the-legislation

Dec. 30 (Bloomberg) — Herbert Pardes, chief executive officer of New York Presbyterian Hospital, talks about the impact of President Barack Obama’s health-care law on the industry and the possibility the legislation will be repealed. Pardes, speaking with Carol Massar and Shannon Pettypiece on Bloomberg Television’s “Street Smart,” also discusses the need for more medical professionals. (Source: Bloomberg)

See the original post here:
Video: Pardes Says Health-Care Law May Cause Hospital Closings

{ 0 comments }

Sept. 29 (Bloomberg) — Nicholas Lardy, a senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics, discusses China currency legislation being considered by Congress. The House of Representatives may vote on the legislation, which would let U.S. companies bring trade complaints against importers of products that benefit from a weak Chinese currency, as soon as today. Lardy speaks from Washington with Betty Liu on Bloomberg Television’s “In the Loop.” (Source: Bloomberg)

See the original post:
Video: Lardy Calls U.S.’s China Currency Policy `A Risky Road’: Video

{ 0 comments }

Richard Shelby, GOP Leader, Wants To Overhaul Consumer Agency

September 20, 2010

WASHINGTON (Reuters) — Republicans will reopen the broad Wall Street reform law and overhaul the newly created consumer protection bureau if they regain control of Congress after the November elections, a leading lawmaker said on Monday. Richard Shelby, the top Republican on the powerful Senate Banking Committee, said lawmakers must revisit the legislation enacted this summer, which is the broadest overhaul of financial rules since the Great Depression.

Read the full article →

Financial Reform: Banks Already Looking To Profit From New Rules

July 16, 2010

So after spending many millions of dollars to lobby against the legislation, bankers are now turning to Plan B: Adapting to the rules and turning them to their advantage. Faced with new limits on fees associated with debit cards, for instance, Bank of America, Wells Fargo and others are imposing fees on checking accounts.

Read the full article →

Moody’s Credit Rating Cut Threatened By S&P

July 1, 2010

NEW YORK ( AP ) — Standard & Poor’s said it may cut its rating on the parent of rival ratings agency Moody’s Investors Service, because financial legislation could erode profits in the ratings industry and heighten legal risks. Standard & Poor’s placed Moody’s Corp.’s top ‘A-1′ short-term credit rating on watch for possible downgrade. S&P doesn’t anticipate lowering the company’s short-term rating more than one notch. S&P highlighted the risks to the ratings industry from financial overhaul legislation that is nearing final approval, particularly a provision expanding investors’ powers to sue ratings agencies. Investors could sue if they could show an agency “knowingly or recklessly failed to conduct a reasonable investigation of the factual elements relied upon by a credit rating agency’s rating methodology, or obtain a reasonable verification of those factual elements from independent third-party sources,” according to S&P. Ratings agencies have been criticized for giving high ratings to complex investments backed by risky mortgages whose values fell sharply when the housing market collapsed in 2007 and 2008. When homeowners defaulted, the agencies downgraded billions of dollars of investments at once. That helped spark the financial crisis. Lawmakers have accused the industry of having a conflict of interest because the agencies are paid by the banks whose investments they rate. S&P said it’s likely that new standard will increase Moody’s litigation costs. Moody’s management has said it plans to adapt its business practices to partially offset any potential new litigation risks from the legislation. But S&P said it believes Moody’s “may face higher operating costs, lower margins, and increases in litigation-related event risk, which would likely increase its business risk.” S&P also said the legislation may reduce investor demand for ratings, depending on whether the final legislation removes many or all references in federal regulations to internationally recognized ratings agencies like Moody’s, S&P and Fitch Ratings. The proposal would make many business transactions less reliant on rating agencies’ involvement. Moody’s shares fell 6 cents to close at $19.95 Wednesday. Meanwhile, shares of S&P’s parent, McGraw-Hill Cos., finished down $1.25, or more than 4 percent, at $28.14.

Read the full article →

Moodys: Banks’ Credit Ratings Won’t Change — At Least Not Immediately

June 26, 2010

New York — Moody’s Investors Service on Friday said the deal reached in Congress on the financial reform bill will not prompt it to immediately change its ratings on U.S. banks – but that action might come later. The ratings agency said it must first discern the effects of the legislation on the profit banks make in the credit industry. “Any rating actions that result from passage of legislation into law would be made following an assessment of the implications of the legislation,” Moody’s said. The ratings service said the legislation includes both positive and negative elements for banks’ stand-alone credit profiles. “Clarity with regard to the law’s content and an understanding of its likely implementation by regulators will be key to our ongoing analysis,” said Robert Young, managing director for Moody’s North American Bank Ratings. Young said the willingness of regulators to use the new resolution authority granted in the bill will influence its views, but regulators’ ability to use the authority will be restricted for some time. “We are therefore still of the opinion that senior debt and deposit ratings of systemically important banks in the U.S. will continue to benefit from some unusual level of support until the economic recovery is sustained, financial market health is restored, and the risks of attempting to unwind an interconnected institution are reduced,” added Young.

Read the full article →

Obama To Announce Regulatory Framework For New ‘Patient’s Bill Of Rights’: AP

June 21, 2010

WASHINGTON (Associated Press) — President Barack Obama on Tuesday will announce new health insurance benefits for consumers, marking the first 90 days since he signed landmark legislation to expand coverage. The announcement will follow a private meeting between administration officials, several state insurance commissioners, and CEOs of major insurance companies, amid concerns over continued premium hikes, the White House said. Obama is expected to attend at least part of the session. Consumers who buy their policies directly faced increases averaging 20 percent this year, according to a survey released Monday by the Kaiser Family Foundation. Although most Americans are covered on the job, about 14 million purchase insurance on the individual market and have the least bargaining power when it comes to costs. Obama’s announcement will cover regulations to implement a so-called patient’s bill of rights provided under the new law, said administration allies who were briefed in advance and spoke on condition of anonymity ahead of the official announcement. The consumer safeguards are limited steps that take effect this year. The main provisions of the legislation, including federal funding to help 32 million now uninsured get coverage, won’t come until 2014. The administration worries that escalating premiums will force more people drop their policies before the law is fully implemented. Obama foreshadowed parts of his announcement last week, telling a nurses’ group that the patient bill of rights would include the elimination of lifetime dollar limits on coverage, a particular problem for people dealing with hard-to-treat types of cancer. Insurance companies would be prohibited from canceling the policies of people who get sick, he added. And health plans would be required to provide consumers with simple and clear information about their choices and rights. The law also calls for other safeguards to be put in place this year, including allowing women to pick an ob-gyn specialist as their primary care doctor and forbidding insurers from denying coverage to children on account of a previous medical problem. Protection against insurance denials would extend to adults in 2014, when most Americans would be required to carry coverage. ___ Online: http://www.healthreform.gov

Read the full article →

Wall Street ‘Popping Champagne’ Over Watered-Down Financial Reform Bill (VIDEO)

May 25, 2010

“Maybe this is not going to be so bad.” That’s the way the New York Times ‘s heralded financial scribe Andrew Ross Sorkin put it when describing the stock market’s immediate reaction to the Senate passing a broad financial reform package last week. Sorkin, appearing on “Charlie Rose,” initially didn’t agree with his fellow guest Steven Pearlstein of the Washington Post , who argued that Wall Street was “popping Champagne” over the bill’s holes and omissions. But as you’ll see in this video compilation by HuffPost’s Ben Craw , the idea that Wall Street is essentially relieved by the current bill is shared by more than a few people. This news, which was also reported by the New York Times has been making its way around the airwaves of late. And as Congress wraps up the reconciliation of the House and Senate versions of the legislation, you’re likely to see more signs of outright relief. WATCH: Video produced by HuffPost’s Ben Craw

Read the full article →

Dylan Ratigan: Four Things Worth Supporting In Financial Reform Bill (VIDEO)

May 21, 2010

While the financial reform bill passed by the Senate does not address the root causes of the financial collapse, it’s not entirely worthless, according to Dylan Ratigan. During “The Dylan Ratigan Show” on Friday, Ratigan selected four of the most worthy features of the legislation and urged viewers to call on lawmakers to support them when the House and Senate meet to hash out the final language. Ratigan endorsed the following: Sen. Al Franken’s amendment regulating ratings agencies Called the “Restore Integrity To Credit Ratings,” Franken’s amendment would establish a regulatory board to select the credit rating firm that issues a security’s first credit rating. Sen. Susan Collins’ capital requirements Passed unanimously, Sen. Collins’ amendment would require regulators to take into account a financial institution’s risk when assessing capital requirements. Collins’ amendment would also set capital requirements for bank holding companies that would be as strict as those for insured banks, reports Reuters. Rep. Ron Paul’s partial ” Audit the Fed ” bill The bill, which ultimately became part of the House financial reform bill, calls for an audit of the Federal Reserve Board’s actions during the financial crisis. Federal Reserve Transparency Act. Sen. Blanche Lincoln’s ban on derivatives trading Lincoln’s amendment would force banks to spin-off their derivatives trading desks because of the role the financial products played in the financial crisis. WATCH: Visit msnbc.com for breaking news , world news , and news about the economy

Read the full article →

Frank Bars ICE Lobbyist Roberson From Contacting House Committee Members

April 1, 2010

By Matthew Leising April 1 (Bloomberg) — Representative Barney Frank, chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, said former senior adviser Peter Roberson is barred from lobbying his staff for as long as he leads the panel. Roberson, hired by Atlanta-based Intercontinental Exchange Inc. in February as vice president of government relations, would normally be prevented from contacting commmittee staff for one year under House ethics rules. “Several people have expressed criticism of the move by Peter Roberson from the staff of the Financial Services Committee to ICE, after he worked on the legislation relevant to derivatives,” Frank said today in a statement. “I completely agree with that criticism.” Bloomberg News first reported on Roberson’s move on March 29. To contact the reporter on this story: Matthew Leising in New York at mleising@bloomberg.net

Read the full article →

Frank Bars ICE Lobbyist Roberson From Contacting House Committee Members

April 1, 2010

By Matthew Leising April 1 (Bloomberg) — Representative Barney Frank, chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, said former senior adviser Peter Roberson is barred from lobbying his staff for as long as he leads the panel. Roberson, hired by Atlanta-based Intercontinental Exchange Inc. in February as vice president of government relations, would normally be prevented from contacting commmittee staff for one year under House ethics rules. “Several people have expressed criticism of the move by Peter Roberson from the staff of the Financial Services Committee to ICE, after he worked on the legislation relevant to derivatives,” Frank said today in a statement. “I completely agree with that criticism.” Bloomberg News first reported on Roberson’s move on March 29. To contact the reporter on this story: Matthew Leising in New York at mleising@bloomberg.net

Read the full article →

Medical Developers, Hospitals Early Winners as Health Care Overhaul Becomes Law

March 24, 2010

The uncertainty over the nation’s mammoth health-care overhaul has at least partially lifted for medical office developers, investors and hospital systems, who are now gauging the possible impacts of the legislation approved by the House and signed into…

Read the full article →

Health-Care Changes to Start Taking Effect This Year (Correct)

March 24, 2010

By Shannon Pettypiece and Alex Nussbaum (Corrects effective date in first paragraph. Story first moved March 23.) March 23 (Bloomberg) — Indoor tanning salons will charge customers a 10 percent tax beginning in July in one of the changes Americans will see as a result of the U.S. health-care overhaul signed into law by President Barack Obama . Insurers will be required by September to begin providing health coverage to kids with pre-existing illnesses and allow parents to keep children younger than 26 on their plans as the clock has begun ticking on many of the law’s provisions. Medicare recipients will receive a $250 rebate for prescription drugs when they reach a coverage gap called the donut hole if the Senate passes and the president signs companion legislation approved March 21 by the U.S. House. The $940 billion overhaul subsidizes coverage for uninsured Americans, financed by Medicare cuts to hospitals and fees or taxes on insurers, drugmakers, medical-device companies and Americans earning more than $200,000 a year. Many of the changes in the bill of more than 2,400 pages, such as requiring most people to have health insurance and employers to provide coverage, will take at least two years to go into effect. “Most of the major public policy changes embodied in the health care reform legislation will become effective only after the next presidential election in 2012,” said Maury Harris , an economist with UBS AG , said in a research report. High-Risk Pools Within 90 days, the law will provide immediate access to high-risk insurance plans for people who can’t get insurance because of a pre-existing medical problem, Harris said. These high-risk pools will be funded by $5 billion in federal grants. Companies led by Minnetonka, Minnesota-based UnitedHealth Group Inc. , the largest health insurer, will be banned within six months from dropping a person’s coverage because of severe illness and from limiting lifetime or annual benefits. Participants in Medicare, the U.S. government’s health coverage for those 65 and older, are expected get a $250 rebate toward prescription drugs once their benefits run out — a coverage gap know as the “doughnut hole.” The benefit is part of the package of amendments to the legislation now pending in the Senate. Drugmakers led by New York-based Pfizer Inc. will have to offer discounted drugs to Medicare recipients next year, according to an analysis of the legislation by the Kaiser Family Foundation, a nonprofit group based in Menlo Park, California In 2013, individuals whose annual income is more than $200,000 and couples making more than $250,000 will see an increase in Medicare payroll taxes. Those taxes will also be expanded to cover dividend, interest and other unearned income. Employer Coverage In 2014, employers with more than 50 employees will be required to provide health coverage and most people will be required to have health insurance, Harris said in his report. A tax on high-cost “Cadillac” policies won’t go into effect until 2018. The insurance industry also faces about $60 billion in additional fees under the health bill through 2018, and more beyond, though it was able to postpone the levy until 2014. By 2019, the bill is expected to have expanded health insurance coverage to 32 million people, according to UBS’s Harris. The U.S. Health and Human Services Department will have two years to set penalties on hospitals with high readmission rates and longer to test new payment systems for Franklin, Tennessee- based Community Health Systems Inc. , the largest U.S. chain, and its rivals. Financial Disclosure Insurers also will have to reveal how much of members’ premiums they spend on medical care, as opposed to executive salaries or other administrative costs. Next year, they’ll owe a rebate to customers if the insurers spend less than 80 percent on benefits for people in individual or small-group plans. Starting in 2014, states have their say. The legislation leaves it to them to set up and run the online marketplaces, known as exchanges, where customers will comparison-shop for coverage. Among other powers, the exchanges will be able to banish plans for premium increases deemed to be unjustified. The legislation also creates an Independent Payment Advisory Board to suggest cuts in spending by Medicare, the government health program for the elderly and disabled, that could threaten payments for drug and device-makers. Starting in 2014, the panel’s recommendations would take effect unless federal lawmakers substitute their own reductions. To contact the reporter on this story: Alex Nussbaum in New York anussbaum1@bloomberg.net ; Shannon Pettypiece in New York spettypiece@bloomberg.net

Read the full article →

Health-Care Overhaul Changes to Start Taking Effect This Year

March 23, 2010

By Shannon Pettypiece and Alex Nussbaum March 23 (Bloomberg) — Indoor tanning salons will charge customers a 10 percent tax beginning today in just one of the changes Americans will see as a result of the U.S. health-care overhaul signed into law by President Barack Obama . Insurers will be required by September to begin providing health coverage to kids with pre-existing illnesses and allow parents to keep children younger than 26 on their plans as the clock has begun ticking on many of the law’s provisions. Medicare recipients will receive a $250 rebate for prescription drugs when they reach a coverage gap called the donut hole if the Senate passes and the president signs companion legislation approved March 21 by the U.S. House. The $940 billion overhaul subsidizes coverage for uninsured Americans, financed by Medicare cuts to hospitals and fees or taxes on insurers, drugmakers, medical-device companies and Americans earning more than $200,000 a year. Many of the changes in the bill of more than 2,400 pages, such as requiring most people to have health insurance and employers to provide coverage, will take at least two years to go into effect. “Most of the major public policy changes embodied in the health care reform legislation will become effective only after the next presidential election in 2012,” said Maury Harris , an economist with UBS AG , said in a research report. High-Risk Pools Within 90 days, the law will provide immediate access to high-risk insurance plans for people who can’t get insurance because of a pre-existing medical problem, Harris said. These high-risk pools will be funded by $5 billion in federal grants. Companies led by Minnetonka, Minnesota-based UnitedHealth Group Inc. , the largest health insurer, will be banned within six months from dropping a person’s coverage because of severe illness and from limiting lifetime or annual benefits. Participants in Medicare, the U.S. government’s health coverage for those 65 and older, are expected get a $250 rebate toward prescription drugs once their benefits run out — a coverage gap know as the “doughnut hole.” The benefit is part of the package of amendments to the legislation now pending in the Senate. Drugmakers led by New York-based Pfizer Inc. will have to offer discounted drugs to Medicare recipients next year, according to an analysis of the legislation by the Kaiser Family Foundation, a nonprofit group based in Menlo Park, California In 2013, individuals whose annual income is more than $200,000 and couples making more than $250,000 will see an increase in Medicare payroll taxes. Those taxes will also be expanded to cover dividend, interest and other unearned income. Employer Coverage In 2014, employers with more than 50 employees will be required to provide health coverage and most people will be required to have health insurance, Harris said in his report. A tax on high-cost “Cadillac” policies won’t go into effect until 2018. The insurance industry also faces about $60 billion in additional fees under the health bill through 2018, and more beyond, though it was able to postpone the levy until 2014. By 2019, the bill is expected to have expanded health insurance coverage to 32 million people, according to UBS’s Harris. The U.S. Health and Human Services Department will have two years to set penalties on hospitals with high readmission rates and longer to test new payment systems for Franklin, Tennessee- based Community Health Systems Inc. , the largest U.S. chain, and its rivals. Financial Disclosure Insurers also will have to reveal how much of members’ premiums they spend on medical care, as opposed to executive salaries or other administrative costs. Next year, they’ll owe a rebate to customers if the insurers spend less than 80 percent on benefits for people in individual or small-group plans. Starting in 2014, states have their say. The legislation leaves it to them to set up and run the online marketplaces, known as exchanges, where customers will comparison-shop for coverage. Among other powers, the exchanges will be able to banish plans for premium increases deemed to be unjustified. The legislation also creates an Independent Payment Advisory Board to suggest cuts in spending by Medicare, the government health program for the elderly and disabled, that could threaten payments for drug and device-makers. Starting in 2014, the panel’s recommendations would take effect unless federal lawmakers substitute their own reductions. To contact the reporter on this story: Alex Nussbaum in New York anussbaum1@bloomberg.net ; Shannon Pettypiece in New York spettypiece@bloomberg.net

Read the full article →

Stupak, House Democrats Reach Agreement on Abortion Issue in Health Bill

March 21, 2010

By Laura Litvan and Julianna Goldman March 21 (Bloomberg) — Representative Bart Stupak said he and other House Democrats have reached an agreement that he said would ensure that no federal funds will be used to finance abortions in health-care legislation. Stupak, of Michigan, had complained that language restricting federal funds for abortion in Senate legislation the House will vote on today was too weak. The agreement calls for President Barack Obama to sign an executive order stating that federal funds can’t be used for abortion, White House communications director Dan Pfeiffer said. Obama will sign the measure once the bill is passed, Pfeiffer said. “While the legislation as written maintains current law, the executive order provides additional safeguards to ensure that the status quo is upheld and enforced, and that the health care legislation’s restrictions against the public funding of abortions cannot be circumvented,” Pfeiffer said in a statement. To contact the reporter on this story: Laura Litvan in Washington at llitvan@bloomberg.net

Read the full article →

House Leaders Work to Defuse 11th-Hour Fight Over Medicare Reimbursements

March 19, 2010

By Nicole Gaouette and James Rowley March 19 (Bloomberg) — House Democratic leaders worked to defuse an 11th-hour rebellion by more than a dozen lawmakers angry that hard-fought increases in Medicare reimbursements for local hospitals were removed from health-care legislation. The lawmakers’ concern arose after House leaders released the latest version of legislation to overhaul the U.S. health- care system. House leaders are pushing for a March 21 vote on changes to Senate-passed legislation. Left unchanged is Senate language that these lawmakers say won’t go far enough to ease geographic disparities in Medicare reimbursements . Such a provision was included in House-passed legislation to win votes of lawmakers who say hospitals in their districts would be paid less than other facilities for the same services. “My state is getting screwed,” said Representative Peter DeFazio , an Oregon Democrat. “They have to fix it. I’m a ‘no’ vote unless they fix it.” Lawmakers representing health-care providers in 17 states are affected by the change, he said. As House leaders corral votes in favor of the legislation, DeFazio said “there are a number of people who may be miscounted at this time.” House leaders, trying to round up 216 votes to pass revisions to the Senate bill, are working to craft a provision on the Medicare payments that would survive parliamentary challenges by Republicans when the measure is debated in the Senate. ‘Legitimate Concern’ Asked about the issue at a press conference, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi told reporters “we do want the language to be closer” to the House measure, which satisfied lawmakers “who have a legitimate concern about the reimbursement to their states being unfair.” “We are working on that language,” the speaker said. A provision to change the Senate version was removed from the legislation yesterday, shortly before House leaders unveiled changes, DeFazio said. It was deleted because Senate staff members told House leaders it might run afoul of parliamentary challenges by Senate Republicans, DeFazio said. To pass muster, every provision must reduce the deficit under budget reconciliation procedures being deployed to enact the most comprehensive redesign of the health-care system in five decades. Wisconsin Democrat Ron Kind said many lawmakers are upset that the geographic-disparities provision was removed from the legislation. ‘Wait and See’ “A lot of votes are hinging on it,” he said. Kind said he was “going to wait and see” whether he would support the measure. Lawmakers are trying to rewrite the provision to win a favorable ruling from the Senate parliamentarian. Without changes to reimbursements to hospitals and other providers “it’s going to be hard to justify” voting for the legislation, said Nevada Democrat Shelley Berkley , who planned to meet today with Pelosi to express her concerns about the legislation. “Every one of my hospitals is operating in the red” and the legislation as written “is not going to turn that around,” she said. Ohio Democrat Marcy Kaptur told reporters this week that she is concerned about differences between hospital reimbursements in her Toledo-area district and more affluent Ann Arbor, Michigan, about an hour’s drive to the north. Toledo-area hospitals “get hurt,” by the reimbursement disparity, “including one which does an enormous amount of charity care,” she said. “This bill, I don’t think, fixes that,” Kaptur said. “That’s a big issue for me.” To contact the reporters on this story: Nicole Gaouette in Washington at ngaouette@bloomberg.net ; James Rowley in Washington at jarowley@bloomberg.net

Read the full article →

Dodd: Financial Reform Bill At Impasse

February 5, 2010

WASHINGTON — Senate Banking Committee Chairman Christopher Dodd says he has reached an impasse on bipartisan negotiations over a financial regulation bill. He says he intends to propose his own bill later this month. Dodd, a Connecticut Democrat, has been unable to find common ground over consumer protections with Sen. Richard Shelby of Alabama, the top Republican on the Banking Committee. Nonetheless, Dodd said he will incorporate provisions into the regulatory bill that have been worked out by other bipartisan teams on the panel. The deadlock is a setback for the legislation. Dodd needs Republican support to win passage of the legislation in the Senate. It is unclear at this point whether adding other regulatory measures supported by Republicans will guarantee him GOP votes. Dodd’s full statement below: Last night, Senator Shelby assured me that he is still committed to finding a consensus on Financial Reform, but for now we have reached an impasse. While I still hope that we will ultimately have a consensus package, it is time to move the process forward. I have instructed my staff to begin drafting legislation to present to the committee later this month. I appreciate the good work that has been done to this point by Senator Shelby and the other Banking Committee members who have worked so hard in this process. Over the past two months we have had productive bi-partisan negotiations in a number of areas and I intend to incorporate many of those agreements in this new proposal. Information from The Associated Press was used in this report.

Read the full article →

Financial Reform Bill: Bankers Get $4 Trillion Gift From Barney Frank: David Reilly

December 30, 2009

The reading was especially painful since this reform sausage is stuffed with more gristle than meat. At least, that is, if you are a taxpayer hoping the bailout train is coming to a halt. If you’re a banker, the bill is tastier. While banks opposed the legislation, they should cheer for its passage by the full Congress in the New Year: There are huge giveaways insuring the government will again rescue banks and Wall Street if the need arises.

Read the full article →

Glass-Steagall Renewal Sought by McCain, Cantwell to Avert Future Bailouts

December 16, 2009

By Alison Vekshin Dec. 16 (Bloomberg) — U.S. Senators John McCain and Maria Cantwell unveiled legislation today to reinstate the Depression- era Glass-Steagall Act that separated commercial and investment banking, to rein in the size of Wall Street firms in response to the financial crisis. “Under our proposal, too big to fail banks would be forced to return to the business of conventional banking, leaving the task of risk-taking or management to others,” McCain, an Arizona Republican, said at a Washington news conference. The bill would increase the number of “smaller, more aggressive companies that are not so big that their failure would bring the entire economy down,” he said. McCain and Cantwell, a Washington Democrat, are the latest lawmakers to propose reinstating the 1933 law, repealed a decade ago by the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act that led to a rise in conglomerates including Citigroup Inc. active in retail banking, insurance and proprietary trading. Under the legislation, financial firms operating both commercial banks and investment houses will have to make a decision on whether to focus on commercial banking or investment banking. Cantwell said the companies would get a year from enactment to comply with the law. House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer told reporters yesterday a renewal of Glass-Steagall “is certainly under discussion” by House lawmakers. “Wall Street firms are about to post soaring end-of-the- year profits and bonuses, while Main Street suffers and wonders when they will have their recovery,” Cantwell said. To contact the reporter on this story: Alison Vekshin in Washington at avekshin@bloomberg.net .

Read the full article →

Derivatives Lobby Hooks Up With New Dems To Water Down Reform Bill

October 9, 2009

Bloomberg News reports Friday morning that the derivatives lobby has put a bug in the ear of the New Democrat Coalition . JPMorgan Chase, Goldman Sachs, and Credit Suisse lobbied New Dem Reps. Mike McMahon (D-N.Y.) and Melissa Bean (D-Ill.) “to expand the ways the legislation allows dealers and major investors to trade the contracts,” according to Bloomberg . The result of the banks’ lobbying effort seems to be draft legislation that could actually exempt most financial firms from a wide swath of derivatives regulations. The discussion draft put forth by House Financial Services Committee chairman Barney Frank (D-Mass.), Bloomberg reported Thursday , would not regulate derivatives used by financial companies for the rather ambiguous purpose of “risk management.” (Check out HuffPost’s Jason Linkins’ take on the wild world of derivatives here .) At stake in the legislation could be a significant portion of the tens of billions of dollars that commercial banks make in the largely unregulated derivatives market each year. U.S. banks made $5.2 billion in the second quarter of 2009, a 225 percent increase from the same period last year. New Democrats praised Frank last week for the bill. New Dem chairman Rep. Joe Crowley (D-N.Y.) said in a statement, “I congratulate my fellow New Dem Members, 15 of whom serve on the Financial Services Committee, for their work with Chairman Frank to reform our financial system to provide greater protections for American consumers and businesses while ensuring continued access to valuable tools to manage risk.” At a Wednesday hearing on the legislation, administration officials called Frank’s plan too weak. Gary Gensler, the chairman of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, said the bill would allow financial firms too many exemptions from regulation. “We stay particularly vulnerable because we haven’t filled the [regulatory] gaps,” Gensler told the Huffington Post Investigative Fund in an exclusive video interview this week. Derivatives, despite their role in the near-collapse of the entire world economy, were not important enough for a some members of the House agriculture committee to sit through a hearing on their regulation in September. Instead, Reps. Blaine Luetkemeyer (R-Mo.) and Kathy Dahlkemper (D-Pa.) skipped out for fundraisers . Check out Bloomberg’s awesome story here .

Read the full article →

Pelosi Says House Leaders Considering Tax on `Cadillac’ Health-Care Plans

September 25, 2009

By James Rowley Sept. 25 (Bloomberg) — House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said Democratic leaders are considering following a Senate panel’s lead and taxing the most-expensive health-insurance plans to help pay for legislation to overhaul the medical-care system. The excise tax on so-called Cadillac health plans is part of legislation being considered by the Senate Finance Committee. “There are other provisions in the Senate bill that bend the curve that might be more palatable” to House members, Pelosi said during a break in a meeting of Democratic leaders to discuss what will go into the measure to be presented to the full House. “We’ll see.” One idea under consideration would be to scale back the so- called millionaire’s tax, a levy on the highest-income earners that the House Ways and Means Committee included in its version of the legislation, and make up some of the revenue with an excise tax on Cadillac plans, according to two leadership aides who briefed reporters. Pelosi said no final decision will be made until the Congressional Budget Office reviews several scenarios it was asked to look at and delivers cost estimates. To contact the reporter on this story: James Rowley in Washington at jrowley@bloomberg.net

Read the full article →

Telstra Told to Split Into Network, Retail Units to Bolster Competition

September 14, 2009

By Robert Fenner Sept. 15 (Bloomberg) — Telstra Corp., Australia’s largest telephone company, should split into separate businesses to promote competition in the nation’s telecommunications market. “It is the government’s clear desire for Telstra to structurally separate on a voluntary and cooperative basis,” Communications Minister Stephen Conroy said in an e-mailed statement today. If Telstra chooses not to break up its businesses, proposed changes in the legislation will impose a “strong functional separation framework” on Telstra, Conroy said in the statement. Separating Telstra’s wholesale and retail arms would increase transparency and foster competition, the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission said in June in a submission to the government. The legislation would prevent Telstra from acquiring more spectrum for wireless services while it “remains vertically integrated,” controls a fixed-line network and maintains a half share of Foxtel, Conroy said. Foxtel is Australia’s largest pay- television operator. Some of the conditions may be dropped if Telstra cooperates with the government, according to the statement. To contact the reporter on this story: Robert Fenner in Canberra rfenner@bloomberg.net

Read the full article →

House Panel Votes In Favor Of Restrictions On Executive Pay

July 28, 2009

WASHINGTON — A House panel voted Tuesday to prohibit financial firms from offering corporate pay packages that encourage executives to take big risks, going further than what President Barack Obama wanted to curb excessive salaries and bonuses on Wall Street. Lawmakers, including Republicans who opposed the proposal because they said it went too far, said they were under tremendous pressure from constituents. “Politically, it was very difficult for my members to stand up and fight this legislation,” said Rep.

Read the full article →