raise-money

The Next Big Franchise Opportunity?

by Janean Chun on January 6, 2012

Huffington Post…

Dunkin’ Donuts has kicked off 2012 with big plans for an aggressive expansion — and that includes a range of new opportunities and incentives for potential franchisees. The quick-service coffee and doughnut chain seeks to double its U.S. locations over the next 20 years, providing exponentially more opportunities for franchisees, job seekers and doughnut consumers alike. Currently, the company has about 9,500 locations, 7,000 of which are in the U.S. and predominantly franchisee-operated. Why the big push now? “The opportunity is there,” said Grant Benson, vice president of franchise and market planning for Dunkin’ Brands, the Canton, Mass.-based parent company of Dunkin’ Donuts, noting that the first part of the expansion plan will be in the Southeast and Midwest states, as well as in other regions where the company is already seeing strong growth opportunities, including western Pennsylvania, Texas, Denver, Nebraska and Mississippi. “We will ramp up growth,” he said. “There’s an embracing of our opportunities by existing franchisees looking to grow and add to their networks and by new franchisees seeking business opportunities.” According to Benson, the company’s key criteria for potential franchisees includes previous business experience, primarily restaurant and/or quick-service restaurant experience, and background in building teams and managing P&Ls. To serve as incentive for franchisees in these new markets, Dunkin’ plans to provide fee reductions, such as a “material reduction” in royalties, for the first few years of operation to “help reduce some of the early pressures” of buying a franchise. The availability and specifics of the incentives vary on a market by market basis. As far as helping franchisees get the rest of the capital they need to start, Benson said Dunkin’ doesn’t guarantee financing, but works “very closely with certain national lenders to help bring them together with franchisees.” He added, “The best sources of capital tend to be local sources in the areas franchisees are locating their businesses. We help franchisees make presentations to those banks and get information to the banks to help them understand the company.” Besides adding locations, Dunkin’ plans to add jobs. According to Dunkin’, each new store adds an average of 20 to 25 new full-time and part-time employees. “In some of the smaller or rural communities, the effect will be noticeable if even three or four more stores open,” Benson says. “It doesn’t take a lot of units opening to create a lot of jobs and increase the tax bases in these communities.” While Dunkin’ claims each new store adds an average of 20 to 25 new full-time and part-time jobs, aggressive expansion is often accompanied by potential problems, such as encroachment, in which franchisees’ locations open so closely together, they end up competing with each other. But with Dunkin’s expansion, Benson said he expects “just the opposite. Growth is moving away from markets that are already heavily penetrated. We’re going into markets where there’s a lot of room, and even in markets we have heavily penetrated, we have a good performance of not impacting existing stores.” One of Dunkin’s biggest competitors, Starbucks, with about 11,000 U.S. locations, also expanded aggressively before the recession, doubling its number of company-owned stores from 2005 to 2007 before having to close hundreds of stores and laying off thousands of employees. Benson said he isn’t concerned about the Starbucks precedent. “It gives you reason to learn and be careful. But it’s about taking a look at the proximity and the impact of putting stores too close together, and analyzing and planning that very carefully. We’re not experiencing that [issue] even in markets more heavily penetrated than Starbucks. And we continue to be cognizant of it and to look at each and every site.”

Here is the original post:
The Next Big Franchise Opportunity?

Find our Weekly Commercial Real Estate, Private Equity and Fund Newsletters at www.WeeklyBrief.net

Kardashians Shop Around Newest Idea: Their Own Magazine

by The Huffington Post on January 6, 2012

Huffington Post…

The Kardashians may once again be expanding their empire, and this time in a realm they already seem to rule: tabloid magazines. Rumors are swirling that the reality stars are in talks with American Media Inc. to secure their own magazine. The New York Post’s Page Six reports that a source claimed the family has “been reaching out to several media outlets,” and that the magazine is a “Kardashian idea.” Sources muse that the family, fed up with negative media coverage, wants to feed its own news to the public. There have been no comments from American Media Inc. — the parent company to Star , Shape , Playboy and The National Enquirer — but the anonymous source says the Dash girls plan to be heavily involved in the editorial process. Several media outlets have toyed with the idea, wondering what the final result would look like . According to Page Six , sources suspect that the devoted glossy may be similar to Kim’s celebuzz blog , which posts personal stories and photos about the family and hosts ads for Kardashian-endorsed products.

Continued here:
Kardashians Shop Around Newest Idea: Their Own Magazine

Find our Weekly Commercial Real Estate, Private Equity and Fund Newsletters at www.WeeklyBrief.net

Top Advocate For Entrepreneurs Resigns

January 3, 2012

Carl Schramm, the president and CEO of the Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation , a leading entrepreneurship advocacy group, is stepping down. Schramm, who has led Kauffman since 2002, is departing in order to “return to scholarship and business,” according to a statement released by the non-profit organization on Tuesday. Under Schramm’s leadership, Kauffman saw its research gain prominence and its legislative proposals draw bipartisan support in Washington as lawmakers embraced the group’s increasingly popular credo that the solution to high U.S. unemployment lies in young, “fast-growth” startups . Among other initiatives aimed at alleviating America’s employment woes through entrepreneurship, Schramm spear-headed Startup America , a public-private partnership designed to boost U.S. innovation by encouraging private investment in startups. Schramm was not immediately available for comment. In a statement , he said, “The Kauffman Foundation has researched and practiced entrepreneurship and change over the past ten years. I feel gratified to have played a role in the growth of its influence and the quality of its programs. The Kauffman Foundation’s position as the vanguard of entrepreneurial education is due in large part to its remarkable people. And, as I leave the foundation, it is the day-to-day interaction with those great people that I will most cherish.” Benno Schmidt, a Kauffman trustee and a former president of Yale University, has been appointed the interim president, effective Jan. 1.

Read the full article →

Patrick FitzGerald: You’re Not Steve Jobs — And That’s OK

January 3, 2012

The perfect entrepreneur has no life. He sends emails at all hours of the night, lacks normal social interactions, rarely has time for familial relationships and probably sleeps under his desk. There are no holidays or days off. The company is king and all facets of it dominate his realm on a 24/7 basis. What many entrepreneurs don’t realize is that venture capitalists, angel investors, the media, and the general business community are rarely looking for the isolated autocrat. There are flashes of brilliant obsession of course. One need only look at the comet-like successes of Mark Zuckerberg, Steve Jobs and Bill Gates as examples of uber concentration and unrelenting will. Walter Isaacson’s excellent biography of Jobs lays bare many of the characteristics which made Apple and Pixar the monumental triumphs they are. Jobs’ supreme deliberation and relentless pursuit of a seamless marriage of technology and creativity revolutionized the digital age. Likewise, it is commonly agreed that Facebook began as a reflection of an insular, socially awkward teen looking to expand his social network. Yet, these are not the makings of most entrepreneurs and probably never will be. Granted, most entrepreneurs are a tad off, fairly unique and sometimes just plain crazy. Rational thought plays little part in pursuing an uncharted course rife with massive personal, professional and financial risk. Some would say it’s a calculated risk but it’s loaded with gambling metaphors. Understanding your product, market, competitors, employees and taking out the company trash is an all-consuming lifestyle that leaves little room for much else in life when you’re launching your business. Various studies have borne out that the divorce and substance abuse rates amongst early-stage entrepreneurs is far above the normal level. Simply put, when you’re in charge and the phone rings, you have to answer. It’s very hard to pass on that call to “Bob in Accounting” or claim that you’ve accrued enough vacation time to send out an “Out of Office” email. My kids were all born during the launch/growth phase of various startups I was running so while I didn’t quite answer the phone in the delivery room, I’ve had my share of conference calls while changing a diaper. What most potential entrepreneurs should understand is that while dedication is one thing, obsession is another. Like any dating ritual, potential investors are looking for long-term mates, not obsessive one-night stands. Be sure that this is on their radar when reviewing the management team. Questions about your life outside the company are topical, important and beyond relevant: “Are you dating anyone/are you married?; Do you have any hobbies?; Are you media friendly?; Do you exercise?” If the answers to all the questions are no, you’d better have an unbelievable or life-changing product. Otherwise, most venture capitalists, corporate partners, and even the media will run for the hills. There is no story to be told there, no ambience to embrace. Similarly, the insane hours, overwhelming workload, and fractured structure demand some level of normalcy when assembling the startup team. Personally, I knew it was time to leave one of my earlier startups when conference calls and meetings were repeatedly scheduled for Saturday nights. Sure it makes sense to demand unwavering loyalty, brutal honesty, and rapid fire response time, but it better be fun or it better be interesting or turnover rates and morale will be a constant source of frustration. It’s still early in 2012, but the investment community isn’t investing in robots to launch new businesses just yet. Startup employees and new investors are looking for people they actually like who are insanely passionate about their ideas; not inflexible, uninspiring drones. It makes perfect sense to understand and model some of the business strategies of a Jobs or Zuckerberg, but make a point to create your own entrepreneurial culture. Create it early and create it often; you and your new company will be better off.

Read the full article →

Fred Wilson: The Management Team While Building Product: Keep It Small

January 3, 2012

The first stage of a startup, what I call the Building Product stage is management light. The team should be small. We have portfolio companies like del.icio.us and duck duck go where the Building Product stage was accomplished by one person, the founder of course. That is not typical. What is typical is a team of five or less. The founder/CEO is usually the product manager. There is often a technical co-founder who leads the development team. And there are often several developers (two or three). There can be a designer unless the founder is capable of doing the design. That is about it. There are quite a few of our portfolio companies that had a two person founding team. Both members of the team built the product. Zach Sims and Ryan Bubinski of Codecademy are a good example. As are Daniel Ha and Jason Yan of Disqus . Both of these teams came out of Y Combinator. But two person teams are not limited to Y Combinator. Dennis and Naveen built Foursquare as a two person team. Greg Yardley and Jesse Rohland built Pinch which is now part of Flurry as a two person team. Billy and Yang built and launched Turntable.fm as a two person team. David Karp and Marco Arment built, launched, and ran Tumblr for well over a year as a two person team. I am sure there are other examples in our portfolio of two person founding teams. Three person teams are also common. Etsy was built by Chris, Haim, and Rob. That is in many ways the classic founding team. Rob was CEO and product lead including all design. Chris and Haim were the dev team. They built and launched Etsy in about three months if I rememeber correctly. Hopefully you get the point. Building product is not about having a large team to manage. It is about having a small team with the right people on it. You need product, design, and software engineering skills on the team. And you need to be focused, committed, and driven. Management at this point is all about small team dynamics; everyone on board, working together, and getting stuff done. Strong individual contributors are key in this stage. Management skills are not a requirement. In fact they may even be a hindrance. Next week we will talk about the Building Usage stage where team building and management skills start becoming necessary. This post originally appeared on AVC.com .

Read the full article →

Groupon Seeks Funds 3B Valuation

September 11, 2010

Chicagobased Groupon is looking to raise money through venture capital financing

Read the full article →

Video: Rick Stein `Amazed’ by Sold Out Pop-Up Restaurant

March 26, 2010

March 26 (Bloomberg) — Chef Rick Stein talks with Bloomberg’s Richard Vines about his temporary restaurant in London to raise money for Haiti. Andrea Catherwood also speaks.

Read the full article →

‘France and Germany to help Greece raise money

February 28, 2010

‘France and Germany to help Greece raise money

Read the full article →

YRC Worldwide Nears Key Date On Debt Requirements

October 9, 2009

detail. Analysts said YRC has been using cash at a high rate despite its efforts to pay down debt and raise money through real estate sales, or its efforts to cut costs through employee concessions, layoffs and other means. Wolfe Research analyst Edward

Read the full article →

Video: KKR’s Dollar General To Raise $750M

August 21, 2009

Dollar General raise money an I.P.O’s sale to repay debt. (Bloomberg News)

Read the full article →