guinea

menafn.com…

Asian Activities Report for May 24, 2011: Mincor Resources NL (ASX:MCR) Announce A$30 Million Gold And Copper Transaction In Papua New Guinea

Read the original here:
Asian Activities Report for May 24, 2011: Mincor Resources NL (ASX:MCR) Announce A$30 Million Gold And Copper Transaction In Papua New Guinea

Find our Weekly Commercial Real Estate, Private Equity and Fund Newsletters at www.WeeklyBrief.net

menafn.com…

Gold Anomaly Limited (ASX:GOA) Update On Crater Mountain Gold Project In Papua New Guinea

View original post here:
Gold Anomaly Limited (ASX:GOA) Update On Crater Mountain Gold Project In Papua New Guinea

Find our Weekly Commercial Real Estate, Private Equity and Fund Newsletters at www.WeeklyBrief.net

Indochine Mining Limited (ASX:IDC) Advances Option Over Mt Kare Gold Project In Papua New Guinea

February 17, 2011

Indochine Mining Limited (ASX:IDC) Advances Option Over Mt Kare Gold Project In Papua New Guinea

Read the full article →

MIL Resources (ASX:MGK) Signed Memorandum Of Understanding With SinoTech To Raise A$5 Million For Gold And Base Metals Projects In Papua New Guinea

October 15, 2010

MIL Resources (ASX:MGK) Signed Memorandum Of Understanding With SinoTech To Raise A$5 Million For Gold And Base Metals Projects In Papua New Guinea

Read the full article →

KBR awarded design build contract for Papua New Guinea apartment

October 14, 2010

KBR awarded design build contract for Papua New Guinea apartment

Read the full article →

Patricia Handschiegel: The New Power Girls: Meet The Power Girl Who Is Changing How Brands Market Online

October 5, 2010

Palo Alto, CA is quiet but busy on a late weekday afternoon as I join fellow Power Girl Julia Kung for a business lunch on the outdoor patio of one of the city’s cute restaurants. A half dozen or so dot the “downtown” area of the sleepy town, many of which appear to serve Italian food. As we take our seats and dig into a selection of fresh bread, we are like any other women in the city, having a late lunch. Julia’s in killer gray peep toe ankle boots and a chic, oversized top. I’m in gold Christian Louboutin heels. Our companies were doing business together at the time, but like most Power Girls, business is always peppered with friendships and camaraderie. Today’s new modern women entrepreneurs and executives aren’t just blazing it in business, they’re also cool, fun people you get along with. When it comes to marketing, Julia is the best in the business. A hybrid mix of old and new school practice, with a tech-savvy that’ll blow your social media expert out of the water, Julia’s work is garnering major attention in the business. Her work with Moxsie.com has captured major fashion industry cred like WWD and California Apparel News. In the past year, she’s been invited to speak at prestigious conferences like Internet Retailer. Most marketers today operate under false assumptions, aren’t savvy about page views and analytics, rely on tired, elaborate “call to action” campaigns because they believe that every consumer wants (or has time) to “engage,” etc. When marketing strategy came up among a group of female founders this past week, I couldn’t help but to email Julia to tap her insight. Here’s what she shared: You’re one of the best cross-platform, cross-media marketers I know, particularly on the web. What’s the secret? There is no secret at all. Since Moxsie is a small company and our target demographic is very wired and engaged on many platforms, it’s a no-brainer. Also, the twin limitations of bandwidth and budget mean that we can’t rely solely on traditional marketing and advertising, so we have to get creative and experiment. We’re always willing to be the guinea pig with new technology. I’m impressed by big brands that are able to get corporate buy-in for new media since it’s got to be harder for them to take those risks. Finally, I’d like to emphasize that it all depends on the product. Our site might have all the bells and whistles, and we might promote and cross promote on a billion platforms, but it won’t matter if the independent fashion we sell isn’t appealing. Luckily, we carry the best stuff! Moxsie’s generated tons of traffic and sales through your marketing efforts, what do you feel has been the key/critical piece to your strategy? This’ll be a surprising answer from someone who sells independent fashion, but I think our location has been very key. New York and LA are generally considered the US fashion centers, but Moxsie’s location in the Bay Area means that we have easy access to a lot of great partners. Polyvore, Kaboodle, Twitter, and TheFind are examples of companies that we’ve established great working relationships with. They like it when we test new products for them, and we like that these products help us drive sales. Also, I’ve been very lucky to hire extraordinary people for the marketing team: (Nathan Zaru and Mayka Mei- check out Mayka’s blog at themaykazine.com). They’re young, eager to learn, and great at multi tasking. Most importantly, they are well versed in new media and have specialized skill sets that encompass the whole range of marketing needs. We’re a very small team, but we’re able to accomplish so much because of this. Companies may feel overwhelmed by all the noise, wide marketplace and reach they can have. How can they remain focused? The marketing mantra is “what’s the goal?” As long as you only use tools and media to accomplish the goals you set out initially, you won’t be distracted. Moxsie created what’s essentially a new niche (indie fashion) — how important is it today for companies to differentiate, especially since there is so much of the same things online? Why would customers come to your site if you’re exactly the same as something that already exists? Moxsie carries accessibly priced independent fashion for men and women, which is already unique. We’ve also made the purchasing experience unique too! For example, you can see a live twitter feed of Moxsie mentions through the twitter-sphere when you’re browsing so you know what sorts of things other people are interested in, during check-out we allow you to choose a charity that we donate a portion of our proceeds to, every purchase from our warehouse is gift-wrapped, and people that purchase from us get special deals that aren’t available to everyone else. These are just some of the ways we make sure that the Moxsie experience is an indelible memory. What do you feel are the online marketing must-haves for companies today? Investment in social media is crucial for B2C companies, and usually very useful for B2B. The basics of marketing and also SEM + SEO are obvious necessities. Probably the most important must-have isn’t any sort of tool, but the right mindset. Marketing should be an adventure! What are some of the mistakes a lot of companies make in marketing online? Never waste an opportunity. This is when I offer anyone who’s read this far into the article a 15% off coupon code on www.moxsie.com- Just use “NEWPOWERGIRLS” in your shopping cart for 15% off. It’ll be live till the end of 2010. Thanks for reading this far people, and may I recommend our women’s shoe and boot selection ? They are to die for. I love that. How important are blogs and media today to online strategy? Are these things still relevant when companies can now reach audiences themselves more than ever? Blogs and media are extraordinarily important! Moxsie stays in touch with a large number of bloggers. We love the blogging community because it’s fun, unfettered, and allows information to be communicated so creatively. Additionally, many of these blogs are influencers not only of consumers but of other media. It all feeds off of each other. Moxsie’s also really great about advertising online — what’s behind your success in it? There is definitely no magic formula here. We’ve done plenty of testing to determine which formats and audiences work best. Since we have a limited budget, we keep our focus narrow and campaigns are always ROI driven. Is there anything companies absolutely should NOT do online? You have to try everything once, right? Can’t be scared of making mistakes. If there’s one don’t, I’d choose Google’s corporate motto of “Don’t be evil.”

Read the full article →

SARI anuncia el nombramiento del Sr. Daouda Camara para la junta directiva

September 5, 2010

HONG KONG–(Marketwire – September 5, 2010) – SARI se complace en anunciar el nombramiento de Daouda Camara como director general de Sky Alliance Resources Guinée S.A y presidente de la junta directiva de Sky Alliance Resources Inc. El Sr. Daouda Camara ha tenido una notable carrera con gran éxito en los sectores público y privado en el transcurso de los últimos 30 años. Durante el período de 2004 a 2008, ejerció como director de gabinete de seis primeros ministros. El Sr. Camara también fue secretario general de la junta directiva y antiguo administrador y director legal de la Empresa Minera de Mineral de Hierro de Guinea, Mifergui-Nimba (1978-1984), director general de la Junta Nacional de Electricidad de Guinea, (ENELGUI) 1997-2002, presidente de la junta directiva de Société des Bauxites de Kindia, 1994-1997, y abogado y asesor fiscal del Ministerio de Recursos Naturales, Energía y Medio Ambiente, 1986-1997. Durante est

Read the full article →

SARI anuncia nomeação do Sr. Daouda Camara para a Diretoria

September 5, 2010

HONG KONG–(Marketwire – September 5, 2010) – A SARI tem o prazer de anunciar a nomeação de Daouda Camara como Diretor Geral da Sky Alliance Resources Guinée S.A e como Chairman da Sky Alliance Resources Inc. Daouda Camara tem tido uma carreira destacada com sucesso nos setores público e privado há mais de 30 anos. De 2004-2008, ele foi o Diretor de do Gabinete de seis Primeiros-Ministros. O Sr. Camara também é ex-Secretário Geral da Diretoria e ex-Diretor Administrativo de Jurídico da Iron Ore Mining Company of Guinea Mifergui-Nimba (1978-1984), ex-Diretor Geral da National Electricity Board (ENELGUI) 1997-2002 de Guiné, ex-Chairman da Société des Bauxites de Kindia, 1994-1997, e ex-advogado e consultor fiscal do Ministério de Recursos Naturais, Energia e Meio Ambiente, 1986-1997. Durante este período o Sr. Camara foi instrumental na criação, estruturação e elaboração do atual C&

Read the full article →

SARI Announces the Appointment of Mr. Daouda Camara to the Board of Directors

September 4, 2010

HONG KONG–(Marketwire – September 5, 2010) –  SARI is pleased to announce the appointment of Daouda Camara as Director General of Sky Alliance Resources Guinée S.A and Chairman of Sky Alliance Resources Inc. Daouda Camara has had a distinguished career with successes in both the public and private sectors over the last 30 years. From 2004-2008, he served as the Director of the cabinet to six Prime Ministers. Mr. Camara also served as former Secretary General of the Board of Directors and former Administrative and Legal Director of the Iron Ore Mining Company of Guinea Mifergui-Nimba (1978-1984), Director General for Guinea’s National Electricity Board (ENELGUI) 1997-2002, Board Chairman of Société des Bauxites de Kindia, 1994-1997, and as lawyer and fiscal advisor to the Ministry of Natural Resources, Energy and Environment, 1986-1997. During this period, Mr. Camara was instrumental in writing, structuring and drafting the current Mining Code for the Republic of

Read the full article →

Vale acquires $2.5b deposits in Guinea

May 2, 2010

Vale acquires $2.5b deposits in Guinea

Read the full article →

Brazil’s Vale Pays $2.5 Billion for Seized Rio Tinto Ore Assets in Guinea

April 30, 2010

By Jessica Brice April 30 (Bloomberg) — Vale SA , the world’s largest iron- ore producer, agreed to pay $2.5 billion for deposits in Guinea confiscated from Rio Tinto Group over a development dispute. Vale will pay $500 million up front for 51 percent of BSG Resources (Guinea) Ltd. and the remainder as the projects meet targets, the company said today in a statement. The deal includes the Simandou North Blocks 1 and 2, previously owned by Rio Tinto, and the Zogota project in Simandou South. Rio de Janeiro-based Vale is expanding output as steel production in China surges, helping drive global iron-ore demand to 1 billion tons this year, according to Barclays Capital. The company boosted prices about 90 percent this year and departed from a 40-year-old system of setting annual contracts as it seeks greater flexibility to increase prices when demand gains. The acquisition “would be neutral for the stock, given our concern that there is too much iron ore coming to the market in the coming years,” BTG Pactual analyst Edmo Chagas said in a note to clients. “It’s a defensive move on the part of Vale.” Rio controlled the entire Simandou deposit, including blocks 1 and 2, until it was ordered by the government in December 2008 to hand over the northern half to BSG Resources Ltd., the closely held company that sold the stake to Vale and is controlled by Israeli diamond investor Beny Steinmetz. ‘Best Undeveloped Deposits’ “Simandou Blocks 1 and 2 and Zogota are among the best undeveloped iron-ore deposits in the world,” Vale said in the statement. The deposits have “high quality and the development potential for a large-scale and long-term project with low operating and investment costs.” Vale fell 82 centavos, or 1.7 percent, to 47.03 reais at 1:42 p.m. in Sao Paulo trading. BSG plans to start producing from blocks 1 and 2 in 2013, with output ramping up to 100 million metric tons a year, according to the company’s website. Zogota, set to start in 2012, will have the capacity to produce 25 million tons a year. Brazil and Australia are the only regions that still have developed projects with quality iron ore, Leonardo Alves, an analyst at Link Corretora, said in a telephone interview from Sao Paulo. “It’s only natural that Vale and other miners would look for opportunities in Africa.” Guinean Mines Minister Mahmoud Thiam said in July that Rio didn’t need all of Simandou and that the decision to split the deposit was irreversible. BSG Chief Executive Officer Marc Struik said in December 2008 that Rio lost the concession because it had put the project “on the backburner.” ‘Security of Tenure’ “A number of issues related to security of tenure remain to be resolved with the new government of Guinea,” Rio said in its March 14 annual report. Faeth Birch, a spokeswoman for Rio, declined to comment today. Aluminum Corp. of China last month agreed to pay $1.35 billion for a stake in Rio ’s neighboring Simandou project. Chinalco, as the state-owned company is known, will acquire 45 percent of the project by funding development over the next two to three years. Simandou was described by Rio Chief Executive Officer Tom Albanese in May 2008 as the world’s “top” undeveloped iron-ore deposit. Rio dropped 156 pence, or 4.4 percent, to 3,377 pence as of 4:14 p.m. in London trading. To contact the reporter responsible for this story: Jessica Brice in Sao Paulo at jbrice1@bloomberg.net

Read the full article →

Lihir Gold Rejects $8.4 Billion Takeover Offer From Newcrest as Too Low

March 31, 2010

By Rebecca Keenan and Shani Raja April 1 (Bloomberg) — Lihir Gold Ltd. rejected a A$9.2 billion ($8.4 billion) cash and stock takeover from Newcrest Mining Ltd. , a deal that would create the world’s fifth-biggest producer of the metal with 10 mines in five nations. The bid values Lihir shares at A$3.87 each, 28 percent more than yesterday’s close. The offer from Newcrest, Australia’s largest gold mining company, is inadequate, the Port Morseby, Papua New Guinea-based company said today in a statement. Buying Lihir would give Newcrest Chief Executive Officer Ian Smith mines in Papua New Guinea, Australia and Africa, amid gold’s longest rally since 1979. Shares in Lihir, which gave Newcrest access to some of its finances, rose as much as 32 percent, sparking a rise in gold mining stocks. “They could agree a higher price with the Lihir board,” said Prasad Patkar , who helps manage about $1.6 billion at Platypus Asset Management in Sydney, including Lihir shares. A bid of about A$4.50 may be acceptable, he said. “They seem to be saying, ‘we’ll sell but for a better price,’ and they don’t want to be bound by conditions that could prevent a competing bid.” Lihir, the second-largest gold mining company on the Australian stock exchange, rose 90 cents to A$3.93 at 1:45 p.m. Sydney time. Melbourne-based Newcrest, which confirmed the offer, fell 1.6 percent to A$32.30. Surplus Cash Newmont Mining Corp., the largest U.S. gold producer, and BHP Billiton Ltd. are among mining companies that may make acquisitions this year as revived metal prices buoy finances, Citigroup Inc. said last week. Mining companies may have $91.3 billion of surplus cash, after paying dividends and capital expenditure, by 2012, according to the broker. Newcrest offered one of its shares for every nine of Lihir’s plus 22.5 cents cash on March 29. It had made an initial proposal of one of its shares for every 9.5 Lihir shares on Feb. 15, Newcrest said today in a statement. “While the board recognized the strategic merits of the combination of the two companies, following careful review and analysis, directors unanimously determined that the offer did not represent good value,” Lihir said in the statement. It received the offer on March 29, it said. Gold jumped to a record $1,226.56 an ounce in December, rallying for a ninth year, as governments cut interest rates and committed trillions of dollars to prop up economies, while central banks in India and China bought bullion. ‘No Fire-sale’ Newcrest is offering to pay 18 times earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization, or EDITDA, compared with the median multiple of 24 times for 10 gold mining industry deals complied by Bloomberg data. Lihir is trading at 26 times future earnings, compared with 24 times for Newcrest. “Lihir are not going to give it away, it’s not a fire-sale, they don’t need Newcrest,” Lucinda Chan , division director and head of Asian business at Macquarie Private Wealth in Sydney, said by phone. Should Newcrest “want to see full value in their production growth, they may have to pay up to get it. If they want it bad enough, they’ll be back for it,” she said. Lihir is “worth a lot more than was reflected in the offer,” Chairman Ross Garnaut said today on Bloomberg TV. The takeover would deliver pretax cost savings of A$85 million a year, Newcrest said. The combined group would have a market value of A$24.5 billion, sales of A$3.9 billion and production of 2.8 million ounces a year, it said, based on 2009 figures. It also would have the world’s fourth-biggest gold equivalent reserves. Combination Logic “While we believe the logic of the combination to be compelling, this is not a ‘must do’ transaction for Newcrest,” Newcrest chairman Don Mercer said in the statement. Lihir is targeting a 40 percent gain in average output to 1.45 million ounces from 2012 to 2016. Last year it produced 1.124 million ounces from its mines in Australia, Papua New Guinea and the Ivory Coast in West Africa. Its biggest asset is the Lihir mine in Papua New Guinea, the world’s fourth-biggest by reserves, according to Southern Cross Equities Ltd. The offer is about 1.5 times Lihir’s net present value which is “in line with where the stock has traded historically, so arguably it doesn’t incorporate a significant premium,” RBS Equities Australia Ltd. analyst Lyndon Fagan said today. “You can’t rule out another offer.” Output Boost Newcrest’s Smith last year outlined a five-year plan to boost output 40 percent from its mines in Indonesia and Australia and is studying a A$2 billion expansion at its Cadia Valley operation. It said in January that it’s targeting full- year production of between 1.81 million and 1.91 million ounces. “There’s no obvious synergies because geographically there’s no overlap,” RBS’ Fagan said. Still, “Newcrest management could add a lot of value to Lihir’s operations.” Lihir today named Graeme Hunt , a former senior executive at BHP as chief executive officer, replacing Arthur Hood who resigned in January after his contract was not renewed. Hood led the acquisition of Ballarat Goldfields NL in 2006, which resulted in the company booking $413 million of one-time charges. The Ballarat mine was sold last month for A$4.5 million. Gold for immediate delivery advanced 0.1 percent to $1,113.60 an ounce at 1:16 p.m. Sydney time. Newcrest is advised by Lazard Ltd. and Merrill Lynch, a Bank of America Corp. unit. To contact the reporters on this story: Rebecca Keenan in Melbourne at rkeenan5@bloomberg.net Shani Raja in Sydney at sraja4@bloomberg.net

Read the full article →

Fortescue Returns Crushing Rio Tinto in Outback Where China Finds Its Ore

March 26, 2010

By William Mellor March 26 (Bloomberg) — Zeljko Zaic, a leathery-skinned surveyor at a Chinese-backed mining company, stands atop a sun- scorched ridge in the Australian Outback and kicks a lump of red iron ore lying on the trail. “One day soon this will be part of someone’s house in China,” he says. In only five months, this 1,900-square-kilometer (734- square-mile) stretch of semidesert and salt lakes in the midwestern region of Western Australia has been transformed from a desolate habitat for kangaroos and bush flies into a base for the next wave of the nation’s mining boom, Bloomberg Markets reports in its May issue. Below the 80-meter-high (260-foot- high) ridge, Australia’s Gindalbie Metals Ltd. has joined with China’s Anshan Iron & Steel Group to build a A$1.8 billion ($1.65 billion) iron ore mine. The project includes a nine-story processing plant, a township of air-conditioned homes and a pub, restaurant and cricket pitch for 1,500 workers. Fueled by China’s appetite for minerals, about 50 publicly traded mining companies , many with market caps of less than A$2 billion, are spreading out mostly in Western Australia, a region four times the size of Texas with a population of just 2.2 million. Chinese investors, mainly state-owned steelmakers, have funded at least 20 of these outfits as part of Beijing’s move to reduce its dependence on Melbourne-based BHP Billiton Ltd. , the world’s biggest miner, and Rio Tinto Group , the No. 2 iron ore exporter. 15-Fold Jump The shares of eight Chinese-backed iron ore companies skyrocketed as much as 15-fold from 2005 to 2010, turning a handful of entrepreneurs into actual or aspiring billionaires. “It’s been life changing for some of these people,” says Tim Schroeders , who helps manage $1 billion, including mining shares, at Pengana Capital Ltd. in Melbourne. “It would have been a pipe dream 10 years ago to think you could compete with the world’s biggest mining companies.” The global financial crisis put a momentary damper on the five-year Australian mining frenzy. Three months after the spot price of iron ore plunged by more than 60 percent to $59 a ton in March 2009, relations between Australia and China also took a nose dive. In June, London-based Rio Tinto rejected an investment from Aluminum Corp. of China , known as Chinalco. Soon after, Chinese authorities arrested and indicted four Rio Tinto executives on charges of stealing commercial secrets and bribery. At the time, Australian politicians in Canberra decried the arrests as an act of retaliation and Rio Tinto said the allegations were without foundation. Guilty Pleas During a three-day trial which finished on Wednesday, all four employees, including Australian citizen Stern Hu , admitted to accepting bribes, according to lawyers present. Hu denied stealing commercial secrets, Australia’s The Age newspaper reported, as did two other defendants, according to their lawyers. The court, which barred foreign media from covering the proceedings, will deliver its verdict on Monday, Rio Tinto said in a statement. As China’s economy speeds up again, spurring record iron ore imports, political tensions are fading. The government of Prime Minister Kevin Rudd , a Chinese speaker and former diplomat in Beijing, said in March that the arrests were separate from Australia’s productive relationship with China. Rio Tinto, which sells 70 percent of its iron ore to China, is also trying to rebuild its relationship with Beijing. Three days before the trial of its employees began, the company announced it plans to take Chinalco as a partner to develop an iron ore mine in the African state of Guinea. Rio Tinto’s Chief Executive Officer Tom Albanese spoke at a conference in Beijing on Monday, saying he hoped Chinalco’s agreement to invest $1.35 billion in the Guinea joint venture would be a model for other Chinese partnerships. ‘Ride of Our Lives’ Thanks to its A$22 billion in iron ore exports to China, Australia was one of the few major economies to escape a recession during the credit crackup. “China is giving us the ride of our lives,” says Colin Barnett , premier of Western Australia. “There are risks and uncertainties, but it’s a ride we have got to take.” The Foreign Investment Review Board has approved the vast majority of the Chinese deals for small Australian mining outfits. The government is more likely to challenge Chinese attempts to buy more than 15 percent of major resource companies and 50 percent of new outfits, says Patrick Colmer, a member of the review board. Andrew Forrest “The Chinese government asks its companies to acquire strategic natural resources,” says Deng Qilin , general manager of Wuhan Iron & Steel Group Corp., which invested in two small Australian mining companies in 2008. “We are not saying we must take a controlling stake. We like any form of investment so long as we get the resources.” Last year, state-owned Hunan Valin Iron & Steel Group paid A$1.3 billion for a 17.3 percent stake in Fortescue Metals Group Ltd. The company was founded in 2003 by Andrew “Twiggy” Forrest , 48, who grew up on an Outback cattle ranch as the great-grandnephew of a 19th-century Western Australian explorer and state premier. Perth-based Fortescue, which makes almost all of its revenue from exports to China, earned A$508 million in the year ended in June 2009. Forrest’s worth grew to at least A$4.7 billion as his company’s shares soared 1,200 percent in the five years from March 2005, giving it a market cap of A$14.8 billion. Shares of Fortescue have increased almost 10 times faster than Rio Tinto’s and eight times more than BHP’s in that five- year span. BHP shares have also pleased investors, hitting a record high close of 2,248.5 pence in London on March 25. Rio Tinto’s London-listed shares hit 3,882 pence, the highest since Sept. 2, 2008. Leucadia National Western investors have made many millions on the Chinese- backed companies. In 2006, New York-based Leucadia National Corp. paid $452 million for a stake of about 10 percent in Fortescue and the rights to 4 percent of revenues from two mines until 2019. Although this year Leucadia reduced its stake to 8 percent to take some profit, the value of its investment more than doubled to A$1.19 billion as of March 25. Paul Kopejtka has both battled and collaborated with Chinese investors. A coal miner’s son from Western Australia, Kopejtka, 42, earned a chemical engineering degree from Perth’s Curtin University before founding Murchison Metals Ltd. in 2004 and selling shares a year later. In 2009, Sinosteel Corp. , China’s biggest iron ore trader, outflanked Murchison in its bid to buy Midwest Corp. Sinosteel paid A$1.4 billion in a hostile takeover of Midwest. Sinosteel has also taken a 5.5 percent stake in Murchison and will use rails and a port that the Australian company is building to ship iron ore to China. China’s Top Supplier “It’s like a big chessboard, and everyone is jockeying for position,” says Kopejtka, who aspires to become a billionaire. Shares of Perth-based Murchison have soared 12-fold to A$2.65 since March 2005, making Kopejtka worth A$60 million. Australia is China’s top supplier of iron ore, providing it with 43 percent of its imports, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. BHP and Rio Tinto control more than 80 percent of the Australia-China iron ore trade. In 2007, BHP launched a takeover bid for Rio Tinto and abandoned the deal a year later as commodity prices began their plunge. Beijing officials denounced the planned takeover in state-controlled media as an attempt to create a price-fixing monopoly — an accusation that China has repeated several times. Iron ore spot prices more than doubled to $147.50 a metric ton on March 25 from a year earlier, according to the Steel Index. BHP and Rio Tinto, which have publicly denied they are trying to inflate prices, declined to comment for this article. Concentrate Power Beijing intensified its own dealmaking for Australian companies in 2008 when state-controlled Chinalco and Alcoa Inc. agreed to pay $14.5 billion for a 9 percent stake in Rio Tinto. The company accepted and then last June said no to an additional $19.5 billion investment from Chinalco following protests from shareholders and politicians. The politicians claimed that Chinalco wouldn’t be an asset to the mining industry because it would act in the interests of Beijing’s communist rulers. Instead, Rio returned to its former suitor, BHP, to form an iron ore joint venture. By combining mines, rails, ports and workforces in Western Australia’s Pilbara region, the two companies say they will save $10 billion. Executives Arrested The agreement will concentrate power in the iron ore market and result in higher prices for customers, according to Brussels-based steel industry group Eurofer. The European Union announced in January that it’s investigating whether the deal curbs competition. BHP and Rio Tinto have said their iron ore will continue to be marketed separately. In July, four weeks after the deal was announced, Stern Hu, head of Rio Tinto’s iron ore operations in China, and three other Rio Tinto employees were arrested in Shanghai. While China’s Foreign Minister Yang Jiechi said in July that the arrests weren’t related to Rio Tinto’s rejection of the Chinalco investment, some Australians aren’t so sure. “I don’t think it’s coincidental,” says Geoffrey Garrett , professor of political science at the University of Sydney. As the Rio Tinto executives await sentencing after pleading guilty to bribery in the People’s Court, Chinese-backed companies in Western Australia are ramping up operations. In Fortescue’s 2009 annual report to shareholders, Forrest, the founder, wrote that his company was battling against BHP and Rio Tinto on their home mining turf of the Pilbara, a northern region possessing the nation’s richest iron ore deposits. Shattered Duopoly “Your company has shattered the iron ore duopoly which existed in the Pilbara for many decades and firmly established itself as a vital alternative supplier of iron ore,” wrote Forrest. Forrest told Bloomberg Television on March 19 that he was studying plans to raise as much as $8.9 billion to help lift annual production to an eventual 260 million tons from the present 40 million. Four days later, Forrest told a conference in Perth that Fortescue was prepared to sell stakes of more than 50 percent in some of its lower grade iron ore projects in Western Australia to overseas steel mills. These projects include a joint venture with Baosteel Group Corp. , China’s second-largest steelmaker, that the company said is about to begin. While Fortescue posted sales of A$1.83 billion in the year ended in June 2009 — its first full year of mining — smaller companies face huge hurdles in competing against the mining giants. BHP and Rio Tinto, who trace their history back more than 100 years, occupy the best mining leases in the Pilbara. Port and Rail The hematite ore they mine needs only to be crushed before being loaded onto trains and ships. When the ore gets to China, it can often be fed directly into steelmaking furnaces without processing. Smaller companies are at a disadvantage because many of the remaining mining leases are for lower-grade ore, including magnetite. It contains less iron than hematite and needs more costly processing. Citic Pacific Ltd. , the Hong Kong unit of China’s biggest state-owned investment company, paid $200 million to Australian entrepreneur Clive Palmer for the rights to mine 1 billion metric tons of magnetite. Citic is now spending a total of $4 billion on several projects, including a 450-megawatt power station to process 28 million tons of the iron ore annually. The company also has to construct a 51-gigaliter (13.5 billion- gallon) desalination plant and a 25-kilometer (15.5-mile) slurry pipeline to transport the processed ore from the mills to a custom-built port. Mining Frontier BHP and Rio Tinto have another advantage: In the Outback, where there are few roads and train tracks, the mining giants built their own railway and port for their exclusive use. Their iron ore is loaded onto separate 2.5-kilometer-long trains and freighted 300 kilometers to the coast. In 2008, Fortescue became the first of the smaller iron ore mining companies to construct its own rails and port after spending five years and part of A$2.8 billion on the project. “It may have been one of the most challenging projects in mining,” says Philip Falcone , founder of New York hedge fund firm Harbinger Capital Partners, which has a 5.9 percent stake in Fortescue and owns 18 percent of Murchison, according to Bloomberg data. “There were very few that were capable of executing it like Andrew Forrest.” Japan’s Mitsubishi Six Chinese companies and their Australian partners are also setting up operations in the midwestern region, a new, mostly magnetite-mining frontier in Western Australia 1,000 kilometers south of the Pilbara. In the midwest, Karara Mining Ltd., the joint venture between Perth-based Gindalbie Metals and Anshan Iron & Steel, aims to start mining hematite and magnetite beginning next year. Unskilled workers can earn with overtime as much as A$140,000 a year. Foremen can make A$200,000. “Thank God for China,” says Dionne Drew, 43, a Karara safety officer. “Where would we be without them?” Mining outfits in the midwest won’t export large quantities of iron ore until the completion of the Oakajee Port and Rail project in 2013. The Western Australian government in 2008 awarded a A$4 billion contract to a joint venture between Murchison Metals and Japan’s Mitsubishi Corp. to build a deep- water port and 560-kilometer railway line. Murchison says the midwest may eventually produce as much as 100 million metric tons of iron ore a year — about one-third of the Pilbara’s output today. Riding the Dragon “There’s a lot of talking and development, but apart from Fortescue, very few of them are shipping yet,” says Richard Elman , founder of Noble Group Ltd. , a Hong Kong-based commodities supplier and owner of mines in Australia. “The infrastructure is very expensive and takes a long time to build.” Dennison Hambling , chief investment officer of Melbourne- based First Samuel Ltd., is splitting his bets between the big and small companies. He says First Samuel holds shares in Rio Tinto because, along with BHP, it will be dominating iron ore exports to China for years to come. The firm is also investing in the rise of Perth-based Ferraus Ltd. , an iron ore company backed by two Chinese state-owned companies that operates in the Pilbara. “China is positioning itself to play a major role in the next generation of iron ore miners,” says Hambling, who helps manage $300 million. “In 5 or 10 years, I don’t think Rio Tinto or BHP will be in as commanding a position as they are in now. There will be a fourth and fifth force in mining.” Investors will soon have another chance to cash in. Clive Palmer, 56, a law school dropout, became a billionaire investing in real estate and mining. This year, he plans to sell shares in his Brisbane, Queensland-based Resourcehouse Ltd., a company with iron ore and coal reserves. Palmer hopes to raise $3 billion — highlighting how the rewards of doing business with China have so far exceeded the risks entailed in riding the dragon. To contact the reporter on this story: William Mellor in Sydney at wmellor@bloomberg.net ;

Read the full article →

Exxon Lands U.S. Export Bank Funding After Footing Bill for Staff Travel

March 25, 2010

By Mark Drajem March 25 (Bloomberg) — Exxon Mobil Corp. and its partners in a $15 billion Papua New Guinea gas project last year paid the travel expenses for employees of the U.S. Export-Import Bank as it considered whether to help fund the venture. The four workers ran up $97,367 in bills traveling to London, Tokyo and the South Pacific, according to data compiled by the bank. They flew business class, viewed the project’s route by chartered aircraft and were entertained by costumed villagers. Eleven months later, the bank approved $3 billion in financing for the liquefied natural gas facility, the biggest transaction in the agency’s 75 years. Exxon Mobil, the biggest U.S. oil producer, isn’t alone in picking up the travel tab for the Washington-based bank. In the past two years, the bank accepted $366,865 for employee trips, according to information provided under a Freedom of Information Act request. Workers visited projects sponsored by companies including Newmont Mining Corp., ConocoPhillips , Saudi Aramco and Barrick Gold Corp. Such travel should be banned because the money may influence the bank’s decisions on billions of dollars in financing, said Craig Holman , a legislative representative at Public Citizen , an advocacy group based in Washington. “This is probably standard operating procedure, but it’s clearly an ethics violation,” Holman, whose organization monitors spending by lawmakers and government officials, said in an interview. “It’s clearly a conflict of interest.” ‘Standard Industry Practice’ The U.S. Export-Import Bank, which provides financing to expand U.S. trade, has let employees take company-paid research trips since at least 1993, following “standard industry practice” for lenders, Phil Cogan , a vice president of the bank, said in an interview. Corporate-funded trips are permitted only for examining overseas projects such as power plants, not for U.S. exporters such as aircraft maker Boeing Co. , he said. All trips are reviewed by an agency ethics officer and must follow federal travel restrictions, Cogan said. Payments go to the bank, not the employees, and if companies such as Exxon didn’t pay, taxpayers would have to, he said. The bank’s policy isn’t shared by government agencies such as the Food and Drug Administration and the Federal Aviation Administration, which prohibit staff travel paid by companies with business pending before them. The Consumer Product Safety Commission barred such travels after criticism in 2007 that its chairmen’s trips to conferences were paid for by makers of toys and appliances it regulates. The Export-Import Bank provides government-backed loans or guarantees to banks offering credit to exporters. As private credit dried up in the recession, the bank’s support to U.S. companies grew 50 percent, to $21 billion, in the 12 months ended Sept. 30 from the previous fiscal year. Tropical Forests The Papua New Guinea project will supply fuel to China, Japan and Taiwan, according to Exxon. The venture calls for a 430-mile (692-kilometer) pipeline that would cut through tropical forests and run undersea, and a liquefaction plant near the capital of Port Moresby. “Without the funding from Ex-Im and others, this project would not have gone forward,” Steve Kane, senior finance manager for the project, told an Export-Import Bank conference on March 11. Exxon owns 33.2 percent of the venture. Oil Search Ltd. of Port Moresby has 29 percent, Santos Ltd . of Adelaide, Australia, 13.5 percent, and Tokyo-based Nippon Oil Corp. 4.7 percent. Also among those with stakes in the project are an agency of the Papua New Guinea government and local landowners. The development will triple Papua New Guinea’s exports and double its gross domestic product, Oil Search, that country’s biggest oil producer, says on its Web site . The nation of 6.2 million, whose people speak more than 800 languages, has an $8.2 billion economy, according to the World Bank. Six-Day Trip An account of a six-day trip to Australia and Papua New Guinea in January 2009 by Export-Import Bank workers, with photos they took of the costumed dancers, was posted on the bank’s Web site. Margaret Ross , a spokeswoman for Irving, Texas-based Exxon, referred questions to Miles J. Shaw, a spokesman for the venture. Shaw, who is based in Port Moresby, said in an e-mail that Exxon and partners hosted the Export-Import Bank employees, and said it’s “normal practice.” Most U.S. government agencies follow guidelines , set by the General Services Administration, that prohibit corporate- sponsored travel if the circumstances “would cause a reasonable person with knowledge of all the facts relevant to a particular case to question the integrity of agency programs or operations.” Consumer Panel The Export-Import Bank “essentially mimics” the GSA guidelines, Cogan said. The bank’s regulations say corporate- funded travel is allowed when the bank’s interest in having employees attend such meetings “outweighs concern” about the appearance of conflicts of interest. The Consumer Product Safety Commission was criticized by lawmakers such as Representative Ed Markey , a Massachusetts Democrat, in 2007 because chairmen during the Bush administration went to 30 conferences paid by industries regulated by the agency. CPSC employees can no longer accept industry-funded trips, spokesman Scott Wolfson said in an e- mail. The Overseas Private Investment Corporation , a government entity that funds overseas projects as does the Export-Import Bank, charges companies a processing fee for applications and uses some of that money to pay for staff travel, spokesman Tim Harwood said. Saudi Aramco Saudi Aramco and Houston-based ConocoPhillips paid more than $30,000 to fly bank staff members to London and Seoul to investigate whether the U.S. lender would finance expansion of the Saudi Arabian Yanbu refinery, the bank’s data show. The project is seeking to borrow $7.7 billion. John Roper , a ConocoPhillips spokesman, declined to comment. Toronto-based Barrick Gold spent $4,608 on Export-Import Bank employee travel, according to the data. Vince Borg , a company spokesman, said the practice was “typical in the business.” An Indonesian joint venture involving Greenwood Village, Colorado-based Newmont Mining paid $14,000 for a staff member’s trip last April. The Export-Import Bank official was monitoring an investment it made in the Batu Hijau copper mine, company spokesman Omar Jabara said in an e-mail. Doug Norlen , policy director for Pacific Environment , a San Francisco-based group fighting the Exxon project, said the company-sponsored travel “shatters the illusion of independent due diligence.” “It’s disturbing to hear the bank doesn’t think it’s a problem for employees to be flown out and wined and dined by the company they are scrutinizing,” Norlen said in an interview. To contact the reporter on this story: Mark Drajem in Washington at mdrajem@bloomberg.net .

Read the full article →

Palmer’s Resourcehouse Wins $60 Billion Export Deal, `Australia’s Largest’

February 5, 2010

By Shani Raja and Jesse Riseborough Feb. 6 (Bloomberg) — Resourcehouse Ltd. , the iron ore and coal company controlled by Australian billionaire Clive Palmer , said it’s secured Australia’s largest export contract, worth $60 billion. The company reached a 20-year sales agreement with one of China’s largest power companies, China Power International Development Ltd., the flagship company of China Power Investment Corporation, Resourcehouse said today in an e- mailed statement that cites comments by Palmer. “This deal with CPI is Australia’s biggest export contract,” Palmer, 55, is quoted as saying in the release. The contract involves Resourcehouse’s proposed China First coal mine and infrastructure project in central Queensland state. Palmer, Australia’s fifth-richest man, aims to raise as much as $3 billion in a Hong Kong initial sale of shares in Resourcehouse, which plans to spend A$10.2 billion ($8.9 billion) to develop two mines in Australia. The company aims to supply coal and iron ore to steel mills and power companies in China, challenging producers such as BHP Billiton Ltd. According to today’s press release, Palmer said he’d awarded Queensland’s largest engineering and construction- management contract, worth more than $8 billion, to Metallurgical Corp. of China Ltd. Job Creation “There will be a huge flow-on of employment from both the construction phase through to operation of the mine, port and rail,” Resourcehouse’s Executive Director Phil McNamara is quoted in the release as saying. “There is a potential to create 50,000 to 70,000 indirect jobs in Queensland.” Metallurgical Corp. signed an accord to buy $200 million of shares in Resourcehouse on Feb. 3. The Chinese company will own no more than 5 percent of the company, and also agreed to take a 10 percent stake in the China First coal project. China, the world’s largest consumer of coal and metals, last year announced $32 billion of resource acquisitions to fuel the world’s fastest-growing major economy. The Export-Import Bank of China confirmed it’s agreed to lead financing for the coal project, today’s release said. Thermal Coal Resourcehouse has the right to mine 1.4 billion tons of soft thermal coal at China First, in the Galilee Basin in Australia’s Queensland state, Macquarie analyst Andrew Dale said in a Nov. 6 report. Palmer completed the acquisition of Waratah Coal Inc. in April for about C$98 million ($93 million) to gain control of the project. China First, scheduled to start operations in the second half of 2013 and produce as much as 40 million tons a year, may become one of the world’s largest exporters of power station coal, Macquarie said. The bank values the project at between $4.2 billion and $4.9 billion. China’s demand for coal, used to generate about 80 percent of the nation’s power, has jumped as the government’s 4 trillion yuan ($586 billion) stimulus spending drove economic growth in the third quarter to the fastest pace in a year. Resourcehouse also has the right to mine 10 billion tons of iron ore in the Pilbara region of Western Australia and has the potential to become the world’s fourth-largest iron ore producer, Macquarie said. The company’s directors include Zhengrong Shi, chief executive officer of the world’s largest maker of silicon solar panels, Suntech Power Holdings Co. , and former Australian Foreign Minister Alexander Downer. Its other interests include oil and gas in Australia and Papua New Guinea, Macquarie said. To contact the reporters on this story: Shani Raja in Sydney at sraja4@bloomberg.net . Jesse Riseborough in Melbourne at jriseborough@bloomberg.net .

Read the full article →

Lihir Gold’s Hood Quits After Four Years at Helm of Australian Mining Firm

January 17, 2010

By Jesse Riseborough Jan. 18 (Bloomberg) — Lihir Gold Ltd. , the second-largest gold mining company on the Australian Stock Exchange, said Chief Executive Officer Arthur Hood resigned. Chief Financial Officer Phil Baker will act as CEO while the company makes a “global search” for a replacement, Port Moresby, Papua New Guinea-based Lihir said today in a statement. Hood, who was CEO for four years after joining from Placer Dome Inc., had time on his contract to run, the company said. Since Hood took over in 2005, Lihir’s shares more than doubled and profit climbed 11-fold as gold surged to a record. Hood was forced to cut the value of the Ballarat gold mine in Australia by as much as $350 million last year after it failed to meet output targets. He led the A$350 million ($323 million) takeover of the company that owned the mine in 2006. “The new CEO will be looking to try and grow the business into West Africa and diversify away from Papua New Guinea,” Lyndon Fagan , an analyst at RBS Equities Australia Ltd., said today by phone from Sydney. Lihir rose 0.6 percent to A$3.31 at 10:25 a.m. in Sydney. The company has a market value of A$7.8 billion. “Lihir is now one of the world’s leading gold producers and is consistently performing very well, with excellent growth options,” Hood said. “It is therefore the right time for me to step aside to enable an orderly transition to a new CEO.” Hood’s termination package includes A$3.6 million ($3.3 million) in cash, including A$1.3 million in lieu of share rights he would have been entitled to this year had his contract run its full term, and the right to 3.5 million shares, Lihir said in the statement. Company spokesman Joe Dowling couldn’t immediately be reached for further comment. Mine Sale Lihir said in July it’s seeking to sell its Ballarat mine where it has cut production and 200 workers last April. In 2008 Lihir agreed to buy rival producer Equigold NL for A$1 billion to expand output to Africa. Hood also led the $860 million expansion of the plant at its Lihir Island mine in Papua New Guinea with construction work currently progressing. The expansion will add production of 240,000 ounces a year, the company has said. Output from the company’s mines in Papua New Guinea, Australia and Ivory Coast in 2009 was a record 1.12 million ounces, Lihir said today. The company had forecast full-year output of between 1 million and 1.2 million ounces. It will announce quarterly production figures on Jan. 22, it said. To contact the reporter on this story: Jesse Riseborough in Melbourne at jriseborough@bloomberg.net

Read the full article →

Lihir Gold Chief Hood Resigns After Four Years at Helm of Australian Miner

January 17, 2010

By Jesse Riseborough Jan. 18 (Bloomberg) — Lihir Gold Ltd. , the second-largest gold mining company on the Australian Stock Exchange, said Chief Executive Officer Arthur Hood resigned effective immediately. Chief Financial Officer Phil Baker will act as CEO while the company makes a “global search” for a replacement, Port Moresby-based Lihir said today in a statement. Hood, who was CEO for four years after joining from Placer Dome Inc., had time on his contract to run, the company said. “Lihir is now one of the world’s leading gold producers and is consistently performing very well, with excellent growth options for the future,” Hood said. “It is therefore the right time for me to step aside to enable an orderly transition to a new CEO.” Hood’s termination package includes A$3.6 million ($3.3 million) in cash, including A$1.3 million in lieu of share rights he would have been entitled this year had his contract run its full term, and the right to 3.5 million shares, Lihir said in the statement. Production from the company’s mines in Papua New Guinea, Australia and Ivory Coast in 2009 was a record 1.12 million ounces, Lihir said today. To contact the reporter on this story: Jesse Riseborough in Melbourne at jriseborough@bloomberg.net

Read the full article →

Obama Is Snubbed by Wen at Climate Summit as U.S.-China Tensions Escalate

December 18, 2009

By Kim Chipman and Nicholas Johnston Dec. 18 (Bloomberg) — President Barack Obama’s first closed-door meeting with world leaders in Copenhagen to forge an agreement to slow climate change had a notable absentee: Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao . While the U.S. leader and Wen later met privately for almost an hour, China’s premier didn’t show up for a second meeting with Obama and other leaders this afternoon, adding to speculation the world’s two biggest producers of greenhouse gases are far apart on an agreement to fight climate change. Negotiators from 193 countries are in Copenhagen for the United Nations talks, which are stuck on aid to developing countries facing damage from climate change, pollution-reduction goals and how to verify individual country’s pledges to cut harmful emissions. “I have to be honest, as the world watches us today, I think our ability to take collective action is in doubt right now and it hangs in the balance,” Obama told more than 8,000 delegates in Copenhagen earlier today, where discussions are supposed to conclude at 6 p.m. Wen, who spoke at the meeting’s morning plenary session before Obama, urged global cooperation in cutting carbon-dioxide pollution that many scientists say, if left unchecked, could lead to catastrophic climate shifts. “To meet the climate change challenge the international community must strengthen confidence, build consensus, make vigorous effort and enhance cooperation,” Wen said. No Show Wen’s absence from the morning meeting with Obama and almost 20 other world leaders stemmed from displeasure with the U.S.’s demand that all major emitters verify their actions to cut greenhouse gases blamed for global warming, said a delegate who declined to be named because of the sensitivity of the talks. The leaders at the meeting included Obama, Russian President Dmitry Medvedev , Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh , U.K. Prime Minister Gordon Brown and Japanese Prime Minister Yukio Hatoyama . China was represented by Vice Foreign Minister He Yafei . China’s Yu Qingtai , the country’s special representative on climate change, stood in for Wen in the afternoon. Charlie Rangel , a U.S. congressman and chairman of the tax- writing House Ways and Means Committee, said the U.S. and China both said the right things about fighting climate change. “The spirit of what they’re saying is encouraging, but I don’t know what it’s going to take to make it work,” Rangel said in an interview in Copenhagen. Climate Aid Obama has put $100 billion in climate aid for developing nations on the table in Copenhagen. The U.S. has said funds to help poor countries cope with climate change hinges on the willingness of major emitters such as China to allow third-party verification of its actions to cut emissions. China has said it is not fair to ask for independent verification of emission-reducing actions not funded by outside aid. “We will do our own verification,” China’s Yu Qingtai, said in a Dec. 12 interview in Copenhagen. The U.K.’s Brown is mediating between China and the U.S., according to Paul Bengo , chief of staff to Papua New Guinea Prime Minister Michael Somare . Negotiators are struggling to forge at least a political agreement in Copenhagen that would signal commitment to complete a climate change treaty next year. “China doesn’t want to give up its right to develop and the U.S. doesn’t want to put the brakes on its development,” Haimoude Ould Ahmed, a senator from Mauritania, said in an interview in Copenhagen. “The world is trapped between them.” Medvedev Talks The Copenhagen talks, which started Dec. 7, may be extended by two days, U.S. Representative Henry Waxman , a California Democrat and chairman of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, said today in Copenhagen after a meeting with officials from the 27-nation European Union. Obama is scheduled to leave later today after private meetings with leaders including Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva. He also is set to discuss a new nuclear arms treaty with Russia’s Medvedev . Obama is among almost 120 prime ministers, presidents and vice presidents in Copenhagen, representing nations accounting for 89 percent of the world’s gross domestic product. The U.S. yesterday said it would back a global fund that could be worth $100 billion by 2020 to help developing countries cope with climate change. U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said the offer is conditional on commitments from China and other nations to verification they are upholding pledges to cut carbon-dioxide emissions. Failure to get a mechanism for monitoring reductions would be a “deal breaker,” she said. Short Leash Obama, 48, arrived at the negotiations hamstrung by his own legislative priorities. Focus on health care in the U.S. Congress has left a proposed law to cap greenhouse gases on the back burner. The administration lacks a clear outline of what U.S. lawmakers would accept in any eventual treaty. “We have to have legislation,” said Frances Beinecke, head of the New York-based Natural Resources Defense Council. “He has to be mindful about not getting further out than he can take the country” without support from Congress. The talks are intended to produce a political agreement that would serve as a foundation for a legally binding treaty next year. Jairam Ramesh , India’s environment minister, and other delegates in Copenhagen were pessimistic about achieving anything more. “I don’t think even Mr. Obama can cut through the Gordian Knot here,” Ramesh said. “For developing countries it’s livelihood issues, for developed countries, lifestyle issues.” To contact the reporters on this story: Kim Chipman in Copenhagen at KChipman@bloomberg.net ; Nicholas Johnston in Copenhagen at njohnston6@bloomberg.net

Read the full article →

Obama Can Earn His Nobel Prize at Climate Talks, Environmental Groups Say

December 11, 2009

By Kim Chipman Dec. 11 (Bloomberg) — President Barack Obama had not even accepted his Nobel Prize in Oslo yesterday before environmental advocates began calling on him to earn it when he attends climate talks in Copenhagen next week. “Obama, in part, has been awarded the Nobel Prize with the expectation that he will deliver the kind of leadership necessary to get a climate treaty,” Greenpeace USA’s Damon Moglen said on Dec. 9, a day before Obama won the same prestigious award given to Al Gore two years ago for his work on climate change. “He won it, and now is the time to earn it.” The U.S. president, during his speech yesterday in Norway, warned about the dangers of climate change and called on countries to work together to confront the problem. Obama will attend the treaty negotiations in Copenhagen on Dec. 18, the last day of the meetings that started this week. He initially planned to make an appearance nine days earlier on Dec. 9. Many developing countries considered the earlier date a “thumb in the eye” to other leaders coming in the second week during the “high level” portion of the talks for a new global accord to control greenhouse-gas emissions, according to Kevin Conrad , Papua New Guinea’s special envoy for climate change. “I’m a lot more positive about a positive outcome since Obama changed his arrival date,” Conrad said in an interview yesterday. Yesterday in Oslo, at least one protester held a sign reading “Our Climate. Your Decision.” ‘Earn It’ In Copenhagen, where the United Nations is holding its 15th annual “conference of the parties,” or COP15, an international meeting on climate change, environmental groups handed out stickers reading “Obama: Win it in Oslo. Earn it at COP15.” The president’s new itinerary shows a “stepping up” of the level of seriousness in which the U.S. administration is taking the negotiations, said Jennifer Morgan , program director for climate and energy at the Washington-based World Resources Institute. “He now will be here during the time when the final decisions will be made,” she said, adding that Obama can’t merely just show up. “It’s clear he has to come to Copenhagen ready to negotiate,” Morgan said. “Heads of state do in the end negotiate when there are outstanding issues.” The Obama administration is drawing criticism at the Copenhagen gathering of 192 countries over issues including an offer to cut its heat-trapping pollution from power plants, factories and other sources about 17 percent by 2020 from 2005 levels. Chinese Criticism The U.S. goal can’t be regarded as “a remarkable or notable figure,” Chinese envoy Su Wei said Dec. 8 in Copenhagen. China, the world’s biggest greenhouse-gas emitter, has said the rich industrialized countries most responsible for the heat-trapping carbon dioxide in the atmosphere should cut emissions 40 percent by 2020. Obama’s negotiators are hindered in Copenhagen by a lack of U.S. laws that would require a national cap on greenhouse gases. Inaction in the Senate, the only U.S. body authorized to ratify treaties, leaves U.S. officials without firm guidelines about how to proceed. Todd Stern , the lead U.S. climate negotiator, said Dec. 9 that he’s hopeful lawmakers will pass a bill enabling the U.S. to boost its emissions-reduction goal. “God willing, in the spring” the U.S. will be able to report to the UN “that our target is even higher,” he said. To contact the reporter on this story: Kim Chipman in Copenhagen at KChipman@bloomberg.net .

Read the full article →

Exxon leads $15b LNG project in Papua New Guinea

December 8, 2009

Exxon leads $15b LNG project in Papua New Guinea

Read the full article →

Geithner Presses for Market-Set Exchange Rates as APEC Finance Chiefs Meet

November 11, 2009

By Shamim Adam and Chris Anstey Nov. 12 (Bloomberg) — U.S. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner said Asia-Pacific nations need “market-oriented” currencies that are in line with their economic fundamentals to encourage new sources of growth. Members of the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation group, which make up more than half of the world’s gross domestic product, must focus on strategies to boost private demand as policy makers start unwinding stimulus measures, Geithner and the finance ministers of Indonesia and Singapore wrote in a Wall Street Journal column distributed by the U.S. Treasury today. The call comes as pressure rises on China, the world’s third-largest economy, to abandon the currency’s fix to the dollar it has implemented since July 2008. A stronger yuan may help to deepen a shift in the nation’s economy toward domestic demand, away from reliance on exports, analysts say. “Market-oriented exchange rates in line with economic fundamentals will be essential in assuring the resource and sectoral shifts to match and foster the new patterns of demand,” said Geithner, Indonesia’s Sri Mulyani Indrawati and Singapore’s Tharman Shanmugaratnam . APEC finance ministers are meeting in Singapore today, before leaders from the 21-member group gather Nov. 14-15. Policy makers in a number of forums, including the Group of 20, have called this year for a shift away from global dependence on American spending and Chinese savings to address trade and investment imbalances that contributed to the financial crisis. ‘New Period’ “APEC must lay the basis for a new period of economic dynamism over the medium to long term,” the three finance chiefs said. “Depending on individual economies’ circumstances, a combination of macroeconomic policy adjustments and structural reforms will be needed.” China has maintained the yuan’s value at around 6.83 against the dollar since July 2008. European Central Bank President Jean-Claude Trichet said last week a stronger Chinese currency would help the global economy, and the International Monetary Fund has called it “significantly undervalued.” The region’s emerging economies need “deeper and more efficient” financial markets to boost investment, Geithner and his colleagues also said. Those nations must strengthen social policies such as health and retirement programs, reducing the need for precautionary savings that contribute to global imbalances, the officials wrote. APEC’s biggest economies are the U.S., Japan and China. Other members are Australia, Brunei, Canada, Chile, Hong Kong, Indonesia, Malaysia, Mexico, New Zealand, Papua New Guinea, Peru, the Philippines, Russia, Singapore, South Korea, Taiwan, Thailand, and Vietnam. To contact the reporters on this story: Shamim Adam in Singapore at sadam2@bloomberg.net ; Chris Anstey in Singapore at canstey@bloomberg.net

Read the full article →

Lihir Studies Paying First Dividend Since 2003 as Prices, Output Increase

October 13, 2009

By Liza Lin and Jesse Riseborough Oct. 14 (Bloomberg) — Lihir Gold Ltd. , the second-largest gold mining company on the Australian Stock Exchange, is considering paying its first dividend since 2003 after output and prices rose. “We are closer now than ever to start paying out regular dividends,” Chief Executive Officer Arthur Hood said today in a phone interview, citing gains in the gold price and better performance at its operations. “Now is the time you should be rewarding shareholders with potentially a combination of dividends or capital returns or both.” Gold for immediate delivery rose to a record yesterday as investors bought the precious metal to hedge against a lower dollar and a pickup in inflation. Port Moresby-based Lihir, which owns mines in Australia, Papua New Guinea and Ivory Coast, has forecast record production this year. The company may return to paying a dividend “in the not too distant future,” Hood said, without specifying a more precise timeframe. The company last paid a dividend of 2 cents per share in 2003. Lihir jumped 2.8 percent to A$3.29 at 12:45 p.m. Sydney time on the Australian stock exchange. The stock has risen 9.3 percent this year and has a market value of A$7.8 billion ($7.1 billion). The S&P/ASX 200 Index has climbed 30 percent this year. “We’ve been driving down our cost of operation over the last few years so we’ve got very high margins,” Hood said in a separate interview on Bloomberg television. Lihir produced a record 612,022 ounces of gold in the half- year to June 30 and has forecast output of between 1 million and 1.2 million ounces for the full year. Gold for immediate delivery traded at $1,066.43 an ounce at 12:46 p.m. in Sydney. It touched a record of $1,068.63 yesterday. To contact the reporters on this story: Liza Lin in Singapore at llin15@bloomberg.net ; Jesse Riseborough in Canberra at jriseborough@bloomberg.net

Read the full article →

Vivian Norris de Montaigu: Something You Should Know About Profits, Vaccines and Tort Reform

October 9, 2009

According to foodconsumer.org : Department of Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius has not only given immunity to the makers of Tamiflu and Relenza for injuries stemming from their use against swine flu, she has granted immunity to future swine flu vaccines and ‘any associated adjuvants.’ The last time the government embarked on a major vaccine campaign against a new swine flu, thousands filed claims contending they suffered side effects from the shots. This time around, they will have no recourse. The 2006 Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act (the PREP Act) allows the DHHS Secretary to invoke almost complete immunity from liability for manufacturers of vaccines and drugs used to combat a declared public health emergency. On Dec. 30, 2003, the Food and Drug Administration cleared the way for the use of an anthrax vaccine against the threat of both inhaled and skin-related anthrax. This decision resulted from the lifting of an injunction by Judge Emmett Sullivan, of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. Previously, Judge Sullivan had agreed with plaintiffs, soldiers who remain anonymous, that this vaccine was in fact “investigational,” and was being administered to troops, for an “unapproved purpose.” To date, we still do not know who was responsible for the post 9/11 distribution of anthrax through the U.S. postal service. Yet we do know which companies, and individual investors will be making profits from the non-competitive contracts awarded to them, and the government grants resulting from the multi-billion dollar increases in defense and anti-terrorism spending pushed through by the current Bush administration. In the case of anthrax, the biotechnology company, Elusys, presidential brother (and son of former president), Neil Bush, was not only on the board, he raised the venture capital in Houston for the biowarfare-technology start-up through Interlink Management, working out of his father’s office. This same presidential brother was legally barred from certain financial activities after his involvement in the S&L Silverado Savings and Loan crisis, which cost taxpayers billions to bail out. Elusys is linked to biowarfare “research” and vaccines to be tested and used to vaccinate both soldiers and civilians in the near future. Now Elusys plans to start SARS vaccine research, as well, therefore accessing even more grant and contract money from the U.S. taxpayers. Although the human deaths from anthrax and SARS were limited, the fear and financial costs related to the scare were immense. Then President George W. Bush, through provisions in the Homeland Security Act, opened the gates for billions of dollars in biotech financing. This money will eventually make its way into the pockets of those who were “at the right place at the right time,” in other words, those given access to limited inside information about which companies were well-connected, and thus, most likely to benefit and even influence, government spending. Elusys’s board member, Steven Sudovar, testified post-9/11 before Congress, helping to smooth the way for the spending increase which followed, and which benefited many Bush supporters with investments in biotechnology. Yet the most disturbing aspect of the free reign given to these companies in this new age of terrorism and fear, is that they will be able to test their medicines and vaccines on humans, even selling these same products, without any real liability if anything goes wrong. President Bush’s tort reform, begun in Texas and now virtually to the national level, ensures that these same companies are protected from costly lawsuits, which have been the consumer, and individuals’ only recourse in case of illness or death. It was during the first Gulf War that then President Bush’s advisor, John Deutsch, demanded that vaccine companies creating biowarfare vaccines for troops be protected from potentially costly lawsuits. In other words, if the guinea pigs became ill or died, no one could sue them. And as it has been proven that some adjuvants used to render vaccines “more effective” squalene for one, can seriously harm human beings, we will surely see more illnesses as a result of increasing use of vaccines overall. New technologies being used for vaccines are raking in profits for these companies. Monoclonal antibodies and the royalties are the mineral rights of the biotech/pharma world. The profit structure is even modeled on that of the oil industry — and some of the same players are involved once again. And while the companies will make more profits, they will also not have to pay if any harm is done by their products. Their good ole boy buddies took tort reform to Texas and then once in the White House took it nationwide. The Food and Drug Administration, which regulates drug approval, has a long waiting period and, until recently, strict codes of conduct for human research. This process has sped up considerably since September 11, 2001, and several companies have had their drugs put on “fast track” status and virtually pushed through to the human testing and approval stages. In some human drug and vaccine testing cases, FDA waivers are allowed for highly experimental vaccines due to circumstances related to being “at war.” Elusys, part of the Mederex group, is also benefiting from its strong Bush and FDA connections. Another Elusys board member is a former head of the FDA, virtually assuring the company that its products were pushed through, earning “fast-track” status. This company has already won millions in non-competitive bids, which include the government’s agreement to purchase the vaccines as well. Elusys came into existence only two years prior to the September 2001 anthrax poisonings by letters mailed from New Jersey. Elusys’ headquarters are based in New Jersey. The anthrax cases have yet to be solved, but one hopes that Elusys’ labs were investigated as they harbored live anthrax for making vaccines. More research needs to be done looking into the companies supplying the vaccines for the troops. As these drugs are being “fast-tracked” through the FDA, they remain experimental, and the troops become in fact, guinea pigs for the human testing phase of the vaccines. Human testing is both the most expensive and dangerous part of any drug’s life as it finds its way through the FDA to receiving approval for sales. Thus, once again, private companies and their well-connected investors, are being subsidized by the government, which is supplying troops for human testing, as they did during the first Gulf War. The new order will also include the enforcement of the utilization of a smallpox vaccine which will be administered to all soldiers and essential civilians in the Middle East, as well as to troops in South Korea. Although I am not going to advocate from my research refusing to take any and all vaccines, I do recommend that people inform themselves about tort reform and the companies making the profits. We all know big Pharma is working against Americans having universal coverage, but what many do not know is how tort reform protecting these same companies was put in place as a result of 9/11. Remain vigilant when it concerns your health and that of your children.

Read the full article →

Guinea Miners May Confront Fewer Legal Demands From Crisis-Wracked Junta

October 9, 2009

By Paul Richardson Oct. 9 (Bloomberg) — Guinea’s political crisis following the massacre of at least 130 pro-democracy demonstrators last week may force the country’s military junta to back off in disputes with mining companies. As aid dwindles and the African Union and European Union threaten sanctions, the junta likely won’t pursue legal disputes with the companies, said analyst Sebastian Spio-Garbrah . The mining industry accounts for 90 percent of exports, a fifth of economic output and much of the government’s revenue. “Plans to review pre-existing mining sector contracts may now be viewed as jeopardizing that flow of revenue and aborted,” said Spio-Garbrah, an analyst at Eurasia Group in New York. The Sept. 28 crackdown drew condemnation from France, the U.S., the EU and the United Nations. Those attacked were demanding that junta head Moussa Dadis Camara not run in Jan. 31 elections. The opposition said more than 200 people died and 150 women were raped; the UN said at least 130 were killed. Last month, before the crackdown, the government asked United Co. Rusal, the world’s largest aluminum producer, to return a bauxite and alumina complex at Friguia after a court ruled that its purchase was invalid. Bauxite is a raw material used in aluminum production. Alumina is made from bauxite ore in a step that produces the metal. The junta is also reviewing accords between the previous government and companies including AngloGold Ashanti Ltd. In December, the country told London-based Rio Tinto Group to hand over part of an iron-ore concession. ‘Harassing’ Companies Those demands may now go on the back burner, Spio-Garbrah said. “As the junta is increasingly forced to devote its attention to its own security, its gaze will be drawn away from harassing mining companies.” Russian officials held talks yesterday with their counterparts from Guinea over the future of Moscow-based Rusal’s plant in the country, Andrei Nesterenko , a spokesman for the Russian Foreign Ministry, said in a briefing broadcast on Russian state television. Alan Fine , spokesman for Johannesburg-based AngloGold, said he had no comment. Melbourne-based BHP Billiton Ltd. , the world’s largest mining company, is also building an alumina refinery in Guinea in a venture with partners including New York-based Global Alumina Corp. The political crisis may get worse before it gets better. Camara seized power on Dec. 23, a day after the death of President Lansana Conte , who had been in power for two decades. Second President Conte was only the second president to have ruled Guinea since it gained independence from France in 1958. His predecessor, Ahmed Sekou Toure , died in office in 1984. Both Toure and Conte relied on the military to suppress dissent and delay elections, leaving the army as the country’s “only truly national institution,” said Stephen Ellis , a researcher at the African Studies Centre in Leiden, the Netherlands. Signs of discord within the army’s ranks, as well as Camara’s denial of any responsibility for last week’s massacre, indicate the crisis isn’t likely to be resolved any time soon, Ellis said. “The army seems to be losing its organizational shape,” he said. “There have been reports that junior officers are not obeying seniors. If the army gets divided to the point where different factions are fighting with each other, then it’s very ominous indeed.” Localized Tensions While any escalation in the crisis would affect the operations of mining companies, the political tensions currently remain localized in the capital, Conakry, said Spio-Garbrah. The mines are situated hundreds of miles away and rail links and ports have been unaffected by the violence. Guinea holds as much as half of the world’s reserves of bauxite, more than 4 billion tons of “high-grade” iron ore, “significant” diamond and gold deposits and undetermined quantities of uranium, according to the U.S. State Department’s Web site . Still, per capita income is less than half the sub-Saharan African average of $861 and the country ranks 170th out of 182 countries on the UN’s Human Development Index , which measures life expectancy, literacy and gross domestic product per capita. Mining companies in Guinea have faced other disputes besides the ones with the government. Residents near the mines have staged protests to demand better services, in the absence of government-financed development, said Mike McGovern, an anthropologist and West Africa specialist at Yale University in New Haven, Connecticut. Power Shortages Earlier this week, demonstrators protesting power shortages in the eastern town of Siguiri prevented workers from entering AngloGold’s mine. Rio Tinto has faced similar protests, McGovern said in a phone interview yesterday. “People have been better educated in the past few years about the kind of money these companies are depositing with the state for local development,” McGovern said. “Because these development funds are going missing, we have seen this kind of reaction.” That means any respite for the mining industry provided by the current crisis may prove temporary. In the longer term, once civilian rule returns, miners face a “tougher environment” as the government seeks to increase mining royalties and taxes to reduce poverty, Spio-Garbrah said. To contact the reporter on this story: Paul Richardson in Johannesburg at pmrichardson@bloomberg.net .

Read the full article →

EU welcomes appointment of facilitator to resolve Guinea crisis

October 6, 2009

EU welcomes appointment of facilitator to resolve Guinea crisis

Read the full article →

U.N. rights chief calls for Guinea investigation

October 1, 2009

U.N. rights chief calls for Guinea investigation

Read the full article →