troubled-asset

Huffington Post…

Not many things have emerged from the quagmire of US Congress recently which have produced a truly pleasant surprise. But could the troubled asset relief programme – better known as Tarp – turn out to be one?

See original here:
Why TARP Proves America Can Emerge From Political Deadlock

Find our Weekly Commercial Real Estate, Private Equity and Fund Newsletters at www.WeeklyBrief.net

Huffington Post…

TWO and a half years ago, Congress passed the legislation that bailed out the country’s banks. The government has declared its mission accomplished, calling the program remarkably effective “by any objective measure.” On my last day as the special inspector general of the bailout program, I regret to say that I strongly disagree. The bank bailout, more formally called the Troubled Asset Relief Program, failed to meet some of its most important goals.

Read the original:
Ex-TARP Inspector General: Bailout ‘Failed’ To Meet Goals

Find our Weekly Commercial Real Estate, Private Equity and Fund Newsletters at www.WeeklyBrief.net

Keycorp Plans To Repay Entire TARP Bailout

March 18, 2011

(Reuters) – Keycorp said on Friday that it planned to repay $2.5 billion in U.S. government bailout funds, becoming one of the latest banks to shake off the lingering effects of the financial crisis. The Cleveland-based bank plans to raise $625 million through a common stock offering, which it will use to exit the U.S. Troubled Asset Relief Program. It also plans to start a separate senior debt offering. The Fed on Friday completed a second round of stress tests for the 19 largest U.S. banks. Keycorp was one of the three remaining banks among that group that had yet to repay its government bailout aid, received at the height of the financial crisis. SunTrust Banks Inc, the largest U.S. lender in the TARP program, also said on Friday it would repay its $4.9 billion in bailout aid. Keycorp also said on Friday the Fed had approved its plan to raise its quarterly dividend by 2 cents a share, to 3 cents, effective in the second quarter. (Reporting by Maria Aspan; Editing by Lisa Von Ahn) Copyright 2011 Thomson Reuters. Click for Restrictions .

Read the full article →

Bank Failures Rises To Twenty Five This Year

March 12, 2011

WASHINGTON — Regulators on Friday shut down small banks in Oklahoma and Wisconsin, lifting to 25 the number of U.S. bank failures this year after economic distress and soaring loan defaults brought down 157 banks in 2010. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. seized First National Bank of Davis, with one office in Davis, Okla., $90.2 million in assets and $68.3 million in deposits; and minority-owned Legacy Bank in Milwaukee, also with one office, with $190.4 million in assets and $183.3 million in deposits. Pauls Valley National Bank, based in Pauls Valley, Okla., agreed to assume all the deposits and $28.5 million of the loans and other assets of First National Bank of Davis. Chicago-based Seaway Bank and Trust Co. is assuming the deposits and $165.9 million of the assets of Legacy Bank. The FDIC will retain the rest of the failed banks’ assets for future sale. In addition, the FDIC and Seaway Bank and Trust agreed to share losses on $120 million of Legacy Bank’s assets. Legacy Bank received about $5.5 million in taxpayer funds in January 2009 under the government’s financial bailout program, and it repaid only about $355,000 in dividends, Treasury Department data show. It was the eighth bank that received funds under the Troubled Asset Relief Program to have failed or filed for bankruptcy. The eight banks are among 164 TARP recipients that have failed to pay quarterly dividends to Treasury, according to a tally by Linus Wilson, an assistant professor of finance at the University of Louisiana at Lafayette. The failure of First National Bank of Davis is expected to cost the deposit insurance fund $26.5 million; the failure of Legacy Bank is expected to cost $43.5 million. The 157 bank closures last year topped the 140 shuttered in 2009. It was the most in a year since the savings-and-loan crisis two decades ago. The FDIC has said that 2010 likely would be the peak for bank failures. Already this year the pace of closures has slowed: By this time last year, regulators had closed 30 banks. The 2009 failures cost the insurance fund about $36 billion. The failures last year cost around $21 billion, a lower price tag because the banks that failed in 2010 were smaller on average. Twenty-five banks failed in 2008, the year the financial crisis struck with force; only three were closed in 2007. The growing number of bank failures has sapped billions of dollars out of the deposit insurance fund. It fell into the red in 2009, and its deficit stood at $7.4 billion as of Dec. 31. The number of banks on the FDIC’s confidential “problem” list rose to 884 in the final quarter of last year from 860 three months earlier. The 884 troubled banks is the highest number since 1993, during the savings-and-loan crisis. The FDIC expects the cost of resolving failed banks to total around $52 billion from 2010 through 2014. Depositors’ money – insured up to $250,000 per account – is not at risk, with the FDIC backed by the government. That insurance cap was made permanent in the financial overhaul law enacted in July.

Read the full article →

Government Recovers Large Chunk Of TARP Money

March 8, 2011

New York (Reuters) – American International Group (AIG.N) repaid another $6.9 billion of its bailout on Tuesday, the U.S. Treasury said. With that payment, the Treasury said it has now recovered 70 percent of the $411 billion distributed under the crisis-era Troubled Asset Relief Program, or TARP. AIG paid the Treasury $6.6 billion from the proceeds of its sale of shares in insurer MetLife (MET.N), shares it acquired when it sold its international unit Alico to MetLife last year. AIG paid Treasury another $300 million in funds it had retained for expenses related to the Alico deal. After those payments, the Treasury still holds about $11.3 billion in preferred interests in AIG. It also owns about 92 percent of AIG’s common stock. At Tuesday’s closing share price, the sale of that stock would generate a profit for the taxpayer of about $14.22 billion. The Treasury said it expects taxpayers to recover “every dollar” of AIG’s bailout, which at one point swelled to $182 billion. Of the TARP funds still outstanding, about 70 percent are concentrated in AIG, finance company Ally Financial and automaker General Motors. (GM.N) Any ultimate profit on the AIG shares would help offset any possible loss from the sale of the auto businesses. (Reporting by Ben Berkowitz, editing by Matthew Lewis) Copyright 2011 Thomson Reuters. Click for Restrictions .

Read the full article →

Obama’s Small Business Plan To Come Up Short, White House Concedes

February 15, 2011

NEW YORK — After spending much of last year relentlessly touting the benefits of a proposed $30 billion fund that would jumpstart bank lending to small businesses, the Obama administration forecasts the initiative will fall far short, spending just a little over half of the intended allotment, according to the White House’s spending plan for 2012. The proposal, known as the Small Business Lending Fund, originally would have taken $30 billion from the Troubled Asset Relief Program and diverted it to smaller banks. The move was supposed to stimulate lending by lowering the cost of funds as loan totals rise. The more a bank lends, the cheaper the funds become. The program has faced an uphill climb. Banks are wary of taking government funds for fear of after-the-fact program changes; demand for loans remains tepid; and there’s no guarantee banks would lend the money once they receive it. The White House spending plan for next year reflects those challenges. The administration projects it will allocate just $17.4 billion of the funds, or just 58 percent of its original goal. All of the money will be disbursed by Sept. 30, according to Treasury Department projections released Monday. The proposal was a centerpiece of the administration’s pre-election plans to boost small businesses, which have been among the hardest-hit sectors since the onset of the financial crisis. Unlike large corporations, small businesses don’t have access to the capital markets. They don’t issue debt to investors nor do they raise capital on stock exchanges. Instead, they rely on banks for their funding. Small community lenders and regional banks are their primary source of credit. But bank lending froze as consumer spending fell, business investment slowed and banks faced growing losses on bad loans. Inside the Treasury Department, a small team worked to counter the slowdown. By January of last year, Obama was able to pitch the plan that would help smaller firms get credit and help stabilize small lenders. The plan was to inject taxpayer funds into community banks in hopes they’d lend it to small businesses. It worked like TARP: Banks borrow cash from Treasury, and pay a small fee for the privilege. The program, though, was limited to banks with less than $10 billion in assets. Republican critics derided it as “TARP 2.0,” or a reincarnation of the deeply unpopular bank bailout. In fact, banks in TARP can refinance out of the program and into this new one, escaping the restrictions that accompanied TARP like limits on executive compensation. Administration officials and Democrats in Congress, though, pitched it as much-needed help for small businesses. The administration spent nine months pounding Republicans for their objections to the proposal. Last September, a little over a month to the election, Obama signed it into law. During a speech last March to economists in Washington, Christina D. Romer, the then-chairman of the White House Council of Economic Advisers, said the $30 billion fund “will translate into several times that amount of additional lending and could help create hundreds of thousands of new jobs.” Based on administration projections released Monday, it’s unclear whether the fund will achieve its original objectives. The White House declined to comment. Officials insist they have $30 billion to lend. The Treasury Department is in the midst of trying to sign up banks for the fund, but bankers have said they’re reluctant to accept any more taxpayer money. Meanwhile, the government watchdog overseeing the bailout, the Special Inspector General for the Troubled Asset Relief Program, said earlier this month it would immediately audit the program. ************************* Shahien Nasiripour is a business reporter for The Huffington Post. You can send him an e-mail ; bookmark his page ; subscribe to his RSS feed ; follow him on Twitter ; friend him on Facebook ; become a fan ; and/or get e-mail alerts when he reports the latest news. He can be reached at 646-274-2455.

Read the full article →

Top Government Watchdog Stepping Down

February 14, 2011

WASHINGTON — The government’s top watchdog over the $700 billion financial bailout said Monday that he will step down next month, after leading an office that uncovered millions of dollars in fraud among potential recipients. Neil Barofsky said in a letter to President Barack Obama that he will leave this job as special inspector general for the Troubled Asset Relief Program on March 30. A spokeswoman says Barofsky believes the office met the goals that he laid out for it: deterring fraud, improving transparency and overseeing the government’s management of the bailouts. Barofsky led investigations that resulted in 14 criminal fraud convictions of bankers. The office’s enforcement staff followed leads from a tip line Barofsky set up and from banks’ applications for bailout money. It was the only watchdog overseeing the bailout that had law enforcement authority. His office saved taxpayers $553 million by recognizing fraud at Colonial Bank and halting the Treasury Department’s plan to send the bank money. Colonial collapsed months later. It was the sixth-largest U.S. bank failure. Barofsky criticized both the Obama and Bush administration. He blasted Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner and his predecessor, Henry Paulson, in a series of audits of the bailout fund, which was created by Congress in October 2008. The audits examined issues such as Geithner’s role in the rescue of American International Group Inc. and the department’s decision to close of thousands of auto dealers. Barofsky’s audits often prodded Treasury to make its bailout decisions more transparently. The office also grabbed headlines during the crisis by emphasizing the worst-possible outcomes of decisions that it criticized. For example, Barofsky wrote in mid-2009 that the government’s support programs totaled $23.7 trillion. That number represents the maximum size of 50 separate programs related to the crisis and the recession. It was not an estimate of possible losses. White House spokeswoman Amy Brundage said in a statement that Barofksy “provided strong oversight of the TARP program for the past two years.” “We are grateful for Mr. Barofsky’s service,” she said. Barofsky’s spokeswoman said Barofsky’s top deputy, Christy Romero, will become acting special inspector general next month. Romero formerly was an enforcement lawyer with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Barofsky is a former federal prosecutor who was nominated by President George W. Bush in November 2008. He was confirmed unanimously by the Senate the following month.

Read the full article →

Wall Street Pay Jumps 5.7 Percent, Breaking Record

February 2, 2011

Wall Street pay is rising, while income for normal Americans has stagnated. Even as the real economy limped, financial firms paid employees a record sum last year, the Wall Street Journal reports. In 2009, the last full year data are available, average wages for Americans fell 1.5 percent from the previous year, according to the National Average Wage Index. Median household income in 2009 was “not statistically different” from 2008, according to the Census Bureau . But total pay at Wall Street firms rose 5.7 percent in 2010, as the 25 companies that have already reported results shelled out a record $135 billion. Even as regulators pressured firms to alter compensation, prominent executives got big pay bumps, seeming to suggest that the former Wall Street culture has emerged virtually unscathed from the recession. In the years leading up to the financial crisis, executives got bonuses based on their companies’ short-term performance, a phenomenon that experts say encouraged excessively risky behavior. When lawmakers drafted regulations for the financial sector, executive compensation became a crucial subject for reform. The stimulus act, passed in early 2009, contained rules limiting pay. But those rules have not worked, according to a December report from the Council of Institutional Investors. While some firms did decrease bonuses, they also raised base salaries to compensate. Even the new forms of pay — such as restricted stock, designed to align executives’ interests with those of shareholders — don’t effectively curb dangerous risk, the report found. Indeed, combined pay at the financial firms surveyed by the WSJ hit an all-time high last year. Despite concerns in recent months that firms were suffering from a decline in trading volume, revenue rose 1 percent to $417 billion, another all-time record. Meanwhile, the percentage of revenue that went into employees’ pockets climbed as well, from 31.1 percent in 2009 to 32.5 percent last year. The taxpayer bailout that firms received during the crisis has helped amplify Wall Street’s bottom lines . With hundreds of billions from the Troubled Asset Relief Program and other initiatives, the five biggest investment banks — Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan, Bank of America, Citigroup and Morgan Stanley — saw their revenues soar, Bloomberg News reported last year. As TARP has wound down, the Federal Reserve has launched a $600 billion asset-purchase program, intended to augment the flow of cash through the economy, which has also been a direct and indirect boon for the banks. As it buys U.S. government debt, the Fed announces its purchases ahead of time, giving certain banks an opportunity to profit on the trades.

Read the full article →

Grover Norquist: John Thune Must Renounce TARP Vote

January 24, 2011

Grover Norquist, president of the conservative advocacy group Americans for Tax Relief, said recently that if Sen. John Thune (R-S.D.) wants to be considered a serious presidential candidate in 2012, he will first have to publicly denounce his 2008 vote in favor of creating the Troubled Asset Relief Program, the bailout initiative that is decried by many conservatives as among the most profligate examples of big-government spending. “Get up and say: ‘That is never happening again. Boy, did we get sold a bill of goods, and here is my rule of thumb as to why you know that I know that won’t happen again,’” Norquist advised in an interview with the Argus Leader . “You can change your mind on one thing in one direction credibly if you explain it.” As GOP 12 points out , Thune seems to be well aware that some key conservatives will take issue with his TARP vote. He’s taken some steps to address the matter before, though a lot of his energy has been spent on efforts to rebrand himself as an opponent of the program. John Thune, however, is likely taking some comfort in the fact that he is not the only potential 2012 GOP candidate with baggage. Every contender appears to have chinks in their armor, which are only likely to become more pronounced as they approach what is likely to be a bruising primary campaign. Republican strategist Karl Rove recently jabbed former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney for his work on a state health-care system that pushed an individual health-insurance mandate similar to that of President Barack Obama’s signature 2010 law.

Read the full article →

Bailed Out Banks Teeter Towards Collapse

December 27, 2010

Nearly 100 banks previously rescued by the federal government are again poised to fail, despite billions of dollars of support from the American Treasury. The number of banks on the brink of collapse rose from 86 to 98 during the summer months, according to analysis of federal data from the Wall Street Journal . The banks in question have received $4.2 billion dollars in aid through the Troubled Asset Relief Program ( TARP ). Most of the troubled institutions are relatively small. The latest sign of distress in the financial system suggests the bailout may have simply been a stopgap solution for a sector still contending with the aftershocks of the greatest banking crisis in 80 years. The continued weakness of some banks now threatens to impede a tentative economic recovery, say experts. With many banks still troubled, lending remains tight, depriving businesses of capital to expand and hire. With expansion and hiring rare, the economy remains weak, depriving the banks of healthy customers–in short, a feedback loop of trouble. The Wall Street Journal defined “troubled banks” as those with less than 6 percent of their primary assets both reliable and liquid. Through TARP, the government has purchased hundreds of billions of troubled assets from banks in danger. Though the program was purportedly meant to benefit healthy institutions with a good chance of survival, these latest failures suggest that many banks were in tenuous shape to begin with. Seven TARP recipients have already failed, at a loss of $2.7 billion. But some analysts pointed to the fact that most of the failing institutions are relatively small in dismissing concerns. “If Citibank and Bank of America were going under, that would be a problem,” said Mark Blyth, a political economy professor at Brown and a fellow of the Watson Institute for International Studies . “The bailout was meant to deal with a global systemic crisis. It was not to make sure that some bank in Utah with dodgy commercial real estate would be okay.” Blyth expects some smaller banks to continue to fall, due in large part to the lack of growth in the economy. “People aren’t borrowing,” he said. “The reason they’re not borrowing is because they’re up to their eyeballs in debt.”

Read the full article →

Rescued Banks Teeter Towards Collapse

December 27, 2010

Nearly 100 banks previously rescued by the federal government are again poised to fail, despite billions of dollars of support from the American Treasury. The number of banks on the brink of collapse rose from 86 to 98 during the summer months, according to analysis of federal data from the Wall Street Journal . The banks in question have received $4.2 billion dollars in aid through the Troubled Asset Relief Program ( TARP ). Most of the troubled institutions are relatively small. The latest sign of distress in the financial system suggests the bailout may have simply been a stopgap solution for a sector still contending with the aftershocks of the greatest banking crisis in 80 years. The continued weakness of some banks now threatens to impede a tentative economic recovery, say experts. With many banks still troubled, lending remains tight, depriving businesses of capital to expand and hire. With expansion and hiring rare, the economy remains weak, depriving the banks of healthy customers–in short, a feedback loop of trouble. The Wall Street Journal defined “troubled banks” as those with less than 6 percent of their primary assets both reliable and liquid. Through TARP, the government has purchased hundreds of billions of troubled assets from banks in danger. Though the program was purportedly meant to benefit healthy institutions with a good chance of survival, these latest failures suggest that many banks were in tenuous shape to begin with. Seven TARP recipients have already failed, at a loss of $2.7 billion. But some analysts pointed to the fact that most of the failing institutions are relatively small in dismissing concerns. “If Citibank and Bank of America were going under, that would be a problem,” said Mark Blyth, a political economy professor at Brown and a fellow of the Watson Institute for International Studies . “The bailout was meant to deal with a global systemic crisis. It was not to make sure that some bank in Utah with dodgy commercial real estate would be okay.” Blyth expects some smaller banks to continue to fall, due in large part to the lack of growth in the economy. “People aren’t borrowing,” he said. “The reason they’re not borrowing is because they’re up to their eyeballs in debt.”

Read the full article →

Video: Kaufman Says Foreclosure Document Crisis Threatens Banks

November 16, 2010

Nov. 16 (Bloomberg) — Edward Kaufman, former Democratic Senator from Delaware who chairs the Congressional Oversight Panel for the Troubled Asset Relief Program, discusses the panel’s examination of the foreclosure document crisis, which the panel concludes could have serious consequences for housing and the economy. Kaufman speaks with Carol Massar on Bloomberg Television’s “In the Loop With Betty Liu.” (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Potential AIG Bailout Loss Was Concealed By Treasury, Federal Auditor Says

October 26, 2010

The U.S. Treasury concealed $40 billion in likely taxpayer losses on the bailout of American International Group (AIG.N), the New York Times said, citing a report by Neil Barofsky, the special inspector general for the Troubled Asset Relief Program. “In our view, this is a significant failure in their transparency,” Barofsky said in an interview with the New York Times. Early this month, the Treasury changed its usual valuation methods and issued a report saying that U.S. taxpayers would ultimately lose just $5 billion on the AIG investment, the paper said. The Treasury had previously maintained a conservative estimate that it would lose $45 billion on the bailout of AIG. However, on Monday, a Treasury official disputed Barofsky’s conclusions, saying the department appropriately used different methods for different purposes, the Times said. The official told the newspaper that the smaller loss was a projection of future events and the larger one was the result of an audit, which includes only realized gains and losses. The Treasury will include more information about the AIG investment when it issues its own audited financial statement in November, which may likely report taxpayer losses of more than $5 billion, according to the paper. The Treasury department and the office of the Special Inspector General for TARP could not immediately be reached for comment by Reuters outside regular U.S. business hours. (Reporting by Sakthi Prasad in Bangalore) Copyright 2010 Thomson Reuters. Click for Restrictions .

Read the full article →

Video: TARP’s Massad Says PPIP Helped Restart Mortgage Markets: Video

October 22, 2010

Oct. 22 (Bloomberg) — Tim Massad, acting administrator of the U.S. government’s Troubled Asset Relief Program, talks with Bloomberg’s Mark Crumpton about the Public-Private Investment Program. The PPIP, a government program aimed at reviving the mortgage-backed securities market returned more than triple what stocks or bonds gained in the past year. (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Video: Bove Sees Bank Layoffs From Delay in Industry’s Recovery: Video

October 1, 2010

Oct. 1 (Bloomberg) — Richard Bove, an analyst at Rochdale Securities, talks with Bloomberg’s Julie Hyman and Mark Crumpton about the outlook for the banking industry. Bove also discusses the “staggering success” of the Troubled Asset Relief Program, and investor sentiment. (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Video: Fitzsimmons Says Trustmark-Cadence Sets Bank M&A Roadmap: Video

October 1, 2010

Oct. 1 (Bloomberg) — Kevin Fitzsimmons, an analyst at Sandler O’Neill & Partners, discusses the outlook for regional banks with outstanding loans received from the Treasury’s Troubled Asset Relief Program and Trustmark Crop.’s agreement to acquire Cadence Financial Corp. Fitzsimmons speaks with Margaret Brennan on Bloomberg Television’s “InBusiness.” (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Elizabeth Warren Was Paid To Be An Expert Witness In Cases Against Bailed-Out Banks

September 28, 2010

While acting as a government-appointed bailout watchdog, Elizabeth Warren, whom President Obama appointed this month to lead the creation of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau , served as an expert witness in cases against some of the big banks receiving aid from the Troubled Asset Relief Program, Bloomberg News reports. Warren was paid $90,000 to be an expert witness in a class-action lawsuit at the same time she was head of the Congressional Oversight Panel , which oversees the $700 billion government bailout of the financial sector. Bank of America, Citigroup and JPMorgan Chase, all of which received TARP assistance, were among the defendants in the suit, according to Bloomberg . Warren told Bloomberg that her work as a witness constituted no ethical violations, saying she had prior approval from the ethics lawyer for the Congressional Oversight Panel. A Harvard professor and an expert on the financial sector particularly as it relates to middle-class consumers, Warren said she was allowed to continue doing side jobs even as she held this government role. Warren is famously tough as advocate for the middle class, and a former student described her teaching style at Harvard as “Socratic with a machine gun.” As head of the panel overseeing TARP, she remained more skeptical than Treasury secretary Tim Geithner about whether the program had actually succeeded in ensuring that certain banks could function without government support. In appointing Warren to set up the CFPB, which she is credited with devising, the president effectively made her head of the agency, at least for now, and sidestepped what could have been a contentious confirmation hearing.

Read the full article →

Lloyd Blankfein Took Home $125 Million In Bonuses In Last 10 Years, But Shareholders Haven’t Been So Lucky

September 21, 2010

Lloyd Blankfein, CEO of Goldman Sachs, took home $125 million in cash bonuses over the past decade, Bloomberg reports. Shareholders, however, haven’t been quite so lucky. Even though Goldman has outperformed its peers over Blankfein’s tenure, Bloomberg points out that one-year certificates of deposit and 10-year Treasury bonds purchased in September 2000 beat Goldman’s total return over the same period. The logic behind lavish CEO pay depends on maximizing returns for shareholders, but Bloomberg notes that the S&P 500 Financials Index, which includes 80 companies, has dropped 49 percent in the past ten years. Blankfein, who paid $26 million in 2008 for a condo in the Robert Stern-designed 15 Central Park West building in Manhattan, and who last month sold his previous apartment at 941 Park Avenue for $12.15 million , has overseen a period of relative strength since becoming CEO in June 2006. Even as the financial world nearly collapsed around it, Goldman has remained strong , or gotten even grown stronger . When Goldman settled with the S.E.C. for $550 million in July, the perception was that the bank and its CEO, who joined the company back in 1981 when it bought his then-employer J. Aron, had gotten off easy . Transparency regarding bonuses has been limited. This summer, the financial community braced for embarrassment in anticipation of a report by U.S. pay czar Kenneth Feinberg disclosing the total bonuses Wall Street paid during the beginning of the bailout (from the passage of the Troubled Asset Relief Program in October 2008 until February 2009, when oversight laws were passed), the Wall Street Journal said. But when the report actually came out in July, Feinberg didn’t say how much of the total $1.6 billion the 17 firms in question actually got, and declined to cite specific examples of excessive compensation. He said, according to the WSJ , that the payments “were ill advised, they were troublesome. But I do not believe it is fair to declare … that the payments were ‘contrary to the public interest.’”

Read the full article →

Video: Obama May Name Warren as Interim Consumer Agency Head: Video

September 14, 2010

Sept. 14 (Bloomberg) — President Barack Obama may appoint Elizabeth Warren as the interim head of the new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau as early as this week, according to a person familiar with the matter. An appointment as interim head would allow Warren, a Harvard law professor and chairman of the congressional panel overseeing the Troubled Asset Relief Program, to bypass a confirmation battle in the Senate. Bloomberg’s Hans Nichols reports. (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Video: Pimco’s Kashkari Discusses U.S. Entitlement Programs: Video

July 29, 2010

July 29 (Bloomberg) — Neel Kashkari, head of new investment initiatives at Pacific Investment Management Co. and former head of the Troubled Asset Relief Program, discusses the impact of entitlement programs on the federal budget deficit and the outlook for the economy. Kashkari speaks with Margaret Brennan on Bloomberg Television’s “InBusiness.” (This is an excerpt of the full interview. Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Dylan Ratigan Rips GOP Congressman Kevin Brady Over Wall Street Greed

July 13, 2010

Rep. Kevin Brady (R-Texas) looked uncomfortable when MSNBC host Dylan Ratigan introduced him Tuesday afternoon to talk about unemployment benefits and Wall Street greed. Brady’s discomfort proved well-founded. Ratigan tore into the Texas Republican, who voted against the extension of unemployment benefits but for the Wall Street bailout known as the Troubled Asset Relief Program. Brady repeatedly attempted to deflect Ratigan’s harsh line of questioning on the nature of Wall Street by arguing that potential — not actual — tax increases are stifling capital investment and thus job creation, but the MSNBC host didn’t let up. “I know you have an issue with the government, but I’ve got an issue with a private industry that’s using the government to rape my country of its money, and I’d like to try to put a stop to that,” Ratigan said. “We are facing higher taxes in energy and income and capital and dividends,” Brady argued, not for the last time. “All those tax proposals are what’s keeping our recovery from gaining steam–” “That’s a lie. That’s a lie,” Ratigan shot back. “What’s keeping our recovery from gaining steam is the fact that the financial industry is stealing America’s money, depriving this country of any investment whatsoever, and that is the entire basis of our system, and the government has converted it from an investment vehicle into a vehicle for it to steal money for its rich friends.” The MSNBC host ended the segment on a frustrated note, complaining that Brady simply retreated to his talking points. “I’m done with you,” Ratigan said, after he challenged Brady to answer his questions and his guest resumed talking about possible future taxes. WATCH: Visit msnbc.com for breaking news , world news , and news about the economy

Read the full article →

Dylan Ratigan Rips GOP Congressman Kevin Brady Over Wall Street Greed

July 13, 2010

Rep. Kevin Brady (R-Texas) looked uncomfortable when MSNBC host Dylan Ratigan introduced him Tuesday afternoon to talk about unemployment benefits and Wall Street greed. Brady’s discomfort proved well-founded. Ratigan tore into the Texas Republican, who voted against the extension of unemployment benefits but for the Wall Street bailout known as the Troubled Asset Relief Program. Brady repeatedly attempted to deflect Ratigan’s harsh line of questioning on the nature of Wall Street by arguing that potential — not actual — tax increases are stifling capital investment and thus job creation, but the MSNBC host didn’t let up. “I know you have an issue with the government, but I’ve got an issue with a private industry that’s using the government to rape my country of its money, and I’d like to try to put a stop to that,” Ratigan said. “We are facing higher taxes in energy and income and capital and dividends,” Brady argued, not for the last time. “All those tax proposals are what’s keeping our recovery from gaining steam–” “That’s a lie. That’s a lie,” Ratigan shot back. “What’s keeping our recovery from gaining steam is the fact that the financial industry is stealing America’s money, depriving this country of any investment whatsoever, and that is the entire basis of our system, and the government has converted it from an investment vehicle into a vehicle for it to steal money for its rich friends.” The MSNBC host ended the segment on a frustrated note, complaining that Brady simply retreated to his talking points. “I’m done with you,” Ratigan said, after he challenged Brady to answer his questions and his guest resumed talking about possible future taxes. WATCH: Visit msnbc.com for breaking news , world news , and news about the economy

Read the full article →

Goldman Sachs ‘Most Aggressive’ In Demanding Cash From AIG

June 30, 2010

Goldman Sachs was the “most aggressive” financial firm to demand cash from AIG on what it viewed as souring deals during the financial crisis, the head of a federal investigative panel said Wednesday. Goldman Sachs Group, the most profitable firm on Wall Street, was the “first in the door” in demanding collateral from the disgraced insurer — once one of the world’s most successful and creditworthy companies — on its derivatives deals, said Phil Angelides, chairman of the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission. Goldman comprised 27 percent of AIG’s derivatives portfolio at the end of 2007, yet held 89 percent of collateral that AIG posted to all of its counterparties, Angelides said, citing AIG documents. Wall Street’s most successful firm was “way ahead of everyone else” on demanding collateral from the giant insurer, Angelides said. And Goldman was “much more aggressive” about marking down the value of those securities, he added. Joseph Cassano, the former head of AIG Financial Products, the derivatives unit whose actions ultimately led to the firm’s taxpayer-financed government rescue, told Angelides’s panel Wednesday that he was “surprised” at the magnitude of Goldman’s increasing demands for collateral. Goldman eventually received $14 billion through its insurance contracts — specifically its credit default swaps, an insurance-like derivative product — from AIG, according to a November report by the Office of the Special Inspector General for the Troubled Asset Relief Program. Of that, $8.4 billion was in the form of collateral payments that Goldman simply kept; $5.6 billion was from taxpayers through a special investment vehicle created by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. Taxpayers committed $182 billion to backstop AIG. Taxpayers own 79.9 percent of the insurer. The firm’s counterparties, like Goldman, were paid 100 cents on the dollar. It’s unclear whether taxpayers will be made whole. Goldman consistently marked its contracts with AIG lower than any of the firm’s other counterparties, said Angelides and Cassano. One example given was a collateral call of $1.8 billion. As the value of the securities fluctuated, the firms would post collateral to one another to cover their positions. Cassano said that the $1.8 billion demand was surprising particularly due to its lack of “incrementality.” “It went from nothing to $1.8 billion,” Cassano said, who left his position as head of AIG’s derivatives unit in early 2008. AIG then went out and solicited prices from other counterparties to check if Goldman’s marks were accurate. Within a month or so, Goldman lowered its demand to $450 million. Cassano said that a counterpart at Goldman told him, “I don’t think we covered ourselves in glory.”

Read the full article →

Taylor Bean’s Former CEO Lee Farkas Is Charged in $1.9 Billion TARP Fraud

June 16, 2010

By William McQuillen and Justin Blum June 16 (Bloomberg) — Lee Farkas , the former chairman of Taylor, Bean & Whitaker Mortgage Corp., was accused by the U.S. of helping run a more than $1.9 billion fraud scheme aimed in part at the government’s Troubled Asset Relief Program. An indictment unsealed today in federal court in Alexandria, Virginia, alleges that Farkas, 57, and fellow conspirators sought to deceive financial firms and TARP by covering up shortfalls at his closely held mortgage lending company based in Ocala, Florida. The company filed for bankruptcy in August 2009. Farkas was arrested yesterday by the Federal Bureau of Investigation in Ocala, said Lindsay Godwin, an FBI spokeswoman. The scheme contributed to the failure of Colonial BancGroup Inc., one of the 50 largest U.S. banks in 2009, and closely held Taylor, Bean & Whitaker, once one of the largest privately held mortgage companies in the U.S., the Justice Department said in a news release. Farkas and unnamed co-conspirators are accused by the government of misappropriating more than $400 million from a division of Colonial and about $1.5 billion from Ocala Funding, a mortgage lending facility controlled by Taylor, Bean & Whitaker. The indictment alleges that Farkas and his co- conspirators committed wire and securities fraud by attempting unsuccessfully to persuade the government to provide Colonial with about $553 million in TARP funds. Farkas misappropriated more than $20 million in Taylor, Bean & Whitaker funds for personal use, according to the government’s pretrial detention memo. “To cover up collateral shortfalls, Farkas and co- conspirators caused false information to be sent to the financial services investors,” the indictment said. The case is USA v. Farkas, 10cr200, U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia (Alexandria). To contact the reporter on this story: William McQuillen in Washington at bmcquillen@bloomberg.net

Read the full article →

Parsons Says Citigroup on `Road to Recovery,’ No Longer Has Bailout Option

June 15, 2010

By Greg Miles and Bradley Keoun June 15 (Bloomberg) — Citigroup Inc. is on the “road to recovery” and wouldn’t have access to another rescue from the government should the need arise, Chairman Richard Parsons said. “I don’t think there is the political will” for another bailout, Parsons said today at a Bloomberg Link Boards & Risk Conference in Washington. He said the New York-based company has no need for more aid from the U.S. Citigroup posted a $4.25 billion profit for the first quarter after recording $27 billion of losses in 2008 and 2009 that prompted a $45 billion government rescue. The $700 billion Troubled Asset Relief Program to stabilize the nation’s banking system prompted calls for legislation that would prohibit such government intervention in the future and impose restrictions on the types of businesses large financial institutions could own. Parsons said he doesn’t think the government should break up large banks such as Citigroup because “the marketplace requires institutions like ours” to serve global companies with operations in more than 50 countries. “Trying to bomb everybody back to the stone age, is the way I call it, trying to make everybody go back to being a community bank so that you’re not systemically important would be counterproductive, would be from a U.S. perspective shooting ourselves in the foot in terms of global competition ,” Parsons said. Board Rotation Parsons, 62, who took over as Citigroup’s chairman in February 2009, said he “basically” agrees with former Citigroup director John Deutch ’s comments last year that all of the directors who served before the bank’s bailout should rotate off in an “orderly fashion.” Parsons said he told new Citigroup directors that he would stay at the bank “at least until we got the ship off the sandbar and back out to deep water.” He declined to estimate when that might happen. “I think the ship is lifting off the sandbar,” he said. In December Citigroup repaid $20 billion of the bailout funds, and the government is now selling its remaining 21 percent stake in the lender. The bank’s share price rose 7 cents to $3.95 as of 1:17 p.m. in New York Stock Exchange composite trading. To contact the reporters on this story: Greg Miles in Washington at gmiles1@bloomberg.net ; Bradley Keoun in New York at bkeoun@bloomberg.net

Read the full article →

Parsons Says Citigroup on `Road to Recovery,’ No Longer Has Bailout Option

June 15, 2010

By Greg Miles and Bradley Keoun June 15 (Bloomberg) — Citigroup Inc. is on the “road to recovery” and wouldn’t have access to another rescue from the government should the need arise, Chairman Richard Parsons said. “I don’t think there is the political will” for another bailout, Parsons said today at a Bloomberg Link Boards & Risk Conference in Washington. He said the New York-based company has no need for more aid from the U.S. Citigroup posted a $4.25 billion profit for the first quarter after recording $27 billion of losses in 2008 and 2009 that prompted a $45 billion government rescue. The $700 billion Troubled Asset Relief Program to stabilize the nation’s banking system prompted calls for legislation that would prohibit such government intervention in the future and impose restrictions on the types of businesses large financial institutions could own. Parsons said he doesn’t think the government should break up large banks such as Citigroup because “the marketplace requires institutions like ours” to serve global companies with operations in more than 50 countries. “Trying to bomb everybody back to the stone age, is the way I call it, trying to make everybody go back to being a community bank so that you’re not systemically important would be counterproductive, would be from a U.S. perspective shooting ourselves in the foot in terms of global competition ,” Parsons said. Board Rotation Parsons, 62, who took over as Citigroup’s chairman in February 2009, said he “basically” agrees with former Citigroup director John Deutch ’s comments last year that all of the directors who served before the bank’s bailout should rotate off in an “orderly fashion.” Parsons said he told new Citigroup directors that he would stay at the bank “at least until we got the ship off the sandbar and back out to deep water.” He declined to estimate when that might happen. “I think the ship is lifting off the sandbar,” he said. In December Citigroup repaid $20 billion of the bailout funds, and the government is now selling its remaining 21 percent stake in the lender. The bank’s share price rose 7 cents to $3.95 as of 1:17 p.m. in New York Stock Exchange composite trading. To contact the reporters on this story: Greg Miles in Washington at gmiles1@bloomberg.net ; Bradley Keoun in New York at bkeoun@bloomberg.net

Read the full article →

Fifth Third Names Former FDIC Leader William Isaac Chairman of Ohio Bank

May 29, 2010

By Nikolaj Gammeltoft May 29 (Bloomberg) — Fifth Third Bancorp named William Isaac as chairman, putting the former Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. leader in charge of the board after Ohio’s largest bank posted its third straight quarterly loss. Isaac, 66, the FDIC chairman from 1981 to 1985, takes over from Kevin T. Kabat , 53, who will continue as president and chief executive officer, the Cincinnati-based bank said yesterday in a statement. Isaac, an Ohio native, has been a banking-industry consultant and a participant in at least one group of private investors trying to buy distressed lenders. “Bringing Bill on board as non-executive chairman improves our already strong corporate governance practices and provides support to Kevin and his leadership team in the ever-changing financial landscape,” said lead director James P. Hackett in the statement. Fifth Third posted a $10 million first-quarter loss , with Kabat predicting credit would improve in the second quarter and that write-offs for the full year would be “significantly below” 2009 levels. The bank took $3.4 billion from the U.S. Treasury Department’s Troubled Asset Relief Program, and hasn’t yet repaid the funds. The decision to split the chairman and CEO jobs is “about corporate governance,” Fifth Third spokeswoman Debra Decourcy said. “It’s not about performance.” Moffett Departs Separately, David Moffett , head of an investment group including Isaac that aimed to buy failed banks, is leaving his post and the venture may disband after raising about a third of its $1 billion goal, according to two people with direct knowledge of the matter. Moffett was CEO of BSE Management LLC, where Isaac is chairman. No decisions on the future of the group have been made, according to the people, who declined to be identified because the discussions are private. BSE was one of at least a dozen investment groups hoping to buy lenders as banks close at the fastest pace since 1992. Fifth Third fell 26 cents, or 2 percent, to $13 in Nasdaq Stock Market trading. The shares gained 33 percent this year. For Related News and Information: Top finance stories: FTOP Stories on the banking industry: NI BNK Stories on the Troubled Asset Relief Program: NI TARP Stories about the credit crunch: NI CRUNCH Writedowns and credit losses v. capital raised: WDCI

Read the full article →

Midwest Banc’s Lender, Recipient of TARP Funds, Is Seized as 4 Banks Fail

May 15, 2010

By Dakin Campbell May 15 (Bloomberg) — Midwest Banc Holdings Inc. , recipient of $84.8 million in bailout funds from the Troubled Asset Relief Program, had its Illinois lender seized by regulators as the count of failed U.S. banks this year rose to 72. Midwest Bank and Trust, with $3.17 billion in assets and 23 retail branches, was closed yesterday by a state regulator, according to a statement on the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. website. Firstmerit Bank of Akron, Ohio, assumed all the $2.42 billion in deposits. The U.S. Treasury Department’s stake is made up of convertible preferred shares, Midwest said in a statement on March 2. Three other banks were seized yesterday, in Georgia, Michigan and Missouri. The closings cost the FDIC’s deposit- insurance fund a total of $301.7 million, the agency said. U.S. banks are collapsing amid losses on residential and commercial real estate loans, and the FDIC’s list of “problem” lenders is the longest since 1992, at 702. FDIC Chairman Sheila Bair has said she expects failures to slow, yet still exceed last year’s total of 140. Firstmerit paid a 0.4 percent premium to the FDIC to acquire the operations of Midwest Bank and Trust. Midwest’s parent reported earlier this week that its first-quarter net loss was $107.9 million. The FDIC also received a premium for auctioning off the assets and deposits of two other banks. Ameris Bank of Moultrie, Georgia, paid a premium of 0.19 percent to acquire the $134 million in deposits at Saint Marys, Georgia-based Satilla Community Bank . It is at least the third acquisition by Ameris of a failed bank through the FDIC. The lender purchased United Security Bank in November and American United Bank in October. Southwest Community Bank of Springfield, Missouri, was also shut. Simmons First National Bank of Pine Bluff, Arkansas, paid a 0.5 percent premium for its $102.5 million in deposits. Michigan’s Bank of Ann Arbor purchased the $109.1 million in assets and $101.8 million of deposits of New Liberty Bank in Plymouth, Michigan. Bank of Ann Arbor didn’t pay a premium. To contact the reporter on this story: Dakin Campbell in San Francisco at dcampbell27@bloomberg.net

Read the full article →

Video: Huntington’s Steinour Says Bank Stresses Internal Growth: Video

May 14, 2010

May 14 (Bloomberg) — Stephen Steinour, chief executive officer of Huntington Bancshares Inc., talks with Bloomberg’s Julie Hyman and Lori Rothman about the company’s growth strategy. Steinour also discusses the outlook for credit markets, the possible impact of legislation to overhaul U.S. financial regulation on Huntington and its plans to pay back funds from the Troubled Asset Relief Program. (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Dan Dorfman: A Crash Scenario for Late 2010

May 12, 2010

“The most dangerous thing is illusion,” Ralph Waldo Emerson wrote. But last Thursday’s nearly 1,000-point decline in the Dow Industrial during the trading session was no illusion, nor was the accompanying 600-point tumble that day in a mere 20 minutes. It was the real thing as that day’s devastation wiped out nearly $1 trillion in equity values as the Dow wrapped up the session with a 347-point loss. More frightening, as Florida investment adviser Harry Dent, Jr., sees it, that day’s bloodbath is “a sign of things to come.” First, though, his reaction to the announcement the other day of a $1 trillion or $955 billion European rescue package that sent the Dow soaring 404 points. “Are the markets nuts or what?” asks Dent. He thinks the buyers who eagerly snapped up stocks that day are unmistakable illusionists, which my dictionary defines as persons subject to false impressions. Where the investing public is concerned, he thinks these illusionists are all over the place. The last time I caught up with Dent was in February when he predicted the Greek and European debt crises would get progressively worse and that the stock market would run into hurricane weather in May. He was right on. His update on the European crisis: the markets are still in total denial about the total amount of debt in the developed countries and the ability of governments to bail out and guaranty everything. They simply can’t, he says. Now we have the European version of TARP (Troubled Asset Relief Program) — another $1 trillion in stimulus and rescue. Where does it end? Dent, the editor of HS Dent Forecast , a monthly newsletter out of Tampa, Fla., looks for economic and geopolitical, and possibly even geological, challenges to continue to occur, and eventually our bail-out programs will not be able to respond. This is very likely to start to happen, he says, between July and August, and that will finally kill the “debt denial.” Addressing himself to what he regards as the most worrisome U.S. issue, burgeoning debt — $14 trillion in government debt and $42 trillion in national debt, of which $17 trillion is in the financial sector alone, in turn creating unprecedented leverage in investments, Dent figures once the markets wake up to the total amount outstanding and recognize the fact that it cannot be sustained, there will be rapid deleveraging. A contrarian and bearish as the dickens, he also takes a dim view of our economic scene. In contrast to many economists, who are looking for 3% to 3.5% GDP growth this year, Dent expects the economic roof to cave in around year end, with GDP turning negative between the fourth quarter of 2010 and the first quarter of 2011, and then worsening after that. His chief reasoning: Serious mortgage delinquencies will continue to go straight up, meaning home prices will not come back and banks will be struck with massive loan defaults; baby boomer spending, which peaked between late 2007 and early 2010, will falter badly, and unemployment, now 9.9%, will shoot up to 15%. Obviously, such expectations herald bum tidings for the stock market. Dent agrees, but not immediately, he says. He thinks investors should stay with the markets for now, as he feels new highs — in the 11,600-11,800 Dow range — are still the most likely scenario into late June or beyond. But then, he would sell into the rally and run because he sees another market crash that should knock down the Dow (currently around 10,830) to about 3,800 by year end. At the same time, he says he would unload real estate, commodities a bit later on and then move aggressively into cash. Speaking of commodities, Dent thinks that gold, which recently scooted to an all-time high of about $1,245 an ounce, may have hit a top for now after achieving 96% bullish readings in trader sentiment. He has similar thoughts about the U.S. dollar, which has attained 98% bullish readings. It’s worth noting that Dent has made some flamboyant forecasts in past years that have turned out to be dead wrong. Most noteworthy, I recall, was his 2005 prediction that the Dow would hit 40,000 in 2009. Still up in the air is another wild forecast — which he doesn’t consider wild — that was the subject of a book he had published last year, a New York Times best seller, by the way: The Great Depression Ahead . We won’t have to wait too long to judge his accuracy on this score since he expects the second Great Depression to kick off later this year or in early 2011. What do you think? E-mail me at Dandordan@aol.com

Read the full article →

Video: Feinberg Discusses His Plan to Review Pay at 150 Firms: Video

May 6, 2010

May 6 (Bloomberg) — Kenneth Feinberg, the U.S. special master for executive compensation and founder of the Feinberg Group LLP, talks with Bloomberg’s Lori Rothman about his plan to examine the compensation practices of more than 150 companies that received U.S. government aid. Feinberg, 64, sought data covering a four-month period in 2008 and 2009 from firms including JPMorgan Chase & Co. and Goldman Sachs Group Inc. that received aid under the $700 billion Troubled Asset Relief Program. The review, required by law to determine whether any payments were inappropriate, covers employees earning more than $500,000 a year. (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Texas Billionaire Gerald Ford Will Invest $500 Million in Pacific Capital

April 29, 2010

By Nikolaj Gammeltoft April 29 (Bloomberg) — Texas billionaire Gerald J. Ford agreed to invest $500 million in Pacific Capital Bancorp to help the Santa Barbara, California-based bank recapitalize. Ford’s SB Acquisition Company LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Ford Financial Fund LP, reached a deal with the bank to give existing shareholders the right to buy common stock in Pacific Capital at 20 cents a share, the same price as Ford’s investment, Pacific Capital said in a statement today. The shares closed at $4.11 yesterday on the Nasdaq Stock Market, and dropped to $1.44 today after the announcement. Ford, the 65-year-old former chairman and chief executive officer of Golden State Bancorp Inc., will join Pacific Capital’s board of directors with Carl B. Webb , a senior principal at Ford Financial and the former president of Golden State. Ford will own 91 percent of the company’s common stock after the transaction is completed, according to the statement. “We determined that the Ford investment is in the best interests of the company and its stakeholders, and represents the most attractive alternative available,” George Leis , the bank’s president and chief executive officer, said in the statement. Pacific Capital received $180.6 million from the Treasury Department’s Troubled Asset Relief Program to help it survive the worldwide credit crunch. The company said last July it was exploring “strategic alternatives.” Sterling Financial Corp., the Spokane, Washington-based lender that posted more than $1 billion of losses in two years, said earlier this week that private-equity firm Thomas H. Lee Partners LP agreed to inject $134.7 million. To contact the reporter on this story: Nikolaj Gammeltoft in New York at ngammeltoft@bloomberg.net

Read the full article →

Treasury Plans Citigroup Stock Sale in Biggest Step to Exit U.S. Bailout

April 26, 2010

By Rebecca Christie April 26 (Bloomberg) — The U.S. Treasury Department plans to sell “up to” 1.5 billion shares of Citigroup Inc. in the government’s biggest step yet to exit the 27 percent ownership of the bank it rescued during the financial crisis. The Treasury will give its agent, Morgan Stanley , “discretionary authority” to sell the amount, and expects to give clearance to sell additional shares thereafter, the department said in an e-mailed statement today. “Treasury will begin selling its common shares in the market in an orderly fashion under a pre-arranged written trading plan.” The deal is part of a goal announced last month of selling about 7.7 billion shares the government received as part of New York-based Citigroup’s participation in the $700 billion Troubled Asset Relief Program. President Barack Obama is aiming to recoup “every single dime” of taxpayer money from the TARP fund after popular opposition to the Wall Street bailout. “We’re putting TARP out of its misery,” Treasury Secretary Timothy F. Geithner said in an interview with CNN television aired yesterday. “This is going to cost us much less in fiscal terms than even the S&L crisis,” he said, referring to the collapse of savings and loan banks in the 1980s and 1990s. Geithner said the government is withdrawing from the financial industry after forcing lenders to “recapitalize with private money.” SEC Filing Citigroup has filed a prospectus supplement on the sale with the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Treasury said in today’s statement. The department received the shares last year in exchange for $25 billion in preferred stock, at a price of $3.25 per common share. Citigroup closed at $4.86 on the New York Stock Exchange on April 23. Citigroup Chief Executive Officer Vikram Pandit said on April 20 at the bank’s annual shareholder meeting that he felt “a whole lot better” than he did a year ago and maintained that the bank is “positioned for growth.” The 1.5 billion share sale will be done under “certain parameters,” the Treasury said. The offering will be made only by means of a prospectus, and the government required Morgan Stanley to provide “opportunities for participation by small broker-dealers, including minority or women-owned broker dealers,” the statement said. The sale doesn’t cover the Treasury’s holdings of Citigroup trust preferred securities or warrants for its common stock, which will be disposed of separately, the department said. The Treasury said copies of the prospectus supplement and accompanying prospectus relating to the offering may be obtained by emailing prospectus@morganstanley.com , by calling toll-free in the United States 1-866-718-1649 and from the following address: Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated, Attn: Prospectus Department, 180 Varick Street, New York, NY 10014. Small and minority-owned dealers interested in participating in the offering may contact Morgan Stanley at ustdisposition@morganstanley.com by 5:00 p.m. New York time on April 27 for further information, the Treasury said. To contact the reporter on this story: Rebecca Christie in Washington at rchristie4@bloomberg.net

Read the full article →

Pay Czar Cuts Salaries For 65 Bailout Executives

April 16, 2010

WASHINGTON — The Treasury Department said Friday that five big companies still living on federal bailout money will see cash salaries for some of their top earners limited in 2010 so that only five of those executives in this group will be making cash salaries above $500,000. The Treasury Department said that would be a reduction from 65 officials in this group who sought cash compensation above $500,000 in 2009. The five firms involved are General Motors and its financing arm GMAC, Chrysler and its financing arm Chrysler Financial and insurance giant American International Group. These five companies are the only ones remaining under compensation restrictions supervised by Kenneth Feinberg, the Obama administration’s pay czar. On Friday, Treasury released Feinberg’s rulings for 2010 covering officials at the five companies below the top 25 executives at each firm. Those officials received their compensation rulings from Feinberg last month. Friday’s rulings cover executives from 26 to 100 at each of the companies. Treasury officials said that in this group, Treasury had gotten requests to award cash salaries above $500,000 for only five executives, down from requests received from 65 executives in this group last year. Treasury officials indicated that those five requests had been approved for 2010. In December, Feinberg told reporters that he had allowed about 12 officials in the group of 65 to receive cash compensation above the $500,000 cap. While these executives will have cash salaries capped at $500,000 this year, their total compensation can be much higher. However, that compensation must be paid in the form of stock with the executives only allowed to cash in those stock payments over a period of three years. Feinberg structured the compensation packages in this manner in an effort to tie executive performance to the performance of the company. The announcements Friday were the administration’s latest effort to deal with outrage over lucrative pay provided to executives of bailed-out companies while the public struggles with stagnant wages and high unemployment. Treasury refused to provide information on the size of the total compensation packages for the executives in the 26 to 100 group saying the law governing this compensation did not require this type of disclosure. For the top 25 executives at each of the five firms, Feinberg told reporters last month that they would see their pay cut by 15 percent this year although even with those reductions, many of them will make millions of dollars when their stock benefits are added. Feinberg’s initial pay rulings were announced last October for seven companies that had received the most money from the government’s $700 billion bailout fund. Since that time, Citigroup Inc. and Bank of America Corp. have paid back their government support and are no longer covered by the pay guidelines which only apply to companies receiving exceptional support from the bailout fund, known as the Troubled Asset Relief Program. (This version CORRECTS pvs number to 65 sted of 69 executives and expands number of companies to five)

Read the full article →

Oracle’s Ellison Highest-Paid CEO as Paychecks Shrink, New York Times Says

April 4, 2010

By Dan Hart April 4 (Bloomberg) — Larry Ellison , chief executive officer of Oracle Corp. , was the highest-paid U.S. CEO last year as compensation fell for the second straight year amid the recession, the New York Times reported. Ellison received $84.5 million, all but $6.1 million of it in stock options, the newspaper said, citing a study by Equilar . The median total compensation for U.S. executives declined 13 percent to $7.7 million, while average total pay fell 15 percent to $9.5 million for chief executives at their companies at least two years, the newspaper said, citing the survey by executive compensation tracker Equilar. The median compensation for executives of companies receiving funds from the U.S. government’s Troubled Asset Relief Program, or TARP, was $6 million, down 34 percent from a year earlier. The median cash payout for the group rose 20 percent, while the stock and options component fell 94 percent and 92 percent, respectively, the newspaper said. Equilar’s study for the Times covered 199 public companies with 2009 revenue of at least $5.78 billion that filed annual proxy statements by March 26, the newspaper said. Boston Scientific Corp. ’s Raymond Elliott was second in the ranking with $33.4 million, including a bonus of $2.1 million, the newspaper said. Ray Irani , chief executive of Occidental Petroleum Corp. , was third with $31.4 million, up 39 percent from a year earlier, the newspaper said. Hewlett-Packard Co. ’s Mark Hurd saw his compensation decline 29 percent to $24.2 million, which included a $15.8 million bonus, in placing fourth in the survey, the newspaper said. James Hackett , chief executive of Anadarko Petroleum Corp. , was fifth with $23.5 million, most of that in restricted stock and stock options, the newspaper said. Rounding out the top 10 in sixth through 10th place, respectively, were: Alan Lafley , Procter & Gamble Co., $23.5 million; William Weldon , Johnson & Johnson, $22.8 million; Miles White , Abbott Laboratories, $21.9 million; Robert Iger , Walt Disney Co., $21.6 million; and Sam Palmisano , International Business Machines Corp., $21.2 million, the Times said. To contact the reporter on this story: Dan Hart in Washington at dahart@bloomberg.net .

Read the full article →

Oracle’s Ellison Highest-Paid CEO as Paychecks Shrink, New York Times Says

April 4, 2010

By Dan Hart April 4 (Bloomberg) — Larry Ellison , chief executive officer of Oracle Corp. , was the highest-paid U.S. CEO last year as compensation fell for the second straight year amid the recession, the New York Times reported. Ellison received $84.5 million, all but $6.1 million of it in stock options, the newspaper said, citing a study by Equilar . The median total compensation for U.S. executives declined 13 percent to $7.7 million, while average total pay fell 15 percent to $9.5 million for chief executives at their companies at least two years, the newspaper said, citing the survey by executive compensation tracker Equilar. The median compensation for executives of companies receiving funds from the U.S. government’s Troubled Asset Relief Program, or TARP, was $6 million, down 34 percent from a year earlier. The median cash payout for the group rose 20 percent, while the stock and options component fell 94 percent and 92 percent, respectively, the newspaper said. Equilar’s study for the Times covered 199 public companies with 2009 revenue of at least $5.78 billion that filed annual proxy statements by March 26, the newspaper said. Boston Scientific Corp. ’s Raymond Elliott was second in the ranking with $33.4 million, including a bonus of $2.1 million, the newspaper said. Ray Irani , chief executive of Occidental Petroleum Corp. , was third with $31.4 million, up 39 percent from a year earlier, the newspaper said. Hewlett-Packard Co. ’s Mark Hurd saw his compensation decline 29 percent to $24.2 million, which included a $15.8 million bonus, in placing fourth in the survey, the newspaper said. James Hackett , chief executive of Anadarko Petroleum Corp. , was fifth with $23.5 million, most of that in restricted stock and stock options, the newspaper said. Rounding out the top 10 in sixth through 10th place, respectively, were: Alan Lafley , Procter & Gamble Co., $23.5 million; William Weldon , Johnson & Johnson, $22.8 million; Miles White , Abbott Laboratories, $21.9 million; Robert Iger , Walt Disney Co., $21.6 million; and Sam Palmisano , International Business Machines Corp., $21.2 million, the Times said. To contact the reporter on this story: Dan Hart in Washington at dahart@bloomberg.net .

Read the full article →

Oracle’s Ellison Highest-Paid CEO as Paychecks Shrink, New York Times Says

April 4, 2010

By Dan Hart April 4 (Bloomberg) — Larry Ellison , chief executive officer of Oracle Corp. , was the highest-paid U.S. CEO last year as compensation fell for the second straight year amid the recession, the New York Times reported. Ellison received $84.5 million, all but $6.1 million of it in stock options, the newspaper said, citing a study by Equilar . The median total compensation for U.S. executives declined 13 percent to $7.7 million, while average total pay fell 15 percent to $9.5 million for chief executives at their companies at least two years, the newspaper said, citing the survey by executive compensation tracker Equilar. The median compensation for executives of companies receiving funds from the U.S. government’s Troubled Asset Relief Program, or TARP, was $6 million, down 34 percent from a year earlier. The median cash payout for the group rose 20 percent, while the stock and options component fell 94 percent and 92 percent, respectively, the newspaper said. Equilar’s study for the Times covered 199 public companies with 2009 revenue of at least $5.78 billion that filed annual proxy statements by March 26, the newspaper said. Boston Scientific Corp. ’s Raymond Elliott was second in the ranking with $33.4 million, including a bonus of $2.1 million, the newspaper said. Ray Irani , chief executive of Occidental Petroleum Corp. , was third with $31.4 million, up 39 percent from a year earlier, the newspaper said. Hewlett-Packard Co. ’s Mark Hurd saw his compensation decline 29 percent to $24.2 million, which included a $15.8 million bonus, in placing fourth in the survey, the newspaper said. James Hackett , chief executive of Anadarko Petroleum Corp. , was fifth with $23.5 million, most of that in restricted stock and stock options, the newspaper said. Rounding out the top 10 in sixth through 10th place, respectively, were: Alan Lafley , Procter & Gamble Co., $23.5 million; William Weldon , Johnson & Johnson, $22.8 million; Miles White , Abbott Laboratories, $21.9 million; Robert Iger , Walt Disney Co., $21.6 million; and Sam Palmisano , International Business Machines Corp., $21.2 million, the Times said. To contact the reporter on this story: Dan Hart in Washington at dahart@bloomberg.net .

Read the full article →

Geithner: Bailouts ‘Deeply Unfair,’ Financial System Was Run In A ‘Crazy Way’ (VIDEO)

April 1, 2010

WASHINGTON (AP) – Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner said Thursday it’s “deeply unfair” that some financial institutions that got taxpayer-paid bailouts are emerging in better shape from the recession than millions of ordinary Americans. He acknowledged public outrage over that and said people watched with disdain as Washington protected high-risk banks and investment houses, even as the national unemployment rate was soaring to double-digit levels for the first time in a generation. But in a nationally broadcast interview, Geithner also argued that President Barack Obama had no choice when confronted with a financial crisis. “As the president has said, we had to do some very unpopular things,” Geithner said. “People looked at what had happened.” WATCH the interview: Visit msnbc.com for breaking news , world news , and news about the economy “It’s not fair. It’s deeply unfair,” he said. “He (Obama) had to decide whether he was going to act to fix it or stand back … and that would have been calamitous for the American economy.” The government eventually embarked on a program of assisting the threatened financial institutions, and the sweeping, multibillion-dollar Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) created as a bailout engine. Geithner also said that administration officials are “very worried” about recovering the more than 8 million jobs lost in the recession. But he noted that business growth has been improving and expects the economy “is going to start creating jobs again.” The secretary agreed that the national jobless rate — now at 9.7 percent — is “still terribly high and is going to stay unacceptably high for a very long time” because of the damage caused by the recession. “Just because this was the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression,” Geithner said, “a huge amount of damage was done to businesses and families across the country … and it’s going to take us a long time to heal that damage. ” More than 11 million people now are drawing unemployment insurance benefits, and the overall jobless rate of 9.7 percent understates the true level of economic misery because many people who give up looking for work are no longer in the official count of the unemployed. The Bureau of Labor Statistics on Friday will release a report on conditions in the labor markets in March. Geithner said he hopes skeptical voters will note legislation moving through Congress to bring reforms to the financial system. “What happened in our country should never happen again,” he said. “People were paid for taking enormous risks. It was a crazy way to run a financial system.” Geithner said, “It’s the government’s job … to do a better job of restraining that kind of risk-taking.” The Geithner interview was broadcast Thursday on NBC’s “Today” show. (This version CORRECTS Corrects time element in last graf. Moving on general news and financial services.)

Read the full article →

Video: FHA’s Stevens Says Housing `More Stable’ Thanks to Aid: Video

March 26, 2010

March 26 (Bloomberg) — Federal Housing Administration Commissioner David Stevens talks with Bloomberg’s Margaret Brennan about the U.S. housing market. The Obama administration today announced programs to help U.S. homeowners avoid foreclosure, including subsidies for borrowers who owe more than their home is worth. The plan expands Treasury Department and FHA efforts and uses funds from the $700 billion Troubled Asset Relief Program. (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Video: FHA’s Stevens Says Housing `More Stable’ Thanks to Aid: Video

March 26, 2010

March 26 (Bloomberg) — Federal Housing Administration Commissioner David Stevens talks with Bloomberg’s Margaret Brennan about the U.S. housing market. The Obama administration today announced programs to help U.S. homeowners avoid foreclosure, including subsidies for borrowers who owe more than their home is worth. The plan expands Treasury Department and FHA efforts and uses funds from the $700 billion Troubled Asset Relief Program. (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Paymaster Feinberg Reduces Cash Pay by One-Third at Five U.S. Companies

March 24, 2010

By Robert Schmidt and Ian Katz March 24 (Bloomberg) — American International Group Inc. and four other companies overseen by Obama administration paymaster Kenneth Feinberg were told to cut cash compensation to top executives by 33 percent from last year. Total pay in 2010, including cash, will fall by about 15 percent for 119 executives at AIG, General Motors Co., GMAC Inc. , Chrysler Group LLC and Chrysler Financial Corp. , Feinberg said at a press briefing in Washington yesterday. Still, his rulings showed 69 of them will get $1 million or more, including long-term restricted stock payable only in future years. “It’s a different economy than it was a year ago, and companies have started feeling like there’s more wiggle room today,” said David Wise , a senior consultant at Hay Group, a Philadelphia-based management consulting firm. “But these pay cuts are going to make every board member in America feel less secure about their pay decisions.” Five of the 119 will receive cash salaries of $1 million or more, with AIG Chief Executive Officer Robert Benmosche getting the most at $3 million. Benmosche’s total pay, including long- term stock awards, is $10.5 million. No one at Chrysler or GMAC will get a salary of more than $500,000. “We’re trying to continue to lower overall total compensation” for the top executives, Feinberg said. He singled out Benmosche for “ specific mention and praise” for his cooperation. Bank Repayments Feinberg, 64, was appointed last June to monitor pay of executives at seven bailed-out companies, including Citigroup Inc. and Bank of America Corp., which repaid taxpayer funds and escaped Feinberg’s supervision in December. Of that group, 39 left the seven companies before Feinberg ordered cuts averaging 50 percent in October, and another 18 departed since then. About 85 percent of executives whose pay was evaluated last year are still with their companies, Feinberg said. The statistics “undercut the argument that I have heard all along that if you don’t pay more and give more salaries and higher salaries, people will leave,” Feinberg said. “They are not leaving, and I am comforted by that fact.” Feinberg said he will also review compensation at 419 companies given rescue funds, including JPMorgan Chase & Co. and Goldman Sachs Group Inc. , for a four-month period of 2008 and 2009. Firms participating in the $700 billion Troubled Asset Relief Program are being sent 25- to 30-page questionnaires seeking pay data for that period and must respond within 30 days. The seven companies initially under Feinberg’s supervision will receive the most scrutiny, he said. Bailout Period The period spans from October 2008, when bailout funds were first awarded, to February 2009, when President Barack Obama signed economic stimulus legislation that included curbs on executive pay at companies that got U.S. funds. The law requires a review of whether payments at the firms are in “the public interest.” Feinberg, who doesn’t have legal authority to recoup compensation at the firms in the broader review, said he may use the “bully pulpit” of his position to get executives to return money. He also said he “probably” will identify by name executives who got compensation he deems excessive. In making decisions, Feinberg said he would take into account whether the firms followed principles he has previously outlined, such as tying compensation to long-term performance. Repaying taxpayers will be looked on favorably, he said. “If a company has completely repaid the taxpayer with interest, that makes it much easier to conclude” that the firm’s compensation was appropriate, Feinberg said. As special master on compensation, Feinberg must also review the pay structures, though not the amounts, for the 26th to 100th highest-paid employees at the five companies. He said he plans to release his rulings on those in April. To contact the reporters on this story: Robert Schmidt in Washington at rschmidt5@bloomberg.net ; Ian Katz in Washington at ikatz2@bloomberg.net .

Read the full article →

Pay Czar Kenneth Feinberg To Review Executive Pay At Bailed-Out Banks

March 22, 2010

NEW YORK — The Obama administration’s pay czar is launching a review of compensation for 25 top executives at all financial firms that received federal bailout money, according to three people familiar with the plan. Kenneth Feinberg can seek to renegotiate any pay deemed not in the public’s interest but can’t forcibly recoup funds, government and banking industry officials told The Associated Press on Monday. Feinberg is to announce the review Tuesday, according to the officials, who requested anonymity because they weren’t authorized to discuss the plan publicly. The review is required under the federal law that created Feinberg’s position. It will mainly focus on the 2008 pay awarded to five senior executives and the next 20 highest paid employees at 419 firms that benefited from the $700 billion Troubled Asset Relief Program. The companies will be asked to turn over compensation data paid to those employees through Feb. 17, 2009, according to the officials. CEOs at many large banks gave up bonuses in 2008 amid sharp criticism of outsized Wall Street pay packages. Feinberg’s review will seek to determine whether other employees received pay deemed excessive or contrary to the public’s best interest. But his authority will be far more limited than the power he had over seven companies deemed to have received what the government extraordinary taxpayer assistance. Since Citigroup Inc. and Bank of America Corp. repaid their bailouts, Feinberg now has direct oversight of GMAC, American International Group Inc., General Motors Co., Chrysler and Chrysler Financial. Feinberg is also expected to announce 2010 pay packages for those companies on Tuesday. Last month, Feinberg criticized as “outrageous” bonus payments totalling $100 million to AIG employees from the same unit that nearly toppled the firm. Feinberg was unable to stop the so-called retention bonuses, which were contractual obligations agreed upon before the insurer received a $180 billion federal rescue at the height of the financial crisis in late 2008. In October, Feinberg ruled that the top 25 executives at companies receiving exceptional assistance from the bailout fund would have their pay capped in most cases at $500,000 for 2009. They were required to receive additional compensation in the form of company stock paid out over three years, to try to tie their performance to the fate of their companies. Even before Feinberg’s decision, banks that had received billions in government aid to cope with the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression had been scrambling to repay the government so they could escape the TARP restrictions. Still, the banks have been responding to criticism of their pay practices, paying more in stock that cannot be immediately sold rather than in cash. ___ Wagner reported from Washington.

Read the full article →

Bailout Watchdog To Shine Light On Mortgage Program

March 17, 2010

WASHINGTON — The federal bank bailout watchdog is planning to scrutinize the formula used by mortgage companies to evaluate borrowers for the Obama administration $75 billion mortgage relief program. Neil Barofsky, the special inspector general for the Troubled Asset Relief Program, will examine whether the more than 100 companies participating in the program are using the formula correctly. Barofsky disclosed his plans in a letter this week to Sen. Jeff Merkley, D-Ore. The formula is designed to calculate whether lenders are better off foreclosing or modifying the loan so borrowers can get back on track with payments. Housing counselors complain that many borrowers who are denied are not given a clear explanation.

Read the full article →

Reggie Middleton: The Uncosted Rewards of Bankers’ Bonuses

March 11, 2010

This post originally appeared on the Financial Times’ website, thebanker.com A bank employee recently asked me: “As a trader, my bonus is derived directly from my profit and loss, which is accrued over the quarter and kept in a separate account. It does not go into the firm’s bottom line and then back out to me. Also, like most traders, I accrue 2% of my gains in a loss provision account in case I have a major write-down in the year. My bonus is 10% of my profit for the year. If I make $50m for the year my bonus is $5m. What does my bonus have to do with the mortgage-backed securities [MBS] trader who is sitting on losses? Did I or did I not show a profit of $40m to the firm’s bottom line?” Main Street is absolutely flabbergasted that bankers do not understand the core issues of this bonus question. Allow me to clearly outline the problem and propose a solution. Assuming this trader works for a prominent US bank that received a bailout, he is not entitled to a $5m bonus if he made $50m for the year. Why not? Because he generated that 10% return from taxpayer capital, not firm capital. For example, Goldman Sachs would have had the drawdown from purgatory had it not been rescued from a $30bn credit default swap deal with AIG. Let’s assume AIG would have negotiated a 40% payout to Goldman Sachs, which is realistic given that litigation with an insolvent company that had many more contingent and direct claims would probably have resulted in a lower net receipt to Goldman. This alone would have resulted in a hole of about $7.8bn for the bank. Taxpayer assistance Combined with the Troubled Asset Relief Program, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation bond guarantees, Public-Private Investment Programme for legacy assets and other alphabet programmes, not to mention hundreds of billions of dollars in MBS purchases that have put an artificial bid under toxic assets that abound on big bank balance sheets, it is clear to see that banks were undercapitalised and benefited greatly from taxpayer assistance. Without that assistance, the trader would not have had $50m to trade and may not have had an employer at all. It really is that simple and there is no need to debate whether he deserves 10%. The real issue is 10% of what? He is relying on a 10% bookmakers’ fee for betting with taxpayer contingent capital – not pure bank capital, and that is where the great misunderstanding lies. Even if one could justify getting paid from taxpayer capital in lieu of firm capital, the taxpayer capital should (as a product of prudent business practice) have been pegged to an appropriate ‘cost’, whose hurdle rate the trader would need to overcome. In other words, management should say: “This $50m costs us 14% in coupons on government-owned preference shares, thus you will not have positive return on investment until you break that 14% mark.” If the trader failed to breach the 14% hurdle rate, he would not have received a bonus at all. Simplifying risk and return Now, I am sure many are quipping: “Well, how is a bank supposed to incentivise a trader if a negative return does not fund a bonus?” But think about it for just a moment, and you will see the implications. If the risk-adjusted cost of capital causes a business to become unprofitable – either for the employee or the firm – then neither the employee nor the firm should be in that particular line of business. The plan is ingenious in its simplicity and creates a self-regulating mechanism that prevents risks from being decoupled from rewards. This also applies to exotic derivatives transactions where in-built leverage allows for little or no upfront capital. You reserve properly for risks (counterparty, credit and market) and charge the cost of capital on the reserves. This plan works for bankers too. Mergers and acquisition bankers use minimal firm capital, thus have relatively minimal economic hurdles to overcome. Hence, the banker would likely get a higher payout than the trader because he risked less capital, but he would still have to be paid via staggered or cliff vesting (depending on the nature of the deal) with restricted stock. In this scenario, bankers would not put together deals in a fashion that runs counter to the interests of the firm’s stakeholders (at least not on purpose or through wilful negligence). Now bankers and traders become true economic partners in the firm, sharing both the reward and the risk of doing the deal – just like in the real world. Reggie Middleton is an independent investor and financial analyst with experience ranging from insurance-linked securities structuring to real estate investment. See boombustblog.com.

Read the full article →

Baucus Says Bank Bonus-Tax Proposal Is Unlikely to Get Vote in U.S. Senate

March 7, 2010

By Brian Faler March 6 (Bloomberg) — The U.S. Senate is unlikely to vote on a measure that would impose a 50 percent tax on bonuses awarded last year to executives of Wall Street firms bailed out by the government, a top Democrat said. Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus said yesterday that, while he couldn’t rule out the possibility that the tax proposal would be voted on as an amendment to a jobs bill, the “chances are low” because of opposition from lawmakers in both parties. “Some Republicans don’t want it; some Democrats don’t want it,” Baucus, a Montana Democrat, said in an interview. Asked what he thought of the amendment, he said “it’s a jobs bill” and “we can’t solve all the world’s problems with one bill.” Jessica Smith, a spokeswoman for Democratic Senator Jim Webb of Virginia, a sponsor of the tax proposal, agreed that a vote is “not looking likely.” Under Senate practice, lawmakers from the two parties negotiate which proposed amendments to a pending bill will be allowed floor votes and which will be dropped. Webb and Senator Barbara Boxer , a California Democrat, have been pushing the amendment that would tax the portion of bonuses topping $400,000 given to executives at banks that received at least $5 billion from the Treasury Department’s Troubled Asset Relief Program. The effort by the two senators sparked a last-minute lobbying campaign by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, the Financial Services Roundtable and other groups opposing the plan. The Chamber of Commerce, in urging lawmakers to reject the idea, said in a letter it “would likely hamper efforts to resolve the ongoing financial crisis, restore economic growth, spur job creation and is likely unconstitutional.” The $150 billion jobs measure the Senate is debating would extend unemployment benefits through the end of this year, provide state governments with $25 billion in aid, extend a package of miscellaneous tax cuts and postpone scheduled cuts in Medicare reimbursements to doctors. Democrats said they aim to complete work on the bill by early next week. To contact the reporters on this story: Brian Faler  in Washington at   or bfaler@bloomberg.net

Read the full article →

U.S. Probes of TARP Misconduct Rose 41% in Fourth Quarter, Watchdog Says

January 31, 2010

By Joshua Gallu Jan. 31 (Bloomberg) — The U.S. Troubled Asset Relief Program’s watchdog expanded investigations into misconduct in the $700 billion federal bank rescue program, increasing the number of opened cases by 41 percent in the fourth quarter. Special Inspector General Neil Barofsky began 25 criminal and civil probes in the quarter, and had 77 total active cases, according to a quarterly report to Congress published today. Through the third quarter of 2009, the Washington-based office opened 61 cases with 54 active, he said at the time. Examiners are looking into possible wrongdoing related to the financial-industry bailout, including insider trading, accounting violations, mortgage fraud, public corruption, obstruction of justice and money laundering, according to the report. Barofsky didn’t identify the targets of pending investigations, although details on a few cases have emerged. Barofsky confirmed last week he is probing whether the Federal Reserve Bank of New York improperly limited release of information about payments to American International Group Inc.’s counterparties when the insurer was rescued. AIG’s first rescue was an $85 billion credit line from the New York Fed. The bailout was expanded three times and is now valued at $182.3 billion. Barofsky is also working with the Securities and Exchange Commission, Justice Department and the Federal Bureau of Investigation on the investigation into Bank of America’s merger with Merrill Lynch, the report said. Barofsky, based in Washington, is opening a branch office in New York and satellite offices in Los Angeles and San Francisco to support the investigations. Calls to Barfosky’s toll-free hotline phone number rose 41 percent in the quarter, to 9,900, according to the report. To contact the reporters on this story: Joshua Gallu in Washington at jgallu@bloomberg.net

Read the full article →

U.S. Senate Democrats Said to Consider $80 Billion Jobs-Stimulus Package

January 26, 2010

By Brian Faler Jan. 26 (Bloomberg) — Lawmakers are set to consider a jobs-stimulus package totaling about $80 billion that would provide tax credits to small and medium-sized businesses that hire workers, a Democratic senator said. The plan, to be presented today to Senate Democrats, would include aid to state governments to prevent layoffs and additional funding for infrastructure projects, said the senator, who asked not be identified. The package also will likely include energy-related provisions such as incentives to weatherize homes, a Senate aide said. Democratic leaders hope to have the measure on the Senate floor by the second week in February, the aide said, speaking on condition of anonymity. The proposal is smaller than an economic aid package approved last month by the House, in part because lawmakers plan to approve extensions in unemployment benefits costing tens of billions as part of separate legislation. The House plan, costing more than $150 billion, eschewed small business tax cuts in favor of spending $53 billion to extend unemployment benefits including so-called COBRA subsidies to help the jobless buy health insurance. The Senate proposal comes as lawmakers find themselves under growing pressure, underscored by Republican Scott Brown ’s win in last week’s special U.S. Senate race in Massachusetts, to boost the economy before this year’s midterm elections. At the same time, lawmakers are trying to show voters they are serious about taming the government’s spiraling budget deficits. Pelosi’s Lobbying That tension could be seen last month when House Speaker Nancy Pelosi , a California Democrat, had to personally work the chamber floor to win support for that chamber’s jobs package from party colleagues concerned about adding to the government’s $1.4 trillion deficit. The bill passed 217-212, with 38 Democrats voting against it. No Republicans supported the measure. The House plan would be partially financed by tapping unused money in the Treasury Department’s Troubled Asset Relief Program, a proposal Republicans have called a budget gimmick because they say those funds would probably otherwise never be spent. Republicans, who have been highly critical of the $787 billion stimulus package Congress passed last February, will have enough Senate votes to block the chamber’s aid plan once Brown is sworn into office. To contact the reporters on this story: Brian Faler in Washington at bfaler@bloomberg.net ; James Rowley in Washington at jarowley@bloomberg.net

Read the full article →

Goldman Sachs Said to Limit London Partners’ Pay, Bonuses to $1.6 Million

January 25, 2010

By Ambereen Choudhury Jan. 25 (Bloomberg) — Goldman Sachs Group Inc. , the most profitable securities firm in Wall Street history, will cap the salary and bonuses of its London partners at 1 million pounds ($1.6 million) amid anger about the size of investment bankers’ pay, said a person familiar with the situation. The decision will affect about 100 employees in London, said the person, who declined to be identified because the plan is private. Some traders may make more than 1 million pounds, the person said. Goldman Sachs staff will be told of their bonuses from today, the person said. New York-based Goldman Sachs, which set a Wall Street pay record in 2007, has been attacked by labor unions for its compensation practices after getting taxpayer aid during the credit crisis. In response, the company subtracted $519 million from its pay pool in the fourth quarter and made $500 million in charitable donations. That brought full-year pay costs to $16.2 billion, or 36 percent of revenue, the smallest portion since the firm went public in 1999. Politicians in the U.K. and U.S. are preparing to levy taxes on banks that received public bailouts. The Treasury last month said it would impose a 50 percent tax on bonuses of more than 25,000 pounds. The Obama administration this month proposed charging a fee on all banks holding assets exceeding $50 billion to recoup the costs of bailing out lenders. Goldman Sachs repaid the $10 billion of government money it received under the Troubled Asset Relief Program with interest in June. Barclays, Credit Suisse An official at Goldman Sachs in London declined to comment. The Sunday Times, which reported the limit earlier, said some Goldman Sachs employees have received bonuses of more than 10 million pounds in previous years. Barclays Plc, the U.K.’s second-largest bank, plans to defer bonuses for top executives including Chief Executive Officer John Varley for as many as three years, the Financial Times reported last week. The bank may defer payment of its 11 board members’ bonuses for as long as 36 months, the London-based newspaper said, citing people it didn’t identify. Credit Suisse Group AG, the largest Swiss bank by market value, is trimming its global bonus pool by 5 percent to spread the cost of the U.K. bonus tax, with senior employees in London having their bonus pool cut by a further 30 percent from planned levels. JPMorgan Chase & Co. set aside $549 million for compensation costs in the fourth quarter, the least amount since at least 2004. To contact the reporter on this story: Ambereen Choudhury in London achoudhury@bloomberg.net

Read the full article →

Flaherty Says Canada Won’t Follow U.S. Plan for Financial-Institutions Fee

January 12, 2010

By Theophilos Argitis Jan. 12 (Bloomberg) — Canadian Finance Minister Jim Flaherty ruled out following U.S. plans to impose a fee on financial institutions to reduce record budget deficits. Speaking in an interview in Swift Current, Saskatchewan, Flaherty said that because Canadian banks weren’t bailed out during the financial crisis, as they were in the U.S., plans for a fee on banks are “not an issue for us.” President Barack Obama plans to raise as much as $120 billion through a fee on financial institutions to help recoup losses from the Troubled Asset Relief Program and reduce the deficit , according to a U.S. administration official. “We have not had financial institutions fail in Canada and cost taxpayers billions of dollars which is what has happened in the United States and the United Kingdom and some other places,” Flaherty, 60, said. Canada didn’t need to bail out any of its banks, even as the U.S. spent more than $400 billion to support institutions, including American International Group Inc. and Citigroup Inc. The country’s 21 banks weathered seizures in credit markets last year without government aid partly because Canada’s higher capital requirements and loan limits helped lenders avoid most of the writedowns and losses that crippled global competitors, even as the nation’s economy slipped into a recession. The U.K. government has placed a 50 percent tax on bank employee bonuses of more than 25,000 pounds ($40,400), leading London Mayor Boris Johnson to suggest that higher taxes may drive 9,000 bankers out of the country. Flaherty said he “was aware that some consideration was being given to that subject in the United States government. There is a question about what would be satisfactory to the Senate and the Congress in the United States.” To contact the reporter on this story: Theophilos Argitis in Swift Current at targitis@bloomberg.net

Read the full article →

Bank of America Sees Record Bonus for Top Performers, No Increase in Total

January 7, 2010

By David Mildenberg Jan. 8 (Bloomberg) — Bank of America Corp. , the biggest U.S. lender, expects to pay record bonuses to some investment bankers while keeping the overall cost of incentive compensation below previous years, according to a company spokesman. “Some people will be getting very good bonuses because they had a very good year,” spokesman Robert Stickler said. The overall pool “will not be a record,” he said. Bank of America repaid $45 billion in U.S. bank-rescue assistance in December, freeing the Charlotte, North Carolina- based lender from federal pay restrictions. Bonuses paid to Merrill Lynch & Co. executives before Bank of America completed its takeover of the brokerage in January 2009 prompted federal and state probes and a shareholder revolt that stripped Chief Executive Officer Kenneth D. Lewis of the chairman’s title. Lewis retired on Dec. 31 and was replaced by Brian T. Moynihan . Bank of America’s management is determining the total earmarked for incentive-based compensation, Stickler said. The sum must get approval by the company’s board around the end of January, he said. The Wall Street Journal reported on Bank of America’s bonus plans in its online edition yesterday. Incentive pay is based on individual, business unit and overall company performance , Stickler said. Fees from the company’s investment bank and capital markets businesses ranked second in 2009 among Wall Street firms, trailing only New York-based JPMorgan Chase & Co. Moynihan said Jan. 4 the fees reflected the success of the Merrill Lynch takeover. “Clearly investment banking at Bank of America had a pretty good year, so you’d expect year-end incentives would reflect that,” Stickler said. Quarterly Results Later this month, Bank of America as a whole may report its third loss in the past five quarters, amounting to 52 cents a share, according to the average estimate of 17 analysts surveyed by Bloomberg. Defaults on home loans, commercial real estate and credit cards have prompted the bank to charge off more than $25 billion through Sept. 30. Repaying funds to the Troubled Asset Relief Program may have reduced income available to common shareholders by $4.1 billion, the bank said last month. Merrill reported a $27.6 billion loss in 2008, its last year as an independent company. Bank of America rose 54 cents, or 3.3 percent, to $16.93 yesterday in New York Stock Exchange composite trading . To contact the reporter on this story: David Mildenberg in Charlotte at dmildenberg@bloomberg.net

Read the full article →