payment

Bank of America to Pay for Merrill Guarantees as SEC to Sue Over Bonuses

September 22, 2009

By Margaret Popper and David Mildenberg Sept. 22 (Bloomberg) — Bank of America Corp., the biggest U.S. bank, said it will pay the government $425 million to cancel an unused guarantee of Merrill Lynch & Co.’s assets and cut reliance on federal support after two bailouts. The payment would end a dispute over what the bank owes the U.S. for a promise to help absorb losses on $118 billion of holdings, mostly at Merrill Lynch. The federal guarantee helped seal Bank of America’s takeover of the New York-based brokerage after fourth-quarter losses spiraled past $15 billion. While the accord was announced in January, an agreement was never signed and the bank resisted paying. Chief Executive Officer Kenneth D. Lewis has said he wants to shrink the U.S. role in company affairs. Paying the fee is part of a plan to reduce “reliance on government support and return to normal market funding,” the company said yesterday in a statement. The Treasury Department, Federal Reserve and Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. will get the money. “The bank is a wounded duck and everybody wants a piece of them,” said Robert Serino , a partner at Buckley Sandler LLP in Washington and a former director of the Comptroller of the Currency’s enforcement and compliance division. “In the past, Ken Lewis was a pretty strong character but now he’s been beaten down like everybody else.” Even as the payment was announced, the Securities and Exchange Commission pledged to “vigorously pursue” a case against the bank for not disclosing $3.6 billion in bonuses to Merrill before the acquisition was completed. U.S. Judge Jed Rakoff last week rejected a $33 million settlement, accusing both the bank and SEC of trying to avoid a public trial. Congressional Pressure Bank of America also faces pressure from Representative Edolphus Towns , a New York Democrat and chairman of the House Oversight Committee, who scolded the bank yesterday for missing a deadline to turn over documents sought by his panel. Chief Marketing Officer Anne Finucane plans to meet with Towns to discuss how to provide information “without violating attorney- client privilege,” bank spokesman Scott Silvestri said. Lewis “is holding up very well,” spokesman Robert Stickler said. “He doesn’t dwell on things that he can’t control and he remains convinced that the deal will be a good one for shareholders over time.” The Merrill asset guarantees prompted regulators to press for compensation from the Charlotte, North Carolina-based bank. The government said Bank of America benefited from the accord’s implied U.S. backing for three to four months as investors were speculating the company might fail or be nationalized. ‘Encouraging Sign’ The agreement reflects “an encouraging sign of increased stability in the financial system,” Treasury spokesman Andrew Williams said. The bank said in July it expected a settlement of the dispute within 30 days. “This is another terrible deal for taxpayers negotiated by the U.S. Treasury,” said Linus Wilson , a University of Louisiana professor who has studied government bailout programs. The bank is paying less than 10 percent of a potential $4.3 billion cost, including warrants associated with $4 billion in preferred shares cited in the term sheet and never issued. “The insurance company does not refund most of your premium just because you did not wreck your car in the last six months,” Wilson said. Bank of America hasn’t received permission to repay the extra $20 billion of U.S. rescue funds that came with the Merrill deal, Chief Financial Officer Joe Price said last week. The bank received a total of $45 billion from the Troubled Asset Relief Program and expects to repay the money in installments, pending approval by regulators, Price said. New Board Member The bank added its sixth new board member this year, tapping DuPont Co. Chairman Charles “Chad” Holliday Jr . Bank of America will have 15 members on its board, down from 18, with all positions now filled. Holliday “will get the board to gel in the proper way,” said Ram Charan , an author, management consultant and former Harvard Business School professor who said he has known the DuPont executive for 25 years. “The board will do what is necessary to get the most out of a franchise that is the envy of the rest of the banking industry.” During Holliday’s 11 years as DuPont CEO, the shares of the third-biggest U.S. chemical maker declined 55 percent. Bank of America shares have dropped by more than a third since Lewis took over as CEO in April 2001. Holliday didn’t respond to a request for a comment through DuPont spokeswoman Lori Captain. To contact the reporters on this story: Margaret Popper in New York at mpopper1@bloomberg.net ; David Mildenberg in Charlotte at dmildenberg@bloomberg.net .

Read the full article →

Hacker Gonzalez to Admit Guilt in Credit Card Theft, Forfeit $1.65 Million

August 28, 2009

By Patricia Hurtado and Linda Sandler Aug. 29 (Bloomberg) — Albert Gonzalez, the computer hacker charged with stealing 130 million credit and debit card numbers, will plead guilty to previous data-theft charges in New York and Massachusetts and forfeit assets, U.S. prosecutors said. Gonzalez faces 15 years to 25 years in prison, authorities said in a Massachusetts court filing yesterday. The sentences imposed in Massachusetts will run concurrently with any handed out in New Jersey, where Gonzalez was charged this month with stealing the credit card numbers, and New York, they said. Federal prosecutors in Boston charged Gonzalez and others with stealing credit and debit card numbers from companies including TJX Cos. , BJ’s Wholesale Club Inc. , OfficeMax Inc. , Barnes & Noble Inc. and Sports Authority Inc. The hackers scouted potential victims on a list of Fortune 500 companies and then visited retail stores to identify the payment processing systems and their vulnerabilities, prosecutors said. Gonzalez agreed to forfeit more than $1.65 million in U.S. currency, a condominium in Miami, a blue 2006 BMW automobile, IBM and Toshiba laptop computers and related equipment, a Glock 27 firearm, a Nokia cell phone, a Tiffany diamond ring and three Rolex watches, according to the filing. Gonzalez, who is in federal custody in Brooklyn, New York, was indicted last year by federal grand juries in Massachusetts and New York for data breaches at companies. He was a federal informant after his arrest in New Jersey by the U.S. Secret Service in 2003 in a case involving hackers known as the Shadowcrew, the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Boston said in a statement after indicting him on Aug. 5, 2008. Informant The Secret Service later discovered that Gonzalez, who was working as an informant for it, was criminally involved in the case, federal officials said last year. In the Shadowcrew case, the Secret Service arrested 21 people in the U.S. in October 2004 for their role in one of the largest online centers for trafficking in stolen credit and bank card numbers. Gonzalez wasn’t indicted in that case. Gonzalez and the two hackers were charged in Newark earlier this month with two counts of conspiracy in a scheme to sell data they stole using computers in New Jersey, California, Illinois, Latvia, Ukraine and the Netherlands, according to the indictment. He faces as many as 35 years in prison in the new case. ‘Accepted Responsibility’ “As evidenced from the plea agreement, Albert has accepted responsibility for his actions and looks forward to a resolution of these cases,” said George Farkas, a lawyer who is representing Gonzalez. Gonzalez was scheduled to go to trial Sept. 14 in federal court in Central Islip, N.Y., before U.S. District Judge Sandra Feuerstein . Among the charges is operating a fraud scheme from April through September in 2007, including hacking into computers at the corporate headquarters of Dave & Buster’s Inc. , a restaurant chain, and stealing debit and credit card numbers. In the new case, the hackers used software known as malware and so-called injection strings to attack the computers and steal data, prosecutors said. They installed “sniffer” programs to capture data “on a real-time basis” as it moved through the computer networks and used instant messaging services to advise each other on how to navigate the systems, according to the indictment. They also programmed malware to evade detection by anti-virus software and erase files that might detect its presence, prosecutors said. The Massachusetts case is U.S. v. Albert Gonzalez, 08-CR-10223, U.S. District Court, District of Massachusetts (Boston). The New York case is U.S. v. Yastremskiy, 08-CR-00160, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of New York (Central Islip). To contact the reporters on this story: Patricia Hurtado in New York State Supreme Court in Manhattan at pathurtado@bloomberg.net ; Linda Sandler in New York at lsandler@bloomberg.net .

Read the full article →

Computer Hackers Indicted in Record Theft of 130 Million U.S. Card Numbers

August 17, 2009

By David Voreacos Aug. 17 (Bloomberg) — A Miami man and two unidentified computer hackers were charged with stealing 130 million credit and debit card numbers in what the Justice Department said was the largest such prosecution in U.S. history. Albert Gonzalez, 28, and two hackers living “in or near Russia” were indicted today by a federal grand jury in Newark, New Jersey, for the theft of data from Heartland Payment Systems Inc. , 7- Eleven Inc. , Delhaize Group’s Hannaford Brothers Co. and two unidentified national retailers. The hackers stole 130 million card numbers from Heartland, a bank-card payment processor, starting in December 2007, by using malicious computer software, according to the 14-page indictment. An undetermined number of card numbers were stolen from 7-Eleven and 4.2 million from Hannaford, a regional supermarket chain, according to the indictment. “This investigation marks the continued success of law enforcement in tracking down cutting edge hacking schemes committed by hackers working together across the globe,” acting U.S. Attorney Ralph Marra said in a statement. The case is U.S. v. Gonzalez, U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey. To contact the reporter on this story: David Voreacos in Newark, New Jersey, at dvoreacos@bloomberg.net .

Read the full article →

Citigroup Sued by Ex-Broker Over Demand That He Repay Signing-Bonus Loan

August 13, 2009

By Thom Weidlich Aug. 13 (Bloomberg) — A former Citigroup Inc. broker in Ohio sued the bank, arguing that he shouldn’t have to pay all at once the $39,000 left on his forgivable signing-bonus loan when he quit in 2006. Thomas Banus, who now works at MetLife Inc. ’s Walnut Street Securities in Cleveland, seeks class-action, or group, status for the suit on behalf of at least 500 brokers employed by Citigroup in the past six years who executed such promissory notes. Brokers who leave before the loan is retired must immediately pay the unforgiven portion with interest, he said. “The acceleration and imputed interest clauses are unconscionable, and offend public policy,” Banus said in his complaint, filed yesterday in New York federal court. The loans are intended to ensure employees don’t leave, according to the complaint. Banus left after two years because Citigroup “did not manage its business in such a manner as to provide the level of service and security necessary for any security broker and the plaintiff to attract and/or retain clients,” he wrote. The bank was “unstable, mismanaged and not a secure place for” his clients, “as can be seen from the value of defendant’s stock today.” Citigroup rose 11 cents to $4.09 at 12:13 p.m. in New York Stock Exchange composite trading. The shares, which reached $57 in December 2006, have fallen 77 percent in the past year. When Banus left, Citigroup, rescued last year by a $45 billion U.S. bailout, demanded immediate payment, he said. ‘Illusory Contract’ “We believe this suit is without merit,” Danielle Romero- Apsilos , a Citigroup spokeswoman, said in an e-mailed statement. Banus said the employment agreement and note he signed are “an illusory contract” because the New York-based bank can terminate a broker’s employment and accelerate the loan with no loss to itself, while the broker must pay the debt with interest. “If the acceleration clause kicked in at the time you missed the payment, then arguably it’s just like every other acceleration clause,” said Mark Thierman of Reno, Nevada, one of Banus’s lawyers. “If it kicks in early at the time you leave, then it’s a penalty, and all states prohibit a penalty for leaving your job.” Thierman said such arrangements are standard in the securities industry. He said Banus wants to either not have to pay back the rest of the loan because the contract is void or not have to pay it all at once. “They started charging his clients differently from when he brought them in,” Thierman said. “His clients left and he couldn’t make his numbers, so he left.” The case is Banus v. Citigroup Global Markets Inc., 09-cv- 7128, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York (Manhattan). To contact the reporter on this story: Thom Weidlich in the New York federal courthouse at 9245 or tweidlich@bloomberg.net .

Read the full article →

Cinema Stock Surge May Let Redstone Keep More Theaters: Chart of the Day

July 30, 2009

By Andy Fixmer and Rodney Yap July 30 (Bloomberg) — Sumner Redstone , chairman of Viacom Inc. and CBS Corp., may have an easier time digging out of debt because of the surging shares of movie-theater companies

Read the full article →

Islamic Finance Key to Asia’s Economic Revival, Kuwait Finance House Says

July 29, 2009

By Katrina Nicholas July 29 (Bloomberg) — Islamic finance will play a central role in reviving Asian economies as investors look to emerging markets to deliver higher returns than the U.S. and Europe, according to Kuwait Finance House . Demand for investments backed by tangible assets like power plants and property grew after banks outside of Asia were hit hardest by the global financial crisis, Baljeet Grewal , managing director of the second-biggest Islamic bank’s research unit, said in a phone interview from Kuala Lumpur yesterday. “Islamic finance is no longer on the periphery and so any crisis which impacts the global economy will of course impact it,” Grewal said

Read the full article →