montreal

Huffington Post…

ARMONK, N.Y. (AP) — IBM’s Watson computer is going into finance. Citigroup and IBM said Monday they will look into how the famous computer system’s technology can improve banking for customers. Citi said it’s hoping to improve the accuracy and speed of making decisions, assessing risk and finding lending opportunities. In a blog entry, an IBM general manager suggested Watson could eventually help customers decide how much money they needed to retire or whether they should reshuffle their investments. Watson is best known for defeating the best “Jeopardy!” players on TV. It’s also being used by health insurer WellPoint Inc. to help diagnose medical problems. In a previous collaboration, IBM and Citi announced in 1954 that IBM’s “electronic brain” reduced the time for a cost-benefit analysis from 1,000 man-hours to 9.5 minutes.

The rest is here:
Watson, Computer Jeopardy Champ, Gets A Job On Wall Street

Find our Weekly Commercial Real Estate, Private Equity and Fund Newsletters at www.WeeklyBrief.net

Goldman Sachs To Sell Off Canadian Movie Distributor

by The Huffington Post Canada on January 3, 2012

Huffington Post…

Goldman Sachs plans to put its majority control of Canadian movie distributor Alliance Atlantis on the auction block, reports suggested Tuesday. London’s Financial Times newspaper reports the New York investment bank is seeking to sell its 66 per cent ownership interest in Alliance. The remainder is owned by Investissement Québec, the investment arm of the Quebec government. The Bank of Montreal has been retained to advise Goldman on the sale, the report said. Officials at Goldman Sachs and Alliance Atlantis declined to comment. Goldman is not typically a name associated with blockbuster movies, but the Wall Street titan got its controlling interest in Alliance as part of a complicated deal in 2007 with Canwest Global Communications, whereby Goldman put up money to fund an aggressive consolidation of broadcast assets by the founding Asper family. Crushed in part by the debt accrued in that campaign, Canwest has since ceased to exist, with the chain’s newspaper holdings becoming the Postmedia chain, and Alliance’s broadcast channels sold to Shaw communications last year. But Goldman emerged with arguably the jewel of the lot in Alliance, because it retained the filmmaking division and the syndication rights to several popular television shows. Alliance Films made last year’s Best Picture Oscar winner, The King’s Speech, and bankrolled the current movie Shame, starring Michael Fassbender and Carey Mulligan. Alliance Films owns a catalog of more than 11,000 movies. As part of their original Alliance stake, Goldman maintains a 50 per cent interest in the rights to the CSI franchise, which has so far spawned three network television series and countless marketing and promotional tie-ins. The FT report says the CSI rights will not be included in any Alliance sale, so Goldman will retain its stake in what’s proven to be a very lucrative cash-cow for more than a decade.

Read the original here:
Goldman Sachs To Sell Off Canadian Movie Distributor

Find our Weekly Commercial Real Estate, Private Equity and Fund Newsletters at www.WeeklyBrief.net

Matthew Bishop: The Year of Controversial Giving

January 2, 2012

What does 2012 have in store for giving, especially the impact-driven approach to it we call “philanthrocapitalism”? Having peered into our philanthrocrystal ball, we see giving becoming more dangerous, more controversial, and more political, among other things, as philanthrocapitalists find themselves at the centre of some of the year’s biggest news stories. Here are our 10 predictions for the coming year: 1. Greater scrutiny of the 1 percent. The role of the rich in setting the political agenda is going to be one of the big stories in the run-up to the U.S. presidential election in November. Philanthrocapitalists hungry for impact are increasingly looking to get leverage by influencing government policy, and this election will set the policy agenda for the next four years at a time when America (and, along with it, the world) faces some tough choices. We have been here before, of course, with George Soros’ support for the “Move On” campaign in 2004, which was ultimately unsuccessful in unseating the incumbent president, George W. Bush. The influence of the Koch brothers on the right is already on the media’s radar, but there are plenty more to be discovered. Expect donors of the left and the right to pitch in to this contest using political donations and philanthropic giving to support policy thinking on issues like budget priorities and health care and school reform. Is this philanthropy or plutocracy? We will all be talking about that this year. 2. Nation building is back. Politics will also be a big theme of philanthropy around the world, which may bring with it genuine danger for those involved. From the nations involved in the Arab Spring to Vladimir Putin’s (for now) Russia, and maybe even North Korea, philanthropists are going to be getting involved far more than in recent years in supporting civic movements and even political movements in countries where there is a real opportunity to change the political balance, hopefully in a more democratic and just direction. As the year-end crackdown on various American-backed nonprofits by Egypt’s military government should remind everyone involved, those threatened by this philanthropy are unilkely to take foreign interference in their countries lying down. 3. Crunch time for Muslim philanthropy. On a related point, 2012 is going to be a year of decision for Muslim philanthropists. There is a huge opportunity for them to strengthen civil society in the Arab Spring countries and work with the emerging entrepreneurs and social entrepreneurs there. Pakistan and Afghanistan are both in need of high-impact philanthropy. Yet with the honorable exception of the Aga Khan Foundation, too much of the giving from Muslim donors, including by some of the multi-billion-dollar foundations set up by the rulers of Gulf countries and their leading businesses, is still focused on traditional welfare and charity rather than social change. Yet change seems likely to happen with or without them, and if they do not help it along, it may well be at the expense of the Muslim wealthy. Perhaps this is an area where Turkey’s emerging philanthrocapitalists will show a lead to the rest of the Muslim world. 4. Occupy philanthropy. One of the big questions of the year will be whether the global Occupy movement will evolve from a necessary voice of protest into an effective force for change. There is an opportunity, and we believe an obligation, for philanthrocapitalists to help reform capitalism, so that it genuinely works in the interest of the population as a whole, not just a small subset of it. Andrew Carnegie understood the vulnerability of capitalism to the perception of it being inherently unfair; it is time today’s successful capitalists did so, too. The gradually increasing pack of CEOs who get it, such as Indra Nooyi of PepsiCo, Paul Polman of Unilever, and Sir Richard Branson of Virgin, have a huge opportunity to set the agenda for their peers, as long as they back up their words with serious action. 5. Steve Jobs, philanthropist. After spending his life being fairly dismissive of philanthropy, the late co-founder of Apple is likely to be one of the most prominent additions to the mega-giving scene in 2012. His widow, Laurene Powell Jobs, has long been involved in giving, having founded an organisation to get students from poor backgrounds into college, participating in the Clinton Global Initiative and Global Philanthropy Forum, and visiting Africa on a trip for philanthropists led by Ben Affleck. Now that she controls her late husband’s fortune, expect her to start putting it to good use. We can also look forward to some weird and wacky philanthropy from new donors from the social media generation. The Facebook IPO is going to make a lot of people very rich and, since its founder Mark Zuckerberg has already signed up to the Giving Pledge, we are hopeful that the new cohort of wealthy will turn to philanthropy as a priority. The most entertaining philanthropist of 2011 was Silicon Valley venture capitalist Peter Thiel, who famously/notoriously offered $100,000 grants to get people to drop out of college and start a business, as well as supporting efforts to create new floating countries in international waters (“sea steading”) and launching a science fund closed to university academics, a large proportion of the people we normally think of as scientists. Plenty of people think Thiel is nuts, which is great. Too much philanthropy today talks about risk-taking without being willing to court controversy. Expect the donors of the social network generation to have no such fears. 6. Celanthropy’s new stars. Ben Affleck will become more prominent on the Hollywood philanthropy scene, though probably still lagging behind the likes of Brangelina, George Clooney, and Matt Damon. The celanthropist to watch, though, will be Lady Gaga, who we expect to take a big step forward in her giving, probably with a cause dear to the hearts of her “Little Monsters” (as she calls her young fans). Another celanthropist worth watching will be Ashton Kutcher, to see if he can recover as a force for good following a messy divorce and some unfortunate tweeting in 2011. Despite his and other bad celebrity experiences, the use of Twitter and other social media in philanthropy will continue to increase — which should mean even more celebrity mishaps this year. Some giving dynasties will also move more clearly into the limelight. Will Chelsea Clinton, as well as championing social causes in her new TV job, take a bigger role at the Clinton Global Initiative? Expect greater interest to be taken in Barbara Bush, daughter of George W., and her health care nonprofit, Global Health Corps. And now that he is focusing on philanthropy, expect some bold initiatives from Howard Bufffett, grandson of Warren Buffett. Also watch out for the House of Windsor, as Britain’s Brangelina, Wills ‘n’ Kate, make a serious effort to build a celanthropic brand, hopefully learning from the ability of Princess Diana to draw attention to an issue and the underrated skills of Prince Charles as a social entrepreneur. 7. Deep impact. This will be a big year for “impact investing,” which explicitly seeks both financial and social/environmental returns. So far, there has been much more talk than action, but the time has come for the money to back the ideas. The Omidyar Network has already taken a lead, but some other big philanthrocapitalists will join it this year. Enter the Gates Foundation? 8. The great extinction. Alas, it is going to be a tough year for many nonprofits. We are braced for more scandals about inspiring narratives unsupported by facts, along the lines of the 2011 Greg Mortenson exposé. The pain of government spending cuts will be felt widely, both directly, as many nonprofits rely on money from government, and indirectly, as cuts to government services will lead to greater demand pressure on non-government alternatives. We think that many nonprofits will be faced with serious shrinkage and, in many cases, extinction. Our hope is that smart donors will grasp the nettle and try to manage this culling process, encouraging mergers wherever possible, so that the best of the nonprofit sector is preserved or, better still, made stronger. 9. Philanthrocapitalism the Chinese way. There was some schadenfreude when the Gates-Buffett visit to China in 2010 failed to drum up new signatories to their Giving Pledge, although that was not the immediate goal of their mission. We expect philanthrocapitalism to become an increasingly important force in China in 2012, though it will have a distinctive local flavor. Instead of traditional, American-style, foundation-oriented philanthropy, we expect a wave of stories about corporates playing a key role in solving social and environmental problems through a version of “social investment.” China is now hitting a difficult stage of economic development when it needs to manage its use of natural resources, stop competing on low labor costs alone, start tackling potential drags on its competitiveness, such as its rapidly aging population, and deal with rising expectations among the populations. All of this requires a wave of innovation, which China’s philanthrocapitalists are well placed to lead. 10. Some good news. We are hopeful for some big breakthroughs that will prove that philanthrocapitalism works. Will some of the few remaining countries still hit by polio announce that they are free of the disease? Will the death toll from malaria plunge even further and faster? We think so, and that as it does, it will validate the “posse” approach to solving the world’s problems at the heart of philanthrocapitalism. Expect more new posse partnerships to be announced, similar to the Malaria No More campaign led by Ray Chambers, which has galvanized a powerful coalition of the willing. This is a time of growing scepticism about the effectiveness of government, international aid, and even of giving. Yet clear evidence of results may start to change the mood and persuade a growing number of people that philanthrocapitalism is worth the risk. Matthew Bishop and Michael Green are co-authors of Philanthrocapitalism: How Giving Can Save the World . Bishop is New York Bureau Chief of The Economist ; Green is an independent writer and consultant.

Read the full article →

4.0 Quake Rattles Northeast Ohio

January 1, 2012

McDONALD, Ohio (AP) — Officials said Saturday they believe the latest earthquake activity in northeast Ohio is related to the injection of wastewater into the ground near a fault line, creating enough pressure to cause seismic activity. The brine wastewater comes from drilling operations that use the so-called fracking process to extract gas from underground shale. But Ohio Department of Natural Resources Director Jim Zehringer said during a news teleconference that fracking is not causing the quakes. “The seismic events are not a direct result of fracking,” he said. Environmentalists and property owners who live near gas drilling wells have questioned the safety of fracking to the environment and public health. Federal regulators have declared the technology safe, however. Zehringer said four injection wells within a 5-mile (8-kilometer) radius of an already shuttered well in Youngstown will remain inactive while further scientific research is conducted. A 4.0 magnitude quake Saturday afternoon in McDonald, outside of Youngstown, was the 11th in a series of minor earthquakes in area, many of which have struck near the Youngstown injection well. The quake caused no serious injuries or property damage, Zehringer said. Thousands of gallons of brine were injected into the well daily until its owner, Northstar Disposal Services LLC, agreed Friday to stop injecting brine into the earth as a precaution while authorities assess any potential links to the quakes. Michael Hansen of the Ohio Seismic Network said Saturday that more quakes are possible, most likely small ones, until the pressure at the fault line has been completely relieved. The temblor Saturday appeared to be stronger than others, which generally had a magnitude of 2.7 or lower. Some residents reported feeling trembling farther south into Columbiana County and east into western Pennsylvania. Area residents said a loud boom accompanied the shaking. It sent some stunned residents running for cover as bookshelves shook and pictures and lamps fell from tables. A few miles from the epicenter, Charles Kihm said he was preparing food in his kitchen when he heard a noise and thought a vehicle had hit his Austintown home. “It really shook, and it rumbled, like there was a sound,” said Kihm, 82. “It was loud. It didn’t last long. But it really scared me.” There are 177 similar injection wells around the state, and the Youngstown-area well has been the only site with seismic activity, the department said. Zehringer said that to shut down all of the wells because of seismic activity near one would be an overreaction.

Read the full article →

WATCH: Occupy Wall Street Plans To ‘Occupy Christmas’

December 22, 2011

NEW YORK — Faith leaders from across the country met at the Judson Memorial Church in downtown New York City on Tuesday to discuss their role in the future of the Occupy Wall Street movement. The meeting came just days after the three-month anniversary of Occupy Wall Street in New York; demonstrators trespassed on a vacant lot owned by the Trinity Church to hold a rally and protest, ending in dozens of arrests . Father Paul Mayer, who worked with Martin Luther King Jr. during the civil rights era, was one of those arrested on Saturday. “These young people are raising the issue of social justice and economic justice and equity and a fair distribution of the riches of this Earth between all peoples in a way that our churches should be raising it,” he said at the meeting. Participants of Occupy Faith NYC, a faith-based protest group, handed out pamphlets at the meeting to explain the “Occupy Christmas” event scheduled for Christmas Eve in Zuccotti Park. Protesters plan to stage a 24-hour vigil with music and food beginning at midnight. The pamphlets entitled, “Why Occupy Christmas?,” explained that a bible passage commonly read in church during the Christmas season inspired the idea for the event. “It says in your narrative for Christmas day, that the people who walk in darkness have seen a great light. And this whole movement has come together because of that darkness,” explained Matt Carson, 26, an Occupier and seminary student who is helping to organize the event. At the Church of St. Paul & St. Andrew on Manhattan’s Upper West Side, Occupiers have been welcomed with open arms since the Nov. 15 raid of Zuccotti Park. Associate pastor Shiboan Sargent recently recalled those first hectic days. “They felt really violated, all their stuff got taken and as a result when they came here they needed to have a moment of peace and healing,” she said. The church has been doing just that, providing the protesters with a place to sleep in its sanctuary and the usage of its kitchen on most nights. For the last month, it has hosted 60-90 protesters on average each night. The protesters are required to sign in for the night with a volunteer receptionist who sits at the main entrance. A list of rules on a paper handout explains that drugs and alcohol are strictly forbidden and that the church will not allow protesters to arrive past midnight. They can arrive as early as 8:30 p.m. and are asked to leave by 8:30 a.m. “The whole goal is that we’re helping them to change the world and they’re not here to just hang out here and sleep all day,” Sargent said. On a recent night, some protesters borrowed cushions from the church pews to use as makeshift mattresses, while others put sleeping bags on the floor of the sanctuary. Eric Smith, who The Huffington Post profiled in November in its “Faces of Zuccotti Park” video series, was getting ready to go to bed for the night on the sanctuary floor. “I’ve never been in a house or an apartment that had such beautiful high ceilings,” he said, looking skyward toward the church’s antique dome interior. Teddy Mapes, 46, was working in construction as a pipefitter before he was lured into the movement by what he described as Zuccotti Park’s “Woodstock vibe.” He had just finished preparing a dinner of franks, beans, and white bread for his fellow Occupiers. Mapes said he felt like the church gave the protesters a “big bear hug” after their eviction from Zuccotti. “If it wasn’t for St. Paul and St. Andrew, there would have been a lot of people that were lost,” he said. Back at the meeting of national faith leaders, Reverend James Lawson, who also worked closely with Martin Luther King Jr. during the civil rights movement, was giving Occupy Wall Street his stamp of approval. “You first start out be saying no, resisting the oppression and the pain and suffering that’s going on and staying together, and then you begin to move further down the line,” he said. The vacant lot next to Duarte Square was eerily silent after Saturday’s protest. Decorations left over from the rally hung from a tree and a police car was stationed next to the chain link fence — which had been quickly repaired after protesters scaled it or crawled under it to get to lot. Graffiti scribbled on a wooden park bench sent a message about the future intentions of the Occupiers. “It’s far from over,” it read.

Read the full article →

Tom Coburn Singles Out D.C. Pancake Restaurant As Government Waste

December 21, 2011

WASHINGTON — Sen. Tom Coburn (R-Okla.) released his annual “Wastebook” this week and singled out a District of Columbia IHOP restaurant as an example of government waste. According to The Hill : Among the projects listed as wasteful in Coburn’s book are $113,227 for a video game preservation center in New York, $10 million for a remake of “Sesame Street” for Pakistan, $765,828 to subsidize a “pancakes for yuppies” program in Washington, D.C., and $764,825 to study how college students use mobile devices for social networking. Coburn’s report cites a Washington Examiner opinion column by David Freddoso on pancake situation involving Columbia Heights’ IHOP restaurant, which opened to great fanfare in the closing weeks of then-Mayor Adrian Fenty’s administration. Coburn’s report contends: The new IHOP is not located in an — underserved community but a popular Washington D.C. neighborhood. The neighborhood is Columbia Heights, which has become a local shopping hot spot for some and — one of Washington’s more desirable neighborhoods. Other businesses in the area include Target, Bed Bath and Beyond, Best Buy, and Starbucks. IHOP set up shop in a massive Columbia Heights shopping center, part of a major mixed-use redevelopment of a once-vibrant commercial corridor that had been fairly barren even years after a Green Line Metrorail station opened. Last year, Lydia DePillis in Washington City Paper profiled the newly opened IHOP restaurant . The D.C. government set aside $46.9 million in tax increment financing for the massive DCUSA shopping complex and the developer reserved 15,000 square feet for small, local and minority-owned businesses in the building. The IHOP franchise owner is Tyoka Jackson, whose family-owned investment company signed a three-restaurant deal with IHOP. According to DePillis: In some ways, the Jacksons’ IHOP enterprise is a small business. They’ve put in the $1 million for construction, made hiring decisions, and will be the ones to lose their shirts if the place fails. But the Jacksons have a few advantages an independent business could never claim. They get expert business consulting courtesy of the mothership, pooled television advertising, and supplies from a nationwide sourcing cooperative shared with corporate sister Applebees. After the Wastebook report was released, City Paper followed up with Coburn’s office. The senator’s spokesman wrote in reply : “If the D.C. government wants to invest more in IHOP they are certainly welcome to do so. We don’t believe this should be a priority of the federal government when we’re running a $15 trillion debt and our entitlement programs are on the brink of insolvency.”

Read the full article →

EPA’s Air Toxics Standards A ‘Great Victory,’ Say Public Health And Environmental Advocates

December 21, 2011

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency unveiled historic new rules on Wednesday that would limit the mercury, arsenic and other toxic pollutants in America’s air, water and food. Standing with pediatricians, public health experts and industry representatives at Children’s National Medical Center in Washington, D.C., EPA administrator Lisa Jackson called the first-ever Mercury and Air Toxics Standards , or MATS, for power plant emissions a “great victory for public health, especially the health of our children.” In addition to preventing up to 11,000 premature deaths and 130,000 cases of aggravated asthma among children annually by 2016, as well as other health benefits estimated by the EPA, Jackson noted the rule would provide a net increase in American jobs with no risk to the country’s power supply. “The lights will stay on and we will have cleaner air,” said Jackson. For the more than 20 years since the EPA was first tasked with considering toxic air pollutants under the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments, a battle has waged between public health advocates, who have touted the benefits of stricter standards, and industry lobbyists, who have argued that such standards would threaten jobs and raise energy prices for Americans. Meanwhile, the EPA has issued over 110 standards to cut toxic air pollution from other sources, including oil refineries and steel plants. Power plants remained a “notable and notorious exception,” said John Walke, director of the clean air program for the Natural Resources Defense Council. “The electric power sector is far and away the largest emitter of toxic air pollution in America,” he told The Huffington Post. “Yet it’s escaped responsibility to clean up while far smaller sources like dry cleaners in your neighborhood have already cleaned up their toxic air emissions.” The EPA’s own analysis estimates that the newly finalized rules would put the industry out about $10 billion a year and save the country $90 billion in health care costs. In other words, for every dollar spent under the rule, said Jackson, there would be “up to $9 of health benefits.” The EPA’s estimates are actually a small fraction of what could be gained under the new rules, according to experts. The agency could only account for reductions in asthma attacks, heart attacks and strokes, among other health problems associated with soot (or particulates). The prevention of cognitive disorders, kidney disease and cancers caused by mercury, dioxins, arsenic, lead and other toxins was omitted due to limited data. Part of the problem, according to Jim Pew, a staff attorney for the nonprofit Earthjustice, is that industry has “done their best to stall or block” the kind of research needed to quantify these benefits. “Both mercury and particulates can be controlled if power plants put proper scrubbers on,” said Dr. Philip Landrigan, chairman of the department of preventative medicine at the Mount Sinai School of Medicine in New York City. “The scrubbers cost money. But the loss of IQ caused by mercury and respiratory disorders caused by fine particles is also very expensive.” In fact, Dr. Landrigan’s own research has put a price tag on at least one of the EPA’s missing pieces: the loss of IQ due to mercury. Between 300,000 and 600,000 of the 4 million babies born in the U.S. each year are exposed to significant amounts of the neurotoxin while in the womb, he said. “These babies all suffer losses of IQ,” Dr. Landrigan told HuffPost. “Each IQ point is worth money.” Dr. Landrigan and his team calculated that every IQ point is worth $10,000 in lifetime earnings. Overall, they attributed $1.3 billion every year to mercury emissions from power plants, based just on IQ losses. “That’s why any action that the EPA takes to reduce mercury emissions is so incredibly important,” he said. Up to three-quarters of the mercury that goes into the atmosphere comes out of smokestacks of coal-fired power plants. Because the particles are heavier than air, the mercury eventually falls back down and is deposited in rivers, lakes and oceans, where it is converted into a more toxic form called methylmercury. This then builds up in the food chain, meaning that fish at the top, such as blue fin tuna and shark, carry the highest levels of the toxin. “The developing brain of a fetus is exquisitely sensitive to methylmercury,” said Dr. Landrigan. “At the end of the day, you have a one-time expense for the power industry or a continuing erosion of the brain power of a whole generation of American children.” Still, many representatives of the power industry maintain that even this one-time cost is too much, too soon. Power companies will have three years to install equipment or shut down old plants, with the possibility of an extension into a fourth year. “It takes time to get environmental permits and approval from regulators. They can’t comply with regulations within three years,” said Melissa McHenry, spokesperson for American Electric Power, one of the nation’s largest generators of electricity. “We don’t have an issue with limits they want to get to, just the time frame.” “There’s no way that this rule can be implemented the way it came out,” added Jeff Holmstead, a former EPA official now at law firm Bracewell and Giuliani, which represents energy industry clients. “Everyone is going to be rushing at the same time to get control tech in, and they can’t do that while operating. There will be localized reliability issues.” Industry will have 60 days once the rule is published to file a legal challenge. Susan Tierney, managing principal at the Analysis Group in Boston and former assistant secretary for policy at the U.S. Department of Energy, refuted these arguments. About 1,100 coal-fired units are covered by the MATS rule, of which about 40 percent don’t use modern pollution controls. Many of the power plants most affected, she said, were built before these technological advances. She also pointed to the 17 states that already have mercury controls, noting that the plants in those states are already compliant. “The technology is well known,” Tierney told HuffPost. Constellation Energy, for example, invested $885 million to add environmental controls and a new scrubber to its Brandon Shores facility in Maryland. This resulted in a 90 percent cut to mercury emissions, 1,385 jobs during peak construction, and many more jobs manufacturing the clean air technologies. “Power plants that are old and dirty should’ve ended their useful life already and gone out of commission,” added Michael Livermore, executive director of the Institute for Policy Integrity and adjunct professor at New York University. “We live in the 21st century. We shouldn’t be using plants from 1950s.” “The benefits of this rule outweigh the costs by a huge factor,” he said. “In fact, given the huge ratio of benefits to costs, we could make the rule even more strict and still generate even greater net benefits.”

Read the full article →

The European Banking Authority (EBA) has warned lenders against being so risk-averse as to prompt a credit crunch.

December 11, 2011

FRANKFURT – The European Banking Authority (EBA) has warned lenders against being so risk-averse as to prompt a credit crunch. It also said regulators would not allow a cut in lending as a means to meeting regulatory capital targets. Banks have changed their behavior far more than the public has realized in the wake of the financial crisis, EBA head Andrea Enria told German magazine Der Spiegel in an interview. “At the moment, our concerns have gone to the other extreme: that we could now have the problem banks are too risk-averse, which could ultimately lead to a severe credit crunch,” Enria said in the interview in the magazine’s Monday edition. Lenders around Europe will need to drum up about 115 billion euros ($154 billion) in extra capital by June 30 to meet a regulatory capital target set by the watchdog. Banks can retain earnings, curb dividends and bonuses, sell off chunks of their businesses or reduce risky assets to meet the target, but Enria put them on guard if they were thinking of choking off loans. “If a bank reduces its lending to small and medium-sized enterprises, it won’t be counted (toward meeting the target),” he said. “We will not allow credit supply to be cut.” Banks have until January 20 to present their roadmaps for meeting the regulatory capital target to banking supervisors. Loan portfolios can be sold, even to hedge funds, to help bolster banks’ equity capital cushions, Enria said. The EBA wants banks to reach a core Tier 1 regulatory capital ratio of 9 percent by the mid-2012 deadline, which should help lenders withstand any market deterioration. The watchdog’s stress tests of banks, based on data from the third quarter, revealed six German lenders need 13.1 billion euros of extra capital to meet the deadline, nearly triple the amount estimated previously. Commerzbank (CBKG.DE) needs 5.3 billion euros and Deutsche Bank (DBKGn.DE) 3.2 billion, with four other public-sector or co-operative lenders — NordLB, Helaba, DZ Bank and WestLB — making up the remainder. “These sorts of high figures do not necessarily mean that banks are in bad shape,” Enria said. “The most urgent problem is funding, and in that regard the German banks are doing better than others. However, the storm is also affecting them, and they, too, have to strengthen their capital.” Only a few large banks have been able to fund their businesses since July, and have had to pay very high interest rates to do so, Enria said. “If banks cannot get funds, they stop lending and that damages the economy,” he said. “We are stuck in a vicious circle and we have to try to break out of it.” ($1 = 0.7482 euros) (Reporting by Jonathan Gould; Editing by David Hulmes) Copyright 2011 Thomson Reuters. Click for Restrictions .

Read the full article →

Mitch Joel: Breaking All of Twitter’s Rules

November 29, 2011

Is there a sure-fire way to be successful using Twitter ? Business books, blog posts, magazine articles, Tumblr feeds, newspaper articles, TV news segments and yes, even tweets, have been written about what it takes for both individuals and brands to be successful on Twitter. Allow me to sum up some of the more commonly-held recommendations for Twitter success: Get in early. Evan Williams (co-founder of Twitter) joined in March of 2006. Chris Brogan ( Human Business Works and co-author with Julien Smith of the best-selling business book, Trust Agents ) joined in October of 2006. Personally, I was a little late to the game (joining in February of 2007). I can’t imagine what it would be like to join Twitter today in an attempt to grow an audience. With so many people using the service (and yes, this includes those who are simply stalking celebrities), it is hard to gain traction and maintain it. Follow a lot of people. It makes sense. The more people that you follow, the more likelihood there will be for people to not only follow you back, but to acknowledge you and connect. While it’s not about how many people you connect with (I’d argue that it’s about who you connect with), it’s obvious that this tactic should be applied. Follow back those who follow you. This is a contentious point that depends on who you ask. For many people, this is both a common courtesy and the smart move to make. If you follow back everyone that follows you, you wind up meeting lots of new and interesting people. The major debate around this point is based on the quantity versus quality argument: if you follow back everyone, it makes your Twitter stream somewhat noisy. If you only follow back those who are truly interesting to you, it’s a better way to curate content and dive deeper into some of the meatier conversations. Both sides to this argument have valid stances. Tweet frequently and consistently. Twitter (like much of the new Internet) is a live, real-time environment. If you don’t tweet often, there is a likelihood that you (and your content) will get lost in the river of tweets. If you tweet only once a day, and the majority of people who follow you are not online then, your tweet is rarely seen or acted on. Adding on to the complexity of this is our globally connected world where different time zones and work lifestyles also factor into the equation. Think about this way: if you tweet from New York City, odds are your European audience interaction will be less than if you were based in Paris and tweeting when everyone else was equally active. Remember, real-time web makes the amount of followers not as important as when individuals are actually online, connected, following and reading you. Tweet very original things (not just links). If all that’s being tweeted is links and you’re not spending the time to think of anything original to say, you won’t find much traction either. The brands and individuals who are the most successful on Twitter are those who create content in a very original way. Make it personal and respond back to as many people as possible. If you don’t respond, acknowledge and discuss things with people following you on Twitter, it will be a useless and terrible experience. Those who truly have massive audiences and attention are the ones who respond back to anyone and everyone. The people that you respond back to will then feel special and this make them more likely to retweet your content and ask their followers to follow you too. This is online social networking… not a broadcasting channel. Become a celebrity. Scott Stratten ( @unmarketing ) often tells the story of the hours, weeks and months he spent head-down in Twitter as his platform of choice (and to build an audience). He has been wildly successful at it! (Along with a best-selling book and speaking gigs, he has nearly 110,000 Twitter followers.) As Scott likes to say, he’s kind of a big deal on Twitter. If you play your cards right, focus and follow the steps above, you too can make a name for yourself. For some (and this includes many brands), having the attention of hundreds of thousand of followers is not only a big deal, but it does make them celebrities. You can also do the exact opposite. Avinash Kaushik is not only a personal friend, he’s the Digital Marketing Evangelist at Google and author of two-best selling business books ( Web Analytics – An Hour A Day and Web Analytics 2.0 ). When you compare what Avinash does on Twitter to the commonly-held beliefs above, you may be surprised to learn: He started tweeting on July 30, 2008. He only follows 88 people. He also jokes that if he finds someone else he would like to follow, someone on his list of 88 has to get booted off. 88 is his maximum amount of followers and he says he’s sticking to it. With close to 65,000 followers, it’s also obvious that he refuses to follow back everyone just because they’re following him. He only tweets a couple of times a day. That’s it. He prefers to tweet out things that have caught his attention. This makes the majority of his content link to other places and not his original thinking (you can get that on his blog, Occam’s Razor ). While he does respond to people using the @ sign, it seems to be secondary to his sharing of what’s interesting to him. He is a celebrity and there’s no doubt that Twitter has propelled his status within the digital marketing and web analytics world. This is not about Avinash Kaushik. The point is that everyone has an opinion about why something is successful and why other things fail. Brands (and individuals) are constantly looking for both best practices and ROI in social media (and Twitter is no exception). What we learn by looking at the commonly-held beliefs and then comparing them to people like Avinash Kaushik (and he’s not the only one), is that Twitter is simply an open publishing platform. It’s a place for people to put content (short, 140 characters worth of text-based content) and that success can often come from not following the rules, but by breaking them. Why? Twitter (like blogs, podcasts and YouTube ) is simply a publishing platform. Twitter (and many of the other social media channels) allow individuals and brands to highlight, share and connect on the things that can’t be explained in a traditional advertising campaign or through press releases. As with everything in life, people like real interactions between real human beings, and these channels are most effective when brands and individuals start doing the things that they think are interesting in the hopes that other’s feel that way too. Often, breaking all of the rules is what it takes to develop your own best case studies, ROI and metrics.   Mitch Joel is president of Twist Image — an award-winning digital marketing agency. HIs first book, Six Pixels of Separation , named after his highly-successful blog and podcast of the same name is a business and marketing bestseller.

Read the full article →

Arianna Discusses The American Dream At The ‘Opportunity Nation’ Summit

November 24, 2011

On November 4th, Arianna participated in the “Opportunity Nation” Summit in New York City. Fareed Zakaria, New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg and others also participated in the Summit. The event is described on the “Opportunity Nation” website as follows: The summit will feature a small number of influential speakers who will speak both about their own experiences with opportunity – events and moments that shaped their lives – as well as highlight examples of how their work creates opportunity for others. The topic of discussion for Arianna’s appearance was the “American Dream.” Arianna appeared on-stage along with The Washington Post ‘s Michael Gerson, who was also a special assistant to President George W. Bush. “My view of what is happening is that almost as though we’re looking at a split-screen reality. And depending on which side of the screen you are looking at, you can be deeply pessimistic or deeply optimistic,” said Arianna. She mentioned that “one side of the screen” includes grim unemployment and foreclosure statistics. In addition, Arianna stated, the United States ranks “10th in upward mobility,” which she explained puts us “behind France.” She continued, that’s “as if France would be behind us in croissants and afternoon sex, because, you know, upward mobility is sort of at the heart of the American Dream.” Arianna also mentioned “the other side of the screen.” On that flip side, according to Arianna, “we do have an explosion of empathy and compassion and creativity at the community level very often.” She relayed a conversation that she had with Pastor Rick Warren in which the two discussed how “churches, synagogues and local institutions are coming together to make a difference.” Arianna also explained that the founding fathers of capitalism “all were very concerned about a moral foundation to capitalism,” but that today that “moral foundation” has fallen by the wayside. “It’s almost as though we went from a country that makes things, to a country that makes things up,” explained Arianna. She cited “credit default swaps, derivatives, you know ways to make money that do not add value” as the manifestation of this syndrome. She concluded, “The more we can strengthen the part of us that ultimately brings us together rather than tears us apart, the more likely it is that we’ll be able to get out of this crisis and not just survive, but thrive at a higher level.” Click here to view Arianna’s appearance (via C-SPAN). Her portion of the video begins at 01:07:00.

Read the full article →

David Suzuki: Don’t Say the D-word

November 24, 2011

A kerfuffle is raised every time a comedian, politician, or businessperson uses the F-word or the N-word. I understand that. But to me, the D-word is the most obscene. I’m referring to disposable . Let me explain. When I was a boy, we were poor and it was a big deal when my parents bought me a new coat. I would quickly outgrow it, and it would be passed on to my sister. My parents boasted that three of their children had worn the same coat. They weren’t concerned (nor were we kids) about gender differences or fashion; it was the coat’s ability to keep the wearer warm and its durability (now there’s a good D-word) that mattered. We now have an economic system in which companies must not only show a profit each year, they must strive for constant growth. If a product is rugged and durable, it creates a problem for even the most successful business — a diminishing and eventually saturated market. Of course, any product will eventually wear to a point where it can no longer be patched, so the market will continue to exist to replace worn products. But that’s not good enough in a competitive world driven by the demand for relentless growth in profits and profitability. So companies create an aura of obsolescence, where today’s product looks like a piece of junk when next year’s model comes out. We’ve lived with that for decades in the auto industry. I’ve always said a car is simply a means of getting from point A to point B, but it’s become far more than that. Some cars convey a sense of power, and cars become safe havens when loaded with cup holders, sound systems, and even TVs and computers. Some people even name their cars, talk to them, and care for them like babies — until next year’s models come along. It’s similar with clothing, even with outdoor attire beloved by environmentalists. We have a proliferation of choice based on colour, sexiness, and other properties that have nothing to do with function. I don’t understand torn blue jeans as a fashion statement, and I wish people would wear their pants till they spring their own leaks rather than deliberately incorporating tears. All of this is designed to get us to toss stuff away as quickly as possible so the economy can keep spinning. Nowhere is this more obvious than with electronic gadgets. When my wife lost the cord to charge her cellphone, she went to seven stores. None had the necessary plug for her phone. Finally she went back to the retailer that sold her brand only to be told that the cords for the new models don’t fit the old ones and hers was so old, it wasn’t even on the market any more. It was a year-and-a-half old. I remember when I was given the first laptop computer on the market. It had an LED display screen that let me see three lines at a time and a chip that stored about three pages of writing. But it was small and had word processing and a port to send my pieces by telephone. It revolutionized my life. I was writing a weekly column for the Globe and Mail and was able to send articles from Russia and even remote towns in the Amazon. A couple of years later, a much better laptop hit the market. It had an LCD screen, a huge memory, and it displayed almost a full page. I got one. A year later, I got a new model, and then half a year after that, another. Each served me well, but every year, new ones would appear that were faster, smaller, and lighter, with longer-life batteries and more bells and whistles. Try to get one fixed or upgraded, though. As with digital cameras, I was repeatedly told that it would cost more to fix an old laptop than to buy a new model. This is madness in a finite world with finite resources. At the very least, products should be created so components can be pulled apart and reused until they wear out. You see why I think the D-word is so obscene. Dr. David Suzuki is a scientist, broadcaster, author, and co-founder of the David Suzuki Foundation. Learn more at www.davidsuzuki.org .

Read the full article →

The Domestic Side Of Occupy Wall Street

November 3, 2011

Occupy Wall Street is bringing a whole new demographic to Lower Manhattan–a neighbourhood where the dress code from 9 to 5 is corporate formal and improvisation is scarce.

Read the full article →

Michel Kelly-Gagnon: Should We Trust the Government to Protect Our Online Privacy?

October 29, 2011

Privacy is logically a matter of individual conscience. It belongs to every individual to decide what he considers part of his private life and how much of it he is willing to expose to others. When you invite a friend into your home, when you walk in the street, when you post something on the Internet, or when you make an economic transaction, you are releasing some information about you. In other words, social life necessarily involves a breach of privacy, and it is — or should be — up to each individual to decide which trade-off he is willing to make between the benefits of privacy and the benefits of social interaction. Of course, there are costs to whatever one chooses. One can’t have both the benefits of total privacy and the benefits of total social immersion. Sacrificing some social life in favour of privacy involves a cost; sacrificing some privacy in order to have more of a social life does too. But ultimately, that is a matter for each one of us to decide. As more and more of our social life seems to be going on in the virtual world of the Internet, this is the kind of fundamental principle that should inform the debate about privacy online. Unfortunately, this as on so many other issues, calls for the government to take this responsibility away and to decide on behalf of all of us have muddled the debate. For example, there have been more and more attacks on the privacy practices of large IT companies such as Google and Facebook in recent years. Governments are investigating Google for inadvertently collecting data transmitted to its Street View vehicles by unprotected home computer networks. Facebook is also under investigation by the Irish privacy commissioner for the way it uses its customers’ information. Now, in theory, nobody is forced to deal with Google or Facebook. If you stay inside your home or behind your garden walls, a Google Street View car will never see you. If you refuse to become friends with anyone on Facebook and you don’t post any pictures or information about yourself on the Internet, you will remain mostly invisible in that virtual world. There may of course be a high cost in avoiding Google, eschewing Facebook, and living as a recluse, but there is also a cost (a privacy cost) in making the opposite choice and trying, for example, to have as many friends and social connections as possible. Some people seem to think that individuals are not wise enough to make these choices, and that somebody has to decide for them and impose the same trade-off on everybody. I prefer to think that any individual, in matters concerning his own life, is wiser than anybody else. And that there is usually a way to solve these matters without recourse to government intervention. For example, private companies do have incentives to be careful with their customers’ data. Indeed, they usually have elaborate privacy policies . Google blurs faces and licence plate numbers from its street views, and you can ask them to delete more. This would be the case even without the threat of government intervention. Facebook bowed to pressure from users and privacy advocates and made various changes to simplify its privacy settings and allow less information to be shared and searched on its pages. Any private supplier can only use or request information from his customers up to the point where the marginal benefit for him stops outweighing the cost of bad publicity and the loss of unhappy customers. Free markets provide their own checks and balances, especially when hundreds of potential competitors are lurking. It is simply not possible to have everything — both to force companies to guarantee total privacy, and to have efficient social networks and information to which advertisers and investors will continue to flock. If somebody disagrees with that assessment, he is quite free to go and create the next search engine or social network, and use none of his customers’ data. Good luck! These views may seem unconventional in today’s debates, but they are not exactly far-fetched or original. I am simply proposing to rely mostly on private choices when dealing with privacy issue, something that should be obvious and logical. This is in opposition to the reigning ‘public,’ that is, government approach to this problem. There is indeed a great paradox here. The very governments which have built large databases with information that they legally force individuals to provide, which have created ID papers and systems that make individuals continuously traceable — these very governments are now harassing private companies that offer benefits in exchange for voluntarily giving up some privacy (or giving up privacy that is impossible to protect in an advanced society). Who will watch the watchdog? General legal rules are certainly necessary to facilitate life in society. But there is no place, in a free society, for bureaucrats and politicians to impose their uniform vision of privacy. Let every individual take care of his own privacy, and make the trade-offs he chooses. Let companies compete for offering consumers different mixes of privacy and other benefits. And let’s accept that, contrary to the public view of privacy, there is no panacea in politicians and government bureaucrats making such decisions for everybody.

Read the full article →

Will Straw, PhD: Where Have All the TVs Gone?

October 11, 2011

Over the last few years I’ve been struck, looking out at my undergraduate classes, by the sight of 80 or more Apple logos staring back at me from the backs of students’ notebook computers. Those reflecting on the legacy of Steve Jobs have emphasized the ubiquity of the iPhone and iPad, but I’m even more intrigued by the near monopoly Apple holds over the portable computer market for students, at least at McGill University where I teach. These 80 Mac owners are from a class of arts students that normally numbers just over a hundred. Another 10 or so students will bring no computer at all to class. A handful of others arrive bearing an assortment of netbooks (the hot electronics item of 2008) or Windows notebooks that range from the shiny and ultrathin through the big and clunky. We’re long past that brief historical moment when dudes wanted Dells for Christmas. I’ve visited other Canadian universities where classroom use of laptops by students is uncommon, either because official policies prohibit it or because students seem less able to afford them. In Latin American countries, I’ve counted fewer laptops in students’ hands and more Windows machines, and the economic reasons for this are easy to grasp. I’m told that the socio-economic background of McGill students is above the average for Canadian universities, and I suspect most of these students have grown up in peer groups and households where Mac ownership is commonplace. Still, Apple’s stranglehold on the student market, at least in my own institution, has never been adequately explained to me, except in the breathlessly enthusiastic language of the Apple cultist. Rightly or not, the superiority of Apple computers for consuming media content has long been touted and assumed. The ever-present student Macbook is probably one of the reasons why Canadians are cutting their subscriptions to cable television , as more and more young people watch television programming online, on their portable computers. The real story, it seems to me, isn’t how many people are cancelling cable but, rather, how few people of university student age even think of subscribing to it when they move away from home to set up apartments and attend university. In the absence of cable service, there is little incentive to buy a television set, either, since portable computers lend themselves more obviously to the personalized viewing, which characterizes so many people’s relationship to television these days. “None of my friends at school has a TV,” an undergraduate arts student told me last year, exaggerating only slightly. Like the disappearance of the landline telephone, the withering of cable will be less about long-time subscribers making a bold shift than about successive generations below them simply failing to sign up for a service they see as an unnecessary encumbrance. The effects of this are being felt across our media ecology. Without cable, people are less likely to buy television sets, which already serve in many homes as little more than expensive, overly-elaborate monitors for video games. With no need to purchase a bundle of services — landline telephones, cable television and Internet access — from major media industry players, consumers will be more easily drawn to cheaper, upstart sellers of single services, like Internet access or cell phone call time. The greatest error made by those who speculate about the future of media is to believe that people will forever desire a particular kind of experience — that of watching films with others in a darkened room, for example, or holding a musical recording in your hands, or getting a letter from someone whose handwriting you recognize. (All of these have been trotted out to convince us of the long-term survival of movie theatres, compact discs and handwritten correspondence.) For those who have grown up with such attachments, they may well be hard to shake. Media habits change, however, not because individuals shift their allegiances from the old to the new, but because younger generations grow up with little experience of the old and even less attachment to it. The portable computer carried onto campus on the first day of university is the sign of transformed habits that are rippling across our media landscape.

Read the full article →

1 In 25 Business Leaders Could be Psychopathic, Study Finds

September 1, 2011

One out of every 25 business leaders could be psychopathic, a study claims. The study, conducted by the New York psychologist Paul Babiak, suggests that they disguise the condition by hiding behind their high status, playing up their charm and by manipulating others.

Read the full article →

Beatrix Dart: Is Success a Choice for Women in Business?

August 22, 2011

I read an interesting blog the other day entitled ” Why Women Should Earn Less ” by Margaret Bogenrief. The author shared her frustrations with all the complaints she heard from women who claim “they do not get their fair shake” or “they are less powerful.” Her conclusion: stop underperforming, make better choices, and in particular stop blaming it all on the men. With 30 years of women’s movements, initiatives and corporate diversity programs under our collective belt, are we simply spinning our wheels? Is it all just a “cottage industry [that] has emerged making girls feel better about underperforming” as Bogenrief claims? I think it is about time to stop talking about “girls” and “women” as if they are all the same. A bit more segmentation of these three billion female inhabitants on earth might allow for better discussion. Clearly, the arguments are focused on the educated woman who was raised in a well-developed country and who has the skill set and the opportunity to work in high-powered positions — or so called “Extreme Jobs,” a phrase coined by Sylvia Ann Hewlett. We are dismissing in this debate the majority of women who stay in the workforce because they cannot afford not to work. We are also dismissing the group of women who will never get the opportunity to live out their ambitions, and there are plenty of reasons why that might happen. So if we focus on the lucky ones, the well-educated woman working in a society where equal opportunities and rights are provided regardless of gender, where she can gain a position with plenty of career potential, what’s going wrong? I can point to plenty of studies showing that women are just as motivated by money and recognition as men. If these women are not moving up into top positions, is it mainly because of their own choices? That would be a convenient answer. In my mind, there are multiple forces at play. Overt discrimination has all but vanished and many companies have been working hard to create patches to plug the “leaky” talent pipeline, which seems to lose women at every transition level up. A recent J. Barsh and L. Yee report produced for the WSJ Executive Task Force for Women in the Economy 2011 surveyed 2,500 men and women and came to the conclusion that the answer is a bit more complex than simply assuming women choose to opt out. They identified structural barriers such as lack of role models, exclusion from informal networks where important connections are made (such as on the golf course), and missing sponsors within the companies who would help to open up opportunities for the women. That is, unfortunately, hardly news. However, studies also indicate that women are looking (and staying) in jobs which allow them to achieve greater satisfaction across all parts of their lives, where they feel deeply connected and able to make a difference, and where they can work collaboratively with others. One of the worst obstacles for women in business seems to be the mindset. We moved on from overt discrimination to carrying implicit biases and stereotypes. We hear assumptions about how women (and men) should behave (“women take care, men take charge”). We hear about their limitations, and we see double standards for male and female performance evaluations. Women become eroded by society telling them they “can’t have it all” — and they believe it. This is where the women’s initiatives and women-specific programs can make a big difference. They help women establish a new perspective on their careers, opportunities and choices. As long as men are still promoted on the basis of their potential, but women only receive promotions on the basis of their actual performance, we need women-specific women programs and initiatives to be in place.

Read the full article →

States Sue Bank Of New York Mellon Over Pension Funds

August 11, 2011

RICHMOND, Va. — Virginia and Florida are suing the Bank of New York Mellon over the institution’s handling of both states’ pension funds. The Virginia lawsuit filed Thursday seeks $120 million in damages. It also seeks $811.6 million in civil penalties. Florida also is seeking damages and civil penalties. The Bank of New York Mellon holds about $54 billion in funds for the Virginia Retirement System. Florida’s system is worth some $120 billion. Both lawsuits accuse the bank of overcharging those pension funds on foreign currency transactions. The bank said in a statement that the lawsuits are unwarranted, and that the defendants will fight the claims in court.

Read the full article →

Art Brodsky: The Pebble in the Shoe of the Communications Workers Strike Against Verizon

August 11, 2011

There are two ways to look at the Communications Workers of America (CWA) strike against Verizon, mirror images of each other. (The International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers also is striking, but CWA is the main labor voice.) First: Why should the striking workers have it better than everyone else? Why should they get away with having paid-for health care and time off and all the other things that the company now wants to take away? Second: Why don’t other workers have it as good as the striking workers? Why don’t other people have paid-for health care and time off and all the other things that Verizon now wants to take away? Depending on how one looks at it, the strike could be seen as a last stand for a standard of living that’s rapidly vanishing. The political chattering classes like to make a big deal about the demise of the middle class in America, yet at the same time the government and business have done all they can to make sure that whatever middle class can struggle to survive doesn’t interfere with the rights of corporations to make as much money as they can (and to contribute as much money as they can to political campaigns). This is not the economy of the 1950s when unions were strong and the tax rates on the richest people were in the 70 percent range. Unions are decimated and demonized, tax rates on the wealthy and corporations are lower than ever, U.S. companies are busy shipping jobs overseas while sitting on big profits without having to hire U.S. workers or even try to bring the economy out of the doldrums. Financially, the company is doing well, with more than $30 billion in profits over the last three years on which they have paid no taxes — and even got $1 billion in tax benefits . So why Verizon going after the unions so that the company wants to do away with paid health care, cutting disability benefits, reducing sick days and holidays, to name just a few items on the bargaining table? Here’s the union’s list of Verizon management demands : • Wages – both annual and progression increases will be tied to your yearly evaluation. If you receive a “Does Not Meet Position Requirements” you will not receive an increase. • Eliminate Night and Saturday Differential • Eliminate Sunday premium pay. • Eliminate Double Time for hours past 49/week • Eliminate all Overtime Caps. • Eliminate city allowances. • Create new job titles for the consumer and business call centers that would work on a commission-based wage schedule. Pensions • Eliminate pension accruals. For anyone currently on the payroll your pension will be frozen as of December 31, 2011 and after that, there will be no more pension plan. • Eliminate the Pension Cash-Out option. • Modify the 401(k) Plan and the CPS. • Eliminate the Sickness Death Benefit. Benefits • Eliminate the current health care, prescription, dental, and vision plans and offer plans with high deductibles and contributions. • Eliminate accident disability benefits. • Cut in half the sickness disability benefits. • Reduce sick time pay to 5 days per year for those members with 20 or more years; 4 days for those with 15-20 years; 3 days for those with 7-15 years; 2 days for those with 2-7 years; 0 days for those with less than 2 years. • Reduce Paid Holidays to seven. Job Security • Eliminate the Job Security Provisions for all employees. • Eliminate the Movement of Work Protection • Eliminate the 35 mile transfer provision • Eliminate provisions in Force Adjustment Plan • Eliminate New Contracting Initiatives agreement – which would allow them to increase the level of contracting Other • Eliminate the Next Step Program • Eliminate the half day on Christmas Eve • Reduce the notice to the Union on Major technological changes from 6 months to 30 days • Eliminate the Dependent Care Reimbursement Fund In most sectors, there is international competition depressing prices and competition to see who can hire the cheapest overseas labor. But telecommunications is not one of those sectors. The industry has the type of jobs not easily shifted overseas. Maintaining a telecom network and serving customers has to be done by people in the area. Verizon is stuck with American workers and their salaries and benefits. Much of the angst has come because the wireline side of the business is supposedly lagging, at least in comparison to the wireless side of the house. Even so, the high-speed connections market is growing, and the average revenue per user Verizon collects is growing as well. Even if one concedes that wireline is lagging, what is the justification for treating workers in the wireless side the same way? The Wall Street Journal reports that the few union workers in the wireless business have already taken the same cuts that Verizon wants to impose on union workers in the wireline business. Here is one piece the company’s response that exemplifies the conflict: “Today, Verizon spends $4 billion annually on employee health care, and certain representatives of CWA’s described ‘middle class’ workforce earn a total of $140,000 annually in total compensation and benefits. Faced with these realities, the company must make changes to its cost structure to remain competitive.” There are a couple of responses here. First, if Verizon really was concerned about rising health care costs, it should have supported a progressive health care bill — a public option, single-payer plan, for example. Second, so what if some of the ‘middle class’ work force earns $140k? I’d bet that many white-collar types do. What’s the problem with some union members earning it? With seniority and OT, that’s not a big deal. And third, with whom is the company concerned about remaining competitive? It has a near-monopoly on landline businesses and could soon find itself in a duopoly on the wireless side of which it now has close to 40% of the business. If any companies are sitting pretty these days, phone companies come the closest. The industry has dominated the regulatory apparatus so that, in the name of “deregulation,” most competition and consumer choice has been eliminated. It has spread sufficient wealth in the legislature to members of both parties so that any attempts to impose any rules that enable competition, fairness or consumer choice are met with immediate denunciations and angry letters with many signatures. Now we come to the pebble-in-the-shoe. Despite the general sympathy one might have for the unions as they fight to preserve their benefits, the policies the CWA follows can’t help but generate not a little schadenfreude. We ask: Why is telecom policy the exception to the generally progressive union policies? Further: Why with the company taking such a hostile attitude toward its workers, would the union stroll arm in arm with Verizon (and with AT&T for that matter) through the telecom public policy world supporting policies that hurt consumers? What benefits can they possibly derive from supporting the companies’ efforts to do away with an Internet in which everyone has an equal opportunity to get online? Does the union think that by supporting AT&T’s takeover of T-Mobile that the company will go easier on them when their contracts come up (even as the odds of the deal happening are dropping) ? Why does the union defend the companies at every turn, even defending the loss of jobs because the traditional wireline business is fading? It would be nice if coming out of this strike, and anticipating negotiations with AT&T or other companies, CWA would take a more enlightened stand toward consumers generally, along with concern for union members and jobs. Given the union’s history, however, it’s not likely.

Read the full article →

Michel Kelly-Gagnon: Regulating Advertisement Won’t Make Us Behave

June 25, 2011

Do you trust yourself to make the best decisions in your own interest when it comes to what you eat, what you drink, and all the various products that you buy on the market? If so, you must be deluded. Otherwise, why would the government and various groups of do-gooders want to prevent you from even seeing the name of some products for fear that you may not resist the urge to buy them? That’s the logic supporting the many regulations that exist on products such as cigarettes, alcohol and fast food. True, these products may have some negative side effects, especially when consumed in large quantities. But they are still legal and you can buy them anytime you want. Our nanny state however has decided that it needs to hold our hand and shield our eyes from temptation, because we are too immature to make that decision alone. The zeal of government bureaucrats in imposing these rules sometimes reaches absurd heights. Last year, the Gilles-Villeneuve Museum, located in Berthierville, Quebec, decided to stage a small exhibition of pictures of the late racing champion in Montreal during the Grand Prix. Of course, you could see the name Marlboro on several of those pictures, the cigarette company being one of Villeneuve’s major sponsors in the 1970s. Some inspectors for the provincial department of health and social services visited the exhibition and decided that this was a crime . The museum itself is exempted from article 24.1 of the law on tobacco advertising, but not a private room open to the public in another venue. The government decided a couple of days later not to fine the museum for $2,000 after the news caused uproar in the media. That may be an extreme case, but the trend is clear. In many countries around the world, governments are increasingly likely to regulate the advertising industry. Whether in the name of consumer protection or health concerns, advertising for products that are perfectly legal must conform to ever stricter rules. This worldwide trend was recently highlighted by the head of planning for a well respected ad agency in the British newsweekly the Observer . He predicted that governments, instead of banning the sale of certain products outright, would increasingly turn to prohibiting their advertisement. Along the same lines, a group of American health professionals has just called for the retirement of mascot Ronald McDonald. The same group campaigned against mascot Joe Camel in the 1990s. This insistence on protecting consumers from themselves rests on the belief that advertising actually creates a demand for a product. Regulating or banning advertising is therefore thought of as an effective way to reduce the consumption of those products. People who are committed to “helping” others, with or without their consent, are not inclined to question that belief. For them, it’s simply a moral imperative. But it is still possible to study social behaviour and check if this is scientifically valid. There are certainly good reasons to doubt that advertising is required to create or sustain demand for a product. If this perception were true, the consumption of illegal drugs, for example, would not be so widespread. Similarly, the consumption of alcohol did not decrease substantially during American Prohibition. And how to explain that the legalization of alcohol-related advertising in Saskatchewan in 1983 did not lead to increased consumption ? Or that the banning of beer ads in 1974 in Manitoba did not diminish consumption in that province as compared with Alberta, where advertising remained legal? In a case of a new product such as computer tablets, advertising of course serves to make consumers aware of its existence and to develop a new market. But for the bulk of advertising, which focuses on already established products, it simply does not increase demand. So, you may ask, why do businesses spend so much on advertising? Quite simply to capture the largest possible market share and to steal customers from their competitors. For example, Peter will remain indifferent to a beer ad if he never drinks beer. On the other hand, for a beer drinker like John, it is possible that the ad will lead him to choose one brand over another. There is a large amount of empirical research that shows this to be the case. Advertising informs people about the choices available to them, or about the characteristics of certain products. But when all is said and done, the choice remains the consumer’s. What a company hopes to do when it advertises a product is promote what it can do better than its competitors and establish the best possible brand image. In this game, what one gains, another loses, and total consumption is not affected in the vast majority of cases. There is a lesson here for governments and for those do-gooder lobby groups who want us to behave like proper children. Instead of regulating whole industries, why not give customers the information they need to make what you believe are better choices? If you think advertising is so influential, why not advertise your own theories and values and let free individuals decide for themselves?

Read the full article →

15,000 Workers Out In Toronto, Montreal

June 14, 2011

THE CANADIAN PRESS — OTTAWA — The federal government appears to have ruled out back-to-work legislation for now in the labour dispute that is increasingly disrupting mail service at Canada Post. Acknowledging concern about the impact of the dispute on the economy, the parliamentary secretary to federal Labour Minister Lisa Raitt said Monday that the government is still hoping for a negotiated settlement. “The best solution is one that the parties come up with together, by themselves,” Conservative MP Kellie Leitch told the House. “The minister is monitoring the situation closely and will continue to provide the parties with the support and assistance required through the mediator.” But there was no sign the two sides were any closer to an agreement and, late Monday, the Canadian Union of Postal Workers identified Toronto and Montreal as its latest strike targets. About 15,000 CUPW members in the two cities were slated to walk off the job just before midnight for 24 hours in the union’s continuing series of rotating strikes. Meanwhile, spokesmen for the CUPW and Canada Post both stepped up their rhetoric in an effort to paint the other side as irresponsible. Canada Post spokesman Jon Hamilton accused the union of undermining the future viability of the service, saying the series of rotating strikes was chasing away long-time customers, possibly for good. Hamilton said the Crown corporation had lost $65 million in direct revenue since the work stoppages began June 3, including $35 million in cancelled contracts. “They are digging to the bone, they are pushing major customers to go to the competition,” he said in an interview. “There are spin-off losses, there are customers cancelling contracts, there are customers moving away and there are Canadians not putting mail on the general mail stream.” Hamilton warned some of the lost business may never return, undermining a service that already faces fierce competition from the private sector and the Internet. Union president Denis Lemelin accused Canada Post of trying to provoke a general strike with its decision to reduce postal service to three days a week in most cities starting this week. “Canada Post wants a full-scale strike and back-to-work legislation,” he told reporters at a morning news conference. Lemelin disputes that the work stoppages are severely damaging Canada Post, saying only 30 per cent of the country has been affected. He displayed two photographs purporting to show backlogs of mail ready to be processed. Canada Post shutting down for one day would have more impact on the country than the total of the union’s actions so far, said Lemelin, who described the tactic by Canada Post as a “partial lockout” designed to get Ottawa to legislate an end to the dispute. The union has offered to return to work under the conditions of the expired contract, but Canada Post has rejected the offer. Hamilton said the Crown corporation is not going to take on the costs the union is demanding for “short-term peace.” Lemelin has kept the option of a general strike open, but has given no sign that one is imminent. The union executive meets virtually daily to decide which location or locations will walk off the job next, or whether the time had come to escalate the strike action. Postal workers in Red Deer, Alta., spent the weekend on strike and employees in 10 other places walked off the job next. Strikes began late Sunday in Corner Brook, N.L.; Fredericton; Cape Breton, N.S.; the Quebec towns of Trois-Rivieres and Sherbrooke; Cornwall, Windsor and Niagara Falls in Ontario; Regina, and Nanaimo, B.C.. By Julian Beltrame, The Canadian Press

Read the full article →

National Retail Properties, Inc. Announces New and Expanded $450 Million Unsecured Credit Facility

May 25, 2011

ORLANDO, FL, May 25, 2011 /PRNewswire/ — National Retail Properties, Inc. (NYSE: NNN), a real estate investment trust, today announced the closing of a new $450 million unsecured credit facility, replacing its existing $400 million credit facility.   The new facility matures May 2015, with an option to extend maturity to May 2016. The facility is priced at LIBOR plus 150 basis points. The new facility also includes an accordion feature to increase the facility size to $650 million. Wells Fargo Securities LLC and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated were joint lead arrangers and joint book-runners of this credit facility with Wells Fargo Bank, National Association as the Administrative Agent and Bank of America N.A. as the Syndication Agent. Documentation Agents were PNC Bank, National Association, Royal Bank of Canada and U.S. Bank, National Association. Other bank participants include BB&T, Citibank N.A., SunTrust Bank, Capital One, N.A., and Raymond James Bank, FSB. “We greatly appreciate the strong support of our bank group and the confidence they have in our business,” said Kevin B. Habicht (top right photo), Executive Vice President and CFO.   “This expanded facility gives us significant financial flexibility and enhances our ability to take advantage of acquisition opportunities which helps us perpetuate NNN’s track record of 21 consecutive increases in our annual dividend.” National Retail Properties invests primarily in high-quality retail properties subject generally to long-term, net leases. As of March 31, 2011, the company owned 1,223 Investment properties in 46 states with a gross leasable area of approximately 13.3 million square feet. For more information on the company, visit www.nnnreit.com. Contact: Kevin B. Habicht, Chief Financial Officer, +1-407-265-7348

Read the full article →

700 New Condos Still Unsold In Downtown West Palm Beach

May 25, 2011

MIAMI, FL–Even though buyers acquired more developer units per month in the first 90 days of 2011 than a year earlier, the Downtown West Palm Beach market still has more than 700 new condos unsold from the South Florida real estate boom, according to a new report from CondoVultures.com. As of March 31, 2011, the unsold new condo inventory represents nearly 21 percent of the more than 3,400 units created in Downtown West Palm Beach since 2003, according to the report based on the Condo Vultures® Official Condo Buyers Guide To Downtown West Palm Beach And Palm Beach Island™.   In the first quarter of 2011, buyers acquired an average of 12 new condos per month at a blended price of $236 per square foot in Downtown West Palm Beach, according to an analysis of Palm Beach County records. This year’s new condo sales activity represents a nine percent increase in transactions from the first quarter of 2010 when an average of 11 units were acquired per month at a blended price of $232 per square foot. “At the current sales pace in this all-cash market, Downtown West Palm Beach has nearly five years of available inventory remaining,” said Peter Zalewski, a principal with the Bal Harbour, Fla.-based real estate consultancy Condo Vultures® LLC. “The good news is, Downtown West Palm Beach has fewer unsold new condos than the markets of Greater Downtown Miami, South Beach, and Sunny Isles Beach in Miami-Dade County. “The bad news is, Downtown West Palm Beach’s total unsold inventory number does not include some 500 units that were previously acquired in distressed bulk deals by out-of-town investment groups that are now trying to resell the condos at a profit to individual purchasers.”   Peter Zalewski of Condo Vultures® can be reached at 800-750-0517 or by email at peter@condovultures.com .

Read the full article →

Grubb & Ellis Company’s Ernest L. Brown IV Elected to CCIM Institute’s Board of Directors

May 24, 2011

  SAN ANTONIO, TX (May 24, 2011) – Grubb & Ellis Company (NYSE: GBE), a leading real estate services and investment firm, today announced that Ernest L. Brown IV, CCIM (top right photo ), executive vice president and managing director of the company’s San Antonio office, has been elected to the board of directors of the CCIM Institute, a global leader in commercial and investment real estate education and services.   Brown was one of 18 Certified Commercial Investment Members elected to the board responsible for voting on policy, procedural and financial issues pertaining to the organization, its membership and educational programs.   He will serve a three-year term beginning January 2012.     Brown has more than 27 years of commercial real estate experience and as managing director, oversees roughly 30 employees.   He is the director of the Austin/San Antonio regional chapter of NAIOP, serves on the board of trustees of the Texas Military Institute and is president of the Texas Military Institute Alumni Association.   Brown holds a bachelor’s degree from the University of the South. Contact: Julia McCartney, Phone: 714.975.2230                                       Email: julia.mccartney@grubb-ellis.com           

Read the full article →

HFF arranges refinancing for multi-housing community in Houston’s Galleria area

May 24, 2011

  HOUSTON, TX – HFF announced today that it has arranged refinancing for Tree Tops at Post Oak (top left photo), a 112-unit multi-housing community in Houston’s Galleria area. Working exclusively on behalf of Venterra Realty, HFF placed the seven-year, 3.90 percent adjustable-rate loan with Freddie Mac (Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation).   HFF will service the loan through its Freddie Mac Program Plus® Seller/Servicer program. Located at 4510 Briar Hollow Place inside the 610 Loop, Tree Tops at Post Oak is close to the Houston Galleria, Uptown Park and Highland Village.   The property has two three-story buildings with one- and two-bedroom units averaging 741 square feet each.   Residents have access to a swimming pool and fitness center as well as reserved and covered parking.   Tree Tops at Post Oak is 95 percent leased. The HFF team that represented Venterra Realty was led by director Cortney Cole (lower right photo). Venterra specializes in the identification, finance, acquisition and management of multi-family residential communities in the southern United States.   Venterra currently manages a portfolio of multi-family real estate assets totaling over $600 million in value that generates gross annual income in excess of $80 million.   The organization has completed in excess of $1.3 billion of real estate transactions.   Venterra has offices in both Houston and Toronto and employs over 350 people. Contacts:   Cortney R. Cole, HFF Director,   (713) 852-3500, ccole@hfflp.com   Kristen M. Murphy, HFF Associate Director, Marketing, (713) 852-3500 krmurphy@hfflp.com                                       ,                                                  

Read the full article →

HFF closes sale of and arranges financing for One and Two Park Ten Place in Houston’s Energy Corridor

May 24, 2011

    HOUSTON, TX – HFF announced today that it has closed the sale of and arranged financing for One and Two Park Ten Place (top left photo) , two office buildings totaling 91,166 square feet in Houston’s Energy Corridor. The HFF investment sales team marketed the property on behalf of the seller, KBS Realty Advisors.   A Miami-based investor purchased One and Two Park Ten Place for an undisclosed amount.   HFF arranged the fixed-rate acquisition financing on behalf of the buyer through Morgan Stanley Mortgage Capital, Inc. One and Two Park Ten Place are located at 16300 and 16365 Park Ten Place Drive at the northwest corner of Interstate 10 and Park Row in west Houston.   The properties are 92 percent leased overall to tenants including Ensco. The HFF investment sales team representing KBS Realty Advisors was led by senior managing director Dan Miller and associate director Martin Hogan.   HFF senior managing director Susan Hill arranged the financing on behalf of the buyer. KBS Realty Advisors, an SEC-registered investment advisor, and its affiliate, KBS Capital Advisors, are one of the nation’s largest buyers of commercial real estate and structured debt investments, having consummated more than $16.5 billion in transactional volume. Contacts: H. Dan Milller, CCIM, SIOR, HFF Senior Managing Director, (713) 852-3500, Susan L. Hill, HFF Senior Managing Director, (713) 852 3500 dmiller@hfflp.com shill@hfflp.com Kristen M. Murphy, HFF Associate Director, Marketing, (713) 852-3500, krmurphy@hfflp.com                       

Read the full article →

Arizona’s Only Beachfront Resort to Mark Memorial Day Weekend with Opening of State’s Largest Infinity Pool

May 24, 2011

  LAKE HAVASU CITY, AZ — Nautical Beachfront Resort (top left photo) , Arizona’s only beachfront resort hotel, will open the state’s largest infinity pool, “WET,” Friday May 27, just in time for the Memorial Day Weekend.   In honor of the occasion and to kick off the holiday weekend, members of the city’s VFW Post 9401 have been invited to be the first residents to get WET at 4 p.m. “We like to have fun at Nautical Beachfront Resort, but we’re also mindful that Memorial Day is a meaningful holiday,” said Tim Peters , general manager.   “So, we wanted to honor our local veterans by inviting them to christen our pool.   American soldiers are often the first to respond in times of crisis, this time they can be the first ones in on the fun.” WET, a free-form pool roughly the size of a stadium Jumbotron and filled with 108,000 gallons of water, is part of the first wave of property enhancements planned by the resort’s owners, RW Partners LLC of Phoenix.   A new arrival center, scheduled to open later this summer, is also under way.   Media Contact :   Lauralee Dobbins/Chris Daly, 703-435-6293, Lauralee@Dalygray.com

Read the full article →

Grubb & Ellis Facilitates 60,000-SF Office Lease Renewal in Clearwater, FL

May 24, 2011

  TAMPA, FL– Grubb & Ellis Company (NYSE: GBE), a leading real estate services and investment firm,   announced that it represented Meridian Development Group in CCS Medical Inc.’s 60,000-square-foot office lease renewal at Meridian Concourse Center (top left photo) , located at 4800 140th Ave. N in Clearwater.   James Moler (middle right photo) , CCIM, and Paula Buffa (lower left photo) , RPA, CCIM, both senior vice presidents with Grubb & Ellis’ Office Group, exclusively represented the landlord in the transaction.   Brent Miller with Jones Lang LaSalle represented the tenant.   “CCS Medical evaluated numerous options in the market for the consolidation of their operations,” said Moler.   “Our building was looked at very favorably due to the overall quality of the asset, the responsiveness of property management and the long-standing relationship between the owner and the tenant.”   “We put a lot of resources into the development and management of our properties,” said Steven Kossoff, managing director, Meridian Development Group, “but our tenant relationships are just as important.   Flexibility and attention have been cornerstones for us since we began and have helped us make it through this tough market.”   Meridian Development Group owns and manages 1.5 million square feet of Class A and B office, flex and industrial assets located across west-central Florida.   Meridian Concourse Center is comprised of four buildings totaling 214,000 square feet.   4800 140th Avenue totals 60,000 square feet; all of which CCS Medical currently occupies.   The property’s central Tampa Bay location provides convenient access to both Pinellas and Hillsborough Counties and is adjacent to the St. Petersburg/Clearwater Airport.     For more information, contact   Moler at 813.830.7963 or james.moler@grubb-ellis.com   or Buffa at 813.830.7887 or   paula.buffa@grubb-ellis.com   or Rachel Andreozzi, Phone: 561.893.6296, rachel.andreozzi@grubb-ellis.com

Read the full article →

NAI Realvest Extends Hudson Restaurant Property Online Auction to June 8

May 24, 2011

ORLANDO, FL — Paul P. Partyka (top right photo), managing partner at NAI Realvest in Maitland, is going online to sell a 9,367 square foot restaurant building on a 2.8 acre site in Hudson to the highest bidder on June 8. Partyka said the facility, located on S.R. 52 in Hudson between U.S. 19 and County Road 1, is well located on a busy thoroughfare, posts daily traffic counts that range between 30,000 and 63,000, surrounded by residential neighborhoods. “It’s an excellent opportunity for development as a restaurant or for redevelopment with another use,” Partyka said. Buyers of mid-range commercial facilities don’t often tour Hudson looking for opportunities. “The online auction format offers us an excellent opportunity,” Partyka said. “We can present to a worldwide audience of potential bidders who are more interested in the facts—demographics, location, facility size, parking—than the general area,” he explained. NAI Realvest designed a special web site for the auction at NAIauction.com/Hudson, and bids will be accepted online from 11 a.m. to 3 p.m. on Wednesday, June 8. For more information,   contact: Paul P. Partyka Principal, Managing Partner, NAI Realvest, 407-875-9989 ppartyka@realvest.com ; Patrick Mahoney, President NAI Realvest, 407-875-9989 pmahoney@realvest.com   Beth Payan or Larry Vershel, Larry Vershel Communications 407-644-4142 lvershelco@aol.com NAI Realvest Negotiates New Long-Term Office Lease at Primera in Lake Mary, FL ORLANDO, FL — NAI Realvest recently negotiated a five-year lease agreement for 1,380 square feet of office space at Suite 125, Primera Court I, 725 Primera Blvd. in Lake Mary.   NAI Realvest Senior Broker Associate Mary Frances West , CCIM brokered the transaction.    The landlord at Primera Court I is Interchange-Primera II, LLC based in Daytona Beach.     The new tenant RezZiliant, which provides IT services, offsite backup, Virtual and Server colocation, recovery and security services, and also has a division that develops Healthcare software, has relocated from Waterbury, Conn. Their website is www.rezziliant.com   and contact info is 1-866-581-4678 For more information, contact: Mary Frances West CCIM, NAI Realvest, 407-875-9989 mwest@realvest.com Patrick Mahoney, President NAI Realvest, 407-875-9989 pmahoney@realvest.com ; Beth Payan or Larry Vershel, Larry Vershel Communications, 407-644-4142 or 407-461-3780 Lvershelco@aol.com NAI Realvest Negotiates 10 Year Lease in South Daytona, FL MAITLAND, FL.   – NAI Realvest recently negotiated a ten-year lease of the 11,414 square foot former Whistle Junction facility at 1854 South Ridgewood Ave. in South Daytona. Paul P. Partyka, principal and managing partner at NAI Realvest, along with principals Matt Cichocki (lower right photo)  and Kevin O’Connor (lower left photo), negotiated the transaction representing the landlord, SBI Leasing of Titusville.   The new tenant is Fort Myers-based Ocean Buffet, Inc., who was represented by Josephine Wang of Carlino Commercial Group.   It will be the third location for Ocean Buffet when it is anticipated to open in July.   The firm also operates Ocean Buffet restaurants in Fort Myers and St. Augustine, Cichocki said. This is also the eighth transaction involving a buffet style restaurant that the NAI Realvest team has completed in the last 18 months. For more information, contact:    Paul P. Partyka, Managing Partner/Principal, NAI Realvest, 407-875-9989; ppartyka@realvest.com Matt Cichocki or Kevin O’Connor, Principals, NAI Realvest, 407-875-9989; mcichocki@realvest.com; koconnor@realvest.com Patrick Mahoney, President, NAI Realvest, 407-875-9989 pmahoney@realvest.com Larry Vershel or Beth Payan, Larry Vershel Communications, 407-644-4142                   

Read the full article →

Beck Hires Harri Jarvenpaa as Senior Designer

May 23, 2011

  ATLANTA, GA (May 23, 2011) – The Beck Group’s Atlanta office said today that Harri M. Jarvenpaa (top right photo) , AIA, LEED AP, has joined the team as a senior designer. Harri has more than 15 years of experience in healthcare design and complex high-rise mixed-use construction. In his new role with Beck, Harri will manage pre-development services, conceptual design and facilitate meetings with municipal zoning and code officials. During his career, Harri has managed and designed projects in Georgia, Texas, Florida, Colorado, North Carolina and Virginia. The majority of these project budgets were between $50 million and $100 million. “Harri has extensive experience in healthcare design and construction,” said Fred Perpall (lower  left photo by KARL W. RITZLER/Special from Atlanta Journal Constitution) managing director of Beck’s Eastern Division. “This skillset will be a great asset to our design team.” Before joining Beck, Harri was a senior designer with The Peacock Partnership in Atlanta. His career has also included positions with The Preston Partnership and Smallwood, Reynolds, Stewart, Stewart and Associates. Harri is a member of the American Institute of Architects and the U.S. Green Building Council. He holds a Bachelors of Architecture from Mississippi State University. Dallas-based Beck is a full-service builder. Beck is in the business of devising solutions for clients needs through the development of real estate, the design of architecture and interiors and the construction of buildings.  Beck serves a wide range of industries, including arts, corporate, healthcare, entertainment, religious and education. Beck has more than 500 employees, many of whom are LEED-accredited professionals, working from a network of offices in Atlanta, Austin, Dallas, Denver, Fort Worth, Mexico City, San Antonio and Tampa. For more information, go to www.beckgroup.com .   Contact: Laura Dudebout O: 404.965.5023 C: 678.642.4301 ldudebout@wilbertnewsstrategies.com

Read the full article →

Robert Stavins: In Defense of Markets

September 13, 2010

Cap and trade has been demonized by conservatives as part of an effective strategy to stop climate legislation from moving forward in the U.S. Congress. As I wrote in my previous blog post (“Beware of Scorched-Earth Strategies in Climate Debates,” July 27, 2010), this unfortunate tarnishing of market-based instruments for environmental protection will come back to haunt conservatives and liberals alike when it becomes politically difficult to use the power of the marketplace to reduce business costs in the pursuit of a wide variety of environmental objectives. Cap and trade has been vilified as a national energy tax, an elaborate Ponzi scheme, and a giveaway to corporate polluters. The fact that none of these attacks are factually correct has not seemed to reduce their political effectiveness. This is one element of the poisonous atmosphere that has come to dominate so much of national political discourse, at least in this election year. When Senate leaders decided they could not assemble the sixty votes necessary to cut off debate on meaningful climate legislation, they pulled nationwide, economy-wide cap and trade off the table, quite possibly until after a new Congress is seated in January of 2013. But when serious attention is again given to meaningful national climate policy, as it surely will be, consideration will inevitably include carbon-pricing, whether in the form of carbon taxes or cap-and-trade, because these approaches have tremendous advantages over the alternatives (” The Real Options for U.S. Climate Policy ,” June 23rd, 2010). Therefore, it is important to set the record straight, and respond to at least some of the attacks that have been made on cap and trade specifically and carbon pricing broadly. That is the fundamental purpose of an Issue Brief Dr. Janet Peace and I have written. Our report, “In Brief: Meaningful and Cost Effective Climate Policy: The Case for Cap and Trade,” was published by the Pew Center on Global Climate Change in June of 2010. In today’s blog post, I will highlight just a few of our findings. Questions and Concerns While the justification for putting a price on carbon emissions seems straightforward to most policy analysts, some of the public and even some policymakers have questioned whether creating a market for greenhouse gas (GHG) reductions would be a cure worse than the disease itself: * Why employ market-based approaches to GHG emission reductions, when markets are subject to manipulation? * Would a market-based approach to reducing greenhouse gas emissions be a corporate handout? * Can markets be trusted to reduce emissions? * Will a market-based approach, such as cap-and-trade, be too costly? * Are other approaches likely to be more effective and less complicated? In our Pew Center report , Peace and I respond to all of these questions, but in today’s blog post I will highlight our response just to the first question. For the full and complete story, I urge readers to see the original report , which can be downloaded freely from the Pew Center’s web site. Why create a market for GHG emissions when markets — in general — are subject to manipulation and have failed terribly? With the U.S. economy experiencing its worst recession since the Great Depression , amidst corporate scandals, pyramid schemes, and a series of government bailouts, some members of the public as well as elected officials have come to question the ability of markets to perform their basic functions. Despite the past successes of market mechanisms to address environmental problems such as acid rain , leaded gasoline , and stratospheric ozone depletion , this growing distrust of markets has led some to question whether market-based approaches are appropriate instruments to help tackle the exceptionally challenging problem of global climate change. The storyline goes roughly like this: Establishing a “carbon market” for greenhouse gas emissions opens the door for financial intermediaries — banks and brokers — to be involved. Since we know that they cannot be trusted and only care about making profits (and not about reducing emissions), how could any approach that involves them be part of an effective solution? In reality, of course, our recent economic turmoil does not mean that “markets” in any general sense do not work; only that markets require appropriate oversight. Our economy fundamentally is a market-based system, but oversight — including, where appropriate, effective rules and regulations — can be essential to ensure transparency and prevent manipulation. With appropriate rules and oversight, markets have been shown to work exceptionally well to address environmental problems . They provide key flexibility to regulated entities to adopt least-cost approaches to emission reductions, while providing powerful incentives for technological innovation and diffusion , which serve to reduce costs over time. Real world experiences with using market-based instruments for environmental protection include CFC trading under the Montreal Protocol (to protect the ozone layer); SO2 allowance trading under the U.S. Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 (to curb acid rain); NOx trading (to control regional smog in the eastern U.S.); and eliminating lead from gasoline in the 1980s . Studies that have evaluated the performance of these market-based approaches to environmental protection have found that they have achieved their environmental objectives and have done so at lower cost than conventional, command-and-control approaches. Estimates of cost savings range from 7 percent to 96 percent, with more than half of studies showing that market-based programs cut the cost of regulation by more than 50% compared with command-and-control options. For example, the SO2 allowance trading program resulted in 33 percent cost savings — on the order of $1 billion annually, while reducing power-sector emissions from 15.7 million tons in 1990 to 7.6 million tons million tons in 2008. The phase-down of leaded gasoline in the 1980s, which employed trading of environmental credits, was also successful in meeting its environmental targets , while yielding cost savings of about $250 million per year. The evidence is incontrovertible — market-based approach to environmental protection can work, effectively achieving environmental targets and keeping costs to a minimum. These approaches are not deregulation, but reformed and improved regulation. And like all markets, these environmental markets need rules and oversight. A Real and Pressing Problem The fundamental reason why we face the threat of global climate change is that there is no price or cost for emitting greenhouse gases. In the absence of a price, the damages associated with a changing climate are not considered by companies or individuals when they make their energy choices. A cap-and-trade policy creates this price by establishing a limit on the amount of greenhouse gas emissions and allowing firms covered by the program the flexibility to trade allowances. The environmental integrity of the program is ensured by the “cap” on emissions, and the costs of the program are kept as low as possible through the creation of a market (where firms can buy and sell allowances). Concern about financial markets and fraudulent investment scams has created an atmosphere of distrust regarding the functioning and effectiveness of markets. By extension, questions have been raised about the wisdom of creating a market with a cap-and-trade program for controlling greenhouse gases. In truth, appropriate oversight and regulation of carbon markets will be required. The problem has been the abuse of markets, not something fundamental about markets themselves. Climate change is a real and pressing problem. Strong government actions are required, as well as enlightened political leadership at the national and international levels. Creation of a market for greenhouse gas emissions can work, but is contingent on government action to establish this policy. When Congress decides to return to this issue -­- as it inevitably will — cap-and-trade policy specifically and carbon-pricing generally must be considered seriously and debated honestly, otherwise it will be fundamentally impossible to provide the right incentives to put the United States on a climate-friendly path of robust and sustainable economic growth. ———– P.S. For those of you interested in the important climate policy developments that are occurring in the state of California, you may find of interest a conference organized by the University of California, taking place in Sacramento on Oct. 4, “California’s Climate Change Policy: The Economic and Environmental Impacts of AB 32.” You can learn more about it by going here .

Read the full article →

Montreal Agency Plans 300M Bond Sale

September 11, 2010

Societe de Transport de Montreal STM Montreals transit agency is planning to sell bonds worth 300 million

Read the full article →

Canada Bankers’ Pay Will Be Little Changed in 2010, Vlaad Survey Finds

June 7, 2010

By Doug Alexander June 7 (Bloomberg) — Canadian investment bankers, some of whom had pay raises of as much as 25 percent last year, will see little change in their compensation in 2010 amid an equity markets slump, according to a survey by Vlaad and Co. “2010 is not going to be a vintage year,” said Bill Vlaad , president of the Toronto-based agency that recruits for financial-services firms. “Few are expecting 2010 to be more than mildly positive.” Employers in Canada are being cautious on compensation as a debt crisis in Europe lowers stock prices, curbs initial public offerings and threatens to derail a global economic recovery. At least 26 IPOs worldwide have been shelved in the last five weeks, including a C$120 million ($114 million) sale by the owner of Toronto-based Porter Airlines. “The reason for the muted view of 2010 is the lack of market depth,” Vlaad said in a June 4 interview. “While resources are hot, everything else is quiet and you need more than one area of the market to be hot to give stability.” Vlaad polled 600 investment bankers, research associates and analysts by phone over three months to measure pay at Canadian banks, foreign lenders and non-bank owned brokerages. The survey included professionals from Toronto, Vancouver, Calgary, Montreal, Winnipeg and Halifax. Canada’s six-biggest banks set aside C$4.31 billion for bonuses in the first half of the year, according to company filings, up 16 percent from C$3.71 billion for the year-earlier period. The total reflects the amount reserved, not paid out, and doesn’t include base salaries and other compensation. Investment Bankers Financial firms boosted compensation, including base salaries, on average by 10 percent last year, compared with pay cuts of 15 percent to 25 percent in 2008, Vlaad said. Among the group surveyed, senior-level investment bankers fared the best in 2009, with compensation up 5 percent to 25 percent from the year earlier. Managing directors had average raises of about 5 percent, Vlaad said, in part because many were put into long-term compensation plans. Among investment bankers, RBC Capital Markets’ New York- based co-head Mark Standish was awarded C$14 million for 2009, his first year in the role, making him the highest paid Royal Bank employee. His Toronto-based co-head, Doug McGregor , was paid C$13 million in his first year. Revamped Plans Canadian banks including Royal Bank of Canada , Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce, and Bank of Nova Scotia revamped their compensation policies last year to reduce risk as global leaders scrutinized bankers’ pay. The changes increased the amount of deferred compensation as well as “claw-back” policies in the event of fraud or misconduct. As a result, Canadian banks paid less compensation in cash and more in long-term incentive programs, according to Vlaad. Base salaries rose at foreign banks, while independents such as Canaccord Financial Inc. and Cormark Securities Inc. paid bonuses in cash. “The independents didn’t lose as many people as we thought, because although they’re paying lower levels they paid it in a form which is liquid,” Vlaad said. In research, associates averaged increases of 15 percent, as many failed to get promotions to higher-paying analyst positions, Vlaad said. Junior analysts saw pay packages either stay unchanged or drop as much as 5 percent, he said. “They were down because it was a tough year,” Vlaad said. “Usually these analysts are new to the role; they’re trying to build their name up and had to take it on the chin.” Pay for senior analysts ranged between little changed and up 5 percent, with increases tied to sectors such as mining and energy, Vlaad said. To contact the reporter on this story: Doug Alexander in Toronto at dalexander3@bloomberg.net

Read the full article →

Loan Selloff Forcing Calpine, Borrowers to Increase Rates Credit Markets

June 3, 2010

By Emre Peker June 3 (Bloomberg) — Calpine Corp. , the largest U.S. generator of natural-gas-fueled electricity, and at least five other borrowers are being forced to boost interest rates on proposed loans after the market’s worst month since 2008. The margin Calpine offered to pay over lending benchmarks for a $1.3 billion loan increased by as much as 2 percentage points to 5.5 percentage points, while the remaining companies had to raise rates from 0.75 percentage point to 4.5 percentage points, according to people familiar with the talks who declined to be identified because the terms weren’t set. For Houston- based Calpine, that’s an extra $26 million a year in interest. Prices of high-yield, high-risk loans fell 3.89 percent during last month as measured by the S&P/LSTA U.S. Leveraged Loan 100 Index as investors fled all but the safest government securities amid growing concern that rising budget deficits in Europe will cause the global economy to slow. The selloff created bargains among existing debt, reducing the attractiveness of new loans. “There’s a lack of desperation to buy new issue, it’s got to be compelling in terms of price and structure,” Jeff Cohen , a managing director of loan capital markets at Credit Suisse Group AG in New York, said in an interview. “Investors are being much more choosy, they’re seeing compelling opportunities in the secondary market that were not available prior to the recent market turbulence.” ‘Opportunity to Re-Price’ Styron Corp., the Dow Chemical Co. unit that Bain Capital LLC is buying, R3 Treatment Inc., Spectrum Brands Inc., Awas Aviation Capital Ltd. and U.S. Gas & Electric Inc. also offered more yield by proposing higher interest on loans, among other things, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. “The loan market is taking the global events and volatility in other risk markets as an opportunity to re-price deals,” Erik Falk , co-head of leveraged credit at KKR & Co.’s asset management unit with more than $13 billion in assets under management, said in an interview. Elsewhere in credit markets, the Federal Reserve said that U.S. commercial paper outstanding fell to the lowest on record, led by overseas financial issuers, bonds of BP Plc rose the most on record and the new issue market in the U.S. and Europe showed signs of thawing. Derivatives indexes show greater confidence among investors to own corporate bonds, while emerging-market debt rallied. Short-Term IOUs The U.S. market for short-term IOUs, commercial paper, declined $10.2 billion to $1.06 trillion in the week ended June 2, the lowest since at least 1999, data compiled by Bloomberg show. Without seasonal adjustment, debt outstanding fell $5.5 billion, the fifth straight week of declines, to $1.05 trillion, also the lowest on record. In Europe, financial companies’ overnight deposits with the European Central Bank rose to a record amid bank wariness of lending to each other during the continent’s sovereign debt crisis. Banks placed 320.4 billion euros ($389.9 billion) in the ECB’s overnight deposit facility at 0.25 percent, compared with 316.4 billion euros on June 2, the central bank said. That’s the most since the introduction of the euro in 1999. “The news flow over the past few weeks has spooked banks and since nobody knows how exposed individual financial institutions are, it’s deemed safer to park cash with the ECB rather than lend it on,” said Norbert Aul , an interest-rate strategist at Commerzbank AG in London. BP Rebounds BP’s 4.75 percent notes due in 2019, issued by the company’s finance unit, increased 3.5 cents to 93.68 cents on the dollar in New York, according to Trace, the bond price reporting system of the Financial Industry regulatory Authority. The debt fell to 90.1 cents on June 2, its lowest ever, amid concern about liabilities the company may face from the worst oil spill in U.S. history. “Investors are starting to get their hands around the potential exposures the spill companies may have,” said Joel Levington , managing director of corporate credit at Brookfield Investment Management Inc. Analysts expect BP can maintain its dividend, “which should be reassuring to the credit side,” Levington said. Rising investor confidence was reflected in the Markit CDX North America Investment Grade Index Series 14, which investors use to hedge against losses on corporate debt or to speculate on creditworthiness. The index dropped 0.4 basis point to a mid- price of 117 basis points in New York, according to Markit Group Ltd. A basis point is 0.01 percentage point. The index typically falls as investor confidence improves and rises as it deteriorates. Greece Swaps Credit-default swaps on European sovereign debt snapped three days of increases, with contracts on Greece declining 16 basis points to 722, according to CMA DataVision. The contracts pay the buyer face value if a borrower fails to meet its obligations, less the value of the defaulted debt. A basis point equals $1,000 annually on a contract protecting $10 million of debt. While company bond sales globally total $9.54 billion this week, compared with $18.2 billion during the period ended May 28, according to data compiled by Bloomberg, signs indicate that the new issue market is starting to open. Bank of Montreal , the fourth-largest Canadian bank, sold $2 billion of five-year covered bonds to lead $5.1 billion of issuance in the U.S., Bloomberg data show. Air Liquide SA , the world’s biggest producer of industrial gases sold the second European benchmark corporate bond since April, following from German railway company Deutsche Bahn AG’s offering on June 2. Tighter Spread Air Liquide sold 500 million euros ($609 million) of 10- year notes yielding 90 basis points more than the benchmark swap rate, tighter than the 100 basis-point spread first offered to investors, said a banker involved in the deal. In emerging markets, bond spreads shrank 6 basis points on average to 308, the narrowest since May 17 and down from last month’s high of 346 on May 20, according to JPMorgan Chase & Co.’s Emerging Market Bond index. Junk bond spreads were at 693 basis points on June 3, 151 basis points wider than this year’s low on April 26, according to Bank of America Merrill Lynch’s US High Yield Master II Index . Spreads in the leveraged loan market widened less than the speculative-grade bond market. High-yield, high-risk debt is rated below Baa3 by Moody’s Investors Service and BBB- by Standard & Poor’s. The S&P/LSTA 100 Index dropped 3.61 cents, or 3.89 percent, in May to 89.11 cents on the dollar, the most since falling 7.58 cents, or 10.71 percent, in November 2008. Since reaching the lowest level in almost two years on April 15, the average spread to maturity over the three-month London interbank offered rate for the most actively traded loans climbed 1.02 percentage points to 4.46 percentage points, according to S&P Leveraged Commentary and Data. ‘Financial Instability’ Libor, the rate banks charge to lend to each other, was set today at 53.78 basis points, or 0.537 percent, up from its record low of 24.88 basis points in February. Moelven Industrier ASA , a Norwegian forest products supplier, refinanced 1.05 billion kroner ($162 million) of loans with a five-year revolving credit line, extending maturities from July 2011, the company said in a statement . Moelven agreed to pay higher interest for the loan, adding 10 million kroner a year to total financing costs, it said. “Financial instability has contributed to a tightening of credit markets,” Moelven President Hans Rindal said in the statement. “The risk of such unstable market conditions arising is the reason” for the refinancing, he said. In the U.S., Styron canceled a $125 million second-lien debt deal and increased the capacity of its $675 million first- lien loan to $800 million. It also boosted the margin over Libor to 5.5 percentage points, from 4.75 percentage points. Deutsche Bank AG is arranging the financing, which may be sold at 98.5 cents to 99 cents on the dollar and backs Styron’s $1.63 billion buyout by Boston-based private equity firm Bain. Bank Flexibility U.S. Gas & Electric, the North Miami Beach, Florida-based retail energy marketer, offered lenders an all-in rate of 14 percent on the $125 million second-lien term loan it is seeking. The company had previously proposed to pay 7.5 percentage points to 8.5 percentage points more than Libor, with a 2 percent floor on the lending benchmark. “Many of the new issue loans are the syndication of deals banks had underwritten,” KKR’s Falk said. “The banks are using flexibility they have and working with investors to find levels that clear the market so they can move the loans and de-risk their balance sheets.” Leveraged loans fell as low as 88.71 cents on May 25 before climbing above 89 cents last week. The S&P/LSTA 100, which tracks the 100 largest dollar-denominated first-lien leveraged loans, rose June 3 by 0.16 cent to 89.07 cent on the dollar. “Given the broad calming in the credit markets, it seems like cash loans are starting to find a floor,” said Alex Stromberg , head of U.S. par-loan trading at Barclays Capital, the investment banking arm of Barclays Plc . “We would like to see some more stabilization in the high yield bond market before more real-money players start to come back into the loan market,” he said in a telephone interview from his New York office. To contact the reporter on this story: Emre Peker in New York at epeker2@bloomberg.net

Read the full article →

Covered Bond Sales Jump Amid Concern Over Creditworthiness Credit Markets

June 3, 2010

By Sonja Cheung and Caroline Hyde June 3 (Bloomberg) — Sales of covered bonds are accelerating as investors seek debt backed by collateral amid concern about the creditworthiness of governments and banks. About $7.7 billion of the securities have been sold or are being marketed this week worldwide, more than double last week’s total, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. Bank of Montreal , Canada’s fourth-largest bank, sold $2 billion of the bonds due in 2015. Demand for securities backed by mortgages and public-sector loans with top ratings is rising as European governments from Greece to Spain struggle to cut record budget deficits, threatening the region’s banks. Covered bonds returned 0.25 percent in May, compared with a 0.4 percent loss on global investment-grade company debt, Bank of America Merrill Lynch index data show. “In this new world where volatility is high,” it’s “certainly an advantage to be holding bonds that have collateral backing,” said Georg Grodzki , head of credit research at Legal & General Investment Management in London. The company, which oversees almost 300 billion pounds ($439 billion), is a “selective buyer” of covered bonds, favoring notes sold by northern European issuers, he said. Yields have risen at a slower pace relative to government securities than corporate debt. Spreads on euro-denominated covered bonds have widened 9 basis points to 153 basis points since May 6, compared with an increase of 28 basis points to 196 for company debt, Bank of America Merrill Lynch indexes show. Company Bond Sales The increase in covered bond sales contrasts with a decline in corporate debt issuance to $70 billion last month, less than half April’s tally and the least since 2003, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. Elsewhere in credit markets, BP Plc bonds rose the most since March 2009, rebounding from a record low, as investors assessed liabilities stemming from the worst oil spill in U.S. history. The 4.75 percent notes due in 2019, issued by the company’s finance unit, increased 2.7 cents to 92.9 cents on the dollar as of 12:28 p.m. in New York, according to Trace, the bond price reporting system of the Financial Industry regulatory Authority. The debt fell to 90.1 cents yesterday, the lowest ever. BP bonds had fallen as the London-based company’s efforts to plug its gushing well failed and the U.S. Justice Department said it’s investigating whether any criminal or civil laws were violated. The leak began after an April 20 explosion aboard the Deepwater Horizon rig, which BP leased from Vernier, Switzerland-based Transocean Ltd. BP Rating Cut “Investors are starting to get their hands around the potential exposures the spill companies may have,” said Joel Levington , managing director of corporate credit at Brookfield Investment Management Inc. in New York. BP’s credit ranking was cut one step to Aa2 by Moody’s Investors Service and is on review another possible downgrade, the New York-based rating company said today in a statement. Fitch Ratings cut BP’s ranking one notch to AA from AA+. A gauge of U.S. corporate credit risk fell for a second day as factory orders rose and the service industry expanded in May for a fifth straight month. The Markit CDX North America Investment Grade Index Series 14, which investors use to hedge against losses on corporate debt or to speculate on creditworthiness, dropped 0.3 basis point to a mid-price of 117.1 basis points as of 12:01 p.m. in New York, according to Markit Group Ltd. The index typically falls as investor confidence improves and rises as it deteriorates. European Risk Falls The cost of insuring against non-payment on European corporate bonds fell the most in a week today, according to traders of credit-default swaps, while indexes in Asia also declined. The rally in credit coincided with gains in Europe and Asia stock markets, with the DJ Stoxx 600 Europe index rising 1.4 percent. Default swaps on the Markit iTraxx Crossover Index of 50 mostly high-yield European companies fell 24.4 basis points to a two-week low of 558.8, according to Markit data. The decline signals an improvement in investor perceptions of credit quality. Credit-default swaps on European sovereign notes snapped three days of increases, with contracts tied to Italy dropping 10 basis points to 223, declining from a record, according to CMA DataVision. Default swaps linked to Greece’s government bonds fell 21 basis points to 717, Spain dropped 12 basis points to 238 and Portugal was 15 basis points lower at 330, CMA prices show. SovX Europe Index The Markit iTraxx SovX Western Europe Index of credit- default swaps linked to debt of 15 governments fell to 147 basis points, from yesterday’s all-time high closing price of 154.5, according to CMA. Credit-default swaps on BP’s debt were 13 basis points lower at 246. In emerging markets, spreads narrowed 7 basis points on average to 307, according to JPMorgan Chase & Co.’s Emerging Market Bond index. Argentina’s new 2017 bonds sank in their first day of trading as the government began turning over the securities to investors as part of its restructuring of $18.3 billion of defaulted debt kept out of a 2005 settlement. The 8.75 percent notes tumbled to 80.85 cents on the dollar from their issue price of 90.11, Stone Harbor Investment Partners said. Argentina began issuing $738 million of the bonds yesterday to institutional investors who participated in an early tender period. The government is distributing the securities as compensation for past due interest. “Argentina came up with an issuance price which isn’t really in line with reality,” said Jim Craige , who helps manage $12 billion of emerging-market debt, including defaulted Argentine bonds, at Stone Harbor in New York. Covered Bond Sales Bank of Montreal yesterday sold U.S. dollar-denominated covered bonds in the first transaction in the currency in more than a month. BNP Paribas Home Loan Covered Bond SA, a unit of France’s largest bank, sold 1.5 billion euros ($1.8 billion) of five-year notes that yielded 42 basis points more than the swap rate, Bloomberg data show. Dexia SA in Brussels sold 500 million euros of 10-year bonds with a 15 basis-point spread. Bank of New Zealand , a unit of National Australia Bank Ltd., is meeting with investors this week before a possible sale of covered bonds, according to a person familiar with the plan. The lender has completed the documentation it needs to sell the covered notes, the person said, asking not to be named as the plans are private. A sale would be the first issue of such securities in New Zealand. ‘Flight to Safety’ “Investors are buying covered bonds rather than unsecured notes as a flight to safety,” said Florian Hillenbrand , a Munich-based senior analyst at UniCredit SpA, Italy’s biggest bank. Banks are “tapping the market now because it’s a nice window of opportunity and investors have money to put to work,” said Hillenbrand, who recommends buying German, French and Scandinavian covered bonds. Jose Sarafana , the Paris-based head of covered bond strategy at Societe Generale SA, said he expects another 60 billion euros of sales this year. “Covered bonds offer safer, more liquid assets than senior unsecured notes and therefore we’re seeing plenty of demand for new issues,” he said. Issues in the $2.9 trillion covered bond market get higher ratings than regular notes because they are backed by a pool of assets that can be sold in a default. The extra security typically allows lenders to pay less interest. Covered bonds, which date back to the 18th century, are mostly sold by banks and tend to originate from Europe. Lenders in the region are facing 195 billion euros of bad debts by the end of 2011 as governments cut spending to reduce budget deficits, the European Central Bank estimates. “Bond issuance was very low in May, so we’re now seeing banks looking to covered bonds to meet their growing refinancing needs,” said SocGen’s Sarafana. Borrowers are rushing to sell debt before the ECB’s year- long purchase program ends on June 30. The Frankfurt-based ECB said yesterday it has spent 55.1 billion euros of the 60 billion it set aside a year ago to support credit markets by buying covered bonds. To contact the reporters on this story: Sonja Cheung in London scheung58@bloomberg.net ; Caroline Hyde in London chyde3@bloomberg.net

Read the full article →

Euro Gains Most Since September Amid Traders Exiting Bets on Its Decline

May 22, 2010

By Ben Levisohn May 22 (Bloomberg) — The euro rose the most in eight months against the dollar amid speculation traders who bet on its decline amid Europe’s sovereign-debt crisis had to buy back the currency as it strengthened to a one-week high. Europe’s common currency fell on May 19 to its weakest level in four years a day after Germany banned naked short sales, adding to concern that the region’s leadership may not be able to contain the crisis. The yen gained against all of its 16 major counterparts as the MSCI World Index of shares traded near the lowest since August and the Reuters/Jefferies CRB Index of 19 raw materials fell for a fourth straight week. The greenback fell versus the yen ahead of a report next week that may show U.S. durable goods orders rose in April. “There’s been a massive short covering,” said Andrew Busch , a global currency strategist at Bank of Montreal in Chicago. “The euro was already stabilizing this week when Germany came in and changed the rules of the game in the middle of the day by banning short sales and created additional uncertainty. The much stronger euro at the end of the week shows you how short people were. A tremendous amount of risk has been taken off the table.” The euro climbed 1.7 percent, the largest five-day gain since September, to $1.2570 from $1.2358 on May 14. It fell to $1.2144 on May 19, the lowest level since April 2006, before rebounding yesterday to as much as $1.2672, the highest since May 13. The shared currency dropped 1.1 percent to 113.13 yen, its fourth consecutive decline, from 114.38. The greenback decreased 2.7 percent, the largest decline since February, to 90 yen, from 92.47. Durable Goods U.S. durable goods orders gained 1.5 percent last month, according to the median forecast in a Bloomberg survey. The Commerce Department’s report is scheduled to be released on May 26 in Washington D.C. Australia’s dollar this week plummeted 8.5 percent to 74.92 yen and South Africa’s rand dropped 6.5 percent to 11.46 yen as volatility rose to its highest level in more than a year, sapping demand for carry trades, in which investors buy higher- yielding assets with amounts borrowed in nations with low interest rates. Japan’s benchmark of 0.1 percent, less than the 4.5 percent benchmark rate in Australia and 6.5 percent in South Africa, has made the yen popular for funding such transactions. ‘Having a Re-Think’ “People are looking at the volatility levels, and having a re-think whether they want to keep that much risk on the table,” said Aroop Chatterjee , a currency strategist at Barclays Capital Inc. in New York. “Risk reduction continues to be the focus.” JPMorgan Chase & Co.’s implied-volatility index for six major currencies versus the dollar climbed to as high as 16.95 percent on May 20, the most since April 2009. Increased volatility erodes the profit of carry trades. German lawmakers approved their country’s share of a $1 trillion euro-region bailout in a vote yesterday, allaying market concern that they would balk at approving a second emergency aid package in as many weeks. German financial regulator BaFin on May 18 prohibited naked short-selling and speculating on European government bonds with credit-default swaps in an effort to calm the region’s financial markets, sparking investor anxiety about a lack of coordination among European policy makers. The ban, which took effect on May 19 and lasts until March 31, 2011, also applies to the shares of 10 German banks and insurers, BaFin said in an e-mailed statement. The step was needed because of “exceptional volatility” in euro-area bonds, BaFin said. ‘Puzzled Many’ Dutch Finance Minister Jan Kees de Jager yesterday said Germany’s unilateral move to ban some types of short-selling was “not wise” and a coordinated approach would be better, defying a call for a similar ban in the Netherlands. The German move “puzzled many investors, as isolated policy moves in financial markets invite regulatory arbitrage,” Steven Englander , head of Group of 10 currency strategy in New York at Citigroup in New York wrote in a report yesterday. “The confusion surrounding the moves, their extent and their cohesiveness remains one of the largest sources of uncertainty in asset markets.” The Swiss franc this week fell 3.2 percent, the first drop in four weeks, to 1.4449 per euro, prompting speculation that the Swiss National Bank had entered the market to weaken the currency. ‘Elevated Threat’ “From the price action, it looks like there was some sort of official action,” Neil Jones , head of European hedge-fund sales at Mizuho Corporate Bank Ltd. said on May 19. Central bank spokesman Nicolas Haymoz declined to comment. The euro rose against the dollar as speculation the Swiss central bank sought to weaken the franc drove traders to cover short positions on concern that the European Central Bank may intervene on the behalf of the shared currency. On May 18, bets by hedge funds and other large speculators on a decline in the euro were 107,143 contracts more than those anticipating a gain, according to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, near a record 113,890 contracts reached the prior week. There is an “elevated threat” the central banks of Europe, the U.S. and Japan will intervene in currency markets though the threshold has not yet been reached, according to Morgan Stanley. ‘Warning Signals’ The chance of joint intervention by the Group of Three has increased to 30 percent, above the long-term average of 12 percent, Sophia Drossos , co-head of global foreign-exchange strategy at the U.S. investment bank, wrote in a note to clients. The probability is based on a model that takes into account factors such exchange-rate momentum and market positioning. “The strongest warning signals in our model have been coming from the pace of euro decline rather than the direction of the move itself,” New York-based Drossos wrote in a note yesterday. “Other indicators in our model suggest euro weakness does not appear out of line with fundamentals or policy preferences.” To contact the reporter on this story: Ben Levisohn in New York at blevisohn@bloomberg.net .

Read the full article →

Euro Gains Most Since September Amid Traders Exiting Bets on Its Decline

May 22, 2010

By Ben Levisohn May 22 (Bloomberg) — The euro rose the most in eight months against the dollar amid speculation traders who bet on its decline amid Europe’s sovereign-debt crisis had to buy back the currency as it strengthened to a one-week high. Europe’s common currency fell on May 19 to its weakest level in four years a day after Germany banned naked short sales, adding to concern that the region’s leadership may not be able to contain the crisis. The yen gained against all of its 16 major counterparts as the MSCI World Index of shares traded near the lowest since August and the Reuters/Jefferies CRB Index of 19 raw materials fell for a fourth straight week. The greenback fell versus the yen ahead of a report next week that may show U.S. durable goods orders rose in April. “There’s been a massive short covering,” said Andrew Busch , a global currency strategist at Bank of Montreal in Chicago. “The euro was already stabilizing this week when Germany came in and changed the rules of the game in the middle of the day by banning short sales and created additional uncertainty. The much stronger euro at the end of the week shows you how short people were. A tremendous amount of risk has been taken off the table.” The euro climbed 1.7 percent, the largest five-day gain since September, to $1.2570 from $1.2358 on May 14. It fell to $1.2144 on May 19, the lowest level since April 2006, before rebounding yesterday to as much as $1.2672, the highest since May 13. The shared currency dropped 1.1 percent to 113.13 yen, its fourth consecutive decline, from 114.38. The greenback decreased 2.7 percent, the largest decline since February, to 90 yen, from 92.47. Durable Goods U.S. durable goods orders gained 1.5 percent last month, according to the median forecast in a Bloomberg survey. The Commerce Department’s report is scheduled to be released on May 26 in Washington D.C. Australia’s dollar this week plummeted 8.5 percent to 74.92 yen and South Africa’s rand dropped 6.5 percent to 11.46 yen as volatility rose to its highest level in more than a year, sapping demand for carry trades, in which investors buy higher- yielding assets with amounts borrowed in nations with low interest rates. Japan’s benchmark of 0.1 percent, less than the 4.5 percent benchmark rate in Australia and 6.5 percent in South Africa, has made the yen popular for funding such transactions. ‘Having a Re-Think’ “People are looking at the volatility levels, and having a re-think whether they want to keep that much risk on the table,” said Aroop Chatterjee , a currency strategist at Barclays Capital Inc. in New York. “Risk reduction continues to be the focus.” JPMorgan Chase & Co.’s implied-volatility index for six major currencies versus the dollar climbed to as high as 16.95 percent on May 20, the most since April 2009. Increased volatility erodes the profit of carry trades. German lawmakers approved their country’s share of a $1 trillion euro-region bailout in a vote yesterday, allaying market concern that they would balk at approving a second emergency aid package in as many weeks. German financial regulator BaFin on May 18 prohibited naked short-selling and speculating on European government bonds with credit-default swaps in an effort to calm the region’s financial markets, sparking investor anxiety about a lack of coordination among European policy makers. The ban, which took effect on May 19 and lasts until March 31, 2011, also applies to the shares of 10 German banks and insurers, BaFin said in an e-mailed statement. The step was needed because of “exceptional volatility” in euro-area bonds, BaFin said. ‘Puzzled Many’ Dutch Finance Minister Jan Kees de Jager yesterday said Germany’s unilateral move to ban some types of short-selling was “not wise” and a coordinated approach would be better, defying a call for a similar ban in the Netherlands. The German move “puzzled many investors, as isolated policy moves in financial markets invite regulatory arbitrage,” Steven Englander , head of Group of 10 currency strategy in New York at Citigroup in New York wrote in a report yesterday. “The confusion surrounding the moves, their extent and their cohesiveness remains one of the largest sources of uncertainty in asset markets.” The Swiss franc this week fell 3.2 percent, the first drop in four weeks, to 1.4449 per euro, prompting speculation that the Swiss National Bank had entered the market to weaken the currency. ‘Elevated Threat’ “From the price action, it looks like there was some sort of official action,” Neil Jones , head of European hedge-fund sales at Mizuho Corporate Bank Ltd. said on May 19. Central bank spokesman Nicolas Haymoz declined to comment. The euro rose against the dollar as speculation the Swiss central bank sought to weaken the franc drove traders to cover short positions on concern that the European Central Bank may intervene on the behalf of the shared currency. On May 18, bets by hedge funds and other large speculators on a decline in the euro were 107,143 contracts more than those anticipating a gain, according to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, near a record 113,890 contracts reached the prior week. There is an “elevated threat” the central banks of Europe, the U.S. and Japan will intervene in currency markets though the threshold has not yet been reached, according to Morgan Stanley. ‘Warning Signals’ The chance of joint intervention by the Group of Three has increased to 30 percent, above the long-term average of 12 percent, Sophia Drossos , co-head of global foreign-exchange strategy at the U.S. investment bank, wrote in a note to clients. The probability is based on a model that takes into account factors such exchange-rate momentum and market positioning. “The strongest warning signals in our model have been coming from the pace of euro decline rather than the direction of the move itself,” New York-based Drossos wrote in a note yesterday. “Other indicators in our model suggest euro weakness does not appear out of line with fundamentals or policy preferences.” To contact the reporter on this story: Ben Levisohn in New York at blevisohn@bloomberg.net .

Read the full article →

Dan Solin: Madoff Victims to Hedge Funds: Show Us the Money!

May 18, 2010

In a recent blog , I gave this definition of hedge funds: “A way for fund managers to make unbelievable profits by convincing wealthy investors, pensions and trusts they have discovered a way to achieve high returns without commensurate risk. Qualifies as one of the greatest wealth transfer vehicles in modern times.” I was being too kind. Pre-Madoff, hedge funds were all the rage. These were the captains of Wall Street. They had figured out a way to make money in any market. Trillions of dollars flowed into their coffers. The hedge fund managers became the rock stars of the financial world. What a difference a big fraud makes. Now many of these funds claim they were also victims of Madoff. They want you to believe they were clueless about his machinations. That’s the justification for keeping their obscene fees for advising their clients to invest with him. The investors are wiped out. The hedge funds and banks are swimming in cash. Any wonder why investors have lost confidence in the financial system? Take Ivy Asset Management for example. This is no rinky dink operation. It is wholly owned by the Bank of New York Mellon. According to a Complaint filed by New York Attorney General Andrew M. Cuomo, (the allegations of the complaint have yet to be proven), filed in the New York State Supreme Court, Ivy scored $40 million in fees (!) by placing over $227 million of its clients’ funds with Madoff. How difficult would it have been for the Wharton and Harvard trained M.B.A’s at Ivy and other hedge funds and banks to figure out Madoff was a fraud? They were handsomely paid to perform due diligence. Cuomo alleges Ivy knew, or should have known, there weren’t enough options traded to support Madoff’s much touted “split strike conversion” strategy. A press release issued by the Attorney General references a memorandum, written in 2002, by Ivy’s Chief Investment Officer, Howard Wohl. Mr. Wohl wrote this to a subordinate who could not figure out Madoff’s sterling performance record: “Ah, Madoff, You omitted one possibility – he’s a fraud!” It’s ironic that Ivy and the other hedge funds and banks who promoted Madoff can defend these lawsuits with the interest on their fees. They have lawyered up with the finest legal minds in the country, with one goal in mind: Hanging on to their ill-gotten fees and not making restitution to the clients who were harmed by their negligence. Predictably, the lawyers (with help from Congress and the courts) are doing a fine job. One court dismissed claims against Union Bancaire Privee Asset Management and its Swiss parent Union Bancaire Privee. These firms created 11 “fund of funds” that lost over $700 million by investing with Madoff. This distinguished Swiss Bank has over $60 billion under management. According to a report on its web site “it is one of the biggest wealth-management banks in private hands.” Its real expertise is doing due diligence on hedge funds. Here’s what it states : “Research and hedge-fund selection are all driven by a due diligence process which is divided into three main strata of risk analysis: qualitative, quantitative and structural risk. This process has been developed with one of the best experts in the auditing world and allows us to make an extremely strict selection of asset managers. The process of due diligence enables us to establish a list of recommended funds that we consider to be the elite of the industry. This list is updated every month and forms the basis of our portfolio recommendations.” Wow. That’s so impressive! You have to wonder how all these experts couldn’t figure out that Bernie was running a primitive Ponzi scheme. Did the distinguished Board of Directors of Union Bancaire decide to do the right thing and make investors whole? After all, their sterling “due diligence” utterly failed. No way. They hired world class lawyers and got the investors’ claims tossed out. In a decision by U.S. District Court Judge Thomas P. Greisa in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Barron v. Igolnikov, 09-Civ. 4471), the Court found the lawsuit was preempted by the Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act (“SLUSA”), a statute that places severe limitations on certain class actions. Judge Greisa found SLUSA applicable even though it applies only to purchases of “covered securities”, which are defined generally as being securities sold on national exchanges. Hedge funds invest in “covered securities”, but are not “covered securities” themselves. At least one other Court disagrees. In a case in the same Court (Pension Comm. of the Univ. of Montreal Pension Plan v. Banc of Am. Sec., LLC, 05 Civ. 9016), Judge Shira A. Scheindlin held that SLUSA did not apply to investments in hedge funds because “…to hold otherwise would extend the reach of SLUSA to any investment vehicle with covered securities in its portfolio.” But I digress. Simply stated, and regardless of legal technicalities, all hedge funds and banks who recommended investments in Madoff should be required to make good on the losses. Since private parties are having difficulty achieving this result, the public sector should take action. The Attorneys General in each state should follow Cuomo’s lead. State Securities Commissioners should emulate the aggressiveness of Massachusetts Secretary of the Commonwealth, William Galvin, who entered into a Consent Order with another Madoff “feeder fund”, Fairfield Greenwich Advisors, and obtained restitution for residents of Massachusetts. The SEC, FINRA and banking regulators have all been reluctant to force disgorgement of fees and reimbursement of losses for entities under their jurisdiction. It’s time to say “enough.” Madoff investors relied on these purported financial gurus. The burden of the losses should fall on those who held themselves out as financial experts with extensive due diligence expertise. Not on individual investors who suffered the losses. Show Madoff investors the money! The views set forth in this blog are the opinions of the author alone and may not represent the views of any firm or entity with whom he is affiliated. The data, information, and content on this blog are for information, education, and non-commercial purposes only. Returns from index funds do not represent the performance of any investment advisory firm. The information on this blog does not involve the rendering of personalized investment advice and is limited to the dissemination of opinions on investing. No reader should construe these opinions as an offer of advisory services. Readers who require investment advice should retain the services of a competent investment professional. The information on this blog is not an offer to buy or sell, or a solicitation of any offer to buy or sell any securities or class of securities mentioned herein. Furthermore, the information on this blog should not be construed as an offer of advisory services. Please note that the author does not recommend specific securities nor is he responsible for comments made by persons posting on this blog. .

Read the full article →

Payrolls in U.S. Rise by Most in Four Years as Jobless Rate Climbs to 9.9%

May 8, 2010

By Timothy R. Homan May 8 (Bloomberg) — Payrolls in the U.S. surged in April by the most in four years, led by gains in private employment that signal the economy is less dependent on government support. The 290,000 increase in employment exceeded the median estimate of economists surveyed by Bloomberg News and followed a 230,000 gain in March that was larger than initially estimated. The jobless rate rose to 9.9 percent from 9.7 percent as thousands of jobseekers entered the workforce, a Labor Department report in Washington showed yesterday. Private employers added 231,000 workers across the economy, from manufacturing to construction to services. General Electric Co. and Berkshire Hathaway Inc. are among companies adding staff in response to growing sales, indicating gains in consumer spending may spur more hiring. “Economic growth is translating into a pickup in the labor market which makes the recovery more self-sustaining,” said James O’Sullivan , global chief economist at MF Global Ltd. in New York. “The strong upward momentum in the data through April should help absorb whatever drag comes from the turmoil in Europe.” Financial markets worldwide were rattled this week on mounting concern European leaders won’t do enough to contain a fiscal crisis in Greece that threatens to engulf Portugal and Spain. The Dow Jones Industrial Average dropped 1.3 percent yesterday in New York, the fourth straight decline. The Standard & Poor’s 500 Index fell 1.5 percent. Yesterday’s Labor Department report showed factory payrolls increased 44,000 in April, the biggest gain since August 1998, while service providers added 225,000 workers, the most since November 2006. Employment at builders increased for a second month. Numbers ‘Heartening’ “These numbers are particularly heartening when you consider where we were a year ago, with an economy in freefall,” President Barack Obama said yesterday. Still, “it’s going to take time to repair and rebuild” the damage from the recession and the financial crisis, he said at the White House. GE, the world’s largest maker of jet engines, power- generation equipment and locomotives, increased the number of jobs it plans to add in Michigan to more than 1,300 with the creation of about 220 aerospace manufacturing positions, the Fairfield, Connecticut-based company said this week. Overall payrolls were forecast to increase by 190,000 after a previously reported March gain of 162,000, according to the median estimate of 84 economists surveyed by Bloomberg. The April gain included 66,000 temporary workers hired by the government to help conduct the 2010 census and a 231,000 rise in private payrolls. Coming Months “The hiring process has begun in the U.S.,” said Stefane Marion , chief economist at National Bank Financial Inc. in Montreal, who forecast a payrolls gain of 280,000. “We expect job creation to continue in the coming months.” The unemployment rate may remain elevated as more people enter the labor force in search of work, one reason why the Federal Reserve is likely to keep its benchmark interest rate at a record low. The jobless rate was projected to hold at 9.7 percent. The labor force grew 805,000 in April and employment increased 550,000, the Labor Department’s survey of households showed. The gain in private payrolls was the fourth straight and followed a 174,000 increase in March that may have reflected, in part, a weather-related rebound from the prior month. Private employment was projected to climb by 100,000, according to the median forecast. Federal government payrolls increased by 65,000 in April, while state and local governments reduced employment by 6,000. Underemployment Climbs The so-called underemployment rate — which includes part- time workers who’d prefer a full-time position and people who want work but have given up looking — increased to 17.1 percent from 16.9 percent. The report also showed an increase in long-term unemployed Americans. The number of people unemployed for 27 weeks or more rose as a percentage of all jobless, to a record 45.9 percent. Billionaire Warren Buffett , whose Berkshire Hathaway cut more than 20,000 jobs last year, said his Omaha, Nebraska-based company is now adding staff as the economic recovery boosts demand at its industrial units. “We do hire people when we have something for them to do,” Buffett told investors last week in Omaha, Nebraska, where Berkshire held its annual shareholders’ meeting. “We are a net hirer now.” To contact the reporter on this story: Timothy R. Homan in Washington at thoman1@bloomberg.net

Read the full article →

Bank of Montreal, MB Financial Make Acquisitions as Illinois Lenders Fail

April 23, 2010

By Dakin Campbell and Doug Alexander April 23 (Bloomberg) — Bank of Montreal, Canada’s fourth- largest lender, and MB Financial Inc. expanded in the U.S. Midwest by acquiring three of the seven Illinois banks shut down today by regulators. MB Financial, based in Chicago, bought two lenders in its home city: Broadway Bank and New Century Bank. The company has now purchased six failed lenders since last year. Bank of Montreal paid a premium to acquire $3.4 billion in deposits at Rockford, Illinois-based Amcore Bank, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. said in a statement on its Web site. “This is a perfect strategic fit that accelerates our growth strategy and reinforces our already strong position in the U.S. Midwest,” Bank of Montreal Chief Executive Officer William Downe said in a statement. Banks are collapsing amid losses on residential and commercial real estate loans, and the FDIC’s list of “problem” lenders is the longest it’s been since 1992. The FDIC, which insures deposits and acts as receiver for failed banks, had 702 lenders on the list at the end of 2009. FDIC Chairman Sheila Bair said U.S. bank failures in 2010 will “peak toward the end of this year” and fall below the agency’s earlier estimate of more than 140. Bair spoke today in a CNBC television interview. Regulators have shut 57 U.S. banks so far this year. Today’s transactions will cost the FDIC’s deposit insurance fund a total of about $973.9 million. Greg Hernandez , an FDIC spokesman, said the agency may shut down multiple troubled lenders in a region on the same day. The practice of “bundling” helps attract bidders for the failed banks and saves money from the insurance fund, he said. Bank of Montreal Amcore’s 52 branches will become offices of Harris Bank, owned by Bank of Montreal, the Toronto-based lender said today in the statement. Downe, 58, has said he’s been looking to expand Chicago-based Harris Bank by increasing business lending, growing from within and making “small and medium-sized” takeovers if they make sense. MB Financial, with $10.9 billion in assets, added more than $1.6 billion in deposits with its two purchases. One of its acquired lenders, Broadway Bank, is a community bank owned by the family of U.S. Senate candidate Alexi Giannoulias , the Democratic nominee seeking the job once held by President Barack Obama in Illinois. Wheaton Bank & Trust agreed to assume the $438.5 million in deposits held by failed lender Wheatland Bank of Naperville, Illinois, the FDIC said . Northbrook Bank and Trust Co. will take over $171.5 million in deposits from Lincoln Park Savings Bank, based in Chicago. First Midwest Bank in Itasca, Illinois, will assume $127 million in deposits from Peotone Bank and Trust Co., the FDIC said. Republic Bank of Chicago bought Citizens Bank & Trust Co. of Chicago, picking up $74.5 million in deposits. To contact the reporters on this story: Dakin Campbell in San Francisco at dcampbell27@bloomberg.net ; Doug Alexander in Toronto at dalexander3@bloomberg.net .

Read the full article →

BCE Will Sell More Assets to Fund IPhone, Fiber-Network Upgrades, CFO Says

April 14, 2010

By Hugo Miller April 14 (Bloomberg) — BCE Inc. Chief Financial Officer Siim Vanaselja plans to sell venture-capital investments and assets partly to raise money for network upgrades that can help ease the strain from devices like Apple Inc.’s iPhone. The assets are worth “a few hundred million dollars,” Vanaselja said in an interview yesterday in Toronto. He didn’t give a time frame for the sales. BCE, Canada’s largest phone company by subscribers, first offered the iPhone in November, more than a year after rival Rogers Communications Inc. BCE will put some of the money into overhauling its fiber network, said Vanaselja, 53, who has overseen the carrier’s finances for almost a decade. BCE rolled out a new network in November to support the iPhone. While the device uses twice the network capacity of a typical smartphone, according to Sanford C. Bernstein & Co., it also generates more revenue.      “The market is rewarding them for being more aggressive for ploughing more money into capital spending,” said Maher Yaghi , an analyst at Desjardins Securities in Montreal. He rates the shares “hold” and doesn’t own any.      BCE, which had climbed 15 percent in the past year before today, fell 9 cents to C$29.43 at 1:07 p.m. in Toronto Stock Exchange trading. BCE still faces the challenge from four new wireless carriers this year and lags behind Rogers and Telus Corp. in smartphone adoption, said Dvai Ghose , an analyst at Genuity Capital Markets. He also has a “hold” rating on BCE stock and doesn’t own it himself. The company had gained 1.8 percent this year before today, less than the 3.9 percent gain for Toronto-based Rogers, Canada’s biggest wireless carrier, and Telus’ 9.8 percent advance. Asset Sales BCE’s 15 percent stake in CTVglobemedia Inc. the publisher of The Globe and Mail newspaper and CTV television network, may be among those put up for sale, said Ghose, who is based in Toronto. He estimated it might fetch about C$150 million ($150 million). Mark Langton , a spokesman for BCE, said the company is “happy with its investment in CTVglobemedia.” CTV spokeswoman Bonnie Brownlee declined to comment. BCE, based in Montreal, said this month it sold its stake in satellite-services company SkyTerra Communications Inc. for C$111 million. Its C$110 million holding in Clearwire Corp. was sold in December. The carrier is focusing on the wireless business, its most profitable with C$1.28 billion in earnings last year . “By and large I think we’ve achieved our objective of eliminating the holding company, conglomerate structure of what BCE has been,” said Vanaselja. What remains are “isolated niche parts of the business that have been around for many years and just aren’t part of the core and just aren’t profitable.” Dividend Growth Assets still to be sold include venture-capital investments, some businesses and potentially real estate, Vanaselja said. He declined to be more specific. While it’s too early to say whether the company will raise its dividend again this year, returning cash to shareholders is a priority for BCE, Vanaselja said. The company boosted its annual dividend to C$1.74 a share in December. It has the fifth- highest dividend yield of the 178 companies on the S&P/TSX Equity Index, according to Bloomberg data . “A clear component of our capital market strategy is to look to sustainable increases in our dividend,” Vanaselja said. “That word sustainable is critically important.” To contact the reporter on this story: Hugo Miller in Toronto at hugomiller@bloomberg.net

Read the full article →

Peso Ascends With Loonie as Hedge Funds Favor Nafta Currencies as Best Bet

April 4, 2010

By Chris Fournier and Ye Xie April 5 (Bloomberg) — Mexico’s peso and Canada’s dollar are outperforming all other major currencies for the first time since at least 1998 and probably will keep rallying as the U.S. recovery lifts the rest of the world’s largest trading bloc. The currencies gained 5.9 percent and 3.7 percent against the greenback in 2010’s opening months, rising in tandem with the Intercontinental Exchange Inc.’s Dollar Index for a second straight quarter for the first time in 11 years. Hedge funds and large speculators are the most bullish on the peso and Canada’s loonie since at least April 2008, before the credit crisis swamped Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. five months later, driving both down as much as 31 percent. As U.S. stimulus efforts totaling as much as $8.2 trillion lift demand for Mexican engine parts from Alfa SAB in Monterrey and Canadian oil from Suncor Energy Inc. in Alberta, the strength of all three countries’ currencies is demonstrating the North American Free Trade Agreement’s benefits. By contrast, ballooning deficits in Greece, Spain and Portugal weighed on the currency of the world’s biggest monetary union as the euro fell 5.7 percent versus the dollar in the first quarter. “With U.S. growth resumption, we should see channels of support for the Canadian dollar and Mexican peso assert themselves,” said Sacha Tihanyi , a strategist in Toronto at Bank of Nova Scotia, one of the first quarter’s three most- accurate forecasters on Canada’s currency in a Bloomberg survey. “Trade unions do have an implicit advantage: Each constituent nation can still tailor monetary policy to their specific situation, given that their economic structures may be quite different, whereas a currency-union is bound by a constant policy,” Tihanyi said. Most Since ‘77 The peso and the loonie topped all 13 other most traded currencies tracked by Bloomberg in January, February and March. The duo and the Dollar Index gained an average of 4.5 percent in the first quarter, the most since 1977. Last year, the greenback fell 14.9 percent in nine months against the euro, yen, pound, Swiss franc, loonie and Swedish krona, the Dollar Index’s fastest decline since 1987. Mexico’s currency will rise another 2.5 percent to 12 per dollar by Dec. 31, from last week’s 12.3026 close, according to Royal Bank of Scotland Group Plc, the first quarter’s most accurate peso forecaster along with Royal Bank of Canada, which sees it strengthening 4.7 percent to 11.75 in a year. The loonie, nicknamed for the aquatic bird on Canada’s C$1 coin, will gain 1.1 percent to reach parity with the U.S. dollar for the first time since July 2008, and then appreciate 3 Canadian cents more by Dec. 31, according to Standard Bank and Scotia, two of the first quarter’s three top forecasters on the currency. It closed last week at C$1.0111. Risk Appetite Alan Wilde , head of fixed-income and currencies in London for a unit of Baring Asset Management, said the peso and loonie will continue rising because Mexico’s currency looks inexpensive and Canada’s tends to appreciate as risk appetite improves. “If you have a flexible policy to allow your currency to drift lower on its own, then you can benefit in an economic downturn because your goods trade cheaply,” said Wilde, whose firm oversees $45 billion. “Greece doesn’t have the policy option to use the currency as some sort of stimulus as Mexico and Canada did during the financial crisis.” The U.S. and Canada enlarged an existing free-trade deal to include Mexico in 1994. Two years earlier, the Maastricht Treaty created the European Union, clearing the way for the 1999 debut of the euro, which is shared by 16 countries. Trade Triples Trade among Nafta’s 444 million people amounts to $2.6 billion a day, triple 1994’s level, and the zone generates a combined annual output of about $17 trillion, according to a Web site run by Nafta members. Output in the euro region, home to 330 million people, totals $13.6 trillion. Consumer spending in the U.S. rose in February for a fifth month and retail sales grew 0.3 percent, the most since November. Payrolls rose by 162,000 workers last month, the most since March 2007, the Labor Department said. The world’s largest economy consumes four-fifths of Mexico’s exports and three- quarters of Canada’s. The three economies will grow 3 percent or more this year, almost three times as fast as the euro region. Nafta “is recognized around the world as a success,” said John Manley , head of the Canadian Council of Chief Executives and the country’s former finance minister. “Nafta has been a source of strength for the North American economies from the moment it went into effect in 1994. Bear in mind that Canada, the United States and Mexico don’t just sell goods and services to one another. We make things together and sell them to the rest of the world.” Nafta’s Downside Critics of the agreement in Congress led by Representative Gene Taylor , a Mississippi Democrat, introduced a bill in February to repeal it, citing a 29 percent decline in U.S. manufacturing employment since 1993. Prior to Nafta, the U.S. benefited from a $1.7 billion trade surplus with Mexico, according to a statement accompanying the legislation. By 2007, Mexican exporters sold the U.S. $75 billion more worth of goods than American companies shipped south of the border. Before being elected president, Barack Obama voiced support for renegotiating the agreement. Not everyone is convinced the loonie and peso will keep gaining. Median Bloomberg survey forecasts see the loonie falling 3.7 percent by Dec. 31 and the peso gaining no more than 0.4 percent against the dollar as Federal Reserve interest-rate increases make the greenback more attractive. The last two times the peso and loonie simultaneously rose in consecutive quarters, in 2004 and 1999, both weakened in the next three months. ‘Less Enthusiastic’ Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce, the nation’s fifth largest lender, sees them weaker at the end of 2010 as the world’s recovery falters. “Slowing global growth makes investors less enthusiastic about commodities currencies,” said Avery Shenfeld , CIBC’s Toronto-based chief economist. Danske Bank, the other top loonie forecaster in the first quarter, sees Canada’s dollar weakening 5.5 percent to C$1.07 by the end of this year. Sixteen years ago, Canada had the highest debt-to-output ratio among Group of Seven countries after Italy. Moody’s Investors Service cut Canada’s Aaa rating in 1994. The following year, then-Prime Minister Jean Chretien’s Liberal Party of Canada imposed austerity measures that led to 11 straight budget surpluses and reinstatement of the country’s Aaa rating in May 2002. Since then, the loonie has appreciated more than 50 percent. Opening Competition After the 1994 peso crisis drove the currency down as much as 40 percent in December and sparked the country’s worst recession in half a century, Mexico reduced its current account as a percentage of gross domestic product to 1.5 percent in 2008, from 7 percent in the year of the crisis. “Canada took the tough decisions; Mexico made some too,” said David Watt , senior currency strategist in Toronto at RBC Capital Markets, a unit of Royal Bank of Canada, the nation’s biggest lender. “Those that haven’t are paying now,” he said, referring to countries in Europe with bigger deficits. Mexico and Canada will have budget deficits equal to 2.6 percent and 2.8 percent of their gross domestic product this year, less than the euro zone’s 6.9 percent and the U.K.’s 12.3 percent, according to median economist estimates. Both countries have benefited from the rising price of oil, their largest export. Oil closed last week at $84.87 a barrel, up from below $34 a barrel in December 2008. Canada is the largest exporter of oil to the U.S. and sits on the biggest pool of reserves outside the Middle East. The Mexican government, the world’s seventh-biggest oil producer, gets almost a third of its revenue from crude exports. Bullishness Speculators had 70,296 more bets that the loonie would rise than contracts that profit from it falling as of March 30 and 73,027 more the week before, when the gap was the widest since October 2007, data from the Washington-based Commodity Futures Trading Commission show. The bullish outlook reflects an economy growing faster than analysts forecast, lower budget deficits and a banking system that didn’t need government funds during the financial crisis. Canada is on course to be the first G-7 nation to erase its budget gap following the global recession. Prime Minister Stephen Harper ’s Conservative Party outlined plans last month to narrow the deficit to C$1.8 billion ($1.78 billion) in 2014, from a record C$53.8 billion last year. Sound Financials The economy grew at a 5 percent annualized rate in the fourth quarter, the fastest pace since 2000. The country’s financial system has been the soundest in the world for two consecutive years, according to the Geneva-based World Economic Forum, and Canadian banks lead 12-month gains on the nation’s equity benchmark, the Standard & Poor’s/TSX Composite Index, which is up almost 40 percent in the past year. Shares of Calgary-based Suncor surged 8.6 percent last month after Canada’s largest oil company announced plans to take advantage of higher crude prices by increasing output. The Bank of Nova Scotia last week raised its recommendation on the stock to “outperform.” The peso is riding Mexico’s export-led recovery, said Clyde Wardle , an emerging-market currency strategist at HSBC Holdings Plc in New York. He sees the peso gaining by year-end to 12.25 per dollar. Mexico reported a preliminary trade surplus of $244 million for February, compared with a median prediction of a $5 million deficit. Industrial production in Latin America’s second-largest economy gained 3.6 percent in January, the most since April 2008. Transmissions Alfa , the world’s largest producer of aluminum engine heads, jumped 344 percent in the past 12 months as Mexico’s car production doubled in January from a year earlier and rose more than 50 percent in February. Mexico City-based Grupo Kuo SAB, which makes transmissions for Ford’s Mustang coupe and Chrysler Group LLC’s Dodge Ram pickup, more than tripled over the past year, compared to the benchmark Bolsa stock index’s 70 percent rise. Bullish bets on the peso outnumbered bearish ones by 109,598 on March 30 and by 109,862 a week before, the most since April 2008. The peso is trading 10.6 percent below its average of 11 per dollar in the past decade even after rallying 26.5 percent from its March 2009 low. Bank of America Merrill Lynch estimates it’s undervalued by 10 percent. “We expect a marathon of slow and steady peso appreciation,” said Alberto Boquin , an analyst for the bank in New York, in a March 26 note. “Fundamental undervaluation of the peso should correct over time.” To contact the reporter on this story: Chris Fournier in Montreal at cfournier3@bloomberg.net

Read the full article →

CGI’s Roach Hunting for Financial Services, Government Deals as Cash Grows

March 26, 2010

By Hugo Miller March 26 (Bloomberg) — CGI Group Inc. , Canada’s biggest computer-services provider, is hunting for deals to beef up its financial services and government units as the company’s available cash pile grows to $1.7 billion. “Financial services, as a percent of revenue, they invest more in IT than any other sector,” Chief Executive Officer Michael Roach said in an interview, referring to technology spending. “If I find the right company with the right criteria, it could double me in the U.S. and triple me in a sector.” As competitors bulk up through acquisitions, CGI is seeking its first major deal since 2004, when it paid C$1.1 billion for American Management Systems Inc. CGI, which is based in Montreal, has cash and credit lines of about C$1.75 billion ($1.7 billion) to draw from. In September, Roach told Bloomberg he was willing to spend $2 billion on a deal. He wouldn’t give a time frame then and declined to do so now. CGI’s customers include London-based bank Barclays Plc, Philadelphia-based insurer Cigna Corp., U.S. federal government agencies and state and provincial governments in the U.S. and Canada. The company generated more than half its revenue in Canada last year. “We’re looking for companies in the U.S., Western Europe,” Roach, 58, said yesterday at CGI’s Toronto office. He’s interested in businesses that cater to government, a strategy he called defensive because CGI would capitalize on U.S. stimulus spending. “I’m not driven by time.” Roach declined to name targets or say if any talks are under way. ‘Enviable Position’ The company should take advantage of a strong balance sheet and the surging Canadian dollar to gain the critical mass it needs outside Canada and to compete with International Business Machines Corp ., said Steven Li , an analyst at Raymond James Ltd. in Toronto. “The Canadian dollar and their cash flow puts them in an enviable position to make a decent-sized acquisition,” said Li, who rates the shares “outperform” and doesn’t own any. “There is a window of opportunity here but as a shareholder , you don’t want them to buy any old company. If they have contracts that are problematic, it comes back to haunt you.” The Canadian dollar slipped 0.5 percent to 97.15 U.S. cents at 12:50 p.m. New York time. It has gained 20 percent against the U.S. currency in the past year and 21 percent against the euro. Outside of Canada and the U.S., CGI operates throughout Europe as well as in India and Australia. The company said in January that it had more than C$340 million in cash and C$1.4 billion in unused credit at the end of its last quarter. Primarily Cash “We could do a transformational-type deal and I’m confident we could finance it primarily on cash, on a cash basis, essentially,” given the currency’s strength and low interest rates, said Roach, who joined the company in 1998. He served as chief operating officer for almost four years before being named CEO in 2006. The company posted revenue of C$3.83 billion in fiscal 2009, which ended in September, 13 percent higher than in 2006. Profit more than doubled in that period to C$316 million. CGI fell 24 cents to C$15.41 at 12:50 p.m. in Toronto Stock Exchange trading . The shares had gained 9.9 percent this year before today, compared with a 1.3 percent loss for IBM. CGI isn’t alone in trying to gain ground on IBM, the world’s largest computer-services company. Dell Inc. , the third-biggest personal-computer maker, bought Perot Systems Inc. in November for about $3.9 billion. Round Rock, Texas-based Dell said in February it plans to acquire more computer-services companies. Price Too High “Perot would have been interesting for CGI at the right price but the price Dell paid was too high,” Li said. CGI could be considering information-technology units of larger companies as well as stand-alone businesses, he said. Xerox Corp. , based in Norwalk, Connecticut, completed its purchase of Affiliated Computer Services Inc. for about $6 billion in February to accelerate its focus on computer services amid declining sales of printing equipment. “I don’t feel we’re limited financially about going after a target,” Roach said. “Our ability to integrate something very large has been well established. I’m not put off by the size.” To contact the reporter on this story: Hugo Miller in Toronto at hugomiller@bloomberg.net

Read the full article →

OSI’s Board Rejects Astellas Pharma’s $3.5 Billion Hostile Takeover Offer

March 1, 2010

By Elizabeth Lopatto and Kanoko Matsuyama March 2 (Bloomberg) — OSI Pharmaceuticals Inc. rejected a $52-a-share hostile takeover bid from Astellas Pharma Inc. , Japan’s second-largest drugmaker, as investors anticipated a higher offer and possible bidding war. OSI “is not interested in undertaking a sale” at that price, the Melville, New York-based company said yesterday in a statement responding to Astellas’ $3.5 billion offer. Astellas initiated talks with OSI a more than a year ago, and will nominate directors to OSI’s board to pursue its bid, the Tokyo-based company said yesterday in a statement. The offer follows Astellas’ unsuccessful $1.1 billion bid last year for CV Therapeutics Inc. , which ended when that company agreed to be acquired by Gilead Sciences Inc. for $1.4 billion. Roche Holding AG partners with OSI on Tarceva, its drug for pancreatic and lung cancer, and may emerge as a rival bidder, analysts say. “Companies which have agreements with OSI may appear to be a white knight, just like Gilead appeared when Astellas bid for CV Therapeutics,” said Kenji Masuzoe , a Tokyo-based analyst for Deutsche Bank, in a telephone interview yesterday. Astellas said in its statement that it made “numerous attempts” to negotiate prior to the unsolicited bid, starting with a meeting with OSI Chief Executive Officer Colin Goddard in January 2009 and a written proposal in February that year. OSI surged $19.23, or 52 percent, to $56.25 at 4 p.m. New York time in Nasdaq Stock Market composite trading yesterday. Astellas closed at 3,345 yen in Tokyo trading yesterday, and announced its buyout bid after the Japanese stock market closed. February 12 Meeting Astellas Chief Executive Officer Masafumi Nogimori met with Goddard on Feb. 12, 2010, the Japanese drugmaker said. “This offer follows our attempts over the past 13 months to engage OSI in meaningful discussions,” Nogimori said in the statement. “We firmly believe in the compelling strategic rationale behind the combination.” Goddard briefed his directors after that meeting and the board determined the offer “very significantly undervalues” OSI, the company said in its statement. OSI said it could provide Astellas certain non-public information “which is fundamental to our view of the value of the company.” Kathy Galante , a spokeswoman for OSI, said in a telephone interview today that she couldn’t comment beyond what the company said in its statement. Tarceva Sales OSI’s portion of U.S. Tarceva sales last year was $209 million, and the company also received royalties of $146 million from Basel, Switzerland-based Roche for international sales. The pill is in trials for use earlier in lung cancer, as well as in ovarian and colorectal cancer. OSI’s share of Tarceva revenue and royalties could be transferred to a buyer under the current deal with Roche, according to a Feb. 24 regulatory filing from OSI. Roche spokesman Alexander Klauser declined to comment yesterday. “Roche is the logical” white knight for OSI, said Jason Zhang , an analyst with the Bank of Montreal, in a telephone interview yesterday. “OSI will probably go to Roche and ask for a higher bid.” Announcing its bid may help Astellas close the deal, said Eric Schmidt , an analyst with Cowen & Co., in a note to clients yesterday. “We anticipate Astellas will modestly sweeten its offer in order to complete the transaction on friendly terms,” Schmidt said. Citigroup Inc. is Astellas’s financial adviser, while Morrison & Foerster LLP is providing legal counsel. Astellas said its offer isn’t subject to financing conditions. Debt of $335 Million OSI had debt of about $335 million as of Dec. 31, Galante said in an e-mailed statement yesterday. At that time, the company had cash and investments of about $470 million. She declined to name the financial and legal advisers OSI used to review the Astellas offer. U.S. regulators are considering an application from OSI and Roche to expand use of Tarceva even after it failed to win the backing of an advisory panel, the companies said in January. OSI shares slumped in May after the Tarceva didn’t work as well as expected in lung cancer study. Roche agreed in 2008 to cut the price of Tarceva for the U.K.’s National Health Service, gaining the recommendation of a government agency that advises on the cost-effectiveness of medicines. Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., based in Osaka, is Japan’s biggest drugmaker. To contact the reporters on this story: Elizabeth Lopatto in New York elopatto@bloomberg.net Kanoko Matsuyama in Tokyo at kmatsuyama2@bloomberg.net

Read the full article →

Winter Olympics End in Triumph as Canada Captures Gold Record

March 1, 2010

By Erik Matuszewski, Michael Buteau and Christopher Donville March 1 (Bloomberg) — A Winter Olympics that started with tragedy ended in triumph for Canada. The host nation won 14 gold medals at Vancouver, the most by any country in the 86-year history of the Winter Games. Canada finished with a flurry of 10 gold medals in the final week of the 17-day competition, capped by the most coveted one of all — the men’s ice hockey title. The Vancouver Olympics began with the death of Georgian luger Nodar Kumaritashvili hours before the opening ceremony. They ended when Sidney Crosby scored an overtime goal that gave Canada a 3-2 victory over the U.S. in the host nation’s most popular sport for the final gold medal. “It’s a storybook ending,” said Kristian Arciaga, 20, a political science student at the University of British Columbia, as he celebrated yesterday in downtown Vancouver. Canada fell short of its quest to “Own the Podium” in Vancouver, as the U.S. topped the medal table with a record 37. The hosts did set a national best with 26 medals, and their gold medals topped the previous Winter Olympics record of 13, by Norway in 2002 in Salt Lake City and the Soviet Union in 1976 at Innsbruck, Austria. “We should have called it ‘Own the Gold Podium,’ but we didn’t,” said Chris Rudge , chief executive officer of the Canadian Olympic Committee. “Maybe that is the standard we will move to. We hit it out of the park in that respect.” TV Ratings The gold-medal hockey game may turn out be the most-watched sports program in Canada’s history, said Keith Pelley , president of the CTV-Rogers broadcasting group. The preliminary round meeting between Canada and the U.S. holds the record for a sports event and drew about a third of the population. The record American medal haul translated to ratings success in the U.S., where NBC, a unit of General Electric Co. , projects its most Winter Games viewers since 1994 in Lillehammer, Norway. “Our athletes have done a phenomenal job,” Scott Blackmun , chief executive officer of the U.S. Olympic Committee , said at a Feb. 27 press conference. “Our success here helps us commercially and helps us with broadcasters.” The U.S. topped the Winter Olympic record of 36 medals, set by Germany eight years ago, behind gold-medal performances from athletes such as snowboarder Shaun White and Alpine skiers Lindsey Vonn and Bode Miller . Record Haul Evan Lysacek became the first American to win the men’s figure skating title since 1988; Steve Holcomb helped the U.S. end a 62-year gold medal drought in four-man bobsled; and Bill Demong won the country’s first Olympic title in Nordic combined, an event involving ski jumping and cross-country skiing. “To know this is the biggest medal haul ever is pretty amazing,” said speedskater Apolo Ohno , who became the most decorated U.S. Winter Olympic athlete by winning three medals to push his career total to eight. Germany finished second to the U.S. with 30 medals, including 10 golds. Alpine skier Maria Riesch and biathlete Magdalena Neuner each won two gold medals for Germany, which has finished first or second in total medals at 11 straight Winter Olympics. Kumaritashvili died hours before the opening ceremony on Feb. 12 in a crash during a training run in Whistler, about a two-hour drive north of Vancouver. It was the first death of an athlete at the Olympics in 18 years. Moment of Silence Kumaritashvili was remembered with a moment of silence during the opening ceremony. That evening also brought a problem for the Vancouver organizers, starting days of criticism. One leg of the cauldron that held the Olympic flame didn’t rise from the floor during the ceremony. Organizers also were criticized early in the Winter Games for problems ranging from a leaky ice-cleaning machine that caused delays at the speedskating rink to 28,000 tickets canceled at the snowboard and freestyle-skiing venue on Cypress Mountain because of rain that created unsafe viewing areas for spectators. “The Games began with what I would say were teething pains, but I commend (the Vancouver Organizing Committee) for rapidly correcting that,” Jacques Rogge , president of the International Olympic Committee, said at a news conference yesterday. “From that moment on, things went extremely well.” Fifty-six athletes won multiple medals, led by Norwegian cross-country skier Marit Bjoergen , who captured five, including three golds. She missed a fourth gold medal by three-tenths of a second. Short-track speedskater Wang Meng of China was the only other athlete to win three golds. Norway Gold The most successful male athlete was Norwegian cross- country skier Petter Northug , who won four medals, including two of his country’s nine golds. Norway was fourth with 23 total medals. South Korea, which hadn’t won a gold medal before 1992, took six for the second straight Winter Olympics. The haul was highlighted by Lee Jung-su’s two short-track gold medals and Kim Yu-na’s world-record performance as she became the first South Korean to win an Olympic figure-skating medal. While Austria finished fifth in total medals, its men’s Alpine skiing team failed to reach the podium in any of the five Olympic events for the first time since the sport was introduced to the Winter Games in 1936. Russia, which will host the 2014 Winter Olympics in the Black Sea resort of Sochi, finished with three gold medals, its fewest since first competing in 1956. Ends Drought Three weeks ago, Canada was searching for its first gold medal as a host country, after the Winter Games in Calgary in 1988 and the Montreal Games in 1976. Freestyle skier Alexandre Bilodeau ended the drought on the second day of competition and promised that more gold medals were in store for Canada. When Crosby’s goal ended the Winter Games before a delirious crowd at Canada Hockey Place arena, the final tally was record-setting. “Alexandre, your first gold medal gave us all permission to feel like and behave like champions,” Vancouver Olympics Chief Executive Officer John Furlong said during last night’s closing ceremony, which featured performances by Canadian musicians Neil Young and Nickelback. “And our last one will be remembered for generations.” To contact the reporter on this story: Erik Matuszewski in Vancouver, at matuszewski@bloomberg.net ; Michael Buteau in Vancouver, at mbuteau@bloomberg.net ; Christopher Donville in Vancouver cjdonville@bloomberg.net .

Read the full article →

Canada Brings Home Hockey Gold, Obama Beer in Overtime Match

February 28, 2010

By Gadi Dechter Feb. 28 (Bloomberg) — With an overtime goal by Sidney Crosby , the Canadian men’s hockey team brought home the gold medal — and a case of Molson’s Canadian lager for Canada’s Prime Minister, Stephen Harper , paid for by Barack Obama . The U.S. president and Harper made a “friendly wager” on the gold medal game today that pitted the North American neighbors in the final event of the Vancouver Olympic Games. If the U.S. had defeated the hometown favorites, Harper would have suffered the added ignominy of having to buy Obama a case of Yuengling beer, with headquarters in Pottsville, Pennsylvania, said White House spokesman Nick Shapiro . Canada beat the U.S. 3-2, earning its eighth hockey gold medal. The game was extended after U.S. player Zach Parise scored in the last 24 seconds of regulation play. The last U.S. Olympic title came in 1980, when a group of college players upset the Soviet Union in a semifinal game that became known as the “Miracle on Ice.” The U.S. beat Finland for the gold. Molson Canadian lager is made by Molson Coors Brewing Co ., jointly headquartered in Denver and Montreal. Last year, the company sold its 19.9 percent stake in the Montreal Canadiens professional hockey team to an investment group led by Quebec’s Molson family. D.G. Yuengling & Son, Inc ., which bills itself as “America’s Oldest Brewery,” traces its roots to 1829’s Eagle Brewery in Pottsville, a central Pennsylvania town two hour’s drive from Philadelphia. Shapiro originally said the loser would get the beer. “Sorry, we had it backwards,” Shapiro said in a second e- mailed statement today during the game. “Blame Canada.” To contact the reporters on this story: Gadi Dechter in Washington, D.C. at gdechter@bloomberg.net .

Read the full article →

Flaherty Moves to Tighten Canada Mortgage Industry Rules Amid Bubble Talk

February 16, 2010

By Alexandre Deslongchamps and Theophilos Argitis Feb. 16 (Bloomberg) — Canada’s Finance Minister Jim Flaherty tightened rules in the country’s mortgage industry to ensure buyers can afford their homes when interest rates rise. Under the changes for government-backed mortgages, which take effect April 19, buyers will have to meet standards for five-year, fixed-rate mortgages even if they opt for variable rates. Limits on refinancing will be stricter and people buying a home that they don’t occupy must make a down payment of 20 percent. Flaherty, who reiterated he doesn’t see a housing bubble in Canada, today said the three measures will “moderate” the housing market. Record home prices and sales prompted Stephen Jarislowsky , chairman of Montreal-based investment adviser Jarislowsky Fraser Ltd., to say last week he’s “convinced” there’s a bubble in Canada’s housing market fueled by government measures that encourage consumers to take on debt . Flaherty said the changes will prevent borrowers from building up “unsustainable debt levels” and “help Canadians prepare for higher interest rates in the future.” It’s the second time since taking office in 2006 that Flaherty has taken measures to limit the influx of buyers in the market. The Department of Finance in 2008 said the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corp. would limit amortizations to 35 years and offer loan insurance on 95 percent of the loan value, from 40 years and 100 percent previously. Too Tempting “The risk was becoming a bit too tempting for borrowers to take on mortgages they shouldn’t, when rates are at such exceptionally low levels,” said Avery Shenfeld , chief economist with CIBC World Markets in an interview in Toronto. “This is really addressing people who are coming into the market, often young families, and making sure they’re not taking on debt that they can’t afford.” Canadian home prices and resales will grow to records this year boosted by low interest rates , the Canadian Real Estate Association said in a report last week. The group said last month that sales increased in December to a record 46,805 units on a seasonally adjusted basis, up 72 percent from a year ago. “They have basically encouraged people to buy houses based on cheap mortgages,” Jarislowsky, 84, said in a Feb. 11 telephone interview from Montreal. “That has created the opposite effect of what was desirable.” Stress Tests Bank of Canada Governor Mark Carney said in December consumers and banks should be cautious about adding to household debts because a rise in record-low interest rates to “more normal” levels will leave some borrowers unable to pay. Citing a “stress-test” analysis the central bank did of household finances, Carney said that if interest rates rise faster than bond-market yields indicate, almost one in 10 Canadian households could devote at least 40 percent of their income to paying debts, making them “vulnerable.” The requirement for non-resident owners to make a 20 percent down payment will limit the potential for a bubble, said Marc Pinsonneault , an economist with National Bank Financial in Montreal. “It reassures me in the current context, even if I wasn’t predicting a housing bubble,” he said in a telephone interview from Montreal. “People may have convinced themselves that the best investment they could make would be to buy a duplex or a triplex to resell it shortly thereafter.” Pinsonneault said today’s announcement doesn’t change his view that the housing market will gradually slow in the second half of this year. Squeezing Out Borrowers Derek Holt , an economist with Scotia Capital Inc., said the change to force people to qualify for the 5-year, fixed mortgage, means homebuyers would need to qualify for an extra C$200 a month in payments on an average mortgage where a 5 percent down payment is made. “It’s going to sideline a significant proportion of the first-time homebuyer segment,” Holt said. “That change will squeeze out the marginal borrower, because it’s like a 110 basis point rise in the qualifying mortgage rate.” Canada’s average five-year mortgage rate was 5.39 percent on Feb. 10. In May, it was 5.25 percent, the lowest since 1951, according to Bank of Canada figures . Carney has pledged to keep his main interest rate at a record low 0.25 percent through June unless the inflation outlook shifts. “We’re very pleased in the sense that they responded prudently, responsibly and they haven’t overreacted,” said Jim Murphy, president and chief executive of the Canadian Association of Accredited Mortgage Professionals. “The impact overall may be minimal and is very much focused on groups that the minister has concerns about in terms of rising rates.” Murphy, whose group counts 12,000 members, said about 20 percent of new mortgages last year were based on a variable rate and the proportion was rising. Bank of Canada Adviser David Wolf said in a January speech that it’s “premature” to conclude there’s a bubble in the housing market, and that increasing interest rates to slow it would crimp the recovery as the economy emerges from recession. To contact the reporter on this story: Alexandre Deslongchamps in Ottawa at adeslongcham@bloomberg.net ; Theophilos Argitis in Ottawa at targitis@bloomberg.net

Read the full article →

Euro Declines for Fifth Week on Greece Concerns, Slowing European Growth

February 13, 2010

By Ben Levisohn Feb. 13 (Bloomberg) — The euro slid for a fifth week versus the dollar amid concern European Union efforts to avoid default by Greece will undermine the currency region and a report showed the EU’s economic recovery almost stalled. The dollar rallied versus the yen after Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke said the central bank may raise the discount rate “before long” as economic stimulus measures are unwound. The euro yesterday touched an eight-month low versus the greenback as investors wait for the outcome of a Feb. 15-16 meeting of EU finance ministers that may provide details of a Greece bailout. “It’s a very volatile process,” said Ron Leven , currency strategist at Morgan Stanley in New York. “No matter how this gets worked out, you will see more fiscal tightening, economic weakness and a European Central Bank that will be delayed in hiking rates. We are bearish on the euro.” The euro dropped 0.3 percent to $1.3632 last week from $1.3678 on Feb. 5 for a fifth weekly decline, the longest streak in over a year. The 16-nation shared currency reached $1.3532 yesterday, the lowest since May 20. Against the yen, the euro rose 0.4 percent to 122.62, ending its four-week losing streak. The dollar rose 0.8 percent to 89.96 yen, from 89.25 last week. The euro has fallen 4.8 percent against the dollar this year and 7.9 percent against the yen. Futures traders this week increased bets to a record level that the euro will decline against the U.S. dollar. Less Than Forecast The difference in the number of wagers by hedge funds and other large speculators on a decline in the euro compared with those on a gain, the net position, was 57,152 on Feb. 9, compared with 43,741 a week earlier, figures from the Washington-based Commodity Futures Trading Commission show. The euro declined versus the dollar after the EU’s statistics office in Luxembourg yesterday said the region’s economy grew 0.1 percent in the fourth quarter, compared with economists’ forecasts for a 0.3 percent gain. It rose 0.4 percent in the third quarter. The 16-nation common currency dropped on Feb. 11 as a statement issued by European leaders offered few details on how they would help Greece weather its debt crisis. Traders questioned how the EU would respond to a fresh wave of speculative attacks against Greece or countries such as Spain and Portugal, which are also struggling to cut their budget deficits. ‘Inevitable Break-Up’ The EU plan, brokered by German Chancellor Angela Merkel , Greek Prime Minister George Papandreou and European Central Bank President Jean-Claude Trichet , called for closer monitoring of the Greek economy . “The statement bought the euro zone some time but unless something is done soon, downside pressure on the euro will persist,” said Geoffrey Yu , a currency strategist at UBS AG in London. The economic data will “give euro zone leaders an even greater incentive to get Greece sorted,” he said. Southern European countries are trapped in an overvalued currency and suffocated by low competitiveness, a situation that will lead to the break-up of the euro bloc, according to Societe Generale SA strategist Albert Edwards . The problem for countries including Portugal, Spain and Greece “is that years of inappropriately low interest rates resulted in overheating and rapid inflation,” London-based Edwards wrote in a report yesterday. “Any help given to Greece merely delays the inevitable break-up of the euro zone.” Greece, representing 2.7 percent of the trading bloc’s $13 trillion economy, posted a budget deficit of 12.7 percent of gross domestic product in 2009, more than four times the EU’s 3 percent limit. Real Fall The dollar on Feb. 10 rose against the yen after Bernanke, in testimony prepared for the House Financial Services Committee, said the central bank may soon raise the discount rate as part of the “normalization” of Fed lending. He said a move in the discount rate won’t signal any change in the outlook for monetary policy. “The Fed has been laying the ground work for how they will remove the monetary stimulus from the system,” said Andrew Busch , a global currency strategist at Bank of Montreal in Chicago. “It’s all baby steps in this path to normal monetary conditions.” Futures trading in Chicago yesterday showed a 49 percent chance that the Fed will raise its target lending rate by at least a quarter-percentage point by its September meeting, up from 43 percent a week ago. Brazil’s real fell yesterday as much as 1.6 percent to 1.8732 against the dollar, the biggest decline since Feb. 4, after China ordered banks to set aside more deposits as reserves for the second time in a month as part of an effort to cool growth in the world’s fastest-growing economy. The reserve requirement will rise 50 basis points, or 0.5 percentage point, effective Feb. 25, the People’s Bank of China said on its Web site on Feb 11. The existing level is 16 percent for the biggest banks and 14 percent for smaller ones. To contact the reporter on this story: Ben Levisohn in New York at blevisohn@bloomberg.net

Read the full article →

Canadian Corporate Bonds Outperform U.S. as Spreads Diverge: Canada Credit

February 11, 2010

By Chris Fournier and Theophilos Argitis Feb. 11 (Bloomberg) — Canada’s corporate bonds are diverging from those in the U.S. as investors bet that the nation’s banks are insulated from worsening government finances that threaten to slow the global economy and create more losses for financial institutions. The extra yield investors demand to buy debt issued by companies in Canada instead of government securities is unchanged this month at 123 basis points, while so-called spreads on U.S. bonds widened 9 basis points to 190 basis points, or 1.9 percentage points, according to Bank of America Merrill Lynch indexes. The difference in spreads reached 67 basis points this week, the most since Dec. 14. Canada’s financial system was named the soundest in the world for two consecutive years by the Geneva-based World Economic Forum. None of the nation’s banks collapsed or sought a bailout during the seizure in credit markets, as the U.S. spent more than $400 billion to support institutions, including American International Group Inc. and Citigroup Inc. “We’re still getting a lot more cash into our market and demand is overwhelming supply,” said Robert Follis , the managing director of corporate bond research in Toronto at Bank of Nova Scotia, Canada’s third-largest lender. “Our exposure to the more volatile financials is lower than in the U.S.” Bank of America Corp. in Charlotte, North Carolina, and New York-based Citigroup had their credit outlooks cut to “negative” from “stable” by Standard & Poor’s on Feb. 9. Bond Returns Canada’s company bonds have returned 2.04 percent this year, including accrued interest, compared with 1.11 percent in the U.S., Merrill Lynch’s indexes show. The average yield is 3.77 percent, below the 4.69 percent in the U.S. Elsewhere in credit markets, Canada sold C$3.2 billion ($3 billion) of three-year bonds yesterday at an average yield of 1.875 percent. Yields on the nation’s short-term debt are higher than those in the U.S. on speculation the Bank of Canada will need to raise interest rates faster than the U.S. Federal Reserve as Canada’s economy rebounds. Canada’s two-year note maturing in 2012 yields 1.35 percent, compared with 0.875 percent for a similar U.S. security. The Bank of Canada left the target overnight interest rate at a record low 0.25 percent in January and reiterated a pledge to hold it there through June, barring a change in the inflation outlook. The rate to exchange, or swap, floating- for fixed-rate payments for five years rose to 2.69 percent yesterday from 1.88 percent a year ago. The rate can be used to gauge expectations for future interest rate movements. Raising Forecasts Economists are raising their growth forecasts for Canada’s economy, as businesses in the U.S. and Canada build up inventories and record low rates fuel demand for homes. Canadian Finance Minister Jim Flaherty on Feb. 2 said the economists he consulted before next month’s budget boosted their growth estimates to 2.6 percent, from 2.3 percent in September. Statistics Canada reported Feb. 5 the country gained almost three times as many jobs as expected in January. Canada’s economy gained 43,000 jobs last month after losing 2,600 positions in December, Statistics Canada said in Ottawa. The median forecast of 22 economists in a Bloomberg News survey was for an increase of 15,000. The unemployment rate dropped to 8.3 percent from 8.5 percent. While U.S. President Barack Obama has proposed a new bank tax and banning banks from owning proprietary trading operations, hedge funds and private-equity funds, Flaherty has rejected imposing similar measures. Corporate borrowing costs globally have been rising amid concern worsening government finances will slow the global economy and make it harder for companies to meet debt payments. Canada, already with the lowest debt levels in the Group of Seven, plans to return to balanced budgets over the “medium term,” Flaherty has said. To contact the reporters on this story: Chris Fournier in Montreal at cfournier3@bloomberg.net ; Theophilos Argitis in Ottawa at targitis@bloomberg.net

Read the full article →