article

Elon Musk Divorcing!

by Jennifer Lai on January 19, 2012

Huffington Post…

Elon Musk announced via Twitter Wednesday that he and his wife, British actress Talulah Riley, are splitting after just over one year of marriage. The SpaceX founder, who has also co-founded PayPal and Tesla , told Forbes Thursday that Riley moved out of their Bel Air home six months ago: “We took some time apart for several months to see if absence makes the heart grow fonder, and unfortunately it did not. I still love her, but I’m not in love with her. And I can’t really give her what she wants.” Despite their split, Musk said that the two would “always be friends.” Musk originally met the “Pride and Prejudice” and “St Trinian’s” star (who is thirteen years his junior) in July 2008 at a nightclub in London . He reportedly proposed to Riley just weeks after he filed for divorce from his first wife, sci-fi novelist Justine Musk, with whom he has five children . Musk and Riley wed in September 2010 . It’s unclear if Musk, who’s worth an estimated $672 million , and Riley have a prenup. Musk has been quick to speak out about the split this time around, perhaps in an attempt to avoid what happened with his last divorce. His 2008 split from Justine Musk was a messy and high-profile affair , with his ex-wife blogging and speaking publicly about their divorce — even challenging the validity of their post-nuptial agreement . Musk responded to those allegations on The Huffington Post in July 2010, writing, “Given the choice, I’d rather stick a fork in my hand than write about my personal life. Unfortunately, it seems that I don’t have any other option. Several awful things have been widely reported that are simply false, but a falsehood uncorrected may as well be truth.” WATCH what Musk’s ex-wife said about their 2008 divorce:

See more here:
Elon Musk Divorcing!

Find our Weekly Commercial Real Estate, Private Equity and Fund Newsletters at www.WeeklyBrief.net

{ 0 comments }

Solar energy

by on January 19, 2012

menafn.com…

(MENAFN – Arab News) In his article, “Harnessing solar energy” (Jan. 15), Mumtaz Rizvi lists wind, water and sun as alternatives to energy derived from fossil fuels. What is glaringly absent …

See the original post:
Solar energy

Find our Weekly Commercial Real Estate, Private Equity and Fund Newsletters at www.WeeklyBrief.net

{ 0 comments }

Handful Of Americans Account For Half Of U.S. Health Care Costs

January 17, 2012

The cost of health care may have gone up for almost all Americans in recent years, but a handful of consumers are getting hit especially hard. Just five percent of Americans accounted for half of the country’s health care costs in 2009 , according to a report from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Though the findings indicate that a small share of the population is responsible for much of the country’s health care costs, the concentration right at the top is actually going down, the report found — one percent of Americans accounted for 22 percent of health care costs in 2009, down from 28 percent in 2008. Baby boomers — those between the ages of 45 and 64 — and the elderly were overly represented among the top health care spenders, the report found . Women and white Americans were additionally overly represented among the top health care spenders. Children and young adults were disproportionately represented among the bottom half of spenders. Relief from skyrocketing health care costs may be in sight. Overall health care spending as a share of the nation’s economy stabilized in 2010 , after two years of slow growth, according to a government report released earlier this month. Still, if health care spending is only stabilizing because of the sluggish economy, costs may not be slowing for good. Indeed, if current estimates prove correct, the nation’s health care spending is on track to comprise a fifth of the U.S. economy by the end of the decade , according to a July report from Medicare’s Office of the Actuary. Should that prediction prove true, it would be up from the roughly 17 percent of GDP health care spending accounted for last year. This is nothing new; domestic health care spending has been on the rise for years. In 2008, Americans spent more than three times on health care than what they spent just 18 years before , according to a Kaiser report. Health care costs accounted for more than 15 percent of U.S. gross domestic product by that time — one of the highest rates of industrialized nations. The rising cost of paying medical bills has hit Americans especially hard in recent years. The total number of Americans with health insurance fell in 2010 for the first time in decades , CNNMoney reports. All told, the number of Americans without health insurance rose to 49.9 million that year , according to Census Bureau data.

Read the full article →

GOP Candidates Decry Extended Unemployment Benefits

January 17, 2012

Republican presidential candidates sharply criticized extended unemployment insurance during Monday evening’s debate in South Carolina, where the unemployment rate is 9.9 percent. “I think we have to look at having a reasonable time for people to be able to come back, get a job and then turn their lives around,” former Sen. Rick Santorum said in response to a question from Brett Baier of Fox News. “But what we’ve seen in the past under this administration is extending benefits up to 99 weeks. I don’t support that. I think if you have people who are out of work that long a period of time, it’s without question, it makes it harder to find work when you come back.” Congress has given the long-term jobless additional weeks of unemployment benefits in every recession since the 1950s. In 2009 lawmakers increased the duration of federal benefits to 73 weeks in hard-hit states. The compensation kicks in for workers who use up 26 weeks of state-funded benefits. Research has shown that the longer people are out of work, the more trouble they have finding new jobs. But the latest research has not shown that the current regimen of extended benefits is significantly increasing long-term unemployment. Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich suggested the unemployed should have to do job training in order to qualify for benefits. “All unemployment compensation should be tied to a job training requirement,” Gingrich said. “If somebody can’t find a job and they show up and they say, you know, ‘I need help,’ the help we ought to give them is to get them connected to a business-run training program to acquire the skills to be employable. Now the fact is, 99 weeks is an associate degree.” According to the Congressional Research Service , people with advanced degrees are no less likely than high school dropouts to join the ranks of the 99ers. There are roughly 1.9 million people who’ve been out of work for 99 weeks or longer, up from 1.4 million in December 2010. Santorum said he supported allowing states more freedom to craft unemployment policies. “What I believe, just like I did with welfare reform — when we reformed welfare, we sent it back to the states and we gave the states the flexibility to design these programs,” Santorum said. “Just as I would do here with unemployment insurance. It should go back to the states, let the states design it. If South Carolina, because of a unique situation, wants to have a longer unemployment period of time because of a unique situation here, fine. But to have a federal program that roughly and crudely tries to assess the problem of unemployment from state to state and area to area is the wrong approach.” States have more control of unemployment insurance than Santorum suggested. They already do administer their own unemployment programs within federal guidelines. South Carolina was one of several states last year to cut the duration of state-funded benefits from 26 to 20 weeks, and South Carolina lawmakers are mulling proposals to require drug testing and volunteer work for claimants. The full complement of federal benefits is only available in states with high unemployment rates. Rep. Ron Paul (R-Texas) sounded a more compassionate note during the debate, saying he opposed extended unemployment insurance but that benefits shouldn’t be cut abruptly. “A little while ago we were talking about funding the unemployed and of course that should be privatized and I don’t support it, but I don’t support cutting it off like that,” Paul said. “I would cut some of the military spending like Eisenhower advises, watch out for the military complex.” In December, Congress reauthorized extended unemployment insurance programs through February, but it did so in a way that will allow the final 20 weeks of benefits to phase out in one state after another over the course of this year even if the programs are preserved beyond February.

Read the full article →

We Watch Newt’s ‘King Of Bain’ Attack On Mitt So You Don’t Have To

January 11, 2012

When Newt Gingrich made clear that he was going to respond to getting constantly slagged by Mitt Romney’s super PAC-funded attack ads in Iowa, Lord only knows that Gingrich had plenty of options. He could knock Romney for innumerable flip-flops as he’s pandered his way through his political career, telling whatever audience he was standing in front of what he thought they wanted to hear. He could tar Romney as the man who provided the vital DNA for the Affordable Care Act that all GOP candidates are required to abhor and vow to repeal, despite the sunnier disposition toward Romney’s health care achievement in 2008. He could fillet Romney for being a conservative apostate — he didn’t merely run in a leftward direction in order to win the Massachusetts statehouse, he assured voters that he would be a moderating influence on the Republican Party, dragging the platform in a more liberal direction. Indeed, at various times, Gingrich has fired shots at Romney, mining these areas and others in an attempt to tear him down. But what no one could have possibly expected — and, judging from the reactions of conservatives, which I would describe as “mortal terror” — what no one on the right could have possibly wanted , was for Gingrich to launch an all-out assault on Romney’s Bain Capital roots, and eviscerate the candidate for being a predatory capitalist. But that is exactly what Gingrich has done, and done with astounding thoroughness, by acquiring the rights to a 28-minute attack documentary that’s come to be known as “King Of Bain.” Made ” by former Romney supporters ,” the result is a potent polemic — combining Ken Burns’ style, the darkness of the “Daisy” ad, and a bottomless reservoir of immutable rage — that paints Romney as a dark-hearted, vicious-minded, boodle-craving technocrat-privateer. It very trenchantly depicts the lives of ordinary people faced with declining job prospects and mounting expenses. It decries the indifference of Romney’s brand of capitalism, and puts a human face on income inequality. If you wanted to mount an argument against corporate personhood on the grounds that a corporation cannot have a moral compass, this will do the trick. In fact, if you screened this before an Occupy encampment, it would almost certainly draw a thunderous ovation. And if you are a GOP strategist, hoping to reclaim the White House in 2012, that’s the problem. Rather than assail Romney in the ways you would expect a conservative to do so during a presidential primary, Gingrich has jumped ahead of the process and grabbed the very argument that Democrats would have happily made to swing voters, and aimed it right at the GOP base. If we assume that Romney is the eventual nominee, then Gingrich and his super PAC, Winning Our Future, have saved the DNC and the Obama campaign a whole lot of time and money. And the attack has now forced Republicans to stand in defense of a specific form of predatory capitalism . Mind you, they’re all for that particular form of predatory capitalism! But they don’t enjoy having being made to defend it publicly, in an election year. Let me briefly describe this video addendum to the Marx-Engels Reader that Newt Gingrich has made, for America. Lights up on a shot of sky, clouds billowing, piano tinkling wistfully. The camera switches to generic depictions of industry and thrift as a voice-over narrator assures us that “Capitalism made America great” and has been a part of “American dreams.” Yes, for as long as we can remember, there has been stock footage attesting to this, and a lot of it is in this movie. But in the wrong person’s hands, we are told, “some of those dreams can turn into nightmares.” Sudden percussion sound and a dark filter? Yep. Sudden percussion sound and a dark filter. Clouds blacken, as the narrator calls out Wall Street raiders, enriching themselves at the expense of American workers. Those seamy Wall Streeters, we are told, were known for their greed — “greed that’s only matched by their willingness to do anything to make millions in profits.” Great line, by the way. “Vincent Van Gogh’s painting talent was matched only by his ability to make beautiful paintings.” “Scarlet’s reddish hue was matched only by its crimson tint.” The comparisons to the rhetoric of Occupy Wall Street, right out of the gates, is apt, save for the commercial’s ineptness. Soon enough, we’re introduced to the villain of this epic — Mitt Romney, head of Bain Capital. His “mission,” we are told, is personal enrichment, and we’re introduced to random working-class types who attest to the fact that Romney doesn’t care about the little guy. “But let’s look deeper. Let’s look deeper at his life,” says one. I predict that we are about to go deeper, and so we shall, taking a look at four instances of lives ruined by Mitt Romney and his insatiable quest to remodel his homes. “For tens of thousands, the suffering began … when Mitt Romney came to town.” And that’s the first twist. This movie isn’t called “King Of Bain.” It’s called “When Mitt Romney Came To Town.” We are introduced, briefly, to Mitt Romney, his Harvard education, and his love for “stripping American businesses of assets” and “killing jobs.” First stop on the road to ruin: Marianna, Fla. Here we learn about a local manufacturer of laundry equipment that got sold to Bain Capital. From there, everything went to crap — production sped up, quality went down, pay slashed, stress mounted. In the end, we’re told Romney “upended the company” and made big profits while “leaving behind a trail of wreckage.” But then Romney turned his sights on KB Toys and destroyed it in similar fashion. This ruined the lives of children. We know this because we see a child, staring into a television flicker, as the sounds of news reports of KB’s demise fill the background. The look on the child’s face says it all: “Oh no. The KB Toys chain is gone, and it was a brand with which I really identified.” We learn that Bain reaped a 900 percent return on investment as 15,000 jobs were lost, which the Boston Herald says was “disgusting.” “Romney called it creative destruction,” the narrator tells us. OK, but really, it was economist Joseph Schumpeter who called it that, but anyway! The ad develops the theme from there, defining “The Bain way” as profiting from the misfortunes of others. We move on to DDi, a technology company that Bain was involved in, courtesy of disgraced Lehman Brothers. Bain, we are told, quickly fired workers, and just as quickly reaped the reward of an increased share value. But Bain dumped the shares, reaping profit, before the stock crashed, and DDI filed for bankruptcy. “Average investors without insider connections were left with huge losses,” we are told, in a way that makes it sound like insider trading is some sort of virtuous pursuit. The sticking point here is that Romney denied having anything to do with this particular pump-and-dump scheme, because he was off saving the Winter Olympics, but documentation proved this wasn’t the case. Finally, we go to Marion, Ind., “which used to be such a booming town … but overnight it changed.” We’re guessing Bain was involved? Yes — there was a paper company that ended up “on Bain’s radar.” The same story plays out — workers cashiered, pay cut, quality diminished, wealth extracted, and lives ruined, as Bain pushed down on the throttle. “Every night I listen to the news and I get very upset,” says one Marionite. “Some nights it doesn’t pay me to listen to it … especially when a certain candidate for president, that ticks my ticker [appears].” (SPOILER ALERT: She is referring to Mitt Romney.) The snows of uncertainty fall, as people drive off, into the distance, leaving their lives behind, borne back ceaselessly into the past, etc. Metaphorically speaking. Also, this ruined Christmas for some. “To Romney and Bain Capital, it was just another deal … for others, it was a pit of despair.” One elderly woman sets up the final turn of the plot: “He’s a money man, and he’s going to look out for the money people. He didn’t look out for us little peons … so you put him over everything, then what? What’s going to happen then?” Well, the violins quicken to a frenzy and the voice-over testimonials grow to a desperate tone, and we’re given a chance to imagine what a Romney White House would look like — broken windows, lonely windmills, derelict buildings, a lone piggy bank falls and shatters. A crowd chants “Wall Street greed.” The phrase “the almighty dollar” is spoken aloud with a disparaging snort. And not for the first time, you think, “Wait. This is being disseminated by a Republican?” But it is, and it is unsparing in its criticism of Mitt Romney. In the world of this movie, Romney doesn’t merely make money, he goes on a “cash rampage.” He doesn’t have colleagues, he has “hatchet men.” And somewhere in the shadows of Bain, “wealthy Latin American investors” lurk, being vaguely “other.” And there is not a trace of American exceptionalism to be found in the video, because its makers have spared no effort to make Romney out to be a hyper-effete, itchy-palmed liege-lord, swelling above the peons with perfect hair and expensive suits. Romney speaks French. He has many homes. He’s always at his happiest the moment one of Bain’s downtrodden victims spills their sad story. Who on earth thought it would be a good idea to take a picture of Romney getting his shoes shined on a airport tarmac with a jet in the background? Don’t know! But Gingrich’s pet filmmakers got that picture, and used it. And they make great use of Romney’s recent flubs on the stump. That time he calls himself an unemployed person? It’s in there. His insistence that he knows how an economy works? You’ll see it. But the clip that gets the biggest workout is the one where Romney attests that “corporations are people” because all the money a corporation makes goes to people. Again and again, the film deploys the end of that exchange, where Romney, over the objections and jeers of a critical crowd, sarcastically yells, “Where do you think goes? Whose pockets?” On the off chance you’re resistant to a filmmaker that beats you over the head, repeatedly, with an anvil, the answer they’re reaching for is “Romney’s pockets.” Again, wow: this is being distributed by a Republican, not a Democrat. Purchased by a Gingrich super PAC, not MoveOn.org. And it’s not been slapped together — real care and real research went into this. But while plenty of GOP establishment types have a range of negative feelings about Romney — from distrust to derision — it’s perfectly understandable that they’d blanch at the sight of this video, and then become aghast at the way the Rick Perry and Jon Huntsman have followed Gingrich into this strange new encampment. Rick Santorum, by the way, has stayed out of this fray. And Ron Paul has risen to Mitt’s defense . And that tells you all you need to know about what motivates this argument in the first place — it’s the last resort of desperate candidates, who — led by Gingrich — have opted to set fire to the common rules of Republican Party politesse and a substantial portion of its codified economic worldview in an effort to prevent Romney from running away with the nomination. The only thing that separates Newt — the man who’s essentially responsible for this thing being out in the world — and the candidates who have leapt onto this anti-capitalist bandwagon, is Gingrich’s extraordinarily boundless need for vindication. This is the product of a man who now wants to destroy Mitt Romney so badly that he’s willing to risk his own excommunication. ( But he’s now beginning to realize he may have made a mistake .) The “King Of Bain” attack ads start hitting the airwaves tomorrow . Pop some corn. [Would you like to follow me on Twitter ? Because why not?]

Read the full article →

David Isenberg: FAR 49.402-4(b) to the Rescue

January 10, 2012

From an oversight perspective, the situation in Iraq today where the bulk of private military and security contractors are now working for the State Department, and not the U.S. military, is certainly interesting, and more than a little ironic. I mean after all, how diligent can the client, the U.S. State Department, be in overseeing its contractors, when those very same contractors are responsible for preserving the security, indeed, the very lives of all the client’s staff in Iraq? Saying “do better or I’ll fire you and do it myself” isn’t a viable solution. This bring us to the article, “Private Military Contractor Liability Under the Worldwide Personal Protective Services II Contract” published in the Spring 2009 issue of Public Contract Law Journal by Samuel P. Cheadle, then a student at the George Washington University Law School. WPPS is the State Department’s effort to pre-plan, organize, set up, deploy and operate contractor protective service details around the world. It has also been the main cash cow for what was once Blackwater, now Academi . Its primary public contract was WPPS and WPPS II umbrella contracts, along with DynCorp International and Triple Canopy, Inc. for protective services in Iraq, Afghanistan, Bosnia and Israel. This is not a contract which will go down in contracting history for its transparency. In January 2010, the state’s inspector general office released its August 2009 Memorandum Report on the Preliminary Review of the Second Worldwide Personal Protective Services (WPPS II) Contract Task Orders . The memo informed various State offices of the audit cancellation of the WPPS II contracts due to “insufficient documentation.” The Department of State’s Bureau of Diplomatic Security contracts with Triple Canopy, the U.S. Training Center (formerly Blackwater), and DynCorp for personal protective services around the world, including Jerusalem, Iraq, and Afghanistan. OIG’s review of Triple Canopy, Blackwater, and Dyncorp contract TOs found insufficient documentation to meet the objectives of the audits. Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 4.805 requires contract files listed in FAR 4.803 to be retained for a minimum of six years and three months after the disbursement of the final payment on the contract. OIG requested 34 contract and procurement documents for each TO. The table below depicts the number of documents provided for review and the number not available for review. Based on DIG’s receiving insufficient documentation during its preliminary review of the Office of Acquisition Management, DIG is cancelling the following previously announced audits immediately: …. Audit of Contract Administration of the DynCorp Second Worldwide Protective Services (WPPS II) Contract in Iraq, Task Order 009, under Contract Number S-AQM-PD-05-D1099; … Audit of Contract Administration of the Triple Canopy Second Worldwide Personal Protective Services Contract in Iraq, Task Order 007, under Contract Number S-AQM-PD05-D-1100. I’ve written before on the limitations of such laws and regulations as the Military Extraterritorial Jurisdiction Act and the Uniform Code of Military Justice and thus won’t rehash them here. But putting aside their specific problems what they have in common is that they focus on creating avenues of criminal liability for individual contractors, as opposed to ensuring corporate accountability to ensure long-term compliance with “use of force” policies. According to Cheadle, contract enforcement is a simple vehicle to achieve corporate accountability. Yet, little has been written on the actual terms of the contracts that PMCs hold with the U.S. government and the potential liability they could face for criminal actions that breach specific terms of those contracts. Just like PMC trade groups, Cheadle recognizes that PMCs are a necessary element of our armed forces abroad and that removal of PMCs from their responsibilities is an option the government cannot afford. Yet he believes that at the same time the U.S. government must find a means of punishing PMCs for criminal conduct while not hindering their essential roles in the war effort. His solutions is elegantly simple; especially so, given that he is not proposing a new law; remember that PMC trade groups always say that there are plenty of laws on the books to ensure proper PMC accountability. Cheadle agrees with this view. He thinks the government should resolve this dilemma by holding PMCs liable for breaches of contract under an alternative clause in FAR Part 49, termination for default. FAR 49.402-4(b) permits the performance of a contract to continue in lieu of a termination for default, but only under a third-party contract or subcontract. Termination for default is generally the exercise of the government’s contractual right to completely or partially terminate a contract because of the contractor’s actual or anticipated failure to perform its contractual obligations.” Specifically, the government can terminate a contract for default if the contractor fails to perform any provision of the contract. However, standard termination for default, however, is not a feasible solution to the problem of how best to enforce a violation of the WPPS II contract. PMCs cannot simply be uprooted from their roles abroad and replaced by military. PMCs cannot simply be uprooted from their roles abroad and replaced by military personnel because, to name one reason, there are not enough military personnel to replace them. Thus, part 49 of the FAR to the rescue. It provides several options for the government “in lieu of termination for default. Under one such alternative clause, FAR 49.402-4, the government may, when in its best interest, permit the contractor to continue performance under a revised delivery schedule 8 or continue performance “by means of a subcontract or other business arrangement with an acceptable third party.” This permits a contract to continue, benefiting the government, while effectively punishing the contractor by transferring the work to a third party. How would this work in real life? Think back to the killing of Iraqi civilians by Blackwater contractors in 2007. According to Cheadle the government may, “under FAR 49.402-4(b), let Blackwater’s duties under the WPPS II contract continue upon a finding of termination for default through a subcontract or third-party contract. Discussed below, this could be in the form of requiring Blackwater to hand some of its duties over to one of the other contractors under the WPPS II contract-DynCorp International or Triple Canopy-companies already familiar with the contract and fit to meet its demands.” Considering that PMC trade groups always say that it is free market competition which allows the private sector to produce “cost-effective” high performance solutions. Cheadle agrees, writing that “The key to this system is its focus on competition within the existing contract. The purpose of this competition would be to create incentives to comply with the “use of force” policy. Competition is the heart of the government contract system, the policy being to get the best price and product through competitive procedures.” Thus, trade groups can hardly complain when the laws of supply and demand are used to ensure contract compliance. This would be a great opportunity for trade groups like ISOA and PSC to match their corporate funding with their talking points. Cheadle recognizes that a “potential problem presented by applying FAR 49.402-4(b) is that it may cause the government to hire an entity unfamiliar with the dangers of operating in Iraq and Afghanistan to take over the contract, endangering the lives of the individuals the PMCs were hired to protect. Thus, he proposes that: The government should utilize this clause by establishing a system that requires the contract to continue through one of the two nonbreaching parties already under the WPPS II contract. Creating a system of competition among the parties already under the WPPS II contract is the best option to attain the necessary balance between a policy that ensures the safety of the con tractors and the officials they are hired to protect and a policy that ensures compliance with the “use of force” terms of the contract. This remedy would allow smooth transitions between contractors because all parties involved would already be familiar with the contract and the terrain, and would have the experience to negotiate the dangers inherent in providing security services in Iraq. Essentially, if a contractor screws up by, say, shooting someone it shouldn’t have, the company will pay the price by see its work go to another company working on the same WPPS contract. But perhaps the greatest benefit would be this: The greatest asset of this system would be its ability to achieve the delicate balance between the best protection of U.S. and foreign officials and compliance with the “use of force” policy of the contract, which ensures the safety of Iraqi civilians. All three of the contractors already at work under the WPPS II contract know the territory and know what they have to do to keep their subjects and their own employees safe. They would, over time, learn what steps are necessary to ensure compliance with the “use of force” policy while maintaining maximum levels of safety for their security subjects. No contractor would go so far as to sacrifice safety by not firing when there is a clear and present threat of danger. Competition among the three contractors would force them to find the balance between an effective defensive policy and maximum safety for the officials who are at the heart of the contract. The competition also likely would induce greater oversight of contractor actions within the contracting companies themselves. PMCs would likely monitor each other for potential violations, creating another layer of oversight on top of the Regional Security Officers and the Diplomatic Security High Threat Protection Program Office.

Read the full article →

Starbucks To Raise Prices

January 3, 2012

Are you one of those people who constantly grumbles about $4 lattes? Brace yourself: Starbucks, patient zero of that particular fiduciary epidemic, just announced that it’s raising prices once again. The latest Starbucks price hike primarily affects Northeastern and Southern states, and will see menu prices rise by about one percent overall, reports Reuters. But the increase in prices will not be an even one percent across the board. The cost of a “tall” latte in New York City, for example, will go up by 10 cents, but prices for “grande” lattes will stay where they are. Starbucks attributed the move to a variety of factors , but one of them is surely commodity prices, which remain high. Another factor may be the New Year’s increase in the minimum wage in several states. If some prognosticators are right, though, this latest price hike could be just a taste of trends to come. In October, the Sustainability Director of Starbucks warned that climate change could harm coffee plants’ growing conditions down the line — which could make a $4 the late 21st-century’s equivalent of penny candy.

Read the full article →

Jonathan Weiler: Republican Nonsense on Regulation

December 29, 2011

A persistent GOP line of attack against President Obama is that he’s inflicted an intolerable “regulatory burden” on American businesses. Mitt Romney, for instance, has been telling campaign crowds that the Obama administration has issued four times as much regulation as past presidents. This claim is false. According to Bloomberg news, the Obama administration has issued 613 new federal rules so far in his presidency. During the same period in the presidency of George W. Bush, his administration had issued 643 new rules. Romney has, in fact, repeatedly misrepresented the Obama administration’s regulatory record. As with so many Republican Party talking points these days, his claims about Obama and regulation are not intended to be factual statements. Instead, they’re meant to advance a larger conservative meme: that regulations are necessarily and inherently bad. The standard GOP view of regulations is that they impose a cost on business and “kill” jobs in the process, while delivering no benefit to the economy or society more broadly. Examples to the contrary abound. For example, in the wake of the Deepwater Horizon oil spill, the Obama administration issued new rules on deep sea oil drilling. Those regulations might cost industry $200 million or so. But it’s quite obvious that the problem in this case isn’t “excessive” regulation — it’s that the regulation didn’t come soon enough (a disastrous oversight for which the Obama administration bears some responsibility ). The direct costs alone of the Deepwater Horizon disaster could exceed $16 billion. Had the new rules been in place prior to the disaster, billions of dollars would have been saved and a larger environmental catastrophe could have been avoided. In that vein, among the most far-reaching regulations has been the Clean Air Act, whose estimated cost savings since its passage run into the trillions of dollars. In addition, while Republicans repeatedly decry the job-destroying effects of regulations, most sober-minded economists say that the overall effects of regulations on jobs are minimal. The GOP’s attack on regulation is part of a larger attempt to discredit the idea that government can play a positive role in people’s lives. That attack is itself based on a fantasy — that in the absence of the distorting and freedom-destroying effects of government, human action would yield generally optimal outcomes for society as a whole. Such notions themselves hearken back to Adam Smith’s discussion of an “invisible hand.” Leaving aside repeated misrepresentations of what Smith meant by that phrase, he was no fantasist and endorsed myriad public works and a range of what we would now call government regulations. Smith’s quite sensible views on the matter derive from a simple point, one that most grown-ups acknowledge in their day-to-day lives: Our actions can have adverse consequences for others. Government regulations can, of course, impose burdensome costs. But that’s not the same as arguing that any regulation imposes a cost on individuals or businesses that otherwise would not exist. As the economist Dean Baker explains , if I dump toxic sludge onto your lawn and a law requires me to clean it up, you can argue that the “cost” of the regulation is simply the cost I incur to take care of the problem. There is, however, also a price that you pay for having toxic sludge on your lawn. Regulation, seen in this light, does not create new costs. Instead, it seeks to assign existing costs to the responsible parties by forcing them to clean up their messes, or by preventing those parties from creating the mess in the first place. Blanket condemnations of regulation, of the type that are de rigueur among Republicans these days, refuse to acknowledge this basic truth. Republicans also decry the incredibly lengthy and unwieldy nature of federal rules, running as they do to thousands or tens of thousands of pages in some cases. Kevin Drum has pointed out that this is often not the result of liberals’ insatiable desire to kill more trees. For example, when the so-called Volcker rule was first conceived — the purpose of which was to limit federally insured banks’ ability to engage in speculative investment — it was pretty simple and straightforward. That was before the lobbyists set upon it like shape-shifting sorcerers. The result: a law whose preamble alone was 215 pages with nearly 400 footnotes. Drum notes that, in general, regulators prefer simple, clear rules. Industry, on the other hand, has an incentive to make those rules as unwieldy and exemption-ridden as possible. Simple rules are bad for business, Drum says, because they’re “hard to evade.” Of course, big business interests will publicly lament laws that run to thousands of pages. Privately, though, they’re paying attorneys a lot of money to render those laws more obscure, complex, unmanageable and difficult to enforce than any regulator would ever want. That regulation is fully justifiable when it mitigates the harm that some private actors might otherwise inflict on others ought to be the minimally agreed upon foundation for a larger conversation about the proper limits and potential pitfalls of specific kinds of government regulation. Instead of joining such a conversation, one of our two major parties offers up a fairy tale version of the economy. The simple idea that private interests, left to their own devices, have the potential to hurt others and undermine the public good is denounced as “socialistic” thinking and un-American. Wealthy private interests are heroic job creators that could and would build a nearly perfect society, if only they were left alone to work their job-creating magic. In that world, only the lazy and undeserving would fail to prosper. Such fantasies ought to have been finally discredited by the disastrous role that deregulation played in the 2008 financial crisis. Instead, the anti-regulatory zealots have doubled down on this delusion and spun a particularly inventive — and typically fact-free — tale about how the financial crisis was itself caused by the evils of government regulation (and Barney Frank), a zombie lie that just won’t die. This article originally appeared in the Independent Weekly of North Carolina .

Read the full article →

Analysis: Americans Shedding Debt, Becoming ‘Radically Different Consumers’

December 18, 2011

WASHINGTON (Reuters) – Americans are making progress in working down their heavy debt burden, but are struggling to break out of another funk holding back the economy: their deep pessimism. Some economists point to a big drop in household debt as a sign that American consumers – once considered the driving force of the world economy – are primed to return to more spendthrift ways. But standing in the way of a stronger recovery, and possibly President Barack Obama’s re-election as well, are unprecedented levels of concern that better days may not lie ahead. Research suggests that economic growth will suffer from a sinking feeling among consumers that their incomes will continue to lose ground to inflation. Even though households are digging themselves out of debt, the painful 2007-2009 recession could leave a lasting scar on their willingness to spend. “Given people’s expectations, the outlook going forward does not suggest much upside for consumption,” said Jeff Greenberg, an economist at Nomura in New York. “A lot of people will be radically different consumers.” Polls show record levels of pessimism about future income despite slow improvements in the economy. Indeed, Gallup surveys have found Americans are even gloomier about their finances now than they were during the recession’s darkest days. Americans should be feeling better. They have made big strides whittling down the mountain of debt left after the explosion of the housing bubble and the subsequent recession. Debt payments have already fallen to the smallest fraction of income since 1994. Households spent 11.09 percent of after-tax income servicing their debt in the third quarter. In 2007, that rate hit a record high 14 percent. Many borrowers have been helped by the Federal Reserve’s push to lower interest rates. Others are simply walking away from mortgages. PROTRACTED MALAISE Shaking the painful debt hangover is widely seen as crucial for getting the economy growing faster again. But it might not be enough. Derek Thompson, a salesman at a credit card company in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, recently refinanced his mortgage to lower his monthly payments. But given a sobering outlook for future income, he says he will use the extra money to pay off other debts rather than buy new stuff. Thompson needs to start paying off the $50,000 he borrowed to get a bachelor’s degree in criminal justice, and he plans to switch careers to get into law. At the same time, he fears he will take a pay cut due to a tough job market. “I want to wait until the financial situation straightens out a bit before I make any other changes,” he said. Thompson is far from alone in his unease over the economy. Americans’ median guess of how much their incomes would rise in the coming 12 months fell to 0.2 percent this month, the lowest in records going back to 1978, according to the Thomson Reuters/University of Michigan sentiment survey. That reading cratered in late 2008 after the collapse of U.S. investment bank Lehman Brothers. Views on wage gains never recovered, and now only 8 percent of Americans expect incomes to grow faster than inflation over the next year. Perhaps even more worrisome, views of future inflation-adjusted income have been moving lower since around 2003, a trend that was only exacerbated by the recent recession. That bodes poorly for growth. Research by JPMorgan economist Michael Feroli found inflation-adjusted income expectations might be the best single indicator for predicting future consumption. His crunching of real income expectations implicit in the University of Michigan survey found they correlated better with spending growth than changes in the stock market, wider measures of consumer sentiment or even the actual growth in people’s wages. This is scary not just because pessimism is so rampant, but because top policymakers like Obama and Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke have limited sway over the national mood. “People (need) to really believe that sustained strong growth is coming, which is like solving a problem by presuming its solution,” Feroli said. “It’s hard for the Fed to directly affect households’ psychology regarding their real income expectations.” Other recent research also points to the importance of expectations, suggesting that shifts in the collective mood may have been the driving force behind the ups and downs of the U.S. economy over the last six decades. Working together, economists from the University of British Columbia, City University of Hong Kong and the Dallas Federal Reserve Bank found positive turns in sentiment led to substantial pick-ups in investment and hours worked. The opposite held for a souring mood. It seems hard to imagine a quick turnaround in the current malaise. Feroli suggests that allowing a little extra inflation could prompt people to buy more homes and boost investment, perhaps leading to more growth and optimism. Others propose tax cuts or more government spending to get more money in people’s pockets. Both ideas face big hurdles, with lawmakers currently embracing austerity and central bankers at the Fed divided over how much inflation can be tolerated. Yet the national mood has shifted quickly before. In the early 1980s, after a tumultuous period marked by recession and high inflation, Americans suddenly began to believe in real wage gains as the Fed tamed prices and then-President Ronald Reagan cut taxes and boosted military spending. “It’s amazing how quickly it can turn around,” said Hersh Shefrin, an economist and professor of behavioral finance at California’s Santa Clara University. (Reporting By Jason Lange; Editing by Chizu Nomiyama; and Jan Paschal) Copyright 2011 Thomson Reuters. Click for Restrictions .

Read the full article →

‘Supply Is Down, So Prices Are Up’

December 12, 2011

This article comes to us courtesy of California Watch . By Michael Montgomery A crackdown by federal prosecutors is casting a long shadow over the state’s marijuana industry, but there is one bright spot, at least for some Northern California growers willing to risk prison time: Wholesale prices appear to be on the rise. After slumping precipitously, prices for a pound of high-grade, outdoor-grown marijuana are stabilizing and in some areas are up between 20 and 40 percent, according to interviews with growers, law enforcement agents and analysts. “It’s been a downward thrust since 1996, but this year, prices have been up,” said Kym Kemp, a Humboldt-based blogger who closely follows Northern California’s marijuana scene. “People are saying, ‘Maybe this isn’t our last season,’ ” she said. “I don’t think people are ready to be optimistic, but they’re less depressed.” In recent years, California’s booming medical marijuana industry attracted a rush of new players who harvested increasingly large amounts of pot – for storefront dispensaries and the black market. Some longtime operators responded by also “growing big.” Surging production pushed down prices for some strains to less than $1,000 per pound. This led more growers to illegally ship their marijuana out of state, where they can double or triple their profits. But this year, production levels have dropped, in part because of rainy weather and a “bumper crop of mold,” said medical marijuana grower and activist Charley Custer. “It was a perfect storm,” he said. It wasn’t just the weather. Stepped-up enforcement actions by local and federal law enforcement led some growers to lay low and reduce their plant counts to double digits. “Some growers decided to keep it small this year,” said Dale Gieringer, state director for the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws. With marijuana supplies under pressure, prices responded as they would with any other commodity. Since the fall harvest, Northern California growers have seen prices jump to between $2,000 and $2,500 per pound for “good-quality” marijuana, according to Kemp. Law enforcement agencies say it’s too early to get a clear read on this year’s harvest. “Marijuana remains readily available in California, and we have not noticed a substantial change in prices,” said Casey McEnry of the Drug Enforcement Administration’s San Francisco office. But data collected by local law enforcement and a federally funded drug task force indicate street prices have nearly doubled in some parts of the state. “Supply is down, so prices are up,” said Tommy LaNier, director of the White House-funded National Marijuana Initiative. LaNier credited the shift in prices to new law enforcement tactics, including the use of more informants, undercover agents and wiretaps and an aggressive effort to intercept marijuana being shipped in vehicles and through commercial carriers like FedEx and UPS. He also said recent actions by the state’s four U.S. attorneys have shaken the marijuana industry. “The market is significantly disrupted,” he said. LaNier said creating market disruptions has been a top priority for law enforcement because it could make marijuana less affordable for minors. But law enforcement agencies are not the only groups welcoming the changes. Black market growers say rising prices mean a return to higher profits. “This is a relief, since my margins were getting very thin,” said one Bay Area grower, who asked that his name be withheld because he is operating outside of state medical marijuana laws. Because of the profit margins, he said he had given up trying to sell his product in California. Instead, he’s been delivering it to the East Coast concealed in private vehicles. The grower said he might return to the California market if prices continue to rise. “I’d rather not take the extra risk of shipping out of state,” he said. But Tim Blake, a Mendocino-based medical marijuana grower, activist and impresario, said it is an outrage that illegal growers stand to benefit from the federal crackdown while medical marijuana operators are the targets of raids and forfeitures. “Prices are going up, but the people who will cash in are the men hiding in the mountains,” he said. “If this continues, the people who are trying to follow medical marijuana laws won’t get anything because they’ll be out of business, thanks to the feds.” Michael Montgomery is an investigative reporter for California Watch, a project of the non-profit Center for Investigative Reporting. Find more California Watch stories here .

Read the full article →

Take My Wealth, Please: One Percenters Who Fight For The 99 Percent

December 1, 2011

By Bruce Watson AOL Daily Finance Occupy Wall Street is slowing down a bit as winter sets in, but the conversation it inspired is still gaining momentum. Millions of Americans who once viewed themselves in general terms like “middle class,” “struggling” or “comfortable” now see the world more sharply divided into two groups: the 99 percent and the 1 percent. But even in the middle of the protests, the division isn’t as stark as one might think. From the beginning, some of Occupy Wall Street’s strongest supporters have come from America’s richest families. Who are these wealthy few who have crossed the boundary, and what are they doing to help the other 99 percent? Among the first 1 percent rebels was Robert S. Halper, a former vice chairman of the New York Mercantile Exchange — and an early enabler of Occupy Wall Street. A friend of OWS mastermind Kalle Lasn, Halper was one of the first to hear about the decision to take over Zuccotti Park. When Lasn unveiled his plans, Halper gave him $20,000 to set things in motion. But while Halper was quick to pull out his checkbook, he chose to remain mostly on the outside of the occupation, only visiting occasionally to see what his money had helped ignite. By comparison, some 1 percent rebels have dived in to work more closely with the 99 percent. Afraid and Isolated Critics of the 1 percent tend to paint the wealthy as arrogant and self-centered, convinced that they deserve their wealth, and blind to their own good luck and the societal support that allowed them to prosper. But Chuck Collins, director of the Institute for Policy Studies’ Program on Inequality and the Common Good, suggests that the relationship between rich people and their money isn’t quite so clear-cut. “Sure, some buy into the idea of wealth creation and claim that they are completely responsible for their money,” says Collins, “but most realize that their wealth has to do with the society that we live in.” Once they reach that conclusion, he argues, it often informs their decisions. “Many people in the 1 percent for one reason or another have realized that the economy should not be organized to keep funneling wealth to the top.” For Collins, the relationship between the 1 percent and the rest of the country isn’t theoretical. A great-grandson of Oscar Meyer, he is an heir to the family’s extensive meatpacking fortune. He argues, however, that his wealth doesn’t shield him from economic inequity. “As a parent, do I want my child to grow up in an apartheid society? Do I want to live in Brazil, where I have to surround my family with bodyguards as we take armored cars from one rich enclave to another? That’s kind of where we’ve been heading for the last 30 years. Do this for another 20 years and you’ve got another Sao Paolo.” Karen Pittelman (pictured above, and right, with Elspeth Gilmore), a philanthropist and author of Classified: How to Stop Hiding Your Privilege and Work for Social Change, echoes this sense of exclusion: “Class privilege often comes with a lot of isolation and fear, and that can be passed down through the generations along with an inheritance.” Part of the problem, she argues, lies in upper-class discomfort about the benefits they enjoy. “Being open and honest about how so much is rigged in our favor is a threat to the way things run. That stuff is supposed to stay quiet, behind the scenes. That’s the real reason why people who grow up with class privilege are taught never to talk about money.” The Broader Community Part of the solution, Collins claims, is for rich people to recognize that wealth cannot shelter them indefinitely. “We don’t live on islands. Well–some of us do,” he says with a laugh. “But most of us live in communities where we can see the results of 30 to 40 years of public policy that have increased inequality.” Jessie Spector (right), the program director at Resource Generation, a organizing group for young philanthropists, argues that the best tool for developing a more equitable society is tax reform. “I am focused on taxation as one key tactic for creating economic justice. It’s the best system we have on a scale large enough to create a more equitable society.” The burden, she notes, rests on the rich: “We need to pay our fair share. The wealthy need to pay much more if we hope to maintain opportunities for everyone in our society.” Collins echoes the idea that higher tax rates broadly benefit society. “In the 1950s and 1960s, we taxed ourselves at a high level and used the money to pay for public investments that made our generation’s prosperity possible. Now, however, we’re stripping those investments in order to benefit a very small portion of the populace. Are we leaving anything for the next generation?” In addition to hollowing out the middle class and crucifying the lower class, Collins argues, this sort of thinking is devastating for the upper classes. “We also need to think about the health of the economy. Too much inequality undermines the basis of prosperity.” Helping Others Find a Voice Lobbying for tax reform isn’t the only way that wealthy people can help their communities. Spector has worked with Occupy Wall Street, and has used a large part of her inheritance to help fund small grass-roots organizations: “My priorities have been to give money to work led by the people who are most directly affected by injustice. I work with Poor Magazine, a media group that is organized around economic injustice.” When Karen Pittelman protested at Occupy Wall Street, she carried a sign that poked fun at her own wealth: “Another Trust Fund Baby for the Radical Redistribution of Wealth. She stresses that philanthropy isn’t just about giving away money; it’s also about giving away power. With part of her inheritance, she endowed the Chahara Foundation, which funded grass roots groups in Boston that were run by and for low-income women of color. She quickly learned, however, that the privilege that she was taught to take for granted could get in the way of her own philanthropy. “Part of the thing about being raised with class privilege is that you are always taught that you know best, that you have the solution to everything,” she says. “After the foundation’s first round of giving, it was so clear to me that, had I been making the decisions, I never would have even known about so many of these amazing, small, grassroots groups they were supporting because I wasn’t from those communities. The women making the grant decisions had been working as activists in their communities their whole lives, so they knew what was going on in a way I never would.” Giving away power not only taught Pittelman about her own expectations, but also about her ability to change the world. Looking back, she says: “When you have a lot of resources and are willing to put them behind radical causes, it can make some people nervous.”

Read the full article →

Are Windows Tablets Coming Too Late?

November 29, 2011

The research group Forrester has a new study out in which it shows a shrinking appetite for Windows 8 tablets, the yet-to-be-released devices running the touch-friendly new Windows that is set for a 2012 launch . In a blog post , JP Gownder of Forrester says that Windows 8 tablets are going to be “very late to the party”; he blames a slow-moving Microsoft for the dip in consumer interest. Gownder reports that, while 46 percent of U.S. consumers expressed an interest in an upcoming Windows 8 tablet back in quarter one of 2011, that number fell to 21 percent in quarter three of 2011. From his blog post , titled “Microsoft’s Shrinking Window For Tablets: Its Fifth-Mover Product Strategy Is Late”: Product strategists often look to be “fast followers” in their product markets. Perhaps the most famous example is the original browser war of the 1990s: Microsoft’s fast-following Internet Explorer drove incumbent Netscape out of the market altogether. Question: What matters more — being a “fast follower,” or being a good follower? The steady decline of Internet Explorer , from about 91 percent in 2004 to 54 percent in 2011 , as “slower” followers like Firefox and Google Chrome rose, would suggest that being a fast follower is not really important over time, at least in the browser space. Also, Internet Explorer came bundled with Windows PCs ( later deemed to be an illegal monopolistic advantage ), so that doesn’t really seem like valid proof of the “fast-follower” thesis. Gownder also writes, For tablets, though, Windows really isn’t a fast follower. Rather it’s (at best) a fifth-mover after iPad, Android tablets like the Samsung Galaxy Tab, HP’s now-defunct webOS tablet, and the BlackBerry PlayBook tablet. While Windows’ product strategists can learn from these products, other players have come a long way in executing and refining their products — Apple, Samsung, and others have already launched second-generation products and will likely be into their third generation by the time Windows 8 launches. Gownder lists the iPad, and then three kinds of tablets that have gotten trounced by the iPad, as initial movers in the tablet space, products that “beat” Windows 8 tablets. Well, the HP Touchpad was discontinued by HP in recent months (so much for the virtues of being a third-follower), and the BlackBerry PlayBook has long been rumored to be nearly-dead . Android tablets (second-followers) that are not the Kindle Fire and Nook Tablet are also failing in the marketplace . Would Microsoft really want to be in the position of any of the non-iPad tablets that Gownder lists as having a “mover” advantage over them? Meanwhile, newer competitors like Amazon (Kindle Fire) and Barnes & Noble (Nook Tablet) are reshaping consumer expectations in the market, driving down price points (and concomitant price expectations), and redefining what a tablet is. Here is the real wisdom of the Forrester analysis: Any drop in consumer desire for a Windows 8 tablet has less to do with its perceived “lateness” and more to do with a shifting marketplace that may even affect demand for the mighty $500 iPad . This was the primary finding of a survey conducted by Boston Consulting Group (BCG) in October — consumers decide on tablets based on a set of preferences, with tablet ease-of-use, available applications and price points informing their buying decisions. Windows 8 tablets really appeal to consumers, the BCG report found , because the idea of a Windows interface on a tablet is appealing to those who are familiar with Microsoft products. It’s likely this still holds true. By releasing its Windows 8-powered tablets late, Microsoft will have to overcome three generations of iPads and two of the Kindle Fire (which, let’s remember, has probably sold many millions on its own “late-moving” first attempt). Breaking into the tablet market is not impossible if you’ve made a desired device, as Amazon has proven. To dismiss the Windows 8 tablet before anyone outside of a bunch of developers have seen one seems premature, no matter what the survey says. Let’s wait for a product, price and availability before we write off Windows 8 as Windows Too Late.

Read the full article →

Tax Evasion Crackdown Could Mean Big Losses For Swiss Banks

November 29, 2011

GENEVA — A study by consultancy firm Booz & Co. claims Swiss banks stand to lose 1.1 billion Swiss francs ($1.2 billion) in annual revenue because of new deals to crack down on tax evasion. The Booz study says clients will likely withdraw some 47 billion francs ($51 billion) from Switzerland’s financial sector after Bern signed new tax agreements with Germany and Britain. The report released Tuesday predicts that Switzerland’s private banking industry will shrink but benefit from the stability afforded by the two agreements. The Swiss government has been eager to improve its cooperation with other countries to avoid being blacklisted as a haven for tax cheats. Last year Switzerland’s financial sector managed foreign assets totaling 2.05 trillion francs ($2.2 trillion).

Read the full article →

Facebook Settles With The FTC, Admits To Privacy ‘Mistakes’

November 29, 2011

This post has been updated. On Tuesday, Facebook reached a settlement agreement with the Federal Trade Commission regarding the social network’s policy on changing privacy controls and informing users of those changes. Under the terms of the settlement Facebook must obtain approval from users before making changes to the way their personal data is shared on the network. For the next 20 years, Facebook must also submit to scheduled checkups by “independent, third-party auditors” to ensure that the company’s privacy policies and practices do not violate users’ rights. “Facebook is obligated to keep the promises about privacy that it makes to its hundreds of millions of users,” said FTC Chairman Jon Leibowitz, according to a release published by the agency . “Facebook’s innovation does not have to come at the expense of consumer privacy. The FTC action will ensure it will not.” Facebook Co-founder and CEO Mark Zuckerberg also published a lengthy post on the Facebook Blog regarding the social network’s future privacy efforts and its settlement with the FTC. “I’m the first to admit that we’ve made a bunch of mistakes,” Zuckerberg wrote . These announcements confirm rumors earlier this month that Facebook and the FTC were reaching an agreement over the site’s controversial policies regarding the protection of users’ data. The FTC’s release lists seven complaints against Facebook’s allegedly deceptive privacy practices, specifically that it told users some of their personal information would be kept private, but that the site later allowed that information to become accessible. The agency’s complete list of allegations are as follows: In December 2009, Facebook changed its website so certain information that users may have designated as private – such as their Friends List – was made public. They didn’t warn users that this change was coming, or get their approval in advance. Facebook represented that third-party apps that users’ installed would have access only to user information that they needed to operate. In fact, the apps could access nearly all of users’ personal data – data the apps didn’t need. Facebook told users they could restrict sharing of data to limited audiences – for example with “Friends Only.” In fact, selecting “Friends Only” did not prevent their information from being shared with third-party applications their friends used. Facebook had a “Verified Apps” program & claimed it certified the security of participating apps. It didn’t. Facebook promised users that it would not share their personal information with advertisers. It did. Facebook claimed that when users deactivated or deleted their accounts, their photos and videos would be inaccessible. But Facebook allowed access to the content, even after users had deactivated or deleted their accounts. Facebook claimed that it complied with the U.S.- EU Safe Harbor Framework that governs data transfer between the U.S. and the European Union. It didn’t. Under the proposed agreement, Facebook must adopt a policy of allowing users to opt-in whenever changes are made to the site’s privacy policy and sharing options. If a user deletes his or her account, Facebook must block other users from accessing data from the deleted account after 30 days. For the next 20 years, Facebook’s privacy policy will be assessed every two years to ensure that the company has made its privacy policies clear to its users and that it hasn’t violated the terms of its agreement with the FTC. Mark Zuckerberg wrote in his blog post that Facebook had recently taken many steps recently to give users more control over what they share on the network. However, he admitted that the company could do more to guarantee data security to its users. Zuckerberg also wrote that the company has added two new Chief Privacy Officer positions. Erin Egan will become Facebook’s executive in charge of policy, and Michael Richter will oversee products. According to AllThingsD , “Facebook’s punishment is in line with what its competitors Twitter and Google have already agreed to: Clearer privacy policies that are audited every two years for the next 20 years.” Take a look at a roundup of reactions to the announcement that Facebook would cooperate with the FTC regarding users’ privacy.

Read the full article →

Banks May Have Illegally Foreclosed On Nearly 5,000 Military Members

November 29, 2011

Even those people putting their lives on the line for their country may not be safe from the American foreclosure crisis. Ten lenders are reviewing close to 5,000 foreclosures of homes belonging to active-duty service members in an attempt to discover if they were carried out improperly, according to data from the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, cited by the Financial Times . The OCC’s report is based on projections prepared by the lenders and and their consultants. Bank of America said it is reviewing 2,400 foreclosures of homes belonging to active-duty service members and Wells Fargo said it’s looking at nearly 900 cases. Citigroup is reviewing 700 foreclosures, the bank said. The Servicemembers Civil Relief act aims to protect active-duty members of the military from financial difficulty, including through measures that restrict foreclosures on properties owned by active-duty military members. Still, as the OCC data indicates, thousands of active-duty members of the armed forces have lost their homes while fighting abroad. Bank of America and Morgan Stanley reached deals with the Justice Department earlier this year, agreeing to pay more than $20 million to settle claims that they foreclosed on more than 175 active-duty service members without court orders. They’re not the only ones. JPMorgan Chase also admitted to illegally foreclosing on the families of 27 active-duty military members earlier this year and has very publicly attempted to give the families back their homes or compensate them for damages if the house was sold. The bank also agreed to pay $27 million in cash to about 6,000 active-duty service members who were overcharged on their mortgages, Bloomberg reports. Illegal foreclosures have affected service members like U.S. Army Sgt. James Hurley who lost his house to foreclosure while he was serving in Iraq. Tim Collette said in June that he had been negotiating with JPMorgan Chase since 2008 to save his house from foreclosure while his son was serving in Iraq. Though illegal foreclosures may be some of the most egregious examples of lenders mistreating service members, banks have wronged members of the military in other ways. An October lawsuit claims that 13 banks and mortgage companies charged hidden and illegal fees from veterans trying to refinance their homes.

Read the full article →

$2.1 Million For Alternative Energy Manufacturing

November 28, 2011

Southeast Michigan is one of 20 regions from around the country picked by the federal government for economic growth grant money, Gov. Rick Snyder and an Obama administration official announced Monday. The federal Jobs and Innovation Accelerator Challenge selected Southeast Michigan from among 146 applications for its potential in alternative energy manufacturing.

Read the full article →

Americans Tolerate Price Hikes On Everyday Products

November 26, 2011

NEW YORK — The way Americans are chomping Big Macs, lacing up pricey sneakers and gulping peppermint mochas in this economy, you’d think they’re taking advantage of big holiday discounts. The truth is they’re paying more. McDonald’s, Nike, Starbucks and other companies initially worried that customers would run the other way when they started raising prices to offset their higher costs for ingredients, fuel and packaging. But so far, cash-strapped Americans largely have swallowed the price spikes. And they’re continuing to do so during this holiday shopping season. On a recent weekday, five full floors of shoppers in a Nike store in New York didn’t seem to mind paying more for their favorite kicks, including the almost $200 sneakers named for NBA star LeBron James. At a McDonald’s across town, people munched on Big Macs and fries that cost a dime or two more than last year. Customers also piled into a Starbucks down the street, where cappuccinos and many other specialty drinks now top $5. Timothy and Katrin Sullivan, a San Diego couple, estimate that together they spend about $100 a month on skinny caramel macchiatos and pumpkin spice lattes at Starbucks, where prices on some drinks have risen in some regions this year. As parents of five children, they worry about the economy and have cut back on travel and ball games, but so far their morning cup of joe has survived the chopping block despite the rising price. “It’s cheaper than therapy,” says Katrin Sullivan, 39. The prices Americans pay for food, travel and other things have steadily risen this year, according to government data. Prices went up 3.5 percent in October compared with the same month a year ago. At the same time, every month for the past year except one, spending grew 2 percent or more compared with the same month a year ago. That’s given retailers some cautious optimism as they try to gauge just how much more consumers are willing to pay. Pete Bensen, McDonald’s chief financial officer told analysts during the company’s earnings call that the question boils down to this: “Is the consumer in a place that we’re comfortable we can continue to add price increases?” Companies of all stripes have been asking that question a lot. In the past year, they’ve been paying more for materials like beef, corn and fuel that they use to make, package and transport their goods. A combination of poor crop yields in some parts of the world, unrest in the Middle East and greater demand from countries like Brazil and China have sent those costs up. Many costs have come down after spiking in the spring. A pound of coffee, for example, is trading at about $2.30, down from $3 in the spring. But that’s up from $2 a year ago. As a result, Starbucks Corp. this year raised the price of the packaged coffee in its stores by 17 percent. The company declines to say whether prices on brewed drinks have risen or fallen overall in the past year, since those price decisions vary by region. But generally, the Seattle chain says the prices of specialty drinks like lattes and macchiatos are more likely to have risen this year than simpler drinks. The price of a 16-ounce grande cappuccino at Starbucks costs about $4.25, up about 23 percent from $3.45 a year ago, research firm Technomic estimates. Meanwhile, a bagel went up from $1 a year ago to $1.25. That hasn’t stopped Starbucks customers from getting their coffee fix, though. Store traffic rose 6 percent in the most recent fiscal year, which ended in October. Revenue at stores open at least a year – an indicator of a retailer’s health – rose 8 percent. “We think we are in a very good spot right now,” Jeff Hansberry, who runs Starbucks’ consumer products division, said in a call with analysts this month. At Nike Inc., sales rose almost 18 percent in the three-month period through August, even though it raised prices on certain styles this year. Nike hasn’t detailed the price increases, but according to research firm SportsOneSource Group, the suggested price of a pair of this year’s version of LeBron James’ sneakers is about $170, up from about $160 last year. Nike said it expects to raise prices more broadly in the spring. “We have not seen any big price resistance at all,” Charles Denson, president of the Nike Brand, said in a call with analysts. Likewise, traffic and sales grew after McDonald’s raised prices an average of 1 percent in March and another 1.4 percent in May. In the third quarter, guest count increased 2.6 percent. Revenue at stores open at least a year rose 5 percent. (The revenue figure is a snapshot of money spent on food at both company-owned and franchised restaurants. It does not reflect corporate revenue.) McDonald’s won’t give details on which items it raised prices on, but Technomic estimates that a Big Mac costs an average of $3.39, up from $3.19 a year ago. A large order of fries is about $1.89, up from $1.79. And the company signaled that there may be more increases to come. “We will continue to evaluate additional price increases,” said Bensen, McDonald’s CFO, during a call last month. “As we look into 2012, we expect commodity cost increases in the U.S. to be similar to this year’s.” Even if the costs for some raw materials decline, companies are still expected to continue to raise prices during this holiday shopping season. That’s because costs for materials are uncertain, so companies will try to raise prices whenever they think customers will tolerate them. Still, they have to tread lightly or risk losing customers. To be sure, families have trimmed their budgets as the economy plummets. But Americans continue to spend for myriad reasons, even though prices have risen on everything from Coca-Cola soda to Huggies diapers to Ben & Jerry’s ice cream. Some are stomaching the higher prices only on products they need. Others who’ve cut back on bigger frills are willing to splurge on brands they trust or things they see as small indulgences. Still others are apathetic to the increases because “everybody’s doing it.” The weak economy has forced Kenya Leach, a New York actress, to cut back on eating out and trips to the movies and to reconsider her plans to return to school for an anthropology degree. Still, she keeps buying beauty products from Origins, which sells $35 moisturizer and $25 face wash, even though she’s noticed those prices edge up by about a dollar per product, by her calculations. Estee Lauder, the high-end cosmetics company that owns Origins, did not detail its price increases. But CEO Fabrizio Freda said recently during an analyst call that customers have been “resilient” as the company has raised prices and rolled out more expensive products. Leach, for one, figures it’s OK to spend a little more on Origins products because she is cutting out so many other things. “Treating yourself sends off those happy pheromones,” says Leach, 25. “When I get really crabby and upset, I’ll buy a new lipstick and I’ll feel 10 times better.”

Read the full article →

Nathalie Rothschild: On ‘Buy Nothing Day,’ It’s the Occupiers vs. the Masses

November 25, 2011

On Black Friday, the true colors of the Occupy Wall Street movement really shone through. Premised on the idea that it speaks on behalf of 99 percent of Americans, the Occupy movement is in fact deeply contemptuous of the masses. In no way was this made clearer than through the alignment of the Buy Nothing Day campaign and the Occupy movement. Part of the Occupy X-Mas initiative, which will last throughout the holiday season, Buy Nothing Day kicked off the day after Thanksgiving on so-called Black Friday. This is when vast numbers of Americans go on shopping sprees with hopes of laying their hands on cut-price flat-screen TVs, sneakers and other goods that are on their families’ Christmas wish lists. Many get in line hours before the shops open, some even set up tents and camp in front of stores to get in early. The Occupiers are apparently horrified at the prospect of seeing malls and high-street shops filled with the bargain-hunting masses, or ‘the 99%’ as the Occupiers call the American people, when they need to align great numbers to their cause in order to give it an air of legitimacy and popularity. But of course Occupy Wall Street never spoke for 99 percent of Americans. This was always a fantasy figure that lent itself well to sloganeering and to presenting a black-and-white view of the world, according to which the powerless masses struggling to get by are on one side, and the fat cat CEOs and reckless bankers are on the other. In this Star Wars -like narrative, the Occupiers serve as the heroes who will purportedly save the masses from their downfall by enlightening them and campaigning on their behalf. The message that the Occupiers want to send through their anti-consumption campaign is that Americans have been brainwashed by corporations, that they have been induced to blind over-consumption and unthinking acceptance of the messages put out by ‘the 1%’. As one Occupy sympathizer recently put it on the movement’s website: ‘The working class in this country has been brainwashed by MSM, Fox News, and the right-wing propaganda machine… We need to de-programme people against the brainwashing they’ve experienced.’ This is the Occupier’s Burden, a kind of re-vamped version of the civilising mission described by Rudyard Kipling: to ‘de-program’ Americans and, in the meantime, render them voiceless and clueless so that the apparently enlightened Occupiers can justify stepping in to define their interests for them and to speak on their behalf. The message of Buy Nothing Day follows in this vein. Initiated by Adbusters , every anti-consumption hipster’s must-have mag, the campaign is essentially promulgation for mass austerity — a point well-made on the American Situation blog — and it is an elaborate way of telling people they are stupid, irresponsible, greedy and shallow. For this year’s Black Friday, Adbusters promised ‘flash mobs, consumer fasts, mall sit-ins, community events, credit card-ups, whirly-marts and jams, jams, jams!’ It was Adbusters that originally called for the occupation of Wall Street back in September and designed the Occupy movement’s stylish posters and other propaganda. In a message posted on OWS’ website in the run-up to Black Friday, Adbusters says: You’ve been sleeping on the streets for two months pleading peacefully for a new spirit in economics. And just as your camps are raided, your eyes pepper sprayed and your head’s knocked in, another group of people are preparing to camp-out. Only these people aren’t here to support Occupy Wall Street, they’re here to secure their spot in line for a Black Friday bargain at Super Target and Macy’s. There you have it. On the one side are the Occupiers, ready to deploy every thinkable kind of shenanigan to bring the message home to those on the other side — i.e. vast numbers of ordinary Americans — that they are ‘rabid consumers’ hooked on ‘conspicuous consumption,’ that they are acting like zombies by pigging out and destroying the planet with their addiction to cheap electronics and videogames. A video ad for the 2007 Buy Nothing Day shows a globe in which a big, fat, lip-licking, burping pig sticks out of North America. A voice-over informs viewers that ‘we are the most voracious consumers in the world — a world that could die because of the way we North Americans live.’ In short, Adbusters and their fellow Occupiers see Americans — or, in their own lingo, ‘the 99%’ — as gluttonous, obese pigs. What a joyful holiday message.

Read the full article →

Christmas Tree Farmers Struggle After Historic Drought

November 25, 2011

NEW CANEY, Texas — Dry, brown grass crunches underfoot as David Barfield walks through his 45-acre Christmas tree farm pointing at evergreens covered with brittle, rust-colored needles. “Dead tree, dead tree, dead tree,” he says, shaking his head at dry timber he hoped would be chopped down by parents with excited children. Instead, Mother Nature delivered the Grinch in the form of a historic drought that has killed thousands of trees across Texas and Oklahoma. Some died of thirst. Others were destroyed by wildfires, whose breadth and intensity were magnified when wind swept the flames across parched landscape. Most farmers plan to import trees from North Carolina to supplement any they have left, said Marshall Cathey, president of the Texas Christmas Tree Growers Association. They say they aren’t planning to raise prices because consumers are reluctant to pay more than $40 or $50 for a Christmas tree, especially in the poor economy. But families hoping for a homegrown tree to cut down will have a harder time finding one, and dozens of farmers are struggling. Possibly most painful for these growers are the deaths of the youngest saplings, which guarantee the drought’s effect will be felt for years to come. “It’s depressing, it really is,” said Barfield, 53. “This was going to be our retirement.” He and his wife, Karen, 49, bought the farm about six years ago with dreams of retiring from Texas’ oil fields and spending their final years peddling the Christmas spirit with fresh-cut trees, marshmallow roasts and hayrides in a red-and-white sleigh. They planted 20 acres of evergreen trees. Now, barely two years after Karen Barfield retired to work the farm, she has returned full-time to her job selling explosion-proof enclosures to the oil industry. David Barfield has increased his hours doing part-time electronic work. Instead of selling some 400 homegrown trees as they do in a good year, they will be lucky to sell 100 – nearly all Frasier firs brought in from North Carolina. And they’re not certain that will be enough to cover their property taxes. Barfield says he can only charge $50 for a North Carolina fir – just $10 more than he pays for them. “Eight (trees) died within the last week,” Barfield said, continuing his walk through his farm in New Caney. “These were all green a week ago. The drought has been hurting us real bad.” But at least he and his wife have other income. Others have not fared as well. “We lost probably 90 percent of our trees,” said Jean Raisey, 79, who’s run a 10-acre Christmas tree farm in Purcell, Okla., with her husband since 1985. The other 10 percent are dying now, she said. “We’ve had to hire a contractor and pull all the dead and all the live trees,” she said. “And we’re out of business.” Cathey, who owns the 50-acre Elves Farm in Denison, Texas, a town about 75 miles north of Dallas, said he has spoken to many of Texas’ 120 Christmas tree farmers in recent months. Long stretches of triple-degree heat, he said, harmed the trees as much as the lack of rain. And the drought has been bad. In Texas, less than 11 inches of rain fell this year compared to an annual average of almost 24 inches. In Oklahoma, there has been about 18.7 inches of rain this year compared to a long-term average of 30 inches. All trees have been hard-hit by the lack of rain. “There’s hundreds of thousands of trees dying,” said Travis Miller, a drought expert at Texas A&M University. “We’re looking at a … one-in-a-500-year kind of drought, and so it’s weeding out the ones that can’t survive this kind of extreme conditions,” he added. For evergreens, which usually prefer wetter, more temperate climates, the struggle may be greater than for drought-resistant plants, such as the juniper brush, although it too is dying in Texas this year. Farmers who planted evergreens native to Afghanistan – and accustomed to a desert climate – have had greater success than those who planted trees from the northeast United States. Those who irrigated also are having more modest success, although that costs – about $1,200 a month on a midsized farm. Jan Webb, owner of the Double Shovel Christmas Tree Farm in West Texas – one of the driest areas of the state – said her Afghans have done well. Of the 400 she planted last year, only about 50 died. On the other hand, none of the 400 Leyland Cypress she planted survived. It takes three to five years to grow an evergreen to a marketable size. Webb planted her first tree about three years ago and was hoping to open for the first time next Christmas, but with the drought, it will be at least two years before she has a homegrown tree to sell. “We can’t sell what’s from our farm right now because they’re too small,” she said. Yet the farmers are determined children will be able to see trees cut for Christmas – even if they’re North Carolina firs liberally placed in Texas soil. There will be hayrides and picnics. Christmas carols will ring out and colorful lights will cover the bare branches. Bah humbug to the drought, they say. ___ Ramit Plushnick-Masti can be followed on Twitter at https://twitter.com/RamitMastiAP

Read the full article →

Jesse Kornbluth: The Police Riot at Berkeley: If They’ll Beat a Poet Laureate, Will They Kill a Student?

November 13, 2011

The year was 1967. Body bags were coming back from Vietnam at the rate of 1,000 or more a month. I had skipped my freshman year and finished my honors thesis in my third year, but I stuck around at Harvard for the simple reason that I didn’t want to die in Vietnam or grow old in Canada. To fill the time in what would have been my senior year, I got a book contract. The book was Notes from the New Underground , an anthology of the “underground” press. To gather the articles, I went to California for what I thought would be a week. Los Angeles took, as expected, two days. Then I flew up to Berkeley, where I quickly found a lot more to read. I also found a girlfriend who went by the name of Blue Cheer, and great music at cheap prices — like Jefferson Airplane and two other bands for $3. I called my roommate and told him I wasn’t planning to be in Cambridge any time soon. “If you don’t get on the next plane, you may never come back,” he said, and because he was from California and knew a bit about the pleasures of Berkeley, I returned to college and my book project and the writing that became my life. I’m not a child. I’ve always thought of Berkeley as sunny and friendly, crunchy and stoned, but I also remember it as the site of one of the greatest political speeches I have ever heard. Mario Savio. Sproul Hall. 1964. The conclusion: There is a time when the operation of the machine becomes so odious, makes you so sick at heart, that you can’t take part; you can’t even passively take part, and you’ve got to put your bodies upon the gears and upon the wheels, upon the levers, upon all the apparatus, and you’ve got to make it stop. And you’ve got to indicate to the people who run it, to the people who own it, that unless you’re free, the machine will be prevented from working at all…. The video is even stronger. It’s only a minute. Do watch: I thought of Mario Savio when I read the first accounts of the rout of “Occupy” protestors last week in Berkeley and watched Stephen Colbert’s brilliant takedown of the Berkeley police: The Colbert Report Mon – Thurs 11:30pm / 10:30c Occupy U.C. Berkeley www.colbertnation.com Colbert Report Full Episodes Political Humor & Satire Blog Video Archive Then I started getting emails from Berkeley: This past week at UC Berkeley, several thousand students, faculty, and employees of the university came together to protest a proposed 81% tuition hike, increased privatization of the UC system, the troubling conflicts of interest demonstrated by Board of Regents members’ private business interests and their responsibilities to advocate on behalf of the UC community with the State government. While, for example, the governing body of the UC Regents (publicly appointed officials of the State of California) and campus administration have decided that the burden of making up losses in the budget crisis should fall heavily on students through rapidly rising tuition (the current figure is already triple what it was ten years ago) and on members of faculty and staff who’ve received reductions in pay and increased workloads — or have been laid off entirely — the current Regents have invested at least $1.5 billion of the UC’s money in projects in which many of them personally hold significant stakes and, of course, also authorized $3 million in bonuses to top administrators last year alone. These are some of the reasons why so many people (myself included) gathered together on Wednesday to stand in peaceful protest in front of Sproul Hall. In addition to organizing numerous teach-ins, a rally, march and campus-wide walkout, students also hoped to set up a two-day encampment in the spirit of the other Occupy movements around the country to create a public forum for discussion and education about the current financial situation of the university and the condition of public education in the country today. All day, the crowd was gathered in explicitly peaceful assembly to petition our government for a redress of grievances. As the university first responded by the early afternoon not with administrators to enter into dialogue, but with hundreds of riot police, some students even took the time to recite the first amendment to police and protesters alike. Whether or not you agree with the reasons for the protests, however, I would hope that you would all at least share my horror at what followed. As hundreds of students linked arms to form a human chain around the one tent they had (the few others they had tried to set up were ripped down and confiscated by the police with no warning earlier in the day), riot police began beating them mercilessly without warning or provocation. Some of you may have seen the following clips. Here, you can see the police suddenly start to attack the protesters without cause. The young man in the front that they keep beating even after he’s unable to get up is a first-year graduate student in my department named Josh Anderson. He was the first of a number of students that had to be taken to the hospital that day. As you can see from the video, neither he, nor any of the other students being beaten with batons strike back at the police with violence. Instead, you can see him, barely able to stand, gingerly raise a peace sign after being repeatedly struck on the head, neck, ribs, and legs. In the following video, the first woman (in pink) that the police drag out of the crowd by her hair is Professor Celeste Langan, a beloved professor of British Romanticism and media studies in my department and director of the UC Townsend Center of the Humanities. As she places herself in front of students, the police approach her with batons. She repeatedly told the police not to beat her but arrest her instead. As you can see here, they respond by dragging her out by force and throw her to the ground. When the police violence occurred again later that night, they broke the ribs of another English professor, poet Geoffrey O’Brien. When the police wouldn’t stop beating him even after he too had fallen to the ground, a good friend and fellow graduate student, Ben Cullen, rushed in and demanded that they stop. The police, in turn, rained multiple blows on him, bruising his ribs as well. And just in case it’s not clear yet that the violence was not only against ‘some kids looking to make a fuss,’ the police also thought it necessary jab 70-year-old former Poet Laureate and Pulitzer Prize winner Robert Hass several times in the stomach with a baton as well. Many of us have knee-jerk reactions to cops beating citizens. Mine comes from George Orwell, the subject of my honors thesis. He wrote something like this: When I see a policeman with a club beating a man on the ground, I don’t have to ask whose side I’m on. But with the exception of the great Colbert, you will look in vain for an intelligent conversation about any of this on television. Instead, on a daily basis, Very Smart People tell the likes of Joe Scarborough that it is “class warfare” when “the left” calls for the rich to pay taxes at the rate they did in 1999. Oddly, they never call it class warfare when they discuss proposed Social Security and Medicare cuts — that’s “reform.” I’m not taking sides here; I’m just noting, as Orwell and others have, the power of a simple change in language. That change is now coming to the “Occupy” movement. Polls show a majority of Americans agree with the protestors: “35 percent had a favorable impression of the protest movement…. Only 16 percent could say the same for Wall Street and large corporations.” But the words you are starting to hear to describe the Occupiers are ones I came to hear often when the 1967 “Summer of Love” ended and the body bags from Vietnam started to top 1,500 a month: filthy, violent, promiscuous, etc. As I was following a trail of links about police violence in Berkeley, I happened upon a video showing how, in May, police in Barcelona dealt with students protesting the Spanish government’s proposed “austerity” measures. On a message board that accompanied this video, someone proposed a definition of “class warfare” you won’t hear on television: “The rich are now rich enough to pay half the population to kill the other half of the population.” Sickening, that — and, I fear, prophetic. When some student or “Occupy” protester dies from a police beating — and you know that’s coming — no doubt we will hear some cheers.

Read the full article →

Poverty Rates Swelled In Almost All U.S. States, Cities In 2010

October 20, 2011

The ranks of the poor rose in almost all U.S. states and cities in 2010, despite the end of the longest and deepest economic downturn since the Great Depression the year before, U.S. Census data released on Thursday showed. Mississippi and New Mexico had the highest poverty rates, with more than one out of every five people in each state living in poverty. Mississippi’s poverty rate led, at 22.4 percent, followed by New Mexico at 20.4 percent. New Hampshire had the lowest poverty rate, at 8.3 percent, making it the only state with a poverty rate below 10 percent. Twelve states had poverty rates above 17 percent, up from five in 2009, while poverty rates in 10 metropolitan areas topped 18 percent, the data showed. “We saw the recession hit and unemployment increase, but we haven’t seen a dramatic drop in unemployment,” said Elizabeth Kneebone, a senior research associate focusing on metropolitan issues at the Brookings Institution. “Because we’re still in this weak recovery, we could see these numbers get worse before they get better,” she added. The U.S. recession that began in 2007 took a steep toll across the country, sparing only a few places from rising joblessness and crashing incomes. More than a year after the recession officially ended in 2009, the U.S. unemployment rate remains above 9 percent; the poverty rate rose to 15.3 percent in 2010 from 14.3 percent in 2009. “No state had a statistically significant decline in either the number of people in poverty or the poverty rate between 2009 and 2010.” the Census reported. Kneebone, of the Brookings Institution, noted that many of the big increases in the poverty rate in the first year of the recession were centered in the inner-mountain west and the Sunbelt. “As the recession deepened and spread to other industries, other regions of the country also saw their numbers increase,” she said, noting that areas reliant on manufacturing had not fully recovered from a downturn earlier in the decade when the recession struck. The depth of poverty levels increased in 2010, with 6.8 percent of people having incomes that were no more than half of the federal government’s official poverty threshold. That was up from 6.3 percent in 2009. Poverty ran deepest in Washington, D.C., where one in 10 people had incomes less than 50 percent the threshold. The Census also looked at the 366 metropolitan areas that account for more than 80 percent of the U.S. population. The Texas region defined by the cities of McAllen, Edinburg and Mission had the highest poverty rate in the country — 33.4 percent. It was followed the Fresno, California, area at 26.8 percent. Poverty rates topped 18 percent in metropolitan areas centered around El Paso, Texas; the cities of Bakersfield, Modesto and Stockton in California; Augusta, Georgia; Memphis, Tennessee; and both Durham and Greensboro in North Carolina as economic problems spread from core urban areas to the suburbs over the decade. “Many communities are facing this challenge in a magnitude they’ve never had to deal with before,” said Kneebone, who said there are now 2.7 million more people in suburbs than cities. Despite the deep poverty levels in the District of Columbia, the nation’s capital, the Washington, D.C., metropolitan area had the lowest poverty rate in the nation, at 8.4 percent, due to its wealthier suburbs. Honolulu had the second lowest, 9.1 percent. The numbers of people collecting food stamps and relying on Medicaid, the government healthcare program for the poor, skyrocketed in recent years. The Census also found that in 2010 more people collected other forms of public assistance than in 2009. In 2010, 3.3 million people received public assistance at some time in the year, an increase of 300,000 from 2009. Among U.S. households, about 2.9 percent received public assistance in 2010, up from 2.7 percent in 2009. The states with the highest public assistance participation included Alaska, Maine, Vermont and Washington. The states with the lowest rates were Louisiana, Alabama and Wyoming. Although Alaska and Maryland had poverty rates of 9.9 percent in 2010, the margins of error for those states were greater than 0.3 percent. (Editing by Leslie Adler) Copyright 2011 Thomson Reuters. Click for Restrictions .

Read the full article →

Seriously Delinquent Mortgages Again On The Rise

September 29, 2011

WASHINGTON – Borrowers are making their mortgage payments on time more frequently compared to a year ago, but delinquency rates remain elevated as government efforts to help homeowners fail to keep pace with job losses that push more homeowners toward foreclosure. At the end of the second quarter of this year, 88.0 percent of U.S. mortgages were current, a slight deterioration from 88.6 percent in the previous quarter but an improvement from 87.3 percent a year ago, according to a report from the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency. The second quarter reading marks an improvement from the percentage of loans that were current and performing by the end the 2007-09 financial crisis, according to the OCC. The percentage of current loans fell for seven consecutive quarters leading up to the end of 2009, when 86.4 percent were current at that time. Seriously delinquent mortgages that are 60 days or more past due rose to 4.9 percent in the quarter through June 30 from 4.8 percent the previous period, following five quarters of improvement. Seriously delinquent loans were down from 6.1 percent a year earlier. Bruce Krueger, a mortgage official at the OCC, said seasonal factors may have been the reason for the mortgage delinquencies picking up from the first quarter and might not be directly related to weakness in the economy. He said delinquencies are often low in the first three months of the year and show a pattern of inching up by about 0.2 percent to 0.5 percent by the end of the second quarter. “We’re right in line with what we normally see as the increases in the first and second quarters,” Krueger said. He cautioned that the OCC is paying close attention to the pick-up as the year proceeds to gauge if there are economic factors impacting delinquencies, such as high unemployment. The number of borrowers involved in foreclosure proceedings increased by 0.9 percent during the quarter. However, first-time foreclosure filings on the loans decreased 8.0 percent from the first quarter to 287,145, the report said. Regulators caution foreclosures remain high by historical standards. Loans are being modified by servicers to make them more affordable through government programs and industry initiatives. Servicers modified 2.08 million loans from the beginning of 2008 when the housing bubble burst through the end of the first quarter of 2011, the report noted. The modifications were not all successful, with 9.2 percent 30 to 59 days delinquent, and 18.2 percent “seriously delinquent” by the end of the second quarter. The OCC survey covers 32.7 million loans, which have $5.7 trillion in principal balances. These figures represent 63 percent of outstanding U.S. mortgages. (Reporting by Margaret Chadbourn, Editing by Andrea Ricci) Copyright 2011 Thomson Reuters. Click for Restrictions .

Read the full article →

Week Ahead: Housing and Consumer Confidence

September 23, 2011

Investors next week will review housing data and its close ally, consumer confidence . Plummeting home prices have taken their toll on consumer confidence as homeowners have reined in spending in proportion to the shrinking value of their house. Factory data is also on tap from three regional manufacturing surveys. Sales of new single-family homes in August is out Monday. The number has been stagnant at about 300,000 for several months and a boost is needed if the battered construction sector is to regain its footing. During the housing boom early last decade, a massive inventory glut of new homes was created in areas such as Las Vegas, Florida and areas of Southern California. Many of the homes were built on speculation, but no buyers ever materialized. The market is still trying to work through that glut and construction workers are suffering the consequences. The National Association of Realtors Pending Homes Sales Index for August is due Thursday. The influential S&P/Case-Shiller Home Price Index for July is due Tuesday. The U.S. housing woes are well documented and a revival of that sector is key to the overall economic recovery. But foreclosures are on the rise again, jumping 7% in August over July, according to housing research firm RealtyTrac, and default notices filed against delinquent homeowners rose 33% in August from the prior month. With foreclosures back on the rise and inventories glutted, home prices are expected to fall. The Wall Street Journal this week, citing a recent survey of 100 economists, said home prices, already down nearly 32% from their 2005 highs, are expected to drop another 2.5% this year and rise just 1.1% annually through 2015. All of these factors will weigh heavily on the Conference Board’s Consumer Confidence Index for September, also due Tuesday. Consumer spending makes up 70% of the U.S. economy, but most consumers are holding onto every dollar they can. The ripple effect has been devastating. The final reading of the Reuters/University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment Index for September is due Friday. The index currently stands at 57.8, the same level at the worst of the recent financial crisis. The Dallas Fed’s Texas Manufacturing Outlook is out Monday; the Richmond Fed Manufacturing Survey is due Tuesday; and the Kansas City Survey of Manufacturing on Thursday. A second revision of second quarter U.S. GDP is due Thursday, and a report on August personal income and spending is out Friday.

Read the full article →

Treasury Opens New Front In Investigation Of Failed Solar Energy Company

September 14, 2011

The Treasury Department’s inspector general has opened a new front in the investigation of the government loan to Solyndra, the now bankrupt company that had been touted as a model of President Obama’s ambitious green energy program, the Center for Public Integrity and ABC News have learned.

Read the full article →

Nine High Paying Jobs With Lots Of Time Off: 24/7 Wall St.

September 3, 2011

The vast majority of high-paying jobs require a significant initial commitment in the form of education, training and tuition, and then hard work while on the job. Most high-paying jobs require significantly more hours on the job than the average American puts in. 24/7 Wall St. has identified nine jobs that pay well above the national median income, while requiring less working hours than average.

Read the full article →

Nelson Davis: Helped by The Help

September 1, 2011

A motion picture titled The Help is proving to be a surprise late summer box office hit and after watching it recently, I wanted to know more about the author of the book on which the film was based. Among the things I found in the book, the film and the author’s personal story was a set of the most important lessons any business owner can ever learn. A Canadian friend strongly recommended that I read The Help because she knew that a small Alabama town was my birthplace and the stories of a group of black maids in the 1960s segregated south might interest me. The book was the uplifting first novel from Kathryn Stockett who was born in a small Mississippi city. It took her five years to complete and earned her about sixty rejection letters before finding a publishing home. The book was set in Jackson, Mississippi, during the early days of the civil rights movement when a tectonic social shift was beginning. Like my hometown, Andalusia, Alabama, it was a place where black women were trusted to raise white children but not necessarily allowed to handle and polish the household silver. The first small business lesson I gleaned from all this comes from the author’s journey and is simply about flat out, immovable-object persistence. In an article that Ms. Stockett wrote for More.com, she said that she was elated by the first rejection letter for her book which said the “Story did not sustain my interest.” I think she was elated because that letter probably gave her hope for being taken seriously as a writer. After the next fifteen rejections, Kathryn says that she was no longer feeling bubbly about the process. And by the time she had enough rejection letters to paper a wall, I’m sure that Ms. Stockett began to question the whole idea. Whether you are taking the first tentative steps toward starting your dream business or you are dealing with business threatening challenges, persistence determines the difference between success and failure. Winston Churchill’s advice to “never, never, never give up” comes to mind. Author Stockett had a lot more rejection headed her way before any tangible glimmer of success became obvious. With her best friends questioning what she was doing she had more than a few depressing days. The Help became such an obsession that according to her she became secretive about it even with her husband. How would you feel if sixty different people “didn’t get it” regarding your business idea and in fact rejected it as unworthy of success? From watching the film I saw the two main maid characters Aibileen (Viola Davis) and Minny (Octavia Spencer) demonstrate the second attribute needed for business and person success. Whether they were born with it or developed it over time, they had courage. No matter what happened to Aibileen, she wasn’t stopped. Slowed sometimes, hurt at other times, but she continued to be true to her personal sense of pride and values. Minny had a bit of a free spirited self destructive streak but in the end saw courage in others which helped uncover her own strength. Courage is what the civil rights movement demanded or what Steve Jobs demonstrated by returning to run Apple, the company he’d founded and been thrown out of. There is a bonus lesson in how The Help finally got to the marketplace and that is you have to take calculated risks. Amy Einhorn, whose imprint at Penguin Group USA published the book, took a calculated risk. Her boutique publishing operation was founded in 2007 and launched in February of 2009. The Help was the very first title published by Amy Einhorn Books. Kathryn Stockett had found a person willing to roll the dice with her and bring an end to the marathon of rejections. There is a real relationship between risk and reward. Perhaps like your business category, publishing has many reasons to doubt a healthy economic future. Kathryn Stockett braved a Everest of rejections and an ocean of self doubt on her way to seeing her idea achieve literary and movie success. Being based in Hollywood, I’m confident that there’s a long line of studio executives who passed on the notion that The Help could help their bottom lines. The movie is quickly closing in on $100 million in gross business. The book has since been published in 35 countries and three languages. As of August 2011, it has sold five million copies and has spent more than 100 weeks on the New York Times Best Seller list. It is so easy to give up on your dream if you allow the chorus of no to be the only music you hear. The Help lesson for me is that with persistence and courage seasoned by a shot of risk, you are a lot closer to the success you dreamed your business would be.

Read the full article →

U.S. Jobless Claims Fall With Verizon Worker Strike Over

September 1, 2011

WASHINGTON — Fewer people applied for unemployment benefits last week, a sign that the job market may be improving slightly. Weekly applications fell 12,000 to a seasonally adjusted 409,000 last week, the Labor Department said Thursday. It was the first decline in three weeks. A strike by Verizon workers drove applications higher during the previous two weeks. The strike has ended and is no longer affecting applications. The four-week average, a less volatile measure, rose last week to 410,250. Still, that was mostly because of the strike. It has come down from 440,250 in May. Applications typically need to drop below 375,000 to signal sustainable job growth. They haven’t been at that level since February. The downward trend suggests employers aren’t stepping up layoffs amid renewed concerns about the economy’s health. A sharp reduction in growth has fueled fears that the economy could be at risk of another recession. Stocks fell sharply in late July and early August. A batch of grim economic data, along with Standard & Poor’s downgrade of long-term U.S. debt, led to a sell-off. Stocks have recovered some of their losses. The Dow Jones industrial average is about 9 percent below its July 21 level. The government reports Friday on job growth in August. While the report is always important, economists will pay particular attention to the data to see if businesses pulled back on hiring in response to the plunge in stock prices and the gloomy economic outlook. The economy expanded at an annual pace of just 0.7 percent in the first six months of this year, the weakest six months of growth since the recession officially ended in June 2009. Economists expect growth will only improve to about a 2 percent pace in the second half of this year. Recent data suggests the July-September quarter is off to better start. Employers added 117,000 net jobs in July, about double the pace of the previous two months. Consumer spending rose that month by the most in five months, partly because Americans bought more cars and spent more to cool their homes. And businesses ordered more goods from factories, particularly autos and airplanes, the Commerce Department said Wednesday Still, hiring has slowed since earlier this year, and the unemployment rate remains high, at 9.1 percent. The economy added an average of 72,000 jobs from May through July, down from an average of 215,000 per month in the previous three months. More jobs are needed to fuel faster economic growth. Higher employment leads to more income. That boosts consumer spending, which accounts for about 70 percent of economic growth. Fewer people are continuing to receive unemployment benefits. About 3.74 million people received benefits in the week ending Aug. 20, a week behind the applications data. That’s a drop of 18,000 from the previous week. But that doesn’t include about 3.5 million additional laid-off workers who are receiving extended benefits under an emergency program put in place during the recession. All told, 7.3 million people received benefits in the week ended Aug. 13, the most recent data available.

Read the full article →

U.S. Worker Productivity Falls More Than Anticipated As Labor Costs Rise

September 1, 2011

WASHINGTON — Worker productivity fell this spring more quickly than previously estimated and labor costs rose at a faster clip. The decline in worker output could mean that some companies need to hire if they want to meet growing demand. The Labor Department reported Thursday that productivity declined at an annual rate of 0.7 percent in the April-June period. That was a downward revision from the 0.3 percent decline first estimated a month ago and the second straight quarterly decline. Labor costs rose at an annual rate of 3.3 percent, faster than the 2.4 percent increase originally reported. The changes reflected downward revisions made last week to overall economic growth. Productivity measures the amount of output per hour worked. Higher productivity is generally a good thing because it can raise standards of living by enabling companies to pay workers more without raising their prices and increasing inflation. A slowdown in productivity growth is bad for the economy if it persists for a long period. But it can be good in the short term when unemployment is high, if it means companies are reaching the limits on how much extra output they can get from their existing work forces. It can signal that companies need to increase hiring. Joshua Shapiro, chief U.S. economist at MFR, Inc., said many businesses are in a tough position because they cut so many workers during the recession and have little leeway to reduce staffs further unless demand “nosedives.” “Therefore, the gap between growth in output and the rate of expansion in total hours worked has narrowed, which by definition means slower productivity growth and therefore a more difficult environment for profit margins,” Shapiro said. Economists expect productivity to slow over the next couple of years while labor costs rise. However, they don’t see these developments as worrisome during the current period of high unemployment and weak income growth. Economists at JPMorgan Chase are forecasting that productivity this year will grow by just 0.7 percent. The drop in productivity in the April-June quarter followed a 0.6 percent productivity decline in the first quarter. The rise in unit labor costs in the second quarter followed a 6.2 percent increase in the January-March period.

Read the full article →

Will Marshall: Welfare Nostalgia Won’t Help Poor

August 30, 2011

Some liberal commentators marked the 15th anniversary of welfare reform last week with a curious lament: Welfare rolls aren’t growing fast enough. “If you think the point of the program is to help the poor, then no, welfare reform is not working,” asserts Ezra Klein of the Washington Post . He cites an article by Jake Blumgart in The American Prospect , who frets that welfare rolls have “merely inched upward” during the late recession and jobless recovery. “At the heart of the worst recession in 80 years, TANF (Temporary Assistance for Needy Families) funds only reached 4.5 million families, or 28 percent of those living in poverty,” Blumgart writes. “By contrast, in 1995, the old welfare system covered 13.5 million families, or 75 percent of those living in poverty.” Before we wax too nostalgic for the good old days of big welfare rolls, it’s worth remembering that progressives led the charge for welfare reform. “Ending welfare as we know it” was arguably President Bill Clinton’s most radical challenge to the political status quo, and the biggest policy change to happen on his watch. By the time he took office in 1992, the welfare system was held in nearly universal contempt by Americans across the socio-economic spectrum. Not only had it failed to make a dent in poverty, but taxpayers believed it undermined work, personal responsibility and family. The system also had failed the poor, providing them neither effective preparation for work or links to jobs, nor public subsidies sufficient to lift them out of poverty. Clinton had a better idea: Rather than subsidizing dependence on the state and isolation from the economic mainstream, public assistance ought to require and reward work. To “make work pay,” Clinton got Congress in 1993 to approve a massive expansion of the Earned Income Tax Credit, which is essentially a “work bonus” for low-wage earners. The credit has become a social policy rarity — an anti-poverty program that actually works. On Aug. 22, 1996, after having vetoed two draconian bills sent to him by the Republican Congress, Clinton signed a law which put a time limit on benefits, and replaced the old, open-ended welfare entitlement with a block grant to the states. In combination with the work bonus and other reforms (e.g., cracking down on deadbeat dads and expanding child care support) and a robustly growing economy, the results were galvanic. More than 7 million people left the rolls between 1996 and 2002. From its peak of 14.4 million in March 1994, the number of people on welfare dropped by 63 percent to 5.3 million in 2001. Millions of welfare recipients left the dole for jobs. Teen pregnancy and out-of-wedlock birth rates dropped dramatically. And the number of Americans living in poverty declined dramatically , by 7 million people. While some liberals predicted that ending the entitlement would produce scenes of Calcutta-style misery in America — and a few quit the Clinton administration in protest — the public heartily approved. By realigning U.S. social assistance with a strong work ethic and personal responsibility, Clinton’s reforms helped mitigate public hostility toward public assistance and unlock Americans inherent generosity — overall federal and state spending (including EITC costs) to support low-income families actually rose after 1996. They also deprived culture warriors of a favorite, racially tinged theme: When was the last time you heard a Republican candidate mock “welfare queens?” In the late 1990s, of course, jobs were plentiful. Now the economy isn’t creating enough jobs to bring unemployment back down to earth. Obviously this undercuts policies aimed at speeding transitions from welfare to work, and liberals are right to draw attention to the hardships the jobless recovery imposes on our most vulnerable families. But they are wrong to assume that welfare’s cash payments are somehow still central to America’s efforts to fight poverty, relieve social distress or shorten recessions. Clinton’s emphasis on “work first” made the unemployment system, rather than welfare, the safety net of first resort for low-income families in downturns. And indeed that is what has happened. According to a recent Urban Institute fact sheet : “Unemployment benefits substitute for welfare: three in ten low-income (below 200 percent of the federal poverty level) single parents received unemployment benefits in 2009, double the share receiving in 2005. This suggests that as more single mothers went to work during the late 1990s and early 2000s, more could qualify for unemployment benefits in the event of job loss. Also, many states have recently expanded eligibility for unemployment benefits.” The other big, countercyclical response to the recession and sluggish job growth has come from the food stamp program (now called SNAP). Last month, the Urban Institute reported that nearly 45 million people receive help from SNAP, an increase of about 69 percent since the recession began in 2007. Many states have seen dramatic growth in their food assistance caseloads as well. In other words, poor families increasingly rely on other social supports to tide them over hard times. Liberals have a point, however, in arguing against enforcing strict time limits on welfare benefits during a prolonged job drought. Although the Clinton reforms held up well during the 2000-2001 recession, this one is far worse. The “work-first” architecture isn’t perfect, and progressives should be open to sensible modifications based on new and unforeseen economic challenges. Rather than resurrect the old dependency-fostering entitlement, however, progressives should try more creative approaches. We should be prepared to spend more money to help more families from sinking into poverty through no fault of their own. But, in keeping with the spirit of Clinton’s reforms, new funding should go to support work. This could take the form of a new public works initiative or — perhaps more likely, given GOP control of the House — direct subsidies to employers to hire low-income workers. The states already have the ability to waive work requirements for a portion of their caseloads; Washington could broaden such authority temporarily, until job growth starts to pick up. Here again, the challenge will be getting GOP austerity freaks to get in touch with their inner “compassionate conservative.” In any event, it’s hard to see how relitigating the 1996 reform will help the poor. The entitlement ethos isn’t exactly making a comeback in America. And there’s no evidence it would work any better now than before. This item is cross-posted at the Progressive Policy Institute .

Read the full article →

Naveen Jain: Tips for Entrepreneurial Philanthropy

August 24, 2011

Helping people get what they need most in life is at the heart of successful philanthropy. It is no coincidence that fulfilling peoples’ needs is also the foundation of a successful business. I see no contradiction between them. Any venture, whether it is commercial or philanthropic, should aim at improving the lives of as many people as possible. Both should use technological tools to overcome infrastructure barriers and build scale. And both must be self-sustaining to be considered truly successful. I want to share with you what I have learned about philanthropy as person who was born in modest circumstances, as a boy who learned to take advantage of opportunities, as a businessman seeking new ways to create something of value for others, as a philanthropist trying to overcome global challenges, and as a father who wants the best for his children. At each stage of my life I have found that the values that matter most are those of an entrepreneur . . . someone who takes a risk and makes things happen; someone who is not afraid to fail because there are lessons to be learned from failure; someone who is focused on a mission rather than a static. I am convinced that only by applying the values of an entrepreneur to philanthropy will you ever be able to meet the needs of the greatest number of people. I understand human needs. I grew up where far too many people lived day to day without elemental needs like food and shelter. Compared to them I was fortunate. My father was a civil servant in the northern Indian where I was born. As a boy I saw the dire effects of poverty and illiteracy, especially on women and children. It often seemed that the only thing separating me from them was luck. But my parents didn’t believe in luck. They believed in hard work and in preparing me to take advantage of opportunity. Like many parents, they taught me to be generous but never to depend on the generosity of others. Because I was poor I had one special advantage. When you are poor, and basic survival is your concern, you have no alternative but to be an entrepreneur. You must take action to survive just as you must take action to seize an opportunity. That’s not to say no one helped me. Many generous people helped me and my family when we needed them. And that motivated me too. I promised myself to work hard so I would never be hungry and work harder still so that I could replay my neighbors’ generosity many times over – not just with money but with a clear path out of poverty. In some places the path out of poverty is through sports or other fields of excellence. In India, the path is through education. My parents drilled into me the importance of an education. It was a gift they themselves never had. I remember how my mother quizzed me in mathematics first thing in the morning and would often demand, “Don’t make me solve it for you.” Little did I know that she couldn’t solve it because she had never been taught math in school. They made sure I had the advantages they never had. I studied hard and earned an engineering degree and then an MBA. Because of my education I was ready when business opportunities began to open for Indian engineers. I seized one and used that opportunity to create many more as the founder of Moon Express, Intelius and InfoSpace. Along the way I never forgot who helped me and what I owed to them and others like me. I promised myself that one day I would be in a position to help my fellow countrymen and women, as well as anyone who is held back by lack of education, or by sexism, and grinding poverty. Today, I am privileged to be able to do that but not simply by giving money away. That is a temporary fix. Rather, I am approaching philanthropy in a strategic and systematic way just as an entrepreneur approaches a new venture. That’s the only way to make a self-sustaining difference in the world. My experiences as a child in poverty, as a business creator, and as philanthropist have taught me that there are at least four key elements for philanthropic success Overcome the Infrastructure . Many of the problems of poverty and need are really problems of physical infrastructure — not enough hospitals, too few schools, insufficient roads, bridges, and a lack of tools. This is what makes traditional philanthropy so daunting. You could build a thousand new hospitals in some parts of the world and barely make a difference. But what if you could capture the expertise of the world’s best physicians and create software that can diagnose patients remotely? Then infrastructure no longer matters. By turning an infrastructure problem into a technology challenge, you can eliminate the physical constraints of time and space. Build Scale . Technology allows you to replicate knowledge cheaply and reach many more people with it than you could in the physical world. To continue the example above, with diagnostic software you can now diagnose patients in every town, village, or farm in India. And you can do so objectively without the biases that even the best human physicians harbor. Make it Self-Sustaining . The problem now becomes, how do get this valuable diagnostic software and the device it runs on into the towns, villages, and farms where it can do the most good? You could enlist a wealthy donor to buy the devices and distribute them widely. But then you are beholden to physical constraints again — and even worse, you are dependent on a lifeline of someone else’s money. Instead of giving away $200 devices, why not allow people in the villages to rent them for $20 per month so they can go door to door making diagnoses for $5 each? That way everyone has an incentive to achieve the mission of getting the proper diagnoses to the greatest number of people. Instead of managing the whole program on your own, the program takes on a life of its own. Live an Entrepreneurial Life . By understanding and harnessing the forces that drive human behavior, you can create a self-sustaining philanthropic effort that reaches millions of people. It begins with an entrepreneurial attitude: take an idea and execute on that idea. If it doesn’t work, learn why and build on what you’ve learned. And be mission-oriented rather than goal-oriented. That way, if you do the best you can, you will always succeed. This is not simply an approach to philanthropy; it is an approach to life. Philanthropists can learn important lessons from business entrepreneurs. They both spend their time solving problems. And to be successful they both must overcome physical challenges and create self-sustaining operations. And ultimately, they must allow people to take action for their own benefit. Growing up in India I knew all I needed to change the world was one good opportunity and I prepared myself for it. When that opportunity came I was ready. I couldn’t count on luck so I created my own. Today, I’m sharing my passion for giving back with my children. I know they’ll approach the problems they want to solve in ways I never imagined and over time, research shows, if they are committed to philanthropy when they are young, they will make philanthropy a central part of their lives for years to come. That’s sustainable philanthropy. And we’re not alone. Because of the work of entrepreneurial philanthropists there are more new opportunities than ever opening up all over the world for the people who are prepared to grab them. Together, we are creating our own luck on a global scale. Find Naveen Jain on LinkedIn Twitter Google Plus Huffington Post Forbes Blogs

Read the full article →

Halliburton CEO Drinks Fracking Fluid

August 22, 2011

DENVER — An energy company executive’s sip of fracking fluid at an industry conference this month has been called a demonstration by some and a stunt by others, but it’s bringing attention to new recipes for hydraulic fracturing fluids that in the past have contained chemicals commonly used for antifreeze or bleaching hair. During a keynote lunch speech at the conference presented by the Colorado Oil and Gas Association, Halliburton Co. CEO Dave Lesar talked about addressing public concerns about hydraulic fracturing, which extracts natural gas by blasting a mix of water, chemicals and sand underground. He raised a container of Halliburton’s new fracking fluid made from materials sourced from the food industry, then called up a fellow executive to demonstrate how safe it was by drinking it, according to two attendees. The executive mocked reluctance, then took a swig. What he drank was apparently CleanStim, which when Halliburton announced it in November was undergoing field trials. A Halliburton spokeswoman didn’t respond to a question asking how that executive is doing now, or who he is. Instead, she referred a reporter to a web page on CleanStim. The Houston company, which has operations in about 80 countries, has said the product shouldn’t be considered edible. “I thought if this stuff was so benign, why wouldn’t the CEO drink it himself? That frankly was my first thought,” said Environmental Defense Fund’s Mark Brownstein, who saw the demonstration. “My second thought, more seriously, is on the one hand, I’m pleased to see Halliburton is taking steps to remove toxic chemicals from hydraulic fracturing fluid. I wonder why if they have this technology why it wouldn’t become standard practice. “I also do in some ways think the stunt is very much indicative of the problem the industry has in assuring the public that they are in fact taking public concerns seriously,” Brownstein said. “Because quite honestly, a homeowner in Pennsylvania doesn’t have the option of having an underling drink his water. He has to do it himself.” Roughly 90 percent of wells in the U.S. are fracked, according to the Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission. Each component of fracking fluid does something different, such as killing bacteria or preventing corrosion. As fracturing evolves, engineers have found other substances besides synthetic chemicals to perform those functions, said Colorado State University environmental engineering professor Ken Carlson, who also attended the conference. “The thing I took away is the industry is stepping up to plate and taking these concerns seriously,” Carlson said. “Halliburton is showing they can get the same economic benefits or close to that by putting a little effort into reformulating the fluids.” Companies have resisted disclosing exact recipes for fracking fluid for competitive reasons, and those who voluntarily post disclosures on a public online registry called FracFocus can exclude some chemicals. Halliburton’s website lists CleanStim’s ingredients as enzyme, exthoxylated sugar-based fatty acid ester, inorganic and organic acids, inorganic salt, maltodextrin, organic ester, partially hydrogenated vegetable oil, polysaccharide polymer and sulfonated alcohol. Brownstein said using ingredients from the food industry won’t necessarily make a fracking fluid safe for drinking water. “Salt is a food-grade ingredient, but if you have too much salt in your well water, your well water is not usable,” Brownstein said. Still Carlson said it was a good sign that Halliburton and others have introduced fracking fluids that they say are safer for the environment for reasons such as using biodegradable ingredients or allowing for less water use. ___ Online: ___

Read the full article →

Boomer Retirement May Weigh Down Stock Market For Next Two Decades

August 22, 2011

By Michael S. Derby of the Wall Street Journal The next quarter century or so could be a tough one for the stock market, researchers at the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco warn. In a paper released by the institution Monday, two of its staffers said the retirement of the Baby Boom generation stands to strip away from equities a key source of support. The ongoing wave of retirees won’t crater the market, but they may well be “a factor holding down equity valuations over the next two decades,” writes Zheng Liu and Mark Spiegel write. As they see it, what the Baby Boomers have given to the market is something like what they will be taking away. Allowing for the “theoretical ambiguities,” the economists noted “U.S. equity values have been closely related to demographic trends in the past half century” across several key metrics. “In the context of the impending retirement of baby boomers over the next two decades, this correlation portends poorly for equity values,” Liu and Spiegel write. (Read more: Uniforms Inspire Attendance, Not Achievement) As much as it is a problem for the market over the long haul, as retirees sell stocks to try to maintain their lifestyles, the “well known” nature of the troubles is also a problem for markets now. Indeed, if current investors now start pricing in the coming Baby Boomer headwind, they may “depress” stock prices. “These demographic shifts may present headwinds today for the stock market’s recovery from the financial crisis,” the paper said. Liu and Siegel allow that considerable uncertainty surrounds their work. Other important influences on the outlook for stocks are the performance of the bond market, as well as the appetites of foreign buyers. They cited China as one potential wild card, saying that nation and other emerging economies “may relax capital controls, which would allow their nationals to invest in U.S. equity markets.” That could counter some of the drag generated by U.S. retirees. Read more: What Do Markets Expect From Bernanke at Jackson Hole? There are, of course, even more risks that surround the stock market beyond what the paper flags. Equity prices have undergone considerable volatility of late after enjoying a sharp Federal-Reserve-engineered rally starting nearly a year ago. Equity investors are confronting a protracted period of economic weakness, and a central bank that appears to have few good options to restart growth. Should weakness prove longer-lasting than some expect, that itself may influence Baby Boomers’ retirement plans, and thus change the outlook for the market. The the entire post here.

Read the full article →

Robert Hormats: Eco-Friendly, Profit-Friendly

August 21, 2011

This article was co-authored by Robert D. Hormats, who serves as Under Secretary of State for Economic, Energy and Agricultural Affairs, and Kerri-Ann Jones who serves as Assistant Secretary of State for Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific Affairs. American companies face numerous competitive challenges today. While many are unique from those of decades past, one constant remains — the success of our businesses and economy as a whole is dependent on our ability to innovate and compete. To do this, we need to develop new products, new services, and new ideas. We also need to re-think how we do business, that is, we need to emphasize creativity and efficiency. The McKinsey Global Institute reports that to match the GDP growth of the past 20 years and the rising living standards of past generations, the United States needs to boost productivity growth from 1.7 to 2.3 percent a year. That’s a daunting figure. To achieve it, American companies need to examine all aspects of their operations, one of the most important being how they use energy and other natural resources. For example, the Environmental Defense Fund (EDF) has had great success working with businesses — from farmers to Fortune 500 companies — to improve their bottom lines by adopting environmentally friendly, eco-efficient practices to improve their operations. The central point is that eco-friendly and money-saving are not mutually exclusive terms — in fact, often simple changes in a company’s operations can accomplish both. Beginning in the 1990s, EDF and McDonald’s worked together to switch from foam-plastic sandwich boxes to paper-based sandwich wraps, eliminating some 300 million pounds of packaging waste over ten years. McDonald’s also saved $6 million per year. In 2000, EDF began a collaboration with FedEx to develop a cleaner, more efficient delivery truck. FedEx now operates one of the largest hybrid fleets in the industry, with more than 1,800 alternative energy vehicles worldwide, including the first all-electric parcel delivery trucks in the United States. As a result, FedEx saved over 66 million gallons of fuel over the last 10 years. And recently, EDF began working with Walmart to meet its goal of running entirely on renewable energy, creating zero waste, and selling a greater share of sustainable products. EDF is not alone in helping green American businesses. Indeed, many groups are engaged in similar efforts and achieving positive results that merit our recognition. For instance, The Dow Chemical Company and The Nature Conservancy recently announced a collaboration to develop new approaches to world challenges while demonstrating that environmental conservation is also good for Dow’s business model. Organizations such as the U.S. Green Building Council — a group of builders and environmentalists — are working to green and make more efficient companies’ infrastructure by designing buildings that will consume less energy, mitigate their environment impact, and cost less throughout their lifespan. The Council’s “Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design” or LEED rating system is setting a high standard for green buildings in the United States and is rapidly spreading to other countries. Businesses are saving money through LEED certified building designs and consumers throughout the world are demanding green buildings, creating an opportunity for American companies to show leadership and build value in a growing market. We at the State Department have partnered with the World Environment Center and multinationals such as Walmart to help small and medium sized enterprises around the world improve their environmental performance, reduce costs, and improve efficiency and competitiveness. Thirty-five small and medium sized businesses from Guatemala and El Salvador participated in the project to improve their environmental performance and have achieved a combined total savings of over $621,400 from an initial investment of $293,500. That’s a very attractive return on investment, in addition to the environmental benefits. Smart investors also recognize this opportunity. The private equity firm Kohlberg Kravis & Roberts (KKR) launched their Green Portfolio Program in 2008 to improve both the financial and environmental performance of their portfolio companies. The Green Portfolio Program focuses on areas such as greenhouse gas emissions, waste, water, and forest resources. The first eight of KKR’s portfolio companies to enroll in the program have thus far reported savings of over $160 million in operating costs; 345,000 metric tons of CO2 emissions; 8,500 tons of paper; and 1.2 million tons of waste. Because of these savings, KKR’s companies are better able to compete domestically and abroad. Here in our nation’s capital, the State Department is working with foreign embassies and international organizations, such as the World Bank, through the D.C. Greening Embassies Forum. In this venue, the diplomatic community exchanges best practices to improve their facilities and environmental sustainability. Foreign embassies are encouraged to install more efficient appliances, lighting, and plumbing fixtures, helping them to reduce their environmental impact and contribute to a better environment for the local community, all while saving money — a huge plus during these times of tight budgets. On the commercial side, it also enables embassies to showcase the latest and greatest green technologies and services, functioning as a marketing platform for each nation’s green industries. The State Department, through the Greening Diplomacy Initiative (GDI), is moving forward with ambitious plans to make its global operations more resource efficient and eco-friendly. We’re reducing energy consumption by consolidating our information technology platforms, lowering fuel costs by increasing the number of alternative fuel vehicles in our fleet, and improving the overall performance of our buildings by deploying efficient building design, practices, and equipment. In March of this year, the State Department stimulated the building of new wind and solar farms by entering into an Energy Savings Agreement with Constellation Energy, whereby 45 percent of the energy delivered to the Department’s capital region facilities will be new-source renewable energy. This agreement is not only cost neutral, but greatly enhances the Department’s ability to reduce its green house gas footprint and promote the U.S. renewable energy sector. It also complements the President’s goal of 80 percent clean energy for the nation by 2035. With more improvements underway, the Department expects to track significant cost savings while reducing its environmental footprint. Eco-friendly, profit-friendly efficiency is a win-win solution. This is a perfect opportunity for business, environmental groups, governments, and international institutions to work hand-in-hand to adopt new models for their organizations and infuse efficiencies that afford cost savings and a smaller eco-footprint.

Read the full article →

Tom Vander Ark: No Big Ideas?

August 20, 2011

Neil Gabler suggested in last Sunday’s New York Times that there are no more big ideas. Compared to the big thinkers of the past, the USC prof laments “If our ideas seem smaller nowadays, it’s not because we are dumber than our forebears but because we just don’t care as much about ideas as they did.” He admits some big thinking has just migrated to the marketplace but dismisses the greedy bastards trying to make a buck from “intellectually challenging thoughts.” About consumer electronics, Gabler says “these ideas may change the way we live, they rarely transform the way we think. They are material, not ideational.” This article has bothered me for a week because it doesn’t reflect my experience. I have the good fortune to spend all of my time with people engaged in learning innovations. To a person (even the capitalists of the bunch) the folks I interacted with this week are committed to educational impact at scale. I appreciate that impact is different than purely intellectual pursuits, but it often incorporates big ideas and always includes a challenge to conventional wisdom. Here’s a sample of 10 folks I talked to or talked about in the last five days: • An audience at the PDK/Gallup announcement with big questions about what we want students to know and about inequities in this American life. • A computer scientists devoted to building teacher capacity in K-12 and married to a scientist working on longevity and brain preservation. • A foundation exec trying to double the number of Americans with college degrees. • A former high-tech CEO that is committed to creating the best university in the world. • A tech exec that moved to Africa to build a network of high performing slum schools. • Three young tech execs that sold a company and are now building an information platform that will transform college preparation. • A video producer that has turned his attention to literacy with engaging video of young people debating great books. • A fund manager that devotes a lot of his time and resources to developing extraordinary urban secondary schools. • A 24-year-old that wants to set the standard for how all learning content will be shared • A former governor promoting deeper learning and gap-closing strategies None of these folks will spend the fall reflecting at Walden Pond, but helping more young people develop the intellectual capacity to connect with the idea economy is the most important work anyone can pursue, in my book. As evidenced by this list, the work of social enterprise often includes big ideas. As Gabler suggests, it’s easy to point to signs of anti-intellectualism in American, but I am encouraged by what appears to be a growing percentage of people, particularly young people, committed to making a difference. If you want to find big ideas today, look for people committed to impact.

Read the full article →

BJ Gallagher: Don’t Make Sales Calls… Make Service Calls

August 16, 2011

Each week I meet with a group of Los Angeles business owners and entrepreneurs — men and women from very different fields who share a common vision of being self-supporting through self-employment. Among the group are doctors, accountants, attorneys, real estate agents, writers, architects, artists, actors, PR agents, personal trainers, professional speakers, headhunters, musicians, construction contractors, literary agents, photographers, landscapers and more. The topic for this week’s meeting was: “What are you doing to keep your business going in these crazy-making economic times?” Several people said they have upped the number of cold calls they’re making; others talked about creative ways they’re using social networking to market themselves. Some are revamping their web sites and blogs; a few are exploring new business ideas, as they worry that their current businesses might not survive. When it was my turn to speak, I said, “I’ve stopped making sales calls. I make service calls instead.” The group looked at me, their faces registering everything from confusion to curiosity to disbelief to disdain. So I explained what I had learned from Chuck Chamberlain. Chuck was a successful businessman in commercial real estate development (specifically, grocery stores) in Los Angeles. Some years ago, he gave a series of lectures entitled “A New Pair of Glasses” ( published in a book by the same title). Recently, I listened to those lectures, now available on CDs. Chuck explained how he became successful … and very wealthy. He said he did not make sales calls — he made service calls. He was in the business of helping others be successful in their businesses. When Chuck called on a potential customer, he viewed it as no different from helping a neighbor with a project, visiting a friend in the hospital, or reaching out to help someone struggling with a serious personal problem — it was an opportunity to be of service. “How can I help you?” Chuck would ask. “How’s your business doing? What’s working? What isn’t working? Tell me about your challenges and problems.” He would listen with no agenda. He would listen with an open mind and an open heart — with a genuine desire to help the other guy build his business. If Chuck could help the other guy, he would. If he didn’t have the right service to offer, he would do his best to think if he knew anyone who could; then he’d refer the prospective customer to that other person. In his lecture, Chuck related how, on two or three occasions, he had a different motivation in calling on prospective customers… he was broke, and desperate to make a sale. “Whenever I went on a call feeling like ‘I NEED this sale; I HAVE to make some money today; I HAVE to close this deal’ — I came away empty-handed. I never once made a sale that way.” In other words, when Chuck called on people in order to GET something from them, he failed. When he called on people in order to SERVE them, he always got the sale. That was his “secret” to success. People are smart and intuitive. They can pick up on your energy and they know when you’re trying to get something from them. When people resist sales pitches, it’s because they know the real agenda is all about YOU. And … people also know when your intent is to help, to be of service, to contribute, to assist them in achieving their goals. When you approach them with that intent, they welcome you. They trust you… and they give you their business. I knew exactly what Chuck was talking about. For many years, fear had been the co-owner of my business. I ran scared, worried about where my next check was coming from. I did tons of PR, built several websites, chased down leads and curried favor with important people I thought could help me. I was always strategizing and scheming about how to become rich and famous. When I did get a big chunk of money or land on a national TV show, It made me happy – but not for long. The euphoria quickly wore off and I had to start chasing again — almost like an addiction. What’s more, in the chase for fame and fortune, I generated enormous stress, unhappiness, frustration, and anxiety for myself … as well as resentment toward those who had what I was chasing. This was a no-win game, for sure. I always said that my work was about service and contribution – and my mission statement said so, too. But it was only partially true. I did want to help others — but I often wanted recognition and money even more. My motives were mixed at best. I ran my business from a place of fear and scarcity … the same place millions of business people are operating from today. Chuck Chamberlain’s “new pair of glasses” reminded me of something I used to know, but had forgotten. The goal of business is to provide products and services that others need and want. The goal of business is to serve and contribute to others’ well-being. Money is the happy by-product. Money is one of the ways (but not the only way) we measure how well we’re doing. But in our culture today, it’s easy to lose sight of the true goal of business and get seduced into pursuing only money. I’m as guilty of this as anyone. Fear makes us chase after what we think will keep us safe. Fear makes us turn money into our god. When I finally stopped looking for what I could get and started looking for what I could give , everything changed. The recession didn’t go away, but my stress and anxiety did. Money started to flow in, often from unexpected places. I heeded Chuck’s example and followed his lead; it made me feel good about my work and optimistic about the future. Chuck taught me to build my business on a foundation of service and contribution. When I do my work well, the result is not just freedom from want … but also freedom from fear. After sharing Chuck’s ideas with my business group this week, I began wondering … What would business be like if everyone made service calls instead of sales calls? What would happen if business people adopted an attitude of “How can I serve?” instead of “What can I get?” What would Wall Street be like? What would Main Street be like? What would the world be like?

Read the full article →

Five Myths About The Dow

August 13, 2011

Charles Dowdevised the index in 1896 to give investors a snapshot of the performance of big manufacturing stocks (and of the U.S. economy) each day. The Dow still has an antique feel to it, but as a metaphor for the stock market, it remains unsurpassed: endlessly cited, parsed, followed, predicted — and misunderstood.

Read the full article →

Exxon Stays Ahead Of Apple As Top U.S. Company

August 13, 2011

NEW YORK — Exxon ended the week holding the title of the most valuable company in America after earlier being passed by Apple. Exxon Mobil Corp. shares rose 42 cents Friday to $72, although still down for the week. The oil company now has a market capitalization of $350.1 billion, compared with Apple’s $349.5 billion. Shares of Apple Inc., which makes the iPhone and iPad, rose $3.29 to $376.99. Apple first surpassed Exxon on Tuesday afternoon, but settled at No. 2 by the time the stock market closed. On Wednesday it kept the top spot after the close, with a market cap of $337 billion versus Exxon’s $331 billion. Exxon, which had held the top spot since 2005, regained it Thursday, helped by 3.4 percent increase in the price of oil. Oil ended 34 cents lower Friday at $85.38. It’s down 10.5 percent for the quarter. Many analysts can understand why investors may view Apple as the more valuable company. Exxon’s growth is tied to the price of oil and to the discovery of new oil sources. Apple, meanwhile, is limited only by innovation and ongoing demand for its products. That demand, for now, seems insatiable. Apple also has room to grow, since it commands just a small fraction of the smartphone and personal computer markets. Exxon shares are still down 11.5 percent since June 30, a time period when oil prices have also dropped 10 percent. Apple shares have gained 12.3 percent in the same time frame.

Read the full article →

White House Considering Renting Out 300,000 Foreclosed Homes

August 10, 2011

WASHINGTON — The Obama administration may turn thousands of government-owned foreclosures into rental properties to help boost falling home prices. The Federal Housing Finance Agency said Wednesday it is seeking input from investors on how to rent homes owned by government-controlled mortgage companies Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and the Federal Housing Administration. The U.S. government rescued Fannie and Freddie in September 2008 and has funded them since the financial crisis. The mortgage giants own or guarantee about half of the nation’s mortgages and nearly all new mortgages. At the end of last month, the government owned roughly 248,000 foreclosed homes, officials said. About 70,000 of those are listed for sale. But officials expect the number of foreclosures to soar in the coming months. Many foreclosures have been stalled so attorneys general and federal regulators can investigate whether lenders cut corners and improperly handled thousands of cases. Once a settlement is finalized, foreclosures are expected to pick up again and further depress home prices. Converting the homes into rentals may reduce “credit losses and help stabilize neighborhoods and home values,” said Edward DeMarco, acting director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency, which oversees Fannie and Freddie. Homes in foreclosure sell at a 20 percent discount on average, which can hurt prices of surrounding homes. It also might meet the growing demand for rentals. Since the housing meltdown, nearly 3 million households have become renters. At least 3 million more are expected by 2015, according to census data analyzed by Harvard’s Joint Center for Housing Studies and The Associated Press. A federal “request for information” released Wednesday included an option for previous homeowners to rent out the homes or for current renters to lease to own. Private investors could also be allowed to manage the rental properties. Officials are also mulling whether to only implement the program in areas hit hardest by foreclosures and in those with high demand for rental housing, such as Arizona and Florida. The homes include single-family homes and condominiums. The deadline for responses is Sept. 15.

Read the full article →

Whole Foods Responds To Ramadan Marketing Controversy

August 9, 2011

Whole Foods is the object of a growing controversy about the popular grocery chain’s treatment of Ramadan , the holy month of fasting for Muslims that started Aug. 1. On July 27, the retailer introduced a special promotion for the month of Ramadan on their blog, Whole Story , featuring special recipes and product giveaways for the month. This promotion also coincided with the introduction of a new halal-certified product line in Whole Foods stores. A day later, Fast Company posted an article highlighting Whole Foods’ online Ramadan campaign as a first for a major American food chain. The article presciently stated that although no major in-store promotions were planned, the Web and social media efforts were a bit of a risk in a U.S. marketplace that is often hostile to Islam. Unsurprisingly, the campaign garnered the notice of right-wing bloggers who promptly branded Whole Foods as “jihadist” and “anti-Israel.” The absurdity of this position may have been easily dismissed if not for the subsequent reaction by leadership at the company. On Tuesday, the Houston Press published a report revealing the text of an internal email circulated by Whole Foods executives to the chain’s stores. “It is probably best that we don’t specifically call out or ‘promote’ Ramadan … We should not highlight Ramadan in signage in our stores as that could be considered ‘Celebrating or promoting’ Ramadan.” The email went on to explain that the promotion previously announced on the company’s blog should not be misinterpreted to mean that the chain was celebrating or promoting Ramadan, saying, “The misinterpretation has generated some negative feedback from a small segment of vocal and angry consumers and bloggers.” Whole Foods’ apparent capitulation to an extremely vocal minority of Islamophobes has already drawn significant ire from bloggers and on Twitter . What’s your reaction to this story? Will this lead to significant trouble for the chain? UPDATE: Shortly after the publication of this story, Whole Foods publicly responded to the controversy on their Twitter feed , indicating the instruction to de-emphasize Ramadan was an isolated response by one of the company’s 12 operating regions and not indicative of company-wide policy. We are still carrying and promoting halal products for those that are celebrating Ramadan this month. We never sent a communication from our headquarters requesting stores take down signs or remove parts from this promotion. We have 12 different operating regions and unfortunately, one region reacted by sending out directions to promote halal and not specifically Ramadan after some negative online comments.

Read the full article →

Andrew Winston: A Giant of Sustainability: Rest in Peace, Ray

August 9, 2011

I just learned that one of my personal heroes, Ray Anderson , died on Monday at the age of 77 after battling cancer for that last 2 years. Ray was known best for his inspirational role in the world of sustainability (so many of the leaders of the movement count Ray as a role model ). And when I say inspirational, I mean it very personally. When I was searching for my mission in life over a decade ago, and was trying to find out how you could marry the strategies and tools of business with environmental concern, someone suggested I check out Ray’s book, Mid-Course Correction . It was literally the first step in my own transformation. After I had gone about my sustainability journey — my mid-course correction — for a number of years, I had the incredible fortune of sharing the stage with Ray at a conference a couple of years ago. Watching Ray the engineer lay out the irrefutable logic for a different way of doing business was like seeing the Beatles perform their greatest hits — it was all familiar, and we knew the tune, but it was still amazing to see it all live. I didn’t know Ray well, and I’m poorer for not spending more time with him. But I am glad I had the chance to tell him how important his work was to me. Ray’s books, including last year’s much more personal tale, Confessions of a Radical Industrialist , tell the amazing story of a deeply transformational experience, Ray’s own personal road to Damascus conversion. His journey began with a book as well, the remarkable and inspirational The Ecology of Commerce by Paul Hawken, which hit Ray like “a spear in the chest.” He had discovered what the rest of world is still figuring out… the business ecosystem that we had relied on, for all the success and wealth it created, was fundamentally broken. It treated the planet’s resources, the balance sheet of the world, as limitless and of no inherent value. As founder and chairman of Interface (a flooring company), Ray had never really thought about where all the materials in his petroleum-based products came from, or where they went after he sold a carpet tile (or millions of them). He had built a successful business of scale, employing many people, but now found himself wondering where he had gone wrong. Ray set Interface on a course to climb what he called ” Mount Sustainability ” and build a truly sustainable business… even one that replenishes the world instead of drawing down its resources. Over the last 17 years, Interface has discovered how hard a job that really is, but has arguably come further than any enterprise on the planet. Historians will report that in the late 20th century the world and its business giants began a slow, sometimes painful, pivot away from traditional industrial capitalism to something different… something healthier, more passion-driven, and, yes, more profitable. When they write about this period, a few names and moments will be pivotal. Ray’s conversion and evangelism will be at the center of that history. Instead of easing into retirement, Ray made it his mission to tell the world about his journey and wake business people up to the risks and opportunities in sustainability. He spoke to many thousands of people, giving an astonishing 1500 speeches. His books reached many thousands more. He fundamentally changed the careers and lives of many people looking for a deep connection to their work and their world. Count me among the converted. Thank you Ray for all that you did.

Read the full article →

Time For A Double Dip?

August 4, 2011

THIS ought to have been a good week for the American economy. The country’s leaders at last ended a ludicrously irresponsible bout of fiscal brinkmanship, removing the threat of global financial Armageddon by agreeing to raise the federal debt ceiling. Yet far from heaving a sigh of relief, investors are nervous. Stockmarkets around the world have tumbled (see article). On August 2nd, the day the debt deal was signed, the S&P 500 index saw its biggest one-day fall in over a year, and yields on ten-year Treasury bonds dropped to 2.6%, their lowest level in nine months, as investors sought safety.

Read the full article →

Curtis Arnold: Best Credit Cards for Back-to-School Expenses

August 2, 2011

With nearly 20 million American students heading for college and another 55 million kids in K-12 schools, parents often have to scramble for the extra cash necessary to buy books, clothing, backpacks, shoes, and everything else today’s students need to succeed in the classroom. According to the U.S. Census Bureau, American shoppers spent $7.4 billion in family clothing stores to get ready for the 2010 back-to-school season. Families spent another $2.2 billion in bookstores during the same period. What back to school really costs American Express breaks down the real costs of going to school in the latest edition of its nationwide Spending & Saving Tracker study. Over two-thirds of parents surveyed told researchers that they planned to purchase name-brand sneakers and jeans for their children before the first school bell rings this fall. A quarter of parents said they planned to outfit students with new portable computers before sending them off to campus, while two in five respondents revealed a desire to get their kids a good haircut at the end of the summer. In total, the average American family of four will spend about $800 to get their kids ready for a new semester, according to American Express. Today’s best credit card deals can help you recapture some of that household budget for yourself, or spread out part of those costs over the next few months. Best credit cards for back-to-school shopping Blue Cash Everyday Card from American Express The Blue Cash Everyday Card offers an exceptional set of year-round rebates that can help you save money during back-to-school season. If you plan on making a few road trips back and forth between home and campus, this card’s 3 percent rebate on “pay at the pump” gasoline purchases will come in handy. You may earn even bigger savings in dollar terms by using Blue Cash Everyday for its 2 percent rebate in department stores. Every purchase you make with the Blue Cash Everyday Card earns you at least 1 percent back in the form of Reward Dollars. While you can always redeem your Reward Dollars for cash back, you can also take advantage of American Express’s network of travel and merchandise partners. Redeeming your Reward Dollars for gift cards or exclusive merchandise deals can stretch your rewards further. For example, you can save money when treating your student to a meal at one of the restaurants participating in the Blue Savings Program. Chase Freedom Visa Wanna make some fast cash on back-to-school travel and lodging? This card offers cash rebates of up to 5 percent on eligible travel-related costs (gas, hotels and airlines) during July, August and September. Sign up for this category during the time window and you can earn up to $75 more in rewards during your campus move. Chase has been offering a series of special sign-up bonuses to attract new cardholders. At the moment, Chase Freedom Visa offers a $200 reward for new customers who spend $500 within 90 days. That’s like getting a 40 percent discount! This is on top of the card’s everyday rebate of 1 percent on all purchases. The American Express Premier Rewards Gold Card OK, this might sound like an unconventional pick for back-to-school shopping, since it’s usually the card of choice for plane-hopping business travelers. Despite its $175 annual fee, this charge card can save you money if you’re sending a child off to a faraway college. When you use this AmEx Gold Card to book airline tickets, you’ll earn three Membership Rewards points for every dollar in airfare. At the moment, American Express offers new cardmembers 15,000 bonus Membership Rewards points after spending $1,000 on the card within 90 days. If you spend a total of $30,000 or more on this card in a calendar year, you’ll earn an additional 15,000 American Express Membership Rewards points. You can convert your point balance to miles in your favorite frequent flier program or use your points to pay for a discount airfare through AmEx’s travel rewards website. High-flying college students can rack up miles and rewards quickly, especially during semester breaks and holiday visits. Citi Dividend World MasterCard Got a few kids in school? Need to spread the spending hit over a few months or even the whole school year? The Citi Dividend World MasterCard can help you pay off this season’s back-to-school shopping over the next 15 months with a zero-percent introductory offer. New cardholders earn an extra $100 after spending $500 or more during their first 90 days with the card. Enroll in this season’s special promotion, and your Citi Dividend World MasterCard will pay you back with a 5 percent bonus rebate on airfares, hotel bills, and car rentals through the end of September. You can also earn up to $300 in cash-back rewards with a 1 percent rebate offer on your first $30,000 in other purchases. How to find the best credit card Here are a few tips for choosing the best credit card deal: Compare credit cards based on their annual fees, their reward structures, and their partner relationships to learn which lender has the best deal for your family. Because opening a new credit card account can impact your FICO score, look beyond any short-term bonuses and think about how a card can get you the best long-term rewards. Remember to consider whether issuing an extra card to your college student can help them learn to manage cash responsibly while preparing them for emergencies. If you partner with your student to handle routine expenses through a single rewards credit card, you can maximize your rewards while eliminating late-night cash transfers. As with all credit cards , protect your credit history by using them responsibly, reading the agreement carefully before signing up, planning your purchases to maximize any rewards and sign-up bonuses, and setting a budget and payment schedule that you can handle. Important Note! The information in this article is believed to be accurate as of the date it was written. Please keep in mind that credit card offers change frequently. Therefore, we can not guarantee the accuracy of the information in this article. Please verify all terms and conditions of any credit card prior to applying. The original article can be found at CardRatings.com: ” Best credit cards for back-to-school expenses ”

Read the full article →

Restarting Government After Shutdown More Than Flipping Switch

July 17, 2011

The post and live blog below are a collaboration between Patch and HuffPost reporters. ST. PAUL, Minn. — Minnesota may soon have an end to its government shutdown, but re-starting the machinery of the state will probably take a few days. Democratic Gov. Mark Dayton and Republican legislative leaders were aiming for a special session as early as Monday to finalize a deal struck late last week. If rank-and-file lawmakers sign off on the deal, it will end a shutdown that’s the longest in recent U.S. history. But for residents whose lives have been disrupted, the relief won’t be immediate. “It’s not like we can just flip a switch,” said Doug Neuville, a spokesman for the state Department of Public Safety, which has halted renewal of driver’s licenses and vehicle tabs during the shutdown. The computer systems used to issue renewals take time to bring back online, and the services won’t be immediately available, he said. Same goes for closed rest stops and state parks. State budget office spokesman Jonathan Pollard said those must be cleaned and thoroughly checked before people can use them again. Road construction projects idled by the shutdown are likely to require safety checks before work can resume. Licensing hang-ups for beer distributors could take several days to unsnarl as well, as returning state workers deal with backlogs that built up during the shutdown. “It depends on the level to which the services were down,” Pollard said. “If you have an agency that’s mostly been up and functioning, it may be easier than if you have an agency that’s been completely shut down.” The Dayton administration will likely consider the shutdown officially over once the governor signs new budget bills into law, Pollard said. Below, a live blog of the latest developments to unfold in Minnesota.

Read the full article →

Strategic Defaulter Walks Back To His Mortgage

July 15, 2011

Ernie Soto and his wife are moving back into their house in Alamogordo, N.M., the same house they abandoned at the beginning of 2010 after Soto lost financing for his fledgling mechanic business. Soto, 47, said that when they moved into a nearby trailer that January, they didn’t expect their house would just sit there, vacant, for a year and a half. They didn’t know that at that time that it was taking banks 410 days on average to actually seize a home after its owner quit making payments, according to data from Lender Processing Services . (It now takes 580 days.) So when Soto heard of a new program that helps struggling borrowers — but only ones who are still in their homes — he decided he should move back into the still vacant home and give it a shot. Soto said he told himself, “Okay, I’ll move my ass back in there.” He and his wife brought most of their belongings back to the house this week. He told the company that services the mortgage, Ocwen, that he wanted to work something out. He said Ocwen turned him down for a mortgage modification on Thursday. Now he’s going to try to get into the federal Emergency Homeowners’ Loan Program , which would pay his arrears — the money that should have already been paid — with a forgivable loan that would also subsidize mortgage payments for two years. The $1 billion temporary program is part of the 2010 Wall Street reform bill. Earlier this year Soto landed a job at a furniture rental store, to which he said he commutes more than 200 miles a day. He’d been totally unemployed since April 2010, when he lost his job as a manager at a car dealership. He said he’s going to have to fork over $1,100 to get the electricity and gas reconnected. “We’re hoping we can get it all fixed,” Soto said. “I didn’t expect this kind of expense. A few years back I could have told you it was nothing, I had it in my front pocket.” HuffPost reported Soto’s decision to ditch his mortgage in a February story that probed the financial and psychological consequences of strategic default. Borrowers who owe more than their homes are worth are more likely to stop making payments even if they can afford to, but most borrowers in this situation, known as being “underwater,” keep paying even though it may not be in their financial best interest. (That’s why it’s called “strategic default” and not “stupid default.”) Soto gave up on his mortgage after draining his savings to stay current, going through both a bankruptcy and a thoroughly frustrating time trying to get a modification. The indignity of it really got to him. The low point came when he had to put down his sick dog, which he said he remembers vividly. He’d arrived at the Ark Animal Hospital, a one-story building off a four-lane road in Alamagordo in August 2009. “I pulled up in the truck. He knew, the dog knew, ‘I don’t recognize this place. Something’s gonna happen and I don’t wanna go in.’ I had him outside, he wouldn’t go in with me.” As Soto tried to coax nine-year-old Petey, named for the Little Rascals’ Pete the Pup pit bull, a tow truck pulled into the lot. Its driver recognized Soto and his 2000 Ford Ranger. “He’s like, ‘Are you Ernie?’ He’s like, ‘I’m here to pick up the truck.’ I says, ‘Can this wait?’ He’s like, ‘It really can’t.’ He gets on the phone. He sees what’s happening.” Soto said the repo guy got on the phone with his superior and tried to explain what was going on to see if he could get out of the assignment, but the superior had no sympathy for Soto. ‘He told me, ‘Man, I gotta stay. I got to take the truck. I’ll let you gather your things.’ ” Soto said. “I got the dog on one side, I got people going in and out. So I called my wife and said, ‘You know, I’m sorry, you’re going to have to come and get me.’ ” “My wife finally shows up, we both walked in with the dog and they put him down. Of course they did what they did and the guy hauled the truck off. I went back to work.” Soto said he wouldn’t have left his house when he stopped making payments if it hadn’t been for that experience. “I was in unfamiliar territory. I don’t lose houses every so often,” he said. “I was thinking it’d be like the car, they’d come throw me out in three months.” Now that he’s back in his house, Soto sounds much more hopeful. “I’m still upset but I’ve learned to deal with it a little differently,” he said. He wants to tell his story so other people know they’re not alone. “They just need to keep trying,” he said.

Read the full article →

Want A Good Job? Study Science

July 14, 2011

As a firestorm of debate rages in Congress over economic stability, the Department of Commerce released a report on Wednesday asserting that jobs in science, technology, engineering and math (STEM) play “a key role in the sustained growth and stability of the U.S. economy.” Although science and engineering workers represent a relatively small portion of the labor market, the report projected that between 2008 and 2018, science and technology-focused jobs would grow by 17 percent — nearly twice the 9.8 percent rate of growth for other occupations. “One of the real concerns is, how do you create a competitive economy and workforce?” Acting Deputy Secretary of Commerce Rebecca Blank told HuffPost. “We need to create skills that will keep us at the forefront — and this is a group that is crucial for the country’s long term competitiveness and innovation.” Science-based jobs are not only important for future growth, they have also fared well during the current sluggish economy. According to the report, the unemployment rate for science and engineering degree holders was half the national rate. While STEM workers experienced increased unemployment from 2007 to 2009, their jobless rate in 2010 was at 5.3 percent. The unemployment rate for other sectors was nearly 10 percent. “STEM occupations are really good occupations,” Blank said. “It’s important that people get that message.” The report, which analyzed data from the Census Department’s 2009 American Community Survey and the Bureau of Labor’s Current Population Survey , found that there were 7.6 million STEM workers in the U.S., representing 5.5 percent of the national workforce in 2010. Further making the case for the sciences, the report concluded that STEM-educated graduates at any level — whether high school, college and graduate degrees — make 26 percent more money overall than counterparts who have studied in other fields. And this remains true regardless of the fields STEM degree holders ultimately pursue. Even STEM grads who took jobs in fields unrelated to science, technology, engineering and math were able to command higher salaries on average. In some part, the success of graduates who study the sciences is to be expected. Sixty-eight percent of workers in the sciences have a bachelor’s degree or higher, and income rates tend to rise with additional education. The report noted that other factors independent of focusing on the sciences, including race, age and socioeconomic factors, play a role in determining income. Yet when the authors did a controlled for other factors, STEM workers still enjoyed higher wages, although they did diminished to a degree. Echoing President Obama’s recent push for innovation and greater emphasis on science and math education , Mark Doms, a chief economist at the Department of Commerce, told HuffPost that community colleges and technical colleges play a key role in training — and retraining — skilled workers, as well as preparing Americans for the 21st century jobs market. “A Microsoft-trained engineer does not need to go to four year college,” Doms said. But he cautioned the community colleges, which receive funding from state and local governments, are under threat, as states find ways to cope with diminished revenues. “They are firing staff, shutting offices and cutting budgets,” Doms said. Blank, for her part, spoke to the difficulty facing would-be science graduates — even at four year colleges. “[Those institutions] tend to be much smaller, with lower admission rates, compared to liberal arts schools around the country. So you’re constraining the supply of a group you don’t actually want to constrain.” The question, Blank said, is: “How to bring more people in?” “Perhaps we need more schools to serve people of these backgrounds better,” she said. “It’s something the higher education folks need to be debating.”

Read the full article →

Look Out, Employers: Labor Shortages Could Give Workers The Upper Hand

July 5, 2011

The mining and software industries have at least one thing in common. A labor scarcity, or a shortage of skilled workers, could affect the profit margins for both of them, according to a report issued by Fitch Ratings Tuesday afternoon. “Investors would be well served to identify companies in sectors confronting tight and/or fragmented labor supply,” the report reads. These sectors include technology, natural resources (such as oil and gas, or mining), and unionized industries like autos and airlines, the report claims. The inability of certain sectors to find appropriately skilled workers would indicate some level of structural unemployment, an economic scenario in which joblessness remains high because of a mismatch between laborer skills and employer needs, rather than a lack of consumer demand. Under these conditions, the report warns, labor inflation in these certain sectors could result in reduced output and lower profits for employers. However, the situation, specific to a small number of industries, might be masked by the overall national unemployment rate, currently stuck at 9.1 percent , according to the report. The Fitch report cites mining as one sector where a modest labor force and heavy union activity could push wages higher. The report notes there were 23,000 mining and natural resource job openings in May. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, though, mining has added 115,000 jobs since October 2009, including 7,000 new jobs in May of this year. Another industry to watch is shale drilling, according to the report. Since different kinds of shale can vary so widely, skilled laborers in this area have highly specialized knowledge, which makes them “not fully interchangeable,” in Fitch’s phrasing. Shale drilling is undoubtedly a dynamic industry; it’s been reported that between the fourth quarter of 2009 and the first quarter of 2011, 72,000 people got hired as a result of drilling in the Appalachian-area Marcellus Shale rock formation. However, there were only about 9,300 new jobs created, according to The Wall Street Journal , and the positive impact of the drilling on local communities is a matter of some debate . A third industry that could be affected by labor shortages, according to the Fitch report, is the tech sector, where companies are being forced to lay out more and more generous stock options in order to attract the best talent. In the past year and a half, numerous sources have reported that skilled labor is harder to come by, more or less across the board . Manufacturing, tech, construction, accounting, and farming are among the sectors where the available jobs reportedly outnumber the qualified workers. While the Fitch report concludes that “broad based inflation may not be an immediate threat,” given the enervated state of the U.S. economy, it adds that “localized inflation pressures may have meaningful impacts on margins and project timetables in select industries.”

Read the full article →

Jeff Schweitzer: Why the Tea Party Is Wrong

July 5, 2011

History has proven beyond doubt that capitalism works. When reasonably regulated to moderate excess no other system of economic organization can better create wealth, promote stability and improve lives. Capitalism is successful because it appeals to rather than fights our basic human instinct for self-survival. But like any complex system of human organization, capitalism has inherent flaws. The robber-baron era of unbridled excess led to monopolies, which crushed any competition, which in turn undermined the application of free market forces to match supply and demand. Unregulated capitalism devolves into an oligarchy. Around 1900, an amazing 45% of all wealth was held by just one percent of the richest households. John D. Rockefeller’s fortune once equaled 1.53% of the U.S. economy, about $600 billion today. A reasonable question about Rockefeller (Carnegie, Gould, Mellon, Vanderbilt) is, “so what?” Why is concentrated wealth detrimental to society? Rockefeller’s fortune came from a monopoly that forced virtually all grocery/hardware stores that sold kerosene or lubricants to stock only Standard Oil products. Hard to imagine today but nearly 80% of Americans were served by Standard Oil — and by no other oil company. Without regulation capitalism behaves like the Tacoma Narrows Bridge in which cycles of instability add to each other cumulatively until the system collapses. The most recent example is the disintegration of the banking and housing industries following a decade of careless deregulation of Wall Street. The bottom line is that capitalism works, but needs to be modified from its purest form to be most effective. As with capitalism, history has proven that a government of, by and for the people is the best form of political organization. Winston Churchillmore aptly said in quoting an unknown predecessor, “… democracy is the worst form of government — except for all others.” Our form of government is a messy compromise among deeply divided factions at the Constitutional Convention. Early on our government was of, by and for landed gentry. Slaves and women come to mind. Many practical tweaks to democracy’s purest form are meant to protect the minority voice (small states, individuals). Just as unfettered capitalism leads to monopolies, which destroy capitalism, our founders understood unfettered democracy leads to tyranny of the majority, which destroys democracy. Like capitalism, democracy works, but needs to be adjusted from the ideological purest form in order to reach its full potential. Ronald Reagan claimed that “government is not the solution to our problems, government is the problem.” Ignoring the irony that he was seeking to lead the government he argued was the problem, he was fundamentally wrong. The problem is the inevitable flaws in any complex human organization, private or public. We have developed an American myth about the magical efficiency of market forces and have deified entrepreneurs. We have developed a growing disdain for government as an obstacle to progress. Neither is entirely true or false: capitalism is not wholly good; government is not entirely bad. Both the private sector and government are essential, and both are flawed. Our future lies in our ability to balance one against the other, extracting the best from both and minimizing the worst from each. This is where the Tea Party specifically, and conservative Republicans generally, have utterly failed. They have lost all sense of balance, relying solely on a mythical private sector that has no counterpart in the real world. Government as Devil Experience shows that privatizing what should legitimately be a government function rarely has a good result. The two most obvious examples are education and the armed forces. Ensuring that we offer free (mandatory) education for all children is inherently a governmental responsibility, one to which our founders devoted much thought. Yet some propose that the deplorable state of education can be cured by market forces. Unfortunately, attempts to improve education by creating competition among select charter schools has resulted in fraud, abuse and nepotism — and lower standards of education — where such systems have been tried in California, Texas, Ohio and Pennsylvania. We’ve seen some great successes with charter schools, but the failures undermine the claim that competition is always the answer. We have privatized our military to some significant degree with decidedly mixed results. Blackwater is one example of things gone wrong when we slice off from our government tasks that should remain with our elected officials and armed forces. We could easily anticipate that hiring men and women to act as soldiers but without the oversight, training, or discipline so essential to a professional military force would lead to trouble. Blackwater operatives were involved in a deadly shootout in the streets of Baghdad in 2007 that left 17 Iraqis dead and 20 wounded. Blackwater’s actions were so egregious that the incident lead to murder charges. While those charges were later dismissed by a judge in the U.S., nobody can be proud of what was done that day. We also have to worry about the agenda of those mercenaries. Case in point, a former employee of Blackwater alleges that Erik Prince , the company’s founder, “views himself as a Christian crusader tasked with eliminating Muslims and the Islamic faith from the globe,” and that Prince’s companies “encouraged and rewarded the destruction of Iraqi life.” Too much government is bad, but so is too little. We must strive for a government that is as big as necessary, and no bigger. The Tea Party is blind to that critical balance; they seek to diminish government without maximizing its essential and necessary good. Members of the Tea Party revere our founders but miss the subtleties of their genius and contort their ideas to fit their ideology. Private Sector Savior After wading through multiple menus and dozens of options, does anybody waiting on hold or sitting at home all day to meet the repairman “any time between 8 am and 5 pm” view cable providers or telephone companies as the ideal example of efficiency? Our government is inefficient by design to prevent precipitous action; companies large and small are inefficient through incompetency and mismanagement (which of course also contribute to government inefficiency). Getting government “out of the way” of entrepreneurs, a popular Tea Party idea, has failed miserably on the false assumption that all government regulation is a brake on economic growth. That claim is naive. Only through government regulation can we approximate an even, open and honest playing field that encourages rather than impedes economic growth by creating common expectations of transparency and integrity in information exchange. Yes, too much government regulation is clearly detrimental and stifling; but too little is equally deleterious. We need balance. Just review the laundry list of malfeasance in the financial sector to see what happens when balance is lost. Here are just some of the firms, funds and financial gurus that have been accused of bilking investors : Goldman Sachs , Bernard Madoff, Enron , Dennis Kozlowski , WorldCom , Adelphia Communications , Rite Aid , Morgan Stanley , Dick Strong , Janus, Bank of America’s Nations Funds, Bank One’s One Group funds, Alliance Capital, Prudential Securities, Putnam Investments , Merrill Lynch, Wilshire Associates and Brocade Communications . How can anybody witness the fraud and abuse on Wall Street and dismiss corruption as the outlier? This cauldron of waste, fraud, abuse and inefficiency is the private sector so beloved by the Tea Party. How many times do we have to be burned before realizing that without supervision (i.e. government regulation), these kids are going to break something (collapse our entire financial system)? Capitalism and entrepreneurship drive our economy. But in the absence of reasonable government regulation they spiral out of control leading to collapse. Once again, we need balance, using the awesome power of market forces to promote growth and wealth, moderated against self-destructive excess with government oversight. The Tea Party has it all wrong. Their agenda is naïve, dangerous, ill-conceived and neglectful of all the history we know. I would like to add a personal note. I worked in the federal government (State Department and White House) for 11 years, and for the past 15 years as a successful entrepreneur/business owner. Comparing those experiences, the smartest, most dedicated, hardworking and talented people I encountered were in government. By far the worst bureaucratic maze I ever encountered was in the private sector, engaging a large multinational corporation with which my company was to become a certified vendor. For three months we daily battled paperwork, unreasonable demands for documents already sent, conflicting or duplicate requests from different departments, and self-contradicting, inconsistent and ever-changing criteria for certification. Other vendors with fewer resources and less patience dropped out in frustration. Ronald Reagan was then, and the Tea Party is now, wrong, terribly wrong. The problem is not government; it is large complex organizations, which become inherently inefficient with size whether in the private or public sector. There is amazing talent in both sectors. Balance is the key to our future, but the Tea Party and their Republican sympathizers completely miss that point. We all suffer for their irrational fear of one and idolization of the other. Jeff Schweitzer is a scientist, former White House senior policy analyst and author of Calorie Wars (July 2011) and A New Moral Code (2010). Learn more about Jeff at http://jeffschweitzer.com .

Read the full article →

For A Change, Gas Cheaper On Independence Day Than Memorial

July 2, 2011

(AP) NEW YORK — Call it an Independence Day discount. Gasoline prices usually peak in the summer. This year, however, they peaked a little earlier, on May 5. The subsequent slide has made gas about 24 cents per gallon cheaper than it was on Memorial Day. The national average now stands at $3.55 per gallon. That’s the cheapest gasoline has been since late March. Tom Kloza, publisher and chief oil analyst at Oil Price Information Service, expects the national average to drop another 25 to 30 cents per gallon this year. “Prices will be lower until we get to hurricane season, then who knows?” Kloza said. Hurricanes that pass through the Gulf of Mexico can potentially disrupt oil production and force fuel prices higher. While gas is cheaper than it was on Memorial Day, it’s hardly inexpensive. It’s still 79 cents more than a year ago. And the only other year gas prices were higher for the July Fourth holiday was 2008, when gas was around $4.10 per gallon. The drop in gas is due to a decline in oil prices. Benchmark West Texas Intermediate has given up more than 16 percent since the beginning of May. The contract for August delivery lost 48 cents to settle at $94.94 per barrel Friday on the New York Mercantile Exchange. In London, Brent crude fell 71 cents to settle at $111.77 per barrel on the ICE Futures Exchange. Oil fell Friday after China reported that its manufacturing industry cooled off in June, slipping to its slowest pace in 28 months. Activity slowed down as credit tightened due to inflation-fighting measures and weaker oversea demand. The country is still expected to drive world oil demand for years, but a slowdown in manufacturing could temper the demand for fuels. In the U.S., however, factory activity picked up in June, in part because of lower fuel prices. The Institute for Supply Management, a trade group of purchasing executives, said Friday that its index of manufacturing activity has increased for 23 straight months. In other Nymex trading for August contracts, heating oil dropped 2.18 cents to settle at $2.9245 per gallon and gasoline futures added less than a penny to settle at $2.9726 per gallon. Natural gas fell 6.3 cents to settle at $4.33 per 1,000 cubic feet.

Read the full article →

Woman ‘Shocked’ Over Abercrombie & Fitch Headscarf Firing

June 28, 2011

Hani Khan, 20, of Foster City said she had never faced discrimination before being fired from an Abercrombie & Fitch subsidiary at Hillsdale Mall.

Read the full article →

Judith Samuelson: Going Long

June 20, 2011

A study released last week that examined corporate profitability is causing consternation in the ranks of the Corporate Social Responsibility industry, not necessarily because of its findings but the misleading way they’re being summarized by the business press. The New York Times , for example, offered this headline: ” To Be Good Citizens, Report Says, Companies Should Just Focus on Bottom Line ,” And within hours a half-dozen friends and colleagues forwarded the link, along with this general message — “Another assault on CSR!” Sadly, none of them had the opportunity yet to read the actual study , apparently including the headline writer for the Times . Far from “dissing” the concerns and campaigns of CSR, the authors, Daniel Altman of New York University and Jonathan Berman of Dalberg Global Development Advisors, focus on the essential connection between business success and societal well-being: a long term time horizon. If a company thinks and acts long, the authors argue, the decisions it makes about where and how to invest — are likely to create efficient private, as well as societal, benefits. In other words, with a long term view, the choices the company makes will be the most strategic. And if you have a long enough time horizon, a singular focus on profit is sufficient to guide wise choices. Amen. “With a long enough time horizon,” begins the paper, titled ‘The Single Bottom Line,’ “many social benefits created by the operations of for-profit companies can generate private benefits for the companies themselves. As a result, executives planning for the long term create social benefits in the most efficient way when they target a single bottom line — profit.” The message has edge; I like it for several reasons. First, the authors take a bat to recent notions intended to promote CSR, such as “double bottom lines,” “triple bottom lines,” and the new kid on the block, “Shared Value.” These concepts certainly sell books, but they confound business people trying to figure out what to do. The same goes for terms such as “b-corps” and “social enterprises.” These are useful notions for those building businesses that are anchored in social missions or for companies designed to appeal to green consumers, like Whole Foods, but are less helpful for most other firms. Terminology that alludes to the social role that business plays is valuable because such words help illuminate the interdependence of business and society. But in general, in the world of public companies and complex markets, multiple bottom lines are too complex to be taken seriously by those who are calling the shots. And that’s where we need the most help — in those massive globe-trotting, resource consuming, public companies that are required to report earnings every quarter. For those companies, Altman and Berman’s conclusion that a long term time frame is most profitable and beneficial for society is welcome news indeed. The authors also bring to light the important role that government plays in business success when it tackles issues such as investment in infrastructure and education, and environmental regulation, which by and large are outside the control of business, but are vital to its success. Finally, the article reminds us that the essence of a company is not its philanthropy, and a company’s charitable efforts rarely offer a window into its core values. In too many cases, a firm’s philanthropy becomes a container for the loftiest aspirations of its leaders, who actually exercise far more societal influence through their business decisions — such as how they hire and train their workers, source their products, and market their goods and services. The further removed one is from Wall Street’s obsession with quarterly profits, the more the wisdom of adhering to a long-term timeframe seems to make fundamental sense. My father was an engineer, a lifer with “The Phone Company.” Once, when I attempted to explain what I do — without lapsing into the jargon of CSR and sustainability and stakeholders and all that — there was a long pause before he spoke: “Aren’t you just trying to say that business ought to take a long term view?” Again, I say, Amen.

Read the full article →