October 2011

China’s Haier, UK’s Home Retail‎ to form JV

October 20, 2011

China’s Haier, UK’s Home Retail‎ to form JV

Read the full article →

Centenarian sets record by running a marathon

October 20, 2011

Centenarian sets record by running a marathon

Read the full article →

Man arrested for conducting exit poll

October 20, 2011

Man arrested for conducting exit poll

Read the full article →

Swedish bird catcher convicted of animal cruelty

October 20, 2011

Swedish bird catcher convicted of animal cruelty

Read the full article →

Woman accused of using power saw on husband

October 20, 2011

Woman accused of using power saw on husband

Read the full article →

Death row dog missing from Oregon pet hotel

October 20, 2011

Death row dog missing from Oregon pet hotel

Read the full article →

Colombian women end ‘crossed legs’ protest

October 20, 2011

Colombian women end ‘crossed legs’ protest

Read the full article →

EU Commission proposes USD68.9b infrastructure package

October 20, 2011

EU Commission proposes USD68.9b infrastructure package

Read the full article →

Self-discipline is key to well-being

October 20, 2011

Self-discipline is key to well-being

Read the full article →

American Express Q3 profit up 13% to USD1.24b

October 20, 2011

American Express Q3 profit up 13% to USD1.24b

Read the full article →

Global wealth surges to $231 trillion

October 20, 2011

Global wealth surges to $231 trillion

Read the full article →

South Korean, Japanese leaders support closer business ties

October 20, 2011

South Korean, Japanese leaders support closer business ties

Read the full article →

US federal reserve: economy growing slowly

October 20, 2011

US federal reserve: economy growing slowly

Read the full article →

China’s Yuan Strengthens against USD Wednesday

October 20, 2011

China’s Yuan Strengthens against USD Wednesday

Read the full article →

Tokyo Stocks Ends Slightly Up Wednesday

October 20, 2011

Tokyo Stocks Ends Slightly Up Wednesday

Read the full article →

African Development Bank Receives Loan from Japan

October 20, 2011

African Development Bank Receives Loan from Japan

Read the full article →

OPEC Crude Drops USD 2.19 to USD 107.94 pb

October 20, 2011

OPEC Crude Drops USD 2.19 to USD 107.94 pb

Read the full article →

Former U.K. Prime Minister On How To Escape Global Economic Downturn

October 20, 2011

The world’s major economies are increasingly vulnerable to falling into a global economic downturn unless they can swiftly coalesce to patch up a tattered European financial system and embrace policies aimed at generating vigorous growth, former British Prime Minister Gordon Brown warned during a meeting with HuffPost editors and reporters on Wednesday. Brown said that the world’s major economies need to agree to a global growth pact and international financial standards in order to escape from an avoidable but increasingly likely global economic downturn. “Global problems need global solutions,” Brown said. “If you can’t actually grow your economy, then the danger is that most of the action you take does not achieve the results that you intended it to achieve.” Europe is teetering on the edge of a financial crisis. If Greece defaults on its debt, then other troubled European countries would become more likely to default on their debt as interest rates rise, and European banks holding sovereign debt would be in danger of running out of cash and going bankrupt. As a result, U.S. banks could slash lending , and the American economy could shrink , according to some economists. While the euro zone has funneled loans to Greece to postpone a default, it has not taken action to restructure Greece’s debt, and its bailout fund amounts to only 440 billion euros — a fraction of the debt of the five European countries in danger of defaulting. A German finance ministry spokesman said on Wednesday that the size of the bailout fund will not be increased, according to Reuters. Brown, who was prime minister of Britain during the height of the financial crisis between 2007 and 2010, said that European political leaders need to take “radical action” to prevent a global economic downturn. In Brown’s view, world leaders never fully addressed the underlying fundamentals of the financial crisis and are now facing the same persistent problems — too many banks with too little cash on hand and a lack of knowledge about where money is flowing and how it puts the system at risk. Unless political leaders agree to international financial regulations, he said, major banks will continue to threaten to move elsewhere in a “race to the bottom.” Brown diagnosed the crisis in Europe primarily as a banking and economic growth crisis, dividing himself from northern European leaders who have characterized southern European countries as reckless spenders that now must face severe austerity measures. Greece’s economy has been shrinking since the announcement of austerity measures, and the country has become even less able to pay its debts as tax revenue drops. Conservative politicians in other European countries also have cut or refused to increase spending, and their economies are slowing in response. Even Germany, Europe’s largest economy, has seen its growth slow to a halt . Brown said that European banks are dramatically undercapitalized, putting them in danger of running out of cash and going bankrupt if investors demand their deposits at the same time. Brown’s solution is ensuring that the European Financial Stability Facility hold up to $3 trillion in order to bail out European banks if necessary. In addition to fixing its financial system, Brown said Europe also needs to grow its way out of its economic crisis. To ensure global economic growth, he said that world leaders need to agree on a mechanism that would allow emerging markets to consume more imports and developed economies to produce more exports so that both areas of the world can grow in sync. Brown’s comments come as the global recovery has hit a wall. The American economy grew at a rate of just 1.3 percent in the second quarter of this year, Europe’s economy has slowed to a crawl, and even China’s export-driven economy has slowed as demand for Chinese goods from other areas of the world has fallen. Brown also insisted that any international economic plan must include China. He proposed a mutually beneficial deal for the China and U.S. — China agreeing to increase its historically-low consumer spending and the U.S. agreeing to increase investment in order to ensure that its national economy will grow. Instead, American political leaders have increasingly blamed China for allegedly claiming American jobs in manufacturing and other areas, as well as keeping its currency artificially cheap compared to the dollar , allowing them to export more of their goods around the world. Brown warned that a repeat of protectionism from the Great Depression — in which countries retreated into their own “silos” and devised “self-defeating” solutions — would ensure a mutually assured economic downturn. He did not express much optimism as to whether European politicians would rise to the challenge of drafting a visionary global plan for economic growth. “Every time there’s a crisis, they take action that is too little and too late, and so the next time you have to deal with the next problem, it’s a bigger problem, and you have to take even more radical action,” Brown said. “You move from what was perhaps a manageable problem to a situation that has gone out of control because it hasn’t been dealt with adequately.”

Read the full article →

Kendrick Nguyen: Groupon: Deceptive Marketing in IPO Spotlight

October 19, 2011

Going public is a dream for most start-ups and their loyal employees and investors. But getting there can be a nightmare. Before the bell rings to usher in a company’s first day of trading at the exchange, it must endure a long and arduous initial public offering (“IPO”) process. Beyond procedural complexity, the IPO spotlight can publicize damaging and embarrassing problems. In the case of Groupon , negative revelations in recent months can be particularly damaging, due to intense public interest in the company and its inventive business model. Groupon’s legal problems are no secret. Until this week, the company’s most high-profile legal issues relate to the scrutiny of its accounting metrics by the SEC and the press. Among other legal problems are pending lawsuits alleging infringement of intellectual property rights and violation of laws governing the use of gift cards. Compliance with privacy law raises another concern. The regulatory regime governing the way online companies handle private information constantly evolves, and methods used by companies to monitor online users are coming under increased scrutiny. On the heel of these negative disclosures, a recent report from Thumbtack.com raises a new and uncertain legal issue for the daily deal giant, perhaps at the most inopportune of times. According to Thumbtack’s study , Groupon and its competitor, Living Social, at times use inflated regular prices to make their deals appear more attractive to buyers. For example, Groupon advertised a deal for home cleaning services in Phoenix for $49, as a 67 percent discount from the regular price of $150. Thumbtack reportedly called the merchant and got a regular price quote of only $80 for the same service as promoted in the deal. The price of $49 offered through Groupon should therefore represent a discount of 39 percent from the regular price, not 67 percent as Groupon advertised. Thumbtack also says that they called five different Groupon businesses asking for their regular rates — and in each case, the business quoted Thumbtack a price that was less than the regular price advertised by Groupon. Having recently purchased a carwash deal through Groupon at a 50 percent discount, I contacted the vendor after reading Thumbtack’s report. The regular price quoted by the vendor over the phone and on his website is identical to that listed by Groupon. At least for me, the deal remains as sweet as offered. It is possible that the reported discount inflations are isolated cases, limited only to a few deals in the local service industry where merchants infrequently publish regular rates on their website or otherwise. However, if true, they could raise an issue under consumer protection laws regarding deceptive advertising. For example, the Federal Trade Commission governs federal issues involving “unfair and deceptive acts or practices in commerce,” and it may seem unfair or deceptive to raise the “normal” price of a service in order to advertise an artificially inflated discount. In addition, allegations of inflated discounts go to the heart of Groupon’s business model and may cause some of its customers to pause before purchasing a deal. Most unfortunate is the timing of Thumbtack’s report. Groupon is in the middle of the so-called “quiet period” of the IPO process, during which communications with the public are severely restricted. The quiet period allows the market to reach a valuation of the company without influence from insiders who have motive to hype the company’s stock. It also prevents Groupon from publicly responding to criticism in a meaningful manner. None of Groupon’s current legal problems seems to threaten the company’s near-term success. And the new disclosures about potentially deceptive advertising are likely only limited to certain industries. The local service and travel industries, for example, are more susceptible to deceptive advertising in part because merchants in these industries infrequently publish regular rates. Groupon is rightfully lauded for forging a new marketing model that drives substantial new business to local merchants. Groupon faces many of these legal issues because it has invented a new business model premised on extremely deep, time-sensitive discounts. Any company that creates something new will have parts of its business model challenged in courts. However, taken together, these legal threats could significantly erode Groupon’s profits over time and force Groupon to gradually shift away from its reliance on the “daily deal” model for which it is so famous.

Read the full article →

Don McNay: How My Business Grew Via Word of Mouth Marketing

October 19, 2011

Building a Business by Word of Mouth Many businesses can prosper by word of mouth advertising. Kentucky Guardianship Administrators (a group I founded and own) is one that did. In 1990, The Louisville Courier-Journal did a series of articles about guardianship theft. Parents of children receiving money from an injury settlement or inheritance were usually selected to handle their child’s funds, even if they had no background in handling money themselves. The Courier-Journal reported several horror stories where parents took their own children’s money. The parents blew it on drugs, limo rides and other things that did not benefit their child. Even more children’s money was lost by parents with no financial experience making poor investment choices. The Guardianship Reform Act of 1990 enabled District Courts to appoint outside parties as conservators for children’s money. It permitted judges to direct money into a blocked bank account, trust or annuity. We set up Kentucky Guardianship Administrators LLC to serve as conservators and assist in setting up special needs trusts. I spoke to a number of legal groups and got them interested in how the concept would help their clients. With Judge Stanley Billingsley, I co-authored several articles in legal publications to help people understand all the things a conservator can do. A conservator is often called on to testify at trial. The job is to let the jury know that an award will be protected and spent on the injured child rather than by others trying to get their hands on it. According to the Kentucky Trial Court Review, few verdicts in injury cases are for over a million dollars. However, several of my early cases as conservator resulted in million or multimillion dollar verdicts or high profile settlements. The high profile nature of the verdicts, and our involvement, helped to advance the business. Even in the days before social media, the word still got around. In 1998, Kentucky Guardianship Administrators added a new service administrating qualified settlement funds. If you want to learn more about the nuances of qualified settlement funds, read “Is a Qualified Settlement Fund Right For Your Client,” an article in Trial Magazine that I co-authored with attorney William Garmer. Qualified settlement funds are normally used to administer funds for large mass torts. Most of our business has been done using smaller qualified settlement funds with just a few claims or claimants. Adding a new service allows our “word of mouth” marketing to build. Another important factor helpful to growing a business by word of mouth is having a semi-monopoly. Kentucky Guardianship Administrators was the only business of its kind when it was formed. In the past few years, a number of people have tried to become conservators and administer qualified settlement funds. That opened up a whole new line of business: cleaning up the messes that others have made. Several times, we have been called in after an inexperienced financial person was unable to get a qualified settlement fund approved or a guardianship set up. Since a prominent Kentucky Supreme Court decision in 2010, Branham v. Stewart, trial attorneys live in fear of messing up a guardianship and being sued for legal malpractice. Branham v. Stewart was considered one of the ten most important Kentucky Supreme Court decisions of 2010. In that case, the court allowed a legal malpractice case to proceed against a good attorney for errors he allegedly made regarding the guardianship process. That case spurred a lot of interest in finding experienced conservators and making sure guardianships were set up correctly. By creating a unique niche, developing expertise in that niche and having a useful service, our business grew without spending marketing or advertising dollars. Some call word of mouth advertising “bootstrap marketing,” Our decision to go that route was common sense. The concept of guardianship, conservators and qualified settlement funds are hard to explain in an “elevator pitch.” Attorneys started telling other attorneys about the group. It was the path to growth. Growing by word of mouth is a path that any business can emulate. Don McNay, CLU, ChFC, MSFS, CSSC is the bestselling author of the book Wealth Without Wall Street: McNay, who lives in Richmond Kentucky, an award-winning financial columnist and Huffington Post Contributor. You can learn more about him at www.donmcnay.com He is the Chairman of the Board for the McNay Settlement Group (www.mcnay.com) which provides structured settlement consulting for injury victims, lottery winners, and the families of special needs children. McNay founded Kentucky Guardianship Administrators LLC, which assists attorneys in as conservators and setting up guardianship’s. It is nationally recognized as an administrator of Qualified Settlement (468b) funds.

Read the full article →

Groupon Reportedly Cutting Back Size Of IPO

October 19, 2011

(Reuters) – Daily deals site Groupon is set to raise less than the amount it initially filed for in its IPO paperwork, two sources familiar with the situation said on Wednesday. Groupon in June filed to raise up to $750 million in its IPO. One source familiar with the situation said it is now planning to raise less than that amount, but not significantly less. A second source familiar with the situation said it is now planning to raise about $500 million. The information is not public and the sources declined to be named. Groupon was not immediately available for comment. Groupon is expected to launch its IPO roadshow early next week, sources told Reuters on Tuesday. The IPO is expected to value the Chicago-based company at over $10 billion, likely in the range of $11 billion to $12 billion, the sources said. Copyright 2011 Thomson Reuters. Click for Restrictions .

Read the full article →

Kristie Arslan: Payroll Tax Cut Extension Will Support Small Business Growth

October 19, 2011

I think we can all agree that the tax code could be more fair for Americans who want to start their own small business. It’s one of the pillars of the national self-employment initiative that I have been urging policymakers to adopt. One of the key components of President Obama’s American Jobs Act is a further extension of last year’s payroll tax cut for employees. In 2011, the employee FICA contribution stands at 4.2 percent, a cut of 2 percent. The President’s proposal would cut the employee contribution even further to just 3.1 percent. Employers would also see their contribution halved to 3.1 percent. For the nation’s over 22 million self-employed business owners, extending the payroll tax cut to employers is a big deal because they pay both the employee and employer portions of the FICA contribution. By extending the payroll tax cut to employers, the self-employed will see their overall tax liability decrease in the short-term, which will help these businesses generate growth for the long-term. This tax relief will extend to the four different types of business structures that the self-employed have to choose from: sole proprietorship, partnership, corporation and Limited Liability Company. Each business structure pays the same amount in FICA taxes and each has certain advantages and disadvantages that a new entrepreneur must take into consideration. Tax advisor and legal counsel are just two of the hats that self-employed business owners must wear when starting out. The tax relief included in the American Jobs Act may help some of the current unemployed and underemployed seek out self-employment as a job option. It will also help millions of current businesses generate economic activity and help our economy return to prosperity. There are resources available for those interested in starting a new small business navigate the current regulatory landscape to ensure they succeed. You are not alone — and do not have to go it alone!

Read the full article →

Robert Teitelman: Joe Nocera Reads Since Yesterday

October 19, 2011

In his New York Times column Saturday, Joe Nocera discovers the Great Depression and, as the headline accurately declares, “The 1930s Sure Sounds Familiar.” Well, to Nocera at least. There’s the lousy economy, there’s the Occupy Wall Street movement (the bonus marchers’ Hooverville, says Nocera), there’s Bernie Madoff (Ivar Kreuger), there’s even Casey Anthony (the Lindbergh kidnapping). And, of course, there’s this lurch toward austerity. Nocera seems to get most of this social and cultural parallelism from paging through Frederick Lewis Allen’s popular history of the 30s, Since Yesterday , published in 1940. Anyone who went to school in my era — a long time ago (impossibly long from the perspective of Zuccotti Park) — had to read some Allen, mostly his most famous book, Only Yesterday , about the 20s, in your basic introductory U.S. history class. Allen was a Harper’s editor and one of the earliest “popular” historians, of which we now have an entire industry. He was writing what was later to be called “consensus American history,” rationalizing the disasters and divisions and emphasizing the triumph of an American spirit that transcended class and race — a school that has long been submerged in academia but remains a popular trope. He was also writing while depression still retained its grip, and he was, to say the least, not exactly an expert economic historian. Nocera unerringly reaches for the kind of consensus sentiment that made Allen so popular, if increasingly ignored in academia, “Despite the miseries of the Depression and the recurrent fears of new economic decline and of war, the bulk of the American people had not yet quite lost their basic asset of hopefulness…a nation tried in a long ordeal had not yet lost heart.” One might ask of Allen in 1940: how did he know? Did he ask anyone outside his relatively narrow social set? Or was it just a feeling he had? Allen was, and remains, extremely readable. But in going back to Allen, charming as he could be, Nocera blithely seems to dismiss generations of hard historical labor on Great Depression issues that remain knotty and difficult. Some of these are basic: what were the true causes of the slump? (Ben Bernanke at Princeton did a lot of work in this area .) What role did the Keynesian revolution have on the New Deal? (A lot, but later.) How did we finally slay the beast? (World War II, but how, and why, did it not return?) Scholars have looked at the hard politics of the New Deal and Rooseveltian liberalism; at the fissures and splits within the country and within the New Deal. And they’ve had far more history to explore. Some tremendous work has been done. What happened to the New Deal, and how did that evolution — long after Allen wrote Since Yesterday — alter our view of the 30s? This is particularly the case with a subject Allen has very little understanding of: macroeconomics. (Nocera, in an aside, says that Allen “implicitly” agrees with the notion that FDR — our Obama — should have done more, not less, in terms of government spending. What’s the “implicitly”? Could it be that Allen was really clueless on these matters and would rather write about Hoovervilles and kidnappings?) So why is Nocera turning to Allen? Well, as he writes, it’s “a reminder of why history matters.” The 30s, in short, reminds him of now. But again Nocera gets himself mired in Allen’s soft and taffy-like sociology. Ivar Kreugar might seem like Bernie Madoff, but Kreugar brought down a whole global economic infrastructure, including banks, while Madoff hurt some wealthy investors (and the Ponzi scheme charge, as even Nocera seems to understand, is complicated with Kreugar). It’s a little insulting to the desperate bonus baby veterans in the 30s to compare them with the Occupy Wall Street crowd who have settled in Zuccotti voluntarily and seem to be well provisioned, with lots of social media at hand; the bonus marchers had a very specific set of demands, as well, which certainly isn’t a characteristic of OWS. Nocera also seems surprised that big business did reasonably well in the Great Depression. Well, all things are relative; they did better than smaller businesses that really suffered. But the economy in the 20s had been highly concentrated, far more than today; and that concentration only deepened with the slump and continued into the 50s. Compared to then, today’s economy, for all its problems, is much more dynamic, fluid and balanced between large and small. This was an industrial economy, with enormous economies of scale. Size begat size. Corporate credit was scarce; consumer credit was hard to find and difficult to access; and there was no venture capital, private equity or debt financing with any leverage (although Kreugar’s empire collapsed under vast leverage). Large corporations controlled patents and dominated R&D; there was nothing remotely comparable to Silicon Valley. Entrepreneurs were deeply suspect. In short, the 30s were radically different from 2011 in a hundred different ways. Yes, both periods were shaken up by economic dislocation. It’s not to diminish current woes to say that 9% unemployment is a lot different than 25%, or that a world struggling to cope with a rising China and a splintering Europe is a lot different than one dominated by rising fascism, Nazism and communism. And a world (still) with Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid, not to say bank deposit insurance, is a far cry from one that lacked any safety net to speak of and that was prone to destructive bank runs driven by fear and anxiety. This is the second piece in a week or so in which a Times columnist has tried to ransack the Great Depression for current purposes; David Leonhardt did it last weekend, which I commented on . In both cases, there’s an attempt to create a false equivalence between these two economic dislocations. Yes, it is important to know what’s occurred historically; and it’s vital to see the commonalities. But looking carefully only makes it more difficult to draw easy and simple comparisons. The more you know, the more you realize how foreign is the past, how many differences there are and how uncertain and complex remains the present. And when you turn to a popular book from 1940 to make your case, you’re in trouble.

Read the full article →

Former Mrs. Nevada Used Online Scam to Steal From Thousands Of Americans

October 19, 2011

When Juliette Kimoto took to the stage to accept her crown as Mrs. Nevada in 2006, she seemed an obvious fit for the coveted pageant title. Blond and svelte, the native Nevadan had been married to her high school sweetheart for 12 years. She was a mother of six, an active member of her church, and volunteered to provide “mother-to-mother support to pregnant teens and at-risk pregnant women.” What she declined to mention, however, was that she was also engaged in an online operation that would eventually rob tens of thousands of people of $30 million.

Read the full article →

Your Neighborhood Could Affect Your Health

October 19, 2011

ATLANTA — Back in the 1990s, the federal government tried an unusual social experiment: It offered thousands of poor women in big-city public housing a chance to live in more affluent neighborhoods. A decade later, the women who relocated had lower rates of diabetes and extreme obesity – differences that are being hailed as compelling evidence that where you live can determine your health. The experiment was initially aimed at researching whether moving impoverished families to more prosperous areas could improve employment or schooling. But according to a study released Wednesday, the most interesting effect may have been on the women’s physical condition. About 16 percent of the women who moved had diabetes, compared with about 20 percent of women who stayed in public housing. And about 14 percent of those who left the projects were extremely obese, compared with nearly 18 percent of the other women. The small-but-significant differences offered some of the strongest support yet for the idea that where you live can significantly affect your overall health, especially if your home is in a low-income area with few safe places to exercise, limited food options and meager medical services. “This study proves that concentrated poverty is not only bad policy, it’s bad for your health,” Shaun Donovan, secretary of the Department of Housing and Urban Development. But no one believes the deficit-plagued federal government is going to expand the program and start moving low-income women to better neighborhoods en masse. “It’s not enough to simply move families into different neighborhoods,” Donovan said. Instead, new ways must be found to help families “break the cycle of poverty that can quite literally make them sick.” He did not mention specific proposals. Public health experts have long thought that living in poor neighborhoods could ruin a person’s health, but this study put the idea to a rigorous test. Here’s how it worked: Women believed to be about the same in most respects were randomly assigned to one group or another and then followed through time, in a model customarily seen in pharmaceutical studies. That makes it more scientifically rigorous than most research linking health problems to a social environment. The study’s good design “provides a basis to infer cause and effect” between poverty and bad health, said Dr. Robert Califf, a noted Duke University cardiologist who is leading a massive study on neighborhoods and health outcomes. The research was led by Jens Ludwig, a University of Chicago professor of public policy. It was published in Wednesday’s New England Journal of Medicine. The experiment started as a $70 million HUD project in Baltimore, Boston, Chicago, Los Angeles and New York. It morphed into a health study after a variety of other government agencies and private foundations pitched in with an additional $17 million more. “In terms of scale, it’s not soon or ever to be repeated,” said Dr. Robert Whitaker, a Temple University pediatrician who was a study co-author. The study involved women living in public housing in neighborhoods where 40 percent or more of residents were poor – areas like many of those on the South Side of Chicago or in the Bronx in New York City. The women all had children and were considered heads of households. From 1994 to 1998, nearly 1,800 of them were offered vouchers to subsidize private housing, but the vouchers were only good in higher-income neighborhoods where fewer than 10 percent of the people were considered poor. They were required to live there at least a year. The rest of the women were divided into two groups. One group got vouchers they could use in any neighborhood. The other women did not receive vouchers, with the expectation that they would stay put. Ten years later, women in the study were weighed and gave a blood sample to check for diabetes. The women who moved to richer areas had the lowest rates of extreme obesity and diabetes. The difference suggests that moving to a better neighborhood could help at least 1 in 25 women. Or, in other terms, a person’s risk of diabetes or extreme obesity dropped by about 20 percent by moving to a higher-income neighborhood. (However, even the women who moved were not exactly models of health. About 14 percent of them were extremely obese, which is twice the national average for women.) The study has some notable flaws. Because it did not start out looking at health, the women’s medical condition and weight were not checked at the outset. The researchers believe the women in the different groups were about the same, because they matched up on more than 50 other indicators, such as age, race, employment and education. But that is an assumption. Also, only about half the women offered a chance to move to a more prosperous zip code did so. And many who did move left after a year. What’s more, the study was not designed to answer what it is about more affluent neighborhoods that would cause someone to be healthier. But the authors listed four theories: _ The availability of healthier food is worse in lower-income neighborhoods. _ Opportunities for physical exercise are scarcer, and fear of crime can make people afraid to jog or play in parks. _ There may be fewer doctors’ offices and other medical services. _ The long-term stress of living in such an environment may alter the hormones that control weight. Some of those theories were supported by some women who live in the kind of situation targeted in the study. Vickie Webb lived in the projects in Durham, N.C., for several years before a housing agency helped relocate her and her husband to a better neighborhood. “There was too much violence, too much going on in the `hood. It wasn’t safe,” said Webb, who was not part of the study. Annie Ricks, who lives with her 14-year-old son and two grandchildren in a public housing unit on Chicago’s South Side, was not involved in the study either. But she said efforts like the HUD experiment should be expanded. Local housing authorities paid for her to relocate to the South Side last year as part of its demolition plans for high-rise tenements. But Ricks lost her child-care job after the move, and says her new neighborhood is worse. At her old building, Ricks could walk across the street to a supermarket. In her new neighborhood, without a car, she has to take public transportation to get groceries or go to the doctor, and Ricks says there’s more crime. “I feel like it would be a blessing” to be able to move to a wealthier area, she said. ___ Associated Press writers Alicia Chang in Los Angeles and Lindsey Tanner in Chicago contributed to this report.

Read the full article →

Mohamed A. El-Erian: America at Stall Speed?

October 19, 2011

Judging from the skittishness of both markets and “consensus expectations,” the United States’ economic prospects are confusing. One day, the country is on the brink of a double-dip recession; the next, it is on the verge of a turbo-charged recovery, powered by resilient consumers and US multinationals starting to deploy, at long last, their massive cash reserves. In the process, markets take investors on a wild rollercoaster ride, with the European crisis (riddled with even more confusion and volatility) serving to aggravate their queasiness. This situation is both understandable and increasingly unsettling for America’s well-being and that of the global economy. It reflects the impact of fundamental (and historic) economic and financial re-alignments, insufficient policy responses, and system-wide rigidities that frustrate structural change. As a result, there are now legitimate questions about the underlying functioning of the US economy and, therefore, its evolution in the months and years ahead. One way to understand current conditions — and what is needed to improve them — is to consider two events that recently attracted considerable worldwide attention: the launch of Boeing’s Dreamliner passenger jet and the tragic death of Apple’s Steve Jobs. Let us start with some simple aeronautic dynamics, using an analogy that my PIMCO colleague, Bill Gross, came up with to describe the economic risks facing the American economy. For the Dreamliner to take off, ascend, and maintain a steady altitude, it must do more than move forward. It has to move forward fast enough to exceed critical physical thresholds, which are significantly higher than those for most of Boeing’s other (smaller) planes. Failure would mean succumbing to a mid-air stall, with tepid forward motion giving way to a sudden loss of altitude. Unless we are convinced of the Dreamliner’s ability to avoid stall speed, it makes no sense to talk about all the ways in which it will enhance the travel experience for millions of people around the world. America’s economy today risks stall speed. Specifically, the question is not whether it can grow, but whether it can grow fast enough to propel a large economy that, according to the US Federal Reserve, faces “balance-sheet deleveraging, credit constraints, and household and business uncertainty about the economic outlook.” And, remember, it is just over a year since certain US officials were proclaiming the economy’s “summer of recovery” — a view underpinned by the erroneous belief that America was reaching “escape velocity.” Stall speed is a terrifying risk for an economy like that of the US, which desperately needs to grow robustly. Without rapid growth, there is no way to reverse persistently high and increasingly structural (and therefore protracted) unemployment; safely de-leverage over-indebted balance sheets; and prevent already-disturbing income and wealth inequalities from growing worse. The private sector alone cannot and will not counter the risk of stall speed. What is desperately needed is better policymaking. Specifically, policymakers must be open and willing to understand the unusual challenges facing the US economy, react accordingly, and possess sufficiently potent policy instruments. Unfortunately, this has been far from the case in America (and in Europe, where the situation is worse). Moreover, US policymakers in the last few weeks have been more interested in pointing fingers at Europe and China than in recognizing and responding to the paradigm shifts that are at the root of the country’s economic problems and mounting social challenges. This is where the insights of Steve Jobs, one of the world’s best innovators and entrepreneurs, come in. Jobs did more than navigate paradigm shifts; he essentially created them. He was a master at converting the complicated into the simple; and, rather than being paralyzed by complexity, he found new ways to deconstruct and overcome it. Teamwork was an obligation, not a choice. And he eschewed the search for the single “big bang” in favor of aiming for multiple breakthroughs. Underlying it all was a willingness to evolve — a drive for perfection through experimentation. Moreover, he excelled at selling to audiences worldwide both his vision and his strategy for realizing it. So far, America’s economic policymakers have fallen short on all of these fronts. Rather than committing to a comprehensive set of urgently-needed reinforcing measures, they seem obsessed with the futile search for the one “killer app” that will solve all of the country’s economic problems. No surprise that they have yet to find it. Teamwork has repeatedly fallen hostage to turf wars and political bickering. Little has been done to deconstruct structural complexity, let alone win sufficient public support for a medium-term vision, a credible implementation strategy, and a set of measures that is adequate to the task at hand. The longer the policymaking impasse persists, the greater the stall-speed risk for an economy that already has an unemployment crisis, a large budget deficit, many underwater mortgages, and policy interest rates floored at zero. This is an atmosphere in which unhealthy balance sheets come under even greater pressure, and healthy investors refuse to engage. In the process, the risk of recession remains uncomfortably high, the unemployment crisis deepens, and inequities rise as already-stretched social safety nets prove even more porous. Mohamed A. El-Erian is CEO and co-CIO of PIMCO, and author of When Markets Collide. This post originally appeared at Project Syndicate and is reprinted here with the author’s permission. Copyright: Project Syndicate, 2011. www.project-syndicate.org

Read the full article →

Housing Starts Jump, But Overall Data a Mixed Bag

October 19, 2011

Overall housing starts in September beat expectations by a wide margin, the U.S. Commerce Department reported Wednesday, the surge coming primarily from multi-unit structures. Permits for new homes were down, however, which means the gains probably won’t last. With demand for single-family homes still stagnant, many Americans are turning to rental properties, which prompted the increase in multi-unit dwellings. Because of that, as well as the decrease in permit structures, housing experts are skeptical that the September data represent a meaningful shift in direction for the battered sector. “I’d love to see it as something concrete, but I just don’t see that happening,” said Steve Palm, president of Smart Numbers, an Atlanta-based real-estate data firm. The report showed that new housing construction jumped 15% to a seasonally-adjusted annual rate of 658,000 units, the biggest increase in 17 months. Analysts had predicted an increase of 590,000 new units. The lion’s share of the September increase — 51.3% — came from construction of buildings with two or more units.  Meanwhile, construction starts of single-family homes — by far the larger segment of the market — rose just 1.7%, according to the data. Palm described starts on multi-family dwellings as a “moving target” because the data is compiled differently around the country and is often skewed or misleading. Data on single-family homes is more uniform and therefore more telling as an indicator of the health of the housing market. “It’s an anomaly,” he said. Adding to the muted reaction from housing analysts is that permits for new construction, which are viewed as more meaningful than actual groundbreakings, fell 5% to a 594,000 annual rate. It was the lowest reading in five months as an inventory glut of existing homes caused by a rise in foreclosures over the summer appears to have curbed developers’ plans for building new homes. IHS Global Insight economist Patrick Newport explained that permits are more relevant than starts because “they are much better measured, less affected by unusual weather, such as hurricanes, and are forward looking.” “Added up, total permits were down — indicating that housing starts are likely to drop in October or November,” said Newport. “On balance, this was a mixed report.  The increase in starts is good for GDP growth and jobs.  The drop in permits indicates that September’s gains are not sustainable.  The report does not change the current direction of the housing market — a flat single-family market and a slowly improving multi-family market,” Newport concluded. Palm was more blunt. “We’re not going anywhere. We’re just plodding along. The economy definitely has to improve and housing isn’t going to lead us out of this,” he said.

Read the full article →

Bill Ready, Executive in Residence at Accel Partners and Former President of iPay Technologies, Joins Braintree as CEO

October 19, 2011

CHICAGO, IL–(Marketwire – Oct 19, 2011) – Braintree, an online payments provider that powers commerce for many of the fastest-growing and most discerning online businesses in the world, announced that payments industry leader Bill Ready has joined the company as CEO.

Read the full article →

AMD Appoints Mark Papermaster as Senior Vice President and Chief Technology Officer

October 19, 2011

Apple, Cisco and IBM Veteran Brings Extensive Processor and Platform Design Experience Spanning From Low-Power Handhelds to High-Performance Blade Servers

Read the full article →

BIOLASE Chief Financial Officer Frederick D. Furry to Add Chief Operating Officer Role

October 19, 2011

IRVINE, CA–(Marketwire – Oct 19, 2011) – BIOLASE Technology, Inc. ( NASDAQ : BLTI ), the World’s leading dental laser manufacturer and distributor, announced today that Chief Financial Officer Frederick D. Furry has been appointed to Chief Operating Officer, effective immediately. Furry will continue in his role as Chief Financial Officer and reports directly to Chief Executive Officer Federico Pignatelli.

Read the full article →

MicroSeismic Inc. Announces Executive Management Changes

October 19, 2011

HOUSTON, TX–(Marketwire – Oct 19, 2011) – The Board of Directors of MicroSeismic, Inc. (MicroSeismic) announced today that Peter Duncan, Founder, President and CEO, will become Executive Chairman of MicroSeismic’s Board of Directors and William (Bill) Coates will succeed him as President and CEO; both appointments are effective immediately.

Read the full article →

An Ambitious Product Roadmap Drives Mobile Messenger to Recruit New CTO

October 19, 2011

Leading Mobile Payments and Marketing Specialist Announces Todd Kokoszka as Chief Technology Officer

Read the full article →

Japan shares decline

October 19, 2011

Japan shares decline

Read the full article →

Brussels praises Portuguese austerity depite deepening recession

October 19, 2011

Brussels praises Portuguese austerity depite deepening recession

Read the full article →

G20 partners ”not keeping promises” on free trade, EU complains

October 19, 2011

G20 partners ”not keeping promises” on free trade, EU complains

Read the full article →

S. Korea, Japan expand credit-swap line accord

October 19, 2011

S. Korea, Japan expand credit-swap line accord

Read the full article →

Sovereign Gold Company Limited (ASX:SOC) Found Free Gold at Reedy Creek

October 19, 2011

Sovereign Gold Company Limited (ASX:SOC) Found Free Gold at Reedy Creek

Read the full article →

BoE votes unanimously to expand APF

October 19, 2011

BoE votes unanimously to expand APF

Read the full article →

Usd/Nok Bounce Lacking Follow Through But We Are Patient

October 19, 2011

Usd/Nok Bounce Lacking Follow Through But We Are Patient

Read the full article →

S. Africa’s inflation rise to 5.7% in September

October 19, 2011

S. Africa’s inflation rise to 5.7% in September

Read the full article →

Republican Presidential Candidates Misfire On Big Issues

October 19, 2011

WASHINGTON — Herman Cain’s 9-9-9 tax plan ignited plenty of sparks in the Republican presidential debate Tuesday night, as did testy exchanges between Mitt Romney and Rick Perry. In those instances and more, the facts took a bit of a beating. A look at the accuracy of some of the claims in the Las Vegas debate: HERMAN CAIN: “It does not raise taxes on those that are making the least.” THE FACTS: An independent analysis of his tax plan, released Tuesday, concluded otherwise. The Tax Policy Center, a Washington think tank, said Cain’s plan would increase taxes on 84 percent of U.S. households, hitting low- and medium-income households the hardest. The analysis said that households making $10,000 to $20,000 would see whopping tax increases averaging $2,705 – an increase of nearly 950 percent. The rich, however, would get big tax cuts, the analysis said. Cain’s plan would scrap current taxes on income, payroll, capital gains and corporate profits. He would replace them with a 9 percent tax on income, a 9 percent business tax and a 9 percent national sales tax. The study is in line with economic theorists – whether on the left or right – who note that sales taxes tend to hit low-income families the hardest because they spend more of their income than wealthier families do. Unlike most states, Cain’s plan would not exempt food or medicine from sales taxes. Used items, however, would be exempt. Cain said his plan would create zones where people and businesses could get additional tax deductions, which would reduce taxes for low-income people. The Tax Policy Center said it did not take the zones into account because the Cain campaign did not provide any details on how they would work. ___ RICK PERRY: “Mitt, you lose all of your standing, from my perspective, because you hired illegals in your home and you knew about it for a year. And the idea that you stand here before us and talk about that you’re strong on immigration is on its face the height of hypocrisy.” MITT ROMNEY: “I don’t think I’ve ever hired an illegal in my life.” THE FACTS: The truth is that Romney, former Massachusetts governor, never directly hired an illegal immigrant. But he hired a landscaping company that employed them. In bringing up the matter, Texas Gov. Perry resurrected a charge that has dogged Romney since his last presidential bid. In 2006, Romney learned that the landscaper of his suburban Boston home had employed illegal immigrants. He gave the company a second chance under the condition that it would no longer employ undocumented workers. But in 2007, during the height of his first Republican presidential campaign, the same company was caught employing illegal immigrants at Romney’s home. Romney then fired the landscaper. At the time, and again Tuesday night, Romney said there’s only so much an individual can do when hiring a legitimate company. ___ ROMNEY to PERRY: “You were the chairman of Al Gore’s campaign.” THE FACTS: Romney’s claim was misleading, at best. He neglected to mention that Perry’s role in Gore’s failed 1988 campaign for the Democratic nomination was limited to Texas. It was also marginal. Perry was a Democrat serving in the state legislature at the time and had no significant leadership role in Gore’s third-place finish in Texas. He was one of 28 Democratic Texas lawmakers who endorsed Gore. In any event, he was far from being “the chairman” of Gore’s campaign. Perry switched parties in 1989 and successfully ran for state agriculture commissioner as a Republican. ___ RICK SANTORUM: “(Perry) sent a letter the day of the vote on the floor of the House saying, pass the economic plan. There was only one plan, and that was the plan that was voted on the floor. It was TARP.” PERRY: “I’m just telling you I know what we sent, I know what the intention was. You can read it any way you want, but the fact of the matter, I wasn’t for TARP, and have talked about it for years since then.” THE FACTS: In October 2008, Perry appeared to be both for and against the Troubled Asset Relief Program in the same week. As chairman of the Republican Governors Association, he co-wrote a letter to Congress with his Democratic counterpart that is hard to interpret as anything other than a call to pass the bailout that became known as TARP. “We strongly urge Congress to leave partisanship at the door and pass an economic recovery package,” said the letter. It was dated Oct. 1, just after the House rejected an initial version of the economic recovery bill. That vote triggered an 800-point drop in the Dow Jones industrial average. But the next day, Perry was quoted in The Dallas Morning News as saying that he while favored some kind of economic recovery plan to help taxpayers, “In a free-market economy, government should not be in the business of using taxpayer dollars to bail out corporate America.” Within days, a new version of the bailout was passed by the Senate, then the House, and signed into law by Republican President George W. Bush. ___ MICHELE BACHMANN: “Even the Obama administration chose to reject part of Obamacare. … Now the administration is arguing with itself.” THE FACTS: True, the administration is moving to scrap a long-term insurance program that was part of Obama’s health care law. But it would be wrong to take that as a sign the administration is losing faith in the overhaul. Quite the contrary. Unlike the central provisions of the health care law, the long-term insurance plan, called CLASS, was voluntary. From an accounting viewpoint, that was its fatal weakness. Without some reason for large numbers of healthy people to sign up, experts warned all along that CLASS would attract too many people in frail health. Rising benefit costs would send premiums spiraling upward. Healthier people would drop out, and eventually taxpayers would have to bail CLASS out. Obama’s health insurance mandate, requiring nearly everyone to have insurance, protects his overhaul from a similar fate. “You have to have a broad risk pool,” said Robert Bixby, executive director of the Concord Coalition, a nonpartisan group that advocates cutting the federal deficit. “By mandating coverage, (the health care law) creates a broad risk pool and that makes the system much more sustainable.” ___ ROMNEY to PERRY: “You probably also ought to tell people that if you look over the last several years, 40 percent, almost half the jobs created in Texas were created for illegal aliens, illegal immigrants.” THE FACTS: There’s some basis for the assertion that significant numbers of jobs were taken by immigrants, but it’s a stretch to try to pinpoint how many of them may have been in the country illegally. A September report from the conservative-leaning Center for Immigration Studies concluded that 81 percent of new Texas jobs were taken by newly arrived immigrants, basing that on a government survey used to calculate the unemployment rate. The group also estimated that about half of those jobs were taken by illegal immigrants. The government survey that is the source of the numbers asks people whether they are foreign or native born, but doesn’t ask about their legal status. The center’s estimate was an extrapolation based on other government estimates of illegal immigrant populations. ___ BACHMANN: “The biggest problem with this administration and foreign policy is that President Obama is the first president since Israel declared her sovereignty (to) put daylight between the United States and Israel.” THE FACTS: Israel and the U.S. have had their disagreements and have showed them – often in far starker contrast than today. And the consequences have been far greater, too. While the Obama administration has criticized Israeli settlement construction on disputed lands, President George H.W. Bush actually punished the Jewish state for the policy by docking housing loan guarantees. President Jimmy Carter experienced tensions with the Israeli government over his public support for a Palestinian homeland, and President Ronald Reagan harshly criticized Israel for a military attack on an Iraqi nuclear plant in the 1980s. Even in times of war, the U.S. and Israel have differed publicly. The worst disagreement came in 1956 when the United States demanded that Israel, Britain and France end their joint war against Egypt. ___ Associated Press writers Ricardo Alonso-Zaldivar, Stephen Ohlemacher, Jim Drinkard, Bradley Klapper and Steve Peoples, Tom Raum, Alicia Caldwell and Chris Rugaber in Washington; and Chris Tomlinson in Austin, Texas; contributed to this report.

Read the full article →

S Korea Sep corporate default drops notably

October 19, 2011

S Korea Sep corporate default drops notably

Read the full article →

Greek PM contrasting strikers with new austerity mesures

October 19, 2011

Greek PM contrasting strikers with new austerity mesures

Read the full article →

China Jan-Sep FDI up 16.6% to USD86.68b

October 19, 2011

China Jan-Sep FDI up 16.6% to USD86.68b

Read the full article →

US financial crisis to have deep-ongoing impact on economy

October 19, 2011

US financial crisis to have deep-ongoing impact on economy

Read the full article →

S1P1 aonists are currently indicated for treatment of multiple Sclerosis

October 19, 2011

S1P1 aonists are currently indicated for treatment of multiple Sclerosis

Read the full article →

BIOTRONIK launches first 20 mm-200 mm stents on 4 F platform

October 19, 2011

BIOTRONIK launches first 20 mm-200 mm stents on 4 F platform

Read the full article →

Apple registers USD6.6b profits in Q4

October 19, 2011

Apple registers USD6.6b profits in Q4

Read the full article →

UK’s BSkyB registers 16% rise in Q1 Ops profits

October 19, 2011

UK’s BSkyB registers 16% rise in Q1 Ops profits

Read the full article →

Germany Sep car sales up 8.1%

October 19, 2011

Germany Sep car sales up 8.1%

Read the full article →