companies

Huffington Post…

WASHINGTON — A federal judge has rejected the tobacco industry’s latest effort to end a case in which the companies were found to have concealed the dangers of smoking for decades. The nation’s largest cigarette manufacturers had argued that U.S. District Judge Gladys Kessler no longer has jurisdiction in the government’s landmark lawsuit against the companies because a 2009 law empowers the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to regulate the industry. The companies say that in light of the FDA’s powers, there is no longer a reasonable likelihood they will commit violations. Kessler ruled that argument unconvincing. The judge is considering forcing the companies to pay for a campaign of “corrective” statements on the addictiveness of nicotine and the lack of health benefit from cigarettes sold as “low tar,” “ultra-light” or “mild.”

See original here:
Judge Rules Against Big Tobacco In Lawsuit

Find our Weekly Commercial Real Estate, Private Equity and Fund Newsletters at www.WeeklyBrief.net

{ 0 comments }

Huffington Post…

Google may have unveiled a digital wallet, but it’s not your money they care about. It’s your data. The Internet giant announced plans to roll out the Google Wallet this summer, a mobile app that allows users to swipe their phones at the register using near-field communication (NFC) technology, instead of carrying a credit card. Google has partnered with Citibank, Mastercard, First Data, Sprint and certain retailers to back up the product, making it the first digital wallet to launch with such a comprehensive collection of partnerships. But analysts say despite Google’s speed in getting its product to market and the range of its partnerships, the digital wallet space is still too young to proclaim Google the definitive victor, especially given that the Google Wallet will work on only one phone, with one credit card, from one bank, for a handful of retailers. And it may not even be competitors in the payment space that truly have cause for concern, but rather the other Internet companies looking to tap into the consumer data Google now has special access to. “They have some very significant challenges ahead of them,” said Rick Oglesby, senior analyst at the Aite Group, a financial research and consulting firm. “There are a tremendous number of players in the space. Google’s hitting the ground first. They have a big first mover advantage, but they have to work hard to continue the momentum.” Experts say that Google’s approach to its Google Wallet sticks with traditional payments methods: It relies on users’ existing credit cards and uses the infrastructure that has been in place for years. By partnering with the companies that manage payments at every level–the banks that issue cards, the card companies, the companies behind cash register technologies, the security management for the card data–Google makes it clear that it’s not trying to displace traditional financial institutions or ways of paying. Google won’t be taking a cut of transaction fees, leaving credit card companies’ revenue untapped. Instead, Google Wallet targets at other companies aiming to provide their own digital wallet systems. The field is already crowded with players ranging from credit card company Visa to upstart startup Square to wireless-carrier effort ISIS. Though not yet official, it’s also been rumored that Apple’s next iPhone will have near field communication . “Moving data back and forth to effect a payment — they’re not going to try and worry about that,” said Oglesby. “What they’re also trying to do, what all these providers are trying to do, is this new business component: providing a wallet.” Though the Google Wallet is the most complete iteration of a digital wallet to hit the market, its limitations mean that for ordinary people, it won’t make much of a splash. “I would say from a consumer perspective this isn’t terribly significant,” said Oglesby. “But for the payment business it’s very significant. It’s someone getting on the ground and taking NFC and saying, ‘I’m going to make it work today.’” Analysts say the ultimate benefit Google gains from controlling such mobile wallet technology may have very little to do with the payments space. Through the Wallet, Google could gather huge amounts of customer data keyed to local actions and mobile use, a hugely valuable set of data that everyone on the web is working to get their hands on. “The competition will be with the coupons and the targeted offers,” said Aaron McPherson, a practice analyst at IDC Financial Insights, a financial technology research firm. “Because that’s where you have to get customer information — that’s the holy grail.” Google could use its access to customers to drive the successful deployment of its Google Offers , the system of local deals and discounts tied to the Wallet. By serving up these special offers at the time people plan to spend money, specified to the place they are shopping, Google will have a huge advantage over rival deals sites like Groupon. “They get very, very granular information pertaining to what you buy, when you buy, and that information is gold,” said Nick Holland, senior analyst at the Yankee Group, a tech research firm. “In one fell swoop they have trumped anything from Foursquare or Groupon. Now Google owns location-based advertising in the physical world.” While Visa has announced plans to utilize NFC in the future in conjunction with its own digital wallet, and wireless-carrier backed ISIS has also decided to turn to credit card companies for a mobile wallet service, neither has actually delivered a concrete plan for how they might do so. Despite the fanfare, Google Wallet will have to work towards widespread customer adoption to achieve success. Though the digital wallet may appeal in a futuristic way, it’s not clear that it will actually be more convenient than carrying a physical wallet. After all, if your cell phone runs out of battery, there too goes your money. “When it comes to making payments with your primary credit card in North America, it’s really not that difficult. It’s not like it’s a big challenge for me to take my credit card out and swipe it,” said Brad Strothkamp, a principal analyst at Forrester Research, a tech research firm. “Any time we try to get the customer to change habits, there has to be a significant incremental benefit to the customer to essentially change behaviors they’ve had for 20 years. That is not a small task.” Google and its competitors face the difficulties inherent in forging a path through unexplored territory. It’s worth noting that the three major contenders in the field all come from entirely different industries, with Visa as the only company that actually deals in payments as its primary business. Google has managed to sidestep the rest by bringing in the wide cast of operators that control the different aspects of the payment industry, though it remains to be seen if financial companies like Visa, also pursuing mobile payments, will prove to be uncooperative in the future. Still, experts suggest that competitors might have anywhere from 12 to 18 months to ready their products without falling too far behind, as customer adoption of such technologies will likely be hampered by the lack of NFC enabled phones, small number of participating retailers, and the cooperation of credit cards and banks. “It’s great that they’re doing this and it will get everybody moving a little more quickly, but it’s not going to take over the world tomorrow,” said Oglesby. “It’s still going to take some time to play out.”

View original post here:
Google Doesn’t Want Your Money, Just Your Data

Find our Weekly Commercial Real Estate, Private Equity and Fund Newsletters at www.WeeklyBrief.net

{ 0 comments }

ATI Allied Health/NHA Names Derek Reid Director of Employer Relations

May 25, 2011

STILWELL, KS–(Marketwire – May 25, 2011) – ATI Allied Health and National Healthcareer Association (NHA), the allied health training and certification arms of Ascend Learning, today named industry veteran Derek Reid as director of Employer Relations. This appointment reinforces the companies’ commitment to building and maintaining strong partnerships with their allied health clients.

Read the full article →

Dennis Whittle: Treating Employees as People

May 23, 2011

Over the period 1998-2008, the stock of the companies voted “best to work for” appreciated nearly seven times as much as the stock of the average company. The most admired companies on Fortune Magazine’s list had double the market returns of their competitors over a seven year period. Only 13 percent of unhappy employees recommend their company’s products, vs. 78 percent of happy employees. Those are just some of the findings reported in Dave Ulrich and Wendy Ulrich’s book The Why of Work .

Read the full article →

10 Fastest Growing U.S. Industries

May 18, 2011

Over the course of the recession, major companies have failed, entire industries have withered. But at least a few have not only survived, but grown. IBISWorld’s recently released report, ” Top 10 Fastest Growing Industries ,” delves deeper into the trends discussed in last month’s report on dying industries . Except this time, their focusing on the good instead of the bad. Dying telecommunications and newspaper industries have made way for other companies based around internet and technology. No one’s revenue growth comes even close to that of voice over Internet protocol (VoIP) providers, like Skype, as the entire industry’s revenue grew by 194 percent in the las tyear. That could help explain Microsoft’s surprising decision to purchase the company for $8.5 billion earlier this month. Growing environmental concerns have helped companies focusing on alternative energy, specifically wind power, which has grown 16.9 percent over the last decade. And if there’s any industry that’s benefited from the collective tightening of corporations, it’s third-party administrators and insurance claims adjusters, both of which help clients increase efficiency and cut costs. Below are the the top ten fastest growing industries in the U.S. based on percentage increase in revenue:

Read the full article →

Antenna Welcomes Two New Members to Its Board of Directors

May 17, 2011

Graham Albutt and Gary Haroian Bring Wealth of Executive Leadership and Operational Experience at International Public Companies

Read the full article →

Judge H. Lee Sarokin: Supreme Court Rules That Small Claims Cannot Be Pursued Against Big Corporations

May 16, 2011

In all fairness, that is not exactly what the Supreme Court actually ruled, but that certainly is the effect of the ruling. The Court held that a suit which involved individual claims of $30.22 against AT&T Mobility could not proceed as a class action because the claimants had each agreed to arbitrate any disputes with the company. In reality, absent the vehicle of a class action, no one was going to pursue a claim for $30.22. So in the face of the millions of arbitration clauses that appear in all types of purchase, licensing and similar agreements (unbeknownst to consumers) their chance of recovering small claims has been effectively barred. No individual is going to spend the time and money to pursue such a claim in arbitration. Companies that do not have such clauses in their purchase or licensing agreements will certainly include them now. Raise your hand if you have ever read the agreement you sign with your telephone company or the licensing agreement you accept with your software. Consumers are totally at the mercy of the companies with whom they deal. Arbitration, indeed, makes good sense in many instances, but not where it is utilized to defeat claims, particularly such as the ones asserted here based upon fraud and false advertising. There has been some valid criticism of past class action abuses, but the very purpose of class actions was to permit persons to join together in situations such as this in which their individual claims were not worth pursuing or it was too expensive or difficult to do so. Although I have no knowledge as to the merits of the claims asserted here, in rendering this decision, the Supreme Court has permitted alleged corporate fraud to go unheard and unpunished and, in turn, has silenced the voice of the consumer in the process.

Read the full article →

Video: Blavatnik Agrees to Buy Warner Music for $8.25 a Share

May 6, 2011

May 6 (Bloomberg) — Warner Music Group former director Len Blavatnik has agreed to buy the record company in a transaction valued at about $3.3 billion. Blavatnik’s Access Industries Holdings will pay $8.25 a share, the companies said in a statement today. The sale of New York-based Warner comes after a three-month auction whose finalists included private-equity brothers Tom and Alex Gores and Sony/ATV Music Publishing. Bloomberg’s Cristina Alesci discusses the transaction on Bloomberg Television’s “InBusiness With Margaret Brennan.” (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Video: Blavatnik Agrees to Buy Warner Music for $8.25 a Share

May 6, 2011

May 6 (Bloomberg) — Warner Music Group former director Len Blavatnik has agreed to buy the record company in a transaction valued at about $3.3 billion. Blavatnik’s Access Industries Holdings will pay $8.25 a share, the companies said in a statement today. The sale of New York-based Warner comes after a three-month auction whose finalists included private-equity brothers Tom and Alex Gores and Sony/ATV Music Publishing. Bloomberg’s Cristina Alesci discusses the transaction on Bloomberg Television’s “InBusiness With Margaret Brennan.” (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Video: Blavatnik Agrees to Buy Warner Music for $8.25 a Share

May 6, 2011

May 6 (Bloomberg) — Warner Music Group former director Len Blavatnik has agreed to buy the record company in a transaction valued at about $3.3 billion. Blavatnik’s Access Industries Holdings will pay $8.25 a share, the companies said in a statement today. The sale of New York-based Warner comes after a three-month auction whose finalists included private-equity brothers Tom and Alex Gores and Sony/ATV Music Publishing. Bloomberg’s Cristina Alesci discusses the transaction on Bloomberg Television’s “InBusiness With Margaret Brennan.” (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Video: Blavatnik Agrees to Buy Warner Music for $8.25 a Share

May 6, 2011

May 6 (Bloomberg) — Warner Music Group former director Len Blavatnik has agreed to buy the record company in a transaction valued at about $3.3 billion. Blavatnik’s Access Industries Holdings will pay $8.25 a share, the companies said in a statement today. The sale of New York-based Warner comes after a three-month auction whose finalists included private-equity brothers Tom and Alex Gores and Sony/ATV Music Publishing. Bloomberg’s Cristina Alesci discusses the transaction on Bloomberg Television’s “InBusiness With Margaret Brennan.” (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Rep. Buck McKeon Tries To Raise Pentagon Engine Program From the Dead

May 6, 2011

By Colin Clark Editor, AOL Defense WASHINGTON — Rep. Buck McKeon (R-Calif.), chairman of the House Armed Services Committee, is likely to insert language into the defense policy bill that would allow General Electric and Rolls Royce to work on the technically de-funded alternate engine program for the Joint Strike Fighter plane. Current government regulations bar the two defense companies from working on the proposed F136 engines because they are now considered government property. Pratt & Whitney is the maker of the F135 engine, the engine program of record for the Joint Strike Fighter, or F-35. But in a speech at the conservative Heritage Foundation Thursday, McKeon announced that GE and Rolls would invest their own money to keep the program alive and provide “competition” to Pratt & Whitney. A GE source said the companies would provide between $100 million and $200 million for fiscal 2012. But the alternate engine program has required roughly $500 million per year until now, raising questions over whether it could survive solely on private funds from the two companies. And it remains unclear whether the Air Force would permit GE entry into and use of government facilities, especially those needed for testing the engine. But one observer with long experience in military acquisition said the companies’ involvement was a “great idea” that would help “keep Pratt honest.” The observer added that there were benefits to allowing a company develop a program without government funding. Since becoming HASC chairman, McKeon has consistently said that the Defense Department needs more money than it currently receives. But the odds of reviving the alternate engine program may be against him. On the right side of McKeon sits the Tea Party. It led the big defeat of McKeon and other second engine supporters in mid-February when the House voted 233-198 to kill the F136 engine. On the left side of McKeon sit a host of Democrats, some eager to trim the defense budget, some who support Pratt, and others who support the administration’s position that the second engine is unnecessary. Lexington Institute defense analyst and consultant Loren Thompson said he believes GE “is probably wasting money trying to keep its alternative going by spending company money.” He added, “GE desperately wants a berth in the future fighter-engine business, but it can’t keep pouring money into something the customer has rejected.” The Pentagon officially rejected the program on April 26.

Read the full article →

AlaskaDispatch.com: BP Has a Long History of Problems at Alaska’s Prudhoe Bay

May 4, 2011

On Tuesday, it was announced that BP would pay $25 million and spend another $60 million implementing a state-of-the-art monitoring system to guard against North Slope oil spills under a proposed settlement reached with the federal government over a 2006 spill. Since 2000, BP has been fined and criticized for cutting corners and not properly maintaining Prudhoe Bay. BP operates the Alaska oil field on behalf of itself, ConocoPhillips, Exxon Mobil Corp. and other companies. Here’s a timeline of BP’s issues at Prudhoe Bay: 2000: BP is placed on five years federal probation, stemming from an incident in which a contractor dumped thousands of gallons of toxic material underground at a BP oil field in Alaska during the 1990s. BP pleads guilty to a single felony in connection to the incident, admitting that it took too long to notify federal regulators about the dumping. It pays a $6.5 million fine and agrees to set up a nationwide environmental management program, which ultimately cost about $40 million. 2001: A work crew injects oil and fluids underground to dispose of them after a small spill. BP pays $675,000 in fines for not consulting with state environmental regulators before dumping the material. Spring 2001: Alaska regulators discover that safety valves atop of some Prudhoe oil wells, which shut down production if pressure drops because of a leak, have high failure rates, prompting regulators to step up inspections and call on BP to do a better job of inspecting wellheads. See the complete timeline from 2000-2011, including the most recent, record oil spill in Alaska’s oil patch, only at Alaska Dispatch .

Read the full article →

Gwen Ruta: Spreading Sustainability: From the Fortune 500 to the Next 5,000

April 28, 2011

Recently in Harvard Business Review , Michael Porter and Mark Kramer wrote about ” The Big Idea ” — that companies must take the lead by “creating economic value in a way that also creates value for society by addressing its needs and challenges.” Driven by win-win success stories, by a vacuum in policy leadership, and by the embrace of thought leaders like Porter, this idea has surged into the mainstream. Even in the grip of the recession, companies across the Fortune 500 – from Walmart (#1) and GE (#6) to Owens Corning (#431) and SunGard (#472) — are actively pursuing a sustainability agenda. But for the companies that make up mainstream corporate America, environmental issues may still largely be seen as a cost center rather than a competitive edge. What will it take to show these companies that environmental innovation can be an opportunity rather than a burden? How can we spread the principles of sustainability from the Fortune 500 to the next 5,000? Start with energy efficiency Every company uses energy, and can do so more efficiently. The consulting gurus at McKinsey & Company calculate that by deploying an array of NPV-positive efficiency measures, commercial and industrial users could generate $732 billion in energy savings by 2020 while avoiding some 660 million tons of annual greenhouse gas emissions. In other words, we can make a lot of money and cut a lot of emissions simultaneously by using proven technologies. But, it’s not quite as easy as it sounds. Companies fail to reap the benefits of energy efficiency for reasons that have nothing to do with what we learned in Econ 101. In the real world, managers are overburdened, useful information is hard to find, lease arrangements stand in the way of smart investments, and competition for corporate dollars is sharp. Sometimes it takes “fresh eyes” to overcome the barriers to change. Our EDF Climate Corps program uses business students to find energy savings opportunities at participating companies. In just 10 weeks at 50 companies last summer, we found $350 million in potential operating savings. And that’s just the tip of the iceberg. Stimulate innovation Environmental goals, combined with open networking, can be a great way to stimulate innovation that can lead to new products and greater market share. The impetus can come from the top, because when executives set rigorous goals and metrics for measuring them, they unleash innovation throughout the company. GE’s Ecomagination program, which generated $18 billion in revenue on $1.5 billion in investments, is a good example of this approach. Innovation can also come from the bottom up, as illustrated by Toyota’s ” Treasure Hunt ” process, which uses operators, engineers and maintenance staff to find process innovations and energy savings. And innovation can come from the outside. Breakthrough ideas can — and often do — emerge from bringing a new and diverse perspective to a familiar problem. Environmental Defense Fund recently teamed up with InnoCentive , a global leader in crowdsourced innovation, to work with companies to create business breakthroughs that deliver environmental results. InnoCentive’s web-based platform gives over 250,000 entrepreneurs, inventors and scientists around the world the chance to solve them. With the likes of Eli Lilly, NASA, and Procter & Gamble using the platform, it’s redefining the innovation process. Capture operational excellence For most companies, including those that provide business capital, environmental issues are still thought of as a liability rather than an opportunity. To build value, firms must think beyond compliance. Smart companies are positioning themselves to compete in a resource-constrained world, where efficiency and innovation trump risk management. Working with private equity giants The Carlyle Group and Kohlberg, Kravis, Roberts & Co. , EDF has developed tools that are available to any company for systematically identifying opportunity and measuring improvements in environmental and business performance. In just two years, those tools generated $160 million in operating savings for companies including Dollar General and US Foodservice. Drive supply chain improvement Companies will want to focus first on their own operations, but for many small and medium-sized businesses, their biggest impacts lie not within their own fencelines, but in the lifecycle of the products they buy and sell. And while smaller companies may not feel that they have the clout to create supply chain mandates, they do have ability to ask pointed questions and shop around for the best prices. Why should your company be paying for the extra energy or water or wasted raw materials embedded in products made by another company that has not yet embraced sustainability? There are several good examples to work from. Walmart’s Supplier Sustainability Assessment questions are simple, straight-forward and a good place to start. Procter & Gamble has a similar supplier scorecard designed to track and encourage improvement on key environmental sustainability measures in P&G’s supply chain. The company reports that about 40 percent of the completed scorecards it receives have offered at least one innovation idea. Today, we are all feeling the stress of a pinched economy, resource constraints, volatile fuel prices and global competition. At the same time, we’re seeing examples every day of companies that have successfully turned environmental sustainability into competitive advantage. By building capturing energy and operational efficiencies, stimulating innovation through aggressive goals and creative networking, and driving lifecycle change through the supply chain, we can bring Porter’s big idea to life. This content was originally published on Green to Gold’s BRASS TACKS blog .

Read the full article →

Michael Tasner: Seven Free Marketing Tactics to Grow Your Small Business

April 27, 2011

Most people think that marketing “has to cost money” in order to be effective. This article proves otherwise. These seven tactics have all been time tested and proven to work time and time again. #1 Your Business Card What does your business card say about you or your company? Is it on cheap card stock? Is there a message on the back? Is there a clear call to action? 95% of the business cards I have seen are ineffective. Did you know that business cards are among the few things that people actually hold on to when given? In Japan, for example, they are coveted. Make your card stand out and load it up with information. If this one item was the only thing a potential customer had, would it move the needle forward towards a sale or farther away? #2 Free Public Talks Speaking, in general, is a great way to build your status, but is also a great way to attract clients. Simply go to Google, type in your industry and then the phrase: “event”, or “conference”, or “expo,” and you will start to find lists of all of the different events. Browse the pages and look for the page that allows you to apply to be a speaker at that event. Another great way to find events is to join a few of the Chamber of Commerce’s and find out where the different local events that are coming up are being held. If there is nothing coming up in your industry, start something locally and pave the way. #3 Mining Your Email List Believe it or not, email marketing is still going strong (and actually increasing) as people continue to read their emails on their smart phones. In the next 24 hours, mine your list. Remove the bounces and the bad emails. Send out an email asking people to “re-opt-in” if they are truly interested in what you have to say; if not, goodbye. The only people you should keep on your email list are people that really want to hear what you have to say. Mine your list one to two times a year like clockwork. Don’t be afraid if the number goes down. #4 The Way You Answer the Phone I understand that this sounds simple, but the way you answer the phone can make or break a sale. A simple hello just isn’t going to cut it. Answering after six rings and then putting someone on hold will also not cut it. Why not answer on the first ring with something like: “Hey there, I hope you’re having a great day, this is Michael, how can I help you accomplish your dreams today?” #5 Your Follow Up How do you follow up with a potential customer? An even better question is, how quickly do you follow up? You should respond to all requests within 24 business hours (if not sooner). If there is someone who wants a quote, or to chat, make sure to get back to them ASAP. After you have spoken, follow up at least four times, in four different fashions: an email, a physical letter, a phone call, and some type of lumpy mail. One of my favorite lumpy mail techniques is using SendaBall.com . I send a ball after I talk with every prospect saying “I had a ball chatting with them.” #6 Blogging Blogging is back baby. Well, blogging really never went away. Now more than ever, consumers are looking to put a face to the companies they frequent, or are thinking of frequenting. Blogging is a great way to build rapport with your customers and your potential customers. Blog often and blog about topics that would be deemed useful to your audience. Yes, some personal blogs here and there are great as well, but keep it more informational than anything. Check out the blog at Keg Works for a great benchmark. #7 Writing a Book A book is among the best business cards you’ve ever had. A book helps take your brand or your companies brand up 10 notches the minute it comes out. Don’t think you could write a book? Hire a ghost writer. Don’t think there’s a potential topic for the space you’re in? Try me, and check out these examples: ● Lingerie store: How looking sexy can make you feel better and improve your marriage. ● Video Rentals: The top videos that improve mankind. ● Garage sales: How to spot a bargain at a garage sale and re-sell it for a hefty profit. ● Tree Climber: Crazy stories from a tree climber who has seen it all. While eBooks are great, I still recommend having at least a hundred or so copies printed (check out print on demand by companies like amazon or lulu.com ) Physical books command more attention and respect. There you have it, seven tactics that cost you nothing more than your time. Pick one and implement it in the next 30 days.

Read the full article →

Nintendo May Seek Outside Help

April 26, 2011

(TOKYO) – Nintendo said on Tuesday that alliances with other companies may be necessary, a day after the game maker reported its second straight fall in annual profit and said it would launch a successor to its aging Wii console. “I now regret that we didn’t tie up with someone outside the company to market the Wii. If we had done that, the fate of the Wii might have been different,” Chief Executive Satoru Iwata said at a conference for investors and analysts. “Now I am aware that we should not rely too much on ourselves. You will see what I mean by this when we market the 3DS and the Wii in the future.” (Reporting by Junko Fujita; Editing by Michael Watson) Copyright 2011 Thomson Reuters. Click for Restrictions

Read the full article →

Mutual Fund Teaches Grad Students Real World Investing

April 22, 2011

NEW ORLEANS — With all of the ups and downs of the stock markets over the past decade, the average investor might wonder who’s watching over his mutual funds. In the case of the Burkenroad Fund, it’s a group of students at Tulane University’s Freeman School of Business who spend hours combing through the financial reports of companies that a lot of retail investors haven’t heard of and analysts don’t follow – and eventually find many of the stocks the fund buys. The results over a decade of student involvement aren’t anything to sneeze at. According to Burkenroad’s prospectus, the no-load version of the fund, which started Dec. 31, 2001, had returned 11.9 percent since inception through March 31, 2011. The fund, managed by Biloxi, Miss.-based banker Hancock Holding Co., has current assets of about $70 million. The fund licenses its name from the university, but is managed independently from the school. The Russell 2000 index, a benchmark barometer of small- and mid-cap companies, returned an overall 7.5 percent over the same time. In the recessionary year of 2008, when many 401(k) plans lost much of their value, the Burkenroad fund suffered a loss of just under 25 percent compared to 33.8 percent for the Russell 2000 index. But both rebounded the following year. And for the three years ending March 31, the Burkenroad fund returned 10.72 percent compared to 8.6 percent for the Russell 2000 index. Peter Ricchiuti, who teaches the stock analysis course, said he picks most of the companies, and students come up with others. He said the Burkenroad fund’s reliance on student reports is unique, although other business schools put their students to the task of researching investments for university endowments. About 200 students over the current school year have been evaluating 40 companies across the South. Considering the region, it’s not surprising that 15 of the companies have some sort of involvement in the petroleum industry. The others include regional banks, as well as insurance, consumer goods, chicken- and egg- processing and retail companies. All of their final analyses – known as Burkenroad Reports – are available to the public. “At the Freeman school, we do our due diligence and take a more long-term look at investing,” said Anthony Elia, a 25-year-old graduate student in finance from Pasadena, Calif. The companies are generally in the $100 million to $1.5 billion market cap range and located in Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, Georgia, or Florida. The group looks for profitable companies – and those that don’t have many financial analysts following them. “One of the things is that we can clearly understand what they do,” Ricchiuti said. “No wild high-tech companies. Just meat-and-potato companies.” Elia first reported on oilfield services company Key Energy Inc. and now heads a team of students studying Carbo Ceramics Inc., an oilfield services company, and consumer services specialist Rollins Inc. Alexandra Thurber, a graduate student from Bethesda, Md., first reported on oilfield service company Willbros Group Inc. and now is team leader of a group analyzing egg producer Cal-Maine Foods Inc. and Pool Corp., which provides swimming pool products. She’s not sure yet whether she’ll be doing the same task for a living. “My background is in math and this is an extension of that,” Thurber, 25, said. “The dynamic nature of the markets is interesting. I think I will wind up working in a financial career, but not necessarily investing.” In keeping with standard investment house rules, the students are forbidden from investing personally in companies they have researched. They can buy the Burkenroad Fund. These students, from their perspective in life, have grown up around a lot of cynicism concerning investing – the dot-com bust, the scandals of Enron and Tyco International and, last but not least, the collapse of Lehman Brothers and the ensuing retirement savings wipeout of the 2008 financial collapse. “There’s always been some cynicism,” said Arnaba Dasqupta, a 29-year-old graduate student with a previous job at a New York hedge firm and who is now hoping for a banking career. “It doesn’t have to come from a corporate scandal. It can be management being too optimistic. It’s not lying, but it’s misleading to investors.” What would the student stock-pickers tell a potential investor? “I suggest you find a company whose products and values you like and stick with it,” said Tray McCurdy, a 24-year-old graduate student in finance from Baltimore. Elia is against momentum investing – or “jumping on the bandwagon.” “Invest in companies you know and understand,” said Dori Brown, a 21-year-old undergraduate student from Houston. “Don’t focus on one aspect of a company,” Thurber said. “Look at the entire picture and not just one thing that excites you.” Arnab said that if an investor is not confident of his knowledge, he should seek an adviser who can be trusted. “Do your own homework,” he said. “Investing is a system with a lot of people with a lot of different opinions. The markets owe you nothing.”

Read the full article →

Travelers Companies Results…

April 21, 2011

Travelers Companies Results…

Read the full article →

Supreme Court Casts Doubt On States’ Global Warming Suit

April 19, 2011

WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court appeared deeply skeptical Tuesday about allowing states to sue electric utilities to force cuts in greenhouse gas emissions from power plants. Both conservative and liberal justices questioned whether a federal judge could deal with the complex issue of global warming, a topic they suggested is better left to Congress and the Environmental Protection Agency. The court heard argument over whether to end the lawsuit by six states, New York City and three conservation groups against four private companies and the federal Tennessee Valley Authority, the five largest emitters of carbon dioxide in the United States. The Obama administration has joined with the companies in asking the high court to throw out the lawsuit. The administration says EPA already is considering setting emission standards that would accomplish what the states are seeking. Why let the lawsuit go forward, when “the agency is engaged in it right now?” said Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg. The lawyer representing the states acknowledged that the case was before the high court at a “peculiar moment,” but said the court should block the lawsuit only if the EPA actually issues regulations. In Congress, Republicans are leading an effort to strip EPA of the authority to regulate greenhouse gases, but that was not discussed at the court Tuesday. No statute or rule “currently regulates the emissions of existing power plants,” said Barbara Underwood, the New York solicitor general. Underwood said the plants operated by the companies and the TVA account for 10 percent of all carbon dioxide emitted annually in the U.S. “This court should not close the courthouse door at the outset,” Underwood said. Lawyers for the companies and the administration focused on the enormity of the climate change issue to argue against the lawsuit. “You have never heard a case like this before,” Neal Katyal, the acting U.S. Solicitor General, said. The term global warming, Katyal said, “tells you all you need to know.” The case is the second climate change dispute at the court in four years. In 2007, the court declared that carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases are air pollutants under the Clean Air Act. By a 5-4 vote, the justices said the EPA has the authority to regulate those emissions from new cars and trucks under that landmark law. The same reasoning applies to power plants. Ginsburg was among the justices in the majority in 2007. Two others in that majority, Justices Stephen Breyer and Anthony Kennedy, also expressed doubts about the states’ case Tuesday. Breyer questioned whether a judge even would have the authority to issue the kind of order the states want. Until now, pollution cases in the federal courts typically have involved a power plant or sewage treatment plant that was causing some identifiable harm to people, and property downwind or downstream of the polluting plant. Peter Keisler, representing the companies, said global warming suggests a more complex problem in need of a comprehensive solution that includes an evaluation of the “way we use and pay for energy.” Courts are ill-equipped to make that determination, Keisler said. The private defendants in the suit are American Electric Power Co. of Ohio, Cinergy Co., now part of Duke Energy Corp. of North Carolina; Southern Co. Inc. of Georgia, and Xcel Energy Inc. of Minnesota. Eight states initially banded together to sue. They were California, Connecticut, Iowa, New Jersey, New York, Rhode Island, Vermont and Wisconsin. New Jersey and Wisconsin withdrew this year after Republicans replaced Democrats in their governor’s offices. Justice Sonia Sotomayor, who was on the federal appeals court panel that heard the case, is not taking part in the Supreme Court’s consideration of the issue. A decision is expected by late June. The case is American Electric Power Co. v. Connecticut, 10-174.

Read the full article →

Ed Lawler: Sustainable Leadership: The Problem With Iconic Leaders

April 18, 2011

For the last several months CEO succession at Apple has gotten a considerable amount of attention because of Steve Jobs’ health problems. The corporate board has been asked what their succession plan is for the CEO role and so far, they have avoided giving a definitive answer. It’s no wonder that investors are concerned. There are many examples in the history of American business that demonstrate how hard it is to replace an iconic leader. GE has not done well since Jack Welch left. Polaroid went bankrupt a few years after its founder Edwin Land retired. Disney floundered for a number of years after Walt Disney retired. The most common reason given for the failure to find replacements for iconic leaders is poor leadership development on the part of their companies. But there is much more to the problem of succession in icon-led companies than simply the lack of talent development and of the succession planning. Iconic leaders such as Welch and Disney often spend decades in their CEO roles and exert enormous influence through all aspects of their company’s strategy, operations and design. They create leadership roles that fit them. They institutionalize their way of managing to such an extent that their replacements simply have to do the job the way they did it or make enormous changes in the way senior management operates. Of course, it is virtually impossible to find a leader who can replace icons such as Welch and Disney in the jobs they have created, no matter how good the internal development system of a company is. But in essence, these icons create unsustainable leadership roles in their companies. What’s the antidote to this? There is an alternative to the kind of iconic leader who is impossible to replace: have a senior leader who installs a sustainable leadership model. This of course raises the question: What is a sustainable leadership model? Perhaps, the best way to describe it is as a shared leadership approach, one where individuals throughout the organization are expected to demonstrate leadership behavior and not be overly dependent on the CEO to provide a sense of direction, mission and purpose for the organization. When leadership is shared, people throughout the organization take advantage of leadership moments to influence the direction of the corporation. Finding a new CEO is much easier with the shared leadership approach. Bill Gates did it at Microsoft and the pay-off as been continued high performance. Herb Kelleher did it at Southwest Airlines and it has continued to perform well. The implication of this for boards is clear; they need to focus on talent development and how their firm is led, not just on succession planning. But what about Apple? Is Steve Jobs more like Bill Gates and Herb Kelleher or more like Jack Welch and Walt Disney? Is he a leader that has created a sustainable leadership approach for Apple? It does not look like it to me, but only time will tell. Edward E. Lawler III is a distinguished professor of business at the University of Southern California (USC) Marshall School of Business and founder/director of the University’s Center for Effective Organizations (CEO), one of the country’s leading management research organizations. He’s authored more than 40 books, including his most recent — Management Reset: Organizing for Sustainable Effectiveness (Jossey-Bass, March 2011). Cross-posted from Forbes.com .

Read the full article →

Drugmakers Suffer Declining Profits Due To Generic Competition

April 17, 2011

Pfizer Inc. (PFE) and rival U.S. drugmakers are poised to report the industry’s biggest drop in quarterly profit in more than four years as the companies cope with record patent losses in 2011.

Read the full article →

Kirk Dunn Joins Cloudera Executive Staff as Chief Operating Officer

April 8, 2011

Brings Extensive Hands-On Experience Running Successful Venture-Backed Companies

Read the full article →

Joe Keefe: Saying "No" to All-Male Corporate Boards

April 6, 2011

Each year, we hear the latest, discouraging figures on the glacial progress women have made in cracking the male-dominated board rooms of corporate America. According to a recent Catalyst study, women hold only 3 percent of the CEO positions and 15 percent of the board positions among Fortune 500 companies. It is time to ask why progress has been so slow and what can be done differently to accelerate it. This failure is not due to lack of effort. Many well-motivated individuals and organizations have worked for years to alter this state of affairs, deploying a range of strategies aimed at encouraging companies to embrace gender diversity on their boards. There is also considerable evidence that the paucity of women on corporate boards and management teams is costing us, as numerous studies underscore the nexus between greater board and management diversity, on the one hand, and improved corporate governance and financial performance, on the other. When women are at the table, the discussion is richer, the decision-making process is better, management is more innovative and collaborative, and the organization is stronger. This is particularly the case with a critical mass of women in leadership roles. Moreover, the persistence of male-dominated boardrooms takes place against a backdrop of abysmal failures in corporate governance. The recent financial crisis is only the latest reminder that many boards of directors are simply not doing their job. And if this is true, then the old canard that “there aren’t enough qualified women” to fill more board seats can be turned on its head: After all, the (mostly) men who led so many of our largest financial institutions to ruin turn out not to have been very “qualified” either. But there is one indisputable fact about non-diverse boards that we never seem to acknowledge, perhaps because the truth hurts: we elect them. That’s right, even those of us who think that gender discrimination is wrong, and that women should be better represented in corporate board rooms — we elect these non-diverse boards, often unwittingly, year after year. How is that? Well, all publicly traded corporations send out a proxy ballot to their shareholders in advance of their annual general meeting, with a list of director nominees to serve on the company’s board. The shareholders — or at least those who vote — then ordinarily rubber stamp this list of director nominees, which means, in most cases, either no women or a slate of nominees where women are grossly underrepresented. Why do we rubber stamp all-male boards while we profess to believe that more diverse boards are needed? Because we either don’t vote our proxies at all or we assign them to someone else who votes them for us, sometimes contrary to our values and our interests. If we own stock directly, many of us simply throw away the proxy ballot when it arrives in the mail. If we invest in stocks or mutual funds through a broker or investment adviser, or invest in a 401(k) or 403(b) plan at work, or in an IRA, we generally assign responsibility for voting our proxies to an agent. In either case, we are these companies’ shareholders, and if we believe there needs to be greater gender diversity on corporate boards, then we need to start taking rather than abdicating responsibility. We need to become part of the solution rather than part of the problem. There is a simple way to do this. We can withhold support for all-male director slates, or instruct whoever is voting our proxies to withhold such support. If enough investors ask this of their investment advisers, or their retirement plan administrators at work, or their mutual fund managers, then we can begin to make a difference. In fact, if we each wrote a letter to the companies, and enclosed it with our proxy ballot, letting them know why we are saying “no” to their board, the companies we own would begin to get the picture. Companies will respond to investor pressure. They will listen to their shareholders if enough of us are willing to raise our voices. When it comes to increasing gender diversity on America’s corporate boards, the business case is clear. Companies — and their shareholders — will actually be better off. Let your voice be heard. Take the time to vote your proxies for greater gender equality. Jacki Zehner was the youngest woman, and first female trader, to be become a partner at Goldman Sachs and is Co-Chair of Women Moving Millions. Joe Keefe is the President and CEO of Pax World Funds.

Read the full article →

Cuba To Drill For Oil In Gulf

April 5, 2011

HAVANA — Cuba and partner companies will begin drilling five oil wells in the Gulf of Mexico this summer in hopes of locating enough crude to justify the costly exploration, an official said Tuesday. “The prospects are very promising” of finding valuable reserves, said Manuel Marrero, an official with the Ministry of Basic Industry. Cuba’s domestic production is exclusively heavy oil with a high sulfur content. Its offshore Gulf waters could contain large quantities of lighter, sweet crude, although a test well in 2004 turned up only modest deposits. Studies since then have pointed to “oil traps” in the marine floor, persuading partner companies to take on the expensive task of exploration in deep water, Marrero said during an earth sciences convention. The drilling is expected to run through 2013. The Cuban government has designated 59 blocks in Gulf waters encompassing 43,200 square miles (112,000 square kilometers) where private energy companies have said they could drill deep-water test wells. The area opened for international investment in 2000, and currently a half-dozen companies, including Spain’s Repsol-YPF, have contracted for 22 of the blocks. None of the companies are American – due to Washington’s decades-old ban of U.S. business dealings with the communist-governed island – although some U.S. firms have expressed interest in the past. Marrero repeated Cuba’s position that it would be open to partnering with U.S. companies. “Any company could participate under Cuban laws,” Marrero said. Earlier this year, Brazilian officials announced that country’s state-run energy giant, Petrobras, would withdraw from the Cuban area. “They had a small block, barely 1,500 square kilometers,” Marrero said. “They discovered prospects, but that can’t compete with the hundreds of prospects they have” in Brazilian territory. According to geologic studies conducted by several institutions, some of them U.S.-based, Cuba’s Gulf reserves could be 5 billion to 9 billion barrels of crude. Nearly a year after the Deepwater Horizon disaster that killed 11 workers and led to more than 200 million gallons of oil spewing from a BP well a mile beneath the Gulf of Mexico, Marrero assured reporters that Cuba’s exploration will be carried out safely. “The equipment that will be used is the most modern, the safest. The regulatory framework is very strict, and the companies that will drill are prestigious and experienced,” he said. “I don’t think we are going to have any more risks.” Earlier this year, Cuba reported its 2010 production totaled 4 million tons of petroleum equivalent – oil plus natural gas – or about 46 percent of its domestic consumption. The rest it obtains from Venezuela on preferential terms.

Read the full article →

Dave Lerner: Interview With NYC Startup STELLAService Co-Founder Jordy Leiser

April 5, 2011

Welcome to this week’s conversation with Jordy Leiser , CEO of STELLAService , one of the most intriguing and sought-after venture-backed startups in NYC. STELLAService rates the customer service performance of online stores and was recently featured in AdAge ( here ) and on TechCrunch ( here ). Jordy Leiser – CEO of Stella Service from Venture Studio on Vimeo . Below is a short table of contents (with corresponding minutes) of our conversation: 00:27 Jordy’s background & how it led to the founding of STELLAService 01:30 Who invested, how the deal came together 02:50 Who is this new player in town, Consiglieri ? 4:39 The size of their angel and venture rounds 05:25 Who’s the team behind STELLAService? 06:30 Why’d they choose to set-up shop in NYC? 07:15 How a high school internship framed Jordy’s perception of branding 07:34 Jordy’s previous work with IMG and his experience in sports licensing 08:12 The business model 09:45 The STELLAService Seal and what it means for a company to carry it 10:25 Who are some of the companies displaying the seal? 12:02 How are brands picked and evaluated? 13:25 What’s the company doing with all the data it’s accumulating? 14:13 How many brands are displaying the seal? 16:00 What’s Jordy learning about running a company? 16:30 What’s currently happening at STELLAService? 17:08 Are they hiring? This post originally appeared on www.davidblerner.com

Read the full article →

Wall Street May Allow Shareholders To Vote On Executive Pay

April 1, 2011

Morgan Stanley, Goldman Sachs and JPMorgan Chase & Co will soon join Citigroup and Bank of America Corp in allowing shareholders to vote on executive compensation, the Wall Street Journal said, citing people familiar with the matter. Last year’s Dodd-Frank financial reform law requires a say-on-pay vote at least three years at most big U.S. companies. Other companies that already have recommended shareholders’ vote on the executive pay are Monsanto Co, Tyco International, Toll Brothers Inc, the newspaper said. Morgan Stanley, Goldman Sachs and JPMorgan are expected to recommend an annual vote in their coming filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, WSJ said, citing people familiar with the matter. The banks were not immediately available for comment. (Reporting by Megha Mandavia; Editing by Jon Loades-Carter) Copyright 2011 Thomson Reuters. Click for Restrictions .

Read the full article →

Nasdaq Makes Huge Rival Bid To Buy NYSE

April 1, 2011

Nasdaq OMX and IntercontinentalExchange unveiled a rival bid to buy NYSE Euronext for about $11.3 billion in cash and stock, a 19 percent premium to an offer made by German competitor Deutsche Boerse. The move, announced on Friday, represents an intense bidding war for NYSE Euronext, whose derivatives trading operations are highly valuable. The new bid could also sit better politically, because the idea of a German company taking over the emblematic NYSE headquarters had stirred some political opposition in the United States. The offer is valued at $42.50 per share, a premium of 19 percent to the agreement proposed by Deutsche Boerse in February, the companies said in the statement. Shares of NYSE Euronext were up 11.6 percent at $39.26 in trading before the market opened. (Reporting by Supantha Mukherjee in Bangalore and Lauren Tara LaCapra in New York; Editing by Unnikrishnan Nair and Lisa Von Ahn) Copyright 2011 Thomson Reuters. Click for Restrictions .

Read the full article →

Video: Nasdaq OMX, ICE Offer to Buy NYSE for $11.3 Billion

April 1, 2011

April 1 (Bloomberg) — Nasdaq OMX Group Inc. and IntercontinentalExchange Inc. offered to buy NYSE Euronext for about $11.3 billion as the companies teamed up in an attempt to snatch the New York Stock Exchange from Deutsche Boerse AG. The companies offered $42.50 in cash and stock for each NYSE Euronext share, according to a statement released today. Bloomberg’s Erik Schatzker and Scarlet Fu report. (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Davie Yards Enters Into an Exclusivity Agreement With Fincantieri and DRS Technologies Canada

March 31, 2011

LÉVIS, QUÉBEC–(Marketwire – March 31, 2011) – Davie Yards (“Davie” or the “Corporation”) announced today that it has entered into an exclusivity agreement with Fincantieri – Cantieri Navali Italiani (“Fincantieri”) and DRS Technologies Canada (“DRS”), a Finmeccanica company, to negotiate the potential acquisition of the shipyard by an entity that will be majority-owned by Fincantieri. In order to continue this process, Davie has obtained an order from the Québec Superior Court (the “Court”) extending the stay of proceedings ordered by the Court to May 19, 2011, the whole pursuant to the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (“CCAA”).

Read the full article →

NFL Great Tim Brown Joins Halo Companies, Inc. Advisory Board

March 29, 2011

ALLEN, TX–(Marketwire – March 29, 2011) – Halo Companies, Inc. ( OTCQB : HALN ) ( PINKSHEETS : HALN ) today announced that famed football superstar, Heisman trophy winner, and two-time nominee to the Pro Football Hall of Fame, Tim Brown has joined the Halo Companies Advisory Board.

Read the full article →

Margaret Heffernan: GE: Forget CSR, Pay Your Taxes

March 28, 2011

Rejecting the gloom and that which so many corporate antics inspire, business writers of late have taken to praising the companies that pursue purpose, articulate values and see for themselves higher values than just boosting the bottom line. And we admire those who embrace corporate social responsibility (CSR) and attempt to give something back to their communities through volunteering and charitable donations. I’m all for this — though there will always be a part of me that still wonders that we celebrate those who simply try not to be evil. But it seems to me that before we start celebrating all these added extras, we should require of our corporations that they do one basic thing: they should pay their taxes. This seems obvious to most of us. But it isn’t obvious to everyone. GE is not alone in making no tax contribution to the American economy. I have worked with several companies now whose stated aim (at least within their treasury departments) is a $0 tax return. And when the creative bean counters achieve this, there are slaps on the back all round and big bonuses. In the UK, there’s now a movement to identify and shame companies that pay no UK tax. Some leading retailers, like the popular Top Shop and Fortnum & Mason, have been the target of mass consumer protests; in other instances, shoppers have simply demanded that since the company doesn’t pay tax, they shouldn’t have to either. Kraft’s decision to move some of its operations to Switzerland to avoid tax, Merrill Lynch’s move to Monaco , Barclay’s sacking of a whistleblower unhappy with the bank’s tax policy: these are all corporations using ‘shareholder value’ as the excuse for refusing to contribute real value to society. The implication of these policies is that the businesses themselves have no role and no connection to society. This is dangerous stuff. No business is an island; every company depends on society for it to function. Every business has a deep, vested interest in a community that is legal, decent, honest, peaceful, healthy and educated. Without that, it has no employees, no customers — and no need of lofty, higher purposes. If businesses believe they can separate themselves from society, they invite the response that we are beginning to see on UK streets: a profound hatred of business, and a belief that unless you are a social enterprise, you must be an anti-social corporation. If this trend is allowed to continue, no amount of CSR or citizenship websites will restore faith in business. GE prides itself on making a difference “ethical actions, beyond formal requirements” and that’s nice. But I’d prefer to see it pay its taxes. For the rest of us, that is a formal requirement. Only, apparently, for large corporations is it an optional extra.

Read the full article →

Scott Nova: Outsourcing Tragedy: On the 100th Anniversary of Triangle Shirtwaist, Workers Are Still Dying in Garment Factory Fires

March 25, 2011

One hundred years ago today, a fire broke out at the Triangle Shirtwaist factory in lower Manhattan. After locked doors made flight impossible, many workers leapt to their deaths to escape the flames. One hundred and forty-six people died, in a tragedy that helped catalyze a national movement for workplace reform. Unfortunately, we do not need to look back a hundred years to contemplate the horror of garment workers falling from the high floors of a burning factory. The last such nightmare befell workers barely 100 days ago , on December 14, when thirty workers were killed and more than a hundred injured at a factory producing for Kohl’s, JC Penney, Target, Wrangler, Phillips-Van Heusen, Oshkosh, Gap and others. The sad irony on this centennial of the Triangle tragedy is that the abusive conditions, poverty wages and shoddy garment industry safety practices that unions and social reformers decried in 1911 have not been eliminated. They have been outsourced. Faced with rising wages, strong unions and enforceable safety regulations in the United States, clothing brands and retailers have moved virtually all of their production overseas. Today, America’s dresses, jeans and t-shirts are produced in the contract factories of the developing world, where lax regulation, microscopic wages, and the near total absence of unions and collective bargaining ensure the cheap and flexible production the industry craves. The similarities between the fire at Triangle Shirtwaist and the recent disaster are eerie and instructive. As at Triangle, the December fire at That’s It Sportswear, a large garment production facility in Bangladesh, swept rapidly through the ninth floor of the building. Survivors reported that locked doors impeded workers’ escape. Many had no choice but to try to climb down ropes made of pieces of clothing hastily tied together. Some fell from the makeshift ropes; others, unable to reach the ropes, jumped to their demise. This conflagration was only the most recent in a long series of mass fatalities in Bangladesh’s burgeoning apparel sector. Nine months earlier, another contract factory, this one making clothes for H&M, caught fire . Twenty-one workers died, their exit reportedly blocked by padlocked doors. It is no mystery why companies have been flocking to Bangladesh, which is now the world’s fourth largest garment exporter. The apparel manufacturers of 1911 Manhattan did not waste time and money on niceties like workplace safety or tolerate the inconvenience of labor unions and neither do their modern day counterparts in Bangladesh. The country’s weak safety protections are part of a rock-bottom cost structure that features wages of 20 cents an hour and implacable hostility to unions. Brands and retailers have paid lip service to the need for reform in Bangladesh’s factories, especially since a building collapse in 2005 that killed 64 workers, but the disasters keep happening and the orders for cheap clothes keep pouring in. Walmart alone now buys more than $1 billion worth of garments a year from Bangladesh. This is the contradiction at the heart of the contemporary apparel industry: the brands and retailers say they want to eliminate sweatshop conditions, but demand prices from their contractors so low that the only way they can stay in business is to keep abusing their workers. When the Bangladeshi labor movement called last year for a minimum wage of 35 cents an hour, the factory owners insisted, plausibly, that the brands and retailers would never accept the resulting price increases. Factory owners in Cambodia, where 200,000 workers recently struck for a minimum wage of 40 cents an hour, made the same claim, as have factory owners in India, another country where garment workers have died in multiple factory fires over the last year. Apparel brands now even complain that China is too expensive. Global outsourcing has enabled apparel companies to escape the regulatory strictures imposed though half a century of labor reform in the US. At the same time, the companies have largely succeeded in evading moral accountability for the abuses committed by their overseas factories, even as they benefit from the low prices those factories provide. Protecting workers requires new mechanisms for holding corporations accountable. One hopeful sign has been efforts of universities, spurred by student activists, to impose labor rights standards on their apparel industry partners: makers of university logo sweatshirts and t-shirts, like those selling briskly thanks to”March Madness.” Students and universities have achieved remarkable labor rights breakthroughs involving workers producing overseas for Nike and Russell Athletic and have also helped facilitate the opening of a model garment factory in the Dominican Republic where workers have a living wage and union representation. Meanwhile, labor rights organizations have called on the companies that do business with That’s It Sportswear to accept an aggressive and independent fire safety inspection program at hundreds of their supplier factories in Bangladesh. Many of the companies have promised to do so; time will tell if they fulfill that pledge. Broader accountability efforts along these lines are essential to achieving a new round of apparel industry reform that can finally protect the people who make our clothes from workplace horrors that should have been stamped out a century ago. Scott Nova is Executive Director of the Worker Rights Consortium, a labor rights watchdog, with over 175 affiliated universities and colleges.

Read the full article →

Nick Seguin: Kauffman’s Guide To Navigating The Startup Game

March 23, 2011

Starting a company, like capitalism, is messy . If there were a known formula for success, there would be far more startups and far more successful large businesses. Anecdotal evidence and case studies based on past successes do little to illustrate important decisions and the real process of business building. Rose-colored glasses tend to be the eyewear of choice for entrepreneurs looking back on how they won in startup game. At Kauffman, we are examining the “science of startups”: the decisions and best practices that are most common to successful, scalable firms. Now, more than ever, we need entrepreneurs and their firms to succeed because young firms create jobs and drive economic growth . And they tend to be the ones that bring products, services and processes to people at massive scale, generating substantial social benefit and often improving and saving lives. So how does one go about navigating the various ways to spend time, money and energy on an idea in order to create an immediate positive impact and long-term value? Resources have exploded onto the scene as of late, creating a veritable industry around entrepreneurship. The exact combination and sequence of resources that make up a successful startup are not yet well known, but the following are a few tips that many entrepreneurs have followed. Not to state the obvious, but human capital is critical. Most ideas are commodities. What really matters are the people who build businesses around ideas. Whether through unstructured peer-communities or focused mentorship, human capital consolidation and curation is a fundamental investment founders need to make when launching and growing their companies. Human capital creation occurs in formal and informal communities that exist online and offline. Examples include Entrepreneurs’ Organization (EO) , Hackers & Founders and simple meetups. Likewise, people might be accessed and employed through structured programs such as accelerators, like TechStars and YCombinator , which facilitate direct mentorship. Considerations of a startup’s life-cycle phase and specific needs dictate the appropriate engagements here. Discussions about financial capital always require considerations of industry and phase. For instance, life sciences and advanced materials have their own realities; capital here looks more like $50 million tranches. Equity financing has consequences that founders must be aware of. Strategic capital, when it is needed, can be the right decision and building a war chest isn’t a bad thing. But it is important to be aware of different types of investors, their motivations and their fiduciary responsibilities (if any). When considering and pursuing capital, founders can access helpful content and tools on Venture Hacks , AngelList , Own Your Venture and the Kauffman Foundation’s own Entrepreneurship.org . Iteration is a concept that expands beyond product development. It applies to many facets of a company, including idea discovery, business model search , the team, customer development and even to the personal exploration of becoming a founder. Finding mechanisms, methodologies and opportunities to iterate is important. But you can’t iterate until you’ve done something. That’s the first step. Committing to iteration means there is a line in the sand, and this is the most difficult step for many entrepreneurs. Iteration allows for progress on something tangible as opposed to postulation. Look for opportunities to iterate through simulations and events like Startup Weekend , pitch competitions, accelerators, and most important, your own company. Entrepreneurship is the phenomenon that allows individuals to bring innovations to society, create wealth and realize economic independence. Founders and potential founders have more resources available than ever before as they make their journey toward these outcomes. While the active and messy life-cycle of company building is far from being boiled “down to a science,” entrepreneurs will be a step ahead if they focus on people, strategic financing and iteration.

Read the full article →

SEC After Freddie, Fannie Mae Executives

March 18, 2011

The Securities and Exchange Commission is moving toward charging former and current Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac executives with violations related to the financial crisis, setting up a clash with the housing regulator that oversees the companies, according to sources familiar with the matter.

Read the full article →

Jamie Court: Speculators & Oil Companies Are to Blame for Gas Prices, Not the Middle East

March 8, 2011

While skirmishes in Libya and uncertainty in the Middle East are nice cover for outrageous gasoline prices, the fact is the same old suspects are making a killing from sky-high gas prices approaching $4 dollars per gallon in California: big oil companies and greedy speculators. The speculative market may have driven crude oil prices up, but that's not the price oil companies pay for the crude oil that goes into our gasoline. America's big oil companies use crude oil that they have harvested from the ground or bought much cheaper on long term contracts to refine into gasoline. You'll see the results in next quarter's profit statements: big profits from both crude oil sales and refineries that make gasoline, what's called “upstream' and “downstream” operations in profit reports Consumer Watchdog has for years both tried to curb the opaqueness of the volatile speculative market for oil and to regulate supplies at gasoline refineries because oil companies game both systems, creating artificial shortages in the markets to jack up prices or exploiting historical events to justify obscene profits.

Read the full article →

Lucy P. Marcus: Inception Under Threat

March 2, 2011

I’m tracking a deeply disturbing trend: inception is under attack. Things that fall into categories of blue-skies, notional, and long-term thinking and investments, be it in people, planet, businesses, politics, or culture are under threat. The choices that lead to these decisions and cuts are named and blamed on many things — mostly tough economic times, impact investing, tactical concerns — but it all boils down to one thing: we are threatening our future because things that are intangible are easiest to cut in a need to demonstrate results and a drive to look impactful. Anything that is notional, hard to measure, early stage is in line to get slashed. This seems true from notional scientific research to libraries and early child education . It is not just happening in government. In board rooms around the world, companies are making tough decisions about where money is spent, and they are having a hard time justifying investing in their future when their present looks so shaky. These choices in turn touch not only the companies themselves but their impact also ripples out to their stakeholders, sectors, communities. The choices they make as to whether they invest in sustainable ways of operating , innovative solutions, or investing in their communities reach far into the future and help decide if we are all standing still or are even moving backwards. No society, community, company, entity can survive on impact-based, easily defined and easily measured things alone. It takes strong principled leaders with integrity and vision, skill and determination, in the public and private sectors to stand up and fight for the worth of investing in the future: without that there won’t be a terribly interesting future to look forward to and only regret to look back with. One of the most recognised phrases around the world begins with: “In the beginning…” but if we don’t invest in beginnings, how can we hope to see happy endings? Originally published on CSRwire and on the Marcus Ventures website .

Read the full article →

Cloudera Adds to Executive Team, Appoints Vice President of Finance

March 1, 2011

Mary Rorabaugh Brings Dynamic Experience at Managing High-Growth Companies

Read the full article →

BP Asks Judge To Dismiss Oil Spill Claims

March 1, 2011

NEW ORLEANS — BP and other companies sued over the massive Gulf oil spill are asking a federal judge to dismiss many of the claims filed by businesses and people who say they have been harmed by the disaster. U.S. District Judge Carl Barbier set Monday as a deadline for BP, Transocean and other companies to file motions to dismiss claims over last year’s deadly Deepwater Horizon rig explosion and the spill that followed it. Rig owner Transocean says many plaintiffs’ claims should be dismissed because they allegedly failed to follow the terms of the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 and filed suit before properly presenting their claims to BP. Barbier is presiding over more than 300 spill-related lawsuits and thousands of claims, including those by fishermen, property owners and tourist businesses.

Read the full article →

DigitalGlobe Names Information Industry Leader Jeffrey R. Tarr New President and CEO, General Howell M. Estes III New Chairman of the Board

February 28, 2011

Tarr Brings Track Record of Accelerating Profitable Growth and Creating Shareholder Value at Several of the World’s Leading Information Companies

Read the full article →

BP Signs $7.2 Billion India Deal

February 21, 2011

LONDON — BP PLC is paying India’s Reliance Industries $7.2 billion to take a stake in key oil and gas blocks, gaining a significant foothold in the Asian country as it continues to reposition global operations following the disastrous Gulf of Mexico spill. The tie-up, which could eventually amount to a $20 billion investment from BP, was announced Monday and includes an agreement between the two companies to form a joint venture to source and market gas. London-based BP is making the initial payment for a 30 percent stake in 23 oil and gas blocks across India covering around 270,000 square kilometers, making the partnership the country’s largest private sector holder of exploration acreage “The partnership will combine BP’s world-class deepwater exploration and development capabilities with Reliance’s project management and operations expertise,” the companies said in a statement after BP Chief Executive Robert Dudley and Reliance Chairman Mukesh Ambani signed the deal in London. BP said that potential future performance payments, based on exploration success that results in development of commercial discoveries, are worth $1.8 billion while overall investment could eventually rise to $20 billion. “India is one of the fastest growing economies in the world,” said Dudley. “By allying ourselves with Reliance, we will access the most prolific gas basin in India and secure a place in the fast growing Indian gas markets, creating a genuinely distinctive BP position.” The deal marks another major strategic step for BP in the wake of the Gulf of Mexico oil spill last year. The company earlier this month reported a $3.7 billion loss for 2010 – its first loss in almost 20 years – as a result of the Deepwater Horizon disaster. It also announced plans to rebound from the Gulf of Mexico by looking outside the United States, where it is selling almost half its U.S. refinery business. “This partnership meets BP’s strategy of forming alliances with strong national partners, taking material positions in significant hydrocarbon basins and increasing our exposure to growing energy markets,” BP Chairman Carl-Henric Svanberg said of the Reliance deal. The Reliance deal comes a month after BP signed an $8 billion share swap deal with Russia’s OAO Rosneft to explore the Russian Arctic region.

Read the full article →

Don McNay: A Beginner’s Guide to Stopping Payday Lenders

February 18, 2011

Just like last year and the year before, my home state of Kentucky failed to pass a cap on the interest payday lenders can charge their prey. A bill was proposed to put a 36% cap on the amount of interest that payday lenders could charge. It’s identical to the cap that the federal government put on payday lenders who deal with military personnel and their families. I think payday lending is a scummy business. I suspect many people agree with me. A referendum on capping payday lenders at 28% in Ohio got 63% of the vote. Most states don’t offer ballot initiatives and referendums. They elect legislators and ask them to represent us. Dealing with legislators does not seem to work for people fighting payday lenders. I’ve been rooting for the “good guys” for several years. And I’ve been watching them get clobbered for several years. It’s like watching the Harlem Globetrotters play the Washington Generals in basketball. The victories are few and far between for the Generals. Here is my advice for making something happen. Not just in Kentucky, but in any state: 1. Read Gary Rivlin’s book, Broke USA. Then wait a week and read it again. I reviewed Broke USA for Huffington Post and thought it was one of the most influential books to come out in some time. Rivlin is an incredible storyteller, and the rise of the “poverty industry,” where companies make money off the poorest of the poor, is an incredible story. Rivlin tells us how states like Ohio and North Carolina were able to successfully fight the payday industry. It would be easy for other states to model what they have done. I’ve personally given out over 30 copies of Broke USA, but more need to be purchased. I’m always stunned when someone committed to fighting payday lending tells me that he has never read Broke USA. It’s like a Christian minister preaching even though he or she has never read the Bible. Broke USA is a mandatory read for anyone who wants to fight payday lenders. 2. Embrace the “Great Person Theory.” Larry Diamond, who is now at Stanford, started his teaching career at Vanderbilt. He taught his social movement students, including me, a concept called the “Great Man Theory.” The thrust of that theory espouses is that causes are only successful when they have a central leader, like a Martin Luther King or a Gandhi, to be the focal point. In the days of Twitter and Facebook, it is easier to operate without a “Great Person.” But in fighting payday lending, it would help. Many of the groups fighting payday lending are part of larger coalitions with a litany of other legislative interests. Fighting payday lending is merely one of many issues on their plates. The payday lenders are all-in. It’s life or death for them. They hire the best lobbyists. In Kentucky, they hired former Secretary of State Bob Babbage, the state’s highest paid lobbyist. (Disclosure: Babbage is a former business associate and remains a close friend, despite our extreme differences on payday lending.) Payday lenders have a well-organized, well-financed front and that are going to fight to the death with everything they’ve got. They make lots of contributions to all the right people. Unless a “Great Person” steps up to the lead the other side, it’s going to be hard to defeat them. 3. Find a poster child for the payday industry’s ills. In 1998, I was part of a group that made Kentucky the first state to have model legislation reigning in the companies that purchased structured settlement payments. The bill had Harry Moberly, one of the state’s most effective legislators, as it sponsor. It had the backing of the state’s trial lawyers and bar association. But what really “sealed the deal” was a brave young woman, who had been horribly mistreated by a settlement purchasing company, came forward to tell her story. The day I saw her picture on the front of the Louisville Courier-Journal, I knew the battle was over. She put a human face on a back-burner issue and turned it into a front page issue. The bill passed the legislature unanimously. One of the reasons it was easy for Congress to put a 36% cap on payday lending for military people is that it was easy to imagine a soldier, serving in Iraq or Afghanistan, being taken advantage of. The human victim was present. 4. Show the legislatures you have clout. I’ve yet to see an election lost on the payday lending issue. That needs to happen before elected officials will take the opponents seriously. I can see a scenario where the issue could make or break an election, especially if a legislator got big campaign contributions from payday companies. When people wanting to get rid of payday lending get organized and vote out a couple of payday lending supporters, the rest of the legislatures will take them seriously. And, just maybe, pass this long-needed legislation. Don McNay, CLU, ChFC, MSFS, CSSC of Richmond, Kentucky, is an award-winning columnist, structured settlement consultant and Huffington Post Contributor. He is the author of the book, Son of a Son of a Gambler: Winners, Losers and What to Do When You Win the Lottery. He has appeared on the CBS Evening News With Katie Couric along with numerous other television and radio programs. You can read more about Don at www.donmcnay.com McNay has Master’s Degrees from Vanderbilt and the American College and is in the Hall of Distinguished Alumni of Eastern Kentucky University.

Read the full article →

Richard (RJ) Eskow: Hank Paulson: Ex-Goldman Sachs CEO, Ex-Bush Treasury Secretary, and Ex-actly Right

February 17, 2011

Somebody said that regulators need real power in order to be tough and effective. He said a strong, independent consumer protection agency is needed to help prevent the next financial crisis. And that we should help the millions of “responsible” homeowners hurt by the crash, instead of demonizing them. This guy described Fannie and Freddie’s assets as “bullsh*t capital” — $5.4 trillion of it, with taxpayers on the hook and potential debtors that included China and France. He also said this about the whole notion of privatizing a government activity: “To me, if there’s a guarantee, they should be a (government) utility (rather than a private company) — why should people get wealthy off of a government guarantee?” So who is this socialist — Noam Chomsky? He’s Hank Paulson, former Goldman Sachs CEO and Bush’s Treasury Secretary during the 2008 meltdown. Paulson’s interview with the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission may leave you wishing he was still in Washington. The clarity of his comments highlight the absurdity of those politicians who claim that the FCIC reached a “partisan” conclusion. Here’s a Wall Street powerhouse and GOP stalwart who’s saying the same things — and more. Paulson didn’t just express opinions to the FCIC. He also provided anecdotes that illustrate the real problem with Fannie, Freddie, and the entire “privatize government” movement: When you give government backing to people with private-sector incentives, very bad things happen. So as the media distracts itself (and us) with the power struggle between Democrats and Republicans, a conflict it insists on describes as the “left” versus the “right,” Paulson described problems and their solutions in ways that neither party’s leaders are willing to discuss. Paulson spoke to FCIC staff last April, and an internal memo summarized that conversation: Not enough regulation + no consumer protection = catastrophe Here’s how the memo summarized Paulson’s thoughts, under the heading “Sec. Paulson’s Evaluation of Root Causes of Crisis” (all emphases in these excerpts are mine): Sec. Paulson stated that the root causes of the crisis were housing policy in addition to the lack of regulation . He explained that many mortgages had big regulatory gaps and many mortgages issued in many number of states did not have an adequate regulator. Sec. Paulson recommended including in a regulatory blue print a consumer agency that focuses on consumer protection and a mortgage origination commission that evaluates the training and regulation that goes on a state level and will be able to evaluate the different programs so investors would be informed . [ pdf ] Look at what Paulson’s saying: We need more regulation (“regulatory gaps”) and more regulators. We need a “consumer agency that focuses on consumer protection” (we now have the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau — it was downgraded from an agency to a bureau by the Senate). We need better training and regulation at the state level (banks are now trying to overrule state regulations to escape the consequences of foreclosure fraud). Investors need to be better informed about where there investments are going (Mr. Paulson’s former company is, of course, a major offender in this area). How many of these ideas are being promoted today by either party? And about that “housing policy”: This may sound like the old right-wing theme that it’s over-reaching when government tries to help poor people, but that’s not what he’s saying. As I hear it, he’s saying that many people were encouraged to buy homes who would’ve been better off renting. The problem wasn’t that government was too activist, but that the “ownership society” idea (and other government policies, including taxation) used government to encourage over-borrowing by some homeowners, enriching financial speculators while creating needless risk for borrowers. A lot of innocent homeowners got hurt — and they weren’t getting enough help. Paulson held town hall-style meetings in hard-hit real estate markets like Burbank, Stockton, Orlando, Chicago, and Kansas City. “I was literally sickened in terms of what I saw in terms of what had happened to some people, the terms of the mortgages,” he told the FCIC staff. He added that “lending essentially shut down on the private side, so now we were in a situation where very responsible people who wanted to buy or refinance to prevent losing their homes under very reasonable terms were having difficulty doing so.” Paulson described his own efforts to get loans out to these homeowners, which met with strong resistance from Fannie and Freddie’s badly-incentivized executives. Since Paulson left office, the current Administration’s HAMP program has only helped a few hundred thousand people although an estimated eleven million homes are considered at risk for foreclosure, and HAMP has harmed many others through the “extend and pretend” phenomenon. Meanwhile the House is planning to eviscerate funding for all housing programs in the next budget. Ideological battles diverted Congress from the task at hand. It’s ironic how many politicians who get campaign money from Wall Street banks — banks which continue to collect billions in indirect government assistance — resist anything that might help homeowners, because American families who obtained mortgages from those banks are supposedly “undeserving.” From the FCIC memo: According to Sec. Paulson, the “march to reform” in 2008 was diverted because of “really what were inconsequential battles” in the House over the Hope for Homeowners legislation, which he called a “a flash point” in the debate about on one hand, bailing out irresponsible individuals, and on the other hand inflating the number of individuals it would actually help … the battle over the program delayed GSE regulatory reform from being accomplished. In other words, Representatives were trying so hard to score points by knocking homeowners that they delayed action on the big-picture reforms that were so desperately needed. Significantly, ten Republican on the House Financial Services Committee crossed party lines to join with Democrats in forwarding Hope For Homeowners to the floor of the House, proving once again that common-sense reform needn’t be and shouldn’t be a partisan issue. By privatizing Fannie and Freddie, we created a monster. Intentionally or not, Paulson paints the picture of a monster: A company run by private-sector sharks, backed by government guarantees but unwilling to help the government carry out its policy — and aggressively lobbying to undermine the very principles that led to its creation. From the FCIC memo: “I had been trying to work regulatory reform through Congress, the House was not a problem, the Senate was a big problem” … Sec. Paulson said that he felt it was necessary to get the GSEs on board with reform … “I wanted them [the GSEs] to reiterate in front of the Senators the commitment to raise capital,” Sec. Paulson said. “And also, we had figured out that we were not going to get regulatory reform done if they opposed it. They had a lot of contacts on both sides of aisle, and were enormously effective , and they had different views …” Here’s what Paulson doesn’t say: Like Sallie Mae , the institution created to issue government-backed student loans, Fannie and Freddie were privatized and then went on a lobbying rampage designed to undermine their very own mission in order to further enrich the executives in charge. Paulson ran into roadblocks when he tried to get these “government sponsored enterprises” to collaborate with the government during an emergency. “Regulators were downplaying [the capital situation],” said Paulson. “There was a little bit of regulatory capture going on, I think.” That’s an understatement: He’s referring to $5.4 trillion in loose securities that had the implicit guarantee of the Federal government. $1.7 trillion was held by foreign countries, and Paulson explains how messy it became when he tried to explain this illogical and risky public/private marriage to leaders from countries like China and France. From the memo: Sec. Paulson said that the enterprises had “flimsy capital” and he said that some people referred to it as “bullshit capital,” (the deferred tax asset, for example), and that the regulator had no discretion to use its judgment with respect to the level of capital. Added to that, the country promoted a policy where the companies were chartered by Congress, “try to go around the world and explain to one leader after another what this implicit-not-explicit government guarantee was about. To me, if there’s a guarantee, they should be a utility — why should people get wealthy off of a government guarantee? Regarding those regulators, Paulson’s putting it mildly. Fannie and Freddie’s overseers ” didn’t have the power of a normal safety and soundness regulator,” as he put it, adding: “I don’t want to leave Washington without there being some major attempt to make it better and get a regulator who was more power.” Overall, Paulson paints the picture of runaway enterprises that were designed to fulfill a government mission but structured to do what private corporations do – with the corrupting influence of government guarantees creating a recipe for disaster. The end result was almost inevitable: Overly aggressive and reckless officers, backed by a Board of Directors Paulson described as “cheeky” and uncooperative. Despite this experiences, what’s the most popular recommendation in Washington these days for reforming Fannie and Freddie? Making them even more “privatized.” Somebody really ought to listen to Hank Paulson. In fact, why not put him in charge of the SEC? I know, I know: He’s ex-Goldman. But hey, Joe Kennedy did a damned good job at the SEC under Roosevelt. This guy’s learned a thing or two, and we could use him now. Besides, nobody ever called Hank Paulson a socialist. Richard (RJ) Eskow, a consultant and writer (and former insurance/finance executive), is a Senior Fellow with the Campaign for America’s Future. This post was produced as part of the Curbing Wall Street project. Richard also blogs at A Night Light . He can be reached at “rjeskow@ourfuture.org.” Website: Eskow and Associates

Read the full article →

BP, ARCO Sued For Alleged Water Contamination From Toxic Mine

February 16, 2011

RENO, Nev. — Neighbors of a toxic mine in northern Nevada have filed a class-action lawsuit against BP America and Atlantic Richfield Co. accusing them of intentionally and negligently concealing the extent of the contamination leaking off the abandoned site for decades. The suit filed in U.S. District Court in Reno on Monday seeks a minimum of $5 million on behalf of at least 100 residents in the rural town of Yerington where the old Anaconda copper mine opened in 1941. The plaintiffs say the wells they once used for drinking water are polluted with uranium, arsenic and other metals in a plume of groundwater that slowly has migrated off of the site that covers 6-square miles – an area equal to the size of about 3,000 football fields – about 65 miles southeast of Reno. The lawsuit says that even after whistleblowers started to publicize previously secret records documenting the dangers, the corporations refused to cooperate with state and federal regulators trying to clean up the radioactive and other hazardous waste the past 10 years. “They destroyed the water supply to this community and now it’s time to clean it up. It’s time to get the contamination off these people’s land and out of their wells,” said Steven German, one of the lawyers who filed the lawsuit on behalf of the residents. “A mother should not have to tell her child they can’t turn on the spigot because their water is dangerous. That is not acceptable in this country,” he told The Associated Press on Tuesday. The lawsuit said the companies knew or should have known that their discharge of toxic and hazardous materials would pollute neighboring properties, air, water, groundwater and the surrounding environment. It said they have `intentionally allowed toxic and hazardous substances to enter and remain on” the neighbors’ land. “Despite their knowledge of the serious health and environmental effects associated with exposure to toxic and hazardous substances and despite orders and warnings form health and environmental regulators, (BP and ARCO) intentionally masked the true extent of the contamination, thereby enabling (them) to avoid taking all appropriate steps to properly remediate the toxic and hazardous substances or to mitigate the dangers created by their release, discharge, storage, handling, processing, disposal of and dumping of toxic and hazardous substances,” the suit said. Tom Mueller, a spokesman for BP America, said Tuesday evening that company officials have not had a chance to review the lawsuit and had no immediate comment. Fueled by demand after World War II, Anaconda produced nearly 1.75 billion pounds of copper from 1952-78 at the mine that runs along U.S. Highway 95 in the Mason Valley, an irrigated agricultural oasis in the area’s otherwise largely barren high desert. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has determined over the years that uranium was produced as a byproduct of processing the copper and that the radioactive waste was initially dumped into dirt-bottomed ponds that – unlike modern lined ponds – leaked into the groundwater. Officials for BP and its subsidiary Atlantic Richfield, which bought Anaconda Copper Co. in 1978, have provided bottled water for free to any residents who want it over the past few years. But they have insisted that uranium naturally occurs in the region’s soil and, until recently, they argued there was no way to prove that a half-century of processing metals there was responsible for the contamination. However, a new wave of EPA testing first reported by The Associated Press in November 2009 found that 79 percent of the wells tested north of mine have dangerous levels of uranium or arsenic or both that make the water unsafe to drink. “You now have evidence of mine-impacted groundwater,” Steve Acree, a highly regarded hydrogeologist for the EPA in Oklahoma brought in to examine the test results, told AP at the time. One monitoring well a half mile away had levels of uranium more than 10 times the legal drinking water standard. At the mine itself, wells tested as high as 100 times the standard in an area where ore was processed with sulfuric acid and other toxic chemicals in unlined ponds. Though the health effects of specific levels are not well understood, the EPA says long-term exposure to high levels of uranium in drinking water may cause cancer and damage kidneys.

Read the full article →

Sen. Sherrod Brown: We Can’t Afford to Give Up on American Workers

February 14, 2011

When Congress rushes through foreign trade agreements, proponents assure us that we’ll take care of the workers affected by unfair foreign trade. Last week, the Senate had the chance to match its words with actions by passing an extension of the Trade Adjustment Assistance Program (TAA) and the improved Health Coverage Tax Credit (HCTC). Both programs expired on February 12. Legislation to extend them passed the House last year with strong bipartisan support. This legislation would have continued the Trade Adjustment Assistance program — which helps dislocated workers who lost their jobs due to unfair foreign trade — retrain for new jobs. It would have also extended the improved Health Coverage Tax Credit, a lifeline that allows retirees whose pensions have been jeopardized by plant closures — including 5,000 Delphi retirees in Ohio — afford health coverage. Yet Washington politicians blocked an extension of these critical programs on Thursday evening. These politicians don’t think twice about voting for a trade bill, but they dismiss American workers and retirees fighting to pay the bills. Our actions bring consequences, and so does our inaction. TAA and the improved HCTC are expiring at the expense of Americans who worked hard and played by the rules, yet lost their jobs, their pensions, their health care — or all three. These program help tens of thousands of Americans either get back to work or regain some measure of the financial security that has been stripped from them due to unfair foreign trade. But the difficult reality faced by too many workers reliant on TAA and the HCTC reminds us of the effects of trade and globalization. Just last month I visited the Mahoning Valley One Stop to listen to workers who are using TAA to develop new skills in order to find new and secure jobs. I was there with a simple message. We can’t pass trade agreements that undermine Ohio workers and then turn our backs on those workers when their jobs are moved overseas. The TAA and HCTC enhancements aren’t expensive or complicated. In just the last two years, more than 155,000 additional trade-affected workers across the country who might not have been certified under the former TAA program became eligible for TAA assistance. That’s because under this program, unlike the old program, workers whose jobs are shipped to India or China — or other countries with which we do not have a trade agreement — are now eligible. These Americans are rubber workers from Johnson Rubber Company in Wood County. They are furniture manufacturers from Masco in Jackson County, or aluminum castings manufacturers from Mansfield Brass and Aluminum in Richland County. In addition, workers in the service industry are eligible for TAA. These workers include engineers at Belcan Engineering in Cincinnati and computer programmers at Electronic Data Systems in Fairborn. It includes researchers at the Transportation Research Center in Moraine. In total, more than 367,000 workers nationwide have been certified eligible for TAA since 2009. These workers use TAA to acquire new skills to return to work as quickly as possible. Middle class families, American manufacturers and farmers, and community leaders across the country all know that TAA is a critical part of our nation’s economic strategy. It helps the private sector hire workers with the right skills, and it helps workers transition into these jobs. In addition, the HCTC program also helps these trade-affected workers and retirees who lose their benefits when their employer goes bankrupt. HCTC allows the workers and retirees purchase private health coverage to replace the employer-sponsored coverage they lost. It is in no one’s best interest for Americans to lose their private health insurance. The HCTC prevents tens of thousands of Americans from falling into the ranks of the uninsured, which can lead to increased need for Medicaid. These are Americans who worked hard, were loyal to their companies, and earned their pensions and employer-sponsored health coverage day after day after day. That’s until the day they watched it all evaporate. The combination of TAA and HCTC is a winner for business, for workers, and for our economy. It will boost the economy. And it is too important for the country. Our fight to extend these critical lifelines is far from over.

Read the full article →

Stocks in U.S. Open Lower after Disappointing Results from Companies

February 10, 2011

Stocks in U.S. Open Lower after Disappointing Results from Companies

Read the full article →

Lack of Data from the U.S. Continues, and Investors Focus on Companies’ Earnings

February 9, 2011

Lack of Data from the U.S. Continues, and Investors Focus on Companies’ Earnings

Read the full article →

David Kroodsma: 40 Interviews in Davos

February 4, 2011

Cross posted on Hub Culture . For five days last week I was a fly on the wall in Davos, watching CEOs and leaders discuss the planet’s major issues at the World Economic Forum. I attended the conference as a social media producer for Hub Culture , producing short video interviews of thought leaders. Hub Culture is a social network of “global urban influencers,” and in Davos we occupied a building that served as a center for work, collaboration, and evening events . At the Hub Culture Social Media Center we interviewed forty influential leaders. These five-minute interviews, conducted by our executive editor Edie Lush, let individuals share why they were at Davos. CEOs of major corporations, directors of global non-profits, and other thought leaders sat in the Hub Culture “hot seat” and shared their concerns. The following is an attempt to distill some of the major themes of these interviews. Obviously, the forty interviews don’t fall neatly into the categories below, and many people touched on multiple themes in their few minutes. All of the links below lead to videos of the individuals; click to hear the full stories. Did Davos Have a Theme? Every World Economic Forum has a stated “theme,” which sometimes relates to the actual theme of the conference. Last year, as the world was emerging from the global recession, the theme was “Improve the State of the World: Rethink, Redesign, Rebuild.” This year the theme was “Shared Norms for the New Reality,” which made everyone scratch their head. What is the “new reality” of the world, and what are the norms? The former Prime Minister of Australia, Kevin Rudd , said he would rather state the goal as “shared values for common challenges.” (Off camera he asked, “Who are these guys named Norm that we are sharing?”) Rudd said that in the sessions he attended there was active debate over whether different countries of the world shared values or not. In one session the audience was split 50/50 on whether or not the West has common values with China with respect to global challenges. Justin Blake, a managing director at Edelman , has now attended nine World Economic Forums, giving him a unique perspective. He said that this was the first Davos where there was no clear focus or theme, as if the world appears more splintered as it becomes more connected. Moreover, outside news–notably the chaos in Egypt–over shadowed any news from the conference. Ian Bremmer, the President of the Eurasia Group , a firm that consults with businesses on political risk, expounded on what he thought was the “new reality.” He said that we are seeing a new type of globalization as the emerging markets flex their muscles and no longer take orders from the western powers. His major concern is what he called the “G-0″ (as opposed to the G-20)–the fact that there is no effective global governance. He cited the failures of climate and trade negotiations. Some claimed that a major focus of this year’s Forum was social inequality, which is on the rise in many parts of the world. Jasmine Whitbread, the CEO of Save the Children , felt that in previous years her comments on social inequity were ignored; this year she gained more attention. The Way Workers Interact with the Economy has Fundamentally Changed. Malcom Frank, the Senior Vice President of Cognizant Technology Solutions , said that we are seeing the “future of work” because the generation now entering the workforce won’t accept the rigid hierarchies common in corporations. Businesses will need to be more flexible. In the information age, work no longer has to be done “at work,” but can be performed remotely and at any time. This message was echoed by Jeffery Joerris, the CEO of Manpower , who even argued that we are no longer in the “Information Age,” but instead in the “Human Age.” In the “Human Age” ( see article here ), the focus is on individual talent instead of the corporation. He also remarked that companies have been reluctant to hire during this economic recovery because they’ve realized they can be just as productive with fewer people. Arianna Huffington, the chief editor of the Huffington Post , talked about the explosion in unemployment, and how many in the United States’ middle class have experienced “downward mobility” as individuals have dropped into poverty. She implored governments to do more. Media and Social Media are Rapidly Changing One career that has changed dramatically in the past few years is journalism. We talked with Mike Perlis, the President and CEO of Forbes . Perlis described how Forbes’s online media has succeeded because it has adapted quickly to the changing ways that people consume information. Likewise, Justin Blake of Edelman (mentioned earlier), said that a few years ago everyone was surprised when the first blogger showed up at the Forum. Forum meetings were supposed to be “off the record.” Now, because of twitter and blogging, everything is shared and no one expects secrecy. Robert Scoble, a Rackspace Innovation Journalist and blogger on the popular site Scobleizer.com , described how twitter gave him his own little news feed on the world, giving him updates every second. “It’s like having a CNN news feed on my screen. I’ve always wanted that!” The Global Gender Imbalance A number of our interviews highlighted the need to empower women in business. Rachel Kyte, the Vice-President of the International Finance Corporation , told us that women run sixty percent of the world’s small businesses, but in some countries only five percent of the bank credit is awarded to females. She also cited numerous studies revealing that companies do better if women are on the corporate boards. Wendy Clark, the senior Vice President of Integrated Marketing and Communications for The Coca-Cola Company , talked about Coca-Cola’s efforts to empower women franchise owners. Coca-Cola has a goal of empowering five million female entrepreneurs by 2020. Currently, many female entrepreneurs lack sufficient training, networks, or access to capital. Clark admitted that these efforts are good business practice for Coca-Cola, because small beverage outfits run by women tend to do better than those run by men. Laura Liswood, the Secretary General of the Council of Women’s Leaders , lamented the slow progress in getting women into corporate boardrooms. She also gave a cultural anecdote to explain why corporate boardrooms ate still dominated by western males. And while we did see female executives (Indra Nooyi, the CEO of PepsiCo spent time at Hub Culture, and we also interviewed Beth Comstock, a senior Vice President of GE ), Davos remains a mostly male affair. Only 16 percent of the roughly 2,500 fully accredited attendees were women. Consumer Empowerment We interviewed the heads of two organizations that are attempting to empower consumers. Joost Martens, the Director-General of Consumers International (a global umbrella organization that includes U.S.-based Consumer Reports), said that the world is becoming more globalized but there are not yet global standards for the quality and safety of products. His organization hopes to change that. Dara O’Rouke, the founder of GoodGuide , described how his company researches the social and environmental impacts of various products and makes the information freely available. In the interview he showed us a new iPhone app that allows consumers to scan a product’s barcode and get vital statistics about the social, health, or environmental consequences of the item. Sustainability Has Become Popular and Profitable, But Will It Be Enough? To promote collaboration and climate solutions, Hub Culture hosted Climate Deal Day during the World Economic Forum ( watch a Wall Street Journal video about the event ). Consequently, we interviewed many individuals concerned with climate and other environmental issues. These conversations gave us many reasons to be hopeful; the question is whether our solutions will be sufficient. Peter Lacy, the Managing Director of Sustainability Services for Accenture , said that businesses now understand the importance of sustainability. In a global survey of CEOs, Accenture found that 93% of company leaders say that environmental sustainability is key to their long-term success. Just three years ago, this figure was twenty percent lower. Lacy also said that the challenge is no longer recognizing the issue, but instead figuring out how to embed sustainability in the companies. He then added that more organizations see sustainability as “an opportunity” instead of a burden or a risk. We interviewed the founders of two companies who believe in this opportunity. Kevin Surace, the CEO of Serious Materials , spoke about the high tech windows and walls that his company has developed to improve building efficiency. Nearly all of his company’s products have a payback time of less than two years, making them great investments for consumers. Likewise, Graham Andrews, the founder of Andrews Power , talked about his extremely high efficient air conditioners that dramatically reduce energy use. The challenge is to get people to use these new technologies. Peggy Liu, the chairperson of JUCCCE (The Joint U.S-China Collaboration on Clean Energy), talked about the difficulties of getting knowledge to the right places. “There is no lack of interest to go green in China,” said Liu. The problem is access to technology, and Liu announced an innovative new plan to allow Chinese investors and U.S. research institutions to cooperate and develop clean technology. Dr. Han Seung-soo, the former Prime Minister of South Korea and the current Chairman of the Global Green Growth Institute , partially echoed Liu’s ideas. Seung-soo’s country developed rapidly in the past few decades, converting itself from a poor country to a rich one in less than half a century. Dr. Seung-soo said that the rest of the world can’t develop in the same intensive way that South Korea did, and the Green Growth Institute will help developing nations grow their economies more sustainably. Ian Cheshire, the Group Chief Executive for Kingfisher , Europe’s leading home improvement store, talked in depth about his company’s efforts to provide sustainable, efficient products for home owners and builders. We also spoke with Ann Davlin, the Director of Development for the Carbon War Room , who told of a number of other companies who are also stepping up and taking action. One of Hub Culture’s partners in Davos was the Renault-Nissan Alliance, which has developed the electric cars the Nissan Leaf and Renault Fluence. At Hub Culture we had two charging stations for these cars, and we spoke with a number of people involved in the marketing or design of these vehicles. Nissan’s Head of Marketing, Simon Sproule , said that in 2011 the electric vehicle has finally come of age. Gilles Gautherot, the Communications Manager of the Renault-Nissan Alliance , told us that the real breakthrough has been making these cars “just like any other ordinary car, except much quieter.” Jack Hidary, the Global Electric Vehicle Leader for Hertz , talked about making electric cars available through Hertz, and he described innovative new car sharing programs for electric cars. We felt we saw the future when Hidetushi Kadota, the Chief Engineer for the Nissan Leaf , walked us outside and proudly showed off his company’s car. Unfortunately, the environmental challenges that we face are acute. Christiana Figueres, the Executive Secretary of the UNFCCC (United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change), said that the global agreement reached in Cancun last December was “A big step forward for the community of nations, but a small step for the planet.” In other words, even though substantial progress was made, the progress still falls far short of what is needed to stop climate change. The Executive Director of Greenpeace International, Kumi Naido , agreed, saying that “time is running out,” and cited various scientific reports. Carl Ganter, the founder of Circle of Blue , a firm focused on freshwater issues, pointed out that water shortages could also limit our energy use. Finally, the President of the Environmental Defense Fund, Fred Krupp , talked about the dire state of the world’s fisheries and his organization’s efforts to change the way we fish. — A few of our interviews couldn’t be lumped into these categories, but they provided important insights nonetheless. Beth Comstock, General Electric’s Senior Vice President and Chief Marketing Officer , talked about innovation around the world and her company’s “Innovation Barometer.” Malini Mehra, the founder and CEO of the Centre for Social Markets , discussed the need to look at climate issues, food security, and water issues as an integrated set. Johnathan Reckford, the CEO of Habitat for Humanity International , talked about providing micro financing to help people build homes around the world. Simon Zadek, the founder of AccountAbility , talked about the challenge of taking ideas generated during meetings in Davos and then applying them. Atsutoshi Nishida, the Chairman of Toshiba , talked about many issues related to innovation, and he also convinced us that we needed a 3D television. Bernardo Guillamon, the Manager of the Office of Partnerships at the Inter-American Development Bank , talked about the bank’s efforts to help Haiti and invest in education there. Salil Shetty, the Secretary General of Amnesty International , explained how the growing power of corporations had changed his organization’s strategy. Amnesty International has traditionally pressured governments to protect human rights. Now, as corporations become more powerful and more global, Amnesty International need to increasingly engage with companies in order to protect the rights of people around the world. As these interviews have shown, the world is a rapidly changing place. The way we work is changing, as is the way we consume media and interact. Although environmental challenges are getting much more attention, it is not yet clear if that attention will translate into sufficient action. Likewise, more are aware of the need for gender equality in business, but we need to move from awareness to action. The global community faces countless issues, and as many of these leaders said in these interviews, it will take much more than just talk to solve them.

Read the full article →

Video: Murdoch Launches Daily Digital Publication for IPad

February 3, 2011

(Corrects misspelling in headline.) Feb. 3 (Bloomberg) — News Corp.’s Rupert Murdoch introduced an electronic news publication tailored specifically for Apple Inc.’s iPad, a bid to expand his media empire with a new business model for delivering content digitally. Called the Daily, the publication will cost 99 cents a week or $39.99 a year, the companies said at a news conference in New York yesterday. Bloomberg’s Deirdre Bolton reports in today’s Movers & Shakers. (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Jobless Claims Fall After Harsh Winter Weather

February 3, 2011

WASHINGTON — The number of people applying for unemployment benefits plunged last week, reversing a spike from the previous week largely caused by harsh winter weather. Applications for benefits dropped by 42,000 to a seasonally adjusted 415,000 in the week ending Jan. 29, the Labor Department said Thursday. They had surged in the previous week after snow storms in the South disrupted work and led to temporary layoffs. Applications are well below their peak of 651,000, reached in March 2009, when the economy was deep in recession. Fewer than 425,000 people applying for benefits is consistent with modest job growth. But applications will need to fall consistently below 375,000 to signal a likely decline in the unemployment rate. Last week’s decline resumes a downward trend that took shape late last year. The four-week average, a less volatile measure, fell steadily in the last three months of 2010 to a two-year low of 411,250 in the week ending Jan. 1. That raised hopes that employers, operating with lean work forces, would soon step up hiring. “The drop … is definitely a positive,” Dan Greenhaus, chief economic strategist at Miller Tabak, said. While applications are still at an elevated level, “the trend has generally been lower as the bulk of the firings are now behind us.” The average rose in January, mostly because of seasonal factors, such as the harsh weather and the layoff of temporary holiday employees. The average ticked up last week by 1,000 to 430,500. Many economists consider data in January to be less reliable because of seasonal fluctuations. Unemployment applications reflect the level of layoffs, but can also indicate whether companies are willing to hire. Despite the decline in unemployment benefit applications, employers have been slow to add jobs. One factor holding back job gains is that workers are becoming increasingly efficient and productive. That enables companies to produce more without hiring more workers. In a separate report Thursday, the Labor Department said that productivity, the amount of output per hour worked, rose 3.6 percent in 2010, the biggest increase since 2002. Employers will likely create a net total of 2.2 million jobs this year, according to a survey of economists by the AP. That’s double the number that was generated in 2010. Consumers are forecast to spend a little more freely, boosting economic growth to about 3.2 percent in 2011, up from 2.9 percent in 2010. But the economy would need to grow much faster – closer to 5 percent for a year – to substantially reduce unemployment. Analysts project that the unemployment rate will fall to 8.9 percent by the end of this year, according to the AP Economy Survey. The number of people on the unemployment benefit rolls fell by 84,000 to 3.9 million, the Labor Department’s report said. Those figures are one week behind the data on applications. That doesn’t include millions more people who are receiving benefits under emergency federal programs enacted during the recession. About 4.55 million people received aid under the extended benefit programs in the week ending Jan. 15, the latest data available. Those programs provide up to 99 weeks of aid in the states with the highest unemployment rates. Overall, nearly 9.3 million people are receiving unemployment aid. That’s down from about 9.4 million the previous week.

Read the full article →