water

Huffington Post…

BUTTE LA ROSE, LA. –- The evening chorus of bullfrogs, crickets and screech owls along the waterfront has seemed louder these last few nights. The homes are empty. The music and chatter from neighbors has disappeared. The electricity is almost entirely switched off, plunging the remaining holdouts of this hideaway community into pitch-black nights illuminated only by the moon and stars. In the heart of the nation’s largest swamp, Butte La Rose lies in the direct path of floodwaters unleashed last Saturday from the Morganza Floodway, an effort to divert the Mississippi River’s force away from Baton Rouge and New Orleans. But before the water rises here, it must spread out over hundreds of square miles of cypress swamps and bottomlands. The people of Louisiana have become attuned to disasters over the years, yet the slow creep of rising water through this untamed region has even the hardiest natives on edge. “Growing up down here, you become acclimated to hurricanes. It’s fast-moving,” said full-time resident Michelle McInnis, a native of Hackberry, La., a town walloped by Hurricane Rita more than five years ago. “It’s mentally anguishing, this slow rise of the water … and knowing you can’t come back for six weeks.” A surprising number of full-time residents live in this Atchafalaya Basin town, a collection of both dowdy trailer homes and million-dollar fishing retreats with names like “Bar-B-Que and Drink a Few” and “Dad’s Pad When Mom’s Mad.” There are two ways in to Butte La Rose: a ramp down from Interstate 10 and a floating bridge. By Saturday, the bridge will be off limits, leaving only entrance. The handful of stores and bars close one by one. Local sheriff deputies Army National Guard Humvees constantly patrol the area, making daily rounds to warn anyone left that a mandatory evacuation remains in effect. The daily checkups have become a sort of joke for Randy Moncrief. He’s vowed to watch over “Timbuktu,” the two-story red waterfront home owned by his father, until he either runs out of food or can no longer tolerate bathing in the canal behind the house. “Cleanliness is gonna drive me out, if anything,” Moncrief said. “I’ve got plenty of shotguns. I’ll kill me a rabbit, a gator, a deer, whatever.” Before it comes to that, Moncrief has stocked up freezers and coolers with nearly ten pounds of red beans and rice with sausage, a full frozen brisket, 20 pounds of shrimp and loads of deer sausage. He’s not sure exactly what he’ll do for the next three or four weeks. “It’ll be some long days,” he admitted. His truck is gone, left on higher ground. He has a four-wheeler to traverse high water, if needed. Randy Moncrief on his porch Moncrief is a product of the Atchafalaya Basin, a wild region of swamplands and marshes west of the Mississippi River. His grandparents trapped nutria and muskrat for years at a “camp” in the middle of the swamp, accessible only by shallow-draft boats. He said he’s used to being surrounded by water. But in recent days, nature has started to rear its head. Snakes appear in greater abundance, along with alligators. Moncrief was tending to a plant in the backyard three days ago when a snake bit his hand. Shining a flashlight on the canal behind his house at night reveals numerous pairs of red alligator eyes lurking in the waters. Moncrief is one of only a handful of people in Butte La Rose planning to ride out the flood. Most escaped in a frenzy last weekend when the Army Corps of Engineers opened the floodway at Morganza. Last Saturday and Sunday, the two-lane road leading out of town was backed up for hours, jammed with a long procession of trucks and trailers hauling everything out. Some hired contractors at the last minute to jack up their houses, an attempt to buy another few feet. Many left signs tacked to their homes, staking out their territory. One read, “Nothing left worth stealing.” The mood this week has been much calmer. McInnis and her boyfriend have been packing up their belongings slowly. She marks the calendar each morning with the new flood heights. It began May 3 at 15.5; the water now sits at 20.94. Within a week it’s expected to rise another five feet. On Friday, the couple headed out of town to stay with relatives. They shut the power off behind them, not knowing when they would return. “You have to respect Mother Nature 100 percent,” McInnis said. “You can’t think that you’re going to go against her and win. Because you will not.”

Read the original post:
In Flood’s Crosshairs, A Community Waits

Find our Weekly Commercial Real Estate, Private Equity and Fund Newsletters at www.WeeklyBrief.net

{ 0 comments }

Here is a good post from %sourceexcerpt%

Continue here: Bob Carpenter Joins ERM Southern Division

Industry-News.org finds the best stories around the globe and distributes them to our readers. Most articles are published by third parties and these links will take you to other websites. In some cases, websites require their own registration to read their stories.

The headlines are provided as a service to readers. All rights reserved by source. We provide special newsletters on Distressed Debt and Loan Sales News, Distressed Multifamily Real Estate, Distressed Commercial Real Estate, Distressed Funds, Jobs & Employment Newsletter, Fundraising Newsletter, Deals Newsletter, Institutional News, Bankrupsky News, Distressed Housing and Condomimun News, Distressed Legal News, Hedge Fund Conferences Newsletters, Real Estate Conferences Newsletter

Other Partner & Related Sites:

Institutional Partners Jobs www.InstitutionalPartners.com: Real Estate Jobs, Private Equity Jobs, Hedge Fund Jobs

Distressed Marketplace www.DistressedMarketplace.com: Distressed Loans, Distressed Funds, Distressed Real Estate, Distressed Companies: Distressed Distressed Asset Coalition (DAC) www.DistressedCoalition.com: Debt, Distressed Real Estate, REO, Foreclosures, Distressed Funds, Distressed Loan Sales;

Distressed Events: www.Distressed-Events.com distressed-conferences, distressed webinars, distressed classes, distressed debt information, distressed real estate

Certified Courses: www.Certified-Courses.com: Leading e-learning classes on Real Estate, private Equity, Hedge Funds

Global Financial Radio www.GlobalFinancialRadio.com: Industry news for commercial real estate, distressed debt, private equity firms, hedge funds

If you want to add a news site, remove a site, or partner with us, email newspartners@industry-partners.org

www.Industry-Partners.org We Find The News For You!

Find our Weekly Commercial Real Estate, Private Equity and Fund Newsletters at www.WeeklyBrief.net

{ 0 comments }

Video: Virgin Green’s Coppel Sees Opportunity in Water Industry

May 3, 2011

May 3 (Bloomberg) — Toby Coppel, a partner of Virgin Green Fund and previously chief strategy officer and managing director, Yahoo! Europe & Canada, spoke yesterday about his investment strategy and opportunities in the water industry. He talked with Cory Johnson on Bloomberg Television’s “Bloomberg West.” (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Allen Matkins Elects David Osias as New Managing Partner

March 17, 2011

Bankruptcy and Water Rights Attorney Succeeds Brian Leck as Leader

Read the full article →

BP, ARCO Sued For Alleged Water Contamination From Toxic Mine

February 16, 2011

RENO, Nev. — Neighbors of a toxic mine in northern Nevada have filed a class-action lawsuit against BP America and Atlantic Richfield Co. accusing them of intentionally and negligently concealing the extent of the contamination leaking off the abandoned site for decades. The suit filed in U.S. District Court in Reno on Monday seeks a minimum of $5 million on behalf of at least 100 residents in the rural town of Yerington where the old Anaconda copper mine opened in 1941. The plaintiffs say the wells they once used for drinking water are polluted with uranium, arsenic and other metals in a plume of groundwater that slowly has migrated off of the site that covers 6-square miles – an area equal to the size of about 3,000 football fields – about 65 miles southeast of Reno. The lawsuit says that even after whistleblowers started to publicize previously secret records documenting the dangers, the corporations refused to cooperate with state and federal regulators trying to clean up the radioactive and other hazardous waste the past 10 years. “They destroyed the water supply to this community and now it’s time to clean it up. It’s time to get the contamination off these people’s land and out of their wells,” said Steven German, one of the lawyers who filed the lawsuit on behalf of the residents. “A mother should not have to tell her child they can’t turn on the spigot because their water is dangerous. That is not acceptable in this country,” he told The Associated Press on Tuesday. The lawsuit said the companies knew or should have known that their discharge of toxic and hazardous materials would pollute neighboring properties, air, water, groundwater and the surrounding environment. It said they have `intentionally allowed toxic and hazardous substances to enter and remain on” the neighbors’ land. “Despite their knowledge of the serious health and environmental effects associated with exposure to toxic and hazardous substances and despite orders and warnings form health and environmental regulators, (BP and ARCO) intentionally masked the true extent of the contamination, thereby enabling (them) to avoid taking all appropriate steps to properly remediate the toxic and hazardous substances or to mitigate the dangers created by their release, discharge, storage, handling, processing, disposal of and dumping of toxic and hazardous substances,” the suit said. Tom Mueller, a spokesman for BP America, said Tuesday evening that company officials have not had a chance to review the lawsuit and had no immediate comment. Fueled by demand after World War II, Anaconda produced nearly 1.75 billion pounds of copper from 1952-78 at the mine that runs along U.S. Highway 95 in the Mason Valley, an irrigated agricultural oasis in the area’s otherwise largely barren high desert. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has determined over the years that uranium was produced as a byproduct of processing the copper and that the radioactive waste was initially dumped into dirt-bottomed ponds that – unlike modern lined ponds – leaked into the groundwater. Officials for BP and its subsidiary Atlantic Richfield, which bought Anaconda Copper Co. in 1978, have provided bottled water for free to any residents who want it over the past few years. But they have insisted that uranium naturally occurs in the region’s soil and, until recently, they argued there was no way to prove that a half-century of processing metals there was responsible for the contamination. However, a new wave of EPA testing first reported by The Associated Press in November 2009 found that 79 percent of the wells tested north of mine have dangerous levels of uranium or arsenic or both that make the water unsafe to drink. “You now have evidence of mine-impacted groundwater,” Steve Acree, a highly regarded hydrogeologist for the EPA in Oklahoma brought in to examine the test results, told AP at the time. One monitoring well a half mile away had levels of uranium more than 10 times the legal drinking water standard. At the mine itself, wells tested as high as 100 times the standard in an area where ore was processed with sulfuric acid and other toxic chemicals in unlined ponds. Though the health effects of specific levels are not well understood, the EPA says long-term exposure to high levels of uranium in drinking water may cause cancer and damage kidneys.

Read the full article →

Obama’s Big Budget Cut Proposals Target The Poor

February 10, 2011

WASHINGTON — As Democrats and Republicans wrangle over fiscal austerity and the shape of the 2012 federal budget, the White House is targeting programs in the $4 trillion budget that benefit low-income Americans. It’s a sop to moderates and conservatives, and it’s likely to infuriate voters who put President Barack Obama in the White House. In the past week, the Obama administration has signaled that it will propose significant cuts to community service block grants and an energy assistance program that helps poor people stay warm in the winter and cool in the summer. A White House source familiar with the budget process told HuffPost that the president will propose cutting $2.5 billion from the Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program , or LIHEAP, which received $5.1 billion in federal funds in 2009. That program distributes money to states, which then distribute it to social service agencies to help families heat or cool their homes. The National Energy Assistance Directors’ Association , a group that represents state aid officials in Washington, said Wednesday that the bad economy has forced more low-income households to rely on LIHEAP. About 8.3 million households used it in fiscal 2010, up from 7.7 million and 5.8 million during the previous two years, and the association expects eligible applications to rise to 8.9 million this year. NEADA director Mark Wolfe told HuffPost that the administration’s proposal would cut off 3.5 million households. “It’s just a cruel proposal,” Wolfe said. “What this would do is take some of the most vulnerable families in the country off energy assistance.” HuffPost readers: Used LIHEAP to heat your home? Tell us about it — email arthur@huffingtonpost.com . Wolfe said he assumed the White House had “drawn a circle” around education-aid programs like Pell Grants and Head Start. “My guess is that the administration sees a course of programs they want to protect,” he said. “But why offer this up before the Republicans suggest cuts. Why volunteer us? Why volunteer LIHEAP?” The White House declined to address these concerns on the record, though a source noted that energy prices are lower now than when Congress increased LIHEAP funding for 2009. Although energy prices have indeed declined since then, Bob Greenstein, the director of the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, a progressive think tank, pointed out that the overall economy hasn’t improved much since then. Price drops don’t offer much relief to people still looking for jobs. “The unemployment rate is higher and there are lot more people that have low incomes today than during fiscal 2008 when this was written,” Greenstein said. “I’m certainly surprised and disappointed at this cut.” And this isn’t the only program for low-income people that the White House has put on the chopping block, at a time when the administration and Congress chose to extend tax cuts for upper income and wealthy Americans. Community service block grants, which fund community organizers in poor neighborhoods, are also facing cuts. During the 2008 campaign, Obama emphasized that his own resume included a stint as a community organizer. White House budget director Jacob Lew said in a New York Times op-ed Sunday that Obama would propose cleaving block-grant allocations to $350 million from $700 million. “These are grassroots groups working in poor communities, dedicated to empowering those living there and helping them with some of life’s basic necessities,” Lew wrote. “These are the kinds of programs that President Obama worked with when he was a community organizer, so this cut is not easy for him.” David Bradley, director of the National Community Action Foundation, that works with Congress and local governments on behalf of programs for low-income people, said he was surprised that the president, a former community organizer, would go after programs that represent such a tiny part of the massive federal budget. “The question is why? Why pick on this program? It makes a statement, particularly when you’re able to say, ‘Here’s a program I really care about,’” Bradley said. “Once the Obama administration throws a poverty program in the water, it starts a feeding frenzy.” Bradley said the the White House has thrown chum into the waters swirling around the budget-cut debate. He said the Obama administration’s move simply emboldened Republicans to propose even deeper cuts to the same programs. In the wake of the White House proposal, Republicans said yesterday that they would seek $405 million in cuts to community service block grants as part of their proposed continuing resolution , a stopgap budget measure that would fund the federal government for the rest of the year. Even before word of the block grant and LIHEAP cuts, the National Law Center on Homelessness and Poverty worried that the White House will abandon a waning homeless prevention program created by the stimulus bill. The White House has also stepped on other programs for poor folks. In August, it pushed Congress to pass a child-nutrition bill — a priority of the First Lady’s — that was paid for in part with cuts to future funding for the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, better known as “food stamps.” At the time, the Food Research and Action Center, a national anti-hunger organization that lobbies on behalf of food stamps and other programs, estimated that a family of four will receive $59 less per month starting in November 2013 as a result of the $2.2-billion cut, which came on the heels of another $11.9-billion cut to food stamps that was folded into a state-aid bill. More than 100 House Democrats protested and promised to block the child nutrition bill because of the cuts, but the White House persuaded them to fall in line. With mounting evidence that the White House is willing to sacrifice low-income assistance as it jockeys for position in budget and election battles, it may be hard this time around to convince congressional Democrats to support the proposed block grant or LIHEAP cuts. The 11 Democratic members of Congress from Massachusetts sent Obama a letter on Monday opposing cuts to the block grants. And one prominent Democrat has already voiced his displeasure with the LIHEAP proposal. “I understand that difficult cuts have to be made,” Sen. John Kerry (D-Mass.) wrote in a letter to the White House on Wednesday. “But in the middle of a brutal, even historic, New England winter, home heating assistance is more critical than ever to the health and welfare of millions of Americans, especially senior citizens. I request that the administration preserve LIHEAP funding at least to the Fiscal Year 2010 funding at $5.1 billion when it submits its FY12 budget proposal to Congress.” In Massachusetts, eligible applications to LIHEAP increased 21.1 percent in 2009, and that represents a population of voters likely to be as disgruntled about the White House’s proposal as Kerry.

Read the full article →

Susan Buchanan: Private Seafood Tests Uncover Toxins Missed By Feds

February 9, 2011

Consumers used to worry about ordering seafood fried, instead of the healthier broiled-or-stewed option, but since the BP spill they’re unsure about whether to eat it at all. Independent testing by environmental groups and individuals has accelerated since last April, and they’ve found toxins — from oil, dispersants and other sources–in the local catch. Government agencies, meanwhile, say seafood from reopened, Gulf fishing areas is safe to eat. The upshot for consumers is that when buying fish, ask questions and listen to any information that comes your way. Peter Brabeck, environmental monitor at the nonprofit Louisiana Bucket Brigade, said last week, “we received test results a week ago from samples of oysters collected in Terrebonne Bay and Grand Bayou Felicity in Lafourche Parish.” Those samples were tested by a Wisconsin lab run by Pace Analytical Services, which also has a sediment-and-water lab in St. Rose, La. The Bucket Brigade sent three, separate samples to Wisconsin, where they were chemically tested in batches of 7 to 9 oysters each. “To my horror, the results showed extremely elevated levels of cadmium — which is associated with oil from the BP spill,” Brabeck said. The cadmium detected was 150 to 200 times what’s considered safe for human consumption by the Environmental Protection Agency’s carcinogenicity ‘RfD’ or oral reference doses for food, he said. When asked about reference doses, a U.S. EPA spokesman in Washington, said “information can be found at the RfD table on our Integrated Risk Information System web page for cadmium.” The agency’s RfD for human studies involving chronic, cadmium exposure is 1E-3 mg/kg/day for food. “The E in those numbers refers to exponents in scientific notation,” he said. Health information is posted on the agency’s IRIS, based on reviews of chronic, toxicity data by EPA scientists. Brabeck said “the reason we had oysters tested for cadmium is that it’s a carcinogen that can linger in the body for 20 to 30 years, and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and the Food and Drug Administration labs don’t test for it.” Manufacturing facilities might have been the source of the cadmium, he said, but added “since these oysters came from a heavily oiled area, I would lean toward them being contaminated from BP’s finest.” He continued, “Now we’re waiting for lab results to come back on samples of oysters, shrimp, crabs and snails collected in Barataria Bay and Terrebonne Bay.” Brabeck visits the coast frequently and ventures into the water. “A week and a half ago in Barataria Bay, the area where I was collecting samples had visible oil sheen, along with weathered mats of oil — that were over an inch thick in places — covering the marshes,” he said. “Yet these areas were open for fishing, and shrimping boats were in the very same water.” Testing by other environmental groups has yielded worrisome results. Paul Orr, whose title is “River-keeper” at Lower Mississippi River-keeper in Baton Rouge, said his organization — along with its parent Louisiana Environmental Action Network — began collecting seafood samples from the coast in early August to analyze the spill’s impacts. Oysters, crabs and fin fish were gathered from twenty locations between the western edge of Terrebonne Parish and the Louisiana-Mississippi border. They were tested for total petroleum hydrocarbons or TPHs and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons or PAHs. Testing was done by two, commercial-lab companies, using EPA-recognized protocols, Orr said. “All of the seafood organisms that we collected came back with TPH levels that were of concern to us, and a number of them were very, very high,” Orr said. “As far as we can determine after talking with researchers and a toxicologist, there should be no detectable levels of TPH in seafood. We also found some high levels of total PAH’s.” Orr continued, saying “some of the organisms we tested came from waters that were open for fishing, and the samples all looked beautiful. They smelled good, and there was nothing that made me think that they might be contaminated with oil.” Orr doubted anything would be found in the first oyster samples that the group sent for testing. “But they came back from the lab containing 9,780 mg/kg of total petroleum hydrocarbons, which was a bit alarming. Since then, we’ve sampled from the western edge of Terrebonne Parish to the Louisiana-Mississippi line, and the results we got back suggest to me that the government’s ‘all clear’ was sounded far too soon.” Last October, Nancy “Mac” MacKenzie from NOLA Emergency Response bought two pounds of shrimp from a Venice, La. dock and sent the digestive tracts, along with some stock that she prepared from the heads and shells, to Analytical Chemical Testing Lab, Inc. in Alabama. She said “I’m a teacher, not a scientist, but I’m also a cook and wanted to know what was in the the shrimp after the spill.” She continued, saying “after making the stock, I threw away the turkey baster I used to transfer my stock from the pot to specimen jars, because it had orange, oily spots on it that I couldn’t get out–even by soaking it with boiling water.” Her lab-test results showed “oil and grease” in the shrimps’ digestive tracts in amounts of 193 parts per million. After a series of phone calls to the FDA, the Unified Command in response to the Deepwater spill, NOAA, EPA and poison experts, she learned that her test results were many times above safe consumption levels. But she also found out that “there’s no ‘acceptable level’ for oil in general.” She said that since various oils are composed of different concentrations of chemicals, metals and compounds, the government calculates safe consumption levels based on components, like benzene and toulene. Meanwhile, the report on MacKenzie’s shrimp stock showed “PAH’s that were below the lab’s minimum level of detection,” which, she said, didn’t ensure it was safe to eat. MacKenzie received a response from a U.S. Coast Guard public affairs officer late last year, saying that analytical methods for oil and grease can’t distinguish between petroleum oils and other fatty materials, including fats that occur in shrimp. She remains upset by the runaround that she got from federal agencies, and said that seafood information presented on their websites can be difficult to understand. She also said that paying for private testing is expensive. Robert Naman, president of Analytical Chemical Testing Lab, Inc. in Mobile, Alabama, said that without seeing the test results from the Louisiana Bucket Brigade samples, it’s possible that cadmium found in local oysters is from soil contaminated by manufacturing plants. Nonetheless, he said, “large and small labs in Louisiana and across the Gulf are finding elevated PAHs, associated with the spill, in seafood.” He also said “current FDA protocol allows much higher concentrations of Petroleum Hydrocarbons in seafood sold to consumers than the government allowed after the Exxon Valdez spill” in 1989. “Many individuals have come to us to have seafood, water and tarballs tested since the spill,” Naman said. His firm, for example, tested water in a fish pond on an Alabama property half a mile from the beach. The fresh water fish had died, and the pond water tested positive for dispersants. The owner drained, refilled and restocked the pond, and the second batch of fish died. “We also found dispersant in swimming pools near the coast,” Naman, a chemist, said. “We suspect dispersants were sprayed on the coastline though that’s illegal for the most part.” The U.S. Coast Guard and the EPA authorize dispersant use. Naman said “tarballs we tested recently were 7% oil, and the rest was COREXIT dispersant and watery goop. A thick sludge containing petroleum and dispersant covers part of the Gulf ocean floor that could be seen in government, satellite photos if they wanted to show them to us.” Meanwhile, Washington agencies say Gulf seafood is safe to eat. Christine Patrick, NOAA spokeswoman, said “under government protocol to reopen fishing areas, waters must be free from oil, and every seafood sample taken from an area must pass a sensory and a chemical test.” Since the spill, four phases of sampling and testing have occurred in fishing areas, and they are characterized as baseline, boundary-surveillance, reopening and post-opening stages by NOAA. Boundary surveillance was the sampling done to make sure that all tainted fish were included inside a specific area, Patrick said. During the four phases, NOAA vessels have collected samples at sea and delivered them to the agency’s Pascagoula, Miss. seafood lab for analysis. Samples continue to be taken from docks and processing plants. “NOAA is conducting post-opening sampling now to support consumer confidence that fish in open areas of the Gulf are testing clean,” Patrick said. Since late April of last year, about 10,000 seafood samples have been collected and tested by the government, she said. “Post-opening samples number about a thousand to date, and all have passed sensory and chemical analysis.” As sampling continues in the Gulf, the only remaining federal area that’s closed to fishing is near BP’s wellhead. “All Gulf samples, state or federal, go to the National Seafood Inspection Laboratory within NOAA’s Pascagoula facility, where they’re dissected, with tissues put into sterile jars for analysis,” Patrick said. Samples are examined by a Pascagoula sensory panel — made up of NOAA and FDA experts. “During the reopening phase, it’s a seven-person panel of more than seven, rotating experts, and during the post-opening phase, it’s a panel of three,” she said. The lab’s staff of over a hundred includes scientists and technicians. Sensory testing is a longstanding method used in the food industry, and it is a science, Patrick said. “Reopening protocol calls for 21 tests on raw and cooked seafood for taste and smell, and in order for a sample to pass, five of seven panelists must pass it.” Chemical testing, including dispersant testing, for samples taken from federal waters is done at NOAA’s lab in Seattle, while state samples are chemically tested by FDA labs elsewhere. NOAA and the FDA developed a chemical test, announced in late October, to detect dispersant in fish tissues. “However, none of the thousands of fish tested in Seattle and elsewhere showed dispersant residue at levels harmful to humans, and over 99% of the over 4,000 samples tested so far had no detectable residue at all,” Patrick said. NOAA on Feb. 2 reopened 4,200 square miles that were closed to fishing after a royal red shrimper’s net yielded tarballs last October. When asked about the reopening, Brabeck of the Louisiana Bucket Brigade said “NOAA and FDA continue to make decisions affecting consumers based on too few samples, not sampling for all the toxins, not testing for all the metals and not listening to what scientists, fishermen and nonprofit groups are saying. They have shown the same woefully inadequate protocol in every fishery reopening since the well was capped.” Brabeck shows community groups how to take seafood samples. “These groups are actively engaged in seafood issues, and they decide what they want to test for,” he said. The Louisiana Bucket Brigade does training and pays for tests–which can be expensive. “Once we have results, we bring an interpretation of the numbers to the community where the samples were taken, and report what the results can mean for environmental and public health,” he said. “This should be the job of the FDA and NOAA, and it sickens me that it’s not being done by our government.”

Read the full article →

Robert L. Cavnar: Responding to the Hydraulic Fracturing Issue

February 8, 2011

As we’ve discussed before, the practice of hydraulic fracturing to produce oil and gas has grown into a controversy being argued about in local townhalls all over the country all the way to the halls of Congress in Washington.

Read the full article →

Dr. Stan Humphries: Underwater Homeowners Unable to Swim to Warmer Waters?

February 2, 2011

Imagine this: You’re a successful professional in a small city, circa 2005. Your job is going well and the housing market is going gangbusters, so you dive in and buy a great starter home. You put down 10 percent (a lot for the times) and take out a 30-year fixed loan with monthly payments you can easily afford. You are responsible. Fast forward a few years, and the Great Recession is underway. Your company is in trouble, and you get laid off. Since you bought near the peak of the market and only put down 10 percent, you owe more on your mortgage than your home is worth. You’re underwater, like more than one in five single-family homeowners with mortgages, according to my real estate research firm Zillow. You’ve got enough in savings to get by for a few months, and you start searching for a job. Your area has been hard-hit by unemployment, so you’re thrilled when you get an offer from across the country. One problem: You’re stuck in your home. Or are you? The idea that negative equity impacts labor mobility is a notion that has likely occurred to anybody who’s thought about the matter for more than a couple minutes. Our acceptance of this notion is aided by a constellation of facts that seems to support it: 1. Long-term unemployment, measured as the percentage of unemployed people who have been out of work for more than 27 weeks, is at its highest level (44.3%) ever seen in the data series stretching back to the late 1940s. An interesting phenomenon considering that while unemployment itself is high (9.4% currently), it has been higher in the past (10.8% in November 1982). 2. Labor mobility is quite low. Only 1.4% of Americans moved between states in the year ending March 2010, the lowest interstate migration rate in the past fifty years. Moreover, interstate migration encountered a sharp decline in 2006, the year in which home values crested and started to fall. 3. The housing recession that began in 2006 and has already led to a decline of more than 26% in the value of homes (assuming they are sold in a non-distressed transaction) has created rates of negative equity that are unprecedented in the post Great Depression era. At the end of the third quarter of 2010, Zillow estimated that 23.2% of single-family homes with a mortgage were in a negative equity position. So, the data appear incontrovertible: high negative equity has led to decreased mobility which, in turn, has led to higher-than-normal long-term unemployment. The icing on the cake? A report in 2008 from the New York Fed confirming this relationship in a direct empirical test. Mobility was almost 50 percent lower for owners with negative equity than owners with positive equity. Slam dunk, right? Revised Data Throws Cold Water on Relocation Theory As with many complex economic problems, jumping to conclusions is not so simple. Late last year, the Minneapolis Fed released a couple papers that threw cold water on the whole argument. First came a paper arguing that migration between states actually didn’t suffer a precipitous decline in 2006. What happened instead is that the Census Bureau, who collects the data to compute the metric, changed their method of accounting for missing data (when respondents can’t or won’t answer a question). Once correcting for the change in methodology, it turns out that interstate migration has been on a slow, steady decline since 1996 and there was no actual blip in 2006. The reasons behind this longer term decline are the focus of active, ongoing research into whether mobility has become less necessary or simply harder and more expensive. Second came the paper taking another look at the New York Fed analysis and showing that the original authors’ treatment of missing data had biased the results. Reproducing the analysis with the change in the treatment of missing data found that homeowners with negative equity are at least as mobile as those with positive equity, and that those with high levels of negative equity are particularly mobile. Theoretically, this latter conclusion makes some sense for an underwater homeowner since the upside of moving (by defaulting and getting into a cheaper housing situation) grows relative to the downside (taking a credit hit because of foreclosure) as the level of negative equity grows. (Interesting side note: a senior economist at the Minneapolis Fed, Sam Schulhofer-Wohl, was author on both papers; Greg Kaplan at the University of Pennsylvania was co-author on the first). In conclusion, negative equity is toxic in a lot of ways. It combines with unemployment to increase the foreclosure rate which, in turn, depresses home values. It also slows the conveyor belt of homeowners selling their current homes and buying up to more expensive ones because they can’t easily sell due to negative equity. But, as markets continue to experience declines in home values towards what Zillow hopes is a bottom later this year, it is at least somewhat comforting that negative equity doesn’t appear to be leading to stasis in our labor market. We’ll take good news wherever we can find it.

Read the full article →

Joan Williams: Stop Socializing the Downside and Privatizing the Upside

February 1, 2011

Cross-posted from New Deal 2.0 . I have been watching Clint Eastwood films lately and thinking about his role in fueling the belittlement of government. In Dirty Harry , for example, the Eastwood character is a loner who stands up to lily-livered bureaucrats who lack the cojones to do what needs to be done and to morally corrupt politicians who cave in to bad guys for a living. This kind of film was part of a sustained, and dazzlingly effective, cultural agenda to discredit government. A key mechanism of enforcing this view is the snarl — it’s not really an argument — that having the government undertake any given task is… socialism . For thirty years, Democrats have lacked a cogent response. In the debate over health care, they tried to counter the socialism charge by designing reform according to Republican principles: no to single payer, no to the public option, yes to private health insurance (an industry so inefficient that Americans spend one third of their health care dollars on paperwork, but I digress). Democrats are left still facing sneers of socialism. Trying to counter this charge by messing around with policy design details is a strategy fated to fail. What we need instead is a way of reframing the debate that begins to reverse the discrediting of government. The financial crisis presented a golden, largely squandered, opportunity to begin this process. No better time than the present. Americans recently heard reports of bank profits so high that major banks are declaring dividends . This presents a teachable moment to send a much more effective message than Obama’s old fashioned populism that demonizes bankers as “fat cats.” Here’s a fresh response: What conservatives are proposing is to privatize the upside of the economy while socializing the downside. Take the banks. Back during the Great Recession, they were only too happy to socialize risk. But now, with profits aplenty, banks have lost interest in sharing. After we socialized the downside risk, now they want to privatize the upside risk. This doesn’t make a whole heck of a lot of sense. But it’s a consistent theme in Republican proposals. Take the new Republican health care proposal . It wants to preserve for private industry the right to insure relatively healthy people off whom insurers can make a profit. Again, Republicans want to privatize the upside and let industry keep those profits, and socialize the downside — and then deride government for needing to levy taxes to cover the costs of shouldering that risk. A similar dynamic is at work at the local level. A recent California ballot initiative makes it more difficult for local governments to impose fees on developers as a condition of approving development. The fees required the developers to pay for the costs of the water, sewers, schools, and parks that would serve the new subdivisions. Not surprisingly, the developers hate fees because they prefer to socialize the costs of infrastructure and privatize the profits of development. So here’s the message: The next time Republicans snarl “socialism,” Democrats need to re-examine the baseline assumptions. Often you’ll find a proposal to privatize profits and socialize risk. Calling that out is the first step towards changing Americans’ negativism towards government. Sign up for weekly ND20 highlights, mind-blowing stats, event alerts, and reading/film/music recs.

Read the full article →

Daniel Dicker: Opaque Commodity Trading: You’ll Be Paying for it at the Pump

January 25, 2011

The final dam to stopping $120-a-barrel oil and $4-a-gallon gas is being breached, as financial regulation continues its daily erosion into worthlessness. Yesterday, Ohio Senator Sherrod Brown demanded that the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) use the Dodd-Frank tools at their disposal to protect consumers and small business from artificially inflated energy prices. Yet, watching the CFTC attempt to back up Dodd-Frank legislation since it was passed has been like watching salmon flop upstream as the water drains out — it’s slow, arduous and likely to lead nowhere. It is clear now that we will instead be witness to the highest prices for commodities ever, fueled by the biggest influx of profit-driven trading and investment ever, unstaunched even in the slightest by financial regulation legislation. In my upcoming book, Oil’s Endless Bid , due out from John Wiley & Sons in March, I argue that financial influences from investors and traders and the massive growth of derivatives markets have been the single most important factor for oil’s high and unreliable price, far outstripping fundamental arguments of emerging market growth, peak oil or any other supply constraints or a devaluing dollar. Putting controls on at least some of these speculative influences was supposed to be one of the goals of Dodd-Frank, but the actual rule-making to put teeth behind the legislation has been left to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). But, since it began writing proposals for rules in July 2010, the CFTC has literally been buried by the pushback from industry lobbyists, hired-gun lawyers, derivatives broker/dealers and virtually every industrial corporation with a trading desk that depends even marginally on derivatives activity to protect or augment profits. The problem has been the virtual avalanche of opinion that has descended on the commissioners has been almost entirely from the industry side; no one has bothered to speak for the American public — the consumer — and the industry is lobbying for Dodd-Frank and the CFTC’s profit-dissolving proposals to go away. Consequently, there has been no substantive rule writing to date, despite the mandate of the legislation to have rules for energy markets in place by January, a deadline that the CFTC has already indicated it will miss. Two specific areas have already convinced me that the rules will ultimately be toothless, business will proceed as usual and whatever is implemented will do nothing to curb the explosive price rises we’ve seen not only in oil, but in copper, corn, coffee and cotton last year. Proposals on contract position limits, necessary to avoid any single participant from having overwhelming influence on prices, were argued previously in December without resolution. Bart Chilton, the one commissioner committed to strict position-limits in futures markets has given up on a hard limit, proposing a much weaker “point system” to monitor participants, without any authority to force any limits or liquidation of positions. If Chilton has given in on this crucial point, we shouldn’t expect substantial position-limiting rules in futures markets to come from the CFTC. Indeed, the commission has tabled the entire issue until 2012, a year past their mandated deadline. Another issue defining new swaps clearinghouses and who can own them has generated similar industry interest and push back. Creating “aggregately”-owned clearinghouses would help in transparency, fairness of access and help keep the clearing business competitive. Undue influence by a small group of banks in a new Swaps Execution Facility (SEF) threatens independent control of these new trade nexuses and gives far too much of a trading advantage for the bank owners. Republican commission members have agreed with investment bank lawyers and the Futures Industry Association (FIA) that even the proposed 40% ownership limit for any one participant is still too low. A recent Department of Justice opinion advocating third-party ownership of new SEFs has been excoriated by industry spokespersons representing the banks saying: “The DOJ letter’s analysis appears deficient and fails to consider the relevant history and features of the derivatives markets.” The intention of Dodd-Frank legislation to create transparent swaps clearing is being lost: If allowed to majority-own these new SEF’s, banks will enjoy pass-through clearing that will in name only be at all different from the bilateral clearing system that is already in place and has sunk derivative markets in the past. The bottom line is that commodity trading isn’t about to change one iota from the mechanisms that have caused one boom and bust cycle for oil already and is currently causing others in corn, coffee, copper and cotton. A great opportunity to avoid the similar problems in oil and other commodities we saw in 2008 with credit default swaps and mortgage securities is being lost. Get ready for $4 gas and your local Starbucks brew heading north of 5 bucks — all courtesy of the financial lobbyists, hedge fund traders, industry spokesmen and a brow-beaten CFTC.

Read the full article →

Dan Dorfman: The Man Who Turns Water Into Gold

January 22, 2011

When we’re young, we build castles in the sand. And when we grow up, some of us build empires. One fella intimately familiar with the empire-building process, a relatively unknown name to the masses, unlike such nationally known empire builders as Warren Buffett and Bill Gates, is 67-year-old Dick Heckmann. Not only has he done it before, but he’s busily engaged in pursuing an encore. “I want to be an $800 million gorilla again,” says Heckmann, a one-time Fuller brush man who’s convinced he’s off to a solid start in achieving that goal. The Old Testament says dream no small dreams, and that surely applies to our would-be gorilla, not only an achiever who dreams big, but one who doggedly follows up with the necessary action to make sure his dreams will come true. That was the case in 1990 when Heckmann, together with the aid of a secretary, founded United States Filter Corp., a New York Stock Exchange-listed company that treated waste water and water that went into manufactured products. Though the subsequent acquisition of 260 water firms and internal growth, he built a booming business with annualized revenues of $5 billion over the next nine years that was sold in 1999 to Vivendi for $8.2 billion. In the process, the sales of U.S. Filter under Heckmann’s leadership doubled every year for nine straight years, while the company’s shares ballooned from $0.75 to $33. So any investor who plunked down a few bucks on Heckmann wound up making a bundle as he literally turned water into gold. The latest project for Heckmann, who has amassed an estimated net worth of about $200 million, which includes a part ownership in the Phoenix Suns basketball team, is big board listed Heckmann Corp. Launched in November 2008 and headquartered in Palm Desert, CA., it buys and builds companies in the water sector. Once again, our empire builder is off and running. In a little more than two years, Heckman has developed a host of water-related businesses and has become a dominant player in water treatment related to energy (notably getting rid of excess water coming out of gas wells). Among the operations and investments are a 100% ownership of China Water & Drinks, one of the largest suppliers of water to Coca-Cola in China, a 100%-owned produced water pipeline and disposable company based in Tyler, Texas, a 50% ownership of a water solutions company, a joint venture between Heckman Corp. and big board-listed Energy Transfer Partners L.P., and a 7% stake in Underground Solutions, a supplier of PVC pipe with patented technologies. You can invest in chips, toys, cars and steel, Heckmann notes, and everyone knows the name of the biggest player. But not so, he points out, in water, which is probably a trillion-dollar business and is the only industry he knows in which he wouldn’t have to fight an 800-pound gorilla. Heckmann aims to fill the void. Within five years, he figures, his firm will be the largest independent pure water company in the U.S. and the only one at that time with annual sales of more than $1 billion. Maybe so, but he’s got a long way to go. In its first full operating year (2009), Heckmann Corp. posted sales of $35 million, accompanied by a whopping $395 million loss. Late last year, the company acquired a firm with $70 million of sales, raising overall volume to $105 million. Heckmann wouldn’t discuss 2011 prospects, but expectations in some quarters have it that the company, which is believed to have turned profitable in last year’s fourth quarter, will record $140 million in sales this year and an EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization) of about $20 million. At the moment, says Heckmann, the company has $200 million in cash, no debt and a team that has done it before (a reference to his hiring of a number of former U.S. Filter employees). An obvious question: Why, given his age and his hefty net worth, is Heckmann looking to build another empire? “Because,” he quipped, “I started playing golf, I’m never going to make the senior tour, and I love the water business.” Whether indeed Heckmann can pull off a spectacular encore is anybody’s guess. At least some market players are skeptical, as evidenced by the company’s stock performance (the firm went public at $8 a share, rose to as high as $10.74 and is now selling at $4.96). Likewise, there is a current short interest (a bet the stock price will fall) of more than 3 million of the company’s roughly 108 million shares outstanding. “Heckmann is a big maybe and this is the wrong environment for maybes,” says one short seller, who is making money on his Heckmann short position. Neil Weisman, a former hedge fund manager who ran Chilmark Capital between 1987 and 1993 and turned in some dazzling showings, disagrees. “Heckmann is only in the second inning,” says Weisman, who expects strong growth and the shares to trade north of $10 over the next 12 months. Apparently, he’s putting his money where his mouth is, reportedly holding, I’m told, somewhere between 2 and 3 million shares in his own personal account. As Weisman sees it, “H20 is the way to go and Heckmann is the best way to do it.” What do you think? E-mail me at Dandordan@aol.com .

Read the full article →

Fact Check: GOP Health Care Reform Claim Appears Shaky

January 19, 2011

WASHINGTON — Republicans pushing to repeal President Barack Obama’s health care overhaul warn that 650,000 jobs will be lost if the law is allowed to stand. But the widely cited estimate by House GOP leaders is shaky. It’s the latest creative use of statistics in the health care debate, which has seen plenty of examples from both sides. Republicans are calling their thumbs-down legislation the “Repealing the Job-Killing Health Care Law Act.” Postponed after the mass shootings in Tucson, a House vote on the divisive issue is now expected Wednesday, although Democrats promise they’ll block repeal in the Senate. A recent report by House GOP leaders says “independent analyses have determined that the health care law will cause significant job losses for the U.S. economy.” It cites the 650,000 lost jobs as Exhibit A, and the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office as the source of the original analysis behind that estimate. But the budget office, which referees the costs and consequences of legislation, never produced the number. What follows is a story of how statistics get used and abused in Washington. What CBO actually said is that the impact of the health care law on supply and demand for labor would be small. Most of it would come from people who no longer have to work, or can downshift to less demanding employment, because insurance will be available outside the job. “The legislation, on net, will reduce the amount of labor used in the economy by a small amount _roughly half a percent_ primarily by reducing the amount of labor that workers choose to supply,” budget office number crunchers said in a report from last year. That’s not how it got translated in the new report from Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, and other top Republicans. CBO “has determined that the law will reduce the ‘amount of labor used in the economy by.roughly half a percent.,’ an estimate that adds up to roughly 650,000 jobs lost,” the GOP version said. Gone was the caveat that the impact would be small, mainly due to people working less. Added was the estimate of 650,000 jobs lost. The Republican translation doesn’t track, said economist Paul Fronstin of the nonpartisan Employee Benefit Research Institute. “CBO isn’t saying that there is job loss as much as they are saying that fewer people will be working,” explained Fronstin. “There is a difference. People voluntarily working less isn’t the same as employers cutting jobs.” For example, the budget office said some people might decide to retire earlier because it would be easier to get health care, instead of waiting until they become eligible for Medicare at age 65. The law “reduces the amount of labor supplied, but it’s not reducing the ability of people to find jobs, which is what the job-killing slogan is intended to convey,” said economist Paul Van de Water of the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. The center advocates for low-income people, and supports the health care law. In theory, any legislation that increases costs for employers can lead to job loss. But with the health care law, companies can also decide to pass on added costs to their workers, as some have already done this year. To put things in perspective, there are currently about 131 million jobs in the economy. CBO projects that unemployment will be significantly lower in 2014, when the law’s major coverage expansion starts. A spokeswoman for House Ways and Means Committee Republicans pointed out that CBO’s report did flag that some employers would cut hiring. “The CBO analysis does not claim that the entire response is people exiting the labor market,” said Michelle Dimarob. The law’s penalties on employers who don’t provide health insurance might cause some companies to hire fewer low-wage workers, or to hire more part-timers instead of full-time employees, the budget office said. But the main consequence would still be from more people choosing not to work. That still doesn’t answer the question of how Republicans came up with the estimate of 650,000 lost jobs. Dimarob said staffers took the 131 million jobs in the economy and multiplied that by half a percent, the number from the CBO analysis. The result: 650,000 jobs feared to be in jeopardy. “For ordinary Americans who could fall into that half a percent, that is a vitally important stat, and it is reasonable to suggest they would not characterize the effect as small,” she said. But Fronstin said that approach is also questionable, since the budget office and the GOP staffers used different yardsticks to measure overall jobs and hours worked. The differences would have to be adjusted first in order to produce an accurate estimate. Said Van de Water, “The number doesn’t mean what they say it means.”

Read the full article →

Nicole Lapin: States of Pain: Bankruptcy Bandage?

December 31, 2010

A state used to feel like a trusty light switch, a utility. You could see when that little knob was flicked — to the rescue during times of state disasters like floods, fires and other emergencies. Until recently we always expected the lights would come on, in the same way we expected our banks to be there for us, too. Then, of course, they failed. Overleveraged and unable to pay their bills either, will the states be the next big economic entity not “too big to fail”? To attempt to answer that question, I recently traveled from Maine to Montana to talk to governors of states in all stages of financial trouble or prosperity for a series called ” States of Pain .” After all, both the fiscally sound and unsound have reasons to fear the unprecedented failure of any state. We have all seen the deficit numbers. $25 billion for California. $15 billion for Illinois. $10 billion for New Jersey. Analyst Meredith Whitney , famous for predicting the downfall of the banks, now predicts that we’ll all start feeling the states’ pain in the spring when federal stimulus money dries up. Some set the D-Day date for states even earlier, possibly even next month. CEO turned Tennessee Governor Phil Bredesen predicted that, in January, some states would have, “A cliff they’ve got to navigate. There’s going to be some dislocation. You’re going to see some problems.” When I interviewed him in Nashville for my “States of Pain” series , he chided his gubernatorial colleagues for relying too heavily on federal stimulus money, saying, “an awful lot of states took that money and treated it as continuing money and not like one-time help.” No one disputes the last batch will dry up. Another batch is up for debate, of course. The federal deficit, however, is unarguably swollen and President Obama has asked the public for good ideas to be sent his way. And, he’s going to need some to calm that swell while dealing with some of the world’s largest economies — the states — and avoid giving the situation a cold shoulder with the subsequent “Ford to City: Drop Dead”-esque headlines of 1975. So, as a member of the public, I am here to suggest, Mr. President, that you deposit your newly found political capital in an unlikely place — a bankruptcy bid. Bankruptcy gets a bad rap, but it could be a less costly alternative to another trillion dollar shot in the states’ budgetary arm. Technically, states cannot go bankrupt now like cities and counties under Chapter 9. But, the federal bankruptcy code, like the constitution itself, is a living, breathing document — able to be amended like it has been 27 times before. Federal Bankruptcy Code likes to play the odds — Chapter 7, Chapter 9, Chapter 11 and Chapter 13 are the biggies. But there’s some room left for the even chapters, particularly Chapter 8. A respected but lesser-known (I predict to be better-known soon) law professor, Professor David Skeel, suggests that a Chapter 8 is theoretically constitutional for Congress to enact. If it is indeed constitutional, then it might just add a much-needed arrow in the quiver of our rapidly-diminishing fiscal and monetary policy toolkit. “Although bankruptcy would be an imperfect solution to out-of-control state deficits, it’s the best option we have, at least if we want to have any chance of avoiding massive federal bailouts of state governments,” Skeel recently wrote in The Weekly Standard . The mere idea of bankruptcy sounds unpalatable to some governors I ran this by, like Mark Parkinson from Kansas. “Declaring bankruptcy is not the answer to the budget crisis facing many states,” he told me, adding that “the crippling public relations message bankruptcy would send to businesses and investors and the ripple effect on local communities is too high a price to pay for any potential upsides.” True, at first glance, it seems nuclear. But, the potential upsides to allowing states to declare bankruptcy are far too compelling to dismiss outright. Namely, it would give bite to the barking we’ve been hearing from the states’ governors, like Parkinson, letting them play hardball with their biggest creditors — bondholders and union contracts. Granted, union contracts can theoretically be restructured outside of bankruptcy, but in no meaningful way. State bonds, in essence, can’t be restructured without bankruptcy. I’m not suggesting that bankruptcy is the only option. It’s not even a good one to see to fruition, but the mere threat might reduce the burden on Congress to push through more stimulus or a state bailout. “Some of the biggest benefits would occur even if no state ever actually filed for bankruptcy,” Skeel tells me. “Creditors might agree to much more meaningful concessions if the alternative is a messy bankruptcy that would require even greater concessions.” But, it’s those greater concessions that make municipal bondholders cry foul. While Bond King Bill Gross, founder of world’s largest bond fund PIMCO, is going deep into California and New York munis, claiming the returns are still the best in the market despite the headline risk, even the discussion of bankruptcy as a bargaining chip has caused some to fear bond market hysteria. “There’s no question the bond markets would be unhappy if a bankruptcy law were passed, but they’re already starting to price in the prospect of a default,” Skeel tells me. “What the bondholders who claim that the enactment of a bankruptcy law would mean Armageddon for the markets really want — just as with the big banks in 2008 — is to be bailed out if the states can’t afford to pay.” Skeel believes “everyone needs to sacrifice if a state is in financial crisis; bondholders shouldn’t simply be given a pass.” Reuters’ blogger Felix Simon suggests , though, that bankruptcy is more of a Band-Aid on a gunshot wood and doesn’t avoid a bailout, it just delays the inevitable. If Chapter 8 bankruptcy was an option, Simon says “prices of municipal bonds would plunge, and most states would find it pretty much impossible to borrow money.” (Although, GM’s expedited pre-packaged bankruptcy and subsequent IPO would challenge that idea.) A disrupted muni market, also, seems negligible compared to the ramifications of the federal government getting in the foxhole with states. But, Simon continues, “As such, facing a massive and immediate liquidity crisis, they would be in more need of a federal bailout than before the bankruptcy legislation was seriously mooted.” Mooted? Perhaps. Necessary to avoid more serious financial meltdown? Perhaps. Necessary to consider before firing up the printing press again? Absolutely. “Given the general political consensus against future bailouts, maybe just maybe, this is something to think about. And better to do the thinking now, rather than when such a tool is actually needed, fast,” opined bankruptcy expert Stephen Lubben for Dealbook. Fast is already here if you take into account what economist Nouriel Roubini recently told me . Dr. Doom already cast his spell on the states, telling me debt is up to 20% of state GDP and unfunded liabilities of state and local pension funds is another 20% of GDP, or $3-5 trillion. The argument that the states’ GDPs are huge relative to their debts is right, of course, until it’s wrong. Panic is inevitable if a big state fails — you’d have a run on the bank, or should I say a run on the state. As such, a panel including former White House officials Robert Rubin, Glenn Hubbard and Josh Bolton met in October to simulate what it would look like if a state went down. They set the scenario in 2013, when the fictional state of New Jefferson — said to be the third largest U.S. state — faces a $1.5 billion bond payment. Its governor and legislators are gridlocked. The mock governor calls on the Fed for an emergency loan to avoid default and another sizable loan to keep the state afloat. Then the chairman of the National Economic Council calls a meeting. This is where the simulation kicked in real-time; the audience watched as the mock Treasury secretary, Fed chairman, chief of staff, chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers decided the fate of New Jefferson and analyzed the systemic risk. It doesn’t need to be Too Big to Fail Déjà vu just yet. “There are ominous parallels between the states’ predicament and the condition of the big banks in 2008 before they were bailed out. The one big difference is that, this time, we can see the problem before it blows up and we have a real opportunity to do something about it before it’s too late,” says Skeel. We know the lights are flickering in 48 of 50 statehouses right now. The question has become, do you light a candle or pray the water won’t shut off, too?

Read the full article →

Economy Recovering Slowly, As Jobs And Housing Fail To Add Much To Growth

December 23, 2010

A growing sense that the economy is finally mounting a genuine recovery was reinforced this week as the government released several encouraging pieces of data. But the progress appeared modest and still tenuous, suggesting that even palpable improvement to the nation’s fortunes may not yield vigorous economic expansion anytime soon. As millions of people still struggle to find work, and as many continue to lose their grip on their homes–adding to a still anxiety-provoking glut of foreclosed real estate– many experts anticipate that a significant period of pain may yet lie ahead. Consumer spending, which comprises roughly 70 percent of the nation’s activity, increased in November–the most encouraging sign of all–and new and existing homes traded hands more briskly than in the previous month, even as those levels were down from a year earlier. But economists emphasized that substantial pressures continue to weigh on American consumers, raising questions about the intensity and sustainability of any recovery on the heels of the Great Recession. Ordinary consumers are still absorbing the reality of weak household finances, lost wealth, large credit card debts, and gnawing worries about the job market. Until the economy can again be fueled by spending based on solid and sustainable paychecks–a still faraway moment in the midst of 9.8 percent unemployment–growth is unlikely to be powerful enough to become self-perpetuating, economists said. Ordinary people must first see their finances improve, enabling consumer demand and corporate hiring to start reinforcing each other. “It’s a mixed bag,” said Chris Christopher, senior principal economist for IHS Global Insight. “Certain things are looking good, and certain things, well, you have to wait and see.” Even things that are looking better are far from looking great. Last month, consumer spending picked up slightly, and home sales quickened their pace, according to data released Wednesday and Thursday. As the holiday season began, consumers increased their spending by a relatively brisk 0.4 percent in November compared to October, according to the Bureau of Economic Analysis . Meanwhile, income grew 0.3 percent in November. But economists emphasized that these improvements were relatively modest. Spending and income gains were lower in November than in October. They did look much better, though, than a bleak September, when income didn’t grow at all. Housing sales were similarly lackluster, even as they improved. Sales of previously owned homes increased 5.6 percent in November, while sales of new homes climbed 5.5 percent in the month, according to new releases from, respectively, the National Association of Realtors and the U.S. Commerce Department. But when the yardstick is the same month last year, November’s sales of existing homes were down 27.9 percent from last year, and sales of new homes were down 21.2 percent. Real estate prices, meanwhile, continue to fall, making homeowners more vulnerable to default and foreclosure, and leaving banks still uncertain about the extent of the losses they may yet have to absorb. That tends to make banks more conservative, hanging on to their dollars as opposed to lending them out. Tighter bank credit puts the clamps on businesses that might otherwise expand and hire. Indeed, as economists this week tried to assemble a coherent picture from a flood of contrasting data points, many concluded that modest improvements were unlikely to prove sufficient to lead to robust consumer spending. With the labor market still weak and housing continuing as a drain on the wealth of many Americans, consumers appeared unlikely to spend the dollars necessary to promote a strong recovery. Once the holiday season is over–and with it, the usual seasonal boost to shopping– consumer spending is expected to diminish before it grows again. “That pace of growth is not going to stick around,” said Anika Khan, an economist at Wells Fargo. “Consumers are still fixing their balance sheets.” After many spent above their means in the years leading up to the financial crisis, Americans are now struggling to pay down their debt. That process isn’t easy. During the third quarter, banks wrote off $16.8 billion of debt, accepting losses for loans that wouldn’t be paid back, a recent study shows. On net, consumers increased their debt during that period by $6.5 billion. Still, even as consumers remain generally cautious–and for good reason–the data released on Wednesday and Thursday amplified hopes of a broader economic improvement. Gross Domestic Product, which measures the total output of the U.S. economy, grew 2.6 percent in the third quarter, according to the BEA . Other factors are promoting growth. If consumers aren’t driving, they’re at least riding. “The consumer is able to keep pace with the overall economy,” said Robert Dye, a senior economist with PNC Financial Services Group. “They’re not driving the economy forward, but they are keeping pace.” Consumers face myriad woes. Even as income grew last month, 9.8 percent of the workforce remains unemployed. Companies, apparently waiting for demand to pick up before they resume expansion, are generally sitting on cash rather than using it to hire workers: Relative to their short-term liabilities, corporations are more flush now than they have been in more than 50 years. Indeed, corporations are sitting pretty. Since last year, corporate profits have grown a massive 26.4 percent, the BEA data show. But this boon for bosses isn’t all bad for their would-be employees. Even if corporate cash-hoarding is directly hurting consumers, corporate profits are indirectly helping them. Moreover, the rosy corporate situation seems to be a leading cause of the increase in consumer spending. Stock portfolios are in relatively strong shape. Even as home prices fell in the third quarter, and homeowners saw the stake they can claim in their most valuable asset erode by 2 percentage points, the net worth of households increased 2.2 percent, according to recent data from the Federal Reserve . As the S&P 500 increased 9.6 percent during the third quarter, the gain in household wealth came almost entirely from the stock market. Americans’ stock portfolios have made them relatively optimistic, even as home values slide, said Christopher, the IHS Global Insight economist. Consumer sentiment increased this month to reach its highest level since June, according to a Thursday release from Reuters and the University of Michigan. If home price declines seem obscure to some consumers, stock market gains are relatively easy to perceive. “You know almost on a daily basis what your stock market holdings are,” Christopher said. “With housing, you don’t know how to respond to it exactly.” Further, stock gains are helping to offset losses of income and home value, said Bernard Baumohl, chief global economist for the Economic Outlook Group. “Americans are in a much better position to spend again,” Baumohl said, adding that as consumers take on more debt, they are doing so responsibly, in keeping with their income. “Households have certainly been taught a lesson,” he said. Other economists cautioned that a strong recovery is still far off. Christopher called the unemployment crisis an “extreme drag.” Kahn said the housing market is “dead in the water.” Aaron Smith, an economist at Moody’s Analytics, said the recovery has yet to achieve “escape velocity.”

Read the full article →

David Isenberg: Miles to Go Before the PMC Industry Rests

December 7, 2010

When reading about private military contractors there are two pieces of supposed conventional wisdom to keep in mind. The first, which is especially touted by PMC advocates, is that media coverage of their sector is frequently shallow, inaccurate, incomplete, out of context or wildly sensationalistic. The second is that while there may be problems things are a lot better than they used to be and are getting better yet. Those assertions are, at least partly, true. For example, the tired old canard that private security contractors are just mercenaries in drag is scurrilous and should have been laid to rest many years ago. And yes, thanks to the efforts of legislators, non-governmental organizations, reporters, academicians, lawyers, groups like the Special Inspector General for Iraq Reconstruction and the Commission on Wartime Contracting and even some executive branch officials the overall environment, from an oversight and accountability perspective, is somewhat better. But that is not the entire truth. To paraphrase Robert Frost’s famous poem, “Stopping by Woods on a Snowy Evening,” the PMC industry has promises to keep and miles to go before it rests. As a case in point, consider the remarks made last week by Sen. Byron Dorgan (D-ND), He is Chairman of the Senate Democratic Policy Committee (DPC). He is retiring after 30 years in Congress. On December 2 he addressed the Senate and reviewed the 21 hearings the DPC has conducted on contracting waste, fraud and corruption in Iraq and Afghanistan since 2003. You can see a listing of past DPC hearings here . Sadly, none of the media seems to have covered Dorgan’s remarks. Here is a case where PMC advocates are right; media coverage is lacking. As far as I know I am the first to write on this. But his remarks merit careful reading as they illustrate how far the government has to go before it reaches a level of reasonably effective oversight of PMC. Note that I wrote reasonably effective, not perfect. You can find Dorgan’s remarks in the Congressional Record for December 2, 2010 (Senate)] [Page S8377-S8380]. I recommend you read the whole thing as it is not very long. Here are a few excerpts. I believe I have held 21 hearings as chairman of the Democratic Policy Committee over recent years–21 separate hearings on the subject of waste, fraud, and abuse in contracting in the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Much of it still goes on in terms of the work with the Pentagon on this contracting issue. I have just received a letter from the inspector general at the Pentagon, who is looking into one of the issues of the last hearings– the issue of soldiers and contractors who were exposed to sodium dichromate, a chemical that was the subject of the movie “Erin Brockovich,” soldiers who were exposed and not told they were exposed to that deadly carcinogen and some of whom have already died. They were both National Guard and Regular Army soldiers. In the context of doing a lot of these hearings, I have discovered and I believe that throughout the last decade, we have seen the greatest waste and fraud and abuse in the history of this country. It has contributed immeasurably to this overspending and deficits and debt. I wanted to talk about that work we did, myself and my colleagues, over 21 separate hearings. At one of the hearings we held, we had testimony from a man who, in Iraq, was responsible for rooting out corruption in the Iraqi Government. His name was Judge al-Radhi. I have a photograph of Judge al-Radhi. He testified in this country. He testified that in his work as head of the anticorruption unit in Iraq, he found that $18 billion was missing, most of it American money, most of it coming from the American taxpayer. Just missing. Now, why was he here in the country testifying at a hearing I held? Because he got booted out of Iraq, and he got no support from the U.S. Government as he was booted out of Iraq, and he ended up in this country. But he is the person who was supposed to be rooting out and investigating and prosecuting waste and fraud and abuse. His investigations and the investigations of his staff–some of whom were assassinated, some of whose families were killed–show there was $18 billion–$18 billion–missing, and most of it was American money. Well, that is the story about Judge al-Radhi. We had a hearing early on in this process and talked about the issue of contractors and contracting. As you know, in the early part of the war in Iraq and in Afghanistan, money was just shoved out the back door of the Pentagon, hiring contractors, very large contracts, in most cases no-bid, sole-source contracts. A very courageous woman came to testify before our committee. Her name was Bunnatine Greenhouse . She was the highest civilian official at the Army Corps of Engineers, the highest civilian official in the Pentagon in charge of contracting. Here is what she said. She objected to the way the Pentagon was doing these contracts, massive contracts, sole-source, a massive amount of money, and she watched as the normal processes were avoided and ignored. She testified in public: I can unequivocally state that the abuse related to contracts awarded to Kellogg, Brown & Root represents the most blatant and improper contract abuse I have witnessed during the course of my professional career. This is an extraordinary woman, the highest civilian person in the Army Corps of Engineers. She was in charge of contracting. Two master’s degrees, came from a family in Louisiana. All three kids have advanced degrees. Her brother, by the way, was one of the 50 top professional basketball players in the last century, Elvin Hayes. Bunnatine Greenhouse. Remember that name. A very courageous woman, she saw abuses, spoke about it publicly, and for that she lost her career. She gave up her career. She was told: Resign or be fired. Let me talk about what she meant when she said the most unbelievable abuses she had seen in contracting. I want to do it starting small because then I am going to talk about billions of dollars. But at one of our hearings, we had a man who kind of looked like a bookkeeper at a John Deere dealership in a small town. He was kind of a good old guy with glasses, and he had been in charge of purchasing for Kellogg, Brown & Root or Halliburton over in Kuwait, purchasing the things our troops needed in Iraq. He came and testified, and he said: You know, as I was purchasing things, I was told by my employer, Halliburton: Don’t worry what the cost is, the taxpayer pays for this. This is cost-plus. So he told us a number of examples, big examples, but he brought a small one that I thought reflected the entire attitude. This is a towel. I ask unanimous consent to show the towel on the floor of the Senate. The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered. Mr. DORGAN. This is a towel. Halliburton was to purchase towels for the troops, hand towels. You know, they were purchasing hand towels to be awarded to the troops. So he ordered some white hand towels for the troops, and his boss said: Well, you can’t order those white hand towels. You have to order the hand towels that have the logo of our company, “Kellogg, Brown & Root,” on the hand towel. Mr. Bunting said: Yes, but that would quadruple the cost. His boss said: That doesn’t matter. This is a cost-plus contract. Order the towels. Put our company name on them. I mean, this is such a small but important symbol of the behavior that went on for most of the decade that fleeced the American taxpayers. … We heard from witnesses about the Parsons Corporation, which got a $243 million contract to build or repair 150 health clinics in Iraq. Two years later, the money was all gone, and there weren’t 150 health clinics, there were 20. I had a doctor, a very brave, courageous physician, come to this country to testify to what he saw of the ones that were completed. Unbelievable. So what happened to the money? The American taxpayers lost the money. Did this improve the health of the Iraqis? The physician who came to testify said he went to the Minister of Health in Iraq and said to the Minister of Health: Where are those clinics, because I am told the Americans have spent $243 million to build health clinics. Where are the clinics? The Iraqi Health Minister said: Well, most of them are imaginary clinics. Yes, but the money was not imaginary. The American taxpayers’ money is gone. We had several hearings on the issue of Kellogg, Brown & Root. And I mention them because they got the biggest contract, sole-source contract. That is why they are the ones that are mentioned the most. They were providing water treatment to the military facilities in Iraq. So our solders are in military camps in Iraq, and KBR gets the water treatment contract. It turns out that the nonpotable water they were providing to soldiers in the camps that we had a hearing on was more contaminated than raw water from the Euphrates River. We actually had, from a whistleblower, the internal memorandum from Kellogg, Brown & Root, by the guy who was in charge of the water contract in Iraq, and in his memorandum, he said this was a near miss. It could have caused mass sickness or death. But publicly, they said it didn’t happen. The Defense Department said it did not happen. But it did happen, and I asked the inspector general to investigate it. He did. He did a report and said that both the Defense Department and Kellogg, Brown & Root were wrong. It did happen, in fact. That kind of contaminated water was being served to the troops because the contract was a contract that was not provided for appropriately by the company. The company was taking the money and not doing what it was supposed to do with the water. By the way, in the middle of these hearings, while the Department of Defense, Department of the Army, as well as Kellogg, Brown & Root were denying it all, I got an e-mail here in the Senate from an Army doctor, a captain, and she wrote to me and said: I am a physician in the camp. I had my lieutenant follow the water line to find out what was happening because I had patients here who showed that they were suffering diseases and suffering problems as a result of contaminated water. So that came from the physician who was in Iraq on the ground. So despite all of the denials, the inspector general finally issued a report saying: No, no, the Defense Department was wrong, as was Kellogg, Brown & Root. A contract to provide water to these soldiers across Iraq at the Army camps was not being appropriately handled, and very contaminated water was going to those camps. The list is almost endless. I know there is a photograph I have shown on the floor previously because it is another contract to provide electrical capabilities to the Army camps. When you put up an Army camp, you have the need to provide electricity. And I held two hearings on this subject. This is a photograph of SGT Ryan Maseth–quite a remarkable young man, a Green Beret from Pennsylvania. He is shown there with his mother, who is a very courageous woman as well. He was killed in Iraq, but Sergeant Maseth wasn’t killed by a bullet from an enemy gun; Sergeant Maseth was killed taking a shower. He was electrocuted in a shower. And it wasn’t just Sergeant Maseth; others lost their lives as well–electrocuted in a shower, power-washing a Jeep. The fact is, what we discovered when we held the hearings was that the work that was done to provide electricity and to wire these camps was done in some cases by people who didn’t have the foggiest idea what they were doing. Third-country nationals who couldn’t speak English and didn’t know the first thing about electricity were working on these issues. The Army originally told Mrs. Maseth that her son died, they thought, because he took an electrical appliance into the shower. No, he didn’t. He was killed because shoddy electrical work was done that ended up killing this soldier. Now, Kellogg, Brown & Root denied that, as did the Defense Department. The inspector general did the report and said: Oh, yeah. Yeah, that sure did happen. In fact, let me show you what the inspector general has said. This is from Jim Childs, master electrician hired by the Army Corps of Engineers, to inspect this electrical work for which the American taxpayer paid a bundle. Jim Childs, master electrician, went in after I held the hearings. He said: [T]he electrical work performed by KBR in Iraq was some of the most hazardous, worst quality work I have ever inspected. Let me show what Kellogg, Brown & Root said: The assertion that KBR has a track record of shoddy electrical work is simply unfounded. The inspector general did the inspection. We had to redo much of the work in Iraq and Afghanistan, inspect it all and redo much of it. In the meantime, people died. We have demonstrated that there is evidence of shoddy work in a range of areas. Yet the contractors continue to be given additional contracts. For the shoddy electrical work for which some soldiers gave their lives, this contractor was not only given the money from the contract but bonus awards for excellent work. I have tried very hard to get the Pentagon to take back those bonuses, unsuccessfully. But the reason I am going through this is to point out that we have for a decade now been shoveling money out the door at a time when we are deep in debt, spending a great deal of money on the defense of this country, on the Defense Department, on the war effort, and so on. A substantial portion of that which goes out the back of the Pentagon in the form of contracts has represented the most egregious waste in the history of the country. … I started by talking about the issue of sodium dichromate. We think about 1,000 soldiers were at risk at a place in Iraq that is called Qarmat Ali. Some have died. Those soldiers who were at Qarmat Ali told of seeing something like sand blowing all over the place. It was red, however. That was the sodium diechromate, a deadly carcinogen. It is the subject over which a movie was made called “Erin Brockovich.” We have tried for a long time to get the Pentagon to be as active and involved as they should be with respect to the health and safety of those 1,000 soldiers who were potentially exposed. Like most of these issues, they have been very slow to respond. My point is twofold. One is about supporting America’s fighting men and women, doing what is right for them. There have been a number of people in the Pentagon–one of whom testified before the Armed Services Committee in the Senate and who I strongly believe knew he was not telling the truth. He was a general, as a matter of fact. There have been a number who have denied virtually all of these circumstances. Yet inspectors general have investigated and said they are wrong. Obviously, the contractor denies these things. The contractors have gotten wealthy doing this. We have had whistleblowers come in. A woman came in and told us she was working at a recreational facility in the war theater, and that is at the base. There is a facility where you can play pool and ping-pong and do various things. It was a facility with many different rooms. She worked for Kellogg, Brown & Root and she was to keep track of how many people came in because they got paid based on how many people came in. She said: What they told me to do was to keep track of how many people came in to each room, and that is what we billed the government for. If somebody came in and went through three rooms, the government was billed for three visits. I went to the people in charge and said: This is fraud. We can’t do this. We are defrauding the government. They immediately put me in detention in a room under guard and sent me out of the country the next day. It is the story of virtually all the hearings we have held. … This has been an abysmal record. In this decade, the amount of money spent on contractors–in many cases with no-bid, sole-source contracts that were negotiated under the most abusive conditions and in violation, in many cases, of rules, according to the highest civilian official in charge of contracting–has been a disgrace. This country needs to do much better. The work I and a number of my colleagues did holding these hearings has in many ways held up a spotlight and tried to shine it on the same spot. We have cajoled, embarrassed, and pushed, and I think we have made some progress. But so much more needs to be done and can be done.

Read the full article →

David Isenberg: Exposing Troops to a Carcinogen Is Not Part of Supporting the Troops

November 13, 2010

I truly did not intend to write about KBR for two consecutive days in a row. But as the saying goes, when it rains, it pours. We have a new development in the Qarmat Ali lawsuit which I last wrote about on October 22. This is the case where U.S. National Guard troops from Indiana, Oregon, South Carolina, and West Virginia were exposed to sodium dichromate, a known and highly potent carcinogen at the Qarmat Ali water treatment facility in Iraq. The ever laudable Ms. Sparky already has an excellent post about this and I’ll get back to that later. But as The Oregonian first reported: Documents exchanged in an Oregon lawsuit suggest that Kellogg, Brown and Root managers had medical tests proving workers at an Iraqi water treatment plant had “significant exposure” to a cancer-causing chemical, and managers worried about KBR’s liability as a result. The minutes of an Oct. 2, 2003 meeting about blood and urine tests from workers at the Qarmat Ali plant contradicts KBR’s long-standing claims that there was no medical evidence of harm. The documents also indicate KBR’s top health, safety and environmental manager knew plant workers continued to use the toxic chemical long after health alarms were raised. While piles of the corrosion fighter containing hexavalent chromium blew in the desert wind, the workers inside mixing the material wore gas masks. You can find the minutes here . Now bear in mind that ever since the law suit was filed against KBR it has steadfastly denied any wrongdoing and stated there is no proof of health problems from exposure to hexavalent chromium at Qarmat Ali. This, despite the fact that hexavalent chromium is recognized as a human carcinogen via inhalation [Note: Hexavalent chromium refers to chemical compounds that contain the element chromium in the +6 oxidation state. Virtually all chromium ore is processed via hexavalent chromium, specifically the salt sodium dichromate.]. Now I ask you to go and read the entire minutes in their entirety just so people don’t say I am cherry picking selected excerpts to prove a point. That said, consider the remarks at the very beginning. These are said by Chuck Adams, who was KBR’s HSE Manager for Team RIO [Restore Iraqi Oil] South. We are here to talk about the problem and share information so that we are all on the same page Around May-June we identified what chemicals were present Around July realized that Sodium Dichromate was in more places than supposed to be, basically open to atmosphere, scattered all over the water treatment plant Sodium Dichromate has been banned in the USA, no longer used for Water injection Sodium Dichromate has been identified as a high carcinogen Started doing testing to assess potential problem. Results showed high levels of Chrome III and Chrome VI Air samples results did not show threat Urine and blood sample showed elevated of chromium, meaning that there was a significant exposure Started doing some sealing in the area but people were breaking the seals. Wet back to do re-sealing Cannot allow personnel to be exposed, the company will be liable if let this happen. Now think about that last point for a moment. How, in good conscience can anyone at KBR now claim that there is no proof of health problems from exposure to hexavalent chromium when six years ago its own Health, Safety Environmental Manager was warning of the liability to the company if it continued to allow people to be exposed to it? I mean you don’t have to be Mr. Spock to see the illogic in that. Unless, of course, you are KBR, in which case it whines, oops, I mean argues, that the culprit is clear: it is the fault of the plaintiff’s lawyers who “improperly are attempting to influence public opinion, and the opinion of potential jury pools, by selectively disclosing only a few documents out of the many thousands of documents produced in this case.” I am reminded of the old classic truth, “When the law is against you, argue the facts. When the facts are against you, argue the law. When both are against you, call the other lawyer names.” I’m guessing that it is only a matter of time until KBR starts arguing that the lawyers for the National Guardsman are engaging in lawfare , which is defined as a form of asymmetric warfare waged via the use of domestic or international law with the intention of damaging an opponent. But you can read KBR’s full response here. Now as I’ve noted in the past part of KBR’s defense is to channel the Nuremberg Defense, i.e., it was just following orders. Putting aside the fact that this is germane to regular soldiers and the law is hazy on its applicability to contractors and that it is an ethically deplorable rationale, there is at least a grain of truth in it, which it brings us back to Ms. Sparky’s post. Many of her readers are particularly well informed, as they have often worked as contractors themselves. They point out that: KBR had a Contracts Administrator to communicate to DCMA [Defense Contracting Management Agency] Contracting Officers to ask what they should have done about the situation – clarify. Where is that communication KBR ? What did DCMA tell the company to do ? There are pieces missing, but this memo should lead to a few depositions being taken from those in attendance – some of whom have probably already claimed they knew nothing. and A Contracting Officer would still need to make a determination about this chemical. Who was the contracting officer in charge of that contract ? We want to know their name (s) Where is his or her deposition? Indeed, increasingly it seems a case of what did KBR know and when did it know it. Perhaps we should start calling this case Qarmat Aligate It is a good thing that KBR isn’t a member of the trade group that used to be called IPOA ). Otherwise IPOA might have to rethink its traditional talking point that thanks to contractors “Iraq and Afghanistan are the best supported, best supplied military operations in history.”

Read the full article →

Don McNay: Will our new leaders encourage consumers to save?

November 6, 2010

After the recent election, are going to have a bunch of new people running the show. I wonder if they will encourage consumers to focus on saving. I once heard an economist say, Rich people accumulate wealth. Poor people accumulate things,” he said. He had a trickle up theory of economics. He felt that money burns a hole in a poor person’s pocket while wealthy people will sock it away. Poor people often spend all their income just to survive but there are some who are broke simply because they can’t handle money. There is a financial dividing line that separates savers and spenders. The savers wind up with wealth and the spenders wind up with debt. Debtors can only get bailed out if they are Wall Street banks who are “too big to fail.” Working Americans aren’t deemed “too big to fail.” The line between affluence and poor is getting bigger. For years, poor people wanting to spend had plenty of help from credit card companies, payday lenders, “buy here, and pay here” car lots and subprime lenders. Many people got in over their heads and couldn’t make payments. Companies like Citigroup bet that the fun would never stop and kept lending. They were both wrong. The economy tanked because companies and consumers put too much faith in a system of endless spending and borrowing. People on their way to wealth usually have good savings habits. People on their way to a lifelong struggles blow money on stuff they don’t need. Spending is an instant gratification, like snorting cocaine. One shopper told me that she got a high from shopping like a high from drugs. When I was growing up, I used to think some people didn’t have good jobs. They lived in run down houses and often had their cars repossessed I found out that they made as much money as my parents. The people who lived in run down houses spent money on things they didn’t use and motorboats that never made it in the water. They lent money to “family and friends” even though they should have paying their own bills first. They had no sense of long term planning. Ultimately, they had no money. Spending beyond your means is an addiction. A spending addiction is probably as hard to cure as a drug addiction. It requires changing your lifestyle. Money is a leading cause of divorce. The stress of debt pushes people to escape reality with booze or drugs. When the economy slowed down, the addiction became a crisis. People keeping the balls in the air suddenly couldn’t. They had no backup systems. I’ve frequently hired a casual laborer. He is good at his craft and for 20 years, he made really good money. None of which he saved. Whenever I saw him, he talked about skiing trips, his bass boat or his brand new trucks. Now the economy has turned. His house is being foreclosed on and they repossessed his trucks. He has no savings or credit. His focus was on accumulating possessions. Now he doesn’t have those possessions. Or any money either. If our next set of leaders truly wants to make an impact, they need to get America focused on saving.

Read the full article →

Coral, Marine-Life Devastation Near BP Oil Spill Indicates Much Worse Long-Term Damage Than Feds Had Admitted

November 6, 2010

NEW ORLEANS — For the first time, federal scientists have found damage to deep sea coral and other marine life on the ocean floor several miles from the blown-out BP well – a strong indication that damage from the spill could be significantly greater than officials had previously acknowledged. Tests are needed to verify that the coral died from oil that spewed into the Gulf of Mexico after the Deepwater Horizon rig explosion, but the chief scientist who led the government-funded expedition said Friday he was convinced it was related. “What we have at this point is the smoking gun,” said Charles Fisher, a biologist with Penn State University who led the expedition aboard the Ronald Brown, a National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration research vessel. “There is an abundance of circumstantial data that suggests that what happened is related to the recent oil spill,” Fisher said. For the government, the findings were a departure from earlier statements. Until now, federal teams have painted relatively rosy pictures about the spill’s effect on the sea and its ecosystem, saying they had not found any damage on the ocean floor. In early August, a federal report said that nearly 70 percent of the 170 million gallons of oil that gushed from the well into the sea had dissolved naturally, or was burned, skimmed, dispersed or captured, with almost nothing left to see – at least on top of the water. The report was blasted by scientists. Most of the Gulf’s bottom is muddy, but coral colonies that pop up every once in a while are vital oases for marine life in the chilly ocean depths. Coral is essential to the Gulf because it provides a habitat for fish and other organisms such as snails and crabs, making any large-scale death of coral a problem for many species. It might need years, or even decades, to grow back. “It’s cold on the bottom, and things don’t grow as quickly,” said Paul Montagna, a marine scientist at the Harte Research Institute for Gulf of Mexico Studies at Texas A&M University in Corpus Christi. He was not on the expedition. Montagna said the affected area is so large, and scientists’ ability to explore it with underwater robots so limited that “we’ll never be able to see everything that happened down there.” Using a robot called Jason II, researchers found the dead coral in an area measuring up to 130 feet by 50 feet, about 4,600 feet under the surface. “These kinds of coral are normally beautiful, brightly colored,” Fisher said. “What you saw was a field of brown corals with exposed skeleton – white, brittle stars tightly wound around the skeleton, not waving their arms like they usually do.” Fisher described the soft and hard coral they found seven miles southwest of the well as an underwater graveyard. He said oil probably passed over the coral and killed it. The coral has “been dying for months,” he said. “What we are looking at is a combination of dead gooey tissues and sediment. Gunk is a good word for what it is.” Eric Cordes, a Temple University marine scientist on the expedition, said his colleagues have identified about 25 other sites in the vicinity of the well where similar damage may have occurred. An expedition is planned for next month to explore those sites. When coral is threatened, its first reaction is to release large amounts of mucus, “and anything drifting by in the water column would get bound up in this mucus,” Cordes said. “And that is what this (brown) substance would be: A variety of things bound up in the mucus.” About 90 percent of the large coral was damaged, Fisher said. The expedition was funded by the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. The mission was part of a four-year study of the Gulf’s depths, but it was expanded this year to look at oil spill damage. In a statement released Thursday night, NOAA Administrator Jane Lubchenco said the expedition underscored that the damage to marine life from the oil spill is “not easily seen.” She added that more research was needed to gain a “comprehensive understanding of impacts to the Gulf.” “Given the toxic nature of oil, and the unprecedented amount of oil spilled, it would be surprising if we did not find damage,” she said. NOAA did not provide any officials or scientists of its own who went on the expedition. The Bureau of Ocean Energy Management said its researcher on the expedition was unavailable. Cordes said that the expedition did not find dramatic visual evidence of coral damage in other sites north of the well. But he said it was premature to say coral elsewhere in the Gulf was not damaged. The new findings, though, could mean long-term trouble for the coral southwest of the well, where computer models and research cruises mapped much of the deepwater oil. Referring to one type of coral known as “gorgonians,” Cordes said he had never seen them “come back from having lost so much tissue. It would have to be re-colonization from scratch.” ___ On The Web: Photos of the dead coral: http://www.science.psu.edu/alert/photos/research-photos/biology/fisher-photos/ More about the NOAA expedition: http://oceanexplorer.noaa.gov/explorations/10lophelia/welcome.html

Read the full article →

Middlesex Water Company Announces Departure of Annette Catino From Its Board

October 29, 2010

ISELIN, NJ–(Marketwire – October 29, 2010) –  Middlesex Water Company (the “Company”), ( NASDAQ : MSEX ), a provider of water, wastewater and related services in New Jersey and Delaware, announced today that Annette Catino has resigned from the Company’s Board of Directors effective October 26, 2010. It had been previously announced on August 26, 2010 that Ms. Catino would be leaving the Board prior to the end of 2010. Ms. Catino, President and CEO of QualCare Alliance Networks, was named to the Middlesex Board in January 2003. She was Chair of the ad hoc Pricing Committee and served as a member of the Audit, Compensation, Corporate Governance and Nominating and Capital Improvement Committees. 

Read the full article →

James M. Russell: Chris Rabb Talks Invisible Capital

October 26, 2010

When asked about the overriding concept of his new book, Invisible Capital: How Unseen Forces Shapes Entrepreneurial Opportunity , Chris Rabb put it in five simple words: “why Donald Trump is evil.” Though he says this with a laugh, Trump nonetheless represents to Rabb “how we view entrepreneurship, transcendent of political ideology” and why “a lot of people still believe there’s a meritocracy within [entrepreneurship].” This well-researched and argued book digs deep into the unseen privileges evident in even the most equitable business models. Rabb and I met recently to discuss this and other concepts in his new book. James M. Russell: So what is invisible capital? Chris Rabb: Essentially, invisible capital is human, social and cultural capital and the ways in which they manifest: human capital being your skills, credentials and experiences; social capital being your network and what they think of you; and cultural capital being how you operate in different environments and your ability to communicate in ways that inspire confidence and create opportunity. Though the top predictors for success in business are not race, class or gender that doesn’t mean that the most successful elements of an entrepreneur aren’t related to one’s race, class, or gender. If we talk about invisible capital and how it is manifested, we will be directly dealing with race, class and gender in a meaningful way. JMR: Why did you choose entrepreneurship as the topic? CR: A lot of people simply don’t have the literacy about American entrepreneurship that can actually help them start and run a business or even be an advocate for people who start enterprises, whether for profit or non-profit. But because we do not have that literacy, we do not have the structure nor the capacity to help people in meaningful ways. Right now, it is about rugged individualism. The people we could help, as well as the entrepreneurs, believe this notion that, regardless of background, they’ll just work harder. Because you know, if you watch Oprah and you have that positive attitude, you can do anything. There’s no evidence that proves this myth – because that is what it is: a myth. So the book tries to have us understand that there are different ways of defining entrepreneurship. JMR: Is there a correlation between your solution and social entrepreneurship? CR: Yeah, this overlaps the social entrepreneurship but a lot of advocates of social entrepreneurship do not talk about invisible capital.. Social entrepreneur’s projects require massive resources and a select group of consumers to buy the stuff they sell and often times, leverage pre-existing privileges that by definition excludes others. So if you don’t come to talk about the structural issues that create this invisible capital, then you’re doing a good thing, but you’re not really changing anything structurally. While my solution, commonwealth enterprises, create community assets for shared prosperity, that’s not necessarily the case with social entrepreneurship. Ben and Jerry’s is a good example of a social enterprise. They make great ice cream in a country that is obese. They gave more money to good causes than most corporations of the same size – before they sold out to multinational that is. But at the end of the day, they had a conventional product that was not particularly healthy. Ultimately if you talk about entrepreneurship as a vital part of the economy, you talk about creating businesses that will be self-sustaining and sustain communities and local economies JMR: What kind of existing enterprises are considered “commonwealth”? CR: We need to innovate entrepreneurship. The co-op model is one way which commonwealth enterprises can be facilitated but there are also other forms like low profit limited liability companies, l3cs or certified B corps Benefit corporations, as they’re called. These are just a few of the structural ways to look at building shared prosperity and community assets. JMR: You mention in the book that entrepreneurship transcends political ideology. Explain. CR: Politically, those of us who care about these issues in the terms of how progressive it is, are not invested. Mostly because many people who self identify as progressive or left feel that you have to French kiss capitalism to talk about entrepreneurship. You don’t. Entrepreneurship predates capitalism and there’s nothing inherent in entrepreneurship that is about profit maximization. JMR: Any final thoughts about your book? CR: It’s like the two fish: two fish were swimming along in the ocean and one fish looks at the other and says, “I love the water.” And the other fish looks at him and says, “What’s water?” At some point, somebody is going to have to acknowledge the obvious thing, that we’re surrounded by water and air. But if you don’t ever think about breathing nor the composition of air nor how the lungs work, you can make a lot of bad decisions. And the same thing is true with regard to entrepreneurship. Thank you to Natalie Trujillo for her help with this interview.

Read the full article →

Susan Buchanan: Louisiana Removes Defunct Oil Wells But Hazards Remain

October 5, 2010

This article was published in “The Louisiana Weekly” in the Oct. 4, 2010 edition. The state’s thousands of orphaned wells, left behind by oil and gas producers, are eyesores that can also cause serious injuries, boating accidents and menacing spills in water. On a day spent fishing or hiking in Southeast Louisiana, you may have been dismayed at seeing these steel-and-wood structures, and thought “why isn’t something being done about them?” Officials are addressing the industry’s litter, but at a measured pace because of a limited budget. Since 1993, a state tax on oil and gas producers has generated millions of dollars yearly–and an annual $4 million recently–for the Oilfield Site Restoration, or OSR, program run by the Louisiana Office of Conservation. Those funds are used for the costly process of sealing wells and carting off structural material and equipment. The state inspects abandoned wells once every three years, according to Patrick Courreges, spokesman for the Louisianan Dept. of Natural Resources. A well is considered “orphaned” when the operator hasn’t responded to compliance orders or has filed for bankruptcy. The site’s status is then published in the Louisiana Register of monthly, legal notices. “The OSR program plugs and abandons orphan wells, removes orphan facilities and restores sites as close as possible to pre-well conditions,” Courreges said. By addressing one or several sites at a time, officials have made headway in getting rid of jettisoned equipment following a century of drilling. Since 1993, about 8,200 wells across the state have been identified as orphaned, Courreges said. So far, the program has closed 2,453 wells, 596 production and reserve pits, and another 295 facilities at a cost of $65 million. Additionally, about 3,000 wells were removed from the orphan list after private operators took sites over, or through actions by agencies other than the Dept. of Natural Resources, he said. About 5,400 wells on the state’s orphan list, or 65%, have been cleared from the list to date, leaving 2,762 orphaned wells to be addressed. Jim Rike, petroleum engineer and owner of Rike Services, Inc. in Tickfaw–north of Lake Pontchartrain, said “what has happened in the past is that a well is sold because of low productivity, it gets sold again, and then the final owner tries to squeeze the last drop out of it. The owner stops using the well and is obligated to abandon it properly, but he can’t afford to and declares bankruptcy.” Many of these eery-looking, old facilities are in local bays, lakes and bayous. In St. Bernard Parish, Captain Johnny Nunez, owner of Fishing Magician Charters in Shell Beach on Lake Borgne, said “we still have oil and gas platforms lying in the water in this area from Katrina. The old structures are rusted and have parts that break off.” Nunez continued, saying “hundreds of active and inactive wells exist in Breton Sound, Black Bay and Bay Eloi. Many of them, even some of the active ones, don’t have any lights. The locals know where they are, but they’re still a hazard–particularly for boats coming in from other places.” The shrinking coast is one reason companies abandon equipment, Nunez said. Two boaters ran into a gas pipeline in Eloi Bay in summer 2009, and one was seriously injured. “That pipeline used to be on land, but because of coastal erosion it’s in the water now,” he said. “The injured boater couldn’t collect damages since the pipeline owner is no longer in business.” Lake Borgne, now a lagoon connected to the Gulf of Mexico, was once a lake that was separated by wetlands from the Gulf. Meanwhile, in a recent accident south of New Orleans, a tug vessel pushing a barge struck an abandoned wellhead in the Barataria Waterway in July, shooting natural gas, light crude oil and foul water into the air. The well, which was unlit, belongs to the Cedyco Corp. in Houston and is in Louisiana’s orphan program. The gush lasted nearly a week and left thousands of gallons of oil and miles of sheen in Barataria Bay. A lengthy battle to close old wells continues in Lake Pontchartrain, according to John Lopez, coastal scientist and director of the Coastal Sustainability Program at Lake Pontchartrain Basin Foundation. He said “approximately four or five oil and gas wells, owned by two companies, are producing in the lake, and about two dozen, unused structures exist. Many of those structures should be removed by the end of next year, however, by owners or by the state’s orphan well program. “It’s hoped that the only remaining structures will be those still in service and in compliance.” A 2008-09 survey of Lake Pontchartrain, done by Lopez and his colleague Andrew Baker, found that 25 defunct, oil-and-gas structures–of mostly steel and wood timbers–remained above the lake’s surface. Some are popular fishing spots by day. A number of those sites are in disrepair, with timbers that can dislodge in storms, threatening navigation, Lopez said last week. “Without maintenance, these old structures continue to decay and become more hazardous,” Lopez said. Many of Lake Pontchartrain’s defunct wells have no navigation lights and are threats to boaters at night. Among those without lights, some have wellheads that could leak oil or subsurface brine in a collision, Lopez and Baker said in their study. Several unused, oil and gas facilities in the lake are close to the shore in Kenner, and others are near the Causeway Bridge. In 1991, a moratorium was placed on new drilling leases in Lake Pontchartrain, where reserves are mostly natural gas. In 2006, the lake was removed from the federal Impaired Waters list after a multi-pronged cleanup, and most of it is now considered safe for swimming. In lakes near New Orleans, the Oilfield Site Restoration program “has plugged and abandoned six orphan wells in Lake Pontchartrain, and removed an orphan facility there in 1995, spending $864,100 altogether,” Courreges said. OSR also got rid of an orphaned facility in Lake Maurepas in 1998 at a cost of $145,000. Across the state, “the OSR currently averages $162,500 per site for plug-and-abandonment costs in water locations,” Courreges said. “The cost for plug and abandonment and removal varies, based on wellbore mechanics; well depth, location and accessibility; water depth, time of year and available contractors.” Rike said that abandoned, production facilities are a problem in industries across the nation. An old, tapped-out oil well is not nearly as toxic as, say, an unused creosote plant with storage tanks, he said. Creosote, used for wood treatment, can pollute drinking-well water. You were probably told as a kid that rust causes tetanus and were warned about stepping on nails barefoot. But scientists say tetanus is caused by dirt and germs, not rust. Rike believes that rust from steel in old, abandoned oil and gas wells is not particularly dangerous. “Steel rusts slowly, and in most bodies of water, rust doesn’t pose a threat to fish or drinking water,” he said. Rike said some of the big threats from south Louisiana’s depleted wells are that they bang up boats and snag fishing nets. Any obstacles in the water, like sunken barges in the Mississippi River, are a hazard to navigation, he said, and added that bigger vessels use sound equipment or sonar to avoid them. Abandoned wells in water beyond Louisiana’s three-mile limit are in federal territory. In mid-September, the Obama Administration said oil and gas companies operating in the Gulf of Mexico must plug temporarily abandoned wells permanently, and dismantle unused, production platforms. At that time, Michael Bromwich, head of the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Regulation and Enforcement, said risks from aging, oil and gas infrastructure rise considerably during storm season. One of the chief reasons for removing old, oil and gas wells from south Louisiana’s lakes and bayous is that those areas are vulnerable to storms and hurricanes, and any collapse in structures could threaten the public, Lopez said.

Read the full article →

The Top 10 Ways Workers Waste Time Online: 24/7 Wall Street

October 2, 2010

It is broadly assumed that American workers with access to computers spend some portion of their day using them for personal communication, gain, or pleasure. The actual wasted time and productivity turns out to be staggering. 24/7 Wall St. looked at a number of workplace studies about how people spend time online. Most of this research says that workers with PCs are on the Web for 20 to 22 hours a week. About a quarter of that is time spent on personal matters. That is about five hours of lost productivity each week. It is hard to imagine that any other activity before the advent of the PC could have eaten up that amount of time at work, even considering such productivity killers as going to the corner store to buy cigarettes or gossiping with co-workers around the water cooler. The PC has become a tremendous tool of both efficiency and waste at the same time. It gives workers the unprecedented ability to communicate, record and analyze data. Employees, though, now evade their responsibilities at work thanks to a nearly infinite number of social interaction, entertainment and pornography websites

Read the full article →

Brett King: The Customer-Centric Initiative Project

September 23, 2010

Getting a head start on customer centricity As I tour the globe talking to banks and other financial institutions, the issue of how to make the migration to a truly customer centric organization is often agonized over. While many are keen to see that goal materialize, there are just as many who feel organizational inertia and long entrenched silos are just too significant a hurdle to circumvent. Innovation in the customer space is often a challenge too. How do you really create an innovative organization when your traditional roots are all about, well…tradition. The big ships of industry, banks definitely included, are like massive supertankers. Ships that turn slowly and once they have a head up of speed are very difficult to slow or turn when set on a course. In a world where channel complexity, technology adoption and consumer behaviors are pushing the envelop of just about every service organization to adapt at warp-speed, how do we create speedboat type instincts when the organization is lumbering along supertanker style? Big Banks are like SuperTankers – they don’t change direction easily The Google Time Initiative Google gives it’s engineers 20% of their time to work on the project of their choice. The Google time initiative is consistently cited as one of the reasons why employees rank Google as one of the best companies to work for as voted by Forbes, FastCompany, etc. It’s also a great generator of innovations as adhoc collaborations are born out of necessity, common interest or just the pure exploration of a better user experience. Some of those initiatives like Android end up becoming a stable of Google’s core range, while others like Google Wave burn bright for a time, create great learnings, but go on to become something entirely different from what started. Getting a bank to give their employees 20% of their time to work on a project or initiative of their choosing, might be too much of an ask for those ships of industry, but it is a way to drop a speedboat in the water and see how it performs. If the idea works, it can then be incorporated back into the overall business as part of a longer-term shift. The VC Approach If you’ve ever engaged in discussions with Venture Capital firms about a business plan, you’ll appreciate how brutal the process is in dismissing badly thought out ideas or poor business cases. If we ran a lot of the existing bank processes, products and business units through a VC selection process these days, many simply would not survive. But because they are embedded ‘traditions’ they get retained. Good examples of this today are paper statements sent by snail mail, or offering a checking account to new customers by default. If we were a brand new start-up bank, it’s unlikely these would be the preferred approach in a business plan today. Using the VC approach, however, can select the most likely candidates for success in the innovation sandbox. VCs often use the formula of reviewing 100 business plans, selecting perhaps 5-10 for further review and selecting perhaps 2 or 3 for some scale of investment. This is a solid approach to pitching new ideas for seed capital internally to see if individual innovation initiatives have merit versus other competitive ideas or bids. It also means that work isn’t done on the basis of simply cool technology, but real revenue or cost savings thinking. The IDEO Approach I’ve always admired the IDEO design team for their deep dive methodology. I think that the deep dive remains probably the most creative management and design process that there is today. By dividing teams into separate groups to brainstorm innovative approaches, you get not a single idea, but many competing ideas to flesh out. The advantages to this process can best be summed up by a great quote from their design team: Enlightened trial and error succeeds over the planning of the lone genius… IDEO Design Once a month, or once a quarter, try getting your channel team together and brainstorming a new customer journey or experience. Then use the VC approach after you’ve prototyped the idea to come up with something better for the customer. The deep dive process will take you to new heights of innovation much quicker than the planning of the lone banker. Especially if that banker has had 30 years of banking experience – trying to get him to think innovatively is like trying to turn that huge supertanker. The Customer Centric Initiative So putting all of these best practice approaches to innovation together, I propose a new initiative for your bank today to get started on the path to customer satisfaction, deeper relationships, and more profitability. Give everyone in your product and channel team, 20% of their time over the next 2-3 months to spend on improving customer journeys and experience. Underpin this by creating a multi-channel deep dive session once a quarter where all of the channel teams, supported by product representatives, look at new ways of engaging the customer. Prototype the customer journey on paper. Sketch up new web, mobile, or ATM screen flows to show how the interaction could be simplified and improved, or even come up with completely new ideas based on behavioral analytics. Let’s get this customer centric initiative on the road. It takes a long time to break silos, so let’s not even try to tackle that until we can get the team thinking about customers. The Customer Centric Initiative is a way of doing that without breaking the bank…

Read the full article →

Crowd-Fundraising For Causes Adds Up Fast

September 19, 2010

NEW YORK — One project strapped dozens of digital cameras to kites and balloons and sent them above the Gulf of Mexico to document the oil spill. Another will, hopefully, fly a smart phone into the upper reaches of the atmosphere so it can send photos and video back down. Then there’s the young woman from California who’s set sail around the world, without the backing of corporate sponsors. These projects cost anywhere from a few hundred to tens of thousands of dollars. And to help pay for them, their creators are turning not to deep-pocketed investors but to friends and strangers online. Through websites including Kickstarter and IndieGoGo, these people pledge as little as $1 in exchange for “I knew them back then” bragging rights and thank-you gifts such as limited-run CDs and books. “This is widening the scope of who is getting funded,” said Tiffany Shlain, filmmaker and founder of the Webby Awards, for which IndieGoGo was nominated this year. Many indie filmmakers and musicians turn to the sites because this way they can retain creative control over their projects. Others, such as 24-year-old Emily Richmond, are using them to help realize childhood dreams. “To be a long-distance sailor in this day and age you either have to go the route of trying to break a record, in pursuit of attracting major corporate sponsorship, or you have to save your whole life, finance your own trip but not get to do it (until) you’re up there in years,” Richmond said by e-mail recently while sailing off the coast of Acapulco, Mexico. So, she turned to Kickstarter. Last year she raised $8,141.80 to get her two-year voyage started. Expenses included buying food and outfitting her vessel for long-distance sailing. In a second round of fundraising this spring, she got $7,251 for safety equipment such as a GPS tracker, a satellite phone and a medical kit. She calls the site a “real live dream-machine.” Kickstarter, based in New York City, lets people set a budget and make a pitch, usually in a self-shot video. Many backers, though not all, have some connection to the projects they are contributing to. They come from all kinds of backgrounds – professors, techies, students and filmmakers, dreamers and doers. Many first-timers find the sites through a project they are somehow connected to, and stay when they discover others they like. Creators put a lot of work into displaying their projects on the sites to show, not just tell. There are photos, videos, blogs and links to Facebook and Twitter, along with detailed descriptions of the rewards offered to backers. In addition, a project’s initial backers tend to be people who are somehow connected to it, effectively vouching for their authenticity. IndieGoGo co-founder Slava Rubin said strangers don’t tend to fund projects that haven’t already raised money. Kickstarter’s small staff, meanwhile, vets projects before they go up on the site. The sites also have various fraud-prevention measures in place. Jeffrey Warren’s oil-spill mapping project raised $8,285 from 145 people. Rewards include photos and your name written on the balloons and the kites sent above the Gulf. Warren, a fellow at MIT’s Center for Future Civic Media, said he didn’t personally know most of the project’s backers. “Backers become advocates for your cause – they hit the blogs, newspapers, etc., and it’s the wider network that seems to contribute most, not your immediate friends,” he said. “Probably your immediate friends contribute more directly, for example with their time and support.” The websites make money by taking a small cut of the money raised. On Kickstarter, which takes 5 percent, only projects that meet their full budget get their money. If they don’t, no money is exchanged. Backers pledge using Amazon’s online payment service, and credit cards are charged only if the project meets its funding goal by a set deadline. IndieGoGo, by contrast, lets projects keep the money even if they don’t meet their full funding goal, though in that case it takes a larger cut. The idea behind IndieGoGo was to democratize fundraising, to take it out of the “few people in suits” who have traditionally decided what movie, music album or charity gets funded, Rubin said. The San Francisco-based site’s three founders all had background in fundraising; Rubin, whose father died of cancer when he was a child, had started a cancer charity. The ease with which projects can be shared via Facebook and other channels, along with the comfort many Internet users now have with online transactions, means the time is ripe for crowd-funding. Getting the word out about the projects even a few years ago – before Facebook opened up to the public and before YouTube made it easy for anyone to upload a video online – would have been difficult, if not impossible. It’s not just altruism that gets people pledging. Perry Chen, Kickstarter’s 34-year-old co-founder, said projects offer “bragging rights of being involved early,” especially if the band, film or comic book later becomes successful. There are tangible benefits, too. Richmond, the sailor, is mailing anyone who pledged at least $15 a Polaroid photo from her travels. For those who gave $75, she is sending a coconut. “When I saw Emily’s project I couldn’t even imagine what it would be like to be on your own on the water like that for such a long time,” said Mike Ambs, a Los Angeles filmmaker who’s backed Richmond’s project along with 18 others. He said he is looking forward to getting a photo from Richmond’s adventures. But the feeling of playing a part in something ambitious is also a source of inspiration. “It’s exciting to be a part of it and see how far a little bit can go,” he said. He’s also used Kickstarter to help fund “For Thousands of Miles,” his planned documentary about a man riding a bicycle across the United States. On Kickstarter, the average contribution is $25. On IndieGoGo, it’s $84. Some projects have received as much as $10,000 from a single backer, but those cases are rare. The highest-grossing project to date is Diaspora, an anti-Facebook of sorts that would let users keep control over their photos, videos and status updates while sharing them with friends. The four New York University students behind it raised $200,641 on Kickstarter. Though the sites are reminiscent of single-project online tip jars that popped up earlier in the decade, they work better because they create persistent communities behind the projects. “Those were predicated on a passive involvement,” said Yancey Strickler, Kickstarter’s co-founder. “Kickstarter is much more structured and active. Projects are focused on specific things, they have finite deadlines, they establish relationships, and they clearly communicate what someone gets in exchange.” About 2,500 projects have been funded by about 200,000 people through Kickstarter since the site launched in April 2009. About the same number have failed to meet their funding goals. Danny Pier’s “Astdroid” was among the ones that reached their goals. The 25-year-old software engineer said he is disappointed with the looming end of NASA’s space shuttle program and wanted to do something about it. “I was thinking what could I do to make space more accessible for the everyday Joe?” he said. The answer: Send a Droid smart phone to the stratosphere, using a weather balloon. Running an application built by Pier, the phone, if it makes it, will send photos and video back to Earth through a website. (Other amateurs have strapped digital cameras to weather balloons for high-altitude shots). Pier, who lives in Denver, estimated that his project would cost $1,800, enough for a few phones in case the Astdroid doesn’t take off on the first try. He raised $2,050 on Kickstarter, from 66 people. “I wouldn’t have been able to raise the money without it,” he said. “As it is my friends think I’m crazy, I wouldn’t be able to get any money out of them.” ___ Online: http://www.indiegogo.com http://www.kickstarter.com

Read the full article →

World Water Week opens in Stockholm

September 7, 2010

World Water Week opens in Stockholm

Read the full article →

Sen. Tom Carper: The Latest Oil Platform Accident Is a Grim Reminder of Our Energy Challenges

September 3, 2010

My visit to the Gulf Coast of Louisiana this week turned out to be even more interesting than I had expected. We went on this trip to investigate the progress of the BP/Deepwater Horizon oil spill cleanup and the ongoing claims process for those affected by the disaster. However, shortly after the Army Black Hawk helicopter touched down in Grand Isle, Louisiana, right on the Gulf of Mexico, we were greeted by news of an oil platform explosion some 135 miles or so to the southwest of us out in the Gulf. Thirteen men went over the side of the platform into the water following the explosion. Fortunately, all of them survived, apparently without serious injury. They were luckier than the eleven men who perished during the explosion of the Deepwater Horizon rig more than four months ago. While this latest oil platform fire raged, back at the site of the Deepwater Horizon tragedy another important step in permanently plugging the well was just beginning. Surface support ships and deepwater submersibles were moving into position to remove that well’s malfunctioning blowout preventer and prepare it for a new, functioning blowout preventer to be installed the next day. Once that step was completed, work would continue on the relief wells that – when finished – would allow the “bottom kill” to proceed by September 20, effectively driving a stake through the heart of the well that has caused so much heartache and set off a multi-billion dollar Gulf cleanup and restoration effort. Ironically, this latest explosion occurred as Louisiana’s governor, along with other state and local officials, were calling on President Obama to lift the moratorium on deepwater drilling that he imposed three months ago. Both explosions serve as graphic reminders that drilling for oil thousands of feet below the surface of the Gulf of Mexico remains a very risky business. This week’s accident also reinforces the need to create a culture of safety in this industry, much as the culture we have endeavored to create in our nation’s 104 nuclear power plants. With the goal of safety in mind, a new cop has been put on the beat. It is called the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Regulation and Enforcement or BOEM, and housed within the U.S. Department of the Interior. One of BOEM’s first responsibilities is to create a new regulatory framework and enforcement structure to replace the abysmal efforts of the former Minerals Management Service to regulate the offshore oil industry. Let me hasten to add, though, that all was not cause for gloom and doom in the Gulf of Mexico. Scientists from the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration briefed us that the trillions of oil-eating microbes that Mother Nature has deployed throughout the Gulf of Mexico continue to provide by far the most cost effective cleanup work that’s being done in the Gulf. Just a few months ago the water was teeming with oil, now the presence of oil is measured in parts per billion. While the skimmers there still skim occasionally, and hundreds of miles of boom remain deployed to protect beaches and marsh land, the tide has turned in this battle. As further proof, on the day we were there, the federal government reopened several thousand square miles of additional federal fishery waters to fishermen. That doesn’t mean that there isn’t still plenty of work to do in the months ahead. There is. But a lot of good work has already been done. It’s still being done by a large and dedicated team led by the Coast Guard, and includes – among others – the U.S. Army, the National Guard, NOAA, EPA, local fishermen and their “vessels of opportunity,” some BP employees, and private contractors like Miller Environmental from Corpus Christi, Texas, whom we met. The battle is likely to rage for some time over whether we should continue to remain dependent on hard-to-recover fossil fuels like the oil that lies thousands of feet below the floor of the Gulf of Mexico and whether we should remain dependent on the enormous quantities of oil that we import from undemocratic, unstable countries around the world, oil that now comprises a third of our nation’s huge trade deficit. While that battle rages, though, America has got to be smart enough to put the pedal to the metal to hasten the day when we harness the power of the wind off our coasts to help power millions of flex-fuel, plug-in hybrid vehicles like GM’s Volt and Fisker’s Karma and Nina that will be built right here in America and my home state of Delaware. And, we’ve got to make even bigger strides in harnessing the energy of the sun and other clean energy sources to meet more of our energy needs. Finally, we need to adopt energy conservation policies that affirm our country’s belief that the cleanest, most affordable form of energy in the world is the energy we never use. Sen. Carper is the senior senator from the state of Delaware. He is the chair of the Senate Subcommittee on Federal Financial Management and recently returned from a visit to the Gulf coast where he toured impacted marshlands off the coast of Louisiana, visited a beach cleanup site and was briefed on the cleanup and recovery efforts from the Coast Guard. The trip was part of Sen. Carper’s ongoing examination of the Gulf coast oil spill cleanup and claims process. Sen. Carper held two hearings this summer, “The Gulf of Mexico Oil Spill: Ensuring a Financially Responsible Recovery Parts I and II,” which focused on the costs associated with the response and recovery operations relating to the oil spill in the Gulf. As part of these hearings, the subcommittee heard testimony from representatives of BP, Transocean, Anadarko Petroleum Corporation, MOEX Offshore 2007 LLC (a subsidiary of Mitsui Oil Exploration Company), the U.S. Government Accountability Office, the U.S. Coast Guard, and Kenneth Feinberg, head of the BP claims process.

Read the full article →

Video: Blue Says Coast Guard Rescued Platform Workers in Gulf: Video

September 2, 2010

Sept. 2 (Bloomberg) — Coast Guard Chief Petty Officer Thomas Blue talks with Bloomberg’s Mark Crumpton about the rescue of workers from a platform owned by Mariner Energy Inc. in the Gulf of Mexico that exploded and caught fire. Thirteen workers were on the platform at the time of the blast and they evacuated into the water, according to the Coast Guard. (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Robert Reich: Why a Civil Society Extends Unemployment Benefits

August 31, 2010

I have the questionable distinction of appearing on Larry Kudlow’s CNBC program several times a week, arguing with people whose positions under normal circumstances would get no serious attention, and defending policies I would have thought so clearly and obviously defensible they should need no justification. But we are living through strange times. The economy is so bad that the social fabric is coming undone, and what used to be merely weird economic theories have become debatable public policies. Tonight it was Harvard Professor Robert Barro, who opined in today’s Wall Street Journal that America’s high rate of long-term unemployment is the consequence rather than the cause of today’s extended unemployment insurance benefits. In theory, Barro is correct. If people who lose their jobs receive generous unemployment benefits they might stay unemployed longer than if they got nothing. But that’s hardly a reason to jettison unemployment benefits or turn our backs on millions of Americans who through no fault of their own remain jobless in the worst economy since the Great Depression. Yet moral hazard lurks in every conservative brain. It’s also true that if we got rid of lifeguards and let more swimmers drown, fewer people would venture into the water. And if we got rid of fire departments and more houses burnt to the ground, fewer people would use stoves. A civil society is not based on the principle of tough love. In point of fact, most states provide unemployment benefits that are only a fraction of the wages and benefits people lost when their jobs disappeared. Indeed, fewer than 40 percent of the unemployed in most states are even eligible for benefits, because states require applicants have been in full-time jobs for at least three to five years. This often rules out a majority of those who are jobless — because they’ve moved from job to job, or have held a number of part-time jobs. So it’s hard to make the case that many of the unemployed have chosen to remain jobless and collect unemployment benefits rather than work. Anyone who bothered to step into the real world would see the absurdity of Barro’s position. Right now, there are roughly five applicants for every job opening in America. If the job requires relatively few skills, hundreds of applicants line up for it. The Bureau of Labor Statistics says 15 percent of people without college degrees are jobless today; that’s not counting large numbers too discouraged even to look for work. Barro argues the rate of unemployment in this Great Jobs Recession is comparable to what it was in the 1981-82 recession, but the rate of long-term unemployed then was nowhere as high as it is now. He concludes this is because unemployment benefits didn’t last nearly as long in 1981 and 82 as it they do now. He fails to see — or disclose — that the ’81-’82 recession was far more benign than this one, and over far sooner. It was caused by Paul Volcker and the Fed yanking up interest rates to break the back of inflation — and overshooting. When they pulled interest rates down again, the economy shot back to life. The Great Jobs Recession is far more severe. It’s continuing far longer. It was caused by the bursting of a giant housing bubble, abetted by the excesses of Wall Street. Home values are still 20 to 30 percent below where they were in 1997. The Fed is powerless because consumers cannot and will not buy enough to bring the economy back to life. A record number of Americans is unemployed for a record length of time. This is a national tragedy. It is to the nation’s credit that many are receiving unemployment benefits. This is good not only for them and their families but also for the economy as a whole, because it allows them to spend and thereby keep others in jobs. That a noted professor would argue against this is obscene. This post originally appeared at RobertReich.org .

Read the full article →

Video: Lovera Says Consumers Should Cook Eggs Thoroughly: Video

August 24, 2010

Aug. 24 (Bloomberg) — Patty Lovera, assistant director at Food and Water Watch, talks with Bloomberg’s Melissa Long about an egg recall in the U.S. A nationwide recall of more than a half billion eggs linked to a salmonella outbreak prompted investigations by U.S. lawmakers as health officials said at least 40 new illnesses have occurred in the past four days. (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

USA Signal Technology, Inc. (USST.PK) Announces Change of Control, Appointment of New Board and Definitive Acquisition Agreement

August 16, 2010

Developments to Include Acquisition of Renewable Energy and Water, LLC

Read the full article →

Susan Buchanan: State’s Oyster Growers Weigh Options in Claims Process

August 10, 2010

This article was published in “The Louisiana Weekly” in the Aug. 9, 2010 edition. Oyster growers seeking compensation for losses after the spill worry that payments will hinge on whether damages were from fresh-water flows ordered by Governor Bobby Jindal or the presence of oil. For troubled producers, it may take years for beds to recover from too little salinity in some areas and tar and other spill byproducts elsewhere. Growers have at least two compensation options, said Mike Voisin, seventh-generation owner of Motivatit Seafoods, Inc. in Houma. “Damage claims will be submitted to BP and the Feinberg fund first. If claims are rejected there, they can be presented to the Coast Guard for compensation under the Oil Spill Liability Trust Fund — set up under the Oil Pollution Act.” The spill trust fund originally provided up to $1 billion for oil removal and other damages, but is now capped at $2.7 billion. About 30%-40% of the state’s oyster areas can be harvested after recent reopenings, but the number of usable oysters there is lower than before the spill, Voisin said. Motivatit harvests 10,000 acres of oysters in central and western Louisiana, and has suffered moderate damage from oil in some spots. The company’s sales are down by 50% or more from last year. Rusty Gaude, LSU AgCenter fisheries agent for Plaquemines, St. Bernard and Orleans parishes, said “it’s well documented that oysters require certain conditions, including the right amount of salinity in the water, for survival,” He said seven conduits, built for varied reasons before the spill, were opened in early May “to push water out and theoretically keep oil from the inland estuaries.” In reefs east and west of the Mississippi, salinity levels dropped below a range of 5-15 parts salt per thousand parts water needed for oysters to survive, according to scientists. “Independent lease holders are doing their own damage assessments now,” Gaude said. Louisiana oyster reefs are worked mostly under private leases. And the state’s Dept. of Wildlife and Fisheries plans to start conducting a damage survey soon. Gaude said that before-and-after documentation on the beds will probably be needed for the BP and Feinberg claims processes. “For lease holders, efforts to get claims payments could be settled quickly or they could drag on for years.” After Governor Jindal ordered the diversion of fresh water from the Mississippi River into nearby salt marshes, gates were open at the following conduits in May and remain ajar: Davis Pond Diversion in St. Charles Parish; Caernarvon Diversion and Violet Siphon in St. Bernard Parish; and Bayou Lamoque Diversion,West Pointe A la Hache, Naomi Siphon and Whites Ditch Siphon in Plaquemines. Louisiana oysters normally thrive in estuaries that have all the comforts of home, but if something goes wrong, they won’t develop or reproduce. A good habitat has the right amount of salinity, temperatures of 50-79 degrees, firm bottoms and continuous water circulation to bring in food and oxygen. When asked if BP has a policy for oyster growers seeking damages from fresh water, BP spokesman Mark Proegler responded “as BP has said from the beginning, we will pay all legitimate claims. We are in transition to Mr. Feinberg, a process that should be completed in August. While the transition continues, we will be and are paying claims.” Last week, BP had paid $303 million in claims to date. In an August 3 announcement, BP gave examples of businesses included in its claims process. On the list were “fisherman, shrimpers, oyster harvesters, etc., and charter boat operators who have been affected by the oil.” The word “oil” is worrying some oyster growers, who fear that fresh-water damage might keep them from being compensated by BP or the $20 billion, Feinberg fund. Independent administrator Ken Feinberg is expected to take over the BP claims process in the third week of August. Meanwhile, for anyone considering suing the state for opening fresh-water conduits, Voisin’s view is “the state did the right thing. It kept the oil out of the beds on the east side of the Mississippi.” Johnny Smith, owner of Captain Johnny Smith Oyster Packing Plant in New Orleans, said 40% to 50% of oysters produced in Louisiana are from east of the Mississippi River, and many of them were damaged by the fresh water diversion. “Another 30% of the beds are just west of the Mississippi, and a lot them had tar and oil. About 20% of beds in the state are further west, heading toward Lake Charles, and they might be all right if we don’t have a hurricane pushing tar and oil in there.” His plant has been temporarily closed since June 25 because oysters are so scarce. Smith said “dispersant-treated oil that feels like peanut-butter goo may be contaminating some of the beds west of the Mississippi.” Beds with oil-contaminated shells can’t reproduce and could be lost for many years. He said “in my opinion, beds affected by the fresh-water diversion could recover in 3 to 5 years, and probably faster than the beds that were contaminated by oil and tar.” From April to October, Louisiana oyster farmers move closer inland to the beds they own on land leased from the state, Smith said. Managing an oyster business requires that farmers plant oysters on various sites, hoping weather, salinity and tides will cooperate in at least some of those spots. Growers build reefs on their leased grounds by dropping old shells and limestone to provide habitat for the oysters’ reproductive cycle. Private-lease oysters, caught between April and October, supply Louisiana with half the year’s production, he said. Louisiana also holds thousands of acres of wild, public reefs, where anyone with required, commercial fishing licenses can harvest oysters. The public season roughly runs from October to April. This summer, wholesalers and retailers scaled back operations as supplies dwindled. “We’ve been able to deliver oysters in the shell to all our long-time, oyster-bar customers since the spill, though not always as many as they need,” said Al Sunseri, president and co-owner of P&J Oyster Co. in New Orleans. “An old family friend is shucking oysters from East Plaquemines Parish for us. Our business is in a state of transition because the farms west of the Mississippi–that we get 95% of our oyster to shuck from–have been closed for two months.” P&J has laid off more than half its staff recently. “Our skeleton crew of two drivers and two processing personnel are working much shorter hours, while my brother, my son and I come in about two hours later than usual,” Sunseri said. At one time, he started his day at 2:30 in the morning. The company, which dates back to 1876, has been a fixture on Toulouse St. in the French Quarter since 1921. Sunseri offers some reasons for oyster shortages. “Beds in Area 1 in Lake Borgne have been open, but they were heavily harvested in May and June,” he said. “Area 6 is currently open for harvest but has experienced large mortalities due to the opening of the Caernarvon freshwater river diversion. Areas 1,4,6,7 and parts of 9 and 10 are open now.” To the southeast of Port Sulphur, west of the Mississippi, beds in Bay Batiste and Wilkinson Bay both had oil, he noted. C.J. Gerdes, co-owner of Casamento’s Restaurant in New Orleans, said “we expect to open for the season on Sept. 8, our usual time after being closed for the summer. We’re taking a wait and see as to whether we’ll have Louisiana oysters, which we usually get from P&J and Louisiana Seafood Exchange. We may start with big sacks of oysters from Louisiana Seafood Exchange that come from Apalachicola, Florida, which for an out-of-state product is about as close you can get to Louisiana oysters.” The restaurant tried oysters from Oregon, California and Virginia but they didn’t taste like local varieties. Gerdes, like others, said that while more fishing areas are open now, oysters in some of those locations, especially in Barataria Bay, were hurt by fresh water. And he said “four or five oyster areas were open a month ago but the oyster men were working for BP, cleaning up oil, so you couldn’t get much from those places. It was a Catch-22.” Tommy Cvitanovich, owner of Drago’s Seafood, said prices he pays for oysters have escalated and business is down since the oil spill. “We’ve absorbed the price increase and haven’t passed it on to our customers” at the firm’s two restaurants, located in Metairie and downtown New Orleans. He plans to submit a loss claim to BP for the difference. In the New Orleans office of Atlanta-based Inland Seafood, sales manager Robby Hare said “we haven’t had any Gulf oyster gallons to sell for five weeks. In this same week a year ago, our office sold 106 gallons worth $4,000. Our oysters in gallons are from Mississippi and Louisiana and are shucked at plants near the docks.” Inland Seafood sells to restaurants, institutions and supermarkets. “We are able to get Gold Band pasteurized oysters from Motivatit Seafood,” Hare said.”We can also buy oysters from Apalachicola, Florida. We tried selling Pacific oysters, but they had a different taste and consistency and weren’t as desirable here.” Because of the drop in oyster availability, prices per sack charged by boat owners to processors have risen about 45% since late April, Smith said. Oysters in open areas aren’t necessarily usable, he said. “In many places, growers are having to hunt for them, making their day less productive. They can’t catch enough usable stuff to pay for the fuel and labor to make the trip.” The state plans to conduct an impact study in addition to its routine research. “We take oyster samples every month, all year long, to assess condition in the beds,” said Randy Pausina, New Orleans-based head of fisheries for the Louisiana Dept. of Wildlife and Fisheries. “At this time of year, for example, oysters can be subject to high temperatures, heavy rainfall and tropical storms. We’re working on a longer term, post-spill oyster study under NRDA,” or Natural Resource Damage Assessment conducted by National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. That study will consider ways to return natural resources to pre-spill conditions and to replace lost resources, he said. Randy Lanctot, executive director of the Louisiana Wildlife Federation, said “I think there will be benefits to the coast of keeping river diversions wide open for the past three months. But they will not be known for sure until after the water has fallen. Then we’ll be able to see how much land was created.” Whether large discharges of fresh water and sediment stimulated marsh growth won’t be know until next spring, he said. The Louisiana Wildlife Federation advocates “no, net loss of oyster-growing capacity” for state waters, and supports meshing that policy with the state’s plan for coastal protection and restoration, Lanctot said. Some growers may have to move their harvests from places that have been productive for them, however, Lanctot said. “For oyster leaseholders, who have built productive beds over many years, that can be troublesome.” He said the state should provide reasonable assistance to fishing-community members who will need help making transitions.

Read the full article →

Video: Browner Says U.S. in for `Long Term’ on Gulf Restoration: Video

August 4, 2010

Aug. 4 (Bloomberg) — White House energy and climate adviser Carol Browner talks with Bloomberg’s Lizzie O’Leary about a report from the Interior Department and National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration about the effects of the BP Plc oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico and the administration’s commitment to the environmental restoration of the region. About 74 percent of the oil that leaked from BP’s damaged well in the Gulf is no longer in the water, according to the U.S. government report released today. (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Daniel Dworkin: Creativity and Madness

August 4, 2010

My parents (both psychologists) frequently attend a conference called Creativity and Madness hosted by Los Angeles-based psychiatrist Dr. Barry Panter. Mental health and medical professionals share presentations with titles like “Tragedy, Loss, and Transformation within Bruce Springsteen’s Work” and “Iggy Pop, Narcissist, Shaman and Wounded Child.” The theme of much of the research discussed is the relationship between creativity and mental pathology–or at least periodic anguish. From Van Gogh, to Virginia Woolf, to Kurt Cobain, society now embraces the romanticism of the tortured artist. We expect the most creative among us to be the most unstable. Business innovators, by contrast, are not afforded the same cushion of understanding. The likeliest consequence of “eccentric” behavior in the workplace is an uncomfortable conversation with HR. Our need for innovation in today’s over saturated marketplace is greater than ever, yet most organizations are poorly oriented to spot and develop break-through innovators. Think about the real game changers of the past few decades: Bill Gates, Steve Jobs and Richard Branson for example. They’re college drop-outs. That means they wouldn’t even get through the resume screeners at the companies they went on to found. And big thinking leaders who do go on to finish school aren’t the type to slug it out for 15 years working their way up the corporate ladder until they’re positioned to call the shots. They start their own companies. Are all creative people unstable? No. But they do tend to be iconoclasts, and rogue behavior is not smiled upon in most organizations no matter how progressive they fancy themselves. It takes a certain amount of gumption to propose something that’s never been considered before, and driving a revolutionary concept through to fruition takes more than tenacity. It takes real political skill. Consider the myriad stakeholders a corporate idea generator has to consult, the alliances to be formed, the risks to consider, the brand to protect. It’s enough process to take the wind out of anyone’s sails, and leave a potentially great idea dead in the water. There’s something sweetly just about the fact that the largest, flushest companies are not typically the ones to introduce the ideas that flip the world on its head. Who doesn’t like a good underdog story anyway? In the same breath, it’s the giants of industry with the resources to create, scale, and market the groundbreaking products and services society needs. What if we’re missing out on a cure for cancer or an economically viable clean energy solution because the titans with the funds to develop them are too big and complex to harness their own creative potential? It’s a frustrating paradox–enough to drive anyone mad.

Read the full article →

Gulf Oil Spill Leaves Local Businesses With A Lost Summer

August 4, 2010

ORANGE BEACH, Ala. — A stack of business cards for tourists sits on a countertop beside the cash register at Zeke’s Marina on the Alabama shore. Beside it sits another stack, advertising mental health counseling for locals. It’s been a depressing summer for business owners along the coasts of Alabama and the Florida Panhandle. Unlike Louisiana, which has fishing, and Mississippi, which has gambling, resort towns on this stretch of sugar-white sand rely largely on one industry: tourism. The oil well that blew on April 20 off Louisiana and sullied the season is now capped, at least temporarily, and has been pumped with drilling mud to stem the flow. But with just a few weeks left before school starts, and many tourists having already made other plans, business owners say the remaining time before Labor Day will largely do nothing to keep them afloat. Even now, with the beaches relatively clean and the water clear, business is a bust as many tourists stay away, having heard about soiled beaches or fearing the unknown. Oil or no oil, the summer is shot, and everyone from hotel managers to souvenir shop owners and restaurateurs is looking to BP PLC to help keep their doors opens, their employees paid and their livelihoods intact until next summer. At the Paradise Inn Motel on the main drag in Pensacola Beach, Fla., where a bright yellow sun on the sign advertises its bayside bar and grill, manager Dana Powell said the remaining few weeks of the peak season won’t even be a Band-Aid to the bottom line. The inn is usually booked full through the summer but is now down about 50 percent. Powell wondered whether she would even have a job this winter. “I don’t ask that question because I don’t want to know,” she said, shaking her head. “Anxiety, stress. People have been pretty miserable around here. It’s just been depressing.” About 25 miles east in Perdido Key, Fla., souvenir shop owner Wayne Cavalier is exhausted. He has given up on saving summer and now spends most of his days plowing through paperwork for his BP claims. “There’s just not enough business left to save us,” he said. “Without BP, we’re done.” Cavalier runs two souvenir shops along the coast road, selling beach towels, T-shirts, sandals, rafts, shells, jewelry and other fare typical of tourist traps. He speaks with grief in his voice, pausing occasionally to sigh. “I’m in jeopardy of closing both of them down, and just losing them,” he said. “All of this is coming down on me, man. We’re just trying to make a living.” Tony Kennon, mayor of Orange Beach, agreed that BP will have to come through on claims for many of his constituents to stay afloat. “Summer’s gone, and there was nowhere near enough cash generated for our businesses to make it through the off-season,” Kennon said. “We’re going to do the best we possibly can with the remaining weeks, but our businesses won’t survive without BP’s help.” The company has begun speeding up the claims process for business owners along the coast and has started easing documentation requirements, BP spokeswoman Pat Wright said Tuesday. Taxable lodging rentals for Orange Beach area and Gulf Shores, just down the road, declined 7.3 percent from the year before for May alone, according to the Alabama Gulf Coast Convention & Visitors Bureau. Numbers are not in yet for June and July, typically the busiest months and those that saw the most tourist cancellations this year. A recent report from the Natural Resources Defense Council found the oil had forced beaches along the Gulf Coast to issue nearly 10 times as many closing and advisory days as last year – more than 2,000, compared with 237 in 2009. The Fourth of July weekend fizzled, with many fireworks displays canceled, replaced instead by cleanup workers and heavy equipment removing oil-stained sand from the beaches. Tourist traffic picked up this past weekend in Gulf Shores, bringing a drive-in crowd that can make last-minute plans – but not the kind of weeklong visitors who make or break the summer. A few scattered tar balls stained the sand and a light sheen shimmered in the sun just offshore while families splashed in the surf, sunbathed and tried to make the best of one of the first nice – and clean – beach weekends there in weeks. “Growing up, we always came to Gulf Shores, and this is about as pretty the water has looked as I can remember,” said Michael Hitch, 34, a pastor from New Orleans who came over for the weekend with his wife and three children. “Well, at least today it is,” he added with a nervous chuckle. “We’ve been staying away for about 2 1/2 months now.” Even with weekend tourist traffic picking up, it’s nowhere near what it should be. Don Roberts just opened his beachside service business in Gulf Shores this year, hoping to make some cash renting chairs, floats and umbrellas. “The season’s over now, man,” Roberts said with a sigh, sweating in the early morning sun as he set out his wares. A few tourists trickled by, but an hour later, he had made no sales. “I just hope people start coming back if they haven’t already made other plans,” he said. “It’s going to be tough.” No matter that the beaches appear clean and the water clear now, perception – not oil – has become the region’s biggest hurdle. “Look at the beach; it’s as clean as it can be,” griped B.J. Johnson, owner of Funny Cars in Pensacola Beach, which rents out vehicles similar to golf carts that visitors can use to ferry themselves around town. “But where are the people?” He’s waiting on his BP claims check to help keep his doors open. “We’re 30 days away from Labor Day. You can’t make up an entire summer in 30 days,” Johnson said. “There’s just no way.”

Read the full article →

Gulf Oil Spill: Feds Work To Put A Price On Damage

July 22, 2010

BAY RONQUILLE, La. — The marsh is soaked with oil and the grass is dying. It’s a common sight on the Gulf coast these days, and it’s nothing new for Robert Nailon. The BP-hired environmental consultant kneels as he has done many times on the Louisiana coast, assessing the damage in a task now taking on new importance as the world’s attention turns from the ubiquitous images of gushing oil to the daunting task of restoration. He dips his hand, covered in a blue rubber glove, into the muddy ground. It comes up streaked brown with crude. “You’ve got sheen throughout,” he says, and calls out his findings to a government scientist: Oil covers about 95 percent of the grass, reaching about 15 feet inland. Both men nod, agreeing to add this stretch to the growing and painstaking census of the dead from the Gulf of Mexico oil spill. About 40 BP-government teams are cataloguing seemingly everything touched by the oil, from poisoned plankton and fish to lost marshes and stained beaches. BP PLC will eventually be given two options: Restore everything itself, or pay the government to do it. Before a final bill is written, however, those tallying the damage must still account for things they can’t see – from contaminated fish eggs that never hatch to impacts that may take years to show. Some experts worry BP could exploit the uncertainty to minimize its responsibility. “If you end up with a bunch of dead fish five years from now, it becomes very hard to prove BP killed them,” said Mark Davis, director of Tulane University’s Institute on Water Resources Law and Policy. BP spokesman John Curry declined to detail any potential challenges his company might make regarding wildlife and habitat claims. “We’re not trying to run and hide from the situation,” he said. “Bottom line is we want to know exactly what the impact is, too.” So far, about 4,000 birds, more than 700 sea turtles, dozens of dolphins and one whale have been found dead, or alive but oiled. Oil has hit some 600 miles of shoreline and at least 44,000 square miles of the Gulf. The count doesn’t include the hundreds of oiled birds left in the wild to avoid disturbing their nesting grounds. Pinpointing damage beneath the Gulf’s surface, however, is turning into an even bigger problem. “It’s a 3-D challenge,” said Tom Brosnan, chief of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s assessment and restoration division. “It’s not just on the shoreline, it’s at depth, down to 5,000 feet in the Gulf.” The government is deploying remotely operated submarines to get snapshots of what is happening in the deep, as well as collecting water samples to assess the populations of plankton and other small organisms. Computers will use the information gathered to produce estimates of how many plankton, fish or shrimp are killed based in part on how much habitat is ruined. Gauging the consequences could take years and require some calculated guesswork to account for wildlife that dies or suffers unseen. Federal officials haven’t said whether they’ve assigned a cost to everything. In some cases, however, arriving at a cost can be as straightforward as similar efforts during the 11 million-gallon Exxon Valdez spill in 1989 in Alaska. The state priced each seagull at $167, eagles at $22,000, harbor seals at $700 and killer whales at $300,000. The scope of the latest census is enormous – the Gulf spill has so far unleashed between 91 and 179 million gallons of oil – and the cost of that tally will likely prove expensive in itself. In the case of the Valdez, $125 million has been spent on scientific research since the spill in Prince William Sound, said Stan Senner, Alaska’s restoration program manager following the spill and now director of science for the Ocean Conservancy. Exxon settled with the government for its restoration costs in 1991, for $900 million. Another request 15 years later for $92 million more is pending. In what could be a cautionary note for those working the BP spill, the settlement with Exxon never addressed a major impact tied to the Valdez by some scientists – the collapse of the Pacific herring population. That’s in large part because the collapse came two years after the settlement. BP executives have pledged to “make things right.” But they have disputed some scientific findings, including claims that plumes of oil stretch for miles in the deep waters around the site of the Deepwater Horizon rig, which blew up April 20 and unleashed the nearly three-month-long oil geyser. The issue of the plumes first arose in late May, when BP chief executive Tony Hayward was asked about them in an Associated Press interview. His reply: “What plumes?” Acknowledging the plumes would have amounted to an admission of responsibility, said Larry McKinney, director of the Harte Research Institute at Texas A&M University. And the company’s advantage increases as more time passes, said Tulane’s Davis. “We may all be in this together, but we’re not in this for the same reasons. (BP’s) duty to their shareholders is to make money.” Once the field teams collect their information, BP and the government will analyze the data separately and reach their own conclusions on damages. Even if BP disputes scientists’ findings, the 1990 Oil Spill Pollution act puts the burden of proof on the company in any disputes over liability and how harm is calculated. BP’s obligations go beyond wildlife and habitat to include what’s lost to humans: each visit to the beach denied by oily sands, all the Gulf fishing trips that will never be taken. Back along the coast, where a steady parade of boats were being loaded with cleanup workers, Venice, La., charter boat fisherman Peter Young scoffed at the effort to track the damage. “They’re basically spitting in the wind,” he said.

Read the full article →

BP Oil Spill: Off Death Watch, BP’s Future Still Open Question

July 18, 2010

NEW YORK — The future of BP PLC has shifted in recent days from a death-watch discussion to a debate about how valuable the British oil giant will be after it finishes paying for the worst offshore oil spill in U.S. history. BP gained temporary control of its broken well in the Gulf of Mexico on Thursday and is counting on shutting it off permanently within weeks. Its shares have regained more than a quarter of the value lost in the wake of the April 20 explosion on the Deepwater Horizon drilling rig. Talk of a possible bankruptcy or takeover of the company has mostly faded. But the company still faces the daunting task of paying huge government fines and royalty payments, cleanup costs, damage claims and legal expenses for years. Analysts estimate BP’s final tab for the Gulf oil spill will be anywhere from $50 billion to $100 billion. Many analysts feel BP can cover the costs if they’re spread out over years or even decades. But others don’t like the uncertainty. They note that the asset sales needed to offset at least part of those costs will likely make it a smaller company with reduced cash flow. “We still don’t have any way of gauging” how much BP could eventually spend on the spill, Macquarie Research analyst Jason Gammel said. “We’re certainly not buying the stock.” Others are more encouraged. “People are relatively optimistic about the situation for the first time since this started,” said Dougie Youngson, an analyst with Arbuthnot Securities in London. BP shares traded in the U.S. were worth $60.48 on April 20, hours before the explosion of the drilling rig triggered the oil spill. They then spiraled downward to as low as $26.75 during trading on June 28. That slide wiped out $105 billion in market capitalization. The stock began to rebound this month as details emerged about the possible sale of $10 billion or more in assets to help cover BP’s liabilities. The temporary capping of the well helped send the stock 9 percent higher last week to $37.10. BP promised the Obama administration it will set aside $20 billion over four years to pay spill-related claims along the Gulf and has spent $3.5 billion so far. But beyond that, BP says “it is too early to quantify other potential costs and liabilities associated with the incident.” Those include: _ Possible civil fines of up to $1,000 for every barrel of oil spilled. With the government’s estimate of the spill ranging from 2.15 million to 4.3 million barrels, the fine could be from $2.15 billion to $4.3 billion. _ The government also wants BP to pay royalties at a rate of 18.75 percent on the oil it collected from the well. BP put that figure at 826,800 barrels. However, the company could also owe royalties on the oil spillled into the Gulf if investigators determine that the spill was the result of BP’s negligence. _ BP has vowed to stay in the Gulf until the oil is cleaned up, which will take years. It’s hired thousands of people to clean beaches and marshes and skim oil off the water. It also has to pay cleanup costs incurred by the government. _ Anadarko Petroleum Corp. and MOEX LLC, BP’s partners in the blown-out well, are contractually obligated to pay 25 percent and 10 percent of the costs, respectively. But they have refused to pay BP’s initial bills totaling $388 million because they claim BP was negligent in its management of the well. _ The biggest wild card is legal liabilities. Lawsuits have been filed on behalf of workers who died or were injured in the blast, as well as local businessmen, shareholders and employees. Analysts estimate BP’s operations will generate about $30 billion in cash this year if oil prices hold steady. BP recently cut back capital spending to around $18 billion, so that leaves about $12 billion in free cash. Normally, dividends totaling $10.6 billion would come out of that, but BP suspended dividend payments in June. BP also has another $5 billion in cash, plus a $15 billion credit line. Adding in potential asset sales, that means BP will have as much as $30 billion available for paying penalties and other liabilities. The company’s debt level stood at about $32.15 billion at March 31. It has talked to banks about borrowing more money if needed. Even if BP sells some assets, it’s likely to remain one of the largest non-government-owned oil companies in the world. Just how big? The high-end estimate of around 4 million barrels spilled in the Gulf amounts to no more than one day’s output from BP’s vast global operations. If BP can continue to get between $70 and $75 a barrel for the oil it produces, analysts believe its cash flow will remain sufficient to cover its Gulf liabilities. That doesn’t mean people pressing claims against BP have to root for higher prices, but the reality is that a sharp drop in oil could put them at risk. West Texas Intermediate crude, the light oil that is the benchmark for global prices, is trading at around $76 a barrel. Brent crude, which is found in the North Sea among other areas, is priced around $75.40. The company’s financial condition will become clearer when BP reports results for the second quarter on July 27. There’s a chance it will announce the sale of assets at that time. Published reports have suggested the company is talking with Apache Corp. about selling a stake in the Prudhoe Bay oil field in Alaska, but BP has declined to disclose specifics. Youngson, the Arbuthnot analyst, said a sale to Apache would fit with BP’s plan to sell assets that don’t affect the company’s long-term growth, a strategy it had before the Gulf spill. It also would make sense politically, he added. Another candidate for a sale is BP’s 60 percent stake in Argentine Pan American, an Argentine oil and gas producer that also has operations in Bolivia and Chile. Analysts estimate the stake is worth about $9 billion. Oppenheimer & Co. analyst Fadel Gheit said BP doesn’t need to sell assets now, but the company is digging in for years of damage claims. “Eventually they know they’re going to have to sell something,” he said. “It’s not if, but when.” __ Wardell reported from London. AP Reporter Jennifer Quinn contributed to this report.

Read the full article →

BioLargo Adds Dr. Vikram Rao, Former Halliburton CTO, to Its Team

July 13, 2010

LA MIRADA, CA–(Marketwire – July 13, 2010) –  BioLargo, Inc. ( OTCBB : BLGO ) announced today that former Halliburton Chief Technology Officer, Dr. Vikram Rao , has joined the BioLargo management team as a senior advisor. Rao will work closely with BioLargo to help capitalize on opportunities to commercialize its technology in the water and energy fields.

Read the full article →

Halleman Joins Parsons as Vice President, Business Development Water & Infrastructure

July 6, 2010

PASADENA, CA–(Marketwire – July 6, 2010) –  Parsons is pleased to announce that Mark A. Halleman has joined the company as Vice President, Business Development, for its Water & Infrastructure group. In this capacity, he will be responsible for not only developing the East Division’s project and program leads but will oversee the pursuit of large water projects.

Read the full article →

Gulf Oil Spill Cost Now $3 Billion

July 5, 2010

NEW ORLEANS (AP) — BP’s costs for the disastrous Gulf of Mexico oil spill climbed nearly half a billion dollars in the past week, raising the oil giant’s tab to just over $3 billion for work on cleaning and capping the gusher and payouts to individuals, businesses and governments. London-based BP PLC, the largest oil and gas producer in the Gulf, released its latest tally of response costs Monday. The total of $3.12 billion was up from $2.65 billion a week earlier. The figure does not include a $20 billion fund for Gulf damages BP created last month. As BP continued drilling relief wells that are the best hope for plugging the blown-out well, a giant new oil skimming vessel was tested in the Gulf. But lousy weather means it may be longer than first hoped before officials know if it can work full-time sucking crude from the sea. The Taiwanese skimmer dubbed “A Whale” has been able to show off its maneuverability during a weekend test in a 25-mile-square patch of water just north of the site where an April 20 explosion on the Deepwater Horizon killed 11 workers and started the worst oil spill in Gulf history. TMT, the shipping firm that owns the vessel, had hoped to test a containment boom system designed to direct greater volumes of oily water into the 12 vents or “jaws” that the ship uses to suck it in, according to spokesman Bob Grantham. But lingering bad weather in the form of stiff winds and choppy seas has made that impossible, and prevented a flotilla of smaller skimmers from working offshore along the coasts of Alabama, Mississippi and Florida. “As was the case yesterday, the sea state, with waves at times in excess of 10 feet, is not permitting optimal testing conditions,” Grantham said in an e-mail Sunday. The skimmers, which have been idle off the coasts since a spell of bad weather last week kicked up by Hurricane Alex, were on the water along the Louisiana coast over the weekend. Officials with the U.S. Coast Guard are waiting for the weather to improve before sending them out elsewhere. “We’ve got our guys out there and they’re docked and ready, but safety is a huge concern for us, especially with the smaller vessels,” said Courtnee Ferguson, a spokeswoman for the Joint Information Command in Mobile, Ala. On Sunday, huge barges used to collect oil from skimming vessels were parked at the mouth of Mobile Bay, waiting for conditions to subside as waves rose to about 5 feet high miles offshore. The current spate of bad weather is likely to last well into next week, according to the National Weather Service. “This should remain fairly persistent through the next few days, and maybe get a little worse,” meteorologist Mike Efferson said. On the shore, beach cleanup crews were making progress on new oil that washed up thanks to the high tides generated by last week’s bad weather. In Grand Isle, about 800 people were removing tar balls and liquid oil from seven miles of beach, Coast Guard Cmdr. Randal Ogrydziak said. “In a day or two, you wouldn’t be able to tell the oil was even there,” he said. By Wednesday, Ogrydziak said they should have a machine on the beach that washes sand where the oil washed ashore. Crews have also been working to put containment boom thrown around by the storms back into place, he said. So far, weather has not slowed drilling on two relief wells meant to finally plug the spill. BP officials have said they’re running slightly ahead of schedule on the drilling, but expect weather or other delays. Early to mid-August is still the timeframe for the completion of the drilling. Along with the drilling, the capture and burning of oil and gas at the site of the leaking well has gone on without interruption from the weather. But the choppy seas have delayed the operation of another vessel that officials say will roughly double the amount of oil being collected or burned. The Helix Producer is supposed to connect with the leaking well by a flexible hose that will help it disconnect and reconnect quickly if a hurricane or other major storm forces an evacuation of the site. Coast Guard officials say they’re hoping to have the Helix Producer connected to the well and collecting oil by Wednesday.

Read the full article →

theGrio: BP’s New, Black Gulf Representative Talks Damage Control

June 30, 2010

Darryl Willis has recently emerged as the public face of BP. He is the VP of Resources for BP America and in charge of handling the legion of damage claims pouring into the oil company. This became glaringly apparent when a solemn, studious, and very sincere appearing Willis stared into a camera and declared that “I’ll be here in the Gulf for as long as it takes to get it right.” This is precisely what many believe BP’s gaffe-prone, CEO Tony Hayward couldn’t do. The ensuing commercial has become ubiquitous on television with Willis trying to assure that though BP can’t wipe away its horror of the past two months , it’s doing everything to make amends and that includes shelling out tens of millions to those hurt by the spill . A native of New Orleans, a geophysicist by profession, 20 years as a middle ranking BP executive, and lacking a British accent, Willis seems the ideal person to lead BP’s new PR offensive. But can he work miracles for BP and make things right in the Gulf? Is Willis’s rise to the top a cynical, play of the race card by a company that’s been hammered for its environmental and economic destruction , ineptness, public insensitivity, and dodges and evasions ? The skepticism about Willis and his actual role in BP damage control is a legitimate point of debate, and derision, by some African-Americans. But Willis makes clear that he’s no smiling face front man for the company and ticks off facts to back up the claim that he and BP will do what it takes to as he repeatedly told me “to make it right.” Willis tells much more in this theGrio exclusive. You be the judge. theGrio: What is the attitude of African-American fishermen, hotel and restaurant workers and owners in the Gulf that have been affected by the spill toward BP? Darryl Willis: I was at a town hall in Port Sulphur, a town north of Venice, Louisiana. It was a heated town hall. The participants were mostly African-American. They were concerned about being included in the settlement and the claims process. They also expressed concern about getting back to work, getting their boats back in the water. It was an opportunity for me to connect with the folks in the Gulf affected by the spill. It was an opportunity for me to make sure that we’re tapping into communities in a positive way. The key thing that we have to do is to keep listening to people. But there is frustration on the part of many African-Americans. Is there a sense among African-Americans in the region that they’re being excluded from the settlement and claims process? I don’t get that sense. However, African-Americans do want to be more visible in the process. But African-American claimants are walking into the claims centers with their documentation and leaving with payments for the damages. That gives me a sense of ease. But we want to engage local persons and businesses in the clean-up , repair process. How deeply affected were African-Americans by the spill? It has had a deep effect on those involved in the oyster, shrimp, and crab and the fisheries. The fact that they can’t get out on the water and make a living is where the frustration comes in. They thank BP for the checks. But they still want to get back to work and make a living. The best thing they say for us is to clean up the spill so we can get back out on the water. Have you been personally involved in the escrow fund set up negotiations? And how does it actually work? My talks have been with Kenneth Feinberg, President Obama’s appointed Oil Fund overseer. We’ve talked about distributing the payments . We’ve talked about how to make the process more efficient, speedy and transparent to local individuals and business claimants as well as transparent to local, state and federal agencies. We’ve talked about how to make the way we act with the community more consistent across the Gulf Coast. Ken said this is the first time that he’s gotten involved in a claims process that’s up and running. We’ve opened up 45 offices, written 40,000 checks, and paid out $130 million in claims. It takes 4 days on average for a claimant to get a check. For businesses, it’s taken 8 days. There’s still much skepticism about BP’s intentions and efforts? The proof is in the pudding. Since June 1 we’ve paid out $90 million in claims. Anyone who doesn’t believe that we’re trying to assist those that have been damaged by the spill we invite them to look at the data. When I got involved we had 7 adjusters. We now have more than 1000 adjusters, 170 phone answerers, and it takes six seconds to answer a call. We’re not perfect. But we’re trying hard to meet the needs of the people of the region. And we’re not afraid to write big checks . Is there a timetable for completing the claims and settlement process? There’s no timetable. As long as the oil spills there will be claims and we’ll pay them. How closely is the Obama administration monitoring the BP settlement and claims process? It’s being handled independent of BP and the government. We make daily reports to the Coast Guard on how many checks have been written, claims filed, phone calls received, and the average time for the pay-outs . You’ve emerged as the new face of BP. Who is Darryl Willis? I’m from New Orleans. I went to college and graduate school there. I went to work for BP 20 years ago as a geophysicist. When I was asked to play a part in the process I was determined to assert myself in how it was handled. I understand the pain and frustration of the spill and how it’s going to impact the folks in the Gulf Coast. I wanted to see that it would not be encumbered by bureaucratic red tape and as straightforward as one can make it to insure we got the money in their hands. This was personal to me. BP has been criticized for being evasive, denying media access, and not transparent. Will you change that? I will talk with anyone about how we’re trying to pay the claims and fix the problem. We at BP realize that this is an unprecedented spill, and we’re trying to get lots of things right, and we’ve also gotten some things wrong. If we don’t fix the problem and get all the things that we need to get right then we need to be held accountable. Everyone I know is determined to get it right.

Read the full article →

Mary Bottari: Wall Street Reform Bill Could Be a Big Win for the Farm Belt

June 30, 2010

Everyone in America remembers the summer of 2008 when gas prices rose to over $4.00 a gallon. The puzzling price spike caused hardship for many Americans, but it had a disproportionate impact on farmer given that energy costs are one of farmers biggest costs of doing business. A repeat of this scenario not only threatens consumer pocketbooks and farm livelihoods, but could be a serious set back to an already slow economic recovery. That possibility just became much more remote due to some last-minute maneuvers involving the Wall Street reform bill slated to be voted on in Congress this week. The derivatives chapter of the bill specifically cracks down on the energy and food commodity speculation that elevates the cost of farming and socks it to consumers. Congressional reports and the Commodities Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) blamed the 2008 price spikes on rampant food and energy speculation. Chairman Gary Gensler told the U.S. Senate in 2009, “I believe that increased speculation in energy and agricultural products has hurt farmers and consumers.” According to the CFTC, a speculator ”does not produce or use the commodity, but risks his or her own capital trading futures in that commodity in hopes of making a profit on price changes.” Yup, that’s right, the good old boys on Wall Street ramped up the gambling in energy and food commodities when the housing market went bust. They sometimes speculated on regulated exchanges. For instance, Goldman Sachs has a commodity index that helps investors gamble on foods like wheat, cattle, corn as well as natural gas and crude oil. But the real action was in the unregulated, “over the counter” or dark markets. Harper’s Magazine has an incredible story in its July edition exposing how Wall Street speculators bumped up food commodity prices 80 percent between 2005-2008 contributing to hunger domestically and around the world. In a big win for American farmers, consumers and even import-reliant African nations, the Wall Street reform bill winding its way though Congress has unique provisions that apply to food and energy trading. “The final conference report will clamp down on rampant oil and gas speculation which will saves farmers from the type of cost spikes for diesel and fertilizer that occurred in 2008,” said Patrick Woodall of the consumer group Food & Water Watch. He explained that all farms operate as small gas stations for large equipment and that natural gas is a key input into fertilizer. “When speculation is rampant in the energy markets farmers suffer disproportionately.” The bill agreed to by the House-Senate conference committee on financial reform brings this type of speculation out of the shadows and into the light of day. Large Wall Street firms engaged in food and energy derivatives trading will be forced to spin off their derivatives desks into a separately capitalized affiliate, making speculation in these markets much more costly. This spin off provision applies specifically to commodity derivatives and a few other types of trades – advocates lost the fight to make it apply across the board. In addition, all trades will be cleared by regulators and exchange traded where pricing and positions will be transparent. Capital requirements will apply to clearing houses and margin requirements will apply to trades, putting real money behind the bets. Position limits will also apply making it more difficult for a few players to dominate the market. “If used seriously, these are extremely effective policy tools for inhibiting and bursting speculative bubbles,” says economist Robert Pollin who has written about the harm speculative bubbles can cause for developed and developing nations. CFTC chairman Gary Gensler, who supported these reforms, has made it clear he will not hesitate to use these tools. These provisions are geared toward ending Wall Street gambling in these essential markets. At the same time, the bill exempts legitimate end-users of derivatives, like small farmers who want to hedge their bets against possible price jumps in seed and fertilizer. The development of robust transparency in the unregulated derivatives market is very good news for farmers and consumers. The crack-down, which was spearheaded by Senate agriculture committee chair Blanche Lincoln (D-Arkansas) was wisely supported by Senator Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) who bucked his party and voted the reforms out of the Senate agriculture committee. Now its time to get these changes enacted into law. The bill needs the support of other independent-minded farm belt Senators like Richard Lugar (R-Indiana), George Voinovich (R-Ohio) Mike Johanns (Nebraska), John Thune (S.D.) and others. Without one or two votes from this group of Senators the bill may fail, giving Wall Street another whack at weakening it further. Big bank lobbyists are frantically working behind the scenes in a last-ditch effort to kill these particular reforms. Farm belt constituents need to let their Senators know that the last thing they need is pinstriped gamblers jacking up prices in these essential markets.

Read the full article →

Middlesex Water Company Announces Board Change

June 23, 2010

ISELIN, NJ–(Marketwire – June 23, 2010) –  Middlesex Water Company ( NASDAQ : MSEX ) has announced the resignation of John P. Mulkerin from its Board of Directors, effective as of the Board of Directors meeting held June 22, 2010. Mr. Mulkerin was a Class I Director whose term was to expire in May 2012.

Read the full article →

Utah Oil Spill: Chevron Vows To Pay

June 18, 2010

SALT LAKE CITY — Salt Lake City attorneys expect Chevron Corp. will quickly agree to a financial settlement related to last weekend’s pipeline spill that dumped 33,000 gallons of crude oil into city waterways, a spokeswoman for Mayor Ralph Becker said Friday. Becker has vowed to make Chevron pay for the cleanup, and the company has repeatedly pledged to cover the city’s expenses, as well as damage or reimbursement claims from others. A deal could be announced next week, said Lisa Harrison Smith, the mayor’s spokeswoman. “We won’t be satisfied until it’s done,” she said. San Ramon, Calif.-based Chevron believes an improbable series of events led to last Saturday’s spill, which sent crude oil into pristine Red Butte Creek. A short in an overhead 46,000-volt power line traveled to a fence post that acted like an electric arc welder, melting a quarter-size hole in the pipeline, the company said. The bottom of the fence post was anchored just inches above the buried pipeline – an obvious danger that went unnoticed for 30 years, Chevron said. “It would be highly unusual, but it’s a plausible theory,” Rocky Mountain Power spokesman Dave Eskelsen said. Some of the spilled oil traveled in the creek through Salt Lake City to the Jordan River, which drains into the Great Salt Lake. Chevron said it has cleaned up 21,000 of the 33,000 gallons of spilled oil. Much of that has been mopped and vacuumed from city waterways. Absorbent booms on the Jordan River have been capturing traces of oil, and workers were seen digging up oil-soaked soil Wednesday and sucking up residual oil from Red Butte Creek near the spill site. Chevron said it plans to flush the Red Butte Creek with water Saturday to capture residual oil with absorbent booms. It warned residents the flushing could stir up oil fumes for three or four hours. But the latest samples from 13 locations along Red Butte Creek and the Jordan River show no danger to human health or aquatic life, Utah Division of Water Quality officials said. The U.S. Department of Transportation has jurisdiction over oil pipelines and is investigating what caused the spill, said Patricia Klinger, a spokeswoman for the department’s pipeline-safety group. A metallurgist is examining the pipe, she said. The department’s Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration can fine Chevron, but has no authority over Rocky Mountain Power, which owns the nearby fenced compound and power lines near the pipeline, Klinger said. Chevron officials said earlier this week that more than 30 claims had been filed with the oil company. The company is taking full responsibility and expects to get hit with a large amount of bills for damages and expenses, Chevron spokesman Dan Johnson said Friday. “We think that’s appropriate,” he said. “People who pay their bills are trusted.” The Utah Rivers Council on Friday called for Chevron to deposit $15 million into an escrow account to pay for damages and cleanup expenses. But the expected settlement agreement would make an escrow account unnecessary, Smith said.

Read the full article →

Leo W. Gerard: American Wind Turbines Sound Like Freedom

June 18, 2010

The sound that American wind turbines produce as their giant, breeze-propelled blades whip around is a distinctive: Neh-neh-neh-neh-neh-neh . The anticipation is that those energy-generating, whirling arms would create a whooshing sound. And maybe they do in some countries. But here, in America, they echo the almost melodic taunt of a schoolyard victor — Neh-neh-neh-neh-neh-neh: You can’t get me . That’s because American wind turbines are the manifestation of freedom from foreign oil. The more American wind turbines, the fewer barrels of oil America must import to meet its energy needs. And American-built wind turbines help propel the nation out of the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression by generating good-paying American jobs. President Obama talked about the ugly results of the nation’s refusal to solve its dependency problem – its guzzling of 20 percent of the world’s oil while controlling less than two percent of the world’s reserves. America’s combination of oil addiction and lack of adequate oil resources enslaves the nation to foreign sources, often foreign sources hostile to America. A generation ago, former President Jimmy Carter warned of the consequences of this abusive relationship as Iran held 52 Americans hostages and long lines formed at gasoline stations during a season of shortages. Carter installed on the White House roof a symbol of the solution — solar panels. His successor there, Ronald Reagan, pulled them down. And the nation went on its merry way forgetting the once-empty gasoline stations and ignoring its ever-increasing foreign dependency – even as the Exxon Valdez mucked Prince William Sound two months after Reagan left office. Here’s what Obama said about that wasted opportunity: “And for decades, we have failed to act with the sense of urgency that this challenge requires. Time and again, the path forward has been blocked – not only by oil industry lobbyists, but also by a lack of political courage and candor. The consequences of our inaction are now in plain sight. Countries like China are investing in clean energy jobs and industries that should be right here in America. Each day, we send nearly $1 billion of our wealth to foreign countries for their oil. And today, as we look to the Gulf, we see an entire way of life being threatened by a menacing cloud of black crude.” The explosion of the Deep Water Horizon oil rig in the Gulf of Mexico, the deaths of 11 workers, the uncontrolled gushing of more than 50,000 barrels of oil a day into the sea, and the mucking of brown pelicans and four states’ coastlines have given Obama the ability to take up Carter’s righteous clean energy campaign. And Obama accepted the challenge: “The tragedy unfolding on our coast is the most painful and powerful reminder yet that the time to embrace a clean energy future is now. Now is the moment for this generation to embark on a national mission to unleash America’s innovation and seize control of our own destiny.” The president noted that wind turbines are being built in retrofitted factories that were once abandoned right here in America. That happened in Pennsylvania. The wind turbine manufacturer Gamesa converted defunct mills into centers for wind turbine construction. And it cooperated with the United Steelworkers (USW) to provide good-paying union jobs. That is the potential President Obama sees – independence from foreign sources and resurgence of America’s economy. It is the potential that the USW and the American Wind Energy Association (AWEA) pictured when they agreed earlier this month to work together to accelerate development and deployment of wind energy production in the U.S. Like the Steelworkers, the national trade association of America’s wind industry believes the U.S. must move toward renewable energy sources and must construct them itself. U.S. Sen. Sherrod Brown of Ohio explained it simply when the USW and AWEA announced their partnership: “We can’t replace our dependence on foreign oil with a dependence on Chinese-made wind turbines. It’s critical that American manufacturers have the resources to develop and deploy wind energy components. Clean energy will help America regain its leadership in manufacturing. We need to ensure American workers and manufacturers are building the clean energy components that will be used around the world.” Obama called on Americans to “seriously tackle our addiction to fossil fuels.” But like any rehab program, success won’t come easily. Oil companies will continue to lobby against it. Swayed by their money, some politicians will oppose the legislation essential to encourage it. But symbolic solar panels must remain on the White House roof this time. Renewable energy, as Obama said, enables America to shape its own destiny The President urged the nation to free itself from its oil dependency now: “As we recover from this recession, the transition to clean energy has the potential to grow our economy and create millions of jobs – but only if we accelerate that transition. Only if we seize the moment.” This is the time for wind turbines. For solar. For hydro. This is the moment to hear increasing numbers of rotor blades whipping up the sound of independence. Carpe diem.

Read the full article →

Leo W. Gerard: American Wind Turbines Sound Like Freedom

June 18, 2010

The sound that American wind turbines produce as their giant, breeze-propelled blades whip around is a distinctive: Neh-neh-neh-neh-neh-neh . The anticipation is that those energy-generating, whirling arms would create a whooshing sound. And maybe they do in some countries. But here, in America, they echo the almost melodic taunt of a schoolyard victor — Neh-neh-neh-neh-neh-neh: You can’t get me . That’s because American wind turbines are the manifestation of freedom from foreign oil. The more American wind turbines, the fewer barrels of oil America must import to meet its energy needs. And American-built wind turbines help propel the nation out of the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression by generating good-paying American jobs. President Obama talked about the ugly results of the nation’s refusal to solve its dependency problem – its guzzling of 20 percent of the world’s oil while controlling less than two percent of the world’s reserves. America’s combination of oil addiction and lack of adequate oil resources enslaves the nation to foreign sources, often foreign sources hostile to America. A generation ago, former President Jimmy Carter warned of the consequences of this abusive relationship as Iran held 52 Americans hostages and long lines formed at gasoline stations during a season of shortages. Carter installed on the White House roof a symbol of the solution — solar panels. His successor there, Ronald Reagan, pulled them down. And the nation went on its merry way forgetting the once-empty gasoline stations and ignoring its ever-increasing foreign dependency – even as the Exxon Valdez mucked Prince William Sound two months after Reagan left office. Here’s what Obama said about that wasted opportunity: “And for decades, we have failed to act with the sense of urgency that this challenge requires. Time and again, the path forward has been blocked – not only by oil industry lobbyists, but also by a lack of political courage and candor. The consequences of our inaction are now in plain sight. Countries like China are investing in clean energy jobs and industries that should be right here in America. Each day, we send nearly $1 billion of our wealth to foreign countries for their oil. And today, as we look to the Gulf, we see an entire way of life being threatened by a menacing cloud of black crude.” The explosion of the Deep Water Horizon oil rig in the Gulf of Mexico, the deaths of 11 workers, the uncontrolled gushing of more than 50,000 barrels of oil a day into the sea, and the mucking of brown pelicans and four states’ coastlines have given Obama the ability to take up Carter’s righteous clean energy campaign. And Obama accepted the challenge: “The tragedy unfolding on our coast is the most painful and powerful reminder yet that the time to embrace a clean energy future is now. Now is the moment for this generation to embark on a national mission to unleash America’s innovation and seize control of our own destiny.” The president noted that wind turbines are being built in retrofitted factories that were once abandoned right here in America. That happened in Pennsylvania. The wind turbine manufacturer Gamesa converted defunct mills into centers for wind turbine construction. And it cooperated with the United Steelworkers (USW) to provide good-paying union jobs. That is the potential President Obama sees – independence from foreign sources and resurgence of America’s economy. It is the potential that the USW and the American Wind Energy Association (AWEA) pictured when they agreed earlier this month to work together to accelerate development and deployment of wind energy production in the U.S. Like the Steelworkers, the national trade association of America’s wind industry believes the U.S. must move toward renewable energy sources and must construct them itself. U.S. Sen. Sherrod Brown of Ohio explained it simply when the USW and AWEA announced their partnership: “We can’t replace our dependence on foreign oil with a dependence on Chinese-made wind turbines. It’s critical that American manufacturers have the resources to develop and deploy wind energy components. Clean energy will help America regain its leadership in manufacturing. We need to ensure American workers and manufacturers are building the clean energy components that will be used around the world.” Obama called on Americans to “seriously tackle our addiction to fossil fuels.” But like any rehab program, success won’t come easily. Oil companies will continue to lobby against it. Swayed by their money, some politicians will oppose the legislation essential to encourage it. But symbolic solar panels must remain on the White House roof this time. Renewable energy, as Obama said, enables America to shape its own destiny The President urged the nation to free itself from its oil dependency now: “As we recover from this recession, the transition to clean energy has the potential to grow our economy and create millions of jobs – but only if we accelerate that transition. Only if we seize the moment.” This is the time for wind turbines. For solar. For hydro. This is the moment to hear increasing numbers of rotor blades whipping up the sound of independence. Carpe diem.

Read the full article →

Treasury, Geithner to Be Given Expanded Powers in U.S. Financial Overhaul

June 18, 2010

By Ian Katz June 18 (Bloomberg) — The U.S. Treasury Department under Secretary Timothy F. Geithner is coming out of the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression with expanded powers to guard against future threats to financial stability. Geithner, who has managed taxpayer bailouts of companies from Citigroup Inc. to General Motors Co. , would lead a council to monitor large financial firms under legislation House and Senate negotiators aim to complete by July 4. Lawmakers confirmed the council’s basic functions yesterday and may approve final language next week. Geithner would also get a research unit that could demand data from banks and regulators and a new national insurance office. The Treasury-led council’s role includes identifying companies that might be shut down because they pose a risk to the financial system. That authority, even if well-intentioned, could be used for political ends, said Phillip Swagel , a former Treasury economist who’s now a professor at Georgetown University in Washington. “It’s such an open-ended grant of power,” said Swagel, who worked for Republican Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson . “Do we really want to give that to every future administration?” Tom Quaadman , vice president of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce’s Center for Capital Markets Competitiveness, said the legislation will give Treasury “enormous new powers.” The Treasury would also be required to approve any emergency lending by the Federal Reserve. The Fed used its emergency powers during the crisis to rescue American International Group Inc. and Bear Stearns Cos. The Treasury’s new powers are one element of legislation that Geithner has called “the most sweeping financial reform that we’ve considered in generations.” Council Members The council, which also includes the chairmen of the Fed, Securities and Exchange Commission and the FDIC, would have the authority to recommend that the central bank and other agencies toughen rules to reduce risk at financial institutions. Some of its decisions, such as ruling that a non-bank financial company should be subject to Fed supervision, couldn’t be made without the Treasury secretary’s approval. “While it mostly has powers of recommendation, it clearly has the ability to affect regulation and set the agenda,” said Chuck Muckenfuss , a partner at Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP in Washington who specializes in financial regulation and policy. The council would include, as a non-voting member, the director of a new Treasury financial research office. While the office isn’t intended to “snoop on people,” it would have broad power to ask companies for information, Swagel said. Large Banks The office would obtain data and conduct research on systemic risk and require banks with assets of $50 billion or more to give information not otherwise available about its financial condition and internal systems. The success of the research office depends on how its work is used, said Mark Calabria , director of financial regulation studies at the Cato Institute in Washington and a former aide to Republican Senator Richard Shelby of Alabama. “It’s an open question whether the financial research done at Treasury will end up serving the policy goals of the Treasury secretary, or will they actually build a strong, independent function,” Calabria said. Geithner, 48, will be gaining authority after being the target of a public and political backlash over the $700 billion Troubled Asset Relief Program. Lawmakers including Senator Maria Cantwell , a Democrat from Washington state, and Representative Jeb Hensarling , a Texas Republican, said the Treasury favored Wall Street banks over Main Street. Fed Scrutiny As companies including Citigroup and Bank of America Corp. repaid bailout funds last year, the Treasury escaped the ire of lawmakers debating whether to curb central bank’s independence and increase scrutiny of its actions. Lawmakers yesterday agreed to require greater disclosure by the central bank while rejecting a provision to make the New York Fed chief a political appointee. Geithner met with more than a dozen senators in the weeks before the Senate’s May 20 vote and urged them to support the regulatory changes. The Obama administration’s proposal, released in June 2009, included a financial services oversight council to be led by Treasury. “What’s important is to have true accountability for the responsibilities granted to each government agency,” Treasury spokesman Andrew Williams said. The President’s Working Group on Financial Markets, formed in response to the October 1987 stock market crash, is likely to be supplanted by the council, said Eugene A. Ludwig , chief executive officer of Promontory Financial Group and a former comptroller of the currency. The working group, led by the Treasury secretary, includes the chairmen of the Fed, SEC and Commodity Futures Trading Commission. Insurance Office The Treasury’s authority would also be extended to the insurance industry. A proposed National Office of Insurance, whose director would be appointed by the Treasury secretary, will identify regulatory weaknesses that could contribute to an industry crisis and recommend to the council of regulators that an insurer be supervised by the Fed. The legislation falls short of proposing a so-called optional federal charter for insurance companies that allow firms to choose between the current system of state regulation or a federal overseer. Large insurers such as Allstate Corp. have supported an optional federal supervision while smaller firms and states oppose it. “This is the first toe in the water for federal government into insurance,” said Robert Litan , a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution and a former Office of Management and Budget official. “It could prepare the ground for an optional federal charter.” Inspectors Under the legislation, the Treasury’s inspector general, or internal investigator, would lead a council of IGs from government agencies to share information that could improve financial oversight. “The Treasury Department has been one of the primary battalions in our economic army,” Ludwig said. “In times of war the army grows in strength and authority. The question is, how will this army change in times of peace, or what it will evolve into.” To contact the reporter on this story: Ian Katz in Washington at ikatz2@bloomberg.net .

Read the full article →