October 2011

OSE, NASDAQ OMX Corporate Solutions, Inc. introduce CI to listed companies

October 18, 2011

OSE, NASDAQ OMX Corporate Solutions, Inc. introduce CI to listed companies

Read the full article →

Conference UN Convention against corruption

October 18, 2011

Conference UN Convention against corruption

Read the full article →

Governments must join forces to boost global growth: IMF

October 18, 2011

Governments must join forces to boost global growth: IMF

Read the full article →

Apple’s iPhone 4S sales exceed 4m

October 18, 2011

Apple’s iPhone 4S sales exceed 4m

Read the full article →

UK’s inflation rises to 5.2% in September

October 18, 2011

UK’s inflation rises to 5.2% in September

Read the full article →

Steinhoff sells S. Africa assets for USD1.1b

October 18, 2011

Steinhoff sells S. Africa assets for USD1.1b

Read the full article →

Siemens to establish R&D plant in China

October 18, 2011

Siemens to establish R&D plant in China

Read the full article →

Coca-Cola’s Q3 profits rise to USD2.22b

October 18, 2011

Coca-Cola’s Q3 profits rise to USD2.22b

Read the full article →

Canada, EU in talks to sign trade agreement

October 18, 2011

Canada, EU in talks to sign trade agreement

Read the full article →

Officials, Banks Working on New Mortgage Refinancing Plan

October 18, 2011

Officials and big banks are working on a plan that would make refinancing available to some borrowers whose houses are worth less than their loans, so long as they are current on mortgage payments, the Wall Street Journal reported. Such borrowers typically are not able to refinance because they lack equity in their homes. The plan would apply only to mortgages owned by the banks, the Journal said, citing people familiar with the matter. Federal officials have been trying to broker a settlement with the five largest mortgage servicers — Ally Financial Ally Financial Inc ALLY’B, Bank of America, Citigroup, J.P. Morgan Chase and Wells Fargo — the Journal said. It is not clear how many borrowers would qualify for help, the paper added. Officials are pushing for a plan in a bid to break a legal impasse with big banks over alleged foreclosure abuses and ease problems in the housing market, the paper said. Discussions are still fluid and any final outcome is uncertain. Talks between government officials and the banks are expected to continue this week, the newspaper said. JPMorgan declined to comment to Reuters on the Journal report. Reuters could not immediately reach the other four lenders for comment outside regular U.S. business hours.

Read the full article →

Blackham Resources Limited (ASX:BLK) Matilda Gold Mine Acquisition – Amended

October 18, 2011

Blackham Resources Limited (ASX:BLK) Matilda Gold Mine Acquisition – Amended

Read the full article →

China’s economy slows to 9.1% in last quarter

October 18, 2011

China’s economy slows to 9.1% in last quarter

Read the full article →

Japan shares rise 1.5% on stable Yen, overseas gains

October 18, 2011

Japan shares rise 1.5% on stable Yen, overseas gains

Read the full article →

Frankfurt stock exchange quotations

October 18, 2011

Frankfurt stock exchange quotations

Read the full article →

Europe shares extend early gains, led by cyclicals

October 18, 2011

Europe shares extend early gains, led by cyclicals

Read the full article →

Futures signal strong open for European equities

October 18, 2011

Futures signal strong open for European equities

Read the full article →

Japan’s prime minister says free trade deals needed for growth

October 18, 2011

Japan’s prime minister says free trade deals needed for growth

Read the full article →

UN and economy on agenda for India talks with Brazil, South Africa

October 18, 2011

UN and economy on agenda for India talks with Brazil, South Africa

Read the full article →

Stanley Black & Decker’s Q3 net income surges 26%

October 18, 2011

Stanley Black & Decker’s Q3 net income surges 26%

Read the full article →

Oil Near $87 in Asia

October 18, 2011

Oil Near $87 in Asia

Read the full article →

China Become EU’s Largest Trading Partner

October 18, 2011

China Become EU’s Largest Trading Partner

Read the full article →

Singapore Exports Decline 4.5% in September

October 18, 2011

Singapore Exports Decline 4.5% in September

Read the full article →

EU Faces 20 Years of Rising Energy Bills

October 18, 2011

EU Faces 20 Years of Rising Energy Bills

Read the full article →

Monika Mitchell: Is Wall Street the Enemy of the People?

October 18, 2011

Lately, there has been a fast-growing movement to declare “Wall Street” the enemy of the people. We arrived at this critical point of public rage very simply because the 20th century model of “take the money and run” went off a cliff three years ago resulting in serious unintended consequences and general public outrage and misery. In the high tech super-transparent 21st century there simply is no place to run. Even if you do run, you definitely can’t hide. The current “rage against the machine” conversation does not separate the good Wall Street from the bad. At the risk of mountains of hate (or love) mail, I must explain there is a “good” Wall Street: one that runs on integrity, honor and old-fashioned ideals like “my word is my bond.” The trouble is that in the decades since iconic “hero-villain,” celluloid Gordon Gekko and the 80s mantra of “Greed is Good” rose to fame, the “bad” Wall Street has outweighed the good. Sort of like a Star Wars movie, where good and evil duke it out. Where is Hans Solo when you need him? One thing we learned from the Oliver Stone movie is to never put an actor as hot as a young Michael Douglas in a pivotal role if you want the public to hate him. Let’s face it, the man looked good in suspenders. Basically most men wanted to be like him and most women wanted to be with him. His appearance in the film, “Wall Street” made greed glamorous, even gave it sex appeal. We are still fighting that ethos as a culture. For the purposes of this article let’s start with what’s bad about Wall Street – the issues that the general public are outraged about and that the Occupy Wall Street movement are echoing. Firstly, in the wake of nearly six million homes being foreclosed upon, 25 million children homeless, 42 million Americans on food stamps, and twenty million people unemployed since the banking collapse: there is nothing glamorous about “ripping people’s faces off “- especially since some of the victims were young children tossed out on the street with their teddy bears by errant lenders who gave out mortgage loans like lollipops at a 1970s dentist. Greed is the new “bad.” In fact, greed is about as unsexy as it gets in our 21st century world. It’s savage, primitive and brutal. It creates devastating poverty, hunger, homelessness and a society that most of us on the side of good abhor. Sure there are holdouts. They shall remain nameless; but many in the financial industry know who they are. The fact is there is “good and bad” everywhere. There are plenty of good folks in your hometown and also plenty of people that would just as soon cut you off on the road, pad your car repair bill, lock you into a toxic mortgage loan and shake you down at every chance. This is just a part of life and as ancient as human civilization. The good news is as we evolve as a culture, we become more cognizant of how our behavior affects others and the consequences of our actions. A senior manager at one of the big investment banks claimed, “It’s not my job to take care of other people. My job is to take care of my family and myself. If somebody else didn’t take care of their finances and finds themselves in an underwater mortgage or out of work… it’s on them . It’s not my problem.” Well, ok. Fair enough. Gordon would be proud. But darlin’, that is so 20th century. The fact is the growing outrage against that kind of indifference makes it your problem, whether you want it to be or not. The Times are changin’ There is something new going on in this millennium, something really exciting. A shift in the way we think from an exclusive sense of “what’s in it for me?” to an inclusive sense of “what kind of world are we co-creating?” In the mortgage market mayhem of 2002-2007, all hell broke loose in the world of financial reason. “Risk,” that fine balancing act between smart investment and outright disaster, became the decade’s hot potato. Everyone passed the risk onto the next guy, hoping that when the music stopped, they would not be holding it. Alan Greenspan, the Federal Reserve Chairman who in his tenure was viewed as a financial genius, supported the “transfer of risk” to counterparties around the globe. His misguided belief was that “dispersing risk” would minimize the damage created by bad bets. None other than Wall Street sage Warren Buffet tried to dissuade him from that view – famously calling some of the most dangerous investment vehicles like Collateralized Debt Obligations (CDOs) “Weapons of Financial Mass Destruction.” We know now there was an inherent “flaw” in Greenspan’s thinking. The calamity known as the mortgage-backed securities crisis and the subsequent outsized leverage that led to the banking collapse reveals the stark contrast between the 20th century view of mindless money and 21st century mindfulness. Over forty years ago, the renowned economist Milton Friedman made indifference stylish. He wrote famously, “The social responsibility of business is to pursue profits.” The 1970s icon described a world where money is a means to itself with no meaning or purpose other than to make more. It was a kind-of-brainwashing that catapulted self- interest to a high “moral” ideal. It is no wonder that within two decades, greed became exalted. So that brings me back to the good Wall Street. Where is it? What is it? And how do we support it? For far too long, the good Wall Street has been silenced. It has been considered “weak” to speak about social responsibility in finance or the common good co-existing with market share. In a conversation with a senior managing director at a top investment bank (detailed in my book below, Conversations with Wall Street ) , he explained the powerful backlash from colleagues, underlings, and superiors he experienced when voicing objections to buying $5billion dollar blocks of 100% Loan-to-Value (100LTV) loan pools. He remarked, “I knew they were bad loans and we shouldn’t be securitizing these. People have to have skin in the game.” His view was that borrowers with zero investment in their homes would have little incentive to pay the loans back. He was out-voted. Why? “Because everyone was doing it,” he said, “So my colleagues thought, why not us?” The classic Henrik Ibsen play, ” An Enemy of the People ” revolves around the human struggle between greed and moral rectitude. The story reveals one man’s (Dr. Stockman) struggle to do the right thing in the face of extreme opposition. The good doctor threatens his hometown’s tourist industry by discovering that waste products are contaminating the water system. He brings the issue to his brother, the town’s Mayor, who silences him. The townspeople also ignore his warnings and prefer to risk the health of tourists rather than threaten their livelihood. This powerful drama takes place in 1883 Norway, not contemporary Wall Street. It proves that the conflict between self-interest and world interest is a fundamentally human one. The investment banker who warned his firm of loan toxicity ultimately gave in to his superiors. He explained, “I look back on it and see the problem. I had hundreds of people in that division. The decision to make was to exit the business. Yet, every other firm was reporting record earnings, which turned out to be fictitious. Here is my boss telling me, figure it out or you’re fired. You do the best you can within the institutional architecture. So what do you do? The CEO is pressuring us to build the mortgage business. He was taking the firm from 12 to 1 to 35 to 1 in leverage. If he hadn’t done that, then we couldn’t have done the business. It was top down pressure. You can look back on this and say that accountability was way too diffuse. There was no one single person who answered for it. That is what has gone wrong with the securitization model in my mind. No accountability. Used to you be you had a loan officer who was accountable – now you don’t.” The lack of accountability from the top levels of the mortgage markets and government is currently fueling public outrage. Very simply, we are at this place of economic despair from a tragic failure in responsible leadership: one that can be traced to the absence of reasonable risk safeguards in the system. And one that can be traced back to the Gordon Gekko view that “greed was good.” The same can be said for the millions who took out these 100LTV loans. If everyone is doing it, why shouldn’t you? The answer is simple: following the herd can sometimes destroy the whole system. The fact is we are all accountable, because in the end each of us inevitably pays the price. Perhaps surprisingly, there were many finance professionals in the mortgage markets who objected to the lack of accountability, excessive leverage and irrational risk models: the “good” Wall Street who couldn’t stop the machine. To put the economy back on its feet, many investors and economists know we have to first fix the housing market. This means drastic and major triage to existing mortgage loans by reducing interest rates, credit terms and loan principals to current market values. The concept is morally reprehensible to lenders and investors alike. After all, borrowers took the loans on – “no one put a gun to their heads.” And that’s the problem: accountability must be across the board – not just on the side of borrowers. In the face of the extreme moral dilemma faced by many bankers and finance professionals, reason and realism gave way to risk and recklessness. Now it’s time for the good Wall Street to step up to the plate and resolve the problem that their less responsible brethren created. In the face of the growing contempt for the industry, the time to stand on the sidelines and be silent is over. The industry must create the solution for the current economic dilemma and show the world what’s good about Wall Street – that social responsibility, integrity and transparency in our 21st century financial models can generate big profits. And the simple recognition that going for the short-term kill leads to long-term disaster. Monika Mitchell is a renowned thought leader on socially responsible business and the co-author of a soon-to-be-released book, ” Conversations with Wall Street: The Inside Story of the Financial Armageddon and How to Prevent the Next One .”(ebook October, print November) editor@good-b.com

Read the full article →

BofA Reports First Increase In Customer Late Payments In A Year

October 17, 2011

NEW YORK (AP) — Bank of America Corp. on Monday reported a small increase in customer late payments for September. It was the first increase Bank of America reported for delinquencies, as they are known in the industry, in a year, and echoed similar increases reported by other major card issuers. Delinquencies are an important indicator of future default. The credit card division of the Charlotte, N.C.-based bank said in a regulatory filing that the rate its customers’ payments were late by 30 days or more rose to 3.99 percent of balances on an annualized basis, from 3.96 percent in August. The bank also said in the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission that the rate it wrote off credit card balances last month dropped to 5.99 percent of balances, annualized, from 6.79 percent in August. That was the first time the default rate dropped below 6 percent since before the 2008 financial crisis. Bank of America still has among the highest rate of default, or charge-offs, in the industry. But it is down substantially from the 14.53 percent the bank reported in August 2009. American Express Co. on Monday reported a slight increase in its late payment rate last month. But American Express’ late payments are still the lowest in the credit card industry. Credit card companies typically write off balances after they are 180 days past due, the point at which the companies assume they won’t be able to collect. Bank of America Corp. shares fell 16 cents, or 2.6 percent, to close at $6.03 on Monday. Markets were broadly lower, and the Dow Jones industrial average fell 2.1 percent.

Read the full article →

WATCH: Protestor Asks Girlfriend To ‘Occupy His Life’ In Marriage Proposal

October 17, 2011

“I don’t know what’s going to happen in this movement, but I hope it’s half as successful as our marriage is going to be.” Those were the words out of YouTube user bzdug ‘s mouth after getting down on one knee among protestors at New York’s Liberty Plaza to ask his now-fiance, Deb, to “occupy [his] life.” The proposal began with a call for a “mic check” and concluded with Deb’s definite “yes,” as a crowd of onlookers applauded and congratulated the newly engaged couple. The Occupy Wall Street protest against corporate greed has spread beyond the streets of New York and into other national and international cities. On Oct. 15, about 1,500 events took place in 82 countries , according to the Occupy Wall Street website. In Cincinnati, Ohio, a bride and groom didn’t let protestors at a local park ruin their wedding pictures . Instead, the couple, who support the movement, invited some of the protestors to be part of the special day.

Read the full article →

Immigrants To Wells Fargo: Stop Investing In For-Profit Detention

October 17, 2011

Latino and Somali immigrants are organizing in Minneapolis, Minn., against Wells Fargo, telling the bank to stop donating to anti-immigrant politicians and investing in private prison corporations while courting immigrant customers. About 150 people, many of them Wells Fargo customers and Latino or Somali immigrants, gathered outside a Wells Fargo branch on Saturday to protest the bank. The protest was part of a larger effort by 84 advocacy groups calling for Wells Fargo to divest its money from companies that profit off of immigrant detention. The protesters called Wells Fargo hypocritical for targeting Latinos and immigrant customers while also giving money to causes that immigrants largely oppose, such as private immigrant detention centers and bills that make it difficult to migrate legally to the United States. Wells Fargo uses its mutual funds to invest in two of the largest for-profit detention companies: Corrections Corporation of America and the GEO Group, both of which spend millions each year lobbying for stricter immigration enforcement. “On the one hand, Wells Fargo is launching coordinated ad campaigns around the country to recruit scores of new immigrant customers,” said Greg Nammacher, secretary-treasurer of Service Employees International Union Local 26, one of the organizers of a Saturday protest against the bank. “On the other hand, they’re financing the criminalization of immigrants through both support of anti-immigrant politicians and investing in companies like [Corrections Corporation of America].” The two private prison companies, along with a third major company called Management and Training Corporation, profit a combined $5 billion from immigrant detention, according to Brave New Foundation’s “Immigrants for Sale” project . They have acknowledged that a slower pace of immigration enforcement would hurt their bottom line, with Corrections Corporation of America writing in its 2010 annual report that “the relaxation of enforcement efforts” could reduce demand for their services. Both companies have been accused of cutting corners and hiring guards and workers who mistreat immigrant detainees. As of December 2010, Wells Fargo had invested $5.9 million in Corrections Corporation of America and $88.7 million in the GEO Group, In These Times reported in July. Wells Fargo said its critics were misinformed that it invested its own funds in Corrections Corporation of America or the GEO Group, and said that any investments in the companies were made by Wells Fargo mutual funds using money from clients. “Wells Fargo respects the seriousness of our country’s ongoing debate on immigration reform,” Wells Fargo spokesman John Roehm said in a statement. “However, we do not, as a corporation, take positions on public policy issues that do not directly affect our company’s ability to serve customers and support team members.” Wells Fargo launched a new effort in April to gain Latino customers by educating them about banking in 13 cities. The bank also runs Spanish-language ads targeting potential Latino customers. Meanwhile, they have not responded to appeals from immigration advocacy groups to divest their money from the companies, Nammacher said. “The immigrant community has no intention of standing by while Wells Fargo finances their own demise using their own deposits,” he said. “Companies like Wells Fargo that are entrenched in our broken immigration system, they’re either going to be a part of propagating the problem or they’ll be responsible and divest from anti-immigrant corporations and politicians.” The Wells Fargo Employee PAC has donated to politicians who have proposed crackdowns on unauthorized immigration, including Rep. Lamar Smith (R-Texas), an advocate of more immigration enforcement , and Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-Minn.). Bachmann has struck a hard-line stance on undocumented immigration during her campaign for the GOP presidential nomination, promising in a Saturday speech to impose stricter border enforcement if she wins the presidency. Of course, not all immigrants oppose increasing border enforcement or deportations, or favor easier paths to citizenship. But among Latinos, 38 percent of whom are immigrants and 19 percent are undocumented, a strong majority oppose crackdowns on unauthorized immigration, according to 2010 estimates from the Pew Hispanic Center . Most Latinos also support paths to citizenship for undocumented immigrants already in the country, according to the Pew report, a move that politicians like Bachmann decry as amnesty. One protester, Ibrahim Nur, said he was especially angry that the Wells Fargo Employee PAC donated money to Rep. John Kline (R-Minn.), who opposes comprehensive immigration reform. Nur became a citizen six years ago, but wants to see changes to the immigration system so he can more easily bring his family over from Somalia. Nur opened an account at Wells Fargo in 2003, and worked there as a security guard from 2006 until earlier this year. But he may take his money elsewhere now that he knows the Wells Fargo Employee PAC donates money to politicians who oppose immigration reform. “All of the money that I was paying, I realized that was going to a politician named John Kline, who is against immigration stuff,” Nur said. “It takes forever to bring [family] here because of the laws that we have here. … This politician makes it even harder.” CORRECTION: An earlier version of this story stated that Wells Fargo is a stockholder in two of the largest for-profit detention companies. It has been corrected to indicate that Wells Fargo uses its mutual funds to invest in the companies. The story has also been updated to include a comment from Wells Fargo.

Read the full article →

Immigrants To Wells Fargo: Stop Investing In For-Profit Detention

October 17, 2011

Latino and Somali immigrants are organizing in Minneapolis, Minn., against Wells Fargo, telling the bank to stop donating to anti-immigrant politicians and investing in private prison corporations while courting immigrant customers. About 150 people, many of them Wells Fargo customers and Latino or Somali immigrants, gathered outside a Wells Fargo branch on Saturday to protest the bank. The protest was part of a larger effort by 84 advocacy groups calling for Wells Fargo to divest its money from companies that profit off of immigrant detention. The protesters called Wells Fargo hypocritical for targeting Latinos and immigrant customers while also giving money to causes that immigrants largely oppose, such as private immigrant detention centers and bills that make it difficult to migrate legally to the United States. Wells Fargo uses its mutual funds to invest in two of the largest for-profit detention companies: Corrections Corporation of America and the GEO Group, both of which spend millions each year lobbying for stricter immigration enforcement. “On the one hand, Wells Fargo is launching coordinated ad campaigns around the country to recruit scores of new immigrant customers,” said Greg Nammacher, secretary-treasurer of Service Employees International Union Local 26, one of the organizers of a Saturday protest against the bank. “On the other hand, they’re financing the criminalization of immigrants through both support of anti-immigrant politicians and investing in companies like [Corrections Corporation of America].” The two private prison companies, along with a third major company called Management and Training Corporation, profit a combined $5 billion from immigrant detention, according to Brave New Foundation’s “Immigrants for Sale” project . They have acknowledged that a slower pace of immigration enforcement would hurt their bottom line, with Corrections Corporation of America writing in its 2010 annual report that “the relaxation of enforcement efforts” could reduce demand for their services. Both companies have been accused of cutting corners and hiring guards and workers who mistreat immigrant detainees. As of December 2010, Wells Fargo had invested $5.9 million in Corrections Corporation of America and $88.7 million in the GEO Group, In These Times reported in July. Wells Fargo said its critics were misinformed that it invested its own funds in Corrections Corporation of America or the GEO Group, and said that any investments in the companies were made by Wells Fargo mutual funds using money from clients. “Wells Fargo respects the seriousness of our country’s ongoing debate on immigration reform,” Wells Fargo spokesman John Roehm said in a statement. “However, we do not, as a corporation, take positions on public policy issues that do not directly affect our company’s ability to serve customers and support team members.” Wells Fargo launched a new effort in April to gain Latino customers by educating them about banking in 13 cities. The bank also runs Spanish-language ads targeting potential Latino customers. Meanwhile, they have not responded to appeals from immigration advocacy groups to divest their money from the companies, Nammacher said. “The immigrant community has no intention of standing by while Wells Fargo finances their own demise using their own deposits,” he said. “Companies like Wells Fargo that are entrenched in our broken immigration system, they’re either going to be a part of propagating the problem or they’ll be responsible and divest from anti-immigrant corporations and politicians.” The Wells Fargo Employee PAC has donated to politicians who have proposed crackdowns on unauthorized immigration, including Rep. Lamar Smith (R-Texas), an advocate of more immigration enforcement , and Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-Minn.). Bachmann has struck a hard-line stance on undocumented immigration during her campaign for the GOP presidential nomination, promising in a Saturday speech to impose stricter border enforcement if she wins the presidency. Of course, not all immigrants oppose increasing border enforcement or deportations, or favor easier paths to citizenship. But among Latinos, 38 percent of whom are immigrants and 19 percent are undocumented, a strong majority oppose crackdowns on unauthorized immigration, according to 2010 estimates from the Pew Hispanic Center . Most Latinos also support paths to citizenship for undocumented immigrants already in the country, according to the Pew report, a move that politicians like Bachmann decry as amnesty. One protester, Ibrahim Nur, said he was especially angry that the Wells Fargo Employee PAC donated money to Rep. John Kline (R-Minn.), who opposes comprehensive immigration reform. Nur became a citizen six years ago, but wants to see changes to the immigration system so he can more easily bring his family over from Somalia. Nur opened an account at Wells Fargo in 2003, and worked there as a security guard from 2006 until earlier this year. But he may take his money elsewhere now that he knows the Wells Fargo Employee PAC donates money to politicians who oppose immigration reform. “All of the money that I was paying, I realized that was going to a politician named John Kline, who is against immigration stuff,” Nur said. “It takes forever to bring [family] here because of the laws that we have here. … This politician makes it even harder.” CORRECTION: An earlier version of this story stated that Wells Fargo is a stockholder in two of the largest for-profit detention companies. It has been corrected to indicate that Wells Fargo uses its mutual funds to invest in the companies. The story has also been updated to include a comment from Wells Fargo.

Read the full article →

FDA Panel Unanimously Votes Down Parkinson’s Drug Azilect

October 17, 2011

WASHINGTON — A federal health panel unanimously voted Monday that a drug for Parkinson’s disease from Teva Pharmaceuticals has not been shown to slow progress of the debilitating neurological disease. Teva’s drug Azilect is already approved to treat symptoms of Parkinson’s, which causes tremors, muscle stiffness and a host of other movement problems. The Israeli drugmaker has asked the Food and Drug Administration to expand approval so that Azilect can be prescribed to slow the underlying disease. Currently no treatments are approved for that use. But the FDA’s panel of outside experts voted 17-0 against recommending approval for that use, saying the company’s clinical study results were not convincing. “I believe the drug shows signs of effectiveness for symptomatic use, for which it is already approved. But the higher bar is whether it does anything for disease modification, and it did not meet that standard,” said Dr. Justin Zivin of the University of California, San Diego. Much of the panel discussion revolved around the limitations of Teva’s trial design and the difficulty of distinguishing between improved symptoms and actually slowing the disease itself. Teva studied Azilect in 1,176 patients with very early Parkinson’s disease, who had not been treated previously. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either Azilect or a placebo for nine months, after which those taking placebo were switched to the drug for another nine months. The patients originally on Azilect continued taking the drug for the entire study. The trial was designed to test whether those taking Azilect for the longer period showed more improvement, suggesting the drug slowed progression of their disease. A 1 milligram dose of the drug appeared to slow patients’ disease based on a rating scale that measures symptoms and disease progression, including its effects on mental state, motor skills and daily activities. But the results were plagued by statistical inconsistencies, and a 2 milligram dose of the drug failed to show similar results. “In medical science, things have to make sense, and they have to be consistent,” said Dr. Eric Ahlskog of the Mayo Clinic, explaining his vote against the drug. More than 5 million people worldwide, including more than a million in North America, have Parkinson’s, according to the National Institutes of Health. The disease is characterized by increasingly severe tremors and periodically stiff or frozen limbs. Patients gradually lose brain cells that produce dopamine, a chemical key to the circuitry that controls muscle movement. There is no cure, although dopamine-boosting medication and an implanted device called deep brain stimulation can reduce some symptoms. The cause of the disease is unknown. Earlier in the day, advocates for Parkinson’s patients expressed frustration over the lack of clear markers for evaluating drugs’ effectiveness for slowing the disease. Some researchers have suggested that brain imaging scans could be used to track disease progression, but so far no consensus has been reached. “We need a path forward. If this isn’t it, what is?” asked James Langston, CEO of the Parkinson’s Institute and Clinical Center in Sunnyvale, Calif. “We need guidance if we’re going to stay in this field.” Shares of Teva Pharmaceuticals Industries Limited rose 21 cents to $39.50 in afterhours trading.

Read the full article →

FDA Panel Unanimously Votes Down Parkinson’s Drug Azilect

October 17, 2011

WASHINGTON — A federal health panel unanimously voted Monday that a drug for Parkinson’s disease from Teva Pharmaceuticals has not been shown to slow progress of the debilitating neurological disease. Teva’s drug Azilect is already approved to treat symptoms of Parkinson’s, which causes tremors, muscle stiffness and a host of other movement problems. The Israeli drugmaker has asked the Food and Drug Administration to expand approval so that Azilect can be prescribed to slow the underlying disease. Currently no treatments are approved for that use. But the FDA’s panel of outside experts voted 17-0 against recommending approval for that use, saying the company’s clinical study results were not convincing. “I believe the drug shows signs of effectiveness for symptomatic use, for which it is already approved. But the higher bar is whether it does anything for disease modification, and it did not meet that standard,” said Dr. Justin Zivin of the University of California, San Diego. Much of the panel discussion revolved around the limitations of Teva’s trial design and the difficulty of distinguishing between improved symptoms and actually slowing the disease itself. Teva studied Azilect in 1,176 patients with very early Parkinson’s disease, who had not been treated previously. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either Azilect or a placebo for nine months, after which those taking placebo were switched to the drug for another nine months. The patients originally on Azilect continued taking the drug for the entire study. The trial was designed to test whether those taking Azilect for the longer period showed more improvement, suggesting the drug slowed progression of their disease. A 1 milligram dose of the drug appeared to slow patients’ disease based on a rating scale that measures symptoms and disease progression, including its effects on mental state, motor skills and daily activities. But the results were plagued by statistical inconsistencies, and a 2 milligram dose of the drug failed to show similar results. “In medical science, things have to make sense, and they have to be consistent,” said Dr. Eric Ahlskog of the Mayo Clinic, explaining his vote against the drug. More than 5 million people worldwide, including more than a million in North America, have Parkinson’s, according to the National Institutes of Health. The disease is characterized by increasingly severe tremors and periodically stiff or frozen limbs. Patients gradually lose brain cells that produce dopamine, a chemical key to the circuitry that controls muscle movement. There is no cure, although dopamine-boosting medication and an implanted device called deep brain stimulation can reduce some symptoms. The cause of the disease is unknown. Earlier in the day, advocates for Parkinson’s patients expressed frustration over the lack of clear markers for evaluating drugs’ effectiveness for slowing the disease. Some researchers have suggested that brain imaging scans could be used to track disease progression, but so far no consensus has been reached. “We need a path forward. If this isn’t it, what is?” asked James Langston, CEO of the Parkinson’s Institute and Clinical Center in Sunnyvale, Calif. “We need guidance if we’re going to stay in this field.” Shares of Teva Pharmaceuticals Industries Limited rose 21 cents to $39.50 in afterhours trading.

Read the full article →

Politicians React To Occupy Wall Street Movement

October 17, 2011

It’s been one month since the Occupy Wall Street protests started in mid-September in New York City. The movement has now spread across the United States and other parts of the world, escalating to an estimated 20,000-person march on Times Square on October 15. President Barack Obama, Vice President Joe Biden, the 2012 Republican candidates and many other prominent politicians on both sides of the aisle have been forced to respond to the movement. Check out their reactions in the slideshow below and vote on the most appropriate response:

Read the full article →

Politicians React To Occupy Wall Street Movement

October 17, 2011

It’s been one month since the Occupy Wall Street protests started in mid-September in New York City. The movement has now spread across the United States and other parts of the world, escalating to an estimated 20,000-person march on Times Square on October 15. President Barack Obama, Vice President Joe Biden, the 2012 Republican candidates and many other prominent politicians on both sides of the aisle have been forced to respond to the movement. Check out their reactions in the slideshow below and vote on the most appropriate response:

Read the full article →

The Cost Of Unhealthy Employees: $153 Billion In Lost Productivity

October 17, 2011

A new Gallup poll estimates that unhealthy workers cost businesses $153 billion a year in lost productivity. Nearly 110,000 full-time employees were surveyed, self-reporting their height, weight and chronic medical conditions. According to the poll, only about one in seven employees — 13.9 percent of the workforce — is of normal weight with no chronic condition, logging an average of just .34 unhealthy days per month, or 4 sick days per year. Those who were overweight or obese but who had no chronic conditions reported an average .36 unhealthy days per month. But the more than 30 percent of the population who reported being overweight or obese with one to two chronic conditions missed an average of 1.08 days per month due to poor health, adding up to over $32 billion in lost productivity. Those who said they were overweight or obese with three or more chronic conditions recorded over 3 unhealthy days per month, averaging 42 days per year and totaling $81 billion in losses. The study took into account several chronic conditions, including whether the subject had a heart attack, high blood pressure, high cholesterol, cancer, diabetes, asthma, depression and reoccurring physical pain in the neck, back, knee or leg for the last 12 months. Surprisingly, the total cost of lost productivity in the U.S. — $153 billion — is four times greater than in the U.K., where 20 percent of the full-time workforce is healthy. The studies’ authors claim that the estimated $153 billion loss is actually much greater due to factors not included in the poll, including the health of part-time workers and the “presenteeism” issue, in which an employee goes to work but is less productive due to poor health. Another study conducted by the Milken Institute broadens the factors by including other chronic disorders, and in turn reports that ill health actually costs employers $1.1 trillion annually, while $277 billion is spent on treatment. According to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics , private industries with fewer than 100 employees provided workers with an average of 6 paid sick days, costing private firms 23 cents per employee for every hour worked. However, this average only accounts for recorded sick days and does not take into account the cost of employee presenteeism and limited productivity.

Read the full article →

The Cost Of Unhealthy Employees: $153 Billion In Lost Productivity

October 17, 2011

A new Gallup poll estimates that unhealthy workers cost businesses $153 billion a year in lost productivity. Nearly 110,000 full-time employees were surveyed, self-reporting their height, weight and chronic medical conditions. According to the poll, only about one in seven employees — 13.9 percent of the workforce — is of normal weight with no chronic condition, logging an average of just .34 unhealthy days per month, or 4 sick days per year. Those who were overweight or obese but who had no chronic conditions reported an average .36 unhealthy days per month. But the more than 30 percent of the population who reported being overweight or obese with one to two chronic conditions missed an average of 1.08 days per month due to poor health, adding up to over $32 billion in lost productivity. Those who said they were overweight or obese with three or more chronic conditions recorded over 3 unhealthy days per month, averaging 42 days per year and totaling $81 billion in losses. The study took into account several chronic conditions, including whether the subject had a heart attack, high blood pressure, high cholesterol, cancer, diabetes, asthma, depression and reoccurring physical pain in the neck, back, knee or leg for the last 12 months. Surprisingly, the total cost of lost productivity in the U.S. — $153 billion — is four times greater than in the U.K., where 20 percent of the full-time workforce is healthy. The studies’ authors claim that the estimated $153 billion loss is actually much greater due to factors not included in the poll, including the health of part-time workers and the “presenteeism” issue, in which an employee goes to work but is less productive due to poor health. Another study conducted by the Milken Institute broadens the factors by including other chronic disorders, and in turn reports that ill health actually costs employers $1.1 trillion annually, while $277 billion is spent on treatment. According to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics , private industries with fewer than 100 employees provided workers with an average of 6 paid sick days, costing private firms 23 cents per employee for every hour worked. However, this average only accounts for recorded sick days and does not take into account the cost of employee presenteeism and limited productivity.

Read the full article →

Bill Ong Hing: Free Trade Agreements Mean Job Losses in the Other Country as Well

October 17, 2011

With great fanfare recently, Congress approved Free Trade Agreements (FTAs) with Colombia, Panama, and South Korea. Congress, the White House, and big business cheered, while labor groups derided the move, arguing that the FTAs will result in more U.S. job losses. Obscured by the the debate, however, is the potential for negative economic effects in the partner countries as well. Take Mexico as an example. Within a year of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) finalized in 1994, Mexico lost a million jobs . The U.S. continued to subsidize U.S. farmers, and Mexican corn farmers, for instance, could not compete with the price of U.S. corn in their own backyard. Now the vast majority of corn purchased in Mexico is U.S. corn, and more than a million Mexican farmers lost their work. Mexican workers who were helping to produce pork products and auto parts lost their livelihood as well. Is there little wonder that many of those displaced by NAFTA look to the United States as a place to find work? Why this result? An FTA is a pact between two countries that agree to lift most or all tariffs, quotas, special fees and taxes, and other barriers to trade. The purpose of FTAs is to allow faster and more business between the two countries which would benefit both. The economic theory underlying FTAs is the concept of comparative advantage , which asserts that in a free marketplace, each country will specialize in the activity in which it has a comparative advantage (that is, natural resources, skilled artisans, agriculture-friendly weather, and the like). Since each country is specializing in a particular area or product, each country should mutually benefit from the agreement and generate more overall income. The problem is that FTAs increase globalization and outsourcing, but countries that benefit from the outsourcing are generally the low-bidder, which may not be one of the partner nations to the FTA. So in spite of Mexico’s comparative advantage (cheaper labor than in the United States) and being next to the world’s largest economy, Mexico got blindsided by China because Mexico was also persuaded to enter the World Trade Organization. Mexico lost hundreds of thousands of jobs to China, and in the process was replaced by China as the largest trading partner with the United States. Maquiladoras also have not been the savior of the Mexican economy. These are assembly plants located across the border from the United States that are authorized to export products duty-free to the United States or Canada as a NAFTA product. Most of the electronics components come into Mexico duty-free from Asia. But maquiladora job growth reveals a real problem with a strategy that relies on the use of cheap labor for exports. For economic development to be sustained over time, the best paradigm would involve linking manufacturing companies with local businesses that supply materials, parts, or services. But maquiladoras are simply about low-wage workers, and the companies bring in components from outside Mexico with little connection to local businesses and the rest of the economy. Little transfer in technology takes place. The phenomenon occurs elsewhere around the globe, and the problem is that multinationals that set up shop this way can abandon a particular country when cheaper labor is found in a different country. Much is often made of the fact that Mexico now has a trade surplus with the United States, but while many U.S. jobs did go south, Mexico lost far more jobs because of the treaty than those relocated from the United States. If the workers in bi-lateral countries involved in FTA agreements stand to lose, who gains? The multinational corporations. In an era of globalization, there is greater competition, improved technology, communication, and travel. This allows corporate America to exploit cheap labor and increase profits. Low-wage competition on a world stage is a trap. Panama, Colombia, and South Korea, with FTA provisions reminiscent to those in NAFTA, better look out. The profit-makers are there to use them.

Read the full article →

Does This Family Deserve To Lose Its Home?

October 17, 2011

ALAMOGORDO, N.M. — From next to the dead tree in his backyard, Ernie Soto can see the big house where he used to live. It’s perched on the side of a mountain overlooking Alamogordo, a town of 36,000 on the eastern edge of New Mexico’s Tularosa Basin. In 2007 Soto moved downhill to a smaller house with his wife and son. They needed fewer rooms since their grown son and daughter had moved out, and Soto wanted to sell the big house and use the proceeds to start a mechanic business. He figured he’d be better off as an entrepreneur in case the economy worsened. Their downward mobility has continued, thanks to both mistakes and misfortune. “We just couldn’t backpedal fast enough,” he says. A guy moved into the bigger house in a rent-to-own situation, Soto says, but the guy died. Then Soto’s daughter got sick. He gave up trying to start his business when financing fell through. Then he lost his job. And now he’s fighting to keep the smaller house. He’s a conservative Republican, but he thinks he deserves a break, a little leniency, so he can keep his home even though he hasn’t made a mortgage payment since 2009. Soto’s congressman, a conservative Republican who’s voted to repeal the government’s anti-foreclosure programs, has shown sympathy to his constituent by helping him apply for one of those programs. Soto’s struggling against unemployment and foreclosure, the same problems afflicting tens of millions of people across the U.S., problems that pushed more than 2 million into poverty in 2010. Like many who’ve lost their jobs and homes during the Great Recession, Soto harbors a grievance against the bankers who precipitated the crisis and paid themselves bonuses after taxpayers bailed them out. While politicians regularly vow to fight for people who face the loss of their homes and jobs “through no fault of their own,” reality is rarely that simple. And it’s exemplified by the story of Ernie Soto, a hardworking, conservative family man who made questionable financial decisions in hard times, but who never got a bailout. Soto asks, “Can I have just a tiny taste of the pie?” * * * * * Soto bought the smaller property, a one-story single-family home made from red bricks and white stucco, for $146,300 in June 2007. Inside there are three bedrooms, a huge stone fireplace in the living room and a sunken TV den next to the kitchen. Outside there’s a spacious back yard with patchy grass. The bigger house boasts two stories, four bedrooms and a more distinctive Southwestern style. Soto says that when a man moved into the house in 2008 and started paying rent, he expected the man to buy the place. But then the man died at age 57 that November. The man’s obituary doesn’t say how he died, and relatives did not return phone calls. Soto says he heard the man had a heart attack and that in hindsight, “I should have made him pay for the property before I bought mine.” Soto found himself on the hook for two mortgages at the same time his daughter was going through a bad divorce and a cervical cancer scare that resulted in $5,000 worth of legal and hospital bills. With the business expenses, it added up to more than he felt he could handle. “I was faced with a short-term financial tsunami of around $33,000,” he says. He used savings to stay current on both mortgages through the first half of 2009. He tried to convince his lenders that he couldn’t keep it up for long when he asked for lower payments. He says they turned him down because he made too much money. And he says a loan he needed for working capital to start his business fell through. He and his wife, Priscilla, who works as a house and office cleaner, together earned between $80,000 and $90,000 in 2007 and 2008. But he’d already borrowed $350,000 to launch the car repair company and owed $400,000 on the two houses. As business loan payments came due, Soto worried he’d have no money left for his family. “Everything we pumped in, all the agreements we made with suppliers, leases for equipment, that house, this house, our existing bills,” he says. “It was about three quarters of a million dollars almost, and I said, it’s too much and now I need to hang to some of that money to help protect our daughter.” Soto says he told his lenders the same thing he told his own family: He feared he wouldn’t be able to maintain his income. “I warned [them] because of the car business, the car business was bad and I told [them] it’s just a matter of time. And I told my wife we’d better hang on, I’ve got a feeling something’s gonna happen, I’m gonna lose my job. I see it, I’ve been in it for so long.” A government-certified housing counselor advised him to consult a lawyer. He filed for bankruptcy protection in June of 2009. By that time he and his wife’s average monthly expenses reached $6,338, outstripping their monthly income by $450, according to court documents from the bankruptcy. The Sotos were sinking in debt. They kept their jobs though and continued trying to negotiate a mortgage modification. The process frustrated Soto: He says his loan changed hands three times, his lenders repeatedly asked him to resubmit the same documents, and he could never speak to the same person twice — an utterly common set of complaints for a homeowner seeking a mortgage modification. Not even thousand-dollar incentive payments from the government have been enough to encourage banks to treat homeowners decently when they seek loan mods; the Obama administration’s signature foreclosure prevention program has helped fewer than 700,000. More than a million have been bounced out of the program, and the reasons for rejection are often unclear. In early 2009 President Obama said the program would help 3 to 4 million homeowners. Another refinancing initiative was supposed to reach 4 to 5 million. Both programs are failures; the foreclosure crisis rolls on. A key reason Soto thought he deserved a break, aside from the bank bailouts, was that he owed more than his house was worth, a consequence of the housing bubble inflated and left shriveled by the financial sector. In 2009, Soto’s home was worth at least 10 percent less than the amount he’d borrowed to pay for it. If Wall Street already got bailed out, Soto wondered why he should have to keep lining bankers’ pockets with bubble-sized monthly payments? The following December, he quit paying and moved to a nearby trailer park. Instead of sending money to banks, he started sending furious emails to news organizations. “My modification went no where even with timely payments and mountains of paperwork sent to all of them,” he wrote to HuffPost in 2010. “After several months of this I had enough, they can all kiss my @$$! I have always had great credit and paid my obligations on time, but where was everyone else when I need them.” Shame and fear prevent more homeowners from doing what Soto did. While nearly a quarter of all American mortgages are “underwater” like Soto’s, one analysis puts the the rate of “strategic default” at just 2.5 or 3.5 percent. Soto’s shame had given way to fury. Priscilla says she could sense her husband’s anger just from the way he typed. She mimicked his hands going up and down on the keyboard with loud clickety-clack noises. “I was mad. I was mad at the bankers, I was mad at the mortgage companies and everything,” Soto says. “We couldn’t stand for no more pain, no more humiliation, so we just discreetly got our things, moved out — the neighbors were like, ‘What’s going on?’ I’ve always been a good citizen, paid my bills. All I could say was just fuck everybody.” Soto lost his job at the dealership in April of 2010. He spent a couple months unemployed before finding another service manager gig at a dealership in Hobbs, nearly 200 miles away. At first, the company paid for his gas and motel stays, but he says those perks vanished when the place offered him a full time gig. The expenses, combined with the inconvenience of working so far from his distressed family, led him to quit. * * * * * Things got better this year. In April, Soto landed a job at a rent-to-own furniture store in El Paso. The drive from Alamogordo took longer than an hour, but Soto scored a new placement near his home after several weeks of training. The job had a tremendous downside: Soto had to take people’s stuff away when they failed to make payments. He recalls visiting a rundown trailer in El Paso during the springtime. The trailer looked so bad, Soto says he thought nobody could live inside. “We got up there and knocked on the door and here comes out the guy and his daughter, a little cute two- or three-year-old girl, was holding a doll, and I’m thinking, ‘Oh my God.’ Here we are taking their furniture and washer and dryer. I walked in and the floor wasn’t really a floor. I think they had a dining table. I don’t know if they even had a TV. It was a pretty sad sight.” And it was a lesson for the man’s poor daughter: “The little girl’s asking the daddy, why are they here? He goes, ‘This is what happens when you don’t pay the bill.’ ” Soto knows well the indignity of having stuff repossessed. It happened to him in 2009 when the company that lent them $24,000 for a pickup truck in 2005 asked the bankruptcy court to let them take it back, which the court said would be fine. The repo guy found Soto in the parking lot of Alamogordo’s Ark Animal Hospital. Soto had gone there to put down Petey, his cancer-stricken pit bull. Petey was already giving Soto a hard time about going into the unfamiliar building, stiffening up as if he knew something bad would happen. “I never saw him act that way,” Soto says. The repo guy made it all harder. Soto says he asked the man if he’d let him keep the truck a little longer. The guy got on the phone with a supervisor, hoping to get out of the gruesome task, but the higher-up insisted the vehicle be taken. Soto says Priscilla showed up, the repo guy took the truck, and then they went inside and Petey died in Priscilla’s arms before they both went back to work. Soto says the episode was a low point that contributed to his later decision to deliberately default on his mortgage. Despite the humiliation of repossession, Soto has no beef with rent-to-own. “Not everybody has a lot of money these days to go out and plunk down money for furniture. So I thought it was a really neat way for people to be able to obtain furniture with the option of buying.” So things were going well this year. And then Soto heard about a temporary federal program that helped struggling homeowners catch up on their mortgages with a forgivable loan that also subsidized monthly payments. He had to live in his house to be eligible, and the banks hadn’t bothered to seize his since he abandoned it at the end of 2009. “Okay, I’ll move my ass back in there,” he says he told himself. He packed up his family and moved out of the trailer and back into the smaller of the two houses halfway through July. He only had a couple weeks to gather all the documents he needed to apply for the program, which was called the Emergency Homeowers’ Loan Program (the Obama administration later extended the deadline). HuffPost had included Soto in a story about homeowners who’d walked away from their mortgages in February. When he walked back to his mortgage five months later, HuffPost covered that event as well . The second story caught the attention of staffers for Rep. Steve Pearce, the Republican who represents Soto’s District (and for whom Soto voted in 2010). The staffers got in touch with their constituent with the help of a HuffPost reporter and launched an effort to help Soto apply for EHLP. Delinquent borrowers willing and able to pay their mortgages, but whose income had fallen by at least 15 percent, were eligible for the program, which had been created with $1 billion from the Dodd-Frank Wall Street reform bill passed in 2010. Pearce’s staffers may have had an impact on Soto’s case: On Aug. 2, the Department of Housing and Urban Development sent Soto a letter informing him he’d been selected in a random lottery for preliminary approval for the Emergency Homeowners’ Loan Program. The letter prompted Soto to send a packet of documents to complete a full application. Soto brought the letter to a meet-and-greet with Pearce at a mall in Alamogordo on Aug. 9, where the congressman posed with the Soto family for a photo that the congressman put on Facebook that day. Pearce signed Soto’s HUD envelope: “Ernie, God Bless.” “He’s a great guy,” Soto says. At the same time he applied for government help, Soto renewed his efforts to get a loan modification with Ocwen, the company servicing his mortgage. On Aug. 4, Ocwen sent a proposal. It said Soto could make monthly payments of $893.38; he’d previously paid more than $1,200 a month. (Though Soto says that when he called Ocwen, he was told his actual monthly payment would be higher by a couple hundred dollars.) The modification would jack his principal amount from $146,000 to nearly $168,000 — meaning Soto’s mortgage would be even deeper underwater than before. Otero county records indicate his property is worth $142,000. A real estate agent told Soto in September he should list it for $119,000 if he wanted to interest potential buyers. * * * * * Soto had no heat or electricity when he returned to the house this summer. He says he paid $1,100 to get power, but a plumber told him reconnecting the gas would cost a lot more. That’s why Soto’s tap runs cold and he uses the sun to warm jugs of water in his yard. If the coming winter gets as cold as it did in February, when temperatures fell below freezing, Soto will have to rely on space heaters and his ridiculously large fireplace. That is, he’ll have to rely on those things if he stays in the home. He’d have more money to fix the gas if the furniture company employing him hadn’t closed its Alamogordo store in September. Soto waited weeks to tell his lenders and his congressman’s helpful staff that he’d lost his job again. Like most of New Mexico, Alamogordo is a place of low unemployment and low incomes. Soto is trying to find another auto repair gig. He says he’s not desperate enough to start flipping burgers, but he’s not too proud to scrub toilets, either. He’s been helping Priscilla clean homes and offices. Soto says a Pearce staffer offered to help him find a job. He figures he’ll have to leave his home. He doesn’t relish the prospect of throwing money at an underwater mortgage anyway, and he doesn’t think he’ll get final approval for EHLP now that he’s unemployed. Borrowers who can’t make payments do not qualify. “The agencies are looking very carefully. They don’t know that he qualifies,” Pearce says. As for Soto, “He’s trying to make decisions what he wants to do. …There are jobs all over the district. Some areas are down to 3 percent unemployment. He may have to pick up and move.” For its part, the emergency loan program — like the administration’s other housing efforts — has fallen far short of its goals, with the government spending less than half the program’s $1 billion allocation and reaching a third of the 30,000 people it said it would help. If Pearce had had his way, the program would never have existed in the first place. Pearce joined House Republicans in voting to repeal the EHLP in March. “Many of these programs haven’t been working properly,” Pearce says. “They’re not really doing what they’re supposed to. They cost money. And so what we’re trying to figure out is how to see that the people who need help get it but the funds are not used just to feed the bureaucracy or used fraudulently.” Pearce has talked about the problems of homeowner help programs in a different way on the House floor. “I had a friend in the office today who talked about his situation with a house in Tucson where he got in at a higher price than it should have been,” he said in March. “He was willing to settle for a lesser amount. He was willing to pay. But because the bank could go to the government and make up the difference, they did not have to negotiate with this individual homeowner. Instead, this program causes lenders to say, the taxpayer will make us whole and we are not going to take our losses.” Through a spokeswoman, Pearce calls constituent service his top priority. “When a constituent reaches out to my office for help, we will go through government programs to get them help, if necessary,” Pearce says. “At that point, it is not a policy question, and it is not legislation based; instead, our offices work through the most efficient mediums available to ensure that individual cases do not slip through the cracks. As the Representative for New Mexico’s Second Congressional District, this is my job, and it is an honor to serve constituents in this manner.” Like her husband, Priscilla Soto is not optimistic they’ll get to stay in their current home. “I’m scared,” she says. “I don’t know where we’re going to end up or what we’re going to do.” One night in October, the three of us scamper up to the bigger house, which finally went for sale on courthouse steps in September, according to a court document Soto received. Soto and his wife cupped their hands around their faces to peer into the windows. We could hear coyotes howling down the mountain, somewhere between us and the twinkling lights of the city. “This is the main room here,” Soto says. “The fireplace … Stairs up to our bedroom … The kitchen’s over here.” He sighed loudly. There was nothing inside, but Priscilla remembered the big Christmas tree that you could see from the front door, which opened to an upper floor overlooking the living room below. WATCH: Arthur Delaney is the author of ” A People’s History of the Great Recession ,” HuffPost’s first e-book.

Read the full article →

GBP/USD Classical Technical Report 10.17

October 17, 2011

GBP/USD Classical Technical Report 10.17

Read the full article →

USD/JPY Classical Technical Report 10.17

October 17, 2011

USD/JPY Classical Technical Report 10.17

Read the full article →

USD/CHF Classical Technical Report 10.17

October 17, 2011

USD/CHF Classical Technical Report 10.17

Read the full article →

AUD/USD Classical Technical Report 10.17

October 17, 2011

AUD/USD Classical Technical Report 10.17

Read the full article →

USD/CAD Classical Technical Report 10.17

October 17, 2011

USD/CAD Classical Technical Report 10.17

Read the full article →

NZD/USD Classical Technical Report 10.17

October 17, 2011

NZD/USD Classical Technical Report 10.17

Read the full article →

EUR/JPY Classical Technical Report 10.17

October 17, 2011

EUR/JPY Classical Technical Report 10.17

Read the full article →

Dean Baker: Democracy Versus Bankers at the Fed

October 17, 2011

The Federal Reserve Board has provided the basis for thousands of conspiracy theories in its near-100-year existence. These conspiracies have some basis in reality as can be seen by the Fed’s recent moves on monetary policy. In the last two meetings of the Fed’s Open Market Committee (FOMC), the Fed’s key decision-making body, the members appointed through the political process unanimously supported stronger measures to spur growth and create jobs. By contrast, three of the five voting members appointed by the banking industry opposed further action. This extraordinary split has not received the attention it deserves. It suggests that the financial industry is using its power at the Fed to try to block the course preferred by the appointees of democratically elected officials of both parties. The Fed is an enormously important if poorly understood institution. Its control of monetary policy (primarily short-term interest rates) gives it the ability to speed up or slow growth. It also has enormous regulatory power. Alan Greenspan could have used this authority to put a check on the junk loans that fueled the housing bubble in the years 2002-2006. If the Fed wants to ensure that the economy does not grow too rapidly it can slow growth by pushing up interest rates. This was the cause of all the post-war recessions prior to the last two as the Fed raised interest rates in order to reduce growth and employment and thereby slow inflation. The Fed can also boost growth by lowering interest rates. To counteract the current recession, the Fed lowered its short-term rate to zero. Since this is as low as interest rates can go – the Fed can’t have negative interest rates – the Fed has tried to reduce long-term interest rates by measures such as the quantitative easing policies adopted in 2009 and 2010 and more recently the purchase of long-term bonds through “Operation Twist.” This is where the issues of control come in. The FOMC has 19 members. Seven of these members are governors of the Federal Reserve Board. These governors are appointed by the president and approved by Congress. They serve a 14-year term. The extraordinary length is intended to ensure their independence. They can use their best judgment without worrying that the current president or Congress will take away their job. However, the other 12 members of the FOMC are not appointed by democratically elected officials. They are the 12 regional bank presidents. While the process of selecting the regional bank presidents is somewhat complicated, it is largely controlled by the banks within a region. This means that 12 of the 19 members of the FOMC are selected by the banks. At any point in time, only 5 of the 12 bank presidents have a vote. This gives the governors a 7-5 majority among the voting members, even though they are outnumbered 12-7 on the FOMC as a whole. Most of the time decisions by the FOMC are unanimous. The FOMC typically discusses the current economic situation for 2-3 hours and considers possible actions. By the time a vote is called everyone has expressed their opinion so the outcome is already known. In the interest in showing support for the Fed, most members agree to support the majority decision to make it unanimous. Occasionally, one member will make a point of dissenting to show that he or she felt strongly about the issue being considered. The last two meetings of the FOMC were extraordinary in that they featured not one, but three dissents. Furthermore, it was striking that all three dissents came from the bank presidents who were appointed by the banking industry. The immediate issue at hand is whether the Fed should be trying to do more to boost growth and create jobs. The five governors (there are two vacancies) appointed through the democratic process all felt that it was important to do more to generate jobs. This was a bipartisan sentiment. Three of these members were appointed by President Obama, one was appointed by President Bush, and one (Chairman Bernanke) was appointed by both. However of the five people appointed by the banking industry, three voted against stronger measures. The likely explanation is that bankers don’t care much about unemployment. After all, they have jobs, as do most of their friends. On the other hand, inflation is really bad news for banks. It directly reduces the value of their assets. This means that when the Fed debates a policy that risks somewhat higher inflation in order to reduce unemployment, the bankers’ answer is to screw the unemployed. The outrageous part of this story is that the bankers don’t have to push their agenda as an outside interest group; they actually have seats directly given to them on the FOMC. This would be like letting Pfizer or Merck pick two of the five commissioners for the Food and Drug Administration or letting Comcast and Disney pick members of the Federal Communications Commission. All regulatory agencies are susceptible to inappropriate influence by the affected industry groups, but in the case of the Fed, the country’s most important regulatory body, the industry group is already on the inside. An overhaul of the Fed is long overdue. It should be turned into a body that directly answers to Congress just like every other regulatory agency. And the bankers must go. This would be a great way to mark the Fed’s 100th anniversary in 2013. We can make it an institution that is consistent with democracy.

Read the full article →

‘Occupy George’ Activists Stamp Income Inequality Graphics Onto Dollar Bills (PHOTOS)

October 17, 2011

Instead of broadcasting their views on a sign, Facebook group or Twitter, some supporters of the Occupy Wall Street protests are illustrating their frustrations on dollar bills. The group, calling itself Occupy George , is circulating dollar bills featuring infographics with facts about income inequality. One graphic includes a dotted line drawn through George Washington’s face with the words “Richest 400 Americans” on one side and “Bottom 150,000,000 Americans” on the other, indicating that the top 400 earners in America make as much as the bottom 150,000,000. In actuality, the disparity in incomes may even be worse than the graphic let on: The total net worth of the bottom 60 percent of Americans is less than that of Forbes 400 richest Americans . Another dollar bill drawing features pie charts illustrating the income growth disparity in the 1920s, 1960s and 2000s. The picture indicates the gap is wider now than it was during the Great Depression. The top one percent of earners netted two-thirds of the nation’s income gains from 2002 to 2007, which put income concentration at the highest level since 1928, according to the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities . The U.S. median income declined 7 percent in the last decade and though economists predict incomes will rise in the next 10 years it won’t be enough to get incomes back to pre-recession levels, the Wall Street Journal reports. At the same time, tax cuts for the wealthiest five percent of Americans are costing the U.S. government 11.6 million every hour , according to the National Priorities Project. Famed billionaire investor Warren Buffett advocated in an op-ed in The New York Times to end tax breaks for the “mega rich” as one way to close the income gap . The goal of Occupy George is to inform “the public of America’s daunting economic disparity one bill at a time,” according to its website . Here are dollar bill infographics from Occupy George :

Read the full article →

GBP/JPY Classical Technical Report 10.17

October 17, 2011

GBP/JPY Classical Technical Report 10.17

Read the full article →

US Dollar Index Classical Technical Report 10.17

October 17, 2011

US Dollar Index Classical Technical Report 10.17

Read the full article →

Usd/Nok Inching Closer to Our 5.50 Buy Entry Order

October 17, 2011

Usd/Nok Inching Closer to Our 5.50 Buy Entry Order

Read the full article →

Philips third quarter net income slumps

October 17, 2011

Philips third quarter net income slumps

Read the full article →

G20 pressure on European leaders increased optimism in the FX market

October 17, 2011

G20 pressure on European leaders increased optimism in the FX market

Read the full article →