world-economic

Huffington Post…

The world economic recovery is gaining strength, but it remains unbalanced. Three numbers tell the story. We expect the world economy to grow at about 4.5 percent a year in both 2011 and 2012, but with advanced economies growing at only 2.5 percent, while emerging and developing economies grow at a much higher 6.5 percent. On the good news side. Earlier fears of a double dip–which we did not share–have not materialized. The main worry was that, in advanced economies, after an initial recovery driven by the inventory cycle and fiscal stimulus, growth would fizzle. The inventory cycle is now largely over, fiscal stimulus has turned to fiscal consolidation, but private demand has, for the most part, taken up the relay. Fears have turned to commodity prices. Commodity prices have increased more than expected, reflecting a combination of strong demand growth and a number of supply shocks. These increases conjure the specter of 1970s style stagflation, but they appear unlikely to derail the recovery. In advanced countries, the decreasing share of oil , the disappearance of wage indexation, and the anchoring of inflation expectations, all combine to suggest small effects on either growth or core inflation. The challenge is greater in emerging market and developing countries, where the share of food in consumption is larger, and the credibility of monetary policy is often weaker. Inflation may well be higher for some time but, as our forecasts indicate, we do not expect a major adverse effect on growth. Turning to the bad news. The recovery, however, remains unbalanced. In most advanced economies, output is still far below potential. Unemployment is high, and low growth implies that it will remain so for many years to come. The source of low growth can be traced to both pre-crisis excesses and to crisis wounds. In many countries, especially in the United States, the housing market is still depressed, leading to anemic housing investment. The crisis itself has led to a large deterioration in fiscal positions, forcing a shift to fiscal consolidation, while not eliminating market worries about fiscal sustainability. And, in many countries, banks are struggling to achieve higher capital ratios in the face of increasing non-performing loans. The problems in Europe’s periphery–with the combined effects of low growth, fiscal woes, and financial pressures–are particularly acute. Reestablishing fiscal and financial sustainability, in the face of low or negative growth and high interest rates, is a substantial challenge, and will take time. And, while they are extreme, the problems of Europe’s periphery point to a more general problem, an underlying low rate of growth of potential output. Adjustment is very hard when growth is very low. The policy advice to advanced countries remains largely the same as in previous World Economic Outlooks , and so far, has been only partly heeded. Increased clarity on banks’ exposures with ready recapitalization plans if and where needed. Smart fiscal consolidation, that is neither too fast, which could kill growth, nor too slow, which would kill credibility. The redesign of financial regulation and supervision. And, especially in Europe, an increased focus on reforms to increase potential growth. In emerging market countries by contrast, the crisis has not left lasting wounds. Their fiscal and financial positions were typically stronger to start, and adverse effects of the crisis have been more muted. High underlying growth and low interest rates are making fiscal adjustment much easier. Exports have largely recovered, and whatever shortfall in external demand they experienced has typically been made up through an increase in domestic demand. Capital outflows have turned into capital inflows, due to both better growth prospects and higher interest rates than in advanced countries. The challenge for most emerging countries is quite different from that of advanced countries, namely how to avoid overheating in the face of closing output gaps and higher capital flows. Their response should be twofold. First, rely on a combination of higher interest rates and fiscal consolidation to maintain output at potential. Second, use a mix of reserve accumulation and macroprudential tools , including, where needed, capital controls , to avoid increases in systemic risk stemming from inflows. Countries are often tempted to resist the exchange rate appreciation which is likely to come with higher interest rates and higher inflows. But appreciation increases real income, is part of the desirable adjustment, and should not be resisted. Overall, the macroeconomic policy agenda for the world economy remains the same, but with the passage of time, more urgent. For the recovery to be sustained, advanced countries must reduce government deficits and debt levels. To do so and to maintain growth, they need to rely more on external demand. Symmetrically, emerging market countries must rely less on external demand, and more on domestic demand. Appreciation of emerging market countries’ currencies relative to advanced countries’ currencies is an important key to this global adjustment. The need for careful design of policies at the national level, and coordination at the global level, may be as important today as they were at the peak of the crisis two years ago. From iMFdirect blog

Read the rest here:
Olivier Blanchard: Global Recovery Strengthens, Tensions Heighten

Find our Weekly Commercial Real Estate, Private Equity and Fund Newsletters at www.WeeklyBrief.net

{ 0 comments }

Huffington Post…

MOSCOW — President Dmitry Medvedev has held talks with Goldman Sachs chief Lloyd Blankfein about the bank’s possible participation in a direct investment fund the Kremlin is looking to create to attract foreign capital. The Kremlin said Blankfein visited Medvedev on Tuesday to discuss the idea of a fund, which Medvedev first raised at the World Economic Forum in Davos in January. There was no other information on the meeting, the size of the possible fund, or when it would be introduced. Goldman Sachs couldn’t be reached for comment. Russia suffers from chronic underinvestment, prompting its leaders to frequently advertise the country as a haven for foreign capital. Would-be investors regularly point to persistent corruption and impenetrable bureaucracy as reasons they look elsewhere.

Read more from the original source:
Goldman Sachs Considers Helping Russia Attract Foreign Capital

Find our Weekly Commercial Real Estate, Private Equity and Fund Newsletters at www.WeeklyBrief.net

{ 0 comments }

Tim Geithner’s Gamble

February 26, 2011

LOS ANGELES — In a recent interview, United States Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner laid out his view of the nature of world economic growth and the role of the US financial sector. It is a deeply disturbing vision, one that amounts to a huge, uninformed gamble with the future of the American economy — and that suggests that Geithner remains the senior public official worldwide who is most in thrall to the self-serving ideology of big banks.

Read the full article →

Yvette Kantrow: Access Davos

February 13, 2011

Filled with self-styled straight shooters who claim to be beholden to no one, the blogosphere has long positioned itself as an antidote to the so-called access journalism racking the mainstream media, most infamously during the run-up to the Iraq War and, more recently, in the run-up to the financial crisis. Because they rely heavily on high-level, establishment sources for their stories, the argument goes, mainstream journos — think Judith Miller — must censor their own reporting or risk losing access to the machers in the corridors of power. The blogosphere, with its emphasis on commentary, analysis and citizen journalism, claims to be unfettered by such restraints. After all, people don’t visit blogs to read worked-over quotes by a CEO or a government official. Against that backdrop, it’s pretty weird to witness the growing army of bloggers who now flock to the World Economic Forum in Davos, the ne plus ultra of access journalism. Bloggy new-media types like Arianna Huffington and Jeff Jarvis have been schlepping to Switzerland for years, and they have more recently been joined by financial bloggers, including Business Insider’s Henry Blodget and Reuters’ Felix Salmon. Then there are the big media outlets including The New York Times , Time Inc. and CNBC, which conduct interviews with bigwig attendees from the mountaintop. Indeed, Davos seems tailor-made for access-obsessed CNBC, which specializes in providing a friendly forum for CEOs and other muckety-mucks to talk directly to viewers. But what of Salmon, Blodget and their ilk? What do they get from a conference where most of the “real” action takes place behind closed doors while reporters lurk in hallways or at parties hoping to nab a few moments with a Big Name attendee? Faced with this reality, bloggers employed a different strategy in Switzerland this year: They went to Davos not to cover it, but to mock it. Blodget, who vowed to give his readers ” The Truth About Davos ,” judged it to be “just like high school.” Salmon declared: “Just about everything in Davos is ridiculous in its own way. It’s like Disneyland.” And Harvard Business Review’s Justin Fox, in his ” Obligatory Pre-Davos Post! ,” admitted that when he was blogging for Time.com “traffic fell off markedly as soon as I started posting from the Swiss Alps… There’s seldom much in the way of news generated at Davos, and most people aren’t itching to hear a soundbite from CEO or government official rushing between meetings.” That message wasn’t lost on Timesman Andrew Ross Sorkin, who in a conference missive outed the high cost of being a Davos Man (as much as $622,000, depending on the size of your entourage). Sorkin’s piece was hailed as a standout by the New Yorker’s John Cassidy, who was not at Davos, while Blodget told readers that everyone at the event was talking about it. That’s nice, but the story seemed a tad hypocritical, given the Times ‘ symbiotic relationship with Davos. Arthur Sulzberger Jr. was at the confab, as were Thomas Friedman and Nicholas Kristof — Davos Men of the highest order — plus Sorkin and other Times scribes who were covering it. How much the cash-strapped New York Times Co. spends to have them there Sorkin’s piece did not say. Perhaps that’s because Sorkin is on his way to becoming a Davos Man himself — Blodget blogged that Sorkin is “a god” around Davos “and quite possibly the first one invited to every party.” And why would a god want to anger his people? But Sorkin’s piece was indicative of the type of snark that the media, particularly the new media, brought with it to Davos this year: sharp-tongued enough to protect itself against charges of being too cozy with the global elite, but soft enough to ensure that its authors will get invited back. Despite all the negative coverage, few journos, including bloggers, seem able to resist the invitation and the proximity to power. Indeed, after spending a few days at the conference, Blodget gave its corporate attendees a big wet kiss, concluding that for executives, the business meetings they conduct at Davos “can end up being vastly more valuable than the price of admission.” OK, fine, but if Davos is nothing more than a big networking event, doesn’t that make all the Big Thoughts a farce? In the blogosphere, only Salmon seems to have stuck to his guns and left the confab as disgusted by it as when he arrived. Moving from snark to satire, he lauded Davos for “deftly leveraging the talk around its chosen theme — ‘shared norms for the new reality’ — into an effective and timely intervention in Egypt.” Well done. But whether that conclusion required a trip to Switzerland is another question.

Read the full article →

Carol Realini: Davos Hot Topic — Inclusive Growth Through Mobile Banking

January 31, 2011

A key theme at this World Economic Forum is inclusive growth. What does that really mean, and why is it important? It means that when developing countries and emerging markets experience growth, the poor people in those countries should participate and benefit. For example, India has 300 million people who are participating in the strong growth that is underway. Their incomes are growing; their wealth is increasing; and the environment they live in is improving. But, the lives of the remaining 700 million people in India are basically unchanged. Inclusive growth means the 700 million will also experience the benefits of growth versus being left out. Most people reading this blog will have trouble visualizing a life without banking. A poor person in India or Africa can live more than eight hours or more from a bank branch, so keeping money in a bank is both inconvenient and impractical. As a result, they pay for everything in cash and are always paid for work or services in cash. This can make paying for essentials inconvenient and expensive. Just paying bills can involve travel and long queue times. If family members live or work in another place, sending or receiving money can be inconvenient and expensive, too. So people who have the greatest need, have the greatest cost. Today, there are more five billion mobile phones in the world, but only 1.6 billion bank accounts. This creates an unprecedented opportunity to use mobile access to bridge this gap by providing affordable financial services to people with a mobile phone who are currently underserved by traditional banking. This is my passion, this is my company’s mission. Affordable financial services will empower their life and work. Globally, the number of mobile banking users is expected to surge more than sixteenfold, to 894 million by 2015, according to Berg Insight, an industry research firm based in Stockholm. That’s up from 55 million in 2009. So the majority of mobile banking customers in 2015 — 78 percent, or 697 million people — are in Asia, Africa, the Middle East and Latin America. Many of those 697 million people will have previously had little or no access to banking. My personal passion is to see these numbers higher in 2015 — I’d like to see 400 million mobile bank accounts in India alone. The desire and building blocks are in place. Getting it done will take hard work — not rocket science, but complex execution is required. Scale will come from investment and collaboration. Those of us who have worked throughout the world on mobile banking have seen firsthand the importance of strong partnerships and other critical success factors. This year at Davos, I was impressed with the new awareness of the potential power, business opportunity, and social mandate to make banking available to all mobile users. In many sessions the topic was inserted. Sessions focused on mobile financial services, were well-attended and the energy level was high. I’m sure that this interest level will translate into increased market momentum for solutions. The only discouraging note came from an undercurrent of fragmentation — too many players thinking they can do this as an independent provider, and not being part of a larger ecosystem. This will hamper growth and stunt value. It won’t be visible in the first wave, but the ceiling will exist because fragmentation lowers value and creates market confusion. We saw this when computers were connected in groups, but not in one global network, when bank ATMs only supported one bank and not all banks. Adoption happened, but plateaus happened that could only be addressed by an open interoperable model. Closed, non-interoperable systems mean fewer participants; fewer users; fewer uses; and far less value. Those who know me know I am a very passionate, optimistic person. So, it’s no surprise that I leave Davos more optimistic than when I arrived. The awareness, investment, and momentum of mobile banking is building. The early part of most new implementations will still take longer than we want to scale, but growth after the tipping point will be much faster than expected. This makes the possibility of banking for all a real possibility for the world. Not so hard to believe, since we are so close to achieving universal communication with those 5 billion+ mobile phones.

Read the full article →

Aron Cramer: Davos 2011: Welcome to the World of the "G-Everybody"

January 30, 2011

In Davos this past week, there was much talk of the “G-Zero” world. This stands in stark contrast to last year’s event, when all the talk was about the “G-2,” or the United States and China as the de facto world leaders. The thinking behind the “G-Zero” is that neither those two nations, nor any others, are providing leadership on topics ranging from climate change to economic recovery to security in Asia. Those advancing the “G-Zero” theory are claiming that the international community is, in effect, leaderless. In my view, this logic is precisely backwards. In fact, whether on the streets of Cairo or in the meeting rooms in Davos, we are in fact seeing the emergence of a world led by the “G-Everybody,” with leadership coming from an unprecedented number of sources. Examples of this abounded in Davos. Based solely on meetings I participated in (with 2,500+ attendees mixing over five days, one person can’t be everywhere), the spirit of productive partnerships was in strong evidence. A coalition of companies joined with the UN Global Compact and the WWF to launch “Windmade,” the first product label providing consumers with the ability to find and purchase products made with wind energy. A group of consumer product companies discussed plans to work jointly with governments over the coming year to develop innovative policy solutions promoting more sustainable consumption models. And the World Economic Forum itself is exploring the creation of guidance for multi-stakeholder partnerships to help them go to scale and deliver results. All this was happening against the backdrop of the events in Tunisia and Egypt. These latest examples of what used to be called “people power” reinforce one of the most central realities of our times: power and influence are distributed more widely than ever before. The theme of Davos this year was “Shared Norms for the New Reality.” Within the halls of the Congress Centre, where the meeting takes place, I spoke to a lot of people who questioned whether there are in fact “Shared Norms” shaping the world in 2011. And indeed, if we look to a small group of governments, whether a G-20, a G-8, G-2, or G-Zero, to dictate these norms for the rest of us, shared norms are hard to find. But if we look more widely, shared norms are in fact emerging. Our thinking, our communication, and our social organization are being shaped today by distributed power. Welcome to the world of the “G-everybody,” where our information, perspectives and influence come from more sources than we can possibly count. This is our new reality.

Read the full article →

Specter Of Currency War Rears Its Head At Davos

January 29, 2011

DAVOS, Switzerland — A fight is looming between rich and poor countries over the value of the dollar and other key currencies, as governments use monetary tricks to boost their national recovery at the expense of other nations, political and business leaders warned Saturday. Washington has been leaning hard on Beijing to allow the Chinese renminbi to rise, saying it is being kept artificially cheap to maintain China’s cheap labor advantage. At the same time the United States, Britain and others have encouraged their central banks to pump money into the system as a means of stimulating the economy. “We are going to see the recovery of nationalism and protectionism, I think we’re going to face some type of currency war,” said Jose Sergio Gabrielli de Azevedo, president and CEO of Brazilian oil giant Petrobras. “The U.S. is going to try to use weak dollar policy to help recovery in the U.S., and Brazil, India are not going to accept that and will fight back, and then we’re going to see some struggle and conflicts,” he said. His words echoed concerns expressed by many participants of the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, this week, where ways to maintain the fragile global recovery – and risks to it – are being hotly debated. Ministers for Germany and France said the euro, and the 17 countries that use it, should be not be short changed by financial markets and that any future shocks to the common currency were unlikely. “I think the euro will be stable,” German Finance Minister Wolfgang Schaeuble said. Christine Lagarde, France’s economy minister said “I think the euro zone has turned a corner. Let’s not short Europe and let’s not short the euro zone.” Australian Foreign Minister Kevin Rudd, responding to a Chinese participant’s defense of China’s currency policies, said, “A few of the rest of us would say a better approach is the appreciation of the renminbi.” Beijing has been wary of letting go control of its currency even as food prices rises are driving up inflation – a situation that has been partly blamed for spurring anti-government protests in the Middle East this week. Rudd said the world has huge concerns about how China will deal with its inflation, and urged Beijing to “get the exchange rate right.” Concerns about where the renminbi, dollar and in particular the euro are heading were aired as more than two dozen senior officials from key economies met in Davos to discuss sending a political signal that a new global trade deal can be completed this year. Thailand’s prime minister said Saturday that failure to conclude the so-called Doha round of trade talks, which have been nearly 10 years in the making, indicated a leadership vacuum on the global stage. “Despite what global leaders say, they are still very much dictated by domestic politics,” Abhisit Vejjajiva told a panel. Renewed talk of a deal – which some say could add billions to the world economy – has won backing from leaders and executives at the World Economic Forum this week. German Chancellor Angela Merkel and British Prime Minister David Cameron cited it as a key test for the international community’s ability to cooperate in reviving the world economy. “We are literally meters away from the finishing line,” Merkel said Friday. Experts remain skeptical that a deal can be reached this year, mainly because China and the United States remain at loggerheads on key issues. Pushing the talks into 2012 – a U.S. presidential election year – would make a conclusion even less likely because the sensitive issue of trade would be a hard sell for politicians of any stripe. But Pascal Lamy, head of the World Trade Organization, said the talks at Davos were “very constructive. The ministers gave a strong signal.” Johann N. Schneider-Ammann, Switzerland’s economy minister, said that there was “a sense that we are in the end game and that if Doha is done, it needs to be done this year.” China’s growth and worries about Europe’s debts have been another focus of attention among the 2,500 business and political leaders discussing the state of the world economy this week. ___ Online: http://www.weforum.org ___ Angela Charlton and Tomislav Skaro contributed to this report.

Read the full article →

Video: Kerry Urges Egypt to Respect the Democratic Process

January 28, 2011

Jan. 28 (Bloomberg) — U.S. Senator John Kerry, a Massachusetts Democrat, talks with Bloomberg’s Olivia Sterns at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, about the unrest in Egypt. Protesters demonstrated throughout Egypt with clashes erupting in central Cairo, in the biggest challenge to President Hosni Mubarak’s 30-year rule. (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Video: Porter Says Companies Missing Chance to Create Value

January 28, 2011

Jan. 28 (Bloomberg) — Michael Porter, a professor at Harvard Business School, talks about corporate strategy and the need for companies to address social issues. Porter talks with Tom Keene at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, on Bloomberg Television’s “Surveillance Midday.” (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Video: Dimon Says Regulation Needs to Be More Intelligent

January 28, 2011

Jan. 28 (Bloomberg) — Jamie Dimon, chief executive officer of JPMorgan Chase & Co., discusses financial regulation and the need for fiscal discipline in the U.S. Dimon speaks with Erik Schatzker on Bloomberg Television’s “InBusiness” at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland. (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Video: Carney Says Canadian Dollar `Strength’ Threatens Growth

January 28, 2011

Jan. 28 (Bloomberg) — Bank of Canada Governor Mark Carney talks about the risk to growth from his country’s currency and the impact of rising food prices. Carney also discusses Canadian monetary and fiscal policy. He speaks with Bloomberg Television’s Erik Schatzker at the World Economic Forum meeting in Davos, Switzerland.

Read the full article →

Video: Accel’s Breyer Says He Wouldn’t Take LinkedIn Public Now

January 28, 2011

Jan. 28 (Bloomberg) — Jim Breyer, managing partner at Accel Partners, discusses LinkedIn Corp.’s plan to raise as much as $175 million in what’s likely to be the first public offering for a major U.S. social-networking site. Breyer, speaking with Erik Schatzker at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, also talks about Facebook Inc.’s valuation and the outlook for Google Inc. (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Video: Blair Says U.K. Must Cut Deficit Without Choking Economy

January 28, 2011

Jan. 28 (Bloomberg) — Former U.K. Prime Minister Tony Blair talks about Britian’s deficit cuts and the Middle East peace process. Blair also discusses banking regulation and the health of Nelson Mandela. He speaks with Andrea Catherwood and Bloomberg Television’s “The Pulse” from the World Economic Forum meeting in Davos, Switzerland.

Read the full article →

Video: Gogel Says Clayton Dubilier May Hold 2 or 3 IPOs in 2011

January 28, 2011

Jan. 28 (Bloomberg) — Donald Gogel, chief executive officer of Clayton Dubilier & Rice LLC, discusses the private equity market. Gogel speaks with Erik Schatzker on Bloomberg Television’s “InsideTrack” at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland. (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Video: Pagliuca Says U.S. Must `Attack’ Deficit to Spur Growth

January 28, 2011

Jan. 28 (Bloomberg) — Stephen Pagliuca, managing director at Bain Capital Partners LP, discusses the U.S. budget deficit and investment strategy. Pagliuca talks with Erik Schatzker on Bloomberg Television’s “InsideTrack” at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland. (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Video: Rogoff Says U.S. Growth `Firming,’ Debt an `Overhang’

January 28, 2011

Jan. 28 (Bloomberg) — Kenneth Rogoff, a professor at Harvard University, and Raghuram Rajan, a professor at the University of Chicago, discuss the outlook for the U.S. and global economies. Rogoff and Rajan speak with Erik Schatzker on Bloomberg Television’s “InsideTrack” at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland. (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Video: Sternlicht Says Starwood `A Little Nervous’ About Rates

January 28, 2011

Jan. 28 (Bloomberg) — Barry Sternlicht, chief executive officer of Starwood Capital Group LLC, discusses the distressed real-estate market. Sternlicht talks with Erik Schatzker on Bloomberg Television’s “InsideTrack” at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland. (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Video: IMF’s Lipsky Says ‘Never Say Never’ to More EU Bailouts

January 28, 2011

Jan. 28 (Bloomberg) — International Monetary Fund First Deputy Managing Director John Lipsky talks about the European debt crisis and the risk of inflation in emerging economies. He speaks with Francine Lacqua on Bloomberg Television’s “The Pulse” from the World Economic Forum meeting in Davos, Switzerland.

Read the full article →

Video: Grimsson Says Iceland Depositor Accord Now `Much Better’

January 28, 2011

Jan. 28 (Bloomberg) — Iceland President Olafur Grimsson talks about changes to the depositor claims accord with the U.K. and Dutch governments stemming from the failure of Landsbanki Islands hf in October 2008. Grimsson also discusses the outlook for a conclusion in the International Monetary Fund’s program in the country. He speaks with Andrea Catherwood on Bloomberg Television’s “The Pulse” from the World Economic Forum meeting in Davos, Switzerland.

Read the full article →

Video: Zoellick Says G-7 Should Have Flexible Exchange Rates

January 28, 2011

Jan. 28 (Bloomberg) — World Bank President Robert Zoellick talks about reserve currencies and exchange rates among the Group of Seven nations. He speaks with Francine Lacqua on Bloomberg Television’s “The Pulse” from the World Economic Forum meeting in Davos, Switzerland.

Read the full article →

Jim Wallis: Values at Davos

January 27, 2011

Yesterday was the first day of the World Economic Forum in Davos, a little mountain village in Switzerland, where each January corporate CEOs, heads of state and leaders of nonprofit organizations from around the globe gather to reflect upon the state of the world. I had been to Davos before the financial crisis of 2008, as part of a group of religious leaders who came to discuss interfaith cooperation, but who also began to dialogue with the other participants at Davos about moral values and the economy. Quite honestly, these conversations about moral values and the economy often felt like an extra-curricular activity, with sessions at 7 a.m. on the third floor. But after the economic crisis hit, our values conversations felt more like a necessity,  and we were quickly moved to prime time in the main hall. At Davos 2008, the World Economic Forum convened a plenary session for all its participants on “Values and the Market.” I was on the panel and said that asking when the crisis will end was the wrong question; the right question was,  how will the crisis change us? Looking out over a huge hall full of business and political leaders (not my usual audience), I suggested that too often people didn’t believe they had to bring virtue and values to bear on economic decisions — that the market would automatically take care of those things. But, as the economic crisis has shown, this was the wrong mentality. The panel caused a buzz, and its questions resonated through that week, leading to many “pastoral” conversations with CEOs who told me they had “lost” some important values. The positive response I felt at Davos eventually led me to write a new book, Rediscovering Values: A Guide for Economic and Moral Recovery . I began to speak at business schools, and found business leaders coming to talk to me like Nicodemus at night. A year later, at Davos 2009, there were 17 sessions with the word “values” in the title. I found myself on a plenary panel with Muhammad Yunus, founder of the Grameen Bank in Bangladesh, addressing the subject of “Rethinking Values in the Post-Crisis World,” and talking about business with a moral purpose — even as a tool for eliminating poverty. But some of us began to feel the danger of just holding values seminars as a response to a devastating economic crisis. Behaviors created this crisis, and unless our values talk led to changed behaviors, it all wouldn’t mean very much. Out of that conference a Global Agenda Council on Values was formed, and I now find myself unexpectedly as its chair. This Council on Values has been given the task of shaping what the World Economic Forum is calling the “Moral Economy Dialogue” — a multi-year process that will develop serious tools for personal, organizational, corporate and national values assessments that focus on changing behaviors. This week at Davos 2011, new metrics like “human flourishing” and “the common good” are being lifted up. Again, I have had many personal conversations with business executives who feel alone in their soul-searching for values. Furthermore, business ethics professors at some of the country’s leading business schools have also told me that their courses are over-subscribed, yet they still feel marginal to the curriculum. All day yesterday, in many of the sessions here at Davos , we wrestled with feeling “stuck” in trying to implement values-change at big corporations and banks. We are now moving from just a conversation on values to a conversation on behavioral change. For example, we had a session yesterday on “Defining Shared Norms.” We spoke of the need for both external regulation and self-regulation; both external accountabilities and the internal moral compass which comes from embedding values in a business . This is all good news to Klaus Schwab, the founder and executive chairman of Davos who, as a young Swiss economist many years ago, wrote about the need for business to not only take into account the interests of shareholders, but also of the many other stakeholders — including employees, consumers, the poor, the environment and future generations. That Davos would take these issues very seriously, and would turn to faith community leaders for help, is good news to me. But the headline in yesterday’s International Herald Tribune — “The Super-Rich Pull Ever Farther Ahead” — indicated we still have a long way to go. Many of those super-rich are at Davos, and I indicated yesterday that the only people whose lives seem to have got back to “normal” since the financial crisis began are those whose behaviors caused it in the first place. They are back to record profits, while a seminar I attended yesterday showed how dramatic and devastating unemployment still is around the globe — especially for young people. But the conversations here lasted far into the night, and I woke up this morning with a full day of more work before us, including one session where I will speak on “Mindful Leadership.” Indeed, leadership — moral leadership — is clearly the issue now, and our session today is already overbooked. And that’s a good sign. I find myself spending time at Davos every year now with an exciting group of about 50 young entrepreneurs called the Young Global Leaders, who are asking some of the most important questions that are before us. The snow keeps falling here, but there are signs and hopes for spring. Jim Wallis is the author of Rediscovering Values: On Wall Street, Main Street, and Your Street — A Moral Compass for the New Economy , and CEO of Sojourners . He blogs at www.godspolitics.com . Follow Jim on Twitter @JimWallis . Click here to get email updates from Jim Wallis

Read the full article →

Dr. Sasha Galbraith: The New Reality — How The Davos Man Is Being Dragged Into The 21st Century

January 27, 2011

The World Economic Forum (WEF) kicked off this week in Davos, Switzerland. And while the world’s biggest “schmooze-fest” usually grabs headlines for its powerful sessions or high-profile participants, this year, the press is enamored with something else: the new quota system , whereby companies are being asked to include a woman among every five delegates. While there’s certainly been a lot of chatter around the new quota system, the reality is that there has been little action. In fact, Zoe Williams of The Guardian reported that women represent only 20 percent of Davos participants — a mere 500 out of the 2500 who attend. And I have to say I’m not all that surprised. After all, sighting a female senior executive in Switzerland is about as rare as seeing a cuckoo, and the changes at Davos seem to be moving about as fast as boardroom reforms in the U.S. But let’s look on the bright side; female participation at WEF is up and big names in business are making this happen — Kraft, Pepsi and DuPont among them. While this is only a drop in the bucket, female participation at this elite event has doubled, which is a great sign. Now for the big questions: Will this trend continue? And will this have an impact beyond WEF? Only time will tell.

Read the full article →

Soros Warns Euro Crisis Could Divide Europe

January 26, 2011

DAVOS, Switzerland — Billionaire financier George Soros warned Wednesday that Europe could potentially fall apart because of the “two-speed Europe” of haves and have-nots that is being perpetuated by the reform of the embattled euro. He told a news briefing on the sidelines of the World Economic Forum that the currency used by 17 EU nations is in the process of reform following concerns over the debt crisis that enveloped Greece and Ireland and is threatening others. Its flaw, he said, of having a common central bank but no common treasury was being addressed with the creation of a permanent European Financial Stability Facility, which was created to bail out debt-ridden countries. But Soros said the reforms are not addressing the euro’s real problem – that the currency has divided the richer EU countries from the poorer ones. “The euro was supposed to bring about convergence, and effectively it created divergence and that is now being perpetuated,” he said. “So you are going forward with this new structure. You’re going to have a two-speed Europe, and that is going to be politically very disruptive.” “That is the unsolved problem that I think needs to be recognized and some solution found because otherwise I think the euro is clearly here to stay. There’s a clear commitment to the euro. But it could put into motion this very divisive political force of two Europes,” Soros warned. “Europe potentially could fall apart because of this two-speed Europe so it needs a solution,” he said. Soros said countries in surplus ought to be investing and expanding more in poorer European countries, but he said Germany, Europe’s largest economy, can’t do it because of very strict constitutional limits. He called for a Europe-wide stimulus that can spur growth in countries that are lagging economically. He noted that “there’s a big push now on continental Europe for a financial transaction tax” which could possibly be used to help these countries as well as for other activities like fighting climate change. Britain, which is neck-and-neck with France for the second-largest economy in the 27-member EU but not part of the euro zone, has embarked on a major austerity program to cut government spending aimed at putting it on sounder economic footing. “I think they may be right in embarking on it,” Soros said when asked about the measures introduced by the coalition government led by Prime Minister David Cameron. “But I think they will probably have the sense that they’ll have to modify it when the effects are felt,” he said, “because I don’t think they can possibly be implemented without pushing the economy into a recession.” Soros said the initial reaction has been “very positive” and the world will be watching to see what happens, “but my expectation is that it will prove to be unsustainable.” As for the broader global economy following the 2008 economic crisis, Soros said, “I think there was a serious danger of a deflationary trap of debt with deflation reinforcing each other, the burden of debt and prices falling.” “This has been successfully fought off, and the balance is now tipping the other way,” he said.

Read the full article →

Don Tapscott: Davos 2011: Davos Becoming a Year-Round Network to Tackle Global Problems

January 26, 2011

Davos, Switzerland — The World Economic Forum is quickly morphing from a once-a-year talkathon into a year-round network of leaders and leading thinkers tackling global problems. Nature hates a vacuum, and the Forum is expanding to fill a void in our systems for global cooperation. It gets people acting constructively, in sharp contrast to the recent failures of other bodies such as the Doha Development Round of the World Trade Organization and the Cancun or Copenhagen Conferences on climate change. It also fills a special role in bringing together the leaders of the Asian “Tiger Countries” into dialogue with the West — something no one else is doing well. We need such networks for dialogue and for launching important initiatives. True, no one “elected” the Forum to try and solve global problems. But increasingly legitimacy flows to those who actually accomplish things and most participants would say that the Forum is doing just that. For example, over the last two years a thousand leading thinkers have been collaborating in 72 so-called Global Agenda Councils, rethinking many aspects of society from poverty to the future of government. One group of legal scholars has a modest little project — rethinking the global legal system, which they argue is “no longer fit for function.” These councils meet several times a year and collaborate between meetings on a global technology platform developed by the Forum. Many of the recommendations from these councils have been implemented by governments and corporations and some important initiatives have been catalyzed. One of these, the Global Risk Response Network to be launched here this week, addresses a new set of emerging risks that threaten the global economy, society and even the very existence of humanity. Failure of the financial system, weapons of mass destruction, new communicable diseases, collapse of environmental systems, water security and 20 other possibilities make the world a volatile place subject to significant and potentially catastrophic risks. Consider something as seemingly mundane as the global supply chain. The vast networks that provide the world with food, clothing, fuel and other necessities could handle an Iceland volcano and one other catastrophe such as the failure of the Panama Canal. But according to experts, a third simultaneous disaster would collapse the system. People around the world would stop getting food and water, leading to unthinkable social unrest. The Risk Network is designed to help corporate, government and civil society leaders better mitigate such risks. The world’s most relevant global decision-makers will be brought together through a community of Risk Officers from top corporations, governments and international organizations. It will draw on insights from the World Economic Forum’s communities and contributors, including expert Forum working groups and a network of the world’s top universities. If a global crisis arises, these leaders could spring to action on a secure network, drawing on insights from any of the Forum’s many communities. More important, rather than just reacting to unanticipated problems like the European sovereign debt crisis, leaders could be more proactive. This approach was informally prototyped during the Haitian earthquake disaster. It wasn’t the United Nations that organized the world’s response to Haiti – it was myriad organizations and individuals that self-organized to save lives and restore order and Haitian society. The informal network of collaborators orchestrated by the Forum was one of these, pointing to the potential of a more disciplined approach. Rather than a typical think tank, the World Economic Forum is becoming a do tank. Don Tapscott recently co-authored Macrowikinomics: Rebooting Business and the World.

Read the full article →

Johann Koss: Davos 2011: Communities of Action to End Extreme Poverty

January 25, 2011

This week in Davos, Switzerland, policy leaders from around the world will convene amidst a range of profound undercurrents that are redefining many tenets of global cooperation. At one side of the spectrum, longstanding economic powers are grappling with high unemployment, tight budgets, and a profound sense of economic fragility. At another side, emerging economies that teetered on the brink of ruin barely a decade ago are now the apples of investors’ eyes globally. Meanwhile prices for the world’s most fundamental commodity — food — are breaching all time records, starkly highlighting the persistent challenges entailed in meeting basic human needs. High food prices prompt alarm for the huge numbers with scarce resources to buy it, alongside quiet pride among the farmers and investors fortunate enough to benefit from selling it. Far away from the conference centers, the pace of technological innovation continues unabated. Hundreds of millions more people are getting access to mobile phones and the Internet every year, and social networking entrepreneurs are finding new and exciting ways every day for all of those people to connect at personal, professional, and humanitarian levels. The unprecedented ability of geographically diffuse communities to link and act around common interests marks one of the great transformations of our time. But the inevitable focus on navigating new global sources of influence and power cannot be left to overshadow the persistent challenges faced by the world’s poorest and least influential people — the ones whom the world has spent 10 years promising to help achieve the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) to cut extreme poverty in its many forms by half by 2015. With roughly one fifth of humanity still living on less than $1/day, the global community must take advantage of the latest tools available to fulfill its commitments. To that end, a year ago more than 60 members of the World Economic Forum’s community of Young Global Leaders made public pledges at the Forum’s Annual Meeting Davos, committing their own private individual and organizational efforts to time-bound, quantified and practical initiatives that can help achieve the MDGs. This week, at the 2011 annual meeting, the MDG Pledges initiative is launching its first major progress report, which is also posted on www.mdgpledges.org . Over the past year, many MDG pledges have made exciting progress. For example, Veronica Colondam and the YCAB Foundation have helped to educate more than 2,700 school drop outs in Indonesia. Leading economists Esther Duflo, Kristin Forbes, Michael Kremer, and Vikram Akula, through Deworm the World, have dewormed more than 3 million children. Zainab Salbi and Women for Women International have supported nearly 43,000 women survivors of war across a range of developing countries. James Kondo and Table for Two have helped to deliver approximately 6 million school meals in Africa. And at a person-to-person scale, Alec Oxenford and the Germinare Foundation have helped two students receive a full scholarship that will enable them to complete both primary and secondary school. These pledges reflect the spirit of the Millennium Developing Goals, one in which everyone must make their best effort to contribute however they can. The pledges are not a supplement for government action. They are an invitation to other individuals and organizations to make their own pledges for the goals, and to register them publicly on www.mdgpledges.org . More than anything, they are indicative of how far and fast an interconnected global community can move forward together, when individuals and organizations decide to collaborate in tackling the world’s most pressing challenges.

Read the full article →

What If Davos Actually Worked?

January 25, 2011

Later this week, the world’s elite will once again gather in Davos, Switzerland at the World Economic Forum’s annual meeting. For those of us not attending, you can think of the Davos conference as a kind of Olympic Village for the powerful. In any given year, there will likely be no greater concentration of influence, sheer talent and wealth than at Davos. Which makes it all the more disappointing that, by many accounts, little is actually accomplished there. World-class networking opportunities aside, there’s considerable gloom surrounding this year’s events, even from the normally supportive media. “Who needs a World Economic Forum?” the BBC asked, while the U.K.’s Telegraph grimly wondered , “Does all the talking make a difference?” Even the WEF’s founder, Klaus Schwab, alluded to the weariness of the tone at Davos this year by warning that the economic recovery may be hindered by “global burnout syndrome.” “We have in the world a situation where the political system and the institutions are just overwhelmed by the complexity which they have to face,” Schwab told Reuters last week. This may explain why, sprinkled amid jargon like “Global Risk Response Mechanism” and “Inclusive Growth,” the WEF’s theme this year is the dreary “Shared Norms For A New Reality.” But what if Davos actually worked? Below, we’ve suggested — okay, not entirely seriously — a few ways the world could benefit if the Davos attendees dropped the rhetoric and got down to business: Russian President Dmitry Medvedev, slated to be the conference’s opening speaker, would realize that his country can’t use Davos to solicit private investment shortly after imprisoning a billionaire in a trial widely viewed as a sham . Many Davos attendees would be dumbstruck upon their first introduction to the concept of “hypocrisy.” The conference’s title would change to “How We Can Help.” Chastened by the 2010 words of Greek prime minister George Papandreou, who told a Davos crowd “We need no bilateral loans ” — just a few months before his country received a massive bilateral loan — the world’s elite would collectively agree on the meaning of “no.” With two “strategic partner” tickets to Davos costing somewhere near $301,000 , per Andrew Ross Sorkin’s estimates, the nonprofit WEF would prominently display a statement of the total revenue pulled in each year, as well as the cost to put on the soiree. Conference attendees would then be able to property assess the value of their Davos swag. Despite Medvedev’s fielding questions via social media , the Davos crowd would realize that just because you’re on Twitter doesn’t mean you’re transparent. Or support human rights . The Davos organizers, recalling their “inclusive growth” theme, would stop prevaricating about a shortage of qualified female attendees and realize they can’t become an “unrivaled platform to shape the global agenda” without full representation from the group that makes up roughly half the world’s population. World leaders would agree that though there are ” dumb regulations ” and bad taxes, there are just as many dumb, if profitable, business ideas and bad CEOs. In a burst of inspiration, the Davos crowd would agree to ditch the Manichean framing of taxes and economic growth. For a lesson, the attendees would consider the entrepreneurial haven of Norway . Instead of waiting until 2019, the bankers in attendance would agree to adopt all of the Basel III requirements , including rules increasing the amount of capital banks must hold against losses. The move would set off a global race to become the healthiest bank in the world. On the news, stock prices would magically rise somehow. Climate change, on the heels of the U.N.’s recent meeting in Cancun , would be recognized as a environmental, social and political threat — and, crucially, a threat to ski conditions at future Davos conferences. Journalists would recognize the terms “pro-business ” and ” pro-growth ” for what they are: euphemisms for a specific set of interests shared by large and powerful corporations. Still, conference attendees would unanimously agree that a “pro-business” global agenda is necessary. Bankers like Barclays chief Bob Diamond would realize that blaming the banking industry for what the IMF has estimated is a $2.28-trillion loss in global wealth is both necessary and deserved — even if he skipped a bonus or two. After widespread worries about his emotional well being, conference founder Klaus Schwab would stop warning of “global burnout syndrome” and begin cautioning about an excess of “reasoned optimism.” Even if the world is heading into, as one top analyst put it, a”super cycle” of economic growth , the Davos-scenti would realize that the bust from our last period of hyper-growth exacted enormous social costs on much of the world. Including, but not limited to

Read the full article →

World Elites Gather For Davos Conference

January 23, 2011

Amid high unemployment and concerns over a mounting sovereign debt crisis, some of the world’s top leaders, thinkers and business titans are gathering once again in Davos, Switzerland for the World Economic Forum’s annual meeting. We’ll be compiling the latest updates from the Davos meetings here, including the best tweets, video, news from the conference and blog posts. Check back here regularly for updates from the event which runs from Jan. 26 – 30.

Read the full article →

Video: El-Erian Says Opportunities Still Exist in Bond Market

January 21, 2011

Jan. 21 (Bloomberg) — Mohamed El-Erian, chief executive officer at Pacific Investment Management Co., talks about investment opportunities in the bond market. El-Erian, speaking with Tom Keene on Bloomberg Radio’s “Surveillance,” also discusses the outlook for the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, next week. (This is an excerpt of the full interview. Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

‘Global Burnout Syndrome’ May Hurt Recovery, Official Warns

January 20, 2011

GENEVA (By Jonathan Lynn) – The world is suffering from “global burnout syndrome” and is too weak to tackle the web of interrelated threats facing businesses and governments, the head of the World Economic Forum said on Wednesday. Klaus Schwab, who chairs the WEF that organizes the annual meeting of executives and politicians at Davos, said the world had not yet fully digested the crisis that emerged from the financial crunch, and was not yet in post-crisis phase. “We have to be careful that this crisis does not become a social crisis — which it has in some countries,” the German business studies professor told a media conference on the gathering at the Swiss resort from January 26 to January 30. “We have in the world a situation where the political system and the institutions are just overwhelmed by the complexity which they have to face,” he said. The Davos meeting, protected by beefed-up Swiss security which includes the closing of local airspace, is the world’s top networking event, allowing bankers and CEOs to rub shoulders with presidents and prime ministers, and to cut deals. But the uneven economic recovery makes it a particularly challenging time to be meeting, with emerging economies rebounding but rich countries still struggling. In the rich world social tension is rising as governments bring in austerity measures to pay off debt or postpone hard decisions on borrowing, while companies return to profitability and banks resume controversial bonus payments. Global forecasting and analysis group IHS says a restructuring of eurozone sovereign debt is inevitable and while it is unlikely that fringe countries will drop out of the euro, financial markets could force the next phase of crisis management as early as this year. “This will very likely include a debt restructuring plan, with ‘haircuts’ for investors and further aid for the European banks holding much of this debt,” IHS Chief Economist Nariman Behravesh said in a briefing for the Davos forum. COMBINATION OF RISK, FAILURE OF GOVERNANCE In a report last week, the WEF identified three interrelated nexuses of risks — economic, such as fiscal, trade and currency problems; raw materials, particularly the impact of rising energy costs and dwindling water supplies on food prices; and illegal trade, corruption and failed states. “It’s not just risks in isolation, it’s the combination of risks that can be so dangerous,” said WEF Chief Business Officer Robert Greenhill. Rising economic disparity and social tension nationally and the increasing inability of the global community to tackle problems proactively exacerbates these threats. “It’s that failure of global governance… which is perhaps the greatest risk of all,” Greenhill said. Glitz and hype surround the meeting in Davos, an upmarket ski resort made famous by German novelist Thomas Mann in his novel “The Magic Mountain” written at a time when it was better known for its sanitoriums for wealthy tuberculosis sufferers. But the organizers do not claim it can actually solve the problems it discusses — although anti-capitalist campaigners denounce it as a plutocratic cabal plotting global domination. “The World Economic Forum is not a decision-making body. It fosters dialogue, it fosters understanding,” Schwab said. But Greenhill said it will try to help with the complex of threats by launching a “global risk response network” bringing together company risk officers and government policy-makers. As usual the WEF will wheel out several global leaders among its 2,500 participants. The chair of the G20, French President Nicolas Sarkozy, addresses the forum on Thursday, January 27. Among 25 government heads expected are German Chancellor Angela Merkel and Russian President Dmitry Medvedev, who opens the forum on Wednesday, January 26. Medvedev, a keen user of the micro-blogging site Twitter, will take questions from the public via “crowdsourcing” on www.wef.ch/askdmitrimedvedev. The cast list also features eight central bankers, including European Central Bank President Jean-Claude Trichet, who will also take part in an open session accessible to the public, and 14 labor leaders and more than 1,400 CEOs and other business chiefs — 400 of whom will be using Twitter as “CEO reporters.” Davos’s reputation in the past was made by several high-profile diplomatic meetings on the sidelines. This year, seven key trade ministers hosted by the European Union will meet on Friday, January 28, as part of renewed efforts to conclude the nine-year-old Doha round to free up world trade — itself one of the biggest failures of global governance. For full coverage, blogs and TV from Davos go to www.reuters.com/davos (Editing by Louise Ireland) Copyright 2010 Thomson Reuters. Click for Restrictions .

Read the full article →

Video: Shankar Says Emerging Markets May Draw `Rush of Money’

October 27, 2010

Oct. 27 (Bloomberg) — V. Shankar, Standard Chartered Plc chief executive officer for Europe, the Middle East and Africa, talks about the outlook for emerging markets. He speaks with Francine Lacqua on Bloomberg Television’s “Countdown” at the World Economic Forum in Marrakech, Morocco.

Read the full article →

Video: Al-Maraj Says Bahrain’s Interest Rate `Suitable’ at 0.5%

October 27, 2010

Oct. 27 (Bloomberg) — Bahrain’s Central Bank governor Rasheed al-Maraj talks with Bloomberg’s Francine Lacqua about the outlook for the kingdom’s economy and monetary policy. They spoke yesterday on the sidelines of the World Economic Forrum in Marrakesh, Morroco.

Read the full article →

Video: Gopalakrishnan Says Infosys Doesn’t Have `Pricing Power’: Video

September 14, 2010

Sept. 15 (Bloomberg) — S. Gopalakrishnan, chief executive officer of Infosys Technologies Ltd., India’s second-largest software exporter, talks about the company’s business strategy. Gopalakrishnan says Infosys has little ability to increase prices at the moment as customers globally seek short-term contracts on concerns about the strength of a global recovery. Gopalakrishnan also discusses Infosys’s business in China. He talked with Bloomberg’s Stephen Engle at the World Economic Forum’s “Summer Davos” meetings in Tianjin, China. (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Video: Grimsson Says Iceland Seeks Solution in Depositor Spat: Video

September 14, 2010

Sept. 15 (Bloomberg) — Iceland’s President Olafur R. Grimsson talked about the nation’s two-year-old dispute with the U.K. and Netherlands over repayment of $5.1 billion in depositor claims and its implications for the island’s negotiations to join the European Union. The European Parliament in July called on Iceland to settle its foreign depositor claims, which stem from the collapse of Landsbanki Islands hf in October 2008. Grimsson talked yesterday with Bloomberg’s Stephen Engle at the World Economic Forum’s “Summer Davos” in Tianjin, China. (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Video: Sorrell Sees `Better Than Anticipated Rise in Ad Demand: Video

September 14, 2010

Sept. 14 (Bloomberg) — Martin Sorrell, chief executive officer of WPP Plc, talks about the outlook for the advertising market. WPP is the world’s largest advertising company. Sorrell, speaking from the World Economic Forum in Tianjin, China, talks with Erik Schatzker on Bloomberg Television’s “InsideTrack.” (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Video: PwC’s Lyn Sees China Listing More State-Owned Companies: Video

September 13, 2010

Sept. 14 (Bloomberg) — Frank Lyn, China markets leader at PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, talks about China’s economic policy and financial market regulation. China’s Premier Wen Jiabao said the world’s fastest growing economy is in “good shape,” a sign of his confidence that the nation will avoid a sharp slowdown. Lyn speaks with Bloomberg’s Stephen Engle at the World Economic Forum’s “Summer Davos” in Tianjin, China. (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

US Drops To Fourth In Global Competitiveness

September 10, 2010

The US has slipped to fourth on a ranking of global competitiveness from the World Economic Forum as the financial crisis recession and reforms weigh on private institutions according to The Wall Street Journal

Read the full article →

World Economic Forum’s Technology Pioneers Of 2011: See The 31 Most Innovative Start-Ups

September 2, 2010

Much has been made of the Vanity Fair 100 , a list of “the 100 most influential people of the Information Age.” But this list looks backward, highlighting well-known names like Zuckerberg, Jobs, Page, and Brin. Another just-released ranking is all about the future–and the new innovators who will define it. The World Economic Forum has chosen 31 innovative start-ups to honor as the Technology Pioneers of 2011. Selected from over 330 nominations from more than a dozen countries, the World Economic Forum’s Technology Pioneers “represent the cutting edge in innovation and are poised to have a critical impact on the future of business, industry and society.” Kevin Comolli, Managing General Partner at Accel Partners, called this year’s selection process “one of the most difficult to date.” See the 31 innovative and visionary Technology Pioneers in the slideshow below. You can learn more about the selection process and companies from the World Economic Forum .

Read the full article →

Video: Bosworth Doubts Global Growth Will Reach IMF Forecast: Video

July 8, 2010

July 8 (Bloomberg) — Barry Bosworth, senior fellow at the Brookings Institution, talks with Bloomberg’s Julie Hyman about the International Monetary Fund’s increase in its forecast for global growth this year. The world economy will expand 4.6 percent in 2010, the biggest gain since 2007, compared with an April projection of 4.2 percent, the Washington-based fund said in revisions yesterday to its World Economic Outlook. (Source: Bloomberg)

Read the full article →

Olivier Blanchard: Global Economy: Continuing Recovery But Clouds on the Horizon

July 8, 2010

The macroeconomic forecasts in the IMF’s latest World Economic Outlook update reflect two opposing forces. Looking back, say over the first half of the year, numbers about economic activity have come in strong, indeed somewhat stronger than we had forecast. These would give reasons to be more optimistic than we were earlier. Looking forward, however, strong clouds have appeared on the horizon. They present real dangers and serious policy challenges, and give reasons to be less optimistic than we were earlier. Assessing the balance of these two forces is a difficult exercise. Our forecast for world growth in 2010 is about 4½ %, a bit higher than our April forecast of around 4¼ %. This revision largely reflects the stronger activity during the first half of the year. Our forecast for 2011 is broadly unchanged, at about 4¼ %. As always, these world growth rates hide a large difference between and within advanced and emerging and developing economies. Our growth forecast for advanced countries is 2.6% for 2010 and 2.4% for 2011. These low growth rates imply that high unemployment will remain a central issue for some time to come. Our growth forecast for emerging and developing economies is much higher, 6.8% in 2010 and 6.4% in 2011, an upward revision of 0.5% for 2010 and a small downward revision of 0.1% for 2011. Let me develop these two themes, a continuing recovery, but clouds on the horizon. The world economy expanded at an annualized rate of over 5 % in the first quarter of 2010. Growth was stronger than expected in most countries, including the United States, Europe, Japan, Brazil, and India. And, in most cases, it has reflected stronger private demand, which is a good sign for the future. The most recent indicators suggest some slowdown of demand, but it is too early to assess how significant this slowdown may be. The clouds started building over Greece , but quickly extended to Europe, and threaten to cover the entire global economy. Worries about fiscal solvency in Greece turned into worries about fiscal solvency elsewhere. Worries about fiscal solvency have triggered worries about the solvency of banks. These in turn have led to financial turbulence, disruptions in market financing and a freeze in the interbank market in Europe. Our baseline forecasts are constructed under the assumption that policy responses will be adequate, and will limit the effects on the real economy. Even in this case ,however, they are likely to have four main macroeconomic implications. The first, which we have already observed, is a depreciation of the Euro . The second is a tightening of bank lending , especially, but perhaps not only in Europe. The third is the need for fiscal consolidation , which, even if well executed, is likely to affect demand and growth adversely in the short run. The fourth is a near-term reallocation of capital flows . For the rest of these remarks, let me focus on the last two implications, fiscal consolidation, and capital flows. The current policy focus in advanced countries is to put in place fiscal consolidation plans. While fiscal stimulus was necessary to stem a potentially catastrophic collapse of output in 2008 and 2009, countries must return to a sustainable fiscal path. The question is when, and at what speed. We believe that the key here is to put in place a credible roadmap”to stabilize the ratio of debt to GDP over the medium term, with the goal of decreasing it substantially over the longer term. In fact, at the recent G-20 Summit in Toronto, advanced economies committed to fiscal plans that will stabilize or reduce government debt to GDP ratios by 2016, which is in line with our recommendations. We believe that credibility can be achieved in two ways: First by passing reforms which improve the medium and long term outlook, such as increases in the retirement age in line with higher life expectancy. Second, by putting in place fiscal rules, such as limits on the growth of spending over time. The adjustment should start soon, but too much front-loading, too sharp a cut in deficits this year or next year, would be counterproductive. The recovery in advanced economies is still fragile, and monetary policy (already very accommodative) cannot yet be used to significantly offset the adverse short run effects of fiscal consolidation. Current plans for 2011, which imply an average decrease in the cyclically adjusted deficit in advanced G-20 countries, of about 1.25% strike us as roughly appropriate. However, what is still missing in many countries are ambitious reform to entitlement systems and, in many cases, better fiscal rules. Let me finally turn to capital flows. Before problems in Europe came to the fore, capital flows to emerging market countries were steadily increasing. Events in Europe have led to a partial reversal. While fiscal worries in advanced countries have made emerging market countries relatively more appealing, higher risk aversion on the part of investors has led them to repatriate funds, leading to a decrease in capital flows to emerging markets. We expect this reversal to be temporary, and we see the trend as one of continuing strong capital flows to emerging market countries. These inflows present emerging market countries with a difficult challenge, namely how to best deal with them. Two considerations are important here. The first is that these flows are largely driven by good fundamentals, and likely to be long lasting: limiting their overall size through controls, or fighting their effect on the exchange rate through reserve accumulation, may prove difficult and eventually self defeating. The second is that many emerging market countries would benefit from a shift from external to internal demand. This would allow them to maintain growth in the face of lower exports to advanced countries, and to better satisfy domestic needs. To achieve this requires both structural reforms and exchange rate appreciations. In this respect, the decisions by China to boost internal demand and allow for more flexibility of the yuan are welcome. To summarize, while we remain cautiously optimistic about the pace of recovery, there are clear dangers and policy challenges ahead. How Europe deals with fiscal and financial problems, how advanced countries proceed with fiscal consolidation, and how emerging countries rebalance their economies, will determine the outcome. From iMFdirect blog

Read the full article →

Stephan B. Tanda: Health Is the Achilles Heel of Corporate America

May 19, 2010

The two biggest domestic political issues that dominated our national discourse over 2009 and 2010 were healthcare reform and the economic crisis. However, these two issues were rarely discussed in conjunction, especially in many of the boardrooms of major US corporations. This is a common mistake as there is a strong link between the health and wellness of employees and company profit and performance. A report by the World Economic Forum on corporate health and wellness estimates that the global loss in productivity due to chronic illness hovers around the $2 trillion mark. The United States alone rakes up half of this shortfall, estimated at $1 trillion. To put this number is perspective, the entire US bank bailout in 2009 was $700 billion, or $300 billion less than the economic loss from health related lower productivity. Added to this, corporations in the US are also faced with soaring healthcare costs for its employees as nearly all major corporations offer health insurance as an employment benefit. In contrast, companies that have adopted proactive, corporate wellness programs have experienced an average savings of $700 per employee per year and have seen a return on investment upwards of 755% in reduced healthcare costs and higher productivity levels. While corporate health and wellness programs are not mainstream, these programs are far from a new concept. Companies across the globe, both in white collar and blue collar industries, have created successful programs that have delivered impressive and often inspiring results. Blue Cross/Blue Shield of Indiana and Coors Brewing Company, for example, both introduced a corporate fitness program, which reaped a ROI of 151% and 515% respectively. In many cases, especially for labor intensive industries, the failure to adopt a wellness program can be very costly. Cainbro, one of the largest civil and heavy industrial construction companies in the US, was experiencing an average increase in healthcare costs of 21%. The company decided to introduce a wellness and safety program in an attempt to reduce their healthcare expenditures. After the first year, the company experienced a savings over their projected healthcare expenditures of over $1.2 million. By year four, their saving grew to almost $5 million. Corporate health and wellness programs are also strong morale boosters and a powerful talent retention and recruitment tool. Organizations that have and actively promote such programs are seen to be top performers in their sector and they are 4 times less likely to lose talent within the next year. Research by the World Economic Forum has shown that 64% of employees that have a favorable view of their company’s health and wellness program plan to stay with the company for at least five years. Given the enormous cost savings benefits, increases in productivity and competitive advantage, especially in a globalized economy, there is a strong business rationale for companies to invest in developing robust and comprehensive health and wellness programs. However, in order to achieve this, companies need to adopt sophisticated and strategic programs that have deep corporate engagement and that holistically address health. In other words, it should not be seen as simply a Human Resources project or a one-off event but rather a strategic board level decision aimed at making the company perform better and be more attractive for its current and prospective employees. As a board member, I have a responsibility to look after the bottom line and to make decisions that will improve the financial position of the company. From our experience, I can honestly say that it has begun to make a difference. Having a long established expertise in nutrition, we can draw on our knowledge to invest in our human resources. Consequently, we are building a robust health and wellness program across our global operations and developing it into a service offering we are taking to the marketplace. While the business benefits are clear, on a personal level, what has been even more gratifying for me is to hear personal stories of employees that have lost weight, lowered their cholesterol and blood pressure levels and in general are happier at work. As we spend more and more of our time at work, I believe that we, as business leaders, need to make the work environment as rewarding as possible. I am glad that we have found a way to not only achieve this goal but to improve the performance of the company at the same time. Therefore, I would urge my fellow business leaders to seriously consider introducing health and wellness programs as a key performance driver. Furthermore, industry associations also have a role to play. For example, the Grocery Manufacturers Association’s Health Weight Commitment program was developed to reduce obesity through school and workplace initiatives and more informative packaging. Such actions are highly commendable as they contribute to the promotion of healthy lifestyles for all members of the family. It is also important for government to actively promote the uptake of these programs from small businesses to major corporations. This can range from providing incentives to companies that initiate such programs within their organizations to an aggressive communication campaign, similar to Michelle Obama’s Childhood Obesity Initiative, which is a multi-agency, multi-stakeholder plan to holistically address childhood wellness. Finally employees must show their interest, desire and commitment to partake in these programs to ensure that they are successful for the benefit of themselves, their families and their organizations. Thus, we all have a responsibility in our professional and personal capacities to make these programs work, which requires sincere and genuine dedication. By proactively addressing health and wellness in the work place, combined with such efforts as the First Lady’s childhood obesity initiative, and incorporating healthy habits into our homes, we can begin to create a new health paradigm that will ultimately make us more successful as individuals and as a society.

Read the full article →

India Unveils $11 Billion Fund for Roads, Ports to Narrow Gap With China

May 13, 2010

By Unni Krishnan and Santosh Kumar May 14 (Bloomberg) — India is planning to set up a 500 billion rupee ($11 billion) infrastructure debt fund as it seeks to address a power shortage and upgrade its roads and ports, Montek Singh Ahluwalia , a top government adviser said. “The modalities are being worked out,” he said in a telephone interview from New Delhi. “The idea is to refinance lending institutions. We are talking to the World Bank and other multilateral agencies.” India, ranked below war-ravaged Ivory Coast and Sri Lanka for the quality of its infrastructure, spent 6.5 percent of its gross domestic product in 2009 on infrastructure, compared with about 11 percent by China, according to an Ernst & Young India report. Failure to lift investment may imperil Prime Minister Manmohan Singh ’s target of boosting economic growth to 10 percent needed to pull 828 million people living on less than $2 out of poverty. The fund is a “good start but it won’t be enough,” said Prasanna Ananthasubramaniam , chief economist at ICICI Securities Primary Dealership Ltd. in Mumbai. “One fund cannot take all the risks of infrastructure projects.” Ahluwalia, deputy chairman of the nation’s Planning Commission, said in a report in March that India may need as much as $1 trillion in investment between 2012 and 2017. The proposed fund will sell bonds and lend to projects, he said yesterday. India is ranked 89 out of 133 nations for its infrastructure, according to the World Economic Forum’s Global Competitiveness Index . Largest Cities India’s per capita spending on city development is $17 each year, just 15 percent of what China spends, according to a report released by McKinsey & Co. last month. India will have 68 cities with a population of more than one million people, 13 cities with more than four million people and 6 mega cities with populations of 10 million or more, at least two of which will be among the five largest cities in the world by 2030. India produces about 10 percent less electricity than it needs. The roads, which account for 65 percent of India’s cargo, are plagued by single lanes and irregular surfaces, slowing trucks to an average speed of about 20 kilometers per hour, said a 2009 study by Transport Corp. of India and the Indian Institute of Management, Calcutta. The average time taken by ships to unload and load at Indian ports is almost 96 hours, about 10 times longer than in Hong Kong, the government said in its latest annual economic survey. To contact the reporters on this story: Unni Krishnan in New Delhi at ukrishnan2@bloomberg.net ; Santosh Kumar in New Delhi at sthakur10@bloomberg.net

Read the full article →

John Hope Bryant: Financial Literacy as the New Civil Right: Why It Matters to Business in America

April 18, 2010

Introducing the Gallup-Operation HOPE Financial Literacy Index In 1960, the issue here and around the world was the emergence of democracy, and making it real to you and me. Well, let’s say the minority and the poor you and me. The way we commodified democracy and “made it relevant,” was the right to vote, equal access and equal rights. But today, in the backdrop of a global economic crisis, there are more people in America with no bank account than didn’t have the right to vote in 1960, or 40 million (unbanked and under-banked). Today everyone — be you white, black, red, brown or yellow — wants some more green. Today, 70% of Americans were living from paycheck to paycheck, and that was before the economic crisis. Today, everyone needs to be bi-lingual. You need to understand English and the language of money, or financial literacy. Today, if you don’t understand the language of money, and you don’t have a bank account, you are an economic slave. But this movement may prove much more difficult than the last, as money is emotional and elusive. Understanding the language of money and financial literacy is often buried in the shadows of an odd, colorless shame. 50% of those in foreclosure never pick up the phone and call their lender. The number #1 reason for divorce in America is money. The #1 reason why kids drop out of college, and particularly, black and brown kids, is not academic success but money. This year alone, 350 young ladies, who had stellar academic records, initially could not return to Spelman College simply because they could not afford tuition. Thanks to some private Spelman donors, this stark reality was reversed for all but a few of these young women on a mission to improve themselves. The “gap” here was not ambition or work ethic, but money. How we fight this war on financial literacy will not be in the streets, but in the suites. It will feature amongst other things, a five-part strategy including: 1. Mandatory financial literacy for every youth 4th through 12th grade; 2. A domestic Peace Corps of relevant role models which connects education to real success or failure in life; 3. An electronic debit card accessed FDIC or NCUA insured bank or credit union account secured at birth, no different than your Social Security number. This would also help to push financial predators, such as payday lenders and check cashers, out of business; 4. The mother of all national financial literacy assessment — the Gallup-HOPE Financial Literacy Index. 5. Private sector adoption of financial literacy in financial products and services, as well as Human Resources department, such as the 5-year HOPE agreement has entered into with the Financial Services Roundtable. The magic behind the Gallup-HOPE Financial Literacy Index In 2009, Gallup teamed up with America’s Promise Alliance to produce The Gallup Student Poll and surveyed 70,078 students in grades 5 through 12, from 335 schools and 59 districts located in 18 states and the District of Columbia. Based on the Gallup Student Poll, half of American students are hopeful; these students possess numerous ideas and abundant energy for the future. The other half of students are stuck (33%) or discouraged (17%), lacking the ideas and energy they need to navigate problems and reach goals. Hope varies little across grade levels. Across participating schools, class size was negatively associated with hope (larger the class, lower the hope) and the percentage of students on free and reduced lunch was not associated with hope. Furthermore, Gallup has already proven that hope is a more powerful indicator of academic success and graduation rates than GPA or ACT scores. I cannot help but focus on this 50% hopeful number, as approximately 40-50% of urban youth in America are dropping out of high school, and it seems are not very hopeful at all. Doubling Hope Hope is malleable (Gallup, 2009c; Lopez, Rose, Robinson, Marques, & Pais Reibero, 2009) and 50% of American students need support from parents, school, business and the community to build their energy and ideas for the future. Financial literacy is one of the incredibly under-utilized tools that can be used to energize our youth and build their ideas in their own future. Want to keep a kid in school? Show them how to succeed, prosper, do well, even how to get rich (legally) if they want to. That’s financial literacy, free enterprise and capitalism, ownership, opportunity and entrepreneurship. In short, we need to reconnect education with the relevancy of “doing well.” Financial literacy is the next civil right and the first global silver rights empowerment tool. Without a big burst in national 4th-12th grade financial literacy, America will not be globally competitive. The problem can’t be fixed “nationally,” it has to be fixed locally — one city, one school and one student at a time, and most importantly, local leaders can’t manage this phenomenon unless they can measure it. Enter the Gallup-HOPE Financial Literacy Index, 2010 . We intend to include “all” students between 5th-12th grades, so we will be gathering a census, not a sample. We want to measure how many have a general understanding of running a business, whether they ever have held a job and been paid, do they have a savings account, do they have a positive image of free enterprise and its role in American society, and do they see themselves playing a role in it. We are building a leadership tool with the Gallup-HOPE Index that will tell local city leaders if they are raising the next generation of local small, medium and large businesses — businesses and jobs that will be needed to create the necessary tax base to sustain that city. This is why financial literacy is not only the next civil right, but critically important to American competitiveness, and business too. John Hope Bryant is the founder, chairman and CEO of Operation HOPE, financial literacy advisor to the World Economic Forum Global Agenda Council, a Young Global Leaders for the World Economic Forum, and author of LOVE LEADERSHIP; A New Way to Lead in a Fear-Based World (Jossey-Bass) , which debuted in August, 2009, as the Amazon.com #1 Hottest New Book (for Leadership), on the CEO Reads Top 10 Business Best Seller List, and was published in November, 2009 in digital audio book format on Audible.com, iTunes and other audio book retailers . Love Leadership continued to be listed amongst the Top 25 Business Books for CEO READS for the 7 month period after release.

Read the full article →

Swiss Re Says Brazil Spending for World Cup, Olympics Means More Revenue

April 8, 2010

By Alexander Cuadros April 8 (Bloomberg) — Swiss Reinsurance Co. , the world’s second-biggest reinsurer, said Brazil’s infrastructure spending as it prepares for the 2014 World Cup soccer tournament and the 2016 Olympics means the country will be a “high-growth market” for the company. Most revenue gains for the Zurich-based company will be in emerging markets such as Latin America, while those in U.S. and other developed countries remain “flat to low,” said Walter Bell , chairman of the Swiss Re unit for U.S., Canada and Brazil. “Our commitment to the region is long term,” Bell said in an interview at the World Economic Forum on Latin America in Cartagena, Colombia. “Brazil is at the top of the list. Mexico — we’re very bullish on Mexico.” Brazil said in January it plans to spend 19.5 billion reais ($11 billion) to improve infrastructure and prepare for the World Cup in two years. Rio de Janeiro state, whose capital will host the Olympics, expects as much as $90 billion in investments in the next three years, primarily in shipbuilding, iron and steel manufacturing and nuclear power, Governor Sergio Cabral said last week. Brazil’s planned infrastructure investments mean it “will be a high-growth market for some time to come,” Bell said. He declined to say how much he expected revenues in the region to increase. Reinsurance rates may react to this year’s “excessive” catastrophes such as the February earthquake in Chile and the Xynthia windstorm that crossed Spain and France, Bell said. “The market has been predicting rates would rise,” he said. “With that kind of severity and frequency of risk, pricing will probably have to be more reflective of what the risk reinsurers and insurers are taking on these days. There’s some elasticity in the rates.” Quake, Windstorm Swiss Re said last month it expects about $500 million in claims from the Chile quake and about 100 million Swiss francs ($93 million) in losses from Xynthia. Global reinsurance prices dropped 6 percent for policies renewed Jan. 1 after catastrophe damage fell and capital markets improved, according to Marsh & McLennan Cos. Only two tropical storms struck the U.S. in 2009, compared with 2008 when Hurricanes Ike and Gustav contributed to $27 billion in costs to insurers, according to the Insurance Information Institute. Swiss Re increased its dividend in February and reported a 2009 profit gain, recovering from the previous year when the reinsurer reported a loss of about 1 billion francs tied to securities such as credit default swaps. To contact the reporter on this story: Alexander Cuadros in Cartagena at acuadros@bloomberg.net .

Read the full article →

Richard Attias: Y2K Plus 10: Time to Reassess and Revitalize Business in a Damaged World Economy

March 22, 2010

Maybe it’s because we made such a big deal of Y2K ten years ago that the advent of the second decade of the 21st century hasn’t gotten as much discussion. As the OO’s left us, the near collapse of the global financial system shook the world economy to its core. With those events as its bookends, the decade just past was a pretty rough start. So as the “tweener” years begin, might it be time for world leaders – construed broadly — to take stock, arrive at some consensus about the future, set some priorities and take steps to spark revitalization and renewal? The current economic downturn has destroyed enormous amounts of capital and wealth, idled millions or workers, created a crisis of confidence in our financial markets and institutions and literally put entire nations on the brink of bankruptcy. As we begin the second decade of the 21st century, global business will never be the same. What I’m proposing and organizing in the wake of the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression is an attempt to jump-start a new paradigm for growth and progress around the globe. This new event — the New York Forum will bring together 500 business leaders, entrepreneurs, sovereign investment managers, regulatory officials and academics. Their mission? To discuss, dialogue and debate the direction that business ought to take at Y2K Plus 10. Could such a meeting really work? In my experience, yes (by way of disclosure I have produced the World Economic Forum for the last 13 years and launched the Clinton Global Initiative in 2005). Those recent efforts – and others like the work of the Gates Foundation – underscore the power that convocations and commitment by world leaders can have. Global agendas can be established, universally accepted approaches can be adopted and huge problems can be eradicated. The New York Forum would amplify the power of the concept in three ways: Focus — The New York Forum would seek to emulate the methodology of other successful initiatives while focusing its power on a single area of activity – business. Interactivity – The Forum would set new standards of participation, with the relatively small group of attendees able to take part in every session, offering their perspective and influencing the collective understanding and opinion. The format will facilitate and require dialog, insuring interaction and contribution, not just passive listening. Location – New York represents both the past and future of global business. Contained in its DNA is the creativity, innovation, cultural diversity, freedom and heritage of opportunity and achievement. More than any other, it is the city where anything is possible and comebacks follow setbacks. The good news is that out of the current crisis, opportunity will inevitably emerge. Every sphere of the global economy — manufacturing, energy, financial services, health care, media , technology, retail , real estate, travel and tourism — needs to be reinvented for the young century. The pace of change in the 2000s will be exponentially more rapid than last century. Now, at what may be the nadir for the next 30 years, is the moment to gather the right players and determine how to revive the global economy, create new jobs, attack the scourge of unemployment and gain access to the necessary financing. I am committed to mounting the New York Forum June 22-24, three-and-a-half months from now. There is no time to waste. All the relevant stakeholders face the same challenges, yearn to grow and prosper and prime the engine of commerce to improve people’s lives. Ten years in to the new century, we know business will never be the same; if we act now we will have a good chance, at the end of this decade, to say business is not only different than it was but also better.

Read the full article →

Jarislowsky `Convinced’ There’s a Bubble in Booming Canada Housing Market

February 12, 2010

By Greg Quinn Feb. 12 (Bloomberg) — Stephen Jarislowsky , chairman of Montreal-based investment adviser Jarislowsky Fraser Ltd., said he is “convinced” there’s a bubble in Canada’s housing market, fueled by government measures that encouraged consumers to take on debt . “They have basically encouraged people to buy houses based on cheap mortgages,” Jarislowsky, 84, said in a telephone interview from Montreal. “That has created the opposite effect of what was desirable.” Canadian home prices and resales will grow to records this year, boosted by low interest rates , the Canadian Real Estate Association said in a report this week. Canadian new-home prices rose 0.4 percent in December from the previous month, the sixth straight gain, government figures showed yesterday. “I am convinced there is a housing bubble in Canada,” said Jarislowsky, whose investment fund owns shares in Canada’s four biggest banks, including Toronto-based Royal Bank of Canada . The comments by Jarislowsky, who is one of Canada’s wealthiest investors with a fortune worth C$1.85 billion ($952 million) according to Canadian Business magazine, contrast with the view held by Finance Minister Jim Flaherty , who sees “no clear evidence” of a housing bubble, his spokesman, Chisholm Pothier , said this week. Tax Credits Existing home sales will increase 13 percent and the average price will gain 5.4 percent to C$337,500, according to the real estate group, which is known as CREA. Jarislowsky said the government should have put more stimulus money into boosting infrastructure, not household spending. Canada’s government, led by Prime Minister Stephen Harper , has brought in a temporary tax credit for home renovations, given a tax break to first-time home buyers and purchased mortgages from banks to encourage new lending. Bank of Canada Governor Mark Carney , meanwhile, has also pledged to keep his main interest rate at a record low 0.25 percent through June unless the inflation outlook shifts. The average five-year mortgage rate was 5.39 percent on Feb. 10. In May it was 5.25 percent, the lowest since 1951 according to Bank of Canada figures . “I conclude that the prices of housing today in the U.S. are cheaper than they should be, and that the prices in Canada are far more expensive than they should be,” Jarislowsky said. Tools to Fight Bank of Canada Adviser David Wolf said in a January speech that it’s “premature” to conclude there’s a bubble in the housing market, and a rate increase to slow it would “be dousing the entire Canadian economy with cold water, just as it emerges from recession.” The Department of Finance in 2008 said Canada Mortgage and Housing Corp. would limit amortizations to 35 years and offer loan insurance on only 95 percent of the loan value. The government’s housing agency had offered mortgage insurance on loans worth as much as 100 percent of the home value and amortization periods of as many as 40 years since 2006. Pothier said this week the government has policy tools available to counter any negative “trends” in the housing market if needed. He didn’t elaborate. The booming housing market partly reflects the strength of Canada’s financial system, which was named the soundest in the world for two consecutive years by the Geneva-based World Economic Forum . To be sure, Jarislowsky said that consumers are stretched with respect to their debt burdens and that the government should seek to bring spending back to a sustainable pace. “Excess spending by the consumer and going further into debt was the worst thing that they could do, and that is what has happened in Canada,” he said. To contact the reporter on this story: Greg Quinn in Ottawa at gquinn1@bloomberg.net .

Read the full article →

Canadian Corporate Bonds Outperform U.S. as Spreads Diverge: Canada Credit

February 11, 2010

By Chris Fournier and Theophilos Argitis Feb. 11 (Bloomberg) — Canada’s corporate bonds are diverging from those in the U.S. as investors bet that the nation’s banks are insulated from worsening government finances that threaten to slow the global economy and create more losses for financial institutions. The extra yield investors demand to buy debt issued by companies in Canada instead of government securities is unchanged this month at 123 basis points, while so-called spreads on U.S. bonds widened 9 basis points to 190 basis points, or 1.9 percentage points, according to Bank of America Merrill Lynch indexes. The difference in spreads reached 67 basis points this week, the most since Dec. 14. Canada’s financial system was named the soundest in the world for two consecutive years by the Geneva-based World Economic Forum. None of the nation’s banks collapsed or sought a bailout during the seizure in credit markets, as the U.S. spent more than $400 billion to support institutions, including American International Group Inc. and Citigroup Inc. “We’re still getting a lot more cash into our market and demand is overwhelming supply,” said Robert Follis , the managing director of corporate bond research in Toronto at Bank of Nova Scotia, Canada’s third-largest lender. “Our exposure to the more volatile financials is lower than in the U.S.” Bank of America Corp. in Charlotte, North Carolina, and New York-based Citigroup had their credit outlooks cut to “negative” from “stable” by Standard & Poor’s on Feb. 9. Bond Returns Canada’s company bonds have returned 2.04 percent this year, including accrued interest, compared with 1.11 percent in the U.S., Merrill Lynch’s indexes show. The average yield is 3.77 percent, below the 4.69 percent in the U.S. Elsewhere in credit markets, Canada sold C$3.2 billion ($3 billion) of three-year bonds yesterday at an average yield of 1.875 percent. Yields on the nation’s short-term debt are higher than those in the U.S. on speculation the Bank of Canada will need to raise interest rates faster than the U.S. Federal Reserve as Canada’s economy rebounds. Canada’s two-year note maturing in 2012 yields 1.35 percent, compared with 0.875 percent for a similar U.S. security. The Bank of Canada left the target overnight interest rate at a record low 0.25 percent in January and reiterated a pledge to hold it there through June, barring a change in the inflation outlook. The rate to exchange, or swap, floating- for fixed-rate payments for five years rose to 2.69 percent yesterday from 1.88 percent a year ago. The rate can be used to gauge expectations for future interest rate movements. Raising Forecasts Economists are raising their growth forecasts for Canada’s economy, as businesses in the U.S. and Canada build up inventories and record low rates fuel demand for homes. Canadian Finance Minister Jim Flaherty on Feb. 2 said the economists he consulted before next month’s budget boosted their growth estimates to 2.6 percent, from 2.3 percent in September. Statistics Canada reported Feb. 5 the country gained almost three times as many jobs as expected in January. Canada’s economy gained 43,000 jobs last month after losing 2,600 positions in December, Statistics Canada said in Ottawa. The median forecast of 22 economists in a Bloomberg News survey was for an increase of 15,000. The unemployment rate dropped to 8.3 percent from 8.5 percent. While U.S. President Barack Obama has proposed a new bank tax and banning banks from owning proprietary trading operations, hedge funds and private-equity funds, Flaherty has rejected imposing similar measures. Corporate borrowing costs globally have been rising amid concern worsening government finances will slow the global economy and make it harder for companies to meet debt payments. Canada, already with the lowest debt levels in the Group of Seven, plans to return to balanced budgets over the “medium term,” Flaherty has said. To contact the reporters on this story: Chris Fournier in Montreal at cfournier3@bloomberg.net ; Theophilos Argitis in Ottawa at targitis@bloomberg.net

Read the full article →

Diane Francis: Eurogate — The New Fannie, Freddie and AIG

February 8, 2010

“This is a statistical recovery and a human recession.” — Larry Summers It was the best one-liner I heard come out of the recent World Economic Forum in Davos. Of course one week later, speculation rife in sessions entitled, “Will there be a double dip?” were overtaken by the Double Dip itself. Markets began roiling after the European Union’s central banker and various leaders admitted that they had not ever undertaken, nor required, independent audits to monitor the financial behavior of the Euro’s 16 user-nations. They took their finance ministers’ words for it. Sounds like the Bush regime which took their Wall Streeters’ words for it. We enter a new currency melee which gives “Beware the Greeks” new meaning. Greece is only the beginning of a new Euro Plague, whose value will be drubbed by a complete failure to supervise members — a governance lapse every bit as reckless as the deregulatory religion that brought down the U.S. and British economies. The Euro’s woes will drives up the bailouts required by Germany and France, the uber-Euro nations, and will lead to more collapses. Enter the “PIGS” — Portugal Italy, Spain as well as Greece — which have been a currency headache to many since 2008. These countries are the Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and AIG of Europe and the loans required to keep them afloat promise to be Europe’s sub-prime equivalents. This is because these basketcase countries are cheaters when it came to the voluntary rules and regulations that were designed to uphold the integrity and value of the Euro. So much for Sarkozy’s Gallic finger-wagging in Davos at the Anglo-Saxon economies and their laissez faire regulatory regime that brought about the world’s collapse in 2007-08. Conclusion? China rising. Too bad we cannot invest in their currency because it would be going through the roof.

Read the full article →

Arianna Huffington: Davos Diary 2010: Snapshots from My Short But Sweet Visit

February 1, 2010

Because of a jam-packed week , my time at this year’s World Economic Forum was limited. But as is always the case with Davos, there were more than a few snapshot-worthy moments. Things got off to an interesting start before I even arrived. I happened to be on the same flight from D.C. to Zurich as Larry Summers, who was reading Martin Jacques’ weighty tome, “When China Rules the World . His review: “Interesting…and disturbing.” I arrived in Davos and went straight to the Newsweek lunch hosted by Lally Weymouth and Fareed Zakaria. Lally had Israeli president Shimon Peres seated on her right and Palestinian Prime Minister Salam Fayyad on her left. But the real tension at her table was between Barney Frank and Gary Cohn, the president and COO of Goldman Sachs. After the lunch, I chatted with Harvard’s Niall Ferguson about the State of the Union speech. “The president’s spending freeze is a joke,” he exclaimed. Finally, I told him, something you and Paul Krugman agree on! Then it was off to CNBC’s outdoor studio where I was interviewed by Becky Quick for Squawk Box . Here is the clip . Never mind what I said; just take in the gorgeous surroundings — it’s all about the Davos backdrop! Friday night brought a wave of end-of-week parties. At the Towers Watson/ Wall Street Journal gathering, I ran into Alan Murray, executive editor of the Journal ‘s online operations. Alan and I go way back, and found ourselves reminiscing about the days when our children were in kindergarten and elementary school together in Washington. Back then, neither one of us could ever have imagined that, 15 years later, we’d both be up to our necks in the digital world, living and breathing online news. As usual, the Google party was packed. Maybe, for Davos, they can temporarily replace “Do No Evil” with “Get More Room.” On my way out, I ran into Jacob Weisberg, who had been imbibing at the flavored oxygen bar. I asked him how it was. “Great,” he told me, a smile breaking across his face. “It gave me enough energy to last for another hour.” His favorite O2 flavor? Eucalyptus. On Saturday morning I took part in a CNBC debate on gender parity with Coca-Cola CEO Muhtar Kent, WPP CEO Martin Sorrell, Facebook COO Sheryl Sandberg, and Orit Gadiesh, chairman of Bain and Company. (Read more about the debate here .) One of the “challengers” at the event was Nicholas Kristof of the New York Times . At the end of the discussion, which included much talk about how things would be different if women were in charge, Kristof wondered what would have happened if Lehman Brothers had, in fact, been Lehman Brothers and Sisters. I said it might still be standing, since the highest form of leadership is the ability to look around corners and see the iceberg before it hits the Titanic. If women are better at maintaining the work-life balance, a less-frazzled, less sleep-deprived Lehman sister might have been able to spot the looming iceberg through the fog of highly leveraged profits and sound the alarm in time.

Read the full article →

Zhu Says China to Keep `Accommodative’ Monetary, Fiscal Policies in Place

January 30, 2010

By Simon Kennedy and Rob Delaney Jan. 30 (Bloomberg) — People’s Bank of China Deputy Governor Zhu Min signaled officials have no immediate plans to change their currency or monetary policies. “We’ll continue with current accommodative fiscal and monetary policy,” said Zhu in Davos, Switzerland, where he is attending the annual meeting of the World Economic Forum. Asked about the exchange rate, he said a “stable” yuan has helped China during the financial crisis. China grew fasters than economists anticipated in the fourth quarter, and the inflation rate accelerated to a 13- month high of 1.9 percent in December. The speed of those expansions is putting officials under pressure to consider tightening policy or allowing the yuan to gain. Zhu said inflation expectations and overcapacity pose challenges for the government, which is continuing efforts to rebalance the economy toward domestic consumption and away from export-led growth. This is a process that “will take time,” he said. China wants to ensure the “growth path is stable all the year along,” Zhu said. The Chinese economy expanded 10.7 percent during the last quarter of 2009 from a year earlier, the fastest pace since 2007, buoyed by new loans. The International Monetary Fund forecasts China’s growth will accelerate this year to 10 percent from 8.7 percent in 2009. Davos Demands Billionaire investor George Soros and U.S. Representative Barney Frank were among Davos delegates that urged China this week to allow its currency to strengthen. The world’s fastest- growing major economy has controlled the yuan since July 2008 after it strengthened 21 percent against the dollar over the previous three years. Zhu said stability is important for China’s economy and that a “stable exchange rate” during a crisis “is good for China and good for world.” He argued any change would only play a “small part” in rebalancing the world economy although China is willing to work with other nations in withdrawing emergency stimulus. “You change exchange rates, you don’t necessarily change the trade balance,” he said. The government will need to rein in overcapacity in steel, cement, shipbuilding and other industries to account for a drop in exports to the U.S. and other traditional customers, the central banker said, adding that the government aims to keep economic growth between 8 percent and 9 percent this year. Controlling inflation expectations will be “very important” in 2010 and money and loan growth is “very strong,” he said. Chinese regulators began restricting new loans after a surge in bank lending since Jan. 1 and an unprecedented credit growth of 9.59 trillion yuan ($1.4 trillion) in 2009 fanned concerns of a property bubble. To contact the reporter on this story: Simon Kennedy in Davos at skennedy4@bloomberg.net ; Rob Delaney in Davos at robdelaney@bloomberg.net

Read the full article →

Roubini Calls U.S. Growth `Dismal and Poor’, Predicts Second-Half Slowdown

January 30, 2010

By Simon Kennedy and Erik Schatzker Jan. 30 (Bloomberg) — New York University Professor Nouriel Roubini , who anticipated the financial crisis, called the fourth quarter surge in U.S. economic growth “very dismal and poor” because it relied on temporary factors. Roubini said more than half of the 5.7 percent expansion reported yesterday by the government was related to a replenishing of inventories and that consumption depended on monetary and fiscal stimulus. As these forces ebb, growth will slow to just 1.5 percent in the second half of 2010, he said. “The headline number will look large and big, but actually when you dissect it, it’s very dismal and poor,” Roubini told Bloomberg Television in an interview at the World Economic Forum’s annual meeting in Davos, Switzerland. “I think we are in trouble.” Roubini said while the world’s largest economy won’t relapse into recession, unemployment will rise from the current 10 percent, posing social and political challenges. “It’s going to feel like a recession even if technically we’re not going to be in a recession,” he said. To contact the reporter on this story: Simon Kennedy in Davos at skennedy4@bloomberg.net

Read the full article →