results

Huffington Post…

LOWELL, Mass. — A new national poll released Sunday shows neither Wall Street nor Occupy Wall Street conjuring up strong favorable impressions among the American public. But protesters fared better than their wealthy corporate targets in the poll conducted for the University of Massachusetts at Lowell and the Boston Herald. Among 1,005 adults surveyed, 35 percent had a favorable impression of the protest movement that began in New York City and gained support worldwide. Only 16 percent could say the same for Wall Street and large corporations. Twenty-nine percent had a favorable impression of the tea party movement and 21 percent of government in Washington. Knowledge Networks conducted the survey, asking participants their impressions of the four groups. Wall Street and large corporations tied with Washington government in unpopularity, with 71 percent of those polled saying they had an unfavorable impression of big business and Washington. The tea party got a 50 percent unfavorable response and Occupy Wall Street 40 percent. The group surveyed was selected randomly and the poll conducted online from Oct. 28 through Nov. 1. It had a margin of error of 3.8 percentage points, meaning the results could go up or down by that amount. Last month, an Associated Press-GfK poll showed some 37 percent supported the Wall Street protesters. Fifty-eight percent said they were furious about America’s politics, up from 49 percent in January.

Originally posted here:
Americans Favor Protesters Over Wall Street, Washington

Find our Weekly Commercial Real Estate, Private Equity and Fund Newsletters at www.WeeklyBrief.net

menafn.com…

Rum Jungle Resources Limited (ASX:RUM) Announce Ammaroo Phosphate Project Exploration Drilling Results

More here:
Rum Jungle Resources Limited (ASX:RUM) Announce Ammaroo Phosphate Project Exploration Drilling Results

Find our Weekly Commercial Real Estate, Private Equity and Fund Newsletters at www.WeeklyBrief.net

Buccaneer Energy Limited (ASX:BCC) Final Testing Results Exceed Expectations At Kenai Loop #1 Well

June 1, 2011

Buccaneer Energy Limited (ASX:BCC) Final Testing Results Exceed Expectations At Kenai Loop #1 Well

Read the full article →

Mutiny Gold Limited (ASX:MYG) Announce Further Encouraging Drilling Results From Deflector Deposit

June 1, 2011

Mutiny Gold Limited (ASX:MYG) Announce Further Encouraging Drilling Results From Deflector Deposit

Read the full article →

Kimberley Metals Limited (ASX:KBL) Reports High Grade Copper Results And New Targets At Parkers Hill

June 1, 2011

Kimberley Metals Limited (ASX:KBL) Reports High Grade Copper Results And New Targets At Parkers Hill

Read the full article →

USA- Taro Provides 2011 First Quarter Results

May 30, 2011

USA- Taro Provides 2011 First Quarter Results

Read the full article →

Iron Road Limited (ASX:IRD) Announce Stage IV Drilling Programme Results From Central Eyre Iron Project

May 30, 2011

Iron Road Limited (ASX:IRD) Announce Stage IV Drilling Programme Results From Central Eyre Iron Project

Read the full article →

Iron Road Limited (ASX:IRD) Announce Stage IV Drilling Programme Results From Central Eyre Iron Project

May 30, 2011

Iron Road Limited (ASX:IRD) Announce Stage IV Drilling Programme Results From Central Eyre Iron Project

Read the full article →

Tenants Shifting from Retrenchment to ‘Growing Smart’

May 12, 2011

Tenants throughout corporate America are beginning to be less concerned about cost containment within their real estate portfolios and are shifting their focus from retrenchment to “growing smart,” in which they are looking for ways to maximize space utilization and to increase productivity in 2011 and beyond, according to Jones Lang LaSalle as part of the results of its 2011 Corporate Real Estate Survey distributed at the CoreNet Global Summit in…

Read the full article →

Cisco Results…

May 12, 2011

Cisco Results…

Read the full article →

American International Group Q1 Results

May 6, 2011

American International Group Q1 Results

Read the full article →

Boeing Results…

April 27, 2011

Boeing Results…

Read the full article →

Moody’s Results…

April 27, 2011

Moody’s Results…

Read the full article →

Ford Results…

April 26, 2011

Ford Results…

Read the full article →

Small Business Owners Plan To Hire Despite Cash Flow Concerns

April 20, 2011

Yesterday, American Express OPEN released the results of its latest Small Business Monitor, a biannual survey of small business owners. While the report revealed that more small business owners plan to hire over the next six months, it also found that fewer business owners are comfortable with their current cash flow situation. Here’s a graphical look at this trend.

Read the full article →

Drillsearch Energy Limited (ASX:DLS) Canunda-1 Extended Production Testing Produces Encouraging Results

April 20, 2011

Drillsearch Energy Limited (ASX:DLS) Canunda-1 Extended Production Testing Produces Encouraging Results

Read the full article →

Survey: Investor Optimism Rising As CRE Recovery Slowly Gains Traction

March 24, 2011

Investors are growing more confident that the commercial real estate industry is moving past the bottom of the cycle as the economy adds jobs and property fundamentals slowly improve, according to the results of the first-quarter 2011 PwC Real Estate Investor Survey. Tracking the expectations of survey respondents for the future performance of the office, retail, industrial and multifamily property sectors from 2011 to 2014, PricewaterhouseCoopers…

Read the full article →

Investor Survey:Optimism Rising As CRE Recovery Slowly Gains Traction

March 24, 2011

Investors are growing more confident that the commercial real estate industry is moving past the bottom of the cycle as the economy adds jobs and property fundamentals slowly improve, according to the results of the first-quarter 2011 PwC Real Estate Investor Survey. Tracking the expectations of survey respondents for the future performance of the office, retail, industrial and multifamily property sectors from 2011 to 2014, PricewaterhouseCoopers…

Read the full article →

The 10 Companies Young People Want To Work For Most

March 22, 2011

The employer branding firm, Universum, recently asked young professionals for their thoughts on America’s employers including which they’d most like to work for. Some of the workplaces — the Central Intelligence Agency, for one — certainly aren’t for everyone. Universum says that the results could be a reaction to a poor economy. Several companies on the list, including Teach For America (#10), may reflect young Americans’ desire for a reliable and accommodating professional life. The 10,306 people surveyed, who had an average age 27, said that a balance between personal life and work as well as job security are the two highest priorities when it came to choosing an employer. In addition, respondents said that a good reputation opposed to financial strength or ethics was the most important factor concerning a company’s image. Which companies topped the list? Check out the top 10 below and visit Unversum for more information:

Read the full article →

Matt Cohen: Four Market Research Mistakes to Avoid

March 21, 2011

Somebody in my family was recently sent a direct-mail survey from the National Republican Senatorial Committee (NRSC). The survey’s purpose, according to the accompanying letter from NRSC Chairman Senator John Cornyn (R-TX), is to help Republicans in the Senate “fight for the interests and issues that matter to our grassroots base…” That’s a legitimate reason to put a survey in the field, but the questionnaire — like so many others — has a variety of flaws that prevent it from accurately collecting and reflecting the views of the respondents. Whether it’s for political, business, or academic purposes, proper survey design should help market researchers to reveal truths that will enable better decision-making. With that in mind, I’d like to look at some of the flaws in this particular survey with the goal of demonstrating how surveys should actually be constructed. To begin, look at the format of the following questions: Note that the Very important/Somewhat important/Not important answer format doesn’t allow for negative responses. You have to either agree that the prompts represent issues that are important to you (“Very important” and “Somewhat important”) or state that you are indifferent (“Not important”). There is no way for anybody to express that they disagree with a party platform. Suppose you’re a Republican voter who thinks we need amnesty for illegal immigrants. Saying the issue is “Not important” will not accurately reflect your opposition to one of the party platforms. This entire section could have more accurately captured the opinions of the respondents if a five-point Likert scale had been used. For example, the immigration question could have been written as: The Senate should stop passage of amnesty for illegal immigrants. __ Strongly Agree __ Somewhat Agree __ Neither Agree Nor Disagree __ Somewhat Disagree __ Strongly Disagree Of course, this suggestion assumes that the purpose of the survey is to accurately reflect the opinions of Republican voters. There are, however, some questions on the survey that suggest that may not be the case. For example, look at this item from the same section: The prompt is worded to intentionally bias the reader. “ObamaCare” is a weighted term that was coined to make the listener feel negative feelings against health care reform. Here’s the most blatant example of bias being built into the questions: That’s not a question — it’s a lecture. Are the creators of the survey anticipating that anybody will check the “No” box? Here’s an important rule to remember about survey design: never ask a question if the response will not influence your decision-making process. Otherwise, the data you collect will be useless. This survey has many questions where the responses are unlikely to have any impact on how the NRSC behaves either in terms of the legislative agenda or their campaign marketing strategy. So why did they ask that last question? Just as some earlier questions were meant to remind readers about how they should feel about key issues, this final question is meant to act as a pledge . The survey is asking you to confirm your party loyalty. It should come as no surprise that this pledge (disguised as a survey question) is used to segue to the final section of the document: It may look like a survey — but this mailing is really a fundraising effort. Combining market research and fundraising into a single mailing is an ethically questionable practice that violates the trust of the participants. When people choose to complete a survey, they believe that they are helping the researcher and having their voice heard. If the survey turns out to be nothing more than a fundraising campaign, then the participants waste their time and their good intentions. Hypothetically, if this poll really did have the dual purpose of collecting data and raising funds, what effect would the donation or fee requirement have on the results of the survey? The survey’s stated purpose is to take the pulse of all Republicans. The fundraising effort would have the effect of making sure that the sample represents only Republican donors . (There is no check box for completing the survey but not sending money.) This would introduce a selection bias and corrupt the results. If you’re a Democrat, I hope this case study doesn’t make you feel superior: I’m sure there are progressive and liberal organizations that use similar fundraising tactics. If you’re a Republican, I hope you’re able to look past politics to see that the purpose of market research is to collect accurate data that represents your target population, not to persuade people. It doesn’t matter whether a survey is being conducted by political fundraisers or by businesses — the basic standards of responsible market research must remain absolute.

Read the full article →

Baobab Resources plc (LON:BAO) Announce Second Block 1 Cross Section Results At South Zone Magnetite Prospect

March 1, 2011

Baobab Resources plc (LON:BAO) Announce Second Block 1 Cross Section Results At South Zone Magnetite Prospect

Read the full article →

Baobab Resources plc (LON:BAO) Announce Second Block 1 Cross Section Results At South Zone Magnetite Prospect

March 1, 2011

Baobab Resources plc (LON:BAO) Announce Second Block 1 Cross Section Results At South Zone Magnetite Prospect

Read the full article →

Krucible Metals Limited (ASX:KRB) Received Drilling Results From Yttrium Enrichment Zone At Korella Phosphate Deposit

February 28, 2011

Krucible Metals Limited (ASX:KRB) Received Drilling Results From Yttrium Enrichment Zone At Korella Phosphate Deposit

Read the full article →

Pluton Resources Limited (ASX:PLV) Announce Additional High Grade Iron Concentrate/DTR Results From Hardstaff Peninsula

February 27, 2011

Pluton Resources Limited (ASX:PLV) Announce Additional High Grade Iron Concentrate/DTR Results From Hardstaff Peninsula

Read the full article →

Pluton Resources Limited (ASX:PLV) Received Assay Results For The Isthmus Region And Hardstaff Peninsula, Irvine Island

February 17, 2011

Pluton Resources Limited (ASX:PLV) Received Assay Results For The Isthmus Region And Hardstaff Peninsula, Irvine Island

Read the full article →

Pluton Resources Limited (ASX:PLV) Received Assay Results For The Isthmus Region And Hardstaff Peninsula, Irvine Island

February 17, 2011

Pluton Resources Limited (ASX:PLV) Received Assay Results For The Isthmus Region And Hardstaff Peninsula, Irvine Island

Read the full article →

Hasbro Results…

February 7, 2011

Hasbro Results…

Read the full article →

Merck & Co Inc Q4 Results

February 3, 2011

Merck & Co Inc Q4 Results

Read the full article →

Ed Lawler: Evaluating Employees? Add Environmental and Societal Impact to Your Performance Checklist

February 3, 2011

It’s that time again. Most “well-managed” organizations have collected the information they need to appraise the 2010 performance of their employees and either have given — or are about to give — the results to them. In most cases, the companies I have studied measure only the performance of their employees with respect to their impact on the business’ bottom-line: financial performance. Well-managed companies measure both the results achieved and “how” they achieved them. Yet, very few companies have appraisals that go above and beyond — considering employees’ performance as it relates to the environment or society. As a result, employees see their impact on sustainability and social issues as a nice “to do” — not a “must do” — part of their jobs. They don’t have to make tough decisions about trade-offs between profits and environmental impacts and they are not focused on making win/win/win decisions with respect to profit, people and planet. Motivating Performance in 2011 What can be done about this? It’s obviously too late to change how individuals are being appraised based on their 2010 performances, but 2011 is a whole new year. This is exactly the right time to set goals for each employee within your organization that include social and environmental — in addition to goals for financial performance. If this is not done, supporting sustainability will remain a nice “to do,” not a “must do” part of your overall strategy. On the other hand, if these goals are included, there’s a much better chance employees will be motivated to find win/win/win actions. One last point about performance management that’s worth sharing: research at the Center for Effective Organizations on performance appraisal systems show that they often are not very effective at motivating behavior. However, when they include the right approach to goal setting, they do tend to have a positive effect on motivation. Not any kind of goals will do; they need to be specific and progress toward them measurable. Difficulty is also important. If the goals are too difficult, people either don’t try to achieve them or cut corners and cheat in order to reach them, as in the case of Enron. If the goals are too easy, they motivate mediocre performance. But if they are challenging, but achievable — they motivate good performance. Let’s look at the facts. The failure of most organizations to evaluate their employees on social and environmental performance measures is symptomatic of a larger problem. Most organizations, whether they are for-profit or not, fail to implement management approaches and systems that create sustainable effectiveness. They are managed to optimize short-term financial performance, not long-term financial, social and environmental performance. Changing the performance management system is just one step in the right direction, but it’s a necessary and important step. Edward E. Lawler III is co-author of Management Reset: Organizing for Sustainable Effectiveness . A distinguished professor of business at the University of Southern California (USC) Marshall School of Business, he is also the founder and director of the University’s Center for Effective Organizations (CEO), one of the country’s leading management research organizations.

Read the full article →

Burleson Energy Limited (ASX:BUR) Announce Initial Flow Back Results For Two Heintschel Wells

February 1, 2011

Burleson Energy Limited (ASX:BUR) Announce Initial Flow Back Results For Two Heintschel Wells

Read the full article →

Microsoft Earnings Edge Down On Slow PC Sales

January 27, 2011

SEATTLE — Microsoft Corp. said Thursday that its net income for the latest quarter fell slightly from a year ago, and it beat Wall Street’s expectations despite the weak personal computer market. Sales of Office 2010 to consumers and businesses buoyed the results, as did the popularity of Kinect, Microsoft’s new motion-sensing controller for the Xbox 360 video game system. Microsoft’s net income for the October-December quarter was $6.63 billion, compared with $6.66 billion in the same period last year. Thanks to stock buybacks, its net income rose to 77 cents per share, from 74 cents. Analysts surveyed by FactSet were expecting net income of 69 cents per share for the fiscal second quarter. Much of Microsoft’s business depends on selling copies of the Windows operating system and Office desktop software, products that usually rise and fall with fluctuations in the personal computer market. Microsoft launched Windows 7 in the same quarter of 2009, making for a tough comparison. Revenue plunged 30 percent in the Windows division to $5.1 billion. Worldwide personal computer shipments only grew about 3 percent in the latest quarter, as Apple Inc.’s iPad and the promise of more tablet devices to come made consumers think twice about what kind of device to buy. However, the division that sells Office software and other programs saw revenue rise 24 percent to $6 billion. Big companies that put off buying new technology during the worst of the recession are more willing now to upgrade their systems. Microsoft said the division’s revenue from businesses rose 18 percent while revenue from consumers jumped 49 percent, both because of sales of Office 2010. Strength in the entertainment and devices division, which is responsible for Xbox 360, also helped make up for weak Windows sales. Microsoft says it sold 8 million Kinect controllers, helping push revenue for the segment up 55 percent to $3.7 billion. In all, Microsoft’s revenue edged up 5 percent to $20 billion, topping analysts’ expectations for $19.2 billion in revenue. The software maker rushed out its earnings report a few minutes early, just before the markets closed for the day. Shares spiked to more than $29 per share in heavy trading about 15 minutes before the closing bell, before dropping back to $28.87, a 9 cent gain for the day. They slipped 16 cents to $28.71 in extended trading. “A preproduction draft of our earnings release was discovered by one or more media sources who then published our results to the Web before market close,” Bill Koefoed, Microsoft’s general manager of investor relations, said in a statement. Microsoft posted its official numbers after consulting with the Nasdaq stock market, he said. The company is reviewing its procedures to avoid a repeat of the earnings leak. This has happened before to other companies, including The Walt Disney Co. last year. A reporter accessed the quarterly report by guessing the Web address Disney would use before the information was made public, based on the pattern used in past quarters. Microsoft did not immediately say whether the media used a similar tactic to obtain the early results. Despite a successful holiday season for Kinect, Microsoft still needs to prove it is heading in the right direction in areas where it currently lags behind market leaders. Thursday’s report included a wider loss in the online division, which is mostly made up of online advertising. Google Inc., which makes almost all of its money from online advertising, saw its earnings in the same period rise 29 percent to $2.5 billion. Devices running a new smart phone system, Windows Phone 7, went on sale during the quarter, but in its quarterly filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission, Microsoft did not mention its contribution to the entertainment and devices division, which also houses Xbox.

Read the full article →

P&G Results…

January 27, 2011

P&G Results…

Read the full article →

E*Trade Results…

January 27, 2011

E*Trade Results…

Read the full article →

Caterpillar Results…

January 27, 2011

Caterpillar Results…

Read the full article →

Jeffrey Hollender: Five Things Business Leaders Must Do in 2011

January 26, 2011

As 2010 came to a close, StrategyOne, an Edelman public relations company, released the results of a survey on the public attitudes toward American business. The results were pretty ugly, but hardly surprising: Six in ten respondents said corporate America didn’t meet expectations in 2010; seven in ten have higher expectations for 2011. When asked to grade how well corporate America did in 2010, 82 percent assigned a grade of ‘C’ or lower, and 40 percent assigned a grade of ‘D’ or ‘F.’ Eighty-eight percent of consumers found that corporations had recovered from the recession better than American families, and 85 percent thought corporations had better prospects for the coming year. Only 17 percent of those surveyed thought companies deserved an ‘A’ or ‘B’ for honest and moral conduct in 2010. Surprised? No one who occupies a corner office today should wonder why Americans hold such a low opinion of them and their colleagues. Consider these facts — eight reasons why we’ve entered very dangerous territory. According to the commerce department, profits at American companies grew to an annual rate of1.659 trillion in the third quarter of 2010 — the highest they’ve been since the government began keeping track more than 60 years ago. Just 1 percent of Americans own 90 percent of the nation’s wealth. For the richest among us, annual income soared from 4 million in 1974 to an average of 35 million in 2007. Tax rates on executive pay have been cut in half since 1970. From 1985 to 2004, taxes on the top 0.1 percent fell from 42 percent to 34 percent. Meanwhile… The U.S. housing market is down around 25 percent from its peak in 2006. In many markets, the drop is even worse. The average price of homes in Southern California, for example, has plummeted 41 percent. The broader and more meaningful U-6 measure of unemployment, which includes people who have stopped looking for work or who can’t find full-time jobs, is currently around 17 percent. The unemployment rate for native-born African-Americans with less than a high school education is 28.8 percent. Their U-6 measure is a catastrophic 42.2 percent. One out of every seven Americans now rely on food stamps. While most consumers could not cite these statistics, they are nonetheless experiencing their very real impacts each day. They’re also unwittingly suffering from our economic system’s lack of full-cost accounting, which has made it perfectly acceptable for companies to “externalize” their negative social and environmental impacts and shift the burdens of these impacts, financial and otherwise, to society at large. The result is the de facto public subsidization of harmful practices and products, a world where “bad” stuff is cheap (think coal, candy and genetically-modified corn) and “good” stuff is comparatively expensive (think organic food, hybrid cars, and higher education). Put it all together and you get the biggest challenge we face as a nation today — a dangerously negative trajectory pulling us ever closer to the point of no return. Twenty three years ago, I founded Seventh Generation with the idea of creating a different way of doing business, and I’ve spent over two decades building the company into one that many consider a model of meaningful systemic corporate responsibility. During my tenure, I saw business make an incredible amount of progress. Milton Friedman’s thesis that the only responsibility of business is to increase shareholder value has been rejected in boardrooms across the country. Today, an increasing number of businesses are committed to taking responsibility for all of their stakeholders, even if their results fall well short of expectations. While many of you know that I am no longer executive chairman of Seventh Generation, my work in corporate responsibility from inside a company has given me a rare perspective on this evolution,. The fact remains that all businesses will need to become radically more sustainable, transparent and responsible to succeed and survive in the twenty-first century. It’s no longer simply “nice to do”; it’s become a business imperative. So, what do we do about our current mess? As we know from Americans’ attitudes about business and the state of our economy, big changes are needed. The time for incremental improvements has passed, and if business leaders don’t step up and make some major changes, they will risk an increasingly more aggressive and violent public response. To reverse course and avoid these outcomes, here are five things business leaders must do in 2011: Insist on a national economic strategy (as the Chinese have) that makes tough choices about America’s future. We need to regain our lead in alternative energy, rebuild a modest manufacturing base, diversify our agriculture, and spend much less on defense and much more on education, infrastructure and public transportation Embrace transparency. There’s nowhere left for business to hide anyway. Tomorrow’s most successful brands will be authentic because they are transparent and able to build loyalty that advertising can’t buy. Realize that corporate responsibility and sustainability aren’t departments. They’re business strategies, and only strategies that are holistic and systemic will work. The age of doing good with the left hand while screwing people and the environment with the right hand is over. Show a little self-restraint. Greed isn’t good anymore. Senior management compensation is out of control, and political influence by business is killing our democracy. Start doing the right thing because it’s the right thing, not because your lawyer told you to do it. It’s a simple matter of survival–wiping out what remains of the middle class will leave no one to buy your stuff! Create ownership not employment and high wage green jobs not low-wage service sector positions. Together, these steps form a reasonable and effective way to begin promoting the politics and policies of a just and sustainable world. This is the task that I believe to be the most important and profound challenge in today’s society, and the time for us to get to it is quickly running out.

Read the full article →

Yahoo Results…

January 26, 2011

Yahoo Results…

Read the full article →

Gilead Results…

January 26, 2011

Gilead Results…

Read the full article →

3M Results…

January 25, 2011

3M Results…

Read the full article →

Keycorp Results…

January 25, 2011

Keycorp Results…

Read the full article →

McDonald’s Results…

January 24, 2011

McDonald’s Results…

Read the full article →

Halliburton Results…

January 24, 2011

Halliburton Results…

Read the full article →

GE 4Q Results…

January 21, 2011

GE 4Q Results…

Read the full article →

Bank of America 4Q Results…

January 21, 2011

Bank of America 4Q Results…

Read the full article →

Iron Road Limited (ASX:IRD) Processed Murphy South ‘Discovery Traverse’ Results For Central Eyre Iron Project

January 10, 2011

Iron Road Limited (ASX:IRD) Processed Murphy South ‘Discovery Traverse’ Results For Central Eyre Iron Project

Read the full article →

Deep Yellow Limited (ASX:DYL) Receives Positive Interim Pre-Feasibility Results For Omahola Project In Namibia

January 9, 2011

Deep Yellow Limited (ASX:DYL) Receives Positive Interim Pre-Feasibility Results For Omahola Project In Namibia

Read the full article →

Americans Reject Credit Cards This Holiday Season

December 20, 2010

More Americans are choosing paper over plastic — for their method of payment, at least. In yet another sign that consumers are wary to use credit cards, more than half of American adults are not using credit to do holiday shopping, according to a recently released poll. The poll, conducted by Marist Poll at Marist College , found further that only 9% of consumers are charging all of their purchases, with another 9% charging most of them. Unsurprisingly, the results of the poll also found a divide spending habits along income lines, with 66% of those earning less under $50,000 foregoing credit. Among those who earn more than $50,000 47% said they were foregoing credit this holiday season. This credit card caution is unsurprising considering that over 13 million Americans are still paying off credit card debt incurred in 2009′s holiday season. The cutback in credit was reiterated in the results of a Consumer Reports survey , which also reported a drop in holiday spending to an average of $679, down $20 from last year. Other sources have reported increases in holiday spending , including the National Retail Federation (NRF), which expects 3.3% growth this November and December from last year. Kathy Grannis, a spokesperson for the NRF, noted that despite the projected increase in spending, people were turning instead to debit cards to shop, in lieu of charging to credit. “Based on what we’ve seen in our surveys, stores indicate people are cutting back on credit card usage,” she said. Credit card debt has fallen steadily for the last 26 months, according to the Federal Reserve Consumer Credit Report , a signal perhaps that this year’s shoppers will avoid last year’s holiday spending hangover. “This year, we are hearing that consumers are saving up for the gifts that they’re buying,” Grannis said.

Read the full article →

Bing Upgrades Search With A Hand From Facebook

December 16, 2010

SAN FRANCISCO — Microsoft Corp. is hoping its Bing search engine can gain more ground on Google with a little more help from Facebook and its other Internet friends. As part of an extensive upgrade announced Wednesday, Bing will feature more recommendations and other information from people’s social circles on Facebook to help distinguish its results from Google’s. Bing also is teaming up with several other Internet companies to make it easier to complete a variety of tasks, such as buying tickets to a sporting event or making reservations at a restaurant, on its site. The changes, which will start appearing during the next few weeks, are unlikely to shift the balance of power in the lucrative search market any time soon. Google Inc. ended November with a 66 percent share of the U.S. search market while Bing remained a distant third at just under 12 percent, according to the research firm comScore Inc. Bing recently started to power Yahoo’s U.S. search engine, whose 16 percent share ranks second to Google. Despite the huge gap, Microsoft has been encouraged by the progress it has made since it retooled its search engine and rebranded it as Bing in June 2009. Bing has about 90 million regular users now, up from 27 million when it made its debut, according to Satya Nadella, a senior vice president in Microsoft’s online services division. Some of the new features unveiled Wednesday provided a glimpse at how Microsoft hopes to capitalize on a competitive advantage that it gained in October when Facebook agreed to give Bing greater access to the 500 million people who have set up accounts on its social network Google Inc. still isn’t able to compile the same volume of Facebook information in its search index. Microsoft has been chummy with Facebook and its founder, Mark Zuckerberg, since it paid $240 million for a 1.6 percent stake in the privately held company three years ago. Microsoft believes its Facebook relationship will become an increasingly important factor in the search market as people realize how helpful it is to see the recommendations of their friends when they’re looking for information on the Web. The breadth of those recommendations is rapidly growing as people spend more time on Facebook and become more comfortable sharing their preferences. In one upcoming change, if you are searching on Bing while signed into your Facebook account, some of the links listed in the results might include notation showing that one of your Facebook friends liked the website or a product. Bing also will draw from Facebook when processing requests about people. In some instances, the results will show whether the Bing user making the search request shares any common Facebook friends with the person being researched. Microsoft also is betting it can lure Web surfers away from Google by making Bing a one-stop shop for a range of common online activities. Toward that end, Bing has formed an alliance with a specialty search engine FanSnap to enable people to buy tickets from within the results page. It also is working with OpenTable Inc. to provide more convenient access to restaurant reservations. A variety of other revisions are being made to Bing’s image and mobile search. Google also is constantly tweaking its search engine to make it faster and smarter. In the most dramatic change this year, Google in September started to display search results that change with each keystroke in the request box. It’s also trying to get better data about airline flights , a popular search topic, with a proposed $700 million acquisition of travel technology vendor of ITA Software Inc. Microsoft is among several companies pressing the U.S. Justice Department to block the ITA deal on the grounds that it would give Google too much control over online travel bookings. Google dismisses those complaints as misguided. The Justice Department isn’t expected to complete its review of the deal until next year.

Read the full article →

Video: Dunaway Expected More Progress From G-20 on Currencies

November 13, 2010

Nov. 12 (Bloomberg) — Steven Dunaway, adjunct senior fellow for international economics at the Council on Foreign Relations, talks about the results of the summit of leaders from the Group of 20 nations in Seoul. Dunaway speaks with Pimm Fox on Bloomberg Television’s “Taking Stock.” (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Valerie Orsoni: How to Succeed in a Macho World

November 5, 2010

Did you know that there was a time when women ruled the world? When the most revered figures were females: goddesses, empresses, and mothers? But three thousand years ago, the vast majority of humanity abandoned goddesses for gods as our ancestors settled and developed agriculture, marking the end of direct female domination. Or perhaps not? Thanks to their formidable inner-strength and unflinching determination, women soon began to develop their own talents in order to get what they desired, be it a husband, a child, wealth, a house, and more. Women intrinsically knew that achieving a goal was far more important than the path one takes to reach it. Women understood that they should never let men feel they have lost face or have been manipulated. Women inherently recognized that men need to believe they are responsible for their success in order to fully enjoy it. And women have always been aware that confrontation is not the way to victory (ultimately). So how do these realizations translate in our world today? How does the modern woman thrive in today’s macho business environment? There are several ways to succeed. They might all be combined, or they can exist individually, making it fairly easy in the end to succeed in a macho world! MyPrivateCoach / LeBootCamp conducted a survey where we asked 256 people (50/50 men to women ratio) if they agreed or disagreed to 6 specific statements, and the results are exciting! Indeed, the vast majority of women think they need to behave like men in order to be successful, whereas most men believe that what makes a woman successful is, in fact, her femininity! Before sharing the results with you, I’d like to share how one of our participants, Rebecca, summed up the fine line that women tread when doing business in a macho world: “If women are strong, they are ball busters, and if they show any weakness or softness, they are little girls trying to play in a man’s world.” (1) Use feminine attributes (Men: 90% – Women: 25%) Interestingly enough (and should I say, as expected), men and women are absolutely not in agreement on this statement. Little girls’ education gives us some undeniable advantages to compete in a dominantly male group or company: better communication skills, better empathy with colleagues and clients, and most importantly, better cooperation and better understanding of the modus operandi of our workmates. We also have a physical way of expressing our femininity, which men believe we try to hide more often than we should. This is even truer since the start of lawsuits against sexual harassment. However, businessmen are begging us: be yourself! You can dress professionally and in all your femininity without being provocative. Be a woman and be proud of it (keep in mind though, that a little pinch of perceived vulnerability won’t hurt either). However, I do notice that many female executives and CEOs (still too rare) in the software, legal, banking and high-tech industries, wear rather conservative suits (usually pants) and short haircuts… something to think about! Is this the reason for their success? Or are they trying to avoid despising comments like: “I know how she climbed the ladder — short skirt and sexy attitude.” (2) Talk about facts, not feelings (Men: 95% – Women: 30%) Again, it all goes back to our childhood games, and women tend to give more weight to non-tangible elements than facts in a business relationship. While this attitude can be a great sales closing tool, more often than not, it will hamper our efforts in the day-to-day corporate world. Strive at not letting your emotions take over facts. Do not take things personally. When you foresee your feelings may prevent you from considering facts in a clear manner, or negotiating successfully, sit back, relax and reformulate your thoughts and ideas in a logical and rational way. Rather than saying: “I like this idea,” try to (think, and) say: “This idea will work because of XYZ logical or marketing reason that we know about this audience.” This works wonders in a male/female business relationship. If we look at what men and women think about this statement, we see an enormous gap! Almost all men agree that facts matter! Women don’t seem to realize how much of a showstopper the “facts vs. emotions paradigm” is. (3) Don’t imitate male machismo (Men: 76% – Women: 20%) Thriving in a high-profile executive job requires a “genetic” mutation: the development of thick skin (Men: 54% – Women: 89%) typical to men, to prevent direct attacks from hurting while still remaining soft so as not to hurt the male ego. The most effective female business leaders I have met don’t try to imitate male machismo. They use some “feminine” attributes such as greater attention to interpersonal interaction, and a degree of approachability in order to lower people’s defensiveness. But underlying this soft approach they remain focused on the bottom-line goals, express self-confidence, and succeed in achieving those goals without having the men around them feel that they have been manipulated or lost face. What’s more, imitating is irritating. And, though men are not people readers in general, they can see through a bad imitation almost instantaneously. (4) Be a warrior (Men: 25% – Women: 75%) Let’s not deny it: not giving in to male machismo does not mean we should be subdued to everything! Being a warrior, or developing a survivor’s spirit helps a woman be more successful — NO question about it. The only problem is that we are not wired to accurately identify rivals. We are not wired to be warriors; we have to work on becoming one. If you develop into a warrior yourself, think like a man and play his game. Since women have this great ability to adapt to nearly any situation, this should not be too tough. Paradoxically, this attitude will help you mingle better in situations where you are the only woman. But once you’ve found your place, remember to shift to a more feminine (and more efficient) attitude. (5) Treat men as equal (Men: 60% – Women: 76%) Stop thinking he is man, I am woman, there must be some difference. By brainwashing ourselves into thinking about differences, we focus on the wrong element and hinder our ability to succeed. Let’s stop thinking about differences; when conducting business, let’s believe in one species: Homo sapiens. (6) Recognize when the game is over (Men: 82% – Women: 13%) Harking on the past and broaching former incidents when in the heat of an argument, is a typically female habit. This attitude is particularly detrimental to our business success in a dominant male world. What happened five years ago, is over; no need to bring it to the (business) table anymore. I know it is a hard one; we are wired to react this way… but aren’t we also wired to be extremely adaptive? ;-) Keep in mind that this wiring happens when we are very young. Little boys are taught to play war-oriented games and sports, which have a clear end. In contrast, little girls play with dolls and kitchen sets — activities that have no real clear-cut ending; play that is more of a process rather than a timed game. The poll result for this one was very interesting, indicating that women do not consider this attitude as a showstopper when it comes to their success in the corporate world. I bet that you have found yourself using (whether consciously or not) one or more of these key factors to success in a macho world, and likely discovered that it was not THAT easy or THAT straightforward. Recapturing the former woman’s glory, not to mention its social, religious and political power, is considered difficult, if not unattainable. But is it necessary? I don’t subscribe to this point of view. In fact, I don’t support allegation about gender struggle in general, as I have never believed that businessmen and businesswomen were doomed to be at odds. The old dichotomy of black/white, man/woman, power/submission is long gone. In 2010, the “businesswoman homo sapien” species has evolved and is now a patent pending complex mix of 10% man, 2% warrior, 88% woman. I will leave the last words to one of the male participants in the survey, who is definitely not macho: “The best way to succeed in a macho world is to make up your own rules, rather than compete with the macho element. The bottom line is that the macho thing may look formidable, but it’s really not an effective business strategy; (in my opinion) it lacks subtlety…”

Read the full article →

AIG Results…

November 5, 2010

AIG Results…

Read the full article →