October 2011

Big Banks Still Raking In Billions From Overdraft Fees

October 21, 2011

Despite bank officials wailing about how financial reforms may hurt their bottom line, banks will rake in billions this year thanks to fees they’re charging consumers for overdrafting. Banks are slated to rake in $16 billion in overdraft fee revenue this year, according to Bloomberg Businessweek . That’s down 16 percent from their 2009 peak, in part because last summer the Federal Reserve began requiring banks to get customers’ permission to enroll in overdraft protection , instead of enrolling them automatically, according to USA Today . Even with the change, customers are still getting hit hard by the fees. The average overdraft fee remains $35, the same as it was last year , according to a survey from the Consumer Federation of America. The Center for Responsible Lending, a consumer advocacy group, accused banks earlier this year of engaging in marketing campaigns that inappropriately encouraged customers to opt into overdraft protection , according to AOL Daily Finance. The banks have been criticized and even faced lawsuits for their practices, including processing payments from largest to smallest, forcing the consumer to incur more fees, AOL Daily Finance reports. Bank of America paid $410 million to settle a federal lawsuit alleging that the bank charged excessive overdraft fees, earlier this year and Wells Fargo and Citibank have faced similar suits, according to Bloomberg. Big banks have more recently come under fire for upping fees on once-free checking account services. Bank of America roiled consumers after announcing that it would charge a $5 per month fee for debit card purchases starting in 2012. Wells Fargo is testing a $3 debit card fee and Citibank announced in August that it would start charging a fee on some customers for low account balances. Banking officials claim that they need to charge the fees in order to recoup lost revenue as a result of new financial reform regulations. Brian Moynihan, Bank of America’s CEO, publicly defended the debit card fee saying that the company has a “right to make a profit.” Profit it certainly did. Bank of America reported $6.2 billion gains in the third quarter compared to a $7.3 billion loss for the same quarter last year. Citigroup’s net income rose 74 percent to $3.8 billion in the third quarter. President Barack Obama has criticized the banks for boosting customer fees in an effort to rake in more money. In an interview with ABC News, Obama said that banks were mistreating their customers by charging the fees.

Read the full article →

Lydia Fisher: Financial Occupation

October 21, 2011

“Financial occupation” is what a Greek journalist said Greece was under. I suppose the journalist means, held hostage by world bankers. Wonder how many Americans feel the same, burdened by debt — be it underwater mortgages, student loans, or credit card debt, not to mention public debt. Greece, among other dire prospects, faces liquidation of national assets? Think about that — what’s left? Within an interconnected global financial system, a poke in any one part may bring the rest of the financial spider web down. What to do when a country is way overextended relative to its growth prospects? A Greek default would ripple through Eurozone banks to the U.S. banking system. No doubt, Greece mismanaged its affairs. Politicians overpromised, overspent. For a small country, the debt’s a staggering near half trillion , with no visible growth engine in sight to service the debt. No means to borrow in capital markets. Imagine one year Greek bonds way north of 100 percent! Greece, it’s people, are at the mercy of the world’s bankers, leaders — relying on loan “handouts,” just to pay its bills, if at all. It’s people are imprisoned in chains of debt. Some innocent and some not so innocent, now feel the brunt, as austerity pushes through the front doorstep. I came across this from a friend as it relates to the economic crisis — “culpability of few, responsibility of all.” All the more, the responsibility for vigilance in the face of the seemingly invisible that sooner or later manifests itself. We live in a world of financial warriors. They can take anyone hostage — through loans, through financial speculative attack like short selling raids, through credit default swapping. The empire building “Too Big to Fails,” even come to the rescue. With provisions and creative solutions — as in the case of Greece, to find transactional ways to defer debt into the future. Creativity or “kicking the can?” No wonder, headlines pulsate with financial misdeeds against humanity. The silver lining in the ongoing crisis is that it challenges the world — about the world being owned by few. Maybe we’ll get it all out there for a healthy dialogue and movement for economic justice, for work democracy for all people, for peace and harmony. What’s the real problem here at home? It’s obviously not political democracy. Is it the free market enterprise economic system? Or, is it those at the levers? It’s people who distort systems — when they lose their sense of ethics and morality. Two economic systems can start from two different premises (for example state-ownership or private ownership) and end up in the same place through human distortion of their theoretical principles. Take the former Soviet Union. The centrally planned, state-owned economy crumbled, under the weight of big government. As we look into the future, what’s the trade here? What kind of economic system have we morphed into when byzantine banks are bailed out, propped up, now partially owned by us? Are we growing a byzantine government bureaucracy that may crowd out private enterprise? What then of progress and freedom, our ability to shape our destiny? Well-being and self-esteem come with self-reliance, a sense of ownership and participation. It’s naturally human to be motivated when we have independence, fulfillment and a sense that we are advancing, have an opportunity to make not only a living wage, but a little more to treat ourselves and our families. It makes for a healthier, happier, society all in all. There are think tanks, consulting firms, eager Americans, already working, ready and able to help, to construct an economy that aspires to benefit all. It takes leadership and will. Concentration of wealth and power is a symptom of crony capitalism. Did we play by the rules of capitalism? There’s accountability already embedded in our economic system. Manage well, you succeed. Manage poorly, you fail. What happened to the notion of a level playing field allowing many to compete? What did we do? The proper role of government in a free-enterprise system is to police market participants at arm’s length, not join their ranks and choose winners and losers. That’s a line we crossed a long time ago… Think Bear Stearns, AIG, Lehman, Countrywide, to name a few, all the way back to the Fed-orchestrated bank bailout of Long-Term Capital Management in 1998. Without Washington enablers dismantling the boundaries and paving the road, the bankers would have been bridled, hemmed in (if they couldn’t regulate themselves in the first place). After all, the dismantling of Glass-Steagall unleashed the building of the “Too Big To Fails.” Will history look upon them as dinosaurs? Bigness, of course, brings wealth and power, and with power, more wealth for more power. No surprise, then, the income inequality and the rise of what some call a “plutocracy.” A former World War II French Resistance fighter, Stephane Hessel, has written a book titled Time For Outrage . Millions of copies sold worldwide. Hessel has this to say: “If you want to be a real human being — a real woman, a real man — you cannot tolerate things which put you to indignation, to outrage,” he says. “You must stand up. I always say to people, ‘Look around; look at what makes you unhappy, what makes you furious, and then engage yourself in some action.” Otherwise? Ask Greece.

Read the full article →

Golden Phoenix Appoints Capital Market Expert John Di Girolamo to Board of Directors

October 21, 2011

SPARKS, NV–(Marketwire – Oct 21, 2011) – Golden Phoenix Minerals, Inc. (the “Company”) ( OTCBB : GPXM ) is pleased to announce that on October 20 th , 2011, its Board of Directors appointed Mr. John Di Girolamo to the Company’s Board, effective immediately.

Read the full article →

After Tough Alabama Law, Few Americans Taking Immigrants Work

October 21, 2011

ONEONTA, Ala. — Potato farmer Keith Smith saw most of his immigrant workers leave after Alabama’s tough immigration law took effect, so he hired Americans. It hasn’t worked out: Most show up late, work slower than seasoned farm hands and are ready to call it a day after lunch or by midafternoon. Some quit after a single day. In Alabama and other parts of the country, farmers must look beyond the nation’s borders for labor because many Americans simply don’t want the backbreaking, low-paying jobs immigrants are willing to take. Politicians who support the law say over time more unemployed Americans will fill these jobs. They insist it’s too early to consider the law a failure, yet numbers from the governor’s office show only nominal interest. “I’ve had people calling me wanting to work,” Smith said. “I haven’t turned any of them down, but they’re not any good. It’s hard work, they just don’t work like the Hispanics with experience.” Alabama passed its law in June and it was immediately challenged by the Obama administration as it has been in other states. Unlike those states’ measures, Alabama’s law was left largely in place while challenges played out in court, frightening Hispanics and driving many of them away. The agriculture industry suffered the most immediate impact. Farmers said they will have to downsize or let crops die on the vine. As the season’s harvest winds down, many are worried about next year. In south Georgia, Connie Horner has heard just about every reason unemployed Americans don’t want to work on her blueberry farm. It’s hot, the hours are long, the pay isn’t enough and it’s just plain hard. “You can’t find legal workers,” Horner said. “Basically they last a day or two, literally.” Horner, who runs an 8 1/2-acre organic blueberry farm, said she tried to use the government’s visa program to hire foreign workers, but it was too costly and time consuming. She plans to stop growing organically and start using a machine to pick the berries. “I did everything I possibly could to be legal and honest and not part of the problem,” Horner said. “Morally, I can’t knowingly hire illegal workers.” Gov. Robert Bentley, a Republican who signed the law, started a program last week to help businesses, particularly farmers, make up for the lost labor. So far, about 260 people interested in temporary agricultural jobs have signed up. About three dozen job openings have been posted, said Tara Hutchison, a spokeswoman for the Alabama Department of Industrial Relations. She said the department doesn’t know of anyone who has been hired. Sen. Scott Beason, a Republican, said he has received several emails and phone calls from people thanking him for helping them get jobs. He described one getting promoted from a part-time job with no benefits to a full-time job with benefits because some other immigrant workers left. He said none of the workers who thanked him have wanted to talk to the media. “They are paranoid of publicity. They are like, `I don’t want to get shredded up like y’all are.’ … I really can’t blame them,” he said. Over the past two weeks, The Associated Press has reached out to the governor’s office and other officials to provide the names of Alabama residents who have taken immigrant jobs. Either they were not made available, or didn’t want to speak publicly. Brent Martin, an Alabama resident, started working on a tomato farm in an area northeast of Birmingham after the law was passed. On Thursday, he and two other Americans were clearing about 24,000 tomato stakes off a 4-acre plot. He said few Americans who would stick with it. “There are plenty who could do it, but would they? I don’t know about that. I don’t see why they wouldn’t as bad as the economy is right now,” Martin said. Relatively high unemployment rates – about 9 percent in the U.S. and 9.9 in Alabama – are not likely to push Americans toward farm work, said Demetrios Papademetriou, president and co-founder of the Migration Policy Institute. He suggested the problem may be more deeply rooted. “This is a sector and an industry … that a long time ago, going back to the 1940s and probably before that was abandoned,” Papademetriou said. “It was abandoned to foreign workers.” Stan Eury, executive director of the North Carolina Growers Association, said location matters, too. “Agriculture jobs are primarily in remote, rural areas. We see higher numbers of unemployed people in the big cities,” he said. Tomato farmer Wayne Smith said he has never been able to keep a staff of American workers in his 25 years of farming. “People in Alabama are not going to do this,” said Smith, who grows about 75 acres of tomatoes in the northeast part of the state. “They’d work one day and then just wouldn’t show up again.” At his farm, field workers get $2 for every 25-pound box of tomatoes they fill. Skilled pickers can make anywhere from $200 to $300 a day, he said. Unskilled workers make much less. A crew of four Hispanics can earn about $150 each by picking 250-300 boxes of tomatoes in a day, said Jerry Spencer, of Grow Alabama, which purchases and sells locally owned produce. A crew of 25 Americans recently picked 200 boxes – giving them each $24 for the day. It may make sense for some to sit on the couch. Unemployment benefits provide up to $265 a week while a minimum wage job, at $7.25 an hour for 40 hours, brings in $290. Spencer said the Americans he has linked up with farmers are not physically fit and do not work fast enough. “It’s the harshest work you can imagine doing,” Spencer said. ___ Caldwell reported from Washington. Phillip Rawls in Montgomery also contributed to this report.

Read the full article →

Senate Rejects Slimmed-Down Jobs Bill Aimed At Helping Teachers, First Responders

October 21, 2011

WASHINGTON — Despite a campaign-style push this week by President Barack Obama, the Senate on Thursday scuttled pared-back jobs legislation aimed at helping state and local governments avoid layoffs of teachers and firefighters. Obama’s three-day bus tour through North Carolina and Virginia – states crucial to his re-election race next year – didn’t change any minds among Senate Republicans, who filibustered Obama’s latest jobs measure to death just as they killed his broader $447 billion jobs plan last week. The 50-50 vote came in relation to a motion to simply take up the bill. Some Democrats who voted with the president, like Sen. Joe Manchin of West Virginia and Jon Tester of Montana, however, said they couldn’t support the underlying Obama plan unless it’s changed. Thursday’s $35 billion measure combined $30 billion for state and local governments to hire teachers and other school workers with $5 billion to help pay the salaries of police officers, firefighters and other first responders. The White House says the measure would “support” almost 400,000 education jobs for one year. Republicans call that a temporary “sugar high” for the economy. Despite the negative vote, Obama and his Democratic allies are acting like they’ve found a winning issue in repeatedly pressing popular ideas such as infrastructure spending and boosting hiring of police officers and firefighters. The sluggish economy and lower tax revenues have caused many teachers’ jobs to be cut over the past several years. “In the coming school year, many school districts will have to make another round of difficult decisions that will cost jobs and put the education of the nation’s children at risk,” a White House policy statement said. After the failure of the jobs measure last week, Democrats vowed to try to resurrect it on a piece by piece basis, even though the strategy doesn’t seem to have any better chance of success. But Democrats are trying to win a political advantage through repeated votes. They’re also pressing for passage of a poll-tested financing mechanism – a surcharge on income exceeding $1 million. An AP-GfK poll taken Oct. 13-17 found 62 percent of respondents favoring the surcharge as a way to pay for jobs initiatives. Just 26 percent opposed the idea. Republicans say the president is more interested in picking political fights with them than seeking compromise. Still, they don’t seem to be afraid of a politically weakened Obama. Not a single Republican backed the president in last week’s vote “The fact is we’re not going to get this economy going again by growing the government. It’s the private sector that’s ultimately going to drive this recovery,” Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., said. “Look, if big government were the key to economic growth, then countries like Greece would be booming right now.” At the same time, several Democrats opposed the underlying measure, even though they voted in favor of at least allowing debate to begin. “This bill fails to give taxpayers any guarantee that this money would actually be used to hire teachers and invest in our schools,” Tester said. “States would get loads of money with little guidance that they spend the money on teachers.” And Joe Lieberman, I-Conn., said the stimulus-style jobs bill spends money the country doesn’t have and takes revenues away from a special “supercommittee” charged with cutting the deficit by at least $1.2 trillion over the coming decade. According to the AP-GfK poll, Obama’s party has lost the faith of the public on handling the economy. In the new poll, only 38 percent said they trust Democrats to do a better job than Republicans in handling the economy, the first time Democrats have fallen below 40 percent in the poll. Some 43 percent trust the Republicans more. White House Press Secretary Jay Carney, speaking the day after Obama returned from bus tour, said the president’s plan has the advantage of providing an immediate kick to the economy. “The Republicans don’t have proposals that would help the economy grow or help it create jobs now,” Carney said. “That’s the comparison.” Republicans want to roll back government regulations that they say choke job growth. They backed free-trade pacts with South Korea, Colombia and Panama that were ratified this month. They also back extending tax breaks for businesses that buy new equipment and favor offering a $4,800 tax credit to companies that hire veterans. Democrats and the White House, meanwhile, are confident that other elements of Obama’s larger jobs bill, including extending cuts in Social Security payroll taxes, will pass. A 2 percentage point payroll tax cut enacted last year expires at the end of the year. Obama has proposed cutting it by an additional percentage point and extending the cut to the first $5 million of a company’s payroll.

Read the full article →

Senate Approves Obama’s Nominee For Commerce Department

October 21, 2011

WASHINGTON — The Senate voted Thursday to approve President Barack Obama’s nomination of former utility executive John Bryson to head the Commerce Department, easily overcoming conservatives’ objections that his pro-environmental views made him unsuited for the job. The chamber’s 74-26 vote came five months after Obama chose the former head of Edison International, the holding company that owns Southern California Edison, to head the agency. Bryson has also served on boards of major corporations including the Boeing Co. and the Walt Disney Co. Twenty-one Republicans joined all 51 Democrats and two independents in backing Bryson, while 26 Republicans voted no. Bryson’s nomination had become entangled in the dispute between Obama and Republicans over free trade agreements with South Korea, Colombia and Panama when some GOP lawmakers said they would block his approval until the president sent those pacts to Congress. The House and Senate approved those pacts last week. Since Obama announced his choice of Bryson, unemployment has been stuck at around 9.1 percent and the public mood about the economy has been gloomy – a dangerous combination for the president and his party with Election Day for control of the White House and Congress barely more than a year off. “At such a critical time for our economy, I nominated John because I believe his decades of experience both in the public and private sector have given him a clear understanding of what it takes to put America on a stronger economic footing and create jobs,” Obama said in a written statement after the vote. “I’m confident he will help us do that.” Bryson, 68, was a co-founder four decades ago of the Natural Resources Defense Council and has supported cap-and-trade legislation, which would set an overall cap on pollution and allow companies to buy and sell the right to produce emissions. Many conservatives oppose the proposal, saying it adds costs to businesses. The selection of Bryson shows that Obama “has no intention of backing down on his job-killing war on affordable energy,” said Sen. James Inhofe, R-Okla., one of Bryson’s fiercest opponents. Inhofe called the Natural Resources Defense Council “one of the most radical, left-wing, extreme environmental groups.” Bryson won solid backing from Democrats like Sen. Jay Rockefeller, D-W.Va., who praised his business background at a time of 9.1 percent unemployment and said, “We need all the good people we can get.” Bryson also won support from some more moderate Republicans like John McCain of Arizona, whom Obama defeated in the 2008 presidential race. “Elections do have consequences,” said McCain. He said he wouldn’t have nominated Bryson, but said senators should not block presidents from appointing top cabinet officials except for rare occasions “when that individual is not fit to serve.” “I don’t think you could really question Mr. Bryson’s credentials and background,” McCain said. Bryson was supported by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the National Association of Manufacturers, which applauded his business background. He will succeed Gary Locke, who left to become ambassador to China.

Read the full article →

US Union Pacific Q3 profit grows 16%

October 21, 2011

US Union Pacific Q3 profit grows 16%

Read the full article →

Bridgestone plans to boost tires output

October 21, 2011

Bridgestone plans to boost tires output

Read the full article →

Swedish Scania posts USD350m profits in Q3

October 21, 2011

Swedish Scania posts USD350m profits in Q3

Read the full article →

Nokia narrows losses in Q3 to USD94m

October 21, 2011

Nokia narrows losses in Q3 to USD94m

Read the full article →

Germany lowers growth forecast for 2012

October 21, 2011

Germany lowers growth forecast for 2012

Read the full article →

Microsoft Q1 net income up 6% to USD5.7b

October 21, 2011

Microsoft Q1 net income up 6% to USD5.7b

Read the full article →

Fed’s Tarullo: Housing ‘Continues To Hang Like An Albatross’ On Economy

October 20, 2011

NEW YORK (Reuters) – The Federal Reserve should consider buying more mortgage bonds to support a fragile economic recovery and a downtrodden housing sector, Fed Board Governor Daniel Tarullo said on Thursday. In his first speech explicitly on the economic outlook since joining office in 2009, Tarullo, who tends to focus primarily on regulation, argued vehemently that more should be done to address the country’s jobless crisis. Because the ongoing rut in housing is so central to the recession and the anemic nature of the subsequent expansion, the Fed should refocus its efforts on housing, he said. “I believe we should move back up toward the top of the list of options the large-scale purchase of additional mortgage-backed securities,” Tarullo said in text prepared for deliver at a conference at Columbia University. “There is need, and ample room, for additional measures to increase aggregate demand in the near to medium term, particularly in light of the limited upside risks to inflation over the medium term.” The Fed’s earlier interventions in the mortgage bond market, which totaled a whopping $1.25 trillion, were controversial, with some top policy makers saying they were leery of engaging in what potentially constituted allocating credit to a specific sector of the economy. Tarullo downplayed such concerns, arguing that putting the economic expansion on a more solid footing was the more pressing issue. “Housing continues to hang like an albatross around the necks of homeowners and the economy as a whole,” he said. He suggested lawmakers should also be thinking about ways to stimulate growth, but said Fed actions should be independent of fiscal policy considerations. “I certainly do not disagree that well-conceived policies by other parts of the government could produce gains in employment, investment, and spending. But the absence of such policies cannot be an excuse for the Federal Reserve to ignore its own statutory mandate,” he said, referring to the central bank’s dual mandate for price stability and maximum sustainable employment. Despite the Fed’s extraordinary efforts to stimulate the economy through highly accommodative monetary policy, the U.S. economy grew less than 1 percent in the first half of the year. Unemployment has remained stuck at 9.1 percent for several months, and Tarullo argued that even that startling figure understates the sorry state of affairs. “Nearly 30 million Americans … are officially unemployed, out of the labor force but wanting jobs, or involuntarily working only part time,” Tarullo said. The notion that U.S. unemployment was permanently higher due to “structural” issues is misguided, he said, saying that less than a quarter of the recent spike in joblessness can be accounted for by such factors as skills mismatches and difficulties in relocating. (Reporting by Kristina Cooke; Writing by Pedro Nicolaci da Costa; Editing by Leslie Adler) Copyright 2011 Thomson Reuters. Click for Restrictions .

Read the full article →

Dorie Clark: How to Market Your Social Marketing Campaign

October 20, 2011

It’s easy for social marketers to assume that promotion is all they need. After all, who disagrees with energy efficiency? Who thinks driving drunk is a great idea? Who would argue that kids should start smoking? But alas, most advocates won’t ever get the chance to test drive a $100 million advertising campaign — and the sad truth is, even if they did, it would almost certainly fail. That’s because if all it took to change behavior was hearing a message, then we’d have world peace. But there are plenty of people who know they shouldn’t eat that donut, or get into that car, or light up that cigarette, but they do it anyway. Behavior change takes a lot more than promotion. In other posts, I’ve discussed how to avoid the most common mistakes in developing a social marketing campaign. Here, I’ll talk about how social marketers can use the legendary “Four Ps” of marketing — product, price, place, and promotion — to get the maximum impact from their campaign. Product According to famed Harvard marketing professor Theodore Levitt, “People don’t want to buy a quarter-inch drill. They want a quarter-inch hole!” It’s too easy for social marketers to get caught up in the most literal definition of product — the shower placards that remind women to do breast self-exams, or energy-efficient lightbulbs that get handed out. That’s great, but far more relevant is what’s called the “core product” — the benefit you’re selling. In business, we often say no one cares about how powerful your blender is — until you explain how many margaritas you can make and how you’ll be the hit of the party. People often aren’t convinced to take action until you paint a compelling picture for them. Being respected, living a green lifestyle, standing up for energy independence — those are all-powerful “products” to sell, compared to the lightbulb or building renovation you might have thought you were selling. Price If things are free or very cheap, people will take action — right? Well, it’s not quite that simple. Pricing is actually rather complex when it comes to social marketing, but it means you have a lot of tools at your disposal. Most simply, you can reduce the price of an item you’d like people to adopt — witness the cornucopia of coupons for compact fluorescent lightbulbs a while back — or give people bonuses for good behavior. You can also (with the help of government or other decision makers) increase the cost of things you’re prefer people stay away from, such as a pack of cigarettes (which, where I live, now costs about the price of a movie ticket). Additionally, there are non-monetary benefits (or costs) you can think about leveraging. Want people to drive more hybrids? Give them a special parking space right by the door. Want more businesses to upgrade the energy efficiency of their buildings? Have the mayor hold a press conference praising their good citizenship. On the cost side, smokers are often subject to great inconvenience, forced to stand 20 or 30 feet away from the entrance of a building, even in inclement weather, if they choose to indulge their habit. Place Place is often overlooked in marketing — but its effects can be profound. Netflix killed the video store industry by providing DVDs by mail (and now via streaming video). Apple revolutionized checkouts by having their sales clerks handle the transaction with portable devices, rather than forcing customers to stand in line at the register. Similarly, think about ways you can leverage place to enhance your social marketing campaign. If something has typically been done in person, can you do it by mail or online — or vice versa? If hours or days of operation have typically been limited, can you extend them to be more accessible to your target audience? Can you employ existing distribution channels (financial advice through barber shops) or make your location more appealing (because a health clinic is scary enough without looking cold and sterile)? Promotion And finally, there’s promotion. Two key questions you’ll want to answer are what channels you should use to communicate, and when you should do it. Mass media — TV, newspaper ads, radio — is the first thing that comes to mind for many people. But, depending on your target audience, it could be a big waste of money. If you’re doing a campaign aimed at small business owners in a particular city, you don’t need to buy a Super Bowl ad that will reach them — and every other person in America. Instead, focus on selective channels like direct mail or online advertising, or — perhaps even better — use interpersonal efforts to create face-to-face meetings or workshops. Don’t kill the mosquito with a sledgehammer; to conserve your marketing budget and attain maximum impact, speak as directly as possible to your narrow target audience. Finally, think carefully about what they read and listen to, and when they do it. A little early market research can help you determine, for instance, whether your business owners are more likely to read emails during the workday (when they’re at their desk) or on weekends (when they have a little more time to catch up). If you’re launching a Bike-to-Work campaign, you might not want to do it in December, and if you want retail businesses to conduct energy efficiency upgrades, you might want to lay off during the week before Christmas. Too many social marketers assume the right tagline or a big billboard campaign will solve all their problems. You know better. Leveraging all “Four Ps” will help ensure your social marketing campaign makes a real difference. Dorie Clark is CEO of Clark Strategic Communications and a frequent collaborator with the energy efficiency consulting firm Serrafix . Clark is the author of the forthcoming “What’s Next?: The Art of Reinventing Your Personal Brand” (Harvard Business Review Press, 2012). She has taught social marketing at Tufts University, and has consulted for clients including Google, Yale University, and the National Park Service. Listen to her podcasts or follow her on Twitter .

Read the full article →

Nigel Barber: Wall Street Protesters Have a Point: Inequality

October 20, 2011

Occupy Wall Street protesters may have a diffuse agenda for change but they are upset about the same problem — unequal distribution of income that is dragging our society down. In a land of plenty, such as the U.S., one might reasonably expect that citizens would be happy and healthy, that they might work hard and enjoy social mobility. This is the American Dream. Yet, if a person wanted to realize the American Dream, they might consider doing it in Finland, Sweden, or even Japan. The very worst place for the American Dream is America itself. This conclusion leaps from the pages of The Spirit Level by Richard Wilkinson and Kate Pickett (1). Their main point is that high levels of income inequality detract from the quality of life for all residents of a country, even the privileged elite. Inequality is stressful and undermines trust. Wilkinson and Pickett compiled an index of health and social problems for the wealthiest countries in the world. They included: Life expectancy and infant mortality Obesity Mental illness Teenage births Imprisonment rates Homicides Level of trust Children’s educational performance Social mobility When they graphed the Index of Health and Social Problems against income inequality, the found that more unequal countries did worse on every criterion. This means that if a country has very unequal distribution of income, you can be sure that it also has severe problems with health, crime, education, and, yes, social mobility. The countries with the best quality of life (and lowest religiosity ) are Japan, Sweden, Norway, the Netherlands, Switzerland and Finland. Dead last in their sample of 21 wealthy democratic countries was the U.S., followed by Portugal and the U.K. Social problems of all kinds follow from inequality. One simple measure of inequality is the ratio of income of the top 20% compared to the bottom 20% of the population. In Japan and Scandinavia, a typical ratio is that the richest fifth are four times better off than the poorest quintile. For Portugal and the U.S, the ratio is around 8, meaning that inequality is twice as great. Wilkinson and Pickett make a compelling case that inequality has a destructive impact on many aspects of the quality of life. But why is this? Why inequality is so socially corrosive Interesting as the connection between social problems and inequality is, the likely underlying mechanisms are quite fascinating. Wilkinson and Pickett argue that in more unequal societies, there is greater anxiety about social evaluation. They state: Greater inequality seems to heighten people’s social evaluation anxieties by increasing the importance of social status. Instead of accepting each other as equals on the basis of our common humanity as we might in more equal settings, getting the measure of others becomes more important as status differences widen. We come to see social position as a more important feature of a person’s identity. Between strangers, it may often be the dominant feature. (p. 43) Along with increased anxiety levels, more unequal societies undermine social trust and generate high levels of crime, violence, and mental illness and lose their effectiveness in education. Who can deny that we suffer more from these problems today than in earlier times, when this was a more egalitarian society having better opportunities for social mobility. Highly unequal societies become dysfunctional. Wilkinson and Pickett highlight the response to Hurricane Katrina where state troopers strapped on weapons to shoot looters instead of rescuing people from roofs. One could point to many other symptoms from crumbling antiquated infrastructure to a government incapable of simple tasks such as funding its own activities. In contrast, the health and happiness we associate with the American Dream are more typical of contemporary Japan and Scandinavia. The protesters may be short on solutions but they deserve credit for nailing the problem — unbridled greed at the top making life unbearable for everyone. 1. Wilkinson, R., & Pickett, K. (2010). The spirit level: Why greater equality makes societies stronger. New York: Bloomsbury Press .

Read the full article →

Poverty Rates Swelled In Almost All U.S. States, Cities In 2010

October 20, 2011

The ranks of the poor rose in almost all U.S. states and cities in 2010, despite the end of the longest and deepest economic downturn since the Great Depression the year before, U.S. Census data released on Thursday showed. Mississippi and New Mexico had the highest poverty rates, with more than one out of every five people in each state living in poverty. Mississippi’s poverty rate led, at 22.4 percent, followed by New Mexico at 20.4 percent. New Hampshire had the lowest poverty rate, at 8.3 percent, making it the only state with a poverty rate below 10 percent. Twelve states had poverty rates above 17 percent, up from five in 2009, while poverty rates in 10 metropolitan areas topped 18 percent, the data showed. “We saw the recession hit and unemployment increase, but we haven’t seen a dramatic drop in unemployment,” said Elizabeth Kneebone, a senior research associate focusing on metropolitan issues at the Brookings Institution. “Because we’re still in this weak recovery, we could see these numbers get worse before they get better,” she added. The U.S. recession that began in 2007 took a steep toll across the country, sparing only a few places from rising joblessness and crashing incomes. More than a year after the recession officially ended in 2009, the U.S. unemployment rate remains above 9 percent; the poverty rate rose to 15.3 percent in 2010 from 14.3 percent in 2009. “No state had a statistically significant decline in either the number of people in poverty or the poverty rate between 2009 and 2010.” the Census reported. Kneebone, of the Brookings Institution, noted that many of the big increases in the poverty rate in the first year of the recession were centered in the inner-mountain west and the Sunbelt. “As the recession deepened and spread to other industries, other regions of the country also saw their numbers increase,” she said, noting that areas reliant on manufacturing had not fully recovered from a downturn earlier in the decade when the recession struck. The depth of poverty levels increased in 2010, with 6.8 percent of people having incomes that were no more than half of the federal government’s official poverty threshold. That was up from 6.3 percent in 2009. Poverty ran deepest in Washington, D.C., where one in 10 people had incomes less than 50 percent the threshold. The Census also looked at the 366 metropolitan areas that account for more than 80 percent of the U.S. population. The Texas region defined by the cities of McAllen, Edinburg and Mission had the highest poverty rate in the country — 33.4 percent. It was followed the Fresno, California, area at 26.8 percent. Poverty rates topped 18 percent in metropolitan areas centered around El Paso, Texas; the cities of Bakersfield, Modesto and Stockton in California; Augusta, Georgia; Memphis, Tennessee; and both Durham and Greensboro in North Carolina as economic problems spread from core urban areas to the suburbs over the decade. “Many communities are facing this challenge in a magnitude they’ve never had to deal with before,” said Kneebone, who said there are now 2.7 million more people in suburbs than cities. Despite the deep poverty levels in the District of Columbia, the nation’s capital, the Washington, D.C., metropolitan area had the lowest poverty rate in the nation, at 8.4 percent, due to its wealthier suburbs. Honolulu had the second lowest, 9.1 percent. The numbers of people collecting food stamps and relying on Medicaid, the government healthcare program for the poor, skyrocketed in recent years. The Census also found that in 2010 more people collected other forms of public assistance than in 2009. In 2010, 3.3 million people received public assistance at some time in the year, an increase of 300,000 from 2009. Among U.S. households, about 2.9 percent received public assistance in 2010, up from 2.7 percent in 2009. The states with the highest public assistance participation included Alaska, Maine, Vermont and Washington. The states with the lowest rates were Louisiana, Alabama and Wyoming. Although Alaska and Maryland had poverty rates of 9.9 percent in 2010, the margins of error for those states were greater than 0.3 percent. (Editing by Leslie Adler) Copyright 2011 Thomson Reuters. Click for Restrictions .

Read the full article →

Josh Downes And David Cooper, Keyport: 27 Million And Counting

October 20, 2011

Starting your own business is a noble — not to mention exciting, rewarding and often crazy — undertaking. The experience is an adventure, to say the least, and no two entrepreneurial paths are exactly the same, whether they result in fame and fortune or just a few hard knocks. There are an estimated 27 million small businesses in the United States. And 27 Million and Counting is our attempt to capture as many of these unique, only-in-America success stories as we can. The premise is simple — we give entrepreneurs 60 seconds to share their stories, in their own words. We hope they will inspire, inform and maybe make you laugh. This is Josh and David’s story. Name: Josh Downes and David Cooper Company: Keyport Location: Henderson, Nev. Website: www.mykeyport.com WATCH:

Read the full article →

David Isenberg: Bad Pennies and Louis Berger Group

October 20, 2011

Who says the U.S. government doesn’t have a sense of humor, not to mention irony? Proof that it does can be seen in a recent, if little noted contract awarded to the Louis Berger Group, which is an international consulting firm of approximately 3,000 employees around the world who provide diverse multidisciplinary expertise including engineering, program and construction management and economic development services. LB is not a small fish in the private military contracting pond. The recent final report ( PDF ) of the Commission on Wartime Contracting in Iraq and Afghanistan identified it as one of 22 individually identifiable contractors that received at least a billion dollars each and account for 52 percent of contract awards from FY 2002 to FY 2011. Louis Berger is also well known for problems executing past contracts. For example, According to Slate , in November 2010, the Louis Berger Group agreed to a $69 million settlement after allegedly overcharging USAID by $15 million to $20 million over 10 years for development projects in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Sudan. Two former executives went to prison for fraud. Yet the settlement allowed the company to continue to working on government contracts. This was despite a 2009 report by USAID’s inspector general that ” urged USAID to make more use of its powers to suspend (cut off funds to an organization temporarily) and debar (cut them off permanently). ” However, that was then and this is now. And like a bad penny, Louis Berger Group keeps turning up to get new contracts. Or perhaps the government simply considers it to be one of those corporations that are too big to fail. Anyway, the contract was awarded by the Department of Justice’s Justice Management Division. The contract is to support Division’s Office of Overseas Prosecutorial Development, Assistance and Training (OPDAT). Contractor personnel will furnish administrative, logistical, professional, and technical labor, supplies, equipment, facilities, and materials necessary to perform the required functions consistent with applicable policies, regulations, procedures, business practices, and protocols that define the OPDAT operational environment. … On September 29, 2011, ContractDJJ12-C-2242 was awarded to The Louis Berger Group (Louis Berger), 250 23rdStreet, NW, Washington, DC, 20037 This contract will provide worldwide support services for the Office of Overseas Prosecutorial Development, Assistance and Training(OPDAT) of the U.S. Department of Justice’s Criminal Division. The contract includes a base period of performance of one year with four additional periods of one year each for a total period of performance of five years. Total value of the contract is $41,895,464. Of course, on the premise that you need a criminal to help fight criminality, who better than a corporation that has actually been prosecuted for fraud to help future prosecutions?

Read the full article →

Curtis Arnold: Best Credit Cards If Your Credit Is in the Doghouse

October 20, 2011

As the fallout from the 2008 financial crisis spread to credit card issuers in 2010, as many as 11 in 100 credit card accounts fell so far behind that banks charged them off as noncollectable . Though that ratio has dropped by half since then, you may be one of the many consumers who now face rebuilding your credit with tarnished credit reports. According to the Federal Reserve, your credit report can impact more areas of your life than just whether you can pay for your next online shopping order with a credit card: Insurance companies use credit scores to assess risk and set rates. Some actuaries believe that consumers with bad credit might destroy their property to escape car loans or home loans. Employers review credit reports to determine trustworthiness of job applicants. If your career involves handling cash, credit card numbers or customer information, your employers want to reduce the risk that a new hire will steal to cover their debts. Telephone, cable and other utility companies use credit scores to determine new service deposits. If your credit history is doubtful, ordering a new cell phone or a cable box could cost you extra setup fees and higher deposits. Landlords use credit scores to rank potential tenants. Because credit reports omit personal details like race and age, landlords can legally use them to select applicants they feel will pay the rent on time while causing the least property damage. Secured credit cards boost your credit score by building trust with new lenders. You’re putting your own money on the line, leaving hundreds or thousands of dollars on deposit in a savings account you can’t touch. “Churn” some routine expenses on your card and revolve up to about a third of your credit line to get the biggest impact on your credit report. Fail to make monthly payments or exceed your limit, and the deal’s off. Unlike instant approval credit cards , secured credit cards require additional scrutiny by loan officers and can take up to four weeks for approval. Banks use the time frame as a filter: if you can get by without your deposit for the better part of a month, they can see that you have the cash flow to properly rebuild your credit. We can suggest five sources for secured credit cards that won’t rip you off: Capital One Secured MasterCard If your credit isn’t at rock bottom, Capital One may offer you a credit line greater than the amount of your initial deposit. Making this card’s 22.9 percent APR pay off requires leaving the unsecured portion of your credit line untouched. When the bank reports your low credit utilization and your on-time payments to the credit bureaus, you’ll enjoy a slight lift in your credit score. Maintain your good habits over time, and Capital One may even graduate you to one of its cash back rewards cards. Orchard Bank Classic MasterCard and Classic Visa If you can afford to park a larger deposit with this division of HSBC (which is being acquired by Capital One), you’ll benefit from a better credit utilization percentage. Orchard waives the first year of its $35 annual fee for new customers while offering a 7.90 percent APR on purchases. A cash advance APR of nearly 21 percent means you’ll need to deposit money you won’t need to touch for a while to get the most from this card. Citi Secured Card Citi has rolled out one of the industry’s most aggressive fraud prevention systems, and it’s included in this $29 annual fee secured credit card. Make 18 months of consistent payments and you could be considered for one of Citi’s unsecured cards. At this writing, the variable interest rate on the Citi Secured Card hovers at just above 18 percent. First Progress Platinum Secured MasterCard Synovus Bank’s exposure to subprime credit card debt during the financial crisis forced it to launch two new brands: the familiar Green Dot prepaid debit card and the new First Progress secured credit card. Of the two, only the First Progress card reports customer activity to all three credit bureaus. At this time, Synovus markets First Progress with a $39 annual fee and an APR below 15 percent. Your local credit union As member-owned, non-profit organizations, credit unions offer some of the best terms on secured credit cards. For instance, Navy Federal Credit Union offers a version of its nRewards credit card with no annual fee, an APR under 9 percent, and up to 1 percent cash back on purchases. Teachers Federal Credit Union offers a no-fee secured credit card with an APR below 7 percent. If you’re not a teacher or a Navy veteran, your local credit union may offer similar terms. However, you may have to commit to attending a money management seminar and to bringing your other financial accounts into your credit union membership. Desperate for credit? Here’s a final word of caution. Our website about the best credit cards on the market often attracts questions from consumers in trouble with their credit. According to Amber Stubbs, managing editor for CardRatings.com, these questions often indicate a serious money problem that a new account isn’t likely to solve. Secured credit cards won’t magically improve your credit score overnight, and they won’t get you instant cash. To enjoy the real benefits of credit cards, you’ll need to keep your secured account in good standing for a year or two. Commit to earning and saving more money, so you can control your credit cards instead of letting them control you. Important Note! The information in this article is believed to be accurate as of the date it was written. Please keep in mind that credit card offers change frequently. Therefore, we can not guarantee the accuracy of the information in this article. Please verify all terms and conditions of any credit card prior to applying. The original article can be found at CardRatings.com : ” Best credit cards if your credit is in the doghouse ”

Read the full article →

WATCH: Donald Trump On Gaddafi’s Death: ‘Big Deal’

October 20, 2011

Hearing the news of Muammar Gaddafi’s death on Thursday, many American leaders released statements on what the end of the Libyan dictator’s run meant for the world. “The dark shadow of tyranny has been lifted,” said President Barack Obama. “I think people across the world recognize that the world is a better place without Muammar Gaddafi,” said Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney. But businessman Donald Trump? He needed only two words: “Big deal.” After hearing of the death , Trump, the business magnate perhaps best known for his role on the NBC reality show The Apprentice , took to his webcam for an installment of “From The Desk Of Donald Trump” to discuss the political ramification ( h/t Mogulite ). Trump, who’s recently been labeled the “GOP kingmaker” by the Boston Globe , quickly launches into a criticism of the Obama administration’s decision-making during the Libyan uprising, specifically that the president should have bartered with the rebels for oil pending their victory in exchange for U.S. military support. The Obama administration did officially endorse the primary rebel group, the Transitional National Council, in July , and later pledged U.S. allegiance to the multinational coalition in aid of the uprising. “The rebels would have given us everything if we had some leader who knew how to negotiate,” Trump said in the video. “The rebels were being routed four months ago, absolutely routed by Gaddafi and his men. If four months ago we would have said, ‘We want 50 percent of the oil,’ they would have said, ‘Absolutely, we have a deal. Help us, help us. Please, you have a deal.’” That Trump takes issue with Obama is well documented. In the spring, he demanded that President Obama release his birth certificate . He’s also more recently criticized President for going too easy on the Occupy Wall Street protesters . But “the Donald” has his fair share of history with Gaddafi as well. As Mogulite points out, Trump once bragged to FOX News’ Fox and Friends that he “screwed” the Libyan dictator by renting him a plot of land at a hugely exorbitant rate. “Then I didn’t let him use the land,” Trump added. WATCH “From The Desk Of Donald Trump: Gadhafi”

Read the full article →

WATCH: Donald Trump On Gaddafi’s Death: ‘Big Deal’

October 20, 2011

Hearing the news of Muammar Gaddafi’s death on Thursday, many American leaders released statements on what the end of the Libyan dictator’s run meant for the world. “The dark shadow of tyranny has been lifted,” said President Barack Obama. “I think people across the world recognize that the world is a better place without Muammar Gaddafi,” said Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney. But businessman Donald Trump? He needed only two words: “Big deal.” After hearing of the death , Trump, the business magnate perhaps best known for his role on the NBC reality show The Apprentice , took to his webcam for an installment of “From The Desk Of Donald Trump” to discuss the political ramification ( h/t Mogulite ). Trump, who’s recently been labeled the “GOP kingmaker” by the Boston Globe , quickly launches into a criticism of the Obama administration’s decision-making during the Libyan uprising, specifically that the president should have bartered with the rebels for oil pending their victory in exchange for U.S. military support. The Obama administration did officially endorse the primary rebel group, the Transitional National Council, in July , and later pledged U.S. allegiance to the multinational coalition in aid of the uprising. “The rebels would have given us everything if we had some leader who knew how to negotiate,” Trump said in the video. “The rebels were being routed four months ago, absolutely routed by Gaddafi and his men. If four months ago we would have said, ‘We want 50 percent of the oil,’ they would have said, ‘Absolutely, we have a deal. Help us, help us. Please, you have a deal.’” That Trump takes issue with Obama is well documented. In the spring, he demanded that President Obama release his birth certificate . He’s also more recently criticized President for going too easy on the Occupy Wall Street protesters . But “the Donald” has his fair share of history with Gaddafi as well. As Mogulite points out, Trump once bragged to FOX News’ Fox and Friends that he “screwed” the Libyan dictator by renting him a plot of land at a hugely exorbitant rate. “Then I didn’t let him use the land,” Trump added. WATCH “From The Desk Of Donald Trump: Gadhafi”

Read the full article →

If EU Bans Ratings Agencies From Evaluating Bailout Countries, Who Will Investors Turn To For Terrible Advice?

October 20, 2011

The Wall Street Journal reports today that the EU is “leaning toward proposing a ban on the issuing of sovereign credit ratings for countries in bailout talks.” The EU’s internal market commissioner, Michel Barnier, says that he thinks “it’s legitimate to have a special treatment when a country is in negotiation or is covered by an international solidarity program with the IMF,” and, indeed, new IMF chief Christine Lagarde has signaled that she believes it’s appropriate for the EU to “prevent ratings for bailout countries.” As the EU has been “tightening rules on rating agencies progressively since the financial crisis,” according to the Journal , with a new set of proposals on the matter scheduled to be made in early November, odds are decent that this will emerge as the consensus view. However, there are dissenting opinions, and, as Reuters’ Ryan McCarthy points out, they are “hilarious” : “If ratings are banned, it will make it difficult for investors to assess the risk when a country returns to the bond market.” That’s from economist Marchel Alexandrovich, and if you want to know why he should consider taking that act on the road, let’s flash back to this piece from Shahien Nasiripour from September of 2009 — one year after the global financial crisis: Analysts at the three biggest credit rating agencies who gave positive, investment-grade ratings to AIG and Lehman Brothers up until their collapse have not been fired or disciplined, the heads of the agencies admitted at a Congressional hearing today. Moody’s, Standard & Poor’s, and Fitch Ratings all maintained at least A ratings on AIG and Lehman Brothers up until mid-September of last year . Lehman Brothers declared bankruptcy Sept. 15; the federal government provided AIG with its first of four multibillion-dollar bailouts the next day. At the hearing today, the exchange between [Representative Jackie] Speier and the agency chiefs was particularly contentious. “You had rated AIG and Lehman Brothers as AAA, AA minutes before they were collapsing. After they did fail, did you take any action against those analysts who had rated them?” Speier asked. “Did you fire them? Did you suspend them? Did you take any actions against those who had put that kind of a remarkable grade on products that were junk?” McDaniel answered first. “No, we did not fire any of the analysts involved in either AIG or Lehman,” he replied. “LOL,” is what I believe the Internet would tend to say to all of this. The Wall Street Journal reports, “There was no immediate comment from Fitch, S&P or Moody’s.” Yeah, I wouldn’t think so! [Would you like to follow me on Twitter ? Because why not? Also, please send tips to tv@huffingtonpost.com -- learn more about our media monitoring project here .]

Read the full article →

If EU Bans Ratings Agencies From Evaluating Bailout Countries, Who Will Investors Turn To For Terrible Advice?

October 20, 2011

The Wall Street Journal reports today that the EU is “leaning toward proposing a ban on the issuing of sovereign credit ratings for countries in bailout talks.” The EU’s internal market commissioner, Michel Barnier, says that he thinks “it’s legitimate to have a special treatment when a country is in negotiation or is covered by an international solidarity program with the IMF,” and, indeed, new IMF chief Christine Lagarde has signaled that she believes it’s appropriate for the EU to “prevent ratings for bailout countries.” As the EU has been “tightening rules on rating agencies progressively since the financial crisis,” according to the Journal , with a new set of proposals on the matter scheduled to be made in early November, odds are decent that this will emerge as the consensus view. However, there are dissenting opinions, and, as Reuters’ Ryan McCarthy points out, they are “hilarious” : “If ratings are banned, it will make it difficult for investors to assess the risk when a country returns to the bond market.” That’s from economist Marchel Alexandrovich, and if you want to know why he should consider taking that act on the road, let’s flash back to this piece from Shahien Nasiripour from September of 2009 — one year after the global financial crisis: Analysts at the three biggest credit rating agencies who gave positive, investment-grade ratings to AIG and Lehman Brothers up until their collapse have not been fired or disciplined, the heads of the agencies admitted at a Congressional hearing today. Moody’s, Standard & Poor’s, and Fitch Ratings all maintained at least A ratings on AIG and Lehman Brothers up until mid-September of last year . Lehman Brothers declared bankruptcy Sept. 15; the federal government provided AIG with its first of four multibillion-dollar bailouts the next day. At the hearing today, the exchange between [Representative Jackie] Speier and the agency chiefs was particularly contentious. “You had rated AIG and Lehman Brothers as AAA, AA minutes before they were collapsing. After they did fail, did you take any action against those analysts who had rated them?” Speier asked. “Did you fire them? Did you suspend them? Did you take any actions against those who had put that kind of a remarkable grade on products that were junk?” McDaniel answered first. “No, we did not fire any of the analysts involved in either AIG or Lehman,” he replied. “LOL,” is what I believe the Internet would tend to say to all of this. The Wall Street Journal reports, “There was no immediate comment from Fitch, S&P or Moody’s.” Yeah, I wouldn’t think so! [Would you like to follow me on Twitter ? Because why not? Also, please send tips to tv@huffingtonpost.com -- learn more about our media monitoring project here .]

Read the full article →

Microsoft, Not Apple, Beat Analysts’ Earnings Expectations

October 20, 2011

SAN FRANCISCO — Microsoft’s Windows franchise regained some of its vigor during the company’s latest quarter, but that might not be enough to overcome the perception that the world’s largest software maker is being outmaneuvered by nimble rivals whose fortunes aren’t tied to the personal computer. The results released Thursday were highlighted by a 7 percent increase in revenue that exceeded analyst estimates. The gains for the July-September period occurred throughout Microsoft’s product lineup, which includes the ubiquitous Windows operating system, widely used programs such as Office, the Xbox 360 video game console and the Bing search engine. The company’s earnings for the fiscal first quarter rose 6 percent from last year to match analyst projections. Investors weren’t impressed. Microsoft shares dipped 19 cents to $26.85 in Thursday’s extended trading. Microsoft’s stock price has been held back by worries that it isn’t adapting quickly enough as more people use smartphones and computer tablets such as Apple’s iPad instead of desktop and laptop computers that run on the Windows operating system. Three consecutive quarters in declining Windows revenue reinforced those concerns. That slump ended in the latest quarter as revenue in the Windows division crept up nearly 2 percent to $4.87 billion. The modest gain was slightly below the 3.2 percent to 3.6 percent rise in personal computer shipments during the quarter, based on estimates by Gartner Inc. and IDC. Meanwhile, Apple sold more than 11 million iPads during the same period, more than doubling the number from the same time last year. Most analysts believe sales of iPad and other computer tablets are going to keep accelerating at a rapid rate for the next several years. The trend is expected to decrease demand for PCs in households and businesses. In a Thursday conference call, Microsoft executives acknowledged the growing popularity of tablets will keep the pressure on the Windows division. Microsoft is tackling the problem with the most radical overhaul of Windows since the mid-1990s. The next version, called Windows 8, will run on touch-screen devices. The redesigned system generated a positive buzz when it was released to developers, but the software isn’t expected to hit the mass market until the middle of next year, at the earliest. Microsoft, which is based in Redmond, Wash., hasn’t specified a timetable. In the most recent quarter, Microsoft Corp. earned $5.7 billion, or 68 cents per share, for its fiscal first quarter. That compared with net income of $5.4 billion, or 62 cents per share, at the same time last year. The earnings matched the average estimate among analyst surveyed by FactSet. Revenue increased totaled $17.37 billion – about $130 million above analyst forecasts. At the same time last year, Microsoft’s revenue came in at $16.2 billion. By surpassing Wall Street’s revenue hurdle, Microsoft achieved something that eluded nemesis Apple Inc. during the same period. Although Apple’s revenue in the most recent quarter surged 39 percent from last year, the increase didn’t measure up to analyst expectations. The shortfall triggered a sharp drop in Apple’s stock price. Microsoft’s challenges extend beyond Windows. The company has been struggling for years to catch up to Google Inc. in the lucrative search advertising market. It’s been an exercise in frustration so far, saddling Microsoft’s online division with operating losses totaling $6.5 billion in the company’s last three fiscal years. The division’s sustained another loss of $494 million in the latest quarter, down from $558 million at the same time last year. Online revenue rose 19 percent to $625 million. Executives assured analysts in Thursday’s conference call that they’re determined to keep whittling the online division’s losses. To do that, Microsoft will likely have to fine tune its Internet search partnership with Yahoo Inc. Since Yahoo began relying on Microsoft’s technology for search results, the alliance has not been making as much money as the companies anticipated. The problems prompted Microsoft to extend a revenue guarantee through March 2013 – a year beyond the original deadline. Microsoft is also counting on its just-completed $8.5 billion acquisition of video chat service Skype to make its online services more compelling in social networking and digital video.

Read the full article →

Microsoft, Not Apple, Beat Analysts’ Earnings Expectations

October 20, 2011

SAN FRANCISCO — Microsoft’s Windows franchise regained some of its vigor during the company’s latest quarter, but that might not be enough to overcome the perception that the world’s largest software maker is being outmaneuvered by nimble rivals whose fortunes aren’t tied to the personal computer. The results released Thursday were highlighted by a 7 percent increase in revenue that exceeded analyst estimates. The gains for the July-September period occurred throughout Microsoft’s product lineup, which includes the ubiquitous Windows operating system, widely used programs such as Office, the Xbox 360 video game console and the Bing search engine. The company’s earnings for the fiscal first quarter rose 6 percent from last year to match analyst projections. Investors weren’t impressed. Microsoft shares dipped 19 cents to $26.85 in Thursday’s extended trading. Microsoft’s stock price has been held back by worries that it isn’t adapting quickly enough as more people use smartphones and computer tablets such as Apple’s iPad instead of desktop and laptop computers that run on the Windows operating system. Three consecutive quarters in declining Windows revenue reinforced those concerns. That slump ended in the latest quarter as revenue in the Windows division crept up nearly 2 percent to $4.87 billion. The modest gain was slightly below the 3.2 percent to 3.6 percent rise in personal computer shipments during the quarter, based on estimates by Gartner Inc. and IDC. Meanwhile, Apple sold more than 11 million iPads during the same period, more than doubling the number from the same time last year. Most analysts believe sales of iPad and other computer tablets are going to keep accelerating at a rapid rate for the next several years. The trend is expected to decrease demand for PCs in households and businesses. In a Thursday conference call, Microsoft executives acknowledged the growing popularity of tablets will keep the pressure on the Windows division. Microsoft is tackling the problem with the most radical overhaul of Windows since the mid-1990s. The next version, called Windows 8, will run on touch-screen devices. The redesigned system generated a positive buzz when it was released to developers, but the software isn’t expected to hit the mass market until the middle of next year, at the earliest. Microsoft, which is based in Redmond, Wash., hasn’t specified a timetable. In the most recent quarter, Microsoft Corp. earned $5.7 billion, or 68 cents per share, for its fiscal first quarter. That compared with net income of $5.4 billion, or 62 cents per share, at the same time last year. The earnings matched the average estimate among analyst surveyed by FactSet. Revenue increased totaled $17.37 billion – about $130 million above analyst forecasts. At the same time last year, Microsoft’s revenue came in at $16.2 billion. By surpassing Wall Street’s revenue hurdle, Microsoft achieved something that eluded nemesis Apple Inc. during the same period. Although Apple’s revenue in the most recent quarter surged 39 percent from last year, the increase didn’t measure up to analyst expectations. The shortfall triggered a sharp drop in Apple’s stock price. Microsoft’s challenges extend beyond Windows. The company has been struggling for years to catch up to Google Inc. in the lucrative search advertising market. It’s been an exercise in frustration so far, saddling Microsoft’s online division with operating losses totaling $6.5 billion in the company’s last three fiscal years. The division’s sustained another loss of $494 million in the latest quarter, down from $558 million at the same time last year. Online revenue rose 19 percent to $625 million. Executives assured analysts in Thursday’s conference call that they’re determined to keep whittling the online division’s losses. To do that, Microsoft will likely have to fine tune its Internet search partnership with Yahoo Inc. Since Yahoo began relying on Microsoft’s technology for search results, the alliance has not been making as much money as the companies anticipated. The problems prompted Microsoft to extend a revenue guarantee through March 2013 – a year beyond the original deadline. Microsoft is also counting on its just-completed $8.5 billion acquisition of video chat service Skype to make its online services more compelling in social networking and digital video.

Read the full article →

Richard Barrington: Were the Good Old Days Really That Good?

October 20, 2011

Ronald Reagan is something of an icon to economic conservatives, and you don’t have to lean that far to the right to get a little nostalgic about the “Morning in America” days of the early 1980s. After all, in today’s era of high unemployment, mounting government debt, and rising insecurity about American competitiveness, it’s natural to think back to the good old days of 30 years ago. But were the good old days really that good? A comparison of economic conditions between the early 1980s and now reveals some remarkable similarities. This suggests that the good old days really weren’t all that good — or perhaps that things now aren’t as bad as they seem. Here are seven factors that link today with the early 1980s: High unemployment. Troubled by today’s 9.1 percent inflation rate? In 1982, the U.S. unemployment rate peaked at 10.8 percent, and between 1982 and 1983 it topped 10 percent for 10 consecutive months. As bad as the recent job market has been, unemployment peaked at 10.1 percent, and only stayed above 10 percent for one month. Double-dip recession. People today are concerned about the possibility of a double-dip recession, but in the early 1980s the U.S. actually experienced one. A recession ended in July of 1980, only to be followed by a much longer one beginning a year later. As a result, the U.S. economy spent 22 of the first 35 months of the 1980s in recession. Troublesome interest rates. Here is a clear contrast: interest rates in the early 1980s were sky high, whereas now they are rock bottom. Six-month CD rates hit their all-time high of 17.98 percent in August of 1981; they bottomed out at 0.29 percent in January of 2010, and have now spent more than two years under 1 percent. Double-digit interest rates may sound good to people with CDs, savings, and money market accounts , but the flip side of those high bank rates is that it made mortgages much more expensive. Mortgage rates peaked at 18.45 percent in October of 1981; now, they’ve spent more than a year under 5 percent. High inflation. Inflation has been on the rise in 2011, but it is a minor problem compared to the early 1980s. Inflation spent all of 1980 and most of 1981 above 10 percent, peaking at a year-over-year rate of 14.6 percent in early 1980. Weak consumer sentiment. One of the things plaguing the current economy is weak consumer demand. Battered by high unemployment and falling real estate values, and already weighed down by high debt levels, consumers today just don’t have the confidence to spend much money. The Thomson Reuters/University of Michigan index of consumer expectations about the economy fell to 47.0 in early September. The last time this index was that low? You guessed it — the early 1980s. A growing budget deficit. One of the most serious problems faced by the U.S. economy is the growing budget deficit, but while that deficit has reached record levels in recent years, it is hardly a new problem. The U.S. budget deficit increased five-fold in the first four years of the 1980s, setting a new record every time. Deficit spending, unfortunately, has become something of a bi-partisan tradition. Six of the last seven presidents have pushed the deficit to new all-time highs, with Bill Clinton being the only exception. Competition from Asia. A recent trade bill that targeted Chinese imports underscores how great an economic concern that country has become. This is because, among other things, the U.S. owes China a tremendous amount of money. Back in the 1980s, though, it was Japan that was expected to supplant the U.S. as the world’s economic leader. But Japan faded, leaving the U.S. to take on the next contender. At a time when the U.S. is facing considerable problems, it should be reassuring to know the country has faced similar challenges before, yet still found a way forward. The original article can be found at Money-Rates.com : ” Were the good old days really that good? ”

Read the full article →

As Budget Cuts Loom, Federal Layoffs Seem Increasingly Likely

October 20, 2011

Even as the nation’s economy has limped along these past few years — with millions of Americans unable to find jobs — the federal government has kept hiring. But now even that sector looks like it could be cutting back, adding further troubles to an economy struggling to find buoyancy. Budget cuts threaten the workforce of every federal agency, according to a recent bulletin from outplacement company Challenger, Gray & Christmas, which noted that various offices of the federal government have already announced a combined 81,000 payroll cuts in 2011. The imperative to rein in government spending — typified by the 12-member super committee currently trying to find between $1.2 and $1.5 trillion in deficit savings — has meant nearly every office in Washington, including the military and intelligence agencies, faces the possibility of having to downsize in the near future. “The federal government really has yet to feel the heat, but it’s coming,” John Challenger, CEO of Challenger, Gray & Christmas, told The Huffington Post. “All of these situations that are now surfacing suggest that the federal government is going to see much heavier layoffs in the upcoming months.” Those situations include major proposed cuts to the intelligence budget — recently described by James Clapper, the director of national intelligence, as being in the “double-digit” percentage range — and to the Internal Revenue Service, which faces the possibility of losing $600 million in next year’s federal budget . The U.S. Postal Service, which operates largely on the revenue it brings in from mail services, has suggested a plan to trim expenses by $20 billion, in part by eliminating some 220,000 jobs . And looming over all these potential cuts is the possibility that the super committee will fail to reach an agreement by its November 23 deadline — in which case $1.2 trillion in so-called trigger cuts would automatically kick in, affecting military and domestic programs in equal proportion. While the final outcome of these various negotiations remains unclear, it’s unlikely government payrolls will stay as big as they currently are. Job insecurity is coming relatively late to federal employees, who have by and large escaped the worst of the cost-cutting measures that translated into lost jobs for many state, county and local government workers in the past three years. Federal positions have traditionally been regarded as among the most stable in the public sector, with one recent analysis even showing that employees in certain agencies — such as the Environmental Protection Agency and the Department of Housing and Urban Development — are statistically more likely to die than to get laid off or fired. But in the scramble to cut the federal deficit, a process set in motion over the summer, when President Obama reached an agreement with Congress to trim the government budget by year’s end if an extension to the country’s borrowing authority could be made, what once looked safe now seems uncertain. To make matters worse, government layoffs are expected to reverberate into the private sector. Reduced federal payrolls would mean less business for industries that deal with the government — from the defense and aerospace industry to the technology, agriculture and health-care sectors. And federal downsizing is expected to offset the modest gains in job growth being made elsewhere in the economy. “Each month, when the private sector does create jobs, the impact on the economy is diminished by what’s happening in government,” Challenger told HuffPost. “It’s a stiff headwind that prevents the labor markets from improving.”

Read the full article →

Jim Wallis: The "Un-Economy"

October 20, 2011

In an international meeting last week with economists, business executives, non-profit organizational leaders, and theologians, my colleague Stewart Wallis of the New Economics Institute succinctly summed up the problems of the current global economy: it’s unfair , unsustainable , unstable , and is making many people unhappy . These issues of the “un-economy” were at the heart of our discussions at the World Economic Forum, and the Occupy Wall Street encampment I just visited in New York City. Unfair. Since the Occupy Wall Street movement began, the talk about inequality has been greater than I can remember it being for a very long time. This has been the elephant in the room in our discussions about the economy that nobody wanted to say out loud. In the last hundred years, there have been two peak periods of great inequality in American society–just before the Great Depression, and in 2008, right before our current Great Recession. And in the mysterious and secret global transactions between investment bankers and hedge fund traders, the profits continue to grow. From 1973 to 1985, the financial sector peaked at 16 percent of domestic corporate profits. In the 1990s it reached postwar period highs by going between 21 and 30 percent. But this decade it hit 41 percent. These profits weren’t from products, and weren’t always from finding the best use for capital, but from money making more money for a new class of super rich financial traders. And now, when their risk taking, greed, and selfishness created a mess for so many others, we bailed them out and left everyone else to suffer in the economic wilderness of unemployment, home foreclosures, pension losses, deep middle class insecurity, and shamefully, rising poverty rates. Opportunity is a lost hope for many, as social mobility in America is now less than in Western Europe. And if you search the scriptures, you’ll find that God not only cares about poverty, but especially, unfairness and inequality. That’s what the young people at Wall Street are angry about. Unsustainable. If everybody had a Ferrari, the planet could not survive. And the earth groans as the ethics, or non-ethics, of endless growth are measured only by corporate shareholders in quarterly profit and loss statements. “Short-termism” was a term I heard over and over in the broad conversations about values at the World Economic Forum. A global economy based on dirty energy and creating unjust regimes, angry populations, endless terrorism and war, and dangerously warming the planet (apologies to those presidential candidates who have disavowed science) is clearly unsustainable. Add to that an advertising industry that systematically, psychologically, and even spiritually turns “wants” into “needs,” is a formula for human and ecological disaster. It’s time to move from a narrowly defined shareholder economy to a stakeholder economy that includes workers, consumers, the environment , and future generations  – all in our economic calculations and decision-making. Unstable. Another conversation that is taking place alongside the values discussion, both at the World Economic Forum and at Occupy Wall Street, is about the dangerous and growing conflicts over the resources of food, water, land, and energy. Conflicts, both present and future, will not be over ideology alone, but over survival in the face of resource scarcity or resource mal-distribution. Contrast that to the two principles of God’s economy: There is enough, if we share it. Much of the most hopeful talk at the Occupy movement sites is about new economic approaches based on local, cooperative, and sustainable models of market activity. My god-daughter, Korla Masters, is engaged in the mushrooming urban gardening movement in my home town of Detroit, and she tells me that if only half the vacant land in the city were cultivated, it could provide up to three quarters of the need for vegetables and fruits in the Motor City–imagine non-petroleum based food economies with little transport involved. Unhappy. Being rich doesn’t make you happy. Of course, happiness and well-being are connected to a modicum of economic security that we all need. But “enough is enough” is proven to be a better guide to a happy life than the maxim “greed is good.” The logic and metrics on a manic consumer economy is that you are never supposed to be satisfied with what you have, but that you always demand more .  That endless striving and never ending desire is not making people happy, but rather is highly pressured into a lifestyle of constant stress. In Detroit, we are seeing the burgeoning urban gardens producing several things: jobs, good and clean food, and a sense of community–all of which are ingredients for a happy life. So here’s our mission . 1. Don’t expect the Occupy Wall Street movement and sites across the nation and world to produce a set of demands. They are instead raising some fundamental questions about the un-economy, and creating the space for a new cultural and political conversation about it. It’s our job now to push that conversation forward — an especially good role for the faith community as our biblical values and theological assertions are integrally involved in these matters. It’s time to put our faith values forward in the midst of what could become a new global conversation about what a fair, sustainable, stable, and happy economy might look like. 2. Don’t worry about endorsing the Occupy Wall Street movement (all the diverse elements involved wouldn’t even endorse each other!), but rather engage it. I asked a young African American man I met at Occupy Wall Street what churches could do to help. He suggested three things: inspiration, consultation, and presence. I think that’s a very good guide. Worship services are already being held at many of the sites led by local clergy of many faiths. Take a potluck meal down to the site as a chance to sit, eat, and talk with the people there. Take your youth group, or members of your congregation down there after church just to see, meet, and listen. Offer the occupiers support–material and spiritual–along with prayer and love. Jim Wallis is the author of Rediscovering Values: On Wall Street, Main Street, and Your Street — A Moral Compass for the New Economy , and CEO of Sojourners . He blogs at www.godspolitics.com . Follow Jim on Twitter @JimWallis .

Read the full article →

Kay Koplovitz: JOBS, JOBS, JOBS: Everyone Is Talking About Them but Who Is Doing Something to Create Them?

October 20, 2011

Howard Schultz for one. Yes, the founder and CEO of Starbucks Howard Schultz has taken this challenge up himself with an idea incubated at Starbucks to provide loans to small businesses using Starbucks stores as the store front for micro-lending to small business. Oh, no. Starbucks would not become a bank. No, they are in the business of selling coffee . But they do have 7,000 locations throughout the US and tens of millions of customers who just might be up to the task of donating to the effort to free up capital for small business. If our banks won’t do it, maybe the people will. It’s a form of crowdfunding if you will. The idea is that Starbucks would collect donations from customers. Those who would give $5.00 or more, would get a red, white and blue wristband. It would be a symbol of Americans helping Americans. Of course, Starbucks needed to find a partner who could administer the micro-lending program. The resourceful team at Starbucks came up with the ideal match, the Community Development Finance Institutions , or CDFI’s. These non-profit organizations specialize in lending the underserved communities, where the lenders know the borrowers quite well and the default rates are extremely low. New York Times op ed writer Joe Nocera gave a shout out to the Starbucks initiative in his column on October 18th. This initiative is to be called Create Jobs for USA , and the marketing of it will be paid for by the Starbucks Foundation. What I really like about this initiative is that people can participate for a very small donation. I hope Create Jobs for USA will be opened up to other retailers where people can donate. And let’s not stop there. The text messaging contributions to the Red Cross and other organizations during the Haiti disaster was a fast and easy way for people to donate $10. I say, let’s get the capital back in the hands of the people running small businesses again and get this economy growing. It’s the most practical way to create new jobs. Importantly, the donated funds can be leveraged up to 7 times according to Mark Pinsky, who heads Opportunity Finance Network , one of the larger CDFI funds. This means that $20 million donated can raise $140 million in funding. Now this is really a solid beginning. We are so lucky to have entrepreneurs like Howard Schultz who can energize a marketplace with out of the park ideas. I hope this one takes off. It’s scheduled to be launched in November. Save up your spare change, folks, and go down to the nearest Starbucks store. We’re about to engage in crowdfunding to get America moving again.

Read the full article →

Don Tapscott: Three Principles for a New Wall Street

October 20, 2011

Protesters set up the “Occupy Wall Street” base camp in New York a month ago because the location epitomizes the economic forces that control the U.S. and global economies. As one sign read: “This is not a recession. It’s a robbery.” To many it feels like just that. The financial services industry is in desperate need of reform. Many bankers have behaved as secretive corporate titans serving only their own interests, and insist the devastating consequences are not their fault. They are failing to fulfill their obligations to society — in some cases, even to shareholders — and a growing number of critics view the day-to-day behavior of the financial services industry as unacceptable. If the industry doesn’t initiate reform from within then it will eventually have more extreme reform imposed from outside. In 2008, the routine gambles of Wall Street almost brought down global capitalism and yet, so far, nothing fundamentally has changed. Restoring long-term confidence in the financial services industry requires more than individual banks changing their behavior or even governments intervening with new rules. The industry needs a new modus operandi, where all of the key players (banks, insurers, investment brokers, rating agencies and regulators) adopt the three facets of collaboration: integrity, transparency, and embracing the commons. Integrity. Trust is the expectation that the other party will act with integrity — be honest, considerate, and abide by its commitments. To re-establish trust, the financial services industry needs to have integrity as part of its DNA. But the cavalier manner in which many banking executives violated integrity was stunning. For example they sold sub-prime mortgages to people who could never make the payments; bundled them into securities and convinced rating agencies to classify them as AAA, and insurance companies to insure them. They then sold these to unsuspecting investors. They violated all the values of Integrity. Everyone in the process suffered and the global economy was sent into a tailspin. The 2008 meltdown and the Euro crises we face today illustrate how interconnected our world has become. Organizations must be much more aware of what is going on around them. It’s important to know the behavior of others and the potential impacts of the actions of distant third parties. If there is anything Wall Street should have learned from the mess they created it was that business cannot succeed in a world that is failing. In everything from motivating employees, negotiating with partners, disclosing financial information, or explaining the environmental impacts of a new factory, companies and other organizations must tell the truth, be considerate of the interests of others, and be willing to be held accountable for delivering against their commitments. Companies need to act with integrity — not just to secure a healthy business environment, but for their own sustainability and competitive advantage. Increasingly, firms that exhibit ethical values and candor have discovered that they can build trust with customers, employees, shareholders and business partners. This makes them more competitive and profitable. Transparency. One of the reasons companies have to have integrity is that they operate in an unprecedented, hyper-transparent world. Customers use the Internet to help evaluate the true worth of products. Employees share formerly secret information about corporate strategy, management and challenges. To collaborate effectively, companies share intimate knowledge with one another. And in a world of instant communications, whistleblowers, inquisitive media, and Google, citizens and communities routinely put firms under the microscope. So if corporations are going to be naked — and they really have no choice in the matter — they had better be buff. But the financial services industry has a history of being opaque and secretive. One Goldman Sachs executive told me off the record: “We’re a very private company. The less people know about us and pay attention to us, the better.” In commenting on the U.S. government fraud charges against Goldman, Roger Martin, dean of the Rotman School of Management at the University of Toronto said, “Sadly for Goldman, transparency is not an attractive option. The better Goldman does in explaining exactly what its business is, the more outraged regulators and the public will be.” If Wall Street had been fully transparent during the past decade, the sub-prime debacle would not have occurred. In the future, investors, rating agencies and insurance companies should be able to ‘fly over’ and ‘drill down’ into securities such as Collateralized Debt Obligations and analyse the underlying assets. With full data, they could readily assess the payment history, and correlate information such as employment histories, property values, location, neighborhood pricings, delinquency patterns, and so on. Potential investors will quickly realize the CDOs’ junk status and refuse to buy. Since banks wouldn’t be able to offload sub-prime mortgages, they wouldn’t create them in the first place. The industry needs to resolve, immediately, that it understands that sunlight is the best disinfectant. Embracing the Commons. Wall Street reform requires restructuring of the industry. Wall Street companies need to overcome their obsession with proprietary ownership of their intellectual property and learn to share certain information. For example, the banks currently have upwards of a trillion dollars of “toxic assets” on their balance sheets. Since no one knows the true value, the assets have created so-called “zombie banks” that won’t lend money to entrepreneurs. Because 80 percent of new jobs come from companies 5-years-old or less, the inability of startups to borrow money is a huge impediment to job creation. How can the banks value these assets, dispose of them and get back to normal? They should be sharing the information — essentially placing risk management in a commons. Think risk management Linux style, which is completely feasible and affordable in a digitized world. For instance, the Open Models Valuation Company is using the web to create a global community of experts dedicated to establishing credible valuation and risk assessments for credit securities and contracts such as CDOs and other derivatives. Craig Heimark, an industry veteran and one of the founders of Open Models, likens it to the scientific peer-review process: “In the scientific world when people publish something, they don’t just publish their results, but also the steps in the process, their methods and assumptions so that they can be vetted by others.” Exposing complex financial instruments to the vetting of thousands of experts could help restore trust in banks, kick-start venture capital, unfreeze the paralysis of lending markets and lay the foundation for a new and stronger financial service industry. The paramount role of banks is not to create shareholder value and enrich their executives. They exist to provide a safe place for people and organizations to store their money and get credit. They exist to execute myriad transactions, make capital markets and are central to our economy. We charter them with a license to operate so that they can perform these functions, but the recent repeated crises show they have violated their pact with society. One of the most popular signs in the Occupy movement is “Nationalize the Banks.” If Wall Street does not adopt these three principles and change its core modus operandi, it risks having its license revoked. Reposted from Reuters.com

Read the full article →

Jason Alderman: Medicare Open Enrollment Comes Early

October 20, 2011

If you’re enrolled in Medicare, mark these dates on your calendar: October 15-December 7, 2011. That’s Medicare’s 2012 Open Enrollment period — and you should note that it occurs a month earlier this year than in the past. Aside from exceptions made for a few special circumstances, such as moving outside a plan’s service area, this is the only period when current enrollees can make coverage changes for the coming calendar year. Here’s a quick primer on how Medicare works: Eligibility . Medicare provides health care benefits to people age 65 and older and those under 65 with certain disabilities or end-stage renal disease. For most people, the initial enrollment period is the seven-month period that begins three months before the month they turn 65. If you miss that window, you may enroll for the first time between January 1 and March 31 each year, although your coverage won’t begin until July 1. Medicare Options . Medicare offers several plans and coverage options, including: Medicare Part A , which covers in-patient hospital, skilled nursing facility and hospice services, as well as home health care. People are usually enrolled automatically upon turning 65 or after having received Social Security disability benefits for 24 months. There’s usually no monthly premium. Medicare Part B, which covers doctor’s services, outpatient care and some preventive services. It’s optional and has a monthly premium. Most people are automatically enrolled at the same time they begin Part A coverage, but you can opt out by following instructions accompanying your Medicare card (mailed about three months before your 65th birthday). Medicare Part C (Medicare Advantage) plans, which are privately run alternatives to traditional Parts A and B. Structured like HMO or PPO plans, they often include additional benefits such as prescription drugs, dental, vision and wellness programs. Monthly premiums may be higher than regular Part B, but they usually have lower deductibles and copayments; also, they require that you use the plan’s provider network. Medicare Part D, which covers prescription drugs. It’s optional and carries a monthly premium. These privately run plans vary widely in terms of cost, copayments and deductibles and medications covered. Medigap. Many people purchase additional Medigap (or Medicare Supplemental) insurance offered by private insurers. It follows strict government coverage guidelines and helps pay for many items not covered by Medicare, including deductibles, copayments and coinsurance. A few additional considerations: With Medicare Parts B and D, you’ll often face sizable penalty fees if you don’t enroll when first becoming eligible; however, if you’re currently covered by an employer’s plan you can later enroll without penalty. Also, if your Medicare Advantage plan includes drug coverage, you don’t need Part D. Terms of Medicare Advantage and Part D Prescription Drug plans such as premiums, copayments and which drugs are covered can change from year to year, so carefully review enrollment materials from your current plans to make sure they still match your needs. If you have a Medigap policy and later join a Medicare Advantage plan, consider dropping Medigap, since it can’t be used to pay for Advantage copayments, deductibles and premiums. Medicare Open Enrollment. During Open Enrollment you can: Switch from original Medicare Parts A, B and D to a Medicare Advantage plan, or vice versa. Switch from one Advantage plan to another. Switch from an Advantage plan that offers prescription coverage to one that doesn’t, and vice versa. Join a Part D plan. Switch from one Part D plan to another. Drop Part D coverage altogether. People currently enrolled in a Medicare Advantage plan have another opportunity to make changes during a second period called Medicare Advantage Disenrollment. Between January 1, 2012, and February 14, 2012, you can switch back to original Medicare Parts A and B coverage, with the option to join Part D as well. However, during this period you cannot: Switch from original Medicare to Medicare Advantage. Switch from one Medicare Advantage plan to another. Switch from one Part D plan to another. Understanding and choosing the right Medicare options can be complicated and time-consuming. For assistance, call 1-800-633-4227 or visit Medicare’s website , where you’ll find: Helpful publications, including Medicare & You 2011 , a highly detailed guide that explains Medicare in easy-to-understand language. Tools to compare prescription drug plans, hospitals, nursing homes, home health agencies and Medigap plans in your area. A resource to find local doctors and other health practitioners who participate in Medicare. Services covered by various Medicare plans. Enrollment instructions. In addition to the Medicare website, AARP provides a very thorough Guide to Medicare . Also, your doctor or pharmacist may be able to help you choose the most cost-effective prescription drug plan for your situation. This article is intended to provide general information and should not be considered legal, tax or financial advice. It’s always a good idea to consult a legal, tax or financial advisor for specific information on how certain laws apply to you and about your individual financial situation.

Read the full article →

Median Income Falls To 10-Year Low As Number Of Millionaires Grows

October 20, 2011

Americans’ incomes are falling, perhaps a reason why pessimism about their personal finances is now the lowest it’s been in a decade. The median income fell in 2010 for the second year in a row to $26,364 , a 1.2 percent drop from 2009, and the lowest level since 1999, according to David Cay Johnston at Reuters. Meanwhile, U.S. households are growing increasingly concerned about their finances with more than 20 percent of adult Americans rating their financial situation as “poor,” a Gallup poll finds. That’s a larger share than the 16 to 19 percent of Americans who viewed their finances as poor during and after the recession. It’s also the highest percentage since 2001, the first year of the survey, according to Gallup. In some ways, the financial crisis has taken more of a toll on the employed during the recovery. Indeed, Americans’ incomes have fallen more during the recovery than they did during the recession. Incomes dropped 6.7 percent during the recovery between June 2009 and June 2011, compared to a 3.2 percent drop during the recession from December 2007 to June 2009, a study from former Census Bureau officials found. And it will take some time to get incomes back to where they were before the recession. The U.S. median income has declined 7 percent in the last 10 years and while economists expect incomes to rise over the next decade, it likely won’t be enough to return to pre-recession income levels, the Wall Street Journal reports. Not everyone is suffering, however. The number of workers making $1 million or more actually rose to nearly 94,000 last year from 78,000 in 2009, according to Reuters. Still, most employed workers don’t expect much in the near future. Nine out of 10 American workers say they don’t expect to get a salary increase in the next year that will be enough to compensate for rising food and fuel prices, a June American Pulse survey found. Meanwhile, Gallup’s Basic Necessities Index — a measure of Americans’ access to food, shelter and health care — fell earlier this month to lows on par with recession levels. Corporations may finally be feeling the pain of a sluggish recovery too, MSNBC reports. As CEOs continue to report their company earnings for the last quarter, their outlooks for the future will likely include belt-tightening measures , according to MSNBC.

Read the full article →

Herman, Keefe, Summers Elected to Online News Association Board

October 20, 2011

WASHINGTON, DC–(Marketwire – Oct 20, 2011) – Members of the Online News Association (ONA), the world’s largest membership organization of digital journalists, elected three new members to its Board of Directors and reelected three incumbents to two-year terms.

Read the full article →

Magnetic Names James Green as New Chief Executive Officer

October 20, 2011

Former Executive From 24/7 Real Media, Disney & Sabela Media to Take Search Retargeting Leader to Its Next Stage

Read the full article →

The Los Angeles Junior Chamber of Commerce Names Helen Han as New Chief Executive Officer

October 20, 2011

Helen Han Takes Reign of an 87-Year-Old Membership Organization That Has Shaped the Lives of Thousands of Young Professionals Through Leadership Development, Community Service and Professional Enrichment

Read the full article →

Stevia Corp. Names Expert Agronomist as Chief Scientist for Stevia R&D in Vietnam

October 20, 2011

INDIANAPOLIS, IN–(Marketwire – Oct 20, 2011) – Stevia Corp. ( OTCBB : STEV ) (“Stevia Corp.” or the “Company”), a farm management company focused on the economic development of Stevia, the fastest growing product in the alternative sweetener sector, is pleased to welcome Dr. Young Cheol Cho to the position of Chief Scientist.

Read the full article →

US Cheesecake Factory’s Q3 profit down 6.3% to USD20.6m

October 20, 2011

US Cheesecake Factory’s Q3 profit down 6.3% to USD20.6m

Read the full article →

Internet Giant "Yahoo" Reports Declines in Revenue and Profit

October 20, 2011

Internet Giant “Yahoo” Reports Declines in Revenue and Profit

Read the full article →

T-System Welcomes Robert J. Bunker to Board of Directors

October 20, 2011

Established Executive and Former Military Officer Brings Extensive Healthcare Government and Business Knowledge to Company’s Group of Advisers

Read the full article →

UK freezes assets of 5 Iranians over Saudi plot

October 20, 2011

UK freezes assets of 5 Iranians over Saudi plot

Read the full article →

Nestle’s Jan-Sep sales down 13%

October 20, 2011

Nestle’s Jan-Sep sales down 13%

Read the full article →

Brazil’s Jan-Oct exports USD202.7b

October 20, 2011

Brazil’s Jan-Oct exports USD202.7b

Read the full article →

China’s Jan-Sep tax revenue surges 27.4%

October 20, 2011

China’s Jan-Sep tax revenue surges 27.4%

Read the full article →

UK to boost wave, tidal generated power

October 20, 2011

UK to boost wave, tidal generated power

Read the full article →

Nestle sees higher sales than expected in 2011

October 20, 2011

Nestle sees higher sales than expected in 2011

Read the full article →

Ericsson’s quarterly profits rise to USD573m

October 20, 2011

Ericsson’s quarterly profits rise to USD573m

Read the full article →

Kenya: Somali militant attacks hurting economy

October 20, 2011

Kenya: Somali militant attacks hurting economy

Read the full article →

LIVE UPDATES: Latest Developments From The Global Occupy Movement

October 20, 2011

Occupy Wall Street, a movement that began as a small band of protesters in Zuccotti Park, soon gained endorsements from major unions and progressive leaders as well as prominent politicians. Within a few short weeks, it began to resemble a movement with more than 900 meetups in 900 cities across the country. On Oct. 15, the cause spread across the globe with Occupy rallies in Australia, London, Madrid and other cities saddled with long unemployment lines, gross income disparities and hapless politicians. Organizers have erected tent cities in town squares and held rallies in front of city halls. Major marches have been held in Las Vegas and Portland, and there have been strong showings in Chicago and Austin as well as a stubborn encampment in Atlanta. (CLICK HERE OR SCROLL DOWN FOR LATEST UPDATES ) It’s unclear just where all these general assembly meetings, Twitter updates and teach-ins are heading. Democratic leaders, including Vice President Joe Biden and House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi , expressed support for the protesters this week and officials such as U.S. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner and Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke have said they sympathize with the protestors’ feelings of anger towards big banks’ role in the financial crisis. Naomi Klein, Michael Moore, Tahrir Square veterans and notable environmentalists have all made cameo appearances. Authors have stepped up and added their names. Organized labor has also backed the protests. This support has not helped relations with the police. The activists have endured pepper spray, a baton-wielding white-shirt and the mass arrest of more than 700 demonstrators on the Brooklyn Bridge. That incident is now the subject of a class-action lawsuit filed in federal court. These incidents will either come to define the movement or simply be blips onto something more substantial and lasting. The protesters’ list of grievances is long, with issues ranging from the foreclosure crisis and work-place discrimination to student loan debt. The protests in New York and other cities focus on income inequality, a theme common in the group’s internet presence, including on a Tumblr that showcases Americans dealing with joblessness and other issues. Even if the protesters were able to narrow their concerns to one easily defined goal, some organizers say that would miss the point. So what comes next? If you’ve been to an Occupy Wall Street event anywhere in the country, we’d like to hear from you. Send OfftheBus your photos, links to videos or first-hand accounts of what you’ve seen for possible inclusion in The Huffington Posts’s coverage at offthebus@huffingtonpost.com . If you would like to sign up to be a citizen journalist through OfftheBus, sign up at offthebus.org .

Read the full article →

Brazil CB to cut annual basic interest rate

October 20, 2011

Brazil CB to cut annual basic interest rate

Read the full article →

London Olympics 2012 to create many job opportunities

October 20, 2011

London Olympics 2012 to create many job opportunities

Read the full article →