retirement

US Coast Guard Response Leader to Join O’Brien’s Response Management

May 24, 2011

SLIDELL, LA–(Marketwire – May 24, 2011) – O’Brien’s Response Management is pleased to announce that Captain Ed Stanton, United States Coast Guard, will join O’Brien’s as Executive Vice President, Response Services on July 18, 2011, following his retirement from the Coast Guard.

Read the full article →

WATCH Over 50 And Out Of Work: ‘My Wife Doesn’t Love Me Anymore’

May 18, 2011

Mike Risinger’s 17-year career as a draftsman started falling apart in 2008. When the financial crisis hit, he spent a year working as a contractor, and then a few weeks working for a friend before a starting an endless stretch of unemployment. Now his wife is working two full-time jobs to pick up the slack. “We see her very little, and usually when we do see her she’s dead tired and doesn’t want to do anything,” Risinger says in a video posted online May 9. “It’s miserable.” Risinger, who lives in Portland, Ore., says one of his two daughters wants to go to college next year. “I don’t know how she’s going to pay for it. The finger gets pointed at me,” he says, his eyes weary. “I seem to have lost my edge. I can’t get an interview anymore.” “My wife doesn’t love me anymore,” the 58-year-old says, smiling instead of crying. “My kids don’t love me.” Risinger’s video lives on Over 50 And Out Of Work , a site created by New York-based journalist Susan Sipprelle to document the jobs crisis among older workers. Sipprelle, 52, is looking out for people like herself. “I could see the impact this is having on my peers,” she says. “So many of our interviewees thought they were set for life.” The site has videos of jobless Americans from all over the country. Sipprelle and her team this week embarked on their final trip — to Louisville, Ky. — where they will film their 100th interview. Workers older than 55 are much less likely to lose their jobs, but once they do, they’re much more likely to be unemployed for a long time. The average jobless spell for older workers now lasts longer than a year . The anxiety and despair among people stuck in this situation has been well-documented in studies, particularly by Carl Van Horn at Rutgers University’s John J. Heldrich Center for Workforce Development . (Van Horn is one of several experts Sipprelle has interviewed for the project.) But statistics and expert witnesses can’t convey the poignancy that Sipprelle’s jobless interview subjects can. Elizabeth Zima , of Calistoga, Calif., for one, has been out of work since she lost her job as a health care writer in 2008 and has already blown through her retirement savings. “I can’t pay my taxes,” says Zima, 57, suppressing sobs in a March 15 video. “I can’t pay my taxes. I’ve always filed. I always have felt it’s been my responsibility. I can’t pay ‘em. Even an extension — I’m not gonna be able to pay ‘em.” Sipprelle says two or three of the people she’s profiled have since found work with pay comparable to what they’d earned before being laid off. A few others have taken jobs with much worse pay, while some have struck out as entrepreneurs. “We have a handful in really, really bad shape,” she says. Watch Mike Risinger’s interview: Mike Risinger from Over Fifty and Out of Work on Vimeo .

Read the full article →

Manisha Thakor : The 77/11 Effect: Will It Hurt Someone You Know?

May 10, 2011

When you hear that women earn less than men… do your eyes glaze over? If you are like me, you’ve heard the statistics so often they almost don’t register: Women earn $0.77 on the male dollar , spend an average of 11.5 fewer years than men in the paid workforce (raising children and tending to elderly parents), and live longer. So we need larger nest eggs to fund our retirements. Yadda, Yadda, Yawn… right? But run a few calculations and you’ll discover that “The 77/11 Effect,” as I’ll call it for short, can be devastating. To illustrate, let’s compare the retirement saving experience of Joe vs. Jane. Joe starts saving $5,000 a year at age 25 (10% of a $50,000 salary). Joe saves this same amount annually until age 70 and earns an average compound annual return over that time of 6% by investing in a balanced mix of low-cost stock and bond mutual funds. At age 70, Joe has a retirement nest egg of $1,063,717. Now, let’s look at Jane. Jane also starts saving 10% of her salary at age 25. Alas, Jane only makes 77% of what Joe does so her contribution is $3,850. Jane keeps this up until age 30. Jane then takes 11 years (rounding here…) out of the paid workforce to raise her kids. At age 41 she re-enters the work world and once again begins saving $3,850 a year until age 70. Both the retirement money she saved pre and post-children grow at 6% a year on average. At age 70, Jane has a nest egg of $506,742. Or said slightly differently… Jane has 1/2 of the nest egg that Joe does as a result of “The 77/11 Effect.” Stunning, isn’t it? Now a few caveats about the data — there are several ways to calculate the wage gap between men and women, with resulting figures ranging from $0.77 to $0.81. Likewise, I’ve seen different stats on how long women spend out of the paid workforce, ranging from nine years to 11.5 years. But even using the “best case scenario” of $0.81 and nine years — we still end up with Jane having a nest egg of $533,066 or a mere 53% of what Joe has. Given at birth Jane is statistically likely to live five years longer than Joe — a range that will grow over the years and get closer to seven years more by the time she reaches retirement, you can see that we have a problem brewing. And it’s not a small one, as revealed by some stunning survey results from DailyWorth.com and ING Direct in a hard-hitting piece aptly titled “Women Drop The Ball On Retirement.” In future posts I’ll talk more about this issue of women’s earnings and pay disparity. But today, I just wanted to put some cold hard numbers to these oft quoted statistics that are so easy to gloss over. [For more on the impact of women's life/work choices, I highly recommend reading Leslie Bennett's wonderful book, THE FEMININE MISTAKE ]. Do you have anyone in your life who will be affected by “The 77/11 Effect?” If so, what advice would you give them? [This post originally appeared at ManishaThakor.com .] Want more financial love? You can follow Women’s Financial Literacy Initiative founder, Manisha Thakor, on Twitter at @ManishaThakor , sign up to get her email updates delivered right to your inbox here , and enroll in her innovative new online personal finance course called “Money Rules.”   

Read the full article →

Public Pension Funds Recovering, But Many Still Too Weak To Keep All Promises

April 28, 2011

A fresh annual survey of the nation’s public pension plans released Thursday revealed that government employee retirement funds plunged in value by a stunning 24 percent in 2009, before recovering many of those losses last year. The snapshot of the nation’s retirement savings underscores how the financial crisis and the Great Recession combined to assail national fortunes, imperiling future generations of retirees. In the fiscal year ending June 30, 2009, state retirement systems lost nearly a quarter of their value, or $641.3 billion, according to new data released Thursday by the U.S. Census Bureau. This left $2.0 trillion in the nation’s public pension funds. The new data comes from the Census Bureau’s 2009 Annual Survey of Public Employee Retirement Systems, which details the state of the nation’s public pension plans on June 30, 2009. “June 30, 2009 was very near the bottom of the market’s decline,” said Keith Brainard, research director at the National Association of State Retirement Administrators. “A lot, quite a bit really has changed since that time.” By the end of calendar year 2010, public pension plans had managed to regain most of their lost value according to a separate report released by the National Association of State Retirement Administrators in April. “They remained invested,” said Brainard. “As confidence in markets has improved and as global equity values have improved and also real estate and private equities have improved, so have the fund balances. That’s what’s fed this growth.” The health of the nation’s public pension funds affects not just the 7.5 million workers who have retired from state and local government jobs but the communities where they live. Public benefit funds pay out a total of $15 billion per month or $180 billion per year to people living in every city and county around the nation. Retirees use that money to cover the cost of everything from health care and shoes to housing and Early Bird Special dinners. It is a key source of spending that helps to drive local economies. The U.S. Census Bureau has been collecting information about the nation’s public pension fund balances since 1957. But fund balances are just part of the story. Most states are legally obligated to pay public employees retirement benefits. By fiscal year 2009, 31 states around the country had underfunded pension plans. These states were collectively $1.26 trillion short of what is needed to continue to make good on promises to pay public employee pensions and other retirement benefits. Pension plan shortfalls widened in some states and spread to new ones in 2009 because market activity ate away at pension fund values at the same time that states faced declining tax revenue. The problem was made worse in some states when they slashed their contributions to employee retirement funds in an effort to address budget gaps. States such as Colorado and Minnesota decided to cut something different, Brainard said. They reduced promised cost-of-living increases for future and current retirees. Lawsuits related to these changes are pending.

Read the full article →

In Many States, Pensions Gap Continues To Grow, Report Says

April 26, 2011

WASHINGTON (Lisa Lambert) – U.S. states are short $1.26 trillion in paying for public employee pensions and other retirement benefits, a gap that grew 26 percent in one year and will take many more years to wipe out, according to a report released on Tuesday. A total of 31 states had pensions that were underfunded in fiscal 2009, the latest year for which data is available, up from 22 states a year earlier, the Pew Center on the States reported. The financial crisis in 2008 crushed many pension funds’ investments, just as historic budget woes forced governments to cut contributions to those funds. The combination “made a serious problem even worse,” said Susan Urahn, the Pew Center’s managing director. In fiscal 2009, which for most states began in July 2008, states were short $660 billion for future pension payments and $604 billion for other retiree benefits, namely healthcare. Growing unfunded pension liabilities on top of still daunting state budget gaps are a top concern of Wall Street rating agencies and investors in the $2.9 trillion municipal bond market. Most states are legally bound to pay retirees benefits, and they must make up for any investment loss from their already depleted treasuries or by borrowing. Pensions are deemed “underfunded” when they are unable to pay at least 80 percent of liabilities. Preliminary data for fiscal 2010 shows that pension funding levels of 10 states deteriorated further, while just three registered increases, Pew found. “Overall, these results suggest that while states benefited from better returns in fiscal year 2010, the legacy of the financial crisis … will remain an issue for years to come,” Pew said in the report. Last year, Pew found states were short $1 trillion in fiscal 2008 on promises to retirees, using data that came from before the financial crisis. States typically assume an 8 percent annual return and their pension plans suffered a median 19.1 percent drop in their assets’ market value in fiscal 2009, Pew said. One critic said the lagging data does not reflect the improvement in current conditions. “Given where we are in time now, talking about 2009 numbers just isn’t useful. The world has changed in the last 18 months,” said Hank Kim, executive director of the National Conference of Public Employee Retirement Systems. “The market has come roaring back.” On Monday, Kim’s group released a survey of 216 public pension funds showing the average return over the last year was 13.5 percent. Illinois consistently has had the lowest pension funding level among states, one that worsened to 51 percent in fiscal 2009 from 54 percent in fiscal 2008, according to the Pew report. In fiscal 2010 and 2011, the state sold $7.16 billion of taxable bonds to raise money for its annual pension payments. A year ago, Governor Pat Quinn signed into law a pension reform measure reducing benefits for new state workers, which he said would save more than $200 billion over nearly 35 years. The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission is looking into “communications” by the state regarding potential savings or reduced contributions to pensions resulting from the law. Five other states, including cash-strapped Rhode Island, have funding levels of less than 60 percent, according to Pew. Conversely, New York’s pension is 101 percent funded, followed by Wisconsin at 100 percent and Washington at 99 percent. States must increase their contributions when returns are low. From 2000, when the systems were well funded, to 2009 these payment requirements grew 152 percent, putting pressure on states to take dollars away from other spending areas. Of late, Republicans in the U.S. Congress have pressed states to assume investment return rates closer to 4 percent, which they consider “riskless.” Using assumptions that private pension plans rely on, which are linked to returns on corporate bonds of about 5.22 percent, Pew found the pension shortfall for states could be as much as $1.8 trillion. By relying on a rate based on a 30-year Treasury bond, Pew found the states’ shortfall could be $2.4 trillion. (Additional reporting by Karen Pierog in Chicago. Graphic by Stephen Culp; editing by Leslie Adler) Copyright 2011 Thomson Reuters. Click for Restrictions .

Read the full article →

Stifel Financial Corp. Announces Retirement of Scott B. McCuaig

April 7, 2011

ST. LOUIS, MO–(Marketwire – April 7, 2011) – Stifel Financial Corp. (“Stifel”) ( NYSE : SF ) announced today the retirement of Scott McCuaig as President, Co-Chief Operating Officer, and Director of its broker-dealer subsidiary, Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated, effective April 1. Mr. McCuaig is also retiring from his role as a Senior Vice President and Director of Stifel Financial Corp. and from similar roles with other Stifel Financial subsidiaries and affiliates. 

Read the full article →

CalPERS Hopes Canyon Can Work Some Magic on its CalSmart CRE Portfolio

April 6, 2011

The California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS) is planning to transfer management of its CalSmart real estate portfolio from RREEF to Canyon Capital Realty Advisors LLC. The portfolio, which had a market value of $570 million on Dec. 31, 2010, consists of 11 office, industrial and apartment properties in San Francisco, Chicago, Florida and southern and northern California. The transfer would be part of the fund’s broad strategic realignment…

Read the full article →

CalPERS Hopes ‘Magic’ Can Work Some On its CalSmart CRE Portfolio

April 6, 2011

The California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS) is planning to transfer management of its CalSmart real estate portfolio from RREEF to Earvin “Magic” Johnson’s Canyon Capital Realty Advisors LLC. The portfolio, which had a market value of $570 million on Dec. 31, 2010, consists of 11 office, industrial and apartment properties in San Francisco, Chicago, Florida and southern and northern California. The transfer would be part of the…

Read the full article →

PIMCO Hires Michael Cogswell as Senior Vice President in the Retirement Solutions Team

March 30, 2011

Reinforces PIMCO’s Commitment to the Retirement Income Market

Read the full article →

Video: Ratajczak Says No One Had as Much `Courage’ as Hoenig

March 25, 2011

March 25 (Bloomberg) — Donald Ratajczak, chief consulting economist at Morgan Keegan & Co., talks about the retirement of Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City President Thomas Hoenig and its impact on Fed monetary policy. Hoenig will retire on Oct.1. Ratajczak speaks with Mark Crumpton on Bloomberg Television’s “Bottom Line.” (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Wells Fargo CEO Pulls In $17.56 Million

March 22, 2011

NEW YORK — John Stumpf, the CEO of Wells Fargo & Co., received compensation valued at $17.56 million in 2010, a 6 percent decrease from 2009, according to an Associated Press analysis of regulatory filings. The San Francisco-based bank credited Stumpf with helping it earn record income of $12.4 billion last year, increasing its market share and positioning the company for success following the financial crisis and regulatory reform. The bank’s revenue in 2010 slid to $85 billion from $88 billion the previous year, however. For the 12 months ended Dec. 31, Stumpf was awarded a salary of $3.24 million, a performance-based stock bonus of $11 million, and a cash bonus of $3.3 million, according to documents filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on Monday. That compares to a salary of $5.6 million, a stock award of $13.08 million, and zero cash bonus in 2009. Stumpf’s total compensation of $18.7 million in 2009 made him among the nation’s highest-paid bank CEOs. Stumpf’s perks totaled $28,531 and included matching contributions to his retirement plan, home security system expenses, a car and a driver. The Associated Press calculations of total pay include executives’ salary, bonus, incentives, perks, above-market returns on deferred compensation and the estimated value of stock options and awards granted during the year.

Read the full article →

Tripped Up At The Finish Line: The Perils Of Unemployment After 50

March 16, 2011

WASHINGTON — Americans are more pessimistic than ever about their retirement prospects, with 27 percent of all workers saying they are “not at all confident” about retirement, according to a yearly survey released Tuesday by the Employee Benefit Research Institute , a nonpartisan think tank. That’s a 5 percent increase from a year ago. What’s worse is that some of the people who should be looking forward to retirement the most don’t even want to think about it. Jayne Dunn, 55, said she’s been out of work since December 2008, when she lost her job as a landscape designer in Cheshire, Conn. She described her job search as “demeaning, demoralizing, just desperately awful” and said thoughts of retirement are forbidden. “You just don’t do that,” she said. “You just think kind of day to day.” Dunn told HuffPost she’s already used up the $5,000 that remained in her 401k when she tapped it in 2009. The EBRI survey found that 34 percent of workers said they’d dipped into savings to pay basic expenses in the past year. Americans Dunn’s age are less likely to lose their jobs than younger folks. But once they lose their jobs, they are more likely to be out of work for a long, long time. The unemployment rate for Americans ages 55 and up stands at just 6.4 percent, compared with 8.9 percent for the population as a whole. But according to the AARP Public Policy Institute, the average jobless spell lasts 45.5 weeks for Americans older than 55, compared with 35.2 weeks for those younger than that. As of October, according to the Congressional Research Service , more than one in 10 unemployed workers older than 55 had been jobless for longer than 99 weeks, which is the cutoff point for unemployment benefits in the hardest-hit states. Just 6 percent of unemployed workers younger than 35 have been out of work that long. And according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, among displaced workers — people who lost their jobs after three years with the same employer — folks older than 55 were much less likely than their younger counterparts to have found new jobs between 2007 and 2010. Many long-term jobless in their fifties say unspoken age discrimination is the reason they can’t find work. Bonnie Krewson of Folsom, Calif., told HuffPost she passed the two-year mark of her unemployment spell on Sunday. Krewson, a 58-year-old former office administrator, said that when she does manage to get an interview, she feels her age is as large an obstacle as her lack of a college degree. When she recently interviewed for an administrative position at a law firm, she said, “I just felt they were going to want to hire somebody a little younger.” She said she’s applied for jobs at places like Home Depot, Sam’s Club and In-N-Out Burger, but almost never gets an interview. Several big retail stores, including Home Depot and Target, require online job applicants to disclose their age . (Walmart, which owns Sam’s Club, does not.) Krewson said her job search has been demoralizing. “It’s making me feel like, ‘What is wrong with me?’” she said. “People tell me all the time, ‘It’s not you, per se. The difference is you’re now competing against 10 times as many people and more than half of those are probably going to have better qualifications.’” Her unemployment benefits ran out in February, Krewson said, so her only monthly income is $190 from General Assistance and $200 in food stamps. Even with the occasional help from family members, she said she doesn’t have enough to cover expenses. She’s got no savings. As for retirement, she said, “I’m really not trying to think about it, although it’s always in the back of my mind.” Sandra Lazzinnaro of West Milford, N.J., told HuffPost she’d worked as a flight coordinator for the past 25 years when she lost her job in November 2008. Now, she said, she works two days a week as a bartender. She said she’s now studying to become a paralegal after spending her entire career in aviation. She recently turned 50. “They could keep telling us 50 is the new 40, but now when it comes to trying to find work … I had to throw out 27 years of experience and reinvent myself. It’s pretty scary,” she said. “We’re in a full-fledged depression. They’re just telling us we’re coming out of a recession, but we’re really not.” As for comfortable retirement, Lazzinnaro said, “I’m thinking it’s like a pipe dream that’s never going to happen.” Dunn, the former landscape designer, is also studying up for a career change. She said she’s taking business classes and wants to start a food pantry that emphasizes confidentiality and dignity for its clients. She said she homed in on her new career goal the moment a volunteer at a food pantry (where Dunn herself previously volunteered) took back from her a can of unsweetened applesauce that pushed her allotment above the 10-pound limit for a single person. “It was the last thing I put on the scale and they took it back out,” she said. “My opinion is, there’s a more dignified way to do that.” Instead of worrying about her retirement, Dunn said she’s focused entirely on getting her business going and is in the midst of a grant-writing effort. “It just feels like that’s what I would love to do for the rest of my life,” she said.

Read the full article →

William S. Lerach: Blame Wall Street, Not Hard Working Americans, for the Pension Funds Fiasco

February 26, 2011

The confrontations in Wisconsin and other states are the opening salvo of a political blame game — who is responsible for the gigantic public pension fund deficits that threaten states’ solvency and workers’ retirement savings? The conservative spin machine blames public employees, claiming their greedy unions extorted extravagant and now unaffordable benefits which justify pension cutbacks and union-busting. This is a false. The real cause of the pension fund debacle is the greed of Wall Street and its corporate allies. It’s a result of their dismantling of our nation’s regulatory safeguards and Wall Street’s capture and abuse of America’s public pension funds — charging them huge management fees, while losing trillions of dollars of pension fund assets in risky investments. Wall Street developed with no regulation. Abuses abounded. Financial markets were corrupt. Then came the 1929 Crash, a wealth destruction event that ended the dreams of an American generation. The Pecora hearings exposed self-dealing and fraud by Wall Street bankers. Wall Street faced ruin. But instead of wiping out Wall Street or nationalizing the banks, we chose to save capitalism and protect investors — by creating a new system of highly regulated financial markets. Congress created the SEC to oversee stock exchanges, require honest accounting and disclosure by corporations and broke up (and strictly controlled) the Wall Street banks. In time, this new regulatory framework created the greatest age of economic growth and prosperity in history. Despite periodic recessions and bear markets — there were no more investor wealth destruction events. As the U.S. became the world’s financial powerhouse, no one got more powerful than the Wall Street banks and their corporate allies. Then they set about undoing the very regulatory framework that had saved them. As politics came to depend on massive infusions of cash, no one provided more of it than corporations and Wall Street banks. They complained that regulation was restricting American competitiveness and economic growth — our citizenry was seduced by promises of greater growth and prosperity. Government, which had actually been the key to the solution, became portrayed as the problem. They captured Congress. And then came the regulatory teardown. Congress deregulated the S&Ls. Then it enacted severe cut backs on investor protections and curtailed their right to sue. Glass-Steagall was repealed — allowing the long forbidden financial giants — investment and commercial banks — to recombine. The Wall Street/ Corporate alliance used its power to see that regulatory agencies passed into the hands of appointees who were hostile to the regulations they were supposed to enforce. Investor protection rules were diluted. A pro-corporate Supreme Court curtailed suits against banks and corporations. The result was behemoth banks, less regulatory oversight and less accountability. So, what came from this era of de-regulation? Increased competitiveness, economic growth, wealth and prosperity? No — instead we got repeated waves of financial fraud and wealth destruction events. First came the S&L blowup of the mid-1980s. Over 3,000 S&Ls collapsed. A few years later it was the 2000-2001 dot.com/telecommunications meltdowns epitomized by WorldCom and Enron. Most recently, our major financial institutions were rocked by scandal — the worst crash since 1929. Investors lost over $20 trillion in these three massive wealth destruction events, which were the result of the teardown of the regulatory framework that had been erected over the prior 70 years to control our financial markets and protect investors. America’s public pension plans — guardians of the life savings of countless working people — were the biggest victims of these wealth destruction events. A pension system is a bet on the future — some money is set aside currently, but not enough to pay all the promised benefits. So, how pension funds are invested and safeguarded is key. Originally, many states required pension funds to invest in safe, interest-bearing bonds. But Wall Street could not make a lot of money from that, so it bank-rolled initiatives and legislation to repeal these protections and permit pension funds to be invested in the stuff they make big profits by peddling. Then Wall Street money managers captured pension funds’ investment portfolios by assuring trustees that ever-higher stock prices would pay for the retirement promises. Charging enormous fees, they made risky stock market bets, putting up to 80% of pension plan assets in the stock market. The Wall Street wisdom that ever-rising stock prices would fund pension plan promises was wrong. In fact, we have seen three major equity wealth destruction events in last 20 years. As a result, the financial situation of our public employee pension funds is precarious. These funds lost hundreds of billions in the S&L disaster and the 2001-2002 market crash. After the 2001-2002 wipeout — guided by Wall Street — fund trustees took much greater risks to try to make up for the prior losses. They poured billions into hedge funds, private equity, speculative real estate and that special Wall Street invention — collateralized debt obligations. Then, in the 2008-2009 financial crisis, the losses of public funds were stupendous. 109 state funds lost $865 billion in about one year. CalPERS lost $72 billion! Now virtually all of these funds are now grossly under-funded. New Jersey and Illinois are each over $50 billion underwater . Why are our public pension systems and plans in such precarious financial condition? Of course there are some examples of excessive pensions, of double-dipping and of “gaming” the system to “goose” the pension amount. But these are few in number. And, even in the aggregate, the financial impact of these excesses pale in comparison to the gigantic investment losses of these pension funds. So let’s place the fault where it really belongs — not with working people — but with Wall Street banks. Who made money on these risky investment gambles? Who takes pension fund trustees to play golf and on so-called “educational” junkets at lush resorts to enjoy lavish dinners? Wall Street. The inappropriate investments that caused these massive pension fund losses were not an accident. The pension fund field caught the Wall Street contagion — financial corruption. It’s called “Pay to Play.” The SEC saw it years ago but, controlled by anti-regulation political appointees, it did nothing. So a nationwide system of political contributions to elected officials who sit on fund boards and payoffs and kickbacks to politically well-connected “Placement Agents” to steer fund money to Wall Street became widespread. Not surprisingly, the investments obtained by “pay-to-play” kickbacks and contributions have generated horrific losses. An investment officer of the California Public Employee Pension Fund was forced to resign — he got an all-expense-paid trip to NYC from an investment group that got $600 million from the fund. The middle men on that deal — two former top CalPERs officials — got some $20 million to arrange this placement. Two other former CalPERS officials have been sued by the Attorney General for taking $50 million in placement fees to steer pension investments. CalPERs lost hundreds of millions on such investments. Alan Hevesi — the former head of the New York State Fund — pleaded guilty to doling out billions in that Fund’s assets to favored managers in return for benefits. The SEC has finally outlawed this system of bribes and kickbacks. But too late — the damage has already been done to the pension funds. Nationwide, public pension funds lost billions on these types of corrupt investments with Wall Street types. The horrible deficit numbers funds admit to actually hide a far more terrible reality. To determine how well a fund is “funded” it uses an assumed rate of return. It estimates how much the fund will earn on its investment portfolio in the future. For decades, public pension funds have assumed 7.5%-8%, even 9% annual growth, i.e., over 100% compounded over 10 years. Fat chance! Today, pension funds are engaged in massive deceptions to conceal the true extent of their funding deficits. They are concealing the massive black holes that haunt public budgets. These ridiculous 7.5%-9.0% assumed rates of return are not “little white lies” — they are Everest-sized whoppers. If the three big California Public Funds used a 4.5%-5% rate of return instead of the 7.5%-8% they now use, these funds would be $500 billion under-funded — 10 times the $50 billion shortfall they admit to. Since this is a nationwide deception going on in virtually all public plans, try extrapolating that out. Public employee funds are probably $3 or $4 trillion underwater. The massive shortfalls we now face exist despite prior “Bull Markets” and the current rally. And the next round of excess of a still under-regulated Wall Street will produce another wealth destruction event that will erase recent gains. This is no academic matter. The time to keep the retirement promises is now upon us. In the next several years, some 77 million U.S. baby boomers — including millions of teachers and public service workers — will enter retirement. Unfortunately, the U.S. public pension system has become a fraud-infested house of cards. Wisconsin shows us this house of cards is starting to collapse, sparking a major political battle. The conservatives will “scapegoat” public employees as a privileged — protected — class. But it was not firemen, cops, clerks, or teachers (or their unions) who lost trillions of dollars in risky investments in an under-regulated stock market over the past 20 years. The Wall Street money managers lost it in investments acquiesced in by the pension fund trustees they had wined and dined. It’s the same old story. The bankers pocket gigantic fees. The privileged few get fat. Ordinary people get run over. And now are even to be blamed — even punished — for a mess they did not create. We cannot allow these public pension plans to collapse. Nor can we break our promises to workers who relied in good faith on promised pensions. Fortunately, there is a solution that could help protect retirees and at the same time help finance our huge federal deficit — if we act fast. First — stop allowing Wall Street money managers to speculate with workers’ retirement savings in risky equities and other crazy investments. Second — create a new 7% or 8% inflation-indexed U.S. Treasury bond only for retirement funds, in staggered 10-30 year maturities. Require all pension plans to buy and hold these bonds. To allow an orderly transition — require that over the next seven years — 80%-90% of all pension plan assets must be put in these safe, high-yield bonds. These bonds will provide low-cost returns for pension funds. This will stop Wall Street’s gouging the funds with huge fees and speculating with workers’ retirement savings. This solution will also help finance our huge federal deficit. While the interest rate is high — we taxpayers are going to end up paying to solve this problem one way or the other. And, at least this way, the interest payments will go to support our fellow retired citizens — not the Chinese. It’s a simple, elegant solution — but Wall Street and the politicians they control will never permit it. William S. Lerach, is a national lecturer, writer and investor advocate. As a practicing attorney, he recovered $45 billion for investors, including $7.2 billion for the victims of the Enron fraud.

Read the full article →

Gardner Denver, Inc. Announces the Retirement of Frank J. Hansen From the Board of Directors Effective November 2011; Diane K. Schumacher to Succeed as Chairperson

February 24, 2011

WAYNE, PA–(Marketwire – February 24, 2011) – Gardner Denver, Inc. ( NYSE : GDI ) announced today that Frank J. Hansen, Chairman of the Board of Directors, has decided to retire following the November 2011 Board Meeting after having reached the customary Board retirement age. The Board has unanimously appointed Diane K. Schumacher member of the Gardner Denver, Inc. Board of Directors since 2000, to succeed Mr. Hansen as Chairperson upon his retirement.

Read the full article →

Hank Morris Is Going To Prison

February 17, 2011

NEW YORK — A former top political consultant to New York’s disgraced ex-comptroller was led off to prison Thursday after being sentenced to at least a year and four months behind bars for his pivotal role in an influence-peddling scandal involving the state pension fund. Henry “Hank” Morris, who rose to political prominence in the state as a campaign manager for Democrats, apologized to the people of the state for compromising their faith in government before a Manhattan judge handed down the punishment. “Words cannot express the depth of my remorse,” he said, his voice and hands shaking as he read a prepared statement. Supreme Court Justice Lewis Bart Stone was unmoved. He sentenced Morris to the maximum allowed under the law, then denied him time to put his affairs in order before going to prison. “No. It’s time to go,” the judge said. Morris, 57, pleaded guilty in November to securities fraud. He admitted using his connections to former state Comptroller Alan Hevesi and other officials who oversaw New York’s massive pension fund to extract kickbacks from investment firms hoping to manage some of the funds’ assets. New York’s $125 billion retirement pool is one of the world’s largest government pension funds and richest sources of potential investment dollars. Over just a few years, Morris made $19 million in fees from companies awarded state business by Hevesi’s office. Prosecutors with the state attorney general’s office and the Securities and Exchange Commission said firms that refused to play ball had a harder time getting their foot in the door. The scandal enveloped a number of state officials and money managers, including Steven Rattner, the Wall Street financier who helped lead the Obama administration bailout and restructuring of Chrysler and General Motors. Morris has agreed to forfeit his millions of dollars in fees and has already repaid the retirement fund about $18 million, officials said. But “it is not sufficient that a thief restore stolen property so as to avoid jail time,” the judge wrote in explaining his sentencing decision. Morris will be eligible for parole after 16 months and would serve no more than four years behind bars. “Throughout my life, I have believed in the potential for government to be a force for good in the lives of people. In fact, I devoted the bulk of my professional life to achieving that goal,” Morris told the court before he was sentenced. “To recognize that my actions undermined those efforts has been very painful.” “Simply put, my actions undermined the integrity of New York State’s government, and, most importantly, have led ordinary people to question their faith in the political system.” As he was led away in handcuffs, he told relatives and friends in the courtroom: “I love you. I love everybody. Thank you.” The pension fund investigation was initiated and led for several years by former State Attorney General Andrew Cuomo, a Democrat who is now the governor. He called Morris’ sentence “a strong signal that it’s time to clean up Albany and the culture of corruption must and will end.” The pension fund probe became a political issue during Cuomo’s run for governor last year. His Republican opponent, Buffalo businessman Carl Paladino, argued that Democrats were going easy on Democrats in the case. Paladino continued his criticism Thursday, saying Morris emerged with too light a conviction and adding, “These people should pay for their indiscretions.” Eight people pleaded guilty to criminal charges in the case, including Hevesi, who admitted taking campaign contributions and luxury vacations from one money manager seeking pension fund business, and David Loglisci, the pension fund’s chief investment officer. Several financial firms also paid more than $170 million in civil penalties for their actions, including well-known, politically connected firms like the Carlyle Group. Rattner, who was accused of arranging for his investment company to pay Morris $1 million to better the firm’s chances of landing an investment deal with the pension fund, ultimately paid $16.2 million to settle civil lawsuits filed against him by Cuomo’s office and the SEC. Attorney General Eric Schneiderman, a Democrat who inherited the case from Cuomo, said Morris’ sentence showed “that those who abuse positions of power to line their own pockets will be held accountable by this office.” ___ Associated Press writer Michael Gormley in Albany contributed to this report.

Read the full article →

Longfellow Benefits Names Five Principals

February 7, 2011

Boston Employee Benefits Firm Promotes Experts in Healthcare and Retirement Plans

Read the full article →

AIG’s CEO To Stay On Despite Cancer

January 24, 2011

BOSTON — American International Group Inc. said Monday that CEO and President Robert Benmosche is healthy enough to remain in his leadership post as he continues undergoing treatment for cancer. Monday’s announcement came three months after the New York insurance company said Benmosche had been diagnosed with cancer and was undergoing aggressive chemotherapy. The company has not specified what kind of cancer Benmosche has. The 66-year-old said in a news release Monday that doctors have given him “an encouraging prognosis,” and that he feels “good.” Since he has responded well to treatment, Benmosche said his doctors “believe I can continue to apply the same commitment and energy to AIG over the next 12 to 18 months.” Benmosche said it’s likely he’ll return to his retirement in 2012. He initially retired in 2006 after leading insurance company MetLife Inc., but was recruited to lead New York-based AIG in August 2009. He replaced Edward Liddy, a former Allstate Corp. CEO who was appointed to lead AIG in September 2008 in connection with the company’s federal bailout. Benmosche has led AIG’s efforts to repay the $182 billion bailout, which pulled the company from the brink of bankruptcy. Earlier this month, that rescue came closer to an end as AIG paid its $21 billion outstanding balance to the New York branch of the Federal Reserve. AIG also converted preferred stock owned by the Treasury Department into more than 1.6 billion shares of common stock that can be sold on the open market. The government will wind down its largest and most complex rescue from the financial crisis by selling stock over the next two years. AIG first announced its repayment plan in September. Since then, the company has worked to raise cash to pay back the government by selling parts of itself around the world. AIG gave an update on Benmosche’s health after the market closed Monday. Its shares fell $1.05, or 2.4 percent, to close at $41.95. The stock added 29 cents to $42.24 in after-hours trading. AIG also said on Monday that its board has agreed that its contingency plan to potentially replace Benmosche remains unchanged. On Oct. 27, two days after announcing Benmosche’s illness, AIG said that if he became unwilling or unable to continue, current Chairman Robert Miller would step in as interim CEO until a permanent replacement for Benmosche is found.

Read the full article →

Deborah Levine: Unemployment: Dispatch From Among the 9.4%

January 20, 2011

A week ago, I found myself surrounded by a room full of strangers listening to confident young man expound on the dos and don’ts of resume writing and acing a job interview. Ok, so “found myself” isn’t exactly accurate. In truth, I was required to be there by the Department of Labor, as were my classmates who, like me, had all been collecting unemployment for at least six months, most of us more. We were a diverse group, united by the fact of being out of work for longer than the higher-ups at the DOL believe we should be. A little guidance was what we needed, our Job Search Follow-Up summonses explained, in the form of a mandatory hour-long workshop on the myriad ways in which the Department of Labor is here to help — preceded by 60 minutes of waiting in an unstaffed windowless room wondering if anyone actually knew we were there. If we failed to attend, the letters said, we would risk losing our weekly unemployment benefits. The room was full. The workshop was led by a deep-voiced 30-something man in a standard-issue jacket and tie. I had to give the guy credit. Day in and day out he stands before countless representatives of the disgruntled formerly-employed and manages to maintain both professionalism and a sense of humor while doing so. Ironically, as jobs go, telling people how to get one — especially people who didn’t ask in the first place — is probably not high on anyone’s list. Among our instructor’s words of wisdom was a warning: “Showing up for an interview 15 minutes early is appropriate — showing up an hour early is desperate,” and an existential question to ponder: “People put on masks every day — to the employer, are you the true you or are you the interview you?” My classmates and I listened dutifully to our leader, hopeful that if we just sat quietly and let him do his thing, we could be out of there in less than the proscribed hour. But he wanted class participation, and so, ever covetous of our weekly $405 checks, we participated. From their replies to questions about the average length of a job interview and the proper timing of a thank you note, I learned a few things about my classmates. My neighbor to the right was a former professor of Russian history so concerned with following the letter of the law that he didn’t file his claim during the week he spent interviewing at a University in Florida because he wouldn’t be able to answer truthfully that we was “ready and able to work” in New York. On my left was a former Human Resources manager with whom the instructor frequently checked his facts, in front of her a client services type copiously taking notes, and behind me a media Jill-of-all-trades not unlike myself, a writer and editor whose position was “eliminated” in a company reorganization after I loyally and enthusiastically put in over a decade at what I had once considered my dream job. In the 19 months since I was laid off (19 and a half, but who’s counting?), I’ve experienced many “firsts”: first time filing for unemployment, first time going into double-digit credit card debt, first time dipping into my rolled-over 401K. Withdrawing from my retirement savings more than two decades before I was technically eligible was something it never occurred to me I might do, let alone do again and again. In the past year alone, overdrawn checking accounts have forced me to tap those once-taboo funds three times, diminishing my meager nest egg nearly by half. Last year’s monetary gifts from relatives earmarked for my kids’ college accounts went instead to bills and rent. On a more positive note, being “downsized” has meant not being a full-time working parent for the first time since I became a mother. This too has led to a number of unexpected firsts: first time picking up my kids at dismissal time rather than from after-school (I actually had to ask someone where in the building I would find them at 3), first time accompanying them on a field trip without nagging guilt about skipping out on work, first time staying home with a sick child without furtively checking my email while playing Connect Four. I’m 40-years-old and for the first time in my adult life I honestly have no idea what the future holds in the way of a career or overall financial security. Still, I know I’m among the lucky ones. Just as my severance was ending a year ago, my husband — who had been laid off from his own publishing job two years earlier — miraculously landed a long-term freelance assignment and is now slated to become staff. Rather than how we’ll pay the rent or make our car payments, our worries are now of the slightly less dire “How will we pay for summer camp, let alone college?” and “Will we ever get out of debt?” variety. We are resigned to having no washer-dryer, dishwasher or second bathroom for the foreseeable future. Having lost faith in the concepts of job security and financial stability, it’s the unforeseeable future we worry about now. While continuing to plug away at freelance work, peruse the industry job sites and pound the pavement for interviews, I’ve gone back to school for yet another degree. This time I’m studying to be a teacher, one of the most underrated jobs one can have in this country, but also among the most rewarding. I have no illusions that I’ll ever be able to kick up my heels and relax into retirement. But if I have to be working for a paycheck into my old age, at least as a teacher I’ll be doing something positive for the world, rather than promoting products I no longer believe in that this planet doesn’t need. Of course, no one’s hiring teachers around here right now either. But a girl’s gotta have a dream.

Read the full article →

Ken L. Bishop to Succeed as President and CEO of NASBA

January 14, 2011

NASHVILLE, TN–(Marketwire – January 14, 2011) –  The Board of Directors of the National Association of State Boards of Accountancy ( NASBA ) announced today that Ken L. Bishop will become President and CEO of NASBA, effective January 1, 2012, following the retirement of current President and CEO, David A. Costello, CPA.

Read the full article →

California Proving To Be a Bear Market for Hines

January 6, 2011

The California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS) has replaced Hines as manager of its National Office Partners (NOP) real estate portfolio and tapped CommonWealth Partners LLC (CWP) to take over the huge office portfolio. The news over Hines losing NOP was tempered by the fact that CalPERS recently agreed to increase its allocation to other Hines-sponsored-fund — notably $190 million to its Brazil fund. CalPERS also has active co…

Read the full article →

Poly Plant Project, a Leader in Polysilicon Production Technology and Equipment, Names Jan Maurits President

January 4, 2011

BURBANK, CA–(Marketwire – January 3, 2011) – Poly Plant Project, Inc. (PPP), worldwide provider of advanced polysilicon production process technology and polysilicon production equipment solutions used to produce high-purity polysilicon for the solar industry and semiconductor industry, today announced that Jan Maurits will become president of the company effective January 1, 2011. Mr. Maurits will succeed Jesse Chen, Ph.D., who announced his retirement. Dr. Chen has served as president of Poly Plant Project, Inc. for the past two years.

Read the full article →