possibility

Video: Credit Agricole’s Kotecha Discusses Global Economies: Video

August 26, 2010

Aug. 27 (Bloomberg) — Mitul Kotecha, Hong Kong-based global head of foreign-exchange strategy at Credit Agricole CIB, talks about the outlook for the U.S. and European economies and central banks’ monetary policies. Kotecha also discusses the possibility that Japan’s policy makers will take measures to curb the yen’s advance. Kotecha talks with Linzie Janis on Bloomberg Television’s “Global Connection.” (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Video: Waldorf Says EHarmony Revenue $250 Million a Year: Video

August 19, 2010

Aug. 19 (Bloomberg) — Gregory Waldorf, chief executive officer of eHarmony Inc., talks about the company’s performance. Waldorf also discusses eHarmony’s match-making service, European growth and the possibility that the company may have an initial public offering. He talks with Matt Miller and Carol Massar on Bloomberg Television’s “Street Smart.” (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Video: Counterfeit Pound Coins May Force Royal Mint to Reissue

August 16, 2010

Aug. 16 (Bloomberg) — Bloomberg’s Anastasia Haydulina reports on the record number of counterfeit pound coins in the U.K. and the possibility of the Royal Mint reissuing the tender.

Read the full article →

Video: Cohan Says Goldman Plan for Principal Strategies `Smart’: Video

August 5, 2010

Aug. 5 (Bloomberg) — William Cohan, author of “House of Cards” and a Bloomberg Television contributing editor, talks about the possibility of Goldman Sachs Group Inc. transforming its principal-strategies business, a group that makes bets with the firm’s own capital, into a fund and raising outside money. Cohan speaks with Scarlet Fu on Bloomberg Television’s “In the Loop With Betty Liu.” (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Video: New York Fed May Require Banks to Buy Back Faulty Loans: Video

August 4, 2010

Aug. 4 (Bloomberg) — Bloomberg’s Dawn Kopecki reports on the possibility that the Federal Reserve Bank of New York may require banks to buy back its faulty loans. The New York Fed may seek to make banks repurchase holdings of mortgages and other assets acquired through the rescues of Bear Stearns Cos. and American International Group Inc., a spokesman says. Kopecki talks with Matt Miller and Lizzie O’Leary on Bloomberg Television’s “Street Smart.” (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Pet Food Recall EXPANDED: See The Brands Affected

August 3, 2010

Procter & Gamble is expanding a pet food recall to include veterinary and some specialized dry pet food as a precautionary measure because there is the possibility of salmonella contamination.

Read the full article →

Video: Pan Says India Interest Rate Increases Will Be Gradual: Video

July 26, 2010

July 27 (Bloomberg) — Indranil Pan, chief economist at Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd., talks with Bloomberg’s Mark Barton about the outlook for Reserve Bank of India monetary policy. India needs tighter monetary policy to cool inflation, the central bank said, signaling the possibility of an interest-rate increase today. Pan, speaking from Mumbai, also discusses the government’s decision to allow state-run refiners to raise gasoline and diesel costs in a bid to cut its subsidies bill. (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Video: Gheit Says Appointing Dudley as BP CEO Would Make Sense: Video

July 26, 2010

July 26 (Bloomberg) — Fadel Gheit, managing director of oil and gas research at Oppenheimer & Co., talks about the possibility that Tony Hayward will be replaced by Robert Dudley as chief executive at BP Plc. Gheit, talking with Carol Massar on Bloomberg Television’s “In the Loop,” also comments on the potential costs the company faces from the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico. (This is an excerpt of the full interview. (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Video: Direct Edge’s O’Brien Says Initial Share Sale Possible: Video

July 21, 2010

July 21 (Bloomberg) — William O’Brien, chief executive officer of Direct Edge Holdings LLC, talks about the possibility that the company may hold an initial public offering. O’Brien says an IPO is a “possibility.” Direct Edge’s two stock markets became registered exchanges this week. O’Brien speaks with Pimm Fox on Bloomberg Television’s “Taking Stock”. (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Toyota Subpoenaed By Federal Grand Jury

July 20, 2010

TOKYO — Toyota Motor Corp. said Tuesday it has been subpoenaed by a federal grand jury in New York to submit documents related to problems with rods that connect a vehicle’s steering system to its front wheels. The world’s largest automaker, which is trying to repair a reputation damaged by recalls of millions of cars worldwide since October, said the federal grand jury issued the subpoena to its U.S. subsidiary in late June. Toyota said it was the company’s second subpoena from a federal grand jury – a panel that can determine whether evidence exists to bring criminal charges. “The company and its subsidiary are sincerely cooperating with authorities on the probe,” Toyota said in a statement. Defective steering relay rods led Toyota to recall 4Runner sports utility vehicles and T100 pickup trucks in the United States in 2005. Toyota said the grand jury’s subpoena did not specify vehicle models and it was not clear that the subpoena was linked to the 2005 recall, which came several years before safety lapses erupted into a global recall crisis late last year. The automaker has recalled more than 8.5 million vehicles worldwide since October, including 6 million in the U.S. alone, to address the possibility of unintended acceleration and to fix a braking problem in its Prius hybrid. In February, Toyota was subpoenaed by a U.S. federal grand jury seeking documents related to unintended acceleration in its vehicles and the braking system of its Prius hybrid. Earlier this year, Michigan’s attorney general also asked Toyota to submit information on the recent U.S. recalls, Toyota spokeswoman Ririko Takeuchi said. She declined to elaborate. Toyota paid a record $16.4 million fine for being slow to recall vehicles with an accelerator pedal problem and is facing hundreds of state and federal lawsuits. Congress is considering an upgrade to auto safety laws in the aftermath of the Toyota recalls that began in October. In Tokyo, Toyota shares fell 2.6 percent Tuesday to close at 3,055 yen before the subpoena announcement was made.

Read the full article →

Video: Hellwig Says Outlook for U.S. Economy `Not Attractive’: Video

July 19, 2010

July 19 (Bloomberg) — Walter “Bucky” Hellwig, a senior vice president at BB&T Wealth Management, talks with Bloomberg’s Mark Crumpton about the possibility that the U.S. economy may fall back into recession. Hellwig also discusses the outlook for the U.S. labor market and stocks. Bloomberg’s Joe Brusuelas and Dominic Chu also speak. (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Video: Fleckenstein Discusses Market Outlook, Strategy: Video

June 30, 2010

June 30 (Bloomberg) — Bill Fleckenstein, president of Fleckenstein Capital in Seattle, talks about the outlook for the stock market and the possibility that it has lost its “discounting mechanism”.¶ Fleckenstein speaks with Betty Liu on Bloomberg Television’s “In the Loop.” (This is an excerpt of the full interview. Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Offshore Drillers Required to Give Information on Blowout Risk, U.S. Says

June 19, 2010

By Jim Efstathiou Jr. June 19 (Bloomberg) — The U.S. will require oil-and-gas drillers in offshore waters to provide information about the possibility of a well blowout when seeking permits, the Interior Department said, reversing a Bush administration policy. Companies must estimate the amount of oil that might gush from an undersea well if systems designed to cap the flow fail in an emergency, the department said yesterday in a statement. The directive follows the April explosion and sinking of Deepwater Horizon drilling rig leased by BP Plc in the Gulf of Mexico that unleashed an oil spill the company has yet to stop. “The BP oil spill has laid bare fundamental shortcomings in the oil and gas industry’s ability to prevent and stop catastrophic blowouts,” Interior Secretary Ken Salazar said. “This is basic information that applicants should be able to provide; it should not delay permitting of appropriate shallow water drilling.” Deepwater drilling in the Gulf has been suspended for six months while a presidential commission investigates the BP spill. BP has been faulted for not anticipating the failure of the well’s blowout preventer, a device that is the last line of defense if other safeguards fail. Representative Edward Markey , chairman of the energy and environment panel of the House Energy Committee, said yesterday that he will ask oil-company executives to revamp the oil-spill response plans that lawmakers this week said were duplications and inadequate to deal with an environmental disaster. Salazar said applications to explore and drill must include plans to stop a leaking well from the surface and to drill a relief well. Companies also must estimate the time required to get a rig to the site and complete the relief well. ‘Blowout Scenario’ Salazar’s “Blowout Scenario” directive reverses a policy adopted in 2003 during the Bush administration that exempted many offshore operators in the Gulf from providing information about a well blowout, according to the statement. Markey said his request to the companies for new spill plans was prompted by disclosures during the June 15 hearing with the executives. Exxon Mobil Corp. , ConocoPhillips , Chevron Corp. and Royal Dutch Shell Plc were described as being as unprepared as BP to respond to spills during a House Energy Committee hearing. BP and three of the companies listed walruses among species to protect and included ineffective equipment in the response plans submitted to regulators. The spill-response plans for the five companies were “90 percent identical,” Markey said at the hearing. “The American people deserve oil safety plans that are ironclad and not boilerplate,” Markey said. To contact the reporter on this story: Jim Efstathiou Jr . in Washington at jefstathiou@bloomberg.net .

Read the full article →

11 Cities That Are Beating The Recession (PHOTOS)

June 16, 2010

This recession has been particularly brutal on American cities. Nearly one in five Americans are unemployed — or can’t find enough work — housing prices have fallen 17% since 2007, our $13 trillion debt is out of control, and experts are now preparing for the possibility of a double-dip recession. But at a local level, some cities are recovering much faster than others. The Brookings Institute has released its l atest quarterly MetroMonitor report , tracking the economic recovery of America’s 100 largest metro areas. The ranking considered the changes in four economic indicators over the last three years: employment, unemployment, gross metropolitan product (like a city’s GDP), and housing prices. The ranking suggests that Southern cities, many of them in Texas, have shown the most economic resilience since the downturn began. The weakest-performing areas were clustered in California and Florida. READ the full Brookings Institute report here , and check out the 11 MOST resilient cities here.

Read the full article →

BP&rsquos Rating Cut by Fitch to Two Levels Above &lsquoJunk&rsquo

June 15, 2010

By Brian Swint and John Glover June 15 (Bloomberg) — BP Plc’s credit rating was cut six levels to two above junk by Fitch Ratings on concern over the potential cost of cleaning up the Gulf of Mexico oil spill and meeting future liabilities. BP’s long-term issuer default and senior unsecured ratings were lowered to BBB from AA, Fitch said in a statement today. That follows a reduction from AA+ on June 3. President Barack Obama and U.S. lawmakers said this week that BP should suspend dividends and set aside funds now for legal claims against the company from the spill, the worst in U.S. history. Fitch said it would be “surprised” if BP didn’t suspend the quarterly payout until the full costs are known. The cost of cleanup and liabilities may reach $40 billion, Standard Chartered Plc. estimated last week. “The recent claims by U.S. state and federal authorities that BP escrow significant sums preemptively, ahead of any agreed claims process, represent a material change in approach,” Fitch said in a statement. BP has about $23 billion of debt outstanding, Bloomberg data show. BP fell 3.8 percent to 342 pence in London, the lowest since April 1997, after earlier rising as much as 2 percent. Borrowing Costs BP’s cost of borrowing is greater now for the short term than for longer periods, a signal lenders are concerned at the possibility of incurring losses on their credits. Investors demand more yield to compensate them for an expected loss in the short term because a decline in the value of a long-term investment can be spread out over a greater period. The result is that the so-called yield curve inverts as yields on short-term bonds rise. The yield premium investors demand to hold BP’s $1.5 billion of 3.125 percent bonds due 2012 rather than similar- maturity government debt jumped 114 basis points to 730 basis points, according to Trace, the bond-price reporting system of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority. The spread on its $1 billion of 4.75 percent notes due 2019 increased 48 basis points to 378 basis points, according to Trace. BP five-year credit-default swaps surged 39 basis points to 476.5 after today’s ratings downgrade, according to CMA DataVision. Contracts covering the company’s debt for one year were at 579 basis points, according to CMA. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid yesterday requested that BP set aside $20 billion in a fund to be administered by an independent trustee to speed up the claims process for victims of the spill. Changed Outlook Fitch changed the outlook on BP to “evolving” from “negative.” BP had $5 billion of cash available, $5.25 billion of bank credit lines it hadn’t used and another $5.25 billion of stand- by bank facilities, according to Fitch, which cited a June 4 investor call. Fitch said it expects BP’s lenders to allow the company to use the credit lines if needed. Moody’s Investors Service rates BP debt at Aa2, the third- highest investment grade, and Standard & Poor’s has it at AA-, seven grades above the highest non-investment ranking. S&P downgraded BP by one level last week. Moody’s and S&P, both based in New York, declined to comment. To contact the reporter on this story: Brian Swint in London at bswint@bloomberg.net . John Glover in London at johnglover@bloomberg.net

Read the full article →

Donna Flagg: The Difference Between Performance Reviews and Performance Management

June 14, 2010

All too often in many companies, performance reviews are treated as an annual event. But in order to truly be useful, evaluating employees and providing feedback should really be a continuous function in every organization – all the time. It’s not enough to tell someone retrospectively once a year how he or she fared over the course of twelve months, nor does doing so fully capture an accurate picture of that individual’s value to the business, or lack thereof. Every employer has daily opportunities to provide employees with information about their performance that is accurate, constructive and actionable. On the positive side, this does not mean that a pat on the back is necessary every two seconds. In fact, it reminds me of my first boss who told me that I should assume I was doing fine as long as I didn’t hear from her. I think her exact words were, “No news is good news.” That was her way to give me the information I needed without having to interrupt me from my work to say that I was doing a good job. For me, it was very effective because I knew she was pleased, until she wasn’t, in which case she told me on the spot. But what made it all work was that my annual review became a review of the conversations we’d had as well as a forum to plan out a strategy for the weeks and months to come. So no matter how one manager chooses to evaluate his or her employees, what’s important is that the employees are crystal clear about where they stand and how they are doing, for better and worse. It is far better an alternative than sitting someone down after the fact with a laundry list of “strengths and weaknesses” to let him/her know how he/she did, only after it’s too late for him/her to do anything about it. For an organization trying to reach its goals, delaying feedback delays the possibility of improving results, which in theory and practice makes no sense. There will always be performance-related matters to discuss when something needs to be corrected, improved, recognized and congratulated. It is a healthy balance of formal and informal feedback which creates the kind of continuity that strengthens employee performance to in turn improve organizational performance. A good rule of thumb is to conduct formal reviews every six-to-twelve months, provide semi-formal feedback quarterly and offer informal performance discussions continuously on an ongoing basis. Meanwhile, there are a few things you can do to help ensure that your conversations around performance are as constructive, productive and organizationally relevant as possible. — If you are providing written feedback, give the employee a chance to read and digest it privately beforehand. Encourage him/her to make notes and jot down any thoughts that he/she would like to discuss with you at the time of the review. — At the time of the conversation, ask the employee if he/she has any questions about the evaluation before delving into the verbal delivery. Many times if they do, it opens up a perfect segue for you to discuss issues in the form of a dialogue rather than overwhelming them with a monologue. — Share your observations of their overall strengths and weaknesses and provide examples. — Make sure the evaluation spans the whole review period, not just what is in recent memory. — Remain objective. Never become emotional and never, ever argue with the reviewee. — Get feedback from the reviewee and set future goals and objectives together. — Agree on measurement markers and an appropriate timeline before ending the conversation. — Add a section to employee reviews that evaluates how well they have taken the feedback they have received and incorporated it into their performance.

Read the full article →

Donna Flagg: The Difference Between Performance Reviews and Performance Management

June 14, 2010

All too often in many companies, performance reviews are treated as an annual event. But in order to truly be useful, evaluating employees and providing feedback should really be a continuous function in every organization – all the time. It’s not enough to tell someone retrospectively once a year how he or she fared over the course of twelve months, nor does doing so fully capture an accurate picture of that individual’s value to the business, or lack thereof. Every employer has daily opportunities to provide employees with information about their performance that is accurate, constructive and actionable. On the positive side, this does not mean that a pat on the back is necessary every two seconds. In fact, it reminds me of my first boss who told me that I should assume I was doing fine as long as I didn’t hear from her. I think her exact words were, “No news is good news.” That was her way to give me the information I needed without having to interrupt me from my work to say that I was doing a good job. For me, it was very effective because I knew she was pleased, until she wasn’t, in which case she told me on the spot. But what made it all work was that my annual review became a review of the conversations we’d had as well as a forum to plan out a strategy for the weeks and months to come. So no matter how one manager chooses to evaluate his or her employees, what’s important is that the employees are crystal clear about where they stand and how they are doing, for better and worse. It is far better an alternative than sitting someone down after the fact with a laundry list of “strengths and weaknesses” to let him/her know how he/she did, only after it’s too late for him/her to do anything about it. For an organization trying to reach its goals, delaying feedback delays the possibility of improving results, which in theory and practice makes no sense. There will always be performance-related matters to discuss when something needs to be corrected, improved, recognized and congratulated. It is a healthy balance of formal and informal feedback which creates the kind of continuity that strengthens employee performance to in turn improve organizational performance. A good rule of thumb is to conduct formal reviews every six-to-twelve months, provide semi-formal feedback quarterly and offer informal performance discussions continuously on an ongoing basis. Meanwhile, there are a few things you can do to help ensure that your conversations around performance are as constructive, productive and organizationally relevant as possible. — If you are providing written feedback, give the employee a chance to read and digest it privately beforehand. Encourage him/her to make notes and jot down any thoughts that he/she would like to discuss with you at the time of the review. — At the time of the conversation, ask the employee if he/she has any questions about the evaluation before delving into the verbal delivery. Many times if they do, it opens up a perfect segue for you to discuss issues in the form of a dialogue rather than overwhelming them with a monologue. — Share your observations of their overall strengths and weaknesses and provide examples. — Make sure the evaluation spans the whole review period, not just what is in recent memory. — Remain objective. Never become emotional and never, ever argue with the reviewee. — Get feedback from the reviewee and set future goals and objectives together. — Agree on measurement markers and an appropriate timeline before ending the conversation. — Add a section to employee reviews that evaluates how well they have taken the feedback they have received and incorporated it into their performance.

Read the full article →

Video: Argus’s Weiss Sees BP Cutting or Suspending Dividend: Video

June 11, 2010

June 11 (Bloomberg) — Philip Weiss, an analyst at Argus Research, talks about the possibility that BP Plc may cut or suspend its dividend and outlook for costs related to the containment and cleanup of the Gulf of Mexico oil leak. Weiss speaks on Bloomberg Television’s “InBusiness With Margaret Brennan.” (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Video: Argus’s Weiss Sees BP Cutting or Suspending Dividend: Video

June 11, 2010

June 11 (Bloomberg) — Philip Weiss, an analyst at Argus Research, talks about the possibility that BP Plc may cut or suspend its dividend and outlook for costs related to the containment and cleanup of the Gulf of Mexico oil leak. Weiss speaks on Bloomberg Television’s “InBusiness With Margaret Brennan.” (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Video: Gammel Says BP May Suspend Dividend for 1 to 3 Quarters: Video

June 11, 2010

June 11 (Bloomberg) — Jason Gammel, an analyst at Macquarie Securities USA Inc., talks about the possibility that BP Plc may suspend its dividend, investment strategy in BP’s stock and the company’s viability in the U.S. Gammel talks with Deirdre Bolton on Bloomberg Television’s “InsideTrack.” (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Chris Matthews: A Dead-Serious Thought on BP

June 10, 2010

What is all this talk about the possibility of BP declaring bankruptcy? What would that do to the “legitimate” claims against it? I have had this concern from the beginning that the interests of BP and those of the president are decidedly different. BP has a responsibility to its stockholders. Already beaten down by the drop in stock value, will the stockholders now demand that BP seek the protection of bankruptcy? Will the giant oil company resort to this measure as a way of meeting its fiduciary responsibility? That’s a great question. Can the government of the United States do anything about it? That’s another one. Whatever the president can do to protect the interests of BP’s American victims should be number one on his agenda. Visit msnbc.com for breaking news , world news , and news about the economy

Read the full article →

Peltz Gets Approach on Possible Takeover of Wendy’sArby’s Fast-Food Chain

June 10, 2010

By Jennifer Sondag June 10 (Bloomberg) — Nelson Peltz ’s Trian Fund Management LP, the biggest shareholder in Wendy’s/Arby’s Group Inc., said it was approached by a third party about the possibility of participating in a takeover of the fast-food chain. Trian is considering the inquiry and other alternatives, the fund manager said in a regulatory filing today. Trian holds about 18 percent of Atlanta-based Wendy’s/Arby’s. Wendy’s/Arby’s, the third-largest U.S. fast-food chain, had a market value of about $1.9 billion at today’s close of $4.34 on the New York Stock Exchange. The stock gained 51 cents to $4.85 at 4:49 p.m. in after-hours trading . Wendy’s and Arby’s merged after Triarc Cos., owner of the Arby’s brand, bought Wendy’s International Inc. for $2.56 billion in 2008. Triarc changed its name to Wendy’s/Arby’s after the merger closed. Nelson Peltz, former chairman of Triarc, is the non-executive chairman of the combined company. To contact the reporter on this story: Jennifer Sondag in New York at jsondag@bloomberg.net .

Read the full article →

BP Says `Top Kill’ Hasn’t Stopped Oil-Well Leak, Explores Other Options

May 29, 2010

By David Wethe May 29 (Bloomberg) — BP Plc said it’s considering switching to a new strategy to cap a leaking oil well in the Gulf of Mexico after a three-day effort to stop the leak with a blast of pressurized fluids has so far been unsuccessful. Since Wednesday, BP has been starting and stopping high- horsepower pumps that ram mixtures of mud-like drilling fluid and rubber scrap into the oil and gas that’s been gushing for more than five weeks, a process known as “top kill.” At a press conference today, Doug Suttles , the BP executive in charge of the spill response, said the top kill strategy so far has not worked and talked about the possibility of a new containment device known as a lower-marine riser package cap. “To date, it hasn’t yet stopped the flow,” he said. “As we speak, the team is assessing the results so far and trying to make a decision: should we continue with the operation, or actually should we move to the LMRP cap?” The cap would attach to the top of the well’s blowout preventer and essentially funnel oil and gas from the well to a pipe that extends up to a ship on the surface, Jon Pack, a BP spokesman, said today in a telephone interview. The next step after the lower-marine riser package cap would be to install another blowout preventer on top of the existing one, Suttles said. “It’s not going well,” Tad Patzek , chairman of the Petroleum and Geosystems Engineering Department at the University of Texas at Austin, said yesterday after reviewing a live video of the leak. “You have more or less the equivalent of six fire hoses blasting oil and gas upwards and two fire hoses blasting mud down,” Patzek said. “They are losing the competition.” Six state agencies in Louisiana said today they’ve asked BP for $300 million to lessen the impact from the oil spill on its communities. To contact the reporter on this story: David Wethe in Houston at dwethe@bloomberg.net .

Read the full article →

Video: Attorney Burns Says SEC Is `Stepping Up’ Enforcement: Video

May 28, 2010

May 28 (Bloomberg) — Douglas Burns, a formal federal prosecutor, talks with Bloomberg’s Mark Crumpton and Lori Rothman about the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s oversight of financial markets. Burns also discusses Pequot Capital Management Inc.’s payment of $28 million to settle a lawsuit filed against it by the SEC and the possibility that Goldman Sachs Group Inc. may settle. (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

SAFER: The Vitter Amendment Breaches the Banking/Commerce Barrier

May 17, 2010

Jane D’Arista SAFER (Economists’ Committee for Stable, Accountable, Fair and Efficient Financial Reform) & Political Economy Research Institute, University of Massachusetts, Amherst It’s no surprise that financial reform is being resisted by the financial system. Many firms – especially the largest – want things to remain as they are. Change brings uncertainly. But their resistance also reflects failure to acknowledge how the practices under scrutiny by Congress and the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission brought on the Great Recession that devastated households’ jobs and savings, the economy as a whole and the fiscal position of the US government. It should also come as not surprise that, as the reform effort opens up of the statutes governing financial activities, there will be opportunities to slip in provisions that would not only weaken that effort but even bring about the opposite outcome: further, dangerous deregulation. Both kinds of efforts have been underway since the House and Senate bills were introduced. For example, the large investment banks that found it necessary to become bank holding companies are trying to weaken the constraints in the BHC Act. While their bank-like activities required – and will continue to require – the liquidity support that only the Fed can give, they view limits on interactions between different lines of business a hindrance to their customary free-wheeling amalgamation of activities and the opportunities for conflicts of interest (and profits) it provides. But while the surviving large investment banks and the commercial banks that acquired their failing competitors are pushing back at reform efforts in order to preserve this sector’s less-regulated status, other large institutions have found champions for new efforts to break down regulatory barriers. There can be no doubt that the American people want financial reform and it would be a terrible irony and betrayal of their expectations if adoption of the Vitter amendment succeeds in removing one of the most critical elements in US financial structure: the prohibition against mixing banking and commerce. While the sustained effort to erode the Glass-Steagall barrier between commercial and investment banking culminated in the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999, the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 and the Amendments of 1970 have been reasonably successful in keeping banks from owning businesses and businesses from owning banks. Now, however, the Vitter amendment would break down the 1970 restrictions which, as President Nixon noted at the time, protected the US system from the anti-market practices inherent in Japan’s “zaibatsu” style banking structure. Its provisions would allow non-financial companies to have bank-like finance affiliates as long as finance is not the “predominant” activity of the overall company. But the definition of “predominant” allows 85 percent of the firm’s total revenue to come from its financial activities. The great majority of US businesses do not need the Vitter loophole. The major oil companies make only a tiny fraction of their income from interest and fees on credit cards issued to customers to buy fuel. Most manufacturers and retailers provide credit to customers to buy the goods they make or sell, earn only a small amount from their credit facilities and do not compete with banks in offering credit for purposes unrelated to their primary business. But there are notable exceptions. General Motors Acceptance Corporation (GMAC) for example, was one of the largest mortgage lenders before the crisis and received $12.5 billion in TARP capital even though its parent company, General Motors, was not “predominantly” engaged in financial activities. GE Capital is another, even more egregious example. With $620 billion in assets at year-end 2007, its lending activities were larger than those of all but the biggest banks. But, as a non-depository institution, the scale of the short-term borrowing it needed to support those assets made it the largest US issuer of commercial paper. Like GMAC, its lending was not confined to facilitating the sale of its parent company’s products. It bought a sub-prime mortgage lender, WMC Mortgage, and competes with banks in lending to unrelated businesses. As the crisis unfolded and the commercial paper market froze up, questions about GE Capital’s balance sheet intensified its problems. Regulators’ assessment of the threat it posed to the system led to its becoming the second largest beneficiary of the FDIC’s unprecedented debt guarantee program. These shadow banks operated without oversight and the cost to the economy was enormous. The Vitter amendment perpetuates this regime, potentially providing a loophole for entities like GE Capital and GMAC that would allow them to operate without the regulatory oversight needed to prevent a repetition of the systemic threat these companies posed in 2008. Equally alarming is the possibility – nay, the probability – that other versions of GE Capital and GMAC will emerge to threaten the system. Under these provisions, a large commercial company could form a non-bank holding company by buying or expanding an existing finance affiliate that could reach a size comparable to – or even larger than – all but the biggest bank holding companies. Another possibility is that a big non-bank financial company could escape its existing regulatory yoke by buying a small non-financial company – a chain of health clubs, for example, or a manufacturer of sports equipment – that would account for at least 15 percent of its total revenue. In either case, the lending activities of the finance arm would be supported by borrowing short-term liabilities eligible for purchase by money market funds – a major funding source for the shadow banking system – and would perpetuate the potential for the kind of systemic disruption that was at the center of the 2008 crisis. The Vitter amendment must be defeated. Replacing “substantially” with “predominantly” to define the level of financial activity permitted for non-financial firms may seem like no more than a relatively small change in wording. In reality, it is a change that threatens to erase those structural elements that have ensured a fair, open and competitive US financial system – one that accommodates the needs of all borrowers, depositors and investors rather than those of large financial and non-financial corporations.

Read the full article →

Merkel’s Coalition Steps Up Calls for `Orderly Insolvencies’ of EU States

May 4, 2010

By Tony Czuczka May 4 (Bloomberg) — German Chancellor Angela Merkel ’s coalition stepped up calls for allowing the “orderly” default of euro-region member states to avoid any repeat of the Greek fiscal crisis. The parliamentary leaders of the three coalition parties agreed in Berlin today to put a resolution to parliament alongside the bill on Greek aid calling for the European Union to revise rules for the euro to put pressure on countries that run deficits. Merkel said in an interview with ARD television late yesterday that it’s time to learn lessons from the Greek bailout and raised the option of “an orderly insolvency” as a way to make sure creditors participate in any future rescue. “We want to move from crisis management to crisis prevention,” Birgit Homburger , the parliamentary head of Merkel’s Free Democratic coalition partner, told reporters in Berlin after the coalition leaders meeting. “We have to do everything we can to ensure we never get into such a situation again.” Volker Kauder , the floor leader of Merkel’s Christian Democrats, said that the European Commission, the EU’s executive body, must be able to better examine the finances of member states to avert any rerun of what happened in Greece. “We quite urgently need something for the members of European Monetary Union that we also didn’t have during the banking crisis two years ago,” Finance Minister Wolfgang Schaeuble told reporters yesterday. “Namely the possibility of a restructuring procedure in the event of looming insolvency that helps prevent systemic contagion risks.” To contact the reporter on this story: Tony Czuczka in Berlin at aczuczka@bloomberg.net

Read the full article →

Francine McKenna: Key Indicator for Repurchase Risk Losses? Audited By KPMG

April 30, 2010

“It’s Like Déjà Vu All Over Again!” January 30, 2010, Wall Street Journal : Fannie, Freddie Chase Bad Mortgages Lenders Like BofA, J.P. Morgan Repurchase Billions in Faulty Loans; Just a Drop in the Default Pool Stuck with about $300 billion in loans to borrowers at least 90 days behind on payments, Fannie and Freddie have unleashed armies of auditors and other employees to sift through mortgage files for proof of underwriting flaws. The two mortgage-finance companies are flexing their muscles to force banks to repurchase loans found to contain improper documentation about a borrower’s income or outright lies. April 14, 2010, FT Alphaville: “…these repurchases are something to watch out for as JP Morgan reports Q1 earnings on Wednesday. The bank said in its last (2009) 10-k filing that: In 2009, the costs of repurchasing mortgage loans that had been sold to government agencies such as Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae increased substantially for JPM, and could continue to increase substantially further. Accordingly, Equity Research 15 repurchase and/or indemnity obligations to government-sponsored enterprises or to private third-party purchasers could materially and adversely affect its results of operations and earnings in the future. It anticipates that its 2010 revenue could be negatively affected by elevated levels of repurchases of mortgages previously sold to GSEs.” If you are a regular reader of this site, you may remember the first time I warned you about the poor disclosure practices surrounding repurchase risk. It was all the way back in March of 2007 and I was referring to the lack of disclosures surrounding New Century Financial. In a filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission on Monday, New Century said lenders including Bank of America, Barclays, Citigroup, Credit Suisse, Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley had issued letters saying the company was in default. New Century also said its bankers had demanded that it accelerate its obligation to buy back outstanding mortgage loans financed under the lending arrangements. New Century said if its bankers demanded accelerated repurchase of all outstanding mortgages, it would cost the company $8.4bn, which it does not have… I looked quickly at the 2005 Annual Report for New Century to find out who their auditors are and to see how “rapid” this decline really was. Interestingly, besides noticing that KPMG now has another worry at its doorstep, I didn’t see too much in the way of discussion in the “Risks” section of the risk that is now causing this worldwide financial crisis. There are 17 pages of discussion of general and REIT specific risk associated with this company, but no mention of the specific risk of the potential for their banks to accelerate the repurchase of mortgage loans financed under their significant number of lending arrangements. Although there is a detailed discussion of these lending arrangements later in the report, it does not seem that reserves or capital/liquidity requirements were sufficient to cover the possibility that one of or more lenders could for some reason decide to call the loans…Didn’t someone think that this would be a very big number (US 8.4 billion) if that happened? New Century failed. There was a very detailed, well-done bankruptcy examiner’s report on that one, too. Mr. Missal pointed the finger at KPMG for not heeding the advice of their own experts, a la Andersen/Enron. Instead of the KPMG partner telling the client that their models for estimating potential losses were flawed, the partner told the staff to shut up and move on. KPMG is now being sued for $1 billion for its sins at New Century. Donna Kardos in the WSJ: The lawsuits filed Wednesday said that specialists at KPMG tried to point out errors in New Century’s financial statements but were silenced by the KPMG partner in charge of the audits “to protect KPMG’s business relationship with, and fees from, New Century.” The claims are among the first to attempt to blame auditors for the subprime-mortgage crisis, which spread beyond lenders such as New Century and engulfed the global financial system. If the New Century trustee is successful, “it may embolden others to look more closely at the possibility of bringing [accounting] firms to some level of culpability for the things that happened,” that led to the credit crisis, Francine McKenna, president of McKenna Partners LLC, a corporate-governance consultancy, said in an interview. I warned you again seven months ago that another KPMG client, Wachovia/Wells Fargo, has the same poor disclosure of repurchase risk. Did Wells Fargo’s Auditors Miss Repurchase Risk? How does the New Century situation and KPMG’s role in it remind me of Wells Fargo now? Well, in both cases, there’s no disclosure of the quantity and quality of the repurchase risk to the organization…The lack of disclosure of this issue here mirrors the lack of disclosure in New Century and perhaps in other KPMG clients such at Citigroup, Countrywide (now inside Bank of America) and others. How do I know there could be a pattern? Because the inspections of KPMG by the PCAOB , their regulator, tell us they have been cited for auditing deficiencies just like this. Do we have to wait for another post-failure lawsuit to bring some sense, and some sunshine, to the system? The latest announcements of potentially material losses due to forced repurchases of mortgages from Fannie Mae (Deloitte) and Freddie Mac (PwC) were made JP Morgan and Bank of America – both audited by PwC. The biggest losers are likely to be Bank of America Corp., J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. and other mortgage lenders when the housing bubble burst… Bank of America repurchased nearly $4.5 billion of loans during the first nine months of 2009, according to data compiled by Barclays. That was triple the $1.5 billion repurchased in all of 2008. Some of the bad mortgages were made by Countrywide Financial Corp., which was acquired by the Charlotte, N.C., bank in 2008. A bank spokeswoman declined to comment. At J.P. Morgan, total buyback demands surged to $5.3 billion in 2009 from $4 billion in 2008, according to Barclays. The New York company, which bought the failed banking operations of Washington Mutual Inc.(Deloitte) in 2008, reported higher reserves for loan repurchases in the fourth quarter… J.P. Morgan and Bank of America don’t disclose how many loans they repurchased from Fannie and Freddie. Countrywide , now owned by Bank of America, was a KPMG client. Maybe y’all should kick the tires a little more on Citibank’s big comeback . Citi is the only big money center bank left that is audited by KPMG. Recent testimony before the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission says their underwriting standards fell apart between 2005-2007.

Read the full article →

Citigroup First-Quarter Profit More Than Doubles as Bad-Loan Costs Decline

April 19, 2010

By Bradley Keoun April 19 (Bloomberg) — Citigroup Inc. posted its fourth profit in five quarters, beating analysts’ estimates as bad-loan costs declined. First-quarter net income of $4.43 billion followed a loss of $7.58 billion in the fourth quarter and a profit of $1.59 billion in the first three months of 2009, New York-based Citigroup said today in a statement. Adjusted per-share earnings were 14 cents. Analysts in a Bloomberg survey estimated the company would break even. Chief Executive Officer Vikram Pandit , who is taking a $1 annual salary until the company turns consistently profitable, said in February that 2010 may show the “earnings potential of the new Citi” after two straight annual losses totaling $29 billion. JPMorgan Chase & Co.’s first-quarter profit climbed 55 percent from a year earlier, and Bank of America Corp.’s fell 25 percent. “Credit conditions have improved fairly dramatically, and investment-banking revenues are even stronger than everyone had anticipated,” said William Fitzpatrick , a financial-industry analyst with Optique Capital Management, which oversees about $800 million, including JPMorgan and Bank of America shares. The report will be “viewed very favorably.” Citigroup, which had to get a $45 billion bailout in 2008, repaid $20 billion of the funds in December. The remaining $25 billion was converted by the Treasury Department into 7.7 billion Citigroup shares , which have a market value of about $35 billion. Accounting Rule The bank booked a $2.5 billion gain in early 2009 from accounting rules that allow companies to profit when their own creditworthiness declines. The rules reflect the possibility that a company could buy back its own liabilities at a discount, which under traditional accounting methods would result in a profit. In the first quarter of this year, Citigroup’s creditworthiness was little changed, based on prices in the credit-default market, which investors can use to protect themselves against a bond default. On March 31, the annual rate to insure $10 million of Citigroup’s bonds for five years was $156,360, 2 percent lower than at the start of the quarter, according to Bloomberg data. To contact the reporters on this story: Bradley Keoun in New York at bkeoun@bloomberg.net .

Read the full article →

Citigroup First-Quarter Profit More Than Doubles as Bad-Loan Costs Decline

April 19, 2010

By Bradley Keoun April 19 (Bloomberg) — Citigroup Inc. posted its fourth profit in five quarters, beating analysts’ estimates as bad-loan costs declined. First-quarter net income of $4.43 billion followed a loss of $7.58 billion in the fourth quarter and a profit of $1.59 billion in the first three months of 2009, New York-based Citigroup said today in a statement. Adjusted per-share earnings were 14 cents. Analysts in a Bloomberg survey estimated the company would break even. Chief Executive Officer Vikram Pandit , who is taking a $1 annual salary until the company turns consistently profitable, said in February that 2010 may show the “earnings potential of the new Citi” after two straight annual losses totaling $29 billion. JPMorgan Chase & Co.’s first-quarter profit climbed 55 percent from a year earlier, and Bank of America Corp.’s fell 25 percent. “Credit conditions have improved fairly dramatically, and investment-banking revenues are even stronger than everyone had anticipated,” said William Fitzpatrick , a financial-industry analyst with Optique Capital Management, which oversees about $800 million, including JPMorgan and Bank of America shares. The report will be “viewed very favorably.” Citigroup, which had to get a $45 billion bailout in 2008, repaid $20 billion of the funds in December. The remaining $25 billion was converted by the Treasury Department into 7.7 billion Citigroup shares , which have a market value of about $35 billion. Accounting Rule The bank booked a $2.5 billion gain in early 2009 from accounting rules that allow companies to profit when their own creditworthiness declines. The rules reflect the possibility that a company could buy back its own liabilities at a discount, which under traditional accounting methods would result in a profit. In the first quarter of this year, Citigroup’s creditworthiness was little changed, based on prices in the credit-default market, which investors can use to protect themselves against a bond default. On March 31, the annual rate to insure $10 million of Citigroup’s bonds for five years was $156,360, 2 percent lower than at the start of the quarter, according to Bloomberg data. To contact the reporters on this story: Bradley Keoun in New York at bkeoun@bloomberg.net .

Read the full article →

Poland’s Zloty Still `Too Strong’ After Central Bank Action, Kotecki Says

April 17, 2010

By Agnes Lovasz and Dorota Bartyzel April 17 (Bloomberg) — The Polish zloty remains “too strong,” even after the central bank intervened in the market to help stall the currency’s appreciation, Deputy Finance Minister Ludwik Kotecki said. “At this stage of the recovery, the zloty is probably too strong and for sure further appreciation of the zloty should be avoided,” Kotecki said in an interview today in Madrid at a meeting of European Union finance ministers. “The recovery is not well grounded and risks still exist. Too strong a zloty would be negative.” He declined to speculate on what the best exchange rate would be for Poland’s economy. The central bank of Poland last week carried out its first intervention in 12 years. The currency’s gains are hurting exporters in the biggest of the EU’s eastern members by making Polish goods more expensive abroad and cutting the value of their sales in local currency. “We support the central bank in this activity,” Kotecki said. “We cross our fingers for successful interventions.” The zloty fell 0.5 percent yesterday to close at 3.8794 against the euro. The Polish economy has improved enough to lift revenue from value-added tax, which should lead to a lower deficit this year than envisaged in the budget law, Kotecki said. Based on “better-than-expected” March revenue, “the possibility is increasing,” he said. This Year “The deficit this year should be lower by some 15 billion zloty ($5.2 billion) mainly because of revenue,” Kotecki said. The government originally planned for a 50 billion-zloty shortfall. The budget balance will also be better as the economy is growing at about a 3 percent annual rate and inflation will be above 2 percent this year. The government’s assumptions when drafting the budget were for 1.2 percent growth and 1 percent inflation. “We are very positive looking into the future because macroeconomic activity is improving and now we see taxes are improving,” Kotecki said. To contact the reporters responsible for this story: Agnes Lovasz in Madrid at alovasz@bloomberg.net ; Dorota Bartyzel in Warsaw at dbartyzel@bloomberg.net .

Read the full article →

Mike Elk: Some Workers the Free Market Just Won’t Hire

April 13, 2010

With the Local Jobs for America Act putting the possibility of direct government hiring back on the table, we must make sure any hiring programs actually reach the communities that need help most. In this recession, there are four distinct groups of people that have been hit the hardest: * Non-College Graduates – Adults with only a high school diploma have more than twice the unemployment rate (10.8 percent) of adults with a bachelor’s degree (4.7 percent). With so many skilled workers out of work, why would companies spend additional money hiring and training unskilled workers? Unfortunately though, if no one steps up to invest in young workers, we will create an entire generation of people with no skills to thrive in the 21st century economy * Young and Old – Unemployment among workers between the ages of 20-24 is at almost 15 percent. But we can’t forget about older workers too. We tend to be complacent because workers over 55 are in the least likely demographic to lose their jobs. However, when they do become unemployed, people over 55 have the hardest time finding new work than any other age demographic. With so many skilled workers out of work, why would companies spend additional money hiring and training unskilled workers? They simply won’t spend money training new workers. Unfortunately, if no one steps up to invest in young workers, we will create an entire generation of people with no skills to thrive in the 21st century economy. * People of Color – African American males have an unemployment rate of 19% while white males have an unemployment rate of only 9%. Equally as troubling, African Americans workers with a bachelor’s degree are twice as likely to be unemployed as whites workers with one. Does the free market have any interest in fixing the problems of the wage gap between African Americans and whites? No, the market has an interest intensifying the gap because it lowers workers’ wages overall. * Long Term Unemployed – More than 6.5 million workers have been unemployed for longer than six months – nearly 44% of all unemployed workers . Employers are hesitant to hire workers who are out of work for more than six months because they lose skills and are seen as undesirable. Does the free market have any interest in helping out the long term unemployed? No, the market hires only those workers that it views as the most qualified and desirable. When we can’t rely on private employers to achieve the public interest, that’s precisely when our government should step up. This is why the Local Jobs for America Act and direct government hiring is so important. The Local Jobs for America Act has provisions that allow money to flow to communities that have been particularly hard hit by the jobs crisis. Additionally, the Local Jobs for America Act has provisions to provide on-the-site training for unskilled workers. Direct government hiring like the Local Jobs for America Act can correct the problems of the labor market that the free market won’t.

Read the full article →

James Love: Corporate Special Interests for Controls on Campaign Spending?

April 10, 2010

In Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, the US Supreme Court has presented the United States with an astonishing future — one of unlimited spending on campaigns by corporations. No developed country has faced this possibility — it is really uncharted waters, even for a political system as openly corrupt as the current one. We are facing the possibility of a true failed state, which can lose any semblance of ethics or democratic responsiveness to the public interest or good government. In the past presidential election, the Obama ticket spent about $730 million, and the McCain ticket spent about $333 million, or $1.063 billion. The combined total was less than one month of the sales of Lipitor, a single patented pharmaceutical drug sold by Pfizer, or a little more than one percent of sales for Exxon Mobil in the 4th quarter of 2009. The total spending on the 2006 Congressional election was $2,9 billion, less than one quarter of revenue for Haliburton, a firm heavily dependent upon government policy and contacts. Given the benefits of “owning” shares of members of Congress, it is hard to predict the equilibrium of this market, but it certainly will involve corruption of biblical proportions, bad government decision making, and vast outlays to exercise parity with competing “investors” in influence. Clearly there is a need for reform. The traditional civil society sector where I work is weak these days, and no one high up in the White House or the Congress seems to be breaking a sweat to fix the problem either. One possible strategy for reform is to mobilize political support from the very entities that have created the mess in the first place — the corporate special interests. The argument runs as follows. While there may be short term gains in openly buying influence, the longer run scenario makes everyone worse off. Over the top corruption has hardly been good for economic development anywhere. And, when everyone can do it, the competition will drive up the price of influence, dissipating the very profits companies hope to make. Right now the U.S.A. is the biggest profit center in the world for most companies. Can they really afford for the United States to enter a predictable slide into a third rate economic power? And how much of their quarterly profits do they want to allocate to financing television ads for politicians who rarely stay bought. Maybe as the momentous consequences of the Citizens United Decision become more obvious and concrete, Exxon, Pfizer, Disney and others will start bribing Congress and the President to put some reasonable limits on the amount of the bribes it is legal to accept — acting not out of concern for democracy or the public interest, but for the bottom line.

Read the full article →

Video: New York City’s Liu Discusses Wall Street Bonus Tax: Video

April 9, 2010

April 9 (Bloomberg) — New York City Comptroller John Liu talks with Bloomberg’s Betty Liu about the possibility of tax increases on Wall Street bonuses and the city’s budget gap. (This is an excerpt of the full interview. Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Man Group Said to Mull Deals With SAC and GLG – New York Times (blog)

March 26, 2010

The Business Insider Man Group Said to Mull Deals With SAC and GLG New York Times (blog) In its discussions with SAC, Man Group raised the possibility of taking a stake in the $12 billion hedge fund founded by Mr. Cohen, or perhaps distributing … Man sounds out US hedge funds Financial Times Man Group Said to Talk With SAC, GLG in Search for US Deals BusinessWeek Man Group reportedly considers deals with GLG, SAC MarketWatch The Business Insider

Read the full article →

Video: Kraemer Sees IMF Taking ‘Assistant’ Role in Greece Aid: Video

March 19, 2010

March 19 (Bloomberg) — Joerg Kraemer, chief economist at Commerzbank AG, talks with Bloomberg’s Deirdre Bolton about the possible role the International Monetary Fund may have in aiding Greece. Kraemer also discusses Germany’s and the European Union’s positions toward a Greece bailout and the possibility that Greece may not need aid. (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Huff TV: Arianna, Phil Angelides Discuss Financial Reform Legislation With Dylan Ratigan (VIDEO)

March 16, 2010

Arianna appeared on Dylan Ratigan’s MSNBC show this afternoon, all with Phil Angelides, the chair of the Financial Crisis Commission, to discuss whether Washington is capable of producing financial reform that will prevent big Wall Street banks from recklessly putting the entire system at risk. Citing Tom Friedman, Arianna noted that in Washington We have these major problems but we are only geared to produce sub-optimum solutions. We are constantly producing these sub-optimum solutions and they are not going to be good enough because the financial architecture is so flawed that unless we fundamentally change it, as even Chris Dodd admitted, we are not going to eliminate the possibility of a future meltdown of the magnitude that we faced before. And unless we deal with derivatives, and we really regulate derivatives and basically end the casino gambling — what will happen is the casino gambling leads once again to the major meltdown that we faced in ’08. WATCH:

Read the full article →

Honda Recalls 410,000 Vehicles Over Faulty Brake System

March 16, 2010

Honda has recalled more than 400,000 vehicles over concerns of brake failure, according to several news reports today. While Honda’s announcement pales in comparison to Toyota’s recall of 8.5 million vehicles , its part of a growing number of automaker concerns about the possibility of faulty brake systems. Here’s the AP: The recall includes 344,000 Odysseys and 68,000 Elements from the 2007 and 2008 model years. Honda said in a statement that over time, brake pedals can feel “soft” and must be pressed closer to the floor to stop the vehicles. Left unrepaired, the problem could cause loss of braking power and possibly a crash, Honda spokesman Chris Martin said. “It’s definitely not operating the way it should, and it’s safety systems, so it brings it to the recall status,” he said. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration has reported three crashes due to the problem with minor injuries and no deaths, Martin said. Honda notified NHTSA of the recall on Monday, he said. The problems with uncontrolled acceleration acceleration seem to not be limited to Toyota. As Bloomberg noted yesterday , American automakers may also have had brake issues. Here’s Bloomberg: U.S. regulators have tracked more deaths in vehicles made by Ford Motor Co., Chrysler Group LLC and other companies combined than by Toyota Motor Corp. during three decades of unintended acceleration reviews that often blamed human error. The agency received 15,174 complaints involving unintended acceleration in the past decade and has run 141 investigations of the phenomenon since 1980, closing 112 of them without corrective action. NHTSA’s repeated conclusion that crashes occurred because drivers mistakenly stomped the accelerator became a policy position that caused investigators to take complaints of runaway vehicles less seriously than they should have, safety advocates say. Here’s more from the AP: Drivers who fear that they’ve lost braking power should have their dealer check the brakes sooner, Martin said. The dealer can “bleed” air bubbles out of the hydraulic lines, which should fix the problem until the parts arrive for the final repair, he said. Honda technicians will put plastic caps and sealant over two small holes in the device to stop the air from getting in, Martin said. The automaker is still preparing a list of affected vehicles. After April 19, owners can determine if their vehicles are being recalled by going to or by calling (800) 999-1009, and selecting option number four. http://www.recalls.honda.com

Read the full article →

Chile May Tap Savings as Earthquake Losses Near $30 Billion, Pinera Says

March 12, 2010

By Sebastian Boyd March 12 (Bloomberg) — Chile plans to tap its copper savings funds and borrow in international debt markets to pay for an estimated $30 billion in reconstruction from the 8.8- magnitude earthquake that struck the country on Feb. 27. “We don’t have a definitive estimate, but estimates indicate that the damage caused by this earthquake could be close to $30 billion,” President Sebastian Pinera told reporters in Santiago today. Pinera plans to rewrite the 2010 budget to free up resources for a reconstruction fund, he said. The government will also tap its savings, he said. Chile has $11.3 billion invested overseas in an economic stabilization fund that the government can use to finance a budget deficit. Using money from the fund could mean selling dollars to buy pesos, boosting the Chilean currency. “We will study the possibility of contracting debts overseas,” Pinera said. “Chile has hardly any public sector debt.” The high price of Chile’s main export, copper, may also help pay for reconstruction, the president said. Pinera took office yesterday. To contact the reporter on this story: Sebastian Boyd in Santiago at sboyd9@bloomberg.net

Read the full article →

Toyota Hearing: Driver To Describe Six Miles Of Nonstop Terror

February 23, 2010

WASHINGTON — Rhonda Smith’s story of six miles of interstate terror, as her Lexus suddenly zoomed to 100 miles per hour, will set the mood Tuesday for the first congressional hearing on Toyota’s acceleration problems. The Sevierville, Tenn., woman shifted to neutral. She tried to throw the car into reverse. She hit the emergency brake. Nothing. Then, her Toyota-made car miraculously slowed down before she crashed. Smith’s description of her nightmare ride in October 2006 will precede testimony by safety experts, Toyota’s U.S. president and the secretary of transportation Tuesday. Members of the House Energy and Commerce Committee’s investigative panel will be armed with preliminary staff findings that Toyota and the government failed to protect the public. Rep. Bart Stupak, D-Mich., chairman of the subcommittee, wrote Toyota that the company misled the public by failing to reveal that misplaced floor mats and sticking gas pedals accounted for only some of the acceleration problems. He said the company resisted the possibility that electronics problems were the cause. And he told Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood in a letter that his agency lacked the expertise and will to thoroughly investigate Toyota, which has recalled 8.5 million vehicles to fix acceleration problems in several models and braking issues in the 2010 hybrid Prius. Tuesday’s hearing, along with a second House hearing Wednesday, present a high bar in the company’s attempts to convince the public it cares about safety. James Lentz, president and chief operating officer of Toyota Motor Sales U.S.A. Inc., won’t have the benefit of speaking to consumers in company ads Tuesday. Rather, he’ll have to convince customers of company sincerity while facing expected hostile questioning from lawmakers venting their anger before television cameras. The atmosphere outside the hearing won’t be pleasant for the company, either. Toyota revealed Monday that federal prosecutors and the Securities and Exchange Commission are now investigating the company’s safety problems and what it told government investigators. On Wednesday, the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform will hear from company president Akio Toyoda, who is expected to speak to the committee through a translator. In an opinion piece published by The Wall Street Journal, Toyoda acknowledged that the automaker had stumbled badly. “It is clear to me that in recent years we didn’t listen as carefully as we should – or respond as quickly as we must – to our customers’ concerns,” wrote Toyoda. LaHood, who testifies Tuesday, is expected to assure Americans that the government is addressing the possibility that electromagnetic interference played a role in the acceleration problems. LaHood also will remind Americans that his agency is investigating whether Toyota acted quickly enough in reporting defects and took appropriate action to protect consumers. The government has demanded that the company turn over a wide range of documents. Stupak said Monday that documents and interviews demonstrate that Toyota relied on a flawed engineering report to reassure the public that it had found the answer to the acceleration problem. In his letter to Toyota, he said a review of consumer complaints shows company personnel identified sticking pedals or floor mats as the cause of only 16 percent of the unintended acceleration reports. Some 70 percent of the acceleration incidents in Toyota’s customer call database involved vehicles that are not subject to the 2009 and 2010 floor mat and “sticky pedal” recalls. In a letter to LaHood, Stupak raised questions about whether the transportation agency lacked the expertise to review defects in vehicle electronics and said it was slow to respond to 2,600 complaints of sudden unintended acceleration from 2000 to 2010. As regulators looked into reports that accelerator pedals were becoming jammed in floor mats on Lexus ES350 sedans, a Toyota safety official told colleagues that government officials didn’t appear concerned. “I ran into a lot of different investigators and (Office of Defect Investigations) staff and when asked why I was there, when I told them for the (Lexus) ES350 floor mats, they either laughed or rolled their eyes in disbelief,” wrote Chris Santucci, a former government transportation safety employee.

Read the full article →

Swine Flu May Have Infected Every Second Schoolchild in U.S., Study Finds

February 22, 2010

By Jason Gale Feb. 22 (Bloomberg) — Swine flu may have infected at least 63 million people in the U.S. last year, according to a study in Pittsburgh, where almost every second schoolchild probably caught the pandemic virus. Blood tests on Pittsburgh residents found 45 percent of people aged 10 to 19 years had antibodies against the new H1N1 flu strain . About 22 percent of people across all groups developed immunity to the virus by early December and a quarter of those born in the 1920s may have already had protective antibodies before the pandemic resulting from prior flu infection, researchers at the University of Pittsburgh found. The findings, reported online yesterday in the Public Library of Science , suggest a fresh wave of swine flu infections isn’t likely unless the virus mutates or people become more susceptible to infection. A World Health Organization advisory panel is holding a teleconference tomorrow to discuss whether the first influenza pandemic in 41 years has peaked. “With current estimates of seroprevalence and continued increases in population due to vaccination, a significant change in viral antigens or a change in population immunity would be required for further disease spread,” Ted Ross, associate professor of microbiology at the university, and colleagues wrote. “We cannot rule out the possibility that geographical pockets of limited immunity may be present in which a third wave may yet occur.” Symptom-Free Cases At least 15,921 people have died from swine flu as the fast-moving pandemic spread to 212 countries and territories since its discovery in North America in April, the WHO said in a Feb. 19 statement . The global tally underestimates the actual number as many deaths are never tested or recognized as influenza related, the Geneva-based agency said. In yesterday’s study, researchers looked for infection- fighting antibodies against the 2009 pandemic flu strain in 846 anonymous blood samples collected in November and early December from people in southwestern Pennsylvania’s Allegheny County ages 1 month to 90 years. The tests identified people who caught the virus, including those who didn’t develop a fever, cough or other flu-like symptoms. The researchers compared the results against tests on blood samples collected in 2008, of which 6 percent contained antibodies that protected against swine flu, probably as a result of infection from a related influenza strain. Children and adolescents in the 10- to 19-year age group had the highest prevalence of swine flu antibodies, while 29 percent of blood samples from children younger than 9 years tested positive. Residents in the 70- to 79-year age group had the lowest prevalence rate of 5 percent. When the researchers extrapolated their findings across the county’s 1.2 million residents, they found swine flu antibodies in 21.5 percent of people, including more than 70,000 school-age children. “Extrapolating these results further to the entire US population, we estimate that 63 million persons became infected in 2009,” the authors wrote. To contact the reporter on this story: Jason Gale in Singapore at j.gale@bloomberg.net

Read the full article →

James Boyce: A Serving Of Egg On Your Face With Your Tea Sir?

February 19, 2010

I had a dog once. Smart dog, a Scottish terrier. Well, he wasn’t completely brilliant – he had this not-so-smart habit of running off our deck chasing seagulls. Which was really a problem because it’s about twelve feet from the front of our deck to the ground. Imagine a summer of bark bark bark, silence, and then squealing as he hit the ground. I thought of him today when I read the news out of the UK when their economists just missed the estimates of January tax revenue, proving that idiot economists don’t just leave here in the States. One of my pet peeves of the recent economic downturn has been the drumbeat of missed economic predictions when a survey of twenty leading economists predicts A and then it comes in at M only to be asked again for their prediction. They bark bark bark, and then are momentarily silent, only to squeal when the actual numbers come out, but still somehow we listen to their barking again. But I must take pride in my economic countrymen, the English economists, well, they don’t just miss a little, they figure if you are going to blow an economic prediction, well, just go ahead and miss. From today’s London Times , Gordon Brown’s launch of a Labour election campaign promising economic recovery was in jeopardy last night as a record slump in tax receipts fuelled fears that Britain could slip back into recession. Official figures showed that the Treasury borrowed another £4.3 billion last month. It is the first time since records began in 1993 that the nation has been in the red in January, traditionally the month when government coffers are swelled by big tax receipts. Obviously this is concerning, raising the possibility of a second recession in the UK and believe it or not elevating the UK deficit right up there with….Greece. But what were the economists predicting? Hah. Economists, who had expected a surplus of about £2.8 billion, sounded renewed alarm, with some saying Britain’s deficit could exceed Greece’s. That’s beautiful. You’re talking a single month. Leading economists missed it by 7.1 billion POUNDS. That’s a 15 BILLION DOLLAR WHIFF. You want to know what’s happening with the economy on London or here in the States, here’s a little advice. If a survey of leading economists believes something, don’t.

Read the full article →

North Korea to Release American Missionary in Sign of Improved Relations

February 4, 2010

By Bomi Lim Feb. 5 (Bloomberg) — North Korea said it will release an American missionary who was detained in December for illegal entry, an indication the communist country is seeking to maintain improved relations with the U.S. North Korea decided to release Robert Park after his “sincere repentance of his wrongdoings,” the state-run Korean Central News Agency said today. Park was detained on Dec. 24 for illegally crossing into the country from China, KCNA said on Dec. 29. No details were given on his release. Park’s release came after U.S. President Barack Obama two days ago decided to keep North Korea off the government’s list of states that sponsor terrorism. North Korean leader Kim Jong Il left open the possibility of a possible return to six-nation nuclear disarmament talks after U.S. envoy Stephen Bosworth traveled to Pyongyang in December. The United Nations has described Park as an American missionary who entered North Korea to protest the country’s prison system. The country is holding another American, who KCNA has said was detained on Jan. 25 for illegal entry. The second detainee’s identity remains unknown. KCNA issued a statement from Park saying: “I seriously repented of the wrong I committed.” Thawing Relations Former U.S. President Bill Clinton traveled to Pyongyang in August to secure the release of two American journalists who were arrested in March 2009 near the border with China. Clinton’s trip, which included a meeting with Kim, helped thaw relations between North Korea and the U.S., leading to Bosworth’s visit. Kim’s regime remains under UN Security Council sanctions for carrying out tests of missiles and nuclear devices in 2009. North Korea has said it won’t return to the six-party talks aimed at getting the country to abandon its nuclear program until the sanctions are lifted, something the Obama administration has ruled out. North Korea doesn’t meet the criteria for being included on the U.S. government’s list of states sponsoring terrorism, Obama wrote in a letter to congressional leaders on Feb. 3. Inclusion automatically imposes sanctions. North Korea, which had been on the list since 1988, was removed in 2008 after it agreed to inspection of sites suspected of being part of a nuclear program. To contact the reporter on this story: Bomi Lim in Seoul at blim30@bloomberg.net

Read the full article →

Whitacre to Remain at GM Helm as Automaker Targets June for Loan Repayment

January 25, 2010

By Katie Merx, David Welch and Jeff Green Jan. 25 (Bloomberg) — General Motors Co. Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Ed Whitacre said he will remain as CEO at the request of the board. The former AT&T Inc. chairman and CEO, who took the top spot on Dec. 1 when directors asked Fritz Henderson to step down, also said Detroit-based GM plans to repay its government loans by June. The board has discussed the possibility for a while and wanted to give the company clear leadership, said two people familiar with the matter. Directors made the decision at a special meeting last week, Whitacre said. “This takes away an air of uncertainty and lends some stability,” said Joe Phillippi , president of AutoTrends Consulting in Short Hills, New Jersey. “This move tells the troops that Whitacre is the boss and everybody should put on their helmets and march forward. Staying at the helm means Whitacre inherits responsibility for the GM turnaround effort that predates his arrival in July. He told employees on Dec. 2 he expected the search might take a year, then put his stamp on management by reshuffling senior executives and recruiting a new finance chief. Whitacre, 68, hired Chief Financial Officer Chris Liddell last month from Microsoft Corp. , where he had been CFO. He also reshuffled the automaker’s management team and hired two executives he worked with at AT&T to run GM’s lobbying activities. ‘How Long?’ “The question is how long will Ed stay around?” Phillippi said. “Liddell is obviously a candidate for the CEO job.” Whitacre said today he’ll stay “an adequate amount of time,” perhaps two or three years. The U.S. Treasury’s auto task force named Whitacre in June to lead the revamped board that took over when GM exited bankruptcy on July 10. His associates had speculated when he first took the job that he might stay on as CEO. GM had hired Chicago-based Spencer Stuart, the largest closely held executive-search firm, to look for a new CEO, a person familiar with the matter had said last month. Last year’s restructuring gives Whitacre an advantage against Ford Motor Co., which is led by CEO Alan Mulally , said Erich Merkle , president of Autoconomy LLC, an advisory firm based in Grand Rapids, Michigan. “The new CEO at GM will have an easier job than Mulally, given what the bankruptcy and government rescue has done to trim dealers, close plants and fix the balance sheet,” Merkle said. “Sure, GM can turn a profit, but will it be viable for the longer term? It’s too soon to know. That depends on whether the changes Whitacre is making are the right changes.” To contact the reporters on this story: Katie Merx in Detroit at kmerx@bloomberg.net ; David Welch in Southfield, Michigan, at dwelch12@bloomberg.net ; Jeff Green in Southfield, Michigan, at jgreen16@bloomberg.net .

Read the full article →

Dan Dorfman: How Many More Kicks In The Groin?

January 25, 2010

Go figure this balmy stock market. A week ago, investors were beaming. No wonder. It looked like we were seeing a replay of last July’s running of the bulls of Pamplona as bullish sentiment in the stock market continued to rise, while fear showed additional signs of evaporation. The spreading bullish fever is easy to understand, given the market’s blistering performance — up nearly 70% since its low of last March (about 6,500 on the Dow) — a nine-month rise that has been devoid of any meaningful interruption along the way. But suddenly, an unexpected kick in the groin, as the major averages got slammed in last week’s final three trading sessions, highlighted by a wicked 552-point drop in the Dow. Money manager Arnold Silver of Los Angeles-based A. Silver Associates considers the drop ominous. He views it as a case of reality catching up with wishful thinking, a recognition of growing turmoil in Washington, a President in hot water, and he sees lower equity prices ahead, maybe another 5% to 7% decline. “It seems to be a propitious time for everybody to cut back on underperforming stocks before the losses become more substantial,” he says. The market’s sudden selloff is attributed to a number of factors, among them a couple of new worrisome developments. They are the President’s bank bashing accompanied by some proposed new bank reforms (such as prohibiting banks from forming hedge funds, private equity funds and trading securities in their own accounts) and China’s plans to cut back on bank lending, which could slow its economic growth. Adding to the market’s woes, weekly jobless claims have risen for the second straight week, a number of recent earnings reports have come in below some Wall Street expectations, retail sales seem to be turning sluggish again and housing remains a horror show. The President’s pursuit of banking reforms even worries some of the bulls. One of them, market guru Elaine Garzarelli, says “if new bank regulations are passed, we could see a large correction.” Similar concern is also voiced at the possibility that Federal Reserve chairman Ben Bernanke might not be reappointed for a second term amid some congressional opposition. Most market observers I talk to figure he’s a shoo-in for another term, but the idea that maybe he won’t be adds to the list of concerns. Silver, for one, thinks if Bernanke is scrapped, “the Dow is easily a quick 200-250 point loser.” The key question, of course, for the nation’s more than 80 million stock investors is how many more kicks in the groin are lurking. Veteran investment adviser Martin Weiss of Weiss Research in Jupiter, Fla., for one, is convinced the kicks are far from over because the days of the rally — which he calls “a bear market rally” — are numbered. Why so? For starters, he notes, the market expects dramatic profit improvement, which is unlikely because the increases we’ve seen so far from last year’s depressed levels have hardly been inspiring. Further, he points out, the economic recovery we’ve seen so far has been bought and paid for by Washington. But those days, he believes, are history. If the President pushes for more stimulus to further beef up the economy, Congress, he says, is apt to say no because the public mood has shifted dramatically. The public, he argues, is now more concerned about the budget deficit than the economy; it now prefers restraint rather than fiscal stimulus. Weiss also contends the causes of the banking crisis have not been cured, but made worse by compounding the problems, which raises the possibility of another debt crisis. In particular, he points to the “Garden of Eden environment” Washington has created for the banks, especially for Goldman Sachs, by giving them a blank check to speculate and take more risk. Likewise, the Fed keeping interest rates at near zero percent, providing banks with cheap financing for risk-taking. Yet another criticism: allowing Morgan Stanley and Goldman to convert into commercial banks and take more risk with government guarantees. “The large bank, which is operating in a no-fail environment, is the big elephant in the room, but no one is addressing it,” Weiss says. He’s especially negative on the mega-banks, notably Bank of America and Citigroup, which, even if the government keeps them alive, he points out, can still lose money and produce stockholder losses. “It’s either fix the banks or brace for another crisis,” says Weiss. Another wary pro, Charles Biderman, CEO of West Coast liquidity tracker TrimTabs Research, offers a number of reasons why he thinks the recent selloff in stock prices is a prelude to an even bigger market decline. Chief among them: The idea we’re in a economic recovery is highly questionable because the single most important ingredient of such a recovery — signs of a rebound in wages and salaries — is conspicuously missing. Consumer borrowing is plunging. Last month, total consumer credit at commercial banks dropped18.3 billion or at a 15.1% annual rate from year-earlier levels. How, Biderman asks, can the economy grow when such borrowing is falling. The answer, he says, is that it can’t. Mortgage delinquencies show no signs of slowing, while the latest figures show 6.2 million mortgages are delinquent. Tight credit, falling wages and high gas prices are slamming the consumer. Corporations and corporate insiders, Wall Street’s so-called smart money, remain aggressive sellers of stocks. Biderman, incidentally, received a fair amount of press coverage when he charged that the market’s sharp rise was a reflection of manipulation of stock index futures by the Fed and the U.S. Treasury. At the recent running of the bulls in Pamplona, a man was gored to death. The bottom line here: regardless of what you hear from the endless number of bulls, not everything is coming up roses. So beware, you could easily get financially gored. What do you think? E-mail me at Dandordan@aol.com

Read the full article →

Jeanne Kelly: Making a Fresh Credit Start in 2010

January 8, 2010

Like everyone, I love this time of year because it seems to be filled with possibilities. When it comes to credit, however, many people feel like there’s no way around a bad score, and that the best that can be done is to wait it out. Fortunately, the possibility of an improved credit score is out there. You just need to be aware. Bad Credit If you already know that you have bad credit, it’s time for a fresh start. However hopeless you may feel right now, just being aware of what’s on your report, even when the information is bad, is good. Being in the know is better than burying your head in the sand. And knowing what’s there provides the best starting point for a plan. Begin by: 1. Ordering all three credit reports from Experian, Equifax & Trans Union. 2. Reviewing all three, looking for any inaccurate information. 3. Disputing any inaccurate information by working directly with the credit bureaus. 4. Deciding which accounts you can start paying down. 5. Putting together a plan to lower your debt. No Credit Sometimes bad credit is the consequence of having no credit. Start building new secured accounts. When the New Year rolls in next year, your new 12 month history of accounts will give your score a boost. Good Credit To those who have good or excellent credit – congratulations – but remember to still be aware of what’s being reported about you. I recently had a client who came to me three days before his mortgage closing because the bank pulled his credit, found a second address listed on his credit report, and refused to close the loan. While the address had nothing to do with him, it was a red flag to the lender. We worked with the credit bureaus to get the address removed and thankfully, once that was done, they closed the loan. As a credit coach, I want you to obtain the highest FICO score possible. Please email me directly with any credit questions, JeanneKelly@kgroupconsulting.com. http://www.thecreditrules.com , www.thecreditrules.com And remember to make a fresh start this New Year by adding at least one more resolution to your list: Get Focused on My Credit!

Read the full article →

2010 may look much like 2009 in commercial real estate (Fort Worth Business Press)

December 28, 2009

Tarrant County’s commercial real estate market has morphed throughout 2009 into a near still sector and according to local commercial real estate experts, 2010 looks hold more of the same with the possibility of some scathing deals.

Read the full article →

Video: FT’s Lex Columnist Johnson on Possible U.K. Bonus Levy: Video

December 7, 2009

Dec. 7 (Bloomberg) — Jo Johnson of the Financial Times’ Lex commentary team talks with Bloomberg’s Erik Schatzker about the possibility that the U.K. government may impose a one-year windfall tax on bankers’ bonuses. (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Video: FT’s Lex Columnist Johnson on Possible U.K. Bonus Levy: Video

December 7, 2009

Dec. 7 (Bloomberg) — Jo Johnson of the Financial Times’ Lex commentary team talks with Bloomberg’s Erik Schatzker about the possibility that the U.K. government may impose a one-year windfall tax on bankers’ bonuses. (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Video: FT’s Lex Columnist Johnson on Possible U.K. Bonus Levy: Video

December 7, 2009

Dec. 7 (Bloomberg) — Jo Johnson of the Financial Times’ Lex commentary team talks with Bloomberg’s Erik Schatzker about the possibility that the U.K. government may impose a one-year windfall tax on bankers’ bonuses. (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Zhu Zhu Pets Recall? ‘Toxic’ Robot Toys Are Unsafe, Group Claims

December 6, 2009

ST. LOUIS — A consumer group contends one of the holiday season’s must-have toys is unsafe. But the maker of the robotic Zhu Zhu Pets hamsters defended its product Saturday against a study by San Francisco-based GoodGuide that said higher-than-allowed levels of the chemical antimony were found in the toy. Good Guide named Zhu Zhu Pets hamsters one of the top-selling toys with low ratings after finding antimony, which can cause health problems, on the hair and nose of one of the toy hamsters, called Mr. Squiggles. The group assigned the toy, aimed at 3- to 10-year-olds, a rating of 5.2 on a 10-point scale. But the toy’s maker, St. Louis-based Cepia LLC, insisted in a statement that its product is safe and has passed rigorous testing. The company said it was contacting GoodGuide to share its testing data and determine how the report was founded. “I have been in the toy industry for more than 35 years, and being a father of children myself, I would never allow any substandard or unsafe product to hit the shelves,” Russ Hornsby, Cepia’s CEO, said in the statement. Zhu Zhu Pets, which retail for about $10, have become this season’s toy craze, following in the footsteps of Tickle Me Elmo and Cabbage Patch Kids. The items fetch $40 or more on resale Web sites like eBay and Craigslist. That’s what brought it to GoodGuide’s attention. GoodGuide CEO Dara O’Rourke told The Associated Press on Saturday that his group bought three of each of the year’s 30 hottest toys and tested them multiple times. Antimony was measured at 93 parts per million in the hamster’s fur and at 106 parts per million in its nose. Both readings exceed the allowable level of 60 parts per million, said O’Rourke, an associate professor of environmental science at the University of California, Berkeley. O’Rourke said GoodGuide’s test results, released Friday, also indicated the possibility that some toys contained phthalates, chemicals that were subject to tougher standards in the Consumer Protection Safety Improvement Act passed last year.

Read the full article →