warren-buffett

Huffington Post…

Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (NYSE: BRK-B, BRK-A) and Warren Buffett have just released the latest holdings of U.S.-listed equities as of March 31, 2011 for the Q2-2011 holdings. These public stock holdings have been broken down into two groups of ‘A to L’ and ‘M to Z’ so it is more concise and clear to see the path of changes. Here are Warren Buffett’s holdings and accompanying notes on each for the group ‘A to L’ in shares. When the recent earnings came out, we did see that the equity holdings’ value at March 31 grew to over $61.8 billion from $59.8 billion as of December 31, 2010.

Here is the original post:
What Stocks Is Warren Buffett Buying?

Find our Weekly Commercial Real Estate, Private Equity and Fund Newsletters at www.WeeklyBrief.net

{ 0 comments }

Huffington Post…

OMAHA, Nebraska (Ben Berkowitz) – Warren Buffett does not spend his time making stock research recommendations, but he is sure of one thing — America should have a “strong buy” slapped on it. Tens of thousands of Berkshire Hathaway shareholders who descended on Omaha this weekend for the conglomerate’s annual meeting got one unmistakable message from Buffett — no matter how bad the economy, or the deficit, or the political divide, the United States is as good a place to live and work as ever. “I don’t see how anybody can be other than enthused about this country,” Buffett told Berkshire shareholders on Saturday. Buffett, often called the “Oracle of Omaha,” is one of the world’s richest men and leads a conglomerate that owns railroads, insurers and ice cream parlors. The comments echo those Buffett made in February in his annual shareholder letter, but the words still may encourage investors looking sideways at the country, particularly after Standard & Poor’s put the U.S. government’s critical “AAA” credit rating on a negative credit watch. Buffett told Reuters Insider that S&P’s move was premature, given the U.S. government issues debt only in dollars and can simply print more money to pay debt if absolutely needed. “The United States is not going to default on any obligation,” Buffett told Insider in an interview after the annual meeting. “We are not a credit risk, believe me.” Where Buffett’s enthusiasm wanes to any degree, it is mostly in conversation on the dollar, which he said is sure to weaken over time, like most other currencies. Buffett, as usual, said he was shying away from fixed-income investments for Berkshire’s part, even as he keeps some of his personal wealth in Treasuries for safety’s sake. Some worry that safety could be threatened by the debate over the national debt ceiling, an issue that has divided Congress in recent weeks and gotten more tense as the country gets closer to its legal limit on debt issuance. Buffett, asked about the possibility Congress would not raise the ceiling, made one of his most-repeated comments of the whole weekend, saying it would be the legislature’s “most asinine act” in its history. Buffett also affirmed his support for the banking sector, where he has big bets on Wells Fargo and U.S. Bancorp, calling the odds of another banking crisis “very very low.” His partner, Vice Chairman Charlie Munger, was less sanguine about Europe and the effects of the sovereign debt crisis, saying the continent has “a hell of a problem” in comparison. (Reporting by Ben Berkowitz, editing by Maureen Bavdek, Bernard Orr) Copyright 2011 Thomson Reuters. Click for Restrictions .

See original here:
Buffett: Not Raising Debt Ceiling Would Be An ‘Asinine Act’

Find our Weekly Commercial Real Estate, Private Equity and Fund Newsletters at www.WeeklyBrief.net

{ 0 comments }

Yashar Hedayat: Give Warren Buffett a Break and Fight the Real Enemy

May 1, 2011

Yesterday, 40,000 Berkshire Hathaway shareholders gathered in Omaha, Nebraska for the holding company’s annual shareholder meeting. But a dark cloud hung over the gathering, which is usually so jovial that it’s been dubbed “Woodstock for Capitalists.” On March 28th, David Sokol, heir apparent to Berkshire CEO Warren Buffett, resigned from his position at Berkshire Hathaway citing “personal reasons.” But instead of the perfunctory half-page press release praising Mr. Sokol’s leadership and wishing him well, the resignation was announced via a two-page letter from Warren Buffett. What came as a surprise to many, the second page of that letter provided background on the Berkshire Hathaway acquisition of chemicals company Lubrizol and exposed that Mr. Sokol had purchased a block of shares while he was advising Berkshire to acquire the company (yesterday, Mr. Buffett took the blame for not asking Mr. Sokol when he purchased the shares ). Since his resignation, an audit committee report from the company’s board has been released that states that Mr. Sokol not only violated internal insider trading policies (Berkshire’s standards are much higher than is required to violate the law), but also Berkshire’s company code of ethics. The report also accused Mr. Sokol of not being forthcoming on a number of matters related to the Lubrizol transaction; including somehow forgetting to inform Mr. Buffett that the only reason he suggested that Berkshire Hathaway acquire Lubrizol was due to advice from Citibank’s investment bankers about possible acquisitions that Berkshire could make. Mr. Sokol should be ashamed of himself. He has not only done damage to Berkshire Hathaway, its shareholders, but also anytime an executive of a public company doesn’t follow basic ethical standards, it damages the confidence investors and consumers have in our financial system. Mr. Sokol’s actions have also unfairly impugned the reputation of Berkshire Hathaway CEO Warren Buffett. Since his resignation, members of the press and bloggers who cover the financial industry have castigated Buffett for a myriad of offenses ranging from his lack of ethical standards, his age, and they have even gone after his investment performance. Some of the headlines: “Warren Buffett’s Mistake: How the Saint of Capitalist Damaged His Reputation” “Berkshire Board Tries Cleaning Up Buffett’s Mess” “The Buffett Judgment Question” “America’s Turning Against Ol’ Warren Buffett” The same reporters and analysts also spent a great deal of time going after Buffett in 1999 for not jumping on the high-tech bandwagon and spent virtually no time looking into why he thought it was foolish to invest in an extremely over-valued sector . I am not saying that those who manage public companies should be not be held to the highest of standards. But I must say the tone that the press has taken towards Mr. Buffett was largely absent during the financial crisis of 2008 when financial executives nearly obliterated our economy through years of fiscal misdeeds. Let’s remember how Berkshire, under Mr. Buffett’s leadership, reacted to the Sokol affair. A press release announcing Mr. Sokol’s resignation offered a background on the basis of his resignation. It was not brought out by an investigative reporter, not through congressional hearings where Mr. Buffett had to be harangued by a member of Congress, nor an FBI or SEC investigation. Mr. Buffett elected to expose the information voluntarily. After his resignation, there was an exhaustive and detailed audit report released. What else could Buffett have done? It is clear that he was not aware of Mr. Sokol’s actions (I think most people agree on that fact). Can he be accused of a sin of omission by not asking when Sokol purchased his shares? Perhaps. But that is hardly worthy of the punishment he has received by the press. Warren Buffett has, over the 60 years of his career, proven himself to be a principled and honest investor. He has spent his life’s work working tirelessly to improve confidence in our financial system. And he has often been the first to sound the alarm, often years in advance, when investors are being fooled by Wall Street, as he did in 2003 when he called derivatives “Weapons of Mass Financial Destruction” . What is this all about? Some say that because Mr. Buffett has always had a sterling reputation that he should be held to the highest of standards — perhaps even higher than those of other executives; and that when he does falter, he must be held accountable for his actions. I don’t disagree. Should the SEC look into this matter? Yes. Should Mr. Buffett be accountable to his shareholders like any other CEO? Absolutely. After having to watch virtually unrepentant financial industry executives lie in hearing after hearing during the investigation in the 2008 economic crisis, why are we wasting all of our energy to go after someone who has done everything to instill confidence in our financial system, and has been a paragon of the highest ethical standards? Because one of his executives committed ethical violations, on his own, that were voluntarily exposed? We can’t be in the business of throwing the baby out with the bath water. Let’s focus on the real enemy. It certainly isn’t Warren Buffett.

Read the full article →

A Capitalism’s ‘Woodstock,’ Buffett Will Face Down Scandal

April 29, 2011

OMAHA, Nebraska (By Ben Berkowitz) – It could be the toughest weekend Warren Buffett has ever had. Tens of thousands of Berkshire Hathaway shareholders are descending on Omaha for the conglomerate’s annual meeting, known as “The Woodstock for Capitalism.” But there appears to be only one topic of conversation in town — Berkshire’s extraordinary claims about the behavior of one of its top executives. While the Berkshire board’s scathing condemnation of former Buffett lieutenant David Sokol on Wednesday may have been crafted as an attempt to exonerate Buffett himself, it has left plenty of open questions. Buffett’s public wants answers to them this Saturday. “I think he’s dotted his I’s and crossed his T’s from a legal standpoint but not much more than that. That’s sad for Warren Buffett, because I think he believes the statements that he makes,” said Paul Argenti, professor at the Tuck School of Business at Dartmouth College. “He’s the best and I expect the best from him, and I think that’s why everyone is so disappointed,” said Argenti, who has had Buffett appear in his classes in the past. Berkshire’s board released an 18-page report by its audit committee this week examining the behavior of Sokol, the former MidAmerican Energy chairman who was widely held to be Warren Buffett’s presumed successor at the helm of Berkshire. The damning report suggests Sokol misled Berkshire about his personal investment in Lubrizol Corp. It was an extraordinary disclosure, and one sure to change the tone of the annual meeting Saturday — ordinarily a Buffett lovefest that he has described as capitalism’s version of Woodstock. “It’s clearly going to send a message,” YCMNET Advisors Chief Executive Michael Yoshikami, a Berkshire shareholder, said earlier this week of how the report would affect the hordes attending the annual meeting. SHIFT IN FOCUS From a legal standpoint, if the goal of the report was to shift the focus of the story back on to Sokol and ease the pressure on Buffett, most experts think it succeeded. While the report makes it clear that Buffett was essentially duped by one of his top lieutenants, it also emphasizes repeatedly that any deception was purely Sokol’s and likely intentional. “With one quick disclosure, Berkshire is essentially agreeing with the public and the press and pinning the blame entirely on Sokol,” said Jay Brown, a law professor at the University of Denver. Buffett will still face tough questions on Saturday about what happened — particularly his statement in late March that he did not feel Sokol had done anything unlawful, a conclusion the audit committee report appears to contradict. The question, however, is whether there actually is a contradiction. “It may well be that the real purpose of the statement was to correct Buffett’s statement, announce the internal ethical rules within (Berkshire), and close the story once and for all,” said Tamar Frankel, a professor of law at Boston University. (Reporting by Ben Berkowitz, additional reporting by Moira Herbst in New York; Editing by Bernard Orr) Copyright 2010 Thomson Reuters. Click for Restrictions .

Read the full article →

Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway Might Sue Sokol

April 27, 2011

NEW YORK – Berkshire Hathaway on Wednesday said David Sokol misled the company in the way he disclosed his financial interest in Lubrizol Corp before pushing Berkshire CEO Warren Buffett to buy it. Berkshire’s board said in a statement its audit committee was still considering the possibility of legal action against Sokol as a result of his behavior and that it would cooperate with any government investigation. When Buffett announced Sokol’s resignation in March, he said he believed Sokol had not done anything unlawful. Sokol was widely seen as Buffett’s heir apparent before the news about his nearly $10 million investment in Lubrizol. “His misleadingly incomplete disclosures to Berkshire Hathaway senior management concerning those purchases violated the duty of candor he owed to the company,” Berkshire said. (Reporting by Ben Berkowitz. Editing by Robert MacMillan) Copyright 2011 Thomson Reuters. Click for Restrictions .

Read the full article →

Top 10 States With The Worst Income Inequality

April 26, 2011

By Douglas A. McIntyre and Charles B. Stockdale, 24/7 Wall St.: There was never any chance that in America income would be distributed like it was supposedly done in the Soviet Union – to each according to his ability and his needs. If capitalism is the key to the rise of the US economy, then the concept that some people can be richer than others is near the heart of the system. Americans worship self-made billionaires such as Bill Gates and Warren Buffett because they believe that it’s possible for them to be that wealthy too. Unfortunately, there are far more poor people than wealthy ones. America is the world’s most visible case of that. A small number of people in the US control most of the income, wealth, and property. More than one in eight people live below the poverty level and that number has grown recently. No matter what the government has done to bridge the difference between the groups, it has been ineffective, and that situation is not likely to change given the current tax laws. The wealthy have a higher tax rate, but even what they keep after taxes is far in excess of what most other Americans have. 24/7 Wall St. looked at the wealth gap by state to find those where the gulf between the rich and poor is the greatest. The formula used to reach this conclusion is a mathematical one called the Gini coefficient. It is a complex calculation which has on the one end of its measurement a world in which everyone makes exactly the same amount of money and on the other a collection of people where the gulf between the haves and have nots is high. The Marxian ideal is a “zero,” and a state in which one group possesses all the wealth and another has none would be “one.” The state in which the inequality is greatest in America, New York, is 0.5. Global statistics show that in come countries, the figure is as high as 0.7. 24/7 Wall St. took the 50 states and measured them according to the percentage of people below the poverty line and the percentage of people who earn more than $200,000. For comparison purposes, we also examined the median household income of each state as of 2009. The $200,000+ level is the highest wealth division of income considered by the Census. Only 3.8% of all households have incomes of $200,000 or more a year, which by itself shows how much wealth is distributed at the higher end of the income scale. The history of US income inequality, as the Census tracks it, began in 1967. The Gini coefficient was 0.397 then. It was 0.468 in 2009. America’s income divide is becoming greater. There are a nearly endless list of reasons for the number of low-income people have increase. The Census gives the most concise explanation. “Researchers believe that changes in the labor market and, to a certain extent, household composition affected the long-run increase in income inequality. The wage distribution has become considerably more unequal with workers at the top experiencing real wage gains and those at the bottom real wage losses. These changes reflect relative shifts in demand for labor differentiated on the basis of education and skill. At the same time, long-run changes in society’s living arrangements have taken place also tending to exacerbate household income differences. For example, divorces, marital separations, births out-of-wedlock, and the increasing age at first marriage have led to a shift away from married-couple households to single-parent families and nonfamily households. Since nonmarried-couple households tend to have lower income and income that are less equally distributed than other types of households (partly because of the likelihood of fewer earners in them), changes in household composition have been associated with growing income inequality.” These are the 10 states with the greatest income inequality. Check out 24/7 Wall St. for more information.

Read the full article →

Buffett, Berkshire Hathaway Sued Over Sokol Scandal

April 19, 2011

WILMINGTON, Delaware – Warren Buffett, former top lieutenant David Sokol, and the rest of Berkshire Hathaway Inc’s board of directors were sued on Tuesday by a shareholder over a trading scandal that cost Sokol his job. Sokol had been a leading contender to succeed Buffett as Berkshire’s chief executive until he resigned last month after revealing he bought shares of Lubrizol Corp before pitching the company to Buffett as a possible acquisition. The lawsuit, filed in Delaware’s Chancery Court by Berkshire shareholder Mason Kirby, calls for disgorgement of Sokol’s unlawful investment gains, and seeks to recover damage done to the company’s reputation and goodwill. Sokol had chaired Berkshire’s MidAmerican Energy unit and oversaw its NetJets Inc operations. Buffett’s assistant, Carrie Kizer, who fields Berkshire press inquiries, was not immediately available to comment. The case is Kirby v. Sokol et al, Delaware Chancery Court, No. 6392. (Reporting by Tom Hals; additional reporting by Ben Berkowitz in New York, editing by Matthew Lewis) Copyright 2011 Thomson Reuters. Click for Restrictions .

Read the full article →

Janet Tavakoli: Buffettgate: Berkshire Hathaway’s Problem at the Top

April 2, 2011

Suppose I took a call from a banker-friend at Citigroup on December 13, 2010, and he informed me that he had just observed other Citi bankers meeting with David Sokol, an executive of Berkshire Hathaway and possible successor to Warren Buffett, the CEO. He discovered Sokol expressed interest in a company called Lubrizol and requested a meeting with the company’s President. Buffett himself made it public that Sokol investigated a Chinese battery and electric car maker, BYD, in which Berkshire made a substantial investment. The shares subsequently soared in value. I would have no way of knowing for certain that Sokol would bring the opportunity to Warren Buffett. I would have no way of knowing for sure whether Berkshire Hathaway would invest in Lubrizol. But if I bought shares in Lubrizol the next day, I would expect that the Citi banker would be investigated by the SEC for passing along insider information, and I would be investigated for trading based on insider information.* Yet David Sokol, who bought shares in Lubrizol the day after his meeting with Citi’s bankers, told CNBC he did nothing inappropriate. His actions were absolutely inappropriate–front-running is an offense for which a banker or investment banker would be fired. “When bankers from Citigroup Inc. met David Sokol late last year to talk about potential transactions, they thought they were dealing with him as a senior executive of Berkshire Hathaway Inc., according to people familiar with the matter.” “It…came as a shock to the Citigroup bankers when they learned Mr. Sokol bought roughly $240,000 of shares of Lubrizol corp. a day after their meeting, sold them, and then purchased $10 million shares about two months before Berkshire’s $9 billin deal unveiled March 14…[T]he shares are valued at nearly $13 million now.” [It's unclear if Sokol still owns them.] Excerpt from: ” Mixed Signals Marked Sokol Meeting: Bankers Thought Pitch was for Senior Berkshire Executive, Not High-Powered Individual Investor ,” by Gina Chon and Serena Ng, Wall Street Journal , April 2, 2011. Berkshire Hathaway has a bigger problem than Sokol’s actions. Its reputation has revolved around the lip-service paid by Warren Buffett to a high standard of corporate governance. His actions and attitude to this matter raise serious questions for the future of Berkshire Hathaway. The moral tone set at the top is now being publicly questioned as well as his seeming support of Sokol’s actions. “Neither Dave nor I feel his Lubrizol purchases were in any way unlawful. He has told me that they were not a factor in his decision to resign.” Source: Berkshire Hathaway via Business Wire: ” Warren E. Buffett, CEO of Berkshire Hathaway, Announces the Resignation of David L. Sokol ,” March 30, 2011. Why didn’t Buffett ask for Sokol’s resignation? Sokol’s behavior was unethical, and it may even go beyond that. There may be further inquiry to determine the legality of Sokol’s purchases. During an initial meeting with Sokol about Lubrizol, Buffett wrote that Sokol mentioned he owned shares in the company, but Buffett didn’t ask him for further information including details of the timing, price, and number of shares. Warren Buffett says he plays bridge around 12 hours per week. The first thing one does is engage in an auction in an attempt to determine the value and quantity of the cards held by one’s partner. Yet Buffett states he did not inquire further about a senior Berkshire Hathaway officer’s investment in an acquisition candidate. In isolation, investors might be willing to overlook this as misplaced loyalty on Warren Buffett’s part. But a series of issues have surfaced about Berkshire Hathaway’s practices. Most recently, the Securities and Exchange Commission wrestled with Berkshire Hathaway’s CFO to make the company take a fourth quarter write-down: “Despite [the Chief Financial Officer's] objection, the company recorded $938 million in impairment charges in the fourth quarter to reflect declines in shares of Swiss Reinsurance Co., U.S. Bankcorp and pharmaceutical firm Sanofi Aventis S.A.” ” Berkshire Wrote Down Stocks After SEC Query ,” by Erik Holm, Wall Street Journal , March 29, 2011. The SEC and the financial press may not have noticed that Berkshire Hathaway had the last word: “…such losses that are included in earnings are offset by a corresponding credit to other comprehensive income.” Berkshire Hathaway 10K for year-end 2010 (required SEC filing), Footnote p. 74. Berkshire Hathaway is a conglomerate, and the nature of accounting for conglomerates is opaque and messy. Warren Buffett’s reputation has been crucial to Berkshire Hathaway’s perceived value. Investors may now challenge their previous perceptions. * Even if Berkshire Hathaway decided not to invest, and I sold the shares I bought before the general public became aware of the lack of interest, I could avoid a potential loss if the shares went down in value on the news. Martha Stewart allegedly sold shares ahead of bad news after a tip from her stockbroker and avoided a loss of around $50,000. She went to prison for allegedly not coming clean when questioned by authorities. See also: VIDEO: ” Backdoor Dealings ,” First Business Morning News , April 1, 2011. ” Warren Buffett, Stop Using My Credit Card! ” – TSF – November 23, 2009 ” Warren Buffett and Charlie Munger: Winning the Class War ,” Huffington Post , September 21, 2010. Disclosure: I currently hold no position, long or short, in Berkshire Hathaway.

Read the full article →

Video: Kilpatrick Says Sokol Resignation a `Blip’ to Berkshire

April 1, 2011

April 1 (Bloomberg) — Andrew Kilpatrick, author of “Of Permanent Value: The Story of Warren Buffett,” talks about the resignation of David Sokol from Berkshire Hathaway Inc. and its impact on succession planning at the company. Sokol bought 96,060 shares of Lubrizol Corp. in early January before recommending that Berkshire acquire the company, Buffett said in a March 30 statement announcing Sokol’s resignation. Kilpatrick speaks with Erik Schatzker on Bloomberg Television’s “InsideTrack.” (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Explained: Sokol’s Role In Berkshire’s Lubrizol Deal

March 31, 2011

NEW YORK (Reuters) – Warren Buffett’s leading heir apparent at Berkshire Hathaway, David Sokol, has resigned after buying shares in Lubrizol Corp, a chemical company he then pushed Buffett to acquire. Below is a timeline of events running up to the $9 billion deal and Sokol’s resignation, based on Buffett’s statement on Wednesday and Lubrizol’s regulatory filing on March 25. Fall 2010: Sokol requests Citigroup investment bankers to come up with a list of possible targets for Berkshire Hathaway, including in the chemical industry. Citi gives him a list of 18 companies, including Lubrizol. Dec 13, 2010: Sokol discusses the list with Citi and says Lubrizol was the only company he found interesting. He asks a Citi representative to tell Lubrizol Chief Executive James Hambrick that Sokol was interested in meeting to discuss a possible deal. Dec 14: Sokol buys 2,300 Lubrizol shares. Dec 17: Citi relayed Sokol’s interest to Hambrick, who said he would inform the Lubrizol board of Berkshire’s interest. Dec 21: Sokol sells the Lubrizol shares. Jan 5-7, 2011: Sokol buys 96,060 Lubrizol shares after placing a 100,000-share order with a $104 per share limit price. Jan 6: Lubrizol’s board discusses possible deal with Berkshire and engages Jones Day and Evercore for advice. Jan 10: Lubrizol board convenes with Jones Day and Evercore to discuss a potential Berkshire deal. The board instructs CEO Hambrick to meet with Sokol. Jan 14: Sokol and Hambrick have a general talk over the phone and set up a meeting for January 25 Jan 14 or 15: Sokol suggests buying Lubrizol to Buffett, with a “passing remark” that he owned some stock in the company. Buffett is not interested. Jan 24: Buffett sends Sokol a short note expressing skepticism about making an offer for Lubrizol and preference to make another substantial acquisition. Jan 25: Lubrizol CEO Hambrick meets with Sokol and gives him information about the chemical company, including internal forecasts for 2014 and 2015; Sokol reports the meeting to Buffett, who then warmed to the acquisition. Jan 28: Evercore tell Lubrizol’s board that Buffett called them the day before and expressed interest in the deal. Feb 8: Hambrick meets with Buffett. March 12: Lubrizol’s board approves the sale to Berkshire. March 13: Berkshire’s board supports Buffett’s decision to buy Lubrizol. March 14: Berkshire announces plan to buy Lubrizol for $135 per share. March 19: Shortly before leaving for a trip to Asia, Buffett learns the details of Sokol’s purchase of Lubrizol shares. March 28: Sokol’s assistant delivers his letter of resignation to Buffett. Buffett says he had not asked for Sokol’s resignation and that it came as a surprise. Sokol’s letter says “it is my goal to utilize the time remaining in my career to invest my family`s resources in such a way as to create enduring equity value and hopefully an enterprise which will provide opportunity for my descendents and funding for my philanthropic interests.” March 30: Buffett announces Sokol’s resignation request. He says, “Neither Dave nor I feel his Lubrizol purchases were in any way unlawful. He has told me that they were not a factor in his decision to resign.” Sources: Berkshire Hathaway statement, Lubrizol filing with U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (Compiled by Alina Selyukh) Copyright 2011 Thomson Reuters. Click for Restrictions .

Read the full article →

Possible Buffett Successor Resigns Without Warning

March 30, 2011

Berkshire Hathaway’s David Sokol retired suddenly from the company on Wednesday. Prior to his resignation, Sokol was considered a leading candidate to replace the ledgendary Berkshire CEO Warren Buffett, after he retired. In a press release announcing Sokol’s retirement, Buffett also says that Sokol owned shares of Lubrizol — a lubricants company recently acquired by Berkshire Hathaway for roughly $9 billion — before the deal was finalized. Sokol’s decision did not have anything to do with the Lubrizol deal, Buffett said in the release. Buffett added that nothing about Sokol’s ownership of shares was “in any way unlawful.” Sokol was also CEO of Berkshire-owned NetJets and chairman of MidAmerican Energy Holdings Company. Berkshire-Hathaway has been readying for the 80-year-old Buffett’s retirement for some time. Last month, the company announced their search for the next CEO had been narrowed to four candidates , stopping short of listing those included. However, as Bloomberg notes, Buffett did praise a number of executives in his annual letter to the company this year, Sokol included. The others, in no particular order, were reinsurance executive Ajit Jain , energy executive Greg Abel, Geico CEO Tony Nicely, and Matt Rose, CEO of Burlington Northern Santa Fe railroads. Below is Berkshire Hathaway’s press release is authored by Warren Buffett : OMAHA, NE–This press release will be unusual. First, I will write it almost as if it were a letter. Second, it will contain two sets of facts, both about Dave Sokol, Chairman of several Berkshire subsidiaries. Late in the day on March 28, I received a letter of resignation from Dave, delivered by his assistant. His reasons were as follows: “As I have mentioned to you in the past, it is my goal to utilize the time remaining in my career to invest my family’s resources in such a way as to create enduring equity value and hopefully an enterprise which will provide opportunity for my descendents and funding for my philanthropic interests. I have no more detailed plan than this because my obligations from Berkshire Hathaway have been my first and only business priority.” I had not asked for his resignation, and it came as a surprise to me. Twice before, most recently two or so years ago, Dave had talked to me of resigning. In each case he had given me the same reasons that he laid out in his Monday letter. Both times, I and other Board members persuaded him to stay. Berkshire is far more valuable today because we were successful in those efforts. Dave’s contributions have been extraordinary. At MidAmerican, he and Greg Abel have delivered the best performance of any managers in the public utility field. At NetJets, Dave resurrected an operation that was destined for bankruptcy, absent Berkshire’s deep pockets. He has been of enormous help in the operation of Johns Manville, where he installed new management some years ago and oversaw major change. Finally, Dave brought the idea for purchasing Lubrizol to me on either January 14 or 15. Initially, I was unimpressed, but after his report of a January 25 talk with its CEO, James Hambrick, I quickly warmed to the idea. Though the offer to purchase was entirely my decision, supported by Berkshire’s Board on March 13, it would not have occurred without Dave’s early efforts. That brings us to our second set of facts. In our first talk about Lubrizol, Dave mentioned that he owned stock in the company. It was a passing remark and I did not ask him about the date of his purchase or the extent of his holdings. Shortly before I left for Asia on March 19, I learned that Dave first purchased 2,300 shares of Lubrizol on December 14, which he then sold on December 21. Subsequently, on January 5, 6 and 7, he bought 96,060 shares pursuant to a 100,000-share order he had placed with a $104 per share limit price. Dave’s purchases were made before he had discussed Lubrizol with me and with no knowledge of how I might react to his idea. In addition, of course, he did not know what Lubrizol’s reaction would be if I developed an interest. Furthermore, he knew he would have no voice in Berkshire’s decision once he suggested the idea; it would be up to me and Charlie Munger, subject to ratification by the Berkshire Board of which Dave is not a member. As late as January 24, I sent Dave a short note indicating my skepticism about making an offer for Lubrizol and my preference for another substantial acquisition for which MidAmerican had made a bid. Only after Dave reported on the January 25 dinner conversation with James Hambrick did I get interested in the acquisition of Lubrizol. Neither Dave nor I feel his Lubrizol purchases were in any way unlawful. He has told me that they were not a factor in his decision to resign. Dave’s letter was a total surprise to me, despite the two earlier resignation talks. I had spoken with him the previous day about various operating matters and received no hint of his intention to resign. This time, however, I did not attempt to talk him out of his decision and accepted his resignation. * * * Effective with Dave’s resignation, Greg Abel, presently President and CEO of MidAmerican Holding Company, will become its Chairman Todd Raba, President and CEO of Johns Manville, will become its Chairman; and Jordan Hansell, President of NetJets, will become its Chairman and CEO. I have held back nothing in this statement. Therefore, if questioned about this matter in the future, I will simply refer the questioner back to this release. Berkshire Hathaway and its subsidiaries engage in diverse business activities including property and casualty insurance and reinsurance, utilities and energy, finance, manufacturing, retailing and services. Common stock of the company is listed on the New York Stock Exchange, trading symbols BRK.A and BRK.B.

Read the full article →

Buffett, Gates Try To Persuade India’s Billionaires To Give More To Charity

March 24, 2011

NEW DELHI (By Alistair Scrutton and C.J. Kuncheria) – Two of the world’s richest men, Bill Gates and Warren Buffett, will meet the cream of India’s rich on Thursday to tap the wealth of a new generation of billionaires for charity in the rapidly developing Asian giant after a similar visit to China. The visit of two of the world’s most generous philanthropists has sparked a renewed debate about the willingness of India’s rich to part with their money to support the nation’s hundreds of millions below the poverty line. Gates, the founder of Microsoft and the world’s second richest man, has set up a $37 billion foundation focused on health in developing countries, usually targeting common diseases with high mortality rates, such as malaria, polio and AIDS. The 80-year-old Buffett, dubbed the “Oracle of Omaha” for his formidable investment decisions that have built up a $200 billion empire with Berkshire Hathaway Inc, has pledged to give 99 percent of his wealth to charitable causes. Much of that money will go to the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. Two decades of economic boom have propelled India’s industrialists and software moguls to the top table of the world’s rich, with two in the top 10 of the Forbes list of the richest people this year. Gates, arriving in the Indian capital after a visit to the poor northern state of Bihar, said while he had no “measurable outcome” in mind from the meeting, he hoped it would encourage India’s richest to emulate other philanthropists. “It’s fair experience that as you get people together to talk about philanthropy, they will hear why other people have committed and agreed to what they’re doing. It’ll encourage them to do more,” Gates told a news conference ahead of his meeting with the Indian billionaires. The Indian billionaires include software czar Azim Premji, who in 2010 donated $2 billion for education and social projects, and G.M. Rao, the chairman of the GMR group who last week pledged $340 million in charity. Separately, Buffett will also call on Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh on Friday. In a country where more than 450 million people live in poverty, around 50 billionaires account for 20 percent of India’s GDP. In 2010, there were six Indian industrialists on Forbes.com’s list of the world’s top 50 billionaires. With that have come some fantastic displays of wealth, including a $1 billion, 27-storey private home built by Mukesh Ambani of Reliance Industries in the country’s financial capital Mumbai. Bentleys now mix with bullock carts and rickshaws on the streets of Indian cities. But India’s billionaires have not been as willing to loosen their purse strings as their American counterparts, according to a study by the consultancy Bain & Co said in 2010. Charitable giving in India probably totaled about $7.5 billion in 2009, according to the study by Bain & Co, equivalent to about 0.6 percent of the country’s GDP. That percentage is higher than Brazil’s 0.3 percent and rival China’s 0.1 percent, but it falls way short of the 2.2 percent in the United States, and 1.3 percent in Britain, the report said. “Our crorepatis (billionaires) have a poor record of giving,” India’s NDTV said on its website. “They say they will turn up at the event to hear the wit and wisdom of the Oracle of Omaha — but may send him back with empty pockets.” (Writing by Matthias Williams; Editing by Sugita Katyal) Copyright 2010 Thomson Reuters. Click for Restrictions .

Read the full article →

Warren Buffett Says Possible Successor Could Make ‘A Lot More Money’

March 22, 2011

Berkshire-Hathaway hasn’t picked their next chief executive, but the current one certainly has good things to say about reinsurance executive Ajit Jain . Billionaire Warren Buffett, CEO of Berkshire-Hathaway and the world’s third-richest man , came out on Tuesday with a gushing review of the 59-year-old Jain, saying the company’s board of directors would support his selection as the company’s next Chief Executive Officer if he wanted the position, Bloomberg reports. Buffett says that although Jain, who has been with Berkshire since 1985, isn’t hoping to usurp Buffett’s position anytime soon, “[i]f he was, the board of directors would probably put him in there in a minute.” Buffett also said the Indian-born executive, who he describes as akin to family, had “probably made a lot more money for Berkshire than I have.” Berkshire-Hathaway has been readying for the 80-year-old Buffett’s retirement for some time. Last month, the company announced their search for the next CEO had been narrowed to four candidates , stopping short of listing those included. However, as Bloomberg notes, Buffett did praise a number of executives in his annual letter to the company this year, Jain included. The others, in no particular order, were energy executives David Sokol and Greg Abel, Geico CEO Tony Nicely, and Matt Rose, CEO of Burlington Northern Santa Fe railroads. After his departure, the Berkshire will split Buffett’s three roles — CEO, chairman, head of investments — into distinct positions.

Read the full article →

Goldman Sachs Buys Out Warren Buffett

March 18, 2011

OMAHA, Neb. — The Goldman Sachs Group Inc. said Friday it has received regulators’ permission to spend $5.65 billion to repurchase Berkshire Hathaway’s preferred shares in the banking giant. Goldman said the Federal Reserve has approved its plan to repay Warren Buffett’s company for the $5 billion investment it made at the height of the financial crisis in the fall of 2008. Goldman was eager to repay Berkshire because it had been paying 10 percent interest on the preferred shares, which translated into an annual expense of $500 million. “Berkshire Hathaway’s 2008 investment in Goldman Sachs was a major vote of confidence in our firm and we are very appreciative of it,” Goldman spokesman Stephen Cohen said. The repurchase will weigh down Goldman’s first-quarter earnings by $2.80 per share because it includes a one-time preferred dividend of about $1.65 billion. The Federal Reserve also approved Goldman’s overall capital spending plan for 2011, including the repurchase of common stock and a possible increase in the bank’s quarterly dividend. But Goldman did not announce any stock purchase or dividend plans on Friday. Goldman was one of a number of banks subjected to “stress tests” conducted by the Federal Reserve to see if their balance sheets were strong enough to weather another recession. On Friday, the Fed said it had completed those tests and expects that “some” banks will increase or resume dividend payments and buy back shares. The Fed did not reveal the names or number of banks that are expected to do so. Berkshire’s Goldman investment figures in a high profile insider trading trial because prosecutors say a former Goldman board member tipped off Galleon hedge fund founder Raj Rajaratnam about Berkshire’s investment before it was announced. The SEC said Rajaratnam directed his hedge fund, the Galleon Group, to buy 175,000 shares of Goldman stock within a minute of receiving the tip about Berkshire’s investment, enabling him to earn nearly $1 million in profit. Rajaratnam’s trial began earlier this week. He has denied wrongdoing. The former Goldman board member has also denied wrongdoing. Buffett did not immediately respond to a message Friday seeking comment, but he predicted in his annual letter to shareholders last month that Goldman would soon redeem the shares. Buffett has said that the $500 million dividend Goldman had been paying Berkshire broke down to nearly $16 a second, making every tick of the clock sound like music to his ears. But he said Goldman didn’t seem to like hearing its money tick away. Buffett told shareholders that Goldman’s decision to redeem shares – along with similar moves by Swiss Re and General Electric – will diminish Berkshire’s earning power because it will no long receive the special high dividends. Berkshire’s 50,000 preferred shares of common stock will be repurchased for $110,000 apiece on April 18 because Goldman was required to give 30 days notice. But Berkshire will continue to hold warrants to buy 43.5 million common Goldman shares at a price of $115 per share anytime before the fall of 2013. Earlier this week, Berkshire found a use for some of its cash when it announced a deal to pay $9 billion for specialty chemical company Lubrizol Corp. That deal, which includes $700 million in debt, is expected to close in the third quarter, if shareholders and regulators approve. Berkshire owns roughly 80 subsidiaries, including clothing, furniture, jewelry and corporate jet firms, but its insurance and utility businesses typically account for more than half of the company’s net income. It also has major investments in such companies as Coca-Cola Co. and Wells Fargo & Co. Berkshire has more than 260,000 employees worldwide but only 21 at its headquarters in Omaha.

Read the full article →

Bill Gates No Longer World’s Richest Man After Giving Away Billions

March 7, 2011

NEW YORK (By Michelle Nichols) – Bill Gates didn’t lose his title as the world’s richest man last year; he gave it away by plowing billions into his charitable foundation, experts say. Forbes will release its 2011 billionaires list on Wednesday and Gates, investor Warren Buffett and last year’s richest man, Mexican tycoon Carlos Slim, will almost certainly be in the top three. The trio have topped the list for the past five years. But it would be no contest if Microsoft co-founder Gates had not already given away more than a third of his wealth to the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, which focuses on global health and development and U.S. education. “It wouldn’t be a competition,” said David Lincoln, director of global valuations at wealth research firm Wealth-X. “(Gates) would have a comfortable margin if he had never discovered philanthropy.” Lincoln said Gates was currently worth about $49 billion, behind Slim, whose fortune he estimated at $60 billion. Buffett, also a philanthropist, is now worth some $47 billion. But had Gates not given away any money, he would be worth $88 billion, Lincoln said. Gates and his wife Melinda have so far given $28 billion to their foundation, the largest in the United States. Forbes’ 2010 billionaires list put Gates’ fortune at $53 billion, but he was knocked into second spot by Slim’s $53.5 billion, losing the crown for only the second time since 1995. Slim has said businessmen do more good by creating jobs and wealth through investment, “not by being Santa Claus,” and while he has still pledged several billion dollars to charity, his efforts have been a fraction of Gates’ philanthropy. Buffett, who Forbes ranked as the third richest man in the world last year with $47 billion, has also pledged almost all of his fortune to the Gates Foundation and has given $8 billion to the organization since 2006. But Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway Inc has fared better than Gates’ Microsoft. Microsoft shares now trade about where they were a decade ago, while Berkshire shares have roughly doubled. Since the end of 2009, Microsoft shares have fallen 16 percent, while Berkshire shares are up 29 percent. Slim’s major companies, which include Mexico’s former state telecoms monopoly Telmex, have also seen gains in their stock prices. “DRAMATIC” PHILANTHROPIC INFLUENCE Gates and Buffett have joined forces to encourage other billionaires to publicly pledge to give away at least 50 percent of their wealth during their lifetimes or upon their death as part of a campaign called The Giving Pledge. Glen Macdonald, president of the Wealth and Giving Forum, said Gates’ philanthropy had influenced the way other rich people in the United States approach their own philanthropy. “Encouraging people and leading by example — there’s no question that’s going to have influence on people’s giving patterns,” said Macdonald. “They are going to give sooner and they are going to give in greater amounts.” But Macdonald, whose group has advised 600 wealthy U.S. families on their philanthropy, disagrees with the public nature of The Giving Pledge, which requires billionaires to release a letter explaining their intentions. So far 59 billionaires have joined The Giving Pledge, publishing their letter at www.givingpledge.org. The campaign does not accept any money nor tell people how to give away their wealth, it just asks for a moral commitment. Paul Schervish, director of the Center on Wealth and Philanthropy at Boston College, said Gates’ influence had been “dramatic” and likened philanthropy to a gem, saying Gates was “changing the facets by learning and teaching others.” “He would be the first to admit that he is not the origin of the movement, of all the ideas in the movement, for which he is a leader,” Schervish said. “One of the things we’re dramatically finding is (many more) people beginning foundations and endowing them at higher levels while they are still alive,” he said. (Editing by Mark Egan and Cynthia Osterman) Copyright 2010 Thomson Reuters. Click for Restrictions .

Read the full article →

US- Economy still improving slowly: Warren Buffett

March 5, 2011

US- Economy still improving slowly: Warren Buffett

Read the full article →

Who Will Replace Warren Buffett?

February 28, 2011

OMAHA, Neb. — The pool of internal candidates to eventually replace Warren Buffett as Berkshire Hathaway’s chief executive has expanded to four, the company said in a regulatory filing Monday. The revered 80-year-old investor has said for several years that the Omaha-based company had three internal candidates to replace him as CEO someday, but has refused to name them. Berkshire plans to split Buffett’s job into three parts – chief executive officer, chairman and several investment managers. Buffett remains in good health and has no plans to retire, but he says Berkshire’s board regularly discusses succession and knows who it would pick as CEO if the need arises. Buffett’s assistant Carrie Kizer said he was travelling Monday and would not be immediately available to comment. The revelation about a fourth candidate reinforces speculation that Burlington Northern Santa Fe CEO Matt Rose became a contender after Berkshire acquired the railroad last year. The other Berkshire managers believed to be on the short list are David Sokol, chairman of NetJets and MidAmerican Energy; Ajit Jain, who runs Berkshire’s reinsurance division; Greg Abel, president and CEO of MidAmerican Energy; and Tony Nicely, chief executive of Geico. Berkshire shareholder Glenn Tongue, who is a managing partner at the T2Partners investment firm, said he’s satisfied with the company’s succession planning and the details Buffett has disclosed. He said naming the CEO candidates could actually be counter-productive because executives who were left off the list might be discouraged. “I think he’s walked the line on succession planning exactly appropriately,” Tongue said. Buffett says his primary responsibilities at Berkshire are deciding how best to invest the company’s cash and keeping key managers of Berkshire subsidiaries happy. Buffett consults with 87-year-old Vice Chairman Charlie Munger on all major decisions. But Buffett and Munger employ a remarkably hands-off approach to managing Berkshire’s roughly 80 subsidiaries. Berkshire’s insurance, furniture, utility, jewelry, clothing, carpet and other companies largely operate independently of Berkshire’s 21-person headquarters. On the investment side, Buffett has said Berkshire’s investment duties would likely be split among three or more different managers who would report to the next CEO. Those investment managers will be in charge of Berkshire’s stock portfolio and its other investments. Buffett has said his company’s board had a list of several internal and external investment managers who could manage Berkshire’s investments. Last fall, Buffett hired Todd Combs to manage $1 billion to $3 billion of Berkshire’s $158 billion investment portfolio, but no other candidates for the investment manager jobs have been named. Buffett has recommended that his son Howard take over as chairman to ensure Berkshire’s culture is preserved, but that decision will be made by Berkshire’s board. Howard Buffett already serves on the board.

Read the full article →

With $38 Billion, Warren Buffett Is Looking For Deals: ‘My Trigger Finger Is Itchy’

February 26, 2011

Warren Buffett is looking for acquisitions as an outlet to deploy his $38 billion cash pile, the legendary investor said in his annual letter to Berkshire Hathaway Inc shareholders on Saturday. Buffett gave an aggressive earnings forecast for Berkshire’s collection of businesses, said the company would engage in record capital spending and forecast a recovery in the housing market would start within a year. Foremost, though, was his acknowledgment of the need for Berkshire to expand its non-insurance businesses, a broad collection that most prominently includes the railroad Burlington Northern and the electric utility MidAmerican. “Our elephant gun has been reloaded, and my trigger finger is itchy,” Buffett said. The letter was released just before 8 a.m. EST Saturday, as it is in most years — and many large investors say they get up early that day to read it the moment it comes online. The so-called “Oracle of Omaha” said Berkshire will need “more major acquisitions” — with an italicized emphasis on major — to meet its goal. One long-time Berkshire investor described the letter as “punchy” and “confidently American,” among other things. “I would say as an investor, I think it’s a very upbeat letter, it’s one that celebrates his courage on behalf of investors of going into the marketplace when the world was most fearful,” said Tom Russo, a partner at Gardner Russo & Gardner in Lancaster, Pennsylvania, who is one of the 15 largest holders of Berkshire Class A shares. Copyright 2010 Thomson Reuters. Click for Restrictions .

Read the full article →

‘Too Big To Fail’ Will Never End, Buffett Says

February 11, 2011

No matter what the government does, taxpayer bailouts of the financial sector will sometimes be necessary, according to the nation’s second richest man. As markets crashed in the fall of 2008, government officials feared that if certain financial institutions failed, the entire financial system — or perhaps even the entire economy — would come down with them. In the months after the government extended a $700 billion bailout to the financial sector, lawmakers have striven to ensure that no institution poses such a systemic risk that it would be too big, or too interconnected, to be allowed to fail. But famed investor Warren Buffett, whose own firm profited handsomely from the bailout, said bailouts are an inevitable feature of finance, Bloomberg reports. Buffett, who is personally worth at least $45 billion , told the government panel charged with investigating the causes of the financial crisis that its work would not prevent the phenomenon of “too big to fail.” “You will always have institutions that are too big to fail, and sometimes they will fail,” Buffett told the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission in May, according to Bloomberg. His recorded comments were released Thursday by the FCIC, Bloomberg notes. (You can read the full set of FCIC documents here .) “We still have them now. We’ll have them after your commission report.” Buffett’s diagnosis joins a chorus of similar warnings. Yale economist Robert Shiller , speaking last fall at The Economist ‘s Buttonwood Conference in New York City, said the Dodd-Frank financial reform legislation would not stop financial firms from being of systemic importance. “What we’ve seen so far is not going to eliminate the problem of systemic risk, because it’s a very difficult problem. It involves the nature of the banking system, which is inherently vulnerable,” Shiller said. “It’s vulnerable to runs and collapses, just like steam engines are vulnerable.” Ending “too big to fail” has been a priority for government officials. Much talk was spent on a so-called “resolution authority,” which would theoretically allow the government to break up banks on the verge of failure. But even before the bill was passed, Federal Reserve chairman Ben Bernanke expressed doubts that such authority would work. As of now, the nation’s four biggest banks are able to get even bigger before they even reach the government-imposed limits, HuffPost’s Shahien Nasiripour reported. Buffett, for his part, made a successful bet that the government would bail out the financial sector. His firm injected $5 billion into Goldman Sachs during the worst of the crisis, as part of a highly lucrative deal . Buffett’s preferred stock earns a 10 percent dividend annually . Last fall, when Goldman was reportedly trying to exit the deal early, the bank was paying Buffett’s firm about $1.3 million every day. As the Wall Street Journal noted, that’s about $15 per second.

Read the full article →

Gates, Buffett Ask India’s Big Shots To Chip In On Polio Eradication

January 31, 2011

Over the next six months, Bill Gates and Warren Buffett will travel to to India to ask top business officials to ante up to end polio. Gates highlighted in his annual letter the $720 million gap in the Global Polio Eradication Initiative. The Gates Foundation will ask Indian billionaires to be part of the Giving Pledge and donate most of their fortunes to charity. As one of the countries with the highest rate of polio transmission, India’s government, alongside the Gates Foundation, is the biggest contributor to wiping out polio . In 2010, India cut cases by 95 percent , and the disease is close to being stamped out, which would make it the second disease in history to be wiped out, after small pox. Gates calls it “good progress” but says there’s still more work to be done. “If eradication fails because of a lack of generosity on the part of donor countries it would be tragic. We are so close, but we have to finish the last leg of the journey.”

Read the full article →

Robert Lenzner: Plutocracy;The Rich Elite And The Rest Of Us

January 23, 2011

The controversy over the disparity between the rich and the rest of us has hit the covers of two emblematic fountains of ideas; The Economist and The Atlantic Monthly. The mention of a risk to society of “an entrenched plutocracy,” brought that almost archaic word back to me. I had used it on the front-piece of my best-selling biography of J. Paul Getty, “The Great Getty” some quarter of a century ago. I quoted the caustic critic H.L Mencken, who wrote “”The plutocracy, in a democratic state, tends to take the place of the missing aristocracy, and even to be mistaken for it.. It is, of course, something quite different. It lacks all the essential character of a true aristocracy: a clean tradition, culture, public spirit, honesty, courage- above all, courage. It stands under no bond of obligation to the state; it has no public duty; it is transient and lacks a goal…Its main character is its incurable timorousness; it is forever grasping at straws held out by demagogues… its dreams are of banshees, hobgloblins, bugaboos.” Applied to Getty, who imagined he was the reincarnation of the Roman Emperor Hadrian, and who admired Hitler as a kind of 20th century Hadrian, Mencken was partially right on. Today, though, when I think of Warren Buffett and Bill Gates rounding up billionaires to give away half their fortunes, when I see Frank Giustra, along with Carlos Slim committing to improving the life of the poor in mining nations like Peru and Colombia, when I read about hedge-fund maven adopting schools, and Zuckerberg giving $100 million to Newark, I reckon we have come a very long way since Mencken wrote that cutting description of the moguls. He wasn’t describing Carnegie or Rockefeller or Rosenwald, either, who understood instinctively that theirv wealth was meant to be used in making society better for the rest of us. In the meantime, I’m waiting to see if and how the plutocrats of Russia will change their image as “Oligarchs”- not very democratic is it. Or what role the gazillionaires of China and India and the rest of the Asian subcontinent will interact with their rulers and the billions of those ruled. Let’s hope we’re going to get a new 21st century meaning of Plutocracy. And The New Elite will be more than hopping on their private jets to move from castle to castle to yacht, pushing up the prices of art and trying to emulate the Roman Emperors, the 18th century French nobility or the Russian Tsars. More Warren Buffett wannabees please.

Read the full article →

Warren Buffett To Leave Washington Post Board

January 20, 2011

WASHINGTON — Billionaire investor Warren Buffett is leaving the board of the Washington Post Co. Buffett, whose company Berkshire Hathaway Inc. owns 1.7 million Washington Post shares, first joined the Post’s board in 1974, and except for one eight-year break he has remained on the board since then. In a statement Thursday, Buffett says he will continue to offer any help to the company that management asks. But he will step down from his formal role in May. Buffett didn’t give a specific reason for leaving the board, and he didn’t immediately respond to a message.

Read the full article →

Warren Buffett: I ‘Should Be Paying A Lot More In Taxes’

November 21, 2010

WASHINGTON — Billionaire Warren Buffett rebutted claims that the Obama administration is unjustly hurting business orders with high taxes by saying that in fact, the wealthy have never had it so good. “I think that people at the high end, people like myself, should be paying a lot more in taxes . We have it better than we’ve ever had it,” he told ABC’s Christiane Amanpour in a clip played on “This Week” on Sunday. When Amanpour pointed to critics’ claims that the very wealthy need tax cuts to spur business and capitalism, Buffett replied, “The rich are always going to say that, you know, ‘Just give us more money, and we’ll go out and spend more, and then it will all trickle down to the rest of you.’ But that has not worked the last 10 years, and I hope the American public is catching on.” WATCH: On Tuesday, Buffett wrote a New York Times op-ed in the form of a letter to “Uncle Sam,” thanking him for saving the U.S. econom y: When the crisis struck, I felt you would understand the role you had to play. But you’ve never been known for speed, and in a meltdown minutes matter. I worried whether the barrage of shattering surprises would disorient you. You would have to improvise solutions on the run, stretch legal boundaries and avoid slowdowns, like Congressional hearings and studies. You would also need to get turf-conscious departments to work together in mounting your counterattack. The challenge was huge, and many people thought you were not up to it. Well, Uncle Sam, you delivered. People will second-guess your specific decisions; you can always count on that. But just as there is a fog of war, there is a fog of panic — and, overall, your actions were remarkably effective. Buffett isn’t the only billionaire who has argued for higher taxes. Both Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates and his father, Bill Gates, Sr., recently came out in support of a Washington state measure to ” create a 5 percent tax rate on annual income exceeding $200,000 for individuals and $400,000 for couples, and a 9 percent tax rate on income that tops $500,000 for individuals and $1 million for couples.” Buffett has spoken out in the past about taxes for the wealthy, telling the Senate Finance Committee in 2007 that the estate tax should not be repealed. “I think we need to… take a little more out of the hides of guys like me ,” Buffett testified.

Read the full article →

Video: Spier Says Buffett Treads `Fine Balance’ on Succession

October 26, 2010

Oct. 26 (Bloomberg) — Guy Spier, chief executive officer of Aquamarine Capital LLC, talks about succession planning at Berkshire Hathaway Inc. and hedge fund manager Todd Combs, who has named by Warren Buffett to run a “significant portion” of Berkshire’s investment portfolio. Todd Combs, who manages about $400 million in financial-services shares at Castle Point Capital in Greenwich, Connecticut, becomes an investment manager, Berkshire said. Spier speaks with Betty Liu on Bloomberg Television’s “In the Loop.” (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Video: Paur Says Buffett-Backed BYD Faces `Moment of Truth’: Video

September 28, 2010

Sept. 28 (Bloomberg) — Klaus Paur, North Asia regional director for automotive at TNS Research International, talks about the outlook for Chinese automaker BYD Co. Billionaire Warren Buffett yesterday affirmed his support for BYD, part-owned by his Berkshire Hathaway Inc., saying it will be a leader in electric cars. Paur speaks with Rishaad Salamat on Bloomberg Television’s “On the Move Asia.” (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Video: Buffett Calls BYD `Dynamic’ Carmaker, Affirms Investment: Video

September 27, 2010

Sept. 27 (Bloomberg) — Billionaire Warren Buffett affirmed his support for BYD Co., saying the Chinese automaker, part-owned by his Berkshire Hathaway Inc. holding company, will be a leader in selling electric cars. Bloomberg’s Stephen Engel reports. (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Jay-Z & Warren Buffett Talk Shop On Giving Back

September 23, 2010

For the upcoming issue of Forbes magazine , Jay-Z and Warren Buffett sat down to lunch with Steve Forbes to talk money – and philanthropy. The two financial moguls discussed their personal successes over strawberry malts, and cited the obstacles that come with charitable giving. Buffett explained to Forbes , It’s tougher than business, Steve. You’re looking for easy things to do in business. If people have liked drinking Coca-Cola for 100 years, they’ll probably like it for another 100. It doesn’t require great brainpower to figure that out. In philanthropy you’re tackling the tougher problems of society, things where people have applied money and intelligence before and haven’t really solved the problem. The interview, published Thursday on Forbes.com , will hit newsstands on Oct. 11, 2010.

Read the full article →

Jay-Z & Warren Buffett Talk Shop On Giving Back

September 23, 2010

For the upcoming issue of Forbes magazine , Jay-Z and Warren Buffett sat down to lunch with Steve Forbes to talk money – and philanthropy. The two financial moguls discussed their personal successes over strawberry malts, and cited the obstacles that come with charitable giving. Buffett explained to Forbes , It’s tougher than business, Steve. You’re looking for easy things to do in business. If people have liked drinking Coca-Cola for 100 years, they’ll probably like it for another 100. It doesn’t require great brainpower to figure that out. In philanthropy you’re tackling the tougher problems of society, things where people have applied money and intelligence before and haven’t really solved the problem. The interview, published Thursday on Forbes.com , will hit newsstands on Oct. 11, 2010.

Read the full article →

400 Richest Americans Got Richer This Year, As Most Americans’ Net Worth Tanked: Forbes

September 23, 2010

The richest Americans got even richer this year, according to the new Forbes 400 list, even as the country’s total net worth tanked during the second quarter. The top 400, all of whom are worth at least $1 billion, saw their combined wealth increase 8 percent this year, to the dizzying total of $1.37 trillion, according to analysis from CNN . Meanwhile, according to data released last week by the Federal Reserve, the net worth of American households and non-profits in the second quarter of this year plunged 2.8 percent, or $1.52 trillion, from the previous quarter, to settle at $53.5 trillion. This means the 400 richest people in America account for about 2.6 percent of the nation’s private wealth. Topping the list — again — is Bill Gates , at $54 billion, up from $50 billion last year. In second is Warren Buffett, the so-called Oracle of Omaha who Thursday said it’s “common sense” that “we’re still in a recession,” with $45 billion. Members of the Walton family (of Walmart fame) snagged spots four, seven, eight and nine. New York mayor Michael Bloomberg, with $18 billion, came in 10th. Investor George Soros, who last week called the nation’s economy “blah,” came in 14th with $14.2 billion. Charles and David Koch, the manufacturing and energy titans and Tea Party movement bankrollers, profiled by Jane Mayer in The New Yorker last month, tied for fifth place with $21.5 billion apiece. Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg, in 35th place with $6.9 billion, is no longer the youngest billionaire on the list — his colleagues at Facebook, Dustin Moskovitz (in 290th with $1.4 billion) and Eduardo Saverin (in 356th with $1.15 billion) have joined him. Moskovitz is eight days younger than Zuckerberg. Both are 26. In a video interview with Forbes , Buffett said he is “sort of wired for capital allocation” and that he loves his profession so much that “I would be doing what I do now, and I would have done it in the past, if the payoff had been in seashells or shark’s teeth or anything else.” Buffett was having a conversation with rapper Jay-Z, who didn’t make the billionaires list, and who offered insights into his own rise to glory: “We were into a lot of street things,” he said. “It just so happened I had a talent to make music.”

Read the full article →

Buffett, Ballmer Predict Bright Economic Future

September 13, 2010

BUTTE, Mont. — Two of the biggest names in business say they see a bright future for the economy. Famed investor Warren Buffett says there will be no double-dip recession as some fear. He says banks are lending money again, businesses are hiring employees and he expects the country to come back stronger than ever. The chairman of Berkshire Hathaway Inc. was speaking Monday via video to the Montana Economic Development summit in Butte. Microsoft Corp. CEO Steve Ballmer says there soon will be more technological advancement and invention than seen during the Internet era. He says that will help drive business growth. The conference was organized by U.S. Sen. Max Baucus. The Montana Democrat says it leaves “bickering and name-calling” back in Washington, D.C., so leaders can find good ideas.

Read the full article →

Frank Rich Takes On The Billionaire ‘Sugar Daddies’ Backing The Tea Party

August 29, 2010

ANOTHER weekend, another grass-roots demonstration starring Real Americans who are mad as hell and want to take back their country from you-know-who. Last Sunday the site was Lower Manhattan, where they jeered the “ground zero mosque.” This weekend, the scene shifted to Washington, where the avatars of oppressed white Tea Party America, Glenn Beck and Sarah Palin, were slated to “reclaim the civil rights movement” (Beck’s words) on the same spot where the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. had his dream exactly 47 years earlier. Vive la révolution! There’s just one element missing from these snapshots of America’s ostensibly spontaneous and leaderless populist uprising: the sugar daddies who are bankrolling it, and have been doing so since well before the “death panel” warm-up acts of last summer. Three heavy hitters rule. You’ve heard of one of them, Rupert Murdoch. The other two, the brothers David and Charles Koch, are even richer, with a combined wealth exceeded only by that of Bill Gates and Warren Buffett among Americans. But even those carrying the Kochs’ banner may not know who these brothers are.

Read the full article →

Raymond J. Learsy: "Its Not About the Money" — If Only the Texas Wyly Brothers Ran the SEC

August 25, 2010

There are still some straight shooters in our midst, and you can count the Wyly Brothers in that category. The SEC, fresh from their cream-puff settlement with Goldman Sachs, turned around late last month and laid a 78-page complaint on the Wyly Brothers alleging all manner of misconduct . The SEC claimed that the Wylys’ 58 trust and offshore corporations — based in such cozy tax havens as the Isle of Man and the Cayman Islands — were using hundreds of millions of untaxed dollars to pay for business ventures. Not surprisingly, the SEC’s action was filed just days after the SEC’s settlement with Goldman Sachs, the timing of which had raised not a few eyebrows. (See ” The Goldman Sachs Settlement, the Wall Street Journal, Warren Buffett, and the White House ” 07.17.10) And that is the rub. The timing of the Goldman Sachs settlement was too close to the passage of the Financial Regulations Bill, giving many the impression that one was tied to the other. And then there was the size of the settlement. $500 million — for a company like Goldman that had allegedly gamed the system for billions — was almost an insult to the marketplace and to many who found themselves on the opposite side of Goldman deals. The sum was less than 3% of Goldman’s 2009 bonus pool alone ($20 billion — that’s $20,000,000,000, in case you are counting). While the SEC cratered to Goldman, braying their $500 million settlement, thereby surrendering the one opportunity at closing a deep wound to Americans’ sense of fair-play. It would have been far more important to America, and to Main Street especially, had the SEC’s action against Goldman been settled by a jury. One way or another it would have brought closure to an issue that now still remains an open wound. Take the Wylys by comparison. Did the SEC, by bringing an action against the Wylys, seek to force a settlement on the Wylys? According to the Wyly brothers, they did nothing wrong. Their position as set forth in a front page New York Times article : “We made all the shareholders money, we made all the employees money, we did a good job for the customers, we did a good job for the vendors. We did everything you’re supposed to do with a company”. Continuing, “I could write them a check, but that’s not the point. It’s not about the money.” Had the SEC taken a page from the Wyly book, much of the pent-up venom surrounding all that has happened within the financial community could at least have been diffused in the knowledge that a jury of American citizens (and not our Wall Street-beholden government) would sit in judgment of Goldman Sachs — irrespective of the outcome. Litigate against Sam and Charles Wyly? Whoa! How about having them ride herd on the SEC?

Read the full article →

Video: Martin Agency’s Bassett Discusses Geico Ad Strategy: Video

August 16, 2010

Aug. 16 (Bloomberg) — Steve Bassett, a creative director at the Martin Agency, discusses the advertising strategy for Geico Corp., the auto insurer owned by billionaire investor Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway Inc. Bloomberg’s Jon Erlichman reports. (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Video: Franklin `Amazed’ by Response to Buffett’s Giving Pledge: Video

August 6, 2010

Aug. 6 (Bloomberg) — Jason Franklin, professor of public administration at New York University and executive director of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation’s Bolder Giving, talks about Warren Buffett’s push for billionaires to pledge at least half their fortunes to charity, the logistics behind the Giving Pledge and its impact on charitable giving. Franklin speaks with Margaret Brennan on Bloomberg Television’s “InBusiness.” (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Forty Billionaires Follow Buffett’s Pledge To Donate Bulk Of Their Wealth To Charity

August 4, 2010

Famed investor Warren Buffett today announced the names of 40 of America’s wealthiest families and individuals who have signed on to the Giving Pledge, a charitable project that targets billionaires to pledge to donate the bulk of their wealth. From New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg to Oracle (ORCL) CEO Larry Ellison, each of the individuals and families announced today have made a pledge to give the majority of their wealth to the philanthropic causes and charitable organizations of their choice, either during their lifetime or after their death.

Read the full article →

Li Lu, Warren Buffett’s Successor? Former Tiananmen Square Protester Could Take Over At Berkshire

July 30, 2010

Warren Buffett is in the hunt for a successor. How do you secure yourself a spot atop his list of choices to take over as CEO of Berkshire Hathaway? Make him a cool $1.2 billion within three years. That’s what Li Lu, who participated in the historic Tiananmen Square protest as a student, did. Now, the appointment of Mr. Li, a 44-year old Chinese-American hedge-fund manager, as Berkshire’s soon-to-be chief is a “foregone conclusion,” Charlie Munger, Berkshire’s 86-year-old vice chairman and Buffett’s longtime business partner, told the Wall Street Journal . Years ago, Li told Munger to buy BYD, a Chinese battery and auto maker. Munger took the advice, and Berkshire’s BYD bet has yielded profits of about $1.2 billion. According to the WSJ , Li’s hedge funds have banked returns of 26.4 percent in the last 12 years (compared to 2.25% for the Standard & Poor’s 500 stock index over the same period). Should he take on a role at Berkshire, Li’s penchant for foreign investments will likely result in the investment company making more deals outside the U.S., reports BusinessWeek . Li’s personal story is even more remarkable than his investment record. He was born in China in 1966 at the outset of the nation’s 10-year Cultural Revolution. Both his parents were sent to labor camps when he was child. As an orphaned student, he fled to France, and then the U.S. where he managed to simultaneously pick up an economics degree, a law degree and an MBA from Columbia University. Upon graduation, he embarked on a career in finance. What do you think? Is Li a good pick to replace Buffett?

Read the full article →

Raymond J. Learsy: The Goldman Sachs Settlement, the Wall Street Journal, Warren Buffett, and the White House

July 17, 2010

The timing of the Goldman Sachs settlement has raised eyebrows coming almost simultaneously to the passage of the Financial Regulations Bill and despite the fervent denials by Robert Khuzami, the SEC’s enforcement chief. The suspicion remains that the settlement was, if not politically motivated, at the very least politically timed. The answer? I don’t know. Today the Wall Street Journal reported that the “SEC Split Over Goldman Deal” voting 3-2 according to party lines to settle the lawsuit. At issue was whether the decision to abandon the strongest fraud charge was justified. The size of the fine? Well that, as everyone now knows is $550 million, trumpeted as the largest fine ever levied by the SEC. This on a transaction (the now notorious Abacus 2007-AC1 CDO) that cost two hapless European banks some $1 billion and for which they will receive a total of $250 million out of Goldman’s $550 settlement with the SEC. This on a transaction on which the Royal Bank of Scotland (now 83% owned by the British Government) lost $841 million, along with part of the settlement funds going to Germany’s IKB Bank that according to Reuter’s quoted Merck Finck analyst Konrad Becker provides “little consolation, if any, given that overall losses were much higher for IKB.” The language of the settlement will probably make it more difficult for the two European banks impacted in this instance to achieve full restitution from Goldman in that the settlement’s language averts allegations or usage in the legal sense of the term “misconduct.” It will likewise weigh on additional litigation in process that focus on other allegedly dubious financial instruments as in the Australian “Timberwolf” proceeding. Also noteworthy, according to the Wall Street Journal article, investors had been anticipating a fine of $1 billion or more. The fine actually levied at $550 represents but 2.4% of the $23 billion Goldman set aside for its 2009 bonus pool. Additionally, on Thursday as rumors of the settlement hit the market and was then announced, the stock climbed by some $13 a share, or some $7 billion in value. Clearly the settlement is a major plus for Goldman. The rush to settlement was instigated, according to the Wall Street Journal article, because the SEC had gotten wind of the fact that the WSJ was preparing an article on the “catch all settlement talks.” Really? Perhaps. But perhaps another tidbit might well be considered. Earlier this week President Obama met with Warren Buffett at the White House. Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway Inc. had invested $5 billion in Goldman Sachs. According to the New York Times report on July 14th “the meeting covered everything under the economic sky”. Were the gathering storm clouds of the Goldman litigation part of the vista in view as well?

Read the full article →

Video: Lountzis Recommends Buffett’s Berkshire, Progressive: Video

July 12, 2010

July 12 (Bloomberg) — Paul Lountzis, founder of Lountzis Asset Management LLC, discusses his investment strategy for insurers. Lountzis also discusses prospects for Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway Inc. and Progressive Corp. Lountzis speaks with Pimm Fox on Bloomberg Television’s “Taking Stock.” (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Warren Buffett On The Economy, The Deficit, LeBron James And BP (VIDEO)

July 8, 2010

When he looks at the economy, Warren Buffett sees “recovery.” In an exclusive interview today with Huffington Post and Yahoo! News, Buffett told Willow Bay that he disagreed with the recent statement by New York Times columnist and Nobel Prize winning economist Paul Krugman that we are “in the early stages of a third depression.” In the interview, Buffett says “we’re on the right course” and encourages President Obama to speak with “enormous confidence” about the country’s economic future. He says the stimulus is working and the economy will improve in the next 2-3 years. “We’re hiring,” he adds referring to many of his Berkshire Hathaway companies, another sign that the recovery is on track. Check out Buffett’s views on the economy — and his comments on the deficit, his personal finance tips and his take on Lebron James’s free agency decision.

Read the full article →

Dan Dorfman: Why 2011 Will Be A Bummer

June 28, 2010

Forget about that champagne toast on New Year’s eve. A bottle of Budweiser might be far more appropriate. Why beer instead of Don Perignon? Because it won’t be a happy 2011 as the economic mess promises to get messier. Likewise, we’ll all feel more financial aches and pains from Uncle Sam’s heftier tax grab, which will assuredly depress economic growth. This dreary year-ahead outlook comes from Madeline Schnapp, a sharp, perceptive economist who boasts a number of excellent calls on the economic front, especially as it relates to the critical job and housing markets. As such, she’s no stranger in my writings. Her view, it should be noted, is a contrary view. The general expectation is that the recovery will continue to hum in 2011, following a pickup in 2010, as the economy shifts from slippers to sneakers. Schnapp, the economics chief at West Coast liquidity tracker TrimTabs Research, which is partially owned by Goldman Sachs, is convinced the timing is wrong to think about a jitterbug economy next year. A slow fox trot, she believes, is much more in line, based on her work which shows we’re in for a disappointing 2011 economy and a limping stock market to boot. Schnapp figures you don’t really need the IQ of an Albert Einstein to recognize that the 2011 economy will be riddled with a number of significant land mines, which strongly suggests the general expectation of 3% to 3.5% GDP growth next year is overblown. Our economic worrier, by the way, is not looking for a double-dip recession next year, but rather anemic growth (on the order of 2%-2.5%), which reminds her of her favorite quote pertaining to exaggerated economic expectations. It comes from none other than Warren Buffett, who said: “You can’t produce a baby in one month by getting nine women pregnant. It just doesn’t work that way.” It means, Schnapp says, no matter how hard you try or what rabbit you try to pull out of your hat, the recovery process is just going to take a long time. Credit crises that lead to banking crises, she observes, take a lot longer to recover than say a business cycle characterized by bloated inventory. Speaking of economic land mines, Schnapp takes particular note of a bigger tax bite. Noting that the Bush tax cuts expire at the end of this year, she points out that if they all expire en masse, that would translate into tax increases approximating half a trillion dollars. Since that would be political suicide, she says, tax hikes will probably come in at $200-$250 billion, mostly on the shoulders of those individuals earning $200,000 a year. That, she believes, will shave 1%-2% off GDP growth next year. Among the most prominent tax boosts slated to go into effect on January 1, 2011, the top capital gains tax will rise to 20% from 15%, the top dividend tax rate will go up to 39.6% from 15%, the top personal income tax rate will climb to 39.6% from 35%, and the lowest person income tax rate will increase to 15% from 10%. As a result, Schnapp points out, many investors will probably be selling assets in the fourth quarter to avoid paying higher taxes next year. Aside from a larger tax bite, Schnapp takes note of several other developments that will stifle economic growth next year. In brief: –Loss of stimulus measures, such as income tax refunds, cash for clunkers and the homeowner’s tax credit. –Ongoing high unemployment, likely in the 9.5%-10% range, with additional job losses of 900,000 to one million. Adding to labor woes will be more than a million new entrants into the labor force. –A darker housing picture, what with another 7-8 million new mortgage delinquencies projected over the next couple of years on top of the current population of 7.2 million delinquencies. It means, says Schnapp, a bigger inventory overhang and a further decline in housing prices. –De-leveraging cycle here and in European countries–which is a deflationary event and will take many more years to unwind. This will result in less private and government sector growth, huge deficits, higher unemployment, reduced consumer spending and it all adds up to a dismal economic outlook. What about all those expectations of a fast recovery? Schnapp figures they’re strictly a pipe dream. “You’ll have to wait a long time before we see robust GDP growth again of 3% to 3.5%, and that won’t happen,” she believes, “until 2013 or 2014 when the housing market finally gets back on solid footing.” As far as investors go, Schnapp’s advice is “don’t get sucked into a bullish stock market scenario because it’s not real.” What do you think? E-mail me at Dandordan@aol.com.

Read the full article →

Broad Commits 75% of Wealth to Charity, Takes Buffett Up on Giving Pledge

June 16, 2010

By Katya Kazakina June 16 (Bloomberg) — Eli Broad and his wife, Edythe, have pledged 75 percent of their wealth to charity, the Los Angeles billionaire and philanthropist said in a statement today. The Broads are part of a drive called “The Giving Pledge,” started by Warren Buffett and Bill and Melinda Gates to encourage rich Americans to give at least 50 percent of their wealth to charitable causes. “Philanthropy is much harder than running two Fortune 500 companies,” said Broad, 77, former chairman of SunAmerica Inc. and KB Home, in an e-mailed statement today. “We will pledge in writing to give away 75 percent of our wealth during and/or after our lifetime.” The Broad Foundations have invested more than $2 billion in education, scientific and medical research and the arts. Their largest commitment has been $600 million to establish the Broad Institute of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard University, according to the statement. Buffett, the world’s third-richest person and chairman of Berkshire Hathaway Inc., has pledged more than 99 percent of his wealth to philanthropy. The greatest part of his fortune, estimated in March at $47 billion by Forbes magazine, is being given in annual installments to the foundation established by Microsoft Corp. co-founder Bill Gates and his wife, Melinda Gates. To contact the reporter on this story: Katya Kazakina in New York at kkazakina@bloomberg.net .

Read the full article →

Warren Buffett’s Charity Lunch Tops $1.9 Million in Last Hour of Bidding

June 11, 2010

By Dakin Campbell and Andrew Frye June 11 (Bloomberg) — Bidding for lunch with billionaire investor Warren Buffett topped $1.9 million in the last hour of the auction. The top bid, of $1,900,100 beat an offer of $1.9 million recorded at about 9:33 p.m. in New York, according to the EBay Inc. website. The top bid was launched using EBay’s automatic bidding function, according to spokeswoman Kathy Chui. It’s about 13 percent higher than the $1.68 million paid by last year’s winner, a group led by Courtenay Wolfe of Salida Capital, and the third year in a row that the auction winner will have to pay at least $1 million. The chance to have lunch with the celebrated billionaire investor drew eight bidders and 62 bids, according to EBay. The online auction started June 6 and ends at 10:30 p.m. New York time today. For Related News and Information: Berkshire’s equity holdings: BRK/A US PHDC5 Hedge funds and philanthropy: TNI HEDGE PHILANTHRO Buffett-related audio & video: BRK/A US TCNI AV More on Buffett: BIO WARREN BUFFETT

Read the full article →

Washington Post Names Former GM Chief Rick Wagoner to Publisher’s Board

June 10, 2010

By Greg Bensinger June 10 (Bloomberg) — Washington Post Co. elected Rick Wagoner , the former General Motors Co. chief who was pushed out after 32 years at the automaker, to its board, boosting the number of directors to 11. The publisher of the Washington Post is weighing bids for its Newsweek magazine, which it announced it wanted to sell last month, and has trimmed jobs and sections to help cope with plunging advertising sales. Wagoner, 57, was forced out as GM chief executive officer in March 2009 by the Obama administration in the run up to the Detroit automaker’s bankruptcy filing. He retired officially Aug. 1 after running the company for more than eight years. A former Duke University freshman basketball player, who received an MBA from Harvard University, Wagoner joined GM in the treasurer’s office. He also ran the company’s operations in Brazil and served as chief financial officer over the course of his career. “We’re fortunate to have someone who has run one of the largest companies — and largest advertisers — in the world, has extensive international experience and financial expertise join our board,” Washington Post Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Donald Graham said in an e-mailed statement. Washington Post’s other directors include investor Warren Buffett , IAC/InterActiveCorp. CEO Barry Diller , former Xerox Corp. CEO Anne Mulcahy and Melinda Gates , co-chairman of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and wife of Microsoft Corp. founder Bill Gates . Washington Post is considering at least four bids for Newsweek magazine, the money-losing publication it has owned since 1961. Advertising sales plunged 39 percent at the magazine last year to $70.3 million, according to documents sent to prospective buyers. Washington Post gained $10.18, or 2.3 percent, to $449.64 at 4:05 p.m. in New York Stock Exchange composite trading . The shares have risen 2.3 percent this year. To contact the reporters on this story: Greg Bensinger in New York at gbensinger1@bloomberg.net

Read the full article →

Buffett Charity Lunch Bidding Passes $400,000, Ahead of Last Year’s Pace

June 8, 2010

By Andrew Frye June 8 (Bloomberg) — Warren Buffett ’s lunch auction, an annual fundraiser to benefit a San Francisco charity, drew a high bid of $400,100 in the third day of the weeklong event, putting it ahead of last year’s pace. The auction on EBay Inc. generated 35 bids by 6:30 p.m. in New York, according to the website. Last year, bidding was still at $356,789 with less than 12 hours remaining, then surged to close at $1.68 million. The auction kicked off on June 6 this year and ends June 11 at 10:30 p.m. New York time. Buffett, the 79-year-old investor who is chairman and chief executive officer of Berkshire Hathaway Inc. , has raised almost $6 million over the past decade for San Francisco-based Glide Foundation, which serves meals to the needy. That includes a record $2.1 million in 2008. Bidding tends to pick up late on the final day of the auction. “The last 15 minutes is where all the action takes place,” Buffett said in an interview on Fox Business Network last year. The auction winner gets lunch for eight with Buffett, who’s revered by other investors for his five-decade career. Buffett’s stock picks and takeovers turned Omaha, Nebraska-based Berkshire from a failing textile mill to a $174 billion seller of bricks, power and hurricane insurance. Berkshire’s profit rose 61 percent to $8.06 billion last year. Glide Lunch With Warren Buffett Results: Year Winner Winning Bid 2000 Anonymous $25,000 2001 Anonymous $18,000 2002 Anonymous $25,000 2003 David Einhorn , Greenlight Capital $250,100 2004 Jason Choo, Singapore $202,100 2005 Anonymous $351,100 2006 Yongping Duan, California $620,100 2007 Mohnish Pabrai , Guy Spier , Harina Kapoor $650,100 2008 Zhao Danyang , China $2,110,100 2009 Salida Capital, Canada $1,680,300 Source: Glide To contact the reporter on this story: Andrew Frye in New York at afrye@bloomberg.net .

Read the full article →

Goldman Sachs Documents Subpoenaed by U.S. Financial-Crisis Investigators

June 7, 2010

By Jesse Westbrook June 7 (Bloomberg) — The U.S. panel investigating the causes of the financial crisis issued a subpoena to Goldman Sachs Group Inc. after the Wall Street firm failed to hand over documents in a “timely manner.” The Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission “has made it clear that it is committed to using its subpoena power” if firms under review don’t comply with information requests, the panel said in a statement today. Moody’s Corp. and Berkshire Hathaway Inc. Chief Executive Officer Warren Buffett were previously subpoenaed by the commission. The request for information shows the FCIC is turning attention to the most profitable firm in Wall Street history after investigating credit-rating companies and banks such as Citigroup Inc. and Bear Stearns Cos. Goldman Sachs has already drawn scrutiny from regulators and lawmakers for packaging mortgages into securities that triggered losses for investors when the housing market collapsed in 2007. “We have been and continue to be committed to providing the FCIC with the information they have requested,” Goldman Sachs said in an e-mailed statement. Goldman Sachs fell $1.31, or 1 percent, to $140.94 at 11:24 a.m. in New York Stock Exchange composite trading. The Securities and Exchange Commission sued New York-based Goldman Sachs April 16, accusing the firm of selling a collateralized debt obligation tied to mortgages without disclosing to investors that hedge fund Paulson & Co. helped pick the underlying securities. Paulson was betting the CDO would fail, the SEC said. Goldman Sachs has said the suit is “unfounded in law and fact.” Federal prosecutors in New York are also investigating transactions by Goldman Sachs to determine whether to bring charges, people familiar with the matter said April 29. The firm hasn’t been accused of criminal misconduct. To contact the reporter on this story: Jesse Westbrook in Washington at jwestbrook1@bloomberg.net .

Read the full article →

Warren Buffett’s Rating Agency Testimony Was A PR DISASTER: Felix Salmon

June 3, 2010

From a PR point of view — and Warren Buffett cares deeply about his public image — yesterday was arguably the single worst day of Buffett’s life. He was dragged against his will (with a subpoena, no less) in front of the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission, which grilled him on whether, as Moody’s largest shareholder, he took any responsibility at all for the disaster that happened there. His answer “no” was met with unanimous derision, both in the mainstream media and in the blogosphere: see The Pragmatic Capitalist, or Bond Girl (“It’s funny how heroes end up cutting themselves down to size even when no one else can”)

Read the full article →

Nancy F. Koehn: A New Damascus

May 24, 2010

Might the future of capitalism lie in its roots from the seventh millennium BC? Damascus is said to be the birthplace of capitalism–with scores of famous empires taking advantage of its proximity to the Barada River to build a system of canals and tunnels still in use today. Although these empires were often feuding for control, their ingenuity is a true testament to entrepreneurship, and a shining example of the positive effects of people coming together for a common cause. Flash forward to the 2008 World Economic Forum, when Bill Gates called for a new global economic system, one he called “creative capitalism.” In Gates’ vision, creative capitalism is an “approach where governments, businesses, and nonprofits work together to stretch the reach of market forces so that more people can make a profit, or gain recognition, doing work that eases the world’s inequities.” Gates has earned our ear (and for many of us, our respect) largely because he succeeded so convincingly playing the game of market or shareholder capitalism. Given Gates’ achievement, it is interesting that he laid down a gauntlet in which global capitalism directs itself toward social contribution as well as financial gain. Viewed through the lens of history, there are several powerful forces working on the system of global capitalism in our moment, propelling it along a broad path toward a New Damascus in which solving public problems–from the increasing volatility of the world financial system to the ticking time bomb of the planet’s environment–is as vital as maximizing return on equity. Indeed, along this new, broader road than market capitalism has previously traveled, the world’s biggest challenges represent the biggest business opportunities–and not only for large corporations but also for all those entrepreneurs beavering away in garages around the world. In the not so distant future, dealing with crises like Greece’s fiscal implosion or the oil spill in Louisiana will no longer be the sole or even primary purview of the nation state. Instead, business, large and small, will pour into the space previously crowded with government resources. Why? Because grappling with these kinds of problems will be part and parcel of how business delivers on (traditional) metrics like stock price and market valuation. At the same time, as the role and responsibilities of companies expand and older boundaries between business and society disintegrate, new metrics of performance, like employee engagement and customer loyalty, will emerge as equally important. Consider the forces of transformation today pushing global capitalism toward a New Damascus: The first is the issue of resources. Who has what to deal with the pressing challenges of our moment? If we think just about resources–people, innovation, traction, money, and execution–business is the most powerful force for change on the global stage right now. No other set of institutions–not religious organizations, not the nation-state, not individual NGOs–has the resources or the breadth and on-the-ground depth of knowledge of business to deal with what is front of us today. Yes, all these other players matter, in some cases a great deal. But not as much as business does–in the form of both large, global corporations and small-scale entrepreneurial enterprises. This is not philosophy or politics, but the ineluctable reality of our moment. A second force affecting the speed and direction of global capitalism comes from the demand side. There are millions–soon to be billions–of consumers, voters, and other actors, most obviously millenials or “Gen Yers”, who want something new and different from business, who conceive of business and the “flywheel” of global capitalism in distinctive ways than their counterparts have in past moments (and indeed than many boomers today). And these actors will exert great power in the next two decades. At the same time, the corporate form is changing very fast. New networks of companies and organizations are emerging; new ways of competing and collaborating are becoming more important. Old divisions are withering. The traditional widget-making company maximizing its own profit in a nationally defined space is evolving into something more complex and much more integrated into a broad, often global, web of relationships. A fourth catalyst is transparency. Leaders and organizations of all kinds are increasingly operating in glass houses. The explosion in transparency wrought by a global media, great leaps in connectivity, a generation of global citizens who demand novel, authentic commitments from organizations are creating new standards of conduct for even those actors least willing to change. Finally, though less obvious, there is a palpable thirst among people around the world for leadership that is not for sale, for individuals and organizations that are not solely defined by the transactional rhythms and white-hot speed of the marketplace. We can see this in the enduring popularity of entrepreneurial leaders such as Warren Buffett and Oprah Winfrey, individuals who have thrived in their respective industries partly because they consistently pursued something more then the next market-dictated score. All of these forces are gaining strength now, helping lay the pavement along which global capitalism will travel, as is evident in the success of large corporations that are meeting the needs of a broader set of stakeholders than shareholders. It is also evident in young enterprises now beginning to exert impact. Entrepreneurs and their creations have always been the sinews of capitalism. So we can look to an organization like RED, founded by Bono and Bobby Shriver, as an important example for where global capitalism is going. RED integrates the power of big business, new customer priorities, and the interconnected agents of social change, in the form of the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria. The animating mission of RED is to harness two of the most potent forces operating today, business and consumer spending, in service to eradicating deadly disease in Africa. Since its launch in 2006, RED has generated $150 million for the Global Fund. This money had helped reach more than five million people with testing, counseling, treatment and services while helping put more than 145,000 HIV-positive men, women and children on antiretroviral therapy. This is creative; this is capitalism; and this is the future, a New Damascus right here on our doorstep.

Read the full article →

Berkshire Hathaway Has Smaller Holding of Procter & Gamble, Filing Shows

May 7, 2010

By Andrew Frye May 7 (Bloomberg) — Warren Buffett ’s Berkshire Hathaway Inc. had a smaller shareholding of Procter & Gamble Co. at the end of March than three months earlier, a company filing showed. The market value of Berkshire’s investment in the world’s largest consumer-products company fell to $4.73 billion on March 31 from $5.04 billion at the end of December, Buffett’s firm said today in its quarterly report. Cincinnati-based P&G rose 4.4 percent on the New York Stock Exchange in the first quarter. The investment’s cost basis, a measure of how much was paid to accumulate a stake, declined to $4.46 billion from $4.96 billion, Omaha, Nebraska-based Berkshire said. The cost basis for American Express Co., Coca-Cola Co. and Wells Fargo & Co., the other three top holdings listed in Berkshire’s filing, were unchanged in the quarter. To contact the reporters on this story: Andrew Frye in New York at afrye@bloomberg.net .

Read the full article →

Goldman Investors Re-Elect Blankfein, Reject Splitting CEO-Chairman Role

May 7, 2010

By Christine Harper May 7 (Bloomberg) — Goldman Sachs Group Inc. shareholders re-elected Chief Executive Officer Lloyd Blankfein as chairman and voted against splitting the two roles after Blankfein said he has “no current plans” to step down. All directors up for re-election, including Blankfein, received more than 95 percent support in preliminary results, Goldman Sachs co-general counsel Greg Palm said at the annual shareholders’ meeting in New York. A proposal that would have required the company to split the chairman and CEO roles was supported by 19 percent of the votes, Palm said. The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission sued Goldman Sachs for fraud last month in connection with the sale of securities linked to mortgages, and Blankfein and other company executives were interrogated at a Senate subcommittee hearing probing the matter. Federal prosecutors are also investigating Goldman Sachs, which reported record profit last year. “I recognize that this is an important moment in the life of this institution,” Blankfein, 55, said at the meeting. “Our success has been and will continue to be dependent on the trust and confidence of our clients and our shareholders.” Blankfein, addressing the audience of more than 200, received applause after a shareholder said he is “doing a very good job” and shouldn’t have to step down. He said clients have stood by the firm throughout the public scrutiny. “ Our business has held up quite well,” Blankfein said. “You don’t hear a call you don’t get. But it feels like we are getting the kind of support we would hope and maybe in excess of that. At the same I don’t take it for granted, and I realize we are putting strains on our stakeholders.” ‘Clients’ Interests’ Blankfein said the firm created a committee to examine business practices and whether Goldman Sachs is adhering to its “core” value that “our clients’ interests always come first.” It will make recommendations to the board and to management to bolster training and professional development, he said. The firm has said the SEC’s case is “completely unfounded.” The stock dropped 23 percent since the SEC lawsuit was filed on April 16 through yesterday, making it the worst performer among the six largest U.S. banks by assets in 2010. First-quarter earnings were the second-highest for any quarter in the firm’s history. “We understand that there is a disconnect between how we as a firm view ourselves and how the broader public perceives our role and activities in the market,” Blankfein said. “To address this, we need a rigorous self-examination.” Share Performance Goldman Sachs rose $1.36, or 1 percent, to $143.68 at 1:10 p.m. in New York Stock Exchange composite trading . Christian Brothers Investment Services Inc. and the Needmor Fund, two investors who submitted the proposal on splitting the chairman and CEO roles, said in the proxy that separating the two jobs won an average 36.7 percent of the vote at 30 companies last year. Goldman Sachs’s board had unanimously opposed the idea, saying in the proxy that the current structure provides “clarity regarding leadership of the firm, allows the firm to speak with one voice and allows for efficient coordination of board action, particularly in times of market turmoil or crisis.” Three of Goldman Sachs’s largest competitors — Bank of America Corp., Citigroup Inc. and Morgan Stanley — have split the chairman and CEO roles in the past three years. Warren Buffett No investor owns more of the company’s stock than Goldman Sachs’s partners, who as a group had 7.4 percent of the shares as of March 8, according to the proxy. Warren Buffett ’s Berkshire Hathaway Inc. holds warrants that entitle the insurance and holding company to buy 7.6 percent of the company’s stock, while BlackRock Inc. had a 6.1 percent stake as of March 8, the proxy said. Buffett, speaking before Berkshire’s annual meeting on May 1, praised Blankfein and said he hopes he keeps running Goldman Sachs “this year, next year and 10 years from now.” Berkshire, based in Omaha, Nebraska, also holds $5 billion in preferred stock that pays a 10 percent dividend. The SEC suit accuses Goldman Sachs and a company executive director, Fabrice Tourre , of misleading investors in a mortgage- linked security about the role that a hedge fund, Paulson & Co., played in both selecting and betting against the obligation. New York-based Paulson wasn’t accused of wrongdoing. “There are a myriad of opportunities out there in the way we handle the case, and I wouldn’t rule any of them out,” Chief Operating Officer Gary Cohn said today after the meeting. Eleven days after the case was filed, current and former Goldman Sachs executives, including Blankfein and Tourre, endured almost 11 hours of questioning by the Senate’s Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations. The committee released e-mails that showed Goldman Sachs employees disparaging securities created by the firm with an expletive and referring to them as “junk.” To contact the reporter on this story: Christine Harper in New York at charper@bloomberg.net

Read the full article →