moratorium

This article was published in “The Louisiana Weekly” on January 30, 2011 The Gulf Coast remains banged up and broken from BP’s spill but worries that Louisiana workers would be hit hard by the federal drilling ban — which ended in October — haven’t materialized. In an early January report on the moratorium, public-private partnership GNO, Inc. said big job losses that it and others expected haven’t occurred so far. Employment in the coastal, oil patch grew in 2010, according to the Louisiana Workforce Commission last week. If you tank up with gasoline, you probably figured out awhile ago that oil prices are rising. Petroleum companies have no intention of missing that boat, and want staff on hand at production facilities in Louisiana and elsewhere to help them meet demand and capitalize on higher prices. Robin Barnes, executive vice president at GNO, Inc., said “job losses on the Louisiana coast are, at least initially, not as high as we expected last June. Large and small companies have tried to retain employees rather than lay them off, and in some cases have shortened their hours.” GNO, Inc.’s January report was the second in its three-part Economic Impact Series, including an already-released segment on fisheries and a soon-to-be issued, final part on Louisiana’s brand. Barnes said smaller firms on the coast have dipped into their savings to cover payrolls. “Some companies have managed to hold on with money received from BP claims and the Vessels of Opportunity program,” she noted. “Unemployment could rise in the coastal economy this year, however, as businesses deplete their savings.” In September, the U.S. Dept. of Interior revised projected Gulf job losses from the deepwater moratorium to a range of 8,000 to 12,000, from an earlier view of 23,000. Those figures compare with Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal’s forecast last spring that 20,000 jobs would be forfeited to the drilling ban. Last June, GNO, Inc. saw a potential drop of 12,500 to 21,900 full-time-equivalent positions from the deepwater moratorium. The group’s January report said “to date, we have not seen evidence of these projections,” but added that since June, Louisiana has lost over 25,000 jobs statewide. “While this cannot be assumed a direct correlation — unemployment was rising around the country — we are confident that the decrease in drilling permits and the significant slow-down of the oil and gas industry had an impact on this number.” Since the release of GNO, Inc.’s January report, however, Louisiana officials said that the state’s jobs grew in 2010 as a whole and that December’s unemployment rate of 7.2%, not seasonally adjusted, was unchanged from 2009′s end. Seasonally adjusted, the December jobless number was 8%. Last October, GNO, Inc. began releasing a Gulf Permit Index, tracking approved, federal deep and shallow water permits on a biweekly basis. On the shallow end, permits in the last quarter of 2010 averaged 6.3 per month versus 7.1 in the year earlier quarter. Curry Smith, GNO, Inc. communications and research manager, said last week, “only two, new deepwater drilling permits have been approved by BOEMRE since the moratorium ended on Oct. 12. And since then, only 16 new shallow-water permits have been approved, though there was no official ban on shallow drilling.” Deepwater permits were issued for new exploratory wells in November and December, respectively, to BHP Billiton Petroleum. Last week, Senator Mary Landrieu’s office said “five, deepwater platforms operating in the Gulf have left for other parts of the world, costing Louisiana and the Gulf Coast nearly 5,000 jobs.” Most of those rigs moved to the coast of Africa, in some cases temporarily, according to their owners. As a reference point, GNO, Inc. used 33 as the number of deepwater rigs shut in the Gulf by the drilling moratorium, though the actual figure is lower. The group said that each rig directly or indirectly employs between 415 and 732 Louisiana workers, and 33 rigs would employ between 13,695 and 24,156 workers. “While we have not seen evidence of this high level of unemployment, should the lack of permits continue, the number of jobs at risk is significant,” GNO, Inc’s January report said. Separately, Eileen Angelico, New Orleans spokeswoman for the federal Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Regulation and Enforcement, said last week that 21, rather 33 deepwater rigs were shut in the Gulf during the drilling ban. “Of the 33 deepwater rigs that were operating at the time that Interior Secretary Salazar called for the moratorium, 21 rigs eventually suspended operations,” she said. “Twelve rigs were completing operations, which were not covered under the moratorium, such as drilling a relief well; workover operations; and drilling waterflood, gas injections or disposal wells.” For example, Taylor Energy’s Diamond Ocean Saratoga was exempt as it continued to plug and abandon a Mississippi Canyon well, following platform damage from Hurricane Ivan. A notice from the Dept. of Interior late last May explained the types of rig operations that were exempt from the moratorium. Continuing with its reference number of 33 shut rigs, GNO, Inc. said “over the course of seven months from June to December 2010, 33 working, deepwater rigs would have accounted for state and parish income and rig royalties of between $9,868,799 and $16,864,585. We cannot assume that all these taxes were lost as a result of the moratorium, because — as we have discussed — income-tax paying workers have been kept on payroll, and some companies have found other sources of revenue.” Layoffs on rigs since last spring are far less than initially expected. The $100 million Rig Worker Assistance Fund, established with BP funds, was created to compensate rig employees unable to work as a direct result of the moratorium. GNO, Inc. said in January “this fund, housed at the Baton Rouge Area Foundation, has received approximately 624 applications, 343 of which were compensated. We estimate that each deepwater drilling rig relies on approximately 230 direct workers.” Rig employees did not lose their jobs in large numbers, and some workers that were laid off chose not to apply to the fund, GNO, Inc. said. The group said “job losses were mostly suffered by members of the low-income, unskilled labor force. The majority of directly and indirectly impacted businesses chose to retain most of their employees, despite a sharp drop-off in their needs for labor.” GNO, Inc. also said “drilling rigs may be keeping employees on payroll, but are not purchasing the goods and services — known in the industry as ‘rope, soap, and dope’ — that they did previously.” When asked what he thought about earlier projections that the moratorium could result in losses of 20,000 Gulf jobs, Don Briggs, president of the Louisiana Oil and Gas Association, said last week “I think they are probably high.” But, he said, “it’s been a very difficult number to quantify.” Briggs pointed out, for instance, that “companies like Baker Hughes, Halliburton and Schlumberger can move their people anywhere, to places such as the Haynesville,” the big natural gas-from-shale play in Northwest Louisiana. The GNO, Inc. study includes “qualitative” or anecdotal research from discussions with several, small business owners providing goods and services to oil and gas companies affected by the drilling ban. In addition, employees of non-profit groups assisting small businesses on Louisiana’s coast were interviewed. GNO, Inc. found that “the moratorium forced business owners to drastically change their business plans and utilize savings to compensate for significantly decreased revenue. Most small business owners have attempted to retain their employees in anticipation of drilling permits being granted in the near future.” GNO, Inc. expects that if drilling permits don’t increase much by second-quarter 2011, small businesses will be forced to begin major layoffs. Larger companies may choose to keep employees on longer, but not indefinitely. On January 3, BOEMRE told thirteen oil companies that they may be able to resume previously approved exploration and production activities without submitting revised plans. In its January report, GNO, Inc. said that its Gulf Permit Index had shown little increase in permits issued since then. “Thus, we maintain that a de facto, deepwater moratorium remains in place.” The group said that, given recent increases in shallow, permit approvals, however, “the de facto shallow-water moratorium ended.” GNO, Inc. said “the U.S. has experienced accidents in various industries, including mining, air travel, civil engineering, chemical transportation and others, yet none have resulted in the long-term, comprehensive shutdown of an industry.” The group does not weigh in on Louisiana’s clean energy-versus-oil debate. It does say “the safety of workers and the environment must be of paramount importance.” New systems and procedures should be described and implemented, using transparent methods. “This will allow the nation’s offshore oil and natural gas industry to return to work in a way that will preserve thousands of critical jobs,” in a region still recovering from hurricanes. Separately, Dr. Loren Scott, emeritus professor in economics at Louisiana State University, said he’s keeping an eye on job numbers in Metropolitan Statistical Areas in the coastal oil patch. In the Houma MSA, covering Lafourche and Terrebonne parishes, unemployment was 5.1%, not seasonally adjusted, in December, down from 5.7% in November and 5.3% in December 2009. Those numbers were all below prevailing national averages. Unemployment also fell in December in the Lafayette, Lake Charles and New Orleans MSAs, including Plaquemines Parish. Joseph Mason, LSU finance professor, said “nobody has a good number on job losses from the moratorium right now because of the nature of the holdups — limited licensing in shallow and deep water. The Administration and BOEMRE are still barely licensing projects — not just placing procedural hurdles, but simply locking out the industry, thereby leaving in place the ongoing, harsh economic effect.” Mason continued, saying “Obama said a few weeks back that permitting would gain speed,” but that hasn’t happened. Meanwhile, President Obama referred to oil as “yesterday’s energy” in his State of the Union speech last week, and said he wants the nation to focus on producing and using cleaner fuels. end

Follow this link:
Susan Buchanan: Jobs Lost to Deep Drilling Ban Less Than Predicted

{ 0 comments }

WASHINGTON — The Obama administration said Monday it will allow 13 companies to resume deepwater drilling without any additional environmental scrutiny, just months after saying it would require strict reviews for new drilling in the wake of the BP oil spill. The government said it was not breaking its promise to require environmental reviews because the 13 companies – which include Chevron USA Inc. and Shell Offshore Inc. – had already started drilling the wells without detailed environmental studies. Drilling was suspended last year when the administration imposed a months-long moratorium following the BP spill. The ban was lifted in October, but drilling has not yet resumed in waters deeper than 500 feet in the Gulf of Mexico. U.S. officials said the 13 companies must comply with new policies and rules before resuming activity at 16 Gulf of Mexico wells. All but three are exploratory wells – the same type BP was drilling when the blowout of the Deepwater Horizon rig occurred. The April 20 explosion killed 11 workers and set off the worst offshore oil spill in U.S. history. “For those companies that were in the midst of operations at the time of the deepwater suspensions (last spring), today’s notification is a significant step toward resuming their permitted activity,” said Michael Bromwich, director of the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Regulation and Enforcement. The decision is a victory for the drilling companies, which in the past had routinely won broad waivers from rules requiring detailed environmental studies. After the BP disaster, the Obama administration pledged it would require companies to complete environmental reviews before being allowed to drill for oil. The administration has been under heavy pressure from the oil industry, Gulf state leaders and congressional Republicans to speed up drilling in the Gulf of Mexico, which has come to a near halt since the moratorium on deepwater drilling was imposed last spring. The delay is hurting big oil companies such as Chevron Corp. and Royal Dutch Shell PLC, which have billions of dollars in investments tied up in Gulf projects that are on hold. Smaller operators such as ATP Oil & Gas Corp., Murphy Exploration & Production Co.-USA, and Noble Energy Inc., also have been affected. A federal report said the moratorium probably caused a temporary loss of 8,000 to 12,000 jobs in the Gulf region. Bromwich and other officials stressed that the policy announced Monday was not a reversal of its previous plans not to grant waivers known as categorical exclusions for deepwater projects. Instead officials characterized the action as a sort of grandfather clause that applies only to companies that had already begun drilling before the BP blowout. In August, Bromwich instructed his staff not to grant categorical exclusions for drilling plans that involve use of a blowout preventer similar to the one that failed to stop the BP spill. But the August directive did not specify that any companies would be exempted under a grandfather provision. “This decision was based on our ongoing review of environmental analyses in the Gulf and was in no way impacted by a singular company,” said Melissa Schwartz, a spokeswoman for Bromwich. Bromwich said in a statement that the new policy will accommodate companies whose operations were interrupted by the five-month moratorium on deepwater drilling, while ensuring that the companies can resume previously approved activities. William Snape, senior counsel for the Center for Biological Diversity, an environmental group, called the announcement “another sad chapter in agency denial that anything is wrong.” Snape said Bromwich and his boss, Interior Secretary Ken Salazar, seem to want dangerous oil and gas drilling to go on in the Gulf and Alaska “without any meaningful public scientific review of the risks learned from the BP disaster.” But Randall Luthi, president of the National Ocean Industries Association, called the announcement “a positive development for an industry that has been anxiously waiting to get back to work.” Marathon Oil Co. said it was seeking to obtain permits for deepwater drilling, including one project that was suspended by the moratorium. In an e-mailed statement, Marathon said it is working with the ocean energy bureau on the permits and is optimistic the company will receive approval. The firms will not be required to complete a detailed review under the National Environmental Policy Act, but they must comply with new policies and regulations set up in the wake of the BP spill, Bromwich said. The 13 companies won’t be required to revise their exploration plans if an updated estimate of the most oil that would be released in an uncontrolled spill is less than the amount included in spill-response plans on file with the bureau. If the worst-case discharge estimate is higher, “further reviews will be conducted,” according to the statement. The 13 companies that received the notice are: ATP Oil & Gas Corp.; BHP Billiton Petroleum (GOM) Inc.; Chevron USA Inc.; Cobalt International Energy; ENI U.S. Operating Co. Inc.; Hess Corp.; Kerr-McGee Oil & Gas Corp.; Marathon Oil Co.; Murphy Exploration & Production Co.-USA; Noble Energy Inc.; Shell Offshore Inc.; Statoil USA E & P Inc.; and Walter Oil & Gas Corp. ___ Associated Press writers Dina Cappiello in Washington and Harry R. Weber in New Orleans contributed to this story.

Read the original post:
Obama Allows Chevron, Shell And 11 Others To Resume Offshore Drilling Without Further Review

{ 0 comments }

Sheriff Who Refused To Evict Foreclosed Homeowners Forced To Resume

November 20, 2010

CHICAGO — An Illinois sheriff who halted foreclosure evictions last month because some bank employees weren’t following the proper procedures said Friday he’s been forced to order his deputies to carry them out, but he will continue investigating the matter and could charge banks and their employees with crimes. Cook County Sheriff Tom Dart said he is only ordering evictions to resume because county prosecutors told him that he was legally bound to carry out foreclosure eviction orders signed by a judge. “For the people who have been involved with this and think now that because the (Cook County) State’s Attorney’s office has ordered me to go ahead with the evictions that everything’s fine . . . No, we are going to be looking at you for criminal violations,” Dart said. “You may have got through one storm now, the other one is coming.” Dart singled out Bank of America, JP Morgan Chase and GMAC/Ally Financial last month for problems with eviction notices. He said Friday that investigators continue to find problems with bank employees signing off on foreclosure documents they haven’t read, although he did not single out individual companies. “When we asked a month ago . . . send me an affidavit to say that everything was done legally, not one organization, law firm handling these cases, not one of them sent in one document,” Dart said. “Not one, and they had over a month to do it.” The sheriff said that if anything, his office’s investigation has shown the problems that prompted the moratorium were even more widespread than he first thought. “We are being overwhelmed with abundant evidence that there are irregularities,” he said, adding that just a cursory investigation by his financial crimes unit has shown problems in eviction order after eviction order. “Irregularities are going on all over the place here. It’s the norm.” Tom Kelly, a spokesman for Chase, said that steps have been taken to ensure that foreclosure documents don’t have any problems in anticipation for the resumption of evictions later this month. Gina Proia, a spokeswoman for Ally Financial, said her company has been examining foreclosure documents carefully and has not found any cases of inappropriate notices being sent. A spokesman for Bank of America did not immediately return calls for comment. Dart said investigators found clear evidence of “robo-signing,” in which lenders’ employees sign scores of documents in a day that they could not have possibly have read to determine whether the foreclosures were legal. Investigators have, for example, come across documents signed by employees who have admitted in depositions in other parts of the country that they were taking part in “robo-signing,” he said. He also said that law school students have agreed to examine a total of 2,200 cases that have been submitted to his office, including the 1,800 that are ready for evictions to be carried out, to determine whether there were any irregularities. Cases where problems are spotted will be investigated further by his office to determine if criminal charges should be filed, he said. Dart also hinted that just because he is being forced to resume evictions, the banks shouldn’t expect his deputies to start carrying out the 1,800 evictions he said are ready to be executed. “We will move ahead with those cases, but we’ll do it in a thoughtful way,” he said, adding that the deputies would do things like put notices on doors and suggesting to homeowners places they might go for legal help. “We’re going to make sure all their rights are being looked after and we are proceeding in a lawful way where the due process people deserve is being looked after.”`

Read the full article →

Connecticut Halts All Bank Foreclosures

October 1, 2010

Connecticut Attorney General Richard Blumenthal on Friday ordered a moratorium on all foreclosures by all banks for 60 days–the most radical action taken by a state on issue of document irregularities. California also expanded the moratorium on foreclosures it announced last week on Ally Financial foreclosures to include those by J.P. Morgan Chase. Calling the companies’ review of key foreclosure documents “a ruse,” California Attorney General Jerry Brown (D) ordered J.P. Morgan to prove it is following the law before it continues foreclosures in the state.

Read the full article →

Video: Governor Perry Disputes Texas Budget Deficit Projection: Video

September 16, 2010

Sept. 16 (Bloomberg) — Texas Governor Rick Perry, a Republican, talks about the outlook for the state’s budget and legislative estimates about a possible deficit. Perry also discusses the impact of the moratorium on offshore oil drilling on the Texas labor market. He talks with Margaret Brennan on Bloomberg Television’s “InBusiness.” (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Drilling Moratorium Stays, Feds Tell Oil Spill Commission

August 23, 2010

WASHINGTON — The top federal offshore oil drilling regulator is telling the presidential oil spill commission that the temporary halt to deepwater drilling will remain in place for a few more months. The Interior Department issued the moratorium after the deadly April 20 BP oil rig explosion. It was overturned in court and reissued on July 13. Louisiana officials and residents have pleaded with the oil spill commission to do something about the moratorium. The presidential panel asked Interior officials whether they had any say in the matter and whether individual rigs could get exceptions. The nation’s top drilling regulator, Michael Bromwich, says he will propose a replacement for the moratorium by Halloween and leans against exceptions.

Read the full article →

Texas Sues Obama Administration Over ‘Unjustified’ Deepwater Drilling Moratorium

August 11, 2010

HOUSTON — The Texas attorney general sued the Obama administration Wendesday over its new deep-water offshore drilling moratorium, claiming it is unjustified and federal officials did not contact the state before issuing the ban. Attorney General Greg Abbott filed the 18-page suit in federal court in Houston against Department of the Interior Secretary Ken Salazar. The ban halted the approval of any new permits for deep-water projects and shut down drilling at 33 exploratory ocean wells in the wake of the BP spill in the Gulf of Mexico. In his lawsuit, Abbott called the ban “an unjustified, arbitrary and capricious policy that will inflict harm upon coastal communities.” Also, the suit said, federal officials did not coordinate with the state or consider the economic impacts before issuing the moratorium. Texas is one of the nation’s most active oil refinery states. State figures show there were 86,900 jobs in oil and natural gas extraction in April and an additional 107,800 in support industries. Interior Department spokeswoman Kendra Barkoff defended the ban but declined to comment specifically on the Texas lawsuit. “The Deepwater Horizon/BP oil disaster has made it clear that we need better health, safety and environmental standards for drilling operations,” Barkoff said in an e-mailed statement. “The temporary pause on deep-water drilling that Secretary Salazar has put in place is simply common sense, and we continue to stand behind it.” The current moratorium replaced one that was blocked by the courts. The Interior Department says it’s meant to give to give oil and gas companies time to implement adequate safety measures. The ban is in effect until Nov. 30, unless federal officials determine deep-water drilling operations have gotten safer. Also Wednesday, the Justice Department asked a federal judge who overturned the initial moratorium to throw out that court challenge filed by several offshore service companies, arguing that it is moot now that the new ban is in place. Company lawyers, however, claim the second moratorium is a “carbon copy” of the first and is a sham designed to circumvent U.S. District Judge Martin Feldman’s earlier order by prolonging the court challenge. The new ban does not seem to deviate much from the original moratorium in that it still targets deep-water drilling operators while defining them in a different way. ESNCO Offshore Co. has filed a separate lawsuit challenging the new moratorium. Feldman also is presiding over that case. Meanwhile, the Interior Department is hosting eight forums – including a Houston session in September – to gather information from experts and federal, state and local leaders about drilling safety reform, well containment and oil spill response. With that information, officials plan to consider whether to continue, end, reduce or expand the moratorium. ___ Associated Press Writer Michael Kunzelman in New Orleans contributed to this report.

Read the full article →

Video: Mason Sees Significant Economic Losses From Drilling Ban: Video

July 19, 2010

July 19 (Bloomberg) — Joseph Mason, a professor of finance at Louisiana State University, discusses the possible economic impact of the moratorium on new deepwater drilling following the BP Plc oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico. Mason is author of a study, commissioned by the American Energy Alliance, that finds the moratorium may cost the Gulf region 8,169 jobs and about $2.1 billion in economic losses in its first six months. The study also predicts that nationwide job losses will reach 12,000 in six months, costing the U.S. economy about $2.8 billion in lost growth and $219 million in tax revenue. Mason talks with Carol Massar and Matt Miller on Bloomberg Television’s “Street Smart.” (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Gulf Oil Spill: Victims Fund Chief Pledges Fast Payments

June 21, 2010

NEW ORLEANS — The administrator of a $20 billion fund to compensate Gulf oil spill victims pledged Monday to speed payment of claims as a federal judge considered whether to lift a six-month moratorium on new deepwater drilling. Kenneth Feinberg, who has been tapped by the White House to run the fund, said many people are in desperate financial straits and need immediate relief. “We want to get these claims out quicker,” he said. “We want to get these claims out with more transparency.” Feinberg, who ran the claim fund set up for victims of the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, said BP has paid out over $100 million so far. Various estimates place total claims so far in excess of $600 million. BP said it has spent $2 billion fighting the spill for the last two months and compensating victims, with no end in sight. It’s likely to be at least August before crews finish two relief wells that are the best chance of stopping the flow of oil. The British oil giant released its latest tally of response costs, including $105 million paid out so far to 32,000 claimants. That figure does not include the $20 billion fund BP PLC last week agreed to set up for residents and businesses hurt by the spill. Also Monday, the government sent BP a $51.4 million bill for the response effort. BP has already paid two other bills totaling $70.9 million. Shares of BP, which have lost about half their value since the April 20 oil rig disaster that killed 11 workers, fell nearly 3 percent Monday in New York trading to $30.86. The rig was owned by Transocean Ltd. but run by BP. BP chief executive Tony Hayward canceled a scheduled Tuesday appearance at a London oil conference, citing his commitment to the Gulf relief effort. The last-minute pullout followed stinging criticism of Hayward’s attendance at a yacht race on the Isle of Wight off the coast of southern England on Saturday. President Barack Obama’s administration has also been struggling to show it is responding forcefully to the spill, which has gushed anywhere from 68 million to 126 millions gallons of oil into the Gulf. As part of that effort, the Interior Department halted the approval of any new permits for deepwater drilling and suspended drilling at 33 existing exploratory wells in the Gulf. But a lawsuit filed by Hornbeck Offshore Services of Covington, La., claims the government arbitrarily imposed the moratorium without any proof that the operations posed a threat. Hornbeck says the moratorium could cost Louisiana thousands of jobs and millions of dollars in lost wages. After hearing two hours of arguments Monday in New Orleans federal court, Judge Martin Feldman said he will decide by Wednesday whether to overturn the moratorium. Plaintiffs’ attorney Carl Rosenblum said the six-month suspension of drilling work could prove more economically devastating than the spill itself. “This is an unprecedented industrywide shutdown. Never before has the government done this,” Rosenblum told the judge Monday. Government lawyers said the Interior Department has demonstrated that industry regulators need more time to study the risks of deepwater drilling and identify ways to make it safer. “The safeguards and regulations in place on April 20 did not create a sufficient margin of safety,” said Justice Department attorney Guillermo Montero. Feldman asked a government lawyer why the Interior Department decided to suspend deepwater drilling after the rig explosion when it didn’t bar oil tankers from Alaskan waters after the Exxon Valdez spill in 1989 or take similar actions in the wake of other industrial accidents. “The Deepwater Horizon blowout was a game-changer,” Montero said. “It really illustrates the risks that are inherent in deepwater drilling.” Feldman asked Rosenblum if it’s true that a recent Securities and Exchange Commission filing by Hornbeck suggests “basically things are pretty good” for the company and it can survive the moratorium. Rosenblum said the full impact of the shutdown cannot be calculated. “Thousands of businesses will be affected,” he said. “These dominoes are falling as we speak.” Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal’s office filed a brief supporting the plaintiffs’ suit. A lawyer for the state told Feldman that the federal government did not consult Louisiana officials before imposing the moratorium, in violation of federal law. Catherine Wannamaker, a lawyer for several environmental groups that support the moratorium, said six months is a reasonable time for drilling to be suspended while the government studies the risks and regulations governing the industry. “The risks here are new,” she said. Government lawyers said the plaintiffs haven’t seen much of the data that served as the basis for the Interior Department’s decision to suspend drilling operations. Secretary of the Interior Ken Salazar “wants to be sure deepwater drilling is as safe as we all thought it was on the day before the incident on April 20,” said government lawyer Brian Collins. U.S. District Judge Nancy Atlas in Houston listened to Monday’s hearing over the telephone. Atlas is presiding over a similar case against the Interior Department filed by Diamond Offshore Co., which operates a fleet of drilling rigs. Along the coast Monday, some cleanup workers reported progress. On Barataria Bay off the coast of Louisiana, thick globs of oil that washed onto marshy islands a week ago had disappeared, leaving a mass of stained bushes and partly yellowed grasses. Blackened lengths of boom surrounded the islands, which were still teeming with brown pelicans, gulls and other seabirds, some with visible signs of oil on their plumage. Nearby, shrimp boats that have been transformed into skimmers hauled absorbent booms across the water’s surface, collecting some of the remaining oil. Crews aboard Navy and Coast Guard boats teamed with local fishermen using booms to funnel oil into a vessel and haul it offshore. This is the area’s new economy – dependent as ever on the sprawling bay, but now those who made their living harvesting its bounty are focused on its healing. “It looks 10 times better than it did a week ago,” said Carey O’Neil, 42, a commercial fisherman idled by the spill who now provides tours of the damaged areas for media and government observers in his 23-foot boat anchored in Grand Isle. “But what impact will this have for the future – two, three, four, even 10 years? That’s what worries me.” The number of oil-soaked birds in the area is down significantly, from 60 or 70 a day at the triage center on Grand Isle to more like seven or eight, said Steve Martarano, a spokesman for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. “We’ve been sending 55 boats a day out pretty much since day one, when the oil hit this area, and so we feel like we’ve really made inroads,” he said. ___ Associated Press writers John Flesher and Ramit Plushnick-Masti in Barataria, La., and Robert Barr in London contributed to this report.

Read the full article →

Crude Oil Follows Equities Lower, But Gulf Moratorium Provides Support

June 2, 2010

Crude Oil Follows Equities Lower, But Gulf Moratorium Provides Support

Read the full article →

House Republicans Eschew Election-Year Earmarks in Bid to Outdo Democrats

March 11, 2010

By Brian Faler March 11 (Bloomberg) — House Republicans announced they will not request any so-called earmarks in an election-year attempt to outdo Democrats in clamping down on the practice of adding money for pet projects to legislation. Republicans agreed to a moratorium in a closed-door meeting today, said Representative Jerry Lewis of California, the top Republican on the Appropriations Committee. Yesterday, House Democrats said they wouldn’t fund earmarks for defense contractors, energy firms and other companies. Critics say earmarks for companies amount to no-bid contracts for groups that contribute to lawmakers’ re-election campaigns. Both parties are attempting to turn what has been bipartisan support for the earmarking process into a partisan issue they can take to voters, who polls show are concerned about rising federal spending and deficits. Republican leaders issued a joint statement yesterday urging their colleagues to give up projects they called “a symbol of broken Washington.” Lewis, a prominent defender of the earmarking practice, told reporters earlier today he was supporting the moratorium because “you guys paint the picture one way — we’ve got to be responsive.” To contact the reporter on this story: Brian Faler  in Washington at   or bfaler@bloomberg.net .

Read the full article →

IRS Extends Moratorium Until June 1 on Tax Levy Fought by Small Business

March 4, 2010

By Margaret Collins March 4 (Bloomberg) — The U.S. Internal Revenue Service will extend a moratorium on penalties until June 1 for failing to report transactions considered tax shelters. The rule applies to individuals or other taxpayers that fail to disclose transactions the IRS deems as potentially tax evading, such as employer contributions to post-retirement benefit funds. The levy is as high as $100,000 a year for individuals and $200,000 for all other taxpayers, according to the IRS. It is assessed each year a transaction is not reported and may be charged to both a business and its owner. The department will also “hold off” filing new lien notices on amounts owed, IRS Commissioner Doug Shulman told Congress yesterday. “The penalty has ended up snagging small businesses that weren’t advised of their responsibility to disclose,” Senator Ben Nelson , a Nebraska Democrat, said in a statement last month. The provision was designed to crack down on tax shelters for big corporations and wealthy individuals, and has been applied to small-business owners who’ve paid into retirement accounts for themselves and their employees without following IRS disclosure requirements, said Kathleen Pakenham, a New York- based partner at White & Case LLP , who represents 30 such clients. “Some of these businesses were assessed tax penalties as high as $300,000 per year but received a tax benefit for as little as $15,000 from the transaction,” Senator Charles Grassley , an Iowa Republican, said in a statement on Dec. 23. There were about 30 million businesses with fewer than 500 employees in 2008, according to the U.S. Small Business Administration’s Office of Advocacy. Bandage “It’s a Band-Aid,” said Pakenham of the moratorium. “It’s not addressing the underlying problem.” The Senate passed legislation on Feb. 9 that would make the fee assessed proportional to the tax benefit received. The House of Representatives has not yet passed a similar bill. The IRS’s moratorium suspends penalties on individuals who received less than $100,000 in savings from unreported transactions and under $200,000 for other taxpayers. The U.S. tax code assesses more than 150 penalties, according to a June report by the Government Accountability Office. In fiscal year 2007, the IRS levied more than 37.6 million civil penalties, totaling more than $29.5 billion, according to the GAO. To contact the reporter on this story: Margaret Collins in New York at mcollins45@bloomberg.net .

Read the full article →

Barney Frank Clashes With Ed Schultz Over Bank Bonuses: "Don’t Condescend To Me" (VIDEO)

November 9, 2009

MSNBC’s Ed Schultz and Congressman Barney Frank (D-Ma.) clashed tonight over Congress’s response, or lack of response, to the news that JPMorgan, Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley are distributing $30 billion in bonuses this year, a 60 percent increase on their bonus payments from last year. The “newsflash” on the bonuses, according to Schultz, is that there is nothing Congress can do to stop it. Frank disagreed, saying Congress has a few tools at its disposal: “We can tax it. Let’s not forget that.” Schultz argued that this misses the point because “we dished out billions of dollars to Wall Street and they’re doing the bonus dance right now. That wasn’t in the fine print, Barney, and you know that.” Frank took umbrage at this, pointedly telling Schultz not to “condescend to him.” Schultz refused to back down: Congressman, why can’t you just admit that this was a serious misstep on the part of the Congress. You forked out billions of dollars to save the economy. I get all that, to get the structure back going again. But you didn’t ask them any questions about how this is gonna go. Frank insisted Schultz is wrong, and that if Congress passed the legislation pending to allow shareholders to vote on bonuses then they would veto these large payouts. The disagreement largely boils down to Schultz accusing Congress of being too lax with Wall Street and Frank defending the body’s actions. In October 2008, Frank advocated a freeze on Wall Street bonuses, reports Bloomberg . “There should be a moratorium on bonuses,” Frank said at the time. “They have a negative incentive effect because they are the ones that say if you take a risk and it pays off you get a big bonus,” but if those risks cause losses “you don’t lose anything.” Frank said the moratorium “ought to be for all firms,” and that it should last “until [Wall Street] can get a better structure without that perverse incentive.” He added that the freeze shouldn’t be limited to those firms getting bailouts. WATCH: Visit msnbc.com for Breaking News , World News , and News about the Economy

Read the full article →