america

Americans Favor Protesters Over Wall Street, Washington

November 7, 2011

LOWELL, Mass. — A new national poll released Sunday shows neither Wall Street nor Occupy Wall Street conjuring up strong favorable impressions among the American public. But protesters fared better than their wealthy corporate targets in the poll conducted for the University of Massachusetts at Lowell and the Boston Herald. Among 1,005 adults surveyed, 35 percent had a favorable impression of the protest movement that began in New York City and gained support worldwide. Only 16 percent could say the same for Wall Street and large corporations. Twenty-nine percent had a favorable impression of the tea party movement and 21 percent of government in Washington. Knowledge Networks conducted the survey, asking participants their impressions of the four groups. Wall Street and large corporations tied with Washington government in unpopularity, with 71 percent of those polled saying they had an unfavorable impression of big business and Washington. The tea party got a 50 percent unfavorable response and Occupy Wall Street 40 percent. The group surveyed was selected randomly and the poll conducted online from Oct. 28 through Nov. 1. It had a margin of error of 3.8 percentage points, meaning the results could go up or down by that amount. Last month, an Associated Press-GfK poll showed some 37 percent supported the Wall Street protesters. Fifty-eight percent said they were furious about America’s politics, up from 49 percent in January.

Read the full article →

Multibillion Dollar BP Deal Collapses

November 6, 2011

HONG KONG/LONDON Nov 6 (Reuters) – BP’s plan to sell a stake in its South American unit for $7 billion (4 billion pounds) has collapsed, potentially trimming the oil major’s cash flow and making it harder to raise its payout to shareholders. China’s biggest offshore oil producer CNOOC Ltd said on Sunday its 50 percent-owned unit Bridas Energy Holdings has terminated a deal to buy BP’s stake in Argentina-based oil and gas group Pan American Energy LLC (PAE). BP hinted at its third-quarter results last month that it would announce an increase in its dividend in early 2012. However, the failure of the sale of its 60 percent interest in PAE could mean cashflow is lower than might have been expected, making it harder to raise the dividend. At the results, BP said the deal, initially signed last November, was not as important to the firm’s cashflow today as it was a year ago. “We reached that agreement last year at a time when oil prices were lower. It was a time when we actually needed to make some divestments of properties. We’re past that point. We don’t actually need to make that divestment….if it doesn’t happen, it’s absolutely fine,” Chief Executive Bob Dudley told analysts at the time. BP said in a statement on Sunday it will repay a deposit of $3.5 billion received for the PAE stake at the end of 2010, which would not impact its level of gearing. BP’s planned sale of the stake was intended to help raise funds to pay for the cleanup of its Gulf of Mexico oil spill in 2010. BP had been waiting on regulatory approval for the deal to proceed. “The transaction was subject to conditions precedent – namely, Argentine anti-trust and Chinese governmental approvals,” said a spokesman at BP. “Securing these approvals was the sole responsibility of Bridas. Bridas had not yet been able to satisfy these conditions precedent but the approval processes were ongoing and, for reasons known only to them, Bridas has now chosen to terminate the transaction,” he added. BP previously said delays in regulatory approval were understandable given the ongoing election campaign in Argentina. In a filing with the Hong Kong stock exchange, CNOOC said Bridas Energy sent BP a letter on Nov. 5 to terminate the deal. It gave no further details. Late last month, CNOOC said Bridas Corp had not obtained the necessary regulatory approvals to complete the $7 billion bid. It had said Nov 1. was the deadline after which either party would have the right to terminate the agreement. Bridas already owns a 40 percent stake in the group, which BP has described as Argentina’s second-largest producer of oil and gas. CNOOC may have developed cold feet over the agreement because of the arbitrary and heavy handed nature of Argentina’s government that has seen Western oil and gas companies exit the country, according to a report from Jefferies Group at the end of October. BP said it will now consider all its strategic options regarding PAE. Copyright 2011 Thomson Reuters. Click for Restrictions .

Read the full article →

Occupy Atlanta Protesters To Risk Arrest In Park, Spokeswoman Says

November 6, 2011

ATLANTA — Dozens of people affiliated with Occupy Atlanta have been gathering in a downtown park and a spokeswoman says they plan to spend the night there, risking arrest. La’Die (lay-dee) Mansfield said Saturday the group will stay overnight after rallying in Woodruff Park, which closes at 11 p.m. The mayor’s office and police have said anyone who stays in the park past closing time will be arrested. The Atlanta-Journal Constitution ( ) reports that the Rev. Jesse Jackson arrived at the park Saturday night to show his support for protesters. He told them that the movement was an extension of Martin Luther King Jr.’s Poor People’s Campaign. http://bit.ly/rUAOTN Police on Oct. 26 arrested more than 50 people they say were violating a city ordinance by staying in the park after the closing time.

Read the full article →

Eric Yaverbaum: Watch Your Step: How Foursquare Can Get Customers in the door

November 4, 2011

Working in the field of public relations for nearly 30 years, I have found that although I am open to trying new things, social media is an interesting phenomenon that’s both scary and intriguing at the same time. It can be a publicist’s greatest asset — or worst nightmare. Years ago, the best publicity was in the form of word-of-mouth, traditional print, and broadcast television. Fast forward to the present, publicity campaigns are integrated and sometimes even built around online strategies, leveraging ad buys in magazines to get editorial coverage (oh wait, did I just reveal a PR secret?), and oh yes… social media campaigns. Who would have thought that the brand of a company could exist on the Internet? Where you can’t really feel it (remember getting ink on your fingers when you thumbed through the morning paper?). Big businesses can afford to invest in these types of campaigns; After all, they have marketing and advertising budgets that to a small business can be rather intimidating (think a Chihuahua standing next to a Great Dane). So, what is a small business to do in this world of playing catch up? Social media certainly makes it easier to reach people, many don’t consider the fact that one person on Facebook has access to the SAME 500 million users that a multi-billion dollar company does. That certainly changes the perspective a little bit, huh? So, what is a small business to do? How can social media get customers in the door but play the game smarter? Carmine Gallo, communications coach and author of The Power of Foursquare: 7 Innovative Ways To Get Your Customers To Check In Wherever They Are (McGraw-Hill), says, “Many businesses are motivated to join social media out of fear. They’re afraid of being left behind, and that’s the only reason they do it. They create social media pages and promotions with no clear objective. They just do it to do it.” Carmine raises a good point. If a small business wants to compete, why do it out of fear or desperation to keep up? It is as if the engine is running, but nobody is behind the wheel (pardon the pun). One way of looking at the ROI on social media is that if you don’t participate, you run a really good risk of being irrelevant in five years. The other way is less of an excuse and to me the greatest incentive. There actually is a return and it is easy to measure. Foursquare is one one tool that has received a lot of buzz. What exactly is it? Being a non-expert on the topic, I spoke with Cindy Morrison, social media strategist and founder of Socialvention , which helps companies reinvent themselves through social media campaigns that deliver solid results, such as gaining more Twitter followers, or by utilizing Foursquare to get more customers in the door. Cindy explains, “Foursquare is a social media platform where you pinpoint your location by ‘checking in’ at restaurants, stores, or other attractions. You can see if friends are nearby so you can meet up and write reviews or tips about businesses.” She adds, “I show my clients how to literally use it to motivate nearby potential customers with special Foursquare offers and discounts. Targeting buyers when they’re already in the neighborhood is half the battle. And the fact that they get the offer right in the palm of their hand (on their smart phone)? Brilliant!” I was slightly skeptical, and so I challenged Cindy to explain how this makes any sense. Why not just stand around in the neighborhood and hand out flyers? I asked. She replied, “While some see ‘checking in’ at a location on Foursquare as a silly game, it’s actually a great marketing tool. You can literally motivate a potential customer who’s nearby to try your product. The more they ‘check-in’ to locations, it helps them gain followers and fans via social media. So, everyone can win. They write about your company, you get free advertising, and they get discounts. For instance, when I recently checked in on Foursquare at the DFW airport, I was immediately offered a discount coupon to eat at a restaurant there. There was no doubt in my mind where I’d be spending time between flights.” VERY interesting. So, the very places that I frequent, there just might be a deal for me? Has social media encouraged businesses to discount products and services just to get someone to try them out? Sounds like a no-brainer! Carmine and Cindy make some very valid and interesting points. If you are going to commit to doing something, make sure you do it right. Besides, a small business does not have the extra time or money (like the Great Dane big business does) to waste on running campaigns that in the end hurt them rather than help their bottom line. I am considering joining Foursquare; maybe I can snag some nice deals when I am in a neighborhood? In the end, small businesses are not as at much a disadvantage as many have thought. With a little determination and the willingness to try something new (trial by error doesn’t hurt so much), small businesses have an opportunity available to them that they never had before. The ability to connect directly with their target customer is taking on a whole new meaning these days. Not only is social media a free marketing (and promotional tool), it can be extremely useful if used appropriately and not in haste. And just maybe, we are not in a social media bubble as many seem to be pondering now; There is so much for us to delve into and discover. Keeping up with trends is not just a cliché statement anymore. Certainly, there are a few tricks that this old dog (me) can learn. So, to you small business owners out there (and big businesses — I didn’t forget about you!), watch your step, the customer is walking through the door and about to deliver something to you. Just make sure you get them wanting to come back!

Read the full article →

The Center for Public Integrity: As they lobby for a tax holiday, some big multinational players say they’ve got plenty of cash on hand

November 4, 2011

By John Aloysius Farrell and Aaron Mehta , iWatch News As select U.S. multinational corporations push for a tax holiday on a trillion dollars parked overseas, their own recent financial reports undermine the arguments they are making for preferential treatment on Capitol Hill. Proponents of the tax break for “repatriated” overseas earnings say that bringing the money home will give U.S. corporations an infusion of cash, stimulating investment and creating jobs. But an iWatch News survey of some major players in the tax repatriation debate found that corporations, far from being cash-starved, are sitting on billions of dollars of liquid assets. In new filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission and conference calls with Wall Street analysts, some big players flatly say they don’t need the tax holiday. Firms like Microsoft and Oracle, Google and Apple have tens of billions in cash stashed offshore, and lots more here at home. “We currently do not intend nor foresee a need to repatriate these funds,” the Microsoft Corp. said in its latest quarterly report . “We expect existing domestic cash, cash equivalents, short-term investments, and cash flow from operations to continue to be sufficient.” Microsoft said it had $57.4 billion in cash and other liquid sources on hand, with $51 billion of that kept overseas. Though it rests in offshore accounts, the lion’s share of Microsoft’s money is already invested in U.S. assets. The firm says it has socked 83 percent of the billions it holds offshore in U.S. government securities, U.S. corporate bonds and U.S. mortgage-backed securities. The story was much the same at Google Inc., which reported its corporate coffers held $42.6 billion, with $20.2 billion of that stashed overseas. “Our intent is to permanently reinvest these funds outside of the U.S. and our current plans do not demonstrate a need to repatriate them,” Google said. “Our sources of funding will be sufficient to satisfy our currently anticipated cash requirements through at least the next 12 months.” Google and Microsoft are members of WIN America , a coalition of US multinationals and trade groups pushing for the tax break. The holiday could cost the U.S. Treasury as much as $80 billion , one reason why its prospects are mixed as Washington remains inundated by a lake of red ink. Yet 80 members of Congress, both Republicans and Democrats, have signed up as co-sponsors . Some 70 of those co-sponsors have received almost a million dollars in campaign contributions from WIN-affiliated companies since the start of 2009. WIN and its members have spent millions lobbying Congress, and employ dozens of lobbyists, to press for the tax break, iWatch News has reported. Need aside, the payoff could be huge. A similar tax holiday in 2004 cut the 35 percent corporate tax rate to 5.25 percent for repatriating companies. American firms face a 35 percent corporate income tax at home, but money earned overseas is taxed only by the country of origin until it is returned to the United States, at which time an additional tax is levied to make up any difference and restore the rate to 35 percent. If the rate was dropped to 5 percent, “the amount of corporate cash that would come flooding into the country could be…used for creating jobs, investing in research, building plants, purchasing equipment and other uses,” wrote John Chambers, the CEO of Cisco Systems, and Safra Catz, the president of Oracle Corp., in an op-ed last year in The Wall Street Journal . However, after a number of deductions and tax breaks are employed, the effective tax rate for U.S. corporations is often much lower. And critics of the repatriation proposal, pointing to a previous tax holiday in 2004 , say that the influx of cash will not create jobs, but will be spent instead to benefit shareholders and corporate executives, via higher dividends and stock repurchasing plans. “They should use the cash they already have here at home to invest in America rather than ask for still another break,” Sen. Carl Levin, D-Mich., chairman of the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, told iWatch News . U.S. firms are flush with cash, analysts from the Heritage Foundation noted last month, and can easily borrow at bargain rates if they need to raise funds. “The repatriation holiday would have little or no effect on investment and job creation, the key to the whole issue, simply because the repatriating companies are not capital-constrained today,” the Heritage report said. “Any investment, any action that they would deem worthwhile today can be and is being financed by current and accumulated earnings.” Apple Inc. is a prime example. In its latest annual report , filed on Oct. 26, Apple noted record sales and profits, and plans to expand its network of retail stores and its lines of iconic products. But Apple does not need a tax break to finance its plans for expansion. The firm’s report shows that it is sitting on some $81 billion in cash and cash equivalents, up 60 percent during 2011. America’s education system, not taxes, is what keeps Apple from employing more Americans, according to a new biography of the late Apple founder Steve Jobs. Author Walter Isaacson recounts that Jobs told President Obama that the company employed 700,000 workers in China, instead of the United States, because of a lack of qualified American engineers. Other cash-rich firms have been acquiring new subsidiaries and letting go “redundant workers,” or distributing wealth to shareholders and corporate executives. Another prominent member of the WIN America coalition is Pfizer, the pharmaceutical firm that manufactures such popular products as Lipitor and Viagra. Speaking to Wall Street analysts on Tuesday, the firm’s executives were focused on slimming down its workforce, and buying back shares – not creating jobs. “We are…focused on shareholder value,” CEO Ian Read told the analysts. The company hopes to boost its dividends, and has spent $6.5 billion this year repurchasing shares of the company’s stock as part of an ongoing buyback program that it hopes will reach $9 billion this year. Meanwhile, the Pfizer executives said they cut 4,100 jobs in 2011, as part of an ongoing company-wide purge of redundant positions from recent acquisitions. Pfizer was the single biggest benefactor of the 2004 tax holiday, when it took advantage of a cut-rate “one time” 5.25 percent tax rate to bring back $37 billion from overseas. In a paper for the nonpartisan New America Foundation , cited by WIN America, economist Laura D’Andrea Tyson and two Berkeley associates say that the trickle-down effects from rewarding stockholders could be significant. Tyson and her colleagues acknowledge that 74 percent of the money brought back to the US in a tax holiday would probably be distributed to shareholders in the form of dividend payments or stock repurchases. But for every dollar returned to a stockholder, Tyson says, from 25 to 40 cents will be used by higher-income Americans to go shopping. The boost to the economy, when combined with direct hiring and investment, could ultimately lead to the creation of between 1.3 million and 2.5 million jobs. Tyson serves on the board of directors of Kodak, a member of the WIN America group. Eric Schmidt, the executive chairman of Google, serves as chairman of the New America Foundation. WIN America, when asked to comment, declined. Microsoft also rewarded shareholders. It spent $1 billion in the 90 days prior to its Sept. 30 report buying 38 million shares as part of its ongoing stock repurchase program. A similar tale was told by software giant Oracle. “Our current cash…will be sufficient to meet our working capital, capital expenditures and contractual obligation requirements,” Oracle reported to the SEC. And “we could fund any future acquisitions, dividend payments and repurchases of common stock or debt with our internally available cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities, cash generated from operations, additional borrowings or from the issuance of additional securities.” Oracle is in the midst of an $8 billion stock repurchase program, and purchased 27.5 million shares for $823 million in the three months ending Aug. 31. It is paying dividends and has its own robust merger and acquisition strategy, which in recent years has led to thousands of layoffs. Though not as flush as Apple, Cisco Systems reported that it held $44 billion in cash, with $39.8 billion of that stashed overseas. The company used $6.8 billion last year to benefit shareholders in the latest stage of a long term $82 billion stock repurchasing plan. At the same time, Cisco said, it was paring its workforce by 6,500 employees to beef up its bottom line. Requests for comment, by phone to Microsoft and Pfizer and by email to Google, were not returned. Continue this story and read more investigations at iWatch News

Read the full article →

Occupy Protesters Plan To Greet Scott Walker In Chicago

November 3, 2011

Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker will be in Chicago early Thursday to address Chicago’s Union League Club — and Occupy Chicago protesters plan to meet him there. Walker, who made many enemies by stripping unions of their collective bargaining rights, faces a potential recall and dwindling approval ratings in his home state, but he still has some powerful fans. From the Union League Club’s invitation: Faced with mounting deficits and busted budgets, the freshman Governor took on powerful political interests – and won. In this talk, Governor Walker will review the challenges confronting Wisconsin (hint: they will sound familiar to Illinois residents), and what he proposes to overcome them. New realities are overtaking established institutions — meet one of the young governors who is shaping the future of states in our federal system. The breakfast program starts at 7:30 a.m., and protesters from the Occupy Chicago Labor Committee plan to meet outside the Union League Club at 7:15 a.m. “Confront Scott Walker with the truth: His attacks on the middle class aren’t welcome in Illinois,” the Occupy Chicago Labor Committee says on its Facebook page . “When Walker tried to take away collective bargaining rights and divide Wisconsin workers, it was Illinois that took in Wisconsin Democratic Senators with open arms. We say NO to Governor Walker!” More than 150 protesters showed up outside a political fundraiser in West Des Moines, Iowa last week, where Walker was the keynote speaker. Reporters were not allowed into the Iowa event, but were later sent a statement through the Wisconsin Republican Party explaining that Walker was in Iowa to discuss the “successes” of his “recently enacted budget reforms.”

Read the full article →

Occupy Oakland Strike Rallies Movements Across Country

November 3, 2011

OAKLAND, Calif. — Thousands of Occupy Wall Street protesters escalated their tactics beyond marches, rallies and tent camps Wednesday and moved to disrupt the flow of goods at the nation’s fifth-busiest port. Protesters were arrested as they held a sit-in at the headquarters of cable giant Comcast in Philadelphia. Military veterans marched in uniform in New York, angry at their dim job prospects. And parents and their kids, some in strollers, formed a “children’s brigade” to join the Oakland, Calif. rallies. (SCROLL DOWN FOR LIVE UPDATES) “There’s absolutely something wrong with the system,” said Jessica Medina, a single mother who attends school part time and works at an Oakland cafe. “We need to change that.” In Los Angeles, New York and other cities, demonstrators planned their own rallies in solidarity with the Oakland protesters, who called for Wednesday’s “general strike” after the city became a rallying point last week when an Iraq War veteran was injured in clashes with police. Protesters, city officials and business leaders were optimistic the strike would be peaceful. There was little to no visible police presence all day. At a briefing, officials described the protests as peaceful and orderly and said no arrests had been made. Potentially minimizing any significant disruptions at the port, leaders of the longshoremen’s union said they could not call for members to join the protests under their contract with the port. Organizers say they want to stop the “flow of capital.” The port sends goods primarily to Asia, including wine as well as rice, fruits and nuts, and handles imported electronics, apparel and manufacturing equipment, mostly from Asia, as well as cars and parts from Toyota, Honda, Nissan and Hyundai. On Wednesday morning, the port was operating as normal and most longshoremen had shown up for work, according to port and union officials. Craig Merrilees, spokesman for the International Longshore and Warehouse Union, said its members were not being called to strike, but that they supported the protesters. The members “are supporting the concerns raised by Occupy Oakland and the Occupy movement to speak up for the 99 percent and against the corporate greed that is wrecking America,” Merrilees said. Elsewhere, police in Philadelphia arrested nine protesters who staged a sit-in inside the Comcast lobby. Officers handcuffed them and led into police vans as supporters cheered. One protester, Bri Barton, said she was there because the gleaming Comcast tower represents excessive wealth in a city with many blighted neighborhoods. “It’s hard for me to see this and that existing in the same city,” she said. In New York, about 100 military veterans marched in uniform and stopped in front of the New York Stock Exchange, standing in loose formation as police officers on scooters separated them from the entrance. On the other side was a lineup of NYPD horses carrying officers with nightsticks. “We are marching to express support for our brother, (Iraq war veteran) Scott Olsen, who was injured in Oakland,” said Jerry Bordeleau, a former Army specialist who served in Iraq through 2009. The veterans were also angry that returned from war to find few job prospects. “Wall Street corporations have played a big role in the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan,” said Bordeleau, now a college student. He said private contractors have reaped big profits in those countries. In Boston, college students and union workers marched on Bank of America offices, the Harvard Club and the Statehouse to protest the nation’s burgeoning student debt crisis. They say total outstanding student loans exceed credit card debt, increase by $1 million every six minutes and will reach $1 trillion this year, potentially undermining the economy. “There are so many students that are trying to get jobs and go on with their lives,” said Sarvenaz Asasy of Boston, who joined the march after recently graduating with a master’s degree and $60,000 in loan debt. “They’ve educated themselves and there are no jobs and we’re paying tons of student loans. For what?” The day’s events in Oakland began with a rally outside City Hall that drew more than 3,000 people who spilled into the streets and disrupted the downtown commute. Protesters hung a large black banner that read: “Occupy Everything, DEATH TO CAPITALISM.” The crowd included students, families with young children and many people wearing labor union T-shirts. “Shut down the 1 percent. We are the 99 percent,” they chanted. Oakland let city workers use vacation or other paid time to take part, and officials said about 5 percent took the day off. About 360 Oakland teachers didn’t show up for work, or roughly 18 percent of the district’s 2,000 teachers, officials said. The district has been able to get substitute teachers for most classrooms, and where that wasn’t possible children were sent to other classrooms, he said. “I came here because the schools are in the (same) boat as everyone else,” said Steve Neat, a fifth-grade teacher. “We have five schools being closed here in Oakland. We have class sizes skyrocketing. We have cuts, cuts, cuts, just like everyone else. And the 1 percent, their share of the wealth is growing, and it’s time for that to stop. It’s time for some of that wealth to be shared out to all of society,” he said. Some protesters broke off from the rally to picket at nearby banks. All three banks located within blocks of the plaza were closed, though that didn’t stop protesters from chanting and waving signs outside. At a Citibank branch, more than a dozen protesters blocked the entrance, some with fake $100 bills taped across their faces. They held signs with messages such as “Share the Billions with the Millions.” About 200 people chanted outside a Wells Fargo branch, where graffiti was scrawled on the wall. The messages read “The 1 percent won’t back down” and “Who’s robbing who?” Further away from the rally, vandals shattered a Chase bank branch and splattered ink all over an ATM. Someone later taped a note to the shattered glass that read: “We are better than this. … Sorry, the 99 percent.” In front of the Oakland Public Library, about three dozen parents brought toddlers and school-age children for a stroller march in a “children’s brigade.” Demonstrators handed out signs written as if in a children’s crayon that read “Generation 99% Occupying Our Future.” People attached the signs to their baby backpacks and their strollers. By the time the group made its way to the main rally, it numbered about 200 adults with their children. Like others, Marisol Curiel, an Oakland residents who brought her two sons, ages 2 and 4, in a double stroller, said there was a need to tax the wealthy to benefit families and schools and to make sure there are opportunities and jobs for children when they grow up. “Normally I would be the type of person who would watch it from the sidelines,” she said. “But being able to have a presence and also a chance to be more educated seemed really important. All of this will affect not just now, but our future.” ___ Associated Press writers Garance Burke and Marcus Wohlsen in San Francisco, Beth Duff-Brown in San Francisco, Mark Pratt in Boston, JoAnn Loviglio in Philadelphia, Jon Fahey and Verena Dobnik in New York and Christina Hoag in Los Angeles contributed to this report.

Read the full article →

Occupy Movement Accepts Modest Help From The Left

November 1, 2011

By DAVID B. CARUSO, The Associated Press NEW YORK (AP) — With its noisy drum circle, meandering parades of bandanna-clad youth and disdain for centralized leadership, the Occupy Wall Street encampment sometimes has the ragtag look of a group that is making things up as it goes along and discovering its own purpose along the way. (CLICK HERE OR SCROLL DOWN FOR LATEST UPDATES ) But from the start, the movement has also gotten support from a long list of experienced, well-funded organizations, unions and political committees – sometimes to the discomfort of more radical protesters who worry about their message being co-opted or watered down. After an initial hesitation to get involved, unions from Boston to Los Angeles have sent members to march in the demonstrations and donate air mattresses, food and other supplies. In Oakland, unions representing teachers and government workers are encouraging members to take a day off from work to march with protesters Wednesday. MoveOn.org, a group that has given millions to liberal Democrats, has promoted the demonstrations relentlessly on its Web site and in blast emails. To most of the youthful radicals at the movement’s heart, all this help is welcome, but with a caveat. “This is a movement of individuals, not managed political coalitions,” said Alexa O’Brien, one of the many early organizers who helped get the New York occupation started on Sept. 17. Unions can be great, and their support is “critical,” but they can be corrupt, too, she said. And the Democratic Party, she added, is part of the problem. “If you are going to ask corporations to get out of elections, you have to ask all special interests to get out of elections,” she said. “This movement is about building civic infrastructure for regular citizens.” Today, the group that has now occupied a city park for six weeks shows few signs that it is allowing outside organizations a substantial role in planning its marches, making decisions, or deciding what issues to embrace. But it has also turned to a network of left-leaning organizations for help, some of which have been around since before most of the protesters were born. The group of activists who began meeting to plan the demonstrations in mid-summer included several people who had been involved in an organization called US Uncut, which is affiliated with the Institute for Policy Studies, a Washington think tank that cut its teeth opposing the Vietnam War. When Occupy Wall Street needed an established nonprofit group to help handle incoming donations, which have now topped $500,000, they turned to the Alliance for Global Justice, an entity originally founded in 1979 to build support for the communist Sandinista government in Nicaragua. The National Lawyers Guild, whose members have been representing dissenters, peaceniks, and civil-rights activists since1937, has set up Occupy legal hotlines in 19 cities and been representing protesters arrested across the country. Even the unofficial newspaper of the New York encampment, The Occupy Wall Street Journal, didn’t simply spring organically from the protesters’ base in Zuccotti Park; it is a special edition of the Indypendent, an alternative newspaper that has been publishing for 11 years. All of this support by outside groups has become a rallying point by the movement’s critics, who have accused it being manipulated behind the scenes by government worker unions trying to keep taxes high, or by Democrats trying to use the “class warfare” card in upcoming elections, or by community organizing groups trying to drum up support for government entitlement programs. If that’s happening, there is scant evidence in Occupy Wall Street’s daily organizational meetings, where the demonstrators seem to focus a substantial amount of time and energy on the logistics of keeping the camp running and building an organization. Much of the assistance provided has been more inspirational than operational. Chuck Collins, a senior IPS scholar, said that while US Uncut activists provided a list of media contacts to the demonstrators, produced some graphics, and brought skills they had honed in past protests against “corporate tax dodgers,” the organizing effort was autonomous, with no initial support from organized labor, foundations or other “major institutional players.” IPS Director John Cavanagh said that while was aware that some of his younger colleagues were involved in planning the protest, they did so independently of the institute. The institute didn’t offer any financial assistance, “and I don’t know any other established progressive groups who did,” Cavanagh said. “I will admit honestly that I had doubts as to whether they would have any impact,” he said of his attitude toward the demonstration. Even the editors at Adbusters, the Canadian magazine that came up with the idea for the demonstration and registered the OccupyWallStreet.org website, appear to have had little influence over the movement’s direction. Its subsequent calls for the occupiers to rally behind a demand for a 1 percent global tax on financial transactions has yet to be embraced by the encampment, which has strongly resisted making any specific demands. But that hasn’t stopped groups like unions from jumping on the Occupy bandwagon, and maybe advancing their own agenda. “It’s something that has energized our membership,” said Michael Mulgrew, president of the United Federation of Teachers, which has turned part of its New York headquarters into storage space for the protesters. Strong union participation in an Oct. 5 march in Manhattan made it one of the largest for any “Occupy” event to date. Communication Workers of America political director Bob Master said that while many demonstrators have a political philosophy to the left of the typical trade unionist, “Most of the labor movement in New York recognizes that these young people have sparked a national discussion about issues that are central to our agenda.” Support has also come from groups known for raising large sums for Democratic political candidates – a development that has bothered some demonstrators. MoveOn angered some Occupy protesters with an Oct. 18 fundraising email that asked members to help it build on the momentum created by the protests by chipping in $5. MoveOn’s executive director, Justin Ruben, said the group wasn’t trying to mooch off of the movement. “We’ve been clear about what we’re fundraising for,” he said. “We’re not them. We’re not Occupy Wall Street. We’re very clear that we don’t speak for them. They seem like they are doing a great job getting their voice out. And we want to help.” Democracy for America spokeswoman Levana Layendecker said that while the PAC was prohibited by federal law from giving direct cash assistance to Occupy Wall Street, it was hoping to provide support in other ways, including donating cold-weather sleeping bags and medical supplies. Latest Updates On HuffPost’s Live Blog:

Read the full article →

Tennessee Officials Agree To Stop Arresting Occupy Nashville Protesters

November 1, 2011

By TRAVIS LOLLER, The Associated Press NASHVILLE, Tenn. (AP) — Tennessee officials agreed Monday to stop enforcing a new curfew used to dislodge Occupy Nashville protesters from the grounds around the Capitol. (CLICK HERE OR SCROLL DOWN FOR LATEST UPDATES ) The protesters went to federal court seeking a temporary restraining order against Gov. Bill Haslam, arguing the curfew and arrests of dozens of supporters violated their rights to free speech and freedom of assembly. State Attorney General’s Office Senior Counsel Bill Marett announced at the beginning of a hearing before Judge Aleta Trauger that the state would not fight efforts to halt the policy. The judge said she had already decided to grant the restraining order because the curfew was a “clear prior restraint on free speech rights.” “I can’t think of a more quintessential public forum than Legislative Plaza,” Trauger said. State troopers used the curfew put into place on Thursday to arrest 29 protesters early Friday and 26 people early Saturday. Both times a Nashville magistrate refused to jail the protesters, saying the state didn’t have probable cause to arrest them. They were released with citations. The Nashville protesters are part of the six-week-old Occupy movement, which began in lower Manhattan to decry corporate influence in government and wealth inequality. It has spread to cities large and small across the country and around the world. “This is a huge victory for us because Gov. Haslam has realized the mistake that he made,” Occupy Nashville protester Steve Reiter said. “The mass arrests were totally unnecessary.” Reiter said protesters planned to remain in the plaza “for quite a while.” Marett said his office would meet with the plaintiffs to come to an agreement on health and safety issues. He said the state earlier on Monday returned the property it had seized during the arrests to its owners. The suit says Haslam approved the new curfew after complaints over three misdemeanor violations around Legislative Plaza: “an assault, public urination and an apparent tryst beneath a magnolia tree.” Shortly before the hearing, Tennessee Republican Party Chairman Chris Devaney issued a statement calling it “astonishing” that some Democrats had shown support for Occupy Nashville. While he does not mention specific legislators, Democratic Rep. Mike Stewart of Nashville on Saturday called on the governor to rescind the curfew. Devaney’s statement reads, “Legislative Plaza is the property of all Tennesseans, not just a small group of loiterers who would’ve served their cause better by simply occupying a restroom, instead of showing utter disregard for public property.” The two sides have until Nov. 21 to reach an agreement or go back to court for a hearing on a preliminary injunction. Latest Updates On HuffPost’s Live Blog:

Read the full article →

Adrienne Parks: Bullying Part Deux: Occupy Wall Street and the Gay Movement

October 31, 2011

What does the gay movement have to do with Occupy Wall Street? We have a once-empowered class of people challenging powerful bullies. That should sound only too familiar. This is one of those perfect Buckminster Fuller moments of critical mass, a time like when the labor movement initially stood up, Vietnam-era anti-war protesters said, “Enough,” feminists marched for equality, and the Stonewall men said, “No more.” It will be difficult to put our economic-collapse genie back in the bottle. Could the bully power of the 1 percent be why America has fallen so pathetically behind the rest of the world in, well, everything? Because the power to bully is the power to subjugate creativity, entrepreneurial interests, religious tolerance, out-of-the-box thinking, and society at large. Even if we all deluded ourselves into thinking we had a level playing field, it gave us hope, not to mention those great motivators: idealism, that sense of fairness owed, wrongs to be righted. Or our drive to succeed or exceed society’s expectations. Yet we have to ask: is that what America is still about? Believing in the mythical fairness of Wall Street? Of society? A patriarchal ownership of the very financial institutions that now underwrite our political campaigns, judicial process, religions, and corporate America. The 1 percent has proven it does not play fairly. Crazily, the sycophants latch on to the 1 percent to feel themselves empowered. They are fooling themselves and implicitly hurting the 99 percent. Seemingly they somehow remain clueless, intentionally or otherwise. We can say with certainty now that the proverbial Wall Street “king” has been revealed to have no clothes. Of economic necessity, good old-fashioned American democracy has come under scrutiny by soccer moms, apple pie, laid-off workers, and the rest of the educated disenfranchised. These were the very dreamers who drank the Democratic “Kool-Aid.” They are us — your neighbors, friends, and families who bought the balloon-payment homes, were scammed by the Enrons and the Madoffs, lost pensions and life savings in planned bankruptcies. Their home mortgages are larger than their equity. These are the people who have lost medical benefits. They were simply pink-slipped by corporate employers whose duty was to profit at any cost. They were abruptly dumped into an economic cauldron of Wall Street making. Some individuals, societies, cultures, religions, groups, businesses, and living environments try to find an ideal to which all can agree, find harmony, and live in peace. Not so in an oligarchy, where the very, very few control the many. Is this what America has become? Does “one person, one vote” mean anything anymore if one corporation is equal to, what, a million people, votes, dollars? A billion? Bullying is used to quell. Right-wingers brandish claims that OWS is voiceless, without a leader, and thus without power to effect change. The same was said of most great change movements. Every voice must steep and brew. Direction is found. Vowels come together. Consonants unite. There is strength in words that create sentences that lob paragraphs and whole essays at bullies. It was such with the labor, anti-war, feminist and gay movements; such I believe it will be with OWS. It is in gestation. It is forming, in the parks, on the streets, at the steps of important buildings. In the empty wallets, naïve hearts, and angst-ridden minds of the middle classes. Most importantly, in their voices. Humankind does not like to be controlled, manipulated, or especially destroyed. We don’t like having perceived rights denied us or taken away. Bullying makes the 1 percent feel big, taller, better-looking, more capable, richer, wiser, and just perhaps immortal or omnipotent. Extreme conservatives use bullying as their Christianity litmus test. Racists use bullying to justify their actions. Misogynists use bullying to subdue women; homophobes justify their hate speech against the gay community. OWS will continue from these days forward. While authorities might force them from the streets and frigid temperatures drive them inside, the very economy created by the 1 percent has imploded on itself. It is the economy, stupid, to quote James Carville. This woefully sad excuse for our once-wonderful democracy has jump-started inquiring minds. No longer will they bear blind allegiance to fund managers, stock brokers, bankers, and unfair employers. The OWS voices have begun to question and roar. In all likelihood, they cannot be stopped by wind, nor rain, snow, billy clubs, mace, or rubber bullets. They are educated pacifists who can no longer be kept down. The genie is still climbing out of the bottle.

Read the full article →

Michael Moore Fires Back At Critics

October 29, 2011

Michael Moore has a message for Republicans: just because he’s wealthy doesn’t mean he can’t stand with those angry with America’s economic system. The documentary filmmaker, who has been active and vocal in the Occupy Wall Street movement since it began in September, posted on his blog on Thursday a response to conservatives who criticize the seeming juxtaposition between his personal wealth and his involvement in a movement that seeks to balance fiscal inequity in the United States. Noting that he was once an unemployed striver in Flint, Michigan, Moore laid out a basic set of guidelines that he has followed since the success of his film “Roger & Me” in 1989. Included were paying his full taxes, give a large chunk of his money to charity and avoid owning stock on the principle that he’d make money from work, not on the fiscal wrangling of Wall Street that hurt so many members of the middle class. Moore then defended his views in an historical context: “I make my money the old school, honest way by making things. Some years I earn a boatload of cash. Other years, like last year, I don’t have a job (no movie, no book) and so I make a lot less. ‘How can you claim to be for the poor when you are the opposite of poor?!’ It’s like asking: ‘You’ve never had sex with another man — how can you be for gay marriage?! I guess the same way that an all-male Congress voted to give women the vote, or scores of white people marched with Martin Luther Ling, Jr. … It is precisely this disconnect that prevents Republicans from understanding why anyone would give of their time or money to help out those less fortunate. The blog came after Moore squared off with Piers Morgan the night before, with Morgan also going after Moore’s wealth in an attempt to discredit his activism. “I am devoting my life to those who have less and who have been crapped upon by the system,” he said. “And that’s how I spend my time, my energy, my money on trying to up-end this system that I think is a system of violence, it’s a system that’s unfair to the average working person of this country.” He also noted that, given that the 1% made over a million dollars per year, he was not a member of that group. Moore on Friday visited Occupy Oakland , where he paid tribute to Scott Olsen, the Iraq war veteran who was beaten by authorities and remains in hospitalized. “We’ve killed despair across the country and we’ve killed apathy,” he told the crowd there . To read the entire blog, click over to Moore’s website .

Read the full article →

Obama’s Efforts To Aid Homeowners Fall Shorts

October 24, 2011

It was a critical plan to jump-start the economy. President Obama pledged at the beginning of his term to boost the nation’s crippled housing market and help as many as 9 million homeowners avoid losing their homes to foreclosure. Nearly three years later, it hasn’t worked out.

Read the full article →

The World’s Most Stolen Food? Say Cheese

October 22, 2011

Move over Kobe beef and aged whiskey . It turns out cheese is the most stolen food in the world, says a recent global study. That’s the finding of a new report by the U.K.’s Center for Retail Research , which surveyed 1,187 retailers representing more than 250,000 retail outlets across 43 countries. The figures showed 4% of cheese went missing from store shelves. “The biggest threats for retailers are employees and shoplifters,” said Dr. Joshua Bamfield, Director of the Center for Retail Research in a phone interview with The Huffington Post. With the price of cheese rising, Bamfield says this is far from surprising given it could be seen as “a lucrative business opportunity for small time criminals.” “It’s not just grannies saying, I need some cheese I’ll just go and steal it. A lot of the theft is for resale and a lot of this cheese will be resold into other markets or to restaurants.” Other “high risk” foods to make the most stolen food list include fresh meat, chocolate, alcohol, seafood and infant formula. Though the National Retail Federation does a survey each year on retail crime in the U.S., it doesn’t track the most stolen goods and even found it unexpected to learn cheese topped the list. “Yes, I’m surprised. For a gut check I called one of the largest grocery chains in the U.S. and they were surprised as well,” said Joseph LaRocca from the National Retail Federation in an email to The Huffington Post. Instead, LaRocca expected a less lucrative item to trump cheese. “Every sector of retail has their ‘target items’….If I had to make a personal guess, it would be chewing gum,” LaRocca added. But it shouldn’t really come as that much of a surprise that cheese is that sought after. Remember the cheese thieves of Oregon, who stole $600 of gouda and blue cheese wheels ? Either way, theft is a growing concern for retailers, especially since the annual amount of stolen retail goods increased by 6.6% since June 2010. But theft also adds to the global average family grocery shopping bill by an extra $200. In the U.S., that figure was $435, noted the report.

Read the full article →

Median Income Falls To 10-Year Low As Number Of Millionaires Grows

October 20, 2011

Americans’ incomes are falling, perhaps a reason why pessimism about their personal finances is now the lowest it’s been in a decade. The median income fell in 2010 for the second year in a row to $26,364 , a 1.2 percent drop from 2009, and the lowest level since 1999, according to David Cay Johnston at Reuters. Meanwhile, U.S. households are growing increasingly concerned about their finances with more than 20 percent of adult Americans rating their financial situation as “poor,” a Gallup poll finds. That’s a larger share than the 16 to 19 percent of Americans who viewed their finances as poor during and after the recession. It’s also the highest percentage since 2001, the first year of the survey, according to Gallup. In some ways, the financial crisis has taken more of a toll on the employed during the recovery. Indeed, Americans’ incomes have fallen more during the recovery than they did during the recession. Incomes dropped 6.7 percent during the recovery between June 2009 and June 2011, compared to a 3.2 percent drop during the recession from December 2007 to June 2009, a study from former Census Bureau officials found. And it will take some time to get incomes back to where they were before the recession. The U.S. median income has declined 7 percent in the last 10 years and while economists expect incomes to rise over the next decade, it likely won’t be enough to return to pre-recession income levels, the Wall Street Journal reports. Not everyone is suffering, however. The number of workers making $1 million or more actually rose to nearly 94,000 last year from 78,000 in 2009, according to Reuters. Still, most employed workers don’t expect much in the near future. Nine out of 10 American workers say they don’t expect to get a salary increase in the next year that will be enough to compensate for rising food and fuel prices, a June American Pulse survey found. Meanwhile, Gallup’s Basic Necessities Index — a measure of Americans’ access to food, shelter and health care — fell earlier this month to lows on par with recession levels. Corporations may finally be feeling the pain of a sluggish recovery too, MSNBC reports. As CEOs continue to report their company earnings for the last quarter, their outlooks for the future will likely include belt-tightening measures , according to MSNBC.

Read the full article →

Don McNay: How My Business Grew Via Word of Mouth Marketing

October 19, 2011

Building a Business by Word of Mouth Many businesses can prosper by word of mouth advertising. Kentucky Guardianship Administrators (a group I founded and own) is one that did. In 1990, The Louisville Courier-Journal did a series of articles about guardianship theft. Parents of children receiving money from an injury settlement or inheritance were usually selected to handle their child’s funds, even if they had no background in handling money themselves. The Courier-Journal reported several horror stories where parents took their own children’s money. The parents blew it on drugs, limo rides and other things that did not benefit their child. Even more children’s money was lost by parents with no financial experience making poor investment choices. The Guardianship Reform Act of 1990 enabled District Courts to appoint outside parties as conservators for children’s money. It permitted judges to direct money into a blocked bank account, trust or annuity. We set up Kentucky Guardianship Administrators LLC to serve as conservators and assist in setting up special needs trusts. I spoke to a number of legal groups and got them interested in how the concept would help their clients. With Judge Stanley Billingsley, I co-authored several articles in legal publications to help people understand all the things a conservator can do. A conservator is often called on to testify at trial. The job is to let the jury know that an award will be protected and spent on the injured child rather than by others trying to get their hands on it. According to the Kentucky Trial Court Review, few verdicts in injury cases are for over a million dollars. However, several of my early cases as conservator resulted in million or multimillion dollar verdicts or high profile settlements. The high profile nature of the verdicts, and our involvement, helped to advance the business. Even in the days before social media, the word still got around. In 1998, Kentucky Guardianship Administrators added a new service administrating qualified settlement funds. If you want to learn more about the nuances of qualified settlement funds, read “Is a Qualified Settlement Fund Right For Your Client,” an article in Trial Magazine that I co-authored with attorney William Garmer. Qualified settlement funds are normally used to administer funds for large mass torts. Most of our business has been done using smaller qualified settlement funds with just a few claims or claimants. Adding a new service allows our “word of mouth” marketing to build. Another important factor helpful to growing a business by word of mouth is having a semi-monopoly. Kentucky Guardianship Administrators was the only business of its kind when it was formed. In the past few years, a number of people have tried to become conservators and administer qualified settlement funds. That opened up a whole new line of business: cleaning up the messes that others have made. Several times, we have been called in after an inexperienced financial person was unable to get a qualified settlement fund approved or a guardianship set up. Since a prominent Kentucky Supreme Court decision in 2010, Branham v. Stewart, trial attorneys live in fear of messing up a guardianship and being sued for legal malpractice. Branham v. Stewart was considered one of the ten most important Kentucky Supreme Court decisions of 2010. In that case, the court allowed a legal malpractice case to proceed against a good attorney for errors he allegedly made regarding the guardianship process. That case spurred a lot of interest in finding experienced conservators and making sure guardianships were set up correctly. By creating a unique niche, developing expertise in that niche and having a useful service, our business grew without spending marketing or advertising dollars. Some call word of mouth advertising “bootstrap marketing,” Our decision to go that route was common sense. The concept of guardianship, conservators and qualified settlement funds are hard to explain in an “elevator pitch.” Attorneys started telling other attorneys about the group. It was the path to growth. Growing by word of mouth is a path that any business can emulate. Don McNay, CLU, ChFC, MSFS, CSSC is the bestselling author of the book Wealth Without Wall Street: McNay, who lives in Richmond Kentucky, an award-winning financial columnist and Huffington Post Contributor. You can learn more about him at www.donmcnay.com He is the Chairman of the Board for the McNay Settlement Group (www.mcnay.com) which provides structured settlement consulting for injury victims, lottery winners, and the families of special needs children. McNay founded Kentucky Guardianship Administrators LLC, which assists attorneys in as conservators and setting up guardianship’s. It is nationally recognized as an administrator of Qualified Settlement (468b) funds.

Read the full article →

Mohamed A. El-Erian: America at Stall Speed?

October 19, 2011

Judging from the skittishness of both markets and “consensus expectations,” the United States’ economic prospects are confusing. One day, the country is on the brink of a double-dip recession; the next, it is on the verge of a turbo-charged recovery, powered by resilient consumers and US multinationals starting to deploy, at long last, their massive cash reserves. In the process, markets take investors on a wild rollercoaster ride, with the European crisis (riddled with even more confusion and volatility) serving to aggravate their queasiness. This situation is both understandable and increasingly unsettling for America’s well-being and that of the global economy. It reflects the impact of fundamental (and historic) economic and financial re-alignments, insufficient policy responses, and system-wide rigidities that frustrate structural change. As a result, there are now legitimate questions about the underlying functioning of the US economy and, therefore, its evolution in the months and years ahead. One way to understand current conditions — and what is needed to improve them — is to consider two events that recently attracted considerable worldwide attention: the launch of Boeing’s Dreamliner passenger jet and the tragic death of Apple’s Steve Jobs. Let us start with some simple aeronautic dynamics, using an analogy that my PIMCO colleague, Bill Gross, came up with to describe the economic risks facing the American economy. For the Dreamliner to take off, ascend, and maintain a steady altitude, it must do more than move forward. It has to move forward fast enough to exceed critical physical thresholds, which are significantly higher than those for most of Boeing’s other (smaller) planes. Failure would mean succumbing to a mid-air stall, with tepid forward motion giving way to a sudden loss of altitude. Unless we are convinced of the Dreamliner’s ability to avoid stall speed, it makes no sense to talk about all the ways in which it will enhance the travel experience for millions of people around the world. America’s economy today risks stall speed. Specifically, the question is not whether it can grow, but whether it can grow fast enough to propel a large economy that, according to the US Federal Reserve, faces “balance-sheet deleveraging, credit constraints, and household and business uncertainty about the economic outlook.” And, remember, it is just over a year since certain US officials were proclaiming the economy’s “summer of recovery” — a view underpinned by the erroneous belief that America was reaching “escape velocity.” Stall speed is a terrifying risk for an economy like that of the US, which desperately needs to grow robustly. Without rapid growth, there is no way to reverse persistently high and increasingly structural (and therefore protracted) unemployment; safely de-leverage over-indebted balance sheets; and prevent already-disturbing income and wealth inequalities from growing worse. The private sector alone cannot and will not counter the risk of stall speed. What is desperately needed is better policymaking. Specifically, policymakers must be open and willing to understand the unusual challenges facing the US economy, react accordingly, and possess sufficiently potent policy instruments. Unfortunately, this has been far from the case in America (and in Europe, where the situation is worse). Moreover, US policymakers in the last few weeks have been more interested in pointing fingers at Europe and China than in recognizing and responding to the paradigm shifts that are at the root of the country’s economic problems and mounting social challenges. This is where the insights of Steve Jobs, one of the world’s best innovators and entrepreneurs, come in. Jobs did more than navigate paradigm shifts; he essentially created them. He was a master at converting the complicated into the simple; and, rather than being paralyzed by complexity, he found new ways to deconstruct and overcome it. Teamwork was an obligation, not a choice. And he eschewed the search for the single “big bang” in favor of aiming for multiple breakthroughs. Underlying it all was a willingness to evolve — a drive for perfection through experimentation. Moreover, he excelled at selling to audiences worldwide both his vision and his strategy for realizing it. So far, America’s economic policymakers have fallen short on all of these fronts. Rather than committing to a comprehensive set of urgently-needed reinforcing measures, they seem obsessed with the futile search for the one “killer app” that will solve all of the country’s economic problems. No surprise that they have yet to find it. Teamwork has repeatedly fallen hostage to turf wars and political bickering. Little has been done to deconstruct structural complexity, let alone win sufficient public support for a medium-term vision, a credible implementation strategy, and a set of measures that is adequate to the task at hand. The longer the policymaking impasse persists, the greater the stall-speed risk for an economy that already has an unemployment crisis, a large budget deficit, many underwater mortgages, and policy interest rates floored at zero. This is an atmosphere in which unhealthy balance sheets come under even greater pressure, and healthy investors refuse to engage. In the process, the risk of recession remains uncomfortably high, the unemployment crisis deepens, and inequities rise as already-stretched social safety nets prove even more porous. Mohamed A. El-Erian is CEO and co-CIO of PIMCO, and author of When Markets Collide. This post originally appeared at Project Syndicate and is reprinted here with the author’s permission. Copyright: Project Syndicate, 2011. www.project-syndicate.org

Read the full article →

BofA Reports First Increase In Customer Late Payments In A Year

October 17, 2011

NEW YORK (AP) — Bank of America Corp. on Monday reported a small increase in customer late payments for September. It was the first increase Bank of America reported for delinquencies, as they are known in the industry, in a year, and echoed similar increases reported by other major card issuers. Delinquencies are an important indicator of future default. The credit card division of the Charlotte, N.C.-based bank said in a regulatory filing that the rate its customers’ payments were late by 30 days or more rose to 3.99 percent of balances on an annualized basis, from 3.96 percent in August. The bank also said in the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission that the rate it wrote off credit card balances last month dropped to 5.99 percent of balances, annualized, from 6.79 percent in August. That was the first time the default rate dropped below 6 percent since before the 2008 financial crisis. Bank of America still has among the highest rate of default, or charge-offs, in the industry. But it is down substantially from the 14.53 percent the bank reported in August 2009. American Express Co. on Monday reported a slight increase in its late payment rate last month. But American Express’ late payments are still the lowest in the credit card industry. Credit card companies typically write off balances after they are 180 days past due, the point at which the companies assume they won’t be able to collect. Bank of America Corp. shares fell 16 cents, or 2.6 percent, to close at $6.03 on Monday. Markets were broadly lower, and the Dow Jones industrial average fell 2.1 percent.

Read the full article →

Immigrants To Wells Fargo: Stop Investing In For-Profit Detention

October 17, 2011

Latino and Somali immigrants are organizing in Minneapolis, Minn., against Wells Fargo, telling the bank to stop donating to anti-immigrant politicians and investing in private prison corporations while courting immigrant customers. About 150 people, many of them Wells Fargo customers and Latino or Somali immigrants, gathered outside a Wells Fargo branch on Saturday to protest the bank. The protest was part of a larger effort by 84 advocacy groups calling for Wells Fargo to divest its money from companies that profit off of immigrant detention. The protesters called Wells Fargo hypocritical for targeting Latinos and immigrant customers while also giving money to causes that immigrants largely oppose, such as private immigrant detention centers and bills that make it difficult to migrate legally to the United States. Wells Fargo uses its mutual funds to invest in two of the largest for-profit detention companies: Corrections Corporation of America and the GEO Group, both of which spend millions each year lobbying for stricter immigration enforcement. “On the one hand, Wells Fargo is launching coordinated ad campaigns around the country to recruit scores of new immigrant customers,” said Greg Nammacher, secretary-treasurer of Service Employees International Union Local 26, one of the organizers of a Saturday protest against the bank. “On the other hand, they’re financing the criminalization of immigrants through both support of anti-immigrant politicians and investing in companies like [Corrections Corporation of America].” The two private prison companies, along with a third major company called Management and Training Corporation, profit a combined $5 billion from immigrant detention, according to Brave New Foundation’s “Immigrants for Sale” project . They have acknowledged that a slower pace of immigration enforcement would hurt their bottom line, with Corrections Corporation of America writing in its 2010 annual report that “the relaxation of enforcement efforts” could reduce demand for their services. Both companies have been accused of cutting corners and hiring guards and workers who mistreat immigrant detainees. As of December 2010, Wells Fargo had invested $5.9 million in Corrections Corporation of America and $88.7 million in the GEO Group, In These Times reported in July. Wells Fargo said its critics were misinformed that it invested its own funds in Corrections Corporation of America or the GEO Group, and said that any investments in the companies were made by Wells Fargo mutual funds using money from clients. “Wells Fargo respects the seriousness of our country’s ongoing debate on immigration reform,” Wells Fargo spokesman John Roehm said in a statement. “However, we do not, as a corporation, take positions on public policy issues that do not directly affect our company’s ability to serve customers and support team members.” Wells Fargo launched a new effort in April to gain Latino customers by educating them about banking in 13 cities. The bank also runs Spanish-language ads targeting potential Latino customers. Meanwhile, they have not responded to appeals from immigration advocacy groups to divest their money from the companies, Nammacher said. “The immigrant community has no intention of standing by while Wells Fargo finances their own demise using their own deposits,” he said. “Companies like Wells Fargo that are entrenched in our broken immigration system, they’re either going to be a part of propagating the problem or they’ll be responsible and divest from anti-immigrant corporations and politicians.” The Wells Fargo Employee PAC has donated to politicians who have proposed crackdowns on unauthorized immigration, including Rep. Lamar Smith (R-Texas), an advocate of more immigration enforcement , and Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-Minn.). Bachmann has struck a hard-line stance on undocumented immigration during her campaign for the GOP presidential nomination, promising in a Saturday speech to impose stricter border enforcement if she wins the presidency. Of course, not all immigrants oppose increasing border enforcement or deportations, or favor easier paths to citizenship. But among Latinos, 38 percent of whom are immigrants and 19 percent are undocumented, a strong majority oppose crackdowns on unauthorized immigration, according to 2010 estimates from the Pew Hispanic Center . Most Latinos also support paths to citizenship for undocumented immigrants already in the country, according to the Pew report, a move that politicians like Bachmann decry as amnesty. One protester, Ibrahim Nur, said he was especially angry that the Wells Fargo Employee PAC donated money to Rep. John Kline (R-Minn.), who opposes comprehensive immigration reform. Nur became a citizen six years ago, but wants to see changes to the immigration system so he can more easily bring his family over from Somalia. Nur opened an account at Wells Fargo in 2003, and worked there as a security guard from 2006 until earlier this year. But he may take his money elsewhere now that he knows the Wells Fargo Employee PAC donates money to politicians who oppose immigration reform. “All of the money that I was paying, I realized that was going to a politician named John Kline, who is against immigration stuff,” Nur said. “It takes forever to bring [family] here because of the laws that we have here. … This politician makes it even harder.” CORRECTION: An earlier version of this story stated that Wells Fargo is a stockholder in two of the largest for-profit detention companies. It has been corrected to indicate that Wells Fargo uses its mutual funds to invest in the companies. The story has also been updated to include a comment from Wells Fargo.

Read the full article →

David Axelrod: GOP Doesn’t Understand Wall Street Protests

October 16, 2011

WASHINGTON (AP/The Huffington Post) — A senior political adviser to President Barack Obama is charging that the Republicans seeking the presidency don’t understand the American public’s pent-up anger over corporate excesses. David Axelrod tells ABC’s “This Week” that the American people “want a financial system that works on the level. They want to get a fair shake.” He appeared Sunday, a day after scores of demonstrators protesting corporate business practices were arrested in New York’s Times Square in a confrontation with police. Axelrod faulted Republicans who have been pushing in Congress to soften or repeal the landmark legislation Obama pushed through last year, tightening regulation of business practices. Axelrod said he doesn’t believe “any American is impressed” when hearing GOP presidential candidates who want to “roll back Wall St. reform.” Nearly all of the major Republican presidential contenders have weighed in on the Occupy Wall Street movement. Some, such as Herman Cain and Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-Minn.), say protesters should be directing their anger at the Obama administration rather than big banks and corporations. Appearing Sunday morning on “Fox News Sunday,” House Majority Leader Eric Cantor said it was wrong to blame Wall Street for America’s economic problems, and criticized political leaders who have embraced the movement. “Where I am most concerned is we have elected leaders in this town who are frankly joining in the effort to blame others rather than focus on the policies that have brought about the current situation,” he said. ————— Check out the reactions of the 2012 Republican presidential candidates, President Barack Obama and Vice President Joe Biden reactions to the growing Occupy Wall Street movement:

Read the full article →

SEC Struggles Over Disclosing Which Companies Use ‘Conflict Minerals’

October 16, 2011

WASHINGTON (Sarah N. Lynch) – Securities regulators are struggling to craft a rule that sheds light on companies that use certain African “conflict minerals” but avoids a compliance nightmare that hurts manufacturers. The Securities and Exchange Commission is six months behind schedule in finalizing the rule that is required by last year’s Dodd-Frank financial oversight law. The rule, which was tucked into the legislation at the last minute, will require companies to disclose whether they use tantalum, tin, gold or tungsten from the war-torn Democratic Republic of the Congo. The agency is holding a roundtable discussion on Tuesday to hear from companies, human rights organizations and other stakeholders. The SEC has asked for help navigating the mine field of tricky issues such as tracking conflict minerals through the supply chain and “workable” due diligence. Corporations such as AT&T (T.N) have criticized the rule as overreaching. They say it could trip up companies who contract with manufacturers and have little, if any, control or knowledge about the origins of minor amounts of minerals that end up in their products. Fear about running afoul of the pending reporting rule has already prompted some companies such as Apple Inc (AAPL.O) and Hewlett-Packard Inc (HPQ.N) to stop sourcing from the region. “If you go from compliance on through, this starts to set up not only nightmare scenarios, but also costly scenarios that make it difficult for companies to ensure an adequate supply of raw materials,” said Tom Quaadman, the vice president of the Chamber of Commerce’s Center for Capital Markets Competitiveness. The SEC issued a draft proposal of the rule in December and hopes to finalize it by the end of the year, according to the agency’s website. The challenges of implementing the rule are many. For a start, companies will need to identify whether or not any of the four “conflict minerals” are contained in their products – something that is not always known. Then, if the mineral is present in the manufactured good, the company would have to exercise due diligence to determine where the metal came from. That could mean going through layers upon layers of suppliers, some of whom may be private companies located in third-world countries. And if the metal has been recycled, as gold often is, it could get even trickier to track. “What would be required here is the development of a global compliance infrastructure,” said Brian Cartwright, a senior adviser at Latham & Watkins and former general counsel for the SEC. “The notion is that any public company in the United States will have to file, in annual reports, as an exhibit, a conflict minerals report that has been subject to an independent private sector audit,” said Cartwright. Many companies, business groups and lawyers have urged the SEC to phase in the new rules over time to help make it easier to comply. They also want the SEC to narrow the scope of the rule so that companies are not forced to track trace amounts of minerals. But human rights groups are staunchly opposed to a phase-in period, saying the SEC needs to follow the Dodd-Frank mandate and implement the rule without delay. Because the conflict minerals rule is required by the law, the SEC has little wiggle room to stray from congressional intent. “Businesses should be held accountable for human rights issues, and investors find these concerns to be material in that they, at the end of the day, affect companies’ image and bottom line,” said Amol Mehra, the coordinator of the International Corporate Accountability Roundtable. “All companies need to do… is simply tell us what is in their products.” The SEC must also deal with potential legal challenges to the final rule. The Chamber of Commerce, which in July successfully convinced a federal court to overturn the SEC’s proxy access rule, has its sights on a possible challenge of the conflict minerals rule if the agency does not improve its cost estimates. The agency’s proposal had initially estimated the total paperwork burden of compliance would be $71 million. But the Chamber says that figure is woefully inadequate. The National Association of Manufacturers, a leading trade group fighting the proposal, has estimated the conflict minerals plan could cost industry between $9 to $16 billion to implement. (Reporting by Sarah N. Lynch; Editing by Tim Dobbyn) Copyright 2011 Thomson Reuters. Click for Restrictions .

Read the full article →

WATCH: BofA Branch Reportedly Refuses To Allow Protesters To Close Accounts

October 16, 2011

Should people who are tired of paying extra fees be allowed to close their bank accounts in protest? One Bank of America official reportedly doesn’t think so. According to Addicting Info , two women involved with the Occupy Santa Cruz movement in California walked into a Bank of America branch earlier this week and attempted to close their bank accounts. In response, the bank manager threatened to lock the doors and call the police on them. Her reasoning? You can’t be a customer and a protester at the same time, the manager said. Central Coast News contacted Bank of America about the incident and received a response from the company: Central Coast News has contacted Bank of America to get their side of the story. In an email Colleen Haggerty with Bank of America released this statement to Central Coast News. “It is our responsibility to ensure a safe environment for customers to conduct financial transactions. So, due to the disruptive nature of protests lately and the potential for safety or security issues, we do not allow protestors inside of our banking centers. If a customer who is participating in a protest wishes to conduct bank business, including close an account, we ask them to come back when they are not protesting or they may also conduct their bank business at a nearby branch away from protest activities.” Haggerty also said that Bank of Ameica, “respect everyone’s ability to exercise their first amendment rights, however we also have to balance safety and business needs for all customers.” According to Central Coast News , “The women said that they would return to Bank of America the next day, sans signs, and close their accounts taking their ‘money away from the banking elite and into a local credit union.’” WATCH VIDEO OF THE ENCOUNTER ABOVE

Read the full article →

Democrats’ Deficit Plans Highlight Super Congress Divide

October 13, 2011

WASHINGTON — Democrats in the House offered up their ideas for the budget-slashing super committee Thursday, insisting again that the effort be “balanced” with revenue hikes. Under the law that created the Joint Select Committee on Deficit Reduction, the various committees of the House and Senate are required to submit recommendations to the committee — or the “Super Congress” — by Friday. For the out-of-power Democrats, releasing their ideas a day early amounted to a stunt since they are unlikely to be included in the official House suggestions prepared by the GOP. But the insistence on revenues highlighted the extreme divide that remains between the two parties, and again suggested the likelihood that the 12-member super committee — evenly divided between the chambers and parties — will deadlock over the deficit reduction plan it must submit by Nov. 23. “We want it to be big, we want it to be bold, we want it to be balanced, and in the balance side … we need to have everyone pay their fair share,” said Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.). Republicans have steadfastly insisted that raising taxes is out of the question. The super committee must identify at least $1.2 trillion in deficit reduction over 10 years, and if Congress fails to act by Dec. 23, the Budget Control Act that created the committee requires automatic cuts, starting in 2013, including deep cuts to the military. The Super Congress plan will not be subject to amendment or filibuster, giving the 12 members near-unprecedented power. Still, some have suggested that anything they do could just as easily be undone by a future Congress, since the cuts would not begin immediately. The top Democrats on 16 House committees offered a long list of suggestions, often including closing various tax loopholes. Among the most specific proposals came from Rep. Ed Markey (D-Mass.), the top Democrat on the Natural Resources Commitee, who suggested closing a slew of loopholes to raise more than $50 billion, including from the oil and gas industries. Energy and Commerce Committee ranking member Rep. Henry Waxman (D-Calif.) suggested proposals to spend some $16 billion to create jobs in the short run, and to save some $150 billion over 10 years. Rep. Barney Frank (D-Mass.), the Democrats’ leader on the Finance Committee, offered up fees on “too big to fail” banks, and raising $42 billion by regulating and taxing Internet gambling, among other items. All the letters can be found here.

Read the full article →

House Approves Controversial Trade Deal

October 13, 2011

WASHINGTON — The House has voted to approve a free trade agreement with Panama, a country of less than 4 million that still carries economic weight because of the Panama Canal. The vote on Panama came after the House approved a similar free trade agreement with Colombia and before a vote on a South Korea trade pact. The Senate was to vote on all three later Wednesday. The United States last year exported $6 billion worth of goods to Panama and has minimal imports from that country. But the trade deal will make it easier for U.S. companies to compete for contracts in Panama’s $5.25 billion expansion of the canal. The agreement also strengthens banking transparency in Panama, which has been known as a tax haven. As HuffPost’s Zach Carter reported , Panama has “some of the most stringent bank secrecy laws in the world, making it extremely easy and inexpensive for U.S. citizens to set up offshore corporations and bank accounts. Establishing the corporation and bank account costs less than $2,000, and any money that Americans stash in these entities is not taxed. Bank secrecy laws and extremely lax corporate registration standards make it very difficult for the Internal Revenue Service to track transactions transferring funds to these Panamanian destinations from the United States. Small surprise, then, that Panama is home to nearly 400,000 offshore corporations, more than any other nation except Hong Kong.” Watch Carter discuss the deal on MSNBC’s The Dylan Ratigan Show:

Read the full article →

Obama Shares Round Of Beers With Unemployed Construction Workers

October 12, 2011

ORLANDO, Fla. (AP/The Huffington Post) — President Barack Obama has joined four unemployed construction workers in Florida for a round of beers on a day his jobs bill met defeat on Capitol Hill. Obama met with the group at Harp and Celt Restaurant & Irish Pub in downtown Orlando. He solicited opinions on the jobs situation and said he was trying to figure out how to get the construction trades back to work. The workers – three unemployed pipe fitters and one unemployed plumber – drank Budweiser and Obama had a Guinness. They all toasted: “To more jobs!” Obama held the meeting between fundraisers in Florida as Senate Republicans – and two Democrats – turned back an effort to open debate on the president’s $447 billion jobs bill. Obama says the bill would create construction jobs. The White House Pool Report, written by Carol Lee of the Wall Street Journal , offers some more details: POTUS, with a pint of Guinness, cheers with unemployed construction workers – “To more jobs…” Motorcade was rolling at 6:58 pm and stopped at 7:01 pm for President Obama’s visit with unemployed construction workers an Irish bar in downtown Orlando. When pool entered, Mr. Obama was already seated with the construction workers (names below) and Orlando Mayor Buddy Dyer at a table inside Harp and Celt Restaurant & Irish Pub on Magnolia Avenue. The bar smelled like stale beer. It was mostly empty except some workers, WH staff and a couple of people in the back who appeared to be customers eating and drinking. POTUS and the construction workers sat at a table near the door. The wooden table had a half eaten large plate of nachos in the middle. Apparently the construction workers had been eating them, as they had small plates in front of them. There were 4 bottles of Budweiser on the table. Two were in front of construction workers and one in front of Mr. Dyer and POTUS, but POTUS, then Mr. Dyer, ordered a Guiness instead. One worker had a Corona, and another had a soda. Mr. Obama, seated with his back to the door, was in shirtsleeves. A lifesize cardboard pint of Guiness was propped up behind him in a corner. POTUS told the workers part of the reason he wanted to stop by is because “Buddy and I” are trying to help create jobs. “You guys are what this country’s all about,” Mr. Obama said. POTUS said he wanted to get sense from the unemployed construction workers what they’re seeing, how projects are going. One man told POTUS he had worked at the Amway Center. Pool couldn’t hear much of the conversation. A version of “Landslide” was playing in the bar (not Fleetwood Mac, maybe Smashing Pumpkins?) As the group of six talked, someone brought POTUS a Guinness. “Look at that,” he said, examining it. “Now that looks good.” Mr. Dyer thought so too. “Is that a Guinness?” he said. “Can I get one of those, too?” POTUS then raised his glass and the construction workers raised theirs. “To more jobs,” he said. And they clinked glasses. See more pictures below:

Read the full article →

Credit Unions Back In The Spotlight After BofA Debit Fee Hike

October 7, 2011

NEW YORK — Credit unions are basking in the spotlight again. Whenever a big bank rolls out a controversial fee, customers start fuming about taking their business elsewhere and the attention often falls on credit unions. That happened again last week when Bank of America said it would soon start charging customers a $5 monthly fee to make debit card purchases. This time around, it seems some customers have finally had it. The country’s largest credit union, the Navy Federal Credit Union, said new account openings over the weekend were 23 percent higher than normal. “`We’re getting a lot of calls and messages on our Facebook page about the debit card fees too,” says Tisa Head, who oversees Navy Federal’s savings products. The news may have been the final straw for some because paying to use a debit card was unheard of until this year. The announcement also capped a year of banks pulling back on perks and hiking fees. By contrast, credit unions are known for offering more favorable fees and rates as member-owned nonprofits. Still, the potential inconvenience and a fear of change have a tendency to keep even disgruntled bank customers from making good on their threats to leave. That’s despite the numerous online banks, small community banks and credit unions eager to welcome new customers. For those curious about what exactly a credit union can and can’t offer, here’s the rundown: ___ How They Work To start, there are more than 7,000 credit unions in the country so the fees and level of service will vary greatly. But don’t be overwhelmed; each credit union caters to a specific group, such as company employees, university workers and students or residents of a certain region. Most credit unions also let immediate family members of the target group join. So chances are that you’ll be eligible to join at least one, but narrowing down a long list of possibilities likely won’t be a problem. Joining also means you’ll need to buy a share in the credit union. The typical share value is $5 to $20, according to the Credit Union National Association, a trade group. That money is deposited into a savings account and represents your ownership interest; the money is returned if you decide to leave. About a third of credit unions also charge a one-time joining fee. The median fee is just $1, but it could be as high as $50 Once you home in on a credit union you can join, be sure it offers the service you want. For example, only about half of credit unions offer credit cards. Portfolio management, small business and other services tend to be more common at banks as well. So if you like having all your finances in one place, that might be a deal breaker. If you’re switching from a major national bank, also be sure the credit union you’re considering has a physical presence you can adjust to. Credit unions often participate in a “shared network” of branches. That means members of one credit union can drop in at locations of other credit unions around the country to make deposits or withdrawals. But the options still may not be as expansive as the branch network of a national bank. Many credit unions are also part of ATM networks. The Navy Federal Credit Union, for example, lets members make free withdrawals at about 45,000 ATMs. Even if your credit union doesn’t have a big presence, many members say the sacrifice is worth the more personalized service they get in return. For example, it may be more likely that you’re connected to a live person right away when calling customer service. Over time, you may even become familiarized with the names of the employees who handle specific matters. Fees & Rates Beyond their more intimate feel, however, the main attraction of credit unions for many is the lower fees and rates. A study earlier this year by Bankrate.com, for example, found that free checking is alive and well at the nation’s largest credit unions; three quarters of the top 50 credit unions offered free checking with no strings attached. The trend in the banking industry, by contrast, has been to increasingly require customers to meet certain conditions to qualify for fee waivers. Just 45 percent of banks offered free checking with no strings attached this year. That’s down from 65 percent last year and 76 percent two years ago, according to Bankrate.com. The survey on credit unions also found that nearly half do not require a minimum balance to open an account. Fees rose modestly from last year as well; bounced check fees are up by about a dollar at $26. At banks, the average overdraft fee was $31. The nonprofit status of credit unions means that the fees and rates on credit cards, mortgages and other consumer loans in general tend to be lower. This is in great part because the interest rates they can charge are capped. In most cases, the cap is 18 percent, according to the Credit Union National Association. To get a sense of how the cap affects rates, consider a recent snapshot of the market. Early this year, credit union members were charged interest rates of 10 percent to 17 percent, according to a study by The Pew Charitable Trusts. At banks, customers were charged between 13 percent and 21 percent. There was also a big difference in penalty rates; the typical penalty rate at banks was 30 percent; at credit unions, it was 18 percent. Of course, rates on credit cards, mortgages and other loans won’t always be lower at credit unions. It could be that the particular credit union you’re considering doesn’t offer rates as competitive as your current bank. And the specific rate you’re offered from either banks or credit unions will vary depending on your credit profile. It should also be noted that most credit cards offered by credit unions don’t come with rewards programs. So if your main reason for using a credit card is to earn points, you might be better off with a bank.

Read the full article →

High Income Inequality Helped Early Societies Spread, Study Finds

October 2, 2011

As political rhetoric surrounding “class warfare” heats up, a new study indicates that class stratification may help a society spread. The unequal access to resources that comes with class stratification ultimately pushed societies to migrat e, displacing more egalitarian cultures, according to a study from Stanford University. The study’s findings would indicate the U.S. itself has some expanding left to do; the total net worth of the bottom 60 percent of U.S. households is less than that of Forbes 400 richest Americans . “The fact that unequal societies today vastly outnumber egalitarian societies may not be due to the replacement of the ethic of equality by a more selfish ethic, as originally thought by many researchers,” said Deborah Rogers, the lead author of the study. “Instead, it appears that the stratified societies simply spread and took over, crowding out the egalitarian populations.” But even if stratification helped societies spread during the early era of civilization as the study suggests, rising income inequality could now be hindering economic growth , according to an International Monetary Fund study released earlier this month. If income inequality decreased by 10 percent, the duration of an expected period of economic growth would grow by 50 percent, according to the paper. Americans may support a narrowing in the gap between classes, according to a recent poll by Daily Kos. The poll found that nearly three-quarters of Americans favor taxing households making more than $1 million at higher rate than middle class households. But when President Barack Obama proposed a rule along those lines earlier this month, he was met with accusations that he was stoking “class warfare.” And as the top 1 percent of America’s earners control 40 percent of the wealth , according to Vanity Fair , the ranks of the American poor swelled to its highest level since the Census Bureau started keeping track in the 1950s. A society’s poor absorbs resource instability allowing the ruling class and the overall social structure to stay “in tact,” according to the study. The stability allowed them to spread and outmaneuver more egalitarian societies, the study found. “This is not just an academic exercise,” Rogers said. “Inequalities in socioeconomic status are increasing sharply around the world. Understanding the causes and consequences of inequality and how to reduce it is one of the central challenges of our time.”

Read the full article →

Geithner slams China’s intellectual property policies

September 23, 2011

WASHINGTON (Reuters) – Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner said on Thursday that China is holding to its decades-old strategy to steal American intellectual property, in a pointed statement reflecting U.S. officials’ growing impatience with Beijing. “They have made possible systematic stealing of intellectual property of American companies and have not been very aggressive to put in place the basic protections for property rights that every serious economy needs over time,” Geithner told a forum in Washington. “We’re seeing China continue to be very, very aggressive in a strategy they started several decades ago, which goes like this: you want to sell to our country, we want you to come produce here … if you want to come produce here, you need to transfer your technology to us,” Geithner said. Although unusually direct, Geithner’s comments echo a common refrain from U.S. officials and executives. The new U.S. Ambassador to China, Gary Locke, who has assailed China in the past for its trade practices, has put the defense of U.S. intellectual property among his chief priorities. China has said it would drop some of its “indigenous innovation” rules that have riled foreign companies who say access to government equipment and technology orders hinge on their transferring patents and other intellectual property. But business associations in China argue that enforcement of Beijing’s promises has been spotty, particularly at the local government level, hampering foreign companies’ access to a market estimated to be worth as much as $1 trillion a year. In an offshoot of Washington’s dissatisfaction with Beijing’s trade policies, leaders in Washington have long argued that China’s yuan currency is undervalued, giving Chinese companies a price advantage that costs U.S. jobs. But the foreign business community in China — concerned about what they see as China becoming more closed toward foreign investors in recent years — has argued that the emphasis on yuan revaluation distracts from the most serious issues threatening U.S. business interests. A coalition of 51 U.S. business groups sent a letter dated Wednesday to senators considering a currency bill, urging them to focus more on China’s inadequate protection of intellectual property and restrictions on market access. “… unilateral legislation on this issue would be counterproductive not only to the goals related to China’s exchange rate that we all share, but also to our nation’s broader objectives of addressing the many and growing challenges that we face in China,” the groups said. Piracy and counterfeiting of U.S. software and a wide range of other intellectual property in China cost U.S. businesses alone an estimated $48 billion and 2.1 million jobs in 2009, the U.S. International Trade Commission has said. The United States’ trade deficit with China hit a record $273 billion in 2010 and could top that this year. In May, China was listed for the seventh year by the U.S. Trade Representative’s office as a country with one of the worst records for preventing copyright theft. (Reporting by Rachelle Younglai; Writing by Michael Martina in Beijing; Editing by Don Durfee)

Read the full article →

Oil downside risk rises as economic outlook darkens

September 20, 2011

By Christopher Johnson LONDON (Reuters) – A series of supply squeezes have helped keep oil strong this year but some of them have been short-term factors and could give way to longer-term weakness as the outlook for the world economy and global fuel demand dims. The uprising against Muammar Gaddafi in Libya, production problems in the UK and Norwegian North Sea, lower supplies from Russia, central Asia, Nigeria and Angola have all cut supplies, especially of high quality, light, low sulphur crude oil. More than 2 percent of global oil supply has been lost at a time of buoyant demand from emerging economies such as China, keeping the oil market, in the words of a Merrill Lynch report on Tuesday, as “tight as a drum.” Brent crude has stayed above $100 a barrel for most of the year and hit $127 in April, its highest since 2008. But as economic growth slows in the United States and debt crisis deepens in the euro zone oil demand may be slowing. And the economic downturn is coinciding with the removal of some of the supply issues that have been supporting the market as Libyan oil exports restart and North Sea maintenance ends. “The oil market is caught between bearish macro-economic factors and bullish micro-economic factors in the oil sector itself,” said Julian Lee, senior energy analyst at the Center for Global Energy Studies in London. Many analysts say the twin poles of “micro” strength in the oil market and “macro” weakness from a slowing global economy are strong enough to hold for some time, but others are convinced that a period of serious weakness may be imminent. FUTURES SWITCH “Regardless of the current strength of prompt prices, we think there is room for a downward correction in the coming weeks,” said Christophe Barret, global oil analyst at French Bank Credit Agricole. “The longer-term outlook appears weaker for oil prices. The economic environment remains very weak in Europe and the United States, renewing fears of a significant slowdown in the coming months,” Barret added. One sign of the changing attitude to oil prices can be seen in Brent futures, where spreads between nearby oil futures and forward contracts have switched in recent months with forward prices now at a substantial discount to prompt. While futures prices are not a prediction of where the market will go, they are a reflection of current concerns and a deep forward discount shows tightness is seen as temporary. A divergence between stock markets and oil prices could also be a warning signal. Since July, global equities have taken a dive with the MSCI World stock index losing around 15 percent, while Brent has fallen by only half of that. The last time there was a similar divergence, in 2008, it heralded both a sharp fall in oil prices and a deep recession. Copper, a good indicator of real industrial demand, has also taken a sharp tumble since July, leaving oil behind. $75 PER BARREL Chris Weafer, chief strategist at Russian investment company Troika Dialog, said valuations in the Russian stock market, sensitive to oil, are already pricing a substantial fall in the price of Urals crude, which is similar to Brent. “The current equity market level reflects Urals nearer to $75 per barrel,” Weafer said. The biggest single change to oil supply over the next year is likely to be the return of Libyan oil production, which was pumping at around 1.6 million barrels per day (bpd) before the uprising in the country took hold in February. Saudi Arabia and the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries members have raised output to fill the gap left by Libya and will pump less as Libyan exports resume, OPEC Secretary General Abdullah al-Badri has said. But past experience suggests it is harder to cut output than increase it, especially when spot prices are slipping. Credit Suisse Private Banking commodities analyst Stefan Graber says even with lower oil production from the rest of OPEC, global oil demand may not be strong enough to absorb Libyan oil when it returns to the market “Moderating short-term momentum suggests that prices could extend their pullback in the days ahead,” Graber said. Ultimately, prices will reflect the pace of global oil demand growth, which has tended to be equivalent to around 90 percent of global economic growth minus 2 percentage points. Most forecasts of global GDP growth next year are between 3.5-4.0 percent, suggesting modest growth in oil consumption. But the most recent Reuters poll suggests the probability of a recession in the United States, euro zone and UK is now about one in three, dangerously close to where such predictions have been correct in the past. And if Europe can’t solve its debt and allows it to become a global financial crisis, as some bankers fear, oil could collapse. David Hufton, head of brokers PVM Oil Associates says: “If we come out of next weekend with another set of anemic announcements there is no prospect that oil prices, or any other risk assets, will hold at anything like current levels.” (Editing by James Jukwey)

Read the full article →

Do Millionaires Actually Pay Lower Taxes Than Their Secretaries?

September 20, 2011

WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama makes it sound as if there are millionaires all over America paying taxes at lower rates than their secretaries. “Middle-class families shouldn’t pay higher taxes than millionaires and billionaires,” Obama said Monday. “That’s pretty straightforward. It’s hard to argue against that.” The data tell a different story. On average, the wealthiest people in America pay a lot more taxes than the middle class or the poor, according to private and government data. They pay at a higher rate, and as a group, they contribute a much larger share of the overall taxes collected by the federal government. There may be individual millionaires who pay taxes at rates lower than middle-income workers. In 2009, 1,470 households filed tax returns with incomes above $1 million yet paid no federal income tax, according to the Internal Revenue Service. That, however, was less than 1 percent of the nearly 237,000 returns with incomes above $1 million. In his White House address Monday, Obama called on Congress to increase taxes by $1.5 trillion as part of a 10-year deficit reduction package totaling more than $3 trillion. He proposed that Congress overhaul the tax code and impose what he called the “Buffett rule,” named for billionaire investor Warren Buffett. The rule says, “People making more than $1 million a year should not pay a smaller share of their income in taxes than middle-class families pay.” “Warren Buffett’s secretary shouldn’t pay a higher tax rate than Warren Buffett. There is no justification for it,” Obama said. “It is wrong that in the United States of America, a teacher or a nurse or a construction worker who earns $50,000 should pay higher tax rates than somebody pulling in $50 million.” Buffett wrote in a recent piece for The New York Times that the tax rate he paid last year was lower than that paid by any of the other 20 people in his office. This year, households making more than $1 million will pay an average of 29.1 percent of their income in federal taxes, including income taxes and payroll taxes, according to the Tax Policy Center, a Washington think tank. Households making between $50,000 and $75,000 will pay 15 percent of their income in federal taxes. Lower-income households will pay less. For example, households making between $40,000 and $50,000 will pay an average of 12.5 percent of their income in federal taxes. Households making between $20,000 and $30,000 will pay 5.7 percent. The latest IRS figures are a few years older – and limited to federal income taxes – but show much the same thing. In 2009, taxpayers who made $1 million or more paid on average 24.4 percent of their income in federal income taxes, according to the IRS. Those making $100,000 to $125,000 paid on average 9.9 percent in federal income taxes. Those making $50,000 to $60,000 paid an average of 6.3 percent. Obama’s claim hinges on the fact that, for high-income families and individuals, investment income is often taxed at a lower rate than wages. The top tax rate for dividends and capital gains is 15 percent. The top marginal tax rate for wages is 35 percent, though that is reserved for taxable income above $379,150. With tax rates that high, why do so many people pay at lower rates? Because the tax code is riddled with more than $1 trillion in deductions, exemptions and credits, and they benefit people at every income level, according to data from the nonpartisan Joint Committee on Taxation, Congress’ official scorekeeper on revenue issues. The Tax Policy Center estimates that 46 percent of households, mostly low- and medium-income households, will pay no federal income taxes this year. Most, however, will pay other taxes, including Social Security payroll taxes. “People who are doing quite well and worry about low-income people not paying any taxes bemoan the fact that they get so many tax breaks that they are zeroed out,” said Roberton Williams, a senior fellow at the Tax Policy Center. “People at the bottom of the distribution say, but all of those rich guys are getting bigger tax breaks than we’re getting, which is also the case.” Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner was pressed at a White House briefing on the number of millionaires who pay taxes at a lower rate than middle-income families. He demurred, saying that people who make most of their money in wages pay taxes at a higher rate, while those who get most of their income from investments pay at lower rates. “So it really depends on what is your profession, where’s the source of your income, what’s the specific circumstances you face, and the averages won’t really capture that,” Geithner said.

Read the full article →

Perry-Bush Dispute Still Burns

September 19, 2011

By WILL WEISSERT, ASSOCIATED PRESS (AP) AUSTIN, Texas — Here’s the still-beating heart of the rift between Texas Gov. Rick Perry and his predecessor, George W. Bush: When Bush was governor he refused to appoint Perry’s brother-in-law to the Texas appeals court bench. With Perry now running for president, the spotlight is shining on the tense relationship between the two Texans and their allied camps. In public, both Perry and Bush shrug off any friction. “Between the Bushes and Rick Perry there is absolutely no rift at all,” Perry recently told conservative radio show host Sean Hannity. When Bush was asked in a separate interview about it, he mentioned Karl Rove, one of his most trusted advisers, and said: “Maybe with Karl. Not with my brother, with my dad, not with me at all. I admire him.” Despite all the niceties, Perry didn’t hold back when asked during a recent Republican debate about Rove’s comments that Perry’s 2010 book “Fed Up!” contained such explosive language that it could be “toxic” in the general presidential election. “Karl has been over the top for a long time in some of his remarks,” Perry said. Bush’s vice president, Dick Cheney, also has chastised Perry for branding Social Security “a Ponzi scheme.” Perry responded to that by saying, “If Vice President Cheney or anyone else says that the program that we have in place today, and young people who are paying into that expect that program to be sound and for them to receive benefits when they reach retirement age, that is just a lie.” These were just the latest tiffs in a spat that goes back to 1995. Perry was the state’s agricultural commissioner and Bush was the newly sworn-in governor. Perry lobbied for the appointment of his wife’s brother, Joseph E. Thigpen, to a vacancy on the 11th Court of Appeals in Eastland. Bush turned him down. Bill Ratliff, who was Perry’s first lieutenant governor, said Perry blames Rove for denying the request. “It created some friction between the two and Karl got blamed.” Bill Miller, a veteran Austin political consultant, confirms Ratliff’s recollection. “The staff always takes the blame,” Miller said. “Karl absolutely was the surrogate.” In a letter on commission stationary and dated Dec. 17, 1994, Perry wrote a recommendation to Clay Johnson, Gov.-elect Bush’s director of appointments. “Let me, for the sake of `truth in advertising,’ share that Joseph is my brother-in-law,” Perry said. “He is an outstanding talent who has the ability to be a distinguished jurist.” The appointment would last only the two years remaining on the vacant seat’s term, then the judge would face an election. “I obviously will campaign vigorously for him in 1996,” Perry said of Thigpen. Bush spokesman Freddy Ford did not return messages seeking comment on the matter. Mark Miner, Perry’s campaign spokesman, said the request “has no bearing on the good relationship between President Bush and Governor Perry.” “This happened years ago,” Miner said, “and people have moved on.” Thigpen, who like Perry grew up in West Texas, served as district attorney from 1977 until 1984 of a rural district that stretched north of Abilene. He also filled in as needed as a neighboring county’s attorney from 1989 to 1993, when he was fired because the county commissioners claimed he wasn’t often available when they sought his counsel. That mark on his record made Bush look for another candidate, and Jim R. Wright was appointed to the Appeals Court in April 1995. Thigpen, now 65, said he didn’t want to discuss being passed over. “I’m an old man,” he said, “and I prefer to be left that way.” Since the appointment flap, the Perry and Bush camps have drifted farther apart. This year, the establishment embodied by former President George H.W. Bush, father of George W. Bush, is pitted against the enraged tea partyers Perry wants to help him win the nomination. Many who know both former governors say it’s little wonder they never saw eye to eye. The Bush family was patrician. The Perrys were tenant cotton farmers. George W. Bush went to Yale and Harvard, famously quit drinking and rarely curses. Perry graduated from Texas A&M, enjoys fine wine and frequently peppers his speeches with “damns” and “hells.” The two men share the experience of being college cheerleaders. It’s unclear whether bad blood between the two could make it harder for Perry to attract large donors in Texas and around the country who previously backed Bush. Contacted by phone, several people who raised more than $200,000 for Bush campaigns indicated that the Perry-Bush relationship wouldn’t likely sway which candidate they ultimately support. Rove and Perry reconciled briefly in 1998, when Perry was in a dead-heat race for lieutenant governor. Rove believed an attack ad Perry was running was too negative, so he asked Perry to ditch it. In return Rove delivered the all-important endorsement of George H.W. Bush, which helped propel Perry to victory. George W. Bush was already in full national campaign mode while also keeping close tabs on Texas government to ensure it didn’t derail his plans to run for the White House. When Bush took Rove and the rest of his inner circle to Washington, Perry built his own Texas campaign team that twice helped him win the governor’s post. The feud further escalated when Rove and many other top Bush advisers went to work for U.S. Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison in her fierce battle against Perry for the 2010 gubernatorial nomination. Bush’s father even endorsed her. Despite the political firepower behind Hutchison, Perry trounced her and cruised to his second re-election. Some say Perry will want the support of the Bush family and its national political muscle over a long campaign. For now, though, Team Bush, which left the White House with record-low approval ratings, is an easy target. Austin tea party activist Don Zimmerman called Perry’s chiding Rove on national TV “a no-brainer.” “One of the weapons the Democrats will have against Governor Perry is to say, `Here comes another Bush,’” Zimmerman said. “He’s going to run away from that image as fast as he can.”

Read the full article →

Ron Ashkenas: The Art of Asking Questions

September 17, 2011

How well do you ask questions ? From my experience, most managers don’t think about this issue. After all, you don’t usually find “the ability to ask questions” on any list of managerial competencies; nor is it an explicit part of the curriculum of business schools or executive education programs. But asking questions effectively is a major underlying part of a manager’s job — which suggests that it might be worth giving this skill a little more focus. We’ve all experienced times when we’ve failed at being good questioners, perhaps without realizing it. For example, not long ago I sat in on a meeting where a project team was reviewing its progress with a senior executive sponsor. During the presentation, it was clear from his body language that the executive was uncomfortable with the direction that the team was taking. As a result, without any real questioning of the team, he deferred approval of the next steps until he could have a further discussion with the team leader. When he met with the team leader later, he ripped into him for allowing the team to go off-course. Eventually the team leader was able to explain the thinking behind the plan, convinced the executive that they would indeed achieve their objectives, and was given the go-ahead to proceed. But in the meantime the team had lost its momentum (and a week of productivity) and began to focus more on pleasing the sponsor rather than doing the project in the best way. This is not an isolated incident. Many managers don’t know how to probe the thought process of their subordinates, colleagues, and bosses — and instead make assumptions about the basis of their actions. And when those assumptions are wrong, all sorts of dysfunctional patterns can be created. In a financial services firm, for example, a major product upgrade was delayed by months because the product and IT managers had different assumptions about what was to be delivered by when, and kept blaming each other for delays. When a third party finally helped them to ask the right questions, they were able to come up with a plan that satisfied both, and quickly produced incremental revenue for the product. There are three areas where improved “questioning” can strengthen managerial effectiveness; and it might be worth considering how you can improve your skills in each one. First is the ability to ask questions about yourself . All of us fall into unproductive habits, sometimes unconsciously. Good managers, therefore, are always asking themselves and others about what they could do better or differently. Finding the right time and approach for asking these questions in a way that invites constructive and candid responses is critical. Second is the ability to ask questions about plans and projects . The examples mentioned above both fall into this category. The challenge with questioning projects is to do so in a way that not only advances the work, but that also builds relationships and helps the people involved to learn and develop. This doesn’t mean that your questions can’t be tough and direct, but the probing needs to be in the spirit of accelerating progress, illuminating unconscious assumptions and solving problems. This is in contrast to some managers who (perhaps out of their own insecurity) ask review questions either to prove that they are the smartest one in the room, or to make someone squirm. On the other hand, many of the best managers I’ve seen have an uncanny ability to engage in Socratic dialogue that helps people reach their own conclusions about what can be done to improve a plan or project, which, of course, leads to much more ownership and learning. Finally, practice asking questions about the organization . Although usually unspoken, managers have an obligation to always look for ways that the organization as a whole can function more effectively. To do this, they need to ask questions about practices, processes, and structures: Why do we do things this way? Is there a better approach? Asking these questions in a way that does not trigger defensiveness and that is seen as constructive is an important skill for managers. Most of us never think about how to frame our questions. Giving this process some explicit thought, however, might not only make you a better manager; it might also help others improve their inquiry skills, as well. Have you seen good and bad examples of how to ask questions? What’s your own self-assessment? Are you asking yourself the right questions? Cross-Posted from Harvard Business Online .

Read the full article →

Citigroup To Start Charging Customers For Not Having Enough Money

September 16, 2011

Citigroup Inc said it will start charging a monthly fee of $10 on checking and savings accounts with combined balances of less than $1,500, joining a growing list of banks seeking to recoup revenue lost under new financial industry regulations. The fee will be waived if a customer completes one direct deposit and one online bill payment per month through an account, or maintains a balance of at least $1,500 in checking and savings accounts, Citigroup said on Friday The change takes effect in December. Under Citi’s current fee structure, customers are not required to maintain minimum account balances but must complete five transactions a month through an account to avoid a monthly fee of $8. Citigroup said it will not charge for debit card use or online bill payment. Stephen Troutner, head of banking products for Citi’s U.S. consumer bank, said free debit card use could woo customers from other banks that are weighing whether to charge for debit card use, such as JPMorgan Chase & Co and Wells Fargo & Co. “Customers have told us in no uncertain terms that is a huge source of irritation,” Troutner said. New York-based Citi is the latest bank to tinker with its fee structure following changes in U.S. consumer banking regulations and laws over the last two years. New regulations — part of a broad financial sector reform effort — limit overdraft fees and other penalty fees banks can charge. In response, many banks have begun introducing monthly service fees for accounts, debit card use and visits to branches. Bank of America Corp, the largest U.S. bank by assets, added checking account fees last year. The BofA changes include an ebanking account, which allows customers to use ATMs and online banking for free but charges a monthly fee of $7 for teller visits or receiving paper statements. (Reporting by Joe Rauch in Charlotte, N.C.; editing by John Wallace) Copyright 2011 Thomson Reuters. Click for Restrictions .

Read the full article →

Southerners Less Likely To Visit The Dentist, Gallup Finds

September 16, 2011

Residents of Southern states are less likely to visit the dentist, indicating that their household income may be lower, according to a Gallup poll released Thursday. Slightly more than 50 percent of people living in Louisiana and Mississippi got their teeth cleaned in the last 12 months, according to the Gallup study. Massachusetts and Connecticut led the states in dental visits with about 75 percent of residents in both states reporting that they visited the dentist in the last 12 months. The ranks of the American uninsured swelled to nearly 50 million in 2010, according to Census data released earlier this week , which could mean continued bad news for Americans’ dental hygiene, the Gallup poll found. More than 70 percent of residents of the top 10 states for dental visits have health insurance compared to an average insurance rate of 56 percent for the bottom 10 states. Lacking health insurance can often be an indicator of poverty, the Gallup report said. And many Americans aren’t willing to shell out for dental insurance even in good economic times. At least 100 million Americans lacked dental insurance before the recession, according to The Washington Post . Some dentists are finding creative ways to make sure the poor and uninsured have clean teeth. The Georgia Dental Association hosted a free clinic at a church in Woodstock, Georgia last month, according to The Atlanta Journal-Constitution . Four thousand people showed up and many slept outside to get free dental care, the paper reported. Nearly 60 percent of Georgia residents saw a dentist in the last year, putting the state in the “lower range” of the country for dental visits, according to Gallup. Free dental care also drew thousands to an outdoor health clinic in an Appalachian region of Virginia last summer, according to The Washington Post . Even with the country marred in an unemployment crisis, many are flocking back to the dentist, not because they’re in any better position to afford it, but because their teeth hurt too much, according The St. Petersburg Times . The result: Patients paying more for dental care because dentists have to perform more complex procedures after years of neglect. Here’s a list of the bottom 10 states for dental visits in the last year, according to Gallup: Mississippi: 51.9 percent of residents Louisiana: 54.8 percent of residents West Virginia: 55.4 percent of residents Texas: 56.1 percent of residents Alabama: 56.3 percent of residents Kentucky: 56.3 percent of residents Arkansas: 56.6 percent of residents Oklahoma: 56.8 percent of residents Tennessee: 57.9 percent of residents Missouri: 56.8 percent of residents

Read the full article →

Rep. Steny Hoyer: Speeding Up the Patent Process

September 16, 2011

The patent that led to the telephone was approved in one month. The patent that led to the cell phone, as former White House economic advisor Austan Goolsbee recently observed, was approved in three years. Today, patents are held up for even longer — and jobs and growth are held up with them. At this moment, more than 700,000 patents are caught in the backlog. Could one of those 700,000 new ideas be the next iPhone, the next breakthrough drug, the key to the next great American industry? We’ll have to wait a long time to find out. With millions of Americans still out of work, Democrats are working to advance a plan to rebuild American industry and create the solid, middle-class jobs our country needs. We call it the Make It In America plan: it’s a legislative program to help American businesses stay here, grow here, build more products here, and sell them to the world. And a crucial part of that effort is ensuring we are the world’s leader in innovation, so that we can outpace our competitors and stay at the job-creating forefront of the world economy. America is still the world’s most innovative country — but it’s a sobering fact that Japan has recently overtaken us in patent applications. China, too, is on pace to overtake us soon. If we want to regain our innovation edge, we have to make it easier for American inventors to patent new products here and manufacture them here. That’s why it’s so important that President Obama will today sign into law the America Invents Act, the most significant patent reform in half a century. It’s also the first Make It In America bill to become law this year. If we want to put more Americans back to work, it can’t be the last. The America Invents Act creates a markedly more efficient patent system. It significantly reduces the backlog of ideas by hiring more patent examiners, modernizing technology in the Patent and Trademark Office, and speeding up the review process. It also institutes a new, “first-to-file” system for resolving disputes over priority. Such disputes have often been bogged down in costly, time-consuming legal cases. But this new legislation cuts down on that litigation by asking a simple question: who filed for a patent first? While the old system was weighted in favor of the largest corporations with the biggest legal teams and the most money to burn, the new system levels the playing field for small businesses and individual inventors, the kind of people who gave us revolutionary ideas like the personal computer. Speeding up the patent process will get American ideas to market faster, and that unlocks tremendous opportunities for our economy to grow. But a wealth of other innovation-promoting ideas are also part of Democrats’ Make It In America plan, and Congress should build on this success by passing more of the plan into law. We should expand and make permanent the research and development tax credit, so that companies have stronger incentives to invest in new technologies here at home. We should promote high-tech, advanced manufacturing by passing the JOBS Act, which builds job-training partnerships between colleges and advanced manufacturing businesses. These partnerships will help more Americans find job opportunities in fast-growing fields — and help American businesses satisfy their demand for workers without looking overseas. We should create a more efficient corporate tax code, with lower rates and fewer loopholes. That would help businesses make decisions based on their best economic judgment, not based on maximizing their tax deductions. And we should keep pace with international competitors by creating a National Infrastructure Development Bank. It would leverage private investment in much-needed projects from energy delivery systems to broadband networks to modern ports, projects that would create jobs in the short term while laying the foundation for long-term growth. There’s no doubt that America still has the qualities that made its economy the strongest in the world — the work ethic, the competitive drive, and the innovative spirit that have made this country great. I believe in the Make It In America plan because it’s the best way of putting those qualities to work, so that we can out-build, out-educate, and out-innovate our competitors. Today’s far-reaching patent reform is a big step in the right direction. And I can’t wait to see the American innovations that come to market faster as a result.

Read the full article →

Unemployment Surpasses ‘The Economy’ As Country’s Biggest Concern: Gallup

September 15, 2011

It’s the unemployment, stupid, according to a Gallup poll released Thursday. Almost 40 percent of Americans said in September that unemployment or joblessness is the biggest issue facing the country, up from 29 percent in August, a Gallup Poll released Thursday shows. Americans now cite unemployment more than “the economy” as the nation’s most important problem, the report said. Not since last November has unemployment surpassed the economy as the top concern of Americans. U.S. employers added no new jobs in August as the unemployment rate held at 9.1 percent, the Labor Department reported earlier this month. And things aren’t poised to pick up any time soon, Douglas Elmendorf, director of the Congressional Budget Office told a congressional committee earlier this week . Elmendorf said his non-partisan agency predicts the unemployment rate will hover at 9 percent through the end of next year. Though the unemployment rate has been high for months, politicians may finally be coming to the realization that it’s a top concern for voters, especially President Barack Obama, who submitted his American Jobs Act to Congress earlier this week. The bills aims to use a combination of spending and tax cuts to spur job growth. President Obama’s re-election hopes might hinge on how quickly he can get the nation back to work. Ronald Reagan is the only president since World War II to win re-election with an unemployment rate above 6 percent, according to Bloomberg . The jobless rate stood at 7.2 percent on Election Day in 1984. For their part, some prominent economists in the Obama camp seem to agree with the American public that creating jobs is the key to turning the economy around. Larry Summers, the former director of the White House National Economic Council, wrote in an op-ed in the Financial Times in June that boosting spending, borrowing and lending would help to turn the economy around by increasing demand and creating jobs. While some other economists are doubting the effectiveness of Obama’s plan, many small business owners say that if passed, the proposal would encourage them to hire . Still, the Gallup poll found that the plan may not be enough to convince Americans that Obama can handle the issue most important to them. More respondents said Republicans are better suited to handle the nation’s biggest problem than said Democrats could deal with the issue effectively.

Read the full article →

SEC Admits Some Docs From Preliminary Investigations Likely Tossed

September 14, 2011

WASHINGTON — The Securities and Exchange Commission has acknowledged that some documents from preliminary investigations of major banks and convicted swindler Bernard Madoff likely were destroyed under a former agency policy. The SEC’s enforcement chief made the disclosure in a letter Wednesday to Sen. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa. Grassley had asked about allegations by an SEC attorney that the agency illegally destroyed records related to thousands of preliminary probes, including investigations of Bank of America, Goldman Sachs, Wells Fargo and Madoff. Enforcement Director Robert Khuzami said the agency doesn’t believe any current or future investigations were harmed by the policy, which allowed documents to be discarded in cases that were closed when staffers decided a formal probe wasn’t warranted. A review by the SEC inspector general is under way to determine if any law was violated. Khuzami said in the letter that the SEC has kept “significant information” related to all the “matters under inquiry,” even under the former policy on records. “We believe the electronic … information that we retain allows staff to `connect the dots’ between current and closed matters,” Khuzami wrote to Grassley. The electronic information is searchable and allows SEC enforcement staff to identify potential relationships between individuals or entities, and between current and past inquiries, he said. The information that was in documents that were discarded still may be available from sources inside or outside the SEC, Khuzami said. The agency’s current policy, adopted last year, requires all documents to be retained whether they are part of a preliminary probe that is closed or a formal investigation, Khuzami said. The current policy and practices meet the SEC’s legal obligations, he said. The agency’s reputation has been battered by its failure to detect the massive Madoff fraud over nearly two decades and by other lapses. Grassley, a longtime critic of the SEC, has expressed concern that the records destruction may have hurt the agency’s ability to pursue cases.

Read the full article →

Top advertising chief sees calm amid economic storm

September 14, 2011

By Paul Thomasch NEW YORK (Reuters) – The stubbornly bad jobs and housing markets in the United States coupled with Europe’s debt crisis have created fear that the advertising market could be headed for a major pullback next year. But Universal McCann Chief Executive Jacki Kelley is not easily scared. In an exclusive interview with Reuters, she said that advertising budgets can withstand mounting economic worries and are not destined to experience the deep, nerve-rattling cuts that marked the 2007-09 recession. Her view has been fortified by the fact that thus far corporations are remaining calm, betting that the best way to jump-start sales is to keep their brands in front of consumers with TV commercials, billboards and digital campaigns. That’s a reversal from the impulse to abandon marketing plans that characterized the last recession. “Advertisers are a bit more cautious, but they are not panicking and they are certainly not pulling dollars out of the marketplace,” Kelley said. Kelly, who serves as the global head of an advertising agency that counts Exxon Mobil, General Motors, Sony and Microsoft among its clients, said she is seeing a cautiously optimistic outlook across industries. Universal McCann, the division of Interpublic Group , commonly known as UM, is based in New York but buys and plans global marketing campaigns from offices in 130 countries around the world. Advertising finally stabilized over the last 18 months after draconian budget cuts starting in late 2007 and culminating in 2009, when U.S. ad spending dropped by 16 percent to $163 billion. Now, however, there are worries that the ad market could be headed for another major pullback in 2012, thanks to mounting macro-economic woes. But Kelly said those concerns are overblown, pointing to a forecast from sister agency Magna calling for U.S. ad spending to rise 4.8 percent next year. “Many advertisers will self-diagnose and say they overreacted last time,” she said. “They are working hard to ensure they don’t do so this time.” Kelley joined UM after stints at Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia, Yahoo Inc and USA Today, three companies that depend on ad sales and suffered badly during the 2009 budget cuts. She was promoted to CEO of UM in January. SPEND INTO IT Advertising is often a leading indicator of an economic downturn and a lagging indicator of an economic recovery. Those that can withstand the pressure and “spend into it, end up coming out of it stronger,” Kelly said. “Intuitively, advertisers know that, though it can sometimes be hard for them to convince their organizations.” And it will only get harder, Kelley said, if consumer confidence continues to erode and automakers, telecoms or retailers see a significant drop in sales. Absent that, however, she advises companies to stay as flexible as possible with their spending. “If you’re unsure of the volatility of your spend, you really need to stick with mediums that allow you get in and out with a little more immediacy,” she said. That could mean more money flowing into media such as television, where commercials can be bought on a very short-term basis, or Internet search. Conversely, magazines, already-hurting, are likely to suffer more. “When you get into these type of climates, the media that tend to be the most vulnerable — which isn’t because of their audience — are the ones that require a longer lead time,” she said. “If you are a monthly print publication, commitments happen three to four months out and you can’t pull that.” For her part, Kelly is shaking things up at UM, moving the agency away from traditional client compensation agreements that typically pay agencies based on how many staffers worked on an account or how long they worked on the campaign. Instead, UM has instituted pay-for-performance client compensation deals, meaning that the agency has a financial stake in planning a successful campaign. As a result, UM has invested heavily in data and analytics, and has contracts structured that pay it based on a host of different metrics, including sales, share price, brand preference and even Facebook “likes.” “We believe strongly that agencies should be compensated on the performance they deliver,” said Kelley. “In any climate that’s critical, and more so in this one.” (Reporting by Paul Thomasch; Editing by Peter Lauria and Steve Orlofsky)

Read the full article →

BofA Used `Illegal Retaliatory Tactics’ Against Worker, Labor Department Says

September 14, 2011

The Department of Labor has ordered Bank of America to reinstate a Los Angeles area-based employee that was fired after allegedly conducting an internal investigation revealing “widespread and pervasive” fraud at Countrywide Financial, a home lender that merged with the bank in 2008. The employee is to be paid $930,000 in back wages, interest, compensatory damages and attorney fees, according to a Labor Department press release published Wednesday. See the Department of Labor’s full announcement below: SAN FRANCISCO – The U.S. Department of Labor’s Occupational Safety and Health Administration has found Charlotte, N.C.-based Bank of America Corp. in violation of the whistleblower protection provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act for improperly firing an employee. The bank has been ordered to reinstate and pay the employee approximately $930,000, which includes back wages, interest, compensatory damages and attorney fees. The findings follow an investigation by OSHA’s San Francisco Regional Office, which was initiated after receiving a complaint from the Los Angeles-area employee. “It’s clear from our investigation that Bank of America used illegal retaliatory tactics against this employee,” said OSHA Assistant Secretary Dr. David Michaels. “This employee showed great courage reporting potential fraud and standing up for the rights of other employees to do the same.” The employee originally worked for Countrywide Financial Corp., which merged with Bank of America in July 2008. The employee led internal investigations that revealed widespread and pervasive wire, mail and bank fraud involving Countrywide employees. The employee alleged that those who attempted to report fraud to Countrywide’s Employee Relations Department suffered persistent retaliation. The employee was fired shortly after the merger. “Whistleblowers play a vital role in ensuring the integrity of our financial system, as well as the safety of our food, air, water, workplaces and transportation systems,” added Michaels. “This case highlights the importance of defending employees against retaliation when they try to protect the public from the consequences of an employer’s illegal activities.” Both the complainant and Bank of America can appeal the monetary damages to the Labor Department’s Office of Administrative Law Judges within 30 days of receiving the findings. OSHA enforces the whistleblower provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and 20 other statutes protecting employees who report violations of various airline, commercial motor carrier, consumer product, environmental, financial reform, food safety, health care reform, nuclear, pipeline, public transportation agency, railroad and maritime laws. Under these laws enacted by Congress, employers are prohibited from retaliating against employees who raise various protected concerns or provide protected information to the employer or to the government. Employees who believe that they have been retaliated against for engaging in protected conduct may file a complaint with the secretary of labor to request an investigation by OSHA’s Whistleblower Protection Program. Detailed information on employee whistleblower rights, including fact sheets, is available at http://www.whistleblowers.gov. Under the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970, employers are responsible for providing safe and healthful workplaces for their employees. OSHA’s role is to ensure these conditions for America’s working men and women by setting and enforcing standards, and providing training, education and assistance. For more information, visit http://www.osha.gov.

Read the full article →

How Banks Cause World Hunger [GRAPHIC]

September 14, 2011

Banks are among some of the most hated companies in America , largely for their role in causing a global financial crisis. That reputation could only get worse thanks to one of their more controversial practices: Food Speculation. Banks and other financial speculators are increasingly “betting on food prices in financial markets,” according to this infographic from the World Development Movement . Food prices now account for 70 percent of total expenses in some of the world’s poorer households, hitting a record high in February . Looking forward, the OECD estimates that over the next decade cereal prices will rise 20 percent. That’s still less than meet prices, which are expected to jump by nearly a third . Here is the infographic from the World Development Movement :

Read the full article →

Euro Officials Warning ‘Systemic’ Crisis Risks New Credit Crunch

September 14, 2011

(John O’Donnell) – The EU’s top finance officials are urging ministers to reinforce banks’ capital while warning that a “systemic” crisis in sovereign debt is hurting banks and risks a new credit crunch, according to EU documents. In a series of bluntly worded reports prepared by officials for a meeting of finance ministers this week, they highlight a “risk of a vicious circle between sovereign debt, bank funding and negative growth” spurring a fresh freeze in lending. “While tensions in sovereign debt markets have intensified and bank funding risks have increased over the summer, contagion has spread across markets and countries and the crisis has become systemic,” officials write in the documents obtained by Reuters. The reports, which raise concerns in unusually emphatic language and make pointed criticism of some countries for failing to help weak banks, highlight a sense of alarm in European capitals about the financial crisis. They also show a growing sense of exacerbation at the failure of Spain, Germany and others to deal with flagging banks even after their weaknesses were exposed by recent stress tests. In the documents, the influential Economic and Financial Committee, which prepares the agenda for discussion among ministers, urges action to bolster the balance sheets of weak banks, especially those with loans in stressed countries. They level harsh criticism at countries including Spain for not doing enough to reinforce its banks following dismal results in stress tests. At stake, they write, is the threat of another credit crunch. One of the reports, dated Sept. 13, cautions that the “spill-over effects” could feed “a dangerous negative loop between the financial and the real sectors (of the economy), whereby funding problems and … risk aversion … may lead to … deleveraging by banks, thereby generating a credit crunch, in some Member States”. Outlining a sovereign debt crisis which they say has “entered a new phase”, officials highlight the difficulties experienced by European banks in borrowing. “Despite the considerable strengthening of capital positions … European banks have recently experienced market funding difficulties resulting … from stress on wholesale liquidity markets, high spreads in secondary markets, and, for some EU banks, growing difficulties in accessing funding from U.S. counterparties.” To counter dwindling confidence in the region’s banks, officials recommend to ministers that “a further reinforcement of bank resources is advisable”. “This is important for banks that have failed the stress test, but also for those that have passed the test but with capital levels close to the relevant threshold,” the report said. They criticise some countries for not taking such measures, which would include state-backed capital injections in flagging lenders, after the recent stress tests. “Albeit having five institutions falling below the … threshold in (stress tests) … the Bank of Spain announced that no Spanish bank needs to further increase its capital,” the report said. Copyright 2011 Thomson Reuters. Click for Restrictions .

Read the full article →

13 Devastating Numbers About Poverty In America

September 14, 2011

It’s far from a secret that the U.S. economy is in trouble. A new report by the U.S. Census Bureau just puts numbers on what so many Americans already know. Across the country last year, the state of poverty, income and health insurance worsened. Indeed, 15.1 percent of Americans lived in poverty in 2010, the highest percentage since 1993, according to the U.S. Census Bureau’s Tuesday report on poverty . In total numbers, 2.6 million more people fell into poverty last year, bringing the total to 46.2 million nationwide. For a family of four, poverty is defined as living with an income of $22,314 or less. An increasingly stratified economy has taken its toll on income as well. The same report finds that inflation-adjusted wages for the median male worker are at lows not seen since 1968, as businesses begin to tailor product lines to account for a country with more rich and poor, and fewer middle-class. Health insurance benefits has also taken a hit. Many employers are beginning to suspend worker health insurance benefits or instead rely on part-time workers to cut costs. The Census Bureau reports that 1.5 million fewer Americans were covered by employee-sponsored health plans in 2010. Furthermore, the number of Americans with no insurance at all now sits around 50 million. Dire, indeed. Here are 13 devastating numbers from the U.S. Census Bureau’s report, compiled by the Economic Policy Institute :

Read the full article →

Gary Shapiro: We Can Handle the Truth: Our Government Is a Jobs Killer

September 13, 2011

There was a moment in President Obama’s speech to a joint session of Congress Thursday night when Candidate Obama returned to the limelight. Unfortunately, it was short-lived. Behind all the passion and eloquence that Obama was able to muster for one of the biggest speeches of his presidency, there was the same old stuff. And Americans should expect the same old results. While it’s not quite accurate to say that Obama double-downed on the failed economic policies of his administration — his $447 billion jobs proposal is half the 2009 stimulus — there was absolutely nothing to suggest that Obama is prepared to change course. All the lofty rhetoric couldn’t mask the president’s continued commitment to Keynesian economics and willful ignorance of the needs of job creators. The truth requires listening to those who create jobs. I represent more than 2,000 tech companies in my day job, but I also hear from lots of entrepreneurs and other business leaders. Since the early 2011 launch of my book, The Comeback: How Innovation will Restore the American Dream , I have traversed the country speaking to varied groups and after each talk I am surrounded by job creators with similar stories. The furniture maker in upstate New York; the couple with a landscape company, nursery and day care center in Michigan; the Virginia tech start up; the Oregon inventor and the Florida restaurant owner: they all are patriotic Americans who want to grow their businesses and help the economy. But none of them are hiring. Why? For very good reasons, many related to the tough economic environment but many — startlingly 0 — related to policies of our government. I ask why no one, especially those in power, raises these subjects. More often than not, the answer is some version of the famous retort by Col. Nathan Jessep in the movie A Few Good Men : Because Americans “can’t handle the truth.” Well, I think Americans can handle the truth, and I offer these unconventional views in the spirit that a healthy economy and jobs are vital to our future. Our anti-discrimination laws hurt new jobs creation . Our nation has tens of thousands of underemployed lawyers eager to take on the cause of any fired worker. Anti-discrimination lawsuits and EEOC complaints are easy to file, costly and time-consuming to defend. Combine this with our inability to take responsibility for our own failures and we have a litigation cocktail which discourages hiring. Of course discrimination against individuals based on suspect classification is terrible, but the laws aren’t helpful in encouraging new hires. We are not yet Europe, which makes every dismissal costly, but we can take advice from Laurence Parisot, the head of France’s largest employers’ union, Movement of the French Enterprises, who said , “We will hire more people if it’s made easier to fire them.” Two-year unemployment compensation discourages jobs . According to an analysis by the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco , the Obama Administration’s extension of unemployment benefits to 99 weeks increased the U.S. jobless rate as much as 0.8 percentage points. Or put another way, serious job seeking occurs when benefits are about to run out. As an employer, I have twice experienced job candidates asking to delay their start date until after unemployment payments end. I am not alone. In a recent article, The Wall Street Journal recently quoted an Alabama farmer looking to hire who was encountering “Americans who showed up to apply for jobs demanded that he pay them off the books so that they can continue to collect unemployment benefits.” As I’ve argued before , one way to end this fraud is to tie long-term unemployment benefits to volunteer work. The 2010 stimulus package did not boost the economy. The $787 billion stimulus package was divided into roughly three parts : a third to the states so they could avoid tough financial choices; a third to taxpayers in the form of barely noticeable reduction in taxes and a third for pork barrel projects, the so-called “shovel ready” boondoggles that replaced real infrastructure investment. What do we have to show for all this? An unemployment rate above 9 percent and anemic 2011 GDP growth . If the money had at least been invested in real capital infrastructure we would be better off. The same is true with the so-called “cash-for-clunkers” program, first-time homebuyers and other feel-good programs. Each one borrowed from our children so we can feel better today. Shameful! Our political leadership’s business antipathy and uncertainty on taxes, health care and spending discourage jobs creation. People running and owning businesses face political uncertainty in so many areas. They have no idea of how much and what type of taxes they will have to pay over the next few years. They face a new, far-reaching health care law that imposes new costs and may or may not be repealed by a new Congress or the Supreme Court. They fear a president who has no business background, few advisers with business experience, and who encourages an anti-business climate, higher taxes on wealth creators and class warfare. And they have the National Labor Relations Board telling companies in which states they can manufacture and seeking to make secret overnight unionization the status quo. High corporate taxes and pro-union protectionism discourages jobs creation. At 35 percent, the U.S. has one of the highest corporate tax rate in the developed world , which forces businesses to invest abroad. The United States also has not passed a free trade agreement in six years. Although the president talks a good game on free trade, he and his Democratic allies keep adding new conditions to the Panama, Colombia and South Korea free trade agreements that have been stalled for years. This means our job-creating exporters pay more than our competitors. Can Americans handle this truth? I think they can, but it will require leadership and responsibility from our elected leaders to do something about it. We need to stop with the little ideas, like lowering the tax withholding and even good ideas like Patent Reform, and go to the real issues — even if they are uncomfortable. Challenge Americans to accept responsibility, sacrifice for their children and contribute to society. The status quo is leading us down the path of decline. Gary Shapiro is president and CEO of the Consumer Electronics Association (CEA), the U.S. trade association representing more than 2,000 consumer electronics companies, and author of the New York Times bestselling book, “The Comeback: How Innovation Will Restore the American Dream.”

Read the full article →

Dan Silverstein: Private Sector Approach at U.S. Aid Agency: Can Tough Measures Aid U.S. Jobs?

September 13, 2011

In the stock market the smart money knows “if you’re going to panic, panic early”. The same is true for entrepreneurs when it comes to recognizing an idea that isn’t working: Try to fail fast. Nothing is worse than throwing good money after bad. If only the federal bureaucracy could learn that lesson every Tea Party enthusiast would stand up and salute. If only . . . Too many development programs over the past 50 years have failed slowly, or, having failed, were kept alive for political expediency. The effect has been to create a perception among Americans that too much foreign aid is wasteful. Some see it as being squandered on dictators who hate the United States to begin with, while others are convinced that the people for whom the aid is intended are too primitive to know what to do with it. Another widely held belief is that once politicians get their hands on aid money it goes wherever it does the most good for the least number of people, and that the spigot – once turned on — can never be turned off. Whatever may have been the case in the past, change is coming to the bureaucracy. Most recently, the Office of Innovation and Development Alliances (IDEA) was created within the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) , the primary agency that distributes aid to countries in need. IDEA is part think tank, part venture capital fund, part humanitarian agency, part bureaucracy, and all business. It’s director, Maura O’Reilly , likes to shake things up with creative energy not usually associated with the hidebound traditionalists at USAID. IDEA’s concept documents come off like a private sector memo from the head of worldwide operations. They’re aggressive. They instill an expectation of excellence. They reserve the right to remain flexible and to make decisions on the fly as circumstances dictate in order to exploit opportunities, but not to protect to sacred cows. Of course, as a wholly owned subsidiary of the State Department USAID can never fully separate itself from the influence of diplomacy on development decisions. But, politics is becoming more of a sideshow to the real action with cost efficiency now the mantra of Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and USAID Administrator Rajiv Shah . As Clinton’s highest profile and most widely respected aid executive, Shah caught the attention of the professional development community last year when he challenged them to “hold our feet to the fire” in evaluating his agency’s efficiency. He brought in O’Reilly to build an organization that would stimulate idea flow while keeping a tight rein on costs. The vehicle through which much of this activity is being funneled is Development Innovation Ventures . DIV’s staff talks in ways unfamiliar to most bureaucrats. “Transformative innovation” is a word dripping with sex appeal at DIV; “repeatable disruptive innovation” and “scalable” roll off the tongues of the cool people gathering around the water cooler. At DIV there are to be no sacred cows. Projects are administered through three stages of growth and at each stage are subject to rigorous evaluation. If they can’t match expectations for efficacy, or for producing public support among the people for whom they are intended, or if they can’t be scaled up to a level at which the impact can be measured in orders of magnitude, they get cut, according to O’Reilly. Not everyone is a fan, however. Illinois Congressman Donald Manzullo (R, 16th) tried to get IDEA’S entire $30 million budget eliminated. He says that a lot of what is being funded through DIV is duplicative and unnecessary. According to his research the Defense Department, the Energy Department, the National Institutes of Health, and the private sector are conducting similar projects. Here’s a solution: Sponsor a competition. Invite a prestigious panel of American entrepreneurs and NGO executives to review the work of every agency and for-profit entity that seems to be doing the same thing as DIV. Whoever wins the highest praise gets some fraction of the total duplicative funding allocation; everyone else goes home empty handed and looks for funding elsewhere. This is such a good idea that it should be emulated throughout the federal government so only the most productive, cost efficient government agencies get funded for each project. Certainly, if subject matter experts in each field are the final arbiters of who does the work best there should be a high degree of confidence in their conclusions. As taxpayers with skin in the game they can be relied upon to choose those who will shepherd the peoples’ money with greatest efficiency. Not only will this civilian review process avoid the temptation of one party to punish another at the expense of the country, but it will avoid the turf wars that rage all the time among government agencies. Advocates of reduced government spending will then be left to debate if muscle should be cut from a lean beast rather than arguing over how much fat to trim. Cutting out funding to DIV altogether, however, seems an intemperate reaction to the possibility of duplication, particularly when DIV is clearly breaking new ground in managing how foreign aid is allocated. It deserves support, not derision. Cutting off all funding smacks of the partisan reprisal that prompts so much disgust for how public policy is created these days. Foreign aid distributed according to the DIV business model increases the likelihood of it becoming the “investment” that underlies the logic of offering it. We know that the American economy predominately is based on consumer spending and that at the moment it has stagnated with less than two percent estimated growth. Sub-Saharan Africa, on the other hand, is growing at least twice as fast. If we can elevate even a fraction of that population to a point at which it has disposable income we are creating new markets for domestic businesses. Who wouldn’t want to make that investment of time and capital on behalf of the American people and American jobs? Yet, criticism of all manner of foreign development aid has reached a decibel level among latter day isolationists in this country that is reminiscent of the America First Committee of the 1930s whose opposition to American intervention into European political affairs kept us from exerting our influence until 1941 when we were forced to rely on military interventions in both Europe and the Far East. This time the battlefield is likely to be conference rooms where a more sophisticated marketing presentation by Middle Eastern and Asian business interests will secure market share throughout the developing world at the expense of jobs in the US. This time it is an economic war that we must address. We dare not be caught unengaged again. * I have an association with USAID.

Read the full article →

How Focusing on Green Jobs Could Boost Employment

September 12, 2011

Huffington Post… See the article here: How Focusing on Green Jobs Could Boost Employment Find our Weekly Commercial Real Estate, Private Equity and Fund Newsletters at www.WeeklyBrief.net

Read the full article →

Goldman To Suffer More Than Other Banks, Analysts Say

September 12, 2011

Analysts have been slashing earnings estimates for big Wall Street banks recently, particularly for Goldman Sachs, as unpredictable trading markets and weak merger and underwriting volumes hurt the sector’s profit potential. Third quarter average profit estimates for Goldman Sachs Group Inc have fallen 18 percent over the last month to $2.28 per share, according to Thomson Reuters I/B/E/S. Average estimates for Bank of America Corp have fallen 8 percent, and average forecasts for JPMorgan Chase & Co have fallen 4 percent. Goldman has fallen particularly hard because it has a greater dependence on traditional investment banking businesses like buying and selling securities, underwriting stock and bond offerings, and advising on mergers. The largest U.S. investment bank has derived 45 percent of its revenue from the once-lucrative business of fixed income, currency and commodities trading, on average, since the start of 2006. JPMorgan, in contrast, derived just 12 percent of its revenue from bond trading. Trading was particularly difficult in the third quarter because even though clients traded more in a volatile market, much of the activity came from low-margin products, like Treasury bonds and equities. Analysts also warn that some banks may have to take steep write-downs on inventories of stocks and bonds whose values declined. On Sunday, Citigroup analyst Keith Horowitz cut his third-quarter earnings estimate for Goldman to just 10 cents, down from a previous estimate of $2.70, although 36 cents of that came from one-time items. Horowitz cut his Goldman outlook as part of his broader reduction in price targets for major banks. Horowitz’s move follows Oppenheimer & Co analyst Chris Kotowski changing his recommendation on Goldman shares to “perform” from “outperform” on Tuesday. Both he and Nomura analyst Glenn Schorr also cut Goldman estimates dramatically. Full-year average estimates for Goldman Sachs have dropped 8 percent and 3 percent for 2011 and 2012, respectively, according to Thomson Reuters I/B/E/S. “Brokers like Goldman, I just want to stay away from them right now because I feel like they are so tied to the market,” said Todd Kaplan, a value-stock investor at Rand Strategic Partners in Westborough, Massachusetts, who manages about $10 million in assets and owns Bank of America but not Goldman. LESS ROOM TO RUN Even outside of trading, Goldman could turn in a disappointing quarter. Goldman’s investing and lending business may also get hit hard because of declines in the value of the stocks and bonds that Goldman owns. Its holdings in Industrial And Commercial Bank of China Ltd have declined more than 15 percent so far this quarter, which could result in a $475 million write-down, according to Citi’s Horowitz. Nomura’s Schorr anticipates a $700 million negative revenue from the overall investing and lending division. Analysts also lowered assumptions for its investment banking revenue because companies have been hesitant to pull the trigger on IPOs, debt offerings and M&A transactions due to high volatility and weak pricing. Most analysts have remained generally bullish on Goldman despite what may soon be the sixth straight quarter of weaker profit and revenue. Of the 28 analysts who cover the stock, 18 recommend buying more, while 6 suggest clients hold onto positions without adding and only two recommend selling. But even fans of the stock have gotten more cautious about how much it might rise. The median price target for Goldman is $155, down from $170 a month ago and $198 three months ago. New targets still represent a big premium to Goldman’s recent market value. Its stock is down 39 percent this year, setting a new 52-week low of $99.80 on Monday. It has traded at a discount to tangible book value since August, reflecting investors’ belief that, without more trading activity, the cost of capital for Goldman’s huge trading business may cut deeply into earnings. That said, shares of Morgan Stanley, Bank of America and Citigroup have posted sharper declines than Goldman Sachs so far this year. That is why some stock analysts are less enthusiastic about Goldman Sachs. They believe stocks that have fallen further may have more potential upside. “If a client called us up to ask if he/she should buy the stock we would suggest at least seven other names that we would suggest buying first,” said Oppenheimer’s Kotowski. (Reporting by Lauren Tara LaCapra; Editing by Tim Dobbyn) Copyright 2011 Thomson Reuters. Click for Restrictions .

Read the full article →

Economists Scaling Back Growth Forecasts Through Next Year: Survey

September 12, 2011

WASHINGTON — Confronted with an economy that has decidedly underperformed this year, economists are scaling back their growth forecasts for 2011 and next year. In their latest forecast, top economists with the National Association for Business Economics predict that the economy will grow 1.7 percent this year – down from the group’s May prediction of 2.8 percent expansion. For 2012, the group is forecasting growth of 2.3 percent, compared to a May forecast of 3.2 percent growth. The new survey, released Monday, is in line with the outlook of other economists who have marked down growth prospects to reflect an economy that has struggled this year to deal with a spike in gasoline prices, production disruptions stemming from Japan’s earthquake, a flare-up of Europe’s debt problems and a prolonged debate over America’s debt ceiling. “A wide variety of factors were seen as restraining growth, including low consumer and business confidence,” said Gene Huang, the president-elect of NABE and one of 52 professional forecasters who participated in the survey. “Panelists are very concerned about high unemployment, federal deficits and the European sovereign debt crisis,” said Huang, who is chief economist at FedEx Corp. The survey was done before President Barack Obama appeared before Congress on Thursday to unveil a new $447 billion plan to jump-start job growth through a combination of tax cuts and government spending. The latest NABE outlook underscores the problems facing an economy that many economists fear could be in danger of slipping into another recession. The expectations for overall economic growth, as measured by the gross domestic product, for both 2011 and 2012 were trimmed by a percentage point from the May forecast. The May estimates had been trimmed from February when the NABE analysts were forecasting growth of 3.3 percent this year. The economy grew 3 percent in 2010, the first full year after the country emerged from the 2007-2009 recession, but slowed to an annual rate of just 0.7 percent in the first six months of this year. Because of the slow growth, the NABE forecasters don’t expect much improvement in the unemployment rate, which in August was stuck at 9.1 percent, a month when the economy didn’t create any net new jobs. For all of 2011, the economists are forecasting the unemployment rate will average 9 percent and will improve only slightly to 8.7 percent in 2012. In May, the NABE panel had projected unemployment would average 8.7 percent this year and 8.2 percent next year. Job growth was projected to average 124,000 per month this year, instead of the 190,000 average monthly job gains the economists had forecast in May. Next year’s average job growth was put at 162,000, instead of the 202,000 job gains forecast in May. The economy needs to add at least 250,000 jobs a month to rapidly bring down the unemployment rate. The rate has been above 9 percent in all but two months since May 2009. The NABE panel forecast that builders would start work on 590,000 new homes this year, no improvement from last year’s weak pace, while sales of new cars was put at 12.6 million units, up a modest 8.6 percent from the 11.6 million new vehicles sold in 2010. The economists did see a little better outlook for oil prices, which they projected would average $90 per barrel in December, down from a forecast of $105 per barrel in May. Oil was trading Friday around $87 per barrel. The new NABE forecast was prepared for the group’s annual conference, being held this year in Dallas

Read the full article →

Companies With The Most Valuable Brands

September 10, 2011

At the same time the U.S. economy teeters on the edge of recession, public perception of even the most well-known brands is deteriorating. The combined value of the world’s 100 most valuable brands has already fallen by 2.4 percent since January, according to a yearly list made by Brand-Finance plc , a brand valuation consulting firm. Among all brands, it’s the banks that experienced particularly hard hits, especially Bank of America and Wells Fargo, the report finds. Not so for tech companies. Those brands remain strong, and none more than Apple and Google. An August poll by Gallup found that Americans better regard the computer industry than any other sector of the economy. Apple had a particularly strong year, leapfrogging Microsoft in brand value and putting itself within striking distance of Google, whose brand currently has the highest value of any company. And while Google continues to enjoy its status as the U.S. company with the best reputation — that also according to a survey last May by Harris Interactive — Apple is doing just fine for themselves. In August, the company that brought the iPhone to the world became the most valuable U.S. company by market cap. Here are the 10 global companies with the most valuable brands, according to Brand-Finance Global 100:

Read the full article →

Rep. Dennis Kucinich: International Policy: Its Relationship to the Domestic Economy

September 9, 2011

Tonight I wish to speak to this Congress and to my fellow Americans about international policy and its relation to the domestic economy. I will advocate a new direction America must take in the world so that we can meet the needs of our people here at home. For the past decade we have relied on the force of our arms to make America secure while our economy has rotted from within. America has lost its focus. America has spent more time concentrating on reshaping the world than on reshaping our economy. We have created hundreds of thousands of jobs for military contractors all over the world, while we just learned that we created zero jobs here in the United States in the month of August as unemployment continues to stay above 9%. Come home America. We must begin to focus on things here at home and stop roaming the world looking for dragons to slay. We have a right and an obligation to defend our nation. That includes working for peace abroad and seeking peaceful resolution of conflict, a capacity that, at our peril, we have not fully developed: I call it strength through peace. It involves the pursuit of what President Franklin Roosevelt called the “Science of Human Relations,” actually engaging those with whom we disagree most to attempt to find a way to co-exist peacefully. As Dr. Martin Luther King said at a commencement address at Oberlin College in 1965: We must find some alternative to war and bloodshed… I do not wish to minimize the complexity of the problems to be faced in achieving disarmament and peace. But we shall not have the courage, the insight, to deal with such matters unless we are prepared to undergo a mental and spiritual change. It is not enough to say we must not wage war. We must love peace and sacrifice for it. We must fix our visions not merely on the negative expulsion of war, but upon the positive affirmation of peace. We must see that peace represents a sweeter music, far superior to the discords of war. I believe the American people have the capacity to ‘undergo a mental and spiritual change’ that Dr. King spoke about. People are about that work in their own private lives everyday. The question is, does our government and those who lead it have that capacity? Are we willing to look, recognize that the path we are on leads only to destruction and poverty and are we willing to embark courageously on a new path? To those who say that this is naïve, I ask; has the strategy of military intervention, which took us and keeps us in Iraq, Afghanistan and Libya, made us any safer? The muscle-bound “with us or against us” mindset which passes for statecraft has placed us on a march of folly that in the past decade has left America with thousands of dead young soldiers, over a million dead innocents in Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan and the surrounding region, a new generation of terrorists and trillions upon trillions of dollars in debt. As poverty and war are twins, so are peace and prosperity. Mindful of the disaster of spreading war and being an eyewitness as to how easily our country seems to be drawn into conflict, I traveled to Syria this year, to personally urge their leader to stop the violence, respect human rights, and begin a transition toward a democratic state. I traveled to Lebanon afterwards to hear the concerns of leaders who also believe that the violence in Syria must stop and are concerned that if radical fundamentalism results in the overthrow of the government of Syria, the same fires will consume their own nation which developed a fragile political and social consensus after years of civil war. I opposed the war in Libya, not only because it was unconstitutional, but it was and is unconscionable for America to precipitate or take sides in a civil war, spending perhaps billions in an ongoing war while we have so many pressing needs here at home. We went in because we were told a massacre could occur, yet civilian casualties in Libya mounted after the U.S. and NATO attacked. In order to please the West, Libya cooperated with the CIA, got rid of its WMD program in 2004 and privatized its economy, resulting in massive unemployment. It was moving through to reform even as the West moved to bomb it and, inexplicably, the West moved to take up the cause of elements of Al Qaeda spurring the rebels. We learn today from CNN that the rebels and fighters aligned with them are looting weapons warehouses across Libya, where as many as 20,000 surface-to-air missiles had previously been kept under lock and key. Western officials, perhaps the same geniuses who knowingly helped Libyan rebels with ties to al Qaeda overthrow the Libyan government, are now worried the surface to air missiles and other weapons will get into the wrong hands. This lawless interventionism spurred on by an unaccountable NATO which violates United Nations Security Council resolutions with impunity, this attempt to use force to bring others to subjection in the name of democracy, actually has become a device for control over the wealth of other nations, the squandering of our own wealth, and the spreading of poverty here at home. Did our government just wake up one day and discover that 14 million Americans are out of work and that we need a massive program to put them back to work? No. It has known that for some time. War has become our great distraction. It has given those who have little or no ability to construct a fair economy an opportunity to pretend to leader at the expense of those brave men and women who serve and at the expense of the American economy and the expense of the American taxpayers. We can no longer afford participating in this wargame of nations. I opposed the war in Afghanistan, and have brought Congress to confront it several times because the U.S. has spent one half a trillion dollars trying to democratize a tribal nation while failing to spend sufficient resources to protect our democracy here at home. The latest report is that we may be in Afghanistan through 2024, at the request of the Afghanistan government. This will cost us hundreds of billions, even trillions more. Doesn’t it make more sense for America to come home, at the request of and for the benefit of the American people? I led opposition in this Congress to the war in Iraq. Nine years ago I warned this Congress that there was no reason to go to war against Iraq. I was asked at that time whose side I was on: America’s or the murderous dictator Saddam Hussein? Opposing that intervention was seen by some as coddling a murderous dictator. No matter that Hussein had opposed Al Qaeda. No matter that there was no proof that Iraq had anything to do with 9/11 or al Qaeda’s role in 9/11; no matter that Iraq did not have the intention or capability of attacking the United States and that no one had been able to show that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction. I wasn’t “for” Saddam Hussein. I was for the truth. And for peace. America pursued the war anyway. America put the lives of its sons and daughters on the line. America will spend over three trillion dollars for this war that was based on lies. And even today we find our government will not bring the troops home as promised, but instead will continue to spend billions on this stupid and corrupt war in Iraq while our own nation is falling apart. Money for war, but no money for jobs? Am I advocating isolationism? Certainly not. We need to strengthen the United Nation’s peacekeeping ability and blunt NATO’s warmaking capability. We must stop NATO from going rogue. We need a counter-terrorism strategy which brings people to justice, not which dispenses justice from 10,000 ft., with the help of Predator Drones. It is the predatory interventionism which must stop. We must stop intervening for the benefit of oil companies or other corrupt corporate interests. We cannot be the policeman of the world and lay off police and firemen in our own nation. We cannot continue to bomb bridges in other countries and say we do not have the money to build bridges here in America. We must stop pretending that America can solve all the problems in the world when we can’t solve our own problems here at home. How can we bring democracy to other nations when we are losing it at home? We cannot tell other people how to live when we have people here at home who are having difficulty living. We should look to the wisdom of Proverbs where it was written: “He who troubleth his own house shall inherit the wind” (Proverbs 11:29) and we must work to set our own house in order. There were no weapons of Mass Destruction in Iraq. But there are weapons of mass destruction here in America. Unemployment is a Weapon of Mass Destruction. Poverty is a Weapon of Mass Destruction. Homelessness is a Weapon of Mass Destruction. Inadequate education is a Weapon of Mass Destruction. Lost pension benefits are Weapons of Mass Destruction. Poor health care is a Weapon of Mass Destruction. Yet despite the obvious needs domestically, the Pentagon budget now consumes over 50% of our discretionary spending. And the Pentagon budget has grown alongside the war budget. Just this year the wars and the Pentagon budget will consume close to $1 trillion in taxpayers’ money. A trillion dollars! Do you have any idea how many jobs a trillion dollars can create? Stop the wars, trim the bloated Pentagon budget and use the savings to put America back to work. The American people want work not warfare. Can we see any clearer example of the danger of endless war? We are supposed to be impressed with the strength of our leaders who, in the name of America wield awesome weapons against states a fraction of our size while when it comes to the economy and jobs, the same leaders lack the ability to confront Wall Street, which is destroying jobs on Main Street. While spending trillions for unnecessary wars, the government bailed out the banks for $700 billion, refusing to link the bailout to mortgage modification which would have helped millions of Americans stay in their homes. The Fed, which infamously looked the other way as the financial crisis was building and failed to properly monitor the overexposure of top banks, created $1.2 trillion out of nothing and gave secret emergency loans to some of the largest banks who helped to cause the financial collapse through reckless investments. This secret money created out of nothing, but backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S., is going to fuel an international financial system which siphons wealth out of the U.S., avoids paying taxes, takes American jobs and moves them to low-wage climates. According to Bloomberg News the “$1.2 trillion peak on December 5, 2008… was almost three times the size of the U.S. federal budget deficit that year and approximates the amount of money, $1.27 trillion that is due in unpaid principal on 6.5 million homes that are in or facing foreclosure.” Secret loans went to: Morgan Stanley 107.3 Billion Citigroup $99.5 billion Bank of America $91.4 billion Goldman Sachs $69 billion and to Foreign Borrowers: Banks of Scotland $84.5 billion Zurich based UBS AG 77.2 billion How is it possible that banks too big to fail still exist? We all know that the banks will fail again. The taxpayers will be asked bail them out again; to preserve the wealth of shareholders, bondholders and executives, again. The destruction of the middle class has been accelerated by the Wall Street manipulators who brought about the collapse of the housing market destroyed trillions of wealth built into American homes. Risk, like taxes, is a yoke unfairly placed upon the shoulders of the middle class. As income and resulting wealth is being redistributed upward at a pace not seen since the 1920s, the purchasing power of the middle class has been seriously eroded. Americans have less equity in homes to fuel home equity loans to keep their consumer spending up. A third of all Americans owe more than their home is worth. How is it possible that 120 million Americans literally have no wealth, just debts: How did it happen that 150 million Americans have less wealth than the top 400 individuals? How did it come to pass that the top 13,400 households, according to David Cay Johnston, have more yearly income than the bottom 96 million Americans? Who created this economy where welfare for the wealthy creates a system where a person earning $4 billion a year managing a hedge fund pays a lower tax rate on most of his income than a person who drives a truck? In a report just released, the Pew Charitable Trust wrote : “The idea that children will grow up to be better off than their parents is a central component of the American Dream and sustains American optimism. However… a middle class upbringing does not guarantee the same status over the course of a lifetime. A third of Americans raised in the middle class… fall out of the middle as adults.” The implications are this report are chilling. America’s middle class is being destroyed. America is headed toward a two class society. Just as America could not survive half free and half slave, America cannot survive half rich and half poor. “What happens to a dream deferred?” wrote Langston Hughes. “Does it dry up, Like a raisin in the sun? Or fester like a sore – - And then run? Does it stink like rotten meat? Or crust and sugar over Like a syrupy sweet? Maybe it just sags Like a heavy load. Or does it explode?” It is democracy itself which at risk here. An economic democracy is a precondition of a political democracy. With endless wars, without solid jobs to sustain a middle class, a new national security state armed with the Patriot Act, will exist primarily to provide surveillance of a growing, bristling poverty class. America knew this forty-four years ago, when on February 29, 1968, The Report of the National Advisory Commission on Civil Disorders or Kerner Report pronounced: “Our nation is moving toward two societies, one black, one white — separate and unequal.” Then the inequalities were in lack of access to opportunities for jobs, housing, education and social services. In 1998, thirty years after the Kerner Report, Senator Fred Harris, said, “there is more poverty in America, it is deeper, blacker and browner than before, and it is more concentrated in the cities, which have become America’s poorhouses.” The inequalities exist today. Just since January of 2009, unemployment has skyrocketed among African Americans from 12.7% to 16.7%. Among, Hispanics the unemployment rate is currently 11.3% While intensifying among people of color, poverty today is colorblind. Foreclosures have spread through all American neighborhoods as a wildfire, consuming with it the hopes and dreams of millions. We had a moral urgency to address unemployment in the inner cities, but we failed as a society to do that. We have learned that writ large, the fate of people who live in our cities has been the fate of those who live in the suburbs, because the same massive economic machinery that for generations was crushing the hopes of millions of inner city Americans — banks who disinvested, insurance companies who redlined, businesses which pulled out, this same plague is now visited throughout America. The official unemployment figure of 9.1% conceals a much larger, more devastating picture in America. According to a recent study by Youngstown State University: the de facto unemployment rate, as conceived and computed by their center for Working Class Studies, is 26.37% This figure includes individuals who are no longer looking for work (discouraged), underemployed and those who are marginally employed. Corporations are sitting on trillions of dollars and not hiring because of “uncertainty,” insinuating that small changes in federal regulations or tax policy are killing jobs. Yet we know that massive changes in federal tax policy and government regulations have taken place at periods of great economic growth in the United States. Our economy has not hit a rough spot in the road; it has hit a wall. The greatest losers in today’s economic system are the young. They have been fleeced. They were promised good jobs with good pay if they got a good education. Millions have done that only to discover that the jobs we promised were not there. Millions of young people have moved in with their family and friends, barely scraping by, dreading student loans that they have to repay. The dread when those loans come due. The major fault in the domestic economy is the failure to provide well paying jobs for Americans. The reasons for the high unemployment and low paying jobs are many, but two major reasons stand out: lack of consumer demand and stagnant wages accompanying low union participation. There is a lack of consumer demand in an economy that is 70% dependent on consumer spending. There are those who say we can spur demand with more tax cuts for businesses. This fails the test of experience. Business received tax cuts. We still have high unemployment. Business profits are greater than ever. Investment is less. We have learned from the past few years that businesses will not invest while economy is in bad shape. Since World War II, America has come out of every recession in less than a year, but this time we have had a false recovery. The economic numbers improved briefly, while stimulus was injected. Today we are back in recession, a double dip recession that is destroying people’s lives and setting back our nation. We did not have enough stimulus to begin with. As the stimulus runs out things are getting worse. The recession is feeding on itself. In 1937, a second round of depression surfaced as stimulus was withdrawn, requiring another effort by the government to stabilize the economy. The parallel between 1937 and 2011 is obvious. We need a second stimulus. It has to be strong enough to put millions of Americans back to work. State and local governments are forced to lay off people by the hundreds of thousands. These layoffs are not introducing efficiency. They undermine service and reduce the necessary role of government in the life of a community. Massive aid is needed to all areas of government, not because governments have spent recklessly, but because revenues are down. Income tax revenue is down. Sales tax revenue is down. Property tax revenue is down due to foreclosures. We can stimulate the economy by providing revenue to rehire state and local government employees. That is the easiest way to put hundreds of thousands back to work. This is an obvious way to stimulate the economy on a significant scale. State, local government, public schools, public and private college would all have an enhanced ability to restore service. Such a stimulus would create an economic climate where businesses will expand their investment, utilizing their own profit. The same thing is true in the housing area. The government must immediately implement a new housing program. More and more properties are becoming vacant and vandalized, while people are doubling up. We need a full-scale program where economically troubled homeowners are given the right to rent, at a market rate, property in foreclosure. The government would provide a rent subsidy while the homeowners seek work. The American people want work, not welfare. There should be work for those who are able to work. Government must become the employer of last resort. The private sector is not providing the jobs. When the private sector fails to provide the jobs, the government has a moral responsibility and a practical responsibility to step forward to put the country back to work. As with FDR and the New Deal, the government must now put millions of Americans back to work rebuilding our infrastructure. The American Society of Civil Engineers issued a report that $2.2 trillion in infrastructure rebuilding must take place to move the commerce of America. It is not enough to describe the situation and to make a few suggestions as to what could be done to take us in a new direction. There comes a time when we need to look at some dramatic change that needs to be done to restructure our economy. This month I am going to be introducing a bill which will be aimed at addressing our structural economic problems directly. It is called the National Employment Economic Defense act — the NEED Act. America needs millions of jobs. How can we create millions of jobs in a time of annual deficits, long-term debt and contracting budgets? Here’s how: The Federal Reserve creates money out of nothing and it has given it to banks. The Fed has assumed that power through an Act of Congress. The Federal Reserve has used all of its standard monetary policy tools. But the American economy is not getting better. Whatever the Fed is doing, it is not working. The reason why is perhaps best explained by the Fed itself: “The Fed can’t control inflation or influence output and employment.” The Fed has been buying Treasury and other securities to put downward pressure on interest rates. The idea is to lower finance costs, encourage more borrowing and nudge investors into riskier investments. This provides breathing space but little else. Consumers are already over their heads in debt and they aren’t going to borrow more. Neither will producers, when sales are slack. Higher default rates are widening spreads. Many investors will still prefer to make a small gain on government securities rather than risk taking losses. Reality beats theory. The reality is that not enough people have enough money. Why is this? Where does our money come from? Why isn’t it coming? The Fed doesn’t create money we use in our bank accounts. The banks do. Most of this money is created when banks make loans. This is why the Fed can’t control inflation or influence output and employment. Output and employment depend on demand. Demand depends on how much money people have, or can borrow. Because banks create this money, they control demand. If banks aren’t lending or borrowers aren’t borrowing, new money isn’t being created to replace the money removed when bank loans are paid, so the money supply shrinks. The Fed can only put more money into the economy by buying assets from non-banks. No money goes into the economy when the Fed buys their assets. It’s just a swap of one asset for another, called reserves. Banks can’t lend reserves into the economy. The non-bank sellers of assets are mainly large institutional investors. They don’t spend much of the money they receive, they reinvest it in other assets — that is their business. But this churning of assets up in the stratosphere doesn’t “trickle down” to earth. The real economy of families, shops and small businesses of roads and schools is bypassed. We know this. The money is not getting to where it is needed. Until it does, things can only get worse. None of the current policies work because of the way the current system is set up. Here is how we fix it. We have to reclaim our Constitutional power to issue money into the economy, unburdened by debt. Last Congress I introduced legislation to do just that, and I am reintroducing it next week. Here is what the legislation does: It ends the Fed’s unaccountability by putting it under Treasury. It ends fractional reserve banking, ending banks’ ability to control demand in our economy. It empowers our nation to issue money directly into the economy to create jobs to rebuild our crumbling infrastructure, unhindered by debt and interest payments – - creating millions of new, well-paying jobs. It gets the money to where it is needed the most. It gets the economy going and keeps it going. It avoids debt and deficits. It primes the pump of the economy. It enables us to regain control of our destiny as a nation. This plan would not create inflation because it would reduce infrastructure costs. Lower costs means prices can go down. Lower prices do not define inflation. Real wealth will be created with the new money. Infrastructure is enduring wealth, unlike the “financial wealth” of the stock market. If government borrows money created by banks for infrastructure it is an interest bearing debt, paid for over a long time. But if government creates money for infrastructure and spends it into circulation, there’s no debt or interest costs. The same amount of money is created in either case, adding to the money supply by exactly the same amount. This is also a way to save the free enterprise system from self-destruction. The American people know what is going on in our economy. It is run by Wall Street for Wall Street. It is run by banks for banks. Unless we look at serious structural reforms we are headed for a two class society. The ability to coin or create money is an inherent power under Article I, Section 8 of the United States Constitution. The NEED Act would enable the government to invest in America. This coming Sunday we will observe the 10th anniversary of a terrible blow to our nation’s sense of security and confidence. We will never forget September 11, 2011. But we also need to remember the enduring capacity of our nation to bounce back from tragedy. We need to remember what this country is made of. America is made of vision and courage: the courage and vision of Washington, Jefferson and Adams to put lives, fortune, sacred honor on the line for the purpose of freedom and independence. We are the country of FDR and the New Deal, of John F. Kennedy and the New Frontier, of LBJ and the Great Society. We are a nation of charismatic leaders like Ronald Reagan and Bill Clinton, who, agree with them or not, inspired a sense of optimism and confidence in America. We need to remember who we are. And in the act of remembering we will regain our confidence, we will regain our economic strength, we will put people back to work, we will help millions save their homes, we will protect the retirement security of elderly Americans, we will ensure that our children will be able to obtain a college education and a job when they graduate. We will restore our public institutions and the services they provide. We can do all of this and more. But we must ask that those who operate the engines of finance to abandon their recklessness, their selfishness and pledge allegiance to our nation and its people. We must demand that corporations pay a fair share of the taxes. We must end the off-shoring of jobs and profits. While some our leaders, with trembling hands and nervous eyes have focused abroad, our country is falling apart from within. America was never meant for decline. America was always meant for an upward, uplit path. We now must correct our course. We must move away from trying to determine the fate of nations around the globe and focus on the fate on the one nation that must matter to us more than all others — The United States of America! This speech was delivered to Congress on September 7, 2011. See video of the address here .

Read the full article →

Tom Silva: Made in America?

September 9, 2011

I’ve been hearing the phrase “Made in America” quite a bit recently, welcoming the repatriation of jobs back to the US from China, India and the rest of the off-shore parabola. Most reports have focused on the price of oil being the primary driver, but the return of outsourced jobs is far more sweeping in its implications. Make no mistake, outsourcing will continue: One report estimates that the global outsourcing industry will rise to just under $500 billion by 2016. However, it seems clear that three decades after offshoring emerged as the best way for Corporate America to lower its breakeven cost of doing business, we are now seeing a reverse migration, primarily because the fallacies of low-cost labor markets have been exposed. It’s a function not only of rising production costs, but a flight from unregulated overseas markets where companies have found that they cannot assert their rights to quality control and intellectual property. (Let’s consider this the next time we hear the canard that “All regulation is bad because it puts business in a stranglehold.” Ironically, regulation can be a magnet for business). To deal briefly with cost, it is irrefutable that companies have circumnavigated their operations back to the US because overseas workers are becoming more expensive : According to a recent report by Boston Consulting Group , in 2000, hourly Chinese manufacturing wages were just 52 cents compared to $16.61 in the U.S. By 2015, the wage difference should be $4.41 vs. $26.06 — hardly parity, but no longer a slam-dunk case when you consider that US workers are three times more productive. The income growth rate is expected to continue to build in China while BCG predicts the US will grow at a much slower pace. Oil prices compounded this spike in the cost of outsourcing: During the last run up in oil prices prior to the financial crisis in 2008, investment bank CIBC calculated that a $1 rise in world oil prices translated to a 1% rise in transport costs. With oil around $120 a barrel, the cost of shipping a 40-foot container from Shanghai to the U.S. Eastern seaboard jumped to $8,000 from $3,000 in 2000. “At $20 a barrel for oil, transport costs were equivalent to U.S. tariffs of just 3%,” CIBC wrote. But today’s $150 barrel oil realities imply tariffs of 11%, harkening back to the average tariffs of the 1970s. In the last four years, shipping costs have risen 71% because of higher oil prices, as well as cutbacks in ships and containers, according to IHS Global Insight. While the discussion of energy costs has focused on the economics of transportation, more interesting are the infrastructure weaknesses that the staggering growth rates in countries like China have exposed. According to Trevor Houser from economic research firm, The Rhodium Group, electricity costs have skyrocketed: 6.1 cents per kilowatt hour in 2001 (when they first joined the World Trade Organization) to 11.6 cents per kWh and climbing. In contrast, the U.S. has only risen from 4.73 to 6.7 in that same time period.Rolling blackouts (a news-worthy rarity in America) are common overseas. You simply can’t maintain full speed when you’re operating with an antiquated engine. Then there’s that large unwieldy relay, the Global Supply Chain, shuttling the latest cool product from factory to fan base. Accenture recently found in their study of 287 businesses that “Companies are beginning to realize that having offshored much of their manufacturing and supply operations away from their demand locations [has] hurt their ability to meet their customers’ expectations across a wide spectrum of areas, such as being able to rapidly meet increasing customer desires for unique products, continuing to maintain rapid delivery/response times, as well as maintaining low inventories and competitive total costs.” Simply put, if you’re a TV manufacturer and Best Buy calls to request more beveled-edge titanium flat screens for next month, you can’t fill the order because the factory in Shenzhen wouldn’t be able to build and ship them fast enough to beat your locally-based competitor. Practically half the participants in the same survey reported crippling issues with production cycle delays, while 46 percent face quality control fallout from overseas manufacturing and supply. Additionally, global supply chains have been bedeviled by the shift in weather patterns and the spate of natural disasters. The March earthquake and tsunami in Japan, aside from the human tragedy, disrupted global supply chains, leaving many companies stranded without critical components, including Boeing, Caterpillar, and General Motors. Quality also presents a significant issue, more difficult to address when your delivery chain resembles the hub and spokes of a bicycle: If a problem is discovered in parts reaching customers in the United States, the fault could occur anywhere on the supply chain stretching all the way across continents. That makes the true cost of manufacturing offshore in places such as China much more than the quoted price of the parts on the RFQ. One of the rudest awakenings for American companies about the realities of outsourcing has been around the issue of intellectual property and piracy. Having grown up in a part of the world where every video was a third-generation knock-off encased in a photocopied sleeve, I’ve always been stunned at the ingenuity, rapacity and speed of the black market. It’s difficult, if not impossible, to enforce patents, copyrights, and other laws in many parts of the world. Take Farouk Systems Inc of Houston, Texas. A manufacturer of high-demand luxury hair care implements, company founder Farouk Shami contracted with a Chinese molding company, only to find that his designs were being pilfere d and his CHI products counterfeited. Shami fought for several years to no avail. His struggle with the Asian Black Market reads like Hercules battling a modern-day Hydra. As soon as one was shuttered, another operation would spring forth, ” sometimes right next door to the first one”. This painful lesson in international production cost him half a million dollars per month in customer service, replacing badly made irons and dryers bearing his brand name. Eyes opened, he has returned his production stateside, employing custom injection molders in his home state, leveraging high-volume, long-term contracts to receive impeccable U.S. quality, for about the same pricing that initially lured him to China. “You don’t have laws in China that will protect you against IP theft,” adds Rick Admani Abulhaj, COO of Diagnostic Devices Inc. of Charlotte, North Carolina. “We have a lot of investment in our IP, and we have more control over it in the U.S.” As a producer of blood -glucose machines, on which thousands of lives depend, he also believes strongly in the quality control advantage of U.S. production. “We have to adhere to FDA regulations,” he says. “When you make products in the U.S., you make them to a higher standard; particularly in healthcare, the FDA is the law. If you don’t comply, you get your products recalled. In China there are no ramifications.” So, the mishegoss that is the overseas market means that all those sorely needed production jobs are coming back home for Christmas, right? Not entirely. Consider how all this started in the first place: The landscape of the American economy was forever altered in 1948 under the aegis of the Marshall Plan. Prior to that, America was a self-supporting system: We made what we used. But in order to help restore war-ravaged Europe and Asia, manufacturing was shifted abroad. By the Reagan era, manufacturing employed only 25 percent of U.S. labor force. We have since fallen to a mere 12 percent. Something has definitely changed in the paradigm since the 1940′s, namely this: the key to domestic manufacturing isn’t so much labor as automation . The numbers tell the story emphatically: While manufacturing as a percentage of the labor force has nearly halved since 1980, the value of goods and services produced has remained static. Here’ the kicker: Based on first-quarter GDP, we produced slightly more goods and services locally than before the recession — but utilizing 7.3 million fewer workers. Factory output is 55 percent higher than a decade ago, while factory employment is 32 percent lower. The jobs that remain typically require sophisticated skills and higher education than the average laborer of the past. (Translation: Companies can produce more with fewer workers using new machinery operated by college-accredited workers.) American factories have recouped nearly all of their losses since the crisis, and are now back at nearly full productivity — employing a skeleton crew. Corporations are sitting on about $1.8 trillion in cash, buoyed by record profits and stock prices which have doubled from their recession lows. It is evident that there is no longer a strict correlation between hiring and corporate revenues. The future is shaping up to look like this: labor-intensive low-cost things will continue to be made overseas. America, on the other hand, will continue to excel at making big, complex, expensive items. In the late 1990s, America’s manufacturing stagnated at the $4 trillion mark. But then we found our niche — in tractors, steel, plastics, knives and medicines. According to the U.S. Census Bureau, manufacturing hit a record $5 trillion in 2006 — and heavy machinery was where it was at. Today, mining, farm and construction equipment are up 20 percent since 2002. Revenue from coal products and refinery activity nearly doubled during that self-same period. The business of refining and processing raw materials (iron, steel, aluminum and copper) has increased 40 percent. Chemical manufacturing, notably pharmaceuticals, grew 22 percent. We also do well in plastics, software and telecommunications. The Specialty Blades factory in Staunton, VA makes blades that impact all aspects of our lives, from scalpels in the emergency room to the little gadgets that tear off our grocery receipts. The company’s rank and file aren’t unskilled factory workers but engineers, working with surgeons to create a plethora of sophisticated tools, including a circular cutting and stapling device which reduces the invasiveness of digestive-tract surgery. “U.S. engineering is flat-out way more developed than in China for this function,” says the company’s CEO, Peter Harris. In July 2008, Deloitte published Made in North America , taking a C-level look at U.S. production. When the 321 executive participants were asked where they intended to expand production, 37 percent said Mexico, while another 37 percent indicated China would grow as their hub of operations. Similarly, India and Canada drew equal favor with 24 percent apiece. How did the United States fare? 44 percent. While that’s great news for production, it’s not nearly as auspicious for employment, as these factories may be staffed by robotics rather than real people. Some have cited the need for the innovation economy to fill the void left by traditional manufacturing, particularly in the science, technology, engineering and math fields (STEM). However, when the Bureau of Labor Statistics qualified the 97 categories of STEM, it reflected only 6% of the ready US workforce. In the end, what we need is a game-changer — disruptive technology like the internet — to drive the employment sector. We all know that Made in America is still a good thing. A great thing. It just doesn’t mean what it used to. **************************************************************************************************************** Special thanks to contributions from co-author, Heather M. Carper . Heather is a Chicago-based Writer, Researcher, and Social Media strategist, who is currently outsourcing some of her finely honed American-made skillset to meet the needs of the primarily South Asian clients of the Indo-American Center .

Read the full article →