community

Goldman, Buffett Start $500 Million Program to Aid Small U.S. Businesses

November 17, 2009

By Robert Schmidt and Christine Harper Nov. 17 (Bloomberg) — Goldman Sachs Group Inc. , under fire in Washington for setting aside billions of dollars for bonuses a year after getting a taxpayer bailout, said it’s teaming up with Warren Buffett to provide assistance to 10,000 small businesses in the U.S. The $500 million charitable effort coincides with one of the Obama administration’s top economic priorities: spurring hiring at smaller companies. The initiative aims to provide assistance — ranging from counseling to obtaining funding — to 10,000 businesses. Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway Inc . is the largest shareholder in New York-based Goldman Sachs. Goldman Sachs, the most profitable securities firm in Wall Street history, is trying to dispel criticism from lawmakers and pundits who portray the company as the greedy face of a financial industry whose excessive risk-taking fueled the credit crisis. Unlike competitors that make home loans and provide small-business credit lines, more than 90 percent of Goldman Sachs’s pretax earnings this year came from trading and principal investments. “Small businesses play a vital role in creating jobs and growth in America’s economy,” Lloyd Blankfein , Goldman Sachs’s 55-year-old chairman and chief executive officer, said in a statement today. “We are pleased to work with our partners in this initiative to support small business owners, particularly in those underserved communities.” The company has notified President Barack Obama’s administration about the small-business initiative, according to a person familiar with the program. ‘We Apologize’ Blankfein guided his firm to record profits in the first nine months of this year. The firm allocated $16.7 billion for compensation and benefits in the period, or enough to pay each employee $527,192 for nine months’ work. Blankfein, speaking at a conference today sponsored by Directorship magazine, apologized for Goldman Sachs’s role in some of the activities that led to the financial crisis, without providing specifics. “We participated in things that were clearly wrong and we have reason to regret and we apologize for them,” Blankfein said at the New York event. The magazine named him its CEO of the year. The firm’s response to critics has been to try to come up with solutions to the industry’s and the country’s problems, Blankfein said. ‘Doing the Right Thing’ Goldman Sachs leaders ask themselves, “What are we going to do to fulfill our commitment and our obligation to the world to be good allocators of capital and make sure we’re doing the right thing, making sure we’re helping the country pull out of recession, grow businesses that help generate jobs?” Blankfein said. The newly created “10,000 Small Businesses Initiative” will be guided by an advisory council co-chaired by Blankfein, Buffett and Harvard Business School’s Michael Porter . The council will include George Boggs , president and CEO of the American Association of Community Colleges, and Dan Danner , president and CEO of the National Federation of Independent Business. The program will contribute $200 million to local community colleges, universities and other institutions to provide small- business owners with practical business education. Goldman Sachs will invest $300 million through a combination of lending and philanthropic support to community development financial institutions. Buffett’s Investment Buffett, known as the “Oracle of Omaha” for his investing prowess, is the second-richest American. Berkshire, which invests in companies ranging from retailers to insurers, paid $5 billion in September 2008 to acquire preferred stock in Goldman Sachs that pays a 10 percent dividend. Berkshire, based in Omaha, Nebraska, also gained five-year warrants to buy $5 billion of common stock at $115 per share . Goldman Sachs repaid the $10 billion it was given last year under the taxpayer-funded Troubled Asset Relief Program, plus dividends. The firm continues to benefit from federal guarantees on about $21 billion of long-term debt. It was allowed to become a bank holding company to gain Federal Reserve support and was one of the biggest recipients of funds through the government bailout of American International Group Inc. Lawmakers, unions, and media commentators have criticized the firm’s compensation , especially as the economic recovery appears to have rewarded Wall Street more than Main Street. Shrinking Payrolls The unemployment rate in the U.S. rose to a 26-year high of 10.2 percent in October. Payrolls fell by 190,000 last month, according to the Labor Department. “Goldman Sachs seems to salute no flag but their own corporate logo,” Andy Stern , president of the 2.1 million- member Service Employees International Union, said at a rally yesterday in front of Goldman Sachs’s Washington office. He accused the company’s executives of “gorging themselves” on bonuses made possible by tax money from working Americans. Because Goldman Sachs repaid its TARP capital injection earlier this year, the government has no direct say over its pay. The Treasury has subjected seven companies, including Citigroup Inc. and AIG , to compensation restrictions. Goldman Sachs has previously unveiled charitable programs around the time of record employee payouts. ‘Shocking’ Pay In November 2007, a month before awarding bonuses that were the biggest ever in the securities industry, the company announced plans to raise as much as $1 billion for a philanthropic fund called Goldman Sachs Gives. The program was unveiled six months after John Whitehead , who retired as co-chairman of the firm in 1984 and oversaw its foundation, criticized Goldman Sachs’s “shocking” pay and said he’d tried unsuccessfully a year earlier to persuade the firm to donate $1 billion to charity. The fund was formed with a $50 million contribution from Goldman Sachs and $80 million from partners at the firm, each of whom has an account and can guide how the money is spent. In March 2008, the company said it planned to contribute $100 million over five years to provide business education to women in developing nations and elsewhere through an initiative called 10,000 Women. The program was established in 18 countries and has more than 60 partners. Last weekend, Goldman Sachs helped sponsor a Washington party to benefit a human rights group. Held at the home of Juleanna Glover , a principal in former Attorney General John Ashcroft’s consulting business, the event featured women in the media, including journalists from CNN, the Washington Post and NBC News. Buffett’s Gifts Buffett pledged the bulk of his Berkshire shares to Bill Gates’s health and education foundation in 2006. The donation, valued at $30.7 billion at the time, is the largest charitable commitment in history, according to the Chronicle of Philanthropy. Buffett has also raised more than $5 million in the past decade for the Glide Foundation by auctioning off an annual lunch. Buffett’s late wife volunteered at the San Francisco- based charity, which offers food, clothes, shelter and health care to the needy. To contact the reporters on this story: Robert Schmidt in Washington at rschmidt5@bloomberg.net ; Christine Harper in New York at charper@bloomberg.net .

Read the full article →

Obama, Hu to Take Up Trade, Climate Change in `Meeting of Minds’ in China

November 16, 2009

By Edwin Chen and Julianna Goldman Nov. 17 (Bloomberg) — President Barack Obama meets again with his Chinese counterpart, Hu Jintao , today to continue what the U.S. leader called “a meeting of the minds” about how their nations can lead on global issues. During a town-hall session with university students yesterday in Shanghai, Obama said a deeper relationship between the U.S. and China is critical to economic growth in both countries and essential to confronting global issues such as climate change. The agenda will also include discussions on trade, currency, the global economy, North Korea and Iran. In China for his first-ever visit, Obama arrived in Beijing last night and had dinner with the Chinese president at the Diaoyutai State Guesthouse — in the same villa where then- President Richard Nixon stayed during his landmark 1972 visit to China — before more formal meetings later today at which they’ll take up the substantive issues between the two nations. Obama is “trying to reassure Beijing that we want a good constructive relationship, not trade protectionism, and on the other hand we’re trying to reassure Asia that we’re not going to acquiesce in a future Chinese hegemony in the region,” said Ted Carpenter of the Cato Institute. “That’s a delicate balance to put it mildly,” said Carpenter, vice president for defense and foreign policy studies at the Washington-based policy research group. Conciliatory Tone Obama has struck a mostly conciliatory tone toward China during the first half of his eight-day Asian trip. In Shanghai yesterday, Obama told his student audience that the U.S. “insists we do not seek to contain China’s rise.” “On the contrary, we welcome China as a strong and prosperous and successful member of the community of nations — a China that draws on the rights, strengths, and creativity of individual Chinese like you,” he said. Still, the president used the same forum to prod China on human rights and freedom. In addition to speaking to and taking questions from a group of about 400 students selected by their universities, Obama also answered queries submitted via the Internet. That provided him an opening to talk about “universal rights” of freedom of expression and religion for all people and groups “whether they are in the United States, China, or any nation.” Internet Access He also called unfettered Internet access a source of strength for any nation. China, with more than 330 million Internet users, blocks access to Web sites such as the Facebook social network and those dealing with sensitive political issues such as the 1989 Tiananmen Square uprising. “Unrestricted Internet access is a source of strength, and I think, should be encouraged,” Obama said, adding that the criticism he receives in the U.S. “makes me a better leader because it forces me to hear opinions that I don’t want to hear.” Obama focused primarily on areas of cooperation during the hour-long forum and will seek to strengthen those ties in his meetings today, administration officials have said. Climate change was one prominent area in which Obama said the U.S. and China have an opportunity to lead the world together. “Unless both of our countries are willing to take critical steps” to deal with carbon emissions, “we will not be able to resolve it,” Obama said. Peter Morici , a professor of business at the University of Maryland in College Park, Maryland, said “the Obama approach of ‘we’re in this together’ has failed with China” because “the Chinese view foreign policy in terms of national interest, not global community.” If the U.S. caps emissions China will not follow suit, and that will create more manufacturing jobs in China and “an opening to further exploit American weakness,” Morici said. Trade Trade and the global economy are other top issues for Obama while in China, the third stop on a four-nation trip to Asia. He told his audience yesterday that trade between the U.S. and China has driven economic growth in both countries and that a more balanced relationship will provide greater prosperity. “This trade could create even more jobs on both sides of the Pacific,” Obama said. “As demand becomes more balanced it could lead to even broader prosperity.” The administration estimates that every percentage point of increase in U.S. exports to Asia could create 250,000 U.S. jobs, according to Michael Froman , Obama’s deputy national security adviser for international economics. His comments come after the weekend’s Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation forum in Singapore, where some leaders expressed concern about his commitment to free trade. Import Duties Obama decided in September to impose duties of 35 percent on $1.8 billion of automobile tires imported from China. A month later, the U.S. imposed duties of as much as 99 percent on Chinese steel pipe after American producers led by U.S. Steel Corp. complained that the imports were being dumped at below- market prices. While Obama has credited China’s economic stimulus efforts with aiding the global recovery, he said before leaving Washington that he expected to raise the issue of China’s currency peg to the dollar. China has kept the yuan at about 6.83 per dollar since July 2008. Some lawmakers in the U.S. have been calling for the administration to put more pressure on the Chinese, saying the yuan’s value is unfairly undercutting U.S. companies. China’s Comment A spokesman for China’s Ministry of Commerce said yesterday that international pressure for appreciation of the yuan “is not conducive to a global economic recovery and is not fair.” The spokesman, Yao Jian , said at a press briefing in Beijing that China must provide “a stable and predictable environment in terms of macro-economic and exchange rate policies.” In addition to economic issues, Obama’s agenda includes pressing China to take a tougher stance on Iran, which the U.S. says is seeking to develop nuclear weapons capability. China has been reluctant to back more sanctions against the Islamic republic. Over the weekend in Singapore, Russia’s president Dmitry Medvedev and Obama said time was running out for Iran to accept terms of a deal offered by international negotiators and suggested they are moving closer to discussions new sanctions against Iran. China also is a key player in the six-party talks on North Korea’s nuclear weapons program. To contact the reporters on this story: Julianna Goldman in Shanghai at jgoldman6@bloomberg.net ; Edwin Chen in Shanghai at echen32@bloomberg.net

Read the full article →

Patient Wait Times Would Increase as Doctor Shortage Meets Obama Overhaul

November 13, 2009

By Pat Wechsler Nov. 13 (Bloomberg) — President Barack Obama’s health overhaul, aiming to add 36 million Americans to the insurance rolls, will worsen a family-doctor shortage, triggering longer waits for office visits and crowded emergency rooms. “This is already a catastrophic crisis,” said Joseph Stubbs, president of the Philadelphia-based American College of Physicians , the second-largest doctor’s group in the U.S. “Now we’re talking 30 million more people who will want to see a doctor. The supply of doctors just won’t be there for them.” Underserved areas in the U.S. currently need 16,679 more primary-care physicians to reach a “medically appropriate” target of 1 for every 2,000 residents, U.S. data shows. The health-care overhaul bills before Congress would raise pay for family doctors, increase residency training and forgive school debt to help meet that deficit. Those measures, though, will take years to make a difference, said Stubbs , who also works as an internist in Albany, Georgia. More family doctors are needed to cut health costs through early diagnosis and prevention, and increase access to medical care, Obama said in a June 15 speech to the American Medical Association meeting in Chicago. The Massachusetts health-care initiative shows what can go wrong if the primary-care system isn’t fixed simultaneously with the start of universal coverage, said Allan Goroll , a professor of medicine at Harvard Medical School in Boston. Massachusetts passed a law in 2006 that has increased the percentage of insured to 97.4 percent of its population, the highest in the U.S., from 93.6 percent. Waiting Times Rise The average waiting time to see a family-medicine doctor in Boston, a city with 14 teaching hospitals, is 63 days, the most among 15 cities in a 2009 survey by Merritt Hawkins & Associates, a recruiting and research firm in Irving, Texas. People in Los Angeles waited 59 days, while those in Miami saw doctors in 7 days, the survey found. Boston’s longer wait was “driven in part by the health- care reform initiative,” the report said. Even before the initiative, there was a shortage of primary care doctors in Massachusetts, said Harvard’s Goroll, who is also an internist at Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston. As many as half of doctors in the state have closed their practices to new patients, forcing many of the newly insured to turn to emergency rooms for care, he said. “The primary lesson of health-care reform in Massachusetts is that you can’t increase the number of insured unless you have a strong primary-care base in place to receive them,” Goroll said. “Without that foundation of primary care, Massachusetts has ended up with higher costs and people going to emergency rooms when they can’t find a doctor.” Spending to Double Per-capita health spending is projected to double in Massachusetts by 2020, according to a June report by the state. Insurance premiums rose 10 percent this year, Massachusetts Health and Human Services Secretary JudyAnn Bigby wrote in an Oct. 21 New England Journal of Medicine article. There were 303,749 primary-care doctors in the U.S. at the end of 2007, according to data in a 2009 American Medical Association report. That number rose 11 percent from 2000 to 2007, falling behind a 13 percent jump among other doctors, the Chicago-based group said. The shortage in primary care isn’t uniform across the nation, according to U.S. Health Resources and Services Administration data from all 50 states, which shows 6,215 designated shortage areas. In general, suburban and wealthier urban areas tend to be well stocked with family doctors, and rural areas and inner cities are short. Underserved Communities The federal government designates regions as being underserved based on per capita numbers. To be designated, a region needs to have less than one family doctor per 3,500 residents. Using just this ratio, the communities have 7,413 fewer primary-care doctors than they need, the HRSA said. An adequate level — established by public health clinicians and staff as affording “appropriate” access to health care — is 1 for every 2,000 residents, according to the HRSA, which gathers the data. That brings the deficit to 16,679. In most industrialized nations, including Germany and the U.K., there is one primary-care physician for every specialist, according to the Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development in Paris. The U.S. ratio is closer to one to three, according to the AMA. The U.S. will need another 35,000 to 46,000 primary-care doctors within 15 years as the population ages, the American College of Physicians said in a 2009 report. Living Longer “We are living longer and living more often with chronic disease,” said Cathy Schoen of the health-care research group the Commonwealth Fund in New York. “Someone needs to be in the center of care and know the whole patient if care is to be coordinated and efficient.” Becoming a family doctor — once the icon of U.S. medical care, from Norman Rockwell paintings to TV’s Marcus Welby — has lost its luster over the past decade, primarily because these physicians earn, at most, half of what specialists make, Harvard’s Goroll said. In the late 1990s, Medicare and Medicaid changed the reimbursement system to compensate medical procedures at a higher rate than management and evaluation of patients, something family doctors focus on in their practices. The emphasis on procedures and technology led many prospective doctors to choose careers in higher-paying radiology, orthopedic surgery, anesthesiology and dermatology, according to Goroll. Average Salary The average salary for family physicians grew 18 percent over five years, or about 3.6 percent annually, according to data from Merritt Hawkins , the recruiting firm. That compares with a 46 percent increase, or 9.3 percent a year, for orthopedic surgeons. Family practice pays an average of $173,000 a year, a 2009 survey by Merritt Hawkins shows. This compares with $391,000 for a radiologist, $481,000 for an orthopedic surgeon, $344,000 for an anesthesiologist and $297,000 for a dermatologist. Given that the typical medical student debt is about $140,000, the income disparities prove to be “strong disincentives for younger physicians,” according to a 2009 report from the American College of Physicians. In a 2008 survey of third-year medical residents, 21 percent said they planned to pursue careers in general internal medicine, the equivalent of primary care, according to the American College of Physicians. That’s down from 54 percent in 1998. The rest were headed to subspecialties, such as oncology, gastroenterology and infectious disease. Medical-School Changes Medical schools at Duke University in Durham, North Carolina, and Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore are attempting to change the trend by creating primary-care residency programs that let students work with families outside the hospital setting. At Duke, a family medicine leadership residency was started three years ago to let students practice “21st-century primary care,” working in outpatient clinics and in communities, said Lloyd Michener , who is the chair of the department of community and family medicine at the medical school. “It brings in an element of public health since residents are assessing both the needs of the patients and the community they are working in,” said Barbara Sheline , the school’s assistant dean for primary care. A four-year urban health residency that begins in July 2010 at Hopkins combines medicine and pediatric training at community clinics and in schools. Students in the Community Duke also has approved a new primary-care curriculum for its medical students, allowing up to nine to choose work in community clinics during their four years. The university will offer the program to three or four students this year on a pilot basis, then accept applications for the slots in the 2010-2011 academic year. The program will offer scholarships to give students the option of choosing a career in primary care without worrying about a large educational debt, Sheline said. “For most of us, primary care is a calling,” Michener said. “But I see medical students turn down the idea of primary care for very thoughtful reasons about wanting a family themselves and not wanting to work all the time.” Hopkins’ medical school also converted to a curriculum this year emphasizing “individualized medicine, based on genetic makeup and history, environmental influences and lifestyle,” said Charles Wiener , director of Hopkins’ residency programs and vice chairman of the department of medicine. ‘Knowing the Individual’ “Primary care knows the individual best,” Wiener said. “I’m hopeful this will spark more interest among students.” Health-care overhaul legislation in the U.S. House and Senate offers medical school debt forgiveness for those who choose primary care. The bills also call for a redistribution of unused residency spots to primary care and general surgery. They also attempt to redress the pay inequity between primary care and specialty medicine by giving family doctors a payment bonus of between 5 and 10 percent annually for at least the next five years. This is on top of a restructuring of Medicare payments beginning in 2010 by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. The agency is taking money away from specialists such as cardiologists and radiologists to fund a 6 percent to 8 percent increase in reimbursement for office visits to family physicians phased in over four years. The House version would also provide federal funds to increase Medicaid primary-care payments. Medicaid Expansion By allowing those living at 150 percent of the federal poverty level to qualify, the overhaul would expand the ranks of Medicaid by more than 10 million people in 2015. These are populations that typically don’t have family doctors and frequently have been living with untreated chronic illness, said Lori Heim , president of the Leawood, Kansas-based American Academy of Family Physicians , representing 94,000 doctors and medical students. Heim, who is also a family doctor at Scotland Memorial Hospital in Laurinburg, North Carolina, said she cared for a man in his 40s with untreated high blood pressure. Although the patient had a full-time job, he had no health insurance and no primary care doctor. He was already suffering from permanent liver and heart damage, and had to be admitted to the intensive care unit, she said. “Instead of a family doctor putting him on generic blood pressure pills years ago that would have cost less than $100 a year, I had to put him in the ICU, which alone will run several thousand dollars,” Heim said. “Down the road, he may need dialysis. This is a working example of why costs keep going up and what happens when there aren’t enough family physicians.” To contact the reporters on this story: Pat Wechsler at pwechsler@bloomberg.net .

Read the full article →

New Members Elected to Linux Foundation Technical Advisory Board

November 11, 2009

Peer-Elected Board Brings Community Perspective to Advancement of Linux

Read the full article →

Whitestone REIT Announces Third Quarter 2009 Results

November 10, 2009

HOUSTON, Nov. 10, 2009 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Whitestone REIT, a public, non-traded REIT that acquires, owns and operates Community Centered Properties(TM), which are visibly located properties in established or developing culturally diverse neighborhoods, today announced financial results for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009.

Read the full article →

Obama Heads to Fort Hood `Heartbroken’ Following Shooting That Killed 13

November 10, 2009

By David Wethe and Edwin Chen Nov. 10 (Bloomberg) — A “heartbroken” President Barack Obama visits Fort Hood, Texas, today to participate in a memorial service for 13 people killed there by a U.S. Army psychiatrist, vowing to ensure “something like this doesn’t happen again.” After the Nov. 5 shooting rampage, Obama juggled his schedule in order to make today’s ceremony, thereby delaying his departure for Asia by a day. He is now scheduled to leave Nov. 12 for an eight-day trip to Japan, Singapore, China and South Korea, his first to Asia as president. Obama said in an interview with ABC News yesterday that he wants to go to the central Texas military base to “personally express the incredible heartbreak that we all feel.” “The second thing that I can absolutely commit to is that we are going to complete this investigation, and we are going to take whatever steps are necessary to make sure that something like this doesn’t happen again,” he said. Vice President Joe Biden is scheduled to attend a memorial service today at Fort Lewis, Washington, for U.S. troops killed in Afghanistan Oct. 27. At Fort Hood, the president and first lady Michelle Obama will meet privately with families of the dead as well as the wounded soldiers and their families. Obama then will address the greater Fort Hood community. Earlier Mass Murder The mass shootings at the base put the community at the center of a national tragedy for the second time in less than two decades. On the afternoon of Oct. 16, 1991, George Hennard shook the neighboring military town of Killeen when he drove his pickup truck through the plate-glass window of the Luby’s Cafeteria in the middle of the town and opened fire, killing 23 people before taking his own life. Eighteen years later and about 10 miles away in neighboring Fort Hood , the largest military base in the U.S., Major Nidal Malik Hasan , a psychiatrist who was scheduled to deploy shortly to Afghanistan, fired on fellow soldiers in a crowded medical center. The Nov. 5 shooting rampage also wounded 30. This tragedy “will have a long-lasting effect,” state Representative Sid Miller, Republican of Stephenville, told reporters two days after the incident. “This community is still reeling from the 1991 Luby’s shooting.” ‘Bloodbath in Killeen’ The Houston Chronicle , reporting witness accounts of the 1991 shooting the next day in an article headlined “Bloodbath in Killeen,” said Kennard, 35, “calmly and methodically strolled through the cafeteria, randomly shooting innocent people as they crouched under tables. Often he would stick the gun at a victim’s head or body and fire.” The newspaper cited a police officer saying the restaurant afterward looked like a slaughterhouse or a scene from a movie. “There are bodies scattered throughout the entire cafeteria,” the officer said. “The floor is covered with broken glass, bullet holes, bullet fragments, blood. It’s almost a surrealistic, nightmarish scene.” Until the massacre at Virginia Tech University in 2007, the Luby’s incident was the worst mass shooting in U.S. history. Luby’s has changed names several times and is now a Chinese restaurant called Yank Sing Buffet. Robert Keating, a Killeen resident for the past 20 years, has observed the updates and says no change to the building would be enough to lure him back. “Once that happened, I never did go back in the doors,” said Keating, 59, who moved with his wife to her hometown of Killeen after retiring in 1989. “You go by there. You know exactly what happened,” he said. One-Time Home to Elvis Killeen is in central Texas about 60 miles north of Austin, the capital. Its population was pegged at 86,911 at the time of the 2000 census. The town is famous for having been a one-time home to Elvis Presley and Chicago Bears defensive tackle Tommie Harris Jr. Keating, who served in the military, said roughly nine out of 10 residents in the area are now in the military or used to be. “It’s a good place to live if you can deal with the military,” he said. “I don’t see myself going anywhere else.” Julian Lee, 31, served two years in the military starting in 1999 and lived in Fort Hood. He likes the area and doesn’t think the Fort Hood shooting should hurt Killeen’s image. “That’s not our fault; that’s Fort Hood’s fault,” Lee said as he sat outside the former Luby’s restaurant smoking a cigarette. “I feel a connection to this area.” Seeking Answers At a chapel service in Fort Hood on Nov. 8, parishioners gathered to mourn and search for answers. Many found themselves asking the same question they asked in 1991. “To me, the focus is how do we bring people together with reality of what’s going on and how do we support and stand and encourage them at this time?” Colonel Frank Jackson, an Army chaplain, told reporters before leading the service at the 73rd Street Chapel. Keating said he is confident people around town ultimately will get over the incident. “You just move on,” he said. “It’s just something that unfortunately happens.” To contact the reporters on this story: David Wethe &cle; in Killeen, Texas, at dwethe@bloomberg.net Edwin Chen in Washington at EChen32@bloomberg.net

Read the full article →

Tishman BlackRock Near Restructuring or Sale of New York’s Stuyvesant Town

November 9, 2009

By Hui-yong Yu, Jonathan Keehner and Oshrat Carmiel Nov. 9 (Bloomberg) — Tishman Speyer Properties LP and BlackRock Realty , the owners of Manhattan’s Stuyvesant Town- Peter Cooper Village, moved closer to restructuring $3 billion in debt on the apartment complex as the property verges on default, Fitch Ratings said. The companies turned the loan over to mortgage servicer CW Capital on Nov. 6, Fitch said in a statement. Fitch said the property doesn’t produce enough income to pay the debt and a reserve fund probably will be depleted by year-end. A sale is more likely than a restructuring because the complex has lost so much value, said Kevin O’Shea , managing partner and head of the real estate practice at the law firm Allen & Overy. “We requested that the joint venture’s loan be moved to special servicer in order to facilitate negotiations on a restructuring of the debt load,” said Bud Perrone , a Tishman Speyer spokesman. “The loan is not in default.” The biggest holders of the securitized mortgage are Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the government-owned home-loan finance companies. Freddie Mac has said it doesn’t expect to lose money on the bonds backed by the property. Tishman Speyer and BlackRock paid $5.4 billion for Stuyvesant Town in November 2006, near the top of the market, in the biggest deal in New York residential real estate history. They counted on increasing rents but were blocked by a tenant lawsuit and rising costs. Since 2007, U.S. commercial property values have fallen about 40 percent and apartment rents declined nationwide. The drop in prices and the credit freeze have made refinancing many loans impossible. Wiped Out Stuyvesant Town’s worth has plunged to $1.8 billion, according to Fitch. This means that all the investors besides the senior bondholders are probably wiped out. BlackRock wrote its investment to zero at the end of last year, spokesman Brian Beades said. Beades referred all further questions on Stuyvesant Town to Tishman. The Florida State Board of Administration also wrote off its $250 million investment. Transferring a loan to a servicer means “the occurrence of a default is considered to be imminent,” said O’Shea , who represented the lenders in foreclosures of Boston’s John Hancock Tower and New York’s Sheffield57 condominium. A loan modification is far less likely in this case, said O’Shea. “The borrowers’ equity is currently so far underwater, there’s not much point in extending the loan in the hopes that the market will recover quickly enough to service or repay the debt,” O’Shea said. “You’d probably be just delaying the inevitable.” Loan Transferred The transferring of the loan to special servicing means holders of the $1.4 billion of mezzanine debt, including Fortress Investment Group Inc. and SLGreen Realty Corp., may have lost their money. CW Capital, Tishman and BlackRock are likely to begin talks soon. Among the scenarios that could be pursued include an outright sale, a debt restructuring, and the conversion of bondholder stakes to equity. In a case like this, bankruptcy is another possible path. The resolution could take a different turn should city or state officials get involved. A group of Stuyvesant Town tenants made their own bid for the complex in 2006. The property has about 25,000 residents. Eric Bederman, a spokesman for the city’s department of housing preservation and development, declined to say if the city is in discussions with anyone on the apartment complex. “We’re keeping an eye on it,” said Bederman. Talks Welcomed “We would be glad to talk with the officials in hopes that the debt can be restructured with the special servicer and the residents have affordable places to live,” said Freddie Mac spokeswoman Patti Boerger . “As a bondholder, we don’t have the legal right to make decisions on the restructurings,” she said. Boerger said Freddie Mac hasn’t been contacted by city or state officials about being part of a new ownership entity. “There will be many factors involved in the workout,” including potential legislative changes to rent-stabilization laws, Fitch said on Nov. 6. The $3 billion mortgage doesn’t mature until 2016 and works out to a “low” $267,213 per apartment, based on 11,227 units, Fitch said. Affordable Housing Complex Officials at CW Capital weren’t available for comment after business hours. CW Capital is a unit of Caisse de depot et placement du Quebec, Canada’s largest pension fund. Stuyvesant Town was built in 1945 as an affordable housing complex for World War II veterans and the development was governed by strict rent regulations. MetLife Inc. owned the property, comprised of modest red-brick buildings, for six decades before selling to Tishman and BlackRock. Since taking over the ownership, the Tishman group has marketed the property as a luxury rental complex offering amenities such as a putting green and concierge service. The new owners had aimed to make a profit by raising rents as old tenants moved out and by converting units to market rates. Tenants sued, claiming the owners illegally increased rents on more than one-third of the units because they had received tax breaks for building upgrades and because the project was built with city assistance. After buying Stuyvesant Town, Tishman Speyer repainted the lobbies, installed new automated door keys and new washers and dryers, among other improvements. Court Decision On Oct. 26, four days after New York State’s highest court upheld the tenants’ claim, elected officials representing Manhattan’s East Side wrote to the chief executives of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac urging them to protect the tenants in any loan workout. Tishman Speyer and BlackRock each invested $112.5 million in Stuyvesant Town out of total equity financing of $1.9 billion. They took out a $3 billion mortgage from Wachovia Bank and $1.4 billion of mezzanine debt. About half the equity was set aside in reserves to pay interest, property taxes and such. “Cash flow generated by the property remains insufficient to service the debt,” Fitch said. “Debt service reserves are expected to be depleted by the end of December.” The $3 billion mortgage was bundled with other loans that formed five pools of commercial mortgage-backed securities that were sold in 2007 to investors. Fannie and Freddie are the largest holders of the senior-most classes of the loan. Transfer Scenarios One scenario would be that the lenders don’t foreclose, leave the current ownership in place, and collect all of the rental income after paying operating expenses, including a management fee to the owners, said O’Shea. “All the net revenue generated by the property goes to the lenders now anyway,” he said. Stuyvesant Town could be transferred to the lenders through a consensual or a contested foreclosure, although it’s unlikely because Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac aren’t in the business of owning real estate, O’Shea said. As long as the net revenue is being paid to the lenders, there’s little economic incentive for them to take ownership since such a transfer would trigger a tax equal to 2.625 percent of either the debt being foreclosed or the property’s market value, whichever is higher, said O’Shea. Preserving Community Since the debt is $3 billion and the property is estimated to be worth less than $2 billion, the transfer tax would come to $78.75 million, according to O’Shea’s analysis. Any new financing plan “must preserve” the property for middle-class residents and keep it as a single community, said the letter to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac signed by State Senator Thomas Duane , Congresswoman Carolyn Maloney , Borough President Scott Stringer , Assembly Member Brian Kavanagh and Council Member Daniel Garodnick . The fate of Stuyvesant Town probably won’t be clear for several months. Different classes of bondholders might have competing aims, dragging out any resolution. The senior classes, more insulated from losses, might push for an immediate sale, while more junior bondholders might seek a loan extension in the interests of recouping more value when the real estate market recovers. The legal questions surrounding future rent increases at Stuyvesant Town further cloud the outcome. Jon Searles, a spokesman for Fannie Mae, didn’t immediately respond to requests for comment placed after regular business hours on Nov. 6. To contact the reporters on this story: Hui-yong Yu in Seattle at hyu@bloomberg.net ; Jonathan Keehner in New York at jkeehner@bloomberg.net ; Oshrat Carmiel in New York at ocarmiel1@bloomberg.net

Read the full article →

Raymond J. Learsy: The Price of Oil and the Massacre at Fort Hood

November 8, 2009

The relation between price of oil and the slaughter that took place at Fort Hood is hardly as farfetched as it would appear. In a instructive article (http://www.islamicpluralism.org/1408/take-a-look-at-hasans-old-mosque) that was reprinted as an Op-ed in the NYPost on Saturday Nov 7, one Stephen Suleyman Schwartz Executive Director of the Center of Islamic Pluralism talks about the influences that apparently formed Major Nidal Hassan’s murderous hatred. This in striking contrast to the New York Times’ “see no evil” editorial of the same date, pontificating, “But until investigations are complete, no one can begin to imagine what could possibly have motivated the latest appalling carnage.” Really?! The Times, undeterred, continues with an article on today’s front page, “A Military Therapist’s World: Long Hours, Filled With Pain” replete with the sad song of twisted rationalizations, instructing us that this horrendous act was attributable to professional traumatic stress or as brightly cited in the Times, “Thursday’s rampage has put a spotlight on the stains of their profession and the patients they treat.” Then, in an adjoining article on the same NY Times front page, “Preliminary Fort Hood Inquiry Turns Up No Link To Terrorist Plot” the NY Times is quick to advise us “But, so far, investigators have unearthed no evidence that he was directed or steered into violence”. Then, perhaps in some deference to journalistic objectivity, mentioned almost in passing, that findings were preliminary and that investigators viewed the investigation as fluid. No such mealy mouthed hesitancy in the Schwartz Op-ed. Here we are informed that Hasan regularly attended prayer services at the Muslim Community Center in Silver Spring MD where the main prayer leader Iman Faizul Khan was a friend of Hasan’s as well as holding board membership on the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA). The ISNA, according to Schwartz, the main Wahhabi lobby group in the United States, has a long and disgraceful record of promoting radical Islam. He goes on to advise that it is a group understood to have been established by Saudi Arabia to impose extremism on American Muslims. He continues, telling us that “from a ghastly act, to a Saudi-backed fundamentalist Iman, to a Saudi run designated terror financing charity is not a long trail. That ii is but a small coil of associations that exist in too many US mosques”. He rightfully concludes American Muslims must drive these elements out of their community. “The problem is not traumatic stress, much less Islam. It’s the ideology, the money and and the interests of the Saudi hardliners.” And almost needless to add, the funding comes from the avalanche of money flowing into the coffers of such as Saudi Arabia through the insidious and duplicitous manipulation of oil prices by the cartel producers, with Saudi Arabia as the dominant player and prime beneficiary. This at the cost of hundreds of billions to American consumers in dollars and cents alone, without even beginning to fathom the cost and danger to our society, safety and well being impacted by the radicalization of a segment of our society through Wahhabi dogma while our government and its agencies look the other way, rarely if ever holding the Saudis to account (please see “Oils Massive Price Distortion Militates the Reconvening of the 1970s Federal Oil Price Commision” 11/03/09). Perhaps, just perhaps, in tribute and memory to those who were gunned down at Fort Hood, this could be a wake-up call to the nation.

Read the full article →

Banks Find Consumer Protection Too Big to Fail as Congress Writes New Law

November 3, 2009

By Yalman Onaran Nov. 3 (Bloomberg) — During one of his first meetings about overhauling U.S. financial regulations in February, President Barack Obama had a question for his economic advisers, who included Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner and National Economic Council Director Lawrence Summers . “What about the families?” Obama asked, according to people familiar with the discussions. He then asked them whether they’d read the work of Elizabeth Warren , a Harvard Law School professor and longtime advocate of a national consumer financial protection agency. Michael Barr , a University of Michigan professor who was a Summers aide at the time, jumped in to say he knew Warren’s work. “Well, what do you think about it?” asked the president, according to the accounts of the conversation. “I think it’s a great idea,” Barr, 44, replied. The two debated the merits of such an agency during several meetings over the following three days. Then Obama offered Barr, whose own work included research on the borrowing patterns of low- income households, the job of assistant Treasury secretary for financial institutions. He was confirmed by the Senate in May. Thus an idea that the U.S. banking industry has learned to hate moved a giant step closer to reality. The creation of a consumer protection agency is part of the Obama administration’s plans to enact the most wide-ranging financial regulations since the Great Depression. Following the 1999 decision to overturn the Glass-Steagall Act that separated commercial banks from securities firms, bank lobbyists have been able to shoot down virtually any proposed rule they perceived as unfavorable to their industry, lobbyists and politicians say. Campaign Contributions Banks and securities firms spent $193 million to fund political campaigns for the 2008 elections and raise even more money through events that their trade groups organize. They have successfully fought the administration’s efforts to limit executive pay and are battling against draft legislation governing the $592 trillion market for derivatives. When it comes to consumer banking, the industry’s lobbyists are no longer all-powerful. Banks lost their bid to squelch new credit card rules that Obama signed into law in May. They lobbied for months before a bill that would have forced them to renegotiate mortgages failed in the Senate. Now the banks and their trade associations are lobbying furiously to kill Obama’s plan to create the new financial protection agency, which was approved by the House Financial Services Committee in late October and is likely to face a full House vote by the end of 2009. Influence Lost The different trade groups that represent the industry are also divided over how they want the bill rewritten. They will now shift their struggle to the Senate, which has yet to unveil its version of proposals overhauling financial regulations. “Banks have lost their influence on consumer issues,” says Brian Gardner , an analyst monitoring Washington’s impact on financial services for the brokerage firm Keefe Bruyette & Woods Inc. Gardner says banks will retain their clout when it comes to more complex financial issues such as derivatives. “Folks on Capitol Hill still need to talk to the banks for the expertise on highly technical areas,” Gardner says. Members of Congress who have traditionally been supportive of the banks’ positions are breaking ranks as popular opinion shifts strongly against the institutions. Some 80 percent of the public blames banks and other financial firms for the economic crisis, according to an ABC News-Washington Post poll in March. “Many members of Congress who have been pro-banking and who have done the banks’ bidding are walking more cautiously since the financial meltdown,” says Representative Maxine Waters , a California Democrat. Frank’s Priority Representative Barney Frank , chairman of the Financial Services Committee, says he’s making it his priority to create the new agency to protect consumers. “The existing structure for consumer protection in the financial area, particularly in the area of bank products, has failed miserably,” the Massachusetts Democrat told a news conference in July. Frank has gotten $2.1 million in campaign contributions from financial firms over the past three elections, according to the Center for Responsive Politics, a Washington-based research group. The biggest U.S. banks have a lot at stake. They rely on the relatively stable revenue from consumer lending to balance out the volatility of their investment banking operations. Bank of America Corp. , the largest U.S. bank in terms of assets, and No. 3 Citigroup Inc. got almost half of their revenue from consumer lending, including credit cards, in the first nine months of 2009. Dimon in Washington Harvard’s Warren says the consumer agency she proposes will affect the larger banks disproportionately: “It may cost the community banks some nickels, but the real impact will be on the big banks’ profit model.” JPMorgan Chase & Co. , the second-biggest U.S. bank, got 48 percent of its revenue from consumer lending in the first nine months of 2009. The bank, which was one of the least scathed by the crisis, has stepped up its lobbying. Chief Executive Officer Jamie Dimon now visits the capital twice a month, meeting with administration officials and congressional leaders, up from twice a year in 2006. JPMorgan also added two lobbyists to its Washington staff, which includes former Commerce Secretary William Daley. Jill Blickstein , who was previously chief of staff at the Office of Management and Budget in the Obama administration, was one of the new hires. ‘Weakened Position’ Citigroup and Bank of America are both partially owned by the government following the bailouts of 2008, and have cut their lobbying budgets as a result. The two banks spent a combined $6.6 million to lobby in the first nine months of 2009, down 12 percent from a year earlier, according to congressional disclosures they have filed. “No question that the banks and the rest of the industry are in a weakened position,” says Bruce Thompson , who lobbied Capitol Hill for 22 years on Merrill Lynch & Co.’s behalf. “They used to be able to say, ‘This will hurt us,’ and Congress wouldn’t do it. Now, they laugh at you.” Waters says she has introduced or sponsored dozens of legislative proposals to rein in banking practices. For example, she proposed a 2003 bill that aimed to prevent predatory lending by increasing the amount of information that banks would have to disclose when offering mortgages. All were blocked by bank lobbying, she says. “They manage protecting their interests quite well,” she says. ‘Losing Some Battles’ Consumer advocates agree. “We couldn’t get a vote on bills banks opposed,” says Ed Mierzwinski , the consumer program director at the U.S. PIRG, a federation of state public-advocacy groups that lobby for consumer rights. “Now, they’re losing some battles, winning others.” One fight the banks lost in 2009 was against the creation of a credit card consumer’s bill of rights. The failure came even though financial industry lobbyists, led by the American Bankers Association and the largest individual banks, outnumbered consumer lobbyists by 10 to 1, according to congressional staffers involved in the talks. Credit Card Bill The credit card bill, which was first introduced in 2008 by Representative Carolyn Maloney , a Democrat from New York, passed the House and then died in the Senate amid opposition by banks and credit card companies. Christopher Dodd , the Democrat from Connecticut who is chairman of the Senate banking committee, wasn’t forceful enough, some congressional aides say. Dodd has received more than $8.4 million in election contributions from financial firms since 2005, according to the Center for Responsive Politics. Dodd had introduced several proposals to curb credit card practices in past years and fought the banks’ lobbyists each time, says his spokeswoman, Kirstin Brost . “It took the economic crisis and the 2008 elections for there to be enough support for the bill to be passed this year,” she says. The financial crisis, and Obama’s election, improved the bill’s prospects. Maloney reintroduced the measure in January, revising it to incorporate elements from Obama’s campaign platform, such as restricting how and when credit card issuers can increase interest rates and late-payment penalties. Banks Fought Bill The ABA, along with Bank of America, Citigroup and JPMorgan, argued that the bill would hurt the availability of credit and jack up interest rates on cards. This time around, Dodd followed with a similar proposal cracking down on credit cards himself. The banking committee chairman was humiliated in March when it was disclosed that a bill he sponsored curtailing pay for executives of firms bailed out by the government made an exception for insurance company American International Group Inc. The company’s derivatives arm is based in Connecticut, Dodd’s home state, and the senator is the largest recipient of campaign contributions from AIG. Dodd said the exemption had slipped in during negotiations without his knowledge. In the spring of 2009, Maloney’s bill sailed through Congress, getting 357 votes in the House and 90 in the Senate. Cram-Down Fight Banks also had to fight hard before they succeeded in blocking the so-called cram-down provision proposed by six senators led by Dick Durbin of Illinois and Chuck Schumer of New York this past spring. The proposal, which would have given judges the right to restructure mortgages during a personal bankruptcy trial, was being considered by some of its sponsors as early as 2007. After the government bailed out several of the largest U.S. financial institutions in the fall of 2008, interest in the measure grew. Citigroup, which got the biggest U.S. bailout — $346 billion — decided to back the cram-down provision, reversing its previous stance. In January 2009, Durbin and Schumer held a news conference together with Dodd to announce the bank’s support for the provision. It was the new political circumstances with Obama in power that made the bank change course, former and current Citigroup lobbyists say. Citigroup’s consumer-friendly position gave the bank some positive publicity, too, these people say. Lobbying Block The House passed a version of the cram-down bill in March. In the Senate, Durbin and Schumer needed at least a handful of Republicans to muster 60 votes to avoid a filibuster. Without the banks’ support, that majority wouldn’t materialize. So the two senators started negotiating with the ABA, JPMorgan and two trade groups that represent credit unions. The Independent Community Bankers of America , which represents small banks, later joined the talks along with Wells Fargo & Co. and Bank of America. After a few meetings, the ABA pulled out and lobbied quietly against the cram-down bill, while the ICBA publicly opposed it. The Financial Services Roundtable, which consists of the CEOs of the top 100 U.S. financial firms, coordinated the different groups’ efforts and meetings with members of Congress from both parties, says Scott Talbott , the Roundtable’s chief lobbyist. The provision died in the Senate in April. The lobbyists’ success may be short-lived: In September, Durbin and his allies introduced a new version of the cram-down bill. Next Battle The next big test for the banks is whether they can influence plans to create the new regulatory agency to protect consumer rights. “The administration’s proposal would hurt banks that never made a subprime loan, and yet you’re going to pile a whole new set of regulations and a new regulator on them,” says ABA President Edward Yingling . The ABA has organized its members to write 140,000 letters to congressmen, provided Op-Ed templates for community bank executives who want to write editorials in local newspapers and set up hundreds of meetings between its members and their congresspeople. In September, some 80 bankers from 28 states mingled at an ABA reception at the Madison hotel in downtown Washington, gearing up for meetings with congressmen representing their districts. Floyd Stoner , the ABA’s chief lobbyist, circulated among the crowd, stopping to chat with bankers and dispensing lobbying tips. The pressure from the community banks has had some impact: In October, Frank’s committee revised the original proposal so that small banks can stick with their existing regulators, which will enforce the consumer agency’s rules. Consumer Groups Unite The banks face opposition from consumer groups, which have banded together in a 200-strong coalition to push for the agency. Obama, who himself started in politics as a community organizer, has been sympathetic to their concerns. “In a financial system that has never been more complicated, it has never been more important to have a watchdog function like the one we have proposed,” Obama said in October. The Treasury’s Barr has even appointed a former consumer advocate at the Center for Responsible Lending, Eric Stein , as his deputy in charge of consumer protection. While Barr asked the banks for their opinion of the consumer agency during meetings in March and April, their objections weren’t heeded, according to people familiar with the discussions. He also asked consumer groups and community organizations to weigh in, an unprecedented move when the government considers financial regulation, according to lobbyists. Leveling the Playing Field “The status quo has fundamentally failed consumers and helped to bring us to the brink of financial disaster,” Barr says. “We need to level the playing field.” While banks’ lobbying efforts may have been weakened, their deep pockets still give them willing listeners on Capitol Hill and in the White House, says Joseph Stiglitz , winner of the 2001 Nobel Memorial Prize in Economics. “It comes down to the influence of money on our political process,” the Columbia University economics professor says. Even if Barr levels the playing field and the new agency is created, banks bearing cash still may win the game. To contact the reporter on this story: Yalman Onaran in New York at yonaran@bloomberg.net .

Read the full article →

Chip Conley: Is Conscious Capitalism an Oxymoron?

October 30, 2009

Unconscious Capitalism…we’ve witnessed that. Even Drunk Capitalism may sound more accurate than Conscious Capitalism. But, the truth is we can’t afford to have Capitalism be anything but Conscious given the stakes involved and the power wielded by the world of business. I’ve just come back from the 2nd annual Conscious Capitalism conference in the hill country of Austin. This gathering of CEO’s, entrepreneurs, financiers, and academics gave me some encouragement that those handling the machinery of industry have come to realize that they can’t operate this delicate and powerful equipment while inebriated on short-term ambition and unconscious plundering. What does it mean to be a conscious capitalist? Here’s my stab at a list of 5 basic rules (fueled by some of the discussions at the conference): Focus on the Long-Term . While short-term profits are the milk, smart investors and business execs understand that building a relationship with the cow is far more valuable in the long-term. Warren Buffett asks his CEO’s to operate their businesses as if they were never to be sold or merged for 100 years. And, the academic authors of “Firms of Endearment” have proven that long-term minded companies outperform the S&P 500 by eight times over a ten year period. Bow at the Altar of Purpose . An expansive Purpose that addresses the needs of a broad definition of stakeholders – employees, customers, vendors, the community, the environment, not just investors – provides an animating and attracting force for a company. Proctor & Gamble’s new CEO recently remade the company’s business plan so that it is purely focused on how P&G delivers on its Purpose to all of its broad definition of stakeholders. And, great companies from Southwest (“freedom to fly”) to Apple (“a bicycle for your brain”) have great Purposes that energize those who come into contact with them. Think of Business as a Practice. Few of us see businesspeople as “practicing” their craft like a doctor, lawyer, athlete, musician, or spiritual leader. But, this new generation of leaders at companies like Patagonia (which is now teaching Wal-Mart how to green their supply chain), Whole Foods Markets, and PepsiCo are approaching their work with a level of conscious practice that suggests that they understand there’s a systemic effect in the decisions they make. Kip Tindell, CEO of the Container Store, says that leaders need to understand the size of the “wake” they create based upon the decisions they make. Business leaders can no longer afford to take an unconscious “just do it” approach to how they make decisions. Redefine what “Winning” means . Life and business are all about where you pay your attention. MBA’s have been taught to “manage what you can measure,” but unfortunately, what’s most measurable in life and in business isn’t usually what’s most valuable (think Mastercard’s “Priceless” commercial). Conscious capitalists recognize that intangibles like brand value, culture, and intellectual property are making a mockery of the 500-year old tradition of the balance sheet where these valuable assets can’t be found as line items. The good news is that “valuing intangibles” has become the hottest topic on American business school campuses. Jack Welch’s traditional bottom-line definition of “Winning” has lost its luster. Leverage Loyalty. Leverage has been a dirty word this decade and we’ve even created new recessionary phrases like “America is de-levering herself” (that just sounds painful). Yet, the ultimate leverage in a downturn is loyalty. In today’s “word of mouse” era in which social media and Web 2.0 sites are the primary means that people use to tell their friends and colleagues about their favorite (or least favorite) products or companies, reputation and loyalty have become the primary sustainable competitive advantage for companies. Tech-savvy leaders like Tony Hsieh at Zappos (who has tens of thousands of followers on Twitter) have created an evangelical collection of customers that is leveraged into market share momentum. We may be entering an era of Karmic Capitalism when business realizes what goes around, comes around. Let’s hope that the captains of industry realize that noblesse oblige (nobility is obligated) – a century’s old concept – should be applied to the business world. Since corporations are treated as if they are a body, they should also have some of the obligations of citizenry in terms of what they give back and contribute to the good of society. And, they should be held accountable for operating in this fashion. Chip Conley is the Founder and CEO of Joie de Vivre Hospitality and the author of PEAK: How Great Companies Get Their Mojo From Maslow.

Read the full article →

Homebuyer Tax Credit Would Expand to Existing Owners Under Senate Proposal

October 29, 2009

By Brian Faler and Dawn Kopecki Oct. 29 (Bloomberg) — The Obama administration endorsed plans to extend an $8,000 tax credit for first-time homebuyers, saying it is helping stabilize the nation’s housing market. The tax break, enacted earlier this year as part of an economic stimulus package, has “brought new families into the housing market and contributed to three consecutive months of rising home prices,” Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner said today in a statement . The tax break will expire Nov. 30 unless Congress intervenes. Senate Democrats have announced plans to extend the credit until April 30 while expanding it to include higher-income Americans and some who already own homes. Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus said today the new plan would offer a $6,500 credit for homebuyers who have lived in their prior residence for at least five years. Couples earning up to $225,000 and individuals up to $125,000 would qualify for the break, Baucus said. That’s up from the current $75,000 limit for individuals and $150,000 for couples. “The success of the American economy is closely tied to the success of the housing market – by helping to stabilize the housing market, the homebuyer tax credit has helped to shore up the economy as it begins to recover,” said Baucus. “This would enable an even greater number of potential homebuyers to take the credit.” Millions of renters earn more than $75,000, he said. Democrats have been pushing to include the provisions in an unemployment benefits bill, which has been held up by a disagreement with Republicans over other proposed amendments. Worst Price Drop Lawmakers said they want to prevent home sales from slipping as the economy struggles to recover from the worst drop in home prices since the Great Depression. More than 1.2 million borrowers have claimed $8.5 billion of the $13.6 billion set aside for the homebuyer tax credits this year, according to the Treasury Department. The Democrats’ proposal would extend the credit to home purchases under contract by April 30 so long as they close the sale within 60 days. Those buying homes worth more than $800,000 wouldn’t be eligible for the credit, said Baucus. “We need to target the credit toward those potential home buyers who need it most, and not those home buyers who would have bought the new home without the new credit,” said Baucus. House Plan Any legislation would have to be reconciled with a House unemployment measure approved last month that omits the homebuyer tax provisions and extends jobless benefits only in states with the highest unemployment rates. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi , a California Democrat, is waiting to see the final Senate agreement before deciding whether to support it, said spokesman Nadeam Elshami . While the tax credit speeds demand for homes from next year to this year, it won’t necessarily increase overall sales, said Scott Buchta , head of investment strategy at Guggenheim Securities LLC in Chicago. “They do need to expand the credit to get more people involved, but at the end of the day you are paying people tax dollars to do what they probably would have done anyway,” Buchta said. “If it is passed, home sales of lower-priced homes should continue to hold their ground. However, if it is not passed we will probably see home sales slow down as we wait for natural demand to build up again.” Significant Support Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid , a Nevada Democrat, said yesterday that there is significant support among both parties for the homebuyers’ tax credit. He said the other amendments sought by Republicans are unrelated to the unemployment bill and are designed to embarrass his colleagues. Republicans want to vote on amendments on immigration and to bar funding for the community activist group Acorn . Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell , a Kentucky Republican, agreed that most lawmakers support the unemployment and homebuyer measures. “We’re not that far away from an agreement,” he said yesterday. The $2.4 billion unemployment measure would extend jobless benefits by 14 weeks in all states and provide an additional six weeks of benefits in states with the highest unemployment rates. About 1.9 million Americans will exhaust their unemployment benefits by the end of this year unless Congress acts, the Labor Department said. To contact the reporters on this story: Dawn Kopecki in Washington at dkopecki@bloomberg.com ; Brian Faler in Washington at bfaler@bloomberg.net

Read the full article →

Chad Dobson: Civil Society Sounds Off on IFC Policies in Istanbul

October 28, 2009

On Monday, October 5, the International Finance Corporation (IFC) launched the first of several civil society consultations regarding the review and update of their Policy and Performance Standards on Social and Environmental Sustainability during the World Bank/IMF Annual Meetings in Istanbul. These standards govern how communities and the environment are protected during project implementation and stipulate what information is publicly available for IFC-financed projects. The IFC policy’s influence extends beyond the organization itself as the Performance Standards formed the basis for the Equator Principles, which currently guide over 70% of project finance in emerging markets. The consultation provided an important platform for civil society to highlight on-going concerns within the IFC’s policies and suggest areas where these safeguard policies can be strengthened. A broad range of views were presented by global civil society at the well attended consultation. Key concerns were raised around the issues of contract transparency, development impact reporting and how the notion of broad community support for IFC projects is determined, among others. Contract transparency is essential as the Performance Standards currently lack a meaningful requirement of extractive industry contract disclosure between IFC clients and the host governments. As the policy stands, IFC clients must disclose contracts only when the project generates 10% or more of government revenues. Civil society representatives attending the consultation raised the point that none of the extractive industry projects that have been approved since the 2006 advent of the Performance Standards has met this criteria. Civil society has consistently argued that any contract where the government is a party should be transparent and that public interest outweighs the need for contract confidentiality. The IFC’s problematic method of development impact reporting was an issue of concern as well. Currently, the development impacts are not reported on a project-by-project basis, making it difficult to adequately evaluate the benefits from each individual project. One civil society representative pointed out that “the IFC’s method of reporting leaves much to be desired; the IFC has the responsibility to evaluate and explain how people’s livelihoods and future livelihoods will be affected by each and every project they finance.” Broad community support was another key concern flagged by civil society at the consultation, especially from indigenous peoples representatives. IFC still does not recognize the practice of securing free, prior and informed consent (FPIC) from communities for projects with potential significant impacts. IFC is currently relying on the less stringent “Broad Community Support,” though it does not report how such community support is achieved. Reporting on how IFC ensures that communities express consent for projects would strengthen accountability by considering communities’ opinions when approving risky projects. A Malian representative noted that “community involvement is not merely a matter of providing access to physical documents, but that the IFC must also ensure that information is communicated in a language and manner in which the community can comprehend and use to participate.” The integration of gender into the Performance Standards and climate change were also prevalent issues raised by civil society. A German colleague perhaps summarized the day’s session best when he said that “the IFC places all of the burden of environmental and social safeguards on the client…The whole world is re-regulating and you should too.” Co-authored by Rebecca Harris To learn more about BIC’s campaign on the IFC Policies and Standards Review, please visit our website at www.bicusa.org

Read the full article →

Costa Mesa’s Torelli Realty Adds Four New Team Members and In-House Lending Services

October 28, 2009

COSTA MESA, CA–(Marketwire – October 28, 2009) – Torelli Realty, an independent real estate company focused on buyers and sellers almost exclusively in Costa Mesa, Calif., recently expanded its office to include in-house mortgage services and brought on four new team members specializing in residential sales and lending. “As we continue to lead Costa Mesa in real estate sales, we’ve brought on four phenomenal employees to join us in our growth,” said Valerie Torelli, founder and president of Torelli Realty, one of the few real estate companies located in and dedicated to Costa Mesa properties. “Not only do they have impressive professional backgrounds, but each is a long-time resident of Costa Mesa — an especially important quality for our agents because it enables us to provide the best and most organic client services in our community.

Read the full article →

Costa Mesa’s Torelli Realty Adds Four New Team Members and In-House Lending Services

October 28, 2009

COSTA MESA, CA–(Marketwire – October 28, 2009) – Torelli Realty, an independent real estate company focused on buyers and sellers almost exclusively in Costa Mesa, Calif., recently expanded its office to include in-house mortgage services and brought on four new team members specializing in residential sales and lending. “As we continue to lead Costa Mesa in real estate sales, we’ve brought on four phenomenal employees to join us in our growth,” said Valerie Torelli, founder and president of Torelli Realty, one of the few real estate companies located in and dedicated to Costa Mesa properties. “Not only do they have impressive professional backgrounds, but each is a long-time resident of Costa Mesa — an especially important quality for our agents because it enables us to provide the best and most organic client services in our community.

Read the full article →

Demand for Swine Flu Vaccine Rises, Adding to U.S. Shortage, CDC Says

October 27, 2009

By Meg Tirrell Oct. 27 (Bloomberg) — The swine flu vaccine shortage is boosting demand from Americans concerned they won’t get the product in time to hold off the disease, said Thomas Frieden , director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention . The amount available to doctors and clinics starting this week will have risen to 22.4 million doses from about 14 million on Oct. 21, Frieden said today. The supply is still smaller than needed, he said. A U.S. health official has blamed the shortage on production delays at two drugmakers, and one manufacturer’s failure to gain regulatory approval for its product. President Barack Obama declared swine flu a national emergency Oct. 24. The disease, also known as H1N1 influenza, is widespread across the country and accounts for 411 confirmed deaths and more than 8,200 hospitalizations since Aug. 30, according to the Atlanta-based CDC. Frieden didn’t update the numbers of infected during today’s call. “We are currently in a situation where we have too little vaccine in the community,” Frieden said during a conference call with reporters. “It’s quite likely that too little vaccine is one of the things that’s making people more interested in getting vaccinated.” Health officials said last week the U.S. won’t get the 195 million doses it had planned for by the end of the year. Americans may get 42 million doses by mid-November, 8 million less than earlier U.S. estimates, said Nicole Lurie , Health and Human Services assistant secretary for preparedness and response, in an Oct. 23 telephone interview. Lurie linked the shortage to production delays. Greater Demand “When we have shortages we see an increase in demand,” Frieden said today. “In the next week or so, there will be a significant increase in the perceived and real availability of vaccine.” Frieden said medical authorities still recommend the vaccine be given first to people most at risk of severe infection from swine flu. Children and young adults ages 6 months to 24 years, pregnant women, those with underlying medical conditions and health-care workers are most at risk according to the CDC. ‘Many millions’ of H1N1 cases have occurred in the U.S. since the outbreak began in April, he said Oct. 23. “We wish we had better technology that could produce vaccine in weeks or months, rather than the six to nine months it takes with current, tried-and-true technology,” Frieden said. “It’s challenging with a limited amount of vaccine for a lot of people who want to get vaccinated.” Similar Symptoms While H1N1 produces similar symptoms and outcomes as seasonal flu in most cases, it targets a younger population and can lead to severe illness and death. The seasonal flu kills about 36,000 people a year in the U.S., though the majority of those deaths are in people over the age of 80. Ninety-five children have died from confirmed swine flu since April 2009, more than the pediatric toll for a typical year of influenza, the CDC said on its Web site, which tracks deaths from 28 states that provide data. To contact the reporter on this story: Meg Tirrell in New York at mtirrell@bloomberg.net .

Read the full article →

Scott de Marchi: Who’s Likely to Stick with Obama?

October 27, 2009

If President Obama were a product, what would it mean to be loyal to him? His job approval rating went from 62% in the second quarter of 2009 to 53% in the third quarter, a 9-point drop that ranks as the steepest reported decline for a newly elected President. A year ago “Yes We Can” and “Hope” were familiar signs and slogans . To see who’s abandoning their support for Obama now, pollsters often ask how voters feel about the state of the economy or the health care debate. To really understand who’s likely to support the President, however, you may have better luck if you look at how they shop, drive, and eat. In choosing what to buy or believe, you face choices about happiness now or in the future, the possibility of a bad outcome, or whether your choice somehow affects others. In deciding what to consume or what cause to support, you can make decisions by gathering a lot of information, looking to others for guidance, or simply deciding to go with what you’ve always done before. We call the way people approach decision-making their TRAITS, an acronym for Time, Risk, Altruism, Information, meToo, and Stickiness. In our research, we use decisions people make every day to measure their decision-making approaches. We measure a taste for Risk by studying whether a person gambles, smokes, drives fast, or plays risky sports. People score high on our Information measure by buying more books, consulting more sources for financial information, and searching out news on the web and cable. Rating whether a person is high on meToo depends on the degree they look to the brand and product decisions of others and are part of a large network of friends. A person’s Stickiness rating depends on factors such as the number of cars they considered when shopping, how many fast food or casual dining restaurants they go to, and the number of different cuisines they eat. Our TRAITS measures let us use how people make decisions on the road or in the supermarket to predict how they react in the voting booth or in political conversations. Being a fan of a political party is like being a fan in sports or music: you’re consuming an identity, expressing an idea, and belonging to a team. Major party fans are easy to spot in their lives as neighbors or shoppers. They’re altruistic, enjoy information, show a sense of belonging, and are stickier than most people in their product choices. Political independents are also easy to spot. They are high on risk, so they’re willing to consider new ideas and politicians. They don’t show much loyalty in the market, and are willing to shop around for cars and cuisines. They don’t look much to the decisions of others for reassurance. They also like to gather lots of information from many sources, and tend to focus on the future when they’re making choices. When we studied changes in President Bush’s job approval rating between 2004 and 2005, we found that political fans predictably stuck with their teams. Republicans continued to rate the President much more highly than Democrats, and Independents were somewhere in between in their evaluations. Yet we also found that how people made their purchasing decisions affected the degree that they stuck with the Bush II presidency. In 2005,as news and events went considerably against the President, people who scored high on Information were more likely to express much more dissatisfaction with the President. In 2004, whether someone was focused on today or tomorrow had no impact on President Bush’s approval rating. Yet in 2005, a higher concern for the future meant lower numbers for Bush. Stickiness inclined people to stay with President Bush. To see this, we divided Republicans and Democrats by their Stickiness scores. Republicans who were stickier in the consumer market were more likely to rate Bush favorably in 2005. Democrats who tended to stick with the same products were also more likely to rate Bush favorably. Even though they were from the opposition party, these Democrats stuck with the status quo and stood by the president. President Bush and President Obama are very different politicians, and support very different policies. Yet people’s view about each president’s job performance is driven by the TRAITS they reveal as consumers. Major political fans, the people who declare a party identity, will continue to pull for their man. People who are willing to take risks, change their mind, gather information, and care about the community are political independents and more likely to have reactions in between Democrats and Republicans. A strong predictor of how your friends will react to President Obama depends on two factors, whether they’re loyal to products and whether they like information. If the news and events are favorable to President Obama in the future, then people with a high taste for Information will be more likely to rate him favorably. Regardless of which team they pull for, if your friends are generally Sticky in their decisions then they’re more likely to approve of President Obama’s performance. The people with a favorite car brand and favorite restaurant are also more likely to stick with the President they have. Scott de Marchi and James T. Hamilton are professors at Duke University and the authors of You Are What You Choose: The Habits of Mind that Really Determine How We Make Decisions .

Read the full article →

Written agreements with Ogden Bancshares, Ames Community Bank, and VisionBank

October 27, 2009

Written agreements with Ogden Bancshares, Ames Community Bank, and VisionBank

Read the full article →

Financial Armageddon in Alabama Proving Parable for Local U.S. Governments

October 19, 2009

By Ken Wells Oct. 19 (Bloomberg) — In its 190-year history, Jefferson County, Alabama , has endured a cholera epidemic, a pounding in the Civil War, gunslingers, labor riots and terrorism by the Ku Klux Klan. Now this namesake of Thomas Jefferson , anchored by Birmingham, is staring at what one local politician calls financial “Armageddon.” The spectacle — a tax struck down, about 1,000 county employees furloughed, a politician indicted over $3 billion in sewer debt that may lead to the largest municipal bankruptcy in history — has elbowed its way up the ladder of county lore. “People want to kill somebody, but they don’t know who to shoot at,” says Russell Cunningham, past president of the Birmingham Regional Chamber of Commerce. One target of their anger is Larry P. Langford , who was the county commission’s president in 2003 and 2004 and is now mayor of Birmingham. The 61-year-old Democrat goes on trial today, charged in a November 2008 federal indictment with taking cash, Rolex watches and designer clothes in exchange for helping to steer $7.1 million in fees to an Alabama investment banker as the county refinanced its sewer debt. Jefferson County’s experience is a parable for billions of dollars lost by state and local governments from Florida to California in transactions done behind closed doors. Selling debt without requiring competition made public officials vulnerable to bankers’ sales pitches, leaving taxpayers to foot the bill for borrowing gone awry. Swaps Blew Up Under Langford’s stewardship, the county bet on interest- rate swaps, agreements that a representative of New York-based JPMorgan Chase & Co. told commissioners could reduce their interest costs. Instead, the swaps — covering more than $5 billion in all — blew up during the credit crisis after ratings for the county’s bond insurers fell. JPMorgan, through spokeswoman Christine Holevas , declined to comment for this story. Thousands of public borrowers across the U.S. chose a similar strategy, and many are now paying billions of dollars to escape the contracts, said Peter Shapiro , managing director at Swap Financial Group in South Orange, New Jersey. Even Harvard University, the world’s richest academic institution with an endowment of $26 billion, fell for Wall Street’s financing in the dark: It paid $497.6 million to investment banks during the fiscal year ended June 30 because it chose to cancel $1.1 billion of interest-rate swaps. Harvard Cuts Costs The endowment fund lost more than $10 billion in value over the year, according to the school’s annual report. The Cambridge, Massachusetts-based university has frozen employee salaries, slowed hiring, cut staff and offered other workers early retirement to cut costs. Payments on Jefferson County’s debt, which switched from 95 percent fixed-rate financing to 93 percent variable-rate bonds hedged with swaps, eventually ballooned to $460 million a year, or more than twice the sewer system’s annual revenue. Three of the five current commissioners are resisting voluntary bankruptcy. A filing would vault this county of 660,000 residents over Orange County, California, which lost $1.6 billion on derivatives in 1994 and ranks as the largest municipal insolvency to date. Jefferson County’s collapse shows how people calling themselves financial engineers created borrowing schemes in the $2.8 trillion municipal-bond market that incorporated risk without the benefits of transparency. As state and local governments embraced floating-rate debt and interest-rate swaps, or agreements to exchange periodic interest payments with banks or insurers, they stopped requiring competition in bond sales. No-Bid Sales Less than 15 percent of $391 billion in new debt offerings were sold last year on the basis of public bidding — down from 83 percent of new sales in 1970. Most issues are now negotiated, meaning borrowing costs are set in private bargaining sessions. In Jefferson County, the resulting opacity was a gateway to corruption, according to documents filed in Langford’s case. The Securities & Exchange Commission began probing the county’s swaps in 2004; the Federal Bureau of Investigation started inquiring later. In June 2007, SEC investigators deposed Langford in Miami about whether he used the sewer-debt refinancings to pay off political friends. The public needs more transparency in municipal debt transactions, said Elizabeth Warren , chairwoman of the Congressional Oversight Panel for the Troubled Assets Relief Program. Proposed reforms, such as an oversight agency for consumer finance, can help spur improvements, she said. ‘Worldview Change’ “We need a worldview change about transparency and that includes municipal finance,” Warren said in an interview last week. “I believe the single biggest change a Consumer Finance Protection Agency would make is to give people financial products they understand and once that happens they’ll never go back. They’ll demand it in other areas, areas such as municipal finance.” Investigators’ interest in Langford didn’t stop him from running for mayor of Birmingham in 2007. He leveraged a pro- business message with a vow to repave streets and clean up neighborhoods into an October victory over the incumbent and eight other challengers. Thirteen months into his term, he was named in a 101-count indictment and led into federal district court in leg irons. After Langford’s departure from the commission , its financial troubles deepened. A state court last January struck down an occupational tax that accounted for 25 percent of the county’s operating revenue, setting the stage for massive service cuts. ‘Gatling Gun’ Langford, meanwhile, has been running the city with a style that Tom Scarritt , editor of the Birmingham News , once characterized as a “Gatling gun of ideas.” The mayor was gathering applause on July 21, the day his former colleagues on the commission gave notice that they might lay off up to one-third of the county’s 3,600-person workforce. The move presaged shutting satellite courthouses, putting a hospital for the poor in jeopardy and slowing to a crawl such services as auto-tag renewals. That day, Langford stepped into the cab of a bulldozer at a groundbreaking ceremony for a $550 million, 57,000-seat domed stadium, the culmination of weeks of jawboning as he guided the project’s first $8 million in appropriations through the city council. “Let me tell you something: We can do anything in this city we want to do,” said Langford, who worked as one of the region’s first black television news reporters in the 1970s before he got into politics. ‘In a Heartbeat’ Friends and foes say his political stock remains strong in Birmingham. He would “win in a heartbeat” if an election were called tomorrow, says Patricia Todd, a Democratic state legislator whose district lies partly in the city of 229,000. In Jefferson County’s bedroom communities, some are seething over Langford’s role in the sewer-bond crisis and the county’s financial woes. “He’s a pure idiot,” says David King, a pharmacist from Vestavia Hills, a town of 25,000 about six miles south of Birmingham. The mayor’s trial was moved 47 miles away to Tuscaloosa from Birmingham after his lawyer argued that negative publicity had tainted the local jury pool. In July and August, Langford’s two co-defendants pleaded guilty and agreed to testify for the prosecution. William B. Blount , a Montgomery investment banker and former chairman of the state Democratic party , and Albert W. LaPierre, a Birmingham lobbyist, admitted to taking part in a scheme to bribe Langford to get bond and interest-rate swaps business. ‘Political Witch Hunt’ Unbowed, the bespectacled, mustachioed Langford, known for tailored suits, oratorical flourishes and frequent evocations of his Christian religion, has declared his innocence, denouncing the charges against him as “a political witch hunt.” He declined to be interviewed for this story, citing a judge’s gag order. While some on his staff initially worried the legal troubles might distract the mayor, they have in fact motivated him, says Deborah Vance, his chief of staff. “Larry feels wronged — wronged,” she says. If Jefferson County declares bankruptcy, it probably won’t move the bond market much because it’s been anticipated, says Richard A. Ciccarone , director of research at McDonnell Investment Management, an Oak Brook, Illinois, firm with about $12 billion under management. Not Safe The county’s story shows what can happen when creative financing meets old-school thinking, he says. “You always hear that sewer and water-service bonds are safe,” Ciccarone said. “This is a good example of how that’s just not true.” The county revealed in July that it had defaulted on $46 million of accelerated principal. It might already be in Chapter 9, the federal bankruptcy option for cash-strapped municipalities, except that it has received agreements from JPMorgan and other banks to hold off on forcing it to make accelerated payments on more than $800 million of unwanted bonds. In August and September, amid the cuts that stemmed from the occupational-tax judgment, Jefferson County residents got a taste of what bankruptcy might look like. As the county began putting about 1,000 workers on leave without pay, one disgruntled employee allegedly e-mailed bomb threats to officials and was promptly arrested, according to the Jefferson County Sheriff’s Office . Lines Form Lines soon formed outside the courthouse as such tasks as renewing driver’s licenses slowed. A kind of legal civil war broke out when three county agencies, the sheriff’s department, an indigent-care hospital and the tax-assessor’s office, sued the county commission to stop the budget cuts on the grounds that they posed a danger to public safety. Bettye Fine Collins , the commission president, declared the situation, “our Armageddon.” The fight over the occupational tax, a 0.50 percent levy on personal income, dates to 1999 when state lawmakers repealed it. The county appealed that action and won a series of state court decisions until January when a judge ruled the repeal was legal. That left county leaders to find $75 million in cuts while they took the case to the Alabama Supreme Court, which upheld the lower court’s ruling in August. In parallel action, the state legislature reauthorized a modified version of the tax at a lower rate, 0.45 percent. Workers Reinstated Commissioners reinstated the furloughed workers this month, putting most on 32-hour work weeks. They have also sought a $25 million line of credit from Birmingham-based Regions Financial Corp. The legislature may have saved the county from uncharted territory. With the occupational tax crunch and the sewer-debt crisis, Collins said she had feared that, “In the worst-case scenario we could be drawn into bankruptcy on both sides.” In August, Bank of New York Mellon Corp. , as trustee for owners of about $3 billion in sewer warrants, filed suit in Jefferson County Circuit Court seeking an appointed receiver for the sewer system. The receiver should have authority to raise rates enough to meet the debt service, the bank said in the complaint, which is pending. A federal judge turned down a similar request in June, saying he lacked jurisdiction. The sewer system is already charging customers about 300 percent more to drain bathtubs or flush toilets than a dozen years ago. Above National Average By one county estimate, average annual bills are now about $750, compared with the national average of $331, according to a 2007 survey by the Washington, D.C.-based National Association of Clean Water Agencies , a coalition of utilities. It’s impossible to boost them enough without putting them beyond the means of many residents, County Commissioner Jim Carns says. “We’re like a guy making $50,000 a year with a $1 million mortgage.” Carns and Commissioner Bobby Humphryes , both Republicans, say they reluctantly favor bankruptcy, in part to prevent the appointment of a receiver who might seek increases. “We need a cram-down on the debt,” says Carns, adding that the county can afford to service less than half the obligations, about $1.4 billion worth. A bankruptcy court would have authority to reduce the amount owed. Democrat Shelia Smoot , along with Democrat William Bell and commission President Collins, opposes filing voluntarily. Detrimental for 50 Years “It would be detrimental to our community for the next 50 years,” she says. Orange County, after its 1994 default, was forced to take on “a crushing load of long-term debt,” according to a post- mortem published four years later by the Public Policy Institute of California, a nonprofit San Francisco-based economic research organization. The county’s borrowing costs increased, forcing it to “divert tax funds from other county agencies (e.g. transportation) so the county government could borrow money to pay bondholders and vendors,” according to the report. The poor were hurt in particular. “Their services were cut during the bankruptcy and have not been fully restored.” Langford, who rose from public housing in Birmingham’s Titusville neighborhood to its mayor’s office, is at the eye of Jefferson County’s storm. After earning a bachelor’s degree from the University of Alabama at Birmingham in 1972, he served in the Air Force. Upon returning to the city, he began his TV news career, specializing in investigative pieces, according to a biography posted on his mayoral Web site. Political Career Begins His political career began in 1977, when he won a Birmingham City Council post. In 1988, he was elected mayor of Fairfield, a suburb of 11,300 about nine miles southwest of the county seat. He studied at the Harvard University Kennedy School of Government during 2000 and in 2002 ran for the county commission. His October 2007 Birmingham mayoral victory was powered largely by his popularity among the city’s 74 percent black majority. Once elected with 50.3 percent of the vote, “he had a lot of white corporate leaders who were quickly at his side currying his support,” says Robert G. Corley, a Birmingham native and director of UAB’s Global and Community Leadership Honors Program . “And in many ways he’s delivered on key projects that they wanted.” Launching Projects The mayor immediately launched “23/23,” which guarantees cleanup crews will scour the city’s 23 neighborhoods every 23 days. He embarked on a three-year project that will spend as much as $48 million toward a goal of repaving all 1,100 miles of Birmingham’s streets. Langford also persuaded the council to appropriate $20 million for expanding Birmingham’s Children’s Hospital, and $1 million toward renovating Bethel Baptist Church , the headquarters of the Alabama Christian Movement for Human Rights during the Civil Rights era. He was instrumental in renaming Birmingham International Airport for Fred Shuttlesworth, the church’s leader during the 1960s, Vance said. Two other Langford projects are scheduled to be completed next year. A $7.5 million hall of fame is planned to honor baseball players from the Negro and Southern Association leagues during the Jim Crow period, and a $1 million Civil Rights and Heritage Trail will document scenes of local struggles. “Under my leadership, the city, with its ‘do something’ attitude is determined to be the best ‘New South’ city in the nation and one of the world’s leading centers for medical research, biotechnology, green space and world-class culture!” Langford’s Web site says. ‘Make Things Happen’ “This mayor is very eager to accomplish things, do things, make things happen,” says Michael Calvert, director of Operation New Birmingham , a business group that pushes for downtown development. His tactics can range from cajolery to confrontation. The dome, a planned stadium for which Langford has not yet announced any professional sports tenant, provides an example. First proposed more than a decade ago, the project lay dormant until he revived it as central to his administration, saying Birmingham’s current convention center isn’t big enough to draw major sporting events or mega-conventions that could boost city commerce. When approval stalled amid a budget wrangle in July, the mayor told council members he wanted them to watch a promotional video. One Small Step Down went the lights in the council’s paneled chambers and up on overhead screens came the pitch — without a word about the dome’s virtues. Instead, 90 seconds of flickering footage of the July 1969 moon landing appeared over the words: “It took less time to go to the moon than it’s taking us to build the dome.” The audience laughed, yet the council still balked at the funding. One member noted that the progress and financing report Langford presented for approval was stamped “draft” by the city attorney’s office. That was an error, the mayor’s office said after the meeting. Later that afternoon, Langford fired the city attorney responsible. Vance confirmed the dismissal. “He can be very charismatic and he can be very intimidating,” says UAB’s Corley. Langford has stayed out of the county’s occupational-tax controversy except to suggest that commissioners enact an across-the-board pay cut instead of putting large numbers of employees on unpaid leave. His advice was ignored. ‘Kind of a Joke’ “I think it’s kind of a joke that Mr. Langford says he now has all these solutions for us when he’s the one who helped us get in this problem,” says Linda Sexton, a 25-year-veteran of the county’s sewer department. Alabama is no stranger to political turmoil and corruption. In the 1990s, Guy Hunt, a Republican governor, was removed from office after being convicted on an ethics violation involving the misuse of inaugural funds. Hunt was eventually pardoned. In 2006, Richard Scrushy , founder of Birmingham-based HealthSouth Corp. , was convicted along with former Governor Don Siegelman , a Democrat, of bribery, conspiracy and fraud in an alleged quid-pro-quo scheme involving trading campaign contributions for political favors. Those convictions are being appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court. The Langford case and the county’s handling of its finances have deepened local cynicism. ‘Start Over’ “I think they need to clean the whole thing out and just start over,” says Kim Jackson, a county elementary-school teacher from the town of Hoover. Sitting on a bench in downtown Kelly Ingram Park , a scene of civil-rights struggles in the 1960s, Andrew Lewis, a part- time laborer who sometimes leads informal park tours, calls the situation “a disgrace.” The sewer financing debacle began in 1996, when the county entered into a consent decree with the federal government to upgrade sewers that were blamed for polluting the local watershed. The estimated $1.5 billion project grew into a $3.2 billion behemoth, and in 2002 — the year Langford was elected to the commission — county leaders began refinancing about $3 billion in tax-exempt bonds that had helped pay for the improvements. Interest rates were at a 30-year low. While that made fixed rates attractive, a JPMorgan banker advised commissioners to issue variable-rate debt with swaps layered on top to create a “synthetic fixed rate.” The technique was “supposed to provide a lower rate than traditional fixed rate” bonds, according to a letter Collins sent to the SEC in June. Theory of the Deal Under the deal, the county would pay JPMorgan a fixed rate in return for receiving floating-rate payments from the bank. In theory, the payments to the county would match its debt obligations, leaving its swap payments to the bank as the county’s only cost. In 2003 and 2004, with Langford as president, the commission plunged into interest-rate swaps with JPMorgan, Bear Stearns Cos., Bank of America Corp. and Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. Over time, the county, whose fiscal 2010 operating budget is $808.6 million, entered swaps on more than $5 billion in bonds. Langford said in 2005 that the swaps would save $214 million — an assumption based on the county and its bond insurers maintaining their credit ratings. ‘Bunch of Rubes’ “You know, I get the impression that people think a bunch of rubes in Alabama shouldn’t be smart enough to utilize these swaps,” he told Bloomberg News that year. The county later hired financial adviser James White of Birmingham-based Porter, White & Co., who estimated that the commission’s cost for the swaps, $120.2 million, was as much as $100 million too high, based on prevailing rates. Then, in 2007-08, credit ratings for bond insurers that backed the variable-rate bonds plummeted to junk status because of unrelated losses in mortgage-backed securities. The reduction in credit quality killed demand for the bonds they insured. Banks were forced to buy the securities, kicking in contract provisions that accelerated to four years from 40 the county’s payment schedule on more than $800 million of the debt. The insurers’ fall also affected more than $2 billion in auction-rate securities in late 2007 as bidders’ interest evaporated. Some of the county’s variable rates more than tripled, to as high as 10 percent. Meanwhile, the bank payments it received were decreasing. In March 2009, when JPMorgan canceled its swap agreements, a county filing said they were worth more than $650 million to the bank, which has agreed to waive termination fees under negotiations on how to restructure the county’s debt. Federal Investigations JPMorgan disclosed in May that the SEC is investigating the bank’s role in selling the financing structure to the county. The regulatory agency, along with the U.S. Justice Department, is also conducting a nationwide investigation into alleged bid- rigging or collusion in the sale of “municipal derivatives.” As for Langford, he “sold out his public office to his friends Blount and LaPierre for about $235,000 in clothes, watches and cash to pay his growing personal debt,” said a Department of Justice press release that accompanied the unsealing of his indictment in December. Of more than $7 million in fees Blount allegedly received, he kicked back $371,932 to LaPierre, according to federal documents in the case. In one instance, Langford demanded $69,000 “to influence and reward him in connection with Jefferson County financial transactions,” according to a July 29 plea agreement LaPierre filed in Birmingham federal district court. In June 2003, Blount wrote a $69,000 check to LaPierre who, three days later, wrote a $69,000 check to Langford, according to the agreement. Upscale Clothier Between May and November 2004, Blount and LaPierre — using checks and American Express cards — spent $12,000 on clothing and luxury goods for Langford at Remon’s Clothier , an upscale Birmingham retailer, the government alleges. LaPierre, 59, pleaded guilty July 29 to one count of conspiracy and to filing a false tax return. Blount, 55, pleaded guilty Aug. 18 to one count of conspiracy and one count of bribery and agreed to forfeit $1 million. Blount faces as many as 10 years in prison; LaPierre five years. Their sentences might be reduced, assuming “substantial assistance” to the government at Langford’s trial, according to their plea agreements. Some aren’t betting against Langford. “Well, he’s been a politician for a long time,” says Maralyn Mosley, 71, an activist in the black community. ‘I think he knows his way around the minefields.” Sackcloth and Ashes At least some of his popularity stems from Langford’s displays of faith in a city that has one church for every 346 people — more than twice the national average, according to figures provided by the Association of Religion Data Archives at Pennsylvania State University in University Park. Addressing violence in city schools, the mayor in April 2008 got the city council to proclaim a “day of prayer, sackcloth and ashes.” During an event at a packed downtown auditorium, he handed out actual sackcloths — purchased, says Vance, with private money. Framed in glass on a wall outside his office is an epistle titled, “Letter from Heaven.” It says: “Dear God, Why do you allow so much violence in our schools? Signed, a concerned student.” “Dear Student,” the letter continues. “I’m not allowed in schools. Signed, God.” God is often invoked around Birmingham’s marbled city hall — and not just by the mayor. At the council meeting that featured the moon-shot video, Mary Garrett, pastor of the Matthews Chapel A.M.E. Church in Fackler, Alabama, delivered a three-minute invocation. “We continue to ask you to correct, improve, remove and repair the problems and situations we have caused, instigated, messed up or torn down,” she prayed, “for we forgot to consult you from the beginning.” To contact the reporter on this story: Ken Wells in New York at kwells8@bloomberg.net .

Read the full article →

Dark Pool Proposals From SEC May Aim to Limit Growth as Trading Quadruples

October 15, 2009

By Michael Tsang and Whitney Kisling Oct. 15 (Bloomberg) — The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission may restrict trading by so-called dark pools after lawmakers said a lack of transparency on the private venues hurts investors. The SEC may reduce the amount of orders that the stock networks are allowed to execute before being required to display them publicly and limit what traders call indications of interest that gauge demand without committing to buy or sell, said Sang Lee , a market analyst at Aite Group LLC, a Boston- based financial-services consultant. Dark pools, trading venues operated by firms such as Goldman Sachs Group Inc., Getco LLC and Credit Suisse Group AG that don’t display orders to the public, are getting increased scrutiny because their share of U.S. equity volume more than quadrupled to 9.4 percent in three years, according to Tabb Group LLC. Senator Ted Kaufman , a Democrat from Delaware, said the platforms may give an unfair edge to some investors. “The intention is to restrict the overall growth of these markets that they view as not transparent,” said Lee, whose firm counts the nation’s biggest banks, brokerages and hedge funds among more than 100 clients. “There’s a level of fairness that’s in question.” Trading in dark pools such as Credit Suisse’s Crossfinder and Goldman Sachs’s Sigma X, the two largest, has surged from 2 percent in mid-2006, according to estimates by Tabb, a New York- based financial-services consultant. Bloomberg LP, the parent of Bloomberg News, owns Bloomberg Tradebook LLC, an electronic stock-trading system that links to dark pools. Officials for Goldman Sachs and Credit Suisse weren’t immediately available to comment. Bigger Orders Investors are turning to dark pools to execute bigger orders and avoid revealing details such as price and size that could move a stock, according to Lee. The growth is creating an uneven playing field with exchanges, which face more regulation, the World Federation of Exchanges said in a letter last month to Mario Draghi , chairman of the financial-stability board of the Basel-based Bank for International Settlements. “The more the dark pools exist without any comprehensive regulation, the more you’re going to see liquidity siphon off from exchange markets,” Chicago Board Options Exchange Chief Executive Officer and WFE Chairman William Brodsky said at a conference in Vancouver on Oct. 7. The SEC said on its Web site yesterday it will consider changing “display obligations” for dark pools at an Oct. 21 meeting in Washington. The regulator will propose amending its definition for bids and offers to address “actionable indications of interest,” as well as changes to the way the industry disseminates data. More Scrutiny “They’re basically saying this community blew up and matured faster than we regulated, and now that it’s grown to this large extreme, let’s re-evaluate,” said Robert Newhouse , chief executive officer at Ballista Securities LLC, a New York- based network that specializes in block trades for options, in a telephone interview yesterday. “It’s very hard to understand how much liquidity is truly dark.” The SEC review coincides with increasing scrutiny of high- frequency trading, where computers automatically buy and sell thousands of shares a second, as part of a broader examination of the workings of equity and options markets. The agency proposed last month a ban on flash orders, in which a market holds quotes a split-second for some traders before they are routed to the public, after Democratic Senator Charles Schumer of New York urged a review and later said the practice could undermine fairness and transparency. Lower Threshold? “The current market structure appears to be the natural consequence of regulatory structures designed to increase efficiency and thereby provide the greatest benefits to the highest-volume traders,” Kaufman wrote in a letter sent in August to SEC Chairman Mary Schapiro . SEC rules require dark pools to display buy and sell orders after matching more than 5 percent of a stock’s average daily volume in four of the previous six months. Most of the groups shut down trading in a security when it approaches the 5 percent threshold. Regulators may consider cutting the limit to as low as 1 percent, according to Jamie Selway , founder of White Cap Trading LLC, a New York-based institutional brokerage. The SEC may also examine indications of interest, or IOIs, in which brokerages send messages showing their willingness to trade shares, according to Aite’s Lee. IOIs range from broadcasts that contain the symbol of a stock and an estimated size to detailed information that can be executed immediately. Indicator of Interest An IOI doesn’t commit a trader to buy or sell, which creates the potential for abuse by firms that want to gauge demand for a stock without intending to purchase it, Lee said. Selway said the SEC may classify some IOIs as formal bids and offers, forcing brokerages to display them publicly. That would end their use in dark pools, he said. “It’s not really an option to show everyone,” said Selway. “It defeats the purpose of the dark pool.” Tabb Group’s Larry Tabb says the SEC should require dark pools to report trading data before changing regulations. “We can’t even get an accurate count of what these guys are doing,” he said. “Before we start regulating, let’s get some decent reporting. Do we even know what we’re regulating?” To contact the reporters on this story: Michael Tsang in New York at mtsang1@bloomberg.net ; Whitney Kisling in Scottsdale, Arizona at wkisling@bloomberg.net

Read the full article →

Schools And Students React To Surge Of Homelessness

October 14, 2009

As part of its Bearing Witness 2.0 project, the Huffington Post is rounding up a few of the best local stories of the day. Clarence Banks grew up homeless, sleeping on floors of motel rooms and bouncing from apartment to apartment. Now, at 20, he’s attending college, reports Scott Martindale of the Orange County Register , and was awarded a $2,000 scholarship last week by the Crystal Dreams Foundation , a nonprofit that helps underprivileged youth get to college. In an interview, Banks described how he struggled to maintain focus in high school and eventually made the difficult decision to leave his family to move in with his grandparents so that he could have the stability to focus on college: I was working part time at Smart & Final in Long Beach and helping to pay the rent for the motels we were staying at. I remember one day I came home from work, and I felt empty. I knew I was helping my mom, watching my brothers, but I wasn’t doing anything for myself. That’s why I made the decision to move back to my grandparents’ house to finish my schooling. ****** Griffin Ringle was one of the final graduates of the Good Will-Hinckley Home for Boys & Girls , a residential school for students with social and behavioral difficulties in Maine. The school ended its core residential and academic programs over the summer, reports Scott Monroe of the Morning Sentinel . After he graduated, Ringle was hoping to live at the school for a while to help him find a job, a place to live and think about college. Instead, because of state-wide budget redirecting, he got to spend two weeks in the school before they pushed him out into the world with a month’s worth of rent money. The money ran out quickly, and Ringle could not get a job despite filling out over 50 applications. He lived with a friend for a week before settling into a homeless shelter. Then, in July, Ringle was hit by a car in a hit-and-run, fracturing his ribs and splitting his shoulder. “It’s kind of depressing when you feel like your bowl is glued back together and you have the last piece back in there, and then all of sudden it shatters into dust,” he said. Ringle has since enrolled at Kennebec Valley Community College, with help from scholarships and grants, but admitted that his lack of a permanent home would make things tough: “If I don’t have a stable place to live, I won’t do well in school.” ****** In Anchorage, the number of homeless students has grown by 38 percent over the past year, reports Chrstine Kim of NBC affiliate KTUU . Half of all homeless in Anchorage are students in Kindergarten through 12th grade, and the numbers keep getting bigger. The school district has been tracking these students, offering free or discounted meals, transportation, and parenting classes to families burdened with the uncertainty of not knowing where they will be sleeping. “Most of our parents are working parents and they just fell into hard times,” said Marcus Wilson, principal of the North Star Elementary School. “Most of them say, ‘Hey, we’re just one paycheck away from being in a homeless situation,’” he continued, “and when it actually does happens, that’s just the way the world is now. Unfortunately we’re starting to see that a lot more, and it’s just your everyday working families that are falling into situations like this.” ****** Like many school districts forced to respond to the upswing of foreclosure cases and homelessness, the Beauregard Parish School Board, in Louisiana, is adding a new position to better serve its homeless students, reports Billie Ho Rassat of the Beauregard Daily News . The foreclosure crisis, which has forced many families into homelessness, has urged a number of schools to approve similar positions to identify homeless students and help them concentrate of their schoolwork. In Beauregard Parish there are 80 children officially homeless, and the administration wants to make sure they stay in the system. ****** The school board in Muscatine, Iowa, voted on Monday to unanimously approve spending $23,000 from the America Recovery and Reinvestment Act for the hiring of four tutors to work with homeless families, reports Cynthia Beaudette for the Muscatine Journal . The small-town school district has over 150 homeless students, and the new tutors will hold sessions designed to let those kids concentrate on their homework. The tutoring sessions will feature healthy snacks, child care for younger siblings, and encourages parents to attend and get involved in their children’s education. (Is it just us kids, or is there something oddly cruel about this lede? “Just because a student doesn’t have a home doesn’t mean he or she shouldn’t have homework.”) HuffPost readers: Seen a good local story? Heard about a heroic judge, neighbor, or doctor helping people stay in their homes? Tell us about it! Email jmhattem@gmail.com .

Read the full article →

Dr. Richard Jacoby Named President of the Association of Extremity Nerve Surgeons

October 14, 2009

Medical Community Organization Promotes Research, Study, and Treatment for Extremity Nerve Disease

Read the full article →

Joel Epstein: Hey, Who Doesn’t Want to Be a Millionaire?

October 9, 2009

In my last blog I took a lot of flack for citing a study showing a correlation between obesity and Coke or Pepsi consumption. At the risk of losing my last shred of credibility as someone able to critically interpret a research finding, here’s another study to chew on. And like the aged, marbled steaks at Peter Luger’s in Brooklyn or Jar in Los Angeles this is one you can really sink your teeth into. According to a recent Boston Consulting Group (BCG) report the number of millionaire households around the world fell from around 11 million in 2007 to only 9 million last year. If my math is correct, that’s an approximate 18% decline; not including the poor fellas at Goldman Sachs (which expects to pay record bonuses in 2009). The report also cited the only region of the world going the other way — Latin America, where wealth actually increased in 2008 by 3 percent. Ahhh, to be a general contractor on the Rio Olympic bid or a GM dealer in Sao Paulo… So, what’s my point? Being rich, or simply earning more than you need to live on, has its obligations. These include giving back, and not only because it may make sense tax wise. The fact is, even with the Great Recession, the world is still full of lots of folks who have more money than they know what to do with. And the thing about money is, as even those who slept through Capitalism, a Love Story can tell you, the rich really do keep getting richer. Hey, who doesn’t want to be a millionaire? Whether you made your fortune the old fashion way or inherited a bunch of dough through the lucky sperm club or when you chose to come out of the right birth canal, you still need to ask yourself what you’ve done lately for the less fortunate around you. And then you need to figure out how to give it away. Unfortunately, ahem , not all of us are lucky enough to live in Kansas City where the Greater Kansas City Community Foundation has created an enviable giving resource. The Foundation’s free searchable database of charities includes hundreds of organizations it has already professionally vetted. These detailed reviews include critical financial information from the charity’s IRS filings (990s), mission and background statements, summaries of the staffing and management team, organization governance, and other supporting documentation. As with all “investments,” notes the Foundation, donors should look for programs that adhere to two key values: transparency and accountability. Leadership is also essential. Since I have a feeling that most of us are not in Kansas anymore and since giving effectively is not as easy as it looks, I’ve put together a little primer with some easy rules to follow in making your own charitable contributions. These suggestions draw heavily on the wisdom of Los Angeles-based charitable giving professional Laura Borsecnik and the American Institute of Philanthropy (AIP), as well as on my own experience. Rule Number One (and Two), answer the question, “why do I want to give and what is the purpose of my giving?” Change your address, disconnect your phones, decide on some clear giving objectives, and stick with them. Know your charity and never forget where you came from. Research online or request written documentation with the charity’s latest annual report figures including a list of the board of directors, a mission statement, and the most recent audited financial statements with accompanying notes. Understand what you are paying to support. In most cases the charity should be spending at least 60 percent of its revenue on programming and less than 40 percent on general administration and fundraising. Don’t be pressured into giving on the spot and always follow the sage advice of Nelson Algren. Keep records of your donations, never give cash, and never give your credit card number to a telephone solicitor or website you don’t know. Get a receipt of your donation for tax purposes. For contributions under $250 a bank record, cancelled check, or letter from the charity will do, but for all tax-deductible contributions of $250 or more, the IRS requires you to get a receipt from the charity. Recognize that “Tax exempt” means the organization does not have to pay taxes. “Tax deductible” means the donor can deduct contributions to the charity on his or her federal tax return. If the charity can’t provide a letter from the IRS indicating its tax exempt status, you cannot claim your contribution as a tax deduction. Think, “What’s in a Name?” Some questionable charities use names that closely parallel respected organizations. Do your homework and don’t be lured in by depressing tales of woe. Nearly all non-church charities must file financial information annually with the IRS. If the charity is not registered move on to one that is. Beware of charities bearing gifts. Don’t feel that you have to make a contribution to keep this stuff. It’s against the law for a charity to demand payment for unordered merchandise. Remember that money spent sending you junk could have been spent providing services. Skip the quid pro quo thing. No, you don’t need to support every charity your friends are working for or being honored by. Get a backbone! Finally, be a Slumdog Millionaire. Take your time, do this right and whatever you decide; give, and get involved in some small or larger way in your community. It makes a difference and who knows, maybe if you do someone will mistake you for one of those people who made their money the old fashion way.

Read the full article →

Ryan Mack: Ryan Mack’s Open Letter to Detroit: Safer Exotic Bars = Faster Economic Recovery

October 3, 2009

I received an email with a link to a YouTube.com video that displayed a hearing being held in Detroit, Michigan in front of the City Council. Various people of the community were expressing their concerns over the vast number of strip clubs that exist in the Detroit area. The others, many of them who were strippers themselves, were expressing their concerns over the impact of tighter regulations for strip club owners. Both sides in this debate have legitimate arguments. Those who oppose tighter regulations state that this industry employs over 6,000 people in the city of Detroit. If these strict rules and regulations are put into place, many of these businesses would lose customers causing them to close. Closing clubs would cause hundreds of people employed by these businesses to lose their jobs. Many believe that with a devastated economy such as Detroit’s, they will have difficulty finding employment. With a 17% unemployment rate in Detroit, a $300 million deficit, job cuts, job flight, and increasing foreclosures…they have a valid argument. Those in favor of tighter regulations argue that there are 33 topless bars in the City of Detroit, but none in the neighboring county (Oakland County). This demonstrates a clear bias towards building this sort of establishment in one community, but not in others. The theory that these clubs are OK to have but “not in my backyard” definitely applies here. Another argument is that the women in the clubs of Detroit suffer from high rates of sexually transmitted diseases and physical/mental abuse. The clubs themselves in Detroit are in frequent violation of allowing illegal sexual activity and drug use within their establishments. These facts make it clear to many that more strict enforcement of rules and regulations are necessary. Banning the use of alcohol, banning any physical touching and setting a minimum distance of how close the dancers can be to club guests, mandatory use of opaque material to be placed on the breasts, eliminating VIP rooms, and stricter enforcement of current rules to curtail instances of illegal activities are a few of the rules that have been proposed. All of this in addition to the moral argument that was presented recently as one pastor stated to a club owner, “These are not your daughters but our daughters that you are exploiting and putting into harms way every night.” This is a battle that must be looked at from three different perspectives: 1. Safety 2. Economic Impact 3. Alternative Solutions for Motown Safety There is no doubt that these women are not working in safe conditions at many of these establishments. Unfortunately, there is more value placed on their ability to generate revenue than on their safety, which is exactly why we need new rules and regulations that are strictly enforced. Every industry, from people wearing seat belts to those operating global banks, must abide by rules and regulations that are established for the safety of all. If you don’t wear a seat belt you can injure yourself as you operate your vehicle even thought it may not be as comfortable. The lack of regulation and oversight in the banking industry has us all aware of the repercussions if we do not have the proper regulation and oversight in place. To our demise, we sided with the bank lobbyists to eliminate increased regulation and oversight, allowed banks to reap the benefits of the increased profit, and the excessive risk crippled the entire global economy. Yes, creation of and more strict enforcement of rules might curtail profits for these clubs; but this time we must chose to place safety over revenue and provide rules and enforcement for the protection and safety of the women who chose to work in this industry. Economic Impact The larger discussion to be had is the emphasis on the economic impact that the strip clubs have on a city like Detroit, where its major industry (automotive) has been decimated. With 33 strip clubs in the city, what is the opportunity cost that we are losing because a strip club is operational on every other corner? When strip clubs are the dominant business in a neighborhood the economic impacts are almost instant including the following: • Accompanying stores such as liquor stores, adult book stores, and adult video stores are built around the club. • The property values of the surrounding area decrease causing residents and business owners to move. • The immeasurable loss and missed opportunity cost of those potential new residents and business owners who decide not to move into that community because of the perceived lack of integrity within a community where the most prominent business is a strip club. Strip clubs are rarely built by themselves. If you put a club on a block where there are no other prominent businesses (the lack of areas with prominent business establishments describes most of Detroit), the strip club becomes the highlight of the community. Almost immediately you will see other businesses that cater to those who solicit strip clubs being established around the club. Before long what you see is a block of stores most of which are dedicated to servicing adult entertainment. If you don’t believe me, take a drive down 8 Mile if you are ever in my hometown. You will see my point precisely. Secondly, as the blocks begin to transform the property values automatically begin to depreciate. Imagine property values dropping further in a city that has been economically ravaged like Detroit. To test this theory build a strip club in your community in Detroit and you will see the surrounding property values create amazing new lows; or, you can simply do a survey of current property values throughout the city and you will find obvious dips in property value in those neighborhoods with strip clubs compared to surrounding neighborhoods free of strip clubs. There is a legitimate reason for residents and business owners who are living in various communities to fight so hard to stop the building of these clubs in their communities. If they are not successful in winning their fight many choose to move. Furthermore, businesses have no choice but to relocate due to the environment that is ultimately created around these clubs. Ask yourself; if you are a dentist, lawyer, doctor, accountant, veterinarian, or other small business owner…would you want to locate your practice in a community where the most prominent business is a strip club? Or would you go to Oakland County, where no such clubs exist, and you are assured that you will be able to service your clients in a more prolific, respectable environment? The answer is very simple. Small businesses are the drivers of most economic growth in every major city in the country. How can you grow and build economic stability in Detroit, when the small businesses or franchises do not feel comfortable establishing themselves by remaining in deteriorating neighborhoods? Don’t get me wrong, there are strip clubs in every other major city in the country but there is still growth. However, the difference is that these clubs were not the first on the scene, especially not the first to be established during the initial stages of a city’s economic recovery. If you can establish a base of respected businesses initially, then it is possible to establish an exotic bar, as you see many here in New York, and not compromise the integrity of the neighborhood. For those who feel that one should not be concerned with perception of others, they must be reminded that in the world of business impressions matter and I prefer not to live in fantasy land. To own a company that is in the center of a complex that seems to cater to the adult industry will ultimately impact any firm’s bottom line. If we focus on 1) the decrease in property values, 2) residents and businesses we lose as a result of the building of strip clubs, and 3) the immeasurable number of businesses and residents who choose not to move into Detroit because of the heavy presence of these clubs; we have three logical reasons that the economic impact of these clubs could further cripple the city of Detroit for many years to come. Solutions When the American Civil Rights Initiative attacked and defeated affirmative action in Michigan it was a crushing blow to the state. It was an even harder blow for Detroit because their population is 82% African-American. I remember the hundreds of hours I spent sending out emails, calling to spread the message, and campaigning to save affirmative action for the state. What made me most upset with the movement pushed by Ward Connerly was the lack of alternative solutions provided to assist the people to more effectively deal with an environment still plagued with racism and discrimination without the assistance of affirmative action. Let me provide you with a hypothetical example that demonstrates my argument: There is a family trapped in a deep hole unable to escape with nothing but what is perceived to be candy to eat. Someone comes along, looks in the hole, and is disgusted with the fact that the family is eating nothing but what looks like candy. Knowing that candy is unhealthy and causes cavities they immediately begin to pass legislation to remove all candy from the hole. The family objects but the individual continues feeling confident that he is serving the greater good. The legislation is passed, the candy is removed successfully, and the family starves because there is nothing else to eat. The instigator of the legislation believed he was just in removing the candy and probably had good intentions; however, the humane thing to have done in this situation would have been to provide the families access to other foods to eat so they would not starve. As reflected in this example and in the defeat of affirmative action, the instigators of the potentially harmful but “filled with good intentions” legislation all believed that they were acting on behalf of the greater good of society; however, they only were successful in removing a major lifeline for the community. Whether you agree or disagree, the community had become dependent upon these programs. Alternative solutions and education should have been provided with the elimination of affirmative action; also, it is inhumane to simply pass strict regulations on the exotic dancing industry without providing tangible solutions to those who could possibly lose employment. Community Involvement There are many programs in Detroit that specialize in education and training for minimal cost such as Focus Hope, Wayne County Community College District, Monroe Community College, Goodwill Industries of Greater Detroit: Job Training and Placement Services, Highland Park Job Center, Employment Relations Bureau, and the list goes on and on. I found this list with a simple awareness of my hometown and a Google search; however, it would be beneficial to have a job & continuing education expo where the community brings many of these programs into one central location four times per year for those whose employment is in jeopardy or who have lost jobs (such as those in the exotic and automotive industries). Job fairs and career expos in Detroit are not a new commodity; however, the quantity and consistency of these types of events that assist residents to find employment need to be increased during harsh economic times. The cost to the city would be minimal since the city’s resources such as community colleges, community centers, churches, and other facilities could donate space (many such as community colleges would be happy to provide the space for free because that will increase their exposure in the community which leads to higher enrollment/revenue). The local radio stations could provide free public service announcements to advertise the upcoming career fairs (I am sure that they would be more than happy to support such a cause because they are supported by advertising dollars which are tied to the financial success of the city). If a strip club does shut down, the dancers and workers can visit a website setup by the city to provide resource tools that provides information on the upcoming fairs, organizations that participate, classifieds and other resources. Employers who are actively hiring can post their open positions on the website and establish an on-site location at these expos for on-site interviews and application processing. In this age of new technology, the internet makes outreach possible for a minimal cost. Secondly, the people of the city need to step up to the plate. I personally, being from Detroit, would be willing to provide through my non-profit organization quarterly financial literacy training sessions for those who are unemployed or for anyone who would like to get a tighter grasp on their financial health in this volatile economy. This could be the prototype for all residents with a specific skill set or expertise in Detroit … we all need to become teachers. If you have a skill or trade as well as an ability to teach that skill or trade (financial literacy, entrepreneurship, construction, accounting, legal, medical and health, etc.) we will need to organize within the community to host educational workshops. The city could assist by coordinating these activities through the development of an interactive website where instructors can register their courses on the site; and those who wish to enhance their skill sets could peruse the site for their area of interest. Possible cost of this site would be minimal compared to the long term impact this would have on the community preparing residents to find work in new fields and become empowered with vital education. Why would people agree to train for free? There are a few simple answers to that question. One: During a recession one of the best ways to obtain exposure for your company is to provide free workshops. I have been doing it for years and have obtained many new clients and national exposure/recognition because of it. Two: The best way to sharpen your own knowledge base is to become a teacher. Three: In these hard times many are willing to pitch in but have no idea of where to begin…this provides an easy way for them assist the city to recover from this recession. Simply, one can organize workshops through their church, local community centers (i.e. Northwest Activity Center), create empowerment dinners for friends and family members in your home, or select businesses to host empowerment workshops (this would serve to increase business traffic to local community businesses). One of the largest homogeneous landowners in the city of Detroit is the church. With land you have power and the ability to leverage. So what is needed is for all churches, large and small to get involved in the process of using their leverage for the greater good of the community. There are many churches across the country that are in the practice of starting businesses and making investments such as the purchase of a franchise. This not only increases income earning potential, but creates jobs for the membership of the church where they can work to run the franchise. You say that you are too small to start a franchise? Well this is where you do something that is done too infrequently within our community churches…we can partner with other churches. The Lord said, “If as one people speaking the same language they have begun to do this, then nothing they plan to do will be impossible for them.” (Genesis 11:6) What would happen if churches learned how to combine forces and create economic development corporations? The largest employer in Queens, New York is Floyd Flake of Allen AME Church Cathedral and last I checked he has $30+ million Corporation with over $75 million in real estate assets. Other churches like Abyssinian Baptist Church in Harlem, Harlem Congregations of Community Improvement, and the list goes on across the country of how churches have used their leverage for the greater good of the community. We can do the same in Detroit. If done right, an economic movement of the church can create thousands of jobs for the city of Detroit. I have not forgotten about the businesses, high net worth individuals, and others who can also contribute. Right now, there is a big problem with credit and gentrification in Detroit. Banks cannot lend because they are over run with debt from thousands of properties that have been foreclosed in Detroit. Visit any Real Estate website and search for Detroit properties, you will be surprised at the amount listings for houses under $1,000. This is a huge problem for the banks as they still need to cover property taxes and maintenance fees of these homes. With the high quantity of these foreclosed homes on their books they are not able to lend funds as readily to those who are prepared to purchase property or start businesses. The high leverage within city banks is causing the city of Detroit’s economic progress to experience a pause. Unfortunately, this presents a great opportunity for the millions of dollars of investments from across the country from those who can afford to invest in inexpensive properties and bear the cost for many years. These investments are creating a large exodus from residents that have resided in these areas for generations. One can call this the beginning of gentrification of Detroit neighborhoods. Wouldn’t it be nice to not have to change the face of Detroit in order to keep its economic viability strong? This can happen and relatively easy to administer … it just requires foresight, diligence and unity. Any church (or group of churches working together) who owns substantial equity in their own property, business that generates a substantial profit, high net worth individual with a lot of liquidity, or group of residents who come together to form an investment club can participate the formation of partnerships purchase property. Having these groups get together to purchase real estate not only allows them to invest in their city and have a stake in its success, but it allows the banks to remove bad debt off their books which increases their ability to continue lending to residents of the city. Also, this will ultimately slow gentrification now that existing residents are the home owners instead of outside investors. We can take this a step further; why not create short term jobs and training to city residents by hiring them as employees to do all the necessary rehabilitation on the homes purchased? Organizations like Focus Hope or Habitat for Humanity have a large network of people who are skilled in construction who could use some work in this slowing economy. For those who are interested in entering into the field of construction, the various non-profits that provide training in this field can provide the courses for city residents at minimal cost or perhaps even for free. If there is enough private investment (aggressive community participation is also important for this to work) we could provide thousands of jobs across the city and equip residents with training that will have a long term personal impact beyond the scope of these projects. If done right and we work together we can slow gentrification, deleverage banks, increase community investment (which could lead to increased community net worth in the future), provide job training, and create employment. All of this can occur without any involvement from city council or administration assistance. In closing, there is no dollar value on the safety of the women in the exotic dancing industry and the concerns over the potential loss of employment in this industry highlights a larger need for Detroit to reestablish our ability to grow economically. These objectives can both be achieved as long we provide alternative solutions in preparation to the repercussions from increased regulation. This is possible if we begin to act as the Detroit of old. The Detroit where I grew up didn’t know how to say quit, looked out for one another, understood that none us is as strong as all of us, was proud of where you came from, and wasn’t afraid of hard work. It is time to relive those days again; we all need to be ashamed when anybody in our town feels as if they can’t make it unless they either are an exotic dancer, prostitute, or sell drugs. When did we lose our edge? When did settling for less than mediocrity become acceptable? I don’t live in Detroit currently, but my heart still does. As a native Detroiter I pledge to do my part, but we all need to play a role in this recovery…not just the Government. Bottom line: inaction is never tolerated, but aggressive action is always celebrated. Detroiters…let’s unite and return Motown to glory!

Read the full article →

Janis Bowdler: Congress Has a Responsibility to Establish Strong Consumer Financial Protection

September 30, 2009

This morning I testified before the House Financial Services Committee to support the establishment of a new Consumer Financial Protection Agency. Read the testimony here: ***** Good morning. My name is Janis Bowdler. I am the Deputy Director of the Wealth-Building Policy Project at the National Council of La Raza (NCLR). NCLR is the largest national Hispanic civil rights and advocacy organization in the United States, dedicated to improving opportunities for Hispanic Americans. I oversee our research, policy analysis, and advocacy on issues critical to building financial security in Latino communities, such as homeownership, consumer credit, auto lending, and financial counseling. During my time at NCLR, I have produced a number of publications on housing issues important to the Latino community, including American Dream to American Reality: Creating a Fair Housing System that Works for Latinos and Jeopardizing Hispanic Homeownership: Predatory Practices in the Homebuying Market. In addition, I have served as an expert witness before this committee, the U.S. Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs, and the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve. I would like to thank Chairman Frank and Ranking Member Bachus for inviting us to share our views on the creation of the Consumer Financial Protection Agency (CFPA). For more than two decades, NCLR has actively engaged in relevant public policy issues such as preserving and strengthening the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) and the Home Ownership and Equity Protection Act (HOEPA), supporting strong fair housing and fair lending laws, increasing access to financial services for low-income people, and promoting homeownership in the Latino community. For the last ten years, NCLR has been helping Latino families become homeowners by supporting local housing counseling agencies. The NCLR Homeownership Network (NHN), a network of 52 community-based counseling providers, works with more than 38,000 families annually and has produced more than 25,000 first-time homebuyers in its first decade. More recently, our focus has shifted to helping families keep their homes. NHN members have counseled more than 7,000 homeowners facing foreclosure. Our subsidiary, the Raza Development Fund (RDF), is the nation s largest Hispanic Community Development Financial Institution (CDFI). Since 1999, RDF has provided $400 million in financing to local development projects throughout the country. These relationships have increased NCLR s institutional knowledge of how Latinos interact with the mortgage market, their credit and capital needs, and the impact of government regulation of financial services markets. The economic consequences from the recession and historically high foreclosure rates are broadly and deeply felt by middle-class families nationwide, and communities of color have been hit particularly hard. Congress has a responsibility to plug the holes in a broken financial system that allowed millions of families to watch their savings and wealth evaporate and their debt skyrocket. In my testimony today, I will discuss the structural flaws in the credit market that led to millions of families being shuffled into ill-fitting credit products. Then I will offer NCLR s feedback on the proposed CFPA, followed by recommendations. A Broken System Most Americans share a fundamental goal of achieving economic sustainability and wealth that they can pass to their children. To do so, they rely on financial products such as mortgages, car loans, credit cards, insurance, and retirement accounts to facilitate their upward mobility. Unfortunately, structural flaws in our financial market have resulted in unequal access to those products key to economic success and the proliferation of deceptive practices. As a result, Hispanic families routinely pay more for credit, often accompanied by risky terms. Not surprisingly, they also bear a disproportionate share of the consequences, as demonstrated by declining income, wealth, and homeownership levels. Despite having the necessary authority and mandates, federal regulators failed to reign in the worst practices or advance policies that could have set families up for financial success. In fact, rollbacks on regulations and oversight paved the way for many troubling practices. Borrowers that were otherwise qualified for credit but considered hard-to-serve were often shut out of the market and forced to rely on inferior products. Issuers of subprime mortgage and credit frequently targeted minority communities as fertile ground for expansion, often as a replacement of prime products rather than a complement. Much of this lending was conducted by underregulated finance companies. In the years before the burst of the housing bubble, true market oversight was nearly impossible and gaming the system became widespread. Under such a regime, Latino borrowers and neighborhoods fared poorly. The lack of strong oversight, inability to identify disparate impact trends, and general inactivity to prevent deceptive practices have manifested real consequences for struggling families. Specifically, deficient oversight failed Latinos, other communities of color, and those of modest means in the following ways: Access to prime products was restricted, even when borrowers had good credit and high incomes. This most often occurred because short-term profits were prioritized over long-term gains. For instance, many Hispanic borrowers have unique profiles that creditors often consider hard-to-serve. 1 Despite the fact that sound underwriting models and products exist that can service consumers with these characteristics, there was little incentive to sell them in the marketplace. Such models earned issuers little profit, while subprime models had streamlined underwriting processes and were easy to line with high fees and inflated interest rates. The profitability of the models was also set in part by the price that Wall Street was willing to pay for risk. As their appetite for risk grew, expensive and risky subprime credit became readily available while affordable and low-risk prime credit was restricted. In this way, expensive and risky products drove out those that were most favorable to borrowers. As a result, Latino families have paid more for credit in most market segments. They are 30% more likely to receive high-cost mortgages, nearly twice as likely as White families to have credit card interest rates over 20%, and more likely to be charged costly markups on their auto loans. Disparate impact trends and practices were not properly identified, investigated, or acted upon. Despite clear evidence that minority borrowers were paying more for credit and being steered into subprime credit when they qualified for prime, the trends went unnoticed by federal regulators. Federal analysts claimed that not enough data was available to take enforcement action against specific lenders. However, the FederalReserve and other agencies did not exercise their authority to further investigate clear and obvious signs of trouble. For example, a recent study shows that even after controlling for percent minority, low credit scores, poverty, and median home value, the proportion of subprime loans originated at the metropolitan level correlates with racial segregation. In fact, a study conducted by the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) in 2000 found that high-income Blacks living in predominately Black neighborhoods were three times more likely to receive a subprime purchase loan than low-income White borrowers. Simple investigations would have turned up enough information to justify new lending rules and guidance, and possibly enforcement action. In fact, in one private meeting with a major mortgage lender, NCLR discovered that the company s wholesale portfolio consisted almost entirely of Black clients and only offered high-cost loans. The company was clearly targeting minority communities with its subprime affiliate while catering to affluent White households with its retail operation. A similar practice has also been revealed by whistleblowers in Baltimore v. Wells Fargo, who claim that deliberate strategies were employed whereby agents would target communities of color to market subprime mortgages.4 Other research has shown that payday lenders, buy here pay here auto dealers, and other fringe financial providers tend to cluster in minority and low-income communities. Shopping for credit was nearly impossible. Many experts pointed to the growing complexity of credit products and many reports demonstrated that consumers lacked the information necessary to make sound decisions. Credit card, auto, and mortgage offers are not transparent, and borrowers are often unaware of the hidden costs in their loans. Few shopping tools exist that can help borrowers create true apples-to-apples cost comparisons. As a result, many borrowers forego shopping all together. According to one survey, only 7% of Hispanic consumers who carry a credit card balance report substantial shopping for credit, compared to 12% for similar White consumers; approximately 25% of Hispanic card users that had been denied a loan did not reapply for fear of rejection.6 In the case of mortgage and auto loans, mortgage brokers and auto dealers serve as an intermediary between the borrower and the lender. While many borrowers believe these agents are shopping for the best deal on their behalf, they are under no legal or ethical responsibility to do so. While most consumers do not proactively shop for credit, credit issuers shop aggressively for borrowers. Roughly 5.2 billion credit card solicitations were sent to U.S. households in 2004.7 Through the collection of consumer financial information, issuers essentially prescreen and select their customers. Meanwhile, federal regulators sat on major reforms for years that could have improved shopping, such as a revised Good Faith Estimate and other documents made available under the Real Estate and Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA) and reforms defining unfair and deceptive marketing practices. While some would be happy to allow market forces to continue unchecked, this regulatory philosophy has had serious consequences for families and local and national economies. For example, credit card companies made over $17 billion in penalty fees in 20068 and banks will make $38.5 billion in customer overdraft fees in 2009,9 money that could otherwise be used for household expenses or savings. Subprime foreclosures are estimated to cost states and local governments $917 million in lost property tax revenue,10 while payday lenders drain nearly $5 billion per year from the earnings of working people.11 After reaching an all-time high, the homeownership rate for native-born Latinos has declined by nearly three percentage points in just three years.12 As wealth and savings have eroded, families are left with no safety net for emergencies and an uncertain financial future. Establishing Commonsense Oversight As members of this committee seek to revamp our financial regulatory system to prevent further crisis, they must fill the gaps in oversight and accountability that left Hispanic borrowers vulnerable to steering and other unfair practices. Specifically, lawmakers must ensure that borrowers have the opportunity to be matched to credit products that truly reflect their risk of nonpayment in the most affordable terms possible. This includes improving competition and transparent shopping opportunities, promoting a viable and nonpredatory subprime market, advancing new consumer decision-making tools, and increasing product innovation to serve a wide range of credit needs. Furthermore, any reform must also establish strong market accountability. Credit markets and practices are dynamic, as are the tricks bad actors use to lure borrowers into products laced with risky and expensive features. While some argue that it is the borrower s responsibility to be on the lookout for deception, it is unreasonable to expect individual families to be able to regulate the market and, in effect, detect what the Federal Reserve did not. Lessons from the market implosion suggest that simply having good products available does not guarantee that they will reach the intended population. Bad practices often kept best practices and products at bay. The ideal regulatory structure would be able to identify and eliminate deceptive practices and enforce strong consumer protection laws. The Consumer Financial Protection Agency (CFPA), proposed by the Obama administration and members of this committee, is the dominant policy proposal currently under consideration to address these issues. NCLR supports the creation of a new agency dedicated to consumer protection, product innovation, and equal access to financial markets. While some are pointing to recent actions by federal regulators as evidence that the necessary regulatory capacity exists, conflicts of interest prevent federal agencies from focusing expressly on the needs of consumers, especially those of color. Federal regulators missed key trends impacting Latinos and all consumers, acting only when it was too late to stop an implosion of the credit market. That said, the CFPA must be established with the authority, jurisdiction, and funding necessary to carry out to accomplish its mission. As laid out in the discussion draft of the Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2009, 13 the agency stands to improve market oversight in critical ways. Other aspects, however, still require strengthening. As this committee moves forward with its deliberations, we urge you to retain the following aspects of the discussion draft: Elevation of fair lending laws. As described above, many Latino consumers were steered into subprime loans, even when they had high incomes and good credit. Had federal regulators better enforced fair lending laws, many such tactics would have been eliminated. The discussion draft authorizes CFPA to assume responsibility for overseeing the financial industry s compliance with fair lending laws currently under the jurisdiction of the federal regulators. It also explicitly incorporates civil rights into the agency’s mission, as well as its structure, by establishing an Office of Fair Lending and Equal Opportunity. These additions elevate the enforcement of fair lending as a major priority within the agency. We urge lawmakers to go one step further in tasking CFPA with identifying trends and practices that have disparate impact on minority and underserved populations, and taking the steps necessary to curb such behavior. Strong supervision and consumer protection rule-writing ability. In the most recent draft, CFPA has been granted robust rule-writing authority that will allow it to consolidate enforcement of consumer protection laws and better protect financial services consumers. It also provides the agency with an independent Executive Director, which will allow the agency to stay objective in its assessments of the market. Moreover, rules issued by CFPA will not preempt stronger laws elsewhere, ensuring that no borrowers lose protection as a result of CFPA action. These provisions should not be weakened. In addition to these provisions, NCLR has also been working closely with members of the committee to lay the groundwork for greater access to financial advice. Timely advice and information is critical to improving the way consumers make decisions, promoting wealthbuilding and preventing cycles of debt. It is not enough for CFPA to develop passive and generic materials. Instead, they must actively promote the delivery of financial counseling from trained professionals to families that need it most. CFPA could be a strong vehicle for improving the way financial markets serve their Latino clients. However, more could be done to ensure that this new agency can fully accomplish its goals. NCLR strongly encourages Congress to strengthen or reinstate key provisions to guarantee that Hispanic consumers are well-served. Specifically: Improve access to simple, prime credit products. Ensuring that one can obtain the most favorable credit product and terms for which one qualifies should be a principal goal of federal efforts to reform financial oversight. Provisions that would have required financial institutions and entities to offer basic, straightforward car and home loans or credit cards have been removed. This leaves a gaping hole in protections for households that struggle to connect to the most favorable products for which they qualify. CFPA must be able to promote and advance simple, standard products in the marketplace. This includes fostering innovation in product development to meet the needs of underserved communities. Borrowers should be qualified against that product first and opt for other products as necessary based on niche needs or qualifications. Eliminate loopholes for those that broker financing and credit bureaus. Cut off or underserved by many retail outlets, borrowers of color or those with modest incomes often rely on finance brokers to help them find a loan. Financing offered by auto dealerships, mortgage brokers, or real estate agents are major sources of credit that demand greater attention and oversight. Many of the worst abuses in the auto and home loan markets were at the hands of brokers and dealers. As those closest to the transaction, dealers, brokers, and agents have an extraordinary responsibility and opportunity to ensure that credit deals are fair and fitting to the borrower s circumstances. Moreover, an exemption was also made for credit bureaus. While not direct lenders, the practices of credit bureaus directly impact the quantity and quality of credit that flows to consumers. For example, credit bureaus set rules around the manner in which credit scores are calculated. Also, by making their data available to certain vendors, creditors are able to shop for consumers, limiting the information and offers made available to all. Real estate agents, brokers, auto dealers, and credit bureaus should not escape greater accountability. Committee members should ensure that they are within the jurisdiction of CFPA. Reinstate community-level assessment in CFPA. CFPA must be able to assess product offerings at a community and regional level. Without such an assessment, favorable credit products may be developed but will remain unavailable in entire neighborhoods. Subprime lenders, creditors, and fringe financial providers often target entire neighborhoods based on the demographics of the area. Their efforts are often successful because those offering more favorable products are physically absent or do not cater to the needs of local residents. With CRA removed from the jurisdiction of CFPA, there is no mechanism for promoting access to credit and eliminating abuses at the community level. To be successful, CFPA must be able to assess the delivery of products at the community level, as well as the products and industries themselves. Including CRA in the CFPA will give the agency the authority necessary to make such an assessment. Conclusion Poor oversight and market inefficiencies have diverted untold sums of hard-earned income and savings away from households. Rather than waste money, a sound financial market should provide opportunities to achieve financial security. NCLR supports the committee s efforts to improve market oversight and accountability with this shared goal in mind. As one of the hardest-hit communities by the current recession, Latinos stand to benefit from an improved market where credit is more equitably distributed. We support the concept of a strong, independent CFPA that can serve as a consumer watchdog and level the playing field for those of modest means. We also look forward to working with the committee and other policymakers on further reforms of the financial oversight system and credit markets. *****

Read the full article →

Hilary O. Shelton: Why We Need Robust Consumer Financial Protection

September 30, 2009

This morning I testified before the House Financial Services Committee to support the creation of a robust new Consumer Financial Protection Agency. You can read my prepared testimony here. **** Thank you, Mr. Chairman, Ranking Member Bachus and members of the Committee on Financial Services for inviting me here today. I appreciate the opportunity to share with you the views of the NAACP on the creation of a Consumer Financial Protection Agency, or CFPA. I would also like to begin by thanking you, Chairman Frank, for all you have done and continue to do to help low- and middle-income Americans, as well as racial and ethnic minority Americans attain financial security. In fact, NAACP members from across the Nation who were fortunate enough to hear your presentation at our annual convention in New York earlier this year are still talking about the new agency and its promise for our communities. More than one hundred years old, the NAACP today is our Nation’s oldest, largest and most widely recognized grassroots civil rights organization. We currently have more than 2,200 units in every state in the country, as well as in Italy, Germany, Korea and Japan. The NAACP is very supportive of the creation of a strong and effective Consumer Financial Protection Agency with the protection of civil rights and a directive that it seek out and work to eliminate discrimination as a core part of its mandate. We need clear and concise rules, clearly and vigorously enforced, if we are to promote economic security and growth throughout our Nation. For too long, racial and ethnic minorities, the elderly and others have been targeted by unscrupulous lenders and underserved by traditional financial institutions. The result of this lack of standard rules and strict enforcement of the rules that we do have has been the financial stagnation, and in too many cases, the economic ruin, of entire communities. Our current system of consumer protection fails to protect Americans of all races and backgrounds from the most basic exploitation and abuses that can cost individuals and families hundreds of thousands of dollars, and even their homes. Current laws and enforcement allow a range of institutions to escape supervision because responsibilityfor consumer protection is fragmented across too many regulators. Too many finance companies are not regulated at all at the Federal level. When they have been engaged, too many regulators have spent too much time in recent years asking ‘What’s the effect on the financial firm?” without asking ‘What’s the effect on consumers?” As a result, among other problems, regulators permitted inappropriate mortgages and abusive credit card practices. And the result of these misplaced priorities, as we have seen, has been an almost complete collapse of not only our Nation’s economy, but the near ruination of the global financial system as well. In the recent crisis, many of the people who were targeted by unscrupulous lenders lost their savings, their financial security, and in too many cases their homes. Sadly, many of the worst abusers consistently targeted low-income families, racial and ethnic minorities, women and the elderly. Examples of the financial abusers targeting racial and ethnic minorities abound, and can be found throughout the mortgage arena, where predatory lenders consistently targeted African Americans and others. This was also done in credit card abuses and in payday lending, just to name a few. For example, in the American mortgage market predatory lenders have, for decades, targeted African American borrowers and other racial and ethnic minorities as well as the elderly with their nefarious products. A study by the Center for Responsible Lending demonstrated that for most types of subprime home loans, African American and Latino borrowers are more than 30% more likely to have higher fees and interest rate loans than Caucasian borrowers, even after accounting for differences in risk. In fact, United for a Fair Economy estimates that people of color are 2 to 5 times more likely to receive a predatory loan than white borrowers. Put in other terms, sub-prime mortgage originators have flooded minority communities with high-cost, unsustainable loans that were made to consumers without regard to their ability to repay or the value of the property. From 2000 to 2007, communities of color lost between $164 and $213 billion, and the numbers keep rising as the foreclosure crisis worsens. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac estimate that up to half of the borrowers who received subprime loans should have qualified for “prime-rate” conventional loans, had mortgage lenders exercised proper business sense. This is not a new trend. As far back as 2000, a study by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development clearly demonstrated that many people of color could qualify for more affordable loans than they were receiving. In 1996, a study by FannieMae and Freddie Mac reported that as many as a third of the families who receive subprime loans actually qualify for prime loans. Sadly, mortgage lenders are not the only ones who target racial and ethnic minority communities with their wealth-stripping products. In the credit card market, one report showed that 15% of African-American and 13% of Latino card users have cards with interest rates over 20%, compared to only 7% of White card users – many of whom are responding to credit card solicitations with preset terms and conditions. Our communities were also hard hit by the exploitative ploys of some credit card companies which would hike interest rates and charge excessive fees, often without any advance notice and sometimes without the knowledge of the credit cardholder. And payday lenders are notorious for setting up their shops, and charging incredibly exploitative rates, in abundance in African American communities. To paraphrase Julian Bond, the Chairman of our National Board of Directors, payday lenders are as common in African American communities as Starbucks Stores are in middle class communities that are predominantly White. It is because of these targeted abuses that the NAACP strongly supports the creation of a strong Consumer Financial Protection Agency. As envisioned, the CFPA would provide the government with the tools necessary to help consumers navigate and be treated fairly by what is often a confusing and potentially ruinous environment; it would support if not require regulators to become more protective of consumers; and it would make civil rights protections more of a key element in the regulation and oversight of financial services. It is also because of the systemic discriminatory and abusive lending practices and the resulting wealth-stripping, ruinous effects, that we feel very strongly that the newly created Consumer Financial Protection Agency must be given the mandate as well as the power to seek to prevent and remedy illegal discrimination. We were pleased to see and are supportive of the provisions in the latest draft of the CFPA legislation that creates an Office of Fair Lending and Equal Opportunity, and makes the fight against discrimination based on race or ethnic background part of the mandate of the new agency. These provisions will go a long way toward putting some teeth into the laws that are already on the books and to protecting consumers, all consumers, as they attempt to navigate our Nation’s financial services. One area that the NAACP would like to see the current CFPA proposal strengthened is that we would like to see regulation of the Community Reinvestment Act, the CRA, fall under the CFPA’s jurisdiction. We need to renew, reinvigorate, modernize and expand CRA, and I appreciate the comments of the Chairman last week when he said that he, too, is serious about updating this important law. I would suggest that perhaps in thecourse of reauthorizing CRA, this committee consider putting authority for this important law under a newly created and robust CFPA. In order to fully address the needs of local communities, many of which are represented by the NAACP, the CFPA should be able to review and enforce lending laws at that level. Mr. Chairman, members, as I have said all along, the NAACP strongly supports the creation of a robust CFPA and appreciates all the work that has gone into including civil rights protections in the draft that we are currently discussing. It is our belief that a strong CFPA will go a long way toward addressing the very real needs of enforcement and regulation in the financial services arena. However, let me make it clear that we have no illusions that this new agency will fully address all of the needs and shortcomings that continue to plague our communities, and indeed our Nation. We still need strong laws to address many of the problems that allow unscrupulous lenders to target low- and moderate-income Americans, as well as racial and ethnic minority Americans and the elderly at all levels of the economic scale. Specifically, the NAACP will continue to fight for aggressive anti-predatory lending laws, as well as curbs on abusive payday loans and real assistance for homeowners facing foreclosure. In that vein, I look forward to continuing to work with you, Mr. Chairman, as well as all of the other members of this committee to enact strong legislation to help all Americans gain the American dream of economic security. Thank you again for inviting me here today and I stand ready to take any or your questions. ****

Read the full article →

New York Terrorism Suspect Zazi Pleads Not Guilty to Bombing Conspiracy

September 29, 2009

By Patricia Hurtado Sept. 29 (Bloomberg) — Najibullah Zazi, an Afghan man who U.S. prosecutors said may have sought to explode a bomb in New York near the anniversary of the 2001 terror attacks, pleaded not guilty to a conspiracy indictment during a hearing in federal court in Brooklyn. Zazi, 24, a former airport shuttle van driver, was engaged in “a chilling and disturbing sequence of events,” Assistant U.S. Attorney Timothy Neff said in Denver federal court last week, where Zazi was arrested on a charge of lying to the FBI. The sequence “suggests the defendant was intent on making a bomb and being in New York on 9/11 for purposes of perhaps using such item,” Neff said. Transferred to New York last week, Zazi was brought to court today before U.S. District Judge Raymond Dearie for his initial hearing in the conspiracy case. Zazi faces as much as life in prison if convicted. The Federal Bureau of Investigation is seeking others in the probe, according to court papers. At today’s hearing, Assistant U.S. Attorney Jeffrey Knox said the alleged conspiracy was “international” in scope. Dearie rejected bail for Zazi and ordered him held in custody until a December court hearing. Dearie said the defendant poses a risk of flight and a danger to the community. Bomb-Making Instructions Zazi received bomb-making instructions while in Pakistan, where he attended an al-Qaeda training camp, the U.S. said in the conspiracy indictment unsealed Sept. 24. He and three other unnamed associates also purchased components for improvised explosive devices during a period from July to September, the government claimed. After Zazi drove from Denver to New York in early September, he attempted to assemble the components, prosecutors said last week. Investigators contend they have evidence Zazi stayed at a New York hotel cooking the chemical items intended for use in the bomb. Authorities in New York searched Zazi’s rental car and found he had images of nine pages of bomb-making instructions on a computer laptop. They included the making of TATP, an explosive used in the 2005 London train bombings and intended for use in the 2001 plot to blow up an airplane by “shoe bomber” Richard Reid , prosecutors said. Cell Phone The defendant was found to have a cell phone video of Grand Central Terminal in New York City, according to the New York Daily News, citing unidentified people. City subways and Metro- North trains to upstate New York and Connecticut go through the terminal, located in midtown Manhattan. Federal agents also searched a hotel room where Zazi stayed in the Denver area and found chemical residue and acetone in the vents above the stove, indicating the chemicals were heated to make them more potent and more concentrated. “His actions suggest that the defendant was in the throes of making his bomb,” Neff said. Zazi “did receive detailed bomb-making information. Evidence also indicates he and other individuals closely associated to him were seen purchasing” materials, such as hydrogen peroxide and acetone, to make the explosives, the lawyer said at the Denver hearing. Michael Dowling, a lawyer for Zazi, wasn’t immediately available for comment. U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder said last week that the investigation was continuing. ‘Imminent Threat’ “We believe any imminent threat arising from this case has been disrupted, but as always we remind the American public to be vigilant,” Holder said. Assistant Attorney General David Kris said last week that authorities had no specific information regarding the timing, location or target of any planned attack. Two other men who were arrested and charged with lying to the government as part of the terror investigation were granted bail Sept. 24 by federal judges in Denver and New York. Zazi’s father, Mohammed Wali Zazi, 53, who appeared with his son in Denver, was ordered released on bond. A criminal complaint alleged that he lied to officials who questioned him about his son’s activities. The third defendant is Ahamad Wais Afzali, 37, of New York City, who prosecutors described as an acquaintance of the Zazis and a funeral home employee, was freed on $1.5 million bond after his parents, who own an Afghan restaurant in Virginia and his wife, a New York City public school teacher, co-signed the bond. The case is U.S. v. Najibullah Zazi, 09-CR-00663, U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Brooklyn). To contact the reporter on this story: Patricia Hurtado in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York in Brooklyn at pathurtado@bloomberg.net .

Read the full article →

Jon Younger: Are You Accelerating the Development of Your Talented Future Leaders?

September 24, 2009

I was in Norway last week with Statoil Hydro, the global energy company. Our firm, The RBL Group , has been privileged to assist Jens Jenssen and his human resources team in the transformation of HR. (Readers can read more about our work with Statoil Hydro in ” HR Employees are Becoming Business Partners “). At a meeting of the HR leadership team, we talked about the company’s global growth ambitions and the importance of accelerating the development of their future leaders. Like so many companies, Statoil Hydro has many opportunities for growth — more opportunities than they have “ready” leaders to fill. We faced this challenge at National City Corporation, one of the largest U.S. banks and now part of PNC. Over a five year period, we learned that a simple rule governs a company’s ability to develop leaders quickly and effectively. RBL Group partner Dave Ulrich calls it the 70/20/10 rule. The rule holds that 70 percent of development is “on the job.” Future leaders develop from the formal and informal responsibilities of the assignment, by reporting to superiors and taking on new roles in the larger organization structure (for example, being part of a leadership team), and by being coached and mentored. They also develop from special or additional assignments, task force leadership and other temporary roles that test and prepare them for increased responsibility. Another 20 percent of development is training related. The obvious aspect of training is time working with colleagues in a leadership training program. But the broader opportunities for a more robust 20 percent are worth considering. For example, many organizations utilize action-learning projects that challenge young leaders to apply what they are learning in the classroom. At National City, each participant in a leadership program was expected to identify, develop and implement a “back home” initiative that could generate tangible financial benefit. Not all participants were successful, and a few “mailed it in,” but the overall results were significant. Not only did participants learn, but the financial benefit to the organization was literally millions of dollars of incremental profit as a result of innovation in products, services and efficiency gains. The final 10 percent of development is what we call “outside-in.” At National City, we encouraged young leaders to contribute to the community as board members for municipal and charitable organizations – from the local symphony to Big Brothers Big Sisters. Doing so gave back to the community and also provided young leaders with an opportunity to participate in a board, deal with strategic issues, and gain a hill top view of what its like to grow, change or turnaround an organization. The public affairs department of the bank provided a service of matching young executives with specific external opportunities. One of the most important “practical innovations” we established at the bank was what we called the “future leaders steering committee.” This was a very senior group, led by a Vice Chairman of the bank. It provided a marketplace to connect high potential future leaders with what we called “rocket jobs” — positions that represented a step up in accountability and visibility and provided unique developmental opportunities. The future leaders steering committee was created to reduce gridlock and parochialism. Like so many organizations, it was sometimes difficult at National City to ensure we were using all of the assignment opportunities of the bank to accelerate the growth of promising future leaders because managers were understandably tempted to hold onto their best talent. By making the future leaders steering committee the owner of top talent and rocket jobs, we were able to break this logjam. Through the 70/20/10 rule — including the future leaders steering committee, well thought through training plans and outside-in participation on boards or community organizations — we were able to provide a comprehensive developmental plan for high potential future leaders of National City. As a result, the bank became what RBL Group partners Ulrich and Norm Smallwood called a “leader-feeder” (see the book ” Leadership Brand ” by Dave and Norm, published by HBS Press). Prior to its acquisition by PNC, a high proportion of senior financial services executives across the Midwest had had their ticket punched at National City. What has your organization found helpful in accelerating the development of future leaders? Let me know. Jon Younger is a Partner of The RBL Group , a firm providing consulting and executive education in strategic HR and leadership. Jon leads the Strategic HR practice area and is also a Director of the RBL Institute. He is co-author, with Dave Ulrich and three other principals at The RBL Group, of ” HR Competencies ” (SHRM, 2007), ” HR Transformation ” (McGraw-Hill, July 2009) and many articles, and last year logged client work in 35 countries.

Read the full article →

Written agreement with Community Bankshares

September 23, 2009

Written agreement with Community Bankshares

Read the full article →

Pittsburgh Rising From Urban Decay May Offer Some Lessons for G-20 Leaders

September 22, 2009

By Michael McKee Sept. 22 (Bloomberg) — Pittsburgh’s journey from a symbol of urban decay to a high-tech and health-services center may offer some lessons to the Group of 20 finance ministers meeting there this week. So, too, may its stubborn financial problems. Pittsburgh survived the implosion of its major industry, steel, and the loss of a generation of workers. Its 7.8 percent unemployment rate, low among big U.S. cities, is almost 2 percentage points less than the national average . Its foreclosure rate is one of the lowest. Those victories are tempered by Pittsburgh’s finances remaining under effective control of the state of Pennsylvania as the city struggles with a shortfall of almost $1 billion for pension and bond obligations, a legacy of its wrenching transformation. “Pittsburgh’s message is you can come back successfully from major economic decline with the right kind of leadership and support,” said Harold Miller , president of Future Strategies LLC, a Pittsburgh-based business consulting firm. “The other lesson of Pittsburgh is don’t try to hang on too long or wait for what you lost to come back.” Pittsburgh was devastated when overseas competition , new technology and a national recession combined to all but kill the area’s steel industry in the 1980s. From 1981 through 1984, Pittsburgh lost 120,000 manufacturing jobs . “It was a lot of jobs in a short period of time, in an undiversified industry base,” said Christopher Briem , a regional economist at the University of Pittsburgh Center for Social and Urban Research . “There was nothing to pick up the slack. That created a great out-migration.” Young Workers Drained Workers in their 20s and 30s were most affected. More than 50,000 a year left during the middle of the decade, an enormous demographic shift that’s still felt. Pittsburgh is the only major metropolitan area in the U.S. where deaths exceed births each year, according to the U.S. Census Bureau . “They took with them their families, and their future families,” Briem said. “A whole generation between their 20s and 40s left. We lost not only a lot of people, but the people who were best equipped to take up new industries and skills.” The road back was a “combination of some fortuitous circumstances, some strategy, and some luck,” Miller said, and may be a model for other down-and-out older cities. Universities The University of Pittsburgh and Carnegie Mellon University provided the luck, offering critical research talent and serving as business incubators. Pitt had a major health sciences center, a legacy of the cradle-to-grave society the steel mills once offered, and Carnegie Mellon was a pioneer in the study of robotics. “Part of it was karma,” said Mike Langley , a consultant to the Allegheny Conference on Community Development , an organization of local business leaders. “The areas of the national economy that started to see growth in the 1980s and ‘90s were the areas of strength here.” In 1987, Carnegie Mellon spun off RedZone Robotics Inc. , whose machines allow cities to inspect sewer pipes for damage without digging them up. “We build things” in Pittsburgh, said the company’s 39- year-old president and chief executive officer, Eric Close . “What’s changed is in the past they built large steel slabs. Today we’re moving that toward production of highly sophisticated robotics.” Another Carnegie Mellon spinoff, ReCaptcha, was acquired by Google Inc. on Sept. 16. ReCaptcha’s technology helps prevent fraud at Web sites by presenting a distorted word or phrase that users must type to proceed. Diversity Yields Immunity “Pittsburgh is a demonstration of what can be,” said Paul O’Neill , the former chairman of Pittsburgh-based Alcoa Inc. and Treasury secretary in the George W. Bush administration, who has lived in the city since 1987. He said diversifying the economy created “an immunity to economic ebbs and flows.” A century of smokestacks had enabled earlier fortunes to be made at the confluence of the Ohio, Allegheny and Monongahela Rivers. The Carnegies, Heinzes, Mellons and other industrial barons left a legacy of fine arts, museums and libraries. Rather than let them wither, Pittsburgh raised sales taxes in 1994 to support them. The city also made neighborhood development a priority, rather than focusing on downtown construction. Its Mainstreets Pittsburgh program provides funding for building restoration and facade renewal. Housing “We have some of the most beautiful housing stock I’ve ever seen in an East Coast city, much of it well preserved, much of it rehabilitated,” said Kyra Straussman , the program’s director. “The kind of homes you can buy for half a million dollars would blow everyone away.” Pittsburgh not only preserved a large network of parks, it changed land-use laws to provide more, reclaiming many old industrial sites along the rivers. In 2007, Pittsburgh was ranked as America’s most livable city by “Places Rated Almanac.” “There are these things that will make a difference in the long haul,” said Frank Giarratani , director of the Center for Industry Studies at the University of Pittsburgh. “If you let them go, the quality of life deteriorates. They didn’t let the city deteriorate.” Pittsburgh benefited from the fierce loyalty of area residents. Rather than fold or move when the steel mills closed, many of the industry’s suppliers sought other markets or diversified into other businesses. Tube City IMS Corp. , a scrap iron dealer in nearby Glassport, expanded and exported its expertise in scrap management, recycling and processing to mills around the world. Shrunken City Officials realized that Pittsburgh would become — and remain — a smaller city. Last year’s population of 310,000 was down from 424,000 in 1980 and from a peak of 677,000 in 1950, when Pittsburgh produced half the nation’s steel. “Cities succeed if they connect to smart people, who innovate and work off each other,” said Edward Glaeser , an economics professor and expert on urban development at Harvard University in Cambridge, Massachusetts. “The best economic development policy is attracting smart people and getting out of the way.” What the city couldn’t do was meet all its bond and pension obligations as residents left. Instead of changing the system, it patched, selling its water department and tax liens. “That paid the operating bills for a few years,” Briem said. “Then they were right back in difficulty.” Shared Responsibility The city is only a small piece of the metropolis, leading to duplication of services. The seven-county metropolitan population has shrunk to 2.3 million from 2.7 million in 1960. “The financial system here is not very good and to a significant degree it’s because of the overwhelming political jurisdictions,” O’Neill said. The cities and counties of the area have squabbled over how to divide up power, much as the G- 20 has found it difficult to harmonize international regulation. In 2003, the state took oversight of Pittsburgh’s budget, requiring spending cuts and tax increases. While the city has an operating budget surplus today, it still has $1.3 billion in legacy costs, including $899 million owed to its pension fund. Pittsburgh’s pension system lost more than $100 million between January 2007 and November 2008 amid market declines, and is now only 29 percent funded, according to George Cornelius, director of the Pennsylvania Department of Community & Economic Development. The city spent nearly 20 percent of its annual revenue last year on debt service, “far higher than comparable cities,” he said. Pittsburgh’s general obligation debt is rated Baa1 by Moody’s Investors Service, its third-lowest investment grade. Standard & Poor’s rates the city one level lower at BBB. “Call it ironic” that the G-20 is meeting in Pittsburgh, Briem said. “The bottom line is we’re doing pretty well. But the city’s financial issues are real.” To contact the reporter on this story: Michael McKee in New York at mmckee@bloomberg.net .

Read the full article →

Arianna Huffington: Barack Obama Must See Michael Moore’s New Movie (and So Must You)!

September 21, 2009

Michael Moore has proven again and again that he has a remarkable feel for where the zeitgeist is heading. He’s like a zeitgeist divining rod. Roger and Me was way ahead of the curve on the collapse of the auto-industry. Fahrenheit 9/11 was way ahead of the curve on the collapse of the house of cards the Bush administration used to lead us to war in Iraq. Sicko was way ahead of the curve on the collapse of the US health care system. And now, with his new movie, Capitalism: A Love Story , he is riding the wave of the collapse of trust in our country’s financial system. The film, which opens in New York and Los Angeles on Wednesday, and all across the country on October 2nd, is a withering indictment of the current economic order, covering everything from Wall Street’s casino mentality to for-profit prisons, from Goldman Sachs’ sway in Washington to the poverty-level pay of many airline pilots, from the tidal wave of foreclosures to the tragic consequences of runaway greed. Watching the film, I felt like Michael had climbed inside my head, made a list of all the things that have been obsessing me for the last 12 months, and brought them horrifyingly to life. It’s one thing to know these things are happening; it’s another to see them happening in front of your eyes. Right from the beginning — after a funny set-up juxtaposing End of Empire Rome and Modern America — Michael goes directly to the beating heart of the economic crisis, showing a hard-working, middle class family being evicted from their home. The knot in your stomach starts to tighten — and the outrage starts to build. Watch for yourself in this exclusive clip: And so it goes throughout the film, with Moore successfully walking a cinematic tightrope, alternating between a punch-to-the-solar-plexus critique of the status quo, heart-wrenching portraits of the suffering caused by the economic crisis, and laugh-out-loud social satire. The film also turns the spotlight on some underreported gems: an internal Citibank report happily declaring America a “plutonomy,” with 1 percent of the population controlling 95 percent of the wealth; an expose of “dead peasant” insurance policies that have companies cashing in on the untimely deaths of their employees; and amazing footage of FDR, found buried in a film archive and not seen in decades, calling for a Second Bill of Rights that would guarantee all Americans a useful job, a decent home, adequate health care, and a good education. And Moore underlines the irony of Larry Summers being put in charge of fixing the crisis he helped create . A little like asking Kanye West to plan a Taylor Swift tribute. While taking no prisoners, and directing equal doses of ire at Republicans and Democrats alike, the film also features a number of heroes, including bailout watchdog Elizabeth Warren; Wayne County, Michigan Sheriff Warren Evans, who announced in February: “I cannot in clear conscience allow one more family to be put out of their home until I am satisfied they have been afforded every option they are entitled to under the law to avoid foreclosure”; and Ohio Rep. Marcy Kaptur, who took to the House floor and offered a radical solution to the foreclosure crisis: “So I say to the American people, you be squatters in your own homes. Don’t you leave.” In the film, Michael describes capitalism as evil. I disagree. I don’t think capitalism is evil. I think what we have right now is not capitalism. In capitalism as envisioned by its leading lights, including Adam Smith and Alfred Marshall, you need a moral foundation in order for free markets to work. And when a company fails, it fails. It doesn’t get bailed out using trillions of dollars of taxpayer money. What we have right now is Corporatism. It’s welfare for the rich. It’s the government picking winners and losers. It’s Wall Street having their taxpayer-funded cake and eating it too. It’s socialized losses and privatized gains. Which is why — although you can bet many will try — Capitalism: A Love Story can’t be dismissed as a left-wing tirade. Its condemnation of the status quo is too grounded in real stories and real suffering, its targets too evenly spread across the political spectrum. Indeed, Jay Leno, America’s designated Everyman, was so moved by the film he insisted that Moore appear on the second night of his new show, and told his audience that the film was “completely nonpartisan… I was stunned by it, and I think it is the most fair film” Moore has done. After a preview screening last week (at which I did a Q&A session with Michael), he came over to my home for a late night bite. Over lasagna, he told me about an incident that occurred while he was filming that exemplifies how the economic crisis cannot be looked at through a left vs right prism. It happened while he and his crew were shooting the climax of the movie, where Michael decides to mark Wall Street as a crime scene, putting up yellow police tape around some of the financial district’s towers of power. While unfurling the tape in front of a “too big to fail” bank, he became aware of a group of New York’s finest approaching him. Moore has a long history of dealing with policemen and security guards trying to shut him down, but in this case he knew he was, however temporarily, defacing private property. And his shooting schedule didn’t leave room for a detour to the local jail. So, as the lead officer came closer, Moore tried to deflect him, saying: “Just doing a little comedy here, officer. I’ll be gone in a minute, and will clean up before I go.” The officer looked at him for a moment, then leaned in: “Take all the time you need.” He nodded to the bank and said, “These guys wiped out a lot of our Police Pension Funds.” The officer turned and slowly headed back to his squad car. Moore wanted to put the moment in his film, but realized it could cost the cop his job, and decided to leave it out. “When they’ve lost the police,” he told me, “you know they’re in trouble.” There is a real sense of urgency to Capitalism: A Love Story . I asked Michael what impact he hoped the film would have. He chuckled and said that, in some way, he had made the movie for “an audience of one. President Obama. I hope he sees it and remembers who put him in the White House… and it wasn’t Goldman Sachs.” At the Q&A I did with Michael — and, indeed, wherever he goes — people who see the film are asking: What should I do to make a difference? There are obviously many things people can do. At HuffPost, we are asking everyone to bear witness by putting flesh and blood on the tragic human cost of the greed and corruption that have brought us to where we are. Tell us your story — or the stories about people you know whose home has been foreclosed, whose job has disappeared, whose kids can’t afford to go to college, whose credit card interest rate has been jacked up to 30 percent, etc, etc, etc. And tell us the positive stories too: the heroes — judges, lawyers, volunteers — who are helping people stay in their homes, the neighbors who are coming together to alleviate the pain and make their community a better place to live in. You can tell these stories in words, pictures, or videos. We’ll collect them on a special Bearing Witness 2.0 section. When people are given the facts and shown the reality of what is happening, they will almost always do the right thing. Help us keep showing that reality .

Read the full article →

Video: In-Depth Look – Universal Stops Spending in 2009

September 18, 2009

Studio Halts Development Until 2010 as Deal-Making Community Suffers (Bloomberg News)

Read the full article →

Fed Criticized for Failing to Curb Lending Flaws at Banks That Later Shut

September 12, 2009

By Steve Matthews Sept. 12 (Bloomberg) — Federal Reserve examiners failed to rein in practices that led to losses from excessive real estate lending at two banks in California and Florida that later closed, the central bank’s inspector general said. Riverside Bank of the Gulf Coast in Cape Coral, Florida, “warranted more immediate supervisory attention” by the Atlanta district bank, Fed Inspector General Elizabeth Coleman said in a report to the central bank’s board. In overseeing County Bank in Merced, California, the San Francisco Fed should have taken a “more aggressive supervisory” approach, Coleman said in another report, also dated Sept. 9. The findings follow criticism by lawmakers including Senate Banking Committee Chairman Christopher Dodd , who say the Fed failed to curtail flawed underwriting and other lending abuses that contributed to the collapse of the housing market. Another report by the Fed’s inspector general in June faulted the Atlanta Fed’s oversight of First Georgia Community Bank. Congress is reviewing a U.S. Treasury proposal to give the Fed more power by making it the supervisor for large and interconnected firms that may damage the U.S. financial system in the event of failure. The Treasury plan is part of an effort to overhaul U.S. financial regulation. “The Fed does not come out smelling like a rose,” said Gilbert Schwartz , former associate general counsel of the Fed board and now a partner at law firm Schwartz & Ballen LLP in Washington. “There are things that could have been done better.” ‘Perform Better’ Other regulatory agencies have also fallen short, he added. “The real question is if not the Fed, who would perform better? The best place is with the Fed.” Esther George , acting director of the Fed’s division of banking supervision and regulation, agreed with Coleman’s findings in a letter posted with the reports on the central bank’s web site. Atlanta Fed spokesman Pierce Nelson and San Francisco Fed spokeswoman Carol A. Eckert both cited George’s response in replying yesterday to requests for comment. The three reports are the first to examine failures of Fed- supervised banks since the credit crisis began in August 2007. Reviews are required when a loss to the FDIC’s deposit-insurance fund exceeds the greater of $25 million or 2 percent of the institution’s total assets. Eighty-nine banks have failed from the beginning of the year through Sept. 5, according to the FDIC, as the worst recession since the 1930s takes its toll on the economy. Regulators have closed banks at the fastest pace in 17 years. Grading System A total of 416 banks with combined assets of $299.8 billion failed the FDIC’s grading system for asset quality, liquidity and earnings in the second quarter, the most since June 1994, the regulator said in a report last month. The largest failures in the southeast U.S. have included Colonial BancGroup Inc. in Montgomery, Alabama, which had assets of $25 billion, and BankUnited Financial Corp. in Coral Gables, Florida, with assets of $12.8 billion. “I recognize the episode we have been through, a piece of which is bank failures, is clearly not a resounding success,” Atlanta Fed President Dennis Lockhart said in a press briefing in July. “I can step back and say I think clearly we can improve. The Federal Reserve team, I think, has done a solid job overall.” The failure of Riverside Bank may result in an estimated loss of $201.5 million, or 37.5 percent of the bank’s $536.7 million in total assets, according to the FDIC. ‘Emerging Problems’ “Emerging problems observed during a 2007 visitation provided FRB Atlanta with an opportunity for a more aggressive supervisory response, ” Coleman wrote. Stepped-up supervision could have included “conducting an asset quality target examination, requiring the bank to prepare a new capital plan or further accelerating the full-scope examination that was conducted in March 2008.” The failure of County Bank, in California, will result in an estimated loss to the FDIC of $135.8 million, or 8 percent of the bank’s $1.692 billion in assets, the FDIC said. “We believe that the magnitude and significance of County’s asset quality deterioration and credit administration deficiencies that emerged in the summer of 2007, coupled with management’s disagreement with regulators, warranted a more direct and forceful supervisory response,” Coleman wrote. The San Francisco Fed “did not follow Board procedures that required sending a brokered deposit restriction letter to County” when its capital base fell below a target level, the report added. “Consistent with the report’s recommendation, the Division will remind the districts to provide timely written notification of brokered deposit restrictions to financial institutions deemed less than well capitalized,” George said in the letter. To contact the reporter on this story: Steve Matthews in Atlanta at smatthews@bloomberg.net

Read the full article →

Lawyer Fees Cut as Company Counsel Use Social Networks to Swap Secret Tips

September 9, 2009

By Cynthia Cotts Sept. 9 (Bloomberg) — Steven Weinberger, general counsel of Wisdom Natural Brands , boasted on an online social network last month that he saves money by drafting his own trademark applications before sending to outside lawyers for review. Paul Escobar, the top lawyer at Cumberland Gulf Group of Companies , wrote back saying he, too, sometimes drafts legal documents to establish content and tone before outside counsel get their hands on them. Cash-strapped in-house attorneys are swapping such ideas and other information on Web sites like those owned by LinkedIn Corp., which connects professionals around the world. Corporate lawyers’ use of social networks — some invitation-only — grew about 50 percent in 2009, LexisNexis said after surveying 1,474 attorneys. “Many lawyers believe that social networks are no more than the playthings of their teenage offspring,” Richard Susskind , the author of numerous books on legal technology, said in an interview. “I disagree. The business-oriented versions will fundamentally change the way law firms are chosen and the way lawyers work with their clients.” Weinberger’s Gilbert, Arizona-based company makes sweeteners. Escobar’s, based in Framingham, Massachusetts, is a convenience-store chain in the Northeast U.S. The men met on Martindale-Hubbell Connected , operated by LexisNexis , the legal- research provider that is a unit of the London-based publisher Reed Elsevier Plc . Martindale-Hubbell Connected has 15,000 members and is the biggest online network built for legal professionals, according to LexisNexis. Most Popular The most popular social-networking Web site overall is operated by Facebook Inc., based in Palo Alto, California, with 250 million users. General counsel, under pressure to cut costs, are networking mainly to exchange information with peers, according to LexisNexis. The survey of 764 private-practice, or outside, lawyers and 710 corporate counsel was done in May and June. The top three industries represented were financial services, manufacturing and health care. “Online networks are a fantastic tool for identifying expertise in the fields in which general counsel are looking to rein in outside counsel,” Eugene Weitz, an in-house attorney at Paris-based Alcatel Lucent , said in an interview. “Experts bubble up who have the ability to show their knowledge online.” Martindale-Hubbell Connected, launched in March, connects users to LinkedIn and provides access to 1 million lawyers in the Martindale.com global directory, said Laxmi Wordham, a LexisNexis vice president. Law Firms Law-firm attorneys are joining the sites, too, to drum up business from companies. The Martindale-Hubbell service’s members include lawyers from 92 of the 100 highest-grossing U.S. law firms and in-house attorneys at about half of the 500 largest companies by revenue. Membership is free for general counsel, Wordham said. Law firms pay for subscriptions. Online networks help companies cut costs and improve the quality of their legal work, said Paul Lippe , who started the online site Legal OnRamp in 2007 in collaboration with San Jose, Calif.-based Cisco Systems Inc., the largest networking- equipment maker. Legal OnRamp’s 10,000 members, Lippe said, include Latham & Watkins LLP ; Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP ; the Los Angeles Angels baseball team; and Royal Bank of Canada . Basic membership is free and by invitation only, according to Lippe, who calls his community “very elite” and doesn’t use the term “social network.” How Nets Work About 10 percent of the survey respondents belong to a legal online network, LexisNexis said. The networks invite members to create profiles, exchange messages, join group discussions, read blogs and post content. “Connected is a good place to share street wisdom,” James Wong, U.S. counsel for Chinney Capital Inc., part of a Hong Kong-based private-equity fund, said in an interview. Escobar said he uses Connected to bounce ideas off other attorneys. Weinberger said he might use Connected to find attorneys if a matter arose in a jurisdiction where his current lawyers don’t work. Some Legal OnRamp groups are by invitation only, giving in- house counsel a private space to solve problems collectively, Lippe said. Typical discussion subjects include alternative fee structures and how much a particular job should cost. “It’s the kind of conversation that board members from different companies have about best practices when they meet at a common board meeting,” Lippe said. Online Cliques Which network a lawyer uses is matter of taste. “OnRamp has cliques,” Wong said. “Connected is friendlier.” For outside lawyers, the networks help increase visibility among peers, according to LexisNexis. And with Connected, Legal OnRamp and others all developing systems by which company lawyers will be able to share evaluations of individual lawyers, it behooves outside counsel to participate in the online dialogue. “Increasingly the key piece of information a general counsel uses to assess an outside lawyer’s reputation is not the renown of his or her firm, but the review by a trusted peer,” Lippe said, adding that the trend is more accelerated in Silicon Valley than on Wall Street. About 26 percent of outside lawyers believe that online networks will change the business and practice of law in the next five years, according to LexisNexis. Some expressed concerns about data security and sharing personal information, while others questioned whether online legal networking will be widely adopted. “This is a universe that has yet to be fully tapped,” Escobar said. “My attitude is you’ve got to embrace it, and if you don’t, you’ll fall behind.” To contact the reporter on this story: Cynthia Cotts in New York at ccotts@bloomberg.net .

Read the full article →

Zimbabwe Sanctions Must Be Lifted, Mugabe’s Southern African Allies Say

September 8, 2009

By Franz Wild Sept. 9 (Bloomberg) — Zimbabwe’s President Robert Mugabe received support from his allies in Southern Africa as leaders called for the removal of international sanctions, saying the political climate in the country has improved. The 15-member Southern African Development Community noted progress made in implementing a power-sharing agreement between President Robert Mugabe and Prime Minister Morgan Tsvangirai and called on the international community “to remove all forms of sanctions against Zimbabwe,” according to a statement issued late yesterday at the end of a two-day summit in Democratic Republic of Congo’s capital, Kinshasa. The presidents from Mozambique, Swaziland and Zambia, who handle political, defense and security issues for the SADC, will mediate when problems arise in implementing the Zimbabwe political accord that Mugabe and Tsvangirai signed a year ago, Congolese President Joseph Kabila told reporters at the end of the meeting. Mugabe and Tsvangirai formed a government in February that is trying to reverse a decade of economic collapse and rampant inflation. Mugabe, who has ruled Zimbabwe since 1980, seized white-owned commercial farms and redistributed them to black farmers, a move that slashed export earnings, resulting in shortages of food, fuel and foreign exchange. Accusations of human rights abuses and vote rigging have led the European Union and U.S. to impose sanctions, including a travel ban, on the Mugabe leadership. Mugabe blames the sanctions for Zimbabwe’s economic disaster and has asked Tsvangirai to call for their removal. Political Changes In the lead-up to the meeting, Tsvangirai said Mugabe was stalling on political changes, including the appointments of the attorney general. “The legitimacy, credibility and indeed the existence of the inclusive government itself depends upon the expeditious resolution and enforcement of the agreement in full,” Tsvangirai told reporters in Kinshasa yesterday. Tsvangirai, the leader of the Movement for Democratic Change , declined to repeat calls for SADC leaders to put pressure on 85-year-old Mugabe to implement political changes. Asked whether he was satisfied with the amount of pressure regional peers were putting on Mugabe, he replied “this has nothing to do with President Mugabe.” Tsvangirai last week denounced what he called “vicious propaganda” emanating from Zimbabwe’s state media, saying it threatened the work of the government. While peace and stability have begun to take root in the country, MDC lawmakers continue to be persecuted and prosecuted and moves to improve human rights are progressing at a “deliberately slow pace,” he said in a statement marking the first anniversary of the power-sharing accord. SADC Tribunal Tsvangirai denied Zimbabwe has pulled out of the SADC Tribunal that ruled in November in favor of a group of white commercial farmers who tried to block an attempt by the government to forcibly acquire their land. Zimbabwe’s state-owned Herald newspaper reported the withdrawal on Sept. 2, citing Justice and Legal Affairs Minister Patrick Chinamasa , a senior official in Mugabe’s Zimbabwe African National Union-Patriotic Front. “I don’t recall at any cabinet meeting, any decision to pull out of the SADC Tribunal, or to go against the decisions of the tribunal,” Tsvangirai said in Kinshasa. The Windhoek, Namibia-based Tribunal has no jurisdiction over Zimbabwe as the protocol establishing it hasn’t been ratified by two-thirds of SADC members and Zimbabwe wouldn’t recognize its rulings, Chinamasa said. SADC justice ministers will report on a resolution of this issue “as soon as possible” after not having had enough time during the summit, Kabila said. To contact the reporter on this story: Franz Wild in Kinshasa at fwild@bloomberg.net

Read the full article →

Leo W. Gerard: Too High a Price for High Octane

September 6, 2009

No more than a thimbleful of hydrofluoric acid killed 37-year-old Alcoa technician John L. Dorton in fewer than seven hours from the moment he inhaled the mist at the plant where he worked in Port Comfort, Texas. It’s that deadly. Its transportation to factories and its use there imperils workers and nearby residents. Environmental, safety and advocacy groups for years have demanded that manufacturers substitute safer chemicals or processes whenever possible. As far back as 2003, U.S. Public Interest Research Group (PIRG) issued a report called “Needless Risk,” detailing how oil refineries using hydrofluoric acid unjustifiably jeopardize workers and surrounding communities, especially in a time of potential terrorist attacks. Only about 50 of the nation’s 148 petroleum refineries boost octane with hydrofluoric acid. The others use sulfuric acid or a different process. Sulfuric acid is hazardous as well, but a tanker spill is more easily cleaned and doesn’t form a potentially lethal, hovering cloud that defies dispersal. In addition, exposure to sulfuric acid manifests instantly as a burn on the skin. So does hydrofluoric acid in high concentrations. But hydrofluoric acid is insidious. A dilute hydrofluoric acid doesn’t immediately burn. Blistering may be delayed by 8 to 24 hours. In the meantime, hydrofluoric acid penetrates the skin, destroying soft tissue and decalcifying bone. If inhaled, it devastates lung and esophagus tissue. After any exposure, chemical maker DuPont recommends treatment occur “within seconds.” In just the past five months, accidents at three refineries involving releases of hydrofluoric acid injured 13 workers, two of them critically. One is a 34-year-old member of my union, a husband and father of two. He’s in a San Antonio hospital clinging to life after 10 surgeries and an amputation. Refinery workers and their communities pay too high a price for high octane fuel created with hydrofluoric acid. The United Steelworkers (USW) union joins groups like PIRG, Clean Water Action and Center for American Progress in demanding that refineries using hydrofluoric acid switch to sulfuric acid or another safer method to enhance octane. Clean Water Action of Pennsylvania repeated its call for conversion to safer technologies in March after two spills occurred in one month in Eastern Pennsylvania, one forcing evacuation of 5,000 residents. Myron Arnowitt, Pennsylvania Director for Clean Water Action, said then, “It just goes to show that we need to get away from this dangerous chemical before the refinery itself or one of its trucks has an accident inside the City of Philadelphia.” “We’re getting closer to a real disaster,” he said. Here’s what prompted that statement: First, on March 11 at the Sunoco refinery in South Philadelphia, release of hydrofluoric acid sent 10 workers to two hospitals for exposure to vapors. Then, just 11 days later on March 22, a truck carrying 33,000 pounds of hydrofluoric acid to a refinery overturned in a town north of Philadelphia called Wind Gap, causing a small spill. Because the acid is so dangerous, police and fire officials evacuated 5,000 residents for nine hours. Two more episodes followed in quick succession: On July 19, a fire and massive release of hydrofluoric acid at the CITGO Petroleum Corp. refinery in Corpus Christi, Texas, critically injured the 34-year-old USW member. CITGO estimated that 4,000 pounds of hydrofluoric acid escaped. Less than a month later, on Aug. 6, hydrofluoric acid escaped again, injuring two workers, critically wounding one , at the ExxonMobil refinery in Joliet, Ill. A year earlier, in yet another incident, a hydrofluoric acid leak at the Holly refinery in West Bountiful, Utah, injured a worker and forced the evacuation of another 600 on Aug. 15, 2008. And a year before that, in Sarnia, Ontario, just over the border not far from Detroit, a Suncor refinery accident sent oil and hydrofluoric acid into an open trench, where construction workers stood 200 feet away. Twenty-three suffered breathing problems and nausea and were treated at a hospital. In any of these cases, this lethal chemical could easily have killed workers or members of the community. In recent years, the refinery industry has installed safety devices, including water curtain and cannon systems, rapid acid dump systems and a vapor suppression additive to mitigate the possibility of a Bhopal cloud. But John L. Dorton died for lack of a couple of trivial pieces of equipment, any of which may have saved his life. A U.S. Department of Labor investigation determined that Alcoa required maintenance workers to wear hydrofluoric acid cartridge respirators and face shields. And the Labor Department established that Alcoa provided maintenance workers with special tools to prevent discharge of hydrofluoric acid during the stem valve cleaning procedure Dorton was conducting when he got sprayed. But, the investigation concluded, Alcoa didn’t do the same for technicians like Dorton. It failed to give them the tool or instructions to use the respirator and face shield. Because corporations cannot be trusted, because they continually make such errors, hydrofluoric acid must be eliminated whenever possible. Safety consultant Paul Orum put it this way: “Adopting safer chemicals is the only certain way to protect American communities from a toxic gas release.” He was hired by the Center for American Progress, a nonpartisan research and educational institute, to prepare a report issued last fall, called “Chemical Security 101, What You Don’t Have Can’t Leak, or Be Blown Up by Terrorists.” It lists the 101 most dangerous chemical facilities in the U.S., including eight petroleum refineries using hydrofluoric acid. Among those is the Sunoco refinery in Philadelphia that released hydrofluoric acid in March. It’s listed partly because the surrounding population is 4.4 million. Others include PDV Midwest Refining (CITGO) in Lemont, Ill., with a nearby population of 3.1 million; Marathon Petroleum in St. Paul Park, Minn., with 2.2 million adjacent residents, and Chalmette Refining (ExxonMobil) in Chalmette, La., with 1 million neighbors. When confronted with demands to convert to safer octane boosting methods, the likes of ExxonMobil and CITGO – both of which had spills this year – cry that they can’t afford it. Excuse my French, but: Baloney. As Chemical Security 101 points out, switching to a safer process enables a facility to stop complying with costly, federally-mandated security measures to prevent terrorism. In addition, the manufacturer’s insurance premiums for liabilities for deaths, injuries, contamination and property damage in the event of a major toxic gas release would decline. Really, though, for ExxonMobil to cry poor is galling. This is the corporation that reported the largest annual profit in U.S. history for 2008 — $45.22 billion. This is Labor Day 2009, a time of tribute to the contributions of workers. The refineries in this country still using unnecessarily hazardous hydrofluoric acid must ensure their workers and the residents of their neighborhoods live to see Labor Day 2010 by making the conversion now.

Read the full article →

Howard A. Kahn: The Public Option: The Third Way, Not the Third Rail

September 6, 2009

It’s in. It’s out. Is it in again or is it out again? The public option in health care reform or the “government health program,” depending on your perspective, is the “Wack-A-Mole” of health care reform. In today’s national health care reform debate, we seem stuck on an “all or nothing” approach to the public option which I would argue is not the right approach. Let’s consider another incarnation of the public option, one that meets the original goal of healthy competition. The premise of a public option competing with commercial for-profit plans is a good one. A public option, with drivers other than profit, can raise the bar for quality and overall performance in competition with private plans. It can be done on a level playing field. It can be done without forcing commercial health plans out of business. And, it can be accomplished in a cost-effective manner. How can I be so sure? In Los Angeles, we have been doing it for more than a decade (and sister organizations in 8 other counties). L.A. Care Health Plan is the largest public health plan in America with nearly 800,000 Medicaid, Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) and Medicare enrollees. We are a public entity governed by a stakeholder board, which includes representatives from safety net hospitals, community clinics, physicians and enrollees. While fiscal responsibility is at the core of L.A. Care, profit is not. Since we have stakeholders and not shareholders, we concentrate on improving quality, driving innovation, supporting the safety net, and expanding coverage. In 2008, LA Care achieved certification by the National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA). We’ve developed innovative ways to align financial incentives across the system to drive quality improvement and address disparities, resulting in more timely prenatal care and adolescent well care delivery. We have also made investments in safety-net providers that not only benefit our enrollees but others in our community who rely on the safety net. Examples include our investment of $1.5 million in accessible exam room equipment to better prepare safety net clinics to serve an aging population, and $7 million in oral health to fill in a gap in dental care. We’ve also been innovative in our use in aligning financial incentives among providers, and members to improve quality and address disparities, such as improving timely prenatal care and adolescent well care. We’ve even expanded health coverage to over 70,000 low-income children who do not quality for Medicaid or CHIP. All of this has been accomplished in the state with one of the lowest reimbursement rates of any Medicaid program in the nation. Let’s see here, an existing public plan model has a track record of expanding coverage, supporting safety net providers, realigning financial incentives, increasing quality, responding to consumer need and doing it all while containing costs. Isn’t that what we are all looking for in health care reform? The adage is if you know one health care market, you know one health care market. Provider organizations vary regionally in their infrastructure, contracting capacity, and ability to coordinate and manage patient care. Regions also vary tremendously in the availability of and access to specialty and tertiary care, evidenced by the wide swings in regional health disparities. That’s why the public plan option must be nimble enough to respond to local market conditions. It is important that policymakers broaden their search to include local public plans like L.A. Care, as well as cooperatives and not-for-profit safety net health plans that are already serving low-income populations through government-sponsored programs. With about 64% of Medicaid market share in Los Angeles, we’ve proven that a public plan can compete with a private plan. L.A. Care has invested over $80 million into supporting community clinics and providing coverage to tens of thousands of kids who otherwise would be uninsured. The plan must be nimble enough to respond to local markets and not force private insurers out of the mix. This can be accomplished by offering states incentives to create regional plans that are either public, not-for-profit, or cooperatives, and meet criteria to ensure they are accountable, transparent, compete on a level playing field, and serve the public’s interest. It shouldn’t be monolithic, national and have the ability to rate-fix. Because it wouldn’t be health care reform without a new acronym, let’s call these entities “State-Designated Regional Health Consortiums” or SDRHCs. These localized SDRHCs can be an option offered to individuals and businesses through the exchange, and can also serve public programs outside of the exchange. States should not be mandated to form SDRHCs, but should have a strong financial incentive to develop one. One idea would be for the federal government to offer an enhanced Federal Medical Assistance Percentage (FMAP) rate for a minimum of four years to states that create and/or utilize SDRHCs within the first year of reform. SDRHCs should be required to have local stakeholder governance, which will ensure that the plan will reflect the needs and priorities of the region it serves. These organizations can be structured as public or quasi-public, private not-for-profits (under certain conditions), and cooperatives. The governing body should include representatives from consumers, government, safety net providers, physicians, hospitals, and other providers. SDRHCs will operate under a set of open-meeting and conflict of interest rules that ensure transparency and oversight. These organizations will be financially self-sustaining, as the funds used to operate the plan shall be derived from enrollee premiums. While SDRHC’s will receive some federal and state start up funding, it will be in the form of grants or loans. SDRHCs will have the same licensing, oversight, actuarial rate setting methodology, and financial reserve requirements as private plans. SDRHCs would be held to the same set of requirements for access and quality of care as private plans. However, because SDRHCs drivers are different than private plans, SDRHCs should be required to reinvest margins in the communities they serve. They should support the safety net, administer community grantmaking programs, or provide a return to the purchasers/consumers, thus improving the health of the local community. SDRHCs should be required to offer contracts to all qualified safety-net providers under the same terms and conditions that the plan requires from other providers. Safety net providers include Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs), community health centers, rural and Indian health services centers, disproportionate share hospitals, public and university hospitals, and rural and children’s hospitals. The reasoning behind this requirement is that even with universal health coverage, there will still be a need for the safety net. Safety net providers will continue to be the main source of care for those who remain uninsured or are socially or behaviorally complex to effectively treat in private systems. These providers will also continue to see a significant number of those who have coverage through government-sponsored programs. There are many successful models of these types of plans in different parts of the country, and particularly here in California. Let’s not just give up on the public plan option – let’s figure out a way to make it work by keeping the aspects of it that bolster the strengths of our existing markets and not those that threaten it.

Read the full article →

Florida’s Economic Bust Propels Muni Bond Default Spike: Chart of the Day

September 1, 2009

By Joe Mysak Sept. 1 (Bloomberg) — No other state comes close to Florida in defaulted municipal bonds. The CHART OF THE DAY shows the number of bond issues that have gone into default over the past decade and Florida’s contribution to the total, according to the Distressed Debt Securities newsletter of Miami Lakes, Florida. Of the 126 bonds that are in default in 2009, 70 were sold in Florida. Blame it on the collapse of the real estate market in general and, in particular, on Community Development Districts, which sell bonds to pay for infrastructure to support new real estate developments. Florida has 600 such districts, and 105 have gone into default on a total of $3.2 billion in bonds. Asked how the so-called dirt district defaults in Florida compared with similar meltdowns in Colorado in the 1980s, Texas in the late 1980s and early 1990s and California in the 1990s, Richard Lehmann , publisher of the newsletter, said, “It’s worse than all three combined.” He also observed that some California defaults are still being worked out a decade after they occurred. Lehmann has launched a Web site devoted to this, http:// www.floridacddreport.com . “The death of Florida real estate has been reported and greatly exaggerated,” said Terry O’Grady , senior vice president of municipal trading at FMSBonds Inc. in North Miami Beach, which makes a market in Florida CDD bonds. “If you have time to do the research properly, and can figure out which districts are going to be built out, this is a good buying opportunity.” After Florida, Ohio is second-largest with eight defaults and Illinois is third with five. The record year for municipal defaults was 2008, when 151 municipalities violated covenants on $7.9 billion in bonds. To contact the reporter on this story: Joe Mysak in New York at jmysakjr@bloomberg.net .

Read the full article →

Florida’s Economic Bust Propels Muni Bond Default Spike: Chart of the Day

September 1, 2009

By Joe Mysak Sept. 1 (Bloomberg) — No other state comes close to Florida in defaulted municipal bonds. The CHART OF THE DAY shows the number of bond issues that have gone into default over the past decade and Florida’s contribution to the total, according to the Distressed Debt Securities newsletter of Miami Lakes, Florida. Of the 126 bonds that are in default in 2009, 70 were sold in Florida. Blame it on the collapse of the real estate market in general and, in particular, on Community Development Districts, which sell bonds to pay for infrastructure to support new real estate developments. Florida has 600 such districts, and 105 have gone into default on a total of $3.2 billion in bonds. Asked how the so-called dirt district defaults in Florida compared with similar meltdowns in Colorado in the 1980s, Texas in the late 1980s and early 1990s and California in the 1990s, Richard Lehmann , publisher of the newsletter, said, “It’s worse than all three combined.” He also observed that some California defaults are still being worked out a decade after they occurred. Lehmann has launched a Web site devoted to this, http:// www.floridacddreport.com . “The death of Florida real estate has been reported and greatly exaggerated,” said Terry O’Grady , senior vice president of municipal trading at FMSBonds Inc. in North Miami Beach, which makes a market in Florida CDD bonds. “If you have time to do the research properly, and can figure out which districts are going to be built out, this is a good buying opportunity.” After Florida, Ohio is second-largest with eight defaults and Illinois is third with five. The record year for municipal defaults was 2008, when 151 municipalities violated covenants on $7.9 billion in bonds. To contact the reporter on this story: Joe Mysak in New York at jmysakjr@bloomberg.net .

Read the full article →

Working-Class Boston Neighborhood Turns Out for Favorite Son’s Last Hurrah

August 29, 2009

By Tom Moroney and Karen Leigh Aug. 30 (Bloomberg) — Well-wishers plastered old campaign banners and American flags on graffiti-smudged brick walls. They peered from apartment windows and stood in the rain in front of tiny shops in Boston’s Mission Hill section yesterday as scores of dignitaries arrived for the funeral of Senator Ted Kennedy . The Basilica of Our Lady of Perpetual Help , a towering stone church on Tremont Street, was chosen because Kennedy had prayed for help there when his daughter, Kara, was sick with lung cancer in 2002. Pulitzer-winning historian Doris Kearns Goodwin , waiting in the rain to get into the funeral Mass, saw another reason for picking what is simply called Mission Church. “See all the people in the windows there,” Goodwin said, pointing to those looking out from three-story working-class apartments across the street as dignitaries’ limousines pulled up at the church. “It really shows the roots of this Kennedy family .” “It’s just extraordinary,” she said. Both Kennedy’s grandfathers were prominent Boston politicians, drawing their power from a similar working-class base. On his mother’s side, John “Honey Fitz” Fitzgerald was elected the first Irish-American mayor of the city in the early 1900s. On his father’s side, P.J. Kennedy was a saloon owner and ward boss. The 1914 marriage of their children, Kennedy’s parents, Rose and Joseph, was seen as a merger of the two powerful families. Racially Mixed Mission Hill has a total of 18,000 blacks, whites, Hispanics and Asians with 36 percent of residents living below the poverty line, according to census data. Near the church on Tremont Street are an auto parts shop, laundromat and doctors’ offices. A deli outside the security zone swarmed with those seeking a glimpse the politicians and business chiefs showing up for the funeral of Kennedy, who died Aug. 25 at age 77 of brain cancer. William Bulger , the former president of the Massachusetts Senate who was raised in Boston’s Southie neighborhood, told of the first time he met Kennedy in 1962. Kennedy aides had invited him to Locke-Ober restaurant hoping to enlist him in Kennedy’s first Senate campaign. Lobster Dish Bulger said he ordered an expensive lobster dish and was so busy eating he never looked up until someone suggested he acknowledge his host. Kennedy quipped, “Don’t worry about him. We couldn’t afford to feed him anyway,” Bulger recalled. Christine Schwarzman , wife of Blackstone Group Chief Executive Officer Stephen Schwarzman , said, “It was a privilege to have known Ted and to know Vicki,” the late senator’s wife who spent hours greeting mourners when her husband’s body lay in repose at the John F. Kennedy Presidential Library & Museum. Boston Celtics Hall-of-Fame center Bill Russell was there, as was Boston Red Sox owner John Henry and cellist Yo-Yo Ma , who performed at the Mass. Across from the church as guests continued to move through the security check, staff at youth center Sociedad Latina had painted its windows in tribute to Kennedy. “The hope still lives and the dream shall never die,” read part of one message, borrowing from Kennedy’s 1980 speech at the Democratic National Convention after losing the primary race to President Jimmy Carter . Slept at Office Executive director Alexandra Oliver said she and some of the staff slept in the office overnight because they were told they wouldn’t be able to gain entrance in the morning. “Kennedy loved this community,” she said. Caprice Taylor Mendez, 36, originally from Guatemala , said she was inspired by Kennedy to become a citizen in 1998. “We need more people with that spirit who believe in human rights,” she said. “It’s really messed up,” said pizza-shop worker Antonio Gomez, 30, of Kennedy’s death. “He did good for the people.” At security blockades where waves of multicolored umbrellas could be seen, dozens stood in the rain. “I don’t really care if I get wet,” said Brian Ebel, 32, of Millis, Massachusetts , 18 miles west of Boston. “I definitely was a fan. I grew up here and he’s just always been a part of my life.” Best View Among those with the best view were apartment dwellers directly across from the church, some of them students attending local colleges. Sipping from a coffee mug inside a first-floor window, Ryan Dunleavy, 23, a recent college graduate, said he knew about the Kennedy family from a young age. “My grandmother was the first woman selectman in my hometown and so we’d hear about them all the time,” he said. “She was like the Rose Kennedy where I come from.” His boyhood friend, Ryan Berube, 22, a Northeastern University finance student, sat next to him. “You hear all about the Kennedy curse, that he was the only brother to live out his natural life, and then you hear about all the things he’s done for civil rights and other issues,” Berube said. “It’s incredible really,” he said. “Really incredible.” To contact the reporters on this story: Tom Moroney in Boston at Or tmorrone@bloomberg.net Karen Leigh in Washington at kleigh@bloomberg.net .

Read the full article →

Dave Johnson: President Obama’s Upcoming "Section 421 Tire Case" Trade Enforcement Decision

August 28, 2009

This post originally appeared at Campaign for America’s Future (CAF) at their Blog for OurFuture as part of the Making It In America project. I am a Fellow with CAF. When China was accepted into the World Trade Organization, they agreed that if we experienced import surges of Chinese goods that caused “market disruption,” we would be allowed to limit the import of those goods. The particular section of the agreement is called “Section 421.” When the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) determines that the level of imports from China cause or threaten to cause market disruption to American producers of competitive products, it proposes a remedy that can include quotas or other relief. The President of the United States then makes a decision whether to enforce that recommendation. President Bush repeatedly (seven times) refused to enforce Section 421 even when our own ITC found that American companies, factories and jobs were being lost. Bush claimed at the time that the destructive effects of dramatic, sudden increases in Chinese imports that Section 421 was meant to mitigate were actually good for the U.S. economy. Bush’s policy was the opposite of “protectionism” — it actually favored China’s companies over our own! (I think we’ve seen how that has worked out.) Very soon we will have an opportunity to see where President Obama comes down on this issue . The ITC has decided by a 4-2 vote that the U.S. tire industry has been harmed by a large increase in imports. They have recommended increasing tariffs starting at 55%, falling to 35% over three years. The Office of the U.S. Trade Representative now has to give its recommendation on this to the White House by Sept. 2. President Obama has until Sept. 17 to make a decision. This is just one week before the upcoming G-20 summit in Pittsburgh. There is considerable pressure on him to to signal that the US will restore trade balance and help manufacturing in America, by following the rules of the WTO that China agreed to. According to the United Steel Workers , which represents workers in the tire industry, thousands of jobs are being lost and tire plans in the US are shutting down. Also at this page is a chart from the ITC showing that the benefits of enforcing remedies “are two-and-a-half times greater than the costs” to consumers. Mike Elk wrote the other day at the Campaign for America’s Future blog, President Obama stands at a crossroads in the fight to rebuild the American economy. President Obama has made a commitment in the past to uphold previously signed trade agreements. China, however, is violating these agreements by flooding the market with a massive 300 percent increase in tire imports in an attempt to wipe out American tire manufacturers. In 2004, China sent 14 million tires to the U.S. valued at $453 million. By last year, that had increased to 46 million tires valued at $1.7 billion. Mike also points out, Chinese importers, in conjunction with the Chinese Chamber of Commerce, have ironically formed a lobbying front group ironically named American Coalition for Free Trade in Tires. The coalition is run by Jochum, Shore & Trossevin, a Washington D.C. lobby firm run by former Bush trade officials who are cashing in on their years of U.S. government service to advise foreign competitors. Jim Wansley, former USW Goodyear local president, testified about the impact of the closing of the Goodyear plant in Tyler, Texas where he had worked for 39 1/2 years: The closure put hundreds of workers, many of whom had given decades of service to the plant, out of work. The closure was devastating to the workers and their families, but it is also being felt throughout the community of Tyler, Texas. Tyler has a population of about 100,000. Like many small and medium-sized towns that depend on manufacturing for middle class jobs, the loss of these jobs has taken its toll. The Goodyear plant directly benefitted the local economy by supporting local small businesses who served as its suppliers and service providers. The plant also provided enormous indirect benefits. Jobs at the plant paid good wages and benefits, enabling workers to lead decent middle class lives, buy homes, send their kids to college, and save for retirement. These are the kind of jobs that support an entire community as families pay their doctor bills, buy new cars, and contribute to local charities. The plant and its workers were also an important source of tax revenue for the city, the county, and the state. . . . The victims will not only be the workers and their families, but the suppliers, service providers, local businesses, and entire communities that depend on the industry. In sum, there is an enormous cost to doing nothing. If more plants like Tyler close, we can expect to suffer total additional losses of almost a billion dollars per plant, per year. On the other hand, The Washington Post points out, If Obama backs the tariff, he risks upsetting the Chinese at a time when the United States needs China to keep buying U.S. government debt to fund stimulus efforts. This is not just an intellectual discussion. This, like all trade issues, is about American workers losing their livelihoods and communities losing their economic base. At the same time the policies of the Bush administration — borrowing trillions of dollars from them while allowing our manufacturing base to deteriorate — have placed China in a very strong position of economic advantage which gives them the power to demand concessions. For more information : USW fact sheets, background, other info related to tire trade case against China Statements by Senators, other lawmakers supportive of USW unfair trade case claim against Chinese tires More Members of Congress, Senate praise ITC ruling in tire trade case A post at TradeReform.org: Trade Community Awaits President’s Decision on China Tire Safeguard Testimony of Senator Sherrod Brown before the U.S. ITC on the tire issue. Gilbert B. Kaplan, Former Deputy Assistant and Acting Assistant Secretary of the U. S. Department of Commerce, writing at Huffington Post on this and other trade issues with China . ManufactureThis.org: Making the Case for Relief from Chinese Tire Imports One group in opposition to this ruling is American tire distributors , who benefit from the low prices of Chinese imports. (Note this is published by the Chinese Xinhua News Agency.)

Read the full article →

Getting Rich in Malaysian Capital of Cronyism Means Dayak Lose Rain Forest

August 25, 2009

By Yoolim Lee Aug. 25 (Bloomberg) — After a stomach-churning takeoff from a 550-meter runway at Long Banga airstrip on the Malaysian side of the island of Borneo, the 19-seat plane soars over a green tropical wilderness. This is one of the world’s last remaining virgin rain forests. About 30 minutes into the flight to the bustling oil town of Miri, the lush landscape changes, and neatly terraced fields of oil palms take the place of jungle. Twenty years ago, this was forestland. Now, those forests are lost forever. The shift from rain forest to oil palm cultivation in Malaysia’s Sarawak state highlights the struggle taking place between forces favoring economic development, led by Sarawak state’s chief minister, Abdul Taib Mahmud , and those who want to conserve the rain forest and the ways of life it supports. During Taib’s 28-year rule, his government has handed out concessions for logging and supported the federal government’s megaprojects, including the largest hydropower site in the country and, most recently, oil palm plantations. The projects are rolling back the frontiers of Borneo’s rain forest, home to nomadic people and rare wildlife such as orangutans and proboscis monkeys. At least four prominent Sarawak companies that have received contracts or concessions have ties to Taib or his family. Transforming Malaysia The government of Malaysia plans to transform the country into a developed nation by 2020 through a series of projects covering everything from electric power generation to education. The country’s gross domestic product , which has been growing at an average 6.7 percent annual pace since 1970, shrank 6.2 percent in the first quarter. In Sarawak, Taib’s government is following its own development plans that call for doubling the state’s GDP to 150 billion ringgit ($42 billion) by 2020. Sarawak Energy Bhd., which is 65 percent owned by the state government, said in July 2007 it plans to build six power plants, including hydropower and coal-fired generators. The state government also wants to expand the acreage in Sarawak devoted to oil palms to 1 million hectares (2.5 million acres) by 2010, from 744,000 at the end of 2008, according to Sarawak’s Ministry of Land Development . Companies that formerly chopped down hardwood trees and exported the timber are now moving into palm plantations. Lawsuits Filed Meanwhile, many of the ethnic groups who have traditionally lived from the land in Sarawak — known as Dayaks — have filed lawsuits that aim to block some projects and seek better compensation. Sarawak’s ambitions could be hindered by a lack of good governance, which would shut out overseas investors, says Steve Waygood , head of sustainable and responsible investment research at Aviva Investors in London, which manages more than $3 billion in sustainable assets. “Even just the perception of corruption can lead to restricted inflows of capital from the global investment community into emerging markets such as Sarawak,” says Waygood, who wrote about reputational risk in a 2006 book, “Capital Market Campaigning” (Risk Books). “The largest and most responsible financial institutions are very careful to avoid funding unsustainable developments,” he says. Unilever, which buys 1.5 million tons of palm oil a year — 4 percent of the world’s supply — for use in products such as Dove soap and Flora margarine, announced in May that it would buy only from sustainable sources. No Direct Purchases “Unilever does not source any palm oil directly from Sarawak,” says Jan Kees Vis, Unilever’s director of sustainable agriculture. “We buy from plantation companies and traders located elsewhere.” He says Unilever has committed by 2015 to buy all of its palm oil from sources certified by the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil, a group representing palm oil producers, consumers and nongovernmental organizations that seeks to establish standards for sustainably produced palm oil. The Malaysian Palm Oil Association , a government-supported group of Malaysian plantation companies, is a member of the RSPO. About 35 percent of the world’s cooking oil comes from palm — more than any other plant, according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture . And 90 percent of the world’s palm oil comes from Malaysia and Indonesia. Skittles and Soap The oil is an ingredient used in everything from Skittles candy to Palmolive soap to some kinds of biodiesel fuel. Palm oil futures have climbed 45 percent this year as of Aug. 24 on concern that dry weather caused by El Nino may reduce output. Crude oil prices rose to a 10-month high of $74.24 a barrel, spurring demand for biodiesel. Malaysia lost 6.6 percent of its forest cover from 1990 to 2005, or 1.49 million hectares, the most-recent data available from the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization show. That’s an area equivalent to the state of Connecticut. Neighboring Indonesia lost forestland at the fastest annual rate among the world’s 44 forest nations from 2000 to 2005, Amsterdam-based Greenpeace says. “Palm oil is the new green gold after timber,” says Mark Bujang, executive director of the Borneo Resources Institute in Miri, a city of about 230,000 people in Sarawak. “It has become the most destructive force after three decades of unsustainable logging.” While Malaysia’s palm oil exports have more than doubled to a record 46 billion ringgit in 2008 from 2006, according to the country’s central bank, the gain has come at a price. Displaced People Development projects and palm plantations have displaced thousands of people, some of whom have lived for centuries by fishing, hunting and farming in the jungle. Almost 200 lawsuits are pending in the Sarawak courts relating to claims by Dayak people on lands being used for oil palms and logging, according to Baru Bian, a land rights lawyer representing many of the claimants. A handful of activists have been found dead under mysterious circumstances or disappeared, including Swiss environmental activist Bruno Manser, who vanished in the jungle in 2000. Cutting down rain forests to cultivate palms in Sarawak has consequences far beyond Malaysia, says Janet Larsen , director of research at the Washington-based Earth Policy Institute . The forests that are being destroyed help modulate the climate because they remove vast stores of carbon from the atmosphere. Chopping down the trees ends up releasing greenhouse gases. ‘Lungs of the Planet’ “These last remaining forests are the lungs of the planet,” Larsen says. “It affects us all.” Chief Minister Taib, 73, has multiple roles in Sarawak. He’s also the state’s finance minister and its planning and resources management minister — a role that gives him the power to dispense land, forestry and palm oil concessions as well as the power to approve infrastructure projects. Until last year, Taib held the additional role of chairman of the Sarawak Timber Industry Development Corp ., which fosters wood-based industries in the state. Anwar Ibrahim , the former Malaysian finance minister who’s the head of the country’s opposition alliance, sees parallels between Taib’s rule and those of other long-standing leaders in Southeast Asia, such as former Indonesian President Suharto and former Philippine leader Ferdinand Marcos . “It’s an authoritarian style of governance to protect their turf and their families,” says Anwar, who was fired as deputy prime minister by then Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad in 1998 and jailed on charges of having homosexual sex and abusing power. The sodomy conviction was overturned in 2004. ‘Driven by Greed’ Sim Kwang Yang, an opposition member of parliament for Sarawak’s capital city of Kuching from 1982 to 1995, agrees with Anwar’s assessment. “It is crony capitalism driven by greed without any regard for the people,” he says. Taib’s adult children and his late wife, Lejla, together owned more than 29.3 percent of Cahya Mata Sarawak Bhd., the state’s largest industrial group, with 40 companies involved in construction, property development, road maintenance, trading and financial services, according to the company’s 2008 annual report. Local residents jokingly say that the company’s initials, CMS, stand for “Chief Minister and Sons.” In total, CMS has won about 1.3 billion ringgit worth of projects from the state and the federal government since the beginning of 2005, according to the firm’s stock exchange filings. Taib declined to comment for this article. In an interview he gave to Malaysia’s state news agency, Bernama, on Jan. 13, 2001, Taib said CMS’s ties to him had nothing to do with its winning government jobs. ‘Not Involved’ in Contracts “I am not involved in the award of contracts,” he said. “No politician in Sarawak is involved in the award of contracts.” He told Bernama he doesn’t ask for special treatment of his sons. “I never ask anybody to do any favors,” he said. Mahmud Abu Bekir Taib , the elder of Taib’s two sons, is CMS’s deputy chairman and owns 8.92 percent of the firm, according to the annual report. Sulaiman Abdul Rahman Taib , the younger son and CMS’s chairman until 2008, holds an 8.94 percent stake. Taib’s two daughters and his son-in-law are also listed in the annual report as “substantial shareholders.” Taib’s History Taib, a Muslim who belongs to the Melanau group — one of about 27 different ethnic groups in Sarawak — entered politics at the age of 27 after graduating from the University of Adelaide in Australia with a law degree in 1960. He held various ministerial positions in Sarawak and Malaysia before taking over in 1981 as the chief minister from his uncle, Abdul Rahman Yaakub. Rahman, now 81, ruled Sarawak for 11 years. Taib, who has silver hair, appears almost daily on the front pages of Sarawak newspapers, sometimes sporting a goatee and a pair of rimless glasses, at the opening of new development projects or local events. He lives in Sarawak’s capital city of Kuching, an urban area of about 600,000 people on the Sarawak River. Its picturesque waterfront is dotted with colonial buildings, the legacy of British adventurer James Brooke, who founded the Kingdom of Sarawak in 1841 and became known as the White Rajah. Brooke’s heirs ruled the kingdom until 1946, when Charles Vyner Brooke ceded his rights to the U.K. Sarawak joined the Federation of Malaysia on Sept. 16, 1963, along with other former British colonies. Cousin’s Role At Taib’s mansion, which overlooks the river, he receives guests in a living room decorated with gilt-edged European-style sofa sets, according to photos in the July to December 2006 newsletter of Naim Cendera Holdings Bhd., which changed its name to Naim Holdings Bhd . in March. Naim is a property developer and contractor whose chairman is Taib’s cousin, Abdul Hamed Sepawi . He is also chairman of state power company Sarawak Energy and timber company Ta Ann Holdings Bhd., and is on the board of Sarawak Timber Industry Development Corp. and Sarawak Plantation Bhd. Naim and CMS jointly built Kuching’s iconic waterfront building, the umbrella-roofed, nine-story Sarawak State Legislative Assembly complex. Naim has won more than 3.3 billion ringgit worth of contracts from the state and the federation since 2005, its stock exchange filings show. Companies Respond Ricky Kho , a spokesman for Naim, said the company declined to comment for this article. Naim’s deputy managing director, Sharifuddin Wahab , said in an interview with Bloomberg News in July 2007 that the chairman’s family ties weren’t why the company won government contracts. “We have been able to execute our projects on time, we stick to the budget and the quality of what we hand over to the government is up to their expectations, if not more,” he said. “Our teams have always acted professionally” when working with the government, whether on large or small projects, CMS’s group managing director, Richard Curtis , said in an e-mail. “CMS is governed by the strict listing regulations of the Malaysian stock exchange,” he said, adding that the chairman and the group managing director are both independent. “The large projects carry with them an equally large risk, including a huge reputational risk, particularly for crucial projects by the government,” he said. “It is the government’s prerogative and discretion to award projects using a variety of approaches that includes open and closed tenders as well as directly negotiated processes, to the contractors and developers they feel will deliver the project as promised.” Malaysia’s reputation as a place to conduct business has deteriorated in recent years, according to Transparency International , the Berlin-based advocacy group that publishes an annual Corruption Perceptions Index. ‘Monument of Corruption’ Transparency ranked the country 47th out of 180 in 2008, down from 43rd in 2007. Transparency also has singled out the Bakun Hydroelectric Dam, under construction on the Balui River in Sarawak, as a “monument of corruption.” The index lacks fairness, says Ahmad Said Hamdan, chief commissioner of the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission , because it doesn’t take into consideration the size of the population of the countries in the ranking, for example. “I’ve seen a lot of improvement in civil service in the past 10 years,” he says. Dead Fish Early this year, hundreds of dead fish started floating on the muddy river near the Bakun dam site. The fish were killed by siltation, which was triggered by uncontrolled logging upstream, Sarawak’s assistant minister of environment and public health, Abang Abdul Rauf Abang Zen, says. He says the Bakun dam has very strict environmental assessments and isn’t to blame for the siltation. In January, Tenaga Nasional Bhd. , Malaysia’s state- controlled power utility, and Sarawak Energy said they won approval from the national government to take over the operation of the hydropower project through a leasing agreement. Sarawak Energy also won preliminary approval to export about 1,600 megawatts of electricity from the 2,400-megawatt Bakun project, once it begins operating, to Peninsular Malaysia. The remaining power will go to Sarawak. Taib announced a plan called New Concept in 1994. The aim was to bring together local people, with their customary rights to the land, and private shareholders, who would provide capital and expertise to create plantations. The plan called for companies to hold a 60 percent stake in the joint ventures, the state to own 10 percent and the remaining 30 percent to go to local communities in return for a 60-year lease on their land. ‘Emotional’ Disputes That time period equals about two complete cycles of oil palm development. An oil palm typically matures in 3 years, reaches peak production from 5 to 7 years and continues to produce for about 25 years, says Nirgunan Tiruchelvam, a commodities analyst at Royal Bank of Scotland Group Plc in Singapore. The policy has led to some disagreements. In his interview with Bernama in 2001, Taib said land acquisitions by the state have led to “emotional” disputes because some people seek too much compensation. “We are not allowed to pay more than market value,” he told Bernama. He said people need to prove that they have traditionally lived in an area — for example, by providing an aerial photograph — in order for the state to grant them title to the land. “If there are disputes, they go to the court,” Taib told Bernama. Some local people say they received no compensation at all for their land. In Kampung Lebor, a village about a two-hour drive from Kuching, 160 families, members of the Iban group that was formerly headhunters, live in longhouses and survive by fishing and some farming. The Iban are Sarawak’s largest single group of Dayaks, who make up about half of the state’s 2.3 million population. Land Overlap In mid-1996, the state handed out parcels of land that overlapped with the community’s customary hunting and fishing areas to the Land Custody and Development Authority and Nirwana Muhibbah Bhd., a palm oil company in Kuching. In mid-1997, the authority and the company cleared the land with bulldozers and planted oil palm seedlings, according to a copy of Kampung Lebor’s writ of summons filed to the High Court in Kuching. Government ‘Cruel’ “The government is cruel,” says Jengga Jeli, 54, a father of five in Lebor. “Fruit trees have been cut down. It’s become harder to hunt and fish. Now we are forced to get meat and vegetables from the bazaar, and we are very poor.” Jengga’s village filed a lawsuit in 1998 against Nirwana, LCDA and the state government in a bid to get compensation. The case was finally heard in 2006 and is now awaiting judgment, according to Baru Bian, who is representing the Iban in Kampung Lebor. Reginal Kevin Akeu, a lawyer at Abdul Rahim Sarkawi Razak Tready Fadillah & Co. Advocates, which is representing Nirwana and LCDA, declined to comment. The cases show that the development projects, including plantations and dams, haven’t helped poverty among the local people, many of whom live without adequate electricity or schools, says Richard Leete, who served as the resident representative of the United Nations Development Program for Malaysia, Singapore and Brunei from 2003 to 2008. Poverty Remains “This is the paradox of Sarawak — the great wealth it has, the natural resources in such abundance, and yet such an impoverishment and the real hardship these communities are suffering,” says Leete, who chronicled Malaysia’s progress since its independence from Britain in his book “Malaysia: From Kampung to Twin Towers” (Oxford Fajar, 2007). “There has no doubt been a lot of money politics,” he says. In the rugged hills about 150 kilometers (93 miles) south of Kuching, some 160 Bidayuh families, known as the Land Dayaks, are clinging to their traditional habitat, while a dam is under construction nearby. They live by farming and fishing. With only a primary school in the village, children have to go to boarding schools outside the jungle to get further education, crossing seven handmade bamboo bridges and trekking two hours over the hills when they return home. The state has offered the Bidayuhs 7,500 ringgit per hectare, 80 ringgit per rubber tree and 60 ringgit per durian fruit tree in compensation for their native land, says Simo ak Sekam, 48, a resident of Kampung Rejoi, one of four villages in the area. In Rejoi, about half of 39 families have refused. Bamboo Bridges “We don’t want to move because we are happy here,” Simo says. “We feel very sad because our land will be covered with water. The young generations won’t know this land. They won’t see the bamboo bridges.” The builder of the local reservoir is Naim Holdings — the company headed by Chief Minister Taib’s cousin. The government awarded Naim the 310.7 million-ringgit contract without putting it out for bids. Naim’s statement announcing the deal in July 2007 said it won the job on a “negotiated basis.” One of the most threatened groups is the Penan, nomadic people who live deep in the jungle on the upper reaches of the Baram River. On a steamy equatorial morning in late October 2007, Long Kerong village leader Kelesau Naan and his wife, Uding Lidem, walked two hours to their rice-storing hut. Kelesau, who was in his late 70s and who had protested logging activity in their area, told Uding he’d go check on an animal trap he had set nearby. He never came back. Skull and Bones Found Two months later, his skull and several pieces of his bones, along with his necklace made of red, yellow and white beads, surfaced on the banks of the Segita River. Inspector Sumarno Lamundi at the regional police station says the investigation is ongoing. It was just the latest tragedy among activists working for the Penan since the early 1990s, when rampant logging took place. At least two other Penan were found dead, including Abung Ipui, a pastor and an advocate for land rights for his village. His body was found in October 1994 with his stomach cut open. Manser, the Swiss activist for the rights of the Penan, vanished without a trace from the Borneo rain forests in May 2000 and was officially declared missing in March 2005. Kelesau’s death has made the Penan willing to stand up for their survival. “We are scared of something terrible happening to us if we don’t resist,” says grim-faced Bilong Oyoi, 48, headman of Long Sait, a Penan settlement close to Long Kerong. Penans’ Resistance Bilong, who wears a traditional rattan hat decorated with hornbill feathers, says his group is setting up blockades to resist logging activities. They are also working with NGOs to get attention for their plight and filing lawsuits. With the help of the Basel, Switzerland-based Bruno Manser Fund , an NGO set up by the late activist, Bilong and 76 other Penan sent a letter — which some signed using only thumb prints — to Gilles Pelisson , the chief executive officer of French hotel chain Accor SA. The letter urged Accor to think twice about partnering with logging company Interhill Logging Sdn. to build a 388-room Novotel Interhill in Kuching. The Penan community says Interhill’s operations in Sarawak have a devastating effect on them. Accor responded by sending a fact-finding mission to Sarawak to investigate Interhill’s logging activities. “If the worst-case scenario occurs and if no action plan is implemented, we will not continue with our partnership,” Helene Roques, Accor’s director for sustainable development in Paris, said in June. In mid-August, she said she expects “good results” by the end of September. Rio Tinto Venture No foreign investor has made a larger bet on Taib’s development plans than Rio Tinto Alcan, a unit of London-based mining company Rio Tinto Plc . A joint venture between Rio Tinto and CMS for a $2 billion aluminum smelter has been negotiating power purchase agreements with Sarawak Energy for more than 12 months, according to Julia Wilkins, a Rio Tinto Alcan spokeswoman in Brisbane, Australia. CMS meets Rio Tinto’s requirements as a joint-venture partner, she says. “CMS is a main-board-listed company with its own board of directors,” she says. “It has a free float of shares in excess of the minimum market requirement. The chairman and the group managing director are both independent.” Malaysia grants special economic advantages to the country’s Malay majority and the local people of Sabah and Sarawak states on Borneo, collectively referred to as Bumiputra — literally, sons of the soil. Still, the country is leaving behind many of its ethnic minorities, says Colin Nicholas, a Malaysian activist of Eurasian descent who has written a book about the mainland’s oldest community, “The Orang Asli and the Contest for Resources” (IWGIA, 2000). ‘Completely Powerless’ One person trying to help the Dayaks is See Chee How, 45, a land rights lawyer who became an activist after meeting Sim, the former opposition member of parliament in Kuching. In 1994, See witnessed an attack on Penan demonstrators who’d erected a roadblock to prevent logging trucks from driving through their land. A 6-year-old boy died after security forces used tear gas on the demonstrators, he says. “They were completely powerless,” recalls the soft-spoken, crew-cut See, sporting a white T-shirt and a pair of jeans, in his office above a bustling market in Kuching. “They were depending on logging trucks to move around because their passageways had been destroyed by logging trails.” See now works with Baru Bian, 51, one of the first land rights lawyers representing the Dayaks in Sarawak. Lawsuits and Votes Nicholas says Sarawak’s people have to fight for their rights not only through lawsuits but by voting. “The biggest problem we have with indigenous people’s rights is that we have the federal government and state government run and dictated by people who have no respect or interest for indigenous people,” he says. “We need a change of government.” The prime minister’s office declined to comment. Opposition leader Anwar says change is possible. His alliance won control of an unprecedented five states in Peninsular Malaysia in a March 2008 election. Malaysian Prime Minister Najib Razak ’s ruling coalition has lost at least four regional polls held this year. “I think this is a turning point,” Anwar says. Still, Taib’s coalition won 30 of Sarawak’s 31 seats in March 2008 parliamentary elections. That helped the ruling National Front coalition led by then Prime Minister Abdullah Ahmad Badawi retain a 58-seat majority, ahead of Anwar’s People’s Alliance. Sarawak is due to hold the next election by 2011. Taib defended his government’s program to turn forestlands into oil palm plantations as a way of improving living standards for the Dayaks at a seminar on native land development in Miri on April 18, 2000. “Land without development is a poverty trap,” he said, according to his Web site . Many Dayak people, who have seen their land transformed as a result of Taib’s policies and companies linked to him, say they are still waiting to see their share of wealth. To contact the reporter on this story: Yoolim Lee in Singapore at yoolim@bloomberg.net

Read the full article →

Joanne W. Jolin Joins HomeBanc as Vice President, SBA Loan Specialist

August 20, 2009

TAMPA, FL–(Marketwire – August 20, 2009) – Tampa-based HomeBancorp, Inc. has named Joanne W. Jolin as Vice President, SBA Loan Specialist for HomeBanc. She is based in HomeBanc’s Lake Mary loan production office, located at 100 Colonial Center Parkway, Suite 110. Ms. Jolin brings to HomeBanc more than 30 years of commercial banking experience, with 13 years specializing in Small Business Administration lending. Her professional affiliations include membership in CREW Orlando (Commercial Real Estate Women), serving on the CREW Community Outreach Committee, and membership in SBRN (Small Business Resource Network) Central Florida Chapter, serving on the Steering Committee. Ms. Jolin can be reached at (321) 832-1355 or joanne.jolin@homebanc.com .

Read the full article →

Colonial BancGroup Shut Down By Feds In Biggest US Bank Failure This Year

August 15, 2009

MARCY GORDON, AP Business Writer Marcy Gordon, Ap Business Writer WASHINGTON – Real estate lender Colonial BancGroup Inc. has been shut down by federal officials in the biggest U.S. bank failure this year. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corp., which was appointed receiver of the Montgomery, Ala.-based Colonial and its about $25 billion in assets, said the failed bank’s 346 branches in Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Nevada and Texas will reopen at the normal times starting on Saturday as offices of Winston-Salem, N.C.-based BB&T. The FDIC has approved the sale of Colonial’s $20 billion in deposits and about $22 billion of its assets to BB&T Corp. Regulators also closed four other banks: Community Bank of Arizona, based in Phoenix; Union Bank, based in Gilbert, Ariz.; Community Bank of Nevada, based in Las Vegas; and Dwelling House Savings and Loan Association, located in Pittsburgh. The closures boosted to 77 the number of federally insured banks that have failed in 2009. The agency established a temporary government bank for Community Bank of Nevada to give depositors about 30 days to open accounts at other financial institutions. The failed bank had assets of $1.52 billion and deposits of $1.38 billion as of June 30. Community Bank of Arizona had assets of $158.5 million and deposits of $143.8 million as of June 30, while Union Bank had assets of $124 million and deposits of $112 million as of June 12. The FDIC said that MidFirst Bank, based in Oklahoma City, has agreed to assume all the deposits and $125.5 million of the assets of Community Bank of Arizona, as well as about $24 million of the deposits and $11 million of the assets of Union Bank. The FDIC will retain the rest for eventual sale. Dwelling House had $13.4 million in assets and $13.8 million in deposits as of March 31. PNC Bank, part of Pittsburgh-based PNC Financial Services Group Inc., has agreed to assume all of Dwelling House’s deposits and about $3 million of its assets; the FDIC will retain the rest for eventual sale. The failure of Colonial is expected to cost the deposit insurance fund an estimated $2.8 billion and that of Community Bank of Nevada, $781.5 million; Union Bank, $61 million; Community Bank of Arizona, $25.5 million; and Dwelling House, $6.8 million. The 77 bank failures nationwide this year compare with 25 last year and three in 2007. As the economy has soured — with unemployment rising, home prices tumbling and loan defaults soaring — bank failures have cascaded and sapped billions out of the deposit insurance fund. It now stands at its lowest level since 1993, $13 billion as of the first quarter. While losses on home mortgages may be leveling off, delinquencies on commercial real estate loans remain a hot spot of potential trouble, FDIC officials say. If the recession deepens, defaults on the high-risk loans could spike. Many regional banks hold large numbers of them. The number of banks on the FDIC’s list of problem institutions leaped to 305 in the first quarter — the highest number since 1994 during the savings and loan crisis — from 252 in the fourth quarter. The FDIC expects U.S. bank failures to cost the insurance fund around $70 billion through 2013. The May closing of struggling Florida thrift BankUnited FSB is expected to cost the insurance fund $4.9 billion, the second-largest hit since the financial crisis began. The costliest was the July 2008 seizure of big California lender IndyMac Bank, on which the insurance fund is estimated to have lost $10.7 billion. The largest U.S. bank failure ever also came last year: Seattle-based thrift Washington Mutual Inc. fell in September, with about $307 billion in assets. It was acquired by JPMorgan Chase & Co. for $1.9 billion in a deal brokered by the FDIC.

Read the full article →

U.S. Bank Failures Rise to 72 This Year With Collapses in Florida, Oregon

August 8, 2009

By Alison Vekshin and Ari Levy Aug. 7 (Bloomberg) — Two lenders in Florida and one in Oregon collapsed, pushing the number of failures to 72 this year amid the worst economic slump since the Great Depression. First State Bank and Community National Bank, both based in Sarasota, Florida, and Community First Bank in Prineville, Oregon, were shut by regulators, and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. was named receiver, the FDIC said in statements today. Closing the lenders, with combined assets of $769 million and deposits of $662 million, will cost the deposit insurance fund about $185 million. Regulators are closing banks at the fastest pace in 17 years as losses mount from unpaid real-estate debt. The FDIC is offering to share losses with potential buyers, reviving a practice used during the U.S. savings-and-loan crisis in the late 1980s. Stearns Bank of St. Cloud, Minnesota, will assume almost all deposits of the Florida banks, the FDIC said. First State, the biggest of today’s failures with $463 million in assets and $387 million in deposits, had nine branches along Florida’s Gulf coast that will open Aug. 10 as Stearns branches, according to the FDIC. Community National’s four offices will open tomorrow under the Stearns name, the agency said. Stearns is paying a 0.25 percent premium for Community National’s $93 million in deposits and the FDIC is sharing losses on most of the $545 million assets being acquired from the two failed lenders. Home Federal Bank in Nampa, Idaho, is buying most of Community First’s $182 million in deposits and 94 percent of its $209 million in assets. The FDIC is sharing losses on $155 million of assets in the deal. The eight branches of Community First will reopen on Aug. 10 as offices of Home Federal. The FDIC, based in Washington, insures deposits at more than 8,200 institutions with $13.5 trillion in assets and reimburses customers for deposits of up to $250,000 when a bank fails. This year’s failures have cost the insurance fund more than $15 billion. To contact the reporters on this story: Alison Vekshin in Washington at avekshin@bloomberg.net ; Ari Levy in San Francisco at alevy5@bloomberg.net .

Read the full article →

Money-Laundering Rabbis Case in Los Angeles Mirrors New Jersey’s Scandal

August 3, 2009

By Linda Sandler and David Voreacos Aug. 3 (Bloomberg) — Prosecutors in Los Angeles leveled charges in 2007 that sound like headlines in a fresh New Jersey corruption scandal: Rabbis in Brooklyn, New York, laundered money for an undercover informant, arranged phony charitable gifts and used secret Israeli bank accounts.

Read the full article →

Five U.S. Banks Are Seized by Regulators, Bringing This Year’s Tally to 69

August 1, 2009

By Ari Levy and Margaret Chadbourn Aug. 1 (Bloomberg) — Banks in New Jersey, Ohio, Florida, Oklahoma and Illinois were shut, pushing the toll of failed U.S. lenders to 69 this year, amid a 26-year high in unemployment and the worst economic slump since the Great Depression. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corp

Read the full article →

Michael Meranze: Jefferson’s Epitaph…and Ours

July 31, 2009

While I watched the theater of the absurd that produced the 2009-2010 California Budget my thoughts kept returning to Thomas Jefferson. Jefferson — first Secretary of State, second Vice-President, third President of the United States — drew up his own epitaph shortly before he died

Read the full article →

Michael Meranze: Jefferson’s Epitaph…and Ours

July 31, 2009

While I watched the theater of the absurd that produced the 2009-2010 California Budget my thoughts kept returning to Thomas Jefferson. Jefferson — first Secretary of State, second Vice-President, third President of the United States — drew up his own epitaph shortly before he died. Jefferson’s epitaph was simple — and it did not include his public offices or his many awards.

Read the full article →

Rep. Barney Frank: The "Loan Arrangers" Will Not Ride Again

July 29, 2009

This post was originally delivered as a speech at the National Press Club on July 27, 2009 Streaming video Thank you. I very much appreciate the forum that the Press Club offers for these kinds of discussions and let me reinforce what may have been an entirely unnecessary admonition. No one who has been familiar with the media in America could ever think hearing those applause that it came from members of the media. I want to first address an issue about financial reform that puts it in context.

Read the full article →

Stephanie Wei: General Motors to Drop Sponsorship: Goodbye Buick Open

July 28, 2009

Ah, more chatter about golf sponsors. This week’s Buick Open in Grand Blanc, Michigan, will be the last.

Read the full article →