By Alaa Shahine and Jonathan Ferziger March 4 (Bloomberg) — Arab states backed a U.S. proposal for indirect negotiations between Palestinians and Israel, a move that analysts said would let Palestinian leader Mahmoud Abbas sidestep his vow to avoid talks while Israel builds settlements. Arab foreign ministers meeting in Cairo agreed to give the talks four months to succeed and will call an emergency UN Security Council meeting if they fail, Arab League Secretary- General Amre Moussa said in a televised speech yesterday. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu welcomed the Arab League decision to support the talks, his spokesman Mark Regev said. The U.S. said it “appreciated” the Arab League proposal, and announced that American envoy George Mitchell would fly to the Middle East in the next few days to consult with both sides. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton , commenting during a visit to Brazil yesterday, said she hoped the step would lead to the Palestinian state sought by the U.S. “This is a last-ditch attempt,” Moussa said of the new effort for talks. “I repeat: this is a last-ditch attempt.” Ministers approved the proposal even though Israeli policies make it likely that “indirect talks will not yield results,” he said. Israel-Palestinian talks have been frozen since Israel’s military offensive in the Gaza Strip in late 2008. U.S.-led efforts to revive negotiations have foundered on the issue of settlement construction, with the Palestinians demanding a cessation of all building and Israel agreeing to a partial halt. Helps Abbas “The only meaning of this decision is to cover Mahmoud Abbas,” said Moustafa El-Husseini, co-author of a book on the Arab-Israeli conflict called “The Dilemma of an Arab, the Dilemma of a Jew.” “Abbas had said no talks before a freeze on settlement construction, and now he wants to back down.” Mark Heller , a researcher at Tel Aviv University’s Institute for National Security Studies, also expressed skepticism. “I doubt it will produce any substantial breakthrough unless the U.S. is prepared to put a great deal of pressure on both sides,” he said. “This is a way for everybody to revive the appearance of a working peace process.” Getting the two sides talking again by any means is a necessary first step toward any peace accord, U.S. State Department spokesman Philip J. Crowley said. Water, Borders “We want to get these parties talking about the specific issues, not just the final-status issue,” Crowley said. “Until you get into a process it is almost impossible to make progress” on issues including water resources and borders, he said. The final-status issues include the political status of Jerusalem. Mitchell will meet both sides to assess their readiness to talk and work out a framework for the discussions, Crowley said. The mechanics of the indirect talks haven’t been established, and could involve the sides meeting in the same building or city, or in a more complex situation, Crowley said. Israeli and Palestinian positions on marking their common border are much closer than their positions on issues such as Jerusalem, which both sides claim as their capital, and on the right of Palestinian refugees to return to homes in Israel they left in 1948, said Aaron David Miller , a fellow at the Woodrow Wilson Center in Washington. “Proximity talks, or indirect negotiations held together by George Mitchell, are in reality the only way at the moment to go about resuming the peace process,” Miller said. American Role The approach could “provide a way for the parties to talk to one another through Mitchell on issues that could be bridged — territory and borders — and it could legitimize a U.S. role in negotiations over time,” Miller said in an interview. The decision to back indirect talks was taken by a special committee of foreign ministers that includes Egypt, Jordan, Qatar, Syria, Saudi Arabia, Bahrain and Yemen. Abbas said he would accept any decision by the committee. Nabil Abu Rudeineh , a spokesman for Abbas, said in a statement carried by the authority’s official Wafa news agency that the Palestinian leader “looked at the committee’s final statement and found out that it is accepted by both the Palestinian Authority and the Arab countries.” Regev said Israel hoped now “that it will be possible to move forward.” He declined to discuss details about the structure and content of the talks. Partial Freeze The administration of U.S. President Barack Obama has criticized Israel for building settlements and called for their halt to revive peace talks. Clinton praised Netanyahu for agreeing in November to a partial settlement freeze. Arab analysts including El-Husseini say the U.S. wants Arabs to compromise after failing to extract more concessions from Israel. “Netanyahu has swept the floor with Obama,” El-Husseini said. “Obama had upped the ante and couldn’t keep it.” Arab support for the plan wasn’t unanimous. Syrian Foreign Minister Walid Al-Muallem unsuccessfully tried to interrupt Moussa’s speech to express reservations about the agreement. “There was no consensus on the statement,” and the decision to restart talks should have been left to the Palestinians, al-Muallem said later when given the floor. To contact the reporter on this story: Alaa Shahine in Cairo at asalha@bloomberg.net






