facebook

WSJ vs. GOP

December 21, 2011

The Wall Street Journal editorial page attacked congressional Republicans Wednesday for possibly losing the payroll tax cut standoff to President Barack Obama. The editorial begins : GOP Senate leader Mitch McConnell famously said a year ago that his main task in the 112th Congress was to make sure that President Obama would not be re-elected. Given how he and House Speaker John Boehner have handled the payroll tax debate, we wonder if they might end up re-electing the President before the 2012 campaign even begins in earnest. House Republicans killed a two-month extension of the payroll tax cut, unemployment benefits and a provision avoiding Medicare payment cuts to to doctors Tuesday by a 229-193 vote. The Senate voted Saturday by an 89-10 margin to extend all three for two months. All three provisions expire on Jan. 1. House Republicans want the Senate to return and negotiate over a compromise plan. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) said he won’t negotiate until the House approves the Senate’s package. The conservative editorial board wrote that the Republicans have “thoroughly botched the politics.” The board also added that Obama is in a “stronger re-election position today than he was a year ago.” If Congress does nothing, then the payroll tax paid by workers will rise from 4.2 percent to 6.2 percent, long-term unemployment benefits will expire and doctors will face a 27 percent cut in Medicare reimbursements on Jan. 1.

Read the full article →

State, Local Government Revenues Rose Signaling Hope For Recovery

December 21, 2011

Tax revenues of U.S. state and local governments rose in the third quarter, the U.S. Census said on Tuesday, marking the eighth straight quarter of growth and heralding the promise of continued economic recovery in areas where revenues collapsed during the recent recession. Revenues totaled $292 billion, rising 4.1 percent over the third quarter of 2010 to their highest third quarter level on record. They were primarily bolstered by a 10.9 percent surge in individual income taxes, which reached $66.7 billion in the third quarter. “State and local finances are gradually improving, but neither states nor localities are out of the woods yet,” said Gregory Daco, principal U.S. Economist at IHS Global Insight, in a note on the data. “The current fiscal year will be one of many challenges. State and local governments will have to manage still-high demand for public services while relying less on federal assistance, and without the boost to revenues from temporary tax increases and fees,” he added. Most states begin their fiscal year in July. State tax revenues alone rose 5.6 percent, to $178.2 billion, from the third quarter of 2010. States had experienced a slight time lag between the recession’s beginning in 2007 when the fall in employment, housing prices and consumption hit the wider economy and state revenue collection. Despite the onset of the recession, their revenues reached a record high in 2008 before the recession’s impact was felt and revenues plummeted. I n much the same way, states are only now beginning to register the recession’s end, officially in June 2009, and are eager for revenues to return to the 2008 peaks. And while revenues have been improving steadily, the European debt crisis, stock market declines, and other economic troubles on the national level have states worried revenue growth will not last. In Tennessee, individual income tax receipts plummeted 42.2 percent in the third quarter from the same period in 2010, the only state where those tax revenues dropped, Census data showed. On the other hand, they rose 139.6 percent in Hawaii and 81.8 percent in Illinois. All property taxes increased a much smaller 1 percent to $87.4 billion in the quarter. Those collected by local governments, $84.4 billion, were up 1.5 percent from the same quarter a year before. Sales tax revenues made much heartier gains, rising 3.3 percent to $73.3 billion, but corporate income taxes dropped for the first time in a year, by 2.9 percent to $9.1 billion. Sales tax collections dropped in six states and the District of Columbia. They rose the most, 40.8 percent, in North Dakota, and were up 25.1 percent in Nevada. Five states do not collect sales taxes. The Census data showed that other taxes, primarily those charged on oil and mineral extractions, surged 75.5 percent to $3.7 billion. Only a handful of states levy severance taxes, such as oil-rich Alaska, where they leapt more than 200 percent. At the start of the recession, state and local governments temporarily increased taxes and fees to tide them over. Those measures are ending now, just as the extraordinary assistance from the 2009 federal economic stimulus plan draws to a close. That has left fewer places to tap revenues, especially as states’ voters and leaders such as Virginia Governor Bob McDonnell slam the door on the possibility of future tax increases. The only tax increase on a state ballot in November, in Colorado, failed. Meanwhile, the U.S. Congress is fighting over any spending increases, which means that the federal government will likely send fewer dollars to the states, which are likewise cutting local aid. (Reporting By Lisa Lambert; Additional reporting by Lucia Mutikani; Editing by Theodore d’Afflisio) Copyright 2011 Thomson Reuters. Click for Restrictions .

Read the full article →

Immigrants Founded Half Of Top U.S. Startups, Study Finds

December 21, 2011

(Sarah McBride) – Immigrants founded or cofounded almost half of 50 top venture-backed companies in the United States, a new study shows, underscoring some of the high stakes in potential immigration reform. The venture capital community argues the study, completed by research group National Foundation for American Policy, proves the need to overhaul rules governing how entrepreneurs can immigrate to the United States to spur job development. “It’s a gamble whether an entrepreneur should stay or leave right now, and that’s not how the immigration system should work,” said Mark Heesen, president of the National Venture Capital Association, on a call with reporters. “What we need is legislation that helps these entrepreneurs from outside the United States.” Of the 50 top venture-backed companies, 23 had at least one immigrant founder, the study found. In addition, 37 of the 50 companies employed at least one immigrant in a key management position such as chief technology officer. Companies with immigrant founders include some of Silicon Valley’s hot start-ups, such as textbook-rental service Chegg, founded by Indian Aayush Phumbhra and Briton Osman Rashid; online craft marketplace Etsy, founded by Swiss Haim Schoppik; and Web publisher Glam Media, founded by Indians Samir Arora and Raj Narayan. The countries that supplied the most founders included India, Israel, Canada, Iran and New Zealand, the study found, and the immigrant-founded companies created an average of 150 jobs. The study looked at the top 50 venture-backed companies as measured by research firm VentureSource, based on factors such as company growth and the amount of capital raised. VentureSource considered only companies valued at less than $1 billion. Young companies and their backers say the rules are too cumbersome and encourage non-U.S. citizens to launch start-up businesses elsewhere, or bog down companies in red tape if they commit to basing in the United States. One obstacle to the loosening of immigration rules for entrepreneurs is a tendency in Congress to consider legal and illegal immigration jointly, Heesen said. Because illegal-immigration issues are so divisive, he said, overall immigration reform has bogged down. The NFAP identified bills pending in the House of Representatives and the Senate that would help through measures such as lowering the amount of capital an entrepreneur has to raise before being eligible for an immigrant visa. (Source: http://www.nfap.com/pdf/NFAPPolicyBriefImmigrantFoundersandKeyPersonnelinAmericasTopVentureFundedCompanies.pdf ) (Reporting by Sarah McBride; Editing by Steve Orlofsky) Copyright 2011 Thomson Reuters. Click for Restrictions .

Read the full article →

Hedge-Fund Titans Got Inside Political Tips

December 21, 2011

I’m surprised this Wall Street Journal story, detailing how hedge funds manage to obtain profitable inside information, hasn’t gotten more attention today. The whole story seems pretty explosive.

Read the full article →

Dan Solin: The Big Flaw in 401(k) Reform

December 21, 2011

Here is the harsh reality: 401(k) plans are a false crutch for employees. They simply don’t work, if you define “work” as providing funds that will permit retirement with dignity — if at all. According to Fidelity Investments , average balances in 401(k) plans as of March 31, 2011 were $74,900. Those 55 and older had saved $233,800 on average. Given increased life expectancy, it is understandable that another study found that 61 percent of those surveyed said they were more scared of outliving their assets than they were of dying. Things are not so grim for those who “service” the burgeoning 401(k) industry. These fees abound. It would take an actuary to figure them out. They include plan administration fees, investment fees and individual service fees. The big kahuna are the investment services fees which can include sales charges (also known as loads and or commissions) and management fees. The U.S. Department of Labor summarized these fees here . There has been a lot of focus on fees. Studies have shown that plans with lower fees typically have higher average account balances. The Department of Labor has issued a new rule to improve the transparency of fees and expenses to employees in 401(k) plans. This rule (Labor Regulation 408(b)2) goes into effect April 12, 2012 and requires plan providers to disclose all fees to employers. Employers will be required to demonstrate they have a process in place to evaluate these fees and disclose them to employees. While this is a good start, it will do little to increase average balances in 401(k) plans. The typical plan offers a mish-mash consisting primarily of actively managed mutual funds (where the fund manager attempts to beat a designated benchmark, like the S& P 500 index) with a few index funds and target date retirement funds tossed into the mix. Employees are left to put together a suitable risk adjusted portfolio. Many have no idea how to do so. Here’s what real reform would look like: Every plan should be required to have a minimum of five risk adjusted, globally diversified portfolios (ranging from conservative to aggressive), consisting solely of low management fee stock and bond index funds. Employees would take a short risk capacity survey and select the portfolio suitable for them; Investment advisers to 401(k) plans should be required to state in writing that they are “3(38) ERISA investment fiduciaries”, which means they can have no conflicts of interest. They would accept 100% of the liability for the selection and monitoring of the investment options in the plan. These advisers would be required to provide investment advice to all participants to be sure they have chosen a portfolio suitable for their investment objectives and capacity for risk. These simple reforms would radically improve the expected returns of plan participants. The underlying fallacy in current efforts at 401(k) plan reform is that employees are capable of making intelligent investment choices when presented with a dizzying array of mostly poor investment options. I recently spent time with a group of nurse anesthetists whose plan we advise. It never occurred to me to ask them to give me ten needles and five choices of anesthesia (some good and some dangerous) and let me handle their next patient. Why do we assume employees can be skilled investment advisers? We need reform that makes the process of making investment selections in 401(k) plans foolproof. Current reform just doesn’t cut it. Dan Solin is a senior vice president of Index Funds Advisors. He is the New York Times bestselling author of The Smartest Investment Book You’ll Ever Read, The Smartest 401(k) Book You’ll Ever Read, The Smartest Retirement Book You’ll Ever Read and The Smartest Portfolio You’ll Ever Own. His new book, The Smartest Money Book You’ll Ever Read, will be available December 27, 2011.The views set forth in this blog are the opinions of the author alone and may not represent the views of any firm or entity with whom he is affiliated. The data, information, and content on this blog are for information, education, and non-commercial purposes only. Returns from index funds do not represent the performance of any investment advisory firm. The information on this blog does not involve the rendering of personalized investment advice and is limited to the dissemination of opinions on investing. No reader should construe these opinions as an offer of advisory services. Readers who require investment advice should retain the services of a competent investment professional. The information on this blog is not an offer to buy or sell, or a solicitation of any offer to buy or sell any securities or class of securities mentioned herein. Furthermore, the information on this blog should not be construed as an offer of advisory services. Please note that the author does not recommend specific securities nor is he responsible for comments made by persons posting on this blog.

Read the full article →

Dr. Doom Of The 1970s: Euro Crisis Could Prompt U.S. Credit Crunch

December 18, 2011

Euro-zone bank failures could lead to a credit squeeze in the United States, hurting an already subpar U.S. economic recovery, warned the well-known Wall Street economist Henry Kaufman. A deterioration in the European financial system “could cause some of the American financial institutions to become more conservative and limit their own balance sheet expansion, a credit squeeze that would place a limit on the American economy,” Kaufman said in an interview with Reuters. “A failure in the euro-zone area, a malfunctioning of the euro, would have negative repercussions for the U.S. not just in terms of a slowdown in U.S. exports to Europe, but also because of linkage between American financial institutions and European institutions,” said Kaufman, who is president of the economic and financial consulting firm bearing his name. Kaufman earned the sobriquet Dr. Doom in the 1970s – long before Nouriel Roubini acquired the title in recent years. Like Roubini, Kaufman was prescient in his warnings about excessive debt in the financial system. These days, with markets focused on Europe’s excessive debt, he says severe spending cuts in southern Europe could send those countries into a downward spiral with no prospect of recovery. “Debtor countries need to expand their economies and austerity measures diminish those countries’ ability to grow and service their debt,” Kaufman said. Before establishing his eponymous firm in 1988, Kaufman spent 26 years at Salomon Brothers Inc. His prediction on August 17, 1982, that interest rates would fall sparked a stock market rally that helped kick off the 1980s bull market. This year, the stock market has been held back by worries about Europe, where rising borrowing costs signify concerns that the debt contagion that has hit smaller nations will engulf large nations and large banks. The fear is exposure to European banks will hurt U.S. banks as well. Big banks in Europe have sold large amounts of insurance in the form of financial instruments known as credit-default swaps to protect against the risk of countries defaulting on their sovereign debt, That has increased the number of parties that could incur losses if such defaults occur. “We don’t know the full depth of these links,” Kaufman said in an interview with Reuters. That makes the European financial situation “hazardous” despite the ongoing effort by European policymakers to gain time, he said. An expert on how credit flows through the economy, financial system and financial markets, Kaufman, who received the Foreign Policy Association’s Statesman Award – presented by former Federal Reserve Chairman Paul Volcker earlier this month – said Europe will probably need “a major overhaul of its institutional arrangements” to escape its financial quagmire. A combination of strategies will probably be needed to solve the euro-zone problem, he said. One would be to gain time for debtors to re-establish their economic capacity. The head of Europe’s bailout fund said on Friday around 600 billion euros ($782.82 billion) were available to fight Europe’s debt crisis, more than Italy’s and Spain’s combined funding needs for 2012. Another strategy would be to reduce the debt of borrowers like Greece, Portugal or Italy, a reduction to which creditors would have to agree. “That would require some private-sector institutions to take losses and/or that the debt of these marginal borrowers be transferred directly or indirectly to some official European institution such as the European Central Bank,” he said. Banks are resisting pressure to help indebted euro-zone countries by using cheap money lent by the European Central Bank to buy more sovereign bonds. “Since none of these alternatives are easy, the conclusion must be that risks in Europe remain high,” Kaufman said. DEBT STANDS IN THE WAY OF RECOVERY One huge obstacle in the path of more normal U.S. growth is the amount of non-financial debt relative to U.S. gross domestic product, Kaufman said. On the eve of the 2008 financial crisis, non-financial debt exceeded U.S. gross domestic product by $19 trillion, while 20 years earlier, non-financial debt exceeded U.S. GDP by just $4 trillion, he observed. “There are no easy ways to close that gap … to return to a path of more sustainable U.S. economic growth,” he said. Households have been reducing their debt. Federal Reserve data showed household debt service levels fell in the third quarter, continuing a pullback from a peak reached in the third quarter of 2007. Still, “total household indebtedness is still quite high by historical standards,” Kaufman said. Without the large borrowings of the U.S. government, the recession would have been deeper and the business recovery, subnormal as it is, would have been delayed, Kaufman said. While the growth of U.S. government debt will have to slow in coming years, it is “quite unlikely” the U.S. government will adopt “appropriate fiscal policies” soon, he said. “Near-term pressures are not strong enough to impose discipline, U.S. interest rates are historically low, and buyers of our debt are still easy to find,” he said. (Reporting By Ellen Freilich; Editing by David Gaffen and Jan Paschal) Copyright 2011 Thomson Reuters. Click for Restrictions .

Read the full article →

World’s Largest Bond Fund Sees Investors Leaving In ‘Steady Stream’

December 17, 2011

NEW YORK (Jennifer Ablan and Matthew Goldstein) – Bill Gross’s PIMCO Total Return Fund, the world’s largest bond fund, keeps shrinking as investors look to put their money with some of his competitors. In November, the mutual fund led by Gross saw about $500 million in outflows, bringing its cash outflow over the past 12 months to $10.3 billion, said Morningstar editorial director Kevin McDevitt. By contrast, November was a banner month for most other taxable bond funds, which took in nearly $10.2 billion in money as a group, according to Morningstar. Over a 12-month period, taxable bonds fund accumulated $105.8 billion in new money. An outflow of $10.3 billion might not seem too bad for a fund that still oversees $241 billion in assets, but it’s an indication that investors are losing some faith in Gross, whose fund has underperformed all year and in November once again missed out on a big move away from stocks and other risky assets and into bonds and Treasury notes. “The PIMCO Total Return fund has been seeing a steady stream of outflows,” McDevitt added. “Gross’s fund has underperformed this year and a lot of it goes back to his misplaced bet on Treasuries.” Pacific Investment Management Co., or PIMCO, did not immediately return calls or emails seeking comment. Based in Newport Beach, California, PIMCO oversees more than $1.35 trillion in assets. It came under heavy criticism earlier this year when Gross bet heavily against U.S. Treasuries, which have turned out to be one of the biggest outperformers of 2011. Gross, who is known as “the Bond King”, apologized to his investors in October for his poor performance, saying “I’m just having a bad year.” In a letter to investors, Gross wrote that he underestimated the contagion effect from the European debt crisis and U.S. deficit concerns. “As Europe’s crisis and the U.S. debt ceiling debacle turned developed economies towards a potential recession, the Total Return Fund had too little risk off and too much risk on,” said Gross, who also shares the title of co-chief investment officer at PIMCO with Mohamed El-Erian. The Total Return portfolio is up 3.48 percent so far this year, lagging his peer category which is up an average of 5.87 percent. Put another way, his fund ranks in the 90th percentile, or 163rd out of 181 funds in his category, said Jeff Tjornehoj, head of Lipper Americas Research. At the same time, the so-called risk-off trade has benefited other taxable-bond funds, which saw nearly $10.2 billion in inflows, of which $8.5 billion was collected in the conservative intermediate-term bond category. The DoubleLine Total Return Bond, which is run by one of Gross’s arch rivals Jeffrey Gundlach, was one of the primary beneficiaries of the risk-off trade in November with nearly $1 billion in inflows. DoubleLine now manages $21 billion, up from roughly $7 billion at the end of December 2010. Meanwhile, index-driven funds Vanguard Total Bond Market II Index and Vanguard Total Bond Market Index fared even better with nearly $2 billion in combined inflows. BETTING BIG ON HOUSING DEBT Gross’s latest move is another bold one. In September, he ramped up buying of mortgage-backed securities, albeit by using leverage, on the likelihood the Federal Reserve’s reinvestment program in those securities will boost prices significantly. Analysts says Gross is moving to recalibrate his fund in the expectation the U.S. Federal Reserve will seek to prop up the American housing market by buying mortgage securities. Last week, PIMCO said mortgage-backed securities now account for about 43 percent of the holdings of the PIMCO Total Return Fund, as of the end of November. By loading up on mortgage bonds, Gross is making a bet on higher-yielding securities. But in doing so, he is effectively extending the average duration of his fund’s investments, making them potentially more exposed to a rise in interest rates. For now, the performance of housing debt is still trailing Treasuries. Since June 30, the total return of mortgage-backed securities is roughly 3.15 percent — more than 200 basis points less than U.S. government bonds. (Reporting by Jennifer Ablan and Matthew Goldstein; Editing by Claudia Parsons and Martin Howell) (This Thursday story was corrected in paragraph 2 to change the amount of outflows from the PIMCO Total Return Fund over last 12 months to $10.3 billion from $17 billion, according to a revised calculation by Morningstar, which had erroneously calculated the figure and provided it to Reuters in an interview.) Copyright 2011 Thomson Reuters. Click for Restrictions .

Read the full article →

Who’s The Real Winner In Zynga’s IPO?

December 16, 2011

The big winner in Zynga’s IPO, the largest by an Internet company since Google went public , isn’t the shareholders or the employees or even the executives. It’s Facebook. Zynga, which pioneered a new class of social games, is the first company that has piggybacked Facebook with a multibillion-dollar initial public offering. Early on, Zynga co-founder and CEO Mark Pincus saw the potential for Facebook-connected games that were free, allowed friends to engage each other and could be played on any device with an Internet connection. He created applications powered by Facebook’s network and today oversees a company estimated to be worth $7 billion. “There hasn’t been another developer that has built a large business on Facebook’s platform and gone public in this way. It’s a big first for the Western social gaming world,” said Justin Smith, founder of research and data firm Inside Network. That means Zynga’s success is also Facebook’s, experts say. They note the gaming company’s coming-out party on Nasdaq validates Facebook’s platform as one on which companies can build their fortunes by developing a new breed of web services. The IPO also highlights the next chapter in Facebook’s trajectory: The social network has evolved beyond photo uploads and status updates to offer a robust ecosystem of music, movies, news and lifestyle offerings, all in one place and all connected by an online network of friends. Developers have made more than $2.5 billion creating apps for Apple’s iDevices, according to Apple . Google gave rise to a new generation of companies, such as Demand Media, that succeeded because Google’s search engine sent millions of users their way. Now, Facebook is spawning a new breed of companies that thrive because of the connection-driven, sharing-stimulated online world Facebook has created. Zynga’s rise shows that Facebook, like Google and Apple before it, can support an industry hitched to its platform and help carry web firms to the big leagues. Five years ago, Zynga didn’t exist. Today the company is worth more than Hyatt Hotels, Hasbro and JetBlue. “Zynga is the biggest proof positive that you can build a huge and successful company on Facebook’s platform,” said Josh Williams, president and chief science officer at Kontagent, a company that provides user analytics for app developers. “For Facebook, Zynga’s IPO is great.” Zynga went from startup to Internet success story on the back of Facebook’s enormous user base. By developing applications on Facebook, such as FarmVille and Mafia Wars, Zynga leveraged the social network’s reach to sign up new members, collect information about its players and let individuals play online games with real-life friends. Zynga declined to comment, citing the legally mandated quiet period before and after its IPO. Before Facebook changed its policies, Zynga expanded its own audience by aggressively marketing (or spamming, some say) its games through players’ profiles. The company now claims three of the top five most popular apps on Facebook and over 223 million active players, three times more than its closest rival , according to AppData. The lion’s share of Zynga’s revenues come from the sale of virtual goods through its games. Facebook users generate 94 percent of Zynga’s revenues, according to estimates by Strene Agee analyst Arvind Bhatia , and Zynga warned investors in its S-1 filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission, “We generate substantially all of our revenue and players through the Facebook platform and expect to continue to do so for the foreseeable future.” “You have to think that without Facebook users, there is no Zynga,” said Gartner analyst Brian Blau. “It’s a very intimate relationship. You could compare it to a parent and child, it’s so close.” Financial analysts warn that Zynga’s coziness with Facebook makes it vulnerable to the whims of the social networking giant and caution that any change in Facebook’s terms could put Zynga’s financial health at risk. Yet Facebook needs Zynga nearly as much as Zynga needs Facebook, others counter. “It’s a symbiotic relationship. It’s not parasitic,” said P.J. Mcnealy, a digital media consultant and founder of Digital World Research. “Facebook becomes stickier as more people play games, and a lot of that content is coming from Zynga.” Companies like Zynga have helped Facebook evolve, transforming it from the Internet equivalent of a mom-and-pop shop peddling sweets to a mega-mall offering movie theaters, arcades and boutiques that lure crowds to stay longer and spend more. Facebook apps encourage users spend more time on the social network, which in turn allows the site to serve up more ads. Apps also provide new sources of income: Facebook takes a 30 percent cut on all sales through Facebook Credits, a virtual currency that must be used for all purchases on the site, such as the tractors players buy in Zynga’s FarmVille. Williams of Kontagent estimates that Facebook has netted more than $300 million from Zynga sales, and SEC filings reveal that Facebook forged a deal with Zynga guaranteeing that it would send minimum numbers of users to Zynga games. “You can only spend so much time looking at people’s pictures,” said William. “Thanks to apps, people are coming back more frequently and spending more hours on the site, which means Facebook is able to generate more revenue via advertising,” he said. In turn, Zynga and other app developers can tap into Facebook’s population of more than 800 million users, as well as the social network’s payment system, marketing opportunities and viral potential. As Zynga’s trajectory suggests, the payouts can be huge. Among other advantages, Williams noted that Facebook enables app developers to target people based on their demographic information and to acquire users more cheaply than they could elsewhere. The Facebook Credits system also saves small companies the trouble of implementing their own payment solutions, Williams said. Zynga’s success in building social games on Facebook will open the floodgates, encouraging even more apps in industries such as media, education and health, experts predict. “Zynga has been the largest company to capitalize on Facebook. Everyone else pretty much used it for marketing purposes, and no one really leveraged Facebook for revenue quite the way Zynga has,” said Billy Pidgeon, an analyst at consulting company M2 Research. “They wrote the manual on how to do that, but now the competition is coming in.” Facebook has been making the hard sell to companies beyond the gaming sector, such as Nike and News Corp. “The app that’s able to set that expectation that everything’s social up-front, that’s the app that’s going to win because that’s the app that I’ll see my friends using,” Bret Taylor, Facebook’s chief technology officer, told developers at Facebook’s f8 conference in October . The number of Facebook apps from media companies has surged in recent months. Following Facebook’s f8, at which the company unveiled a “new class of social apps” that allow for “frictionless” sharing , the Washington Post , Hulu, Spotify and the Guardian have all released new and improved Facebook apps that broadcast every action a user takes on the app. “Facebook is clearly putting effort into providing opportunities for media companies to plug more deeply into Facebook,” said Smith of Inside Network. “They’re pushing forward into the media world, outside of purely gaming, to make Facebook an even more important platform for other types of media companies.” Smith also expects to see mobile versions of Facebook apps that are not only tailored to smaller screens but also take advantage of smartphone capabilities, such as location information, to deliver new experiences. In theory, a concert venue could build an app that lets users locate Facebook friends attending the same performance. Or parents might be able to use an app to map their children’s whereabouts and send messages through Facebook. Although Zynga and Facebook profit from one another, so far they aren’t evenly matched. There’s only one Facebook, and while Zynga has plans to launch its own gaming site that would operate independently of the social network, it’s still closely married to Mark Zuckerberg’s creation. On the other hand, there could, with time, be dozens of Zyngas. Facebook no doubt hopes that will happen. “Facebook needs to have a really active developer ecosystem. When you have one developer out there that’s much bigger than all the others, you have a problem,” said Blau, the Gartner analyst. “For Facebook to ensure they have a viable business, they have to attract lots of other developers. It’d be great if they had 10 Zyngas.”

Read the full article →

China Increases Control Over Microblogs

December 16, 2011

BEIJING — Beijing authorities on Friday ordered Internet microblogs to require users to register with their real names, a tightening of rules aimed at controlling China’s rapidly growing social networks. An announcement posted online said all microblog companies registered in the capital had to enforce real name registration within three months. The rules, jointly issued by the Beijing government, police and Internet management office, apparently apply to all 250 million users of the hugely popular Twitter-like service Weibo.com, regardless of location, because its operator, Chinese Web portal Sina Corp., is headquartered in Beijing. Sina rival Tencent Holdings is based in the southern city of Shenzhen. It wasn’t immediately clear whether the company’s microblog service would have to comply with the same rules. China had more than 485 million Internet users as of the end of June, the most of any country in the world. Government officials warned in October that tighter new guidelines for social media sites were coming. Officials said then they were concerned about people using the Internet to spread lies and rumors. But the government is also clearly worried about the use of Weibo and other sites to mobilize potentially destabilizing protest movements. The new rules explicitly forbid use of microblogging to “incite illegal assembly.” Public protests are illegal in China and are a concern for the Communist leadership. Microblogs helped mobilize 12,000 people in the northeastern city of Dalian to successfully demand the relocation of a petrochemical factory and served as an outlet for public anger after a crash on the showcase high-speed rail system in which at least 40 people died. They also have given a national platform to a handful of independent candidates who have run this year for local legislative councils. Mark Natkin, managing director of Marbridge Consulting, which is based in Beijing and specializes in China’s telecommunications and IT sectors, said announcing the rules in Beijing first could be a way of testing their impact in a limited area before expanding them to cover the rest of the country. He said the system would inevitably rein in China’s microblogs. “Having a real name system will make people much more cautious about what they post,” he said. China blocked Twitter and Facebook after they were instrumental in anti-government protests in Iran two years ago, and instead encouraged homegrown alternatives in the apparent belief that domestic companies would be more responsive to government demands. It remains to be seen whether China’s new rules could drive some people away from domestic services. Tech-savvy Chinese are still able to access Twitter and Facebook by using special software that circumvents the government’s firewall. “Real name registration is sadly predictable, but very hard to implement, or if implemented is futile anyway as users will just shift to other platforms,” said Duncan Clark, managing director of BDA China Ltd., a Beijing research firm.

Read the full article →

Banks Face Crisis Of Confidence, As Europe Falls Further

December 14, 2011

The crisis in Europe showed no sign of letting up on Wednesday, and analysts and observers warned of the potential for a sharp financial downturn overseas. Hours after the markets closed in Europe, the credit ratings agency Fitch Ratings downgraded five major European banks and banking groups: Credit Agricole in France, Rabobank Group in the Netherlands, Danske Bank in Denmark, OP Pohjola Group in Finland, and Banque Federative du Credit Mutuel in France. While U.S. banks were unscathed, they now face a possible crisis of confidence. Many dumped risky European debt and other assets earlier this year, but banks in the U.S. are still at risk in the face of a recession and credit crunch in Europe. In a report last month, Fitch called the outlook for U.S. banks “stable” at the end of the third quarter, but warned that the spread of debt problems in Europe would have “sizable” effect because of the connectivity of global banking firms. Earlier on Wednesday the euro plunged to below $1.30, an 11-month low; Italian government bond yields traded above 7 percent, the level widely considered unsustainable, and stock markets in the United States and Europe fell. The FTSE Eurofirst 300 fell 2.25 percent, the CAC 40 in France plunged 3.33 percent, the DAX fell 1.72 percent and the S&P 500 fell 1.13 percent. “Europe is on the cusp of a recession: one that will be mild at best,” said Michael Gregory, senior economist at BMO Capital Markets. For more than a year, U.S. banks have been reducing their direct exposure to Europe, particularly its most stressed countries — net exposure to bad debt in Portugal, Italy, Ireland, Greece and Spain by the six largest U.S. banks represented only 0.5 percent of total assets at the six largest U.S. banks, according to the Fitch report. However, banks have substantially more assets tied to France, Germany and the United Kingdom, according to this report. Banks do hedge their bets on Europe, buying insurance essentially against falling assets. Goldman Sachs reported in an earnings call in September that its exposure to Portugal, Italy, Ireland, Greece and Spain was net $2.5 billion after hedges, for example. However, whether or not those hedges will actually work in the event of a government default is an open question. Voluntary debt forgiveness, which has already happened in Greece, is not covered under these hedges, notes the Fitch report. No matter the direct amount of assets U.S. banks have in Europe, the risks of a 2008-style credit crunch loom in such an interconnected economy. “If we were to get a series of failures in Europe, [it would be] hard to avoid a seizing up of markets as everyone pulls back and avoids risk,” said Martin Baily, an economist at Brookings Institution and former chairman of the council of economic advisers under President Bill Clinton.

Read the full article →

Democrats Considering Dropping Key Demand In Payroll Tax Cut Fight

December 14, 2011

WASHINGTON — Democratic lawmakers are considering whether to jettison their demand for a millionaires’ surtax, which they had hoped to use to cover the cost of a Social Security payroll tax cut extension for millions of wage-earners, officials said Wednesday. No decisions had been made, the officials stressed. If party leaders go ahead, it would mark a concession to Republicans in the year-end standoff over the tax cut extension that President Barack Obama requested and leaders in both parties say they want. The officials declined to be identified by name because they were discussing legislative strategy. The disclosure came as Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid and other leading Democrats went to the White House to meet with Obama. The subject of that meeting was not announced. The developments occurred one day after the Republican-controlled House approved legislation to extend the payroll tax cut, renew jobless benefits for the long-term unemployed and head off a threatened 27 percent cut in payments to doctors who treat Medicare patients. Obama has threatened to veto the bill, in part because it also mandates the construction of an oil pipeline from Canada to Texas. However, Senate Democrats have been unable to advance an alternative measure, in large part because Republicans are almost unanimously opposed to higher taxes. In its most recent form, the Democratic plan would have slapped a 1.9 percent surtax on income over $1 million, raising an estimated $140 billion over a decade.

Read the full article →

Beverly Macy: Top 3 Reasons for Executive Social Media Training in 2012

December 14, 2011

True story: Recently, a large public company sent an email to over 20,000 employees asking them to “Like” the new corporate Facebook page. Over 5,000 employees respond almost immediately. Two weeks later, a different department of the same company sent an email with this warning: “No employee of our company is allowed to use Facebook.” Welcome to the confused state of social media in the corporation as we move into 2012. Most companies are either doing nothing to learn more about social media or they are like the example above — the right hand doesn’t know what the left hand is doing. Social media is not taken seriously and there is no strategy in place that maps social business back to core business objectives. Why? IBM conducted a study of over 2,000 companies and asked them about the top inhibitors to adopting social media. The study found that security, adoption, culture, and compliance are the key barriers companies are worried about. Understandable. And all the more reason to get educated and informed. Knowledge is power” has never held more meaning. Armed with the correct information and education, your company will be empowered in the globally connected world. It’s time your company has a comprehensive approach to social media. Your senior executives can cannot approve or collaborate on something they know little about. Top 3 reasons to train your executives in social media: 1. Sense of Urgency. Your senior teams should understand the fundamentals of social media and the implications of real-time communication as it relates to customer service and sales. Your legal and HR teams should be able to articulate the liability to the company and the responsibilities of the employee as it relates to social media. 2. Opportunity. Whether B2B or B2C, a solid social business approach can help you find new opportunities to attract and retain customers globally and increase the bottom line. Your managers need to be effective in reaching your target markets with participation over public social networks and platforms. You need to be in continuous improvement mode, not hesitating at the starting line. 3. Competition. The hunt for new customers has never been more fierce. Your competitors know how to reach your customers, stakeholders, and suppliers via social channels – do you? Understanding how to use Twitter and LinkedIn search tools for business and competitive intelligence is critical. Social media is an enterprise-wide endeavor and it begins with education. A coordinated, professional approach is required to ensure all employees and associates understand the parameters of engaging in social channels as it relates to the company; knowledge on internal and external practices; comprehending measurement and analysis of efforts to impact the bottom line. Schedule comprehensive training and education for your senior teams in Q1 2012. It may be the best thing you do all year. Beverly Macy is the CEO of Gravity Summit, LLC and the co-author of The Power of Real-Time Social Media Marketing . She also teaches Executive Global Marketing and Branding and Social Media Marketing for the UCLA Extension in Westwood, CA. Email her at beverlymacy@gmail.com .

Read the full article →

Europe Austerity Ruining Chance Of Recovery

December 14, 2011

(Carmel Crimmins and Gavin Jones) – Europe’s “no pain no gain” attitude to solving its sovereign crisis risks exacerbating the bloc’s problems, choking off the very growth needed to raise the money to pay down the debt. From Athens to Dublin, and almost everywhere in between, administrations are imposing wave after wave of spending cuts and tax increases to persuade investors they are serious about improving their public finances and persuade them to start buying euro zone sovereign debt again. The austerity zeal risks tipping the continent back into recession and a downward spiral of austerity as pitiful growth prospects undermine budgetary targets and ramp up debt burdens, meaning further austerity is required. “The expansionary fiscal contraction story says that you cut, you show you are serious about cutting and then the confidence fairy will come along and she will start pulling in private investment,” said Stephen Kinsella, professor of economics at the University of Limerick. “The expansionary fiscal contraction story is a lie. You don’t cut your way to growth.” With the crisis spreading like wildfire through the currency bloc’s core, pushing up borrowing costs to unsustainable levels, countries are relying more on blunt budget cuts, than time-consuming and difficult structural reforms, to get results. The upshot is ballooning dole queues, shuttered businesses and public services stretched to breaking point. On the streets of Athens and Dublin poverty has visibly increased with more and more homeless people huddling in doorways. In Spain, emergency wards have been shut and in Italy, retailers are struggling to get by. “Consumption has been falling pretty steadily since the winter of 2008. Normally in a crisis, it starts with menswear and goes to womenswear and children. This time, it’s hit them all at once,” said Attilio Lebole, head of Textura, a mid-range clothing wholesaler based in Florence. “Demand is falling, there’s no doubt about that. Only foreigners are still shopping.” Despite having an estimated budget deficit this year of 3.8 percent of GDP, below the European average of four percent, Italy has been piling on austerity since the summer, destroying its already poor growth prospects and then responding with still more austerity to make up for the weaker growth. Italy’s dismal growth prospects and an inability to pass growth-enhancing reforms have been the key reasons given by ratings agencies for downgrading the country, not deficit slippage. “Italy is paying a very high price for lending credibility to Germany’s push for greater fiscal discipline across the eurozone,” said Nicholas Spiro, head of Spiro Sovereign Strategy. TERRIFIED OF SPENDING In the pre-euro days, currency devaluation was the quick-fire route to getting overblown economies back on track. What’s needed now is “internal devaluation” to get wages and domestic prices down. But if everyone is cutting back where will the demand come from? Global growth was meant to be the secret ingredient that kept the Irish economy ticking over while it slashed household income — down by an estimated 16 percent so far and counting — but the spread of austerity measures across the euro zone has shrunk its growth prospects and forced Dublin to cut even harder. Held up as a role model for other indebted nations, the irony is that Ireland’s recovery story looks set to be tripped up as others follow suit. In Spain, the incoming government is hoping that changes to a labor laws, which would untie wages from inflation, as well as measures to aid new businesses would help spur growth despite painful cutbacks. But analysts are unconvinced and say inevitable austerity measures needed to make tough public deficit targets in 2012 will serve to trim growth even further. A Reuters poll on November 24 showed the economy not growing at all in 2012. Others like savings bank foundation FUNCAS predict the economy will contract 0.5 percent next year as a result of the impending austerity measures. “The deficit objectives are so tough that in the short-term it’s not going to allow the government room to stimulate the economy or create jobs. There is no fiscal margin to do so,” said Angel Laborda, head of research at FUNCAS. Across the euro zone, retailers are bracing themselves for yet another drop in Christmas cheer as sales taxes are hiked in Italy, Greece and Ireland. The Greek Commerce Confederation (ESEE) is predicting a 22 to 30 percent fall in retail sales, with per capita spending seen dropping to 288 euros from 410 last year and 550 euros in 2009. And the New Year isn’t looking much better. Last week’s European summit laid out plans for balanced budgets implying austerity budgets for years ahead for many European states. Hilary Behan has already closed three of her six children’s clothes stores in Ireland, cut her staff from 38 to 20 and asked her store managers to take pay cuts of between 10 and 15 percent. Sales are down by over a third since 2008. “It just keeps getting worse and that’s the worrying thing there is no sign of any recovery. Every time the government get a chance they remove any chance of there being any sort of a recovery,” she said. “It’s not even the amount of money that they are taking from people it’s the constant battering. People are terrified to spend.” (Additional reporting by Giulio Piovaccari in Rome, George Georgiopoulos in Athens and Nigel Davies in Madrid. Editing by Jeremy Gaunt.) Copyright 2011 Thomson Reuters. Click for Restrictions .

Read the full article →

How Stores Dazzle Shoppers Into Spending More

December 14, 2011

Going head-to-head with online retailers in a squeezed economy, stores like Walmart and Best Buy have focused on low prices and minimal frills. But there is another option: dazzle customers into spending more. In December, Macy’s flagship store in New York City transforms into a Christmas theme park. Glittering signage, jazzy piano soundtracks, pine tree fragrances and an army of elves at “Santaland” make it impossible to forget the time of year. “Believe,” the store’s bags remind shoppers. If the latest retail numbers are any indication, this year’s shoppers are a hard sell. Online or non-store retail sales increased 1.5 percent in November, while overall sales ticked up just 0.2 percent, the smallest jump during that period since 2008, the nadir of the recession, according to U.S. census data released Tuesday . While luxury retailers have always tried to wow clients with unique store experiences, now even middle-brow retailers have to work to get customers in the door. On a recent Saturday at the Short Hills Mall in New Jersey, Ann Taylor — known for outfitting middle-aged middle managers — offered complimentary champagne to shoppers. High-end jeweler Bulgari also offered bubbly. “The New Ann Taylor,” as its ads proclaim, also put DJs in 225 of its LOFT stores and 25 of its Ann Taylor stores for holiday sales events. “We look at [the holidays] as our peak season,” said Devon Stein, the director of Events for Scratch, the company that books DJs for Ann Taylor events. “[Having a DJ] brings traffic into stores and puts shoppers and employees in a good mood.” Even if shoppers don’t admit it — or know it consciously — they seem ready to pay for comfortable experiences. Department stores did a bit better than other types of retailers in November. Meanwhile, BestBuy, which barely decorates for the holidays and focused on high-profile Black Friday discounts in November, saw its same-store sales decline that month. In 2008, retailers slashed their marketing budgets, aiming to stay competitive by cutting costs. While budgets have not recovered overall, “smart retailers are spending, just as they expect their customers to spend,” said Donna Sturgess, president of Buyology, Inc., a New York-based branding firm. “In the past several years, stores have begun to turn their attention not just to merchandise but to the whole environment,” she said. SENSORY SPENDING Macy’s has worked hard to maintain its pre-recession image. In 2008, CEO Terry Lundgren told NPR’s Marketplace that despite the economy, the department store did not want to be known only for low prices and sales. “Shoppers are attracted to stores for their merchandise, but also for excitement and enjoyment of the experience. It’s been called the ‘theater of retail’ because the customer wants to be entertained, appreciated, or even surprised while she’s shopping,” said Holly Thomas, Macy’s vice president of media relations and cause marketing. With the most foot traffic of the whole year, the holidays are a time when stores can creatively sell in ways that sterile web graphics cannot. Macy’s works with DMX, a multi-sensory branding company, to create the holiday-themed sounds and smells — including pumpkin pie and pine cone scents that it disseminates in its stores. Branding experts maintain that these extra touches are good for business. “Smell enhances the customers’ moods and keeps them in stores longer,” said Jaime Kane, scent project manager at DMX. Shoppers interviewed at Macy’s flagship location expressed a more mixed view. Kimberley and Tim Kleczka of Villanova, Pa., come to tour New York City department stores every year to see the window displays. “Macy’s is classy,” said Kimberley Kleczka. “Color is important, so are smells.” Tim Kleczka added that he enjoys the live piano in Nordstrom, a feature that the company is retiring this year. But the Kleczkas insist that they don’t make any impulse buys on the trips just because a store is nice. “We know what we’re looking for and buy it where we want,” Kimberley said. Another couple, Jim Micallef and Kathy Soloway of Bayonne, N.J., also come to the Macy’s flagship store just to check out the scene. “You find what you want here, then you buy it on Amazon,” Micallef said matter-of-factly. On Dec. 10, one of the busiest retail shopping days, Amazon offered a cutthroat deal to shoppers like Micallef : 5 percent off any item whose barcode they scanned in a store using Amazon’s “price checker” app. Micallef, meanwhile, said he doesn’t even bother to check prices at Macy’s. “Everyone buys on the Internet now,” he said. “Even my kids make their lists on WhatIWantForXmas.com !” Still, the fact that the Macy’s flagship remains a tourist destination can’t hurt business — more traffic means more spending, even if shoppers set out with more frugal intentions. In November, Macy’s saw same-store sales increase 4.8 percent, beating many of its competitors. On Nov. 1, it announced a $400 million renovation of its flagship store. “Macy’s does Christmas well,” said Donna Sturgess. “The arches of red, the people bustling. Then the music hits you. It feels like Christmas. It feels like there’s no economic downturn.”

Read the full article →

Occupy Wall Street Jobs Expo Has Many Problems, Few Available Jobs

December 13, 2011

NEW YORK — On a bright, cold winter Monday in Zuccotti Park, a couple dozen of diehard Occupiers were milling about when two men in suits walked in with a folding table, a small entourage and six cardboard boxes labeled “Administrative/Clerical,” “Arts and Entertainment,” “Health care,” “Medical,” “Legal” and “Finance.” The men were brothers, John and Derek Tabacco, aged 43 and 41, respectively, and their plan was to hold an informal jobs expo. Their stated aim: to help unemployed Americans find work and hasten the end of the anti-banks movement by employing one protester at a time. They were not warmly received. While a handful of people did show up with resumes — less than 10 in the first two hours, by The Huffington Post’s estimation — the “jobs expo” called Occupy A Desk appeared to be primarily a publicity stunt. The Tabacco brothers claimed on Monday that eight different businesses were represented at the event — and that many more who weren’t present were offering positions. However, at the peak of the action, only four businessmen appeared to be actively reviewing resumes; one from a company that is accused of “operating as a pyramid scheme.” Derek Tabacco, who counts himself among the so-called “53 percent,” a conservative meme for taxpaying Americans, insisted that the event was not a protest or self-promotion. He called the Occupiers “dirty hippies,” but said “we have a lot of the same views.” “We should all be working together, trying to stimulate the economy,” he said, looking out at the gathering crowd of Occupiers. The brothers first made their anti-Occupy Wall Street debut a few days after the park was cleared last month, when protesters attempted to shut down the New York Stock Exchange. While police barricaded the narrow streets around Wall Street, demanding identification from employees who needed to get to work, the Tabacco brothers marched down Broadway, wearing suits and holding matching florescent green signs: “Get a Job” and “Occupy A Desk!” The feedback they got that morning — repeated shouts from protesters saying they couldn’t find work — inspired the day’s events, Derek Tabacco explained on Monday. After that, the brothers — who both have a history with reality television (Derek was on ” Millionaire Matchmaker ,” described as “a bigger-than-life sports fanatic with a lot to learn about the ladies”; John, on VH1′s “My Coolest Years”) — were deemed the “Heroes of Wall Street” by BusinessInsider.com and the “faces of the anti-Occupy movement” by Mediaite.com . They have both been guests on Fox Business News to discuss their anti-Occupy Wall Street views. The brothers’ entourage on Monday included a painter, three musicians, a handful of businessmen in pinstripe suits and a camera crew. “There’s a violinist playing,” Derek said emphatically, when asked if the event was a counter-protest, and pointed a few feet away to where a violinist wearing a patterned, brown woolen coat was performing. The brothers invited her, along with a painter working on a piece of an American flag, and two musicians from the band Screaming Broccoli. “Did you ever hear a violinist at a job fair?” he asked. According to a press release, the expo was to take place between noon and 4 p.m., when human resource representatives and small business owners would review resumes of people who dropped by and try to match them with one of about 50 job openings the Tabacco brothers said they were trying to help fill. The response from businesses, Derek Tabacco said, was very strong: Since sending out the release, the number of open jobs had shot up from 50 to 400, he said. He declined to go into detail about where most of these jobs were, or how exactly he would be able to help expo attendees get them — “networking,” he said. But by 12:45 p.m., the number of available jobs or businesses represented in the park was nearly irrelevant. Forty-five minutes into the event, only one of the businessmen maintained his post at a table spread with informational packets — the rest of Tabacco’s crew was huddled in a group off to the side, while Derek Tabacco, dressed in a pin striped wool suit, stood in the middle of a ring of Occupiers who angrily chanted, “Whose park? Our park! Whose park? Our Park!” “I share it with you, I played chess here my whole life,” Tabacco shouted back. A man darted forward and poured birdseed by the cardboard boxes intended for resumes, still mostly empty, and a nearby flock of pigeons flew over. “Who did that?” Tabacco shouted. Onlookers shrugged. The one businessman who did maintain his post, chatting with anyone who walked by, was Al Peteroy, a senior consultant with Ambit Energy, a Texas-based energy company. Last May, the company was hit with a billion dollar lawsuit accusing it of federal racketeering, fraud and unfair business practices. The lawsuit describes Ambit as “operating as a pyramid scheme which makes false and misleading statements that constitute deceptive acts or practices.” A lawyer for the company told The Huffington Post that the claims had “no basis in law or fact.” Although the jobs expo was growing more chaotic, Peteroy said he planned to stay put, looking for new recruits. “I’m going to stay,” he said, adding that several people had taken cards and fliers, but that no one had signed up yet. Peteroy, broad shouldered, hails from Staten Island, N.Y., where the Tabacco brothers also grew up. He was disappointed, he said, by the size of the crowd — he was expecting more than 1,000 people. “I’m presenting an opportunity to earn an income,” he said. “But I don’t think that people are actually looking for a job, they’re looking for an argument.” According to a video on the company’s website, working for Ambit is not free: marketing consultants must pay an enrollment fee of $429 and monthly payments of $24.95. The more people Peteroy recruits, or “sponsors,” as marketing consultants, the more money he earns. By 1 p.m., the boxes had accumulated a few resumes. But fliers distributed by Occupiers — featuring the career highlights of John Tabacco — outnumbered the seemingly-legitimate resumes. “Would you hire this man?” the top of the flier read. In the event’s press release, Tabacco is described as “a predominant expert in Securities Lending” and the founder and chief executive of Locatestock.com — “one of the first electronic securities lending portal [sic] that has modernized and simplified the Securities Finance Industry,” according to the company’s site. But as the protesters’ fliers indicated, Tabacco worked as a broker in New York in the ’90s and was barred from the securities industry after being sanctioned for misconduct in 1996. In the case file , investigators concluded, “We find that Respondent Tabacco’s actions in this matter were completely outrageous and that his contradictory statements were utterly disgraceful.” Tabacco dismissed the flier as slanderous and added that, “Any time you engage in public events to bring some a positive message there’s always going to be haters.” Henry James Ferry, an Occupier who runs a recently launched media outlet, The Other 99, approached the table where Michael Muscarello, the director of talent acquisitions at the staffing firm Intermedia Group, stood reviewing resumes. “Do you know that 70 percent of the people protesting have jobs?” Ferry asked, citing a survey of Occupy Wall Street members conducted by Hector R. Cordero-Guzman, Ph.D, of the School of Public Affairs at New York’s Baruch College. “Why is it that you think that people in Zuccotti Park should just go get a job?” Muscarello, wearing a white scarf over his suit and sunglasses pushed back on his forehead, avoided the question. “If you’re looking for a job, if it’s in your interest to find one, you can find it,” he told Ferry. Ferry pointed to McDonald’s day of hiring last April, when it announced plans to hire 50,000 workers and more than a million applied. “There’s a job shortage out there,” he said. “I’m looking for a guy who can do this,” Muscarello countered, holding up a sample resume of a Java developer. “You show me a guy who can do this and I can get him a job tomorrow.” According to the most recent release from the government , there were more than four unemployed people for every job in October, the 34th straight month with a ratio above 4-1. Nearby, a 63-year-old woman named Monica Rows who said she had been unemployed since 2009, put her resume in the “Administrative/Clerical” resume box, and then, for good measure, the other five boxes as well. A friend told her about the expo, she said, and she was surprised to learn it was in Zuccotti Park, where the Occupy protests were held. “I can do all of these fields, clerical, arts, medical,” she said. “If I don’t get a job, I’ll be out on the streets.” Standing off to the side, an Occupier named Paul Spitzer said he had invited the brothers to sit down and talk things out, away from the chaos of the park. Derek Tabacco said he thought that was a good idea. “Maybe we can sit down without yelling and find some common ground,” Spitzer said. “We need these kinds of debates. But here in Zuccotti, there is a lot of angst and upset people and then a guy that looks like Frank Sinatra” — he gestured at the brothers — “wearing a suit comes down here and says that they should just get a job? The communication gap is just huge.” When the expo ended, the Tabacco brothers made their way over to Fox News, where they sat for an interview on “Your World w/ Cavuto.” Neil Cavuto agreed with Derek and John that the day had been positive — except for what they characterized as the disruptive and ungrateful Occupiers themselves. “It kind of shows that their argument is disingenuous,” John told Cavuto. “They’re [in Zuccotti] because they can’t find a job, now that we’ve brought over 400 job opportunities to the park, not one occupier handed in a resume.” While many in the Occupy Wall Street movement would likely agree that a lack of jobs in the U.S. economy is a significant problem, those in the park on Monday seemed to disagree with the Tabacco brothers’ basic premise. They were not in the park because they couldn’t get a job, but because they wanted to protest the corrupt global financial system. “There’s a sarcasm at the heart of this thing,” said Matt Sky, an Occupier standing by the resume boxes, holding a sign that read, “You Deserve Better: Occupy.” “The movement isn’t about people who are whining that they don’t have a job, it’s about fundamentally changing a broken system.”

Read the full article →

The Food Companies That Spent The Most On Lobbyists This Year

December 13, 2011

A lot of the attention on the intersection between food and the U.S. legislature recently has focused on the impending revision of the Farm Bill . Thousands of jobs and the health of millions ride on the billions of dollars that will be doled out by the Farm Bill, so it’s an understandable target of interest. But the Farm Bill is far from the only piece of legislature that affects the food world. In fact, every year, food and beverage companies spend tens of millions of dollars trying to influence dozens of bills under consideration by the Senate and House of Representatives. These bills ranges from overhauls of elementary school nutrition program to tweaks to rules on patent protection — and all are subject to lobbying. The parties that spend the most trying to influence these bills are inevitably those that have the most to gain or lose as a result of the outcome. It’s no surprise, then, that PepsiCo spends lavishly to increase protection for patents, while French food services company Sodexo, which has has trouble with unions in the past, directs its attention to labor law. Such detailed information on lobbying would have been almost impossible to find a few decades ago. But thanks to the magic of the Internet, it’s now only a few clicks away. With the help of website OpenSecrets.org, we’ve assembled a list of the 10 food and beverage companies that have spent the most on lobbyists so far in 2011 . Click through below to find out who “won” the dubious honors.

Read the full article →

Employers Can’t Keep Momentum After Job Openings Hit Three-Year High

December 13, 2011

WASHINGTON — U.S. employers advertised slightly fewer jobs in October, a modest decline from a three-year high hit in the previous month. Companies and governments posted 3.3 million jobs in October, down from 3.4 million in September, the Labor Department said. October’s level was the second highest in the past three years. “Despite the retreat, the … report still indicates that the labor market is heading in the right direction,” Henry Mo, an economist at Credit Suisse, said in a note to clients. Even so, there is heavy competition for each job. Nearly 14 million people were unemployed in October, which means there was an average of 4.25 people out of work for each available opening. That’s worse than September’s ratio of 4.14. Job openings have rebounded from a decade low of 2.1 million in July 2009. But they are well below the 4.4 million advertised in December 2007, when the recession began. Nationwide, the job market improved in November. The unemployment rate fell to 8.6 percent from 9 percent, and employers added a net gain of 120,000 jobs. Still, half the drop in the unemployment rate occurred because many of those out of work stopped looking for jobs. When that happens, they are no longer counted in the unemployment rate. Layoffs also fell in October, the report showed, to the lowest level since January. More openings do not necessarily mean more jobs. Even though job openings rose 12 percent in the past year, hiring has increased only 4.5 percent, the Labor Department report shows. Some employers are likely pickier about who they hire than they have been in the past, economists say. They have more choices, since unemployment has been above 8 percent for nearly three years. In some high-skill industries, such as engineering or information technology, companies could be having trouble finding workers with the right skills. Some economists say companies aren’t offering high enough pay to attract workers they need or are unwilling to train applicants who aren’t a precise fit. Recent data shows the job market is improving a bit. In the past three months, job gains have averaged 143,000 per month. That’s an improvement compared to the average of 84,000 in the previous three months. And the number of people applying for unemployment benefits fell earlier this month to its lowest level in nine months, the Labor Department said last week. Firms are hiring more as the economy shows signs of improving. Factories are expanding, consumers are spending more and buying more cars, and Americans’ incomes rose by the most in October in seven months. Separately, the ManpowerGroup said Tuesday that more U.S. employers plan to hire in the first three months of 2012, according to its quarterly survey. Its net employment outlook rose to a seasonally adjusted 9 percent, from 7 percent in the current quarter. That’s the highest it’s been since 2008, when the recession took root. But that’s still far below the 20 percent that the index averaged from 2003 to 2007.

Read the full article →

Can You Guess This Future Tech Titan?

December 13, 2011

Before they were billionaires, most billionaires were just people who looked dorky in yearbook photos. Google co-founder Sergey Brin is no exception. The photo below ( courtesy of Snakkle ) was taken in 1990, during what would be Brin’s last year at Eleanor Roosevelt High School. As reported in Moment Magazine, Brin, who was born in Russia, went straight to the University of Maryland after his junior year, where he studied computer science and mathematics. He later enrolled at Stanford where he is currently on leave from his PhD studies, writes Business Week. It was during his doctoral studies at Stanford that Brin met Larry Page. As part of a research project, the two created a search engine that listed results in order of popularity. They named it Google, which is the common spelling of googol, a math term for the number one followed by 100 zeros. The huge number reflected their mission to organize everything on the web, reports Biography.com. Brin and Page would go on to officially launch Google Inc. in 1998. Today, Google is the number-one search engine in the United States, where it commands over 65 percent of the search market share, according to a recent report by comScore. And the geeky kid in that picture? He’s worth $16.7 billion. For more great photos of tech titans before they were billionaires, click over to Snakkle. PHOTO:

Read the full article →

Verizon ‘Emergency’ Text Alert Causes Panic In New Jersey

December 13, 2011

NEWARK, N.J. — Not quite the “War Of The Worlds” broadcast of a Martian invasion in New Jersey, a Verizon “emergency” alert Monday that the company texted to its wireless customers still jangled some nerves and triggered hundreds of calls from concerned residents to local and state offices. The company sent the alert to customers in Middlesex, Monmouth and Ocean counties, warning of a “civil emergency” and telling people to “take shelter now.” Trouble was, the message was meant to be a test but it wasn’t labeled as such, Verizon later admitted. Within about 90 minutes, the state homeland security and emergency management offices posted on Twitter that no emergency existed, but by then people had called a variety of local, county and state agencies to express their concerns. In Monmouth County, the number of calls to the county 911 call center doubled between noon and 1 p.m. to more than 170, compared to the same time last week, Cynthia Scott, a county sheriff’s department spokeswoman, said. “It was more concern than panic,” Scott said. “We had people calling who had a lot of questions.” New Jersey State Police also fielded calls, as did numerous public offices in Ocean County. “It seemed like calls went to any agency that had a listed phone number,” said Lt. Keith Klements, division commander for the county sheriff’s office. The reaction wasn’t as extreme as the panic touched off by Orson Welles’ 1938 “War Of The Worlds” radio broadcast of a fake Martian invasion in Grovers Mill, N.J. Many people believed the broadcast was a real emergency announcement. But for a short while Monday, the alert started a chain reaction across a wide swath of central New Jersey. “We were getting reports from individuals but not from any of our people out in the field,” Klements said. “And no one was saying it was coming from a specific source. But we have to take it seriously, so we immediately checked with the state.” A spokesman for the state Office of Homeland Security and Preparedness didn’t immediately return a phone message. In an email, a Verizon spokesman said the company apologized for any inconvenience or concern that the message caused. The company didn’t say why the message was sent without being labeled as a test or whether Monday’s incident was the first time such a mistake had occurred.

Read the full article →

Janet Tavakoli: Wealthy Patriots Wage Class War

December 12, 2011

A strange thing happened in Chicago on Thursday, December 8. An audience of well-heeled professionals, a mixture of Democrats and Republicans, packed a room at the Drake Hotel to hear Robert Shiller, a Yale professor, give a presentation on the housing market. A few members of the audience were in the top 1%, and the balance of the audience was probably in the top 2%-5%. At the end of the presentation, there was a bi-partisan revolt. The Chicago Mercantile Exchange (CME) and the Chicago Council on Global Affairs (CCGA) jointly sponsored the presentation. I’m a donor to CCGA’s president’s circle. Professor Shiller, deemed one of the country’s foremost housing authorities, proposed a futures index for hedging and a new type of mortgage loan product along with some historical filler. In the context of our recent housing debacle, he never once uttered the word “fraud.” Fraud “Blind Spot” Shiller’s speech was 2 ½ years after I appeared on C-Span talking about the many aspects of widespread interconnected mortgage fraud that damaged the global financial markets. I summarized fraud’s significant role in the 2008 financial crisis in a book called Dear Mr. Buffett . Shiller’s speech was months after Congressional investigations showed how Wall Street firms provided financing for fraudulent loan activity of a number of different loan originators by creating fraudulent securitizations. His speech was also months after widespread reports of robo-signing of affidavits and other types of foreclosure fraud. Banks showed up in court with fraudulent documents, which is fraud on the courts. The Yale professor’s speech was just four days after 60 Minutes blew open widespread loan origination fraud at Countrywide (video below). The firm created fraudulent documents. Separately it was reported that in Countrywide’s Chicago office, 90% of loan applications were altered and income was sometimes inflated by Countrywide employees, not by borrowers. Countrywide settled a well-publicized fraud lawsuit for $8.3 billion with several states including Illinois. Shiller’s talk was the day after former Illinois Governor Rod Blagojevich was sentenced to 14 years in prison after his corruption conviction. Shiller spoke on the same day that Jon Corzine, former CEO of bankrupt firm MF Global (former Democratic Governor of New Jersey, former Democratic Senator from New Jersey and former CEO of Goldman Sachs), testified before Congress that he had no intention to break the rules but he just doesn’t know what happened to an estimated $600 million to $1.2 billion of customers’ assets. Customers’ money disappeared from segregated accounts that should have been intact but were not. See also: ” Jon Corzine Dodges the Fraud Question ,” Huffington Post , December 9, 2011. Audience Calls for Integrity Michael Moskow, current vice-chairman and senior fellow on the global economy at CCGA and former head of the Chicago Federal Reserve, stood at the podium as Robert Shiller took questions from an upset audience. One attendee noted in an email to me that questioners were professionals, “not the Occupy Wall Street crowd who were accused of inciting ‘class warfare’ at the podium.” During the brief Q&A two men, one a former long-term Wall Street professional, asked questions about how we move forward when there is so little confidence. They cited the lack of integrity in the global financial markets. After that, I asked how one creates a futures index (as Shiller proposed) in which one can have confidence without acknowledging the existence of fraud and vigorously prosecuting fraud. There was fraud by loan originators, fraudulent securitizations, and even fraud in the residential mortgage backed securities (RMBS) that backed a different hedging instrument, the ABX index. The first time the word “fraud” was uttered that evening was when I posed my question. Shiller himself never used “fraud.” The most he would say in his so-called response was “some people aren’t very nice.” Really? It sounded rehearsed, and it struck most people in the audience as a shameful cop-out. If this is what economists are teaching students at universities, students should demand a refund of their tuition. Kindergarten children are given better warnings about strangers with candy. “Countrywide Broke the Law. Homeowners Did Not.” Even worse Shiller, intentionally or otherwise, distorted my meaning. He claimed borrowers inflated income, without citing a source. Some of that occurred, but that wasn’t what I referred to in my question. I corrected Shiller. I had clearly referred to instances where Countrywide altered documents and put in higher income amounts so that the mortgage loans would be approved for people that could not afford them. [Illinois Attorney General Lisa Madigan stated: "Countrywide broke the law. Homeowners did not."] Moreover, Shiller completely dodged the issue of fraudulent securitizations and foreclosure fraud. CCGA and Academia Need to Get Their Crimes Straight As if in a continuation of his answer to my question, Shiller mentioned he had spoken with a cab driver (apparently the source of all man-on-the-street information for academics) and the cab driver had no savings, only debt. Robert Shiller and Michael Moscow, the retired head of the Chicago Fed, appeared smug to me about this anonymous struggling working man’s plight. They seemed to be promulgating what Elizabeth Warren calls the ” myth of the immoral debtor .” Yet being in debt or even going bankrupt is not a crime in the United States. Loan originators’ submission of fraudulent documents is a crime. Securities fraud is a crime. Foreclosure fraud is a crime. Afterwards, several people came to me and to the other questioners. Much of the audience complained to CCGA’s conference organizers. All were disappointed in Professor Shiller. A male CPA in the audience later contacted me via my website and wrote that he was glad I had put the question to Shiller: “though I have a great deal of respect for him, I was disappointed in his ‘response’ (if you could call it that).” One woman who earned a Ph.D. in history found Shiller’s response to me “incoherent:” I was with my husband, brother, and his wife. I chatted with the stranger next to me and at least two people escaping at the same time [leaving after the speech]. No one could believe what a huge “fail” the evening had been…the failure of our political and expert classes to address the core issues…have alienated even those working in the financial industry–right up into the rung below the top of the food chain…this feels like the Ancien Régime’s last days. Class Warfare Alumni of the Federal Reserve, corrupt politicians, and willfully blind academics would be correct to say that evening was a case of “class warfare.” Well-heeled U.S. patriots declared war on the lack of class demonstrated by their financial peers. “Prosecuting Wall Street” – CBS’s 60 Minutes , December 4, 2011

Read the full article →

Fired RIM Execs ‘Chewed Through Restraints’ In Flight

December 10, 2011

New details are emerging about the rowdy behaviour of two Research In Motion executives who were fired for disrupting a transcontinental flight — including that they managed to chew their way out of restraints and wound up being subdued by other passengers until the plane landed. George Campbell, 45, and Paul Alexander Wilson, 38, each pleaded guilty to mischief for disrupting a Nov. 30 flight from Toronto to Beijing. The plane landed instead in Vancouver, where a court later ordered them to pay $72,000 in restitution. They also received suspended sentences and were placed on parole for a year. RIM fired both men after investigating what happened, but little information has been made public about what was so disruptive about their behaviour. However, court documents obtained by CBC News paint a very chaotic picture. The pair seemed heavily intoxicated from the start of the flight, according to one passenger. They drank, passed out, and woke up to continue consuming alcohol and yelling at one another. Campbell was described as a “rowdy and abusive” passenger who at one point warned that he would “off people when they left the plane,” according to the Crown prosecutor. One of the men also “assaulted a flight attendant and threatened to punch another,” the prosecution said in court. Crew members tried repeatedly to subdue the pair, but they kept struggling to get free, “verbally abusing” people on board and eventually “chewed their way through their restraints.” Diverted to closer airport As the situation escalated, the pilots decided to divert the plane to Anchorage. But the situation become so dire that they opted for the Vancouver airport, which was closer. During the final 80 minutes of the flight, “several flight attendants and a couple of passengers” restrained the two men and the crew initiated a “lockdown situation” so that no one was allowed to leave their seats. The prosecutor in the case called Campbell and Wilson’s conduct “way over the top.” “The repercussions for the company as well as every single person on the plane, both financially and perhaps even emotionally, are going to be huge.” Air Canada pegged its losses for diverting the flight at nearly $200,000 and RIM issued a statement saying that the conduct did not fit with the company’s “standards of business behaviour.” The two men were on a week-long business trip for the BlackBerry maker, but they were arrested after the flight landed in Vancouver. Both men live near Waterloo, Ont., where RIM is headquartered. Campbell refused to comment on the incident when reached by phone on Friday. Air Canada issued a statement but would not answer questions about the case.

Read the full article →

U.S. Trade Gap Narrowest In Months, As Imports From China Hit Record High

December 9, 2011

The U.S. trade deficit narrowed in October to its lowest in 10 months, but imports from China hit a record high, a government report showed on Friday. The trade gap totaled $43.5 billion, in line with a consensus estimate from analysts before the report. However, the Commerce Department revised its estimate of the September trade deficit to $44.2 billion from $43.1 billion. As a result, the October trade gap narrowed 1.6 percent from September, instead of widening, as most analysts expected. Both U.S. imports and exports declined in October, in a possible sign of weakening demand in the United States and abroad. However, a smaller trade deficit is positive for fourth-quarter economic growth, since it suggests more domestic demand is being met by U.S. production. Also, both imports and exports of capital goods set records in October, suggesting businesses are gearing up operations. U.S. stock index futures rose on Friday after European Union leaders agreed on measures that partially addresses the region’s crippling sovereign debt crisis. The euro rose against the dollar, while U.S. government debt yields rose. U.S. exports to the 27-nation EU rose 1.0 percent in October to $23.4 billion, while imports from the community increased 6.3 percent to $31.4 billion. “Exports to Europe are bound to weaken substantially, while imports will pick up steam as U.S. companies rebuild inventory after the unexpected decline in the third quarter,” said Ian Shepherdson, chief U.S. economist at High Frequency Economics, Valhalla, New York. Overall U.S. imports fell 1.0 percent to $222.6 billion, led by a $3.6 billion drop in industrial supplies and materials. The average price for imported oil fell for a fifth consecutive month to $98.84 per barrel, from its May peak of $108.70. The drop in the overall trade deficit “will prove temporary, because oil prices have risen significantly since October,” Shepherdson said. Despite the overall import decline, imports of capital goods and food, feeds and beverages increased to records in October. Imports from China rose to a record $37.8 billion and imports from Japan increased to $12.3 billion, the highest since April 2008. U.S. exports fell 0.8 percent to $179.2 billion, led by a $1.3 billion drop in industrial supplies and materials. The biggest monthly decline in that category was for non-monetary gold, which tumbled 25 percent to $3.5 billion. However, for the first 10 months of 2011, non-monetary gold exports totaled $27.8 billion, compared to $14.8 billion in the same period last year. U.S. exports to China increased to $9.7 billion, the highest since December. The U.S. trade gap with China was unchanged in October at $28.1 billion, but remained on track to surpass the annual record of about $272 billion set in 2010. (Editing by Neil Stempleman) Copyright 2011 Thomson Reuters. Click for Restrictions .

Read the full article →

Mayor Bloomberg Defends NYPD’s Handling Of Press During Raid

December 9, 2011

Mayor Bloomberg is still defending the NYPD’s raid on Occupy Wall Street in November. In two separate incidents this week, the Mayor addressed criticism from journalists who say they were “roughed up” and blocked from covering the raid, forcibly enforcing a media blackout on police activities. During his weekly radio appearance on Friday morning, Bloomberg insisted: We didn’t keep anybody from reporting, you just had to stand to the side. You don’t have a right as a press person to stand in the way just in the interest of getting the story…(regarding the clearing in general) the police show amazing restraint. This is the greatest police department in the world. The number of times police fire their weapons here is so much less than any other police department. Following the raid, the Society of Professional Journalists condemned the city’s actions and went on to say that the Mayor’s efforts insinuated what “would seem to be a strategic decision to cloak potentially volatile police activity from the public.” Earlier this week, congressman Jerrold Nadler called for an investigation into the NYPD’s conduct during the highly criticized raid and cited the especially disconcerting accusations of blocking journalists from properly reporting the events that ensued. On Thursday, Mayor Bloomberg took a rather bitter shot at Nadler and dismissed any need for an investigation. He told reporters at an appearance in Brooklyn , “If (Nadler) would spend more time getting us homeland security money, maybe he’d make the streets safer.” Nadler responded to the scathing remarks: It is precisely my job, as the ranking member on the House Judiciary’s Constitution Subcommittee, to ensure that the constitutional rights of all Americans are respected…Perhaps the mayor should review his own past comments lauding my success in securing needed federal funds for our city — from the $20 billion post-9/11 monies to the Zadroga Act to critical transportation funding — before spewing nonsense and so wildly contradicting himself.

Read the full article →

Unemployment Extension: ‘What Are They Waiting On?’

December 8, 2011

Kim Bullock of Las Vegas, Nev., said she lost her job with a telecom company almost exactly one year ago after her employer went bankrupt. Now she’s worried her unemployment insurance will run out before she finds a new job. Bullock said her yearlong search for work has resulted in several interviews, but no offers. “It’s just crazy because it seems like you have to put in 50 or 60 resumes just to get one callback, and then you’re competing with hundreds of other applicants,” Bullock said. She’s one of 6 million whose federal unemployment compensation would be cut short next year if Congress doesn’t reauthorize the benefits. And Bullock is one of several dozen jobless who’ve written HuffPost in the past week to say they are anxiously watching lawmakers for signs of a deal. Unfortunately for those people, instead of an agreement, on Thursday it seemed Congress was headed for a holiday showdown. While Democrats want a renewal of the benefits without strings attached, House Republicans are crafting a proposal that will reauthorize federal benefits programs and simultaneously slash benefits. Rep. Sander Levin (D-Mich.), the top Democrat on the House committee that oversees jobless benefits, sharply criticized the nascent proposal. “While we don’t have all the details, in this case the devil is made plain in the general outlines of the Republican proposal,” Levin said in a statement. “The plan Republicans presented this morning would slash federal unemployment insurance by more than half, cutting by 40 weeks Americans’ eligibility for assistance — even as we continue to emerge from the worst recession in 80 years. Also very concerning are indications that Republicans may propose undermining access to regular state unemployment benefits in the future.” Spokesmen for key Republicans in the House declined to provide details to HuffPost, but CNN reported the benefits would be part of a package that includes both a continuation of a payroll tax cut that has provided an average of $1,000 for every working American this year and a so-called “doc fix” to prevent a 27 percent pay cut to doctors who treat Medicare patients. The measure would be paid for with a federal salary freeze, and it would also speed construction of the Keyston XL pipeline — provisions Democrats oppose. The GOP’s plan would shorten the maximum duration workers can receive federal unemployment benefits from 73 weeks to 33 weeks, CNN reported. Federal jobless benefits kick in for people who don’t find work before running out of state aid, which typically lasts 26 weeks. Part of that reduction presumably would come from allowing the federal “Extended Benefits” program — which supplies the final 20 weeks of aid for workers in states with high unemployment rates — to phase out in 2012, which will happen anyway unless Congress proactively changes federal law to allow states to remain eligible. The Republican plan could achieve further reductions by incorporating legislation passed by a House committee earlier this year that would allow states to redirect federal jobless funds from benefits to paying down state debt to the federal government. Also, according to reports, the GOP bill would allow states to drug test the jobless. Rep. Jack Kingston (R-Ga.) introduced standalone legislation to do just that , though evidence of a drug epidemic among the jobless is hard to find. Most jobless would be eligible for more weeks of benefits under the GOP proposal than with no bill at all, though it was unclear how the new scheme would treat workers who’ve already used up a portion of their federal compensation. Kim Bullock said she’s received $398 per week since she lost her billing job with the telecom company last December. She said she’s got four kids whose ages range from five to 16, and that if she can’t find work before running out of unemployment, another family member will have to absorb her household. She worries she’d have to transfer her kids to a new school system. Already, she said, she’s holding back on even a small amount of Christmas shopping because of the uncertainty. “If I lose my unemployment there’s no way I’ll be able to make it,” she said. “What are they waiting on? Why do we have to wait in distress?”

Read the full article →

Uh-Oh! Huge Yahoo Partner Reportedly Wants Out

December 8, 2011

By Stephen Aldred and Prakash Chakravarti HONG KONG (Reuters) – Alibaba Group is seeking up to $4 billion in debt financing, sources said on Thursday, in a deal expected to help the Chinese e-commerce giant buy back a 40 percent stake in the company owned by Yahoo Inc. As Alibaba Group is private, there is no public figure on what Yahoo’s stake is worth, though some analysts say its worth at least $9 billion. Sources close to the matter said Rothschild, which is acting as debt adviser to Alibaba, had sent out term sheets to banks requesting underwritten proposals for the debt financing. The tenor of the debt is expected to be up to three years. Reuters was unable to obtain a copy of the term sheets. Alibaba Group, founded by billionaire entrepreneur and former English teacher Jack Ma, declined to comment. Alibaba, which counts a hugely popular business-to-business platform among its services, has long signalled its intention to buy back the Yahoo stake. Ma’s feud with Yahoo and his plans for the stake gained renewed attention lately with Yahoo the subject of takeover interest. Blackstone Group and Bain Capital are preparing a bid for all of Yahoo Inc, Reuters reported earlier this month, with Alibaba among its partners for the roughly $25 billion deal. Japan’s Softbank Corp is also part of that consortium. A source familiar with the matter cautioned on Thursday that the entire situation between the consortium and Yahoo remains fluid, and that no final decision has been made on any move that Alibaba or the other corporates plan to make. For the Alibaba debt financing, banks have been asked to provide underwritten commitments of $1 billion with an expected final hold of $400 million, according to one of the sources on Thursday. In November, Yunfeng Capital — co-founded by Alibaba’s Ma — Silver Lake and other investors completed the purchase of a 5 percent stake in Alibaba Group worth $1.6 billion. Alibaba, as a parent company, holds a 73.12 percent stake in Hong Kong listed Alibaba.com Ltd. A Rothschild representative was not immediately available for comment. (Reporting By Stephen Aldred and Prakash Chakravarti; Additional reporting by Lee Chyen Yee; Editing by Michael Flaherty and Chris Lewis)

Read the full article →

Naomi Klein: Best of TEDTalks 2011, #13: Addicted to Risk

December 8, 2011

As a culture we have been far too willing to gamble with things that are precious and irreplaceable.

Read the full article →

Meltdown

December 7, 2011

CAPE CORAL, Fla. — They sent her off with a lavish retirement party — dinner and drinks at a local yacht club, overlooking the inky waters of the Caloosahatchee River. They thanked her for her more than two decades of service in the office of a local real estate company and they wished her well. She was 63 years old and looking forward to the rewards of a lifetime of work, moderate living and diligent savings. She had stashed away nearly $400,000 in her retirement savings account, a sum that seemed sufficient to produce the income needed to make the payments on her modest home in this community alongside the Gulf of Mexico. She envisioned occasional vacations, entertaining friends on her patio, and seeing a show every now and again. But 10 years later, she is sitting inside the Cape Coral United Way house, amid hungry people waiting to pick up groceries at a food bank. She is about to see a career counselor, hoping for insights on how a woman might reenter the work force at age 73 with minimal computer skills, a rusty resume and a local unemployment rate above 11 percent. The stock market crash that accompanied the financial crisis of 2008 wiped out half her retirement account. She is current on her mortgage, but only because her son has been making the payments. She worries that she might yet slide into the weeds of foreclosure. Eileen — who asked that her last name be withheld, citing embarrassment — could pass for any retiree you might encounter on a cruise ship or at the Grand Canyon. She wears a crisp white blouse over Bermuda shorts and sandals. Her silver hair is cut short and neat. Yet here she is among the homeless and near-homeless, her gaze steely, as a clerk calls names to pick up donated cans of green beans and chicken noodle soup. “It’s humiliating to be in this position,” she says, her composure giving way abruptly to tears. “There’s a value that is inbred by your parents. You contribute to society. You don’t take from it.” Eileen has landed at the confluence of two precarious currents tearing at the foundation of this waterfront community on Florida’s southwestern coast and, more broadly, the American economic landscape. The gears of the foreclosure machinery grind on as millions of formerly middle-class suburbanites continue to slip into poverty — each reinforcing the other. Since the real estate bubble burst, replacing the finer points of no-money-down mortgages with details of the bankruptcy code, Cape Coral and the city of Ft. Myers across the river have become leading centers of foreclosure. As of August, more than one in 10 homes in the greater metropolitan area was in some stage of the process, according to CoreLogic, a housing data research firm. Nearly 17 percent of homeowners were delinquent on their mortgage payments by 90 days or more. “I’d like to think we’ve been through the ugliest part of the foreclosure process,” says Marc Joseph, a local realtor. “But we’re nowhere near out of the woods.” Not coincidentally, Cape Coral has emerged as a conspicuous example of another wrenching American trend — the growth of the suburban poor . Between 2007 and 2010, the share of people living in poverty in the suburbs of Cape Coral, a city of about 150,000, leaped from 11.3 percent to 18.6 percent, according to analysis of Census data by Elizabeth Kneebone, a senior research associate for the Metropolitan Policy Program at the Brookings Institution. Only Modesto, Calif., another community assailed by foreclosure, suffered a larger percentage increase during those years. A full accounting of the human costs of this reckoning runs beyond the material facts of diminished incomes and homes lost to foreclosure. It encompasses the anxiety and bewilderment that now dominates life in many households. That includes the soaring demand for aid. Local relief organizations such as Community Cooperative Ministries, Inc., which runs the food bank at the United Way House, have grown accustomed to a steady influx of people who had never before in their lives asked for help. In 2007, the year the recession officially began, United Way received 19,000 calls on its 211 hotline, a kind of 911 call center for people who need food and help paying their bills. Last year the hotline fielded 59,000 calls. A full accounting also includes those hunkered down inside deteriorating houses effectively lost to the messy filing cabinets of the financial system — people who have not made payments to the bank in years, yet have received no orders to vacate. They occupy the surreal purgatory of the mortgage crisis, a morally ambiguous realm in a nation where the very concept of ownership seems to have been compromised. To the outsider, they are freeloaders occupying properties at no expense, but they speak of daily fears of eviction and a dispiriting sense of rootlessness, their futures colored darkly in uncertainty. And a full accounting must include the spectacle of a senior citizen who began working as a teenager, who thought she would by now be sitting on her lanai drinking in the musty Florida breeze, yet instead needs charity to keep herself fed. “It’s devastating,” Eileen says. “I did everything I was supposed to do.” HOUSE OF CARDS Ever since the boom in American real estate gave way to a crippling bust, I have used Cape Coral as a journalistic laboratory to explore the consequences. On my first trip here, four years ago , I confronted a community in which declining housing prices were insinuating themselves into basic expectations about the future. The school district was scrapping plans to construct new buildings. The city was putting off a plan to expand the sewer system. On my second trip two years later , the mess left behind by the real estate disaster had seeped into the fiber of the community. Code enforcement officers found themselves picking through the detritus left behind by families abandoning homes lost to foreclosure — human excrement, boxes full of unpaid bills, furniture left curbside. Joseph, the real estate agent, had begun running foreclosure bus tours, serving up distressed real estate as something like an amusement park adventure for opportunistic buyers. But on my most recent trip here late last month, the mess seemed to have crystallized into something permanent. More than its physical imprint of dilapidation, the decline has brought financial pain to the doors of people who did not even participate in the upside, back when real estate was synonymous with growing local spending power. Even people like Eileen are now suffering. Eileen did not partake in the orgy of real estate speculation that has made Cape Coral an involuntary poster child for homes surrendered to banks. She is living in the same 1,900-square-foot, single-story stucco home she built 18 years ago. Her mortgage balance is just $43,000. Unlike many of her neighbors, she did not tap her home equity for a newer car or a boat. She did not sign off on an exotic mortgage to trade up for a larger lot on the water with a swimming pool. She watched such things happening all around her with a mixture of scorn and alarm. “I saw all these young people buying all these beautiful homes on the water,” she recalls. “I thought, ‘I can’t afford to get something like that. How can they afford it?’ It was not obvious to me, and I knew there had to be a consequence. It’s a house of cards. It’s going to come tumbling down.” But even as she avoided participating in the events that turned Cape Coral into a financial wasteland, her prudence did not render her immune to the consequences of its collapse. In every direction, houses once full of retirees and families with children have gone lifeless, with weeds overtaking some formerly well-tended yards, and trash piling up in empty driveways. She is not clear on the particulars — who landed in foreclosure, who walked away, who moved, who died. But the effect is palpable: Her neighborhood is pockmarked by abandonment. “It’s been happening up and down the street,” she says. “It’s tragic. Young people raising families, they need a home. It’s home to their kids. They’re in school. They lose everything when they walk away. It’s a very, very sad thing.” Eileen is adamant that she will hang on to her own home, yet she is also cognizant of the arithmetic. Her monthly mortgage payment is only $600, yet her retirement savings now produces less than $1,000 a month in income. “Every month,” she says, “I struggle to make that payment.” So she applies for jobs, bracing for rejection. Online applications for secretarial work yield come-ons for commission-only positions selling insurance. An administrative job she sees advertised at a nearby hospital attracts 1,500 applicants. She is taking classes on how to use spreadsheets and word processing software, but she cannot dismiss the sinking feeling that even additional skills will not transcend the crudest facts of her situation. “Look at me,” she says. “I’m an old lady. Nobody wants to bring an old lady in.” LIFE BEYOND WINTER Sprawling across a flat peninsula, Cape Coral has for decades beckoned as a developer’s paradise, with tens of thousands of buildable lots arrayed on a network of canals filtering into the Gulf. From the Midwest to the Northeast, the winter-averse have descended, availing themselves of waterfront access at discount prices. By the dawn of the 2000s, this process was accelerating dramatically, fueled by a credit bubble that made mortgages nearly as easy to secure as scratch-off lottery tickets. Speculators poured in, smelling easy winnings. Between 2000 and 2004, the median house price in the Cape Coral-Ft. Myers metro area soared by 70 percent, reaching $192,100, according to the Florida Association of Realtors. In 2005 alone, the price jumped by another 45 percent to $278,000. But these increases rested on the assumption that new people would continue to pour into the area and snap up the properties then being constructed seemingly at the rate of Lego pieces. When the markets figured out that much of the appreciation was the result of speculators flipping properties to other speculators, local real estate suddenly looked like a Ponzi scheme and prices commenced plunging. By 2008, the median home was selling for $153,000. In 2009, it dropped to $88,000, less than one-third of its value only four years earlier. Thousands of homeowners who had bet on being able to refinance their mortgages before their low introductory rates jumped sharply higher instead saw their equity wiped out, triggering a wave of foreclosures. Speculators walked away, leaving their bad investments to the elements. At the worst of it, in the summer of 2009, nearly 14 percent of all houses in the metropolitan area were in foreclosure, according to CoreLogic. At the offices of the realty companies that remain, marketing efforts filled with golden sunsets and yachts have given way to signs promising full lists of distressed property. Outside Lehigh Acres, a spread of suburban development carved from former pasture east of Ft. Myers, the model homes once draped in banners for national homebuilders are largely abandoned. A hot-pink stretch Hummer sits parked in front of one such home, now the headquarters of a limousine company. Some now see signs of a turnaround. By the middle of this year, the median home was again selling for more than $100,000 — a fraction of the market’s peak, yet up from its nadir. And sales volume has exploded: More 16,000 homes changed hands in Lee County, which contains Cape Coral and Ft. Myers, in both 2009 and 2010. The county is on track to hit similar numbers this year. But much of this volume represents speculators returning to scoop up distressed assets. Few foresee an end to the ceaseless drip of foreclosed homes landing on the market, even as the pace of foreclosure has slowed. The slowdown has more to do with bottlenecks in the court system than improving economics, say realtors and housing experts. Following disclosures that many lenders did not properly handle the paperwork during the real estate bubble, many banks lack the documents needed to establish title and foreclose on a given property. Faced with a flurry of lawsuits from state attorneys general charging them with unlawful foreclosures, and under fire from some judges who accuse them of unjustly seizing homes, mortgage companies are generally moving much more slowly to take possession of homes when the owners stop making the payments. Where a foreclosure in Lee County once took an average of six to nine months to complete, the process now runs nearly two years. Indeed, banks now find it so difficult to complete foreclosures that they are pursuing alternatives — not least short sales, in which a house is sold for less than the outstanding balance on its mortgage. Four years ago, homeowners who owed more than their homes were worth were generally eager to unload their properties via short sales, but banks were reluctant to go along, resistant to selling at a loss. Today that dynamic has reversed. Cognizant that they can remain for years before foreclosure becomes final, so many people here now live in houses without making payments that the banks offer them $10,000 and $15,000 checks to sell their properties short. Whatever happens next seems certain to involve more distressed property landing on markets, though likely in a trickle as opposed to a surge. Realtors engage in a parlor game, trying to calculate the size of the so-called shadow inventory — homes that banks have taken or will take through foreclosure, but which are not listed on the market. So long as this inventory remains, so will downward pressure on prices and the financial strain that has become as much a feature of life here as palm trees and golf carts. “There’s so many people that haven’t even been addressed,” says Joseph, the real estate agent. “There’s still a big shadow out there.” PURGATORY IN PARADISE Lisa Chandler is living in that shadow. More than two years ago, in April 2009, the duplex she was renting fell into foreclosure. A judge gave her 30 days to vacate. For Chandler, 40, this was an emergency. She had been unemployed since almost two years earlier, when the construction supply company where she worked fell on hard times and laid her off. A single mother of two boys, she went from earning more than $40,000 a year to subsisting on a $250 weekly unemployment check, supplemented by $400-a-month in food stamps and $200-a-month in child support. She was pregnant with her third boy. She needed a new place to live, fast. She soon found a four-bedroom, two-story house with a swimming pool and jacuzzi in an older, established part of Cape Coral. The owner told her that he, too, was behind on his mortgage payments, but expressed confidence that he could ultimately work something out with the bank. He let her rent it for a mere $600 a month, with the proviso that the property was entirely her problem: If something broke, she was on her own. “It sounded like a good deal,” she says. Two weeks after she moved in, the foreclosure paperwork arrived in the mail, and she prepared herself for another forced exit. Then, nothing happened. Months passed without clarity. More than two years later, little has changed. “I think my particular house is kind of lost in the system,” she says. Last April the bank sent two people to the house with clipboards and cameras. They took photos and made a note that she was occupying the property, but nothing more came in the mail. She recently checked the website of the Lee County Clerk’s Office and discovered that the house was officially foreclosed in September 2010, yet no eviction notice has come. She stopped paying the rent more than a year ago, when her unemployment benefits ran out. When she bumped into her landlord recently, he expressed surprise that she was still in the house, but seemed not to care. Meantime, Chandler has grappled with the consequences of living in a home she cannot maintain. Back when her baby was only a few weeks old, one of the toilets developed a leak that she did not detect until it produced a $1,000 water bill. When she could not pay, the city shut off her water. After a month of shuttling in buckets of water from neighbor’s homes, she persuaded the city to restore the flow while putting her on a payment plan, she says. Then the central air conditioning system gave out. She added a window unit to a small bedroom downstairs, where she and her boys now typically cluster, exploiting their lone refuge from the heat. While her sons watch television, she sends out fresh job applications. She pressed her laptop against the wall to tap the one spot where she can sometimes cadge a free internet connection from a neighbor’s Wi-Fi network. Her house feels like what it is — a tenuous shelter of indeterminate duration. Upstairs, clothes lie strewn across the bedroom floors. A bed sits parked in the living room downstairs, amid half-open boxes of books and clothes. Behind a sliding door, the pool and hot tub are choked with neon-green algae and mud, since she cannot afford the chemicals needed to clean them. The garage is full of odd pieces of furniture and bric-a-brac she picked up from an older couple who walked away from their home and moved into their RV. She has sold some of this stuff at garage sales to raise funds — tools, a picnic table, a workbench. She sold a lawn mower for $200. Since then, a city code enforcement officer has begun threatening her with a fine if she does not trim the green haze of grass and weeds — a potential nesting ground for snakes and rodents — encasing the property. “He says, ‘You shouldn’t even be living here,’ ” she says. “You’re squatting.” If only she had an alternative, she says, she would have moved out long ago. “I don’t want to stay here until I have to leave,” she says. “I’d like to move, but I can’t. I don’t have any money.” The local utility recently informed her it would shut down her electricity for lack of payment. She managed to keep the lights by calling in a payment by phone, despite the fact that her bank account lacked the funds. “I wrote a bad check,” Chandler says. “I knew I didn’t have the funds, but I said, ‘Let me try it. If it goes through, I have electricity for another day.’ ” Then she called 211, where an operator referred her to the United Way House. When she arrived, Community Cooperative Ministries agreed to pay her electric bill for a month. How long will she stay in this home seemingly claimed by no one? Where will she go if she must? She contemplates these questions while her 18-month-old son cheerfully explores the wooden children’s table and chairs painted with farm animals set in a corner of the United Way House. At home, he lacks such amenities. “My plan?” Chandler asks. “My plan is to get a plan. I’m just trying to get through, and I’m hoping they don’t come knocking on the door.” THE SHADOW LENGHTENS By all indications, several more years could pass before a knock comes. Cape Coral is so saturated with delinquency, and the banks are grappling with so much legal scrutiny, that the foreclosure process is lengthening further. “The bank can only take back so many homes at a time,” says Bobby Mahan, a real estate broker whose company, Selling Paradise, has become largely focused on the trade in distressed property. “Everybody who knows anything says this shadow inventory isn’t going to clear out until 2016.” On the other side of the river in Ft. Myers, a woman who once earned a six-figure salary selling real estate says she has not made a payment on her own five-bedroom house for more than four years. Yet she is still there, inside a gated community. Her lender, Bank of America, sent her a delinquency notice back when she first stopped paying, she says, but has yet to complete the foreclosure. The real estate agent, who shared her story on condition she not be named, says she was laid off in the midst of the unraveling in 2007. She now works part-time answering the phones at a retail business and does some real estate sales on the side, not enough to afford her nearly $5,000 monthly mortgage payment. “I want out of this house,” she says. “At this point, it’s just depressing. It would be nice to get on with my life. But it wouldn’t be fair to my neighbors to just walk away. The house is going to go to hell. There would be mold. I’m in a holding pattern.” Last month, she called Bank of America to check on the status of her file and see if she could pursue a short sale, she says. “This idiot tells me that they don’t have access to my file,” she says. Apparently, the bank lost the paperwork and has been unable to track it down. The representative promised to call back, she says, but three weeks later, her phone has yet to ring. Sometimes, though, finality comes even when it is unwanted. Four years ago, Asheley Mass, a 30-year-old single mother, paid $184,000 for a three-bedroom home in Cape Coral, taking on mortgage payments of $1,220 a month. At the time, she was able to manage that sum easily. She worked as a permitting and office manager at a local civil engineering firm, earning nearly $60,000 a year. But when construction dried up, so did her hours and her annual bonus. Last August, she was laid off. Mass tried and failed to secure relief from her bank through a mortgage modification, she says. Initially, she was turned away because she was current on her mortgage, making the payment by tapping her rapidly diminishing savings. A representative told her only the delinquent were securing relief. But when she stopped making payments, the bank offered to cut her burden by only $20 a month. In January, she gave up altogether on making payments, intent on putting aside as much cash as possible to start over in a rental. Last month, she found herself in a courtroom in downtown Ft. Myers, where she hoped to plead her case to the judge. This was the first house she had ever owned. It was home to her 11-year-old daughter. She had refurbished the kitchen. She wanted to keep it, if only the bank would share the loss and give her a lower payment. The lawyers for the bank and the judge all seemed familiar with one another in a clubby sort of way, she says. They exchanged inside jokes and spoke in shorthand as they processed a fat stack of files. They acted as if they were surprised that she had bothered to attend a hearing that seemed merely pro forma, another box to check on the paperwork. And the judge appeared amused and unmoved by her speech, she says. “I tried to tell him what had happened, how my hours had been cut and how I’d lost my job,” Mass says. “He said, ‘Well, when you signed the note, it didn’t say I promise to pay unless I lose my job.’ He was very sarcastic and treated me like another person trying to put one over on the system.” It was as if they occupied two separate worlds: these men of the court, moving their files through the pipeline, closing the books on failed investments — and her, an oddball just for showing up, confronting the loss of her home. “It feels awful,” she says. “This was my first house, and it hurts.” THE NEW NORMAL When the unraveling began here, a sense of hope endured that it was perhaps a momentary pause. Housing prices were plummeting, as they would soon nationally, but people told themselves that the Florida story would again prevail, exerting its magnetic pull on regions familiar with snow tires. Houses would be filled with retirees and younger people seeking bargains. Fear would give way to the next wave of upward mobility. But so much time has elapsed with the damage still rippling out that a sense of resignation has entered the local conversation. Among those focused on providing aid, the mission has evolved from one of handing out temporary relief. Now, they talk long-term strategies to assist a community in which poverty has become indisputably entrenched, albeit papered over for a time by easy money. “This is the new normal,” says Jorge Acevedo, pastor of the Grace United Methodist Church. “The old normal wasn’t normal.” Back in early 2006, Grace Church bought a failed grocery store in a low-income pocket of Cape Coral. The plan was to turn the building into a community center for after school programs, support groups for those struggling to overcome drug and alcohol problems, and other church gatherings. The church envisioned operating a modest food pantry that would feed perhaps 1,000 people a year. Last year, it fed about 10,000 people. This year, it is on track to feed more than 20,000. Acevedo and Wes Olds, the pastor for the campus that includes the community center, have launched a dialogue with university economists to try to settle on job creation strategies. They have begun classes to help people obtain GEDs, and coach job applicants on resume writing and interviewing strategies. They are reaching out to area businesses to foster a sense of community in the interest of spurring growth, functioning as much like members of an economic development authority as spiritual advisers. “We never dreamed this is what we’d be doing,” says Acevedo. “This is nothing that Wes and I studied at seminary.” On a recent Wednesday evening at the community center, as people wait for donated bags of groceries, some pick up donated bags of pet food. The pet ministry, as it is known, was launched in recognition that when people sink into poverty, they often give away their pets, facing a choice between feeding the children or feeding the dog. In a darkened wing of the former supermarket, dozens of bicycles line one wall. Volunteers attached to the bicycle ministry bring in abandoned models and donated parts, putting them in working order and handing them out to people who have lost cars and require transportation to get to work or school — no minor matter in a sprawling metropolis with minimal public transportation. The church is now pursuing the development of a community garden on a quarter-acre patch of the parking lot. The idea is to add homegrown fruits and vegetables to the typical goods donated to the food bank, where sugared cereals and glazed donuts take up shelf space. The garden project is also aimed at teaching congregants techniques they can use to grow food for themselves at home. The church is working to develop the garden with a group called Educational Concerns for Hunger Organization, or ECHO, which is accustomed to helping poor people in malnourished corners of the globe. “They have been doing this in Africa,” says Olds. “Now, there’s a need to do this right here.” At the back of the community center, a thrift store offers many of the goods needed to outfit a home — high chairs, clothing, appliances. It is also the scene of a love story that seems perfectly emblematic of the age, a romance forged in foreclosure. Two years ago, Stacy Linder, 42, broke his wrist, causing him to miss three months of work as a driver for Federal Express. Without his wages, he found himself unable to make the mortgage payments on his three-bedroom house, beginning a painful slide into foreclosure. Distraught and in need of fellowship, he began volunteering at the Grace Church thrift store. He found himself drawn to the store manager, Donna Wenzlaff, who had lost her own home to foreclosure after she was laid off from a local bank. Kindred spirits, the couple was soon engaged. They now spend much of their time sifting through the household goods that arrive at their loading dock — some donated, others scavenged from houses lost to foreclosure. “It’s strange,” Linder says. “You see truckloads pulling in here with furniture and things, and you think about the heartbreak of the people who left it behind. You know what they’ve gone through. It’s amazing what people have had to walk away from.”

Read the full article →

Blythe McGarvie: Income and Wealth

December 7, 2011

Years ago, while comparing various economic systems, I learned that one indication of the economic values in a culture is the reaction of a person seeing someone else driving a Mercedes sedan. An American wonders how he can afford one someday. The Soviet wonders how he can take it away. The Englishman wonders how to tax it. Today, as I listen to the pundits ruminate about the 1% of the U.S. population controlling most of the wealth in the U.S., it strikes me that we need to clarify what kind of culture we want to create. I asked Fareed Zakaria , host of CNN’s international affair program, why he and his guests frequently confuse individuals earning income and societies distributing wealth. He acknowledged that a distinction should be made. So, I am offering a simple distinction. Earning income occurs when someone works, provides a service or product and is paid by an employer, customer or borrower. Distributing wealth occurs when the government takes someone’s earned income either through taxes or usage fees and gives it to another person. Using the terms “income” and “wealth” interchangeably obfuscates the logic for assessing how the economy really works. Definitions: A sociology professor offers broader definitions : Generally speaking, wealth is the value of everything a person or family owns, minus any debts. However, for purposes of studying the wealth distribution, economists define wealth in terms of marketable assets, such as real estate, stocks, and bonds, leaving aside consumer durables like cars and household items. Income is what people earn from work, but also from dividends, interest, and any rents or royalties that are paid to them on properties they own. In theory, those who own a great deal of wealth may or may not have high incomes, depending on the returns they receive from their wealth, but in reality those at the very top of the wealth distribution usually have the most income. While the debate about income and wealth can be confused, intentionally or unintentionally, governments are the only entities that can impose taxes. Obviously, taxes have a long history in human society; the forms of taxation might change, but formal governments have a constant need to tax. Modern Society needs some funds for basic public services. However, the idea of wealth redistribution is less about raising adequate funds to perform government services and more about pursuing some subjective conception of social justice. Countries that have tried to impose economic egalitarianism have generally not prospered; a sinking pond lowers all boats. Today the United States primarily taxes income. Conversely, Italy has imposed a wealth tax for years and in September tried to increase the rates. With the new focus on the wealth tax, the Financial Times reported Italians’ anger “directed at the country’s top-earning footballers, who were exempted from the wealth tax.” Some of you may think it is a good idea to tax wealth, but to make exemptions for some people. I do not. In fact, we can learn from the case of Italy. Economist Nouriel Roubini, addressing the high debt in Italy that must be funded wrote in the FT on November 29, 2011: Influential figures in Italy have suggested a wealth tax could achieve the same reduction in public debt. But a debt restructuring is superior. To reduce the debt ratio to 90 per cent of GDP, a wealth tax would need to raise €450 billion, or 30 per cent of GDP. Even if payment of such a capital levy were spread over a decade that would imply an increase in taxes equivalent to 3 per cent of GDP for 10 years running; the resulting drop in disposable income and consumption would make Italy’s recession a depression. Restructuring the Debt or the Culture: When you read that a country or a company is restructuring debt, recognize that the losers will be the people or entities that lent or invested capital in the situation. After a restructure, investors wisely are hesitant to lose more capital and to invest in the same entity. Even the recent bankruptcy of American Airlines reveals that the shareholders lost their wealth over one year when each share valued at $8.90 dropped to $0.40 in November. Bankruptcy laws allow for contracts to be re-written and debts to be forgiven. The important point is that trust, risk tolerance, and the culture of investing changes when someone dictates reduced economic terms and attaches your wealth. America’s Poet Laureate Philip Levine, when asked about his hostility for the upper class and how he fantasized about firing a gun at every Cadillac he saw, stated “I think if we started making radical changes in the way wealth is distributed in this country, it would be a hell of a lot better.” I am not sure which country’s economic system he would prefer. If he wants to be Robin Hood, that’s thievery or if he wants to live off others’ wealth, that will kill the Golden Goose for this and future generations.

Read the full article →

Facebook Flaw Exposed CEO’s Private Photos

December 7, 2011

A security flaw on Facebook temporarily allowed users to access other members’ private photos — including images posted in Mark Zuckerberg’s friends-only collection. Several of the Facebook chief executive and founder’s pictures were then uploaded to public sites on the Web . According to ZDNet , Facebook users could access someone’s private photos by using the site’s image reporting tool. All someone had to do was: click on the report/block option select “inappropriate profile photo” choose the “nudity or pornography” option check “report to Facebook” click on the item marked “Help us take action by selecting additional photos to include with your report” At that point, portions of the user’s private photo collection were then revealed. A member of a forum on BodyBuilding.com discovered the bug and posted a message about it, complete with step-by-step instructions and screen grabs. After being notified of the problem, Facebook issued a statement that said it had disabled the reporting feature. “The bug allowed anyone to view a limited number of another user’s most recently uploaded photos irrespective of the privacy settings for these photos,” Facebook said in a statement. “This was the result of one of our recent code pushes and was live for a limited period of time. Upon discovering the bug, we immediately disabled the system, and will only return functionality once we can confirm the bug has been fixed.” The world’s largest social network did not disclose how long the bug had been live or how many users were affected, CNN reported . In his most recent post on The Facebook Blog , Zuckerberg discussed the company’s commitment to privacy and security. I founded Facebook on the idea that people want to share and connect with people in their lives, but to do this everyone needs complete control over who they share with at all times. This idea has been the core of Facebook since day one. When I built the first version of Facebook, almost nobody I knew wanted a public page on the internet. That seemed scary. But as long as they could make their page private, they felt safe sharing with their friends online. Control was key. With Facebook, for the first time, people had the tools they needed to do this. That’s how Facebook became the world’s biggest community online. We made it easy for people to feel comfortable sharing things about their real lives. We’ve added many new tools since then: sharing photos, creating groups, commenting on and liking your friends’ posts and recently even listening to music or watching videos together. With each new tool, we’ve added new privacy controls to ensure that you continue to have complete control over who sees everything you share. Because of these tools and controls, most people share many more things today than they did a few years ago. Overall, I think we have a good history of providing transparency and control over who can see your information. Facebook has also urged users to privately report vulnerabilities in the site’s code/design. Those who do so can receive a $500 bounty and a public thank you from the company.

Read the full article →

Occupy Activsts Help Families From Evictions As Part Of National Occupy Our Homes Action

December 7, 2011

WASHINGTON — In the late evening on Tuesday, Brigitte Walker welcomed Occupy Atlanta onto her property in an effort to save her Riverdale, Ga., home from foreclosure. Walker, 44, joined the Army in 1985 and had been among the first U.S. personnel to enter Iraq in February 2003. “I wasn’t happy about it,” she told The Huffington Post early Tuesday afternoon, speaking of her deployment. “But it’s my call of duty so had to do what I was supposed to do. It was a very difficult duty. It was a very emotional duty.” Walker saw fellow soldiers die, get injured. She saw a civilian with them get killed. “It was very nerve-wracking,” she said. “It makes you wonder if you’re going to survive.” She was in Iraq until May 2004, when the shock from mortar rounds crushed her spine. Doctors had to put in titanium plates to reinforce her spine, which had nerve damage. Today her range of motion is limited, and she still experiences a lot of pain. She still struggles with post-traumatic stress disorder. Loud noises and big crowds are painful. The Fourth of July is difficult for her She settled in Riverdale, a town outside of Atlanta, after purchasing a house in 2004 for $139,000. She has a brother who lives in the area and enjoyed it when she would visit him. “It seemed peaceful and quiet,” she said. “That’s what I needed.” Her active duty salary covered the mortgage. But in 2007, the Army medically retired Walker against her wishes. “I thought I was going to rehab and come back,” she said. “But they told me I couldn’t stay in.” Walker now has to rely on a disability check. After retiring from the Army, Walker used up her savings, and then got rid of a car to help pay her monthly mortgage payment. “I didn’t have problems until they put me out of the military,” she said. “It was just overwhelming.” By April of last year, she was starting to fall behind on her mortgage. JPMorgan Chase — which owns Walker’s mortgage, according to an Occupy Atlanta press release — has since begun foreclosure proceedings. She said the bank is set to take her house on January 3. “Nobody is willing to help me,” Walker said. “Where are the programs to help vets like me? I know I’m one of many.” Enter Occupy Atlanta. “I’m very hopeful that it will help me save my home and allow Chase to give me a chance to keep my home,” Walker said, speaking of the Occupiers. She added that she’s willing to celebrate Christmas with the activists. “I guess,” she said with a laugh. “As long as it takes.” Hours before Occupy Atlanta joined Walker at her home, the activists organized protests aimed at disrupting home auctions at three area courthouses. At a Fulton County Courthouse, civil rights leader Dr. Joseph Lowery joined 200 demonstrators at the county’s monthly foreclosure auction. Across the country, activists associated with the Occupy movement and Occupy Our Homes reached out to families threatened by foreclosure and highlighted the crisis with marches, rallies and press conferences. “Occupy Wall Street started because of a deep need in our country to address the financial and economic crisis that’s been created by the consolidation of wealth and political power in our country,” said Jonathan Smucker, 33, an organizer with Occupy Wall Street in New York. “The foreclosure crisis, at least as much as anything else, illustrates the deep moral crisis that we are facing. It illustrates what you have when you have your whole political system serving the needs of the one percent.” Mothers spoke out on front lawns. In New York City, Occupy Wall Street marched through the streets of East New York. At the same time, Occupy groups were protesting home auctions in Nevada and New Orleans. In Seattle protesters tried to save a family from eviction . In all, activists took over vacant homes or homes facing foreclosures from being evicted in 20 cities. During the actions, the activists tried to keep the mood light. In Chicago they planned a house-warming party for a family moving into an abandoned home. To announce their presence in New York, protestes held a block party and, in a play on police tape, wrapped a home in yellow tape bearing the word “Occupy.” As the protest were taking place, the Government Accountability Office, an investigative arm of Congress, released a new report that found an increasing number of American homes are going unused, a spike attributed to high foreclosure and unemployment rates. “According to Census Bureau data, nonseasonal vacant properties have increased 51 percent nationally from nearly 7 million in 2000 to 10 million in April 2010, with 10 states seeing increases of 70 percent or more,” the report read. “High foreclosure rates have contributed to the additional vacancies. Population declines in certain cities and high unemployment also may have contributed to increased vacancies.” Vacant homes can cause a number of problems for the communities their located in, the report noted: “Vacant and unattended residential properties can attract crime, cause blight, and pose a threat to public safety.” The need for action was obvious to Smucker. “People need a place to live,” he said. “People need to have homes. Kids need to be able to count on not having to move, having some stability in their lives. That’s something we can all agree on in this country.” Some of the most powerful stories came from the homeowners Occupiers targeted during the day’s events. One mother from Petaluma, Calif, held a press conference outside her home and discussed her struggle with foreclosure . An Oregon mother talked about her lose of a second job, cancer and bankruptcy at an event at her house. In Old Fourth Ward neighborhood of downtown Atlanta, Occupiers came to the Pittman family home. Carmen Pittman, 21, said the home has been the backdrop to every family function and holiday dinner as far back as she can remember. The ranch-style home had been in the Pittman name since 1953. “My every Christmas, my every Thanksgiving, my every birthday, my every dinner was in this house,” Pittman told HuffPost early this afternoon. “This was the base home. We could not stay away form this home. This home is my every memory.” Now she worries that the last memory she will have is the home’s foreclosure. Her grandmother had become too sick to deal with the ballooning mortgage, and never addressed the court papers that arrived in the mail. Shortly before she passed away, the family finally realized the home was being foreclosed on when they got a notice on the front door. They have had to scramble ever since. But on Tuesday, Pittman was feeling good about her prospects after the Occupy group had come to the house. “Maybe somebody heard my cries,” she said. “I’m full of sadness and joy. It’s like two mixed feelings at the same time.” Walker, the Iraq War vet, let the Occupy Atlanta activists set up tents on her property this evening. While her eviction date is still set for Jan. 3, she said she remained cautiously optimistic that her situation could change. “Everything’s fine,” she said. “Everything’s good. They have the tents set up outside. It’s awesome. I was a little nervous. But it’s awesome. I’m really hopeful and happy. I’m feeling really hopeful. I don’t feel like all is lost anymore.” Additional reporting by Arthur Delaney.

Read the full article →

‘I’m Not Going Through This Alone’: City’s Foreclosure Victims Vow To Stay Put

December 7, 2011

SAN FRANCISCO — Hundreds of foreclosure victims and tenants’ rights advocates gathered throughout the Bay Area Tuesday as part of the nationwide “Occupy Our Homes” campaign , placing pressure on local officials and vowing to remain in their homes in the face of eviction. In San Francisco, protesters convened at Vivian Richardson’s Bayview residence. Richardson became a local symbol of the foreclosure crisis when her bank tried to seize her home despite months of unsuccessful loan modification attempts. Only after supporters spent a full day sending more than 1,400 emails on her behalf did the bank place her case under review. Since then, Richardson has worked tirelessly on behalf of fellow foreclosure victims in her neighborhood, spearheading a movement called the “Foreclosure Fighters” and holding regular meetings at her home. (SCROLL DOWN FOR PHOTOS AND VIDEO) “It has been too long coming,” Richardson told The Huffington Post. “We’ve been given the run-around from the banks and the lenders. We definitely need to be speaking up and speaking out.” Tuesday’s event featured speakers from two other Bayview residents fighting eviction in the midst of complex loan modification efforts and a stagnant system. Denise Collins, a school bus driver, and Archbishop Franzo King, a church leader, both shared their stories and pledged to defend their homes. After Richardson’s meeting, dozens more demonstrators joined a march to City Hall to demand the sheriff place a moratorium on subsequent foreclosures. Sixty evictions are scheduled to take place in San Francisco on Wednesday alone. And the numbers only get more staggering. Eleven homes on Richardson’s block face foreclosure. Those houses join some 3,500 throughout the rest of the Bayview neighborhood, 12,600 in San Francisco proper and 2.1 million in the state of California. “This is not some television movie. Although it probably seems like a scary movie,” Richardson said. “These are real lives. You’re closing up these foreclosed homes and leaving them to sit. If nothing else, rent it back to the homeowner until you decide what to do with it.” According to Grace Martinez, an organizer with the Alliance of Californians for Community Empowerment , activists are pushing for a three-tiered strategy in San Francisco: place a moratorium on evictions while banks are investigated, enact legislation that protects tenants’ rights, and create a larger platform for constituents to tell their stories and voice their concerns. Meanwhile, across the bridge, protesters gathered at the West Oakland BART station with Just Cause (a multiracial grassroots organization promoting community leadership) and Occupy Oakland to protest the foreclosures in Oakland. In particular, the group protested Fannie Mae’s aggressive foreclosure on the home of the Oakland-based Ramirez family. At the BART station rally, Margarita Ramirez took the microphone and told her story, speaking in Spanish with a Just Cause translator. “In 2009, my husband lost his job and we were unable to make payments on our loan. So we went to Bank of America and applied for a HAMP loan through Fannie Mae.” Ramirez said that both she and Bank of America continuously called to check on the status of the loan, but heard nothing from Fannie Mae. Finally, on April 18, 2011, Ramirez received a letter from the agency informing her that she was ineligible for the HAMP program, and had 30 days to explore other options. Two weeks later, while the Ramirez family was in the process of modifying their loan with Bank of America, they received a notification that the home had been sold — nearly two weeks before the deadline. “They didn’t even give us a chance,” Ramirez told HuffPost. “Bank of America asked them to rescind the sale, but they refused.” Just Cause alleges that the Ramirez family may have been targeted for being poor, Latino and Spanish-speaking. In a show of solidarity with the Ramirez family, protesters marched down the street to a local Fannie Mae foreclosed home on Tenth Street and Mandela Parkway that had been vacant for more than six months. “We are here today so that a house that was vacant yesterday becomes one that has use to the community today,” Nell Myhand of Just Cause told HuffPost. “90 percent of the foreclosed homes in Oakland were in the same neighborhoods where the subprime loans went. That’s not a coincidence; that’s egregious. We need our homes more than Fannie Mae needs one more.” Upon arrival, protesters hung banners around the home, set up community service tables in the living room and started cooking food for the hungry. “We’re going to keep occupying Fannie Mae’s homes because they have homes that are vacant that could be put to good uses like housing people or providing services for people,” said Robbie Clark with Just Cause. Clark said that the group would not leave the home until Fannie Mae returned the deed to the Ramirez family. “We’re taking the opportunity to let Fannie Mae know that we’re going to take your home until you give us back ours,” she added. Ramirez spoke with protesters and Just Cause supporters as her young son explored the home. Organizers posted a sign-up sheet for anyone who needed a place to sleep. Meanwhile, numerous police cars idled down the block. Although the scene at Tenth and Mandela was calm and celebratory, supporters said that they realized it would not remain calm for long. Foreclosure victims and housing advocates say they are prepared to fight until the end. “It took a lot to just say, ‘You know what? I’m not going through this alone. My neighbors are going through it as well,’” Richardson said. “I had to put my shame and embarrassment behind me, leave that outside, and go fight.” Take a look at images and videos from Tuesday’s events below:

Read the full article →

Laura Kiss: Professor Monti, It Could Be Better for Italy

December 6, 2011

Professor Monti is a smart, prepared, well educated and charming Italian man. Nothing in comparison with what Italians have had to suffer with Berlusconi for the past 17 years. He is one of the best economic brains of Europe and has adopted a very appreciated low profile in running the country. So low that he announced to Italians that, as a personal decision, he is renouncing his salary as Prime Minister and Minister for the Economy. Being so smart, he is also very aware that his government is a technical one and has to look for the approval of the parliament in order to survive. And, as we know, the Italian parliament is not an easy entity with which to deal. In recent days, in order to try to save Italy from default, Professor Monti has tried to assure Italians with three key words: recovery, equity and growth. We had hoped that “equity” would be kept in first place in his financial mesaures contained in the austerity package, but as it has been presented, people have noticed that equity has been left far behind. It is true, all categories of Italians are effected by these measures. The country is so destroyed after Berlusconi that we are all aware that we have lived beyond our means and that something has to be changed. But, excuse me Professor, some distinguo would not hurt. If I have a pension of 1.000 euros a month, or if I have 5.000 euros a month makes a big difference. Not to mention the new law that reintroduces the tax on properties: all houses, no matter if you own 1 or 50, will be taxed. Correct, but what about the Vatican that owns the most valuable properties in this country? Does Professor Monti know that religiouse buildings, convents, institutes, residences are very often being transformed into hotels? That religious orders run regular commercial activities related to tourism and that the revenues of religious tourism are a big part of the Vatican State GDP? And what about the costs of the political system in a country that is facing the worst financial crisis since the second world war? The austerity package makes mention only of the life annuity of parlamentarians (millions of euros every year) which will be a subject for discussion in the next legislature. The number of the councillors at the provincial government level will decrease but not one word about the number of parlamentarians (the second highest in Europe after UK, 951 in Italy, 1477 in UK), or the cost of their salaries and benefits. We know, Professor Monti, that your job is really difficult and we understand that you have to find a decent compromise in order to obtain the parliament vote of confidence. And we also know that the time has expired for Italy if we don’t want to face further recession. But please, for the future of this country, try to be more fair and give us a stronger sign of social justice.

Read the full article →

Nathan Newman: Who Will Watch the Watchers? Google & Facebook Privacy Audits Should be Fully Public

December 6, 2011

Facebook this past month agreed to twenty years of independent audits of its privacy practices, joining Google which agreed earlier this year to similar audits following its breaches of user privacy when it introduced its aborted Buzz social network. As this piece outlines, the audits should be moderately extensive in examining how consumers’ personal information is being used internally at these companies — how it’s aggregated or repurposed — and when it’s being shared with third parties (such as advertisers). “Problems that come out in audits could be costly — $16,000 per violation per day, if the FTC decided to pursue the fines in court.” So far all to the good, but the problem is in the “if” the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) decides to pursue the problems. Where will the public pressure be on the regulators to pursue problems? As we saw in the financial crisis, without pretty broad public scrutiny of the regulators themselves, you often don’t get the vigilant regulation needed to restrain corporate malfeasance. The Audits Won’t be Fully Public: And here’s the big problem with these privacy audits. When they were first being discussed, consumer groups like the Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC) asked that any audits be made public. The response from the Federal Trade Commission was not encouraging. They told the groups the audits would not be published but “the public may have access to the submissions required pursuant to the order” using tools like the Freedom Of Information Act (FOIA). Having to jump through bureaucratic hoops to get the information is bad enough, but the real kicker is in the ” may” in that sentence, since the FTC writes: In some cases, these documents may contain trade secrets or other confidential commercial or financial information, or information about consumers or other third parties, that would be exempt from public disclosure. Accordingly, as provided by statute, companies may request confidential treatment for these documents or portions of these documents under Commission procedures. Upon receipt of such a request, the Commission conducts a review to determine whether confidential treatment is warranted. So the company may be using innovative strategies to violate consumer privacy and will demand that the FTC hide those methods from the public by deeming them “trade secrets.” The joke here is that these companies are systematically violating consumer privacy but are demanding secrecy for the regulatory review of those violations. I’m sure that companies would love to deem a lot of financial information required in Securities Exchange Commission (SEC) filings to be “trade secrets” but thank god the SEC disclosure laws were written before companies had mastered the art of suppressing government information they don’t want public. Google’s Track Record of Evading Public Accountability: This suppression of information companies don’t want public, especially by tech companies like Google, has become all too common. A recent report by the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press , Uncivil Secrecy , detailed the rising problem of Google in particular getting information arising from litigation in the courts suppressed: far from making its own legal documents “universally accessible,” Google routinely uses overly broad requests to seal court filings, according to critics, in apparent contravention of its commitment to the public interest in the free flow of information…Google’s use of sealing requests to suppress information contained in court documents it files is remarkable — both in the frequency with which the company makes such requests and the material underlying them. The report cites multiple examples of the company trying to suppress evidence of alleged illegal practices revealed during court proceedings. Courts too often agree to companies like Google seeking to seal such court record. Paul Alan Levy, an attorney for Public Citizen which has regularly litigated to open up such corporate information to the public, argues, “The effect is the removal of an important check on the accountability of courts and lack of understanding about why courts make the decisions they do.” Allowing the FTC to leave potentially large portions of any privacy audits of Google and Facebook secret will similarly remove accountability not just for those companies but for the regulatory agencies themselves, since the public will not know whether lack of action is due to the agency finding no real privacy problems or because the agencies are too cozy with the companies they are regulating. Ever Expanding Corporate Surveillance Requires Openness of Those Company’s Privacy Policies: The need for publicly available audits of companies’ privacy actions is becoming all the more important as those companies know almost everything about consumer activities. Just last week, Google announced it will soon start offering one-day shipping for merchants it works with on online commerce. Taking control of a large portion of e-commerce delivery will allow Google to harvest a massive new amount of data about consumers to feed Google’s datamining efforts and behavioral profiling of consumers. Google will be able to track consumers from initial search for an item to finding a merchant to deciding to purchase the item to where the item is delivered, how it is paid for and track an aggregation of all sales going through its system. Google will have data about the whole consumer cycle of consumerism — the holy grail of the advertisers from which the company makes its money. Whether consumers will ultimately benefit from such a move is an open question — especially if it just reinforces Google’s monopoly dominance in more sectors and undermines e-commerce innovation — but the only way the public will have any clue whether company profits are just coming at the expense of their privacy is if the privacy audits of the company’s actions are public available. If Google wants to have the role of trustee of more information about more people than any other company and even more information in many areas than government has, then it should accept in turn public scrutiny of its actions as well. Google and Facebook have both promoted the idea that society benefits from more openness and sharing. Sharing the full results of their privacy audits is a good way to practice what they preach about openness. More broadly, as the FTC and DOJ move forward on a range of privacy and antitrust investigations, we should expect far more public disclosure of their decision-making and what those investigations are revealing about consumer rights in the age of ever increasing corporate surveillance.

Read the full article →

Former HP Chair Dies At 58

December 5, 2011

SAN FRANCISCO — Patricia Dunn, the former Hewlett-Packard Co. chairwoman who authorized a boardroom surveillance probe that ultimately sullied her remarkable rise from investment bank typist to the corporate upper class, has died after a long bout with cancer. She was 58. Dunn died Sunday morning at her home in Orinda surrounded by her family, according to her sister, Debbie Lammers. She said Dunn’s ovarian cancer had returned. Once one of the most powerful women in corporate America, Dunn saw her career tarnished in 2006 when she was ousted from HP and brought up on criminal charges – which were ultimately dropped – for approving the company’s plan to snoop into the private phone records of board members, journalists and HP employees to catch people leaking to the media. The scandal unfolded as Dunn continued to battle a disease that had haunted her through a sparkling investment banking career and a stormy nine-year stretch on the board of HP, one of the world’s largest technology companies. Dunn had spent time on philanthropic matters in the years since the scandal, Lammers said. Dunn and her husband, Bill Jahnke, endowed a faculty position at the University of California, San Francisco’s Department of Surgery named in honor of her mother, who also died of cancer. Lammers said she wanted people to remember her sister’s “incredibly influential rise in her professional life and her courage and valiant battles over the course of her treatments.” “Her example of leadership, courage and poise throughout her professional and personal life was exemplary,” Lammers told The Associated Press on Monday. Dunn’s time at HP coincided with some of the most contentious and challenging periods since the Palo Alto-based company was founded in 1939. Dunn joined HP’s board in 1998 and was instrumental in the hiring and firing of CEO Carly Fiorina, whose flamboyant personality and ferocity in securing the $19 billion purchase of Compaq Computer Corp. ultimately helped hasten her ouster amid a sagging stock price and disappointing results from the combined company. Dunn was the one who announced Fiorina’s ouster in February 2005 and named her low-key successor, Mark Hurd, previously CEO of NCR Corp. Hurd himself was ousted last year after an investigation into a sexual harassment claim found inconsistencies in expense reports filed. Dunn also assumed Fiorina’s role as chairwoman at the time. Dunn was forced out in that role in September 2006 in an embarrassing scandal involving spying on the telephone records of board members and journalists to ferret out the source of leaks to the media. Just a month later, California’s attorney general charged Dunn and four others with four felony counts each – conspiracy, fraud, identity theft and illegally using computer data – for their roles in the probe. That came just two days before she started chemotherapy treatments for advanced ovarian cancer. The criminal charges against Dunn were eventually dropped, as prosecutors said she had little involvement in the actual “pretexting” – the ruse used by investigators to view private telephone records by pretending to be someone else – and because of her ailing health. Charges against the other defendants were also dropped, with a Santa Clara County Superior Court judge calling their conduct “a betrayal of trust and honor” at worst that was not criminal behavior at the time it occurred. Once an aspiring investigative reporter, Dunn, a graduate of the University of California, Berkeley, found more immediate and lucrative work in the financial world and made her mark in investment banking. After working briefly as a part-time reporter for a community newspaper in San Francisco, Dunn began her corporate climb by capitalizing on a temporary typist gig that she landed at an investment firm in the 1970s. She was able to turn the two-week typing assignment into full-time work and managed to quickly rise through the ranks by earning a reputation as a hard-edged businesswoman. That reputation eventually helped her earn the promotion to CEO of fund management behemoth Barclays Global Investors in 1995. Dunn’s life had been far from charmed. Financial difficulties dogged her family throughout her childhood, and her father, a vaudeville actor, died of a heart attack before she was a teen. After the death, the family moved to Marin County, north of San Francisco, and her mother’s emotional health deteriorated. Dunn’s mother later died of breast cancer. It was at the height of Dunn’s corporate success when she was diagnosed with cancer herself, forcing her to step down in 2002 from her role as Barclays CEO to fight breast cancer and melanoma. Two years later, she was diagnosed with ovarian cancer, and in fall 2006, she underwent surgery for a metastasized tumor – three weeks before the public learned of the HP investigation that spawned congressional investigations, criminal probes and forced Dunn’s resignation. As Dunn and others involved in the probe grappled with the fallout, the public was given a rare view of the workings of a board consumed with bitter rivalries and dysfunction. The probe Dunn authorized ultimately identified renowned physicist and former presidential adviser George Keyworth as the director who spoke anonymously to a technology news website about a confidential board retreat. Some viewed the article as innocuous. Venture capitalist Tom Perkins resigned from the board in protest over the investigators’ tactics. Dunn’s family is planning a memorial service in San Francisco. Dunn is survived by her husband, Jahnke; three adult children, Janai Brengman, Michelle Cox and Michael Jahnke; ten grandchildren; a brother, Paul Dunn, and a sister, Lammers.

Read the full article →

Deepak Chopra: What’s the Best Outcome for Occupy Wall Street?

December 5, 2011

I find it personally very hard to understand how anyone could fail to sympathize with the Occupy movement, but I also understand why doubt and uncertainty hang in the air. As one pundit pithily remarked, “Everyone’s waiting to see if this is a movement or just a moment.” Movements fit a pattern that so far isn’t the Occupy pattern. It has no leaders, no demands, no coherent vision, and no legislation to propose. Nobody is running for Congress on an Occupy platform. All of this means that the powers that be have no pragmatic reason to come out vigorously for the Occupiers, even though more than 900 protests have been staged so far worldwide. In politics, what unites right and left is obviously opposed to these protests. Both sides share power, money, and elite privileges. Does that spell the end of the Occupy movement as soon as winter becomes hard enough and the police violent enough? It could, of course. In terms of power, the Occupiers have none. They even lack the power of civil disobedience along the model of Gandhi and Martin Luther King. Yet a secret influence may be on their side: a true shift in consciousness. If you clear out the distractions, what the Occupy movement stands for is economic inequality. The 99 percent are grossly undervalued in society. There is injustice in the way corporate greed has been allowed to wreck the global economy at will, without fear of punishment. There is injustice in the way jobs have been undermined, a manufacturing base ruthlessly destroyed for the sake of corporate profits. This injustice doesn’t affect simply the factory workers, farmers, and underclass who typically lead social revolutions. A small elite has stripped away bargaining rights, pensions, and job stability without a shred of conscience. The result has been this push-back, feeble as it looks when measured against corporate monoliths. Yet there is another side. In countries like India and China, injustice is being righted. For the first time in history, the dispossessed and least powerful people in the world, amounting to billions of them, are finding a voice and a living income at the same time. The problem with this movement toward equality is that it is coming at the expense of rich countries. The prevailing attitude (not always supported by the facts) is that America loses whenever China and India win. Yet if you stand back, the shift in consciousness is the same. Occupiers want social and economic justice, which is exactly what impoverished workers want in China and India. The specific issues aren’t the same; at times they give the appearance of being total opposites. Both sides want more jobs, and when the same job is at stake, there will be a loser and a winner. When a rich country strives to end inequality, the playing field is obviously different from that in a poor country. Even so, the shift in consciousness is the same. Michael Moore has circulated some practical action points for the Occupiers, none of which would come close to passage in the present political environment. But the first seven strike me as basic tenets of social justice, and if consciousness successfully shifts, they would serve as bellwethers of change. The seven points are: Eradicate the Bush tax cuts for the rich and institute new taxes on the wealthiest Americans and on corporations, including a tax on all trading on Wall Street (where they currently pay 0 percent). Assess a penalty tax on any corporation that moves American jobs to other countries when that company is already making profits in America. Our jobs are the most important national treasure, and they cannot be removed from the country simply because someone wants to make more money. Require that all Americans pay the same Social Security tax on all their earnings (normally, the middle class pays about 6 percent of their income to Social Security; someone making $1 million a year pays about 0.6 percent (or 90 percent less than the average person). This law would simply make the rich pay what everyone else pays. Reinstate the Glass-Steagall Act, placing serious regulations on how business is conducted by Wall Street and the banks. Investigate the Crash of 2008, and bring to justice those who committed any crimes. Reorder our nation’s spending priorities (including the ending of all foreign wars and their cost of over $2 billion a week). This will reopen libraries, reinstate band and art and civics classes in our schools, fix our roads and bridges and infrastructure, wire the entire country for 21st-century Internet, and support scientific research that improves our lives. Join the rest of the free world and create a single-payer, free and universal health care system that covers all Americans all the time. Therein lies the best future for the Occupiers, that we reach a tipping point in global awareness. The signs are good so far. The Berlin Wall stood until the day a shift in awareness knocked it down. America’s grossly unbalanced economic system stands equally firm, and although it doesn’t have the Soviet army to protect it, the attitude of corporate greed, political corruption, and elitist privilege serves just as well. That the Occupiers lack leaders, legislation, and political candidates is irrelevant. What they have on their side is truth and a sense of justice. A society that cannot pay attention to those things is by definition an unjust society and deserves to decline. In terms of raw power, the Occupiers have lost the battle in advance. But in terms of a future that rights wrongs, they are the living spark of our national conscience. For more, visit deepakchopra.com .

Read the full article →

Don Tapscott: Looking Back on My 2011 Projections

December 5, 2011

One thing pundits rarely do is review their own prognostications. A year ago I published ” 10 Big Themes for 2011 ” — related to how the digital revolution changes business and society. It’s helpful to review what actually occurred. Below are my projections and some 20-20 hindsight editorializing. 1. ” The crisis deepens . Rather than just an economic downturn, more people will recognize that we’re entering an era of profound change. The industrial economy and many of its institutions are reaching the end of their life cycles — from newspapers and old models of financial services to our energy grid, transportation systems and institutions for global cooperation and problem solving.” What happened? I think I called that one. A year ago many were saying that we had come out of the global slump and that we were in full recovery, even if it was a “jobless” one. I detest the term “jobless recovery” as an oxymoron. There is no recovery unless it’s inclusive. As for the global crisis, anyone want to debate with me that it’s getting deeper and that we need to rebuild most institutions and industries, like, say, government? 2. ” We’ve entered a new period of Global Risks . We are moving into an age where profound threats are emerging to the global economy, society and even the very existence of humanity. Failure of the financial system, weapons of mass destruction, new communicable diseases, collapse of environmental systems, water security and many other threats make the world a volatile place. Leaders unite to build a Global Risk Response System.” What happened? Possible overstatement. But consider the sovereign debt crisis, America losing its triple A rating, how the Japanese tsunami disrupted the global supply chain, the destabilization of (nuclear power) Pakistan, Iran’s steps towards nuclear weapons and the deepening crisis regarding Israel’s relationship with the Arab world — and a “Global Risk Response System” sounds like a good idea. 3. ” Worldwide generational conflict will grow . Around the planet young adults are asserting themselves in the workplace and in political arenas. Protests against entrenched governments will increase in frequency and severity.” What happened? Well I did call that one. It’s unbelievable to think that the Arab Spring, Occupy, student riots in London, millions of youth in the streets from Spain and around the world were not even on the radar a year ago. But all my work about the new generation told me that a conflagration was in the making. And this one is just beginning. 4. ” Media upheaval will intensify . Newspapers will continue to collapse, replaced by networked news models. The Huffington Post is just the beginning. More of the music consumer’s dollar will go into the pockets of artists and less to the music labels. The industry will awaken to the need to sell music as a service rather than a product. TV will continue down the path of becoming simply another app on the web.” What happened? There were very few newspaper bankruptcies and while cable television declined, TV is still alive and kicking. The biggest development here was the impact of transparency on the Rupert Murdoch empire. The good news is that while the music industry continues to decline, new players with the right business model like Spotify have entered the U.S. market and amazing networked models of the news are flourishing. 5. ” There will be an upsurge in entrepreneurial activity . In the U.S. and other countries unemployed knowledge workers, especially young people, will start their own businesses or work under personal services contracts. The internet enables small companies to have the capabilities of larger companies without the main liabilities.” What happened? “Upsurge” was not the right word. While it’s true that many young people are being forced to be entrepreneurs by high youth unemployment, they are having difficulty getting financing due to the lingering sub-prime meltdown hangover. Because 80 percent of new jobs come from companies 5 years old or less, the failure of the banks and venture capital to provide financing is a chronic problem. 6. ” The ‘app revolution’ peaks showing signs of decline . Developers, faced with so many platform choices and limitations of proprietary apps start to look to HTML5 for mobile web development. Rather than writing applications to run on separate mobile operating systems, developers will return to the uniformity of web sites accessed through browsers.” What Happened? It may have peaked but there are no signs of decline yet. But with open platforms like Android eclipsing the iconic iPhone, a turn to the web can’t be far away. 7. ” The Age of Hyper Transparency becomes clear . Right now it’s the U.S. government, but Wikileaks founder Julian Assange says private-sector companies are next, starting with the financial services industry. So if your corporation is going to be naked — and you really have no choice in the matter — you’d better be buff.” What happened? Wikileaks backed off denuding private companies. I’m not sure why because there sure is lots of extreme dirt to expose. But transparency has now become part of the public dialogue. A small indication: TED Global has themed its annual event for June 2012 “Radical Openness.” 8. ” There will be a social media privacy backlash . With the meteoric rise of social media, we are increasingly willing accomplices in undermining our own privacy rights. Privacy is the Achilles Heel of sites such as Facebook.” What happened? Concerns about privacy did explode this year and every social network and many businesses are dazed and confused. Some left Facebook for this reason to Google+ and more privacy-friendly platforms. In a shocking ruling last week the FTC came down hard on Facebook, forcing them to redesign their system and procedures to protect the privacy of their users. Given that bad privacy policies is Facebook’s Achilles Heel, the FTC may have unwittingly saved the company. 9. ” The battle over net neutrality will explode . Internet Service Providers will continue their campaign to charge premium prices for certain kinds of content, while content providers will want all Internet traffic treated fairly. The biggest confrontations will be in the wireless realm.” What happened? Not a lot. The term gets over 5 million hits on Google. But Lady Gaga gets 400 million. Champions like Google and Tim Berners Lee have had some success. Given the Obama administration’s stated support for net neutrality and an open Internet, no explosion occurred because the providers are lying low. 10. ” Two technologies — Enterprise Collaboration and Geospaciality — come of age . Foursquare was just the beginning. Get out your Google goggles and Layar Reality Browser and augment your reality. The physical and digital worlds are converging. Companies finally begin to move beyond electronic mail, document management and other primitive technologies to new collaborative Suites like Jive and Spaces.” What happened? Geospaciality continues to grow with mapping and navigation systems on hundreds of millions of mobile devices. But true augmented reality tools like Goggles and Layar are not yet exactly household words. Looking back it appears I hit eight out of ten. But what did I miss? You tell me! This article originally appeared on Reuters.com

Read the full article →

Facebook Announces Big New Buy

December 5, 2011

Facebook has acquired location-based social service Gowalla for an undisclosed sum. Both companies announced the deal on December 5. “We’re excited to confirm that Gowalla co-founders Josh Williams and Scott Raymond, along with other members of the Gowalla team, are moving to Facebook in January to join our design and engineering teams,” a Facebook rep said in a statement emailed to The Huffington Post. According to a post on the Gowalla Blog , at least part of the startup’s staff will relocate from Austin, Texas, to Palo Alto, California. Gowalla services will be shuttered in January 2012. Facebook won’t acquire any of Gowalla’s technology or user data, and the Gowalla Blog explains that the service will give its two million users a chance to extract their data before the service shuts its doors for good. CNN Money published an unconfirmed report on December 2 that Facebook would buy Gowalla. According to CNN’s sources , Gowalla talent will join Facebook’s Timeline development team, which is currently finalizing Facebook’s new profile design that debuted at the company’s recent f8 conference and is expected to begin rolling out to users soon. Since launching in 2009, Gowalla had faced steep competition from check-in service Foursquare and daily deals giant Groupon, as well as a host of other location-based check-in and rewards services. In September, Gowalla announced that it had redesigned its mobile app and planned to shift focus away from check-ins and toward user-generated reviews of local places. Those plans are now kaput. Facebook also found itself struggling to keep up in the local mobile space. The social network’s location-based deals feature, Places , which launched in August 2010, failed to take off. Almost exactly a year later, Facebook said it would shutter the project .

Read the full article →

SAP To Make $3.4 Billion Buy

December 4, 2011

SAN FRANCISCO — SAP said Saturday it is paying $3.4 billion to acquire SuccessFactors, a software company specializing in human resources tasks. It is the latest move in the escalating rivalry between SAP and Oracle Corp., and underscores the increased interest in technology companies that deliver software over the Internet, or in the so-called “cloud.” The deal calls for subsidiary SAP America Inc. to pay $40 per share in cash for SuccessFactors. That is a 52 percent premium over SuccessFactors’ closing stock price of $26.25 on Friday. The deal is expected to close in the first quarter of 2012. SAP AG is one of the world’s biggest business software makers. The German company’s specialty is business applications, such as those used for payroll and managing relationships with customers and suppliers. SuccessFactors, based in San Mateo, Calif., is a big maker of cloud-based human resources applications. The company focuses on applications for managing relationships with employees, such as organizing and developing performance reviews and bonuses. The company says it has more than 3,500 customers. It lost $12.5 million on $205.9 million in revenue last year. “The cloud is a core of SAP’s future growth, and the combination of SuccessFactors’ leadership team and technology with SAP will create a cloud powerhouse,” Bill McDermott, an SAP co-CEO, said in a statement. The deal is part of the growing rivalry between SAP and Oracle. Oracle’s push into SAP’s turf of business applications has been a multibillion-dollar affair. Oracle’s boisterous CEO Larry Ellison has pursued big-ticket acquisitions that have made his database software company a major player, behind SAP, in many different realms of the business software world. SAP is the dominant maker of business applications. The feud has gotten personal. Oracle won a $1.3 billion jury verdict against SAP last year over the widespread theft by a now-shuttered SAP subsidiary of documents from password-protected Oracle customer websites. Oracle alleged the information was used to steal business. A judge threw out the award, calling it “grossly excessive” and setting the stage for a retrial. Oracle landed a publicity jackpot from the trial. Ellison used it to repeatedly shame SAP publicly. SAP admitted the theft and agreed to pay $20 million to settle criminal charges filed by the Department of Justice over the former subsidiary’s practices.

Read the full article →

Apple Loses Battle To iPad Rival

December 4, 2011

Score one for Samsung. A U.S. judge has denied Apple’s request for a preliminary injunction against several Samsung Electronics products. A ruling in Apple’s favor would have blocked Samsung from selling some of its products in the U.S.. While Apple has maintained that several devices from Samsung’s Galaxy line of smartphones and tablets are “slavishly” copying Apple iPhone and iPad devices, U.S. District Judge Lucy Koh in San Jose, California, didn’t think Samsung’s gadgets posed enough of a threat that they should be immediately banned. “It is not clear that an injunction on Samsung’s accused devices would prevent Apple from being irreparably harmed,” Koh wrote, according to Reuters . However, Koh’s ruling doesn’t reject Apple’s patent infringement claims against the South Korea-based electronics giant. “It’s possible that Apple will get a more favorable outcome on some of the asserted rights in the main proceeding,” Foss Patents speculates . On Friday, Australia’s highest court extended a ban on Samsung’s Galaxy Tab in that country, Reuters reported . Though the injunction blocking sales of the device had been overturned on Wednesday , Apple managed to win a weeklong extension of the ban. “It’s no coincidence that Samsung’s latest products look a lot like the iPhone and iPad, from the shape of the hardware to the user interface and even the packaging,” an Apple rep told All Things D back in April , shortly after filing suit against Samsung. “This kind of blatant copying is wrong, and we need to protect Apple’s intellectual property when companies steal our ideas.” Take a look at our slideshow (below) to see a side-by-side of Apple’s iDevices and Samsung’s various Galaxy gadgets.

Read the full article →

Police Reportedly Went Undercover At Occupy LA Encampment Prior To Raid

December 3, 2011

The Associated Press LOS ANGELES (AP) — Los Angeles police used nearly a dozen undercover detectives to infiltrate the Occupy LA encampment before this week’s raid to gather information on protesters’ intentions, according to media reports Friday. (CLICK HERE OR SCROLL DOWN FOR LATEST UPDATES) None of the officers slept at the camp, but tried to blend in during the weeks leading up to the raid to learn about plans to resist or use weapons against police, a police source told the Los Angeles Times. The source spoke on the condition of anonymity because the case is ongoing. The undercover work yielded information that some protesters were preparing bamboo spears and other potentially dangerous weapons in advance of an expected eviction by the LAPD, none of which were used, according to City News Service which first reported the story. Police downplayed the significance of the undercover work since Occupy meetings were public and easily tracked. LAPD Officer Cleon Joseph declined an Associated Press request for comment on the reports. Occupy L.A. protester Mario Brito told City News Service he was not surprised by the revelation, but said it was “tantamount to 1950s McCarthyism.” Meanwhile, the city attorney’s office filed criminal misdemeanor charges Friday against 27 more of the people who were arrested following the police sweep of the camp. In all, 46 of the 291 people arrested during the raid have been charged with misdemeanor crimes of failure to disperse from an unlawful assembly. Some also were charged with resisting arrest. The arrests came Wednesday during a pre-dawn raid on City Hall Park, where nearly 500 tents had been erected at the peak of an anti-Wall Street protest, City Attorney Carmen Trutanich said. Fifty-eight posted bail or were released by police, Criminal Division Chief Earl Thomas told City News Service. An additional 187 protesters were released without bail and without being charged, because they had no prior criminal records. Bail amounts ranged from $5,000 for most of the defendants to as high as $20,000.

Read the full article →

Crisis In Europe Threatens Retirement Funds

December 3, 2011

As Europe teeters on the edge and the eurozone faces the possibility of a breakup, Americans readying themselves for retirement may need to shield their savings from a volatile stock market. The crisis in Europe is weighing on U.S. stocks, with the domestic stock market having plummeted 8.7 percent since its peak in late April. Many economists have predicted that a breakup of the eurozone would potentially plunge the U.S. into another recession. Considering that destructive potential, older Americans ought to avoid stocks and focus on safer investments such as government and corporate bonds, while people further from retirement should stay the course, experts say. While people nearing retirement usually tend to hold a larger proportion of their portfolios in bonds than stocks, some investment managers and advisers said that they should allocate an even larger proportion of their retirement funds in bonds than usual because of the crisis in Europe. “If you’re older than your typical retiree, then by all means put more of it in higher-quality bonds, because this eurozone issue is not resolved,” said Anthony Valeri, a markets strategist for fixed income with LPL Financial. Valeri recommended that people at retirement age prepare a portfolio of 80 to 90 percent high-quality U.S. bonds and just 10 to 20 percent stocks. “Some positive return [on bonds] is certainly going to help, even if it’s low.” A recession in Europe would likely bruise numerous U.S. stocks, especially bank stocks, Valeri said. If the eurozone broke up, retirement fund investments in stocks could decline 17 percent in value, while high-quality bonds probably would rise 5 to 10 percent in value, he said. Valeri added that investors who are more than five years away from retirement should keep investing in what he said are currently undervalued stocks, since they still have good long-term outlooks. Retirement plans are already taking a hit. The average Fidelity Investments retirement plan declined 12 percent in value in the third quarter of this year, putting investors behind where they stood a year ago. Few safe havens would exist in the event of a eurozone breakup, said Clark Yingst, chief market analyst for the investment firm Joseph Gunnar. He said that if a eurozone breakup looks increasingly likely, people near retirement should buy long-term U.S. government bonds, dollars and gold. If the eurozone enters a deflationary spiral of more expensive goods and lower consumer spending, a normal retirement fund would lose as much as 20 to 30 percent of its value, said Peter Cardillo, chief market economist for Rockwell Global Capital. Cardillo emphasized that since the stock market has already fallen in response to the likelihood of a recession in Europe, a recession that avoids a eurozone breakup would not hurt retirement funds a great deal. A recession in Europe would, however, damage U.S. companies by reducing European consumer demand for American goods, weakening export-driven economies in Asia and Latin America that help support U.S. economic growth, and drawing value out of U.S. stocks, since 14 percent of all S&P 500 stock sales come from Europe, said Howard Silverblatt, senior index analyst at S&P. U.S. stock values would plummet as the economic outlook in Europe darkens, he said. Some large U.S. companies have a major presence in Europe, according to Silverblatt. For example, 39.8 percent of McDonald’s sales are in Europe, as well as 25.2 percent of Johnson & Johnson’s sales, 32 percent of the sales at health care companies Becton Dickinson and Baxter International, and 17 percent of Disney’s sales, he said. A eurozone breakup could pull down the price of many of these European stocks. “It would take a huge chunk out of everything,” Silverblatt said of a eurozone breakup. Christopher Philips, senior analyst at the investment management company Vanguard, said that because of the crisis in Europe, this would be a good time for people to reconsider their overall allocation of investments between stocks and safer bonds. While the U.S. bond market consistently rose between 5 and 7 percent per year in 2007, 2008 and 2009, according to Philips, the stock market was more volatile. The S&P 500 plummeted 41 percent in 2008 and spiked 28 percent in 2009. If people want steadier income from their retirement funds, they should consider investing more in high-quality U.S. bonds, he said. But people who are still far from retirement should keep investing their retirement funds in the stock market, since stocks give retirees the best chance to maintain their long-term purchasing power in spite of inflation, some investment managers said. Stuart Ritter, vice president and financial planner at T. Rowe Price, noted that the return for investors in the S&P 500 between 1995 and 2010 — during the technology boom and bust, housing bubble, and recent financial crisis — was an average of 7 percent per year, outpacing inflation. Philips noted that declines in the stock market sometimes precede recessions, rather than occur at the same time, so it would not be a good idea to divest from retirement funds based on the stock market and economic climate. Instead, it would be best to invest a consistent 12 to 15 percent of income in one’s retirement fund, he said. “Trying to time those markets can do more harm than good,” Philips said. “One investor can end up on the wrong side of the investment if it doesn’t work out.”

Read the full article →

Philip Glass Recites The Bhagavad Gita To OWS Protestors

December 2, 2011

Yesterday, we reported composer Philip Glass was set to speak at an Occupy Wall Street protest outside the Met in Lincoln Center, where Glass’ “Satyagraha” just ended its November run. Now we have footage of Glass’ appearance , filmed by New Yorker music critic Alex Ross. Here’s how Ross described the scene: When the Satyagraha listeners emerged from the Met, police directed them to leave via side exits, but protesters began encouraging them to disregard the police, walk down the steps, and listen to Glass speak. Hesitantly at first, then in a wave, they did so. The composer proceeded to recite the closing lines of Satyagraha, which come from the Bhagavad-Gita (after 3:00 in the video above): “When righteousness withers away and evil rules the land, we come into being, age after age, and take visible shape, and move, a man among men, for the protection of good, thrusting back evil and setting virtue on her seat again.” True to form, he said it several times, with the “human microphone” repeating after him. Lou Reed and Laurie Anderson were in attendance, and at one point Reed helped someone crawl over the barricade that had been set up along the sidewalk. Glass’ “Satyagraha,” written in 1979, links Gandhian non-violence to the civil disobedience of Martin Luther King, both trenchant movements in light of the growing antagonism between OWS protests and police forces. You can read a post Glass wrote for us on the timeliness of his opera’s message here , and watch footage of the Lincoln Center gathering below (as Ross wrote, Glass’ speech starts 3 minutes in). WATCH : [via NPR , kottke.org )

Read the full article →

This Is The Future Of Spotify

December 1, 2011

Spotify announced a new look and a bunch of new apps for its desktop music player at a classy event in New York City on Wednesday, and the early returns look great. The new Spotify integrates with several music recommendation engines , album review sites and social sharing platforms with the aim of making listening to music on Spotify a more substantial and rich experience. Below, we’ve collected screenshots of nine new features and apps from the updated Spotify player ( available now in beta and coming soon to your desktop). Here’s what you can expect in your Spotify future:

Read the full article →

Occupy DC To Target Democratic Fundraiser

November 30, 2011

WASHINGTON — The Washington arm of the Occupy Wall Street movement plans to target a high-dollar Democratic fundraiser near the group’s McPherson Square encampment Thursday night. The cost of attending the dinner for the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee is a pricey $5,000 to $75,000 a plate. “This elitist event is indicative of how the Democrats represent a major part of our government’s failure to represent 99% of its citizenry,” reads an Occupy DC action alert. By marching on the Frontline Member Holiday Reception, the protesters seek to send a message to the Democratic Party that its reliance on corporate contributions makes it part of the problem — or all the problems. “Between 2009 and 2011, Democrats controlled both houses of Congress and the White House. In that time, unemployment reached its highest level since the Great Depression,” the alert states. “The big banks that crashed the global economy were not broken up, and are still ‘too big to fail.’ Taxes on the extremely wealthy stayed low. Health care and financial reform were deeply flawed, handicapped by lobbyist influence. Promises to take action on climate change, immigration reform, and anti-worker labor laws were forgotten. Wars expanded and dragged on. Banks got bailed out, while crushing debt burdens on American households have still not been relieved. Now, 15 Senate Democrats have voted against the Udall Amendment to the 2012 National Defense Authorization Act — essentially voting to dissolve habeas corpus in this country.” A Democratic operative, responding to the action alert, noted that there may be a political upside: Republicans will have a harder time accusing Washington Democrats of orchestrating the Occupy movement. Read the entire alert: ACTION Alert – Occupy DCCC: Let no party remain unaccountable to the people Posted on November 30th, 2011 What – Occupy DCCC When – 5 PM, Thursday, December 1 Where – Gathering at McPherson Square, marching to 727 15th St NW On the two-month anniversary of Occupy DC representing the voices and interests of the 99%, we will march on a Democratic Party fundraiser charging $5,000-$75,000 per dinner. This elitist event is indicative of how the Democrats represent a major part of our government’s failure to represent 99% of its citizenry. The party is part and parcel of a government in which about half of congressional members and most major presidential candidates are 1%ers — a government of the 1%, by the 1% and for the 1%. Because no party is representing the 99%, and because money should never equal speech, we are marching on a fundraiser for the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee. Between 2009 and 2011, Democrats controlled both houses of Congress and the White House. In that time, unemployment reached its highest level since the Great Depression. The big banks that crashed the global economy were not broken up, and are still “too big to fail.” Taxes on the extremely wealthy stayed low. Health care and financial reform were deeply flawed, handicapped by lobbyist influence. Promises to take action on climate change, immigration reform, and anti-worker labor laws were forgotten. Wars expanded and dragged on. Banks got bailed out, while crushing debt burdens on American households have still not been relieved. Now, 15 Senate Democrats have voted against the Udall Amendment to the 2012 National Defense Authorization Act — essentially voting to dissolve habeas corpus in this country. It has become increasingly clear that the Democratic Party is fundamentally compromised by its reliance on corporate funding. The DCCC is a vehicle for the 1 percent’s influence in the Democratic Party and in America as a whole. It has received nearly $4 million in donations from the financial industry already this election cycle. Rep. Steve Israel, the chair of the committee and its top fundraiser, has received more support from the financial sector than from any other source, and his top donor is the war-machine producing defense contractor Northrop Grumman. The minimum donation for the event on Thursday is $5,000 and the maximum is $75,000 — when candidates are getting such lavish donations from wealthy individuals and corporate-sponsored political action committees, how can we expect them to attend to the needs of the 99 percent? We will only attain true democracy in this country when our government represents not the American dollar, but the American people. We will always stand against pay-to-play politics and legalized bribery in government.

Read the full article →

Zipcar Debuts Brand-New Pilot Program — Only In San Francisco

November 30, 2011

Car sharing service Zipcar has already fundamentally changed the way hundreds of thousands of people across North America and the United Kingdom get around. Now, the Cambridge, Mass.-based firm plans to directly challenge truck rental companies like U-Haul with a new pilot program launching in San Francisco offering van rentals in addition to its normal car rental options. The company will being offering Ford E-150 cargo vans for $14.75 per hour and just under $100 per day. Unlike many other rental companies, Zipcar doesn’t charge extra for fuel or insurance. The appropriately named Zipvan service will lunch early next year with 15 vehicles available at selected locations in both San Francisco and Oakland. If the program proves successful, the company plans to expand it to other cities across the country over the next year. The company already offers vans in the the U.K though a similar company it acquired there called Streetcar; however, San Francisco is the first city in the United States or Canada to get the vans. “Based on the success we’ve seen in London and the enthusiasm from our members expressed through our Zipcar member survey, we’re thrilled to launch this pilot in San Francisco,” said Zipcar CEO Scott Griffith in a press release . “Whether you’re planning a move across town or about to make a new purchase for your apartment or a business with an occasional need for a larger vehicle, transporting large items in the city is a real hassle. Zipvan aims to make it more convenient and more affordable to move stuff around.” In an internal survey taken among its users, Zipcar found that 40 percent of them are interested in the van rentals. The company has long geared its service towards young people and urban dwellers who are naturally comfortable with its online reservation system and often only require an automobile for the occasional trip to the grocery store instead of a daily commute. The New York Times reports : Zipcar has built its business in part by catering to college students who would not meet age requirements for regular car rentals. Consequently, serving the legions of early-twentysomethings moving in and out of dorms could help it compete in the van-rental market. Budget tacks on a daily surcharge of $18 for those aged 21 to 23 years old. No such fee applies for Zipvan rentals. The company boasts over 650,000 members who use approximately 9,500 of its vehicles. Check out this video of Zipcar’s co-founder talking about how the company’s pricing model changes the way individuals interact with their urban environment:

Read the full article →

GOP Threatening Middle Class: Dems

November 30, 2011

WASHINGTON — Democrats and labor leaders went on the offensive against anti-union House Republicans Wednesday, accusing GOP members and business groups of threatening the country’s middle class through a raft of legislation that could weaken unions. At a forum hosted by the AFL-CIO, Sen. Tom Harkin (D-Iowa) argued that Republican efforts to strip power from the National Labor Relations Board, the federal agency that enforces labor law, were part of a broader attack on collective bargaining rights across the country. The fight, he added, was ultimately about “fairness and equity” in the economy. “We’ve got to quit being on the defensive,” Harkin said. “We have to take our case to the American people … attacking [Republicans] for what they’re trying to do. The American people are starting to understand how unfair the economic system is, how unfair it is for banks and the wealthy to get all the government largesse and for working people to get nothing.” The remarks from Harkin and others came just hours before the House passed one of several bills designed to limit the powers of the labor board, which Republicans have lambasted as overly sympathetic to unions and harmful to businesses during the Obama era. The GOP-sponsored Workforce Democracy and Fairness Act would scuttle a rule recently put forth by the labor board that would streamline the union election process and likely make it easier for workers to join unions. Bill co-sponsor Rep. John Kline (R-Minn.) has claimed the board’s rule would lead to “ambush elections” by unions, while supporters of the rule say it would merely remove red tape and give employers less time to pressure workers against unionization. The Republican measure enjoyed broad support from business heavyweights such as the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, the National Retail Federation, and the American Hotel & Lodging Association, though the legislation is unlikely to go far in the Democrat-controlled Senate. In addition to holding four congressional hearings this year on what they’ve described as NLRB overreach, House Republicans have gone so far as to propose legislation that would strip the board of its powers or defund it entirely. Many GOP members were hoping that Brian Hayes, currently the board’s lone Republican, would resign in order to kill the board’s quorum and essentially shut it down. Hayes said Wednesday that he did not intend to. At the AFL-CIO event, Rep. George Miller (D-Calif.) said that the attacks on the labor board coming from Republicans are unlike anything he’s seen “in all my time in public life.” “They have decided they don’t want the collective bargaining process to continue in this country,” Miller said. “This isn’t some tinkering … it’s about ending this agency. [Labor law] is the basic fundamental economic underpinning of the middle class in this country. It’s the wages and benefits of the working people.” In a reference to the Occupy Wall Street protests, Miller added, “That’s why you see tents around this city and this country asking for shared sacrifice.” The forum at the AFL-CIO coincided with the release of a report on Republicans and the NLRB from the Center for American Progress Action Fund, the lobbying arm of the well-known progressive think tank. Arguing that the American middle class has weakened as union ranks have thinned in recent decades, the report asserts that “House Republicans are using every tool available to them — including their budget, regulatory, and legislative-oversight powers — to wage a coordinated attack on workers’ rights by trying to eviscerate the National Labor Relations Board.” The GOP’s feud with the labor board started back in the spring, when the NLRB’s general counsel, Lafe Solomon, filed a complaint against the Boeing Company. The complaint alleged that the aerospace giant broke labor law when it established a production line for its 787 Dreamliner in South Carolina. Solomon claimed that the move amounted to retaliation against Boeing’s unionized workers in Washington state for having gone on strike in the past. The complaint put Boeing’s plans in South Carolina on hold, but on Wednesday Boeing and the union reached a contract agreement that could resolve the complaint. Although many labor experts say the complaint was not unusual, Republicans have portrayed it as an abuse of power, arguing that it will have a chilling effect on businesses. They said the same of the union election rules put forth by the labor board. In a discussion of the election rules on the House floor Wednesday, Rep. Tim Walberg (R-Mich.) said that the NLRB has “taken actions that directly oppose American job providers,” adding that “job creators are terrified of the NLRB’s actions.” The bill passed Wednesday would assure that no union election could take place within fewer than 35 days after a union has gathered enough signatures for a formal petition. Union backers argue that such a guarantee would give management more time to employ union-busting tactics, while Republicans said they simply want to give workers more time to get information. Kline said that workers “shouldn’t be deprived of the opportunity to make an informed decision. When the labor board announced the streamlined rules earlier this year, then-chairwoman Wilma Liebman said the board was merely hoping to resolve “representation questions quickly, fairly, and accurately.”

Read the full article →

Fate Of WebOS Will Be Decided Shortly

November 30, 2011

Hewlett-Packard CEO Meg Whitman just gave an interview to Le Figaro, a French newspaper, saying that a decision on what to do with HP’s webOS software will come within the next two weeks.

Read the full article →

Dean Garfield: Stop Scapegoating Tech

November 29, 2011

The Washington Post ‘s article “Cloud Centers Bring High-tech Flash, but Not Many Jobs to Beaten-down Towns” is simply sophomoric silliness masquerading as sophisticated news. The article weaves together a series of anecdotes to paint a picture that conveniently supports its premise: technology and the resulting productivity growth is a source of unemployment — particularly in the manufacturing sector. The inconvenient truth is that the facts contradict this story. Those who have spent time studying the issue, including a definitive report from the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), conclude that “more rapid productivity growth leads to higher rather than lower employment in manufacturing.” The NBER study has been supported by economists at the Federal Reserve who write that, “a positive technology shock leads to a reduction in the unemployment rate that persists for several years, and likewise by the OECD in a definitive review of the studies on productivity and employment, Jobs Study: Facts, Analysis, Strategy. That report concluded that, technology “generally destroys lower wage, lower productivity jobs, while it creates jobs that are more productive, high-skill and better paid. Historically, the income-generating effects of new technologies have proved more powerful than the labor-displacing effects: technological progress has been accompanied not only by higher output and productivity, but also by higher overall employment.” It is true that for individual companies or industries, technology and higher productivity growth may lead to a loss of jobs. For example, there was a significant decline in employment in the typewriter manufacturing industry following the advent of the personal computer, but the spin-off benefits — employment and otherwise — from the PC industry are beyond dispute. We are saddened by the slow job creation in the U.S. but it is against our best interest to scapegoat the technology sector. The cause of lower employment over the last decade, including in the manufacturing sector, is not technology and higher productivity growth in the United States. Rather, the source is likely to be higher productivity growth, and more pronounced price declines, among foreign manufacturers that compete with U.S. companies. In China in particular, productivity has been rising and costs have been declining more rapidly than in the United States — particularly in industries such as consumer electronics and apparel, where China did not compete with the United States two decades ago. It is this loss of U.S. global competitiveness that is principal cause of anemic job growth. What the U.S. economy needs to restore job growth is a commitment to a national action plan focused on driving growth and creating jobs through making investments in basic research, science education, and R&D; enforcing our trade agreements and boosting our exports; lowering effective corporate tax rates; improving physical and digital infrastructure; and embracing the power of technology (particularly IT) to transform and to make more efficient entire sectors of the economy. The evidence is clear: technology is part of the job creation solution, not part of the problem. For more on this, look for the Information Technology Industry Foundation’s upcoming report on “America’s Competitiveness Crisis and the Anemic Job Recovery.”

Read the full article →

Steven Strauss: Actually, Despite GOP Claims — the U.S. Isn’t Over-regulated

November 29, 2011

The GOP presidential candidates believe, as an article of faith, that the United States is an overly-regulated society. They want to eliminate “unnecessary” regulations and even entire regulatory agencies to, in their view, unleash the growth potential of American business. Governor Perry wants to eliminate 3 federal regulatory agencies (2 he named; one whose name he couldn’t remember), Ron Paul wants to eliminate 5 agencies, and so on ( Republican Presidential Debate , November 9th 2011). The GOP candidates claim that the U.S. regulatory environment is not competitive with that of our peer group, and risks losing jobs to other countries. Still another article of faith among GOP candidates is that the regulatory scheme has worsened under President Obama. I describe these as “articles of faith”, because to my knowledge — they have not shown any non-partisan research, or international benchmarks, to demonstrate that our overall regulatory environment is particularly burdensome. Leaving aside the GOP candidates’ anecdotal views, it is helpful to examine real data that compares the U.S. regulatory burden with that of our peer group. The World Bank conveniently prepares an Ease of Doing Business Index (Index) whereby: ‘Economies are ranked on their ease of doing business, from 1 – 183. A high ranking on the ease of doing business index means the regulatory environment is more conducive to the starting and operation of a local firm. This index averages the country’s percentile rankings on 10 topics, made up of a variety of indicators, giving equal weight to each topic. The rankings for all economies are benchmarked to June 2011.’ As with any index of this nature, this Index is not a perfect proxy for each country’s actual level of regulatory burden. Nonetheless, it is a good indicator of how the U.S. compares to its peer group and to a list of 183 other countries. The Index examines: starting a business, protecting investors, enforcing contracts, among other relevant topics. The Index data can be sorted three ways: 1. Large Countries (List 1 below): I view this as our peer group. In this category, the U.S. is the easiest country where one can do business. 2. High Income Countries (List 2 below): In this category, the U.S. is the fourth easiest for doing business, behind several much smaller high-income countries. 3. All Countries (List 3 below, including many under-developed countries): Again, the U.S. ranks fourth. The World Bank Index samples 10 regulatory categories, so is not exhaustive across all regulations. But it clearly shows that overall — we are among the easiest of countries in which to conduct business, particularly when compared with our peers. As for the Obama administration’s performance, a recent General Accounting Office study found no particular increase in the regulatory burden by comparison with the preceding Bush administration ( Bloomberg News , ‘Obama Wrote 5% Fewer Rules Than Bush’, October 25, 2011). Finally, an additional interesting piece of data comes from a recent survey of high net worth entrepreneurs in China — 60% of which are considering emigrating, most to the U.S. The reasons cited include: the strength of the American regulatory system — and the resulting safety of our food, environment, workplace, etc. ( Bloomberg Business Week ,’China’s Super-Rich Buy a Better Life Abroad’, November 22, 2011). Not every regulation or law in the U.S. is perfect; not every regulator is a paragon of virtue. We can all name individual failures. Certainly, we should strive, as a country, to be the best we can be, and compare ourselves against international standards. But we cannot make our economy stronger or more competitive by making judgments and major structural changes based on faith — rather than reality. The data collected for the U.S. and its peer group — over several years — does not show that the U.S. has a systematically bad regulatory environment. But if we eliminate several major regulators (e.g., EPA) we: a) Will likely make our country significantly less safe, less healthy, and more unpleasant, b) Won’t improve our international competitiveness, and c) May actually dissuade foreign investors from coming to the U.S. What do you think? List 1: Large Countries Ranked for Ease of Doing Business (Top 5) 1. U.S. 2. UK 3. Republic of Korea 4. Saudi Arabia 5. Canada List 2: High Income Countries Ranked for Ease of Doing Business (Top 5) 1. Singapore 2. Hong Kong 3. New Zealand 4. U.S. 5. Denmark List 3: All Countries Ranked for Ease of Doing Business (Top 5) 1. Singapore 2. Hong Kong 3. New Zealand 4. U.S. 5. Denmark Steven Strauss was founding Managing Director of the Center for Economic Transformation at the New York City Economic Development Corporation. He will be an Advanced Leadership Fellow at Harvard University for 2011-2012. He has a Ph.D. in Management from Yale University. Follow him on Twitter @steven_strauss.

Read the full article →

Man Returns Money He Stole In The 1940s

November 29, 2011

SEATTLE — The manager of the Sears store in downtown Seattle says an elderly man has repaid – with interest – cash the man says he stole in the late 1940s. The note said the man stole $20 to $30 from a cash register decades ago and wanted to pay back $100. Manager Gary Lorentson says he thinks the man’s conscience “has been bothering him for the past 60 years.” Store security cameras recorded the man, but Sears officials said they don’t know who he is and they won’t release the video. The store plans to put the money toward helping needy families in the holiday season. ___

Read the full article →