danish

Iran, Danish Haldor Topsoe to build petchem complex

Continued here:
Iran, Danish Haldor Topsoe to build petchem complex

CANCUN, Mexico — A U.N. conference on Saturday adopted a modest climate deal creating a fund to help the developing world go green, though it deferred for another year the tough work of carving out deeper reductions in carbon emissions causing Earth to steadily warm. Though the accords were limited, it was the first time in three years the 193-nation conference adopted any climate action, restoring faith in the unwieldy U.N. process after the letdown a year ago at a much-anticipated summit in Copenhagen. The Cancun Agreements created institutions for delivering technology and funding to poorer countries, though they did not say where the funding would come from. In urging industrial countries to move faster on emissions cuts, it noted that scientists recommended reducing greenhouse gas emissions from industrial countries by 25 to 40 per cent from 1990 levels within the next 10 years. Current pledges amount to about 16 percent. Mexican President Felipe Calderon, in a 4 a.m. speech, declared the conference “a thoroughgoing success,” after two separate agreements were passed. The agreements shattered “the inertia of mistrust” that had settled over the frustrated efforts for a broad climate treaty, he said. One of the agreements renewed a framework for cutting greenhouse gas emissions but set no new targets for industrial countries. The second created a financial and technical support system for developing countries facing grave threats from global warming. Foreign Secretary Patricia Espinosa, the conference president, gaveled the deal through early Saturday over the objections of Bolivia’s delegate, who said it was so weak it would endanger the planet. Decisions at the U.N. climate talks are typically made by consensus, but Espinosa said consensus doesn’t “mean that one country has the right to veto” decisions supported by everyone else. The accord establishes a multibillion dollar annual Green Climate Fund to help developing countries cope with climate change, though it doesn’t say how the fund’s money is to be raised. Last year in Copenhagen governments agreed to mobilize $100 billion a year for developing countries, starting in 2020, much of which will be handled by the fund. The agreements also set rules for internationally funded forest conservation, and provides for climate-friendly technology to expanding economies. Espinosa won repeated standing ovations from a packed conference hall for her deft handling of bickering countries and for drafting an acceptable deal, though it fully satisfied no one. “It’s been a challenging, tiring and intensive week” said U.S. special climate envoy Todd Stern, clearly content with the results. The European Union’s top climate official, Connie Hedegaard, said Saturday’s decisions would help keep international climate talks on track. “But the two weeks in Cancun have shown once again how slow and difficult the process is,” Hedegaard said. “Everyone needs to be aware that we still have a long and challenging journey ahead of us to reach the goal of a legally binding global climate framework.” Christiana Figueres, the U.N.’s senior climate official, said the agreements would put all governments on cleaner trajectory. “Cancun has done its job,” she said. Environmentalists cautiously welcomed the deal. It “wasn’t enough to save the climate,” said Alden Meyer of the Washington-based Union of Concerned Scientists. “But it did restore the credibility of the United Nations as a forum where progress can be made.” The Cancun deal finessed disputes between industrial and developing countries on future emissions cuts and incorporates voluntary reduction pledges attached to the Copenhagen Accord that emerged from last year’s climate summit in the Danish capital. It struck a skillful compromise between the U.S. and China, which had been at loggerheads throughout the two week conclave on methods for monitoring and verifying actions to curtail greenhouse gases. “What we have now is a text that, while not perfect, is certainly a good basis for moving forward,” Stern said during the decisive conference meeting. His Chinese counterpart, Xie Zhenhua, sounded a similar note and added, “The negotiations in the future will continue to be difficult.” The accord “goes beyond what we expected when we came here,” said Wendel Trio of the Greenpeace environmental group. Underscoring what’s at stake in the long-running climate talks, NASA reported that the January-November 2010 global temperatures were the warmest in the 131-year record. Its data indicated the year would likely end as the warmest on record, or tied with 2005 as the warmest. The U.N.’s top climate science body has said swift and deep reductions are required to keep temperatures from rising more than 2 degrees Celsius (3.8 F) above preindustrial levels, which could trigger catastrophic climate impacts. Bolivian delegate Pablo Solon protested that the weak pledges of the Copenhagen Accord condemned the Earth to temperature increases of up to 4 degrees Celsius (7.2 F), saying that is tantamount to “ecocide” that could cost millions of lives. He also complained that the text was being railroaded over his protests in violation of the U.N.’s consensus rules. In the 1992 U.N. climate treaty, the world’s nations promised to do their best to rein in carbon dioxide and other heat-trapping gases emitted by industry, transportation and agriculture. In the two decades since, the annual conferences’ only big advance came in 1997 in Kyoto, Japan, when parties agreed on modest mandatory reductions by richer nations. But the U.S., alone in the industrial world, rejected the Kyoto Protocol, complaining it would hurt its economy and that such emerging economies as China and India should have taken on emissions obligations. Since then China has replaced the U.S. as the world’s biggest emitter, but it has resisted calls that it assume legally binding commitments – not to lower its emissions, but to restrain their growth. Here at Cancun such issues came to a head, as Japan and Russia fought pressure to acknowledge in a final decision that they will commit to a second period of emissions reductions under Kyoto, whose current targets expire in 2012. The Japanese complained that with the rise of China, India, Brazil and others, the 37 Kyoto industrial nations now account for only 27 percent of global greenhouse emissions. They want a new, legally binding pact obligating the U.S., China and other major emitters.

See more here:
UN Climate Deal Marks A Tiny Step Forward For Fighting Climate Change

Charles Kolb: The Building Blocks of Corporate Statesmanship

July 23, 2010

Jørgen Vig Knudstorp is not a household name in America. And those few who may know him probably can’t pronounce his name. Or remember how to spell it. But there are millions of American children and parents who know the company he runs and use his products every day. Mr. Vig Knudstorp is the CEO of the Danish-based children’s company we know as LEGO. As an educational “toy,” the value of the LEGO building blocks has been phenomenal. What the company, now more than 80-years-old, calls the LEGO system of play — “learning through LEGO” — considers young children as role models for our future and as creative problem-solvers. Their CEO is quite sincere when he says that what the company really cares about is inspiring the young people who will build our tomorrow. Is this just more corporate happy talk? Hardly. The founding CEO of Google, Larry Page, has called LEGO the most important technology he has encountered: those little blocks taught him literally how to think digitally and algorithmically. LEGO is a company that is all about play – about exploring the connections between creative play and learning, about approaching play as a catalyst for learning. The company is focused on the future — not short-term, but long-term. Over the last two years, I have had the pleasure of spending time with Mr. Vig Knudstorp on three continents: Europe, North America, and, last month, South America – at an early education forum in Sao Paulo, Brazil . With support from the Bernard Van Leer Foundation in The Hague , the Committee for Economic Development, along with LEGO Education, United Way Brasil, Conselho Empresarial da America Latina, Todos Pela Educação, and Instituto para o Desenvolvimento do Investimento Social, co-sponsored a day-long forum for Brazilian business leaders about the important economic returns associated with public and private investments in early education. Our goal was to increase the number of Brazilian business leaders who support expanded investments in early childhood education. After the conference ended, I spent part of the next day with Vig Knudstorp and a LEGO team visiting a school supported by the company in one of the more than 1,500 slums (” favelas “) found throughout Sao Paulo, a city with more than 19 million residents. LEGO Education has an approach called ” Brick by Brick: The Brazil We Want ” that is working with dozens of schools throughout the country to improve education. The school we visited is in “Heliopolis,” Sao Paulo’s second largest favela and home to some 120,000 people. This trip was Vig Knudstorp’s first visit to Brazil — but certainly not his last. LEGO’s commitment is tangible – not just because of the LEGO blocks we saw the children playing with but also in the impact LEGO is having among these very poor children and their families. One could see hope, excitement, pride – and, yes, creativity. In one classroom, the students showed us an award they had won last year for a creative LEGO design. The award itself was a trophy made from LEGOs, and it rested on a LEGO stand. Two of the young children proudly presented it to the LEGO CEO. Vig Knudstorp reached into his pocket and took out his business card — something unique among global CEOs, I suspect: his business card is a little LEGO figure of himself. (You can change his hair, if you like, and move his arms and legs. His name is on the front; his personal e-mail address is on the back. If you write to him, he’ll write you back.) He adjusted the arms on his “card” so that they were raised up, to the sky, and then he gently placed the little figure on the stand so that it was facing the award — arms raised in celebration and joy at the children’s success. It was a moment with these children that was unforgettable. In his remarks the previous day at the forum, Vig Knudstorp reflected on what his company’s efforts might mean to a broader, international business community. He made three points. First, in older, industrial societies, people went to work and mostly did what they were told. Those days are over: the workforce of today and of the future will not emphasize obedience but, instead creativity, and a passion for what workers do. This workforce will be much more logical, systematic, and analytical. Second, an IBM survey of some 1,500 global CEOs noted that the biggest challenges they faced had to do with the ability of their organizations to relate to diverse corporate stakeholders; the ability to foster “dexterous” organizations that could act quickly, change as needed, and be self-correcting in a bottoms-up rather than top-down approach; and the ability to generate creativity throughout all aspects of a company’s business. Third, Vig Knudstorp sees fundamentally two types of companies that will exist in our future: companies that essentially work for themselves and companies that focus not on what they make but on “why” they make it. The former, he says, often put the cart before the horse, whereas the latter consider, as part of their operations, the impact they have on the environment, their communities, and their countries. Focusing on an issue such as early childhood education offers companies and their leaders a great “why” instead of just focusing on what companies and business leaders do for themselves. Moreover, in his view, the most talented employees in the future will prefer to work for companies that have a strong “why.” Are there lessons from this Dane and his extraordinary company for American business and its CEOs? There are many: about long-term investments in education and the workforce, about the values that animate a corporate environment, about encouraging creativity instead of “groupthink,” about building self-correcting mechanisms inside companies that don’t wait for the regulator to step in once the bubble has burst, and about creating a sense of purpose that goes beyond quarterly earnings reports and compensation. Corporate America right now has a terrible perception among the American public at large. The building blocks for turning around this situation are right there, before our eyes. ______________________________________________________________ Charles Kolb served in the first Bush White House from 1990-1992 and as General Counsel of United Way of America from 1992-1997. He is now President of the Committee for Economic Development in Washington, D.C. The views in this article are solely the author’s.

Read the full article →

Qantas, Virgin Say They’re Open to Bids as Airline Industry Consolidates

June 7, 2010

By Steven Rothwell and Cornelius Rahn June 8 (Bloomberg) — Qantas Airways Ltd. and Virgin Atlantic Airways Ltd. said they’re open to merger proposals as efforts to cut costs and boost traffic push carriers to combine. Qantas, Australia’s biggest airline, favors an inter- continental deal and would be “a great asset for anyone,” Chief Executive Officer Alan Joyce said in an interview. Virgin is exploring options as U.S. and European mergers squeeze its position in the North Atlantic market, CEO Steve Ridgway said. “Consolidation isn’t easy to do and cross-border inter- continental mergers have not occurred yet, but I think they will and Qantas will be at the forefront of that,” Joyce said in Berlin, adding that the process “will take some time.” Joyce didn’t say if he favored a combination with British Airways Plc , which held merger talks with Qantas in 2008 before agreeing to a deal with Iberia Lineas Aereas de Espana SA. Virgin, British Airways’s biggest competitor at London’s Heathrow airport, is reviewing its standalone stance after regulators said they’d approve an expanded alliance between British Airways and AMR Corp.’s American Airlines and after United Airlines agreed to combine with Continental Airlines Inc. “We’re a small company still,” Ridgway said in an interview in Berlin where, like Joyce, he was attending the annual meeting of the International Air Transport Association. “We would be looking potentially just to grow ourselves, to become part of a bigger group. We just need to look at what happens in the industry over the next 18 months.” LOT, SAS Polish national carrier LOT said its forecasts of a return to profit this year are attracting interest from other carriers and private-equity firms, while SAS Group AB CEO Mats Jansson said a new wave of consolidation in Europe is likely to begin in earnest next year as prospects improve. Sydney-based Qantas’s previous negotiations with British Airways were called off after the pair failed to agree on how to split ownership, the U.K. carrier has said. A combination would have created a carrier with $24 billion in sales and 500 planes. Talks were complex because the London-based company had more revenue and Qantas a higher market value. That’s still the case. “I don’t think you can ever look back and have any regrets,” Joyce said. “I think you have to look forward, and we do look forward at what other opportunities do exist.” Qantas is already partnered with British Airways in the Oneworld alliance, as are American Airlines and Spain’s Iberia, with which the U.K. company aims to complete a merger this year British billionaire Richard Branson ’s Virgin Atlantic isn’t in a global grouping and specializes in point-to-point travel to business destinations and high-end tourist resorts. Singapore Stake Singapore Airlines Ltd. owns a 49 percent stake in the Crawley, England-based company, though CEO Ridgway said it’s possible that the holding could be offered for sale as the Asian carrier modifies its strategy to reflect the expansion of the Indian and Chinese markets in the past 10 years. “Singapore Airlines is a great shareholder, and I don’t think they’re in any hurry to do that,” he said. “At the end of the day it’s down to them, but it could be an opportunity.” Malaysian Airline System Bhd. , which like Virgin stands apart from the Oneworld, Star and SkyTeam alliances, also favors consolidation to boost earnings and cut costs, CEO Tengku Azmil Zahruddin said yesterday at the IATA event. “As an industry we are far too fragmented and that is one of the reasons that we don’t make reasonable returns for shareholders,” the CEO said during a roundtable discussion. ‘Too Early’ SAS, the unprofitable owner of Scandinavian Airlines rescued by share sales that saw the Swedish, Danish and Norwegian governments increase their stakes, has said it’s unlikely to remain independent once earnings are restored. CEO Jansson said yesterday that the level of losses suffered by European carriers during the recession means it’s “too early” to contemplate consolidation this year. “2011 is the time for new steps in the consolidation process,” Jansson said in an interview. “When companies feel they’ve done their homework, they’re in good shape and the market is stable, then boards will start to look at the acquisition list, but not now.” Poland’s LOT, or Polskie Linie Lotnicze LOT SA, said right now is “a very good moment” to seek a buyer. The company, which aims to post a profit in 2010 after losing money for the past two years, has sent “teasers” that attracted interest from “a few” airlines and investment funds and a transaction could in theory be agreed “very quickly,” CEO Sebastian Mikosz said in an interview. At Qantas, Joyce said an investment-grade debt rating will be a major attraction for a merger partner. The Asia-Pacific market is also now “very healthy,” though demand on routes to Europe is weak and of most strategic concern, he said. Air France’s purchase of KLM Royal Dutch Airlines in 2004 is the airline industry’s biggest deal to date. It would be surpassed by merger of United Airlines parent UAL Corp. and Continental in a $3 billion stock swap announced on May 3. To contact the reporters on this story: Steven Rothwell in Berlin via srothwell@bloomberg.net ; Cornelius Rahn in Berlin via crahn2@bloomberg.net

Read the full article →

Danisco Seeks `Financial Muscle’ With Dupont-Style Alliances Amid Bid Talk

May 12, 2010

By Christian Wienberg May 12 (Bloomberg) — Danisco A/S , the Danish company that’s developing bio-fuels with DuPont Co. , will pursue similar alliances to gain “financial muscle” and defend against possible takeover approaches as the market for enzymes attracts larger rivals, its chief executive officer said. The biochemical market may grow too quickly for Danisco to cope alone and partnerships would help it remain independent, CEO Tom Knutzen said in an interview. The Copenhagen-based company hasn’t yet received any offers, he said. “We don’t believe we can take up all that growth on our own,” said Knutzen, 48. “We will partner up, also for balance- sheet reasons. As a public company, we’re obviously for sale every day. But it’s not the way that we want to go.” Danisco’s plan to remove a cap on voting rights has put renewed focus on the company’s potential as a takeover target. Knutzen sold a sugar business last year, leaving Danisco focused on more profitable food additives and biofuel enzymes, markets that have attracted DuPont and BASF SE . Danisco on May 6 predicted it will report annual earnings ahead of targets. The board will seek shareholder approval to lift the restriction limiting voting rights to 7.5 percent, regardless of the size of the stake held, at an annual meeting in August. The move will modernize Danisco’s corporate governance and is not designed to lure suitors, Knutzen said. Danisco, whose food ingredients go into half of the world’s ice cream, has climbed 11 percent this year in Copenhagen, valuing the business at almost 19 billion kroner ($3.3 billion). Novozymes A/S, a Bagsvaerd, Denmark-based rival that’s double the size, has added 18 percent. Royal DSM NV has fallen 6.3 percent. Chief Financial Officer Rolf-Dieter Schwalb said April 28 that DSM is “willing and ready” to make purchases. Single and Happy Knutzen said he views the growing interest in biochemicals as an opportunity rather than a threat. Danisco got together with DuPont to develop biofuel from non-food organic material like corn cobs. It’s also making isoprene in a venture with Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. Danisco estimates that the second-generation biofuel market, based on non-food organic materials, will grow to $75 billion in 10 years. Alliances with different companies will bring the company’s technology to new markets, CEO Knutzen said. “It’s an advantage for us if we don’t marry one partner, as one of the big players may be better for cooperating in one area, and another may be better for a different product,” the CEO said. “When the game gets really big, that could be in second-generation ethanol, we’re collaborating with the big players, who have the technology pieces that we miss and the financial muscle to grow.” ‘Obvious Target’ The Danish company, which traces its history back to a sugar beet grower formed in 1872, sold its commoditized sugar business to Germany’s Nordzucker AG for 5.45 billion kroner. Exiting sugar and Knutzen’s focus on growth markets for enzymes and additives like food cultures and artificial sweeteners have increased Danisco’s chances of being bought, analysts said. “Danisco is an obvious takeover target, and the share price has some speculation factored in,” said Rune Majlund Dahl , an analyst with Sydbank A/S. “It’s a more streamlined company after the sugar business was sold off. I’m not sure that the voting removal will have a huge effect.” Denmark’s biggest pension fund, ATP, is the only investor with a stake higher than 5 percent, according to Danisco’s Web site. R&D Clout Danisco’s improved outlook, outlined on May 6, kept pace with Novozymes, which lifted its forecast a week earlier. Biotechnology companies have recovered this year as the global economy emerges from a recession, fueling demand for enzymes used in baking and cleaning products. Novozymes still has the edge on profitability, with an earnings before interest and tax margin of 23 percent, double the 11.2 ratio of Danisco’s rival unit, Genencor. “It’s a matter of size, and economies of scale,” Knutzen said. “Their industrial enzyme business is twice the size of ours so they allocate more resources to research and development.” As a result, Genencor’s margin will always be “a few percentage points” lower than that of Novozymes, though Knutzen said he’s targeting profitability of above 15 percent. “The trend clearly shows that we will move above 15 percent. It’s something that will happen soon,” Knutzen said, declining to be more specific before June 22 , when Danisco provides a forecast for its next fiscal year. “I’m saying this with a lot of confidence. We will get there, we’re on track.” To contact the reporter on this story: Christian Wienberg in Copenhagen at cwienberg@bloomberg.net

Read the full article →

Offshore Wind Boom Gathers Pace as Utilities Seek 18% Margins

April 30, 2010

By Jeremy van Loon April 30 (Bloomberg) — E.ON AG and Vattenfall Europe AG are among utilities leading a worldwide push to develop offshore wind power, overcoming a lack of work ships, stormy seas and higher costs to make almost twice the profit they would on land. This week, they began running Germany’s first windmills in deep water, anchored more than 20 meters (66 feet) below the surface. Across the Atlantic, the U.S. approved plans two days ago for that nation’s first offshore turbines near Cape Cod. “Offshore technology is the future, with excellent growth potential and tremendous opportunities,” said Werner Brinker , chief executive officer of EWE AG, the German utility partner of Duesseldorf-based E.ON and Vattenfall in the 250 million-euro ($331 million) project in the North Sea. Investment in ocean-based windmills will rise about 30 percent this year to $3.9 billion, outpacing growth of less than 10 percent onshore, Bloomberg New Energy Finance estimated. Developers get more electricity output per turbine offshore, where winds blow 40 percent more often than on land, according to the European Wind Energy Association. European countries including Germany and the U.K. have most of the world’s operating offshore wind farms. Together they plan a 50-fold increase in installed sea-based wind towers in the coming decades. Their lead over developers in the U.S. may be challenged should the 130-turbine project in Nantucket Sound, Massachusetts, open the way for more project approvals. Harsh Conditions “Offshore wind power is viable, even in the harsh natural conditions of Germany,” said Vattenfall Europe CEO Tuomo Hatakka . In Britain, Prime Minister Gordon Brown has lured General Electric Co. , Siemens AG and Clipper Windpower Plc to erect projects that would generate 47 gigawatts of power, enough to supply all of Britain’s households. One gigawatt lights about 653,000 homes, according to RenewableUK. Germany plans about half as much, and 6.3 gigawatts are on the drawing boards in the U.S. and Canada. The return on investment for offshore developments are as high as 18 percent, said Martin Billhardt , chief executive officer of PNE Wind AG. That compares with returns of 9 percent to 12 percent for onshore projects. “Offshore can be very attractive for investors,” said Billhardt, whose Cuxhaven, Germany-based company is building two deep-water wind farms off the German coast. “The wind availability is really there.” Drawbacks Offshore While turbines anchored to the seabed promise more clean energy as the world weans itself from oil and coal, the offshore plants aren’t without drawbacks. They can cost twice as much as onshore rivals and require special ships, cables and engineering to allow them to withstand high winds and corrosive salt water. Floating cranes required to build and service wind farms are scarce, and most work ships now in use are “inappropriate” because they’ve been adapted from the oil industry, said Thomas Karst, a director at Make Consulting . The Danish company advising on investments in wind energy estimates that by 2015 there may be a 20 percent gap between the capacity of vessels and demand for their services. “There are simply too few vessels, and the ports are inadequate to handle all the heavy equipment,” Karst said. “These are serious supply chain issues.” Costs at Sea Costs to install a turbine at sea are about 4 million euros per megawatt of capacity, said Mortimer Menzel, a partner at the Augusta & Co. , a merchant bank. A turbine on land is about 1.5 million euros. Design flaws on some U.K.-based turbines may cost operators including Royal Dutch Shell Plc , Centrica Plc and Dong Energy A/S as much as 50 million pounds ($77 million) to fix, RenewableUK said April 14. “The barriers to entry are still very high,” Ditlev Engel , chief executive of Vestas Wind Systems A/S, the world’s largest maker of wind turbines. “Offshore definitely has a lot of potential, but it’s a small part of the overall market.” Utilities, because of their “large balance sheets,” have so far developed the most wind parks, said Grzegorz Zielinski of the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development , which provides financing for wind projects in Eastern Europe. With the new Alpha Ventus farm this week, Vattenfall increased its wind assets to 426 megawatts, closing in on Fredericia, Denmark-based Dong Energy, the world leader with 595 megawatts. RWE AG ’s Innogy unit leads the world in wind parks under development, according to New Energy Finance. Scarce Finance Costs and risks particular to sea-borne structures have led to insufficient lending from banks as financing fails to keep pace with the offshore industry’s expansion, said Marc Schmitz , a vice president at Rabobank Nederland NV . “There’s not enough bank debt in the market,” he said. “This is a real issue.” Banks demand twice as much equity from developers for offshore wind projects, or 30 percent of the total investment, than they do for onshore, Schmitz said. Most wind farm projects cost from 600 million euros to 1.5 billion euros to build. While the benefits of stronger, more frequent breezes offshore are evident to some investors, the risks imply the need for caution, said the EBRD’s Zielinski. “Offshore wind is not for the faint-hearted,” he said. “And you need deep pockets.” To contact the reporter on this story: Jeremy van Loon in Berlin at jvanloon@bloomberg.net .

Read the full article →

Windy Nights in Germany Bring Cash for Consumers Who Use More Electricity

April 23, 2010

By Jeremy van Loon April 23 (Bloomberg) — On windy nights in northern Germany, consumers are paid to keep the lights on. Twice this year the nation’s 21,000 wind turbines pumped out so much power that utilities lowered customer bills for using the surplus electricity. Since the first rebate came with little fanfare at 5 a.m. one October day in 2008, payments have risen as high as 500.02 euros ($665) a megawatt-hour, about as much as a small factory or 1,000 homes uses in 60 minutes. The wind-energy boom in Europe and parts of Texas has begun to reduce bills for consumers. Electricity-network managers have even ordered windmills offline at times to trim supplies. That hurts profit for wind-farm operators, said Christian Kjaer , head of the European Wind Energy Association, which represents RWE AG of Germany, Spain’s Iberdrola SA and Dong Energy A/S of Denmark. “We’re seeing that wind energy lowers prices, which is great for the consumers,” Kjaer said at his group’s conference in Warsaw this week. “We as producers have to acknowledge that this means operating the existing plant fewer hours a year, and this has an effect on investors” and profit. After years of getting government incentives to install windmills, operators in Europe may have become their own worst enemy, reducing the total price paid for electricity in Germany, Europe’s biggest power market, by as much as 5 billion euros some years, according to a study this week by Poeyry , a Helsinki-based industry consultant. Wind Capacity Germany has doubled capacity to generate power from wind since 2002 and has turbines producing about 7.5 percent of the nation’s electricity, according to the German Wind Energy Association . That compares with 4.8 percent for the European Union and about 1 percent in the U.S. The turbines operate about a third of the time and are idle in calm weather. “Wind is playing an important role in spot-price volatility because it’s very difficult to predict when more power is coming on line,” said Ruxandra Haradau-Doeser , an analyst at Bankhaus Metzler in Frankfurt. The erratic nature of weather makes it difficult for utilities to estimate by how much wind power pushes down revenue they earn from competing energy sources, such as natural gas. A spokeswoman at Bilbao, Spain-based Iberdrola, the world’s largest wind-power operator, declined to estimate. Spanish power prices fell an annual 26 percent in the first quarter because of the surge in supplies from wind and hydroelectric production, the Spanish wind-industry trade group said in a statement yesterday on its Web site . Negative Prices RWE, Germany’s second-largest utility, minimizes the risks of having to pay consumers to use power by using a “broad” range of different generation technologies in different markets, a spokesman for the company said. Negative prices do not have a big negative effect on the company, he said. The solution may be expanding markets further, Kjaer said. Tying European markets together, already done between the Netherlands, France and Belgium, lets temporary surpluses flow toward electricity-poor zones. Germany plans to join them on Sept. 7. Trading more electricity across markets reduces price volatility, spreading any excess capacity from wind and solar power plants across a broader area, he said. Storing electricity may be another fix. In Scandinavia, Danish wind power is used to pump water into Norwegian and Swedish reservoirs and later released to drive hydroelectric plants when the wind is not blowing. Power Trading Nord Pool, the Nasdaq OMX Group Inc. -owned Scandinavian power bourse, last year took steps to encourage generators to limit production by implementing a minimum price. The most generators would pay users to take their power is 200 euros per megawatt hour if there is excess electricity from too much wind. The measures are meant to “increase the effectiveness of the market forcing power generators to consider reducing their electricity generation or having to pay for delivering electricity,” the company said on its Web site. Wind’s impact on prices results from its “low marginal costs,” which pushes more expensive technologies including natural gas and coal out of the market, the Poeyry study said. Fossil-fuel burning relies on fuel, which can boost the price of electricity from those sources. Texas had so-called negative power prices in the first half of 2008 because wind turbines in the western part of the state weren’t adequately linked with more populated regions in the east, according to the Electricity Reliability Council of Texas . Discounts on Bills Until there’s more integration and better transmission grids, prices probably will fluctuate, leading to negative prices, in which payment to consumers is reflected as a discount on their monthly bills. That hasn’t yet stopped the expansion of wind power. China WindPower Group Ltd. , Iberdrola and Duke Energy Corp. will lead development of an estimated $65 billion of wind farms, according to Bloomberg New Energy Finance. Around the world, the potential output of electricity from wind is already 157.9 gigawatts, according to the Global Wind Energy Council , a Brussels-based industry group. “I haven’t yet seen that negative pricing is a danger to new projects,” said Andrew Garrad, chief executive officer of GL Garrad Hassan , a wind consulting company. “We do need to get the right market mechanisms in place” to better integrate wind power into energy grids. Wind power is as cheap as electricity made from burning coal on windy days, and those lower costs drive down power prices. In parts of Texas, some utilities are using wind power because it’s the cheapest form of energy, said Garrad. In Leipzig, Germany, home to the electricity market for Germany and Austria, and other electricity markets in Europe and the U.S., traders may have to be prepared for more volatility. More wind power reduces wholesale spot prices, Poeyry said. To contact the reporter on this story: Jeremy van Loon in Warsaw via jvanloon@bloomberg.net

Read the full article →

Euro Strengthens as Stocks, Commodities Gain on Greek Aid Plan

April 12, 2010

By Patrick Chu April 12 (Bloomberg) — The euro gained for a third day against the dollar, stocks climbed and commodities rose after European governments unveiled a plan to halt Greece’s fiscal crisis. Treasuries declined and Asia credit default swaps fell. Europe’s currency strengthened 1 percent against the dollar to $1.3649 at 4:12 p.m. in Tokyo and rose versus all 16 of its most-traded counterparts. The MSCI World Index added 0.4 percent, and Standard & Poor’s 500 Index futures advanced 0.2 percent. The Stoxx 600 increased 0.1 percent. Copper gained 0.6 percent and oil rose 0.3 percent. Shares in Thailand plummeted following anti-government riots in Bangkok that killed 21. Euro-region finance ministers pledged as much as 45 billion euros ($61 billion) in loans at below-market interest rates to help rescue debt-plagued Greece and restore confidence in the European currency, which weakened 4.8 percent against the dollar this year. The bailout, combined with expectations of faster economic growth in India and South Korea, improved investor sentiment in Asia, where the MSCI Asia Pacific Index rose 0.2 percent to 128.45. “The development in Greece is giving market sentiment a boost because it eases concerns of a default among European nations facing debt problems,” said Olan Caperina , a fund manager at Bank of the Philippine Islands, which manages $9.7 billion. “Investors have reasons to turn positive and put money into the markets.” Europe’s currency rose 1.2 percent to 127.37 yen and the Danish, Swedish, Swiss and Norwegian currencies led gains, all strengthening more than 0.7 percent versus the yen. Poland’s zloty declined against the euro as the nation’s president and central bank chief died in a weekend plane crash. Below-Market Loan European nations and the International Monetary Fund pledged to provide three-year loans with a rate of about 5 percent, compared with 6.98 percent on Greek three-year securities. Greek bonds may climb and the gains may cut the yield premium investors demand to hold Greek 10-year debt instead of benchmark German bunds. “This is very positive,” said David Keeble , head of fixed-income strategy at Credit Agricole Corporate and Investment Bank in London. “We have got some concrete numbers and that is just what the market wanted. I would be all over Greek bonds after this. The market will not get down to 5 percent, but it will trade close to that. Maybe about 50 basis points above.” The European agreement, aimed at stopping Greece’s financial distress from infecting the rest of the region, damped concerns about the viability of the euro, which was created in 1999. The pact also may remove an impediment to the global economic recovery now being led by Asian nations. Won Climbs South Korea’s won rose 0.5 percent to 1,113.05 per dollar, as the central bank raised its economic growth forecast and a rescue package for Greece boosted demand for higher-yielding assets. Copper in London traded near the $8,000-a-ton level as the dollar declined and after China’s imports surged in March on rising seasonal demand. The metal for delivery in three months gained to as much as $8,043.75 a metric ton before trading at $7,978.75. Aluminum advanced 0.7 percent to $2,422 a ton. Oil rose for the first time in four days, to $85.27 a barrel, as the dollar fell and China increased crude imports to meet surging demand. “China is playing a key role in underpinning global demand for commodities, including crude,” said Toby Hassall , a research analyst at CWA Global Markets Pty in Sydney. “The Greek rescue plan, which is going to be driving the markets today, resolves a lot of the uncertainty. A weaker dollar is a supportive element for oil prices.” Advancing stocks beat decliners by more than three to one on the MSCI Asia Pacific Index , where industrials and commodity producers rallied. Japan’s Nikkei 225 Stock Average increased 0.4 percent. BHP Billiton Ltd. , the world’s largest mining company, gained 1.2 percent to A$44.41, Mitsubishi Corp., Japan’s largest commodities trader, climbed 1.6 percent to 2,480 yen. Nintendo Co., a game maker that gets 34 percent of its revenue in Europe, increased 4 percent to 31,550 yen in Osaka. Toyota Motor Corp., the Japanese carmaker that gets 31 percent of its revenue in North America, rose 0.5 percent to 3,725 yen after U.S. wholesale inventories climbed more than estimated. Futures on the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index climbed following the index’s 0.7 percent advance on April 9 to the highest close since September 2008. Inventories at U.S. wholesalers rose 0.6 percent in February, suggesting businesses are ramping up orders, a Commerce Department report showed. Economists had estimated a 0.4 percent increase. Thai Stocks The Stock Exchange of Thailand index plunged 5.1 percent, the biggest drop in six months, after a clash between soldiers and protesters left as many as 21 people dead. Overseas investors sold a net 3.2 billion baht ($99 million) of Thai equities in the past two trading days, the most since Feb. 8, ending 31 days of buying. “Some overseas investors will be so jittery that they may rush to reduce their investments,” said Vana Bulbon , chief executive officer of UOB Asset Management (Thailand) Co., which oversees $1.6 billion. “No one expected that many deaths and this situation further worsens the political crisis.” Treasury Yields Investors sought higher-yielding assets. The two-year Treasury note yield rose three basis points to 1.09 percent in Tokyo, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. The cost of protecting Asia-Pacific bonds from default declined as the European rescue package for Greece helped calm investors, according to traders of credit-default swaps. The Markit iTraxx Australia index dropped 7 basis points to 77.5 basis points in Sydney, according to Citigroup Inc. The Markit iTraxx Asia index of 50 investment-grade borrowers outside Japan declined 7 basis points to 89 in Singapore, Citigroup prices show. Both risk benchmarks are at their lowest since Jan. 12, according to CMA DataVision in New York. The Markit iTraxx Japan index fell 5 basis points to 90 in Tokyo, its lowest since June 2008, Deutsche Bank AG and CMA prices show. The zloty fell 0.3 percent to 3.8806 per euro after the weekend plane crash that killed Poland’s president and central bank chief. It gained 0.7 percent to 2.8457 per dollar. President Lech Kaczynski, central bank Governor Slawomir Skrzypek and leaders of the opposition and military were among 96 people who died en route to commemorate the Soviet massacre of 22,000 Polish officials near Russia’s Katyn forest. To contact the reporters for this story: Patrick Chu in Tokyo at pachu@bloomberg.net

Read the full article →

Euro Strengthens as Stocks, Commodities Rally on Greek Rescue; Bonds Fall

April 12, 2010

By Patrick Chu April 12 (Bloomberg) — The euro gained for a third day against the dollar, stocks climbed and commodities rose after European governments unveiled a plan to halt Greece’s fiscal crisis. Treasuries declined and Asia credit default swaps fell. Europe’s currency strengthened 1 percent against the dollar to $1.3649 at 4:12 p.m. in Tokyo and rose versus all 16 of its most-traded counterparts. The MSCI World Index added 0.4 percent, and Standard & Poor’s 500 Index futures advanced 0.2 percent. The Stoxx 600 increased 0.1 percent. Copper gained 0.6 percent and oil rose 0.3 percent. Shares in Thailand plummeted following anti-government riots in Bangkok that killed 21. Euro-region finance ministers pledged as much as 45 billion euros ($61 billion) in loans at below-market interest rates to help rescue debt-plagued Greece and restore confidence in the European currency, which weakened 4.8 percent against the dollar this year. The bailout, combined with expectations of faster economic growth in India and South Korea, improved investor sentiment in Asia, where the MSCI Asia Pacific Index rose 0.2 percent to 128.45. “The development in Greece is giving market sentiment a boost because it eases concerns of a default among European nations facing debt problems,” said Olan Caperina , a fund manager at Bank of the Philippine Islands, which manages $9.7 billion. “Investors have reasons to turn positive and put money into the markets.” Europe’s currency rose 1.2 percent to 127.37 yen and the Danish, Swedish, Swiss and Norwegian currencies led gains, all strengthening more than 0.7 percent versus the yen. Poland’s zloty declined against the euro as the nation’s president and central bank chief died in a weekend plane crash. Below-Market Loan European nations and the International Monetary Fund pledged to provide three-year loans with a rate of about 5 percent, compared with 6.98 percent on Greek three-year securities. Greek bonds may climb and the gains may cut the yield premium investors demand to hold Greek 10-year debt instead of benchmark German bunds. “This is very positive,” said David Keeble , head of fixed-income strategy at Credit Agricole Corporate and Investment Bank in London. “We have got some concrete numbers and that is just what the market wanted. I would be all over Greek bonds after this. The market will not get down to 5 percent, but it will trade close to that. Maybe about 50 basis points above.” The European agreement, aimed at stopping Greece’s financial distress from infecting the rest of the region, damped concerns about the viability of the euro, which was created in 1999. The pact also may remove an impediment to the global economic recovery now being led by Asian nations. Won Climbs South Korea’s won rose 0.5 percent to 1,113.05 per dollar, as the central bank raised its economic growth forecast and a rescue package for Greece boosted demand for higher-yielding assets. Copper in London traded near the $8,000-a-ton level as the dollar declined and after China’s imports surged in March on rising seasonal demand. The metal for delivery in three months gained to as much as $8,043.75 a metric ton before trading at $7,978.75. Aluminum advanced 0.7 percent to $2,422 a ton. Oil rose for the first time in four days, to $85.27 a barrel, as the dollar fell and China increased crude imports to meet surging demand. “China is playing a key role in underpinning global demand for commodities, including crude,” said Toby Hassall , a research analyst at CWA Global Markets Pty in Sydney. “The Greek rescue plan, which is going to be driving the markets today, resolves a lot of the uncertainty. A weaker dollar is a supportive element for oil prices.” Advancing stocks beat decliners by more than three to one on the MSCI Asia Pacific Index , where industrials and commodity producers rallied. Japan’s Nikkei 225 Stock Average increased 0.4 percent. BHP Billiton Ltd. , the world’s largest mining company, gained 1.2 percent to A$44.41, Mitsubishi Corp., Japan’s largest commodities trader, climbed 1.6 percent to 2,480 yen. Nintendo Co., a game maker that gets 34 percent of its revenue in Europe, increased 4 percent to 31,550 yen in Osaka. Toyota Motor Corp., the Japanese carmaker that gets 31 percent of its revenue in North America, rose 0.5 percent to 3,725 yen after U.S. wholesale inventories climbed more than estimated. Futures on the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index climbed following the index’s 0.7 percent advance on April 9 to the highest close since September 2008. Inventories at U.S. wholesalers rose 0.6 percent in February, suggesting businesses are ramping up orders, a Commerce Department report showed. Economists had estimated a 0.4 percent increase. Thai Stocks The Stock Exchange of Thailand index plunged 5.1 percent, the biggest drop in six months, after a clash between soldiers and protesters left as many as 21 people dead. Overseas investors sold a net 3.2 billion baht ($99 million) of Thai equities in the past two trading days, the most since Feb. 8, ending 31 days of buying. “Some overseas investors will be so jittery that they may rush to reduce their investments,” said Vana Bulbon , chief executive officer of UOB Asset Management (Thailand) Co., which oversees $1.6 billion. “No one expected that many deaths and this situation further worsens the political crisis.” Treasury Yields Investors sought higher-yielding assets. The two-year Treasury note yield rose three basis points to 1.09 percent in Tokyo, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. The cost of protecting Asia-Pacific bonds from default declined as the European rescue package for Greece helped calm investors, according to traders of credit-default swaps. The Markit iTraxx Australia index dropped 7 basis points to 77.5 basis points in Sydney, according to Citigroup Inc. The Markit iTraxx Asia index of 50 investment-grade borrowers outside Japan declined 7 basis points to 89 in Singapore, Citigroup prices show. Both risk benchmarks are at their lowest since Jan. 12, according to CMA DataVision in New York. The Markit iTraxx Japan index fell 5 basis points to 90 in Tokyo, its lowest since June 2008, Deutsche Bank AG and CMA prices show. The zloty fell 0.3 percent to 3.8806 per euro after the weekend plane crash that killed Poland’s president and central bank chief. It gained 0.7 percent to 2.8457 per dollar. President Lech Kaczynski, central bank Governor Slawomir Skrzypek and leaders of the opposition and military were among 96 people who died en route to commemorate the Soviet massacre of 22,000 Polish officials near Russia’s Katyn forest. To contact the reporters for this story: Patrick Chu in Tokyo at pachu@bloomberg.net

Read the full article →

Stocks, Euro, Greek Bonds Advance on Speculation of Bailout

April 9, 2010

By Whitney Kisling and David Merritt April 9 (Bloomberg) — Stocks rose and Greek bonds rallied for the first time in two weeks on speculation Europe’s most indebted nation will get an international bailout to avert a default. The euro jumped 0.8 percent against the dollar. Stocks and the euro briefly trimmed their advance as Fitch Ratings cut Greece’s debt ratings to the lowest investment grade, before resuming gains that sent the MSCI World Index of 23 developed nations’ stocks to near its highest in 18 months and the euro to its strongest versus the dollar in almost a week. The Standard & Poor’s 500 Index rose 0.4 percent at 11:34 a.m. in New York. The premium investors demand to hold Greek ten-year notes instead of benchmark German debt narrowed 29 basis points as European officials said they’re ready to come to Greece’s rescue if needed. “They have to be given some help from Europe or the IMF at concessional rates,” billionaire investor George Soros said in an interview on Bloomberg Radio in Cambridge, England. “It is a make or break time for the euro and it’s a question whether the political will to hold Europe together is there or not.” European Union officials are “ready to act” on financial assistance for Greece, European Commission spokeswoman Amelia Torres said in Brussels. U.S. stocks extended gains earlier as government data showed wholesale inventories rose more than forecast in February, a sign companies are increasing orders as sales climbed to the highest level in more than a year. Greek Yields Retreat Yields on Greek two-year notes fell 44 basis points to 6.93 percent after rising more than 200 basis points in the past three weeks. National Bank of Greece SA, the nation’s biggest lender, rallied 8.1 percent, snapping a three-day, 17 percent plunge. Energy and consumer shares led the gains in U.S. stocks, with Exxon Mobil Corp. rising 1.2 percent and Walt Disney Co. advancing 2.3 percent. Treasuries fell, paring weekly gains, as speculation Greece will avoid default reduced demand for the relative safety of U.S. government debt. The 10-year note’s yield rose 2 basis points, or 0.02 percentage point, to 3.91 percent. The Dollar Index, which tracks the currency against six major trading partners, slid 0.7 percent to 80.981. The New Zealand dollar, Danish krone and euro led gains against the dollar, rising at least 0.9 percent. Only the Canadian dollar fell against the U.S. currency among the 16 most active counterparts tracked by Bloomberg. Europe Rallies The Stoxx Europe 600 Index climbed 1.1 percent as banks and commodity producers led gains by all 19 industry groups. The benchmark gauge of equities in 18 western European nations headed for its sixth straight weekly gain, the longest winning streak in a year. Givaudan SA, the world’s biggest maker of flavors and fragrances, surged 5.1 percent in Zurich after saying sales advanced. The MSCI Asia Pacific Index rose 0.4 percent. Macarthur Coal Ltd. jumped 8.3 percent in Sydney after rejecting a A$3.64 billion ($3.4 billion) bid from New Hope Corp., which is vying with Peabody Energy Corp. and Noble Group Ltd. for control of the world’s biggest producer of pulverized coal. Xstrata Plc, the world’s fourth-largest copper producer, rose 2.5 percent in London after saying it approached Macarthur shareholders Posco and ArcelorMittal about a potential rival bid. Eastern Europe led a rebound in emerging-market stocks, with Hungary’s Budapest Stock Exchange Index gaining 1.5 percent and the Czech PX Index climbing 1.2 percent. The Micex Index in Russia advanced 1.4 percent while the ruble strengthened 0.9 percent against the dollar. Turkey’s lira added 0.6 percent. Copper for delivery in three months rose 0.6 percent to $7,940 a metric ton on the London Metal Exchange. Aluminum advanced to its highest level since October 2008. Gold for immediate delivery added 1 percent to $1,161.70 an ounce, for a fifth consecutive gain. Crude oil erased gains, slipping 0.5 percent to $84.97 a barrel in New York. To contact the reporters on this story: Whitney Kisling in New York at wkisling@bloomberg.net ; David Merritt in London on dmerritt1@bloomberg.net .

Read the full article →

Stocks, Euro, Greek Bonds Advance on Speculation of International Bailout

April 9, 2010

By Whitney Kisling and David Merritt April 9 (Bloomberg) — Stocks rose and Greek bonds rallied for the first time in two weeks on speculation Europe’s most indebted nation will get an international bailout to avert a default. The euro jumped 0.8 percent against the dollar. Stocks and the euro briefly trimmed their advance as Fitch Ratings cut Greece’s debt ratings to the lowest investment grade, before resuming gains that sent the MSCI World Index of 23 developed nations’ stocks to near its highest in 18 months and the euro to its strongest versus the dollar in almost a week. The Standard & Poor’s 500 Index rose 0.4 percent at 11:34 a.m. in New York. The premium investors demand to hold Greek ten-year notes instead of benchmark German debt narrowed 29 basis points as European officials said they’re ready to come to Greece’s rescue if needed. “They have to be given some help from Europe or the IMF at concessional rates,” billionaire investor George Soros said in an interview on Bloomberg Radio in Cambridge, England. “It is a make or break time for the euro and it’s a question whether the political will to hold Europe together is there or not.” European Union officials are “ready to act” on financial assistance for Greece, European Commission spokeswoman Amelia Torres said in Brussels. U.S. stocks extended gains earlier as government data showed wholesale inventories rose more than forecast in February, a sign companies are increasing orders as sales climbed to the highest level in more than a year. Greek Yields Retreat Yields on Greek two-year notes fell 44 basis points to 6.93 percent after rising more than 200 basis points in the past three weeks. National Bank of Greece SA, the nation’s biggest lender, rallied 8.1 percent, snapping a three-day, 17 percent plunge. Energy and consumer shares led the gains in U.S. stocks, with Exxon Mobil Corp. rising 1.2 percent and Walt Disney Co. advancing 2.3 percent. Treasuries fell, paring weekly gains, as speculation Greece will avoid default reduced demand for the relative safety of U.S. government debt. The 10-year note’s yield rose 2 basis points, or 0.02 percentage point, to 3.91 percent. The Dollar Index, which tracks the currency against six major trading partners, slid 0.7 percent to 80.981. The New Zealand dollar, Danish krone and euro led gains against the dollar, rising at least 0.9 percent. Only the Canadian dollar fell against the U.S. currency among the 16 most active counterparts tracked by Bloomberg. Europe Rallies The Stoxx Europe 600 Index climbed 1.1 percent as banks and commodity producers led gains by all 19 industry groups. The benchmark gauge of equities in 18 western European nations headed for its sixth straight weekly gain, the longest winning streak in a year. Givaudan SA, the world’s biggest maker of flavors and fragrances, surged 5.1 percent in Zurich after saying sales advanced. The MSCI Asia Pacific Index rose 0.4 percent. Macarthur Coal Ltd. jumped 8.3 percent in Sydney after rejecting a A$3.64 billion ($3.4 billion) bid from New Hope Corp., which is vying with Peabody Energy Corp. and Noble Group Ltd. for control of the world’s biggest producer of pulverized coal. Xstrata Plc, the world’s fourth-largest copper producer, rose 2.5 percent in London after saying it approached Macarthur shareholders Posco and ArcelorMittal about a potential rival bid. Eastern Europe led a rebound in emerging-market stocks, with Hungary’s Budapest Stock Exchange Index gaining 1.5 percent and the Czech PX Index climbing 1.2 percent. The Micex Index in Russia advanced 1.4 percent while the ruble strengthened 0.9 percent against the dollar. Turkey’s lira added 0.6 percent. Copper for delivery in three months rose 0.6 percent to $7,940 a metric ton on the London Metal Exchange. Aluminum advanced to its highest level since October 2008. Gold for immediate delivery added 1 percent to $1,161.70 an ounce, for a fifth consecutive gain. Crude oil erased gains, slipping 0.5 percent to $84.97 a barrel in New York. To contact the reporters on this story: Whitney Kisling in New York at wkisling@bloomberg.net ; David Merritt in London on dmerritt1@bloomberg.net .

Read the full article →

Mumbai Terror Plot Suspect Headley Will Change Plea to Guilty, Lawyer Says

March 16, 2010

By Andrew M. Harris March 16 (Bloomberg) — David Coleman Headley, who is accused of helping to plan the November 2008 Mumbai terror attacks and a never-executed assault on a Danish newspaper that printed cartoons of the Islamic prophet Muhammad, will change his plea of innocent to a plea of guilty before a U.S. judge in Chicago on March 18, his attorney said in a telephone interview today. To contact the reporter on this story: Andrew M Harris in Chicago at aharris16@bloomberg.net

Read the full article →

Gates Lands in Kabul to Assess Progress of Military Surge Against Taliban

March 7, 2010

By Viola Gienger March 8 (Bloomberg) — U.S. Defense Secretary Robert Gates landed in Afghanistan today on a visit to assess the progress of President Barack Obama ’s military surge against the Taliban. Gates arrives after NATO-led troops and Afghan soldiers wrested the town of Marjah in Helmand Province from the Taliban. The 15,000-person operation has restored security, while it may take months for Afghan civilian officials to win Marjah residents’ support, commanders have said. The defense secretary said he will examine Afghan President Hamid Karzai ’s plan to hold a peace loya jirga, or council, in April to persuade Taliban leaders to end their insurgency and join the government. It’s not premature to outline conditions fighters must meet, Gates said. “We ought not get too impatient,” Gates told reporters traveling on his plane to Kabul for the unannounced trip from Washington. “It’s their country, it’s their fight. We’re there to help, and how the politics play out in the end game will have to be an Afghan-led endeavor, as far as I’m concerned.” The visit is the second for Gates since Obama’s December decision to expand the U.S. force to 100,000 this year in a bid to reverse Taliban gains and train the Afghans to begin taking over in July 2011. The Marjah offensive is a prelude to a larger and, officials have said, more difficult campaign ahead in neighboring Kandahar Province. Opium-Region Focus About 6,000 of the additional 30,000 U.S. troops Obama authorized in December are on the ground, and officials still expect the full complement to arrive by the end of August, Gates said. Most of the supplemental force will focus on the southern, opium-poppy growing provinces of Helmand and Kandahar and on eastern Afghanistan. Military commanders said they’re pleased with the results of the push into Marjah by Afghan soldiers aided by American, British, Danish and Estonian troops. As of March 4, U.S. Marines were 21 days into what they expect will be a 30-day assault, known as Operation Moshtarak. They had gone eight days without a direct exchange of gunfire, Brigadier General Lawrence Nicholson told reporters at the Pentagon last week. The coalition intends to leave two battalions in Marjah until later this year to ensure continued security. ‘Very Fragile Area’ “We’re very conscious of the fact that this is a very fragile area,” said Nicholson, who commands the 2nd Marine Expeditionary Brigade, based at Camp Lejeune, North Carolina. The biggest concern is whether the successful handover of power to Afghan civil servants, many of them only recently trained by the coalition, will stick. The U.S. and its partners are supporting Helmand Governor Mohammad Gulab Mangal’s efforts to rally support with shuras, or community leader meetings, projects such as roads and schools and improved security. “We’ve got a very skeptical population here,” Nicholson said. “The population here is concerned about what we’re going to be able to do for them. I think they’re a little tainted by their former experiences under the Afghan government.” Gates cautioned against excessive optimism too early after the relatively smooth Marjah campaign and recent captures of Taliban leaders in Afghanistan and Pakistan. “I don’t think we should” read too much into specific, positive signs, he said. ‘Hard Days Ahead’ U.S. Army General Stanley McChrystal , the top commander for the 43-nation coalition in Afghanistan, said four weeks ago that while the situation was still serious, it had stopped deteriorating. Gates said that assessment still holds. “People still need to understand there is some very hard fighting, very hard days ahead,” he said. Gates may also need to shore up support for the war among allies in the coalition led by the North Atlantic Treaty Organization . The Netherlands is set to begin withdrawing its 2,000 members in August, while some other nations stepped up after Obama’s December announcement with promises to raise their numbers by 9,000 troops to almost 50,000. NATO Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen told a Brussels press conference on March 3 he didn’t know how the coalition would replace the 2,000-member Dutch force. The Dutch government collapsed Feb. 20 over the Labor Party’s refusal to extend the mission of Dutch troops in Uruzgan Province, seen by NATO as a model for peacekeeping and economic development. To contact the reporter on this story: Viola Gienger in Kabul via vgienger@bloomberg.net .

Read the full article →

Afghan, U.S. Forces Swoop Down on Taliban Stronghold in Southern Offensive

February 12, 2010

By Viola Gienger Feb. 13 (Bloomberg) — U.S. Marines joined by British and Afghan soldiers began an assault on a Taliban stronghold in southern Afghanistan early today in what may be one of the biggest offensives of the war. A U.S. military official who asked not to be identified confirmed the operation was under way against insurgents in the town of Marjah in Helmand province. Coalition forces led by the North Atlantic Treaty Organization have talked openly for weeks about the impending action in an effort to persuade Taliban militants to give up and warn the population so residents can flee. The town, located about 25 miles (40 kilometers) southwest of the provincial capital Lashkar Gah, is considered one of the country’s biggest opium-production centers. U.S. Army General Stanley McChrystal , the top U.S. and NATO commander in Afghanistan, said the offensive’s goal is to connect other areas of Helmand that the Marines and British, Danish and Estonian troops recaptured in the past year. “We’re expanding that, increasing the areas that will be under government of Afghanistan control,” McChrystal told reporters on the sidelines of a NATO defense ministers meeting in Istanbul on Feb. 4. The offensive is the first major combat test for some of the 50,000 reinforcements President Barack Obama has authorized for Afghanistan since taking office. Their aim is to reverse Taliban territorial gains, protect civilians and train Afghan forces to start taking over parts of the country in July 2011. “This is the next example of the evolution and, I guess, the maturation of the capacity” of coalition and Afghan forces,” McChrystal said. Karzai Meeting The offensive began a few hours after Afghan President Hamid Karzai agreed to the attack following discussions with McChrystal and U.S. Ambassador Karl Eikenberry , the Washington Post reported, citing unidentified U.S. officials. The Associated Press reported earlier from the Marjah area on the beginning of the offensive, saying troops were ferried into the town by helicopter before dawn. Dubbed Operation Moshtarak, which means “Together” in the Dari language, the offensive will be the largest joint operation to date between Afghan and coalition forces, according to a Feb. 11 report by Jeffrey Dressler, an analyst at the Institute for the Study of War in Washington. The campaign may include as many as 15,000 coalition and Afghan troops, wrote Dressler, who recently briefed a Marine Battalion at Camp Lejeune, North Carolina, prior to deployment. British Major General Gordon Messenger said Feb. 7 that the offensive probably will involve heavy fighting with insurgents. Taliban Hub Marjah became “a major command and control” hub for the Taliban and narcotics traders “after U.S. Marines drove insurgents out of their previous sanctuary” to the south in Germser in April 2008, Dressler said. Marjah’s population probably is less than 50,000, he said. A three-day operation last May against one of two main bazaars that host the insurgency netted the largest drug cache in Afghanistan to date and resulted in the deaths of 47 militants, according to Dressler. Coalition and Afghan commanders have been meeting with local leaders to plan the operation and find ways of protecting the population. McChrystal said the planning for the offensive has been led by the governor of Helmand Province and supported by the relevant government ministries. To contact the reporter on this story: Viola Gienger in Washington at vgienger@bloomberg.net .

Read the full article →

Centrica Wind-Farm Funding Success Shows Improved Liquidity for U.K. Sites

January 5, 2010

By Kari Lundgren Jan. 5 (Bloomberg) — Centrica Plc’s deal to fund U.K. offshore wind farms through a stake sale and bank debt may become a blueprint for competitors in the country’s $160 billion push to develop sites in deeper and more remote waters. The Crown Estate, the authority which administers 55 percent of the coastline on behalf of the monarchy, is assessing bids from 18 companies in its third offshore wind licensing round and aims to quadruple planned capacity by adding farms in the North Sea, Irish Sea and English Channel. It anticipates announcing winners, who will need to find financing, this month. Centrica, the U.K.’s largest utility, sold 50 percent of three projects to Societe Generale’s TCW Group in October and was able to raise 340 million pounds ($550 million) in debt for the sites, freeing up cash. Denmark’s Dong Energy A/S traded stakes in U.K. wind projects last month, while Germany’s E.ON AG sold an asset in the Thames estuary in 2008. “The number of banks comfortable with financing offshore wind is fairly limited and the Centrica deal has expanded that base,” said Marcel Gerritsen , global head of renewable energy and infrastructure finance at Rabobank Nederland NV. “It creates additional liquidity in the offshore wind farm U.K. area, which is necessary given the pipeline of projects coming up.” Centrica’s refinancing freed up funds for investment in new areas, amid a revival in lending as the credit crisis abated. Utilities will need to tap sources such as infrastructure funds and attract new banks for financing, according to Sarwjit Sambhi , managing director of power generation at Centrica. London Array “There are still a lot of round two projects that need to be built,” Sambhi said. “Once we’ve done those, then it’s all about how you fund the build-out of round three, and that’s going to be more challenging.” E.ON in 2008 sold a 20 percent stake in London Array , planned as the world’s biggest offshore farm, to Abu Dhabi’s Masdar . Dong, partnered by Siemens Project Ventures, bought 50 percent of the Lincs offshore wind-farm from Centrica last month, while the Danish company sold a 25 percent stake in the Irish Sea Walney project to Scottish & Southern Energy Plc. “The amount of capital needed to build all those wind farms is extremely large and utilities will need to bring in third-party investors,” said Jean-Daniel Borgeaud , a managing director at TCW, a Los-Angeles-based investment company. “It’s a new trend. If you had asked me two years ago if we’d work with Centrica I would have said no because utilities have typically used their own balance sheets.” U.K. Target Five wind parks are under construction, including Scottish & Southern’s 504-megawatt Greater Gabbard project, Dong’s Gunfleet Sands I and II and Swedish Vattenfall AB’s 300-megawatt Thanet project. Another 10 have been approved. “People are looking at different ways of sharing the cost and the risk,” Dave Rogers, E.ON’s U.K. director of renewable energy , said in an interview. “These are very large investments and the time-scale in which they need to be committed is relatively short.” The U.K. is targeting 15 percent of energy from renewable sources in 2020, of which 70 percent will have to come from offshore projects, according to the Carbon Trust. The Crown Estate is seeking to add 25,000 megawatts in the third round, up from a combined 8,000 megawatts in the first rounds, and estimates potential market investment at 100 billion pounds. The U.K. has nine operating offshore farms with capacity of about 690 megawatts, enough for 400,000 homes, according to the British Wind Energy Association . Spreading Risk Declared bidders among 18 companies competing in the third round include Scottish & Southern, RWE AG , E.ON, Iberdrola SA ’s Scottish Power unit, Dong and Vattenfall as well as Norway’s Statoil ASA , Statkraft AS and Fred. Olsen Renewables Ltd. Centrica is also likely to make an offer, given the proximity of several of its fields to new sites, Credit Suisse Group AG analyst Mark Freshney said. Centrica spokesman Julian Mears declined to comment yesterday. “We will look into all kinds of financing when it comes up,” said Bjorn Drangsholt, head of Statkraft’s offshore wind power department. “There are a number of alternatives to be investigated.” The U.K. government supports offshore wind by handing out two so-called Renewable Obligations Certificates per megawatt- hour of output to generators, which can be sold on to suppliers needing them to meet clean energy targets. An average offshore wind turbine generates enough power in a year to supply 2,500 households. Debt Refinanced Across Europe, about a dozen offshore projects are likely to seek debt financing in the coming year, including the Blackstone Group LP -backed Meerwind project in Germany and C- Power NV’s Belgian Thornton Bank farm, according to Jerome Guillet, head of energy project finance at Dexia SA. Centrica refinanced debt on its Lynn and Inner Dowsing offshore farms and the land-based Glens of Foudland wind farm by tapping non-recourse financing, which secures loans with cash generated by projects rather than the balance sheet. Fourteen banks, including Mitsubishi UFJ, KfW IPEX-Bank GmbH, Dexia and Rabobank, were behind the Centrica loan. “It’s still difficult to get financing, but the market is slowly coming together,” said Alexander von Dobschuetz, head of structured finance at Munich-based bank Bayerische Landesbank. “The proposed structures and risk allocations are becoming more appropriate.” To contact the reporter on this story: Kari Lundgren in London at klundgren2@bloomberg.net

Read the full article →

Al-Qaeda-Linked Somali Man Is Shot by Police in Home of Danish Cartoonist

January 1, 2010

By Gelu Sulugiuc Jan. 2 (Bloomberg) — A Somali man with ties to al-Qaeda was shot as he broke into the home of Kurt Westergaard , the Danish cartoonist who depicted Islam’s prophet Mohammed, in a “terror-related” act, the Danish Security and Intelligence Service said. Police shot the 28-year-old and wounded him in the knee and hand as he entered the cartoonist’s Aarhus home armed with a knife and a hatchet yesterday, the service said in a statement on its Web site . He was then arrested and charged with attempted murder, the statement said. Westergaard, 74, drew one of 12 cartoons of the prophet Mohammed published in 2005 in the Danish newspaper Jyllands- Posten . His drawing depicted the prophet with a bomb in his turban. The cartoons sparked riots in several Muslim countries that ended with the deaths of more than 50 people. Danish authorities did not release the name of the Somali, who they said had a residence permit in Denmark. The security service said he had close ties with the Somali terrorist organization al-Shabaab and with al-Qaeda leaders in East Africa. “This confirms once again the terrorist threat directed against Denmark and against cartoonist Kurt Westergaard in particular,” said Jakob Scharf, the security service chief. “The security measures introduced to protect Kurt Westergaard have proven effective.” Jyllands-Posten cited Westergaard as saying that he sought shelter in a bathroom modified into a safe room. In 2008, three other men were arrested for plotting to kill Westergaard. To contact the reporter responsible for this story: Gelu Sulugiuc in Copenhagen at gsulugiuc@bloomberg.net

Read the full article →

Danish fund ups in pharma to 30%

December 31, 2009

HCM CITY – Vien Dong Pharmaceuticals Co (DVD) has completed the private placement of 3 million shares to its Danish strategic partner, BankInvest’s Private Equity New Markets (PENM) fund, at a price of VND80,500 (US$4.40) per share. With this

Read the full article →

Climate Deal Brokered by U.S., China May Give Obama More Sway in Senate

December 20, 2009

By Jim Efstathiou Jr. and Kim Chipman Dec. 21 (Bloomberg) — The first offer by China and India to limit greenhouse gases in a global agreement may help U.S. President Barack Obama win over members of the Senate who don’t want to impose similar restrictions on American companies. The accord brokered by the three countries last week at United Nations talks in Copenhagen , while not legally binding, also calls for international verification. That addresses demands by senators who oppose UN rules that may hurt U.S. businesses’ ability to compete in the global marketplace. “The agreement helps us politically deal with the concerns that we would be putting American manufacturers at a disadvantage,” Senator Benjamin Cardin , a Maryland Democrat, said in an interview on Dec. 19, the day most of the world’s nations endorsed a framework termed the Copenhagen Accord. The plan calls for another year of talks for a treaty to tackle global warming by capping emissions and expanding the $120 billion carbon market. A U.S. law allowing carbon trading would move the market’s “center of gravity” from London to New York and Chicago, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP said today . Some senators may never reverse their opposition to U.S. climate-protection legislation because China won’t follow through with its new duties, Senator James Inhofe of Oklahoma said last week. China and India are the largest and fourth- largest producers of gases from burning fossil fuels. Inhofe, a Republican, has called the idea of man-made global warming a “hoax.” He spent a few hours in Copenhagen to ensure nations wouldn’t be “deceived into thinking the U.S. would pass cap-and-trade legislation,” the incentive system that requires emission permits and lets companies trade them. ‘First Step’ The Copenhagen Accord, called a “first step,” by Obama, may sway a few legislators to his side because it doesn’t legally bind the U.S. to limits imposed by other countries. “The agreement probably isn’t sufficient to win over conservative Republican votes, but may be sufficient to provide political cover for moderate Democratic votes from the coal and rural states,” said Robert Stavins , director of the Harvard Environmental Economics Program in Cambridge, Massachusetts. The U.S. president arrived at UN-led climate talks last week hindered by his own legislative priorities. Congressional debate over U.S. health care has put a climate-protection bill on the backburner until next year. Lack of legislation from the Senate, the only U.S. body authorized to approve treaties, left U.S. negotiators without clear guidelines on what lawmakers would accept in an accord. The strongest message to date from the Senate on global climate policy remains a 1998 resolution rejecting the existing Kyoto Protocol because it requires industrialized nations to cut emissions, not developing countries such as China and India. Emissions Pledges The Copenhagen Accord gives nations until Feb. 1 to offer emissions pledges. It’s unclear whether reductions will reach levels scientists say are needed to limit heat-trapping gases they blame for global warming. Bolivia, Sudan and Venezuela were among countries that spoke out against the accord that analysts say will still provide impetus to U.S. legislators. “The Senate needed assurances that the U.S. is not stepping out alone,” Eric Haxthausen , climate policy director for Nature Conservancy, the Arlington, Virginia-based advisory group headed by Mark Tercek , former environmental markets chief at Goldman Sachs Group Inc. The UN climate summit that ended Dec. 19, “as messy as it was, was sufficient to deliver on that objective.” The agreement fell short of unanimous support from UN members. It lacked the teeth of a treaty that was wanted by many of the 193 nations at the conference. The environmental group Friends of the Earth called it a failure. Unprecedented Kumi Naidoo, executive director of Greenpeace International, said the accord lacks strong emissions targets and provides concessions to fossil fuel industries. “Averting climate chaos has just gotten a whole lot harder,” Naidoo said in a statement. U.S. Senator Barbara Boxer , the California Democrat who heads a committee that drafted a climate change bill, said the deal was unprecedented. “For the first time, the world’s major emitting countries, including China and India, have committed to specific actions to cut greenhouse gas pollution,” Boxer said in Dec. 18 statement. “While there is more work to do, the progress made today will add to the momentum here at home for legislation,” to curb emissions. Trail of Legislation The U.S. House in June passed legislation that calls for a 17 percent reduction in emissions by 2020. The Senate may take up a similar measure in next year. Most Republicans oppose climate change legislation they claim will raise energy prices just as the U.S. is emerging from a recession. About half of U.S. electricity comes from burning coal, the most polluting fossil fuel and the most at risk, and the reliance in Indiana is 94 percent, according to the American Coalition for Clean Coal Electricity, an industry group that supports coal. In Ohio, coal provides 86 percent of power. Prior to the two-week conference in the Danish capital, nine U.S. senators sent a letter to Obama warning that bad climate policy could hurt U.S. companies and workers without improving the environment. Any accord should require “all major economies to adopt ambitious, measurable and verifiable actions,” according the Dec. 3 letter signed by senators from states such as Ohio, Michigan and Pennsylvania. The Copenhagen agreement, which calls for international measurement, reporting and verification of emissions cutting by poorer nations, was reached after Obama had last-minute talks with Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao , Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh , Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva and South African President, Jacob Zuma . The accord carries more weight because it was reached in face-to-face meetings between the leaders, Haxthausen said. “Rather than having an agreement that was hammered out by negotiators, this was an extraordinary situation where the leaders came together and agreed to something,” he said. “You have the pledges of these leaders personally to each other.” To contact the reporters on this story: Jim Efstathiou Jr . in Copenhagen at jefstathiou@bloomberg.net Kim Chipman in Copenhagen at kchipman@bloomberg.net

Read the full article →

Climate Deal Brokered by U.S., China May Give Obama More Sway in Senate

December 20, 2009

By Jim Efstathiou Jr. and Kim Chipman Dec. 21 (Bloomberg) — The first offer by China and India to limit greenhouse gases in a global agreement may help U.S. President Barack Obama win over members of the Senate who don’t want to impose similar restrictions on American companies. The accord brokered by the three countries last week at United Nations talks in Copenhagen , while not legally binding, also calls for international verification. That addresses demands by senators who oppose UN rules that may hurt U.S. businesses’ ability to compete in the global marketplace. “The agreement helps us politically deal with the concerns that we would be putting American manufacturers at a disadvantage,” Senator Benjamin Cardin , a Maryland Democrat, said in an interview on Dec. 19, the day most of the world’s nations endorsed a framework termed the Copenhagen Accord. The plan calls for another year of talks for a treaty to tackle global warming by capping emissions and expanding the $120 billion carbon market. A U.S. law allowing carbon trading would move the market’s “center of gravity” from London to New York and Chicago, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP said today . Some senators may never reverse their opposition to U.S. climate-protection legislation because China won’t follow through with its new duties, Senator James Inhofe of Oklahoma said last week. China and India are the largest and fourth- largest producers of gases from burning fossil fuels. Inhofe, a Republican, has called the idea of man-made global warming a “hoax.” He spent a few hours in Copenhagen to ensure nations wouldn’t be “deceived into thinking the U.S. would pass cap-and-trade legislation,” the incentive system that requires emission permits and lets companies trade them. ‘First Step’ The Copenhagen Accord, called a “first step,” by Obama, may sway a few legislators to his side because it doesn’t legally bind the U.S. to limits imposed by other countries. “The agreement probably isn’t sufficient to win over conservative Republican votes, but may be sufficient to provide political cover for moderate Democratic votes from the coal and rural states,” said Robert Stavins , director of the Harvard Environmental Economics Program in Cambridge, Massachusetts. The U.S. president arrived at UN-led climate talks last week hindered by his own legislative priorities. Congressional debate over U.S. health care has put a climate-protection bill on the backburner until next year. Lack of legislation from the Senate, the only U.S. body authorized to approve treaties, left U.S. negotiators without clear guidelines on what lawmakers would accept in an accord. The strongest message to date from the Senate on global climate policy remains a 1998 resolution rejecting the existing Kyoto Protocol because it requires industrialized nations to cut emissions, not developing countries such as China and India. Emissions Pledges The Copenhagen Accord gives nations until Feb. 1 to offer emissions pledges. It’s unclear whether reductions will reach levels scientists say are needed to limit heat-trapping gases they blame for global warming. Bolivia, Sudan and Venezuela were among countries that spoke out against the accord that analysts say will still provide impetus to U.S. legislators. “The Senate needed assurances that the U.S. is not stepping out alone,” Eric Haxthausen , climate policy director for Nature Conservancy, the Arlington, Virginia-based advisory group headed by Mark Tercek , former environmental markets chief at Goldman Sachs Group Inc. The UN climate summit that ended Dec. 19, “as messy as it was, was sufficient to deliver on that objective.” The agreement fell short of unanimous support from UN members. It lacked the teeth of a treaty that was wanted by many of the 193 nations at the conference. The environmental group Friends of the Earth called it a failure. Unprecedented Kumi Naidoo, executive director of Greenpeace International, said the accord lacks strong emissions targets and provides concessions to fossil fuel industries. “Averting climate chaos has just gotten a whole lot harder,” Naidoo said in a statement. U.S. Senator Barbara Boxer , the California Democrat who heads a committee that drafted a climate change bill, said the deal was unprecedented. “For the first time, the world’s major emitting countries, including China and India, have committed to specific actions to cut greenhouse gas pollution,” Boxer said in Dec. 18 statement. “While there is more work to do, the progress made today will add to the momentum here at home for legislation,” to curb emissions. Trail of Legislation The U.S. House in June passed legislation that calls for a 17 percent reduction in emissions by 2020. The Senate may take up a similar measure in next year. Most Republicans oppose climate change legislation they claim will raise energy prices just as the U.S. is emerging from a recession. About half of U.S. electricity comes from burning coal, the most polluting fossil fuel and the most at risk, and the reliance in Indiana is 94 percent, according to the American Coalition for Clean Coal Electricity, an industry group that supports coal. In Ohio, coal provides 86 percent of power. Prior to the two-week conference in the Danish capital, nine U.S. senators sent a letter to Obama warning that bad climate policy could hurt U.S. companies and workers without improving the environment. Any accord should require “all major economies to adopt ambitious, measurable and verifiable actions,” according the Dec. 3 letter signed by senators from states such as Ohio, Michigan and Pennsylvania. The Copenhagen agreement, which calls for international measurement, reporting and verification of emissions cutting by poorer nations, was reached after Obama had last-minute talks with Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao , Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh , Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva and South African President, Jacob Zuma . The accord carries more weight because it was reached in face-to-face meetings between the leaders, Haxthausen said. “Rather than having an agreement that was hammered out by negotiators, this was an extraordinary situation where the leaders came together and agreed to something,” he said. “You have the pledges of these leaders personally to each other.” To contact the reporters on this story: Jim Efstathiou Jr . in Copenhagen at jefstathiou@bloomberg.net Kim Chipman in Copenhagen at kchipman@bloomberg.net

Read the full article →

Virgin Airways Branson Helps Lead Climate Charge After UN Envoys’ Failure

December 20, 2009

By Jeremy van Loon and Kim Chipman Dec. 21 (Bloomberg) — Billionaire Richard Branson wanted government legislation to reduce the carbon dioxide emitted into the air by his Virgin Atlantic Airways Ltd. aircraft. He didn’t get it so he suggests the industry go it alone. United Nations envoys from the U.S., China and another 191 countries failed to reach a binding accord to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in two-weeks of talks that ended Dec. 19 in Copenhagen. Even the arrival of U.S. President Barack Obama on Friday didn’t end the impasse. Branson and executives from General Electric Co., Duke Energy Corp. and Siemens AG say they want clarity next year from governments on emission regulations. Meantime, they plan to invest more to reduce output of carbon gases blamed for global warming. “The airline industry is one of the polluters,” Branson said in an interview in Copenhagen on Dec. 18. “We owe it to the public to get our house in order. If the governments won’t set targets then I would suggest that the airlines get together and do it themselves and set an example.” Copenhagen was supposed to be the culmination of two years of talks to set up an agreement to replace the Kyoto Protocol, which was signed in 1997 and set CO2 limits on industrialized economies that expire in 2012. Talks in the Danish capital got bogged down in disputes over aid to developing countries facing damage from climate change, pollution-reduction goals and how to verify individual countries’ pledges to cut harmful emissions. Less Polluting Even without a binding climate deal, companies plan to press ahead to make their businesses less polluting. Branson plans to use more biofuel made from inedible plants in Virgin’s fleet of 115 aircraft. He also wants Boeing Co. and Airbus SAS to build lighter, more efficient aircraft. GE Chief Executive Officer Jeffrey Immelt has pushed for a price for carbon and U.S. clean energy standards in order to increase sales of less-polluting equipment for nuclear power and coal-fired boilers. The company, whose equipment generates one- third of the world’s electricity, is considering expanding further into clean-energy industries. Lester Brown , president of the Washington-based Earth Policy Institute, says the private sector will move the world to a low-emissions energy economy and that global accords such as the one being sought in Copenhagen aren’t up to the task. “They are obsolete. They take too long to negotiate and ratify,” he said in an interview. “In this case, the game may be over by then.” Letter to Obama Microsoft Corp., Duke Energy Corp., Nike Inc. and Dow Chemical Co. last week sent a letter to President Barack Obama urging him to push for a treaty with “substantial” financing goals. “Such an agreement will provide the market certainty that will unleash the investments needed to create jobs and enhance U.S. competitiveness,” according to the Dec. 15 letter. The agreement in Copenhagen, which leaves it up to individual countries to reduce carbon emissions, will still help boost demand for Dow Chemical Co.’s solar power, battery and insulation products, said Russel Mills, global director energy and climate-change policy at Dow Europe. “It’s helpful,” Mills said in an interview Dec. 18 in Copenhagen after the accord was reached. “The key issue is we have started on a global process.” Hamlet The uncertainty of the UN meeting’s outcome was underscored by a Dec. 12 event at Kronborg Castle in Helsingor, just outside Copenhagen. The town is also known as Elsinore, the setting for William Shakespeare ’s “Hamlet.” The topic: ‘To be, or not to be? New Leadership for a Sustainable Economy.’ “There can be no effective response to the climate problem without business innovation, investment and low-carbon technology and processes,” former U.S. President Bill Clinton told the crowd via videoconference. Companies in Europe expect tougher emission targets and are preparing to buy emissions permits on the European carbon market, said Abyd Karmali, global head of carbon markets at Bank of America Merrill Lynch. Pending U.S. legislation is more important than a global treaty, he said. “People are going to focus on their regional domestic markets and the rules on emissions that evolve there,” he said in an interview on Dec. 18. Siemens AG , the manufacturer planning to supply turbines to the Sahara desert’s biggest solar project, expects its solar- equipment earnings to surge in the next few years. The German engineering company agreed on Oct. 15 to buy solar-thermal power company Solel Solar Systems Ltd. for about $418 million to expand its renewable-energy products. Enzyme Business Danisco A/S, the Nordic region’s largest maker of food ingredients, will press ahead with an expansion of its enzyme business, which helps convert plant material into biofuel that can be used in vehicles, said Chief Executive Tom Knudsen . “I am very encouraged about the momentum in North America,” he said in an interview on Dec. 10. “This is going to be big,” he added, referring to the size of the market for biofuels. Mindy Lubber , director of the Investor Network on Climate Risk , a network of 80 institutional investors with collective assets totaling $8 trillion, said businesses were encouraged that so many nations came together at Copenhagen and agreed there is a problem. Still, “most of the hard work still lies ahead,” she said. To contact the reporter on this story: Jeremy van Loon in Copenhagen via jvanloon@bloomberg.net ; Kim Chipman in Copenhagen at KChipman@bloomberg.net .

Read the full article →

Obama’s `Unprecedented’ Climate Accord Delays Solution for at Least a Year

December 19, 2009

By Jim Efstathiou Jr. and Jeremy van Loon Dec. 19 (Bloomberg) — U.S. President Barack Obama called a climate change agreement with China and about 25 other nations an “unprecedented” move to slow global warming. Environmental groups and at least five developing nations called it a failure. The accord, which pushes off signing a treaty for at least a year, is “a first step,” Obama said yesterday before leaving Copenhagen, where he spent 14 hours cobbling together the agreement in meetings with world leaders, and addressing 8,000 envoys from 193 nations. Delegates from those countries failed to reach consensus on the accord today after discussing it through the night, agreeing instead to “take note” of the document, or recognize that it exists. The agreement seeks cuts in greenhouse-gas emissions that scientists blame for global warming without binding countries to take action. “The meeting was a disaster,” Lars-Erik Liljelund, the director general of Swedish Prime Minister Fredrik Reinfeldt’s office, said in an interview today. “The process needs to be changed because if we continue like this, we won’t be any further a year from now.” Negotiators met in the Danish capital for two weeks of United Nations talks on curbing global warming. Debate stumbled on aid to developing countries facing damage from climate change, pollution-reduction goals and how to verify individual country’s pledges to cut harmful emissions. Environmentalists said the agreement that includes the U.S. and China — the world’s two biggest emitters of greenhouse gases — falls well short of what’s needed to deal with global warming. Bolivia, Sudan and Venezuela were among countries that spoke out against the accord, which will serve as a framework for continuing talks in 2010. ‘Backroom Deal’ “This is the United Nations and the nations here are not united on this secret backroom declaration,” Kate Horner, policy analyst for the London-based environmental group Friends of the Earth, said in statement. “Copenhagen has been an abject failure.” The proposal calls for voluntary steps to reduce emissions blamed for heating the atmosphere, melting icecaps and causing destructive weather patterns. For two years, nations from China to members of the 27-country European Union repeatedly called for a binding treaty to be signed in Copenhagen. “It will not be legally binding, but what it will do is allow for each country to show to the world what they are doing,” Obama told reporters in Copenhagen. “There will be a sense on the part of each country that we’re in this together and we’ll know who is meeting and who’s not meeting the mutual obligations that have been set forth.” Pledges? Rich countries offered to provide $100 billion a year by 2020 to help poor nations reduce carbon emissions, which is conditional on developing countries cutting gas discharges, according to the text. They may also pay out $30 billion in aid from next year through 2012. “In terms of finance, it is vague, it is a big soup,” Pa Ousman Jarju , a Gambian delegate, said in an interview in Copenhagen. “It’s well below what is required.” The agreement was reached after President Barack Obama had last-minute talks with Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao , Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh , Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva and South African President, Jacob Zuma in Copenhagen today. It was then taken to all nations and most backed it. “There emerged over time a real sense in the room that most countries wanted to move forward with some kind of decision,” said Ruben Kraiem , co-chair of the climate practice for attorneys Covington & Burling LLP in New York. ‘Well Short’ Nations should try to keep the global temperature increase before industrialization “below 2 degrees” Celsius (3.6 degrees Fahrenheit), according to the agreement. Envoys from the U.S., Europe and China have supported the 2 degrees target. Poorer nations and environmental groups wanted 1 or 1.5 degrees, fearing a higher increase will raise sea levels and make coastal cities and some island states uninhabitable. “As President Obama said, its well short of what’s ultimately needed,” Elliot Diringer , vice president for international strategies at Arlington, Virginia-based Pew Center on Global Climate Change, said in a statement. “But it would provide a reasonable basis for negotiating a fair and effective climate treaty.” Without emissions curbs, temperatures would rise by 6 degrees Celsius, an increase that “would lead almost certainly to massive climatic change,” the International Energy Agency, an advisor to 28 oil-consuming nations, said in a report. A more-than-2-degree warming will bring more intense flooding and drought and a faster sea-level increase, according to the UN. Hard to Define “This declaration or outcome or whatever you want to call it, is not a legally binding document,” Indian Environment Minister Ramesh said in an interview. “It’s a political statement.” For 20 years, scientists working for the United Nations have provided guidance for global climate talks. The result is the Kyoto Protocol, a 1997 accord that limits greenhouse-gas emissions among 37 industrialized nations. Those targets are set to expire in 2012, leaving the world without binding goals if Copenhagen doesn’t renew them. “The objective of these negotiations of securing the future of the planet definitely wasn’t achieved,” Melinda Kimble , the U.S. chief negotiator for the Kyoto Protocol and senior vice president at the United Nations Foundation said in an interview in Copenhagen. “It’s a limited outcome.” To contact the reporters on this story: Nicholas Johnston in Copenhagen at njohnston6@bloomberg.net and Jim Efstathiou Jr . in Copenhagen at jefstathiou@bloomberg.net .

Read the full article →

Obama-Backed Climate Accord Is Labeled a Failure by Environmental Groups

December 18, 2009

By Jim Efstathiou Jr. and Nicholas Johnston Dec. 19 (Bloomberg) — U.S. President Barack Obama called a climate change agreement with China and about 20 other nations an “unprecedented” move to slow global warming. Environmental groups called it a failure. The agreement is “a first step,” Obama said yesterday before departing Copenhagen, where he spent 14 hours in meetings and addressing 8,000 delegates from 193 nations. The accord still needs to be approved by all nations attending. Negotiators met in the Danish capital for two-weeks of United Nations talks on curbing global warming. Debate stumbled on aid to developing countries facing damage from climate change, pollution-reduction goals and how to verify individual country’s pledges to cut harmful emissions. Environmentalists said the agreement that includes the U.S. and China — the world’s two biggest emitters of greenhouse gases — falls well short of what’s needed to deal with global warming. “This is the United Nations and the nations here are not united on this secret backroom declaration,” Kate Horner, international director of the London-based environmental group Friends of the Earth said in statement. “Copenhagen has been an abject failure.” The proposal calls for voluntary steps to reduce greenhouse gases blamed for global warming and does not legally mandate the cuts. “It will not be legally binding, but what it will do is allow for each country to show to the world what they are doing,” Obama told reporters in Copenhagen. “There will be a sense on the part of each country that we’re in this together and we’ll know who is meeting and who’s not meeting the mutual obligations that have been set forth.” Pledges Rich countries will provide $100 billion a year by 2020 to help poor nations reduce their carbon emissions, according to the text. They will also pay out $30 billion from next year through 2012. “In terms of finance, it is vague, it is a big soup,” Pa Ousman Jarju , a Gambian delegate, said in an interview in Copenhagen. “It’s well below what is required.” The agreement was reached after President Barack Obama had last-minute talks with Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao , Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh , Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva and South African President, Jacob Zuma in Copenhagen today. “It’s going to be difficult to get developing countries to agree to this,” Brazilian envoy Sergio Serra said. The U.S. will cut CO2 emissions between 14 percent and 17 percent by 2020 from 2005 levels, while Japan will cut emissions 25 percent and Russia may reduce output as much as 25 percent, the agreement said. Nations should try to keep the global temperature increase before industrialization “below 2 degrees,” Celsius (3.6 degrees Fahrenheit), according to the agreement. Envoys from the U.S., Europe and China have backed the 2 degrees target. ‘Well Short’ “As President Obama said, its well short of what’s ultimately needed,” Elliot Diringer , vice president for international strategies at Arlington, Virginia-based Pew Center on Global Climate Change, said in a statement. “But it would provide a reasonable basis for negotiating a fair and effective climate treaty.” Without emissions curbs, temperatures would rise by 6 degrees Celsius, an increase that “would lead almost certainly to massive climatic change,” the International Energy Agency, an advisor to 28 oil-consuming nations, said in a report. A more-than-2-degree warming will bring more intense flooding and drought and a faster sea-level increase, according to the UN. “This declaration or outcome or whatever you want to call it, is not a legally binding document,” Indian Environment Minister Ramesh said in an interview. “It’s a political statement.” For 20 years, scientists working for the United Nations have provided guidance for global climate talks. The result is the Kyoto Protocol, a 1997 accord that limits greenhouse-gas emissions among 37 industrialized nations. Those targets are set to expire in 2012, leaving the world without binding goals if Copenhagen doesn’t renew them. “The objective of these negotiations of securing the future of the planet definitely wasn’t achieved,” Melinda Kimble , the U.S. chief negotiator for the Kyoto Protocol and senior vice president at the United Nations Foundation said in an interview in Copenhagen. “It’s a limited outcome.” To contact the reporters on this story: Nicholas Johnston in Copenhagen at njohnston6@bloomberg.net and Jim Efstathiou Jr . in Copenhagen at jefstathiou@bloomberg.net .

Read the full article →

Climate Envoys Consider Delaying Binding Accord Beyond 2010

December 18, 2009

By Alex Morales and Jeremy van Loon Dec. 18 (Bloomberg) — United Nations climate envoys may drop their plan to complete a binding global-warming agreement by the end of 2010, as two weeks of talks in Copenhagen overran their deadline with no framework to forge a treaty. A draft agreement to be signed in the Danish capital omitted a requirement that nations adopt “one or more legal instruments” to fight global warming during a UN meeting planned in Mexico City in November. The 2010 limit was in an earlier draft today. “The big obstacle is the gap between developed and developing countries: We’re playing ping-pong,” Haimoude Ould Ahmed, a senator from Mauritania, said in an interview in Copenhagen. “We’ll have to prolong the talks into the night and tomorrow morning. We’re worried. We had many hopes.” With a gulf remaining between China and the U.S., the biggest greenhouse-gas emitters, U.S. President Barack Obama scheduled a second meeting with Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao for 7 p.m., an hour after the planned close of the 193-nation summit. The draft, obtained by Bloomberg News, retains several elements from its earlier version. One calls for containing the average global temperature to within 2 degrees Celsius (3.6 degrees Fahrenheit) compared with pre-industrial times. Another provision of the “Copenhagen Accord,” which lacks final approval, calls for the richest nations to provide climate aid to developing nations of $30 billion over the next three years and $100 billion annually by the end of 2020, a plan that has won endorsement by the U.S. 80 Percent Emissions Cut The proposal also seeks an 80 percent emissions-cut by rich countries by 2050 and stopped short of listing any goals for 2020. Delegates said the summit, scheduled to end at 6 p.m. today, won’t end until at least tomorrow. There was opposition by some of the 119 world leaders attending the conference to the draft text, because it isn’t one of two official United Nations negotiating texts that are the product of two years of talks. “The documents that were being worked on for two years were left there frozen, like the snow falling here in Copenhagen,” Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez told reporters earlier today. “Now they’re trying to bring a document out of nothing. We can’t support or accept that which we don’t know.” Earlier today, U.S. President Barack Obama met privately with Chinese Prime Minister Wen Jiabao for almost an hour. Wen later failed to attend a meeting between Obama and other world leaders, adding to speculation the world’s two biggest emitters are far apart on an agreement to fight climate change. Bolivian President Evo Morales also said his country “can’t accept” the document. Chavez and Morales made their comments before the latest draft was published. Temperature Target The new draft changes wording about a temperature target, saying nations should strive to keep warming to “below 2 degrees.” Earlier the text said the rise in global temperatures “ought not to exceed 2 degrees.” Neither draft specified the units, though envoys from the U.S., Europe and China have backed a target of 2 degrees Celsius (3.6 degrees Fahrenheit.) Accepting 2 degrees “is to finish with all the islands in the world,” Bolivia’s Morals said. Delegates put an “X” for the 2020 target, compared with 1990 levels in both the new and earlier drafts. “This cannot be the outcome of Copenhagen: they’re going to have to do a lot more work,” Cindy Baxter , a spokeswoman for the environmental campaign group Greenpeace said earlier today in an interview in the Danish capital. Envoys from 193 nations are trying to craft a declaration to conclude the talks, which are being attended by about 120 world leaders, including U.S. President Barack Obama , who repeated U.S. emissions pledges and financial aid today. The draft text included provisions for a total of $30 billion in climate aid from rich to poor nations over three years, rising to $100 billion annually by 2020, a figure Obama said the U.S. supports. European delegates and UN Framework Convention on climate Change Executive Secretary Yvo de Boer last month said the Copenhagen summit, the culmination of two years of negotiations, wouldn’t produce a legally binding treaty to curb greenhouse gases, and that it should set a firm timeline to achieve one. To contact the reporter on this story: Alex Morales in Copenhagen via amorales2@bloomberg.net ; Jeremy van Loon in Copenhagen via jvanloon@bloomberg.net

Read the full article →

Scientific Goals May Be Missed in Copenhagen Accord

December 17, 2009

By Jim Efstathiou Jr. Dec. 17 (Bloomberg) — World leaders taking control of stalled climate talks today in Copenhagen may find the measures acceptable to 193 nations fall short of what scientists demand to slow global warming. Developed nations such as the U.S. and Japan may agree by tomorrow to cut greenhouse-gas emissions by about half what United Nations scientists said are needed to keep the planet from overheating. That’s a view shared by representatives of the Pew Center on Global Climate Change, Merrill Lynch & Co. and the European Commission, which represents 27 European nations. “We’ll only have the minimum level of commitments coming out of Copenhagen,” Abyd Karmali , London-based global head of carbon emissions for BofA Merrill Lynch, said in an interview. “There’s a scaling back of expectations” on bigger measures. World leaders from China, the U.S., the European Union and India, the top polluters, are taking charge of the talks from envoys who have bickered over key provisions since Dec. 7. The talks are scheduled to finish tomorrow. By 2020, developed nations must cut emissions 25 percent to 40 percent from 1990 to “stand a chance” of keeping the global temperature within 2 degrees Celsius (3.6 degrees Fahrenheit) of pre-industrial times, the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change said. While a 2-degree pledge is possible, nations don’t seem to be putting the targets in place. “Everybody has to show a higher level of ambition,” U.K. Prime Minister Gordon Brown told reporters yesterday. “We’re looking to every part of the world to look again at numbers and see how ambitious they can be.” 6-Degree Limit Without emissions curbs, temperatures would rise by 6 degrees Celsius, an increase that “would lead almost certainly to massive climatic change,” the International Energy Agency, an advisor to 28 oil-consuming nations, said in a report . A more-than-2-degree warming will bring more intense flooding and drought and a faster sea-level increase, according to the UN. For 20 years, scientists working for the United Nations have provided guidance for global climate talks. The only achievement with teeth is the Kyoto Protocol, a 1997 accord that limits greenhouse-gas emissions among 37 industrialized nations. Those targets are set to expire in 2012, leaving the world without binding goals if Copenhagen doesn’t renew them. “Whatever we are going to achieve here, I would think that there’s something better,” European Union Environment Commissioner Stavros Dimas said in an interview. “Already, science is telling us that climate change is accelerating and the impacts are more ominous than previously thought.” China, India Stance Developing nations such as China and India have called on the U.S. to reduce emissions 40 percent in the period. The European Union has offered 20 percent. U.S. President Barack Obama is expected to pledge a cut of around 17 percent from 2005, or about 4 percent from the base year others use. “There’s a realization that with the United States not being able to move past the 17 percent based on 2005, everyone is going to have to scale back in the short term,” Karmali said. The final accord may include the aggregate cut already pledged by rich nations, said Elliot Diringer , who oversees international strategies at the Pew Center on Global Climate Change, in Arlington, Virginia. That amounts to about 18 percent over the three decades. That pledge will require steeper, costlier reductions later in order to meet the 2-degree Celsius target, he said. “It is very likely going to fall short of what the science suggests is needed but this is just another step on the path” to stronger measures, Diringer said. 18 Percent Solution Dimas said he expects an agreement on a 2-degree target, a commitment from rich nations to cut emissions by about 18 percent by 2020, commitments by developing nations to reduce the growth of their emissions and a pledge to revisit the targets in two to four years. The latest negotiating draft released today reflects the level of discord. Temperature limits of 1 degree, 1.5 degrees and 2 degrees all remain options. “Unfortunately there’s nothing to report,” Jairam Ramesh , India’s environment minister, said today in an interview. “It’s been a day of complete stalemate.” Connie Hedegaard , chairwoman of the meeting, stepped down today, allowing Danish Prime Minister Lars Loekke Rasmussen to take over. The Danes said they would offer a new proposal for a Copenhagen agreement. Any accord is likely to come in the form of a consensus by the negotiating parties, something in between a legally binding treaty and a political agreement, said Ruben Kraiem , co-chair of the climate practice for attorneys Covington & Burling LLP in New York. “It’ll be a consensus political agreement,” Kraiem said in an interview in Copenhagen. “It’s not just a handshake and it’s also not a treaty. It’s a decision by a corporate body.” To contact the reporter on this story: Jim Efstathiou Jr . in Copenhagen at jefstathiou@bloomberg.net .

Read the full article →

Climate-Change Deal Hinges on Verifying Carbon Reductions, Clinton Says

December 17, 2009

By Jeremy van Loon and Jim Efstathiou Jr. Dec. 17 (Bloomberg) — The top U.S. diplomat arrived at climate change talks in Copenhagen and said the world’s biggest economy would be part of an agreement only if emissions reductions in poorer nations can be verified. U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said the U.S. is prepared to contribute to an aid package valued at $100 billion by 2020 for developing countries to curb greenhouse gases and cope with climate change. The offer is conditional on commitments from China and other nations to “transparency” in monitoring pledges to cut carbon-dioxide emissions, she said. The U.S., China and the European Union, the world’s biggest polluters, are racing against the clock to complete a climate change deal with one day left of UN talks in the Danish capital. Negotiators have yet to agree on measures to confirm how nations will limit gas discharges they promise. “The U.S. is ready to do our part,” Clinton told reporters today at the Bella Center in Copenhagen where the talks are taking place. Failure to meet U.S. conditions on monitoring reductions is a “deal breaker,” she said. Formal negotiations resumed today after a decision to proceed with two UN drafts, one that extends the existing Kyoto Protocol climate accord and a new agreement that calls for emissions curbs from developing nations. An accord that sets out details on financing and technology for poor nations as well as an agreement to limit temperature rise to 2 degrees Celsius (3.6 degrees Fahrenheit) is still possible, U.K. Prime Minister Gordon Brown said today. ‘No Insurmountable Wall’ “My talks this week convinced me that while the challenges are difficult there is no insurmountable wall of division to reaching agreement now,” Brown told a hall full of world leaders. United Nations envoys from 193 countries meeting for two weeks in Copenhagen have so far failed to complete a climate- change treaty because of divisions over how much to pay poor nations and whether China and India should have their promises to cut carbon measured and verified by international auditors. Almost 120 prime ministers, presidents and vice presidents from nations accounting for 89 percent of the world’s gross domestic product begin meetings today to unblock the impasse. The UN official who supervises the talks expressed optimism today. “Hold tight and mind the doors, the cable car is moving again,” Yvo De Boer , executive secretary of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change, told reporters today. “We now have clarity on the process, we have clarity on the documents that will be the basis of the work.” Tracking Tools The Obama administration wants any climate accord to have tools to verify that nations are abiding by promises to cut emissions. China and India don’t want their national commitments to become legally binding in an international treaty. “Secretary Clinton’s announcement can be a game changer for the Copenhagen climate summit,” Alden Meyer of the U.S.-based Union of Concerned Scientists said today in an interview. “The key issue, of course, is what portion of this $100 billion per year will be public finance.” China’s lead negotiator at the talks, Su Wei , said an agreement can be reached in Copenhagen that China “hopes” could be translated into a final deal “by the middle of next year, if possible, or if not, then by the end of the year.” While the world’s biggest polluters remain optimistic about reaching a deal, delegates from Africa and other developing nations are less willing to accept a compromise. “No deal is better than to have a bad deal, particularly for Africa,” said Algerian envoy Kamel Djemouai , who speaks for 53 African nations. “To get to a bad deal with our heads of state here is quite difficult for anybody to accept here.” A deal this week in Copenhagen may include a timeline to help negotiators tackle obstacles that are holding back progress. A series of meetings are planned through 2010, with a final session set for Mexico City a year from now. To contact the reporter on this story: Jeremy van Loon in Copenhagen via jvanloon@bloomberg.net

Read the full article →

Climate-Change Deal Hinges on Verifying Carbon Reductions, Clinton Says

December 17, 2009

By Jeremy van Loon and Jim Efstathiou Jr. Dec. 17 (Bloomberg) — The top U.S. diplomat arrived at climate change talks in Copenhagen and said the world’s biggest economy would be part of an agreement only if emissions reductions in poorer nations can be verified. U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said the U.S. is prepared to contribute to an aid package valued at $100 billion by 2020 for developing countries to curb greenhouse gases and cope with climate change. The offer is conditional on commitments from China and other nations to “transparency” in monitoring pledges to cut carbon-dioxide emissions, she said. The U.S., China and the European Union, the world’s biggest polluters, are racing against the clock to complete a climate change deal with one day left of UN talks in the Danish capital. Negotiators have yet to agree on measures to confirm how nations will limit gas discharges they promise. “The U.S. is ready to do our part,” Clinton told reporters today at the Bella Center in Copenhagen where the talks are taking place. Failure to meet U.S. conditions on monitoring reductions is a “deal breaker,” she said. Formal negotiations resumed today after a decision to proceed with two UN drafts, one that extends the existing Kyoto Protocol climate accord and a new agreement that calls for emissions curbs from developing nations. An accord that sets out details on financing and technology for poor nations as well as an agreement to limit temperature rise to 2 degrees Celsius (3.6 degrees Fahrenheit) is still possible, U.K. Prime Minister Gordon Brown said today. ‘No Insurmountable Wall’ “My talks this week convinced me that while the challenges are difficult there is no insurmountable wall of division to reaching agreement now,” Brown told a hall full of world leaders. United Nations envoys from 193 countries meeting for two weeks in Copenhagen have so far failed to complete a climate- change treaty because of divisions over how much to pay poor nations and whether China and India should have their promises to cut carbon measured and verified by international auditors. Almost 120 prime ministers, presidents and vice presidents from nations accounting for 89 percent of the world’s gross domestic product begin meetings today to unblock the impasse. The UN official who supervises the talks expressed optimism today. “Hold tight and mind the doors, the cable car is moving again,” Yvo De Boer , executive secretary of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change, told reporters today. “We now have clarity on the process, we have clarity on the documents that will be the basis of the work.” Tracking Tools The Obama administration wants any climate accord to have tools to verify that nations are abiding by promises to cut emissions. China and India don’t want their national commitments to become legally binding in an international treaty. “Secretary Clinton’s announcement can be a game changer for the Copenhagen climate summit,” Alden Meyer of the U.S.-based Union of Concerned Scientists said today in an interview. “The key issue, of course, is what portion of this $100 billion per year will be public finance.” China’s lead negotiator at the talks, Su Wei , said an agreement can be reached in Copenhagen that China “hopes” could be translated into a final deal “by the middle of next year, if possible, or if not, then by the end of the year.” While the world’s biggest polluters remain optimistic about reaching a deal, delegates from Africa and other developing nations are less willing to accept a compromise. “No deal is better than to have a bad deal, particularly for Africa,” said Algerian envoy Kamel Djemouai , who speaks for 53 African nations. “To get to a bad deal with our heads of state here is quite difficult for anybody to accept here.” A deal this week in Copenhagen may include a timeline to help negotiators tackle obstacles that are holding back progress. A series of meetings are planned through 2010, with a final session set for Mexico City a year from now. To contact the reporter on this story: Jeremy van Loon in Copenhagen via jvanloon@bloomberg.net

Read the full article →

Scientific Goals May Be Missed by Copenhagen Climate Agreement

December 17, 2009

By Jim Efstathiou Jr. Dec. 17 (Bloomberg) — World leaders taking control of stalled climate talks today in Copenhagen may find the measures acceptable to 193 nations fall short of what scientists demand to slow global warming. Developed nations such as the U.S. and Japan may agree by tomorrow to cut greenhouse-gas emissions by about half what United Nations scientists said are needed to keep the planet from overheating. That’s a view shared by representatives of the Pew Center on Global Climate Change, Merrill Lynch & Co. and the European Commission, which represents 27 European nations. “We’ll only have the minimum level of commitments coming out of Copenhagen,” Abyd Karmali , London-based global head of carbon emissions for BofA Merrill Lynch, said in an interview. “There’s a scaling back of expectations” on bigger measures. World leaders from China, the U.S., the European Union and India, the top polluters, are taking charge of the talks from envoys who have bickered over key provisions since Dec. 7. The talks are scheduled to finish tomorrow. By 2020, developed nations must cut emissions 25 percent to 40 percent from 1990 to “stand a chance” of keeping the global temperature within 2 degrees Celsius (3.6 degrees Fahrenheit) of pre-industrial times, the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change said. While a 2-degree pledge is possible, nations don’t seem to be putting the targets in place. “Everybody has to show a higher level of ambition,” U.K. Prime Minister Gordon Brown told reporters yesterday. “We’re looking to every part of the world to look again at numbers and see how ambitious they can be.” ‘More Ominous’ For 20 years, scientists working for the United Nations have provided guidance for global climate talks. The only achievement with teeth is the Kyoto Protocol, a 1997 accord that limits greenhouse-gas emissions among 37 industrialized nations. Those targets are set to expire in 2012, leaving the world without binding goals if Copenhagen doesn’t renew them. “Whatever we are going to achieve here, I would think that there’s something better,” European Union Environment Commissioner Stavros Dimas said in an interview. “Already, science is telling us that climate change is accelerating and the impacts are more ominous than previously thought.” Developing nations such as China and India have called on the U.S. to reduce emissions 40 percent by in the period. The European Union has offered 20 percent. U.S. President Barack Obama is expected to pledge a cut of around 17 percent from 2005, or about 4 percent from the base year others use. “There’s a realization that with the United States not being able to move past the 17 percent based on 2005, everyone is going to have to scale back in the short term,” Karmali said. Steeper Cuts Later? The final accord may include the aggregate cut already pledged by rich nations, said Elliot Diringer , who oversees international strategies at the Pew Center on Global Climate Change, in Arlington, Virginia. That amounts to about 18 percent over the three decades. That pledge will require steeper, costlier reductions later in order to meet the 2-degree Celsius target, he said. “It is very likely going to fall short of what the science suggests is needed but this is just another step on the path” to stronger measures, Diringer said. Dimas said he expects an agreement on a 2-degree target, a commitment from rich nations to cut emissions by about 18 percent by 2020, commitments by developing nations to reduce the growth of their emissions and a pledge to revisit the targets in two to four years. The latest negotiating draft released today reflects the level of discord. Temperature limits of 1 degree, 1.5 degrees and 2 degrees all remain options. Stalemate, Resignation “Unfortunately there’s nothing to report,” Jairam Ramesh , India’s environment minister, said today in an interview. “It’s been a day of complete stalemate.” Connie Hedegaard , chairwoman of the meeting, stepped down today, allowing Danish Prime Minister Lars Loekke Rasmussen to take over. The Danes said they would offer a new proposal for a Copenhagen agreement. Any accord is likely to come in the form of a consensus by the negotiating parties, something in between a legally binding treaty and a political agreement, said Ruben Kraiem , co-chair of the climate practice for attorneys Covington & Burling LLP in New York. “It’ll be a consensus political agreement,” Kraiem said in an interview in Copenhagen. “It’s not just a handshake and it’s also not a treaty. It’s a decision by a corporate body.” To contact the reporter on this story: Jim Efstathiou Jr . in Copenhagen at jefstathiou@bloomberg.net .

Read the full article →

Climate-Change Talks May Set Deadlines; China Says Accord Still Possible

December 17, 2009

By Jeremy van Loon and Alex Morales Dec. 17 (Bloomberg) — United Nations envoys in Copenhagen who have failed to complete a climate-change treaty say they may set deadlines to complete a binding agreement in 2010. China today said an accord can be reached that may translate into a final deal by the middle of next year. “We’re still pushing to get a timeline,” said Artur Runge-Metzger , chief climate negotiator for the European Commission, in an interview today. China and the U.S. are also committed to get a deal by the end of next year, delegates said. One day before the two-week talks are scheduled to end, envoys from 193 countries are trying to agree on a to-do list for next year after giving up on setting legal limits for individual countries to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions. “The clock is ticking and we do not have the luxury of time,” said Su Wei , China’s lead negotiator. “We would strive for an earlier time schedule because this is really urgent.” China’s Su said an agreement can be reached in Copenhagen that China “hopes” could be translated into a final deal “by the middle of next year, if possible, or if not, then by the end of the year.” In the Danish capital, where snow fell yesterday as world leaders began to arrive to wrap up the global-warming talks, progress on the accord was slowed as the 119 leaders prepared to take charge of the negotiations. With disagreements remaining over financing for poor countries, measurement and verification of carbon emissions as well as CO2 targets for rich nations, the Danish Prime Minister Lars Loekke Rasmussen, who is also president of UN climate talks, is putting together a new draft to unblock the talks. Mexico City A timeline would help negotiators tackle obstacles that are holding back progress. A series of meetings are planned through 2010, with a final session set for Mexico City a year from now. Meanwhile, China and the U.S. are still at loggerheads over verifying emissions reductions. The Obama administration wants any climate accord that emerges from talks in Copenhagen to have tools to verify that nations are abiding by promises to cut greenhouse-gas emissions. China and India don’t want their national commitments to become legally binding in an international treaty. To contact the reporter on this story: Jeremy van Loon in Copenhagen via jvanloon@bloomberg.net ; Alex Morales in Copenhagen via amorales2@bloomberg.net .

Read the full article →

`Oprah Effect’ Aids Copenhagen Counterattack as Tourists Head to Stockholm

December 16, 2009

By Janina Pfalzer Dec. 16 (Bloomberg) — Oprah is Copenhagen’s newest weapon in the battle to claw back tourists and conventions that have been lured away by Stockholm. After Oprah Winfrey , host of the highest-rated U.S. talk show, visited the city for the International Olympic Committee Congress in October, the local tourism agency put her itinerary on its Web site, making it easier for visitors to book a stay at the five-star Hotel D’Angleterre , where she slept, or sample the cakes she bought from chocolatier Kransekagehuset Summerbird . “We are very much looking forward to the Oprah effect,” said Ulrika Maartensson, a spokeswoman for Wonderful Copenhagen , the city’s tourist and conference agency. Clashes between Danes and Swedes, which have led to 12 wars since 1360, have moved from the battlefield to PowerPoint slides as Copenhagen retaliates after its sister city last year passed it as Scandinavia’s most popular conference venue. While the Danish capital won high-profile events like the IOC and this week’s United Nations climate conference this year, the city is in danger of falling behind Stockholm as a destination for foreign tourists. The number of international tourists traveling to Stockholm rose 3 percent to 2.9 million last year, according to the city’s Visitor’s Board . The Swedish capital narrowed the gap with Copenhagen, where the figure rose 1 percent to 3.15 million, according to Statistics Denmark . Airport Expansion That reverses the trend of the late 1990s, when Copenhagen surged ahead after moving more quickly than Stockholm to invest in projects such as expanding its airport and promoting the city’s shopping and culture offerings, according to an analysis by Wonderful Copenhagen. The two cities may have equal numbers of foreign visitors within four years, the study said. “The development shows investments in know-how and the events economy are needed to achieve growth because results won’t come by themselves,” the analysis said. In response, Copenhagen hotels and businesses have pledged 8.3 million kroner ($1.64 million) to the “Meet Denmark” project aimed at promoting the nation and its capital as the site of international conferences. The Rotterdam, Netherlands-based International Fiscal Association booked Copenhagen for its 2013 Annual Congress. The choice was based on the meeting facility, the number of four-and five-star hotels and fairness in relation to other cities, the group said. The 1990 conference was held in Stockholm. “Because the conference usually lasts a week, it’s important that it can be combined with leisure activities,” said Thea Van Dijk, manager of the IFA General Secretariat. Founded by Hippies Copenhagen cultivates a laid back image, inviting tourists to visit Christiania , a collectively run village founded by hippies in 1971, and the bars of Nyhavn, which sit beside a 17th century canal. For the more traditional, there are the Little Mermaid statue, inspired by Hans Christian Andersen’s fairy tale of the same name, and Kronborg castle, the setting for William Shakespeare’s “Hamlet” north of the city. The city promotes itself as Scandinavia’s gastronomic capital. Thirteen restaurants received a total of 14 stars in the 2009 Michelin Guide, including chef Rene Redzepi’s Noma, a two-star eatery that uses only Nordic produce. This week’s climate summit provides a welcome boost of guests for Copenhagen’s fancy restaurants. “We’re extremely busy through December because of the summit,” said Cecilie Meyer, spokeswoman from Era Ora, a waterside, Michelin-stared Italian restaurant where a seven- course meal with a “Limited Edition” wine menu costs 4,000 kroner ($790) per person. Something for Oprah Oprah’s visit may help Copenhagen sell the city to international tourists, said Kathleen Leuba, a vice president at New York-based conference marketer Mondotels Inc. “For Americans, Oprah Winfrey is an extremely trustworthy person,” Leuba said. “Oprah’s presence in the picture will make a big difference. It demonstrates to tourists traveling that this is something Oprah enjoyed.” Stockholm calls itself the capital of Scandinavia, highlighting its place as the region’s biggest metropolitan area and home of its largest financial market . The city boasts of its own culinary excellence, with nine Michelin-starred restaurants, including Restaurant Mathias Dahlgren and Edsbacka Krog, each of which has two stars. Absolut Ice Bar The city is built on 14 islands, giving it the nickname “Venice of the North.” Top attractions include the medieval Old Town city center, the Vasa Museum , which features the world’s only preserved 17th century warship, and the Absolut Ice Bar, made of ice. The European Society of Cardiology expects about 30,000 people to attend its 2010 conference in Stockholm, the fifth time since 1991 the city has hosted the event. Stockholm International Fairs is one of the few venues that can provide the necessary space and services, the society said. “Our congress venue requirements are enormous and our expectations hard to meet,” said Ben Hainsworth, director of the group’s congress and meetings division. Both cities have major meeting venues located about 10 minutes by train from downtown. Copenhagen’s Bella Center , established in 1964, is the bigger of the two, with 122,000 square meters (1.31 million square feet) of halls and conference rooms. The expansion of Stockholm International Fairs, which opened in 1971, will boost space to 70,000 square meters next year. More International Flights Copenhagen has one major advantage over Stockholm: more international flights. Copenhagen has 15 intercontinental routes, four more than Stockholm’s Arlanda Airport, according to data from the Official Airline Guide. The city offers 87 European routes, 28 more than Stockholm. “We are constantly working on getting more direct lines,” said Peter Lindqvist, chief executive officer of Stockholm Visitors Board. Copenhagen’s weakening position has had economic consequences. Income from visitors who spend at least one night in the city may fall by 6 percent this year from about 32 billion kroner in 2008, according to Wonderful Copenhagen’s estimates. Stockholm earned 22 billion kronor from its visitors in 2008, unchanged from the previous year, the Visitors Board said. Preliminary numbers point to Copenhagen regaining its spot as Scandinavia’s international meeting capital this year with a seven-event lead, according to data from the Stockholm Visitors Board and Wonderful Copenhagen. The Danish capital also leads in events scheduled for 2010, though many are only reported after they’ve occurred. Royal Wedding Competition will increase next year when both cities add new venues. The Tivoli Congress Center , within walking distance from Copenhagen’s Town Hall Square, will seat as many as 2,500 people. The new Stockholm Waterfront Congress Center will have space for as many as 3,000. Stockholm is betting on help from Crown Princess Victoria’s wedding to long-time boyfriend Daniel Westling , Lindqvist said. Stockholm will have two weeks of festivities leading up to the June 19 wedding. Should Oprah decide to visit Stockholm, however, she’s more than welcome, Lindqvist said. To contact the reporter on this story: Janina Pfalzer in Stockholm at jpfalzer@bloomberg.net

Read the full article →

Prospects Fade for Global Warming Pact in Copenhagen

December 16, 2009

By Alex Morales and Jeremy van Loon Dec. 16 (Bloomberg) — World leaders will arrive in the Danish capital of Copenhagen over the next three days to agree on a pact to fight global warming. There may be nothing to sign. Envoys from China, the U.S., the European Union and India, the world’s top polluters, have bickered, quarreled and walked out during talks among 193 nations. They’ve left presidents and prime ministers a choice between a fudge or a flop for the accord that the United Nations framed as the most comprehensive deal to curb global warming. “Countries and blocks of countries have come here with very hard positions,” Guyana’s President Bharrat Jagdeo said yesterday in an interview in Copenhagen. “You need some seismic shifts to really close a deal.” Connie Hedegaard , chairwoman of the meeting, stepped down today, allowing Danish Prime Minister Lars Loekke Rasmussen to take over. She called the move “appropriate” with so many heads of state arriving. Officials had just announced efforts had failed to amend the 1997 Kyoto Protocol climate accord. The angst in conference rooms has been reflected on the streets, with protesters fighting riot police as Denmark mounted the biggest security operation in its history. More than half of Denmark’s 10,500 police are providing security for the talks at Copenhagen’s Bella Center, which can hold 15,000 people. The difficulty for the police is 46,000 people have tried to get into the talks in the city dubbed ‘Hopenhagen,’ leaving thousands waiting outside in freezing temperatures and yelling at security. Dubbed ‘Constipagen’ “We’re calling it Constipagen because the line’s not moving and the talks are not moving,” said Jasmine Hyman, who works for the Geneva-based Gold standard Foundation that certifies carbon offsets. She said it took her eight hours to get in. Speakers yesterday included Prince Charles , the heir to the U.K. throne, former U.S. Vice President Al Gore , who’s won an Oscar and a Nobel Peace Prize for his efforts to publicize the issue of global warming, and California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger . U.K. Prime Minister Gordon Brown arrived late Tuesday, while Obama will arrive later in the week. Developing nations accused industrialized countries of trying to kill off the Kyoto Protocol, the current emissions- limiting treaty. Developed nations, including the U.S. and Japan, want to replace Kyoto with another treaty. “The biggest obstacle to progress is that first it has to be clear that the Kyoto Protocol can’t disappear,” Mexican Environment Minister Juan Rafael Elvira Quesada said in an interview in Copenhagen. Disputes The U.S., the largest industrialized emitter, never ratified the Kyoto pact, which sets no binding emission targets for developing nations, such as India and China. The disputes in Copenhagen stem from the division of the UN talks into two tracks: one to extend Kyoto’s binding emissions targets beyond 2012 for all developed nations bar the U.S., and another to establish what the world’s biggest economy and developing nations will do to cut their emissions. The 27-nation European Union, which is bound by Kyoto, has called for the two negotiating tracks to be merged in favor of a single legally-binding treaty, a call rejected by poorer nations. Other developed nations support a single deal. Japanese View “The fundamental position of our government is that we are seeking a bigger comprehensive agreement than the Kyoto Protocol,” said Makio Miyakawa , Japan’s deputy director for global affairs at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, in a Dec. 14 interview. “But the developing countries are still sticking to the Kyoto Protocol. And their position is very firm.” Other issues dividing delegates include the size of emission reductions by developed nations, verifying emission reductions by developing countries and climate aid worth $100 billion a year from rich to poor nations. The U.S. has rejected the demands of developing nations and most developed countries that it cut emissions more than its current goal of 17 percent from 2005 levels. China and India don’t want their national commitments to become legally binding in an international treaty. Japan, the EU and other developed nations still haven’t come forward to say how much money they’re prepared to fork out past 2012 to help poorer nations adapt to the consequences of climate change and lower their emissions. “This remains a very, very difficult process, and it could still fail,” said U.K. Energy and Climate Change Secretary Ed Miliband . “It was always going to be the case that the most difficult bits would get left to the end. I hope ministers can sort them out. Some of them may be left to leaders.” To contact the reporter on this story: Jeremy van Loon in Copenhagen via jvanloon@bloomberg.net ; Alex Morales in Copenhagen via amorales2@bloomberg.net .

Read the full article →

Xie Overcame Toxic Spill to Become China’s Top Envoy at UN Climate Summit

December 16, 2009

By Bloomberg News Dec. 16 (Bloomberg) — Xie Zhenhua was head of China’s state environmental protection agency in 2005 when a toxic spill almost ended his career. Four years later, Xie leads a Chinese delegation at odds with the U.S. at Copenhagen’s climate talks. Xie, who resigned after an explosion at a PetroChina Co. plant spilled toxic chemicals into the Songhua River, is now in the Danish capital advocating China’s position that richer countries such as the United States should bear most of the burden for cutting carbon emissions blamed for global warming. China, the biggest CO2 emitter and fastest-growing major economy, has bristled under criticism from envoys including Japan’s Sakihito Ozawa who say any climate deal should contain numerical greenhouse-gas emissions targets for the worst polluters. Xie, 60, says nations like the U.S. created the problem and should agree to large cuts at the climate talks, not developing countries whose growth would be unfairly crimped. “Given the current situation, no country can reduce carbon-dioxide emissions so much when they are at that stage of development,” Xie told China Central Television on Dec. 7 from Copenhagen. Xie declined a Bloomberg request for an interview. “It is not reasonable and scientifically sound to make such demands of China,” Xie told reporters, CCTV said. China wants developed countries including the U.S., Japan and European Union members to give more financial and technical support to poorer nations to help curb the greenhouse gases that scientists say lead to climate change. The U.S. and many industrialized nations, conversely, say it’s critical that China and developing countries agree to a treaty that includes a way to measure, report and verify emission cuts. China’s Argument China’s argument that it has a per capita gross domestic product less than one-tenth of the U.S. with about 150 million people — or half the U.S.’s population — living in poverty hasn’t resonated with President Barack Obama’s climate envoy. Responding to criticism from China that the U.S. isn’t doing enough to cut greenhouse gases, U.S. negotiator Todd Stern said China must be a “major player” in the push to curb global emissions. “The country whose emissions are going up dramatically, really dramatically, is China,” Stern said in Copenhagen on Dec. 9. China’s cabinet on Nov. 26 said it will cut output of carbon dioxide per unit of gross domestic product by 40 percent to 45 percent from 2005 levels. Later that night, Xie, who brings 27 years of experience in environmental protection work to Copenhagen, told reporters meeting that goal would require a huge effort. ‘Personable, Approachable’ “Both Xie Zhenhua and Todd Stern are personable, approachable individuals as well as tough negotiators who do a good job in representing their own country’s interests,” said Barbara Finamore, China program director for the U.S.-based Natural Resources Defense Council. Finamore has worked with Xie since he was an environmental official almost two decades ago. A 2007 profile in the official Xinhua Daily Telegraph labeled Xie “the world’s most senior environmental protection chief,” attributing the Chinese envoy’s rehabilitation after his resignation two years earlier to his ability and because he “dared to take responsibility.” Like President Hu Jintao and Vice President Xi Jinping , Xie is a graduate of Beijing’s Tsinghua University, where he studied engineering physics, according to his official biography . Xie, to be joined by Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao in the Copenhagen negotiations that end Dec. 18, had to overcome a career-jeopardizing ecological disaster to even get to Denmark. International Incident The 2005 explosion at the PetroChina plant shut off drinking water supplies for 3 million people and became an international incident after it threatened to contaminate fish and water supplies for the Russian region of Khabarovsk, downstream from the spill. The spill led to Xie’s resignation after China’s cabinet said his organization hadn’t “paid due importance to the incident.” A year later, Xie, a native of the northeastern coastal city of Tianjin, was back in government as a vice chairman of China’s National Development and Reform Commission, the government super-ministry that oversees industrial policy. Xie’s portfolio now includes resource conservation, environmental protection and climate change. He holds ministerial rank and reports directly to the ruling Communist Party, according to his job description on the NDRC Web site. Known to Criticize The bespectacled Xie has shown he isn’t afraid to criticize his counterparts. At a March appearance at Washington’s Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, Xie blasted a proposal by U.S. Energy Secretary Steven Chu to put tariffs on products from countries that didn’t try to curb carbon emissions as “using climate protection as an excuse to implement trade protectionism.” To contact Bloomberg staff on this story: Michael Forsythe in Beijing at +86-10-6649-7580 or mforsythe@bloomberg.net Xiao Yu in Beijing at +86-6649-7564 yxiao@bloomberg.net

Read the full article →

UN Climate Envoys Clash Over Funding for Poor Nations

December 15, 2009

By Alex Morales and Jim Efstathiou Jr. Dec. 15 (Bloomberg) — United Nations negotiators failed to agree on financial aid that industrialized nations such as the U.S. and Japan will give to the developing world for coping with climate change, threatening a global-warming accord. With China and India seeking about $200 billion a year for developing states, envoys are bargaining over options for aid beginning after 2012, each without financial commitments, according to a draft agreement released today. The talks among 192 countries end Dec. 18, and developing nations say they’ll reject an accord to curb global warming that has no money. “This is eyewash — it’s a paper tiger,” Quamrul Chowdhury , a Bangladeshi envoy who coordinates the group of Least Developed Countries on finance issues, said in an interview. “There is nothing in terms of long-term finance.” Conflicts have deepened as the two-week summit progresses, with more than 110 world leaders due to arrive over the next three days. Delegates from developing nations caused several hours’ delay yesterday after walking out of discussions, citing an attempt by richer countries to kill off the existing global warming treaty, the 1997 Kyoto Protocol . U.S. President Barack Obama and Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao , are due to arrive in the Danish capital on Dec. 16 to 18 to help seal an agreement to rein in emissions. U.K. Prime Minister Gordon Brown is due to arrive two days ahead of schedule, and Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and Venezuelan leader Hugo Chavez are scheduled to attend. ‘In Positioning Mode’ “The real discussions begin in the next two or three days,” Andrew Deutz , director of international government relations at the Nature Conservancy, an environmental advocacy group in Arlington, Virginia, said today in an interview. “The signals that negotiators are sending here are still very much in the positioning mode for when the bosses come in.” China and India have both said developed countries should contribute at least an annual 0.5 percent of their economic output to developing nations to help them lower emissions and adapt to the effects of global warming, such as more severe droughts and higher sea levels. That amounts to about $200 billion a year at current levels. China criticized the most industrialized countries today and said they are threatening the success of the negotiations. Rich countries “have put forward a plethora of unreasonable requests to developing countries,” Chinese Foreign Ministry Spokeswoman Jiang Yu told reporters today in Beijing. “We believe this has a negative impact on the negotiations and will hamper the Copenhagen conference from achieving positive results.” $100 Billion Aid UN climate chief Yvo de Boer has said $100 billion to $300 billion a year in climate aid is needed. Developing countries including China and India will need as much as 100 billion euros ($145 billion) a year in climate aid from 2010 to 2020, New York-based McKinsey & Co. said in a September report. That’s to help them adapt to the effects of global warming and develop clean technologies to limit their own emissions. Two years of talks have repeatedly stalled amid clashes between rich and poor countries over aid, emission-reduction targets in developed countries and commitments to be made by industrialized nations to lower their own greenhouse gases. Deforestation Target The toughest issues at the talks in Copenhagen have been handed from country negotiators up to ministers, said Elliot Diringer , who oversees international strategies at the Pew Center on Global Climate Change, in Arlington, Virginia. Those include whether the agreement should aim to keep the global temperature increase from pre-industrial times to within 1.5 or 2 degrees Celsius, and climate aid, he said. Another issue being debated in Copenhagen is how the funds will be managed. Developing countries are pressing for the UN to have oversight of the funding rather than international institutions such as the World Bank and its Global Environment Facility agency, which they say doesn’t favor them. Draft portions of text seen by Bloomberg show that envoys are debating delaying decisions on how climate funds will be named, how they will operate, and how the UN will work with the Global Environment Facility until the next UN climate meeting in Mexico at the end of 2010. “We don’t even have the name, the function or anything: we have nothing,” Bangladesh’s Chowdhury said. “This is not a tolerant outcome.” The new negotiating text also includes a target to cut the rate of deforestation in developing nations 50 percent by 2020. Microsoft, Dow Chemical “I’ve been doing forest issues in UN process for 15 years,” said Deutz, “We’ve never gotten agreement on a global target.” More than two dozen U.S. companies including Dow Chemical Co., and Microsoft Corp., today urged Obama to deliver a climate agreement that includes “significant” reduction targets and “substantial” climate funding for developing countries. The companies signed a letter they delivered to Obama, according to Peyton Fleming , a spokesman for Ceres, a coalition of investors and environmental activists. “We must put the United States on the path to significant emissions reductions, a stronger economy and a new position of leadership to stabilize our climate,” according to the letter. “The costs of inaction far outweigh the costs of actions.” To contact the reporter on this story: Alex Morales in Copenhagen via amorales2@bloomberg.net ; Jim Efstathiou Jr . in Copenhagen at jefstathiou@bloomberg.net .

Read the full article →

Developing Countries Say `No Money, No Deal’ as Climate Talks Await Obama

December 13, 2009

By Jeremy van Loon and Kim Chipman Dec. 14 (Bloomberg) — Four days before 110 world leaders fly to Copenhagen to complete a deal to curb global warming, negotiators are far apart on aid to poorer countries and how to verify nations fulfill their pledges to reduce greenhouse gases. Envoys from 192 countries discussing a climate-protection accord in the Danish capital released a draft on Dec. 11 that shows they cannot agree on how to police an agreement. The document contains no subsidies to help developing nations cut carbon-dioxide emissions and adapt to climate change. “No money, no deal,” Selwin Hart , a Barbadian envoy who speaks on finance issues for 43 island and low-lying states, said in an interview. “Financing will be critical.” United Nations climate chief Yvo de Boer said developing nations need at least $100 billion a year. As obstacles built up during the first week of the talks, senior U.S. negotiator Todd Stern flew to the Danish capital earlier than planned as did his Chinese counterpart, Xie Zhenhua . Their bosses, President Barack Obama and Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao , will arrive with other world leaders before the talks end Dec. 18. “This is probably the most intense and high-level negotiating session we’ve ever had on the climate issue, and I’ve been to all of them since the Rio Earth Summit in 1992,” Alden Meyer , director of policy at the U.S.-based Union of Concerned Scientists, said in an interview. Delegates have argued over devising a new treaty for almost two years. They’ve met in cities from Bonn to Bangkok to discuss how to reduce the amount of carbon dioxide that gets pumped into the atmosphere. Greenhouse gases trap heat that otherwise would radiate back toward space, raising global temperatures, disrupting weather patterns and increasing sea levels. ‘Catastrophic’ Climate Change Developing countries including China and India will need as much as 100 billion euros ($145 billion) a year in climate aid from 2010 to 2020, New York-based McKinsey & Co. said in a September report. That’s to help avoid “catastrophic” climate change, McKinsey said. McKinsey estimates annual gas discharges must be lowered by 2020 to 44 billion tons from a predicted 61 billion to keep the planet’s average temperature from rising more than 2 degrees Celsius (3.6 degrees Fahrenheit) from pre-industrial times. Any Copenhagen climate deal may be ineffective, said Bjoern Lomborg , a business professor of the Copenhagen Business school. “My problem with this conference is that we’ll promise again to cut carbon, we’ll make a grand document, and then actually won’t live up to it,” Lomborg said in an interview. The arrival later this week of about 110 heads of state and government, including Obama and Wen, may lead to a breakthrough, the UN’s de Boer said. Iberdrola, Vestas “As we move closer to the moment when heads of state begin to arrive, we need to focus on the bigger picture,” he said. “The serious discussion on targets and finance has yet to begin.” Mobilizing of billions of dollars in climate aid from industrialized nations to pay for clean energy in developing countries would be positive for business, Iberdrola SA Chief Executive Officer Jose Ignacio Sanchez Galan said in an interview. Bilbao, Spain-based Iberdrola is the world’s biggest wind-energy generator. “We’ve bet on clean energy, and anything that takes the world in the direction of clean energy is going to be positive for Iberdrola,” he said. That view is echoed by Ditlev Engel , chief executive of Vestas A/S, the largest wind-turbine maker. ‘New Behavior’ “The world will benefit from $100 billion in financing if approved, not just Vestas ,” he said in an interview. “Energy consumption will increase dramatically in the years to come, so what we need to have here is a deal that will facilitate a lot of new behavior.” The U.S. and European Union have called for $10 billion a year for developing states from Jan. 1 through 2012. The EU promised to provide about a third of that, while Canada has no pledge and the U.S. says it will pay its “fair share.” “Ten billion is not sufficient for adaptation,” said Chinese negotiator Su Wei , in an interview. Emerging economies such as China say rich nations have a long history of reneging on pledges to aid poor countries. The U.S. and many industrialized nations say it’s critical that China and developing countries agree to a treaty that includes a way to measure, report and verify promised cuts in gases. Ronald Reagan Principle “This is like the Ronald Reagan principle,” said Fred Krupp , head of the New York-based advocacy group Environmental Defense. “When he was negotiating arms controls agreement the mantra was ‘trust but verify.’” Verifying voluntary emission cuts “would be very intrusive,” India’s environment minister, Jairam Ramesh , said in a briefing Dec. 11. The U.S. doesn’t allow other nations to inspect its biological weapons, he said. China also refuses to have its voluntary reductions of CO2 emission per unit of economic growth verified by international bodies, said China’s Vice Foreign Minister He Yafei on Dec. 11. “It’s a matter of principle,” he added. Senators including John Kerry , a Massachusetts Democrat, say the verification issue with regard to China is crucial. It’s “the single most important ingredient,” he said in an interview last week. Without comparable action from China, the U.S. Senate, the only U.S. body authorized to ratify treaties, is unlikely to approve a new accord. Senators rejected the 1997 Kyoto Protocol under the Clinton administration because it didn’t require China and other developing countries to reduce emissions. China and developing nations are demanding that only rich countries have legally binding targets, while some industrialized nations are calling for enforceable reductions for poor countries. “The key and prerequisite for a successful conference is that developed countries live up to responsibilities on financing and emissions targets,” China’s He said. Countries’ pledges so far will reduce annual emissions to about 49 billion tons in 2020, above the 40 billion tons maximum needed to achieve the 2-degree temperature target, PriceWaterhouseCoopers said in a report yesterday. To contact the reporters on this story: Jeremy van Loon in Copenhagen via jvanloon@bloomberg.net ; Kim Chipman in Copenhagen at KChipman@bloomberg.net ; Alex Morales in Copenhagen via amorales2@bloomberg.net

Read the full article →

Soros Seeks $100 Billion in IMF Funds for Green Plan

December 10, 2009

By Jeremy van Loon and Sandrine Rastello Dec. 10 (Bloomberg) — Billionaire George Soros asked the richest nations to use $100 billion of foreign-exchange reserves to finance emissions-reducing projects in poor countries. The reserves, from the International Monetary Fund, would go into a green fund to “jump start” investments in rain forests, agriculture and land use that would lower carbon- dioxide emissions, the financier said today at climate negotiations involving more than 190 nations in Copenhagen . Soros, who has already pledged to invest $1 billion he manages in clean-energy technology, said his proposal is a catalyst for industrialized countries negotiating how to finance carbon-cutting efforts in the Danish capital. “Developed countries’ governments are laboring under the misapprehension that funding has to come from the national budgets but that is not the case,” Soros, 79, said at a news briefing. “They have it already. It is lying idle in their reserves accounts and in the vaults” of the IMF. The plan Soros is proposing would be in addition to long- term funding being discussed by negotiators at the United Nations talks, he said. Poor nations are demanding 1 percent of global gross domestic product annually from richer countries to help them adapt to climate change as well as reduce their own emissions. Protecting forests and planting trees where forests have already been cut down requires money for supplies, monitoring and enforcement. Delegates in the UN-led talks are studying proposals for awarding project investors with tradable “carbon credits” — representing the emissions avoided — that they could sell to regulated polluters such as power plants. ‘Soros Knows’ “Soros knows the importance of long-term investment in terms of a transition to a low-carbon economy,” Jonathan Jacoby , a private-sector adviser at Oxfam, said ahead of today’s announcement. “Private investors are looking first for public capital for a down payment.” The money would be offered for 25 years to start projects in forestry, agriculture and land use, Soros said. “These are the areas that offer the greatest scope for reducing carbon emissions and could produce substantial returns from carbon markets,” he said. There will be objections to using money for financing that was meant for reserves, Soros said, without saying who may support his green-fund proposal. A drawback to the plan is that U.S. legislators must be convinced to make the reserves available, Soros said. Even without the U.S., there would be about $100 billion that other countries could free up for the fund. Because trees absorb carbon dioxide, the main greenhouse gas scientists blame for climate change, investments to save forests and use land in ways that avoid emissions has been backed by UN officials for more than a decade. ‘A Win-Win’ “This is a win-win opportunity for developed and developing countries to work together,” Soros said. Negotiators have been working for two years to find ways to pay poor countries about $10 billion annually to help them cope with climate change. After spending hundreds of billions bailing out banks this year and last, industrialized nations have so far failed to reach an agreement on financing to help developing countries manage global warming. The Washington-based IMF in August pumped the equivalent of $250 billion into its 186 members’ foreign reserves, acting on an April call from leaders of the Group of 20 nations to boost global liquidity. The money is denominated in what are called special drawing rights, the IMF unit of account based on the dollar, yen, pound and euro. It was artificially added to reserves and can be converted into hard currencies. Climate change “is really an existential problem for the world,” said Soros. “The fund should be invested in such a way that it could potentially provide a return.” To contact the reporters on this story: Jeremy van Loon in Copenhagen via jvanloon@bloomberg.net Sandrine Rastello in Washington at srastello@bloomberg.net

Read the full article →

Video: UN’s De Boer Targets Global Climate Treaty by June 2010

December 7, 2009

Dec. 7 (Bloomberg) — Yvo de Boer, head of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, talks with Bloomberg’s Ryan Chilcote in Copenhagen about the outlook for negotiations on an international agreement to control greenhouse-gas emissions. Talks among 192 nations about a climate change deal open today in the Danish capital. (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Swine Flu, Seasonal Flu Death Rates Aren’t Comparable, WHO Report Says

December 4, 2009

By Jason Gale Dec. 4 (Bloomberg) — The World Health Organization, facing criticism that it exaggerated the threat of swine flu, said it’s too soon to decide whether the pandemic is more or less deadly than seasonal flu and comparing death rates may be misleading. Mortality from the new H1N1 strain is “unquestionably higher” than the death toll reported by national authorities, the Geneva-based agency said in a report seen by Bloomberg News before its scheduled publication today. Deaths totaled more than 7,820 as of Nov. 22, said WHO, which estimates as many as 500,000 people die each year from seasonal strains. Health authorities worldwide are assessing whether their response to swine flu is justified by its threat as cases of flu-like illness retreat in the U.S. and U.K. While a majority of patients recover within days and reported fatalities are a fraction of the seasonal flu toll, these figures mask the full impact of swine flu on society, WHO said. “Compared with seasonal influenza, the H1N1 virus affects a much younger age group in all categories — those most frequently infected, hospitalized, requiring intensive care, and dying,” WHO said in the report. In Australia, about 3,000 people aged 50 or older die from seasonal flu each year, according to statistical modeling . Officials counted 190 deaths associated with confirmed swine flu, Jim Bishop, the nation’s chief medical officer, said last week in a report in the New England Journal of Medicine. Younger Victims The median age of patients who died was 53 years, compared with 83 year in seasonal epidemics, and the number of patients treated in intensive care units for viral pneumonia was about 14 times greater than normal, Bishop said in a telephone interview from Canberra today. “It’s a different type of virus affecting younger people and putting more people into hospital and ICU,” he said. “It’s not attacking older people in nursing homes.” Bishop said WHO’s decision to declare swine flu a pandemic in June helped guide the nation’s response, which he said was “proportionate and relevant.” The United Nations agency moved to the top level of its pandemic alert following advice from a group of scientists and health officials who may have ties to the pharmaceutical industry, Sweden’s Svenska Dagbladet newspaper said last week, citing reports in Danish newspaper Information and Science magazine. WHO spokesman Gregory Hartl told the newspaper that the decision to declare a pandemic was made by Director General Margaret Chan alone. ‘Machine Grinding’ In July, epidemiologist Tom Jefferson told Germany’s Der Spiegel that WHO, public health officials, virologists and pharmaceutical companies may have had ulterior motives in promoting the pandemic threat. “They’ve built this machine around the impending pandemic,” Jefferson was quoted as saying. “There’s a lot of money involved, and influence, and careers, and entire institutions,” he said. “All it took was one of these influenza viruses to mutate to start the machine grinding.” Public perceptions about the pandemic and national preparedness plans have been influenced since 2004 by the threat of bird flu, “widely regarded as the virus most likely to ignite the next influenza pandemic,” WHO said in a statement yesterday. The H5N1 strain of avian influenza killed 59 percent of the 444 people known to have been infected, according to WHO. Ulterior Motives “Adjusting public perceptions to suit a far less lethal virus has been problematic,” WHO said. “Given the discrepancy between what was expected and what has happened, a search for ulterior motives on the part of WHO and its scientific advisers is understandable, though without justification.” Since April, at least 622,482 people have been infected with the virus in more than 207 countries and territories, according to WHO. Swine flu infections and deaths reported to WHO are based on laboratory confirmed tests rather than mathematical modeling used to estimate fatalities from seasonal flu, the agency said. “With the current pandemic, we really have data which is almost an anomaly, when we look at how influenza has been counted in the past,” Keiji Fukuda , WHO’s special adviser on pandemic influenza, told reporters on a conference call from London yesterday. “People do not typically count influenza deaths on a one-by-one basis. And so, we do not have a lot of data on laboratory-confirmed deaths for seasonal influenza.” Accurate assessments of deaths and mortality rates will probably be possible only one to two years after the pandemic has peaked, WHO said. To contact the reporter on this story: Jason Gale in Singapore at j.gale@bloomberg.net

Read the full article →

Almunia Named as EU’s Competition Commissioner, Barnier to Oversee Finance

November 27, 2009

By Jonathan Stearns Nov. 27 (Bloomberg) — Jose Barroso picked Spain’s Joaquin Almunia to be the European Union’s antitrust chief and France’s Michel Barnier to lead a push for tougher bank regulation on a new team that will manage the EU’s $15 trillion economy as it emerges from the recession . Barroso, president of the European Commission, also chose Olli Rehn of Finland as economy commissioner and Karel De Gucht of Belgium as the EU’s top trade negotiator. Denmark’s Connie Hedegaard will be climate commissioner, Germany’s Guenther Oettinger energy chief and Italy’s Antonio Tajani industrial- policy head. The new five-year team will take office as Europe is recovering from the credit crunch and the worst recession in more than half a century. Under Barroso, the EU’s executive arm has cracked down on cartels, pledged to sharpen scrutiny of banks, hedge funds and credit-rating companies , forced industry to reduce emissions blamed for climate change and broken down national barriers in the EU electricity and natural-gas markets. “ This team is a perfect blend of experience and new thinking,” Barroso told reporters today in Brussels. Almunia, Rehn, De Gucht and Tajani are currently commissioners in other areas, while Barnier is a French member of the European Parliament and Hedegaard and Oettinger are newcomers to EU jobs. Global Clout Europe aims for more global clout as a new European governing treaty takes effect and the top EU political and regulatory jobs are filled. Last week, European government heads named Belgium’s Herman Van Rompuy as the EU’s first president and Catherine Ashton of the U.K. as top diplomat — two posts created by the new treaty. The commission proposes legislation, enforces antitrust laws, manages trade policy and administers the bloc’s 123 billion-euro ($184 billion) budget. The leadership team generally balances the demands of big countries for the most influential posts and a need to ensure a degree of independence from national governments, which put forward the candidates for commissioners while letting Barroso assign the portfolios. The lineup proposed today by Barroso will have to win approval from the EU Parliament, which plans to hold hearings with individual commissioners in mid-January before a vote. In 2004, the assembly delayed the start of Barroso’s first term for three weeks by forcing changes to some of his initial team of commissioners. Five Years Barroso, a former Portuguese prime minister, himself won reappointment as commission president in September. In the past five years, the commission has used its regulatory powers to impose record antitrust fines, including a penalty of 1.06 billion euros on Intel Corp. for abuses of competition and fines of 553 million euros each on GDF Suez SA of France and Germany’s E.ON AG for colluding on gas sales. Neelie Kroes , the current EU competition commissioner, led that campaign and will stay on as the Dutch appointee to the new commission to become European telecommunications chief. Almunia will take over the antitrust job after being economy commission, overseeing the expansion of countries using the euro and seeking to maintain the credibility of EU budget- deficit limits as national spending surged amid the recession. Barroso called the Spanish Socialist “one of the best commissioners of the last five years.” Almunia’s Finnish successor in the economy post has been EU enlargement commissioner, steering policy toward aspiring members in the Balkans including Turkey, Croatia and Serbia after 10 mainly ex-communist countries joined in 2004. The Czech Republic’s Stefan Fule is moving from his job as that country’s European affairs minister to be the new EU enlargement chief, who must also manage a membership bid from Iceland. Trade Job Belgium’s De Gucht moves from development commissioner to the top EU trade job, marking the first time in more than a decade that an appointee from a smaller EU state will hold that post. Ashton has been trade commissioner since succeeding fellow Briton Peter Mandelson , who followed France’s Pascal Lamy , now head of the World Trade Organization. The fallout from the 2008 collapse of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. prompted the commission to turn its sights to stricter financial-market rules — the focus of Barnier’s job and a priority of French President Nicolas Sarkozy . The commission proposed in April the first EU law on hedge funds and buyout firms, seeking to force money managers to report regularly on their main investments, performance and risks. In September, as part of plans for the most sweeping overhaul of financial regulation, the commission presented draft legislation that would create an economic-risk watchdog led by central bankers and agencies to unify oversight of banks, insurers, investment firms and credit-rating companies. Money Managers Charlie McCreevy oversaw these initiatives and is being replaced as Ireland’s appointee to the commission by Maire Geoghegan-Quinn, who is due to become research commissioner. Hedegaard, now Danish climate and energy minister, will oversee a possible EU decision to force energy and manufacturing companies in the world’s biggest greenhouse-gas market to deepen emissions cuts. The EU is already on course to cut greenhouse gases including carbon dioxide by 20 percent in 2020 compared with 1990. The bloc is due to decide at a United Nations climate summit in Copenhagen next month whether to deepen that reduction target to 30 percent over the period. Tajani has held the post of transport commissioner, which will go to Estonia’s Siim Kallas , currently commissioner for administration. Oettinger, who has been governor of the German state of Baden-Wuerttemberg, takes over the energy job from Latvia’s Andris Piebalgs , who becomes development commissioner. To contact the reporter on this story: Jonathan Stearns in Brussels at jstearns2@bloomberg.net

Read the full article →

Siemens Hearing-Aid Division Said to Draw Interest From KKR, BC Partners

November 26, 2009

By Aaron Kirchfeld Nov. 27 (Bloomberg) — Siemens AG’s hearing aid business, valued at as much as 3 billion euros ($4.5 billion), is drawing interest from private-equity firms including KKR & Co. L.P. and BC Partners Ltd., two people familiar with the matter said. Several financial investors have contacted the Munich-based company about buying the unit, said the people, who requested anonymity because the process isn’t public. Siemens has been in contact with investment banks about options, and hasn’t decided whether to sell the unit or conduct an initial public offering, though an exit from the business is likely, the people said. Siemens claims the No. 1 position in the global hearing aid market by units manufactured. It trails Sonova Holding AG of Switzerland and William Demant Holding A/S of Denmark by market share, according to Sonova. Siemens, Europe’s largest engineering company, is weighing a retreat from the industry to sharpen its focus on energy, transport and infrastructure, as well as on medical diagnostics tools, the people said. In addition to private-equity firms, makers of medical equipment may also be interested, the people said. Antitrust hurdles would bar Sonova and William Demant from a takeover, the people said. Siemens spokesman Constantin Birnstiel declined to comment, as did spokespeople for KKR and BC Partners in Germany. High Margins “Siemens hearing aids is attractive because the sector has relatively high margins and the business could be further improved by a new owner,” said Daniel Jelovcan , a Zurich-based health-care products analyst at Helvea AG. He estimates the unit could be valued at 2.5 billion euros to 3 billion euros, based on estimated sales of 680 million euros and peer valuation. Siemens, which also makes high-speed trains, power grids and medical scanners, doesn’t disclose sales for its hearing aids. The company has been making the products for more than 100 years , and the business is based in Erlangen in southern Germany, home to some of Siemens’s largest production sites. The unit may fetch 2 billion euros to 3 billion euros in a sale, the people said. The engineering company will likely pursue a so-called dual-track process of seeking a buyer while simultaneously preparing an IPO for 2010, the people said. The company followed a similar strategy with its VDO automotive division, which it sold to Continental AG for 11.4 billion euros in 2007 after simultaneously holding sales talks and preparing an IPO. Past Deals KKR has done deals with Siemens in the past. The private- equity firm run by Henry Kravis and George Roberts bought Wincor Nixdorf AG, a maker of bank machines, in 1999 from Siemens, as well as seven engineering units for 1.69 billion euros, including Demag Cranes AG, in 2002. Sonova Chief Executive Officer Valentin Chapero said on Nov. 14 it “wouldn’t be surprising” if Siemens sold its hearing-aid unit because it’s not “well adapted” to the rest of the German company’s business. The Swiss company has gained 87 percent so far this year, valuing Sonova at 7.77 billion Swiss francs ($7.74 billion). William Demant has a market value of 21.3 billion Danish kroner ($4.3 billion) after doubling in value in the last year. Other competitors include closely held Kind Hoergeraete, based in Hanover, Germany, and Fielmann AG , the German eyeframe manufacturer, which is branching out into hearing aids as an ageing population and ear damage caused by loud music increase the number of people with hearing disabilities. Hermann Requardt , the chief executive officer of Siemens’s health-care division, said on Sept. 29 at a meeting with analysts and investors that the hearing aids are “a very solid business and a strong contributor.” To contact the reporter on this story: Aaron Kirchfeld in Frankfurt at akirchfeld@bloomberg.net

Read the full article →

Obama to Offer 17% Emissions-Cut Goal at UN Climate Summit in Copenhagen

November 25, 2009

By Kim Chipman Nov. 26 (Bloomberg) — President Barack Obama will travel to Copenhagen for climate-change talks, where he’ll offer to cut U.S. emissions about 17 percent by 2020 in an effort to help break a deadlock between rich and poor nations. Obama will visit the Danish capital on Dec. 9 during negotiations on a global climate treaty. The U.S. will propose cutting its emissions “in the range of 17 percent” from 2005 levels by 2020, Carol Browner , Obama’s top adviser on energy and the environment, told reporters yesterday. It will be the first time the U.S. has offered such a target. U.S. legislation backed by Obama to cut greenhouse gases and establish a market for the trading of pollution allowances passed the House in June and then stalled in the Senate. Administration officials said they aren’t going to Denmark empty-handed and Obama’s attendance will send a strong signal. “The president going to Copenhagen will give positive momentum to the negotiations,” Michael Froman , Obama’s deputy national security adviser for international economics, told reporters yesterday. “We think it will enhance the prospects for success.” Negotiations for a new global climate treaty have been stymied as industrialized nations and developing countries failed to agree on issues such as emissions-reduction targets and how much financial help rich nations should provide to poor ones. China and India have said industrialized countries must be willing to cut their carbon output 40 percent from 1990 levels by 2020 if they expect poorer nations to agree to long-term reduction goals. ‘Ambitious Actions’ The Obama administration hopes other major economies will “put forth ambitious actions of their own,” Browner said. Obama, who campaigned on a pledge to tackle climate change, has been under pressure to attend the meeting and offer a 2020 reduction target. The U.S., the biggest greenhouse-gas producer among developed nations, has faced criticism for failing to enact legislation. Obama’s attendance is “critical,” Yvo de Boer , executive secretary of the UN Framework Convention of Climate Change, which runs the talks, said yesterday in a Webcast from Bonn. “The world is very much looking to the U.S. to come up with an emissions reduction target” as well as financial aid to help developing countries cut emissions and adapt to global warming, de Boer said. The proposed U.S. emissions reduction is in line with the pending legislation in Congress. The House-passed measure calls for a 17 percent reduction while a version in the Senate calls for a cut of 20 percent. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid , a Nevada Democrat, said last week that his chamber won’t take up legislation until “sometime in the spring.” ‘Global Game-Changer’ Obama’s decision to go to Copenhagen could prod Congress, Senator John Kerry , a Massachusetts Democrat who has sought a bipartisan compromise on the Senate climate bill, said in a statement. It “could be one hell of a global game-changer with big reverberations here at home,” he said. The president’s plans were also welcomed by companies such as DuPont Co. that are pushing for a cap on U.S. carbon-dioxide pollution that scientists blame for climate change. It “sends a message that addressing climate and energy challenges are priorities for the U.S.,” Michael Parr, manager of government affairs for Wilmington, Delaware-based DuPont, the third-biggest U.S. chemical maker, said in a statement. “Obama has a great story to tell,” James Roger , chief executive officer of Duke Energy Corp. , said in an interview last week, citing House passage of climate legislation and the adoption of greenhouse-gas standards for vehicles. Duke owns electric utilities in the U.S. Southeast and Midwest. ‘Weak and Unfair’ Dissenting from the praise, Friends of the Earth said Obama’s administration has “pushed for a weak and unfair” climate accord. “The president needs to do more than just show up,” Erich Pica , president of the Washington-based environmental group, said in a statement. “He must ensure that the U.S. promotes real solutions.” Danish Prime Minister Lars Loekke Rasmussen has invited the heads of almost 200 countries to the Danish capital for the last two days of the Dec. 7-18 meeting. So far, at least 65 leaders have said they will attend. They include German Chancellor Angela Merkel , U.K. Prime Minister Gordon Brown and Japanese Prime Minister Yukio Hatoyama . Political Agreement Leaders including Obama have said that a binding accord for reducing greenhouse gases isn’t expected in Copenhagen. The UN had previously said the meeting would mark the deadline for completing a treaty. Instead, leaders are now calling for a “meaningful” political agreement as a framework for a final accord to replace to replace the 1997 Kyoto Protocol, which expires in 2012. Negotiations are expected to continue next year. Obama’s visit to Copenhagen, during the first of two weeks of climate talks, will be followed the next day by a stop in Oslo to accept the Nobel Peace Prize. To contact the reporter on this story: Kim Chipman in Washington at kchipman@bloomberg.net .

Read the full article →

APEC Leaders Conclude Climate Treaty Is Out of Reach for Copenhagen Summit

November 16, 2009

By Julianna Goldman and Daniel Ten Kate Nov. 16 (Bloomberg) — Asia-Pacific leaders conceded a binding global-warming accord at next month’s climate summit in Copenhagen is out of reach and aimed to strike a political deal that will push a more comprehensive deal down the road. U.S. President Barack Obama and other leaders gathered for the Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation forum in Singapore agreed on a two-step approach to negotiating a replacement for the Kyoto Protocol presented by Danish Prime Minister Lars Loekke Rasmussen , who is leading the group overseeing the United Nations-sponsored climate talks. “Even if we may not hammer out the last dots of a legally binding instrument, I do believe a political binding agreement with specific commitment to mitigation and finance provides a strong basis for immediate action in the years to come,” Rasmussen said. Rasmussen flew overnight to Singapore to brief the group on the status of the talks. The APEC meeting is the last major gathering of world leaders before the start of the climate summit on Dec. 7 in the Danish capital. There was an “assessment by the leaders that it was unrealistic to expect a full, internationally legally binding agreement to be negotiated between now and when Copenhagen starts in 22 days,” Michael Froman , Obama’s deputy national security adviser for international economic affairs, told reporters. They thought “it was important that Copenhagen be an important step forward.” Lowered Expectations The statements by members of a group that includes the world’s two largest emitters, the U.S. and China, scale back expectations for the Copenhagen meeting, where negotiators from nearly 200 countries set a deadline to devise a successor to the 1997 Kyoto treaty , which expires in 2012. Two years of talks have stalled as developing countries call on richer nations to cut output first. Russian President Dmitry Medvedev said a political agreement on climate change can give impetus to further negotiations, his chief aide, Arkady Dvorkovich , told reporters. “The heads of state said they are ready to strike a political agreement,” the aide said. A decision on an additional meeting to continue climate negotiations will likely be made in Copenhagen, UNFCCC spokesman John Hay said today . There is already a June meeting scheduled in Bonn and a summit planned in Mexico City in November 2010. Rasmussen proposed a new strategy to reach a binding agreement on reducing greenhouse gases. The outcome in Copenhagen should be a 5-8 page document with “precise language of a comprehensive political agreement,” he said. Negotiations to come up with a binding legal treaty would then continue. ‘Off the Hook’ “We are not aiming to let anyone off the hook,” Rasmussen said. “We are trying to create a framework that will allow everybody to commit.” Climate negotiations have been hung up by disagreements between developed and emerging economies on binding emissions targets. UN officials have previously said a treaty was unlikely to emerge from the Copenhagen summit. Obama said that it was important not to make “the perfect the enemy of the good,” Froman said. The U.S. president said the best option for pursuing a global climate accord was to “see if we could reach the sort of accord that the Danish prime minister laid out that would have immediate operational impact” as a step in ongoing negotiations, Froman said. Rasmussen’s report to APEC leaders came at a breakfast meeting arranged in the last 36 hours. Climate change was among the main topics on the agenda for the APEC forum, whose member account for about half the world’s economy. The meeting was organized by Australian Prime Minister Kevin Rudd and Mexican President Felipe Calderon . China’s Role China’s President Hu Jintao called climate change “a grave challenge to mankind” and pledged to work for “positive outcomes” in Copenhagen during a speech today to APEC leaders. China has pledged to cut emissions in proportion to economic growth, without giving specific goals or saying whether he would include it in a global agreement. The world’s most populous nation is key to proposals for reducing global emissions. Without new international limits on greenhouse gases, annual discharges will surge 40 percent in the 2007-2030 period to 40.2 billion tons, with three-quarters of the increase coming from China, the Paris-based International Energy Agency has estimated. Industrialized nations want developing countries such as China and India to outline programs that will curb output of heat-trapping gases. The two fastest-growing major economies baulk at binding emission targets because their energy usage is projected to rise as more people are lifted out of poverty. U.S. Reaffirmation In Tokyo on Nov. 13, Obama reaffirmed the U.S. is committed to reducing carbon emissions by 80 percent by 2050 and endorsed proposals to reduce global emissions by 50 percent that same year. APEC leaders discussed dropping the 50 percent reduction target from their final summit statement, a member of the Chinese delegation said in a telephone interview. Obama hasn’t decided whether he will attend the Copenhagen meeting, Froman said. Denmark last week sent letters inviting all 191 government leaders of the United Nations to attend the Dec. 7-18 summit. To contact the reporters on this story: Julianna Goldman in Singapore at jgoldman6@bloomberg.net Daniel Ten Kate in Singapore at dtenkate@bloomberg.net

Read the full article →

Renault Targets U.S. Partner Better Place for French Electric-Car Network

November 11, 2009

By Laurence Frost Nov. 11 (Bloomberg) — Renault SA plans to bring in U.S. partner Better Place to run its future electric-car charging network in its home market of France, Chief Operating Officer Patrick Pelata said. Besides recharging stations planned by Electricite de France SA , the country needs the California startup’s battery- swapping service to maximize demand for electric vehicles, Pelata said in an interview yesterday at Renault’s headquarters in the Paris suburb of Boulogne-Billancourt. “We’re working on having it in France,” Pelata said. “Nobody else is working with this business model, so it’s probably going to be with Better Place.” Starting in 2012, drivers of electric Renault cars in Israel and Denmark will use Better Place’s roadside stations to switch depleted batteries for recharged units in three minutes, extending their effective range beyond a single charge. In France, the government has appointed state-owned EDF to roll out a recharging network that may be open to rival power suppliers and operators. Renault, France’s second-biggest carmaker, and Japanese affiliate Nissan Motor Co. are committed to investing 4 billion euros ($6 billion) in the electric vehicles and batteries that they plan to begin introducing in 2012. Another 1 billion euros has been pledged by the French government to stimulate demand for the models. ‘Uncomfortable’ Range Without swapping stations, “anybody who drives more than 120 or 130 kilometers from time to time will be uncomfortable with the 160-kilometer (100-mile) range” that batteries are likely to offer, Pelata said. “We’re expanding the volume potential for the car.” The Israeli and Danish plans require power utilities to support Palo Alto-based Better Place as a front-line operator that supplies the batteries, runs charging and swapping facilities and bills customers for usage and power. Shai Agassi , the U.S. company’s founding president, acknowledged resistance from EDF in a Sept. 15 interview and said the utility shouldn’t regard him as a competitor. Both sides needed to “leave egos behind” in talks on their roles in the French rollout, Agassi said at the Frankfurt Motor Show. A spokeswoman at Paris-based EDF said the company had no comment. Better Place “would be happy to work with Renault to develop the French market,” Agassi said in an e-mailed response to Pelata’s comments. To contact the reporter on this story: Laurence Frost in Paris at lfrost4@bloomberg.net .

Read the full article →

Obama Tells Olympic Committee Chicago Is Eager to Host 2016 Summer Games

October 2, 2009

By John McCormick and Edwin Chen Oct. 2 (Bloomberg) — U.S. President Barack Obama pitched the diversity and preparedness of Chicago to the International Olympic Committee as he sought to help his adopted hometown win the 2016 Summer Olympics. “I come here today as a passionate supporter of the Olympic and Paralympic Games, as a strong believer in the movement they represent, and as a proud Chicagoan,” Obama told the IOC in Copenhagen. “I come as a faithful representative of the American people. We look forward to welcoming the world to the shores of Lake Michigan and the heartland of our nation.” The IOC is voting later today and will pick a winner from among Chicago, Madrid, Rio de Janeiro and Tokyo. Obama spoke to a cavernous meeting hall with about 1,000 people on the floor, seated along rows of tables. He billed the Olympic movement as fitting with his views on global diplomacy and described how Chicago’s diversity and “tapestry of distinctive neighborhoods” welcomed him when he arrived in 1985. “My family moved around a lot,” he said, as a sea of cell-phone cameras snapped photos of him. “I never really had roots in any one place or culture or ethnic group. Then I came to Chicago.” Obama called it a “city where I finally found a home.” Putting his popularity on the line, Obama made a personal appeal by pointing to his own election in making his case for Chicago. Obama Election “Nearly one year ago, on a clear November night, people from every corner of the world gathered in the city of Chicago or in front of their televisions,” he said. “Their interest wasn’t about me as an individual. Rather, it was rooted in the belief that America’s experiment in democracy still speaks to a set of universal aspirations and ideals.” The president noted that the Olympic stadium would be just three blocks from his red brick home in Chicago’s Kenwood section. The president said the U.S. would be a strong partner. “I urge you to choose Chicago. I urge you to choose America,” he said. “And if you do, if we walk this path together, then I promise you this: The city of Chicago and the United States of America will make the world proud.” Applause His speech drew the first applause of the day. He and his wife shook hands with delegates as they left the room, and later met with them informally over coffee. “It made me miss home,” Obama said as he was walking out of the convention center. “Chicago could not have made a better presentation.” Obama landed roughly an hour before the scheduled start of the Chicago presentation. Traveling with him were Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood , Education Secretary Arne Duncan and Sen. Dick Durbin of Illinois. Chicago made the first of the four presentations by candidate cities. There will be 95 IOC members voting in the first round of balloting later today. The presentation opened with a video showing Chicago’s sights and sounds, with “Sweet Home Chicago” played in the background. Between speakers, brief videos were played highlighting the city and details of its bid. First Lady First lady Michelle Obama , who was born and raised not far from the potential locations for Olympic venues on Chicago’s South Side, gave an emotional appeal for her hometown. She talked about how her deceased father suffered from multiple sclerosis and how she used to sit on his lap watching Olympians compete, dreaming that she, too, could do something great. “But I never dreamed that the Olympic flame might one day light up lives in my neighborhood,” she said. “I am dreaming of an Olympic and Paralympic Games in Chicago that will light up lives in neighborhoods all across America and all across the world.” Daley’s Pledge Mayor Richard M. Daley told the IOC members that Chicago would be a good partner. “I pledge to you today that Chicago will deliver,” he said. “Because in Chicago, we don’t just talk about what we do, we do it.” After the presentation, Daley said Chicago wanted to highlight its diversity and use emotion to woo the voters. “Chicago is always about family, about generations of immigrants,” he said. “To me, that’s what Chicago is all about.” During a question-and-answer session with IOC voters, Obama pledged the “full force of the White House and State Department,” should Chicago win. The U.S. will have an Olympics office in the White House to help make sure athletes and visitors can get to the Games more easily, he said. The president said having the Games in Chicago would help promote racial equality and a “restoration of what the United States is all about.” The response was prompted after a question from IOC member Syed-Shahid Ali of Pakistan, who said visiting the U.S. can be “harrowing” for some from the outside. Republican Criticism In an e-mail sent to reporters today, the Republican National Committee criticized Obama’s trip, calling it an “Olympic gamble that only helps his Chicago fat cat friends.” Following the presentation, the president and first lady met with Danish royalty and Prime Minister Lars Loekke Rasmussen , the White House said. Before the Olympics decision is made, they are scheduled to board Air Force One for a return trip to Washington. White House press secretary Robert Gibbs was asked yesterday whether they would watch the result from the plane. “There are TV capabilities on the plane,” Gibbs told reporters. “I don’t know if where we will be traveling we will have that or not.” To contact the reporter on this story: John McCormick in Copenhagen at jmccormick16@bloomberg.net

Read the full article →

Most Babies Born Today in Rich Nations Will Live 100 Years, Scientists Say

October 1, 2009

By Kristen Hallam Oct. 2 (Bloomberg) — More than half of babies born today in rich nations will live for 100 years as earlier diagnoses and better treatment of illnesses such as heart disease extend lives, scientists estimate. Life expectancy increased by three decades or more over the 20th century in countries such as the U.S., U.K., France, Germany, Canada and Japan, and that trend will continue, according to a review published today in The Lancet medical journal. Without any further improvement in longevity, three- quarters of babies will mark their 75th birthdays, the Danish and German researchers wrote. “The linear increase in record life expectancy for more than 165 years does not suggest a looming limit to human lifespan,” wrote lead researcher Kaare Christensen, a professor at the University of Southern Denmark’s Danish Ageing Research Centre , in the review. Better health care for the elderly, particularly in the U.S., has extended lives by making illnesses like heart disease manageable over time and allowing earlier detection and intervention, the authors said. Public health campaigns against smoking have also aided longevity, they said. People are also living longer without becoming severely disabled, the scientists said, citing four health surveys in France. The aging of society has left nations struggling with how to fund programs for older citizens, the reviewers said. In Germany, the number of elderly for every 100 working-age people has risen from 16 in 1956 to 29 in 2006, and is forecast to reach 60 by 2056, the researchers said. Shorter Work Weeks Shortened work weeks over longer working lives may further extend longevity, they wrote. “If people in their 60s and early 70s worked much more than they do nowadays, then most people could work fewer hours per week than is currently common,” the researchers said. Such a redistribution of employment might help countries cope with the economic demands of an aging society, though it won’t be enough to meet those demands, they said. Christensen and colleagues from the University of Rostock and the Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, both in Germany, based their review on data available since 2004. The research was funded by a grant from the U.S. National Institutes of Health in Bethesda, Maryland. The Danish Ageing Research Centre gets support from the Velux Foundation , based in Switzerland. To contact the reporter on this story: Kristen Hallam in London at khallam@bloomberg.net

Read the full article →

Bernstein Says Financial Turmoil Showed Denmark’s Need for Safety of Euro

September 30, 2009

By Tasneem Brogger and Gelu Sulugiuc Sept. 30 (Bloomberg) — Danish Central Bank Governor Nils Bernstein said Denmark would have been hurt less by the financial crisis had it adopted the euro, calling the common European currency an “insurance policy” for the economy. “The crisis has shown us this is not just a political problem,” Bernstein, 66, said in an interview in Copenhagen on Sept. 28. “The crisis has shown that we can manage economically outside the euro, but it has also demonstrated that there are big advantages during a crisis to be inside and much more protected against turmoil and to have access to the euro system’s facilities.” Denmark pegged the krone to the euro in 1999, obliging the central bank to use policy to steer the currency. Nationalbanken raised the benchmark rate to 5.5 percent in October as policy makers defended the krone from a sell-off while the European Central Bank cut its main rate. That led to higher mortgage payments for Danish holders of adjustable-rate loans and increased the euro’s appeal among voters. “The big interest rate differential we had last year wouldn’t have been necessary had we been inside the euro zone,” Bernstein said. “We were under pressure.” Denmark would have had earlier access to dollars had it been a member of the common European currency, he said. In September last year, Nationalbanken was one of several central banks outside the euro zone to receive swap lines with the U.S. Federal Reserve. ‘Safe Harbor’ “We had to make an agreement with the Fed and a euro agreement with the ECB to help us through our problems, which demonstrates that in a storm it’s better to be in a safe harbor than alone at sea,” Bernstein said. Momentum in favor of switching to the common currency has ebbed as the crisis abated and the Danish central bank cut its lending rate to a record low of 1.25 percent on Sept. 24. After rising to a three-year high of 53.4 percent in November, Danish voter support for the euro fell to 48.9 percent of respondents, a poll commissioned by Danske Bank A/S showed this month. The government will probably break its pledge to hold a referendum on joining the euro this electoral term, which ends in 2011, as polls show dwindling support, government officials, who spoke on condition of anonymity because an official announcement has yet to be made, said this month. Economists have said if Danes rejected the euro for a third time, after votes in 1992 and 2000, the issue could be sidelined for at least 15 years. “My expectations are that there won’t be a referendum until we are sure to get a ‘yes’,” Bernstein said. “But the polls fluctuate a lot and are not very convincing. We’ve lost before, and you can’t try too often. It’s the government’s job to convince the voters.” Former Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen , who has said not having the euro “damages” Danish interests, handed the premiership to Lars Loekke Rasmussen in April. The former promised a vote by 2011; his successor has gone on the record to say setting a deadline is “impossible,” though he’s stopped short of officially canceling Fogh Rasmussen’s pledge. To contact the reporter on this story: Gelu Sulugiuc in Copenhagen at gsulugiuc@bloomberg.net

Read the full article →

Obama to Attend IOC Vote to Back Chicago Bid for 2016 Games, Jarrett Says

September 28, 2009

By John McCormick Sept. 28 (Bloomberg) — President Barack Obama will fly to Copenhagen this week to attend a vote on where the 2016 Summer Olympics will be held, said Valerie Jarrett , a senior adviser to the president. Obama will attend the Oct. 2 final presentation to the International Olympic Committee for the bid by his adopted hometown of Chicago, Jarrett said in an interview. “It strengthens our bid,” she said. “There is nothing like the president expressing what it means to him.” Chicago is competing against Madrid, Rio de Janeiro and Tokyo. Organizers of the U.S. bid had been lobbying the White House to have Obama make the final pitch, although the president had previously said he was too busy with the battle in Congress over health-care legislation. “President Obama and first lady Michelle Obama symbolize the hope, opportunity and inspiration that makes Chicago great, and we are honored to have two of our city’s most accomplished residents leading our delegation in Copenhagen,” Chicago Mayor Richard M. Daley said in a statement issued by the Chicago 2016 bid committee. Amy Brundage, a White House spokeswoman, said Obama’s absence from Washington will be brief and will not hurt efforts on his top domestic legislative priority. ‘Overall Progress’ “The president made a determination that being out of the country for a day will not negatively affect his efforts on health care or the overall progress of the legislation,” Brundage said. Patrick Ryan , chairman of Chicago’s bid and founder of insurance brokerage Aon Corp., said in a statement that the president’s presence will mean a great deal in Copenhagen. “There is no greater expression of the support our bid enjoys, from the highest levels of government and throughout our country, than to have President Obama join us in Copenhagen for the pinnacle moment in our bid,” Ryan said. Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva, King Juan Carlos of Spain, and Spanish Prime Minister Jose Luis Rodriguez are all also scheduled to be in Copenhagen. Tokyo is urging new Japanese Prime Minister Yukio Hatoyama to attend as well. The White House said the first lady will arrive in Copenhagen on Sept. 30, along with Jarrett, who has led the White House’s Olympics lobbying effort. The president will arrive just prior to Chicago’s presentation and will fly back to Washington the same day, the White House said. ‘Bring the World Together’ “President Obama and First Lady Michelle Obama will both make presentations to the IOC during Friday’s session,” the White House said in a statement. “They will discuss why Chicago is best to host the 2016 Summer Games, and how the United States is eager to bring the world together to celebrate the ideals of the Olympic movement.” While in Denmark, the president and first lady also will meet with Danish royalty and Prime Minister Lars Løkke Rasmussen, the White House said. A White House advance team was sent to Copenhagen last week to make security and other arrangements. White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs said on Sept. 24 that it would be a “very quick trip” if the president did go. Obama’s decision to make the trip will add star power to a U.S. delegation that already includes the first lady, television host Oprah Winfrey , U.S. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood and U.S. Education Secretary Arne Duncan . Chicago is bidding to bring the Summer Games back to the U.S. for the first time since Atlanta in 1996. To contact the reporter on this story: John McCormick in Chicago at jmccormick16@bloomberg.net

Read the full article →

China Cosco May Cancel Container-Vessel Orders After Second Straight Loss

August 27, 2009

By Wendy Leung Aug. 28 (Bloomberg) — China Cosco Holdings Co., Asia’s biggest shipping company by market value, may cancel container- vessel orders after posting a second straight loss on slumping world trade. The company, also the world’s largest operator of dry-bulk ships, reported a 4.59 billion yuan ($672 million) first-half net loss, compared with a restated 15.1 billion yuan profit a year earlier, in a Hong Kong stock exchange statement late yesterday. China Cosco’s container-shipping business, the nation’s biggest, had a 4.32 billion yuan operating loss as U.S. and European consumers pared spending on Asian-made goods, hammering rates. Its commodity-ship operations also posted a loss after sales tumbled 72 percent on overcapacity in the global fleet. Container lines “will still be under pressure in the second half as rates won’t cover costs,” said Johnson Leung , a Hong Kong-based analyst at Tufton Oceanic Ltd., the world’s largest shipping hedge-fund group. “The rate increase for the peak season may only be sustainable for a couple of months.” China Shipping Container Lines Co., the nation’s No. 2 cargo-box carrier, also said yesterday it will “tackle the crisis” through steps including accelerating the sale of obsolete vessels. The company posted a 3.42 billion yuan first- half loss. China Cosco will also pay 2 billion yuan to buy the outstanding 49 percent stake in a logistics venture from unit Cosco Pacific Ltd., it said. Volume Slump The shipping line’s first-half container volume tumbled 22 percent to 2.35 million twenty-foot equivalent units. Revenue dived 52 percent, led by a 70 percent plunge on Asia-Europe routes. The company also plans to delay new ships, terminate charters earlier and lease or sell vessels to pare growth, it said. China Cosco’s container fleet comprised 149 vessels as of June 30 with another 57 on order. Last month, it canceled a $299 million contract for eight dry-bulk ships and postponed deliveries of three others. The shipping line’s first-half dry-bulk volume fell 4.8 percent. Revenue plunged 72 percent to 11.1 billion yuan. The company operated 431 dry-bulk ships as of June 30, with another 44 on order. China Cosco, controlled by China Ocean Shipping (Group) Co., fell 3.1 percent to HK$10.14 in Hong Kong yesterday before the earnings announcement. It’s gained 88 percent this year, outperforming the benchmark Hang Seng Index’s 41 percent increase. The company, the world’s second-biggest shipping line by market value behind A.P. Moeller-Maersk A/S, won’t pay an interim dividend. All 10 of the world’s largest listed container-shipping companies have posted losses this year, triggering industrywide efforts to raise rates through coordinated increases and capacity cuts. China Cosco plans to “actively drive the market by promoting a raise in freight rates,” it said. Attempts to raise rates have stumbled amid excess capacity caused by plunging demand and the launch of new vessels ordered during a trade boom that ended last year. Maersk, the world’s largest container line, is ready to slash rates if rivals attempt to win market share by undercutting prices, Danish newspaper Dagbladet Borsen said earlier this week, citing Chief Executive Officer Nils Smedegaard Andersen . To contact the reporters on this story: Wendy Leung in Hong Kong at wleung12@bloomberg.net

Read the full article →

Scandinavian Private Equity Real Estate Fundraising

August 14, 2009

Four funds were raised by Scandinavian private equity real estate fund managers in 2008, receiving aggregate commitments of $1.3 billion. These all closed during the first half of the year. This represented a small decline on 2007 fundraising, when nine funds raised an aggregate $1.9 billion in equity commitments. To date in 2009, one Scandinavia focused fund has reached a final close. ICECAPITAL Housing Fund II closed with EUR 400 million in commitments. There are a further nine private equity real estate funds currently in the market that are managed by Scandinavian firms. Of these, three are focused on Scandinavia and are seeking aggregate commitments of $600 million, whilst six are focused elsewhere in Europe and are targeting $3.0 billion in commitments. The average size of funds raised by Scandinavian fund managers has increased in recent years. The average size has increased from $152 million in 2006 to $240 million in 2007 and $319 million in 2008. In the last 10 years, private equity firms based in Sweden have raised the most capital out of all the Scandinavian countries, having raised an aggregate $5.7 billion. Firms based in Finland have raised $3.4 billion, whilst Danish firms have raised $1.1 billion and Norwegian firms $300 million. The largest Scandinavian fund manager is the Stockholm-headquartered Aberdeen Property Investors, which has raised $3.2 billion for closed-end private equity real estate funds in the past 10 years. Helsinki-based CapMan Real Estate has raised $1.87 billion. Preqin’s Real Estate Online service has extensive information on real estate fund managers and fundraising on a global basis. Please click here for more information.

Read the full article →

NATO Refuses to Set Afghanistan Deadline, Says Alliance Will Beat Taliban

August 3, 2009

By James G.

Read the full article →

Resilient mortgage market cushions house price falls in Denmark

May 29, 2009

Danish residential property prices continue to decline in 2009. Single-family and terrace house prices fell on average by 10.8% (-12.4% in real terms) from a year earlier to end-Q1 2009, to DKK12,452 (EUR1,669) per square metre (sq. m.), according to the Association of Danish Mortgage Banks (Realkreditradet). This was the fifth consecutive quarter of such price falls.

Read the full article →