stock

Video: John Dorfman Likes Intel, Transocean, GT Solar, Amedisys

December 27, 2010

Dec. 27 (Bloomberg) — John Dorfman, chairman of Thunderstorm Capital and a Bloomberg News columnist, discusses equity investment strategy and some of his stock recommendations. Dorfman speaks with Carol Massar on Bloomberg Television’s “Fast Forward.” (Dorfman is a Bloomberg News columnist. The opinions expressed are his own. Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Video: Claro Doesn’t See Any `Disintegration’ in Euro Zone

December 21, 2010

Dec. 21 (Bloomberg) — Francis Claro of Wells Capital Management talks about investing in Europe and his stock picks, including Heidrick & Struggles International Inc. and USG People NV. Claro talks with Mark Crumpton on Bloomberg Television’s “Bottom Line.” (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Stocks Are Surging Since Announcement Of Fed’s Plan

December 17, 2010

Is the Fed’s latest gamble working? The stock market’s 17% rise since Federal Reserve chairman Ben Bernanke announced his plans for a second round of quantitative easing in late August has sparked further speculation that the economy may be on its way to recovery. Bernanke’s push to reinvigorate the economy through a massive, $600 billion series of government debt purchases has been met with mixed responses. Though the move (dubbed QE2, for quantitative easing) is meant to boost employment and lower interest rates, others fear the possibility that it will instead fuel inflation. As its doubled its pre-crisis balance sheet to more than $2.3 trillion , the Fed’s low interest rates and debt-buying programs have done much to enrich corporate coffers. But the program’s effect on the larger economy is less clear. Still, the stock market has surged. This week, the S&P rose to its highest level since September 2008, hitting 1,242.87, which has prompted optimism in some analysts. “The market has positive momentum and it really has been a momentum story since late August,” said Katie Stockton, the chief market technician at MKM Partners , an institutional equity research, sales and trading firm. Stockton noted that her estimate for the S&P’s next high was 1315, if momentum continued. However, the rise in interest rates since QE2 was unveiled has others less convinced. It’s not clear, for one, whether or not the stock market’s rise is due to merely to sentiment — or an economy that’s actually on the mend. “It provides some support to growth,” said Dean Baker, the co-director of the Center for Economic and Policy Research , of quantitative easing. “The recent runup has been slightly more positive news.” But Baker did not take the recent stock market climb to be a major positive indicator for the economy. “There’s always a fair degree of indeterminacy of where the market should be,” he said. “The market is relatively low level in the scheme of things.” Holiday spending, however, is up, a sign that consumers may be ready to spend again. A spokesperson for the National Retail Federation predicted that there will be a 3.3% growth in retail sector this November and December. Further, a survey of leading economic indicators by the Conference Board , a private industry group, rose by 1.1 percent, its highest rate in eight months. “The U.S. economy is showing some sparks of life in late 2010,” said Ken Goldstein, an economist at The Conference Board. Yet despite positive trends in the stock market and spending, unemployment numbers remain high. The nationwide unemployment rate rose to 9.8 percent from 9.6 percent in November, according to the Department of Labor .

Read the full article →

Video: Congress Asset’s Andersen Likes Ford, International Coal

December 17, 2010

Dec. 16 (Bloomberg) — Peter Andersen, portfolio manager at Congress Asset Management Co., discusses U.S. interest rates and his stock picks. Andersen talks with Pimm Fox on Bloomberg Television’s “Taking Stock.” (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Americans’ Wealth Grows, Lifting Hopes For Economy

December 10, 2010

WASHINGTON — Gradually but steadily, Americans are recovering their vast loss of wealth from the recession, thanks to larger stock portfolios. Household net worth grew 2.2 percent in the July-September quarter, fueled by a rally on Wall Street that catapulted stock prices. And stocks have risen more since the new quarter began Oct. 1, further boosting wealth. Those increases are lifting hopes for the economy, especially because Congress seems about to pass a package of tax cuts for most Americans. Both factors help: The stock gains make people feel wealthier. And the tax cuts put more spending money in their pockets. Consumers’ confidence and access to cash are vital because their spending fuels about 70 percent of economic activity. Last quarter, Americans boosted their spending at the fastest annualized pace in nearly four years. Net worth is the value of assets such as homes and stocks, minus debts like mortgages and credit cards. It totaled nearly $55 trillion last quarter, the Federal Reserve said Thursday. The increase from July through September occurred even though the value of people’s real estate holdings sank 3.7 percent. U.S. net worth has risen far from its bottom during the recession: $49 trillion in the first quarter of 2009. Yet it would still have to rise an additional 20 percent to regain its pre-recession peak of $66 trillion. That’s a reminder of the magnitude of wealth Americans lost to the recession. And despite the latest gains, economists think it will take at least until the middle of the decade for people to regain all their lost wealth. In part, that’s because they expect homes and other real estate values in many areas to decline further. “Home prices are going to get weaker over the next year as more foreclosed homes get dumped on the market,” said Scott Hoyt, senior director of consumer economics at Moody’s Analytics. Average household wealth rose to $425,177 last quarter. Adjusted for inflation, the average U.S. household’s net worth has risen nearly 8 percent from its early-2009 bottom. But it’s still about 23 percent below its peak of $553,685 three years ago. Net worth had suffered a setback in the April-June quarter, when it fell 2.6 percent. That was the first quarterly decline since early 2009. At the time, investors’ fears over the European debt crisis had diminished stock portfolios. Since then, stocks have surged. Last quarter, the value of households’ stock portfolios reached $7.8 trillion. That’s an increase of nearly 14 percent from the April-June quarter. In Naugatuck, Conn., David Savage, 51, a manager of a demolition equipment company and a married father of two teenagers, has seen his family’s net worth rise about 5 percent in the past year. The increase is due mostly to investment gains from mutual funds. “I am happy to see my mutual funds finally recovering from some horrible returns over the last couple of years,” Savage said. The value of Savage’s 401(k) account has risen, largely because of his employer’s contributions. Yet his family’s net worth is still well below where it stood before the financial crisis. Even so, Savage plans to put some of his money to work in the stock market. “I’m looking at it as buying at a discount,” he said. Driven by its strongest September since 1939, the stock market’s performance last quarter was by far its best quarterly showing in a year. The Standard & Poor’s 500, a broad gauge of the market’s performance, jumped 10.7 percent. The last quarter to produce a higher return was the July-September period of 2009 – midway through a 13-month bull rally – when the S&P 500 soared about 17 percent. It all translates into more money for the roughly half of U.S. households that own stocks or stock mutual funds. Stock values gained $1.4 trillion in value during the quarter as measured by the Dow Jones U.S. Total Stock Market Index. And they’ve recovered $1.2 trillion more since Sept. 30. About $15 trillion is invested in U.S. stocks, based on the Dow Jones U.S. Total Stock Market Index. The current quarter is further buoying hopes for the economy because stocks have so far risen 8 percent, with three weeks left in the year. As much as savings were shrunk by the market’s plunge in 2008 and early 2009, most investors are whole again in their retirement accounts – thanks to higher stock prices and their continued investment in the accounts. According to estimates by Jack VanDerhei of the Employee Benefit Research Institute, 86 percent of people with 401(k) retirement savings plans now have more money in their accounts than at the market peak in October 2007. That figure doesn’t tell the whole story, though. Recovery has been much slower for older workers, who lost more in the downturn. Nearly a third of workers with 20 or more years in retirement plans still have less money in their accounts than they did three years ago, according to the EBRI’s data. The S&P 500 remains 21 percent below its 2007 highs. Still, many analysts foresee higher stock prices as the economy improves further. “We expect household net worth to keep its momentum,” said Gregory Daco, senior economist at IHS Global Insight. “Financial gains should offset real estate losses resulting from lower housing prices and very weak sales.” The stagnant values of homes and other real estate holdings are limiting the improvement in Americans’ wealth, the Fed’s report showed. The value of those holdings fell 3.7 percent last quarter. That followed a scant 0.5 percent rise in the prior three months. The outlook for housing remains dim. Homes are most people’s biggest asset. But their values are still depressed in many markets. Most economists expect home prices nationally to decline 5 percent to 10 percent by the middle of next year. In some markets, declines will likely be steeper. Most economists think consumer spending, led by the wealthy, will rise further in the months ahead. But they still don’t think most shoppers, especially low- and middle- income Americans, will spend lavishly. Shrunken home equity, scant wage gains and high unemployment will keep spending in check. More Americans are building up savings and paring debt. That’s helping repair their personal finances. But it doesn’t help fuel the nation’s economic growth. Consumers saved 5.8 percent of their disposable income last quarter. That was down slightly from 6.2 percent in the April-June quarter. It’s still much higher than the 1-percent-plus rates just before the financial crisis. People are steadily trimming debt. The Fed said overall household debt dipped to $13.4 trillion in the July-September period. That’s a 3.5 percent drop from a peak in early 2008. Households, on average, are carrying around $43,321 in debt, ranging from mortgages and credit cards to auto loans and home equity lines. Debt now accounts for 122 percent of Americans’ disposable income – down from a peak of 135 percent in late 2007. ___ Carpenter reported from Chicago. AP Business Writer Mark Jewell in Boston contributed to this report.

Read the full article →

Insider Trading Probe Leads Investors To Wonder: Is The Market Rigged?

November 24, 2010

NEW YORK — The Wall Street insider trading investigation may lead everyday investors – already rattled by a stock market meltdown, a one-day “flash crash” and the Madoff scandal – to finally conclude that the game is rigged. “A large part of trading has to do with trust, and I don’t have it,” says Mark Swenson, a 43-year-old plumber from New Hampshire who refuses to buy individual stocks. “When a stock moves up 10 percent, you don’t know why,” he added. “We can pretend that everyone has access to the same information, but they don’t.” Even before news broke that federal investigators were looking into whether hedge funds traded on inside information, small-time investors were pulling their money out of stocks – despite a remarkable run for the market since the spring of 2009. Americans have pulled $60 billion out of U.S. stock funds this year, according to the Investment Company Institute, a trade group. Meanwhile, investors have piled money into Treasuries and bond funds that are considered safer investments, even if they don’t return as much money. And at the same time, banks like Wells Fargo have reported that money is moving into checking and savings accounts. To be sure, it’s natural for people worried about their jobs or the falling value of their homes to sock cash into more conservative investments. But this has been no garden-variety recession. It has coincided with turmoil in the stock market that goes back a decade, to the collapse of the Internet bubble and portfolio-draining scandals involving high-flying companies such as Enron and WorldCom. More recently, investors have lived through the housing bubble, the collapse of Wall Street firms such as Bear Stearns and Lehman Brothers and stomach-churning days when it wasn’t clear whether capitalism would survive. On top of that came news that financier Bernard Madoff had bilked investors out of billions. “Virtually everyone on the Street believes there are significant improprieties, and I think there is an even more important point for the massive number of investors who are not Wall Street players,” says former New York Gov. Eliot Spitzer, once known as the “sheriff of Wall Street” for aggressively prosecuting white-collar crime as state attorney general. “And that is for most of us, you can’t beat these guys at their own game.” People are nervous about the state of their assets in part because their homes are worth so much less these days, not to mention job insecurity and slow economic growth overall. Some pros on Wall Street say hesitation by small investors is good news. It means that there’s plenty of “dry powder” to propel the market higher in the next few months when and if the little guy finally relents and joins in the rally. The insider-trading probe could test that theory. The FBI this week searched the offices of three hedge funds, and some of Wall Street’s most influential firms, including Janus Capital Group, have been subpoenaed in the probe. On Wednesday, an employee of a firm that supplied market intelligence to hedge funds was arrested and charged, among other things, with conspiracy to commit securities fraud. It was not yet known whether the man dealt with the funds raided this week. For Swenson, the allegations of insider trading are unnerving, particularly on top of the “flash crash” in May, when a computerized selling program set off a chain reaction that drove the Dow Jones industrials down nearly 1,000 points in mere minutes. The sell-off was a reminder to some individual investors that hedge funds and other powerful traders use computer programs to make rapid-fire stock trades, giving them an advantage over the slower smaller investor. “The hedge funds are resorting to more questionable tactics. It’s mind-boggling,” says Swenson, who invests largely in exchange-traded funds, which track market indexes and can be traded throughout the day, unlike mutual funds. Spitzer says the new insider trading probes illustrate how the game is tilted against small investors. “If you are sitting there in front of a screen, thinking your information is going to be good enough to make smart judgments that will permit you to outperform the hundreds of thousands of people on Wall Street who have access to better information and more timely information than you, you’re mistaken,” Spitzer says. It’s not the first time small investors have been scared out of stocks. Charles Geisst, a finance professor at Manhattan College who has written 18 books on the history of markets, says investors balked at buying for years after the Crash of 1929 and Black Monday in 1987. The view both times: The odds are stacked against the little guy. To combat such an impression, the Securities and Exchange Commission was established in 1934, and “circuit breakers” were instituted after the 1987 crash to stop massive selling. But all of the safeguards don’t seem to be helping lately. “If the stock markets had any reputation for integrity, they lost it in the past year,” Geisst says. Restoring small investors’ confidence may depend on whether they see ample evidence that federal regulators are successfully cracking down on bad behavior, says Ross B. Intelisano, a securities fraud attorney with the firm Rich & Intelisano. The market needs them back. Most of the stock in U.S. companies, both public and private, is held by individuals, not institutions, according to Federal Reserve data. Small investors may be comforted to know that professional investors don’t always fare better, even with the edge they have over the masses. Numerous studies have shown that mutual funds overseen by professional stock pickers often are outperformed by computer-driven index funds. The record for hedge funds hasn’t been so impressive, either. Since 2008, when the number of those funds hit 10,000, nearly 3,000 have gone out of business, according to Hedge Fund Research in Chicago. “The edge is hugely exaggerated,” says Richard Ferri, founder of the investment advisory firm Portfolio Solutions and an advocate of low-cost index funds. “If the small investor does the right thing, he can do better than 99 percent of anyone else.” ___ Associated Press writer Michael Gormley contributed to this report from Albany, N.Y.

Read the full article →

Facebook Derivatives? As Shares Soar, Investors Cash In

November 24, 2010

Nov. 24 (Bloomberg) — Facebook Inc.’s surging valuation is spurring shareholders to slice and dice their stock, giving investors everywhere from Silicon Valley to Wall Street a chance to bet on the company. EB Exchange Funds LLC, based in San Francisco, as well as New York firms Felix Investments LLC and GreenCrest Capital LLC, have opened Facebook funds for investors looking to get a piece of the social-networking company and its half-billion users.

Read the full article →

Video: Francois Says Chrysler Has Improved Vehicle Quality: Video

November 19, 2010

Nov. 18 (Bloomberg) — Olivier Francois, head of the Chrysler brand at Chrysler Group LLC, discusses Chrysler’s revamped models. Francois talks with Pimm Fox on Bloomberg Television’s “Taking Stock” from the Los Angeles Auto Show. (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Video: Evan Smith Likes Oil, Mining and Agriculture Stocks

November 15, 2010

Nov. 15 (Bloomberg) — Evan Smith, a portfolio manager at U.S. Global Investors Inc., discusses his investment strategy for commodities and some of his stock holdings including CF Industries Holdings Inc. and Massey Energy Co. Smith speaks with Margaret Brennan on Bloomberg Television’s “InBusiness.” (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Sleep Holdings, Inc. Completes Name Change to All-Q-Tell Corporation and Receives New Stock Ticker Symbol ALLQ

November 5, 2010

DALLAS, TX–(Marketwire – November 5, 2010) – Sleep Holdings Inc. ( PINKSHEETS : SLHJ ), a Nevada Corporation, announced today that it has completed its name change to All-Q-Tell Corporation ( PINKSHEETS : ALLQ ) and has been issued stock ticker symbol ALLQ effective as of November 3, 2010. (All-Q-Tell Corporation was formerly known as Sleep Holdings, Inc., which was previously traded under the stock symbol SLHJ.) The name and ticker symbol change were effectuated in order to more accurately reflect the future of the company. 

Read the full article →

Video: Barton Biggs Says Fed Is `Absolutely Right’ With QE

November 5, 2010

Nov. 5 (Bloomberg) — Barton Biggs, co-founder of Traxis Partners LP, and William Fleckenstein, president of Fleckenstein Capital Inc., talk about the Federal Reserve’s decision to purchase Treasuries and the impact on the stock market and the U.S. economy. They speak with Betty Liu on Bloomberg Television’s “In the Loop.” (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Dan Dorfman: Signs of a Nice Jobs Surprise

October 30, 2010

Hey, good news. Just maybe we’re seeing some light at the end of the jobs tunnel. Come Friday, we’ll get the October employment numbers which numerous economists predict will show a paltry gain of between 25,000 and 75,000 new private sector jobs. Too low, says economist Madeline Schnapp, a consistent and accurate bear on employment trends over the past year. Now, though, she has suddenly shifted gears over the near term, citing such job-hiring stimulants as a lot of home refinancing, brisk hi-tech infrastructure spending, an upswing in health care hiring and a jump in commodity prices. To Schnapp, director of economics at West Coast liquidity tracker Trimtabs Research, which is partially owned by Goldman Sachs, it means an employment surprise — the creation of about 100,000 new private sector jobs in October. That would follow some recent good news on the employment front — namely a fall in the latest weekless jobless claims to 434,000, the lowest level since July. A one time seismologist who used to predict earthquakes, Schnapp now predicts a mini-market explosion in reaction to her higher than expected jobs numbers, something on the order, she figures, of a Dow rise on Friday of between 150 and 180 points. While pointing to signs of a pickup in employment, Schnapp is quick to stress that “we’re still not over the hump since we need to create 150,000 to 200,000 a jobs a month just to keep up with population growth.” She also sees the market vulnerable to another economic shock, such as further rise in oil to say $100 to $120 a barrel, which would send the currently rising gas price to $4-$4.25 a gallon. It’s now above $3 a gallon in a number of areas of the country. Getting back to the stock market, a lot of leery stock market players are suddenly hot to trot again, obviously seduced by the recent rise in equity prices, namely a surge in the Dow of more than 1,000 points or about 11% since Sept. 1. “You can easily sense greed and risk are back in fashion,” says Los Angeles money manager Arnold Silver of A. Silver Associates, who notes that he’s getting increasing calls from clients about speculative stocks that he says no one in the world should ever think twice about. “People seem to have lost sight of the huge market decline in recent years and all the lost wealth,” he says. “I think it’s dumb to do that this soon, considering all the unknowns.” Like most people, Silver, who views the market as overbought and vulnerable at current levels, looks for the G.O.P. to rack up solid election-day gains. But he thinks it would be a mistake for investors to over-react to a GOP victory because he doesn’t see any immediate benefits, notably cutbacks in government spending, reduction in entitlements, the avoidance of higher taxes or substantive new steps to pep up a slightly improving economy. “We’re looking at a lame duck President and political gridlock, which means little, if anything, will get done in Washington,” says Silver. “Why would anybody think that’s good for stock prices?” One of Wall Street’s premier technicians, Oppenheimer & Co.’s Carter Worth, is also hoisting warning flags. If indeed he’s on the money, it’s worth giving some thought to an old saying, When everything is coming your way (as is the case now with many stocks), you’re in the wrong lane. His latest readings suggest Wall Street’s bulls would be wise to take a breather before they’re the ones who get gored. The danger, as Worth sees it, is that the early birds have caught the worms, that the good news that has compelled stock prices higher is already being discounted in the marketplace. Here, he’s referring to pretty decent third-quarter earnings, the second round of quantitative easing (QE2) from the Federal Reserve and Republican gains in the mid-term elections. As such, he’s telling clients that the market, as measured by the S&P 500, should wind up the year at pretty much where it started (at about 1115). Since the index is currently around 1180, Worth essentially is warning that equity prices are headed lower. The most dangerous market sectors, as Worth sees them, are the financial and consumer discretionary areas. In the latter area, he views Chipotle Mexican Grill and Fossill as especially vulnerable since, he says, they’re both overextended and priced to perfection. His most appealing sectors: energy, industrials and utilities. He’s also enthusiastic about gold. whose uptrend, he notes, remains intact. His favorite gold stocks are Barrick Gold and Newmont Mining. What about Apple, the apple of many an investor’s eye? It, too, is viewed as extended, but Worth says its uptrend remains intact, allowing the stock free to work its way higher. As for Google, another market favorite, he says it has been repriced higher to a difficult level and is likely to back and fill for many weeks How does the market usually perform during mid-term elections? Sam Stovall, Standard & Poor’s chief investment strategist, offers some perspective. During the 20 mid-term elections since 1930, the S&P 500 rose an average 2.2% in November and posted increases 65% of the time. What do you think? E-mail me at Dandordan@aol.com .

Read the full article →

Rep. Carolyn Maloney: Privatizing Social Security: Haven’t We Seen This Movie Before?

October 22, 2010

Privatizing Social Security was a bad idea in 2005 when it was proposed by President Bush and rejected by the American people. It’s still a bad idea, despite recent Republican attempts to revive it. Three new analyses out this week make clear that GOP proposals would cut benefits for middle-income Americans, jeopardize the solvency of the Social Security Trust Fund and weaken the program’s ability to keep millions of Americans out of poverty. The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP), the Chief Actuary of Social Security, and the U.S. Congress Joint Economic Committee (JEC), which I chair, have each weighed in on the Social Security proposal introduced by Republican Congressman Paul Ryan. While Republicans have sought to recast their proposals as modest changes to the current system, they are anything but that. The new CBPP report finds that Rep. Ryan’s proposal would reduce benefits for the top 70 percent of earners by linking Social Security benefits to change in prices, rather than changes in wages, as is now the case. Additionally, increasing Social Security’s full retirement age, as called for in Ryan’s plan, would reduce benefits for everyone regardless of when they retire. According to the Chief Actuary of Social Security , the “progressive price indexing” proposal would reduce benefits by 17 percent compared to current law for a new retiree in 2050 with medium earnings ($43,000 today). The cuts get deeper over time and are steeper for higher income workers. By 2080, benefits converge at a much lower level, with little difference in benefits for high earners and medium earners. At that point, Social Security would bear little resemblance to today’s program, where benefits are based on a worker’s lifetime earnings. The JEC report , prepared by the committee’s Majority Staff, looks at privatization, where future retirees are able to divert a portion of their payroll taxes to private investment accounts. Privatization would allow all retirement savings accumulated by retirees to be subject to fluctuations in the performance of asset markets, including the stock market, where significant swings in returns and account accumulations are possible from year to year and even month to month. A worker with a private account could purchase an annuity with a fixed monthly payment at the end of his or her working life. However, the size of that monthly payment depends on the timing of retirement relative to the performance of the different asset markets that the retiree had invested in. For example, a retiree who invested solely in the stock market over a 40-year work history and was expecting an annuity of $867 per month in 2006 would have received only $399 per month if he had retired in 2008. Republicans claim that the Social Security Trust Fund would ensure that individuals who invest in private accounts will get back as much as they put in, plus indexing for inflation, even if the stock market craters. But such a guarantee – where private account holders win when the stock market is up, and don’t lose when the stock market falls – must have another source of funds during bear markets. Without additional funds to pay for this one-sided bet, the solvency of the General Fund will be at risk. While Social Security benefits are modest, they have a major impact. Without Social Security, nearly half (46 percent) of senior citizens would live in poverty, but with Social Security the poverty rate for elderly Americans falls to 10 percent. Indeed, Social Security accounts for more than 76 percent of income for middle-class seniors. The Republicans ignore these facts and plan to radically change a program that provides economic security and peace of mind to millions of Americans. Their proposals are either a misguided belief in the stock market’s ability to miraculously “save” Social Security or a cynical attempt to gut a successful program that has kept generations of Americans economically secure. The more we learn about privatization and progressive price indexing, the worse — and riskier — the ideas look. Congresswoman Carolyn Maloney represents parts of Queens and Manhattan in the House of Representatives, where she chairs the U.S. Congress Joint Economic Committee.

Read the full article →

US Dollar Probes Higher as Stock and Oil Prices Stall, Gold Pulls Back

October 17, 2010

US Dollar Probes Higher as Stock and Oil Prices Stall, Gold Pulls Back

Read the full article →

US Dollar Probes Higher as Stock and Oil Prices Stall, Gold Pulls Back

October 17, 2010

US Dollar Probes Higher as Stock and Oil Prices Stall, Gold Pulls Back

Read the full article →

Robert Reich: The Fed’s New Bubble (Masquerading as a Jobs Program)

October 16, 2010

The latest jobs bill coming out of Washington isn’t really a bill at all. It’s the Fed’s attempt to keep long-term interest rates low by pumping even more money into the economy (“quantitative easing” in Fed-speak). The idea is to buy up lots of Treasury bills and other long-term debt to reduce long-term interest rates. It’s assumed that low long-term rates will push more businesses to expand capacity and hire workers; push the dollar downward and make American exports more competitive and therefore generate more jobs; and allow more Americans to refinance their homes at low rates, thereby giving them more cash to spend and thereby stimulate more jobs. Problem is, it won’t work. Businesses won’t expand capacity and jobs because there aren’t enough consumers to buy additional goods and services. The dollar’s drop won’t spur more exports. It will fuel more competitive devaluations by other nations determined not to lose export shares to the US and thereby drive up their own unemployment. And middle-class and working-class Americans won’t be able to refinance their homes at low rates because banks are now under strict lending standards. They won’t lend to families whose overall incomes have dropped, whose debts have risen, or who owe more on their homes than the homes are worth — that is, most families. So where will the easy money go? Into another stock-market bubble. It’s already started. Stocks are up even though the rest of the economy is still down because of money is already so cheap. Bondholders (who can’t get much of any return from their loans) are shifting their portfolios into stocks. Companies are buying back more shares of their own stock. And Wall Street is making more bets in the stock market with money it can borrow at almost zero percent interest. When our elected representatives can’t and won’t come up with a real jobs program, the Fed feels pressed to come up with a fake one that blows another financial bubble. And we know what happens when financial bubbles get too big. Robert Reich is the author of Aftershock: The Next Economy and America’s Future , now in bookstores. This post originally appeared at RobertReich.org .

Read the full article →

Dan Dorfman: The Return of ‘Graveyard George’

October 13, 2010

When I was 10 or 11, I went to my first sleep-away camp in upstate New York. One of the more intriguing characters there was a counselor, “Graveyard George,” who was so nicknamed because of all the scary stories he would rattle off to campers prior to bedtime. Graveyards were frequently included in his tales of horror. I thought of George the other day after wrapping up about a 40-minute chat with Jason Huntley, the chief investment officer of Advisor Shares’ Mars Hill Global Relative Value in Colorado Springs, Col., the first actively managed exchange-traded long and short fund (symbol: GRV) listed on the New York Stock Exchange. Huntley, bright, brainy, amiable and a wine lover to boot, is just the kind of guy I enjoy gabbing with, but he’s also a scary fella. Pointing to a fair number of ticking time bombs, he basically argues that too many investors are at risk of being swallowed up by economic and financial quicksand. Employing a hedge-fund strategy — that is, betting certain investments will go up, while others will go down — Mars Hill Global looks to be fully hedged on a dollar basis. At maximum, it can be 50% short or 50% long. Currently, the ETF’s portfolio is exhibiting a decidedly bearish stance with a 25% net short position that Huntley says he would like to enlarge to maybe 50%. Huntley, 38, who has been in the money management game since 1994 and opened Mars Hill Global (assets: $45 million) in July, is not one of those end-of-the-world guys screaming fire to grab headlines with dire predictions of a depression or a massive drop in the Dow to 1,000. While most professionals believe the market is headed higher, Huntley strongly disagrees. Rather, he’s convinced the pieces are in place for continued deterioration of both the economy and the stock market, and he offers some persuasive reasons to document his case. Among the factors that lead him to take a negative posture are excessive leverage, structural unemployment, mounting housing problems and the refusal of banks to lend because they see accelerated writedowns of poor housing loans. Likewise, slower growth out of Europe and the risk that U.S. and European financial and economic problems could blunt a global recovery. The clear and present danger here, as Huntley sees it, is that financial risks are growing. Yet, he notes, investors are pressing the pedal on risk, having bid up stock prices about 10% to 12% since Sept. 1. Ridiculing this rise, Huntley describes it as “a heightened level of complacency that’s downright dangerous.” Why so? Because, he says, Wall Street is too exuberant in its expectations of economic growth, which, means that earnings expectations are also excessive. Over the past 18 months, he points out, companies have squeezed out a lot of profit margins, primarily at the expense of reduced jobs. But you can’t keep squeezing and squeezing forever, he says. Add to this, he observes, are no underlying demand or underlying growth, signs of inflation from rising food, energy and health care prices, the unwillingness of the consumer to spend on a discretionary basis, deteriorating macroeconomic fundamentals and the fact the housing and job markets stink. To Huntley, it means “at some point in 2011, we’ll see a double-dip recession and GDP will turn negative.” Or, in simple language, things will get worse before they get better. What about the Christmas shopping season? Huntley, who also owns a stake in a winery in Walla, Walla, Wa., isn’t saying Santa will be a no-show, but he does expect him to be pretty frugal, noting “this is not a jovial environment for busy holiday spending.” Translating all of this into the performance of the stock market, our grizzly figures global equities are vulnerable to about a 10% to 15% decline between now and year end, with the U.S. and Europe especially vulnerable. Or, he says, if the Bush tax cuts are not extended, we could see a very fast 10% to 15% correction. Looking ahead to 2011, Huntley sees “a very difficult year” for the market, characterized by increased volatility, a further decoupling of emerging markets from the developed markets and very little in the way of expected returns. Apparently, he’s not alone in his fears, what with jittery investors having pulled out an estimated $20 billion worth of domestic stocks in September. On the political front, Huntley expects Obama to be a one-term president because, he says, he’s made too many mistakes and has failed to bring about the positive changes he promised. He also expects Republicans to capture the House in the impending midterm elections, which means, he says, very little will be done in the remaining days of Obama’s presidency in the way of fiscal stimulus and government spending. Mars Hill Global, by the way, doesn’t buy or short individual stocks, preferring instead to use ETFs to take investment actions. Its short positions are heavily focused on financials, notably through ETFs sporting the symbols IAI, KRF, XLF and EUFN, a European financial ETF. Huntley is especially bearish on Citigroup, describing the banking biggie as “a house of cards that will eventually collapse.” Adds our Citigroup bear: “The stock is being artificially propped by the government and questionable accounting rules and I wouldn’t touch it.” The ETF’s long positions center primarily on Russia and China and such small Asian countries as Malaysia, Indonesia and Thailand. So there you have it — the “graveyard George” of the investment arena. What makes it so scary is that if Huntley’s right, we could all soon get an unhappy insight of what financial graveyards are all about. What do you think? E-mail at Dandordan@aol.com

Read the full article →

Georges Ugeux: Why Oracle’s CEO Should be Fired and its Board Sued by Shareholders

October 5, 2010

(A premature version of this blog was posted by mistake yesterday) Corporate America doesn’t get it. This is not only the banks. Larry Ellison is definitely the best paid CEO of America: he pocketed $ 1.84 billion dollars over the last 10 years according to the Wall Street Journal. His shareholders lost 12 % over the same period. I thought incentive compensation to CEOs was deemed to recompense performance: Oracle is a perfect example of what is wrong with Corporate America. Compensation of CEOs has long been the subject of arguments and generally deemed outrageous. It is what makes the face of U.S. corporations the synonym of greed. But what is now at stake, is that, while the amounts themselves are outrageous, their correlation to performance has become questionable. Last week Mr. Ellison launched an attack on the HP Board for the way Mark Hurd, its President, resigned from HP. Does he forget that his shares trade at 11x earnings, while HP’s trade at 21x earnings? Is that a vote of confidence of shareholders? Mr. Hurd received a severance package of $ 40 million for a meager 39% increase of the stock price of the company during its tenure. Ellison actually immediately rehired Mark Hurd, in a move that demonstrates why golden parachutes have no raison d’être. He continued by criticizing HP’s choice for the replacement of Mark Hurd, Leo Apotheker, the former CEO of SAP AG, a direct competitor to Oracle. He asked for “the resignation of the HP Board en masse…the madness must stop”. Mr. Ellison is right: the madness must stop. But let’s make it stop urgently at Oracle with a CEO who paid himself outrageously while his shareholders got nothing. The Chairman of that Board is Jeffrey O. Henley is … the former CFO of Oracle for 15 years. This makes him a former subordinate of Larry Ellison. He is also a member of the Executive Committee chaired by Larry Ellison and, as such, not an independent Chairman. Based on those facts, one is not surprised that the Oracle’s Board opposed the creation of a Board Committee on the sustainability of the Company to “review the company’s corporate policies, above and beyond matters of legal compliance, in order to assess, and make recommendations to enhance, the company’s policy responses to changing conditions and knowledge of the natural environment, including but not limited to, natural resource limitations, energy use, waste disposal, and climate change.” Beyond this situation, however, we need to reflect. Is there any such thing as corporate governance at Oracle? The resignation of Joseph Grundfest from that Board in 2006 should have rung an alarm bell: he is a respected professor of Board governance at Stanford University and a former SEC Commissioner. He launched the Arthur and Toni Rembe Rock Center for Corporate Governance at Stanford Law School and founded the prominent Director’s College at Stanford. He resigned in 2006 because his position at the Rock Center was deemed not to be compatible with his duties as a director of Oracle. The lack of reaction of its main institutional shareholders is a shame. I am sure that College America is fully satisfied to hold 6% of the stock and be its largest shareholder, thereby being able to finance. The failure of the Board of Directors of the Banks should not make us forget that Oracle, HP, Enron and BP suffered from the same blindness. The fact that such situations are allowed to persist discredits Corporate America and its claim to “the best governance in the world”. Larry Ellison said he was “speechless”. So am I, Larry, but probably not for the same reasons.

Read the full article →

Is It Time To Ditch The Dow?

September 28, 2010

NEW YORK — It’s Caterpillar’s market. The Illinois maker of earth movers is just one of 30 companies in the Dow Jones industrial average, but you wouldn’t know it from its impact on the index recently. Caterpillar’s stock is responsible for 40 percent of the Dow’s climb since the beginning of the year. Translation: If not for Caterpillar Inc., the world’s most widely followed stock index would be up just 2.5 percent this year instead of 4.1 percent. Take out gains from the next three biggest contributors to the index – McDonald’s Corp., DuPont Co. and Boeing Co. – and we would be sitting on losses. “It’s all about Cat,” marvels BNY ConvergEx strategist Nicholas Colas in a recent report. “Names like Microsoft, Cisco, Bank of America and Intel might be large companies but as far as Dow impact goes, they are tiny.” Caterpillar is one of the great American success stories coming out of the recession. Sales of its loaders, excavators and harvesters jumped 37 percent in August, much of that thanks to demand abroad. So if you like to cheer on the Dow now that it’s risen for a fourth week in a row, news that Caterpillar is the pied piper of those gains should make you happy. Just don’t confuse the Dow with the stock market or the economy. Notwithstanding our attention to its every rise and dip, the Dow has a big flaw that explains its top-heavy nature. The index gives greater weight to high-priced stocks than to low-priced ones. You might think investing $30 in a mutual fund tracking the Dow means $1 is riding on each of the 30 stocks. In reality, the higher the price, the more of that $30 is allocated to that stock. Stock in Caterpillar closed Friday at $79.73 a share – more than four times the price of General Electric Co. or Intel Corp. That means if you put money into a mutual fund tracking the Dow, more than four times as much of that money will end up in this one stock than in GE or Intel. Now consider that this buying could raise the price of the stock, begetting more buying. So, as Caterpillar was leaving other Dow members in the dust with a 40 percent rise this year, more and more of each new dollar in the index went into this manufacturer. In fact, a fifth more of your money is going into Cat now than it would have at the beginning of the year. Meanwhile, the stock has gotten expensive, too. It trades now at 20 times estimated earnings this year versus 13 times for the average Dow member. Of course, you should really do the opposite: Buy more when stock is cheap. All this would be mere curiosity if so much of our mood and money didn’t seem to hang on the Dow lately. When the index is up, we’re up. When it’s down, we’re down. The question now: With the recovery in doubt, will the index confirm our hopes that better times are around the corner and continue to climb? In no small part, the answer is rather prosaic. Check back on Oct. 21 when Cat announces earnings for the third quarter. Analysts are expecting a profit of $1.07 a share, more than double what it reported a year earlier. The distortions of the Dow also matter because of the way we’re now investing. After two crashes in a decade, individual investors are pulling money out of stocks. For those sticking with equities, there’s an equally interesting shift in where we’re putting our money: mutual funds tracking equity indexes with computers rather than funds run by highly paid stock pickers. There are many indexes beside the Dow, of course. One that gets much more of our money is the Standard & Poor’s 500. It allocates dollars according to a company’s market value, or the stock price multiplied by the number of shares. The S&P also spreads its bets over 500 stocks so there’s less risk of a single soaring stock bringing down the index if it stumbles. But the S&P suffers from the same self-reinforcing ill of the Dow. As the market value of a company rises, S&P index funds buy more of the stock, lifting the price. As tech stocks rose in the late 90s, index funds pushed them higher still. Ditto for financial stocks before the last crash. Instead of protecting us from our all-too-human swings from greed to fear, the computers running the index funds exaggerate them. One index that tries to fix this problem is the PowerShares FTSE RAFI 1000. The index was designed by Research Affiliates, a money management firm run by famed S&P critic Robert Arnott. Instead of dividing money according to market values, it does so based on a company’s cash flow and other fundamentals. PowerShares is down -5.44 percent annually over three years, but that is 2.15 percentage points better than the S&P. The flaws of our most popular indexes aren’t new. They started when Charles Dow listed a handful of big stocks and their prices on a piece of paper and decided we should buy one share of each instead of multiples and fractions of those shares so our money and risk would be equally divided among the companies. His original sin should have doomed the measure but for one thing: He did this in 1896. Of course, old brands die hard. We’re drawn to them despite ourselves. “You can get some distorted results,” says Harris Private Bank strategist Jack Ablin of the Dow, though he concedes, “I still follow it.” ConvergEx’s Colas rips into its price-weighting as “arbitrary” but in the next moment is talking excitedly about how the index is older even than that most venerable symbol of American capitalism, the New York Stock Exchange Building (erected in 1903). And so warts and all, the Dow will continue to shape our views. “It influences our perception of the economy,” Colas says. “And right now perceptions matter.”

Read the full article →

Dan Dorfman: Bad Guys Ballooning on Wall Street

September 17, 2010

Wall Street’s bad guys continue to multiply even though their idol, Bernie Madoff, currently serving a 150-year jail term, would be the first guy to tell them that crime doesn’t pay. Indicative of this accelerating bad guys trend is the stepped-up number of insider trading probes by two of Wall Street’s leading regulators on the securities beat — the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Financial Independent Regulatory Authority (FINRA), which oversees nearly 4,700 brokerage firms. Both, I’ve learned, have recently kicked off investigations into the stock trading of a trio of prominent companies prior to their receiving well publicized buyout offers in recent months totaling about $58.5 billion. These fresh, unreported investigations center on what one aspect of Wall Street killings — the illegal kind — are all about. In brief, you buy a stock and you’re lucky. Some firm steps in and makes a bid for the company at a sizable premium to the existing share price and you reap a big gain as the price of the shares balloon. Then again, maybe you weren’t so lucky. Maybe it was a sure thing transaction. Maybe you bought the stock after obtaining privileged, non-public information, which is precisely what Gordon Gekko did before winding up in jail. That’s basically what the SEC and FINRA are looking into with regard to the three takeover offers in question. They involve: –The $38.6 billion hostile bid by Australian-based BHP Billton, the world’s largest mining company, to acquire Canada’s Potash Corp., the globe’s biggest fertilizer supplier. The bid was rejected. –An $18.5 billion offer by French drug maker Sanofi-Aventis to buy Genzyme Corp., a leading U.S. biotech company. That bid was also rejected. –A $1.2 billion offer by Hertz Corp., later raised to $1.43 billion, to acquire a rival in the rent-a-car business, Dollar Thrifty Automotive. It’s all very legal, of course, to buy the shares of a takeover candidate, but not if you have precise knowledge of an impending buyout offer that has not been publicly disclosed. That’s not playing the game on the up and up. If you’re caught cheating — namely, illegally trading on inside information — you can, as you well know, get hit with a hefty fine, join Madoff and Gekko in the clink, or both. With the mergers and acquisitions game heating up, thanks to low interest rates, strengthened balance sheets, a desire by companies to beef up their growth prospects in a weak economic environment and pent-up efforts by overseas corporations to crack the U.S. market, the opportunities to beat the system with inside knowledge of non-publicly announced deals have become much greater. Apparently suspicious that some unethical trading may indeed have taken place in the shares of Potash, Genzyme and Dollar Thrifty Automotive, the SEC and FINRA in recent weeks sent out inquiries to the brokerage community in which they specifically requested the names of any clients who traded in these securities both in domestic and foreign markets in specific time periods. It’s unclear whether any of the investigations mentioned here extend beyond the trading in the companies’ securities. Both agencies declined comment, but I have obtained copies of internal SEC and FINRA documents from a regulatory contact that detail the three investigations. In addition, both agencies recently initiated a number of other stock trading investigations, with energy companies particularly conspicuous. Again, I have gotten my mitts on copies of regulatory documents detailing these investigations. Included here are SEC probes into such stocks as Valero Energy, Hess Corp., Adobe Systems, Transocean, Ltd., Occidental Petroleum, Valeant Pharmaceuticals International, Annaly Capital Management, Lennar Corp., Hewitt Associates, Americredit Corp., BMC Software, Halliburton, Cameron International and Las Vegas Sands. Meanwhile, FINRA, the documents show, is probing the trading in such stocks as Priceline.com, BJ’s Wholesale Club, Atlas Pipeline Partners, L.P., Prospect Medical Holdings and DigitalGlobe. What does it all mean? That insider trading is far from dead and the securities industry’s cops monitoring the Wall Street beat probably need more handcuffs. I don’t want to sound like a broken record, but about a year ago I wrote a similar kind of piece on stock trading investigations and tried to explain why there are so many bad guys on Wall Street. One answer — “Because our product is money and money attracts scum” — was given to me then by Malcolm Lowenthal, a stockbroker at Kern Suslow Securities. That covers it all. What do you think? E-mail me at Dandordan@aol.com .

Read the full article →

Richard Barrington: Safe Harbor: From Money Market Accounts to Municipal Bonds

September 16, 2010

A harsh dose of stock market volatility in May 2010 sent many investors running for the exit. or those who have chosen to pull back on their stock allocations, the next question is where to put the money until the storm blows over. Four Alternatives to Stocks Whether a period of market volatility is a wise time to sell stocks is another discussion entirely, having to do with your asset allocation strategy. But for investors who have already decided to seek safe harbor from the stock market’s wild ride, here are four popular alternatives — and what you should know about their risk and returns. Bonds. The first thing you have to do is make the distinction between corporate, municipal, and government bonds. If you don’t like stocks, it would be hard to make the case for corporate bonds. As for municipal bonds, given the poor fiscal condition of many municipalities, you may find yourself running headlong into one of the same risks — a debt crisis — that has been plaguing the stock market. US Treasury bonds offer security over the long haul, but prices may vary between now and their maturity dates. Also, fixed-coupon Treasury bonds may expose you to inflation risk. Gold, oil, and other commodities. Keep in mind that commodities are alternatives to stocks, but that doesn’t make them any safer. Also, many commodities are economically sensitive, so you may still be exposed to some of the same risks you were when in stocks. Certificates of deposit. CD rates can be higher than savings account rates or money market rates if you stretch out the maturity dates, but committing to a CD term could expose you to inflation risk. That is, if prices rise when your money is in a CD, you’ll be losing ground to inflation. Also, a longer-term CD may limit your flexibility for getting back into the stock market if you identify a hot buy opportunity. Savings or money market accounts. Savings account and money market rates are both on the low side on average, but you can improve your bank rates by shopping around. As long as you stay within FDIC insurance limits, these represent a truly safe harbor, along with just enough flexibility to allow you to make your next move when you want to. The original article can be found at MoneyRates.com.

Read the full article →

Video: Rendino Sees Next 4 Months as `Pretty Good’ for Equities: Video

September 13, 2010

Sept. 13 (Bloomberg) — Kevin Rendino, a portfolio manager at BlackRock Inc., talks about the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision’s new capital requirements for banks and the prospects for the stock market. Rendino speaks with Betty Liu on Bloomberg Television’s “In the Loop.” (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Video: Minerd Says Treasury Yields Could Fall Below 2% in 2010: Video

September 8, 2010

Sept. 8 (Bloomberg) — Scott Minerd, chief investment officer at Guggenheim Partners, speaks about the outlook for the U.S. economy and 10-year Treasury notes. Minerd talks with Pimm Fox on Bloomberg Television’s “Taking Stock”. (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Video: Tyrangiel Discusses Foxconn, Terry Gou: Video (Correct)

September 8, 2010

(Corrects to remove the inaccurate company name and information on suicides.) Sept. 8 (Bloomberg) — Bloomberg Businessweek editor Josh Tyrangiel talks about the magazine’s interview with Foxconn Technology Group Chairman Terry Gou. Tyrangiel spoke yesterday with Pimm Fox on Bloomberg Television’s “Taking Stock”. (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Video: Tyrangiel Discusses Outlook for Foxconn, Terry Gou: Video

September 7, 2010

Sept. 7 (Bloomberg) — Bloomberg Businessweek editor Josh Tyrangiel talks about the magazine’s interview with Foxconn Technology Group Chairman Terry Gou and the spate of suicides at the company. Tyrangiel speaks with Pimm Fox on Bloomberg Television’s “Taking Stock”. (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Video: Kenneth Fisher Discusses Stock Picks, Investor Sentiment: Video

September 7, 2010

Sept. 7 (Bloomberg) — Kenneth Fisher, chief executive officer of Fisher Investments Inc., talks about his equity investment strategy and some of his stock picks. Fisher speaks with Margaret Brennan on Bloomberg Television’s “InBusiness.” (This report is an excerpt of the full interview. Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

September Stock Slump Coming? Investors Brace For A Traditionally Bad Month

August 31, 2010

CHICAGO — The economy is weakening, home sales are plunging and stocks are on a long slide. Now comes something even scarier for investors – the beginning of what is traditionally the worst month in the market. Could stocks be headed for another September swoon? “If history is any guide, for it’s never gospel, we may be in for another rough ride,” says Sam Stovall, chief investment strategist at Standard & Poor’s. Mutual fund managers tend to clean house after Labor Day, taking profits on winning stocks and weeding out portfolios before putting out the rosiest possible end-of-quarter reports for their clients. Workers coming back from summer breaks are also inclined to sell stocks as they get their financial affairs in order. Any festering issues with the economy or stocks during the summer, when trading volume is light, tend to get put off until fall. The result: September is usually a dog of a month for the market. It typically starts with solid market increases, then tails off, says Jeffrey Hirsch, editor-in-chief of the Stock Trader’s Almanac. “There’s just a general selling bias in the month of September,” he says. Four times in the past decade alone, the S&P 500 shed at least 5 percent in September. The average September decline since 1950 is 0.6 percent, according to the Stock Trader’s Almanac. February is the next worst, with an average 0.2 percent loss, and December and November are the best, averaging 1.6 percent gains. Of course, investors haven’t forgotten that the financial world collapsed in September just two years ago. And the Sept. 11 attacks, which delivered a devastating blow to the stock market, remain a painful memory. This year, there’s a lot to frown about. The S&P 500 index is down 14 percent from its high in April, and was down 5 percent for the month of August. Stocks have fallen because the economic recovery is faltering. The economy has slowed to anemic growth, home sales the last three months are the worst on record, consumer spending is lackluster and unemployment is stuck near 10 percent. The slew of weak economic data sapped the market of what little midsummer momentum it had and further shook the confidence of already wary investors. “I don’t think it would take a whole lot to get investors to start selling and consumers to start pulling back again,” says Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody’s Economy.com. “The collective psyche is on edge.” Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke said last week that the central bank is ready to take additional steps to boost the economy, including buying more debt or mortgage securities in order to keep interest rates low. But with the benchmark interest rate already near zero, any Fed action is unlikely to provide the oomph of past measures. Congress doesn’t appear to have an appetite for another stimulus package. Also hanging over the market is an air of heightened uncertainty because the November elections will determine which party controls Congress for the next two years. The S&P 500 has declined an average 1.7 percent in the September before midterm elections since 1930. Not that September isn’t bad enough already without all of this year’s baggage. It’s one of only three months, along with February and June, when stock prices typically decline. The uncertainty is a serious consideration for financial advisers such as Dominick Vetrano of Fountainhead Financial in Chicago. He holds off putting more money into stocks beginning in August, even though he thinks the September market dips are usually psychological. “There is little to gain by investing right before September and a lot to lose, so why risk it?” he says. “The September effect is well-documented.” Some experienced market participants, however, dismiss the significance of the trend and say it would be a mistake to try to time market decisions based on seasonal data from past years. Investors ultimately should be guided by the financial health of the companies they’re considering investing in. Hirsch, the market historian, agrees that history shouldn’t guide investing alone. After all, the S&P 500 advanced 4 percent last September. But he maintains that the numbers are too meaningful to dismiss entirely. “You should have a general idea of what the market’s rhythm and tendencies are,” he says. “And you respond accordingly.”

Read the full article →

September Stock Slump Coming? Investors Brace For A Traditionally Bad Month

August 31, 2010

CHICAGO — The economy is weakening, home sales are plunging and stocks are on a long slide. Now comes something even scarier for investors – the beginning of what is traditionally the worst month in the market. Could stocks be headed for another September swoon? “If history is any guide, for it’s never gospel, we may be in for another rough ride,” says Sam Stovall, chief investment strategist at Standard & Poor’s. Mutual fund managers tend to clean house after Labor Day, taking profits on winning stocks and weeding out portfolios before putting out the rosiest possible end-of-quarter reports for their clients. Workers coming back from summer breaks are also inclined to sell stocks as they get their financial affairs in order. Any festering issues with the economy or stocks during the summer, when trading volume is light, tend to get put off until fall. The result: September is usually a dog of a month for the market. It typically starts with solid market increases, then tails off, says Jeffrey Hirsch, editor-in-chief of the Stock Trader’s Almanac. “There’s just a general selling bias in the month of September,” he says. Four times in the past decade alone, the S&P 500 shed at least 5 percent in September. The average September decline since 1950 is 0.6 percent, according to the Stock Trader’s Almanac. February is the next worst, with an average 0.2 percent loss, and December and November are the best, averaging 1.6 percent gains. Of course, investors haven’t forgotten that the financial world collapsed in September just two years ago. And the Sept. 11 attacks, which delivered a devastating blow to the stock market, remain a painful memory. This year, there’s a lot to frown about. The S&P 500 index is down 14 percent from its high in April, and was down 5 percent for the month of August. Stocks have fallen because the economic recovery is faltering. The economy has slowed to anemic growth, home sales the last three months are the worst on record, consumer spending is lackluster and unemployment is stuck near 10 percent. The slew of weak economic data sapped the market of what little midsummer momentum it had and further shook the confidence of already wary investors. “I don’t think it would take a whole lot to get investors to start selling and consumers to start pulling back again,” says Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody’s Economy.com. “The collective psyche is on edge.” Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke said last week that the central bank is ready to take additional steps to boost the economy, including buying more debt or mortgage securities in order to keep interest rates low. But with the benchmark interest rate already near zero, any Fed action is unlikely to provide the oomph of past measures. Congress doesn’t appear to have an appetite for another stimulus package. Also hanging over the market is an air of heightened uncertainty because the November elections will determine which party controls Congress for the next two years. The S&P 500 has declined an average 1.7 percent in the September before midterm elections since 1930. Not that September isn’t bad enough already without all of this year’s baggage. It’s one of only three months, along with February and June, when stock prices typically decline. The uncertainty is a serious consideration for financial advisers such as Dominick Vetrano of Fountainhead Financial in Chicago. He holds off putting more money into stocks beginning in August, even though he thinks the September market dips are usually psychological. “There is little to gain by investing right before September and a lot to lose, so why risk it?” he says. “The September effect is well-documented.” Some experienced market participants, however, dismiss the significance of the trend and say it would be a mistake to try to time market decisions based on seasonal data from past years. Investors ultimately should be guided by the financial health of the companies they’re considering investing in. Hirsch, the market historian, agrees that history shouldn’t guide investing alone. After all, the S&P 500 advanced 4 percent last September. But he maintains that the numbers are too meaningful to dismiss entirely. “You should have a general idea of what the market’s rhythm and tendencies are,” he says. “And you respond accordingly.”

Read the full article →

Despite Reform, Banks Have Room For Risky Deals

August 25, 2010

When Congress passed a new financial regulation bill last month, it sought to prevent federally insured banks from making speculative bets using their own money. But that will not stop banks from making bets that some critics deem risky, even as the rules go into effect over the next few years. That is because many such bets — on the direction of the stock market or the price of coal, for example — are done on behalf of clients. So, the banks say, they will continue to be allowable despite the new restrictions.

Read the full article →

Video: Russ Koesterich Likes Large-Cap, Quality U.S. Companies: Video

August 23, 2010

Aug. 23 (Bloomberg) — Russ Koesterich, head of investment strategy for scientific active equities at BlackRock Inc., talks about the outlook for U.S. stocks, commodities and the economy. Koesterich speaks with Pimm Fox on Bloomberg Television’s “Taking Stock”. (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

In Striking Shift, Small Investors Flee Stock Market

August 22, 2010

Renewed economic uncertainty is testing Americans’ generation-long love affair with the stock market. Investors withdrew a staggering $33.12 billion from domestic stock market mutual funds in the first seven months of this year, according to the Investment Company Institute, the mutual fund industry trade group. Now many are choosing investments they deem safer, like bonds.

Read the full article →

‘Vice Fund’ Touts Recession-Proof Portfolio: ‘Booze, Bets, Bombs and Butts’

August 19, 2010

BOSTON — So much for virtue. Sin is in. That’s according to a mutual fund manager who’s finding plenty of investment opportunities in companies profiting from vices like smoking, drinking and gambling. Jeff Middleswart’s aptly named Vice Fund is beating the house in a down market. The Standard & Poor’s 500 index is down 1.9 percent this year. Yet stocks of cigarette makers are up an average 12 percent. The Vice Fund’s three biggest holdings are cigarette stocks: Philip Morris International Inc., Lorillard Inc. and Altria Group Inc. That explains why the fund is up 4.5 percent this year, ranking in the top 3 percent of its large-blend fund peers according to Morningstar. Defense contractors – another fund mainstay – are up an average 12 percent. Some group contractors in this category because their profits are tied to the escalation of conflicts. Alcoholic beverages? Up 6 percent. Vice is the lifeblood of a fund that’s a counterpoint to investment products touting themselves as socially responsible because they favor companies ostensibly benefiting society. This year, those stocks aren’t doing anything special. An index of socially responsible stocks, the MSCI USA Large Cap ESG, is down 1.7 percent. Vice Fund (VICEX) is rebounding from lagging returns in 2008 and 2009. Its turnaround would be even bigger if not for the average 30 percent decline for stocks of gaming companies. They’re struggling to cut hefty debt loads, a legacy from years of casino-building. Vice is the only fund explicitly focusing on sin stocks. Its portfolio of about 30 stocks is divided almost equally among cigarettes, alcohol, gaming and casinos, and defense – industries that typically hold up well in tough times. Although such a small portfolio can lead to volatility, the Vice Fund offsets that risk by emphasizing steady dividend-paying stocks. Middleswart replaced previous manager Charles Norton in February, after more than two decades as an investment analyst. The 40-year-old Dallas resident manages the eight-year-old fund for USA Mutual Funds, along with the smaller Generation Wave Growth Fund (GWGFX), which invests in stocks expected to profit from spending by baby boomers. Both were founded by Dan Ahrens, who left in 2005 after writing a book that explained his investment thesis. Its title: “Investing in Vice: The Recession-Proof Portfolio of Booze, Bets, Bombs, and Butts.” Here are excerpts from a recent interview with Middleswart about the Vice fund, and this year’s standout performance for many sin stocks: Q: Were you at all reluctant to manage the fund because of its focus on sin stocks? A: Not at all. I’ve always been a contrarian, and I’ve always looked for deep value stocks. If you listed everything you look for in a stock – companies with growing cash flow, that pay dividends and buy back shares and have clean balance sheets – you’d find a huge list of sin stocks. Yet people look at them and say, “I don’t want to own that, it’s tobacco, it’s an industry that’s going out of business.” Or they say, “I don’t want to own an alcohol stock.” These are stocks with the (financial) characteristics everybody says they want, and we’re getting them at a discount. That’s because certain people don’t want to own them. Q: Is there anything unique about the types of investors drawn to the Vice fund? A: For the most part, they’re individual investors. We have a higher-than-average percentage of people in the military who own the fund. Q: Your top holding, at about 12 percent of the fund’s assets, is Philip Morris. What do you find attractive about one of the world’s largest tobacco companies? A: Philip Morris has international tobacco exposure, which is still growing. In emerging markets, people are smoking more, and they’re going for brand name cigarettes. With this stock, you’re getting a dividend yield of nearly 5 percent, and they also have enough cash flow to buy back shares. You’ve got a company that doesn’t have to spend a fortune every year remaking itself, in terms of research and development, and signing new distribution agreements. Q: Another one of your favorites is Anheuser-Busch InBev SA, the product of a 2008 deal pairing U.S. and Belgian brewers. What do you like about the stock? A: The company is paying down debt rapidly, and it has solid cash flow growth. The way they’re going, they’ll eventually start rewarding shareholders with a bigger dividend, perhaps in the 5 to 6 percent range. It’s also got a big presence in growing markets like Brazil. I think the stock will have a decent pop over the next year and a half, and at that point it will become a cash machine for shareholders. Q: Why have you cut back on gaming stocks? A: Because gaming companies hold so much debt, and their U.S. growth prospects are limited. You’ve got lots of city and state governments saying they want to get into gaming in a bigger way. So they’re authorizing new casinos. But that’s essentially dividing up the same dollars. As you divide the pot among more players, you will see a lower return. Q: Your fund owns stocks in two makers of game terminals: Bally Technologies Inc. and International Game Technology. Why do you prefer these to casino stocks? A: As long as casinos expand, they’ll have to buy new slot machines and video lottery terminals. These companies will benefit. They don’t have a ton of debt the way many casinos do. Also, the casinos in Las Vegas used to be on a 4- to 5-year replacement cycle for new machines. But because of all the debt troubles they had in 2008 and 2009, a lot of those replacements have been postponed. There’s a lot of pent-up demand. Q: Do you spend your free time buying the stuff sin stocks peddle? A: I will have a glass of wine or drink a beer, but my gambling mostly consists of a couple days a year at the horse track. I’m more likely to go hiking or run on the treadmill than anything else. ______ Questions? E-mail investorinsight(at)ap.org.

Read the full article →

Robert Reich: Forget a Double-Dip, We’re Still in One Long Big Dipper

August 14, 2010

It’s nonsense to think of the economy heading downward again into a double-dip recession when most Americans never emerged from the first dip. We’re still in one long Big Dipper. More people are out of work today than were last year, counting everyone too discouraged even to look for work. The number of workers filing new claims for jobless benefits rose last week to the highest level since February. Not counting temporary census workers, a total of only 12,000 net new private and public jobs were created in July — when 125,000 are needed each month just to keep up with growth in the population of people who want and need to work. Not since the government began to measure the ups and downs of the business cycle has such a deep recession been followed by such anemic job growth. Jobs came back at a faster pace even in March 1933 after the economy started to “recover” from the depths of the Great Depression. Of course, that job growth didn’t last long. That recovery wasn’t really a recovery at all. The Great Depression continued. And that’s exactly my point. The Great Recession continues. Even investors are beginning to see reality. Starting in February the stock market rallied because corporate profits were rising briskly. Investors didn’t mind that profits were coming from payroll cuts, foreign sales, and gimmicks like share buy-backs — none of which could be sustained over the long term. But the rally died in April when investors began to see how paper-thin these profits actually were. And now the stock market is back to where it was at the start of the year. What to do? First, don’t listen to Wall Street and the Right. Forget the Neo-Hoover deficit hawks who say we have to cut government spending and trim upcoming deficits. We didn’t get into this mess and aren’t remaining in it because of budget deficits. In fact, the only way to reduce long-term deficits is to restore jobs and growth so government revenues rise and expenses like unemployment insurance drop. Ignore the government haters who say we have to void or delay upcoming regulations of Wall Street and big business. We got here because Wall Street went bonkers, the housing bubble burst, and the middle class couldn’t continue to spend because their health-care bills were soaring and their pay was stagnating. New regulations of Wall Street and big business are necessary to avoid a repeat. And don’t believe the supply-siders who say we have to extend the Bush tax cuts for the wealthy. Because the wealthy save rather than spend most of their incomes, extending their tax cut won’t do squat. And restoring their marginal tax rate to what it was under Bill Clinton won’t harm the economy. The Clinton years had the best sustained economy in American history. The central problem is lack of demand — and that’s what has to be tackled. Three of the four sources of demand have stopped working. (1) Consumers can’t and won’t buy because they’re still under a huge debt load, can’t get more credit, are afraid of losing their jobs (or already have), depend on two wage earners, at least one of whom is working part-time and pulling in less, or have to save. (2) Businesses won’t invest and spend on creating more jobs if they don’t see consumers willing to buy more. (3) Exports are stalled because the dollar is so high they cost too much, much of the rest of the world is still struggling with recession, and American firms can make things for sale abroad more cheaply abroad. That leaves only one remaining source of demand — government. We need a giant jobs program to hire people and put money in their pockets that they’ll spend and thereby create more jobs. Put ideology aside and recognize this fact. If it makes you more comfortable call it the National Defense Jobs Act. Call it the WPA. Call it Chopped Liver. Whatever, we have to get the great army of the unemployed and underemployed working again. Also: Put more money in consumer’s wallets by eliminating payroll taxes on the first $20K of income (and make it up by applying payroll taxes to incomes over $250K.) Also: Get more hiring by giving the states and locales interest-free loans — so they can rehire all the teachers, fire fighters, police officers, and sanitation workers they’ve fired — to be repaid when their state employment rates hit 5 percent or below. Also: Get more credit by having the Fed return to “quantitative easing” — expanding the money supply by purchasing mortgage-backed and other types of securities. If we let the deficit hawks and government haters dominate this debate, as they have, the Big Dipper will continue for years. The Great Depression lasted twelve. This post originally appeared at RobertReich.org .

Read the full article →

GM To File IPO Papers Next Week: AP Source

August 13, 2010

DETROIT — General Motors Co. is likely to file paperwork next week that describes its plan to sell shares to the public, a person familiar with the matter said Friday. The Detroit automaker had planned to file the papers on Friday but delayed the move to build distance between the filing and two major announcements it made on Thursday, said the person, who asked not to be identified because the company is not commenting publicly on the stock sale. GM said Thursday that CEO Edward Whitacre would step down as CEO Sept. 1 and be replaced by board member Daniel Akerson. It also reported a $1.3 billion second-quarter profit, its second-straight positive quarter. The board has not yet decided the date of the stock sale, the person said. However, experts say an initial public offering, or IPO, generally takes place three months after early paperwork is filed. GM got $50 billion in aid from taxpayers last year in exchange for 61 percent of the company. It repaid $6.7 billion that was considered a loan, and a stock sale would repay at least some of the remaining $43.3 billion. The person said GM’s board is weighing two desires: To shed government ownership quickly or wait longer and perhaps sell shares for a higher price if the automaker continues to do well. Whitacre has said that government ownership is hurting the company’s public image and sales. The Obama administration may be pressuring GM to sell shares soon to influence the November congressional elections and make the government’s controversial investment look smart, some analysts say. But Whitacre and the government have said GM is in charge of the IPO timing. ___ Associated Press Writer Ken Thomas in Washington contributed to this report.

Read the full article →

Video: Rosensweig Discusses Chegg, Textbook Rental Service: Video

August 12, 2010

Aug. 12 (Bloomberg) — Dan Rosensweig, chief executive officer of Chegg Inc., talks about the company’s textbook-rental service. He speaks with Pimm Fox on Bloomberg Television’s “Taking Stock”. (This is an excerpt from the full interview. Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Hewlett-Packard Shares DROP After CEO’s Forced Resignation

August 9, 2010

NEW YORK — Shares of Hewlett-Packard Co. tumbled Monday in the first trading day following CEO Mark Hurd’s sudden forced resignation Friday from the world’s largest technology company. Hurd stepped down from the post Friday following allegations that he falsified expense reports to conceal a relationship with a former contractor. HP’s shares fell $3.50, or 7.6 percent, to $42.81 in morning trading. The stock has lost more than 16 percent so far this year. Under Hurd, HP spent more than $20 billion on acquisitions and cut more than 40,000 jobs as he helped transform the company from a computer and printer maker dependent on ink sales for profits, to a well-rounded technology leader with a broad range of hardware and business services offerings. “We are frankly surprised and disappointed as Hurd was a strong leader and helped transform HP into a leading player,” said Kaufman Bros. analyst Shaw Wu in a note to investors. But, he added, HP’s “culture of winning” that Hurd helped shape will likely remain intact. Standard & Poor’s equity analyst Tom Smith, however, cut his investment recommendation on HP’s shares to “Buy” from “Strong Buy” and said the events add uncertainty to what’s been a “generally strong management story.” Janney Capital Markets analyst William Fearnley Jr. called the event a “stunner” but added he still believes in the stock. Even so, he said the events – and their sudden nature – “will cast a shadow over the story and the stock until a new CEO is chosen.”

Read the full article →

Video: Hynes Is `Bullish’ on U.S. Stocks in Near Term on Fed: Video

August 3, 2010

Aug. 3 (Bloomberg) — Dennis Hynes, chief market strategist at RW Pressprich & Co., talks about his investment strategy. Hynes, speaking with Pimm Fox on Bloomberg Television’s “Taking Stock,” also discusses the outlook for Federal Reserve policy and the U.S. stock and bond markets. (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Corporate Profits Are Up — But Mass Layoffs Have Helped

July 26, 2010

s companies this month report earnings for the second quarter, news of healthy profits has helped the stock market — the Standard & Poor’s 500-stock index is up 7 percent for July — but the source of those gains raises deep questions about the sustainability of the growth, as well as the fate of more than 14 million unemployed workers hoping to rejoin the work force as the economy recovers.

Read the full article →

Video: ProLogis’s Rakowich Sees Growth Opportunities Overseas: Video

July 22, 2010

July 22 (Bloomberg) — Walter Rakowich, chief executive officer of ProLogis, talks about opportunities for growth in Europe and Asia. ProLogis, the world’s largest owner of warehouses, today said earnings excluding items declined as falling demand for storage and distribution centers cut rents. Rakowich talks with Pimm Fox on Bloomberg’s “Taking Stock”. (This is an excerpt of the full report. Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Goldman Sachs 2Q Profit PLUNGES After SEC Charges

July 20, 2010

NEW YORK — Goldman Sachs Group Inc. said Tuesday its second-quarter net income dropped 83 percent to $453 million as its trading revenue fell and it booked a charge for its settlement of civil fraud charges with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The company’s revenue fell short of expectations and helped send the stock market falling. Goldman followed IBM Corp. and Texas Instruments Inc., which late Monday reported revenue that disappointed investors. Goldman’s stock dropped $1.89 to $143.79 in morning trading. Goldman took a $550 million charge to cover the cost of the settlement with the SEC that was announced last week. Earnings were also reduced by a one-time, $600 million charge tied to a new tax on bonuses in Britain. Excluding the one-time costs, net income after payment of dividends on preferred stock came to $2.75 per share, easily topping the $2.08 analysts forecast. Analysts typically exclude one-time charges from their estimates. Revenue fell 36 percent to $8.84 billion, short of the $8.94 billion predicted by analysts. The drop in revenue that a number of companies have reported is unnerving investors, who see it as a sign that the economic recovery is stalling. Banks, however, have their own revenue issues. Goldman’s trading revenue fell along with that of competitors including JPMorgan Chase & Co. and Bank of America Corp. that were hit hard by the spring plunge in the stock market. The drop in their revenue is adding to investors’ concerns about how new federal regulations will affect banks’ ability to profit from trading operations. David Viniar, Goldman’s chief financial officer, said during a conference call with reporters that there is no way yet to estimate the impact of the new regulations on revenue or profits. He said it could take more than a year as the detailed regulations are written before Goldman can assess their potential impact. New York-based Goldman, considered the strongest of the big investment banks, said its trading revenue dropped 39 percent to $6.55 billion. Goldman historically has had revenue from its bond, currency and commodities trading business that beat analysts’ forecasts. Now, those revenues are slipping as market volatility replaced the steady gains seen through most of 2009 and earlier this year. “This was really driven by a lack of activity by our clients,” Viniar said. Market volatility in the second quarter and concerns about financial regulation and mounting government debts in Europe kept many customers out of the market, he said. He warned that if customers remain nervous about athe markets, revenue and earnings could remain low in the coming quarters. When asked about potential third-quarter results, Viniar said, “I don’t make predictions.” He did say, however, that at this moment the “business environment is pretty slow.” The company said its revenue from trading of bonds, currencies and commodities fell 35 percent from a year earlier, while revenue from stock trading dropped 62 percent. During the first three months of 2009, the markets were soaring as they recovered from the financial crisis. But during this latest quarter, the Standard & Poor’s 500 stock index fell almost 12 percent. The cautiousness in the trading operations could be seen in a key measure known as value at risk, or VAR, which estimates the probability of losses at any given time in the market. Goldman’s average daily VAR dropped to $136 million in the second quarter from $245 million during the year-ago quarter. That means there was less money being invested because customers were taking fewer risks. With the added market turbulence, Goldman’s corporate customers were also issuing fewer bonds and shares of stock. That hurt the bank’s investment banking business during the quarter. Revenue in that unit fell 36 percent to $917 million. By taking a charge for the SEC settlement in the second quarter, Goldman was attempting to put the entire case behind it. The government had filed civil fraud charges in connection with Goldman’s sale of complex mortgage-related securities. Viniar reiterated that the SEC has completed a review of other mortgage-related transactions and does not plan to bring any charges against the bank or its employees for those deals. The $550 settlement includes $300 million in fines to be paid to the government and $250 million to compensate two European banks that lost money on their investments. The company reported that its costs for employee compensation and benefits came to 43 percent of its net revenues during the first half of the year. That compares with 49 percent in the first half of 2009. Goldman has been sharply criticized over the past year because of the huge bonuses it gave its employees while it accepted government bailout funds in 2008.

Read the full article →

Michael Pento: Are Stocks Currently Cheap?

July 14, 2010

Perma-shills have been claiming of late that the stock market is now trading at an enticing valuation. Their main evidence for this, as they are fond to claim, is that the forward Price to earnings multiple is 12 times next year’s earnings for the S&P 500. And, of course, a 12 PE multiple makes stocks cheap and the overall market a buy. But for investors who want to accurately assess that number, there are two issues they should be aware of. First, the PE ratio isn’t a good measure of the near term direction for the market. And second, nobody knows what the forward PE will actually be. Some pundits like to use that forward looking number because, when corporate earnings are projected to rise–as they almost always are–the PE ratio will look better. So let’s get into some real numbers that will help determine if the market is indeed cheap. For Q1 2010, the PE ratio on an operating trailing twelve month earnings basis for the S&P 500 is 15.5. Historically speaking, the average PE ratio on the S&P is about 15 times earnings. So therefore, if one isn’t promoting an ebullient guess as to what earnings will be in the future, the market is currently just fairly priced on a PE basis. Also, the PE ratio on an inflation adjusted average over the previous ten year period has ranged from 4.78 in December of 1920 to 44.2 in December of 1999. With such a wide range of valuations, it is difficult at best to make a case to buy or sell stocks solely on a PE basis. There are other factors like; the direction of inflation and interest rates that are necessary to consider when evaluating the PE ratio. Some market cheerleaders also like to use the inverse of the PE ratio called the earnings yield when comparing stock prices to bonds. They say; with the current earnings yield being 6.4% and the Ten year note yielding around 3% that stocks are a great value. Again, there are problems here too. Firstly, investors don’t earn the earnings yield as they do with dividends. And as mentioned, the earnings yield is merely the reciprocal of the PE ratio. The fact that the yields on government bonds are significantly below the earnings yield on stocks is merely an indication of the egregiously overvalued state of the U.S. debt market. Rather than pick one or two statistics like the forward PE ratio or the earnings yield to convey an opinion on stocks, here are several important facts that will help you decide the future direction of the market. A good metric to determine the valuation of stocks is the dividend yield. The current dividend yield on the S&P is a paltry 2.1%. The historical average dividend yield is a much greater 4.36%. The lowest dividend yield was 1.11%, which was reached in August of 2000. The highest dividend yield was 13. 84%, this was achieved in June 1932. Therefore, on a dividend yield basis, the market is currently significantly overpriced. To add salt in the wound of those low yielding stocks, tax rates on dividends are scheduled to increase significantly in 2011. Maybe that is the reason why all the cash sitting idle on corporate balance sheets isn’t being sent back to investors in the form of dividends? According to the Investment Company Institute, mutual fund cash levels are at a decade low. Cash levels as a percent of assets reached a cyclical high of 12% in 1991. Today, that ratio is less than 4%. With mutual funds already nearly fully invested where will the money come from to take stocks higher? The Fed’s balance sheet is at a record high $2.3 trillion. The unwinding of that balance sheet will send interest rates on their $1.1 trillion In Mortgage Backed Securities (MBS) soaring and will thus further damage the real estate market, stifle earnings growth and depress GDP growth. The Fed must also find buyers for all that MBS debt. This will crowd out investments that would have normally been made into stocks. Household debt and the Gross National debt have never been at or above 90% of GDP at the same time. For the first time in U.S. history, that is the case today. Along with the massive deleveraging that still lies ahead for both the public and private sectors, the Treasury must auction off close to $9 trillion in debt each year to cover our ballooning deficits and to satisfy rollovers. This will further crowd out investments that could have been better placed into the stock market. Once you view the real numbers on PE ratios and dividend yields it is hard to make an argument that stocks are cheap. And given the low levels of cash that exist at mutual funds and the crowding out of private investments that is taking place from the government, investors will find it difficult to assume the market can produce a sustainable rally of any real significance. The only disclaimer here is if the Fed embarks on another doubling of its balance sheet in an attempt to crush whatever life is left in the value of the U.S. dollar. Then, in that case the market may rally in nominal terms. But you had better own precious metals and the companies that pull the stuff out of the ground if you want to earn a positive return after inflation. Michael Pento is the Senior Market Strategist for Delta Global Advisors and a contributor to greenfaucet.com

Read the full article →

Is The Stock Market Too Volatile For Small Investors? (POLL)

July 12, 2010

Things are just too hairy in the stock market for thousands of small investors , the Wall Street Journal reports this morning. Faced with this May’s puzzling “flash crash” and an increasing skepticism of Wall Street, the role of the everyday investor is waning and the market “increasingly dominated by professionals,” the paper notes . The WSJ ‘s look into the fear gripping the stock market comes on the heels of a recent profile in the New York Times of Robert Prechter , an analyst who predicts the Dow will fall to 1,000 in the next five or six years. Prechter’s advice, though certainly unorthodox, has struck a chord with many investors — and the profile was widely circulated on the web. He suggests that investors should move into cash and suggests the Depression-like drop in equities will be the trading opportunity of a lifetime. If nothing else, Prechter’s approach seems to echo the sentiment of many households with 401Ks that are still reeling from this year’s wild stock market volatility. As Prechter put it, “Other people are advising people to stay naked. If I’m wrong, you’re not hurt. If they’re wrong, you’re dead. It’s pretty benign advice to opt for safety for a while.” Reuters blogger Felix Salmon suggested that everyday investors are quite sensible to flee the stock market’s new age of volatility. Despite what you may think about the “equity premium” — the idea that stocks will outperform other assets over the long run — Salmon argued in May that most investors just can’t stomach the ups and downs of a rocky story market. Buried in the WSJ’s portrayal of a handful of small investors have become disillusioned with stock market is one key notion. Stocks have gone through more than a temporary dip, they’ve deeply underperformed for a huge swath of retail investors. As the WSJ put it: “Stocks had developed an almost cult-like following in the 1980s and 1990s, when they were among the best investments available. But in the past decade, big U.S. stocks have had the worst performance of nine major investment classes tracked by investment research firm Morningstar.” What do you think?

Read the full article →

Henry Blodget: So, How’s Our Stock Market Recovery Doing?

July 12, 2010

After last week’s welcome rally, the S&P 500 is now 31% below its October 2007 peak. October 2007 was 33 months ago. So how is our stock market recovery doing relative to others in history? Not well. Most normal bear markets would have long since recovered and gone on to new highs. And given that our bear market is basically just a resumption of the bear market that started in 2000, our recovery is doing really not well. Of course, that’s because the market move since 2000 is a secular (long-term) bear market, not a cyclical (short-term) bear market. And based on the length and depth of other secular bear markets, as well as ongoing overvalation of our major indices, our secular bear market likely has a long way to go. How long do secular bear markets last? The last US secular bear market lasted from 1966 to 1982. Over that 16-year period, the DOW was flat in nominal terms. After adjusting for inflation, it got smashed. One of the worst secular bear markets in the US lasted from 1929 to about 1950. 20 years after the crash of 1929, the S&P briefly traded at one half its 1929 peak. And then there’s Japan. Japan’s NIKKEI peaked in 1989 at nearly 40,000. Now, 23 years later, it is trading around 10,000–one quarter of its value 23 years ago. So they’re not kidding when they talk about “stocks for the long run.” Will our DOW be trading at 3,000 in 2023–the equivalent to Japan’s horrorshow? Boy, we hope not. It’s possible–anything’s possible. But one thing we have going for us is that our market wasn’t quite as overvalued in 2000 as Japan’s was in 1989 (though it was extremely overvalued). Even today, though, our market is probably still at least 20% above fair value, and, over time, it will probably regress to (and below) the mean. So the long-term forecast calls for more pain. We can worry about that later, though. In the meantime, courtesy of chart-master Doug Short at dshort.com , have a look at our our market recovery as compared to other recoveries of the past century. Check out how our stock market recovery’s doing >

Read the full article →

Dan Dorfman: Make Room For Gloom and Doom

July 6, 2010

Given the recent onslaught of bum tidings — among them a weakening economy, renewed softness on the employment and housing fronts, the threat of spreading sovereign debt crises and a resumption of wicked stock market losses — gloom and doom are suddenly back in fashion. Accordingly, long-standing members of the end-of-the-world brigade are once again shouting from the rooftops, spouting one doomsday scenario after another. They’re easy enough to spot, given the extremity of their forecasts and the headlines that follow their grim projections. Among their more scary predictions making the rounds: Another Great Depression. A dive in the Dow to under 1,000. A new and impending wave of layoffs, with unemployment jumping to 15%. Another housing bust. Broadening sovereign debt crises. Agreed, it’s enough to give anyone a nervous breakdown. Still, given a bevy of worrisome and dangerous current events, the days are over when you can write off the fears of the bearish fraternity as pure hokum. However, since most of the current crop of princes of darkness, have been dead wrong probably 99% of the time, the $64,000 question is which, if any, of these doomsday scenarios should we believe? For credibility purposes, it makes sense to me to give a respectful hearing to someone who’s been right and zero in on the more reasonable and hotly debated issue that’s presently on everybody’s mind — the question of whether we will or wont have a double-dip recession. In this context, Michael Larson, associate editor of the Safe Money Report, a monthly newsletter out of Jupiter, Fla., seems like a fella whose views are especially worth hearing. Though by no means a household name, Larson should not be taken lightly since his prowess at the crystal ball is pretty darn impressive, having very early on called the recent credit, housing and employment crises and a sharp downturn in both the economy and the stock market, all of which is documented in the newsletter. His view is you don’t need a compass to ferret out a double-dip scenario, since a double-dip is already here, with all the attendant consequences for stocks, currencies, commodities and more. The signs are clear and ambiguous, he says; the economy is sinking yet again despite the biggest economic stimulus package in U.S. history, near-zero interest rates from the Federal Reserve, the biggest bank bailouts on record and the government’s takeover of such ailing companies as Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, General Motors and AIG. “The bought and paid for economic recovery is coming to a close,” he says, “and it’s time to deal with the very sobering new reality.” In arguing his case, Larson says the bright red warning lights of a double-dip recession are flashing everywhere. In particular, he points to a number of very recent warnings. Chief among them: New home sales imploded 33% in May to a seasonally adjusted rate of 330,000 units. That’s the lowest ever recorded. May retail sales dropped 1.2%, which was the first decline in eight months and much worse than economists had excpected. Durable goods orders tanked 1.1% in May, while housing construction skidded 10%. Consumer confidence plunged 52.9% in June. That was a huge drop from 62.7% in May and well below the 62.5% that economists had expected. The Dallas Federal Reserve’s gauge of manufacturing activity fell to -4% from 2.9%, while steep falls also occurred in Chicago, Philadelphia and Richmond. The Economic Cycle Research Institute’s weekly leading index is falling off a cliff. Its growth rate just fell to negative 6.9%, the worst reading in a year and far below the high of 28.5% positive in October. The last time this index plunged so much, a recession struck within a few months. To make matters worse, says Larson, the risk of a double-dip is occurring at the same time the sovereign debt crisis is gathering steam. Relating his bleak outlook to the stock market, he warns that what he sees is no recipe for a new bull market. Instead, he cautions, it’s the kind of toxic brew that could send equity prices back to their 2009 lows — all the way down to 6,470 in the Dow and 667 on the S&P 500. Currently, the two indexes are trading at 9,896 and 1,022, respectively. Meanwhile, the major media outlets tracking the market, continue to beat the drums for the purchase of so-called dirt cheap stocks that you’re crazy not to buy. My thought: Do they have their heads up their butts? What do you think? E-mail me at Dandordan@aol.com

Read the full article →

Palisades Petroleum (PINKSHEETS: PAPT) and MCP Group Close Deal

July 6, 2010

ANN ARBOR, MI–(Marketwire – July 6, 2010) –  MCP Group (“MCP”) President, Brad Hayosh states the following: “We are pleased to announce that we have closed our Stock Purchase Agreement with Palisades Petroleum ( PINKSHEETS : PAPT ). MCP is contributing its interest in a multifamily apartment complex in Monroe, Michigan initially and plans on bringing in a minimum of $50,000,000 worth of assets over the next 24 months as it effectuates its business plan.”

Read the full article →

Hilary Kramer: Is Tesla a Buy?

July 2, 2010

Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA), the first U.S. auto company IPO in 54 years, opened trading Wednesday at over-subscribed and at $17 a share. That would be enough of a victory, considering it was facing a $14-$16 consensus target. When you consider shares gapped up about +40% in their debut, it makes the Tesla IPO even more impressive. Add in the fact that the Dow lost over 250 points to hit a 2010 low, and you can really see that this stock is something special. Prior to the IPO, a lot of investors were talking about it being a bad time for Tesla to go public. I suppose you could still say that now, arguing that the TSLA public offering could have topped $25+ on a more hospitable day. But I’ve never been one to worry about timing when it comes to the stock market. It’s like complaining about the weather. There’s simply no point, because, complain as you may, you aren’t going to change the weather. You just dress accordingly and go on with your life. And in my opinion, Wednesday’s blow-out IPO performance proves Tesla is tailor-made for this kind of overcast environment on Wall Street. This electric vehicle company is a cleantech innovator — a stock I call a “game changer” that has what it takes to succeed despite a particularly volatile environment on Wall Street right now. See: Two other Cleantech Game Chaning Stocks to Buy I’ll admit the enthusiasm may have pushed TSLA up a bit too far too quickly, so I would buy on a dip below $23.50. But for investors who enter below that mark, I expect hefty returns in the months ahead no matter what antics we see from the broader market. Let me be clear, I normally don’t weigh in on small cap IPOs. But I do pride myself on singling out explosive small cap and mid cap innovators that are redefining their industry with a game-changing technology. That’s Tesla to a T. See: 7 Ways to Find Great Cheap Stocks Yes, I’ve read the research. I know Tesla has only sold a little over 1,000 cars thus far (GM sells more cars before lunch on a slow day!), and hasn’t made a penny of profit yet. But that is one of my favorite things about the company. These guys are hell-bent on growth — and this IPO was part of that plan by raising a boatload of cash. If they had simply stopped their research and development after creating their Roadster model, they’d be a successful little niche automaker and they’d probably be profitable custom making these $100,000 machines for an elite group of motorists. But the reason they are bleeding cash (as so many naysayers like to point out) is that they are instead racing forward on their first “mass-production” model, a $50,000 Model S due out late next year. This gives Tesla the potential to revolutionize the automobile marketplace — becoming a competitor of Ford (F) and Toyota (TM) instead of fighting with niche luxury brands like Lotus or Ferrari. The cynics will point to Tesla’s small scale and lack of automotive manufacturing expertise. After all, billionaire braniac Elon Musk had runaway success with PayPal but an internet startup is far less capital intensive than tooling up an automaker. But that lack of a production chain could also be seen as a plus by those who watched GM and Chrysler crippled by deep connections to the UAW or a deep sense of “automotive tradition.” See: The Worst IPOs of the Last Year And even if you doubt Tesla Chairman Elon Musk, there’s Sergey Brin and Larry Page (Google founders), and former EBay President Jeff Skoll steering this stock. If these guys are believers, then so am I! My hunch is that some time in mid-2011, as production on the Model S ramps up, and consumer frenzy reaches a fever pitch, these guys get bought out one of the larger legacy auto-companies who are trying to reinvent themselves. Perhaps it’ll even be Daimler or Toyota doing the buying (or even one of the aggressive new Chinese auto companies), but for certain, the purchase price would be at $75 a share or higher…representing a quick 450% profit in a classic American success story. See: Five Reasons Chrysler is still Doomed But even if I’m wrong about a take over, and these guys succeed in going it alone (and if anyone can do that, it’s Musk & Company), and all the buzz around this stock shows that it’s got a real shot at $40, and a quick 75% profit before year-end. That is why I am recommending all investors take a small stake in Tesla at $23.50 a share or less.

Read the full article →

Richard Barrington: Look Before You Leap: There Are Dangers Outside the Stock Market Too

June 30, 2010

“Stop the market–I want to get off.” No one could blame you if you felt that way. From the beginning of April through mid-June, the Dow Jones Industrial Average had 15 days in which it lost over 100 points each. It was scant comfort that there were also 11 days during that span in which the Dow gained over 100 points. That’s simply served to underscore the erratic behavior of the stock market in recent weeks, and kept investors focused more on risk than reward . When risk is on people’s minds, they start to look for safer harbors: calm places where they can put money until the stock market settles down. However, it is important to examine each alternative from a risk management standpoint–otherwise, you may not find the safety you’re looking for. Alternatives to the Stock Market Here are some examples of the pros and cons of popular alternatives to stocks: Gold and other commodities. When markets are ailing, gold is often sold as something as of a wonder drug. However, the gold bubble looks hauntingly like the dot-com bubble, the real estate bubble and the oil bubble that preceded it. Even some commentators who are bullish on gold describe it as a bubble that will get bigger before it pops, but playing chicken with the financial markets is no way to find a safe harbor. Commodities have their place, especially as an inflation hedge under current circumstances. But don’t overload on any one commodity, because commodities can be every bit as volatile as stocks. With everyone’s favorite commodity having already tripled in price over the past decade, don’t fall for fool’s gold . Bonds. Since bonds and stocks often (but by no means always) move in different directions, bonds are a popular safe haven when the stock market gets scary. Even so, pay particular attention to who is issuing the bond. Corporate bonds may expose you to the same economic risks as stocks. Municipal bonds are a minefield of budget difficulties. Concentrate on general obligation bonds of fiscally sound municipalities with growing tax bases. US Treasury bonds are the safest call, but with short-term yields under 20 basis points (0.20%), they don’t offer you much beyond safety. Longer-term Treasuries have higher yields, but their prices can fluctuate more, so there is no guarantee you’ll be able to sell them at a good price when you are ready to go back into stocks. Savings, money market accounts, and other deposit vehicles. As long as you stay within FDIC limits (currently $250,000 per depositor per institution, and it looks like that number might become permanent), deposit accounts offer true safety, and bank rates are a little bit higher than short-term Treasury rates. Still, even plain-vanilla deposit accounts require smart shopping. Even though long-term CD rates are likely to be the highest bank rates you see, in this situation you shouldn’t lock your money into a long-term CD unless the penalty for early withdrawal is negligible. Otherwise, you might not be able to get at your money when you are ready to get back into the stock market. As a general rule, money market rates tend to run higher than savings account rates , and they reward you especially well for opening a jumbo account ($100,000 or more). No matter which account type you choose, be sure to shop around–bank rates vary greatly from one institution to another and are subject to frequent changes. Going with the first savings account you see could very well mean you’re leaving free money on the table. Beyond the individual advantages and disadvantages of the above alternatives, keep in mind that making wholesale moves in and out of the market is also inherently risky. Market timing doesn’t work, but sensible, value-based asset allocation can be an effective investment approach. Try to make your moves in and out of the market incrementally, selling more when prices are up and buying more when prices are down. And, when you do pull money out of the market, make sure you are moving towards safety and liquidity rather than more risk. The original post can be found at MoneyRates.com: Look Before You Leap: There Are Dangers Outside of the Stock Market Too

Read the full article →

Video: Fleckenstein Discusses Market Outlook, Strategy: Video

June 30, 2010

June 30 (Bloomberg) — Bill Fleckenstein, president of Fleckenstein Capital in Seattle, talks about the outlook for the stock market and the possibility that it has lost its “discounting mechanism”.¶ Fleckenstein speaks with Betty Liu on Bloomberg Television’s “In the Loop.” (This is an excerpt of the full interview. Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

US Dollar Unmoved as Stock Markets Break Down

June 30, 2010

US Dollar Unmoved as Stock Markets Break Down

Read the full article →