October 2011

Goodyear Q3 net income up to USD161m

October 29, 2011

(MENAFN) Goodyear Tire & Rubber’s Co. chairman and CEO, Richard J. Kramer, said that as the company sold more tires, net income in the third quarter grew to USD161 million from a loss of USD20 …

Read the full article →

Top German court blocks fast trach German approval for bailout

October 29, 2011

(MENAFN – Saudi Press Agency) SPAGermany’s top court on Friday told the government it should stop relying on a selected group of lawmakers to obtain fast-track approval of eurozone bailout funds, …

Read the full article →

US Whirlpool Q3 net income rises to USD177m

October 29, 2011

(MENAFN) Whirlpool’s Corp. CEO, Jeff Fettig, said that net income in the third quarter surged to USD177 million compared with USD79 million in last year’s same period, reported Associated …

Read the full article →

Porsche Posts 25 per cent Rise in Profit

October 29, 2011

(MENAFN – Qatar News Agency) Luxury German sports carmaker Porsche said Friday its profits jumped 25 per cent during the first nine months of the year, following a surge in sales to Asia. The …

Read the full article →

UN Chief Calls For 3% Budget Cut

October 29, 2011

(MENAFN – Qatar News Agency) UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon has called for a 3 percent cut in the UN budget for the next 2 years in view of the difficult financial situation facing many member …

Read the full article →

Hedge Fund Sues Goldman Sachs For Fraud

October 29, 2011

A new lawsuit accuses Goldman Sachs of purposely unloading $93 million in mortgage-backed securities it knew to be junk onto a client, then betting against those same securities in the lead-up to the financial crisis. Basis Yield Alpha Fund, an Australian hedge fund, filed the lawsuit against Goldman Sachs on Thursday, asking for more than $1 billion in damages. The lawsuit alleges that Goldman Sachs overcharged for two sets of mortgage-backed securities that it sold to Basis; lied about the securities’ expected performance; did not provide timely, accurate information about the securities’ true value; and failed to disclose that the firm was actively betting against the securities at the time of the transaction — all which the hedge fund says contributed to its collapse. “They were lying to clients in order to get junk off their books,” said Eric Lewis, the Washington-based attorney who is leading the Basis Fund’s lawsuit against Goldman. “They were basically selling a time bomb … and what they sold blew up in our face, but what they couldn’t sell blew up in their face.” Goldman Sachs declined to comment on whether they believed at the time that the securities in question were a legitimately good investment. In a statement, they denied any wrongdoing and noted that Basis was an experienced hedge fund. “We believe that we acted appropriately and refute in the strongest possible terms any suggestion that Basis Capital was misled in any way,” Goldman Sachs said in the statement. “Goldman Sachs was also an investor in Timberwolf securities and lost several hundred million dollars.” Asked specifically for details on Goldman’s net position on the Timberwolf deal, Goldman Spokesman Michael DuVally declined to comment. But the firm did short about 35 percent of the security, according to an April report by the Senate’s Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations that details Goldman’s development of the now infamous Timberwolf securities , a bet that would reap Goldman significant gains. And the firm had been shorting the housing market long before selling Basis the two mortgage-backed securities. By February 2007, it had a $10 billion net short position on the housing market, according to the Senate report. Lewis said that Goldman lost money on the Timberwolf securities only because they eventually were unable to find customers. And Goldman’s bet on the failure of the securities suggests, Lewis said, the firm had designed the securities to fail. Goldman sought to sell the Timberwolf security at inflated prices as quickly as possible, the Senate report suggested, because they knew that the vehicle’s assets would plummet in value as the housing market crumbled. And just as Goldman promised Basis that the Timberwolf mortgage-backed security would provide a 60 percent return on the investment, according to the report, a Goldman executive privately called the investment “one shitty deal.” The Senate report also found that Goldman didn’t disclose the poor performance of the Point Pleasant vehicle, which it had sold to Basis a few months before the Timberwolf deal, so that it could successfully peddle the Timberwolf securities to the Australian firm. According to the Senate report, Goldman sold Timberwolf to Basis at significantly higher prices than they were internally valuing the securities. Soon after selling the securities, Goldman demanded collateral from Basis several times in order to cover for the securities’ plummeting price. The Basis Fund filed a similar suit against Goldman in June 2010, but a U.S. district court dismissed the suit in July since the Australian hedge fund was not able to prove that its purchases from Goldman were made in the United States. Basis filed its lawsuit on Thursday to the New York County Supreme Court, rather than in the federal court system, in order to sidestep that complaint. Basis lost $67 million in its dealings with Goldman Sachs in 2007, according to Lewis: Eleven million dollars from a $12 million investment in Point Pleasant and another $56 million out of a subsequent $81 million investment in Timberwolf. The hedge fund is suing for an additional $1 billion in punitive damages, because they say Goldman practiced systemic fraud as it tried to unload $1 billion in Timberwolf on unsuspecting customers. Lewis said that Basis plans to use the discovery process in order to dig up more information about Goldman’s development and marketing of the Point Pleasant and Timberwolf securities. They said they plan to look at internal emails; investigate Goldman’s dealings with Greywolf, a firm with Goldman ties that helped selected Timberwolf’s underlying assets; probe the ratings agencies that stamped Timberwolf with a AAA rating; and ask Goldman executives to testify in court. In the end, Lewis said, Goldman failed to fulfill its role as an underwriter, and instead opted to act as a market-maker. “They were giving different prices based on what would make them the most money,” Lewis said. “Goldman had information that we didn’t have. We asked the right questions, and [as an underwriter] you can’t lie when you’re asked a direct question.” Read the lawsuit:

Read the full article →

Appeals Court Overturns Key Cape Wind Clearance

October 29, 2011

BOSTON — A federal appeals court on Friday overturned the Federal Aviation Administration’s ruling that the array of turbines proposed for the Cape Wind project don’t pose a danger for local air traffic, possibly further delaying the wind farm proposed a decade ago. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia said the FAA misread its own rules when assessing Cape Wind, which aims to be the nation’s first offshore wind farm. The court said the FAA did not adequately determine whether Cape Wind’s 130 turbines – each 440-feet tall – would pose a danger to pilots relying on sight rather than the plane’s instruments. The court vacated the government’s “no hazard” finding and sent the case back to the FAA, agreeing with plaintiffs that “the FAA did misread its regulations.” The project has faced relentless opposition since it was first proposed in 2001 for Nantucket Sound, off Massachusetts. Critics say its power would be too costly and the wind farm will spoil beautiful vistas, while posing environmental and navigational threats. The court ruling came in an appeal of the FAA finding by the town of Barnstable and the Alliance to Protect Nantucket Sound. The decision could mean further delays for the $2.6 billion project. FAA spokesman Jim Peters said the agency was reviewing the court decision. He said the FAA does not know yet whether it will have to start over its review of Cape Wind. Audra Parker of the Alliance to Protect Nantucket Sound suggested the decision could sink the project. She said a significant delay could make it impossible for Cape Wind to attract needed investors, “a key step toward Cape Wind’s ultimate failure.” A lawyer for Barnstable, Eric Pilsk, said the FAA took 2 1/2 years to return a new finding in a similar case in Nevada that his firm handled. But Cape Wind spokesman Mark Rodgers said the ruling won’t affect the project schedule, which calls for producing power by 2014. He said the project needed a renewed hazard determination from FAA within coming months anyway. The suit is just another delay tactic by project critics, he added. “The FAA has reviewed Cape Wind for eight years and repeatedly determined that Cape Wind did not pose a hazard to air navigation,” he said. “The essence of today’s court ruling is that the FAA needs to better explain its Determination of No Hazard ruling.” Bill Short, a consultant working the renewable energy industry, said the ruling was a blow to Cape Wind, but the project can likely withstand any delay because it already has a buyer for half its power under very favorable terms. “(It’s like) driving down the road and you’ve hit one hellacious, enormous pothole and it has given you a flat tire. That’s what this is like (for Cape Wind),” he said. “As opposed to you’re driving down the road and your car goes into a sinkhole and you don’t come out.” Cape Wind backers say the costs for the project are worth the numerous benefits, including kicking off a new clean energy industry, while lowering carbon emissions and reducing dependence on foreign oil. Last year, Cape Wind sold half its projected power output to the utility National Grid, after the project became the first U.S. offshore wind farm to win a lease from the U.S. Department of the Interior. But it has struggled to find a buyer for the other half of its electricity. Without one, it likely can’t attract financing to fully build out the project. It could move ahead with a smaller project, but that would raise the price of its power and make it less economical to build. In its ruling Friday, the court said the FAA made its initial finding of “no hazard” after inadequate analysis, basing it solely on the fact Cape Wind’s turbines aren’t 500 feet tall – the threshold for when turbines become a concern to pilots flying primarily by sight, not instruments, under “visual flight rules.” The court said the FAA’s handbook indicates the turbine height is just one possible factor the FAA must consider, including how Cape Wind would affect pilots flying by visual flight rules. It said there were hundreds of such flights in the area over a three-month span and cited testimony from some local pilots worried about colliding with the turbines in the frequently foggy and rough weather over Nantucket Sound. “The FAA might ultimately find the risk of these dangers to be modest,” the ruling read, “but we cannot meaningfully review any such prediction because the FAA cut the process short in reliance on a misreading of its handbook and, thus, as far as we can tell, never calculated the risks in the first place.”

Read the full article →

Akito Yoshikane: L.A. Car Wash Workers Sign Industry’s First Union Contract

October 28, 2011

Thirty Southern California car wash workers have become the first in the business to sign a union contract — and organizers are hoping more will follow suit. The CLEAN Carwash Campaign announced on Tuesday that employees at the Bonus Car Wash in Santa Monica signed a two-year agreement that will improve work conditions in an industry with a history of labor violations. It is the first contract won by CLEAN, which stands for the Community Labor Environmental Action Network. “We’re really excited to finally have a union car wash in L.A. County where people can go and get their cars washed with a clean conscience,” Chloe Osmer, acting director of the CLEAN campaign, told In These Times. According to the contract, which the AFL-CIO helped secure, workers at Bonus Car Wash will see a 2 percent wage increase. In addition to health and safety measures, the contract prohibits the employer from firing workers without just cause or discharging those who voice safety hazard concerns. There is also a grievance and arbitration procedure to settle disputes. “We are looking forward to a partnership with the United Steelworkers that will make our business stronger and improve the opportunities and job satisfaction for all of our employees,” Mike Watson, general manager of Bonus Car Wash, said in a statement . The campaign said the owner has committed to re-opening another car wash in Venice that closed last December. Workers there also have union recognition and a contract, although the owner does not currently own the property. The United Steelworkers union represents the workers, a sign of organizing efforts in nontraditional areas discussed by Mike Elk in his recent Working In These Times piece . In August, workers at Bonus and Marina Car Wash in Venice, both of which are owned by the same family, recognized the union. A separate mobile car wash with seven employees had done the same weeks earlier. Robert LaVenture, USW director of the district that oversaw the campaign, said the employees in the industry were being treated like workers in a third-world country. He added that helping the car wash workers was “the right thing to do.” “It really shows that the union is more than a dues collection group that we sometimes have our enemies tell us we are. It’s really a social justice [issue],” LaVenture said. The contract is a significant step for the workers in a city where car washing is extremely popular. Los Angeles has the highest car density in the country and boasts the most car washes of any large city. The 430 establishments also generate big business. Prices for washes can range from as little as $5 to $200 for full-service cleaning. Southern California car washes profit an average $1 million per year, according to a 2008 CLEAN report . Yet the employees, many of them immigrants, often worked 10 hour days, six days a week while enduring environmental and health hazards. Employers reportedly flout minimum wage laws, leaving many of the city county’s 10,000 car wash workers to take home just $30-$40 a day. The campaign credits part of its success to gaining public support. Car wash workers began organizing committees in 2008, holding numerous presentations to community groups and congregations around Los Angeles to win over enough support. Osmer said workers have already noticed a change in the workplace: We’ve heard workers at Bonus Car Wash have told us in terms of how they’re treated by management is night and day. I think the biggest thing for them is that they feel like their work is respected. They don’t have somebody standing over their shoulder, telling them to hurry up; you can’t take a break or drink water; you can’t eat lunch. They’re actually allowed to do their jobs. The owners are following the law now. Osmer added that the momentum has given hope to other car wash workers looking to improve their work conditions. “We encourage the other car washes in Santa Monica to step up to the plate and raise standards, and allow their workers to unionize as well,” he said. One focus may be to encourage public agencies to have their fleets washed at venues with a commitment to uphold workers’ rights such as at Bonus. USW’s LaVenture also added that the focus will remain on organizing workers in California, but he did not rule out national efforts. “If the call is there, and we see it happening, you can believe the USW and the AFL-CIO will be participating in that,” he said. (This article originally appeared on Working In These Times.)

Read the full article →

Businessman Robert Pritzker Dead At 85

October 28, 2011

CHICAGO — Businessman Robert Pritzker, who led a global industrial conglomerate and whose family founded the Hyatt chain of hotels, has died. He was 85. Pritzker died Thursday evening in a Chicago nursing facility after suffering from Parkinson’s disease, his executive assistant Becky Spooner said Friday. Pritzker founded and was chairman and president of the Marmon Group, an international conglomerate of manufacturing and service companies. His business acumen helped Marmon Group revenues grow into the billions of dollars and through hundreds of acquisitions over 50 years, company officials said. The company was sold to Berkshire Hathaway in 2008. In 2002, at age 76, Pritzker acquired several caster, medical device and hardware companies to form Colson Associates. Pritzker was the brother of Jay Pritzker, who was founder and chairman of the Hyatt Hotel chain and among the richest people in the United States when he died in 1999 in Chicago. Pritzker was born in Chicago on June 30, 1926. He graduated from the Illinois Institute of Technology with an industrial engineering degree in 1946 and later became chairman of the school’s board of trustees. The school now has a Pritzker Institute for Medical Engineering. Throughout his career Pritzker taught management and engineering courses at IIT, the University of Chicago and Oxford University. He also was chairman of the National Association of Manufacturers and worked with the National Academy of Engineering. Pritzker is survived by his wife, Mayari, five children, 10 grandchildren and two great-grandchildren.

Read the full article →

Occupy Wall Street Has Raised $450,000, Spent Just Over $50,000

October 28, 2011

ALBANY, N.Y. — The first financial report of the Occupy Wall Street demonstration in New York City shows protesters have raised more than $454,000 and have spent slightly more than $50,000 in the movement’s first five weeks, a person close to the movement said Friday. The financial report, given to The Associated Press by the person, was to be released Friday evening in Manhattan’s Zuccotti Park, where the protesters have an encampment. The person spoke on the condition of anonymity because the spreadsheet analysis hadn’t been released. The demonstrators are providing reporters daily updates showing more than $500,000 has been donated, but this is the first fiscal report of the Occupy Wall Street movement and part of its move to provide greater transparency. The loosely assembled group’s spreadsheet shows most of the spending is for food, clothing, laundry, medical supplies and treatment, Internet services, cameras and telephone and computer expenses. Park expenses including sanitation have cost more than $1,100, according to the report. “These statements will be released regularly, and open meetings will be held by members of the general assembly to speak with finance,” the report states. “We’re small potatoes financially, but we’re going to make public all of what we do. This effort isn’t about money. We’ve received very little, even as we grow enormously around the world.” The report includes: _Income is broken down by $333,199 from total public donations and $121,237 from park donations. _Comfort expenses totaled $20,407, the largest expense. That was spent on clothing, laundry and sleeping material costs. _Communications expenses totaled $18,985, which includes “computer, WiFi hotspots, livestream cameras, supplies, telephone, video and audio expenses, associated with Media Working Group, LiveStream, and related.” The Occupy Wall Street movement began Sept. 17 with a small group of activists and has swelled to include several thousand people at times, from many walks of life, inspiring similar demonstrations across the country. The protesters’ demands are amorphous, but they are united in blaming Wall Street and corporate interests for the economic pain they say all but the wealthiest Americans have endured since the financial meltdown.

Read the full article →

David Kirby: Green Energy, Jobs and Minority Businesses: Wall Street Is Paying Attention

October 28, 2011

Last week in New York, for the first time ever in the same room, Fortune 500 Corporations, some 200 minority owned small businesses and more than 40 panel experts gathered to discuss ways to create jobs, help the environment, reduce dependency on foreign oil and assist multi-ethnic businesses to bring economic development to the country’s hardest hit communities. The all-day “Sustainability Summit” was presented by the New York & New Jersey Minority Supplier Development Council . The Summit was created to identify U.S.-based innovative minority small businesses in the cleantech and greentech world and provide them access to capital strategic partnering with large corporations. The Summit’s Founding Director is Kevin V.G. Wells, General Counsel and Director of Minority Business Services to The Council, an organization that certifies minority business enterprises for Fortune 500 corporations. Here is what he had to say about the conference: Q: What was the main achievement of this gathering? A: At the Summit, the small business survival “three C’s mantra” — Capital, Competency, Capacity — was immediately thrust into the same room with the Fortune 500 sustainability “three P’s principle” — People, Planet, Productivity. The energy within and across sectors was unprecedented. Contacts and contracts were the topics of many discussions. The uniqueness of this comprehensive industry-wide sustainability conference was its laser focus on exploring and resolving the sustainability concerns of both a large multi-ethnic supplier base and purchasing corporations. Q: What type of corporations took part? A: To begin with, Marsh & McLennan Companies Chief Sustainability Officer, Elizabeth Barry, took an active role at the Summit to show the importance of merging sustainability practices with supplier diversity sourcing efforts. Ms. Barry led the charge along with presenting companies Citi, Colgate-Palmolive, BKW Transformation Group, Ernst & Young, Johnson & Johnson, Turner Construction, Bank of America, Prudential, Wyndham Worldwide and United Water. The honored guest was world-renowned Jerome Ringo, Executive Director of International Business for BARD Holding Inc., who appeared in the documentary, An Inconvenient Truth . Some of the panels included discussions on alternative energy development and energy efficiency, corporate compliance reporting, green certifications, Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED), and print versus digital media. Q: And minority owned businesses? A: There were many leaders from this growing sector of the economy, including Bard Holding Inc., a U.S. based company led by Asian-Indian CEO Surajit Khanna, which produces green algae as a viable alternative source to petroleum-based fuels and employs people in the local communities surrounding his various plants across the country. Another good example would be MPGlobal Connect Inc., an organic tea company, helmed by Monaqui Porter, an African-American woman, which employs local villages in Sri Lanka to produce the tea. She plans to do replicate a similar production model in the Bronx. Q: What else came out of the summit that minority owned businesses and Fortune 500 companies should know? A: Showcasing innovative multi-ethnic vendors in New York and New Jersey had tremendous value. Equally important was the Summit’s education of the urban community on sustainability basics and how to incorporate green business practices to make a difference, be competitive and remain viable. The Summit uncovered small businesses showcasing their best practices in the area of job creation to a corporate audience with far reaching supply chains. Attending corporations were astonished at how some of these multi-ethnic companies had a direct impact on job creation – both here and abroad. Q: How can green energy help bring economic opportunity to minority communities? A: We’ve yet to see a big surge in job growth and the populations hardest hit throughout the United States are minority communities. Political debate rages as to whether small business has been disproportionately unaided by big government largesse with its purported emphasis on alternative energy. However, there is no debate. Jobs are created by small business owners. Solutions are sought, but the phrase “sustainability practices” is often bandied about as a potential panacea for job creation without direction. The harsh reality is that most greentech multicultural companies do not have a clear path to showcase their products or services. They are often overshadowed by larger companies with established funding and business connections. At the Summit, small green companies gained direct access to VCs, high level executives, VPs and managers from some of the world’s largest companies seeking and sourcing for their sustainability business platforms. Q: What should happen next? Major corporations need to be able to identify and qualify those existing green companies in all industries. However, their objective must be clear. Corporations cannot rest their laurels solely on recording isolated humanitarian acts in their reporting. Altruism equals neither profit nor productivity. These sustainability compliance reports must reflect a corporation’s aggressive sourcing of innovative multi-ethnic small businesses that empower its surrounding local communities with jobs. Small companies unfamiliar with sustainability practices also need to partner with innovative companies. Further, the commercial sector cannot solely bear the brunt of economic reform. Government must also play an active role in disseminating green practices to urban small businesses. That’s why we had representatives from the Departments of Commerce and Energy present their procurement objectives to our small business attendees. Q: Any other thoughts? A: Attendees told me that they left the Summit wanting more; and they are already looking into methods on how to utilize both multi-ethnic vendors and innovative sustainability practices into their operations. The overall positive response to the Summit will help drive the next generation discussions on creating a network of innovative diverse suppliers and Fortune 500 Corporations to stimulate the economy through contracts that drive job creation. This Summit was an invitation and challenge to all enterprises to create sustainable partnerships and stimulate U.S. economic growth, a wider paradigm shift is sure to follow. It’s happening now.

Read the full article →

Midwest Occupy Wall Street Protesters Seek To Highlight Foreclosure Mess

October 28, 2011

As the Occupy Wall Street movement enters its seventh week of protest against income inequality, some Midwestern Occupiers are zeroing in on housing issues affecting their communities. Occupy Minneapolis successfully pressured U.S. Bank this week to postpone a Twin Cities woman’s eviction . Now they’re planning “Operation F,” a campaign pushing for a foreclosure moratorium by occupying foreclosed homes. “What we started to do was to make preparations, digging in and taking the occupations to peoples’ homes,” said Ben Egerman, a protester at Occupy Minneapolis. The protesters will go to houses where the homeowners face eviction and ‘occupy’ the homes to highlight the ongoing mortgage mess. And in Iowa, Occupy activists met Thursday with state Attorney General Tom Miller, who is leading a nationwide investigation of bad faith foreclosure dealings by big banks, to voice their concerns. Homeowner advocates fear the attorneys general will reach a settlement that is not tough enough on banks, despite the potential for it being the largest multi-state settlement since the agreement with tobacco companies in 1998 . “I’m still not sure if the settlement committee is going to require the banks pay anywhere near as much as they should, but that’s a hard number to get your arm around,” Ed Fallon said after he left the meeting with Miller and his staff. Fallon, a onetime gubernatorial candidate, was a state legislator for more than a decade. Now he’s active with Occupy Des Moines . When Fallon first proposed an ad hoc “Attorney General Bank Settlement Committee” at an the group’s General Assembly, the protest’s governing body, activists worried the settlement would be too small compared with the amount of abuse suffered by homeowners. But they felt since their Attorney General was leading the case, they had a shot at national influence. Some of the protesters involved with Occupy Des Moines said they were on hand when Miller said last December that he ” would put people in jail ” as a result of the investigation. They said they worried Miller wouldn’t follow through thanks in part to increased campaign contributions from the financial sector he’s brought in since taking the helm of the investigation. But Fallon said he left this week’s meeting feeling a little more at ease that the investigation would not be the be-all-end-all of the mortgage crisis. “We are focused on homeowners, not investors,” Geoff Greenwood, communications director for Miller, told HuffPost on Friday. “This case is about foreclosure and servicing issues, including robo-signing, and we do intend to leave the door open for attorneys general and others to pursue issues beyond the scope of this settlement. This case will not address everything connected with the housing crisis. There are many other pieces.” Twin Cities resident Ruth Murman connected with Occupy Minneapolis, and by Wednesday she was thanking them at a rally outside of downtown Minneapolis banks for helping push back on her eviction, according to the Star Tribune . Murman was trying to get an extension on her eviction by U.S. Bank. She had financial trouble when economy tanked and her business, day care and convalescence center for pets, lost money. Egerman said Murman’s case energized their members. And after hearing about Murman’s story, he said, dozens more people facing evictions and foreclosure asked them for help. “Members were potentially interested in this and there’s no question people were incredibly interested in helping people as much as possible,” he said. Egerman said they’re trying to help people who have been “screwed over by a bank” and are being kicked out of their homes. In the case of Murman’s eviction, Egerman said it showed the small concrete victories they could win as Occupy Minneapolis. While in Iowa, Fallon said “Our primary goal to make Wall Street pay,” adding with caution: “It looks like Wall Street is going to pay.”

Read the full article →

Marian Wright Edelman: Just Say No to Corporate Greed

October 28, 2011

Repatriation . It’s a word many schoolchildren probably haven’t yet learned to define or even seen very often outside of spelling bees. But when it comes to corporate taxes, repatriation is the cornerstone of an idea that has the potential to severely hurt millions of children and parents and widen the already historic and unconscionable gap between the rich and the poor. In its simplest definition, repatriation is bringing something back to its country of origin—returning it back home. One of the solutions to the jobs crisis being proposed by some of our Congressional leaders and lobbied for aggressively by some of the country’s richest corporations is a rehash of an old experiment: enacting a repatriation tax holiday that would temporarily allow U.S.-based multinational companies to bring home profits they currently hold overseas at a 5.25 percent tax rate, instead of the usual 35 percent corporate tax rate. Under current tax law, multinational companies generally pay no U.S. corporate taxes on foreign income until those profits are brought back to the U.S. As the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP) explains, “This effectively allows such firms to defer payment of the U.S. corporate income tax on their overseas profits indefinitely , even though they may obtain an immediate tax deduction for many expenses incurred in supporting the same overseas investments. This can produce a negative U.S. corporate income tax—that is, a net government subsidy—for overseas operations. In addition to causing the federal government to lose tax revenue, this structure gives multinationals a significant incentive to shift economic activity—as well as their reported profits—overseas.” The argument for the repatriation holiday is that giving corporations a huge incentive to bring profits back right now—in the form of an enormous tax break—would bring billions of dollars back to the U.S. economy that would be reinvested and provide a big stimulus to our economy. Corporate proponents and their Congressional bullies argue this will create desperately needed jobs. But the last time this was tried, under a 2004 Bush Administration plan, it didn’t work out that way. Instead, as CBPP points out, “The evidence shows that firms mostly used the repatriated earnings not to invest in U.S. jobs or growth but for purposes that Congress sought to prohibit, such as repurchasing their own stock and paying bigger dividends to their shareholders. Moreover, many firms actually laid off large numbers of U.S. workers even as they reaped multi-billion-dollar benefits from the tax holiday and passed them on to shareholders.” Many economists and scholars believe that if corporations get their way and get another repatriation holiday, history will repeat itself—and once again the corporations and their shareholders, not American workers, families, and children, will be the only winners. The nonpartisan congressional Joint Committee on Taxation has estimated the holiday would cost the federal government about $80 billion over ten years in lost revenue. The Economic Policy Institute’s Andrew Fieldhouse puts it this way: “While there are numerous job creation proposals that would meaningfully lower unemployment, some lawmakers are pushing counterproductive policies disguised as job creation packages. The proposed repeat of the corporate tax repatriation holiday is one such wolf in sheep’s clothing.” When the nation is already facing a jobs crisis and many Congressional leaders are threatening to slash nutrition, child care, and other safety net programs children and families rely on as a means of balancing the budget, revisiting a failed idea instead of coming up with real solutions and real jobs is a threat children and families and our country cannot afford. As the Occupy Wall Street protestors are shouting, let’s “just say no to corporate greed” and to Congresspeople who continue to raid from the poor and children to curry favor and campaign contributions from the rich.

Read the full article →

Private College Students Arrive At Zuccotti Park To Air Complaints

October 28, 2011

NEW YORK — Since graduating from Ithaca College in May, Nathan Grant has searched high and low for steady work. After spending the summer renting kayaks at a local campground, Grant moved back in with his parents in Little Egg Harbor, N.J. In mid-September, Grant first read about Occupy Wall Street online. He said he felt a deep connection to the movement early on, motivated to join it not only because of his struggle to find a job, but also because of the $90,000 in student loan debt that now hangs like an albatross around his neck. A little over a week ago, Grant, 22, moved into lower Manhattan’s Zuccotti Park. He has yet to return home. “I got a degree so I wouldn’t be in this position,” said Grant, who has worn the same gray beanie and gray hoodie all week long. His student loans are currently in deferment, though interest continues to accrue. “Like a lot of the people now living in this park, I’ve had the toughest time finding work.” Private college students and recent graduates living in the New York area have gravitated toward Zuccotti Park to join a community where they feel comfortable airing their frustrations and making their demands known. For students attending private colleges, fears about being able to finance their costly degrees are a particular burden. An annual study released earlier this week by the College Board found that average costs at private colleges have continued to climb . The College Board reported that tuition and fees at private colleges had risen 4.5 percent to $28,500 a year. Many college students have flocked to the Occupy Wall Street movement in recent weeks, citing rising amounts of student loan debt and increasing rates of joblessness . Nationwide, an estimated 150 campuses have staged walkouts — with Occupy Colleges, a student-led grassroots coalition, planning additional teach-ins during the middle of next week . Nate Barchus, a 23-year-old recent graduate of the Rhode Island School of Design, counts himself among the “overeducated and underemployed.” Barchus, who stood sweeping the Occupy Wall Street library early Friday morning, is about $25,000 in debt. Earlier this fall, he first heard about the protests on Facebook and soon arrived in Manhattan, where he had hoped to find work. “I came here for a job search and was so demoralized by the lack of meaningful jobs that I figured this was a more valuable use of my time,” said Barchus, who, despite the frigid weekend forecast, plans to remain camped out in the park indefinitely. Last weekend, Sara Bachman paid a three-day visit to Zuccotti Park during her fall break at Middlebury College. Bachman, a 20-year-old environmental studies and religion major, grew up near Portland, Maine, in an upper-middle-class home. Her mother is a school nurse and her father is an emergency room physician. Come graduation day, Bachman said she faces between $30,000 and $40,000 in student loan debt. While her school participated in a campus-wide solidarity protest a few weeks back, Bachman wanted to see Occupy Wall Street with her own eyes. Alongside two other Middlebury students, Bachman plopped her backpack and sleeping bag down on an unoccupied stretch of concrete in Zuccotti Park and prepared to spend Saturday night. Though Bachman returned to Vermont in time for Wednesday’s classes, she said the sense of community and passion she discovered among the fellow protesters not only filled her with a sense of hopefulness about the future, but is likely to fuel her return later this year. When Grant heard about Occupy Wall Street, he also felt compelled to experience it firsthand. By his own admission, Grant grew up poor. He’s the first person in his family to graduate from college. His mother looks after an elderly woman and his father wraps meat at a local grocery store. Grant made the hour-and-a-half trip into Manhattan in the back of a van owned by his brother’s boss. Though he’d only visited Manhattan two or three times before, he walked from Pennsylvania Station on 34th Street to Zuccotti Park. Since Grant initially planned to stay only a week, he brought along just a few changes of clothes, some cologne, deodorant, toothpaste, a toothbrush and a tent. The first night, he said he nearly froze to death without a sleeping bag. In order to last the winter, Grant has realized he’ll have to acquire some heavy-duty outdoor gear. So far, Grant said he has yet to meet many other recent graduates or current students living in the park. “Everyone says this a youth movement, but I don’t see that many youth,” said Grant, who eventually wants to go back to school to become an elementary school teacher but refuses to take on more debt until he’s paid off his undergraduate loans. “But where is everyone?”

Read the full article →

Andy Mannle: Is Nuclear Energy a Fuel with a Future?

October 28, 2011

Nuclear energy has always been a controversial issue. With the meltdown at the Fukushima Daiichi plant this spring, increased concerns about climate change, and a global debate over the future of energy, this year is no exception. Nuclear advocates argue that it is a low-carbon alternative to fossil fuels that can provide more baseload power than renewables. Opponents respond that even if you resolve daunting radioactive waste, environmental risk and security issues, exorbitant construction costs remain. Studies by the California Energy Commission ( PDF ) and Mark Cooper ( PDF ), Senior Fellow at Yale University’s Institute for Energy and the Environment, have shown that the costs of building future nuclear capacity are even higher. Despite buzz about a “nuclear renaissance,” the industry has had trouble attracting private investment, and relies almost exclusively on government subsidies and support. By contrast, the private renewables market has soared over the last several years, with the UN Environment Programme reporting that global investments in green energy topped $211 billion in 2010, up 32 percent from 2009, and a staggering 540 percent since 2004. Meanwhile in the first quarter of 2011, renewable energy production in the U.S. surpassed nuclear for the first time. All signals point to significant growth in the solar and renewables markets over the next decade, while nuclear production has remained flat for years. If new nuclear plants cannot compete on either cost or scale in today’s private market, enormous government support will be required simply to maintain, let alone expand, nuclear capacity in the future. However, both the Japanese and German governments are responding to the Fukushima disaster by increasing their emphasis on renewables instead of nuclear. The Japanese just established a Feed-In Tariff to expand renewables, with a recent poll showing 77 percent supporting a nuclear phase out. The Germans are actively considering phasing out their nuclear program entirely. Not all countries are halting their nuclear plans, however. In the fast-developing BRIC nations (Brazil, Russia, India and China) the IAEA reports as of early August 2011, 45 new nuclear plants are under construction in BRIC nations. 27 are in China, followed by Russia (11), India (6), and Brazil (1). But the nuclear industry needs to do more than build a few plants a year to be a true low-carbon alternative to fossil fuels. A hard look at the science of reducing atmospheric carbon to 350ppm shows why. To get the world off coal, which produces roughly half of the world’s power, would require 7-8 terawatts of energy. One nuclear power plant yields a gigawatt of power, meaning 8000 nuclear power plants would be needed to produce 8 terawatts. To do this by 2050, 200 plants would need to be built a year, which is roughly one every 1.5 days. Since nuclear plants only have a lifespan of 50 years, by the time the required amount is built, early plants would have to start being decommissioned. After that, new plants would need to keep being built at the same pace just to replace retiring ones. So if the world goes nuclear, supplying half the power we need would require building a new plant every other day forever. Even if this rate of growth were feasible, it is clearly unsustainable. Of course, no single strategy is going to wean us off coal in several decades. We will need a combination of carbon reduction strategies — what Princeton researchers Robert Socolow and Stephen Pacala call ” stabilization wedges ” that each reduce a billion tons a year for the next 50 years. The “wedges” include efficiency, renewables, carbon sequestration, reforestation, and replacing coal plants with natural gas. But even for nuclear to generate a single wedge would require tripling our current nuclear capacity. The reality is global CO2 emissions are rising, not falling. And we can’t build enough nuclear alone to stop them. As such, nuclear’s benefits as a low-carbon alternative would only materialize in the context of a global war on carbon. Absent that, nuclear becomes just another low-carbon energy source competing on the open market with cleaner renewables and cheaper natural gas. Ironically, the current slow growth of nuclear and the possibility of an actual nuclear retreat after Fukushima could mean an acceleration in our rising CO2 emissions, cautions the International Energy Agency. So we cannot build enough nuclear to solve our CO2 problem in the long term, but if we don’t build more, it may get worse in the near term. Powerful industry lobbies in the U.S. and elsewhere will continue to support nuclear as a fuel source, of course, but even the industry recognizes that a major expansion is unlikely. Speaking at an American Nuclear Society conference in August 2011, John Rowe, CEO of Exelon, the country’s largest nuclear utility said 3 of the 4 conditions necessary for expanding nuclear cannot be met. While newer designs offer the right technology, Rowe argues that the government has not resolved waste disposal issues. Additionally, there is currently excess generation capacity because the economic recession has slowed energy consumption. While this will likely change as we retire more coal plants and the economy grows, the influx of cheap natural gas from shale has undercut nuclear’s higher prices. Today, nuclear cannot compete on cost with fossil fuels, and cannot compete on quality with renewables. Going forward, renewables offer rapid growth and innovation combined with falling costs, which will make it harder for nuclear to compete in the future. And as fossil fuel prices rise, they will also likely drive up nuclear’s construction costs, offsetting any price advantage there. Without a major breakthrough, it seems safe to say nuclear will never be cheaper than coal or natural gas; nor will it be as safe, clean, and attractive to consumers and investors as renewables. In the end, the most likely option for nuclear energy is neither renaissance nor retreat, but continued slow growth, with heated arguments on all sides. This article originally appeared in the October issue of World Energy Monitor, a newsletter published by the United Nations’ World Energy Forum. The newsletter includes a competing perspective from the World Nuclear Association, and international highlights on nuclear issues. It is currently being hosted at the Energy & Water Institute of NY .

Read the full article →

Charles Gasparino: Jon Corzine’s Lesson for Wall Street Risk Takers

October 28, 2011

Under normal circumstance the travails of a mid-sized brokerage firm like MF Global shouldn’t be receiving this much attention, particularly when reporters have so many drugged-up hippie Wall Street protesters to interview down at Zuccotti Park. But MF Global — which is unlikely to survive through the weekend, at least in its current form — is no ordinary firm and the tale of how it became the latest casualty of mindless risk taking is something that every risk taker on Wall Street could learn from. It begins in March of last year when former Goldman Sachs chairman, Jon Corzine, decided he had enough of New Jersey politics and decided to jump back into the Wall Street game. Times have certainly changed since Corzine was one of the street’s top executives. He left (he was actually booted) from Goldman in 1999 after the firm made a series of bad bets on his watch tied to the money-losing trades of the faltering hedge fund, Long-Term Capital Management. The LTCM fiasco was big enough that it affected every major Wall Street firm and required a government bailout to save the financial system, or so we were told (sound familiar?). But it also occurred in the middle of the technology bubble that showered huge profits on the banks and made Corzine a millionaire 500 million times over. Corzine’s reputation should have been in tatters; by the end of his days at Goldman, Corzine was regarded as a lousy manager, a poor judge of risk and the reason why Goldman had to delay plans to convert from a partnership to become a public company. But he used his winnings to finance a career in New Jersey politics, first being elected as US senator and later as the state’s governor. Meanwhile, the man who booted Corzine from Goldman, Hank Paulson, went on to become Treasury secretary during a period of risk taking unprecedented in modern financial history. And you know how this story ends: The financial crisis of 2007 and 2008, where massive losses tied to housing debt caused the demise of Bear Stearns, Lehman Brothers and nearly every surviving firm before Paulson arranged for the mother of all Wall Street bailouts. With that came a wave of regulation to reduce risk-taking. In many cases, firms simply decided the downside of losing big bucks and going out of business wasn’t worth the occasional big score, so they began to reduce risk on their own. But Corzine was clearly asleep during much of the risk-taking years, not to mention the fallout that occurred after the financial system imploded (If you live in New Jersey and witnessed how badly he ran the state, you’ll know when I mean). When he took over at MF Global, he vowed to run the firm as if the financial crisis didn’t happen. First he threw out the playbook developed by his predecessor Bernie Dan, who was rebuilding MF Global after a trading scandal by cracking down on risk. Under Dan, MF Global would return to its roots as a broker, mainly for commodities, earning fees to execute business on behalf of others. The firm was achieving some degree of success as well. Its balance sheet was clean and some on Wall Street said it was poised to begin earning modest profits. But put a clean balance sheet in the hands of someone who saw the financial crisis as nothing more than a passing storm, and you know what happens. Within minutes of taking the job Corzine began boasting that he was building a mini-Goldman, as he sought to emulate Goldman’s business model of taking enormous bets in various markets. There was just one problem with that strategy: it’s prone to error. Even the best traders like those at Goldman screw up, as the events of 2007 and 2008 demonstrate. Corzine isn’t close to being among the street’s best traders. so he didn’t waste any time screwing up. Less than a year after taking the job, he and his traders made a calculated bet that Europe wasn’t the basket case that we now know it truly is. His traders bought more than $6 billion sovereign debt most of it issued by Italy and Spain, the two countries that are now replacing Greece in the likely to default department. With that, Jon Corzine gambled away MF Global, which is now in a mad dash to sell parts of itself while it moves closer to liquidation, Lehman style. Hundreds of people will likely lose their jobs in the aftermath, which is sad since most have nothing to do with the part of the firm that’s causing the problems. Meanwhile, anyone dumb enough to buy Corzine’s plan to remake MF Global into Goldman Sachs will lose most if not all of their investment, though analysts tell me those investors want blood and will likely sue Corzine and MF Global when the dust begins to clear next week. It seems that offering documents for a bond deal issued this summer by the firm didn’t really mention the size and scope of the MF Global’s sovereign debt holdings, so investors will likely make the case that they were misled into think Corzine was running a firm with a clean balance sheet, even if it was neck-deep in the Euro morass. There is some good news to report: MF Global won’t be bailed out by the federal government, and will likely fail. Unlike Corzine’s old firm, MF Global isn’t big enough to be “systemically important” to the nation’s economy and the financial system And when it does fail, it will finally end the Wall Street career of Jon Corzine, and finally prove that there are consequences to idiotic risk taking.

Read the full article →

Stephen F. Edwards Joins Cosi, Inc. Board of Directors

October 28, 2011

DEERFIELD, IL–(Marketwire – Oct 28, 2011) – Cosi, Inc. ( NASDAQ : COSI ), the premium convenience restaurant company, today announced the appointment of Stephen F. Edwards to the company’s Board of Directors on October 24, 2011.

Read the full article →

BofA Likely To Alter Rules For Debit Card Fees After Criticism

October 28, 2011

(Rick Rothacker) – Bank of America Corp, after receiving heavy public criticism for a planned $5 per-month debit card fee, is likely to give customers more ways to avoid the fee, a person familiar with the bank’s plans said Friday. The second largest U.S. bank is likely to allow many customers to avoid the fee by taking measures such as maintaining minimum balances, having paychecks direct deposited, or using Bank of America credit cards, the person said. Under earlier plans, customers might have needed balances totaling $20,000 across all their Bank of America accounts to avoid the fee. Bank of Americas unleashed a firestorm of criticism from customers, consumer advocates and politicians last month when it disclosed plans to charge customers $5 per month for using their debit cards, starting sometime next year. The goal was to make up revenue lost to a law that slashes the fees banks charge retailers when consumers swipe their cards. Some other major banks have quietly pulled back on the charges. After testing a $3 per month fee in two states since February, JPMorgan Chase & Co decided not to charge customers, a person familiar with the situation said on Friday. The test will end next month and will not be extended or expanded, the person added. Wells Fargo & Co started testing a $3 per-month fee in five states on October 14. The bank has not had time to evaluate results and has not made any changes in the program, Wells spokeswoman Lisa Westermann said. Charlotte, North Carolina-based Bank of America is not abandoning the fee now and will likely include it in new account types the bank is testing in three states. The bank plans to roll out these packages nationwide next year. The $5 per-month fee may still remain an option for customers, the person said. The bank has said the purpose of the new account types is to provide customers with upfront pricing, instead of hitting them with penalties after the fact. Customers can pay monthly fees of between $9 and $20, or avoid the charges by keeping minimum balances, using their credit cards or having a minimum amount deposited to their account. While some banks have disclosed plans to apply similar fees, many banks and credit unions decided not to institute the charge and have encouraged customers to switch banks. (Reporting by Rick Rothacker in Charlotte, North Carolina; editing by Andre Grenon) Copyright 2011 Thomson Reuters. Click for Restrictions .

Read the full article →

Halloween’s Eerie Evolution Into An Industry Worth Billions

October 28, 2011

By Alice Hines, AOL Daily Finance Looking for a last-minute costume isn’t too tough these days. In strip malls across the country, temporary Halloween stores have popped up in vacant retail spaces like an orange-spotted rash. But back when Chuck Martinez was growing up in the 1970s, the idea of a store devoted entirely to Halloween was considered kind of crazy, or at best, a silly business plan. Martinez had an unusual job. He worked at a San Diego Sears Roebuck as a company magician, performing at store openings and company meetings. He also helped out at his mom’s magic store. Every Halloween, the pair watched new shoppers flock in, searching for costumes. “We’d do as much business in October as the rest of the year combined,” he recalled. Sensing an opportunity, Martinez told Sears that he wanted to open a temporary Halloween store within its San Diego store. “Everyone thought it was crazy. But I felt very strongly it could work.” To get the hefty deposit that Sears required, Martinez convinced his mom to take out a mortgage on her house. The shop was a hit. And Martinez went on to help Sears (SHLD) open temporary Halloween stores across the country, spending the ’80s developing the Halloween Shop at Sears. He sold the Sears enterprise in 1988 for $6 million — a huge sum back then but just a small slice of 2011 Halloween money. The National Retail Federation estimates Halloween spending will reach $6.86 billion this year. Martinez, who went on to found Disguise Inc., one of the world’s biggest costume makers, is one of a few unlikely, if not accidental, businessmen who fell into Halloween in the 1970s and 1980s and have watched it grow from an indie enterprise to a massive industry. Marc Beige, CEO of Rubie’s Costumes, another large operation, jokes that they are the “Icons of Horror.” Pop-Ups Pop Up Everywhere Temporary Halloween stores have boomed in the years since the Sears experiment, growing in the past 10 years at a faster rate than spending for the holiday. In 1999, chain retailer Spirit Halloween, now owned by Spencer Gifts, operated 63 temporary Halloween stores. This season, it has 970 in the U.S. and Canada. Halloween Express, a Kentucky-based franchise launched in 1990 by a party store entrepreneur, had 130 stores in 2006. Halloween USA, a Michigan-based chain of pop-ups, had 100 stores in the same year. Today, the two have expanded to 300 and 400 pop-ups, respectively. Many more local chains have followed suit. The past five years have been explosive. In Manhattan, Ricky’s NYC, a beauty chain, opened up 30 Halloween pop-ups this year in the greater New York area. In the suburbs, pop-ups are practically ubiquitous. In Akron, Ohio, a city of 200,000 an hour south of Cleveland, there are ten Halloween stores this year, says Debbie Meredith, the owner of Akron Design. “Halloween has become so popular that it’s just about killing itself,” Meredith says. She started her store 31 years ago in her basement, when she was sewing costumes for her friends’ Halloween parties. Her first costume (still available for rental on the company’s website) was a purple grape suit inspired by the 1978 Fruit of the Loom commercial. Stores like Meredith’s that stayed local, while others expanded, are today under siege, encroached upon by big chains like Walmart (WMT) as well as the pop-up stores. “It’s really hard [to compete] when you pay taxes and keep people employed year-round.” She had managed to survive in part by moving sales to the web. Meredith, who is vice president of the National Costumers Association, says that the trade group has seen 20% of the 1,800 year-round costume shops it monitors close since 2006. Ironically, at the nadir of the economic crisis in 2009, when all other stores were suffering, Halloween pop-ups were at their peak, scooping up empty, low-rent space formerly occupied by stores like Circuit City and Linens ‘n’ Things. This year, many of the stores are opening in former Borders locations, though competition for space is now much fiercer, industry insiders say. Adventures and Acquisitions In the 1980s, others caught onto Martinez’s good idea. Big chains like Walmart and Macy’s (M) followed Sears by stocking Halloween goods. Meanwhile, other individuals had been striking gold with Halloween stores in malls, as more and more grown-ups starting dressing up for the holiday. Perhaps the most legendary of all the Halloween stores, however, is New York City’s Halloween Adventure. The huge store, which runs the width of a city block, was launched in 1996 by actor and former Halloween kiosk operator Bruce Goldman and Tony Bianchi, an artist and mask maker. The store was a natural next step for the pair, who had teamed up to create theatrical Halloween pop-ups — “entertainment retail,” as Goldman explained to The New York Times in 1994. On a recent Wednesday, Halloween Adventure was crawling with children, bachelors, students, couples — even rock star Elvis Costello and his son (so a salesperson claimed) were there. Also in attendance: 100 costumed employees, 60 of whom were hired for the season. Bianchi, now 66 and on his 15th Halloween at the location, was running around in a feathered cap helping customers and talking to journalists. While the store is open year-round, Bianchi says Halloween accounts for 60% of business. From his perch, Bianchi has watched the quirky Village celebration transform into an international industry. “The [big] chains realized there was a holiday between Back to School and Christmas,” he says. October is otherwise a dead month for retail, and when a few retailers began to make money, others big and small took notice. Costume manufactures also played a role, creating more elaborate costumes to fill the new stores and feed the burgeoning demand. With the current state of competition in the industry, Bianchi’s lucky to have his prime New York City location and eager East Village clientele. “We’re like the FAO Schwarz of Halloween,” he says. Every year without fail on Oct. 31, shoppers line up around the block to get costumes before the store closes at 10 p.m. Superstore Success Spirit Halloween, acquired by Spencer’s in 1999, was probably the first chain to open a “superstore” of the kind we see today, a 20,000-plus-square-foot box. Spencer Gifts was able to take the concept to a much bigger place when it bought Spirit, notes Martinez. In the 2000s, other chains like Halloween City were acquired by big companies like Amscan. Meanwhile, local businesses, inspired by their success, tried their hands at pop-ups through franchises like Halloween Express or private ventures. According to Bianchi, many of the operators who opened pop-ups in the 2000s were more interested in money than the meaning of the holiday. “I’m connected with the aesthetic of Halloween, the silliness of the holiday from infants to old age,” he says. “Pop-ups tend to be slapped together.” Still, the line separating the originals from the opportunists isn’t always clear. Some “mom and pop” costume stores have become national chains. Other pop-ups are now trying their hands at permanent retail. In addition to Bianchi’s location, Halloween Adventure now operates 26 permanent toy stores, all of which become Halloween stores during the season. But no matter how you look at it, what seemed like an all-you-can eat retail buffet ultimately turned cannibalistic. “Margins are big, and it looks like a no-brainer,” Bianchi says. “Then stores copy each other. You see them all along the highways up and down New Jersey. They wipe each other out.” Business of Fantasy Martinez and some of the other “icons” express regret that so many small costume shops — similar to the one he and his mother once owned — have closed. “I think what happened is Halloween really grew up,” he says. “Those baby boomers took it along with them to celebrate in an adult fashion and to pass on to their kids as a more involved experience.” “Europe has carnival and masquerade,” he says. “This is the closest thing we have to a fall harvest festival.” Meredith also acknowledges that the growth that has hurt her store has been wonderful for consumers. While some of the fantasy and creativity she loved about Halloween has been lost, the holiday is now accessible to more people. Today, anyone can buy a costume for as little as $5, if they don’t mind being a stock character — a vampire, witch, zombie, etc. — or last year’s forgotten superhero hit. Meanwhile, there are still some hardcore Halloweeners and costume fanatics keeping the holiday weird. New York shoppers who don’t find anything in the two neighboring pop-ups on Broadway can still wait in line to dig around Bianchi’s store, or else browse the wealth of costumes available online. This year, Meredith’s surprise hits were 25 homemade hamster masks (made popular by the Kia Soul commercials) that she sold for $75 a pop on eBay. No other manufacturer could produce them fast enough. Check out some photos of Halloween Adventure, courtesy of AOL Daily Finance :

Read the full article →

New Way To Rebel Against Big Banks

October 28, 2011

By Mitch Lipka (Reuters) – If you are looking for a way to rebel against big banks, you could just sit on your couch and scan a few checks. How is that making a statement? Once you can easily scan a check and deposit it, do you really need to stick with a bank just because it has a branch in your neighborhood? The technological advance of smartphone scanning breaks down one of the last barriers to easy bank switching. As the practice spreads, there may be no stopping upstarts from cutting into the deposits of major banks. The idea of switching out of big banks to smaller ones has morphed into its very own day: November 5 is Bank Transfer Day (see www.facebook.com/NovemberFifth). It was launched by Los Angeles art gallery owner Kristen Christian to encourage folks to pull their money from big banks in protest of their policies, from mortgage lending practices to the repayment of TARP funds to a constant array of new fees. “Seriously, who likes going to branches? It’s much more convenient to either mail checks or use cutting-edge mobile deposit technology,” asks former Capital One executive Dan O’Malley, who is now CEO of PerkStreet Financial, one such small financial institution. Mailing checks for deposit to operations like PerkStreet, State Farm Bank, ING Direct or a distant credit union has long been an option, but the growth and acceptance of deposit by phone could be a game-changer for many consumers, O’Malley and others say. USAA Bank has been accepting scanned check deposits for years. It caters to mobile military families but also offers banking services to the general public, “In addition to reducing costs associated with mailing checks, mobile-based remote deposit makes it infinitely more convenient for customers to get money into their online-only accounts at branchless banks,” O’Malley says. Security experts say there is no particular concern to making deposits via a smart phone app. The main issue is being sure to take basic precautions with your phone, says Joseph Steinberg, CEO of the IT firm Green Armor Solutions. “You should have security software on your smartphone. You should have the capabilities to do an anti-malware check,” Steinberg says. Of course, using a phone to deposit a check isn’t exclusive to upstarts. In addition to USAA Bank, which has but a handful of locations, big banks including JPMorgan Chase have since joined in. Brian Ruby of Stratford, Connecticut, uses the Chase app. “It’s very easy: endorse the check, launch the app, snap a couple pictures, confirm the numbers, wait for an email saying it’s good and shred it,” he says. “I don’t get checks very often, and when I would they would sit around for a long time since I seldom visit a branch, so now I’m much quicker on deposits.” Depositing a check by mail is riskier scenario than a deposit by phone app, Steinberg says. Online banking through remote Internet-based financial institutions isn’t new, but is growing with deposit technology. At State Farm Bank, mobile check deposits are up 150 percent since January. Customers using the technology run the age gamut — nearly 45 percent of mobile check deposit customers are 36- to 55-years-old, the company says. In case you’re concerned about the security of your online bank, check to see if your funds will be FDIC insured. State Farm, PerkStreet (through Bancorp Bank) and ING, for example, all are FDIC members. Being a revolutionary is one thing. But doing without that government deposit guarantee? That’s revolting in a different way. The author is a Reuters contributor. The opinions expressed are his own. (Editing by Lauren Young and Beth Gladstone) Copyright 2011 Thomson Reuters. Click for Restrictions .

Read the full article →

White Digital Media Appoints Brian Smith New CEO

October 28, 2011

As CEO, Former Group Managing Director Brian Smith Will Take Over the Day-to-Day Operations Within the White Digital Media Group at Its Headquarter Offices in San Diego, CA

Read the full article →

Medtronic: FDA Panel Rejects Heart Catheter

October 28, 2011

MINNEAPOLIS — Medtronic Inc. says a panel advising the U.S. Food and Drug Administration has concluded that an experimental catheter from the medical device maker poses a potential health risk that outweighs its benefit to patients. The company is asking the FDA to approve the device for atrial fibrillation, which causes the heart’s upper chambers beat rapidly and ineffectively. The catheter uses extreme heat to correct irregular heartbeats. Medtronic said Thursday that the FDA’s Circulatory Systems Devices advisory panel voted against the device. It said a majority of the panel’s members concluded from clinical trial data that there isn’t a reasonable assurance that the catheter is safe to use. The panel’s recommendation isn’t binding, but will be considered by the FDA when it reviews Medtronic’s request to bring the device to market.

Read the full article →

College Costs Are Rising Faster Than Cost Of Living, Medical Expenses (CHART)

October 28, 2011

According to a report from the College Board published earlier this week, college costs are increasing so fast that they are now outpacing cost of living inflation by a significant margin. However, seeing graphically just how much college cost has risen in comparison to the cost of living and even medical expenses is somewhat shocking. Matthew Phillips of Freakonomics just published a disturbing chart contrasting cost of living inflation, medical expenses, and college tuition. (h/t Ezra Klein ) This chart is especially disturbing considering medical costs routinely rise much higher than inflation.

Read the full article →

Alta Mira Recovery Centers Announces New Executive Director

October 28, 2011

SAUSALITO, CA–(Marketwire – Oct 28, 2011) – Alta Mira is pleased to announce that Cherlyne Short Majors, Ph.D. has joined the treatment center as their new Executive Director. A highly accomplished and well respected behavioral healthcare professional, Dr. Majors has over 24 years of experience at prestigious treatment facilities such as the Betty Ford Center, Cirque Lodge, and Charter Behavioral where she held executive-level positions.

Read the full article →

Bunchball Accelerates Gamification Growth and Success IN Q3 2011

October 28, 2011

Company Sees Mainstream Adoption of Gamification to Engage and Motivate Users

Read the full article →

Samantha Parent Walravens: What Happened To The Gen Y Work-Life Revolution?

October 28, 2011

The work-life conflict of my generation — Generation X, or those born between 1965 and 1980 — has been defined by the unrealistic expectations that women, primarily, have placed on themselves to “have it all”: career, marriage, kids, house in the suburbs, etc. Somewhere along the way, “having it all” morphed into “doing it all,” a far cry from the liberation our feminist foremothers fought so hard for. But what of the next generation? I’ve been counting on Generation Y, or the Millenials, as they are called — those born between 1978 and 1995 — to usher in a new workplace model where employees don’t have to be tied to their desks 9 to 5 or slowly climb the corporate ladder of success. After all, these youngins are the iGeneration: tech-savvy, mobile and socially networked. They can complete important work assignments from Starbucks, the playground, hey, even from a hot bubble bath! If anyone can figure out how to gracefully blend work and home life, it’s the Millennials, right? Wrong. According to a new study from British consultancy JBA involving almost 25,000 people across 19 countries, much of the perceived wisdom about Gen Y’s attitude and approach to work, and work-life balance, needs to be radically rethought. While we frequently hear that Gen Yers are beating the drum for new working practices — demanding the freedom to work remotely, make use of the latest “must-have” technologies and communicate with colleagues via social networks rather than face-to-face — the study found that the reality is very different. In fact, younger staff expressed 15 to 20 percent less desire than their older colleagues to choose their time and place of work — they actively seek out every opportunity to be in the office in the closest proximity to their boss. It also found a direct correlation between age and appetite for flexible working. Among older staff, seven out of 10 wanted more choice about their work patterns. But just four out of 10 of their younger colleagues are keen to detach themselves from the office environment. According to Allison Ells, a 28-year-old regional sales manager from New York City, the tough economy may have something to do with her peers’ reluctance to ask for flexible work arrangements. “Many companies today still do not provide the flexibility and support needed to manage both a career and a family,” says Ells, who is engaged and plans to have kids in the next few years. “In this way, it feels that the work-life issues faced by Gen X have not yet been resolved for my generation (Gen Y). Especially in the current economy, where having a job is not to be taken for granted.” What’s more, younger staff placed more emphasis on working longer hours in the office and putting work before family than their older colleagues. Sarah Meager, a 26-year old law student from Boston, looks at her mother’s experience as a cautionary tale. “My mom quit her job as an attorney after having three children,” explains Meager. “She was never able to go back to her legal career at the same level. I don’t plan to stop working for any period of time when I have kids because I know it will put me at a huge disadvantage career-wise.” Disheartening words from a generation that I had hoped would change the discourse of the work-life debate. Another myth busted by the report is that Gen Yers are forever demanding new technologies and access to social networks. If anything, they are reticent to ask for such tools for fear that they might be accused of slacking off on the job. “Listen, these kids are hard workers. They are starting their careers in tough economic times. They have high expectations of where their jobs will lead, but they aren’t afraid to put in some hard labor in the early years,” says Jake Riley, a recruiter for tech jobs in the Silicon Valley. The key message from the survey, according to author John Blackwell, is that for all the talk of technological and social revolutions, some things stay the same. So just like their mothers, Gen Y women may still be stuck between a rock and a hard place for the time being. Yes, they are savvier about what they can realistically expect from the business world, but many still envision a conflict between their dream of having kids and reaching the top of their professions. The question is, what is the world going to do to help them achieve their goals? Samantha Parent Walravens is a freelance journalist and mother of four. She is the author of TORN: True Stories of Kids, Career and the Conflict of Modern Motherhood , which was chosen by The New York Times as its first pick for the Motherlode Book Club.

Read the full article →

Doctors Call New Kansas Abortion Clinic Regulations ‘Irrational’

October 28, 2011

TOPEKA, Kan. — Three doctors who perform abortions in Kansas will challenge new regulations for their clinics even after the rules were revised to placate the physicians, their attorneys said Thursday, arguing that the rules still impose unreasonable and “irrational” requirements. The physicians – Dr. Herbert Hodes, his daughter, Dr. Traci Nauser, and Dr. Ronald Yeomans – already persuaded a federal judge to block the earlier version of the rules. The New York-based Center for Reproductive Rights, which represents Hodes and Nauser, and Cheryl Pilate, who represents Yeomans, both said Thursday that they would sue over the revised regulations. Hodes and Nauser perform abortions and other services at their medical offices in the Kansas City suburb of Overland Park and Yeomans performs abortions at a Kansas City, Kan., clinic. The first version of the rules told providers what drugs and equipment they must stock and set minimum size requirements for procedure and recovery rooms. The department recently revised the rules, paring down the list of drugs and equipment required and dropping specific sizes for rooms. The state published the revised regulations Thursday and they are set to take effect Nov. 14. A federal judge blocked enforcement of the original regulations until a trial of the doctors’ lawsuit. Learning last week that revised regulations would take effect next month, the judge ordered the parties in the lawsuit to analyze the differences between the two sets of rules. “They made some important changes, which is good, but unfortunately, they have left a lot in that is unacceptable,” Bonnie Scott Jones, an attorney for the center, said during a telephone interview. “They’re still extremely burdensome in multiple ways, so they still do need to be challenged.” The revised regulations retain a rule allowing only a physician to dispense drugs, which Jones said would prevent a physician’s assistant from giving over-the-counter pain medication. Also kept was a requirement that providers make all records available for review by the health department, something critics predict will invade patients’ privacy. Pilate also cited a requirement that patients remain in recovery rooms for up to an hour after a procedure, based on how far along their pregnancy was. The original rules specified a two-hour wait, but Pilate said even the revised version is onerous. She said the new rules still have “medically unnecessary restrictions.” Kansas Attorney General Derek Schmidt’s office declined comment. Schmidt is a defendant in the existing lawsuit, as are two county prosecutors in the Kansas City area and the state’s secretary of health and environment. Health department spokeswoman Miranda Steele said the agency had not seen the center’s announcement. “KDHE will move forward as we can legally, however we need to do our jobs within the rule of law,” she added. The health department wrote both sets of regulations under a law enacted this year requiring clinics, hospitals and doctors’ offices performing five or more elective abortions a month to obtain a special, annual license. It was part of a wave of anti-abortion measures enacted this year across the nation, as abortion opponents capitalized on the election of new, sympathetic Republican governors such as Kansas’ Sam Brownback. The original regulations were temporary because the health department skipped a public hearing to get them in place by July 1, which they said the law required. The revised set was published after a public hearing in September. Both Yeomans’ clinic, Aid for Women, and Hodes’ and Nauser’s office failed to obtain a license, saying their buildings would need extensive renovations under the original rules. The third abortion provider in Kansas, a Planned Parenthood clinic, also in Overland Park, received a license. Abortion rights supporters argue the rules are meant to be burdensome enough to discourage doctors and clinics from terminating pregnancies. Abortion opponents argue the rules will protect patients. Mary Kay Culp, executive director of the anti-abortion group Kansans for Life, said the original rules were “reasonable and state of the art,” and abortion providers have no legitimate complaints after their concerns were considered. ___ Online:

Read the full article →

Can This Startup Make Local Search Smarter?

October 28, 2011

In the near future, Internet search engines and social networks will have access to data that will allow users to see in real-time the items sitting on a local store’s shelves or the dishes sizzling in a neighborhood restaurant’s kitchen. But we’re not quite there yet. As it exists today, local search faces a fundamental limitation — that at least one data-focused startup hopes to overcome. “It’s great that we can now quickly find the nearest coffee shop on our mobile phone or look up the opening hours for a nearby shoe repair,” says Rene Reinsberg, the co-founder and CEO of Boston-based Locu . “But what about what that small business has to offer?” The reality of Reinsberg’s rhetorical may not hit you until you consider a hypothetical. Say you’re on a Sunday stroll through a neighborhood in New York’s West Village when you suddenly start craving a bloody mary. But not just any bloody mary will do. You want a homemade one, with clam juice, that is less than $15. So you whip out your phone and Google “bloody mary” plus “West Village” and the search engine spits out a list of local bars and restaurants that serve bloody marys. But the list of blue links that turn up is hardly helpful . By the time you use the search results to retrieve information on pricing and ingredients, having sifted through numerous Yelp reviews, menu platforms and sites of local restaurants and bars, with their clunky online menus, you’re just about ready to settle for a can of tomato juice and a couple nips of vodka from the corner store. Why can’t Google, Facebook or any other local search tool just do the sifting for you and spit out a list of local bloody marys — rather than a list of local businesses — so you can quickly decide which clam-infused cocktail is best for you? The reason is that, behind the scenes, there’s no comprehensive database from which search engines can pull real-time menu data for the millions of restaurants and bars in the United States alone. “We’ve been working on menus for more than two years now,” says Shashi Seth, Yahoo’s senior vice president of search and marketplaces. “This can’t be done by people. You have to do this algorithmically and you have to do the type of indexing, crawling and understanding of elements that search engines employ.” That’s where Locu hopes to step in. “It’s the missing piece in local search,” says Reinsberg, who believes his startup has a solution: Patent-pending technologies that will use machine learning to “create the world’s largest repository of semantically annotated real-time small-business offerings.” Translation: Locu has invented an efficient way to build digital streams of interconnected small-business data that can make local search engines a lot smarter. The hope: Local merchants will have a more effective way to showcase their offerings and consumers can find exactly what they want. If Reinsberg explains Locu in uber-technical terms, it may be because his startup was originally born in an MIT lab under the auspices of tech legend Tim Berners-Lee , who created the world’s first Web browser and server in 1990. Last Fall, in a data course taught by Berners-Lee, Reinsberg, then an MBA candidate, teamed up with his current partners — one other MBA and two computer science PhDs — to compete in an in-class business-plan competition. They took home first prize, and with a nod of approval from one of the inventors of the Web, set out to launch Locu upon graduating in the spring. Less than six months later, the startup has closed a $600,000 round of funding from early-stage investment fund Quotidian Ventures and a pack of prominent angel investors, including some it met through AngelList, a social network that connects startups with investors . The company’s first product is the soon-to-launch MenuPlatform , which offers restaurant owners an easy way to import their menus onto Locu’s database and keep them up-to-date across each site that ends up licensing data from Locu’s repository. While the company hopes to actively work with restaurants, which could be a potential source of revenue, Reinsberg says he doesn’t necessarily need a restaurant’s direct participation to collect and update its menu data. As long as a restaurant has a functioning site with a menu, Locu’s technology can work to fetch the data. Its crawlers can then monitor the menu and automatically make changes to the data Locu stores when it detects updates. But experts still say the most scalable way to collect such an immense amount of menu data is to “crowdsource” it –- that is, convince restaurants to load their data onto the system and keep it updated themselves. As with most things on the Web, MenuPlatform’s power lies in the number of active users it can ultimately attract. Fortunately for Locu and other local business data providers, local search is booming. In 2009, 82 percent of consumers were using search engines to find information about local businesses. Two years later, that stat has grown to 86 percent , due in large part to the increasing prevalence of mobile search. In addition, local search now accounts for 20 percent of all Google search queries, according to the company. Anand Rajaraman, a data scientist at WalMart’s e-commerce group , based in Silicon Valley, predicts that Facebook’s recent changes to its platform could also compel small businesses to spend more time sharing their data and enabling its structuring. After all, it’s just another way to reach their most likely customers. “Facebook enabling new forms of sharing will be a huge incentive for local businesses to open up their catalogs on a deeper level,” Rajaraman says. “Imagine Facebook next launches an ‘eat’ button, just like it has just launched a ‘listen’ button. ‘Nate ate pasta primavera at Joe’s Pizzeria’ could then be something you share with your friends. To make this happen, restaurants would then be incentivized to itemize their menu, and next to their menu items put the ‘eat’ button.” Since Locu formed, its efforts to tailor local search to restaurant menu items has largely mirrored the evolution of local search for non-food items. Major search engines and social networks now often partner with big retailers to make not only general store listings but also actual on-site inventories searchable online. Consumers can now use Google Shopping, for instance, to see which electronics stores in their neighborhood have a certain flat-screen television in stock . And earlier this month, Walmart partnered with Facebook to host updated inventory lists on Facebook pages for each of Walmart’s 3,500 locations. “Today, we don’t connect people with Walmart,” Rajaraman says of the search shift. “We connect people with Walmart items.”

Read the full article →

Herman Cain Likened To Hillary Clinton In Harsh Attack

October 28, 2011

Republican presidential candidate Rick Santorum is out with a hard-hitting new ad targeting rival contender Herman Cain on the issue of abortion. “Now, the most troubling news of all is Herman Cain’s newly-discovered pro-choice position on abortion,” a narrator says in the spot, after briefly taking aim at the former Godfather’s Pizza CEO on fiscal issues. “And Cain’s announcement of his pro-choice position certainly hasn’t gone unnoticed. Pro-life leader Alan Keyes called Cain pro-choice and said Herman Cain’s position is the same postion taken by abortion-rights Democrats like Hillary Clinton. Conservative leader Steve Deace described Cain’s position as favoring baby-murder in cases of rape and incest.” Cain recently found himself having to clarify where he stands on abortion after drawing conservative criticism with remarks he made in a CNN interview . “It’s not the government’s role or anybody else’s role to make that decision,” Cain responded when asked to address the issue applied to a hypothetical rape case. “Secondly, if you look at the statistical incidents, you’re not talking about that big a number. So what I’m saying is it ultimately gets down to a choice that that family or that mother has to make.” Cain sought to do damage control on the comments shortly after during an appearance on Fox News. He explained, “Abortion should not be legal, that is clear. But if that family made a decision to break the law, that’s that family’s decision, that’s all I’m trying to say.” Earlier this week, however, Cain said he doesn’t believe abortion should be part of the political discussion. “But my position is real clear and has been consistent, I am pro-life,” he said. The attack ad from Santorum’s campaign features footage of remarks from Cain defining his stance on the issue. “The more we learn, the more concerned we become,” the spot concludes. It’s not the first time Santorum has pounced on Cain on abortion. “As the author of the legislation that banned partial birth abortions forever, I am stunned that someone running for the Republican nomination for president would have this position,” the former senator recently said in a statement. “In fact, Herman Cain’s pro-choice position is similar to those held by John Kerry, Barack Obama and many others on the liberal left. You cannot be both personally against abortion while condoning it — you can’t have it both ways. We must defend the defenseless, period.” Below, video of the ad rolled out by Santorum’s campaign. WATCH:

Read the full article →

Public College Students Going Public With Frustrations At Occupy Wall Street

October 28, 2011

NEW YORK — Wednesday evening, three college students descended on lower Manhattan’s Zuccotti Park with the hope of unfurling their sleeping bags and staying the night. All three men mentioned the rising cost of higher education as their main motivation for leaving the comfort of their own beds to instead pass the rainy night in a show of solidarity with fellow Occupy Wall Street protesters. “Given everything that’s been going on here, I decided there were bigger things at stake,” said Jorge Javier, 22, who majored in history and political science at Lehman College, part of the City University of New York system, before dropping out two weeks ago. He lives in the Bronx. “I decided to leave it all behind. I decided to drop out in solidarity with this movement.” Citing increasing amounts of student loan debt and the skyrocketing cost of tuition , many college students have gravitated toward the Occupy Wall Street movement . Nationwide, an estimated 150 campuses have staged formal protests and walkouts — with additional teach-ins planned for the middle of next week . For students attending public colleges, fears over financing education are particularly acute. A study released yesterday by the College Board found that average costs at four-year public universities have more than tripled over the past three decades. Further, average tuition rates have increased by 8.3 percent just in the last year alone. Public college students living in New York — a city that contains a number of public institutions — are personally flocking to Zuccotti Park to make their demands known and their voices heard. Another student in the group, James Duarte, scoured the overcrowded park for a place to sleep. Nearly a month ago, Duarte joined the movement after tiring of the fight to stay afloat. He’s a 20-year-old junior at the City University of New York. “Every step I take to try and educate myself in this country is a constant struggle. I just wanted to be educated. It shouldn’t be this difficult,” said Duarte, a Bronx native. His mother emigrated to the U.S. from the Dominican Republic in order to make a better life for her family. As her first child, Duarte said he carries the weight of her expectations on his young shoulders. “I need to be the first college-educated person in my family and we’re in this time of crisis,” Duarte said. He didn’t qualify for federal loans and his mother and stepfather both recently lost their jobs, leaving him scrambling. Currently, Duarte works part-time and lives paycheck to paycheck. He wonders: “Where’s the relief?” As a Latino, Duarte said he sees surprisingly little diversity among his fellow Occupy Wall Street protesters. Lately, he dreams of harnessing the momentum from Zuccotti Park and expanding it northward — all the way to the Bronx. “For the first time, we can talk about an Arab spring, a European summer and an American autumn,” Duarte said, his enthusiasm is undiminished despite the threat of cooler temperatures. “We are at the forefront of something. We are at the beginning.” While Duarte and Javier are regulars who visit the park routinely, their friend Brian Aquino sat looking wide-eyed, simply trying to take it all in. Aquino, 22, who is a sophomore at New York City College of Technology, a CUNY school, paid his first visit to Occupy Wall Street on Wednesday night. Come graduation day, he faces more than $40,000 in student loans. Later in the night, all three men participated in a march that snaked through lower Manhattan protesting recent acts of police brutality in Oakland, Calif . Javier said he personally travels to Zuccotti Park to interact with like-minded people and gain inspiration. Javier’s mother moved to New York from the Dominican Republic when she was pregnant with him. While his stepfather is currently unemployed, his mother is a city employee and local grassroots leader who previously ran for elected office in the Bronx . Since both of his parents have college degrees, Javier’s recent decision to drop out has come as quite a shock. Many of his professors are similarly pleading that he reconsider. “It’s been a big issue, to reject this standard that we’ve all been aspiring toward,” said Javier, who took out about $15,000 in student loans to finance his degree. “In comparison to the $200,000 some people are taking out maybe it doesn’t sound like much. But if you don’t have a way to pay for it, you don’t have a way to pay for it. Our system, it is faltering.”

Read the full article →

Beau Biden Sues Big Banks’ Mortgage Registry

October 28, 2011

Delaware Attorney General Beau Biden sued a private national mortgage registry on Thursday, citing a slew of deceptive trade practices that prevent homeowners from effectively fighting off foreclosure. The lawsuit in state court alleges that Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Inc. deceived borrowers by knowingly obscuring important information, acting as an agent of the true owners of mortgage loans without authority, and failing to properly oversee the registry or enforce its own rules for foreclosure proceedings. Major mortgage industry players — including Bank of America, Wells Fargo, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac — formed MERS in 1995 to bypass county records offices and facilitate the then-booming mortgage-backed securities market. That market’s collapse helped bring about the 2008 Wall Street meltdown that sparked the Great Recession. In a statement outlining the lawsuit , Biden’s office said that MERS “engaged and continues to engage in deceptive trade practices that sow confusion among homeowners, investors, and other stakeholders in the mortgage finance system, seriously damaging the integrity of the land records that are central to Delaware’s real property system, and leading to improper foreclosure practices.” Homeowner confusion arose from the fact that MERS assumed title to the mortgage instruments associated with the loans that its member organizations were bundling and selling off as securities. Yet MERS, according to the complaint, failed to ensure proper transfer of the mortgages, leading it to foreclose upon houses without the authority to do so. Homeowners trying to fight off foreclosure were hampered by the convoluted chain of title — in other words, it wasn’t clear who was actually foreclosing on them. Over the past summer, both Biden and Massachusetts Attorney General Martha Coakley announced investigations into MERS. In the wake of those announcements, MERS revised its rules to forbid its members from foreclosing on houses in the registry’s name, according to a Reuters report . The case of State of Delaware v. MERSCORP Inc. has been filed in the Wilmington division of the Delaware Chancery Court.

Read the full article →

Gordon Whitman: Cry Baby: Bank of America’s CEO Incensed by Criticism

October 28, 2011

Bloomberg News reported today that Bank of America CEO Brian Moynihan is rather upset by all the bad things people are saying about his bank: “I, like you, get a little incensed when you think about how much good all of you do, whether it’s volunteer hours, charitable giving we do, serving clients and customers well,” Moynihan told employees during a global town hall meeting broadcasted from the bank’s headquarters. “You ought to think a little about that before you start yelling at us,” he scolded the banks’ critics. Excuse me, but we’re supposed to feel sorry for a man who earned $10 million last year while taking the homes of tens of thousands of American families and watching his own company teeter toward financial collapse. For three years, faith, community and civil rights organizations have pushed Bank of America to stop mass foreclosures and help get the U.S. housing market working again. Instead the bank has consistently chosen Public Relations over substance, believing it is big enough to bully its way out of responsibility for the mess it created. The Bloomberg article outlines Bank of America’s strategy to deal with the increasing criticism: launch a multi-million dollar campaign to go on the offensive at the local and state level, to kick up as much fear as possible from public officials that the bank will cut them off dry if they say anything negative about the bank’s impact on their communities. And lots of feel-good, full-page ads in local newspapers. Rather than actually change its practices in order to help ordinary Americans, the bank has chosen to double-down on advertising in an effort to fight back reality. No doubt, we will now see the bank dig up all sorts of carefully-chosen statistics about how much it is helping local communities and plaster these on every wall across every town in America. Amidst this PR blitz, we need to keep in mind some simple statistics of our own: Fact #1: Bank of America continues to smother job creation by refusing to lend to small-businesses: Bank of America went from being one of the top SBA lenders in 2006, making $415 million in loans to small businesses, to extending just $46 million in loans in 2010, an 89 percent drop. No wonder that Bloomberg reported that Bank of America ranked lowest in a 24-bank survey of small business customer satisfaction. Fact #2: Bank of America continues to prefer to kick homeowners out of their homes than do permanent, sustainable loan modifications: After participating in the HAMP program for two-and-a-half years, Bank of America has made permanent loan modifications to just 136,195 families. Meanwhile, they’ve denied or canceled modification for 683,000 families. This means homeowners have a one out of six chance of getting a permanent HAMP modification with Bank of America. In August 2011, the bank granted HAMP trial modifications to just 1% of eligible borrowers, according to a monthly report from the U.S. Treasury. Fact #3: Bank of America — and to be fair, the other big banks too — is actually increasing homeowner indebtedness, not reducing it: A report by the Congressional Oversight Panel last December found that nearly 95 percent of active, permanent loan modifications resulted in homeowners actually having a higher unpaid principal balance than before the modification. Translation: even those lucky few who manage to get a mortgage modification from Bank of America still end up deeper in debt than when they started. Keep this in mind every time you hear Bank of America or any other big bank tout big numbers of homeowners they have helped — 95 percent of them are deeper in debt than when they started. Fact #4: Bank of America continues to be a major threat to American taxpayers: And the threat just grew by trillions of dollars. Last week, federal bank regulators allowed Bank of America to transfer the riskiest of its crumbling assets from an uninsured Merrill Lynch division to the deposit-insured and discount-window-eligible Bancorp division. As Simon Johnson from MIT wrote , “The move puts the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. on the hook for any losses…because the agency can tap a U.S. Treasury line of credit if the fund runs dry, taxpayers could be at risk, too.” This is an unacceptable shift of Wall Street risk onto the American taxpayers, and some are saying the beginning of another backdoor bailout for Bank of America. No amount of volunteering or advertising is going to make up for the devastation done by these four simple facts. That is why religious congregations that are part of PICO National Network are joining up with efforts to like Move Your Money to move hundreds of millions of dollars out of big banks like Bank of America and into more responsible local financial institutions. And with New Bottom Line , we’re helping move Responsible Banking laws in more than fifty cities, including a campaign by LA Voice and other grassroots groups to pass a path-breaking ordinance in Los Angeles that would move city dollars into responsible banks based on their foreclosure and lending practices. We’ll keep at it until Bank of America takes the millions it is spending on its PR campaign and instead invests in meaningful assistance for everyday struggling Americans. It might just have the desired effect that Moynihan is looking for.

Read the full article →

Lloyd Chapman: Obama Jobs Bill Ignores Basic Principle of Job Creation: Small Businesses Create All the Jobs

October 27, 2011

Imagine that you’re President Obama and one of your economic advisers tells you that you can create millions of jobs without raising or cutting taxes and without any additional spending. Now imagine that same adviser telling you that you already know what the plan is, and in fact, you promised to fulfill it during your presidential campaign. In February 2008, Barack Obama stated , “Small businesses are the backbone of our nation’s economy and we must protect this great resource. It is time to end the diversion of federal small business contracts to corporate giants.” Every year billions of dollars in federal contracts awarded to companies like Lockheed Martin , General Electric and British Aerospace are recorded as small business contracts, which helps the government appear to be trying to hit its congressionally mandated 23 percent small business contracting goal. During FY 2010, 60 of the top 100 small business federal contractors were actually large businesses. It costs a fortune to win an election, even more to stay in office, and big companies have funds to foot the bill. There are enough of these contracts to buy the House and the Senate, which is at the root of the problem. Without money or lobbying power, even the most vigilant small businesses barely stand a chance, and it’s killing the middle class. There is irrefutable proof that small businesses create virtually all net new jobs. According to data from the U.S. Census Bureau , since 1989, small businesses have created 90 percent of all net new jobs. Large businesses destroyed more jobs than they created almost every year from 2000 to 2008. The Kauffman Foundation says that young firms, which are also small, have created virtually 100 percent of all net new jobs since 1980. Congress understood this in 1953 when they passed the Small Business Act, which remains the statutory mandate that the federal government award 23 percent of contracts to legitimate small businesses. Unfortunately, that goal might as well be in outer space. The federal government has never come close. It is difficult to pin down the actual federal acquisition budget, but it seems to be about $1 trillion, which means small businesses should receive about $230 billion annually. Based on data the American Small Business League (ASBL) has collected through the Freedom of Information Act and by simply looking at the federal government’s own publicly available data, we estimate that small businesses are receiving closer to $50 billion annually. The federal government is the largest purchaser of goods and services in the world. Small businesses need those contracts, not the tax cuts proposed in the president’s jobs bill. If you own a business and the government cuts your payroll tax, you’re not going to hire more employees. Tax cuts don’t create demand. You’re going to hire more employees when demand goes up, which is where the federal government could work wonders for the economy by directing federal contracts to small business, where all the jobs are created. I drafted legislation that would finally stop the government from spending in all the wrong places. The bill is H.R. 3184, “The Fairness and Transparency in Contracting Act of 2011,” and was introduced in the House by Georgia Congressman Hank Johnson. The Small Business Act says that to be considered small, a business must be independently owned, which means not publicly traded. H.R. 3184 would prevent any publicly traded company from receiving small business contracts. If President Obama really wants to create jobs, he’ll stick to his campaign promise and support H.R. 3184, or he will issue an executive order that simply states, “The federal government will no longer report contracts awarded to publicly traded companies as small business contracts.” That would create more jobs and do more to save our devastated economy than anything he has ever proposed.

Read the full article →

Soren Petersen: Music Stylist — the Commercial Effect You Can Hear and Feel

October 27, 2011

A soundtrack counts for at least half of the experience in the creation of a commercial and the music stylist is the one responsible for setting the director’s visual universe to music. Creative people often specialize in a narrow field and may possess only rudimentary musical knowledge. Often, a music stylist is brought in to provide relevant, innovative and unexpected music themes and to translate them into powerful tunes that evoke strong emotions in the listener. Jesper Gadeberg, from Denmark, is one of the world’s leading music stylists, assembling commercial soundtracks for firms ranging from American Airlines, Audi and Volvo to Guinness and Absolut Vodka. He developed his passion and knowledge of music while working in a record shop in Copenhagen. Over time, he realized there was a market for locating just the right sounds for commercials. He now specifies sound effects, discovering tracks and brokering deals between producers and artists from around the world, and much of this magic is performed from his beautiful cottage on the Danish coast! In advertising, as in many creative fields, having the best contacts is key. It is very important for major clients to work with those they consider the best of the best. This includes everyone from the director, stylist, prop guy and location scout to the actors and music stylist. The advertising industry has a unique business model since it makes its money by charging fifteen percent overhead when buying slots for commercials in TV, radio and movies. Web-episodes are now popular and the trend is for commercials to become longer and to be based on short fiction format stories. The product is introduced in the beginning and then reinforced by one or more product placements. The creation of a soundtrack begins with the music stylist receiving a reference advertisement and storyboard of the commercial. Ideally, they then present proposals for a soundtrack before beginning to shoot and this is especially essential if the actors need to sing in the commercial. Sometimes the music does not yet exist and has to be created from scratch, while, at other times, musicians can take an existing track and change it to match the envisioned commercial. Commercial soundtracks can be powerful social trend promoters and music stylists can spot promising future bands and help make them famous. A unique commercial for Spanish beer quickly launched a new band to the top of the charts when all summer long, the whole of Spain began humming the song from the commercial. So, as with many other endeavors, being a successful music stylist is about staying in the forefront of your field, doing inspired work and building and maintaining your connections.

Read the full article →

San Diego Man Launches New Protest: ‘Occupy Pennsylvania Ave.’

October 27, 2011

WASHINGTON — The third planned occupation of the nation’s capital, Occupy Pennsylvania Avenue , has an unusually restrictive set of rules . The protest, which will hold forth in Lafayette Square across the street from the White House, won’t allow camping. Signs, banners and placards will be permitted, but must have “dull ends” and be “made entirely of wood.” Filming and photography will be strictly regulated: “[I]mages, audio or video taken from the event may not be redistributed without written permission.” Patrick Schneider, the organizer of Occupy Pennsylvania Avenue, doesn’t see any conflict in a demonstration related to the other Occupy protests — focused as they are on civil liberties and good government — that would seemingly limit First Amendment freedoms like taking photos. “I’m an event planner by trade and also work in radio,” he said. “So organizing the media is … For me, the thing has to function. Not controlling the media. But directing them in the direction where we can help them the best. If someone comes out and they just want to take a couple of pictures and put it on their website, I don’t have a problem with that. If it’s for commercial use or any media company, that’s the only thing this is regarding. This is the way a lot of things are done, like a football game.” (How Schneider intends to prevent the media or anybody else who lacks his permission from taking pictures of a public protest is unclear.) A $500 donation through the Occupy Pennsylvania Avenue website will earn the donor a performance from Trick The DJ . That’s Schneider, who usually lives in San Diego and has a small team helping him out there, he said, although he’s alone in D.C. No one has made a $500 donation yet. Schneider arrived in Washington on Monday with the idea that Occupy Pennsylvania Avenue might get through to elected officials. “We felt like politicians are largely responsible for the way things are in the world,” he said, sounding not unlike the participants in the city’s two other occupations, Occupy DC in McPherson Square and Stop the Machine in Freedom Plaza (which is adjacent to Pennsylvania Avenue). “There’s a lot of problems with war and social issues. We felt like it should be taken to Pennsylvania Avenue.” In addition to Lafayette Square, Schneider plans to bring Occupy Pennsylvania Avenue to the West Front Lawn of the U.S. Capitol and nearby Upper Senate Park . Schneider has permits allowing him to set up stages in these parks during the daytime (they have to be taken down at night). He’s going to open the microphone up to anyone who wants to speak. He’s thinking of having bands on the weekends. He’s reaching out to politicians to address Occupy Pennsylvania Avenue — Republican presidential candidate Herman Cain and Ohio congressional candidate Joe “The Plumber” Wurzelbacher are two he has in mind. Schneider’s protest is going to follow all applicable laws, he said, so that people who feel like other occupations are too dangerous and too likely to lead to arrest will have a venue. There are other notable differences between his protest and the others: Occupy Pennsylvania Avenue is not leaderless. Schneider is the leader. He is not planning to hold the general assembly meetings that are mainstays of the other Occupy movements. And unlike D.C.’s other occupations, which are planning to go on more or less indefinitely, Schneider’s Occupy protest has an end date — Nov. 20. If there’s any apparent similarity between Schneider’s Occupy protest and the others, outside of the Occupy name, it’s the lack of specific demands. The criticism has been levied since the beginning that none of the Occupy movements have specific demands. The Occupy protesters themselves have rejected this criticism on various grounds: Some say they do in fact have specific demands. Others say it’s their job to point out problems, not to offer solutions. Still others say that their consensus process takes a long time but that eventually specific demands will be made. Occupy Pennsylvania Avenue’s lack of demands is by design. “We don’t have fights with people because we don’t engage in political discussions. I don’t want to be standing for something,” Schneider said. “The only demand I have is that the leaders take notice of us and try to work hard. We want to be a little more engaging, a little more functional, a little more progressive and a little more safe.” “In my mind, this all works,” he added. “Probably to someone who’s more used to the occupation and the civil disobedience and the other methods of doing this, it probably doesn’t make a lot of sense. I’ll admit, for branding purposes, calling it Occupy probably wasn’t the best idea.” Photo by Flickr user timsackton . WATCH Keith Olbermann read a declaration from Occupy Wall Street:

Read the full article →

Netflix Rival Hikes Prices

October 27, 2011

SAN FRANCISCO — Redbox’s DVD rental kiosks are attracting movie lovers fed up with Netflix’s video subscription service. But now Redbox’s owner, Coinstar Inc., is risking its own customer backlash by raising its prices, the same move that triggered Netflix’s recent loss of 800,000 U.S. subscribers. The plot twist emerged Thursday in Coinstar’s latest quarterly report. The company’s earnings nearly doubled, largely because of robust growth at Redbox’s more than 34,000 rental kiosks. But the strong performance was upstaged by Redbox’s decision to raise prices for standard DVDs by 20 percent beginning Monday. The new rental rate will be $1.20 per day, instead of the current $1 daily rate. Redbox prices will remained unchanged for Blu-ray discs at $1.50 per day and video games at $2 per day. Redbox’s change isn’t as jarring as what Netflix did last month, when it hiked prices as much as 60 percent and then irked subscribers even more by announcing a now-aborted plan to split its DVD rentals from its Internet video streaming service. But it spooked investors, especially because Redbox appears to be picking up customers still stewing over the higher prices at Netflix. Coinstar’s shares plunged 10 percent in Thursday’s extended trading. Unlike Netflix, Redbox tested the price increases in several cities during the past year to see how they would change rental patterns. Management concluded there only would be a slight drop-off in DVD rentals. “We didn’t take this lightly,” Coinstar CEO Paul Davis said in a Thursday interview with The Associated Press. Coinstar, which is based in Bellevue, Wash., is charging more to help offset higher expenses for DVDs and processing debit card transactions. Netflix raised its prices in hopes of generating more revenue to license more movies and TV shows for streaming over high-speed Internet connections. The plan backfired, though, leaving Netflix on track to start losing money next year as it tries to repair a badly damaged brand. Coinstar Inc. earned $37.1 million, or $1.18 per share, in the three months that ended in September. That compared with $19.5 million, or 60 cents per share, at the same time last year. The results for the latest quarter blew by the average estimate of 88 cents per share among analysts surveyed by FactSet. The company’s revenue rose 22 percent from last year to $466 million, about $3 million above analyst projections. The Redbox kiosks were Coinstar’s main attraction; revenue in the rental division climbed 28 percent in the quarter to $390 million. Although Davis said the company couldn’t know for certain, it appeared Netflix’s customers losses are turning into Redbox’s gains. As an indication that more people may have been renting from Redbox for the first time, Davis told The Associated Press that the number of unique credit cards used at the kiosks in July through September increased by 8 percent from the previous quarter. By Coinstar’s reckoning, Redbox surpassed the market share of Netflix’s DVD-by-mail service for the first time during the third quarter. Coinstar said it ended September with a U.S. market share of nearly 35 percent compared to 33 percent for Netflix and other DVD-by-mail services. A year ago, Coinstar pegged its market share at 24 percent with Netflix and other DVD-by-mail services at nearly 36 percent. Netflix expects the shift to continue as it focuses more on its video streaming service. Netflix predicted it may end December with 10.3 million DVD subscribers, down 25 percent, or 3.6 million, from the end of September. “We always try to roll out the red carpet for customers who may feel disenfranchised,” Davis said during an interview with the AP. With another potential influx of former Netflix subscribers looming, Coinstar expects its revenue to rise as high as $510 million in the fourth quarter. But the company doesn’t expect to make as much money in the holiday season as it did in the third quarter because a slew of year-end DVD releases of popular movies will drive up its expenses. Coinstar predicted its fourth-quarter earnings will range from 57 cents per share to 67 cents per share. Analysts had projected fourth-quarter earnings of 78 cents per share on revenue of $483 million. Coinstar’s shares fell $5.30 to $47.65 in extended trading after the results were released. If the sell-off holds in Friday’s regular trading, it will wipe out most of the gains Coinstar’s stock has made since Netflix raised its prices.

Read the full article →

Ron Ashkenas: Reorganizing? Think Again

October 27, 2011

If you ask managers to name their favorite sport, you’ll hear a wide variety of answers: Football, baseball, tennis… But what they won’t tell you is the one sport that all managers play the most: The Game of Reorganization. Managers love to reorganize at almost every level. Whether triggered by a leadership transition, a fundamental change in the business, an acquisition, or poor performance; lines, boxes, and people tend to move around. In fact it’s highly unusual to find an organization that has not shifted its structure in some way within the previous six months. But while managers love to engineer reorganizations, most managers (and their people) hate to be reorganized . Much like musical chairs , structural changes provoke anxiety, since people know that the “new and improved” design will often have fewer chairs (i.e., jobs ). More problematic is the fact that a functional organization is only partly determined by structure. Equally important is the web of relationships that people develop over time to get things done. Reorganizations disrupt those relationships, hindering productivity until connections can be rebuilt within the new structure. As one senior executive said to me, “Every time we reorganized, we lost at least a year of innovation.” Despite the downsides, managers will continue to reorganize, since it is one of the most available levers to solve problems . It also creates the appearance of decisive action and buys time until other actions can be taken. And of course they like playing the game. So before you pull the reorganization lever, it will be helpful to ask yourself two questions: What’s the problem you’re trying to solve? Before redrawing your organization chart, make sure you know why you’re doing it. Are you trying to create a sharper focus on customers? Do you want to reduce costs? Are you struggling with performance issues? Do you have too many direct reports to give them sufficient attention? Has the structure become overly complex such that accountability is diffused? Do your people need a wake-up call? These (and many more) might be good reasons to reorganize — but all too often managers leap into a reorganization without being clear about how it will make things better. And without clarifying that basic question, you can’t address the next one. Is reorganization the only possible solution? Reorganization might solve many problems — but it’s hardly ever the only solution. But because it takes little effort to redraw boxes and lines, it’s often the knee-jerk response. For example, the head of a large commercial organization wanted his people to become more focused on targeted customer segments as a way of improving revenue. To solve that problem, he divided up the resources from the various functions (sales, marketing, finance, product management, HR) and created a series of business units. A year later a different manager came in and decided that costs were too high — so she blew up the business units and re-consolidated the functions. In the end, neither manager succeeded because the disruptions and loss of key talent overshadowed any positive results. What’s striking with this case is that reorganization may not have been needed at all. The first manager could have changed incentives for the sales teams, created cross-functional segment teams, or refocused marketing efforts. The second manager could have reduced costs through a more rigorous performance management process, more stringent budget goals, or by asking business units to share certain services with each other. In other words, in many situations reorganization may not necessarily be needed — and may cost more than it’s worth. Given the popularity of the reorganization game, it’s always going to be a favorite part of the manager’s toolkit. And in many cases it may be an appropriate and effective action to take. But to avoid the downside of reorganizations, it’s important to determine what problem is being solved and whether there are less disruptive ways to do so. In your experience with reorganizations, when have they created value — and when have they destroyed it? Cross-posted from Harvard Business Online .

Read the full article →

Ron Ashkenas: Reorganizing? Think Again

October 27, 2011

If you ask managers to name their favorite sport, you’ll hear a wide variety of answers: Football, baseball, tennis… But what they won’t tell you is the one sport that all managers play the most: The Game of Reorganization. Managers love to reorganize at almost every level. Whether triggered by a leadership transition, a fundamental change in the business, an acquisition, or poor performance; lines, boxes, and people tend to move around. In fact it’s highly unusual to find an organization that has not shifted its structure in some way within the previous six months. But while managers love to engineer reorganizations, most managers (and their people) hate to be reorganized . Much like musical chairs , structural changes provoke anxiety, since people know that the “new and improved” design will often have fewer chairs (i.e., jobs ). More problematic is the fact that a functional organization is only partly determined by structure. Equally important is the web of relationships that people develop over time to get things done. Reorganizations disrupt those relationships, hindering productivity until connections can be rebuilt within the new structure. As one senior executive said to me, “Every time we reorganized, we lost at least a year of innovation.” Despite the downsides, managers will continue to reorganize, since it is one of the most available levers to solve problems . It also creates the appearance of decisive action and buys time until other actions can be taken. And of course they like playing the game. So before you pull the reorganization lever, it will be helpful to ask yourself two questions: What’s the problem you’re trying to solve? Before redrawing your organization chart, make sure you know why you’re doing it. Are you trying to create a sharper focus on customers? Do you want to reduce costs? Are you struggling with performance issues? Do you have too many direct reports to give them sufficient attention? Has the structure become overly complex such that accountability is diffused? Do your people need a wake-up call? These (and many more) might be good reasons to reorganize — but all too often managers leap into a reorganization without being clear about how it will make things better. And without clarifying that basic question, you can’t address the next one. Is reorganization the only possible solution? Reorganization might solve many problems — but it’s hardly ever the only solution. But because it takes little effort to redraw boxes and lines, it’s often the knee-jerk response. For example, the head of a large commercial organization wanted his people to become more focused on targeted customer segments as a way of improving revenue. To solve that problem, he divided up the resources from the various functions (sales, marketing, finance, product management, HR) and created a series of business units. A year later a different manager came in and decided that costs were too high — so she blew up the business units and re-consolidated the functions. In the end, neither manager succeeded because the disruptions and loss of key talent overshadowed any positive results. What’s striking with this case is that reorganization may not have been needed at all. The first manager could have changed incentives for the sales teams, created cross-functional segment teams, or refocused marketing efforts. The second manager could have reduced costs through a more rigorous performance management process, more stringent budget goals, or by asking business units to share certain services with each other. In other words, in many situations reorganization may not necessarily be needed — and may cost more than it’s worth. Given the popularity of the reorganization game, it’s always going to be a favorite part of the manager’s toolkit. And in many cases it may be an appropriate and effective action to take. But to avoid the downside of reorganizations, it’s important to determine what problem is being solved and whether there are less disruptive ways to do so. In your experience with reorganizations, when have they created value — and when have they destroyed it? Cross-posted from Harvard Business Online .

Read the full article →

Global 8 Environmental Technologies Signs Sustainability Leader as BioOrganics Portfolio Manager

October 27, 2011

SAN DIEGO, CA–(Marketwire – Oct 27, 2011) – Global 8 Environmental Technologies ( PINKSHEETS : GBLE ) is expanding its management team with the addition of Dan Noble as BioOrganics Portfolio Manager. He is an industry leader who brings technical depth and broad market awareness to the team.

Read the full article →

Bonanza Goldfields Names PM Foo Interim CFO

October 27, 2011

PHOENIX, AZ–(Marketwire – Oct 27, 2011) – Bonanza Goldfields Corp. ( PINKSHEETS : BONZ ) (“Bonanza” or the “Company”) is pleased to announce the appointment of Mr. Peng-Mun (PM) Foo to the position of Interim Chief Financial Officer effective immediately. He has been a member of the Bonanza advisory board since July 2011.

Read the full article →

Charles E. Levine Joins Board of Directors of Elephant Talk Communications

October 27, 2011

Started New Businesses for Sprint PCS, AT&T, GE, Octel, and Others

Read the full article →

Turbulent markets and ‘ultra-defensive’ stocks

October 27, 2011

(MENAFN – Arab News) Since US GDP was revised down and the political impasse over debt ceiling talks in the US, the financial markets have been particularly volatile. Asset classes that …

Read the full article →

Norway, UK sign sweeping energy deal

October 27, 2011

(MENAFN – Saudi Press Agency) An agreement to cooperate on renewable and conventional energy resources with Norway is key to long-term energy security, UPI quoted a British official as …

Read the full article →

Merkel calls on G20 to introduce a financial transaction tax

October 27, 2011

(MENAFN – Saudi Press Agency) German Chancellor Angela Merkel said Wednesday that Europe will call on the Group of 20 leading economies to introduce a financial transaction tax at their summit in …

Read the full article →

Enerji Limited (ASX:ERJ) Signs Memorandum of Understanding with Poseidon Nickel Limited (ASX:POS)

October 27, 2011

http://www.abnnewswire.net/rss2/menafn/abn_menafn_en.asp Emerging green power utility, Enerji Limited (ASX:ERJ) has entered into a memorandum of understanding (“MoU”) with Poseidon Nickel Ltd …

Read the full article →

Euro Leaders’ Statement After EU Debt Crisis Summit

October 27, 2011

1. Over the last three years, we have taken unprecedented steps to combat the effects of the world-wide financial crisis, both in the European Union as such and within the euro area. The strategy …

Read the full article →

Global Capacity Hires Craig Magerkurth as Chief Technology Officer

October 27, 2011

CHICAGO, IL–(Marketwire – Oct 27, 2011) – Global Capacity , the world’s leading telecommunications information and logistics company, announces the addition of Craig Magerkurth as Chief Technology Officer, to its executive leadership team.

Read the full article →

Clear Capital(R) Expands Senior Leadership to Power New Initiatives and Fuel Growth

October 27, 2011

Company Adds Extensive Financial and Marketing Management Experience to Support Business Expansion and Maintain Excellence in Services and Solutions

Read the full article →

Colgate-Palmolive Q3 net income rises 4%

October 27, 2011

(MENAFN) Colgate-Palmolive said that as a result of a surge in sales in emerging markets, higher prices and the company’s measures to control cost, third-quarter net income grew 4 percent, reported …

Read the full article →

US Dow Chemical Q3 profit surges 59%

October 27, 2011

(MENAFN) Dow Chemical’s Co. Chairman and CEO, Andrew N. Liveris, said that as a result of a rise in prices and a surge in sales growth in Asia and Latin America, profit in the third quarter hiked 59 …

Read the full article →