in a resort community known as Horseshoe Bay , he purchased two adjoining lots — one for his family and one for Perry’s. Like the Everett deal, Fraser told HuffPost that the plan was for the two families to live next to each other. “We were going to build retirement properties,” he said. “That’s where we were going to retire — next to each other.” Only this time, instead putting down $30,000, Perry would have to invest 10 times that amount. Fraser told HuffPost that Perry liked the idea but said he just didn’t have the money to buy the property. Fraser said he did Perry a favor by purchasing it for him. “He didn’t have the $300,000 to buy the property,” Fraser said. “He wanted it.” “We had an agreement on the day that I bought the property,” Fraser said. “I loaned him $300,000 to buy the property.” In 2001, six months after the purchase, Fraser sold Perry the property for $300,000 plus interest. The Dallas Morning News hired an appraiser who judged the land to be actually worth $450,000. Perry never built that retirement home. Six years later, he sold the property for $1.15 million to Alan Moffatt , a British national who is the owner of an aviation firm (and was questioned on suspicious arms sales to Rwanda during the ’90s). The Morning News ‘ appraiser claimed the sale price was $350,000 above market value. Moffatt owned a home across the street from the Perry property. “He wanted to build another home,” explained Doug Jaffe, the resort’s developer. “I think the governor sold it too cheap. He did. I know he did.” Jaffe said Moffatt went through his real estate company to purchase Perry’s land. Prior to the sale, the governor’s office had cleared a $2.5 million grant to a separate, Jaffe-founded aircraft company. The Houston Chronicle noted that the money never made it to the company because it failed to meet “job-growth commitments.” Fraser insists the original deal was legitimate: “It was nothing more than a real estate transaction — two friends wanting to building houses next to each other.” The Perry friend agrees. He characterized the Horseshoe Bay transaction as “buddy to buddy,” and a lucky “inside deal.” * * * * * Due to renovation work and an arson of the governor’s mansion, the Perry family has resided in a rental mansion since 2007 , at a cost of $10,000 a month to taxpayers. Home items covered by public funds include a set of $1,000 drapes from Neiman Marcus, a $700 clothes rack, an $8,400 maintenance bill for the heated pool and other luxuries. The Perrys’ first two years in the rental property cost taxpayers $600,000 . During this time, Perry was busted for claiming a College Station property he owned as his principle residence in an effort to get a break on property taxes. Perry’s daughter lived on the property while attending Texas A&M. But her roommates paid rent to the family. For several years, Perry had failed to disclose his rental earnings with the Texas Ethics Commission as required. Nor did he disclose the loan that paid for the property. Perry had secured financing for the loan on the College Station, Texas, property through a subsidiary of Plains Capital Bank. James Huffines , a Perry mega-donor, is an executive with the bank. Perry had also appointed Huffines to the University of Texas Board of Regents. Huffines resigned the day a complaint about the rental property was filed with the Texas Ethics Commission. Huffines’ family has contributed $300,000 to various Perry campaigns. The Dallas Morning News reported that Huffines’ bank received roughly $88 million in federal bailout money in 2008. The financing for the College Station house suggests that Perry put no money down when he got the loan for the property. The house was valued at more than $200,000. The Texas Ethics Commission fined Perry $1,500 for the disclosure failures . Huffines did not return multiple calls to his home and office seeking comment. A few months after the Kinetic Concepts stock deal, Perry put his finances in a blind trust. Bill White, Houston’s former mayor who ran unsuccessfully against Perry in the 2010 governor’s race, helped uncover the College Station property controversy. He argued for more transparency from the governor and continues to do so. “We asked for Perry to support our proposed changes in ethics laws, including prompt online reporting of contributions to committees used to pay for travel and the expenses of his residence, as well as complete reporting of all income from assets which he knew about before they were placed in a blind trust,” White wrote in email to HuffPost. “Perry has not supported [these] changes.” Whatever controversy or potential controversy surrounded Perry’s dealings over the years, they did little to alter the universe of the players involved. The same year that Perry made his stock purchase, Leininger sold Perry’s campaign a plane at below-market value. Two years later, during the extremely tight race for lieutenant governor, Leininger secured a last-minute $1.1 million loan for the Perry campaign. After Perry’s razor-thin victory, his opponent John Sharp said : “I congratulate Leininger. He wanted to buy the reins of state government. And by God, he got them.” According to the nonpartisan watchdog group Texans for Public Justice, Leininger has given $239,000 to Perry’s campaign coffers between 2001 and 2009. Leininger did not return multiple calls seeking comment. But the Perry friend who spoke with HuffPost insists there’s nothing unethical about the relationship. “They are very, very tight,” he said. “Leininger’s not a guy who can do something shady. Perry’d take advantage of something like that.”

Continue reading here:
Rick Perry Faced Federal Scrutiny For Insider Trading, Criticism For Land Deals

Find our Weekly Commercial Real Estate, Private Equity and Fund Newsletters at www.WeeklyBrief.net

{ 0 comments }

Huffington Post…

NEW YORK — AT&T Inc. on Friday asked a court to eject rival Sprint Nextel Corp. from the process that looks at whether AT&T should be allowed to buy T-Mobile USA. Sprint, the nation’s third-largest cellphone company, and a smaller phone company, C Spire Wireless (known as Cellular South until last Monday), both want to be parallel participants in the Justice Department’s suit against AT&T’s acquisition on antitrust grounds. Participating would give them a chance to affect the proceedings, even if the Justice Department is the most important objector to the deal. AT&T filed a motion Friday to have the complaints by the two phone companies dismissed, saying Sprint and C Spire are speaking in their own interests, not the public’s. Sprint said AT&T’s motion is without merit, and it will respond next week. AT&T, the No. 2 cellphone carrier in the United States, announced in March its $39 billion deal to buy T-Mobile USA, the No. 4 carrier, with a view to closing it early next year. The Justice Department filed suit to stop the deal a month ago in U.S. District Court in Washington, saying it would concentrate too much market power in one company, leading to higher prices for consumers. AT&T says the deal will allow it to better serve customers and expand its wireless network. Several states have joined the suit. Puerto Rico joined on Friday. AT&T on Friday said Sprint has “spoken disingenuously” about its motives for the merger, and has suggested that Sprint be allowed to buy T-Mobile USA. C Spire has suggested that it would not oppose the merger if AT&T agreed to use its network in Mississippi and surrounding states, C Spire’s home territory. “Such an extraordinary and inappropriate proposal simply confirms that what Cellular South fears is competition, not an alleged lack of competition,” AT&T said. “Today’s motion will provide us with another good opportunity to demonstrate why AT&T’s proposed takeover of T-Mobile is blatantly anticompetitive,” said Eric Graham, C Spire’s vice president for strategic and government relations. AT&T shares fell 32 cents to close at $28.52 in trading Friday.

Original post:
AT&T Asks Judge To Throw Out Sprint’s Antitrust Suit

Find our Weekly Commercial Real Estate, Private Equity and Fund Newsletters at www.WeeklyBrief.net

{ 0 comments }

Who’s In And Who’s Out Of The Donald Trump Primary

September 30, 2011

WASHINGTON — Despite giving up his phantom campaign months ago, real estate mogul Donald Trump evidently has had an imprint on the Republican presidential primary. Three candidates — Rep. Michele Bachmann, Texas Gov. Rick Perry and former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney — have met with Trump, as has perpetual campaign flirt Sarah Palin. A fourth candidate, business executive Herman Cain, is set to rub elbows with Trump this week. And while Romney scurried away from the Trump Tower hoping to avoid photographers waiting outside, he and others clearly calculated that it was better to embrace the Donald than to risk his ire. Then there is Jon Huntsman, the former Utah governor who has staked his candidacy on running what constitutes a reason-based campaign. In that context, his team has figured there’s more to gain from picking fights with Trump than in sucking up to him. When Romney went to visit Trump, Huntsman spokesman Tim Miller mocked the move. “Hoping Romney wins the Trump endorsement today. Birtherism, trade wars, & helicoptering to press conferences really resonate in NH,” Miller tweeted . And when Trump responded by saying he wouldn’t waste his time meeting with a candidate who “has zero chance of getting the nomination,” Miller responded in kind. @JonHuntsman isn’t wasting his time w/ Presidential Apprentice. His focus is on real solutions to fix our economy. It stands to reason that Huntsman will not be making a pilgrimage to Trump Tower any time soon. So when Trump tweeted on Friday that he had not returned a call from Huntsman to set up a meeting, it was either a symbolic reversal or simply misinformation. The Huntsman campaign says it’s the latter. His candidate didn’t call Trump on Friday, Miller told The Huffington Post. [ View the story "Huntsman Campaign vs. Trump" on Storify] Earlier on HuffPost:

Read the full article →

Where Students Most Want To Work

September 30, 2011

Google (GOOG) is still the most popular employer in the world among business students, according to Universum’s latest global ranking.

Read the full article →

CIB Marine Bancshares, Inc. Announces Appointment of Mark A. Elste to Its Board of Directors

September 30, 2011

WAUKESHA, WI–(Marketwire – Sep 30, 2011) – CIB Marine Bancshares, Inc. ( PINKSHEETS : CIBH ) announced today that Mark A. Elste has been named to the Company’s Board of Directors.

Read the full article →

Shovel-Ready Projects: They Exist, And We May Need Them For A Long Time

September 30, 2011

NEW YORK — As President Barack Obama pushes for his American Jobs Act, some on the right and in the press have claimed there are no “shovel-ready” projects in the United States available to receive federal funding. The state transportation departments who are on the front line of infrastructure spending, however, strenuously disagree. And some economists say we’ll be enduring the downturn for so long that the question of whether the new jobs associated with the projects are created within the next 12 months, while an important political consideration, is almost irrelevant in economic terms. The president’s bill contains $105 billion for road-building, school modernization and more. Republicans have argued the money that has been spent so far on infrastructure has been wasted. “Don’t forget, the president made the same promises when he was selling his first stimulus,” Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Kentucky) said on the Senate floor. “Yet 2 1/2 years later what do we have to show for it?” And attaining Congress’s approval for all that money wasn’t made any easier when the president joked in June that sometimes during the stimulus “shovel-ready was not as shovel-ready as we expected.” But states say they’re ready to go. “We feel certain that we would have projects ready to go if we received additional funding,” said Sally Oxenhandler, a spokesperson for the Missouri Department of Transportation. “We do have a five-year construction program that’s a rolling program. We have quite a few projects in the hopper that we would be able to move up.” Oxenhandler noted that when the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act was signed in 2009, her department went to start replacing a Depression-era bridge the very same day . It’s hard to find a state transportation department that says it couldn’t put more money to use in 2012. That comes as no surprise to Jack Basso, Director of Program Finance and Management at the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). In 2010, AASHTO surveyed its members on the size of their unfunded project backlogs and found that they could use almost $50 billion for highways alone (the Recovery Act put $27.5 billion more towards those big roads). “I bet the number’s considerably bigger at this point,” Basso said. “I’m quite confident that we haven’t drained the swamp.” Transportation authorities across the country rely on gas tax dollars to build highways and bridges, but the gas tax is not tied to inflation and hasn’t been raised since 1993. So many states are struggling to pay for projects. As Basso explained it, for some projects in state transportation pipelines, it would only take 30-60 days for Federal Highway Administration approval and then another 30 days for states to put out bids. That’s an ideal timeline. While some of the big-ticket projects — the Hoover Dams of the infrastructure world — might require those much-dreaded environmental approvals , others have already received federal approval but are waiting on financing. Scott Magruder of the Nevada Department of Transportation said that with more money, his department could complete the Carson City Freeway and the first phase of the Boulder City Bypass, near Las Vegas. Both projects cost about $100 million each. “Those are ready to go, and unfunded, and the environmental process is complete,” Magruder said. “The right of way’s all purchased, the environmental’s all done, it’s just waiting on funding.” Arizona is also waiting. “The Arizona Department of Transportation recently submitted to the Federal Highway Administration eight projects totaling $423,448,000 that are considered ready-to-construct,” said Timothy Tait, an assistant communication director. “These projects include a new urban freeway in metro Phoenix, interstate highway expansion, rural highway enhancements and a bridge replacement.” And there are plenty of other, smaller public works projects across the U.S. that could use a few extra dollars. “On Monday we’re advertising for design firms to do design work on a 187 small bridges. Obviously, with more money we could do more of that. We have tremendous needs all across the state,” said Nicole Meister, a spokesperson for the North Carolina Department of Transportation. “We have a lot of needs here,” she noted. “Some projects yes, are big projects that require more environmental work. Others are small projects like small bridge replacements.” “You do get into situations where we have projects ready to go but don’t have funding yet,” she added. Moody’s Analytics estimates that for every $1 spent on infrastructure spending the government creates $1.59 in economic growth. But some of that multiplier effect may be diminished when projects take too long to go through government approvals , according to US News and World Reports . Macroeconomic Advisors, another analysis firm, estimates that the federal government would put out the infrastructure money relatively quickly: “2/5 of this money will be spent by the end of 2012, 2/3 of it by the end of 2013, and the rest over the next several years.” The delay might not matter much, except to politicians looking ahead to re-election, if, as the Congressional Budget Office estimates , the country doesn’t return to its “natural rate of unemployment” until 2016. “This is not a normal recession, [where] all of sudden we’re gonna have a huge amount of stimulus and be back to full employment,” said Ethan Pollack, a senior policy analyst at the Economic Policy Institute. “I dream of having that problem — ‘Oh no! Too many people are employed!’ ” “There is a balance between getting the money out quickly and getting the money out to good projects — so there’s a certain lag time,” Pollack added. And the argument against more infrastructure funding, “basically rests on the assumption that we shouldn’t be doing it if the economy is better,” he noted. The president claimed in his address on the American Jobs Act that it “answers the urgent need to create jobs right away.” But he also added that Congress needed “to look beyond the immediate crisis and start building an economy that lasts into the future.” The American Society of Civil Engineers thinks the country needs to spend $2.2 trillion over the next five years to get our bridges, dams, pipes, railroads and levees in shape. Still, the amount of money proposed in the American Jobs Act for infrastructure spending — some $105 billion — sounds big, but even by the most optimistic estimates would only put a modest dent in our current, sky-high unemployment level. David Obey, the former Democratic chairman of the House Appropriations Committee, said “you cannot expect a jobs package to perform a miracle. All it can do is help around the edges.” Factors beyond U.S. control, like the debt crisis in the Euro-zone, may determine more than infrastructure spending how fast we put people back to work. But the recession is “going to be with us a long time,” Obey noted. “So we ought to do anything we can to tee these projects up. No matter what we do, it’s better than doing nothing.” CORRECTION : An earlier version of this article incorrectly stated that the Missouri Department of Transportation began work repairing a Depression-era bridge in 2009. In fact, the department worked to replace the bridge.

Read the full article →

AMCOL International Corporation (NYSE: ACO) Announces Appointment of New Director

September 30, 2011

HOFFMAN ESTATES, IL–(Marketwire – Sep 30, 2011) – AMCOL International Corporation ( NYSE : ACO ) is pleased to announce the appointment of Frederick J. Palensky, Ph.D. as a director of the Company, effective immediately. Dr. Palensky will serve as a Class II Director and will stand for election by all shareholders at the 2012 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. Dr. Palensky will serve on the Compensation Committee.

Read the full article →

Porter Gale: Making The Pitch: What A 20-Year Old Whiz Kid Did Right

September 30, 2011

We’ve all heard that getting your foot in the door is more than just being at the “right place at the right time.” But there are other factors people often neglect in the timing of business breakthroughs, especially when it comes to pitching. What’s a big factor in landing your pitch? Determination. And I had an opportunity to witness determination in the flesh while eating breakfast with Brian Wong, a 20-year whiz kid and the CEO of Kiip. Although Brian and I know several people in common, including a local DJ that goes to every fundraiser in town, it took a few charming, persistent emails (in addition to his interesting story) before he made it onto my calendar. I met Brian about a year ago at a tech mixer, but this opportunity would be the first time we would actually share breakfast. Excited and intrigued, I Googled him before we met. Ben Parr, the writer from Mashable, had posted an image of Brian cart-wheeling through the streets of San Francisco after he had raised over $4 million in funding. And, a variety of sites had videos or articles on him. Reports said he had skipped four grades as a child, graduated college at 18 and moved to San Francisco to live his dream. As I read more, a quote from a TechCrunch interview where Brian described his pitch technique . “I like to call it Inception, like the movie. You have to seed the idea first, you have to let them think of it as well, and at the same time, you’re revealing it. If you have that parallel, then you have them; the vision is now in their head.” Wow, the whiz kid’s technique could be a Dale Carnegie tip from How To Win Friends & Influence People . Let the funder come to the conclusion first. Just after 8:00am Brian arrived, “sorry I’m a bit late, I was at the office sending out press releases about our new relationship with Guinness Book of World Records.” Brian’s company provides real-world rewards for virtual achievements on mobile platforms. And now, every Kiip-enabled game will be tracked and your achievement could earn you a world record. That certainly is memorable. To see what made Brian Wong memorable to others, I checked in with Lars Leckie, a Partner at Hummer Windblad, one of the firms that funded Kiip. “The part of the pitch that we talked about after he left the room was his idea of creating advertising inventory attached to moments of joy, success and happiness. This is the holy grail of marketing…and we saw that Brian and his team had a shot at creating a company around this idea,” said Leckie. What did Brian do right? He provided the baseline for tip one. In order to be memorable, you or your idea has to be unique. What else helps you move forward? As Leckie said, “We also look for founders who walk through walls to move their vision forward … [someone who] is deeply passionate and often a little irrational and they must have the ability to motivate others to join the vision and jump onboard the team.” So you see, the second step to becoming and remaining memorable is being a visionary who is passionate and persuasive. With regard to Brian, the three descriptions that Lars Leckie used that best describe him were, “sharp intellect, boundless energy and a magnetic personality.” With those in your mind, it may not come as a surprise that Brian didn’t order coffee when we met. Natural energy and passion aside, I want to ask, what makes you or your company memorable? My third tip for remaining memorable is to complete an exercise I’ve done with companies which is creating a three-word brand filter. One rumored filter for a successful technology company is “simple, beautiful and innovative.” What’s your three-word filter? Spend some time thinking about it. Post it here in the comments section below. Practice makes perfect. “Sharp intellect, boundless energy and a magnetic personality.” Now that’s a way to be remembered. And personally, my vote is that Brian should be in the Guinness Book of World Record’s. His start-up now employees eighteen people and he’s not even old enough to legally buy a drink. This 20-year old is doing quite a few things right. This is the third article in a series on entrepreneurialism and career changes by Porter Gale ( 1st article and 2nd article ). Be sure to share your comments on what makes you memorable in the box below and Tweet your three-word brand filter to @portergale .

Read the full article →

Eventbrite Warns Customers After iPad Theft

September 30, 2011

The online ticketing company Eventbrite warned customers Thursday to monitor their email accounts for suspicious messages after two company iPads storing sensitive customer data were stolen from an employee. In a letter emailed to customers and posted on the company’s blog , Eventbrite CEO Kevin Hartz said the iPads were stolen from an employee on Sept 20. The data stored on the devices included names and email addresses of customers who bought tickets online to one customer event, Hartz said. The lost data also included full credit card numbers for 28 attendees who purchased tickets at the event. Those credit card numbers were not encrypted due to a bug in the company’s iPad application, he said. As Eventbrite tried to determine what other information may have been stored on the stolen iPads, the company remotely locked the devices and erased the data, Hartz said. The letter noted that the company believed the risk for criminal misuse was low, but it asked customers to watch their email accounts for suspicious messages and to avoid sharing financial or sensitive information over email. “Please note that Eventbrite will never ask for passwords or credit card numbers over email,” Hartz said. To prevent this from happening in the future, Hartz said that the company had updated its iPad application, Eventbrite At The Door, to encrypt email addresses collected at events and that the company would no longer store email addresses collected from online orders on mobile devices. “We know that having your personal data compromised is a violation of the trust you place in Eventbrite, and we offer you our deepest apologies,” Hartz said. Eventbrite, a ticketing startup with 144 employees based in San Francisco, helps event organizers to create web pages, issue tickets and promote their events online. Founded in 2006, the company has typically catered to smaller events, but has expanded its ambitions recently in an effort to take business from industry giant Ticketmaster. In March, Eventbrite announced it had raised $50 million in venture capital and expects to earn more than $400 million in sales this year, almost double its revenue from last year. The theft of the iPads highlights the security risks that companies face as they increasingly use mobile devices to run their businesses. In a survey of 1,500 businesses in 14 countries , released in May by the security firm McAfee and Carnegie Mellon University, 40 percent said their mobile devices have been lost or stolen, half of which stored company data. Security experts say customers whose names and email addresses are exposed through data breaches are vulnerable to “spear phishing,” or targeted attacks by hackers who send personalized emails apparently from trusted companies seeking to trick users into revealing personal data or downloading malicious software. According to the FBI’s cybercrime division, Internet users can take several measures to avoid becoming a spear-phishing victim : Keep in mind that most companies, banks, agencies, etc., don’t request personal information via e-mail. If in doubt, give them a call (but don’t use the phone number contained in the e-mail — that’s usually phony as well). Use a phishing filter … many of the latest web browsers have them built in or offer them as plug-ins. Never follow a link to a secure site from an e-mail — always enter the URL manually. Don’t be fooled (especially today) by the latest scams. Visit the Internet Crime Complaint Center (IC3) and “LooksTooGoodToBeTrue” websites for tips and information.

Read the full article →

James Altucher: The Most Popular Way People Get to My Blog! Yay!

September 30, 2011

The single most popular way people have arrived at my blog who have no idea who I am (so this eliminates all social media) is by typing in the words “I Want to Die” into a search engine . 4,722 people did that this last month. Specifically that phrase: “I Want to Die”. In Google. A smaller percentage typed: “how can I die?” Then they got to this post. And it’s sort of obvious why. They’ve lost money. We associate money with not only net worth but self worth. When we have less money we tend to get sick, stressed, depressed, and we lose touch with family and friends. It’s harder to be a good parent. It’s harder to be a good husband. We feel like a zero. Like a less than zero. Money doesn’t solve all of our problems but it solves our money problems. Whenever I’ve lost money, or been down to zero, it’s been very hard for me to function. People, as a society, stopped making money in 2007. Think about it — they always made money beforehand. In the 1950s for the first time ever we had dual income homes. That gave us extra spending money. Then a booming stock market in the 60s. Then inflation in the 70s boosted our incomes artificially. Then we had the 80s junk bond boom. Then we had the 90s Internet boom. Then the 00s housing boom. Then… … nothing. The government said, “don’t worry about it, we’ll step in.” So they printed up $1.6 trillion. Guess what? The banks now have an extra $1.6 trillion in the bank. Someone forgot to give us the money! 55 years of spending fueled by double-income jobs, inflation, debt, stocks, and more debt. And now… nothing. So what do people do? They type “I want to die” into Google and hit my blog. It was the most popular search term after “altucher”. The second most popular search term for people hitting my blog. “live sex”. Because, naturally, people don’t want to watch “dead sex”. Suicide is a form of pornography. It’s frowned on upon society. It’s taboo to talk about it. In fact, if you talk about it too much everyone will think you need to consult a therapist. Most people won’t admit they’ve ever experienced suicidal thoughts. And with good reason, pornography and suicide are often associated with crazy weirdos. There’s no real advice for people who want to die. You can’t say, “cheer up, bud, things get better.” Sometimes they don’t. You can check out this post to do a double-check and make sure that it’s not you that want to die but some feeling or situation inside of you. I can’t give advice on this other than the above post. But just ask yours, what would happen if you changed everything ?: A) Change your job B) Change your wife /relationship (but always take care of your kids) C) Change your friends (or double the time you spend with friends). Or make a new friend each day. Or contact an old friend. D) Never drink , smoke, do drugs E) Stop junk food F) Sell your house , move, downsize (anyone who is going to talk behind your back about you downsizing should die. Not you). G) Take up two hobbies you spend at least 2 hours a week each on. For me, I started taking chess lessons. And I’m still determined to do standup at some point. Or I want to take singing lessons. I started my “idea muscle” by thinking up jokes for a standup routine and then calling a friend in California who was a sitcom write and running them by him. One in ten were “decent” ! H) Stop talking to anyone who brings you down , even if it’s your family. Just stop. Don’t show up for family gatherings. Don’t show up for friend gatherings if they bring you down. Doesn’t have to be forever.Just a break. If they get upset then its their problem. But completely stop. Block them on facebook if you have to. (See my post, How Deal with Crappy People . I also have an upcoming post: How to Deal With a Crappy Boss] I) Read funny books. Don’t read depressing stuff, like the news. J) Once a day read a spiritual text. Like the Bible. Or the Tao Te Ching. Or a book by the Dalai Lama. It doesn’t matter. K) Say to yourself, “I’m going to save a life every day.” Sometimes that means you just smile at someone who didn’t expect it. Or you say, “you look good,” to a girl lost in their dreams walking on the sidewalk next to you L) Shower ever day . Guess what: in the shower there’s no phone, there’s no email, twitter, facebook, nobody wants you, and a side benefit: you get clean and you can daydream for awhile. M) Take the stair s instead of an elevator. Easy exercise. N) Write a diary . Don’t write a to-do list. That’s stressful. Why be so ambitious. You want to kill yourself. That sucks. Write about everything you actually did today. Every little detail. You did a lot more than you think. Write it as a facebook note even. Let your friends know what you did today. They will be impressed and inspired. O) If you think, “everything would be better off if I were dead” then think, “that’s really cool. Now I can do anything I want but I can postpone this thought for awhile, maybe even a few months.” Because what does it matter now? The planet might not even be around in a few months. Who knows what could happen with all these solar flares. You know the ones I’m talking about. P) Do the “‘NO’ TRICK”. If you find yourself thinking of that special someone who is causing you some grief then whisper in your mind, “no”. Then, everytime you think again of that person, whisper “no” a little louder. You may end up shouting “NO!” and everyone will think you’re crazy but that’s ok — you are crazy. You just typed “I want to die” into a search engine. That’s pretty crazy. This comes from the 70s pop psychology classic,”Don’t Say Yes When You Want to Say No”: Q) Sleep 8-9 hours a day. Even if you have to take medication to do it. For 15 years I woke up at 2am, anxious every day because of being an entrepreneur (that’s what entrepreneurs do). I had to take medication to sleep 7-8 straight hours. R) Tell someone every day that you love them (as long as they love you back, else DON’Ttell them).Doesn’t have to be romantic love. Can be friendly love. S) Don’t have sex with someone you don’t love. Anyway, this isn’t advice for the 4,722 people this past month who typed “I want to die” into Google and ended up on my blog. Maybe some of them need real help from a therapist or doctor. But this is what I did when I wanted to die. Every one of these things. And here I am. I am still alive. — Related: Follow me Twitter Buy my book, “I Was Blind But Now I See” – How to stop the brainwashing and learn to be happy.

Read the full article →

Poll: Majority Of Global Investors Back Buffett Rule

September 30, 2011

The majority of global investors support boosting taxes on households earning at least $1 million, according to a Bloomberg poll released Friday. Sixty-three percent of global investors said they support the so-called Buffett rule — named for billionaire Warren Buffett, who proposed raising taxes on the “super-rich” in an op-ed in The New York Times . American investors were less supportive than their colleagues around the world; forty percent backed the rule, according to the poll. But the majority of American voters are in favor of taxing the rich. Nearly three-quarters of Americans said they supported the Buffett rule , according to a poll released earlier this week by the website Daily Kos. Two-thirds of Americans also support raising taxes on households earning more than $200,000 , a recent Gallup poll found. And A majority of Republicans also support the rule, according to the Daily Kos poll. Still, the partisan rhetoric surrounding the measure may tell a different story. After Obama proposed the Buffett rule earlier this month as part of a larger plan to cut the national deficit using a combination of tax cuts and spending increases , Republican leaders accused him of stoking “class warfare.” In the op-ed, Buffett wrote that his tax rate is lower than that of everyone else working in his office . Buffett suggested raising tax rates on those making $1 million or more both as a way to “stop coddling” the rich and as a way to spur economic growth. Still, some argue that even if the Buffett rule were to survive and become law, it would do little to curb the budget deficit. Daniel Indiviglio of The Atlantic wrote earlier this month that if tax rates on the rich went back to pre-Bush-tax-cut levels they would bring in 4.5 percent of the 2009 national deficit. But many governments around the world think a Buffett rule-type law would help to solve their budget woes. France and England have boosted taxes on their wealthy , according to The New York Times , and Spain, Greece, Japan and Italy are considering doing the same. European investors had the highest level of support for the Buffett rule at 78 percent , the Bloomberg Poll found, while 69 percent of Asian investors back it. The Buffett rule may have less than half the support of U.S. investors, according to the Bloomberg poll, but it’s backed by one prominent American. Def Jam co-founder Russell Simmons told MSNBC on Thursday that he wants the U.S. government to raise his taxe s. The hip-hop mogul, who is worth an estimated $340 million, took a page out of Buffett’s book saying in the interview: “All my employees — every single one — paid more taxes than I did.”

Read the full article →

Bullard: Fed will act if economy weakens further

September 30, 2011

(Reuters) – The Federal Reserve will act if the economy weakens further and has the tools to do so, a top Fed official said on Friday. St. Louis Fed President James Bullard said he expects the economy to grow modestly over the next year — though the sluggish pace leaves it vulnerable to shocks. “Should economic performance deteriorate, monetary policy will respond,” Bullard said, according to slides of a presentation he was scheduled to make . “The Fed is not now, or ever, ‘out of ammunition’.” With interest rates near zero, Bullard said, the Fed can support the economy through inflation and inflation expectations and asset purchases are a “potent tool”. Dealers polled by Reuters earlier this month gave a median chance of 32 percent that the Fed will embark on a third round of quantitative easing. The Fed said last week it plans to buy $400 billion of longer-term Treasuries and sell the same amount of shorter-term Treasuries by the end of June 2012, in an effort to lower longer-term borrowing costs. It also said it would support the mortgage market by reinvesting principal payments from its mortgage-related debt into mortgage-backed securities. Bullard said policy should aim to be more rules-based than it has been since the crisis hit and return to a meeting-by-meeting approach by the Federal Open Market Committee. “The policy approach over the last several years, with announcements of large dollar amounts, fixed end dates, and rapidly changing tactics, seems fairly discretionary,” he said. “Returning to a more rules-based approach may provide needed stability to the U.S. macroeconomy.” Bullard repeated his view that promising to keep rates low for a specific period of time has a number of drawbacks, including the possibility of its hurting Fed credibility. He also warned against tying monetary policy to the unemployment rate, as Chicago Fed President Charles Evans has suggested. Unemployment rates have a “checkered history” in advanced economies over the last several decades, he said. In Europe over the last 30 years, for example, the unemployment rose and stayed high. “If such an outcome happened in the U.S. and monetary policy was explicitly tied to unemployment outcomes, monetary policy could be pulled off course for a generation.” (Reporting by Kristina Cooke in New York, Editing by Chizu Nomiyama)

Read the full article →

SEC Finds ‘Apparent Failures’ At 10 Credit Rating Agencies

September 30, 2011

WASHINGTON (Reuters) – The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission staff found “apparent failures” at each of the 10 credit rating agencies it examined, including Standard & Poor’s and Moody’s, the agency said on Friday in its first annual report of credit raters. The SEC staff said concerns include failures to follow ratings methodologies, failures in making timely and accurate disclosures and failures to manage conflicts of interest. The SEC’s annual report was required by last year’s Dodd-Frank financial oversight law. The staff report did not single out by name any credit-rating agency for questionable actions. It also said the SEC has not determined that any of the report’s findings constituted a “material regulatory deficiency” but said it might do so in the future. “We expect the credit rating agencies to address the concerns we have raised in a timely and effective way, and we will be monitoring their progress as part of our ongoing annual examinations,” said Norm Champ, deputy director of the SEC’s Office of Compliance Inspections and Examinations. The SEC’s report covers 10 credit-rating firms including Moody’s Corp, McGraw-Hill Cos Inc’s Standard & Poor’s and Fimalac SA’s Fitch Ratings. Congress first empowered the SEC to closely regulate the firms in 2006, and Dodd-Frank gave the agency even greater powers over the industry. Credit raters have been widely criticized for fueling the financial crisis by giving inflated ratings to toxic subprime mortgage securities. On Monday McGraw-Hill disclosed that the agency might charge its Standard & Poor’s unit with breaking securities laws. SEC Enforcement Director Robert Khuzami told Reuters this week that the agency faces hurdles proving wrongdoing at credit-rating agencies, pointing to the complexity of the cases and the industry’s strong legal defenses. (Reporting by Andrea Shalal-Esa, Aruna Viswanatha, Karey Wutkowski, editing by Gerald E. McCormick) Copyright 2011 Thomson Reuters. Click for Restrictions .

Read the full article →

NXP Strengthens Asian Presence With Appointment of Loh Kin Wah to Management Team

September 30, 2011

Former President and CEO of Qimonda AG Brings Over 30 Years Experience

Read the full article →

OCRI Hires New President to Execute on Ottawa’s Vision for High-Impact Economic Development

September 30, 2011

Bruce Lazenby Commits to Inclusive, Collaborative Approach to Make Ottawa the Number One City in Canada to Start and Grow a Knowledge-Based Business

Read the full article →

Action Products International, Inc. (APII) Appoints New Board Member; Aziz Ahmad Joins the APII’s Board of Directors

September 30, 2011

NEW YORK, NY–(Marketwire – Sep 30, 2011) – Action Products International, Inc. ( PINKSHEETS : APII ) today announced the appointment of Aziz Ahmad to the company’s board of directors.

Read the full article →

XcelMobility Introduces Executive Leadership

September 30, 2011

REDWOOD CITY, CA–(Marketwire – Sep 30, 2011) – XcelMobility Inc. ( OTCBB : XCLL ) (“Xcel” or the “Company”), a developer of high speed web browsing solutions and related products for mobile devices, is very pleased to introduce and welcome its executive leadership with the appointments of Mr. Ronald Edward Strauss to the position of Executive Chairman of the Board of Directors and Mr. Renyan Ge to the Board and as Chief Executive Officer.

Read the full article →

Rocket Fuel Expands Executive Team Amid Record Year of Global Growth

September 30, 2011

Leading Real-Time Ad Targeting Company Names Peter Bardwick as CFO and Hits $50M Run Rate Milestone

Read the full article →

Ram Power, Corp. Announces Selby F. Little as Acting Chief Financial Officer

September 30, 2011

RENO, NV–(Marketwire – Sep 30, 2011) – Ram Power, Corp. ( TSX : RPG ) (“Ram Power” or the “Company”), a renewable energy company focused on the development, production and sale of electricity from geothermal energy, announced today that John F. O’Neill has resigned as Vice President and Chief Financial Officer to pursue other opportunities. The Company has appointed Selby F. “Bud” Little as Acting Chief Financial Officer replacing Mr. O’Neill.

Read the full article →

China manufacturing eases for 3rd month, prices up

September 30, 2011

By Kevin Yao BEIJING (Reuters) – China’s manufacturing sector contracted for a third consecutive month in September, suggesting that the world’s second-largest economy is not immune to global headwinds, while factory inflation quickened. Growing signs of a slowdown in China have prompted concerns that the country that has been the motor of global growth in recent years will not be able to provide as much of a counterweight to faltering U.S. and European growth. The HSBC purchasing managers’ index (PMI), which previews business conditions in a range of industries before official output data, was at 49.9 in September, unchanged from August. The final PMI, released on Friday, was stronger than the flash reading published last week. “The PMI reinforces our view that the potential slowdown in China’s economy will likely be a gradual,” said Connie Tse, an economist at Forecast in Singapore. “The trade sector no doubt faces increasing risks, but recent export growth momentum is holding up decently. China is not facing a collapse in global demand yet, as witnessed in 2009.” The latest reading represents the longest period of contraction since the global financial crisis, when it came in below 50 for eight successive months from August 2008. In PMI releases around the world, the 50-point level typically demarcates expansion from contraction in factory activity. HSBC believes a PMI reading of as low as 48 in China still points to annual growth of 12-13 percent in industrial output and a 9 percent expansion in gross domestic product. “Although the lagged effects of credit tightening will continue to cool industrial activity in the months ahead, there remains little need to worry about a growth meltdown,” said Qu Hongbin, China economist at HSBC. Qu expects China’s economic growth to hold up at around 8.5-9 percent in the coming years, despite the global slowdown. But analysts at Bank of America-Merrill Lynch said in a report that China faces some systemic risks such as a property-market meltdown, bad debt and capital outflows. The warning triggered some widening China’s sovereign credit default swaps. The China Enterprise index of top mainland firms listed in Hong Kong fell 4 percent on Friday, with banks and developers sold off on fears of a property market correction. There are also concerns in some quarters that, after an investment splurge, China does not have the fiscal flexibility it possessed in 2008 and is less able to shrug off weakness elsewhere — a factor cited by consultancy Capital Economics when it last week cut its 2012 growth forecast to 8.5 percent from 9 percent. FADING DEMAND Earlier this month the IMF warned that, without action, the debt-mired economies of Europe and the United States could lapse into recession, prompting it to cut its 2011 and 2012 global growth forecast to 4 percent. Underscoring the global slowdown, a Japanese PMI survey on Friday showed September marking the first contraction in manufacturing activity in five months, as a bounce following a March earthquake in Asia’s second biggest economy faded. China, which has become a factory to the world, is especially vulnerable to fading demand from the United States and Europe, still its two biggest export markets despite its effort to diversify. Recent weakness in China’s currency against the dollar, where the offshore yuan is trading at a rare steep discount against the onshore rate, is evidence of overseas investors’ concerns about the outlook, analysts say. The HSBC survey’s new export orders sub-index remained below 50 for a fifth straight month, while the sub-index for overall new orders hovered below 50 for a second successive month. China’s exports in August pulled back from a record high and the pace of expansion slowed from the 37.7 percent rate recorded in January, government data showed. China’s annual growth tumbled to 6.6 percent in the first quarter of 2009 as exports took a hit from a slump in global trade. This time the slowdown so far has been modest and gradual, due to resilient domestic demand. Analysts believe China’s annual economic growth in the third quarter will be above 9 percent, slowing moderately from 9.5 percent in the second quarter. China’s official PMI, which is due to be published on Saturday, may have edged up in September, after a rise in the previous month from a 28-month low in July, driven by seasonal factors and domestic demand. The official PMI, which is weighted more toward big state firms, generally paints a rosier picture of Chinese factories than that of HSBC, which includes small private firms that have been hit harder by credit curbs and weaker demand. INFLATION BATTLE To the discomfort of Chinese policymakers, Friday’s data showed input costs rising rapidly, which could imply upward pressure on consumer inflation. Factory inflation in China quickened markedly in September, with the sub-index for input prices climbing to a four-month high of 59.5 in September from 55.9 in August. China’s annual inflation pulled back to 6.2 percent in August from a three-year high of 6.5 percent in July, and is widely expected to cool steadily for the rest of 2011. “The upstream price rises could trickle down to consumer prices at some point, but the impact won’t be big as global commodity prices have been falling,” said He Yifeng, economist at Hongyuan Securities in Beijing. Chinese leaders have repeatedly emphasized that fighting inflation remains the top priority despite the global malaise. The central bank is holding off further policy tightening amid jitters about a global downturn. But at the same time, it is unlikely to ease policy soon for fear of reigniting price pressures and an investment frenzy by local governments. Since last October, the central bank has raised interest rates five times and banks’ reserve requirement ratios — the percentage of cash deposits they must set aside in their vaults — nine times. (Editing by Alex Richardson and Ken Wills)

Read the full article →

Horizon Pharma Adds Two New Biopharmaceutical Executives to Its Board of Directors

September 30, 2011

NORTHBROOK, IL–(Marketwire – Sep 30, 2011) – Horizon Pharma, Inc. ( NASDAQ : HZNP ) today announced the appointments of Michael Grey and Ronald Pauli to the Company’s Board of Directors.

Read the full article →

Insight: Asia reshapes cocoa market

September 30, 2011

By Sarah McFarlane LONDON (Reuters) – To get an idea how emerging markets are reshaping global consumption patterns, look no further than the cocoa bean. Hundreds of millions of new consumers in Asia and elsewhere are boosting demand for chocolate cakes, biscuits, drinks and ice cream. This is increasing demand for cocoa, but it is also changing the cocoa market. When a cocoa bean is processed it makes roughly equal parts butter and powder. The butter goes into melt-in-your-mouth products, as well as soaps and cosmetics. The powder is used in cakes, biscuits and drinks. Until recently, suppliers had so much extra powder it was sometimes burned in boilers as a fuel. But over the last two years, powder prices have more than doubled; grinders can barely keep up. “In recent years powder demand has definitely outpaced butter demand, which has been based on the fact that most of the applications in emerging countries are powder-based,” said Jos de Loor, managing director of cocoa and chocolate at U.S. agribusiness Cargill. Global chocolate sales rose 2 percent to $83.2 billion in 2010, according to market research firm Mintel. This was helped by growth in places such as China, where sales rose 21 percent to $976 million, and Indonesia — the biggest chocolate-eaters in South East Asia — where sales climbed 26 percent to $888 million. Importantly, it was demand for powder which rose fastest. Singapore-based Petra Foods Limited, the world’s third-largest supplier of cocoa ingredients, estimates annual global cocoa butter consumption is now between 900,000 and 1 million tons, an increase from 850,000-900,000 tons two years ago. Demand for powder has risen faster, to 1.1-1.2 million tons from 800,000-850,000 two years ago. “In the past, emerging markets grew a lot but they were very small, so they didn’t affect the world market that much,” says Marcelo Melchior, head of confectionery at Nestle SA, the world’s biggest food group. “But now they are gaining critical mass and are continuing to grow, so it’s influencing the total market.” In some ways, the cocoa business is turning full circle. Chocolate first came to Europe from Latin America as a drink. Since 1828, when the Dutch worked out how to extract cocoa butter, chocolate products like bars, pralines and pastilles have been in the ascendant. People in North America and western Europe have been eating solid chocolate for more than a hundred years since it was sold to the public in mid-1800s Britain. Now emerging markets — particularly in Asia — are driving a taste for lighter treats. “If you consider eastern Europe and Latin America, the markets are much more established in the cocoa taste than in Asia,” Nestle’s Melchior said. “Culturally people are not as used to this flavor.” SWEET TOOTH You can plot the two-speed cocoa economy on a map. In the rich world, growth in chocolate sales is in the single digits according to Nestle. A bar of chocolate may be an affordable luxury, but it is proving less recession-proof than popular wisdom would have it. In emerging markets, though, growth is well into the double digits. In many parts of Asia, Latin America and eastern Europe, consumers’ first taste of chocolate is typically through milder products based on cocoa powder rather than chocolate bars. “A Kit Kat can be considered a lot of chocolate for the consumers in some emerging markets and in Europe it’s a lighter product where nobody gets concerned about the amount of chocolate,” said Melchior. Marc Donaldson, director of cocoa sustainability at Petra Foods, which has over 50 percent of the chocolate market in Indonesia, points out that powder products are “generally more within their budgets.” MELTING MOMENTS That could change. Higher prices for cocoa powder are probably here to stay. Global cocoa demand is on course to outstrip supply in 2011/12, as aging trees and a lack of investment in some of the world’s top producers limit production. Cargill has said that with average annual cocoa demand growth of 2.5-3 percent — around 100,000 extra tons of cocoa per year — there are likely to be serious supply concerns in the next few years. And it’s powder that’s poised to feel the squeeze most. Emerging market consumers might eventually develop a taste for richer, butter-based products, but that will take time. The hot climate, lack of widespread refrigeration and unreliable supply chains in a market such as India, for instance, make it a lot harder to keep butter-based products in good condition. “In cooler climates such as in eastern Europe, consumers have migrated from powder products to chocolate confectionery. In warm places like Asia and the Middle East, the migration to chocolate probably will be much less because chocolate melts in your hand,” says Steven Haws, of cocoa research firm Commodities Risk Analysis. The melt-factor can change how a product is made. Nestle’s Melchior says his company sometimes uses vegetable oil instead of cocoa butter in some markets, because it raises a product’s melting point so it can be more widely distributed. When Kraft Foods Inc bought British chocolate maker Cadbury in 2010, it gave the U.S. giant a foothold in India, where Cadbury was the largest confectioner. One of the first products Kraft launched there was Oreo biscuits — a powder-based product. BUTTER MOUNTAINS But it’s more than a story of increased demand for cocoa powder. Earlier this year, fighting in top cocoa producer Ivory Coast ignited fears of supply disruptions, and cocoa prices rallied to their highest in 32 years in March. Meanwhile the tough competitive environment for confectioners is hitting butter demand. Chocolate-makers have trimmed products to avoid having to pass on higher costs to consumers. Earlier this year Kraft quietly reduced the size of its Toblerone by one triangle and shrunk the iconic Cadbury Dairy Milk bar by two squares to 120 grams. “When a manufacturer reduces the size of a bar or the count in a bag, its action immediately reduces by a large amount the quantity of cocoa butter that the manufacturer buys,” said analyst Haws. He estimates a massive 150,000 tons of butter is stored around the world at present: working stocks are usually between 20,000 and 40,000 tons. As a general rule, powder and butter can both be stored for up to 18 months. “Some people have suggested that butter will find other uses if its price falls to $1,500 a ton. This might include replacing palm oil in some applications. However, that price is more than $1,500 away,” Haws said. COCOA LOCOMOTIVE At the moment, just 10 percent of the world’s cocoa is consumed in emerging markets, against 30 percent in North America and 40 percent in western Europe, according to Jonathan Parkman, joint head of agriculture at brokerage Marex Spectron. But in the future emerging markets “will continue to be the locomotive of growth. Cocoa demand has closely followed global GDP for over 50 years and we expect this to continue,” said Petra Foods’ Donaldson. The cocoa business has already gone through enormous changes over the centuries, reflecting broad historical shifts. For instance, even though cocoa was originally found in South America, as Europeans consumed more they increasingly used their newly colonized lands in Africa to grow the crop. Since the start of the 20th century, Africa has been the world’s biggest cocoa producer. The swelling middle class in China have seen their choice explode in recent years. Li Peng Fei, a middle-school teacher in Beijing, loves “dark chocolate; Dove and Ferrero are my favorites. When I was a child, the variety of food in China was not as abundant as today. My mum would buy me some cheap candies made of chocolate with alcohol in them. Now I prefer to buy ice cream and we have more choices.” As she eats more chocolate, expect prices to rise and the way the industry works to change again. (Editing by Simon Robinson and Sara Ledwith)

Read the full article →

Booming German firms cast nervous eye to euro crisis

September 30, 2011

By Noah Barkin and Brian Rohan GOETTINGEN, Germany (Reuters) – The euro zone crisis looms like a dark cloud over Europe’s biggest economy, but Stephan Gais can’t see it. Not for now at least. The 55-year old chairman of Mahr, a classic German “Mittelstand” firm that makes measuring instruments for the auto, engineering and medical sectors, had his best month ever in August, pulling in 18 million euros worth of new orders. He expects revenues to push above the 200 million euro mark for the first time next year, nearly double what the company hauled in at the height of the global financial crisis in 2009, when demand for Mahr’s high-precision products dried up overnight. “We aren’t feeling it at all,” said Gais, a big man with a booming voice whose great-great-grandfather, Carl Mahr, founded the company in 1861. “Naturally we are worried about the turbulence on financial markets, because in the end, the strength of the economy is 50 percent psychology. You can’t underestimate psychology. But we are very optimistic heading into next year,” he told Reuters at the company’s headquarters in Goettingen, a university town in central Germany. Like Mahr, the German economy bounced back sharply from the deep crisis triggered by the bankruptcy of U.S. investment bank Lehman Brothers three years ago. But signs are mounting that the rebound could be short-lived. German growth ground to a virtual halt in the second quarter of 2011 and leading economic indicators are painting a worrying picture. Last week a survey of purchasing managers suggested the country’s private sector was teetering on the brink, with business activity growing at its weakest pace in more than two years. The threats to Europe’s economic engine are multiple. Growth is slowing in many of Germany’s top export markets as governments rein in spending to bring down high debt levels. Turbulence on financial markets has also made companies and consumers nervous. And the euro zone crisis is a growing danger, as talk of a Greek default builds and investors pile pressure on big economies like Italy and Spain. MIX OF OPTIMISM AND UNCERTAINTY Still, a more nuanced picture emerged from interviews that Reuters conducted with a half dozen or so manufacturers from the German Mittelstand — the small- and medium-sized businesses, often family-owned, that form the backbone of the economy and employ roughly two thirds of its workforce. Many of these firms said they had used the crisis of 2009 to streamline production, make their staff more flexible and accelerate a push into faster-growing emerging markets like China and India. They held on to key employees by making use of the government’s “Kurzarbeit” short-time working scheme — state subsidies which encouraged firms to keep workers on reduced hours. That helped them respond quickly when demand returned. Thanks to longstanding relationships with local, cooperative banks, the Volksbanken, Mittelstand firms say they still have access to loans crucial for investment despite rising pressure on lenders to rein in credit because of the euro zone crisis. Gais at Mahr, for example, said he would seal a 5-year, 45-million euro credit line with a group of banks this week at an interest rate of just 3.5 percent. State bank KfW forecast last week that business investment in Germany would rise 9 percent this year and by 4.5 percent in 2012, fueled by real interest rates that are near historically low levels. Coupled with the optimism, however, is growing frustration with Chancellor Angela Merkel’s government and the sense that economic conditions could deteriorate rapidly, as they did after the Lehman collapse, if European leaders fail to act swiftly and decisively in countering their debt crisis. Merkel managed to staunch a rebellion in her center-right coalition on Thursday and secure parliamentary backing for an offer of more cash to back heavily indebted EU governments — but that alone will do little to shore up investors’ confidence. Michael Schneider of Hahn Automation, a 350-strong firm in the western state of Rhineland-Palatinate which builds custom robotics for factories, said the company’s order backlog would provide it with cushion through to mid-2012 and that it had encountered no problems getting funding. “But that could change quickly if things get worse in the euro zone periphery, or if banks get spooked into a credit crunch,” he said. Much depends on where firms get their revenues. Hahn is well placed because it relies heavily on Germany and exports to growing markets like eastern Europe, Turkey, Mexico and China. Less fortunate may be Aerzener Maschinenfabrik, a maker of twin-shaft rotary piston machines up the road from Mahr near Hamelin — the town of the legendary pied piper. The Aerzen firm has exposure to euro zone countries like Italy and Spain, where customers are holding back on making investments. “We are watching the euro crisis closely,” said Bernd Woehlken, a managing director at Aerzener. “We’re not seeing a direct impact, but we are seeing an indirect effect through delays in investment plans. The uncertainty is not good.” HOUSE OF CARDS Klaus Abberger, an economist at the Munich-based Ifo institute who oversees its monthly survey of 7,000 German firms, does not expect Germany to fall back into recession but says the economy could contract in the fourth quarter of the year. He says the biggest risks are a slowdown in the United States, Germany’s second biggest export market, and a deterioration of the euro zone crisis. Until now, investors have viewed Germany as a safe haven, pushing down interest rates for consumers and companies. Were the crisis to deepen however, for example through a Greek debt default that hit German banks, the country could lose its allure, with knock-on effects for the economy. Stephan Gais at Mahr believes the chief threat comes from Europe’s politicians themselves. He accused Merkel of adjusting her euro policy based on the latest opinion polls and polemics in the media, and savaged her coalition partners, the pro-business Free Democrats (FDP), whom he voted for in the 2009 election but now dismisses as a “total flop.” “They don’t have a plan for where they want to take Germany, where they want to take Europe,” Gais said. “I’m not at the point where I think we’ll relive what we experienced in 2009, the kind of recession we saw then. But one thing is clear — if Greece and Italy go bankrupt it will be much worse than Lehman Brothers. Then the house of cards will crumble,” he said. “It needs to be avoided at all costs and I’m hopeful the politicians can do it. In the end they need to make clear that they want Europe, that they want the euro, and how beneficial it has been for us.” (Editing by Alastair Macdonald)

Read the full article →

Australia’s 2010/2011 budget deficit USD47b

September 30, 2011

(MENAFN) Australia’s federal Treasurer, Wayne Swan, said that in 2010/2011, the country’s budget deficit reached USD47 billion, a little lower than previous forecasts of USD48 billion, reported …

Read the full article →

China’s Q4 coal output to increase notably

September 30, 2011

(MENAFN) China’s National Energy Administration’s deputy head of the coal department, Wei Pengyuan, said that in the fourth quarter, the country’s production of coal would grow notably meeting …

Read the full article →

US unsatisfied with UN’s budget cuts

September 30, 2011

(MENAFN) US representative for management and reform to the United Nations, Joseph M. Torsella, said that amidst the global financial crisis, the UN should of made more budget cuts to its USD5.2 …

Read the full article →

Global wine auctions, investments to slow in 2012

September 30, 2011

By Cathy Yang HONG KONG (Reuters) – Global wine auctions and investments will slow next year as the euro zone crisis and slowdown in the U.S. economy take their toll on the wine industry, but Asia may prove slightly more resilient, said Pancho Campo, a Spanish wine expert. Fears of a Greek default that have roiled the world’s financial markets and stubbornly high U.S. unemployment rates have had an impact on recent auctions, with none of the auction houses this month selling 100 percent of their lots. “I think the economy has something to do (with it),” said Campo, president of the Wine Academy of Spain, who is on a visit to Asian cities this week to promote a wine conference in Hong Kong later this year. Though he compared the slowdown to the time when the dot com and real estate bubbles burst, he said in an exclusive interview with Reuters TV that he felt a bit of cooling was inevitable. “(I am) starting to get the feeling that there was a bubble about wine investments and wine auctions. So for me, it’s a natural trend that it was to slow down,” he said. “I don’t think it’s just going to explode, I think the market will just slow down and the market will find its place.” Much of the recovery of the wine market in Europe will depend in large part on how fast the economies there recover and lift the uncertainty that its depressing the market. The United States was long a key market for Europe, but the slowing of the economy there as well has made many winemakers pin their hopes on Asia, he said — and rightly so. Wine collectors, particularly from Hong Kong, bought more than $200 million worth of fine wines at auction in the first half of 2011, nearly doubling the amount for the same period last year. Wine consumption in Asia has seen double digit growth over the past five to 10 years. Campo acknowledged that there is a “more positive” feeling in Asia, which he has visited eight or nine times. “I see that there are two tiers in Asia. You have the top tie where you find fine Bordeaux Chateau and the very expensive wines, and that has been very successful,” he said. “Then you have the lower tier where you have all the cheap stuff, where you have all the wines that sell for lower than 2 euros, 1 euro. In the middle, there’s the big gap.” He said that key for the future of the industry, particularly in places like Asia where the culture of wine needs to be developed, is to target the young people he termed “the millennials” — those aged 18 and 19 — and get them excited about wine. “Eventually they’ll go to university, they’ll become CEOS, doctors, architects and that’s the kind of people that you want involved in the wine industry,” he said. “They might invest, they might not invest, but if they become drinkers, they will drink regularly, and as they get more familiar with wines they will trade up and buy more expensive wines. That is the category that has to grow if the Asian wine trade wants to be successful.” (Additional reporting by Andy Ho; editing by Elaine Lies)

Read the full article →

Bank of America to charge debit card use fee

September 30, 2011

By Joe Rauch (Reuters) – Bank of America Corp plans to charge customers who use their debit cards to make purchases a $5 monthly fee beginning early next year, joining other banks scrambling for new sources of revenue. U.S. banks have been looking for ways to increase revenue as regulations introduced since the financial crisis limited the use of overdraft and other fees. The Dodd-Frank Act’s Durbin amendment, due to go into effect on October 1, caps fees banks can charge merchants for processing debit card transactions at 21 cents per transaction from an average of 44 cents, potentially costing banks billions of dollars. Banks also face broader operational challenges as low interest rates and higher capital requirements hit profitability, and the sluggish economy depresses loan demand. Other large U.S. banks including Wells Fargo & Co, JPMorgan Chase & Co and SunTrust Banks Inc are testing or planning monthly debit card fees. “The economics of offering a debit card have changed,” Bank of America spokeswoman Anne Pace said on Thursday. Bank of America is the largest U.S. bank by assets. Senator Richard Durbin, architect of debit card interchange fee reform, bashed the proposed monthly fee. “Bank of America is trying to find new ways to pad their profits by sticking it to its customers,” he said in a statement. It’s overt, unfair, and I hope their customers have the final say.” A FEE TOO FAR? Even before introduction of the Durbin amendment’s rules on debit fees, Bank of America’s fee income was dropping at its deposits and card services units. The bank’s deposits unit reported fee income of $1 billion in the second quarter of 2011, down 34 percent from $1.5 billion a year before. Card services, which includes the bank’s credit and debit card operations, reported fee income of $1.9 billion, down 23 percent from $2.5 billion in second quarter 2010. “This might be a fee too far,” said Ed Mierzwinski, director of the consumer program for the U.S. PIRG, a federation of state public interest research groups. Mierzwinski said such fees could push customers to smaller banks that have not introduced checking and debit-related fees. Pace said customers expect certain features for their accounts, like overdraft and fraud protection, and the fee would offset some of those costs. The fee will be waived for the bank’s premium or platinum privileges accounts tied to its Merrill Lynch brokerage. It will also not be charged for using the card to access the bank’s ATMs, Pace said. She declined to say how much the bank expects to earn through these fees or how many customers would be affected. Some banks have pushed back against debit fees. Citigroup Inc said earlier this month that it would not impose debit card usage fees as part of a broader account restructuring. The head of banking products for Citi’s U.S. consumer bank said customers had told the bank that a debit card fee would be “a huge source of irritation.” (Reporting by Joe Rauch in Charlotte, North Carolina, editing by Gerald E. McCormick)

Read the full article →

SGX, LSE in joint bid for London Metal Exchange: source

September 30, 2011

By Denny Thomas HONG KONG (Reuters) – The Singapore Stock Exchange Ltd is tying up with London’s main bourse to make a joint bid for the London Metal Exchange, a source told Reuters on Friday, as the world’s largest metal market seeks a suitor in a deal that could be worth 1 billion pounds ($1.57 billion). The consortium has appointed a bank to advise it on the bid, the source added, with the auction expected to attract rival offers. The joint bid underscores the ambitions of both exchanges to diversify into the fast growing space of metals trading, as traditional businesses of equity and derivatives trading faces increasing competition. Both the SGX and the LSE are coming off of failed merger attempts, which took place earlier this year amid a flurry of exchange auctions that were prompted by loss of market share across the industry to electronic trading and other platforms. The LME, the world’s biggest market for industrial metals, said last week that it was considering a sale, with an expected price tag of around 1 billion pounds ($1.57 billion). The number of suitors for the exchange has risen to double digits, Chief Executive Martin Abbott told Reuters on Thursday. SGX declined to comment. Calls and an email to the London Stock Exchange’s media hotline were not immediately answered. The source declined to be named as the discussions were confidential. SGX, led by experienced dealmaker Magnus Bocker, has been trying to raise the profile of Asia’s second-largest listed bourse and compete against its larger rival in Hong Kong. Bocker was the man who stitched together seven Nordic bourses to create OMX, later sold to NASDAQ . For a Newsmaker on Bocker. But his attempts to buy ASX Ltd was rejected by the Australian government just five months ago. LSE too had to face defeat in its pursuit of Toronto Stock Exchange after a consortium of Canadian banks launched a counter offer. The SGX-LSE combination is expected to face competition from other LME suitors, including CME Group Inc , the largest futures exchange in the United States, IntercontinentalExchange and UK-based broker ICAP , according to sources. “Joining hands with LSE gives them a good starting point in this process,” the source added. The LME, established in 1877 above a London hat shop, accounts for 80 percent of traded volume in global metal futures transactions. It saw record trading volumes last year of 120 million lots equivalent to $11.6 trillion and 2.8 billion tonnes of metal. Any deal would have to be accepted by 75 percent of shareholders, which include Goldman Sachs , J.P Morgan and trading firms including Amalgamated Metal Trading and Metdist. Pre-tax profit in 2010 fell 28 percent to 12.5 million pounds. (Additional reporting by Rachel Armstrong in SINGAPORE; Editing by Michael Flaherty and Jonathan Hopfner)

Read the full article →

Fast TARP exit meant less capital for some banks: U.S. audit

September 30, 2011

By David Lawder WASHINGTON (Reuters) – Some large U.S. banks would have stronger capital bases to better deal with today’s market stresses had regulators not relaxed bailout repayment criteria in late 2009, a new government audit showed on Friday. Bank of America Citigroup , Wells Fargo and PNC Financial were allowed exit the Troubled Asset Relief Program without raising as much equity capital as initially prescribed by the Federal Reserve, the TARP Special Inspector General said in the report. Following bank stress tests earlier in 2009, the Fed gave several banks guidance that they must raise $1 in common equity for every $2 in TARP bailout funds repaid — a formula meant to enable them to withstand future stresses. But this standard — which was never previously made public — was quickly relaxed, allowing Bank of America, Citi and Wells Fargo to repay taxpayers nearly simultaneously in December 2009, raising a combined $49.1 billion in equity capital. Enforcement of the $1 in equity for every $2 repaid guidance would have required $57.5 billion in equity capital to be raised by the three institutions. PNC was later allowed to exit TARP under similar relaxed guidance. “It’s certainly a missed opportunity to get these banks out of TARP with not only more capital but higher quality capital, which could have had long-lasting consequences in strengthening their capital base,” TARP acting special inspector general Christy Romero told Reuters. She said regulators “bowed” to pressure from the banks, who were keen to escape executive compensation restrictions associated with the bailout funds. But there was also pressure from the Treasury to allow them to exit TARP more quickly and repay taxpayers, she said. U.S. bank shares, particularly those of Bank of America, have been hit by funding concerns amid market turmoil this month and Moody’s Investors Service last week cut credit ratings for B of A, Citi and Wells Fargo. The SIGTARP report does not specifically address the current market concerns, but Romero said the original Fed exit guidance was aimed at providing ample and high-quality capital to absorb potential losses and demonstrate the banks’ viability to investors. “What you see today is the banks selling off assets. While that may raise capital, it’s a one-time hit, and also you’ve just lost potential sources of revenue generation,” Romero said. CAPITAL QUICKLY The report quotes U.S. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner as saying that Treasury pursued a “forceful strategy of raising capital early” to pressure on banks to sell shares sooner rather than later. “We thought the American economy would be in a better position if went out and raised capital,” the report quoted him as saying. Geithner often cites the U.S. bank stress tests and bank capital raisings of 2009 as a major source of strength for the U.S. financial system and is now pressing European policymakers to ensure their banks have adequate capital to withstand sovereign debt problems. Tim Massad, Treasury assistant secretary for financial stability, said taxpayers stand to earn more than $20 billion from bailout investments in U.S. banks. “Treasury wanted the major banks to raise private capital and repay taxpayers because that was necessary to restore stability and strength to the financial system,” he said. (Reporting by David Lawder, editing by Bernard Orr)

Read the full article →

Standard & Poor’s, Fitch downgrade NZ on growing debt

September 30, 2011

By Mantik Kusjanto WELLINGTON/NEW YORK (Reuters) – New Zealand suffered two ratings downgrades within hours on Friday when Standard & Poor’s and Fitch cut the country’s ranking by one notch over concerns about its growing foreign debt. Fitch moved first, marking New Zealand’s first downgrade in 13 years and sparking a sharp slide in the New Zealand dollar. Although bond yields are near record lows, the higher risk rating will add to funding costs and could delay when the Reserve Bank of New Zealand (RBNZ) resumes raising rates, analysts said. “It is likely to delay any official moves from the RBNZ and the risks are certainly becoming even more skewed toward a later start than our March expectations,” Goldman Sachs economist Philip Borkin said. S&P and Fitch cut New Zealand’s sovereign rating to double A from double A-plus, a level on par with Kuwait and Abu Dhabi. The rating is lower than Australia’s triple A rating but above Japan’s double A-minus. Both agencies classified the outlook for New Zealand as “stable.” New Zealand Finance Minister Bill English blamed the downgrades in part on sensitivity over the euro zone’s debt crisis, saying the government was cutting spending to get back to budget surplus by the 2014/15 fiscal year. “The timing is a little bit surprising given that New Zealand has made key progress in improving its imbalances, it’s the outlook where you cannot disagree with them,” Borkin said. New Zealand’s current account deficit narrowed to 3.7 percent of GDP in June from as high as 8.9 percent at the end of 2008. Foreign debt has fallen to 70 percent of GDP from 84.6 percent in March 2009, which compares to 60 percent in Australia. But both ratings agencies said they expected external debt to grow. Fitch, which had New Zealand on negative watch since 2009, forecast the current account deficit would grow to 5.5 percent of GDP by 2013. “New Zealand’s high level of net external debt is an outlier among rated peers — a key vulnerability that is likely to persist as the current account deficit is projected to widen again,” said Andrew Colquhoun, Fitch’s head of Asia-Pacific Sovereigns. The New Zealand dollar fell 1.5 percent after the two downgrades to a session low of $0.7638, most of decline coming after Fitch announced its downgrade. The currency later recovered to settle around $0.7660. Economists said they expected the rating cuts to increase New Zealand’s borrowing costs marginally since global bond yields are being capped by concerns about economic downturns in Europe and the United States. “We expect the impact of New Zealand’s international borrowing costs will be a marginal increase, perhaps 5-10 basis points, more so at the long-end of the curve,” said Deutsche Bank chief economist Darren Gibbs. DETERIORATE New Zealand’s government yield curve steepened, with the front end rising 6.5 basis points and the long end up 13.5 bps. But the rise also followed higher yields elsewhere. Global economic concerns have weighed on yields for the past two quarters. The 10-year bond yield of 4.455 percent is just above a record low of 4.228 percent on Monday. The central bank has held its policy rate at 2.5 percent for the past four reviews to help the economy rebound from the impact of two major earthquakes since September. At its last review on Sept 15, the central bank said it will not raise rates until global market volatility subsides. After the downgrades, financial markets pricing imply benign rate outlook, with only 30 basis points of tightening in the next year, little changed from the previous day. S&P said New Zealand’s strengths were its fiscal and monetary policy flexibility, economic resilience, public policy stability and a sound financial sector. But those strengths were moderated by high external imbalances, which were accompanied by high household and agriculture sector debt, dependence on commodity income as well as emerging fiscal pressures associated with an aging population. “New Zealand’s external position will deteriorate further at a time when the country’s fiscal settings have been weakened by earthquake-related spending pressures and fiscal stimulus to support growth,” said S&P credit analyst Kyran Curry. UNDER SCRUTINY English said New Zealand’s vulnerability to external shocks was less than it was back in 2008 when, ironically, the credit rating was higher. “We have been working to reduce the vulnerability as much as possible over the last two or three years and we have made quite considerable progress,” English said in a television interview. “Because of the problem with Italy and Spain, rating agencies are becoming much more hypersensitive to debt.” The other major rating agency, Moody’s, has New Zealand at triple-A with a stable outlook, but it focuses more on the level of government indebtedness, which at the end of May stood at a net 20.4 percent of GDP. The last time New Zealand’s credit rating was downgraded was in 1998, when Moody’s cut its rating to Aa2 from Aa1. New Zealand’s rating cut is the latest in a series of downgrades among high-rated developed countries — including the United States, Japan and Italy — which suffer from a growing debt burden and weak economic growth. “While these are volatile times, we are expecting global investors to be able to put this news in context and continue to support the NZ government bond market,” said Christian Hawkesby, head of fixed income at Harbour Asset Management. The current account deficit narrowed earlier this year to a 21-year-low of 2.5 percent of GDP, but is expected to keep swelling as a pick up in the economy fuels imports and higher profits for foreign investors. Public finances, which have traditionally been a rating strength, have also deteriorated in the past three years. The government’s plans to return to a budget surplus in the 2014/15 fiscal year may be delayed by the reconstruction costs for the Christchurch earthquake in February, Fitch said. (Additional reporting by Gyles Beckford, Walter Brandimarte, Chris Sanders and Wanfeng Zhou; Editing by Richard Borsuk)

Read the full article →

Biden Makes Huge Gaffe

September 30, 2011

Vice President Joe Biden told a Florida radio station Thursday that the Obama administration, not the Bush administration, is responsible for the state of the economy. “There’s a lot of people in Florida that have good reason to be upset because they’ve lost jobs,” Biden told WLRN’s Phil Latzman in an interview. “Even though 50 some percent of the American people think the economy tanked because of the last administration, that’s not relevant.” “What’s relevant is, we’re in charge. And right now, we are the ones in charge, and it’s gotten better but it hasn’t gotten good enough. And in states like Florida it’s even been more stagnant because of the real estate market,” Biden continued. “And so I don’t blame them for being mad. We’re in charge, so they’re angry.” Listen to the full interview here . In a Gallup poll earlier this month, a majority of Americans for the first time held Obama to blame for the economy. Biden stressed, though, that while Americans might blame the Obama administration for the economy now, the 2012 election would not simply be a referendum on the current administration, but a choice between Democrats and Republicans. “Right now — understandably, totally legitimate — this is a referendum on Obama and Biden and the nature and state of the economy,” Biden said. “It’s soon going to be a choice.” Asked about Biden’s comments, White House press secretary Jay Carney said Thursday that Obama was OK with election being a referendum on his record on the economy. “The president fully expects that when people cast their ballots in November of 2012, that they will be making their decisions based on their assessment of his record, what he’s done, what he’s accomplished,” Carney said. “And obviously comparing that and what his vision is for the future — which is critical as well — for where he wants to take the country going forward, and comparing that to whoever is the candidate for the Republican party. So the answer is, yes. It’s more than that, but, yes.” WATCH:

Read the full article →

Martha Burk: Congress Should Puncture This Cartel

September 30, 2011

It’s the scary season at the movies, and I don’t mean the usual spate of Halloween films that bombard us every October. Now playing in theaters nationwide is Contagion , the fictitious account of a mysterious and fast-spreading virus that’s killing millions around the world. There’s no vaccine in sight — until the heroine steps in and injects herself with an experimental antidote that works. Meanwhile civil order breaks down when misguided seekers of an herbal remedy storm pharmacies as police, fire, and health care workers go on strike out of fear. It’s an entertaining and slightly scary fantasy that comes out all ok in the end. Much more frightening is Puncture , already playing in New York and opening around the country next week. Unlike Contagion , Puncture is no fantasy. It’s based on the true story of Karen Daley, a nurse who died of AIDS after suffering a needlestick while giving an injection to a patient. The movie has plenty of villains, and most of them are wearing suits and ties. You may even recognize some of the types — they bear an uncanny resemblance to members of Congress. What does Congress have to do with movies, injections, and AIDS death? Plenty, as it turns out. Puncture exposes a very real medical cartel that’s not only needlessly taking lives like Daley’s, but costing you (yes you, the taxpayer) a lot more than the price of a theater ticket. Millions of dollars in fact. All perfectly legal, courtesy of your elected representatives on Capitol Hill. It’s a real life horror story, and here’s how it works. Hospitals of course use a lot of medical devices — everything from hypodermic needles and heating pads to cardiac stents, artificial hips, and pacemakers. They buy from a variety of manufacturers. And they want to get the most effective devices possible and at a fair price, right? Not exactly. Virtually all sales of medical devices to U.S. hospitals are controlled by a cartel made up of large Group Purchasing Organizations (GPOs). The GPOs represent a select group of suppliers, and only that select group. They go to hospitals and negotiate “sole source” contracts — meaning the hospitals agree to buy the products from the GPO-sanctioned companies — and no others. It doesn’t matter whether the chosen few actually provide the best devices for the intended purpose, or whether their products cost many times what the competition would charge. All that matters is that these anointed suppliers are on the GPO “list.” How does a company get on the list? You would think by making the most medically sound or cost-effective products. But you’d be wrong. It’s easier than that. Manufacturers that can afford it just pay a big fat fee to the GPO. Even if their “approved” devices cost a lot more, hospitals don’t much care, because insurance companies — including Medicare and Medicaid (e.g. taxpayers) — ultimately pick up the tab. (Insurance premiums have almost doubled in the last decade, and this crummy arrangement has got to be a big contributor.) And here’s the deal sweetener: at the end of the year, the GPO returns a dollar percentage of the contracts back to the hospital . If this scam sounds like a bald-faced kickback scheme, that’s what it is. Pay-to-play from the device manufacturers, followed by kickbacks to hospitals, resulting in bilking insurance companies and ultimately consumers. Nobody even tries to deny it, because Congress exempted GPOs from anti-kickback statutes in the 1980s, in what critics say was a direct violation of anti-trust law. In the past three decades there has been no serious effort to correct this gross fleecing of patients and taxpayers, event though research shows that $37.5 billion a year could be saved — much of it from Medicare and Medicaid — if competition were opened up. Right now the little guys can’t get past the GPO gatekeepers, even though they may have better devices. Puncture highlights one real-life example of a manufacturer with a safer, cheaper hypodermic that would have saved Daley’s life and many others (worldwide, needlesticks result in 1,300,000 deaths annually). He was shut out, threatened and intimidated. When none of that worked, the big boys tried to buy him out to shut him up. But the larger story is not just about needles — hundreds of faulty devices continue to be used in thousands of hospitals. Congress fiddles while people die. If our elected representatives don’t care about safety they ought to at least consider the bottom line, which many worship. Thirty-seven billion a year in savings is more than chump change, and it’s something the Congressional “super committee” to cut the deficit should take seriously. And candidates of all stripes are running hard on transparency and accountability. This is one way they could boost both — if they care more about real people than the corporate fat cats that contribute the big bucks. Wouldn’t hurt to ask them at the next town hall.

Read the full article →

Japan factory output disappoints; yen, global slowdown

September 30, 2011

By Leika Kihara TOKYO (Reuters) – Japanese factory output rose less than expected in August, in a sign that companies were feeling the pinch from a strong yen and faltering global demand and the economy’s swift rebound from the March 11 earthquake and tsunami was tailing off. Industrial output rose 0.8 percent in August from the previous month compared with a median market forecast of a 1.5 percent increase and a 0.4 percent gain in July, data from the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry showed on Friday. Manufacturers surveyed by the ministry expect output to fall 2.5 percent in September, but climb 3.8 percent in October. A purchasing managers’ survey for September, which marked the first contraction in manufacturing activity in five months, confirmed that the world’s No. 3 economy was losing momentum. “Overall production remains on a recovery trend but the momentum seems to be slowing, partly on weakening external demand,” said Yasuo Yamamoto, senior economist at Mizuho Research Institute. “I expect factory output will continue its moderate recovery this year as auto makers are still making up for production delays. But there is a chance that production may weaken after this period is over.” CAUTIOUS OVER OUTLOOK Output has rebounded sharply from a deep slump caused by the March 11 disaster as companies made strides in mending broken supply chains and factories. The government said production almost reached pre-quake levels, but voiced caution about the outlook. Both the yen’s strength and sagging growth in major export markets in Europe, which is caught in the throes of a sovereign debt crisis, and the United States have raised doubts about the strength of economic recovery in the months ahead. A bigger-than-expected 4.1 percent annual fall in household spending, weighed down by high energy costs and pessimism about economic prospects, showed consumer spending at home was too weak to pick up the slack. Friday’s data follow a slew of disappointing figures including a smaller-than-expected rise in last month’s exports and a surprising drop in retail sales, as well as downward revisions to July output and second quarter GDP. Japan’s auto industry remained one of the few bright spots as auto makers have maintained output to restock inventories overseas and orders yet to be met due to output delays caused by the earthquake. But the IT sector has been hurt by slowing global demand for personal computers and semiconductors. Toyota Motor Corp, the world’s biggest auto maker, said on Wednesday its exports rose 19.8 percent in August from a year earlier, with output in Japan during the month up 11.9 percent. Japan’s economy has emerged from a post-quake recession this quarter, but the bounce driven by retooling of damaged factories and recovering output is petering out faster than previously thought, prompting economists to trim their growth forecasts for the final months of the year. Fears of a global recession and persistent yen rises have cast doubt on the forecast shared by the government and the central bank that the Japanese economy is picking up, albeit amid heightening uncertainties over the outlook. The Bank of Japan is expected to ponder whether additional monetary easing will be necessary when it meets for a rate review on October 6-7, after it loosened policy in August to forestall risks to the outlook. (Additional reporting by Stanley White and Kaori Kaneko; Writing by Tomasz Janowski; Editing by Edmund Klamann)

Read the full article →

U.S condemns wages, in U.N’s new budget

September 30, 2011

(MENAFN) U.S. ambassador for UN management and reform, Joseph M. Torsella, said that Obama administration informed the United Nations that the number of the workers whose salaries were cut …

Read the full article →

Honda, Toyota to full production

September 30, 2011

(MENAFN) J.D. Power & Associates’ executive director, Jeff Schuster, said that Honda Motor Co. and Toyota Motor Corp. went back to their full production pushing U.S. cars sales back to their former …

Read the full article →

Investors should oppose Murdochs on News Corp board: fund group

September 30, 2011

MELBOURNE (Reuters) – An Australian pension fund group has called on its members to vote to remove several News Corporation board members, including James and Lachlan Murdoch, in order to ensure the independence of the board. The Australian Council of Superannuation Investors, which represents pension funds that manage A$250 billion ($244 billion) in assets, said in a statement that investors should vote against the two sons of chief executive Rupert Murdoch, and three other executives who have each served at least 20 years on the board due to their perceived close links to the founder. The annual shareholders’ meeting is on October 21. The council’s Chief Executive Ann Byrne said the phone hacking scandal at News Corp brought into question the effectiveness of oversight and risk management at the media organization. “Responsibility for this, as well as setting the ethical tone throughout News Corporation and affiliated organizations rests with the News Corporation Board,” Byrne said. She said a clear message needed to be sent to the board, even though there was little prospect that the current directors would be voted down at the upcoming shareholders’ meeting. A Murdoch family trust controls about 40 percent of the voting shares. A spokesman for News Corp’s Australian arm, News Ltd, could not be immediately reached for comment. (Reporting by Victoria Thieberger; Editing by Ed Davies)

Read the full article →

Russell Simmons: ‘Every Single One’ Of My Employees Pays More Taxes Than Me

September 30, 2011

Famed investor Warren Buffett and Def Jam co-founder Russell Simmons have at least one thing in common: They both want the U.S. government to raise their taxes. “All my employees — every single one — paid more taxes than I did,” Simmons told MSNBC’s Martin Bashir on Thursday in a segment highlighted by Think Progress. “We need to make the rich pay their fair share.” This is the second time in as many days that Simmons, whose estimated net worth is $340 million , has called for the federal government to raise taxes on America’s wealthiest citizens. By doing so, he stands alongside Warren Buffett, the third-richest man in the world, who in August similarly called for raising taxes on the rich in a New York Times Op-Ed. Simmons also issued the request in a blog post on Wednesday. “I believe in a nation where everyone gets a fair share of the fruits of our labor and where everyone pays a fair share for what they receive,” he wrote on his site . “I am asking the United States government to raise my taxes and not allow the Republicans to use this economic recession as an opportunity to strip the basic programs that protect our most vulnerable.” Asked by MSNBC’s Bashir whether raising taxes on the wealthy would threaten an already weak recovery, Simmons was unfazed. “I hired based on pre-tax profit, not post-tax,” said Simmons, author of Super Rich: A Guide to Having it All . He continued: “We need to organize all the working class and underserved communities to go to work to fight off this money grab… that a great number of the [rich] corporations and individuals to undermine opportunities to give opportunity and resources to the poor.” Simmons has used multiple platforms to get across his message. On Wednesday, he joined the Occupy Wall Street protests in downtown Manhattan , according to Mogulite. And most of the country would seem to agree with the drive to raise taxes on the rich. In a recent survey, nearly three-quarters of all respondents — and two-thirds of Republicans — said they would support President Obama’s proposal to tax millionaire households at the same rate as the middle class. The rule was unveiled in early September as part of a larger package including other tax increases and spending cuts. If enacted, it would apply to roughly 60,000 people , according to The New York Times .

Read the full article →

David Isenberg: Name Calling and Double Standards

September 29, 2011

In my last post I wrote about the report, Bad Business: Billions of Taxpayer Dollars Wasted on Hiring Contractors , released by the Project on Government Oversight. The bottom line of the report was that: The current debate over pay differentials largely relies on the theory that the government pays private sector compensation rates when it outsources services. This report proves otherwise: In fact, it shows that the government actually pays service contractors at rates far exceeding the cost of employing federal employees to perform comparable functions. As one would expect those who work in and advocate for private contractors were not pleased. All well and good; everyone is entitled to their opinion. But the way some on the pro-contractor side has responded says more about their own lack of empirically proven facts than any failings on the part of the POGO report. But before going any further let me explain exactly what dog I have in the privatization/outsourcing fight. I started following the issue of the use of private military and security contractors (PMSC) in the early ’90s. Back then, as now, advocates would assert that when it came to doing work traditionally done by the U.S. government that PMSC were the equivalent of the Bionic Man, that they could it do quicker, more efficiently and effectively and at lower cost. It is an appealing argument and on the surface makes a lot of sense. After all, all of us can think of things that we want private sector professionals, and not the government, to do. But what I also noticed was the PMSC advocates rarely pointed to any methodologically rigorous, empirically proven studies that confirmed their view. Either they just said, over and over and over, that it is common sense, or pointed to studies in other areas of privatization that showed cost savings and claimed it would happen in the military sector also, or pointed to something like private contractors mowing the grass or building housing on military bases, as if that was the same as guarding a convoy on Route Irish in Iraq. Don’t get me wrong. I’m not saying that using PMSC isn’t cost-effective, at least some of the time. I am saying that the work substantiating the blanket claim made for them has not been done. And given how much money sloshes around the PMSC industry it is rather telling, at least in my view, that people there, if only for the purpose of public relations, haven’t bothered to hire a couple of economists to do a few studies on the subject. Anyway, back to the POGO report. Shortly after it came out, the International Stability Operations Association , a PMSC trade group, whose motto, to borrow from the classic Superman TV show slogan, can be described as stability, human security, and the private sector way, sent me an email suggesting that I write about an analysis of the POGO report by the Professional Services Council. The PSC is a major trade group for private governmental services contractors. The email called it, “PSCs rather devastating response to the POGO report.” Well, call me cynical if you like but I am not devastated. The PSC two-page analysis — wow, two pages, count ‘em — which you can find here says: An open and honest dialogue about the costs of government operations is important but any such discussion must be based on facts. And the fact is that POGO’s report draws false conclusions by comparing fully burdened contractor rates — which include all costs charged to the government, such as salaries, benefits, overhead, supplies, equipment, materials, rent, and more — to an estimate of just salaries and benefits paid to a similar government workforce. Their analysis ignores the full range of overhead and other non-personnel costs that drive the cost to the taxpayer for federal employee performance,” said PSC President and CEO Stan Soloway. “This also helps to explain why POGO’s conclusions run so contrary to those of numerous other studies by other entities, such as the Commission on Wartime Contracting. Well, that is a rather interesting assertion to make, considering the CWC final report doesn’t actually say that. What it does say is that considerable cost savings are achieved only when using local or third-country nationals. But it also says “For the balance of activities that rely on contractor support using U.S. citizens, the cost advantages of contracting versus performing the function using military or federal civilians is less clear.” (Appendix F, p. 235, CWC final report). Furthermore, it is not true that POGO’s conclusions are antithetical to that of the CWC final report. As POGO subsequently noted : POGO is not alone in finding that contractors can be more expensive than federal employees. Recently, the Commission on Wartime Contracting (CWC) and the Defense Department issued reports that largely support our findings. The CWC found (see p. 226) that money could be saved in certain high-skill positions if the work was performed by federal civilian personnel. And, despite DoD’s recent flip-flopping on insourcing, last week it released a report finding that 50 percent (see p. 5; full report) of its FY 2010 insourcing was conducted because the work could be “more cost effectively delivered by civilian personnel of the Department. Is, in fact, the POGO report, bad analysis? It may not be perfect but I doubt it is as bad as PSC makes it out to be. Consider the first point it makes: By POGO’s own admission, its analysis has gaps. Despite POGO’s efforts to minimize their significance, the gaps are in fact important and relevant. For example, POGO states that its assessment of contractor costs primarily relied on pre-negotiated labor rates from the General Services Administration’s Multiple Award Schedules. However, those rates are the maximum a company offers and do not represent what the government actually pays. When contracts are competitively bid, GSA rates are often significantly discounted. So POGO’s study has gaps? Gasp, the horror! Oh, wait a minute. Don’t all respectable, academically sound studies, start with the premise that not all relevant information on the subject being analyzed is known and that there are always gaps and uncertainties. Only those who believe in God, and similar fairy tales, believe that all information is knowable. And I’m pretty sure that neither POGO, nor PSC for that matter, is omniscient. POGO’s subsequent response makes PSC’s critique look weak. ○ Industry Complaint: POGO unfairly used contractor loaded rates — rates that include salaries, benefits, administrative costs, profits, etc. POGO Response: We would love to see contractor cost or pricing data. If they would lay those cards on the table that would be wonderful. Unfortunately, the last seventeen years of so-called “acquisition reform” having been primarily about keeping important data away from government contract negotiators-data that would lead to better negotiation outcomes and more informed contract pricing. If rates are so much lower, as claimed by the Professional Services Council, than GSA should list both the ceiling prices and the actual prices negotiated to ensure that all government agencies are aware of current sales trends. But, what matters for the purposes of the current POGO report, is the cost to the government to contract with the company(ies) for the services studied. And that’s what we analyzed. ○ Industry Complaint: POGO’s analysis was flawed because it did not include all government overhead and lifecycle costs for federal employees. POGO Response: All additional overhead was excluded, including the government’s overhead rate to award, administer, and oversee contractors which would be in addition to the billing rates paid by agencies. If we added the government’s overhead costs for federal employees, we would need to do the same for situations when the government used contractors to perform the work. Even assuming POGO had added the standard OMB A-76 12% “overhead” rate, this would not have changed the results of the study. Incidentally, we intentionally only used billing rates for contractors operating out of federal government facilities to more closely keep our comparison apples — to apples. … However, the PSC, like ISOA is a trade group, not a group of dispassionate, objective academics, so it is entitled to spin the facts anyway it wants. What was more interesting was the mention of the POGO report in ISOA’s Weekly Digest . It mentions both the CWC and the POGO report. On the CWC report it says “The eye-popping $31-60B [fraud and waste] numbers are surely exaggerated,” although it offers no specifics on how and why that might be. It also said, “Thus far the breakdown of the $30 — $60 billion figures have yet to be specifically identified. Evidently ISOA’s crack analysts didn’t bother to read page 90, which said “The Commission’s estimate of a 5 percent to 9 percent fraud rate would indicate that between $10.2 billion and $18.5 billion of the $206 billion in funds spent for contingency contracts and grants has been lost to fraud.” More bothersome, however, is this language, “POGO’s far more partisan attack on contractors focuses more on their domestic utilization but unfortunately they cherry-pick specific tasks that favor their conclusions, annualize compensation for services that are utilized for temporary requirements, and ignore the value of exploiting outside expertise to achieve governmental goals.” Cherry-pick? That is pretty funny. Last time I checked, cherry-picking was more commonly used by neo-cons and free market apostles like past vice president Dick Cheney, former head of Halliburton. Anyone remember the threat of Iraqi WMD? It’s a dead give away that a case is weak when one side calls the other names, instead of disputing actual facts. It is particularly unfortunate for ISOA to do this, as it knows what it is like to be on the receiving end of ad hominem attacks. It has frequently, and rightfully, protested in the past when people call private security contractors mercenaries. As I have noted many times in the past private security contractors may not fit nearly into the existing international law pigeonholes but they are quite clearly not mercenaries. I’ve agreed with ISOA in the past when they have protested such characterizations. It is sad that it weakens its credibility by using a double standard.

Read the full article →

Marcie Pitt-Catsouphes, Ph.D.: A Family’s Work Is Never Done

September 29, 2011

National Work and Family Month is a time for employers, managers and employees to take a close look at whether we’re doing enough to support the work that employees do at the workplace and at home. As part of this reflection, it would behoove each of us to step back and think for a moment about what we mean when we say “family.” Most Americans now recognize that “family” is a complex concept that can include diverse family structures such as single parents, LGBT couples, and extended families. Unfortunately, for all of this talk about family diversity, when we think of family, many of us still picture people within a certain age bracket; we tend to think about 30- to 40-something parents with young children. However, it’s not only parents of young children who seek work-family balance and yet experience high degrees of work-life conflict. Work-family issues remain meaningful across the life course. Family responsibilities don’t end the day the kids go off to kindergarten — or the day they go off to college, either. The current economic downturn with high unemployment rates has precipitated a dramatic increase in the number of young adults who move back home with their parents, with some estimates suggesting that as many as one of every five 25- to 34- year-olds live with their parents. Whether or not they have children living at home, the parents of many young adults today provide financial support, help with heath care, and other types of assistance to adult children who are well into their twenties. Although the specific nature of work-family challenges may change, work-family issues remain relevant to these young adults and their parents (who are, of course, the older adults). Our country’s population is rapidly aging, and more employees have elder care responsibilities than ever before, with approximately 4 of every 10 employees reporting that they have provided some elder care ‘within the past 5 years.’ In some instances, these are the same people who are still handling childcare responsibilities, creating a phenomenon known as the sandwich generation — people whose years spent caring for children overlap with years caring for their aging parents. The large number of young men and women coming back from the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan with high needs for family support has also re-framed work-family experiences as multi-generational issues. Military families know that it’s not only service members who put in time and commitment for their country, but also spouses, parents of service members, and even their children. This commitment becomes even larger when the extended family becomes involved in care provided to a wounded veteran. If we expect these new American families to remain strong and successful, we must ensure that families — all families — get the support they need. During National Work and Family Month, employers should take the time to examine whether their workplaces are designed to support all families — wherever they are in their life course. While many of the work-life policies offered by companies are available to employees of all ages, often times they are designed with parents of young children in mind. Leading companies have started to address the age-diversity of families by offering options and supports like flexibility programs. Some of these, like phased retirement, have been designed for employees of specific ages or those at particular career stages. Other employers have recognized that the quality of jobs and paying attention to excessive work demands can help employees of all ages with work-family balance. Preliminary research by the Sloan Center on Aging & Work suggests that for older workers especially, excessive workload can undermine the positive effect of job quality on satisfaction with work-life balance. They say that a mother’s work is never done. Well neither is a father’s — or a grandparent’s… or a child’s or a grandchild’s. That’s true today more than ever before, and we need workplaces that acknowledge the range of family responsibilities which extend across our adult years. On a personal level, we understand that family relationships (and responsibilities) last a lifetime. We are desperately in need of workplace policies that take the life course perspective seriously.

Read the full article →

Jared Bernstein: Our Economic Policy Is Up a Creek With a Paddle

September 29, 2011

It’s one thing to be up the creek without a paddle. It’s quite another to be stuck up the creek with a paddle that you can’t use. The latter describes where we are in terms of economic policy. The Federal Reserve is trying to do their part with more easing of interest rates, but absent more action on the fiscal side, like the measures in the president’s jobs plan, I don’t expect anyone much to take advantage of lower rates. What’s missing is demand, customers, orders, projects that inspire investors to come in off the sidelines. In other words, I think that at a time like this, sequencing matters when it comes to monetary and fiscal stimulus, and fiscal needs to go first… without more demand, I fear we’re unlikely to see the incentive of lower rates gain more traction. So what’s blocking the fiscal push, as in the jobs plan? A friend of mine (hat-tip JB) reminded me of this interesting albeit disheartening analysis by James Surowiecki (by the way, in my honest opinion this dude writes a consistently excellent weekly economics column for the New Yorker ). His answer to the above question is, of course, Republicans (though I must say, I haven’t seen nearly enough push from the Democrats either on the jobs plan), but that begs another question: why is it politically costless for Republicans to go to the do-nothing, or worse (austerity!), place on jobs? Again, the obvious answer is that what hurts the president helps his opponents, but doesn’t that tactic put them in the position I started with: stuck up a creek but not using your paddle to get out? In order to seal that part of the deal, the Republicans have to argue that the paddle doesn’t work — worse, it’s a wasteful, expensive paddle that we should put through the wood-chipper. And that argument has been made much easier for them by the fact that nobody does “counterfactuals” — what would likely have occurred absent the stimulus. The Recovery Act passed and unemployment got higher. It would have gone higher still without the Recovery Act — that’s a consensus among non-partisan experts — but that’s an awfully hard hand to play. It’s true that the administration (of which I was a member) made our hand even tougher by underestimating how high unemployment would go, by talking about “green shoots” too soon, and by not taking out enough “Rogoff/Koo insurance” — extra stimulus in the pipeline in light of the long, hard slog characterized by financially driven, balance-sheet recessions . No matter what we did, however, the president faced a timing problem that was in this regard even tougher than FDR’s in the Great Depression: President Obama got there as the storm was breaking (GDP contracted by 9% the quarter before he took office); FDR took the stage when the storm had been upon the land for years already. The unemployment rate was 8.5% in January 2009; 10.6% a year later… In 1933, it was already above 20%. As Surowiecki puts it: … voters are more likely to hold politicians accountable for economic conditions when there’s “clarity of responsibility” — and responsibility for the economy now belongs to Obama and the Democrats. The recession started long before Obama took office. But, from a voter’s perspective, he had two years with sizable majorities in Congress to do something about it. While the 2009 stimulus plan succeeded in making the recession less awful than it might have been, you rarely get credit in politics for what didn’t happen… If you try to fix it, it’s yours. For the opposition, this dynamic means sitting on your hands is the optimal strategy: Coöperating on a bill would make it harder for them to disclaim responsibility for a weak economy at election time. They need to do enough to seem as if they cared about unemployment but not so much that they get blamed for it. Unless, of course, you actually want to help people-to help them get back to work, to stay in their homes, to begin to build the incomes back up. Silly, I know. Being stuck up a creek just looks a whole lot better to one side right now, and it’s hard to see what would make them use the paddle for anything other than whacking everybody around. This post originally appeared at Jared Bernstein’s On The Economy blog.

Read the full article →

PMAC Lending Services, Inc. Announces New CEO Appointment

September 29, 2011

CHINO HILLS, CA–(Marketwire – Sep 29, 2011) – PMAC Lending Services, Inc. (“PMAC”), a leading provider of mortgage banking services to consumers, mortgage brokers, real estate and financial service professionals, announced the appointment of Brian Witham as the Chief Executive Officer of PMAC, effective immediately.

Read the full article →

Liz Claiborne wins dismissal of investor lawsuit

September 29, 2011

NEW YORK (Reuters) – Liz Claiborne Inc on Thursday won the dismissal of a shareholder lawsuit accusing the clothing designer of fraudulently misrepresenting its relationships with department store chains Macy’s Inc and J.C. Penney Co , causing its stock to fall. U.S. District Judge Richard Holwell said the investors failed to show that Liz Claiborne intended to mislead them about the relationships. The class period ran from January 16 to April 30, 2007, the day before Liz Claiborne reported much lower-than-expected profit and sales at department store chains. A lawyer for the plaintiffs did not immediately respond to a request for comment. (Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York; Editing by Gary Hill)

Read the full article →

Seriously Delinquent Mortgages Again On The Rise

September 29, 2011

WASHINGTON – Borrowers are making their mortgage payments on time more frequently compared to a year ago, but delinquency rates remain elevated as government efforts to help homeowners fail to keep pace with job losses that push more homeowners toward foreclosure. At the end of the second quarter of this year, 88.0 percent of U.S. mortgages were current, a slight deterioration from 88.6 percent in the previous quarter but an improvement from 87.3 percent a year ago, according to a report from the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency. The second quarter reading marks an improvement from the percentage of loans that were current and performing by the end the 2007-09 financial crisis, according to the OCC. The percentage of current loans fell for seven consecutive quarters leading up to the end of 2009, when 86.4 percent were current at that time. Seriously delinquent mortgages that are 60 days or more past due rose to 4.9 percent in the quarter through June 30 from 4.8 percent the previous period, following five quarters of improvement. Seriously delinquent loans were down from 6.1 percent a year earlier. Bruce Krueger, a mortgage official at the OCC, said seasonal factors may have been the reason for the mortgage delinquencies picking up from the first quarter and might not be directly related to weakness in the economy. He said delinquencies are often low in the first three months of the year and show a pattern of inching up by about 0.2 percent to 0.5 percent by the end of the second quarter. “We’re right in line with what we normally see as the increases in the first and second quarters,” Krueger said. He cautioned that the OCC is paying close attention to the pick-up as the year proceeds to gauge if there are economic factors impacting delinquencies, such as high unemployment. The number of borrowers involved in foreclosure proceedings increased by 0.9 percent during the quarter. However, first-time foreclosure filings on the loans decreased 8.0 percent from the first quarter to 287,145, the report said. Regulators caution foreclosures remain high by historical standards. Loans are being modified by servicers to make them more affordable through government programs and industry initiatives. Servicers modified 2.08 million loans from the beginning of 2008 when the housing bubble burst through the end of the first quarter of 2011, the report noted. The modifications were not all successful, with 9.2 percent 30 to 59 days delinquent, and 18.2 percent “seriously delinquent” by the end of the second quarter. The OCC survey covers 32.7 million loans, which have $5.7 trillion in principal balances. These figures represent 63 percent of outstanding U.S. mortgages. (Reporting by Margaret Chadbourn, Editing by Andrea Ricci) Copyright 2011 Thomson Reuters. Click for Restrictions .

Read the full article →

Lehman bankruptcy payout plan gains momentum

September 29, 2011

By Nick Brown NEW YORK (Reuters) – With more than $140 billion worth of claimholders now supporting its proposed bankruptcy exit plan, Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc’s prospects for getting the plan approved by the end of the year are brightening. Three months ago, the fallen investment bank was in a battle for control of its bankruptcy with creditors who had their own ideas for how assets should be allocated. But after a string of successful negotiations with those creditors, including Wednesday’s accord with Bank of America Corp and its Merrill Lynch unit, many of Lehman’s largest creditors now support a plan that will give creditors $65 billion, on average roughly one-fifth what they are owed. “It certainly looks like they’re moving in the direction of a largely consensual confirmation hearing,” said Stephen Lubben, a professor at Seton Hall University School of Law. That is not to say confirmation will be a breeze, Lubben said. Lehman, the largest Chapter 11 debtor in history, may still be in for a “laborious” hearing, he said. “But if you’re taking the big creditors off the table, the hope is you’ll only have to deal with a handful of objections from smaller ones,” he said. A Lehman spokeswoman on Thursday said about 50 large creditors with $140 billion of claims now support its plan. Bank of America and Merrill agreed to support the plan and reduce their derivatives claims against Lehman by $7.5 billion — about $4 billion in underlying claims and another $3.5 billion in guarantee claims. Lehman touted the deal in the context of its larger effort to resolve disputes with big bank derivative counterparties. “When we set out to create the derivatives settlement framework, we were hopeful that we could successfully bring the big banks to the table … and avoid litigation,” Daniel Ehrmann, Lehman’s co-head of derivatives, said in a statement. “This motion today … brings the total banks with which we have settled to 10 of 13,” Ehrmann said. Among the other creditors who back Lehman’s plan are bondholders led by hedge fund Paulson & Co, and other large banks with derivatives claims, such as Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs Group Inc . If enough creditors vote to approve Lehman’s reorganization plan in a November 4 ballot, it will go before a bankruptcy court for a confirmation hearing beginning December 6. Court confirmation could allow it to exit bankruptcy and begin payouts in the first quarter of 2012. Lubben said the bank has every incentive to emerge from bankruptcy as soon as it can. “If the plan is confirmed and creditors appeal, there’s a better chance those appeals will be denied if the plan has already been implemented and distributions have begun,” he said. Lehman’s $639 billion bankruptcy in 2008 was a major catalyst of the financial crisis. Its thousands of creditors have asserted well over $300 billion in total claims. The case is In re Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc, U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of New York, No. 08-13555. (Reporting by Nick Brown, editing by Matthew Lewis)

Read the full article →

Japanese economy under pressure during the period 

September 29, 2011

Japanese economy witnessed a first drop for its retail trade in three months as Japan’s economy is in a critical phase these days amid the current events that threaten the global economic growth …

Read the full article →

Asian Activities Report for September 29, 2011: Red Mountain Mining (ASX:RMX) to Follow Up Significant Gold Mineralisation at Zhongqu Project Stage II Drilling in China

September 29, 2011

http://www.abnnewswire.net/rss2/menafn/abn_menafn_en.asp Red Mountain Mining Limited (ASX:RMX) will commence a Stage II underground drilling program on 29 September 2011 at the Zhongqu project in …

Read the full article →

France- Sarkozy slides in Poll, trails socialists

September 29, 2011

(MENAFN – Saudi Press Agency) President Nicolas Sarkozy’s popularity slid back toward record lows this month, according to a poll on Tuesday which showed him distantly trailing Socialist rivals for …

Read the full article →

Europe Ahead: Data back in focus as fears over growth might return as the rally loses momentum   

September 29, 2011

The market enjoyed a good run since the beginning of the week on hopes the European leaders are capable and working on means to contain the debt crisis with support from positive votes on expanding …

Read the full article →

USD To Maintain Upward Trend, Euro Threatened By ECB Rate Decision

September 29, 2011

DJ FXCM Dollar Index Index Last High Low Daily Change (%) Daily Range (% of ATR) DJ-FXCM Dollar Index 9896.95 9950.48 9888.11 -0.28 67.62% The …

Read the full article →