presidents

Huffington Post…

When University of Michigan President Mary Sue Coleman made a Christmas wish, she didn’t write a letter to Santa; she addressed one to President Obama instead. In Ian open letter , Coleman commended Obama for calling attention to the “thorny issue” of higher education affordability, but wrote that as a country the United States “absolutely must find ways to provide a college education at a cost that is sustainable.” But while Coleman is pressing for reforms on the national stage, some students say she isn’t doing enough at her own university. Coleman’s letter made four recommendations for reducing costs at colleges and universities across the country based on her experience at U-M: States should reinvest in public higher education; business leaders should advocate for funding; private donations should be considered a necessary support; and universities should continue to cut costs across the board — except for financial aid. Coleman called Michigan’s public four-year institutions “ground zero for funding cuts,” noting they took a 15 percent cut in the last year and 30 percent over the last decade. U-M has cut $235 million in operational costs in the last eight years. A group of students brought their own concerns about U-M’s affordability not to President Obama, but to Coleman and U-M’s board. On Thursday, the day before Coleman’s letter was posted, Occupy U-M protesters spoke out at a Board of Regents meeting against the school’s tuition increases. Approximately 20 people took over the meeting and left shortly after reading a speech. Protesters said the school is run like a business that sells education to those who can afford it, the Free Press reports . Occupy U-M pointed out that tuition has increased 233 percent since 1990, to about $12,000 a year for in-state undergraduates, and asked regents to be more accountable to the public, the Detroit News reports . A recent report from the College Board showed that college costs rose much more quickly than cost-of-living inflation for the 2011-2012 school year. As has been the case for several years, public school costs are increasing more rapidly than those of private four-year schools. The difficulties of student loan debt and the cost of higher education are two of the issues that the Occupy movement has continually protested. Last month, the national Occupy Student Debt campaign intitated a million-person pledge drive for student borrowers to default on their loans . Obama recently held a conference with university presidents about college affordability, but Coleman, who is also chairwoman of the Association of American Universities, did not attend due to a scheduling conflict, according to the Free Press . Coleman’s entire letter, first posted on the University of Michigan website , appears below. “Dear Mr. President, Your recent meeting with college presidents is the best Christmas present I could have hoped for. By bringing together higher education leaders to discuss college affordability, you have elevated a thorny issue that demands a national conversation because of its impact on all sectors of society. The cost of attending college is one of the most serious matters facing a country that seeks to strengthen its global competitiveness. How we resolve this dilemma requires collaboration, sacrifice and hard choices. American higher education – particularly public higher education – is one of the monumental achievements of our country. No other nation can rival the innovation, creativity and intellectual fervor of our universities. Our institutions are responsible for America’s knowledge security – an intellectual wellbeing that advances health and medicine, business, social science, the arts, public policy and national defense. And yet college is costly – too costly for some families. To meet the myriad needs of students and society, we absolutely must find ways to provide a college education at a cost that is sustainable. President Thomas Jefferson was rightfully adamant that a cornerstone of democracy is education for all, “from the richest to the poorest.” Higher education is a public good currently lacking public support. There is no stronger trigger for rising costs at public universities and colleges than declining state support. The University of Michigan and our state’s 14 other public institutions have been ground zero for funding cuts. The state’s significant disinvestment in higher education has been challenging: a 15 percent cut in the last year alone, and a reduction of more than 30 percent over the last decade. We have worked extremely hard to mitigate the impact of these cuts on students and families. We must and will do more, but also offer recommendations that may benefit all of higher education. First and foremost, it is essential that states reinvest in their public colleges and universities. Not doing so is shortsighted and threatens to cripple remarkable institutions of learning. The University of California system is admired worldwide, yet its rapid dismantling because of underfunding is distressing; this is just the most dramatic example of starved higher education budgets nationwide. Second, American business, to remain globally competitive, has a vested interest in the talent and research embodied in higher education. As employers of our graduates, business leaders must advocate for strong, consistent funding of higher education. The Business Leaders of Michigan, for example, is a private organization partnering with our state’s three research universities to help reignite the Michigan economy. These executives advocate increasing our state investment in higher education from its current status of 38th in the nation to the top 10. This collective voice of support is encouraging and powerful. Third, private support no longer is a luxury, but rather a necessity. Philanthropy has always been a cornerstone of America’s private universities; the culture of giving back to one’s alma mater is ingrained in students from their first days on campus. Public universities must look more to alumni and friends for support, particularly for scholarships. As president, I challenged Michigan alumni to fund need-based scholarships for undergraduates, and they responded with nearly $70 million; this came after raising $540 million in a capital campaign to support students. Universities have an obligation to ask, and alumni should feel equally obligated to give back. Finally, universities themselves must continue to cut costs. It may not always feel so for families, but at Michigan we have cut $235 million in operational costs in the last eight years to help offset tuition increases. We have eliminated or consolidated hundreds of jobs. We have asked employees to pay more for their health care. Only one budget item is sacrosanct and that is financial aid; here we are adding dollars. The result is that for many of our low- to middle-income resident students, it actually costs less to attend Michigan today than in 2004, and their loan burdens are lower than in previous years. Mr. President, you have two wonderful daughters; I have two beautiful grandchildren. Parents and grandparents throughout the country want a secure, productive future for our young, and that future will demand a college education. As a former college professor, you know the rewards of seeing students grow intellectually, exercise critical thinking, and begin to shape their communities. This transformative experience of higher learning contributes to the overall wellbeing of our nation. The onus is now on all of us – elected officials, university presidents, business leaders, philanthropists and parents – to collaborate on effective answers. I welcome being part of this critical national conversation and I trust that together America can find solutions. You have my best wishes for a warm holiday season. Respectfully yours, Mary Sue Coleman”

View original post here:
Occupy U-M Protesters Tell Mary Sue Coleman To Put Her Money Where Her Mouth Is

Find our Weekly Commercial Real Estate, Private Equity and Fund Newsletters at www.WeeklyBrief.net

Huffington Post…

Hauling several bags of garbage left at a foreclosed Bank of America property in Malden, dozens of protesters showed up at bank president Robert Gallery’s Beacon Hill home Wednesday to dump the trash and unload fury.

Read more from the original source:
Protestors Dump Trash At Bank President’s Home Over Layoffs, Foreclosures

Find our Weekly Commercial Real Estate, Private Equity and Fund Newsletters at www.WeeklyBrief.net

Can Obama Extend The Debt Ceiling On His Own?

July 29, 2011

As the debt ceiling fiasco continues unresolved and increasingly dangerous, with no agreement among the House, the Senate and the White House yet in sight, an obscure and forgotten constitutional clause has suddenly come under scrutiny.

Read the full article →

Elizabeth Warren’s Farewell Note: ‘I Leave This Agency, But Not This Fight’

July 29, 2011

WASHINGTON — Elizabeth Warren, rebuffed by the White House, today leaves the consumer agency she conceived of and created to return to academic life at Harvard Law School. Her unit, the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection, is charged with protecting borrowers from abusive lenders. Created in the wake of the most punishing financial crisis since the Great Depression, which Warren has said began “one bad mortgage at a time,” the agency is one of President Barack Obama’s most notable accomplishments in attempting to reform the nation’s financial system. But after hostile sniping from Congressional Republicans, and some Democrats, the White House was able to duck questions about its commitment to Warren and her desire to lead the agency, and instead nominated one of her deputies, former Ohio Attorney General Richard Cordray, to be the unit’s inaugural chief. Experts largely agreed Warren was the best candidate for the job. Community bankers, though initially fearful of increased oversight, grew to accept her. Unions and community groups enthusiastically supported Warren, and repeatedly urged the White House to nominate the noted consumer advocate. In the coming days, Warren will leave Washington, take a vacation with her family to the Legoland theme park in California, and return to Cambridge, Mass., where she’ll decide whether to challenge Republican Senator Scott Brown in the 2012 election. Warren sent a farewell note to the nearly 500 staffers she hired and inherited from other federal agencies. “I leave this agency, but not this fight,” Warren wrote. “The issues we deal with — a middle class that has been squeezed and business models built on tricks and traps — are deeply personal to me, and they always will be.” READ Warren’s full note: From: Warren, Elizabeth Sent: Friday, July 29, 2011 1:18 PM To: Subject: A new chapter Team, Four years ago, I submitted an article to Democracy Journal that argued for a new government agency called the Financial Product Safety Commission. I threw myself into that piece because I felt strongly that a new consumer agency would make the credit markets work better for American families and strengthen the economic security of the middle class. In 2007 and 2008, I wrote about the new consumer agency in a number of places, and I talked about the idea with anyone who would listen. And then in 2009, something amazing happened. In June of that year, the President invited a few hundred people to the White House as he unveiled his initial outline for financial reform. It was the first time I had ever been invited to something like this. Just before the President stepped out, aides passed around a summary of the proposed reforms. I grabbed a copy and started tearing through it. As I skimmed over derivatives and capital reserve requirements, I turned a page and saw it—a proposal for a consumer agency. Until that moment, I wasn’t certain whether the new agency would be part of the reform package or not. Under the leadership of Secretary Geithner, Michael Barr, Eric Stein, our own Peggy Twohig, and so many of our other colleagues, the Treasury Department began to refine and improve the initial idea, preparing a proposal to submit to Congress. With strong support from the President, early leadership from Barney Frank and Chris Dodd, and grassroots efforts launched by many consumer groups, the agency began to gather momentum. Despite repeated declarations from the financial services industry and some in Congress that the agency was “dead on arrival” or “going nowhere,” the proposal moved through two nail-biting committee votes, four nail-biting floor votes, and one nail-biting conference committee. It was a hard fight, but the result was a strong and independent new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau with the tools needed to make a real difference for American families. And then something even more amazing started to happen. Good people started turning the idea into a reality. With Wally Adeyemo as Chief of Staff to keep it all organized, we were underway. Smart people with a wide variety of backgrounds—banking, consumer advocacy, government, business, teaching—focused their energy and enthusiasm and creativity on building something new—something that would work for American consumers. All along the way, the pieces came into place. We set critical priorities for the new agency, including streamlining mortgage disclosure and making credit cards easier to understand. We focused our efforts on the challenges facing military families. We organized the most aggressive and effective outreach effort anywhere in government to make sure that our goals were clear and we got as much input as possible from those who will be most affected by the agency’s work. We designed a high-speed, effective HR system, and we figured out how to get in place necessary procurements to support our work. We developed legal concepts to guide our work and procedures to make sure we always honored the law. We created an innovative supervision program. We generated rules of the road to guide our enforcement and fair lending programs. We designed the systems necessary to meet our statutory deadlines and to complete ongoing rule-writing passed from other agencies. We organized an approach for connecting with consumers all across the country through our website, consumer response system, and more. And we did it all in full view, working with Congress and the media every step along the way to make sure the American people are engaged in our work and able to hold us accountable to our mission. That is only a small summary of what we have accomplished together. We did it—and we did it well. And we have some independent verification of that: Two weeks ago, our inspectors general — a tough and independent pair of judges — wrote a glowing report about our stand-up period. Whether you have been here for long months or only a few days, I want to thank you for choosing to be part of this agency. I know that every one of you had other options. I also know that we chose you because we believe you have something special to add. I am grateful that you came here to make a difference. Today is my last day at the Bureau. I leave this agency, but not this fight. The issues we deal with—a middle class that has been squeezed and business models built on tricks and traps—are deeply personal to me, and they always will be. I will cheer as you open a new chapter in our ongoing push for a strong and independent CFPB. You can realize the vision of a 21st century government that holds law-breakers accountable and that enforces basic rules that make markets work honestly. An honest market will give companies that provide fair value to their customers a chance to flourish, free from competition with cheaters. And an honest market will give American families better information, better prices, and better products—and a chance to achieve real economic security. Now it’s up to you -– and I couldn’t be more hopeful about what lies ahead. ew ***** Shahien Nasiripour is a senior business reporter for The Huffington Post. You can send him an email ; bookmark his page ; subscribe to his RSS feed ; follow him on Twitter ; friend him on Facebook ; become a fan ; and/or get e-mail alerts when he reports the latest news. He can be reached at 1-917-267-2335.

Read the full article →

GOP Governor: ‘It Would Be An Embarrassment For U.S. To Default On Its Obligations’

July 17, 2011

By Edith Honan SALT LAKE CITY (Reuters) – State governors meeting in Utah Saturday urged a speedy resolution to the deadlock in Washington over lifting the U.S. debt ceiling to avoid what they called an embarrassing default on U.S. obligations. “This is a dangerous and equally ridiculous situation that’s playing itself out. It takes one sentence to solve this problem — and that’s to lift the debt ceiling,’” Connecticut Governor Dannel Malloy, a Democrat, told Reuters at a National Governors Association meeting in Salt Lake City. Malloy predicted political leaders in Washington would ultimately reach an agreement to avoid a default. State governors are closely watching developments in Washington, where President Barack Obama and his fellow Democrats are in a standoff with congressional Republicans in talks intended to reach a deal to lift the debt ceiling. The governors are concerned over the impact of the debt situation in Washington in part because it could have an impact on their own individual states’ credit ratings. The U.S. Congress must raise the $14.3 trillion limit on U.S. borrowing by Aug. 2 or the federal government will run out of money to pay its bills, causing turmoil in global financial markets and potentially forcing the United States into another recession. Republicans in Washington are demanding deep government spending cuts as part of a deal to raise the debt limit while Obama and the Democrats want tax increases on the wealthy also to be part of the agreement. Republicans oppose tax increases. “I really think we need more statesmen and less politicians in Washington right now because it is a situation that must be solved. And I honestly believe it will be. Everyone’s posturing — both sides,” Alabama Governor Robert Bentley, a Republican, said in an interview. ‘AN EMBARRASSMENT’ Virginia Governor Bob McDonnell, a Republican, added, “It would be an embarrassment for the United States of America to default on its obligations.” “At the same time, there’s got to be a recognition that Congress and the presidents have over-spent and over-promised now for 30 or 40 years. And the bills are due,” McDonnell told Reuters. Rhode Island Governor Lincoln Chafee, a former Republican who is now an independent, said, “We went on a tax-cutting rampage and a spending spree. And the math just does not add up. We’re a crippled economy as a result.” The impasse in Washington, which could lead to missed debt payments, has prompted rating agencies to say the nation’s coveted AAA rating could be in jeopardy. This week, Moody’s placed more than 7,000 ratings affecting about $130 billion in municipal debt on review for a possible downgrade due to a close connection with the U.S. government. “This is big stuff that somebody is playing with, and the fact that it’s become a partisan battle … it’s not what’s good for America,” said North Carolina Governor Bev Perdue, a Democrat. Perdue said on Friday her state finance director was notified by Moody’s that it would review the state’s AAA rating. Perdue expressed confidence North Carolina would hold on to the top rating. A Moody’s spokesman said the rating agency was “looking at the AAA rated states and will announce any rating actions over the next week for states.” (Editing by Will Dunham and Todd Eastham) Copyright 2011 Thomson Reuters. Click for Restrictions .

Read the full article →

Is 56.2 The Magic Number For Fuel Efficiency?

June 27, 2011

WASHINGTON — The Obama administration is telling American automakers that it would like cars and light trucks to average 56.2 miles per gallon by 2025 – a boost to fuel economy that would save consumers money at the pump and help with global warming but drive up the cost of automobiles. Administration officials floated the number at separate meetings last week with the Detroit Three – General Motors, Ford and Chrysler – according to people in government and industry familiar with the discussions. They spoke on condition of anonymity because they weren’t authorized to talk publicly about them. While it is just a starting point, the figure is the first hint of where the government may be headed as it works to set a 2017-2025 fuel economy standard. Last fall, the Transportation Department and the Environmental Protection Agency said they would consider a federal standard somewhere between 47 and 62 mpg. The upper end of the range would mean a massive shift in what Americans drive. A government analysis found about half the lineup of new vehicles would need to be gas-electric hybrids under the most aggressive standards. The technology needed to achieve a 56 mpg standard, according to administration estimates, would add $2,100 to $2,600 to the price of a car. But because the vehicles would need less fuel, owners would make up the difference with fewer trips to the gas station. Environmentalists are pushing for the most stringent standard, but automakers have thus far said they would be willing to work over the next eight years on vehicles that get between 42.6 and 46.7 miles per gallon. The Obama administration is hoping to find some common ground and reach a deal before it makes a formal proposal in September. Early in 2009, the White House announced a landmark agreement with automakers and states requiring cars and light trucks on average to achieve 35.5 miles per gallon by 2016 and set the first-ever standards for greenhouse gas emissions from tailpipes. The stakes are higher this time around, since legislation to curb climate change is no longer being pursued by the White House, which is looking for other ways to address global warming. High gasoline prices have also put pressure on the administration not only to find ways to boost oil supply, but also reduce demand. “We continue to work closely with a broad range of stakeholders to develop an important standard that will save families money and keep the jobs of the future here,” White House spokesman Clark Stevens said in a statement. “A final decision has not been made, and as we have made clear we plan to propose a standard in September.” The goal of 56.2 mpg is tough, but General Motors will figure out a way to reach it, said Mark Reuss, the company’s North American president. He would not say what technologies GM would use to reach the target, but he conceded that many easier, less-costly solutions already are under way or have been done such as switching to smaller engines and developing more fuel-efficient transmissions. “When you put those things in for the first time, they may be more expensive,” he said. “But this is a volume and scale industry. What was very expensive in the past is no longer very expensive.” Ford Motor Co., in a written statement, said discussions with the administration are ongoing, but that it “supports increasing fuel economy requirements with one national program that is data driven and factors in the impact … on jobs, the economy, consumers and safety.” Dan Becker, director of the Safe Climate Campaign at the Center for Auto Safety, cautioned against making too many assumptions, saying that more important than the standard is how automakers will be allowed to achieve it. “It is not just the number that matters. It’s the loopholes underneath it,” Becker said. “And automakers will look to turn whatever number it is into Swiss cheese.” Technology already is available for some cars to reach beyond the 56.2 mpg threshold. The EPA has determined that General Motors’ Chevrolet Volt electric car will get 93 mpg in combined city and highway driving. The Nissan Leaf electric car gets the equivalent of 106 mpg in city driving and 92 mpg on the highway. But electric motors and batteries aren’t quite ready to power larger vehicles such as pickup trucks, creating a challenge for Detroit automakers who get a significant portion of their profits from larger vehicles. ___ Associated Press writer Tom Krisher in Detroit contributed to this report. ___ Follow Dina Cappiello on Twitter at http://twitter.com/dinacappiello

Read the full article →

Poll Shows Key Issue Hurting Obama’s Numbers Ahead Of 2012

June 22, 2011

WASHINGTON — Mired in economic worry, Americans are growing gloomier about where the country is headed and how President Barack Obama is leading it. Opinions of the economy are at the lowest of the year as high gas prices, anemic hiring and financial turmoil abroad shake a nation’s confidence. Obama has hit new highs he’d like to avoid – in public disapproval over his handling of the economy in general and unemployment in particular – according to a new Associated Press-GfK poll. In addition, more disapprove of his handling of health care and the federal budget deficit than in the past. The poll shows that four out of five people now believe the economy is in poor shape. And, separately, Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke said Wednesday that some causes of the slowdown, including a depressed housing market, could persist into next year. Bernanke said the Fed believes growth will pick up going into 2012 but at a slower pace than expected. How slow is a matter of high interest at the White House. A little more than 16 months before the November 2012 election, the public is split on whether the president deserves a second term. For the first time this year in AP-GfK polling, respondents who say Obama deserves re-election have fallen below 50 percent into a virtual split of 48-47 in favor, a demanding challenge for him. Economic concern has quickly stripped away the gloss he briefly gained after the death of Osama bin Laden. Obama’s re-election team is no doubt concerned as well. The president has been traveling every week for months to campaign battleground states to promote job initiatives. He acknowledges the sluggishness of the recovery, illustrated by May’s uptick in unemployment. The price of gasoline at the pump has declined a bit recently though it is still nearly 90 cents higher on average than a year ago. White House officials are also monitoring the precarious fiscal situation in Greece where a default by the government could send damaging financial tremors across world markets. Obama’s overall approval rating fell to 52 percent in the new poll, in line with his ratings before the daring raid in Pakistan by U.S. commandos last month that killed bin Laden. The erosion of approval is primarily among women. Last month, 57 percent said they felt he deserved re-election, a figure that dipped to 48 percent this month. The decline came almost entirely among white women, just 37 percent of whom say Obama deserves re-election in the new poll. “I just think that he’s not doing his job the way he should be,” said Mary Perrine, a grandmother of three from West Lafayette, Ind., who said she has had to struggle to pay her bills. Obama faced 59 percent disapproval on his handling of the economy and on unemployment. The steepest decrease was among respondents with incomes above $50,000. In May, 53 percent approved of his efforts to fight unemployment; in June 36 percent approved. Still, the poll also showed the public to be conflicted about the president. And their perceptions about the national economy were often at odds with their own personal experiences. More people – 56 percent of respondents – had a favorable impression of Obama himself than approved of his performance. Moreover, about three-quarters of the survey participants said it is unrealistic to expect noticeable results on the economy in one term. And despite the overwhelming sentiment that the national economy is in poor shape, more than three of five of those polled rated the financial situation of their own households as good. While glum about the current state of the economy, one-third said they expect it to get better over the next year. Less than a third said it would get worse, and the remainder said it would remain the same. In another consolation for the president, he rates far better than Congress with the public. Congressional job disapproval climbed to 76 percent in the poll, a new high. “I kind of sit of on the fence about it,” Paul Fenger, a Cottonwood, Minn., farmer said about Obama’s job performance. “I think he is trying to do a good job, but the information isn’t getting out and Congress_ the Republicans and Democrats_ aren’t working together.” Obama may have to count on the likes of John Holdnak, a Florida Department of Education administrator, who didn’t vote for him in 2008 buts believes “he has really stepped up to do this job.” Does Obama deserve re-election? “I don’t know yet. A lot of things can happen now and between the election that could be his fault. At this particular juncture, he hasn’t done anything in my mind not to be re-elected,” said Holdnak, one of the survey participants. The poll was conducted June 16-20 by GfK Roper Public Affairs and Corporate Communications. It involved landline and cellphone interviews with 1,001 adults nationwide and had a margin of sampling error of plus or minus 4.1 percentage points. ___ Associated Press Polling Director Trevor Tompson, Deputy Polling Director Jennifer Agiesta and AP News Survey Specialist Dennis Junius contributed to this report. Online: http://www.ap-gfkpoll.com

Read the full article →

Morrison Commercial Real Estate Completes Two Lease Transactions Totaling 31,068 SF in Southwest Orlando

May 25, 2011

  ORLANDO, FL (May 25, 2011):   Greg Morrison, CCIM, SIOR, Principal of Morrison Commercial Real Estate, announced the completion of two large lease transactions totaling 31,068 ± square feet.   Lisa Bailey (top right photo) and Phil Marchese (lower left photo) of Morrison Commercial Real Estate represented the NWP Group, LLC in leasing 20,700± square feet at 7570 Exchange Drive.   Tom McFadden of Southern Commercial Real Estate Advisors represented the Landlord in this transaction.   NWP Group is a residential plumbing company that has been in business for over 52 years serving locations throughout the Southeast.   Bailey and Marchese represented the Landlord in renewing the lease for Walgreens at Presidents Plaza for a total of 10,368± square feet .   Dan Walsh and Jeff Linklater of NAI Capital represented the Tenant in this transaction. Contac t: Buffy Gillette, Phone: 407.219.3500 Email:   bgillette@morrisoncre.com

Read the full article →

Camelot Entertainment and Distribution Announce New Management Promotions

May 10, 2011

Camelot Names New President of CEG and New Presidents of CDG

Read the full article →

Magnum Hunter Resources Realigns Senior Management Team and Appoints Three Divisional Presidents

May 4, 2011

HOUSTON, TX–(Marketwire – May 4, 2011) – Magnum Hunter Resources Corporation ( NYSE : MHR ) ( NYSE Amex : MHR-PrC ) ( NYSE Amex : MHR-PrD ) (“Magnum Hunter” or the “Company”) announced this morning the appointment of Presidents for each of the Company’s three primary areas of geographic operations: (i) the Williston Basin, (ii) the Appalachian Basin, and (iii) the Eagle Ford Shale of Central and South Texas. The appointment of these three new Divisional Presidents follows the tremendous growth Magnum Hunter has experienced with the recent closings of both the NGAS Resources acquisition on April 13, 2011 and the NuLoch Resources acquisition on May 3, 2011 which total in excess of $425 Million.

Read the full article →

Rajeev Sharma: America’s Relationship with India: A Source of Security in Times of Turmoil

April 1, 2011

Imagine a country that declares its independence from Great Britain, forges democracy from diversity, enjoys robust economic growth, and emerges as a world power. You’ve just described the United States — and modern India . In the midst of near-double-digit unemployment, many Americans are anxious about any nation that competes for high-skill jobs. But, when it comes to creating jobs, resisting terrorism, and advancing human rights, US — India relations should be regarded as an asset, expectant with opportunity, not a source of anxiety. Now is the time to broaden and deepen this mutually beneficial relationship. Commerce Secretary Gary Locke’s recent trade mission to India highlighted the economic advantages of an alliance between the world’s two largest democracies. Secretary Locke was accompanied by executives from 24 American businesses including small and medium sized enterprises. Building on President Obama’s very successful delegation to India in November, these visits are reaping rewards for American businesses and workers. Having accompanied both President Obama and Secretary Locke on each of their missions, I have personally witnessed their benefit in the increased awareness of and accessibility to US businesses in India. Most importantly, I have witnessed the impact of these trips on my fellow delegates, many of whom were visiting India for the first time, and the realization of their potential in the burgeoning Indian market. During the President’s journey, US companies completed more than $10 billion in business deals, supporting more than 50,000 American jobs at major employers. Following up on these gains, Secretary Locke’s trade mission tackled tough issues, such as tearing down trade barriers in the advanced industrial sector. As these tariffs are reduced or removed, US companies are able to expand their exports to India — and create good jobs here at home — in cutting-edge industries: civil aviation, renewable energy, communications, information technology and defense and security. These trade missions are bearing fruit because India’s fast-growing market is increasingly receptive to American exports. For its first four decades after independence, India’s economy was state-controlled and stagnant and it was considered a more challenging market to enter than China. But, following free-market reforms, including reductions in tariffs and taxes, India’s economy took off at an ever-accelerating rate, most recently growing by 5.5 percent in 2009 and an estimated 9.7 percent in 2010. India now plans for nearly a trillion dollars worth of infrastructure upgrades to its roads, bridges, harbors, water treatment and power plants, opening up opportunities on an unprecedented scale. As I write this, our company’s next generation, plasma gasification waste-to-energy solutions are being commercialized in India, both in thriving metropolitan centers and small villages without access to electricity. We are responding to a sharp growth in demand for power in India and a call by the Indian Government for 14,500 MW of added capacity from renewable sources by 2012. Competing and winning in a free market with US developed Intellectual Property, we are directly benefiting from the closer bilateral relations between the two countries. And our experience is not unique. American exports are growing in tandem with India’s economy, increasing by nearly 170 percent from 2005 through 2009 and amounting to nearly $50 billion in 2010. These exports are in sectors that help build America’s future with well-paying jobs — machinery ($2.3 billion in 2009), aircraft and parts ($2.3 billion), electric machinery ($1.3 billion), and fertilizers ($1.1 billion). Communities in this country with the largest exports to India include California ($2.2 billion) Washington ($1.8 billion), New York ($1.5 billion) and Florida ($1 billion). As exports continue to grow, those benefits will expand both within these communities and to other regions throughout the country. With India’s middle class expected to expand tenfold from 50 million to 500 million over the next 15 years, the potential market for American goods and services is extraordinary — and exponentially increasing. This is especially important because in a Global Attitudes Survey, over 76 percent of Indians responded with a favorable view of the US. This goodwill is an amazing foundation that extends to American products and American culture. But we face unrelenting competition from China, Russia, France, Britain and other rivals who aggressively want to establish dominance in this growing market, too. The prize: hundreds of thousands of high-wage, export-based jobs Our focus must be to innovate, compete and expand into this vast emerging market. Jobs created from an innovation economy provide stability and growth to the US and allay past concerns about issues such as outsourcing. And when domestic industries expand in India, we should recognize opportunity in their success, not view them as an opportunity lost. For example, India’s vaunted software and services industry accounts for about $60 billion in aggregated revenue, and spending in these sectors is forecast to grow over 17 percent per year between 2010 and 2014. In the midst of one of the most competitive markets for software services, our company is gaining traction with its open source, real time situational awareness and Cyber security software solutions both in commercial and government markets. Innovation and pioneering technology are key differentiators in all markets, even those as competitive as India. Innovation is what has distinguished American IP in the past and has to be the foundation for our growth in the future. In addition to the economic benefits, the American relationship with India is principally based on common interests and common values of free markets and trade. Unbeknownst to many, America is reaping the benefits of the newer phenomenon of growing Indian investments in the US. As Ernst and Young recently reported, Indian companies have increased their investments in the US by more than $20 billion over the past five years, supporting more than 65,000 jobs here in the US. That’s not outsourcing that costs American jobs — that’s in-sourcing that creates American jobs. Under Presidents Bush and Obama, our two nations have strengthened our strategic partnership and increasingly aligned our strategic interests; India, for example, is now the sixth largest bilateral aid donor to Afghanistan. Soon celebrating its 65th anniversary, India’s democracy includes free elections, competing parties, lively media, and an independent judiciary. Meanwhile, more than 3 million Indian Americans, including two Governors, contribute to our own country, participating in our democracy and enlivening our economy. At an event at our home last fall, President Obama eloquently discussed the indispensable nature of the US-India relationship in the 21st Century. The President postulated that the US relationship with India is an asset to be developed for the sake of American jobs and American businesses, American interests and American ideals. Americans from all walks of life can and should embrace India not only as a key partner in this recovery, but also as America’s next great ally. Rajeev Sharma is Chief Executive Officer of ABSi, a technology services and solutions company headquartered in Rockville, Md. ABSi also has offices in New Delhi, India.

Read the full article →

U.S.’s Growing Nuclear Waste Problem

March 23, 2011

— The nuclear crisis in Japan has laid bare an ever-growing problem for the United States – the enormous amounts of still-hot radioactive waste accumulating at commercial nuclear reactors in more than 30 states. The U.S. has 71,862 tons of the waste, according to state-by-state numbers obtained by The Associated Press. But the nation has no place to permanently store the material, which stays dangerous for tens of thousands of years. Plans to store nuclear waste at Nevada’s Yucca Mountain have been abandoned, but even if a facility had been built there, America already has more waste than it could have handled. Three-quarters of the waste sits in water-filled cooling pools like those at the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear complex in Japan, outside the thick concrete-and-steel barriers meant to guard against a radioactive release from a nuclear reactor. Spent fuel at Dai-ichi overheated, possibly melting fuel-rod casings and spewing radiation into the air, after Japan’s tsunami knocked out power to cooling systems at the plant. The rest of the spent fuel from commercial U.S. reactors has been put into dry cask storage, but regulators only envision those as a solution for about a century and the waste would eventually have to be deposited into a Yucca-like facility. The U.S. nuclear industry says the waste is being stored safely at power-plant sites, though it has long pushed for a long-term storage facility. Meanwhile, the industry’s collective pile of waste is growing by about 2,200 tons a year; experts say some of the pools in the United States contain four times the amount of spent fuel that they were designed to handle. The AP analyzed a state-by-state summary of spent fuel data based on information that nuclear power plants voluntarily report every year to the Nuclear Energy Institute, an industry and lobbying group. The NEI would not make available the amount of spent fuel at individual power plants. While the U.S. Department of Energy previously reported figures on overall spent fuel storage, it no longer has updated information available. A spokesman for the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, which oversees nuclear power plant safety, said the capacities of fuel pools are public record, but exact inventories of spent fuel are tracked in a government database kept confidential for security reasons. The U.S. has 104 operating nuclear reactors, situated on 65 sites in 31 states. There are another 15 permanently shut reactors that also house spent fuel. Four states have spent fuel even though they don’t have operating commercial plants. Reactors in Colorado, Oregon and Maine are permanently shut; spent fuel from all three is stored in dry casks. Idaho never had a commercial reactor, but waste from the 1979 Three Mile Island accident in Pennsylvania is being stored at a federal facility there. Illinois has 9,301 tons of spent nuclear fuel at its power plants, the most of any state in the country, according to industry figures. It is followed by Pennsylvania with 6,446 tons; 4,290 in South Carolina and roughly 3,780 tons each for New York and North Carolina. Spent nuclear fuel is about 95 percent uranium. About 1 percent are other heavy elements such as curium, americium and plutonium-239, best known as fuel for nuclear weapons. Each has an extremely long half-life – some take hundreds of thousands of years to lose all of their radioactive potency. The rest, about 4 percent, is a cocktail of byproducts of fission that break down over much shorter time periods, such as cesium-137 and strontium-90, which break down completely in about 300 years. How dangerous these elements are depends on how easily can find their way into the body. Plutonium and uranium are heavy, and don’t spread through the air well, but there is a concern that plutonium could leach into water supplies over thousands of years. Cesium-137 is easily transported by air. It is cesium-137 that can still be detected in a New Jersey-sized patch of land around the Chernobyl reactor that exploded in the Ukraine in 1986. Typically, waste must sit in pools at least five years before being moved to a cask or permanent storage, but much of the material in the pools of U.S. plants has been stored there far longer than that. Safety advocates have long urged the NRC to force utility operators to reduce the amount of spent fuel in their pools. The more tightly packed they are, the more quickly they can overheat and spew radiation into the environment in case of an accident, a natural disaster or a terrorist attack. Industry leaders say new technology has made fuel pools safer, and regulators have taken some steps since the 9/11 terror attacks to reduce fuel pool risks. Kevin Crowley, who directs the nuclear and radiation studies board at the National Academy of Sciences, says lessons will be learned from the crisis in Japan. And NRC Chairman Gregory Jaczko says his agency will review how spent fuel is stored in the U.S. A 2004 report by the academy suggested that fresh spent fuel, which is radioactively hotter, be spread among older, cooler assemblies in the spent fuel pool. “You’re buying yourself time, basically,” says Crowley. “The cooler ones can act as a thermal buffer.” First Energy, which runs two nuclear power stations in Ohio and one in Pennsylvania, was able to reconfigure the spent fuel rods in its pools to make more room. Still, the company is now running out of space, says spokesman Todd Schneider. Ohio has 1,136 tons of spent fuel in pools and 37 tons in dry casks. The casks in the U.S. are kept outdoors, generally on concrete pads, but industry officials insist they are safe. Unlike the pools, the casks don’t need electricity; they are cooled by air circulation. One cask model, selling for $1.5 million, places spent fuel inside a stainless steel canister, which is placed inside an “overpack” – an outside shell composed of a layer of carbon steel, 27 inches of concrete and another layer of carbon steel. When in place, the system stands 20 feet tall and weighs 150,000 pounds, said Joy Russell, a spokeswoman for manufacturer Holtec International of Florida. Russell said engineers have designed the system to withstand a crash from an F-16 fighter jet and survive the resulting jet fuel fire. Plant operators in some states have moved aggressively to dry cask storage. Virginia has 1,533 tons of nuclear waste in dry storage and 1,105 tons in spent fuel pools. Maryland has 844 tons in dry storage and 588 tons in spent fuel pools. Utilities in Texas, though, have not. There are 2,178 tons kept in spent fuel pools at reactor sites there, and zero in dry casks. In New York, 3,345 tons are in spent fuel pools while only 454 tons are in dry storage. No cask is totally invulnerable, but the academy report found that radioactive releases from casks would be relatively low. “If you attacked a fuel cask and managed to put a hole in it, anything that came out, the consequences would be very local,” Crowley said. Casks can be licensed for 20 years, with renewals, said Carrie Phillips, a spokeswoman for the Atlanta-based Southern Co., which has a dozen such casks at its two-reactor Joseph M. Farley plant near Columbia, Ala. She said officials have “every expectation” the casks could last “in excess of 100 years by design.” But not the needed tens of thousands of years. For long-term storage, the government had looked to Yucca Mountain. It was designed to hold 77,160 tons – 69,444 tons designated for commercial waste and 7,716 for military waste. That means the current inventory already exceeds Yucca’s original planned capacity. A 1982 law gave the federal government responsibility for the long-term storage of nuclear waste and promised to start accepting waste in 1998. After 20 years of study, Congress passed a law in 2002 to build a nuclear waste repository deep in Yucca Mountain. The federal government spent $9 billion developing the project, but the Obama administration has cut funding and recalled the license application to build it. Nevadans have fiercely opposed Yucca Mountain, though a collection of state governments and others are taking legal action to reverse the decision. Despite his Yucca Mountain decision, President Barack Obama wants to expand nuclear power. He created a commission last year to come up with a long-term nuclear waste plan. Initial findings are expected this summer, with a final plan expected in January. “They are 13 years late,” says Terry Pickens, Director of Nuclear Policy at Xcel Energy, the Minneapolis-based utility that operates three reactors in Minnesota. Xcel is building steel-and-concrete cask containers to hold old waste on site, and suing the government periodically to pay for them. “We would like them to get done with what they said they would get done.” Some countries – such as France, Japan, Russia and the United Kingdom – reprocess their spent fuel into new nuclear fuel to help reduce the amount of waste. The remaining waste is solidified into a glass. It needs to be stored in a long-term waste repository, but reprocessing reduces the volume of waste by three-quarters. Because reprocessing isolates plutonium, which can be used to make a nuclear weapon, Presidents Gerald Ford and Jimmy Carter put a stop to it in the U.S. The ban was later overturned, but the country still does not reprocess. France produces 1,300 tons of nuclear waste per year, and reprocesses 940 tons. Still, fuel is only reprocessed once and then it, too, needs to be stored. France is expecting that engineers will eventually succeed in building a new type of nuclear reactor called a fast reactor that will use the waste it can’t reprocess as fuel. “They’ve kicked the can down the road,” says Frank von Hippel, a director of the Program on Science and Global Security at Princeton University. Other countries, such as Germany, store spent fuel in casks. Finland is building a repository it says will store waste safely for 100,000 years. Even though there is no long-term storage in the U.S., utility customers and taxpayers have been paying for it – twice. Customers have paid $24 billion into a fund Congress established in 1982 to pay for such storage. The charge – a penny for every 10 kilowatt-hours – would typically add up to about $11 a year for a household that received all its electricity from nuclear plants. Users pay as taxpayers, too – for dry storage. Utilities that have run out of storage space in pools successfully sued the federal government for breach of contract, because it failed to keep to the 1998 deadline to establish long-term storage. By law, the money for dry casks cannot come from the nuclear waste fund, and must come from the federal budget.

Read the full article →

Status Of Banks, Post Offices & Mail On Presidents Day 2011

February 20, 2011

If you’re seeking to do business with your bank on Monday, Feb. 21, 2011, chances are it will be closed due to Presidents Day. Most banks are not open on Presidents Day 2011, just like last year and previous years, as it’s a federal holiday (also known as Washington’s Birthday). The next business day for closed banks will be Tuesday, Feb. 22. However, a select few banks will be open including Wachovia Bank and State Employees’ Credit Union, per ENCToday . Also, if you bank with a small local or community bank, it’s best to check with them to be sure. In addition to most banks being closed, post offices will also be closed as Presidents Day 2011 is a USPS holiday . Mail will not be delivered Monday. Federal government agencies also observe the holiday.

Read the full article →

Rep. Mike Honda: Cents and Sensibility: The Economic Case Behind Immigration Reform

February 7, 2011

House Speaker John Boehner’s recent selection of Rep. Elton Gallegly of California over Rep. Steve King of Iowa to head the Judiciary Committee’s immigration subcommittee is one step closer to the kind of reform for which past administrations, including those of former Presidents George W. Bush, Bill Clinton and Ronald Reagan, had long called. Both Republican congressmen may be opposed to the kind of reform that House Democrats call for. But Gallegly seems inclined to take a more reasoned approach. Especially if Democrats can explain the economic advantages to reform. And there are many. Immigration brings formidable fiscal implications. Keeping immigrants here or sending them home can save or cost taxpayers dearly. Just count the ways that reform, which puts undocumented immigrants on the path to legalization, could foot our country’s finances. First, any deportation plan for undocumented immigrants would cost our country’s gross domestic product a whopping $2.6 trillion over the next 10 years, according to a study by Raul Hinojosa-Ojeda, a professor at the University of California, Los Angeles. Conversely, if we embrace comprehensive immigration reform, we could add $1.5 trillion to the U.S. GDP over the next 10 years. The economy could also benefit from a temporary worker program, Hinojosa-Ojeda projected,by raising GDP by $792 billion. Second, immigrants who become U.S. citizens consistently pursue higher-paying jobs and higher education, spend more and provide higher tax revenue. Just imagine what 12 million newly documented Americans could do for the economy. The legalization process also brings economic benefits — like the retention of remittances. Workers send substantial portions of their salary to family members abroad, but reform could reunite families separated by our immigration system and keep monies in the U.S. For example, total U.S. remittances to Latin America was almost $46 billion in 2008. Of that, Mexico received almost $24 billion. Reducing remittances offers obvious cash infusion for our economy, since billions of dollars now sent overseas would be spent instead on U.S. businesses — creating jobs and helping to revive our economy. Third, by giving 2.1 million American students the opportunity to pursue higher education or military service, our government could collect $3.6 trillion over the next 40 years. The DREAM Act, which failed in the Senate in December but remains a bipartisan effort, offers a conditional six-year path to permanent, legal U.S. residence for immigrant youth who demonstrate good moral character and complete at least two years of higher education or U.S. military service. Without the DREAM Act, about 65,000 students a year — honor-roll scholars, star athletes, talented artists and aspiring teachers — will graduate high school and then hit a roadblock. Instead of upward mobility and higher education, they will be forced to live in the shadows and work low-paying jobs. Fourth, the Reuniting Families Act, which I plan to reintroduce this Congress, would allow all Americans to be reunited with their families — including gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender “permanent partners.” The economic benefits of this policy cannot be overstated. American workers, with their families by their side, are happier, healthier and more able to succeed than those living apart from loved ones for years on end. By pooling resources, families can do together what they can’t do alone — start small businesses, provide care for the young and old, create U.S. jobs and contribute more to this country’s welfare. Healthier communities have more expendable income and place a lower burden on government social services. This correlation is well substantiated — but it is up to us to make it a reality. We understand that during tough economic times, the natural reaction is to close borders and look inward. Yet the irony of an anti-immigration sentiment, which fears job losses for Americans if more workers enter the U.S., is that it is fiscally prudent to legalize, insure, employ, reunite and educate our immigrants than to keep families apart. This is a time when we must use every available resource to stimulate our economy and control government spending. To my fiscally conservative Republican colleagues, the onus is on you. Left to future Congresses, the number of undocumented immigrants will only increase and the visa waits will only get longer. Meanwhile, we will lose an opportunity to do what’s economically right. The fiscal case is clear: reform now. California Rep. Mike Honda serves on the Appropriations and the Budget Committees and is the Democratic senior whip. Follow Rep Honda on Facebook and Twitter .

Read the full article →

Brown & Brown, Inc. Names Four Regional Vice Presidents

February 7, 2011

DAYTONA BEACH, FL and TAMPA, FL–(Marketwire – February 7, 2011) – The Board of Directors of Brown & Brown, Inc. ( NYSE : BRO ) today announced that Eric E. Anderson, Anthony M. (“Tony”) Grippa, Thomas Keith (“Tommy”) Huval, and Richard A. (“Rich”) Knudson, Jr. have been elected Regional Vice Presidents of the Company. All of these individuals have served as Profit Center Leaders, and all will assume responsibility for the oversight of additional operations in the Company’s Retail Division.

Read the full article →

U.S. Fails To Finalize Stalled Trade Deal With South Korea

November 12, 2010

SEOUL, South Korea — South Korea and the United States failed to score a breakthrough on a long-stalled free trade agreement and will keep negotiating, their presidents said Thursday, in a sharp setback to hopes of speedily ratifying the ambitious accord. The two sides have been holding negotiations this week to jump-start the deal to slash tariffs and other barriers to trade that was signed in 2007 when previous administrations were in power. It remains unratified by lawmakers in both countries. Progress has been slowed by U.S. demands that South Korea reduce its surplus in auto trade and further open its market for American beef. The global financial crisis in 2008 and recession that followed also sapped momentum. “We share the view that we need more time,” South Korean President Lee Myung-bak said at a joint press conference with President Barack Obama. Obama had hoped to announce a deal on the pact while in South Korea for a summit of the Group of 20 economic powers, but instead he will return home empty-handed. “We have asked our teams to work tirelessly in the coming days and weeks to get this completed,” Obama said. “We don’t want months to pass before we get this done,” he said. “We want this to be done in a matter of weeks.” The leaders did not say what issues prevented an agreement, but South Korean news reports said earlier this week that the U.S. was pressing Seoul to loosen auto fuel and emissions standards to help boost U.S. sales of cars to South Korea. Kim Dong-cheol, a lawmaker with South Korea’s opposition Democratic Party and a member of the parliamentary foreign affairs and trade committee, told The Associated Press before the presidents spoke that he received a call from Trade Minister Kim Jong-hoon on Thursday that indicated the talks might be unsuccessful. Trade Minister Kim reported to President Lee Myung-bak that “it would be difficult to reach a deal on the FTA before the G-20 due to unreasonable U.S demands,” according to the lawmaker. Lee told his trade minister that “if so, it would be better to discuss it later,” according to Kim Dong-cheol, the lawmaker, who did not provide further details. The White House says the deal could add at least $10 billion to U.S. gross domestic product and boost exports to South Korea by $10 billion to $11 billion a year. It would be the largest U.S. trade deal since a 1994 agreement with Canada and Mexico. Bilateral trade between South Korea and the U.S. totaled $66.7 billion in 2009, down sharply from $84.7 billion in 2008 as global commerce suffered during the economic downturn. American businesses have warned that the U.S. risks losing out to rivals, including the European Union, which signed a free trade agreement with South Korea last month. Seoul and Brussels are aiming to have it take effect in July of next year, pending ratification. “Time is of the essence,” Thomas Donohue, president of the Washington-based U.S. Chamber of Commerce – the biggest U.S. business lobby – said in a statement Thursday expressing disappointment that an agreement was not reached. “American jobs are on the line.” South Korea, which has been aggressive in pursuing free trade deals, has pacts in effect with India, the 10-member Association of Southeast Asian Nations and other countries. It is also negotiating other agreements. Cars have been a particular concern of the United States in trade relations with South Korea, home to Hyundai Motor Co. and Kia Motors Corp., which together form the world’s fifth-biggest automotive group. Figures compiled by auto industry groups in South Korea show that it exported 449,403 vehicles to the U.S. last year, while South Koreans purchased 6,140 vehicles made by American manufacturers, based on vehicle registrations. U.S. automakers Ford Motor Co. and Chrysler Group LLC have criticized the trade imbalance, arguing that the Korean market has been closed off to American-made cars by arbitrary regulations. General Motors, which owns a majority stake in Korean automaker Daewoo, has remained neutral in the talks. The South Korean figures do not include the 200,371 vehicles sold in the U.S. last year by Hyundai that were made at its American plant nor the 114,845 sold in South Korea by GM Daewoo Auto & Technology Co., the South Korean unit of General Motors Co. Hyundai builds its popular Sonata midsize car, its Elantra compact and the Santa Fe crossover vehicle at plants in Alabama and Georgia. Kia builds the Sorento crossover vehicle in Georgia. Ford CEO Alan Mulally said he was appreciative of Obama’s efforts “to negotiate a meaningful free trade agreement with Korea. I know the U.S. government negotiated in good faith to improve the agreement for American automakers and workers.” Chrysler said in a statement it supported the administration’s effort to finalize “an enforceable agreement that provides meaningful market access for American-made vehicles in South Korea.” The U.S. auto market is about 10 times bigger than South Korea’s. There were 10.4 million vehicles sold in the United States last year. There were about 1.4 million sold in South Korea in 2009, according to the Korea Automobile Manufacturers Association. Regarding beef, South Korea halted imports of American beef after a Canadian-born cow infected with mad cow disease was discovered in the U.S. in 2003. Seoul eventually agreed to resume imports, but huge street demonstrations in response forced the government to backtrack and limit shipments to younger cows considered less at risk. The U.S. says its beef is safe. __ AP White House Correspondent Ben Feller, Associated Press writers Kwang-tae Kim, Hyung-jin Kim and Ken Thomas, and AP Auto Writers Tom Krisher and Dee-Ann Durbin in Detroit contributed to this report.

Read the full article →

Huntsberger, Bennett Join Security Benefit to Continue Growth, Focus in IMO Market Space

November 1, 2010

TOPEKA, KS–(Marketwire – November 1, 2010) –  Security Benefit is pleased to announce the recent hiring of Paul Huntsberger and Lee Bennett, who both have joined the Retail Markets Team and will be responsible for business development, relationship management and oversight of sales serving as Field Vice Presidents initially focused on the independent marketing organization (IMO) distribution market place.

Read the full article →

David Isenberg: We Don’t Need No Stinking Democracy

November 1, 2010

One of the perennial assumptions in the never ending debate about outsourcing and privatization is that doing so is more cost-effective. Don’t believe me? Try searching online for “cost-effective AND outsourcing” I just tried and received 1,210,000 hits on Google. But, to paraphrase Bill Clinton, it all depends on what you mean by cost-effective. There is more to it than just the lowest monetary cost. It appears that the very act of outsourcing creates a bureaucratic version of the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle , which in the social sciences is often taken to mean that the very act of observing a phenomenon inevitably alters that phenomenon in some way. This bring us to the article published in the Spring 2010 issue of the University of Chicago Law Review , titled ” Privatization’s Pretensions ” by Jon D. Michaels, Acting Professor of Law at the UCLA School of Law. Prof. Michaels writes, “For decades, policymakers have been privatizing government responsibilities for the customary, and ostensibly exclusive, objective of providing the public with the same goods and services more efficiently. It is becoming increasingly apparent that these policymakers are also doing something different: they are using that purportedly technocratic process to substantively alter the very policies they are supposed to be neutrally administering. And, it is working: these privatization “workarounds” can directly change the content of public education, health, and social welfare programs, the outcome of regulatory enforcement and rulemaking proceedings, and the trajectory of police and national security operations.” Well, why is that bad, you ask. Because, as Michaels writes: Workarounds provide outsourcing agencies with the means of accomplishing distinct policy goals that–but for the pretext of technocratic privatization–would either be legally unattainable or much more difficult to realize. In short, they are executive aggrandizing. They enable Presidents, governors, and mayors to exercise greater unilateral policy discretion–at the expense of legislators, courts, successor administrations, and the people. In plain English that means a gutting of the democratic process, or as Dick Cheney so fervently supported, a strengthening of the unitary executive theory of government. Or, to paraphrase the famous line from The Treasure of the Sierra Madre, we don’t need no stinking democracy. I am tempted to note that those who advocate for PMSC on efficiency grounds might remember that Italy’s Benito Mussolini also said that Italian fascism should have been welcomed because it made the trains run on time. As that is a popular myth I won’t belabor the point; at least not for now. Note that Michaels is not arguing against privatization per se. But he does note that we don’t even have the proper language and metrics to understand it: To care about workarounds, we need not be skeptical of executive authority, nor need we be hostile to privatization. We must simply appreciate that this powerful, potentially transformative phenomenon (1) raises novel questions that sound in separation of powers, intergenerational sovereignty, and democratic theory, and (2) has been overshadowed by the dominant, but analytically orthogonal, efficiency versus accountability debate. Because workarounds are undertheorized as well as underdeveloped as a regulatory matter, we currently lack the vocabulary, the data, and the tools to make thoughtful analytical and legal interventions. Michaels examines various agencies and scenarios. But with respect to PMSC here is the key section: Though concerns about military contracting typically sound in terms of oversight difficulties, cost overruns, and encroachments on inherently governmental responsibilities, increasing attention is being paid to an additional concern. As noted in the Introduction, out sourcing conceals the true scope and human costs of war efforts by understating the size of deployments and diluting casualty counts. A large percentage of our troop commitment in Iraq and Afghanistan is comprised of contractors. For example, a 2007 estimate had 180,000 contractors supporting roughly 160,000 troops in Iraq; to the extent official numbers list just the 160,000 military personnel, the government can give the impression that our footprint is only half its actual size. As Charles Tiefer has written, the Pentagon “ardently desired . . . to keep the illusion of a low number of troops.” The illusion was certainly enhanced by efforts, intentional or not, to conceal military contracts by routing them through civilian agencies, to refer to contract services in official documents in generic and arguably misleading terms (such as “information technology” specialists rather than as “interrogators”), and to complicate the contracting processes such that the federal government still has trouble providing an accurate contractor headcount. Private contractors are politically valuable insofar as they neither enter into official head or body counts–nor, it appears, into our hearts. That is to say, the nation identifies with its troops to a far greater extent than its contractors: “Americans are accustomed to hearing the military death toll . . . . But largely absent from the public consciousness are the thousands of civilians putting their lives on the line as contractors in Iraq.” Combining US military personnel and contractors in combat zones thus allows for contractors to lighten the troops’ share of long tours, injuries, and other physical and emotional hardships. But even more importantly, the aggregate loss of life (and quality of life) is discounted by the fact that we neither hear as much about nor, evidently, care as much about homesick or fallen contractors. This misperception of the war effort generates tangible effects that redound specifically to the executive’s benefit. Concealing these costs, the people are less sensitive to the President’s handling (or mishandling) of the military campaign. In turn, the executive has more political capital and thus more maneuverability in conducting the war. Indeed, without contractors: (1) the military engagement would have had to be smaller–a strategically problematic alternative; (2) the United States would have had to deploy its finite number of active personnel for even longer tours of duty -a politically dicey and short-sighted option; (3) the United States would have had to consider a civilian draft or boost retention and recruitment by raising military pay significantly–two politically untenable options; or (4) the need for greater commitments from other nations would have arisen and with it, the United States would have had to make more concessions to build and sustain a truly multinational effort. Thus, the tangible differences in the type of war waged, the effect on military personnel, and the need for coalition partners are greatly magnified when the government has the option to supplement its troops with contractors. Note, too, that the public may well catch on. As contractors become fixtures on the national security landscape and as the public starts demanding numerical accountings, will workarounds diminish in strategic value? And, if so, does that mean the executive as an agent of the people will be on a tighter leash? Obviously, one cannot draw any causal connection between growing calls for reducing America’s military presence in Iraq and greater awareness of contractors. But given how much we now know about contractors–compared to how little was known before the invasion and occupation of Iraq–one might query whether contractors will ever be used for such politically strategic purposes in future engagements. To me Michael’s most important point is to point out that the concern we should have is not about contractor’s being unaccountable. Rather it is that they are too accountable to the policymakers in the executive branch–yes, we are talking about the White House–who set the policy. For its part, the academic community has largely zeroed in on the government delegating sovereign authority to contractors–and those contractors’ frolics and detours. Concerned that the regulatory framework does not do enough to deter rogue contractors, or to bolster agencies’ efforts to limit contractor manipulations, scholars have sought to introduce, among other things, constitutional and administrative law norms into the privatization paradigm, and to have the contractors treated as state actors for legal purposes. However effective these approaches might be in reining in wayward contractors, there are important differences between (1) contractors who exploit the discretion afforded to them as proxies of the government and (2) agency officials directing workarounds through these proxies. With contractor abuse, the concern is unaccountability–a breakdown in the traditional principal-agent relationship. With workarounds, the contractors are not necessarily disloyal; indeed, they may be too accountable to their governmental counterparts–too willing to facilitate their policy altering agendas. Instead, it is the executive as unaccountable agent that changes the substance or the temporal duration of a policy in a manner potentially inconsistent with the expectations of its co-principals (namely, the coordinate branches, future administrations, the bureaucracy, and the people). In other words let’s not blame Xe Services etc etera for bad things that happen in war zones. Let’s blame U.S. policymakers who create those wars in the first place.

Read the full article →

Raymond J. Learsy: The President’s Misdirected Class Warfare

October 8, 2010

The Presidents militating against the extension of the Bush tax cuts for those families earning over $250,000 has become the banner issue of a cumulatively focused campaign being perceived by more and more of the nation’s citizens as stirring the dangerous specter of class warfare. According to Martin Feldstein, the noted economist and Harvard University professor, “The president has given the impression that he just doesn’t like business. That’s not his constituency. He doesn’t like high-income individuals, and he makes that very clear.” That he wants to extend the tax cuts for households earning under $250,000 dollars and permit the cuts to lapse on December 31 for those earning more. Yet according to Feldstein the economy is too week to raise taxes on anyone. In two years perhaps one could revisit the issue, but not now.(http://noir.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=a5pKRC0EGOI4): Hearing Obama’s Labor Day speech one can understand where Feldstein is coming from: “Anyone who thinks we can move this economy forward with a few doing well at the top, hoping it will trickle down to working folks running faster and faster just to keep up, they just haven’t studied our history.” Yet, in a way both miss the mark. There is anger abroad the land at those few who did well, but did it unfairly and destroyed our faith in what was once viewed as the vaunted ‘American meritocracy’. Obama, by painting all with the same brush is kindling the dangerous depths of the nation’s psyche, the politics of envy. Far better were he to focus his recriminations on those who warrant the anger. -As an aside, how many Americans feel anger toward the likes of Bill Gates? Very few I would venture. Rather they celebrate him for his achievement and vision, proud of his example of what can be realized in America. Far better to vent on those who through greed and influence have played the system to their own benefit and at painful cost of livelihood, home and sense of self respect of so many millions of Americans. In a lucid article in the New York Times (“Still Stuck in Denial” 10.02.10) Joe Nocera clearly spelled out Obama’s failings, citing Roosevelt’s 1936′s invocation over Wall Street, “They are unanimous in their hatred for me and I welcome their hatred.” Nocera goes on to expound: “The big banks aren’t being broken up the way they were in the 1930′s. Bankers aren’t being hauled off to jail. No serious effort has been made to rein in executive compensation or even to claw back millions of dollars in bonuses that were based on what turned out to be illusory profits. Most of the financial practices and products remain legal under the new Dodd-Frank legislation though they will finally be regulated. All things considered, Wall Street has gotten away pretty easy.” And that is the rub. Instead of class warfare, Obama could harness the rightful indignation and anger on a financial system that made literally billions selling products that were “ticking time bombs” exploding all over Main Street America and gravely impoverishing a middle class who have seen the value of their homes, if they still had one, their investments, their livelihood diminish drastically or vanish. If any of them can pick themselves up and rekindle the American dream again by becoming millionaires or billionaires, why more power to them and they should be held up as examples of what can be accomplished in this nation and not dismissed as a “few doing well at the top.” But the excesses and abuses of Wall Street with their billions of dollars bonus pools while families all over America were being evicted from their homes is another matter altogether. Perhaps the most feared action by those who gamed the system and that would be cheered through the length and breadth of the land would be to initiate actions necessary to effect the claw back of the billions of dollars that were disbursed as bonuses ($23 billion at Goldman Sachs alone) to the Wall Street multitude who feasted on those illusory profits and whose payouts were made possible by placing taxpayer monies at grave risk through the Tarp and other governmental programs. Programs that in essence saved the banks as otherwise they would have brought the whole system down. And then for them to reward themselves (please see “The Administration’s “Pay Czar” Soft Pedaling Bank Bonuses as “Ill Advised.” What is this Man Talking About?” 07.25.10) is what so deeply grates Americans. No, it is not whether families earning $250,000 are paying more or less taxes that is of visceral concern. The public feels they have been held up and the perpetrators are laughing all the way to bank which is probably still in business thanks to the bailout risks, they, the taxpayers undertook and for which they received little or no benefit, but rather foreclosed homes and lost jobs.

Read the full article →

Paul Abrams: The Politics and Economics of Tax Cuts: Make Each Bracket a Separate Bill, and a Separate Vote

September 20, 2010

It is very important for the Democrats to cut taxes for 98% and allow taxes to rise (4.6%) for the top 2%. To do that, they should write a separate tax bill for each bracket. They should bring each bracket, starting with the lowest, to a vote. This should be done in both Houses of Congress. The economic recovery depends upon both ends — providing more income to the 98% of the people to help repair their home balance sheets so they can feel comfortable about spending prudently again, and increasing revenues from the top 2% to build confidence in domestic and world financial markets that we can make some tough decisions. Republicans’ bitching and moaning would not get them very far. They would get a vote on the top 2%, and see how it fared. That process would shine klieg lights on the tax cuts, and debates and arguments could be advanced for each bracket. In the Senate, a filibuster of the lower rates would be a god-send to Democrats’ political fortunes, especially since Republicans can hardly argue that they will not get their vote for the wealthy, the people George Bush called “his base”. It would position the President to sign the cuts for each of the lower brackets, and defer deciding on the top 2% until the deficit commission reports in December whether the top 2% cut passes or not. The economic recovery that occurred under Reagan and under Clinton did not begin until each President raised taxes. That was not a coincidence. It had little to do with economic theory and everything to do with psychology: by biting the bullet, these Presidents showed domestic and world markets they were serious about deficits. Confidence grew and that led to investments and job growth. Cutting taxes for the top 2% would, on the other hand, very likely tank the stock market, send the dollar into a nose-dive, cause gold prices to soar and, through the lost-wealth effect, cause even further economic contraction. Why? Because it would show domestic and world markets that the United States of America is incapable of making tough fiscal decisions. Confidence in the United States would plummet and a vicious cycle could be triggered. It would also be a political disaster. It would portend even more draconian spending cuts in essential services down the road and, by causing a further economic decline, exacerbate the deficit even further. Republican extremists would like it, the Koch Boys would declare victory, but not everyone has the spare billions they do to ride it out. Republicans exist primarily for one purpose: to provide tax cuts for their wealthy paymasters like the Koch Boys and to allow as much economic anarchy as possible, each in the name of “limited government” that, curiously, does not seem to apply to staying out of peoples’ bedrooms, or end of life decisions, or lying us into wars, or voter intimidation. Of the two, tax cuts are much more important, since they can always pay their way out of regulations. That’s it. Everything else they do can be related directly back to these core imperatives. Of course, it is difficult to sell tax cuts for the wealthy alone, since 98% of the country is not financially wealthy. So, they drag in claptrap about lowering taxes for the wealthy creating more jobs (demonstrably false, and the worst alternative for stimulating growth) or “paying for themselves” (a canard dropped now even by rightwing economists who cannot sustain professional credibility by promoting it). So, it will be up to the Democrats to do the heavy lifting. Positioned properly, it will demonstrate to the mid-term electorate just who is on whose side. And, it will enable the economic recovery to pick up a bit of steam. “Class warfare”, you say? Such as that Republicans have been waging against the middle class? Well, it takes two sides to have a “war”. It is time our side showed up.

Read the full article →

Kevin O’Connor: Don’t Make the Solution Part of Your Problem

September 15, 2010

The problem I’ve always been intrigued with innovation and how it can be forced. As an entrepreneur, my job is to create new products and companies; I can’t just sit around waiting for the light to go off while playing Halo. As an executive, I have also been part of a lot of painful strategic planning processes. In one instance, we hired a consultant who took us through an eight month ordeal costing more than $1 million. In the end, we agreed on a strategy that we came up with on the first day. I’ve noticed this happen time and time again. From my experiences working with companies to solve various problems, I’ve noticed a few “truths” that almost always occur when groups try to solve problems: The answers are already in the room. If you assemble a group of smart people who know your industry, they have already assimilated the mass of information from customers, employees, market research and elsewhere. The answers are in the room and not on some manufactured spreadsheet. Most of the time spent trying to solve a problem is typically wasted discussing options that don’t really matter. There are 98 things you could , but shouldn’t, be doing, but in reality there are only two things you need to do as a business to be successful. People often waste time talking about all the things that don’t really matter. Personality trumps. Unfortunately, there isn’t much correlation between speaking skills and quality of ideas. Most people are afraid to share their ideas for fear of looking stupid. But then there are the less deserving people who through force of personality get their way. In order to actually implement the solution, you need consensus and these meetings rarely build lasting consensus. The solution As executives, our goal is to generate as many ideas as possible, identify the top ideas and make a decision while building consensus. But how can you most effectively do that? Just follow these steps: State the problem clearly. Write at the top of the white board the problem you are trying to solve. For example: “How can we improve productivity?”, “What are the biggest problems facing our customers?”, “Which Sports & Recreation topics are best for comparison?” Brainstorm. Ask people to state their ideas succinctly — usually two to three words. Do not allow any discussion or comments on the idea. You want people to play off other people’s ideas and to feel free to say crazy ideas without fear of ridicule. Keep the flow going but don’t beat a dead horse — stop when the flow of ideas has ended. Lobby. As you are numbering each proposed idea, allow people to lobby or clarify their ideas. Make sure you combine similar ideas. Vote. Take the total number of ideas and divide by three — this is the number of votes each person gets. For example, if you have 30 ideas, each person gets 10 votes (30 ideas/3 = 10 votes). The next step is to read off each idea, count the number of votes each idea receives and write the total number of votes next to each idea. Select Top Ideas. You should (hopefully) see a coalescing of votes for the top two to five ideas. Focus your attention on these top ideas and forget about the rest. Here’s a recent example of a brainstorm we just had at FindTheBest . We are constantly coming up with dozens of new Comparison App ideas, but having only limited resources, we only focus on the top ideas. We brainstormed new App ideas and came up with the following (partial) list: E-Readers (5 votes) Fast Food Nutrition (6) Colleges (5) Yogurt Nutrition (1) Venture Capital Firms (5) Planets (1) Designers (0) Empires (1) Travel by Country (3) Future Jobs and Careers Forecast (7) Pulitzer Prize Winners (5) Cosmetics Brands (1) War Statistics (4) State Facts (1) US Presidents (2) Energy Drinks (3) Dating Websites (3) Vegas Hotels (3) Golf Courses (4) Pokémon (5) After voting, we narrowed down our 60 App ideas to the seven most popular ones (the ideas that received 5 votes and higher) and focused on developing those Apps. This efficient and collaborative process provides a platform for all ideas to be heard and for the top ideas to be carried out. After trying this process out, you’ll realize that you’ve just condensed a four hour meeting into 30 minutes and actually found the best solution to your problem. But aside from finding the best solution to your problem, you’ve built consensus between everyone within the company because each person was involved in creating the solution. I’ve used this system many times to help create business and product ideas and strategies resulting in tremendous success. So go out and try this method and let me know how it works or if you need help. Please post a comment with your results.

Read the full article →

Dan Dorfman: From Wall Street: Obama Won’t Run Again

September 13, 2010

Mounting friction between Wall Street and the White House has taken on an intriguing new dimension, notably speculation from the investment community that President Obama will be so bruised by 2012 that he won’t even try to seek re-election. That’s a far cry from Wall Street ‘s thinking during the last national election when then presidential candidate Obama managed to captivate a fair share of the Street’s fat cats. At the time, a number of them looked upon him as an inspirational breath of political fresh air and backed him with their wallets. But that was yesterday. Today, he has lost most of his allure in the investment community, with many there condemning him. We’ve already seen numerous press reports taking note of the disillusionment with the Obama administration by Wall Street powerhouse Goldman Sachs and various hedge fund managers. You don’t need an Einstein IQ to figure out the basis for the disenchantment. The harsh, agonizing facts speak for themselves. In brief: The economy is in limbo, with housing and unemployment ongoing horror shows. John Q. Public is getting increasingly more jittery about its financial future. The stock market continues to bloody investors, who’ve been running for cover, their latest selling outburst the dumping of a huge7.6 billion worth of U.S. equity mutual funds in the week ended September 1. The country’s financial muscle, reflecting soaring debt, a burgeoning deficit and endless stimulus, is displaying much too much flab. Some rating agencies have even raised the possibility of downgrading U.S. debt. By their actions, some countries, such as China and Iran, are openly telling the United States to go to hell. It’s all prompting swelling Wall Street talk that Obama is a one term President. That’s also the thinking of San Francisco money manager Gary Wollin, who says “unless the Republicans put up someone who has been practicing canabalism, they can’t lose in 2012.” Noting that the president has been on the attack against Wall Street, in effect blaming it for killing Main Street, Wollin sees little Street support for Obama in the future. He also expects the President to lose much of his Jewish support from Wall Street, Hollywood and from far left progressives because of his strong pro-Arab stance. The Obama legacy, as he sees it, is one of “great expectations, but instead disappointment and plenty of it. It all adds up to what the polls say will be a Democratic drubbing in the mid-term elections even though, some Wall Streeters argue, the Republicans are exhibiting themselves as political deadbeats. Why so? Because, some Republican critics say, all they do is gripe about Obama, but fail to offer up a concrete set of proposals of their own to arrest the economic drag and get the country’s financial house in order. The belief on Wall Street is that the virtually certain big Republican win in November will reinforce the view that President Obama’s reign as America’s CEO is on borrowed time. It’s pretty much a repeat of what happens time and again in Corporate America. In brief, a company’s bottom line goes to pot, its stock price takes a dive and the CEO is booted out. In Obama’s case, the expectation is he will simply be voted out. Harry S. Dent, Jr., a Florida investment adviser, newsletter writer and author, takes it one step further. Dent, who expects the economy to be in a deep economic downturn by the second quarter of next year, a plight he sees extending into 2012 or 2013, believes Obama’s approval rating will be so low when the next national election rolls around that he will be afraid to run again. “The economy makes or breaks Presidents, not vice versa,” he says. “So with our economy failing and many signs indicating it will only get worse,” Obama,” contends Dent, “is politically dead.” The big economic problems, as he sees them, are the massive debt buildup and the likelihood of a major slowdown in consumption, spurred by a retirement-conscious baby boomer population that will be much more intent on saving than spending. Since he views the ailing economy as the number one voter issue, Dent sees the Democrats getting hammered in the upcoming elections and possibly losing both the House and Senate. In his latest commentary to his newsletter subscribers, Dent expressed the view that 2012 could witness an ultimate three-way race for the Presidency, The trio: Hillary Clinton, a far right nominee (Sarah Palin, Mitt Romney or Newt Gingrich) and Michael Bloomberg, who Dent expects to seek the White House as an independent candidate). If that were to happen, Dent says Bloomberg, an accomplished businessman, would be his top choice. At the same time, Dent thinks it’s possible that a more centrist candidate could emerge for the Republicans, say Jeb Bush, that is if he could overcome the legacy of George W. Bush. Like its stock recommendations, Wall Street’s political thoughts — more of which will soon be on their way, given the impending fall elections — can often influence people’s actions, especially investors who’ve seen their net worth shrink or are unemployed. So the Street’s views on politics, it’s felt, should not be taken lightly. Normally, a very bad economy will result in a landslide win for the party out of power, which would signal a Republican White House in 2012. The predominant thinking in Wall Street is that kind of a scenario is practically a sure thing in the next national election. Maybe so, but it’s worth keeping in mind that another sure thing — Hillary Clinton’s nomination as the Democrats’ Presidential nominee in 2008 — turned out to be a myth as Obama pulled off what many political pundits thought was the impossible. What do you think? E-mail me at Dandordan@aol.com.

Read the full article →

Robert Kuttner: Not Just Jobs — Good Jobs

September 5, 2010

On Labor Day 2010, we are short at least 25 million jobs. And just as importantly, we don’t have enough jobs that pay decently. The press last week was full of stories that the jobs picture was not as dismal as feared. The economy is actually generating jobs again — just not enough to make a dent in the backlog of 15 million Americans officially out of work and another 8 million with part time jobs seeking full time ones, and millions more out of the labor force entirely. In the government’s most recent report, released Friday, officially measured unemployment actually increased to 9.6 percent, just one tenth of a point below its rate last Labor Day. The stock market rose on reports that we will avert a “double-dip” recession. Economic growth is still in positive territory. But the economy grew at a decent rate after the Great Depression bottomed out in 1933, as well. Nonetheless, unemployment remained stuck in double digits for the next seven years, until World War II. As in the middle and late 1930s, economic growth is positive — just not strong enough to create sufficient jobs. This, of course, is the lingering fallout from the financial collapse of 2008, just as persistent unemployment in the Depression was the legacy of the Crash of 1929. But there is a larger story here that predates the recent financial collapse. The economy not only has a scarcity of jobs, but a shortage of good jobs. And while Republicans would resist legislating a serious public jobs program, the administration should fight for one anyway. And there is plenty that government could do right now to improve jobs pay via executive powers. One of those powers is government’s role as a contractor. The other is to enforce laws already on the books that prohibit employers from stealing wages and that guarantee workers the right to join or organize unions. The Obama administration has made some heartening steps in both directions, but it could do a great deal more. Federal procurement, directly or indirectly, affects about one fourth of the jobs in the economy. In past administrations, government procurement was used as leverage to stop deeply entrenched patterns of racism in hiring and promotion. Before there were the votes in Congress to pass the great civil rights acts of the mid-1960s, Presidents Kennedy and Johnson used executive orders to require corporations bidding on federal contracts to end discriminatory practices. And during World War II, President Roosevelt’s War Labor Board required that companies with war production contracts have good labor relations — which meant acceptance of unions when workers voted for them. In the Obama administration, the Labor Department is getting an additional $25 million to better enforce wage and hour laws. And the Vice President’s Task Force on Middle Class Working Families is doing important work, though with a tiny staff. Obama, early in his term, issued four executive orders that mainly corrected for anti-labor orders by George W. Bush, but these do not take full advantage of the leverage that government has. Today, President Obama could issue orders requiring that companies bidding on government contracts behave as decent employers. This would be the game-changer. Unfortunately, companies that are flagrant union-busters, such as Fedex, still get billions in government work. Corporations that routinely disguise permanent workers as temps or independent contractors, in order to reduce their wages and rights, are still on the approved list. And contractors in agriculture that pay starvation wages and have appalling working conditions for farm workers still supply food products for the school lunch program and even for the Pentagon’s MREs — Meals Ready to Eat — for America’s service men and women. The American Prospect has just published a special report on all the things government could be doing — without new legislation — to turn bad jobs into decent ones. The high rate of joblessness has gotten nearly all the attention. But the declining quality and pay of most jobs is every bit as big a problem. Wages, adjusted for inflation, have barely risen in three decades, while productivity has doubled. Nearly all of the gains have gone to the very top. Very high unemployment only exacerbated that trend, because it puts job-seekers into competition with one another for the available work, and undermines any remaining leverage for raises, a word we don’t hear much lately. Even before the recession started, in the period from 2000 to 2007, only about three percent of the workforce managed to increase their earnings adjusted for inflation. The long term trend reflects an epic shift in the bargaining power of workers and managers. The causes are multiple. Unions have been weakened by relentless union-busting by industry, while government has largely failed to enforce worker rights to organize or join unions under the Wagner Act. Increased trade with countries that pursue predatory trade practices and that recognize no worker rights has undercut wages in the U.S. Companies that once had tacit social compacts with their stakeholders now feel free to outsource work if someone else will do it cheaper. Supposedly, education and training is the cure-all. But think about it. Back in the 1950s, when most Americans did not go to college and the average factory worker didn’t finish high school, our income distribution was far more equal and we had a blue-collar middle class. Today, tens of millions of college graduates are working at jobs that don’t require a college degree. Some professions that require extensive education have had fairly flat earnings over the past decade. Certainly we need a well educated workforce, but that by itself does not assure decent wages. In the 1940s, ’50s, and ’60s, median wages and the economy’s average productivity growth moved upwards in lockstep. The income distribution actually became more equal. That trend had little to do with the fact that workers were becoming better educated — and everything to do with the economy’s “equalizing institutions.” These included an effective labor movement, backed by government’s commitment to enforce worker rights and to expand opportunities. President Obama is in political trouble today because people are anxious about both their jobs and their paychecks. He could help himself and all working Americans by moving more boldly on both fronts. Robert Kuttner’s new book is A Presidency in Peril . He is co-editor of The American Prospect and a Senior Fellow at Demos.

Read the full article →

Robert Kuttner: Not Just Jobs — Good Jobs

September 5, 2010

On Labor Day 2010, we are short at least 25 million jobs. And just as importantly, we don’t have enough jobs that pay decently. The press last week was full of stories that the jobs picture was not as dismal as feared. The economy is actually generating jobs again — just not enough to make a dent in the backlog of 15 million Americans officially out of work and another 8 million with part time jobs seeking full time ones, and millions more out of the labor force entirely. In the government’s most recent report, released Friday, officially measured unemployment actually increased to 9.6 percent, just one tenth of a point below its rate last Labor Day. The stock market rose on reports that we will avert a “double-dip” recession. Economic growth is still in positive territory. But the economy grew at a decent rate after the Great Depression bottomed out in 1933, as well. Nonetheless, unemployment remained stuck in double digits for the next seven years, until World War II. As in the middle and late 1930s, economic growth is positive — just not strong enough to create sufficient jobs. This, of course, is the lingering fallout from the financial collapse of 2008, just as persistent unemployment in the Depression was the legacy of the Crash of 1929. But there is a larger story here that predates the recent financial collapse. The economy not only has a scarcity of jobs, but a shortage of good jobs. And while Republicans would resist legislating a serious public jobs program, the administration should fight for one anyway. And there is plenty that government could do right now to improve jobs pay via executive powers. One of those powers is government’s role as a contractor. The other is to enforce laws already on the books that prohibit employers from stealing wages and that guarantee workers the right to join or organize unions. The Obama administration has made some heartening steps in both directions, but it could do a great deal more. Federal procurement, directly or indirectly, affects about one fourth of the jobs in the economy. In past administrations, government procurement was used as leverage to stop deeply entrenched patterns of racism in hiring and promotion. Before there were the votes in Congress to pass the great civil rights acts of the mid-1960s, Presidents Kennedy and Johnson used executive orders to require corporations bidding on federal contracts to end discriminatory practices. And during World War II, President Roosevelt’s War Labor Board required that companies with war production contracts have good labor relations — which meant acceptance of unions when workers voted for them. In the Obama administration, the Labor Department is getting an additional $25 million to better enforce wage and hour laws. And the Vice President’s Task Force on Middle Class Working Families is doing important work, though with a tiny staff. Obama, early in his term, issued four executive orders that mainly corrected for anti-labor orders by George W. Bush, but these do not take full advantage of the leverage that government has. Today, President Obama could issue orders requiring that companies bidding on government contracts behave as decent employers. This would be the game-changer. Unfortunately, companies that are flagrant union-busters, such as Fedex, still get billions in government work. Corporations that routinely disguise permanent workers as temps or independent contractors, in order to reduce their wages and rights, are still on the approved list. And contractors in agriculture that pay starvation wages and have appalling working conditions for farm workers still supply food products for the school lunch program and even for the Pentagon’s MREs — Meals Ready to Eat — for America’s service men and women. The American Prospect has just published a special report on all the things government could be doing — without new legislation — to turn bad jobs into decent ones. The high rate of joblessness has gotten nearly all the attention. But the declining quality and pay of most jobs is every bit as big a problem. Wages, adjusted for inflation, have barely risen in three decades, while productivity has doubled. Nearly all of the gains have gone to the very top. Very high unemployment only exacerbated that trend, because it puts job-seekers into competition with one another for the available work, and undermines any remaining leverage for raises, a word we don’t hear much lately. Even before the recession started, in the period from 2000 to 2007, only about three percent of the workforce managed to increase their earnings adjusted for inflation. The long term trend reflects an epic shift in the bargaining power of workers and managers. The causes are multiple. Unions have been weakened by relentless union-busting by industry, while government has largely failed to enforce worker rights to organize or join unions under the Wagner Act. Increased trade with countries that pursue predatory trade practices and that recognize no worker rights has undercut wages in the U.S. Companies that once had tacit social compacts with their stakeholders now feel free to outsource work if someone else will do it cheaper. Supposedly, education and training is the cure-all. But think about it. Back in the 1950s, when most Americans did not go to college and the average factory worker didn’t finish high school, our income distribution was far more equal and we had a blue-collar middle class. Today, tens of millions of college graduates are working at jobs that don’t require a college degree. Some professions that require extensive education have had fairly flat earnings over the past decade. Certainly we need a well educated workforce, but that by itself does not assure decent wages. In the 1940s, ’50s, and ’60s, median wages and the economy’s average productivity growth moved upwards in lockstep. The income distribution actually became more equal. That trend had little to do with the fact that workers were becoming better educated — and everything to do with the economy’s “equalizing institutions.” These included an effective labor movement, backed by government’s commitment to enforce worker rights and to expand opportunities. President Obama is in political trouble today because people are anxious about both their jobs and their paychecks. He could help himself and all working Americans by moving more boldly on both fronts. Robert Kuttner’s new book is A Presidency in Peril . He is co-editor of The American Prospect and a Senior Fellow at Demos.

Read the full article →

Robert Kuttner: Not Just Jobs — Good Jobs

September 5, 2010

On Labor Day 2010, we are short at least 25 million jobs. And just as importantly, we don’t have enough jobs that pay decently. The press last week was full of stories that the jobs picture was not as dismal as feared. The economy is actually generating jobs again — just not enough to make a dent in the backlog of 15 million Americans officially out of work and another 8 million with part time jobs seeking full time ones, and millions more out of the labor force entirely. In the government’s most recent report, released Friday, officially measured unemployment actually increased to 9.6 percent, just one tenth of a point below its rate last Labor Day. The stock market rose on reports that we will avert a “double-dip” recession. Economic growth is still in positive territory. But the economy grew at a decent rate after the Great Depression bottomed out in 1933, as well. Nonetheless, unemployment remained stuck in double digits for the next seven years, until World War II. As in the middle and late 1930s, economic growth is positive — just not strong enough to create sufficient jobs. This, of course, is the lingering fallout from the financial collapse of 2008, just as persistent unemployment in the Depression was the legacy of the Crash of 1929. But there is a larger story here that predates the recent financial collapse. The economy not only has a scarcity of jobs, but a shortage of good jobs. And while Republicans would resist legislating a serious public jobs program, the administration should fight for one anyway. And there is plenty that government could do right now to improve jobs pay via executive powers. One of those powers is government’s role as a contractor. The other is to enforce laws already on the books that prohibit employers from stealing wages and that guarantee workers the right to join or organize unions. The Obama administration has made some heartening steps in both directions, but it could do a great deal more. Federal procurement, directly or indirectly, affects about one fourth of the jobs in the economy. In past administrations, government procurement was used as leverage to stop deeply entrenched patterns of racism in hiring and promotion. Before there were the votes in Congress to pass the great civil rights acts of the mid-1960s, Presidents Kennedy and Johnson used executive orders to require corporations bidding on federal contracts to end discriminatory practices. And during World War II, President Roosevelt’s War Labor Board required that companies with war production contracts have good labor relations — which meant acceptance of unions when workers voted for them. In the Obama administration, the Labor Department is getting an additional $25 million to better enforce wage and hour laws. And the Vice President’s Task Force on Middle Class Working Families is doing important work, though with a tiny staff. Obama, early in his term, issued four executive orders that mainly corrected for anti-labor orders by George W. Bush, but these do not take full advantage of the leverage that government has. Today, President Obama could issue orders requiring that companies bidding on government contracts behave as decent employers. This would be the game-changer. Unfortunately, companies that are flagrant union-busters, such as Fedex, still get billions in government work. Corporations that routinely disguise permanent workers as temps or independent contractors, in order to reduce their wages and rights, are still on the approved list. And contractors in agriculture that pay starvation wages and have appalling working conditions for farm workers still supply food products for the school lunch program and even for the Pentagon’s MREs — Meals Ready to Eat — for America’s service men and women. The American Prospect has just published a special report on all the things government could be doing — without new legislation — to turn bad jobs into decent ones. The high rate of joblessness has gotten nearly all the attention. But the declining quality and pay of most jobs is every bit as big a problem. Wages, adjusted for inflation, have barely risen in three decades, while productivity has doubled. Nearly all of the gains have gone to the very top. Very high unemployment only exacerbated that trend, because it puts job-seekers into competition with one another for the available work, and undermines any remaining leverage for raises, a word we don’t hear much lately. Even before the recession started, in the period from 2000 to 2007, only about three percent of the workforce managed to increase their earnings adjusted for inflation. The long term trend reflects an epic shift in the bargaining power of workers and managers. The causes are multiple. Unions have been weakened by relentless union-busting by industry, while government has largely failed to enforce worker rights to organize or join unions under the Wagner Act. Increased trade with countries that pursue predatory trade practices and that recognize no worker rights has undercut wages in the U.S. Companies that once had tacit social compacts with their stakeholders now feel free to outsource work if someone else will do it cheaper. Supposedly, education and training is the cure-all. But think about it. Back in the 1950s, when most Americans did not go to college and the average factory worker didn’t finish high school, our income distribution was far more equal and we had a blue-collar middle class. Today, tens of millions of college graduates are working at jobs that don’t require a college degree. Some professions that require extensive education have had fairly flat earnings over the past decade. Certainly we need a well educated workforce, but that by itself does not assure decent wages. In the 1940s, ’50s, and ’60s, median wages and the economy’s average productivity growth moved upwards in lockstep. The income distribution actually became more equal. That trend had little to do with the fact that workers were becoming better educated — and everything to do with the economy’s “equalizing institutions.” These included an effective labor movement, backed by government’s commitment to enforce worker rights and to expand opportunities. President Obama is in political trouble today because people are anxious about both their jobs and their paychecks. He could help himself and all working Americans by moving more boldly on both fronts. Robert Kuttner’s new book is A Presidency in Peril . He is co-editor of The American Prospect and a Senior Fellow at Demos.

Read the full article →

Vivian Norris de Montaigu: Restoring Trust Is the First Step Forward to Heal from the Financial Crisis

September 3, 2010

Why did I vote for President Obama? I trusted him, and I still do. Why do so many Americans want Elizabeth Warren in a position of power and financial decision-making? Because they trust her to tell them the truth and do right by them. Why is the Banker to the Poor, Muhammad Yunus (who earns around 400 euros per month) trusted by millions around the world, yet the CEOs, CFOs and Presidents of major financial institutions are not only not trusted, they are despised? It all comes down to trust. Fool me once, shame on you, fool me twice, shame on me. And I don’t want to be fooled again. Neither do 300 million Americans. Neither does much of the rest of the world. In other words, we are over these guys in suits with their private jets and trophy wives. We are over the tennis buddy behind the scenes deal making insider information trading buying our politicians and leaving us with the bill and our president with a mess to clean up…it stops now. Ironically, the very word for “credit” credire …means to believe in or trust. Trust is behind the entire concept of banking. What do the poorest of the poor in Muhammad Yunus Microcredit world and the wealthiest financial institutions have in common? Access to credit with no collateral to back up the loans. Yet the poorest of the poor in the Grameen Bank world pay back at rates as high as 99%. Those big banks not only did not pay back, they took from us and paid themselves bonuses. Hmmm…guess they aren’t very good bankers are they? Because they have destroyed the very trust they need to get us to give them our money, invest it and give us something back. It feels like they are, well, stealing our money doesn’t it? Perhaps the reason there is still trust in Dr Yunus’ world is because 98% of the poorest of the poor Grameen borrowers who are trying to make better lives for themselves and their children are women? Yunus noticed that women paid back better than the men, and used the money and profits from their small businesses to help their families so he focused on loaning to them. It is looking like most of the mess in the Western financial world is being caused by a handful of men, men with inflated egos, Narcissists so removed from how most people live their lives that one begins to feel that they actually believe they are somehow not entirely human. But the fact is, they are human, just like all of the rest of us. And we simply do not trust them anymore, and most likely never will again. So let’s get the investors and board members and depositors to change things, shake it up, remove these guys and put some women in charge, and those in whom we actually have trust again. Then and only then will America have a banking system worth believing in, and until then, well, it’s pretty much Us against Them. And I have a pretty strong feeling They are going to Lose. Because there are more of us, and we actually are rediscovering our power both politically and economically. Move your money. Call your representatives. Educate your children about the political process. Rebuild your communities and help those in need. There are so many people not finding work after losing their jobs. There is so much good will and energy among young people who want to remain optimistic about their future. America will be whole again and it will be even better now that we have woken up from this fantasy. Turn off the TV. Dust off your bicycle. Have a block party and get to know your neighbors. Grow a garden. Learn to cook really healthy meals. Spend time with your partner and children. Read! It is time to slow down and rethink things. Use this time wisely. Become informed about the world. You are more powerful than you know. You can make a decision and act on it. Once you shift your perspective and take action, everything begins to shift. If we all do it together, a wave of good will and rebuilding will take root. It already is. P.S. — After taking a real vacation this summer, turning off the cell phone and disconnecting from email, I realized how very important it is to make time for doing nothing in order to come back re-energized and with new ideas. Check out some of them here . And at Vigilante-vnm.com and on Twitter

Read the full article →

Brown & Brown, Inc. Elects Scott Penny as Regional President

July 22, 2010

DAYTONA BEACH, FL and TAMPA, FL–(Marketwire – July 22, 2010) –  The Board of Directors of Brown & Brown, Inc. ( NYSE : BRO ) today announced that J. Scott Penny, CIC, has been promoted to the position of Regional President. Mr. Penny, who has served as one of the Company’s Regional Executive Vice Presidents since 2002, is responsible for oversight of retail profit center operations of certain of the Company’s subsidiaries in Connecticut, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, New Hampshire, New York, Ohio, and Washington. Mr. Penny also oversees the operations of Axiom Re, Inc. in Florida and North Carolina.

Read the full article →

Rural/Metro Implements Regional Zone Operating Structure to Enhance National Growth Objectives

July 21, 2010

Company Appoints Industry Leaders as Zone Vice Presidents

Read the full article →

Robert Creamer: One Big Thing Congress Can Do to Improve the Economy Before Election Day

July 11, 2010

Members of Congress see it in their town meetings, their mail, their polls and focus groups: the voters are angry. Of course at any given time, some set of voters are always unhappy. But right now it’s different. Right now most people are unhappy. The level of anger and unhappiness does not arise from disagreement with some government policy. It is not because they don’t like the new health care law, or “big government”. Voters are angry and unhappy because from their perspective the economy still stinks. Vast numbers of those who lost their jobs when the recklessness of the Wall Street banks sent the economy over the cliff, are still out of work. Those who are working have experienced stagnant incomes. Everyday Americans are worried about the economic futures of their families. And it’s no wonder. A recent study showed that more than half of Americans have been directly affected by the recession. When Congress returns from its Fourth of July recess, there are not many things it can actually do to improve the economic picture in the four short months before Election Day. But there is, in fact, one thing Congress can do that will have a big impact right away: pass a jobs bill that provides fiscal relief to state and local government and extends unemployment benefits . State and local government is facing the worst fiscal crisis in a generation. The recession slashed revenue, yet the same recession increased the demand for many critical services. As a result there is a very real chance that in the next few months state and local government will lay off between 600,000 and 800,000 people. That result would be catastrophic for the already-weak economic recovery — as well as the political environment for Democrats. Let’s say that the economy generates a fairly robust 150,000 new private sector jobs each month. That’s a total of 600,000 new jobs between now and November. But that job growth could be entirely wiped out by layoffs from state and local government. If private sector job growth is slower, then these layoffs could move the job figures into negative territory. That could very well pull economic growth into the red as well triggering a double dip recession. And extending unemployment benefits is equally critical. The Labor Department says more than 1.7 million people have run out of unemployment benefits, and that figure could rise to more than 2.1 million people by the end of this week. Americans who are out of work are not laggards who want something for nothing. They are — by definition — seeking jobs that the economy does not provide. Does it make any sense that Congress could find the money to bail out Wall Street bankers and their $10 million bonuses and can’t afford to make sure that the victims of Wall Street recklessness have something to keep their families from falling into poverty until they can find work? More crucial to the cold calculus of economic growth, by blocking Congress from extending unemployment benefits, the Republicans have withdrawn millions of dollars of potential spending from the economy — money that would otherwise have been spent at the grocery store or the mall. That’s just plain stupid. Of course you hear the Republicans — and some Democrats — blathering on about how an extension of unemployment benefits or fiscal relief to the states must be “paid for” through other cuts or new revenue. They argue that the public is “fed up” with rising deficits and we must restore “fiscal discipline” now. You didn’t hear a peep from the Republicans when it comes to “un-paid for” funding to support the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. And there is a case of collective Republican amnesia when it comes to the fact that when Democrat Bill Clinton left office there were fiscal surpluses as far as the eye could see — and that in eight short years, the Bush Administration ran up more in national debt than all of the other Presidents in American history combined. Nor does any Republican reference former Vice-President Cheney’s famous observation that “deficits don’t matter.” But as a matter of sheer economics, we do not need “fiscal discipline now.” We need economic growth now. Economic growth is the only real path to assure a shrinking deficit and a healthy fiscal policy over the next decade. The “real economy” is not composed of loans, money flows, currency transactions, or stock markets. The “real economy” is the process of creating goods and services that meet people’s needs. Truck drivers, fire fighters, farmers, steelworkers, software engineers, tailors, janitors, writers, teachers — most people who work for a living — are all engaged in “real” economic activity. The flow of money is not the “real economy” at all. It is a means of keeping score — a means of allocating who gets what – of determining what products are produced and what services are provided. That doesn’t mean that the level of personal debt, or the federal deficit, or the price of the dollar aren’t critically important to economy. But they are ultimately only important insofar as they impact what goes on in the “real economy” — the quantity and mix of goods and services. That’s why the biggest economic problem we face in the short term is not the federal deficit — it is the deficit between the capacity of our economy to produce goods and services and the amount of economic demand there is to pay people to engage in productive activity. Right now, nine and half percent of our work force is sitting idle, not producing the goods and services people need to enjoy a better life. The goods and services they would have produced on any given day are simply wasted — lost forever. As a society, we miss out on the housing they could have built, the food they could have produced, the software they could have designed, the research they could have done. That is actual economic waste. It means there is simply less economic pie to go around. And since the top two percent of the population do a pretty good job making sure they get a big slice, you can bet that average Americans are the ones who are stuck with smaller and smaller pieces of pie. So our first priority is to eliminate the deficit between our productive capacity and what we are actually producing as a society. First and foremost we have to get people back to work. In other words, putting people back to work is not a “lagging indicator” of economic growth. It is economic growth. Economic growth is about nothing other than people working to produce more goods and services. The problem is that in recessions, individual consumers and businesses cut back on spending. They set money aside and reduce the demand for goods and services. During the current recession the savings rate in the U.S. went from only 1% to 6.4%. Now it’s 4%. In fact, over the long haul our society should be saving more, but the problem is that a big increase in saving during a recession reduces economic demand and just deepens the spiral of fewer people working and less demand, which leads to more layoffs and less demand and so on. So while it is perfectly rational for an individual or family to cut back its spending and save more when times are tough, that is a disaster for the overall economy. But acting together through the government we can break that spiral. That was the great lesson that John Maynard Keynes learned from the Great Depression. The federal government has to act decisively to close the deficit between productive capacity and actual production — it needs to create the economic demand to assure that everyone is back at work. To do that it has to borrow money. That’s what is necessary to put the economy back on its feet and grow private sector demand once again. We did it in early 2009 with the Stimulus Bill that saved or created almost 3 million jobs. We need to do more. There is absolutely no evidence that the increase in public sector debt necessary to spur demand and put people back to work has been “crowding out” private borrowing or raising interest rates. In fact interest rates are at record lows. The Federal Funds rate is near zero. Over the last year the yields on long-term bonds have actually dropped. There is, in other words, less competition to place debt than a year ago. In fact, the markets are more concerned with the prospect of deflation, not inflation. President Obama and the Democratic leadership of both the House and Senate have pushed hard for measures that would prevent state and local layoffs and extend unemployment. The Republicans have obstinately opposed these measures. And there are some Democrats who worry that a vote for a jobs bill would leave them vulnerable to a charge that they are “tax and spend” liberals. But let’s face it, the Republicans are going to say that no matter what they do. The real question between now and the election is whether the Congress can do anything to make voters feel that their personal economic situation is improving. The real question for voters in November won’t be if a Member of Congress voted yes or no on House Bill “whatever.” It will be whether their brother-in-law found work. The last thing Democrats can afford is to go into Election Day with is an economy that is actually losing jobs once again. That is exactly what may happen if Congress does not pass state fiscal relief and extend unemployment benefits. That would lead to a political narrative that is much more toxic for Democrats in swing districts than any single vote – certainly not a vote to save the jobs of firemen, police officers, teachers, the people who care for the elderly and the men and women who repair our roads. One final note. The Republicans often blithely argue that “only the private sector creates real jobs.” They need to get out of their ivory towers and fancy think tanks and look around. In the economic sense, “real” jobs include any job that actually produces goods and services that add to the store of our collective well-being. Next time you need a police officer, ask him if he has a “real job.” How about the teacher who teaches Johnny to be a productive member of our society? What about the guy who builds the road you drive to work on; or the fellow who cleans the street after the ball game? What about the person who empties the bed pan for an elderly veteran in a nursing home? Now compare the contribution these people make to our collective well-being with the trader at Goldman Sachs that bets on the price of exotic derivatives for a living. Congress must pass fiscal relief for the states as soon as possible. And while it’s at it, the Senate needs to finish the job of holding the big Wall Street banks accountable that caused this economic mess in the first place. Robert Creamer is a long-time political organizer and strategist, and author of the recent book: Stand Up Straight: How Progressives Can Win, available on Amazon.com .

Read the full article →

Nancy E. Soderberg: Investors Can’t Trust Argentina

June 25, 2010

“Tis deeds must win the prize” says the character in Taming of the Shrew . The global bond market has bestowed no prize upon Argentina, since its president Cristina Fernandez de Kirchner has performed no deeds worthy of any. Last month, Argentina put forward its Global 2017 bond offering but the markets are not buying, forcing the government to extend its offer until June 22, a stunning vote of no confidence in the policies of President Kirchner. The international message to Argentina was loud and clear: No deeds, no prize. Investors don’t trust you, or your policies. Looking over Argentina’s record on financial responsibility, it’s no wonder why. Granted, President Kirchner inherited a fiscal mess. Foremost was the country’s 2001 default on $81 billion of debt, which turned it into a financial pariah. Yet having been handed a bad situation, she only made it worse, much worse. She continued Argentina’s willful default and creditor abuse, while promoting policies which pushed up inflation and pushed down investor confidence. Here’s how: in 2005, Argentina forced a restructuring of about three-quarters of its private debt, at 27-cents on the dollar. It arranged to pay off $9.8 billion in government debt through the International Monetary Fund. But it failed to restructure another $7 billion in Paris Club debt by refusing to allow the standard IMF audit. Instead, in 2008, President Kirchner raided private pension plans, nationalizing them and seizing their $25 billion in assets to keep Argentina’s economy afloat. Over the past decade, Argentina has defiantly dismissed court judgments, anywhere and everywhere. Such judgments, totaling 160 in New York State alone, mandate that Argentina pay its debts. In rejecting these judgments, President Kirchner touts her refusal to obey the courts as a badge of honor. She just-as-proudly suggests that Argentina now be allowed to issue new bonds. In fact, Argentina’s debt restructuring is now worse than in 2005, offering only 25 cents on the dollar and ignoring the years of accrued interest and penalties. Once again, it put the offer forward on a take-it-or-leave-it offer and has allowed no good faith negotiations with external creditors and ordinary bondholders. President Kirchner eventually reached her goal of sixty percent acceptance rate of its offer after the extended June 22 deadline, but Argentina still owes over $30 billion, keeping it from entering the credit markets. It will continue to be considered a financial pariah until it fully settles these debts, including interests and fees, as well as the myriad legal judgments against it. It must also resolve outstanding issues in the international arena, including the Paris Club, the International Center for the Settlement of Investment Disputes , the U.N. Commission on Trade Laws, and the International Chamber of Commerce. Had Argentina taken the responsible road and faced its debts, it would now have access to affordable international finance and international investment, as well as far better economic prospects. By refusing to act responsibly, President Kirchner is digging a hole for her country. If she goes on, she will turn it into a Spanish-speaking Zimbabwe. What are the deeds needed to win the prize, of international acceptance and financial responsibility? It’s rather simple: Argentinean officials need to open talks with their foreign lenders and work out a plan to reschedule its full debt repayments. Holding foreign currency worth $49 billion, they can afford to do so. Rejoining the credit markets would also free Argentina from some of its most disastrous domestic policy choices which are frightening away foreign investors, killing businesses, and undermining the private sector. The right policies can help to create jobs, stimulate investment, and generate wealth for the Argentinean people. In the months ahead, President Kirchner faces a stark choice between a legacy of terminal decline, or a new beginning for her country based upon economic responsibility and a willingness to rejoin the world economy. Will she be remembered as a stubborn failure or as a leader who rescued her nation? The bond market’s actions should serve as her wake up call to act responsibly. The deeds needed are evident and the prize worth winning. Nancy Soderberg and Ken Adelman served as Ambassadors of the United States to the United Nations under Presidents Bill Clinton and Ronald Reagan respectively.

Read the full article →

Exxon Distances Itself From BP’s `Dramatic Departure’ in Gulf Oil Disaster

June 15, 2010

By Joe Carroll June 15 (Bloomberg) — Federal investigators must determine if BP Plc took risks “beyond industry norms” with the Gulf of Mexico well that exploded and caused the worst U.S. oil spill, Exxon Mobil Corp. Chief Executive Officer Rex Tillerson said. The April 20 disaster that killed 11 workers and sank Transocean Ltd. ’s Deepwater Horizon drilling rig “represents a dramatic departure” from the track record of deep-water oil explorers, Tillerson said in remarks prepared for a House Energy and Commerce Committee panel hearing today. Something went wrong at the BP project about 5,000 feet (1,524 meters) below the sea surface that hasn’t happened at the 14,000 other deep-water wells drilled without incident worldwide, Tillerson said. The catastrophe has damaged livelihoods and coastal environments and will cause loss of public trust in the oil industry, he said. “We need to know if the levels of risk taken went beyond industry norms,” said Tillerson, who oversees a company that pumps more oil than every member of OPEC except Saudi Arabia, Iran and Iraq. Exxon, based in Irving, Texas, has drilled 262 deep-water wells in the past decade, 35 of which were in the Gulf of Mexico, he said. Proper well design, workforce training, redundant safety systems and regular maintenance help mitigate the risks involved in drilling miles below sea level, Tillerson said in the remarks. ‘Questionable Decisions’ BP, the biggest oil producer in the Gulf of Mexico, made five “questionable decisions” aimed at cutting costs and speeding completion of an overdue project in the days and weeks preceding the disaster, U.S. Representatives Henry Waxman of California and Bart Stupak of Michigan wrote in a letter to BP CEO Tony Hayward that was released yesterday. Hayward is scheduled to testify before U.S. lawmakers on June 17. David Nicholas , a BP spokesman, said in an e-mail it would be inappropriate to comment ahead of Hayward’s testimony. Exxon overhauled its safety procedures after the 1989 Valdez tanker spill off the Alaskan coast, Tillerson said in his remarks. The Valdez incident, which Tillerson described as “the low point’ in Exxon’s history, was one of the worst U.S. spills before the failure of BP’s Macondo well. John Watson , chief executive officer at Chevron Corp. , and ConocoPhillips CEO James Mulva are scheduled to testify at today’s hearing in Washington. Lamar McKay and Marvin Odum , the presidents of the U.S. units of BP and Royal Dutch Shell Plc , respectively, have also accepted invitations. Increased Scrutiny Shell follows well-drilling safety standards that lawmakers have said were sidestepped by BP, Odum said in a May 14 letter to Elizabeth Birnbaum , former director of the U.S. Minerals Management Service, which oversees the offshore drilling industry. Shell’s plans to explore for oil and natural gas off Alaska’s coast face increased scrutiny as a result of the Gulf oil spill. “Shell has design standards and practices that have enabled us to successfully and safely drill many deep-water and shallow-water wells worldwide,” Odum said in the letter to Birnbaum. “Shell will rigorously apply an appropriate similar level of standards in all well operations on the Alaska” outer continental shelf. More than 30 deep-water rigs have been ordered to stop drilling in the Gulf of Mexico for at least six months while federal officials conduct a review of offshore safety practices. The moratorium has forced Exxon, Shell and other major oil companies to suspend their deepwater exploration plans in the Gulf. Rigs Leaving The Gulf accounts for 30 percent of U.S. oil production, according to the Energy Information Administration. When the moratorium is lifted and federal regulators allow deep-water oil exploration to resume, there may be few rigs remaining in the Gulf of Mexico to do the work, said Gianna Bern , president of Brookshire Advisory & Research Inc. in Flossmoor, Illinois, which advises oil companies on strategy and risk management. Drilling vessels are starting to leave the Gulf to take up assignments in the South China Sea and offshore Indonesia, said Bern, a former BP crude trader. Those vessels won’t be able to return to U.S. waters for a year or longer, she said. “This is a challenging time for everyone in the industry because there’s some level of guilt by association going on,” Bern said. “With oil continuing to spew out in the Gulf of Mexico, the whole industry is going to be set back.” To contact the reporter on this story: Joe Carroll in Washington at jcarroll8@bloomberg.net .

Read the full article →

Exxon, Chevron Seek Reprieve From `Crucifixion’ Over BP’s Gulf Oil Spill

June 14, 2010

By Joe Carroll June 14 (Bloomberg) — Exxon Mobil Corp., Chevron Corp. and ConocoPhillips, the largest U.S. oil companies, will ask lawmakers not to punish them for the human and environmental damage inflicted by BP Plc’s oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico. Exxon Chief Executive Officer Rex Tillerson , Chevron CEO John Watson and James Mulva , CEO of ConocoPhillips , are scheduled to appear tomorrow before a House Energy and Commerce Committee panel examining offshore drilling safety and U.S. energy policy. The hearing presents the U.S. oil CEOs with an opportunity to distance their companies from BP, said Anthony Sabino , who teaches oil and natural-gas law at St. John’s University in New York. BP has lost 43 percent of its market value since the disaster and has been excoriated by President Barack Obama for repeated failures to cap the leaking well. “A crucifixion of the whole oil industry for the sins of BP in the form of a ban on deep-water drilling isn’t a good idea because look at all the people it’s going to put out of work,” Sabino said. “ Exxon and ConocoPhillips will stress their own safety records to make that case.” Since an April 20 explosion aboard the Deepwater Horizon drilling rig that killed 11 workers, more than 50 million gallons of crude have poured into the Gulf from a BP-owned well, based on calculations from a government panel. Obama Meeting The U.S. government has intensified pressure on BP to stop the spill and pay for damages. Obama has asked to meet June 16 with BP’s chairman, Carl-Henric Svanberg , and other company officials. BP Chief Executive Officer Tony Hayward will appear before the House Energy and Commerce oversight committee the following day. The oil company CEOs have been asked to testify tomorrow about the spill’s effect on U.S. energy policy, Eben Burnham- Snyder, a spokesman for Representative Edward Markey , said June 9. Markey is a Massachusetts Democrat and chairman of the subcommittee holding the hearing. Tillerson, Watson and Mulva probably will press lawmakers to avoid changes in offshore drilling rules that could discourage exploration in U.S. territorial waters without making meaningful contributions to safety, said Gianna Bern , president of Brookshire Advisory & Research Inc. in Flossmoor, Illinois, which advises oil companies on strategy and risk management. Tillerson will urge lawmakers to wait until an investigation has determined the cause of the catastrophe before deciding on changes to offshore drilling rules, Alan Jeffers , a spokesman for the Irving, Texas-based company, said in a telephone interview. Nancy Turner , a spokeswoman for ConocoPhillips, didn’t return phone messages left after regular business hours. Chevron’s media department also didn’t respond to after-hour requests for comment. Valdez Comparison The April 20 pressure surge, or blowout, at BP’s Macondo well about 40 miles (64 kilometers) from the Louisiana coast triggered an oil spill that dwarfs Exxon’s 1989 Valdez tanker disaster in Alaska’s Prince William Sound. Fisherman, oyster farmers and shrimpers have filed lawsuits and claims for lost profits as blobs of crude threaten shorelines from Louisiana to the Florida Panhandle. More than 30 deep-water rigs have been ordered to cease drilling off the coasts of Louisiana and Texas for at least six months while federal officials conduct a review of offshore safety practices. The Gulf accounts for 30 percent of U.S. oil production, according to the Energy Information Administration. The drilling halt may cut oil production in the Gulf by as much as 11 percent next year, said Paul Cheng , a Barclays Capital analyst. ‘Wreak Havoc’ “These executives need to explain to the politicians that if you permanently shut us down in the deep water it’s going to wreak havoc with energy production and put the United States even more at the mercy of foreign oil producers,” Sabino said. Also scheduled to appear before tomorrow’s panel are Lamar McKay and Marvin Odum , the presidents of the U.S. units of BP and Royal Dutch Shell Plc, respectively. Lawmakers may ask Exxon, Chevron, ConocoPhillips and Shell to describe safety measures they have used offshore to avoid the sort of disaster BP faced, said Bern, a former BP crude trader. Exxon, which pumps more crude than every member of OPEC except Saudi Arabia, Iran and Iraq, abandoned an exploration project known as Blackbeard in the Gulf of Mexico in 2007 rather than risk a blowout. The company quit the project, which sought to drill more than six miles beneath the sea floor, after repeated pressure surges indicated the well was unstable. Controlling Macondo BP engineers alerted federal regulators at the Minerals Management Service that they were having difficulty controlling the Macondo well six weeks before the disaster, according to e- mails released by the Energy and Commerce Committee. “I don’t think this would have happened on Exxon’s watch,” Tom Bower , author of “The Squeeze: Oil, Money and Greed in the 21st Century,” said in a June 11 Bloomberg Television interview. “They’d be much more careful and much more conscious of the need to supervise subcontractors.” To contact the reporter on this story: Joe Carroll in Washington at jcarroll8@bloomberg.net .

Read the full article →

America’s Poorest Presidents (PHOTOS)

May 28, 2010

US Presidents are, by nature, risk takers. You have to be to “lead the nation into war, annex millions of square miles of territory, or drop the atomic bomb to end a war,” news site 24/7 Wall St. aptly points out. In some cases, the audacity of past presidents has caused some woeful financial collapses. The following list from 24/7 Wall St., America’s Poorest Presidents , shows past commanders in chief to have been bold investors, businessmen, and plantation owners who, like most risk takers, had their luck run out once or twice. For more on the financial lives of US presidents, check out The Net Worth Of The American Presidents: Washington To Obama . Here’s the list of America’s Poorest Presidents from 24/7 Wall St.: (Slideshow text by Douglas A. McIntyre, Michael B. Sauter and Ashley C. Allen, Editors, 24/7 Wall Street)

Read the full article →

Fed’s `Main Street’ Message to Senators Protected Powers in Financial Bill

May 20, 2010

By Scott Lanman and Craig Torres May 21 (Bloomberg) — Senator John Ensign went into a Capitol Hill meeting with four Federal Reserve bank presidents and emerged to say he was convinced of their “concern for Main Street.” The presidents “argued very vociferously” that a Senate proposal to limit the Fed’s supervisory authority to banks with assets of $50 billion or more would make it “too New York- centric,” the Nevada Republican said after he and other lawmakers attended the May 5 meeting. A week later, Ensign joined 89 senators in voting to let the central bank keep its authority over 5,000 banks. The vote was another victory for the Fed, which months ago faced one of the biggest challenges to its power and independence in its 96- year history as lawmakers responded to public anger over bailouts of Wall Street firms. The amendment Ensign supported was included in the financial regulatory bill the Senate approved yesterday. “The Fed’s authorities seemed to be under serious threat,” said David Nason , a former assistant U.S. Treasury secretary who’s now a managing director at Promontory Financial Group LLC, a Washington-based consulting firm. Instead, the Fed “appears to have regained its footing and now appears to be emerging with at least as much authority and likely more.” The Senate voted 59-39 to approve a sweeping overhaul of Wall Street regulation that would create a consumer protection agency, a mechanism for liquidating large failing financial firms and a council of regulators to monitor companies for threats to the economy. The measure next goes into negotiations designed to reconcile differences with the House bill approved in December. Audits Avoided The Senate bill contains most of what Fed officials sought. In addition to preserving their bank-supervisory powers, it maintains a ban on congressional audits of interest- rate decisions that some lawmakers had sought to strip away. Ensign joined most Republicans in opposing the final legislation, saying in a floor speech that it failed to deal with Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the housing-finance companies seized by the government in 2008, and “does nothing to address real reform.” The outcome puts Fed Chairman Ben S. Bernanke in a stronger position to withdraw record monetary stimulus as the economy recovers from the deepest recession since the 1930s, said Senator Claire McCaskill of Missouri, a state that is home to the Federal Reserve banks of Kansas City and St. Louis. ‘Not as Informed’ “They’ve done a good job of educating without lobbying,” said McCaskill, 56, a first-term Democrat who spoke with Kansas City Fed President Thomas Hoenig and St. Louis’s James Bullard during the debate. “A lot of members of Congress were not as informed as they should have been about what the Federal Reserve is and how it works.” The Fed didn’t get everything it wanted. The bill would make the New York Fed president a political appointee, a move opposed by Hoenig and Bullard, and put the consumer-protection agency inside the central bank without giving it a direct role in running the new bureau. Another change for the Fed: the Senate bill would create a second vice chairman in charge of supervision. Hoenig, a veteran of a 1980s crisis sparked by an Oklahoma bank failure, played a leading role in the Fed victories. The longest-serving regional president, Hoenig, 63, was among the officials who met with Ensign and other lawmakers on May 5. He took two more trips to Washington than planned this year and used extra time on other visits to meet legislators. Letters to Senators He kicked off the presidents’ efforts to keep their authority to supervise banks with a letter to senators in February, persuaded colleagues to speak up and worked with state regulators and community lenders to get the message across: removing the oversight of small banks would harm the Fed’s ability to respond to a financial crisis. “We spoke our mind on the importance of our role in supervision and for the role of the regional reserve banks,” Hoenig said in an interview. “A lot of senators said, ‘I didn’t understand this, this is helpful.’” The Fed suffered a setback on Nov. 10, when Senate Banking Committee Chairman Christopher Dodd , a Connecticut Democrat, introduced a financial-overhaul proposal that included stripping the Fed of all bank oversight. Then the Fed Board’s legislative-affairs chief, Linda Robertson, began to call on the regional Fed bank presidents for help, according to a person familiar with the matter. Enlisting Bankers Robertson asked regional Fed chiefs to enlist directors and local bankers to contact senators who were reluctant to back Bernanke for a second four-year term. The Fed chief was confirmed Jan. 28 in a 70-30 vote, the most opposition since the chamber started confirming the chairman in 1978. Bernanke’s supporters, including New York Democrat Charles Schumer , said the 56-year-old former Princeton University economist helped save the nation from another depression. Opponents such as Alabama Republican Richard Shelby faulted him for failing to curb the lending practices that helped trigger the crisis and for his bailouts of Bear Stearns Cos. and American International Group Inc . At the same time, the fight was on to preserve the Fed’s supervision powers. In a January letter to Dodd and other members of the Senate Banking Committee, Bernanke argued that the Fed needs the authority to effectively conduct monetary policy and provide emergency loans to banks. Bernanke made the same argument in testimony to Congress in February and March. Regional Fed presidents began writing letters and visiting legislators while stepping up their attacks on the Dodd legislation in public comments. Local Knowledge In one-on-one meetings, the presidents stressed their local knowledge, or what Richmond Fed President Jeffrey Lacker calls “retail central banking.” “I can talk about real estate on the North Carolina and South Carolina coasts, and the economy in Danville, Virginia,” Lacker said in an interview. Such anecdotes provided “vivid examples of what our connection with the district really is.” The Fed also enlisted banking associations to send hundreds of bankers to Capitol Hill March 17. Their message: The Fed should keep its power to regulate smaller state-chartered banks to avoid developing a bias toward Wall Street firms. By April, several Republican senators started to show support for the Fed’s stance, including Shelby and Kay Bailey Hutchison of Texas. Hutchison filed an amendment to Dodd’s bill, retaining the Fed’s power to oversee small banks. The amendment was approved in a 90-9 vote. Audit Measure On a separate front, Fed officials wanted to head off the Senate version of the House-passed measure to audit the Fed, saying removing the shield from monetary-policy reviews would open the door to political meddling in interest rates. Senator Bernard Sanders , a Vermont independent and a self-declared socialist, had one-third of his colleagues as co-sponsors for the measure. Sanders demanded transparency on $2 trillion of emergency aid from the Fed, while the Obama administration, along with senators such as Dodd and New Hampshire Republican Judd Gregg , opposed removing the shield. To secure passage, Sanders agreed to rewrite the amendment to provide for only a one-time audit of the Fed’s emergency lending programs. Representative Ron Paul , the Texas Republican who wrote the original House measure, said Sanders “sold out.” The compromise, along with lobbying by Bernanke, won over enough Senators to vote against a separate amendment, offered by Louisiana Republican David Vitter and patterned after the House language. The Fed “gave a little ground,” said Senator Sam Brownback , a Kansas Republican. Senator Bob Corker , a Tennessee Republican, said the Fed “ended up negotiating something that really did create more transparency. And yet it’s the kind of transparency that won’t really undermine their ability to do things in their Open Market Committee.” To contact the reporter on this story: Scott Lanman in Washington at slanman@bloomberg.net ; Craig Torres in Washington at ctorres3@bloomberg.net .

Read the full article →

Gary Shapiro: U.S.-Mexico Trucking Dispute Placing American Jobs at Risk

May 17, 2010

When Mexico’s President Felipe Calderon visits the White House on May 19, I hope President Obama takes time to mend the deteriorating U.S.-Mexico relationship, which recently soured over a trucking dispute. Last year, the Obama Administration responded to union requests that reversed several years of policy and blocked Mexican long-haul trucks from crossing the U.S. border. The Administration’s ruse of truck safety flew in the face of a total lack of evidence and years of peaceful trade. Mexico responded quickly…exercising legal rights under longstanding agreements by slapping high tariffs on $2.4 billion worth of American products. These tariffs hurt many American producers, including farmers and manufacturers. Reopening the U.S. border to Mexican long-haul trucks would lift the excessive tariffs placed on U.S. products. Such action would contribute greatly toward achieving President Obama’s pledge to double exports in the next five years. It would also help save and create some 25,000 U.S. jobs affected by the trading relationship , according to economists Laura M. Baughman and Joseph F. Francois. The only way to provide relief to those sectors affected by the tariffs is to do the right thing–reinstate the cross-border trucking program. Trade between the United States and Mexico totaled $368 billion in 2008, making Mexico our third-largest U.S. trading partner. As I first wrote in Huffington Post a year ago (See “Trucks, Drugs and NAFTA” ) at the start of this trade dispute, difficult economic times call for open markets to American goods. Instead, we have once again bowed to the pressures of big labor and unions who allege that Mexican trucks are not safe on U.S. highways. The union argument is nothing more than thinly veiled protectionism. Our government has a short window of opportunity to end this economically senseless dispute with Mexico. In two days, the presidents of these most powerful nations in the world will meet. They’ll surely focus on national security issues, drug wars and civil society, and it’s a perfect opportunity to also talk trade. I hope that President Obama will put the U.S.-Mexico trucking issue behind us by resolving this job killing, baseless, stand-off; U.S. manufacturers and farmers must pay hundreds of millions in high tariffs and these products cost so much as to be non-competitive. We cannot be taken seriously as a global leader on trade when we don’t even play by the rules we helped establish. Gary Shapiro is the president and CEO of the Consumer Electronics Association, which represents more than 2,000 U.S. technology companies.

Read the full article →

Morgan Stanley Denies Allegations It Misled Mortgage-Derivatives Investors

May 12, 2010

By Takahiko Hyuga and Finbarr Flynn May 12 (Bloomberg) — Morgan Stanley Chief Executive Officer James Gorman said there is “no substance” to any allegations that the U.S. bank misled investors about mortgage derivatives it sold them. Gorman, speaking at a press conference in Tokyo today, made the comment when asked about a Wall Street Journal report that U.S. federal prosecutors are investigating Morgan Stanley transactions in so-called collateralized debt obligations. He added that the firm hasn’t been contacted by the U.S. Justice Department. “We have no reason to believe there is any substance behind any investigation that appeared in the Wall Street Journal article,” Gorman said. Morgan Stanley arranged and sold CDOs backed by home loans , even as its trading desk would sometimes bet that their value would fall, the Journal said, citing traders. The investigation is reviewing whether Morgan Stanley clearly represented its roles, according to the report. The probe, which is at a preliminary stage, marks deepening scrutiny of Wall Street firms by U.S. regulators following the global financial crisis, the Journal said. Rival Goldman Sachs Group Inc. is contesting a fraud lawsuit from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, which alleges the firm misled investors about a mortgage-linked security in 2007. Spokespeople for the Manhattan U.S. Attorney’s office and the SEC declined to comment, the Journal said. ‘Dead Presidents’ The probe stemmed from an ongoing civil-fraud investigation of more than a dozen Wall Street firms’ mortgage bond businesses by the SEC that began in 2009, the newspaper said. The Manhattan U.S. Attorney’s office is now conducting a criminal probe into some of those firms’ activities, it said. The government frequently begins criminal investigations without filing charges, the Journal said. In bringing criminal charges, the government would need to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the firm or its employees misled investors, it said. Two of the transactions being probed were named after U.S. Presidents James Buchanan and Andrew Jackson, and were called the “Dead Presidents” deals by traders, the WSJ said, citing a person familiar with the matter. Morgan Stanley arranged and bet against the deals, and didn’t market them to clients, it said. The firm made money on the two transactions, though it lost $9 billion on mortgage-related investments in 2007, the newspaper said. Morgan Stanley wasn’t among the biggest firms in the CDO market, it said. To contact the reporter on this story: Takahiko Hyuga in Tokyo at thyuga@bloomberg.net

Read the full article →

Morgan Stanley Probed Over Mortgage Derivatives It Bet Against, WSJ Says

May 12, 2010

By Chris Peterson and Chitra Somayaji May 12 (Bloomberg) — Morgan Stanley is being probed by U.S. federal prosecutors over allegations it misled investors about mortgage derivatives, the Wall Street Journal reported, citing people familiar with the matter that it didn’t identify. Investments known as collateralized debt obligations, or CDOs, backed by home loans , were arranged and sold by Morgan Stanley even as its trading desk would sometimes bet that their value would fall, the newspaper said, citing traders. The investigation is reviewing whether Morgan Stanley clearly represented its roles, the WSJ said. The probe, which is at a preliminary stage, marks deepening scrutiny of Wall Street firms by U.S. regulators following the global financial crisis, the Journal said. Rival Goldman Sachs Group Inc. is contesting a fraud lawsuit from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, which alleges the firm misled investors about a mortgage-linked security in 2007. “We have not been contacted by the Justice Department about the transactions being raised by the Wall Street Journal, and we have no knowledge of a Justice Department investigation into these transactions,” Morgan Stanley spokesman Nick Footitt said in an e-mail to Bloomberg News. Spokespeople for the Manhattan U.S. Attorney’s office and the SEC declined to comment, the Journal said. The probe stemmed from an ongoing civil-fraud investigation of more than a dozen Wall Street firms’ mortgage bond businesses by the SEC that began in 2009, the newspaper said. The Manhattan U.S. Attorney’s office is now conducting a criminal probe into some of those firms’ activities, it said. Criminal Investigations The government frequently begins criminal investigations without filing charges, the Journal said. In bringing criminal charges, the government would need to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the firm or its employees misled investors, it said. Two of the transactions being probed were named after U.S. Presidents James Buchanan and Andrew Jackson, and were called the “Dead Presidents” deals by traders, the WSJ said, citing a person familiar with the matter. Morgan Stanley arranged and bet against the deals, and didn’t market them to clients, it said. The firm made money on the two transactions, though it lost $9 billion on mortgage-related investments in 2007, the newspaper said. Morgan Stanley wasn’t among the biggest firms in the CDO market, it said. To contact the reporters on this story: Chris Peterson in London at cpeterson@bloomberg.net ; Chitra Somayaji in Mumbai at csomayaji@bloomberg.net

Read the full article →

Polish-Russian Reconciliation Highlights Kaczynski’s Funeral in Krakow

April 18, 2010

By David McQuaid and Nathaniel Espino April 18 (Bloomberg) — Poland bid farewell to President Lech Kaczynski and his wife in the country’s ancient capital of Krakow as the leaders of the country’s two historic enemies, Germany and Russia, prayed amid calls for reconciliation. Russian President Dmitry Medvedev lit a candle at the service for presidential couple, who died on April 10 when their plane crashed in Smolensk, Russia, on the way to a ceremony in Katyn forest honoring 22,000 Polish officers and officials killed in 1940 by Soviet dictator Josef Stalin ’s secret police. Medvedev and German President Horst Koehler were among 700 foreign guests, Polish government officials and family members gathered at the 14th-century St. Mary’s Basilica on the medieval Market Square, where a Mass led by Cardinal Stanislaw Dziwisz , archbishop of Krakow and the former secretary to Pope John Paul II , opened to the strains of Mozart’s Requiem. “Seventy years ago Katyn divided two nations,” Dziwisz said at the beginning of the Mass, addressing his words directly to the Russian president. “The tragedy eight days ago has released stores of good will in individuals and nations, and the sympathy and support we have received from our Russian brothers revives hope for reconciliation.” Closed Airspace Ash from Iceland’s 5,500-foot Eyjafjallajökull volcano closed airspace over Europe and led U.S. President Barack Obama , German Chancellor Angela Merkel and French President Nicolas Sarkozy to cancel plans to attend. Other delegations struggled to arrive on government planes with clearance to fly at low altitudes, or by helicopter, rail or road. Georgian President Mikheil Saakashvili flew to Rome and Istanbul, then made stops in Bulgaria and Romania before his plane made it to Krakow in the late afternoon, his spokeswoman Manana Manjgaladze said by phone from the capital Tbilisi. During Georgia’s 2008 military conflict with Russia, Kaczynski collected the presidents of Estonia, Lithuania and Ukraine for a joint trip to the country’s capital, Tbilisi, in a show of support. The call for improved ties between Russia and Poland overshadowed disruptions from the volcano. ‘Respect’ “President Medvedev and Prime Minister Vladimir Putin get a lot of respect from us, both for their solidarity and because they acknowledged the Katyn crime. I think Polish-Russian relations may really get better,” said Radoslaw Kruszak, 30, who waited with thousands of others to watch the funeral via a telecast. Medvedev, who is making his first official visit to Poland, met with Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk and parliamentary speaker Bronislaw Komorowski at Wawel Castle before the funeral Mass began, PAP newswire reported. Kaczynski, his wife Maria, and 94 other officials including central bank Governor Slawomir Skrzypek and the top four leaders of Poland’s armed forces were victims of the April 10 crash. The Kaczynskis’ remains were moved at a slow walk after the Mass through the streets of the city’s Old Town on a military caisson followed by the country’s political elite and heads of state. Crowds stood three- and four- deep as the procession passed, clapping or standing in respect. A military band played somber marches and dirges as it moved through Krakow’s ancient cobblestone streets and up the slope of Wawel hill to the Royal Castle and Cathedral, where Cardinal Dziwisz was to lead a funeral ceremony. Church bells tolled throughout the city in tribute. Condolences After the bodies are placed in a sarcophagus of honey- colored onyx imported from Turkey, leaders of foreign delegations will present messages of condolence to the president’s family, including his twin brother Jaroslaw , the leader of Poland’s largest opposition party. People wishing to pay tribute to the fallen president began gathering in Krakow’s Old Town at 6 a.m. City officials estimated Market Square held about 15,000 onlookers, with another 100,000 watching on special television screens set up at the Lagiewniki sanctuary and the 48-hectare Blonia meadow, south and west of the city center. The Berlin Philharmonic played Richard Strauss ’s Metamorphosen, an elegy for central Europe’s destruction in World War II, for the crowds on Market Square. “Even though we’re the same age, for me President Kaczynski was a teacher of patriotism,” said Bozena Nowak, who drove overnight from Szczecin, 700 kilometers away in northwest Poland with her husband, Wieslaw, and son, Robert. “We would have come on foot if we had to,” said Wieslaw, as the family headed for Market Square. Reconciliation Sought At a ceremony yesterday in Warsaw honoring Kaczynski and the crash victims, Tusk, whose ruling Civic Platform party had often clashed with the president and his brother, called for Poles to overcome their political differences in what has been called the country’s greatest disaster in generations. “This is a serious test for all of us,” Tusk told a crowd in Pilsudski Square that police estimated at about 100,000. “Like the passengers on that airplane, we differ by background, political views and age. Our sense of community can only be preserved within us.” Poland must hold an early election by the end of June to fill the empty post of president. Komorowski, who has assumed Kaczynski’s duties and is the ruling party’s candidate for president, said he will set a date on April 21. Poland’s opposition parties and a legal opinion prepared by parliamentary experts give June 20 as the preferred election date. To contact the reporters on this story: David McQuaid in Warsaw dmcquaid1@bloomberg.net ; Nathaniel Espino in Krakow at nespino@bloomberg.net

Read the full article →

Yale Man Makes Presidents Out of Provosts as Jack Welch Made CEOs From GE

April 14, 2010

By Oliver Staley April 14 (Bloomberg) — When the Massachusetts Institute of Technology was searching for a new president in 2004, it skipped past college leaders with long resumes and instead turned to Susan Hockfield , a neurobiologist who had been Yale University’s provost — its No. 2 position — for less than two years. In choosing Hockfield, MIT, whose faculty and alumni have won 73 Nobel Prizes , made one of the safest bets in higher education: It picked a protégé of Richard C. Levin , Yale’s longtime president with a knack for cultivating college leaders. Levin, 63, whose 17 years in office make him the Ivy League’s longest-serving president, is reshaping the leadership of higher education in the U.S. and the U.K. more than any other college president. Just as protégés of retired General Electric Chief Executive Officer Jack Welch have run at least four of the largest U.S. companies, so former Yale provosts groomed by Levin head three of the world’s top 10 universities: MIT, the University of Oxford and University of Cambridge. Former Levin administrators also run Wellesley College, Duke University and Carnegie Mellon University. “Rick sees this as part of his role as president of one of the world’s great universities: the development of great academic leaders,” said Jared Cohon , 62, a former Yale dean who in 1997 became president of Carnegie Mellon in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Levin, an industrial economist who received his Ph.D. from Yale in 1974, said observing how successful companies function taught him to think like a chief executive when it comes to hiring and promoting. Identifying Talent Levin identifies professors with the talent to lead, coaches them in the nuances of university finances and shares decision making, all to prepare them for greater responsibilities, he said. Yale holds annual meetings where the university’s officers talk about the talent in the administration and who else could do their jobs, said Provost Peter Salovey , 52, a psychologist who was formerly dean of the Graduate School of Arts & Sciences and of Yale College. When he chooses provosts, Levin considers if they could one day be president. “Given the choice, why not try to select provosts in whom you see growth potential?” Levin said in an interview in his office in New Haven, Connecticut. “Is the person a potential successor for a higher level job is a criterion in almost every case.” Yale’s Success Yale, the second-richest university in the U.S., after Harvard University in Cambridge, Massachusetts, has thrived since Levin took over in 1993 from Benno Schmidt , a former dean of Columbia Law School in New York who left Yale after six years. Under Levin, Yale has doubled the number of undergraduate applications, and its endowment has increased fivefold to $16.3 billion. During the same period, Harvard has had four presidents, including an interim leader. The Ivy League consists of Yale, Harvard, Columbia and five other private universities in the Northeast U.S. Levin’s approach to management, including his success in overseeing the endowment, makes his protégés sought after by other institutions, said John Isaacson , president of Isaacson, Miller , a Boston-based executive search company that works with universities. “It’s the easiest sale to make in front of a search committee,” Isaacson said. “Levin is a very effective president with a spectacularly successful endowment, one of the great reputations in the country and a centralized management team.” Yale “has become a talent hothouse,” he said. Quality Successors Effective leaders think about succession, said Indra Nooyi , chairwoman and chief executive officer of PepsiCo Inc ., based in Purchase, New York, and a member of the Yale Corporation, the university’s governing body. “The success of a leader is judged by the quality of the successors they have developed,” Nooyi said. “All of us should think about whom we have groomed for our succession.” Yale, like PepsiCo and Fairfield, Connecticut-based General Electric Co. , is an organization with a reputation for developing leaders, Nooyi said. At General Electric, Welch groomed Robert Nardelli , who served as chairman and CEO of Atlanta-based Home Depot Inc .; W. James McNerney , chairman and CEO of Chicago-based Boeing Co. ; David Cote , chairman and CEO of Morris Township, New Jersey- based Honeywell International Inc. ; and Jeffrey Immelt , GE’s current chairman and CEO. Former PepsiCo executives include Michael White , CEO of DirecTV , in El Segundo, California, and Gary Rodkin , CEO of ConAgra Foods Inc. , in Omaha, Nebraska. Sacrificing Liquidity Levin’s protégés became desirable during the years of rapid university endowment growth during the last two decades. Future Yale candidates may not be so sought after, since the model of financial management practiced at Yale, Harvard and other endowment-dependent universities is no longer so attractive after 2008’s financial meltdown, Isaacson said. As a result of a $6.5 billion loss in its endowment in the year ended June 30, Yale is cutting $350 million from its annual budget by postponing $2 billion in construction, eliminating at least 600 jobs and reducing the number of new graduate students. “They have been willing to sacrifice things like liquidity and a certain amount of risk aversion in order to try and go after bigger gains in their endowment and more revenue,” said Brian Rosenberg , president of Macalester College in St. Paul, Minnesota. “The result has been they have lost sight of their mission.” Macalester, which invested more conservatively, lost 13 percent of the value of its holdings, Rosenberg said. Yale’s investments fell 25 percent. ‘Living Example’ Once installed as the heads of universities, the Yale administration alumni borrow from Levin’s model by boosting fundraising, hiring general counsels and bringing investment managers in-house. At MIT, in Cambridge, Massachusetts, Hockfield adopted Yale practices, including hiring a fulltime attorney, rather than relying on outside law firms, she said. She hired Seth Alexander , a Yale investment manager, to run the MIT endowment. Levin is “a living example of how to be a good president,” Hockfield, 59, said. “I talked to him frequently when I was at Yale and I talk to him even now.” Hockfield, who was named president of MIT in 2004, first came to Levin’s attention in February 1998. Levin was searching for a dean of the Graduate School of Arts & Sciences. “It would never have occurred to me that I would be a candidate,” Hockfield said. “I didn’t have the standard set of credentials.” ‘Quite Lukewarm’ She received a call from Levin inviting her to a meeting. A search committee had included her on a roster of candidates for the dean position, she said. “He said ‘I’ve a got a list and I know all the other people on the list but I don’t know you,’” Hockfield said. “I probably came across as quite lukewarm. It was not my career objective.” When Levin is recruiting officers to his administration, he sells camaraderie and the opportunity to work with other talented individuals, he said. “I say, ‘We’ve got a great team, come work with us,’” Levin said. “ ‘It will be fun.’ ” As a novice dean, Hockfield said she received de facto tutorials on how to run a university at weekly lunches about the arts and sciences faculty with Levin, the provost and other deans. The meals were held at Mory’s , a campus club founded in 1849. ‘Huge’ Responsibilities “As a faculty member, I knew very little about how a university works,” Hockfield said. “At the time, it was my sense that great universities were great because they were unchanging. Instead, I learned that they are great because they are actually changing quite rapidly, and that the responsibilities of leadership are huge.” When he installs deans and provosts, Levin said he works closely with them to prepare them for the job. “I’m very hands on,” Levin said. “I don’t micromanage; it’s more like coaching. I like to have people who are very strong. I’m there for advice and counsel.” When Hockfield became provost in January 2003, Yale was facing budget cuts because of a slowing in the growth of its endowment. The university was also dealing with labor unrest from graduate teaching assistants who wanted union recognition. While Hockfield had experience with the graduate-student issues, she was new to managing a budget, Levin said. Training Period “There was a fair amount of training to do,” Levin said. He met with her regularly in his office to go over the details of the budget. She also met with Chief Investment Officer David Swensen and took a course in university administration, he said. “She’s a person who is not embarrassed about what she didn’t know,” Levin said. “It was very refreshing. No pride got in the way of her curiosity and she was a quick study. Within a few months she was a master of it and able to make budget presentations to the corporation.” Soon after Hockfield became dean, she was approached “between weekly and monthly” with inquiries from search committees about jobs at other institutions, she said. “This question is forced on you with a frequency that I actually found unnerving,” she said. Levin said he encourages his provosts “at the right time” to think about becoming presidents, and he offers advice about whether to accept or decline job offers. “Since these are highly confidential searches, it’s not like they could consult a lot of people,” Levin said. “I played counselor and friend to all of them, and help them think through the pros and cons.” Carnegie Mellon Cohon, now of Carnegie Mellon, said Levin “was so genuinely happy for me that it was striking” when Cohon became a finalist for a president’s job. “He was extremely generous with his time about how to be president, giving me tips,” Cohon said. Only in the case of Hockfield, who had been provost for 18 months before taking the MIT position, did Levin say he thought she was leaving too early. “I wish she would have stayed longer,” Levin said. “The opportunity was there to be the first woman president of such a great scientific institution; it was too appealing to resist.” Hockfield said the most important management lesson she learned from Levin was the importance of collaboration. Listening Skills “He gave me three pieces of advice when I became provost: ‘Listen, listen and listen,’” Hockfield said. Listening is the “first rule” of managing, Levin said. “In the academic world in particular, if people feel they’ve been heard — even if you make a decision that’s the opposite of their preference — the decision is usually respected,” Levin said. That is especially true now in an atmosphere of shrunken endowments and budget cutting, said Isaacson, the executive recruiter. “The management side of the model makes every bit as much sense now,” Isaacson said. “Universities are places where persuasion is essential to management. That is a particularly appealing style.” Once at Carnegie Mellon, Cohon followed Yale’s example and expanded the staff of the university’s fundraising department, he said. He also increased Carnegie Mellon’s alumni chapters to 52 from 12 and raised $625 million as part of a $1 billion campaign initiated in 2003, said Teresa Thomas, a spokeswoman. “It’s one of the things that I learned the most about when I was at Yale,” Cohon said. “Watching the Yale fundraising operation in action — it’s first rate.” British Admirers Along with Hockfield, Levin’s provosts who now head other universities are Andrew Hamilton , who was installed in October as vice-chancellor — the equivalent of a president — of the University of Oxford in the U.K.; and Alison Richard , who became vice-chancellor of the University of Cambridge in the U.K. in 2003. Richard is stepping down in October. The overseers of the English institutions admired how effectively Yale operates, said Alan Ryan, a professor of politics at Oxford who writes about higher-education issues for the Times Higher Education Supplement , a U.K periodical. Once at Cambridge, Richard started a 1 billion pound ($1.54 billion) capital campaign, then the biggest ever for a U.K. university, and hired the institution’s first internal investment manager to oversee its endowment. Duke President In the U.S., Richard Brodhead , former dean of Yale College, is president of Duke University in Durham, North Carolina, and Kim Bottomly , a former deputy provost, runs Wellesley College in Wellesley, Massachusetts. The University of Cambridge was ranked second in the 2009 Times Higher Education-QS rankings of world universities. Yale was third, Oxford was tied for fifth with Imperial College London, MIT was ninth and Duke was 14th. Harvard placed first. Levin was first exposed to the challenges of university leadership when a number of Yale department heads served on a committee in 1991 to consider eliminating faculty positions because of Yale’s financial struggles, Brodhead said. Committee members included Levin, then the chairman of the economics department; Brodhead, then chairman of English; Richard, director of Yale’s Peabody Museum, and Judith Rodin , then chairwoman of the psychology department. Rodin later became president of the University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia. “We were all colleagues together,” Brodhead said. “We were a generation of people that had just taken on department leadership positions and going through that process was an immense education about the university.” Administrative Careers The experience helped inspire Levin and the others to pursue careers in administration, Brodhead said. “It gave us a sense of leadership and authority as extremely important and positive roles in a university,” he said. Other institutions besides Yale have a record of producing university presidents. Former Princeton University provosts Amy Gutmann and Neil Rudenstine went on to run Ivy League institutions. Gutmann is president of the University of Pennsylvania, and Rudenstine is a former president of Harvard. Princeton is in Princeton, New Jersey. Executives from the University of Michigan, in Ann Arbor, who have led other schools include Lee Bollinger , president of Columbia University in New York, and Teresa Sullivan, who on Jan. 11 was named president of the University of Virginia in Charlottesville. At Harvard, the provost is a relatively new position, created in 1992, and lacks the influence of the position at Yale, Isaacson said. Salovey, Yale’s provost since 2008, is aware of the expectations that come with his role. He would consider a job offer that made sense, although “Yale is not an easy place to leave,” he said. “An incredible opportunity that is a perfect fit is one to take seriously,” Salovey said. To contact the reporter on this story: Oliver Staley in New York at ostaley@bloomberg.net

Read the full article →

New Sales Associates Join Millennium Trust Company

April 1, 2010

OAK BROOK, IL–(Marketwire – April 1, 2010) –   Millennium Trust Company proudly announces that Jim Anderson, Jeremy Christensen and Jayne Fahlen have joined Millennium Trust. Mr. Anderson and Mr. Christensen, Vice Presidents of Alternative Solutions Group, are responsible for the business development of our alternative assets including: hedge funds, private equity, futures, real estate and precious metals amongst others. Many of these alternative assets can be held in custody accounts, IRAs and HSAs. Ms. Fahlen, Vice President of Automatic Rollovers , will provide leadership in developing relationships with institutional clients to deliver Millennium Trust’s Rollover IRA products.

Read the full article →

PIMCO Hires Gregory Hazlett and Andrew Hoffmann as Senior Vice Presidents and Strategy Heads in Fund of Funds Group

March 22, 2010

NEWPORT BEACH, CA–(Marketwire – March 22, 2010) –  PIMCO, a leading global investment management firm, announced today that it has hired Gregory Hazlett and Andrew Hoffmann as Senior Vice Presidents and Strategy Heads in the firm’s newly established Fund of Funds group. Both of these new positions are based in the firm’s Newport Beach, California office.

Read the full article →

Feldstein Sees Greek Euro-Exit Pressure as Plan Fails

March 17, 2010

By Simon Kennedy March 17 (Bloomberg) — Harvard University Professor Martin Feldstein , who warned almost two decades ago that the euro would prove an “economic liability,” said Greece’s austerity plan will fail and the country may quit the single currency to fix its fiscal crisis. Under pressure from investors and fellow policy makers, Prime Minister George Papandreou ’s government is striving to knock four percentage points off its budget gap this year from 12.7 percent of gross domestic product and has vowed to meet the EU’s 3 percent limit in 2012 for the first time since 2006. “The idea that Greece can go from a 12 percent deficit now to a 3 percent deficit two years from now seems fantasy,” Feldstein, an adviser to U.S. presidents since Ronald Reagan , said in a March 13 interview in Geneva. “The alternatives are to default in some way or to leave, or both.” His diagnosis clashes with that of European Central Bank President Jean-Claude Trichet , who calls Greece’s strategy “convincing” and rejects as “absurd” any speculation it might leave the euro zone. Investors nevertheless aren’t ruling out Feldstein’s analysis. Billionaire George Soros said last month that the euro “may not survive,” and credit default swaps indicate a 22 percent chance Greece will default within five years, up from 16 percent a year ago. Latest Broadside The judgment of Feldstein, 70, a former contender to chair the Federal Reserve, marks his latest broadside against the single currency five years after he said its rules generated a “very strong bias toward large chronic fiscal deficits” and more than a year since he first suggested the 16-nation bloc may splinter. He “has more reason to think he’s right than five years ago, and it’s natural to talk about limitations,” said Philip Lane , an economics professor at Trinity College Dublin. “But the euro area will absolutely not break up.” Greek workers disrupted transportation services and tried to storm parliament on March 5 as lawmakers passed 4.8 billion euros ($6.6 billion) of extra deficit reductions, including lower wages for public employees. Such cutbacks will continue to run into resistance as unemployment is propelled above December’s 10.2 percent and recent declines in the country’s bond yields are tied to cheerleading by European policy makers, Feldstein said. ‘Polite Way’ Greece’s 10-year bond yielded 6.12 percent at 12:25 p.m. in London today, more than a percentage point lower than Jan. 28 . The premium investors demand to hold the bonds over their German equivalents narrowed to 298 basis points from 396 basis points in the same period. Greece will ultimately need to mull alternative ways to tackle its crisis, possibly by finding a “polite way” to default, Feldstein said. That might include persuading investors to swap maturing bonds for longer-term assets at lower interest rates. Another option would be leaving the euro area to devalue and then returning once the fiscal weaknesses are solved. “I don’t know that there’s a good solution to this problem,” Feldstein said. Pulling out and re-entering is impractical and gives other countries an excuse not to restrain deficits and improve their competitiveness within the euro zone, said Charles Wyplosz , a former student of Feldstein’s and director of the International Center for Monetary and Banking Studies in Geneva. While leaving the bloc and devaluing its currency would likely enable Greece to boost exports , the so-called holiday strategy would also require spending cuts, lower real wages and tax increases, Feldstein said. Belt-Tightening “Put all that together, and it doesn’t look like countries are going to eagerly line up to do it,” he said. European governments this week laid the groundwork for a financial lifeline to Greece that would provide emergency loans if needed, breaking a taboo against aid to cash-strapped nations to avert a deeper crisis for the euro. Standard & Poor’s yesterday removed Greece from “creditwatch negative,” lowering the threat of a further credit-rating cut. Greece has a BBB+ rating after S&P downgraded it from A- in December. While a bailout would be a “relatively painless solution,” Feldstein said it would generate opposition among voters and risk other nations demanding similar assistance. Feldstein’s opinions command attention because of his career at the hearts of both academia and politics. This experience catapulted him to the brink of the Fed chairmanship five years ago before President George W. Bush picked Ben S. Bernanke . Counseled Presidents Feldstein received the John Bates Clark Medal in 1977 as the U.S. economist under the age of 40 who made the most significant contribution to economic thought and knowledge, then ran the National Bureau of Economic Research , arbiter of U.S. business cycles, for most of the next 30 years until 2008. He chaired Reagan’s Council of Economic Advisers , counseled Bush’s White House campaign and now sits on President Barack Obama ’s Economic Recovery Advisory Board . Among his former students are Lawrence Summers and Lawrence Lindsey , the current and former directors of the White House’s National Economic Council . “Marty’s a very important economist,” said Glenn Hubbard , dean of Columbia University’s Graduate School of Business in New York, who was also taught by Feldstein and chaired Bush’s Council of Economic Advisers. “He’s a great scholar, but what distinguishes him is that his ideas have practical impact, too.” ‘EMU and War’ As long ago as June 1992, Feldstein wrote in the Economist that “economic analysis” didn’t justify a single European currency. In his most-famous contribution to the debate, he wrote in Foreign Affairs in 1997 that “war within Europe itself would be abhorrent but not impossible” under the euro. Many economists read his comment ahead of the birth of Economic and Monetary Union as a forecast that war would break out. Feldstein denies that, saying an editor wrote the headline — “EMU and War” — and he was arguing that the euro wasn’t a guarantee against such a conflict and might fan cross-border political differences. While Feldstein says he likes Trichet “a lot and I think it’s mutual,” he notes the ECB president often points out that skeptics doubted the euro would exist or last. “You don’t find any of that in my writings,” he said. Even so, Lars Jonung, an adviser to the European Commission in Brussels and co-author of a January paper on how American economists viewed the euro through the 1990s, says Feldstein is a “consistent pessimist, and so far he’s been proved wrong.” Well-Established The currency is well-established and hasn’t sparked political turmoil, trade has increased and inflation differentials in the euro area are similar to those for U.S. states, Jonung said in his Econ Journal Watch study . Greece’s measures and the response of EU governments will eventually strengthen monetary union, he added. Feldstein counters that global growth during the currency’s first decade helped mask its flaws, such as the mismatch of spreading uniform interest and exchange rates over diverse economies that lack fiscal discipline. His criticism doesn’t stop him from predicting the euro will appreciate against the dollar as investors punish the U.S. trade imbalance. The euro has fallen about 4 percent against the U.S. currency this year and traded at $1.38 today. Feldstein turned his attention to the implications of the euro for budgets in 2005, when he said a decision by the euro’s members to ease fiscal curbs left the “way open to much larger sustained deficits.” By November 2008, he was writing that diverging bond yields within the region signaled investors “regard a breakup as a real possibility.” ‘Testing Time’ Two months later, as the euro marked its 10th anniversary, Feldstein told the American Economic Association the currency faced an “important testing time” and countries may ultimately leave it to regain control of their economies. “American economists such as Marty have been proved wrong for a decade and will be proved wrong for the next decade,” said Wyplosz, who predicts that a Greece exit would trigger a “total collapse of the Greek economy.” Feldstein stands by his analysis that it’s not “unthinkable” some countries may choose life outside the euro area. Leaving is “certainly possible, and in part it can happen even if all the economic advice to a government is, ‘You shouldn’t do this,’” he said. “Politicians don’t always listen to their economists.” To contact the reporter on this story: Simon Kennedy in Paris at skennedy4@bloomberg.net

Read the full article →

Fed `Extended Period’ Pledge Faulted as Inflexible by Four Policy Makers

March 10, 2010

By Steve Matthews and Scott Lanman March 10 (Bloomberg) — The Federal Reserve’s pledge to keep interest rates close to zero for an “extended period” has come under criticism from policy makers who say it’s restricting their room to maneuver as the economy recovers. Kansas City Fed President Thomas Hoenig voted against repeating the statement on Jan. 27 because he wanted to keep “the broadest options possible.” Since then, Dallas Fed President Richard Fisher , James Bullard of St. Louis and the Philadelphia Fed’s Charles Plosser have also expressed reservations. The Fed presidents have said the phrase, repeated every meeting since March 2009, might reduce the central bank’s flexibility to raise interest rates or mislead investors into believing the Fed has a specific date in mind. Their doubts increase the chances the language will be tweaked when policy makers next meet on March 16, said New York University economist Mark Gertler . “Some on the committee may be concerned that the ‘extended period’ language creates the perception that the Fed will refrain from raising interest rates well beyond the time that economic conditions begin to justify an increase,” said Gertler, who co-wrote research with Fed Chairman Ben S. Bernanke . Officials may be “getting ready to take the scissors out,” said Chris Rupkey , chief financial economist at Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd. in New York. Evans’ Speech Chicago Fed President Charles Evans omitted the phrase from a speech yesterday in Arlington, Virginia, instead saying rates would stay low for “some time.” He told reporters afterward that the change didn’t signal doubts about the “extended period” phrase. Evans said that to him, the “extended period” phrase means three to four FOMC meetings. The FOMC schedules eight meetings a year. Robert Eisenbeis , former Atlanta Fed research director, said the Fed presidents may not convince the rest of the rate- setting Federal Open Market Committee to alter the wording. Bernanke has signaled the phrase will be retained in next week’s statement by repeating the pledge Feb. 24-25 in semiannual testimony to Congress, Eisenbeis said. “The job market remains quite weak, with the unemployment rate near 10 percent and job openings scarce,” said the 56- year-old Fed chief, a Republican who won Senate approval in January for a second four-year term. ‘Exceptionally Low’ The Fed adopted the wording three months after cutting its benchmark interest rate to a record in December 2008, saying “economic conditions are likely to warrant exceptionally low levels of the federal funds rate for an extended period.” In November, the FOMC added that its commitment depends on when the labor market, inflation and price expectations pick up. The job market has since shown signs of stabilizing. Payroll declines have slowed to an average 27,000 a month from November through February, compared with an average 252,000 from July through October. The U.S. may add as many as 300,000 jobs this month, the most in four years, David Greenlaw , chief fixed-income economist at Morgan Stanley in New York, said in an interview yesterday. The Fed’s preferred price index, which excludes food and energy costs, rose 1.4 percent in January from a year earlier, below the long-run range of 1.7 percent to 2 percent policy makers want for total inflation. “Most indicators suggest that inflation likely will be subdued for some time,” Bernanke said last month. Market Rates Two-year Treasury notes yielded 0.87 percent yesterday, compared with 4.67 percent three years ago. The yield on 10-year Treasuries was 3.7 percent, down from 4.59 percent in March 2007. Bullard, 49, told reporters last week he was “a little less patient” with repeating “extended period,” though he didn’t plan to dissent. He said the phrase may appear to lock in a time frame for action, whereas the FOMC plans to react to economic conditions as they develop. “I would hope we would get the committee to think about some different language that would convey the state-contingency that I would like to convey, and I think most people on the committee would like to convey,” he said March 4 in St. Cloud, Minnesota. Plosser, 61, said Feb. 17 that he had “some sympathy” for Hoenig’s dissent. “That forward guidance has gotten us in a box,” he told reporters in Philadelphia. Fisher, 60, said Feb. 10 in Dallas that “I have never been comfortable with that language.” Voting Members Hoenig and Bullard vote on FOMC decisions this year. The other presidents with a 2010 vote are Cleveland’s Sandra Pianalto and Boston’s Eric Rosengren. New York Fed President William Dudley has a permanent vote, as do the Fed’s Washington- based governors. The debate echoes discussions in 2003 and 2004, when officials cut the benchmark federal funds rate to 1 percent and said low borrowing costs were warranted for a “considerable period.” An informal tally by then-Chairman Alan Greenspan at the August 2003 meeting showed seven of 18 policy makers objected to the phrase. It was jettisoned the following January, when the FOMC said it “can be patient in removing its policy accommodation.” The Fed will provide transcripts of the 2004 meetings in coming months, based on historical release dates. “The longer you use the phrase, the more it hardens and the more drama is associated with changing” it, said Vincent Reinhart , a resident scholar at the American Enterprise Institute in Washington who helped write the FOMC statements as the Fed’s monetary-affairs director from 2001 to 2007. To contact the reporter on this story: Steve Matthews in Atlanta at smatthews@bloomberg.net ; Scott Lanman in Washington at slanman@bloomberg.net .

Read the full article →

Lacker Calls Proposals to Weaken Fed Bank-Supervision Powers `Misguided’

March 1, 2010

By Craig Torres and Joshua Zumbrun March 1 (Bloomberg) — Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond President Jeffrey Lacker said legislative proposals to strip the Fed of bank supervision powers are “misguided,” threatening to weaken the central bank’s ability to lend to financial institutions. “As long as the Federal Reserve is responsible for discount-window lending, it makes no sense to diminish the Fed’s robust role in the supervision of a range of banking institutions, from large to small,” Lacker said today in the text of his remarks to the annual conference of the Institute of International Bankers in Washington. Congress is engaged in the most sweeping overhaul of financial regulation since the 1930s. Under some legislative proposals, Congress may curtail the Fed’s powers to provide emergency liquidity and supervise banks while strengthening its oversight of risk across the financial system. “Proposals to materially alter the Federal Reserve’s supervisory responsibilities strike me as misguided,” Lacker said. The central bank, under a bill passed by the House in December, would be a member of a systemic risk council and have powers to impose higher standards for liquidity, capital and risk management for firms deemed to pose a risk to the financial system. A discussion draft released by the Senate would concentrate bank supervision in a single agency. Lacker focused most of his remarks on the expansion of the federal safety net through government bailouts. Market discipline will be weakened as long as the government has a bias toward intervention to save firms and soften the blow for creditors and shareholders, he said. Strengthen Oversight Bank regulators that strengthen oversight of financial institutions they supervise will increase incentives for firms to engage in regulatory “by-pass” by obtaining funding outside of the banking system, Lacker said. “Money market mutual funds and the tri-party repurchase agreement (repo) market are two modern examples of such ‘regulatory by-pass’ that provide deposit-like liquidity without the regulatory burden associated with bank intermediation,” Lacker said. “Real regulatory reform requires eliminating the inherent ambiguity of the implicit component of the financial safety net,” Lacker said. “This cycle of crisis, rescue and by-pass is destined to recur, and with ever more force, unless we alter what market participants believe will happen when a financial firm becomes distressed,” he said. ‘Market Discipline’ A well-functioning financial system “requires a restoration of market discipline, and that will be impossible without clear boundaries on the federal financial safety net,” Lacker said. The Fed would also be subject to government audits of monetary policy under an amendment to the bill by Representative Ron Paul , a Republican from Texas. Under a Senate proposal, lawmakers would shield the Fed from monetary policy audits while removing its bank supervision powers. “I’m a great advocate of an independent Fed, and I would vehemently oppose the Ron Paul amendment,” Senate Banking Committee Chairman Christopher Dodd said Feb. 26 in an interview for Bloomberg Television’s “Political Capital With Al Hunt.” “Politicizing the Fed, that’s a slippery slope none of us ought to go down,” Dodd said. Dodd, a Connecticut Democrat, also said he wants the Fed to get back to “core functions.” He said he has “difficulty” with the Fed’s bank supervisory role because it may bring with it the “implicit obligation” to keep institutions they regulate from failing. Dodd has proposed consolidating bank supervision in a new agency. Direct Contact Lacker is chairman of the Fed’s Conference of Presidents and with Kansas City Fed President Thomas Hoenig is leading an effort to make direct contact with legislators to make their own case for regulatory reform. The Fed Board maintains a legislative affairs office in Washington, which is its usual channel for contacts with Congress. Hoenig in a Feb. 19 letter to senators said “pinning our hopes on a systemic-risk council and a consolidated super-agency would be a mistake.” St. Louis Fed bank president James Bullard in a Feb. 23 letter to three senators said the central bank was able to deal effectively with the crisis because of the “expertise and information that it acquires as a supervisor of banks.” To contact the reporter on this story: Craig Torres in Washington at ctorres3@bloomberg.net ; Joshua Zumbrun in Washington at jzumbrun@bloomberg.net

Read the full article →

Yanukovych’s Russian Overtures May Signal Ukraine’s Shifting Allegiance

February 18, 2010

By Daryna Krasnolutska and Lyubov Pronina Feb. 18 (Bloomberg) — Ukraine’s President-elect Viktor Yanukovych may be stepping up efforts to move the former Soviet state closer to Russia and end a standoff that’s obstructed gas flows and heightened regional tensions for half a decade. In the 11 days since beating Yulia Timoshenko in a runoff vote, Yanukovych signaled on his Web site he may allow Russia’s Black Sea Fleet to stay in Ukrainian waters. He asked for Russian help to ease gas flows into Europe and yesterday said he wants Ukraine to join Russia’s customs union with Belarus and Kazakhstan, Kommersant reported. Yanukovych’s “policy will steer the country toward a return of good, friendly relations with Russia,” said Sergei Markov , a lawmaker in Prime Minister Vladimir Putin’s United Russia Party. “What we observed before was an artificial attempt to make Russia and Ukraine quarrel.” Yanukovych, 59, who has promised to restore Russian as Ukraine’s second official language, also says he will seek to balance Russian and European Union ties. While he wrote in the Wall St. Journal yesterday that he wants to prepare Ukraine for EU membership “when the time comes,” his actions indicate his ambition to renew relations with Moscow may be stronger than he signaled previously. “Yanukovych is still under the influence of his election win,” said Yuriy Yakymenko , an analyst at the Kiev-based Razumkov Center for Political and Economic Studies. “He pledged to implement all changes that Russia would like to see, ignoring Ukraine’s political context and without thinking whether he really can do it.” New Cold War The defeat of outgoing President Viktor Yushchenko in the Jan. 17 first round ended an era of tense Ukraine-Russian relations that contributed to a souring of ties between Moscow and Washington. Former Presidents George W. Bush and Putin used Yushchenko’s ambition to steer the country into the North Atlantic Treaty Organization as an excuse to ramp up antagonism between the two former Cold War adversaries and prompted fears of a military clash in the region. The Kremlin curbed natural-gas deliveries to Ukraine in 2006 and 2009, withheld a new ambassador to Kiev and accused Yushchenko of supplying arms to Georgia during Russia’s war with its southern neighbor in August 2008. Markets Yushchenko, who defeated Yanukovych in the 2004 Orange Revolution, had targeted NATO membership and joining the European Union as ways of freeing Ukraine from Russian influence. Ukraine’s economic collapse since then, which has left it reliant on a $16.4 billion International Monetary Fund loan, and his bickering with Timoshenko have left voters jaded and contributed to his defeat. Ukraine’s sovereign debt is the third most expensive to insure after Venezuela and Argentina, according to credit default swap spreads. The country’s CDS spread has widened 2 1/2 times since the Orange Revolution, indicating heightened investor perceptions of a default risk, and stood at 975 basis points yesterday, compared with 946 before the Feb. 7 runoff. The hryvnia has lost 42 percent against the dollar since the start of September 2008, making it the second-worst performer of the 175 currencies tracked by Bloomberg in the period, after the Venezuelan bolivar. ‘Strategic Partner’ In yesterday’s Journal article, Yanukovych pledged to rebuild ties with Ukraine’s nuclear-armed neighbor. “We are a nation with a European identity but we have historic cultural and economic ties to Russia as well,” he wrote. “We will rebuild relations with Moscow as a strategic economic partner.” Russia, which traces its statehood to medieval Kiev, shares close economic, linguistic and religious ties to its neighbor. Without Ukraine, Russia stops being an empire with a foothold in Europe, former U.S. national security adviser Zbigniew Brzezinski wrote in his 1997 book “The Grand Chessboard.” Ukraine was incorporated into the USSR in 1922 and it was known as the breadbasket of the Soviet empire because of its agricultural produce. Much of industrialized eastern Ukraine is populated by Russian speakers whose first loyalty was always to Moscow. The Crimean peninsula on the Black Sea, associated with some of Russia’s greatest writers including Chekhov , Bulgakov and Tolstoy, was given to the Ukrainian soviet republic by Russia in 1954. ‘East Is Russian’ Russia’s Black Sea fleet is based in Crimea and 80 percent of Russian gas exports to Europe go through Ukrainian territory. Eastern Ukraine will become part of Russia “in five years,” said Vladimir Zhirinovsky , head of the Liberal- Democratic Party of Russia, on Ekho Moskvy radio. “The east is Russian. The population is largely Russian,” Yanukovych is “basically Russian.” Though Yanukovych has made clear he won’t stick to the NATO membership aspiration, some of his promises to Russia will require significant legislative upheaval to enact. His offer to allow the Black Sea Fleet to stay past 2017 ignores Ukraine’s constitution, which doesn’t allow foreign troops outside the terms of the lease. Yanukovych will need to secure a 300 vote majority in the 450-seat parliament to overturn that law. ‘Change in Policy’ Ukraine’s military strategy stipulates that the country should target NATO entry, though membership would require a referendum. Yanukovych’s request to join the customs union seems not to take into account Ukraine’s membership in the World Trade Organization since May 2008. “Yanukovych’s comments obviously reflect a change in policy,” Yushchenko said at a meeting of his Our Ukraine Party on Feb. 16. Yanukovych has been congratulated on his victory by U.S. President Barack Obama , EU Commission President Jose Barroso and NATO Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen , though Russian President Dmitry Medvedev was first to invite him for an official visit, Interfax reported on Feb. 15. “Russia gains by having a friendlier and even preferential relationship but not a dominant one,” said Chris Weafer , chief strategist at UralSib Financial Corp. in Moscow. “That delivers the Holy Grail for the Kremlin. Good business and good politics: Putin’s dream.” To contact the reporters on this story: Daryna Krasnolutska in Kiev at dkrasnolutsk@bloomberg.net

Read the full article →

Stocks, Commodities Advance on Economic Growth; Dollar, Treasuries Retreat

February 16, 2010

By Nikolaj Gammeltoft and David Merritt Feb. 16 (Bloomberg) — Stocks rose around the world as improved earnings at Barclays Plc and faster-than-estimated growth in New York manufacturing spurred optimism the global economic recovery will be sustained. Commodity prices rallied as the dollar weakened. The Standard & Poor’s 500 Index climbed 1.2 percent at 11:28 a.m. in New York and the MSCI World Index increased 1.3 percent. Copper rose to a three-week high and nickel advanced to the highest price since August, while oil rallied 3.9 percent to above $77 a barrel. Treasury 10-year notes were little changed. Barclays doubled its profit in 2009, providing further evidence that government efforts to underpin the financial industry are working after banks worldwide recorded $1.7 trillion in losses and writedowns. The Federal Reserve Bank of New York’s general economic index showed the fasted growth in manufacturing in four months. The reports overshadowed skepticism that Greece will be able to pull itself out from under the European Union’s largest budget deficit. “Earnings are coming in pretty strong and that’s what moves markets in the end,” said John Carey , a Boston-based money manager at Pioneer Investment Management, which oversees more than $200 billion. “Manufacturing is increasing globally and there will be demand for raw materials, even in the U.S. we’re seeing an increase in manufacturing. People are positioning themselves to take advantage that.” The S&P 500 added to gains from last week’s advance, its first weekly increase in more than a month. U.S. markets were closed yesterday for the Presidents’ Day holiday. The Dollar Index, which tracks the U.S. currency against those of six major trading partners, dropped 0.5 percent to 79.94. Earnings Season Forty-five companies in the benchmark gauge for U.S. stocks are scheduled to release results this week, including Hewlett- Packard Co. and Wal-Mart Stores Inc. More than 350 companies in the S&P 500 have reported fourth-quarter earnings since Jan. 11, and about three-quarters of them have beaten analysts’ estimates, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. Merck & Co. rallied 2.1 percent today after the drugmaker topped analyst estimates, while Kraft Foods Inc. slipped after organic sales climbed less than some analysts projected. The S&P GSCI Index of 24 commodities climbed 3.7 percent, as zinc, silver, lead and gold advanced more than 3 percent. Copper for delivery in three months increased 3.8 percent to $3.221 a pound in New York and nickel jumped 4.1 percent to $20,150 a ton in London. Gold for immediate delivery rallied as much as 1.8 percent to $1,121 an ounce, the highest price since Jan. 19. Metal Bookings Bookings of metals from aluminum to zinc for shipments out of warehouses registered with the London Metal Exchange picked up this year, according to Michael Widmer , metals strategist at Bank of America-Merrill Lynch in London. Nickel has increased 16 percent since the beginning of last week as planned transfers rose to the highest levels since Feb. 12. Europe’s Dow Jones Stoxx 600 Index climbed for the sixth time in seven days, rising 0.8 percent. BHP Billiton led basic- resource shares higher, gaining 3.3 percent in London. The world’s largest mining company was upgraded to “buy” from “hold” at ING Groep NV. Barclays surged 6.9 percent to 294.1 pence in London. The U.K. bank said second-half profit more than doubled as investment banking and the sale of a fund-management unit bolstered results. ‘Positive News’ “Corporate earnings have provided some positive news, which helped to improve sentiment,” said Neil Jones , head of hedge-fund sales at Mizuho Corporate Bank Ltd. in London. “You will need fresh bad news to fuel further risk-aversion trade, which in my view has gone too far lately.” The MSCI Asia Pacific Index rose 0.4 percent. Westpac Banking Corp., Australia’s second-biggest lender, jumped 6.2 percent in Sydney as first-quarter profit climbed. OneSteel Ltd. surged 5.6 percent after the steelmaker said demand is improving. Greek stocks and bonds fell as European finance ministers, meeting in Brussels, prepared to force the country to find more ways to pare its budget deficit. Greek bonds tumbled, with the yield on the benchmark 10- year note rising 19 basis points to 6.44 percent. The ASE Index of stocks fell 1.7 percent, the biggest decline among Europe’s major equity benchmarks. Credit-default swaps on Greek government bonds rose 15.5 basis points to 370, according to CMA DataVision prices, signaling deteriorating perceptions of the country’s creditworthiness. European finance ministers signaled yesterday that Greece may need to step up efforts to cut its deficit rather than rely on a bailout by fellow euro-member nations. ‘Risk of Disappointment’ “The risk of disappointment is high as officials take the view that giving Greece a lifeline until March is the best way forward and imposing sanctions should not be ruled out,” Kenneth Broux , a senior market economist at Lloyds Banking Group Plc in London, wrote in a client note today. “There is no word on a plan B if the efforts to cut public spending are rated unsatisfactory.” Investors turned the most pessimistic on global equities in five months in February, as concerns about European sovereign debt prompted money managers to scale back their outlook for growth and build up cash levels, a BofA Merrill Lynch Global Research survey showed. The Micex Index in Russia, the world’s biggest energy exporter, climbed 3.2 percent, the steepest advance among global benchmark equity indexes. The MSCI Emerging Markets Index of shares in 22 developing nations climbed 0.9 percent to the highest level in almost two weeks. The euro snapped four days of losses against the dollar, rising 0.9 percent, on speculation the declines spurred by Greece’s financial turmoil were exaggerated. The Australian dollar strengthened versus all of its 16 most-traded peers after minutes of the central bank’s Feb. 2 meeting indicated policy makers are more likely to raise interest rates next month if the economy improves. To contact the reporters on this story: Nikolaj Gammeltoft in New York at ngammeltoft@bloomberg.net ; David Merritt in London at dmerritt1@bloomberg.net .

Read the full article →

Companies Pull Most Bond Sales Since 2007 Financial Crisis: Credit Markets

February 15, 2010

By Bryan Keogh Feb. 16 (Bloomberg) — Companies are pulling bond sales at the fastest pace since the credit markets seized up 2 1/2 years ago on concern that the inability of European governments to trim their budget deficits will threaten a global recovery. At least 16 borrowers including Montreal-based airplane maker Bombardier Inc. and Italian betting company Snai SpA have postponed or withdrawn $7.3 billion of debt sales over the past month, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. That’s the most since more than 50 were canceled in the months after financial markets began to freeze in July 2007. The extra yield investors demand to hold high-risk company bonds rather than the safest government debt has jumped almost 1 percentage point since Jan. 11, the biggest increase since March, according to Bank of America Merrill Lynch’s Global High- Yield Index. European finance ministers are meeting in Brussels amid mounting pressure to explain what steps they’ll take to help Greece reduce its swelling fiscal shortfall. “Investors are concerned about Greece and the broader economy much more than they were a couple of months back,” said Jonathan Moore , an analyst at Evolution Securities Ltd. in London. “They understandably want to charge more, and most companies aren’t willing to pay that price.” Spreads, Dubai Spreads on high-yield, or junk, bonds soared 95 basis points since Jan. 11 to 713 yesterday, while the average extra yield on investment-grade debt widened 12 basis points to 171, or 1.71 percentage points, Merrill Lynch index data show. High-yield bonds are ranked below Baa3 by Moody’s Investors Service and BBB- by Standard & Poor’s. Markets in the U.S. were closed for the Presidents Day Holiday yesterday and much of Asia was shut for the Chinese New Year. Elsewhere in credit markets, the cost to protect against a default by emirate Dubai rose to the highest since March on concern that investors will recoup less than anticipated in a $22 billion debt restructuring. Credit-default swaps linked to the Mideast nation’s debt surged 22.5 basis points to 650 yesterday, the highest since March 20, according to CMA DataVision. That means it costs $650,000 a year to insure $10 million of bonds for five years. Dubai and Dubai World, the state-owned company that owes the money, haven’t made an offer to creditors on a plan to restructure the debt, a spokeswoman for the Department of Finance said yesterday. That follows a report by Zawya Dow Jones on Feb. 14 that Dubai World may offer creditors 60 cents on the dollar after seven years to settle the debt. Corporate Bond Risk Credit-default swaps on corporate bonds in Europe also rose, signaling deterioration in investor perceptions of credit quality. Contracts on the Markit iTraxx Crossover Index of 50 European companies with mostly high-yield credit ratings climbed as much as 17 basis points to 511, the highest in two months, JPMorgan Chase & Co. prices show. The Markit iTraxx Financial Index of default swaps tied to 25 banks and insurers increased as much as 1.5 basis points to 104.5, according to JPMorgan. Credit-default swaps pay the buyer face value in exchange for the underlying securities or the cash equivalent should a company or country fail to adhere to its debt agreements. A basis point is 0.01 percentage point and on a credit-default swap contract protecting 10 million euros of debt for five years is equivalent to 1,000 euros a year. LBO Financings Fitch Ratings said that European leveraged buyouts, high- risk deals that were used to finance acquisitions before the credit crisis, face a wave of defaults by 2013 when the bulk of the debt used to finance the takeovers comes due. Debt payments for the companies will surge to an average 48 billion euros ($65 billion) annually between 2013 and 2016, from 6.5 billion euros this year, Fitch said yesterday. Borrowers are increasingly sitting on the sidelines rather than risking selling bonds before the debt crisis affecting Greece and other south European countries is resolved. Sales slowed to $28.1 billion last week, 54 percent below the average over the previous 12 months, Bloomberg data show. “Our sense is that there is a growing backlog of corporate bond issuance awaiting announcement when conditions are steadier,” Charles Stephens , a debt capital markets specialist at Matrix Corporate Capital LLP in London, wrote in a note to clients yesterday. “There’s a heavy refinancing schedule for the corporate sector in the period 2010-12, and the pressure to execute deals will intensify.” Bombardier Pulled Bombardier , the world’s third-largest commercial airplane maker, delayed a $1 billion offering of eight- and 10-year notes after investors demanded a higher yield than the company had anticipated, according to people familiar with the matter. Bombardier marketed the sale from Feb. 8 to Feb. 11, and investors asked the company to pay a yield of about 8 percent to 8.25 percent, said the people, who declined to be identified. Snai , Italy’s second-largest gaming and betting company, pulled a sale of junk bonds citing “market conditions” and a legal dispute with Bridgepoint Capital Ltd. Porcari, Italy-based Snai planned to raise 350 million euros through bonds to repay a 250 million-euro loan, refinance overdrafts and pay for government concessions, according to S&P. Songa Offshore SE , the Norwegian owner of drilling rigs, postponed a $200 million sale of seven-year notes on Feb. 11, according to a person familiar with the transaction, who declined to be identified because the deal is private. The Oslo, Norway-based company may return to the market in March with a larger offer, the person said. ‘Unfavorable Conditions’ Kemet Corp. , the Simpsonville, South Carolina-based maker of capacitors that are used to make electronic circuits, said on Feb. 11 it delayed a $275 million offering “as a result of unfavorable market conditions.” RCS & RDS SA, a Romanian telephone company, postponed a $200 million sale of seven-year bonds Feb. 12, according to a person with knowledge of the transaction. Energy Transfer Equity LP, Regent Seven Seas Cruises UK Ltd, New World Resources NV, ITC^Deltacom Inc., Bank of India and BES Investimento do Brasil have also postponed or canceled planned bond sales this year. “I see issuers waiting on the sidelines, hoping this is temporary, and will come back to the market when the tone improves,” said Kevin Mathews , head of high-yield portfolios at F&C Investments in London. Greek Crisis Credit-default swaps on Greek government bonds have soared to a record on concern the country won’t be able to rein in its deficit, which has grown to almost 13 percent of gross domestic product. Market turmoil has extended to Spain and Portugal, which are also struggling with holes in their budgets. Contracts on Greece fell 5 basis points to 350 yesterday, after rising to an all-time high of 428 on Feb. 4, according to CMA prices. Portugal dropped 2.5 basis points to 192, Italy tightened 2 to 129 and credit swaps on Spain fell 2 basis points to 138, CMA prices show. “If problems in Greece, Portugal and Spain continue, the uncertainty will lead to higher borrowing costs and weigh on sentiment, both of which will affect issuance” in the corporate market, said Vivek Tawadey , head of credit strategy at BNP Paribas in London. Terra Boligkreditt AS, an unrated Norwegian financial company, will start meeting debt investors today for a potential bond issue, according to a banker with knowledge of the matter. Retail Offering Enel SpA is selling Italy’s biggest cross-border issue of company bonds targeted at individual investors. Italy’s largest utility, in which the government owns a 30 percent stake, plans to sell as much as 3 billion euros of debt to savers in France, Germany, Belgium and Luxembourg, as well as to Italians, it said in a filing Feb. 10. Rome-based Enel is rated A2 by Moody’s, its sixth-highest investment-grade ranking, and one level lower at A- by S&P. The company is offering interest of 65 basis points to 125 basis points more than benchmark rates, according to the filing. Vestas Wind Systems A/S , the world’s biggest maker of wind turbines which is unrated and based in Copenhagen, said it may sell bonds for the first time after meeting with fixed-income investors last week. Italian utility Acea SpA hired banks to sell as much as 500 million euros of 10-year bonds. Acea, rated A or five levels above junk by S&P, is planning to meet with investors at the end of this month after the company’s board approves the deal, a banker familiar with the matter said. To contact the reporter on this story: Bryan Keogh in London at bkeogh4@bloomberg.net

Read the full article →

Stocks in Europe Rise on World Economic Outlook; Greece Concern Hurts Euro

February 15, 2010

By David Merritt Feb. 15 (Bloomberg) — Stocks in Europe rose on the outlook for economic growth and earnings, while the euro weakened as officials gathered to discuss how they plan to help Greece tackle the region’s largest deficit. The Dow Jones Stoxx 600 Index increased 0.4 percent, while the euro fell 0.2 percent against the dollar as of 5 p.m. in London. U.S. exchanges are closed today for Presidents’ Day, while Brazil’s markets are shut for Carnival. China, Taiwan, Hong Kong, Singapore, South Korea and Malaysia were closed for the Lunar New Year holiday. Mining companies rallied as Goldman Sachs Group Inc. Chief Economist Jim O’Neill said China’s growth is fast enough that the government may let the yuan strengthen as much as 5 percent to curb inflation. About 72 percent of companies in the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index that have reported quarterly earnings since Jan. 11 have beaten analysts’ forecasts, according to Bloomberg data. Finance ministers of the 16 euro nations face investor pressure to explain measures agreed on last week to aid Greece. “Concerns over sovereign solvency are unlikely to have gone away for good, but there may be some calming of fears in the near term,” David Shairp , the global strategist at JPMorgan Asset Management in London, wrote in a note to clients today. “We anticipate episodic bouts of investor anxiety, as sentiment remains fragile. But for the time being, we stick with our strategy of overweight equities.” Asia Declines The MSCI World Index of 23 developed nations’ stocks rose 0.1 percent. The MSCI Asia Pacific Index fell for the first time in a week on concern Japan’s deflation will persist even after the economy expanded more than forecast in the fourth quarter. In Europe, all but six of the 19 industry groups on the Stoxx 600 advanced, extending the benchmark gauge’s first weekly gain in a month. Renault SA rose 2.4 percent in Paris after Morgan Stanley advised buying the shares. Air Liquide SA, the world’s biggest producer of industrial gases, climbed 1.3 percent after reporting earnings that beat analysts’ estimates. British Airways Plc and Iberia Lineas Aereas de Espana SA rose more than 2 percent after winning U.S. approval for an expanded alliance with AMR Corp.’s American Airlines. Fifty-six percent of companies in the Stoxx 600 that have reported earnings since Jan. 11 have beaten analysts’ estimates for net income, according to Bloomberg data. More than 350 companies in the S&P 500 have posted quarterly earnings in the same period, with companies beating estimates by an average of 12 percent, the data show. Emerging Markets The MSCI Emerging Markets Index rose 0.4 percent as raw- materials companies from Poland to South Africa advanced. Poland’s WIG20 Index climbed 1.9 percent for the steepest gain among benchmark equity gauges in major developing nations. Peru’s IGBVL Index climbed 0.4 percent for the biggest increase among Latin American markets. Mexico’s Bolsa fell 0.2 percent. The Australian dollar rose against all but two of its 16 most-traded peers, strengthening 0.1 percent to 88.89 U.S. cents. The euro weakened against 12 of its 16 most-traded peers as European finance ministers meet today in Brussels. Investors want details of a planned Greek bailout after European leaders last week pledged to support the nation, stopping short of committing public funds. “We do not expect a clarification of how Greece is going to be rescued in an emergency,” Ulrich Leuchtmann , the head of currency strategy at Commerzbank AG in Frankfurt, wrote in an e- mailed note today. “Uncertainty about this issue is therefore likely to continue putting pressure on the euro this week.” Greek bonds declined, with the yield on the 10-year note climbing 7 basis points to 6.2 percent. Economy Minister George Papaconstantinou said his nation is in a “terrible mess.” Dubai Swaps The cost to protect against a default by Dubai rose to the highest level since March as credit-default swaps rose 22.5 basis points to 650 basis points, according to CMA Datavision. Dubai World, the state-owned holding company seeking to restructure $22 billion of debt, may offer creditors 60 cents on the dollar after seven years, Zawya Dow Jones reported Feb. 14, citing unidentified people familiar with the plans. Dubai and Dubai World have not yet made an offer to creditors, a Department of Finance spokeswoman said. Copper for delivery in three months climbed $53, or 0.8 percent, to $6,863 a metric ton on the London Metal Exchange, extending last week’s 8.4 percent jump, the most since July. China is the biggest user of copper and Japan is the fourth- largest, according to estimates by the International Copper Study Group in Lisbon. Cocoa for March delivery climbed 21 pounds, or 0.5 percent, to 2,298 pounds ($3,598) a ton on Liffe in London on speculation exports from Ivory Coast, the world’s biggest grower, may be disrupted after President Laurent Gbagbo dissolved the government. Crude oil fell 0.5 percent to $73.78 a barrel on the New York Mercantile Exchange. To contact the reporter on this story: David Merritt in London on dmerritt1@bloomberg.net .

Read the full article →

Stocks in Europe Rise on Outlook for World Economy as Euro Pares Declines

February 15, 2010

By David Merritt Feb. 15 (Bloomberg) — Stocks in Europe rose on the outlook for economic growth and earnings, while the euro pared declines as officials gathered to discuss how they plan to help Greece tackle the region’s largest deficit. The Dow Jones Stoxx 600 Index increased 0.8 percent at 12:02 p.m. in London. The euro was little changed after weakening as much as 0.4 percent against the dollar. U.S. markets are closed today for Presidents’ Day, while China, Taiwan, Hong Kong, Singapore and Malaysia were shut for the Lunar New Year holiday. Mining companies rallied as Goldman Sachs Group Inc. Chief Economist Jim O’Neill said China’s growth is fast enough that the government may let the yuan strengthen as much as 5 percent to curb inflation. About 72 percent of companies in the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index that have reported quarterly earnings since Jan. 11 have beaten analysts’ forecasts, according to Bloomberg data. Finance ministers of the 16 euro nations face investor pressure to explain measures agreed on last week to aid Greece. “Concerns over sovereign solvency are unlikely to have gone away for good, but there may be some calming of fears in the near term,” David Shairp , the global strategist at JPMorgan Asset Management in London, wrote in a note to clients today. “We anticipate episodic bouts of investor anxiety, as sentiment remains fragile. But for the time being, we stick with our strategy of overweight equities.” Asia Declines The MSCI World Index of 23 developed nations’ stocks rose 0.2 percent. The MSCI Asia Pacific Index fell for the first time in a week on concern Japan’s deflation will persist even after the economy expanded more than forecast in the fourth quarter. In Europe, all but three of the 19 industry groups on the Stoxx 600 advanced, extending the benchmark gauge’s first weekly gain in a month. Renault SA rose 4.4 percent in Paris after Morgan Stanley advised buying the shares. Air Liquide SA, the world’s biggest producer of industrial gases, climbed 1.8 percent after reporting earnings that beat analysts’ estimates. British Airways Plc and Iberia Lineas Aereas de Espana SA rose more than 3 percent after winning U.S. approval for an expanded alliance with AMR Corp.’s American Airlines. Fifty-six percent of companies in the Stoxx 600 that have reported earnings since Jan. 11 have beaten analysts’ estimates for net income, according to Bloomberg data. More than 350 companies in the S&P 500 have posted quarterly earnings in the same period, with companies beating estimates by an average of 12 percent, the data show. Emerging Markets Commodity producers led advances in developing-nation stocks, led by a 1.4 percent jump for Kazakhstan’s KASE Index and 1.2 percent increase in South Africa’s JSE All Shares Index. The MSCI Emerging Markets Index was 0.2 percent higher. The Australian dollar rose against all 16 of its most- traded peers, strengthening 0.2 percent to 88.98 U.S. cents, while the Canadian dollar climbed 0.1 percent to C$1.0494. The euro weakened against 12 of its 16 most-traded peers as European finance ministers prepared to meet in Brussels. Investors want details of a planned Greek bailout after European leaders last week pledged to support the nation, stopping short of committing public funds. “We do not expect a clarification of how Greece is going to be rescued in an emergency,” Ulrich Leuchtmann , the head of currency strategy at Commerzbank AG in Frankfurt, wrote in an e- mailed note today. “Uncertainty about this issue is therefore likely to continue putting pressure on the euro this week.” Greek bonds were little changed, with the yield on the two- year note falling 1 basis point to 5.11 percent. The 10-year yield also slipped 1 basis point at 6.16 percent. Dubai Swaps The cost to protect against a default by Dubai rose to the highest level since March as credit-default swaps rose 22.5 basis points to 650 basis points, according to CMA Datavision. Dubai World, the state-owned holding company seeking to restructure $22 billion of debt, may offer creditors 60 cents on the dollar after seven years, Zawya Dow Jones reported Feb. 14, citing unidentified people familiar with the plans. Dubai and Dubai World have not yet made an offer to creditors, a Department of Finance spokeswoman said. Copper for delivery in three months climbed $70, or 1 percent, to $6,880 a metric ton on the London Metal Exchange, extending last week’s 8.4 percent jump, the most since July. China is the biggest user of copper and Japan is the fourth- largest, according to estimates by the International Copper Study Group in Lisbon. Cocoa for March delivery climbed 25 pounds, or 1.1 percent, to 2,311 pounds ($3,629) a ton on Liffe in London on speculation exports from Ivory Coast, the world’s biggest grower, may be disrupted after President Laurent Gbagbo dissolved the government. Crude oil was little changed at $74.22 a barrel on the New York Mercantile Exchange. To contact the reporter on this story: David Merritt in London on dmerritt1@bloomberg.net .

Read the full article →

Stocks in Europe Rise on Outlook for World Economy as Euro Pares Declines

February 15, 2010

By David Merritt Feb. 15 (Bloomberg) — Stocks in Europe rose on the outlook for economic growth and earnings, while the euro pared declines as officials gathered to discuss how they plan to help Greece tackle the region’s largest deficit. The Dow Jones Stoxx 600 Index increased 0.8 percent at 12:02 p.m. in London. The euro was little changed after weakening as much as 0.4 percent against the dollar. U.S. markets are closed today for Presidents’ Day, while China, Taiwan, Hong Kong, Singapore and Malaysia were shut for the Lunar New Year holiday. Mining companies rallied as Goldman Sachs Group Inc. Chief Economist Jim O’Neill said China’s growth is fast enough that the government may let the yuan strengthen as much as 5 percent to curb inflation. About 72 percent of companies in the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index that have reported quarterly earnings since Jan. 11 have beaten analysts’ forecasts, according to Bloomberg data. Finance ministers of the 16 euro nations face investor pressure to explain measures agreed on last week to aid Greece. “Concerns over sovereign solvency are unlikely to have gone away for good, but there may be some calming of fears in the near term,” David Shairp , the global strategist at JPMorgan Asset Management in London, wrote in a note to clients today. “We anticipate episodic bouts of investor anxiety, as sentiment remains fragile. But for the time being, we stick with our strategy of overweight equities.” Asia Declines The MSCI World Index of 23 developed nations’ stocks rose 0.2 percent. The MSCI Asia Pacific Index fell for the first time in a week on concern Japan’s deflation will persist even after the economy expanded more than forecast in the fourth quarter. In Europe, all but three of the 19 industry groups on the Stoxx 600 advanced, extending the benchmark gauge’s first weekly gain in a month. Renault SA rose 4.4 percent in Paris after Morgan Stanley advised buying the shares. Air Liquide SA, the world’s biggest producer of industrial gases, climbed 1.8 percent after reporting earnings that beat analysts’ estimates. British Airways Plc and Iberia Lineas Aereas de Espana SA rose more than 3 percent after winning U.S. approval for an expanded alliance with AMR Corp.’s American Airlines. Fifty-six percent of companies in the Stoxx 600 that have reported earnings since Jan. 11 have beaten analysts’ estimates for net income, according to Bloomberg data. More than 350 companies in the S&P 500 have posted quarterly earnings in the same period, with companies beating estimates by an average of 12 percent, the data show. Emerging Markets Commodity producers led advances in developing-nation stocks, led by a 1.4 percent jump for Kazakhstan’s KASE Index and 1.2 percent increase in South Africa’s JSE All Shares Index. The MSCI Emerging Markets Index was 0.2 percent higher. The Australian dollar rose against all 16 of its most- traded peers, strengthening 0.2 percent to 88.98 U.S. cents, while the Canadian dollar climbed 0.1 percent to C$1.0494. The euro weakened against 12 of its 16 most-traded peers as European finance ministers prepared to meet in Brussels. Investors want details of a planned Greek bailout after European leaders last week pledged to support the nation, stopping short of committing public funds. “We do not expect a clarification of how Greece is going to be rescued in an emergency,” Ulrich Leuchtmann , the head of currency strategy at Commerzbank AG in Frankfurt, wrote in an e- mailed note today. “Uncertainty about this issue is therefore likely to continue putting pressure on the euro this week.” Greek bonds were little changed, with the yield on the two- year note falling 1 basis point to 5.11 percent. The 10-year yield also slipped 1 basis point at 6.16 percent. Dubai Swaps The cost to protect against a default by Dubai rose to the highest level since March as credit-default swaps rose 22.5 basis points to 650 basis points, according to CMA Datavision. Dubai World, the state-owned holding company seeking to restructure $22 billion of debt, may offer creditors 60 cents on the dollar after seven years, Zawya Dow Jones reported Feb. 14, citing unidentified people familiar with the plans. Dubai and Dubai World have not yet made an offer to creditors, a Department of Finance spokeswoman said. Copper for delivery in three months climbed $70, or 1 percent, to $6,880 a metric ton on the London Metal Exchange, extending last week’s 8.4 percent jump, the most since July. China is the biggest user of copper and Japan is the fourth- largest, according to estimates by the International Copper Study Group in Lisbon. Cocoa for March delivery climbed 25 pounds, or 1.1 percent, to 2,311 pounds ($3,629) a ton on Liffe in London on speculation exports from Ivory Coast, the world’s biggest grower, may be disrupted after President Laurent Gbagbo dissolved the government. Crude oil was little changed at $74.22 a barrel on the New York Mercantile Exchange. To contact the reporter on this story: David Merritt in London on dmerritt1@bloomberg.net .

Read the full article →