largest

Akito Yoshikane: Airport Security Workers Prepare For Largest Federal Election in U.S. History

January 27, 2011

Transportation Security Administration (TSA) employees — i.e., the people that pat you down at the airport — are about to make history. When they vote to decide which union will represent them in March, it will be the largest federal labor election in U.S. history. Roughly 48,000 workers are set to vote starting March 9 on whether they will be represented by the American Federation of Government Employees (AFGE) or the National Treasury Employees Union (NTEU). While details are still emerging on whether the workers will be able to bargain collectively with the TSA, a successful election could help to bolster the country’s total unionization rate, which has now fallen to just 11.9 percent , as David Moberg reported for In These Times this week. Representatives from the TSA and both unions met with the Federal Labor Relations Authority last Friday to discuss terms of the election. AFGE, an AFL-CIO affiliate, has represented some workers since TSA was formed in 2001; it is the largest union in the federal government, with 600,00 workers. NTEU is the bargaining unit for 150,000 members across 31 agencies and departments. The election date is not yet finalized because the technical measures are still being ironed out by the TSA, according to Cathie McQuiston, AFGE membership and organization deputy director. “The agency is holding up finalizing the election terms because it seeks a bargaining unit description that departs from the norm,” said McQuiston . “There is no dispute over the bargaining unit positions, just the language used to describe the unit.” As it stands, TSA workers are permitted to join unions, but not allowed to bargain collectively. The labor organizing comes nearly a decade after TSA was created. Since then, unions have been trying to undo unfriendly measures that were enacted under the guise of national security. When the agency was created in 2001, Congress passed legislation allowing the Under-Secretary of Transportation to decide employment terms. A 2003 memo by that official prohibited workers from engaging in collective bargaining or using representation (i.e unions) to do so “in light of their critical national security responsibilities.” Most of the momentum has happened recently, due in part, as the Washington Post notes, to the rising productivity of the once stagnant Federal Labor Relations Authority. The agency, which oversees labor issues in the federal sector, decided in November that TSA members will be allowed to vote on union representation, paving the way for the elections. Now that employees are permitted to vote on who will be their exclusive representative, the focus has shifted to allow collective bargaining. Both unions have pressed the TSA to grant rights to do so, and are hoping for a decision before balloting begins. As the voting nears, the record-setting election is an anomaly at a time when unionization rates are continuing to fall. In 2009, unionized public sector workers outnumbered private sector employees for the first time, but the membership rate in 2010 for civil servants fell 1.2 percent to 36.2 percent. But the addition of airport security officials will boost more union members in the public sector, which totaled 7.6 million last year. The previous record for the largest federal union election was in 2006 when the NTEU prevailed over the AFGE for the right to represent 24,000 U.S Customs and Border Protection workers. NTEU won by a two-to-one margin, the union says . The unionization efforts have been opposed in the past, most notably by Senator Jim DeMint (R-S.C.). Today, the backlash has been amplified by opposition to public-sector unions. In Tuesday night’s State of the Union address, the invasive and tedious security precautions by the TSA was even the butt of a joke by President Obama. The stress of dealing with angry passengers has reportedly contributed to low morale among its workforce. The union will be expected to improve workplace standards and provide a voice for a workforce belonging to an agency under constant political scrutiny. (This post originally appeared in Working In These Times .)

Read the full article →

Dan Dorfman: The Man Who Turns Water Into Gold

January 22, 2011

When we’re young, we build castles in the sand. And when we grow up, some of us build empires. One fella intimately familiar with the empire-building process, a relatively unknown name to the masses, unlike such nationally known empire builders as Warren Buffett and Bill Gates, is 67-year-old Dick Heckmann. Not only has he done it before, but he’s busily engaged in pursuing an encore. “I want to be an $800 million gorilla again,” says Heckmann, a one-time Fuller brush man who’s convinced he’s off to a solid start in achieving that goal. The Old Testament says dream no small dreams, and that surely applies to our would-be gorilla, not only an achiever who dreams big, but one who doggedly follows up with the necessary action to make sure his dreams will come true. That was the case in 1990 when Heckmann, together with the aid of a secretary, founded United States Filter Corp., a New York Stock Exchange-listed company that treated waste water and water that went into manufactured products. Though the subsequent acquisition of 260 water firms and internal growth, he built a booming business with annualized revenues of $5 billion over the next nine years that was sold in 1999 to Vivendi for $8.2 billion. In the process, the sales of U.S. Filter under Heckmann’s leadership doubled every year for nine straight years, while the company’s shares ballooned from $0.75 to $33. So any investor who plunked down a few bucks on Heckmann wound up making a bundle as he literally turned water into gold. The latest project for Heckmann, who has amassed an estimated net worth of about $200 million, which includes a part ownership in the Phoenix Suns basketball team, is big board listed Heckmann Corp. Launched in November 2008 and headquartered in Palm Desert, CA., it buys and builds companies in the water sector. Once again, our empire builder is off and running. In a little more than two years, Heckman has developed a host of water-related businesses and has become a dominant player in water treatment related to energy (notably getting rid of excess water coming out of gas wells). Among the operations and investments are a 100% ownership of China Water & Drinks, one of the largest suppliers of water to Coca-Cola in China, a 100%-owned produced water pipeline and disposable company based in Tyler, Texas, a 50% ownership of a water solutions company, a joint venture between Heckman Corp. and big board-listed Energy Transfer Partners L.P., and a 7% stake in Underground Solutions, a supplier of PVC pipe with patented technologies. You can invest in chips, toys, cars and steel, Heckmann notes, and everyone knows the name of the biggest player. But not so, he points out, in water, which is probably a trillion-dollar business and is the only industry he knows in which he wouldn’t have to fight an 800-pound gorilla. Heckmann aims to fill the void. Within five years, he figures, his firm will be the largest independent pure water company in the U.S. and the only one at that time with annual sales of more than $1 billion. Maybe so, but he’s got a long way to go. In its first full operating year (2009), Heckmann Corp. posted sales of $35 million, accompanied by a whopping $395 million loss. Late last year, the company acquired a firm with $70 million of sales, raising overall volume to $105 million. Heckmann wouldn’t discuss 2011 prospects, but expectations in some quarters have it that the company, which is believed to have turned profitable in last year’s fourth quarter, will record $140 million in sales this year and an EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization) of about $20 million. At the moment, says Heckmann, the company has $200 million in cash, no debt and a team that has done it before (a reference to his hiring of a number of former U.S. Filter employees). An obvious question: Why, given his age and his hefty net worth, is Heckmann looking to build another empire? “Because,” he quipped, “I started playing golf, I’m never going to make the senior tour, and I love the water business.” Whether indeed Heckmann can pull off a spectacular encore is anybody’s guess. At least some market players are skeptical, as evidenced by the company’s stock performance (the firm went public at $8 a share, rose to as high as $10.74 and is now selling at $4.96). Likewise, there is a current short interest (a bet the stock price will fall) of more than 3 million of the company’s roughly 108 million shares outstanding. “Heckmann is a big maybe and this is the wrong environment for maybes,” says one short seller, who is making money on his Heckmann short position. Neil Weisman, a former hedge fund manager who ran Chilmark Capital between 1987 and 1993 and turned in some dazzling showings, disagrees. “Heckmann is only in the second inning,” says Weisman, who expects strong growth and the shares to trade north of $10 over the next 12 months. Apparently, he’s putting his money where his mouth is, reportedly holding, I’m told, somewhere between 2 and 3 million shares in his own personal account. As Weisman sees it, “H20 is the way to go and Heckmann is the best way to do it.” What do you think? E-mail me at Dandordan@aol.com .

Read the full article →

Kim Tillotson-Fleming Elected to Dollar Bank Board of Directors

January 18, 2011

Hefren-Tillotson Chairman Shares Community-Oriented Philosophy of the Country’s Largest Mutual Bank

Read the full article →

Video: Verizon Shows Phones, Tablets for Faster, 4G Network

January 7, 2011

Jan. 7 (Bloomberg) — Verizon Wireless, the largest U.S. mobile-phone carrier, unveiled 10 devices for its faster, fourth-generation network at the Consumer Electronics Show in Las Vegas, as wireless operators compete to introduce products that will attract and retain customers. Bloomberg’s Cris Valerio reports on the devices and Verizon Wireless Chief Executive Officer Daniel Mead’s remarks about the company’s outlook and Google Inc.’s Android operating system. (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

2010: A Year of Strategic Change and Growth For Commercial Brokerage Firms

January 6, 2011

Most commercial real estate brokerage and property services firms benefitted from a welcome increase in sales and leasing transaction activity in 2010 — and all indications are, that trend will continue in the New Year as the economy and demand continue to recover. The past year was also marked by a number of major consolidations and expansions among brokerage firms, and industry observers expect consolidation and growth by the largest players…

Read the full article →

Lease Up: Société Générale Leases 444,000 SF in NYC

January 3, 2011

Société Générale, France’s second largest bank, signed a new lease for 20 years for 444,000 square feet at 245 Park Ave., the largest leased signed in Manhattan in 2010. Société Générale’s lease will include floors three through 12. Occupancy is expected for mid-2013. The agreement also provides for a 20-year direct relationship with the building’s owner, Brookfield Properties. The original deal was a sublease from JPMorgan Chase. The 44…

Read the full article →

Updated: Google Closes Acquisition of One of NYC’s Largest Buildings for $1.8B

December 27, 2010

Google has completed its purchase of 111 Eighth Avenue, a 15-story brick building of nearly 3 million square feet in the Chelsea submarket of Manhattan, in a deal valued at about $1.8 billion. It’s the largest single-asset commercial real estate deal of 2010. Google had signed a contract to buy the building, a source close to the deal confirmed for CoStar early this month. It’s the largest single-asset commercial real estate deal of 2010. The…

Read the full article →

Shane Co. Announces Successful Emergence From Chapter 11 Reorganization

December 22, 2010

CENTENNIAL, CO–(Marketwire – December 21, 2010) – Shane Co ., the largest privately-held jeweler in the United States, today announced that the company has successfully completed its financial restructuring and has emerged from Chapter 11 reorganization.

Read the full article →

Downtown Miami Office Tower Trades for $105.5M

December 21, 2010

In a boost for the beleaguered Miami and South Florida economy and investment sale market, the 600,959-square-foot Miami Tower office building has traded for $105.5 million, or $175.55 per square foot. It’s the largest commercial real estate office sale of the year in Miami. I&G Miami, Inc. acquired the Class A downtown landmark at 100 SE 2nd St. from owner Blue Capital US East Coast Properties, L.P. in a deal that closed Friday. The iconic 47…

Read the full article →

HCP to Acquire Assets of HCR ManorCare In $6.1B Sale-Leaseback

December 14, 2010

In one of the largest commercial real estate transactions of the last several years, HCP Inc. (NYSE: HCP), the nation’s largest health-care REIT, said it will buy all the real estate assets of privately owned HCR ManorCare for $6.1 billion, including…

Read the full article →

HCP to Acquire Assets of HCR ManorCare In $6.1B Sale-Leaseback

December 14, 2010

In one of the largest commercial real estate transactions of the last several years, HCP Inc. (NYSE: HCP), the nation’s largest health-care REIT, said it will buy all the real estate assets of privately owned HCR ManorCare for $6.1 billion, including…

Read the full article →

First Wrecking Ball Drops on S.F.’s Transbay Terminal

December 7, 2010

Crews making way for the $4 billion Transbay Transit Center development, one of the largest public/private projects in the U.S., have started demolition of the old terminal in downtown San Francisco. Transbay Joint Powers Authority (TJPA) demolition…

Read the full article →

Google Acquires One of NYC’s Largest Buildings for $1.8B

December 6, 2010

Google has signed a contract to buy 111 Eighth Avenue, a 15-story brick building of nearly 3 million square feet in the Chelsea submarket of Manhattan, for more than $1.8 billion, a source close to the deal confirmed for CoStar. It’s the largest single…

Read the full article →

Google Acquires One of NYC’s Largest Buildings for $1.8B

December 6, 2010

Google has signed a contract to buy 111 Eighth Avenue, a 15-story brick building of nearly 3 million square feet in the Chelsea submarket of Manhattan, for more than $1.8 billion, a source close to the deal confirmed for CoStar. It’s the largest single…

Read the full article →

Video: Qwest’s Euteneuer Says Industry Consolidation Was Needed

November 19, 2010

Nov. 18 (Bloomberg) — Qwest Communications International Inc. Chief Financial Officer Joe Euteneuer talks about the company’s financial results, business strategy, and the acquisition by CenturyLink Inc. Qwest, which is preparing to be wrapped into CenturyLink to create one of the largest U.S. home-phone companies, said on Nov. 3 it posted third-quarter profit that beat analysts’ estimates after adding more subscribers to its Internet service. Euteneuer speaks with Carol Massar on Bloomberg Television. Bloomberg’s Julie Hyman also speaks. (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Video: Qwest’s Euteneuer Says Industry Consolidation Was Needed

November 19, 2010

Nov. 18 (Bloomberg) — Qwest Communications International Inc. Chief Financial Officer Joe Euteneuer talks about the company’s financial results, business strategy, and the acquisition by CenturyLink Inc. Qwest, which is preparing to be wrapped into CenturyLink to create one of the largest U.S. home-phone companies, said on Nov. 3 it posted third-quarter profit that beat analysts’ estimates after adding more subscribers to its Internet service. Euteneuer speaks with Carol Massar on Bloomberg Television. Bloomberg’s Julie Hyman also speaks. (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Retail Watch: Lack’s Lacks Cash, Closing Down Its 36 Stores

November 18, 2010

Lack’s Stores Inc., one of the largest independently owned retail furniture chains in the U.S. with 36 stores, is closing up shop. The Victoria, TX-based retailer filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy reorganization but in its filing said has not been able…

Read the full article →

Video: Yahoo Calls Blog Claim of 20% Job Cuts ‘Inaccurate’

November 12, 2010

Nov. 11 (Bloomberg) — Yahoo! Inc., the largest U.S. Web portal, said a report that the company will cut 20 percent of its staff isn’t accurate. The technology blog TechCrunch reported that Yahoo is preparing to lay off 20 percent of its total staff, citing two unnamed sources. Bloomberg’s Emily Chang reports. (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Carlo Cottarelli: How to Bake a (Cr)edible Medium-Term Fiscal Pie

November 4, 2010

How can governments have their cake and eat it too? How can fiscal policy provide sufficient support to economic activity, and reassure markets that fiscal solvency is not at risk? The poor state of fiscal accounts of most advanced countries calls for austere fiscal policies, before the confidence crisis that is now hitting a few small advanced economies spreads to the larger ones. But not right now: a frontloaded adjustment–that is a tightening that is not gradual but falls disproportionately early in the adjustment phase–could destabilize the recovery. But can countries limit frontloading and still achieve credibility? Yes, but baking the right fiscal pie is likely to require a number of ingredients. While the exact recipe depends on country circumstances, here are our suggested ingredients. 1. Fiscal rules For starters, countries can adopt rules to constrain their future behavior, with strong legislative backing and appropriately tough penalties in case of misbehavior. The truth however is that rules will help, but they are unlikely to be enough. For one thing, a fiscal rule that is appropriate for the long run–say, a structural balanced budget rule–cannot be immediately enforced when the starting point is, in many cases, a deficit close to double digits. A convergence period will be needed–as in the case of the Germany’s new fiscal rules, which targets a balanced structural balance only by 2016. And, to make that convergence credible, other ingredients are needed. 2. Multi-year spending limits Second, reasonable multi-year spending ceilings, endorsed not just by the government but also by parliament, will be crucial. In countries where spending ratios are high, a large part of the adjustment will have to come from spending restraint. This has been a feature of successful fiscal exits, such as in Sweden and Canada in the 1990s. It is missing in a number of countries, including the largest world economy. Here the difficulty is to reconcile the need for hard ceilings, which can not be easily revised, with a modicum of flexibility in case the recovery falters. This means that some items should be exempt from the ceilings, particularly expenditures that are cyclical like unemployment benefits, non-discretionary like interest payments, or fiscally neutral like EU-funded projects. It also requires ensuring that the legislative process for revising the ceilings (often annual and likely to be unavoidable at least for some spending items) does not turn into a free-for-all fiscal party. 3. Open and accountable budgeting This takes us to the third ingredient, fiscal transparency. Countries need to be transparent in formulating budgets and presenting them to the public. Markets and the public must be confident that medium-term plans, or changes to them, are justified by overriding macroeconomic considerations, and not, for example, by short-term political goals. They should also be confident that revenue projections–and the underlying growth assumptions–are not the result of wishful thinking. The best way to achieve this is to establish a politically-independent fiscal agent to monitor fiscal policy making. The United States has one, the Congressional Budget Office. Many European countries do not, although some, like Germany and the United Kingdom, have recently introduced them, following positive experiences in Nordic countries. For these newcomers, the test will be to show genuine independence. For the others (the two advanced countries with the largest debt-to-GDP ratios–Japan and Italy–do not have them yet) early action in this direction is urgently needed. Transparency also means providing the public with comprehensive information on the state of public finances. Surely advanced countries already do this, right? Not so. Of the nine advanced countries in the G-20, how many produce fiscal statistics covering the whole public sector–including the central bank, state mortgage guarantee institutions, and other publicly-owned corporations? Only three. How many of them publish alternative fiscal scenarios; that is, information not only about the fiscal baseline, but also on what happens if shocks (say, higher interest rates), materialize? Only five. How many publish adequate statements of tax expenditures (the revenue loss related to special tax treatment of certain sectors and activities)? Only four. (And what is the point of spending ceilings if they can be circumvented by granting tax deductions?) How many countries do all of the above? Only Canada. 4. Disciplined budget preparation and execution Next, countries need more disciplined budget preparation and execution processes. Budget preparation should be driven by the overall medium-term deficit and spending ceilings. That is, it must be “top down.” Budget execution should be underpinned by processes that minimize the risk of slippages. Here advanced countries fare relatively well. And yet, some further progress is needed, including in some European economies. The recipe. Just mix-and-bake? Finally, we come to the most difficult part: countries need some frontloaded measures to give some filling to the pie. Hang on! Did we not say that front-loading is wrong (except when failure to do so would make things even worse)? Here we need to distinguish between approval of the measures and their implementation. Frontloaded implementation would not be appropriate in most cases. But frontloading legislative decisions on measures that will take effect at a later date, or that will affect the economy gradually over time is definitely appropriate. For example, a partial or total freeze of turnover of retiring public employees falls in that category. Simple, isn’t it? Of course not, as otherwise it would have already been done. But it is easier than dealing with the consequences of living without a credible medium-term fiscal plan. A post-scriptum: All of the above is just to whet your appetite. What is just as interesting is to see how the medium-term fiscal adjustment plans announced over the last few months by major economies stack up against the above recipe. If you want to know more about this we suggest you savor our newly released Fiscal Monitor . The proof will be in the eating. From iMFdirect blog.

Read the full article →

Zilligen Named President at Ogilvy CommonHealth Specialty Marketing

November 4, 2010

PARSIPPANY, NJ–(Marketwire – November 4, 2010) – Ogilvy CommonHealth Worldwide ( www.ogilvychww.com ), representing the largest assembly of creative talent in the world of healthcare communications, today announced the appointment of Michael Zilligen as president of Ogilvy CommonHealth Specialty Marketing, the organization’s full-service advertising and promotion agency, focused on high-science and specialty markets.

Read the full article →

Major Publicly Traded CRE Brokerages Post Increased Revenue, Earnings On Rising Deal Velocity

November 4, 2010

Increasing property sales and leasing activity propelled three of the largest global commercial real estate services firms to higher revenues and profits in the third quarter. CB Richard Ellis Group Inc. (NYSE: CBG) reported third-quarter net income…

Read the full article →

Antitrust Suit Against Inbev, Anheuser-Busch Falls

October 28, 2010

ST. LOUIS — The latest quest by 10 Missouri beer consumers who tried to block InBev’s $52 billion takeover of U.S. beer giant Anheuser-Busch fell flat Wednesday when an appeals court refused to resurrect their antitrust lawsuit. A three-judge panel of the 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a federal judge’s decision to throw out the lawsuit last year. The suit claimed the 2008 merger of Belgium-based Inbev and St. Louis-based Anheuser-Busch – which created the world’s largest brewer – would diminish competition and raise beer prices. The panel suggested that allowing the lawsuit to go forward now could be counterproductive and fruitless. It was not immediately clear whether the plaintiffs planned more appeals. Messages left with several of their attorneys weren’t returned Wednesday. Federal regulators scrutinized the merger on antitrust grounds but ultimately signed off on it with few caveats. The deal was consummated in November 2008, two months after the group of self-described beer consumers sued. The lawsuit initially sought to block InBev’s acquisition of Anheuser-Busch, the maker of Budweiser that at the time controlled nearly half of the U.S. beer market. The suit cast the deal as a “plain violation” of federal antitrust law, among other things. If the deal went through, the lawsuit insisted, “the beer market in the United States would be controlled by absentee foreign owners (while) consumer welfare and choice and the benefits of competition would be substantially lessened and tend toward the creation of a monopoly.” The suit also claimed that “the constant threat of InBev, the largest brewer in the world, to enter the market” substantially affects the market behavior of Anheuser-Busch and other U.S. brewers. U.S. District Judge Jean Hamilton wasn’t swayed, siding with InBev and Anheuser-Busch when she tossed out the lawsuit in August 2009. In upholding Hamilton’s decision, the 8th Circuit suggested that allowing the lawsuit to go forward could be counterproductive to plaintiffs’ mission. Judge James Loken wrote in the panel’s ruling that a court degree ordering the companies to split would hurt not only employees and distributors, but “damage competition and consumers by crippling the operations of the largest domestic producer of immensely popular products.” Loken also noted that any price benefit for beer drinkers was unclear. Katherine Barrett, Anheuser-Busch Cos. Inc.’s senior associate general counsel, said the brewer welcomed Wednesday’s ruling against “this meritless lawsuit” bearing claims that were “unsupported and speculative.” The deal, in passing regulatory muster, followed the Justice Department’s demand that InBev sell Labatt USA, which sold its Canadian beer in the U.S. “The merger did not increase concentration or adversely affect competition in the U.S. market, and was in full compliance with (federal antitrust law),” Barrett said in a statement. The lawsuit and the deal it sought to scuttle came against the backdrop of an already consolidating U.S. brewing sector. In mid-2008, London-based SABMiller PLC and Molson Coors Brewing Co., based in Denver, combined their U.S. and Puerto Rico operations into MillerCoors, a month after the Justice Department concluded the joint venture wouldn’t reduce competition. In the months before its merger, InBev insisted that what ultimately became Anheuser-Busch InBev would not violate antitrust laws because it would combine breweries that operate in different geographic markets.

Read the full article →

Lease Down: Nation’s Foreclosure Mess Takes Toll on Process Servers

October 20, 2010

DJSP Enterprises Inc., one of the largest provider of processing services for the mortgage and real estate industries in Florida and one of the largest in the United States, instituted staff reductions as a result of reduced file volumes. DJSP has…

Read the full article →

Lease Up: Intel, GE To Bolster U.S. Manufacturing Operations

October 20, 2010

Two U.S. Fortune 500 manufacturing firms announced plans this week to expand their U.S. operations: GE and Intel Corp. Intel Corp. announced the largest investment plans expecting to spend between $6 billion and $8 billion on future generations of…

Read the full article →

Michael Hudson: 16 Cents on the Dollar: Doing the Math on Angelo Mozilo’s Big Settlement

October 19, 2010

In the end, Angelo Mozilo settled for pennies on the dollar. The former Countrywide Financial Corp. chief agreed Friday to a settlement that requires him to pay 16 cents out of his own pocket for every dollar federal authorities claimed he had taken out of the company in ill-gotten personal gains. Let’s do the math: ■ The government alleged that he added $141.7 million (before taxes) to his personal fortune through corporate misconduct. ■ Mozillo agreed to personally pay a $22.5 million fine — 16 percent of the alleged ill-gotten gains. ■ In addition, Mozillo agreed to turn over another $45 million to former Countrywide shareholders, who lost billions when the company’s stock price plummeted as loan defaults soared. But the $45 million won’t come out of Mozilo’s pocket. Under the terms of his employment contract, it will be paid instead by Countrywide’s insurers and by Bank of America, which bought Countrywide in 2008. The government settled the civil fraud and insider trading allegations against Mozilo for less than it wanted because, one legal analyst said, it would have been a challenge to prove its case. “This is not a slam dunk,” Duke University law professor James D. Cox told The New York Times . “It’s a risky case and it’s got a lot of complexities to it.” Mozilo admitted no wrongdoing, and his lawyers were sure to have mounted a ferocious defense. The Securities and Exchange Commission said the $22.5 million fine will be the largest penalty ever paid by a senior executive of a public company in an SEC settlement. Too Easy? But some observers wonder whether Mozilo got off easy. David Callahan, author of the book, The Cheating Culture: Why More Americans Are Doing Wrong to Get Ahead , writes : It is hard to see how the Mozilo settlement — coming on the heels of another weak SEC settlement with financier Steve Rattner — will deter future wrongdoing. . . . Indeed, it could have the contrary effect. If you can make a great fortune behaving badly, get busted, and still end up with most of that [fortune], then you’ve come out way ahead. At least in financial terms. Countywide reaped huge profits — and, eventually, produced huge losses for its shareholders — through a high-wire strategy that focused on selling huge volumes of subprime loans and other risky products. One of the ironies of Countrywide’s fall was that Mozilo had been hesitant, at first, to jump into the subprime market. As I write in my new book about the subprime debacle, The Monster , Mozilo and Countrywide eventually succumbed to the temptation to follow the example of Ameriquest Mortgage Co. and its billionaire owner, Roland Arnall, an entrepreneur who was in many ways the founding father of subprime. The inventive mortgage products emerging in the home-loan market were watched closely by the heaviest of the industry’s heavyweights: Countrywide Financial’s Angelo R. Mozilo. Mozilo’s company had established itself as the largest mortgage lender in America by providing loans to home owners with good credit. Mozilo called his company “my baby.” For much of his career, he had been cautious about the kinds of loans his company made. Countrywide had mostly steered clear of subprime as other lenders dived into the market throughout the 1990s. Mozilo worried that subprime loans were too risky, in some cases even “toxic.” … While Ameriquest’s methods may have made Mozilo uneasy, he wasn’t so troubled that he kept Countrywide from joining the subprime gold rush. His company had survived decades of real-estate booms and busts, and he thought it had the brains and brawn to handle the risks of subprime better than the upstarts. Mozilo’s competitive instincts beat out his caution. He couldn’t accept being second or third. “It’s a question of dominance,” he told investors. He didn’t like that Countrywide trailed Ameriquest in the subprime lending rankings. By 2003 Arnall’s companies had captured nearly 12 percent of the subprime market; Countrywide did barely half as much subprime volume, with a market share of just 6 percent. Besides, the real money in the mortgage business was now in subprime, not in prime loans. When Countrywide sold prime loans to investors, its average profit margin was 0.93 percent; when it sold subprime loans to investors, the company’s profit margin nearly quadrupled, to 3.64 percent. The fees, interest rates, and prepayment penalties embedded in subprime loans made them much more seductive to investors. Countrywide’s Size, Clout Though Mozilo’s company came late to the party, once it was there, its size and clout deepened the pain that subprime visited upon home owners and the financial system. Countrywide did little to pull back on its subprime push, even in 2006, when there were signs of an impending crash. “You have to make a choice: to get out or not. And they stayed,” a longtime mortgage industry watcher told the Los Angeles Times . “It’s hard when you’re following someone off a cliff to know when to stop.” In early 2008, Bank of America purchased Countrywide, once worth as much as $26 billion, for a fire-sale price of $4 billion. Countrywide might have survived if its founder hadn’t become fixated on competing with Ameriquest, Muolo, the National Mortgage News editor, said. “If he hadn’t followed Roland Arnall down the subprime path this would never have happened,” Muolo said. “It’s ego and ambition that sunk him.” Michael Hudson is a staff writer with the Center for Public Integrity and author of The Monster: How a Gang of Predatory Lenders and Wall Street Bankers Fleeced America — and Spawned a Global Crisis (Times Books, October 2010).

Read the full article →

Harvard Business School Receives $50M Gift From Indian Conglomerate

October 14, 2010

BOSTON — Harvard Business School has received a $50 million gift from India’s Tata Group, the largest gift from a foreign donor in the school’s 102-year history. Harvard says the gift from the international conglomerate will fund a new academic and residential building on the business school’s Boston campus for its executive education programs. Ratan Tata, chairman of Tata Sons Ltd. and a graduate of the school’s advanced management program, made the announcement Thursday with business school Dean Nitin Nohria and Boston Mayor Thomas Menino. Harvard hopes to break ground next spring for the new Tata Hall.

Read the full article →

Video: Sorrentino Says Banks Need Access to Foreclosed Assets: Video

October 11, 2010

Oct. 11 (Bloomberg) — Frank Sorrentino, chairman and chief executive officer at North Jersey Community Bank, talks about the possible impact of a halt in home foreclosures at the largest U.S. mortgage firms on the housing market. Sorrentino talks with Matt Miller and Carol Massar on Bloomberg Television’s “Street Smart.” (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Video: Foreclosure Freeze May Sideline U.S. Homebuyers: Video

October 11, 2010

Oct. 11 (Bloomberg) — A halt in home foreclosures at the largest U.S. mortgage firms may sideline buyers worried about legal issues, further depressing sales at a time when distressed properties account for almost a quarter of all transactions. Bloomberg’s Monica Bertran reports. (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

PepTcell Appoints Manfred Scheske as CEO of Consumer Health

October 11, 2010

Bringing Innovation to Two of the Largest OTC Consumer Markets With Breakthrough New Products

Read the full article →

JP Morgan Sells Crystal City Office Bldgs. for $242M

October 7, 2010

In one of the largest office deals in the Washington, DC, area this year, JP Morgan Strategic Properties Fund sold a 621,824-square-foot, two-building office complex known as One and Two Potomac Yard in the Crystal City area of Arlington, VA, to a fund…

Read the full article →

Video: Irish Unemployed May See More Budget Cuts Before Jobs

October 1, 2010

Oct. 1 (Bloomberg) — Bloomberg’s David Tweed reports from Dublin on unemployment in Ireland and the prospects for an economic rebound as the government tackles the largest budget deficit in the history of the euro region.

Read the full article →

Video: Bloomberg’s Stein Says Financial Crisis Aided Vanguard: Video

September 29, 2010

Sept. 29 (Bloomberg) — Bloomberg’s Charles Stein talks to Mark Crumpton and Julie Hyman about the shift by investors into index funds that helped Vanguard Group Inc. snatch the No. 1 ranking as the largest U.S. mutual-fund company by assets from Fidelity Investments. (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Video: Bank of America May Cut More Than 20 Prop Trading Jobs: Video

September 29, 2010

Sept. 29 (Bloomberg) — Bank of America Corp., the largest U.S. bank, is eliminating between 20 and 30 proprietary trading jobs to comply with Volcker rule limits on banks trading their own capital, according to a person briefed on the decision. Bloomberg’s Christine Harper reports. (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Prolifics Promotes Robyn Dixon to Strategic Alliance Manager

September 28, 2010

NEW YORK, NY–(Marketwire – September 28, 2010) –  Prolifics, the largest end-to-end systems integrator specializing in IBM technologies, today announced that it has promoted Robyn Dixon to the new role of Strategic Alliance Manager. The new position expands on Ms. Dixon’s current channel relationship responsibilities to include overall management of Prolifics’ alliances and participating programs. Additionally, the role includes managing Prolifics’ relationships with distributor Avnet; overseeing IBM’s Software Value Plus (SVP) reseller program; extending IBM alliance support in UK and Germany; extending IBM alliance support for all of SemanticSpace group including both Arsin and SST; and growing relationships with new business partners.

Read the full article →

Boston Properties Wins Major GSA Lease, Signs Defense Intelligence Agency to 523,500 SF in Metro DC

September 21, 2010

In one of the largest office leases signed in Virginia this year, the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) signed a 523,482-square-foot, 20-year lease at Boston Properties’ Patriots Park office development in Reston, VA. The group, a combat support agency…

Read the full article →

Lloyd Chapman: Obama Jobs Bill Could be Job Killer for Small Businesses

September 15, 2010

Obama Jobs Bill Could Slash Contracting Opportunities for Small Businesses President Barack Obama’s small business jobs bill contains a dangerous loophole that could encourage billions of dollars in fraud in small business contracting programs, and protect fraudulent companies from prosecution. The bill is currently pending in the U.S. Senate. Section 1341 of H.R. 5297, the Small Business Jobs Act, contains provisions that would allow the Small Business Administration (SBA) to develop policies and procedures that would protect large businesses that have misrepresented themselves as small businesses from prosecution for felony contracting fraud. Since 2003, over a dozen federal investigations have found billions of dollars a month in federal small business contracts have been diverted to Fortune 500 firms, large businesses throughout the U.S. and some of the largest companies in Europe. In 2005, the SBA Office of Inspector General (SBA IG) referred to the diversion of federal small business contracts to large businesses as, “One of the most important challenges facing the Small Business Administration and the entire Federal government today.” In Report 5-16, the SBA IG found that large businesses had received federal small business contracts fraudulently by making “false certifications” and “improper certifications.” Section 1341 of President Obama’s jobs bill would give the SBA a blank check to develop policies that could protect large corporations from prosecution under the law. Section 16(d) of the Small Business Act prescribes a penalty of up to ten years in prison and a fine of not more than $500,000 per occurrence for firms that have misrepresented themselves as small businesses. For over a decade, the SBA has attempted to cover-up flagrant abuses in the program by claiming they were the result of miscoding and computer glitches. In one case, Pevco, a Baltimore based small business began losing small business contracts to one of the largest companies in Switzerland. Pevco Chairman Fred Valerino Sr. contacted his congressman, and the SBA responded by claiming that Translogic Corporation received 147 small business contracts over a six-year period “accidentally.” The harm done to small businesses by Section 1341, would greatly outweigh any minor benefit the other provisions of the bill might provide. This paragraph could legalize billions of dollars in federal contracting fraud and be tantamount to repealing the small business act. We are going to do everything we can to block this section of the bill. It would only encourage fraud and abuse, divert more federal funds away from legitimate small businesses, and cost America jobs.

Read the full article →

Video: Bloomberg’s Chu on Cisco, Microsoft Dividend Plans: Video

September 14, 2010

Sept. 14 (Bloomberg) — Bloomberg’s Dominic Chu talks with Melissa Long about the importance of dividend-paying stocks to some investors and the outlook for dividends from Cisco Systems Inc. and Microsoft Corp. Cisco, the largest maker of networking equipment, plans to initiate the company’s first dividend this fiscal year. Microsoft is planning to sell debt this year to pay for dividends and share repurchases according to a person familiar with the matter. (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Robert Reich: The Two Categories of American Corporation — and Why it Matters

September 12, 2010

Some giant American corporations depend on a buoyant American economy and a world-class industrial base in the United States. Others are far less dependent. What comes out of Washington in the next few years will reflect which group has most political clout — especially if Republicans take over the House and capture more of the Senate this November. The first group includes national telecoms like Verizon and AT&T that need a prosperous America because most of their sales are here. Same with finance companies like Bank of America and Travelers Insurance whose business strategy has been built around U.S. consumers. Ditto for certain giant chains like Home Depot. Naturally, all these companies were especially hard hit by the Great Recession and its devastating impact on American consumers. The second group includes companies like Coca Cola, Exxon-Mobil, Hewlett-Packard, Intel, and McDonald’s, that get substantial revenues from their overseas operations. Increasingly this means China, India, and Brazil. Ford and GM are still largely dependent on US sales but becoming less so. GM sold more cars in China last year than in the US. Not surprisingly, American companies that are less dependent on American consumers have been showing the biggest profits. Wall Street gets this. Viewing the 30 giants that make up the Dow Jones Industrial Average, analysts are predicting that the 10 with the largest portion of sales inside the U.S. will show average revenue gains of just 1.6 percent over the next year, while the 10 with the largest portion of their sales abroad will grow by an average of 8.3 percent. So what does this mean for politics? Big companies hedge their bets and support both Republicans and Democrats. But in my experience, companies in the first group are more responsive to tax, spending, and monetary policies that cause unemployment to drop and wages to grow, and less obsessed by inflation and deficits, than are companies in the second group. The former are also more supportive of new investments in infrastructure and education, which improve U.S. productivity over the longer term. The problem is that more and more big companies are moving into the second category because that’s where the markets and the money are. Years ago groups like the Business Roundtable consisted mostly of large American corporations that were indubitably American, and took largely progressive positions on U.S. jobs and wages. I remember working with the National Association of Manufacturers on measures to improve U.S. education and job training. The American Electronics Association pushed the Reagan Administration for an industrial policy to preserve the nascent industrial base of U.S. computing. No longer. Large American corporations are going global as fast as they can. That’s good for their shareholders. But in a Washington ever more susceptible to their money and influence, that’s not necessarily good for most Americans. This post originally appeared at RobertReich.org .

Read the full article →

Orrin Hatch Compares Obama To Bernie Madoff When It Comes To Fixing Economy

September 9, 2010

Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-Utah) drew an unusual and harsh comparison on Wednesday in taking aim at President Obama over a new stimulus plan proposed by his administration to boost economic recovery. In a statement put out by the six-term incumbent, Hatch likened Obama to disgraced investment adviser Bernie Madoff — who is currently serving a 150-year prison sentence after pleading guilty to one of the largest Ponzi schemes in history. “I don’t think anyone believes an Administration that created these problems is going to be able to come up with effective solutions to get us out of them,” said the Republican Senator. “That’s like putting Bernie Madoff in charge of fixing your company’s broken accounting system.” Despite the criticism, a USA Today/Gallup poll released last week found that 71 percent of Americans say that former President George W. Bush is to blame for the economic downturn that continues to adversely impact the country.

Read the full article →

Lan And Tam In Merger Talks

September 9, 2010

The potential merger could create the largest airline in South America

Read the full article →

Dean Baker: Ben Bernanke’s Trifecta of Errors

September 9, 2010

Many have noted the resemblance between the Federal Reserve Board and the Catholic Church. Both have long traditions of secret convocations: meetings of the Open Market Committee and the College of Cardinals. Both have a revered leader: the Chair of the Board of Governors and the Pope. And both have claims to infallibility. OK, it is only the Pope who can explicitly claim infallibility. In the case of the Fed Chair, infallibility is bestowed by the business reporters and politicians who treat every word from the reigning Fed chair as a priceless pearl of wisdom. This aura of infallibility is especially painful in the current economic situation when error seems to be the new religion of the Fed. Just to remind everyone – since so much denial has dominated the debate – the only reason that we are facing near double-digit unemployment and the worst economic calamity in 70 years is that the Fed was out to lunch in combating the housing bubble. The Fed was apparently unable to recognize a massive and unexplained departure from a 100-year-long trend in the largest market in the world as a bubble. Even after they had just seen the stock bubble grow and implode they still could not conceive of a bubble in the housing market. Bernanke and other spokespeople for the Fed have also claimed that there was nothing that they could have done even if they did recognize the bubble. Call this colossal error number one. This is drunkenly driving the school bus into the lane of oncoming traffic killing all aboard. In most lines of work, you would be fired immediately and barred from ever working again. For the Fed chairman this is just a bad break. Having missed the largest financial bubble in the history of the world, Bernanke quickly moved to colossal error number two, failing to take adequate steps to counteract the downturn. While Bernanke deserves credit for being more aggressive than some of the quacks who would have just let the financial system melt down completely, his response to mass unemployment has been woefully inadequate. The Fed should be targeting a higher rate of inflation in the 3-4 percent range. This would reduce real interest rates and debt burdens. What is the downside in this picture; inflation accelerates too much and hits 5-6 percent? How does that compare to years of excessive unemployment with millions of people unemployed or underemployed needlessly? No reasonable calculation of costs and risks would justify Bernanke’s timidity in the current circumstances. Bernanke’s third colossal error is playing along with the deficit fervor being promoted by those seeking to gut Social Security, Medicare and other areas of social spending. The downturn has predictably led to an explosion of the deficit, as public spending had to fill the gap created by the collapse of private spending. However there is no reason whatsoever why this deficit should place any burden on the long-term federal budget. A responsible Fed chairman would announce his intention to simply buy and hold the government debt used to finance the deficit. This would prevent the debt from placing any future burden on the public budget since the interest payments on the debt would go to the Fed. The Fed would in turn refund the interest to the Treasury each year, leaving no net interest burden on the government. Japan’s central bank currently holds an amount of public debt that is almost equal to its GDP ($14.5 trillion in the case of the United States). As a result, Japan’s interest burden is less than that of the United States even though its ratio of debt to GDP is 220 percent, almost four times the ratio in the United States. If Bernanke were honestly doing his job he would be educating the public about why debt run up to counteract a downturn need not impose a burden on the budget. Instead, he is running around telling Congress to cut Social Security because “that’s where the money is.” The country is paying an enormous cost for Bernanke’s trifecta of errors. In any other line of work any one of these errors would be huge enough to have someone drummed out of the profession. But the Fed has more in common with the Catholic Church than it does with normal institutions. As a result, Pope Bernanke is really messing up big time, yet he is still being allowed to wear the mantle of infallibility and the rest of us are being forced to suffer the consequences. (from the Guardian)

Read the full article →

Lloyd Chapman: New Obama Policy Won’t End Diversion of Federal Small Business Funds to Corporate Giants

September 8, 2010

President Barack Obama presented his new economic stimulus plan in Ohio today. One thing he said really caught my attention. “You elected me to do what is right,” he said. I think if President Obama would “do what is right” for small businesses, it would create more jobs than anything he or anyone in Congress has proposed to date. Of course, I’m talking about ending the diversion of over $100 billion a year in federal small business contracts to corporate giants around the world. Since 2003, over a dozen federal investigations have found billions of dollars a month in federal small business contracts actually wind up in the hands of many of the largest businesses in the world. Some of the firms that have received federal small business contracts include: Lockheed Martin, Boeing, Raytheon, L-3 Communications, British Aerospace (BAE), Northrop Grumman, General Electric and Dell Computer. The diversion of federal small business contracts to large businesses is such a severe problem, that the Small Business Administration Office of Inspector General (SBA IG) referred to it as “One of the most important challenges facing the Small Business Administration and the entire Federal government today…” President Obama recognized the magnitude of the problem during his campaign when he released the statement, “It is time to end the diversion of federal small business contracts to corporate giants.” We don’t have to spend another $50 billion on infrastructure projects, and another $200 billion in tax cuts to create jobs. Why don’t we just quit giving billions of dollars a month in federal small business contracts to some of the largest corporations in the world? You don’t have to be a Nobel Prize winning economist to figure this out. According to the U.S. Census Bureau, small businesses create over 90 percent of all net new jobs. Federal law requires a minimum of 23 percent of all federal contracts to be awarded to small businesses. With an actual federal acquisition budget of over $1 trillion, American small businesses should be receiving at least $230 billion a year in federal contracts. The Obama Administration is only claiming to have awarded $96 billion to small business during fiscal year (FY) 2009, and most of that money actually went to large corporations. An analysis by the American Small Business League (ASBL) found that of the top 100 recipients of federal small businesses contracts reported by the Obama Administration, 60 were actually large businesses, and those firms received 65 percent of the dollars awarded to the top 100. It looks like small businesses are actually receiving roughly $35 billion a year. That’s approximately $195 billion less than the law requires. If President Obama would simply insure that the federal law, which requires that small businesses receive a minimum of 23 percent of all federal contracts, was fully enforced, it would create more new jobs than anything he has ever proposed. Ask any economist what the impact of redirecting $195 billion a year in existing federal infrastructure spending into the middle class will have on job creation. The Senate Small Business Committee found that every 1 percent increase in federal contracts to small businesses would create 100,000 new jobs. Increasing federal contracts for small businesses from $35 billion to $230 billion would create over 2 million new jobs. The best part of redirecting federal small business contracts away from large businesses and back to legitimate small businesses is… it’s free. No new taxes, no new spending. You can’t beat a deficit neutral stimulus program that will actually create millions of net new jobs. All of the programs the Obama Administration has proposed are one-time programs. Redirecting existing federal infrastructure spending to America’s 27 million small businesses, which create over 90 percent of net new jobs will work year-after-year for years to come. Now here’s the best part, this can be accomplished without any new legislation. President Obama can issue an executive order simply directing that no federal small business contracts will be awarded to large businesses. He could also direct the SBA to immediately abolish federal policies that have allowed corporate giants from around the world to hijack federal small business contracts. In closing, what’s not to love here? An economic stimulus program that will shift billions of dollars in existing federal infrastructure spending directly into the hands of the small businesses where most Americans work; the very firms that create over 50 percent of the gross domestic product (GDP), over 90 percent of all U.S. exports and create over 90 percent of all net new jobs. A program that is deficit neutral that can be implemented immediately with out any new legislation. Now the sad truth… President Obama is not going to “do the right thing” here. This perfect stimulus plan has no hope of ever being implemented. Why? Because it won’t help the unions, and it won’t help any of President Obama’s biggest campaign contributors. The Fortune 500 firms that currently receive billions of dollars in federal small business contracts will also spend as much as it takes kill it. Too bad… double-dip here we come.

Read the full article →

Video: BP Report Says Many Factors Caused Macondo Oil Spill: Video

September 8, 2010

Sept. 8 (Bloomberg) — BP Plc faulted its own engineers for a fatal drilling disaster that triggered the largest U.S. oil spill and said rig owner Transocean Ltd. and contractor Halliburton Co. also must shoulder some of the blame. Bloomberg’s Ryan Chilcote reports. (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Video: BP Report Says Many Factors Caused Macondo Oil Spill: Video

September 8, 2010

Sept. 8 (Bloomberg) — BP Plc faulted its own engineers for a fatal drilling disaster that triggered the largest U.S. oil spill and said rig owner Transocean Ltd. and contractor Halliburton Co. also must shoulder some of the blame. Bloomberg’s Ryan Chilcote reports. (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Health Insurer PacifiCare Faces Up To $9.9 Billion In Fines For Nearly A Million Alleged Health Care Violations

September 7, 2010

California regulators are seeking fines of up to $9.9 billion from health insurer PacifiCare over allegations that it repeatedly mismanaged medical claims, lost thousands of patient documents, failed to pay doctors what they were owed and ignored calls to fix the problems. In court filings and other documents, the California Department of Insurance says PacifiCare violated state law nearly 1 million times from 2006 to 2008 after it was purchased by UnitedHealth Group Inc., the nation’s largest health insurance company by revenue. Regulators said the companies broke promises to maintain smooth operations for 130,000 of PacifiCare’s customers, resulting in what insurance officials nationwide believe is the largest fine ever sought against a U.S. health insurer.

Read the full article →

Employers Pushing Health Care Cost Increases Onto Workers, Report Shows

September 2, 2010

As employers struggle with rising healthcare costs and a sour economy, U.S. workers for the first time in at least a decade are being asked to shoulder the entire increase in the cost of health benefits on their own. The average worker with a family plan was hit with 14% premium increase this year, pushing the bill to nearly $4,000 a year, according to a survey by the nonprofit Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation and the Health Research and Educational Trust. That is the largest annual increase since the survey began in 1999 and a marked change from previous years, when employers generally split the rise in the cost of premiums with their employees.

Read the full article →