probe

Huffington Post…

ALBANY, N.Y. (AP) — A for-profit university operated by real estate mogul Donald Trump is being investigated by the New York Attorney General’s office. A spokesman for the Trump Entrepreneurial Initiative acknowledged receiving an inquiry from Attorney General Eric Schneiderman’s office and said the organization would cooperate with the probe. A person familiar with the situation tells The Associated Press that Schneiderman’s office is looking into claims that the developer and TV host exaggerated Trump University’s success. The person spoke on condition of anonymity because the probe hasn’t yet been made public. The person says Schneiderman is investigating four other for-profit schools in a case looking at deceptive business practices. He’s found more than a dozen credible complaints. Trump announced Monday he would not pursue a presidential bid. The investigation was first reported by The New York Times.

Read the original here:
‘Trump University’ Under Investigation For ‘Deceptive Business Practices’

Find our Weekly Commercial Real Estate, Private Equity and Fund Newsletters at www.WeeklyBrief.net

Huffington Post…

The U.S. Federal Trade Commission is preparing an investigation of Google Inc.’s dominance of the Internet search industry by alerting high-tech companies to gather information for the probe, three people familiar with the matter said.

Continued here:
SOURCES: FTC Prepping Google Antitrust Probe

Find our Weekly Commercial Real Estate, Private Equity and Fund Newsletters at www.WeeklyBrief.net

Video: Cohen Says Wiretaps May Strengthen Insider-Trading Cases

December 17, 2010

Dec. 17 (Bloomberg) — Joel Cohen, a partner at Gibson Dunn & Crutcher LLP, talks about the U.S. probe into insider trading and the evidence used for such cases. Three technology company workers and a man who worked at an expert-networking firm were arrested yesterday as part of the probe. Cohen speaks with Erik Schatzker on Bloomberg Television’s “InsideTrack.” (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Markets Close Lower after FBI’s Insider Trading Probe

November 22, 2010

Markets Close Lower after FBI’s Insider Trading Probe

Read the full article →

Markets Close Lower after FBI’s Insider Trading Probe

November 22, 2010

Markets Close Lower after FBI’s Insider Trading Probe

Read the full article →

Markets Close Lower after FBI’s Insider Trading Probe

November 22, 2010

Markets Close Lower after FBI’s Insider Trading Probe

Read the full article →

SEC Investigating Deal Between JPMorgan And Hedge Fund Magnetar

November 1, 2010

The Securities and Exchange Commission is investigating whether JPMorgan Chase allowed a hedge fund to improperly select assets for a $1.1 billion deal backed by subprime mortgages, according to people familiar with the probe.

Read the full article →

SEC Probe on JPMorgan Chase & Co. Leads Markets Lower

November 1, 2010

SEC Probe on JPMorgan Chase & Co. Leads Markets Lower

Read the full article →

SEC Probe on JPMorgan Chase & Co. Leads Markets Lower

November 1, 2010

SEC Probe on JPMorgan Chase & Co. Leads Markets Lower

Read the full article →

HP Bribery Scandal: U.S. Widens Probe Of Allegations

September 10, 2010

NEW YORK — U.S. investigators have widened their probe of alleged kickbacks paid to Russian authorities by employees of a Hewlett-Packard Co. subsidiary in Germany. Authorities in Russia, Germany and the U.S. have been looking into alleged bribes totaling $11 million paid to secure a $44.5 million contract that ran from 2001 until 2006.

Read the full article →

Video: Issa Questions Timing of SEC’s Goldman Suit, Settlement: Video

July 23, 2010

July 23 (Bloomberg) — U.S. Representative Darrell Issa talks about the timing of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s lawsuit against Goldman Sachs Group Inc. and subsequent $550 million settlement with the firm. SEC Inspector General H. David Kotz, in response to a request from Issa, said he will expand his probe on whether politics prompted the lawsuit to include the agency’s July 15 settlement accord. Issa speaks with Erik Schatzker on Bloomberg Television’s “InsideTrack.” (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Arthur Samberg Pays $28M To Settle Microsoft Insider Trading Charges

May 27, 2010

WASHINGTON — An investment firm and its founder and chairman, Arthur Samberg, have agreed to pay a total of $28 million to settle regulators’ charges of insider trading in Microsoft shares, in a long-running case that prompted scrutiny in Congress and by an agency watchdog. The Securities and Exchange Commission announced the settlement Thursday with Pequot Capital Management Inc., whose core hedge fund was liquidated last year, and with Samberg, a well-known money manager and philanthropist. They neither admitted nor denied wrongdoing in settling the SEC’s civil lawsuit filed in federal court in Connecticut. The SEC alleged that the hedge fund traded shares of Microsoft Corp. on confidential information provided by a former employee of the technology giant whom it later hired. That alleged tipster, David Zilkha, was hired by Pequot in April 2001. The SEC alleges in a new administrative proceeding against him that Zilkha concealed from the agency staff that he had gotten inside information on Microsoft’s earnings and recommended to Samberg that he buy the stock based on the advance information. Zilkha, 41, left Pequot in November 2001. His attorney, Henry Putzel III, didn’t immediately return telephone calls seeking comment Thursday. Pequot Capital and Samberg together are paying $10 million in civil fines and $18 million in restitution of trading profits plus interest. In addition, Samberg is barred under the settlement from working for any investment adviser firm. Samberg, 69, who has been Pequot’s chairman and CEO since founding the firm in 1998, has been winding down Pequot, which was a major investment firm managing about $15 billion in assets at its peak. It had been based in Westport, Conn., but moved its headquarters to Wilton, Conn., in May 2009, when it liquidated its core hedge fund amid the SEC’s insider-trading investigation. Jonathan Gasthalter, a spokesman for Pequot and Samberg, declined to comment. In December 2006, the SEC closed an earlier investigation of Pequot that it had started in late 2004. No enforcement action was taken. The agency reopened the probe in January 2009 after documents emerged in a divorce proceeding in Connecticut that showed that Pequot began paying $2.1 million to Zilkha in mid-2007. As rumors swirled in April 2001 that Microsoft would miss its earnings estimates for the latest quarter, Samberg sought information from Zilkha, who had just accepted Samberg’s offer to work at Pequot, the SEC alleged in its suit. Zilkha then asked a former Microsoft colleague, who told him that the company would meet or exceed the earnings estimates, the agency said. By trading on the information from Zilkha, Pequot and Samberg made more than $14 million for the Pequot funds, the SEC said. “The cases have two particularly troubling aspects – a hedge fund manager trading on illegal insider information, and his tipper source who withheld crucial information about the scheme during an SEC investigation,” SEC Enforcement Director Robert Khuzami said in a statement. “Both are high-priority targets” for the agency’s enforcement division, he said. The Pequot case created a high-profile controversy for the SEC, starting in 2006. Gary Aguirre, a former SEC attorney who worked on the first Pequot investigation and was fired by the agency in 2005, alleged there was interference in the probe by SEC officials and improper deference to a prominent Wall Street figure whom Aguirre wanted to interview. Aguirre’s allegations became public in 2006 and prompted an investigation by Republican staff of the Senate Judiciary and Finance Committees. Sens. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, and Arlen Specter, D-Pa., spoke critically on the Senate floor in 2007 about the SEC’s handling of the Pequot investigation. The SEC has “finally followed the evidence to its logical conclusions after years of unnecessary delays and timidity,” Grassley, the senior Republican on the Senate Finance Committee, said Thursday. “There was clearly a case to be made against Pequot, and the SEC has finally admitted it. Today’s announcement bears out what (Aguirre) argued years ago.” The SEC’s inspector general, David Kotz, found in a 2008 report there were “serious questions” about the impartiality and fairness of the agency’s initial probe of Pequot. An administrative law judge at the SEC declined Kotz’s request for disciplinary action against the agency’s enforcement director at the time and another official over the handling of the probe. The relaunching of the investigation in January 2009 came at a time when the SEC was sustaining intense public and congressional criticism for lapses in its oversight and enforcement efforts. As the scandal involving disgraced money manager Bernard Madoff stunned Wall Street in December 2008, revelations surfaced that staff at the SEC repeatedly failed over the course of a decade to fully investigate credible allegations against him.

Read the full article →

Justice Department Steps Up Antitrust Investigation Of Top Tech Companies

April 10, 2010

WASHINGTON–The Justice Department is stepping up its investigation into hiring practices at some of America’s biggest companies, including Google Inc., Intel Corp., International Business Machines Corp., Apple Inc. and IAC/InterActiveCorp., people familiar with the matter said. The inquiry is focused on whether companies, particularly in the technology sector, have agreed not to recruit each others’ employees in ways that violate antitrust law. Specifically, the probe is looking into whether the companies’ hiring practices are costing skilled computer engineers and other workers opportunities to change jobs for higher pay or better benefits.

Read the full article →

U.K. Regulator’s Probe Is Said to Focus on Front-Running of Block Trades

March 25, 2010

By Caroline Binham and Elisa Martinuzzi March 25 (Bloomberg) — Britain’s financial regulator is examining whether some of the seven people arrested in an insider-trading probe engaged in the front-running of block trades, a person with direct knowledge of the case said. The Financial Services Authority is investigating whether individuals used knowledge of forthcoming securities sales to make a profit, said the person who declined to be identified because the details are private. The FSA this week arrested seven people in connection with the probe, including employees from Deutsche Bank AG , Exane BNP Paribas and Moore Capital Management LLC, which it described as its biggest crackdown on insider trading. Toby Parker, a spokesman for the FSA, declined to comment. “The message is coming out loud and clear that the FSA is extremely serious about insider trading,” said Chizu Nakajima , director of the Centre for Financial Regulation and Crime at Cass Business School in London. “In the past it may have been perceived that insider trading was not a top priority for the FSA. There’s no doubting that it is now.” A block trade is typically a large sale of securities, normally on behalf of a corporate client. Front running is a practice in which a trader takes a position to capitalize on advance knowledge of a transaction that is expected to influence the price of stocks or commodities. Seven Arrested Those questioned by the FSA in the probe include Deutsche Bank’s Martyn Dodgson , Exane’s Clive Roberts , and Moore Capital’s Julian Rifat. Novum Securities Ltd.’s Graeme Shelley and Iraj Parvizi , a director of Aria Capital Ltd., are also being investigated. Ben Anderson was arrested as part of the probe, according to another person familiar with the case. Anderson’s employment details couldn’t be verified. Rifat couldn’t be reached at his home in Oxford or on his mobile telephone. A person at an address in Romford, eastern England listed as Parvizi’s home at Companies House said he didn’t live there. A spokesman at Exane declined to comment. A spokesman for Novum didn’t immediately return calls. Messages left on Dodgson’s mobile phone weren’t returned. Shelley’s mobile phone was switched off. The FSA provided no names or details of the arrested. To contact the reporters on this story: Caroline Binham in London at cbinham@bloomberg.net

Read the full article →

Google Rivals Asked for Statements as FTC Probes Company’s AdMob Purchase

March 10, 2010

By Todd Shields and Dina Bass March 10 (Bloomberg) — U.S. regulators are seeking sworn declarations from Google Inc. competitors and advertisers as part of their probe of the Internet company’s bid to buy AdMob Inc., indicating the government may challenge the deal, said people with direct knowledge of the matter. The Federal Trade Commission is investigating whether Google’s proposed purchase of AdMob would reduce competition in the market for Internet advertising on mobile phones. At least two companies are being asked to sign statements, said the people, who declined to be identified because the probe isn’t being conducted in public. The declarations put on paper information that Google rivals gave the FTC in its investigation of the $750 million purchase of AdMob, announced in November. AdMob sells ads that appear on Web pages and applications on mobile phones. The agency is assessing whether the purchase would let Google parlay its dominance in Internet searches on computers to phones. Agency officials typically collect declarations “when they think there is some significant chance” the agency will ask a court to block a merger, or seek to modify a deal, said Stephen Calkins , a former general counsel at the FTC who is now a professor of law at Wayne State University’s law school in Detroit. Even so, it’s not uncommon for the agency to collect affidavits and then not litigate, he said. FTC Discussions Claudia Bourne-Farrell , an FTC spokeswoman, declined to comment. Google, owner of the most-used Internet search engine, said it is continuing to talk with the FTC and provide information. “We’re not going to discuss the details of that process,” Adam Kovacevich , a spokesman for the Mountain View, California- based company, said in a statement. “We’re confident that they’ll conclude that the rapidly growing mobile advertising space will remain highly competitive after this deal closes.” Google rose $9.94 to $570.13 at 2:02 p.m. New York time in Nasdaq Stock Market trading. The stock had declined 9.6 percent this year before today. Google and AdMob combined would form the largest mobile- advertising company — the companies combined had 21 percent of the U.S. market in 2009, according to Karsten Weide , an analyst with researcher IDC in San Mateo, California. Google said on Dec. 23 that the agency had asked for more information about the transaction. “It’s difficult to envision a scenario where this development, if true, is positive for Google-AdMob,” said Thomas Ensign , counsel in the antitrust, competition and trade practice of Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer LLP in Washington. “But it doesn’t necessarily mean the agency is going to challenge the deal.” Google’s negotiations with the FTC may persuade the agency’s staff that the deal won’t harm competition, Calkins said. When the investigation is concluded, it’s up to the agency’s commissioners to decide whether to challenge the deal in court. To contact the reporters on this story: Todd Shields in Washington at tshields3@bloomberg.net ; Dina Bass in Seattle at dbass2@bloomberg.net

Read the full article →

K1′s Kiener, Salesman Turned Hedge Manager, at Center of $400 Million Loss

October 28, 2009

By Tom Cahill, Josh Fineman and Jann Bettinga Oct. 29 (Bloomberg) — Helmut Kiener went from selling advertising for telephone books and getting paid by the ad to starting a German hedge-fund firm that would eventually make bets using millions borrowed from such banks as Barclays Plc , JPMorgan Chase & Co. and BNP Paribas SA . Police and prosecutors yesterday raided Kiener’s ivy- covered villa near Frankfurt, part of a joint German-U.S. investigation into what may be losses amounting to $400 million, people familiar with the probe said. A woman who identified herself as Kiener’s wife declined to comment when a Bloomberg News reporter rang the door bell last night. Neither Kiener nor anyone at his firm, K1 Group , has been publicly accused of wrongdoing in connection with the probe. The firm claimed returns of 825 percent from 1996 through June this year, according to its Web site, compared with a 49 percent gain for the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index over the same period. Germany’s financial regulator, BaFin, had tried since 2001 to stop K1 from soliciting German investors, according to spokesman Sven Gebauer . “Kiener has been grilled several times before, and he always won,” Karl-Heinz Lipsky, a broker at Fluehli, Switzerland-based Fair Mobil Concept GmbH who has done business with Kiener for almost four years, said in a telephone interview. “Kiener was under fire from BaFin for years.” The Kiener investigation comes as regulators in the U.S. and Europe, urged on by Germany, plan to tighten controls on the $1.4 trillion hedge fund industry. It follows the conviction of New York money manager Bernard Madoff and charges against Texas financier R. Allen Stanford , both accused of moving funds off- shore to obscure multibillion-dollar frauds. Billionaire hedge- fund manager Raj Rajaratnam was charged with insider-trading earlier this month. Stanford and Rajaratnam have both denied wrongdoing. Circular Transactions The inquiry focuses on whether Kiener’s firm engaged in circular transactions with a network of investment firms in the U.K., the U.S. and other countries to create the illusion that K1 had more money available to backstop loans from the banks, said the people familiar with the investigation, who declined to be identified because the probe isn’t public. Prosecutors in Wuerzburg, Germany, are investigating Kiener for fraud and breach of trust, their spokesman, Dietrich Geuder, said in a telephone interview yesterday, declining to provide more details. Kiener wasn’t available to comment yesterday. Daniel Hunter, a spokesman for London-based Barclays, the U.K.’s second-biggest bank, said the bank is cooperating with the investigation. David Wells , a spokesman for New York-based JPMorgan, the second-biggest U.S. bank by assets, declined to comment as did Carine Lauru , a spokeswoman for Paris-based BNP Paribas. Kiener’s Strategy Kiener’s firm had almost $1 billion under management, Army Yan, a K1 executive in Hong Kong, told Hedgeweek , a trade publication, in February. “From our point of view, risk is to be managed, but we do not like to put investors’ money at risk,” Yan was quoted as saying. “Our target is to deliver annual returns of 8 to 12 percent with minimal volatility. We see some managers aggressively taking market risk to increase their performance, which is not in line with our style.” Kiener started K1 in 1995 while still working as an advertising salesman for Frankfurt-based Trias Werbeagentur, where he earned commissions on ads he sold for German telephone books, said Juergen Weismueller, who is in charge of the firm’s workforce. Weismueller, 58, said Kiener was an “average” salesman at the firm, where he worked from 1988 to 2000. ‘Nothing Suspicious’ Kiener, 50, received a psychology degree from Johann Wolfgang Goethe University in Frankfurt in 1987, where his studies included “ statistical chance theory ,” according to K1’s Web site, which was taken down yesterday. “He’s among the few guys who have been here for a while and are a factor in the market,” said Andreas Schuermann, head of risk at Conservative Concept Portfolio Management AG , a hedge fund manager based outside Frankfurt. “It was a known fact in the market that he had trouble financing the leverage he was running in his fund. There was nothing suspicious about that, or anything to suggest something criminal.” Kiener developed what K1’s Web site described as a “semi- automatical allocation system” using statistics to help pick hedge-fund investments. He called his technique the “K1 Fund Allocation System,” a term he trademarked in Germany. “He had a pretty good black box to identify good investment opportunities,” said Michael Smolek , head of advisory firm Nito U.K. Asset Management, which helped find salespeople to market K1 funds. “He was pretty good in picking out good investments.” Regulatory Action From 2001, BaFin and its predecessors tried to stop Kiener and companies associated with him from soliciting German investors. The regulator initially ordered Kiener to stop collecting capital in Germany for a K1 fund company, arguing that it lacked a license. In 2003 and 2004, BaFin issued orders against K1 companies based in Germany and the British Virgin Islands, on the grounds that they lacked proper authorization. The firms challenged the orders in court, and two of them, K1 Global Ltd. and K1 Invest Ltd., had BaFin’s order overturned, according to the regulator. Police took away white boxes loaded with documents from Kiener’s home yesterday. The fund manager, who is married and has two daughters, was described as private and “totally secluded” by neighbors who asked not to be identified by name. His house has a castle-like tower and a Mercedes S600 visible in the garage. ‘Locust’ Invasion Germany doesn’t rank among the top five European nations that are homes for hedge funds, and its politicians have often been openly hostile to the industry, referring to the funds as “locusts.” When Werner Seifert , former chief executive of Deutsche Boerse AG, published a book recounting his experience battling a U.K.-based activist firm, the Children’s Investment Fund Management UK LLP, he entitled his account “The Invasion of the Locusts.” “It’s absolutely embarrassing that this happens in Germany, which has always wanted to be tough on hedge funds,” said Jacob Schmidt , founder of Schmidt Research Partners Ltd., a London-based hedge fund advisory firm. To contact the reporters on this story: Tom Cahill in London at tcahill@bloomberg.net Joshua Fineman in New York at jfineman@bloomberg.net ; Jann Friedrich Bettinga in Frankfurt at jebettinga@bloomberg.net .

Read the full article →

China Opens Probe of Allegations of Subsidies on Chicken Imports From U.S.

September 27, 2009

By Bloomberg News Sept. 27 (Bloomberg) — China has begun an investigation into alleged subsidies on imports of American broiler chicken products, two weeks after the U.S. imposed tariffs on tire shipments from the Asian nation. The probe is a response to a petition from the China Animal Agriculture Association and is expected to be completed in a year, the Ministry of Commerce said today in a statement on its Web site. It comes after Group of 20 leaders meeting in Pittsburgh on Sept. 25 released a statement saying they would “fight protectionism.” China announced that it would look into alleged dumping of U.S. auto and chicken products on Sept. 13, two days after President Barack Obama imposed tariffs on imports of automobile tires from the Asian nation. The U.S.’ move was in response to a so-called safeguard petition filed to protect its manufacturers. “We’ll need to see what China decides to do after the probe to determine if a trade war is to happen,” Dong Shuzhi , head of research at Jinshi Futures Co. said from Shanghai today. “We would say the probe was a response to the tire dispute.” The National Chicken Council, a Washington-based trade group, said Sept. 14 that Chinese poultry-dumping claims were retaliation for U.S. tire import duties. Today’s statement didn’t refer to the tariffs on $1.8 billion of tire imports from China. China is the biggest overseas market for U.S. poultry and purchased nearly 800,000 metric tons valued at $722 million last year, according to the USA Poultry & Egg Export Council. — Li Xiaowei Editors: Mike Millard , James Regan To contact the Bloomberg News staff on this story: Li Xiaowei in Beijing at Xli12@bloomberg.net

Read the full article →