October 2011

USD/JPY Classical Technical Report 10.24

October 24, 2011

USD/JPY:Although the market remains largely confined to the 76.00’s, the recent break to fresh record lows below the figure suggests that we still could see additional weakness before any …

Read the full article →

EUR/USD Classical Technical Report 10.24

October 24, 2011

EUR/USD: At this point there are still no signs of let up, although we continue to classify the latest market rally out from 1.3145 as corrective. We contend that a fresh lower top will carve …

Read the full article →

GBP/USD Classical Technical Report 10.24

October 24, 2011

GBP/USD: The market has been well bid since breaking the neckline of a double bottom at 1.5715, with rallies extending into the 1.6000 area thus far. The measured move objective for the pattern …

Read the full article →

Dave Johnson: Is a Flat Tax Fair?

October 24, 2011

Conservatives are always pushing for a “flat tax.” It sounds so simple: One easy rate, so we all pay the same, easy to calculate… Get rid of deductions and lower the tax rates. So simple, but it turns out it is a simple trick, a scam to enrich the 1%, like so much else that conservatives are selling. Don’t fall for it — it means taxes will go up for the 99% of us who aren’t really, really rich. See if you can guess what happens if you are in the top 1%. Or, just scroll down and see the the chart. What We Have Now We have what’s called a “progressive’ tax system. This means as you make more you pay more taxes. The first “bracket” of XX dollars you make is taxed at a low rate. The next XX dollars are taxed at a higher rate, and so on. Many people think if you “go into a higher bracket” you pay more on all the money you make, but that is not how it works. If a bracket starts at $1 million, and you make $1 million plus $1 you only pay the higher rate on the $1 that is in that bracket. Yes, that means that a 5% increase on taxes over $1 million would mean that person pays a nickel. Yes, all that screaming by Republicans is over a nickel. Screaming is what they do best. The reason we have a progressive tax system is because we have a democracy. People who make more do so because of the investment in government that We, the People make. We, the People pool our money collectively and use it to build the infrastructure that lets people make so much money. That’s the roads, schools, police, courts, etc. — the whole system — that provides the foundation for our businesses to go out and compete in the world. And when our businesses do well, we ask them to pay back a dividend to the rest of us for enabling that to happen. No Deductions Conservatives always call for getting rid of deductions, because they are complicated. Get rid of deductions, they say, simplify the system, and you can lower tax rates. Here is the game they are playing. Suppose you have a small business, a grocery store. Suppose you buy $100,000 in inventory and sell it for $130,000. If you get rid of deductions that means the small grocery owner pays taxes on $130,000 because that is the income of the store. If you say the business owner should be allowed to “deduct” the amount paid for inventory, we’re back to deciding which deductions to allow. So we are right back where we started, except now the conservatives have lowered tax rates (at the top) and their big corporate sponsors will be gaming the system to give themselves more and more and more deductions just like they already do. What Happens With A Flat Tax? Conservatives object to the idea of the rich paying back more. They say that taxes are theft — government confiscating money that people have earned, ignoring that our democracy enabled them to earn it in the first place. They call taxation “redistribution” of wealth. Of course, as AlterNet’s Joshua Holland points out, redistribution is the core job of government. He points out that when government collects taxes and builds a sidewalk that everyone can walk on — or homeless people can sleep on — that is redistribution. Courts, schools, police, ports, airports — all of it is redistribution of wealth. So conservatives call for a “flat tax.” Most notably Republican presidential candidates Rick Perry and Herman Cain are calling for various forms of this. This means everyone pays the same tax rate as everyone else, regardless of income. Because this is about scrapping democracy’s progressive tax system, this necessarily means that the rich will pay a lot less. Guess who pays more to make up for that? A good example of this effect is the 9-9-9 tax plan. The 9-9-9 Plan The Tax Policy Center takes a look at Republican candidate Herman Cain’s “9-9-9″ tax plan, in a post titled, Herman Cain’s 9-9-9 Tax Plan Herman Cain’s plan would eliminate the current individual income tax, corporate income tax, payroll tax, and estate and gift tax and substitute three taxes imposed at a 9 percent rate: 1) a 9 percent “national sales tax” 2) a 9 percent “business flat tax”, and 3) a 9 percent “individual flat tax.” They have a table here that shows how people’s taxes would change under the 9-9-9 plan. Jared Bernstein made a chart illustrating these numbers in his post 9-9-9 in One (Really Long) Graph . So here you have it: the change in tax liabilities, compared to current tax policy, under 9-9-9, for different income groups, in one incredibly unsettling graph. In the following chart the blue lines that are above zero illustrate how much more most of us will pay. The red lines below zero show how much less the rich and really rich will pay. The blue lines — representing taxes on most of us — go up. The red lines — representing taxes on the top few — go … well, see for yourself. This post originally appeared at Campaign for America’s Future (CAF) at their Blog for OurFuture . I am a Fellow with CAF. Sign up here for the CAF daily summary .

Read the full article →

Ice cream vendor gets prison for selling drugs with treats

October 24, 2011

(MENAFN – Jordan Times) An ice cream vendor who peddled prescription painkillers from the same truck he sold frozen treats to kids, was sentenced on Tuesday to three and a half years in prison. …

Read the full article →

Pole finally cleared of Soviet-era slander charge

October 24, 2011

(MENAFN – Jordan Times) Fifty years after he was sentenced to prison for blaming Soviet dictator Nikita Khrushchev for a meat shortage in Poland, a Pole was finally cleared of wrong-doing Wednesday …

Read the full article →

Nigerians wait for actor’s bowel movements

October 24, 2011

(MENAFN – Jordan Times) A Nigerian actor known for his comedic roles has found himself in a real-life absurdity: His bowel movements are being dutifully reported on front pages after he was detained …

Read the full article →

Ecuador’s president may have familiar rival

October 24, 2011

(MENAFN – Jordan Times) Businessman Fabricio Correa said Wednesday that since no one else has stepped up to run against Ecuadoran President Rafael Correa, he will take on his brother, if the leader …

Read the full article →

Hawk with nail in head still free in San Francisco

October 24, 2011

(MENAFN – Jordan Times) A wildlife rescue group tried unsuccessfully for a third day Wednesday to capture and rescue a red-tailed hawk in a San Francisco park that appears to have been shot in the …

Read the full article →

Euro shrugs off early lows to wind up higher against dollar; yen advances

October 24, 2011

(MENAFN – Arab Times) Depending on when you ask, you would get a different answer whether the market believes the G20 meeting would achieve any material progress on Greece this weekend. After a …

Read the full article →

Mutiny Gold Limited (ASX:MYG) Gives ATW Gold Corp Formal Notice of Move to 100% Ownership of Gullewa Gold Project

October 24, 2011

http://www.abnnewswire.net/rss2/menafn/abn_menafn_en.asp Australian Gold-Copper resources company Mutiny Gold Limited (ASX:MYG) is pleased to advise that in accordance with the farm-in and joint …

Read the full article →

Kingsrose Mining Limited (ASX:KRM) Webcast – Presentation at Resources Rising Stars

October 24, 2011

http://www.abnnewswire.net/rss2/menafn/abn_menafn_en.asp Kingsrose Mining Limited (ASX:KRM) provides the opportunity to view a webcast with Chris Start, Managing Director, in a presentation titled …

Read the full article →

Publicity and adulation have bloated Assange

October 24, 2011

(MENAFN – Arab News) WHEN Julian Assange, father of WikiLeaks, makes a viral enemy of a potential friend, he always does so in the name of a Higher Cause. Such mavericks are necessary in an age …

Read the full article →

China Jan-Jul trade with N Korea surges 87%

October 24, 2011

(MENAFN) China’s ambassador to North Korea, Liu Hongcai, said that in the January-July period, the country’s trade with North Korea rose nearly to the double, with an increase of 87 percent from …

Read the full article →

Pakistan releases Indian helicopter

October 24, 2011

(MENAFN – Arab News) Pakistan released an Indian Army helicopter just hours after it strayed across the tense border between the two countries on Sunday, officials said, underscoring a desire by the …

Read the full article →

Japan Sep exports up 2.4% to USD78.2b

October 24, 2011

(MENAFN) Japan’s Finance Ministry said that in September, the country’s exports grew for the second consecutive month, recording an incerase of 2.4 percent over the same period in 2010 to USD78.2 …

Read the full article →

Businesses seek gains from flattening rate curve

October 24, 2011

(MENAFN – Arab News) In August of this year, all the members of the Bank of England Monetary Policy Committee agreed for the first time since May 2010 to hold the base rate at 0.5 percent, with the …

Read the full article →

Al Checchi: We Have Met the Enemy and He Is Us

October 24, 2011

We hear a lot these days about those evil corporations and their pernicious effect on America. Should we hunt down these malefactors of malice? Perhaps, but on examination, they would be us. Off with our heads? Every one of us who is not employed by the government but engages in some commercial endeavor, be it giving manicures or building bridges, conducts these activities either as a sole proprietorship, partnership, or corporation. The differences: unlike proprietorships and partnerships, corporations are taxed twice, once at the corporate level and again at the individual stockholder level, but their owners (shareholders) are insulated from personal liability. For example if I own a restaurant as an individual proprietor, I can be sued personally by an accident victim. A corporation like McDonald’s may be sued for the same accident but its individual shareholders cannot. Without the protections of limited liability, very few individuals would be willing to invest in any enterprise and subject themselves to defending against potentially unlimited liability. Our very first corporate charters were granted by the states to induce private individuals to join together to build large infrastructure projects like bridges and turnpikes. What do American corporations do today? They do the same thing that any proprietor does, e.g. make and deliver goods and services. They succeed or fail based on the difference in the value that consumers put on their products and the cost of producing them – that ugly thing called “profits”. The formula for running a successful business is quite simple: combine human and material resources as efficiently as possible to create the greatest amount of value for the consumer. Most corporations like Apple, Microsoft, Federal Express, Marriott, and Proctor and Gamble obey the rules and strive and succeed at developing and producing popular products and services that create value (what some call corporate greed). Others like Enron and WorldCom break the rules. Corporations are only as good or bad as the people who run them. Just as most people are honest and do not break the law, most people through their actions as (proprietors, partners, and corporate employees) are honest and conduct themselves within its bounds. Some obviously don’t and they should be removed and punished. Most behave ethically; too many don’t. That is human nature. And as in any endeavor, half the people running business enterprises are below average. Only a minority are exceptional. Corporations are our principal providers of employment but that is decidedly not their objective. Their objective is to maximize profits (more corporate greed). They seek ways to make investments and increase value (provide more goods and services at a profit). To do this generally requires that they employ more people. Employment is the byproduct of investment. Governments have a role in this process too. While they don’t create employment directly, they are a major influence on the ability and willingness to make investments that increase employment. Case in point: As recently reported in the Wall Street Journal, California based CKE which operates 3000 restaurants nationwide is no longer opening restaurants in California but is opening 300 in Texas. One of the reasons: In California the regulatory process can take two years versus only 6 weeks in Texas and as a result, the cost of opening a restaurant in California is $200,000 greater. Similarly, America will import approximately $350 billion of oil this year. While we have many proponents of “green energy”, until we develop viable alternatives to fossil fuel, we must continue to consume oil. We have ample untapped oil reserves of our own to replace all imports. If not restricted by government, we would invest in extracting them. This would create jobs in the oil industry. The $350 billion increase in domestic income and spending would produce more jobs. And the increase in supply and resulting decrease in the cost of oil would allow consumers to spend their savings on other things and increase jobs even more. The lesson, if you want to create jobs, shape public policy to attract private investment. America and indeed the world have no shortage of individuals or enterprises that want to make a buck. Off with their heads?

Read the full article →

Peter Watson: Diversity – will Business Ever Believe in Change?

October 24, 2011

In the 1987 film The Secret of My Success , Michael J Fox’s character endures a string of knockbacks at interview so by the end of a gruelling day and feeling increasingly desperate he begs: “I can be anything, just give me a chance…” “Can you be a minority woman?” the interviewer replies. While amusing for its comedy timing this is a divisive issue which challenges many of us at a personal level by questioning received wisdom about justice and opportunity. Is the employer’s stance correct? Are arbitrary targets to expand minority groups’ representation within an organisation the only certain method of improving diversity? Do we need to improve diversity at all? Almost 25 years on from Brantley Foster’s fictional escapades in New York, here in the UK boardrooms remain staggeringly male dominated with just 12.5% of publicly owned companies appointing women to director-level positions. This topic has gained traction as recently as 11 October with the UK’s Corporate Governance Regulator updating its Combined Code to include a requirement for those companies to report annually on their boardroom diversity policy, including gender. My own industry, legal services, has similar obligations to face up to over the coming years, after regulators declared us a sector too commonly associated with one that favours privilege and upbringing over the promotion of social mobility. The Solicitors Regulation Authority has now made the active promotion of equality and diversity by Law firms a key principle that they should all abide by. This has led to a stampede of conscience amongst the UK’s largest law firms with many big names publishing their own diversity statistics. While being an immensely noble effort these stats tell us a great deal about what we already knew, that the demographic background, ethnic, gender and disability makeup of a law firm will often reflect a customer base whose circumstances tend to mirror its own – it’s good for business. Our firm has also undergone an exercise to promote diversity for the principal reason that while our practice is broad, we represent working people on a daily basis. Our commitment to them and the laws which protect them from exploitation or prejudice has to be reflected in our corporate makeup. So instead of publishing statistics we looked outside for independent verification of what we were doing. Our regulator offers limited guidance on how law firms should consider operating, and there is no universally recognised accreditation akin to Investors in People, so we enlisted an independent group to interpret our policies in relation to equality and corporate social responsibility. For those of you craving a stat, we have 31 partners and 17 of them are women, so with regards to that particular indicator our equality mission is on target. Nevertheless, providing opportunities for people from disadvantaged backgrounds or with disabilities remains a challenge for us as an employer and requires continual self-analysis in order to justify our policies on recruitment, our ties with educational establishments and myriad other considerations. Received wisdom, and the established way of doing business, are in the context of promoting diversity in the workplace just another definition for prejudice. It doesn’t surprise me that fewer than 15% of FTSE 250 directors are women, nor that 97% of law firm partners are classed as white; what continues to shock me is that so few of us genuinely believe that this will ever change.

Read the full article →

Wendy N. Powell: Job Seekers: 11 Ways to Stand Out in the Sea of Competition

October 23, 2011

Companies report that there are hundreds, if not thousands of candidates for their job postings. More than ever, it’s up to you to figure out how to stand out in the crowded sea of competition. You may meet all of the criteria for selection and get overlooked without any thought. Market yourself with information that says “You can’t afford to pass me up!” The process of searching for jobs is easy enough. You visit job sites, find the jobs you want, send the resume, and you get magically considered for the job. It’s simple enough but your resume goes into an abyss unless you can grab the attention of the company. But, how do you know that you will be seriously considered for the job? And are you prepared to present yourself in the best light? The answer is also simple: dazzle yourself, and unless you dazzle the reviewer, your candidacy will be ignored. 1. Get to know yourself again. Before you conduct a job search, take a long, hard look at yourself again. Chances are your skills have changed. Decide how to impress yourself before you present your skills to prospective employers. Research your field of interest again. Brush up on the competencies of leadership and practice those qualities and become a personal expert. Be prepared to tell employers what you would do to make their job better. Don’t forget, creativity is the number one competency employers look for. 2. Conduct your own personal SWOT analysis to market yourself. To refresh your memory, SWOT stands for your personal strengths and weaknesses, and the outside opportunities and threats. • Make a critical list of your strengths. Don’t expect to do this all in one sitting. Really, think this through. What activities do you enjoy? What do you do well? List your accomplishments that make you the most effective. Can you turn these strengths into possibilities for your personal growth? Take your time and you will reach conclusions that will lead you into your next move. • Your weaknesses are just as important. Again, a critical look at your attributes including the negative ones will keep you away from things you are just no good at. • Perhaps finding and weighing the opportunities are the most difficult. With the current job market with limited career choices, think about your horizons and potential creative opportunities from the pool of your chosen strengths. Keep apprised of the industries that are hiring in the chosen area and be aware of the possibility of relocating. If you want to start your own business, invest with your eyes open wide. • Threats to your success are unfortunately abundant but chose the right direction that keeps you from the areas of no return. Employers are checking you out, you need to check them out too. In an ever-changing workforce don’t get caught behind the times. Spend time on prospective employers’ websites. Research the current challenges of the field and be prepared to discuss your creative approach to problem solving. Ask them about their goals and priorities for the coming year. They like questions that will lead them to see that you are imaginative and eager to problem solve. 3. Scope out your competition. Your competition includes the eager, newly-degreed, the “overqualified” candidates looking to re-position themselves in the job market, and the trainee who is willing to take less money to get the foot in the door. Employers like fresh, contemporary experience. You can glean on to that bandwagon by writing about your fresh knowledge and practice questions you will be asked. Your fresh perspective can come from research. Use the internet to your advantage. Never forget, knowledge is power. Get ahead of the crowd. 4. Become employed Months ago, I lamented about the concerns with employers refusing to consider job candidates that were not currently employed. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/wendy-n-powell/refusing-to-hire-the-unem_b_683634.html This has continued to be a problem for job candidates but you need to make sure you are not in the rejection pile. First of all, become employed… somewhere, somehow. That’s easy enough to say but find a job. Head this barrier off at the pass. It’s an all too common problem. Find local opportunities for temporary or contract work. Volunteer at a local organization that is in the business of your goals or a local charity. It keeps you fresh, not to mention out of the rejection pile. 5. Polish up your references. Look at the bridges that you have not burned and use them to your advantage. Ask former bosses and colleagues to write a letter that describes your strengths. Send them along with your resume. Refrain from writing “references upon request.” Of course you will provide them. But, head them off at the pass by being the pro-active candidate they can’t refuse. 6. Glean on to a former favorite professor of yours. Believe me, we love it when former students return to visit the classroom and ask for career advice and the latest “buzz” in the business. Listen to mentors to be able to discuss the language of the industry. Familiarize yourself with the latest news in your field. You become the source of knowledge that companies need to stay afloat and thrive. Keep that in mind when you are preparing to market yourself. 7. Make a list of the most memorable learning experiences from your education. Don’t lose those thoughts, ever. Think about how you could apply these pearls of wisdom in your job search and in your career. 8. Write an impressive and custom cover letter. There is only one of you but every job has unique expectations. Granted, many employees don’t read them, but many do. Look at the selection criteria on the job posting and address each of the qualifications that you have related to the job. Similar to your opening paragraph on your resume, focus on your accomplished, creative projects. What have you done well, what projects have you successfully completed. Don’t forget, many employers are looking for new blood and new ideas. Tell them what you have done and what you will do for their organization. Focus on your success and good things will happen. 9. Clean up your Facebook page. You may ask, what business is my personal Facebook to an employer? They do look and seek you on social media. Many think it’s illegal. Let me tell you, it is not illegal and companies do their research to look at your personality. If you have pictures of yourself with a lampshade on your head at a party, assume that prospective employers can see it. Be safe, cleanse your social media! 10. Don’t let them see you sweat. Of course you are concerned about the competition but the more prepared you are, the luckier you become. Practice your confidence by rehearsing expected interview questions. Your confidence will grow with your comfort zone. When you dance, the steps you learn become second nature to you and you can concentrate on polish and flair. The same thing applies to marketing yourself. Learn those steps well. 11. Don’t trash your former employer. Oh, you may want to do just that but refrain from complaining at any cost. Despite the fact that the prospective employer may understand your plight, the job search process is not the time for complaining. You may be negative about your experiences and employment status but don’t wallow in it. You need to move on. If you don’t, it shows. One wise recruiter once told me that some of the most successful job candidates circumvent the posting process by contacting the decision makers directly. Find out who heads up the department you want to work for and send your resume and cover letter to that person. What do you have to lose?; A job opportunity? Who wouldn’t want to receive the perfect candidate wrapped up in a bow? Don’t forget, there is life outside of the comfort zone. You actually might like it there and thrive.

Read the full article →

The 10 Most And Least Energy-Efficient U.S. States

October 23, 2011

Massachusetts took the lead in energy efficiency in the U.S. this year, bumping California from its four year winning streak, according to a recently released scorecard. The fifth edition of the American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy (ACEEE) scorecard shows that even through uncertain economic times, U.S. states are generating cost savings, promoting technological innovation and stimulating growth by implementing energy efficiency as their key strategy, according to EC&M. The Los Angeles Times reported that the ACEEE Executive Director Steven Nadel said: “Energy efficiency is America’s abundant, untapped energy resource and the states continue to press forward to reap its economic and environmental benefits.” Thomas Bourgeois, Co-Director of the U.S. Department of Energy Northeast Clean Energy Application Center said: “The legislation requires electric utilities in Massachusetts to purchase all available energy efficiency improvements that cost less than it does to generate power,” He added: “It has been a major boon to energy efficiency in Massachusetts over the past three years,” according to Forbes Magazine. The ACEEE report says of Massachusetts: “Massachusetts has a long record of success implementing energy efficiency programs.” “The state took a major leap forward in 2008, however,” It writes, “when it passed the Green Communities Act, which established energy efficiency as the state’s ‘first-priority’ resource, creating an Energy Efficiency Advisory Council to collaborate with utilities to develop statewide efficiency plans in three-year cycles. The three-year plan in operation aims to achieve electric savings equal to 2.4 percent and natural gas savings equal to 1.5 percent of sales in 2012, which amounts to the most aggressive EERS target in the nation. The Green Communities Act is ultimately expected to lead to an investment of $2.2 billion in energy efficiency and demand resources between 2010 and 2012.” “Thanks to our investments in innovation and infrastructure, Massachusetts is now leading the nation in energy efficiency,” said Governor Deval Patrick. “Through our Green Communities Act, we set aggressive goals and laid the foundation for greater investment in energy efficiency – and now we are proud to be a model for the nation and world,” he said in a press release. According to the Los Angeles Times , the scores analyzed states (plus District of Columbia) based on: “weighted criteria that gave more credit to states that offered utility and public benefits funds and also had the best efficiency programs and policies (20 points possible). That was followed in importance by transportation, building energy codes and state government initiatives.” Take a look at the 10 most energy-efficient states, and then the 10 least energy-efficient states: —

Read the full article →

Iraq’s ‘Frontier Investors’ Unlikely To Be Scared Off By U.S. Exit

October 23, 2011

BAGHDAD (Serena Chaudhry) – Foreign investors eager to snap up development projects in key oil producer Iraq are unlikely to balk after the United States withdraws all its troops at the end of the year as long as security does not deteriorate. U.S. President Barack Obama said on Friday all U.S. forces would leave Iraq at the end of 2011 as scheduled, almost nine years after the 2003 U.S.-led invasion that toppled dictator Saddam Hussein. Iraq is trying to rebuild after decades of war and economic sanctions and needs investment in every sector. The OPEC member country has signed a series of deals with international firms to develop its oil fields, the fourth-biggest in the world. Foreign investors like oil majors Royal Dutch Shell and BP and bank HSBC are already pouring billions of dollars into Iraq and a U.S. pullout will likely not thwart foreign firms for an extended period, especially those with long-standing interests in the country. “Any impact on investment will be short-term and quite muted, assuming the security situation doesn’t deteriorate drastically,” said Economist Intelligence Unit’sAli al-Saffar. “This is primarily because Iraq has only really managed to attract (beyond the oil sector), frontier investors who have some level of appetite for risk so far. These more adventurous investors know the risks associated with doing business in the country, and have become quite adept at dealing with them.” Iraqi security forces continue to battle a stubborn Sunni insurgency and Shi’ite militias, and bombings and killings still occur on a daily basis despite a sharp drop in violence from the height of sectarian fighting in 2006-07. For investors on the ground, primary concerns center around kidnapping threats and attacks on development sites. Oil pipelines are targeted by insurgents in the north and south. Some production at the southern Rumaila oilfield was stopped this month when two bombs hit pipelines. Most foreign companies with a footprint in Iraq hire personal security guards for their protection and analysts say it is unlikely the departure of U.S. troops by year-end will raise extensive concern. “For quite some time, investors have been operating in Iraq without very much in the way of assistance from the U.S. military so they may not notice a big difference following the withdrawal,” said AKE Group senior risk consultant John Drake. MORE CONFIDENCE Iraq’s government aims to attract $86 billion in investment by 2014 under a five-year economic development plan. Rehabilitation of the oil, housing, agriculture and power sectors are seen as most pressing. The head of Iraq’s National Investment Commission, Sami al-Araji, said in July the country had secured around $6 billion in investment for licensed projects so far this year. Examples of deals include a $472 million contract with Italy’s Saipem for an oil export facility expansion and sub-sea pipeline and a 100,000-unit housing project with South Korea’s Hanwha Engineering & Construction. Foreign investors have also been net buyers on the Iraq Stock Exchange (ISX) so far this year, buying 66 billion shares to end-September with a volume of $110 million, according to ISX chief executive Taha Abdulsalam. “The complete pullout will probably slow down flows to ISX in the short-term, but overall this news is priced into the market by serious investors,” said Carl Wahlquist Ortiz, investment manager at City of London Investment Management in Dubai. “Typically, if you’re looking at Iraq, you’re looking for something a bit more risky, generally speaking.” Iraq’s stock market is still relatively small compared to international exchanges and its regional counterparts, but volume on the local bourse is expected to rise as more companies, particularly the local mobile phone firms, list. “It (the withdrawal) has to bring more confidence in the political and economic management of Iraq and confidence in the capability of enforcing security,” saidAmar Essa al-Jawahiri, an independent industrial and investment consultant in Baghdad. Iraq’s northern Kurdish region is a prime example of a part of Iraq where foreign investment and construction is booming. The area has been a place of relative calm since becoming a semi-autonomous zone under Western protection in 1991 and is widely regarded as a safe haven. (Editing by Jim Loney and Mike Nesbit) Copyright 2011 Thomson Reuters. Click for Restrictions .

Read the full article →

Over A Third Of Americans Support Occupy Wall Street Protests: Poll

October 23, 2011

WASHINGTON — More than one-third of the country supports the Wall Street protests, and even more – 58 percent – say they are furious about America’s politics. The number of angry people is growing as deep reservoirs of resentment grip the country, according to the latest Associated Press-GfK poll. Some 37 percent of people back the protests that have spread from New York to cities across the country and abroad, one of the first snapshots of how the public views the “Occupy Wall Street” movement. A majority of those protest supporters are Democrats, but the anger about politics in general is much more widespread, the poll indicates. “They’ve got reasons to be upset, they’ve got reasons to protest, but they’re protesting against the wrong people,” Jan Jarrell, 54, a retired school custodian from Leesville, S.C., says of the New York demonstrators. “They need to go to Washington, to Congress and the White House. They’re the ones coming up with all the rules.” “Occupy Wall Street” has been called the liberal counterpoint to conservative-libertarian tea party, which injected a huge dose of enthusiasm into the Republican Party and helped it win the House and make gains in the Senate last fall. While the troubled economy is at the root of anger at both government and business leaders, there’s a key difference. Tea party activists generally argue that government is the problem, and they advocate for free markets. The Wall Street protesters generally say that government can provide some solutions and the free market has run amok. Of the Americans who support the Wall Street protests, 64 percent in the poll are Democrats, while 22 percent are independents and just 14 percent are Republicans. The protest backers are more likely to approve of President Barack Obama and more likely to disapprove of Congress than are people who don’t support the demonstrations. More generally, many more Americans – 58 percent – say they are furious about the country’s politics than did in January, when 49 percent said they felt that way. What’s more, nearly nine in 10 say they are frustrated with politics and nearly the same say they are disappointed, findings that suggest people are deeply resentful of the political bickering over such basic government responsibilities as passing a federal budget and raising the nation’s debt limit. This wrath spreads across political lines, with about six in 10 Democrats, Republicans and independents saying politics makes them angry. Fewer are hopeful about politics than when the year began, 47 percent down from 60 percent. Only 17 percent of respondents say they feel proud or inspired. Since January, Congress and the White House have engaged in repeated standoffs over federal spending and the size of government as the economy has struggled to recover from recession. In the past month, fury over all that has spilled into New York’s financial district, and groups of mostly young people have camped out in a park. The protesters cite the economic crisis as a key reason for their unhappiness. The unemployment rate hovers around 9 percent nationally. Many homeowners owe more than their homes are worth. Foreclosures are rampant. And many young people – the key demographic of the protesters – can’t find jobs or live on their own. Alexandria, Va., resident Alice Dunlap said she was stunned at a 2009 family reunion to find that more than half of her four children and their spouses were out of work. “They all have college educations, and some have advanced degrees, and they’re unemployed?” says Dunlap, 62, a retired speech language pathologist. She supports the protests because, she says, anger lingers at those who profited while the nation’s economy tanked. “We all got ripped off by Wall Street, and we continue to be ripped off by Wall Street,” she says. “You can look at my portfolio, if you like.” The poll found that most protest supporters do not blame Obama for the economic crisis. Sixty-eight percent say former President George W. Bush deserves “almost all” or “a lot but not all” of the blame. Just 15 percent say Obama deserves that much blame. Nearly six in 10 protest supporters blame Republicans in Congress for the nation’s economic problems, and 21 percent blame congressional Democrats. Six in 10 protest supporters trust Democrats more than Republicans to create jobs. Most people who support the protests – like most people who don’t – actually report good financial situations in their own households. Still, protest supporters express more intense concern than non-supporters about unemployment at the moment and rising consumer prices in the coming year. Norton Shores, Mich., retiree Patsy Ellerbroek, 65, is among those who have little empathy for the Wall Street protesters. “Everybody ought to own their own business before they start complaining,” Ellerbroek says. Eight years ago, she and her husband sold “The Fun Spot,” a roller rink they owned for three decades. Now she’s a member of neither political party, and she gets frustrated when she sees politicians like the Republican candidates for president being disrespectful. Or Obama “flying around the county on our taxpayer dollars, politicking.” “With all the politicians, it’s like, the heck with the people who put them there. We need another Mr. Smith goes to Washington,” she said. The poll was conducted Oct. 13-17, 2011, by GfK Roper Public Affairs and Corporate Communications. It involved landline and cellphone interviews with 1,000 adults and had a margin of sampling error of plus or minus 4 percentage points. The poll included 384 respondents who said they were supporters of the Wall Street protests. Among that group, the error margin was 6.5 points. ___ Online:

Read the full article →

GE Q3 profit up 18% to USD2.34b

October 23, 2011

GE Q3 profit up 18% to USD2.34b

Read the full article →

Global events impact oil markets

October 23, 2011

Global events impact oil markets

Read the full article →

Asian Activities Report for October 24, 2011: Fairstar Resources (ASX:FAS) Secures A$300 Million Funding for Steeple Hill Iron Project

October 23, 2011

http://www.abnnewswire.net/rss2/menafn/abn_menafn_en.asp Fairstar Resources Limited (ASX:FAS) has secured conditional approval for a A$300 million debt instrument from international lenders for the …

Read the full article →

Black Range Minerals Limited (ASX:BLR) Completed Drilling Program at the Hansen Uranium Deposit

October 23, 2011

http://www.abnnewswire.net/rss2/menafn/abn_menafn_en.asp Black Range Minerals Limited (ASX:BLR) is pleased to advise that it has completed its inaugural drilling program at the Hansen and Picnic …

Read the full article →

Japan’s trade surplus widens in September alongside increasing exports 

October 23, 2011

Japan’s merchandise trade surplus unexpectedly expanded in September as exports continued to show significant improvements especially with the increasing demand in the Asian region. Japan’s exports …

Read the full article →

Eurozone agrees to release Greece’s 6th tranche of loans

October 23, 2011

(MENAFN) Eurozone finance ministers said in a statement that in a move that would keep Greece afloat for another few months, the ministers agreed to release the 6th tranche of the country’s bailout …

Read the full article →

German ‘occupation’

October 23, 2011

(MENAFN – Gulf Times) A demonstrator holds a protest sign at the ‘Occupy Kiel’ demonstration in Kiel, Germany. An alliance critical of the financial system called for the protest. …

Read the full article →

China’s domestic travel up 14.7% in Jan-Jun

October 23, 2011

(MENAFN) China’s National Tourism Administration (NTA) said that in 2011′s first six months, tourism in China’s western regions led the growth in the country’s domestic travels to 14.7 percent from …

Read the full article →

S&P estimates EU GDP growth at 1.1% next year

October 23, 2011

(MENAFN) Standard & Poor’s (S&P), the rating services firm, reported that Eurozone’s gross domestic product’s (GDP) growth for the next year would be expected at 1.1 percent compared with previous …

Read the full article →

S&P estimates EU GDP growth at 1.1% next year

October 23, 2011

(MENAFN) Standard & Poor’s (S&P), the rating services firm, reported that Eurozone’s gross domestic product’s (GDP) growth for the next year would be expected at 1.1 percent compared with previous …

Read the full article →

European crisis ‘will take time to resolve’

October 23, 2011

(MENAFN – Gulf Times) Reaching a short-term resolution to the European sovereign debt crisis still requires a large gap to be closed between divergent interests, QNB Capital has said in a report. …

Read the full article →

Google mulls bid for Yahoo!: report

October 23, 2011

(MENAFN – Youm7) Internet giant Google is mulling a bid for rival Yahoo! and has talked to at least two private-equity firms to consider how the deal would be financed, The Wall Street Journal …

Read the full article →

Official: EU banks have to raise $140 billion

October 23, 2011

(MENAFN – Youm7) A European official says the European Union’s finance chiefs are close to agreeing upon new rules that would force banks to raise just over €100 billion ($140 billion) in new …

Read the full article →

Coco for Europe

October 23, 2011

(MENAFN – Jordan Times) By Barry Eichengreen After a year and half of delay and denial, Greece is about to restructure its debts. This, by itself, will not be enough to draw a line under the …

Read the full article →

Coco for Europe

October 23, 2011

(MENAFN – Jordan Times) By Barry Eichengreen After a year and half of delay and denial, Greece is about to restructure its debts. This, by itself, will not be enough to draw a line under the …

Read the full article →

Eurozone plan

October 23, 2011

(MENAFN – Jordan Times) By Raghuram Rajan How will the eurozone crisis play out in the next few weeks? With luck, Italy may soon get a credible government of national unity, Spain will obtain a …

Read the full article →

US Maxim Integrated Products Q1 net income up 14%

October 23, 2011

(MENAFN) Maxim Integrated Products’ Inc. CEO, Tunc Doluca, said that in the first quarter, the US chip maker’s net income grew 14 percent reaching USD133 million, compared with USD118 million in …

Read the full article →

US Verizon Communications Q3 earnings up to USD1.38b

October 23, 2011

US Verizon Communications Q3 earnings up to USD1.38b

Read the full article →

Drunk US dad makes nine-year-old daughter drive

October 23, 2011

Drunk US dad makes nine-year-old daughter drive

Read the full article →

In Chile, an iPad for every lawmaker

October 23, 2011

In Chile, an iPad for every lawmaker

Read the full article →

Thief finally comes back from the dead

October 23, 2011

Thief finally comes back from the dead

Read the full article →

German ‘fortune cookies’ foretell euro’s future

October 23, 2011

German ‘fortune cookies’ foretell euro’s future

Read the full article →

House cat gets close look at mountain lion

October 23, 2011

House cat gets close look at mountain lion

Read the full article →

McDonald’s Q3 net income up by 9% to USD1.51b

October 23, 2011

McDonald’s Q3 net income up by 9% to USD1.51b

Read the full article →

US senator majority leader backs Obama’s Iraq decision

October 23, 2011

US senator majority leader backs Obama’s Iraq decision

Read the full article →

Michael G. Winston: On Wall Street Protestors

October 22, 2011

It is almost surreal. Concerns over Wall Street practices and economic inequality that have led to sit-ins and rallies in New York and elsewhere reverberated up to the White House last Thursday, with President Obama saying the protesters are expressing the frustrations of the American public. The president said he understood the public’s concerns about how the nation’s financial system works and said Americans see Wall Street as an example of the financial industry “not always following the rules.” True enough. However, only days earlier, these same Americans, who have been long-suffering victims, were the target of his criticism. President Obama recently told an Orlando television reporter that our country has “grown soft.” He also acknowledged that some “folks” have not been playing by “the rules.” Mr. President, the country has not “grown soft” and the issue is less about playing “by the rules” than it is about enforcing the law for those who do not. When people do not obey the law, whether rich or poor, it is expected that they will be held accountable. Securities fraud is a crime; insider trading is a crime; market manipulation is a crime. So, too, are perjury, obstruction of justice and witness tampering. It appears to many that what has “gone soft” is our Justice system. People are frustrated that the government appears to have more time, resources and interest in prosecuting professional athletes for alleged steroid use than white collar criminals causing cataclysmic financial setbacks to tens of millions of people. Not a single architect the financial crisis that has brought the U.S. to its knees has yet been charged. Americans wonder why not. Americans feel a sense of deep frustration and helplessness in the face of the mounting oppressive problems that the gasping economy and rudderless leadership in Congress have engendered. This growing public outcry shouldn’t be surprising at all. This is not new; it has been building for years. It has been exacerbated by a perceived inconsistent strategy, weak leadership and failed policies. Use the word “recovery” all you want; but Americans feel we have been in a recession for over three years. A year ago, former Medtronic CEO and current Harvard Professor, Bill George stated … The highly visible corporate leadership failures of recent years have deeply shaken public confidence in business leaders. All too often these leaders have placed self-interest ahead of the well-being of their organizations. After the companies got in trouble, their leaders then refused to take responsibility for the harm caused to the people they served. The problems at British Petroleum, Hewlett-Packard, and failed Wall Street firms, along with the actions of dozens of leaders who failed in the post-Enron era, are glaring examples of these lapses in leadership. Consequently, there has been a widespread and dramatic loss of trust in business and political leaders in the past decade. People are angry and suspicious. Can you blame them? This is almost all-pervasive. The Harvard Center for Public Leadership 2009 National Leadership Index revealed that 69 percent of those surveyed believe there is a leadership crisis in the U.S., with politicians, media, finance, and business leaders getting the lowest ratings. The same is true in Europe. This is even more the case in 2011. Very discouraging. What can we do to repair the visibly eroding standards of leadership? We must turn up the heat on our leaders. We must further turn the heat up on elected officials to uphold the law. Also, let’s hold ourselves to the highest exemplary standards. Not out of fear of legal consequences. And despite the most prominent examples to the contrary. First, we can strive to be role models of leadership that exude the following leadership qualities… • The vision to spell out clearly what we will do for those who depend upon us. • The drive to share that vision broadly with those who have the biggest stake in our success. • The courage to challenge the status quo, stimulate the change, and to make decisions that move us forward in even the most difficult times. • The ability to inspire people to action, individually and in teams, to achieve our goals. • The foresight to empower people to learn new skills and stretch their capabilities to higher levels of achievement. • The wisdom to listen, learn, and translate that knowledge into higher performance. • The willingness to recognize accomplishments and celebrate successes. • The integrity to serve as a good example through actions that consistently reinforce our basic values. Implementing a new strategy requires a leader who can drive an organization, energize its operations, and inspire its people. This kind of leader must personify the organization’s purpose, through values, thinking, and character – all necessary to inspire and energize commitment to the strategy and goals of the leader and to secure the allegiances required to make any bold purpose succeed. Clearly, an essential element of leadership is trust. High performance leaders and organizations believe that words and deeds should match and have the guts and intestinal fortitude to keep their promises through thick and thin, in good times and bad. It is in translating the commitment to consistent, purposeful action, often under fire (business downturn, budget crisis, etc.) that the true test of leadership is passed or failed. Without the requisite character and integrity, the organization is “built to fail” not “built to last.” According to the infamous Edward R. Murrow: To be persuasive, we must be believable; To be believable, we must be credible; To be credible, we must be truthful. Second, we can uphold the law and prosecute lawbreakers, including “white collar criminals”, no matter how highly placed or cozy with government officials. As highlighted in the 2011 Oscar award winning Documentary “Inside Job,” hundreds of billions of dollars have been lost by investors while millions of borrowers have lost their homes. Yet, none of the people who ran the institutions that contributed to the disaster have been found liable. If these people are not to be indicted for criminal fraud, then the Wall Street/ financial services leadership that recklessly crashed the economy must be breathing easier and celebrating their ill-gotten record gains. The world was brought to the brink by the American banking/mortgage system and thus far, no one has been held accountable. Why not? On my way to getting my Ph.D. in psychology, one of the most important principles I learned was the notion that what gets rewarded gets repeated. That which gets punished gets extinguished. If malfeasance and downright corruption are not punished, they will return and again shake our very foundations. We will never be able to get this behind us if we do not get full and complete investigations with accountability and punishment for the guilty parties. The banks and financial services companies that tanked the world economy got off with carefully orchestrated settlements. The companies paid small fines without even being required to admit wrongdoing. To add insult to injury, the people who actually committed the crimes almost never pay the fines themselves; banks caught defrauding their shareholders often use shareholder money to foot the tab of justice. This stands in striking contrast to the failure of many savings and loan institutions in the late 1980s. In the wake of that debacle, special government task forces referred 1,100 cases to prosecutors, resulting in more than 800 bank officials going to jail. Among the best-known: Charles H. Keating Jr. of Lincoln Savings and Loan in Arizona. So, 800 bank officials went to jail then, and zero have been incarcerated now, for malfeasance that is much larger, more damaging and more resistant to recovery. Many are explaining this by noting that a large sum of the President’s campaign contributions come from Wall Street. They wonder if Wall Street owns the Federal Government. Our elected and appointed officials must do their jobs, satisfy their commitment to transparency, responsibility and accountability. We must “keep the heat on.” In this way, justice may eventually be done. So many leaders have failed themselves, their families, their shareholders, and their neighbors on the most important of leadership behaviors…honesty, integrity and ethical decision-making. It is a national disgrace. We have lost our standing on the world stage. Let’s try to rid the world of companies that abuse shareholders, customers, employees and society. It is time for the “good guys” to win and the “bad guys” to lose. Americans will be just fine when they see that the system works.

Read the full article →

The World’s Most Stolen Food? Say Cheese

October 22, 2011

Move over Kobe beef and aged whiskey . It turns out cheese is the most stolen food in the world, says a recent global study. That’s the finding of a new report by the U.K.’s Center for Retail Research , which surveyed 1,187 retailers representing more than 250,000 retail outlets across 43 countries. The figures showed 4% of cheese went missing from store shelves. “The biggest threats for retailers are employees and shoplifters,” said Dr. Joshua Bamfield, Director of the Center for Retail Research in a phone interview with The Huffington Post. With the price of cheese rising, Bamfield says this is far from surprising given it could be seen as “a lucrative business opportunity for small time criminals.” “It’s not just grannies saying, I need some cheese I’ll just go and steal it. A lot of the theft is for resale and a lot of this cheese will be resold into other markets or to restaurants.” Other “high risk” foods to make the most stolen food list include fresh meat, chocolate, alcohol, seafood and infant formula. Though the National Retail Federation does a survey each year on retail crime in the U.S., it doesn’t track the most stolen goods and even found it unexpected to learn cheese topped the list. “Yes, I’m surprised. For a gut check I called one of the largest grocery chains in the U.S. and they were surprised as well,” said Joseph LaRocca from the National Retail Federation in an email to The Huffington Post. Instead, LaRocca expected a less lucrative item to trump cheese. “Every sector of retail has their ‘target items’….If I had to make a personal guess, it would be chewing gum,” LaRocca added. But it shouldn’t really come as that much of a surprise that cheese is that sought after. Remember the cheese thieves of Oregon, who stole $600 of gouda and blue cheese wheels ? Either way, theft is a growing concern for retailers, especially since the annual amount of stolen retail goods increased by 6.6% since June 2010. But theft also adds to the global average family grocery shopping bill by an extra $200. In the U.S., that figure was $435, noted the report.

Read the full article →