bank

menafn.com…

(MENAFN – Alrroya) On September 16, 1992, a date that lives in infamy in the United Kingdom as “Black Wednesday,” the Bank of England abandoned its efforts to keep the British pound within its …

See the original post here:
UK- Can Central Banks Still Influence Exchange Rates?

Find our Weekly Commercial Real Estate, Private Equity and Fund Newsletters at www.WeeklyBrief.net

{ 0 comments }

Huffington Post…

As financial markets brace for the possibility of a Greek debt default, economic officials here are sketching out doomsday scenarios in a grim acknowledgment that even the world’s strongest economies are vulnerable. With Greece shelling out record interest rates, and with some frustrated investors pushing for a default , economists fear that the collateral damage from a credit event could reach these shores. By virtue of our connections to institutions throughout Europe and our reliance on credit, British banks bear heavy indirect exposure to Greece, setting them up for significant losses if the currently perilous Greek debt situation were to evolve into a full-blown crisis, the UK central bank said in a news conference late last month. No one, in other words, is immune. “It’s this issue of interconnectedness in the financial system that policymakers are so worried about,” said Richard Barwell, a London-based economist at Royal Bank of Scotland. “It’s difficult for anyone to be convinced their balance sheet is secure unless they know that the people they’ve lent to, and the people that they’ve lent to, all their sheets are secure, too.” “At the end of the day,” he added, “that’s how you can get those cascades of defaults.” After European finance ministers approved the latest installment of Greece’s bailout package Saturday, concerns remained about the troubled nation’s ability to repay its mounting debt, which is projected to total 160 percent of the country’s economic output this year. For many investors and economists, the question isn’t whether Greece will default, but when. The emergency aid extended to Greece is widely seen as a time-buying measure, and not a long-term solution. Greece likely cannot service its debt on its own, with its 10-year paper yielding nearly 16.5 percent, and its two-year debt throwing off more than 26 percent, according to Bloomberg data. But efforts to hammer out a longer-term fix have been stymied. French President Nicolas Sarkozy outlined a plan last week for banks to stretch their short-term Greek debt into long-term bonds, offering Greece some interest-rate relief. But such a plan would impose losses on creditors and would constitute a default, the ratings agency Standard & Poor’s said Monday. If a default were to spark a broader crisis, weaknesses among Greece’s immediate creditors could quickly spread. “If UK banks are exposed to banks in France which are themselves exposed to a bank in Germany, which is then exposed to Greece, that’s another indirect exposure,” said Mervyn King , governor of the Bank of England, during the news conference. “There’s an infinite regress here.” The direct exposure of UK banks to Greece was relatively small at the end of 2010, at about £12 billion at the time, according to the latest figures from the Bank for International Settlements . But indirect exposure potentially dwarfs that figure. If significant damage were to spread other countries’ private sectors, UK banks could face severe strains, suggests a June report from the Bank of England. The banking sector’s claims on the non-bank private sectors of Spain and Ireland combined constitute about half of those banks’ so-called Tier 1 capital, the money banks set aside to cushion against losses, according to the report. As for UK banks’ claims on France and Germany, those together represent about 130 percent of Tier 1 capital, the report says. “You just don’t know all the interbank connections,” said John Whittaker, an economist at Lancaster University Management School. “It’s like when Lehman went down. Nobody knew who was indebted by how much to who else.” The years after the financial crisis have seen a host of weak European banks become even weaker. Now, the credit ratings on Europe’s 100 largest banks span the widest range in 30 years, according to S&P, the Bank of England said. Calculating the total magnitude of the UK’s exposure to a broader meltdown is impossible, King said. Moreover, any crisis would likely be worsened by a broader loss of confidence, affecting a range of institutions, he added. Creditors would flee and markets would likely freeze, heaping pain on beleaguered governments. “There’s a risk that if something went wrong, you may get a drying of liquidity more generally,” said Simon Hayes, chief economist at Barclays Capital. Or put another way, creditors might decide they “simply don’t understand the complexity of the interconnectiveness of these exposures, and just won’t take the risk of lending,” King said at the June 24 news conference. Such a panic would likely affect the world’s strongest economies. If the crisis spreads here, it would likely also touch the United States, said Barwell, the RBS economist. “The price of a whole range of risk assets would fall,” he said. “There are these huge channels that certainly come into play, which won’t get captured by the simple numbers.”

Read this article:
UK Vulnerable To Greece Debt Crisis

Find our Weekly Commercial Real Estate, Private Equity and Fund Newsletters at www.WeeklyBrief.net

{ 0 comments }

Mortgage Refinance | WOJTOWICZ – Real Estate and Mortgage Tips

June 4, 2011

Help is available though the U.S. Small Business Jobs Act, signed a few months ago by President Obama. The new law allows your bank to refinance existing real estate and equipment debt through the U.S. Small Business …

Read the full article →

Ron Gitter: Memo to First Time Buyers: How to Avoid Closing Cost Sticker Shock

June 2, 2011

Chillaxing… After all that hard work to get there, that’s what a first-time buyer should be doing at the closing. Unfortunately, it’s often not the case. Somehow all those closing costs seem much larger than expected. If you listen closely, you can hear the buyer thinking: “Were all those costs properly explained to me at the beginning of the transaction?” But a better result is possible. The Deer in the Headlights Syndrome It never ceases to amaze me how little first-time buyers know about purchasing a home. All the blogs, resource websites and reality TV shows notwithstanding, it’s just plain difficult for a beginner to digest all the facets of a real estate transaction, particularly the costs associated with a closing. Here’s the typical mindset for some first timers: the purchase price, less the gross amount of the mortgage loan, equals the out-of-pocket exposure. Although buyers should be disabused of this notion as soon as possible, that just doesn’t happen as regularly as it should. There are a number of costs that must be identified and explained upfront, but there are two areas that are particularly troublesome: title charges and loan expenses. Being at Peace with Title Charges Condo or home buyers soon learn that there is an important player at the closing table: the title closer representing the “title company.” There may be a few brave souls who purchase real estate without obtaining a title insurance policy, but for almost all buyers, obtaining title insurance is part and parcel of purchasing a home. If a bank is lending money, there is no choice — the purchaser must obtain title insurance for the benefit of the lender. Title insurance, in theory, protects a buyer from third parties who may claim an interest in the property or who may have a lien against it, such as a bank or other creditor. How it Works In order to facilitate the process, soon after the contract is signed, the title company, at the behest of the buyer’s attorney, searches the title and prepares a report of possible “exceptions” or “objections” that must be “cleared” by the seller before closing. If the title company fails to discover a valid lien against the property and insures the title free of such encumbrance, the buyer would be protected down the road against a claim made by the party asserting an interest in the real estate. Whether the title company will be allergic to paying a claim arising under insured title, is a conversation for another time. Here’s the bottom line of the title insurance process: although a closing can’t take place without it, title insurance is expensive. What Are We Talking About? Let’s take a somewhat typical purchase scenario: a $750,000.00 condo, where the buyer is obtaining eighty percent financing (that is, a $600,000.00 mortgage loan). When you add up the mortgage insurance premiums for the buyer and the bank, the various searches, mortgage recording tax (a substantial fee in New York for recording a mortgage that varies by county throughout the state), charges for recording the deed and other related documents, the title bill will add more than $16,000.00 to the buyer’s closing costs. For most first-time buyers, who have no clue that such an enormous expense is in the pipeline, we’re talking about real money. It is essential, therefore, that the title company prepare an estimated title bill as soon as the title order is placed, so that the buyer has sufficient time to adjust his or her expectations of the funds needed for closing. What About Co-ops? Although a version of title insurance is available for co-ops, in the form of “leasehold insurance,” in most cases, only a lien search will be undertaken at a modest cost (approximately $300). Not a big. But both co-ops and condo buyers have to contend with one additional significant expense generator in common: the bank. The Loan Expense Disconnect Due to changes in banking law, a buyer must receive a “good faith estimate” of closing expenses within three business days after the submission of the loan application. This document has become incredibly cumbersome, with potential deal threatening consequences when there are material cost understatement errors on the disclosure form. Although banking reform intended the changes to the “GFE” to inform and protect the consumer, it’s questionable at this point whether the presentation of closing costs on the form confuses rather than helps. More than anything else, however, first-time buyers often do not appreciate the obvious: that those loan expenses itemized on the good faith estimate will be deducted from the gross amount of the loan proceeds at closing. That $600,000.00 loan referred to above, could yield “net proceeds” of as little as $590,000.00, or even less, depending upon a number of factors. How could that happen? Adding up the Costs of Lending There are a number of standard loan expenses that are paid out of proceeds: origination fees, if any (which could total up to three percent of the face amount of the loan), interest for the month in which the closing occurs, soft costs often called “underwriting expenses” or “document preparation” fees, appraisal or other application costs not paid in advance, the legal fee of the bank attorney, mortgage insurance (if required), escrows for real estate taxes and insurance (for condos, but not co-ops) and various other goodies such as flood zone and tax certifications. When you subtract these expenses from the gross loan amount, its takes a toll on the funds that the buyer will actually receive at closing. Mortgage brokers and loan officers dutifully complete and deliver the GFE to the newbie buyer to comply with tighter lending requirements. It’s unclear to me, however, whether sufficient time is taken to explain the numbers contained in that document and the most important reality of getting a loan — it costs money to borrow money. Residential Reality: Crunch the Numbers Early and Often A first time buyer has a lot on his or her plate once the offer is accepted. In addition to pre-contract due diligence, negotiating the contract and navigating the increasingly complicated loan process, getting a grip on closing costs is always a challenge. Making sure that the buyer understands the expected out-of-pocket expenditures in addition to balance due on the purchase price is the sine qua non of a successful transaction and a happy buyer. So here’s a good rule to remember for both the buyer and the professionals involved: when it comes to explaining closing costs to the first-time buyer: once is not enough…

Read the full article →

Europe’s Top Financial Cop: White House Not Doing Enough To Curb Banker Bonuses

June 1, 2011

WASHINGTON — The U.S. isn’t doing enough to curtail excessive banker bonuses, Europe’s top financial regulator told the Obama administration in a recently-disclosed letter. “I think you agree with me that ‘bankers’ bonuses’ is a matter that continues to cause public outrage,” Michel Barnier, the European commissioner overseeing finance, wrote to Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner. “Getting this matter right is key to restoring our citizens’ confidence in the financial system — and ultimately — their confidence in the public authorities regulating the financial institutions.” Lavish compensation paid to traders and bankers during the housing-driven bubble fueled risk-taking at the nation’s largest financial firms, experts have said. Those risks eventually led to the collapse of storied firms, the near-collapse of the financial system and the most punishing economic downturn since the Great Depression. Yet bonuses were never recouped. Individual traders made off with tens of millions of dollars, and chief executives of failed firms and those rescued by taxpayers left with hundreds of millions. To prevent further occurrences, the European Union moved to restrict cash bonuses for executives and risk-takers at banks and other financial institutions. The U.S., however, has been loathe to do so, and is moving slowly in implementing the resulting rules enacted into law last year, charged Barnier, as the Financial Times first reported. U.S. regulators are leaving “too much latitude” to financial firms, which allows them to potentially “circumvent globally-agreed principles,” Barnier wrote to Geithner. Two years ago, leaders of the 20 leading industrialized nations agreed to curb bonus-fueled risk-taking during a summit in Pittsburgh. But while Europe charged ahead with creating hard rules restricting specific pay packages, the U.S. approach gives bank regulators great latitude in determining what’s appropriate — a power such organizations have held since 1995. Regulators have also lumbered along in creating rules designed to rein in risk-taking, having yet to formally implement pay rules lawmakers called for in passing the financial reform bill known as Dodd-Frank. U.S. bank and securities regulators proposed a rule earlier this year that calls for firms to defer at least 50 percent of executive officers’ annual incentive-based pay (commonly known as bonuses) for at least three years. It also seeks to prohibit pay schemes that lead to “excessive” compensation and packages that “could lead to material financial loss.” Regulators will scrutinize the overall design of those packages, rather than individual packages themselves. But since 1995, bank regulators have had the ability to prohibit risky compensation schemes based on the premise that such packages could be an “unsafe and unsound” practice. It’s unclear whether bank overseers at the Federal Reserve, which oversaw institutions like Countrywide; the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, which regulated banks like Citibank; and the Office of Thrift Supervision, which was responsible for AIG and Washington Mutual, ever used that authority to rein in excessive bonuses geared towards short-term profit at the expense of long-term risks. In the new proposed rules, excessive pay won’t necessarily be determined by the dollar amount. Dodd-Frank doesn’t require firms to report “the actual compensation of particular individuals as part of this requirement,” regulators wrote in their proposed rule. However, cash bonuses on Wall Street are down 39 percent since their peak in 2006, according to data compiled by New York’s Office of the State Comptroller. In Europe, banks are restricted by law when doling out cash bonuses, and as much as 60 percent of bonus payouts for “risk takers” and other senior employees must be deferred for at least three years. About half of the pay must be in the form of shares. No such requirement exists in the U.S. “Up front cash bonuses that are based on expected rather than actual performance are a key driver of excessive risk taking,” the European Parliament argues on a page of its website devoted to explaining the new rules. “Staggering payments over time and linking them to the bank’s health and actual performance should ensure that these risks are tackled.” Spokeswomen for Barnier didn’t respond to emailed requests for comment. A Treasury spokeswoman declined to comment. ************************* Shahien Nasiripour is a senior business reporter for The Huffington Post. You can send him an e-mail ; bookmark his page ; subscribe to his RSS feed ; follow him on Twitter ; friend him on Facebook ; become a fan ; and/or get e-mail alerts when he reports the latest news. He can be reached at 917-267-2335.

Read the full article →

Richard Barrington: Money Market Rates Suffer From a Squeeze in Net Interest Margin

May 27, 2011

“Net interest margin” is a phrase that probably doesn’t mean much to you, but right now it is costing you dearly if you have a money market account . You see, net interest margin is a bank accounting measure that indicates how much money banks are able to earn on your deposits. The more banks earn, the more they are inclined to pay their customers in CDs , savings, and money market accounts . Unfortunately, recent financial reports indicate that net interest margin is being squeezed. Understanding net interest margin Bank accounting is complicated — among other things, money taken out of a bank in the form of a loan is considered an “asset” while money deposited into the bank is considered a “liability.” Because of the complexity of bank accounting, there is no one measure that is considered a definitive indicator of bank health and profitability. Instead, bank executives, investment analysts, and regulators look at several different metrics, and one of these is net interest margin. A relatively straightforward form of bank activity is taking money from one customer (a depositor) and lending it to another (a borrower). In order for banks to make money from this kind of activity, the interest rate they receive from borrowers has to exceed the interest rate they pay to customers. The difference between those two interest rates is the net interest margin. Naturally, net interest margin has to be wide enough to cover the overhead involved in both taking care of deposits and making loans, with enough left over to represent a worthwhile profit for the bank. Recent financial reports from two banks illustrate some of the problems banks have had maintaining a healthy net interest margin in the current environment. US Bancorp and Comerica both showed signs of a similar problem recently — they had attracted too much money! Again, bank accounting is complicated. In this case, attracting too much money meant that an influx of new deposits could not be put to productive use, so the net interest margins of these banks suffered. The impact on money market rates While the problems of US Bancorp and Comerica are specific to those two banks, they are reasonably indicative of banking conditions these days. Deposits are easy to come by, while loan activity is slack. You don’t have to understand the intricacies of bank accounting to realize that if deposits are easy to come by, banks are not going to be particularly motivated to pay high interest rates on money market accounts and other deposits in order to attract more. Indeed, because net interest margin is a closely-watched figure, some banks may make a conscious decision to offer uncompetitive money market rates so as not to attract deposits. This is one of the ironies of the economy right now — the recovery is far from robust, and yet there seems to be too much money available. It’s not that there aren’t plenty of people who could use that money, but qualified borrowers are all too scarce in this environment. The condition of too many deposits helps explain why money market rates have continued to decline even while inflation and mortgage rates have increased in recent months. When will money market rates turn around? Keep your eyes on net interest margin for a possible clue. The original article can be found at Money-Rates.com: ” Money market rates suffer from a squeeze in net interest margin”

Read the full article →

Video: RBC’s Fukakusa Says Analysts Expected Higher Trading

May 27, 2011

May 27 (Bloomberg) — Janice Fukakusa, chief financial officer at Royal Bank of Canada, talks about the bank’s second-quarter earnings reported today. Profit at Canada’s largest lender climbed 13 percent, missing analysts estimates. Fukakusa also discusses RBC’s international banking unit and dividend. She speaks with Lisa Murphy on Bloomberg Television’s “Fast Forward.” (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Video: Kennedy Seeks to Make ClearXchange Service `Ubiquitous’

May 27, 2011

May 27 (Bloomberg) — Mike Kennedy, head of payments strategy at Wells Fargo & Co., talks about the bank’s “clearXchange” initiative with Bank of America Corp. and JPMorgan Chase & Co. that allows customers of the three lenders to transfer money using only an e-mail address or cell phone number. He speaks with Betty Liu and Dominic Chu on Bloomberg Television’s “In the Loop.” (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Larry Womack: Sorry, Creditors: I’ve Already Reached My Debt Ceiling

May 26, 2011

The federal government could eliminate around seventy percent of its debt by ending two costly wars, restoring tax rates for the wealthy to their already historically low pre-Bush levels and taking more serious measures to get the economy back on track. But who wants to do all that! Certainly not the House Republicans who control the nation’s purse. Instead, the new Republican majority came into Congress insisting that the bulk of the debt remain untouched, arguing instead that it was time to “get serious about the national debt” by whittling away at the remaining sliver that funds infrastructure, essential services and the social safety net. Sure, their math may stink, but the approach was certainly novel. (So novel, in fact, that Republicans panicked when they realized they might be tricked into accidentally actually passing their own proposals.) If you’re anything like me, you could probably eliminate your personal debt by selling your house and living out of a tent, firing any employees you might have, running or biking to work, never purchasing or doing anything you didn’t absolutely need to survive, canceling your cable and Internet accounts and selling your children to some clean-looking strangers. Given the available options, I would say Congress has it easier. But, if you really are anything at all like me, you’re about as interested in living in a tent as Republicans are in making the insanely wealthy pay real tax rates as high as their maids. (Though for the record, I will cancel my cable the moment networks realize they could be selling their “live” content through TV, IOS and Blu Ray apps like Netflix, Hulu or DivxTV.) So, sucker that you are, you probably intend to take the more conventional approach of generating revenue through work and then trying to live within those means. Rather than adopt an ideology so embarrassingly consistent with simple math, the Republican-run House of Representatives is choosing a third option, even more novel than the last: the get-out-of-debt-free card. With Democrats unwilling to fork over the magic wand that turns 30% into 100% while simultaneously engaging in a good deal of what Newt Gingrich called “radical right wing social engineering,” Republicans are threatening to simply not raise the federal debt ceiling… thereby making payments on the national debt unnecessary until they do! Did you know that we could do this? If this strategy plays half as well with creditors as it does with a deeply, distressingly uninformed public that seems to think that about 90% of the national debt is sitting in the liquor cabinet on Nancy Pelosi’s invisible jet, you and I have just hit the jackpot. I think I’m going to start by calling my bank and telling them that I will no longer be making mortgage payments. Many people are already doing this , of course, but they’re losing their homes and hurting their credit ratings. They must not have explained to the bank that they had reached their personal debt ceilings. I, on the other hand, will inform the bank that there will be no use in foreclosing or doing any sort of violence to my credit rating, since financial penalties actually mean higher real debt, and that doesn’t happen when one has reached his personal debt ceiling. Then I’ll call my credit card companies and tell them not to expect a payment this month. But of course, don’t bother charging me late fees, raising my interest rates or reporting me to the otherwise-appropriate agencies. I’ve reached my personal debt ceiling, after all, and that would all mean much more debt! I’ll probably soon after call the various contractors I am working with and tell them not to expect payment for their work, but please do still deliver the products they are working on. Of course, there will be no sense in filing suit, as I have already reached my personal debt ceiling. And don’t worry about the secondary, tertiary and ongoing repercussions of my failure to pay. Why, if their creditors don’t like it, they can tell them that they’ve reached their debt ceilings, too! Next, I think I’ll call the cable company and tell them to no longer bother sending me a bill. But, of course, don’t even think about shutting off my service; I’ve reached my personal debt ceiling and I’m pretty into Game of Thrones . I should probably call my phone provider to inform them next. They won’t be getting any payments from me in the near future and I can’t have them discontinuing my service with still so many more creditors to call. I especially plan to savor the one to the IRS…. Now that there are no consequences to not paying your bills, there has never been a better time to be a deadbeat in America. Of course, if that doesn’t work out, you can always go into the business of capitalizing on ignorance. That seems to be working out well for some.

Read the full article →

Yen falls against major currencies after comments by the Bank of Japan

May 17, 2011

Yen falls against major currencies after comments by the Bank of Japan

Read the full article →

George Goehl: Illinois Taxpayers Demand that Wall Street Pays Their Fair Share

May 13, 2011

Unwilling to be baited into a false debate about budgets that put all the responsibility on hard-working families, more than 500 Illinoisans joined together to launch Make Wall Street Pay Illinois on Thursday. In the face of Illinois’ $6 billion budget deficit, the state says there is no alternative but to continue to cut mental health services, funding for public education, programs for low-income children and care for seniors. Meanwhile, Wall Street and big banks are foreclosing on hundreds of thousands of Illinois families and neglecting to pay their fair share of taxes. Wall Street and big banks like JP Morgan Chase are projected to cost Illinois taxpayers $7.4 billion dollars alone in costs associated with foreclosures by 2012. Yesterday, in response, protestors in six cities delivered the message to JP Morgan Chase and Illinois elected officials that it is time for Wall Street to end the revenue crisis, create jobs and stop illegal foreclosures. “This isn’t a spending crisis. We’re in a revenue crisis because corporations and the rich aren’t paying their fair share. In fact, they are costing us, and we’re picking up their tab. We don’t want to hear about deficits anymore. We found the money and we’re going to get it back,” said Curtis Smith of Lakeview Action Coalition. “Make Wall Street Pay Illinois” was launched through a series of actions at JP Morgan Chase locations and offices of state legislators in downtown Chicago, Skokie, Homewood, Peoria, Springfield and Bloomington yesterday. The campaign presented a plan to get much-needed money out of the hands of Wall Street and big banks and back in the Illinois state budget: Hold hearings on rotten deals, “Interest Rate Swaps” that overcharge interest to the state and our cities and towns. These rip-offs cost the state budget $88 million per year and our cities and towns hundreds of millions more and we want out. The campaign has an online petition asking Illinois State Attorney General Lisa Madigan to investigate bad deals with banks that cost taxpayers millions that they will hand deliver on May 24th. Pass HB 1810 to enact a $500 fee on banks for foreclosing on homeowners. This would fund mediation programs that would allow 75% of homeowners to modify their loans, stabilize communities and put $20 million back into our state budget. Pass HB 1109 to allow communities to charge fees for bank owned vacant property that is not kept up. These fees can be used to keep up property, reduce crime, stabilize home values, return property taxes to local communities and boost the Illinois economy. Get Illinois out of the ridiculous federal rules that allow corporations to write off costs far in advance of spending them. This corporate welfare costs Illinois as much as $1 billion per year. At J.P. Morgan Chase Bank’s main downtown branch, a group of community leaders were able to enter the bank and secure a meeting with VP James Gilliam before they were escorted out of the bank lobby by police who had set up checkpoints in advance of yesterday’s action. These actions are part of a series of campaigns to ensure that big banks pay their fair share for breaking the economy, stopping passing on costs to taxpayers and simply pay their fair share of taxes. Make Wall Street Pay Illinois is now preparing to send a delegation to the Showdown in Ohio at JP Morgan Chase’s May 17th shareholder meeting in Ohio. For more information, visit www.makewallstreetpayillinois.org

Read the full article →

Bipartisan Group Of Senators Targets Mortgage Servicers

May 13, 2011

WASHINGTON — Unimpressed by the recent efforts of state and federal regulators to rein in the mortgage servicing industry, a bipartisan group of senators led by Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.) and Olympia Snowe (R-Maine) introduced legislation Thursday to make it easier for struggling homeowners to negotiate with their banks. The Regulation of Mortgage Servicing Act would give homeowners seeking mortgage modifications a single point of contact at their bank, end the “dual track” process that lets banks pursue modifications and foreclosures simultaneously and require third-party review before a bank can send a family to foreclosure. In April, federal bank regulators led by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency required the biggest banks to enact reforms nearly identical to those in the Merkley-Snowe bill. Yet Merkley told HuffPost that the OCC’s enforcement action would fail — just like the Obama administration’s voluntary Home Affordable Modification Program, which has so far resulted in more canceled than successful modifications. “Doing this with Olympia is a recognition that neither the reforms pushed by the administration in terms of encouraging the servicers to change habits, nor the settlement with OCC or the [Office of Thrift Supervision] are going to get the job done,” Merkley said. “And so we need to push hard, to say — we need teeth –- ‘You can’t proceed with foreclosure if you have not embraced single point of contact, dual track and third party review.’” Merkley said banks can disobey the regulators with impunity. Of the OCC’s order, he said, “It’s essentially voluntary. It essentially says, ‘Please do these things.’ And the servicer can hire their own person to check on how they’re doing. It hardly hardly constitutes a strong step forward.” The OCC begs to differ. “These orders are not voluntary,” a spokesman said. “They are enforceable through federal district courts, and we can impose penalties of more than $1 million a day for each day the bank is in violation of the order. The orders were signed by all of the directors of each bank, and they are individually subject to these penalties for violations.” As evidence the banks are taking the orders seriously, the spokesman pointed out that one bank — JPMorgan Chase — said it would hire some 3,000 employees to comply. And he said the OCC gets to approve the third-party consultant. Since the housing market collapsed several years ago, banks have made a habit out of repeatedly losing paperwork from desperate homeowners trying to modify their mortgages to avoid foreclosure. And homeowners who successfully start trial modifications are frequently confused and horrified to discover their banks are pursuing foreclosure while the modification process is pending. In some cases , banks even tell homeowners who’ve been making reduced payments as part of trial modification that the reduced payments are causing the foreclosure. “In terms of families calling my office, it’s the exactly the same stories we’ve been hearing for the last two years,” Merkley said. The widely reported abuses have led a coalition of all 50 state attorneys general to launch an ongoing probe that is expected to result in a settlement of some kind. Merkley’s not banking on it. “That is a mirage at this point,” he said, adding that he hoped his bill would put pressure on the state attorneys general. “Until it is signed and delivered, it is a hope.” This story was first reported in HuffPost Hill .

Read the full article →

States Shortchange The Unemployed With Junk Debit Card Fees

May 11, 2011

WASHINGTON — Many states shortchange the jobless by distributing unemployment benefits on debit cards loaded with obnoxious fees, according to a new study by the National Consumer Law Center . Of the 40 states that have switched from paper checks to prepaid debit cards, 22 states’ cards charge ATM fees, 24 charge balance inquiry fees, and 28 charge inactivity fees. The cards in Arkansas, Idaho, Nebraska, Ohio, and Oregon come with overdraft fees ranging from $10 to $20. And in Connecticut, Iowa, Rhode Island, and Tennessee, cardholders “must pay for every ATM inquiry or pay a denied transaction fee if they request cash when their balance is insufficient,” the study says. Tennessee stands out for having the card with the most “junk fees,” the study says. Tennessee’s card, provided by JPMorgan Chase, charges $1 for initial ATM withdrawals, 40 cents for balance inquiries, and 25 cents whenever someone swipes the card at checkout. It’s one of just four states that doesn’t provide even one free ATM withdrawal per deposit. Tennessee doesn’t think its card’s fees are junk. “I’m not sure calling them ‘junk fees’ is a fair statement,” said Jeff Hentschell, a spokesman for the Tennessee Department of Workforce Development, which distributes Tennessee Automated Payment cards for jobless benefits. “When you look at the context of where we were and where we are today, the fees are actually minimal compared to where people were going to cash paper checks before.” Indeed: The NCLC study itself points out that for people without bank accounts, “getting cash from a UC prepaid card will usually be cheaper than paying a check casher to cash a paper check.” Hentschell added his department has a handy website that lays out the fees. As for Chase, the bank says it’s giving states a good deal on a valuable service. “Each state negotiates its own contract and fee structure from numerous bidders,” a Chase spokeswoman said in an email. “To date, states have chosen card solutions that cost government nothing and save taxpayer dollars, selecting their card provider based on the best mix of fees and services to the consumer.” The NCLC study says the Bank of America-issued cards in California and New Jersey are the best, since they offer “free and ample access to cash and transactions with no penalty fees.” The study says close runners-up are Chase’s card in Arizona and Citibank’s in Maryland.

Read the full article →

HSBC Continues Freeze On Home Seizures

May 11, 2011

HSBC North America Holdings, the ninth-largest U.S. bank by assets, told investors Wednesday that the bank’s moratorium on home seizures continues in some jurisdictions and it will be “a number of months” before the bank fully resumes foreclosing on defaulted borrowers. The lender did not specify in filings with federal regulators where it continues to restrict home repossessions or how many borrowers have been affected. HSBC handles more than 892,000 home loans, making it the 12th-largest mortgage servicer in the U.S., according to the Federal Reserve. The foreclosure freeze, which started last autumn, came on the heels of months-long criminal and civil probes by federal and state regulators into lenders’ faulty mortgage practices. The nation’s largest lenders voluntarily halted home repossessions when flawed document practices — like so-called “robo-signing” — came to light and erupted into a nationwide scandal. Officials subsequently found that the nation’s largest mortgage firms illegally seized the homes of at least dozens of borrowers and engaged in shoddy practices that allegedly deceived local courts, broke numerous state laws and federal rules, and short-changed distressed borrowers. HSBC, though, did not halt home seizures until after Nov. 5 , according to its filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Many of its competitors froze new foreclosures a few months earlier. HSBC’s two major U.S. subsidiaries, HSBC Finance Corp. and HSBC Bank USA , disclosed that its moratoria continue in certain parts of the country due to defective foreclosure practices. “We have resumed foreclosures on a limited basis in certain geographies,” the two divisions reported to investors. “It will be a number of months before we resume foreclosures in all jurisdictions as we need to ensure we are satisfied that applicable enhanced processes have been implemented.” HSBC initiated more than 43,000 home foreclosures in 2009 and 2010, according to the Fed. HSBC’s admission underscores the difficulty firms face trying to weed out faulty practices that went on for years before they were recently discovered. By taking shortcuts in processing troubled borrowers’ home loans, the nation’s five largest mortgage firms have saved more than $20 billion since the housing crisis began in 2007, according to a confidential presentation prepared for state attorneys general by the nascent Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection and obtained by The Huffington Post in March . That estimate, which did not measure HSBC’s savings, suggests that the nation’s largest banks reaped tremendous benefits by under-serving distressed homeowners, a complaint that appeared frequently enough that federal regulators finally acknowledged the industry’s fundamental shortcomings and took action. “We have already made several key procedural improvements to enhance our foreclosure processes as a result of our own internal reviews,” HSBC’s U.S.-based units disclosed in securities filings. Spokesmen for the firm did not immediately respond to a request for comment. In April, the lender was one of 14 mortgage firms to be sanctioned for their sloppy practices by the Fed and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency. State attorneys general, Obama administration officials and representatives from the nation’s five largest mortgage firms — Bank of America, JPMorgan Chase, Wells Fargo, Citigroup and Ally Financial — are meeting this week outside Washington, D.C. to discuss standards governing their treatment of delinquent borrowers and remedies for past abuses. Some state and Obama administration officials want to levy fines approaching $30 billion — a few officials want even larger fines. The targeted banks said Tuesday they’d collectively pay $5 billion to settle all claims . Government officials balked at the offer, according to sources involved in the discussions who spoke on the condition of anonymity.

Read the full article →

GBP/USD: Trading the Bank of England Quarterly Inflation Report

May 9, 2011

GBP/USD: Trading the Bank of England Quarterly Inflation Report

Read the full article →

Banks Illegally Foreclosed On Dozens Of Military Borrowers

May 5, 2011

WASHINGTON — Two of the nation’s largest mortgage firms illegally foreclosed on the homes of “almost 50″ active-duty military service members, according to a Thursday report by the Government Accountability Office. The report does not identify the two mortgage companies. GAO investigators attributed the finding to federal bank regulators, who recently completed a three-month probe into allegations of improper foreclosures carried out by the nation’s 14 largest home loan servicers. The GAO report, which focused on problems in the mortgage industry and the lack of federal oversight, is the first official study to feature a partial tally of military families whose homes have been illegally seized. The 50 or so wrongful foreclosures were discovered during regulators’ review of only about 2,800 loans that experienced foreclosure last year. Millions of other foreclosures in recent years have not been reviewed by regulators. More than 2.8 million homes received a foreclosure filing in 2009, and nearly 2.9 million residences got one last year, according to RealtyTrac, a California-based data provider. Federal bank supervisors “could not provide a reliable estimate of the number of foreclosures that should not have proceeded,” they said in their April report on improper mortgage servicing. Two months earlier, the head of the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, which oversees national banks like JPMorgan Chase and Bank of America, said that only a ” small number ” of home seizures should not have occurred. The large number of wrongful foreclosures identified by the GAO from such a small sample suggests that the problem could be more widespread. As foreclosures have surged to record levels, banks and other mortgage firms have been caught ill-equipped to handle the ever-increasing workload, Treasury Department and Federal Reserve officials have repeatedly said. Due to years of under-investment by banks in their mortgage processing operations, regulators and experts have found that shortcuts were taken and procedures were not followed. Homeowners are bearing the brunt of these decisions. Improper mortgage practices affecting military borrowers are ” perhaps the most egregious cases ,” wrote five Democratic lawmakers in a joint letter Thursday to bank regulators. “The idea of wrongfully forcing service members’ families from their homes while their loved ones are risking their lives to protect our country is not only unconscionable, it’s illegal,” said Sen. Al Franken (D-Minn.), one of the co-signers, in an emailed statement. Members of the armed forces on active duty are covered by the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act , a law designed to protect them from financial distress. The legislation restricts foreclosure of properties owned by active-duty members of the military. Violations are handled by the Justice Department’s civil division. The Justice Department has reportedly said it’s investigating allegations of improper foreclosures on service members that were commenced by mortgage subsidiaries of Morgan Stanley and Deutsche Bank AG, two of the world’s largest banks. Bank of America recently announced it would change the way it handles military borrowers. A 50-state coalition of attorneys general and bank supervisors along with the Obama administration are also in talks with the nation’s five largest mortgage firms — Bank of America, JPMorgan Chase, Wells Fargo, Citigroup and Ally Financial — to resolve allegations of wrongful foreclosures and improper mortgage practices. Fines could reach up to $30 billion, according to people familiar with the matter. JPMorgan Chase disclosed in February that it had improperly foreclosed on the homes of 18 military families. Stephanie Mudick, an official at the nation’s second-largest bank by assets, told a House panel that the lender had either rescinded the foreclosure sale or reached a settlement for 12 of those military borrowers, and was working through the rest. The firm’s mistakes were a ” painful aberration ,” Jamie Dimon, JPMorgan’s chairman and chief executive, said in a February statement. In April, the bank agreed to pay $56 million to settle claims of improper mortgage practices when dealing with military borrowers. On Thursday, JPMorgan spokesman Tim Keefe said that the bank had found additional cases of military families whose homes were illegally seized. Although he did not specify the exact number, a separate JPMorgan official said the total was less than 30. Keefe said the bank had committed to providing new homes and full forgiveness of any mortgage debt owed to the lender for these borrowers. By taking shortcuts in processing troubled borrowers’ home loans, the nation’s five largest mortgage firms have saved more than $20 billion since the housing crisis began in 2007, according to a confidential presentation prepared for state attorneys general by the nascent Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection inside the Treasury Department and obtained by The Huffington Post in March . In February, Holly Petraeus, who leads the bureau’s unit overseeing military borrowers, sent a letter to the chief executives of the nation’s 25 largest banks urging them to follow the law when it comes to dealing with service members. “I appreciate your assistance in ensuring that your bank does not overlook its obligations -– legal and otherwise -– to your military customers,” wrote Petraeus, whose husband, David, leads U.S. forces in Afghanistan.

Read the full article →

Video: Prot Says BNP Paribas in a `Fairly Positive’ Position

May 4, 2011

May 4 (Bloomberg) — BNP Paribas SA Chief Executive Officer Baudouin Prot discusses the bank’s first-quarter profit which rose 15 percent, helped by its French and U.S. consumer-banking businesses.

Read the full article →

Video: Holtz-Eakin Says S&P View May Force U.S. to Make Changes

April 19, 2011

April 18 (Bloomberg) — Douglas Holtz-Eakin, president of the American Action Forum, Michael Woolfolk, managing director and senior currency strategy at the Bank of New York Mellon Corp., and Joseph Tanious, vice president of J.P. Morgan Funds, talk about Standard & Poor’s decision to cut its credit rating outlook on the U.S. to “negative” and the potential impact of the move on investors and the fiscal deficit. They talk with Pimm Fox on Bloomberg Television’s “Street Smart.” (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Struggling To Obtain Revenue, Citigroup Profits Plunge

April 18, 2011

Citigroup Inc’s first-quarter profit fell 32 percent, slightly beating expectations, as the bank lost less money on bad loans but struggled to grow its business. The third-largest U.S. bank said on Monday it earned $3.0 billion, or 10 cents per share, down from $4.4 billion, or 15 cents per share, a year earlier. Analysts on average had expected 9 cents per share, according to Thomson Reuters I/B/E/S. Citigroup shares rose about half a percent in premarket trading. They closed down 0.23 percent at $4.42 on Friday. It is the fifth consecutive quarterly profit for Citigroup, which is slowly recovering after taking $45 billion in U.S. bailouts during the financial crisis. By the end of 2010, the government had shed its common shares in Citigroup, and the bank reported its first annual profit since 2007. (Reporting by Maria Aspan; editing by John Wallace) Copyright 2011 Thomson Reuters. Click for Restrictions .

Read the full article →

BofA Hires Former Top SEC Official

April 16, 2011

NEW YORK: Bank of America said it has hired Gary Lynch, a former director of enforcement at the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, to head its legal, compliance, and regulatory relations efforts. Lynch was previously chief legal officer at Morgan Stanley. Like many big banks, Bank of America is dealing with multiple legal and regulatory issues now, including challenges to its procedures for foreclosing on homes and new rules that affect everything from debit cards to retail brokerage. Lynch, who at the SEC brought cases against Ivan Boesky and Michael Milken, is famous for helping banks restore their reputations after legal setbacks. Lynch’s hire is part of a management shake-up by Chief Executive Brian Moynihan that also gave the bank a new chief financial officer, Bruce Thompson. Thompson, currently chief risk officer, will replace Chuck Noski, who will become vice chairman of the bank. Bank of America announced a more than 35 percent decline in first quarter earnings on Friday, hurt by losses in its mortgage unit. (Reporting by Dan Wilchins in New York; editing by Jackie Frank) Copyright 2010 Thomson Reuters. Click for Restrictions .

Read the full article →

Merrill Lynch Uses Large Signing Bonuses To Attract Star Brokers

April 15, 2011

NEW YORK (Joseph A. Giannone) – Merrill Lynch is giving some regional managers permission to offer unusually high upfront signing bonuses to attract top-tier brokers from rivals, according to several recruiters. The second-largest brokerage firm is sweetening elements of a scheme unveiled in January, according to the recruiters who spoke on condition of anonymity. Merrill’s offer, which is likely to be offered to a few dozen brokers, illustrates how difficult it has become to lure stars who have been locked into place through retention packages that pay bonuses over seven years or longer. “There is flexibility on deals for the best of the best,” said a recruiter briefed on the recruiting plan. “Now managers don’t have to ask for an exception.” A spokeswoman at Bank of America, the parent of Merrill Lynch, declined to comment. Terms of the deal are complex, as is often the case with payout grids and recruiting packages. Top-echelon brokers can receive 150 percent of the fees and commissions they generated over the previous 12 months, supplemented by an additional 15 percent if they have attained certain professional designations such as the Certified Financial Planner Board of Standards’ CFP certification. The aggressive package is well above the recent norm of 125 percent of trailing 12-month revenue in upfront cash, the recruiters said. The supplement is not new, but it has been standardized and put in writing for the first time, they said. On the back end, brokers can get 200 percent of their annual production — split evenly between cash and stock — starting after 18 months. Balances would be paid out over the following five years as brokers hit targets for bringing in new client assets. The payouts are not capped. The benchmarks are similar to those outlined in January, but Merrill has extended the deadline for meeting the first asset-gathering hurdle to 18 months, 50 percent longer than in the initial scheme. The deadline for brokers to expand their starting books of business by half as many assets has been extended under the new plan to six-and-a-half years. To collect the full amount of deferred pay, brokers must remain at Merrill for nine years. Managers are also authorized to make offers to “second quintile” brokers at rival firms, with a maximum up-front bonus of 140 percent of trailing 12-month revenue in addition to the certification supplements. Back-end payments for this tier are capped at 350 percent of a broker’s trailing-year revenue at the former firm, a recruiter said. Bank of America on Friday unveiled first-quarter earnings that were below expectations, but bolstered by contributions from Merrill Lynch. Brian Moynihan, chief executive of the bank company, has publicly expressed disappointment with Merrill’s recruiting performance in 2010. The broker-dealer this year has articulated an ambitious plan to expand its brokerage force by a net 8 percent in 2011, or more than 1,200 brokers. In the first quarter, Merrill added 184 advisers, bringing its brokerage force to 15,695, the bank said Friday. That’s down from 16,690 that Merrill boasted in September 2008 when it agreed in the depths of the financial crisis to sell itself to Bank of America. Morgan Stanley Smith Barney is now the number one broker, with more than 18,000 retail advisers. (Reporting by Joseph A. Giannone, editing by Jed Horowitz) Copyright 2011 Thomson Reuters. Click for Restrictions .

Read the full article →

Well Aware Of Bubble, WaMu Boosted Bad Loans, Report Finds

April 14, 2011

NEW YORK — Top executives at Washington Mutual actively boosted sales of high-risk, toxic mortgages in the two years prior to the bank’s collapse in 2008, according to emails published in a wide-ranging Senate report that contradicts previous public testimony about the meltdown. The voluminous, 639-page report on the financial crisis from the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations singles out Washington Mutual for its decision to champion its subprime lending business, even as executives privately acknowledged that a housing bubble was about to burst. “I have never seen such a high-risk housing market,” CEO Kerry Killinger wrote in a 2005 email to his chief risk officer. “This typically signifies a bubble.” Nonetheless, in a series of memos over the next two years, Killinger told board members that the bank should accelerate its subprime portfolio as part of a major growth strategy. The internal memos detailed in the report are a stark contrast to Killinger’s testimony last year before the same Senate subcommittee, where he said that by 2004 the company “quickly determined that the housing market was increasing in its risk, and we put most of those strategies for expansion on hold.” The report finds Washington Mutual continued its aggressive foray into high-risk lending because of the “gain on sale.” When repackaged and sold to investment banks as securities, higher-risk loans would yield more profits for the bank. One chart presented to the bank’s board in 2006 showed that selling subprime loans could generate eight times as much profit as lower-risk, government-backed loans. One of the largest and most aggressive issuers of subprime mortgages in the country, Washington Mutual eventually collapsed in September 2008 — the largest bank failure in U.S. history. It was eventually purchased by J.P. Morgan Chase as part of a deal brokered by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. The FDIC last month sued Killinger and two other top executives at Washington Mutual, accusing them of reckless management of the company and seeking damages in the millions. An attorney for Killinger did not respond to an e-mail seeking comment. The report issued by Sen. Carl Levin (D-Mich.), chairman of the subcommittee on investigations, also excoriated the Office of Thrift Supervision, the government body tasked with regulating Washington Mutual and numerous other failed lenders that aggressively pushed shoddy loans. “Over a five-year period from 2004 to 2008, the (Office of Thrift Supervision) identified over 500 serious deficiencies at WaMu, yet failed to take action to force the bank to improve its lending operations,” the report noted. In several cases, the office impeded investigations by the backup regulator, the FDIC. In one case, in 2006, numerous banking regulators had determined that adjustable-rate mortgages, which had upfront low monthly payments that eventually increased dramatically, were at major risk for default. Regulators issued new guidance to banks, saying they needed to consider the higher interest rates — not the initial “teaser” rates — before approving borrowers for loans. But a summary of a meeting between Washington Mutual officials and regulators showed that the Office of Thrift Supervision viewed the rules as “flexible,” and emphasized “should” instead of “must.” By late 2006, the FDIC discovered that Washington Mutual was not complying with the new standards, but the Office of Thrift Supervision blocked any further FDIC review, refusing to give access to loan files. Using the delay to its advantage, the bank continued to issue billions of dollars of high-risk loans. A 2007 e-mail from Ron Cathcart, the bank’s chief enterprise risk officer, implied that the delay was strategic: new requirements for income verification would cut the volume of new adjustable-rate mortgages by a third. “When WaMu failed in 2008, it was not a case of hidden problems coming to light,” the report concludes. “The bank’s examiners were well aware of and had documented the bank’s high risk, poor quality loans and deficient lending practices.”

Read the full article →

Foreclosure Foul-Up Wins Florida Man a Free Home

April 14, 2011

Amid all the foreclosure horror stories, every now and then we hear about a good outcome, whether it’s by winning a lawsuit through a homestead loophole, because the lender didn’t properly serve the owners, or because it doesn’t really own the mortgage. Or in the case of one underwater Florida homeowner once facing foreclosure, the bank is simply walking away. The house is his, free and clear.

Read the full article →

JPMorgan Increases Profits By Setting Aside Smaller Rainy Day Fund

April 13, 2011

JNEW YORK (By Claire Baldwin) – JPMorgan Chase & Co posted a 67 percent increase in first-quarter earnings, topping Wall Street expectations, as it set aside less money to cover bad loans. But the news was not all positive for the second-largest U.S. bank. It said it was still suffering from high mortgage losses. The bank’s book of consumer loans shrank by 10 percent in the quarter, and loans to companies did not rise enough to offset that. But the results were good enough to lift JPMorgan shares 1.2 percent in premarket trading. JPMorgan is the first of the big banks to post quarterly results, and its earnings often give investors a hint of what to expect from other financial companies. “These were good numbers. They beat estimates, but not massively. I think the financial sector generally is holding up but is not performing quite as well as we would like to see,” said Peter Dixon, an economist at Commerzbank in London. JPMorgan said it earned $5.56 billion, or $1.28 a share, up from $3.33 billion, or 74 cents a share, in the same quarter last year. Wall Street analysts, on average, had expected $1.16 per share. The bank set aside just $1.17 billion to cover bad loans, down from $7.01 billion a year earlier. Chief Executive Jamie Dimon is often credited with skillfully piloting his bank through the financial crisis, but many investors are now looking for signs of revenue growth. In recent quarters, the bank has boosted profit mainly by setting aside less money to cover credit losses, rather than by generating more money from new customers. Pre-provision profit, a measure of how much money the bank earns before accounting for credit losses, fell 20 percent to $9.23 billion. Loans on the bank’s books fell 4 percent to $686 billion, indicating demand for loans is tepid compared with how quickly existing loans are being repaid. “The key is loan growth,” said Adrian Cronje, chief investment officer at wealth management firm Balentine in Atlanta. “That’s what will ultimately turn this recovery into a durable expansion, but it seems like that’s not yet happening.” JPMorgan’s investment banking profits fell to $2.37 billion from $2.47 billion a year earlier. (Reporting by Clare Baldwin; editing by John Wallace) Copyright 2011 Thomson Reuters. Click for Restrictions .

Read the full article →

Citi Ordered To Pay Back Investors For Bad Muni Securities

April 12, 2011

NEW YORK, April 12 (Joseph A. Giannone) – An arbitration panel ordered Citigroup Inc (C.N) to pay a group of investors $54.1 million for losses from municipal securities funds that cratered between 2007 and 2008, the biggest award yet involving the funds in a long series of legal claims against the bank. Three investors — Gerald Hosier, Brush Creek Capital and Jerry Murdock — filed in June 2009, seeking $48.2 million of damages plus other relief related to their losses on three municipal bond arbitrage funds and three ASTA Finance funds sold by Citigroup Global Markets brokers. The ruling, entered Monday, said Citi must pay nearly $34.1 million in compensatory damages. The panel also ordered the bank to pay $17 million in punitive damages, $3 million in lawyer fees and about $80,000 in other costs for an arbitration process spanning 23 hearing sessions since last October. “We are disappointed with the decision, which we believe is not supported by the facts or law, and we are reviewing our options,” Citi spokeswoman Danielle Romero-Apsilos said in an emailed statement. Citigroup sold a series of funds through an entity called MAT Finance LLC; MAT stands for municipal arbitrage trust. These funds borrowed at low short-term rates and invested proceeds in longer-term muni bonds. The strategy backfired when credit markets broke down in 2007, leaving investors with losses of as much as 80 percent. These funds, which were marketed as alternatives to municipal bond funds, are the subject of a U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission probe, and have cost Citi dearly across a number of recent rulings. In February, a Florida panel awarded an investor $6.4 million, which until now was the largest award related to these funds, plaintiff lawyers said. Craig McCann of Securities Litigation and Consulting Group, a firm that provides expert witness testimony for investor litigation, said Citi customers have so far prevailed in 12 out of 13 Citigroup MAT cases and have recovered $70 million. Citi’s shares were up a penny at $4.54 in afternoon trade. There is no guarantee the panel’s decision will be final. Citigroup last fall lost a high-profile case to Larry Hagman, the actor who played J.R. Ewing in the 1980s TV show “Dallas,” and was ordered to pay over $11 million in damages. But the award was appealed by the bank and thrown out in February by a California state judge. That decision has been appealed by Hagman, whose lawyers also represented the Hosier investor group. Hosier is an intellectual property lawyer and a managing partner of Brush Creek, a family investment firm. Murdock is a founder of New York investment firm Insight Venture Partners. (Reporting by Joseph A. Giannone; Editing by Lisa Von Ahn and Gerald E. McCormick) Copyright 2011 Thomson Reuters. Click for Restrictions .

Read the full article →

JPMorgan Accused Of Profiting From Souring Investment, While Clients Lost Millions

April 11, 2011

In newly unsealed court document JPMorgan, the nation’s second largest bank by assets, is accused of profiting from a troubled investment vehicle, while keeping client money in the same failing group of securities. According to documents first unearthed by the New York Times , despite high-reaching concerns at JPMorgan about a structured investment vehicle (SIV) called Sigma, the bank kept client money in the deal and profited off its collapse. The class action suit, filed on behalf of a several pension funds, accuses JPMorgan of earning “substantial fees and interest” and hundreds of millions more from colleteral on short term loans, for total of $1.9 billion. JPMorgan’s clients, the suit argues, lost almost all of the $500 million the bank had invested on their behalf. JPMorgan, the suit argues, breached its fiduciary duty to protect clients’ investments by placing its own interests first, and by failing to disclose information about Sigma’s troubles. The thrust of the argument is that it the bank not only failed to act in the best interests of its clients, but also profited from client losses. The actions of JPMorgan reflect a “blatant disregard of this fundamental duty,” the suit reads. “The undisputed record evidence establishes that JPMorgan knowingly and intentionally enriched itself despite having actual knowledge that its actions would substantially impair the financial interests of the Class.” The suit lays out in detail how JPMorgan, along with a host of Wall Street analysts, allegedly predicted the demise of Sigma. The original complaint documents the warning signs that came before Sigma’s collapse and JPMorgan’s alleged failure to disclose the information to clients with money invested in it. It also emphasizes that the type of investment — a “Securities Lending Agreement” — JPMorgan made on behalf of its clients was supposed to be “conservative.” From the suit: According to the Securities Lending section of JPMorgan’s website, the stated purpose for its Securities Lending Program is to “obtain an attractive return while minimizing risk.” A spokesman for the bank told the New York Times that some of accusations in the suit were “ludicrous” and claimed that JPMorgan did its best to protect clients’ interest in its dealings with Sigma. In one email unearthed in the lawsuit, a JPMorgan executive wrote that the bank was treating its loans to Sigma as “trades” rather than support for the failing investment vehicle. JPMorgan is not the first bank that has been accused of putting its own interests before its clients’. Last year, Goldman Sachs spent $550 million to settle civil fraud charges brought by the SEC, in which the bank was accused of misleading investors and profiting from a group of securities allegedly designed to fail. As a part of the settlement, the bank admitted no wrongdoing, but acknowledged it had “made a mistake” in the disclosures it made to clients. Read the original complaint, filed in Read the full New York Times story for more detail on the case. show_temp

Read the full article →

JPMorgan Chief Gets $19 Million Raise

April 8, 2011

NEW YORK (By By Clare Baldwin and Jonathan Stempel) After piloting the No. 2 U.S. bank through the financial crisis relatively unscathed, JPMorgan Chase & Co Chief Executive Officer Jamie Dimon is now being extremely well rewarded. Dimon’s total compensation jumped nearly 1,500 percent to $20.8 million in 2010 from $1.3 million a year earlier, based on the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s compensation formula, a regulatory filing showed. Dimon did even better in terms of the value of money and shares actually received: his salary, bonus and stock and options from grants made largely in previous years that were actually exercised in 2010 were worth around $42 million. By way of comparison, real median U.S. household income was just $49,777 in 2009, according to the U.S. Census Bureau. Large pay packages for bankers who oversaw transactions that brought the world economy to the brink of collapse in 2008 have become a flash point for investors. Anger has eased, but banker pay remains a sensitive issue, especially toward lenders that took taxpayer bailout money. Many analysts view JPMorgan as the healthiest of the largest U.S. commercial banks, having skirted the worst of the credit losses that hurt many rivals including Bank of America Corp and Citigroup Inc. They credit the 55-year-old Dimon, who became chief executive on December 31, 2005, for having enabled JPMorgan to quickly repay its $25 billion of bailout money. JPMorgan is also one of the first big banks to raise its dividend after passing a second Federal Reserve “stress” test. However, Dimon has criticized regulatory reforms by the Obama administration, saying they could crimp growth. In his annual shareholder letter posted on the bank’s website, Dimon said JPMorgan could earn $22 billion to $24 billion in a “more normal” environment, up from $17.4 billion in 2010. He said profit has fallen short because mortgage losses have been “extraordinarily high,” at $4 billion a year and that such losses will remain “elevated” for a while. THREE YEARS TO SELL HOME Dimon’s 2010 salary remained at $1 million. He was also awarded a $5 million bonus, nearly $8 million in stock awards and $6.2 million in option awards, according to the SEC’s compensation formula. His 2010 compensation also included $579,624 worth of perks, including $421,458 of “moving expenses,” $95,293 to use company aircraft and $45,730 for personal automobile use. Most of the rest went toward home security. Like many Americans who have had trouble selling their homes, Dimon did too. The moving expenses relate to the sale in 2010 of Dimon’s Chicago-area home, in which he had lived while heading Bank One Corp that was sold to JPMorgan in 2004. Dimon put the home up for sale in 2007 when his family moved to New York. Dimon’s total compensation in 2010 fell short of the $35.8 million he was awarded in 2008, according to the SEC formula. Goldman Sachs Group Inc Chief Executive Lloyd Blankfein saw compensation jump to $14.1 million in 2010 from $1 million, another regulatory filing shows. Other bank CEOs had lower compensation in 2010. Wells Fargo & Co’s John Stumpf saw compensation fall to $19 million from $21.3 million. Bank of America’s Brian Moynihan saw compensation fall 70 percent to about $1.9 million, although in early 2011 he got a $9.1 million bonus. Citigroup CEO Vikram Pandit’s compensation was $1 in 2010, but his salary alone has risen to $1.75 million in 2011. JPMorgan shares closed down 0.5 percent at $47.40 on the New York Stock Exchange on Thursday. (Reporting by Clare Baldwin and Jonathan Stempel; editing by Tim Dobbyn, Martin Howell and Dhara Ranasinghe) Copyright 2010 Thomson Reuters. Click for Restrictions .

Read the full article →

Video: Dimon Gets 51% Pay Raise With First Bonus Since 2007

April 8, 2011

April 8 (Bloomberg) — JPMorgan Chase & Co. gave Chief Executive Officer Jamie Dimon a 51 percent raise in 2010 as the bank resumed paying cash bonuses following two years of pressure from regulators and lawmakers to curb compensation. Dimon’s $23 million compensation package makes him the highest-paid chief executive among the top six U.S. banks since 2007, according to the banks’ proxy statements. Bloomberg’s Erik Schatzker reports. (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Largest Village In New York Closes Chase Account To Protest Foreclosures

April 5, 2011

The Village of Hempstead, a relatively low-income, minority-heavy municipality on Long Island, pulled its money out of JP Morgan Chase bank on Tuesday as part of a statewide campaign protesting the bank’s dismal mortgage modification record. “It’s important that Chase and all the big corporate banks start to heed the minority communities,” Hempstead Mayor Wayne Hall said in an interview. “There’s a lot of power in the minority communities. If we all stick together and start withdrawing our money out of these big banks and start putting it into more favorable banks, Chase will review its procedures for modifications.” Nearly one in every four U.S. homeowners with mortgages — or 10.8 million people — currently owe more on their home than it’s worth. In Hempstead, almost 4 percent of homes are in the foreclosure process, according to Dealbook , a rate four times Nassau County average. While data on Chase loans in Hempstead are hard to come by, in nearby New York City, only six percent of the 1,027 borrowers with Chase mortgages who asked for help in the past year were granted a permanent modification, according to a report released recently by the Center for New York City Neighborhoods. Moreover, a full 80 percent of these homeowners have not even received an offer for a loan modification. Chase’s national modification record is not much better. Of 233,653 trial modifications started by Chase under the Obama administration’s Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP) launched in 2009, the bank now has just 71,657 active permanent modifications, according to the latest data from the Treasury Department. One Hempstead homeowner, Maribel Toure, said she has been trying and failing to modify her mortgage loan with Chase bank for two and a half years. “It has been an unhealthy experience, with bad communication and no response,” she told NY Communities for Change, a coalition of working families in low- and moderate-income communities. “I have to work 16-hour shifts in the hospital to make extra money, and I’ve asked for a modification three times, but have gotten no straight answer — I’m stuck in limbo.” A Chase spokesperson said the bank has “served the financial needs of the Village of Hempstead well” for more than 30 years. “In New York, Chase has offered 50,000 modifications to struggling borrowers and has prevented seven foreclosures for every one foreclosure here,” he said. “This past weekend, we met face-to-face with 2,200 borrowers in Brooklyn to help them stay in their homes.” The Village of Hempstead is the first municipality in the country to close a bank account due to foreclosure policies. But a spokesperson for NY Communities for Change said many local governments throughout the state are planning to close their Chase accounts in the coming months. New York City Councilman Jumaane Williams marched into a Park Avenue Chase bank in February to close his account, and major unions have also announced their intention to pull their pension-fund money out of JP Morgan Chase. “Banks like Chase should be ashamed of themselves,” Hempstead Deputy Mayor Henry Conyers said in a press release. “They were bailed out with taxpayer money – now look what they are doing to the taxpayer: foreclosing instead of modifying.”

Read the full article →

Chriss Street: Why Bankers Want a Muni Bond Taxpayer Bailout

April 3, 2011

On May 5, 2009, I testified in front of Barney Frank’s Financial Services Committee that if Congress provided a guarantee of municipal bonds, the United States of America would lose its’ AAA credit rating. Over the next year-and-a-half, I was labeled the “typical Orange County ultra-conservative alarmist” when I spoke at dozens of investment conferences on growing risks of munis to investors. Even as the general market price of long term munis dropped over 20% in the fourth quarter of last year, virtually every major Wall Street investment bank continued to reassure investors that municipal bonds were a great buy. All that hoopla ended yesterday, when Jamie Dimon, the CEO of JP Morgan Chase Bank, acknowledged at a U.S. Chamber of Commerce event in Washington D.C., that hundreds of tax free municipal bonds issues will ” not make it ” and default. Mr. Dimon has intimate knowledge of the municipal bond market, because his firm is the third largest underwriter and issued $47 billion of munis last year. Mr. Dimon added : “I don’t think it’s going to shatter America, I just think it’s a part of the credit cycle.” Mr. Dimon and his bank have obviously sold their municipal bond holdings, but perhaps the timing of the release of this insider’s perspective on a coming market crash has something to do with his bank’s own needs. Currently there are 50,000 municipal bond issuers in America and they have sold over $3 trillion in bonds to mostly individuals, mutual funds and money market funds. A good portion of tax free bond sales were to fund local government worthy projects, such as roads, schools and even city halls. But another huge portion of the money raised in the municipal bond market has gone to support politically connected contractors and other crony capitalists. Mr. Dimon has real insider knowledge of this dark side of the muni market; since his firm in 2009 paid $75 million in penalties and forfeited $647 million to settle SEC charges in an alleged municipal bond kick-back and derivative scam. It seems those nice people at JP Morgan Chase somehow got $3.5 billion in underwriting business after sprinkling $8 million in cash on the friends of elected sanitation officials in Alabama. If one issuer alone could cost a bank almost three quarters of a billion dollars, how much could hundreds of defaults cause the banking industry? And, what if it turns out thousands of these muni deals were tainted by pay to play? How much more could a coming market crash cost the banking industry? Many Americans believe the current financial problems that state and local government are going through are due to high unemployment costs and lower income taxes, but the majority of state and local revenues come from property taxes. If U.S. property tax revenues had risen at the rate of inflation since the start of the real estate bubble in 1996, total property taxes collected this year would have been $296 billion. But collections last year totaled $476 billion, 60% or $180 billion more than inflation. Furthermore, instead of falling back by the 33% plummet in home values since 2006, property taxes rose another 27% or over $100 billion since 2006. The reason for the rising property taxes in this dreadful property market is that local government has been wildly efficient in raising assessed values of property, but incredibly inefficient in cutting values. This has started to create a tax revolt that is growing very rapidly as homeowners are appealing or litigating to drive their property tax bills down. Below is a chart of the State of California projected tax revenues versus budget expenditures. The fastest growing budget cost is snowballing interest and principal payments for municipal bonds. Ten years ago these bond payments were only 3% of the budget, but in two years they will reach 10% of the budget. The State revenue projections shockingly assume property taxes collections do not decline, but a 30% decline in assessed values would cost the state $20 billion. Jamie Dimon is one of the smartest bankers in the world and he fully understands his bank and the rest of the banks are facing a muni bond financial meltdown. The banking industry recently used their money and power to get Congress to stick taxpayers with the $3 trillion bailout of the banks’ busted mortgage loans. The bail-out was so successful for Mr. Dimon, that last year he pocketed a $17 million bonus. I believe Mr. Dimon’s new-found honesty about the risks of municipal bond defaults is part of a strategy to convince Congress to once again saddle taxpayers with a bailout of state and local government. From Mr. Dimon’s perspective, JP Morgan Chase Bank should be about bonuses and taxpayers should be about bailouts.

Read the full article →

Robert Lenzner: Gold, Silver Prices Hit New Peaks on Political Unrest

March 24, 2011

Gold bullion closed at $1438 Wednesday after hitting $1442, and will rise as investors try to protect themselves in a world gone mad with chaos and blood. Silver actually hit a new 35 year peak at $37.19, and getting closer to the $40-$50 goal we set last fall. Gold is no longer just a hedge against QE2 and inflation — or a hedge against deflation. Nor is it a hedge against a declining dollar. Today, gold has become an expression of the instability spreading from Tunisia to Egypt to Libya to Syria, to Yemen, to Saudi Arabia, to Iran, to Bahrain — and those street dissensions to come, conceivably in Kuwait, UAE, and elsewhere. Oil supplies are threatened. Buy gold and silver. You don’t believe? Look at a chart of gold against silver. They are moving in absolute tandem now. Any Sheikh trying to preserve his fortune must own gold and silver. In the US the price of GLD, the largest gold ETF, hit a peak of $140 and looks set to breakthrough that mark tomorrow or the next day. Let’s see if net selling turns into net buying. Are you listening Soros and Paulson, and their camp followers? Then, there’s the WikiLeaks impact on gold and silver. The FT reported a few days ago, via cables released by WikiLeaks, that more central banks are plowing into gold, playing catch up with China, Russia and India. Listen up!. Iran, says the Bank of England via the FT , is making “a significant move… to purchase gold. Likewise, the Qatar Investment Authority, no slouches, and Jordan’s central bank are putting reserves into gold. I must call my friend at the Bank of Israel to find out what he’s doing. I’m sure I won’t get anywhere. Imagine; gold and silver at new peak prices. While oil is only at $106 — high for sure, and going higher in fits and starts, and copper has eased recently as the Chinese reduced their purchases. A shocking development. Goldman Sachs is still bullish.

Read the full article →

PremierWest Bank Announces Appointment of Executive Vice President & Chief Marketing Officer

March 23, 2011

MEDFORD, OR–(Marketwire – March 23, 2011) – PremierWest Bank is pleased to announce the appointment of Ken Wells to the postion of Executive Vice President and Chief Marketing Officer. In this role, Wells leads marketing planning and analysis, brand management, advertising, community relations, media relations, direct marketing, and digital media for the 44 branches of PremierWest Bank, Premier Finance Company and Premier Investment Services, Inc. He serves as a member of the Bank’s Managing Committee.

Read the full article →

World Bank: We Must Rethink Our Role In The Middle East

March 21, 2011

WASHINGTON (Reuters) – The World Bank is rethinking its role in the Middle East and North Africa to tackle economic and social problems that sparked political unrest, the bank’s President Robert Zoellick said on Monday. The poverty-fighting institution needs to find some way to convince resistant governments change is needed, he said. “We have produced a number of flagship reports on governance, youth inequality, quality of education, special disparities, and the noncompetitive nature of the private sector in the region,” Zoellick said in opening remarks at a World Bank conference on Arab issues. “But the record of action has been spotty. Like others, we also have much to learn,” he added. The conference, held at the bank’s Washington headquarters and carried live on the Internet, brought together journalists, think tanks, youth and women groups, and academics from the Arab world to discuss changes taking place across the region. Protests against political repression, corruption, high unemployment and a rising cost of living toppled rulers in Egypt and Tunisia and spurred uprisings in Yemen, Bahrain, Morocco, Jordan, Algeria, Saudi Arabia, Syria and Libya. The changes have forced institutions like the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund to take a harder look at their roles amid criticism they supported economic and development policies of authoritarian governments that worsened poverty and unemployment. Zoellick said part of the process of modernizing multilateral institutions was to learn from mistakes. “The challenge we have as an institution is when a government resists, how do we engage?” he told reporters. “Some people say pull back, don’t do anything, but often there are opportunities to … make a difference,” he added. Zoellick said such issues need to be debated by World Bank member countries who fund the institution and meetings of the World Bank and IMF in mid-April present an opportunity to address ways the bank can support the transitions. In the near-term, Zoellick said he worried about high expectations for change at a time when global food prices are rising, adding to the fiscal burden of countries in the region that import most of their food. LEARNING FROM HISTORY He said while there may be a tendency to want to forget the past, there were important lessons “not necessarily to be choked by them but to understand what questions to ask going forward”. “In order to identify and explore these issues, we need first and foremost to open up a genuine and deep dialogue with and between the different voices in the region,” Zoellick told the conference. “They are issues that will not go away simply because one government fell, or one leader replaced another.” Samer Shehata, a professor at the Center for Contemporary Arab Studies at Georgetown University, told Reuters revolutions in Tunisia and Egypt were reactions against economic and social policies championed by the World Bank and IMF. “In many ways the Tunisian and Egyptian revolutions were against neo-liberal economic policies that were merciless on poor people because they bet on the future,” Shehata said, pointing at the 14.4 percent unemployment rate in Tunisia. Shehata said the institutions needed to change the methods they use to evaluate development and progress in the region, and should not sidestep sensitive political questions. “They need to focus on the vast majority of the population and their living conditions, and also political issues like how good is the quality of institutions, is there political participation, and are elections free and fair,” he said. “It can’t just be simply about rates of growth.” (Editing by Padraic Cassidy and Andrew Hay) Copyright 2011 Thomson Reuters. Click for Restrictions .

Read the full article →

Central Bancorp, Inc. Appoints Gerald T. Mulligan to Board of Directors

March 18, 2011

SOMERVILLE, MA–(Marketwire – March 18, 2011) – Central Bancorp, Inc. ( NASDAQ : CEBK ) (the “Company”), the parent company of Central Co-operative Bank (the “Bank”), today announced that Gerald T. Mulligan has been appointed as a member of the Board of Directors of the Company and the Bank.

Read the full article →

Video: Lawyers Say Gupta Tapes Not Enough for Galleon Charges

March 18, 2011

March 18 (Bloomberg) — A 2008 conversation between then-Goldman Sachs Group Inc. Director Rajat Gupta and Galleon Group LLC co-founder Raj Rajaratnam about the bank’s talks on buying Wachovia Corp. or AIG Inc. isn’t enough to support prosecuting Gupta for insider trading, several lawyers said. Bloomberg’s Erik Schatzker reports. (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Gretchen Morgenson: Attorneys General May Be Rushing Proposal for Loan Servicers

March 13, 2011

ONE crucial reason the nation’s mortgage industry ran itself — and the entire nation — off the rails was its obsession with speed. Mortgages had to be approved chop-chop, loans pooled instantly. When it came to foreclosure, well, the quicker the better. So it is disturbing that the same need for speed is at work in the bank settlement being devised by state attorneys general relating to improper loan-servicing and foreclosure practices.

Read the full article →

Mary Bottari: WI Firefighters Spark "Move Your Money" Moment

March 12, 2011

On the day that the bill passed the Wisconsin Assembly effectively ending 50 years of collective bargaining in Wisconsin and eviscerating the ability of public unions to raise money through dues, a new front opened in the battle for the future of Wisconsin families. Bagpipes blaring, hundreds of firefighters walked across the street from the Wisconsin Capitol building, stood outside the Marshall and Ilsley Bank (M&I Bank) and played a few tunes — loudly. Later, a group of firefighter and consumers stopped back in at the bank to make a few transactions. One by one they closed their accounts and withdrew their life savings, totaling approximately $190,000. After the last customer left, the bank quickly closed its doors, just in case the spontaneous “Move Your Money” moment caught fire. The sedate, old fashioned M&I Bank on the Capitol Square has gained some notoriety in recent weeks. Oddly, a tunnel in the M&I parking garage links to the capitol basement. Dubbed the “rat hole to the Walker palace” , the tunnel was used by Governor Scott Walker to ferry lobbyists into the capitol building to hear his budget address during a time when the capitol was in a virtual lock down in defiance of a court order and after Sheriffs has quit the building refusing to be a “palace guard.” Now the bank is getting caught up in the controversy again. Word is beginning to spread that M&I is one of Walker’s biggest backers. Top executives at M&I Bank have long been boosters of Walker. M&I Chief Executive Dennis Kuester and his wife gave $20,000 to Walker in recent years. When you package individual and PAC contributions by employers, M&I is number one — at $57,000 dollars. The firm apparently uses a conduit to bundle much of its money to Walker. Flyers, webpages, and Facebook sites have popped up encouraging WI consumers to boycott Walker campaign contributors and “Pull the Plug on M&I Bank.” Other banks whose employees have donated large sums to Walker, such as Associated Bank and North Shore Bank may also be seeing their customers soon. Economic Transparency Joe Conway, President Madison Fire Fighters Local 311, explained to CMD that the action was totally spontaneous, but that “economic transparency” was going to be a big theme in the fight ahead. “Groups will be sending letters to Walker’s major donors giving them the opportunity to support the teachers, firefighters and police in their community.” Conway is well aware that new polling shows that 74% of Wisconsin families support collective bargaining rights for public workers. Two of these letters are already in the mail to M&I Bank and Kwik Trip. “The undersigned groups would like your company to publicly oppose Governor Walker’s efforts to virtually eliminate collective bargaining for public employees in Wisconsin. In the event that you cannot support this effort to save collective bargaining, please be advised that the undersigned will publicly and formally boycott the goods and services provided by your company,” the letter says. “However, if you join us, we will do everything in our power to publicly celebrate your partnership in the fight to preserve the right of public employees to be heard at the bargaining table.” The letters are signed by the heads of the Wisconsin Professional Police Association, the Professional Fire Fighters of Wisconsin, the International Association of Fire Fighters Local 311, Madison Teachers Inc., Dane County Deputy Sheriffs Association and the Madison Professional Police Officers Association. Just the Beginning Walker’s list of campaign contributors is already in wide circulation on websites like “Scott Walker Watch” and fast-growing Facebook pages like “Boycott Scott Walkers Contributors” . These grassroots efforts are backed up by solid names and numbers extracted from the Wisconsin Democracy Campaign (WDC) database, a nonpartisan, nonprofit organization that tracks money in politics. The WDC data shows that Walker’s major contributors include a diversity of national and state-based firms including Koch Brother Industries, AT&T, Walmart, John Deere Tractor, Johnsonville Brats, Miller/Coors, Kwik Trip, Sargento Cheese, and SC Johnson & Sons (producers of Windex, Glade, Pledge etc). The letter writing effort is being undertaken not to put people out of work, but to encourage workers to let their bosses know it is time to reconsider their support for Walker’s newly revealed radical agenda. Sam Hokin, a Wisconsinite and small businessman who started the Facebook page in the early days of the protest, put the strategy bluntly: “The only thing the Republicans care about is money. The only way you can touch them is through their revenue. They don’t care about signs and protesters. They don’t care about the opinion of the majority of the people in the state, their bottom line is money.” Unions, pension funds, cities and counties and average consumers bank at these banks and support these firms by buying their products and services. They have tremendous clout in Wisconsin’s small economy. Greatest Heist in History Wisconsin workers are keenly aware that they are part of a historic push back that is spreading from state to state. After $14 trillion dollars of housing wealth, wages and retirement savings were taken from the middle class during the 2008 financial collapse, workers are being asked to take it on the chin again. Michael Moore put it best: “We aren’t broke. Wisconsin is not broke. The country is awash in wealth and cash. It’s just that it’s not in your hands. It has been transferred, in the greatest heist in history, from the workers and consumers to the banks and the portfolios of the über-rich.” M&I Bank is in the process of being bought by a Canadian bank. It took $2 billion in TARP bailout money from the taxpayers and have yet to pay it back. “They [state Republicans] came in like the Grim Reaper to drive a knife into the heart of labor,” yelled Jim Garity at a recent rally. Garity is a unionized Jefferson County Highway Department worker and leader. “But we are going to stand and we are not going to bleed. Governor Walker’s plan is to give more money to Wall Street, but we are going to take back our money from Wall Street and put Main Street to work!” Walker’s recent moves include over $200 billion in tax cuts for corporations while stripping $1 trillion from Wisconsin schools and local governments. The “take it back” movement is gaining steam. At the federal level, AFL-CIO, SEIU are joined by consumer groups in a fight to apply a small financial transaction tax to damaging Wall Street speculation in order to recoup over $100 billion dollars a year for job creation and other essential needs. It’s About Power Walker’s collective bargaining bill not only seeks to gut a 50 year tradition in the state where public unions started, but by doing away with automatic check off for union dues he seeks to cripple the the ability of public sector unions to hire employees to organize, grow and be a force in Wisconsin politics. State Senate Majority Leader Scott Fitzgerald, one of Walker’s closest allies in the legislature, admitted as much to FOX News. “If we win this battle, and the money is not there under the auspices of the unions, certainly what you’re going to find is President Obama is going to have a much difficult, much more difficult time getting elected and winning the state of Wisconsin,” said Fitzgerald. While some hold out hope for a general strike and vigorous recall efforts are underway, others remain focused on leveraging the power of the “sleeping giant” to force Walker to back down and to prevent devastating cuts to schools and municipalities. Stay tuned. This fire might be hard to contain. The Madison-based Center for Media and Democracy has been reporting live from the Wisconsin Capitol for four weeks. Learn more at our website PRWatch.org .

Read the full article →

Rising inflation pushes the Bank of Korea to increase the rates by 25 basis points in March 

March 10, 2011

Rising inflation pushes the Bank of Korea to increase the rates by 25 basis points in March

Read the full article →

Ellen Brown: How Wisconsin Can Turn Austerity Into Prosperity: Own a Bank

March 7, 2011

Public sector man sitting in a bar: “They’re trying to take away our pensions.” Private sector man: “What’s a pension?” – Cartoon in the Houston Chronicle As states struggle to meet their budgets, public pensions are on the chopping block, but they needn’t be. States can keep their pension funds intact while leveraging them into many times their worth in loans, just as Wall Street banks do. They can do this by forming their own public banks, following the lead of North Dakota — a state that currently has a budget surplus. Public workers are not going quietly into that good night of state budgets balanced at the expense of union benefits. After three weeks of protests in Wisconsin, convictions remain strong and pressure is building. Fourteen Wisconsin Democratic lawmakers said Friday that they are not deterred by threats of possible arrest and of 1,500 layoffs if they don’t return to work. President Obama has charged Wisconsin’s Governor Scott Walker with attempting to bust the unions. But Walker’s defense is: “We’re broke. Like nearly every state across the country, we don’t have any more money.” Among other concessions, Governor Walker wants to require public employees to pay a portion of the cost of their own pensions. Bemoaning a budget deficit of $3.6 billion , he says the state is too broke to afford all these benefits. Broke Unless You Count the $67 Billion Pension Fund . . . That’s what he says, but according to Wisconsin’s 2010 CAFR (Comprehensive Annual Financial Report), the state has $67 billion in pension and other employee benefit trust funds, invested mainly in stocks and debt securities drawing a modest return. A recent study by the PEW Center for the States showed that Wisconsin’s pension fund is almost fully funded, meaning it can meet its commitments for years to come without drawing on outside sources. It requires a contribution of only $645 million annually to meet pension payouts. Zach Carter, writing in the Huffington Post, notes that the pension program could save another $195 million annually just by cutting out its Wall Street investment managers and managing the funds in-house. The governor is evidently eying the state’s lucrative pension fund, not because the state cannot afford the pension program, but as a source of revenue for programs that are not fully funded. This tactic, however, is not going down well with state employees. Fortunately, there is another alternative. Wisconsin could draw down the fund by the small amount needed to meet pension obligations, and put the bulk of the money to work creating jobs, helping local businesses, and increasing tax revenues for the state. It could do this by forming its own bank, following the lead of North Dakota, the only state to have its own bank — and the only state to escape the credit crisis. This could be done without spending the pension fund money or lending it. The funds would just be shifted from one form of investment to another (equity in a bank). When a bank makes a loan, neither the bank’s own capital nor its customers’ demand deposits are actually lent to borrowers. As observed on the Dallas Federal Reserve’s website , “Banks actually create money when they lend it.” They simply extend accounting-entry bank credit, which is extinguished when the loan is repaid. Creating this sort of credit-money is a privilege available only to banks, but states can tap into that privilege by owning a bank. How North Dakota Escaped the Credit Crunch Ironically, the only state to have one of these socialist-sounding credit machines is a conservative Republican state. The state-owned Bank of North Dakota (BND) has allowed North Dakota to maintain its economic sovereignty, a conservative states-rights sort of ideal. The BND was established in 1919 in response to a wave of farm foreclosures at the hands of out-of-state Wall Street banks. Today the state not only has no debt, but it recently boasted its largest-ever budget surplus . The BND helps to fund not only local government but local businesses and local banks, by partnering with the banks to provide the funds to support small business lending. The BND is also a boon to the state treasury. It has a return on equity of 25-26% , and it has contributed over $300 million to the state (its only shareholder) in the past decade. This is a notable achievement for a state with a population less than one-tenth the size of Los Angeles County. In comparison, California’s public pension funds are down more than $100 billion — that’s billion with a “b” – or a third of the funds’ holdings, following the Wall Street debacle of 2008. It was, in fact, the 2008 bank collapse, not overpaid public employees, that caused the crisis that shrank state revenues and prompted the budget cuts in the first place. Seven States Are Now Considering Setting Up Public Banks Faced with federal inaction and growing local budget crises, an increasing number of states are exploring the possibility of setting up their own state-owned banks, following the North Dakota model. On January 11, 2011, a bill to establish a state-owned bank was introduced in the Oregon State legislature ; on January 13, a similar bill was introduced in Washington State ; on January 20, a bill for a state bank was filed in Massachusetts (following a 2010 bill that had lapsed); and on February 4, a bill was introduced in the Maryland legislature for a feasibility study looking into the possibilities. They join Illinois , Virginia , and Hawaii , which introduced similar bills in 2010, bringing the total number of states with such bills to seven. If Governor Walker wanted to explore this possibility for his state, he could drop in on the Center for State Innovation (CSI), which is located down the street in his capitol city of Madison, Wisconsin. The CSI has done detailed cost/benefit analyses of the Oregon and Washington state bank initiatives, which show substantial projected benefits based on the BND precedent. See reports here and here . For Washington State, with an economy not much larger than Wisconsin’s, the CSI report estimates that after an initial startup period, establishing a state-owned bank would create new or retained jobs of between 7,400 and 10,700 a year at small businesses alone, while at the same time returning a profit to the state. A Bank of Wisconsin Could Generate “Bank Credit” Many Times the Size of the Budget Deficit Economists looking at the CSI reports have called their conclusions conservative. The CSI made its projections without relying on state pension funds for bank capital, although it acknowledged that this could be a potential source of capitalization. If the Bank of Wisconsin were to use state pension funds, it could have a capitalization of more than $57 billion – nearly as large as that of Goldman Sachs . At an 8% capital requirement, $8 in capital can support $100 in loans, or a potential lending capacity of over $500 billion. The bank would need deposits to clear the checks, but the credit-generating potential could still be huge. Banks can create all the bank credit they want, limited only by (a) the availability of creditworthy borrowers, (b) the lending limits imposed by bank capital requirements, and (c) the availability of “liquidity” to clear outgoing checks. Liquidity can be acquired either from the deposits of the bank’s own customers or by borrowing from other banks or the money market. If borrowed, the cost of funds is a factor; but at today’s very low Fed funds rate of 0.2%, that cost is minimal. Again, however, only banks can tap into these very low rates. States are reduced to borrowing at about 5% — unless they own their own banks; or, better yet, unless they are banks. The BND is set up as “North Dakota doing business as the Bank of North Dakota.” That means that technically, all of North Dakota’s assets are the assets of the bank. The BND also has its deposit needs covered. It has a massive, captive deposit base, since all of the state’s revenues are deposited in the bank by law. The bank also takes other deposits, but the bulk of its deposits are government funds. The BND is careful not to compete with local banks for consumer deposits, which account for less than 2% of the total. The BND reports that it has deposits of $2.7 billion and outstanding loans of $2.6 billion. With a population of 647,000, that works out to about $4,000 per capita in deposits, backing roughly the same amount in loans. Wisconsin has a population that is nine times the size of North Dakota’s. Other factors being equal, Wisconsin might be able to amass over $24 billion in deposits and generate an equivalent sum in loans – over six times the deficit complained of by the state’s governor. That lending capacity could be used for many purposes, depending on the will of the legislature and state law. Possibilities include (a) partnering with local banks, on the North Dakota model, strengthening their capital bases to allow credit to flow to small businesses and homeowners, where it is sorely needed today; (b) funding infrastructure virtually interest-free (since the state would own the bank and would get back any interest paid out); and (c) refinancing state deficits nearly interest-free. Why Give Wisconsin’s Enormous Credit-generating Power Away? The budget woes of Wisconsin and other states were caused, not by overspending on employee benefits, but by a credit crisis on Wall Street. The “cure” is to get credit flowing again in the local economy, and this can be done by using state assets to capitalize state-owned banks. Against the modest cost of establishing a publicly-owned bank, state legislators need to weigh the much greater costs of the alternatives – slashing essential public services, laying off workers, raising taxes on constituents who are already over-taxed, and selling off public assets. Given the cost of continuing business as usual, states can hardly afford not to consider the public bank option. When state and local governments invest their capital in out-of-state money center banks and deposit their revenues there, they are giving their enormous credit-generating power away to Wall Street.

Read the full article →

Matt Kepnes: How to Save Money for Your Next Trip

March 6, 2011

Most people never make the leap into extended travel because they don’t think they can afford it. They envision needing tens of thousands of dollars to travel well — a daunting number to save for most. I remember when I began saving for my first trip around the world. I got a rough estimate of how much money I thought I needed and thought, “Woah. How will I ever save that much?” If you also fall into that same category of thought, here are some tips for saving money for your trip around the world: Eat In! Eating out is easily a big expense for almost everyone. Instead of having $10 lunches and $20 dinners, brown bag it to work and cook dinner at night. Even if you still go out once a week, a person can survive on groceries for around $60 per week. That’s a lot less than eating out every meal. This is the biggest D’uh! Tip, and while it may be inconvenient to cook all the time, the truth is that if you really want to supercharge your savings, changing your eating habits is the best way to do it. Cut the Coffee . Love your Starbucks? Well, Starbucks doesn’t love you or your bank account. Your daily cup of coffee averages out to $150 per month ($5 for a coffee). That’s enough money to travel around Southeast Asia for a week! If you drink more than one cup of coffee a day just think of quickly it all adds up. Give up coffee, switch to tea, or brew your own java. Coffee is the little thing that quietly drains your bank account without you ever noticing. Drink Less . Alcohol is expensive. Heck, even on the road, the biggest money suck is usually a night out. It may not be appealing to spend nights inside and not out with your friends, but spending a hundred dollars or more a week will really add up. Try to cut down on your evenings out. Have friends over, see a movie, watch TV, create a travel blog, or read a book. It’s not exciting but the goal is worth the sacrifice. And if you aren’t a big “going out” person, you’re already half way there! Lose the Car . Cars cost a lot of money. If you can, get rid of yours. You ‘re probably spending hundreds of dollars each month on gas and insurance. That money can be used while abroad and it’s not like you are going to need your car when you’re backpacking India. Learn to love the bus, ride the subway, or walk. It might not be feasible to get rid of your car completely, but you can certainly cut down on the amount of driving that you do. Not having a car may be inconvenient or make your commute longer, but it will save you lots of money. Plus, walking is good exercise after all. Move Out! Get rid of that apartment or bring in some roommates. Lowering your housing costs will allow you to see huge gains in your savings. If you can, try to move in with mom and dad. Then you’ll have no housing costs! It may kill your social life but, hey, a social life costs money anyways and you’re trying to save. If moving in with the folks isn’t an option, bring in a roommate instead. Turn your living room into a spare room and have a housemate! If you’re spending hundreds per month on rent, cutting that in half or reducing it to zero will give you the biggest whole number jump in your bank account. Switch Your Bank! This is more a tip for the road but it still helps. Get a bank account at Bank of America and use their ATM partners to avoid ATM fees when you travel . Get HSBC and use their worldwide ATMs and avoid fees. Get a Capital One account and never pay fees. Fees just drain money out of your bank account. Moreover, in Schwab Bank has no ATM fees at all. As you can see, there are many ways to avoid bank fees! Get a New Credit Card . Get a travel credit card that gives you free money, free rooms, or free flights. It’s less money you’ll have to spend later on. Travel credit cards usually give you huge sign up bonuses and they provide easy ways to rack up frequent flier miles, which can give you free flights or get you into business class. I received over 100,000 miles last year from credit card bonuses. Get a High Yield Savings Account . Now that your savings is going up, make it work for you. Don’t leave it in a savings account where you get .5% a month. Even though interest rates are low, you can still get 2% with some accounts. Get an online money market and actually make some money. It won’t be a lot but a little free money is better than no free money. For online banks, I like Emigrant Direct. Capital One and Discover bank also offer good rates. Keep the Change. One thing that really helped me save money quickly when I was saving for my trip was putting my change aside. At the end of every day, I put my change into a giant container. By the end of the year, my change had accumulated into over $500 USD. That’s a lot of change. I knew a friend who used to do it with dollar bills and had over $1,000. Everyday we “bleed” money. Stopping that bleeding can get us a lot of savings that we can use for travel. While most of these tips might have you living like a hermit, the real way to save money is to not spend it. You’ll want to have some excitement in your life while you’re home, but the trick is to find the cheap alternative. Moreover, you should always make your money work for you. When I was home, I invested my savings, I used high interest savings accounts, cash back cards; whatever it took because every extra dollar was more money on the road. At the end of the day, the more you save, the longer you can be on the road. Matthew Kepnes has been traveling around the world for the past 4.5 years. He runs the award winning budget travel site, Nomadic Matt’s Travel Site . For more information, you can visit his Facebook page or sign up for his RSS feed .

Read the full article →

Richard Barrington: Help! What Should I Do With My Deposits With All These Banks at Risk?

March 2, 2011

Q: I saw an article recently saying that the number of banks in financial trouble was at the highest level in 18 years. I have a money market account and a checking account; how concerned should I be about their safety? How can I find out if my bank is on the list of troubled banks? A: The FDIC releases periodic reports on the financial conditions of banks, and the report for the fourth quarter of 2010 revealed that 884 banks are now on the FDIC’s list of problem banks. This represents about 11.5 percent of all FDIC-insured banks. That’s bad enough, but since the FDIC doesn’t reveal the identity of the problem banks, this situation can create uneasiness for all bank customers. Of course, the reason the FDIC keeps its list confidential is that naming names would cause an immediate run on those troubled banks, effectively scuttling any attempt to save them. That’s good for the banks, and potentially good for the banking system as a whole. But what should individual banks customers do? Here are a couple of suggestions: Stay squarely within FDIC deposit insurance limits. The $250,000 insurance limit applies across multiple accounts at any one institution, so if you have savings accounts, money market accounts , CDs and/or checking accounts with any one bank, you may want to split them up if necessary to keep the total under $250,000. Be alert for signs of trouble at your bank. MoneyRates.com recently published an article listing seven signs that your bank may be in trouble . In 2009, it was the big banks that were most likely to fail. More recently, it has been the turn of the smaller banks, but the market is so diverse that it is dangerous to make any generalizations. Relying on FDIC insurance and keeping your eyes open for signs of trouble may be the best a depositor can do. The original article can be found at Money-Rates.com: ” Ask the expert: what to do with money market accounts and other deposits with more banks at risk ”

Read the full article →

Ex-Goldman Sachs Board Member Accused Of Insider Trading

March 1, 2011

Goldman Sachs former director Rajat K. Gupta has been charged with insider trading by the Securities and Exchange Commission , for allegedly giving a hedge fund manager secret information about the bank’s financial health. Gupta, who left the Goldman board of directors last year, has been accused of participating in a $18 million insider trading scandal. He allegedly tipped off indicted Galleon Group founder Raj Rajaratnam twice in 2008, allowing the hedge fund to reap millions. The case is the latest example of the SEC’s ramped-up effort to root out insider trading, and it constitutes a significant embarrassment for Goldman Sachs. Gupta told Rajaratnam that Goldman was in better shape than expected, before second quarter earnings were announced in 2008, the SEC says. He also told the hedge fund manager that Warren Buffet’s company Berkshire Hathaway was investing $5 billion in the bank, before that information was made public, according to the SEC’s complaint. Gupta, who was formerly the head of consulting giant McKinsey & Co., also sat on the board of directors of Procter & Gamble, and he stands accused of passing Rajaratnam secret information about that company as well. The SEC previously charged Rajaratnam with insider trading. The billionaire hedge fund manager has pleaded not guilty. After it came out last spring that the government was examining whether Gupta had shared secret information , Gupta left the Goldman board. From Robert Khuzami, the SEC’s director of enforcement: “Gupta was honored with the highest trust of leading public companies, and he betrayed that trust by disclosing their most sensitive and valuable secrets.” READ the complaint below: 33-9192

Read the full article →

Bernie Madoff: ‘I’m A Good Person’

February 28, 2011

Bernie Madoff’s personal PR campaign has begun. The convicted ponzi schemer made a series of calls from prison to writer Steve Fishman in hopes of setting the record straight — and to potentially “get a message” across to his estranged son, Andy Madoff, according to a new article in New York magazine. He apologized for calling collect. “I don’t have that much money in my commissary account,” he said. Madoff is serving a prison sentence of 150 years for running the largest recorded Ponzi scheme in history, one that had a direct effect on thousands of investors and a host of charities and hedge funds. The collective investment of $36 billion in Madoff’s scheme returned only $18 billion to investors before the financial collapse. And while there is still debate about where the other $18 billion exactly landed, much of it believed to have gone to Madoff. Madoff appears to have spent the better part of the interviews defending his actions, stopping short of excusing himself entirely. “I am a good person,” Madoff says. “I’m not the kind of person I’m portrayed as.” He also believes others are less innocent than they appear. “Everyone was greedy,” he explains, “I just went along.” He also notes that not everyone left empty-handed: “I’m sure it’s a traumatic experience to some, but I made a lot of money for people.” Madoff again had some choice words about Wall Street. In February, in his only other interview, Madoff said banks and hedge funds “had to know… But the attitude was sort of, ‘If you’re doing something wrong, we don’t want to know.” JPMorgan Chase, Madoff’s bank, has come under scrutiny for its alleged role in the Ponzi scheme. Trustee Irving Picard is suing the bank for $6.4 billion on behalf of scammed investors. His lawyer, David Sheehan, says the bank was “willfully blind” to the scheme and played a direct role in abetting Madoff’s scheme by ignoring “red flags,” while collecting fees and profits. Picard has also sued Citigroup for $425 million, alleging the bank knowingly passed Madoff’s dirty money onto other banks. This time, he went farther, admitting the market exploits individual investors. “There’s no chance that investors have in this market,” he says. During the interview, he also expresses surprise that no one else on Wall Street has seen criminal convictions. Regulatory reform, he believes, didn’t go far enough. His stated reason for calling Fishman, though, had more to do with his estranged son, Adam, than with Wall Street. Madoff hasn’t spoken to Adam since his other son, Mark, committed suicide on the second anniversary of the Madoff’s arrest in downtown Manhattan. Through the interview, he hopes to reach his son, against his lawyer’s advice. Since the Mark’s suicide, Madoff has also lost contact with his wife, Ruth Madoff. Read the entire piece here.

Read the full article →

Video: Grodzki Says HSBC Bracing for ‘Tougher Climate’ in Asia

February 28, 2011

Feb. 28 (Bloomebrg) — Georg Grodzki, head of credit research at Legal & General Investement Management, talks about HSBC Holdings Plc’s full-year profit and the outlook for the bank’s operations in Asia. He speaks with Maryam Nemazee on Bloomberg Television’s “The Pulse.”

Read the full article →

FOREX CENTRAL BANK WATCH: ECB Interest Rate Expectations at 14-month Highs Ahead of CPI Data

February 28, 2011

FOREX CENTRAL BANK WATCH: ECB Interest Rate Expectations at 14-month Highs Ahead of CPI Data

Read the full article →

Liberal Tea Party? U.S. Uncut Disrupts Service At Bank Of America

February 27, 2011

Demonstrators posing as a liberal Tea Party disrupted service at banks across the country on Saturday, in an effort to spotlight the gimmicks multi-billion dollar corporations use to avoid paying their fair share in taxes. Self-organized through anti-austerity movement U.S. Uncut , regional captains helped organize demonstrators at more than 40 different branches of Bank of America. The newly-minted group was inspired by an article published recently in The Nation by Johann Hari: ” How to Build a Progressive Tea Party .” Hari writes: Imagine a parallel universe where the Great Crash of 2008 was followed by a Tea Party of a very different kind … Instead of the fake populism of the Tea Party, there is a movement based on real populism. It shows that there is an alternative to making the poor and the middle class pay for a crisis caused by the rich. It shifts the national conversation … This may sound like a fantasy–but it has all happened. The name of this parallel universe is Britain. As recently as this past fall, people here were asking the same questions liberal Americans have been glumly contemplating: Why is everyone being so passive? Why are we letting ourselves be ripped off? Why are people staying in their homes watching their flat-screens while our politicians strip away services so they can fatten the superrich even more? Hari evokes the spirit of UK Uncut — a movement made up of British citizens, who, in the face of brutal budget cuts, have sought to shame corporate tax dodgers through public demonstrations — and suggests Americans follow suit. U.S. Uncut is doing just that; Saturday marked the group’s first coordinated event. “Billionaires got bonuses, bailouts and tax cuts, too — the least they can do is pay their fair share of taxes,” said Ryan Clay, a 28-year-old media analyst who helped organize the U.S. Uncut demonstration in Washington, DC. “I got inspired, other people got inspired, we met online, and we’re working through social media to really bring these abhorrent facts to the public.” A rally in San Francisco drew scores of protesters to a branch of Bank of America at Union Square; dressed in ordinary street clothes, they filed into the bank one by one, getting in line to speak with the tellers. Each of them carried a fake check from Bank of America made out to “The United States c/o Tax Paying Citizens,” for $1.5 billion. The sum would cover all the bank’s unpaid taxes on its 2009 earned income of $4.4 billion, demonstrators said. Only a few people had presented their fake checks to the tellers before the bank temporarily closed for business; protesters were peacefully escorted out of the building by the police. Once on the street, however, they stayed put and kept handing out fake checks, which had facts about corporate tax avoidance written in fine print on the back, as fliers. “Two-thirds of all U.S. corporations do not pay federal income tax,” the fliers said. “BofA is the largest bank and the 5th largest corporation in America.” “I think our fliers did better than political fliers usually do,” said Leslie Dreyer, 32, a resident of Oakland, Calif., who came up with the idea of using checks as props. “People were like, ‘Oh, a check!’” A Bank of America spokeswoman did not immediately return a request for comment. Many of the largest corporations in the country have mastered the art of evading taxes, booking expenses in the U.S. and profits in low-tax countries. A list compiled by Forbes shows that Bank of America was far from being the only multi-billion dollar corporation to avoid paying taxes on billions of dollars in earnings in 2009; it is also not the only bank to spark angry demonstrations this week. On Wednesday morning, New York City Councilman Jumaane Williams marched into a Park Avenue Chase bank to denounce the bank’s failure to help homeowners avoid foreclosure. HuffPost’s Laura Basset reports : After denouncing the bank to a cheering crowd and calling its executives “bloodsuckers” for accepting bailout money and refusing to help the suffering homeowners they “preyed on,” Williams was stopped by security guards at the door and told the branch was closed. The mob then chanted “open the door” until Williams was let in, at which point he closed his account. Williams told HuffPost that when campaigning in New York City, he met at least two people on every block with mortgage troubles. He said he doesn’t want the bank to use his money to “further deteriorate the community” he represents, especially in light of chief executive Jamie Dimon’s recent $17 million bonus. “It’s incredible what these banks are making people go through,” he said. “It’s disgusting. They’re like bloodsuckers, just sucking the lifeblood out of communities and refusing to help out. I understand that people need to get paid to get the best and brightest and these bonuses help with that, but you can’t do that and then not assist the community and then get a taxpayer bailout to the tune of billions of dollars. That’s just greed at its worst.” To help readers navigating an underwater mortgage, HuffPost has scheduled a meetup where homeowners can get together and talk about their mortgage-related troubles. The next meetup is slated for the second Tuesday in March, and each subsequent meeting will also be held on the second Tuesday of the month; locate your local meetup chapter here . If you’re interested in organizing a meetup and need help doing it, email us at lucia@huffingtonpost.com, arthur@huffingtonpost.com or ryan@huffingtonpost.com. If you’re a real estate professional or attorney with experience in short sales and foreclosures who can help with the meetups, contact us or find your local chapter.

Read the full article →

Wells Fargo Warns It May Be Fined By Regulators

February 25, 2011

Wells Fargo & Co.’s lending and foreclosure practices probably will draw an enforcement action that may include a fine, the bank said today in a regulatory filing. “It is likely that one or more of the government agencies will initiate some type of enforcement action against Wells Fargo, which may include civil money penalties,” the San Francisco-based lender said in its annual report. “Wells Fargo continues to provide information requested by the various agencies.”

Read the full article →

Looking For A Credit Card? It Pays To Be Rich

February 21, 2011

NEW YORK — It pays to be rich if you need a credit card. A year after sweeping credit card regulations upended the industry, banks are showering perks and rewards on big spenders with sterling credit scores. And they’re socking customers with spottier histories with higher interest rates, lower credit limits and new annual fees. In some cases the riskiest customers are being dropped altogether. “When you look at the regulations, it’s a net positive for consumers,” says Peter Garuccio, a spokesman for the American Bankers Association. “But there have been some trade-offs.” The widening differences between how customers are treated is largely the result of new constraints on card issuers. The Credit Card Accountability, Responsibility and Disclosure Act, or the CARD Act, was signed into law with great fanfare at a time when borrowers across the country were struggling to make payments. It swept away several practices that for years had grated on cardholders. A key change is that issuers can no longer hike rates on existing balances or in the first year an account is open. The penalty charge for late payments is also capped at $25 per violation. And monthly statements must also clearly spell out the projected interest costs of making only minimum payments. The regulations are already transforming the cards on the market. To make up for the drop in revenue, banks are imposing new annual fees and hiking interest rates – but mostly for those with the lowest credit scores. The best customers are more prized than ever. Here’s how credit card offers are changing for consumers in three credit brackets: The A-list (excellent credit): A clean payment history and a healthy appetite for spending put these customers at the top of the credit pyramid. And the courtship of this group is intensifying. Prior to the recession, 44 percent of all credit card offers were mailed to this group. Now they receive 64 percent of all mailings, according to market researcher Synovate. The terms are getting sweeter too: _Customers can earn rewards at five times the standard rate with a premium card being tested by Bank of America. The acceleration applies to select purchases, and the $75 annual fee is waived for those who have at least $50,000 with the bank. _Generous balance transfer options abound. Think 0 percent interest for up to a year on new purchases, and as long as 18 months on transfers. _Foreign transaction fees are a source of annoyance for the well-to-do, who travel abroad more often. American Express, Chase and Citi have all announced they’re doing away with the fees on select cards marketed to their wealthiest customers. In other cases, banks are going all out with enhanced perks. With Citi’s new ThankYou Prestige card, customers who book airline tickets get one complimentary ticket for a companion each year. The card’s annual fee is $500. That underscores another attractive trait among these customers – the willingness to pay handsomely for premium services. This group’s propensity to spend is also attractive because issuers collect fees of 1 to 2 percent from merchants whenever their cardholders make purchases. The B-list (good to fair credit): The next swath of consumers have solid credit histories, but may have more modest spending habits or make an occasional late payment. Many of these customers are seeing an uptick in offers for rewards cards, but the terms aren’t dramatically different. A few rungs down the credit ladder, however, are those with spottier records. These customers make late payments often enough to raise red flags or regularly carry balances close to their credit limits. They may not be financial disasters, but they’re not entirely reliable either. Most of these B-listers still won’t have any trouble getting approved for a new credit card, but they’ll have to agree to higher interest rates and annual fees, even for plain-vanilla cards. Consider the following: _A new $59 annual fee is being imposed on select Bank of America customers. Notice of the fee was mailed out this month to cardholders who fit certain risk profiles, such as carrying a balance close to their credit limit or regularly making late payments. Customers were also targeted if they didn’t have any other relationship with the bank, such as a checking account or mortgage. _The move by Bank of America isn’t unusual. Most credit cards marketed to this group now have annual fees of about $39 to $59. A year ago, the same customers could easily find similar cards with no fees. _The average interest rate offered to those with merely fair credit scores is 22.57 percent, up from 19.07 percent about a year ago, according to CardHub.com. The higher prices make sense in light of the new limits on penalty fees and rate hikes, which make these B-list customers far less profitable. Consumer advocates say knowing the costs upfront is nevertheless an improvement to the bait-and-switch tactics employed before the regulations took effect. In the past, introductory interest rates could quickly escalate and catch cardholders off guard. The prices are simply more transparent now, says Ruth Susswein of Consumer Action. The D-List (poor credit): For the riskiest consumers with an established streak of defaults and late payments, the recession isn’t the only reason the options have dried up. The CARD Act means banks can no longer freely raise rates or impose fees to manage their default risk, says Dennis Moroney, a credit card analyst with TowerGroup. So when they issue cards, “they have to have their ducks in a row from a risk point of view.” There’s no doubt the riskiest customers have become toxic in this environment. In 2009 alone, banks wrote off a record $83.27 billion in credit card debt. It’s no wonder that card issuers have slashed available credit overall since 2007 by nearly a third, or $1.5 trillion, according to TowerGroup. With bigger issuers such as Capital One the choices for customers with tarnished credit are pretty much limited to secured credit cards. These cards are intended to help borrowers rebuild credit, but require deposits and offer small credit limits. There are often activation fees as well. Another telltale sign of the industry’s growing reluctance to wade into this market? First Premier, a long-time player in the subprime credit arena, is no longer offering new unsecured lines of credit. After the CARD Act took effect, the bank tested a card that charged $75 in first-year fees for a $300 credit line. It had a 79.9 percent interest rate. Those terms apparently haven’t been a success. It’s unclear whether First Premier will resume offering unsecured credit cards. If not, consumer advocates say the disappearance of such easy-to-get, high-cost cards wouldn’t be such a terrible development for those struggling to dig out of debt.

Read the full article →

FOREX CENTRAL BANK WATCH: Interest Rate Expectations Hold Ahead of Euro-Zone PMI Data

February 21, 2011

FOREX CENTRAL BANK WATCH: Interest Rate Expectations Hold Ahead of Euro-Zone PMI Data

Read the full article →

Irene Aldridge: Who Benefits From Rising Inflation?

February 18, 2011

On Thursday, February 17, 2011, the U.S. Bureau of Labor released the latest inflation figures. Inflation, measured as a change in the Consumer Price Index (CPI), registered a slight decline at 0.4% this past month (as compared to 0.5% realized in the previous month), and just 0.2% when food and energy are excluded from the calculation. However small these numbers may seem, the figures sounded plenty of alarms in the last couple of weeks. Some commentators declared this inflation to be unhedgeable (due to traditional inflation hedges such as gold being overpriced), and, therefore, unmanageable. Numbers, however, tell a different story, and as this article shows, inflation has some lucrative and natural hedges in today’s markets. Results of a basic event study on the impact of CPI changes on equities produce clear and stunning evidence that inflation is indeed healthy for many stocks and their investors. Among all equities susceptible to rising CPI, those most affected are shown in Table 1 along with their quantitative price responses to every 1% in monthly inflation figures. With probabilities of the response hitting 99.9%, the numbers speak loud and clear that inflation is great for at least two large sectors of the U.S. economy: financial services companies and commodity companies. Table 1. Quant response of prices of selected firms to a +1 change in CPI. (Probabilities of the response are reported in parentheses). Symbol Expected Response on Day 0: the day of the CPI announcement Expected Response on Day 1: the day after the CPI announcement Expected Response on Day 5: one week after the CPI announcement Expected Response on Day 10: two weeks after the CPI announcement Expected Response on Day 21: one month after the CPI announcement APC +4.7% (99.9%) +7.5% (100.0%) +6.1% (99.6%) +6.1% (92.0%) +17.1% (95.6%) ANR +1.2% (87.8%) +10.5% (99.9%) +10.6% (96.9%) +4.1% (74.1%) +18.2% (82.8%) ACI +2.2% (98.1%) +7.9% (99.8%) +5.4% (95.4%) +6.8% (90.6%) +22.2% (99.3%) CCJ +1.7% (99.6%) +3.9% (99.4%) +7.1% (99.7%) +7.0% (88.4%) +13.9% (87.6%) BK +4.8% (99.3%) +8.3% (100.0%) +1.9% (84.3%) -5.1% (71.1%) +10.6% (95.8%) AXP +5.2% (99.6%) +6.5% (99.6%) +8.7% (99.9%) -0.8% (50.6%) +33.5% (99.5%) First, about commodity companies. True, prices of many commodities like gold and cotton are at their near-record levels and can be hardly helpful for inflation hedging. Other commodities, however, are still fair game, as the numbers show. In particular, petroleum companies (i.e. Anadarko Petroleum: APC), coal producers (i.e. Alpha Natural Resources: ANR, Arch Coal: ACI), aluminum handlers (i.e. Alcoa: AA), and even uranium suppliers (i.e. Cameco: CCJ) persistently rise following increases in inflation. Increasing the concentration of these and similar stocks in one’s portfolio is likely to provide a hedge against inflation. Then, there are the financial services companies like the Bank of New York Mellon Corp. (BK) and American Express (AXP) that statistically benefit from rising inflation. How so? The simplest explanation can be found in the lending rates of these firms: with higher inflation, the banks tend to charge higher nominal rates from their customers, capturing a larger spread between the rates at which they lend and the rates at which they borrow. Popular banking products with variable interest rates such as credit cards, are subject to a rate hike, generating a fair premium for banks. Whether one likes it or not, banks are in a lucrative position as far as inflation is concerned. How good of a hedge can financial services or commodity companies provide? As Table 1 shows, both sets of firms take well to inflation. For example, in response to a 1% monthly increase in the CPI, the price of the Bank of New York Mellon (BK) on average rises by nearly 5% on the day of the CPI announcement and by over 10% in one month following the announcement, with over 95% statistical confidence. Allocating just a fraction of your portfolio to the inflation-driven stocks may be sufficient to immunize your entire portfolio. While fretting about the onset of inflation and speculating about its ramifications in the fundamental space, why not hedge it based on quant analysis?

Read the full article →