fundamentals

menafn.com…

Tempting Risk Reversals but Fundamentals Don’t Support the Move

Visit link:
Tempting Risk Reversals but Fundamentals Don’t Support the Move

Find our Weekly Commercial Real Estate, Private Equity and Fund Newsletters at www.WeeklyBrief.net

menafn.com…

AUDUSD and S&P 500 at the Verge of Major Reversals but Fundamentals Complicate the Situation

Read the original here:
AUDUSD and S&P 500 at the Verge of Major Reversals but Fundamentals Complicate the Situation

Find our Weekly Commercial Real Estate, Private Equity and Fund Newsletters at www.WeeklyBrief.net

Michael Martin: The Inconvenient Truth of Vermont’s Oil Speculation

May 3, 2011

Sen. Bernie Sanders wrote an open letter to the President about high oil prices, according to a Huffington Post article ” Bernie Sanders Demands Action From Obama on Wall St. Oil ‘Gambling’” written by Zach Carter. “Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) demanded on Thursday that regulators impose limits on oil speculation to help lower the price of gas in a letter sent to President Obama. ‘There is mounting evidence that the skyrocketing price of gas and oil has nothing to do with the fundamentals of supply and demand, and has everything to do with Wall Street firms that are artificially jacking up the price of oil in the energy futures markets,’” Mr. Carter reported. In the current regulatory environment, the Green Mountain State is included in those who are defined a speculators. They provide the corpus — the money — as investments in hedge funds and commodity indices. In effect, Sen. Sanders is mad with the labor unions and civil service employee retirement plans — the largest investors in the asset class known as Managed Futures — what some like to call speculators. I said as much during a television interview on Good Friday: Watch the latest video at video.foxbusiness.com With a little digging (on Google), I found documents that show that the $2.5 billion Vermont Pension fund has a 2 percent allocation to commodities . Vermont’s Pension Investment Committee approved the allocation circa October 2009. Vermont’s initial allocation to commodities at 2 percent, top bar on the far right. Vermont’s positions as of Year-End 2010 hit 2.3 percent, middle bar, far right. Vermont’s commodity investment is through the DJ-UBS Commodity Index , which has a whopping 34 percent allocation to energy futures, with 24 percent of it in crude oil, heating oil, and gasoline. The crude oil allocation is 16 percent alone. The Index holds a 29 percent long allocation in agriculture futures. Vermont has ridden crude oil all the way up from about $66 to its current level of $112 per barrel … a 100 percent increase. A 2 percent allocation might not seem like a lot, but that means that Vermont’s pension controls upwards of 78,000 barrels of crude oil, just like the speculators that the Senator admonishes in his ranting letter to the President. When you add in the collective activity of other state pensions, the situation seems much more grave. Since Vermont’s investment is long-only, they do nothing but buy crude oil and, if you believe what you’ve read, drive up the prices on the citizens of Vermont where, in Sen. Sanders own words “It is not uncommon for people to commute 100 miles to work and back five days a week, the increased price of gas is taking a serious bite out of the paychecks of middle class families.” I don’t believe that buying commodity futures changes the price of the physical product. (Only OPEC can redirect America’s xenophobia and turn it into a backlash onto itself.) Furthermore, their investment index never sells. They keep buying and the more dollars that make their way into Vermont’s pension system, the more crude oil and energy futures they will buy. If Vermont’s pension grows, so will their allocation to crude oil and to commodity futures. The Role of the Commodity Markets The commodity markets are insurance markets where buyer and seller trade price risk. In order to get paid for taking the risk, there needs to be a premium paid — just like in life insurance. Risk transference and price discovery are the two functions of global auction process in the commodity markets. It goes without saying that the price of crude oil futures trade at a premium to what the forces of supply and demand would dictate solely. In the last week alone, the energy market have had to interpret: Protests in Saudi Arabia against the crackdown in Bahrain. A Unity Deal in Palestine. A horrible U.S. Energy Policy , where the new drilling permits are really the old permits that were put on hold by President Obama in light of the Gulf oil disaster. The effect of the Environmental/Green Movement in getting new oil drilling blocked. (Per the video, I’m for higher gas prices if it benefits the environment.) A Department of Energy (DOE) that will burn through 30 billion this year alone. A DOE that since 1977 has not discovered a single drop of oil, nor that has helped us stave off peak oil. The death of OBL . Responsibility The Senator continued: “We have a responsibility to do everything we can to lower gas prices so that they reflect the fundamentals of supply and demand and bring needed relief to the American people at the gas pump are driving.” I couldn’t agree more with Sen. Sanders. That’s why I’m calling on Vermont’s pension and all pensions across the country to divest of their entire commodity allocations and to stop driving up the prices of energy on the citizens of Vermont and the U.S. at large … and then blaming themselves. It’s not logical for sitting Senators to do that. I’d also encourage them to take a class on financial literacy. Their understanding of commodity markets and of their own investments is lacking. I hope you all understand that I’m being entirely facetious, and that Vermont is no more a speculator than the little old lady from Pasadena who wants protection from the bumper crop of dollars the Federal Government has printed. The “hedge funds” as they’re referred to, cater to labor unions, civil service pensions, municipalities, and university endowments, primarily because they can meet the $10 – $25 million account minimum investment that go along with these large hedge funds (they are called Commodity Pools specifically). It’s safe to say that the majority of the beneficiaries of these entities are not known for being Republican… The Managed Futures asset class is invaluable to these institutional investors as it lowers the overall risk to their combined portfolios and enhances their returns. This is before the pensions and civil service benefit plans address what is known as Longevity Risk — the risk that comes with beneficiaries living much longer than the actuarial tables calculated for. Although it’s not the thrust of this article, it’s a giant risk to them and to the beneficiaries who are counting on those monthly checks. Where the Real Risks Are Besides terrorism, one of the real risks to the overall markets are the high-frequency traders who caused the Flash Crash. Based on Barron’s columnist Jim McTague’s new book Crapshoot Investing , neither Chairman Mary Shapiro and the SEC, nor Chairman Gary Gensler and the CFTC have any literal understanding of what is going on in the markets each day. The SEC and the CFTC rely on the exchanges for direction, but the exchanges are in bed with the HFT traders who pay enormous fees (sometimes as much as $50,000/month) for privileged data and speed. I think this issue is much more an immediate concern than trying to decide if we should limit Vermont or other municipalities individual or collective positions sizes in crude oil. But then again, we are into election season … Trade-offs Under the current understanding of asset allocation and investment finance, it is possible that we will pay more at the pump for gasoline and more at the grocery store for food due to global risks as perceived by commodity indexers and other commodity investors. I do not begrudge a labor union, a civil service/state retirement plan, nor a college/university endowment the opportunity to get better returns and lower risk for their beneficiaries by having investments in managed futures (even if it means I have to pay higher prices). I commend Vermont’s Investment Committee for making such an investment. They are forward thinkers. I’ll be Tweeting from the Milken Global Conference this week with the hashtag #GC2011. Michael Martin’s book The Inner Voice of Trading will be out in October.

Read the full article →

Jack Myers: Content Producers and Owners Turn the Table on Aggregators

April 19, 2011

It’s no longer about using technology to aggregate content. It’s about using content to aggregate technology. If there was one common theme at both this year’s CES and at last week’s National Association of Broadcasters Convention in Las Vegas, it is the shift in emphasis away from advances in TV technology and distribution to how content producers are being recognized as the monetization engines for technology companies. For the past five to six decades, the TV industry has handled content as a commoditized product (with occasional hits) to be aggregated, packaged and sold to distributors, advertisers and audiences. The digital media business has followed the same pattern, with investors, advertisers, agencies, media companies and developers all reducing the role of content to a tertiary player in the ecosystem. Invite the top 100 venture capital investors to invest in a content start-up, and more than 90 will advise they “don’t invest in content.” What they should admit is that they are ignorant about the fundamentals of the media and advertising business, locked into an outdated paradigm, and blind to the hottest growth sector of media and advertising for the next decade. Google’s acquisition of YouTube and NextNewNetworks acknowledges that reality. Ask 100 media buyers to identify their clients’ #1 priority, the answer has almost always been “reaching key audiences as efficiently as possible.” The biggest issue in the industry for the past half-decade: procurement ! But for the next five decades, the central-point of investment opportunity in both digital and legacy media will be content and context — not technology, and not content aggregation. Content creators and developers now have the ability to shop in a warehouse over-stocked with software tools and resources that enable them to build out their digital distribution models across all platforms. Free, cheap and ubiquitous tools are available for mobile apps, interactivity, group deals and commerce, social connections, ad management, advanced TV, performance measurement and pretty much any capability content producers may require to scale their businesses. Venture capital investors with deep pockets continue to fund one tech start-up after the other, all chasing advertiser dollars and consumer eyeballs. They, along with huge global CE manufacturers LG, Intel, Samsung, Panasonic, Sony and others are now all focusing on chasing content partners. It was inevitable that content would find its way to the center of this discussion. It’s no longer about technology tools aggregating and monetizing content. It’s about branded content producers aggregating and monetizing technology. Jack Myers can be reached at Jack@mediadvisorygroup.com . JackMyersThinkTank is free and underwritten, as part of MediaBizBloggers.com , by subscriptions to Jack Myers Media Business Report ( www.jackmyers.com ). Subscribe free to all MediaBizBloggers reports at www.MediaBizBloggers . For Jack Myers Media Business Report subscription information visit www.myersreport.com or contact Jack Myers at Jack@mediadvisorygroup.com . Jack Myers and Media Advisory Group provide details on all underwriters and companies in which we have an investment at www.jackmyers.com . This commentary was originally posted at www.jackmyers.com.

Read the full article →

Short-Term Fundamentals Once Again Attempting to Fuel Risk Aversion Flows

April 18, 2011

Short-Term Fundamentals Once Again Attempting to Fuel Risk Aversion Flows

Read the full article →

Dollar Still at a 15-Month Low Despite Improved Fundamentals

April 16, 2011

Dollar Still at a 15-Month Low Despite Improved Fundamentals

Read the full article →

Longer-Term Fundamentals and Yield Differentials Continue to Drive Markets

April 6, 2011

Longer-Term Fundamentals and Yield Differentials Continue to Drive Markets

Read the full article →

Longer-Term Fundamentals and Yield Differentials Continue to Drive Markets

April 6, 2011

Longer-Term Fundamentals and Yield Differentials Continue to Drive Markets

Read the full article →

How Unemployment Is Dragging Down The Housing Market

March 25, 2011

Although the United States population has grown by 120 million people in the past fifty-odd years, today’s new homes are selling at just half the pace they were in 1963. Home sales are being dragged down by the weakness of the labor market and the number of Americans who have grown too discouraged to look for work, economists say. In previous recoveries, the housing market has sometimes buoyed the economy, creating new jobs and driving economic growth. This time, however, the housing market is now lagging behind. Over at Mish’s Global Economic Trend Analysis, a new chart helps bring employment into the housing story by comparing the ratio of annual new home sales to the size of the civilian labor force. See the chart below. The point is simple: while the working age population is steadily rising, the size of the labor force is actually shrinking. And those Americans who have grown so discouraged that they have given up looking for work — around 4.9 million as of last month — are unlikely to be in the market for a house. With construction for new homes all but coming to a halt in February, Americans are on track to buy fewer new homes than in any year since the government began keeping data almost a half-century ago. Mish lays out the problems, as he sees it: • Those not in the labor force are not looking • Those unemployed are not looking • Those afraid of losing their job are not looking • Those in a house and underwater are not looking • Those just out of school and deep in school debt are not looking • Those facing retirement may be looking to sell or downsize • Mortgage standards are much tighter for those who are looking Economists, however, are hard pressed to tie down the exact relationship between a slumping housing market and a weak labor market. “It’s very hard to zero-in in that way,” said Bank of America-Merrill Lynch economist Michelle Meyer. “But one of the major components for why housing demand has remained very soft is because the labor market is very weak. And until we see that really changing, housing sales will continue to be soft.” The more significant problem, for Meyer, is how these two factors taken together — housing and unemployment — indicate an economy still in trouble. “When you think about new home sales, and housing specifically, that obviously ties to what share of Americans are participating in the labor force,” Meyer said. “But you can’t really say that because the labor force shrunk by X amount there is this many fewer homes needed. To me, it’s more of a signal that the fact that the labor force is weak. And that at this point in the recovery, people are still leaving the labor force — that signals to me that the fundamentals are soft.” Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke has said that it will likely take five years for the unemployment rate to return to pre-recession levels, while a recent report from the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco concluded that the unemployment rate, now hovering around 9 percent, may never return to pre-recession levels. Here is the chart from Mish’s Global Economic Trend Analysis, comparing annualized new home sales to the civilian labor force ratio, year over year. (Click image for more detail). More graphs over at Mish’s can be found here .

Read the full article →

A EURUSD Reversal Now would be Speculative, But Fundamentals Quickly Firming

March 8, 2011

A EURUSD Reversal Now would be Speculative, But Fundamentals Quickly Firming

Read the full article →

Dan Solin: Clueless

February 9, 2011

I’m sure Pat Dorsey is highly intelligent and very competent. He is the director of equity research for Morningstar, which is a big job that gives him access to vast resources about the stock and bond markets. As he noted in an article published January 17, 2010 in Money Magazine ‘s Investor’s Guide 2010 entitled “10 stocks that can keep running,” the analysts he works with at Morningstar cover 2000 stocks. Wow. With such an impressive background and extensive resources, I am sure many investors paid close attention to Mr. Dorsey’s 2010 predictions about stock market trends. His primary observation was that we were in the “first phase of a bull market” where “smaller and junkier stocks tend to lead the way.” However, he confidently predicted that “…speculative frenzy eventually gives way to the fundamentals, and that should bring your focus back to high-quality blue-chip stocks this year.” He was very negative on “lower-quality small stocks” noting they could “get killed if reality falls short of high expectations.” Many investors no doubt dumped their small stocks and focused on blue chips. After all, Mr. Dorsey is the director of equity research at Morningstar. Presumably he can accurately predict whether large or small stocks will outperform in a given year. Not exactly. In a thoughtful analysis not available to the investing public, Weston J. Wellington, vice president of Dimensional Fund Advisors noted that US small stocks had their best year since 2003. The S&P Small Cap 600 index was up 26.31%, compared to an increase of 15.06% in the S&P 500. It gets worse. Wellington did an analysis of the ten blue chip stocks recommended by Mr. Dorsey and found they had an average return of 6.3% , significantly under-performing the S&P 500 index. Let’ see if I got this right. Mr. Dorsey was dead wrong in his prediction that blue-chips would outperform small stocks in 2010. His selection of blue-chips did not come close to the returns that were yours for the taking by investing in the comparable index. Yet investors continue to rely on the financial media which features pundits of all stripes, confidently predicting the direction of the markets and advising you to buy this or that stock. It’s all errant nonsense, akin to voodoo, designed to separate you from your money and to continue the transfer of wealth from you to those who “manage” your money. Mr. Dorsey, and his colleagues who pretend to be able to predict random, future events, may be clueless. You don’t have to be. The views set forth in this blog are the opinions of the author alone and may not represent the views of any firm or entity with whom he is affiliated. The data, information, and content on this blog are for information, education, and non-commercial purposes only. Returns from index funds do not represent the performance of any investment advisory firm. The information on this blog does not involve the rendering of personalized investment advice and is limited to the dissemination of opinions on investing. No reader should construe these opinions as an offer of advisory services. Readers who require investment advice should retain the services of a competent investment professional. The information on this blog is not an offer to buy or sell, or a solicitation of any offer to buy or sell any securities or class of securities mentioned herein. Furthermore, the information on this blog should not be construed as an offer of advisory services. Please note that the author does not recommend specific securities nor is he responsible for comments made by persons posting on this blog.

Read the full article →

Ian Fletcher: Bipartisan Cluelessness in Republican Response to Obama State of the Union

January 27, 2011

Economic cluelesslness, it seems, is now an equal-opportunity employer. There have been times in American history — 1932, 1980 — when there were good arguments for picking one side or the other, but having heard Rep. Paul Ryan’s response to Obama’s State of the Union address, I don’t know who’s worse. Bachmann began with a big long whine about — quelle horreur! — deficit spending, as if it were 1920 and the Keynesian insight that governments need to spend their way out of recession had never occurred: Unfortunately, instead of restoring the fundamentals of economic growth, he engaged in a stimulus spending spree that not only failed to deliver on its promise to create jobs, but also plunged us even deeper into debt. The facts are clear: Since taking office, President Obama has signed into law spending increases of nearly 25% for domestic government agencies – an 84% increase when you include the failed stimulus. All of this new government spending was sold as “investment.” Yet after two years, the unemployment rate remains above 9% and government has added over $3 trillion to our debt. While he’s narrowly right about unemployment being stuck , the disappointment is that he’s just as unaware as Obama that the reason the traditional cure hasn’t worked is that America’s huge deficit has caused so much of that stimulus to leak abroad, not get recycled in our own economy. Boy, did we stimulate Guandong! And this deficit is due to America (thought not China or most of Europe) practicing free trade. As for Republican worries about the Federal debt, what about America’s vast foreign debt which grows every year as we borrow abroad (and sell off existing assets) to import more than we export? Rising indebtedness is apparently OK for Republicans so long as multinational corporations profit from it. One weeps for the republic. We need a clear partisan choice on an issue as important as free trade, not Tweedledum-Tweedledee economics.

Read the full article →

Dan Dorfman: Big Gold Pop Apt to Follow Gold Drop

January 20, 2011

Even Superman has his bad days. We saw that last Sunday when the New England Patriots, widely viewed as the Superman of football, were beaten by the underdog New York Jets. We saw it again in recent months when gold, the investment arena’s Superman, switched from the man of steel to a powder puff after racking up 10 straight years of gains (30% last year) during which it shot up more than six fold from $228 an ounce in 2001 to a recent all-time high in early December of $1,432.50. But since then, the yellow metal, which is looking quite toppy,has backtracked to around $1,350. This decline, though hardly awesome, has led to a series of warnings, such as “the gold bubble is about to burst” and “a collapse in gold is imminent.” One of the country’s dogged trackers of precious metals, a skilled market timer who warned of the recent gold selloff, is online investment adviser, Mark Leibovit, editor of the VR Gold Letter in Sedona, AZ. His latest thoughts: More gold weakness could be in the works into March which might knock down the price 10% to 25% from its recent high (which raises the prospects of a possible drop to as low as roughly $1,070). But after the gold drop, he sees a likely gold pop. The metal, as Leibovit sees it, has to overcome the lack of strong upside volume and the recent resistance to re-establish its short-term uptrend. As a result, he’s sitting on the sidelines insofar as his trading position is concerned. “We always run the risk of a shakeout and where and when it ends is anybody’s guess,” he says. Famed global commodities investor Jim Rogers is also hoisting warning flags, noting that gold is overdue for a rest and is likely headed lower over the short run. Shortly after gold crossed $1,000 an ounce in September of 2009, Leibovit made what I thought was an off-the-wall forecast: “Gold will never again trade below $1,000 an ounce in our lifetime!” he told me. Since the fluctuating metal is on a constant see-saw, how, I wondered, could he be so cocksure about the stability of such a volatile investment? Also in the back of my mind was what George Soros once told me over breakfast many years ago — namely, “owning gold is like playing poker” and who about a year ago described the metal as “the ultimate asset bubble.” Nonetheless, Leibovit is sticking to his guns about his bold forecast. “The wind is at gold’s back,” he says. “We’re in a big 20-year up cycle that has another 10 years to go.” He also views the recent drop in gold as a gift — an opportunity to buy the metal cheaper. Although he holds out the possibility of a near-term drop in gold to around $1,070, he thinks a more realistic low during this period is between $1,250 and $1,300. By year-end, he figures the metal will be trading at a new high of around $1,600, on the way a few years out to between $2,000 and $3,000. He’s also a bull on silver, which he sees rising from its current price of $28.75 to $36 by the end of 2011. Adding to gold’s allure at this juncture, Leibovit points out, are a bevy of worries and demand factors… Chief among them: — Continued quesions about the longevity of the euro. — A near-certain resumption of a sizable decline in the dollar, which Leibovit argues is “terminal over the long term,” in large measure reflecting $80 trillion of funded and unfunded debt that will never be repaid. — The inevitability of higher inflation stemming from 24/7 money printing around the globe and ballooning commodity prices. — Increasing global demand for gold, notably from China and India. — America’s loss of worldwide leadership as the baton is being passed to China, which is in the process of strengthening its military. A cold war between the U.S. and China is inevitable, Leibovit believes. His favorite gold investment is the Central Fund of Canada, which holds gold and silver bullion. He also likes Agnico Gold mines Ltd., Market Vectors Junior Gold Miners ETF and Northern Dynasty. Leibovit’s bottom line on the metal: Don’t let the bubble talk or the recent weakness scare you away. It’s still the best financial bullet vest around because the fundamentals remain so positive that gold in the long run still looks penthouse bound. In brief, gold, looking ahead, still looks golden. What do you think? E-mail me at Dandordan@aol.com.

Read the full article →

USD/JPY Looks to Yields for Direction Will Weak Fundamentals Weigh Further on the Dollar

January 14, 2011

USD/JPY Looks to Yields for Direction Will Weak Fundamentals Weigh Further on the Dollar

Read the full article →

USD/JPY Looks to Yields for Direction Will Weak Fundamentals Weigh Further on the Dollar

January 14, 2011

USD/JPY Looks to Yields for Direction Will Weak Fundamentals Weigh Further on the Dollar

Read the full article →

Canadian Dollar at Risk as Weak Fundamentals Points to BoC Hold

December 3, 2010

Canadian Dollar at Risk as Weak Fundamentals Points to BoC Hold

Read the full article →

Investors Await Economic Fundamentals and Companies Earnings From the U.S. Economy

October 17, 2010

Investors Await Economic Fundamentals and Companies Earnings From the U.S. Economy

Read the full article →

FOMC Signals QE Approaching, While Economic Fundamentals Continue to Signal Ongoing Weakness

October 16, 2010

FOMC Signals QE Approaching, While Economic Fundamentals Continue to Signal Ongoing Weakness

Read the full article →

Major Fundamentals Ahead, as Investors Are Waiting Income, Spending, Inflation, Manufacturing, and Employment Figures

June 27, 2010

Major Fundamentals Ahead, as Investors Are Waiting Income, Spending, Inflation, Manufacturing, and Employment Figures

Read the full article →

Natural Gas Price Spreads Trigger New Amaranth Speculation Energy Markets

June 17, 2010

By Alexander Kwiatkowski and Stephen Voss June 17 (Bloomberg) — Trading patterns in natural-gas futures are fanning speculation of a repeat of the collapse four years ago of U.S. hedge fund Amaranth Advisors LLC. The premium for futures expiring in March 2011 over the April 2011 contract surged to 43.3 cents per million British thermal units June 15 on the New York Mercantile Exchange, the highest level since Feb. 19. The spread was 24.8 cents per million Btu as recently as the end of last week, before jumping more than 50 percent on June 14. The rally came even as U.S. inventories rose to their highest level for this time of year since at least 1993, when the government began collecting data. “This is peculiar behavior given that supplies are currently building at a comfortable pace,” Stephen Schork , president of consultant Schork Group Inc. in Villanova, Pennsylvania, wrote in a report yesterday. “We haven’t seen these particular spreads behave in such a manner since a prominent natural-gas trader morphed a $9 billion hedge fund, Amaranth, into a $3 billion fund in August 2006.” Greenwich, Connecticut-based Amaranth collapsed after losing about $6.6 billion on wrong-way trades in natural-gas futures. It had controlled more than half of the U.S. market for the commodity before it failed, according to a Senate report from June 2007. Amaranth agreed last August to pay $7.5 million to settle allegations from U.S. regulators that it tried to manipulate the market for natural-gas futures. Winter-Spring Bridge The March-April 2011 spread, a benchmark relationship because it covers the period from winter to spring, surged as much as 134 percent this month, according to data from Nymex. An increase of the March premium over April may signal speculators are anticipating tighter winter supplies, which would drive prices higher. “The rally of the spread in such a short period of time indicates that something besides fundamental data is driving it higher,” said Carl Neill , an energy analyst at Risk Management Inc. in Chicago. “Some big specs were really on the wrong side.” Trading volume for the spread jumped to more than 8,000 contracts on both June 14 and June 15, compared with an average 2,604 lots last week, Nymex data show. Traders may also be anticipating the U.S. moratorium on offshore drilling in the Gulf of Mexico following the Deepwater Horizon rig explosion will cut gas supplies, Schork said in a telephone interview yesterday. Alternatively, it may be the result of a single speculator taking a larger-than-normal position contrary to the consensus, he said. Wrong-Bet Possibility “As this trade continues to decouple, then Deepwater Horizon is indeed a paradigm shift,” Schork said. If the spread reverts, “then the fundamentals haven’t changed and we had a lot of people making a bet and it was a wrong bet,” he said. In September 2006, when Amaranth had to reverse its trades, the March-April spread tumbled to as low as 42 cents per million Btu from as high as $2.51 in August. At the time, the spread measured the difference between March 2007 and April 2007 prices. Hedge funds are mostly private pools of capital whose managers participate substantially in the profit from speculation on whether the price of assets will rise or fall. Nymex natural gas for July delivery rose 7.5 cents, or 1.5 percent, to trade at $5.053 per million Btu at 10:25 a.m. London time today, after tumbling 21.1 cents yesterday. Front-month gas futures have declined 9.3 percent this year. To contact the reporters on this story: Alexander Kwiatkowski in London at akwiatkowsk2@bloomberg.net ; Stephen Voss in London at sev@bloomberg.net

Read the full article →

S&ampP 500 Rally Past 200-Day Average May Convince Investors Gains Will Last

June 16, 2010

By Esmé E. Deprez and Kelly Bit June 16 (Bloomberg) — The advance in the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index that sent the gauge above its average level in the last 200 days yesterday may spur more gains as investors become convinced the rally will last. Signs the U.S. economy is expanding pushed the benchmark index for American equities up 2.4 percent to 1,115.23, erasing its loss for the year and exceeding by 6.5 points the level monitored by investors who base trading decisions on chart patterns. The S&P 500 rose near the 200-day mean on June 3 and May 27 before declining as much as 5 percent in the next two days, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. Closing above technical levels can lure buyers who seek to benefit from price momentum, said Michael Nasto , the senior trader at U.S. Global Investors Inc., which manages about $2.5 billion in San Antonio. More investors may be drawn in should the S&P 500 climb 2.5 percent to surpass its 50-day moving average of 1,143. “That we moved through this technical level might give us a little bit of a pop in the coming days,” Nasto said. “It’s a very important inflection point in the absence of any really major economic or geopolitical news. A lot more people than usual are looking at this.” Equities increased yesterday as an 11th straight month of growth in the Federal Reserve Bank of New York’s manufacturing gauge added to evidence the economic rebound is weathering the European debt crisis. The S&P 500 has jumped 6.2 percent since June 7 as concern over European budget deficits eased and investors speculated growth in China and the U.S. will bolster the global recovery. Below Trend The S&P 500 closed below the 200-day average on May 20 for the first time since July 2009 and had remained under the trend line for 16 straight sessions. Its failure to hold above 1,105, the intraday high the day before May’s employment report spurred a 3.4 percent plunge, was cited in the index’s June 14 drop that erased a 1.3 percent rally. Technical levels are affecting markets in the absence of earnings and economic news and take on more influence as traders fixate on them, said Peter Sorrentino , who helps oversee $13.3 billion at Huntington Asset Advisors in Cincinnati. “No one disregards technical analysis now,” said Sorrentino. “If they do so, they do so at their own peril. Technical analysis has become increasingly important because of so much money chasing around. The momentum of money has become more important than the fundamentals beneath it.” Fundamental Catalysts Over longer periods, earnings and valuations will determine the price of stocks, not chart patterns, said Peter Boockvar , equity strategist at Miller Tabak & Co. in New York. “It doesn’t tell me anything,” Boockvar said. “It means nothing about where we’re going from here, just how far we’ve come. I look at technical analysis but I don’t use it for my trading decisions. Breaks above the 200-day moving average can be false breakouts — you can’t look at it in a vacuum.” Analysts project profits for companies in the 2010 will rise 17 percent this year, data compiled by Bloomberg show. The benchmark index fell 8.2 percent in May, its biggest monthly retreat since February 2009. The index trades for 13.7 times forecast profits in 2010, compared with an average of 16.4 since 1954, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. Crossing the 200-day average “doesn’t tell you that this correction is over but I think people would look at it as a plus,” said Michael Shaoul , chairman of Marketfield Asset Management, which oversees $770 million and whose flagship fund beat 97 percent of peers over the last year. “It would set up the test of the next resistance, which most people would say is at the 50-day moving average. I would call it a minor victory.” To contact the reporters on this story: Esmé E. Deprez in New York at edeprez@bloomberg.net ; Kelly Bit in New York at kbit@bloomberg.net .

Read the full article →

Dollar Clears Another Level of Support as Sentiment Heats Up Despite Discouraging Fundamentals

June 16, 2010

Dollar Clears Another Level of Support as Sentiment Heats Up Despite Discouraging Fundamentals

Read the full article →

Bulls on Brink as S&ampP 500 Makes Third Pass at 200-Day Moving-Average Level

June 15, 2010

By Esme E. Deprez and Kelly Bit June 15 (Bloomberg) — The rally in the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index above its average level in the last 200 days is captivating Wall Street for the third time in two weeks. The benchmark gauge for American equities gained as much as 2 percent to 1,111.76 as of 2:55 p.m. in New York, exceeding by 3 points the level considered significant by investors who base trading decisions on chart patterns. The S&P 500 increased to near the 200-day mean on June 3 and May 27 before losing as much as 5 percent in the next two days. Technical levels are affecting trading in the absence of earnings and economic news and take on more influence as traders fixate on them, said Peter Sorrentino , who helps oversee $13.3 billion at Huntington Asset Advisors in Cincinnati. The S&P 500’s failure to hold above 1,105, its intraday high the day before May’s employment report spurred a 3.4 percent plunge, was cited in the index’s drop yesterday as it erased a 1.3 percent early rally. “No one disregards technical analysis now,” said Sorrentino. “If they do so, they do so at their own peril. Technical analysis has become increasingly important because of so much money chasing around. The momentum of money has become more important than the fundamentals beneath it.” Recovery From Plunge The S&P 500 tumbled as much as 14 percent from a 19-month high on April 23 through June 7 as concern grew that Europe’s debt crisis will derail the economic recovery and BP Plc’s leaking well in the Gulf of Mexico triggered the worst oil spill in U.S. history. Equities rallied today as an 11th straight month of growth in the Federal Reserve Bank of New York’s manufacturing gauge added to evidence the economic rebound is weathering the European debt crisis. The S&P 500 has rebounded 5.7 percent since June 7 as concern over European budget deficits eased and investors speculated growth in China and the U.S. will bolster the global recovery. “The bulls are slowly starting to wrestle back control,” Christopher Verrone and Nicholas Bohnsack , technical analysts at Strategas Research Partners in New York, wrote in a note to clients today. More than 50 percent of New York Stock Exchange -listed shares have risen above their 200-day moving averages, Verrone and Bohnsack said. The Dow Jones Transportation Index , Nasdaq Composite Index and Philadelphia Semiconductor Index are among other benchmark gauges that have topped their 200-day moving averages in recent days. ‘It Means Something’ The S&P 500 closed below the 200-day average on May 20 for the first time since July 2009 and remained under the trend line for 16 straight sessions before today. “To the extent of people looking at this, it means something,” said Michael Shaoul , chairman of Marketfield Asset Management, who oversees $770 million and whose flagship fund beat 97 percent of peers over the last year. “It doesn’t tell you that this correction is over, but I think people would look at it as a plus and it would set up the test of the next resistance, which most people would say is at the 50-day moving average.” The S&P 500’s 50-day moving average is 1,143, about 3 percent above today’s level, according to Bloomberg data. To contact the reporters on this story: Esmé E. Deprez in New York at edeprez@bloomberg.net ; Kelly Bit in New York at kbit@bloomberg.net .

Read the full article →

Few Fundamentals from the U.S. Confirmed Recovery is Undergoing, While Markets Fluctuate Heavily on Concerns over Global Growth

June 12, 2010

Few Fundamentals from the U.S. Confirmed Recovery is Undergoing, While Markets Fluctuate Heavily on Concerns over Global Growth

Read the full article →

Penny Herscher: Entrepreneurs — Manage Yourselves!

June 9, 2010

It’s a fact that women entrepreneurs only get 4.2% of the venture funding in the U.S., but the reasons why are more murky — and some would say women hurt themselves with the venture capitalist community by being emotional. I sat on a panel yesterday at the Astia We Own It conference discussing the role of networking in the venture funding process, especially for women. We reviewed academic research on why women get so little of the investment (conclusion: women need to have technical degrees to be viewed as equal — otherwise they are viewed as significantly lower in value — and strong networks are critical for success raising money), we discussed our own experiences (I was the token CEO on the panel, accompanied by an academic, a VC and a senior exec), and then we discussed the intangibles contributing to the shortage of women running high tech, high growth businesses. One of the messages the panel communicated with the audience was that women need to manage themselves — to manage their behavior. As an example, the VC on the panel had four of 31 investments that had been originally funded with women leaders, but in all four cases the female CEO had been removed ultimately for not having the EQ (emotional intelligence) to handle the pressure, the board, and their own behavior in difficult circumstances. The key advice was “Manage Yourself.” In my own world I have been known to say “Get over yourself” to members of my team when they are wrapped around the axle of an emotional issue. I think this message needs to be heard by all entrepreneurs and executives, especially when interfacing with the VC community. Venture capitalists are driven by financial returns. Especially in these tough times when the VC industry is going through major transformation and reduced funds. When you are running a company of any size, there is no room for emotional behavior. Boards look for grace under pressure, confidence when times are tough, and CEOs who know what to do and how to do it. They look for executives who know how to manage themselves. How many times have you sat in a meeting and watched childish behavior unfold? Blaming, emotion, temper or fear take hold of a person at the table — it happens all too often and at all levels of management. And boards have no time for it. I had to learn this lesson myself. I’m a passionate, strong-willed person who had to figure out (often the hard way) how to manage myself. How to be in control, be calm, be confident, be professional no matter how much the critical voice in my head is screaming (and I am still working on it…). As women entrepreneurs, we have to work overtime to beat the stereotype image of being too emotional. Whether fair or not, the perception is out there and not unfounded. The story of the female CEO who was fired and went into the parking lot and keyed the board’s cars is extreme — but true! The VC who told me his firm didn’t fund women CEOs because when they get fired they’ll sue for sexual discrimination is extreme — but true! To get funded as a high-tech entrepreneur, you have to have the fundamentals… a technical degree, a great network who knows your performance and a great idea. But to stay in the job and stay funded, you have to manage yourself all the time and build the confidence in your board and your investors that you are not only running your business well, but also managing the pressure, yourself under pressure, your board, your team and all the intangible relationships that influence how people see you. So it’s all about results… but results are not always enough.

Read the full article →

Canada Inflation and Retail Sales Dominate as U.S. Lacks Fundamentals

May 21, 2010

Canada Inflation and Retail Sales Dominate as U.S. Lacks Fundamentals

Read the full article →

German Investor Confidence Dropped in May as European Debt Crisis Deepened

May 18, 2010

By Jana Randow May 18 (Bloomberg) — German investor confidence fell in May after Europe’s debt crisis deepened, stoking concern about the euro’s future and rattling financial markets. The ZEW Center for European Economic Research in Mannheim said its index of investor and analyst expectations dropped to 45.8 from 53 in April. Economists expected a slide to 47, according to the median of 35 forecasts in a Bloomberg News survey. The index aims to predict developments six months ahead. The euro has slumped 8 percent against the dollar in the past month as a 750 billion-euro ($929 billion) aid package from governments and the European Central Bank’s bond purchases failed to stem speculation that the monetary union could collapse. While ZEW said investors expect fiscal consolidation to damp economic growth, the weaker currency may stimulate exports. Today’s report “illustrates the uncertainty the current sovereign debt crisis and latest market turmoil have created,” said Carsten Brzeski , an economist at ING Group in Brussels and a former European Commission official. “However, up to now, the fundamentals of the German economy have rather improved than worsened.” ZEW’s gauge of the current situation rose to minus 21.6 from minus 33 in April. The euro was little changed at $1.2411 at 11:19 a.m. in Frankfurt. Economic Growth Germany’s economy, Europe’s largest, unexpectedly grew 0.2 percent in the first quarter as rising exports and company investment outweighed a slump in construction caused by the harshest winter in 14 years. Latest data suggest growth accelerated this quarter after building sites reopened with the arrival of spring. Factory orders, industrial production and retail sales all rose in March and the Ifo institute’s measure of business confidence jumped to a two-year high in April. Volkswagen AG, Europe’s largest carmaker, said yesterday that global sales increased 11 percent last month, helped by growing demand in China and the U.S. Germany’s benchmark DAX share index has recovered from a drop earlier this month and is now 3 percent ahead for the year. The Bundesbank forecasts expansion of 1.6 percent in 2010 after the economy contracted 5 percent in 2009, the most since World War II. The fiscal crisis that began with concern about Greece’s budget deficit could curb growth by forcing governments to rein in spending. Increased Risk “The risk that the economic recovery in the European Union — our most important export market — receives a setback has increased because of the financial crisis in Greece,” Ulrich Lehner , president of the German Chemical Association, or VCI, said yesterday. The chemical industry won’t see “any significant growth” in coming months, he said. European investor confidence fell the most in almost two years this month, the Sentix research institute said last week. The euro dropped to $1.2235 yesterday, a four-year low. It has declined more than 18 percent since late November. “The euro has weakened, interest rates are low — those are positive side effects,” said Andreas Scheuerle , an economist at Dekabank in Frankfurt. “Germany is one of the countries affected the least by this crisis. It will move up in the growth league.” To contact the reporter on this story: Jana Randow in Frankfurt at jrandow@bloomberg.net .

Read the full article →

Mall, Shopping Center REITs See Brightening Retail Landscape

May 12, 2010

With consumers spending more at U.S. malls and shopping centers this year, retail REITs reported improved first quarter operating results, stronger store sales and stepped up leasing activity as occupancies, rents and other fundamentals showed signs of…

Read the full article →

Strong Fundamentals Suggest Economic Activity is Rising, While Earnings Boost Confidence in U.S. Markets

April 17, 2010

Strong Fundamentals Suggest Economic Activity is Rising, While Earnings Boost Confidence in U.S. Markets

Read the full article →

Raymond J. Learsy: Gary Gensler of the CFTC: Reformer or Wolf in Moth Eaten Sheep’s Clothing?

March 13, 2010

Much press has been dedicated these past few days to Gary Gensler, Chairman of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) and ex-Goldman Sachs partner. A New York Times article regales us over his apparent transformation from a hard-line acolyte of then Treasury Secretary and former Goldman Chairman Robert Rubin, long an advocate for a ‘hands off government’ over derivatives trading that was to grow to a $300 trillion (I repeat, trillion) runaway market and become an unsupervised, unregulated financial WMD. That, supposedly, was then and this is Gensler now: “Wall Streets interest is not always the same as the public’s interest.” Or, “Wall Street thrives and makes money in inefficient markets, and I am creating efficiencies in the market.” Really? Back in May 2009 Gensler took over the CFTC, an agency that in July 2008 organized an “Interagency Task Force on Commodity Markets” report and, with oil prices scaling $147/bbl, concluded that it “does not support the proposition that speculative activity has systematically driven changes in oil prices.” A conclusion I leave to the reader to determine whose interests were being taken into account. Apost concurrent to Gensler’s confirmation raised the issue that oil prices had increased dramatically from February 2009 lows of $32.70/bbl to $60/bbl in May 2009, causing the likes of the Financial Times to comment that the fundamentals are “weaker, much weaker than current prices imply.” The implications of speculation and/or manipulation were clear, and Gensler at the CFTC would now be in the hot seat. What has happened since? The price of oil has extended its rise from $60/bbl to over $80/bbl, and that with imports of oil down significantly, given that oil storage terminals are full, and having a surprisingly positive impact on our foreign trade balance. Yet irrespective of more than ample supply in the upside down world of oil prices: the more oil there is on the market, the more we pay per barrel. But then Gensler’s CFTC gave us a bright shining moment of an oil industry influenced government’s reversal in form and candor on issues oil. On July 27, 2009 the Wall Street Journal blazoned their headline, “Traders Blamed For Oil Spike,” advising that the CFTC was to issue a report ‘next’ month “suggesting that speculators played a significant role in driving wild price swings in oil prices — a reversal of an earlier CFTC position.” As well that month, the CFTC had announced that it was considering volume limits on energy futures by financial/proprietary traders and tougher information requirements. Almost immediately the good folks on Wall Street energized their K Street lobbying clan to stop the CFTC and their old work mate Gensler in their tracks. We are still waiting for that report! The outrageous dysfunction of the commodity markets and the tepid CFTC oversight continued blithely along. Late in the week of November 9th, 2009 the Energy Information Service announced that oil stocks had surged by 1.762 million barrels, much more than expected, and that the U.S. refineries processing rate sank to 79.7%, the lowest in more than two decades. Against all reason, instead of collapsing prices, the price of oil jumped by $2.50 on the very day of the announcement, eliciting a post , “The CFTC and Department of Energy Snore Away While the Oil Patch Makes Hay” 11.18.09. And so it continues. While Mr. Gensler and his CFTC Vaudeville act continue to fiddle away, the distortion in oil prices is burning a billion dollar hole a day in American consumers pockets (please see “The Billion Dollar Day Extortion: A Somnolent Administration and Dysfunctional Congress’ Gift to the American People” 02.22.10). As for Mr. Gensler, he is now, after all these months calling for some form of federally mandated limits on speculative trading on oil, gas and other energy futures. But don’t hold your breath. It will all be subject to a 90 day comment period. When all is said and done it will be a year or more since Mr. Gensler’s ascension that anything will have been accomplished, if at all, to rein in the distortions being promulgated on the commodity exchanges. In the meantime, billions are being transferred to oil interests from the pockets of American consumers and putting at risk the feeble economic recovery now underway! An apocryphal comment in the NYTimes article refers to Gensler’s time at the Treasury when asked to investigate derivatives held by South Korean Banks and being “amazed at how little information the banks could provide” “Knowing what we know now, we should have banged the table more forcefully” he now says. Well Mr. Gensler, as oil trading has become the litmus test of all commodity exchange based pricing, we are waiting to hear the loud bangs, especially when it comes to oil!

Read the full article →

Investors Wait More Fundamentals and Earnings from the World’s Largest Economy!

February 7, 2010

Investors Wait More Fundamentals and Earnings from the World’s Largest Economy!

Read the full article →

Fareed Mohamedi: The Resilience of Dubai and the Gulf

December 1, 2009

The collapse of Dubai World has called into question the failure of the Dubai economic model and even undermined confidence in the economic future of the Gulf. Much of these sentiments are misplaced as was the loss of confidence in the “Asian Model” in the late 1990s. In fact, both are quite similar since Dubai largely copied Singapore and the other Southeast Asian tigers. Structurally, both had three essential features: An efficient and effective state planned and built world class infrastructure to attract private businesses. Of course, the seedy side of this was the use of virtually indentured labor from South Asia (in the case of Southeast Asia it was the Philippines and Indonesia). Business investment was encouraged and actually established directly by the state to provide services to a globalized market place (i.e. tourism, business services, media, telecom, cargo handling and even additions to the global production chain) Regional gaps and shortages created by restrictions and blockages in trade and finance in specific countries (for Dubai these target markets were Iran, Saudi Arabia, India, Pakistan and the FSU) were filled and alleviated. Two additional features facilitated and ensured the development of the economic space: A heavy reliance on debt financing, which in the specific case of Dubai also exploited the innovations of Islamic finance seen in the last decade The creation of commercially run government companies that had the implicit guarantee of the sovereign. In Dubai’s case there was an additional implicit guarantee from Abu Dhabi. These mobilized capital and created core sectors which then led to the in-gathering of other private sector businesses Both the Asia Model and its Gulf clone had a big weakness – over reliance on debt. This was partly a function of the government guarantees and in this case, Abu Dhabi’s back stop role. The success of Dubai in promoting itself also played a major role in the financial overstretch as local, regional and international lenders indulged the Emirate. Given the enormous amounts of excess liquidity in the Gulf and worldwide, prior to the financial crisis, it was almost inevitable that Dubai borrowed excessively, just as the Southeast Asian had in the run up to the crash in 1997-1998. Despite this proclivity towards over borrowing, the fundamentals of the Dubai model are still sound. The infrastructure has been built and is still very useful. The underlying business logic of Dubai Inc – i.e. globalization of services and meeting regional finance and trade needs — is still very viable even if demand for these services is somewhat more muted due to the problems of the world economy, financial instability and reversals in globalization. Moreover, this will put more pressure on the Dubai Executive to tighten up on regulations and improve governance, including financial management, which should improve the ability of Dubai to weather future storms. Ironically, one of the consequences of the financial bust, a sharp reduction in asset prices, will enhance the Emirate’s competitiveness. What appears not to be sound is the political issue which underpins the Dubai model (see separate forthcoming MIS memo). To get back on track, ruling families of the UAE will have to appear united and work on putting Dubai back on a more sustainable footing. Once this is done, there are few reasons for Dubai not to grow at a steady sustainable rate over the long term. Another important factor that will help the long term growth of Dubai is that the rest of the Gulf’s economies are resilient and their growth models (adaptations of Dubai and the Asian Model) are sound. Saudi Arabia is embarking on a huge capital investment program financed not by debt but by government cash reserves and a determination to keep prices above the Kingdom’s threshold price of $55/b. Foreign and domestic private investment in petrochemicals and other downstream industries will also prolong the strong growth prospects in the Kingdom. Similarly, Abu Dhabi is trying to develop its economy again from its vast foreign exchange reserves. While Abu Dhabi’s development could be competition to Dubai, it most likely will complement its neighbor because many of the services it requires could be more economically purchased next door. The overall Gulf’s growth will certainly help Dubai – Iraq’s reconstruction is still on the horizon and could be another fillip to regional growth prospects. The ultimate threat to the wellbeing of the region in the medium term is a sustained fall in the price of oil. There the prospects overall look fairly favorable despite a few dark clouds on the horizon. Most excess capacity is in the hands of the Saudis who are loath to do anything to destabilize the price. Other potential competitors to the Saudis and overall OPEC – the BRINK countries – potential output surges are not expected for a few years and there is still a high degree of expectation that they will absorbed without being disruptive to prices. Overall, the fundamentals and the economic policies of the Gulf, including Dubai, are sound and we will likely see this episode fade into the past –just as the Asian crisis did after the late 1990s.

Read the full article →

Warren Buffet Tells Columbia Business Students: "The Financial Panic Is Over" (VIDEO)

November 13, 2009

Warren Buffett and Bill Gates spoke to a group of Columbia students on Thursday for a CNBC town hall and question-and-answer session. The business giants discussed topics ranging from capitalism and the state of the economy to Goldman Sachs, Apple, and Google, and they were decidedly positive in their outlooks. When asked whether at any point over the last year they’d doubted capitalism and the American “way of life,” both expressed confidence in the system. “This country works,” Buffett told the audience. “We have two hundred years of proof, and it’s going to continue to work.” Gates said the United States is still a great place for innovation and science, and he said that while he expected that “we’re going to tune our system of capitalism,” overall the structure of the American free market system is strong: “There are definitely some lessons, but the fundamentals of the system, a marketplace driven system where we invest in education, in a great infrastructure for the long term, that’s continued.” Buffett conceded that the “economy was sputtering, still is sputtering some,” but he indicated that there is great opportunity for growth within the country, and counseled investors to look inward before going overseas. He also addressed the challenge of regulatory reform: “Going forward, it’s a very tricky thing to figure out how to present excessive leverage, how to prevent off balance sheet arrangements from getting in trouble, or for just having people at the top of major institutions that run risks that they shouldn’t be running. We’re wrestling with that right now.” The students applauded and clapped in unanimity after each of Buffett’s punch lines- all variations on: “Right now, I would pay $100,000 for 10 percent of the future earnings of any of you. So, if anyone wants to see me after this is over …” WATCH: Get HuffPost Business On Facebook and Twitter !

Read the full article →

10.2% Unemployment and the Impact on Commercial Real Estate …

November 8, 2009

As I have always stated, our commercial real estate markets need employment more than anything else to enhance our fundamentals and turn our outlook around. As unemployment increases, our fundamentals degrade and as our fundamentals …

Read the full article →

Yvette Kantrow: Finance for dummies

August 10, 2009

I don’t know what the Federal Reserve is. I don’t know what they’re doing.” So admitted comedian-commentator Bill Maher on his HBO talk show a few weeks ago, expressing a sentiment that, judging by the applause, was shared by many members of his presumably well-educated, media-consuming, studio audience. One of Maher’s guests, humorist Joe Queenan, also fessed up to being pig ignorant of what the Fed is and does. And earlier that same week, Eliot Spitzer, the onetime sheriff of Wall Street, told MSNBC’s Dylan Ratigan that the Federal Reserve “is a Ponzi scheme, an inside job” that must be closely examined by Congress. Spitzer was referring specifically to the New York Fed, a distinction that quickly fell away as his ready-for-prime-time sound bite shot through a blogosphere intent on viewing anything to do with finance as part of a conspiracy theory. “That scared the hell out of me,” Maher told his guests. “Despite what he likes in his sex life, [Spitzer] knows a lot about this.” Maybe he does, maybe he doesn’t. But one thing Spitzer clearly knows is how to play to a crowd desperate to suss out villains in a financial crisis. And let’s face it, the Fed is as good a target as any. Shrouded in secrecy, the central bank, which may see its powers broadened in a regulatory overhaul, remains a mystery to many. This is true, despite the truckload of media coverage devoted to economics and finance these past few months, including a special PBS “NewsHour” “forum” in late July in which Fed chairman Ben Bernanke took the unprecedented step of answering questions from 40 people from Kansas City, Mo. The first query came from a social worker who asked Bernanke to explain what, exactly, is the Federal Reserve. “I don’t have a clue what they do,” she told the chairman. All of this eagerly professed ignorance got me thinking: What is it about anything that has to do with money, finance or economics that enables otherwise thinking people to plead total cluelessness? After all, most people work, earn money, use banks, save for retirement. The Supreme Court is no less secretive, mysterious, complicated or powerful than the Fed, but it’s pretty hard to imagine someone like Maher declaring that he has no idea what the court is or what it does. But people have no problem wearing their financial ignorance on their sleeves. They’re actually sort of proud of it. “I read as much of financial coverage as I can understand,” media critic Jack Shafer wrote back in late 2007. “I’m not embarrassed by my ignorance — why should I be? I can’t be much more clueless than the masters of the universe who have lost their companies billions.” Well, actually, you can, as Queenan proved that night on Maher. Indeed, another guest, historian Niall Ferguson, called out Queenan on his ignorance (earlier, Queenan proclaimed that Obama’s approval rating would be better if the Dow simply hit 10,000, healthcare, war and unemployment be damned) and proceeded to school him on the Fed and how it works. Queenan’s snide response (which he repeated several times): “I didn’t go to Harvard.” No, he didn’t, but he did once work at Forbes. OK, now we get it: Only smarty-pants, wonkish types get this stuff. The cool kids don’t know it, don’t understand it, certainly don’t want to study up on it, and, if like Ferguson, you do get it (and you actually teach at Harvard), you’re not just elitist, you’re suspect. Unaccessible. An apologist. Maybe you’re even in cahoots with all those guys on Wall Street with their bailout-fueled bonuses. The odd thing here is that many areas of finance are complex, even inaccessible, though the fundamentals, like the functions of the central bank, aren’t. And it’s arguably never been more important, particularly given the fact that every taxpayer owns chunks of some big banks, that ordinary Americans bone up on the subject. Instead, the attitude du jour seems to be to cheer on the notion that the Fed, which you may have the sketchiest understanding of, is a Ponzi scheme, or that Goldman, Sachs & Co. is a vampire squid that caused every bubble, or that Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. was brought down by eight evil men who treated the 24,992 salt-of-the-earth geniuses who worked for them like crap. It’s almost like folks secretly want to encourage the very thing they fear. The cartoon is so much more satisfying than the truth. Yvette Kantrow is executive editor of The Deal

Read the full article →

Yvette Kantrow: Finance for dummies

August 10, 2009

I don’t know what the Federal Reserve is. I don’t know what they’re doing.” So admitted comedian-commentator Bill Maher on his HBO talk show a few weeks ago, expressing a sentiment that, judging by the applause, was shared by many members of his presumably well-educated, media-consuming, studio audience. One of Maher’s guests, humorist Joe Queenan, also fessed up to being pig ignorant of what the Fed is and does. And earlier that same week, Eliot Spitzer, the onetime sheriff of Wall Street, told MSNBC’s Dylan Ratigan that the Federal Reserve “is a Ponzi scheme, an inside job” that must be closely examined by Congress. Spitzer was referring specifically to the New York Fed, a distinction that quickly fell away as his ready-for-prime-time sound bite shot through a blogosphere intent on viewing anything to do with finance as part of a conspiracy theory. “That scared the hell out of me,” Maher told his guests. “Despite what he likes in his sex life, [Spitzer] knows a lot about this.” Maybe he does, maybe he doesn’t. But one thing Spitzer clearly knows is how to play to a crowd desperate to suss out villains in a financial crisis. And let’s face it, the Fed is as good a target as any. Shrouded in secrecy, the central bank, which may see its powers broadened in a regulatory overhaul, remains a mystery to many. This is true, despite the truckload of media coverage devoted to economics and finance these past few months, including a special PBS “NewsHour” “forum” in late July in which Fed chairman Ben Bernanke took the unprecedented step of answering questions from 40 people from Kansas City, Mo. The first query came from a social worker who asked Bernanke to explain what, exactly, is the Federal Reserve. “I don’t have a clue what they do,” she told the chairman. All of this eagerly professed ignorance got me thinking: What is it about anything that has to do with money, finance or economics that enables otherwise thinking people to plead total cluelessness? After all, most people work, earn money, use banks, save for retirement. The Supreme Court is no less secretive, mysterious, complicated or powerful than the Fed, but it’s pretty hard to imagine someone like Maher declaring that he has no idea what the court is or what it does. But people have no problem wearing their financial ignorance on their sleeves. They’re actually sort of proud of it. “I read as much of financial coverage as I can understand,” media critic Jack Shafer wrote back in late 2007. “I’m not embarrassed by my ignorance — why should I be? I can’t be much more clueless than the masters of the universe who have lost their companies billions.” Well, actually, you can, as Queenan proved that night on Maher. Indeed, another guest, historian Niall Ferguson, called out Queenan on his ignorance (earlier, Queenan proclaimed that Obama’s approval rating would be better if the Dow simply hit 10,000, healthcare, war and unemployment be damned) and proceeded to school him on the Fed and how it works. Queenan’s snide response (which he repeated several times): “I didn’t go to Harvard.” No, he didn’t, but he did once work at Forbes. OK, now we get it: Only smarty-pants, wonkish types get this stuff. The cool kids don’t know it, don’t understand it, certainly don’t want to study up on it, and, if like Ferguson, you do get it (and you actually teach at Harvard), you’re not just elitist, you’re suspect. Unaccessible. An apologist. Maybe you’re even in cahoots with all those guys on Wall Street with their bailout-fueled bonuses. The odd thing here is that many areas of finance are complex, even inaccessible, though the fundamentals, like the functions of the central bank, aren’t. And it’s arguably never been more important, particularly given the fact that every taxpayer owns chunks of some big banks, that ordinary Americans bone up on the subject. Instead, the attitude du jour seems to be to cheer on the notion that the Fed, which you may have the sketchiest understanding of, is a Ponzi scheme, or that Goldman, Sachs & Co. is a vampire squid that caused every bubble, or that Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. was brought down by eight evil men who treated the 24,992 salt-of-the-earth geniuses who worked for them like crap. It’s almost like folks secretly want to encourage the very thing they fear. The cartoon is so much more satisfying than the truth. Yvette Kantrow is executive editor of The Deal

Read the full article →