russia

Facebook Hints At Possible IPO Date

January 21, 2011

(AP) NEW YORK — Facebook says it has raised $1 billion from non-U.S. investors through Goldman Sachs. Combined with a $500 million investment from Goldman, funds Goldman manages and Russia’s Digital Sky Technologies in December, the investments value Facebook at $50 billion. Facebook said Friday the money gives it greater financial flexibility. It did say how it plans to spend it. The company says that while it had the option to raise up to $1.5 billion through Goldman, it decided to limit it to $1 billion. As expected, Facebook says it will start filing public financial reports by April 2012. The company noted in a statement , “Even before the investment from Goldman Sachs, Facebook had expected to pass 500 shareholders at some point in 2011, and therefore expects to start filing public financial reports no later than April 30, 2012.” The company expects to have more than 500 shareholders in April of this year. When it does, regulations require it to start reporting is finances to the public within a year.

Read the full article →

Video: Licamele Says BP-Rosneft Deal `Breakthrough’ for Russia

January 14, 2011

Jan. 14 (Bloomberg) — Scott Licamele, a consultant for Emerging Markets Investment Advisory, and Bloomberg’s Ryan Chilcote talk about BP Plc’s agreement with Russian state oil producer OAO Rosneft to form a global strategic alliance. BP will take 9.5 percent of Rosneft shares after the agreement and the Russian company will hold 5 percent of BP, valued at $7.8 billion, according to a statement released during a signing ceremony in London. The companies agreed to develop three blocks in Russia’s Arctic Ocean. Licamele and Chilcote talk with Pimm Fox and Julie Hyman on Bloomberg Television’s “Taking Stock.” (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Video: Weiss Says Rosneft Deal May Give BP Access to Resources

January 14, 2011

Jan. 14 (Bloomberg) — Philip Weiss, an analyst at Argus Research, talks about BP Plc’s agreement with Russia’s state oil producer OAO Rosneft to form a global strategic alliance. BP will take 9.5 percent of Rosneft shares after the agreement and the Russian company will hold 5 percent of BP, valued at $7.8 billion, according to a statement released during a signing ceremony in London. The companies agreed to develop three blocks in Russia’s Arctic Ocean. Weiss talked with Carol Massar and Matt Miller on Bloomberg Television’s “Street Smart” before the statement was released. (This is an excerpt of the full interview. Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Video: Ziemba Expects `Relatively Weak’ 4.3% Growth for Russia

January 7, 2011

Jan. 7 (Bloomberg) — Rachel Ziemba, a senior analyst at Roubini Global Economics, discusses the investment environment in Russia and the outlook for the nation’s economy. Ziemba speaks with Lisa Murphy on Bloomberg Television’s “Fast Forward.” (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Jim O’Neill Goldman Sachs Guru, Sees 2011 At ‘The Year Of The USA’

December 27, 2010

Jim O’Neill shot to fame by predicting the staggering rise of emerging-market economies. Now the head of Goldman Sachs (GS) Asset Management, O’Neill recommended investors buy into so called BRIC economies of Brazil, Russia, India and China a decade ago.

Read the full article →

Video: John Connor Says Russia Likely to Join WTO Next Year

December 23, 2010

Dec. 23 (Bloomberg) — John Connor, manager of the Third Millennium Russia Fund, talks about the prospects for Russia joining the World Trade Organization in 2011. Connor, speaking with Margaret Brennan on Bloomberg Television’s “InBusiness,” also discusses investment opportunities in the country. (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Obama hails New Start Treaty as New Era in Relations with Russia

December 23, 2010

Obama hails New Start Treaty as New Era in Relations with Russia

Read the full article →

India, Russia ink multi-billion agreements

December 22, 2010

India, Russia ink multi-billion agreements

Read the full article →

David Isenberg: Can’t Anyone at DoD Do Oversight? Anyone at All?

December 22, 2010

The perennial issue regarding private military security contractors is the degree to which they are subject to effective oversight. In that regard there is only one item in today’s news worth looking at. That is the report issued by the House Subcommittee on National Security and Foreign Affairs, chaired by John F. Tierney (D-MA). The Majority staff report is titled, Mystery at Manas: Strategic Blind Spots in the Department of Defense’s Fuel Contracts in Kyrgyzstan . The report culminates an eight-month investigation into the Department of Defense’s multi-billion dollar aviation fuel contracts at the Manas Transit Center in Kyrgyzstan. Reminding one of the famous line by 1st Lieutenant Milo Minderbinder in Joseph Heller’s famous Catch-22 novel, “We’re gonna come out of this war rich!” the report found that to keep U.S. warplanes flying over Afghanistan, the Pentagon allowed a “secrecy obsessed” business group to supply jet fuel to a U.S. air base in Kyrgyzstan, turning a blind eye to an elaborate fraud involving fuel deliveries from Russia. The subcommittee found that the Pentagon and State Department diplomats ignored red flags raised by jet fuel contracts worth nearly $2 billion for the Manas Transit Center, a U.S. base used for in-flight refueling over Afghanistan. The fuel was supplied by a Gibraltar-registered business group comprising Mina Corp. and Red Star Enterprises. True, the report found no evidence of corrupt ties between Mina Corp. or Red Star and the families of Kyrgyz leaders. Yet it cautioned that a lack of proper oversight and a neglect of America’s broader interests in the region had often left Washington blind to “political, diplomatic and geopolitical collateral consequences.” These include the ouster of two Kyrgyz governments in popular revolts stirred in part by anger over alleged jet fuel corruption and also U.S. ties with Moscow. Since 2002, the Defense Logistics Agency-Energy has awarded Mina and its sister- company, Red Star Enterprises, four contracts worth $2 billion for fuel at Manas, and has awarded several additional contracts to Red Star for fuel supply to the United States’ Bagram Air Base in Afghanistan. The day after the 2010 contract award, an official from DLA-Energy called the Majority staff of the Subcommittee to ask who owned the companies. The Pentagon did not know. As the New York Times reported , for a number of years ending in April 2010, two Pentagon middleman companies misled the Russian authorities, by using falsified export documents, into thinking that the large quantities of jet fuel they were purchasing were for civilian use, not military, apparently with the intention of evading a tariff. But the fuel was being bought by the Pentagon for shipment to the American airbase in Manas, Kyrgyzstan, and from there on to Afghanistan, the report said. Once Russian officials discovered the true identity of the recipient, they cut off supplies, creating a major logistical headache for United States military commanders. Officials for the contractors expressed little remorse for their actions, the report shows. “We got one over on ‘em,” the report quotes one company official, Charles Squires, as telling investigators. “I’m an old cold warrior, I’m proud of it, we beat the Russians, and we did it for four or five years.” Until, that is, the Russians objected and the system unraveled. That breakdown forced a major redrawing of supply routes into Afghanistan for jet fuel, which is in chronically short supply in landlocked Afghanistan. It also touched off a major behind-the-scenes diplomatic effort by the Obama administration to rebuild the fuel lines. If this is an example of effective contract oversight I’m the Chief of Naval Operations. This fuel supply system accounted for more than half of the jet fuel used in the war, the report said. It is suggested that the Russian authorities knew all along about the falsified certificates, but did not act because the subsidiary of the Russian energy giant Gazprom which supplied the fuel was making profits on the sales. In any case, the Russian Federal Security Service and the Russian Parliament investigated in 2009, the report said, and the trainloads of jet fuel from Gazprom started to dry up, halting altogether on April 1. In a deposition with Congressional investigators, Red Star and Mina Corporation officials characterized the false certificates as necessary to circumvent Russian export restrictions on jet fuel sales to foreign militaries. In interviews, Kyrgyz officials characterized them as an effort to avoid export tariffs. While those assertions remain in dispute, there is no question that the supply disruption caused major problems. Contractors were compelled to buy far more costly fuel that had to be shipped through the Black Sea and sent overland to Kyrgyzstan and Afghanistan. It also forced the military to rely more heavily on supply routes from Pakistan into Afghanistan on vulnerable mountain roads where trucks came under repeated attack this summer. Putting aside for the moment of just how bad the oversight was the strategic question, as geopolitical types like to phrase it, was whether anyone was really interested in doing it in the first place. Here is how the report puts it: Like many of the logistics contracting agencies that support the U.S. war effort in Afghanistan, DLA-Energy has a single-minded focus on providing the warfghters with the goods they need to achieve their mission. Judged by that metric, DLA-Energy’s efforts have been remarkable. The U.S. mission in Afghanistan has required the delivery of billions of gallons of fuel to some of the most remote and hostile locations in the world. Simply stated, without this fuel, the war would come to a grinding halt. But DLA-Energy’s by-the-book focus on performance and price was inadequate for proper strategic oversight of multi-billion dollar fuel contracting in a highly graft-prone region of the world. Policy officials at the Pentagon and State Department did little to nothing to assist DLA-Energy in oversight of its massive fuel procurement contracts. As long as the flow of fuel met demand, the civilian and military officials at the Department of Defense showed little interest in fuel contracting. Te State Department, meanwhile, viewed the fuel contracts as solely a mater for the Pentagon to manage, even when fallout from the contracts badly damaged U.S.-Kyrgyz relations. In short, DLA-Energy, the Pentagon, and State Department all turned a blind eye to the fuel contracts’ serious political, diplomatic, and geopolitical collateral consequences. Evidently what we had here, as was memorably said in the classic movie Cool Hand Luke, was a failure to communicate. Returning to the oversight, or lack thereof, consider just these few paragraphs: 6. DLA-Energy conducted only superficial due diligence on Mina and Red Star, and turned a blind eye to allegations of corruption. Until recently, DLA-Energy never knew Mina and Red Star’s beneficial ownership and never had any clear visibility into their subcontracting relationships. When the interim government of Kyrgyzstan alleged that Mina and Red Star had corrupt relations with the Bakiyev family, DLA-Energy made no inquiry to determine whether the allegations might be true. 7. DLA-Energy took few steps to mitigate potential corruption and ignored red fags of anti-competitive behavior. DLA-Energy had little independent understanding of fuel supply at Manas or in Central Asia and took few steps to mitigate the high potential for corruption in a graft-prone region. When red flags of potentially corrupt or anti-competitive behavior did arise, the agency took no steps to address them. 8. The Department of Defense failed to oversee a highly sensitive fuel supply arrangement created by Mina and Red Star to disguise their fuel procurement. For most of the past five years, Mina and Red Star procured a majority of their fuel from refineries in Russia despite a perceived official Russian ban on the export of fuel for military use. Mina and Red Star constructed complex arrangements in which proxy subcontractors obtained certifications from Kyrgyz authorities stating that the fuel was being procured for domestic civil aviation. According to Mina and Red Star, the Russian refineries were aware that the U.S. military was the ultimate end-user of the fuel, and they believed that the Russian export control authorities were also aware because of the large quantity of fuel being procured. Mina and Red star told DLA-Energy and Pentagon officials about the deception; but, despite extensive memoranda and e-mails documenting the arrangements, senior DLA-Energy officials claimed that they were not aware of the scheme and asserted that there might not have been a Russian ban.

Read the full article →

India, Russia Aim at $20 Billion Trade by 2015

December 21, 2010

India, Russia Aim at $20 Billion Trade by 2015

Read the full article →

Novartis to construct plant in Russia

December 21, 2010

Novartis to construct plant in Russia

Read the full article →

Novartis to invest USD 500 mln in Russia

December 20, 2010

Novartis to invest USD 500 mln in Russia

Read the full article →

UN Climate Deal Marks A Tiny Step Forward For Fighting Climate Change

December 11, 2010

CANCUN, Mexico — A U.N. conference on Saturday adopted a modest climate deal creating a fund to help the developing world go green, though it deferred for another year the tough work of carving out deeper reductions in carbon emissions causing Earth to steadily warm. Though the accords were limited, it was the first time in three years the 193-nation conference adopted any climate action, restoring faith in the unwieldy U.N. process after the letdown a year ago at a much-anticipated summit in Copenhagen. The Cancun Agreements created institutions for delivering technology and funding to poorer countries, though they did not say where the funding would come from. In urging industrial countries to move faster on emissions cuts, it noted that scientists recommended reducing greenhouse gas emissions from industrial countries by 25 to 40 per cent from 1990 levels within the next 10 years. Current pledges amount to about 16 percent. Mexican President Felipe Calderon, in a 4 a.m. speech, declared the conference “a thoroughgoing success,” after two separate agreements were passed. The agreements shattered “the inertia of mistrust” that had settled over the frustrated efforts for a broad climate treaty, he said. One of the agreements renewed a framework for cutting greenhouse gas emissions but set no new targets for industrial countries. The second created a financial and technical support system for developing countries facing grave threats from global warming. Foreign Secretary Patricia Espinosa, the conference president, gaveled the deal through early Saturday over the objections of Bolivia’s delegate, who said it was so weak it would endanger the planet. Decisions at the U.N. climate talks are typically made by consensus, but Espinosa said consensus doesn’t “mean that one country has the right to veto” decisions supported by everyone else. The accord establishes a multibillion dollar annual Green Climate Fund to help developing countries cope with climate change, though it doesn’t say how the fund’s money is to be raised. Last year in Copenhagen governments agreed to mobilize $100 billion a year for developing countries, starting in 2020, much of which will be handled by the fund. The agreements also set rules for internationally funded forest conservation, and provides for climate-friendly technology to expanding economies. Espinosa won repeated standing ovations from a packed conference hall for her deft handling of bickering countries and for drafting an acceptable deal, though it fully satisfied no one. “It’s been a challenging, tiring and intensive week” said U.S. special climate envoy Todd Stern, clearly content with the results. The European Union’s top climate official, Connie Hedegaard, said Saturday’s decisions would help keep international climate talks on track. “But the two weeks in Cancun have shown once again how slow and difficult the process is,” Hedegaard said. “Everyone needs to be aware that we still have a long and challenging journey ahead of us to reach the goal of a legally binding global climate framework.” Christiana Figueres, the U.N.’s senior climate official, said the agreements would put all governments on cleaner trajectory. “Cancun has done its job,” she said. Environmentalists cautiously welcomed the deal. It “wasn’t enough to save the climate,” said Alden Meyer of the Washington-based Union of Concerned Scientists. “But it did restore the credibility of the United Nations as a forum where progress can be made.” The Cancun deal finessed disputes between industrial and developing countries on future emissions cuts and incorporates voluntary reduction pledges attached to the Copenhagen Accord that emerged from last year’s climate summit in the Danish capital. It struck a skillful compromise between the U.S. and China, which had been at loggerheads throughout the two week conclave on methods for monitoring and verifying actions to curtail greenhouse gases. “What we have now is a text that, while not perfect, is certainly a good basis for moving forward,” Stern said during the decisive conference meeting. His Chinese counterpart, Xie Zhenhua, sounded a similar note and added, “The negotiations in the future will continue to be difficult.” The accord “goes beyond what we expected when we came here,” said Wendel Trio of the Greenpeace environmental group. Underscoring what’s at stake in the long-running climate talks, NASA reported that the January-November 2010 global temperatures were the warmest in the 131-year record. Its data indicated the year would likely end as the warmest on record, or tied with 2005 as the warmest. The U.N.’s top climate science body has said swift and deep reductions are required to keep temperatures from rising more than 2 degrees Celsius (3.8 F) above preindustrial levels, which could trigger catastrophic climate impacts. Bolivian delegate Pablo Solon protested that the weak pledges of the Copenhagen Accord condemned the Earth to temperature increases of up to 4 degrees Celsius (7.2 F), saying that is tantamount to “ecocide” that could cost millions of lives. He also complained that the text was being railroaded over his protests in violation of the U.N.’s consensus rules. In the 1992 U.N. climate treaty, the world’s nations promised to do their best to rein in carbon dioxide and other heat-trapping gases emitted by industry, transportation and agriculture. In the two decades since, the annual conferences’ only big advance came in 1997 in Kyoto, Japan, when parties agreed on modest mandatory reductions by richer nations. But the U.S., alone in the industrial world, rejected the Kyoto Protocol, complaining it would hurt its economy and that such emerging economies as China and India should have taken on emissions obligations. Since then China has replaced the U.S. as the world’s biggest emitter, but it has resisted calls that it assume legally binding commitments – not to lower its emissions, but to restrain their growth. Here at Cancun such issues came to a head, as Japan and Russia fought pressure to acknowledge in a final decision that they will commit to a second period of emissions reductions under Kyoto, whose current targets expire in 2012. The Japanese complained that with the rise of China, India, Brazil and others, the 37 Kyoto industrial nations now account for only 27 percent of global greenhouse emissions. They want a new, legally binding pact obligating the U.S., China and other major emitters.

Read the full article →

Ex-Goldman Sachs Programmer Found Guilty Of Stealing Bank’s Computer Code

December 10, 2010

NEW YORK — A former Goldman Sachs programmer was convicted Friday of stealing secret computer code that enables high-speed trading from the company when he took a new job with a rival last year. The jury in U.S. District Court in Manhattan convicted Sergey Aleynikov of North Caldwell, N.J., of theft of trade secrets and transportation of stolen property in interstate and foreign commerce. Aleynikov of North Caldwell, N.J., could face up to 15 years in prison when he is sentenced March 18. Aleynikov and his lawyer, Kevin Marino, declined to comment after the verdict. Prosecutors who had called it a case about theft and greed requested after the verdict that Aleynikov wear an electronic bracelet until sentencing. The judge did not immediately rule on the request. The criminal case was brought after federal authorities concluded that Aleynikov left Goldman Sachs in 2008 with trade secrets to help his new company – Teza Technologies – gain an advantage with high-speed trading. Marino had argued that the case should have been no more than a civil lawsuit rather than criminal charges. Aleynikov, a naturalized U.S. citizen who came to the U.S. from Russia in 1990, left his $400,000 job as a vice president at Goldman Sachs Group Inc. to join Teza Technologies LLC, where he was to be paid $300,000 annually, with a $700,000 bonus in his first year and a revenue-sharing plan that would have added an additional $150,000 annually. Marino said during the two-week trial that his client was merely trying to copy parts of the company’s software that was taken from public software codes. He acknowledged that Aleynikov had violated the company’s confidentiality agreements but said that was a civil matter. Aleynikov was arrested on July 3, 2009, as he returned from a trip to his new employer’s offices in Chicago. The trial brought into focus sophisticated computer programs that use mathematical formulas to execute scores of trades in short periods of time after evaluating moment-to-moment developments in the markets. The government said Goldman Sachs makes millions of dollars a year in profits from high-frequency trading and carries a competitive advantage over rivals because of the speed of its computer programs.

Read the full article →

Joe Biden To Do Damage Control With Democrats Over Tax Cut Plan

December 7, 2010

WASHINGTON — The White House on Tuesday urged congressional Democrats to quickly embrace a contentious tax cut plan that President Barack Obama cut with Republicans, arguing that the rank and file need to move on to other issues before the party loses control of the House in January. White House aides said Vice President Joe Biden will ask Democratic lawmakers to swallow their objections to the administration’s proposed compromise with the GOP when he attends a closed luncheon with senators at the Capitol. Obama’s plan would extend Bush-era tax cuts for all Americans, including the richest, while also extending unemployment benefits and reducing payroll taxes for a year. Before the GOP assumes the House majority next month, the White House wants Congress to take up ratification of a new nuclear treaty with Russia, then address the Dream Act, a measure to give young people whose parents brought them into the U.S. illegally a path to legal status. Democrats also want to vote on whether to repeal the military’s policy that prevents gays from serving openly in the armed services. Republicans control neither the House nor the Senate – and certainly not the White House. But they largely dictated the terms of Obama’s proposed tax-cut compromise, which disgruntled House and Senate Democrats will discuss in separate closed meetings Tuesday that are likely to be rowdy. Republicans prevailed on their biggest demand: continuing Bush administration tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans, despite Obama’s 2008 campaign promise to let them expire for households earning more than $250,000 a year. Obama, while acknowledging Democratic unrest, agreed to extend the tax breaks for two years, whereas Republicans wanted a permanent extension. Obama explained Monday that the concession was the only way to prevent a congressional impasse that would cause the tax cuts enacted in 2001 and 2003 to expire, as scheduled, for all taxpayers. With 9.8 percent of Americans unemployed, he said, that would be “a chilling prospect.” Liberal groups were furious at his willingness to bend, but Obama said he rejects “symbolic victories” that hurt average Americans. His plan also would renew jobless benefits for the long-term unemployed, and grant a one-year reduction in Social Security taxes paid by workers but not by employers. The president had barely stopped speaking Monday before top Republicans applauded his proposals, while most Democrats kept a sullen silence. Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., thanked Obama for “working with Republicans on a bipartisan plan to prevent a tax hike on any American and in creating incentives for economic growth.” Because they hold solid majorities in both chambers, Democrats must provide many votes for the tax package to become law, even if Republicans overwhelmingly support it. Some Democrats quickly denounced the plan. “Senate Republicans have successfully used the fragile economic security of our middle class and the hardship of millions of jobless Americans as bargaining chips to secure tax breaks for the very wealthiest among us,” said Sen. Tom Harkin, D-Iowa. Urging his colleagues to quickly back the compromise was Sen. Joe Lieberman, I-Conn., who caucuses with the Democrats. “This tentative agreement is an example of Washington working across party lines to confront the challenges facing our nation,” said Lieberman, who is up for re-election in 2012. The emerging agreement includes tax breaks for businesses that the president said would contribute to the economy’s recovery from the worst recession in eight decades. The proposed Social Security tax cut would apply to virtually every working American. For one year they would pay 4.2 percent of their income, instead of 6.2 percent, to the government retirement program, fattening U.S. paychecks by $120 billion in 2011. Someone earning $40,000 a year would receive a $800 benefit, and a $70,000 earner would save $1,400, officials said. More than three-fourths of all Americans pay more in these so-called payroll taxes than in federal income taxes. The White House said money from other sources would be shifted so the Social Security trust fund loses no revenue. Obama said he reluctantly made another concession to Republicans, concerning the estate tax. It would tax estates worth more than $5 million at a rate of 35 percent, a GOP goal. Democrats favored a $3.5 million threshold, with a 45 percent tax on anything higher. Obama’s willingness to compromise with Republicans comes a month after the GOP won resounding victories in congressional, gubernatorial and state legislative elections. Addressing his liberal critics Monday, Obama said, “Sympathetic as I am to those who prefer a fight over compromise, as much as the political wisdom may dictate fighting over solving problems, it would be the wrong thing to do.” “I’m not willing to let working families across this country become collateral damage for political warfare here in Washington,” he said. Under his plan, unemployment benefits would remain in effect through the end of next year for workers who have been laid off for more than 26 weeks and less than 99 weeks. Without an extension, 2 million individuals would have lost their benefits over the holidays, the White House said, and 7 million would have done so by the end of next year. Obama’s proposal also would extend a variety of other tax breaks for lower and middle-income families, including the Earned Income Tax Credit and the child tax credit. ___ Associated Press writer Julie Pace contributed to this report.

Read the full article →

Video: Russia, Qatar Face World Cup Infrastructure Challenges

December 3, 2010

Dec. 3 (Bloomberg) — Bloomberg’s Simin Demokan reports on the decision by FIFA, soccer’s governing body, to choose Russia and Qatar to host the 2018 and 2022 World Cups. Plamen Monovski, chief investment officer of Renaissance Asset Management Ltd., assesses the challenge facing Russia. Bloomberg’s Maryan Nemazee also speaks in this report on Bloomberg Television’s “The Pulse.”

Read the full article →

Video: Ulyukayev Says Russia Seeks Balance in Ruble-Yuan Trade

November 24, 2010

Nov. 24 (Bloomberg) — Alexei Ulyukayev, first deputy chairman of Russia’s Central Bank, talks about the ruble and yuan and trade with China. He speaks with Andrea Catherwood on Bloomberg Television’s “The Pulse.”

Read the full article →

Nissan to buy 10% of Russia’s AvtoVAZ

November 21, 2010

Nissan to buy 10% of Russia’s AvtoVAZ

Read the full article →

Video: Russian Fugitive Prepares to Fight Extradition From U.K.

November 16, 2010

Nov. 16 (Bloomberg) — Bloomberg’s Ryan Chilcote reports on the case of Yevgeny Chichvarkin, the co-founder of Russian mobile-phone retailer OOO Evroset, who is living in London but wanted in Russia on charges of kidnapping and extortion.

Read the full article →

China, Russia, Japan firms sign $1b deal

November 14, 2010

China, Russia, Japan firms sign $1b deal

Read the full article →

Margaret Heffernan: Selling Vodka to the Russians

November 5, 2010

Cheer up, we’re living in awful times. That’s pretty much the message you’d take from William Chase — who ought to know. His entire fortune has been won through adversity. As the man who’s now exporting vodka to Russia, he knows a lot about bucking trends. Chase didn’t graduate high school. He took on huge debt to stay in farming and by 1992 was bankrupt. He went into potato trading — acting for farmers dealing with supermarkets. And he didn’t like what he saw, as the big chains so dominated retail distribution that, if you didn’t sell to them, you didn’t sell at all. But Chase wasn’t — isn’t — one to give up lightly. Instead, he started producing hand fried potato chips that looked, smelled and tasted wonderful. And he refused to sell them to big supermarkets. Farm stores, small independent retailers could have them, but when supermarkets tried to sell his product, he sued them — and won. Learning his story, consumers cheered — and bought. That story alone sold the product; that the chips tasted great certainly helped. In 2008, Chase sold his business for $50 million. Feeling lost without his chip business, Chase turned to vodka — using potatoes, again, to produce spirits the old fashioned way. This year, after just three years of production, Chase’s vodka triumphed in blind tastings at the San Francisco World Spirits Competition, beating 249 rivals from around the globe. It’s striking that Chase’s two business successes have taken place against a backdrop of economic gloom. If agriculture hadn’t been doomed, I wondered, would he ever have discovered just how much he was capable of? “No, I don’t think so,” he admitted. “If the farming had been okay, I’d probably still be a farmer. But then I think about 90 percent of people are in the wrong job. Maybe I was in the wrong job. Most people have no idea what they’re capable of.” That such stories emerge in recessions doesn’t transform grim days into cakewalks. But it may not be so accidental that, historically, many great companies emerge in economic downturns. Or, as James Baldwin once told me, sometimes your bad luck is your good luck.

Read the full article →

Dan Dorfman: The Return of ‘Graveyard George’

October 13, 2010

When I was 10 or 11, I went to my first sleep-away camp in upstate New York. One of the more intriguing characters there was a counselor, “Graveyard George,” who was so nicknamed because of all the scary stories he would rattle off to campers prior to bedtime. Graveyards were frequently included in his tales of horror. I thought of George the other day after wrapping up about a 40-minute chat with Jason Huntley, the chief investment officer of Advisor Shares’ Mars Hill Global Relative Value in Colorado Springs, Col., the first actively managed exchange-traded long and short fund (symbol: GRV) listed on the New York Stock Exchange. Huntley, bright, brainy, amiable and a wine lover to boot, is just the kind of guy I enjoy gabbing with, but he’s also a scary fella. Pointing to a fair number of ticking time bombs, he basically argues that too many investors are at risk of being swallowed up by economic and financial quicksand. Employing a hedge-fund strategy — that is, betting certain investments will go up, while others will go down — Mars Hill Global looks to be fully hedged on a dollar basis. At maximum, it can be 50% short or 50% long. Currently, the ETF’s portfolio is exhibiting a decidedly bearish stance with a 25% net short position that Huntley says he would like to enlarge to maybe 50%. Huntley, 38, who has been in the money management game since 1994 and opened Mars Hill Global (assets: $45 million) in July, is not one of those end-of-the-world guys screaming fire to grab headlines with dire predictions of a depression or a massive drop in the Dow to 1,000. While most professionals believe the market is headed higher, Huntley strongly disagrees. Rather, he’s convinced the pieces are in place for continued deterioration of both the economy and the stock market, and he offers some persuasive reasons to document his case. Among the factors that lead him to take a negative posture are excessive leverage, structural unemployment, mounting housing problems and the refusal of banks to lend because they see accelerated writedowns of poor housing loans. Likewise, slower growth out of Europe and the risk that U.S. and European financial and economic problems could blunt a global recovery. The clear and present danger here, as Huntley sees it, is that financial risks are growing. Yet, he notes, investors are pressing the pedal on risk, having bid up stock prices about 10% to 12% since Sept. 1. Ridiculing this rise, Huntley describes it as “a heightened level of complacency that’s downright dangerous.” Why so? Because, he says, Wall Street is too exuberant in its expectations of economic growth, which, means that earnings expectations are also excessive. Over the past 18 months, he points out, companies have squeezed out a lot of profit margins, primarily at the expense of reduced jobs. But you can’t keep squeezing and squeezing forever, he says. Add to this, he observes, are no underlying demand or underlying growth, signs of inflation from rising food, energy and health care prices, the unwillingness of the consumer to spend on a discretionary basis, deteriorating macroeconomic fundamentals and the fact the housing and job markets stink. To Huntley, it means “at some point in 2011, we’ll see a double-dip recession and GDP will turn negative.” Or, in simple language, things will get worse before they get better. What about the Christmas shopping season? Huntley, who also owns a stake in a winery in Walla, Walla, Wa., isn’t saying Santa will be a no-show, but he does expect him to be pretty frugal, noting “this is not a jovial environment for busy holiday spending.” Translating all of this into the performance of the stock market, our grizzly figures global equities are vulnerable to about a 10% to 15% decline between now and year end, with the U.S. and Europe especially vulnerable. Or, he says, if the Bush tax cuts are not extended, we could see a very fast 10% to 15% correction. Looking ahead to 2011, Huntley sees “a very difficult year” for the market, characterized by increased volatility, a further decoupling of emerging markets from the developed markets and very little in the way of expected returns. Apparently, he’s not alone in his fears, what with jittery investors having pulled out an estimated $20 billion worth of domestic stocks in September. On the political front, Huntley expects Obama to be a one-term president because, he says, he’s made too many mistakes and has failed to bring about the positive changes he promised. He also expects Republicans to capture the House in the impending midterm elections, which means, he says, very little will be done in the remaining days of Obama’s presidency in the way of fiscal stimulus and government spending. Mars Hill Global, by the way, doesn’t buy or short individual stocks, preferring instead to use ETFs to take investment actions. Its short positions are heavily focused on financials, notably through ETFs sporting the symbols IAI, KRF, XLF and EUFN, a European financial ETF. Huntley is especially bearish on Citigroup, describing the banking biggie as “a house of cards that will eventually collapse.” Adds our Citigroup bear: “The stock is being artificially propped by the government and questionable accounting rules and I wouldn’t touch it.” The ETF’s long positions center primarily on Russia and China and such small Asian countries as Malaysia, Indonesia and Thailand. So there you have it — the “graveyard George” of the investment arena. What makes it so scary is that if Huntley’s right, we could all soon get an unhappy insight of what financial graveyards are all about. What do you think? E-mail at Dandordan@aol.com

Read the full article →

Video: Ulyukayev Says Russia Central Bank Won’t Buy Public Debt: Video

October 5, 2010

Oct. 5 (Bloomberg) — Alexei Ulyukayev, first deputy chairman at Russia’s central bank, talks about Bank Rossii’s monetary policy and the outlook for lending and the ruble. Ulyukayev speaks with Ryan Chilcote on Bloomberg Television’s “InsideTrack.” (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Video: Matias Says Russia Wants China to Buy More Oil Products

September 28, 2010

Sept. 28 — Vladimir Matias, managing director at Goetzpartners Russia GmbH, talks about energy cooperation agreement between Russia and China. Russia signed agreements with China, the world’s biggest energy consumer, on oil, gas, coal and nuclear power yesterday to deepen economic ties. Russian President Dmitry Medvedev, who’s making his second presidential trip to China since May 2008, said the accords add “impetus to partnership.” Matias talks with Linzie Janis on Bloomberg Television’s “Global Connection.”

Read the full article →

Hyundai launches new plant in Russia

September 22, 2010

Hyundai launches new plant in Russia

Read the full article →

S. Korea, Russia seek employment pact to fuel Biz cooperation

September 20, 2010

S. Korea, Russia seek employment pact to fuel Biz cooperation

Read the full article →

Norway, Russia agree on borderline oilfields

September 16, 2010

Norway, Russia agree on borderline oilfields

Read the full article →

HP Bribery Scandal: U.S. Widens Probe Of Allegations

September 10, 2010

NEW YORK — U.S. investigators have widened their probe of alleged kickbacks paid to Russian authorities by employees of a Hewlett-Packard Co. subsidiary in Germany. Authorities in Russia, Germany and the U.S. have been looking into alleged bribes totaling $11 million paid to secure a $44.5 million contract that ran from 2001 until 2006.

Read the full article →

Damien Hoffman: Is China Building the New-and-Improved Global Empire?

September 8, 2010

First the the Egyptians gave it a run. Then the Greeks and Romans took a try. Later the Iberian Peninsula and Great Britain sat atop the throne for a round. And, of course, there is no shortage of historical dynasties in Asia. However, since the end of WWII, the United States has held the title of most powerful empire on Earth. It all came together with a concoction of confidence, ambition, work ethic, and unity. There were also some very helpful details such as sanctions on Germany and Japan, a war torn Europe and Russia, and a surprisingly insulated Asia. Fast-forward to 2010. The US has squandered a couple generations of wealth through trade imbalances and costly wars. Then the recent economic crisis created the perfect window of opportunity for a faster growing and more economically stable China (FXI) to start deploying their rooks and bishops. My passion is strategy. And when I look at how China has started diversifying away from the dollar, building an internal consumer class, and buying huge reserves of natural resources across the globe, I see an emerging global empire that may never shed an ounce of blood in conquest for their prize. This weekend

Read the full article →

Experts See Trouble Ahead For Developed World

September 4, 2010

CERNOBBIO, Italy — Is the global economy out of the woods? Two years after near-meltdown, with the U.S. looking sluggish, equity markets groggy and Europeans fighting a debt crisis, experts gathered in Italy offered a generally gloomy outlook – especially for the United States and much of the industrialized world. The doomsayers were led by New York University economist Nouriel Roubini, who warned in booming tones that “there is a significant risk of a double-dip recession in the United States” as well as in Japan and many European countries. Some of the assembled experts and leaders at the annual Ambrosetti Forum on the shores of Lake Como were somewhat more upbeat: economist Edwin Truman, a senior fellow of the Peterson Institute for International Economics, predicted that “the most likely global outlook is subpar growth.” But most appeared to agree on a sobering array of basic problems standing in the way of true recovery: _ Many of the growth drivers in place since the collapse of Lehman Brothers are winding up or have ended, including not only the massive stimulus spending but tax breaks, schemes such as the “cash for clunkers” program and – for some countries like Russia – high commodity prices. _ The stimulus deemed necessary to jump-start moribund economies soon causes deficits and debt, upsetting the markets enough to spur austerity – which undermines growth. _ Most of the world’s growth stems from a developing world led by China – which is so dependent on exports that it needs the West to continue to buy, and so will suffer if recovery in the rich world proves short-lived. _ Europe continues to lose competitiveness partly because of the euro, which – for all the fretting over its dip earlier this year at the height of the Greek debt crisis – remains high in purchasing price parity terms versus the U.S. dollar. _ The sector that is widely seen as the spark of the global recession – U.S. real estate – has not recovered, with house-buying flat and the mortgage market, with its related financial instruments, essentially still in ruins. _ The jobs picture is not improving and in parts of the developed world – such as Spain, with some 20 percent unemployment – it is disastrous. The warnings come amid mixed news on indicators. The European Central Bank raised its growth projections Thursday and its president, Jean-Claude Trichet, said recession was “not in the cards.” But the bank said the situation remained uncertain and that it would keep measures to supply banks with additional credit in place until the end of the year. The U.S. unemployment rate rose in August for the first time in four months as hiring by private employers proved insufficient to keep pace with a large increase in the number of people looking for work. The Labor Department said Friday that companies did add a net total 67,000 new jobs last month, down from July’s upwardly revised total of 107,000. But more than a half-million Americans resumed their job searches, which drove up the jobless rate to 9.6 percent from 9.5 percent in July – a figure above the rate in Britain and Germany. “I see a very weak labor market,” said Roubini, who gained celebrity for predicting the global collapse of 2008 when others were still celebrating the boom times. He noted noting unemployment is close to 10 percent and almost 17 percent when including discouraged workers or partially employed ones. He puts the chance of recession at 40 percent or more – a position he has staked in recent weeks – and said even weak growth would still feel like a recession. “The U.S. has to create 150,000 every month in the private sector just to stabilize the rate and prevent it from rising,” he said. “We’d have to create 300,000 jobs every month for the next three years just to bring back the level of employment to before this recession started,” Roubini said. “Nobody … believes the U.S. is going to create any time any amount of jobs like that,” he said. And even that wouldn’t be enough when taking into account the young people entering the labor market, he said. Harvard University historian Niall Ferguson noted that since 2001 the United States has seen its debt-to-GDP ratio double to 66 percent and that it may well be headed toward the danger zone of 100 percent. “This is a completely unsustainable fiscal policy,” said Ferguson. “Pretty soon the U.S. will be spending more on debt service than national security. … That’s a tipping point for any global power.” Americans “just have to go down in their living standards” after years in which their living standards soared in part based on foreign credit which is no longer there,” said University of Munich economics professor Hans-Werner Sinn. Jacob Frenkel, Chairman of JP Morgan Chase International, urged the United States to rein in entitlements as part of a “political deal” that recognizes reality. Chairing a panel, CNBC anchor Maria Bartiromo drew laughs by challenging the scowling Roubini to come up with “any good news.” He offered that “emerging economies have high potential growth.” But even that comes with a caveat: Roubini warned that world growth leader China was too dependent on exports to the struggling West and predicted that within a year its economic growth will be overtaken by India, a huge nation much more reliant on its domestic market for development. The leading Chinese delegate to the forum, Cheng Siwei, seemed to agree with the criticism. “We must change our investment pattern from investment driven to relying more on domestic consumption,” said Cheng, a former top Chinese official who chairs the China Soft-Science Research Society among other positions. What about Greece, whose near-default four months ago rattled the nerves of investors around the globe? “Greece will not make it,” said Sinn. He said the world can either subsidize Athens indefinitely, force a degree of austerity that actually risks “civil war,” or – in what he suggested was the least bad option – encourage Greece to restore its drachma currency despite the domestic banking collapse that could well result. Sinn noted that bond spreads – the difference between the cost of borrowing for troubled countries such as Greece and solid ones such as Germany – have swiftly returned to the startling levels that preceded the Greek bailout in May. Truman ended his remarks on a high note, noting that in recent quarters’ “U.S. productivity increase has been significant.” In the second recent quarter, productivity dropped 1.8 percent. But higher productivity, while good for companies’ bottom lines, is also a reflection of the stagnant labor market and the shrinkage of payrolls as firms hope to produce as much as before with fewer and more productive staff. In perhaps an illustration of that psychology, several hundred business leaders at the forum were asked for their projections on their own companies’ prospects. Voting electronically, some 70 percent predicted a rise in turnover by the end of 2010 and almost half predicted a rise in their firms’ investment. But less than a third saw a chance for new hiring; almost half saw no change – and about a quarter predicted even more reductions.

Read the full article →

Video: Javedanfar Says Russian Role in Iran `Concern’ for U.S.

August 20, 2010

Aug. 20 (Bloomberg) — Meir Javedanfar, an analyst at Middle East Economic and Political Analysis Co., talks about Iran’s nuclear ambitions and the activation of a nuclear power plant in Bushehr by the Russia’s state-run Rosatom Corp. He speaks from Tel Aviv with Andrea Catherwood on Bloomberg Television’s “The Pulse.”

Read the full article →

Video: Unnikrishnan Says Wheat Inventory Levels `Comfortable’

August 16, 2010

Aug. 16 (Bloomberg) — Sudakshina Unnikrishnan, a commodities analyst at Barclays Capital, talks about Russia’s decision to ban grain exports from yesterday through the end of the year. She speaks with Andrea Catherwood on Bloomberg Television’s “The Pulse.”

Read the full article →

Video: Chris Osborne Says Russian Fires to Be `Drag’ on Economy: Video

August 13, 2010

Aug. 13 (Bloomberg) — Chris Osborne, chief executive officer of Troika Dialog USA, talks about the impact of the fires in Russia’s heartland on the country’s economy and commodities. Osborne speaks with Margaret Brennan on Bloomberg Television’s “InBusiness.” (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Video: Barclays’s Unnikrishnan Says Wheat Prices Haven’t Peaked: Video

August 12, 2010

Aug. 13 (Bloomberg) — Sudakshina Unnikrishnan, a commodities analyst at Barclays Capital, talks with Bloomberg’s Rishaad Salamat about the outlook for wheat and corn prices.¶ Wheat futures surged to the highest price in almost two years on Aug. 6, a day after Russia declared a ban on grain exports amid the worst drought in at least 50 years and the country’s Prime Minister Vladimir Putin proposed that Kazakhstan and Belarus follow suit. (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Vitaliy N. Katsenelson: Capitalism — A True Love Story

August 10, 2010

In the 1980s, in Soviet Russia, a few times a year my class walked to a movie theater where we were shown a documentary. Attendance was mandatory. The documentaries were different but the themes were the same: to the accompaniment of patriotic music, we learned about the righteousness of socialism, the greatness of Mother Russia, and the intelligence and foresight of our great leaders. To demonstrate how good we had it, we were shown images of “decaying” American capitalism. Of course, capitalism did not get the benefit of patriotic music as we were shown the poverty-stricken homeless, the KKK burning crosses and lynching blacks, and Russia-hating capitalists being poisoned by hamburgers (of course, later I learned this part about hamburgers was not a complete lie). Last year Americans voluntarily spent a few million dollars to see a documentary by Michael Moore: Capitalism: A Love Story . But don’t kid yourself, this piece of work is not a documentary, it lacks objectivity and has no intention of seeking the truth, and it is anti-American and anti-capitalist propaganda. Mr. Moore is a talented propagandist; in Soviet Russia this documentary would have gotten him a medal and elevated him into a state hero. A successful propaganda initiative has to have three elements: (1) to influence attitudes, instead of providing information, (2) to selectively present facts (i.e., lying by omission) to achieve a certain synthesis, and (3) to get an emotional rather than a rational response. There is little information in this movie. Moore spends the bulk of the film going through our country’s trash and presenting it as the main course. For instance, a corrupt judge sentences innocent teenagers to spend months at a privately owned (i.e., for-profit, nongovernmental) youth-correction facility, while the judge is getting kickbacks from the facility owners. Moore interviews these poor teenagers, and we feel bad for them, as we should. We feel angry. Moore directs this anger towards capitalism (i.e., private enterprise): it is rotten and corrupt. Of course, the fact that corruption and bribery are the rare exception in the US, not the rule (as in Russia), is never mentioned. Really, if you want to make a successful propaganda movie, you must evoke emotion and rightly or wrongly direct it at your subject of hate — in Moore’s case, capitalism. Moore shows families being evicted from their houses, in which some of them have lived for twenty years, and some of them have kids. Again, we feel bad for these people, we feel their pain, and we want to help. We are angry. That’s what Moore wants. But should we be angry at the bank that has given these people a loan? Or perhaps we should accept the fact that some people will make bad financial decisions, and they’ll pay a price. It is the easiest thing to blame a bank, or capitalism — they are not very popular today. But let’s do the impossible, let’s humanize a bank. Let’s say you and I and a few friends put our life savings together and start a bank. We take deposits and make loans. Should we “forgive” a loan on a house to a person who overextended, made bad financial choices, or found himself facing hardship and unable to earn his way out of it? If we do enough of this “forgiving” we’ll go bankrupt, our kids won’t go to college, and we’ll need to ask someone else to “forgive” us for the loans on our houses, credit cards, etc. I am not even mentioning our depositors losing their money (and the FDIC — the taxpayer — bailing them out) and our employees losing their jobs. So the heartless bank — you and I and a few friends — have to make a choice between sacrificing the well-being of our families for the sake of strangers. What would you do? See, this point is too rational and lacks the sensationalism of good propaganda; and thus Mr. Moore, who I am sure thought of it, omitted it. Moore attacks BofA for not resorting to charity and not extending a loan to a factory in Michigan, even after BofA received TARP money. The same logic I just went through applies to the huge, unpopular BofA. Should BofA have thrown away money in a loan to the factory, knowing that the factory would not be able to repay it? Is this not what got us into the present problem in the first place? Banks and Wall Street in general played a role in today’s crisis, but they were just one of many responsible players. Consumers in pursuit of keeping up with the Joneses overextended themselves (with the exception of cases of outright fraud, no one was forced to buy a bigger house). Rating agencies were getting paid by the customers they were rating. The Federal Reserve kept rates at very low levels for too long, politicians pressured lending at any cost, regulators were not regulating – and the list goes on. Vilifying banks as the only culprit is intellectually dishonest and a very myopic way to look at this complex problem, and Mr. Moore does just that! Moore brought a brigade of priests to proclaim: “Capitalism is evil, immoral”; “Jesus doesn’t like the rich”; “the rich will have a hard time getting into heaven.” Two employees from a factory, talking on camera, made a really important point about capitalism. They said something along the lines of, “Maybe we should start a cooperative or something, but no, we cannot; we don’t have the money, we are not capitalists.” Ayn Rand said it well in Atlas Shrugged: “But you say that money is made by the strong at the expense of the weak? What strength do you mean? It is not the strength of guns or muscles. Wealth is the product of man’s capacity to think. Then is money made by the man who invents a motor at the expense of those who did not invent it? Is money made by the intelligent at the expense of the fools? By the able at the expense of the incompetent? By the ambitious at the expense of the lazy?” Moore neglects to admit that capitalism has brought people out of poverty and socialism sunk them there. He blames rising health-care costs on HMOs, though HMOs are just a pass-through vehicle between payers and service providers. He accuses capitalism as a system that “allows getting away with paying so little.” He offers no alternative to our “broken” capitalism system other than let’s have “democracy.” This is laughable, as democracy is not a market system, it is a political system. What he wants is a command-based economy – the Soviet Russia that failed so miserably. He wants Mr. Mouch from Ayn Rand’s Atlas Shrugged, a mediocre bureaucrat who failed at everything in his life, to be put in charge of Mr. Moore’s version of a “democratic” economy (still not sure what that means). Mr. Mouch decided how much everyone produced, at what prices goods were sold, and what “fair” wages everyone got paid. In the end, despite sacrifice after sacrifice, Mr. Mouch’s economy collapses. Mr. Mouch’s visible “fair” hand fails to accomplish what the invisible “impartial” hand of the free market accomplishes so effortlessly. Mr. Moore’s propaganda flick ends with pictures of the aftermath of hurricane Katrina. The images are powerful, full of emotion, and again in his final misdirection, Moore manages to blame it on capitalism. Vitaliy N. Katsenelson, CFA, is a portfolio manager/director of research at Investment Management Associates in Denver, Colo. He is the author of “Active Value Investing: Making Money in Range-Bound Markets” (Wiley 2007). To receive Vitaliy’s future articles by email, click here .

Read the full article →

Video: Rabobank’s Sidwell Discusses Agricultural Commodities: Video

August 8, 2010

Aug. 9 (Bloomberg) — Brady Sidwell, head of advisory at Rabobank Groep NV’s Northeast Asia Food & Agribusiness Research and Advisory Group, talks with Bloomberg’s Rishaad Salamat in Hong Kong about the outlook for wheat and other commodities. Wheat futures in Chicago dropped as much as 4 percent after last week gaining to a 23-month high following Russia’s ban on grain exports. Wheat speculators slowed their bets on higher prices after the biggest monthly gain in Chicago Board of Trade futures in 37 years, a sign the rally may be peaking, according to Grain Service Corp. (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Video: Blanch Says Oil Between $75 and $85 `Okay’ for Economy: Video

August 6, 2010

Aug. 6 (Bloomberg) — Francisco Blanch, head of global commodities research for Bank of America-Merrill Lynch, talks about the outlook for crude oil and gasoline prices. Blanch, speaking with Deirdre Bolton on Bloomberg Television’s “InsideTrack,” also discusses Russia’s ban on wheat exports and the impact on the market. (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Video: Unnikrishnan Says Wheat Prices May Rise to $9 a Bushel

August 6, 2010

Aug. 6 (Bloomberg) — Sudakshina Unnikrishnan, a commodities analyst at Barclays Capital, talks about the impact of flooding and Russia’s export ban on wheat prices. She speaks on Bloomberg Television’s “The Pulse” with Maryam Nemazee.

Read the full article →

Video: Jordan Says Russia Wheat Ban to Benefit U.S. Producers: Video

August 5, 2010

Aug. 5 (Bloomberg) — Kenrick Jordan, senior economist at BMO Financial Group, discusses the outlook for wheat. Wheat rose to a 23-month high in Chicago as Russia, the world’s third-biggest grower, banned exports because of the country’s worst drought in at least a half-century. Jordan speaks with Matt Miller and Lizzie O’Leary on Bloomberg Television’s “Street Smart.” (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Max Keiser: Why Russia Might Be the Best Place for Box Office Futures

August 3, 2010

Box office futures trading in America is dead. I took the position early that box office derivatives trading should be outlawed in the U.S. given the current history of market manipulation and insider trading abuses that have accelerated since the passage of the Commodity Futures Modernizatin Act (CFMA) in 2000 that gave Wall St. new ways to stack the Ponzi scheme deck higher and fraud quotient fatter (predictably, we had the epic crash of derivatives in 2008 as a result). Some people were surprised by my opposition since I was the originator of the concept back in 1996 when I co-founded the Hollywood Stock Exchange — the technology and intellectual property forming the backbone of Cantor Fitzgerald’s Cantor Exchange — that they inherited when they took control of HSX in 2001. For a while, it looked like box office futures might go through. Cantor got CFTC approval to launch, but Blanche Lincoln and the MPAA stopped it from happening for the the obvious conflict of interest problems that would occur when movie studios start trading on their own output using insider information. Combining the fraud of Wall St. with the hype of Hollywood was always going to be a dangerous mix that could destroy yet another American industry. But looking at the global picture. I am of the opinion that box office futures trading could work — if it were hosted in a country outside of the U.S. and far away from the sharks in LA. China, India and Iran are interesting choices but I think the most likely candidate could be Russia. What the global film industry needs right now is some competition. Hollywood itself has become mired in its own derivatives swamp; Toy Story 3, Shrek 4, and the upcoming Indiana Jones 5 are all retreads that are about as much fun to watch as opening up your monthly brokerage statement and finding your collateralized, resecuritized, hybrid, credit default swaps are now trading for zero. How to inject life back into the film industry: If Russia were to launch a multi-hundred billion dollar box office futures market, opportunities would immediately open up for popular culture to change in ways that would decapitalize the tired Hollywood formula, while simultaneously creating momentum for projects that incorporated views from the mid-east and far east; with Russia acting as a geographic and intellectual bridge between East and West. Global popular culture needs to move its center of gravity away from California. Having a box office futures market in Moscow could be just the ticket. The result would be a more well-balanced global cinema market driven less by Hollywood sequels and more by a genuine global pop culture zeitgeist of community and entertainment.

Read the full article →

Video: Macquarie’s Bos Says Wheat Price Surge a `Panic Rally’

August 3, 2010

Aug 3 (Bloomberg) — Alexander Bos, a commodity analyst at Macquarie Bank Ltd., talks about the outlook for wheat prices amid Russia’s worst drought in at least 50 years. Wheat jumped to a 22-month high in Chicago trading yesterday, extending a 38 percent advance in July that was the biggest since 1973. Bos speaks with Andrea Catherwood on Bloomberg Television’s “The Pulse.”

Read the full article →

Howard Steven Friedman: BRIC and Beyond: How Aging Populations Strain Economic Growth

August 1, 2010

In previous articles about BRIC and N-11, the lists of countries identified by Goldman Sachs as being likely to have a major impact on the world economy by 2050, I discussed the importance of population and the limits of accuracy in long-term forecasts. There I noted that population projections are usually much more accurate than projections of GDP per capita and that, barring any changes in national borders or cataclysmic events, China and India will have at least twice the population of any other country in 2050. I also mentioned the importance of the age distribution, but want to expand on this point more. The age distribution is important because there’s an age range where the population is more likely to be employed and producing economic growth. The “support ratio,” commonly defined as the percent of a population between ages 15 to 65, is a snapshot of the age distribution of the population. Large support ratios reflect countries where a large percent of the population is available to work. A significant amount of the growth in Asian economies in the last decade is associated with the demographic bonus of having a large support ratio . If a large percent of the population is in school or retired then the support ratio will be low. The age range used for the support ratio is somewhat arbitrary. For this article I am using the age range 15 to 59, which I will call the “narrow support ratio,” as it reflects the aspirations of many of my friends to be retired before age 60. So what can we say about the age distributions in the G7, BRIC and N-11? Currently the majority of the population in all 22 of these countries is between ages 15 to 59 with Japan and Nigeria having the lowest rates (52% and 53%) while China has the highest rate (67%). That is to say, all 22 countries have “narrow support ratios” greater than 50%. Japan is an older society with more than one-third of its population 60 or older, while Nigeria is a young population with more than 40% of its population less than 15. Over the next 40 years, the declining fertility rates and lengthening life expectancies will likely result in a much older world population. Japan’s “narrow support ratio” is expected to fall below 40% by 2050 meaning there will be a huge financial burden on society. The US will see an aging population, though not as extreme as the rest of the G7. In fact, the US is the only G7 country expected to have a “narrow support ratio” greater than 50% in 2050. Of the BRIC and N-11 countries, China, Russia and South Korea are the only countries expected to have more than one third of their population 60 or older. These three countries stand out in the list of BRIC and N-11 countries as the only ones with “narrow support ratios” projected to be less than 50%. These lower “narrow support ratios” will strain the family’s and government’s ability to support those elderly needing care. Countries that are projected to have declining support ratios are well aware of the upcoming economic challenges. For example, Japan has put into place programs to promote fertility and make child-rearing both more convenient and more affordable. Besides government programs such as this, the other obvious solution is expanding the support ratio. If the typical retirement age is raised to 67 or even 70, this will abate some of the burden but expanding the support ratio needs to be more than an academic exercise. That would require meaningful, productive work to be available for people at these advanced ages. I raise this concern knowing that many unemployed people in their 40s and 50s are the victims of explicit or implicit ageism. As for the BRIC and N-11 countries, those with sharply declining support ratios will be challenged to achieve continuous major growth with China, Russia and South Korea facing more dire prospects than some of the other countries on the two lists.

Read the full article →

Video: Sankey Discusses Conoco’s Planned Sale of Lukoil Stake: Video

July 28, 2010

July 28 (Bloomberg) — Paul Sankey, an energy analyst at Deutsche Bank AG, discusses ConocoPhillips’s planned sale of its entire 20 percent stake in Russia’s OAO Lukoil. Sankey speaks with Carol Massar on Bloomberg Television’s “In the Loop.” (This is an excerpt of the full interview. Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Video: Sankey Discusses Conoco’s Planned Sale of Lukoil Stake: Video

July 28, 2010

July 28 (Bloomberg) — Paul Sankey, an energy analyst at Deutsche Bank AG, discusses ConocoPhillips’s planned sale of its entire 20 percent stake in Russia’s OAO Lukoil. Sankey speaks with Carol Massar on Bloomberg Television’s “In the Loop.” (This is an excerpt of the full interview. Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Video: Sankey Discusses Conoco’s Planned Sale of Lukoil Stake: Video

July 28, 2010

July 28 (Bloomberg) — Paul Sankey, an energy analyst at Deutsche Bank AG, discusses ConocoPhillips’s planned sale of its entire 20 percent stake in Russia’s OAO Lukoil. Sankey speaks with Carol Massar on Bloomberg Television’s “In the Loop.” (This is an excerpt of the full interview. Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Marc Stoiber: How Now, Brand BP?

July 27, 2010

It’s been a hundred days since the Deepwater Horizon exploded . Today the oil cap is in place, Tony Hayward has been exiled to Russia, and we’re rolling up our sleeves for a cleanup of mind-numbing magnitude. While it appears BP has stemmed the flow and the spill won’t get any worse, there are still many unknowns. One of those is the fate of BP’s now infamous ‘Beyond Petroleum’ brand. Any brand would take a drubbing in a catastrophe like this. But BP has been hammered exponentially harder because of the company’s greener-than-thou repositioning in 2000. Even then, there were skeptics who accused BP of greenwashing. But the majority of us believed. In 2003, BP ranked 69th among BusinessWeek’s most valuable global brands. In 2010 it was named one of the most relevant identities of the decade by the blog Brand New. As Derrick Daye and Brad VanAuken write in Branding Insider, “People bought into BP’s repositioning because they saw glimmers of actual behavioral change. But if we had all looked harder, we would have realized that glimmers were all they were.” So can BP’s brand survive this spectacular fall? Or is our sense of betrayal so great that we can never forgive? Not having a crystal ball handy, I relied on my own experience building and saving brands, and came up with a few options that Bob Dudley, the new head of BP, might be contemplating. They are: 1. Sell BP, making all this brand conjecture someone else’s problem 2. Hide BP behind its subsidiaries 3. Become British once more 4. Make BP really stand for Beyond Petroleum Sell BP Dougie Youngson, a London-based analyst at Arbuthnot Securities, said “Things are going to be a lot tougher for BP in the States in the future. It could well be their position in America just becomes untenable and they could ultimately have to sell those assets as a package to one of their peers.” The obvious suitor is Royal Dutch Shell. Ex-BP CEO John Browne said in his autobiography the companies quietly explored such a move in 2004. Steve Goldstein of MarketWatch acknowledges that Shell has problems of its own, but at least they’ve been more in the accounting realm (such as when it infamously overstated the value of its oil reserves at the beginning of the last decade). As such, converting BP USA into Shell would have a calming effect on the brand…or at least it would remove the specter of spills and explosions. Hide BP Behind Its Subsidiaries Amoco, Arco, ampm and Castrol are all well-known BP subsidiaries. BP could conceivably push these brands quietly to the forefront, and take shelter behind them. The BP brand could then be left to die away, or at least keep itself out of the public eye. Although this strategy would damage the subsidiary brands in the short term, people would quickly stop making the connection. There are two clear benefits to this strategy: first, the ‘Beyond Petroleum’ red flag would no longer be waving in the angry consumer’s eye. And second, dispersing the anger among a number of subsidiaries would also disperse the vitriol, making it easier to overcome. In simple English, it’s harder to vent if you aren’t exactly sure who is, and who isn’t associated with the culprit. Become British once more In a conversation with Marty McDonald, Creative Director at Sustainable Brand agency Egg , the option of backtracking on the concept of ‘Beyond’ arose. As Marty said “There’s no way they can live up to Beyond Petroleum.” Marty suggested the best transition might involve letting the ‘Beyond’ brand quietly disappear and replacing it with the original ‘British’ “…while reclaiming the honest truth – that you are a petroleum company.” In Marty’s eyes, the cleanup effort would serve to leave a halo of virtue on the original British Petroleum brand, and allow a retreat to the comfortable place the brand occupied prior to its green repositioning. Although this seems a safe move, and one driven by humility, it isn’t without risk. The massive mea culpa might leave the BP workforce even more demoralized, and unable to bootstrap itself back to corporate health. Make BP Really Stand For Beyond Petroleum Finally, I spoke with Paul Lavoie , Chairman of Taxi Advertising. Lavoie agreed that BP’s disaster could actually become BP’s greatest opportunity. “The brand is in ruins. Radical action is the only thing that will save it. Either it needs to be buried quickly, or brought back to life with a vengeance.” I postulated that BP could save itself – indeed, place its brand in a category of one – by living the innovation in the ‘Beyond Petroleum’ promise. Lavoie agreed “it would work, if the transformation was real; if it came with radical goals; and if the company embraced the transparency and scrutiny of third party measurement.” Yes, it would be risky. There would be failures, shortfalls and doubt. But as Dupont proved between 1995 and 2005, the journey from environmental pariah to respected corporate citizen is possible. Imagine for a moment a BP that declared itself the champion of renewable energy, with hard, progressive, intensely scrutinized goals. Imagine the company apologizing to the people of Louisiana not by taking out full-page newspaper ads, but by building a green energy research lab that becomes a hub of green innovation in the state. Imagine BP underwriting the world’s first coast-to-coast electric vehicle charging network powered by the sun. The possibilities conjure up the excitement and challenge of the Apollo project. Does the company have the stomach to embrace this sort of bold vision? The departure of Hayward may open the doors for it. As unlikely as it seems, it’s still a window of hope and opportunity.

Read the full article →

BP: Tony Hayward OUT, Robert Dudley IN As CEO On October 1

July 27, 2010

LONDON — BP’s embattled Chief Executive Officer Tony Hayward will be replaced by American Robert Dudley on Oct. 1, the company said Tuesday, as it reported a record quarterly loss and set aside $32.2 billion to cover the costs of the devastating Gulf of Mexico oil spill. BP said the decision to replace Hayward, 53, was made by mutual agreement. In a mark of faith in its outgoing leader, the company said it planned to recommend him for a non-executive board position at its Russian joint venture and will pay him 1.045 million pounds ($1.6 million), a year’s salary, in lieu of notice. “The BP board is deeply saddened to lose a CEO whose success over some three years in driving the performance of the company was so widely and deservedly admired,” BP Chairman Carl-Henric Svanberg said in a statement accompanying the quarterly earnings update. Svanberg said the April 20 explosion of the Macondo well on the Deepwater Horizon platform run by BP in the Gulf of Mexico has been a “watershed incident” for the company. “BP remains a strong business with fine assets, excellent people and a vital role to play in meeting the world’s energy needs,” he said. “But it will be a different company going forward, requiring fresh leadership supported by robust governance and a very engaged board.” Hayward, who has a Ph.D in geology, had been a well-regarded chief executive. But his promise when he took the job in 2007 to focus “like a laser” on safety came back to haunt him after the explosion on the Deepwater Horizon rig killed 11 workers and unleashed a deep-sea gusher of oil. He became the lightning rod for anti-BP feeling in the United States and didn’t help matters with a series of gaffes, raising hackles by saying “I want my life back,” going sailing, and what was viewed as an evasive performance before U.S. congressmen in June. On top of the $1.6 million payout, Hayward retains his rights to shares under a long-term performance program which could eventually be worth several million pounds if BP’s share price recovers. The stock has lost around 40 percent since the well explosion. Hayward, who will remain on the board until Nov. 30, will also be entitled to draw an annual pension of 600,000 pounds from a pension pot valued at around 11 million pounds. Svanberg described Dudley, 54, who was thrown out of Russia after a battle with shareholders in the company’s TNK-BP joint venture, as a “robust operator in the toughest circumstances.” Currently BP’s managing director, Dudley grew up partly in Hattiesburg, Mississippi, and has so far avoided any public missteps. He spent 20 years at Amoco Corp., which merged with BP in 1998, and lost out to Hayward on the CEO slot three years ago. Dudley will be based in London when he takes up his appointment and will hand over his present duties in the United States to Lamar McKay, the chairman and president of BP America. BP said that the $32.2 billion charge for the cost of the spill led it to record a loss of $17 billion for the second quarter. The charge includes the $20 billion compensation fund the company set up following pressure from President Barack Obama as well as costs to date of $2.9 billion. But the company also stressed its strong underlying financial position – revenue for the quarter was up 34 percent at $75.8 billion – and Hayward said it had reached a “significant milestone” with the capping of the leaking well. Crews were restarting work to plug the leaky Gulf well after the remnants of Tropical Storm Bonnie blew through, forcing a short evacuation. The U.S. government’s oil spill chief, Retired Coast Guard Adm. Thad Allen, said Monday that the so-called static kill – in which mud and cement are blasted in from the top of the well – should start Aug. 2. If all goes well, the final stage – in which mud and cement are blasted in from deep underground – should begin Aug. 7. BP said the bottom kill could take days or weeks, depending on how well the static kill works, meaning it will be mid-August before the well is plugged for good. Hayward said the company expects to pay the “substantial majority” of the remaining direct spill response costs by the end of the year. “Other costs are likely to be spread over a number of years, including any fines and penalties, longer-term remediation, compensation and litigation costs,” Hayward said. BP said it planned to tell analysts in an update later Tuesday that it will sell assets for up to $30 billion over the next 18 months, “primarily in the upstream business, and selected on the basis that they are worth more to other companies than to BP.” That would leave the company with a smaller, but higher quality Exploration & Production business, it said. The company reported that underlying replacement cost profit – the measure most closely watched by analysts – was $5 billion for the three months between April and June when adjusted for one-off items and accounting effects. That compared favorably with a $2.9 billion profit for the second quarter of 2009. “Outside the Gulf it is very encouraging that BP’s global business has delivered another strong underlying performance, which means that the company is in robust shape to meet its responsibilities in dealing with the human tragedy and oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico,” Hayward said. Higher prices for oil and gas made up for slightly lower output and a loss in gas marketing and trading in Exploration & Production, while Refining & Marketing reported increased profits as a result of strong performance in the fuels value chains and the lubricants and petrochemicals businesses. The company said it planned to reduce its net debt level down to a range of $10-$15 billion within the next 18 months, compared to net debt of $23 billion at the end of June, to ensure that it had the flexibility to meet its future financial obligations. Capital spending for 2010 and 2011 will be about $18 billion a year, in line with previous forecasts.

Read the full article →

Video: Russia’s Soaring Wheat Exports Poised to Overtake U.S.

July 14, 2010

July 14 (Bloomberg) — Bloomberg’s Ryan Chilcote reports from the Lipetsk region of Russia on investment in the country’s agricultural industry and wheat exports.

Read the full article →

Japan, Russia to construct LNG plant

July 11, 2010

Japan, Russia to construct LNG plant

Read the full article →

BP Stock Jumps As Workers Get Closer to Plugging Well

July 8, 2010

NEW YORK — BP shares are closing in on a second straight weekly gain as BP gets closer to plugging a blown-out well in the Gulf of Mexico. The shares have gained about 23 percent since hitting a 14-year low of $27.02 on June 25. They fell slightly Thursday, dipping 9 cents to $33.10 in afternoon trading. The gains have come as BP has taken steps to reassure business partners in the Middle East and Russia that it remains a viable company. BP also is moving closer to completing two relief wells meant to stem the oil gusher in the Gulf. How close was the subject of discussion Thursday. One of the relief wells is expected to intercept the blown-out well pipe within 10 days. National Incident Commander and retired Coast Guard Adm. Thad Allen said how much additional time it will then take to stop the oil from flowing. Reports Thursday said that under ideal conditions, the job could be completed in two to three weeks. But BP spokesmen and the government officials say they probably won’t be finished until mid-August. BP shares have recovered roughly $20.4 billion in value in the past seven trading sessions. Still, shares have lost about 45 percent since the Gulf oil rig explosion on April 20. The blowout ruptured a subsea well about 40 miles off of Louisiana that has sent between 86 million and 169 million gallons of oil into the sea, threatening the entire Gulf Coast. BP already has spent more than $3 billion to corral the spill. It has agreed to set aside another $20 billion for damage claims. With costs growing by the millions everyday, BP canceled its dividend this year, furthering the frustration for investors. BP shares have dropped about $85 billion in value since the spill started, prompting lawsuits by shareholders and employees. The suits argue that the company took excessive risks with its offshore wells. But as BP stock plummeted, analysts argued that investors were overreacting because BP has ample cash flow to handle potential costs of the spill. The stock started rebounding last week. Shares jumped 8.6 percent last week, and this week they’re up about 14 percent. Previously, they had declined for nine straight weeks.

Read the full article →