number

menafn.com…

http://www.abnnewswire.net/rss2/menafn/abn_menafn_en.asp At present, offshore oil accounts for about 33 percent of the world total output, and the number will reach 35 in ten years, in which, …

Excerpt from:
The 4th Deepwater Asia Congress 2012 to Kick Off on May 23-25, in Bali, Indonesia

Find our Weekly Commercial Real Estate, Private Equity and Fund Newsletters at www.WeeklyBrief.net

{ 0 comments }

Huffington Post…

With Mylan Pharmaceuticals’ announcement today that Heather Bresch — company president and daughter of West Virginia Senator Joe Manchin — would succeed outgoing CEO Robert Coury, the number of female CEOs on the Forbes Fortune 500 list reached 18, a new record. At 42, Bresch is the youngest female CEO on the list. Though joining the ranks of the Fortune 500 CEO club puts her in the company of some of the most prolific and successful Post50 women in the world. At #11, Hewlitt-Packard CEO and former Republican gubernatorial candidate Meg Whitman leads the charge as the first women named on a list that also includes such titans as Andrea Jung, Indra Nooyi and Patricia Woertz. Here are the 16 Post50 women named by Forbes in its annual top Fortune 500 CEOs list :

See the article here:
Female Fortune 500 CEOs At Record High

Find our Weekly Commercial Real Estate, Private Equity and Fund Newsletters at www.WeeklyBrief.net

{ 0 comments }

Greece welcomes 10% more tourists from Jan-July

August 26, 2011

(MENAFN) Greek Tourism Enterprises Association’s (SETE) director, Andreas Andreadis, said that in 2011′s first seven months, the number of foreign tourists coming to the country grew 10 percent, …

Read the full article →

Stiglitz: IMF Chief Must ‘Continue Along The Reform Path’

June 3, 2011

NEW YORK – Sooner than expected, the International Monetary Fund will have a new managing director. For more than a decade, I have criticized the Fund’s governance, symbolized by the way its leader is chosen. By gentlemen’s agreement among the majority shareholders – the G-8 – the managing director is to be a European, with Americans in the number two post and at the head of the World Bank.

Read the full article →

Online Labor Demand Rises To Pre-Recession Levels As Labor Market Slows

June 2, 2011

NEW YORK — The unemployment rate remains high, but online demand for workers has reached levels not seen since before the recession, according to a new report. Online labor demand, as measured by help-wanted advertisements posted on the Internet, rose in May by 148,800 listings to a high of 4.5 million advertised vacancies. That number hasn’t been reached since May 2005, according to the Conference Board , a global independent business membership and research association. The findings mean that as of April, for every three workers out of a job, there is one advertised vacancy. That stands in contrast to the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ latest ratio , which showed approximately four unemployed workers for every opening in March. “Overall, the trend in online advertised vacancies has been positive this year,” said June Shelp, Vice President at the Conference Board and author of the report. But economists, including Shelp, caution to take the Conference Board’s numbers with a grain of salt. The caveat, Shelp said, is that “while we have now returned to the pre-recession levels of labor demand, the big difference today is the larger number of unemployed workers that are seeking jobs compared to four years ago.” Positions advertised online are not a guarantee of employment, and vacancies can take months to fill. Plus, a given vacancy might not be filled by an unemployed worker. In fact,

Read the full article →

Investors Jump Back Into Rebounding Hotel Market

June 2, 2011

With the U.S. hotel sector firmly in recovery mode, the number of large hotel investment sales has continued to rise in the second quarter. More properties are coming onto the market in response to a growing amount of capital seeking hotel investment, with private-equity funds, institutional buyers and other types of buyers joining REITs in the competition for high quality lodging assets. The already-hot pace of deals seems to have accelerated…

Read the full article →

JCPenney Plans Supply Chain Restructuring; Reduced Store Openings

May 19, 2011

J. C. Penney Co. plans to streamline its supply chain operations and has trimmed back the number of new stores it expects to open by 2014. Currently in the second year of its 2010-2014 long-range plan, the department store chain is looking to re-align its enterprise-wide approach to inventory management. “We have some legacy supply chain facilities that support our catalog and Internet operations together,” Myron E. (Mike) Ullman, III, chairman…

Read the full article →

Marty Kaplan: Who’s Afraid of a Countdown Clock?

May 13, 2011

Please don’t run a countdown clock on the debt ceiling. For weeks , that’s what Jack Lew, the Obama Administration’s director of the Office of Management and Budget, has been urging the television networks not to do. You know the kind of clock he means. It’s what we saw on the cable news channels in April as the absence of a deal on the federal budget raised the prospect of a government shutdown. To boost ratings, few things beat whipping up a little Perils of Pauline suspense about whether the Washington Monument will be shuttered and Social Security checks will stop. In 18 hours and 42 minutes, it could be cat food for Granny. Stay tuned! Sometimes the clock starts after the event. “This is the 143d day of the Iranian hostage crisis,” the network anchors said, flipping the pages of the nightly humiliation calendar during the last 444 days of the Carter Administration. Keith Olbermann did something similar with the number of days since “Mission Accomplished” was declared in the Iraq war. Does it matter? In the Carter case, it may well have cemented his 1980 loss to Ronald Reagan. (Double-digit inflation and gas rationing also didn’t help.) In the recent wrangling over the budget, the looming deadline mattered, but it’s hard to believe that the deal the negotiators reached was actually affected by the Nielsens stunt. This time, though, it’s different. That’s Jack Lew’s point, which has also been made by Democrats like Obama economic advisor Gene Sperling and House minority whip Steny Hoyer (D.-Md.), and by liberal columnists like E.J. Dionne . The reason they want the networks to abjure debt ceiling countdown clocks is the fear that they will spook the markets. If the full faith and credit of the United States is in doubt, then no one will trust our bonds, interest rates will spike, unemployment will climb, our fragile recovery will be derailed and the world will be plunged into an even deeper recession. I can see why Republicans aren’t clamoring for the media to can the clocks. They insist that they won’t raise the debt ceiling unless Democrats couple that vote with an agreement to cut spending by at least $2 trillion. Cutting tax expenditures, say the Republicans, won’t count as cutting spending; the top six publicly-traded oil companies made a staggering $38 billion in first-quarter profits, but the GOP has taken the $4 billion-per-year federal subsidy to Big Oil off the table, as well as the $1 trillion in Bush tax cuts for the wealthy that President Obama wants to eliminate. It’s in the Republicans’ interest to portray anything less than total capitulation by the Democrats as an invitation to global collapse. If doomsday clocks incite a little pre-midnight foretaste of economic meltdown, all the better: the Democrats will have no choice but to cave. The clocks would have the perverse virtue of transforming a GOP bluff into an actual game of chicken, with the Republicans taking the steering wheel off and throwing it out the window. What puzzles me is why the markets would be spooked by a TV clock. These are the same markets that are universally said to have already discounted any event that you and I find out about. A wheat fungus in Ukraine, a class-action defeat, a movie that bombs, a CEO ouster, a bad quarter: whenever I think I have a bead on the future, the financial chattering class tells me that the institutional investors, private wealth managers and arbitrageurs have been yawning about that news for months. So you’d think that the wizards of Wall Street, the gnomes of Zurich and the other masters of the universe would by now be totally blasé about some ticking widget that Bloomberg, Fox and MSNBC might use to scare up, and scare, an audience. Is it really conceivable that the people who actually pull the strings of the international economy — not the day-traders and duffers who watch cable to find out what’s going on, but the Davos crowd who truly move markets — is it possible that a cornball countdown clock could cause them to panic? I don’t think so. My bet is that Beijing, Brussels and the rest of the financial capitals decided some time ago that John Boehner (R-Oh.) and Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) are neither nuts enough nor politically fearful enough to permit the Tea Party to make them accomplices to an economic apocalypse. Sure, there’s a psychological element to the market, but no cable network’s catastrophe-porn chyron is going to be influential enough to jeopardize any media mogul’s fortune. So why are Democrats playing the clock card? My guess: To spook the media about giving the Tea Party a free ride. If cable coverage of the debt ceiling negotiation is framed as a fight over how much spending should be cut, the Republicans win, no matter where the number comes out. But if the question of whether running a clock is civically reckless gains some traction, then the story becomes whether the Tea Party is taking the American economy hostage. Whether cable stations run a countdown or not, the controversy draws viewers, so the networks win either way. I just wish that were also true for the country. This is my column from The Jewish Journal of Greater Los Angeles . You can read more of my columns here , and e-mail me there if you’d like.

Read the full article →

David Isenberg: The Uncounted Contractor Casualties

May 10, 2011

Of all the things said and written about private military and security contractors working for the U.S. government in various war zones, one of the least discussed is the sacrifices they make. And like regular military forces, they also pay the ultimate sacrifice, as in dying. Unlike regular military personnel, their deaths rarely get any notice, aside from a company press release and a few paragraphs in the hometown newspaper. Their sacrifices are so unrecognized that if Washington, D.C. were to build yet another war memorial on the mall, The Tomb of the Unknown Contractor would have to be considered a viable candidate for selection. To paraphrase the old saw about regular military forces, one might say in regard to recognition of contractors wounded and killed, “nothing is too good for our contractors, so that’s what we’ll give them. Nothing.” Admittedly, there is slightly better recognition of the wounded and dead contractors than when the U.S. invaded Afghanistan and Iraq — but that is not saying a whole lot. There simply has not been much detailed analysis of this subject. That is why a

Read the full article →

In Deposition, Donald Trump Admitted Exaggerating His Net Worth, Stretching The Truth

April 22, 2011

Q: Let me just ask you first about the first sentence there: Trump relentlessly bloviating about his developments — this is going to be the biggest, best, most amazing — leads people to assume he exaggerates his net worth. Do you see that? A: Yes. Q: Do you know what bloviating means? A: Well, I’m not sure that there’s an exact definition, but I would imagine that’s what it means. Q: Exaggeration? A: Could be, yeah. Q: Lying? A: No. [from a deposition given by Donald Trump in a libel lawsuit] * * * * * NEW YORK — Notorious for his lack of modesty, Donald Trump has long flaunted his wealth and touted his net worth as a multibillionaire. During his Comedy Central roast, which aired last month, the real estate developer and possible 2012 presidential candidate joked, “What’s the difference between Donald Trump’s hair and a wet raccoon? A wet raccoon doesn’t have seven fucking billion dollars in the bank.” Now that he’s considering a campaign on the Republican ticket, he’s wielding his bravado as a political cudgel. He recently mocked multimillionaire Mitt Romney’s reputation as a successful businessman by declaring himself “many, many, many times Mitt Romney.” Yet Trump has often been accused of exaggerating his wealth, even adding a few zeroes to the actual amount, which may undermine his credibility as a candidate with business credentials. Despite Trump’s own claims that he’s worth around $7 billion, last September the most recent Forbes 400 rankings — which many consider to have overestimated the real estate developer’s wealth in the past — estimated his net worth at $2.4 billion, putting him in a six-way tie for 153rd-richest person in America. And a deposition in a defamation lawsuit filed by Trump provides numerous examples of him stretching the truth about his success in real estate. Former New York Times editor and reporter (and current Huffington Post national editor) Timothy L. O’Brien wrote in his 2005 book, “TrumpNation: The Art of Being the Donald,” that the developer was probably worth $150 to $250 million, rather than the typical estimates of $2 to $3 billion. Trump sued O’Brien for libel, claiming that the book’s lower figure killed some potential deals and damaged his reputation. The case was dismissed, but Trump filed an appeal and a decision is pending. Trump’s deposition, taken on Dec. 19-20, 2007, was obtained by The Huffington Post and CNN . In 2005, Trump claimed that he was worth $3.5 billion, but a financial analysis by North Fork Bank estimated his worth at just $1.2 billion. The previous year, when he was claiming a worth in excess of $3 billion, Deutsche Bank estimated his worth much lower, at $788 million. Asked in the deposition about his statements in 2007 that his net worth was $8 billion, Trump conceded: “I don’t know. I don’t think so. Well, maybe I’m adding 4 or 5 billion dollars worth, 3 billion, for the value of a brand. But I don’t know.” Such comments prompted CNN contributor Jeffrey Toobin to tell “In the Arena” host Eliot Spitzer on Thursday night that the deposition could be used against Trump by his GOP opponents: “They could beat him over the head with this,” Toobin said. Among the deposition’s most glaring examples of his fondness for exaggeration, Trump was asked why he claimed in several media accounts that he had a 50 percent interest in the massive Riverside South project on Manhattan’s Upper West Side when he actually had a much smaller interest. “I own 30 percent,” Trump replied. “But because of the fact I put no money up, that 30 percent is equated to 50 percent.” At another point, he is quizzed about his claim to CNN’s Larry King that he earned over $1 milliion from a speech he gave to the Learning Annex. Trump admits that he was actually paid only $400,000 in cash, proffering the novel argument that adding in the annex’s promotional expenses puts his payment in the $1 million-plus range. In November 2007, Trump wrote a letter to the editor of the Wall Street Journal to complain about a story on his net worth, explaining that a development in Hawaii was a huge success. “My tower in Waikiki was 100 percent sold out with 729 million in sales, 5 hours, a record,” he wrote. Yet he admitted in the deposition that he doesn’t actually own the building — he just has a licensing agreement with the real owners. At another moment, he is asked about $18.3 million in insurance proceeds he received due to hurricane damage to his Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida in 2005, explaining that he never felt obligated to turn that money over to the club or to spend all the money on repairs. And he told Crain’s New York Business in 2004 and 2005 that his Trump Organization has 22,000 employees, but admitted in the deposition that some of those employees are “not directly” on the payroll. Some are “suppliers, including construction workers, people that supply items to your building.” For his part, Trump lawyer Michael Cohen told The Huffington Post that Trump is worth “a lot … substantially more than what’s recorded in Forbes .” “They don’t take into account the value of the Trump brand, of the mark, one of the most valuable marks that’s ever been created,” Cohen said. “He has very little debt, triple-A assets. He is going to provide audited financial disclosures when the time comes, if in fact he decides to run — I think you’re going to be shocked by the number that’s being released.” Those records have yet to be prepared, Cohen said, but Trump does obviously have audited financials year to year.” “I don’t think there’s any downside,” to Trump running for president, Cohen added. Trump has claimed it is rare for him to file a defamation lawsuit, but O’Brien’s lawyers noted the number of times that he has threatened to sue, citing the following targets: • The New York Times • Rosie O’Donnell • Fortune magazine • Author Robert Slater • George magazine • Wall Street Journal reporters Neil Barsky and Alex Frangos (for separate stories) • The New York Post (twice) • Tina Brown (after Vanity Fair published a profile that described how Trump keeps a book of Hitler speeches by his bed, prompting Trump to write Brown that writer Marie Brennan “was a sick woman who couldn’t see fairness if it was staring her in the face.”) • The Chicago Tribune architectural critic Paul Gapp • The Los Angeles Times ‘ David Lazarus

Read the full article →

Gemma Godfrey: Hedge Funds — to Be Feared or Favored?

April 21, 2011

As the biggest hedge fund insider trading case comes to a close, we are reminded of the risks of investing in the asset class. Ever since generating losses in 2008, the reputation of these ‘absolute return’ vehicles has been damaged. The Madoff scandal which topped off the year did not help. Nevertheless, whilst clarity in the markets remains illusive and with a wider range of tools to exploit opportunities, are they a form of investment to be feared or favored? A Tainted Asset Class Disappointed and disillusioned, many investors are reluctant to revisit the asset class run by managers once hailed as the new ” masters of the universe “. Sold on the promise of generating positive performance in any market environment or at the very least preserving capital in times of stress, losses generated in 2008 came as a shock. With the Madoff scandal came the realization that even funds that did consistently generate steady returns were not immune to trouble. There is even an aptly named ” Hedge Fund Implode-o-Meter ” website tracking the number of major funds which have “imploded” since late 2006 (out of interest the number at last look stands at 117 , although this includes all funds suffering any form of ” permanent adverse change “, not just total shutdown). But Not All Are Created Equal Not all hedge funds should be tarred with the same brush and although grouped within the same category, they can differ tremendously. From the investment vehicles in which they invest to the stringency of their risk management, not all are created equal. The Hedge Fund Association summed the situation up succinctly with the assertion that “investment returns, volatility, and risk vary enormously among the different hedge fund strategies. Some strategies which are not correlated to equity markets are able to deliver consistent returns with extremely low risk of loss, while others may be as or more volatile than mutual funds.” Losses Were Often Greater Elsewhere Putting aside the often misleading ‘absolute return’ banner, the average hedge fund was better able to preserve capital through the market downturn than a regular ‘long-only’ mutual fund. Whilst the MSCI World Index fell 42% in 2008, the Credit/Suisse Tremont Hedge Fund Index fell 19%, More impressive still were the 21% of funds which posted positive returns for the year (the majority of which were up double digits). Crucially, over a more appropriate investment horizon of 3 years, according to figures by EDHEC Business School, ” The majority of hedge funds delivered better returns than the S&P 500 index “. Hedge Funds have shown themselves able of generating highly attractive returns. The Tide Has Changed Investors have demanded more. In 2008 they ‘spoke with their feet’ and the hedge fund industry suffered $782bn of redemptions. The Hedge Funds had to listen. What was requested, according to a report by Scorpio Partnership , was ” transparency, simplicity and liquidity “. Likewise, the Hedge Fund Scandals were a wake up call to investors and much more focus is being placed on operational due diligence , to avoid investing in any future hedge fund failures. Investment Conclusion: Well-Positioned to Exploit Opportunities With the risk of future macro shocks clouding the horizon (read: Japan , Middle East , EU Sovereign Debt ), the direction of the markets is somewhat hard to predict. Therefore investing with flexible managers able to react to the quickly changing environment and nimble enough to exploit opportunities when they present themselves seems an attractive move. Not all investments are created equal, but some are more equal than others.

Read the full article →

Cohesive Information Solutions, Inc. Hires Mike Beasley as Vice President of Strategic Accounts

April 4, 2011

KENNESAW, GA–(Marketwire – April 4, 2011) – Cohesive Information Solutions, Inc., the number one reseller of Maximo/Tivoli software in North America, announced today the hiring of Mike Beasley as Vice President of Strategic Accounts. Mike brings 25+ years sales experience serving the utility and oil and gas industries.

Read the full article →

Top Digital Media Companies Of 2010

March 31, 2011

Few can question the rise of digital media, but arguably just as few can tell you who’s leading the pack. But paidContent did just that, ranking the top 50 digital media companies in the U.S. based on a number of factors, namely digital sales. If the sales figures were publicly available, that’s the number they used. Otherwise paidContent established a reasonable estimate based on a variety of reports. Overall it’s a pretty solid list , but check it out for yourself to decide if you think these companies are leading the way. Perhaps most telling is how these companies generate their revenue. Of the 50 companies on the list only 13 made their money be selling subscriptions or services (notably Netflix). The other 37 generate most of their money the old-fashioned way, through ads. Click here for the full paidContent 50 , or check out the top 10 in the slideshow below.

Read the full article →

Video: Study Shows Too-Big-To-Fail U.S. Banks Grew After Crisis

March 18, 2011

March 18 (Bloomberg) — The largest U.S. banks have grown larger since the financial crisis, and the number of “too-big-to-fail” banks will increase by 40 percent over the next 15 years, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. The Dodd-Frank law would prohibit the largest banks from merging with one another. The law would not prevent the largest banks from growing in other ways, according to the Bloomberg Government Study, “Too-Big-to-Fail Banks Get Bigger After Dodd-Frank.” Bloomberg’s Lizzie O’Leary reports. (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Japan’s Earthquake Estimated To Cost Insurers Upwards Of $50B

March 12, 2011

NEW YORK — Japan’s massive earthquake has led to untold damages to life and property. Early estimates for the losses for insurers and reinsurers around the globe are ranging from $10 billion to $50 billion. Aflac Inc., which sells health and life insurance to one out of every four people in Japan, says it is monitoring the situation closely. “The sheer devastation is a shock,” said Aflac CEO Dan Amos in an interview. “This will probably impact 3 to 4 million out of the 100 million people in Japan.” Amos says the number of deaths is small compared to the size of the earthquake, but says he expects a lot of people to be treated for injuries. Though he expects the number of claims to be high, Amos says the company is well prepared to cover them. Amos is flying into Japan on Sunday. Aflac stock was down only 0.3 percent on Friday. The losses to property and casualty will likely be higher as entire homes and buildings were washed by the tsunami and many business locations were flooded. A Credit Suisse report says the initial reports estimate a range from $10 billion to $50 billion. In Europe, the stocks of some of the world’s biggest reinsurance companies fell sharply Friday on fears that the earthquake in Japan and the subsequent tsunami will cost them dearly. Reinsurers led many of Europe’s major stock indexes lower. Swiss Re and Munich Re both fell about 4 percent. Hannover Re was down around 5 percent. The companies issue backup insurance to primary insurers so that the system can cover large losses from disasters. Hannover Re already said last week it expected to pay out euro150 million ($207 million) for the earthquake that hit New Zealand.

Read the full article →

Dr. Sasha Galbraith: Women and Quotas: Will It Break the (Plexi) Glass Ceiling?

February 26, 2011

A debate on boardroom quotas continues to percolate through the European and American media, especially of late. Bloomberg BusinessWeek recently hosted a rather tepid discussion on the topic, while the Financial Times published a more thoughtful set of articles tackling the issue. The fact is, in the U.S. women occupy a paltry 15 percent of Fortune 500 board seats — and this number has hardly budged for years. The UK’s boardroom gender composition has stagnated at 12.5 percent female. In Asia, the number is in the single digits. With Thursday’s release of the Lord Davies report on women in the boardroom, the UK rejected instituting quotas for women at the top of FTSE 100 companies. The Davies panel appointed to review the issue has instead recommended that companies follow “voluntary targets” to hire more women at senior levels. Specifically, the panel recommended that FTSE 100 companies aim to achieve a one in four ratio of women to men on boards by 2015 — or else quotas should be instituted. You can just hear the howls of discontent among businessmen (and a few executive women ) worldwide: “It’s not right! Women — like their male colleagues — should be appointed strictly on merit, not because of their gender. Since when should the government dictate to us who should be on our board? We pick board members based on their talent and proven experience in running major companies. It’s just a matter of time before there are qualified women.” Well, that sentiment hasn’t worked very well in the past few decades, has it? It sounds very much like a pipeline argument to me. Women entered the workforce in earnest during the 1960s and ’70s. Most of those women are now getting ready to retire. Today their daughters are in the prime of their careers poised to jump into top management, but they still face a very thick (plexi) glass ceiling. A survey released on Monday by the Institute of Leadership & Management found that three quarters of women in business say there are barriers to them reaching senior management. This is in contrast to 38 percent of men who feel the same. Norway has had a strict quota law in place for the past three years, although the milder form of it was adopted in 2003. It stipulates that all publicly traded companies must have at least 40 percent women on their boards of directors. Any Norwegian company that didn’t comply with the law was threatened with dissolution. (In practice, those that chose not to comply simply took themselves private or moved their corporate headquarters to the UK.) France has enacted a similar law — minus the penalties. Disobedient French companies will simply get a slap on the corporate hand. That explains the comment (cited in the May 6, 2010 edition of The Economist ) of a senior French board member who said he would use a female candidate’s appearance as his primary selection criteria ahead of industry or other relevant experience. Similarly the Swiss CEO of Deutsche Bank, Josef Ackermann, recently came out in favor of putting more women on boards for their ability to make the board meetings ” prettier and more colorful .” Patronizing remarks like those are exactly the reason more forceful action needs to be taken. Companies won’t change unless someone forces them to do so — or, as Ines Kolmsee, CEO of chemical company SKW Metallurgie said, holds a ” Damocles Sword ” over their collective heads. A growing body of research from the likes of Catalyst , McKinsey & Company and others has shown that women on boards bring higher profits, higher quality earnings, better share price growth, better decisions and higher innovation. Moreover, Catalyst showed that companies with high numbers of women at the board level also end up with more women in senior management (compared to companies with male-dominated boards). So will the UK’s voluntary target proposal work? I doubt it. German companies instituted a similar “self-commitment” ten years ago. How’d they do? Last year executive women held just four of the 185 boardroom seats on the German DAX30 — a shameful 2.2 percent. At that glacial rate of change, perhaps our great-granddaughters will have a shot at true equality in the boardroom. Frankly, I think that German Families’ Minister Kristina Schröder has a far better solution: Like a quarterly earnings report, make companies publicly declare their own goals and timeline for getting women into senior management, and if they fail to achieve those targets, they must explain why. Coincidently, that’s also one of the Davies Report recommendations. Now that’s holding their feet to the fire! Cross-posted from Forbes.com

Read the full article →

Retail Watch: Best Buy To Cut Retail Space Growth by Going Smaller

February 22, 2011

Best Buy Co. Inc. plans to significantly cut the number of openings of its larger, standard-sized store format in favor of its smaller Best Buy Mobile stores. The Minneapolis-based electronics retailer also announced plans to improve efficiencies in its U.S. supply chain operations. “The actions we are taking are consistent with our strategy of driving businesses that have earned the right to additional capital while curtailing activities that…

Read the full article →

Retail Watch: Best Buy To Cut Retail Space Growth by Going Smaller

February 22, 2011

Best Buy Co. Inc. plans to significantly cut the number of openings of its larger, standard-sized store format in favor of its smaller Best Buy Mobile stores. The Minneapolis-based electronics retailer also announced plans to improve efficiencies in its U.S. supply chain operations. “The actions we are taking are consistent with our strategy of driving businesses that have earned the right to additional capital while curtailing activities that…

Read the full article →

The Curse Of Negative Equity

February 21, 2011

As more than $113 billion worth of home equity has vanished from South Florida’s housing market in the past five years, the number of homeowners with mortgages that are larger than the values of their properties has become enormous. More than 300,000 South Florida mortgages–or 43 percent of them–are currently underwater, the highest level in decades, if not ever. That’s about four times the number of homes in foreclosure.

Read the full article →

Saint Kitts and Nevis: Emerging luxury property market

February 21, 2011

The property market in the Federation of St Kitts and Nevis remains vigorous, as the number of air flights into the islands increases.

Read the full article →

Nake M. Kamrany: China’s Rapid Recovery in the Great Recession of 2007 – 2009

February 18, 2011

During the recession of 2007-2009 China’s exports dropped 15-18 percent causing 23 million workers to be laid off, but 98% readily found jobs as the economy bounced back and the unemployment rate dropped to 4% with a $586 billion stimulus package. The strategy was to create employment directly through fiscal means as President Roosevelt did during the Great Depression of the 1930s. In the great recession of 2007-2009, President Bush and Obama’s monetary stimulus have not reduced U.S. unemployment rate below 9% as of this date.. China is indeed back on track having 11.9 percent growth of GDP for the first quarter of 2010. It is now U.S.’s second largest trading partner, largest holder of U.S. public debt, is the number one producer of solar energy, second to the U.S. in energy consumption, is the biggest producer of greenhouse gasses, and the number one market for U.S. autos. China has a trade surplus with the U.S. in the amount of $238 billion. It intentionally keeps the value of its currency renminbi (yuan) low against the dollar to promote its favorable trade surplus. China has a de-facto G-2 partnership with the U.S. power sharing deal, The U.S. and China have common and divergent interests as China is becoming a global power house. China is holding $1.295 trillion of U.S. securities, an increase of 6.4 fold since 2002. China’s per capita income is $6,546 as compared to $40,208 for the U.S. The GDP is $9 trillion as compared to $14 trillion for the U.S.. If China’s economic performance continues at the same rate as in the last 30 years, its per capita income will converge with that of the U.S. by the year 2040 assuming it remains politically stable. China’s reform started in the 1980s just about in the same time as President Richard Nixon’s visit to China which opened the way for China’s incursion into international trade and economic growth. Since then, more than 250 million Chinese have been lifted out of poverty — a remarkable achievement. China’s system cannot be emulated by other nations because of its unique institutional framework, nor is it intending to export its system. Some of its leaders fear that adopting Western democracy may cause turbulence in society. Its main objective in dealing with foreign countries is economic opportunity, trade and development in a pragmatic way. Political leadership of a one-party system is elected every five years. China has a market authoritarian form of a system in which a free market is allowed to operate with the government holding a very firm hand on political activity in the country. Last year 10,000 small protests were tolerated. Currently over half of China’s GDP is produced by privately controlled enterprises. Currently China’s unemployment is at 4% by adopting a policy of employing labor into the factories in contrast to engaging private loans through micro-financing schemes as is prevalent in India and Latin America or through short term manipulation of the supply of money as being practiced in the U.S. Further, it is most notable that China escaped three global financial meltdowns since 1990 including the Japanese severe credit implosion, the developing Asian economies who suffered foreign reserve meltdown caused by money flight due to fixed exchange rate regimes and the 2007-2011 great recession that engulfed most of the world’s economy except China. The 2007-2011 great recessions were contagious and China’s strong globalization orientation was expected to push the Chinese economy into the transmittable and turbulent global meltdown, but ironically China escaped. Thus the Chinese rapid economic performance draws attention to the Western neoclassical synthesis concerning management of macroeconomic stability, macro/monetary policy and efficacy of countercyclical measures in the short run and in the long run. What is it that distinguishes China’s approach in contrast to the rest of the world? Essentially the Chinese performance suggests a reexamination of the received doctrine of mainstream macroeconomic paradigms in the West as the costs of the economic meltdown of 2007-2009 and on previous occasions point to the limitations of the existing remedies of macroeconomic and financial framework. Nake M. Kamrany is professor of economics and director of program in law and economics at the University of Southern California. This article is a synopsis of a chapter in the forthcoming book, “China After the Global Financial Crisis,” to be published by International Research Institute in November, 2011.

Read the full article →

Trish Kinney: Job Search Technology Not User Friendly to Employers

February 18, 2011

My company recently began a search for two managers and set up a nifty gmail account to house the responses. In a short period of time, hundreds of resumes came pouring in. Our vice president, who wrote and posted the ad, spent hours reviewing the submittals, setting up interviews, and meeting with perspective employees. She sent me her final two candidates, neither of which was suitable. In an emotional meeting, she stated that her workload did not allow her to repeat the frustrating and time consuming process, complained about the quality of the applicants, and seemed nearly certain that one of them was a murder suspect she had seen on the television news. I offered to take over the search for the two managers. Having personally hired hundreds of people over the past 28 years, I approached the task with confidence. By the time I accessed the swelling gmail account, there were 921 responses. It was daunting to make that first click and absolutely overwhelming to consider such a large number of applicants. After my first session, a handful of resumes were saved in a folder and approximately 215 were reviewed and discarded. Hours later, I was down to 700 applicants. I found myself looking for any excuse to avoid the process completely, willing to spend time doing anything but throwing myself into the black hole of click after click on resumes that included air conditioning techs, hospital clerks, cashiers, sushi chefs and journalists. Not one included a cover letter stating why, despite their lack of related experience, they were applying for a community manager position and what special talents they could bring to my company. It was clear that a lot of clicking was going on from their end, utilizing software that allowed their resumes to be blasted to any and every job posting on the site. The old adage about throwing spaghetti against the wall and seeing what sticks came to mind. Many of the responses were barely in the form of resumes. My favorite so far is: “Worked in a high paced,large volumes of wealthy and distinguished clientel! Professional attititude and conduct is what i am all about, I work very hard and thoroughly ,i am an efficiency expert!I am creatative ,outgoing very articulate, a team player!” Finally I went to my folder and selected one candidate and dialed his number. He was overqualified for the job but his resume was beautifully done and his vast experience was at least indirectly related to our industry. We spoke on the phone for nearly 40 minutes and he was an impressive candidate. I reiterated, as was stated in the ad, that it was an entry level management position with tremendous potential for rapid growth within the company. While I knew he was overqualified, we would have to both agree to take a chance on the other and see if we were a good match. He said he had enjoyed every minute of our discussion and we scheduled an interview at my office. I recklessly stopped looking at the resumes after that, feeling confident I had found my manager. During the interview, I offered the job at the high end of the salary range posted in the ad to which he had responded. He seemed shocked at the number and it completely changed the tone of the interview. It suddenly dawned on me that he had no idea which job he was applying for because he had forwarded his resume so many times by repeated box clicking. For a moment I drifted off in my mind to the days when resumes were received in the US mail with beautifully drafted cover letters and crisp, well organized resumes for consideration or dropped off in person by people dressed in business clothes with briefcases or leather notebooks under their arms. A good response was maybe 30 applicants with direct experience and the hard part was which qualified candidate was the best fit. He asked if he could think about it overnight and promised to get back to me this morning. I think it’s even money as to whether he can even imagine coming to work for that kind of money when he made so much more in a position that no longer exists in today’s economy. All I know is that it seems backwards to me that the employer has to do all the work in the hiring process and the job seekers have only to click, click, click to circulate their resumes anywhere and everywhere, sometimes without even reading the entire job description. It dilutes the process for both sides which is a real shame with unemployment being what it is today. I honestly feel that I would seriously considered any applicant, literally, who takes the time to write a personalized cover letter to my job posting showing at least minimal interest in my needs. But so far, not one resume has included such a letter. What seems perfectly clear to me is that resumes flying around internet space does not a legitimate job search make. A small effort to make yourself stand out to an employer would be worth it. And don’t worry, you won’t have to leave your computer to do it.

Read the full article →

3 More Banks Shuttered, 14 Failures Already In 2011

February 5, 2011

WASHINGTON — Regulators on Friday shut down three small banks in Georgia and Illinois, bringing to 14 the number of bank failures in 2011 following last year’s tally of 157 amid the sagging economy and mounting bad loans. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. seized American Trust Bank, based in Roswell, Ga., with $238.2 million in assets and $222.2 million in deposits; North Georgia Bank of Watkinsville, Ga., with $153.2 million in assets and $139.7 million in deposits; and Chicago-based Community First Bank, with $51.1 million in assets and $49.5 million in deposits. Renasant Bank, based in Tupelo, Miss., agreed to assume $147.4 million of the assets and all the deposits of American Trust Bank. BankSouth, based in Greensboro, Ga., is assuming $123.9 million of the assets and all the deposits of North Georgia Bank. Northbrook Bank and Trust Co., based in Northbrook, Ill., is acquiring the assets and deposits of Community First Bank. In addition, the FDIC and Renasant Bank agreed to share losses on $94.3 million of American Trust Bank’s loans and other assets. The FDIC and BankSouth are sharing losses on $120.1 million of North Georgia Bank’s assets. The agency and Northbrook Bank and Trust are sharing losses on $42.8 million of Community First Bank’s assets. The failure of American Trust Bank is expected to cost the deposit insurance fund $71.5 million. The failure of North Georgia Bank is expected to cost $35.2 million; that of Northbrook Bank and Trust, $11.7 million. The two Georgia banks brought the number of failures in that state this year to four. Georgia has been one of the hardest-hit states for bank failures amid an avalanche of bad loans – especially for commercial real estate. Twenty-one banks were shuttered in the state last year. Other states that have seen large numbers of bank failures are Florida, California and Illinois. The 157 bank closures nationwide last year topped the 140 shuttered in 2009. It was the most in a year since the savings-and-loan crisis two decades ago. The FDIC has said that 2010 likely would be the peak for bank failures. Already this year the pace of closures has slowed: By this time last year, regulators had closed 16 banks. The 2009 failures cost the insurance fund about $36 billion. The failures last year cost around $21 billion, a lower price tag because the banks that failed in 2010 were on average smaller. Twenty-five banks failed in 2008, the year the financial crisis struck with force; only three succumbed in 2007. The growing number of bank failures has sapped billions of dollars out of the deposit insurance fund. It fell into the red in 2009, and its deficit stood at $8 billion as of Sept. 30. The number of banks on the FDIC’s confidential “problem” list rose to 860 in the third quarter of last year from 829 three months earlier. The 860 troubled banks is the highest number since 1993, during the savings-and-loan crisis. The FDIC expects the cost of resolving failed banks to total around $52 billion from 2010 through 2014. Depositors’ money – insured up to $250,000 per account – is not at risk, with the FDIC backed by the government. That insurance cap was made permanent in the financial overhaul law enacted in July.

Read the full article →

10 Ways Wall Street Crushes Retail Investors

January 26, 2011

In the late 1990′s and early 2000′s, the number of individual investors surged thanks to the rise of the Internet. As information became instant and ubiquitous, and the fees associated with making trades decreased, people took advantage of their ability to do their own research and retail trading peaked.

Read the full article →

FDIC Closes 4 Small Banks, Bringing 2011 Failures To 7

January 22, 2011

WASHINGTON (Reuters) – U.S. authorities closed four banks — one in Denver and three in the U.S. Southeast — on Friday with total assets of $2.7 billion, bringing the number of failures in 2011 so far to seven. The pace of bank failures is expected to decrease in 2011 as the economy recovers and the impact of the 2007-2009 financial crisis fades. In 2010, 157 banks failed, following 140 failures in 2009. FDIC Chairman Sheila Bair has said the agency expects the number of failures to drop in 2011. “You will still have elevated bank failures in 2011 but based on our current projections it will be significantly lower than what we had last year,” she said on Jan. 13. Smaller banks, those with less than a billion dollars in assets, continue to struggle and have made up the bulk of recent closures. Many are having trouble dealing with the sluggish real estate market, particularly its effect on loans they made for commercial property. The FDIC announced the following closures on Friday: * United Western Bank (UWB.BO), of Denver. It had assets of $2.05 billion. First Citizens Bank & Trust Company (FCNCA.O), of Raleigh, North Carolina, will assume the deposits. United Western Bank had eight branches, including in Boulder and Fort Collins. First Citizens already had three branches in the Denver area operated by its IronStone Bank division. First Citizens has purchased assets of four other banks, in Florida, California and Washington state, in the past 18 months. * CommunitySouth Bank and Trust, of Easley, South Carolina. Had $440.6 million in assets. CertusBank, National Association, of Easley, South Carolina, a newly-chartered bank subsidiary of Blue Ridge Holdings Inc, Charlotte, North Carolina, assumed the deposits. * Bank of Asheville, North Carolina. It had assets of $195.1 million. First Bank, Troy, North Carolina, to assume the deposits. * Enterprise Banking Company, of McDonough, Georgia. It had assets of $100.9 million. FDIC created Deposit Insurance National Bank of McDonough, which will remain open until Jan. 28, to allow depositors access to insured deposits and time to open accounts elsewhere. On Nov. 23 the FDIC released its latest quarterly report on the state of the banking industry. It showed that the industry overall continues to recover from the financial crisis but that large banks are doing better than smaller institutions. The net income for the banking industry was $14.5 billion for the third quarter, which compares to $21.4 billion in the second quarter and $2 billion in the third quarter of 2009, according to the FDIC. The agency said that third-quarter earnings would have reached a three-year high had it not been for a $10.4 billion goodwill charge taken by Bank of America (BAC.N) during the quarter for its card business. The banking industry has been setting aside less money to guard against losses, helping to boost earnings in recent quarters. Bair has cautioned against banks reducing these reserves too quickly given the state of the economy. Despite the improving revenue numbers for the industry as a whole, community banks continue to be hit hard by the weak economy and the amount of bad loans on their books, particularly in the commercial real estate sector. For instance, the number of banks on the agency’s “problem list” grew to 860 from 829, to reach the highest number since March of 1993 when there were 928 institutions on the list. Most of these institutions will not fail but the list provides an indication of how many banks are struggling. (Reporting by Charles Abbott; Editing by Tim Dobbyn, Bernard Orr) Copyright 2010 Thomson Reuters. Click for Restrictions .

Read the full article →

Robert Reich: American Competitiveness, and the President’s New Relationship with American Business

January 22, 2011

Whenever you hear a business executive or politician use the term “American competitiveness,” watch your wallet. Few terms in public discourse have gone so directly from obscurity to meaninglessness without any intervening period of coherence. President Obama just appointed Jeffry Immelt, GE’s CEO, to head his outside panel of economic advisors, replacing Paul Volcker. According to White House spokesman Robert Gibbs, Immelt has “agreed to work through what makes our country more competitive.” In an opinion piece for the Washington Post announcing his acceptance, Immelt wrote “there is nothing inevitable about America’s declining manufacturing competitiveness if we work together to reverse it.” But what’s American “competitiveness” and how do you measure it? Here are some different definitions: It’s American exports. Okay, but the easiest way for American companies to increase their exports from the US is for their American-made products to become cheaper internationally. And for them to reduce the price of their American-made stuff they have to cut their costs of production in here. Their biggest cost is their payrolls. So it follows that the simplest way for them to become more “competitive” is to cut their payrolls — either by substituting software and automated machinery for their US workers, or getting (or forcing) their US workers to accept wage and benefit cuts. It’s net exports. Another way to think about American “competitiveness” is the balance of trade — how much we import from abroad versus how much they import from us. The easiest and most direct way to improve the trade balance is to coax the value of the dollar down relative to foreign currencies (the Fed’s current strategy for flooding the economy with money could have this effect). The result is everything we make becomes cheaper to the rest of the world. But even if other nations were willing to let this happen (doubtful; we’d probably have a currency war instead as they tried to coax down the value of their currencies in response), we’d pay a high price. Everything the rest of the world makes would become more expensive for us. It’s the profits of American-based companies. In case you haven’t noticed, the profits of American corporations are soaring. That’s largely because sales from their foreign-based operations are booming (especially in China, Brazil, and India). It’s also because they’ve cut their costs of production in the US (see the first item above). American-based companies have become global — making and selling all over the world — so their profitability has little or nothing to do with the number and quality of jobs here in the US. In fact, it may be inversely related. It’s the number and quality of American jobs. This is my preferred definition, but on this measure we’re doing terribly badly. Most Americans are imprisoned in a terrible trade-off — they can get a job, but only one that pays considerably less than the one they used to have, or they can face unemployment or insecure contract work. The only sure way to improve the quality of jobs over the long term is to build the productivity of American workers and the US overall, which means major investments in education, infrastructure, and basic R&D. But it’s far from clear American corporations and their executives will pay the taxes needed to make these investments. And the only sure way to improve the number of jobs is to give the vast middle and working classes of America sufficient purchasing power to get the economy going again. But here again, it’s far from clear American corporations and their executives will be willing to push for a more progressive tax code, along with wage subsidies, that would put more money into average workers’ pockets. It’s politically important for President Obama, as for any president, to be available to American business, and to avoid the moniker of being “anti-business.” But the president must not be seduced into believing — and must not allow the public to be similarly seduced into thinking — that the well-being of American business is synonymous with the well-being of Americans. Robert Reich is the author of Aftershock: The Next Economy and America’s Future , now in bookstores. This post originally appeared at RobertReich.org .

Read the full article →

Audrey Watters: Update to Higher Ed Classification System Shows Huge Growth in Private, For-Profit Institutions

January 20, 2011

The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching released an update to its classification system today, a revision to one of the leading frameworks for describing institutional diversity in U.S. higher education. The update finds two “striking changes” in higher ed: a dramatic increase in private, for-profit institutions and an increase in institutions whose programs focus on professional fields like business and health. The Carnegie Classification offers researchers a standardized way to describe and compare institutions. The system represents some of the main differences between colleges and universities in the U.S, monitoring things like undergraduate and graduate programs offered, enrollment profiles, and school size and setting. The classification framework was originally published in 1973 and was last updated in 2005. The update released today includes the most recent national data. According to Chun-Mei Zhao, the project’s director, more schools are offering professional programs at both the undergraduate and graduate level that are “less selective and non residential.” She says this trend has been “triggered by the growth of the private, for-profit sector” and adds that “this suggests that the higher education landscape is shifting further away from the traditional model of the liberal arts college.” Since its last update, 483 newly classified institutions have been added (bringing the total to 4633). 77% of these are private, for-profit institutions. On the contrary, the growth in public and private, not-for-profit institutions has been small, only 4% and 19% of the newly classified schools respectively. The classification framework also points to the increase in the number of what it calls “professional focus” institutions — schools that award more than 60% of their degrees in professional fields. The number of institutions that grant more than 60% of their degrees in arts and sciences, on the other hand, fell by 5%. Health profession programs increased by 6% at both for-profit and not-for-profit institutions. Business and management programs increased by roughly the same percentage, but the growth was almost entirely at for-profit schools. Also notable in today’s figures: substantial growth in the number of traditional two-year colleges, as well as the number of two-year colleges starting to offer bachelor’s degrees. The Chronicle of Higher Education suggests that the growth of for-profit schools might be slightly exaggerated by the Carnegie Classification lists the individual campuses of the University of Phoenix, ITT Technical Institute, DeVry University and the like as separate institutions. The Chronicle cites at least one university official who’s “cool” on the significance of the new numbers, contending that the growth in the number of these private, for-profit institutions may be a question of supply, but not necessarily demand. Indeed, recent enrollment figures from the University of Phoenix revealed a 40% drop in enrollment in the last quarter of 2010.

Read the full article →

Rick Smolan Elected to Democrasoft Board

January 19, 2011

SANTA ROSA, CA–(Marketwire – January 19, 2011) –  Democrasoft, Inc. ( PINKSHEETS : DEMO ) today announced that New York and Sausalito-based entrepreneur, publisher and photographer Rick Smolan has been elected to its Board of Directors, bringing the number of directors to five.

Read the full article →

People Are Moving Again

January 13, 2011

While data compiled in the 2010 Census suggests that long-distance moves hit a record low, more recent data indicates, Americans seem to be on the move again. In 2010, Atlas Van Lines saw increases in the number of household moves, a possible sign that the economy is improving, according to its annual Migration Patterns study. “The results are especially promising this year, as the number of moves has increased, with monthly numbers higher than…

Read the full article →

Video: U.K. Constructors Build Homes for Rent as Demand Rises

December 23, 2010

Dec. 23 (Bloomberg) — Bloomberg’s Poppy Trowbridge reports on an increase in the number of Britons renting homes instead of buying, spurring constructors to build more homes for rental rather than sale.

Read the full article →

In Obama Anti-Foreclosure Program, Thousands Of Homeowners Strung Along For A Year

December 21, 2010

More than 29,000 troubled American homeowners have been stuck in mortgage modification purgatory for at least a year, with no end in sight, under the Obama administration’s anti-foreclosure program, according to a recently released report from a watchdog panel appointed by Congress. These homeowners were supposed to receive lower payments on a trial basis lasting three months and then gain so-called permanent mortgage modifications–lowered payments lasting five years. But more than a year after beginning their trial phase, they have yet to be granted the permanent relief, leaving them unsure about their ability to hang on to their homes. Meanwhile their lenders continue to report them to credit bureaus as delinquent, impairing their ability to borrow in the future. The new data, disclosed last week in a report from the Congressional Oversight Panel, added the latest sign of trouble to an anti-foreclosure program that was once supposed to help 3 to 4 million hang on to their homes. It is now on track to aid less than one-fourth that number. The homeowners stuck waiting for permanent relief now contend with a higher cost of living thanks to lower credit scores and higher mortgage debt. They’re also prevented from moving on as they try to keep a mortgage teetering on the verge of foreclosure. “It’s horrifying, but it’s not surprising,” said Diane E. Thompson, counsel to the National Consumer Law Center. “I hear about this everyday from people. When I go out to do trainings, I have people put their hands up in the room and I try to think of prizes for the person who has the oldest trial mod, and they’re routinely 18 months old.” Twenty-eight homeowners who entered the program in March 2009, or more than a year-and-a-half ago, remain in the trial phase. Some 475 have been in trial limbo for 18 months. More than 29,100 borrowers have been stuck in the trial phase for at least a year, data through October show. “After promises of hope, the fact that so many families remain in financial limbo goes to the heart of our biggest concern: some mortgage servicers on their own simply seem not to be up to the task of effective, widespread mortgage modification,” said Richard H. Neiman, New York’s top bank regulator and a member of the oversight panel. Neiman added that “Treasury has not been able to hold them fully accountable.” While the Treasury Department discloses the number of homeowners who have been in the trial program for at least six months, Treasury has never revealed the number of borrowers who have been in the trial phase for at least a year. Bank of America, the nation’s largest bank by assets, accounted for nearly half of all the aged trials, according to Treasury’s latest publicly-released scorecard. Thompson said the number of homeowners stuck in limbo is likely much higher as mortgage firms self-report their data to Treasury, and are likely to skew the numbers in their favor. The modification initiative, known as HAMP, long ago was dismissed by housing experts as a failure. More homeowners have been bounced from the program than have received permanent relief. The average borrower lucky enough to get into a five-year plan ends up owing more on their mortgage than they did prior to entering the program. Research shows that homeowners in this state, known as being underwater, are less likely to move–such as in pursuit of a job–and more likely to default. And more than a third of those in so-called permanent mortgages spend more than 80 percent of their monthly income servicing debt, raising questions about the long-term sustainability of the modifications. The oversight panel said HAMP would prevent less than 800,000 foreclosure, at a cost of about $4 billion. The administration originally allocated $50 billion in bailout funds to help homeowners. Last week, the Treasury Department official overseeing its bailout programs admitted for the first time that the mortgage modification initiative will not meet the goal laid out by President Obama when he announced the program in February 2009. Then, Obama said it would enable “as many as 3 to 4 million homeowners to modify the terms of their mortgages to avoid foreclosure.” “I think it’s apparent from our numbers that we will not have 3 to 4 million” permanent modifications, said Tim Massad, Treasury’s acting assistant secretary for financial stability. More than 2.8 homes received foreclosure notices last year, according to real estate data provider RealtyTrac. The Federal Reserve expects 7.4 million homes to enter foreclosure this year through 2012. It recently revised its projection up from 6.5 million as the crisis has worsened. Treasury officials say the program’s shortcomings are due to mortgage firms’ inability to handle the huge influx of distressed borrowers that flooded the system when the housing market soured; the changing nature of the housing crisis, which was once dominated by subprime mortgages and now remains depressed due to a lingering high unemployment rate; and borrowers’ lack of maintaining proper documentation describing their circumstances, like monthly income. To deal with the borrower issue, Treasury redesigned the program to require documentation in order to enter the trial phase, rather than the previous practice of rushing to get homeowners enrolled in the program and asking for their paperwork later. Treasury maintains that this has led to better results. But according to the oversight panel’s data, nearly 30 percent of borrowers who made their first trial payment in June–and made their payments on time in July, August and September–remain in the trial phase. A little more than half actually converted into a permanent modification, making it the only month dating to March 2009 in which the conversion rate eclipsed 50 percent, data show. Andrea Risotto, a Treasury Department spokeswoman, cautioned that there is some lag between when a decision on a permanent modification is reached and when that is entered into the system. Still, Treasury officials argue that even with homeowners remaining in limbo, they’re still benefitting from the program as they’re able to continue living in their homes, at a reduced rate, and without cost to taxpayers (the initiative only pays for permanent modifications). “The trial period provides immediate relief to struggling homeowners at no expense to taxpayers,” Risotto wrote in an e-mail. She added that Treasury data show that a majority of borrowers rejected during the trial phase end up in alternative foreclosure-prevention programs. Thompson, who works with homeowners and their advocates, completely disagreed. “The big overarching thing is, nobody wants to be in a trial mod. Everyone wants resolution in their lives,” she said. “Everyone in foreclosure is desperate to get out of foreclosure. It’s incredibly stressful, it’s humiliating, and shameful. Nobody feels good about it. People want it done, they want it over with, they want to be able to move on.” Also, even though the homeowners are making their payments, they’re still being reported as delinquent to the major credit reporting bureaus, Thompson said. “So think about what that does when they go to apply for a car, or what it does to their credit card rates, or if they’re applying for a job, or want to move, or even want to rent a place,” she said. “It affects their cost of living and their ability to manage their life in all sorts of ways. Credit is a huge issue.” Finally, when homeowners are in the trial phase their mortgage company tacks on to their mortgage principal the difference between their old monthly payment and the reduced amount. The longer the trial, the more gets added. Thompson said that for some of these homeowners, that tacked-on amount is enough to tip the scales against a permanent modification when their mortgage company finally decides to run the formula that determines whether they keep their home, or are forced out. A bigger debt load works against homeowners, she added. “This is not a good deal for homeowners.” ************************* Shahien Nasiripour is a business reporter for The Huffington Post. You can send him an e-mail ; bookmark his page ; subscribe to his RSS feed ; follow him on Twitter ; friend him on Facebook ; become a fan ; and/or get e-mail alerts when he reports the latest news. He can be reached at 646-274-2455.

Read the full article →

Conihasset Capital Partners Announces Addition to Its Board of Directors

December 14, 2010

BOSTON, MA–(Marketwire – December 14, 2010) – Conihasset Capital Partners, Inc. ( PINKSHEETS : CNHA ) (the “Company”) has announced that Paul W. Stephenson has been elected as an independent member of its Board of Directors (the “Board”). The election of Mr. Stephenson brings the number of directors of the Company to five, three of whom are independent directors.

Read the full article →

Conihasset Capital Partners Announces Addition to Its Board of Directors

December 14, 2010

BOSTON, MA–(Marketwire – December 14, 2010) – Conihasset Capital Partners, Inc. ( PINKSHEETS : CNHA ) (the “Company”) has announced that Paul W. Stephenson has been elected as an independent member of its Board of Directors (the “Board”). The election of Mr. Stephenson brings the number of directors of the Company to five, three of whom are independent directors.

Read the full article →

Predict The Unemployment Rate! What Will October’s Numbers Show?

November 4, 2010

Will America’s unemployment rate finally budge from 9.6 percent? Time to play the guessing game. Gallup puts the number between 9.7 and 9.9 percent, which seems like a fairly safe range. Reuters reports that the consensus is that the U.S. economy will add jobs for the first time in since May — thanks to a decline in Census layoffs — and projects that unemployment rate will hold firm at 9.6 percent. What do you think?

Read the full article →

John Harrington: Don’t Worry About The Bedbugs — Eliminate the Financial Parasites

October 27, 2010

Growing up in rural East Texas, I thought I knew what poverty looked like — I certainly didn’t know what it cost. You don’t unless you are locked in with few ways out and preyed upon by check cashers, payday lenders, pawnshops and rent-to-own bandits. One doesn’t need to read Gary Rivlin’s Broke USA: From Pawnshops To Poverty, Inc. — How The Working Poor Became Big Business /em> to be educated about how expensive being poor in America can be — just walk into the Fruitvale or West Oakland neighborhoods of Oakland, California, in the San Francisco Bay Area. Or, you can walk down Mission Street in the Mission District or on Market Street in San Francisco and see lots of people lined up in front of payday lenders and check cashers on almost every corner. They are also in almost every American city and accounted for over $113 billion in business nationally in 2007, including check cashing, payday loans, money orders, and money wiring. All told, $1.6 billion each year of interest, excessive fees, and other exorbitant costs are being charged to poor people every single day, making it almost physically and fiscally impossible for individuals to exit the poverty cycle. Most often, minorities and immigrants, as well as poor whites, are all locked in a financial roundabout in which there is no escape. Today, the number of private check cashers, payday lenders and pawnshops is more than double the number of McDonald’s franchises in the United States. More than 20 million Americans cash more than $60 billion in checks each year at check cashing businesses. Full time workers without a checking account typically pay $40 on average to cash paychecks, while payday lenders sell an additional $40 billion in expensive small-dollar ($300 maximum in California, but higher in other states) loans each year that carry fees 30 times the average credit card rate. Dan Leibsohn, founder and former Executive Director of the Low Income Investment Fund (formerly the Low Income Housing Fund) may have figured out a way for communities to challenge this bottom-feeding capitalism. Leibsohn’s present non-profit, Community Development Finance (CDF), has created a competitive non-profit community check cashing business in the Fruitvale neighborhood of Oakland, which for 16 months has been cutting check cashing costs to about one-third or less compared to other check cashing stores and is now making payday loans at half of the cost that the private sector parasite competitors charge. The non-profit check cashing business is close to being sustainable and is saving the community at an annual rate of over $125,000 in fees. By the end of the year, this savings may exceed an annual rate of $175,000. CDF’s program includes financial coaching and literacy training to assist low income households to increase wealth-building capacity and break the crisis mode of a never-ending need for a financial “fix” at the pay window of a private sector payday lender. Leibsohn calls the financial “habit” a much more personal vicious cycle than drug addiction. In addition, CDF is offering small business services, ties to banks and credit unions, and social service assistance to help people move into the financial mainstream while reducing excessively expensive financial services costs. CDF’s next major task is to increase payday loan accessibility, continue to cut fees for its services, and expand its coaching and other assistance, as well as expand the model beyond Oakland. Community Check Cashing opened in May 2009, right in the middle of the Great Recession, with the help of initial grants from both of the Haas Foundations, Rosenberg, and Casey Foundations. Leibsohn also recently received an award from the Federal Home Loan Bank’s AHEAD program. It now serves perhaps 700 to 800 people in the neighborhood that need access to inexpensive financial capital and hopes to reach 1,000 households soon. CDF’s board believes that the Fruitvale model, or variations of this approach, can be successfully replicated in numerous neighborhoods across the country, but first it needs to prove that low-cost check cashing and inexpensive payday loans administered by non-profit community-based organizations can be sustainable following initial donor support. Dan Leibsohn worked for over six years to write a comprehensive business plan, and now needs a few more months and continued community support to make a once viewed long-shot a reality. Once that occurs, CDF would still need annual infusions of support to pay for the non-revenue producing activities. CDF can be reached at (510) 479-1037 and is near the Fruitvale BART station in Oakland. John Harrington is a CDF board member and contributor and a Registered Investment Advisor in Northern California.

Read the full article →

ProPublica: Treasury’s Incredible Shrinking Mortgage Mod Program

October 27, 2010

By Karen Weise , ProPublica . The U.S. government’s effort to help struggling homeowners is approaching a standstill, and the number of homeowners in ongoing mortgage modifications could start shrinking in several months if current trends continue, according to a ProPublica analysis of Treasury Department data. A year and a half into the program, the number of homeowners defaulting on their modified loans has been fast approaching the number of new modifications. In September, for example, banks modified almost 28,000 loans, but nearly 10,000 homeowners fell out of the program because they defaulted on their modified payments. Taken together, the programs’ growth has slowed by almost a quarter each month since May. The administration launched its foreclosure-relief effort last spring, looking to help 3 to 4 million homeowners by modifying their mortgages to have affordable monthly payments. Only 467,000 homeowners are in modifications that are still ongoing. Alan White, a law professor at Valparaiso University, said the problem isn’t the rate at which homeowners are redefaulting, which is low compared to other modifications, but rather the shrinking number of new modifications given out by banks. “We need to be modifying 10 times as many a month,” he told us. Across the country, over 5 million mortgages are more than 60 days overdue or in foreclosure, according to Lender Processing Services. Banks have had a poor record of modifying mortgages under the government program. (Check out our graphical breakdown of each bank’s performance.) Homeowners report Kafka-esque experiences of lost paperwork , miscommunication and dashed hopes in trying to get help preventing foreclosures. We’ve recently chronicled homeowner experiences in a series of profiles and a questionnaire . Investors who own mortgages are dismayed as well. The Treasury Department has yet to penalize a single mortgage servicer since the program launched last spring. “You start with a program that’s not well designed and a lack of will to enforce the program, and this is what you’re getting,” says White. The pipeline for permanent modifications also continues to dwindle. There are now fewer than 175,000 active trial modifications, down from almost 260,000 in July. Nearly half of the active trials are at least six months old. We contacted Treasury to ask about the slowing of the program, and they haven’t responded yet. We’ll update this post when we hear back. Two mortgage servicers, Bank of America and Aurora, have seen their numbers of active permanent modifications decrease in the past month. Bank of America’s dropped by about a thousand modifications, and Aurora’s fell by over 2,500 modifications. In a press release , Bank of America said that the drop came from a combination of defaulted modifications, servicing transfers and repaid mortgages. Only 428 mortgages have been repaid to the more than 100 mortgage servicers participating in the federal program. Aurora did not respond to ProPublica’s request to comment. Update: Treasury said it is working to reach as many eligible homeowners as it can and has expanded alternative options for borrowers that do not qualify for the modification program. ProPublica is America’s largest investigative newsroom. Sign up for our daily email here .

Read the full article →

Bluesocket Announces Appointment of Industry Veteran Chris Koeneman as Vice President of Worldwide Sales and Marketing

October 25, 2010

BOSTON, MA–(Marketwire – October 25, 2010) –  Bluesocket announces the appointment of industry veteran Chris Koeneman as Vice President of Worldwide Sales and Marketing. Chris Koeneman further strengthens the leadership team of the company, as Bluesocket continues to lead the market as the number one supplier of virtual wireless LAN networking.

Read the full article →

Northern States Financial Corporation Appoints Charles William Smith to Board of Directors

October 21, 2010

WAUKEGAN, IL–(Marketwire – October 21, 2010) –  Northern States Financial Corporation ( NASDAQ : NSFC ), holding company for NorStates Bank, a FDIC-insured financial institution, today announced that Charles William Smith has been appointed as a director of the Company to serve until the next annual meeting of stockholders. The addition of Mr. Smith to the Board of Directors of the Company increases the number of directors to ten members. Mr. Smith will also serve as a director of NorStates Bank.

Read the full article →

Poverty In Suburbs Increasing Rapidly During Economic Downturn

October 17, 2010

WASHINGTON — The American suburb is no longer a refuge from poverty in cities. A pair of analyses by the nonprofit Brookings Institution paints a bleak economic picture for the 100 largest metropolitan areas over the past decade and in coming years, and finds that suburbs now are home to one-third of the nation’s poor, and rising. The study of census data finds that since 2000, the number of poor people in the suburbs jumped by 37.4 percent to 13.7 million. The growth rate of suburban poverty is more than double that of cities and higher than the national rate of 26.5 percent. At the same time, social service providers are spread thin in many suburban areas, according to a detailed Brookings survey of groups in representative metropolitan areas of Chicago, Los Angeles and the District of Columbia. That has forced providers to turn away many poor people due to scarce aid that typically goes to cities first. “Millions of Americans at all income levels moved to the suburbs looking for better schools, better jobs, affordable housing, and a sense of security, but in recent years, as incomes have fallen, people had a harder and harder time making ends meet,” said Scott Allard, a University of Chicago professor who co-wrote one of the reports. “As a result, Americans who never imagined becoming poor are now asking for assistance, and many are not getting the help they need.” After the recession began in 2007, the suburbs continued to post larger increases in the number of poor – adding 1.8 million, compared with 1.4 million in the cities. The findings come weeks before the Nov. 2 congressional elections in which voters anxious over the economy will decide whether to keep Democrats in power. Made up of both cities and surrounding suburbs, the large metro areas represent two-thirds of the U.S. population and are home to battlegrounds that helped lift Democrat Barack Obama to victory in 2008. Cities still have higher poverty rates – about 19.5 percent, compared with 10.4 percent in the suburbs. But the gap has been steadily narrowing. In a reversal from 2000, the number of poor people living in the suburbs now exceeds those in cities by roughly 1.6 million. Analysts attribute the shift largely to years of middle-class flight and substantial shares of minorities and immigrants leaving cities in the early part of the decade for affordable housing and job opportunities in the suburbs. After the housing bust, their fortunes changed, throwing millions out of work. More than half, or 57, of the 100 largest U.S. metro areas had substantial increases in poverty. They were most evident in Sun Belt suburban areas including Modesto and Riverside, both in California, as well as the Florida cities of Lakeland, Orlando, Miami and Tampa, which had seen large population gains during the housing boom. Also hit hard were Rust Belt manufacturing regions such as Detroit, Cleveland and Allentown, Pa., where the poverty rate soared to 29 percent from 19 percent. Nationally, the government reported last month that 14.3 percent of people in the U.S., or 1 in 7, now live below the poverty line, which is $21,954 for a family of four. Among the working-age population, poverty is at 12.9 percent, the highest since the 1960s, when the government launched a campaign against poverty. Based on unemployment rates that remain near 10 percent, many analysts predict increases in the U.S. poverty rate for at least two more years, with suburbs continuing to struggle. Additional findings: _Poor people’s requests to nonprofit groups for help buying food, paying bills and making housing payments generally jumped 30 percent between 2008 and 2009. About 3 out of 4 nonprofit groups reported more requests from people who had never sought help before. _Almost half of the nonprofit groups serving the suburban poor reported they had lost substantial government or private-sector aid in the last year. Many of them were expecting additional cuts in 2011. _Suburban nonprofit groups were often spread across multiple counties, cities or townships. That made it difficult to coordinate services across sprawling areas or obtain money, compared with cities where poverty was more concentrated. _Private philanthropic support for nonprofit social service groups more often helped the poor in cities than in suburbs, due partly to a belief that cities needed more help. Elizabeth Kneebone, a senior research associate at the Brookings Institution, said the numbers highlighted a need for local governments to develop regional approaches to tackling poverty that encompass both city and suburb. While suburban poverty is a growing problem, Kneebone noted that city poverty also rose significantly in the last year as the downturn spread from construction and manufacturing to other sectors. She said future poverty increases will be partly determined by the pace of economic recovery as well as government policy decisions promoting job growth, affordable housing and transportation.

Read the full article →

US Home Values Seen Losing 17T Mortgage Rates Increase

October 12, 2010

Home values in the US are projected to drop by over 17 trillion this year due to continued increases in the number of foreclosures and expiring tax credits for homebuyers according to Bloomberg

Read the full article →

Bob Burnett: The Jobs Crisis: Hard Times and Tough Choices

October 8, 2010

Here in California, I’ve been calling voters, asking them to vote no on Proposition 23 — the Texas Oil attempt to roll back our enlightened environmental law (AB32). I’ve been impressed both by voters’ determination to defeat Proposition 23 and their reports of hard times. Many voters say they are hurting financially. It doesn’t come as a surprise. The Bureau of Labor Statistics reports that the U.S. unemployment rate is holding at 9.6 percent. But when you add the number of “discouraged” workers, who’ve quit looking for employment, and the number of who are working part time because they can’t find full time work, the total number of unemployed and underemployed rises to 16 percent. And that’s probably low considering the number of people who are stuck in jobs they hate but are afraid to leave — not to mention the number of folks who put in long hours but don’t earn a living wage. Last month the National Bureau of Economic Research declared that “the great recession” ended in June of 2009. Most Americans find that hard to believe when hard times continue. Indeed, financial guru Warren Buffett observed: “We’re still in a recession… We’re not gonna be out of it for a while…” Buffett defines a recession differently from the National Bureau of Economic Research, saying it ends “when real per capita gross domestic product returns to its pre-downturn level.” What Buffet didn’t say is that no one can predict when real per capital gross domestic product will rebound. Berkeley economist Robert Reich believes that during the Bush Administration ordinary consumers lost such a high percentage of their buying power that they no longer have the capacity to pull the U.S. out of the recession. (Columbia economist Joseph Stiglitz agrees.) This long-lasting recession has had four consequences: high unemployment and a steady loss of decent jobs; low-interest rates; savage restriction of credit; and rising income inequality . The gap between rich and poor Americans is increasing and the middle class is wasting away. As a consequence, ordinary consumers have less discretionary income. The U.S. economy depends upon steady consumption by working-class Americans. Conservative economic theory incorrectly assumes that rich folks buying yachts and vacation homes catalyze the consumer economy. That’s not happening; wealthy Americans have as much income as they have ever had but their purchases of Ferraris or diamonds aren’t boosting the economy. Average Americans aren’t consuming because they either don’t have the money or are saving it because they are fearful. Working folks aren’t consuming so businesses aren’t hiring. It’s an understandable but deadly cycle. There’s a fundamental loss of trust. That’s why Americans are depressed. Once upon a time, Americans prided themselves on their “can do” attitude. We shared the belief that no matter how difficult the problem we could solve it by banding together. That’s the spirit that prevailed during World War II when America united to defeat the Axis powers. And that same spirit is still seen in communities wherever there’s a hurricane or earthquake or horrific fire; we still have the capacity to form the “benevolent community” that works for the common good. Unfortunately, as regards the jobs crisis, America has lost its “can do” attitude. Economists Paul Krugman and Robin Wells address this in their NEW YORK REVIEW article The Way Out of the Slump : “In the months immediately following the failure of Lehman Brothers, policymakers seemed to understand that we had entered a world in which the usual rules no longer applied–a world in which running huge budget deficits was an act of prudence, not folly… But that understanding faded fast. Unconventional policies are as badly needed as ever; but policymakers have lost their nerve.” (Their assessment is shared by financier George Soros .) Even before the results of the November 2nd elections are in, the U.S. is in gridlock. Politicians know we’re facing hard times but they’re unwilling to make the tough choices required to jump-start the economy. It’s time for liberals to roll up their sleeves and get back to first principles. We must be clear about our values and what’s required to solve the jobs crisis: Every American has the right to a decent job paying a living wage. If the marketplace won’t supply these jobs, then government has to be the employer of last resort. There must be a jobs-oriented stimulus package that not only supports America’s teachers and public safety workers but also strengthens the U.S. infrastructure, in general. (Bring back the WPA!) We can pay for the new stimulus package by increasing taxes on both the wealthy and financial institutions. The Federal government has to be involved in economic policy. It has to intervene and create the jobs that the greedy, shortsighted private sector hasn’t provided. (Even if this means restricting trade with countries like China.) Hard times require tough choices. We have to have folks in Washington who are willing to turn the U.S. in a new direction, where everyone who wants to work has a decent job. We need congress people with liberal values.

Read the full article →

David Isenberg: The Uncounted Contractors

October 5, 2010

Okay, just how long is it going to take for the U.S. government to get an accurate count of the private military and security contractors it employs in Iraq and Afghanistan? Apparently, not any time soon, according to the Government Accounting Office report released last Friday. The report ” DOD, State, and USAID Face Continued Challenges in Tracking Contracts, Assistance Instruments, and Associated Personnel ,” was GAO’s third assessment of the implementation of the Synchronized Predeployment and Operational Tracker (SPOT) and data reported by the three agencies for Afghanistan and Iraq for FY 2009 and the first half of FY 2010 on the (1) number of contractor and assistance personnel, including those providing security; (2) number of personnel killed or wounded; and (3) number and value of contracts and assistance instruments and extent of competition for new awards. What GAO found was that: While the three agencies designated SPOT as their system for tracking statutorily required information in July 2008, SPOT still cannot reliably track information on contracts, assistance instruments, and associated personnel in Iraq or Afghanistan. As a result, the agencies relied on sources of data other than SPOT to respond to our requests for information. The agencies’ implementation of SPOT has been affected by some practical and technical issues, but their efforts also were undermined by a lack of agreement on how to proceed, particularly on how to track local nationals working under contracts or assistance instruments. The lack of agreement was due in part to agencies not having assessed their respective information needs and how SPOT can be designed to address those needs and statutory requirements. In 2009, GAO reported on many of these issues and recommended that the agencies jointly develop a plan to improve SPOT’s implementation. The three agencies reported to GAO that as of March 2010 there were 262,681 contractor and assistance personnel working in Iraq and Afghanistan, 18 percent of whom performed security functions. Due to limitations with agency-reported data, caution should be used in identifying trends or drawing conclusions about the number of personnel in either country. Data limitations are attributable to agency difficulty in determining the number of local nationals, low response rates to agency requests for data, and limited ability to verify the accuracy of reported data. For example, a State office noted that none of its Afghan grant recipients provided requested personnel data. While agency officials acknowledged not all personnel were being counted, they still considered the reported data to be more accurate than SPOT data. Only State and USAID tracked information on the number of contractor and assistance personnel killed or wounded in Iraq and Afghanistan during the review period. State reported 9 contractor and assistance personnel were killed and 68 wounded, while USAID reported 116 killed and 121 wounded. Both agencies noted that some casualties resulted from nonhostile actions. DOD still lacked a system to track similar information and referred GAO to Department of Labor data on cases filed under the Defense Base Act for killed or injured contractors. As GAO previously reported, Labor’s data provide insights but are not a good proxy for the number of contractor casualties. DOD, State, and USAID obligated $37.5 billion on 133,951 contracts and assistance instruments with performance in Iraq and Afghanistan during FY2009 and the first half of FY2010. DOD had the vast majority of contract obligations. Most of the contracts were awarded during the review period and used competitive procedures. State and USAID relied heavily on grants and cooperative agreements and reported that most were competitively awarded. While, doubtlessly, DOD, State, AND USAID are doing the best they can to make SPOT work some issues are likely to prove difficult to solve. Determining the number of local nationals is one example. PMC supporters often note the advantage of using host country nationals is that it funnels money to the people who most need it, the country’s citizens. Yet according to the GAO many local nationals working under contracts and assistance instruments are at remote locations and their numbers can fluctuate daily. DOD officials in Iraq and Afghanistan explain that this is especially true for construction projects, where the stage of construction and season can affect the total number of personnel working on a project. For example, DOD officials in Afghanistan told GAO that at one project site the number of local national personnel working fluctuated anywhere from 600 to 2,100. Further, DOD contracting officials told us in some instances it could be weeks before they are notified that local national personnel are no longer working on a particular project. This has limited the ability to track, in real time, the status of these personnel in SPOT. Also, for personnel working at remote locations, the ability of U.S. government officials to verify the completeness of information in SPOT is hindered by security conditions that make it difficult for them to visit regularly, and they cannot use their limited time on site to verify personnel information. Furthermore, USAID and State policies limit the extent that local national personnel are entered into SPOT. Following their initial use of SPOT, USAID and State developed agency-specific policies regarding SPOT’s implementation. However, in some instances these policies limited the extent to which local nationals were required to be entered into the system. USAID’s April 2009 contract and assistance policy specified only that contractor and assistance personnel deployed to Iraq must be registered in SPOT. The policy explicitly excluded Iraqi entities and nationals from being entered into SPOT, until a classified system is established. It was not until July 2010 that USAID directed that its contractor and assistance personnel working in Afghanistan be accounted for in SPOT. The policy notes that procedures will be provided separately for entering information on Afghan nationals into SPOT, but as of September 2010, such procedures have not been developed. As a result of these policies, information on local nationals working under USAID contracts and assistance instruments in Iraq and Afghanistan is still not being tracked in SPOT. Another problem is that contractors and assistance recipients have not kept SPOT updated. Although the agencies have increasingly required their contractors and assistance recipients to enter personnel information into the system, there has been little emphasis placed on ensuring that the information entered into SPOT is up to date. Specifically, contractors and assistance recipients have not consistently closed the accounts of their personnel once they have left Iraq or Afghanistan. As a result, SPOT does not accurately reflect the number of contract and assistance personnel in either country, and in some cases the numbers may be overstated. SPOT program officials told us that in March 2010 they began periodically reviewing SPOT to close out the accounts of any personnel who either did not actually travel to Iraq or Afghanistan or whose estimated deployment ending date was 14 days overdue. Based on this review, in April 2010 alone, they identified and closed the accounts of over 56,000 such personnel who had been listed in SPOT as still being deployed. Perhaps most disturbing however is that although SPOT was designated as a system for tracking the number of personnel performing security functions, it cannot be used to reliably distinguish personnel performing security functions from other contractors. Consider the difficulty in tracking people authorized to carry weapons: The weapon authorization data field in SPOT identifies personnel who have been authorized to carry a firearm. Employers of armed security contractors are required to enter this information into SPOT as part of DOD’s process to register and account for such personnel in each country. However, USAID officials in Iraq explained that security personnel working under the agency’s contracts and assistance instruments receive authorization to carry firearms from the Iraqi government, not DOD, and are not identified in SPOT as having a weapons authorization. Further, some contractors performing security functions are not authorized to carry weapons and would, therefore, not be included in a count using this method. Conversely, some personnel who are not performing security functions have been authorized to carry weapons for personal protection and would be included in the count. Regardless of the method employed to identify personnel in SPOT, it appears that not all personnel performing security functions are being captured in the system. For example, based on an analysis of SPOT data, no more than 4,309 contractor personnel were performing security functions for DOD in Afghanistan during the second quarter of fiscal year 2010. In contrast, DOD officials overseeing armed contractors in Afghanistan estimated the total number of DOD security contractors in Afghanistan for the same time period was closer to 17,500.

Read the full article →

Welfare, Weakened In Clinton Years, Now A Key Piece Largely Missing From Economic Safety Net

October 3, 2010

The nation’s welfare system of cash assistance, for decades the core of help for mothers and children in financial distress, has become a shrunken piece of the U.S. social safety net. … State by state, welfare programs are a patchwork, with little connection between the condition of a state’s economy and the number of people who have gone onto welfare. Taken together, this new portrait of welfare answers a central question that hovered over the impassioned debate of the mid-1990s, when Congress and the Clinton administration transformed welfare from a federal entitlement into a state-run program of temporary assistance that emphasized work. How would the reshaped welfare system respond, policymakers and advocates wondered then, if the economy plunged into long, serious trouble?

Read the full article →

Northern States Financial Corporation Appoints Barbara J. Martin to Board of Directors

September 22, 2010

WAUKEGAN, IL–(Marketwire – September 22, 2010) –  Northern States Financial Corporation ( NASDAQ : NSFC ), holding company for NorStates Bank, a FDIC-insured financial institution, today announced that Barbara J. Martin has been appointed as a director of the Company to serve until the next annual meeting of stockholders. The addition of Ms. Martin to the Board of Directors of the Company increases the number of directors to nine members. Ms. Martin will also serve as a director of NorStates Bank.

Read the full article →

Foreclosures Hit Record High in August

September 16, 2010

August saw more Americans lose their homes to foreclosure than any other month on record, RealtyTrac reported today. Banks repossessed a total of 95,364 properties in August, a 25 percent increase from the same period in 2009 and a 2 percent increase over this May’s previous record. Foreclosure filings of all types, including default notices, scheduled auctions and bank repossessions (the three major stages of the foreclosure process), increased to 338,836 in the month, a 4 percent jump from July. At the same time, though, the number of default notices that lenders issued to homeowners to initiate the foreclosure process actually went down. The August total of 96,469 was a 1 percent decline from July and a 30 percent drop from August of last year. It’s significantly lower than the April 2009 peak of 142,064 default notices issued. That the numbers of repossessed homes and default notices (respectively the last and first stages of the process) are converging demonstrates that banks are trying to mitigate the flow of new homes to the market. As Bloomberg reported Wednesday, the glut of housing inventory means home prices could decline for at least three years. Indeed, the number of properties with delinquent loans (30 or more days past due) that aren’t yet in foreclosure is currently 4,947,000, or 9.22 percent of all mortgage-financed homes, according to data from Lender Processing Services . The total number of foreclosed properties on the market, LPS says, is 2,038,000. It’s a bleak picture, but glimmers of hope emerge. The majority of Americans (at least, the majority of a 3,399-person sample) think the market has bottomed out, according to a survey released today by Fannie Mae . 47 percent of those surveyed said prices will remain flat for the next year and 31 percent predicted prices will rise. Even in such trying times, the majority of a 2,967-person sample of Americans say it’s “unacceptable” for homeowners to willingly walk away from a mortgage, according to a new survey from Pew Research Center . A whopping 59 percent of respondents condemn homeowners who choose to stop payments on “underwater” mortgages. According to the RealtyTrac data, Nevada and Florida led the nation in rates of foreclosure filings (including default notices, scheduled auctions, and repossessions) in August, despite year-over-year decreases in activity in both those states. One in every 84 Nevada homes received some form of foreclosure filing, compared to one in every 155 homes in Florida. Arizona, California and Idaho were right behind Nevada and Florida in the foreclosure rankings.

Read the full article →

Foreclosures Hit Record High in August

September 16, 2010

August saw more Americans lose their homes to foreclosure than any other month on record, RealtyTrac reported today. Banks repossessed a total of 95,364 properties in August, a 25 percent increase from the same period in 2009 and a 2 percent increase over this May’s previous record. Foreclosure filings of all types, including default notices, scheduled auctions and bank repossessions (the three major stages of the foreclosure process), increased to 338,836 in the month, a 4 percent jump from July. At the same time, though, the number of default notices that lenders issued to homeowners to initiate the foreclosure process actually went down. The August total of 96,469 was a 1 percent decline from July and a 30 percent drop from August of last year. It’s significantly lower than the April 2009 peak of 142,064 default notices issued. That the numbers of repossessed homes and default notices (respectively the last and first stages of the process) are converging demonstrates that banks are trying to mitigate the flow of new homes to the market. As Bloomberg reported Wednesday, the glut of housing inventory means home prices could decline for at least three years. Indeed, the number of properties with delinquent loans (30 or more days past due) that aren’t yet in foreclosure is currently 4,947,000, or 9.22 percent of all mortgage-financed homes, according to data from Lender Processing Services . The total number of foreclosed properties on the market, LPS says, is 2,038,000. It’s a bleak picture, but glimmers of hope emerge. The majority of Americans (at least, the majority of a 3,399-person sample) think the market has bottomed out, according to a survey released today by Fannie Mae . 47 percent of those surveyed said prices will remain flat for the next year and 31 percent predicted prices will rise. Even in such trying times, the majority of a 2,967-person sample of Americans say it’s “unacceptable” for homeowners to willingly walk away from a mortgage, according to a new survey from Pew Research Center . A whopping 59 percent of respondents condemn homeowners who choose to stop payments on “underwater” mortgages. According to the RealtyTrac data, Nevada and Florida led the nation in rates of foreclosure filings (including default notices, scheduled auctions, and repossessions) in August, despite year-over-year decreases in activity in both those states. One in every 84 Nevada homes received some form of foreclosure filing, compared to one in every 155 homes in Florida. Arizona, California and Idaho were right behind Nevada and Florida in the foreclosure rankings.

Read the full article →

Kevin O’Connor: Don’t Make the Solution Part of Your Problem

September 15, 2010

The problem I’ve always been intrigued with innovation and how it can be forced. As an entrepreneur, my job is to create new products and companies; I can’t just sit around waiting for the light to go off while playing Halo. As an executive, I have also been part of a lot of painful strategic planning processes. In one instance, we hired a consultant who took us through an eight month ordeal costing more than $1 million. In the end, we agreed on a strategy that we came up with on the first day. I’ve noticed this happen time and time again. From my experiences working with companies to solve various problems, I’ve noticed a few “truths” that almost always occur when groups try to solve problems: The answers are already in the room. If you assemble a group of smart people who know your industry, they have already assimilated the mass of information from customers, employees, market research and elsewhere. The answers are in the room and not on some manufactured spreadsheet. Most of the time spent trying to solve a problem is typically wasted discussing options that don’t really matter. There are 98 things you could , but shouldn’t, be doing, but in reality there are only two things you need to do as a business to be successful. People often waste time talking about all the things that don’t really matter. Personality trumps. Unfortunately, there isn’t much correlation between speaking skills and quality of ideas. Most people are afraid to share their ideas for fear of looking stupid. But then there are the less deserving people who through force of personality get their way. In order to actually implement the solution, you need consensus and these meetings rarely build lasting consensus. The solution As executives, our goal is to generate as many ideas as possible, identify the top ideas and make a decision while building consensus. But how can you most effectively do that? Just follow these steps: State the problem clearly. Write at the top of the white board the problem you are trying to solve. For example: “How can we improve productivity?”, “What are the biggest problems facing our customers?”, “Which Sports & Recreation topics are best for comparison?” Brainstorm. Ask people to state their ideas succinctly — usually two to three words. Do not allow any discussion or comments on the idea. You want people to play off other people’s ideas and to feel free to say crazy ideas without fear of ridicule. Keep the flow going but don’t beat a dead horse — stop when the flow of ideas has ended. Lobby. As you are numbering each proposed idea, allow people to lobby or clarify their ideas. Make sure you combine similar ideas. Vote. Take the total number of ideas and divide by three — this is the number of votes each person gets. For example, if you have 30 ideas, each person gets 10 votes (30 ideas/3 = 10 votes). The next step is to read off each idea, count the number of votes each idea receives and write the total number of votes next to each idea. Select Top Ideas. You should (hopefully) see a coalescing of votes for the top two to five ideas. Focus your attention on these top ideas and forget about the rest. Here’s a recent example of a brainstorm we just had at FindTheBest . We are constantly coming up with dozens of new Comparison App ideas, but having only limited resources, we only focus on the top ideas. We brainstormed new App ideas and came up with the following (partial) list: E-Readers (5 votes) Fast Food Nutrition (6) Colleges (5) Yogurt Nutrition (1) Venture Capital Firms (5) Planets (1) Designers (0) Empires (1) Travel by Country (3) Future Jobs and Careers Forecast (7) Pulitzer Prize Winners (5) Cosmetics Brands (1) War Statistics (4) State Facts (1) US Presidents (2) Energy Drinks (3) Dating Websites (3) Vegas Hotels (3) Golf Courses (4) Pokémon (5) After voting, we narrowed down our 60 App ideas to the seven most popular ones (the ideas that received 5 votes and higher) and focused on developing those Apps. This efficient and collaborative process provides a platform for all ideas to be heard and for the top ideas to be carried out. After trying this process out, you’ll realize that you’ve just condensed a four hour meeting into 30 minutes and actually found the best solution to your problem. But aside from finding the best solution to your problem, you’ve built consensus between everyone within the company because each person was involved in creating the solution. I’ve used this system many times to help create business and product ideas and strategies resulting in tremendous success. So go out and try this method and let me know how it works or if you need help. Please post a comment with your results.

Read the full article →

Kevin O’Connor: Don’t Make the Solution Part of Your Problem

September 15, 2010

The problem I’ve always been intrigued with innovation and how it can be forced. As an entrepreneur, my job is to create new products and companies; I can’t just sit around waiting for the light to go off while playing Halo. As an executive, I have also been part of a lot of painful strategic planning processes. In one instance, we hired a consultant who took us through an eight month ordeal costing more than $1 million. In the end, we agreed on a strategy that we came up with on the first day. I’ve noticed this happen time and time again. From my experiences working with companies to solve various problems, I’ve noticed a few “truths” that almost always occur when groups try to solve problems: The answers are already in the room. If you assemble a group of smart people who know your industry, they have already assimilated the mass of information from customers, employees, market research and elsewhere. The answers are in the room and not on some manufactured spreadsheet. Most of the time spent trying to solve a problem is typically wasted discussing options that don’t really matter. There are 98 things you could , but shouldn’t, be doing, but in reality there are only two things you need to do as a business to be successful. People often waste time talking about all the things that don’t really matter. Personality trumps. Unfortunately, there isn’t much correlation between speaking skills and quality of ideas. Most people are afraid to share their ideas for fear of looking stupid. But then there are the less deserving people who through force of personality get their way. In order to actually implement the solution, you need consensus and these meetings rarely build lasting consensus. The solution As executives, our goal is to generate as many ideas as possible, identify the top ideas and make a decision while building consensus. But how can you most effectively do that? Just follow these steps: State the problem clearly. Write at the top of the white board the problem you are trying to solve. For example: “How can we improve productivity?”, “What are the biggest problems facing our customers?”, “Which Sports & Recreation topics are best for comparison?” Brainstorm. Ask people to state their ideas succinctly — usually two to three words. Do not allow any discussion or comments on the idea. You want people to play off other people’s ideas and to feel free to say crazy ideas without fear of ridicule. Keep the flow going but don’t beat a dead horse — stop when the flow of ideas has ended. Lobby. As you are numbering each proposed idea, allow people to lobby or clarify their ideas. Make sure you combine similar ideas. Vote. Take the total number of ideas and divide by three — this is the number of votes each person gets. For example, if you have 30 ideas, each person gets 10 votes (30 ideas/3 = 10 votes). The next step is to read off each idea, count the number of votes each idea receives and write the total number of votes next to each idea. Select Top Ideas. You should (hopefully) see a coalescing of votes for the top two to five ideas. Focus your attention on these top ideas and forget about the rest. Here’s a recent example of a brainstorm we just had at FindTheBest . We are constantly coming up with dozens of new Comparison App ideas, but having only limited resources, we only focus on the top ideas. We brainstormed new App ideas and came up with the following (partial) list: E-Readers (5 votes) Fast Food Nutrition (6) Colleges (5) Yogurt Nutrition (1) Venture Capital Firms (5) Planets (1) Designers (0) Empires (1) Travel by Country (3) Future Jobs and Careers Forecast (7) Pulitzer Prize Winners (5) Cosmetics Brands (1) War Statistics (4) State Facts (1) US Presidents (2) Energy Drinks (3) Dating Websites (3) Vegas Hotels (3) Golf Courses (4) Pokémon (5) After voting, we narrowed down our 60 App ideas to the seven most popular ones (the ideas that received 5 votes and higher) and focused on developing those Apps. This efficient and collaborative process provides a platform for all ideas to be heard and for the top ideas to be carried out. After trying this process out, you’ll realize that you’ve just condensed a four hour meeting into 30 minutes and actually found the best solution to your problem. But aside from finding the best solution to your problem, you’ve built consensus between everyone within the company because each person was involved in creating the solution. I’ve used this system many times to help create business and product ideas and strategies resulting in tremendous success. So go out and try this method and let me know how it works or if you need help. Please post a comment with your results.

Read the full article →