wyeth

By Zachary R. Mider Dec. 23 (Bloomberg) — Energy and financial-services companies may lead a rebound in takeovers in 2010 after the value of acquisitions worldwide dropped 34 percent this year, according to a Bloomberg survey. Ninety-two percent of those surveyed expect mergers and acquisitions to increase next year, the Global M&A Outlook found. Bloomberg’s survey of about 250 investment bankers, lawyers and investors was released today. About 21 percent of those surveyed expected energy companies to lead in M&A next year, while 17 percent chose financial firms. The value of takeovers dropped this year to $1.6 trillion through Dec. 15, the lowest in six years, Bloomberg data show. Gyrating financial markets and a global economic slump cut M&A by more than half since a record $4 trillion in deals in 2007. The biggest transaction of the year was drugmaker Pfizer Inc.’s $68 billion purchase of Wyeth. Exxon Mobil Corp .’s $30 billion deal for XTO Energy Inc., reached this month, may augur more takeovers by oil and gas producers to win access to shale formations. The energy industry was the third-most active in 2009 among the 10 groups tracked by Bloomberg, with 14 percent of activity. Financial companies were the most common targets this year, with 22 percent, the data show. The biggest takeovers included the U.K. government’s bailout of Royal Bank of Scotland Group Plc and fund manager BlackRock Inc.’s purchase of Barclays Plc’s investment management unit. Non-cyclical consumer companies, a category that includes health care, were the second-busiest, with 19 percent. After the Wyeth deal, the biggest transaction was Merck & Co.’s $47 billion purchase of pharmaceutical company Schering-Plough Corp. Kraft Foods Inc. has offered $16 billion for Cadbury Plc, the London-based confectioner. To contact the reporter on this story: Zachary R. Mider in New York at zmider1@bloomberg.net

See the article here:
Energy, Financials May Lead Rebound in Takeovers, Bloomberg Survey Shows

{ 0 comments }

Bloomberg:

By Shannon Pettypiece Dec. 9 (Bloomberg) — Pfizer Inc ., which became the biggest drugmaker selling widely prescribed pills such as the Lipitor heart medicine, is preparing to enter the business of making cheaper copies of pricey, injectable drugs from biotechnology. The company may sell its first copies of medicines like Amgen Inc. ’s anemia therapy Epogen or Sanofi-Aventis SA’s blood thinner Lovenox in four to five years, and eventually market 10 to 15 such drugs, said David Simmons , head of Pfizer’s Established Products Business Unit. Pfizer also may ally with or buy companies that possess the technology as part of a strategy that’s still being completed, Simmons said. Pfizer’s $68 billion Wyeth acquisition , completed in October, expanded its ability to make biologic drugs, injectable treatments made in living cells. Health-overhaul legislation, now being debated in Congress, would create the first U.S. regulatory process to copy biotech drugs, opening a market worth $10 billion in the next decade, according to Ronny Gal , a Sanford C. Bernstein analyst in New York. “While the market is young and nascent in its development, it’s going to be big,” Simmons said in a telephone interview. Pfizer still needs to complete its plans and appropriate internal funding to take advantage, he said. Pfizer, based in New York, fell 30 cents, or 1.7 percent, to $17.76 in New York Stock exchange composite trading yesterday. The drugmaker has rebounded 52 percent since reaching a 13-year low on March 2 this year, in line with a 52 percent gain in the Dow Jones Industrial Average. Lipitor Losses Pfizer Chief Executive Officer Jeffrey Kindler said during an Oct. 20 conference call with investors that he wants to increase Pfizer’s generic offerings as a new stream of revenue beyond blockbuster drugs, such as the cholesterol pill Lipitor. The company is preparing to lose most of Lipitor’s $12 billion in annual sales starting in 2011 when cheaper generic copies enter the market. Both the House and Senate health-care bills include language that would allow U.S. regulators to set up a method for approving copies of biotechnology drugs. Under the proposals, biologics would get 12 years of market exclusivity before copies could enter the market. Both chambers must agree on final language in their overhaul measures. Congress is under pressure to pass legislation creating biogenerics as a way to reduce health costs for Americans. The Congressional Budget Office estimated that introducing copies, also called biosimilars, may save $6.6 billion over 10 years with most of that amount coming after 2013. “We believe it is appropriate to provide a regulatory pathway for follow-on biologics,” Kindler said during a Dec. 1 interview in Boston. $120 Billion in Sales The Senate proposal “strikes the right balance for providing the appropriate incentives for innovators to invest in the research necessary to discover and develop innovative biologics while at the same time allowing a pathway for follow on biologics to be available to patients,” he said. Biotechnology therapies generated $120 billion in sales last year, according to data from IMS Health Inc. , a Norwalk, Connecticut-based market research firm. Individually, they are among the most expensive drugs in use today. Genzyme Corp. , for instance, charges about $200,000 a year for Cerezyme, a treatment for Gaucher disease, a hereditary disorder affecting about 10,000 people. Roche Holding AG’s Avastin can cost as much as $100,000 and treats tumors of the colon, lung, brain and breast. Pfizer Generics Pfizer has a generics business called Greenstone LLC , which it added through its April 2003 acquisition of Pharmacia Corp. That operation began to increase the number of drugs it sold last year, when Kindler formed a business unit headed by Simmons with its own budget and management focused on products that have lost patent protection. In the past year, Pfizer has bought rights to sell more than 150 generic products in more than 70 countries from two Indian drugmakers, Aurobindo Pharma Ltd. and Claris Lifesciences Ltd. The company is in talks with Aurobindo about expanding the partnership, Simmons said. The market for generics may climb to $525 billion in 2012, or twice the 2006 level, as more medicines lose patent protection, Kindler said at a conference last year. “I think it is a good strategy for a large company like Pfizer that wants to be a player in generics,” Bernstein’s Gal said. “I would be surprised if they weren’t considering” biogenerics. The market for biologic copies will grow during the next five years as patents expire on medicines whose annual sales total $15.3 billion, including Roche’s cancer drug MabThera, sold as Rituxan in the U.S. with Biogen Idec Inc., and Eli Lilly & Co.’s diabetes treatment Humalog, according to IMS. Market Rivals That market is already drawing rival pharmaceutical companies. Merck & Co., based in Whitehouse Station, New Jersey, announced plans last year to start a unit to copy biotech medicines and said it would sell at least six biogeneric drugs by 2017. Biosimilars are attractive to drugmakers because they are priced higher than traditional generic pills. Making a copy of a biologic medicine costs less than inventing one because there is less testing and development involved. Copies of biotech drugs have been sold in Europe since 2006, and companies in that market are investing in technology to bolster their capabilities in anticipation of new U.S. rules. Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., of Petah Tikva, Israel, Novartis AG’s Sandoz division, of Basel, Switzerland, and Hospira Inc., of Lake Forest, Illinois, have won approval in Europe for biosimilars. These products aren’t considered interchangeable with brand-name medicines in Europe unlike with generic pharmaceuticals. Biosimilar Investment Novartis , which sells versions of Epogen and Pfizer’s growth hormone Genotropin through its Sandoz unit, committed as much as $263 million to Momenta Pharmaceuticals Inc., of Cambridge, Massachusetts, to copy Lovenox. Teva, which sells in Europe a copy of Amgen’s Neupogen, used to treat infections in patients undergoing chemotherapy, is seeking approval of the drug in the U.S. as a new medicine because there isn’t a procedure yet to approve biosimilars. Teva is the world’s biggest maker of generic drugs. Through the Wyeth purchase in October, Pfizer gained a larger biologic business than its own. Before that, Pfizer had been buying smaller biotech companies, such as CovX Research LLC for its antibody technology and Rinat Neuroscience Corp. for its experimental Alzheimer’s drug. Simmons said he is on the hunt for deals and partnerships with companies that have biologic technology. ‘External Opportunity’ “If I see an opportunity in the near term with an external partner, I would be pursuing it pretty rapidly using my business unit’s own resources,” Simmons said. Pfizer has its own biologics, such as the arthritis treatment Enbrel, which it got from its acquisition of Wyeth, and the human growth hormone Genotropin, that may face competition once legislation is enacted. “Eventually you are going to see a lot more companies looking into biosimilars,” said James Greenwood , CEO of the Washington-based Biotechnology Industry Organization in a Dec. 3 interview. “It will be the biggest generic companies, it will be big pharma and big biotech.” To contact the reporters on this story: Shannon Pettypiece in New York at spettypiece@bloomberg.net ;

Read more from the original source:
Pfizer Faces Life After Lipitor by Embracing Bio-Generics to Spur Growth

{ 0 comments }

Bikini Babe, Crusoe Paintings by Wyeths Lead $12.6 Million Auction Sales

December 1, 2009

By Katya Kazakina Dec. 1 (Bloomberg) — Paintings by three generations of Wyeths — N.C., his son Andrew and grandson Jamie — are heading to the auction block in New York this week with a combined high estimate of $12.6 million. Twenty-two Wyeth lots are included in the American Paintings, Drawings and Sculpture sales at Christie’s International tomorrow and Sotheby’s on Dec. 3. The priciest, Andrew Wyeth’s melancholy depiction of a long-limbed teenager, may fetch as much as $5 million at Christie’s. It comes from the estate of mutual-fund pioneer Jack J. Dreyfus . Dreyfus, who died in March, bought Wyeth’s tempera-on-panel painting in 1961, a year after its creation. He had loaned it for exhibitions at New York’s Whitney Museum of American Art and the Albright-Knox Art Gallery in Buffalo, New York. Entitled “Above the Narrows,” the work depicts Wyeth’s son Nicky looking over dark, shimmering water, with his luminous white shirt billowing in the wind. N.C. Wyeth’s 14 canvases, dating from 1920 and illustrating Daniel Defoe’s 1719 adventure tale “Robinson Crusoe,” are being sold by the Wilmington Institute Library . Rich with violet and blue shades, the works show the shipwrecked adventurer reading the Bible, chatting with a parrot and meeting his servant Friday. Bikini Painting The artist sold the catalog to the library in 1921 and it’s been there ever since. Cosmopolitan Book Corp. published Wyeth’s illustrations in a 1920 edition of the book. Christie’s is offering each canvas separately, with estimates as low as $150,000 to $250,000 and as much as $400,000 to $600,000. The group is expected to bring in as much as $4.7 million. “We couldn’t conceive of a buyer who’d want them all,” Eric Widing , Christie’s head of American Paintings, Drawings and Sculpture Department, said in an interview. “We tried to make logical decisions based on the quality and drama; the more action, the higher the estimate.” At Sotheby’s , Andrew Wyeth’s “Bikini” (1968) is estimated to sell for $300,000 to $500,000. It depicts the artist’s model, Siri Erickson, standing in a darkened doorway in a yellow, flower-patterned two-piece. Pale and slumping, the dirty-blonde is no “Baywatch” babe. ‘Moon Landing’ The least expensive Wyeth lot up for auction is Jamie’s “Moon Landing” oil painting (1969), showing a wrecked ship’s bollard on a moonlit beach. The estimate is $30,000 to $50,000. The auction houses have lowered estimates because of the tough economic conditions. For some artists they are 10 percent less than two years ago. Others are down 50 percent, Widing said. An exception is John Singer Sargent’s smoldering “Mademoiselle Suzanne Poirson,” estimated to sell for $700,000 to $1 million at Christie’s. The 1884 oil on canvas with a fiery red bow fetched $132,000 in 1985. If the work mirrored the performance of the Mei Moses art index from the end of 1985 to the end of October 2009, its value would now be about $330,000, according to the index’s co-founder Michael Moses. Consigners to the American art auctions include the estates of hotdog maker Oscar Mayer , whose brand is now part of Kraft Foods Inc .; longtime Metropolitan Museum of Art trustee Jane Engelhard; and Ohio collectors Mary Schiller Myers and Louis S. Myers, whose postwar art trove sold for $24.5 million at Sotheby’s last month. The Corcoran Gallery of Art in Washington and the Delaware Art Museum are also selling works to raise acquisition funds. ( Katya Kazakina is a reporter for Bloomberg News. The opinions expressed are her own.) To contact the reporter of this story: Katya Kazakina in New York at kkazakina@bloomberg.net .

Read the full article →

Pfizer Gets New Trial on Prempro Damages; Court Upholds Breast Cancer Link

November 2, 2009

By Jef Feeley and Sophia Pearson Nov. 2 (Bloomberg) — Pfizer Inc. doesn’t have to pay more than $27 million in punitive damages to an Arkansas woman who blamed her breast cancer on the company’s menopause drugs, an appeals court ruled in ordering a new trial on the award. The U.S. Court of Appeals in St. Louis today upheld a jury’s March 2008 finding that the hormone-replacement drugs helped cause Donna Scroggin’s cancer and its award of actual damages. The three-judge panel also backed a judge’s decision to throw out the punitive award to Scroggin, who alleged two Pfizer units ignored or downplayed the risks of the drugs. “Scroggin presented sufficient evidence to submit the question of punitive damages to the jury,” the appeals court said in its 41-page ruling. “The evidence presented could allow a jury to find or infer that Wyeth was guilty of malicious conduct within the meaning of Arkansas law.” Scroggin was among 6 million women who took the pills to treat menopause symptoms such as hot flashes, night sweats and mood swings. Pfizer’s Wyeth unit has said in U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission filings that it faces more than 9,000 lawsuits over its menopause drugs, which are still on the market. New York-based Pfizer completed the $68 billion purchase of Wyeth on Oct. 15. Liability Decision “We are pleased with the appeals court’s decision to set aside the punitive verdict, but disappointed that the court upheld the jury’s liability decision,” Pfizer spokesman Christopher Loder said in an e-mailed statement. “We are evaluating our legal options about next steps in this case.” Jurors awarded Scroggin about $2.7 million in actual damages over her claims the drugs helped cause her breast cancer. The appellate panel rebuffed Pfizer’s challenge to that award. It was the first review by an appeals court of a verdict favoring plaintiffs in a Prempro case, said Jim Morris, one of Scroggin’s lawyers. “Finally, we have an appellate court who has found it’s reasonable to conclude that Prempro causes breast cancer,” Morris said, adding that he’s looking forward to a new trial. “This jury could come back with $100 million for us this time. We don’t see this as a loss at all.” Pfizer’s lawyers argued that Scroggin received ample warning about the cancer risks tied to the company’s Prempro and Premarin drugs and chose to continue using them. They contended the entire jury verdict should be thrown out. Hormones Combined Wyeth’s sales of the drugs topped $2 billion before a 2002 study found women using the medicines had a 24 percent higher risk of breast cancer. Provera, on the market since 1959, was developed by Pfizer’s Upjohn unit, acquired in 2003 along with Pharmacia Corp. Until 1996, many menopausal women combined Premarin, Wyeth’s estrogen-based drug, with progestin-laden Provera to relieve their symptoms. That year, Wyeth combined the two hormones in its Prempro pill. Scroggin and other women contend executives at the Pfizer units turned a blind eye to studies raising questions about the link between hormone-replacement drugs and breast cancer to pump up sales of their drugs. U.S. District Judge William Wilson in Little Rock, Arkansas, found Scroggin’s lawyers couldn’t make a “clear and convincing case” that the company’s mishandling of the drugs warranted a punitive award. Still, Wilson upheld the jury’s finding that Pfizer’s drugs were one of the causes of Scroggin’s breast cancer. Tests Negative The 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals panel rejected Pfizer’s claims that Scroggin’s cancer was tied to genetics. Testing on the woman “came back negative for the most common breast cancer genes,” Circuit Judge Roger Wollman wrote. On the punitive damage issue, the appeals court found there was “sufficient evidence upon which a jury could conclude that Wyeth acted with reckless disregard to the risk of injury,” Wollman wrote. Because of procedural issues with some of the evidence Wilson allowed jurors to hear in the punitive phase, “a new trial may be had on punitive damages alone without injustice to the parties,” the judge said. The ruling comes a week after a Philadelphia jury ordered Wyeth to pay an undisclosed amount of punitive damages to an Illinois woman who developed breast cancer after taking Prempro. In September, the same jury awarded Connie Barton $3.7 million in compensatory damages over her cancer linked to Prempro. A judge sealed her punitive award until another Prempro trial in the same courthouse is completed. The case is Donna Scroggin v. Wyeth, 08-2555, 08-2711, 08- 2713, 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals (St. Louis). To contact the reporters on this story: Jef Feeley in Wilmington at jfeeley@bloomberg.net ; Sophia Pearson in Wilmington at spearson3@bloomberg.net .

Read the full article →

Australia approves Pfizer’s buyout of Wyeth

September 30, 2009

Australia approves Pfizer’s buyout of Wyeth

Read the full article →