warren-buffett

U.S. Stocks Climb as Buffett Defends Goldman, Economic Data Signal Growth

May 3, 2010

By Rita Nazareth May 3 (Bloomberg) — U.S. stocks gained, rebounding from the biggest weekly drop since January, as Warren Buffett defended Goldman Sachs Group Inc. , manufacturing grew at the fastest pace since 2004 and personal income and spending rose. Goldman Sachs rallied 2.6 percent after Buffett said the bank shouldn’t be blamed for losses on mortgage bets at the center of a Securities and Exchange Commission fraud lawsuit. United Airlines parent UAL Corp. and Continental Airlines Inc. gained after agreeing to combine. Apple Inc. advanced 2 percent after saying it sold 1 million iPads in the first month of the tablet computer’s release. The Standard & Poor’s 500 Index rose 0.7 percent to 1,194.46 at 11:21 a.m. in New York. The Dow Jones Industrial Average climbed 85.87 points, or 0.8 percent, to 11,093.48. “The economy is showing improvement,” said Peter Jankovskis , who helps manage about $1.8 billion as co-chief investment officer at Oakbrook Investments in Lisle, Illinois. “Investors are reacting well to the personal income numbers. And we continue to see mergers. Also Warren Buffett’s comments on Goldman Sachs show that he’s doing a very responsible thing by not piling on pre-judging the situation.” Industrial shares had the biggest gain in the S&P 500, rising 1.4 percent collectively, after a gauge of U.S. manufacturing grew at the fastest pace since 2004. The Institute for Supply Management’s index of manufacturing rose to 60.4 in April from 59.6 a month earlier, according to the Tempe, Arizona-based group. Economists had forecast the gauge would rise to 60, according to a Bloomberg News survey. Manufacturers Gain Caterpillar Inc. , General Electric Co. and Boeing Co. gained at least 1 percent. U.S. stocks last week broke the Dow’s longest weekly winning streak since 2004 after credit downgrades for Greece, Portugal and Spain spurred concern that global economic growth will slow and prosecutors considered opening a fraud investigation against Goldman Sachs. Gains in European stocks were limited today on concern a 110 billion-euro ($146 billion) rescue package for Greece will fail to contain the region’s debt crisis. Consumer spending in the U.S. rose in March by the most in five months, pointing to a recovery that may accelerate when the economy creates more jobs. The 0.6 percent increase in purchases matched the median forecast of economists surveyed by Bloomberg News, Commerce Department figures showed. Incomes climbed for the first time this year, rising 0.3 percent. ‘Good Direction’ “Investors see that the U.S. is going towards a very good direction right now and they make the decision to invest more in the region as there is a currency risk in Europe,” said Andreas Lipkow , an equity trader at MWB Fairtrade Wertpapierhandelsbank AG in Frankfurt. About 78 percent of S&P 500 companies that have reported since first-quarter results have topped the average analyst estimate for net income, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. Goldman Sachs, Wall Street’s most profitable firm, rose 2.6 percent to $148.99. Buffett, who invested $5 billion in the bank in 2008, praised Goldman Sachs Chief Executive Officer Lloyd Blankfein . “He’s done a great job running that firm,” Buffett said in a Bloomberg Television interview before the annual shareholders meeting of his Berkshire Hathaway Inc. on May 1. “My choice would be to have Lloyd running it this year, next year and 10 years from now.” Berkshire Hathaway Class B shares were up 0.9 percent to $77.70. Airlines Gain The NYSE Arca Airline Index rose 1.3 percent. UAL and Continental said they see net annual synergies from their merger of $1 billion to $1.2 billion by 2013, “including between $800 million and $900 million of incremental annual revenues.” UAL rose 2.6 percent to $22.15. Continental Airlines gained 1.8 percent to $22.75. Alaska Air Group Inc. advanced 6.9 percent to $44.25. The airline may rise as much as 40 percent as the traffic around Seattle and Hawaii improves, and industry consolidation leaves fewer competitors, Barron’s reported. Apple gained 2 percent to $266.39. The company sold its millionth iPad on April 30 as customers lined up to buy the latest version of the tablet computer with access to AT&T Inc.’s wireless network. The iPad 3G went on sale at 5 p.m. on Friday, 28 days after the original model, which could only connect to the Web via Wi-Fi, was released. The touch-screen tablet computer is selling faster than the iPhone, Chief Executive Officer Steve Jobs said today in a statement. iPad Sales The iPad’s initial sales may be beating some analysts’ estimates . Customers probably bought about 300,000 iPad 3G’s this weekend, Piper Jaffray & Co. analyst Gene Munster said in a note yesterday. He said that means total iPad sales this quarter will likely exceed the 1.3 million he had predicted. Dr Pepper Snapple Group Inc gained 4.1 percent to $34.07. The beverage company was raised to “buy” from “hold” at Stifel Nicolaus by equity analyst Mark Swartzberg . The 12-month price estimate is $38 per share. Pozen Inc. surged 5 percent to $11.39. The Food and Drug Administration approved the medicine, called Vimovo, for use in arthritis patients who are at risk of developing gastric ulcers, the agency said today in an e-mail. Dollar Thrifty Automotive Group Inc. surged 14 percent to $50.07. Avis Budget Group Inc. said it would like to make a “substantially higher” counteroffer to Hertz Global Holdings Inc.’s bid to acquire the rental-car company. Hertz fell 4.8 percent to $13.76, while Avis declined 2.1 percent to $14.80. To contact the reporter on this story: Rita Nazareth in New York at rnazareth@bloomberg.net

Read the full article →

Buffett Says Berkshire Would Consider `Significant’ Acquisition in Japan

May 2, 2010

By Andrew Frye and Jamie McGee May 2 (Bloomberg) — Warren Buffett said he’d like Berkshire Hathaway Inc. to make a “significant” acquisition in Japan. No deal is on the horizon, Berkshire’s billionaire chairman and chief executive officer said today at a press conference in Omaha, Nebraska, a day after the company’s annual meeting of shareholders . He said an acquisition could come within five to 10 years, or five to 10 months. Buffett is prepared to spend as much as $10 billion on its next acquisition after the $27 billion purchase of railroad Burlington Northern Santa Fe Corp. in February, he said yesterday. Buffett said Berkshire has access to capital to finance a deal. “We’re as interested as ever,” Buffett said yesterday. “We wrote a big check and issued shares in connection with Burlington Northern.” To contact the reporters on this story: Andrew Frye in Omaha at afrye@bloomberg.net ; Jamie McGee in New York at jmcgee8@bloomberg.net .

Read the full article →

Buffett Names Goldman as Counterparty on Trades That Turned Against Him

May 2, 2010

By Andrew Frye and Jamie McGee May 2 (Bloomberg) — Warren Buffett said Goldman Sachs Group Inc. is among the counterparties on derivative trades that contributed to a first-quarter loss last year at his Berkshire Hathaway Inc. “Goldman Sachs is on the other side of some of our equity- put transactions,” Buffett said today at a press conference in Omaha, Nebraska, a day after Berkshire’s annual meeting of shareholders . To contact the reporters on this story: Andrew Frye in Omaha at afrye@bloomberg.net ; Jamie McGee in New York at jmcgee8@bloomberg.net .

Read the full article →

Kraft Made `Dumb Deals’ Buying Cadbury, Selling Pizza Brands, Buffett Says

May 2, 2010

By Andrew Frye and Jamie McGee May 1 (Bloomberg) — Billionaire Warren Buffett , whose Berkshire Hathaway Inc. has an 8 percent stake in Kraft Foods Inc., said the maker of Oreo cookies and Cheez Whiz blundered in the takeover of Cadbury Plc and the sale of its pizza brands. “Both deals were dumb,” Buffett told investors today in Omaha, Nebraska, where Berkshire is holding its annual shareholders’ meeting. “The pizza deal was particularly dumb.” Kraft in March acquired Uxbridge, England-based Cadbury for about 13.6 billion pounds ($20.8 billion) in cash and stock after a five-month pricing dispute. The deal transformed the Northfield, Illinois-based company into the world’s biggest confectioner, and Kraft said the acquisition would give it leading positions in emerging markets. Kraft Chief Executive Officer Irene Rosenfeld pursued Cadbury to gain control of its sales network in places such as India and Latin America. The deal, which married Kraft’s Oreo cookies with Cadbury’s Dairy Milk chocolate, was partially funded by the sale of Kraft’s DiGiorno and Tombstone pizza brands to Nestle SA. “I just hated to see them give up a significant portion of those businesses to buy Cadbury” at the price of the sale, Buffett said today. He had previously called the acquisition “a bad deal” based on Kraft’s share price at the time. ‘Dumb Things’ Buffett, who considered the pizza deal to be worth $2.7 billion because of tax considerations, has said that giving up a business that makes $280 million a year for that amount was “a mistake.” “We expect to do some dumb things, but we get mad when other people do dumb things,” Buffett said today. He called Rosenfeld a “perfectly capable” manager. Kraft spokesman Michael Mitchell said the deal “accelerates shareholder value” and that selling the pizza businesses was the right decision after fielding a “strong” offer from Nestle. “While we respect Mr. Buffett as an investor, we strongly believe that the Cadbury acquisition and the sale of our pizza business were absolutely the right decisions for the company,” Mitchell said in an e-mailed statement. To contact the reporter on this story: Andrew Frye in New York at afrye@bloomberg.net ; Jamie McGee in New York at jmcgee8@bloomberg.net .

Read the full article →

Buffett Says Derivatives Law May Spare Berkshire on Collateral Requirement

May 1, 2010

By Andrew Frye and Jamie McGee May 2 (Bloomberg) — Warren Buffett , who has warned about the dangers of unregulated derivatives, said a Senate plan to add oversight of the contracts probably won’t require his Berkshire Hathaway Inc. to put up collateral. “If the bill passes tomorrow, we would not have to post a dime,” Buffett said yesterday in Omaha, Nebraska, at Berkshire’s annual shareholders meeting. Lawmakers, who are seeking to impose collateral requirements on previously written derivatives, will probably focus only on companies that are deemed to be in weak financial condition, Buffett said. Buffett uses derivatives to speculate on the direction of equity markets and the credit quality of companies. Berkshire, where Buffett is chief executive officer, has about $63 billion at risk in its contracts. The firm has been pressing Congress to ensure that any new legislation won’t require it to put up funds as security against default on previously written contracts. “If for any reason the Treasury should go back and, in a more sweeping declaration, decide all past contracts be collateralized we would comply, naturally,” Buffett said. “And it will be no problem.” Buffett’s characterization of derivatives in 2003 as “weapons of mass destruction” was seized upon by President Barack Obama in a speech last month to rally support for reform. Credit-Default Swaps The plan for new regulation could require Berkshire to post billions of dollars if there is no exemption for previously written contracts involving stronger companies, said David Sokol , one of Buffett’s top lieutenants, in an interview yesterday. The derivatives proposal was designed in the Senate to establish collateral standards that ensure there is cash backing bets on the direction of stocks and commodities prices. American International Group Inc. needed a $182.3 billion U.S. bailout after failing to reserve for obligations on credit-default swaps. Derivatives, which allow farmers to hedge against declines in the price of wheat and airlines to protect themselves from rising fuel costs, are used by investors to make bets on stocks and bonds without buying the securities. “If you give human beings flexibility to do anything they damn well please, they will go plum crazy,” Berkshire Vice Chairman Charles Munger said at the meeting. “Of course, they did.” Buffett drew a comparison to venereal disease last year to illustrate how unregulated derivatives transactions among financial firms heighten default risk. Buffett exited a derivatives operation he acquired with the $18 billion purchase of reinsurer General Re in 1998. Mark Twain “A man who tries to carry a cat home by the tail will learn a lesson that can be learned in no other way,” Buffett said in his 2005 letter to shareholders, citing author Mark Twain. “If Twain were around now, he might try winding up a derivatives business. After a few days, he would opt for cats.” Berkshire lost $404 million through 2005 reducing General Re’s derivatives book from 23,218 contracts to 741, Buffett has said. The derivatives were mostly written by traders who weren’t adequately penalized for poor long-term performance, he said. “He understands stupid derivatives because he got out of them at Gen Re,” said Tom Russo , a partner at Gardner Russo & Gardner in Lancaster, Pennsylvania, which holds Berkshire stock. Berkshire’s current book of derivatives, constructed by Buffett, doesn’t pose the danger that portfolios at AIG or General Re did, Russo said. Buffett now uses derivatives as part of his investment strategy. In the case of his equity market bets, Berkshire gets an upfront payment from counterparties that Buffett is free to invest as he chooses until the contract’s maturity. Buffett has said that Berkshire doesn’t face the same risks as AIG because his contracts were negotiated to minimize or avoid the posting of collateral if long-term bets turn against Berkshire before the derivatives expire. To contact the reporters on this story: Andrew Frye in New York at afrye@bloomberg.net ; Jamie McGee in New York at jmcgee8@bloomberg.net .

Read the full article →

Buffett Says Goldman Shouldn’t Be Blamed for Clients’ Losing Mortgage Bets

May 1, 2010

By Andrew Frye and Jamie McGee May 1 (Bloomberg) — Berkshire Hathaway Inc. Chairman Warren Buffett said Goldman Sachs Group Inc. shouldn’t be blamed for losses suffered by clients who invested in mortgage bets at the center of a fraud suit filed by regulators against the bank. Buffett said he stands behind the bank, which was sued last month by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission for misleading clients who made wagers on home loans. The regulator said that firms including ABN Amro Bank NV weren’t told when they bet on collateralized debt obligations from Goldman Sachs that the hedge fund led by John Paulson picked mortgages in the investment and was betting on them to fail. “I can’t see what difference it makes if it were Paulson on the other side of the deal or Goldman Sachs or Berkshire Hathaway,” Buffett said today at his company’s annual meeting in Omaha, Nebraska. Buffett said it “wasn’t so obvious” when the investments were sold in 2007 that the housing market would collapse. Buffett, who is also Berkshire’s chief executive officer, invested $5 billion in Goldman Sachs in 2008 and has praised the bank for its risk management . Berkshire makes $500 million a year in interest on its Goldman Sachs preferred stock. The warrants Buffett negotiated as part of the deal give Berkshire the option to buy $5 billion of common stock for $115 a share. The shares closed at $145.20 yesterday. “I did not hold it against Goldman Sachs that an allegation has been made,” Buffett said. He said he’d review the case further “if it leads to something more serious.” Our Own Decision Senator Carl Levin , who led a subcommittee that questioned Goldman Sachs CEO Lloyd Blankfein on April 27, accused the bank of conflicts of interest for selling mortgage bets to clients as it cut its own housing exposure. Buffett said today that Berkshire has four decades of experience with Goldman Sachs and no expectation that the bank would offer investment advice or disclose its own stance on trades. “We are in the business of making our own decisions,” Buffett said. “They do not owe us a divulgence of their position.” To contact the reporter on this story: Andrew Frye in Omaha at afrye@bloomberg.net ; Jamie McGee in New York at jmcgee8@bloomberg.net .

Read the full article →

Buffett Says Goldman Shouldn’t Be Blamed for Clients’ Losing Mortgage Bets

May 1, 2010

By Andrew Frye and Jamie McGee May 1 (Bloomberg) — Berkshire Hathaway Inc. Chairman Warren Buffett said Goldman Sachs Group Inc. shouldn’t be blamed for losses suffered by clients who invested in mortgage bets at the center of a fraud suit filed by regulators against the bank. Buffett said he stands behind the bank, which was sued last month by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission for misleading clients who made wagers on home loans. The regulator said that firms including ABN Amro Bank NV weren’t told when they bet on collateralized debt obligations from Goldman Sachs that the hedge fund led by John Paulson picked mortgages in the investment and was betting on them to fail. “I can’t see what difference it makes if it were Paulson on the other side of the deal or Goldman Sachs or Berkshire Hathaway,” Buffett said today at his company’s annual meeting in Omaha, Nebraska. Buffett said it “wasn’t so obvious” when the investments were sold in 2007 that the housing market would collapse. Buffett, who is also Berkshire’s chief executive officer, invested $5 billion in Goldman Sachs in 2008 and has praised the bank for its risk management . Berkshire makes $500 million a year in interest on its Goldman Sachs preferred stock. The warrants Buffett negotiated as part of the deal give Berkshire the option to buy $5 billion of common stock for $115 a share. The shares closed at $145.20 yesterday. “I did not hold it against Goldman Sachs that an allegation has been made,” Buffett said. He said he’d review the case further “if it leads to something more serious.” Our Own Decision Senator Carl Levin , who led a subcommittee that questioned Goldman Sachs CEO Lloyd Blankfein on April 27, accused the bank of conflicts of interest for selling mortgage bets to clients as it cut its own housing exposure. Buffett said today that Berkshire has four decades of experience with Goldman Sachs and no expectation that the bank would offer investment advice or disclose its own stance on trades. “We are in the business of making our own decisions,” Buffett said. “They do not owe us a divulgence of their position.” To contact the reporter on this story: Andrew Frye in Omaha at afrye@bloomberg.net ; Jamie McGee in New York at jmcgee8@bloomberg.net .

Read the full article →

Sokol Praised by Buffett for NetJets Turnaround Amid Talk About Succession

May 1, 2010

By Andrew Frye May 1 (Bloomberg) — Warren Buffett , who hasn’t announced a successor at Berkshire Hathaway Inc. , praised David Sokol , the firm’s most visible lieutenant, for his work in turning around luxury flight operator NetJets Inc. “We are now operating NetJets at a very decent profit,” Buffett, 79, told Berkshire shareholders today in Omaha, Nebraska, at the company’s annual meeting. “I owe David Sokol enormous credit. He turned that thing around like no one could have.” Buffett, now in his fifth decade as Berkshire chief executive officer, often boasts about the collective ability of the scores of managers who report to him. Shareholders pay closer attention when he singles out an executive for praise. Accolades for Sokol, 53, reinsurance chief Ajit Jain and Geico Corp. CEO Tony Nicely have fueled talk in past years about who will be next to lead Berkshire. “Sokol clearly is it today,” Andrew Kilpatrick , who wrote the three-volume “Of Permanent Value: The Story of Warren Buffett,” said before the shareholders meeting. “If Buffett lives for a long time, it could be someone else.” Buffett’s esteem for the executives he oversees rises and falls as the group is tested in good markets and bad. In the last year, 65-year-old Richard Santulli , the NetJets founder, was dropped from shareholders’ lists of CEO contenders, and younger managers like Matthew Rose of railroad Burlington Northern Santa Fe Corp. joined Berkshire. Emerging Stars “New managerial stars may emerge and present ones will age,” Buffett told investors in his 2005 annual letter, laying out Berkshire’s approach to settling on his replacement. At the time, Berkshire had three “reasonably young” candidates who could take over should Buffett die suddenly, the CEO said. Sokol, Berkshire’s energy chief, added responsibility for NetJets in August. He has helped Buffett with an investment in China’s BYD Co. and a rescue package for Constellation Energy Group Inc. Shares in the Shenzhen-based electric-car maker have more than tripled in the last 12 months and Buffett reported a $917 million profit after Constellation reversed course. Berkshire is a “long-term investor” in BYD, Sokol said in an interview today in Omaha. Vice Chairman Charles Munger , 86, said the investment might not have happened without Sokol. “Dave Sokol helped,” Munger said. “I wasn’t sure I could get Warren to do this myself.” Sokol is “a first-class guy, but the other ones are, too,” Berkshire board member Thomas Murphy , 84, said of the CEO candidates in a Bloomberg Television interview on April 22. “And of course, it depends on when the decision is made. If Warren’s around here five years from now, it might not be the same. I hope he’s around five years from now.” ‘Not a Problem’ Buffett said today that the question of who’ll succeed him is “not a problem.” “For right now you want to be prepared,” Buffett said. “I had a physical. I came out fine. My doctor is not here today. It drives him nuts that I eat what I do and he can’t find anything wrong.” Buffett, also Berkshire’s chairman, acquires managerial talent by takeover. He and Munger target well-managed companies and entice CEOs into selling their firms by promising to leave management in place. Sokol sold MidAmerican Energy Holdings to Berkshire in 2000 for $8.3 billion, including assumed debt. Rose, 51, joined the firm in February with the $27 billion sale of Burlington Northern, the biggest takeover of Buffett’s career. Divided Duties Buffett’s responsibilities will be split, upon his death or retirement, among at least three people. A CEO will oversee the collection of more than 70 operating units assembled by Buffett and Munger, and an investment chief will be appointed to allocate capital and manage Berkshire’s portfolio. Buffett’s son Howard will probably assume the position of non-executive chairman to preserve the firm’s culture. Buffett’s eventual replacements will take charge of a $190 billion company whose composition and culture is largely the expression of just one person. The CEOs of each operating unit from Fruit of the Loom to Dairy Queen to Geico were vetted by Buffett in acquisitions and promotions. Shareholders, who turn out in the tens of thousands for the annual meeting, are drawn by Buffett the manager, as much as by the assortment of businesses he’s assembled. Sokol’s energy division accounted for 14 percent of Berkshire’s pretax profit last year, while insurance operations produced 61 percent, according to Bloomberg data. The underwriting businesses, which cover risks from car crashes to earthquakes, are overseen by several managers and provide Buffett with investable funds in addition to earnings. Ajit Jain Jain, 58, oversees about 30 people in a reinsurance division that gave Buffett access to $26 billion of funding for his investments as of Dec. 31. This accumulated premium, or so- called float, is generated from Jain’s bets on large risks like natural disasters. It’s so important to Berkshire that Buffett instructed shareholders on what to do if they’re ever faced with a shipwreck and a choice to save him, Munger or Jain. “Swim to Ajit,” Buffett said in his annual letter. At today’s meeting, Buffett praised Jain for running “a disciplined operation.” “Ajit cannot be replaced,” Buffett said. “When I tell you the value that Ajit has added to Berkshire, believe me, I’ve understated.” Nicely, 66, has reported to Buffett since Berkshire bought Geico in 1996, and has won praise from his boss for delivering profits and signing up new drivers. Nicely “continues to gobble up market share while maintaining disciplined underwriting,” Buffett said last year. Reviving NetJets Santulli, once considered a favorite to succeed Buffett, was caught off guard by the recession and allowed NetJets to slide into losses before leaving the firm. Sokol fired pilots and wrote down the value of airplanes to restore profits. “His leadership has been transforming,” Buffett said in his annual letter of Sokol’s work at NetJets. “After suffering a staggering loss of $711 million in 2009, the company is now solidly profitable.” Buffett also praised Grady Rosier , CEO of the McLane food distributor, in his annual letter, for turning in record profits as other Berkshire manufacturing, service and retailing units suffered in the economic decline. Buffett brought Comcast Corp. Chief Operating Officer Stephen Burke , 51, to Berkshire as a board member in December. To contact the reporter on this story: Andrew Frye in New York at afrye@bloomberg.net

Read the full article →

Berkshire Will Be a `Long-Term Investor’ in Chinese Electric Carmaker BYD

May 1, 2010

By Andrew Frye and Sapna Maheshwari May 1 (Bloomberg) — Berkshire Hathaway Inc. ’s David Sokol , one of Warren Buffett ’s top executives, said the company would be invested with China’s BYD Co. for a “very long time.” “We’re a long-term investor,” Sokol said in an interview at in Omaha, Nebraska, where Berkshire is holding its annual meeting. “They know we’re a supportive shareholder.” BYD Co., the Chinese maker of plug-in hybrid vehicles and rechargeable batteries, is preparing to sell electric cars in the U.S. Berkshire agreed in September 2008 to pay $231 million for a stake of approximately 10 percent in BYD through its MidAmerican Energy Holdings Co. Sokol is chairman at the unit and was appointed to Shenzhen-based BYD’s board of directors in August 2009. Buffett has invested in the world’s most populous nation through takeovers and stock purchases. His largest acquisition of a non-U.S. firm was Iscar Metalworking Cos., the Israeli company with operations in China. BYD said yesterday it’s locating its North American headquarters in downtown Los Angeles. The shares have more than tripled in the last 12 months in Hong Kong trading. To contact the reporter on this story: Andrew Frye in Omaha at afrye@bloomberg.net ; Sapna Maheshwari in New York at sapnam@bloomberg.net .

Read the full article →

Video: Murphy Says Buffett Has `Great Confidence’ in Goldman: Video

April 23, 2010

April 23 (Bloomberg) — Berkshire Hathaway Inc. Director Thomas Murphy talks with Bloomberg’s Betty Liu about Berkshire Chief Executive Officer Warren Buffett’s investment in Goldman Sachs Group Inc. after the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission sued the bank for fraud. Buffett injected $5 billion into Goldman Sachs in 2008, and remains comfortable with his investment, Murphy said, citing a telephone conversation with Buffett. The SEC has accused Goldman Sachs and an employee of misleading clients on the sale of mortgage-related investments. (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Video: Buffett’s Goldman Sachs Warrants Drop on SEC Lawsuit: Video

April 16, 2010

April 16 (Bloomberg) — The value of Warren Buffett’s options to buy Goldman Sachs Group Inc. shares dropped after regulators sued the bank for misleading clients on the sale of securities tied to the subprime mortgage market. The warrants give Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway Inc. the right to buy New York-based Goldman Sachs common stock for $115 a share. Bloomberg’s Brennan Lothery reports. (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Video: Bloomberg’s Liu Discusses Buffett’s Bet on Goldman Sachs: Video

April 16, 2010

April 16 (Bloomberg) — Bloomberg’s Betty Liu reports on Warren Buffett’s $5 billion investment in Goldman Sachs Group Inc. The investment was partly a bet on the “integrity” of the Wall Street firm, Berkshire Hathaway Inc. Director Ronald Olson told Bloomberg Television this week. Goldman was sued by U.S. regulators today for fraud tied to collateralized debt obligations that contributed to the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression. (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Buffett Reaps Dividend Millions Without Berkshire: Chart of the Day

April 5, 2010

By David Wilson April 5 (Bloomberg) — Warren Buffett earns millions of dollars of dividend income every quarter even though Berkshire Hathaway Inc., his insurance and investment company, has never made a payout. The money comes from the billionaire investor’s personal holdings in other U.S. companies, as disclosed in Berkshire’s quarterly filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission since 2006. The latest filing showed that he had multimillion- dollar stakes in 10 companies as of Dec. 31. The CHART OF THE DAY shows the total amount of quarterly dividends that he was due to receive, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. The calculations assume he kept his shares through the date of record for the next payout. Payouts to Buffett peaked at an estimated $15.5 million a quarter, judging by his publicly disclosed stakes as of Sept. 30 and Dec. 31, 2008. Last year, they tumbled as much as 44 percent as U.S. Bancorp and Wells Fargo & Co. , two of his holdings, cut dividends. The fourth-quarter figure was $10.8 million. Buffett’s portfolio at the end of 2009 included shares of three companies — Exxon Mobil Corp. , General Electric Co. and United Parcel Service Inc. — in which Berkshire and its units weren’t invested. Ingersoll-Rand PLC , Johnson & Johnson , Kraft Foods Inc. , Procter & Gamble Co. and Wal-Mart Stores Inc. were also among his personal stakes. The filings don’t show his non- U.S. investments or holdings of securities besides stocks. Dividend income helps explain why Buffett only receives $100,000 a year in salary at Berkshire , according to Robert P. Miles, the author of “Warren Buffett Wealth.” Miles wrote about him last week in an article on Morningstar Inc.’s Web site. (To save a copy of the chart, click here.) To contact the reporter on this story: David Wilson in New York at dwilson@bloomberg.net

Read the full article →

Fortune’s Stanley Bing: Value: Reality or Perception?

March 30, 2010

I can do no better this morning than to link to the Fortune Captain’s Blog , Managing Editor Andy Serwer’s discussion of the most valued companies in the current marketplace. The list is topped by Exxon (XOM), which is followed closely by Microsoft (MSFT) and Wal-Mart (WMT). Close on the heels of the big three are Apple (APPL), whose market cap towers majestically over its actual revenue, and Berkshire-Hathaway (BRKA), whose perceived value is driven by the general feeling that Warren Buffett, the Oracle of Omaha, can do no wrong, or more accurately that even when he does do something wrong it’s more right than other people’s right, if you take my meaning. If Warren doesn’t know what’s going on, nobody does. What strikes Andy in this list how sensible it is. Here’s what he says: To me what’s most instructive here is what these market valuations say about our economy and us. Each company has its own place, right? The most valuable company is our biggest energy source, Exxon. Microsoft makes the brains of what makes most of our PCs run. Wal-Mart is our biggest store. Berkshire, you could argue, is the best of American business, overseen by a genius. And Apple, run by another business genius, is kind of the cool future company. Its products are all about unlocking the promise of technology to make our lives more productive and more fun. Right now, Mr. Market seems to think that’s a pretty powerful formula. That’s a persuasive argument. Each in its place and a place for each. Energy. Technology. Even at the bottom of the top ten, a representative of the poor, battered finance sector, in JPMorgan Chase (JPM). And yet… Buried in the list there’s another take, isn’t there? Looking over it again, you have to wonder how much of the value of these enterprises is driven by a factor that is highly irrational: their stock price. How much of Apple, arguably one of the great companies in history, is driven by the perception that their leader is a genius, one of a kind, totally non-fungible? Can’t the same be said for Berkshire Hathaway? In fact, how much of any company’s stock price is at the whim of the idiots, hedgers, madmen and demented wizards who are out there every day, gambling on the future and forgetting about the past?

Read the full article →

Buffett Takes $100,000 Berkshire Salary While Arranging $27 Billion Deal

March 11, 2010

By Jamie McGee and Andrew Frye March 12 (Bloomberg) — Warren Buffett , the billionaire chairman of Berkshire Hathaway Inc. who pays the company for postage and personal phone calls, received a $100,000 salary for a 29th straight year as he arranged a $27 billion acquisition. Berkshire’s shareholder equity, a measure of assets minus liabilities, rose 20 percent to $131.1 billion in 2009 and annual net income climbed 61 percent to $8.06 billion. Buffett received no bonus in 2009 and he doesn’t get stock options or grants, Omaha, Nebraska-based Berkshire said late yesterday in a regulatory filing . “Considering that far-more-mortal executives have been paid far more for delivering far less, the standards of comparisons would warrant a monumental increase,” said Tom Russo , partner at Gardner Russo & Gardner in Lancaster, Pennsylvania, which holds Berkshire stock. “He could say, ‘I’m worth a billion a year,’” Russo said. “That’s not Buffett.” Buffett reimbursed Berkshire $50,000 last year to cover the cost of postage stamps, phone calls and staff time used for personal tasks, the company said in the filing. Vice Chairman Charles Munger , who also made a $100,000 salary, paid $5,500. Buffett and Munger don’t use company cars or belong to clubs paid for by Berkshire. Security Costs Berkshire reported $344,490 in costs for Buffett’s personal and home security. That’s up 9.1 percent from $315,709 in 2008. Buffett, 79, completed the purchase last month of railroad Burlington Northern Santa Fe Corp. for $27 billion, the biggest acquisition of his career. He built Berkshire into a $200 billion company over four decades, transforming a failing maker of men’s suit linings into an enterprise with businesses ranging from car insurance and underwear to power plants and corporate jet leasing. Buffett is also Berkshire’s chief executive officer as well as its largest shareholder. Since 2004, Berkshire’s compensation committee has determined salaries. Prior to that, Buffett recommended his own salary to the board. “He views the shareholders of Berkshire Hathaway as partners,” said Jeff Matthews , author of “Pilgrimage to Warren Buffett’s Omaha” and founder of the hedge fund Ram Partners LP. “If you have your own skin in the game, you own the shares of stock alongside your fellow shareholders and you make them a ton of money, you will make yourself a ton of money, and that’s the proper way to do it in his mind.” Stock Gain Berkshire’s Class A shares rose about 2.7 percent in 2009, ending the year at $99,200 on the New York Stock Exchange. The stock gained another 24 percent this year through yesterday to $123,453. The shares traded at about $15 when Buffett took control in 1965. Buffett was ranked the second-richest American by Forbes magazine, behind Bill Gates, Microsoft Corp. chairman and a Berkshire board member. Buffett has pledged the majority of his Berkshire holdings to the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation , which funds education and health initiatives, and to four family charities. The Gates donation is being made in annual installments, and will continue after Buffett’s death. Gates, 54, and other members of Berkshire’s board , were paid $2,700 to $7,000, compared with $2,700 to $6,700 in 2008. Buffett has criticized compensation of CEOs at poorly performing firms. The head of a failing company should be “destroyed himself financially,” he said on the Fox Business Network in January. “There ought to be a huge downside.” “He eats his own cooking,” Russo said. “It’s easy to talk a good game. It’s a lot harder to take 100 grand a year when he could make up any number he wants.” Buffett made $75,000 last year for his service on the board of Washington Post Co., the newspaper publisher that counts Berkshire as its biggest shareholder. He made the same amount in 2008 as a director on boards with Berkshire investments. Marc Hamburg , chief financial officer, made total compensation of $874,750, compared with $786,500 in 2008, an increase of about 11 percent. — Editors: Dan Reichl , Rick Green To contact the reporters on this story: Jamie McGee in New York at jmcgee8@bloomberg.net ; Andrew Frye in New York at afrye@bloomberg.net

Read the full article →

David D. Burstein: What You Can Do Right Now About The Debt

March 10, 2010

Last week Sen. Jim Bunning (R-Ky.) was mad as hell about the national debt and he wasn’t going to take it anymore. People across the political spectrum in elected office and everyday Americans have come to agree that our debt and deficits are out of control and something needs to be done. In that sense they’re on Senator Bunning’s side. They’re likely not on his side about filibustering a bill that would extend emergency unemployment benefits to millions of Americans who cannot wait. Bunning’s response to widespread criticism that this was “not the time for this” is perhaps a good one. We can’t keep saying everything is an emergency — which we frequently do — and kick the serious conversation about spending and deficits further down the road. As we know, Senator Bunning ultimately ended his one man filibuster, and the bill passed with bipartisan support. But he did manage to do what tactics like these are meant to do, draw attention to an important issue that otherwise would never get heard. But with all this talk about the debt including a never-ending series of bipartisan commissions (the latest of which was announced last month), where is the action? Well we don’t have to wait for Washington. Here’s a little known fact, there is something you can do right now to decrease the national debt: you can make a tax deductible donation that goes directly to pay down the debt. Last year this program, which has been in existence since 1961, only took in $3 million, and the largest single donation ever made in this program was $3.5 million. Hardly anyone knows about this program and the government rarely publicizes it. Understandably, giving any more money to the government than you are required to give isn’t the most popular idea. However, if people are really concerned about fiscal policy, this is something you can do to back it up. If concerned Americans could channel their fiscal anger into this effort, imagine the results… What if at the next tea party convention — made up of people who profess to be incredibly concerned about debt — they do something and gather money from attendees to pay down the debt? What if the government initiated a text $10 to your cell phone to pay down the debt campaign? What if the government met with wealthy individuals like Warren Buffett and asked them to consider making large donations and even encouraging other private donors to match it. Private public partnerships have been instituted across federal initiatives from education to energy, there is certainly a case for it in bringing down the national debt. I know this won’t get rid of our debt completely. We can’t fundraise our way out of debt, Washington needs to take action as well. But our debt is so high that almost any action Congress takes won’t come close to eliminating the debt for years to come. However, if we all pitch in and if a “fundraise for the debt” program is run as aggressively as a major not for profit fundraising effort, we could certainly make some inroads in bringing the debt down, and we could help. By clicking here you can make a donation to pay down the debt right now.

Read the full article →

Berkshire Discloses Increased Stakes in Sanofi-Aventis, Britain’s Tesco

February 27, 2010

By Hugh Son Feb. 27 (Bloomberg) — Billionaire investor Warren Buffett ’s Berkshire Hathaway Inc . disclosed increased stakes in drugmaker Sanofi-Aventis SA and Tesco Plc, Britain’s largest retailer. Berkshire’s holdings of Sanofi-Aventis rose about 14 percent to 25.1 million shares and the stake in Tesco rose 3.1 percent to 234.2 million shares, the Omaha, Nebraska-based company said in a regulatory filing today. Berkshire now owns 1.9 percent of Sanofi and 3 percent of Tesco. To contact the reporter on this story: Hugh Son in New York at hson1@bloomberg.net

Read the full article →

Watch Warren Buffett on Bloomberg Television

February 22, 2010

Feb. 22 (Bloomberg) — Tune in to Bloomberg Television at noon Eastern time for an interview with Warren Buffett. Click here for more information on Bloomberg Television. # # -0- Feb/22/2010 16:11 GMT

Read the full article →

GE’s Immelt Differs With Paulson’s Recollection of Financial Crisis Talks

February 10, 2010

By Rachel Layne Feb. 11 (Bloomberg) — General Electric Co. says Chief Executive Officer Jeffrey Immelt disagrees with former Treasury secretary Henry Paulson’s recollection of discussions involving commercial paper as the financial crisis swelled in September 2008. Paulson’s new book “On the Brink: Inside the Race to Stop the Collapse of the Global Financial System,” says he and Immelt discussed GE’s difficulty in selling commercial paper during a phone call on Sept. 8, 2008, and in person about 6 p.m. on Sept. 15, the day Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. filed for bankruptcy. “Now here was Jeff telling me that GE was finding it very difficult to sell its commercial paper for any term longer than overnight,” Paulson, whose book relies in part on memory, writes of the Sept. 15 conversation. “The fact that the single- biggest issuer in this $1.8 trillion market was having trouble with its funding was startling.” Immelt said he “does not believe they discussed having problems with GE’s” commercial paper in the conversations, GE spokeswoman Anne Eisele said. The company’s public disclosures during the period, in which the “markets were under great stress,” were accurate, she said. Those disclosures include a Sept. 14 memo to investors that said in part, “GE Capital’s commercial paper programs, which total $90 to $95 billion, remain robust.” GE Capital had 15 commercial paper programs in 11 currencies at an average funding cost of Libor less 25 basis points year-to-date in its largest market, the U.S., the memo said. Relying on Memory When asked about the discrepancy, Michele Davis, a spokeswoman for Paulson, referred to the author’s note in the book, which cites his reliance on memory rather than transcripts or notes. “To write this book, I called on the memories of many of the people who were with me during these events,” Paulson wrote. “Given the high degree of stress during this time and the extraordinary number of problems I was juggling in a single day, and often in a single hour, I am sure there are many details I will never recall.” Immelt is scheduled to interview Paulson about his book on Feb. 18 at New York City’s 92nd Street Y, according to the organization’s Web site . Paulson participated in a similar event on Feb. 9 with Berkshire Hathaway Inc.’s Warren Buffett. Fairfield GE climbed 9 cents to $15.69 yesterday in New York Stock Exchange composite trading . The shares have tumbled 41 percent since Sept. 12, 2008, the last trading day before Lehman Brothers’ bankruptcy filing. To contact the reporter on this story: Rachel Layne in Boston at rlayne@bloomberg.net

Read the full article →

Paulson Tells Buffett U.S. to Get `Every Penny’ of Bailout Back from Banks

February 9, 2010

By Andrew Frye Feb. 9 (Bloomberg) — Former Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson , responding to a question from billionaire Warren Buffett , said the U.S. government will be repaid in full for the funds it put into the country’s lenders. “We will get every penny we put into the banks back” and turn a profit, Paulson said today at a meeting of the Greater Omaha Chamber in Omaha, Nebraska. “I think when you look at all the other programs, we may be surprised at what we get back.” More than 700 U.S. banks, insurers and automakers applied to the U.S. for cash from the Treasury Department’s $700 billion Troubled Asset Relief Program. Borrowers including Bank of America Corp., JPMorgan Chase & Co. and Wells Fargo & Co. have returned more than $180 billion in bailout funds, according to Bloomberg data, and the Obama administration has proposed a levy on financial firms to recoup the government’s costs. Special Inspector General Neil Barofsky , the government watchdog monitoring the bailout, said last month that the entire TARP program, including the rescue of American International Group Inc., General Motors Co. and Chrysler Group LLC, will cost taxpayers less than previously predicted. An earlier Barofksy report to Congress said the final cost could be “substantial.” Paulson in 2008 injected capital into banks in exchange for preferred shares paying 5 percent and warrants to buy common stock. He appeared on stage at a meeting of the chamber of commerce alongside Buffett, whose Berkshire Hathaway Inc. is based in Omaha. Buffett asked questions of Paulson about the events surrounding the government bailouts as the two promoted Paulson’s book, “On the Brink.” “I think you’re right,” Buffett said when Paulson said the U.S. would recoup its investment. Buffett declined to comment after the event today. President Barack Obama last month proposed a fee on as many as 50 financial companies to recover losses from TARP. The levy would apply to firms with more than $50 billion in assets, including Wells Fargo and Goldman Sachs Group Inc., two companies that Berkshire has investments in. Buffett has said he opposes the administration’s plan. Buffett’s Suggestion Paulson wrote in the book, which was published last week, that a proposal from Buffett helped him hone the bailout to make it palatable to investors. During a private phone call late on Oct. 11, 2008, Buffett suggested charging banks 5 percent or 6 percent on the U.S. investments and raising the rate later, Paulson wrote. The Treasury team had been considering 7 percent or 8 percent. “I was convinced Warren’s was the best way to make the capital purchase program attractive to banks while giving them an incentive to pay back the government,” Paulson wrote. “Warren had a vested interest in this idea. But the truth was I was looking for an approach just like his: an investor-friendly plan that would protect the taxpayer” and encourage private investment. Lenders have bought back $121.9 billion in preferred stock from the TARP’s Capital Purchase Program, with almost $83 billion still outstanding, according to a Feb. 5 transaction report . The agency has collected about $4.03 billion from the sale of warrants in about 35 banks. Missed Payments The $2.33 billion government bailout of CIT Group Inc., the commercial lender that emerged from bankruptcy in December, has been wiped out after the reorganization. American International Group Inc., with a bailout from TARP and other government efforts valued at $182.3 billion, missed dividend payments due the U.S. More than 50 other financial institutions didn’t pay dividends in November, according a report from Treasury. Buffett’s Berkshire is the biggest investor in Goldman Sachs and Wells Fargo. His $5 billion investment in New York- based Goldman Sachs came on September 23, 2008, and Paulson wrote that that injection by Berkshire removed one of his worries. World’s Most Credible Investor “They’d found the most credible investor in the world, Warren Buffett,” Paulson wrote of Goldman Sachs, the firm he ran as chief executive officer and chairman until his appointment to George W. Bush’s cabinet in 2006. Berkshire earns a 10 percent dividend on the Goldman Sachs preferred shares and the right to buy $5 billion of the bank’s stock at $115 a share. The shares closed yesterday at $151.10 in New York. Buffett, according to Paulson’s account, told CNBC the day after his Goldman Sachs purchase that he wouldn’t have made the investment if he didn’t think Treasury’s $700 billion Troubled Asset Relief Program would pass Congress. TARP, originally devised as a way for the government to relieve banks of their bad debts, later became the capital purchase plan that Buffett helped shape. To contact the reporter on this story: Andrew Frye in New York at afrye@bloomberg.net .

Read the full article →

Job Openings in U.S. Increased in December for First Time in Three Months

February 9, 2010

By Timothy R. Homan Feb. 9 (Bloomberg) — Job openings in the U.S. rose in December for the first time in three months, signaling employers are gaining confidence in the economic recovery. Openings increased by 63,000 to 2.5 million, the Labor Department said today in Washington. Job vacancies climbed for state and local governments, the report showed. The figures indicate that the world’s largest economy, which expanded in the second half of 2009, may soon add jobs after payrolls unexpectedly dropped last month. Still, the labor market will take time to overcome the loss of 8.4 million jobs lost since the recession began in December 2007. “Today’s report is indicative of an improving labor market,” said Russell Price , a senior economist at Ameriprise Financial Inc. in Detroit. “Most segments of the economy are already seeing positives in terms of job growth.” The rate of job openings in December climbed to 1.9 percent from 1.8 percent, according to today’s report. The separations rate, which includes dismissals and those who quit their jobs, fell to 3.2 percent from 3.3 percent the prior month. Payrolls fell by 20,000 last month after a 150,000 decline in December, according to Labor Department figures released on Feb. 5. The unemployment rate unexpectedly dropped to 9.7 percent from 10 percent. Berkshire Cuts Some companies are still trimming payrolls. Warren Buffett ’s Berkshire Hathaway Inc. cut about 3,000 jobs since December after customers scaled back orders for building-related materials. “If you look at our carpet business, our brick business, our insulation business, all of those businesses have had significant reductions in employment,” Buffett said in an interview in Omaha, Nebraska, on Jan. 20. “The day the orders come in, we hire back. But there’s no reason to hire people if they don’t have anything to do.” Other businesses plan to resume hiring. Oracle Corp., completing the acquisition of Sun Microsystems Inc. last month, will hire 2,000 salespeople, President Charles Phillips said on Jan. 27. He said the hiring of new employees, who will sell Sun’s products directly to Oracle’s biggest customers, will start immediately. Job growth remains a challenge for the Obama administration almost a year after implementation of the $787 billion stimulus package. More than 4 million jobs have been lost since President Obama took office in January 2009. To contact the reporter on this story: Timothy R. Homan in Washington at thoman1@bloomberg.net

Read the full article →

Buffett Tells CTB Hog-Product Employees They’re on Farming `Superhighway’

February 6, 2010

By Andrew Frye Feb. 6 (Bloomberg) — Warren Buffett , the billionaire chairman of Berkshire Hathaway Inc. , told employees of the firm’s hog-products unit he expects the operation to expand for decades. “CTB has been moving ahead every year since we bought it,” Buffett said in a video posted on the Web site of CTB Inc., Omaha, Nebraska-based Berkshire’s agriculture-equipment unit. “We’ll hit a bump in the road every now and then but we’re looking at a superhighway out there in front of us.” Buffett became the second-richest American by investing in businesses he expects to grow for decades. He’s said his $26 billion takeover of railroad Burlington Northern Santa Fe Corp. , announced in November, will benefit Berkshire “over the next century.” CTB, which Berkshire bought in 2002, may produce profits beyond the year 2200, Buffett, 79, said in the video. “Most years are going to be good, a few years will be standouts, and there will be a few that are bummers,” Buffett said. “But that’s the way we look at everything here at Berkshire Hathaway. We’re going to be in these businesses for 100 years or 200 years.” CTB, which sells feeders and stalls under the PigTek and Chore-Time Hog brands, has expanded abroad by buying businesses in Israel, Germany and the Netherlands. Chief Executive Officer Victor Mancinelli persuaded Buffett to buy his firm. Howard Buffett , a farmer and the billionaire’s son, endorsed the deal. Good Things “I checked with Howie; he told me CTB was an absolute first-class company and he’d heard good things about Vic,” Buffett said. “Howie would rather spend an evening on a tractor in the field than a date with Angelina Jolie , which is not true of all members of the family, but that’s true of Howie.” Howard Buffett has been picked to succeed his father as Berkshire’s chairman when Warren Buffett’s tenure, entering its fifth decade, comes to a close. The elder Buffett, who owns about a quarter of Berkshire and is its CEO, has said settling on his eventual replacement as chief is the No. 1 responsibility of the firm’s board. In the CTB video, Buffett praised Mancinelli. “Vic is a manager that could run any company in the Fortune 500,” Buffett said. “He’s done a wonderful job for us.” U.S. hog farmers have shrunk the size of sow herds to the smallest since at least 1976, as feed prices jumped to a record in 2008 and the recession and an outbreak of swine flu sapped pork demand in 2009. ‘Year After Year’ “There will be low prices and there will be high prices,” Buffett said. “But the one thing you can be sure about is that our industry is going to be there year after year after year.” Berkshire’s acquisition of CTB was valued at $177 million, according to Bloomberg data. Six years later, in 2008, the unit produced pretax earnings of $89 million, Buffett said in the company’s 2009 annual letter. CTB bought six companies in the interim, including Swine Services Specialists Inc. and Porcon group of Deurne, the Netherlands. “The CTB story is just starting,” Buffett said. “I am 79 so I’ll be 100 in 2030. Stay tuned for a rebroadcast at that time and I’ll be telling you about all kinds of wonderful things that have happened in the company. It’s in the right industry. Farming is as fundamental as things get in this country.” To contact the reporter on this story: Andrew Frye in New York at afrye@bloomberg.net .

Read the full article →

Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway Loses Its AAA Rating

February 4, 2010

OMAHA, Neb. — Standard & Poor’s has followed through on its warning and lowered Berkshire Hathaway Inc.’s long-term credit rating Thursday as the Omaha firm readies to acquire Burlington Northern Santa Fe Corp. The ratings agency lowered Berkshire’s rating one notch to “AA+” from “AAA,” its highest designation. S&P also removed the ratings from CreditWatch, where they were placed with negative implications in November, and called the outlook stable. Berkshire Hathaway officials didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment. S&P said it expects a significant part of the cash portion to come from Berkshire Hathaway’s core insurance operations, and the $26.3 billion railroad purchase will reduce the liquidity of the company’s insurance operations. Shareholders of BNSF are scheduled to vote on the proposed acquisition Feb. 11. The deal is expected to close by Feb. 15. “The rating actions are based on our view that Berkshire’s overall capital adequacy, as well as that of its insurance operations, has weakened to levels no longer consistent with a ‘AAA’ rating and is not expected to return to extremely strong levels in the near term,” Standard & Poor’s credit analyst John Iten said in a statement. “Furthermore, we expect that the consolidated liquidity position of Berkshire will be reduced from extremely strong historical levels as a result of the acquisition.” In the ratings agency’s view, investment risk remains very high, “compounding the need for extremely strong capital and liquidity given potential investment volatility.” With the downgrade, just four U.S. industrial companies maintain S&P’s “AAA” rating: Microsoft Corp., Exxon Mobil Corp., Johnson & Johnson and Automatic Data Processing Inc. More than a dozen U.S. financial institutions, including the Knights of Columbus and New York Life Insurance Co., hold the highest designation. The acquisition of Burlington Northern Santa Fe, the nation’s second-largest railroad, would be the biggest ever for Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway investment company. Berkshire Hathaway, based in Omaha, Neb., owns a 22 percent stake in Burlington Northern and would buy up the rest under the deal. Berkshire shareholders last month approved splitting the company’s Class B shares 50-for-1 as part of the deal. The split will enable Berkshire to offer even small Burlington Northern shareholders Berkshire stock as part of the acquisition of the nation’s second-largest railroad. The stock split also made Berkshire’s Class B stock much more affordable, at roughly $69 per share, which is expected to increase Berkshire’s liquidity. The Class A shares, which remain the most expensive U.S. stock at more than $100,000, won’t be split. The Class A shares hold more voting rights than the Class B shares. Berkshire Hathaway also filed documents Thursday indicating that it plans to sell $8 billion of debt to finance the acquisition using a combination of fixed-rate and floating-rate notes of various maturities. The Class B shares fell $1.75, or 2.4 percent, to $72.61 in afternoon trading, losing 16 cents more in after-hours trading.

Read the full article →

Berkshire’s B Stock Will Join S&P 500 in Place of Burlington; Shares Surge

January 26, 2010

By Nick Baker Jan. 26 (Bloomberg) — Berkshire Hathaway Inc., Warren Buffett’s insurance and investment company, will join the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index. Berkshire Hathaway’s Class B shares will replace Burlington Northern Santa Fe Corp. after buying the railroad, S&P said in a statement on its Web site.

Read the full article →

Buffett Tells Fox CEOs, Spouses Should Forfeit Assets If Their Banks Fail

January 21, 2010

By Jamie McGee Jan. 21 (Bloomberg) — President Barack Obama ’s proposals to regulate banks should include a requirement that chief executive officers and their spouses forfeit their assets when companies fail, billionaire Warren Buffett said on the Fox Business Network today. “There ought to be a huge downside,” said Buffett, whose Berkshire Hathaway Inc. is the largest shareholder in Wells Fargo & Co. “Make it so that the CEO of an institution that fails, or goes to the government and needs help, really gets destroyed himself financially. Why should he come out any better than somebody that gets laid off as an auto worker at General Motors?” Buffett, who collects a $100,000 salary as Omaha, Nebraska- based Berkshire’s leader, said CEOs should act as “chief risk officer.” He has criticized bankers for failing to realize that housing prices could fall. Obama today introduced a plan that he said would reduce risk-taking by financial institutions. The proposal is part of an effort to overhaul financial regulations and would specifically prohibit banks from running proprietary trading operations or investing in hedge funds and private equity funds. Banks conduct proprietary trading for their own benefit, not for that of their clients. Buffett said he hadn’t had an opportunity to review the administration’s proposal. He supported Obama’s campaign for president. To contact the reporter on this story: Jamie McGee in New York at jmcgee8@bloomberg.net

Read the full article →

Stiglitz Urges Second Round of Stimulus to Avert a `Double-Dip’ Recession

January 20, 2010

By Carol Massar and Joshua Zumbrun Jan. 20 (Bloomberg) — Columbia University professor Joseph Stiglitz , a Nobel Prize-winning economist, said the U.S. should inject a second round of stimulus spending into the economy to avert a “double-dip” recession. It will be “2012 or 2013 at the earliest that we will be back to normality,” Stiglitz said in an interview today on Bloomberg Television. “This is a scenario that is putting us a little better but not much better than the Japanese malaise.” Stiglitz said state governments face a shortfall of $200 billion per year in tax revenue that stimulus spending should fill. Other priorities should be writing down principal on underwater mortgages and passing new financial regulation legislation, which Stiglitz said would be difficult to accomplish. Stiglitz’s concern contrasts with Warren Buffett ’s outlook. Buffett said today on Bloomberg Television, “I do not know when things will get better. I have never been more optimistic about the future of the United States and the world.” The finance industry “did not allocate financial capital well but boy did they use their political capital well,” Stiglitz said. “They bought deregulation, they got bailouts that were on very favorable terms and now they’re being quite successful in fighting the restructuring of the regulatory framework.” To contact the reporter on this story: Carol Massar in New York at cmassar@bloomberg.net ; Joshua Zumbrun in Washington at jzumbrun@bloomberg.net

Read the full article →

Swiss Re Sells Buffett U.S. Life Block for $1.3 Billion to Improve Capital

January 18, 2010

By Carolyn Bandel Jan. 18 (Bloomberg) — Swiss Reinsurance Co. , the world’s second-largest reinsurer, sold Warren Buffett ’s Berkshire Hathaway Inc. a block of closed U.S. individual life reinsurance business to cut risk and improve its capital position. Swiss Re will use the additional 300 million Swiss francs ($293 million) of capital generated for higher-margin life and health, property and casualty reinsurance, the Zurich-based reinsurer said today. The company received a 1.3 billion-franc ceding commission in return for the 1.9 billion francs of life assets transferred to Berkshire, it said. “This is clearly not a game-changing transaction for us,” Chief Financial Officer George Quinn said during a conference call from Zurich. “There is a net cash flow to them, but that ignores the fact that we are also transferring a very large chunk of liabilities.” Swiss Re is reducing risky securities after replacing Jacques Aigrain as chief executive officer 11 months ago and reporting about $8.6 billion in losses and writedowns, the second-highest among European insurers. It increased surplus capital to more than 6 billion francs at the end of September as it bids to regain its AA credit rating and repay the 3 billion francs injected by Buffett last February. “The reduction of business risk is good,” said Georg Marti , a Zurich-based analyst with Zuercher Kantonalbank. “The transferred portfolio seems to be less profitable than the average of the group.” Swiss Re fell 0.8 percent to 49.71 francs as of 11:43 a.m. in Zurich trading, giving the reinsurer a market capitalization of 18.4 billion francs. “The increase to the 6 billion francs plus of surplus risk capital as at third quarter is helpful toward the repayment of the Buffett convertible from March 2011,” Ben Cohen , a London- based analyst with Collins Stewart, wrote in a note to investors. Swiss Re will continue to provide administration and reporting services for the life business sold to Buffett, said spokesman Adalbert Koch . The reinsurer will report the sale, effective from October 2009, in the first quarter of this year. To contact the reporter on this story: Carolyn Bandel in Zurich at cbandel@bloomberg.net

Read the full article →

Ackman Buys 2% of Kraft, Urges Rosenfeld to Use More Cash in Cadbury Offer

January 15, 2010

By Christine Richard and Zachary R. Mider Jan. 15 (Bloomberg) — William Ackman’s Pershing Square Capital Management LP bought a 2 percent stake in Kraft Foods Inc. and is urging management to pursue a bid for Cadbury Plc that minimizes the stock component of the offer. The stake of at least 32 million shares, valued at about $932 million based on yesterday’s closing price , will be disclosed in a filing with U.K. regulators on Jan. 18, Ackman said in an interview today. Kraft Chief Executive Officer Irene Rosenfeld has until Jan. 19 to modify Kraft’s current 10.9 billion-pound ($17.7 billion) stock-and-cash offer for the Uxbridge, England-based confectioner. “We think very highly of Irene Rosenfeld and her business plan. We think this deal makes tremendous strategic sense,” Ackman said, adding that Kraft shares are undervalued. “The more Kraft stock they issue, the less interesting this deal is. Fortunately, the seller also prefers cash.” Ackman is the second high-profile Kraft investor to weigh in on the Northfield, Illinois-based food company’s offer. Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway Inc., Kraft’s biggest shareholder, said on Jan. 5 that Kraft’s stock is undervalued. To contact the reporter on this story: Zachary R. Mider in New York at zmider1@bloomberg.net

Read the full article →

Ackman Buys 2% Stake in Kraft, Favors Cadbury Bid

January 15, 2010

By Christine Richard and Zachary R. Mider Jan. 15 (Bloomberg) — William Ackman’s Pershing Square Capital Management LP bought a 2 percent stake in Kraft Foods Inc. and is urging management to pursue a bid for Cadbury Plc that minimizes the stock component of the offer. The stake of at least 32 million shares, valued at about $932 million based on yesterday’s closing price , will be disclosed in a filing with U.K. regulators on Jan. 18, Ackman said in an interview today. Kraft Chief Executive Officer Irene Rosenfeld has until Jan. 19 to modify Kraft’s current 10.9 billion-pound ($17.7 billion) stock-and-cash offer for the Uxbridge, England-based confectioner. “We think very highly of Irene Rosenfeld and her business plan. We think this deal makes tremendous strategic sense,” Ackman said, adding that Kraft shares are undervalued. “The more Kraft stock they issue, the less interesting this deal is. Fortunately, the seller also prefers cash.” Ackman is the second high-profile Kraft investor to weigh in on the Northfield, Illinois-based food company’s offer. Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway Inc., Kraft’s biggest shareholder, said on Jan. 5 that Kraft’s stock is undervalued. To contact the reporter on this story: Zachary R. Mider in New York at zmider1@bloomberg.net

Read the full article →

Ackman Buys 2% Stake in Kraft, Favors Cadbury Bid

January 15, 2010

By Christine Richard and Zachary R. Mider Jan. 15 (Bloomberg) — William Ackman’s Pershing Square Capital Management LP bought a 2 percent stake in Kraft Foods Inc. and is urging management to pursue a bid for Cadbury Plc that minimizes the stock component of the offer. The stake of at least 32 million shares, valued at about $932 million based on yesterday’s closing price , will be disclosed in a filing with U.K. regulators on Jan. 18, Ackman said in an interview today. Kraft Chief Executive Officer Irene Rosenfeld has until Jan. 19 to modify Kraft’s current 10.9 billion-pound ($17.7 billion) stock-and-cash offer for the Uxbridge, England-based confectioner. “We think very highly of Irene Rosenfeld and her business plan. We think this deal makes tremendous strategic sense,” Ackman said, adding that Kraft shares are undervalued. “The more Kraft stock they issue, the less interesting this deal is. Fortunately, the seller also prefers cash.” Ackman is the second high-profile Kraft investor to weigh in on the Northfield, Illinois-based food company’s offer. Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway Inc., Kraft’s biggest shareholder, said on Jan. 5 that Kraft’s stock is undervalued. To contact the reporter on this story: Zachary R. Mider in New York at zmider1@bloomberg.net

Read the full article →

David M. Abromowitz: Mad About Bonuses? Let’s Make a Deal

January 15, 2010

The bonuses will be paid , the amounts will strike many as obscene, and the anger will grow. If you are mad as hell and ready to do something about it — talk taxes. We , the taxpayers, faced with a near collapse of the country’s financial system, were begged to invest trillions to keep the system going. Goldman Sachs leader turned Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson told us in September 2008 that without this intervention, our system would self destruct. But not to worry, he told us , in selling his original version of TARP . If we hand over vast sums : “The ultimate taxpayer protection will be the stability this troubled asset relief program provides to our financial system, even as it will involve a significant investment of taxpayer dollars. I am convinced that this bold approach will cost American families far less than the alternative — a continuing series of financial institution failures and frozen credit markets unable to fund economic expansion,” So we did our part. To be sure, by and large the country as a whole benefited. But the biggest rewards from our collective open checkbook — consisting of TARP, Fed access to its low interest borrowing, the funding of AIG that allowed many investment banks to avoid losses, and many other costly investments — flowed not to the millions of unemployed. It didn’t create a wage hike for average workers. It didn’t boost the pay of police, firefighters and other people who keeps us safe every day. And it certainly didn’t open the floodgates of loans to small businesses. It did enable what apparently will be record bonuses , paid at the very same institutions that were almost wiped out. In this case, it is actually pretty easy to draw a straight line between our tax dollars and the enormous profits flowing to a very few. And many are asking: “If it’s our money, why are a small number of high rollers putting it in their pockets?” The anger boiling over has led to calls for many things — salary caps, in particular. But in our system, government deciding what is the right pay for a given job doesn’t work very well. Instead, because the public took a big risk by putting up our money, we should get a big return. Hank Paulson, a consummate dealmaker for decades when handling investment bank money, apparently forgot to cut the same deal when he was a steward for the public’s money. But it is not too late to correct the problem. What government can do is adjust tax rates to fit the circumstances. If someone is getting a million dollar or greater payout for 2009, it is pretty clearly fueled by what America did with its money. Would an even split — 50% for the bonus windfall recipient, 50% for the public — be a fair deal ? Should we have gotten even a 60/40 or better deal if it were cut before the funds began to flow to the biggest financial institutions in the country? Congress at one point apparently thought a 90% split back to the public was fair, at least for a while. A 50% share back to the American taxpaying public would be relatively mild by comparison. Raising the top marginal tax rate to be paid by earners of extremely high incomes is not about punishing work, or class warfare, or any of the other slogans that conservatives frequently throw up against a serious discussion of tax policy. Instead, it is about a fair allocation of responsibility for an America in which it is possible to earn $10 million in a year. It is about paying for the recovery of the country in a time of high unemployment, the cost of 2 wars, and a decade of benefits from earlier tax cuts. It is also a recognition that self-made fortunes are never entirely self-made. As Warren Buffett has made the point: “I’ll bet a million dollars against any member of the Forbes 400 who challenges me that the average (federal tax rate including income and payroll taxes) for the Forbes 400 will be less than the average of their receptionists.” This year he should extend the bet to a whole host of bonus recipients and other high earners, and see if he gets any takers — he hasn’t so far. Some angry Americans are out in the streets calling for fiscal discipline, taking personal responsibility, and not saddling future generations with our debts. Fair enough — if you aim that responsibility back at the so few who have benefited so much from the dollars of so many. David Abromowitz is a Senior Fellow at the Center for American Progress, www.americanprogress.org

Read the full article →

Frank Rich: The Other Plot To Wreck America

January 9, 2010

THERE may not be a person in America without a strong opinion about what coulda, shoulda been done to prevent the underwear bomber from boarding that Christmas flight to Detroit. In the years since 9/11, we’ve all become counterterrorists. But in the 16 months since that other calamity in downtown New York — the crash precipitated by the 9/15 failure of Lehman Brothers — most of us are still ignorant about what Warren Buffett called the “financial weapons of mass destruction” that wrecked our economy. Fluent as we are in Al Qaeda and body scanners, when it comes to synthetic C.D.O.’s and credit-default swaps, not so much.

Read the full article →

Frank Rich: The Other Plot To Wreck America

January 9, 2010

THERE may not be a person in America without a strong opinion about what coulda, shoulda been done to prevent the underwear bomber from boarding that Christmas flight to Detroit. In the years since 9/11, we’ve all become counterterrorists. But in the 16 months since that other calamity in downtown New York — the crash precipitated by the 9/15 failure of Lehman Brothers — most of us are still ignorant about what Warren Buffett called the “financial weapons of mass destruction” that wrecked our economy. Fluent as we are in Al Qaeda and body scanners, when it comes to synthetic C.D.O.’s and credit-default swaps, not so much.

Read the full article →

Berkshire Plans to Keep Symetra Shares After IPO in `Vote of Confidence’

January 6, 2010

By Jamie McGee Jan. 6 (Bloomberg) — Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway Inc. and White Mountains Insurance Group Ltd. , the two largest shareholders in insurer Symetra Financial Corp. , won’t cut their stakes when the company sells stock to the public this year. Berkshire and White Mountains led the investor group that formed the life and health insurer in 2004 and each will keep their 26.9 million common shares when the company completes a planned initial public offering, Bellevue, Washington-based Symetra said today in a registration statement. Symetra said in previous regulatory filings that the companies might sell their stakes, which each equal 26 percent of existing shares. “It’s certainly a vote of confidence regarding Warren Buffett’s long-term view of the business,” said Paul Bard , vice president of research at Renaissance Capital, an IPO research firm in Greenwich, Connecticut. “When he makes an investment call, investors take notice.” Stock picks by Buffett, the second-richest American, are watched by mutual funds and individuals hoping to duplicate his investing success. Omaha, Nebraska-based Berkshire kept its stake in Verisk Analytics Inc. when that company went public in October, while other owners such as American International Group Inc. and Travelers Cos. sold shares. Verisk, which sells actuarial data to insurers, has jumped 39 percent. Symetra plans to raise as much as $434.7 million in an initial public offering of 31 million shares, today’s filing said. The target figure was scaled back from a planned sale of as much as $575 million that had been listed in a Dec. 29 registration statement. ‘A Great Sign’ Investors formed Symetra in 2004 by buying insurance and investment units from Safeco Corp. , the property insurer bought by Liberty Mutual Group Inc. in 2008. Berkshire’s decision to retain the shares is “a great sign,” said Francis Gaskins , president of IPOdesktop.com in Marina del Rey, California. “The fact that he is holding his stock is a definite plus,” Gaskins said. “It gives the institutional investors a feeling of security.” Berkshire, where Buffett is chairman and chief executive officer, typically gets about half its profit from insurance units including General Re Corp. and car insurer Geico Corp. Symetra has reinsurance agreements with General Re, sold medical and life protection with Berkshire’s MidAmerican Energy Holdings Co. in 2006, and provided part of the coverage for Berkshire’s Nebraska Furniture Mart last year, today’s filing said. Symetra’s life unit held $3.6 million in Berkshire Class B shares on Sept. 30, the company said in the filing. Buffett didn’t respond to a request for comment sent in an e-mail to assistant Carrie Kizer . Eric Brielmann , a spokesman for White Mountains, declined to comment. Bank of America Corp. , JPMorgan Chase & Co., Goldman Sachs Group Inc. and Barclays Plc are co-managing the stock sale. To contact the reporter on this story: Jamie McGee in New York at jmcgee8@bloomberg.net

Read the full article →

Hershey Board Members Are Said to Be Divided on Cadbury Bid to Rival Kraft

January 5, 2010

By Zachary Mider and Duane D. Stanford Jan. 5 (Bloomberg) — Hershey Co. ’s executives and board members are divided on whether to make a bid for Cadbury Plc and have yet to arrange financing for an offer, according to people with knowledge of the matter. The board met yesterday without reaching a decision, said the people, who declined to be identified because the talks are private. Some members of Hershey’s controlling trust, led by former Pennsylvania Attorney General Leroy Zimmerman , have been advocating a deal, while Chief Executive Officer David West is among those concerned about the debt a purchase would entail, the people said. An offer would compete with Kraft Foods Inc. ’s 10.9 billion pound ($17 billion) hostile bid and would involve swallowing a company more than twice Hershey’s size. To fund a purchase, Hershey may pledge to sell assets such as the U.S. rights to the Kit Kat and Rolo brands or Cadbury operations in certain countries, the people said. “A bid does make a lot of sense but they would have to incur some debt,” said Roy Behren , who helps manage $2.4 billion at Westchester Capital Management in Valhalla, New York. “I don’t know to what extent they’re willing to risk the investment grade credit rating.” Kirk Saville , a spokesman for Hershey, declined to comment. Tim Reeves , a spokesman for the Hershey Trust, declined to comment. Kraft said today it would boost the cash portion of its offer, as investor Warren Buffett objected to Kraft’s proposal to issue millions of shares to finance the deal. The larger cash component was expected by Hershey and doesn’t preclude a bid for Uxbridge, U.K.-based Cadbury, the people said. Looking for Investors “If Hershey was seriously thinking about making an offer for Cadbury , the last 24 hours’ news makes it easier for them to make it attractive to Cadbury shareholders,” said Sachin Shah , a special situations and merger arbitrage strategist at Capstone Global Markets LLC in New York. Hershey, with the help of former Goldman Sachs Group Inc. banker Byron Trott and his new firm, BDT Capital Partners, is looking for investors such as wealthy individuals to buy equity in the combined company , the people said. JPMorgan Chase & Co. and Bank of America Corp. are in talks over providing billions of dollars in loans for the deal, they said. A spokeswoman for BDT Capital declined to comment. Hershey hasn’t yet obtained formal commitments for either the equity or the loans as it continues to debate whether to move forward, the people said. The company is unlikely to team up with private-equity firms, they said. Hershey rose 95 cents, or 2.6 percent, to $37.17 today in New York Stock Exchange composite trading , while Cadbury dropped 26 pence to 779 pence in London. Kraft added $1.34 to $28.77. Based on that closing price , Kraft’s cash-and-stock offer values Cadbury at 766 pence a share. To contact the reporters on this story: Zachary Mider in New York at zmider1@bloomberg.net ; Duane D. Stanford in Atlanta dstanford2@bloomberg.net .

Read the full article →

Video: Shields Says Buffett May Think Moody’s Has Lost `Moat’: Video

December 24, 2009

Dec. 24 (Bloomberg) — Meyer Shields, an analyst at Stifel Nicolaus & Co., talks with Bloomberg’s Betty Liu about Warren Buffett’s investments. Shields says Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway Inc. may be reducing its stake in Moody’s Corp. because the billionaire chairman believes the ratings firm has less of a “moat” protecting it from competitors. (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Buffett Says Burlington Acquisition Prompted by Prospects for U.S. West

December 21, 2009

By Andrew Frye Dec. 21 (Bloomberg) — Billionaire Warren Buffett , chairman of Berkshire Hathaway Inc. , told employees of Burlington Northern Santa Fe Corp. that he’s buying the railroad because of its position in the U.S. West. “I think the West is going to do well,” Buffett told workers of Burlington Northern during an in-house interview with the railroad’s chief executive officer, Matthew Rose . “I’d rather be in the West than the East.” The $26 billion purchase of Fort Worth, Texas-based Burlington Northern is the biggest of Buffett’s career, and what he called an “all-in wager” on the U.S. economy. Burlington stands to benefit from an increase in shipments of goods from the U.S.’s Asian trading partners, including China. “I think I know how the country is going to develop,” Buffett, 79, said in the interview, which was posted in a video on Burlington Northern’s intranet and distributed today in a regulatory filing as a transcript. Buffett divested Berkshire’s equity stakes in two competing railroads, Omaha-based Union Pacific Corp. and Norfolk Southern Corp. of Norfolk, Virginia, as part of the Burlington Northern transaction, he has said. China ran up a record $266 billion trade surplus with the U.S. last year. China, the second-largest U.S. trading partner after Canada, may boost exports by 20 percent in the first quarter of 2010 as the global economy recovers, according to Macquarie Securities Ltd. and Royal Bank of Scotland Group Plc. Berkshire declined $2,099 to $98,800 today on the New York Stock Exchange and has advanced 2.3 percent this year. Burlington Northern rose 8 cents today to $98.40 and is up 30 percent this year. The companies said the merger may be completed in the first quarter. Berkshire’s Debt Buffett, Berkshire’s CEO, is taking out $8 billion of debt to finance the purchase and risking Berkshire’s AAA credit rating, which Standard & Poor’s has said it may cut. He told the Burlington Northern employees that he won’t sell the railroad’s assets to pay debt and plans to continue investing in the company’s infrastructure. “It’d be crazy if we didn’t,” Buffett said. “We’re not going to buy a business and starve it.” Buffett and a staff of about 20 people in Omaha oversee a collection of Berkshire operating companies that employ more than 200,000 and sell goods and services including energy, candy, clothing and luxury flights. Burlington Northern brings Berkshire another 40,000 workers, and Buffett said the takeover won’t have an effect on employment. “We’ve got 20 people in Omaha, and there isn’t one of them that knows how to run a railroad,” Buffett said. “You’ll be running the railroad, and you’ll run it in an efficient way, and when times are good, you’re going to have more people employed than when times are bad.” To contact the reporter on this story: Andrew Frye in New York at afrye@bloomberg.net .

Read the full article →

U.S. Treasury Delays Sale of Citigroup Stake as Shares Priced at Discount

December 16, 2009

By Michael J. Moore and Michael Tsang Dec. 16 (Bloomberg) — The U.S. Treasury Department delayed the sale of its stake in Citigroup Inc. after the bank raised $17 billion by selling shares at a price below what the government paid. Citigroup sold 5.4 billion shares at $3.15 apiece, less than the $3.25 the government paid when it acquired a one-third stake in the New York-based bank in September. The bank said Treasury won’t sell any of its shares for at least 90 days. The price was 8.7 percent below its closing price today, a bigger discount than those offered by Bank of America Corp. and Wells Fargo & Co. , which together raised more than $31 billion this month to exit the Troubled Asset Relief Program. “It’s obviously disappointing,” said Edward Najarian , an analyst at International Strategy and Investment Group in New York, who has a “hold” rating on the shares. “The whole structure of their deal to pay back TARP wasn’t very good for common shareholders and that is being reflected in the pricing.” The bank said it also raised $3.5 billion by selling “tangible equity units,” securities that make quarterly payments of 7.5 percent a year and include a requirement to buy Citigroup shares in 2012. Citigroup said earlier this week that it would sell at least $20.5 billion of equity and debt to exit TARP. After that announcement, the Treasury said it would sell as much as $5 billion of its stake, in conjunction with the bank’s secondary offering, with the rest to be sold over the next year. Shares Fall The lender’s shares fell 25 cents, or 7.2 percent, to $3.20 at 7:45 p.m. in New York. The $3.15 price is a 20 percent discount from the closing price on Dec. 11, before Citigroup announced the plan to repay TARP. “The market is dictating the terms, and the terms aren’t Favorable,” said Douglas Ciocca , who oversees almost $2 billion at Renaissance Financial Corp. in Leawood, Kansas. “You can’t say the market is wrong. The market cast its vote and they’re low down on the ballot.” The Treasury holds $25 billion in common stock in Citigroup, along with a $20 billion preferred equity stake and further preferred shares granted in connection with an asset- guarantee agreement. Bank of America, the largest U.S. lender, raised its funds on Dec. 3. The Charlotte, North Carolina-based bank sold 1.286 billion so-called common equivalent securities at $15 each, a 4.8 percent discount to its closing price that day. San Francisco-based Wells Fargo, which trumped Citigroup’s bid to buy Wachovia Corp. last year, leapfrogged its rival by completing its $12.25 billion share sale yesterday. Wells Fargo, whose largest shareholder is billionaire investor Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway Inc., made its plan public hours after Citigroup’s announcement and completed the sale the following day at a 1.9 percent discount. To contact the reporters on this story: Michael Moore in New York at mmoore55@bloomberg.net Michael Tsang in New York at mtsang1@bloomberg.net .

Read the full article →

Wells Fargo Plans to Sell $10.4 Billion of Shares to Repay U.S. Bailout

December 14, 2009

By Dakin Campbell Dec. 14 (Bloomberg) — Wells Fargo & Co. , seeking to shake the stigma of government bailout funds and keep up with its rivals, plans to raise $10.4 billion in a share sale so it can get out of the Troubled Asset Relief Program. The bank plans to return all of the $25 billion that taxpayers invested last year, according to a company statement issued today. The exit from TARP would put Wells Fargo on the same footing as Bank of America Corp. , JPMorgan Chase & Co. and Citigroup Inc., its three largest competitors, which have already paid back the U.S. or announced plans to do so. “TARP stabilized our country’s financial system when confidence in financial markets around the world was being tested unlike any other period in our history,” Wells Fargo Chief Executive Officer John Stumpf said in the statement. “We’re ready to fully repay TARP in a way that serves the interests of the U.S. taxpayer, as well as our customers, team members and investors.” The San Francisco-based bank ranks fourth by assets and deposits in the U.S. Stumpf had vowed during investor conferences this year to pay off TARP in a “shareholder- friendly” way, without elaborating on how that might be accomplished or saying whether current investors would have their stakes diluted. The biggest holder is billionaire Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway Inc. TARP began in October last year when former Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson persuaded nine of the biggest banks to sell $125 billion in preferred stock to the government to stabilize the financial system. Banks chafed under restrictions imposed by the program, which affect lending, foreclosures, pay and perks. Wells Fargo Chairman Richard Kovacevich initially said he didn’t want TARP money and later called government stress-tests tied to the program “asinine.” To contact the reporter on this story: Dakin Campbell in San Francisco at dcampbell27@bloomberg.net

Read the full article →

Eric Schurenberg: The Case for Gold is Airtight. Which is Bad for Gold.

December 3, 2009

There’s no shortage of doubt about most investments these days. (Are emerging markets in a bubble? Are Treasuries a trap for the wary?) But there is no doubt about gold. The yellow metal keeps hitting records, this morning at over $1,200 an ounce. What’s more, it’s hard to find a reason for it NOT to go higher. That’s why it’s strange that Jim Grant, one of gold’s most eloquent long-term fans , is turning lukewarm on the hot metal. This is the sort of market that should make him feel utterly vindicated. But Grant is less a true-believing gold bug than confirmed contrarian. And when any asset seems pre-ordained to go higher, Grant gets nervous. Here’s what everyone can see: Gold generally outperforms when there is a lot of doubt about the economy and financial assets. We got that. Gold tends to shine when central banks are printing a lot of paper money. They are. Gold naturally does well in dollar terms when the dollar is falling against other currencies. Check that, too. Grant raises another scenario that’s even more bullish for gold. Most central banks keep a certain portion of their foreign reserves in gold. The share of reserves in gold is much higher in developed economies than in emerging ones. In the U.S, for example, gold accounts for 77% of total official foreign exchange reserves. In China, it’s just 1.6%. But what if the emerging countries wanted to close that gap? ( India, in fact, bought 200 metric tons of gold in early November , claiming it was diversifying its reserves.) Grant quotes his colleague Ian McCulley: For a thought experiment, consider the nine foreign exchange reserve holders in the world that are currently ‘underweight’ gold …The list would include Brazil, Russian, India and China, along with a handful of wealthier Asian countries. If the nine got it into their heads to boost their gold holdings to 10% of their reserves, they would have to acquire 11,174 metric tons; to 25%, they would need 33,254 metric tons. McCulley points out that there only 150,000 tons of gold above ground in the entire world. Grant concludes dryly, “You could talk yourself into some fancy bullion prices.” So why is he lukewarm? Grant doesn’t advance any arguments not to believe in gold for the long run, except to point out one thing: This is how markets look at the top . Investors always miss turning points. He quotes the impressive logic of gold bears just 10 years ago who patiently explained that gold was a relic-this was when it was trading at $250 an ounce. This was the same era in which the British Treasury worked out a seemingly ironclad argument for why it made sense to sell gold at $275. (CBS MoneyWatch columnist Larry Swedroe makes a similar point in this post .) Unlike stocks and bonds, gold produces no income, so it’s hard to ascribe any intrinsic value to it, as, say, Warren Buffett would to a security. It is more of a barometer of anxiety about the financial system, which is high. And, like any other asset, it can trade on its own momentum. In other words, as my colleague and former gold trader Jill Schlesinger puts it in this post , gold may have reached the point where it’s going up because it’s going up. The timing of all this is anyone’s guess, of course. But what you do know for sure is that fear eventually gives way to optimism and momentum always reverses. You can count on it. Grant’s conclusion, paraphrasing Churchill: …this may not be the beginning of the end of the gold bull market. But it is certainly the end of the beginning. Put less elegantly: You can believe in the long-term case for gold, as Grant does. But you don’t have to buy the stuff at $1,200 an ounce. Continue reading on CBS MoneyWatch.com

Read the full article →

Eric Schurenberg: The Case for Gold is Airtight. Which is Bad for Gold.

December 3, 2009

There’s no shortage of doubt about most investments these days. (Are emerging markets in a bubble? Are Treasuries a trap for the wary?) But there is no doubt about gold. The yellow metal keeps hitting records, this morning at over $1,200 an ounce. What’s more, it’s hard to find a reason for it NOT to go higher. That’s why it’s strange that Jim Grant, one of gold’s most eloquent long-term fans , is turning lukewarm on the hot metal. This is the sort of market that should make him feel utterly vindicated. But Grant is less a true-believing gold bug than confirmed contrarian. And when any asset seems pre-ordained to go higher, Grant gets nervous. Here’s what everyone can see: Gold generally outperforms when there is a lot of doubt about the economy and financial assets. We got that. Gold tends to shine when central banks are printing a lot of paper money. They are. Gold naturally does well in dollar terms when the dollar is falling against other currencies. Check that, too. Grant raises another scenario that’s even more bullish for gold. Most central banks keep a certain portion of their foreign reserves in gold. The share of reserves in gold is much higher in developed economies than in emerging ones. In the U.S, for example, gold accounts for 77% of total official foreign exchange reserves. In China, it’s just 1.6%. But what if the emerging countries wanted to close that gap? ( India, in fact, bought 200 metric tons of gold in early November , claiming it was diversifying its reserves.) Grant quotes his colleague Ian McCulley: For a thought experiment, consider the nine foreign exchange reserve holders in the world that are currently ‘underweight’ gold …The list would include Brazil, Russian, India and China, along with a handful of wealthier Asian countries. If the nine got it into their heads to boost their gold holdings to 10% of their reserves, they would have to acquire 11,174 metric tons; to 25%, they would need 33,254 metric tons. McCulley points out that there only 150,000 tons of gold above ground in the entire world. Grant concludes dryly, “You could talk yourself into some fancy bullion prices.” So why is he lukewarm? Grant doesn’t advance any arguments not to believe in gold for the long run, except to point out one thing: This is how markets look at the top . Investors always miss turning points. He quotes the impressive logic of gold bears just 10 years ago who patiently explained that gold was a relic-this was when it was trading at $250 an ounce. This was the same era in which the British Treasury worked out a seemingly ironclad argument for why it made sense to sell gold at $275. (CBS MoneyWatch columnist Larry Swedroe makes a similar point in this post .) Unlike stocks and bonds, gold produces no income, so it’s hard to ascribe any intrinsic value to it, as, say, Warren Buffett would to a security. It is more of a barometer of anxiety about the financial system, which is high. And, like any other asset, it can trade on its own momentum. In other words, as my colleague and former gold trader Jill Schlesinger puts it in this post , gold may have reached the point where it’s going up because it’s going up. The timing of all this is anyone’s guess, of course. But what you do know for sure is that fear eventually gives way to optimism and momentum always reverses. You can count on it. Grant’s conclusion, paraphrasing Churchill: …this may not be the beginning of the end of the gold bull market. But it is certainly the end of the beginning. Put less elegantly: You can believe in the long-term case for gold, as Grant does. But you don’t have to buy the stuff at $1,200 an ounce. Continue reading on CBS MoneyWatch.com

Read the full article →

Goldman Sachs’s Hong Kong-Based Michael Evans Sells $12 Million of Stock

November 26, 2009

By Christine Harper Nov. 26 (Bloomberg) — Michael Evans , the Hong Kong-based vice chairman who was Goldman Sachs Group Inc. ’s highest-paid executive officer last year, sold $12 million of stock this week, according to a company filing. Evans, 52, sold 70,000 shares at prices ranging from $170.98 to $173.47 on Nov. 23 and Nov. 24, according to the filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. The filing showed he retained 714,953 shares, which are worth $121 million at today’s closing share price of $168.92. Goldman Sachs, the most profitable securities firm in Wall Street history, set a record for compensation in 2007. The company slashed pay last year and had its first quarterly loss. Chief Executive Officer Lloyd Blankfein , 55, and his six top deputies, including Evans, agreed to forgo annual bonuses. Evans, who is also chairman of Goldman Sachs’s Asia business, received total compensation last year of $5.3 million, including $1.7 million in tax equalization payments and $387,598 for international assignment benefits. Blankfein made $1.1 million in the period. Blankfein and three other executives are prohibited from selling any more than 10 percent of their stock under an agreement reached last year with billionaire investor Warren Buffett , whose Berkshire Hathaway Inc. paid $5 billion for preferred stock and warrants in Goldman Sachs. Evans is not covered by that agreement. Another senior executive not covered by the agreement is Michael Sherwood , the firm’s London-based vice chairman and co- head of the European business. Sherwood, 44, exercised options on 158,125 shares over seven days from Nov. 13 to Nov. 23, according to regulatory filings. Fund Investments The options let Sherwood purchase the stock at prices of $82.875 or $91.61, about half the current level, before selling them at prices ranging from $171.43 to $178.05, booking a profit of about $13.7 million. Still, the company’s top 10 executives received $49.6 million from their investments in hedge funds and private equity funds during 2008, more than most of them earned in compensation after agreeing to forgo bonuses. Blankfein’s $1.1 million in total compensation was dwarfed by the $11.3 million he received in profits and other income from his fund investments, a proxy filing from the company showed earlier this year. To contact the reporter on this story: Christine Harper in New York at charper@bloomberg.net .

Read the full article →

Berkshire Hathaway Venture Wins Auction for Capmark Loan Unit, Lawyer Says

November 24, 2009

By Steven Church and Andrew Frye Nov. 24 (Bloomberg) — Capmark Financial Group Inc., the bankrupt lender to office and apartment builders, agreed to sell its loan-servicing unit to Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway Inc. and Leucadia National Corp. , a lawyer for Capmark said. The partnership between Berkshire and Leucadia, called Berkadia, won an auction for the servicing unit, beating out an affiliate of PNC Financial Services Group Inc. , attorney Michael Kessler told the judge overseeing Capmark’s bankruptcy case during a hearing today in Wilmington, Delaware. Berkadia increased its offer by $25 million and converted a $75 million note to cash, adding $100 million in cash to the deal, Kessler said in court today. The total value of the deal climbed to about $468 million from $408 million, Kessler said. “Berkadia increased its bid, I believe, to get us to break off talks with PNC Bank,” Kessler told U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Christopher Sontchi , who must approve the deal before it can be completed. Sontchi is currently holding a hearing on the proposed sale. Horsham, Pennsylvania-based Capmark filed bankruptcy Oct. 25, blaming falling property values and a drop in lending. As of June 30, Capmark had $20.1 billion in assets and debts of $21 billion. The company lost $1.6 billion in April, May and June, according to court records. Buffett, who oversees businesses ranging from insurance to energy production, is investing Berkshire’s cash in assets hobbled by the property-market decline. Last year, he agreed to buy loans backing factory-built homes from CIT Group Inc. Capmark, owned by firms including KKR & Co. and Goldman Sachs Group Inc. , paid Berkadia $40 million in September for a so- called put option requiring Berkadia to buy the servicing unit unless a higher offer came in. Buffett “wants to own good businesses over a long period of time,” said Paul Howard , an analyst with Janney Montgomery Scott LLC’s Langen McAlenney division in Hartford, Connecticut. “But when the world is freaking out over commercial real estate, and they’re giving him a price far below what he thinks is the worst-case scenario, he’s going to be opportunistic.” The case is In re Capmark Financial Group Inc., 09-13684, U.S. Bankruptcy Court, District of Delaware (Wilmington). To contact the reporters on this story: Steven Church in Wilmington at schurch3@bloomberg.net ; Andrew Frye in New York at afrye@bloomberg.net .

Read the full article →

Joseph A. Palermo: Goldman Sachs’ $500 Million Mea Culpa

November 20, 2009

It’s truly touching that Goldman Sachs’ CEO Lloyd Blankfein, who recently said that his too-big-to-fail, Fed-backed holding company is doing “God’s work,” has offered a mea culpa (of sorts) for his firm’s past sins. Our beneficent overlords at Goldman Sachs promise to bestow upon small business a boon of $500 million . This generous sum is about 3 percent of the $16.7 billion that Goldman has set aside for its employees this year — a year of expected record-breaking profits on Wall Street . Goldman has also retained the services of the high-powered international PR firm, Brunswick , to make sure that all of us understand that even a vampire squid can be magnanimous. Brunswick has among its ranks the public affairs director and the chief of staff of former Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson. “Brunswick is a corporate communications partnership,” its home page states. “We provide informed advice at a senior level to businesses and other organizations around the world, helping them to address critical communications challenges that may affect their valuation, reputation or ability to achieve their ambitions.” Goldman Sachs is going to need all the PR help it can get. At this point, the company (which Jon Stewart of The Daily Show calls “Gold Man-sack”) would be far more popular among the public if it specialized in clubbing baby seals and whaling. Just wait until the lawsuits filed by six municipalities and counties against the company reveal the extent of our noble masters’ criminality. The suits claim that Goldman Sachs ripped off institutional investors, such as the Sacramento Municipal Utility District, by rigging the market for “municipal derivatives.” What’s at stake in this litigation is far more than $500 million. I’m afraid not even the good name and homespun bona fides of Warren Buffett can turn this sow’s ear into a silk purse. Goldman Sachs should probably follow Blackwater’s lead and “re-brand” itself by changing its name. Even the miracle workers at Brunswick won’t be able to sell stealing from local governments as “God’s work” to the public. There’s really no better example of Goldman Sachs’ utter contempt for the American people than its swindle in the form of stealing public funds through manipulating the municipal bond market. The AIG bailout saved Goldman billions of dollars and the Fed continues to back its risky ventures now that it is a “holding company.” This institution deserves the full force of anti-trust law deployed against it. Maybe in open court we’ll get a glimpse into the real workings of this unworthy amalgam of greed and arrogance.

Read the full article →

Buffett Taps JPMorgan, Wells Fargo for $8 Billion Loan in Burlington Deal

November 20, 2009

By Andrew Frye and Emre Peker Nov. 20 (Bloomberg) — JPMorgan Chase & Co. and Wells Fargo & Co. are arranging an $8 billion loan for Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway Inc. to help finance the takeover of railroad Burlington Northern Santa Fe Corp. The banks are providing a one-year loan with an interest rate 1 percentage point to 2 percentage points more than the London interbank offered rate, Fort Worth, Texas-based Burlington said yesterday in a regulatory filing. Three-month Libor, a borrowing benchmark, was set at 0.27 percent yesterday. Buffett is risking Berkshire’s AAA rating at Standard & Poor’s by taking on debt and drawing down cash holdings to finance the $26 billion acquisition of Burlington. New York- based JPMorgan has 22 percent of the U.S. market for syndicated loans this year, second only to Bank of America Corp. , according to Bloomberg data. San Francisco-based Wells Fargo, which counts Berkshire as its biggest shareholder, is ranked fourth. Buffett has “got to have a rolodex full of potential creditors,” said Paul Howard , an analyst with Janney Montgomery Scott LLC’s Langen McAlenney division in Hartford, Connecticut. “If he doesn’t like the terms of one, he’ll call the next one.” Berkshire, which has reported two straight quarterly profit increases, is benefiting from a decrease in its credit-default swaps since March. The decline in the swaps, which protect creditors when borrowers don’t pay, indicates that investors believe Berkshire’s creditworthiness has improved. Buffett, the second-richest American, is Berkshire’s chief executive officer. To contact the reporters on this story: Andrew Frye in New York at afrye@bloomberg.net ; Emre Peker in New York at epeker2@bloomberg.net .

Read the full article →

Gross Says China Bubble to Threaten Growth as Global Export Demand Falters

November 19, 2009

By Susanne Walker and Carol Massar Nov. 20 (Bloomberg) — Bill Gross , who runs the world’s biggest bond fund at Pacific Investment Management Co., said Chinese growth is likely to be hurt by an absence of consumer demand from trading partners such as the U.S. “The Chinese, I suspect, will have a bubble of their own to confront,” Gross said in a Bloomberg Television interview yesterday from Pimco’s headquarters in Newport Beach, California. “It’s gearing up for export that doesn’t find an end consumer, that’s the real problem in China.” The “systemic risk” of new asset bubbles in global economies and markets is rising with the Federal Reserve keeping interest rates at record lows, Gross wrote in his December investment outlook posted on Pimco’s Web site yesterday. Under what Pimco has termed the “new normal,” investors should be prepared for lower-than-average historical returns with heightened government regulation, lower consumption, slower growth and a shrinking global role for the U.S. economy. “With unemployment in the double digits and likely to stay close to that for the next six months despite job creation ahead, the Fed has nowhere to go,” Gross, co-founder and co-chief investment officer of Pimco, said on Bloomberg Television. Fed Chairman Ben S. Bernanke said after a Nov. 16 speech in New York that it’s “not obvious” that asset prices in the U.S. are out of line with underlying values after a 64 percent jump in the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index from its March low. Negative Rates Treasury three-month bill rates turned negative yesterday for the first time since financial markets froze last year on concern that the rally in higher-yielding assets has outpaced the prospects for economic growth. The two-year note yield touched 0.68 percent, the least since Dec. 19. The Fed cut its target rate for overnight lending between banks to a range of zero to 0.25 percent in December. Policy makers reiterated on Nov. 4 that they intended to keep the rate at the record low for an extended period. Fed Bank of St. Louis President James Bullard said on Nov. 18 that experience indicates policy makers may not start to increase interest rates until early 2012. The “heavy lifting” will likely be done first by other central banks such as those in Australia and Norway that have already begun to increase interest rates, Gross wrote. “China may abandon its dollar peg within six months’ time and with it, its own easy monetary policy that has fostered more significant mini-bubbles of lending and asset appreciation on the Chinese mainland,” he added. China’s Currency China has kept its currency at about 6.83 per dollar since July 2008 to help sustain exports amid a global economic slump. China’s trade surplus in October almost doubled from the previous month, to $24 billion. The nation, with the world’s largest foreign-exchange reserves of $2.3 trillion, is the biggest creditor to the U.S., holding $798.9 billion of Treasuries as of September. “With renewed upward appreciation of the yuan may come potentially volatile global asset price reactions to the downside — higher Treasury yields, and lower stock prices — which the Fed must surely be leery of before making any upward move, of its own,” Gross wrote. The U.S. economy grew in the third quarter for the first time in more than a year as gross domestic product increased 3.5 percent from July through September after shrinking the previous four quarters, a Commerce Department report showed on Oct. 29. Gross advised following the lead of billionaire investor Warren Buffett on buying utilities because their earnings growth will mimic U.S. economic growth and provide steady dividend income. Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway Inc. agreed this month to take over Burlington Northern Santa Fe Corp., the No. 1 U.S. railroad, for $26 billion. Fund Returns The Total Return Fund managed by Gross boosted its investment in Treasuries, so-called agency debt and other government-linked bonds to 48 percent of assets in September from 44 percent in August, according to Pimco’s Web site . The holdings were the most since August 2004. The $192.56 billion Total Return Fund yielded 18.29 percent in the past year, beating 54 percent of its peers, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. The one-month return is 1.11 percent, outpacing 59 percent of its competitors. Pimco is a unit of Munich-based insurer Allianz SE. To contact the reporter on this story: Susanne Walker in New York at swalker33@bloomberg.net .

Read the full article →

Arianna Huffington: Memo to Warren Buffett: Put Down the Pom-Poms and Tell Us the Truth About the Economy

November 16, 2009

Difficult times need wise men to tell difficult truths. And, for many years, Warren Buffett, the “Sage of Omaha,” has done just that. For example, he was one of the first to sound the alarm about the danger of derivatives, warning in 2003 that they were “financial weapons of mass destruction” that could lead to a “corporate meltdown.” So it was deeply distressing to watch his recent CNBC town hall meeting with a group of Columbia business students, followed the next night by an hour spent talking about the economy with Charlie Rose, and see Buffett joining in the economic victory lap the Obama administration — and much of the media — are taking. “The financial panic is behind us,” Buffett told the Columbia crowd. Sure, he conceded, the economy “still is sputtering some,” but his tone was overwhelmingly upbeat. The cheerleading continued with Rose: The economy “will come back, Charlie,” said Buffett. “I want to emphasize that.” And he did, again and again: “The American economy will come back.” “Businesses will be formed. Businesses will expand.” “We’re not out of the hospital yet. But we will come out of the hospital… It happened in the 19th century, it happened in the 20th century at various times, and we’ve always come back stronger.” “There will be some lasting impacts of certain types, but in terms of coming out of it, I don’t worry.” All this pom-pom shaking would have been okay if it had been accompanied by some ideas — any ideas — for what steps need to be taken for “the American economy to come back.” The assumption being that it would, somehow, just happen. That the rising tide of unemployment, foreclosures, and bankruptcies drowning so many Americans would, somehow, reverse itself. But the bout of truth-telling we so desperately need was absent. Instead, Buffett assured Rose “we’ll create new jobs” because… well, because we always have. As proof, he pointed to the early 80s recession when unemployment was at 10 percent and people were deeply concerned about America’s economic future. “We’ve created millions and millions and millions of jobs since then,” he said. “But, you know, who would have thought when Paul Allen and Bill Gates were in Albuquerque, you know, eating pizza and drinking Coke at 2:00 in the morning, you know, that they were a big part of our future.” This echoed his rah-rah salute to American can-do at Columbia: “The plants haven’t gone away. The cornfields haven’t gone away. The talent of the American people hasn’t gone away.” But all those same things could have been said last October, when Wall Street was melting down. The plants hadn’t gone away then, either. The cornfields hadn’t gone away. The talent of the American people hadn’t gone away. But since it was the banks in crisis, we didn’t just offer pep talks and rosy predictions for the future, we convened all night meetings, and brought together big wigs over a weekend and told them not to leave without a solution. And, oh yeah, we ponied up trillions of our taxpayer dollars. But even with unemployment at a 26-year high of 10.2 percent (which is actually 17.5 percent when you include workers no longer looking for work or only partially employed), we’re not seeing anything remotely resembling the urgency and aggressive action we saw when it was the banks that needed saving. Instead of Buffett raising his prophetic voice to sound the alarm as he’d done in the past, and as we desperately need him to do again, he’s sounding a trumpet blast: “behold and rejoice.” And the best the White House can muster is a summit on joblessness — to be held next month. What’s the rush, right? The plants are still there — and so are the cornfields. Despite Buffett’s acknowledgment that “we’ve got 60 million people living in households where the top income is $21,000 or less,” it looks as if, at least for the moment, he’s out of the truth telling business. Last night, an investment banker friend told me “Buffett is talking his book” — Wall Street-speak for making an argument that, if accepted by the market, would also make you money. I actually think it’s more likely that Buffett who, after all, has already pledged his fortune to the Gates Foundation for charity, believes that by talking the economy up he can actually have a tangible impact. But the real economy doesn’t need upbeat rhetoric. It needs serious action. For a snapshot of what kind of action, check out Nouriel Roubini’s latest post . It’s a dose of bracing truth-telling — and the perfect counterweight to Buffett’s cheerleading. Roubini puts forth more truth in 549 words than Buffett managed in a full hour on Charlie Rose and a full hour at the Columbia town hall. “There’s really just one hope for our leaders to turn things around,” writes Roubini, “a bold prescription that increases the fiscal stimulus with another round of labor-intensive, shovel-ready infrastructure projects, helps fiscally strapped state and local governments and provides a temporary tax credit to the private sector to hire more workers.” Without such action, says Roubini, “we can expect weak recovery of consumption and economic growth; larger budget deficits; greater delinquencies in residential and commercial real estate and greater fall in home and commercial real estate prices; greater losses for banks and financial institutions on residential and commercial real estate mortgages, and in credit cards, auto loans and student loans and thus a greater rate of failures of banks; and greater protectionist pressures.” The Wall Street economy and the Real Economy both went down together. But the one that caused the plunge has gotten the lion’s share of government attention and money — while the other one has continued to plummet. And since it’s tragically clear which economy has Larry Summers’ and Tim Geithner’s attention, we are in even more urgent need of truth tellers to point out the grave human consequences of the White House’s lackadaisical response. Consequences like the 35.8 people million who used food stamps in July — up almost 7 million from the same time last year. Or the 17 million American households that have had difficulty putting enough food on the table during the last year — an increase of 4 million from last year. Or the 1.3 million unemployed female heads of household who, according to the Center for American Progress, are unemployed . Or the 42-percent rise in homeless schoolchildren in Las Vegas — the result of Nevada’s highest-in-the-country foreclosure rate. I’d love to go to Vegas with Warren Buffett — but not to hit the tables or catch a show. I want to take him to Whitney Elementary School, which I saw profiled on Saturday on CNN, right after watching Buffett on my Tivo’d Charlie Rose. As reported by CNN correspondent Dan Simon, the school’s supply closets are no longer filled with pens or paper, but with food and clothing: “This school has so many homeless people that it felt it had to take the initiative to make sure that its students are fed and have clothes on their back.” I’m sure, given Buffett’s legendary compassion, that what would happen in Vegas would most definitely not stay in Vegas — but would instead become a much-needed counter-narrative to the official spin. The media spotlight needs to move off Wall Street and the green shoots sprouting across the Dow’s ticker and onto ways to turn the real economy around. It’s not going to happen by clicking our heels together three times and saying “The American economy will come back… The American economy will come back… The American economy will come back.” We need Warren Buffett to put down his pom-poms and tell the president — and the American people — the truth about the economy.

Read the full article →

Buffett Says Burlington Railroad an Asset for a Century, `Not a Bargain’

November 14, 2009

By Andrew Frye Nov. 14 (Bloomberg) — Berkshire Hathaway Inc. ’s Warren Buffett , who agreed to buy Burlington Northern Santa Fe Corp. in his biggest takeover, said the railroad’s results in the next 100 years will justify a $26 billion bid that’s “not a bargain.” “It’s a good asset for Berkshire to own over the next century,” Buffett said in an interview with Charlie Rose to be broadcast yesterday on PBS. “You don’t get bargains on things like that. It’s not cheap.” Buffett is borrowing about $8 billion and risking Berkshire’s AAA credit rating at Standard & Poor’s to buy the railroad in what he calls an “all-in wager” on the future of the country’s economy. The stock-and-cash bid, announced on Nov. 3, values Fort Worth, Texas-based Burlington at $100 a share, 31 percent more than its closing price the day before. “It was an opportunity to buy a business that’s going to be around for 100 or 200 years that’s interwoven with the American economy in a way that, if the American economy prospers, the business will prosper,” Buffett said. Buffett is investing Omaha, Nebraska-based Berkshire’s $26.9 billion cash as the U.S. shows signs of pulling out of recession. The U.S. economy returned to growth in the third quarter, expanding at a 3.5 percent pace, according to the Commerce Department. Goldman, General Electric Last year, as stocks plunged and credit markets froze, Buffett extended financing to firms including Goldman Sachs Group Inc. and General Electric Co. , and he agreed to buy Constellation Energy Group Inc. The Constellation deal was scuttled after a competing bid from Electricite de France SA trumped Berkshire. Buffett agreed to pay 18.2 times Burlington’ estimated 2010 earnings of $5.51 a share, according to the average analyst projection in a Bloomberg survey before the deal was announced. That compares with the 13.4 multiple for the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index as of Nov. 2. “The company wasn’t egregiously cheap,” said Guy Spier , a principal at hedge fund Aquamarine Funds LLC , which owns Berkshire shares. “It could be five years before the logic of Burlington Northern” becomes clear, he said. Buffett, the second-richest American, built Berkshire by buying out-of-favor stocks and acquiring companies with what he says are enduring advantages over competitors. Berkshire, with units that sell insurance, energy, ice cream and underwear, posted two straight profit gains after its worst loss in at least 20 years in the first quarter. ‘Good Investment’ Buffett said he had “already sold” Berkshire’s stakes in Burlington’s competitors. His company owned about 9.56 million shares of Union Pacific Corp. and 1.93 million shares of Norfolk Southern Corp. as of June 30, according to a regulatory filing. “I’ve done that just to facilitate the transaction,” Buffett said. “I think they are good investments. I would have held them had this hadn’t happened.” Buffett said he also has a toy railroad set in his attic, adding “I hope they don’t make me sell it for antitrust reasons.” The interview will be rebroadcast on Bloomberg Television on Nov. 16. To contact the reporter on this story: Andrew Frye in New York at afrye@bloomberg.net .

Read the full article →

Warren Buffet Tells Columbia Business Students: "The Financial Panic Is Over" (VIDEO)

November 13, 2009

Warren Buffett and Bill Gates spoke to a group of Columbia students on Thursday for a CNBC town hall and question-and-answer session. The business giants discussed topics ranging from capitalism and the state of the economy to Goldman Sachs, Apple, and Google, and they were decidedly positive in their outlooks. When asked whether at any point over the last year they’d doubted capitalism and the American “way of life,” both expressed confidence in the system. “This country works,” Buffett told the audience. “We have two hundred years of proof, and it’s going to continue to work.” Gates said the United States is still a great place for innovation and science, and he said that while he expected that “we’re going to tune our system of capitalism,” overall the structure of the American free market system is strong: “There are definitely some lessons, but the fundamentals of the system, a marketplace driven system where we invest in education, in a great infrastructure for the long term, that’s continued.” Buffett conceded that the “economy was sputtering, still is sputtering some,” but he indicated that there is great opportunity for growth within the country, and counseled investors to look inward before going overseas. He also addressed the challenge of regulatory reform: “Going forward, it’s a very tricky thing to figure out how to present excessive leverage, how to prevent off balance sheet arrangements from getting in trouble, or for just having people at the top of major institutions that run risks that they shouldn’t be running. We’re wrestling with that right now.” The students applauded and clapped in unanimity after each of Buffett’s punch lines- all variations on: “Right now, I would pay $100,000 for 10 percent of the future earnings of any of you. So, if anyone wants to see me after this is over …” WATCH: Get HuffPost Business On Facebook and Twitter !

Read the full article →