british

Former World Bank Chief: Gordon Brown Should Be Next Head Of IMF

April 20, 2011

WASHINGTON — A former head of the World Bank waded into a public row between Britain’s last and current prime ministers over who should be the next managing director of the International Monetary Fund. One day after British Prime Minister David Cameron offered a scathing denunciation of Gordon Brown’s qualifications to oversee the world’s economic and financial affairs as head of the IMF, James Wolfensohn told The Huffington Post that the conservative leader was still “a little bitter” over the nasty campaign his Tory Party narrowly won last election. If “internal politics” are extracted from the debate, he said, “there is no one better than Gordon Brown” to head the global fund. Brown spent a decade working as former Labor leader Tony Blair’s chancellor of the exchequer — the British equivalent of the U.S. Treasury Secretary — before becoming PM himself in June 2007. Brown was evicted from 10 Downing Street by Cameron after a hard-fought, three-way race that included Liberal Democrat Nick Clegg. The 2010 election came on the heels of the global financial crisis, which left the British — much like their American cousins — mired in a deep national debt. Cameron strongly hinted that he would block any attempt to nominate Brown to the IMF post in a BBC interview on Tuesday. “It does seem to me that, if you have someone who didn’t think we had a debt problem in the UK when we self-evidently do have a debt problem, then they might not be the most appropriate person to work out whether other countries around the world have debt and deficit problems,” Cameron said in the radio discussion. “Above all what matters is: is the person running the IMF someone who understands the dangers of excessive debt, excessive deficit?” he went on. “And it really must be someone who gets that rather than someone who says that they don’t see a problem.” Wolfensohn worked closely and often collaborated with Brown, then Britain’s chancellor, during most of his two terms as head of the World Bank, which spanned from 1995 to 2005. As head of the institution charged with promoting economic growth in less-developed countries, Wolfensohn said his personal dealings with Brown revealed he was “extraordinarily professional and very capable and knows the business extremely well.” “I don’t know why he said it,” Wolfensohn said of Cameron’s remarks. “[Brown] is extremely well-informed, always well-prepared and has vast experience.” The IMF is responsible for ensuring the stability of the international monetary system — a network of exchange rates and international payments that makes it possible for countries to transact business with one other. Brown chaired its key International Monetary and Financial Committee until 2007, and he has made no secret that he would like return as the IMF director. At the moment, though, there is no vacancy to be filled. The current head of the IMF, Dominique Strauss-Kahn, has more than a year left to his five-year term. But the speculation , which is as high as his place in French opinion polls, is that he may step down in the next few months to challenge President Nicholas Sarkozy in France’s election next year. Whether the current IMF chief serves out his time in office or resigns in the near future, the horse race to replace him is well underway. But Brown has more than digs from Cameron to contend with if he hopes to be nominated by the British government and voted in by a majority of the IMF’s board of directors . Voicing the concerns of many, financial blogger Felix Salmon said Brown “comes with way too much baggage: he’ll never be able to admit that enormous chunks of what he did as Chancellor turned out, in hindsight, to be disastrous.” The head of the IMF “has to deliver tough news about debt and deficits to heads of state around the world — and Brown simply has no credibility on that front,” Salmon wrote. “His diplomatic skills leave something to be desired as well.” Salmon endorsed Cameron’s suggestion that the IMF consider a candidate from outside Europe, where the recent economic meltdown hasn’t exactly been a ringing endorsement for fiscal know-how. The PM said prospects from rising economic powerhouses India, China or South Asia ought to be in the mix. ”It may well be the time for the IMF to start thinking about that shift in focus,” Cameron told the BBC. A European has served as managing director of the IMF since it was founded at the end of World War II, just as an American has headed up the World Bank since that time. But that arrangement is, as Wolfensohn noted, “not a rule, it’s been tradition.” It dates back to a time when most of the world’s economic output came from Western nations. The idea of expanding the pool of potential IMF directors beyond the countries in power in 1944, when the concept for the two Bretton Woods institutions was developed in the woods of New Hampshire, has been discussed before . Still, Wolfensohn said he is certain Brown is the man to carry out needed reforms. “If it were on the basis of competence, it would surprise me if others come out against him,” he said of a Brown candidacy. “If it’s on the basis of politics, then I couldn’t tell you” how it will come out.

Read the full article →

Euro Tops Out in April, British Pound To Hold Range Ahead Of BoE Minutes

April 14, 2011

Euro Tops Out in April, British Pound To Hold Range Ahead Of BoE Minutes

Read the full article →

U.S. Dollar Continues To Sell Off Ahead Of Fed’s Beige Book, British Pound Searches For Support

April 13, 2011

U.S. Dollar Continues To Sell Off Ahead Of Fed’s Beige Book, British Pound Searches For Support

Read the full article →

FOREX: British Pound to Find Little Support From Modest Jobless Claims Drop

April 13, 2011

FOREX: British Pound to Find Little Support From Modest Jobless Claims Drop

Read the full article →

Video: Branson Expects Virgin Atlantic to Find Alliance Partner

April 7, 2011

April 6 (Bloomberg) — Richard Branson, founder of Virgin Group Ltd., talks about the possibility of finding a partner for Virgin Atlantic Airways Ltd. to compete with British Airways. Branson also discusses the Virgin Galactic commercial space-travel venture. He speaks with Cory Johnson on Bloomberg Television’s “Bloomberg West.” (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Euro Threatens Upward Trend, British Pound Outlook Remains Flat

April 5, 2011

Euro Threatens Upward Trend, British Pound Outlook Remains Flat

Read the full article →

Australian Dollar Battered Ahead Of RBA Rate Decision, British Pound To Hold Broad Range

April 4, 2011

Australian Dollar Battered Ahead Of RBA Rate Decision, British Pound To Hold Broad Range

Read the full article →

Eric J. Weiner: Gaddafi’s Long Reach

March 25, 2011

Regardless of how the Libyan revolt plays out, in the global economy the humanitarian crisis is just one deadly aspect of the fighting. Thousands have been killed and the fabric of society has been shredded in what has become a civil war. But to the nations of Europe that have come to rely on a steady flow of oil and petrodollars from Moammar Gaddafi’s nation, the destruction of what could be called Libya Inc. is likely to be the most painful blow. When the United Nations lifted sanctions on Libya in 2003, after Gaddafi’s regime accepted responsibility for the bombing of a Pan Am jet over Lockerbie, Scotland, many European countries rushed to do business with Gaddafi, despite his erratic history. Why? Because Libya was sitting on a deep, largely untapped reservoir of oil and a mountain of cash. It has more than 40 billion barrels of proven petroleum reserves , ninth most in the world, and its central bank holds $110 billion in foreign exchange reserves while its sovereign wealth fund, the Libyan Investment Authority, has $70 billion more to invest. Seeing the opportunity, Europe pounced. As a result, today just about all of Libya’s major trading partners are European. Take Italy, for example. Italy is by far Libya’s most active business partner, with more than $12 billion in two-way trade annually . Libya supplies almost a quarter of Italy’s oil, and Italy is the world’s largest importer of Libyan crude. Libya also owns 7.5% of the Italian bank UniCredit and has investments in Fiat, the defense conglomerate Finmeccanica, the energy company ENI, the soccer team Juventus and a variety of other Italian businesses. This financial backing helped Italy stave off the most damaging effects of the global recession that started in 2008. In response to international pressure, Italy has frozen some Libyan assets, but none belonging to the country’s central bank or the Libyan Investment Authority. However, Italy’s hardly the only cash-strapped European nation to forge significant economic ties with the Gaddafi regime. In 2009, the European Union’s two-way trading with Libya amounted to more than $37 billion , with Germany, France and Spain among its leading partners. Naturally, the bulk of this was petroleum because Libya supplies more than 10% of Europe’s oil. For a sense of just how much that is, consider that the United States, which had just $2.6 billion in two-way trade with Libya in 2009 and imports virtually no petroleum from the country, gets roughly 10% of its oil from Saudi Arabia. That’s what Europe is losing as Libya burns. In many ways, the nation with the most at stake economically is Britain. Although its annual trade with Libya amounts to less than $2.5 billion , Britain has recently emerged as a major target for Libyan investments. Libya has spent hundreds of millions of dollars on prime London commercial real estate. And last year, a senior executive with the Libyan Investment Authority announced that the fund had earmarked $8 billion exclusively for Britain . This pledge was welcome news for the British government, which has been trying to sell more than $40 billion in state-owned property to help address its yawning budget deficit. In short, it needs the money. Libya’s fascination with Britain stems from Gaddafi’s second-oldest son and presumed political heir, 38-year-old Saif al-Islam, who earned a doctorate from the London School of Economics, owns a $16-million mansion in London’s fashionable Hampstead Garden neighborhood and even opened the Libyan Investment Authority’s first foreign office in London. Over the years, the erudite younger Gaddafi charmed his way into British society, befriending Prince Andrew and visiting Buckingham Palace and Windsor Castle. Of course, now that he’s become a full-throated defender of his father’s savagery, Saif’s erstwhile friends are rushing to distance themselves. The London School of Economics, which has come under heavy criticism for accepting a $2.4-million donation from a Gaddafi charity, is looking into accusations that he plagiarized parts of his doctoral thesis. And his abandoned London home has been occupied by anti-Gaddafi protesters from throughout Britain. But none of these reprisals changes the cold reality that with Libya descending into chaos, Europe is losing a major partner just when its key economies are struggling to regain their footing. Though the timing may be terrible, the outcome shouldn’t be surprising. Europe’s leaders chose to look past the mercurial Gaddafi’s violent past, seeing only Libya’s fortune. And in a matter of weeks, Gaddafi has destroyed everything. As populist movements spread from North Africa to the Arabian Peninsula, where protests have erupted in Bahrain and Yemen, the U.S. will probably face similar issues over its troubling economic alliances, particularly with Saudi Arabia. So U.S. leaders would be wise to pay close attention to what happens with Libya and Europe. An entire continent is wondering: If not the Gaddafis, then who? And it probably won’t be long before America is asking the same questions about its friends as well. Originally published in the Los Angeles Times .

Read the full article →

Diane Francis: Japan and Libya Mark Canada’s Energy Victory

March 21, 2011

Japan’s nuclear catastrophe, and the UN Security Council’s support for Libyan people against Muammar Gaddafi, have financial implications well beyond market volatility. The Japanese “brand”, based on brilliant planning and execution, has been permanently tarnished. First it was Toyota’s colossal recalls and now the world discovers that six reactors were built in an earthquake zone, subject to tsunamis, without sufficient fortifications or back-ups to back-ups. Instead, the repair job has become a Kamikaze-like effort by several dozen middle-aged volunteers whose failure will take the world into uncharted territory. This fiasco guarantees that the nuclear option, to replace fossil fuels and save the world from the effects of over-population, is about as attractive as having Colonel Gaddafi drop by for dinner. This increases dramatically the probability that two Canadian pipeline projects, and others, will be invited to dinner: The Keystone Pipeline expansion bringing oil sands output to US refineries and the Mackenzie Valley Gas Pipeline will proceed. The US government has been dithering about Keystone’s environmental impact (they already have 50,000 miles of pipelines there) and the Canadian government has dithered for decades about Mackenzie, mostly recently over a request to back a small portion of the line so aboriginals can own a piece of the action. Both governments must approve these lines. In the US, this is because, without construction of new nuclear facilities, the country will need more oil and Middle East volatility means that region is undesirable as a supplier. So Canada’s oil sands are essential. Tellingly, USA Today editorialized in favor of Canada’s “dirty” oil. “The Keystone expansion would provide an extra 500,000 barrels of oil a day from a secure ally and neighbor, enabling the US to offset declining supplies from Mexico and Venezuela and avoid having to reach out to less-stable oil exporters. At a time of rising gasoline prices and turmoil in the Middle East, the US is in no position to be finicky about its oil imports,” said the newspaper. “And here’s something else to consider: If the US blocks the pipeline, Canadian developers have made it clear they’ll be glad to build west instead of south — and sell oil from the West Coast to China.” The Mackenzie Pipeline will, and should, proceed because increasing oil sands production (which needs natural gas), removal of the nuclear option in Canada and commitments to take coal plants out of service by 2025 will require four times more natural gas than it can bring to markets. According to Ziff Energy, a leading energy consultancy, the Mackenzie, Alaska gas pipeline, producible shale gas and conventional gas deposits would all be needed and viable in future. For instance, Ziff said that Canadian conventional gas reserves are declining by up to 20% per year, which requires the replacement of up to 4 billion cubic feet per day of new supplies. That’s equivalent to the total production from three Mackenzie Valley Pipelines. Decline rates are similar south of the border and will require at least ten times’ more gas. Power generation is also starting to switch from coal or oil to natural gas for environmental reasons. In June 2010, this was mandated in a Canadian Federal Government policy which will phase out 33 inefficient coal-fired plants in Canada whose economic life will end by 2025. Their licenses will not be renewed unless their emissions are reduced dramatically to the same level as gas-fired plants. The amount of gas needed to replace these 33 dirty coal plants totals 1.2 billion cubic feet per day, or the entire annual output of the Mackenzie Valley Pipeline. Fossil fuels brings me to the democratization of the Arab world and this week’s Libya support in the United Nations. Ten countries voted in favor of a resolution to crush him some time soon by any method necessary, while the other five — China, India, Russia, Brazil and Germany — were smart enough to simply abstain and get out of the way. This vote was historically significant for two reasons: It was backed by broad-based support for democracy and against tyrants and, secondly, it marked a stepping down by the United States from the role of superpower which, frankly, it cannot any longer afford financially or reputationally. The fact is that President Obama is delivering on his promises to take the training wheels off Iraq’s fragile democracy and to be multilateral and let others do the heavy lifting. As an American taxpayer, and a Canadian one, I applaud his behind-the-scenes community activist role in letting if not encouraging the French, of all nations, to take the lead in the Libya initiative, followed by the British, Arab League and African Union. It’s also a sign of fiscal prudence on the part of Washington which is good news for Americans and Canadians alike. Cross-posted in the Financial Post .

Read the full article →

Otaviano Canuto: Whither the U.S. Dollar

March 16, 2011

Is the U.S. dollar really doomed? If it were for some headlines, you would certainly think so. Because of the “Made in the U.S.A” financial crisis, growing budget deficits and debt, increasing dissatisfaction with the international monetary system, and the emerging power of countries such as China, many voices are now proclaiming the eventual demise of the dollar. Not so fast, some discerning minds warn. One of them is Barry Eichengreen, Professor of Economics and Political Science at the University of California, Berkeley, and author of the recently released book, Exorbitant Privilege: The Rise and Fall of the Dollar and the Future of the International Monetary System . He came to present his new book to the World Bank this week, sparking a fascinating debate not only about the future of the dollar, but about global politics. “I’m not predicting its demise, but that it [the dollar] will share the stage,” Eichengreen concluded. But to get here, the professor first debunked four prevailing myths: Widespread international use of a currency confers on its issuer geopolitical and strategic leverage. Incumbency is an overwhelming advantage in the competition for reserve currency status. The dollar is now doomed to lose its international currency status. There is room for only one international currency. As Exorbitant Privilege makes clear, it’s a country’s position as a great power that results in the international status of its currency, not the other way around. Regarding the incumbency “myth,” the British pound, for instance, remained the dominant international currency until after World War II, even after the U.S. had overtaken Britain as the leading economy. And what about the “menacing” euro, the emerging Chinese reminbi, and the Special Drawing Rights (SDRs) from the International Monetary Fund? Professor Eichengreen makes clear that despite their growing importance, they cannot yet compete with the currency of the U.S., still the largest economy in the world with the largest and deepest financial markets of any country. But all of the above doesn’t mean that the dollar will remain untouched. In fact, there is room for more than one international currency. “There is no reason that only one country can have financial markets deep and broad enough to make international use of its currency attractive,” writes Eichengreen. For him, the emerging world is one in which several international currencies coexist: dollar, euro, and reminbi. “We are definitely moving into a world with emerging currencies, and multipolar monetary and financial systems,” he explained at the World Bank. Will this be a better international system than what we have now? Only time will tell, but for now many like Professor Eichengreen and I believe such a system will better reflect the reality of our multipolar world, and therefore, make it more stable. This blog was originally posted on the World Bank Institute Growth and Crisis website.

Read the full article →

New Zealand Dollar To Maintain Downward Trend, British Pound To Hold February Range

March 14, 2011

New Zealand Dollar To Maintain Downward Trend, British Pound To Hold February Range

Read the full article →

Investors Put Murdoch In A Bind, Push BSkyB Value Skyward

March 10, 2011

News Corp mogul Rupert Murdoch turns 80 today , and he finds himself tantalizingly close to closing a deal that would take his media empire to new heights: the “complete takeover of UK satellite television operator British Sky Broadcasting (BSkyB), which would cement News Corporation’s move away from relying on the cyclical advertising market to drive earnings.” Murdoch sees the move to a subscriber model of content as critical to his empire’s bottom line. That plan, however, is hitting a snag. A year ago, Murdoch offered a competitive bid at 700p per share for BSkyB, which at the time was trading at 555p per share. The move was reminiscent of the way Murdoch drew down on Dow Jones. There, he offered $60 per share on a property that was trading at $36. A lot of intense wrangling ensued, during which time Dow’s value rose right up against Murdoch’s offer. The same thing is happening with BSkyB, only in this case, activist investors have caused BSkyB’s value to skyrocket. Yesterday, it closed at 828.05. Leading the charge to push up BSkyB’s value are two hedge fund managers. The first is financier Frank Brosens , who runs Taconic Capital Advisors and who has “in recent weeks bought more than 20.7m shares in BSkyB, amounting to a 1.18pc stake in the company.” The other is Crispin Odey of Odey Capital Management . In a fun twist, Odey is Murdoch’s former son-in-law. Hedge funds now control 12 percent of BskyB. They seem, at the very least, determined to force Rupert to take a haircut on the deal. They’re actually just 3 percent short of being in position to block the deal entirely. As you might imagine, there’s enormous resistance in Europe to Murdoch expanding his empire. Consumers aren’t fond of the idea of massive media consolidation coming to the United Kingdom. Murdoch’s decision to install his son James as the chief executive has been greeted by investors with charges of nepotism . The U.K. is also still roiling over the phone hacking scandal that News Corp property News Of The World engaged in, and which cost former NOTW editor Andy Coulsen his position at 10 Downing Street as PM David Cameron’s communications director. Beyond that, investors eye the coming rollout of a new BSkyB box as a reason to believe that BSkyB’s share price is currently undervalued. The dramatic rise in share price puts Murdoch, who had hoped to make the acquisition for £7.8 billion, in a bind. Per Andrew Clark at the Guardian : “One leading institutional investor told the Observer that a fair valuation for BSkyB was 950p per share – which would cost News Corp £10.5bn – and that the inclusion of a bid premium would push the true asking price up to as much as £11 per share, or more than £12bn.” Ultimately, I’ve learned to not bet against Rupert when he sets his sights on an acquisition, especially one that he desires so desperately in order to immunize his media holdings from the vagaries of the advertising market. It seems pretty clear, however, that this time around, Murdoch will have to pay dearly to get what he wants. [Would you like to follow me on Twitter ? Because why not? Also, please send tips to tv@huffingtonpost.com -- learn more about our media monitoring project here .]

Read the full article →

GBPUSD: British Pound US Dollar Exchange Rate Forecast

March 9, 2011

GBPUSD: British Pound US Dollar Exchange Rate Forecast

Read the full article →

Japanese Yen Reversal To Gather Pace, British Pound Searches For Support

March 7, 2011

Japanese Yen Reversal To Gather Pace, British Pound Searches For Support

Read the full article →

Japanese Yen Reversal To Gather Pace, British Pound Searches For Support

March 7, 2011

Japanese Yen Reversal To Gather Pace, British Pound Searches For Support

Read the full article →

Lehman Brothers Battles With Investors

March 4, 2011

LONDON (By Sarah White) – A legal tussle between defunct Lehman Brothers (LEHMQ.PK) and investors in highly complex debt vehicles has drawn attention from financial professionals and British football clubs alike. The dispute reaches beyond the obscure clauses in the instruments caught up in the row, with consequences for the order in which creditors get paid out in a bankruptcy — a source of contention in football insolvencies too. Billions of dollars of derivatives are at stake, and risk losing their worth if the case goes against investors. A similar, widely-trailed case settled in the United States last year had already sparked alarm among lawyers, noteholders, and academics watching the securitization industry. One Manhattan federal court judge, calling for a review of a decision on the case last September before a settlement with Lehman was reached, cited its “potentially game-changing effect on the structured finance business.” She added that it had “potentially far-reaching ramifications for the international securities markets and has triggered significant uncertainty in the financial community.” The dispute centers on a series of credit-linked notes, part of only one of Lehman’s synthetic collateralized debt obligation (CDO) programs — known as Dante — valued at $12.5 billion at the time of the firm’s collapse in September 2008. The stakes are high for those owed money by Lehman, for whom derivative deals are a big chunk of what they are hoping to claw back. The creditors are pitted against a group of Australian investors known as Belmont in a UK appeal to the Supreme Court, where three days of hearings ended this week. A verdict is expected to emerge after several weeks, lawyers close to the case said. Both Lehman and the investors are hoping to seize the assets backing the deals, and any final ruling would set a precedent for how the priority of payments in billions of dollars worth of similar deals are worked out. LOOMING DOWNGRADES Investors need a validation of so-called flip clauses in the notes they hold, designed to reorder payment priorities in bankruptcies and allowing them to jump in ahead of Lehman. Trouble looms if they lose, as noteholders in deals with similar structures would find they had no guarantee of being paid out when other parties default. “Certainly for anything that is rated, the rating agencies may seek to downgrade in some cases. They are watching very carefully what happens with the litigation,” said Jennifer Marshall, a partner at Allen & Overy specializing in insolvency, whose clients have followed the case. “For non-rated transactions, I’m sure you’d find parties coming back to the table wanting to renegotiate.” The synthetic CDOs, which expose investors to a pool of insurance contracts on debt known as credit-default swaps, were in the main rated triple-A. Some of the legal arguments at stake in the exotic-sounding financial deals could also have a bearing for football clubs. The British taxman and the Premier League, the top league in the country, are intervening in proceedings, hoping for clarity on the priority of payments when clubs go bust. Footballers are usually paid out first, to the detriment of the taxman — a situation the UK Revenues and Customs department may be able to reverse if it can cite legal precedents. But a conclusion may yet take time to emerge. Lehman managed to settle with another group of Australian investors caught up in the Dante CDO row last November, after U.S. bankruptcy judge James Peck ruled in Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.’s favor, but UK courts found against it. Should Lehman lose its appeal at the Supreme Court, a transatlantic battle between the U.S. and British courts could be revived, if litigation heads back to the United States. Lawyers would have to work out which rulings to abide by, adding an extra lawyer of complexity to Lehman’s sprawling bankruptcy workout, the biggest and costliest in U.S. history. (Editing by David Cowell) Copyright 2011 Thomson Reuters. Click for Restrictions .

Read the full article →

Jeffrey Rubin: Only a Recession Stands in the Way of $200 Oil

March 3, 2011

With very limited excess capacity in Saudi Arabia and the rest of OPEC, further production shutdowns in the convulsing Middle East will soon push oil prices to new record highs. The Brent futures contract, the world’s benchmark price, almost reached $120 per barrel in London last week. With gasoline soon to cost six pounds a gallon (£1.32 pounds/liter), the British government is already considering alternative rationing systems to the brute price mechanism at the pumps. Amid the chaos sweeping through the Middle East, it is easy to lose sight of where oil prices were trading before the political protests began. Brent was north of $100 per barrel before protestors started sweeping into Cairo’s Tahrir Square. The triple digit price for oil was due to runaway global demand, which by the end of last year had soared to more than a record 87 million barrels per day. It was yet not about potential supply shocks from Libya or anywhere else in the Middle East. Now throw in supply disruptions from the world’s largest oil producing region, and it isn’t hard to find a path to $200 per barrel oil. When I first predicted $200 per barrel oil prices in 2008 as the chief economist of CIBC World Markets, it was in the context of expecting another four years of global economic growth. Of course, that didn’t take into account the impact of triple digit prices on fuel-dependent GDP growth. Even $147 per barrel prices brought global economic growth to a screeching halt. It is all the more remarkable that despite triggering the world’s deepest post-war recession and a rare, albeit temporary decline in global oil consumption, oil prices had already soared back to triple digit levels even before the Arab revolt. And it will be difficult to keep prices from moving even higher as investors start piling on the oil bandwagon, particularly when they see most of Saudi Arabia’s much touted four million a barrel a day excess capacity is largely of the fictional variety while, at the same time, noticing how little effect monetary tightening is having on restraining China’s exploding fuel demand. What speculators will have to worry about is where things are going. If we learned anything from the last recession, it was our oil dependent, transport heavy, global economy doesn’t run very well on $147 per barrel crude. And other than bailing out bankrupt investment banks and automobile companies at the cost of record public-sector deficits, not much has changed in our economies over the past three years to suggest our next encounter with that these kinds of prices will lead to a different result. We are moving inexorably closer to another oil price induced recession. And when we get there, oil demand and oil prices will once again collapse. The only question is will we see $200 per barrel oil first?

Read the full article →

FX Headlines: British Pound Under Pressure Amid Decline in U.K. PMI Services

March 3, 2011

FX Headlines: British Pound Under Pressure Amid Decline in U.K. PMI Services

Read the full article →

Australian Dollar Continues To Test For Resistance, British Pound To Maintain Trend Ahead Of BoE

March 3, 2011

Australian Dollar Continues To Test For Resistance, British Pound To Maintain Trend Ahead Of BoE

Read the full article →

No End In Sight For Libyan Oil Supply Fears

February 27, 2011

MADRID — Libya’s oil industry is in chaos – and there’s no telling when that will end. Armed men loot equipment from oil field installations. British commandos execute secret raids in the Libyan desert to rescue stranded oil workers as security disintegrates rapidly in remote camps. Libyan port workers, frightened of being caught up in Moammar Gadhafi’s violent crackdown on protesters, fail to show up for work, leaving empty tankers floating around the Mediterranean Sea waiting to load crude. And the European oil companies extracting Libya’s black gold are operating in crisis mode, trying to get stranded expatriate workers out and safe amid conflicting information on how much oil is still being pumped and just where it all is. That was just this week. The situation is not expected to get better in the near future. No one knows whether Gadhafi or the rebels trying to oust him will end up controlling Africa’s biggest oil reserves. Fears abound that Libya could turn into a fractured nation with competing armed groups ruling over rich and remote desert fields lying hundreds of miles (kilometers) apart from each other. The chaos in Libya as it descends into virtual civil war has sent international oil prices skyrocketing despite a pledge from Saudi Arabia, the world’s largest oil exporter, to ramp up exports. And that volatility is likely to continue, because it could take weeks or even months for Libyan production and exports to return to normal levels, experts said. That has sent already over-caffinated oil traders into a frenzy that won’t calm down until there’s more clarity about what is happening on the ground in Libya. The International Energy Agency reported late Friday that Libya is probably still producing about 850,000 barrels of oil daily, down from its normal capacity of 1.6 million barrels – but acknowledged the estimate is based on “incomplete, conflicting information.” Libya produces just under 2 percent of the world’s oil, but its customers are overwhelmingly European. Hardest hit by the sudden oil shortage are European refiners that receive 85 percent of Libya’s exports, turning the country’s highly valued crude into diesel and jet fuel. The biggest buyers are Italy, France, Germany and Spain – and Spain is so concerned it announced Friday that highway speed limits will be reduced in March in a desperate bid to cut fuel consumption. The biggest problem facing oil companies and European consumers who depend on Libyan oil is a near-complete breakdown in solid information. Phones in Libya rarely work, Internet is intermittent, workers are fleeing and looters are grabbing what they can or pose a threat until order is restored. While British military planes staged a daring desert rescue Saturday of 150 oil workers, hundreds of other workers were heading across the Sahara Desert in bus convoys toward the Egyptian border – a grueling trip. One evacuee said the military plane he boarded in Libya was supposed to carry around 65 people, but quickly grew to double that. “It was very cramped but we were just glad to be out of there,” Patrick Eyles, a 43-year-old Briton, said at Malta International Airport. Spain’s Repsol-YPF oil company announced Tuesday it had suspended operations in Libya, only to find out a day later that the oil fields it operates with other firms were still producing 160,000 barrels of crude daily. Still, that was less than half of the 360,000 barrels produced before the crisis began. Despite reports that production was still under way in the vast Saharan desert Amal fields, Libyans never before permitted to approach the oil fields under Gadhafi’s reign showed up armed and took anything they could – four-wheel drive vehicles, pumps, generators. One group came with a trailer and tried to remove a huge crane, said Gavin de Salis, chairman of Britain’s OPS international oil field services company. “Nobody shot anyone,” De Salis. “But people were wandering around with guns saying ‘Thanks, we’ll take your vehicle since you’re leaving anyway.’” Two buses arranged by De Salis’ company were ferrying 117 expatriate workers toward Egypt on Sunday, a trip expected to last 24 hours or more, and he said another bus was expected to take 25 expatriates out. Even though production appears to be limping along – with Repsol reporting that Libyan oil workers are increasingly running operations as expatriates leave – the oil isn’t getting out. The 320-mile (520-kilometer) natural gas pipeline under the Mediterranean from Libya to the Italian island of Sicily has been shut down for a week, with no guidance from its owner, the Italian energy firm Eni SpA, on when it might start pumping again. “Most Libyan ports are closed due to bad weather, staff shortages, or production outages,” the IEA reported. Ports are key because Libya’s crude heads abroad on tankers. Major container ship companies have suspended deliveries or pickups from Libyan ports with no word on when shipments might resume. Tanker ships that deliver to Europe have been told to stay more than 100 miles (160 kilometers) offshore from some Libyan ports and await information on whether they can safely dock and take on oil. The massive oil terminal at Brega, Libya’s second-largest hydrocarbon complex, was nearly deserted over the weekend, with operations scaled back almost 90 percent because employees had fled and ships were not showing up. The Brega complex, about 125 miles (200 kilometers) west of the rebel stronghold of Benghazi, collects crude oil and gas from Libya’s fields in the southeast and prepares it for export. Since the crisis began Feb. 15, however, General Manager Fathi Eissa said production had dropped from 90,000 barrels of crude a day to 11,000. With huge spherical storage containers and reservoirs rapidly filling up with oil and natural gas and no ships to take it away, production in the southern fields has been throttled back until Brega can clear some of its capacity. The big oil companies have been mum on how the political situation may pan out, because they want to produce oil whether Gadhafi or someone else ends up in charge, and it’s not worth it for them to risk alienating any of the groups vying for power, said Mohammed El-Katiri, a Middle East analyst at the Eurasia Group risk consulting group. In a worst-case scenario, El-Katiri predicted it could take between four to six months to for Libya’s domestic unrest to ease. “Such a scenario bodes poorly from an oil production point of view on two counts: Not only will it compromise production with Gadhafi still in power, but ongoing violence could further complicate the ability of a post-Gadhafi political order to emerge in a manner that creates a stable domestic security environment,” El-Katiri said. Repsol’s chairman, Antonio Brufau, told reporters he would get his last expatriate workers out using bicycles if necessary – and El-Katiri said oil companies won’t send them back in until they know it’s safe. De Salis said some expatriates could return without a functioning central government but only if local security situations improve. Leaving oil fields deserted in Libya creates even more security problems. In Nigeria, opportunistic villagers, rebels or pirates often tap pipelines in a dangerous bid to steal fuel, leaving many killed or maimed in accidents and pipelines compromised by sabotage. About the only positive sign for Libya’s oil future is that experts believe both Gadhafi and the rebels want to restart suspended oil operations as quickly as possible because they covet Libya’s oil wealth. “For Gadhafi, the money helps because he can keep on paying his militias and mercenaries to keep them fighting and loyal,” El-Katiri said. The rebels, meanwhile, don’t want to alienate Western governments that depend on Libyan oil, he said, and also need money to be strong enough “to resist attacks by Gadhafi.” ___ Paul Schemm in Brega, Libya; Chris Kahn and Jon Fahey in New York and Cassandra Vinograd in London contributed to this report.

Read the full article →

Video: Bernstein Seeks Human Rights `Basics’ for Middle East

February 26, 2011

Feb. 25 (Bloomberg) — Robert Bernstein, founder of Human Rights Watch and former chief executive officer of Random House Inc., and Richard Kemp, the former commander of British troops in Afghanistan, talk about their newly formed watchdog group Advancing Human Rights. They speak with Pimm Fox on Bloomberg Television’s “Taking Stock.” (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Asia’s Richest Man Ink’s Huge Deal With BP

February 21, 2011

MUMBAI (By Jui Chakravorty and Sumeet Chatterjee) – Mukesh Ambani does not do small. He is the richest man in Asia, chairman of India’s biggest listed company, and lives in one of the largest and most expensive homes in the world. On Monday, he struck a deal with BP that will see the British energy giant pump at least $7.2 billion into gas projects developed by his Reliance Industries in one of the country’s largest foreign investments. The blockbuster deal comes less than a year after Ambani won a gas pricing dispute with his younger brother Anil that went all the way to the Supreme Court, leading to the end of a long-running family feud that had captivated India. At 53, Mukesh Ambani is the world’s fourth richest man with a net worth estimated at $29 billion, according to Forbes. The older son of Reliance Industries founder Dhirubhai Ambani, a schoolteacher’s son whose rise inspired a Bollywood film, Mukesh is known to be soft-spoken, a vegetarian and a teetotaller, and keeps a lower public profile than his brother. A chemical engineer by training, Mukesh Ambani dropped out of an MBA program at Stanford University, where he was a classmate of Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer, and joined Reliance in 1981. After the death of their father in 2002, the two brothers fought publicly, ending with a split of the family business empire in 2005 that was brokered by their mother and saw Mukesh win control of energy-based conglomerate Reliance Industries. Anil, now 51, took control of the telecoms, power and infrastructure businesses. DEALMAKER Mukesh Ambani has been an avid dealmaker. Monday’s deal with BP is expected to boost shares in Reliance Industries, valued at about $70 billion, company watchers said, as it brings in capital and technology. Last year, he struck three shale gas joint ventures in the United States, including a $1.7 billion deal with Atlas Energy to own 40 percent of its Marcellus Shale operations in the eastern United States. Still, not everything he touches turns to gold. Reliance bid $2 billion for 65 percent of troubled Canadian oil sands company Value Creation but did not make it to the finish line. And its $14.5 billion offer to buy bankrupt petrochemicals maker LyondellBasell was rejected. LOW PROFILE A father of three, Mukesh Ambani enjoys watching Bollywood movies in private screenings. By comparison, Anil has been a regular on the social circuit with his wife, a former Bollywood actress. Mukesh’s wife, Nita, is trained in Indian classical dance and runs Mumbai’s Dhirubhai Ambani International School, popular with the city’s elite. She also co-owns the Indian Premier League cricket team Mumbai Indians, for which the Ambanis paid $111 million in 2008. A member of Mumbai’s prosperous Gujarati business community, Mukesh Ambani in 2010 said he would take a two-thirds pay cut after the Indian prime minister commented on “vulgar salaries.” But despite a staid image, Mukesh gave his wife a luxury private jet for her birthday in 2007. Late last year he moved his five-member family — and scores of servants — into a $1 billion, 27-storey home, featuring three rooftop helipads, that towers over south Mumbai. Monday’s deal underscored his penchant for the big. “Mukesh Ambani likes to play only on big platforms, and with this deal he has again shown the desire and hunger in him to take Reliance into a different paradigm,” said Jagannadham Thunuguntla, head of research SMC Global Securities in New Delhi. (Editing by Tony Munroe and Jane Merriman)

Read the full article →

Euro Advance To Be Short-Lived, British Pound Rallies Ahead Of BoE Minutes

February 18, 2011

Euro Advance To Be Short-Lived, British Pound Rallies Ahead Of BoE Minutes

Read the full article →

Euro Advance To Be Short-Lived, British Pound Rallies Ahead Of BoE Minutes

February 18, 2011

Euro Advance To Be Short-Lived, British Pound Rallies Ahead Of BoE Minutes

Read the full article →

Swiss Franc Reversal Gathers Pace, British Pound To Trend Sideways

February 16, 2011

Swiss Franc Reversal Gathers Pace, British Pound To Trend Sideways

Read the full article →

Video: Silva Says Banks May Spark `Civil Unrest’ Over Bonuses

February 15, 2011

Feb. 15 (Bloomberg) — Ralph Silva, a strategist at Silva Research Network, comments on bonuses at British banks and Barclays Plc’s annual profit. The U.K.’s third-largest bank reported full-year net income that beat analyst estimates as writedowns shrank and investment-banking profit almost doubled. Silva speaks with Francine Lacqua on Bloomberg Television’s “On The Move.”

Read the full article →

Video: `King’s Speech’ Sweeps Baftas Before Assault on Oscars

February 14, 2011

Feb. 14 (Bloomberg) — Bloomberg’s Louise Beale reports on the outlook for financing of British films after “The King’s Speech” won seven British Academy Film Awards, or Baftas, in London last night. Linzie Janis also speaks on Bloomberg Television’s “Global Connection.”

Read the full article →

Video: Dalton Says Egypt Protests Echo Iran’s 1979 Revolution

February 11, 2011

Feb. 11 (Bloomberg) — Richard Dalton, a former British ambassador to Iran who consults with the London-based Chatham House policy-advisory group, talks about parallels between protests in Egypt and the revolution in Iran in 1979. He speaks with Maryam Nemazee on Bloomberg Television’s “The Pulse.”

Read the full article →

FOREX: British Pound Falls Ahead of Bank of England Rate Decision

February 10, 2011

FOREX: British Pound Falls Ahead of Bank of England Rate Decision

Read the full article →

FOREX: British Pound Gains on Hawkish BOE Hopes, Aussie Dollar Slips

February 7, 2011

FOREX: British Pound Gains on Hawkish BOE Hopes, Aussie Dollar Slips

Read the full article →

FOREX: British Pound Gains on Hawkish BOE Hopes, Aussie Dollar Slips

February 7, 2011

FOREX: British Pound Gains on Hawkish BOE Hopes, Aussie Dollar Slips

Read the full article →

Euro Reversal To Gather Pace, British Pound Rally Tapers Off

February 3, 2011

Euro Reversal To Gather Pace, British Pound Rally Tapers Off

Read the full article →

US Dollar at Risk of Further Losses vs British Pound, Yen

February 2, 2011

US Dollar at Risk of Further Losses vs British Pound, Yen

Read the full article →

FOREX: British Pound May Rebound on Bank of England Minutes

January 26, 2011

FOREX: British Pound May Rebound on Bank of England Minutes

Read the full article →

Forex: British Pound Rallies as the Bank of England Minutes Reveals a 6-3 Split Amongst Officials in January

January 26, 2011

Forex: British Pound Rallies as the Bank of England Minutes Reveals a 6-3 Split Amongst Officials in January

Read the full article →

Swiss Franc Rally Gathers Pace, British Pound To Face Additional Headwinds

January 25, 2011

Swiss Franc Rally Gathers Pace, British Pound To Face Additional Headwinds

Read the full article →

Robert Lenzner: People Don’t Imagine The Worst Until It’s Upon Them

January 18, 2011

“I believe that people will not imagine the worst until it’s upon them.” These are Canadian mining mogul Frank Giustra’s words of wisdom at the start of 2011 about the fate of the dollar, and America’s burgeoning financial difficulties. This is a lesson for investors everywhere. Don’t deny reality. Deal with painful policy decisions now. No one thought that U.S. subprime mortgages would infect the entire planet. But, had the central banks of the U.S. and Europe not responded to the emergency with trillion dollar dollops of emergency cash, emergency guarantees and emergency loans, we might have experienced a global depression. No one realized that AIG’s $500 billion credit default swaps — which were not hedged with even a dollar of insurance — were financial hari kari, corporate suicide by an excess that threatened the very fabric of all markets. No one understood that Citigroup’s off-balance-sheet financial engineering — mortgage backed bonds leveraged by selling worthless commercial paper to unsuspecting central banks — meant the nation’s largest bank was insolvent. So, what overhanging financial problems have we been “kicking the can down the road?” Meaning, what pending matters have we waited until the last possible moment to deal with? Americans seem unconcerned by European sovereign debt problems and the cost of the crisis to the European banking community, like the leading German, Spanish, French and British banks, which have trillions on the line to the sovereign debtors. State governments have been “kicking the can down the road” of their financial condition and now must face painful cuts in services as well as a showdown with public service unions over the cost of benefits like Medicaid in New York State which has $63 billion in unfunded liabilities. The estimate of unfunded public pension fund liabilities nationwide is $2.5 trillion to $3.0 trillion — and there are no feasible plans to deal with this extraordinary problem. Some states are selling assets (Arizona is selling its capitol building) and leasing them back just to have funds to pay the current expenses. This is the classic case of “kicking the can down the road,” and cannot go on forever if the infrastructure of these states is not improved. Then, there the nation’s mortgage debt, which is larger than the current market value of many millions of homes. There is no bold solution for the prospect of declining home prices. This amounts to a pure depression in the home building industry. Did you know that 40% of the increase in jobs during boom years came from the construction industry? Lastly, there’s China, where inflation is higher than reported, where unrest is growing, where real estate companies are in financial trouble, and where official statistics are looked at circumspectly. The rush to invest in China could be causing problems not well understood in the west.

Read the full article →

Forex: British Pound Extends Advance as U.K. Consumer Prices Soar 3.7 Percent

January 18, 2011

Forex: British Pound Extends Advance as U.K. Consumer Prices Soar 3.7 Percent

Read the full article →

Euro Outlook Remains Bearish, British Pound Tests Downward Trend

January 11, 2011

Euro Outlook Remains Bearish, British Pound Tests Downward Trend

Read the full article →

Forex: Euro, British Pound Rally As U.K. PMI Manufacturing and Euro-Zone CPI Estimate Tops Expectations

January 4, 2011

Forex: Euro, British Pound Rally As U.K. PMI Manufacturing and Euro-Zone CPI Estimate Tops Expectations

Read the full article →

U.S. Dollar Rallies Ahead of FOMC Minutes, British Pound Maintains Downward Trend

January 3, 2011

U.S. Dollar Rallies Ahead of FOMC Minutes, British Pound Maintains Downward Trend

Read the full article →

Canadian Dollar At Risk For Reversal, British Pound To Maintain Downward Trend

January 3, 2011

Canadian Dollar At Risk For Reversal, British Pound To Maintain Downward Trend

Read the full article →

Swiss Franc Strength Risks SNB Intervention, British Pound Searches For Support

December 28, 2010

Swiss Franc Strength Risks SNB Intervention, British Pound Searches For Support

Read the full article →

Forex: Euro, British Pound to Face Increased Selling Pressure as Debt Concerns Rattle the Markets

December 17, 2010

Forex: Euro, British Pound to Face Increased Selling Pressure as Debt Concerns Rattle the Markets

Read the full article →

No Pre-Nup, Big Problems? Hurley Could Lose Millions In Divorce

December 15, 2010

Liz Hurley is set to get a ‘quickie’ divorce from husband Arun Nayar, the Daily Mail is reporting–a move that will ensure she doesn’t lose her multi-millon-dollar fortune. Despite earlier Daily Mail reports that the British actress, 45, stood to lose substantial amounts in the divorce, because she and her Indian businessman husband, 46 did not have a pre-nup, the paper is now reporting a source as having told Indian reporters at the couple’s home in Mumbai, “It will be an amicable settlement with no party giving out large portions of money to anybody. Liz doesn’t want Arun’s money and neither is Arun interested in her wealth.” Hurley’s fortune, which is reportedly substantially larger than her husband’s, includes a £4.3 million farmhouse in South-West England and a £2.5 million townhouse in London , which she co-owns with former boyfriend Hugh Grant. In cases where one spouse is wealthier than the other and there is no pre-nuptial agreement, the poorer spouse can claim for a piece of the richer spouse’s money. Though it’s unlikely that Nayar would have gotten half of her money, he could have demanded other significant divorce spoils–a house, for example. Hurley and Nayar, who were married in 2007 in luxe ceremonies that spanned two continents, are set to split amid allegations that Hurley cheated.

Read the full article →

Will U.K. Jobless Claims Lead to a Sell Off in the British Pound?

December 14, 2010

Will U.K. Jobless Claims Lead to a Sell Off in the British Pound?

Read the full article →

Swiss Franc Rallies The Most Since September, British Pound Lags Behind

December 14, 2010

Swiss Franc Rallies The Most Since September, British Pound Lags Behind

Read the full article →

Euro To Test 200-Day SMA, British Pound Pares Decline As BoE Maintains Current Policy

December 9, 2010

Euro To Test 200-Day SMA, British Pound Pares Decline As BoE Maintains Current Policy

Read the full article →

U.S. Dollar Extends Decline as NFP’s Disappoint, British Pound Maintains Current Range

December 3, 2010

U.S. Dollar Extends Decline as NFP’s Disappoint, British Pound Maintains Current Range

Read the full article →

Ben Kerschberg: Corporate Executives: Get Ready for a Billion Dollar Lawsuit

December 2, 2010

I recently spoke with the Managing Counsel of a publicly traded multinational corporation with a market cap well over $150 billion and operations on every continent. Although he had read a recent federal court of appeals opinion about the Alien Tort Statute (“ATS”), he admitted that he had little idea what it meant for his company in either the short or long term. In Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum , the Second Circuit held that corporations cannot be held liable for violations of customary international law under the ATS, thereby reversing a well-established trend of aliens suing corporate entities in U.S. federal courts for alleged human rights violations. However, Kiobel is hardly, as some observers have incorrectly hailed it, the blockbuster opinion that spells the end of the multi-billion dollar ATS litigation industry. On the contrary, those same suits will still proceed, but their cross-hairs will shift from corporations to the individuals who serve them. A Look Back: How Corporations Came to Be Sued by Aliens in Federal Court The ATS is a relic of the Federal Judiciary Act of 1789 that was intended to allow non-U.S. citizens to seek redress in American courts for violations of the law of nations (i.e., customary international law) such as piracy, attacks on ambassadors, and violations of rights of safe passage. The ATS remained dormant for 200 years until 1980, when the Second Circuit revived it in Filartiga v. Pena Irada , a sweeping opinion that held that the ATS confers jurisdiction over tort actions brought by aliens (only) for violation of customary international law including war crimes against humanity. Filartiga gave rise to an abundance of litigation in federal district courts limited to suits against individuals, thereby reflecting one of the major trends in the international human rights movement of the post-WWII era. In 1999, however, federal courts began to allow hundreds of ATS suits alleging that a corporation — a “juridical” person — could also be an enemy of mankind. Kiobel and the Resurgence of Individual Liability under the ATS The Second Circuit’s recent opinion in Kiobel has closed for now the window used by plaintiffs to sue corporations under the ATS. However, it simultaneously turned the clock back 30 years by encouraging plaintiffs once again to target corporate directors and executives for such billion dollar suits. These suits will now become the norm among groups and plaintiffs’ lawyers putatively advocating under the aegis of human rights. In Kiobel , residents of Nigeria claimed that Dutch, British, and Nigerian corporations that were engaged in oil exploration aided and abetted the Nigerian government in committing violations of customary international law. They sought damages under the ATS. The federal district court allowed their claims with respect to aiding and abetting arbitrary arrest and detention; crimes against humanity; and torture or cruel, inhuman, and degrading treatment. These claims were fair game. In light of the importance of the issues at stake, the trial court voluntarily certified its entire order for interlocutory (i.e., provisional) appeal to the Second Circuit. The Second Circuit held that corporations cannot be held liable for violations of customary international law. The court reasoned that the scope of liability — “who is liable for what” — must be determined by “specific, universal, and obligatory” norms of international (not domestic) law and that “corporate liability is not a discernible — much less a universally recognized — norm of customary international law.” At the same time, the Court explicitly reminded both plaintiffs and individual corporate officers and directors alike that “nothing in [its] opinion limits or forecloses suits under the ATS against the individual perpetrators of violations of customary international law — including the employers, managers, officers, and directors of a corporation. . . .” Indeed, no one questions that individual liability for alleged violations of human rights — including for violations committed by those individuals’ corporations — is precisely the sort of “specific, universal, and obligatory” norm that the Second Circuit and other federal courts recognize. The Nuremberg Trials: The Root of Individual Liability in the International Human Rights Movement The court accorded particular weight to no less than the Nuremberg Tribunals. The Tribunals explicitly refused to hear any claims against corporate defendant I.G. Farben, which, in close participation with the Nazi State, manufactured Zykon B, an insecticide knowingly used as a lethal asphyxiating agent in the gas chambers at Auschwitz, yet charged its individual executives with war crimes. The principle invoked by the Second Circuit in Kiobel was stated poignantly by Justice and U.S. Chief Prosecutor at Nuremberg Robert H. Jackson 75 years ago: “Crimes against international law are committed by men, not by abstract entities, and only by punishing individuals who commit such crimes can the provisions of international law be enforced.” Some suits brought under the ATS are legitimate. Yet corporate counsel generally deem the jurisdictional reach of the statute as having given rise to little more than a cottage industry of thousands of frivolous suits filed in often successful attempts to obtain 9-figure verdicts rather than face the uncertainty of complex, newsworthy trials with the specter of billion dollar jury verdicts. A Final Word of Caution: Re-Aiming Litigation Cross-Hairs on Individual Directors, Officers, Managers, and Employees Kiobel does nothing to deter the trend described above. On the contrary, the Second Circuit guides plaintiffs to their new — yet very old and once familiar — targets of choice: individual directors, officers, managers, and employees of those same corporations. Corporate executives and general counsel must institute proactive policies based on a detailed understanding of the ATS and relevant precedent in order to keep their companies far from suspicion while doing business abroad — and thereby keeping themselves from being named as individual defendants in lengthy cases with devastating costs. ______________________________________________________________________ Ben Kerschberg is a Founder and the Chief Operating Officer of Consero Group LLC . He previously clerked for the Honorable Gilbert S. Merritt, Chief Judge of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. Consero’s Corporate Counsel Forum 2010 will take place December 5-7 in Boca Raton, Florida.

Read the full article →