knowledge

Rich Nadworny: The Creativity Conundrum

September 16, 2010

For most of us who work in marketing, we consider ourselves to work in a “creative” industry. That is: we’re charged with coming up with creative solutions to marketing problems and, usually, the ones with the best creative ideas win. If you work in an agency, you’ve probably heard, ad naseum (Latin for: until it makes you sick) that creative is king. The bigger question for me is: where does this creativity come from? Or maybe a better question is: how do you foster a creative environment? A number of recent articles make some interesting points and seriously call into question the practices of so-called “creative workplaces.” The first article by Timothy Williamson of Oxford University, talks about imagination. He posits that rather than fictional flights of fancy, early humans developed imaginative skills built on real experiences. It was the evaluation of alternative “realities” that gave imagination its evolutionary power. Imagining different ways a saber-toothed tiger might eat you increased your chances of survival. Imagination is the critical ingredient for creativity. But you have to have lots of real-life experience to have a really good one. In a similar vein, Jonah Lehrer, author of How We Decide penned an article that shot down one of Malcolm Gladwell’s a-ha points of outliers. He jumped on the idea that practicing something singularly for 10,000 hours will increase your chances of becoming a superstar. Instead, a recent study of professional athletes showed that those who group up in small towns and played a variety of sports growing up were most likely to become professionals. It flew in the face of the Tiger Woods theory that focusing on one sport, intensely, was the best path to stardom. Variety of experience, and lack of success in many of those experiences, actually makes us perform better. The same is true of study habits. In our schools today we think that immersing ourselves in specific topics and studying them intensely will increase our knowledge and test scores. Actually, studies show the exact opposite to be true. Varying the types of materials studied, or even varying the content studied, yielded better results. Here’s the money quote from Nate Kornell, a psychologist at Williams College, “The finding undermines the common assumption that intensive immersion is the best way to really master a particular genre, or type of creative work.” Finally, once you have all of these experiences and have gathered knowledge in different ways, what do you need most? Time off, actually. In studies about our “always on society,” research shows that what our brains need most is time to process all of the different inputs we receive during the day. Always on is stimulating, but it doesn’t make us smarter. Here’s why from Loren Fran, an assistant professor of physiology at UCSF who specializes in learning and memory: “Almost certainly, downtime lets the brain go over experiences it’s had, solidify them and turn them into permanent long-term memories.” He said he believes that when the brain was constantly stimulated, “you prevent this learning process.” So you’d think that business that specialize in creativity would: Encourage people to experience many different things Allow people to work on a variety of projects and clients to increase their reality-based experiences Provide an array of research and creative materials, across disciplines, to make people smarter Make sure people don’t do the same thing all the time, every day Ensure that people have enough down time, either at work or at home, to process everything In short, companies would be in the business of developing more renaissance, or hybrid, people ( See more here, in an older blog post ). It’s those people who should have the greatest chance of creative thinking and doing, which in turn should drive business results. Right? Unfortunately, today’s creative workplaces are nothing like this. People toil long hours focusing on the same types of work and projects day in and day out. Companies talk the talk about interdisciplinary thinking and collaboration but they walk the walk of siloization and isolation. And time? We’re expected to work longer, and more intensely, with every passing year. It would be one thing if creative companies provided down time, or thinking time, at work, for everyone, another if they provided sabbaticals or longer vacations to do the same. But if they’re doing that, I haven’t heard much about them. To paraphrase Shakespeare: Some are born creative, some achieve creativity, and some have creativity thrust upon them. As creative business people, we should help our people achieve creativity. But we won’t succeed unless we radically alter the way we’ve built up our business and employee practices.

Read the full article →

Marty Zwilling: Nine Principles of Leadership for Entrepreneurs

September 9, 2010

Creating and building a business is not a one-man show. It requires a team effort, or at least the ability to build trust and confidence among key players, and effectively communicate with partners, team members, investors, vendors, and customers. These actions are the hallmark of an effective leader. Behind the actions are a set of principles and characteristics that entrepreneurial leaders, like Bill Gates and Steve Jobs, seem to have in common. Look for these and nurture them in your own context to improve the odds of success for your own startup: 1. Clarity of vision and expectations. You must be able and willing to communicate to everyone your vision, goals, and objectives. Just as importantly, you have to be absolutely clear about who you are, what you stand for, and what you expect from everyone around you. People won’t follow you if they are in the dark or confused. 2. Willingness to make decisions. It is often said that making any decision is better than making no decision. Even better than “any decision” is a good decision made quickly. Business decisions always involve risk, at times a great deal of it. Smart entrepreneurs always balance the risk with facts, when they have them, rather than their gut. 3. Experience and knowledge in your business area. Effective leaders set a personal standard of competence for every person and function in the startup. It must be clear that you have the knowledge, insight, and skill to make your new company better than your very best competitor. 4. Commitment and conviction for the venture. This commitment must be passionate enough to motivate and inspire people to do their best work, and put their heart into the effort. Behind the passion must be a business model that makes sense in today’s world, and a determination to keep going despite setbacks. 5. Open to new ideas and creativity . In business, this means spending time and resources on new ideas, as well as encouraging people to find faster, better, cheaper, and easier ways to produce results, beat competition, and improve customer service. Be a role model and guide others to excel. 6. Courage to acknowledge and attack constraints. An effective leader is willing and able to allocate resources to remove obstacles to the success of the startup, as well as removing constraints on individuals on the team. It is believing that where there is the will, there will be a way. 7. Reward continuous learning. You have to encourage everyone to learn and grow as a normal and natural part of business. That means no punishment for failures, and positive opportunities for training and advancement. Personally, it means upgrading your own skills, listening, and reading about new developments and approaches. 8. Self-discipline for consistency and reliability. An effective leader is totally predictable, calm, positive, and confident, even under pressure. People like to follow someone when they don’t have to “walk on eggshells” to avoid angry outbursts, or assume daily changes in direction. 9. Accept responsibility for all actions. Everyone and every company makes mistakes. Good entrepreneurs don’t want to be seen as perfect, and they have to be seen as willing to accept the fact that “the buck stops here.” No excuses, or putting the blame on the economy, competitors, or team members. The good news is that all of these principles of leadership are learnable. The bad news is that it’s not easy. Don’t assume that success as an entrepreneur is only about great presentations, killing competitors, or having insanely great ideas. It’s really more about leadership, understanding the needs of your prospective clients, and communicating your solutions with clarity.

Read the full article →

Bill Singer: Fired Analyst Loses Multi-Million Dollar Arbitration Against Former Employer

September 8, 2010

Rodman & Renshaw and other Claimants filed a FINRA Arbitration Statement of Claim (initially in October 2006 and thereafter as amended) against Respondent Matthew N. Murray. Among other claims, Claimants alleged defamation, tortious interference with business relations, breach of fiduciary duty, conversion, breach of contract, and prima facie tort, trademark infringement, and cybersquatting. In the Matter of the Arbitration Between Rodman & Renshaw, LLC, John Borer, Edward Rubin, Michael Vasinkevich, and Wesley K. Clark, Claimants , vs. Matthew N. Murray, Respondent (FINRA Arbitration 06-04643, August 26, 2010). The relief and damages sought by Claimants in the original Statement of Claim included: compensatory damages in an amount to be determined at trial, but at least $10,000,000.00; the recovery of Claimant’s costs and expenses of this proceeding, including reasonable attorneys’ fees; punitive damages in the sound discretion of the arbitrators but at least $15,000,000.00; an order enjoining Respondent from continuing to disseminate defamatory materials and information concerning Claimant and its principals and Chairman of its holding company; an order requiring that Respondent return to Claimant all documents and other assets belonging to Claimant, including Claimant’s proprietary and confidential contact list, and enjoining Murray from using any of those assets or materials; and granting such other and further relief as the arbitrators deem appropriate. In two additional Amended Statements of Claim, Claimants further sought an order pemnanently enjoying Respondent from: using the Rodman trademark and trade name, and any variations of the Rodman trademark and trade name, or any other mark confusingly similar to such trademark and trade name, or any other mark or variation of a mark belonging to Rodman or the Internet or in any other medium; creating or maintaining any website or the Internet using any of Rodman’s trademark and trade name; using any Claimant’s name or any variation of any Claimant’s name in a domain name in any manner likely to cause confusion by the public, including, without limitation, the following domain names: — generalclarkandrodman.com, — johnborer.com, — edwardrubin.com, — michaelvasinkevich.com, and — jayauslander.com; and using any Claimant’s name in any manner likely to induce the belief that any of the Respondent Websites is endorsed by any Claimant. Respondent Murray generally denied the allegations and asserted various affirmative defenses. Respondent Counterclaims In his Counterclaim, Respondent Murray asserted breach of contract and defamation and sought the following relief and damages: compensatory damages in an amount to be determined at trial, but at least $2,000,000.00; the recovery of Respondent’s costs and expenses of this proceeding, including reasonable attorneys’ fees; punitive damages in the sound discretion of the arbitrators but at least $2,000,000.00; expungement of all defematory statements from his Form U5; a declaration that all Claimants (except General Clark) improperly retaliated against him from attempting to exercise his independence as a research analyst by removing him from the research department and then terminating his employment; a declaration that all Claimants (except General Clark) defamed him by causing a defamatory statement to be published on his Form U5; a declaration that all Claimants defamed him by publishing statements that he had been fired for sound business reasons; a declaration that Rodman violated NASD Rule 2711 by firing him and removing him from the research department in retaliation for attempting to exercise his independence as a research analyst; a declaration that Rodman violated SEC Regulation AC when it refused to remove his name from a research report after he stated that he no longer believed that the contents of the report were true; a declaration that General Clark breached his fiduciary duties as Rodman’s Chairman by refusing to conduct an independent investigation into his allegations of improper retaliation against him and by covering up the misconduct that has occurred; a declaration that, by filing the District Court action and obtaining preliminary injunction against him, Claimants have waived their rights to arbitrate both the claims they asserted in this arbitration and his counterclaims in this arbitration; and granting such other and further relief as the arbitrators deem appropriate. Arbitration Panel Ruling The FINRA Arbitrators found Respondent Murray liable for and ordered him to pay to Rodman & Renshaw, LLC, compensatory damages in the amount of $10,700,000.00 plus interest at 9% per annum from August 9, 2006 until August 12, 2010. Respondent’s Counterclaim request for expungement were denied. Bill Singer’s Comment : According to press accounts, in 2005, Murray had recommended Halozyme Therapeutics, a biopharmaceutical company, when its shares were trading at $1.86, with a $2.88 price target. Rodman & Renshaw was part of a banking group that raised $17.5 million for the company in a public stock offering. After the publication of Murray’s buy recommendation, Halozyme rose over to over $3. Subsequent to Halozyme reaching his price target, Murray attempted to downgrade his recommendation. Thereafter, Rodman & Renshaw’s Director of Research sent an email to Murray that included a suggestion that the analyst “finesse his target price.” Although Rodman & Renshaw agreed in subsequent legal filings that the finesse suggestion was an awkward request, the firm characterized the language as little more than an attempt to improve the precision of the rating. Murray disputed that explanation and cited to more heavy-handed actions by the firm, which he claimed were intended to supress his independece. Murray noted that after Rodman & Renshaw denied his request for the downgrade, that on two occasions the firm refused his request to have his name removed from coverage of Halozyme. In February 2006, John J. Borer, III, President of Rodman & Renshaw Holding, LLC announced the appointment of General Wesley K. Clark (ret.) as Chairman of the Board and Head of the Advisory Board. Clark was a thirty-four year United States Army veteran, who rose to the rank of 4-star general and NATO Supreme Allied Commander. He was also a candidate for President of the United States in 2003. Rodman & Renshaw’s 2009 10-Q (May) states in part under Item 1. Legal Proceedings (see, at http://www.wikinvest.com/stock/Rodman_&_Renshaw_Capital_(RODM)/Legal_Proceedings ) [A]s a result of allegations by Mr. Murray that we terminated him in violation of NASD Rule 2711 (“Rule 2711″) and SEC Regulation AC (“Reg AC”) in retaliation for his desire to downgrade an issuer that he provided research coverage on, the Committee on Finance of the U.S. Senate (“SFC”) and the SEC commenced inquiries, the AG issued a subpoena and FINRA initiated an investigation. The SFC, by letter dated May 25, 2006 from its former chairman, Senator Charles E. Grassley (“Grassley”), requested that our Chairman make himself available for an interview with Grassley’s staff and respond to certain questions in connection with Murray’s termination. By letter of the same date, Grassley, along with Senator Max Baucus, who was at that time the ranking member of the SFC, wrote to Christopher Cox, then chairman of the SEC, asking the SEC to conduct a “comprehensive and thorough examination” into our termination of Murray. Both the letter to us and the letter to Cox reference possible violations of Rule 2711 and Reg AC. We responded to the letter from Grassley and our Chairman voluntarily appeared for an interview by Grassley’s staff in July 2006. The last written correspondence from Grassley’s offices to us with respect to this matter occurred in September 2006. Neither former chairman Grassley nor the SFC has contacted us since that date, and the SFC has not, to our knowledge, issued any subpoena in connection with its inquiry. By letter dated March 27, 2006, the SEC advised us that it was undertaking an inquiry of us and it requested that we produce documents in connection with that inquiry. Although the letter from the SEC does not specifically reference either Rule 2711 or Reg AC, the documents they requested and our counsel’s conversation with the SEC staff indicated that the focus of the inquiry was Murray’s allegations. We responded to the SECinquiry and produced responsive documents to the SEC. In addition, we produced our chief compliance officer for an interview at the SEC. By letter dated April 18, 2007, the SEC advised us that its inquiry had been terminated and that no enforcement action had been recommended. On or about July 7, 2006, the AG served us with a subpoena containing a number of requests for information and documents concerning, among other things, the termination of Murray. The subpoena does not specifically reference either Rule 2711 or Reg AC. We produced documents and information responsive to the subpoena (including all of the documents that we also had previously provided to the SEC). To our knowledge, the AG has not interviewed any of our employees and we have not received any communication from the AG since the end of August 2006. By letter dated April 10, 2006, FINRA advised us that it was reviewing matters related to the circumstances surrounding the termination of the former employee and requested that we produce documents in connection with that review. By letter dated April 11, 2006, FINRA withdrew its request, to avoid regulatory duplication, upon learning that the SEC was also reviewing the same events. However, in 2007 we received certain letters from FINRA requesting certain information, documentation and interviews. We produced all information and documentation requested, complied with the request for interviews and continue to cooperate fully with FINRA’s investigation. We have not received any further communication from FINRA since December 2007.

Read the full article →

Mark Hurd’s Salary At Oracle Said To Be $950,000

September 8, 2010

NEW YORK — Oracle plans to pay newly appointed President Mark Hurd a base salary of $950,000 a year. The company also says the former Hewlett-Packard Co. CEO, who was ousted by that company last month, is eligible for a fiscal 2011 bonus of as much as $10 million. Oracle released the details of Hurd’s pay package in a filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission on Wednesday. The biggest part of Hurd’s pay package will be the 10 million stock options Oracle plans to give him. The company said Hurd’s options will carry an exercise price equal to the market value of the shares on the date they are granted. While the filing did not offer a specific date, Oracle shares closed Tuesday at $24.26, which would value 10 million shares at $242.6 million. If he stays with the company, Hurd will be given options to buy another 5 million shares each year for the next five years. Oracle is not shy about handing out big salaries and bonuses. Founder and CEO Larry Ellison, among the world’s richest people, drew a pay package worth roughly $70 million for the company’s most recent fiscal year, according to an Associated Press analysis of Oracle’s securities filings. It included a base salary of $250,000, a performance-based bonus of $6.5 million, stock options valued at $61.9 million and other perks totaling $1.5 million. During HP’s most recent fiscal year, Hurd received a pay package as CEO valued at $24.2 million, according to an AP analysis. His base pay came to $1.3 million, with bonuses totaling $15.8 million and $6.6 million worth of restricted stock. Hurd’s future at Oracle was complicated Tuesday when Hewlett-Packard sued Hurd to keep him out of his new job. HP is worried Hurd will use his knowledge of the company to give Oracle an unfair advantage. Lawsuits of that kind often end with a court ordering an executive to avoid certain parts of their employers’ businesses. Hurd resigned from HP last month after five years as the company’s CEO. An investigation uncovered inaccurate expense reports related to Hurd’s outings with an actress and HP contractor named Jodie Fisher, who claimed that her work at HP dried up after she rebuffed Hurd’s advances. Hurd’s move to Oracle has injected new friction into Oracle’s relationship with HP. The two companies have cooperated for years, with HP selling corporate servers and Oracle providing the software that helps organize the information stored on them. But Oracle, which is based in Redwood City, Calif., moved into direct competition with HP in the hardware business when it bought Sun Microsystems for $7.4 billion last year.

Read the full article →

HP SUES Ex-CEO Mark Hurd Over New Job At Rival Oracle

September 7, 2010

SAN FRANCISCO — Hewlett-Packard Co. is suing the chief executive it ousted last month, Mark Hurd, to stop him from taking a top job at rival Oracle Corp. The lawsuit, filed Tuesday in a California state court, came a day after Oracle hired Hurd as co-president to help lead the database software maker as it tries to steal business from HP. It centers on HP’s claim that Hurd won’t be able to perform his job at Oracle without spilling HP’s trade secrets and violating a confidentiality agreement. This type of complaint isn’t unusual in the technology world, nor is the confidentiality agreement Hurd had signed as part of a severance package from HP that could top $40 million. Technology companies often require such agreements because workers walk out the door with valuable technical information. But the stakes are higher with Hurd than a rank-and-file employee. As HP’s CEO for five years, Hurd was responsible for preparing HP’s strategic plans and has intimate details about HP’s profit margins and special deals it has offered customers, according to the lawsuit. HP also insisted that Hurd was privy to a “highly confidential” analysis of Oracle’s competitiveness against HP. “Hurd’s actions are a serious threat to HP’s business,” HP lawyers wrote in the lawsuit, which was filed in California Superior Court for Santa Clara County. Unless stopped, HP said, Hurd would diminish the value of HP’s trade secrets, hurt customer relationships and “give Oracle a strategic advantage as to where to allocate or not allocate resources and exploit the knowledge of HP’s strengths and weaknesses.” Hurd and Oracle declined to comment. The lawsuit shows the growing rancor between the two companies, which are longtime partners that are now competing in the market for computer servers. HP itself was on the other end of this type of case last year, after it hired David Donatelli, a veteran of the data-storage industry, from EMC Corp. HP was temporarily prohibited from letting Donatelli start work as an executive vice president because of a lawsuit by EMC. A court later ruled that Donatelli could work for HP, but under certain restrictions that split up some of his responsibilities. Shares of HP, which is based on Palo Alto, fell 36 cents, or 0.9 percent, to $39.98 in afternoon trading Tuesday. Shares of Oracle, based in Redwood City, increased $1.43, or 6 percent, to $24.35.

Read the full article →

Elizabeth Cordry: Why Fashion Seemingly Snubs the Internet: A Defensive

August 24, 2010

It is a truth universally acknowledged that the fashion industry has been notoriously slow to catch on to digital media. The few brands that have taken tentative steps towards using the internet to its full advantage, such as Burberry and Chanel, are being lauded as progressive, but when compared to other industries fashion is still woefully behind. From journalism and retail, to the back-end of wholesale buying, the fashion industry has on the whole squeaked along in the same way that it has for many years. Many observers blame this state of affairs on the industry’s concern for maintaining exclusivity; other say the internet simply is too ugly, not “on-brand” for high-end companies. These arguments have merits, but I believe they slow the process rather than stall it. It is possible that there is also a deeper structural issue in the industry that explains much of the trepidation. The fashion industry is one of the few creative industries that has never had to rely on technology to distribute its product. The film industry has navigated the transition from VCRs to DVDs to video downloads from a number of different devices. The music industry has transitioned from records to cassettes to CDs to music downloads. They have also long understood the value of creating content in a different medium, with Michael Jackson’s “Thriller” awakening the industry to the power of video. The fashion industry, on the other hand, has not transitioned in the same way. Clothes are still sold primarily in stores, where customers can have tangible access to the fabrics and fits. Perhaps more significantly, fashion still photography and the print editorial have long been the central medium for fashion journalism. All this adds up to an industry-wide lack of experience with, and knowledge of, technological developments. There is an argument to be made that it is this knowledge gap that is the most significant factor in slowing the transition to the online medium. Certainly the argument against selling clothes online is a strong one. It is hard to see how to fully communicate the value of a garment you can’t touch or try on. Moreover, clothes often just don’t look as good on a screen as they do on a body. However, what you lose in an up-close, physical, view of the dress and a luxurious store environment, you gain in the ability to communicate context, design inspiration, manufacturing background and the quality of the product. People who make this argument are forgetting that print magazines have been inspiring purchases since they were born, a sure sign that you don’t always need to see it on a hanger. The astounding success of Net-a-Porter also does a lot to disprove this theory. Print editorial seems to be the medium that is more at fault for their lack of internet adventures, although the defense here is strong too. The argument that editorial photographs do not translate as well on screen is true — they just don’t. But there seems to have been surprisingly little progress made in the realm of editorial video. All you need to see is the first ten minutes of “Breakfast at Tiffany’s” to understand the power of film in selling a look. What the challenge seems to be here is not the production, but the method of distribution. Fashion on TV has become associated with cheesy reality programming, such as “The Rachel Zoe Project,” “Project Runway” and “The Hills.” And the internet is, well, intimidating. This comes back to the central argument: industry leaders, having never had to dip their manicured toes into anything digital before, are struggling with a lack of experience. They are having a hard time understanding the power of the internet, let alone figuring out how to overcome the many challenges it provides. For there are many. Brands that have a very clear identity and idea of how to communicate themselves in traditional media are having to reinvent their message online. There is no room for error in branding, and they are going to get it right. The problem of the categorical ugliness of most of the internet is compounded by its new association with off-price sale sites like Gilt Groupe, and for the fact that when one thinks of online fashion journalism, one’s mind turns to 13 year old bloggers rather than to established industry authorities. But as the opportunity cost of staying offline has grown, these problems have turned from barriers of entry to challenges to overcome, and will in no way block future growth of the fashion industry online. The industry is made of the kind of people who can brand the be-jesus out of a PVC handbag. They’ll figure out the short-term issues with translating their brand online. Thus there is an argument to be made that the industry is not fearful, nor snobbish, nor ignorant. They simply lack the experience, and are aware of the fact. The fashion industry is simply biding their time, educating themselves, and planning with rigorous accuracy their branding attack. Elizabeth Cordry works in retail and online development at Rag & Bone in New York. She is the author of the blog www.fashionconnected.com , focusing on the fashion industry’s transition to the online world.

Read the full article →

Karen Luniw: Success in the City: Leveraging Your Brilliance

August 13, 2010

Did you know that right now, right this moment you have the ability with what you already have to leverage your own personal brilliance in order to build your business? Well, you do. One of my favorite things to share with groups I speak to is about how their brain works. Often people claim that their processing capability is less than what I’m about to share with you but no matter how you slice it — it is incomprehensible. The shame is that we don’t always use it to leverage ourselves in our business. The fact is, we work way too hard. Do you go through your day expecting to come across the million-dollar idea? (It’s all relative – for some a million isn’t going to cut it — for others, it’s over and beyond) Next question: Would you be able to recognize the million dollar idea if you saw it? Most people say ‘yes’ at this point. I say it’s not likely they would. This is where we need to start to leverage what you already have — your focus. The fact is, day in and day out, we tend to focus on what’s in front of us and if we’re in business or trying to make a quota — what we’re usually focused on is the problem. C’mon, be honest and think about yesterday — what did you spend most of your day thinking about? It’s a rare bird that can say they were focused solely on the good that’s happening around them. The way our brain works means that whatever we’re focused on, whatever messages we constantly feed it (which turn into beliefs) in turn sets off a mechanism that I compare to a huge radar dish that is constantly scanning the environment to prove us right. I’ll repeat that – whatever we consciously choose to focus on – our brain looks for in order to prove us right….whether it’s right or wrong. Ever lose your keys temporarily? When you did, you were likely muttering to yourself, ‘I can’t find my keys,’ ‘They’re not here.’ Notice what you’re prompting your brain to do. You’re prompting it to prove you right even though your subconscious mind can process over 400 billion bytes of information per second and it knows EXACTLY where your keys are — it can’t send your conscious mind that sensory information because it would be contradicting your focus that ‘the keys are not here.’ It’s the same with us at work. If we’re constantly focused on the problem or the challenges that are facing us — we will find them — it cannot be any other way. The great news is that you can leverage this knowledge and create an almost unfair advantage in your work and business. If you truly start to shift your focus to be expecting the million dollar idea to show up — your subconscious will start to scan the environment for it. This is the first thing you can do to start leveraging your brilliance for your business. If the million dollar idea is there (and it is) if you keep your focus – you will have no choice but to see it. This is just the start in leveraging your brilliance — next, I’ll share how the power of your story can attract all the business you want and how an amazing natural law proves that you can have what you desire for your self and your business. Remember, if you want this to be easier, contact me and we can work together to make this process easier, faster and with great results!! Karen Luniw is the author of Attraction in Action: Your How to Guide to Relationships, Money, Work and Health and is a coach who helps people break through blocks in their personal and business lives. For inspiration, check out her Top 10 Law of Attraction Tips for 2010 movie. There are huge clues in the movie to help you move further towards your goals.

Read the full article →

Ryan Mack: "Shape-Up" Your Finances

August 10, 2010

On August 7, 2010, the Optimum Institute of Economic Empowerment took to the streets to conduct the most fun program that we have ever done. We conducted the “Shape Up Your Finances” Economic Empowerment tour which consisted of visiting barbershops and beauty salons throughout Brooklyn, NY with the intent of igniting conversations about one of the most infrequently talked about topics that you hear in the barbershop: fiscal responsibility. Sure you might hear about how much money other people are making, such as that famous athlete who signed that multimillion dollar contract. You might hear about how much money that famous celebrity spent on his/her wedding. However, why is there hardly ever a conversation about the importance of building personal wealth and how to go about doing it? This is what this tour addressed but this also leads to a larger issue…why are we so timid to talk about money? The economy crashed in 2007 because of many factors, but one of the largest factors that lead to the demise of U.S. markets and global markets was fiscal irresponsibility on multiple levels. The government was spending money frivolously, corporations were taking excessive uncovered risk (well…not covered by them but certainly covered by the taxpayer), and too many people were spending tomorrow’s money while racking up debt today. Our control over the government and corporations is limited. We can have our voices heard in the voting booth and lobby for change which may or may not work immediately, or ever. However, we certainly have control over our own personal finances and how we manage them. The problem is too few know how, or choose not to listen to conventional wisdom, when it comes to managing money. One of the best ways to fix this problem is to incorporate this into a regular topic of conversation for the sake of providing more exposure to this problem. What would have happened if that person who planned to purchase a home who had a 550 FICO score, no money in the bank, and an income that is inconsistent at best had overheard a conversation about the most responsible way to purchase a home? What would have happened if that 35-year-old man who was living at home with his mother, between jobs, and still wanted to figure out a way to lease a new Range Rover because it was cool, overheard a conversation about the dangers of consumption and how to start a new business? What would have happened if that mother who lived in public housing with a room full of furniture from Rent-A-Center overheard a conversation about financial predators and how much money we waste on interest that we could have saved? What would have happened to these people…better yet, what would have happened to our country? We yell and scream at the television screen for change but turn right around and throw our change in the garbage. More than in the barbershop, we need to talk about our personal finances around the dinner table. We need to talk about our personal finances with our friends and family members. If you are going to a great personal finance workshop, have a financial planner who really takes the time to teach you about money, or finish reading a great book by an author like Suze Orman, tell somebody about it! Blast the information on Facebook, send it to your group on Linkedin, call a friend and let them know what you have learned. It is no longer acceptable for any of us to have this mindset that we are going to grow by ourselves. Sharing information is paramount if we are going to start a movement of social change as it relates to our finances. On the other side, if you hear someone talking about money, pay attention. What are they saying? Are they correct? Take the information and go home and read a few books to see if what they are saying is correct. It is great to take information from people, but your knowledge base should be the best defense against being led astray. You don’t have to be a financial expert, but you should know at least the basics about money before you see a financial advisory, mortgage broker, accountant, or any other advisor who can have an impact on your finances. If I know that by stealing a car I will go to prison if I get caught, that doesn’t make me as smart as an attorney…that only means that I have enough knowledge of law to keep myself out of trouble. The same principle applies to your personal finances. The Optimum Institute of Economic Empowerment is a nonprofit that is trying its best to participate in a grass roots effort to change the way we think, feel, and act with our money! To see a video clip of the “Shape Up Your Finances” Empowerment Tour click here… http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u7ceJh3fRCI

Read the full article →

Rebecca Abrahams: Document Hold Filed Against U.S. Chamber of Commerce & American Crossroads for Alleged Money Laundering, Insider Talks

August 9, 2010

Election fraud attorney Bob Fitrakis is sending letters today to attorneys representing the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and American Crossroads requesting that they retain all documents, emails, accounting records and other records. This “document hold” is the first step toward legal action based on the groups’ alleged laundering of illegal campaign contributions from large corporations. Fitrakis, in a telephone interview, explained, “We are planning on notifying the groups [as part of our] investigation and we’re requesting that they hold all those documents pertaining to what we believe is an illegal money laundering scheme.” The Chamber, run by its CEO Tom Donohue, serves as the political attack dog for big business, spending hundreds of millions to crush attorneys general and judges friendly to the corporations. In 2008 alone, the Chamber spent nearly $35 million almost entirely on Republican pro-business candidates in state and federal elections. According to SourceWatch, the Chamber has an aggressive strategy to rein in “activist judges and attorneys general,” and challenge anti-business measures in court, taking a lead role in tort reform and supporting pro-tort reform candidates. The strategy is brilliant. Donohue solicits millions from corporations facing class action suits and tort liability to fund these campaigns, all the while providing anonymous cover for corporate giants. In many cases, the Chamber masks its own involvement through front groups. Fitrakis says the Chamber has funneled illegal campaign contributions through groups like Citizens for a Strong Ohio, the Law Enforcement Association of America and many others, serving as the central point of a wide scale money laundering scam. “We know in the past the Chamber directly solicited various major donors – primarily people connected with transnational corporations. So that was part of that process. And also we know that they used then Governor Taft in Ohio back in 2002 and he ended up, of course, pleading guilty to multiple misdemeanor charges of accepting gifts from lobbyists. So it appears well known politicians are solicited and in some cases, the Chamber twists the arms of people but sometimes they don’t have to do that to get these anonymous donations. And then they kind of steer them all to one organization and they move them around to targeted politicians.” The goal, Fitrakis says is to create an unbalanced right wing court. “What they really want to do is control the Supreme Court here in Ohio as they successfully did in Texas because that allows them to do a variety of things. They can promise things like pro-corporate decisions because they know if they eliminate the entire opposition, which is what they did in Ohio. They took a moderate court in the ’90s which was 4-3 Republican to Democrat [sic] and with a couple of Republicans, at least one, having a very moderate, slim vote and they were able to essentially stack the entire court with Republicans that all lean strongly towards corporations. And if you don’t really have any balance on the court itself none of the other judges, if they’re all from one party and one mindset are all pro-corporate, you know those people aren’t going to raise the ethical issues in private or in public and that’s what you want – clearly judges that have a multi-national corporate perspective that know they’ve been elected by essentially illegal, anonymous money laundering schemes.” Fitrakis says there’s also a connection between the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the 2004 presidential election in Ohio as well as in other areas of the country. He says the Chamber is now directly linked to American Crossroads, a Republican political organization led by Karl Rove and its recent 501c4 spinoff, American Crossroads GPS. Former Chamber counsel Steven Law is now working for American Crossroads. “It looks like a systematic attempt connected to the Chamber, which was [previously] recognized by the Ohio Election Commission to move anonymous money into the state, and the question now is whether or not American Crossroads involves the same people. Because Karl Rove has been tied to a lot of these tactics in the past and it looks like American Crossroads may be little more than the latest extension following the Supreme Court decision in Citizens United. There’s a variety of groups moving in trying to set up anonymous donations now in the state.” Last January, a sharply divided Supreme Court ruled 5-4 that the government may not ban corporate political spending in candidate elections. But the Court did uphold the right of states to enact other campaign finance laws including those requiring the disclosure of contributions. But Fitrakis says that donating to the U.S. Chamber or to American Crossroads runs counter to these laws. “When you look at why you do that, you know they’re doing more than mere public advocacy. They’re creating something where they can hide who’s really behind the curtain and the job of course, is to rip that curtain back and when you do, it’s usually the same people – large companies, corporations that want the entire economy deregulated and that’s why in fact you create the 501c4 and eventually they’ll create a 501c3. Because really all you have to do is adjourn the meeting, the non-profit meets and we have a long tradition of anonymous donations and then the 501c4 meets and it can do a little more in advocacy but it’s not a 527. But the key factor is that the donations can be anonymous. It’s a great business without transparency, without being accountable.” Fitrakis may be on to something. According to a letter from a U.S. Chamber of Commerce employee, who wishes to remain anonymous, companies that give money to the Chamber are promised their donations will not be disclosed, even to the Government. “They are given specific instructions on how to circumvent campaign finance regulations. This is what Mr. Donohue uses to up the ante with companies so they will give more money. Mr. Donohue has given these same instructions to our lobbyists to pass on to companies… Mr. Donohue also promises companies that the Chamber’s lawyers, lobbyists and public relations will provide a wall of protection for them in case they have any troubles with regulators or law enforcement officials, and he uses examples of past members who have been able to hide behind the Chamber…. It is a fact that the Chamber coordinates directly with the Republican Party on issues, ads, legislation, candidates and everything else. Steve Law is in daily contact with Mr. Donohue and he was chosen to lead the Karl Rove group American Crossroads so there would be that coordination. That group is the de facto Republican National Committee.” The insider adds Donohue is also milking the Chamber’s corporate donors to support his lavish lifestyle but could not confirm whether the Chamber has filed false reports to the IRS. “I can say for certain that there is a vast amount of secrecy about what money comes in and what it is used for. I can say that there have been large cash transactions that have taken place that I do not believe have been ever placed in any accounting system. I also know that money meant for one thing has actually been redirected to another thing on orders from Mr. Donohue and without the knowledge of the company that gave the money. I also know that if there was an audit done of the Chamber’s finances and cross referenced to those companies that gave money, there would be vast discrepancies between income and outlays.” The whistleblower says Donohue is arrogant enough to believe that even if he is exposed that he can still beat the system. “Can he be caught? Here is his attitude. The Federal Election Commission will not do anything to him because it has no power. Congress will not do anything because he owns too many of the members. So the only thing he fears is the United States Department of Justice, but he already has a game plan if he hears even a words that they are going to investigate him – attack, accuse the DOJ of a political hit job, call on his Republican allies to demand Eric Holder’s job.” Bob Fitrakis served on the legal team that sued the U.S. Chamber of Commerce for creating a front group called Citizens For A Strong Ohio. The organization solicited corporations for funding by promising them anonymity and used those funds to run attack ads against Ohio Supreme Court Justice Alice Resnick, in violation of Ohio’s campaign finance laws. In 2003 the Ohio Elections Commission and three courts ruled that the Chamber had to reveal the names of campaign ad backers.

Read the full article →

Natalie Holder-Winfield: When Victims of Discrimination Take Matters Into Their Own Hands

August 4, 2010

Immediately after reading the news flash about another unfortunate shooting in a Connecticut workplace, I said a prayer for wounded and then searched for information about the shooter’s motivation. I was not surprised when I read on CNN.com that the alleged shooter told his uncle, “I killed the five racists that was there that was bothering me.” As in most instances of workplace violence, the alleged shooter was probably a victim of unchecked discrimination. Earlier this year, Yale New Haven Hospital suffered a tragic loss when a doctor was shot and killed by a former colleague who also alleged discrimination. While Hartford Distributors–a family owned beer distributor–denies that Omar Thornton, the alleged shooter, ever complained about discrimination, I found it interesting that they did not mention whether their company provided training to educate their employees about preventing, detecting and correcting workplace discrimination. As an employment lawyer who conducts compliance training, I know that some companies view diversity, anti-discrimination, and harassment training as a frill. Begrudgingly, they will hold compliance training sessions if it is mandated by a lawsuit or statute. (Although Connecticut employers with at least 20 employees are required to provide at least two hours of anti-harassment training every two years to their managers, there is a huge question mark as to whether companies are in compliance. To my knowledge, the CT Commission on Human Rights has not conducted an audit recently.) Yet, organizations like the U.S. Veterans Administration have experienced tremendous value from workforce training. A few years ago, the VA found that compared to the US Postal Service, they had more cases of physical and verbal violence. In 2008, 250,000 VA employees reported that a co-worker had engaged in exclusionary behaviors such as gossiping, withholding information, and bullying. In response, the VA embarked on a comprehensive training campaign to improve workplace civility called Civility Respect and Engagement in the Workplace (CREW). Understanding that workplace safety is connected to workplace inclusion, the CREW training programs tackled issues of supervisor diversity acceptance, worker reliability, and a host of other workplace violence indicators. As a result, workplace civility and workplace satisfaction have increased and discrimination complaints have decreased at the VA. Until companies understand that compliance training is a proactive investment, they will continue to be on the reactive end of brewing workplace disputes. If employees do not know how to handle workplace disputes, sadly, they may take matters into their own hands. Compliance training is about empowering people with information about their rights and responsibilities. The last thing Connecticut needs is for workplace violence to become a steady habit.

Read the full article →

AirTight Appoints Steve Choi Managing Director, Asia-Pacific Sales

August 2, 2010

Choi Brings Deep Knowledge of Network Infrastructure Environment and Culture of Pacific Rim

Read the full article →

Kenneth Starr’s Bail Set At $10 Million, Judge Wants Brothers’ Homes As Collateral

July 28, 2010

NEW YORK — A jailed financial adviser to the stars can get out on bail if his two brothers change their minds and put up their houses as collateral, a Manhattan judge ruled Tuesday. At a brief hearing, U.S. District Judge Shira Scheindlin decided Kenneth Starr could leave jail and be put under house arrest at his Manhattan apartment if he posted a $10 million bond secured by his brothers’ homes and other property. Prosecutors allege Starr’s Ponzi-like scheme from January 2008 through April cheated elderly and wealthy clients out of $59 million. He’s been behind bars since his arrest in May on securities fraud. Starr, 66, has worked with Wesley Snipes, Sylvester Stallone and Martin Scorsese, though there’s no indication they were victims. Defense attorney Laura Edwards told the judge that her client’s brothers – a lawyer and a scientist – were reluctant to offer their homes. Instead, one agreed to put up his rare book collection valued at $1.7 million to secure a smaller bond. “These books are like his children,” the lawyer said. Starr’s wife, Diane Passage, assured the judge her husband wasn’t a flight risk as prosecutors contend. “He’s not going anywhere,” she said. But the judge wasn’t convinced, and said the houses were needed as well to secure a $10 million bond. “Either they really believe in the guy or they don’t,” Scheindlin said of the brothers. Court papers say that Starr diverted investors’ money into risky investments – or into his own pockets – without their knowledge. In one instance, he funneled $5.75 million from the account of a 100-year-old heiress to buy a luxury five-bedroom apartment for $7.5 million without her knowledge, according to court filings. Prosecutors allege that when clients demanded funds he didn’t have, he would use money from other investors to pay them. One of several bank accounts linked to Starr, who’s wife is a former stripper, is held under the name “Poledance Superstar,” an indictment says. The government is seeking forfeiture of that account and several others.

Read the full article →

David M. Abromowitz: Shirley Sherrod: Beyond the Media Circus, Lessons for Economic Progress

July 26, 2010

Shirley Sherrod should have been a household name long before this week’s media frenzy — but for reasons most of the country knows little about. For decades, Ms. Sherrod has been fighting for economic justice and access to property for those who have been left out of the system. Starting back in the 1960s, she and her family were at the center of an effort that assembled nearly 6,000 acres of land in the south for farmers who had lost control of their land. Inspired by the Jewish National Fund and other groups that held land in trust, New Communities, Inc., fused the civil rights movement with ideas about economic justice into an ambitious plan to provide ownership stability for large numbers of small farmers. But the land was ultimately lost again, as government officials withheld access to credit that was necessary to save their effort. Such discriminatory practices were ultimately successfully challenged in a class action lawsuit documenting decades of USDA wrongdoing. In the full video that was manipulated to portray her as a racist, Ms. Sherrod instead advocates for economic justice for all. She puts the economic tidal wave that has affected so many of those in the lower middle end of the economic spectrum into a framework that moves past race. Her approach is timely, given current debates over where to target efforts to boost the economy. Credit is the lifeblood of any economy. Those who get access to credit on fair and reasonable terms tends to prosper. Those who get credit on predatory terms fall further behind. The legacy of treatment of African-American farmers in the south is one of denial of credit, leading to dependence on predatory credit, and finally the loss of lands on a huge scale. Though well-documented, though admitted by the United States, these farmers still cannot get their compensation appropriated. In Chicago of the 1950s and 1960s, as in many parts of the country, the United States Federal Housing Administration determined that minority neighborhoods were inherently bad risks. Middle class homebuyers who had saved substantial down payments, and whose income was sufficient to make monthly mortgage payments, nevertheless still could not get a mortgage where the FHA had redlined a neighborhood. With normal credit options constrained, many buyers paid more for a house than it was worth, turning to contract sale arrangements where a single missed payment meant the loss of years of savings. And in the subprime flood of bad loans into hundreds of communities that surged between 2000 and 2006, those who had trouble accessing normal credit channels again became prey to the peddlers of dangerous loans. Certainly some borrowers were on the make for a fast deal with cheap money. But many subprime borrowers were fully qualified for safer, fixed rate prime loans, yet were not being served by our regular banking system. Time and again, middle-income and lower-income Americans have been unable to get credit on consumer-oriented, fair terms. Home loans, farm loans, credit cards and access to property ownership are far easier to obtain for those who do not have to overcome the misperceptions of those who often control access to credit. And when average families then need to turn to bad credit products, whole segments of the population are set back and lose gains toward building wealth. As Elizabeth Warren wrote so cogently when calling three years ago for a Consumer Financial Products Safety Commission: Indeed, the pain imposed by a dangerous credit product is even more insidious than that inflicted by a malfunctioning kitchen appliance. If toasters are dangerous, they may burn down the homes of rich people or poor people, college graduates or high-school dropouts. But credit products are not nearly so egalitarian. Wealthy families can ignore the tricks and traps associated with credit card debt, secure in the knowledge that they won’t need to turn to credit to get through a rough patch. Their savings will protect them from medical expenses that exceed their insurance coverage or the effects of an unexpected car repair; credit cards are little more than a matter of convenience. Working- and middle-class families are far less insulated. For the family who lives closer to the economic margin, a credit card with an interest rate that unexpectedly escalates to 29.99 percent or misplaced trust in a broker who recommends a high-priced mortgage can push a family into a downward economic spiral from which it may never recover. Many will take away from the Shirley Sherrod media incident merely that fact checking is vital when information is so easy to manipulate. But there are more important lessons to be learned. The productive economic energies of average Americans are too often smothered in a morass of bad credit products, traps for the unwary, and terms that make it hard to build wealth. Passing a financial reform bill, promulgating a new set of credit card regulations, or revamping the housing financing market, are not enough. We need teeth in their enforcement, and a concerted effort to level the playing field between consumers and their sources of credit. If we fail to do so, no one should be surprised to see more and more of the middle class fall economically behind, unable to recover alongside the financial sector’s recovery. David Abromowitz is a Senior Fellow at the Center for American Progress, www.Americanprogress.org .

Read the full article →

Jeff Merkley For Warren: I’ve Told The White House To Appoint Her

July 24, 2010

The gathering of online and progressive activists at the Netroots Nation convention this year has produced a fairly overt and direct campaign to get Elizabeth Warren appointed as the first head of the newly created Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. Of the speakers addressing the recently passed regulatory reform bill, nearly every one has said the Harvard professor is best suited to head the board that she originally conceived. AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka, for example, called Warren the only choice to head the consumer agency. Since this remains a political appointment, such advocacy matters only to the extent that it influences the president, the man who will ultimately make the choice, as well as the Senate, the body who will likely have to vote on Warren’s candidacy. On the latter front, Warren’s defenders got a bit of a boost on Saturday, with Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.) making a forceful case for her appointment and disclosing that he’s been lobbying the administration on this front “I support Elizabeth Warren,” the Oregon Democrat said in an interview with the Huffington Post. “I have advocated for the administration to back her. She has both the clarity of the need for an agency that has as its top mission protecting citizens against tricks, traps and scams, and she has the ability to articulate that vision. She has the leadership skills and the knowledge of the financial world. She has the full set of requirements to be an effective leader. So I certainly hope the administration will [take my advice].” With an appointment to the consumer board coming, in all likelihood, in the near future, Merkley’s endorsement is one of the first publicly offered by a sitting Senator. Indeed, there has been as much concern raised over Warren’s confirmation prospects as there has been advocacy on her behalf. Senate Banking Committee Chairman Chris Dodd (D-Conn.) said recently that he wasn’t sure if Warren would get the 60 votes necessary for confirmation. For Merkley, the case for Warren is not just about the individual attributes she’d bring to the post, but also the various shortcomings of the just-passed regulatory reform legislation. A leading proponent of stricter rules to clamp down on the financial services industry, Merkley acknowledged feeling trepidation that the final legislative product left too much power to the judgment of the regulators. Having a strong advocate in a key post, in short, had become a vital ingredient to the legislation’s success. Warren, he said, would be that type of regulator.

Read the full article →

Jeff Merkley For Warren: I’ve Told The White House To Appoint Her

July 24, 2010

The gathering of online and progressive activists at the Netroots Nation convention this year has produced a fairly overt and direct campaign to get Elizabeth Warren appointed as the first head of the newly created Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. Of the speakers addressing the recently passed regulatory reform bill, nearly every one has said the Harvard professor is best suited to head the board that she originally conceived. AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka, for example, called Warren the only choice to head the consumer agency. Since this remains a political appointment, such advocacy matters only to the extent that it influences the president, the man who will ultimately make the choice, as well as the Senate, the body who will likely have to vote on Warren’s candidacy. On the latter front, Warren’s defenders got a bit of a boost on Saturday, with Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.) making a forceful case for her appointment and disclosing that he’s been lobbying the administration on this front “I support Elizabeth Warren,” the Oregon Democrat said in an interview with the Huffington Post. “I have advocated for the administration to back her. She has both the clarity of the need for an agency that has as its top mission protecting citizens against tricks, traps and scams, and she has the ability to articulate that vision. She has the leadership skills and the knowledge of the financial world. She has the full set of requirements to be an effective leader. So I certainly hope the administration will [take my advice].” With an appointment to the consumer board coming, in all likelihood, in the near future, Merkley’s endorsement is one of the first publicly offered by a sitting Senator. Indeed, there has been as much concern raised over Warren’s confirmation prospects as there has been advocacy on her behalf. Senate Banking Committee Chairman Chris Dodd (D-Conn.) said recently that he wasn’t sure if Warren would get the 60 votes necessary for confirmation. For Merkley, the case for Warren is not just about the individual attributes she’d bring to the post, but also the various shortcomings of the just-passed regulatory reform legislation. A leading proponent of stricter rules to clamp down on the financial services industry, Merkley acknowledged feeling trepidation that the final legislative product left too much power to the judgment of the regulators. Having a strong advocate in a key post, in short, had become a vital ingredient to the legislation’s success. Warren, he said, would be that type of regulator.

Read the full article →

David Isenberg: The GAO Transcripts, Part 15: Coordination is Easier Said Than Done

July 17, 2010

This is the fifteenth installment of the Government Accountability Office interview transcripts that were prepared pursuant to the July 2005 GAO report ” Rebuilding Iraq: Actions Needed To Improve Use of Private Security Providers .” This transcript illustrates that nearly two years after the U.S. invaded Iraq the U.S. authorities’ still had little ability to keep track of private security contractors, as this passage illustrates: ROC currently does not have the manpower necessary to maintain a database of contractors __________ emphasized that contractors are not contractually required to participate in the PCO’s ROC. Registration of contractors at the PCO is not cross-checked against a database of PSCs. The ROC does not maintain an attendance roster of PSCs Interestingly, some companies took avoidable risks, such as “driving their cargo like a stagecoach” (i.e. driving without any protection or without notifying the military of their actions)” which should have raised their insurance costs. The transcript also mentions a delicate topic, which is not talked about all that often in public, i.e. shooting incidents between contractors and soldiers: Have there been any “blue on blue” or friendly fire incidents due to the military being unaware of private security contractors in their sector? There are many Blue on Blue incidents, but not because the military was not aware that PSCs were in their sector. 5. Can you site any situations in which the military has fired upon a private security contractor or contractor or vice versa? YES. What conditions led to this situation? Conditions range from poor fire discipline on the part of soldiers to deep anxiety and nervousness borne of many SVBIED (Suicide Vehicle Born Improvised Explosive Device) attacks. How does the PCO’s ROC prevent friendly fire? The ROC documents cases of blue on blue and engages MNFI over them. It has proposed improvements to facilitate better coordination between PSCs and the military. It has provided PSCs with recommended TTPs for avoiding such incidents. Through the LMCC, it has enabled the military to have visibility on whom is in their AO. Finally, given that the Commission Wartime Contracting held a hearing last month on ” Are Private Security Contractors Performing Inherently Governmental Functions? ” this passage should be of interest: We have heard from several contractors that there is concern that __________ [Aegis] not sufficiently fulfilling their contract and that they are wary of sharing information with a peer. Many contractors believe that communication function performed under the___________ contract is an innately governmental position and should be performed by a DOD entity. Because of these concerns, several contractors have stated that they will utilize the PCO’s resources but do not place much faith in the program? Engaging in firefights with terrorists is also an innately governmental position, but unless the government chooses to provide manpower far above current levels, we must rely on contractors to provide shooters, communicators and other experts fulfilling critical roles. Standard disclaimer: I have put in ( _____ ) to reflect those words of phrases which have been blacked out in the transcript. I have also put in the underlining as it appeared in the original transcript. As in the transcript, I have left out letters from various words, even when it seems obvious what the word is. Prepared. by: Kate Walker Index: Type bundle index here Date Prepared: January 9, 2005 DOC Number: Type document number here Reviewed by: Type reviewer name hem DOC Library: Type 1ibrary name here Job Code: 350544 Record of Interview Title VTC with PCO, Baghdad Purpose To learn about status of the PCO Contact Method Video-conference Contact Place GAO HQ and Baghdad, Iraq Contact Date January 18, 2005 Participants __________ __________ __________ __________ __________ ____________________ ____________________ __________ __________ __________ __________ __________ __________ __________ __________ __________ __________ __________ __________ __________ __________ __________ __________ __________ __________ __________ Tim DiNapoli, Assistant Director, ASM, GAO Carole Coffey, Analyst in Charge, DCM, GAO Kate Walker, Analyst, DCM, GAO Chris Durbin, Analyst, DCM, GAO Mike Avenick, Analyst, DCM, GAO Comments/Remarks: We met with several members of the Project Contracting Office (PCO) staff and the Logistic Management Coordination Center (LMCC) via video-conference. __________ in Baghdad, led the discussion. He opened our meeting by emphasizing that the theatre in Iraq is unprecedented and that lessons are being learned every day as the PCO adapts to the changing environment. __________ entioned that in addition to the items raised in our questions, the PCO would also like to address 1) PSB Insurance __________ Page 1 Record of Interview __________ __________ 2) the creation of a government armory to distribute weapons locally in Iraq. In response to our questions regarding the handover of the PCO to USACE, __________ ndicated that the rumor of the demise of the PCO was premature and that only parts of the PCO will be migrating to other areas. For example, USACE will maintain control of the administration of reconstruction projects. PCO contracting authority was moved to the GRD. Administrative contracting officer responsibility was sent to the GRD after the task order was issued. In September 2005, the PCO contracting was to be assimilated into GRD contracting. Below follows the list of questions we sent the PCO and their responses. I have annotated their responses with notes from our conversation. Current Status of the PCO and Security 1. Is the PCO currently disseminating information on the security situation to contractors and guiding contractor movement? Via the Regional Operation Center (ROC) at the PCO. 2. Which contractors are actively participating with the PCO? Participating contractors include, but are not limited to __________ __________ __________ __________ What resources does the PCO’s ROC offer to PCO contractors? 1. Operations 2. Information 3. Coordination Non-PCO contractors? Same PCO subcontractors? Same Does the PCO maintain a database of participating contractors? Yes. Participation is voluntary, but registration, to the best of my knowledge is not cross-checked against a database of PCO security contractors (because a database does not exist). (** Analyst note: __________ noted that the PCO’s ROC has only been up and working since mid-October 2004 and that the ROC is still working out some kinks. The PCO’s ROC serves as a facilitator for cooperation and advocacy for PSCs. __________ dicated that the PCO’s ROC currently does not have the manpower necessary to maintain a database of contractors __________ emphasized that contractors are not contractually required to participate in the PCO’s ROC. Registration of contractors at the PCO is not cross-checked against a database of PSCs. The ROC does not maintain an attendance roster of PSCs, however, all primes and subs are welcome to participate. __________ elieves that the ROC has been successful and sites that the UN and the Iraqi ministry have contacted the PCO regarding participation in the ROC. __________ r to send number of billets and staff at PCO. The original design-build contractors had to provide all the security and life services. This was found to be cost-prohibitive and contractors have found a middle meeting ground by utilizing the PCO’s LMCC and ROC. There was an initial handshake agreement that if contractors participated in the PCO’s ROC and LMCC then medical and security responses would be provided to them. By having contractors participate in the LMCC, there was also hope that the cost of insurance for contractors in Iraq would decrease because the contractors would be better Page 2 Record of Interview protected. For example, those companies that are “driving their cargo like a stagecoach” (i.e. driving without any protection or without notifying the military of their actions) should expect to pay more in insurance than those that are driving on secured roads with contact to the ROC and LMCC. LMCC hopes to maximize the benefit of coordination and decrease the escalating costs of insurance. __________ informed us that the PCO has made aggressive attempts to try and get USAID to participate in the ROC and the LMCC, but USAID refused to participate. __________ described USAID as “not a team player .” For example, USAID transferred authority of the Baghdad International Airport (BIA) to the Iraqi Ministry, which is now refusing to transfer big-ticket weapons. The military and Department of State were not conferred on this decision. Me. Holly indicated that dating back to the 1970′s BIA was a notoriously poorly operating airport and that the Iraqis operating the airport were poorly trained. He believes that it was a poor decision to turn the airport over to the Iraqi’s and that the importation of weapons and necessary military equipment will be severely hampered. In another example, USAID would not participate on an Economic Security Board that sought to prioritize security in Iraq) 3. Is the PCO’s ROC fully operational and integrated with Iraq’s regional operation centers? If you’re referring to the Regional ROCs, the answer is yes. There is close coordination between the ROC and the RROCs. (** Analyst Note: There are six regional operation centers planned. Only two of these operation centers are not fully operational–Camp Victory and Ramadi. Camp Victory has a life support problem. Ramadi is operating in a very dangerous work environment and is standing up a team in Fallujah until the Ramadi site is fully operational. __________ ndicated that Rarnadi has a very close relationship with the 1st MEF Marines unit in Fallujah. __________ ssed what steps would be taken to ensure that the transition from the 1st MEF to the 2nd MEF would be smooth and would ensure that the strong relationship with the ROC at Ramadi would be continued __________ indicated that while there would be a few organizational changes in the GX at division HQ, overall he believes that the transition will not change the active relationship between the ROC and the MEF.) 4. What is the current security situation in Iraq? Depending on the particular area, this can be a tough, challenging, difficult environment. Even short distance trips are dangerous, time-consuming and expensive. Project sites are subject to attack and loss of materials and workers because of treats and intimidation. For the latest information on the security situation in Iraq, contact DIA J-2. How has this situation changed since the initial arrival of troops in Iraq? A ground war evolved into an insurgency featuring asymmetric warfare and terrorism. (** Analyst note: __________ndicated that defining the security situation in Iraq depends upon your frame of reference; the security situation varies depending on which area in Iraq is being discussed. __________ indicate that since the initial invasion of Iraq, the troops have gone from fighting a ground war to dealing with an insurgency.) Page 3 Record of interview 5. Which contractors participate with the PCO’s ROC? See above response to question 1. Can we have a list of participants? I do not maintain an attendance roster but am confident that 80 to 90% of the PSC community and all of the Primes and DBs are participating m ROC activities. Movement Coordination 1. Does Aegis help plan contractor movements? Yes, by its participation in the ROC. How does __________ oordinate movement across Iraq? Via the ROC and its close relationship with the LMCC. For example, doe __________ oordinate movement by contacting Regional Operation Center’s across Iraq? __________ and the RROCs are but two elements in movement coordination in Iraq, which features the LMCC and its Tapestry system, the ROC and its information, intelligence, coordination and operations services. (** Analyst Note: __________ ROC works with the LMCC, regional ROC’s, and the tapestry to plan movements. The LMCC takes the lead in movement planning and has visibility to MNFI. In order to plan and coordinate movement, LMCC has utilized transponders. Per their design-build contracts, contractors were originally required to supply all security and medical support for their projects. However, the continued combat situation in Iraq has made furnishment of this level of support financially unfeasible for contractors, so a mutually agreeable (with the ROC) system of registering movements and using transponders has developed. In spring 2004, the LMCC encouraged participating contractors to purchase their own transponders and participate in the LMCC’s operating system. The idea was for these contractors to purchase their own transponders but require these to have a common operating system among all contractors as well as a system that was compatible with the existing military transponder system. Contract modifications would have made these transponders government-furnished equipment (GFE). However, due to issues of oversight and interoperability problems, LMCC instead decided to purchase the transponders internally and distribute them to design-build contractors. The LMCC allocates one transponder for personnel movement and two transponders for convoy movement. After the LMCC originally decided to provide transponders for design-build contractors, 200 lower quality transponders were purchased due to the urgency and quick turn-over of the order. Thus, the military’s 20-25K transponders did not have an emergency button system that can be alerted when under attack. The LMCC has since purchased nearly 400 new transponders that have emergency buttons.) 2. How are handoffs between divisions boundaries handled? Are their any overall DOD/CENTCOM policies guiding handoffs between divisions? Movements are coordinated through the LMCC which registers the movements with the theater movement control cell (TMCC). Usually there are no movement coordination measures required crossing the boundary of one MSC to another. When a convoy approaches a checkpoint, regardless of the AOR (area of responsibility), the March Credit document suffices to allow passage. If, however, coordination is required for a strategic move (i.e., large generator w/ military escorts), coordination measures are established in an OPORD (Operation Order) Page 4 Record of interview issued through the ROC (Regional Operation Center) to MNFI SOC (Security Operations Center) for MNCI execution. (** Analyst Note: The LMCC registers movements with the TMCC. Currently, there are two systems for tracking movement in Iraq: (1) the March Credit system and (2) Tapestry. The March Credit system is a contractual obligation for passage between divisions. March Credit orders are issued by the control battalions. Once a contractor has applied for a March Credit order, they are then assigned an alphanumeric code. This code is validation that the military has received the movement order request and have notified all relevant parties on the route of movement that the contractor would be traveling in their AOR. Transponders under the Tapestry system allow for positive 1-2 minute updates on movements and validate March Credit order movements. In addition, a Fragmentary order (FRAGO) has been drafted that would require MNF (I) commanders to provide life support for certain contractors, including PSCs.) 3. Does the PCO inform division commanders of private security contractors moving into their AOR? Yes, if they are part of registered convoys or through the Tapestry system. (** Analyst note: Division commanders are informed of the registered convoy via the tapestry system.) 4. Have there been any “blue on blue” or friendly fire incidents due to the military being unaware of private security contractors in their sector? There are many Blue on Blue incidents, but not because the military was not aware that PSCs were in their sector. 5. Can you site any situations in which the military has fired upon a private security contractor or contractor or vice versa? YES. What conditions led to this situation? Conditions range from poor fire discipline on the part of soldiers to deep anxiety and nervousness borne of many SVBIED (Suicide Vehicle Born Improvised Explosive Device) attacks. How does the PCO’s ROC prevent friendly fire? The ROC documents cases of blue on blue and engages MNFI over them. It has proposed improvements to facilitate better coordination between PSCs and the military. It has provided PSCs with recommended TTPs for avoiding such incidents. Through the LMCC, it has enabled the military to have visibility on whom is in their AO. (** Analyst note: March Credit document ave seen a rise in blue-on-blue incidents in the past 2.5 months __________o send a copy of TTP’s regarding approaching the military.” __________ ndicated that he had given a briefing regarding blue-on-blue incidents in December 2004. To nowledge, there had been only one incident in which a PSC shot at the military.) Communication and Intelligence Sharing 1. To what extent can and are threat information shared between US military forces, the PCO, and other US government agencies? Limited. Could always be better. Growing. Foreign disclosure a problem. Page 5 Record of Interview 2. How does the PCO get intelligence/information from the military? FDO Pass-through. Is this information shared with PSCs? Yes. How is this intelligence shared with PSCs? In daily reports and spot reports or on an as requested basis. (** Analyst Note: __________ ndicated that the informal intelligence fusion from contractors and private security companies was typically much better than the information than the information that he received from the military about road conditions, etc. in certain areas of Iraq __________ does not believe that there have been any problems bringing intelligence down to the classified level for contractors. __________ ndicated that he utilized the Private ‘Security Company Association of Iraq (PSCAI) as a means to coordinate intelligence among private security contractors. For example, __________ indicated that he would often issue request for information (RP’1) through PSCAI’s email list to participating contractors. __________ would then share any information that he received with other private security contractor. __________ believes that the ROC helps to support the PSCAI’s communication and information sharing efforts. __________ indicated that the ROC was having a hard time getting SIPR or CENTRIX access at the PCO. The PCO has requested the appropriate authorities for access to SIPR. The PCO also has problems with phone accessibility; DSN access has been difficult as well.) 3. In our previous phone conversation with __________, we learned that __________ operates a password protected website. What type of information is found on this website? Ops/Int Who has access to this website? Registered & approved individuals. What is the process for achieving access to the website? Go to brief.aegisiraq.com Can we have access to the website? Yes. (** Analyst Note: __________ ____________________ __________ ____________________ 4. What is the PCO’s relationship with the Overseas Advisory Council (OSAC)? Limited. OSAC is not very active and is limited to Americans–a small part of the PSC community. Does the PCOC use OSAC as a means of communication with private security contractors and contractors in Iraq? No. 5. How have you communicated the PCO’s ROC mission with contractors and PSCs? Through the PSCAI, and word of mouth. How do contractors learn about the PCO’s ROC and its resources? Well, the contractors ask questions, the ROC advertises its capabilities to whoever wants to listen. 6. Are there procedures that contractors must follow when contacting the PCO? Who are they contacting in the PCO? How do private security contractors and the PCO communicate? Email, phone and face to face. Can private security contractors contact the PCO directly or do they contact the PCO via, their CO? PSCs typically do not have COs, they have country managers or project managers. Normally, who conducts Page 6 Record of Interview relations between PSCs and the PCO and ROC is determined by what needs to be discussed and who within the PSC is most appropriate to do so. (** ANALYST NOTE: __________ indicated that there were no set procedures for contacting the PCO and contractors can contact the PCO directly.) 7. How does the PCO handle emergency situations? It notifies appropriate MNFI authorities. Can the PCO dispatch quick response teams? NO, there are no QRFs assigned to the PCO, they are to the military. (** ANALYST NOTE: In addition to the PCO, there is also a tactical operation center at the American Embassy in Baghdad. The PCO does not send out quick response teams; the PCO is merely the platform for communication.) 8. Does the PCO have any arrangements with Multinational Forces Iraq and military units throughout Iraq to request quick reaction forces and emergency medical and medical evacuation support to private security contractors that come under attack and to deconflict/facilitate movement of private security details and convoys with military unit movements? On a not-to-interfere basis and as forces are available, MNFI has agreed to respond. (** ANALYST NOTE: The PCO has responded to every situation of which they were informed.) 9. Do these arrangements differ depending on who lets the contract? Are contractors working for the PCO given priority over non-PCO contractors and subcontractors? Which particular contract the PSC is supporting at time of difficulty is not part of the decision matrix. 10. Does the PCO interact with __________ s Security Management Center? Not directly. (** ANALYST NOTE: __________ indicated that __________ scope had a very limited scope supporting DOS. In addition, __________ ed that many of the PSCs have their own operation centers. The PSCs have tried to cobble together the intelligence centers from the various PSCs, but have run into problems with funding. PSCs have different budgets for their spending on intelligence gathering and, thus, it would be difficult to determine an appropriate fee for participating in a PSC-administered communication center. The PSCAI tried to address this gap and the PCO has further improved communications among PSCs.) 11. How do contractors and military units convey their location to the PCO? Contractors through beacon (transponder) system. Military does not. How do contractors contact the PCO while in movement? Sat phone or via beacon. (** ANALYST NOTE: The LMCC maintains display software that allows the military to see all PCO participating contractor movements.) Page 7 Record of Interview 12. To what extent is the PCO’s communications equipment interoperable with military communications equipment? VERY Limited. PCO does not share military comms. Do have cell phones and land line numbers. (** ANALYST NOTE: __________ indicated that the PCO is currently using an MCI system that allows them to call out of theatre location from a remote line in the United States. The absence of shared VHF is a major concern for __________ also added that the military is reluctant to give contractors the full range of communications due to security concerns.) 13. Can the communication system between PSCs and the PCO’s ROC be improved? How so? Yes. Common equipment. Costs many $$ (**ANALYST NOTE: __________ sked __________ which kinds of communication systems we would need to improve communications in Iraq. __________ ndicated that Thuraya phone systems, HF comms and VHF comms would improve communication. __________ ndicated that the use of Regional ROC’s also helps to improve communication because RROC’s can communicate directly with each other when persons traveling in their AOR are unable to communicate.) 14. Does the PCO’s ROC write after-action reports? The PSCs write the after action reports. In which types of situations have these reports been written? When contact occurs. Do private security contractors participating in the PCO’s ROC movement coordination relay any after-action or after-incident reports? Yes. 15. Does the PCO’s ROC maintain a database of contractors working in Iraq? No. If so, how does the PCO collect this information on contractors? Which contractors are included in the database? Are subcontractors and non-DOD contractors included in the database? If this data is not currently being collected by the PCO’s ROC, is any DOD organization collecting this information? Are there plans to implement the creation of a contractor database? The ROC does not have the manpower to establish and maintain a data base. Since every contractor coming into Iraq requires a CAC card (technically), I’ve asked one of staff to use this as a start point. I believe this is a function of IRMO and not the ROC, at least as we are currently configured. Bottom line, this is currently not being performed but we are working on establishing a start point. (** ANALYST NOTE: __________ ndicated that the PCO does keep list of contractors on an ad hoc basis. The ROC does not have the manpower to maintain a working database of contractors. The PCO has used CAC card applications as a way to gauge the number of contractors working in Iraq. __________ ieves that the maintenance of a database of contractors should be an IRMO responsibility. __________ndicated that until July 2004, there was not even an automated database of contracts in Iraq. The PCO is still trying to get a list of Iraqi contracts and authorized dates of service. There are a number of reasons that a database would be helpful, including knowledge of the constant movement of contractors, personnel recovery issues. Without a database of contractors, it would be difficult to gauge the “damage done when contractors fall into the wrong hands.”) Page 8 Record of Interview 16. Does the PCO track casualties or incidents involving private security contractors or contractors? I don’t think so. Does the PCO track casualties or incidents involving the military? No. ( ** ANALYST NOTE: The GRD does maintain metrics on those incidents (KIA’s and WIA’s) that affect their ability to meet delivery and destination goals.) 17. We have heard from several contractors that there is concern that __________ [Aegis] not sufficiently fulfilling their contract and that they are wary of sharing information with a peer. Many contractors believe that communication function performed under the___________ contract is an innately governmental position and should be performed by a DOD entity. Because of these concerns, several contractors have stated that they will utilize the PCO’s resources but do not place much faith in the program? Engaging in firefights with terrorists is also an innately governmental position, but unless the government chooses to provide manpower far above current levels, we must rely on contractors to provide shooters, communicators and other experts fulfilling critical roles. “As for not sufficiently fulfilling their contract”, it’s true that __________ got off to a rocky start last summer __________ __________ __________ __________ __________ __________ __________ __________ __________ heir performance has improved markedly and they were recently provided by the Contracting Officer with a (nonbinding) notice of intent to exercise its option. Some of these rumors can be attributed to a lingering perception from these early days of the contract. Others may be based in the competitive reluctance of other PSCs to deal with __________ fear of losing a client to __________ Has the PCO heard these rumors and what steps have been taken to address these concerns? We’ve heard them, although in diminishing intensity over the past several weeks. PCO and the ROC operate in a transparent fashion which should alleviate such concerns. We oversee __________ performance on a continual basis. We will seek continued process improvement. Weapons 1. What type of weapons do __________ ersonnel use while protecting PCO personnel? M4, NIPS and AK 47 rifles, Glock 17 and 19 and CZ 75 pistols and Minimi as team weapon. 2. The Draft Interagency Memorandum indicates that the PCO would be responsible for maintaining a list of weapons and ammunition that are approved by the USG for issuance. Does the PCO o__________ ently maintain this list? __________ not responsible for maintaining the list. The weapon procurement was approved by COR, PCO and DOS. That list has been superseded by a law signed by Ambassador Bremer just prior to his departure which authorizes PSCs to carry military-level weapons. 3. Under Memorandum 17, Iraq’s Ministry of Interior (MO!) is supposed to issue weapons cards. Is the MOI administering Weapons Cards? Yes, to registered PSCs. Page 9 Record of Interview If not, why not and who is administering these cards? If MoI does not do it, it isn’t done. 4. Have you heard of any contractors that have encountered difficulties in obtaining weapons? YES. ( ** ANALYST NOTE: __________ __________ __________ __________ __________ __________ __________ __________ __________ __________ __________ ____________________ __________ __________ __________ __________ __________ __________ __________ __________ __________ __________ __________ __________ __________ __________ __________ __________ __________ __________ __________ __________ __________ __________ __________ __________ __________ __________ __________ __________ __________ __________ __________ __________ __________ __________ __________ __________ __________ __________ __________ __________ __________ __________ __________ __________ __________ Chain of Command 1. What authority does the PCO’s ROC have over private security contractors? No authority, but collegial suggestions. 2. What authority does the combatant commander have over __________ employees? Coalition military runs Iraq security, what MNF1 says, goes. Contracting Issues I. Does the PCO have any lessons learned with regard to contracting for security providers and/or security related equipment, such as armored vehicles, body armor, and communication devices? What actions are you taking to incorporate these lessons in new procurements? Similarly, what approach are you taking to share or disseminate your solutions to other agencies or departments? Because of the nature of __________ costs-plus contract, PCO Security reviews all requests for purchase of equipment. It may accept, reject, modify or send such requests back to __________ or further information. The Contracting Officer then reviews and decides whether to authorize purchase by __________ As to lessons learned by __________ ey state as follows: __________ Training Wing includes our operational research function. It collates feedback from our own Page 10 Record of Interview organization, selected other companies and special operations units where possible. This is then factored in to our reviews of: Training, SOPS and Equipment Procurement. Our external feedback goes routinely to the RSO and PCO and specifically (e.g. in the case of our vehicle escort policy note) to Dir PCO and widely within and without the organization.” 2. From your perspective, does the PCO have sufficient visibility over security providers and security related costs? What management controls or tools are in place that assists you in these areas? Does the PCO have new initiatives or plans that would improve control or visibility over security providers and security-related costs? See our response to Contracting Issues Question One, above. 3. The __________ ntract indicates that the military is responsible for threats above Level I. Who determines the threat level and is there a set chain of command for events entailing threat levels above level I? The military generally determines the threat level. However, the Embassy also determines threat response for COM personnel and may, for example, bar PCO personnel from traveling certain routes even when, as with Route Irish, MNFI has said it’s okay. PCO must answer to both chains of command. Does __________ ve a military contact for times of immediate need or are all requests for military assistance sent through the Contracting Officer? Requests for military assistance are sent either through the ROCs/RROCs or the Security Directorate, not the Contracting Officer. 4. The original contract with __________ equired that the contractor comply with DOD regulations, directives, instructions, general orders, policies, procedures and in particular Army Regulation 715-9 and Field Manual 3-100.21. Did the PCO provide __________ ith a comprehensive list of guiding documents and, if so, what are these documents? No. 5. Can we have contact information for __________ Yes. Please contact its ______________________________________________________________________

Read the full article →

David Isenberg: The GAO Transcripts, Part 12: Can’t We All Just Coordinate?

July 11, 2010

This is the twelfth installment of the Government Accountability Office interview transcripts that were prepared pursuant to the July 2005 GAO report ” Rebuilding Iraq: Actions Needed To Improve Use of Private Security Providers .” This interview with a U.S. military officer who served in Iraq indicates that in his experience interactions with private security contractors was both good and bad. Generally, it was mostly good but the bad could be royal pains in the butt. The officer notes that most private security contractors act professionally. Some, however, were not, and by some, I mean more than a “few bad apples” as trade associations like to say. An example of the latter is this: This being said, there are still an enormous amount of contract act security that roam the Green Zone with seemingly limited adult supervision. This group creates an image of a pseudo mercenary army in the green zone. Soldiers have little regard for them bordering on contempt for their lack of standards and discipline. Another example is this: Standards of conduct that apply to all contractors that clearly define lines of communication and authority. Specifically, we continually had problems with contractors carrying loaded weapons on secure military compounds and in our dining facilities. If the contractor is actively engaged as a body guard for a VIP, this is no problem. Other than that they should not carry loaded weapons on US compounds. We strictly enforced this standard and escorted many contractors off our installation that refused to comply. Of course, this was years ago, when U.S. forces had been in Iraq just over two years. Still, that is a long time by military standards. And yet there were still significant issues that were bedeviling the military contractor relationship, such as non-interoperable communications or unresolved command and control relationships. As there were no procedures in place as to when military commanders should help contractors if they got into trouble decisions were made on an ad hoc basis. Things are doubtlessly improved now but it does not reflect well on either the military or contractors that it took so long for things to get worked out. Standard disclaimer: I have put in ( _____ ) to reflect those words of phrases which have been blacked out in the transcript. I have also put in the underlining as it appeared in the original transcript. As in the transcript, I have left out letters from various words, even when it seems obvious what the word is. Prepared by Carole Coffey Index: Date Prepared: April 27, 2005 DOC Number: 130798 Reviewed bye Steve Sternlieb DOC Library: Goal 1 Job Code: 350544 Record of Interview Title Interview with representatives Purpose Obtain info on pre-deployment training Contact Method phone Contact Place N/A Contact Date April 26, 2005 Participants Carole Coffey, GAO 202-512-5876 ______________________________ _______________ _______________ _______________ Comments/Remarks: I contacted _______________ determine if the Iraq pre-deployment training included a segment on private security contractors in Iraq. I contacted the _______________ because we had been told that they were going to be rotating back to Iraq. _______________ made the following comments I. The division has not been notified as to whether or not it will be returning to Iraq. While the division still has some folks in Iraq, those that deployed for the Jan 30 election return in the late March time frame and are on block leave. The Division headquarters deployed to Iraq in mid-2003 and return to _______________ in the fall of 2004. Prior to leaving in 2003 they received no guidance or training regarding PSCs. 2. The division always has a brigade ready to deploy with hours. According to the Major, there this brigade has not received any training on working with PSCs or the PCO or ROC. 3. According to _______________, who served as a battle captain for one of the division’s brigades, his unit did not know that there were PSCs in the battle space until the PSCs began to contact them for assistance He described the coordination between the PSCs and his unit as non-existent. 4. The Captain thought that coordination should work through MNF-I as it did for the Iraqi Survey Group. The Command would issue a frago and the unit would provide assistance for the survey group as directed by in the frago. 5. _______________ that it would be helpful to have more information about who was in the batttlespace and the Captain said that the PSCs needed to let the military know when they would be in their area and give the units as much notice as possible. 6. The division has talked about the complex battlefield in terms of NGOs and coalition forces but they have not discussed PSCs, specifically. Page 1 Record of Interview Questions Regarding Private Security Contractors Command and Control f Private Security Contractors Our current understanding is that the military services directly contract for security of military facilities, that some DOD contractors may contract for security for their personnel, and that civilian government agencies and their prime contractors contract for security in Iraq and possibly elsewhere. While it is our understanding that _______________ not contract for security of military facilities in Iraq, we also understand that the MOM may have come in contact with private security contractors frequently while in Iraq. That is the context for the following questions. Background: I served as the Operation Officer for the _______________ _______________ _______________ , the Squadron’s mission was to provide security escort to the Coalition Provisional Authority in Baghdad Iraq. The Squadron conducted over 5500 escort missions for CPA. Numerous missions involved interaction with _______________ security personnel o _______________ security personnel. From APR 04 to JUL 04 the Squadron conducted operations in Ad Diwaniya, Iraq. While in Ad Diwaniya the Squadron occupied Camp Wolfpack (formerly camp Foxtrot). This camp was occupied by the Squadron as well as a small contingent of CPA employees with their assigned security contractors from _______________ security. I currently serve as Regimental X0. I. What guidance did CENCTOM or CJTF-7 issue for dealing with the private security contractors? Did the guidance differentiate between contractors providing security for U.S. government agencies and those providing security for contractors? Did the _______________ velop any policies or guidance? If any policies or guidance were provided or developed please provide us with a copy. I do not recall any guidance from CETCOM or CITE-7 for dealing with security contractors. The Regiment did not publish any specific guidance in dealing with contractors. At the Squadron level we coordinated our activities with the security contractors to ensure the safety and security requirements of our operations were met. 2. What is the command and control relationship between military commanders and subcontractors that provide security to DOD contractors? What authority do the military chains of command have over private security contractor personnel and how is that authority exercised? I am not aware of any formal C2 relationship between security contractors. The Squadron Commander executed his command authority over his area of responsibility. Policies and standards for operations and conduct were published for our soldiers and were expected to be adhered to by contractors operating in our battle space. The X0 or I met with contractors daily to discuss operations. We all had a common understanding of our mission and worked together to achieve success. If there was a problem, it was addressed to the appropriate level of supervision at the CPA headquarters or in Diwaniya with the CPA Chief. Ultimately, the military commander retained authority for all operations. If security contractors wanted to conduct missions that would compromise security or endanger lives, the Commander would strongly advise against it or flat out cancel it. Military Commanders had no disciplinary oversight over contractors. 3. What is the command and control relationship between military commanders and firms that are contracted by the U.S. Government to provide security for State Department, USAID, or other government personnel and facilities in Iraq? What authority do the military chains of command have over private security contractor personnel and how is that authority exercised? Again, I am not sure of the official C2 relationship that existed between contractors and the military. Commanders do not have authority over contractors, but do establish credible relationships based on experience and a common mission. The vast majority of the contractors I dealt with were extremely professional and had a great deal of military experience. 95% of the time we worked together there were no issues. In most instances of this relationship, we provided additional security (outer and inner cordon) for high profile officials. When refining plans and operations to protect these people, the Squadron was ultimately responsible for the security of the VIP. Contractors provided the inner cordon of security and coordinated routes and activities of the VIP. 4. What is the command and control relationship between military commanders and the private security contractors who are providing security to contractors who have been awarded contracts by US government civilian agencies to rebuild Iraq? What authority do the military chains of command have over private security contractors and their personnel and how is that authority exercised? We did not deal with these security firms. Interaction Between Private Security Contractors and US and Coalition Military Forces I. Can private security contractor personnel call on U.S. military commanders for support in case of trouble? What procedures are currently in place for private security contractors to call upon military commanders for help? I do not know the legal answer to this question. I know that anyone in the battle space we controlled that was in trouble got the help they needed. On numerous occasions we provided support to CPA contractors who were in trouble. We had established relationships with these organizations that knew how to contact us at our operations center by cell phone or by coming to the TOC. Ultimately, the Commander made the decision to provide any assistance. 2. What responsibility, if any, do military commanders have to defend, rescue, or search for missing private security contractor personnel, if they are (a) United States citizens or (b) foreign nationals? I believe Commanders have the responsibility to safeguard personnel who are engaged in the business of building a safe and secure environment in Iraq. On several occasions we went to the assistance of contractors, both military and others, who were in imminent danger from a hostile threat in our battle space. 3. What efforts have been made to promote interoperability between private security contractors and U.S. and coalition military forces? I do not know of any besides fostering a professional relationship based on the common goal of providing security for contractors and then CPA personnel in Iraq. 4. What interoperability exists between the communications equipment of military units and private security contractors? If there is no interoperability or the extent of interoperability is unknown, what plans, if any, are there to establish or improve interoperability? There was no commonality in communications between military and private contract services. Even among different contractors there were different communication systems. The only common link was by cell phone. Our Squadron never had the assets to loan such systems to contract security personnel. Doing so may also compromise the security of US forces. When we had to work together or needed a shared communication network, the contractor would loan us some of their radios. 5. What mechanisms are there for intelligence sharing between private security contractors and United States or coalition troops? We would share limited intelligence with private contract services. Most of the information we provided pertained to route security, recent attacks, emerging tactics, techniques and procedures the enemy was using and the current enemy situation in our battle spaces. Information concerning targeting of insurgents and information concerning operations we were conducting was not shared. The contractors provided us another source of information with their internal contacts on numerous occasions that helped in developing our targeting. 6. To what extent do, private security contractors share their intelligence information with United States and coalition troops? Again, established a very professional relationship based on mutual trust and a common mission. They knew we gave them as much information as possible to conduct their operations to fulfill the mission to protect their primaries. They also understood that we could not divulge all information based on operations security. In turn they were very fourth coming in providing information to us on their experiences and what they had seen. This was especially true in Ad Diwaniya, and with _______________ curity personnel in Baghdad. 7. What procedures are in place between military commanders and private security contractors for coordination of movement of contractor personnel through U.S. and coalition military sectors in Iraq? Contractors that worked in our battle space coordinated all of their moves through our operation center. Other contractors traveling in or through our space did not coordinate. While in Baghdad, the Squadron coordinated all of its movement through other units battle at least 24 hours prior to moving through that area. I do not believe contractors have that capability based on their communication equipment compatibility to coordinate their movement with the military unless they coordinate through JTF-7. 8. What procedures are in place for movement of private security contractor personnel through military checkpoints? Contract security had to adhere to the same procedures as any other civilian agency coming onto our compound in Ad Diwaniya unless special arrangements were made. Special arrangements were made when the contractors were escorting high level VIPs. Coordination measures included visual signals, cell phone calls and convoy descriptions and composition. These convoys moved through our checkpoints unhindered to prevent them from stopping in a possible vulnerable area susceptible to attack. Contractor access was an issue in the green Zone in Baghdad. 2d BDE, 1 AD had numerous issues with contractors escorting CPA and Iraqi Government personnel entering the Green Zone. It was a constant challenge for the 2d BDE force protection officer to enforce entry standards with contractor personnel. 9. What impact (if any) did having private security contractors in Iraq have on the ability of the ______________ I can only speak in terms of the Squadron I worked with and the battle space and missions we conducted. The contractors did have an impact, but most of it was from outside requirements generated at higher levels. The impact they had was the request for additional security support in moving VIPs or conducting missions during periods of heightened tension. On one occasion, when the Squadron was conducting operations in Najaf, the contractors escorted the CPA chief to the town of Afak without our knowledge. While in Afak, the party was surrounded by hostile forces while attending a meeting at the city government building. An aggressive fire fight ensured. The Squadron had to react rapidly to send a relief column to rescue the party. This event did have a significant impact on our operations. 10. What actions should be taken to improve the interaction between private security contractors and the military in Iraq? Standards of conduct that apply to all contractors that clearly define lines of communication and authority. Specifically, we continually had problems with contractors carrying loaded weapons on secure military compounds and in our dining facilities. If the contractor is actively engaged as a body guard for a VIP, this is no problem. Other than that they should not carry loaded weapons on US compounds. We strictly enforced this standard and escorted many contractors off our installation that refused to comply. Standards also need to be enforced to notify unit commanders of contractors operating in their battle space. Standardized communications would also be a great help. 11. Did the ______________ complete after action reports or incident reports on any of its interaction with private security companies? If so, please provide us with copies? We did not do an AAR concerning private security contractors. 12. Is SJA aware of any incidents of contractors violating U.S. or Iraq law (besides the prison incidents)? If yes, how were these dealt with? I am not aware of any violations. The contractors we dealt with had very limited if any contact with the Iraqi people. Final Comment. The contractors we dealt with were mainly from ______________and ______________ The vast majority that I dealt with were professional and worked with us very well. Any issues concerning standards and operations were addressed immediately to the leadership of these organizations and resulted in immediate rectification. There is an air of friction and contention in dealing with contractors. This is especially true in the Green Zone. The contractors that worked with ______________ Baghdad and the team in Diwaniya were very professional and assisted us greatly. The security team ______________ (all senior prior service special operation forces soldiers) even provided the troopers of my Squadron training in urban movement techniques, VIP escort techniques, small arms engagement techniques and defensive driving. This being said, there are still an enormous amount of contract act security that roam the Green Zone with seemingly limited adult supervision. This group creates an image of a pseudo mercenary army in the green zone. Soldiers have little regard for them bordering on contempt for their lack of standards and discipline. The fact that these private security contractors earn 7 to 8 times the pay of the soldiers adds to this. Several soldiers were hired into lucrative contracts as private security contractors and left the Army for that occupation. Questions Regarding Private Security Contractors Command and Control of Private Security Contractors Our current understanding is that the military services directly contract for security of military facilities, that some DOD contractors may contract for security for their personnel, and that civilian government agencies and their prime contractors contract for security in Iraq and possibly elsewhere. While it is our understanding that the ______________ did not contract for security of military facilities in Iraq, we also understand that the ______________ may have come in contact with private security contractors frequently while in Iraq. That is the context for the following questions. Background: I served as the __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ responses will be from the perspective of my duty positions held and the time served while deployed in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom. 1. What guidance did CENCTOM or CJTTF-7 issue for dealing with the private security contractors? Did the guidance differentiate between contractors providing security for U.S. government agencies and those providing security for contractors? Did the ______________ velop any policies or guidance? If any policies or guidance were provided or developed please provide us with a copy. I am unaware of any formal, specific guidance provided by CENTCOM or CJT-7. We developed internal, informal procedures as the situations arose . These policies continued to be refined over time as the situation continued to develop. 2. What is the command and control relationship between military commanders and subcontractors that provide security to DOD contractors? What authority do the military chains of command have over private security contractor personnel and how is that authority exercised? I am unaware of any formal command and control relationship that existed between contractors and military commanders. It was the general understanding that the military commander maintained complete and final authority of his battle space to include any persons operating within that area. 3. What is the command and control relationship between military commanders and firms that are contracted by the U.S. Government to provide security for State Department, USAID, or other government personnel and facilities in Iraq? What authority do the military chains of command have over private security contractor personnel and how is that authority exercised? I am unaware of any formal command and control relationship that was established between the military commanders and these organizations . Our specific cases were based on based on a professional relationship that took into account our responsibility towards the safety and security for all individuals within our battle space and the contractors recognized need for support due to their limited resources . We never encountered a situation that could not be resolved through discussion and prior coordination so the need to involve a higher headquarters to arbitrate a disagreement never arose. 4. What is the command and control relationship between military commanders and the private security contractors who are providing security to contractors who have been awarded contracts by US government civilian agencies to rebuild Iraq? What authority do the military chains of command have over private security contractors and their personnel and how is that authority exercised? I am unaware of a specific command and control relationship between military commanders and the private security contractors. Again, professional courtesy and open communications were the key to facilitate both military operations and the mission of these contractors. It was our “general understanding” that we held authority over these individuals since they operated within our battle space although we never had to exercise this authority. Interaction Between Private Security Contractors and US and Coalition Military Forces 1. Can private security contractor personnel call on U.S. military commanders for support in case of trouble? What procedures are currently in place for private security contractors to call upon military commanders for help? It was our common understanding that we would provide assistance to any individual or groupthat required it in order to maintain security and stability within our area of operations. Numerous times, security personnel would conduct coordination with our unit in order to synchronize their movements and activities . The majority of this coordination was conducted in person due to the lack of communication interoperability. 2. What responsibility, if any, do military commanders have to defend, rescue, or search for missing private security contractor personnel, if they are (a) United States citizens or (b) foreign nationals? As the military authority within our area of operations, our commander considered it his responsibility to provide assistance to any individual or group (whether U.S. citizen or foreign national) within his battle space that required it. 3. What efforts have been made to promote interoperability between private security contractors and U.S. and coalition military forces? Cellular phones were the only common communications means that were available to communicate with private security contractors. These systems were unreliable and were extremely limited in availability . Often, liaisons were posted in close proximity to our operations center in order to facilitate coordination. What interoperability exists between the communications equipment of military units and private security contractors? If there is no interoperability or the extent of interoperability is unknown, what plans, if any, are there to establish or improve interoperability? Cellular phones were the only communication assets that were available to communicate and significant distance with private security contractors. If operating in close proximity on occasions we provided “Talk-About” style radios to contractors to be able to communicate. 5. What mechanisms are there for intelligence sharing between private security contractors and United States or coalition troops? Limited intelligence was shared with private security contractors and the type and amount of intelligence was strictly controlled by the commander. The majority of information pertained to recent enemy contact, route status, and local points of contact. 6. To what extent do private security contractors share their intelligence information with United States and coalition troops? On multiple occasions, security contractors would share information with our operations center. This information was mainly anecdotal in nature and would be cross-checked with current on-hand intelligence. 7. What procedures are in place between military commanders and private security contractors for coordination of movement of contractor personnel through U.S. and coalition military sectors in Iraq? I am unaware of any specific procedures that were in effect to coordinate the movement of contractors within our battle space. Over time; contractors realized that it was in their best interest to contact the local military authority and conduct coordination before beginning movement 8. What procedures are in place for movement of private security contractor personnel through military checkpoints? Contractors were required to adhere to all standard operating procedures while passing through our checkpoints unless prior coordination was conducted. 9. What impact (if any) did having private security contractors in Iraq have on the ability of ______________ to perform its mission? On numerous occasions, short notice plans would be developed in order to support a security contractor’s mission within our battle space. This resulted in less than complete instructions being relayed to the troops potentially supporting these contractors and reduce the time available to them to prepare for any contingency missions. 10. What actions should be taken to improve the interaction between private security contractors and the military in Iraq? In my opinion, a central coordination cell should be formed that provides a means of coordinating between various private contractors. These cells should be established at the headquarters of each brigade sized element in order to facilitate the timely sharing of information. 11. Did the ______________ complete after action reports or incident reports on any of its interaction with private security companies? If so please provide us with copies? No AARs or reports were developed concerning these matters by our unit 12. Is SJA aware of any incidents of contractors violating U.S. or Iraq law (besides the prison incidents)? If yes, how were these dealt with? I am unaware of any such incidents occurring within our area of operations.

Read the full article →

David Isenberg: Inherent or Non-Inherent: That is the Question

July 6, 2010

I was out of town when the federal Commission on Wartime Contracting in Iraq and Afghanistan (CWC) held the first part of a two-day hearing on the proper role and oversight of security contractors supporting U.S. operations in Southwest Asia. The first day was devoted to the subject ” Are Private Security Contractors Performing Inherently Governmental Functions? .” Those who follow the industry know that is one of the classic old time questions the industry gets. To put it in pop culture terms it is a golden oldie. As I was not there I am just going to excerpt some portions that seem particularly relevant to me. But before we do that let’s just focus on some facts that came out of the hearing, such as the federal government relying on more than 40,000 private security contractors (PSCs) to support U.S. operations in Southwest Asia. They provide armed security for convoys, diplomatic and other personnel, and military bases and other facilities in Iraq and Afghanistan. During the first quarter of 2010, the Department of Defense had roughly 14,000 PSC personnel working under contract in Iraq. That number is nearly equal to the personnel strength of a World War II American infantry division. The six-witness panel — comprising of two think-tank officials, two academics, an industry-association official, and a consultant specializing in government acquisition issues — examined the current system which governs PSCs and debated the appropriate line when a task must be solely performed by United States military or civilian employees. The witnesses were Dr. Al Burman, president, Jefferson Solutions; Dr. Allison Stanger, professor and director of the Rohatyn Center for International Affairs, Middlebury College; Stan Soloway, president and CEO, Professional Services Council; Danielle Brian, executive director, Project on Government Oversight; Dr. Deborah Avant, professor of political science and international studies, and director of the Center for Research on International and Global Studies, University of California, Irvine; and Dr. John Nagl, president, Center for a New American Security. In the clear as mud, let’s think about what “inherently governmental” is, beginning in their joint opening statement CWC Co-Chairs Christopher Shays and Michael Thibault said: The question here is whether they are performing inherently governmental functions that should not be contracted out in whole or in part, no matter what the demand or workload. The answer to that question involves a mixture of law, policy, and prudence. The Federal Activities Inventory Reform Act of 1998 (the “FAIR Act”) defines an inherently governmental function as one “”so intimately related to the public interest as to require performance by a federal government employee.” The language in the FAIR Act closely parallels the Office of Management and Budget’s Circular A-76, issued in 1966. The OMB definition uses “mandate” rather than “require,” and “personnel” rather than “employee.” The principle laid down in the law and the OMB policy is nonetheless vague and open to subjective judgment. The 110th Congress addressed this problem by requiring OMB to develop a “single consistent definition” of inherently governmental function. The Bureau’s Office of Federal Procurement Policy (OFPP) has taken comments on a policy letter to make that definition, and is expected to publish a final version by October this year. The Office of Federal Procurement Policy draft released in March takes the FAIR Act definition as a starting point. It also proposes asking whether a function involves direct exercise of sovereign power, or whether contractor discretion could commit the government to a course of action. The OFPP also discusses functions that are “closely associated” with or “critical” for the success of governmental functions. The results of this filtering would determine whether a function must be performed by federal personnel, may be performed by contractors only under close government control, or may be routinely performed by contractors. The Commission’s interest in this policy evolution stems from its authorizing legislation. Congress instructed us to include in our final report recommendations for improving “the process for determining which functions are inherently governmental and which functions are appropriate for performance by contractors in a contingency operation (including during combat operations), especially whether providing security in an area of combat operations is inherently governmental.” This is a challenging, three-layer mandate. We are not simply looking at the general process for determining inherently governmental functions, but also at that process as applied to “contingency operations” that may include combat, and then at PSC use in areas of combat operations. Our assignment takes us into fine distinctions. Hiring private guards for a U.S. supply depot may be entirely routine and uncontroversial in a stable, allied country. Is it still prudent during a contingency response to an insurgency, natural disaster, or terrorist attack, when command, control, and assured response are high-value attributes? Is it still prudent if the contingency makes it likely that the guards will be exposed to attack, and may be likely to use force, with all the diplomatic and public-opinion consequences that follow? These questions are not abstract or academic. They involve real people who spill real blood. Whether they should be placed in life-or-death decision roles in foreign combat zones, and under what circumstances, is a serious question. From Allison Stanger: As I have argued elsewhere, it makes good sense for the government to harness the energy, efficiency, and bottom-up creativity of the private sector in as many ways as possible–up to the point where market imperatives begin to undermine the public interest. We have reached such a tipping point in Iraq and Afghanistan. As many witnesses before me have testified, Iraq and Afghanistan are our first two contractors’ wars. Even at the height of the Vietnam War, contractors comprised just 14% of the American presence on the ground in Southeast Asia. Today, contractors outnumber uniformed personnel on the ground in both Iraq and Afghanistan, and in the simplest of terms, armed security contractors enable us to wage two wars simultaneously while avoiding the necessity of a draft. Are armed security contractors currently performing inherently governmental functions in these conflict zones? While there is a general consensus that there are activities so intrinsic to the nature of government that they should not be contracted out, there is little agreement on what those activities are. Both OMB and Congress have repeatedly focused attention on the topic of inherently governmental functions, but to date have refrained from providing specific guidelines as to what particular activities must never be outsourced. Restricting the focus to those contractors able to deploy lethal force makes it easier to render a judgment. A leading advocate of minimal government, Milton Friedman, maintained, “The basic functions of government are to defend the nation against foreign enemies, to prevent coercion of some individuals by others within the country, to provide a means of deciding on our rules, and to adjudicate disputes.” Using Friedman’s minimalist definition, the use of contractors in the realms of security and justice demand the strictest scrutiny. Even under this leanest of definitions, moving security contractors are performing inherently governmental functions, since they are actively involved in defending the nation against foreign enemies. Later on in her statement Stanger gives this summary of the problems she sees with using PSCs. Lest I be misunderstood, I must emphasize that the current use of armed security contractors is wholly well-intentioned, a matter of necessity rather than choice. The State Department and Department of Defense continue to utilize them, despite all the negative press, because an all-volunteer force leaves us severely understaffed for meeting US objectives in Iraq and Afghanistan simultaneously. State and DOD should therefore not be blamed for their reliance on armed contractors; with an all-volunteer force and an under-resourced civilian capability, they are doing the best job with the resources currently available of delivering what Congress and the President have explicitly and implicitly asked them to do. But understanding how we arrived at our present predicament renders our current practices neither desirable nor sustainable. Our short-sighted and growing reliance on armed contractors in Iraq and Afghanistan compromises long term US interests in at least six different ways. First, the practice blurs the line between the legitimate and illegitimate use of force, which is just what our enemies want. Al Qaeda’s operatives have no country and are private actors waging war on the United States. Terrorists may receive funding from states, but they are by definition non-state actors. If the United States can legitimately rely on non-state actors wielding weapons to protect our interests, why can’t Al Qaeda or the Taliban, especially when contractor misdeeds appear to go completely unpunished? Second, our dependence on armed contractors in war zones is wholly at odds with our stated intention to build state capacity in Iraq and Afghanistan, so that the Afghan and Iraqi governments might one day be capable of independently providing security for their own citizens. The argument that security provided by the state is preferable to that provided by a collection of warlords is difficult to maintain when the United States itself lacks the capacity to wage war without reliance on private militias. The Afghan First strategy aims to hire local nationals to provide private security, and it has been wildly successful; at least 90% of private security contractors in Afghanistan today are Afghans. But in empowering these local privateers, we are in turn empowering regional warlords–precisely the opposite of building up Afghanistan’s capacity to secure its own territory without massive infusions of US taxpayer money. Since guns for hire never pledge enduring allegiance to a particular country, our rented allies today may very well become our enemies tomorrow. The local militias whose creation we have encouraged will also be a destabilizing future presence for the security of the AfPak region. Third, the extensive use of privateers overseas has had disastrous consequences for government accountability and transparency. The Commission is well acquainted with the enormous waste, fraud, and abuse that have resulted when US taxpayer money must change hands multiple times in a war zone. Further, local security contractors in Afghanistan are hired through sub-contracts, and information on sub-contracts is currently entirely unavailable to the public. The site on USAspending.gov, President Obama’s “Google for Government,” was supposed to go live over a year ago, but it remains “under construction.” Thus, we are effectively pouring taxpayer money into a black hole in Afghanistan, with no real means of knowing how well that money is likely to be spent or even who is receiving it. Fourth, the United States has no interest in seeing Afghans or Iraqis imitate our practices, let alone other foreign governments. The market for force is currently dominated by US and UK firms who often hire third party or local nationals, or sub-contract to local firms. But if it’s profitable, why shouldn’t other countries want in the game? Medieval Europe featured extensive use of local armies and mercenaries for security, but it was hardly the most desirable set of arrangements for liberty, equality, and prosperity. Medieval Europe on a global scale would not be a world order that served American interests or values. Fifth, our dependence on armed contractors ultimately undercuts troop morale by sending mixed signals to our citizens in uniform, who often perform the same jobs for a fraction of the pay. Government’s embrace of armed contractors in war zones erodes the virtue of fighting for one’s country, undermining the important value of disinterested public service. It also doesn’t help that the burden of sacrifice is currently unfairly distributed and hence undemocratic. How many US households earning in excess of $250,000 a year have a son or daughter in uniform? What does it say about American values, when we actively uphold a system in which a privateer can make double or triple the money selling his labor to the highest bidder? Finally, and perhaps most importantly, our dependence on armed security contractors has fueled an overly ambitious international agenda. Without privateers, we would need a draft to wage war in Iraq and Afghanistan, which would transform the politics of both conflicts. Avoiding a draft might sound like a plus, but surely war should ultimately be a matter of national sacrifice and honor, not profits and consumption. We degrade ourselves and strengthen our enemies by treating lethal force as something to be casually bought and sold. From Stan Soloway: We must also remember that the unprecedented presence of private security personnel in Iraq and Afghanistan was not the result of any political ideology or policy. Rather, it is the direct result of the nature of the missions being performed, the situational environment, and the human capital assets available and needed to execute those missions. The Iraq and Afghanistan missions are unprecedented by any measure. Even today, the U.S. Government is simultaneously executing three missions: (1) active warfare and peacemaking; (2) physical reconstruction; and (3) economic and other development. Historically, those missions have been approached sequentially; in the Iraq theater of operations, the leadership made the decision to move quickly and aggressively with the reconstruction and development missions even before security reached the levels normally achieved prior to launching those latter two missions. Right or wrong, that decision immediately created the largest private security requirement demand we have ever seen. There was, and today still is, no realistic way for the U.S. or coalition forces to provide the necessary levels of force protection for the thousands of projects and tens of thousands of American, Iraqi, and third country personnel performing the reconstruction and development missions. In fact, the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) explicitly provides that contractors performing contracts outside the U.S. other than in direct support of the U.S. military are required to provide their own security. Moreover, and equally importantly, particularly in the international development community, there has long been deep concern about the implications of having active duty military provide security during development program execution. As such, around the world, U.S. government-funded development projects and programs–whether under contract, grant or other financial arrangement–provide their own security through contracts with experienced security firms rather than rely on the military. Therefore, while it is easy to assume that the enormous private security presence in the warzone resulted from some intentional policy of ―privatizing war,‖ in truth it resulted directly from the nature and scope of the multiple missions being undertaken. Whether that was the correct decision is for others to decide. But given that decision, it was and remains wholly impractical and impossible for the U.S. troops or coalition forces to meet the security demand. Private Security is NOT Per Se ―Inherently Governmental This leads me to address the principal question of this hearing–are security contractors performing inherently governmental functions? Since the term ―private security encompasses so many different functions, the simple answer is no. There is nothing inherently governmental about providing security, even in a warzone. The question comes down to the nature of the specific work being performed. To my knowledge, no private security personnel have been involved in offensive military operations–which would clearly only be appropriate for performance by U.S. military forces. However, at home and abroad, it is not at all uncommon to have armed security protecting governmental and non-governmental assets. By definition, if a security officer is armed, there is the recognition that he or she may at some point be required to use lethal force to respond to a threat and the FAR rules I mentioned earlier clearly address and provide for this potential. Thus, it would be inappropriate to define all such security work as inherently governmental. From Danielle Brian: As we have examined this question, it has become clear to POGO that the answer is yes, PSCs are performing inherently governmental functions. A number of jobs that are not necessarily inherently governmental in general become so when they are conducted in a combat zone. Any operations that are critical to the success of the U.S. government’s mission in a combat zone must be controlled by government personnel. In addition, in those areas that have not been brought under the rule of law, it is an inherently governmental function to provide security so that the government’s missions can be successful. Why does this matter? The use of private contractors for security in a combat zone poses unique risks. One is the inherent tension between the effective performance of a mission and the financial interests of the contractor. As the Center for a New American Security put it, “The very existence of private contractors inserts a profit motive onto the battlefield; their primary responsibility is not the national interest but rather fulfilling the terms of their contracts.” In fact, making a profit and serving the national interest are sometimes in direct conflict: while cutting costs is good for the bottom line, it can undermine security. We saw evidence of this phenomenon in the ArmorGroup North America contract where, for example, in order to save money the company hired Gurkhas who did not meet language proficiency contract requirements–and therefore could not adequately communicate with the English-speaking guards. Another problem is that the laws in place do not adequately hold accountable all contractors that violate rules and endanger security in combat zones, particularly contractors for the State Department and CIA. Private employers such as security firms cannot ensure a binding chain of command that provides adequate discipline. Last year at the U.S. Naval Academy 2009 McCain Conference, there was a seminar on “Ethics and Military Contractors: Examining the Public-Private Partnership” which looked at the question of whether security in a combat zone is an inherently governmental function. According to the Executive Summary of the conference, “contractors should not be deployed as security guards, sentries, or even prison guards within combat areas. [Armed Private Security Contractors] should be restricted to appropriate support functions and those geographic areas where the rule of law prevails. In irregular warfare…environments, where civilian cooperation is crucial, this restriction is both ethically and strategically necessary.” Even the National Association of Security Companies recently wrote to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), “Perhaps insourcing or much greater contractor scrutiny may be needed for security provided in combat and combat support roles and in situations where combat could evolve….” From Deborah Avant: The most fundamental way in which private security activities may encroach on what is inherently governmental is through the exercise of deadly force – widely presumed to be a fundamental function of governments and specifically mentioned in the 1998 FAIR Act definition, among others. All armed private security personnel could affect the lives of the persons around which they work. Whether or not this effect is likely to be significant depends on at least three risk factors. * First is the threat environment. A more permissive environment where private security contractors are likely to function to deter common criminals, such as when they are guarding an embassy in a settled country, is much less risky than when contractors function in an active insurgency like in Afghanistan. * Second is the particular job. Guarding a warehouse is less risky than convoy security or personal security details. Jobs that require moving from one place to another increase both contact with others and the potential for threat. * Third is the level of command and control over private security contractors. The reason why a government employee is preferable to a private contractor in carrying out tasks intimately related to the public interest is because federal employees, particularly members of the US military, operate under the clear control of the federal government and have well designed systems of accountability. Though control of private contractors is never as great as command and control over US forces, different regulations can yield more or less control. Also important for the level of control are the skills, training and background of the personnel who perform private security jobs. These risk factors also interact. Even static guards may come under attack (and use force) if they are guarding important material or situated in a dangerous area. Protecting a convoy is more likely to require the use of force when it travels through a dangerous stretch of road than when it is traveling through a settled area. Poor command and control and/or guards with little training exacerbate the risk posed by the threat environment and the particular job while stronger command and control and/or better training can, to some extent, mitigate these risks. Risk to US Mission/Policy Private security may also encroach on inherently governmental work if what contractors do or how they do it can undermine the functioning of the military and/or the overall policy or mission of the US government. Some jobs are simply more critical to the core function of the military (i.e., its ability to fight) than others. A convoy carrying fuel, weapons or other important supplies to a military unit in the field is more critical than protection of the contents of a particular warehouse. Reliable protection that accords access to supply in the field is critical because of its relationship to the ability of military units to fight. In a counterinsurgency environment, though, the way private security contractors carry out their jobs is also critical to the success of the overall mission. This is true for supply convoys, but particularly for personal security details that frequently operate in highly populated areas. If they deliver supplies or people safely but in a way that is disrespectful to or abusive of civilians, they may allow the US military or diplomatic team to function but at the same time undermine popular support for the US (or the host government) and thus frustrate the chances for ultimate success. There were countless complaints from both Iraqis and US military personnel about poor behavior on the part of personal security details in Iraq between 2004 and 2007. Military personnel complained specifically about how this behavior undermined the counterinsurgency effort. The Nisour Square incident in 2007 provided a dramatic example of this issue. Finally, there is the relationship between private security companies and other violent forces in the country – including the host government but also militia forces and even insurgents. Relationships between private security companies and forces that are (or become) parallel forces, in competition with government forces, have been a common phenomenon over the course of the post-Cold War era and have often undermined efforts to build effective governance. In Iraq there was much speculation about the relationship between personnel that worked for the Facilities Protection Force and various militias connected with the insurgency in 2004. In Afghanistan, the US has relied much more on indigenous personnel and companies for its security. There are allegations that some of these companies are paying off the Taliban to ensure safe passage for convoys. Using private security contractors in a way that provides a platform for funneling US dollars to those working against US goals poses a significant risk to the overall US mission in Afghanistan. The three risk factors listed above: threat environment, nature of the job, and degree of command and control still affect the degree to which using private security could matter. * Guarding a convoy carrying critical supplies to the field will always be more critical to the military’s ability to function than guarding a warehouse but guarding the same convoy through a pacified area poses less risk than guarding it through a more dangerous area. For example, KBR had a good record of delivering supply in the (relatively) permissive environment in the Balkans. At the beginning of the Iraq War, however, KBR had difficulties fielding the requisite personnel and these difficulties were specifically linked to an unexpectedly high level of danger. * The potential for alienating civilians in a counterinsurgency environment is lower for static guards than for convoy security and personal security details that move around. This is by virtue of the fact that static guards are simply less likely to encounter as many civilians. By this rationale, the risk of alienating civilians is greatest for personal security details that not only move around but also tend to operate in more populated areas. * More command and control can reduce the risk that private security will undermine policy. For instance, the reforms that followed the Nisour Square shootings in 2007 established a greater level of command and control, which reduced the incidence of private security contractor behavior that alienated civilians. It is important to note, however, that while ostensibly under the same US policy, some convoy and personal security details in Afghanistan have not shown the same level of improvement. This may be due to the different background and training of Afghan companies and personnel. In sum, all armed personnel working for the United States abroad potentially encroach upon critical, close to governmental or inherently governmental simply by virtue of their ability to use deadly force. Those performing tasks critical to the mission of the US military or US policy also have the potential to trespass upon governmental roles. Features of particular threat environments, particular jobs, and the level of control over private security contractors can elevate or lower the degree of risk. All of these features should be considered in determining whether a job is critical, close to governmental or inherently governmental. The more of these features that are present, the more likely the job is inherently governmental. Thus, when private security contractors are armed, perform tasks critical to the US mission, work in dangerous environments where the nature of the job increases the chance of interaction with private individuals, and operate under weak command and control, they are most likely to be in violation of the principles enshrined in the inherently governmental edict. And finally John Nagl, who makes a point which has long been near and dear to me, namely, contractor use is a direct reflection of American geopolitical choices. When our nation goes to war, contractors go with it. In both Iraq and Afghanistan today, there are more private contractors than U.S. troops on the ground. This state of affairs is likely to endure. Now, and for the foreseeable future, the United States will be unable to engage in conflicts or reconstruction and stabilization operations of any significant size without private contractors. Changes in business practices, the provision of government services and the character of modern conflict, together with limits on the size of the American military, diplomatic and development corps, are driving the size and scope of expeditionary contracting to unprecedented proportions. Absent a significant reduction in America’s international commitments and perceived global interests, the employment of private contractors in future American conflicts is here to stay. The system within which this contracting takes place, however, has not caught up with the new reality. Billions of taxpayer dollars committed to contracts in Iraq and Afghanistan have been implemented with little oversight. Contracting companies themselves crave clearer guidelines. The roles of contractors remain incompletely integrated into the conduct of American operations. And the legal framework within which contractors work remains cloudy. … There remains little consensus about which functions should be included under the “inherently governmental” rubric. This is perhaps most vividly demonstrated by Congress’ inability to deem a substantial list of activities that fall into this category and by its decision to pass the responsibility for defining the term to the executive branch. It is important to note the implications of deeming a particular activity within or outside those bounds. Should a given function be deemed inherently governmental, it then becomes illegal for the government to ever contract it out – even in extremis. On the other hand, simply deeming a task to be not inherently governmental, and one that agencies could therefore contract out, in no way suggests that it is automatically good policy to do so. For this reason, a better alternative is to focus on a “core competencies” approach. While Congress should deem inherently governmental any acts it can agree should never be outsourced under any circumstances, a core competencies approach would apply to all of those activities that do not fall under that rubric. It would focus on those functions the government should develop, maintain and enforce, rather than trying to enumerate a list of specific activities for which it is impermissible, under law and in any circumstance, to ever contract out. Thus, for example, the government could decide that interrogating enemy prisoners is a core competency that it wishes to maintain. As it ramps up its federal interrogation capacity, it would aim to avoid contracting out this function, but – and only in extremis – it would be permitted under law to hire private contractors to interrogate prisoners should the government workforce prove insufficient to carry out this vital task. By eschewing contracting in specific areas as a matter of policy, the federal government would leave the option legally open to afford itself the flexibility to employ contractors in times of crisis or other extreme circumstances. Moreover, the core competencies approach would give commanders and others in the field the access to surge capacity and swiftness often necessary in an unpredictable contingency environment, while moving the U. S. government away from dependence on certain forms of contractors as a more general principle. It would also hold the promise of cutting through continued debates about what does or does not constitute an “inherently governmental” activity and instead concentrate on what the government should be doing and how it will ensure its competency to do it.

Read the full article →

U.K. Scraps FSA in Biggest Bank Regulation Overhaul Since 1997

June 17, 2010

By Gonzalo Vina June 17 (Bloomberg) — Chancellor of the Exchequer George Osborne said he will abolish the Financial Services Authority and give most of its power to the Bank of England, undoing the regulatory system set up by Gordon Brown in 1997. In the most sweeping changes to financial regulation since then, the watchdog will be wound down and replaced by three bodies over the next two years, the chancellor said. A Prudential Regulatory Authority will be created as a subsidiary of the central bank. Osborne will also set up a Financial Policy Committee at the bank and establish a consumer protection and markets agency. Osborne, whose Conservative Party took power after the May 6 election, is delivering on a promise made almost a year ago to shake up the way the U.K.’s banks and markets are policed. He’s blamed the system established by former Labour Prime Minister Brown for failing to prevent a financial crisis that saddled taxpayers with liabilities of as much as 1.4 trillion pounds ($2.1 trillion) and plunged the economy into the worst recession since World War II. “At the heart of the crisis was a rapid and unsustainable increase in debt that our macroeconomic and regulatory system utterly failed to identify let alone prevent,” Osborne told bankers at his first Mansion House dinner in London’s financial district last night. Northern Rock Brown’s government had to nationalize Northern Rock Plc , the first U.K. casualty of the credit crunch, in February 2008. The lender nearly collapsed in 2007 after it had to seek emergency funding from the central bank and then suffered a run on its deposits. The government also had to take controlling stakes in Royal Bank of Scotland Group Plc and Lloyds Banking Group Plc . Osborne’s plan scraps Brown’s tripartite system of regulation — in which the central bank, FSA and Treasury shared responsibilities — and places most of the onus on Bank of England Governor Mervyn King . Legislation to replace the FSA will be in place by 2012, Osborne said. Angela Knight , the chief executive of the British Bankers’ Association, a lobby group, said she welcomed steps to make the system “clearer and more effective” and pledged to support the government during the transition. The FSA’s chief executive, Hector Sants , 54, will stay on at the authority while it is wound down and will take up new roles on the bodies that replace it, becoming a deputy governor of the central bank. ‘Macro Issues’ Executive power over financial supervision will go to the Financial Policy Committee at the central bank, which will operate in a similar way to its rate-setting monetary policy panel. The new committee “will have the tools and the responsibility to look across the economy at the macro issues that may threaten economic and financial stability and the tools to take effective action in response,” Osborne said. The committee will be chaired by King and will include Sants among its members. The panel’s work will be scrutinized by Parliament’s Treasury Committee, the chancellor said. The Prudential Regulatory Authority “will carry out the prudential regulation of financial firms, including banks, investment banks, building societies and insurance companies,” Osborne said. Sants will be its chief executive and King its chairman. Andrew Bailey, the head of the central bank unit that deals with failed banks, will be Sants’s deputy. ‘Authority, Knowledge’ “Only independent central banks have the broad macroeconomic understanding, the authority and the knowledge required to make the kind of macro-prudential judgments that are required now and in the future,” Osborne said. “They must also be responsible for day-to-day micro-prudential regulation as well.” The third pillar of Osborne’s regulatory overhaul will come with the creation of a Consumer Protection and Markets Authority. Osborne said the agency will regulate financial firms “providing services to consumers” and maintain the “integrity of the U.K.’s financial markets.” King told the Mansion House dinner that the new framework will assure the stability of the financial system. “A credible macro-prudential regime could help forestall both excessive exuberance and unnecessary caution,” King said. “By altering the pressure on the financial brakes according to circumstances, regulation, far from being an inflexible foe, would become a flexible friend.” FSA Chairman Adair Turner said he welcomed Osborne’s plans. ‘Much Clearer’ “The overall future shape of financial regulation is now much clearer and we are in a strong position to create a future regulatory system which builds on the FSA’s achievements over the last few years of major change,” Turner said in an e-mailed statement. “It is ironic that while in opposition the Tories identified the tripartite system as the root of all regulatory evil, yet here they are as government inventing multiple front- line agencies and creating distracting confusion in the process,” said Ash Saluja, a lawyer at CMS Cameron McKenna in London. Osborne also said he will bring under one roof the handling of “serious economic crime,” which is currently dealt with by a number of organizations. The chancellor also gave the names last night of the people who will work alongside former Bank of England Chief Economist John Vickers when he leads a panel on the future of banking. Martin Wolf of the Financial Times, Bill Winters , the former co-chief executive of JP Morgan’s investment bank, Martin Taylor, formerly of Barclays Plc, and Clare Spottiswoode , the former head of the gas regulator Ofgas, will work with Vickers on the Independent Banking Commission, Osborne said. To contact the reporter on this story: Gonzalo Vina in London at gvina@bloomberg.net .

Read the full article →

Osborne Scraps FSA in U.K.’s Biggest Bank Regulation Overhaul Since 1997

June 16, 2010

By Gonzalo Vina June 17 (Bloomberg) — Chancellor of the Exchequer George Osborne said he will abolish the Financial Services Authority and give most of its power to the Bank of England, undoing the regulatory system set up by Gordon Brown in 1997. In the most sweeping changes to financial regulation since then, the watchdog will be wound down and replaced by three bodies over the next two years, the chancellor said. A Prudential Regulatory Authority will be created as a subsidiary of the central bank. Osborne will also set up a Financial Policy Committee at the bank and establish a consumer protection and markets agency. Osborne, whose Conservative Party took power after the May 6 election, is delivering on a promise made almost a year ago to shake up the way the U.K.’s banks and markets are policed. He’s blamed the system established by former Labour Prime Minister Brown for failing to prevent a financial crisis that saddled taxpayers with liabilities of as much as 1.4 trillion pounds ($2.1 trillion) and plunged the economy into the worst recession since World War II. “At the heart of the crisis was a rapid and unsustainable increase in debt that our macroeconomic and regulatory system utterly failed to identify let alone prevent,” Osborne told bankers at his first Mansion House dinner in London’s financial district last night. Northern Rock Brown’s government had to nationalize Northern Rock Plc , the first U.K. casualty of the credit crunch, in February 2008. The lender nearly collapsed in 2007 after it had to seek emergency funding from the central bank and then suffered a run on its deposits. The government also had to take controlling stakes in Royal Bank of Scotland Group Plc and Lloyds Banking Group Plc . Osborne’s plan scraps Brown’s tripartite system of regulation — in which the central bank, FSA and Treasury shared responsibilities — and places most of the onus on Bank of England Governor Mervyn King . Legislation to replace the FSA will be in place by 2012, Osborne said. Angela Knight , the chief executive of the British Bankers’ Association, a lobby group, said she welcomed steps to make the system “clearer and more effective” and pledged to support the government during the transition. The FSA’s chief executive, Hector Sants , 54, will stay on at the authority while it is wound down and will take up new roles on the bodies that replace it, becoming a deputy governor of the central bank. ‘Macro Issues’ Executive power over financial supervision will go to the Financial Policy Committee at the central bank, which will operate in a similar way to its rate-setting monetary policy panel. The new committee “will have the tools and the responsibility to look across the economy at the macro issues that may threaten economic and financial stability and the tools to take effective action in response,” Osborne said. The committee will be chaired by King and will include Sants among its members. The panel’s work will be scrutinized by Parliament’s Treasury Committee, the chancellor said. The Prudential Regulatory Authority “will carry out the prudential regulation of financial firms, including banks, investment banks, building societies and insurance companies,” Osborne said. Sants will be its chief executive and King its chairman. Andrew Bailey, the head of the central bank unit that deals with failed banks, will be Sants’s deputy. ‘Authority, Knowledge’ “Only independent central banks have the broad macroeconomic understanding, the authority and the knowledge required to make the kind of macro-prudential judgments that are required now and in the future,” Osborne said. “They must also be responsible for day-to-day micro-prudential regulation as well.” The third pillar of Osborne’s regulatory overhaul will come with the creation of a Consumer Protection and Markets Authority. Osborne said the agency will regulate financial firms “providing services to consumers” and maintain the “integrity of the U.K.’s financial markets.” King told the Mansion House dinner that the new framework will assure the stability of the financial system. “A credible macro-prudential regime could help forestall both excessive exuberance and unnecessary caution,” King said. “By altering the pressure on the financial brakes according to circumstances, regulation, far from being an inflexible foe, would become a flexible friend.” FSA Chairman Adair Turner said he welcomed Osborne’s plans. ‘Much Clearer’ “The overall future shape of financial regulation is now much clearer and we are in a strong position to create a future regulatory system which builds on the FSA’s achievements over the last few years of major change,” Turner said in an e-mailed statement. “It is ironic that while in opposition the Tories identified the tripartite system as the root of all regulatory evil, yet here they are as government inventing multiple front- line agencies and creating distracting confusion in the process,” said Ash Saluja, a lawyer at CMS Cameron McKenna in London. Osborne also said he will bring under one roof the handling of “serious economic crime,” which is currently dealt with by a number of organizations. The chancellor also gave the names last night of the people who will work alongside former Bank of England Chief Economist John Vickers when he leads a panel on the future of banking. Martin Wolf of the Financial Times, Bill Winters , the former co-chief executive of JP Morgan’s investment bank, Martin Taylor, formerly of Barclays Plc, and Clare Spottiswoode , the former head of the gas regulator Ofgas, will work with Vickers on the Independent Banking Commission, Osborne said. To contact the reporter on this story: Gonzalo Vina in London at gvina@bloomberg.net .

Read the full article →

Sunil Chacko: US-India Business Council Celebrates Its 35th Anniversary

June 10, 2010

Hundreds of US and Indian participants celebrated the 35th anniversary of the US-India Business Council (USIBC) in Washington, DC on June 1 and 2. The sessions this year were focused on the themes of “Education, Infrastructure & Inclusive Growth.” The word infrastructure, as defined, includes “hard” power plants, roads, bridges, and “soft” health, as examples. In a nutshell, these three themes encompass the hopes and challenges facing millions in India and are central to US-India relations, and USIBC is wise to work on them. Further, in this information era, the USIBC event has become, in effect, a virtual component of the US-India strategic dialog, perhaps a more pertinent part than mere bilateral government to government talks, because it involves government and corporate leaders, think tankers, policy experts, academics and NGOs. Inaugural Session Opening the annual conference, USIBC President Ron Somers called attention to the rapidly growing membership of the organization, now at over 350 Fortune-500 and global Indian companies. He stressed how industry was ahead of the curve and plays a vital role in enhancing the relationship between US and India. To sustain growth at the current 8.5%, massive mobilization of capital will be required, including $1.5 trillion for infrastructure over the next decade. Further, creation of jobs and protection of the environment in both countries is a basis for the economic partnership. He urged industry to continue to provide leadership. Outgoing USIBC Chair Indra Nooyi of Pepsico described how much the USIBC has grown since its founding in 1975 and its key role in facilitating understanding on the US-India nuclear deal. India has since joined the nuclear suppliers’ group and has accepted International Atomic Energy Agency safeguards, but has refused to sign the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty while presenting a pristine track-record on nuclear non-proliferation. She also recalled the horrific Mumbai attacks of 2008 when over 300 lives were lost, and how both the US and India came together to deal with the aftermath with the USIBC playing a key facilitating role. Incoming USIBC Chair Terry McGraw of McGraw-Hill recalled his company’s 40 year publishing joint-venture with Tata. He urged the government to lower tariffs, to lift the cap on foreign direct investment in the insurance sector, build a strong long-term debt market, and have a US-India bilateral investment treaty. He promised the support of the USIBC and its member companies in increased trade and investment, recalling US President Obama’s goal to double exports in the next five years, and noted that President Obama will be the sixth US President to visit India. India’s middle-class is larger than the entire US population. Several speakers spoke about how 770 million people in India are below the age of 35, with 385 million people being under age 15, making India one of the few large non-aging countries in the world. Incidentally, China with its one-child policy has become the largest aging country of Asia, even outpacing Japan in that respect. Nevertheless, India has an enormous “inclusive education” challenge to ensure access to education and training. Projections include having to recruit 2 million teachers and build 6,500 “model” schools in less-developed areas. And generating employment through the private sector is another great challenge. This is why India’s External Affairs Minister Mr. S.M. Krishna stressed the revolution of entrepreneurship, creativity and innovation and said that India has become a global hub for innovation, design & development and manufacturing. His credibility stems from having helped expedite the IT revolution while he was chief minister of Karnataka and for making Bangalore a world IT capital. Mr. Krishna cited the example of State Bank of India’s low cost “tiny branch” for banking in remote areas, costing a little over $300 per branch. The branch is comprised of a mobile phone and a finger-print scanner. The branch can hold data of up to 50,000 customers, record details in 11 languages and is operated by women recruited at the village level. Furthermore, the devices work on battery that is rechargeable using solar energy. State Bank of India hopes to install 250,000 of these tiny branches across Indian villages. Another example he discussed was a non-profit rice husk based water purifier invented by a major Indian company. At a onetime cost of $20 and a recurring expense of $6 for every 3,000 litres, he said this is an example of an affordable innovation for safe drinking water across villages and middle class urban homes. Mr. Krishna said that products like the small car or a portable low cost ECG machine are other powerful examples of global capabilities applied to local needs, and have great potential in other markets. He added that around 200 Fortune-500 companies have set up research and development structures in India, and he opined that India looks to USA for its scientific output and the ability of converting this strength into wealth-generating innovations. India-US partnerships are now looking at providing low cost, efficient healthcare services to remote areas through mobile clinics, tele-medicine etc. Both countries can work together in streamlining health based IT solutions such as digitizing health records, joint research and collaboration in drug discovery, medical research and clinical trials. Commentary on the US-India Strategic Partnership Former Defense Secretary Bill Cohen explained that India has been recognized as one of the key centers of influence in the US National Security Strategy, commended the Singh-Obama 21st century Knowledge Initiative, and emphasized that it was not just national security but also food security and other components of human security that are at the core of the US-India relationship. The Federation of Indian Chambers of Commerce and Industry’s Dr. Amit Mitra spoke about how logistics and supply chain management had enhanced efficiency in Indian manufacturing, citing an example from the textile industry. With an estimated 40% of India’s fruits and vegetables being lost due to the absence of appropriate storage and cold chain, Dr. Mitra called for enhanced foreign collaboration on this area, and also on finding sustainable health care models to ensure access for some 600 million people who lack it. Dr. Vasant Narasimhan, Novartis Vaccines North America, said that his company was working to strengthen health care in rural India through private sector collaboration with the public system. John Wood of Room to Read spoke about his hope of creating 10,000 libraries in India. Brooks Entwistle, India country head of Goldman Sachs, discussed his company’s efforts to support women entrepreneurs, and emphasized that access to capital was as important as business education. Some lending institutions are charging an exorbitant 27% interest rate to entrepreneurs. David Good, chief representative of Tata in North America, introduced US Education Secretary Arne Duncan who said that education is the only sure path out of poverty. Secretary Duncan mentioned the $300,000 initial grant to build US-India education cooperation modeled on the USIBC that he has made to the Institute of International Education, a non-profit entity with offices in the US and India. India’s Minister for Human Resource Development Mr. Kapil Sibal, a Supreme Court lawyer, spoke about education empowering people and disadvantaged communities to move forward. Humanism, collaboration and respect for the individual should be built on the shoulders of knowledge, he said. Globalization and innovation are concurrent themes. So too is the culture of tolerance. He called attention to the Right to Education Act, the first time in 62 years that it has been passed by the Indian parliament, granting children the right to go to court in the event of local bodies using any reason, such as lack of resources, to deny them education. The right is drawn from a Constitutional section. Intangible assets, he said, comprise the primary wealth of a nation, and creativity sows the seeds of future wealth. He presented the daunting challenge of the Indian education sector of having to set up 700 universities in about 12 years, and 35,000 colleges. 22% of people in the US are above 65 years of age and in 2015 that group will be 39%. The corresponding percentages for Europe will be 53% and for Japan, 67%. Thus, it is India that has the vibrant young population, and of course they must be educated. David Rubenstein, co-founder of The Carlyle Group, a major private equity firm, predicted that India would become the third largest economy during this century, after China and the US, and described the US-India relationship as the second most important in the world, after the US-China one. Some others, on the sidelines, wondered if indeed because of the favorable age-pyramid that India has, whether in fact it might be the most important. Admiral Walter Doran, President of Raytheon Asia, discussed defense technologies that have spinoff benefits, including for maintaining internal security, and the value of investing in education, health infrastructure as well as the hard infrastructure of power plants, ports, airports, roads and bridges. Prof. Raj Kumar, President of Jindal University, called for endowments to be created in the process of university development, describing it as a big difference with the US pattern of private universities having large endowments to support students and faculty. Ambassador Nick Burns of the Cohen Group described the Indian Ocean region as being the most important from a strategic sense, with the US, China, India, Japan, and South East Asian countries having core interests. Yogi Deveshwar, Chairman of ITC, described the pioneering rural markets creation work that his company has undertaken to serve the “bottom of the pyramid” as enunciated by the late Prof. Prahalad. He discussed the triple financial, social and environmental bottom line of the modern corporation. In a press conference, new USIBC Chair Terry McGraw called for focus on corporate social responsibility, digital online learning tools, and the USIBC education initiative. Larry Summers, Director of the National Economic Council, described high quality Indian medical facilities that would increasingly attract patients from abroad in medical tourism. He recognized the Indian expatriate community’s role in catalyzing change in perceptions in the US. He spoke about the momentous transformations in the global economy, with the G-8 losing relevance and being replaced, in effect, by the G-20 of which India and the US are leading members. Prime Minister Dr. Manmohan Singh had asserted that he would not attend any more G-8 summits as a supplicant, and sure enough, the G-20 has become the major venue for global consultation. The Supreme Court Decision in June 2010 on the Bhopal Industrial Disaster of 1984 Amidst the euphoria of the follow-up of the USIBC event, the long-delayed Indian Supreme Court ruling on June 7, 2010 concerning the Bhopal industrial disaster of 1984 has had a sobering effect. In December 1984, an explosion at Union Carbide’s pesticide plant caused an estimated 40 tons of lethal methyl isocyanate gas to escape into the city of Bhopal exposing some 500,000 people and causing an estimated 15,000 deaths. Six safety measures designed to prevent a gas leak had either malfunctioned, were turned off or were otherwise inadequate. Further, the safety siren, intended to alert the community should a catastrophe occur at the plant, was turned off. The failure to compensate most of the thousands of victims and their families even after 26 years is undoubtedly a disgrace. The disaster is etched into the minds of corporate chieftains in India and their foreign partners, and safety and quality control have since 1984 become foremost on their minds. Further, the media has become far more watchful. Corollary — New Japanese Government Installed, India and USIBC can be Examples On June 8, 2010 yet another Japanese government was installed, that of new Prime Minister Mr. Naoto Kan, nine months after the previous Hatoyama government was elected in a landslide amidst ecstatic scenes, making Mr. Kan the fifth Japanese Prime Minister in the past four years. The ostensible reason was Dr. Hatoyama’s inability to convince the US on the Futenma military base matter , that had been a campaign pledge. It was handled so very differently from how India approached the US on the nuclear power issue, where India did not budge and it was the US that gradually came to understand India’s position and altered its own laws. Further, Indian Prime Ministers generally resign only when the ruling coalition loses its majority in the lower house of Parliament as is specified in the Constitution. Since India is the world’s largest parliamentary democracy, Japan would do well to learn from both the ruling Indian National Congress and its coalition partners, and indeed the opposition Bharatiya Janata Party and its coalition partners, on how parliamentary democracy can work without endless, damaging political instability as is happening in the world’s second largest economy of Japan. In all of the confabulations on the US-India nuclear deal, the USIBC did a fabulous job of building understanding on both sides of the other country’s positions and concerns. There is no equivalent organization for US-Japan, and it is worth having one for India-Japan. Needless to say, much of the USIBC’s success has been built on the passion and dedication of its inspiring President Ron Somers and successive high-profile Chairs such as Pepsico’s Indra Nooyi and now McGraw-Hill’s, Terry McGraw, and it is not easy to replicate that sort of leadership skill and commitment.

Read the full article →

Iran Opposition Struggles as Nuclear Sanctions Wrangle Boosts Ahmadinejad

June 8, 2010

By Ladane Nasseri, Henry Meyer and Ali Sheikholeslami June 9 (Bloomberg) — A year after hundreds of thousands of Iranians poured onto the streets to protest President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad ’s disputed re-election, the opposition has been almost silenced. Supporters of Ahmadinejad’s main rival, Mir Hossein Mousavi , and fellow candidate Mehdi Karrubi have struggled to reignite resistance after a violent government crackdown following the vote last June 12. The opposition’s divisions and failure to lure lower-income Iranians also have worked against it. U.S. tensions with Iran are making the task even harder, said Iranian expert Trita Parsi. The Green Movement that coalesced around the two politicians risks being further marginalized as United Nations economic sanctions over Iran’s nuclear program are scheduled to be voted on today, Parsi said. Mousavi’s and Karrubi’s denunciation of the U.S.-sponsored moves puts them on the same side as Ahmadinejad, reflecting popular opinion in the country. “Confrontation with the West helps the current regime sideline the opposition,” Parsi, an Iran scholar and president of the Washington-based National Iranian American Council , said in a May 25 telephone interview. “It’s difficult for them to keep up their protests.” A fourth round of sanctions, coming as Iran’s revenue sags with the 16 percent decline in oil prices from this year’s peak, may slow the country’s economy and weaken Ahmadinejad’s power, said Bjorvatn, professor of economics at the Norwegian School of Economics and Business Administration in Bergen. Anniversary Rallies The opposition movement, which accused Ahmadinejad of election fraud, is seeking permission to hold anniversary rallies on June 12 in the knowledge that the last major demonstration in Tehran, in February, was put down violently. The government has accused the U.S. and its allies of instigating the protests. In the past year, some parties have been banned, members jailed, their newspapers and websites shut, opposition rallies prohibited, phones monitored and Internet use disrupted, according to state-run media. The opposition says some followers were beaten and raped and that some died in custody. The government says 44 people died in the unrest, while Amnesty International says the number is at least double. Mousavi and Karrubi haven’t been spared in the crackdown. Karrubi has been attacked, his car shot at and his son beaten while in temporary detention, according to opposition websites. Mousavi’s nephew was killed, the opposition says. The Green Movement, named for Mousavi’s campaign color, won’t “be stopped by jailing and threatening nor by killing people,” he said on his website on May 29. Opposition Divided Still, the opposition is split between those who want to get rid of the Shiite Muslim establishment and forces that press to make it more democratic, said Mohsen Kadivar , 51, a dissident who has been jailed in Iran and now lives in Durham, North Carolina. The inability of Mousavi and Karrubi to galvanize support outside the urban middle class and among less educated voters has prevented them from expanding the movement, said Kadivar, a Shiite cleric close to the opposition who is a visiting instructor on Duke University’s religion faculty. “The government has spent oil revenues among the lower classes of society without any limits and without oversight from the parliament,” he said in a telephone interview. “The opposition is competing with the injection of an unlimited amount of cash.” Making Weapons? Emboldened at home, Ahmadinejad and Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei are digging in their heels over threatened UN sanctions aimed at halting the enrichment of uranium, which can fuel a nuclear reactor or form the core of a bomb. Iran says the work is for civilian purposes, denying allegations by the U.S. and some allies that the nation may be trying to make weapons. “The Green Movement does not back the weakening of the nation,” Mousavi said in a May 24 statement. “Although the current situation has arisen due to the incompetence and reckless foreign policies of this government, we cannot agree with these sanctions that would affect people’s lives.” Karrubi told Italy’s Corriere Della Sera newspaper in an interview published on Feb. 26 that he is “absolutely” opposed to sanctions because “they increase the economic pressure that the people already suffer.” In the nation of 73 million, the fourth-largest oil producer, more than 10 million people live in “absolute” poverty and another 30 million in “relative” poverty, Iran’s statistics agency said on May 28. Uranium Swap Iran said on May 17 that it would swap enriched uranium for fuel to run a medical-research reactor. A day later, the U.S. gained Russian and Chinese backing in the UN Security Council for a draft of sanctions targeting Iran’s financial interests, arms imports and shipping. Iran vowed to continue enriching uranium regardless of the proposed fuel swap, which Ahmadinejad described on May 26 as a “historic opportunity” and probably the last chance for President Barack Obama to change the “wrong and inhuman approach” of previous U.S. administrations. At a time when crude prices have plunged to $72 a barrel since hitting a 19-month high of $87.15 a barrel on May 3, Iran is more vulnerable to sanctions, said Lexington, Massachusetts- based IHS Global Insight analyst Alyssa Rallis. The government’s budget of $368 billion for the current fiscal year is based on oil at $60 per barrel. Oil revenue accounts for 80 percent of the budget, according to the London- based Economist Intelligence Unit. Iranian oil output hasn’t returned to the 5.2 million- barrels-a-year mark reached in December 1978, weeks before the revolution that ousted the monarchy and led to the first U.S. unilateral sanctions against Iran. Iran produced 3.8 million barrels of oil a day in April, according to Bloomberg data. “Lower oil revenues will reduce Ahmadinejad’s ability to buy support, and therefore his power,” said Norway’s Bjorvatn, in an e-mailed reply to questions on June 7. “That’s good news for the opposition.” To contact the reporters on this story: Ladane Nasseri in Tehran at lnasseri@bloomberg.net ; Henry Meyer in Dubai at hmeyer4@bloomberg.net To contact the reporter on this story: Ali Sheikholeslami in London at alis2@bloomberg.net

Read the full article →

Chris Curtin: Channel Enablement: Manufacturers and Retailers Pursuing Common Ground

June 4, 2010

Marketing professionals use a term called “channel enablement.” It’s the art and science of helping retailers sell your products — in the store and on the Web. In the past, channel enablement meant making sure the retailer had all the data sheets for your products. And ideally, they also had your shiny brochures and catalogs for the display racks. But shopping has changed. Shoppers do a great deal of online research to learn more and to save time and money. That means manufacturers and their retail partners must evolve their marketing and selling to cater to the preferences and behaviors of today’s shopper — both online and in the store. Yet, all the while, the overall goal remains the same: Making sure it’s easy to differentiate and buy their products. Replicating the in-store and online shopping experience Consumer research from industry groups and at companies like HP has revealed some interesting things about shoppers: There’s a difference between consumers and shoppers. Shoppers don’t read. They scan. Shoppers expect in-store “look and feel” to be similar to your Web site. They expect your Web site experience to to be interactive. Consumers are different from shoppers Retailers and manufacturers have typically thought of the people buying their products as consumers — people using their products. They would hire agencies to create marketing materials expounding product benefits and product usages without a great deal of consideration for the in-store environment. But research shows that when we shop, we have a different mindset and different needs than when we are using the product at home or in the office. When we go to the store, we begin shopping the moment we get out of our car. We want to find what we’re looking for amid a sea of products, all of them vying for our attention with the same bright colors and displays. It’s a sea of sameness. As shoppers, we want to easily find, learn about, differentiate and select our product with confidence. This requires manufacturers and retailers to change the way they market — they have to consider both the consumer of their products and the shopper of their products to effectively and efficiently satisfy their customers. Shoppers don’t read. They scan. Shoppers — online and in the store — want to quickly determine if a product is right for them. They don’t read word-for-word. They scan — words, sentences, paragraphs, entire pages — looking for the key specs and features that they need. This has major implications for how you present your information to shoppers — online and in-store. Shoppers need quick, easy-to-scan bullet points and bite-sized chunks of text — broken out in clearly labeled sections for easy scanning and understanding. Online and in-store “look and feel” should be the same Most people who buy consumer electronics do online research and then go to the store for the purchase. Research has shown that shoppers have good recall. They expect things to look the same in the store as they saw it online — the displays should look and feel just like your Web site. Shoppers don’t want to start the research all over again in the store after they’ve searched online. Bring the product to life online Beyond the value of speaking to a salesperson, people like to shop in the store because they can see and demo the product. Online shoppers want a similar experience — with detailed images from all angles and video demos detailing product features and benefits. Getting manufacturers and retailers on the same page Selling your products via retailers means using their channels — their stores and their Web sites. Procter & Gamble and Coca-Cola for years have led the way in understanding the psychology of shoppers — and converting their channel partners into believers. In the retail world, this is also known as “shopper marketing.” Improving collaboration between manufacturers and retailers is the focus of a task force formed last year: the Retail Commission on Shopper Marketing . Strategic advisers to the commission include Campbell’s Soup, Clorox, Kimberly-Clark, and HP — the only consumer electronics company on the board. Convert your channel partners to shopper advocates Convincing your partners that you know how to ideally sell your products can sometimes be complicated. Here are some real-world things you can do in working with your channel partners: Do your research. Know your shoppers. Share your knowledge of shopper behavior — with the retail staff and, if possible, the retailer’s executives. Provide your retailer with product information for their Web site and stores in a format that you know your shoppers want. Be active in professional organizations like the In-store Marketing Institute and eMarketing Association . It’s a great way to build your knowledge and share best practices. Lead the change — the payoff is there. Think long-term and keep plugging away. Find retailer evangelists to help convince others in his or her organization. And remember: Know your shopper and keep it simple — online and in the store.

Read the full article →

Stocks, Commodities Rally on U.S. Home, Car Sales Yen Weakens

June 3, 2010

By Akiko Ikeda and Masaki Kondo June 3 (Bloomberg) — Asian stocks rallied the most in six months, oil gained and the risk of corporate bond defaults fell as rising sales of U.S. homes and cars bolstered confidence in the global economy. The Japanese yen weakened for a second day. The MSCI Asia Pacific Index advanced 2.8 percent to 113.84 at 4 p.m. in Tokyo, the most since Nov. 30. The Stoxx Europe 600 increased 1.3 percent. Oil for July delivery climbed 1.9 percent to $74.23 a barrel after U.S. crude inventories declined. Standard & Poor’s 500 Index futures rose 0.5 percent. Asian stocks are recovering from the biggest drop in 19 months in May, as reports in the U.S. showed a recovery in consumer demand, ahead of data today that may show an improving job market. Japanese investors sought higher-yielding assets in the week ended May 28, buying a net 1.17 trillion yen ($12.7 billion) in overseas debt during the week ended May 28 and 276 billion yen in stocks abroad, Ministry of Finance data showed. “The data provides assurance that the U.S. economy is improving and that’s boosting investor sentiment,” said Yoshihiro Ito , a senior strategist at Okasan Asset Management Co., which oversees about $10 billion in Tokyo. “Technical indicators show that the recent declines are excessive and investors are hunting for bargains.” The MSCI Asia Pacific Index’s 14-day relative strength index , which measures how rapidly prices have risen or fallen, closed at 33 yesterday, near the 30 threshold some investors use as a signal to buy. The stock index dropped 10 percent in May. Canon, Nissan Japan’s Nikkei 225 Stock Average rallied 3.2 percent, Hong Kong’s Hang Seng Index jumped 1.7 percent, South Korea’s Kospi index climbed 1.9 percent and Taiwan’s 3Taiex index advanced 2.3 percent. An index of pending U.S. home resales rose 6 percent in April, the National Association of Realtors said, exceeding the median forecast of economists surveyed by Bloomberg News. U.S. companies created 70,000 jobs in May, according to a separate survey before the ADP Employer Services report today. The S&P 500 surged 2.6 percent, rebounding from a near three-month low. HSBC Holdings Plc, Europe’s biggest bank by market value, gained 1.9 percent after a government report showed Hong Kong’s home sales rose 8.7 percent in May from a year earlier. Wells Fargo & Co. advanced 3.4 percent yesterday in the U.S. after saying consumer credit began to improve last November. “We’re buying selected stocks,” said Terrace Chum , who helps manage $6 billion at MFC Global Investment Management in Hong Kong. “We’re still waiting for clearer signals whether there are still problems in Europe and we’re waiting to see whether the growth slowdown in China will be more serious.” Consumer Demand Canon Inc. , a camera maker that gets about 80 percent of its revenue outside Japan, gained 3.4 percent. Taiwan’s Hon Hai Precision Industry Co. , which assembles Apple Inc.’s iPhones, climbed 4.6 percent. Nissan Motor Co., Japan’s third-largest automaker, rose 4.8 percent after reporting a 24 percent increase in U.S. car sales in May from a year earlier. Toyota Motor Corp., the world’s biggest carmaker, climbed 3.6 percent after posting a 6.7 percent sales gain. Kia Motors Corp. , South Korea’s second- biggest automaker, advanced 3.2 percent after U.S. sales rose 21 percent last month. South Korea’s 2010 trade surplus will probably exceed the government’s earlier estimate of $20 billion as exports rise more than 20 percent, the Knowledge Economy Ministry said. Australia’s trade balance unexpectedly swung to an A$134 million surplus in April on coal and iron ore exports, government data showed. Copper for delivery in three months on the London Metal Exchange climbed as much as 1.4 percent to $6,760 a metric ton on global growth optimism. Nickel advanced as much as 2.8 percent to $20,200. Yen Weakened The yen weakened against all of its major counterparts as the search for a new prime minister in Japan and signs the U.S. economy is gaining traction tilted demand toward higher-yielding assets. The currency weakened 0.7 percent to 113.58 per euro and 0.3 percent to 92.35 per dollar, after dropping 1.3 percent yesterday. The euro rallied 0.4 percent to $1.2304. It touched $1.2111 on June 1, the lowest level since April 2006. “Once investors shift their attention back to the fundamentals, which are still signaling solid improvement, there is no strong reason to buy the yen,” said Morio Okayasu , chief analyst in Tokyo at FOREX.com Japan Co. “Underlying demand for higher-yielding assets outside Japan remains strong.” The yen also depreciated on speculation Prime Minister Yukio Hatoyama will be succeeded by Finance Minister Naoto Kan , who has called for the Bank of Japan to do more to fight deflation. “Kan, or whoever the successor is, won’t try to talk up the value of the yen,” said Kazumasa Yamaoka , a senior analyst in Tokyo at GCI Capital Co., an investment advisory company. Political Upheaval The South Korean won rose 1.5 percent to 1,197.65 per dollar. JPMorgan Chase & Co. yesterday raised the nation’s equities to “overweight” and said the won is one of the “most undervalued” emerging-market currencies. The cost of insuring Asia-Pacific bonds from non-payment dropped, according to traders of credit-default swaps. The Markit iTraxx Asia index of 50 investment-grade borrowers outside Japan declined 9 basis points to 136, according to Royal Bank of Scotland Group Plc. To contact the reporters on this story: Masaki Kondo in Tokyo at mkondo3@bloomberg.net ; Akiko Ikeda in Tokyo at iakiko@bloomberg.net .

Read the full article →

DK Matai: The Achilles Heel of Markets?

May 29, 2010

It has been the worst May for stocks since 1940. The last time May was this bad, neither had Pearl Harbour been bombed forcing the US to enter World War II, nor had the US recovered from The Great Depression. Although suppressed for much of the global markets recovery that began in March 2009, volatility has sprung back with a vengeance in May. On May 21st the “fear index” — the “volatility index” of the Chicago Board of Options Exchange, also known as VIX — rose to a 12 month high. May 6th, the day of the “flash crash,” saw the biggest intraday point drop ever in the Dow Jones Industrial Average. The last-hour market swings, as the European debt crisis injects more uncertainty, are also increasing with every passing day. This volatility reflects a lack of buying interest among long term investors and an intra-day focus for high-frequency traders in the absence of a clear market direction. High Frequency Trading Super Arbitrage The role of high-frequency trading is gathering pace, commanding a bigger and bigger share of financial markets’ activity worldwide in equities, bonds, commodities, futures and currencies. High-frequency traders are behaving like computer jockeys. They run complex trading algorithmic software on superfast computers and search the markets for tiny price differentials so that they can carry out super arbitrage. By trading hundreds of millions or even a billion units a day at lightning speed, high-frequency traders pick up fractional pennies each time. The more volatile the market, the easier it is for them to make money jumping in and out of assets across multiple exchanges. High-frequency traders are really just trying to skim the bid to offer spread on a trade. It may only be as low as $0.01 on many trades but, if one does it for 100,000,000 — 100 million — units that’s over one million dollars a day of profit! High-frequency trading firms rarely go home with a position if they can help it because they make money by maximising transactional volume and minimising risk. What Does Volatility Mean? Markets become volatile when liquidity dries up. This means people can’t trade stocks at a fair price, when they want. High-frequency traders thrive off volatility, because when liquidity is in short supply, it becomes very profitable for them to provide it. On days with big movements, in the realm of triple digits, high-frequency traders can make a lot of money via this super arbitrage. As a result, May has proved to be the biggest gold mine for high-frequency trading firms since the crash of late 2008 and early 2009. While many long-term investors lost their shirts during The Great Unwind (2007-?) and The Great Reset (2008-?), the high-frequency traders posted huge profits, as they are doing now. Shadow Markets In their defence, high-frequency traders say that because their intense trading provides liquidity, they help markets run smoothly, improving the environment for all investors. They say their actions make the markets more functional and fair to typical investors. Given that the high-frequency traders and broker dealers have a symbiotic relationship, they are both actively masquerading as liquidity providers when in fact they are normally liquidity takers, the knowledge transfer of the transactional information being all important. It is clear that high-frequency trading serves no larger purpose. It does not raise capital for companies, create jobs or stimulate innovations in the broader economy. The trades remain completely divorced from underlying economic fundamentals. The high-frequency traders know little or nothing about the companies their computers are feverishly buying and selling. If one combines the speed at which they operate, the outsourcing of decision making to computer algorithms, and an almost complete lack of regulation, this shadow market can fuel and exaggerate volatility. Anti-Value Investing High-frequency traders have been branded as the new “black hats” of high finance. Their computer-driven methods, which now account for upwards of two thirds of all US equity volume, are proliferating. To a large degree, fundamental investment strategies — such as buying and selling stocks based on a company’s long term performance — have taken a back seat to high-frequency trading algorithms hunting for inefficiencies in daily pricing and super arbitrage opportunities. Reach, Richness and Speed High-frequency trading has been spreading from the US and Canadian stock markets into new geographies — Europe, Asia and Latin America — and all asset classes including equities, bonds, commodities, futures and currencies. Assuming the new financial regulatory reform bill forces over-the-counter derivatives on to exchanges, high-frequency traders will no doubt trade them too. Every day, things are getting faster in the world of high finance and trading. Four years ago, executing a trade in a millisecond — one thousandth of a second — was considered fast; now the top high-frequency trading firms and broker dealers are trading in microseconds. That’s one millionth of a second. Conclusion Law-makers and regulators are right to get nervous. Senator Ted Kaufman — Democrat from Delaware — who understands the risk of high-frequency trading, or HFT, says, “I’m afraid that we’re sowing the seeds of the next financial crash.” He has called for the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to investigate high-frequency traders and the impact they have had on the broad markets. In the aftermath of the May 6th “flash crash”, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has recently voted to propose rules that would give the agency and securities exchanges more timely information about high-frequency trades so that they can better oversee the markets. The proposal requires exchanges and broker dealers that trade on the exchanges to provide detailed information about quotes, orders and trades to what would be a newly created central repository. Whilst the creation of a central repository may be helpful, it is unclear how this could prevent a “flash crash” caused by high-frequency trades in the future. Human real time is measured and understood in minutes and seconds, whereas the machines are trading in millionths of seconds. In order to be able to understand what happens in a future “flash crash” the regulators would have to play the data from a central repository in slow motion over days or even weeks! What good is it to drive an open-top car at high speed with one’s eyes glued to the rear view mirror?

Read the full article →

Revolving Door Between BP And Its Regulator Getting More Attention

May 26, 2010

WASHINGTON — At a 2005 workshop, a senior official in the U.S. government’s Minerals Management Service raised concerns about ultra-deepwater drilling and included the bullet point, “Few or no regulations or standards.” Within two years, Jim Grant left his post as chief of staff of the government’s Gulf of Mexico region to take a job with BP PLC – one of the companies his former agency regulated in its oversight of offshore drilling. Grant’s change is one example of the revolving door between the Interior Department’s MMS and the oil industry, which increasingly has the attention of Congress, the Obama administration and watchdog groups after the disastrous BP oil spill at an ultra-deepwater rig in the Gulf of Mexico. Just this week, a government report said drilling regulators have been so close to the industry they’ve been accepting gifts from oil and gas companies and even negotiating to go work for them. As BP’s regulatory compliance and environmental manager for the Gulf of Mexico strategic performance unit, Grant has weighed in on several offshore drilling proposals by his former federal employer and other government agencies. Last fall, speaking at a U.S. ocean policy task force, Grant cautioned the group to “carefully weigh policies that may establish exclusionary zones, disrupt the MMS leasing program or affect opportunities for economic growth,” according to a statement posted at WhiteHouse.gov. He said BP supports access to areas previously off-limits to leasing, such as the eastern Gulf of Mexico. “It is our opinion that economic development of ocean resources is compatible with responsible ocean stewardship,” he said. President Barack Obama made pledges during the campaign to limit the influence of special interests and promises now to end the “cozy relationship” between the oil industry and federal regulators, which he said had existed for years and into his own administration. Interior Secretary Ken Salazar acknowledged at a Senate hearing last week that there has been a revolving door problem at his agency. The new report by Interior’s inspector general flagged the issue, too. “Of greatest concern to me is the environment in which these inspectors operate – particularly the ease with which they move between industry and government,” wrote Acting Inspector General Mary Kendall. Kendall said the investigation found that even after starting job negotiations with Island Operating Co., an MMS inspector conducted four inspections of the same company’s platforms – and found no problems. Soon after, the unidentified inspector resigned to work for the company. The revolving door can undermine government regulation in several ways. Former government workers who move to industries they once regulated can take advantage of personal relationships at their former agencies on behalf of their new companies. They can exploit loopholes in regulations based on their knowledge of the federal bureaucracy. And even before leaving, government employees hoping to one day land high-paying jobs with companies they regulate might be tempted to ease off. MMS has long been targeted by government investigators, lawmakers and watchdog groups. In 2008, an investigation by Interior’s inspector general described a “culture of substance abuse and promiscuity” at the minerals agency, finding that workers at the MMS royalty collection office in Denver partied, had sex and used drugs with energy company representatives. Employees also accepted gifts, ski trips and golf outings. Then-Inspector General Earl E. Devaney assailed “a culture of ethical failure” and an agency rife with conflicts of interest. “To say that MMS has had a revolving door problem doesn’t even begin to describe how profoundly this agency has entangled itself with industry,” said Mandy Smithberger, an investigator with the Washington-based Project on Government Oversight, a private watchdog group. “The revolving door has spun so readily in this case that the lines between the regulators and the regulated are now virtually nonexistent.” The government restricts certain practices by federal workers. Government employees who participate in contracts, grants or lawsuits generally are barred forever from representing anyone before a federal department or court on that matter. For employees who supervised such matters in the final year of their government service, that ban lasts for two years. “Very senior” employees – such as Cabinet officers, the vice president and some high-level White House officials – are subject to a two-year cooling-off period, during which they are banned from contacting their former agencies or certain high-level executive branch employees in any federal agency. “Senior employees” – who include other presidential appointees – are subject to a one-year cooling-off period, although Obama made these people sign a pledge agreeing to extend it to two years as a condition of employment. Grant’s name surfaced at a congressional hearing when Rep. Kathy Castor, D-Fla., asked BP America President Lamar McKay about former Interior officials who worked at his company and about former BP officials who work for the Interior Department. Grant did not return telephone and e-mail messages seeking comment, and BP declined to discuss his employment. McKay also cited Sylvia Baca as someone who went from BP to Interior. She made the switch twice. In the Clinton administration, she served as the Interior Department’s assistant secretary for land and minerals management and worked as the department’s acting director of the Bureau of Land Management. In 2001, Baca joined BP, where she worked in several senior management positions. Last June, Salazar brought her back to Interior, tapping her for the position of deputy assistant secretary for land and minerals management. He cited her “professionalism and detailed knowledge of Interior’s land and energy responsibilities.” Asked about her hiring at a House hearing Wednesday, Deputy Interior Secretary David Hayes said that Baca has recused herself from the oil spill because of her prior employment with BP. “She has not been involved in offshore energy issues,” he added. More generally, the offshore drilling industry has tapped the government’s expertise and connections. The National Ocean Industries Association, an offshore energy trade group, has plucked its last two presidents from the ranks of former MMS directors. In March, Randall Luthi, who was MMS director from July 2007 through January of last year, took over the industry post, replacing Tom Fry, who had been president of the group since December 2000. Through a spokeswoman, Luthi declined an interview request. Fry did not return a message left through the National Marine Sanctuaries Foundation, where he serves as a trustee.

Read the full article →

Steve Parker: Three automotive stories you want to know

May 24, 2010

Tesla to Downey, CA – Drop dead! If you’re driving through Downey, CA, I wouldn’t recommend driving a Tesla. A dream of Downey leaders to re-open an old Space Shuttle facility in their city, just south of Los Angeles, where Tesla told the city they wanted to build the cars, has fallen through. And Downey is pissed. Tesla buys cars from Lotus and ships them to the US where they are retro-fitted with electric motors and batteries for their all-electric sporty car. They have another, larger car planned for next year. Tesla EV Roadster Downey was once at the center, like much of Southern California, of American aerospace manufacturing. The city boomed from the ’50s through the early ’90s when the country’s space program lost much of its funding and seemed to lose its own dreams for the future. So when Tesla and Downey made the announcement recently that an old Space Shuttle plant would be re-opened for Tesla to build their EVs, a lot of people thought it a good idea. More than 1,000 Downey-area people could be hired in an area which has been hard-hit by the recession. Downey and Tesla were to sign their agreement last Friday, May 21st, and city leaders were looking forward to the ceremony as an early Christmas – and a sure way to guarantee their re-elections. Last Thursday, 24 hours or so before the agreement was to be signed, Tesla made a stunning announcement – Toyota was going to infuse some $50 million into the EV-maker, and Teslas are going to be built at a plant in Fremont, CA (just south of San Francisco), which was shared by Toyota and GM and was recently shuttered, putting some 5,000 mostly-union workers out of their jobs. The plant, called New United Motor Manufacturing Inc. (NUMMI) was a joint venture between the two auto giants, with Toyota running the plant and making Corollas and GM building Pontiac Vibes there, too. Toyota gets some good press from their investment and plant re-opening (1,000 people may be hired initially) and will learn more about EV technology and maybe share some of their knowledge with Tesla. PayPal co-founder Elon Musk, Chairman, Product Architect and CEO of Tesla, is now on the big map as far as mass-produced EVs are concerned and so is California. The only loser here is Downey and the people there who thought they might be getting new gigs in the green economy. Was it bad faith negotiating on Tesla’s part? Or just business? What do you think? When will the first lawsuit from Downey be filed? Things were a lot simpler when Downey was mostly known as the home of Karen and Richard Carpenter. Los Angeles Times – Toyota does it again In yesterday’s Sunday edition, the lead story on the LA Times’ front page was yet another expose’ by writer Ken Bensinger about Toyota failing to notify the public about a serious problem. Bensinger has broken much of the big news about the Toyota scandal and we predict a Pulitzer for him and the paper this year. The piece says Toyota, through their Lexus division, never publicly acknowledged or reported to the government about a serious problem with the automatic transmissions in their 2002 through 2006 Lexus ES300 sedans. 2002 ES300 Apparently, according to the article, Toyota/Lexus issued what’s known as a “secret recall” and possibly a Technical Service Bulletin (TSD) to their dealers. What this essentially means is that if an ES300 owner came into the dealer and complained specifically about the transmission problem, the dealer could then fix or replace the transmission and get paid by Toyota for the service. But if an owner never said anything, the car wouldn’t be fixed by a dealer. The transmission problems reportedly included hard shifts, surging and unintended acceleration. Is Toyota playing business as usual? Or had their arrogance grown so great that they felt they had no responsibility to report potential serious safety problems to the public at all? What do you think? Where will this all end? Car dealers exempt from proposed consumer agency One of the more consumer-friendly parts of the proposed laws surrounding the world of money in this country is the creation of a new watchdog agency to oversee companies which make consumer loans. But don’t expect car dealers which make loans to buyers to have to report to the agency. Automotive News reports today that dealer groups prevailed in a U.S. Senate vote on whether to exempt dealers from oversight by a proposed consumer finance agency. The Senate voted to recommend to its leaders that they agree to the exemption in a conference committee with House leaders. The non-binding vote today was 60-30. Senate and House leaders will meet in weeks ahead to reconcile differences in the financial regulation bills that passed the two chambers. The House measure included a regulatory exemption for dealers who are arranging consumer loans. The Senate bill did not contain such an exemption. What can you say about something which appears so blatantly to profit and protect dealers and not give car-buyers use of an agency whose jobs it is to oversee consumer loans? What do you think?

Read the full article →

Stephan B. Tanda: Health Is the Achilles Heel of Corporate America

May 19, 2010

The two biggest domestic political issues that dominated our national discourse over 2009 and 2010 were healthcare reform and the economic crisis. However, these two issues were rarely discussed in conjunction, especially in many of the boardrooms of major US corporations. This is a common mistake as there is a strong link between the health and wellness of employees and company profit and performance. A report by the World Economic Forum on corporate health and wellness estimates that the global loss in productivity due to chronic illness hovers around the $2 trillion mark. The United States alone rakes up half of this shortfall, estimated at $1 trillion. To put this number is perspective, the entire US bank bailout in 2009 was $700 billion, or $300 billion less than the economic loss from health related lower productivity. Added to this, corporations in the US are also faced with soaring healthcare costs for its employees as nearly all major corporations offer health insurance as an employment benefit. In contrast, companies that have adopted proactive, corporate wellness programs have experienced an average savings of $700 per employee per year and have seen a return on investment upwards of 755% in reduced healthcare costs and higher productivity levels. While corporate health and wellness programs are not mainstream, these programs are far from a new concept. Companies across the globe, both in white collar and blue collar industries, have created successful programs that have delivered impressive and often inspiring results. Blue Cross/Blue Shield of Indiana and Coors Brewing Company, for example, both introduced a corporate fitness program, which reaped a ROI of 151% and 515% respectively. In many cases, especially for labor intensive industries, the failure to adopt a wellness program can be very costly. Cainbro, one of the largest civil and heavy industrial construction companies in the US, was experiencing an average increase in healthcare costs of 21%. The company decided to introduce a wellness and safety program in an attempt to reduce their healthcare expenditures. After the first year, the company experienced a savings over their projected healthcare expenditures of over $1.2 million. By year four, their saving grew to almost $5 million. Corporate health and wellness programs are also strong morale boosters and a powerful talent retention and recruitment tool. Organizations that have and actively promote such programs are seen to be top performers in their sector and they are 4 times less likely to lose talent within the next year. Research by the World Economic Forum has shown that 64% of employees that have a favorable view of their company’s health and wellness program plan to stay with the company for at least five years. Given the enormous cost savings benefits, increases in productivity and competitive advantage, especially in a globalized economy, there is a strong business rationale for companies to invest in developing robust and comprehensive health and wellness programs. However, in order to achieve this, companies need to adopt sophisticated and strategic programs that have deep corporate engagement and that holistically address health. In other words, it should not be seen as simply a Human Resources project or a one-off event but rather a strategic board level decision aimed at making the company perform better and be more attractive for its current and prospective employees. As a board member, I have a responsibility to look after the bottom line and to make decisions that will improve the financial position of the company. From our experience, I can honestly say that it has begun to make a difference. Having a long established expertise in nutrition, we can draw on our knowledge to invest in our human resources. Consequently, we are building a robust health and wellness program across our global operations and developing it into a service offering we are taking to the marketplace. While the business benefits are clear, on a personal level, what has been even more gratifying for me is to hear personal stories of employees that have lost weight, lowered their cholesterol and blood pressure levels and in general are happier at work. As we spend more and more of our time at work, I believe that we, as business leaders, need to make the work environment as rewarding as possible. I am glad that we have found a way to not only achieve this goal but to improve the performance of the company at the same time. Therefore, I would urge my fellow business leaders to seriously consider introducing health and wellness programs as a key performance driver. Furthermore, industry associations also have a role to play. For example, the Grocery Manufacturers Association’s Health Weight Commitment program was developed to reduce obesity through school and workplace initiatives and more informative packaging. Such actions are highly commendable as they contribute to the promotion of healthy lifestyles for all members of the family. It is also important for government to actively promote the uptake of these programs from small businesses to major corporations. This can range from providing incentives to companies that initiate such programs within their organizations to an aggressive communication campaign, similar to Michelle Obama’s Childhood Obesity Initiative, which is a multi-agency, multi-stakeholder plan to holistically address childhood wellness. Finally employees must show their interest, desire and commitment to partake in these programs to ensure that they are successful for the benefit of themselves, their families and their organizations. Thus, we all have a responsibility in our professional and personal capacities to make these programs work, which requires sincere and genuine dedication. By proactively addressing health and wellness in the work place, combined with such efforts as the First Lady’s childhood obesity initiative, and incorporating healthy habits into our homes, we can begin to create a new health paradigm that will ultimately make us more successful as individuals and as a society.

Read the full article →

Icahn Is Said to Be in Talks With Lions Gate to End Hostile Takeover Offer

May 14, 2010

By Michael White May 14 (Bloomberg) — Lions Gate Entertainment Corp. and Carl Icahn have held talks about awarding him board seats and ending his hostile takeover bid for the independent film studio, two people with the knowledge of the matter said. Discussions have taken place in the past two weeks, said the people, who declined to be identified because the discussions are private. Canadian regulators voided the Vancouver-based company’s “poison pill” on April 28, giving more leverage to Icahn, who had sought board seats in the past. An agreement to withdraw the $7 a share offer would end a three-month battle that started after Icahn had been pushing in corporate filings for board seats. Icahn is seeking terms that are similar to those outlined in his February tender offer, in which he asked for three seats, said one of the people. Icahn didn’t return a call to his office seeking comment. Annabelle Rinehart, an outside spokeswoman for Lions Gate, said the company had no comment. Since the original $6 a share offer on Feb. 16, Lions Gate has advanced 30 percent. Icahn, who owns almost 19 percent of the stock, started his takeover attempt after Lions Gate rejected his demands to increase his influence over management, which he has criticized over its spending. His offer values the distributor of the “Saw” and Tyler Perry comedies at about $826 million. Lions Gate, run from Santa Monica, California, lost 12 cents to $6.66 at 11:10 in New York Stock Exchange composite trading. The shares traded at $5.23 in February, prior to the initial offer. Jon Feltheimer , Lions Gate’s co-chairman and chief executive officer, has called the offer “very insufficient.” A three-judge panel of the British Columbia Court of Appeal upheld regulators’ decision to void the poison pill on May 7. He sought to increase his influence over the independent film studio, which he has criticized over its spending. In an earlier bid for shares, Icahn also demanded the company not make acquisitions of more than $100 million. The studio won a symbolic victory May 12 when shareholders voted to support the poison pill even though it was ruled invalid. Investors holding 58.9 million shares, or 56 percent of the stock, supported the poison pill defense designed to make a takeover more expensive, the company said on May 12. Shareholders representing 44 percent, or 46.8 million shares, were opposed. Icahn said in a statement noted that investors who bought Lions Gate shares after March 23 weren’t able to vote. Icahn extended his offer for Lions Gate on May 10. About 7.45 million shares were tendered and not withdrawn. The company has about 117.8 million shares outstanding, according to Bloomberg data, including those held by Icahn. To contact the reporters on this story: Michael White in Los Angeles at Mwhite8@bloomberg.net .

Read the full article →

Citigroup Says Ex-Employee Told Deutsche Bank Secrets

May 3, 2010

By Andrea Tan May 3 (Bloomberg) — Citigroup Inc. has sued Gautam Hazarika , a former Singapore-based director in its global markets unit, accusing him of handing confidential information to Deutsche Bank AG before joining the German bank. Deutsche Bank’s head of corporate flow sales for Asia, excluding Japan, denied the allegations and is today scheduled to ask Singapore’s High Court to set aside an order allowing Citigroup to search his apartment, car and home computer. Hazarika was in “flagrant breach” of his employment contract and duties to Citigroup by sending e-mails containing trade secrets to Deutsche Bank , Standard Chartered Plc and his personal account, the New York-based lender said in its Nov. 30 lawsuit. Deutsche Bank isn’t a defendant in the Citigroup suit. Citigroup’s suit comes after Merrill Lynch & Co. sued Deutsche Bank for allegedly raiding its bankers and misappropriating trade secrets last year and Royal Bank of Scotland Group Plc fired its Singapore-based chief currency trader in May last year for sending e-mails allegedly containing confidential data. The cases highlight the intense rivalry among banks for bankers who can “bring across a decent book of clients,” said Siraj Omar, head of litigation at Premier Law LLC in Singapore, who isn’t involved in the suit. “The idea is to make things as difficult as possible for the bankers who are leaving, which is only logical from the banks’ perspective.” Citigroup Probe Citigroup started an investigation after Toby Frei , its head of foreign currency bank sales for Asia Pacific, heard that Hazarika had “given Deutsche Bank everything” when socializing with unidentified officials from the Frankfurt-based lender on Nov. 16, court filings showed. Hazarika was also exploring a possible position with Standard Chartered, according to the documents. “There’s no way I can show that the allegations are untrue” unless the Deutsche Bank officials are identified and confirm the statement, Hazarika said in his affidavit. “It may well even have been a joke or a tease.” Hazarika worked for Citigroup for 15 years, starting in India in 1994 before moving to Singapore in 2002, the court papers showed. He joined Deutsche Bank as the Singapore-based head of corporate flow sales for Asia, excluding Japan, from Citigroup, where he was Asia sales head of transactional foreign exchange, Deutsche Bank said in a Dec. 1 statement. Citigroup’s Singapore-based spokesman Adam Rahman declined to comment, as did Deutsche Bank’s Mark Bennewith . Hazarika couldn’t immediately be reached for comment. ‘Intimate Knowledge’ Hazarika had access and “intimate knowledge” of confidential information, including customer details and business strategies, Citigroup said in its court filing. The bank said it stands to “lose its competitive edge” if the information leaks out. Hazarika’s “extensive experience” in transaction banking and foreign exchange will help Deutsche Bank as it increasingly focuses on Asia, Daniel Mamadou , co-head of DCM and Corporate Coverage for Asia, excluding Japan, said in the Dec. 1 statement. There was “nothing sinister” in the e-mails Hazarika sent to himself nor did the clients’ list sent to Deutsche Bank contain privileged banking information, his court filing shows. E-mails sent to the personal account were to facilitate working after office hours, Hazarika said in his affidavit. “In my mind, I had done nothing wrong,” Hazarika said in the papers. “The e-mails I forwarded to my personal e-mail account would not have caused the plaintiff any damage tomorrow, or the day after or at any time in the future.” Citigroup is represented by Drew & Napier LLC and Tan Rajah & Cheah is acting for Hazarika. The case is Citicorp Investment Bank (Singapore) Ltd. v Gautam Iswar Hazarika S1008/2009 in the Singapore High Court. To contact the reporter on this story: Andrea Tan in Singapore at atan17@bloomberg.net

Read the full article →

David Fiderer: Hard Evidence of Goldman’s Corrupt Intent and the Myth of the Sophisticated Investor

April 23, 2010

Many is the time I would review a write-up of a new deal and scribble in the margins, “Get to the bleeping point!” Unless you can articulate, up front, exactly what assets we would be lending against, and what circumstances would cause us to lose money (i.e. a quick-and-dirty breakeven analysis), you don’t really know what you’re talking about. And if you don’t have a good grasp of that issue, everything else you have to say is superfluous, a waste of time. This lack of common sense is pervasive, extending far beyond the financial services industry. (When, over the last seven years, have you ever heard a journalist ask, “How many troops do we have to replace those currently deployed in Iraq?”) In certain markets, most notably, CDOs, this lack of common sense was institutionalized. It’s evident in the deal book for Abacus 2007 AC-1 , at the center of the S.E.C.’s case against Goldman. What risks are investors assuming? The presentation doesn’t say. There’s a reference portfolio of 90 subprime mortgage bonds, on pages 55 and 56, which ostensibly would be insured via credit default swaps for the benefit of Goldman. But, as the small print says, “Goldman Sachs neither represents nor provides any assurances that the actual Reference Portfolio on the Closing Date or any future date will have the same characteristics as represented above.” According to my bias, everything else in the 66-page presentation is superfluous. And the real reference portfolio for Abacus 2001 AC-1 remains, to my knowledge at this point in time, hidden from public view. But if we assume that no one pulled a bait-and-switch, then the evidence of Goldman’s corrupt intent was always hiding in plain sight. Eyeballing the list of 90 subprime reference obligations, I happened to recognize a few that were notorious. J.P. Morgan Mortgage Acquisition Corp. 2006-FRE1 (JPMAC 2006-FRE1) was a billion-dollar subprime bond that imploded right away. About 13% of its loans were in foreclosure (either in the foreclosure process or as real estate owned, known as REO) as of April 26, 2007, when Abacus 2007 AC-1 closed. Because JPMAC 2006-FRE1 had such a high level of serious delinquencies at that time, no cash flow could be could be applied to any principal repayment for 10 of the 11 tranches that were senior to the BBB tranche, which Goldman shorted. It was obvious that BBB tranche, in the bottom 7% of the capital structure, would default. Goldman wasn’t assuming any kind of risk at all. There was virtual certainty that it would collect on the credit default swap. The same certainty applied to Argent Securities Trust Series 2006-W1 , which had a 10% foreclosure rate, to Morgan Stanley Abs Capital I Inc. Trust 2006-WMC2, which had an 8% foreclosure rate, and to Structured Asset Investment Loan Trust 2006-4 , which also had an 8% foreclosure rate. Each of those deals had already tripped up the delinquency trigger in its respective cash flow waterfall structure. In other words, there really wasn’t any doubt that Goldman would collect on its credit default swaps. These are just a couple of high profile deals that I happened to recognize. They may not be representative of the actual overall portfolio. But common sense tells me all I need to know. This deal was designed to provide a windfall to Goldman at the expense of some unwitting suckers. Goldman has asserted that the portfolio selection did not matter, that all subprime bonds of that 2006 vintage performed badly. Exactly. As explained here previously, the real estate bubble concealed a multitude of sins. In 2005, people who could not afford their mortgages would still sell their homes and recover some equity. Home flipping schemes were profitable, and promptly paid off the loans. But when home appreciation stopped in 2006, those same types of borrowers, who had lost their equity, were walking away handing over the keys to lenders. Goldman and John Paulson saw the spike in delinquencies and figured out what was going on, which was why they were aggressively shorting those deals. All this gets back to the myth of the sophisticated investor. The reference portfolio of credit default swaps was static, with no substitutions or reinvestments allowed. So after the deal closed, it didn’t matter whether the investment manager were a subsidiary of ABN Amro or two guys with a Bloomberg terminal. Pre-closing, the most important question was: How likely is it that Goldman will collect on its swaps? The motivations of ACA Management, the nominal Portfolio Selection Agent, were not all that relevant. But the deal book clearly demonstrates Goldman’s intent to distract attention away from the underlying substance of the deal. In other Goldman deals, notably Anderson Mezzanine Funding 2007 , Abacus 2006-13 and Abacus 2006-17 , the opportunities for abusive self-dealing were conspicuous. Abacus 2007 AC-1 is clearly organized to seduce investors with an illusory sense of comfort, that ACA Management, an independent third party and subsidiary of a global bank, would offset Goldman’s motivation to shaft investors. The irony, of course, is that Goldman worked in tandem with John Paulson to minimize any possibility that investors escape unharmed. Still, from looking at ACA Management’s organization chart and its staff biographies, I never would have expected that they could not have known, as of the CDO’s closing date on April 26, 2007, that Goldman’s windfall was a sure thing. They must have reviewed the current performance reports on 90 different bonds. How could they miss it? Somebody at ACA was afflicted with a pretty big case of willful blindness.

Read the full article →

Lehman Examiner Says SEC Knew Firm Was Violating Own Risk-Management Rules

April 19, 2010

By Linda Sandler April 19 (Bloomberg) — Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. violated its own risk-management rules with the knowledge and acquiescence of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, bankruptcy examiner Anton Valukas said. To contact the reporter on this story: Linda Sandler in New York at lsandler@bloomberg.net

Read the full article →

Ukraine Accord to Relinquish Uranium Gives Obama First Result from Summit

April 13, 2010

By Viola Gienger and Kate Andersen Brower April 13 (Bloomberg) — Ukraine’s agreement to relinquish its entire stockpile of highly enriched uranium gave President Barack Obama the first concrete result for a summit he convened on securing the world’s atomic material. Under the terms of the accord, Ukraine will dispose of roughly 90 kilograms of the uranium, “enough to construct several nuclear weapons,” and convert nuclear research reactors to use lower grade fuel, White House press secretary Robert Gibbs said. The move was announced yesterday after Obama met with Ukraine’s President Viktor Yanukovych , their first face-to-face discussion since Yanukovych took office in February. “I think that at the end of this we’re going to see some very specific concrete action that each nation is taking that will make the world a little bit safer,” Obama said after he wrapped up a series of individual meetings with some of the leaders and representatives of nations in Washington for the summit. Obama’s stated goal for the event is a plan of action for locking down global nuclear stockpiles within four years to prevent al-Qaeda or other terrorist groups from getting the material through theft or illicit sales to fabricate a weapon. The United Nations atomic energy agency has documented 18 cases of theft or loss of highly enriched uranium or plutonium, not counting incidents that individual countries haven’t confirmed, according to Matthew Bunn , an associate professor at Harvard University who once worked as an adviser on U.S. nuclear controls. Al-Qaeda’s Interest “Al-Qaeda has been engaged in the effort to acquire a nuclear weapon for over 15 years, and its interest remains strong today,” John Brennan , Obama’s adviser on counterterrorism and homeland security, said at a briefing. In another step toward eliminating such material, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov are scheduled to sign a deal today in which each side agrees to dispose of 34,000 metric tons of weapons-grade plutonium, enough material for about 17,000 nuclear weapons. “These are both very significant measures and exactly the kind of thing that we hoped would be stimulated by holding this conference,” said Gareth Evans , a former Australian foreign minister who is co-chairman of the International Commission on Nuclear non-Proliferation and Disarmament . “It was a matter of this conference actually being the occasion to get people to the line on very specific commitments.” The U.S. and Russia’s Plutonium Management and Disposition Agreement was agreed to in principle by then-Presidents Bill Clinton and Vladimir Putin in June 2000. Disputes between the two governments over protocols to implement the accord delayed action until now. Extended Negotiations The agreement with Ukraine also is the result of years of negotiations. “This is something that the United States has tried to make happen for more than 10 years,” Gibbs said. The U.S. will provide some technical and financial assistance to dispose of Ukraine’s stockpiles by 2012, the date of the next nuclear security summit, Gibbs said. Canada’s Prime Minister Stephen Harper , who is in Washington for the summit, separately announced his country will send spent highly enriched uranium to the U.S. for processing to make it unusable for a weapon. Evans said he expects the communiqué from the summit to commit each country to take steps toward securing stockpiles and include support for ratifying various international agreements that have been stalled. Issues Unresolved Neither the summit nor the resulting statement will deal with radiological materials used for so-called dirty bombs, nor the disputed issue of recycling fuel already used in reactors for further use, he said.     “I think we all do anticipate that the summit will leave a substantial amount of unfinished business that will need strong, continued attention,” Evans said. Two potentially high-risk sources of illicit nuclear materials, Iran and North Korea, weren’t invited to the summit and aren’t specifically part of the agenda.     While Iran isn’t known to have succeeded in enriching uranium to weapons grade, its suspected support for militant groups raises the specter that it ultimately also might slip material to terrorist allies, said Robert Gallucci , a former U.S. special envoy on the spread of missiles and nuclear weapons. North Korea     In North Korea, Kim Jong-Il’s government has plutonium and said last year that it has almost succeeded in developing highly enriched uranium.     “We should not limit our concern about the nuclear programs in Iran and North Korea to their acquisition of nuclear weapons,” said Gallucci, now president of the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation , which supports projects to reduce the risk of nuclear weapons.     Tracing material back to its source may be difficult and even tracking movement of nuclear supplies across the globe presents challenges, Gallucci said. He cited North Korea’s suspected role in helping Syria construct a nuclear reactor that the Israelis bombed in September 2007.     “To the best of my knowledge, the United States government was surprised to learn that the North Koreans were building a plutonium-production reactor in Syria,” Gallucci said. “That tells me that, if we are looking for relatively small amounts of material, we should not expect to catch that movement.” To contact the reporters on this story: Viola Gienger in Washington at vgienger@bloomberg.net ; Kate Andersen Brower in Washington at Kandersen7@bloomberg.net .

Read the full article →

China’s Xi Courted by Australia’s Richest Man as World Awaits Yuan Move

April 11, 2010

By Bloomberg News April 12 (Bloomberg) — Andrew Forrest , chief executive officer of Fortescue Metals Group , knows how to pay respect to his biggest customer: he made a 90-degree bow to “China” at an April 9 company party on the tropical island of Hainan. The next day, it was time to honor his host at the Boao Forum for Asia, which his company helped sponsor. He spoke on a panel after China’s Vice President Xi Jinping , a likely successor to President Hu Jintao . “The detail, the gracious calm, to which you conveyed your opinions last night to me gave me great confidence in the future of your country,” said Forrest, whose stake in the Perth-based iron ore exporter makes him Australia’s richest man. China’s role in heading the global economic recovery, underscored by a 66 percent surge in March imports , has the world looking to it for leadership and made for longer receiving lines of executives keen to bolster sales to the nation. As Forrest and business leaders including Saudi Basic Industries Corp. Chief Executive Officer Mohamed al-Mady praised Xi, bankers worldwide waited to see if China would revalue its currency as U.S. lawmakers ramped up criticism. “The world is listening more carefully to what China says,” Zhou Xiaochuan , governor of China’s central bank, told a panel at China’s version of the World Economic Forum in Davos. “That’s certainly a good thing, but also puts pressure” on China’s leaders. ‘Great’ Leader Xi, keynote speaker at the forum that ended yesterday, was elevated in 2007 to the ruling nine-man Politburo Standing Committee and named vice president in 2008. Hu, due to step down from his role as Communist Party leader in 2012, was vice president before assuming the top leadership positions beginning in 2002. “He is a great leader,” said al-Mady, who met Xi on April 9 in Boao. “He came through the ranks and he is very impressive in talking to us about China’s future.” Al-Mady’s Riyadh-based company, the world’s biggest petrochemical maker, is working with China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. to build a petrochemical complex in the northern Chinese port city of Tianjin. China buys more of its oil from Saudi Arabia than any other country, Chinese customs figures show. Chinese economic growth accelerated to 10.7 percent in the fourth quarter. The nation accounted for a third of global economic growth in 2008, according to the International Monetary Fund. China is the world’s biggest consumer of iron ore, automobiles and mobile phones. ‘Astonishing’ Oversight “It would be astonishing if people didn’t sit up and take notice,” said Leon Brittan , vice chairman of UBS Investment Bank and former European Union trade commissioner. Fortescue’s sales to Chinese customers were $1.15 billion in the last six months of 2009, or 97 percent of total revenue, according to company filings. Forbes Magazine last month named Forrest, who owns 31 percent of Fortescue , Australia’s richest man with a fortune of $4.1 billion. Xi in Boao also held meetings with former U.S. Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson and Robert Hormats , the U.S. undersecretary of state for economic affairs, as global financial markets waited for a possible revaluation of the yuan. The Chinese currency has been pegged to about 6.83 to one U.S. dollar since July 2008. U.S. lawmakers have urged President Barack Obama to label China a currency manipulator and called on the administration to use the threat of trade sanctions to force an end to the peg that they say gives Chinese exporters an unfair advantage. Boosting Consumption In his April 10 speech, Xi didn’t talk about the yuan and focused instead on climate change and China’s economy. “We must develop the economy mainly by relying on the domestic market and attach great importance to domestic demand, especially consumption demand, in driving economic development,” Xi said on the same day China posted its first trade deficit in six years. China’s Ministry of Commerce said that the yuan’s exchange rate is not the decisive factor in the trade balance, which swung to a $7.24 billion shortfall in March. Hormats said in an interview that no conclusions could be drawn from a single month’s data. During his April 9 meeting with Xi, Hormats discussed the importance of the economic and political relationship between China and the U.S. , he said. Xi has a “very positive vision” of cooperation between the two nations, the U.S. official said. “He had some very positive ideas about the importance of the American relationship,” Hormats said, without elaborating. “I very much enjoyed meeting him as a person and have great respect for his knowledge and his understanding of the issues.” U.S. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner visited Beijing on April 8, meeting with Vice Premier Wang Qishan . Hu is set to arrive in Washington today for a summit on nuclear security and will also have a meeting with President Barack Obama . “The U.S. concerns are significant so this needs to be managed in a way that there is continual progress because this getting out of hand is in no one’s interest,” Paulson told panelists at Boao. — Michael Forsythe , Stephen Engle , Xiao Yu, Yidi Zhao, Wang Ying, Christine Hah, Wei Du. Editors: John Liu , Paul Panckhurst. To contact Bloomberg staff on this story: Michael Forsythe in Beijing at +86-10-6649-7580 or mforsythe@bloomberg.net

Read the full article →

China Said to Halt Import Permits for Argentina Soybean Oil as Rift Grows

April 11, 2010

By Bloomberg News April 11 (Bloomberg) — China stopped giving import permits for soybean oil from Argentina as a trade rift between the two nations widens, four executives familiar with the matter said. The Ministry of Commerce’s computer system for processing permit applications isn’t functioning and the ministry didn’t say when it would be operational, said the people, who declined to be named because they’re not authorized to speak publicly. China is the world’s biggest soybean oil buyer. The central government assumed full control for Argentine soybean oil imports from the provinces from April 1. The move was in response to Argentina’s anti-dumping investigations on Chinese goods ranging from steel pipes to textiles, according to a Chinese state-backed trade group. An Argentine delegation visiting Beijing this week failed to reach agreement on the matter as China’s government said the import issues are related to oil quality, the people said. China is likely to maintain its curbs in the near term, the executives said. The government isn’t restricting Argentine soybean oil imports and the decision to centralize import permit management is to further monitor Argentine oil, a press official at the commerce ministry, who asked not to be named, said in a telephone interview yesterday. A separate official at the ministry denied the government had stopped accepting import permit applications, in an interview in Beijing today. He said to his knowledge the online system is still working and China’s general position on Argentine soy hasn’t changed, while declining to be identified. The Argentine embassy was closed and unable to be contacted by phone. Cargo Canceled The move comes as domestic rapeseed crops are about to be harvested and imports of soybeans are projected to reach a record, so the China vegetable oil market is well supplied, the executives said. China and Argentina may be able to resolve the dispute, Cheng Guoqiang , deputy head of the State Council’s Development & Research Center, said at a conference today in Beijing. A state-owned company canceled one Argentine cargo this week, weighing about 10,000 tons, one of the executives said. Two were redirected to other countries because buyers were concerned they would be rejected on arriving in China, he said. Two shipments are expected to arrive in China this month after they departed Argentina before the announcement on March 31, and traders are waiting to see how those cargoes are handled by the authorities, the people said. Traders will have to rework contracts that have already been signed with Argentine suppliers, one executive said. Argentina is China’s biggest supplier of soybean oil and China is the Latin American nation’s biggest buyer. The government of Argentina collected $600 million in export taxes on the cooking oil sold to China, two of the people said. — William Bi , with assistance from Li Yanping . Editors: Tom Kohn , Garfield Reynolds . To contact the Bloomberg News staff on this story: William Bi in Beijing at wbi@bloomberg.net

Read the full article →

Iranian Student With $750 Turns Billionaire Made by Islamic Art

March 30, 2010

By William Green March 30 (Bloomberg) — Nasser David Khalili stands in an exhibition hall in St. Petersburg’s Winter Palace, gazing at an 18th-century painted enamel of flowers that’s one of 25,000 works of art he owns. “I’d have paid anything for it,” he says, appraising this miniature by Frenchman Philippe Parpette. “There’s no way I’d have let anybody else buy it.” Khalili, 64, an Iranian-born billionaire who lives in London, has come to Russia to unveil his fifth art collection: On this overcast December afternoon, 320 of his 1,200 enamel treasures will go on display at the State Hermitage Museum, home to the collection of Catherine the Great, Bloomberg Markets magazine reports in its May issue. Having flown in on a chartered plane, Khalili is relishing a private preview, peering through tinted eyeglasses at such possessions as a gilded clock with matching candelabras that once adorned the home of U.S. railroad tycoon William Vanderbilt. Khalili, who says he has a photographic memory, recalls paying $16,500 for these three pieces 34 years ago. He estimates that they’d now cost $600,000. In all, Khalili says the enamels he has lent the museum are insured for more than 100 million pounds ($150 million). Even so, they are a trifle compared with the obsession that’s consumed him for four decades: his 20,000 pieces of Islamic art. “His collection is certainly the best in private hands,” says Edward Gibbs , Sotheby’s London-based head of Middle Eastern art. “He is the man who has everything. He’s come to define the market.” Signs of Revival Khalili is revealing his latest collection just as the $43 billion global art market is showing signs of reviving — with an Alberto Giacometti sculpture selling for a record 65 million pounds in February to a buyer later identified by dealers as London-based billionaire Lily Safra . In the Islamic art world, prices for the best pieces have been buoyed by a new generation of Middle Eastern buyers, including museums in Qatar and Abu Dhabi. “There’s fierce competition for anything unique, rare, beautiful or important,” Gibbs says, noting that an Islamic textile Sotheby’s estimated would fetch $250,000 to $350,000 in a March 2009 auction went to Qatar’s Museum of Islamic Art for $3.4 million. The limited supply in this niche within the art market has made Khalili’s collection all the more precious, says Claire Penhallurick , an Islamic art consultant for Bonhams auction house. She says it’s impossible to guess what his entire collection is worth. “How could you value something that’s unique and irreplaceable?” Penhallurick says. “If you had all the money in the world, you couldn’t assemble his collection now.” Shrouded in Secrets When an exhibition of 471 of Khalili’s Islamic pieces opened at the Institut du Monde Arabe in Paris in October, they alone were insured for almost 600 million pounds. The story behind how Khalili built his fortune has long been shrouded in secrets. As a property developer, he shunned publicity and didn’t slap his name on buildings or the company that is his main investment vehicle. He has also operated under the radar when buying art. “During the collecting, I don’t say anything,” Khalili says. “When it’s done, then I speak.” His elusiveness has fueled much speculation, often revolving around how he financed his collecting. Khalili, who left Iran in 1967 with $750, says he’s since spent $650 million on art. London’s Sunday Times, which estimated his fortune at 5.8 billion pounds in 2007, gave up guessing his worth the following year and removed him from its annual rich list . Top Collector Khalili, whose works are held in a family trust, says he used subterfuge to amass his Islamic collection, pretending for several years to be an art dealer so he could acquire pieces at wholesale prices. While his stealth has often obscured the scale of his buying, the magazine ARTnews says Khalili is one of Britain’s top collectors, along with Safra and private museum owner Charles Saatchi . The Iranian says he’s aware of whispers within the art trade that he grew rich buying Islamic works for Brunei’s Sultan Hassanal Bolkiah . Sitting in his office in London’s Mayfair neighborhood, where the treasures on display include an 8th- century bronze camel and a 7,000-year-old stone sculpture, Khalili beats his chest with his hand when asked about the rumors. “I didn’t buy anything for anybody. Nobody, right?” he says. “I bought for myself. This is all bulls—, all right?” The questions surrounding Khalili stem in part from his emergence in the 1980s as a trailblazer in Islamic collecting. Press Speculation “There was this sudden transformation,” says William Robinson, director of Islamic art at Christie’s International. “In the late 1980s he was the No. 1 buyer.” Robinson and others thought he was buying as the exclusive agent for a powerful client. “It was assumed that the Sultan of Brunei was behind it,” Robinson says. “I really don’t know.” Brunei’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs didn’t respond to requests for comment. Britain’s press also fueled speculation about the source of Khalili’s riches. “He spends on a scale no art collector has done before,” London’s Independent wrote in 1994. “Yet no one knows where his money comes from. … (Khalili) vehemently denies the suggestion that he has been secretly investing the sultan’s money rather than his own.” Khalili says he met the Sultan of Brunei around 1984, after the U.K.’s Foreign Office asked him to advise the monarch on creating an Islamic gallery at the Brunei Museum. Sultan’s Artworks “He had about 10,000 pieces,” Khalili says. “I chose about 1,000 pieces and said, ‘Throw the rest away. They’re junk.’” As a favor, he says, he selected several items for the Sultan to buy at auction and the Khalili family trust sold him a dozen pieces from its Islamic collection, including Qurans, metalwork and textiles, for about 4 million pounds. Khalili dismisses rumors that he sold art to the Sultan at inflated prices, pointing out that he later convinced him to donate 10 million pounds to the University of London for an Islamic gallery. “If you rip somebody off, would they turn around and give you 10 million pounds to build a gallery?” he asks. It’s now obvious he was buying for himself, Khalili says, since his Islamic collection is cataloged in 19 books written by an army of scholars he has hired to document its provenance and authenticity. Khalili, who has also built collections of Japanese Meiji art, Spanish metalwork and Swedish textiles since 1975, says the value of his artworks is irrelevant, because he will never sell them. Offer to Britain “All five collections are priceless: 2 billion pounds, 3 billion pounds, 4 billion pounds, it doesn’t make any difference,” he says. “These collections cannot be replaced.” His Islamic treasures include a 14th-century Iranian world history by Rashid al-Din Fadlallah, which he says cost him 12 million pounds in 1990. “It’s one of the greatest illustrated manuscripts in the world,” says Tim Stanley, senior curator for the Middle East at London’s Victoria & Albert Museum . Khalili, who holds both U.S. and U.K. passports, offered to lend his Islamic collection to the British nation in 1992 if the government provided a museum to house it. Khalili says he stipulated that the loan would become a gift after 15 years if the collection was exhibited to his satisfaction; if not, he could take it back. Outsider in London “The offer to the British government was a really terrible one,” says Anna Somers Cocks , editor-in-chief of the London- based monthly Art Newspaper, because of this risk. After months with no response, Khalili abandoned the plan. Still lacking a permanent home, most of his artworks are stored in warehouses in London and Geneva. Michael Franses, a U.K.-based retired dealer in rare carpets who’s known Khalili since the 1970s, says this rebuff reflected Khalili’s outsider status in his adopted country. “The British establishment was very closed,” Franses says. “I don’t think people trusted him because he was Iranian and strange and different.” That setback is a distant memory as Khalili strides through the Hermitage, musing on how far he’s come since leaving Iran. His artworks have been showcased by 40 museums, including the Victoria & Albert and New York’s Metropolitan Museum of Art. Khalili also prides himself on the honors he has won for his philanthropy. An observant Jew who says he avoids discussions of politics, Khalili co-founded the Maimonides Foundation in 1995 to foster dialogue between Jews and Muslims through sports, cultural events and education. He also endowed a research center for Middle Eastern culture at the University of Oxford. ‘I’m Self-Made’ In recognition of Khalili’s interfaith work, Pope Benedict XVI anointed him last year as a Knight Commander of the Pontifical Equestrian Order of St. Sylvester. “I’m self-made. I’ve done it all on my own,” says Khalili, whose 14-page resume is headlined: “Scholar, Benefactor and Collector.” Khalili sees no contradiction in being Jewish and owning an Islamic collection. “I fell in love with it because it was the most beautiful and diverse art,” he says. In 2005, at the launch party for Khalili’s book The Timeline History of Islamic Art and Architecture, Iran’s then- ambassador to London, Seyed Mohammad Hossein Adeli, hailed him as “an ambassador for the culture of Islam.” First Treasure Khalili’s journey to the top of the art world began in Iran on Dec. 18, 1945. The fourth of five children, he grew up in Tehran. His mother counseled divorced women. His father — like his father before him — visited homes to acquire artworks he could sell for a few dollars profit. As a child, Khalili tagged along when his father traded art, once joining him at the home of a former education minister with a collection of pen boxes. The 12-year-old yeshiva student was enraptured by a lacquer pen box painted with 800 men and horses, each one different. Khalili recalls that when he rhapsodized about the box, the owner’s eyes filled with tears. “He turned round to my dad and said, ‘I’m not selling this to you. I’m giving this to your son,’” Khalili says. He still has the pen box in his Islamic collection. “So the first piece I didn’t buy; I was given,” he says. Art Mentor After high school, Khalili did national service, training as an army medic. At 22, he left Iran for New York, where he worked at a Howard Johnson’s restaurant while studying at Queens College, part of New York’s public education system. One evening, as Khalili sipped cream to soothe an ulcer, the restaurant manager scolded him for taking it without permission. Khalili threw his waiter’s jacket at his boss and decided he’d trade art to pay his school fees. At an auction of Russian enamels months later, Khalili noticed the main bidder was Alan Hartman, whose family ran a Manhattan antiques store. Khalili borrowed several enamels from Hartman on consignment. He says he sold them that evening for a $26,000 profit to Iranian collectors he knew on Long Island, where many wealthy Iranians were settling. (Khalili’s four siblings have since moved there.) Hartman, now 80, says he wanted to help because Khalili was a Jewish immigrant struggling to build a new life. “We felt sorry for him,” he says. “Alan and I did a hell of a lot after that,” Khalili says. “In two years, I was a millionaire.” Friends say it was typical of Khalili that he’d launched himself by charming a stranger into lending him art. “He has a way of winning people over,” says Sotheby’s Gibbs. Tactile Billionaire In person, Khalili exudes warmth: Meeting someone for the first time, he’s liable to introduce himself with a hug. He stands close to people, resting his hand on their arm, shoulder or back. Before graduating from Queens in 1974 with a bachelor’s degree in computer sciences, Khalili was already amassing his own collection. “I used to buy a group of objects — let’s say, 10 objects for $100,000 — keep 3 or 4 of the best aside and sell the rest for $250,000,” he says. “I used my knowledge to create money to finance my dream.” In 1978, Khalili married Marion Easton, an Englishwoman he’d met while buying jewelry from her in a London antique store, and they settled in the U.K. capital. They have three sons: Daniel, 28, a jewelry designer, and twins Benjamin and Raphael, 25, who invest family money in startups such as PlayPit Games Ltd., an online entertainment company. Decoy Shop In addition to dealing art, Khalili says he began in the late 1970s to buy commercial properties in the U.K., France, Portugal and Spain. “As he made money with property, he put it into art,” says Franses, the retired carpet dealer. “He was only ever interested in the art.” Khalili approached him whenever he had cash to spare, buying such rarities as two 16th-century rugs that Franses says would now cost 2 million pounds each. Khalili deployed misdirection to his advantage when he opened an Islamic art store in London in 1978. For three years, Khalili says he used the shop as a ruse to obtain dealers’ prices. “I never sold anything there; I used that place as a decoy and bought unbelievable stuff,” he says. “His timing was impeccable,” says Penhallurick. Islamic art was such a backwater that dedicated Islamic auctions didn’t begin until the 1970s. Khalili — whose main rivals at the time included the Kuwaiti royal family and the David Collection , owned by a Danish foundation — says many pieces he acquired then would now cost 10 to 50 times more. Beautiful and Overlooked “Anything that is beautiful and was overlooked, I bought,” says Khalili, who received a Ph.D. in Islamic lacquer at the University of London in 1988. By the mid-1980s, Khalili says, his purchases were partly funded by venture capital investments that he declines to name. He says he made 30 times his money off shares he had bought in the late 1970s in a company developing technology to treat tumors. In 1987, he says he pocketed $15 million from the sale of a private company that made indigestion pills. Khalili says he stopped trading art around 1980 and bankrolled his collecting primarily with profits from property. In a typical deal, he says, he paid 32.5 million pounds in 1992 for Cameron Toll, an Edinburgh shopping mall, selling it two years later for 55 million pounds as the market revived. Public records show Khalili has owned various private property companies. Property Development His main vehicle, Favermead Ltd., was incorporated in the U.K. in 1992 and sold 97 million pounds of property in 1995 alone, according to the company’s financial statements. “Business is the least of my pride,” Khalili says. “Compared to collecting, it’s a piece of cake.” Still, he currently owns a 60,000-square-foot (5,574- square-meter) business park in Exeter, England; a 32,000-square- foot building in Mayfair; and a site in central London where he plans to build a 320,000-square-foot, 13-story office tower when the real estate market recovers. “If he starts building in the next 12 months, it’ll be very good timing as there’s very little available in the market,” says Gerald Ronson , CEO of London-based developer Heron International , which also bid for the central London site. Mayfair Mansion One personal property venture proved more problematic. In 1993, Khalili began combining two buildings in Kensington that once housed the Russian and Egyptian embassies into a 55,000-square-foot home. Khalili says he spent 90 million pounds on the house, including 45 million pounds on the refurbishment. He employed 400 craftsmen for 4 years, installing 3,200 square meters of marble, a Turkish bath and underground parking for 20 cars. Marion Khalili says she refused to move in, deeming the house too palatial. In 2001, Khalili unloaded the property for 50 million pounds to Formula One tycoon Bernie Ecclestone , who sold it to steel magnate Lakshmi Mittal for 57 million pounds in 2004, according to public records. Khalili now lives instead in a seven-story Edwardian mansion in Mayfair. These days, Khalili says, his buying of Islamic art has slowed. With competition intensifying, he’s turned his attention elsewhere. One afternoon in late February, he reveals that he’s already begun his sixth collection. This time, Khalili says, he’s acquired an existing trove of nearly 200 pieces, to which he’ll add more treasures. And the collection’s theme? “I’m not telling you,” Khalili says with a smile. With that, he draws a veil on the next chapter in the improbable story of the Iranian yeshiva student who became the world’s leading private collector of Islamic art. To contact the reporter on this story: William Green in London at wgreen6@bloomberg.net .

Read the full article →

Marshall Goldsmith: A Journey into Personality Self-Discovery

March 28, 2010

Career Choices Are Life Choices For the typical career professional, your daily pursuits are much more than just having a job and paying the bills. Remember the old adage about whether you “eat to live or live to eat”? We could easily compose a similar challenge about work: Do you “work to live or live to work”? Even based on the sheer number of hours we spend at work, this is an important consideration. Assuming an eight-hour day and seven hours of sleep at night, approximately one-third of our waking hours are spent at work. For many professionals, especially physicians, this percentage is probably closer to one-half of their waking hours! That’s a huge chunk of your life. This puts into perspective the significant impact our career choices can have on how we view our lives. Understanding Culture and Language Our language often betrays us. Notice that in the opening paragraph I used the word “spend,” as in “the time I spend at work.” This is how many people describe their work, and it doesn’t sound like a highly satisfying pursuit! This observation led me to create an exercise, which I have conducted with leaders regarding how they view their jobs. They are given three choices for assessing the content of their work. Please try this yourself. As I describe each of the three categories, estimate the percentage of your job that falls into each category. The first category is “play.” This is job content that is fun and what you would tend to do regardless of whether or not you were compensated for it. We have all seen people readily agree to do a task that was beyond the job description. Why? Because it was a task they viewed as fun, as an outlet for untapped creativity or a channel for self-actualization. If I tell myself, “I’m going to play,” there is no resistance or creative avoidance. We all like to play. The second category is “work.” This is job content that is not play. It’s work. This is activity that, although not fun, you would agree to do for reasonable compensation. Illustration: My father was a mechanic and ran a DX gas station in Valley Station, Kentucky. He lived during a time when people might barter for goods if they didn’t have the money to pay for them. A man asked my father, “I need my car repaired. Do you want to do it?” My father might reply, “No, I don’t want to do it. I don’t have any fun repairing cars. However, I will do it for reasonable compensation, say a 100 pounds of potatoes from your garden.” I can tell myself, “I’m going to work,” and have a reasonably high level of commitment to follow through with this objective. The third category is “misery.” Job content in this category is not only not play, but there is no compensation imaginable to make it pleasurable. I tell myself, “I’m about to do something that I don’t want to do and I’ll be miserable doing it.” I will be wonderfully creative in finding every reason to avoid that activity. How do you see the composition of your professional experience concerning activities that are categorized as play, work, and misery? Here are the typical survey results among professionals: 15 percent of what professionals do is considered play; 75 percent of what professionals do is considered work; 10 percent of what professionals do is considered misery. Assessing Instinct and Life Choices Life should be rampant with fun. I believe that one of your life goals should be to move yourself into more activities that are fun and away from activities that bring you misery. The initial step in toward fun is to identify those activities that constitute “play.” To do so, first clarify your natural tendencies for interacting with your world in order to make better life choices. There are personal assessments that promote this aspect of self-discovery. For example, completing the self-paced “Extended DISC” assessment can aid you in making better life and career choices as well as in determining how to be more effective in your current roles. Such an assessment can help you understand your intrinsic personality traits and behavioral tendencies that coalesce in the following categories: Results-oriented, take charge, make-it-happen People-focused, extroverted Loyal, task-focused, team-player Quality-focused, detail-oriented, organizer Certain specialties may call for different aspects of these four personality dimensions. For example, an accountant may require more of the task/quality focus and attention to detail and procedure where a sales person may be more successful in the people-focus and extroverted category. A person who has differing natural tendencies may need to moderate behavior in order to work effectively in this specialty and be successful. This is not to suggest that someone with differing natural tendencies couldn’t be successful in that role–only that adaptation may be necessary for professional effectiveness and personal satisfaction. When you have to adapt yourself to fit a role, you may not be miserable, but it will likely be hard work. For this reason, it’s best to choose roles that match your personality and behavioral styles. When you are in a role that has some mismatches, plan for some conscious moderation to enhance working relationships and performance. Understanding Your Mojo There is another concept that can have significant impact on your day-to-day energy and performance. Also, it can promote a greater sense of “ownership” and job satisfaction. Ask yourself: “Given a set of circumstances, how can I make the situation not only more palatable, but how can I transform it by my ‘positive spirit’?” This is referred to as “mojo”–literally, a type of magic charm. For purposes of discussion, it can be regarded as “that positive spirit toward one’s activities that originates from the inside and radiates to the outside.” Your mojo is not fixed or limited in quantity at birth such that “when it’s gone, it’s gone.” It is renewable and each person governs how it gets renewed — and it changes with different activities and circumstances over time. The goal in renewing mojo is two-fold: First, choose activities that more naturally maximize it, and, second, generate as much of it as possible regardless of the activity. On the inside, high mojo results in personal excitement about the activity in which you are engaged at the moment. As it radiates to the outside, which it will, you will experience spreading positive energy to everyone around you. What You Bring to Work The first aspect investigates what you bring to a certain activity in personal or professional pursuits. This includes enthusiasm and energy, knowledge and “know-how”, skills, confidence, genuineness, and authenticity. Obviously, you bring differing amounts of these attributes depending on the activity. For some activities, you might bring high amounts of several of these attributes, and for other activities you might bring lesser amounts. What You Gain from Work The second aspect deals with what a certain activity brings to you. An activity can bring both short-term and/or long-term returns. For the short-term, an activity can be stimulating and rewarding and promote personal happiness. In the long-term, an activity can provide meaning and help you to learn and grow. Overall, an activity can engender a sense that it was a valuable use of time, promoting feelings of gratefulness. As with your inputs, the short- and long-term returns differ by activity. Some activities might have either a short- or long-term impact, whereas other activities may bring both short- and long-term impact. Concluding Thoughts Ideally your day is filled with activities that score high on most of the above inputs and returns. Over time, if you know which activities bring you happiness and meaning and which don’t, the intent is to manage your life so that you do more of those activities which bring up your mojo and minimize or eliminate altogether those that don’t. But, life is not ideal. The reality is that we all have to do things we don’t like some times. However, we’re not stuck. Here are some quick suggestions for how you might engage, retain, or regain mo, even while you’re doing the most mundane activities. Validate that the activity must be done and/or must be done as you are currently doing it. If it is not a necessary task, stop it and focus on a high-mojo activity. Don’t assume that just because it’s being done that it’s important and must continue. On the second point, if you have options for changing it to any degree, see the next suggestion. Brainstorm ideas for reframing or redefining the activity to more closely align it with what reflects your positive spirit. That might increase the short- and/or long-term returns. If you can simply add a little fun to the activity, the short-term stimulation might be worth it. If you can learn something new or find a deeper meaning in the process, then you’ve gained long-term value. Identify actions for enriching what you bring to the activity. Perhaps training or coaching would enhance your knowledge or skills. That, in turn, could build greater self-confidence. Increased confidence could drive enthusiasm and create energy. Rehearse expectations from the activity. Perhaps the activity, though not presently stimulating, is providing a long-term opportunity for growth. Conversely, an activity may not offer any long-term meaning, but, in the present, really brings happiness and stimulation. The attendant value of an activity, either in the short- or long-term, may not be obvious. Have a talk with yourself and deliberately focus on the value proposition for you. Life is much too short to simply tolerate it. Continually pursue some aspect of self-discovery as we talked about earlier. Take responsibility for forging a new path that is a better fit with your personality make-up. If that seems unlikely, and that is the reality for most of us, then take responsibility for being more effective in your current situation. As simple as it may sound, by increasing your effectiveness, you can elicit a more positive response from others. Finally, take action to discover and enhance your own happiness and meaning–through new pursuits, by reframing current activities, by extending what you bring to the situation, or by finding hidden value. In so doing, you will experience more positive associations with others and a richer, more satisfying life in general.

Read the full article →

David Isenberg: AFRICA: The Mother of All PMC

March 22, 2010

With all the attention being paid to private military and security contractors working in Iraq and Afghanistan it is easy to forget they operate in other parts of the world. But it would be wrong to do so. While PMCs are to the best of my knowledge not, at least not yet, operating in the Arctic, they are just about everywhere else. And one region where they are increasingly prominent is Africa, the region most closely identified with the modern private security contractor. This is the region that produced the now disbanded Executive Outcomes, the most famous PMC in modern history. Just as Africa is the birthplace of humanity it is also the birthplace of the modern PMC. While EO no longer exists the use of PMC by the U.S. and commercial firms has steadily increased. One impetus for the growth of PMC there was the Pentagon’s October 2007 establishment of AFRICOM (United States African Command), the U.S. military’s most recent unified command. To its credit, unlike other unified commands, AFRICOM, responsible for military relations with 53 African nations, focuses on war-prevention, rather than war-fighting. But because the U.S. military deliberately chooses to keep a small military presence in Africa it must rely to a greater degree on private contractors. As Aviation Week reported on March 17: The prospect of a mass deployment of U.S. contractors is worrisome to more than a few observers outside of Africom. Contractors have generally performed creditably in Iraq and Afghanistan, but their presence raises issues pertaining to control of their activities, which authority–U.S. or local–has legal responsibility for them and, of course, their cost. Many observers argue that the money spent on contractors is excessive and would be better invested in local economies. But where Africom might not have the capacity to perform these missions across the continent (it has a staff of about 1,200 spread over 53 countries), the State Dept. is spending almost $100 million a year to pay military contractors to train local forces through its African Contingency Operations Training and Assistance program. In the Fiscal 2010 State-Foreign Operations Appropriations bill, the Obama administration is asking for $96.8 million in funding for the program, which, since 2005, has trained more than 77,000 from about two dozen African nations. But the program is not without critics. A June 2008 Government Accountability Office report found that the State Dept. has had trouble “assessing the proficiency of trained peacekeepers against standard skills taught in training and accounting for the activities of trained instructors.” It is not hard to find examples of PMC doing work for AFRICOM. In January the State Department awarded DynCorp International a task order for operations and maintenance support in Liberia, under the AFRICAP contract. AFRICAP is a State Dept. program that uses contractors to provide military training, perform advisory missions and provide logistical support and construction services for State’s programs across Africa. In September 2009, the department awarded a 5-year, multiple-award, indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity contract to three companies: PAE Government Services; DynCorp International and Protection Strategies Inc., with the ceiling for each coming in at $375 million. The task order, with a value of $5.2 million for the initial 6 month base period, has a potential total value of $20 million over two years if all options are exercised. Under the task order, DynCorp will provide operations and maintenance support for facilities of the Armed Forces of Liberia at Edward B. Kesselly Barracks and Camp Ware in Liberia. Services provided will include electrical power generation, water supply, waste disposal, and vehicle maintenance. In 2008 I noted that DynCorp has previously provided logistical support and training for peacekeepers in Liberia and Somalia. In Liberia DynCorp and PAE worked together in the Security Sector Reform program, funded by the State Department. DynCorp was contracted to provide basic facilities and basic training for the Armed Forces of Liberia, while PAE won the contract for building some bases, forming and structuring the AFL and its component units, and for providing specialized and advanced training, including mentoring the AFL’s fledgling officer and non-commissioned officer corps. DynCorp’s job was essentially to “recruit and make soldiers,” while PAE is employed to “mentor and develop” them into a fully operational force. MPRI has also provided training for the militaries of Benin, Ethiopia, Ghana, Kenya, Mali, Malawi, Nigeria, Rwanda and Senegal under the State Department’s African Contingency Operations and Assistance Program, (formerly the African Crisis Response Initiative), and separately provided training and analysis to the South African military. Northrop Grumman also operated under a $75 million contract to support the ACOAP program, which aimed to train 40,000 African peacekeepers over five years. KBR provided services to at least three bases in Djibouti, Kenya and Ethiopia used by the U.S. Combined Joint Task Force-Horn of Africa. Just last week NATO reported that in response to the African Union request for strategic airlift support to the African Union Mission in Somalia (AMISOM), the United States used DynCorp to conduct airlift missions under the NATO banner in support of the Ugandan troop rotations. The airlift, which commenced on 5 Mar 2010 and was completed on 16 Mar 2010, transported 1700 Ugandan troops from Uganda into Mogadishu and re-deploying 850 Ugandan troops out of Mogadishu. Back in January Gen William Ward, the head of AFRICOM, in an interview with Radio France said , that AFRICOM does not use PMC. But the AFRICOM public affairs office later clarified his statement to indicate that he referred only to security contractors. More importantly, State Department AFRICAP and ACOTA contracts do use security companies. While, to date, Western PMCs, are thought to have conducted themselves reasonably well and fulfilled their contracts competently they are still viewed by many as being on probation. Last year Eeben Barlow, who founded Executive Outcomes, wrote on his blog: A number of PMCs/PSCs are sponsored by Western governments who have motives that are not always obvious. These PMCs become their favoured companies to use – and they act on behalf of the sponsoring government’s foreign policy and also act as intelligence fronts. They are not there to help clients but rather to advance their government’s agendas – usually to the detriment of the client-government.

Read the full article →

Russia’s United Aircraft Chief Fyodorov Denies U.S. Air Force Tanker Bid

March 22, 2010

By Gopal Ratnam and Lyubov Pronina March 22 (Bloomberg) — Russia’s United Aircraft Corp. isn’t planning to bid for the Pentagon’s $35 billion Air Force aerial-refueling tanker program, Chief Executive Officer Alexei Fyodorov said, contradicting U.S. media reports. The Wall Street Journal reported March 19 that United Aircraft, the maker of Ilyushin transport planes, was preparing a bid to be announced as early as today. The Washington Post also wrote about the plan on March 20. “This is utter nonsense,” Fyodorov said in a subsequent telephone interview with Bloomberg News. “UAC is not planning to take part in the tanker tender or set up a joint venture.” Both media reports cited John Kirkland , an attorney at Luce Forward in Los Angeles who said a venture would be announced between United Aircraft and a small, unidentified U.S. defense contractor on March 22 and that he represented the group. CEO Fyodorov, in the Bloomberg interview, said he wasn’t familiar with Kirkland. United Aircraft is Russia’s state- controlled holding company for airplane production. “Either it’s all a huge misunderstanding” or a matter of the Russians not wanting to confirm the plan “until something is officially announced,” Kirkland said in a March 21 interview with Bloomberg. “If I’ve been duped, it’s a massive conspiracy, but anything is possible.” “I’ve spoken with lots of people on the Russian side” including from United Aircraft, Kirkland said, adding that he was told Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin had approved the plan to bid. “That’s consistent with what I’ve been told for the last six months,” he said. Clinton Visit Putin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said by telephone that he was unaware of any plans by United Aircraft to bid. The same was true of a U.S. State Department spokesman. “To my knowledge there was no discussion of a Russian company bidding for the Pentagon tanker contract” during U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton ’s visit to Moscow last week, department spokesman Philip Crowley said on March 21. Crowley said he was present in Clinton’s meetings. During the talks, “Russian leaders expressed an interest in a joint cargo aircraft project, but it was not specific,” he said. The U.S. Department of Defense is seeking bidders to build a fleet of aerial refueling tankers, replacing aircraft that have been in service since the mid-1950s. Boeing Co. this month was left as the only bidder after Northrop Grumman Corp. pulled out of a team that included European Aeronautic, Defence & Space Co., which currently is mulling whether to bid on its own. Pentagon spokesman Geoff Morrell said in a March 19 e-mail that the Department of Defense welcomed all “qualified bidders” to compete for the contract. To contact the reporters on this story: Gopal Ratnam in Washington at gratnam1@bloomberg.net ; Lyubov Pronina in Moscow at lpronina@bloomberg.net ;

Read the full article →

Citigroup Bolsters Proprietary Trading Arm as Volcker Rule Spurs Defectors

March 15, 2010

By Bradley Keoun March 16 (Bloomberg) — Citigroup Inc. , the bank 27 percent owned by the U.S., is bolstering a unit that trades stocks with the bank’s own money after a proposed government ban of so- called proprietary trading helped spur eight of its 22 employees to defect, people with direct knowledge of the matter said. Kevin Russell , head of Americas stock trading, told employees and securities firms supporting the unit last week that Citigroup may increase the group’s trading limits and capital, according to the people. The New York-based bank will replace some or all of the six portfolio managers and analysts who left since their leader, Matt Carpenter , quit in February, according to two of the people, who declined to be identified because the unit’s operations are confidential. Citigroup is trying to preserve the unit, which produces about $100 million of annual revenue , as banks face a proposed ban on proprietary trading dubbed by President Barack Obama as the Volcker rule. Chief Executive Officer Vikram Pandit fed concern among the unit’s remaining employees that Citigroup’s commitment might wither under U.S. pressure when he told a bailout oversight panel this month that banks shouldn’t use their own money to speculate, the people said. “Vikram the academic can put on his academic hat and conclude that the Volcker rule makes sense,” said Brad Hintz , an analyst for Sanford C. Bernstein & Co. who follows the securities industry. “On the other hand, the Volcker rule hasn’t been passed, nobody knows what the capital rules are going to be, so why on earth not take advantage of it?” Moore Capital Carpenter departed as head of the so-called long-short equity unit along with deputy Matt Newton for hedge fund Moore Capital Management LP, according to the people. The long-short unit oversees more than $1 billion of assets, and tries to hedge against economic and market risks by matching bullish stock bets with bearish holdings in the same or related industries, said a person familiar with its operations. Although Carpenter had begun interviewing with several hedge funds last year, he told Citigroup executives his decision to leave was partly influenced by Obama’s announcement of the Volcker rule, people briefed on the discussions said. The rule is named after former Federal Reserve Chairman Paul Volcker , now an Obama adviser who has said banks supported by federal deposit insurance shouldn’t be allowed to engage in proprietary trading or own hedge funds or private-equity firms. Russell called the other securities firms to make sure they didn’t scale back the amount of stock analysis or other attention they give the long-short group, or take advantage of the knowledge of its trading positions, the people said. He indicated that the bank was in the business to stay , they said. Pandit Speaks “Proprietary trading represents an extremely small fraction of our revenue and an even smaller commitment of capital,” spokesman Stephen Cohen said. Any increase in the unit’s capital will be matched by reductions in other areas, so the overall allocation to proprietary trading in Citigroup’s stock-trading division will remain flat or down slightly, a person familiar with the bank’s operations said. At the Congressional Oversight Panel hearing in Washington on March 4, Pandit, 53, defined a proprietary trading unit as one that doesn’t interact with clients and gets stock analysis and other research from outside securities firms. That’s the model of the long-short equity group, which is isolated from the rest of Citigroup’s operations on its trading floor in downtown Manhattan. “Proprietary trading is not a big part of our business at all,” Pandit said. “You’re using the company’s capital, and I don’t believe you should use, banks should use capital to speculate that way.” Trading Units Senator Christopher Dodd , the Connecticut Democrat who runs the Senate Banking Committee, unveiled legislation yesterday to overhaul the financial industry that potentially empowers regulators to break up large financial firms, supervise hedge funds and ban proprietary trading at banks. The long-short unit is one of at least five proprietary trading teams in the bank’s stock-trading division, the person said. Other methods include using computers and formulas to analyze trading data, betting on the probability of corporate events and trying to exploit irregular gaps between a company’s security classes, the person said. Across the company, proprietary trading units produced about 2 percent of Citigroup’s 2009 revenue, or about $1.6 billion, a person close to the bank said. They accounted for about $10 billion of the bank’s total assets, or 0.5 percent of the $1.86 trillion balance sheet , said the person. Citi Holdings The data don’t include Phibro LLC, a proprietary energy- trading business that the bank sold last year rather than face government scrutiny of head trader Andrew Hall’s $100 million pay package. “We have exited or moved to Citi Holdings the vast majority of proprietary trading businesses, reduced the capital committed to these activities and have no plans to increase the total capital committed to them,” Cohen said. Citi Holdings is a $547 billion group of “non-core” businesses that Pandit has tagged for eventual disposal. “In many cases, we use learning from our proprietary trading activity to create and test new strategies for clients,” Cohen said. Three of the long-short group’s 10 portfolio managers have left since Carpenter departed, the people said: J.P. Gravitt, who specializes in technology companies; Hunter Horgan , who focuses on energy; and Jay Kim , a health-care specialist. Gravitt and Horgan are going to Moore, the people said. Energy analyst Sam White quit yesterday to join Moore, the people said. Staff Status Kim, who left last week, hasn’t disclosed his new job, the people said. Kim’s analyst, Susan Lee , left with him, and Gordon Malin , a financial-company analyst, left to join another hedge fund, SAC Capital Advisors LP, the people said. Horgan and White said they couldn’t comment. Gravitt, Kim, Malin and Lee couldn’t be reached. A spokesman for Moore, Shawn Pattison , declined to comment. Jonathan Gasthalter , a spokesman for SAC Capital, declined to comment. Carpenter isn’t being replaced, and the proprietary trading unit now is overseen jointly by Russell and Sutesh Sharma , who oversees Citigroup’s proprietary stock trading businesses from London, people close to the company said. The employees who quit were offered the potential for higher compensation and written contracts from hedge funds instead of Citigroup’s oral assurances, according to the people. Citigroup, which got a $45 billion bailout in 2008 and repaid $20 billion last year, remains subject to government pay curbs because the Treasury Department owns 7.7 billion of its shares . Permanent Capital The bank also won’t provide permanent capital commitments to individual traders because of the potential for changing market conditions, the person familiar with the bank’s operations said. The long-short group’s remaining portfolio managers already have seen their individual trading limits climb, in some cases by more than 50 percent, people briefed on the matter said. Since the bank is hiring to replace the portfolio managers who left, total capital allocated to the unit would ultimately be higher than before Carpenter left, people close to the bank said. To contact the reporter on this story: Bradley Keoun in New York at bkeoun@bloomberg.net .

Read the full article →

Aaron Harber: Set America’s CEOs Free: Why Corporate Chieftains Should Talk More

March 15, 2010

At the recent IHS CERA Week — considered the world’s premiere international energy conference — a phalanx of chief executive officers made their cases to a generally friendly audience filled with energy industry leaders. The audience — whose members paid $7,500 to attend the elite event — was surprised at times by the differences in viewpoints and opinions each executive expressed — with many disagreeing with the others in what proved to be a thought-provoking, almost existential “debate” on issues ranging from future energy prices to the roles to be played by competing energy resources to corporate responsibility to Climate Change. The common element throughout the event, however, was how impressive the executives were in their knowledge, articulateness, and ability to make the case for their perspectives. Most even exhibited a keen sense of humor — a necessity when speaking any time after lunch. Conference keynote speakers such as Energy Secretary Steven Chu, Presidential Economic Adviser and former Treasury Secretary Larry Summers, CNN Senior Analyst and Harvard Professor David Gergen, and Washington Post columnist David Ignatius were expected to be smart, articulate, entertaining, and humorous — and were. But the private sector professionals were their equals in every respect — demonstrating superb speaking abilities. Andrew Liveris, CEO of DOW Chemical, brought down the house when he mentioned his company’s annual utility bill was $30 billion and then, after pausing before the 2,000 energy industry attendees, said “You’re welcome.” It was obvious when top industry leaders such as Saudi ARAMCO President Khalid Al-Falih, ConocoPhillips CEO James Mulva, Edison International CEO Ted Craver, GDF SUEZ President Jean-Francois Cirelli, Apache CEO Steve Farris, Baker Hughes CEO Chad Deaton, TOTAL Gas & Power President Phillippe Boisseau, PG&E CEO Peter Darbee, Spectra Energy CEO Greg Ebel, American Electric Power CEO Michael Morris, RasGas CEO Hamad Rashid Al Mohannadi or Southern Company CEO David Ratliffe spoke, they knew the issues and had the answers — and could deliver information in a compelling and engaging manner. Today many CEO’s hide behind communications and public relations staffs. This is a mistake and represents a loss for companies who waste such a valuable resource. While their time is limited due to their responsibilities, CEO’s often are the best spokespersons for their organizations. And when it comes to public policy related to energy issues, they need to become far more engaged — making the case for their perspectives and being willing to debate the issues with those who have different views. The conference demonstrated there are no better people to do this than CEO’s — the people who know better than anyone else the issues, their industries, their companies, their business partners, their customers, and the public policies under which they function. These men and women should not shy away from those who disagree with them. If CEOs more actively engaged in public debate, it would give everyone the chance to hear what the needs and concerns of all stakeholders are. And that would be good for CEO’s to hear other opinions as well. In addition, such an initiative creates the opportunity to create relationships which can serve the interests of companies, their customers, other stakeholders, and members of the public. Furthermore, this has the potential to positively impact regulatory requirements under which different industries labor. Although not every CEO is a great public speaker and or a great debater, most are. They rarely obtained their positions by being wallflowers. It’s time to let them bloom and get out in the public arena more than ever before. If they do, everyone will benefit from the information they have, the knowledge they can share, the caring and commitment they can convey, and the sense of humor they have. It also is an opportunity for the CEOs to get new information and better understand the concerns of others. Let a thousand CEOs bloom! ========================================================================= Aaron Harber hosts ” Colorado Election 2010 TM” seen Mondays at 8:00 pm on COMCAST Entertainment Television and viewable 24/7 at www.Colorado2010.com. He also hosts ” The Aaron Harber Show ” seen on CET and at www.HarberTV.com. Send e-mail to Aaron@HarberTV.com. (C) Copyright 2010 by Aaron Harber and USA Talk Network, Inc. All rights reserved. =========================================================================

Read the full article →

Petters Should Get 335 Years for $3.5 Billion Fraud, Prosecutors Recommend

March 9, 2010

By Bob Van Voris March 8 (Bloomberg) — Petters Group Worldwide LLC founder Thomas Petters , convicted of running a $3.5 billion fraud, should be sentenced to 335 years in prison, U.S. prosecutors recommended. Petters, 52, was convicted in December of 20 criminal counts in what prosecutors said is the biggest fraud in Minnesota history. In a sentencing memorandum filed today, they asked U.S. District Judge Richard Kyle in St. Paul to give Petters the maximum sentence, more than twice the 150-year prison term given to Bernard Madoff . “The defendant’s fraud is staggering and unprecedented in size and impact on victims and the community,” prosecutors argued in the court filing. Petters ran a Minnetonka, Minnesota-based business empire that bought companies including Sun Country Airlines Inc. and Polaroid Corp. until federal agents raided his home and offices on Sept. 24, 2008. Petters used one of his companies, Petters Co. Inc., or PCI, in an illegal scheme that raised cash to support his money-losing businesses and lavish personal lifestyle, prosecutors said at his trial last year. Petters was convicted of all of the counts against him, including fraud, conspiracy and money laundering, by a federal jury in St. Paul. ‘Not Evil’ “Petters is imperfect, yes, but not evil,” said Paul Engh, one of Petters’s lawyers, in court papers also filed today, urging Kyle to sentence his client to less than 13 years. Prosecutors claim Petters used PCI to lure hedge funds and other investors into giving him money to finance non-existent deals to buy shipments of consumer goods. Government lawyers argued in their papers today that Petters defrauded his best friend, his father-in-law and a long- time business partner to keep his illegal scheme afloat. Other victims included “at least 10 pastors, three missionaries and dozens of retired, elderly individuals,” they said. Petters, who testified in his own defense, claimed he was innocent and that the fraud was committed without his knowledge by former company Vice President Deanna Coleman and Robert White , the company’s former chief financial officer. Petters also told jurors that the 2004 murder of his son forced him to rely on Coleman instead of paying attention to the affairs of his company. Secret Tapes During the trial, prosecutors played tape-recorded conversations secretly made by Coleman, who turned in Petters to the authorities and testified against him. “That Mr. Petters sprinted out from St. Cloud and a small stereo store, that his reach would exceed his grasp, that he over-promised and underperformed, that he loved his life and his family and his employees and the memory of his murdered son, that he gave millions away, that he acted as a mentor, bought businesses and was visible in the community are all true,” Engh said, in papers quoting Albert Camus , F. Scott Fitzgerald , Walt Whitman and Joan Didion . Engh said Petters has a tumor on his pituitary gland and described him as a “marked man in prison” based on the notoriety of his case. Engh also cited the non-violent nature of the crimes, Petters’s philanthropy and the demands by his hedge- fund victims for unreasonable rates of return. “The victims’ conduct contributed to the loss,” Engh said. “By requiring inordinate returns, the hedge funds and their investors assured themselves a failed business model.” Petters is scheduled to be sentenced April 8. Madoff, 71, pleaded guilty last year to running the biggest Ponzi scheme in history. He is serving his 150-year sentence in a federal prison in North Carolina. The case is U.S. v. Thomas Joseph Petters, 08-00364, U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota (St. Paul). To contact the reporters on this story: Bob Van Voris in St. Paul, Minnesota, at rvanvoris@bloomberg.net .

Read the full article →

David Harris: America Over a Barrel

February 28, 2010

There are some things I just don’t get. One of them is America’s chronic inability to address our energy dependence on countries hostile to our core values. Though grave damage is being done to our national security and economy, as a nation, we just can’t summon the will to solve a problem which does have a solution. Thirty-seven years ago, a shot was fired across our bow. OPEC, the oil cartel, decided to mix politics and economics by declaring a boycott of the U.S. Then came the quadrupling of oil prices, sending our economy into a tailspin. Our political leaders all promised dramatic action to wean us from our addiction. Initially, some progress was made in raising fuel economy standards and improving overall energy efficiency. But, in the end, their promises fell short. The price of oil stabilized as output kept pace with demand, and we were quickly lulled right back into collective national complacency. We felt that it was no one’s business to tell us what to drive, how to drive, or what to do in our oil-heated homes. This was America, after all, not some nanny state. So when President Jimmy Carter turned down the thermostat in the White House one winter, donned a sweater, and asked us to do the same, we scoffed at our leader. Didn’t he know that, as Americans, we were entitled to be the world’s biggest energy consumers? How dare he ask us to sacrifice? Then Congress made matters worse. Even as fuel economy standards were being raised for cars, Capitol Hill exempted light trucks and vans from the rules. Lo and behold, as Americans bought more and more of these gas-guzzlers — eventually more than half of all vehicles sold in any given year — our oil needs only grew. In more recent years, we again became aware of the danger of our oil dependence. The 9/11 attacks were a sobering reminder. We learned that Saudi Arabia, with the world’s largest oil reserves, was spending tens of billions of dollars in oil revenue to support the extremist Wahhabi version of Islam around the world. Mosques and madrassas were purveying a message of intolerance and conflict, even as Saudi Arabia was taking out slick ads in the American media promoting our two countries’ “shared values.” We watched as Venezuela, the fifth largest exporter of oil to the U.S. and owner of CITGO, used its petrodollars to undermine American interests in Latin America and to forge ties with Iran. And more broadly, we witnessed energy security issues penetrate just about every nook and cranny in international relations. America tried to bring the horrors of Darfur to an end, but China’s interest in Sudan’s oil made it difficult to get concerted international action — and China isn’t alone. We’ve tried to forge consensus against Iran’s nuclear program, but China’s interest in Iran’s oil complicates that, too — and, again, China isn’t alone. Meanwhile, European countries, most of which are heavily dependent on imported oil, are forced to tiptoe politically around the likes of Libya, a nation with the eighth largest proven reserves in the world. And do we Americans need reminders about the costly consequences for our own foreign policy of our reliance on Middle Eastern oil? What can be done about this? For starters: First, focus on the prize — a world where the value of oil has dropped dramatically. Imagine what that could mean for the distribution of global power. And think about the impact on our economy if we could keep hundreds of billions of dollars per year right here rather than sending them overseas to Venezuela to buy weapons from Moscow or to Saudi Arabia to fund madrassas in Pakistan. Second, it’s time we demand — yes, demand — concerted action by all our elected officials. Words won’t suffice. We’ve had too many of them. Excuses for inaction won’t wash. The very future of our nation is at stake, and it’s high time to put this issue at the top of our agenda and keep it there. Third, let’s drop the partisanship. This is about America, not about political parties. Both parties should have an identical interest in moving the country toward real energy security. However naive it may sound, what a sight it would be to see Democrats and Republicans standing shoulder-to-shoulder and pledging united action to deal with our energy dependence head-on until we reach the goal. Fourth, think bold. Brazil did in the 1970s. It was even more dependent than we on imported oil. No longer. The country today is energy independent, through a combination of national planning, technological innovation, and exploration. And now China is on the way. Beijing has already announced that it seeks to be the global leader in post-oil technologies. Are we going to be content one day to replace our dependence on Middle Eastern oil with dependence on Chinese alternative energy technologies? Fifth, look in the mirror. How many of us have been part of the problem — by our buying and driving patterns, by our lifestyles, by a sense of entitlement, and by a belief that some are exempted from the rules that should govern others? With modest changes in our own behavior, we can have a dramatic impact. And sixth, look to Europe. Not a single one of the most fuel-efficient cars in the U.S. would make the comparable list in Europe, where the base line for the top ten models is 64 miles per gallon. Are Europeans any less interested in safety, emissions controls, or comfort than we are? Europe has also gone much further than the U.S. in developing public transportation. So, too, has Japan. Now China is leaping ahead. This is especially striking in the realm of high-speed trains. We waited decades for the Acela, but compared to what’s available elsewhere, including the Maglev in Shanghai and the TGV in France, forgive me, it’s practically ancient. This is true in metropolitan areas as well. Outside a handful of American cities, public transportation options are few and far between, compelling residents to rely on private vehicles for everything from work to shopping. And even in New York, with its extensive network, a project like the Second Avenue Subway has been in the works, according to author Robert Caro, since “shortly after World War I,” yet we’re still not there. Saddest of all is the knowledge that it’s well within our grasp to break the stranglehold. We can dramatically reduce our dependence on imported oil from hostile countries, while boosting our national security and enhancing our domestic economy — not to mention the benefits that measures reducing greenhouse-gas emissions will provide in terms of climate change and the environment. We have the scientific and entrepreneurial know-how to develop new technologies, and, save oil, abundant natural resources. There’s no one silver bullet for our problem, but there are several promising possibilities. All should be pursued, consistent, of course, with strict environmental safeguards. President Obama, speaking last year of “our journey toward energy independence,” said that “America’s dependence on oil is one of the most serious threats that our nation faces. It bankrolls dictators, pays for nuclear proliferation, and funds both sides of our struggle against terrorism.” By contrast, the former director of Saudi intelligence, Prince Turki al-Faisal, replied that “Like it or not, the fates of the United States and Saudi Arabia are connected and will remain so for decades to come” because of the oil link. Which will it be? President Obama’s vision or Prince Turki al-Faisal’s? The answer should be obvious. The ways to reach it are clear. The bottom-line question is whether there’s the national will.

Read the full article →

Janet Tavakoli: Washington Abandons Greece: Beware of Geeks Bearing Grifts

February 28, 2010

The European Union (EU) is shocked–shocked I tell you!–that Greece used financial engineering to qualify for admission. Exactly how did they think that weaker countries managed to meet the requirements? Now the EU is concerned that geeks used their knowledge of Greece’s hidden debt (and bailout negotiations) to manipulate financial markets for their own profit. A few years ago, Greece engaged in derivatives transactions which essentially gave it a disguised loan, a gift from geeks. Greece may or may not have had plans to invest the money to create national wealth instead of say, blowing it all on national bling. Either way, Greece used its national credit card in a futile attempt to keep up with the EU Joneses. The National Bank of Greece seems embarrassed. Last week, it removed the prospectus for Titlos PLC , the financial engineering vehicle arranged for it by Goldman Sachs International, from its web site. Now Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke is concerned with the way credit derivatives and other financial instruments are being used during Greece’s current debt crisis. In his semi-annual economic report to Congress, Benanke said the Fed and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) would look into the involvement of the banks they oversee: “Obviously, using these instruments in a way that intentionally destabilizes a company or a country is–is counterproductive.” He should question all related Greek and Euro transactions (not just derivatives). Banks claim their trades aren’t risky because they are doing customer business. One should remember that Goldman Sachs claimed its destabilizing transactions with AIG were “customer business.” How did that work out? EU Needs its Own Investigation To paraphrase Winston Churchill, U.S. financial regulators occasionally stumble over the truth, but they pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing ever happened. In February 2007, I wrote the SEC about U.S. corporate credit derivatives indexes–similar to the sovereign indexes that reference Greece’s debt. Banks persuaded U.S. state pension funds to use them as “hedges” to protect their large fixed income portfolios.* Next banks served other customers by creating phoney “AAA” rated products. These fake investments used lots of leverage (borrowing), and they pushed hard in the opposite direction of the pension funds’ trades. As a result, the pension funds’ “hedges” collapsed, and they lost money. The customers that bought the new “investments” lost money, too. Within a year, the phoney AAA investments were downgraded to junk, and customers lost around 90% of their money. (These financial instruments were unrelated to phoney mortgage securitizations.) Banks made hefty fees, but the pension funds and customers they suckered into taking these “gifts” were harmed. I gave the SEC a map and a flashlight, yet it went nowhere. ( My letter still sits on the SEC’s web site.) I’m called the ” Cassandra of credit derivatives ,” but it’s a misnomer. I’m not prescient, I have no psychic ability, and the geeks at U.S. banks–that claim they are great risk managers–are capable of the same analysis. Moreover, only pension funds and banks’ customers were the victims of an unholy rape. Today, rumors are that crony capitalists are using derivatives to profit from Greece’s misery. There are allegations that investment banks and hedge funds used their knowledge of Greece’s hidden debt to drive up its borrowing cost and drive down the Euro. Then these speculators reversed their positions, when they had advance information of a potential bailout for Greece. Other rumors suggest customized trades on the sovereign credit derivatives index also exploited Greece’s problems. Still other rumors point to a campaign to manipulate Greek debt prices and knock down the Euro. The European Union and Greece should launch their own investigations. When U.S. regulators say they’ll “investigate,” it seems to mean “get lost.” The U.S. Should Investigate Transactions that Destabilized America If the U.S.’s “photo-op regulators” are investigating transactions that destabilize countries, they should start at home. Is it ” God’s work ” to enrich crony capitalists–Washington and Wall Street’s new chosen people–while siphoning money from hard-working taxpayers? Geeks used financial technology in a way that destabilized the U.S. economy while the U.S. is at war. I believe there is a much stronger word for it than “counterproductive.” *Pension funds shorted corporate credit default swap indexes (bought credit protection) and took a long position in swap spreads to hedge their bond portfolio credit risk.

Read the full article →

RAIT Financial Trust Q4 2009 Earnings Call Transcript

February 19, 2010

results. Towards the end of 2009, we also began two new business initiatives, RAIT Securities LLC, which provides real estate related fixed income trading services to the market, and we launched RAIT Advisory, which offers the knowledge and expertise

Read the full article →

Gundlach’s Grudge Match With TCW Might Cost `The Godfather’ $500 Million

February 17, 2010

By Edward Robinson and Sree Vidya Bhaktavatsalam Feb. 17 (Bloomberg) — Jeffrey Gundlach has a black eye and a cut on the bridge of his nose, and he winces as he rubs his side. “I think I cracked a rib,” Gundlach, 50, says as he gingerly takes a seat in a conference room in a Los Angeles high-rise in January. Gundlach, a money manager who ran the second-largest mortgage bond fund worldwide, got hurt tripping over a computer cable in his office, not in a fist fight. But he is exchanging blows with his former investment firm, TCW Group Inc., in a brawl that has shocked the bond-trading world with allegations of double-dealing, drug use and workplace pornography, Bloomberg Markets magazine reports in its April issue. The feud reaches from TCW’s headquarters in Los Angeles to Paris, where Societe Generale SA, the firm’s corporate parent, has been pummeled in the global credit crisis. France’s No. 2 bank has written down at least 11 billion euros ($15 billion) after losing additional billions in a 2008 trading scandal. A relentless self-promoter who describes himself as a “money machine,” Gundlach outperformed 99 percent of his rival fixed-income money managers from 2005 to 2009, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. His lieutenants call him “the Godfather” for the loyalty he commands and the rich stream of asset management fees he brings in. ‘Amazingly Brilliant’ “I am amazingly brilliant analytically,” says Gundlach, a wiry man whose short brown hair hugs his skull like a helmet. “I’m the guy who makes it rain in the desert.” TCW Chief Executive Officer Marc Stern fired his rainmaker on Dec. 4. Stern, 65, who former colleagues say is as hard- charging a figure as Gundlach, referred to the ousted money manager as a “prima donna” on a conference call with TCW employees on Dec. 7. A month later, TCW accused Gundlach in a lawsuit of stealing trading and contact data for thousands of clients so he could open his own firm, Los Angeles-based DoubleLine Capital LP. Gundlach, who during 24 years rose from a junior analyst to manage about 70 percent of TCW’s $110 billion in assets, denies the allegations in the lawsuit. In a countersuit filed on Feb. 10, Gundlach contends TCW ousted him largely to take control of the 15 funds he ran and keep $600 million to $1.25 billion in fees his team was due to be paid over the next few years. Bitter Divorce The feud has wounded TCW, which in February took the unusual move of slashing its fees in two of Gundlach’s former funds to induce investors to keep their assets at TCW. With years of bad blood between Gundlach and Stern, this battle isn’t just business — it’s personal. “It’s a bitter divorce,” says Neil Rue , a managing director at Pension Consulting Alliance Inc., a Portland, Oregon-based firm that advises institutional investors. This is a story rooted in old grudges over money and the perennial tension between the suits in the executive suite and the investment wizards on the trading floor. It begins in July 2001, when Societe Generale pushed into U.S. asset management by acquiring TCW. Originally known as Trust Company of the West, the firm went on to invest money for institutions such as the California State Teachers’ Retirement System and Cornell University and counted Henry Kissinger and Enron Corp. founder Kenneth Lay as directors in the 1980s and 1990s. The French bank awarded fresh equity in TCW to its senior officers and skipped over the money managers, former TCW executives say. The move diluted Gundlach’s existing stake, and the money manager says he never forgot the snub. Kerviel’s Losses Paris-based SocGen, a 146-year-old retail bank that had long lagged behind rivals in mergers advice and underwriting, became one of the world’s top issuers of equity derivatives after 2000. Then in January 2008, as the credit crisis was picking up momentum, SocGen disclosed that it had lost 4.9 billion euros unwinding unauthorized bets that trader Jerome Kerviel had made on stock index futures. Kerviel, 33, maintains he acted with the knowledge of his supervisors and hasn’t been accused of personally profiting from the trades. Following the scandal, CEO Daniel Bouton resigned and his successor, Frederic Oudea , moved to spin off far-flung asset management units such as TCW. For Gundlach, who ran his investment team as a quasi- autonomous fiefdom and who has personally earned $134 million since 2005, Oudea’s course augured the end of his independence. Last September, the money manager, who specializes in mortgage- backed securities, threatened to lead a mass defection of his 65-member investment team to his own firm, Stern wrote in January in an e-mail to Bloomberg News. Rocked Washington’s Boat “This would have had an adverse and negative reaction on our fixed-income business,” said Stern, who declined to comment further. Gundlach denies the allegation, saying he wanted to protect his TCW business, not quit. On the same day in December that Gundlach was sacked for allegedly stealing client information, TCW announced it was acquiring Metropolitan West Asset Management LLC, a crosstown rival, to take over his funds. On a conference call with TCW’s 700 employees on Dec. 7, Robert Day , the firm’s founder and chairman, said terminating Gundlach was necessary for the good of the company, according to a recording of the meeting. Day, 66, had been a father figure to Gundlach early in the money manager’s career. Now, three days after Gundlach’s termination, Day likened his one-time protege to a soldier who rocked George Washington ’s boat as it crossed the Delaware River in 1776. ‘Shoot The Soldier’ “Your choices are very simple,” Day told his employees. “You shoot the soldier and throw him overboard, otherwise everybody in the boat goes down.” Day declined to comment for this article. Hours after he was fired, Gundlach returned to a private office he used in Santa Monica to find the lock on the front door removed. Inside, he says, about seven private investigators hired by TCW were searching through his desk and had broken open his filing cabinets. Gundlach says he protested the intrusion and one of the investigators told him to leave the office immediately. The TCW men discovered marijuana stored in jars, drug paraphernalia, pornographic DVDs and a dozen “sexual devices,” according to the company’s lawsuit. TCW alleges that Gundlach’s possession of the material at an office it considered part of the firm’s workplace violated its employment rules and showed he wasn’t fit to manage money for clients or supervise employees as the chief investment officer of the company. Drugs, Porn and Sex Toys Gundlach says the drugs, porn and sex toys are relics from a closed chapter in his life and were stored in a crate. He says TCW disclosed their existence to damage his reputation with investors. “It’s ancient stuff, like a box in an attic,” he says. “But they figured, ‘Let’s try and destroy the guy and throw some slander and sleaze on him.’” Gundlach, who favors custom-made Brioni suits, is equally at home opining on the nuances of the yield curve or the geometry of Piet Mondrian ’s gridlike paintings, which he collects. He’s also blunt and prone to pounding the table when making a point. On the trading floor, Gundlach openly chastises co-workers for mistakes or even their choice of necktie, former colleagues say. “He’s a principled and honest guy, but sometimes he gets himself into trouble by speaking his mind without any sugarcoating,” says Frederick Horton , a money manager at TCW from 1993 to 2005 and now a managing director in New York at Strategos Capital Management LLC. “It can come off as arrogance, but I don’t think he means it that way; it’s just part of his makeup.” Tops Bill Gross Investors say Gundlach’s performance backs up his bluster. His former flagship mutual fund, the TCW Total Return Bond Fund, gained 20 percent in 2009, more than double his peers’ average of 8.6 percent, according to Bloomberg data. The portfolio’s 7.8 percent annual return during the decade ended on Dec. 4 beat the 7.6 percent performance of the PIMCO Total Return Fund run by Bill Gross, co-chief investment officer at Pacific Investment Management Co. in Newport Beach, California, according to Morningstar Inc. In July, the U.S. Treasury selected TCW largely on the strength of Gundlach’s record as one of nine managers for its Public-Private Investment Program to buy distressed mortgage assets. Theoretical Mathematics Gundlach got into the investing business by chance. He was born in 1959, in Buffalo, New York, into a German-American family of scientists. His father, Arthur, was a chemist at a paint manufacturer, and his uncle Robert Gundlach, a physicist, was the primary inventor of the modern photocopier at Xerox Corp., according to the National Inventors Hall of Fame. After graduating from Dartmouth College in New Hampshire with a bachelor’s degree in philosophy and mathematics, Gundlach enrolled in Yale University’s Ph.D. program in theoretical mathematics. His thesis, “The Probabilistic Implications of the Non-Existence of Infinity,” went against 20th-century mathematical canon, which is based on the assumption that infinity exists. He left Yale before completing his degree and moved to Los Angeles in 1983. Gundlach led a carefree existence on the West Coast, playing drums for a rock band called Nuisance. One evening in 1985, he watched the TV program Lifestyles of the Rich and Famous and saw that investment bankers were the top-paid professionals in America. Inspired, he flipped through the Yellow Pages, calling investment firms. Gundlach, then 26, landed a 90-day probationary position as a quantitative analyst in the fixed-income unit at Trust Company of the West for $30,000 a year. Inside the Yield Book Day founded TCW in 1971. He’s the grandson of William Keck, the founder of Superior Oil Co. in Coalinga, California, which was sold to Mobil Corp. in 1984 for $5.7 billion. Day structured TCW as a confederation of semiautonomous boutiques rather than a highly centralized firm, says a former TCW executive who knows him. Day played a paternal role at TCW by bestowing autonomy and generous fee-sharing agreements on his favored money managers, with some keeping more than half the revenue their teams generated, the executive says. Every Christmas, he threw a gala at his Beverly Hills home for his top people and their families. A 10-piece band and circus clowns entertained guests. At TCW, Gundlach says he devoured the 1972 classic primer on bonds, Inside the Yield Book, and studied its formulas. He embraced mortgage bonds and set out to solve what he called “the conundrum of pre-payment risk.” ‘Scenario Analysis’ Many investors avoided mortgage bonds in those days because whenever interest rates fell, borrowers refinanced to settle home loans long before their terms expired. That wiped out gains, including those based on higher interest payments. Gundlach says most money managers erred by using past patterns to predict rate moves and prepayment levels. There are too many variables to make accurate forecasts, from Federal Reserve policy to the housing market, he says. So working with fellow money manager Philip Barach , Gundlach developed a system called “scenario analysis.” It mixed bonds of varying credit risk and duration together to accommodate any rate move. Those bonds that underperformed when rates fell were offset by enough winners to produce profits, Gundlach says. In March 1989, Day agreed to let Gundlach lead his own mortgage-backed securities investment team and retain about half of its asset management fees to distribute to his people as compensation, the money manager says. By late 1992, Gundlach had attracted $10 billion in investor assets and the following June unveiled the TCW Total Return Bond Fund. Secretary of State Kissinger Day offered Gundlach the option to buy an equity stake in TCW, which was coveted by money managers and senior executives. And the chairman sat his prized pupil next to former U.S. Secretary of State Kissinger, a TCW director from 1981 to 2003, at luncheons following periodic board meetings, Gundlach says. “I was happy,” he says. “I believed.” Across the Atlantic, Societe Generale CEO Bouton was moving in 2001 to become a global player after losing his bid to acquire rival Paribas SA to Banque Nationale de Paris SA. SocGen, which was privatized in 1987 following 42 years as a state-run institution, bought banks in the Czech Republic and Slovenia. In July 2001, SocGen purchased 51 percent of TCW for $784 million and agreed to pay about $425 million to increase the stake to 70 percent over five years; Day and TCW retained the remaining 30 percent of equity. Gundlach Diluted Stern, a lawyer who joined TCW in 1990 after serving as president of life insurer SunAmerica Inc., played a key role in negotiating the deal, say two former TCW money man­agers. SocGen granted new equity stakes in TCW only to senior operating executives, the money managers say. Gundlach says he was furious because the issuance of new equity diluted his existing stake by a quarter, decreasing its value by $15 million. Stern had violated a pledge to never diminish his holding, Gundlach says. “That’s absurd,” TCW spokeswoman Erin Freeman says. “Societe Generale’s acquisition of TCW did involve some dilution, and it was the same for each shareholder commensurate with the shares owned.” In September 2005, the TCW board elevated Gundlach to chief investment officer as part of a move to bring the next generation to power at the firm. Day relinquished his CEO title to Robert Beyer, then 45, a former fixed-income money manager, and Stern stepped aside as president to become vice chairman. SocGen’s AIG Exposure When the Kerviel scandal hit SocGen in January 2008, TCW was immediately affected. French regulators opened an insider- trading probe of Day, then a SocGen director, after he and his foundation sold 148 million euros worth of the bank’s stock before SocGen publicly disclosed the trading losses on Jan. 24, according to regulatory records. Josh Pekarsky, a spokesman for Day, says Day used no inside information with respect to the stock sales and is cooperating with the investigation. Day resigned from SocGen’s board on Dec. 31. Oudea, 46, SocGen’s former chief financial officer, took the helm in May 2008 with a mandate to staunch the bank’s losses. The carnage would have been far worse for SocGen had Washington failed to execute a $182 billion bailout of American International Group Inc. in 2008. SocGen held held $16.5 billion in credit-default swaps issued by AIG, the largest such exposure, according to filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Backdoor Bailout Under a deal arranged by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, then led by Timothy F. Geithner , the insurer settled the swaps with SocGen and other AIG trading partners at 100 cents on the dollar. The decision spurred accusations from U.S. Congress members that Geithner, who is now the U.S. Treasury secretary, gave the banks a “backdoor bailout” at the expense of taxpayers. Gundlach, too, was investing in the exotic instruments that helped fuel the crash. Under his direction, TCW became the No. 1 manager in collateralized debt obligations, with $41.3 billion under management as of Sept. 30, 2007, according to data from Standard & Poor’s. That included $35.1 billion of CDOs composed of asset-backed securities, including mortgages. Gundlach says his CDOs rotated out of high-risk home loans early in the credit crisis and escaped the worst of it. In January 2009, Societe Generale said TCW would be spun off in a stock offering sometime in the next five years as part of a reorganization of its asset management division. Gundlach says he assumed the French would sell TCW if the right offer was made. Gundlach Blows Up At the end of May, Day summoned Gundlach to his home to meet with him and Stern. The two men told Gundlach that Beyer, TCW’s CEO, was about to announce his retirement at the age of 49 and Stern was to be named CEO. Gundlach blew up. “I was like, ‘No! No! What do you mean you’re coming back? You turned this over to the next generation. This is all completely the opposite of what I was led to expect,’” Gundlach says. Beyer declined to comment. The two men offered to make Gundlach president, which he says he rejected. Gundlach had never forgotten the dilution of his equity stake in 2001, and he says he accused Stern of stealing $15 million from him. The meeting ended badly. “Gundlach’s claims are without merit,” TCW spokeswoman Freeman says. In late August, Gundlach says, he heard rumors that Stern had convened a team of lawyers to fire him. On Sept. 3, the money manager asked Stern to join him and members of his team in a conference room off the trading floor to clear the air. The mood was tense as the money manager and the CEO faced one another, according to an account by Gundlach and Barach. Threat to TCW Gundlach asked Stern whether he was planning to fire him. Stern replied no. Gundlach asked whether SocGen was going to sell the firm. Stern again answered no. Gundlach then made an oral offer to buy 51 percent of TCW for $350 million. And several of his top lieutenants, including Barach and money manager Louis Lucido , voiced support for their boss. “Just so you know, if anything happens to Jeffrey, we’re going with him,” Lucido, now executive vice president at DoubleLine, says he told Stern. Stern considered Gundlach’s behavior confrontational and insubordinate and came away convinced the money manager now posed a threat to the welfare of the firm, says a TCW executive familiar with Stern’s views. Gundlach’s informal buyout bid was rejected, Jacques Ripoll , head of SocGen’s global investment group , wrote in a January e-mail to Bloomberg News. TCW lawyers started reading Gundlach’s e-mails and allegedly found some in which he declared war on TCW and solicited his subordinates’ allegiance to him, according to the company’s lawsuit. TCW investigators monitored and recorded his team’s computer activity. Firing Gundlach Beginning in early September, members of Gundlach’s team allegedly started downloading data on every holding of every client in the mortgage-backed-securities group and contact information for more than 24,000 TCW clients firm-wide, according to the suit. Gundlach’s deputies also engaged a commercial real estate agent to find an office that could accommodate a 50-desk trading floor and registered the name DoubleLine on Nov. 22 in Delaware, the complaint says. At the end of the month, Stern briefed Ripoll and received his blessing to take the next step, the TCW executive says. After lunch on Friday, Dec. 4, Gundlach was at his desk on the 16th floor when he got a call from Michael Cahill , TCW’s general counsel, asking him to come up one flight to the executive suite. Stern wasn’t there. Cahill told Gundlach his TCW career was over, the money manager says. Stairwell Chase The attorney tried to give Gundlach a legal document describing how he and his team took confidential information. Gundlach says he refused to take it and turned to go, saying he had trades to complete. Cahill told him he couldn’t return to his desk. Gundlach says he ducked into a stairwell and Cahill and another lawyer followed him down 17 flights to the street, demanding he take the papers. They gave up as Gundlach took off along Figueroa Street in downtown Los Angeles. Cahill declined to comment. Gundlach says he did ask deputies to find office space and register DoubleLine in case TCW fired him. He denies directing employees to steal client data or any other trade secrets. In the two weeks after Gundlach was ousted, more than 40 members of his TCW team quit to join DoubleLine. Barach is now DoubleLine’s president. Oaktree Capital Management LP, a Los Angeles firm with $67 billion in assets, invested an undisclosed sum in DoubleLine for a 22 percent stake. $500 Million in Fees In his Feb. 10 answer to TCW’s lawsuit, Gundlach says DoubleLine has hired a firm to search computers belonging to former TCW employees and return any data that might be in their possession. “DoubleLine’s establishment has not involved the use of any TCW information whatsoever,” Gundlach says. Gundlach contends that TCW canned him largely to capture all of the fees from funds that he and Barach set up in 2007 to invest in distressed mortgage-backed securities, including two with $3 billion in assets. Gundlach says the strategy returned 60 percent in 2009. Along with revenue from his other funds, Gundlach says he was personally eyeing a payday of about $500 million over the next few years. “They just wanted to broom-sweep me out and shanghai my business,” he says. Freeman disputes that allegation. “He was let go because he stole from the company,” she says. Investors Flee TCW said it planned to start an equity-based compensation plan in the first quarter to retain employees. “The priority now is to concentrate on moving the business forward,” Ripoll wrote in an email on Feb. 11. TCW’s standing with clients has been shaken by its firing of Gundlach: In December, TCW said it would liquidate its $1 billion PPIP fund for distressed assets after Gundlach’s dismissal triggered a so-called key-man clause and prompted the Treasury to freeze the firm’s participation in the program. Investors pulled more than $6 billion in assets from the Total Return fund between Dec. 4 and Feb. 8, according to Morningstar. In January, pension funds in Colorado, Kansas and Texas withdrew a total of $1.2 billion from TCW. “We decided to terminate because we’re no longer getting the team we signed up for,” says Robert Smith, chief investment officer at the Kansas Public Employees Retirement System. Investors in TCW’s distressed funds are livid that their holdings have become pawns in the dispute, says Tania Modic , CEO of Western Investments Capital LLC in Incline Village, Nevada, which put $10 million in the funds. Clients asked TCW to permit them to make so-called in-kind transfers of assets to another firm so they don’t have to liquidate the securities into cash. TCW Slashes Fees TCW says it declined, offering an option to slash fees to 1 percent on assets and 5 percent on profits from 2 percent and 20 percent. Modic says it appears TCW would rather alienate its clients than see them transfer their assets to DoubleLine, which is what she wants to do. “Something happened to get their panties in a twist because their behavior is bizarre,” Modic says. “This shows gross disrespect for investors.” Freeman says TCW is treating its investors fairly. Gundlach is also feeling the fallout. TCW is seeking at least $200 million in damages from DoubleLine and wants it to relinquish its revenue. The lawsuit has hindered DoubleLine’s ability to raise assets beyond the $3 billion it has brought in so far, Gundlach says. Pension consultant Rue says he’s advised institutional investors not to commit capital to DoubleLine until the litigation plays out. Starting Over At DoubleLine’s offices, located a few blocks from TCW, Gundlach strides past electricians working on his half-completed trading floor and points to a spot where he plans to blow a hole in the ceiling and install a minimalist sculpture by the late artist Donald Judd . Gundlach, after more than two decades managing money, is now starting over. This time around, with a lawsuit threatening his new firm, he may find that repairing a career can be harder than building one. To contact the reporters on this story: Edward Robinson in San Francisco at edrobinson@bloomberg.net Sree Vidya Bhaktavatsalam in Boston at sbhaktavatsa@bloomberg.net

Read the full article →

Simon Sinek: Meet The New Chairman of the FED: Charles Darwin

February 15, 2010

As if Charles Darwin himself were personally involved, the significant economic dips and downturns we face seem designed to weed out the weak. It’s a good thing. By doing so, the economy, as a whole, can enter the next decade stronger, free of dead weight and old thinking so our society can more easily progress forwards. But recessions and other major dips only happen about every decade. So what about the other nine years? How can organizations ensure that their foundations are strong enough to adapt to any economic climate, weather any change and adapt to seize the opportunities brought with the introduction of new technologies? How can organizations make sure that they are the fittest who survive? There are two types of weak companies – the ones who will suffer the most in a downturn. 1. The structurally weak. 2. The culturally weak. The structurally weak are those with poor systems and processes. They survived in the good times not because they were good, but because it was hard to fail…think dot com. There were a LOT of bad companies run by 21 year olds with big ideas and barely a whiff of a sound business model who were securing millions of dollars of funding. The culture at many was strong; the whole sector was intoxicated by the possibilities…and most failed. But they didn’t all fail, there were a few who not only survived, but continue to thrive to this day. They had structure where the others didn’t. But it is the culturally weak that I find more fascinating. The structurally weak can hire a consultant or read a book to gain the knowledge they need to implement good systems (and they have to follow through, of course). But the culturally weak can’t outsource a solution. Having a strong culture inside an organization takes clarity, discipline and consistency from those who lead. Take Lehman-Brothers , for example. A very successful company that collapsed not in months or weeks…but in days. At the slightest shudder, the house of cards came tumbling down. They were good at what they did and they knew how to do it. Their systems and processes were sound (they were the same as all the other banks). But because their leadership was weak their culture suffered. There was no sense of shared a purpose or cause beyond the accumulation of personal wealth, there was no glue to hold the company together. If you look at companies with strong cultures – Patagonia , Container Store , Google , to name a few – the people who work there come to work with a feeling that they are a part of something bigger than themselves. Their jobs are more than making a living. It’s more than a need to pay the bills. The company they work for is a part of their personal identity. To those who work in companies with a strong culture, the accumulation of personal wealth is the byproduct of being a part of something that inspires them and not, as was the case at Lehman the primary driver. It is this culture – shared values and beliefs – that bonds the employees together and inspires them to batten down the hatches when the going gets tough. Not for themselves, but for the good of the company and their colleagues. In this recent economic downturn, many companies learned the lesson to improve the quality of their systems and processes, but not enough realize the need to strengthen their cultures also. No matter where you work, try to take a job in which you like the culture as much as you like the benefits package and the odds are much higher you’ll survive the next dip because they will too. To learn more about how to build a strong corporate culture, read Simon Sinek ‘s new book Start With Why: How great leaders inspire everyone to take action .

Read the full article →

House Democrat John Murtha Dies at Age 77 After Complications From Surgery

February 8, 2010

By Laurence Arnold Feb. 8 (Bloomberg) — John Murtha , a former Marine drill instructor turned congressman who unapologetically wielded his power to benefit his Pennsylvania district, died today. He was 77. Murtha, a Democrat, died of complications after undergoing gallbladder surgery in late January in a hospital in Arlington, Virginia. During 36 years in the House, the Vietnam veteran from Johnstown, Pennsylvania, rose to chairman of the subcommittee that approves defense spending. That perch gave him a platform to exert his knowledge and strong beliefs about the proper use of the U.S. military. In November 2005, citing increasing attacks on Americans, he called for an immediate withdrawal of U.S. troops from Iraq, a military engagement he had voted for in 2002. He was an ally of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi of California. “It’s the passing of a major political figure who was close to the speaker and always involved in Democratic legislation,” said Stuart Rothenberg , an independent political analyst based in Washington. Rothenberg called Murtha a major force in “forming American politics in jobs and spending.” Representative Norm Dicks , Democrat from Washington state, the senior most member of the Defense Appropriations subcommittee after Murtha, would be the “one most likely to succeed,” George Behan, a spokesman for Dicks, said in an interview. The House Appropriations committee headed by Representative Dave Obey , Democrat of Wisconsin, would make the final decision, Behan said. User of Earmarks Murtha’s seat on the Appropriations Committee enabled him to become one of Congress’s most adept users of the earmark process to send money to specific projects back home. The John Murtha Johnston-Cambria County Airport was among the more visible results of his taxpayer-funded largess. Murtha steered an estimated $150 million in federal funds to the airport, the Washington Post reported in 2009. Murtha’s town also became a popular place for defense contractors, which received millions in earmarks through the congressman. Some of those firms donated to Murtha’s campaign and gave jobs to his allies, the Post reported, creating a web of connections that drew the attention of federal prosecutors. Searches were carried out in January and February of 2009 at the offices of a Virginia lobbying firm and a Pennsylvania- based defense contractor that had benefited from Murtha’s earmarks. Abscam Investigation Earlier in his career, he was investigated — though not prosecuted — in the Abscam bribery scandal that led to the convictions of seven other lawmakers in the 1980s. Murtha’s use of earmarks and ties to lobbyists made him a top target of good-government groups. Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington labeled him one of the “most corrupt” members of Congress. Murtha gave no ground. “If I’m corrupt, it’s because I take care of my district,” he told the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette in March 2009. “My job as a member of Congress is to make sure that we take care of what we see is necessary.” As his congressional Web site put it, Murtha “has worked hard to bring tens of thousands of family-sustaining jobs to western Pennsylvania,” which had suffered “the widespread loss of coal and steel jobs that were the lifeblood of the area.” After Democrats won a majority of seats in the House in November 2006, Murtha ran for the No. 2 leadership post, majority leader, and was supported by Pelosi, the incoming House speaker. Murtha, who may have lost votes due to the allegations about his ethics, was defeated by Steny Hoyer of Maryland. ‘Racist Area’ Murtha won his 18th full term in 2008 even after seeming to insult his district by calling it “a racist area” where some voters might be reluctant to vote for Barack Obama . He later apologized. His committee was preparing to take up the latest war spending bill, which would fund the Obama administration’s troop buildup in Afghanistan. Murtha had expressed skepticism, saying in December he was “not sure that there’s a threat to our national security” in Afghanistan because al-Qaeda “can go any place — they don’t have to be in Afghanistan.” Murtha’s death likely creates another competitive race as Republicans try to retake the House in November. His district gave 49 percent of its vote to Obama in 2008 and 49 percent to Republican presidential nominee John McCain . John Patrick Murtha was born on June 17, 1932, in New Martinsville, West Virginia, and graduated from high school in Mount Pleasant, Pennsylvania. Drill Instructor He left Washington and Jefferson College in Washington, Pennsylvania, in 1952 to join the U.S. Marine Corps during the Korean War, serving until 1955 and becoming a drill instructor at Parris Island. In his second tour of active duty, in 1966 and 1967, he served in Vietnam as a Marine intelligence officer. His honors included a Bronze Star and two Purple Hearts. He was a reservist from 1952 to 1990 and retired from the Marine reserves as a colonel. He earned a degree in economics from the University of Pittsburgh in 1962. He began his political career as a member of Pennsylvania’s legislature from 1969 to 1974. The death of U.S. Representative John P. Saylor, a Republican, in 1973 forced a special election in February 1974 that was viewed as a referendum on the unpopular Republican president, Richard Nixon , then beset by problems including inflation and the emerging Watergate scandal. Backed by organized labor, Murtha won by just a few hundred votes. ‘Tip’ O’Neill House Speaker Thomas P. “Tip” O’Neill took a liking to Murtha and named him to the powerful Appropriations Committee. He became chairman of the defense subcommittee in 1989. Murtha was often called upon by congressional leaders and presidents to travel overseas to assess security challenges or monitor elections. In 1982, O’Neill sent Murtha to Beirut to review President Ronald Reagan’s decision to deploy U.S. Marines there as part of a multinational peacekeeping force. Murtha concluded the American troops were too vulnerable. “I’d like to get them out of here as soon as possible,” he told reporters. In 1992, he was a leading congressional critic of President George H.W. Bush’s decision to send U.S. troops to Somalia on a humanitarian mission. “The danger is we won’t be able to get them out,” Murtha warned. Murtha’s congressional Web site said of his role in the Somalia debate: “Although his advice was not heeded, history would prove him right.” Murtha and his wife, Joyce, had three children. To contact the reporter on this story: Laurence Arnold in Washington at larnold4@bloomberg.net

Read the full article →

Global real estate: Ready for a rebound?

January 25, 2010

The global real estate community is breathing easier than it was a year ago, judging by the sentiments of participants at a recent Knowledge@Wharton global real estate forum titled, ‘The Road to Recovery

Read the full article →

Global real estate: Ready for a rebound?

January 25, 2010

The global real estate community is breathing easier than it was a year ago, judging by the sentiments of participants at a recent Knowledge@Wharton global real estate forum titled, ‘The Road to Recovery

Read the full article →