million-barrels

Huffington Post…

If the Western military intervention in Libya is really being driven by oil, maybe it’s time to think again. History says regime change is never bullish for oil production in the Middle East and even less so for oil exports. Iran and Iraq, two of the larger producers in the region, are cases in point. While no one misses the Shah’s regime, Iran and the rest of the world still miss the oil production and the oil exports his regime once produced. At the height of the Shah’s power, Iran was pumping out six million barrels a day. Today, 32 years after the Iranian revolution sent Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi and his cronies packing, Iran barely produces four million barrels a day. Exports have fallen even more than production. During the Shah’s reign, Iran consumed less than a million barrels a day, leaving over five million barrels for daily export. Today, thanks to decades of massive fuel price subsidies, domestic oil consumption has almost doubled, leaving only two million barrels a day for export — or 40% of the export volumes prior to the Iranian revolution. Iraq’s experience should give Western allies no more confidence in their Libyan mission than the Iranian one. Prior to the invasion of Kuwait and the trade sanctions it triggered, Saddam Hussein’s Iraq produced around three million barrels a day in the late-1980s. Since then, oil production has never been close to that level. When the Americans invaded Iraq in 2003, the U.S. Department of Energy confidently predicted the country would be throwing its arms open to foreign investment and the oil sector would be producing over four million barrels per day by 2010. Instead, the Sunni insurgency broke out and a whole lot of pipelines (and people) started getting blown up. Oil production plunged, and it has taken almost a decade to get production back to pre-invasion two and a half million pace. What will happen in Libya is still anyone’s guess. Will a defeated Muammar Gadhafi try to blow up the oil fields like Saddam Hussein did on his forced retreat from Kuwait? Will oil production and oil installations simply collapse as collateral damage in a protracted civil war that partitions the country? Or will a new regime take over and prove to be as dysfunctional as its predecessor or less inclined to develop the country’s oil reserves? Whatever happens, both the Iranian and Iraqi experience suggest a post -Gadhafi Libya will produce less, not more, oil. Of course, maybe the missing 1.3 million barrels of oil exports from the country have nothing to do with why we are in Libya. Maybe it is just a humanitarian mission after all. But if protecting defenseless populations from Middle Eastern dictators is what this is all about, why aren’t we intervening in Bahrain, Yemen and Syria as well?

The rest is here:
Jeffrey Rubin: Regime Change Not Bullish for Oil Production in the Middle East

Find our Weekly Commercial Real Estate, Private Equity and Fund Newsletters at www.WeeklyBrief.net

{ 0 comments }

The International Energy Agency needn’t bother exhorting OPEC to pump more oil to fuel a global economy that now burns a record 87 million barrels a day. Confidential cables from the U.S. embassy in Saudi Arabia released recently by WikiLeaks confirm what others have long suspected: OPEC’s kingpin producer, Saudi Arabia, has little more to give. The cables from the U.S. embassy in Riyadh cites a number of conversations between embassy personnel and Dr. Sadad Al Husseini , a geologist and former executive vice president of Exploration and Production with Aramco, the Saudi oil monopoly. The former Aramco exploration head contends neither the kingdom’s reserve estimates nor future production targets can be believed. According to Husseini, Aramco’s estimates of its world-leading reserves are inflated by 40%. More important, Dr. Husseini acknowledged Saudi production is never likely to get to Aramco’s 12.5 million barrel per day level target. Instead the country is struggling to produce even 10 million barrels a day and it may soon encounter a production peak after which flow rates will inevitably decline. Yet the International Energy Agency is counting on Saudi Arabia to produce no less than 14.6 million barrels a day by 2035. Dr. Husseini’s revealing assessment of the Saudi oil industry goes a long way in explaining why President Bush’s personal pilgrimage there in 2008 during the height of the last oil crisis was only able to elicit a token 300,000 barrel a day production increase. Other than a limited amount of heavy oil that many of the world’ s refineries can’t process, the Kingdom has little more to offer today. Chronic delays in new development and over reporting of reserves by Aramco, paints an illuminating picture of an oil industry that has struggled merely to keep up with depletion. Production is still below the levels reached in the 1970s. And thanks to the Saudi economy’s voracious appetite for its own massively subsidized oil, less of its near-peak production is available for export every year. While the U.S. embassy cables acknowledge Saudi Arabia still has the capacity to raise prices should it withhold supply, it no longer has the capacity to prevent prices from rising because it can’t boost production sufficiently to meet world demand. If Saudi Arabia no longer has an ability to raise production, who does? Still, one way or another the global oil industry will have to produce six million barrels per day more oil than last year to offset the four million barrels per day that is lost to depletion each year, and the nearly two million barrels per day of new crude demand that another year of global economic growth will generate. (Last year, Chinese oil demand alone increased by almost one million barrels a day). If that supply can’t be found, there is only one solution: Higher oil prices will be needed to ration the ever-growing global fuel demand.

Visit link:
Jeffrey Rubin: WikiLeaks Reveals Imminent Saudi Oil Peak

{ 0 comments }

Raymond J. Learsy: Risks to the Suez Canal Set the Stage for Falsely Hyping the Price of Oil

February 6, 2011

Over the past days, the airwaves and talking heads have been frightening us with somber predictions of what would happen to the price of oil should current events in Egypt shutter the canal. The oil boys and their allies can barely contain themselves in their appearances of concern and like minded predictions of calamity, such as today’s Reuters report quoting Imad al-Atiqi, member of Kuwait’s Supreme Petroleum Council — “I expect oil to reach $110 during the first half of 2011… A huge amount of oil passes through the Suez Canal…” thereby ever nudging oil prices skyward with Brent Crude already surpassing $100 a barrel. Yet has anyone stopped to determine what the closure of the Suez Canal would actually mean to the oil market in dollars and cents? In the shipping world the type of vessel that can transit the Suez Canal has its own designation, named a “Suezmax” category. The typical deadweight of a Suezmax oil tanker is about 240,000 tonnes. Now, approximately 7.1 barrels of oil make up one metric tonne. Therefore a 240,000 tonnes deadweight tanker carries some 1.7 million barrels of oil. According to the New York Times , “Taking cargo around Africa would add about 16 days time to delivering oil to world markets.” Calculating a per diem charter rate for a Suezmax tanker at $50,000 per day (and probably less), brings the additional cost of transporting a cargo of oil, lifting 1.7 million barrels around Africa to $800,000 per voyage. More to the point, the additional cost per barrel of oil would be 47 cents per barrel. And these 47 cents would apply only to the some 1.8 million barrels of crude oil that are transported through the canal (an additional 2mm plus barrels can be transported through Egypt overland via the Sumed pipeline). The additional cost of $800,000 for transporting these 1.8 million barrels around the horn of Africa, distributed over the world’s daily consumption of oil of 85 million barrels, would settle out at just under a penny per barrel. All said, the additional 16 days would be a problem if the oil market were in a state of hand to mouth. Fortuitously, oil stocks are bulging throughout the world and the sixteen days additional steaming time can be easily accommodated with ample leeway to alter delivery schedules factoring in these changed logistics. Clearly, the closing of the Suez Canal to the oil trade would be a hindrance but hardly the disaster portrayed in the media and our friends at OPEC.

Read the full article →

Oil Rises To 26-Month High Above $90 On U.S. Supply Forecast

December 7, 2010

Oil climbed above $90 a barrel to the highest price in two years before a report forecast to show that U.S. crude stockpiles fell for the first time in three weeks. Futures rose as much as 1.5 percent to trade as high as $90.76 in New York. Inventories declined 1.5 million barrels, or 0.4 percent, in the seven days ended Dec. 3 from 359.7 million a week earlier, the Energy Department will report tomorrow, according to a Bloomberg survey.

Read the full article →

Chevron Seeks Gulf Deepwater Oil Drilling Permits, One Of First Since Moratorium Lifted

October 21, 2010

NEW YORK — Chevron Corp. may be one of the first companies to ask permission to drill new wells in the Gulf of Mexico since the moratorium was lifted. The San Ramon, Calif., oil giant said Thursday it plans to file an application for drilling permits in the next several days for various deepwater projects in the Gulf. The government says it hasn’t received any new applications for drilling permits since the Interior Department lifted the ban earlier this month. A Chevron spokesman didn’t specify which projects would be included in the application. But the company said in a separate announcement that it will devote $7.5 billion toward two new fields in about 7,000 feet of water off the Louisiana coast. Projects at those depths were halted for several months following an explosion on a BP operation that killed 11 people and led to the largest offshore oil spill in U.S. history. Chevron’s Jack and St. Malo fields sit about 280 miles south of New Orleans and contain an estimated 500 million barrels of oil and natural gas. The company already has drilled seven exploration and appraisal wells in the area since 2003, and it expects to drill 10 new production wells to tap into those fields. During the next four years, Chevron hopes to install an offshore production facility that can process 170,000 barrels of oil and 42.5 million cubic feet of natural gas per day. Chevron owns 50 percent of the Jack field, 51 percent of the St. Malo field and 51 percent of the production facility. Shares rose 93 cents, or about 1 percent, to $84.95 in morning trading Thursday after rising to a 52-week high of $85 earlier in the session.

Read the full article →

BP’s Future at Risk as Oil Spill, Share Plunge Prompt Takeover Speculation

June 2, 2010

By Brian Swint and Stanley Reed June 2 (Bloomberg) — BP Plc ’s failure to stop an oil leak from spewing millions of gallons of crude into the Gulf of Mexico may leave the biggest oil and gas producer in the U.S. in a fight to stay independent. BP shares have plunged 34 percent since the Deepwater Horizon drilling rig leased by the company exploded on April 20, wiping more than 40 billion pounds ($58 billion) from the company’s value. That may make BP cheap enough to attract acquisition interest, investors said. “The market value of BP has eroded substantially, so it could be a takeover target,” said Dirk Hoozemans , who helps manage about $4.5 billion at Robeco Group in Rotterdam, which sold its BP holding last year. What matters now is how forceful BP’s Chief Executive Officer Tony Hayward is in tackling the disaster and the aftermath, Hoozemans said. With a permanent end to the leak depending on so-called relief wells that are some two months from completion, Hayward faces costs that may reach $22 billion, or more than last year’s profit, according to ING Wholesale Banking. The company also faces a criminal and civil investigation in the U.S. into the disaster. BP spokeswoman Sheila Williams declined to comment for this story. In addition to being the largest oil and gas producer in the U.S., BP is the biggest operator in the Gulf of Mexico, where it holds more than 500 leases and pumps 450,000 barrels of oil a day. The company plans 10 projects in the Gulf during the next five years, more than other regions of the world, according to a BP presentation . ‘Fire Sale’ “Forty percent of BP’s reserves are in the Gulf of Mexico and if there’s a chance that they would be banned from operating in the U.S., then those reserves would be valued at a much lower multiple than their rest-of-the-world reserves,” said Gordon Kwan , the Hong Kong-based head of regional energy research at Mirae Asset Securities Ltd. “They might have to sell at a fire sale to others.” Some analysts estimate the potential for criminal investigation and civil lawsuits facing BP could be as high as $40 billion, which would justify the roughly $50 billion loss in market value, Kwan said. President Obama The U.S. Justice Department is investigating whether any criminal or civil laws were violated in the spill, Attorney General Eric Holder said yesterday. Holder announced the investigation at a news conference in New Orleans, the same day President Barack Obama called the spill “the greatest environmental disaster of its kind in our history.” Obama last week extended a moratorium on deep water drilling permits by six months. He has dropped plans to open waters off the coast of Virginia to drilling, canceled a lease sale in the Gulf and suspended the permit process for Royal Dutch Shell Plc’s planned wells off Arctic Alaska. He said new safety rules will be imposed on drilling. BP has spent $990 million on trying to stop the gusher on the seabed about a mile below the surface and on cleaning up oil from the Gulf. Payments to landowners, hoteliers and fisherman claiming losses from the spill will cause the bill to rise further. ‘The Tab Is Rising’ “The tab is rising every day,” said Fadel Gheit , an analyst at Oppenheimer & Co. in New York. “BP could be facing a huge liability in compensation, damages and other charges.” The cost for the Exxon Valdez tanker disaster in 1989, previously the worst U.S. oil spill, resulting from clean-up costs, fines and settlements has reached at least $4.3 billion so far. BP spokesman Scott Dean said in an e-mail May 19 that the London-based energy company is self-insured against losses and damage claims resulting from the spill. In a worst-case scenario, where hurricanes, technological difficulties, or unforeseen problems thwart BP’s attempts to contain the oil and seal the well, the leak could spout almost 4 million barrels of crude into the Gulf of Mexico by Christmas, petroleum geologists and industry analysts said. Decades of Damage? The oil could suffocate fish and other marine life, damage shorelines along the Gulf Coast, sweeping around to Florida’s Atlantic Coast, and harm the economies that are dependent upon fishing and marine life, according to marine scientists. Toxic crude from the spill could remain trapped in layers of ocean water for decades, scientists say. BP pumped 3.95 million barrels of oil and gas a day last year, making it the world’s largest producer outside government- owned oil companies. Exxon Mobil , its closest rival, pumped 3.93 million barrels a day. BP’s market value, which surpassed Shell at the start of the year, has fallen behind Petroleos Brasileiro SA, Chevron Corp., and Russia’s OAO Gazprom. Paris-based Total SA pumped 2.28 million barrels last year and is priced about $9 billion less than BP on the stock market. “We’re getting into share price territory where analysts speculate about takeover possibilities, because the loss of market value is much greater than the estimated ‘worst case’ costs,” said Ivor Pether , who helps manage $9.2 billion at Royal London Asset Management, including BP shares. “But there aren’t any buyers at this point because the near-term uncertainty is so high.” Debt Ratio Hayward reduced BP’s net debt ratio to 19 percent in the first quarter from 23 percent a year earlier, giving him greater ability to meet cleanup costs and related liabilities. The company has an AA credit rating from Standard & Poor’s and made a record $6 billion profit in the first quarter on $73 billion of revenue. “The liability could be tens of billions of dollars, but I do think BP has the balance sheet capacity to be able to handle a hit like that,” said Jason Gammel , an analyst at Macquarie Securities USA Inc. in New York. “It’s too early to say it’s a takeover candidate because no one wants to own an unquantifiable liability.” BP is now trying to contain the spill by fitting a pipe over the leak to bring the oil to a drillship on the surface. The operation may temporarily increase the flow of oil into the Gulf before a cap can seal the pipe, BP said yesterday. Hayward has promised to clean up “every drop” of oil in the Gulf and on the shoreline from the well that has gushed up to 19,000 barrels of oil a day, according to a government estimate. BP is drilling two relief wells to intercept the damaged well and permanently plug it, a process that won’t be completed until August. To contact the reporters on this story: Brian Swint in London at bswint@bloomberg.net ; Stanley Reed in London at Sreed13@bloomberg.net .

Read the full article →

Oil Spill Worse Than Exxon Valdez: Oceanographer

May 1, 2010

The Gulf Coast spill will have eclipsed the Exxon Valdez in terms of total gallons of oil before the weekend is over — making it the largest oil spill in U.S. history — according to calculations made by oceanographer Ian MacDonald after studying aerial Coast Guard photos taken earlier in the week. MacDonald, a professor at Florida State University who counts “oil and gas development” among his areas of expertise, stopped short of comparing the Deepwater Horizon spill to that of the Alaskan oil tanker, but said Saturday , “The spill is growing. I’m comfortable saying that the size and extent of this slick is 10 million gallons.” Given that just over a million barrels are leaking into the Gulf per day, according to MacDonald’s calculations, the spill will shortly top the Exxon Valdez’s estimated 11-million-barrel spill. It is almost certain to cost more than the Exxon spill , which cost $3.5 billion for cleanup and another $5 billion worth of lawsuits and other settlements. The environmental whistleblowers at SkyTruth, which debunked earlier lowball estimates from the government and BP, said the spill will top the Exxon spill by the end of the day Saturday. Federal point man and Coast Guard Admiral Thad Allen didn’t dispute the calculations of MacDonald of SkyTruth, but said “any exact estimate is probably impossible at this point.”

Read the full article →

BP to Raise Annual Profit $3 Billion by Boosting Production, Cutting Costs

March 2, 2010

By Brian Swint March 2 (Bloomberg) — BP Plc , vying with Royal Dutch Shell Plc as Europe’s largest oil company, plans to increase annual pre-tax profitability by $3 billion over the next two to three years by bolstering production and cutting costs. BP will increase average annual oil and gas output by 1 to 2 percent through 2015, the company said in a annual strategy update today in London. Most of the increased profitability will come from making the refining and marketing business more efficient. The company will centralize exploration and production project management to save money, it said. “The challenge and the opportunity for us is that while our portfolio ranks amongst the best in the industry, our financial performance has yet to fully reflect this,” Chief Executive Officer Tony Hayward said in a statement. “There is now a real opportunity to make our portfolio work harder for us, and we intend to do just that.” BP missed analysts’ earnings estimates in the fourth- quarter as weaker refining margins weighed on profits. BP said it can save an additional $2 billion in its refining and marketing business in the next few years after exceeding cost- cutting targets in 2009. Oil production in 2010 will be “slightly lower” than last year’s output of 4 million barrels a day, Hayward said Feb. 2. BP’s output portfolio is shifting toward natural gas. The company will start 42 new major projects by 2015, which are expected to contribute about 1 million barrels of oil equivalent a day to total production, the company said today. To contact the reporter on this story: Brian Swint in London at bswint@bloomberg.net .

Read the full article →

Saudi Oil Minister: Oil Prices ‘Perfect’

December 5, 2009

CAIRO — Saudi Arabia’s oil minister said current global oil prices are “perfect,” as several key OPEC members indicated the group was unlikely to change output levels when it meets later this month. The Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries, which supplies roughly 35 percent of the world’s crude, has held its quotas unchanged since last year’s record 4.2 million barrels per day in cuts. “The price is perfect,” Saudi oil minister Ali Naimi, whose country is OPEC’s most influential member, told reporters. “The market is stable right now, volatility is at a minimum.” Since December, OPEC has focused on boosting compliance with output quotas of its 12 member states. The group’s approach has helped oil prices rebound to almost $80 per barrel recently, after they collapsed last year as the world’s worst recession in decades sapped demand for crude. The benchmark crude oil contract for January delivery settled at $75.47 a barrel on Friday on the New York Mercantile Exchange, hitting a seven-week low on high global inventories and the strong dollar. Ministers from several key Arab OPEC nations, however, indicated that they were satisfied with the current situation in the market and said it was unlikely the group would change quota levels at its Dec. 22 meeting in Luanda, Angola. “No, no, no, I don’t expect anything,” said Shukri Ghanem, the head of Libya’s National Oil Corp. who serves as the North African nation’s de facto oil minister. “I think because … of the market situation, because of the fluctuation of the market, we don’t expect any change in the quota.” Kuwaiti oil minister Sheik Ahmed Al Abdullah Al Sabah said the group would likely hold its output targets “as is.” Algerian Oil Minister Chakib Khelil said that it would be some time before OPEC likely considered raising its production targets, signaling a lingering unease with global inventory levels. All four officials spoke on the sidelines of the annual meeting of the Organization of Arab Petroleum Exporting Countries. OPEC has said it wants to see crude in the $70-$80 per barrel range, a level which Saudi Arabia’s king had first indicated was high enough to encourage producers to continue their work while not shocking the world’s economy. The producer bloc’s efforts to bring global crude stocks down have been somewhat undermined, however, by weaker compliance by some of its members – a slippage that has become more pronounced as oil prices climbed. The overwhelming majority of OPEC nations rely on oil revenues for as much as 90 percent of their foreign revenues, and higher prices have encouraged the more cash-strapped member-states to boost their output. Libya’s Ghanem said that he believed the group will “have to call for more compliance by OPEC members because there is some … excess production.” An OPEC report last month said the group, excluding Iraq which is not bound by quotas, produced roughly 26.5 million barrels per day in October. That is about 1.5 million barrels per day above their production target. Naimi voiced satisfaction with the current situation, however, saying that “inventories are coming down.”

Read the full article →

Japanese Stocks Fall After Oil, Metal Prices Slump; Nippon Mining Declines

November 12, 2009

By Akiko Ikeda and Kotaro Tsunetomi Nov. 13 (Bloomberg) — Japanese stocks fell after crude-oil and metal prices slumped. Nippon Mining Holdings Inc. , Japan’s biggest copper producer and an oil refiner, sank 1.6 percent, after oil retreated 3 percent yesterday in New York to a four-week low and metals slid in London. AOC Holdings Inc. , an oil and gas explorer, dropped 1.6 percent. Nippon Sheet Glass Co., a glassmaker, slid 0.7 percent after the company reported a first- half loss. “Energy-related stocks should sag,” said Juichi Wako , a senior strategist at Tokyo-based Nomura Holdings Inc. The Nikkei 225 Stock Average fell 0.2 percent to 9,788.77 as of 9:12 a.m. in Tokyo. The broader Topix index dropped 0.2 percent to 865.73. Yesterday in New York, the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index slid 1 percent from a 13-month high on the previous day, dragged down by energy producers on bigger-than-estimated increase in oil stockpiles. Crude oil for December delivery fell 3 percent to $76.94 a barrel on the New York Mercantile Exchange yesterday, the lowest settlement since Oct. 14. The Energy Department report showed supplies of crude oil rose 1.76 million barrels to 337.7 million last week. Analysts surveyed by Bloomberg News forecast a 1 million-barrel gain. The London Metals Index , a measure of six metals including copper and zinc, dropped 0.8 percent yesterday, its steepest slump this week. To contact the reporters for this story: Akiko Ikeda in Tokyo at iakiko@bloomberg.net ; Kotaro Tsunetomi at ktsunetomi@bloomberg.net .

Read the full article →

U.S. Imports Of Saudi Oil Fall By 50 Percent

November 4, 2009

It’s become conventional wisdom that the U.S. needs to reduce how much oil it imports from Saudi Arabia, in order to both improve our energy independence and to stop sending billions of dollars to the country that spawned Osama Bin Laden and almost all of the 9/11 hijackers. That demand became a bipartisan campaign refrain in both the 2004 and 2008 presidential elections and has been repeated by countless columnists such as the New York Times’s Thomas Friedman . So, the recent announcement that oil imports from Saudi Arabia had dropped dramatically to its lowest point in 22 years and that the country had fallen from second to fifth (behind Nigeria) on the list of the biggest foreign suppliers of oil to the U.S. in August would seem to represent a fulfillment of that wish. Not if you talk to oil industry analysts who emphasize that the reduction is due to the whims of Saudi Arabia and not to any change in policy or procedure by U.S. oil companies. “Saudi Arabia runs the cartel (OPEC) so when they want to keep prices up, they price it so that no one wants it,” energy analyst Philip Verleger tells Huffington Post. Indeed, though Saudi Arabia’s oil exports to the U.S. fell in half, from 1.533 million barrels per day in August 2008 to 745,000 barrels per day in August 2009, overall this year, the country was still third among the biggest oil exporters.

Read the full article →

OPEC Spare Production Capacity May Stymie Oil’s Rally: Chart of the Day

August 13, 2009

By Mark Shenk Aug. 13 (Bloomberg) — Crude oil prices, which have surged 60 percent this year, may not rise above $80 a barrel because spare production capacity among OPEC members has swollen. The CHART OF THE DAY shows the relationship between crude oil futures traded in New York and excess output capacity of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries this decade. Prices climbed to a record $147.27 on July 11, 2008, when OPEC members had the ability to bring fewer than 3 million barrels of additional production online. In March the 12-member group could have produced 6.84 million barrels a day above its actual production, if needed, the most since 2001, according to a monthly Bloomberg News survey of oil companies, producers and analysts. That margin was 6.11 million barrels last month. “The numbers have gotten much larger over the past year,” said Rick Mueller , a director of oil markets at Energy Security Analysis Inc. in Wakefield, Massachusetts. “The Saudis alone probably have close to 3 million barrels excess capacity. The excess shows how effective OPEC’s been in managing the market.” OPEC agreed at three meetings last year that the members with quotas would cut output by a combined 4.2 million barrels a day to 24.845 million in a bid to bolster prices. The group is scheduled to discuss production levels in Vienna on Sept. 9 after leaving output unchanged at two meetings this year. “The Saudis are happy with oil in the $70-to-$80 range,” Mueller said. “It’s low enough to stop development of some oil sands and alternative energy sources while not hurting the economy. If prices rose above $75 they would open the spigot.” Saudi Arabian Oil Minister Ali al-Naimi said on May 23 in Rome that crude oil at $75 a barrel would be healthy for the global economy. The aim will be “keeping it between $70 and $80,” he said. The Kingdom is the world’s biggest oil exporter. To contact the reporter on this story: Mark Shenk in New York at mshenk1@bloomberg.net

Read the full article →