customer

Huffington Post…

NEW YORK (Reuters) – It may not be a blood bath, but it will definitely be a dogfight. The television aisles of top U.S. retailers are poised for a hard-fought contest this holiday season as chains take little chances with budget-conscious shoppers. Unlike last year when some such as Best Buy held the line on discounts and promoted only high-end TVs, many retailers told Reuters this past week that they plan to do whatever it takes to get the customer through the door. For the consumer, expect to see price cuts of up to 40 percent from a year ago on big-screen TVs, plus free shipping deals and even a 36-month financing option, in the run-up to ”Black Friday” on Nov. 25, the unofficial start of the holiday selling season. “As we look at the holiday season, we are going to play offense,” Hhgregg Inc Chief Executive Officer Dennis May told Reuters in an interview last week. “We are going to be very promotional. We are going to be aggressive.” U.S. shoppers have held off on buying televisions and other nonessential items in the anemic economy. But the TV market is also a victim of a lackluster product cycle. Early last week, Japanese manufacturer Sony Corp warned investors that its TV division is headed for its eighth consecutive annual loss, while rival Panasonic Corp forecast its biggest annual net loss in a decade. “My outlook is not any different from Panasonic and Sony,” Anthony Chukumba, an analyst with BB&T Capital Markets said. ”We have a lull right now in terms of TV demand; part of it is macro-driven, part of it is product cycle-driven. There is just not a lot of innovation out there. “And a couple of things that may in fact just have been counted on to drive incremental demand like 3-D and Internet-connected smart TVs are just not working.” Against this backdrop, global demand for televisions is expected to fall about 1 percent in the fourth quarter, according to Paul Gagnon, director of North American TV research for consulting firm Display Search. This will fuel the intense fight for shoppers as they look for the biggest bang for their buck during the holiday season. “It is starting even earlier than usual. You are seeing sharp promotions. You are seeing Wal-Mart out there with a TV this weekend and Amazon.com with special deals. It is upping the overall intensity,” Bernstein analyst Colin McGranahan said. “It is going to be a dogfight. Everyone’s going to be fighting because demand is not great,” McGranahan said. Best Buy has already said it would offer free shipping on online orders from Nov. 1 through Dec. 27. On TVs costing more than $899, the world’s largest consumer electronics chain is offering 36-month financing, a 60-day price guarantee and a promise to even pick up the TV from the customer’s house if the model was not what he or she really wanted. “Given economic realities, consumers are definitely more discerning this holiday season, definitely looking for the best value for their money,” Mike Mohan, senior vice president and general manager of Home Theater at Best Buy, said. FOCUS IS ON BIGGER SCREENS Industry watchers expect retailers to focus less on promoting special features like 3-D technology, which can be difficult for the average consumer to understand. “Today’s TVs have so many capabilities such as Smart TV, Internet and 3-D technology and there are also a lot of confusing terms such as screen refresh rate and HDMI Inputs. Consumers can become overwhelmed and have difficulty understanding what television will meet their needs,” Jim Hilson, BJ’s Wholesale vice president of merchandising said. Instead, they expect the focus to be on screen size, stressing the increased affordability of big screens. “In the U.S. which is one of the more mature markets around the world for TVs, one that has already largely gone through the flat-panel TV transition, mostly what people are out there doing right now is updating the size,” Gagnon said. Hhgregg said it is carrying more giant TVs with 60-inch and above screens, and reducing its inventory of 32- and 40-inch TVs this holiday season. “I can get a 60-inch TV for what I used to pay for a 40-inch TV,” Hhgregg CEO May said. “The screen size the consumer has always wanted has become affordable to them now.” Due to their focus on larger sizes, retailers including Best Buy, BJ’s, Sam’s Club and Hhgregg told Reuters that they will not be reducing their shelf space for televisions despite the uncertainty in demand. “To some degree, the 42 (inch) is the new 32. The 55 is the new 42,” said Jason Shaw, vice president of merchandising for electronics at Wal-Mart’s Sam’s Club warehouse store operation. ”They are getting more for their money than they have ever gotten before.” (Reporting by Dhanya Skariachan in New York, editing by Bernard Orr and Maureen Bavdek) Copyright 2011 Thomson Reuters. Click for Restrictions .

Follow this link:
TV Retailers Plan To Be ‘Aggressive’ With Promotions On Black Friday

Find our Weekly Commercial Real Estate, Private Equity and Fund Newsletters at www.WeeklyBrief.net

It can be imperative to watch out for aggressive zwalczanie komarow when finding a people mortgage loan , in the end the customer will probably be putting their most valued piece endangered – their apartment . These loan merchants can use …

More:
Uncomplicated Tips on House owner Loans | Sacramento Video Marketing

4 Examples Of Successful Joint Ventures

May 31, 2011

Joint venture commercial real estate . 07:51Examples of how rates of returns are increased by using joint ventures in commercial real estate . www.mdcrei.com. Joint Venture . 06:22. Strategic Joint Ventures & learn why your …

Read the full article →

Venafi Appoints Veteran Customer Services Leader Dave Cutler to Vice President of Worldwide Customer Support

May 26, 2011

New Appointee to Expand and Strengthen Company’s World-Class Customer Service Operations With 20 Years of Demonstrated Leadership Experience

Read the full article →

Tealeaf Names Jawahar Malhotra Vice President of Engineering

May 24, 2011

Pioneer in Web Infrastructure and Applications, Platform as a Service, and Analytics Platforms Brings Additional Expertise to Customer Experience Management Leader

Read the full article →

MetraTech Expands Leadership Team

May 19, 2011

Experienced Veterans Deepen Vision in Technology, Industry and Customer Care Arenas

Read the full article →

Egnyte Appoints Janet Matsuda Vice President of Marketing

May 18, 2011

Twenty-Year High-Tech Industry Veteran Joins Egnyte to Drive Marketing Strategy and Customer Adoption

Read the full article →

NetIQ Adds Identity, Security and Select Data Center Lines From Novell; Announces New Executive Leadership Team

May 18, 2011

Powerful Combination of Solutions, Deep Expertise and Global Support Delivers Greater Customer Value

Read the full article →

Former PayPal Executive Signs on at Zuora to Drive Customer Success

April 28, 2011

Todd Pearson Brings Deep Experience in Growing Dynamic Commerce Businesses and Delivering Enterprise Customer Success

Read the full article →

Local Splash Welcomes New Director of Customer Service

April 28, 2011

Andrea Beidl Joins the Local Splash Family as Director of Customer Service

Read the full article →

Varolii Names Craig Kruck as Vice President of Professional Services

April 26, 2011

Senior Technology Executive to Drive Process Change and Customer Satisfaction to New Levels

Read the full article →

Ernan Roman: Which Social Media Channels Matter Most?

April 20, 2011

THE PROBLEM: “Competition is eating away at our market share… and using social media to do it.” THE SOLUTION: Recalibrate your social media plan. Interview your customers and prospects to learn which social media channels are most important to them and why. Conduct in-depth interviews to learn exactly what kind of value and information they expect from you…a cross multiple channels. Use the voice of customer insights to craft a new, multichannel customer engagement strategy. It’s true: Ignoring or minimizing the importance of social media now carries major competitive risks. Today’s consumers not only demand that the companies they buy from offer them easy access through multiple channels… but they also expect companies to keep track of all their interactions across multiple channels! That expectation definitely includes social media exchanges. In addition, an organization’s highest-value customers interact with the enterprise through more than one channel. That applies to social media channels like Facebook, LinkedIn, and Twitter as well. Today, offering customers multichannel access using these and other social media tools is not merely a trendy add-on to a single campaign, but a long-term strategic imperative for the whole enterprise. A recent study conducted by BtoB magazine found that 93% of all business to business marketers are now “engaged to some extent” in social media marketing campaigns. Major takeaways from this and related recent research include: LinkedIn is a major lead generator in the B to B segment. At this stage, it should be considered an important part of any B to B channel mix. Facebook is the next most popular business-to-business social media channel, despite its emphasis on connections with friends and family. This is largely because of its potential strength in the area of branding. Despite wide use, Twitter has serious limitations, including a perception by many of “spamminess.” Customer communities and targeted message boards can yield major competitive insights — as well as invaluable first-hand feedback about your target audience’s messaging, value, and channel preferences. TRY THIS: Use feedback from in-depth (60-minute or longer) VOC interviews to identify which of the “big three” social media networks (Facebook, Twitter, and LinkedIn) your customers prefer for communication with your company… and why. Learn exactly what kind of access, updates, and value customers expect to receive through these channels. Build the best suggestions into a brand new social media plan. Be sure, while you are conducting VOC interviews, to also learn how customers want to engage with you across the broader multichannel mix, of which social media are one important element. Get fresh VOC feedback on a quarterly basis (at least) on how your execution of this plan is being received by customers. Ernan Roman is President of the marketing consultancy, Ernan Roman Direct Marketing. Recognized as the industry pioneer who created three transformational methodologies: Integrated Direct Marketing, Opt-In Marketing, and Voice of Customer Relationship Research. Clients include Microsoft, NBC Universal, Disney, Hewlett-Packard and IBM. Ernan was named to “B to B’s Who’s Who” as one of the “100 most influential people” in Business Marketing by Crain’s B to B Magazine. His fourth and latest book on marketing best practices is titled: Voice of the Customer Marketing: A Proven 5-Step Process to Create Customers Who Care, Spend, and Stay . Ernan is also the co-author of “Opt-In Marketing: Increase Sales Exponentially with Consensual Marketing” and author of “Integrated Direct Marketing: The Cutting Edge Strategy for Synchronizing Advertising, Direct Mail, Telemarketing and Field Sales.” www.erdm.com ernan@erdm.com

Read the full article →

Aprimo Names New Vice President for Asia Pacific and Japan

April 12, 2011

Dennis Samuel to Help Expand Aprimo’s Customer Base in Asia

Read the full article →

Inktel Direct Hires Jim Shriver as New Director of Client Services

April 6, 2011

Industry Veteran to Lead the Enhancement of Inktel Direct’s Customer Service Initiatives

Read the full article →

Verizon Customers Exposed In Massive U.S. Data Breach

April 6, 2011

(NEW YORK) – Customers of Verizon Communications had their email addresses exposed in a massive online data breach last week, according to an email to customers obtained by Reuters. In what could be one of the biggest such attacks in U.S. history, a computer hacker penetrated the online marketer Epsilon, which controls the customer email databases for a broad swath of companies. Customers of about 50 companies, from banks to retailers and hotels, had their names or email addresses exposed in the attack. Verizon, the largest U.S. mobile telephone carrier, informed customers on Tuesday that it was part of the Epsilon data breach. “Epsilon has assured us that the information exposed was limited to email addresses, and that no other information about you or your account was exposed,” Verizon said in an email to a customer sent on Tuesday evening. The company did not immediately respond to requests for comment. (Reporting by Maria Aspan in New York and Diane Bartz in Washington; Editing by Bernard Orr) Copyright 2011 Thomson Reuters. Click for Restrictions .

Read the full article →

Dave Lerner: Interview With NYC Startup STELLAService Co-Founder Jordy Leiser

April 5, 2011

Welcome to this week’s conversation with Jordy Leiser , CEO of STELLAService , one of the most intriguing and sought-after venture-backed startups in NYC. STELLAService rates the customer service performance of online stores and was recently featured in AdAge ( here ) and on TechCrunch ( here ). Jordy Leiser – CEO of Stella Service from Venture Studio on Vimeo . Below is a short table of contents (with corresponding minutes) of our conversation: 00:27 Jordy’s background & how it led to the founding of STELLAService 01:30 Who invested, how the deal came together 02:50 Who is this new player in town, Consiglieri ? 4:39 The size of their angel and venture rounds 05:25 Who’s the team behind STELLAService? 06:30 Why’d they choose to set-up shop in NYC? 07:15 How a high school internship framed Jordy’s perception of branding 07:34 Jordy’s previous work with IMG and his experience in sports licensing 08:12 The business model 09:45 The STELLAService Seal and what it means for a company to carry it 10:25 Who are some of the companies displaying the seal? 12:02 How are brands picked and evaluated? 13:25 What’s the company doing with all the data it’s accumulating? 14:13 How many brands are displaying the seal? 16:00 What’s Jordy learning about running a company? 16:30 What’s currently happening at STELLAService? 17:08 Are they hiring? This post originally appeared on www.davidblerner.com

Read the full article →

Largest Cable Bill Ever?

April 4, 2011

It’s easy to rack up a huge cable bill, but not $16 million easy. Lt. Daniel DeVirgilio of Beaverton, Ohio was more than stunned to learn his credit card had been rejected by Time Warner Cable . He was even more surprised when he learned just how much the company had tried to charge him. The number totalled $16,409,107, according to MSNBC . Apparently his March Madness charges had gone a bit haywire. He had been charged over $1 million for each game of the March Madness Sweet 16 he had watched, according to the Dayton Daily News . But he was humorous about the whole affair. “Had I known this I would have bought Showtime,” DeVirgilio, an engineer at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, told the Daily News . “Five bucks more for Showtime is a bit much, but heck — $16,409,112. Who cares?” The bill was ultimately attributed to human error. DeVirgilio never actually received a paper bill for the amount, and it wasn’t charged to his credit card, according to MSNBC . “We apologize for the inconvenience that it caused,” a spokesman for Time Warner said. “We are going to work with the customer to get this resolved.”

Read the full article →

Ramtron Strengthens Its Management Team

March 29, 2011

Names Ying Shiau Vice President of Customer Satisfaction

Read the full article →

Dr. Philip Neches: AT&T and T-Mobile: Back to the Future

March 24, 2011

Many analysts complain, with justification, that the proposed merger of T-Mobile into AT&T would create a duopoly in domestic cell phone service. The combined company would have roughly 42% market share; Verizon, the current leader, would come in second at 32%; Sprint would be a poor third at 17%; other carriers divide up the remaining 9%. ( GAO 2009 data ) After three decades of invention, growth, and consolidation, we would be back to 1982. That’s when the FCC granted the first commercial license for cellular service to Advanced Mobile Phone Service, Inc. — a subsidiary of AT&T. The license came with a hard-fought condition: the FCC would license a second carrier in each city. The cell phone, like so much of the technology we take for granted today, was invented at Bell Labs . A 1947 paper by D. H. Ring (that’s really his name!) described the idea of using many low-power transmitters, each serving a relatively small “cell”. The cells would be arranged in a hexagonal “honeycomb” pattern. The paper described a hand-off of a call from cell to cell as the caller moved around. It also described how the same frequency could be re-used in different cells, allowing far more calls to be handled. The concept was far beyond what even Bell Labs could implement in those days of relays and vacuum tubes. It sat on the shelf until the 1960s, when Richard Frenkiel and Joel Engel took up the challenge by applying integrated electronics and computers. President Clinton recognized their work with the National Medal of Technology in 1994. In 1971, AT&T proposed the first cellular service concept to the FCC. Years of hearings followed. The two-carrier decision emerging along the way to first field trials in 1978 in Chicago and Newark. By 1982, it was ready for to go commercial. The same year, AT&T broke up into seven “Baby Bell” regional operating companies and “Ma Bell”: long distance, Bell Labs, and Western Electric. The FCC’s earlier decision to require at least two cell phone carriers per city proved prescient. While the Baby Bells lumbered into the cell phone business, literally hundreds of entrepreneurs stormed out of the gate, each building out service in a single city. A few years earlier, the same thing happened with cable television service. Entrepreneurs wired cities and towns. Then a few entrepreneurs started consolidating local operations into larger and larger regional, and ultimately national, providers. A few, like Comcast in cable and McCaw in wireless, became giants. At the same time that local systems were consolidating into regional and national systems, both cable television and cellular phone service started to replace their original analog technologies with digital. Digital expanded the capability of both services by factors of 10 to 100 (number of channels for cable, number of calls for cellular), while lowering the cost. Plus, digital meant entirely new kinds of wireless services became possible: text messaging, mobile e-mail, mobile Internet, and so on. Demand exploded, and in less than a decade, cellular went from relative luxury to everyday necessity. The United States was the first nation to have cell phones, and was the first market to saturate: today 96% of Americans have cell phones . Market saturation means that carriers have less motivation to innovate to win new customers, because there are few unserved customers left to win. Competition among cellular carriers devolved into a stark battle to retain customers and margins. That’s hard enough to do when you have strong differentiation: it’s very, very hard when there is little difference in the nature, quality, or price of the service. Innovation is still very important in a late-stage market. But it’s more difficult, because the new product or service must fit into the existing base. Old customers will not abandon everything they are used to even for a very compelling innovation. That is why products like Apple’s iPhone and iPad are so hot: they make existing services easier to use and provide a platform for applications that provide new utility on top of existing services. Thus AT&T was willing to concede so much to Apple to be the exclusive provider of cellular service for iPhones. It may have been a Faustian bargain for AT&T, however. While the iPhone got existing AT&T users to upgrade their service and won customers away from other carriers, iPhone users put far more stress on AT&T’s network, driving up their costs. While good for AT&T’s top line, it is not entirely clear that it was good for their bottom line. The cellular industry adopted so-called “friends and family” plans as a way to retain customers (reduce “churn”). These pricing plans offer reduced monthly rates for keeping several phones active with the same carrier. They also eliminate per-minute charges for calls to selected phone numbers, and, more important, to any cell phone served by the same carrier. The larger the user base of a carrier offering a “friends and family” plan, the better the economics turn out for both the carrier and the customer. The customer benefits from access to more cell phone numbers for which per-minute charges are waived. The carrier benefits from having the contract be “stickier” to more customers: fewer customers are likely to give up the benefits of the family plan by switching to another carrier, thus saving the carrier the marketing costs of acquiring another customer or re-acquiring the same customer. Why is this so important? Because of a dirty little secret of the telecommunications service business: it costs more to market to customers than to handle their calls. Thus, the T-Mobile acquisition by AT&T could be particularly bad for Sprint. Ironically, Sprint was the first large carrier to offer “friends and family” pricing, starting in their long-distance business. If Sprint and T-Mobile combined, the resulting carrier would still be third, but a close third (32% Verizon, 30% AT&T, 29% Sprint/T-Mobile). The carriers would be more closely matched on the criterion that could have the most influence on buying decisions: the number of other users your calling plans could access at reduced rates. Three well matched competitors would be better than two giants, a runt, and a crowd of pygmies, some say. Thus, it is conceivable, although perhaps not likely, that the FCC or DOJ will reject the deal out of hand, giving Sprint another shot. The larger story is that the US cell phone business has matured. It is no longer the wild rush of rapidly advancing technology and raw entrepreneurship in pursuit of new users. To find those conditions, one now has to look to the developing world. And indeed, that’s where most of the innovation is happening. But for the US, we could be headed for an effective duopoly of two giant carriers. Back to the future. The author was a senior officer of AT&T and a member of the Bell Labs Executive Council from 1992 to 1996. He also served on the Board of Directors of Evolving Systems, Inc. , a supplier of telecommunications software, from 2005 to 2011.

Read the full article →

InQuira Promotes Nav Chakravarti to Chief Technology Officer

March 22, 2011

Enterprise Knowledge Leader Bolsters Executive Team to Support Its Mission to Deliver a World-Class Customer Experience

Read the full article →

Steve Blank: Inside Stanford’s Hottest Student Startups: Class 2

March 16, 2011

Our new Stanford Lean LaunchPad class was an experiment in a new model of teaching startup entrepreneurship. This post is part two. Part one is here . The class syllabus is here . We asked each of the student teams to: Write down their initial hypotheses for the 9 components of their company’s business model (Who are the customers? What’s the product? What’s the value proposition, distribution channel? etc.) Come up with ways to test each of the 9 business model hypotheses Decide what constitutes a pass/fail signal for the test. (At what point would you say that your hypothesis wasn’t even close to correct?) Consider if the business is worth pursuing? (Give us an estimate of market size) Start the team’s blog/wiki/journal to record their progress during for the class Autonomow Personal Libraries proposed to help researchers manage, share and reference the thousands of papers in their personal libraries. “We increase a researcher’s productivity with a personal reference management system that eliminates tedious tasks associated with discovering, organizing and citing their industry readings,” wrote the team. What was unique about this team was that Xu Cui , a Stanford postdoc in Neuroscience, had built the product to use for his own research. By the time he joined the class, the product was being used in over a hundred research organizations including Stanford, Harvard, Pfizer, the National Institute of Health and Peking University. The problem is that the product was free for end users and few Research institutions purchased site licenses. The goal was to figure out whether this product could become a company. The Personal Libraries initial hypotheses were: We solve enough pain for researchers to drive purchase Dollar size of deals is sufficient to be profitable with direct sales strategy The market is large enough for a scalable business Our feedback was that “free” and “researchers in universities” was often the null set for a profitable business. To see the slide, click here . Agora Cloud Services The D.C. Veritas team was going to build a new type of Wind Turbine – a Vertical Axis Wind Turbine that could fit in the backyard of houses across the U.S. They wanted to offer low cost, residential wind turbine which average Americans can afford. They wanted to provide a renewable source of energy at affordable price. The D.C. Veritas initial core hypotheses were: Not just a product, a complete service (installation, rebates, finance when necessary) Reduce the manufacturing cost. Cool and Sustainable symbol (“Prius” status) The Week 2 Lecture: Value Proposition
 Our working thesis was not one we shared with the class. We proposed to teach entrepreneurship the way you would teach artists: deep theory coupled with hands-on experience, guided by seasoned, accomplished artists. Our lecture this week covered Value Proposition — what problem will the customer pay you to solve? What is the product and service you were offering the customer to solve that problem? To see the slides, click here . Next week, each team tests their value proposition hypotheses (their product/service) and reports the results of face-to-face customer discovery. Stay tuned.

Read the full article →

Dorie Clark: Why Your Brand Must Be an Experience

March 1, 2011

Last year, I traveled to Madrid and was regaled with tales of its paella, sangria, and tapas. But… the Thai food? In fact, it didn’t come to the Spanish capital until 1995, when the small, high-end chain Thai Gardens opened. (They also boast international outposts in Mexico and Brazil). Jonesing for tofu pad thai, I stumbled onto a marketing lesson more American businesses should apply. Branding strategist Martin Lindstrom reports that 83% of commercial communication appeals only to our eyes, yet a full “75% of our day-to-day emotions are influenced by what we smell” and “there’s a 65% chance of a mood change when exposed to a positive sound.” As marketers, we’re leaving an embarrassing amount of money on the table by ignoring the full sensory experience of how customers experience our brands. Most Thai restaurants I’ve visited in the U.S. range from “hole in the wall” to “pretty nice” — a spectrum seemingly determined by the presence or absence of wall hangings, throw pillows and the like (my local favorite has a three-dimensional wooden elephant glued to the cover of their menu). The food can be amazing at any of them. But in most parts of the country, the customer experience — and the prices charged — are rarely top-of-the-line. Thai Gardens, however — located in a country not particularly known for a robust Asian subculture — has staked out the high end with panache. There are the obligatory golden Buddhas. But also dramatic lighting, from dimmed overhead lights to candles and inlaid artwork on the walls, illuminated from above. Rough-hewn stone pillars and copious wood, evocative of a temple. And — just a whiff as you enter the threshold — incense. Aside from stoners and Catholic priests, most Americans neglect it in our everyday lives — so when it’s deployed, it’s powerful. Otherworldly. An experience outside the norm. Something special. And isn’t that worth a few dollars more on your spring rolls? For too many companies, “branding” means a logo and a tagline — period. But that’s only the tip of the iceberg. The real definition of branding is every single way you communicate with your customers, from how you answer the reservations line to the mint at the end of the meal. Your brand — the essence of what you want to communicate to buyers and potential buyers — should permeate everything you do. Incense and well-lit Buddhas may not be the secret for your business. But we can all learn from Thai Gardens and ask ourselves: How do we create a brand that immerses our clients fully? The more powerfully we create a unique experience, the stronger our customer relationships will be. What are your best strategies for creating a powerful brand experience? Dorie Clark is a marketing strategy consultant for clients including Google, Yale University, and the National Park Service. Visit her website , listen to her podcasts or follow her on Twitter .

Read the full article →

Ernan Roman: Relationship Marketing Innovators: 5 Best Practices at Threadless.com

February 28, 2011

THE PROBLEM: How do you transform your organization’s relationships with customers? How do you get them to see your organization as a gathering-place, a destination for constructive interaction with others? We discussed these questions with Tom Ryan, CEO of the community-driven on-line apparel retailer Threadless.com. THE SOLUTION: Implement Threadless’ Five Relationship Marketing Best Practices. Threadless sells tee shirts in very large numbers to a fanatically loyal on-line community. The art for the tee shirts is sourced from a worldwide community of artists and designers. Once the art is submitted, the community of over 1.4 million registered users cast their votes, which helps management decide which designs go on to become Threadless tee shirts. Per the Sloan Management Review: 95% of those purchasing from Threadless.com have voted and posted comments, before making a purchase. Each of CEO Tom Ryan’s five principles is a potential game-changer. When implemented as part of your organization’s overall strategic plan (not just the marketing plan), his five ideas will transform your organization from a transaction-driven enterprise to a relationship-driven one. BEST PRACTICE #1. Funnel passion. “Accept that great ideas can come from anywhere,” Ryan advises, “either from employees within the company or from customers and fans outside the company. We believe that passion and ownership over an idea are the most critical factors to making it successful. Is your organization set up to capture and funnel passions? Or do you have to pitch up from corporate layer to corporate layer to get an idea cleared?” BEST PRACTICE #2. Make marketing a conversation — and don’t take yourself too seriously. In other words, skip the hard sell — or any sell — when using social media tools to interact with your community. As Ryan observes: “It’s very common for marketers to think of consumers who use social media tools as having grabbed hold of a huge megaphone. Marketers then try to grab that megaphone back, and use it as a broadcast tool so they can sell very large groups of customers. It’s more useful to think of social tools as being like a telephone line, something you use to reach out to connect meaningfully with one person at a time.” BEST PRACTICE #3. Make your product your marketing. Look constantly for ways to make your product or service interesting enough for people to talk about to others. Ryan notes: “We like to think of our shirts and designs as entertainment content, as stuff that is so interesting that it starts new conversations and attracts good word-of-mouth on its own.” BEST PRACTICE #4. Empower your customer — usually the benefits outweigh the risks. Ryan says, “we include our community in virtually all aspects of our business”. They submit the designs, they vote on them, they critique them, and they buy the products. As a result, they have a vested interest and a sense of ownership in what the company does. BEST PRACTICE #5. Act human. Authenticity, Ryan warns, is non-negotiable for today’s marketers. “It’s about treating your customers as you’d want to be treated. In keeping with that, we let folks at Threadless speak to customers in a voice that is truly theirs, but also represents the company.” Try This: Implement all five of Threadless’s best practices. Turn your customers into a community — and engage them to participate in many aspects of your company’s operations, including product and service development. This change will carry two transformational benefits: First, the quality of your understanding of your customers’ needs and expectations will increase exponentially. And second, customers will change how they view your company. They will shift from viewing you as a “supplier” of products/services to a company that offers relevance, personality and (yes) friends with whom they choose to communicate over time! Ernan Roman is President of the marketing consultancy, Ernan Roman Direct Marketing. Recognized as the industry pioneer who created three transformational methodologies: Integrated Direct Marketing, Opt-In Marketing, and Voice of Customer Relationship Research. Clients include Microsoft, NBC Universal, Disney, Hewlett-Packard and IBM. Ernan was named to “B to B’s Who’s Who” as one of the “100 most influential people” in Business Marketing by Crain’s B to B Magazine. His latest book on marketing best practices was published in October, 2010, and is titled: Voice of the Customer Marketing: A Proven 5-Step Process to Create Customers Who Care, Spend, and Stay . Ernan is also the co-author of “Opt-In Marketing: Increase Sales Exponentially with Consensual Marketing” and author of “Integrated Direct Marketing: The Cutting Edge Strategy for Synchronizing Advertising, Direct Mail, Telemarketing and Field Sales.” www.erdm.com ernan@erdm.com

Read the full article →

Ernan Roman: Why Is Opting Out of Online Tracking My Problem?

February 21, 2011

Most Web users are surprised, and then alarmed, when they realize how closely marketers scrutinize their online activities. That alarm has triggered a new and powerful consumer privacy movement, one that has led to an impassioned national debate : Should marketers be able to track consumer’s online behavior without explicit permission from the people they are tracking? I believe that this debate is focused on the wrong question. The real issue is not whether we, as marketers, should give consumers the opportunity to “opt-out” of tracking technology that monitors their actions. The Do Not Track movement reflects not merely a policy question, but rather a turning point in the evolution of the Internet. It is a seismic shift that will leave some companies on the proverbial “ash heap of history.” If we hope to survive and thrive in today’s market environment, where consumers have more power than at any time in human history, the question we really should be asking is this: What should marketers do to motivate consumers to make a conscious decision to “opt-in”? We should not place the burden on consumers to “opt-out” of activities they may consider intrusive. We, as marketers, should assume the burden of developing compelling value propositions regarding the many benefits of behavioral tracking and, as a result, engage business and consumer decision makers to opt-in. In this age of empowered, social media savvy consumers, it is our responsibility to create marketing that motivates consumers to engage at a deeper level with us, based on the value we can provide. We need to create a Reciprocity of Value equation whereby consumers can trust us to deliver a more personalized online and offline customer experience based on the additional information they opt-in to share with us. That is the essence of an opt-in relationship. Of course, some marketers have raised concerns about the possibility that significant numbers of consumers won’t opt-in. I don’t share this concern. I am confident that today’s legitimate marketers have the creativity to effectively communicate the myriad benefits of behavioral tracking and drive large numbers of opt-ins. S olid brands don’t have trouble building strong Twitter or Facebook followings, why should they have trouble getting people to opt-in? Based on extensive experience, we know that people who actively choose to opt-in will provide rich information regarding their preferences. This detailed customer generated information enables marketers to provide targeted and relevant communications and offers as determined by the individual preferences of consumers. This is a major win for consumers and marketers. Results from over 100 Voice of Customer relationship research efforts we have conducted for companies such as Microsoft, NBC Universal, IBM, and many Growth companies, indicates that there are five criteria consumers have as they evaluate whether to opt-in to sharing in-depth information with a marketer. They are: Consumers have to trust that the company will adequately safeguard their information and use it in a responsible way. “Responsible” means that consumers must believe that their information will not be rented or sold to third parties. “Honor my preferences” reflects the expectation that their “opt-in” self-profiled preferences will be used to drive increasingly targeted communications and offers… and suppress those that are not relevant per the expressed preferences of individual customers. The value consumers receive in exchange for providing in-depth information must be obvious and compelling. To overcome the legacy of receiving untargeted and irrelevant communications, consumers must see an obvious improvement in relevance. This expectation of relevance applies both to their online experience and subsequent email, direct mail, etc. If the value is not obvious, consumers will assume you have betrayed their trust and expectations. Consumers must see proof that the company will be able to deliver on requirements 1 through 4 above, not just once, but consistently over time. Whatever form the Do-Not-Track regulations finally take, I predict that the marketers who survive and thrive will be those of us who consistently meet the five requirements above. I am confident that marketers today have the skill and creativity to communicate the compelling value they can provide to consumers who don’t merely decline to opt-out, but actively choose to opt-in. Ernan Roman is President of the marketing consultancy, Ernan Roman Direct Marketing. Recognized as the industry pioneer who created three transformational methodologies: Integrated Direct Marketing, Opt-In Marketing, and Voice of Customer Relationship Research. Clients include Microsoft, NBC Universal, Disney, Hewlett-Packard and IBM. Ernan was named to “B to B’s Who’s Who” as one of the “100 most influential people” in Business Marketing by Crain’s B to B Magazine. His latest book on marketing best practices was published in October, 2010, and is titled: Voice of the Customer Marketing: A Proven 5-Step Process to Create Customers Who Care, Spend, and Stay . Ernan is also the co-author of “Opt-In Marketing: Increase Sales Exponentially with Consensual Marketing” and author of “Integrated Direct Marketing: The Cutting Edge Strategy for Synchronizing Advertising, Direct Mail, Telemarketing and Field Sales.” www.erdm.com ernan@erdm.com

Read the full article →

Nicholas Carroll: The Broken Covenant Between Rich and Middle Class

February 15, 2011

Henry Ford did not invent the middle class; it had been around a long time in the form of artisans and shop-keepers. Nor did Ford single-handedly drive the expansion of the American middle class; the Industrial Revolution was already doing that. What Ford did accomplish on January 5th, 1914 — when he unilaterally raised workers’ salaries from a minimum of $2.34 a day to $5 a day — was to hugely undermine the tradition of industrial worker exploitation embraced by the robber barons of the late 1800s. He had several reasons, reducing employee turnover being one of them, but the Earth-shaker was, “So they can afford to buy my cars.” Ford wanted more customers, and to get them he needed a bigger pool of Americans with discretionary income: that group called “the middle class.” To get that — in a leap of thought — he was willing to reduce worker exploitation to sell more cars. Coming from a noted union-hater, Ford’s action and reasoning crystallized a new concept in the distribution of wealth, a concept that would have lacked the same credibility coming from workers or unions. In fact it was so radical that one commentator observed even the Wobblies were momentarily stunned into silence. It wouldn’t last long. In 1929, the combination of financial fraud and folly knocked the workers back into the mud, putting a temporary end to the growth of the middle class. Whether Federal intervention or World War II (or neither) ended the Great Depression is a moot point; what WWII did do, we are assured by people who lived through it, was “pull the country together” in a way that had not been seen before or since. Out of that heady atmosphere of cooperation and technical advance came streamlined cars, air conditioning, television, a housing boom, and the GI Bill sending blue-collar workers off to college in unprecedented numbers. By the mid-1950s, Ford’s personal dream was realized, because there were a hell of a lot of Americans who could afford to buy a car. The radical idea Ford articulated had become a covenant — and there was so much new wealth that the rich hardly seemed to object that much of it was going to the growing middle class. Where the slide started is arguable. If it didn’t start with the war in Vietnam, it unquestionably did by the early 1980s, when big business received both tacit and blatant messages from Washington that they could flout Federal regulations with relative impunity. At the same time there were increases in manufacturing and wholesaling efficiency, more outsourcing of work offshore (now called “globalization”), and the probably-unexpected bonus that women entering the workforce would allow businesses to pay everyone less. The covenant was eroding, and by the mid-1980s the middle class was beginning to need two incomes per family to stay middle class. So one could point the finger at the manufacturing sector for beginning to chew away at the gains of the middle class. But it would be Big Finance that was destined to bring us to the Great Recession, leading off with the 1980s Wall Street “bonfire of the vanities,” hitting the news with the fall of Drexel Burnham , and creating the first widespread bank crisis since the Great Depression in the form of the late 1980s savings and loan crisis. With too few executives going to jail in the S&L crisis, the financial sector retained its chutzpah, and opened the road to ruin in 1999 by lobbying through the gutting of the 1933 Glass-Steagall Act — a law that among other things limited the relationship between Big Finance and local banking. It is worth a brief detour here to consider the fundamental difference between producers and financial people. Producers need customers who buy goods and services. Financial people don’t, exactly; they live on taking a slice of transactions between producers and customers. One might call a mortgage a real product, but it’s not — it’s an enabler to the real transaction, the real transaction being where the producer (home builder) sells a home to the customer. Psychologically this means there is a huge gulf between producer and financier. The first produces or delivers a more-or-less real thing for real people. The latter takes a slice of the financial pie as it flies by; the psychology is all “take” and no “make.” (And local banking stands somewhere in between — not exactly producing, but providing some services of actual value such as checking accounts.) This is not to suggest that producers are without sin. A day never passes without news of tainted food, poisoned water, phony shortages, exploding cars, or carcinogenic drugs. Likewise there is no hard-and-fast line between business models. Automakers have become hugely dependent on financing. Major telephone companies and cable networks seem to focus more on selling contracts than providing service. But at the end of the day, good or bad product, sterling or shoddy service, the producer has to sell their product or service, or they go bankrupt. Further, they have a limited market to sell it to. Shoe companies with $100 sports shoes cannot sell them in the Third World; they need customers with $100 in discretionary income. Producers are also more accountable. Ford Motor Co. is by most reckoning on track towards a level of reliability that rivals Honda — but they have to sell those cars to an audience where some are old enough to remember Ford Pintos exploding into flames when rear-ended. Telcos stand tall in their arrogance towards customers, yet AT&T has become known for inferior cellular connections, and they are paying the price as customers ranging from individual consumers to Apple Computer vote with their feet. Big Finance is more fluid than producers in its “product packaging,” as Wall Street demonstrated by selling the worthless dregs of subprime mortgages (ersatz goods) not only to Deutsche Bank, but to the investment funds of small Norwegian towns. Big Finance is also more nimble. While Wall Street financiers don’t have the physical mobility of boiler-room online fraud operations, they don’t have factories tying them down either. The executive who can no longer find buyers for CDOs can freely move into selling bison ranching shares or tulip bulb futures to buyers from Kansas to Kenya. The bottom line is that by any sane person’s reckoning, the question “Who caused the Great Recession?” leads to the financial sector — and the certainty that, left to themselves, the financial sector will “do it again” — and again and again, leaving nothing of the covenant that “the rich shall allow the middle class a passably decent lifestyle.” So regardless of their individual politics, middle class Americans who want to remain middle class should make note of the fundamental difference between producers and big finance, and accept — or insist — that Big Finance once again be closely regulated at the Federal level. Because no matter how it is packaged, the combination of deregulation and lax regulation means “no rules” for Big Finance — and that doesn’t bode well for the remnants of the middle class.

Read the full article →

Nicholas Carroll: The Broken Covenant Between Rich and Middle Class

February 15, 2011

Henry Ford did not invent the middle class; it had been around a long time in the form of artisans and shop-keepers. Nor did Ford single-handedly drive the expansion of the American middle class; the Industrial Revolution was already doing that. What Ford did accomplish on January 5th, 1914 — when he unilaterally raised workers’ salaries from a minimum of $2.34 a day to $5 a day — was to hugely undermine the tradition of industrial worker exploitation embraced by the robber barons of the late 1800s. He had several reasons, reducing employee turnover being one of them, but the Earth-shaker was, “So they can afford to buy my cars.” Ford wanted more customers, and to get them he needed a bigger pool of Americans with discretionary income: that group called “the middle class.” To get that — in a leap of thought — he was willing to reduce worker exploitation to sell more cars. Coming from a noted union-hater, Ford’s action and reasoning crystallized a new concept in the distribution of wealth, a concept that would have lacked the same credibility coming from workers or unions. In fact it was so radical that one commentator observed even the Wobblies were momentarily stunned into silence. It wouldn’t last long. In 1929, the combination of financial fraud and folly knocked the workers back into the mud, putting a temporary end to the growth of the middle class. Whether Federal intervention or World War II (or neither) ended the Great Depression is a moot point; what WWII did do, we are assured by people who lived through it, was “pull the country together” in a way that had not been seen before or since. Out of that heady atmosphere of cooperation and technical advance came streamlined cars, air conditioning, television, a housing boom, and the GI Bill sending blue-collar workers off to college in unprecedented numbers. By the mid-1950s, Ford’s personal dream was realized, because there were a hell of a lot of Americans who could afford to buy a car. The radical idea Ford articulated had become a covenant — and there was so much new wealth that the rich hardly seemed to object that much of it was going to the growing middle class. Where the slide started is arguable. If it didn’t start with the war in Vietnam, it unquestionably did by the early 1980s, when big business received both tacit and blatant messages from Washington that they could flout Federal regulations with relative impunity. At the same time there were increases in manufacturing and wholesaling efficiency, more outsourcing of work offshore (now called “globalization”), and the probably-unexpected bonus that women entering the workforce would allow businesses to pay everyone less. The covenant was eroding, and by the mid-1980s the middle class was beginning to need two incomes per family to stay middle class. So one could point the finger at the manufacturing sector for beginning to chew away at the gains of the middle class. But it would be Big Finance that was destined to bring us to the Great Recession, leading off with the 1980s Wall Street “bonfire of the vanities,” hitting the news with the fall of Drexel Burnham , and creating the first widespread bank crisis since the Great Depression in the form of the late 1980s savings and loan crisis. With too few executives going to jail in the S&L crisis, the financial sector retained its chutzpah, and opened the road to ruin in 1999 by lobbying through the gutting of the 1933 Glass-Steagall Act — a law that among other things limited the relationship between Big Finance and local banking. It is worth a brief detour here to consider the fundamental difference between producers and financial people. Producers need customers who buy goods and services. Financial people don’t, exactly; they live on taking a slice of transactions between producers and customers. One might call a mortgage a real product, but it’s not — it’s an enabler to the real transaction, the real transaction being where the producer (home builder) sells a home to the customer. Psychologically this means there is a huge gulf between producer and financier. The first produces or delivers a more-or-less real thing for real people. The latter takes a slice of the financial pie as it flies by; the psychology is all “take” and no “make.” (And local banking stands somewhere in between — not exactly producing, but providing some services of actual value such as checking accounts.) This is not to suggest that producers are without sin. A day never passes without news of tainted food, poisoned water, phony shortages, exploding cars, or carcinogenic drugs. Likewise there is no hard-and-fast line between business models. Automakers have become hugely dependent on financing. Major telephone companies and cable networks seem to focus more on selling contracts than providing service. But at the end of the day, good or bad product, sterling or shoddy service, the producer has to sell their product or service, or they go bankrupt. Further, they have a limited market to sell it to. Shoe companies with $100 sports shoes cannot sell them in the Third World; they need customers with $100 in discretionary income. Producers are also more accountable. Ford Motor Co. is by most reckoning on track towards a level of reliability that rivals Honda — but they have to sell those cars to an audience where some are old enough to remember Ford Pintos exploding into flames when rear-ended. Telcos stand tall in their arrogance towards customers, yet AT&T has become known for inferior cellular connections, and they are paying the price as customers ranging from individual consumers to Apple Computer vote with their feet. Big Finance is more fluid than producers in its “product packaging,” as Wall Street demonstrated by selling the worthless dregs of subprime mortgages (ersatz goods) not only to Deutsche Bank, but to the investment funds of small Norwegian towns. Big Finance is also more nimble. While Wall Street financiers don’t have the physical mobility of boiler-room online fraud operations, they don’t have factories tying them down either. The executive who can no longer find buyers for CDOs can freely move into selling bison ranching shares or tulip bulb futures to buyers from Kansas to Kenya. The bottom line is that by any sane person’s reckoning, the question “Who caused the Great Recession?” leads to the financial sector — and the certainty that, left to themselves, the financial sector will “do it again” — and again and again, leaving nothing of the covenant that “the rich shall allow the middle class a passably decent lifestyle.” So regardless of their individual politics, middle class Americans who want to remain middle class should make note of the fundamental difference between producers and big finance, and accept — or insist — that Big Finance once again be closely regulated at the Federal level. Because no matter how it is packaged, the combination of deregulation and lax regulation means “no rules” for Big Finance — and that doesn’t bode well for the remnants of the middle class.

Read the full article →

EarthLite(R) Announces Addition of New Vice President of Sales and Customer Service to Its Executive Team

February 9, 2011

VISTA, CA–(Marketwire – February 9, 2011) – EarthLite ( www.earthlite.com ) (EL) the premier brand in professional massage equipment, announces the addition of Melissa Mao as VP of Sales and Customer Service based in its corporate headquarters in Vista, California.

Read the full article →

Airfares On The Rise As Airlines Charge Passengers For Fuel

February 8, 2011

NEW YORK — The rising cost of flying comes with a familiar refrain: The airlines need help paying their fuel bills. For the first time since late 2008, U.S. airlines are adding fuel surcharges to ticket prices. They’ve already raised fares five times since December.to offset a 25 percent increase in the price of jet fuel. For those with spring and summer travel plans, it’s a one-two punch. Right now, the surcharges on U.S. routes are only between $3 and $5 each way. Back in 2008, surcharges started slightly higher, then jumped as high as $60 when oil hit $147 in the summer. Many estimates have oil moving slightly above $100 this year. Even a one-way $15 surcharge adds more than 4 percent to the average domestic ticket price of about $340. And on international flights, fuel surcharges at their peak can more than double the price of a ticket. _ Adding fuel to the fare American Airlines last week added a fuel surcharge of about $5 each way on most U.S. routes. United and Continental applied a charge of $3 each way. Others are expected to follow. JetBlue tacked on $35 to $45 for trips to the Caribbean and Puerto Rico. Besides raising fares system-wide, individual airlines are hiking fares further on popular routes. That helps boost revenue, but airlines aren’t sure it’s enough. Airlines generally expect to pay at least 15 to 25 percent more for fuel this year. Estimates vary because carriers use different financial strategies for rising fuel prices. Oil topped $92 per barrel last week, the highest level since October 2008. _ Where (and why) you’ll find them Fuel surcharges are traditionally an easier way to raise fares. An increase to a base fare isn’t always tolerated by customers. They can switch to a rival or force an airline to lower fares again to keep them. Fees are complicated and can drive passengers away, too. Airlines also believe passengers are more forgiving of price increases for specific reasons. “I think our customer understands fuel surcharges because they see their energy costs rising as well,” JetBlue Dave Barger said in an interview with The Associated Press. _ Now you see them. Surcharges are wrapped into the base fare on U.S. flights – you won’t incur a separate fee at booking. And they must appear in all promotions and advertisements. But on international flights fuel surcharges are often hidden during an initial fare search on online travel sites and the airlines’ own websites. They can exceed the ticket price. Surcharges for international flights reached $350 on a trip to Europe in 2008. They dropped, but never went away like domestic charges did in the recession. Fuel surcharges are labeled with an “F” code on your final booking statement of airfare and taxes. Peak travel day surcharges, which airlines introduced soon after domestic fuel fees disappeared, have a “Q” code. It’s unclear whether travelers will incur both fees this summer. _ More to come? Few airline executives expect costs to drop this year, so travelers should prepare for higher fuel surcharges. Southwest CEO Gary Kelly said fuel will be the airline’s biggest hurdle to staying profitable this year. Fuel is often an airline’s biggest expense next to labor. It accounts for about one-third of an airline’s total costs, on average, according to the International Air Transport Association. Rick Seaney of FareCompare.com predicts airlines will apply fuel surcharges much more slowly this year to avoid the resistance they encountered two and a half years ago. But that’s not to say airlines wouldn’t raise fuel surcharges higher than in 2008. With the economy growing and more people flying, analysts suggest that fares and fees should climb steadily this year. “They’ll keep rising until the point where the consumer says `I’m not buying a ticket anymore,’” Seaney said.

Read the full article →

Penny Herscher: White-Collar Americans Are Guilty Until Proven Innocent

February 4, 2011

Americans have a legal right to be presumed innocent until proven guilty, and yet for white-collar workers, that’s nice in theory but simply not the case in practice. I am CEO of a California software company and saw this issue up close a few days ago. We are hiring right now. My team and I follow a rigorous hiring process — screen resumes, look for experience fit, interview on the phone, interview in person, discuss the candidate as a team, reference check and then hire. We look for skills, experience and values — will the candidate be a great fit for our open position and our company? Will they be successful working with us? I have been interviewing candidates over the past month and was sent the resume of an individual currently charged in the active New York insider trading case . NY prosecutors have charged six employees of high-tech firms and the expert network service Primary Global Research with leaking and profiting from sharing insider information with hedge funds. The state is proceeding against both high-tech insiders who allegedly leaked confidential information — like Walter Shimoon from Flextronics — and the conduit of the information to the hedge funds like PGR employee James Fleishman . And today the SEC piled on with additional charges of insider trading. My candidate was one of the six accused individuals. He had an excellent experience fit for the position we have open and, because he was a qualified candidate, and I believe everyone is innocent until proven guilty, I explored the next step and consulted with my lawyers at Wilson Sonsini on the risks of bringing him in for interview and potentially hiring him. Bottom line — it’s not practical to hire someone in a customer-facing position who is facing criminal charges. My lawyer’s advice was pragmatic: The individual won’t be available 100 percent of the time to do the job. If you live and work in California, but you are being prosecuted in New York, you are going to have to take time out to travel, stand in court and defend your liberty. That’s going to be more important than any job. They’ll be distracted. Successful sales takes 1,000 percent focus, especially in this economy just emerging from a recession. You can’t afford to be distracted by anything. If the employee fights for their innocence they’ll be fighting for months or years — if they plead guilty and cooperate with the state in order to reduce their sentence or not serve any time then they are a convicted felon. And the toughest reason for a CEO to hear: Your company will be painted with their tainted brush if you put that person in a customer facing position. This is because you would have knowingly hired someone the government has stated is fraudulent — and if a customer has a dispute with your company that fact will hurt your defense. Your company will be presumed to be OK with fraud and on the defensive as a result. If we, as a business community, truly believed each person is innocent until proven guilty, then our customer base would be fine with us hiring someone under indictment, but my lawyers were right to advise me as they did. I checked. Most customers would not want to work with someone under indictment — it would be uncomfortable for them, and my company would be tainted. Most customers (and employees) would doubt and assume there is compelling evidence or the government would not have charged the candidate. I find myself terribly conflicted in the situation. I’m a CEO with a responsibility to my company and my employees, and yet I am a private citizen with faith in the law. I did not proceed with the candidate because I recognize that the law is our culture’s minimum moral standard, not the maximum, and so as a CEO I had to make a gray-area judgment that I did not like. The harsh reality for white-collar workers is that ” doubt is as powerful a bond as uncertainty ,” and in our current business climate, if accused by the State, they are at a practical level guilty until proven innocent.

Read the full article →

Brett King: Let’s Get Rid of Internet Banking

February 2, 2011

If you think about the way we have digital banking and web presence structured today, it is actually wrong. Most banks today already have a well developed ‘public’ presence in the form of www site, and a separate ‘secure’ portal as a transaction or services platform “behind the login” — normally called “Internet Banking.” The problem is, that this basic structure is not the optimal configuration for customers, nor for the bank moving forward. Why is it so? Largely the reason for separating public website and internet banking comes down to historical elements. The major driver is purely evolution of two separate platforms. While there had been early attempts at some sort of transactional platform for banking through dedicated networks, these largely failed until the internet provided a common infrastructure for simple online access to services. While transactional banking was an obvious fit to the IP world, when the internet emerged commercially it was more about brochureware — and thus the content was less about functionality and more about marketing and sales. Thus emerged two disparate platforms — one was functional or transactional technology, and the other was about revenue and sales. Traditionally speaking the “dot com” presence was owned by the marketing, or in some misguided cases corporate communications who mistook the home page as a staging ground for press releases and investor relations messages. Internet Banking, however, being largely about a front-end to transactional services (such as viewing a statement, getting account balances, transferring funds and paying bills) was driven by the IT teams who were in charge of integrating the browser with the bank core systems through some sort of middleware. To this day, these teams just don’t understand each other, so the hope that one day public and secure web presence could work together, is hard to visualize. The Biggest Revenue is Behind the Login The problem with these two separate views of the world, is that it no longer makes sense for the customer. 90% of daily traffic to most bank website goes to the login button, so conceivably your most attractive targets (i.e. existing customers) are ignoring all of the marketing spend on nice sales messages, flashy graphics and landing pages, and they’re going straight through to the tasks they want to complete behind the login. Behind the login, most banks adopt a quite sterile marketing environment, with very limited sales communications, largely focusing on execution. The fact is, based on these analytics, you probably need to be spending at least 90 per cent of your Web marketing budget on building offers and campaigns for existing customers through the Internet banking secure portal, but the IT guys don’t get any of that. The core advantage to selling behind the login is that the acquisition process is dead easy. You already have all the customer information (KYC), so compliance is simply a click-based existing customer acquisition, rather than copious forms or entry to provide proof of who they are, their credit risk assessment, etc. These are simply the easiest customers to convert. However, shifting marketing spend to behind-the-login is not really the answer either. Tomorrow’s web presence will be very different… The future of using IP to connect with customers is understanding that there isn’t and shouldn’t be two separate web-based platforms. The fact is that if you think about content I need everyday from the bank, stuff like my account balance, my transaction history, upcoming payments, etc — this probably doesn’t need to be subject to a full-blown, two-factor authentication model. In most cases, this information could be shown contextually into my banking experience just based on a cookie and ‘remember me’ authentication model (think hotmail.com or Facebook). Marketing journeys could start one of two ways. For example, if I come to your site as a result of a search on mortgages, the homepage needs to respond to your interest in mortgage immediately, along with recognizing if you are an existing customer. For example, if you are an existing customer, you’d see immediately what you are pre-approved for, or if you are an existing mortgage customer then you might see a refinancing option or a competitive offer for bundled home insurance. Much of the content we need is going to be contextual too. So I need you to tell me my credit card balance when I’m on a third-party credit card site, about to use my card, instead of just refusing the transaction because I’m over the limit. I need you to start getting me offers for products and services when and where I need them, not waiting for me to come back to the site or a branch. I need to have a place I can go which centralizes this relationship and defines when and we can work together, what communications I receive from you, and a place where I have a tailored view of my footprint with the bank, etc. So rather than the public site and internet banking, the future looks a little different. The future of the multi-channel content environment will be: The Customer/Bank Dashboard – beyond PFM, this is the relationship control panel Journeys – Product and service engagement opportunities that could start through mobile, search, social, and migrate to acquisition Contextual – Understanding triggers and behaviors as an opportunity to commence a journey Execution – The day-to-day functional stuff such as transferring money, paying bills, etc. Customer Dynamics – Building out the supporting processes, cross-silo metrics, IT Integration, etc This will be distributed across mobile, tablets, desktop, PC, ATM and other interfaces. This is all has the potential to happen within the next 3 years. The thing is – I can guarantee there are at least two department heads who are going to find this transition very difficult to deal with…

Read the full article →

SmartVault Expands Executive Team — Mark Miller Named Vice President of Sales and Support

January 24, 2011

SmartVault Invests in Miller’s Extensive Sales and Customer Support Expertise

Read the full article →

Australian Power And Gas (ASX:APK) Grows Past 200,000 Customer Accounts

January 20, 2011

Australian Power And Gas (ASX:APK) Grows Past 200,000 Customer Accounts

Read the full article →

Barry Moltz: 20 Most Important Words for Your Small Business

January 14, 2011

Words are powerful things. And what they mean has a big influence on your customers’ expectations. It is important in your business to understand and define each term for your company and customers. It will make a big difference in how your company grows. 1. Belief: What people think and accept as true. May not correlate with facts. Have great sticking power, even when they are wrong. 2. Complain: What a customer does when they are unhappy. They complain to themselves, to friends, on the Web, and even sometimes to you. 3. Disney: A place where most customers are always happy. This takes a lot of employee training. 4. Empowerment: Training employees to make decisions on their own to help a customer without talking to “the boss.” 5. Feedback: Giving the customer the opportunity to tell you what they think at many different stages of interaction, and the opportunity to do it in many different ways depending on what is convenient and appropriate for them. Something smart companies listen to and take to heart. Associated with the Three Times Rule–if you hear something about your business three times, whether you like it or not, pay serious attention. It is probably true. 6. Forever: Relative time the customer feels they need to wait. 7. Happy: An impossible dream that is sometimes worth the pursuit. No business strategy in the world can make all customers happy. 8. Humans: Who every customer wants to talk to when they call your company. 9. Kick the Cat: What employees do when they take their frustrations out on the customer. Blowing a situation out of proportion. The kiss of death for a company. 10. Mistake: The hardest thing for the company (or the customer) to admit. 12. My Manager: The person the customer is seemingly always getting passed to or who always gets blamed by the employee if something goes wrong. The catcher in “passing the buck.” 13. Overpromise : Making a commitment to a customer or to all customers that the company is not economically able to keep. 14. Patience : What businesses think customers ought to have. What customers think they have a lot of. 15. Peer Reviews : Online references written by customers on the level of quality or service in your company. Sometimes called an open reputation system. 16. Pest: A customer the company may need to fire to be more profitable. 17. Promise : A solemn commitment to a customer that the company will honor and the customer will not forget. 18. Self Service: Tools such as kiosks and Web tools for customers to assist themselves. Not always linked to satisfaction, but increasingly linked to high expectations of a quick turnaround. 19. Survey: A mostly ineffective means of getting customer feedback, especially when the company bribes the customer to do it. 2 0. Voice Mail Jail : Every customer’s nightmare, especially if they do not get a call back. What important words would you add?

Read the full article →

Video: Johnson Says Storm Won’t Have Big Impact on Retail Sales

December 28, 2010

Dec. 28 (Bloomberg) — Craig Johnson, president of Customer Growth Partners LLC, discusses U.S. retail sales during the holiday season. Johnson speaks with Carol Massar on Bloomberg Television’s “In the Loop.” (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

What You Need To Know About Holiday Return Policies

December 27, 2010

Not all gifts opened this season were welcome ones. For those who unwrapped the fuzzy sweater from Aunt Rita that doesn’t even fit, or the third copy of World of Warcraft, it’s time to head to the return aisle. Before spending an hour in the customer service line, check out WalletPop’s updated list of return policies for some popular, holiday, shopping spots.

Read the full article →

Matt Wilson: Social Media Helps Wall Street Meet Main Street

December 15, 2010

Social media is all the buzz in small business. Everyone has gone to their local mom and pop store and seen that they are using social tools to keep in touch with their clientele. Everyone has seen the Wall Street-backed companies with commercials on television that end in “Follow us on Twitter!”. But what we looked to explore is where Wall Street meets Main Street: franchising. These franchisors are taking their customer service and marketing efforts to social media, directly helping the everyday franchise owner increase their sales on Main Street. Franchisees have the mentality of a small business owner operating in their local community while still having the perks of being backed by a big corporation. Take a look at these eight franchisors who are taking their efforts to social media… Tasti D-Lite “The Grandfather of Interactive Awards” BJ Emerson of Tasti D-lite came up with the revolutionary idea to use social media as currency. They are the first to link such outlets to customer loyalty programs and now other franchises have followed in their footsteps. Regulars of Tasti D-lite probably already use the franchise’s “treatcards,” rewards plan that accumulates points with every purchase. Every 50 points are redeemable for a medium cup or cone. Their media program allows customers to register their “treatcards” online and link them to their social footprints such as Foursquare and Twitter. By doing so, customers will earn double bonus points if they enable the program to automatically update their Twitter and/or Foursquare accounts with every purchase. Website: tastidlite.com Facebook: facebook.com/tastidlite Dunkin’ Donuts “Quality Customer Care through Social Media” Dunkin’ Donuts’ has been hard at work in their social media outreach. Most notable is their interactive website which offers ordering online, store locators and even offer a thorough nutritional chart for their health conscious consumers (very brave). They also have a very popular Facebook page consisting of about a million fans, and Twitter page that garnered 56,000 followers and growing. Their perks leave much to be desired, hence the occasional free iced coffee or delectable treat that will fall on a random occasion such as National Donut Day; however, the franchise focuses on quality customer service by actively responding to their fans’ experiences with the franchise. On any given day, the franchise will make certain to respond the majority of their mentions if not all of them. That may seem basic, but it’s really an extraordinary feat. Think about how many fans lurk by their computers praying to Zeus that today might be the day that @ kimkardashian responds to their tweet. In addition, fans are promised insider information about upcoming products. Website: dunkindonuts.com Facebook: facebook.com/DunkinDonuts Twitter: @ dunkindonuts 7-Eleven “Viral Marketing through Gaming” 7-Eleven hasn’t figured quite yet how to capitalize on social moguls such as Facebook and Twitter, but in this day and age, nothing says viral marketing like an interactive game. 7-11 took this to heart when the convenience store chain launched the online dating game: “Wake Up With a Hot Brazilian,” to promote their newest product, Brazilian Bold coffee. The premise of the game was to enter the hot and heavy “711 club” and work that romantic IQ on the Sims inspired characters lounging around. High scores were redeemable at any franchise for free cups of coffee. Website: 7-eleven.com Facebook: facebook.com/7Eleven Church’s Chicken “Pay it Forward” Franchisor Church’s Chicken launched a campaign deemed “Pay It Forward” where fans were interviewed and asked, “Do you know what good is?” (A play off of their 2007 campaign: ‘I Know What Good Is’) which were all featured in podcasts and video blogs. Church’s Chicken also launched its Twitter account and promised to add one dollar to a pledge fund for each follower they accumulated in a thirty-day period. Church’s Chicken hoped to reach 10,000 so they could give away 1,000 dollars to ten individuals living in urban areas. The winners have yet to be announced. Website: churchs.com Twitter: @ ChurchsChicken Subway “Promoting Healthy Lifestyles on the ‘Net” It has been interesting to watch Subway position itself as not a fast food chain but a fit alternative, aiding many Americans on the pathway to a healthy lifestyle change. Their website hosts a collection of blogs that range from Jared (Subway’s original spokesperson who garnered fame for losing a significant amount of weight, eating nothing but the franchise’s sandwiches) to Olympic gold medalist Michael Phelps. Now they are building their Twitter following by sending out promotional news, interacting with their customers and highlighting their publicity on shows such as, The Biggest Loser. Website: subway.com Facebook: facebook.com/subway Twitter: @ subwayfreshbuzz Hampton Hotels “Learn the best Travel Anywhere” With the recent blows to the economy and families strapping down their boots in anticipation of hard times, hotel franchises such as Hampton Hotels could have the upper hand on boutique hotels if they play their cards right. Hampton Hotels has been increasing its popularity through a hyperactive Twitter page. Followers learn first hand of special rates, promotions, and new locations and have the opportunity to win a free stay if they offer feedback. They also offer tips on traveling, such as saving on airfares and staying healthy on the road. Website: hamptoninn1.hilton.com Twitter: @ hamptonfyi Domino’s Pizza “Monitoring Twitter on Gigantic Computers” Domino’s Pizza has also been working on it customer through Twitter . Their website is impressive and includes a “pizza builder” for online ordering. They also make sure to highlight their customers. Most notable in that area is Ramon De Leon, who manages seven of these franchises in Chicago. His team closely monitors Twitter on four computers for any comments concerning their area and act upon it immediately, depending on the issue. For example, he issued a public apology via both Twitter and video blog to a woman who received the wrong pizza an hour late. He also made sure that she received her order without her even having to ask. He also recorded a video blog to thank another fan that tweeted happily about her order. Website: www.dominos.com Facebook: facebook.com/Dominos Twitter: @ Dominos The Chicago Bulls (just for fun) “WebMD for Future Athletes” The Chicago Bulls have grabbed social media by the metaphorical horns (excuse the pun). The team is actively evolving its website to accommodate a more interactive playground for its fans. Maybe most interesting is their incorporation of Chicago Bull’s “Ask the Docs” where fans can consult the team’s official sports doctors for some tertiary advice. The Bulls also have a Youtube channel named BullsTV . Website: nba.com/bulls Facebook: facebook.com/chicagobulls Twitter: @ chicagobulls

Read the full article →

MIT Entrepreneurship Review: When Should You Think About Price?

December 14, 2010

A few years ago, I worked with a product manager for a medical device company who had a burning question for me. His game-changing product was ready to go, the sales force was lined up and beginning to make contacts with customers, and his CEO was expecting this to be a $100 M product. He now just needed to slap a price on it, and wanted to know what I thought. My response: you should have been thinking about this a long time ago. Pricing is an incredibly important aspect in the success of nearly every business. Yet somewhere in the commotion of building their enterprise, an entrepreneur often lets it slip through the cracks. Sooner or later (usually later, unfortunately) my medical device client’s question will pop up: “When should I start to think about price?” The answer is that if you have a business plan, a potential customer, a prototype, or anything beyond an idea on a napkin, you should already be thinking a lot about price. Generally speaking, if you find yourself asking that question, you are probably already late and need to start catching up. Over the next few months, we will dig into best practices and useful techniques to drive more profitable revenue in your business. However, we need to first examine the urgency of thinking about price early and often. For starters, price is one of the most effective levers a manager can pull to drive profits. But to effectively do so over the long-term, it cannot be a one-time decision. Pricing is a mindset that needs to be integrated throughout the entire lifecycle of your product and must infiltrate every functional area of your business. Effective pricing is driven by the value you are able to deliver to your customers. Managers must constantly assess this value and look for ways to increase it. In many cases, it is an economic value (e.g., labor savings, access to a new customer segment). This is most common in B2B markets. Sometimes there is a psychological value delivered (e.g., a “coolness” factor of a new gadget), which is often a factor in consumer markets. But to capture this value, to truly monetize your new business, you need to be thinking about price at all stages of the game. Launching Your Business This mindset is particularly necessary for entrepreneurs. When developing a business model or drafting your business plan, price (and accordingly, value) needs to be at the top of your mind. Why would anyone pay me for this? What are they getting? How will this specifically help to improve a company’s financial position? What are my customers using now (the next best competitive alternative, to be discussed more in a future article on quantifying value) and how is my solution better? Thinking about these questions from the moment of your business’s inception will ensure you are driving toward a profitable outcome — one where you are going to truly deliver value that the market will pay for. Remember that you are starting the business to make money, not to make stuff. The challenge for entrepreneurs is to succeed in this task by doing more with less. But the “less” comes through higher efficiency — a greater degree of focus in your actions — not through simply doing fewer things (or worse, just doing everything 50 percent of the way). Focusing on price at the planning stage and throughout the company’s lifecycle will help you keep your eye on the prize, and ensure you are spending your limited resources in the right areas — the ones that return the most money. So when you think about launching a new business, think about price. Launching New Products and Services All too often, the end goal of driving value is forgotten in the chase to make stuff. As the product begins to take shape, new features are added daily. Wouldn’t it be cool if we had an extra flashing light? It wouldn’t be hard to make the product function as a toaster, too, so let’s add that. The result of this product-centric process is a lot of time and money spent developing a more costly product that doesn’t deliver any more value to the market. When the product launches with the inevitably higher price required to cover the additional features, no one buys it, as the value delivered does not merit the high price. The product development and launch processes need to be done with price at the forefront. Will adding this feature allow us to capture higher profitability? Why? What is the value that the new feature delivers — is it a totally new value driver, or does it just increase the impact of the original value driver? Is this the most important value driver to my customer, or the 10th most important? Are the same customers interested in both of these value drivers? As an entrepreneur, your time and resources are stretched thin. Focus on developing your products in a way that creates the biggest impact on the most important value drivers. When you think about developing and launching your product, think about price. Finding and Meeting Customers Have you ever met with a potential customer, even just in exploratory conversations, having not given serious consideration to price? If so, fear not; you’re not alone. Entrepreneurs can easily get caught up with other aspects of the business and think that it’s not the “right time” to think about price. But what happens? A potential customer eventually asks, and you don’t have the answer. Do you throw out a number? Marginal cost plus 10 points? The first price mentioned to a customer, even if informally, creates a very powerful reference point. What you do today affects what your world looks like tomorrow. Pricing decisions are not made in a vacuum, and will not magically reset a year down the road when you’re ready to get into the black. Once a reference price is set, you’ve given customers an anchor that they will not quickly forget. Dramatic moves away from this initial price will not lead to pleasant conversations. What would your best customer say when you tell him or her that the price is about to double? And if you cut price in half, customers may wonder if you were being “fair” initially, or perhaps that the price is falling because no one is buying (and they can therefore get even further discounts). Instead, use these early conversations as a source of information to further develop your pricing decisions and understand how you can deliver value. Before you show up, do your research. Read a 10-K and find a line where you think you can have impact. Are you trying to impact a $1 million cost bucket, or a $500 million cost bucket? If a customer is focused on reducing costs, realize that a revenue driver may not be as attractive to them. Is there a better way to frame your value story? Talk specifically about how they would use the product in their company — what processes, divisions, people and financial line items would be affected. What are the most attractive aspects of this product and why? Don’t assume you know the answer — ask the question. Ask what could be done to improve the value of the product. When you are talking with customers, you need to be thinking about price. The “Right Time” for Pricing Thinking back to my medical device client and his innovative $100 million product, a major opportunity to drive profitability was lost by waiting until the 11th hour to think about price. After a few months of hard work using some of the strategies and tactics that we will discuss here in the coming months, the product launched at a price over ten times that of the current market leader and has been very successful. Even so, money was lost by not infusing price into the development process. For example, early stage consideration may have led them to develop studies to validate his performance claims, increase the speed of revenue growth and perhaps open additional segments in the short term. Who is to say it couldn’t have been a $500 million product? For all the reasons discussed here, the right time to think about pricing is now . Companies are by and large rational decision makers. They will buy when they get something in return that is greater than the opportunity cost. Understand why buying your product is a good decision, and use that information to become an even better supplier. In doing so, stay focused on monetizing your value at all stages of the game. Remember: you’re here to make profit, not to make products. (Special thanks go out to my friends and former colleagues on the Monitor Group’s pricing team, especially Georg, without whose support over the years, I would not have much to write about.) The post originally appeared on the MIT Entrepreneurship Review . It is written by Jim Schuchart , an MBA candidate at MIT Sloan who previously spent five years as a consultant at Monitor Group.

Read the full article →

Robert Pagliarini: 10 Tips to Save Big Money This Christmas

December 8, 2010

Want to learn how to save money on gifts this Christmas and not feel like a Scrooge? According to this year’s National Retail Federation holiday survey, the average American will spend close to $700 this season on gifts, cards, decorations, and the like. This is one time when you want to be below average — way below. In fact, if you are in debt, just say no to gift buying this holiday. There is absolutely NO reason for you to go further into debt buying gifts for others. There are 13.6 million Americans who are still trying to pay off holiday debt from last year. Don’t join them by digging yourself into a deeper hole. If you are going to buy gifts this year, the key to avoiding a holiday season that drains your bank account is to start planning early. Here are the top 10 money saving tips for steering clear of holiday debt and starting the new year in better financial shape: Plan it. Before you shop online or enter the chaos of the shopping mall, take ten minutes at home to create a spending plan that lists who you need to buy for and how much you will spend. Use discounted gift cards. How would you like100 worth of gifts for80? You can purchase discounted gift cards for hundreds of online/offline retailers including the Apple Store, Radio Shack, Sears, Home Depot, and others. Discounts are usually 5%-30% off the face value of the card. Check out GiftCardRescue.com and GiftCards.com . Use social media. Before you start shopping, start following your favorite retailers on Twitter and Facebook. Many companies offer discounts exclusively to their Twitter followers and Facebook friends. A quick search of their recent posts may reveal money-saving discount codes. Barter via online chat. When you’re shopping online, look for a “chat” or “live help” button. Tell the customer service rep you’d like to shop with them but you want a 15% discount. Ask them to check with their manager or you will abandon your shopping cart and click over to their competitor. This won’t work all of the time, but when it does it will save you money. Find discount codes. I never buy anything online without trying to find a discount code first. I’ve literally saved hundreds of dollars and it doesn’t take more than a minute. Simply go to RetailMeNot.com , SecretPrices.com , and FreeShipping.org to pull up all of the available discounts for your store. Use the discount code during the checkout process to get free shipping or to save 20% or more. Get cash back. If you’re going to spend hundreds of dollars this year on gifts, you might as well try to get a few bucks back. I’ve used ebates.com (affiliate link — all proceeds will go to charity) for some time and have received several rebate checks. Bring on the envelopes, chuck the credit cards. Leave your credit cards and debit cards at home. Allocate an amount of money for each gift, and put that money in separate envelopes marked with the recipients’ names. Give group gifts. When exchanging presents within large groups of people, even “token” gifts can really add up. Try a “white elephant” exchange, a secret Santa strategy, or going in with co-workers on a gift for your boss. Make a promise that you won’t buy anything for yourself. When you’re shopping for gifts, it’s easy to be tempted to buy for yourself. Make this season about others, not you — and remember that the items you want will likely be less expensive during the after-season sales. Avoid the “10% off, buy more” phenomenon. Stores often offer great deals when you sign up for their credit cards, but beware the high rate of interest these cards charge and ask yourself if you’ll really be saving money in the long run. And don’t spend more than you intended just because you’re now getting a discount on your purchase. If you follow these money saving tips, I guarantee you will put more green — and less red — into holiday shopping this year.

Read the full article →

Ernan Roman: Why Your Website Must Provide a Three-Dimensional Experience

December 7, 2010

The Myth: The primary purpose of your web site should be to serve as a combination brochure and on-line ordering portal for customers and prospects. The Reality: Consumers (both BtoB and BtoC) now expect far more than product information and convenience in ordering from online resources. In recent blogs, I shared three megatrends of 21st century marketing: Megatrend #1: that customers expect multichannel, preference-driven communications; Megatrend #2: that they expect us to trust their requirements for deeper engagement; and Megatrend #3: that consumers are willing to share significant amounts of information about their preferences in order to gain valuable information or resources. Let’s take a look at Megatrend # 4, which is also based on recent VOC research for companies such as Microsoft , HMS National , NBC Universal and Life Line Screening . Megatrend # 4: Websites must now provide a three-dimensional experience that engages the customer and abandons the current one-dimensional, corporate, “me”-oriented Web experience. Per VOC research, the three dimensions of experience, in order of importance , are: Provide access to peers , for the most trusted information and recommendations, Provide access to relevant subject matter experts , and Provide easier and faster access to the corporation before, during, and after purchases. Examples of companies who do this well: Amazon.com , now allows shoppers to connect to their Facebook accounts. As a result, Amazon can now display their friends’ favorite books, films, and so on. Amazon also provides access to both expert and amateur reviewers (via its main site) and to a wide range of peers and content experts (via its Omnivoracious interactive blog site). TunerFish , a start-up owned by Comcast, lets users share TV shows and movies they are watching… creating a real-time “TV guide” of programs for friends. Loopt , a location-focused social network with over 3.4 million registered users, recently began showing them which of their friends liked a particular restaurant. Megatrend #4 carries broad marketplace implications likely to play out for decades. According to The New York Times, on-line social networks of friends and colleagues are now a more trusted source of purchase recommendations than traditional search! “The trust factor of friends’ suggestions can make a big difference… Loopt’s users are 20 times more likely to click on a place their friends liked…than a place that simply ranked higher in search results.” — Sam Altman, Co-founder of Loopt Try This: Take a fresh look at your site. Identify how you can provide a three-dimensional experience which provides, in order of importance, better access to: Peers Subject Matter Experts Your Company Ernan Roman is President of the marketing consultancy, Ernan Roman Direct Marketing. Recognized as the industry pioneer who created three transformational methodologies: Integrated Direct Marketing, Opt-In Marketing, and Voice of Customer Relationship Research. Clients include Microsoft, NBC Universal, Disney, Hewlett-Packard and IBM. Ernan was named to “B to B’s Who’s Who” as one of the “100 most influential people” in Business Marketing by Crain’s B to B Magazine. His latest book on marketing best practices was published in October, 2010, and is titled: Voice of the Customer Marketing: A Proven 5-Step Process to Create Customers Who Care, Spend, and Stay . Ernan is also the co-author of “Opt-In Marketing: Increase Sales Exponentially with Consensual Marketing” and author of “Integrated Direct Marketing: The Cutting Edge Strategy for Synchronizing Advertising, Direct Mail, Telemarketing and Field Sales”. www.erdm.com

Read the full article →

eSilicon Names Lawrence Conrad as General Manager of Semiconductor Manufacturing Services Business Unit

December 2, 2010

SMS Business Unit Established to Address Growing Customer Demand

Read the full article →

Video: Johnson Sees `Big’ Black Friday, Holiday Retail Sales

November 24, 2010

Nov. 24 (Bloomberg) — Craig Johnson, president of Customer Growth Partners LLC, talks about the outlook for U.S. retail sales during the holiday season. Johnson speaks with Betty Liu on Bloomberg Television’s “In the Loop.” (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Andrew J. Pease Promoted to President and Chief Executive Officer of QuickLogic Corporation

November 18, 2010

SUNNYVALE, CA–(Marketwire – November 18, 2010) – The Board of Directors of QuickLogic Corporation ( NASDAQ : QUIK ), the lowest power Customer Specific Standard Products ( CSSP s) leader, announced today that as part of its ongoing succession planning process, Andrew J. Pease will be promoted to the position of President and Chief Executive Officer of QuickLogic, effective January 3, 2011. At that time, E. Thomas Hart will assume the new role of Executive Chairman of the Board of Directors.

Read the full article →

Brett King: Trust in Banks…gone! How to get it back?

November 18, 2010

During the global financial crisis, governments spent billions to bail out banks in an effort to keep liquidity in the banking sector, largely so that lending could continue at a time when businesses needed as much help as they could get. However, in a financial crisis when the economy is in recession, it is counter-intuitive for a bank to lend money to customers who might get into further trouble. So the bail out didn’t work in stimulating the economy the way it was intended. The autopilot ‘internal’ risk function kicked in and prevented it from doing so. Some could argue that the ‘risk’ function within banking, while acting to protect institutions, may have actually negatively impacted the speed of recovery. While we have all sorts of classifications around risk within the business environment today (operational, legal, socio-political, financial and market) the greatest risk we potentially face in the banking sector is actually none of these. Our risk “compass” needs to be re-tuned in the light of customer behavioral shift. Industry Reputational Risk Bankers often talk about the ‘trust’ consumers have in banking as a defining characteristic of why customers give us their money instead of simply keeping it under a mattress. It’s also why many bankers have difficulty understanding why customers of today seem perfectly happy to give money to the likes of PayPal, M-PESA, Lending Club or Zopa. The fact is trust in banking is stubbornly stuck in the doldrums, largely as a result of the whole sub-prime, CDO debacle. So will trust return? This is a big theme this year. We are essentially dealing with reputational risk. Not for an individual brand or institution, but the collective reputation of the industry as a whole. That’s the regulator’s job… To assume we can fix this problem is to ascertain that we can have a coordinated approach to restoring consumer confidence as an industry. There are a few issues with this, namely that we generally leave such broader issues to the regulators. After all, what can one bank do about this on it’s own? The problem with this approach is that regulators can only regulate, they can’t make us do good things for our customers. Despite strong regulation, 11 banks (Including the Big 4) are facing class action in Australia by customers over fees . Despite toughening regulation in the United States, the “Move Your Money” campaign continues to live on to this day. It is also why peer-to-peer lending networks are flourishing, why Mint and Blippy are garnering the trust of millions, and why PayPal is the world’s leading online payment network. Customers are moving on, plainly because the industry is no longer differentiated by a reputation built on trust. Let’s face it – regulation is not going to restore trust. The only two things that will fix this gap is building transparency and delivering great service at the coal face. Restoring trust requires us to be un-bank-like… I’ve heard many banks talk about service and being more transparent, but the reality is this is a tough target. When we look at service as a sector we see costs and those costs have to be justified – the question always will be; will an increase in service bring more revenue or simply translate to costs? When we look at transparency , this is counter-intuitive for banks. We have spent our entire existence finding ways to hide margin, fees, and to justify those elements as part of the banking ‘system’ in order to return EPS. The problem is if you screw up with customers today when they’re standing in the branch in a lengthy queue during their lunch break, they are just as likely to start Tweeting or shouting out to friends on Facebook about how “hopeless bank ABC is in the city branch today, this queue is massive!” How do banks respond to such communications? Most ignore these Tweets as inconsequential – does that restore trust? Some respond positively to the tweet, explaining how sorry they are and what they are doing to resolve it… Unfortunately, some Respond negatively ; I’m sorry the customer feels this way, but this is not what we are like – really, some people are just never happy! The only of these responses that will work positively to rebuild trust in the sector is to suck it up, respond positively, and figure how to create a better service culture or resolve the process problems that created them. You can’t do that if you aren’t listening. Excellence is trustworthy When you build a great service environment, then there is no need to worry about being transparent. Customers these days will pay a premium for great service. If service is not your thing, then be transparent about that, but explain you don’t charge as much as those other banks and that is the benefit of your bank. If, however, you want to keep fully loaded fee structures in place, then you’ll have to be transparent about the cost of delivering great service. If you aren’t delivering great service, and you are still leveraging fees like it was the 90s, you’ll find out that this strategy doesn’t work – just ask the big 4 banks in Australia. NAB, thus far, is the only bank to positively respond to this pressure by taking a new, transparent stance on fees . There are some simple steps to take that will bring rapid improvements: Simplify bank language through a plain-language initiative – refer Centre for Plain Language and Whitney Quesenbery Make it easy to find the best phone numbers to speak to the right area of the bank on your website, circumvent IVR menu trees where possible. Citi in the US does this pretty well. Mystery shop, not competitors, but the most common processes in your multi-channel environment and see where these need to be drastically simplified, and use Observational Field Studies to see how customers work in real-world settings. Put a social media listening post in place and respond positively and openly at every opportunity – check out Gatorade’s Mission Control Review the biggest complaints you get in the call centre, and try to fix those customer journeys proactively. We call these Torch Points… Building trust starts with creating great customer journeys that improve service levels and demonstrate a willingness to be transparent. We can’t rebuild trust without these elements. The biggest risk today, is simply that I don’t trust you enough to give you my money.

Read the full article →

Tom Johansmeyer: Five Ways Corporate Bloggers Can Use Twitter Blackbird Pie

November 16, 2010

With the relatively new plug-in available for WordPress, Twitter Media’s Blackbird Pie feature is now available for both WordPress.com and WordPress.org users. The tool, which allows you to embed tweets in blog posts with a similar look and feel to how they appear on Twitter, has been around for several months, yet it didn’t work well on WordPress blogs. Now it’s out, and as with any social media tool, it doesn’t take long for the marketers to think about how to use it. Let’s take a look at a few ways Twitter’s Blackbird pie can be used in a social media marketing setting: 1. Cross-Promote Your Social Media Environments: The links in the embedded Tweets are clickable, so you can use Blackbird Pie with a corporate blog to drive traffic to a company or employee’s Twitter feed. This is a great way to turn one-time visits from search engines or referrals (for example) into ongoing members of your social media community. How Continuous #Marketing Widens Your Margins http://ht.ly/2W3Y7 less than a minute ago via HootSuite enter:marketing entermarketing 2. Capture and Amplify Customer Sentiment: Use positive feedback on Twitter as a promotional tool on your corporate blog. For example, you could create a Top 5 Customer Reactions of the Week post with embedded tweets: this is effectively a dynamic testimonial environment you can use to bolster your brand. Really cannot recommend @ FSHotelHouston enough for its excellent customer service and pure quality! #customerservicewin less than a minute ago via ÜberTwitter Ty Francis welshwonder 3. Be Brutally Honest about Your Brand: Post the bad news, too. Open an article on your corporate blog with a negative tweet from a customer or other stakeholder about your company. Then, turn it into a case study and highlight the resolution. You can convert an unhappy moment into a strong promotional opportunity. @ crifdogs #customerservicewin u guys just took a tricky situation over the phone & handled it masterfully. less than a minute ago via HootSuite Tom Johansmeyer tjohansmeyer 4. Support Your Business Partners and Complementary Companies: Embed tweets by important companies in your supply chain, joint venture partners and other companies with strategic relationships into your corporate blog. Support the companies that support yours. By using Blackbird Pie to embed their tweets into posts on your corporate blog, you can drive followers to them and add value to your existing relationships. RT @ firstnight : @ FirstNight 2011 button unveiled last night by @ scottlistfield , @ wbz anchors at @ Colonnade http://bit.ly/FN2011button less than a minute ago via HootSuite Colonnade Boston Colonnade 5. Reinforce Your Message: Has someone you follow on Twitter let fly 140 characters that help you make a point? Have you received an “@ reply” message that exemplifies a concept you’re trying to convey? You can use this stuff! Embed these tweets in a post on your corporate blog to get the same effect as a blockquote but in a much more powerful manner. Come back soon! RT @ loriannelacey : It will be sad to not wake up to this #view tomorrow @ Curtain_Bluff #Antigua http://plixi.com/p/56943783 less than a minute ago via TweetDeck Curtain Bluff Curtain_Bluff Tom Johansmeyer is the Sr Content Director at enter:marketing . His opinions are strictly his own.

Read the full article →

Brett Greene: How Social Media Influences Customer Service

November 15, 2010

Before you read the full story, I want to start with the fact that Vonage gave me great customer service, but getting there was an unnecessary adventure. Back in August of 2009 I signed up for a Vonage phone line when AT&T dumped their VoIP service in Colorado. I was happy with AT&T Callvantage for years and had actually left Vonage for AT&T years ago because of frustration with Vonage’s service issues and dealing with their call centers in India, which have since moved back to the United States. In February of 2010 I realized that I was using the phone on rare occasions. Using the combination of my iPhone , Skype and Bria was a good one for my personal and business needs. When I called to cancel Vonage I was reminded of their exorbitant early termination fee . (I consider this common telecom company extortion. Can you name one other service you have to pay to stop using? But we’ll save that for another post.) It was cheaper to finish out the contract at $10 (plus $6 in taxes and fees) each month for 100 hours of local service, which I knew I wouldn’t use, rather than pay the early termination fee. So I agreed to that change. On August 30, 2010 I called and finally canceled the service, or thought I had. A few days ago I noticed that I had been charged $16 in September and again in October. I called Vonage yet again to correct the mistake. For an hour I explained the situation to their representative and then to his supervisor, who said they did not have the power to issue a refund for the $32. Their notes showed that I had accepted a free month of service in exchange for continuing the service, which is not an agreement I had made, though the representative kept trying to push me into accepting it. They were robots following their scripts with a mandate to not let a customer leave easily. During conversations with both of them I did something I have never done in these situations before: I mentioned that I have over 30,000 Twitter followers with whom I would be sharing my experience. They didn’t seem to care. After they acknowledged that my account notes demonstrated I had dropped to the lowest plan in February, they claimed the only way they could help me was to cancel my service and possibly issue a refund later. According to the supervisor I spoke with, any refund issued would still require them to review the August 30th recorded phone call to confirm that I had not accepted a free month of service (which, incidentally, they had charged me for anyway). I asked the supervisor why anyone who was forced to pay for a service for 6 months that they wanted to cancel would agree to staying on for a free month. Any thinking person can understand how illogical that argument is. Ideally, a good customer service rep would acknowledge the mistake and rectify the situation in a way that the customer leaves feeling good about the company. This would result in the spreading of positive stories about their experiences with the company. Instead, the people I dealt with repeated in a mechanical way that they understood my problem, but that they couldn’t solve it. What a difference 17 hours and 30,000 Twitter followers makes! I posted a note on Twitter about this at 5pm Thursday night. By 9:30 am @Vonage responded to me by asking me how they could help and then brought @Vonage_Voice into the online conversation. A virtual Twitterstorm ensued in front of about 35,000 people following me and @Vonage. The Vonage social media customer service person was helpful and tried to get me offline as quickly as possible to talk with someone on their executive response team. Undoubtably, this was mostly done to make me happy enough to stop telling people online about my bad experience with Vonage. My refund was magically issued about 2 hours later, without anyone reviewing my August 30th phone call. So why couldn’t the representative or the supervisor I wasted an hour on the phone with offer me the same solution? I’m sharing this story in hopes that Vonage and other companies will address their ineffective customer service systems so that customers don’t need to resort to calling them out publicly in order to be treated fairly and receive a resolution for their account issues. Having an executive response team is smart. Not giving lower level employees the freedom to fix an inexpensive mistake is short-sighted. In hindsight, how much revenue will Vonage lose on the negative public relations this easily solvable situation generated? Vonage’s competitors and tens of thousands of potential customers can now discover and review customer to corporate communications on the social web that are now indexed and archived online forever in the Library of Congress. How much money was wasted by having four employees use up two hours of company time responding to my case? Definitely more than the $32 a representative could have refunded to me after a 10-minute conversation. This isn’t a Vonage issue as much as an issue with doing business the old way versus the social business way . We’ve all had similar experiences and wasted dozens of hours with companies that continue to use antiquated customer service systems. All they have to do to make the systems better is to treat customers like people instead of dollars. Companies should stop forcing customer service representatives to behave like robots, for fear of upsetting their supervisors when the best resolution is to give the customers what they want — even if that means to cancel service. If Vonage had done that I would have been posting on Twitter, Facebook and blogs about how this is one company that “gets it” instead of the dissatisfaction you’re reading now. Hopefully, as more companies realize that we live in a social ecosystem where people have voices that are heard by other customers, their customer service practices will change. Companies who embrace the social web enjoy customer loyalty from people who will promote them and give feedback on how to make their products and services more valuable. This engagement can only boost the companies’ bottom line if they pay attention and make strategic changes based on the feedback they are receiving. Operating a business with the customer in mind is more beneficial and cost effective on multiple levels. Maintaining hierarchical systems where both employees and customers are marginalized is both disempowering and costly. We live in a new era of collaboration between companies and the customers whose loyalties they seek. It’s better to build a large following of raving fans than to burn customer bridges over $32. Please share your own stories of inadequate customer service in the comment section to help corporate America understand what’s broken in their systems so they can understand how to prevent future damage.

Read the full article →

Brad Feld: Selecting Co-Founders

November 12, 2010

Having been involved directly or indirectly in hundreds of early stage software and Internet companies, I believe the optimal number of founders for a software / Internet startup is between two and four. Starting a company by yourself is incredibly difficult. It can be done, but it’s the exception not the rule. It’s rare that a startup follows a clean and predictable trajectory – if you are alone as a founder, you’ll need to navigate this yourself. That’s a lonely and thankless task. At the minimum, having other co-founders along for the journey will give you peers to talk to when you want to beat your head against the wall with frustration. Observing over 70 companies that have gone through the various TechStars programs in Boulder, Boston, and Seattle has resulted in another insight for me – the best founding teams are “product leaning” with at least 50% of the founders focused on the product This doesn’t necessarily mean that they are software developers, but it does mean that they spend all of their time thinking about, working on, and obsessing about the product. So – if you have two founders, at least one should be product obsessed. If three founders, then at least two should be product obsessed. For four co-founders, you can split it two and two but I always encourage three product obsessed founders in this case (two devs and one product person.) Being “obsessed with the product” doesn’t mean doing this in a vacuum. The best software / Internet companies follow a customer facing and rapid iteration model such as the Lean Startup Methodology popularized by Eric Ries and Steve Blank. In this context, being product obsessed means “in the context of the customer”, which requires the product leaning people to interact frequently with prospective customers and users early and continually in the product development process. In our book, Do More Faster (http://www.domorefasterbook.com), TechStars CEO David Cohen and I have an entire theme on “People”. One of our favorite chapters is by Dharmesh Shah, the co-founder and CTO of Hubspot, titled ” Avoid Co-founder Conflict.” In this chapter, Dhramesh describes a series of conflicts that often arise between co-founders and gives suggestions for resolving them One of the most common questions I hear is “how do I find a co-founder?” Ironically, you probably all ready know your co-founder – it’s either a friend, someone you work with, or a colleague of a friend. Aggressively use your network as a starting point as the chance of finding a fit through someone you are already connected with is much greater than trying to recruit, learn, and team up with someone you don’t yet know. Selecting co-founders and building a lasting and effective professional relationship is challenging. If you recognize this going in and invest real time up front in the partnership it will pay off many times over.

Read the full article →

Anthony Tjan: The Fallacy of Financial Metrics

October 27, 2010

In both entrepreneurial and larger companies, we too often spend time focusing on the desired financial performance target, rather than the inputs that drive those numbers. Because boards, investors and management demand an objective way to measure performance, we often go right to the result without focusing on what caused those results. Financial performance is a result, a by-product, a consequence of something else. The financial “numbers” ultimately represent the scorecard we care about, but they do not help us understand how to score. When we ask management teams what are the most important drivers (or what we call operating metrics) of their financial results, I usually see one of two reactions: a) a dog in front of the television blank stare or b) a further breakdown of financial results: “sales on the West Coast drove the results.” When pressed further, we may get even further sales breakdowns which tell us little. As my partner, Dick Harrington, says, “We end up slicing baloney with a scalpel” and are talking too much about the “what” without getting the “why.” Operating metrics are the inputs that correlate or drive the desired results of a business. If you focus on the inputs, you need to worry less about the financial outputs. Examples of inputs include customer convenience, product quality, customer retention, or customer referral rate. Let me provide a couple of concrete examples. In many of our retail or restaurant investments, we espouse a value proposition of convenience. The more convenient we can make the experience, the happier the customer will be, and the more likely we will have customer repeat and referral, meaning not just higher revenues but higher quality of revenues. How does convenience translate into a measurable operating metric? As a proxy for convenience we measure metrics such as turn-away rates and wait times for service. That is, when a prospective patron walks in or makes a call for a reservation how often do we turn them away because we are full or short-staffed? We want that turn-away number as low as possible to reinforce convenience. If we detect a repeat issue we can see how to solve it, perhaps through improved reservations systems or increased staffing. Other metrics we might measure include weekly cleanliness scores, customer loyalty, and periodic customer satisfaction reviews. Of course we will look at these operating metrics alongside the financial and more quantitative results, but again–the point is to uncover the correlation between operating drivers and financial outcomes. Businesses need to focus on the 3-5 metrics that represent the most important drivers of value creation. It helps align an organization towards doing the right thing in a repeatable and scalable manner. When you just ask a team to chase results on a plan, you may never be sure what drove that result even if you are successful. There is a difference between having a good year of numbers and a sustainable business model that allows for more predictable year-over-year results. From a managerial tool perspective, a weekly or monthly dashboard that highlights not just the financial results, but also the operating metrics is smarter and more actionable. A dashboard with operating metrics serves effectively as an exception-based report where you look for deviations from the norm of operating metric levels and then consider whether the issue is systemic or one-off. It is true that people behave based on what they are measured by. Here are some guidelines on setting a culture driven by operating metrics and measuring your team on the right stuff: 1. Ensure management understands the difference between operating metrics and financial metrics – operating inputs versus financial ratios. The latter is for number-crunching analysts to focus on, the former is for managers and it is what will make the latter automatic. 2. Clearly communicate across the organization a small number of the most important operating metrics. It takes some thought to filter through the many possible inputs / operating metrics, but pick only the 3-5 that have the highest correlation to the desired financial goals. 3. Regularly review an operating metric dashboard, but focus on exceptions. You’ll be able to scan the health of your business very quickly. In an earlier blog, I interviewed superstar Oprah doctor and cardiac surgeon Mehmet Oz, and discussed the vitals for good personal health. Indeed, an excellent analogy is that operating metrics should represent the blood pressure and cholesterol levels of a company. Focus on the right ones, regularly measure them, and if they are out of whack, do something before your company has a heart attack. This article first appeared on Harvard Business Publishing on June 8, 2009.

Read the full article →

Massimo LoBuglio: The Little Green Bakeshop That Could

October 22, 2010

When I need advice about my small business, I often turn to my family who are fifth generation fine jewelry makers. They get this bit of wisdom better than anyone: If you try to be everything to everybody, you’ll end up with nothing; and, if you stay in the middle of the road, you’ll miss the opportunity to author an authentic point that speaks to the reality of your customers’ lives. At the Little Cupcake Bakeshop , when we began work on our green mission in 2005 — the “pre-An Inconvenient Truth era,” as some environmentalists like to call it — there was no indication we’d be successful. We serve great baked goods and high-quality teas and coffee in a luxurious space that’s designed to be a gathering place where the community comes to hang out, interact, host friends and meet new people. (That means no Wi-Fi!) Built into the core of our business model are carbon solutions that we’ve tried to make palatable to our customers. We largely drew on best practices from the greening efforts of college campuses nationwide. That part came easy. Messaging, though, is an ongoing puzzle. “Green” touches products, store design, operations, staffing, community relations and marketing. It impacts everything we do, but carbon-reduction isn’t something the customer can feel, see or touch. As a traditional-bound, Republican stronghold, Bay Ridge, Brooklyn was an interesting landscape to launch a green project. Conventional wisdom suggests that green projects gain more traction in some of Brooklyn’s more liberal neighborhoods, like Carroll Gardens, Park Slope or Williamsburg. But I knew we could earn Bay Ridge’s attention and consideration. Faith plays a big part in people’s lives here. Growing up Catholic, and having an intimate understanding of the local community, I knew that if we did this right, people would come to see climate and pollution control as a moral issue, rather than something political. To save money, we view every facet of our business through an environmental lens. At our bake shop, we implement measures to reduce as much carbon as possible. We’ve installed CFL lights, light dimmers, motion sensors, Energy Star equipment, low flow water aerators, energy efficient appliances like Dyson’s new hand dryer, which is 80 percent more efficient than conventional models, and Low E window panes. The shop also uses reusable mugs, plates, forks and spoons, instead of disposable ones. (When we began serving reusable porcelain mugs, we saved approximately 125 cups, lids and sleeves per day. The savings are incredible. One simple change saves us over $9,000.) I believe now more than ever that responsible small businesses are poised to become leaders in the battle to reverse our nation’s environmental woes. When it comes to managing a real business in a real community, fundamentals like efficiency, conservation and waste reduction, matter more than ever before. We’ve been so successful with our green mission that we’ve just opened a second shop in Manhattan’s SoHo district . We’ve retrofitted two spaces using green materials and practices. Our opening date was 10.10.10, as it marked an auspicious occasion to stand together with people around the world organizing climate change events. This international day of action, led by 350.org , went down as the largest climate mobilization event on record. We hope our opening played a small role in educating people about 350ppm .

Read the full article →

The 14th Banker: How Do We Judge the Homeowner?

October 18, 2010

In the rush to foreclosure, the banks and even government officials have been taking the position that the borrower/homeowners are fully to blame for the situations they find themselves in and that the paperwork technicalities just need to be worked out in order for there to be a just outcome, which is to say, a foreclosure. Industry executives note that few, if any, borrowers in the foreclosure process dispute the fact that they’re not paying their mortgages. “We’re not evicting people who deserve to stay in their house,” James Dimon, J.P. Morgan chief executive, told analysts Wednesday. Okay. This seems simple enough. The contract between the bank and the borrower says that the borrower will make their payments and that if they don’t, the bank can foreclose. Assuming the bank did everything right, it can. We live under the free market paradigm and that is simple free market — and contract law — cause and effect. But, what if the borrower was defrauded in either a legal sense or a moral sense at the inception of the contract? That may not make the contract unenforceable, but does it make the enforcement inequitable? Does it erode this moral high ground that lenders are claiming? Perhaps we need to be more discriminating here.  Some time ago I posted on asymmetrical information in regard to one type of transaction. But suppose that there was asymmetrical information at the time the mortgage was originated? According to Dealbroker, Jamie decided on October 2006 to get J.P. Morgan out of Subprime. According to the article, the JPM team decided that quality control had slipped at the originator level. What might this mean? I suspect “quality control” is a euphemism for rampant fraud. So lets just say that October, 2006 is “Day Zero.” It used to be said that a business person needed a good banker, a good accountant, and a good lawyer. (Now it might be said that a banker needs a good lawyer.) Implied in this is that there is a professional relationship and that the customer depends on the advice of these professionals. Bankers have until recently seen themselves as professionals. In the less heady days of local banking, the President and senior officers of the bank made the loan decisions. One of them generally had a relationship with the borrower. They knew the borrower and had their interest in mind along with the interest of the bank. There was a certain implied fairness at work. The judgment of the banker often accrued to the benefit of the borrower. If the banker thought something was a bad deal, they said so. If they thought the borrower was making a bad investment either in general or in relation to their specific circumstances (knowledge, skills, income, liquidity, time horizons…) they would tell them that. The mechanistic finance models took that away. So is there any difference in the way we should look at someone who purchased a house on Day Zero minus One versus Day Zero Plus One?  Perhaps before Day Zero, the general conditions in the market were that everyone was wrong. Everyone thought prices would continue to rise. Everyone thought the rising prices would mitigate the imprudent loan processes and structures, the no-doc loans, the 97% loans or 120% home equity loans. At Day Zero plus One, that changed. The caution light should have come on and the relationship of the professional banker to the client should have included caveats about the investments that were being made. This is idealistic, I admit. But, someone should investigate when JP Morgan and every other bank changed their policies in regard to loan to value, income verification, product recommendations to customers, instructions to bankers, incentives to bankers, etc. If banks knew in the executive suite or the research department that the fundamentals were turning ugly, and still kept making loans and shoving them into government guarantee programs or selling them to investors, then there is no moral high ground. The information asymmetry was used to make more money. In a moral sensibility, the contract should be looked at what it was, a gamble by both parties. If at this point in time the stupidity of the lender has allowed the contract to become unenforceable, then that is the lender’s problem. Too bad, so sad. Now, none of this absolves the borrower of responsibility for their decision. It just puts the borrower and the lender on a level moral ground and perhaps they find themselves on level legal grounds. If that is the case, the lenders should get off their high horse and negotiate modifications that share the losses between two equally culpable parties.

Read the full article →