japanese

Ellen Brown: Why the Japanese Government Can Afford to Rebuild: It Owns the Largest Depository Bank in the World

April 1, 2011

The Japanese government can afford its enormous debt because it owns the bank that is its principal creditor. But competitors are attempting to force the bank’s privatization. If they succeed, they could propel the country into debt servitude along with other credit-strapped nations. When an IMF spokeswoman said at a news conference on March 17 that Japan has the financial means to recover from its devastating tsunami, skeptical bloggers wondered what she meant. Was it a polite way of saying, “You’re on your own?” Spokeswoman Caroline Atkinson said , “The most important policy priority is to address the humanitarian needs, the infrastructure needs and reconstruction and addressing the nuclear situation. We believe that the Japanese economy is a strong and wealthy society and the government has the full financial resources to address those needs.” Asked whether Japan had asked for IMF assistance, she said, “Japan has not requested any financial assistance from the IMF.” Skeptics asked how a country with a national debt that was over 200% of GDP could be “strong and wealthy.” In a CIA Factbook list of debt to GDP ratios of 132 countries in 2010, Japan was at the top of the list at 226%, passing up even Zimbabwe, ringing in at 149%. Greece and Iceland were fifth and sixth, at 144% and 124%. Yet Japan’s credit rating was still AA, while Greece and Iceland were in the BBB category. How has Japan managed to retain not only its credit rating but its status as the second or third largest economy in the world, while carrying that whopping debt load? The answer may be that the Japanese government has a captive funding source: it owns the world’s largest depository bank. As U.S. Vice President Dick Cheney said, “Deficits don’t matter.” They don’t matter, at least, when you own the bank that is your principal creditor. Japan has remained impervious to the speculative attacks that have crippled countries such as Greece and Iceland because it has not fallen into the trap of dependency on foreign financing. Japan Post Bank is now the largest holder of personal savings in the world, making it the world’s largest credit engine. Most money today originates as bank loans, and deposits are the magic pool from which this credit-money is generated. Japan Post is not only the world’s largest depository bank but its largest publicly-owned bank. By 2007, it was also the largest employer in Japan, and the holder of one-fifth of the national debt in the form of government bonds. As noted by Joe Weisenthal, writing in Business Insider in February 2010: Because Japan’s enormous public debt is largely held by its own citizens, the country doesn’t have to worry about foreign investors losing confidence. If there’s going to be a run on government debt, it will have to be the result of its own citizens not wanting to fund it anymore. And since many Japanese fund the government via accounts held at the Japan Post Bank — which in turn buys government debt — that institution would be the conduit for a shift to occur. That could explain why Japan Post has been the battleground of warring political factions for over a decade. The Japanese Postal Savings System dates back to 1875; but in 2001, Japan Post was formed as an independent public corporation, the first step in privatizing it and selling it off to investors. When newly-elected Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi tried to push through the restructuring, however, he met with fierce resistance. In 2004, Koizumi shuffled his Cabinet, appointed reform-minded people as new ministers, and created a new position for Postal Privatization Minister, appointing Heizo Takenaka to the post. In March 2006, Anthony Rowley wrote for Bloomberg: By privatizing Japan Post, [Koizumi] aims to break the stranglehold that politicians and bureaucrats have long exercised over the allocation of financial resources in Japan and to inject fresh competition into the country’s financial services industry. His plan also will create a potentially mouthwatering target for domestic and international investors: Japan Post’s savings bank and insurance arms boast combined assets of more than Â¥380 trillion ($3.2 trillion) . . . A $3 trillion asset pool is mouthwatering indeed. In a 2007 reorganization, the postal savings division was separated from the post office’s other arms, turning Japan Post into a proper bank. According to an October 2007 article in the Economist : The newly created Japan Post Bank will be free to concentrate on banking, and its new status will enable it to diversify into fresh areas of business such as mortgage lending and credit cards. To some degree, this diversification will also be forced upon the new bank. Some of the special treatment afforded to its predecessor will be revoked, obliging Japan Post Bank to invest more adventurously in order to retain depositors–and, ultimately, to attract investors once it lists on the stock market. That was the plan, and Japan Post has been investing more adventurously; but it hasn’t yet given up its government privileges. New Financial Services Minister Shizuka Kamei has put a brake on the privatization process, and the bank’s shares have not been sold. Meanwhile, the consolidated Post Bank has grown to enormous size, passing up Citigroup as the world’s largest financial institution; and it has been branching into new areas , alarming competitors. A March 2007 article in USA Today warned, “The government-nurtured colossus could leverage its size to crush rivals, foreign and domestic.” Before the March 2011 tsunami, that is what it appeared to be doing. But now there is talk of reverting to the neoliberal model, selling off public assets to find the funds to rebuild. Christian Caryl commented in a March 19 article in Foreign Affairs , published by the Council on Foreign Relations: As horrible as it is, the devastation of the earthquake presents Japan and its political class with the chance to push through the many reforms that the DPJ [Democratic Party of Japan] has long promised and the country so desperately needs. In other words, a chance for investors to finally get their hands on Japan’s prized publicly-owned bank, and the massive deposit base that has so far protected the economy from the attacks of foreign financial predators. The Japanese government can afford its enormous debt because the interest it pays is extremely low . For the private economy, public debt is money. A large public debt owed to the Japanese people means Japanese industries have the money to rebuild. But if Japan Post is sold off to private investors, interest rates are liable to rise, plunging the government into the debt trap it has so far largely escaped. The Japanese people are intensely patriotic, however, and they are not likely to submit quietly to domination by foreigners. They generally like their government, because they feel it is serving their interests. Hopefully the Japanese government will have the foresight and the fortitude to hang onto its colossal publicly-owned bank and use it to leverage its people’s savings into the credit needed to rebuild its ravaged infrastructure, avoiding a crippling debt to foreign interests. A longer version of this article was published by Asia Times on March 31, 2011.

Read the full article →

Robert Lenzner: Turning Dirty Coal in China Into Clean Natural Gas

March 31, 2011

The future of a technology that converts dirty cheap coal into clean natural gas for transportation fuel was underscored last night by a Chinese investment in Synthesis Energy Systems (SYMX,NASDAQ), a small Houston company that holds a valuable license for this transforming technology. The transaction is significant because it comes to fruition in the wake of crisis over nuclear energy signified by damage to the Japanese nuclear plant sending radioactive particles to China, and at a time of political unrest in the Middle East, when crude oil is priced well above $100 a barrel. And it underscores the crucial need to utilize an abundance of dirty coal in China and Mongolia as a clean energy source for the fastest growing economy in the world. The investment by China Energy and its investment arm Zhongjinuan Investment Management, a private company in Beijing, can be leveraged into $3.0 billion capital investments in new gasification plants with financing from some later-to-be identified state-owned companies, according to Robert Rigdon, SYMX chief executive officer, calling from Beijing last night. “The current energy landscape supports the use of low quality coal,” Rigdon emphasized last night. The $83.5 million is being raised from private Chinese investors, in a transaction that is unique for the manner in which Chinese investors will now be on the way to controlling a technology in gasification of coal that was originated in the US. The deal for 43.5% of SYMX at $2.25 a share can be increased to 60% in 8 years, giving the Chinese ultimate control of the U.S. company and a valuable hold on a technology that is held by the Gas Technological Institute. SYMX stock has been trading at a volume multiple its usual activity the last several days. The transaction will undoubtedly be seen as a model for other such strategies that could help the Chinese slow down their plans to build dozens of new nuclear power plants. SES(SYMX) has a 10 year exclusive license to the technology, which can be extended further. It already has a plant producing methanol in China and has plans to produce both methanol and and glycol in another facility. Methanol and glycol are used as blending agents for gasoline fuel, according to Rigdon.

Read the full article →

Oil Prices, Japan Holding U.S. Auto Sales Back

March 29, 2011

By Ben Klayman DETROIT (Reuters) – U.S. auto sales in March are expected to rise about 12 percent from last year’s depressed levels, but high gasoline prices and production problems caused by the Japanese earthquake could slow a recovery, analysts and investors said. Auto sales represent one of the first snapshots every month of U.S. consumer demand, and while an increase from last year is expected, lower incentives will likely mean a decline from February. However, that does not scare investors who like the industry’s recovery story. “Gas prices and disruptions with the Japanese earthquake are relevant, we pay attention to them, but it doesn’t change the medium- or longer-term backdrop of there being some compelling fundamentals for new-car sales,” said Walter Stackow, a senior research analyst with Manning & Napier. Stackow, whose firm owns shares in BMW (BMWG.DE: Quote, Profile, Research, Stock Buzz), Suzuki (7269.T: Quote, Profile, Research, Stock Buzz) and several dealers, cited the average age of cars topping 10 years, sales trailing the rate at which people scrap older vehicles, the rising cost of used cars and the improving financing market as reasons for longer-term optimism. Automakers are set to report March auto sales on Friday. March is traditionally a stronger sales month than February, but lower incentive spending by General Motors Co (GM.N: Quote, Profile, Research, Stock Buzz), Toyota Motor Corp (7203.T: Quote, Profile, Research, Stock Buzz) and others likely resulted in a lower growth rate than February’s stronger-than-expected 27 percent gain, analysts said. For the sixth consecutive month, sales on an annualized basis are expected to top 12 million vehicles in March. The average forecast of 34 economists surveyed by Reuters was 13.2 million vehicles on that basis, up from 11.78 million last year, but off slightly from 13.4 million in February. J.D. Power and Associates expects a 9 percent increase in March sales, while TrueCar.com and Edmunds.com estimate gains of 12 percent and 16 percent, respectively. PAIN AT THE PUMP Despite the expected sales increase, rising oil prices and the resulting pain at the pump could push consumers away from more lucrative light trucks, analysts said. J.P. Morgan analyst Himanshu Patel estimated in a research note that each $1 increase in the U.S. retail price of gas results in a 5 percentage-point shift toward lower-margin cars for the industry. Light truck sales, which include pickup trucks and sport utility vehicles, make up a little more than half of U.S. auto sales and account for a disproportionate share of profits at the U.S. automakers because of their higher prices. Gas prices rose more than 3 cents to $3.60 a gallon over the last week, the Energy Department said. The average price of regular gas is 80 cents higher than a year ago as conflict in Libya and rising tensions in the Middle East have sent the cost of crude oil to above $100 a barrel. “I don’t think at these levels it’s going to affect car sales,” said Gary Bradshaw, a portfolio manager with Hodges Capital Management, which owns Ford shares. “The auto recovery is still intact,” he added. “I still think we’ll see 13 (million) to 13-1/2 million cars sold in this country this year, but if oil (hits) $125 a barrel then all bets may be off.” Another focus is the aftermath of the Japanese earthquake and subsequent tsunami earlier this month that caused many supplier plants there to close or cope with power outages. GM, Ford, Toyota, Honda, Nissan and other automakers have all idled plants or scheduled downtime at facilities because of the parts shortages. Even a shortage of a specialty pigment that gives cars a glittering shine prompted Chrysler Group LLC (FIA.MI: Quote, Profile, Research, Stock Buzz) and Ford Motor Co (F.N: Quote, Profile, Research, Stock Buzz) to temporarily restrict orders on vehicles in certain shades of black, red and other colors. The parts shortages may cut global vehicle output 30 percent within six weeks in a worst-case scenario, research firm IHS Automotive said. Most analysts do not see the shortages affecting March sales much, but if it continues, April or May sales could be hurt because there will be fewer cars on dealer lots to sell. Deals for consumers are already drying up as TrueCar estimated the industry’s average incentive spending per vehicle in March would drop 6 percent from February to $2,432, driven by declines of 17 percent and 11 percent at GM and Toyota, respectively. Edmunds sees a 9.5 percent drop. (Reporting by Ben Klayman in Detroit; Editing by Maureen Bavdek) Copyright 2011 Thomson Reuters. Click for Restrictions

Read the full article →

Robert Teitelman: More on Private vs. Public

March 28, 2011

Felix Salmon has been continuing his discussion of companies avoiding public listings to stay private. I posted on this when he first wrote about the trend in The New York Times last month, and he has since picked up a variety of fellow kibitzers, including here and here ; some of his commenters also have a few interesting things to say. The issue has now broadened into related issues, notably the decline in initial public offerings, particularly of startups, something Treasury’s Timothy Geithner publicly started worrying about recently . Although it’s very clear that a fall-off in IPOs does translate into more startups remaining private or getting gobbled up by strategic buyers, I’m not convinced that, despite the kerfuffle over Facebook remaining private, the underlying issues are the same. A big part of the IPO problem seems to stem from a reduced appetite by U.S. venture capital investors for traditional tech startups after the dot-com bust, a shift toward mezzanine investments in more established companies and a move to place VC money overseas, particularly in Asia. That may speak more to a) the long recovery of venture investing from the dot-com bubble; b) better opportunities overseas; or c) a maturity in large tech markets, of the sort Tyler Cowan wrote about in ” The Great Stagnation .” The decline of IPOs is worrisome, but not for the reasons Salmon talks about: that the great mass of investing Americans will lack investment opportunities, particularly compared with plutocrats tapping hedge funds and buyout shops. It’s a concern because a lack of IPOs will result in a shift toward a larger, more concentrated, less nimble corporate economy. Salmon brings a variety of assumptions to the table. First, there are historical assumptions about a sort of glorious age when most Americans had defined-benefit plans and played in bountiful stock markets. “In America,” Salmon writes, “for pretty much all of the 20th Century, and in the rest of the world today, public markets have shown themselves to be a very good thing when it comes to value creation.” There’s a lot there that’s arguable. Salmon particularly seems to be reading back into history the bull market in stocks that began building after World War II (and that relatively few Americans took advantage of until the ’80s), then continued along, with a few interruptions (some considerable, like the ’70s) until the 21st century, which so far has been generally lousy. Lots of Americans reaped stock market value in the ’20s, lost it in the ’30s, then had to wait until the ’50s to begin to catch up. Through the ’50s and ’60s, most shareholding was individual, but it came from a very narrow slice of upper crust society — and it was mediated by brokers who took, by current standards, huge fixed commissions. Institutions, including pension funds, only began to buy stocks in the late ’50s. The “value creation” of stocks might have existed, based on the rise of the market, but relatively few Americans got rich off it and, relative to today, there were a lot fewer public stocks to play. As for the rest of the world, well, Salmon sees a different world than I do. Most of the world’s population has probably never heard of a listed stock. There are relatively few economies that have broad and sophisticated equity cultures that are open to the great mass of people. Even Europe has only developed one in the past few decades, and given its social welfare system, participation in share ownership remains relatively small. For decades the Japanese invested regularly in postal savings accounts, not a stock market that was viewed, with good reason, as dangerously volatile and perhaps crooked. Are ordinary Russians investing in the stock market? Are the great mass of Chinese? Are Indonesians and Indians? Many of these countries have the same relationship to the stock market that America had when it was emerging: It’s a kind of game for those with large amounts of disposable income. The rest of the population mostly lacks the savings, the skills and the risk profile to participate. Now it may be true that the Chinese would all like to invest regularly in the stock market because they are optimistic about the future. (A broad ownership society, in which millions own stock, does generate political repercussions that might make authoritarian governments wary: a sense of ownership, to be sure, but an increasing need to be sensitive to the personal financial needs of a mass rentier class.) But that doesn’t mean investing in equities is a widespread practice. Salmon intones the venerable mantra that stocks over the long term will outpace bonds. That is certainly true; we’ve all consulted our Ibbotson. But as everyone also painfully knows by now, particularly if you’re approaching retirement, value creation is relative to the time frame of the individual. Stocks may be swell over the long term, but they’re risky over the short term. Every 30 years or so, we seem to submerge into decade-long torpor — or worse. And stock markets, particularly when they fall, easily get charged with being a rigged game. Often, that’s actually true, particularly in markets around the world with thin floats and spotty regulation. As we know, even mature systems suffer from regulatory woes. This leads to a second and related assumption, which is that the underlying problem of this swing toward private ownership is inequality: The rich folks get the good stuff, leaving the rest of us the dregs. This seems to me, at best, overstated, at worst, wrong. The overstated part stems from the numbers Salmon seems to believe are hiding out in the private sphere and are thus inaccessible to ordinary investors. It’s true. There is a large and vigorous private equity industry out there. But it’s also true that most of what occurs in private equity happens not among the biggest public companies — that was a phenomenon of 2005 to 2007, now over — but in the middle market. A healthy percentage of LBOs in the middle market are buyouts of already private companies. Some of these companies will eventually be acquired by large public companies, a traditional exit. Some will be sold off to other buyout shops. Others will be taken public. Indeed, the IPO market would really be moribund if not for the large numbers of PE-owned companies re-entering the public markets, including giants like HCA. One way or the other, most of these take-privates will end up as at least part of a public equity. Again, I think there’s confusion here between the dearth of tech IPOs and the growth of private equity. Their dynamics are different. A startup that gets no funding will probably never go public. A company that’s LBO’d is taken out of the public ranks, but eventually will return, acquired by either a strategic buyer, undoubtedly public, or by public investors. Arguing that private equity is removing good opportunities out of the public markets is like decrying M&A for reducing the number of companies. The real problem here is not M&A or PE; it’s the deficient creation and financing of new companies. It is true that the allure of a public listing isn’t what it used to be. You can blame Sarbanes-Oxley, although I think that’s exaggerated; and eliminating it to grease the skids may have little effect. I would argue two other considerations come into play, particularly in a situation where there’s plenty of equity capital to go around (raising the possibility that both inequality and the private economy are somehow linked to increasing affluence). They’re related. First, it’s corporate governance, particularly the difficulty of aligning shareholder and managerial interests and the ineffectiveness of shareholder monitoring. In short, the promise of shareholder democracy has not been fulfilled, creating, if anything, dysfunction and distraction. Second, it’s compensation. Managers can make more in private situations in which shareholders are compact and aligned. Pay is almost never an issue on the private side. To link all this to inequality also raises difficult questions. The roots of inequality are complex and much debated. The rise of private equity, not to say hedge funds and big finance, may well have contributed to that inequality. But blaming inequality on too many companies staying private — and thus offering opportunities only for plutocrats — is like saying the financial crisis was caused by too much compensation. The fact is there are a dozen explanations, from rapid technological change to the passing of the industrial age to an inequitable tax structure to technological maturity that may explain deepening inequality. Conversely, to tackle inequality by focusing strictly on preserving public markets to some optimal, perhaps mythical level is useless. Again, in the golden age of American equality — the ’50s — there was little involvement, active or passive (meaning through pension funds), in the stock market for the great mass of Americans. Finance was much smaller, and while opportunities in the market were “public,” they were strictly limited by income. Perhaps this is what Salmon anticipates by supporting a market transaction tax, to reduce turnover and encourage longer-term investment. The trouble here is that a smaller finance, a simpler finance, would generate less liquidity and less opportunity for everyone – and whether that would produce a more equitable society is possible, if not certain. The kind of tech creation that Salmon favors might well be diminished; innovation, which perches on the riskier end of the spectrum, might well be among the first to go. It’s unfortunately easier to create equality by leveling down than by leveling up.

Read the full article →

Nuclear Industry Insists New Reactors Are Safe

March 28, 2011

OLKILUOTO, Finland — Halfway around the globe from Japan’s atomic emergency, engineers building a cutting-edge nuclear reactor along Finland’s icy shores insist the same crisis could never happen here. And that’s not only because Finland is seismically stable. The 1,600-megawatt European Pressurized Reactor projected to come online in 2013 in Olkiluoto, 195 miles (315 kilometers) northwest of Helsinki, is the first of its kind expected to begin operating after the Japanese disaster. It has walls thick enough to withstand an airplane crash, components designed to tolerate the extreme cold of the Nordic winter, and decades worth of new safety systems. “(We have) so many backup systems that the kind of accident like in Japan could not happen,” said project manager Jouni Silvennoinen. With the renaissance of nuclear power at stake, the atomic industry faces the challenge of persuading an increasingly skeptical public that new reactors like the EPR units being built by French company Areva in Finland, France and China are not just safer than the old ones but are virtually disaster-proof. The state-controlled company has marketed its expensive new-generation reactor technology to the United States and developing countries from India to Saudi Arabia and Brazil. Since news of Japan’s catastrophe, Areva’s shares have fallen 12.4 percent, trading at euro31.49 midday Friday. Areva CEO Anne Lauvergeon has said an EPR plant would have survived the earthquake and tsunami without radiation leaks. And French Energy Minister Eric Besson, whose country gets up to 80 percent of its electricity from nuclear power, insisted last week it was his “profound conviction that nuclear energy will stay in Europe and the world and be one of the core energies in the 21st century.” But that’s a tough message to sell, with explosions and radiation leaks at the Fukushima Dai-ichi plant in Japan eroding confidence in nuclear power. That confidence took decades to rebuild following the Soviet Chernobyl disaster in 1986 and the 1979 Three Mile Island accident in Pennsylvania. Shocked by the Japanese crisis, the European Union has called for “stress tests” for its 143 reactors. Germany – the EU’s biggest economy – has temporarily suspended plans to prolong the life of its aging nuclear plants and had already planned to abandon nuclear power altogether over the next 25 years. President Barack Obama, while expressing support for nuclear power, requested a comprehensive review of the safety of U.S. plants. Even China, which plans a massive expansion of nuclear energy, has said it will hold off on approving new nuclear plants to allow for a revision in safety standards. Suggesting that third-generation reactors like the EPR would have withstood the shock that crippled the Japanese plant is “sheer arrogance,” said Mycle Schneider, an independent researcher on France’s nuclear industry. “There’s no way we can say today that any plant in the world would have survived what happened in Japan,” he said. At the Fukushima plant, which began operating in 1971, the massive earthquake and tsunami damaged the critical cooling system, which overheated and began spewing radiation into the environment. For the first time, nuclear engineers were forced to head off a total reactor meltdown at three reactors simultaneously as well as dealing with overheating fuel rods in a damaged storage pool at a fourth reactor. So how could a modern reactor have avoided those problems? The principle of power generation is the same as in older high-pressure water reactors like the ones at Fukushima: nuclear reaction heats water to create steam that turns turbines to generate electricity. But technological advances have improved efficiency and stricter safety precautions have made the third-generation reactors more secure, industry officials say. New EPR plants have backup systems like diesel generators that are housed in separate buildings to protect them from any accident that might occur in the main reactor building. The plant must also have access to other sources of electricity, like gas turbines or the national grid, if the diesel generators fail to work. At Olkiluoto, four large diesel generators act as a backup if the first step of connecting to the national grid proves unsuccessful. If they don’t work, two smaller diesel generators kick in, and failing that, the new reactor can be connected to the joint backup systems of two older reactors at Olkiluoto. There are also new “protective barriers” shielding the environment from radioactive products used in the reactor. These include encasing the fuel rods in thick metal containers and having a double concrete cover and walls over the containment vessel that houses the reactor. Besides natural disasters, modern reactors worldwide must be able to withstand terror strikes and – since 9/11 – even a large airliner crash, Silvennoinen said. Situated just 200 yards (meters) from the frozen Baltic Sea, the Olkiluoto nuclear plant is elevated so that it can withstand storm surges of up to 11 feet (3.5 meters), which is considered a worst-case scenario. During a recent visit, dozens of workers in yellow vests clambered up and down stairs of the concrete buildings bordering the cylinder-shaped reactor as construction cranes swerved over its domed roof. Since Olkiluoto is the first EPR scheduled to become operational, it has been seen as a flagship for the latest generation of nuclear reactors. But the project has been plagued by faulty materials and planning problems since construction began in 2005, and it’s now running four years behind schedule. The nearby town of Eurajoki, population 6,000, in the middle of Finland’s sparsely populated countryside, has welcomed the project. It has created 4,000 jobs, even though 70 percent of them went to foreign workers. Teijo Jantunen, who lives near the town, 10 miles (16 kilometers) from Olkiluoto, conceded that the problems at Fukushima had made him think about the possibility of a nuclear accident. “But I’m not really very worried. I’m confident it will be a good plant,” said Jantunen, a 57-year-old construction manager. “I trust them despite everything.” Leo Mantymaki, who lives 6 miles (10 kilometers) away, doesn’t quite know what to believe. “They tell us that a Japan-like accident couldn’t happen here, but I’m not so sure,” the retired welder said, sitting on a tractor as he took a break from clearing snow. “What if they press the wrong button?” Jukka Laaksonen, director of Finland’s Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority, stressed that safety features must be designed according to local conditions, and said a major flaw at Fukushima was that its seawall was too low. “EPR has much better safety systems than old similar plants but having a good plant is not enough,” Laaksonen said. “You also have to pay attention to the site conditions. If the EPR is not properly protected against a tsunami … then you never know what will happen.” _______ Associated Press writer Angela Charlton in Paris contributed to this report.

Read the full article →

Raymond J. Learsy: Nuclear Nay-Sayers and the National Interest

March 28, 2011

The events in Japan as they relate to issues of nuclear energy have been an urgent and important clarion call to all regarding the safety of our nuclear facilities and the role nuclear energy will play in our energy future. It is an issue of vital importance to the nation given its impact on global warming, national security and the economy. It is an issue that needs be examined openly and not simply left to those who are pre-programmed to present us with the familiar saws railing against nuclear energy with the tailwind of current events at their back. Almost the first out-of-the-box of nuclear energy dismissal was Rep. Ed Markey (D-Mass.) who on March 13, but two days after the tsunami hit Japan, set forth a list of nuclear policy objectives ranging from a call to imposing a moratorium on siting new reactors to requiring a review of the U.S. Department of Energy’s loan guarantee program, without which the construction of new facilities would be brought to a screeching halt. All points certainly to be put on the table, but Markey’s haste to be out front bespeaks where he is coming from. His views were more succinctly enunciated but a week later on March 20th speaking to ‘ Face the Nation ‘, he was quoted: “the nuclear industry as an electrical-generating part of our mix for the future” would likely “meet its maker” in light of the recent tragedy in Japan. Coming from the ranking member of the house Energy and Commerce Committee one can well imagine what lies ahead. Then we have Mr. Gregory Jaczko, head of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission testifying before the Energy and Commerce Committee about the nuclear situation in Japan. His testimony was broadcast around the world and fueled growing criticism of Japan’s government handling of events while frightening all who were paying attention. The New York Times would banner headline its first page on March 17, ” U.S. Sees ‘Extremely High’ Radiation Level at Plant, Focusing on Spent Fuels Impact ” and went on to write “More Dire Appraisal of Crisis Creates Split With Japan.” In these situations perhaps it is best to err on the side of caution. Yet in the retrospect of now twelve days since Jaczko’s testimony, it would appear the Japanese assessment was closer to the mark. Interestingly Gregory Jaczko worked as a Congressional Science Fellow on Representative Markey’s staff. Jaczko also seved as Senator Harry Reid’s science policy advisor. And therein lies the rub. Senator Harry Reid (D-Nev), probably more than anyone in public office has slowed down to a virtual halt the expansion of nuclear power in the United States (not a single nuclear power plant has been built here since the late 1970′s) by forcing the shutdown of the multi-billion Yucca Mountain, Nevada repository project for nuclear waste. In doing so he enormously complicated the siting of new plants and the safe handling of spent fuels, an issue now again in laser-like focus in response to the Japanese disaster. Without a program to effectively deal with nuclear waste, pools holding spent fuels at nuclear plants in the United States are even more heavily loaded than those at the Japanese reactors. Yet no plan has emerged to replace the Yucca Mountain repository, ( NYTimes : ” Japan Nuclear Crisis Reviving Long U.S. Fight On Spent Fuel ” 03.24.11). Certainly at Harry Reid’s insistence, President Obama told his Department of Energy to withdraw their application for the construction license for Yucca Mountain facility that was submitted to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). When the Energy Department sought withdrawal of their license application last June, a panel of three administrative law judges maintained there was no provision in law to do so and rejected the NRC’s request to withdraw. The issue was automatically appealed to the full five member NRC . With one commissioner having recused himself the NRC voted 2-to-2 leaving the commission deadlocked thereby failing to override the panel of judges ruling. Thus the administrative judges’ ruling was left to stand. However Commission Chairman Jaczko has refused to bring the matter to a final vote, continuing to leave the issue unsettled, much to the consternation of many in Congress, not to speak of the utility industry and raising the question altogether, to whose benefit? Solution to the waste disposal problem has been under endless examination. Some years ago this writer proposed, at risk of being pilloried, siting such a facility in northern Alaska much in keeping with the effectively resolved Russian depots on the Novaya Zemlya archipelago in the Northern Arkhangelsk region (please see ” Nuclear Waste: ‘Not in My Backyard!’ Then Whose? ” 07.07.06) Another crucial initiative that could play a major role and has in many national nuclear programs such as that of France as but one example, is the reprocessing of spent fuel to recover plutonium produced in uranium powered reactors for reuse as reactor fuel. It is an issue that has been off the table in the U.S. since the 70′s when Jimmy Carter banned the process because of proliferation concerns (please see ” Climate Change and Nuclear Energy: America’s Missed Opportunity “, 12.13.09). Certainly the benefits and risks inherent in a nuclear energy program are enormous. It is important for the nation’s future when all is said and done, in spite of the current reaction to events in Japan, that the benefits attributable to nuclear energy are given temperate and fair consideration in all policy assessments.

Read the full article →

Nearly A Tenth Of Japanese Farmland Affected By Tsunami, AP Says

March 26, 2011

SENDAI, Japan — The rice paddies on the outskirts of this tsunami-hit city are ankle-deep in a black, salty sludge. Crumpled cars and uprooted trees lie scattered across them. His house destroyed, rice farmer Shinichi Shibasaki lives on a square of blue tarp on the top floor of a farming cooperative office with others like him. He has one set of soiled clothes. But all he can think about is getting back to work. “If we start washing the soil out now, we can start growing our rice seedlings at the end of April at a different location, and plant them here a month later,” the 59-year-old farmer said. That may prove overly optimistic, but agriculture experts – as well as Indonesian farmers hit by a tsunami in 2004 – say a quick recovery is possible, maybe within a year. A key factor will be how long it takes for the salt to wash out from the fields, some still flooded with seawater. Whenever it comes, the return of bright green stalks swaying in the breeze will be a symbol of rebirth. The affected area may represent only a small part of Japan’s overall production, but rice is a spiritual touchstone in this country. The nation’s soul – despite a modern fascination with all things high-tech – remains rooted in the soil. In the name of preserving tradition, Japan’s mostly small-scale rice farmers are heavily protected from cheaper foreign competition. The emperor plants and harvests symbolic stalks every year, and some city dwellers rent small plots to grow rice on the edge of town. The country’s mythology is filled with references to rice, and the written character for “rice field” forms part of many surnames. In the small city of Natori, Akemi Miura can only laugh as she looks at the land around her home, which her family has worked for more than a century. But the 46-year-old says they will replant, though she thinks it will take a few years for the soil to recover. A fishing boat washed more than a mile (1.5 kilometers) inland smashed into her carnation greenhouse and caught fire. Debris and a thick, sticky mud covers the fields. “I think we’re finished with carnations, but we’ll always grow rice,” she says. There are no official estimates yet of how much farmland was affected. The Associated Press made a rough calculation based on last year’s harvest in tsunami-hit towns. It indicates that at most 8 percent of Japan’s 4 million acres (1.6 million hectares) of rice farms has been hit, affecting about 4 percent of total production. Makie Kokubun, a professor at Tohoku University in Sendai, will soon accompany government officials on a trip to take samples and analyze the soil. Japan’s coastal farmland has been damaged by salt from major typhoons in the past, and farmers have been able to flush it clean. “Recovery may be faster than some think. The key is the water flow through the land, which varies by region,” he said. “There is also some evidence that light salt can actually help crops grow, though this is obviously in far greater amounts.” The 2004 tsunami ravaged rice fields in Indonesia’s Aceh province, and scientists made dire predictions of years without a crop. But many recovered quickly. “Thank God, we were able to harvest rice just one year after the tsunami decimated my rice fields,” said Sulaiman Abdullah, 55, who farms a third of an acre (1,300 square meters) in the village of Beuradeuen. “And the quality is even better than it was before, maybe because the mud, garbage and sea water brought in by the wave made the land more fertile,” he added. “The same tsunami that first destroyed our lives was in the end a blessing of sorts.” Even if the soil recovers, farmers in Fukushima prefecture – known for the light and sticky “koshihikari” strain of rice preferred by many Japanese – face another problem. Radiation from a damaged nuclear power complex has found its way into vegetables, milk and the water supply. Japanese consumers are notoriously fickle about food safety and may shun Fukushima products, even if health experts say the radiation is not a threat. Up and down the tsunami-ravaged coast, a greater concern may be manpower. Many of the tsunami victims came from coastal families that have farmed for generations. Here in Miyagi prefecture, the state that includes Sendai and Natori, farmland was converted from swamps about 400 years ago to generate funds for the local ruler. But the younger generation increasingly doesn’t want to farm. The average age of farm workers in Miyagi topped 65 last year, according to a prefectural survey. Now some older farmers, their homes gone and land in tatters, are saying they will call it quits. “I’m worried that a lot of these elderly farmers are just going to leave their fields and not come back,” said Masao Takahashi, an official in the Miyagi office of the Japan Agricultural Cooperatives, a politically powerful national network of farming groups. In Natori, 60-year-old rice farmer Kikuo Endo points to a shed full of ruined farm equipment, which he estimates was worth 10 million yen ($125,000). He doesn’t know if insurance will cover it. “People shouldn’t give up, but I don’t think I will farm again,” he says. “It’s time to pass the baton to the next generation.” There may not be one. His three sons, he said, have abandoned the fields and moved to the city. ___ Associated Press writer Fakhrurradzie Gade in Beuradeuen, Indonesia, contributed to this story.

Read the full article →

Video: First Eagle’s Brooker Recommends Switzerland’s Pargesa

March 25, 2011

March 25 (Bloomberg) — Kimball Brooker, a portfolio manager at First Eagle Investment Management, talks about his investment strategy. Brooker also discusses Japanese stocks. He speaks with Matt Miller on Bloomberg Television’s “Street Smart.” (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Video: Biggs Sees U.S. Stocks Rallying Back to February Highs

March 22, 2011

March 22 (Bloomberg) — Barton Biggs, managing partner at hedge fund Traxis Partners, talks about the outlook for U.S. stocks. Biggs says equities will probably rise back to their 2011 peak reached in February. Biggs also discusses Japanese stocks, his investment strategy and the outlook for Federal Reserve monetary policy. He speaks with Carol Massar and Matt Miller on Bloomberg Television’s “Street Smart.” (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Robert Lenzner: The Double Whammy Of Libya And Japan Mean Higher Oil Prices

March 22, 2011

Further escalation of the Libyan conflict is “a much greater threat to the global financial markets than the radiation leaks in Japan,” writes CLSA’s Christopher Wood this morning. Add in further interest rate tightening in China and the World Bank prediction that it will take 5 years to rebuild Japanese infrastructure and you’ve got the recipe for a slower global economy. Wall Street is just waking up to the aftershock of the Japanese earthquake and tsunami — the global supply chain of just-in-time delivery of electronic and auto parts from Japan. The basis of much productivity and profit gains in recent years has been severely interrupted. Industrial production of batteries, circuit boards and parts for Toyota and Nissan autos will cause a slowdown in global commerce. No doubt about it. The only trade Streettalk sees good as gold is crude oil, which is already up 17.62% in a month. I’d be long crude oil futures and global producers away from the Middle East. And for good measure I’d own a coal producer like Peabody Energy, which is bound to profit from the blow to nuclear power, and the rising cost of oil. You’re looking at unrest rolling across the region; demonstrations in Syria, a state of emergency in Yemen, a Day of Rage Protest in Saudi Arabia and he little understood prospect of continuing risks in the oil producing areas of Kuwait and Saudi Arabia where Shiite population present a threat to stability. What’s more: crude oil demand in the US rose 4.4% last month, further indication of a recovering economy. Add in the very real blow to nuclear power prospects by the the existence of iodine and cesia in the Tokyo tap water and the uncertainty of getting the reactors in northern Japan completely under control and in repair. This Japanese meltdown has reduced electric power in Japan. It has caused the Chinese to review plans for their building of 37 additional nuclear plants and caused the Germans to review the safety provisions of 7 nuclear facilities. Face it: the conflagration in Libya will be over soon. But the entire Middle East will never be the same. The new $67 billion Saudi royal family bribe for popular support is a bloody sign of weakness. The only timetable you can count on is an uneven, long lasting period of political volatility that will thrust oil prices up in fits and starts. Be long oil. Probably be long gold and silver as well, as the charts for both precious metals are in remarkable tandem. You must protect yourself against the unleashing of political and social unrest through oil producing regions: Libya, Iran, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, the Emirates.

Read the full article →

GM Lays Off Workers, Halts Some Production

March 21, 2011

DETROIT — General Motors Co. on Monday is halting some production and temporarily laying off workers at a Buffalo, N.Y., engine plant, another sign that Japan’s disaster is affecting automakers around the globe. GM’s Tonawanda plant in Buffalo makes four- and five-cylinder engines for the Chevrolet Colorado and GMC Canyon compact pickups, which are assembled at a GM plant in Shreveport, La. GM has shut down the Shreveport plant this week because of a shortage of parts from Japan. GM spokeswoman Kim Carpenter Carpenter said Tonawanda has the parts it needs to make the engines, but it’s not producing the engines because Shreveport doesn’t need them. She said GM doesn’t know when production will resume at either plant. Carpenter said 59 of the 623 workers at the engine plant will be affected. Workers will get around 75 percent of their pay while they’re laid off. GM hasn’t said which parts are affected in Louisiana. Automakers tend to withhold such information for competitive reasons. GM uses a five-speed manual transmission made by Japanese supplier Aisin Seiki Co. in the Canyon and Colorado, but Aisin said last week that it has enough transmissions and parts to continue supplying GM and hasn’t shut down any of its plants in North America. So far, GM is the only U.S.-based automaker to be affected by parts shortages. Ford Motor Co. and Chrysler Group LLC said Monday that they haven’t slowed production but are monitoring the situation. Also Monday, GM slowed production of its Corsa compact car in Europe because of a shortage of parts. GM cancelled two of the three shifts at its Eisenach, Germany, plant and closed another plant in Zaragoza, Spain. GM said last week it was cutting unnecessary spending companywide as it assesses the impact of production disruptions from the March 11 earthquake and tsunami in Japan.

Read the full article →

Video: LVAM’s Hillier Favors Equities Over Treasuries on Japan

March 21, 2011

March 21 (Bloomberg) — Piers Hillier, chief investment officer at Liverpool Victoria Asset Management, talks about the outlook for Japanese equities and his investment strategy. He speaks with Francine Lacqua on Bloomberg Television’s “On The Move.”

Read the full article →

The Japanese Crisis dominates the course of events in Asia and across the globe

March 20, 2011

The Japanese Crisis dominates the course of events in Asia and across the globe

Read the full article →

Japanese Government Plans To Aid Struggling Businesses

March 19, 2011

(Reuters) – The Japanese government plans to dedicate up to 10 trillion yen ($127 billion) in crisis lending to businesses to help them finance day-to-day operations and repair damage from last week’s deadly earthquake and tsunami, the Nikkei newspaper reported on Saturday. The government can provide special financing in the form of low-interest loans or interest payment subsidies backed by public funds when a natural disaster or other event triggers major economic instability, the Nikkei said. The newspaper, without citing any sources, said that the government was considering allocating several trillion yen and up to 10 trillion yen to the scheme. Funds needed to support the scheme would be set aside in an emergency budget. The government looks certain to need an extra budget to fund disaster relief and reconstruction after the triple blow of a massive 9.0 magnitude earthquake, a tsunami and a dangerous radiation leak at a quake-crippled nuclear plant. The authorities, struggling to contain the nuclear crisis, have yet to produce an estimate of how much government spending would be needed to help the economy get back on its feet. Economics Minster Kaoru Yosano told Reuters in an interview earlier this week that the economic damage from the disaster would exceed 20 trillion yen, which was his estimate of the total economic impact of the 1995 earthquake in Kobe. Yosano said government spending was likely to exceed the 3.3 trillion yen Tokyo spent after Kobe, which up to now has been considered the world’s costliest natural disaster. On Friday, the Sankei newspaper said that the government planned to issue more than 10 trillion yen in emergency bonds to pay for the reconstruction and that the central bank would fully underwrite the issue. But Yosano and other government officials denied the report, saying no such plan was in place. The Nikkei said the government was also discussing creating a recovery fund that would provide medium- to long-term lending for firms directly hit by the disaster. However, setting up such a fund would require several changes to the law. (Reporting by Tomasz Janowski; Editing by Nathan Layne) Copyright 2011 Thomson Reuters. Click for Restrictions .

Read the full article →

Video: Keller Expects Japan Supply Issues to Hurt Automakers

March 18, 2011

March 18 (Bloomberg) — Maryann Keller, principal of a self-titled consulting firm, and Karl Bauer, senior analyst at Edmunds.com, talk about the impact of last week’s earthquake and tsunami on Japanese automobile parts manufacturers and the global auto industry. They speak with Matt Miller and Carol Massar on Bloomberg Television’s “Street Smart.” (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Video: Standard Chartered’s Mann Sees Further Yen Intervention

March 18, 2011

March 18 (Bloomberg) — Tim O’Sullivan, chief trader at FOREX.com, and David Mann, head of currency research at Standard Chartered Bank, talk about the outlook for the Japanese yen and the Group of Seven nations’ intervention in foreign-exchange markets. They speak with Carol Massar and Matt Miller on Bloomberg Television’s Taking Stock. (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Yen Intervention Resolves Immediate Crisis, But Japan’s Economy Still Threatened

March 18, 2011

The yen eased off its all-time high Friday as the world’s major central banks lent their support, but Japan’s economic troubles are far from over, experts say. Intervention by the Group of Seven industrial countries has curbed the recent spike in Japan’s currency, and it has, for the moment, shielded the nation against what could have been a devastating blow to trade, economists say. Still, fundamental challenges remain: last Friday’s 9.0-magnitude earthquake has crippled Japan’s economy through the coming months, economists say, as factories, roads and ports lie in ruins. Currency intervention did, however, prevent a bad situation from growing worse, according to analysts. “This is exactly what Japan needed,” said Nariman Behravesh, chief economist for the financial analysis firm IHS Global Insight. “If the yen had continued to rise, the contraction might have been even bigger.” The yen hit its highest value since World War II Thursday, raising fresh concerns about Japan’s economic prospects. Investors contributed to the yen’s rise by buying the currency, expecting an expensive rebuilding process in Japan, experts said. The likely thinking behind such trades was that Japanese institutions would convert foreign assets into yen to pay for damage claims and construction expenses, a process that would strengthen the currency. In anticipation, investors piled into yen, helping drive up its value. That development posed a serious threat to Japan’s economy . Already, with factories and infrastructure destroyed, trade disruptions had prompted economists to downgrade their forecasts for the nation’s output over the coming months. With the yen strengthening, prospects seemed even worse: The goods that Japan did manage to export would be more expensive and thus less attractive to foreign buyers. Toyota , for instance, estimated that each one-yen gain that Japan’s currency makes against the dollar tears about 30 billion yen from the company’s earnings, according to Bloomberg News. Amid concerns that these trade disruptions could affect economies worldwide, international powers took action. For the first time in over a decade, leaders from the G7 nations joined together to intervene in currency markets Friday, buying dollars and selling yen in an effort to tame the yen’s rise. Immediately, investors responded. Stock markets cut recent losses, and the yen fell from its high level, hitting its lowest value against the dollar since 2008. “It’s certainly what they needed to do. We were seeing a slow economic train wreck starting to develop, with the yen appreciating as it was,” said Scott Anderson, a senior economist at Wells Fargo. “The only economic engine Japan has right now — they’re like an airplane with its last engine running — is its exports.” But it’s unclear how lasting the relief will be, economists say. The last time such a coordinated effort took place was in 2000, when central banks attempted to stop the newly created euro from falling in value. The effects, back then, were temporary. The euro ticked upward after the intervention began in late September, but then fell through much of October. After a rise late in the year, it fell again in January 2001, beginning a sustained rise only in 2002. Such interventions can change investor sentiment, but they don’t necessarily have the ability to change fundamentals, said Mark McCormick, a currency strategist at the financial services firm Brown Brothers Harriman. Central banks don’t wield nearly as much money as the foreign exchange market, he noted. “They can’t overpower the market. They don’t have the ammunition to do so,” McCormick said. “But if they’re stealthy and they do it in an intelligent way, they can out-craft the market.” In this case, that may be what’s needed. The yen’s rise wasn’t being driven by fundamental changes, experts say. Rather, investors were anticipating developments that hadn’t yet occurred. In order for the effects of the central banks’ actions to last, investors will likely have to believe that any rise in the yen stemming from the reconstruction process will be offset by monetary stimulus. In essence, if the intervention is widely perceived to be working, then it will be working. But even if the central bank intervention succeeds, challenges for Japan’s economy will remain. Leading economists maintain a bleak outlook for Japan’s next several months. This week, Wells Fargo cut its forecast for Japan’s second quarter economic output, now predicting the economy will slip into recession until the second half of the year. That view still holds, Anderson said. Similarly, Friday’s currency intervention didn’t prompt Moody’s Analytics to change its anemic forecast. The prediction of 1 percent growth for 2011, down from the pre-earthquake forecast of 1.4 percent, still stands, according to Gus Faucher, director of macroeconomics for Moody’s Analytics. That outlook includes a recession that doesn’t let up until the second half of the year. The currency intervention, moreover, “may turn out to be a wash,” said Bernard Baumohl, chief economist of the Economic Outlook Group. “In the short run, the intervention has been a success, but a lot of Japanese companies are going to have to repatriate foreign investments,” Baumohl said. “There’s so much that’s unprecedented about this, it’s hard to figure out where, ultimately, the currency is going to go.”

Read the full article →

NY Fed Decides To Intervene In Currency Markets

March 18, 2011

WASHINGTON — The New York Federal Reserve Bank confirmed that it intervened in currency markets on Friday for the first time in more than a decade. The disclosure came a day after the Group of Seven major industrialized nations pledged in a statement to join in a coordinated effort to weaken the Japanese yen. The yen has surged in the last week to post-war record levels following the Japanese earthquake and tsunami. A spokesman at the New York Fed, which operates as the agent of the U.S. Treasury in currency operations, confirmed that it had intervened. The last time the U.S. government intervened in currency markets was the fall of 2000 when it sold dollars and bought euros to bolster the fledgling European currency. The spokesman refused to provide any details on the amounts of the intervention or what currencies were involved. A stronger yen threatened to deal another blow to the fragile Japanese economy by depressing the country’s exports. In morning trading in New York on Friday, a dollar was buying 81.30 yen, up from 79.05 yen late Thursday and moving off its postwar low of 76.32 yen hit on Wednesday. Before the earthquake struck, one dollar bought 83.02 yen.

Read the full article →

Video: De Longis Says Coordinated Yen Intervention Can Work

March 18, 2011

March 18 (Bloomberg) — Alessio de Longis, a portfolio manager at Oppenheimer Funds, discusses the Group of Seven’s decision to intervene in the foreign exchange market to help stabilize the Japanese economy in the wake of the March 11 earthquake. De Longis, speaking with Erik Schatzker on Bloomberg Television’s “InsideTrack,” also discusses his recommendation of the Swiss franc. (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Lack Of Parts From Japan Forces GM To Halt Production

March 17, 2011

DETROIT — A shortage of parts from Japan will force General Motors Co. to halt production at its pickup plant in Shreveport, La., next week, the company said Thursday. It’s the first time a U.S.-based automaker will stop production in North America over parts shortages caused by the earthquake and tsunami in Japan. Toyota Motor Co. and Subaru have already slowed North American production to conserve parts that they normally import from that nation. GM makes two compact pickups at its Shreveport plant, the GMC Canyon and Chevrolet Colorado. Both use a five-speed manual transmission made by Japanese supplier Aisin Seiki Co, which has halted production in Japan and suspended overtime in North America. GM’s other North American plants haven’t been affected so far. GM said it will resume production as soon as possible. Meanwhile, the company has enough of the trucks in inventory that it would take more than two months to sell them all. The trucks could be at the plant, en route to showrooms or on dealer lots. Ford Motor Co. and Chrysler Group LLC said their plants haven’t been affected by shortages.

Read the full article →

Video: Cookson Says Japan Stocks Are `Cheapest Since 1960s’

March 16, 2011

March 16 (Bloomberg) — Richard Cookson, global chief investment officer at Citigroup Inc.’s Private Bank in London, talks about the outlook for Japanese stocks. He speaks with Maryam Nemazee on Bloomberg Television’s “The Pulse.”

Read the full article →

Video: Japanese Flee Quake Zone as Government Battles Impact

March 16, 2011

March 16 (Bloomberg) — Hundreds of cars streamed south of Japanese areas devastated by last week’s earthquake and tsunami as a few dozen technicians battled to contain fires and radiation leaks at the Fukushima Dai-Ichi nuclear power station. Companies including Alcatel-Lucent SA and ICAP Plc said they are moving employees to safer locations. Bloomberg’s Sara Eisen reports. (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Video: Aftershocks Continue in Japan; Rain May Spread Radiation

March 16, 2011

March 16 (Bloomberg) — Bloomberg’s Margaret Conley in Tokyo reports the latest news on the crisis in Japan. A second fire in as many days broke out at a Japanese reactor hours after more earthquakes struck a country battling to avert a nuclear meltdown following last week’s record magnitude earthquake and tsunami. (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Dow Jones Tumbles, Japanese Yen Breaks 80 on Nuclear Risk

March 16, 2011

Dow Jones Tumbles, Japanese Yen Breaks 80 on Nuclear Risk

Read the full article →

Video: Hennessy Says Tech Companies to Be Hit Unevenly by Quake

March 15, 2011

March 15 (Bloomberg) — Stanford University President John Hennessy talks about the impact of the Japanese earthquake on companies that depend on manufacturing plants in Japan for parts for their products. Hennessy, a board member of Google Inc. and Cisco Systems Inc., also discusses his dinner with President Barack Obama and other leaders of the U.S. technology industry last month. He speaks with Emily Chang and Cory Johnson on Bloomberg Television’s “Bloomberg West.” (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Federal Reserve Plans To Hold Steady Despite Volatile International Climate

March 15, 2011

WASHINGTON (Reuters) – The Federal Reserve maintained its ultra-loose monetary policy on Tuesday, saying the economy was gaining traction while flagging potential inflation risks from costlier energy and food. The widely expected decision comes on a day of steep selling on stock markets around the world as investors assessed the devastating toll of Japan’s earthquake and tsunami, and fretted over the possibility of a broader nuclear crisis. The heightened uncertainty reinforced the case for a steady-as-she-goes policy decision from the Fed, which markedly upgraded its view of the U.S. recovery and labor market. In a unanimous decision, the Fed vowed to continue its $600 billion government bond-buying program as scheduled, and reiterated a pledge to keep interest rates at very low levels for an extended period. “The economic recovery is on a firmer footing, and overall conditions in the labor market appear to be improving gradually,” the central bank said in a statement. That was a much rosier assessment than it gave at the conclusion of its last meeting, in January, when it said that the recovery was still too weak to significantly bring down unemployment. The Fed dedicated an unusually large portion of its statement to inflation concerns surrounding a recent spike in energy and food prices, which it said would most likely prove transitory. “Long-term inflation expectations have remained stable, and measures of underlying inflation have been subdued,” the Fed said, suggesting that it was in no rush to raise interest rates. The statement made no direct mention of Japan. The worst earthquake on record for the world’s third- largest economy could have substantial ripple effects on the global recovery — as evidenced by a sharp pullback in global equity prices, with Japanese stocks down over 10 percent on Tuesday alone. Even before the tragedy, U.S. central bankers faced confusing signals. Despite high unemployment, rising energy costs appear to be nudging up the price expectations of U.S. consumers, the first inklings of an inflationary psychology the Fed would like avoid. Fed officials managed that tension by beefing up their assessment of economic conditions while emphasizing just how far the central bank remains from its targets for both inflation and employment. PROMISE AND PAIN Since the Fed’s last meeting in January, the U.S. economy has continued to show signs of promise. The U.S. unemployment rate has fallen rapidly, down to 8.9 percent in February from 9.8 percent in November. Still, the pace of hiring suggests further progress will be painfully slow for the 8-million-plus Americans who lost their jobs during the economic slump of 2007-2009. At the same time, higher gasoline costs have created fresh concerns for consumers, with a big hit to confidence this month raising concerns about whether a recent spurt in consumer spending can be sustained. The U.S. economy expanded at an annual rate of 2.8 percent in the fourth quarter, a respectable performance but a faster pace will likely be needed to make a further appreciable dent in unemployment. Some economists thought growth could approach 4 percent this quarter, but have pared back projections, in part because of an unexpected widening in the U.S. trade deficit. The Fed effectively chopped overnight interest rates down to zero in December 2008 and then turned to buying mortgage and Treasury debt to keep long-term borrowing costs low. In all, it has committed to buying $2.3 trillion in debt. The asset purchases have proven controversial, with domestic critics arguing the Fed is courting future inflation while officials in emerging markets have accused the central bank of trying to boost U.S. exports by devaluing the dollar. With the economy strengthening, officials are also likely to have had a vigorous debate on how best to eventually tighten policy, but analysts will have to wait until Fed speakers take to the podium again to get a fuller flavor of the discussions. Copyright 2011 Thomson Reuters. Click for Restrictions .

Read the full article →

Video: Kelley Sees Progress in Japan Nuclear Health Precautions: Video

March 14, 2011

March 14 (Bloomberg) — Robert Kelley, nuclear engineer and former contractor for the U.S. Department of Energy, discusses the damage and safety of Tokyo Electric Power Co.’s Fukushima Dai-Ichi nuclear plant. Kelley, speaking with Deirdre Bolton on Bloomberg Television’s “InsideTrack,” also talks about the outlook for nuclear energy following the March 11 Japanese earthquake and tsunami. (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Don McNay: Are You Working Towards Your Dream?

March 13, 2011

“And she never had dreams, so they never came true” -J. Giles Band As a structured settlement consultant, I go to meditations and settlement conferences with people who anticipate receiving large sums of money. I ask every person the same question. “Forget about what is going on today. If you won the lottery, what would you spend the money on?” The initial answers are usually vague, like “invest” or “put money in the bank.” Then, I tell them that when I become a billionaire, I am going to buy the Cincinnati Reds. When I tell them about my lifelong desire to own the Reds, they start talking about the things that interest them. From a planning standpoint, the lottery question is a great one. Everyone has dreams and desires but usually keep them hidden, back in the recesses of their minds. The lottery question gets those dreams and desires out in the open, on the front burner. Some of them have expensive aspirations (owning a NASCAR team comes up frequently). But, usually, they want things like sending their children to a nice college, buying a particular piece of property or helping their church. Once we start the conversation, the list gets longer and longer. My goal is to get people to think long-term. They need to clear their thinking of the rat race of every day life. The lottery question makes that happen. You don’t find many Americans who really think long-term. Many people go through life never developing real goals or good habits. We need a lottery question to help guide the people in Washington and Wall Street. Those of us on Main Street need it, too. Someone once said that American business people think quarter to quarter, Japanese business people think decade to decade and Chinese business people think century to century. We’ve watched short-term myopia destroy Wall Street. We need to take a lesson from our friends in the Far East. My father always said, “If you tell me who your friends are, I’ll tell you who you are.” You want to be hanging out with dreamers. And you want to be a dreamer yourself. A college friend introduced me to the J Giles song, “Angel in Blue,” and its sad lyric struck me even then. My friend was a person who never seemed to have any dreams or goals. I’ve always had bunches of them and I couldn’t understand a person who didn’t. I think everyone has some kind of dream or goal, but it gets buried by the overwhelming burdens of everyday life. Maybe that is why the lottery question is so effective. It takes people away the realities of their current situations and puts them in fantasy world, where they can start clean. If people take the time to ask themselves both the lottery question, it will allow them to focus on their goals and objectives. Once they get focused on their dreams, they may actually come true. Don McNay, CLU, ChFC, MSFS, CSSC of Richmond, Kentucky, is an award-winning columnist, structured settlement consultant and Huffington Post Contributor. He is the author of the book, Son of a Son of a Gambler: Winners, Losers and What to Do When You Win the Lottery. He has appeared on the CBS Evening News With Katie Couric along with numerous other television and radio programs. You can read more about Don at www.donmcnay.com . McNay has Master’s Degrees from Vanderbilt and the American College and is in the Hall of Distinguished Alumni of Eastern Kentucky University. McNay is a lifetime member of the Million Dollar Round Table and has four professional designations in the financial services field.

Read the full article →

Art Levine: Report: Explosion at nuclear plant in Japan (VIDEOS). Officials Fear: Meltdown at Reactor?

March 11, 2011

The AP reports: TOKYO, Japan — The walls of a building at nuclear power station crumbled Saturday as smoke poured out and Japanese officials said they feared the reactor could melt down following the failure of its cooling system in a powerful earthquake and tsunami. It was not clear if the damaged building housed the reactor. An official said the utility that runs the Fukushima Daiichi plant was reporting that several workers may have been injured. Fukushima Prefecture official Masato Abe said the cause of the rattling and smoke was unclear, declining to say whether an explosion had occurred. Footage on Japanese TV showed that the walls of one building had crumbled, leaving only a skeletal metal frame block standing. Puffs of smoke were spewing out of the plant. Pressure has been building up in the reactor — it’s now twice the normal level — and Japan’s Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency told reporters Saturday that it was venting “radioactive vapors” to relieve that pressure. Officials said they were measuring radiation levels in the area. The reactor in trouble has already leaked radiation: Operators at the Fukushima Daiichi plant’s Unit 1 detected eight times the normal radiation levels outside the facility and 1,000 times normal inside Unit 1′s control room. Japanese officials fear a meltdown,but it’s not known if the reactor has been breached. Here’s footage of the BBC airing the moment of explosion . Japanese TV first aired shots of smoke from the explosion: Follow breaking real-time news on nuclear crisis in Japan at www.topsy.com . UPDATE : BBC has a more alarming report: : Huge blast at Japan nuclear power plant A massive explosion has struck a Japanese nuclear power plant after Friday’s devastating earthquake. A huge pall of smoke was seen coming from the plant at Fukushima and several workers were injured. Japanese officials fear a meltdown at one of the plant’s reactors after radioactive material was detected outside it. A huge relief operation is under way after the 8.9-magnitude earthquake and tsunami, which killed more than 600. Hundreds more people are missing and it is feared about 1,300 may have died. The offshore earthquake triggered a tsunami which wreaked havoc on Japan’s north-east coast, sweeping far inland and devastating a number of towns and villages. Japan’s Prime Minister Naoto Kan declared a state of emergency at the Fukushima 1 and 2 power plants as engineers try to confirm whether a reactor at one of the stations has gone into meltdown . Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/world/2011/03/12/shaking-smoke-seen-japanese-nuclear-plant-facing-possible-meltdown/#ixzz1GNGlzvbv

Read the full article →

The Japanese Economy is Witnessing Growth Contraction

March 10, 2011

The Japanese Economy is Witnessing Growth Contraction

Read the full article →

Ian Fletcher: Currency Revaluation Won’t Fix America’s Trade Mess

March 4, 2011

It is sometimes suggested that our trade problems (job losses, international indebtedness) will go away on their own once currency values adjust. Bottom line? A declining dollar will eventually solve everything . In the short and medium term, of course, foreign currency manipulation will prevent currency values from adjusting. But even if we assume currencies will eventually adjust, there are still serious problems with just letting the dollar slide until our trade balances . For one thing, our trade might balance only after the dollar has declined so much that America’s per capita GDP is lower, at prevailing exchange rates, than Portugal’s. A 50 percent decline in the dollar from early-2011 levels would bring us to this level. And how big a decline would be needed to balance our trade nobody really knows, especially as we cannot predict how aggressively our trading partners will try to employ subsidies, tariffs, and nontariff barriers to protect their trade surpluses. Dollar decline will write down the value of wealth that Americans have toiled for decades to acquire. Ordinary Americans may not care about the internationally denominated value of their money per se, but they will experience dollar decline as a wave of inflation in the price of imported goods. Everything from blue jeans to home heating oil will go up, with a ripple effect on the prices of domestically produced goods. A declining dollar may even worsen our trade deficit in the short run, as it will increase the dollar price of many articles we no longer have any choice but to import, foreign competition having wiped out all domestic suppliers of items as prosaic as fabric suitcases and as sophisticated as the epoxy cresol novolac resins used in computer chips. (Of the billion or so cellular phones made worldwide in 2008, not one was made in the U.S.) Ominously, the specialized skills base in the U.S. has been so depleted in some industries that even when corporations do want to move production back, they cannot do so at feasible cost. Another problem with relying on dollar decline to square our books is that this won’t just make American exports more attractive. It will also make foreign purchases of American assets–everything from Miami apartments to corporate takeovers–more attractive, too. As a result, it may just stimulate asset purchases if not combined with policies designed to promote the export of actual goods. A spate of corporate acquisitions by Japanese companies was, in fact, one of the major unintended consequences of a previous currency-rebalancing effort: the 1985 Plaza Accord to increase the value of the Japanese Yen, which carries important lessons for today. Combined with some stimulation of Japan’s then-recessionary economy, it was supposed to produce a surge in Japanese demand for American exports and rectify our deficit with Japan, then the crux of our trade problems. For a few years, it appeared to work: the dollar fell by half against the yen by 1988 and after a lag, our deficit with Japan fell by roughly half, too, bottoming out in the recession year of 1991. This was enough for political agitation against Japan to go off the boil, and Congress and the public seemed to lose interest in the Japanese threat. But only a few years later, things returned to business as usual, and Japan’s trade surpluses reattained their former size. Japan’s surplus against the U.S. in 1985 was $46.2 billion, but by 1993 it had reached $59.4 billion. (It was $74.1 billion in 2008 before dipping with recession.) Relying on currency revaluation to rebalance our trade also assumes that the economies of foreign nations are not rigged to reject our exports regardless of their price in local currency. Many nations play this game to some extent: the most sophisticated player is probably still Japan, about which the distinguished former trade diplomat Clyde Prestowitz has written: If the administration listed the structural barriers of Japan–such as keiretsu [conglomerates], tied distribution, relationship-based business dealings, and industrial policy–it had described in its earlier report, it would, in effect, be taking on the essence of Japanese economic organization. We cannot expect foreign nations to redesign their entire economies just to pull in more imports from the U.S. In any case, the killer argument against balancing our trade by just letting the dollar fall comes down to a single word: oil. If the dollar has to fall by half to do this, this means that the price of oil must double in dollar terms. Even if oil remains denominated in dollars (it is already de facto partly priced in euros) a declining dollar will drive its price up. The U.S., with its entrenched suburban land use patterns and two generations of underinvestment in mass transit, is exceptionally ill-equipped to adapt, compared to our competitors. Fundamentally, allowing the dollar to crumble is a way of restoring our trade balance and international competitiveness by becoming poorer. That’s not what Americans want, or should want. A tariff is a much better solution.

Read the full article →

Mazda Recall Caused By Wandering Spiders

March 3, 2011

WASHINGTON — Mazda has some creepy crawly culprits in its new safety recall – spiders. After discovering spider webs in the vents, the Japanese automaker is recalling more than 50,000 Mazda6 cars from the 2009-2010 model years in the United States and an additional 15,000 vehicles in Canada, Mexico and Puerto Rico. The company said Thursday a spider could weave a web in a vent connected to the fuel tank system and clog up the tank’s ventilation. Pressure on the fuel tank could lead to a crack, causing fuel leakage and the risk of a fire. Mazda said it was unaware of any fires, injuries or crashes in the vehicles. Mazda spokesman Jeremy Barnes said dealers had identified 20 cases in which spider webs were found in the vents. The webs were linked to yellow sac spiders, Barnes said, but it was unclear why they were crawling into the Mazda6 rather than other vehicles. Adding to the mystery, Barnes said the arachnoid attraction to the sporty cars – which the company has marketed with its “zoom-zoom” tagline – had no specific connection to a particular region of North America. “Perhaps yellow sac spiders like to go zoom-zoom?” Barnes quipped. The recall involves vehicles with V4 engines built from April 2008 to February 2010. Owners will be notified by mid-March and told to take their vehicles to dealers for inspection and repairs. Dealers will inspect and clean up the vent line and install a spring to prevent a spider from entering the vent line. Customers can call Mazda at (800) 222-5500.

Read the full article →

Beth Arnold: Letter From Paris: Designing Women

February 28, 2011

“Style is knowing who you are, what you want to say, and not giving a damn.” — Gore Vidal WORDS TO LIVE by–and even more important when one lives in a foreign land. Think of Sofia Coppola’s Lost in Translation . Sooner or later every expatriate feels lost–and must rediscover who she is and express herself in a meaningful way. The women I’m about to present uncovered their entrepreneurial spirits and became designers. They transformed their self-identities–their individual styles–into products that organically fit them as well as their new lives abroad. I’d like to point out that what these designing women did not do was put products on the market just to make a buck, which seems to be the name of the game throughout what has become our throwaway culture. The high road of honesty, beauty, and principles–on every level–which also transcends into true style has been replaced with a mass superhighway of products that manipulate and push people’s buttons. A cheap thrill. Never forget: There is nothing more attractive–nothing more stylish or deeply, spiritually important–than authenticity. I was knocked out by each one of these women for reasons you’ll soon understand. Meet designers … 1) Kasia Dietz Kasia Dietz designs a line of one-of-a-kind, reversible handbags, totes, and clutches that are “made in Paris with love.” Ms. Dietz first began designing the bags a few years ago while she was still working full-time in an advertising career in New York. Mixing her passion for art, design and fashion, she came upon the idea of taking raw canvas and printing it–creating ‘wearable art’–with an added element of reversibility. “I …designed the ‘minimalism’ and ‘nature’ collections,” said Ms. Dietz, “and set up a website with the help of a friend. From there things took off!” Among others, the Japanese loved them, and she did quite well with sales. “During this process,” says Ms. Dietz, “I uncovered my mom’s prints that were collecting dust since the late 1970′s and incorporated them into my designs.” When her mother, Barbara Dietz (originally from Poland), was expecting her, she began to carve wooden blocks with designs of flowers, animals, zodiac signs, and more–and then print T-shirts with them (as well as bedsheets, flared pants, etc.). With the help of Barbara Dietz’s P.R. and marketing skilled husband (and Kasia’s father), the hand-made prints were a big hit with clients like Bloomingdale’s and Bergdorf Goodman. I love the roundness–and familial comfort–in this story, since Ms. Dietz has brought her mother’s art back to life–and uses her family name in memory of her father who passed away almost 20 years ago. Then, in 2007, the tall and slim creator took a break from normal life and traveled the world, always keeping a mindful eye on design, fabrics, colors, and art. “When I moved to Paris in August, 2009, I had the desire (and finally the time) to continue designing, considering I had collected 13 months of inspiration from my travels and was living in what can certainly be considered a fashion capital. But getting started was very tough, not to mention intimidating with my lack of contacts and poor language skills. I spent many afternoons carousing the garment districts of the Sentier and Montmartre looking for fabrics and a manufacturer.” She relaunched her site on December 1st, and sales are steadily growing. “My plans are to continue designing timeless reversible bags and totes, clutches, purses, etc. in fabrics that inspire me as well as printing my own canvas bags as in the latest ‘Paris’ collection. Perhaps a NYC and London collection and more designs incorporating travel.” Me, I’m a bag lady and could have a different one for every occasion. If I had to choose? I’m eyeing the Right Bank bag, since I’m a Right Bank girl. I could also be tempted with one of the number of my arrondissement. Naturally, Ms. Dietz’s love of travel and design are apparent in her bags, which can take a girl anywhere, whether she’s out on the town or planning a weekend away. For Kasia Dietz’s collection, go to www.kasiadietz.com . Select bags will be sold in NYC at Gramercy Project, 240 3rd Avenue, NY 10013. (Montage via Kasia Dietz. Other photos by Beth Arnold.) 2) Michelle Guiliano Necessity is the mother of invention is a phrase that could have been coined for Michelle Guiliano who designs functional gear and technical clothing for babies, so parents–like herself and her husband–who thrive on outdoor activities will feel confident in taking their little ones on outside adventures with them. In fact, Ms. Guiliano’s designs are so on target that her company BolderKidsTM Ltd. was named a Finalist in the 2011 ISPO (International Sports Business Network) BrandNew Awards that were held in Munich last month. Ms. Guiliano and her Danish husband, Jesper Westfall (pictured below), moved to Zurich 10 years ago, and their two boys were born there before they bought a house across the Swiss-French border in Divonne-les-Bains, France. She is an amateur endurance athlete, triathlete, and former rowing coach for Columbia University who became fed up with the inferior outdoor clothing products available to her kids when they were under the age of four. “It was a bit too reminiscent of being an athlete 20 years ago and having to buy a men’s small for any performance fabrics,” said Ms. Guiliano, “which, then, alas didn’t perform for women because without the right fit all is lost. Here we are again with an underserved niche market segment–babies and their outdoor loving parents. Well, I got motivated to build something great to get everyone outdoors with greater safety, comfort, and style.” She founded BolderKids in March, 2009. Hand-sketching the first designs for the Go Farther Performance Infant Carrier Collection, Ms. Guiliano used paper and plastic bags to make the first prototypes. She united the most practical elements of timeless Scandinavian design with Schoeller bluesign approved ecological performance soft shell fabric (made in Switzerland) to create her mittens, boots, and infant carrier. These handy products may have been too late for her own sons, but families with babies and young children can benefit now. Ms. Guiliano was heartened to see the international community recognize that even the youngest outdoor explorers need clever design and quality innovation. And you’ve got to love her brand’s cool slogan: Play Hard. Go Far.© What a great baby present for lovers of the outdoors! By the way, this is a tri-lingual family. Welcome to the new global world! Check out her video that demonstrates the infant carrier system: ISPO BrandNew Awards . For more on BolderKids, go to www.bolderkids.com . Ms. Guiliano’s mountain climbing sons, Peter and Andrew (BolderKids photos via BolderKids) And last though certainly not least… 3) Kirsten Hovenier and Mikée Westerling Crossing the border into Switzerland, one finds a much different style than exists in France. Kirsten Hovenier and Mikée Westerling can tell you all about the Swiss and their clean and fresh design, their wonderful materials and solid craftsmanship. These designing women are using original, up to almost one hundred-year-old Swiss army blankets to create handmade and cozy pillows in different sizes, sturdy footstools, agenda covers, firewood holders, duffle bags, napkin rings, totes, and more to stunning effect. Ms. Hevenier and Ms. Westerling, both from the Netherlands originally, have lived in several countries but moved to Switzerland with their families in August, 2007. They discovered the handsome army blankets, developed a great love for them, and began using them in their own homes. They turned the blankets into cushion covers for the sofa, took the blankets with them for long Swiss summer evenings, and used them for picnics on the banks of Lake Geneva. Everywhere they went, people loved them. Ms. Westerling and Ms. Hevenier have a great story to tell: “In the late 19th century until the early sixties, the Swiss army produced the covers for a war which, fortunately, never happened. The blankets were stored in caves in the Swiss Alps, which served as military depots. The traditional production ceased in the sixties and blankets remained in stock: brand new and unused, but at the same time, pure vintage, a rare combination! And DEKEN discovered this hidden treasure.” I am thinking what lucky girls they were, but it took more than luck to start their company. Ms. Westerling had worked as an interior designer while Ms. Hevenier had been a management consultant. But once their idea for using the Swiss blankets to create casually chic, handsome products for the home was hatched, the whole plan was laid out within two days. Thus DEKEN–Dutch for blanket–was born. These Swiss army blankets are beautifully distinctive: gray-brown with the typical red and white cross and sometimes even a stainless steel coin or seal. Because of reliable Swiss quality, the blankets are indestructible–and marked with the initials of the maker and the year in which the blanket was made. Each blanket is different. I can tell you I’m lusting for some of that gorgeous Deken myself! To see more of the Deken collection, check out www.deken.ch or www.swissarmyblanket.com . Deken is also sold in Camps and Cottages in California. (Photos via DEKEN) In cooperation with KarlenSwiss, Ms. Hevenier and Ms. Westerling have expanded the DEKEN collection with bags, cushions, and footstools made of the Swiss, Antilles and Dutch mailbag. The KarlenSwiss collection will be in stores in the US. * Where there’s a will, there’s a way. And these designing women have found theirs with their own impeccable style. Beth Arnold lives and writes in Paris. To see more of her work, go to www.betharnold.com. She believes in creativity. Crack your world open with it.

Read the full article →

Forex Strategy Outlook: Volatility Favors Breakout Trading in Japanese Yen

February 28, 2011

Forex Strategy Outlook: Volatility Favors Breakout Trading in Japanese Yen

Read the full article →

Fluctuations controlled Asian financial markets and Japanese data dominated the week

February 26, 2011

Fluctuations controlled Asian financial markets and Japanese data dominated the week

Read the full article →

Important data awaits the Japanese economy

February 19, 2011

Important data awaits the Japanese economy

Read the full article →

Nake M. Kamrany: China’s Rapid Recovery in the Great Recession of 2007 – 2009

February 18, 2011

During the recession of 2007-2009 China’s exports dropped 15-18 percent causing 23 million workers to be laid off, but 98% readily found jobs as the economy bounced back and the unemployment rate dropped to 4% with a $586 billion stimulus package. The strategy was to create employment directly through fiscal means as President Roosevelt did during the Great Depression of the 1930s. In the great recession of 2007-2009, President Bush and Obama’s monetary stimulus have not reduced U.S. unemployment rate below 9% as of this date.. China is indeed back on track having 11.9 percent growth of GDP for the first quarter of 2010. It is now U.S.’s second largest trading partner, largest holder of U.S. public debt, is the number one producer of solar energy, second to the U.S. in energy consumption, is the biggest producer of greenhouse gasses, and the number one market for U.S. autos. China has a trade surplus with the U.S. in the amount of $238 billion. It intentionally keeps the value of its currency renminbi (yuan) low against the dollar to promote its favorable trade surplus. China has a de-facto G-2 partnership with the U.S. power sharing deal, The U.S. and China have common and divergent interests as China is becoming a global power house. China is holding $1.295 trillion of U.S. securities, an increase of 6.4 fold since 2002. China’s per capita income is $6,546 as compared to $40,208 for the U.S. The GDP is $9 trillion as compared to $14 trillion for the U.S.. If China’s economic performance continues at the same rate as in the last 30 years, its per capita income will converge with that of the U.S. by the year 2040 assuming it remains politically stable. China’s reform started in the 1980s just about in the same time as President Richard Nixon’s visit to China which opened the way for China’s incursion into international trade and economic growth. Since then, more than 250 million Chinese have been lifted out of poverty — a remarkable achievement. China’s system cannot be emulated by other nations because of its unique institutional framework, nor is it intending to export its system. Some of its leaders fear that adopting Western democracy may cause turbulence in society. Its main objective in dealing with foreign countries is economic opportunity, trade and development in a pragmatic way. Political leadership of a one-party system is elected every five years. China has a market authoritarian form of a system in which a free market is allowed to operate with the government holding a very firm hand on political activity in the country. Last year 10,000 small protests were tolerated. Currently over half of China’s GDP is produced by privately controlled enterprises. Currently China’s unemployment is at 4% by adopting a policy of employing labor into the factories in contrast to engaging private loans through micro-financing schemes as is prevalent in India and Latin America or through short term manipulation of the supply of money as being practiced in the U.S. Further, it is most notable that China escaped three global financial meltdowns since 1990 including the Japanese severe credit implosion, the developing Asian economies who suffered foreign reserve meltdown caused by money flight due to fixed exchange rate regimes and the 2007-2011 great recession that engulfed most of the world’s economy except China. The 2007-2011 great recessions were contagious and China’s strong globalization orientation was expected to push the Chinese economy into the transmittable and turbulent global meltdown, but ironically China escaped. Thus the Chinese rapid economic performance draws attention to the Western neoclassical synthesis concerning management of macroeconomic stability, macro/monetary policy and efficacy of countercyclical measures in the short run and in the long run. What is it that distinguishes China’s approach in contrast to the rest of the world? Essentially the Chinese performance suggests a reexamination of the received doctrine of mainstream macroeconomic paradigms in the West as the costs of the economic meltdown of 2007-2009 and on previous occasions point to the limitations of the existing remedies of macroeconomic and financial framework. Nake M. Kamrany is professor of economics and director of program in law and economics at the University of Southern California. This article is a synopsis of a chapter in the forthcoming book, “China After the Global Financial Crisis,” to be published by International Research Institute in November, 2011.

Read the full article →

British Pound To Consolidate Following Sharp Rebound, Japanese Yen Could Face Range Bound Price Action

February 10, 2011

British Pound To Consolidate Following Sharp Rebound, Japanese Yen Could Face Range Bound Price Action

Read the full article →

The US Dollar and Japanese Yen continue to decline for a third day in a row

February 9, 2011

The US Dollar and Japanese Yen continue to decline for a third day in a row

Read the full article →

In China, A New Studio System

February 3, 2011

In 2006 the young and not-yet-renowned director Lu Chuan took his idea for an ambitious epic about the Japanese massacre at Nanjing, already rejected by a major Chinese studio, to a young, unknown film producer who, as one of the producer’s own friends chided him, “didn’t know anything about movies.” Qin Hong, then 35, had taken the helm of Stellar Megamedia Group, a moneylosing company whose listed Hong Kong arm was on the verge of liquidation, selling off assets to stay afloat.

Read the full article →

10 Industries In Which The U.S. Is No Longer No.1

January 31, 2011

Americans are used to being No.1 in nearly all the world’s businesses, and athletic endeavors. The foundation of that certainly began to erode in the 1970′s, when much of America’s manufacturing industry started to move overseas.  Many U.S. companies wanted to cut costs, including high-priced manufacturing jobs. That contributed to the rise of the Japanese and, more recently, the Chinese economies. As U.S. manufacturing eroded,  so did other critical parts of society. American children are no longer the best educated in the world. America’s health care system no longer produces the healthiest population. US GDP no longer grows as quickly as it once did, particularly in the recoveries that follow recessions. China now has the fastest growing large economy in the world. It has passed Japan into the No.2 spot and economists are forecasting how long it will take to pass the US.

Read the full article →

British Pound Carves Near-Term Top, Japanese Yen To Hold Range

January 27, 2011

British Pound Carves Near-Term Top, Japanese Yen To Hold Range

Read the full article →

Euro Rally To Taper Off, Japanese Yen Maintains Range

January 27, 2011

Euro Rally To Taper Off, Japanese Yen Maintains Range

Read the full article →

The Japanese central bank raises growth forecasts through 2010 and starts the New Year with optimism

January 25, 2011

The Japanese central bank raises growth forecasts through 2010 and starts the New Year with optimism

Read the full article →

Forex Correlations Show Japanese Yen Closely Linked to US Treasury Yields

January 25, 2011

Forex Correlations Show Japanese Yen Closely Linked to US Treasury Yields

Read the full article →

Key Japanese Companies To Exhibit The Biggest Construction Equipment Expo in Australia

January 20, 2011

Key Japanese Companies To Exhibit The Biggest Construction Equipment Expo in Australia

Read the full article →

Higher produce price index in Japan push Japanese companies to protect profits

January 14, 2011

Higher produce price index in Japan push Japanese companies to protect profits

Read the full article →

Euro May Find Bid on Successful Bond Auctions with Japanese Support

January 11, 2011

Euro May Find Bid on Successful Bond Auctions with Japanese Support

Read the full article →

Euro advances after Japanese pledge to buy European debt

January 11, 2011

Euro advances after Japanese pledge to buy European debt

Read the full article →